Mitogenic effect of microorganisms
A number of pathogens carry molecules on their surface that exert a pronounced mitogenic effect on B lymphocytes. In low doses, such substances behave as type 1 thymus-independent antigens (TI-1 antigens), whereas at high concentrations they trigger a massive mitogenic response.
This reaction is highly disadvantageous for the host organism. It leads to colossal and wasteful expenditures of plastic material and energy. A vast number of B cells are recruited into the process, yet no protective effect is achieved. Primarily IgM antibodies with very low antigen affinity are synthesized, and immunological memory is completely absent.
Combined-action molecules: LPS example
Certain pathogen structures simultaneously combine the properties of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), antigens, and mitogens. A classic example is lipopolysaccharide (LPS).
LPS interacts with the TLR-4/CD14 receptor complex. This leads to the activation of innate immune cells and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) with the expression of co-stimulatory molecules, which normally should aid the adaptive immune response. However, the effect of LPS is strictly dose-dependent:
- In low doses: acts as a T-independent antigen. It is recognized by B-cell receptors (BCR) and triggers a specific, albeit low-yield, humoral response.
- At high doses: exhibits mitogenic properties that hinder the normal development of humoral defense.
Neutralization of antibodies and complement
Microorganisms are capable of directly binding key humoral factors, stripping them of their activity.
Interaction with immunoglobulins Bacteria synthesize proteins that act as false Fc receptors. For instance, protein A in the cell wall of Staphylococcus aureus (especially abundant in the Cowan strain) specifically binds to the C_H2 and C_H3 domain regions of immunoglobulins G (IgG). It competes with the true Fcγ receptors of host phagocytes, leading to a sharp decrease in bacterial opsonization. Bacterial protein G exhibits a similar competitive effect.
Binding of complement components Viruses interfere with the complement system, primarily disrupting its classical activation pathway:
- Herpes simplex virus binds the C3b component.
- Vaccinia virus intercepts the C4b component.
Cytokine manipulation
Viruses actively produce factors that modify the immune response through direct cytokine binding or mimicking their effects.
- Shope fibroma virus secretes a soluble factor that captures tumor necrosis factor (TNFα). This prevents the cytokine from binding to cell receptors and blocks the development of inflammation.
- Vaccinia virus synthesizes the serine protease inhibitor ICA. In a healthy organism, this enzyme is critical for apoptosis and the formation of mature interleukin IL-1β.
- Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) expresses the DCRF1 gene product, a protein homologous to human IL-10. It fully replicates its immunosuppressive properties: it suppresses pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion and halts the differentiation of Th1 cells. As a result, the immune response shifts toward a less effective humoral pathway to the detriment of cell-mediated immunity, which plays the primary role in fighting viruses.
Blockade of phagocytosis and antigen presentation
To protect against capture by phagocytes, microbes use components of their capsules (hyaluronic acid in Gram-positive bacteria, fimbriae in streptococci, spike proteins in neisseriae).
Mycobacterium acts in a more complex way: it expresses a protein that binds fibronectin. The latter acts as an opsonin for macrophage β1-integrins and helps the bacterium penetrate inside. Once inside, the mycobacterium secretes factors that prevent phagosome-lysosome fusion. As a result, it hides intracellularly and multiplies. It can only be killed by IFNγ, which stimulates the production of nitric oxide (NO) in the phagocyte.
MHC suppression and NK cell evasion Viruses massively downregulate the expression of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules to impair the presentation of their antigens:
- Adenoviruses block MHC-I (CD8+ lymphocytes are suppressed).
- Measles virus downregulates MHC-II (CD4+ lymphocytes are suppressed).
- Cytomegalovirus (CMV) suppresses molecules of both classes.
Downregulation of MHC-I should activate natural killer cells (NK cells). To avoid this, CMV enhances the expression of a molecule similar to non-polymorphic HLA-E, which inhibits NK cells. Viruses can also interfere with killer cell activation via stress proteins: for instance, the cytomegalovirus protein UL16 binds MIC and ULBP molecules, preventing them from fulfilling their protective function.
Briefly: answers to topical questions
What are the mechanisms of microbial inhibition of the alternative complement activation pathway?
The mechanism of microbial inhibition of the alternative complement activation pathway consists in the binding of key complement system components by viral molecules.
- Herpes simplex virus (HSV) — viral glycoproteins bind the C3b component.
This leads to direct interference with the complement system and blockade of both the classical and alternative activation pathways.
Which viruses synthesize proteins that inhibit apoptosis of the infected cell?
Poxviruses and vaccinia virus have the ability to synthesize proteins that inhibit apoptosis of the infected cell.
- Poxviruses — possess specific genes encoding apoptosis-inhibiting proteins, which serves as a viral defense mechanism.
- Vaccinia virus — produces the serine protease inhibitor ICA, which is normally required to execute apoptosis and generate the mature form of IL-1β.
To memorize viruses that block MHC, use the acronym "A-C-C": Adenovirus suppresses class one (MHC-I), Measles virus suppresses class two (MHC-II), and Cytomegalovirus suppresses both at once.
Class and exam questions
Why is the mitogenic response to infection useless for the body?
Mitogens recruit a huge number of B lymphocytes into the reaction, but this process has no protective effect. Low-affinity IgM antibodies are produced without the formation of immunological memory, which only depletes the body's resources.
How does Staphylococcus aureus interfere with antibody action?
Its surface protein A binds to the Fc fragment of immunoglobulin G (C_H2 and C_H3 regions). Because of this, macrophages cannot recognize the antibody via their Fcγ receptors, and bacterial opsonization is blocked.
What trick does the Epstein–Barr virus use to evade immunity?
EBV secretes a viral analogue of interleukin-10. This protein suppresses Th1 lymphocytes, switching the immune response from an effective antiviral cellular pathway to a less useful humoral one.
How do mycobacteria survive after being engulfed by a macrophage?
They secrete substances that block the fusion of the phagosome (the vesicle containing the bacterium) with the lysosome (the vesicle containing enzymes). A phagocyte is able to destroy a mycobacterium only after it begins producing toxic nitric oxide under the action of IFNγ.
What else to study on this topic
- Mechanisms of suppressing the uptake and processing of glycolipids by viruses (the role of CD1d molecules).
- Features of innate immune cell activation via the TLR-4/CD14 complex.
- The role of the serine protease ICA in generating the active form of IL-1β and triggering apoptosis.
- The protective activity of stress proteins MIC and ULBP during the recognition of infected cells.
- The structure and functions of bacterial capsules (neisserial spike proteins, streptococcal fimbriae) as phagocytosis inhibitors.
Master the entire topic in the "Immunology" course
This is a summary. The course covers everything tested in classes and exams.
- Complete study guide on "Mitogens and Microbial Complement Activation" and 723 other subject pages
- Assignments and quizzes after every topic — just like in a colloquium
- AI tutor answers questions on the topic anytime
- 23 video lessons on the subject
Other topics in the section "Immunity in defense and damage of the organism. Pathology of immunity"
Prepared by WhiteCoat Pro faculty in accordance with the medical school curriculum. For educational purposes only.