Trauma: Primary Survey & Airway
6 questionsA 24-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motorcycle collision. He was found unresponsive at the scene. On arrival, his temperature is 37.0°C (98.6°F), pulse is 110/min, blood pressure is 100/70 mmHg, and respirations are 10/min with snoring sounds. He opens his eyes to painful stimuli, withdraws to pain, and makes incomprehensible sounds. His oxygen saturation is 94% on a nonrebreather mask. There is no facial trauma or stridor. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- APerform endotracheal intubation
- BObtain arterial blood gas analysis
- CPlace a nasopharyngeal airway and observe
- DAdminister naloxone
- EObtain a CT scan of the head
Show answer
This patient has a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 (E2V2M4), which is a standard indication for definitive airway placement in trauma because patients with GCS ≤8 cannot reliably protect their airway and are at high risk for aspiration and hypoventilation. Endotracheal intubation secures the airway, allows controlled ventilation, and protects against aspiration while further workup proceeds. Imaging and other diagnostic steps must wait until the airway is secured per ATLS principles of airway before diagnostics. There is no indication of opioid overdose or isolated facial trauma requiring a surgical airway.
- B. Blood gas analysis does not take priority over securing the airway in this unresponsive patient.
- C. A nasopharyngeal airway is inadequate for a patient with GCS ≤8 who needs definitive airway protection.
- D. There is no history or exam finding suggesting opioid toxicity.
- E. Imaging should not precede airway management in an unstable, obtunded trauma patient.
A 32-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being kicked in the face by a horse. He is agitated and making gurgling sounds. Examination shows a grossly deformed midface with active oral bleeding, bilateral periorbital ecchymosis, and an unstable maxilla that moves independently of the skull on palpation. His oxygen saturation is 88% on a nonrebreather mask despite suctioning. Attempts to visualize the vocal cords with a laryngoscope are unsuccessful due to blood obscuring the airway and distorted anatomy. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- APerform nasotracheal intubation
- BPerform a surgical cricothyroidotomy
- CInsert a supraglottic airway device
- DAttempt bag-mask ventilation and reassess in 5 minutes
- ERepeat attempt at orotracheal intubation with video laryngoscopy
Show answer
Severe facial trauma with massive bleeding and distorted anatomy that prevents successful orotracheal intubation is a classic indication for a surgical airway. Cricothyroidotomy bypasses the disrupted upper airway anatomy and ongoing hemorrhage, providing a rapid, reliable airway below the level of injury. Repeated laryngoscopy attempts waste time and risk further hypoxia when the airway cannot be visualized. Nasotracheal intubation is contraindicated with suspected midface or basilar skull fractures because of the risk of intracranial tube placement.
- A. Nasotracheal intubation is contraindicated with possible midface/skull base fracture.
- C. A supraglottic device does not protect against aspiration of blood and is unreliable with distorted facial anatomy.
- D. Continued bag-mask ventilation is inadequate when the airway is obstructed by blood and distorted anatomy.
- E. Repeating a failed technique in a desaturating patient delays definitive airway control.
A 28-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being stabbed in the left chest. His pulse is 128/min, blood pressure is 82/54 mmHg, and respirations are 32/min. Oxygen saturation is 86% on a nonrebreather mask. Examination shows jugular venous distention, tracheal deviation to the right, and absent breath sounds over the left hemithorax with hyperresonance to percussion. Heart sounds are distant but audible. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- ACardiac tamponade
- BRuptured diaphragm
- CTension pneumothorax
- DMassive hemothorax
- EFlail chest
Show answer
Tracheal deviation away from the affected side, absent breath sounds, hyperresonance, jugular venous distention, and hypotension are classic findings of tension pneumothorax, caused by a one-way air leak that increases intrapleural pressure, collapses the ipsilateral lung, and shifts the mediastinum, impairing venous return to the heart. Cardiac tamponade also causes jugular venous distention and hypotension but presents with muffled heart sounds and no tracheal deviation or hyperresonance. Massive hemothorax causes dullness to percussion rather than hyperresonance.
- A. Tamponade causes muffled heart sounds and jugular venous distention but not tracheal deviation or unilateral hyperresonance.
- B. Diaphragmatic rupture typically shows bowel sounds in the chest, not hyperresonance with tracheal shift.
- D. Hemothorax produces dullness, not hyperresonance, on percussion.
- E. Flail chest presents with paradoxical chest wall movement, not tracheal deviation or absent breath sounds.
A 35-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a high-speed motor vehicle collision. His pulse is 132/min, blood pressure is 78/50 mmHg, and respirations are 34/min with oxygen saturation of 84% on a nonrebreather mask. Examination shows distended neck veins, tracheal deviation to the left, and absent breath sounds with hyperresonance over the right hemithorax. He is in severe respiratory distress. Which of the following is the most appropriate immediate next step in management?
- APerform needle decompression of the chest
- BPlace a right-sided chest tube using sterile technique in the operating room
- CAdminister intravenous fluids and reassess vitals in 10 minutes
- DPerform bedside echocardiography
- EObtain a portable chest radiograph
Show answer
This patient has clinical findings of tension pneumothorax with hemodynamic instability, which requires immediate needle decompression rather than waiting for imaging or confirmatory tests. Needle decompression (large-bore needle in the second intercostal space, midclavicular line, or the fifth intercostal space, anterior axillary line) rapidly relieves the intrapleural pressure and is followed by formal tube thoracostomy. Diagnostic imaging or echocardiography would delay life-saving treatment in a decompensating patient. A sterile chest tube in the operating room introduces unacceptable delay.
- B. Taking the patient to the operating room for sterile tube placement delays urgent decompression.
- C. Fluids alone do not address the underlying mechanical cause of shock and delay definitive treatment.
- D. Echocardiography is used to evaluate tamponade, not tension pneumothorax, and would delay treatment.
- E. Imaging delays treatment in a patient who is hemodynamically unstable with a clinical diagnosis already evident.
A 27-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after sustaining a shotgun injury to the right chest. There is a 4-cm open wound over the right lateral chest wall with audible air movement through the wound with each breath. His pulse is 118/min, blood pressure is 96/62 mmHg, and respirations are 28/min with oxygen saturation of 90% on a nonrebreather mask. Breath sounds are decreased on the right. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- APerform immediate needle decompression on the right
- BLeave the wound open and apply high-flow oxygen
- CApply a three-sided occlusive dressing over the wound
- DApply a fully sealed occlusive dressing over the wound
- EPack the wound with sterile gauze and apply pressure
Show answer
An open ('sucking') chest wound should be covered with a dressing taped on three sides, leaving one side open to act as a flutter valve. This allows air to escape during expiration while preventing air entry during inspiration, reducing the risk of converting the injury into a tension pneumothorax. A fully occlusive (four-sided) dressing can trap air inside the pleural space and precipitate tension pneumothorax. Packing the wound tightly similarly risks trapping air and worsening the physiology.
- A. Needle decompression is not indicated unless tension pneumothorax physiology develops; the open wound itself needs dressing first.
- B. Leaving the wound open without any dressing allows continued air movement and does not address the defect.
- D. A fully sealed dressing traps air in the pleural space and can cause tension pneumothorax.
- E. Packing and tight pressure can trap air and precipitate tension pneumothorax.
