ECG criteria
- Measure the QT interval in a lead with a clear QRS onset and T-wave end (usually II or V5)
- A separate U wave is not included in the QT measurement; if the T and U waves fuse, choose another lead if possible, or estimate the end of T using the trough between T and U or a tangent to the descending limb of T, noting the measurement uncertainty
- If values differ across leads, use the lead with the maximum reliably measured QT duration
- Measure the preceding RR interval for that complex in seconds; in case of irregular rhythm, average across several cycles
- Calculate QTc = QT / √RR
- Normal QTc values: men up to 0.45 s (450 ms), women up to 0.46 s (460 ms) according to most guidelines
- Evaluate borderline values (450–480 ms) with caution, repeat measurement, and consider the clinical context
- If heart rate is significantly higher or lower than 60–70 bpm, or with a wide QRS, the result of the Bazett formula is considered less reliable
What it looks like on ECG
The Bazett formula is not a separate ECG pattern, but a calculation applied to the standard QT interval. On the tracing, find the lead where the T wave is clearly demarcated from the baseline and the U wave — usually lead II or V5, but choose the lead where the end of the T wave is best visualized; if leads disagree, use the maximum reliably measured QT duration. Measure:
- QT — from the onset of the QRS complex (first deviation from the baseline) to the end of the T wave (return to baseline or intersection point with the tangent to the steepest part of the descending limb of T);
- RR — in regular rhythm, the distance between adjacent R waves preceding the measured complex, in seconds; in sinus arrhythmia or atrial fibrillation, a single cycle is not enough — measure and average QT and RR over several cycles or use a validated correction method for AF.
Bazett formula:
QTc = QT / √RR
Example: QT = 0.40 s, RR = 0.80 s (HR 75 bpm). √0.80 ≈ 0.894. QTc = 0.40 / 0.894 ≈ 0.447 s (447 ms) — within normal limits.
At HR 100 bpm (RR = 0.60 s) and the same QT = 0.40 s: √0.60 ≈ 0.775, QTc ≈ 0.516 s (516 ms) — the formula may overestimate QTc, especially during tachycardia; the 100 bpm threshold here is conventional, the error builds up gradually rather than appearing abruptly at a single heart rate value.
Many modern electrocardiographs automatically calculate QTc using Bazett's formula, but the automated QT is frequently overestimated or underestimated in the presence of low-amplitude T waves, fusion with U waves, or artifacts — manual verification in 1–2 leads is mandatory for any clinically significant result.
Mechanism
The QT interval reflects the total duration of ventricular depolarization and repolarization. QT duration is physiologically dependent on heart rate rhythm: during tachycardia, cardiomyocyte action potential shortens, and during bradycardia, it lengthens. To compare QT among different patients and at different heart rates, it is normalized to the duration of the cardiac cycle (RR). Bazett proposed dividing QT by the square root of RR — an empirical, non-physiologically derived relationship obtained from a small sample in the early 20th century. The square root of RR underestimates QT shortening at high heart rates and overestimates QT shortening at low heart rates, causing the formula to systematically distort QTc at the extremes of the heart rate range.
Normal Variants
Normal QTc values according to Bazett (common variants from various sources):
- men: up to 0.44–0.45 s (440–450 ms);
- women: up to 0.45–0.46 s (450–460 ms);
- borderline values: 0.45–0.46 s in men, 0.46–0.47 s in women.
These figures are population reference limits in general ECG practice, not diagnostic criteria for long QT syndrome. A QTc >450 ms in men and >460 ms in women is generally considered prolonged; the 450–480 ms range requires confirmation and clinical evaluation, rather than a definitive 'normal/pathology' interpretation based on a single number.
Diagnosis of congenital long QT syndrome relies on repeat measurements, clinical criteria (e.g., Schwartz score), personal and family history of syncope and sudden death, and genetic testing. For diagnosing congenital LQTS, a QTc ≥480 ms on repeat ECGs, after excluding secondary causes, is a strong diagnostic criterion; the diagnosis is established taking into account the Schwartz score, history, and family data, rather than a single measurement. A QTc of 460–479 ms is typically considered mainly in the presence of additional clinical features (symptoms, family history, genetics).
Discrepancies in figures between sources (Goldberger, Surawicz/Knilans, AHA/ACCF/HRS 2009 guidelines) are due to different studied populations and rounding; in practice, thresholds around 450 ms (men) and 460 ms (women) serve as the upper limit of normal, with caution warranted already in the 450–480 ms range depending on the clinical situation.
Pathological changes / Method limitations
The Bazett formula is least accurate precisely where QTc measurement is most needed:
- tachycardia — overestimates QTc, which may create a false impression of long QT syndrome;
- bradycardia — underestimates prolongation, potentially missing a truly prolonged QT. Bazett's formula is especially prone to overestimating QTc during tachycardia and underestimating it during bradycardia; the further the HR is from approximately 60–70 bpm, the more cautiously the result should be interpreted — the error accumulates gradually rather than appearing abruptly at a single heart rate cutoff, and its magnitude also depends on the QT measurement method and the individual QT-HR relationship in a given patient;
- atrial fibrillation and irregular rhythm — RR varies from cycle to cycle, calculation based on a single interval is unreliable, and averaging over several cycles is recommended;
- wide QRS (bundle branch block, ventricular pacing, pre-excitation) — QT prolongation is partly due to depolarization itself (wide QRS) rather than repolarization, and a simple change in the heart rate correction formula does not solve this problem. In this situation, QTc cannot be interpreted in a standard manner: it is preferable to evaluate the JT/JTc interval (from the J point to the end of T, minus the QRS duration) or use special QT correction methods adjusted for QRS width, keeping in mind the limitations and lower validation of these approaches compared to standard QTc with a narrow QRS.
