Log in
ACP

ACP 2017 gout guideline: key recommendations

This ACP guideline addresses the management of acute and recurrent gout, focusing on treatment choices for acute flares and the role of long-term urate-lowering therapy. It emphasizes that several anti-inflammatory options are similarly effective for acute gout and questions the strength of evidence behind routine treat-to-target serum urate monitoring.

ACP2017 editionSummary
Official guidelineManagement of Acute and Recurrent Gout: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. ACP, 2017.
Read the official guideline · Checked for a newer edition on 2026-10-20
We do not reproduce the guideline text — this page is an independent summary.

Who it applies to

Adults with acute gout flares or recurrent gout managed in outpatient or primary care settings.

Key recommendations

  • Clinicians should choose among corticosteroids, NSAIDs, or colchicine to treat patients with acute gout, based on patient preference, comorbidities, and drug interactions.
    strong, high-quality evidence
  • Low-dose colchicine is recommended over high-dose colchicine when colchicine is chosen, as it has similar efficacy with fewer gastrointestinal side effects.
    strong, moderate-quality evidence
  • Clinicians should use low-dose corticosteroids, NSAIDs, or colchicine as options rather than defaulting to one agent for all patients.
  • The guideline recommends against routinely initiating long-term urate-lowering therapy in most patients after a first gout attack or infrequent flares.
    strong, moderate-quality evidence
  • Clinicians should discuss starting urate-lowering therapy with patients having frequent flares (two or more per year), tophi, or evidence of joint damage from chronic gout.
    strong, moderate-quality evidence
  • For patients who are started on long-term urate-lowering therapy, a treat-to-symptoms strategy (titrating to reduce flares and tophi) is considered a reasonable alternative to strict treat-to-target serum urate monitoring, given insufficient evidence that treat-to-target improves outcomes.
    weak/conditional, low-quality evidence
  • The guideline highlights that evidence is insufficient to clearly favor allopurinol over febuxostat or other urate-lowering agents in terms of comparative long-term benefit.
  • Routine monitoring of serum urate levels to adjust urate-lowering drug doses against a specific numerical target is not strongly supported by the evidence reviewed.
    weak/conditional, low-quality evidence

What is new in this edition

  • This guideline departs from prior rheumatology-based guidelines (such as ACR) by not endorsing a strict treat-to-target serum urate strategy as the default approach, instead allowing a treat-to-symptoms approach as an alternative.
  • It frames the decision to start long-term urate-lowering therapy as a shared decision-making discussion rather than a default recommendation after any gout flare.

Practice points for students

  • Corticosteroids, NSAIDs, and colchicine are considered roughly equivalent for acute flare management; choice should be individualized.
  • If using colchicine, low-dose regimens are preferred over high-dose due to similar efficacy and better tolerability.
  • Not every patient with gout needs lifelong urate-lowering therapy; the decision should weigh flare frequency and presence of tophi or joint damage.
  • This guideline's stance on treat-to-symptoms versus treat-to-target urate monitoring is notably more conservative than rheumatology society guidelines, a useful point of contrast for exams.

Condition

Gout

Other guidelines on this topic

Independent educational summary written by the WhiteCoat Pro editorial team with AI assistance and checked by a second AI model. It does not reproduce the guideline text, tables or figures, and it is not affiliated with or endorsed by ACP. It is not medical advice: always read the original guideline before applying it to patients.