A 54-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being struck by a car while crossing the street. He is in moderate respiratory distress. His pulse is 112/min, blood pressure is 128/80 mmHg, and respirations are 26/min with oxygen saturation of 91% on room air. Examination shows a segment of the right anterolateral chest wall that moves inward during inspiration and outward during expiration, opposite to the rest of the chest wall. Palpation reveals crepitus over multiple adjacent ribs. Breath sounds are decreased at the right base. Arterial blood gas shows PaO2 of 62 mmHg on room air. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- ATraumatic diaphragmatic rupture
- BSimple rib fracture
- CTension pneumothorax
- DPericardial tamponade
- EFlail chest with underlying pulmonary contusion
Show answer
Flail chest occurs when three or more adjacent ribs are fractured in two or more places, creating a free-floating segment that moves paradoxically with respiration, inward on inspiration and outward on expiration, due to loss of continuity with the bony thorax. The underlying pulmonary contusion, not the paradoxical motion itself, is the primary cause of hypoxemia, as seen here with a PaO2 of 62 mmHg. Management focuses on pain control, pulmonary hygiene, and judicious fluid management, with intubation reserved for respiratory failure. Tension pneumothorax would show tracheal deviation and absent breath sounds, not a paradoxically moving segment.
- A. Diaphragmatic rupture presents with bowel sounds in the chest or respiratory distress without paradoxical wall motion.
- B. A simple rib fracture does not cause paradoxical chest wall movement.
- C. Tension pneumothorax presents with tracheal deviation, absent breath sounds, and jugular venous distention, not paradoxical chest wall motion.
- D. Pericardial tamponade presents with muffled heart sounds, jugular venous distention, and pulsus paradoxus, not chest wall paradox.
Trauma: Shock & Resuscitation
3 questionsA 29-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motorcycle collision. He is confused and diaphoretic. Blood pressure is 76/42 mmHg, heart rate is 138/min, and respiratory rate is 28/min. FAST shows free fluid in the abdomen. Two units of O-negative packed red blood cells have been given, and the massive transfusion protocol has been activated. Which of the following is the most appropriate blood product administration strategy?
- APacked red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma in a 4:1 ratio
- BFresh frozen plasma alone until coagulation studies normalize
- CPacked red blood cells and crystalloid in a 1:3 ratio without plasma
- DPacked red blood cells alone until hemoglobin falls below 7 g/dL
- EPacked red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets in a 1:1:1 ratio
Show answer
Patients in hemorrhagic shock requiring massive transfusion benefit from early balanced resuscitation with packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets in a 1:1:1 ratio, which approximates whole blood and reduces dilutional coagulopathy. The PROPPR trial demonstrated improved hemostasis and fewer deaths from exsanguination with this ratio compared with a 2:1:1 ratio. Crystalloid-predominant resuscitation worsens coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia (the lethal triad). Waiting for a hemoglobin threshold or treating coagulopathy in isolation delays correction of the global oxygen debt and clotting factor depletion.
- A. A plasma-poor ratio increases dilutional coagulopathy compared with balanced 1:1:1 resuscitation.
- B. Plasma alone does not restore oxygen-carrying capacity or platelet function needed in hemorrhagic shock.
- C. Crystalloid-heavy resuscitation dilutes clotting factors and worsens the lethal triad of acidosis, hypothermia, and coagulopathy.
- D. Delaying transfusion until a hemoglobin threshold ignores ongoing hemorrhage and risks worsening coagulopathy.
A 24-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being stabbed in the left chest. Blood pressure is 82/60 mmHg, heart rate is 128/min, and respiratory rate is 26/min. He is anxious with distended neck veins. Heart sounds are faint and distant. During inspiration, systolic blood pressure drops by 18 mmHg. Breath sounds are equal bilaterally. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- ACardiac tamponade
- BFlail chest
- CTension pneumothorax
- DMassive hemothorax
- EAcute myocardial infarction
Show answer
Jugular venous distention, muffled heart sounds, and hypotension (Beck triad) together with pulsus paradoxus greater than 10 mmHg after penetrating chest trauma indicate cardiac tamponade from pericardial blood accumulation restricting diastolic filling. Equal, bilateral breath sounds argue against tension pneumothorax, which would also cause tracheal deviation and hyperresonance. Massive hemothorax causes hypotension with jugular venous flattening (from hypovolemia) and decreased breath sounds on the affected side, not distention. Myocardial infarction and flail chest do not produce this triad after a penetrating wound.
- B. Flail chest presents with paradoxical chest wall movement and respiratory distress, not Beck triad.
- C. Tension pneumothorax would show absent or decreased breath sounds on the affected side and tracheal deviation, not equal breath sounds.
- D. Massive hemothorax causes flat neck veins from hypovolemia and diminished breath sounds, not distention with muffled heart sounds.
- E. Myocardial infarction does not explain the penetrating wound mechanism, jugular distention, or muffled heart sounds.
A 35-year-old woman is brought to the trauma bay after a high-speed motor vehicle collision. She is unresponsive to voice but withdraws to pain. Blood pressure is 84/50 mmHg, heart rate is 134/min, and oxygen saturation is 94% on a nonrebreather mask. Breath sounds are equal bilaterally, and the trachea is midline. The abdomen is distended and diffusely tender. Which of the following is the most appropriate initial test to guide immediate management?
- ADiagnostic peritoneal lavage
- BContrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis
- CUpright chest and pelvis radiographs
- DFocused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST)
- EExploratory laparotomy without imaging
Show answer
In a hemodynamically unstable blunt trauma patient, FAST is the best initial test because it is rapid, portable, repeatable, and can be performed in the trauma bay without interrupting resuscitation, identifying free intraperitoneal or pericardial fluid within minutes. CT is more sensitive and specific for grading solid organ injury but requires transport to the scanner and hemodynamic stability, making it unsafe here. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is invasive, time-consuming, and has been largely replaced by FAST. Plain radiographs do not reliably detect intraperitoneal hemorrhage. Proceeding directly to laparotomy without any imaging risks a nontherapeutic operation if the hypotension has another source.
- A. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is invasive and slower than FAST and is rarely used in current practice.
- B. CT requires transport out of the resuscitation area and hemodynamic stability, which this unstable patient does not have.
- C. Plain radiographs cannot reliably detect intraperitoneal free fluid or guide the need for immediate laparotomy.
- E. Some initial bedside assessment should confirm a source of hemorrhage before committing to laparotomy.
Trauma: Abdominal & Pelvic Injury
2 questionsA 32-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department after a high-speed motorcycle collision. Blood pressure is 82/50 mmHg, heart rate is 130/min, and respiratory rate is 26/min. She is awake but confused. Examination shows pelvic instability on gentle compression of the iliac wings, with bruising over the perineum. Breath sounds are equal bilaterally, and the abdomen is soft without distension. Two large-bore intravenous lines are placed and warmed crystalloid is being infused. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AObtain anteroposterior pelvic radiograph
- BObtain CT scan of the pelvis with contrast
- CPerform angiographic embolization
- DPerform external fixation of the pelvis in the operating room
- EApply a pelvic binder at the level of the greater trochanters
Show answer
In a hemodynamically unstable trauma patient with clinical signs of pelvic fracture, a pelvic binder should be applied immediately at the level of the greater trochanters to reduce pelvic volume, stabilize the fracture, and tamponade venous and bony bleeding. This is a rapid, low-risk intervention that can be performed in the trauma bay before any imaging. Definitive imaging such as CT, as well as angiography or external fixation, should follow once the patient is temporized and transport to those resources is safe. Delaying binder placement for imaging risks ongoing exsanguination from pelvic fracture.