In tachy- and bradycardia (without wide QRS), Fridericia's formula (cube root of RR) or other formulas (Framingham, Hodges) are preferred as they distort the result less at the extremes of the heart rate range.
Clinical significance and management
QTc is used to assess the risk of ventricular arrhythmias such as torsades de pointes, diagnose long and short QT syndromes, monitor therapy with QT-prolonging drugs (antiarrhythmics, certain psychotropics, and antibiotics), and evaluate electrolyte disturbances (hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia).
The physician should on the ECG: measure QT in the lead with the clearest T-wave boundaries, calculate QTc using Bazett's formula at a heart rate close to normal, use Fridericia's formula additionally in marked tachycardia or bradycardia, evaluate JT/JTc or specialized correction methods instead of standard QTc in wide QRS. The result must be evaluated considering sex and clinical context (medications, electrolytes, family history of syncope and sudden death). A markedly prolonged or shortened QTc is an indication to rule out secondary causes and consult a cardiologist/arrhythmologist.
Common interpretation errors
- including the U wave in the QT measurement when it fuses with T, which overestimates the value;
- calculating QTc with Bazett's formula during marked tachycardia without correction — resulting in false prolongation;
- measuring QT in a lead with a low-amplitude or biphasic T wave, where the end of the wave is difficult to determine;
- using RR from an irregular rhythm (AF) without averaging multiple cycles;
- standard interpretation of QTc in wide QRS (bundle branch block, ventricular pacing) without accounting for the depolarization contribution — in this case, JT/JTc or specialized correction methods are needed, rather than just a different HR-correction formula.
QTc = QT divided by the square root of RR — remember the 'square root' as the Bazett formula (as opposed to the cube root in Fridericia)
1. Which formula is used in calculating QTc by Bazett?
Bazett's formula: QTc equals QT divided by the square root of RR (RR in seconds).
2. In which clinical situation does Bazett's formula yield the least reliable result?
At heart rates significantly above or below normal, the square root of RR systematically distorts QTc — overestimating it during tachycardia and underestimating it during bradycardia.
3. What Bazett's QTc threshold is most commonly considered the upper limit of normal in women?
In women, the upper limit of normal for QTc according to most guidelines is about 0.46 s (460 ms), and in men — about 0.45 s (450 ms).
Frequently asked questions
How does Bazett's formula differ from Fridericia's formula?
Bazett divides QT by the square root of RR, while Fridericia divides it by the cube root of RR. Fridericia's formula distorts the result less during tachycardia and is considered more accurate in this range, but Bazett's formula is historically used more often and is built into most electrocardiographs.
Can you trust the automatic QTc on the electrocardiograph?
Automatic calculation is convenient for screening, but in the presence of low-amplitude T waves, fusion with the U wave, or artifacts, the algorithm can make mistakes. For a clinically significant result (decision to prescribe a drug, suspicion of long QT syndrome), QT must be measured manually in 1–2 leads.
Is prolonged Bazett's QTc dangerous?
Calculated QTc by itself is not a diagnosis, but a risk marker. Marked prolongation increases the risk of torsades de pointes, especially in the setting of QT-prolonging drugs or electrolyte disturbances. It requires determining the cause and clinical assessment, not just looking at the numbers.
Why does Bazett's formula give an inaccurate result at high HR?
The formula is empirical and was derived from a limited sample without accounting for the true physiological dependence of QT on heart rate. During tachycardia, the square root of RR underestimates the physiological shortening of QT, resulting in an artificially inflated calculated QTc.
How to calculate QTc with a wide QRS, for example, in bundle branch block?
Standard QTc cannot be interpreted in this situation because the QT prolongation is partly related to the duration of depolarization itself rather than repolarization. It is preferable to evaluate the JT/JTc interval or use special correction methods adjusted for QRS width, taking their limitations into account.
ECG Course
Interpretation from basics to myocardial infarction — learn to read any ECG using a systematic algorithm.
- Video lessons and theory for every topic
- Simulator case studies under every lesson
- Unlimited ECG simulator practice
- Study guide: "All ECGs in 25 minutes"
ECG Strip Simulator
ECG, radiology, histology, pathomorphology, pharmacology — thousands of flashcards with detailed explanations.
- Real ECG strips, not textbook drawings
- Instant answers and explanations
- Streaks and progress tracking in your dashboard
Related terms
More in the section "Criteria, Formulas, Algorithms"
Sources
- Goldberger's Clinical Electrocardiography, current edition
- Surawicz, Knilans «Chou's Electrocardiography in Clinical Practice»
- AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram, 2009
- Orlov, V.N. «Electrocardiography Guide»
Educational material for medical students and physicians. Does not replace clinical guidelines and physical examination; the ECG must always be interpreted in conjunction with the clinical picture.