- A. A plain radiograph can confirm the fracture but does not address ongoing hemorrhage and should not delay binder placement.
- B. CT imaging requires transport to the scanner and should not precede temporizing stabilization in an unstable patient.
- C. Angioembolization is used for ongoing arterial hemorrhage after initial stabilization, not as the first maneuver.
- D. Operative external fixation is a definitive measure that follows initial temporizing stabilization, not the first step.
A 28-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after falling from a height and landing in a straddle position on a metal fence rail. Blood pressure is 128/80 mmHg, heart rate is 92/min. He reports an inability to urinate and perineal pain. Examination shows blood at the urethral meatus and a boggy, high-riding prostate on digital rectal examination. There is scrotal and perineal ecchymosis. A urinary catheter kit is at the bedside. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- APerform suprapubic catheter placement without imaging
- BPerform retrograde urethrogram
- CObtain CT cystogram
- DAttempt gentle Foley catheter placement
- EObtain CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast
Show answer
Blood at the urethral meatus and a high-riding prostate after pelvic trauma are classic signs of urethral injury, and attempting urethral catheterization in this setting risks converting a partial tear into a complete transection or introducing infection. A retrograde urethrogram should be performed before any attempt at catheterization to define the location and extent of urethral injury. If the urethrogram shows no extravasation, a Foley catheter can then be placed safely; if injury is confirmed, urology should place a suprapubic catheter. This stepwise approach avoids iatrogenic worsening of the injury.
- A. Suprapubic catheter placement may ultimately be needed but should follow confirmation of urethral injury by urethrogram, not precede it.
- C. CT cystogram evaluates bladder injury, not urethral injury, and is not the appropriate first test for suspected urethral trauma.
- D. Attempting catheterization before imaging risks converting a partial urethral tear into a complete disruption.
- E. CT with intravenous contrast does not reliably delineate urethral injury and is not the test of choice for this presentation.
Trauma: Head, Neck & Spine
6 questionsA 19-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being struck in the right temple by a baseball. He was briefly unconscious at the scene, then regained consciousness and was able to answer questions and walk to the ambulance. Thirty minutes later, en route to the hospital, he becomes increasingly drowsy and then unresponsive. On arrival, his Glasgow Coma Scale score is 7. His right pupil is 7 mm and nonreactive; the left pupil is 3 mm and reactive. A noncontrast CT scan of the head shows a biconvex, lens-shaped hyperdense collection in the right temporal region that does not cross suture lines. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- ADiffuse axonal injury
- BSubdural hematoma
- CCerebral contusion
- DSubarachnoid hemorrhage
- EEpidural hematoma
Show answer
A lucid interval followed by rapid neurologic deterioration after head trauma, combined with a lens-shaped (biconvex) hyperdensity on CT that does not cross suture lines, is characteristic of an epidural hematoma. This injury typically results from a temporal bone fracture lacerating the middle meningeal artery, causing arterial blood to accumulate between the dura and skull, a space limited by the dural attachments at suture lines, producing the biconvex shape. The ipsilateral blown pupil indicates uncinate herniation compressing the oculomotor nerve, a neurosurgical emergency requiring urgent evacuation. Rapid recognition and operative decompression are critical to prevent death from brainstem compression.
- A. Diffuse axonal injury typically shows punctate hemorrhages at gray-white junctions on CT or MRI, not a focal lens-shaped collection.
- B. Subdural hematoma produces a crescent-shaped collection that can cross suture lines, not a lens-shaped one confined by sutures.
- C. Cerebral contusion appears as a mixed-density area within the brain parenchyma, often at sites of direct impact, not an extra-axial lens-shaped collection.
- D. Subarachnoid hemorrhage appears as hyperdensity within the sulci and basal cisterns, not as a focal biconvex extra-axial collection.
An 82-year-old woman taking warfarin for atrial fibrillation is brought to the emergency department by her daughter because of three days of progressive confusion and lethargy. The daughter reports that the patient fell at home about two weeks ago, striking her head on a doorframe, but seemed fine at the time. Temperature is 36.9°C (98.4°F), blood pressure is 142/84 mmHg, heart rate is 78/min. She is oriented to person only and has mild left-sided weakness. International normalized ratio is 3.4. A noncontrast CT scan of the head shows a crescent-shaped hypodense-to-isodense collection along the right cerebral convexity that crosses suture lines, with mild midline shift. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- ASubarachnoid hemorrhage
- BSubdural hematoma
- CIntraparenchymal hemorrhage
- DIschemic stroke
- EEpidural hematoma
Show answer
A crescent-shaped (concave) extra-axial collection that crosses suture lines on CT, occurring in an elderly or anticoagulated patient after even minor head trauma with a delayed onset of symptoms, is characteristic of a subdural hematoma. Bridging veins between the dura and arachnoid are stretched with brain atrophy in elderly patients, making them prone to tearing with minor trauma, and anticoagulation promotes continued bleeding and hematoma expansion over days to weeks. Because the collection is not confined by dural attachments at sutures, it spreads diffusely over the convexity, producing the crescent shape. Management includes reversal of anticoagulation and neurosurgical evaluation for possible evacuation depending on size and mass effect.
- A. Subarachnoid hemorrhage appears as hyperdensity in the sulci and cisterns, not as a crescent-shaped extra-axial collection over the convexity.
- C. Intraparenchymal hemorrhage appears as a hyperdense focus within the brain tissue itself, not an extra-axial crescent-shaped collection.
- D. Ischemic stroke would show a hypodense area in a vascular territory on CT, not an extra-axial crescent-shaped collection.
- E. Epidural hematoma produces a biconvex, lens-shaped collection confined by suture lines, with rapid onset after trauma, not a crescent shape evolving over weeks.
A 45-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motor vehicle collision in which his head struck the windshield. He is awake and oriented. Blood pressure is 134/82 mmHg, heart rate is 88/min. Examination shows periorbital ecchymosis bilaterally without direct periorbital trauma, bruising over the mastoid process behind the left ear, and clear fluid dripping intermittently from the left nostril that tests positive for glucose on a bedside strip. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- AFrontal sinus fracture
- BLe Fort II facial fracture
- COrbital blowout fracture
- DNasal bone fracture
- EBasilar skull fracture
Show answer
Periorbital ecchymosis not caused by direct local trauma (raccoon eyes), bruising over the mastoid process (Battle sign), and clear fluid draining from the nose that is positive for glucose, consistent with cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea, together form the classic triad of basilar skull fracture. These findings result from fracture lines extending through the anterior or middle cranial fossa, disrupting the dura and allowing CSF leakage along with ecchymosis tracking to the periorbital and mastoid soft tissues. Diagnosis is confirmed with CT of the head and temporal bones, and management is largely supportive, with surgical repair reserved for persistent CSF leak or evidence of meningitis.
- A. A frontal sinus fracture may cause CSF rhinorrhea but does not typically produce Battle sign, which indicates a basilar fracture involving the middle fossa.
- B. Le Fort II fractures involve the midface and nasal bones with malocclusion, not the combination of raccoon eyes, Battle sign, and CSF rhinorrhea.
- C. An orbital blowout fracture causes periorbital swelling and diplopia from direct orbital trauma, not bilateral raccoon eyes with Battle sign and CSF leak.
- D. A nasal bone fracture causes local nasal swelling and epistaxis but does not explain Battle sign or CSF rhinorrhea.
A 26-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motorcycle collision. Glasgow Coma Scale score is 7. He is intubated for airway protection. Blood pressure is 128/78 mmHg, heart rate is 84/min, and oxygen saturation is 98% on mechanical ventilation. A noncontrast CT scan of the head shows diffuse cerebral edema without a surgical mass lesion. An intracranial pressure monitor is placed and reads 28 mmHg. The head of the bed is elevated to 30 degrees, and the patient is sedated and normothermic. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AAdminister intravenous mannitol
- BAdminister high-dose intravenous corticosteroids
- CInduce therapeutic hypothermia to 33°C (91.4°F)
- DPerform emergency decompressive craniectomy
- EProphylactic hyperventilation to a partial pressure of carbon dioxide of 25 mmHg
Show answer
In a patient with elevated intracranial pressure (greater than 20-22 mmHg) without a surgical mass lesion, after head elevation and sedation have been optimized, hyperosmolar therapy with intravenous mannitol or hypertonic saline is the next appropriate step to reduce cerebral edema by osmotically drawing fluid out of brain tissue. Mannitol also transiently improves cerebral blood flow by reducing blood viscosity. Prophylactic or sustained hyperventilation is avoided because it can cause cerebral vasoconstriction and worsen ischemia; it is reserved only as a brief temporizing measure for acute herniation. Corticosteroids are not beneficial for traumatic brain edema, and hypothermia and craniectomy are reserved for intracranial pressure refractory to first-tier medical therapy.
- B. High-dose corticosteroids have not been shown to improve outcomes in traumatic brain injury and are not recommended for traumatic cerebral edema.
- C. Therapeutic hypothermia is not first-line and is reserved for intracranial pressure refractory to standard medical therapy.
- D. Decompressive craniectomy is a surgical option for refractory intracranial hypertension after medical therapy has failed, not the immediate next step here.
- E. Routine or prophylactic hyperventilation to this degree causes cerebral vasoconstriction and risks ischemia; it should be used only briefly for acute herniation, not as a standard step.
A 26-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a low-speed rear-end motor vehicle collision. He is alert and cooperative. Blood pressure is 124/78 mmHg, heart rate is 78/min, and respiratory rate is 16/min. He reports mild neck discomfort but denies pain on palpation of the midline cervical spine. He has no focal neurologic deficits, is not intoxicated, and has no other distracting painful injury. He turns his head 45 degrees to each side without difficulty when asked. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AKeep the cervical collar on and admit for observation
- BObtain a CT scan of the cervical spine
- CObtain an MRI of the cervical spine
- DObtain plain radiographs of the cervical spine
- EClinically clear the cervical spine without imaging
Show answer
This patient meets all NEXUS low-risk criteria: no midline cervical tenderness, no focal neurologic deficit, normal alertness, no intoxication, and no painful distracting injury. He also demonstrates full active range of motion as required by the Canadian C-Spine Rule for low-risk patients. When these criteria are satisfied, the cervical spine can be clinically cleared without any imaging. Imaging is reserved for patients who fail these clinical decision rules, as unnecessary imaging adds cost, radiation exposure, and delays care without added benefit.
- A. Prolonged immobilization is unnecessary and can cause harm (pressure ulcers, discomfort) when clinical criteria allow clearance.
- B. CT imaging is unnecessary when a patient meets all NEXUS or Canadian C-spine low-risk criteria.
- C. MRI is reserved for suspected ligamentous or spinal cord injury, not as an initial step in a low-risk patient.
- D. Plain radiographs are not indicated when clinical decision rules permit clearance without imaging.
A 34-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being stabbed in the neck during an altercation. He is awake and anxious. Blood pressure is 96/60 mmHg, heart rate is 118/min, and respiratory rate is 22/min. Examination shows a 2-cm wound at the level of the cricoid cartilage with a rapidly expanding hematoma and an audible bruit over the area. There is no active external hemorrhage, and his voice is hoarse. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AFlexible laryngoscopy
- BImmediate surgical exploration of the neck
- CEsophagography with water-soluble contrast
- DCT angiography of the neck
- EObservation with serial examinations
Show answer
Expanding hematoma and bruit are hard signs of vascular injury, along with active pulsatile bleeding, airway compromise, and hemorrhagic shock. In penetrating neck trauma with hard signs, the patient should proceed directly to the operating room for surgical exploration regardless of the anatomic zone, bypassing further imaging. Delaying for diagnostic studies in this unstable setting risks exsanguination or airway loss. Hemodynamic instability here further supports immediate operative intervention rather than observation or imaging.
- A. Laryngoscopy may be useful for suspected airway injury in a stable patient but does not address the vascular emergency here.
- C. Esophagography evaluates for esophageal injury in stable patients and is not appropriate when hard signs mandate immediate exploration.
- D. CT angiography is appropriate for stable patients without hard signs, not when hard signs of vascular injury are present.
- E. Observation is inappropriate given hemodynamic instability and hard signs of vascular injury.
Trauma: Extremity & Compartment Syndrome
3 questionsA 19-year-old man undergoes closed reduction and casting of a closed, displaced tibial shaft fracture sustained in a motorcycle accident. Six hours later, he reports severe, worsening pain in the lower leg that is not relieved by the prescribed oxycodone. On examination, the leg is tense and swollen. Passive dorsiflexion of the toes markedly worsens the pain. Dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial pulses are palpable and symmetric with the other leg. Sensation is slightly diminished in the first web space. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- AAcute arterial occlusion
- BPeroneal nerve injury
- CFat embolism syndrome
- DAcute compartment syndrome
- EDeep venous thrombosis
Show answer
Acute compartment syndrome is a clinical diagnosis suggested by pain out of proportion to the injury that is refractory to opioids, along with pain on passive stretch of the muscles within the affected compartment. Paresthesia and pulselessness are later findings; pulses are frequently preserved early because compartment pressure rises above capillary pressure (impairing perfusion and causing ischemia) well before it exceeds arterial systolic pressure. The cast should be removed or split promptly, and compartment pressures measured if the diagnosis remains uncertain. Early recognition is essential to prevent irreversible muscle and nerve ischemia.
- A. Pulses are preserved here, and arterial occlusion alone does not produce pain with passive stretch this early.
- B. An isolated peroneal nerve injury would not cause this pattern of pain with passive stretch and compartment tenseness.
- C. Fat embolism syndrome presents with respiratory distress, petechiae, and altered mental status, not localized compartment findings.
- E. DVT typically presents with unilateral swelling and tenderness but not severe pain with passive stretch of muscle compartments.
A 22-year-old man sustains a gunshot wound to the right popliteal fossa. Blood pressure is 128/80 mmHg, heart rate is 96/min. The right lower leg is cool and pale compared with the left. There is no palpable dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial pulse on the right, and capillary refill is absent at the toes. There is a small, actively expanding hematoma at the wound site. Sensation and motor function are intact. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AAnkle-brachial index measurement
- BDoppler ultrasound of the popliteal artery
- CImmediate operative exploration of the popliteal vessels
- DObservation with serial pulse checks every 15 minutes
- ECT angiography of the lower extremity
Show answer
Absent distal pulses with an expanding hematoma and a pulseless, cool, pale limb (hard signs of vascular injury) in a patient with penetrating extremity trauma mandate immediate operative exploration. Imaging, including CT angiography or Doppler ultrasound, is reserved for patients without hard signs and would only delay revascularization, risking limb loss from prolonged ischemia (generally irreversible after 6 hours of warm ischemia). Rapid restoration of perfusion, with temporary vascular shunting if needed before definitive repair, is the priority in this setting.
- A. Ankle-brachial index is a screening tool for patients without hard signs of vascular injury, not for this clearly ischemic limb.
- B. Doppler ultrasound would delay necessary operative intervention in a limb with obvious hard signs of vascular injury.
- D. Serial observation risks progression to irreversible limb ischemia and is inappropriate when hard signs are present.
- E. CT angiography delays definitive treatment and is appropriate only when hard signs are absent.
A 31-year-old man sustains a stab wound to the posterior right thigh during an assault. Blood pressure is 122/76 mmHg, heart rate is 84/min. The wound is not actively bleeding, and there is no hematoma, bruit, or thrill. Distal pulses are palpable and symmetric, and the foot is warm with normal capillary refill. There is no neurologic deficit. The surgical team wants to determine whether a clinically significant arterial injury is present. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- ACompartment pressure measurement
- BAnkle-brachial index measurement
- CConventional catheter-based arteriography
- DImmediate operative exploration
- EVenous duplex ultrasound
Show answer
In a hemodynamically stable patient with extremity trauma and no hard signs of vascular injury, the ankle-brachial index (ABI) is the appropriate initial screening test. An ABI of 0.9 or greater has high sensitivity and specificity for excluding a clinically significant arterial injury, allowing safe observation. If the ABI is below 0.9, further imaging with CT angiography (or formal arteriography in select cases) is warranted to evaluate for occult vascular injury. This stepwise approach avoids unnecessary invasive imaging or exploration in most patients.
- A. Compartment pressure measurement evaluates for compartment syndrome, not for vascular injury.
- C. Catheter-based arteriography is invasive and reserved for cases with an abnormal ABI or other equivocal findings, not as the initial screening test.
- D. Operative exploration is reserved for hard signs of vascular injury, which are absent here.
- E. Venous duplex evaluates for venous thrombosis, not arterial injury, and is not the screening test of choice here.
Trauma: Burns
3 questionsA 70-kg man is brought to the emergency department after sustaining second-degree burns involving 40% of his total body surface area in a house fire 1 hour ago. He is alert, with a blood pressure of 118/74 mmHg and heart rate of 102/min. Intravenous access is established and lactated Ringer's solution is started. Using the Parkland formula, what is the appropriate total volume of crystalloid to be administered over the first 24 hours, calculated from the time of the burn?
- A16,800 mL
- B11,200 mL
- C8,400 mL
- D2,800 mL
- E5,600 mL
Show answer
The Parkland formula calculates total 24-hour crystalloid requirement as 4 mL x body weight in kg x % total body surface area burned, using lactated Ringer's solution: 4 x 70 x 40 = 11,200 mL. Half of this volume is given over the first 8 hours from the time of injury (not from time of arrival), and the remaining half is given over the next 16 hours. Only second- and third-degree burns are included in the %TBSA calculation; superficial first-degree burns are excluded. Fluid administration is subsequently titrated to a urine output goal of approximately 0.5 mL/kg/hr in adults.
- A. This volume corresponds to using a multiplier of 6 mL/kg/%BSA, overestimating the standard Parkland requirement.
- C. This volume corresponds to using a multiplier of 3 mL/kg/%BSA, which underestimates the standard Parkland requirement.
- D. This volume represents only the first 8-hour requirement, not the total 24-hour volume.
- E. This volume corresponds to using a multiplier of 2 mL/kg/%BSA, not the standard 4 mL/kg/%BSA Parkland formula.
A 34-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a house fire. He has deep partial-thickness burns covering his entire anterior torso, his entire right arm, and the front of his right leg. His face, back, left arm, and left leg are unaffected. Vital signs are temperature 37.1°C (98.8°F), heart rate 112/min, blood pressure 108/70 mmHg, respiratory rate 20/min. What is the estimated total body surface area affected by burns?
- A54%
- B36%
- C27%
- D18%
- E45%
Show answer
Using the rule of nines, the anterior trunk accounts for 18%, the entire arm (anterior and posterior) accounts for 9%, and the anterior surface of one leg accounts for 9%, giving a total of 18 + 9 + 9 = 36%. The rule of nines divides the adult body into regions that are each 9% or multiples of 9% of total body surface area: head and neck 9%, each arm 9%, anterior trunk 18%, posterior trunk 18%, each leg 18% (9% anterior, 9% posterior), and perineum 1%. Accurate estimation guides fluid resuscitation using formulas such as the Parkland formula.
- A. This overestimates the burned area; it would correspond to involvement of the entire leg or an additional region.
- C. This underestimates the total; it omits the correct contribution of either the arm or the leg.
- D. This underestimates the involved regions; it would correspond to only the trunk and arm or two leg surfaces.
- E. This overestimates the burned area; it would require more body regions to be involved.
A 45-year-old man sustains a circumferential full-thickness burn of the right forearm in an industrial accident. Two hours after fluid resuscitation is initiated, he reports worsening pain in the hand. Examination shows a dusky, cool right hand with absent radial pulse by Doppler and decreased sensation in the fingers. The forearm compartments are tense. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AIncrease the rate of intravenous fluid resuscitation
- BAdminister intravenous heparin
- CElevate the extremity and reassess in 1 hour
- DPerform escharotomy of the forearm
- EObtain compartment pressure measurement before any intervention
Show answer
Circumferential full-thickness burns create a rigid, inelastic eschar that does not expand as underlying tissue edema develops, leading to a tourniquet-like effect that compromises distal perfusion. Signs of vascular compromise, including absent pulses, pallor or duskiness, and paresthesias, are an indication for emergent escharotomy, a surgical incision through the eschar down to subcutaneous fat to relieve pressure. This is distinct from fasciotomy, which is reserved for compartment syndrome from causes other than the burned eschar itself. Delay in decompression risks irreversible ischemia and limb loss.
- A. Increasing fluids will not relieve the mechanical constriction caused by the rigid eschar.
- B. Anticoagulation does not address the mechanical compression caused by the eschar.
- C. Delaying intervention with elevation risks progression to irreversible ischemia given current pulselessness.
- E. Clinical findings of ischemia already warrant immediate decompression; measurement would only delay necessary treatment.
Acute Abdomen: Appendicitis & RLQ
3 questionsA 22-year-old man presents with 14 hours of abdominal pain. The pain began as vague periumbilical discomfort and migrated to the right lower quadrant over the past several hours, accompanied by nausea and anorexia. Temperature is 37.9°C (100.2°F), heart rate 98/min, blood pressure 122/78 mmHg. Abdominal examination shows tenderness and voluntary guarding at a point one-third the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus. Rebound tenderness is present at this location. Leukocyte count is 13,800/mm³ with 82% neutrophils. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- AOvarian torsion
- BAcute diverticulitis
- CMesenteric lymphadenitis
- DAcute appendicitis
- EMeckel diverticulitis
Show answer
This presentation is classic for acute appendicitis: periumbilical visceral pain that migrates to the right lower quadrant as localized parietal peritoneal irritation develops, accompanied by anorexia, low-grade fever, and leukocytosis with neutrophil predominance. Tenderness at McBurney point, located one-third of the way from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus, along with rebound tenderness and guarding, reflects localized peritoneal inflammation over the appendix. The classic migratory pain pattern has a high positive predictive value for appendicitis when present. In a young man without gynecologic organs, this history and examination strongly favor appendicitis over the other listed diagnoses.
- A. Ovarian torsion occurs in women and presents with sudden severe unilateral pelvic pain, not applicable to this male patient.
- B. Diverticulitis classically presents with left lower quadrant pain, not periumbilical pain migrating to the right lower quadrant.
- C. Mesenteric lymphadenitis typically follows a viral illness and lacks the classic migratory pain pattern and peritoneal signs described here.
- E. Meckel diverticulitis is a rare cause of lower abdominal pain, typically presenting with painless bleeding or an appendicitis-like picture in children, and is far less common than appendicitis.
A 34-year-old man presents with 18 hours of right lower quadrant abdominal pain, nausea, and anorexia. He is not obese. Temperature is 38.1°C (100.6°F), heart rate 102/min. Examination shows tenderness and guarding in the right lower quadrant with a positive psoas sign. Leukocyte count is 14,500/mm³. The diagnosis of appendicitis is being considered but is not clinically certain. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step to confirm the diagnosis in this patient?
- ADiagnostic laparoscopy
- BAbdominal ultrasound
- CMRI of the abdomen and pelvis without contrast
- DContrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis
- EPlain abdominal radiograph
Show answer
In nonpregnant adults with equivocal clinical findings for appendicitis, contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and pelvis is the most accurate imaging study, with sensitivity and specificity both exceeding 95%. CT can identify an enlarged, inflamed appendix, periappendiceal fat stranding, and complications such as abscess or perforation, and it also helps evaluate alternative diagnoses when the appendix is not clearly visualized. Ultrasound is preferred as the initial test in children and pregnant women to avoid ionizing radiation, but it is operator-dependent and less sensitive in adults, particularly in those who are obese. MRI without contrast is reserved for pregnant patients when ultrasound is inconclusive.
- A. Diagnostic laparoscopy is invasive and reserved for cases where imaging is unavailable, inconclusive, or when proceeding directly to surgery is already planned.
- B. Ultrasound is preferred in children and pregnant women but has lower sensitivity than CT in nonpregnant adults.
- C. MRI is reserved mainly for pregnant patients with inconclusive ultrasound, not as a first-line test in this patient.
- E. Plain radiographs have poor sensitivity and specificity for appendicitis and are not used to confirm the diagnosis.
A 48-year-old woman presents with 5 days of right lower quadrant pain, fever, and anorexia. Temperature is 38.6°C (101.5°F), heart rate 104/min, blood pressure 118/76 mmHg. Examination shows a tender, palpable right lower quadrant mass with localized guarding but no diffuse peritonitis. Leukocyte count is 16,200/mm³. CT of the abdomen and pelvis shows a perforated appendix with a 6-cm periappendiceal abscess and no free intraperitoneal fluid. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AImmediate laparoscopic appendectomy
- BImmediate open appendectomy
- CImage-guided percutaneous drainage of the abscess and intravenous antibiotics
- DExploratory laparotomy with right hemicolectomy
- ETotal parenteral nutrition and observation without intervention
Show answer
In patients with perforated appendicitis complicated by a well-formed periappendiceal abscess and no diffuse peritonitis, the preferred initial management is image-guided percutaneous drainage combined with intravenous antibiotics, followed by interval appendectomy 6 to 8 weeks later once inflammation has resolved. Immediate surgery in this setting is technically difficult due to dense inflammatory adhesions and carries higher rates of complications such as bowel injury, incomplete resection, and fistula formation. This nonoperative approach controls sepsis while avoiding a hazardous dissection in acutely inflamed tissue. Immediate appendectomy is reserved for simple (nonperforated) appendicitis or when the patient has diffuse peritonitis or clinical deterioration despite drainage.
- A. Laparoscopic appendectomy in this inflamed field is also technically difficult and risky; drainage is preferred initially.
- B. Immediate surgery in a densely inflamed, abscessed field carries higher risk of bowel injury and complications compared to drainage first.
- D. Hemicolectomy is an excessive and inappropriate procedure for appendiceal pathology; it is not indicated here.
- E. Observation alone without source control is inadequate given the ongoing abscess and systemic signs of infection.
Acute Abdomen: Biliary Disease
6 questionsA 52-year-old woman presents with 8 hours of constant right upper quadrant pain that began after eating a fatty meal, associated with nausea and vomiting. She reports several similar episodes in the past that resolved within 2 to 3 hours. Temperature is 38.4°C (101.1°F), heart rate 100/min, blood pressure 124/80 mmHg. Examination shows right upper quadrant tenderness with inspiratory arrest on deep palpation under the costal margin. Leukocyte count is 14,800/mm³ with 80% neutrophils. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- AAcute cholecystitis
- BAcute pancreatitis
- CCholedocholithiasis
- DBiliary colic
- EAscending cholangitis
Show answer
Acute cholecystitis is distinguished from simple biliary colic by the presence of fever, leukocytosis, and a positive Murphy sign (inspiratory arrest due to pain when the inflamed gallbladder contacts the examining hand), combined with pain lasting longer than the typical few hours seen in uncomplicated biliary colic. Biliary colic results from transient cystic duct obstruction by a gallstone and resolves once the stone passes or dislodges, without systemic inflammatory signs. The persistence of pain beyond 6 hours along with fever and neutrophilic leukocytosis indicates ongoing inflammation of the gallbladder wall rather than a self-limited episode. This patient's prior self-resolving episodes represent earlier biliary colic, while this presentation reflects progression to cholecystitis.
- B. Acute pancreatitis typically presents with epigastric pain radiating to the back and markedly elevated lipase, not isolated right upper quadrant findings with Murphy sign.
- C. Choledocholithiasis classically presents with jaundice and elevated bilirubin from common bile duct obstruction, which is not described here.
- D. Biliary colic is typically self-limited, lasting a few hours, and does not cause fever or significant leukocytosis as seen here.
- E. Ascending cholangitis presents with Charcot triad (fever, jaundice, right upper quadrant pain) or Reynolds pentad, and jaundice is not present in this patient.
A 45-year-old woman presents with 10 hours of right upper quadrant pain, fever, and vomiting. Temperature is 38.3°C (100.9°F), heart rate 96/min, blood pressure 126/82 mmHg. Examination shows right upper quadrant tenderness with a positive Murphy sign. Leukocyte count is 15,200/mm³. Total bilirubin and liver enzymes are within normal limits. What is the most appropriate next step to confirm the diagnosis?
- AHepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan
- BEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
- CMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)
- DCT of the abdomen and pelvis with contrast
- ERight upper quadrant ultrasound
Show answer
Right upper quadrant ultrasound is the best initial imaging test for suspected acute cholecystitis because it is widely available, rapid, inexpensive, and avoids ionizing radiation, with good sensitivity and specificity for detecting gallstones, gallbladder wall thickening greater than 3 mm, pericholecystic fluid, and a sonographic Murphy sign. These findings together support the diagnosis in most patients without need for further testing. HIDA scan has higher sensitivity for acute cholecystitis but is reserved for cases where ultrasound findings are equivocal, since it takes longer and involves radioisotope administration. CT and MRCP are more useful for evaluating complications or common bile duct pathology rather than as first-line tests for cholecystitis.
- A. HIDA scan is more accurate but reserved as a second-line test when ultrasound findings are equivocal, due to longer study time and radiotracer use.
- B. ERCP is a therapeutic procedure for bile duct stones or obstruction, not a first-line diagnostic test for cholecystitis.
- C. MRCP is primarily used to evaluate suspected choledocholithiasis or bile duct abnormalities, not as the initial test for cholecystitis.
- D. CT is less sensitive than ultrasound for gallstones and is not first-line for suspected cholecystitis.
A 52-year-old woman presents with 18 hours of right upper quadrant pain, nausea, and fever. Temperature is 38.2°C (100.8°F), heart rate 98/min, and blood pressure 126/78 mmHg. She has voluntary guarding and a positive Murphy sign. Leukocyte count is 13,800/mm³. Abdominal ultrasound shows a distended gallbladder with a 1.2-cm stone impacted in the neck, wall thickening of 5 mm, and pericholecystic fluid. She is started on IV fluids and piperacillin-tazobactam. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AEmergent ERCP with sphincterotomy
- BElective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 6 weeks
- CPercutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement
- DLaparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours of symptom onset
- EContinue antibiotics alone and reimage in 48 hours
Show answer
This patient has acute calculous cholecystitis diagnosed by clinical findings (fever, Murphy sign) and ultrasound (wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, impacted stone). Current guidelines recommend early laparoscopic cholecystectomy, ideally within 72 hours of symptom onset, as this reduces hospital stay and complications compared with delayed surgery, without increasing conversion-to-open rates when performed by experienced surgeons. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is reserved for patients who are poor surgical candidates due to severe comorbidity or septic shock. ERCP is indicated for choledocholithiasis or cholangitis, not isolated cholecystitis without bile duct obstruction.
- A. There is no evidence of choledocholithiasis or cholangitis requiring duct decompression.
- B. Delayed surgery is associated with longer hospital stay and higher conversion rates compared with early surgery.
- C. Reserved for patients who are too unstable or high-risk for surgery, not this stable patient.
- E. Delaying surgery with antibiotics alone increases risk of complications such as gallbladder perforation.
A 68-year-old man presents to the emergency department with 2 days of right upper quadrant pain and fever. Temperature is 39.4°C (102.9°F), heart rate 118/min, blood pressure 88/56 mmHg, and respiratory rate 24/min. He is confused and oriented only to person. Scleral icterus is present, and the abdomen is tender in the right upper quadrant without rebound. Laboratory studies show total bilirubin 4.8 mg/dL, alkaline phosphatase 310 U/L, and leukocyte count 19,200/mm³. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- AAcute calculous cholecystitis
- BHepatic abscess
- CAcute cholangitis with features of Reynolds pentad
- DAcute viral hepatitis
- EPerforated peptic ulcer
Show answer
This patient has fever, jaundice, and right upper quadrant pain (Charcot triad) plus hypotension and altered mental status, completing Reynolds pentad, which indicates severe, suppurative acute cholangitis. This occurs when bacterial infection develops proximal to an obstructed common bile duct, most commonly from choledocholithiasis, causing biliary stasis, bacterial overgrowth, and systemic sepsis. Reynolds pentad signifies a surgical emergency requiring urgent resuscitation, antibiotics, and biliary decompression. Cholecystitis typically does not cause significant jaundice or hyperbilirubinemia unless Mirizzi syndrome is present.
- A. Jaundice and markedly elevated bilirubin are not typical of isolated cholecystitis without duct obstruction.
- B. A hepatic abscess may cause fever and right upper quadrant pain but does not classically produce this pentad of findings.
- D. Viral hepatitis does not typically cause this degree of leukocytosis, hypotension, or altered mental status.
- E. Perforated ulcer causes diffuse peritonitis with rebound tenderness and free air, not isolated jaundice with fever.
A 71-year-old woman is admitted with acute cholangitis. On arrival, temperature was 39.1°C (102.4°F), heart rate 124/min, and blood pressure 82/50 mmHg. She received 2 L of IV crystalloid, broad-spectrum IV antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactam), and now has a heart rate of 96/min and blood pressure 108/68 mmHg. Total bilirubin remains 6.2 mg/dL, and abdominal ultrasound shows a dilated common bile duct with a stone at the distal end. She remains febrile but is hemodynamically stable. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AElective laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiogram
- BContinue antibiotics and reassess in 1 week
- CPercutaneous transhepatic cholangiography only, without drainage
- DCT angiography of the abdomen
- EUrgent ERCP with biliary decompression
Show answer
Once initial resuscitation with IV fluids and antibiotics has stabilized a patient with acute cholangitis, urgent biliary decompression is required to relieve the obstruction and control the source of infection. ERCP with sphincterotomy and stone extraction (or stent placement) is the preferred method because it is minimally invasive and allows simultaneous diagnosis and treatment. Delaying decompression risks recurrent sepsis and progression to multiorgan failure. Cholecystectomy does not address the ductal obstruction and is performed later, after biliary drainage, if the gallbladder remains in situ.
- A. Cholecystectomy addresses gallbladder disease, not the common bile duct obstruction causing cholangitis.
- B. Antibiotics alone do not relieve the biliary obstruction driving the infection; decompression is required.
- C. Diagnostic cholangiography without drainage fails to relieve the obstruction causing ongoing sepsis.
- D. CT angiography does not evaluate or treat biliary obstruction and is not indicated here.
A 45-year-old woman presents with intermittent right upper quadrant pain and dark urine for 3 days. She is afebrile with heart rate 78/min and blood pressure 122/76 mmHg. Examination shows mild right upper quadrant tenderness without guarding. Laboratory studies show total bilirubin 3.4 mg/dL, direct bilirubin 2.6 mg/dL, alkaline phosphatase 285 U/L, and AST/ALT mildly elevated. Transabdominal ultrasound shows gallstones and a common bile duct diameter of 10 mm, but the distal duct is not well visualized due to bowel gas. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step to confirm the diagnosis?
- ACT scan of the abdomen with contrast
- BHepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan
- CEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
- DMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
- EPercutaneous transhepatic cholangiography
Show answer
This patient has clinical and laboratory evidence suggestive of choledocholithiasis (elevated bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase, dilated common bile duct) but without signs of cholangitis or hemodynamic compromise, so a noninvasive confirmatory test is preferred before proceeding to an invasive intervention. MRCP is the best noninvasive imaging modality, offering high sensitivity and specificity for common bile duct stones without the risks of ERCP, such as pancreatitis or perforation. ERCP is reserved for therapeutic intervention once choledocholithiasis is confirmed, or used diagnostically when clinical suspicion is very high and intervention is anticipated.
- A. CT is less sensitive than MRCP for detecting common bile duct stones, which may be isodense with bile.
- B. HIDA scan assesses gallbladder function and cystic duct patency, not common bile duct stones.
- C. ERCP carries procedural risks (pancreatitis, perforation) and is better reserved for confirmed or highly likely stones requiring therapeutic extraction.
- E. This invasive procedure is used for biliary drainage when ERCP is not feasible, not as an initial diagnostic test.
Acute Abdomen: Pancreas & Hernia
5 questionsA 39-year-old man with a history of heavy alcohol use presents with 12 hours of severe epigastric pain radiating to the back, accompanied by nausea and vomiting. Temperature is 37.6°C (99.7°F), heart rate 104/min, and blood pressure 118/74 mmHg. The abdomen is tender in the epigastrium with voluntary guarding but no rebound. Serum lipase is 310 U/L (reference range 10-140 U/L). An abdominal ultrasound performed in the emergency department shows no gallstones and poor visualization of the pancreas due to bowel gas. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- APerforated duodenal ulcer
- BBiliary colic
- CAcute pancreatitis
- DAcute mesenteric ischemia
- EAcute gastritis
Show answer
The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis requires at least 2 of 3 criteria: characteristic abdominal pain (epigastric pain radiating to the back), serum lipase or amylase greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal, and/or characteristic findings on imaging. This patient meets 2 criteria (typical pain and lipase elevation greater than 3 times normal), making imaging unnecessary to confirm the diagnosis. Alcohol use is a leading etiology of acute pancreatitis, along with gallstones. Perforated ulcer and mesenteric ischemia typically present with peritoneal signs or more diffuse pain rather than isolated epigastric pain with this degree of lipase elevation.
- A. Perforation typically causes rigid, board-like abdomen with rebound tenderness and free air on imaging, not isolated lipase elevation.
- B. Biliary colic causes right upper quadrant pain without significant lipase elevation and this patient's ultrasound shows no gallstones.
- D. Mesenteric ischemia classically presents with pain out of proportion to exam findings and often in older patients with vascular risk factors, not isolated lipase elevation.
- E. Gastritis does not cause lipase elevation of this magnitude or pain radiating to the back.
A 44-year-old woman is admitted with acute pancreatitis confirmed by epigastric pain and a serum lipase of 620 U/L (reference range 10-140 U/L). She has no gallstones on ultrasound and denies alcohol use; triglycerides are normal. Heart rate is 108/min, blood pressure 102/64 mmHg, and she appears mildly dehydrated with dry mucous membranes. She has mild epigastric tenderness without peritoneal signs and is tolerating sips of water without vomiting. Which of the following is the most appropriate initial management?
- ATotal parenteral nutrition started on admission
- BIV antibiotics empirically to prevent infected necrosis
- CNasogastric tube placement for continuous gastric decompression
- DAggressive IV isotonic crystalloid resuscitation with early initiation of oral or enteral feeding as tolerated
- EStrict nil per os until amylase and lipase normalize completely
Show answer
Initial management of acute pancreatitis centers on aggressive IV isotonic fluid resuscitation (typically lactated Ringer's) to correct third-space losses and prevent pancreatic hypoperfusion, combined with early initiation of oral or enteral feeding as tolerated, usually within 24-72 hours. Early feeding supports gut mucosal integrity, reduces bacterial translocation, and is associated with lower rates of infectious complications compared with prolonged bowel rest. Enzyme levels do not need to normalize before feeding is resumed. Prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended in the absence of documented infection, and routine nasogastric decompression is not beneficial unless there is significant ileus or intractable vomiting.
- A. Enteral feeding is preferred over parenteral nutrition when the gut can be used, as it reduces infectious complications and cost.
- B. Prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended in acute pancreatitis without evidence of infection.
- C. Routine nasogastric decompression has not been shown to improve outcomes and is reserved for severe ileus or vomiting.
- E. Prolonged fasting until enzymes normalize is unnecessary and delays recovery; feeding should resume as symptoms allow.
A 56-year-old man with severe acute pancreatitis has been hospitalized for 12 days. He now develops a new fever of 38.9°C (102°F), heart rate 112/min, and blood pressure 104/66 mmHg, with worsening leukocytosis (22,000/mm³) and increasing abdominal distension. A contrast-enhanced CT scan of the abdomen shows a large peripancreatic fluid collection with gas bubbles within necrotic pancreatic tissue. Blood cultures are pending. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AContinue IV fluids and antibiotics without intervention
- BImmediate open surgical necrosectomy
- CRepeat CT scan in 2 weeks to reassess
- DCT-guided percutaneous drainage with image-guided or endoscopic step-up approach
- EERCP with pancreatic duct stenting
Show answer
Gas within a peripancreatic fluid collection on CT is highly suggestive of infected pancreatic necrosis, and combined with clinical signs of sepsis (fever, leukocytosis, tachycardia), intervention is indicated. Current guidelines recommend a minimally invasive step-up approach, beginning with image-guided (percutaneous or endoscopic) drainage, reserving open surgical necrosectomy for cases that fail to improve with less invasive measures. This approach reduces morbidity and mortality compared with immediate open surgery. Delaying intervention in the setting of infected necrosis with sepsis risks clinical deterioration and multiorgan failure.
- A. Infected necrosis with sepsis requires source control through drainage; antibiotics alone are insufficient.
- B. Immediate open necrosectomy is associated with higher morbidity and mortality compared with a step-up minimally invasive approach and is reserved for cases failing less invasive therapy.
- C. Delaying intervention in the setting of infected necrosis with sepsis risks clinical deterioration.
- E. ERCP addresses ductal pathology, not infected necrotic peripancreatic collections.
A 67-year-old man presents with a 6-hour history of severe pain and a tender bulge in the right groin that he has had intermittently for several months but now cannot reduce. Temperature is 38.3°C (100.9°F), heart rate 118/min, and blood pressure 108/70 mmHg. Examination shows a firm, exquisitely tender, erythematous mass in the right groin that does not reduce with gentle pressure; the overlying skin appears mottled and dusky. Leukocyte count is 17,500/mm³ with a lactate of 3.8 mmol/L. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- AIncarcerated inguinal hernia without strangulation
- BTesticular torsion
- CStrangulated inguinal hernia
- DFemoral lymphadenitis
- EReducible inguinal hernia with overlying cellulitis
Show answer
A strangulated hernia occurs when incarceration compromises blood supply to the herniated bowel, leading to ischemia and potential necrosis. Features distinguishing strangulation from simple incarceration include systemic toxicity (fever, tachycardia), skin changes overlying the hernia (erythema, dusky or mottled discoloration), and elevated lactate indicating tissue ischemia, all present in this patient. This presentation constitutes a surgical emergency requiring immediate operative exploration, in contrast to simple incarceration, which may sometimes be reduced manually without emergent surgery. Delay in recognizing strangulation risks bowel necrosis, perforation, and sepsis.
- A. Incarceration without strangulation lacks systemic toxicity, skin discoloration, and elevated lactate indicating ischemia.
- B. Testicular torsion presents with scrotal rather than groin bulge and a high-riding, horizontally-lying testis.
- D. Lymphadenitis presents as discrete tender nodes, not an irreducible groin bulge with overlying skin necrosis.
- E. Cellulitis alone would not cause mottled, dusky skin changes with a firm irreducible mass and elevated lactate.
A 58-year-old man comes to the office for evaluation of a bulge in his right groin that he first noticed 4 months ago. It increases with standing and straining and disappears when he lies down. He reports mild discomfort with heavy lifting but no pain at rest, nausea, or vomiting. Vital signs are normal. Examination shows a soft, non-tender bulge in the right inguinal region that reduces easily with gentle pressure; the overlying skin is normal, and there is no erythema or tenderness on palpation of the mass. Bowel sounds are normal.
- ASchedule elective outpatient hernia repair
- BRefer for immediate reduction under procedural sedation in the emergency department
- CPrescribe a scrotal support truss and reassess in 6 months
- DObtain CT of the abdomen and pelvis before deciding on repair
- EAdmit for emergent surgical exploration
Show answer
A reducible, asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia without signs of incarceration or strangulation (no pain at rest, no overlying skin changes, easily reducible) can be managed with elective outpatient repair. Emergent surgery is reserved for incarcerated or strangulated hernias with signs of bowel compromise such as severe pain, tenderness, erythema, or obstructive symptoms. Watchful waiting is an option in minimally symptomatic patients but elective repair is generally preferred to prevent future incarceration and because surgical risk is low. No imaging is needed when the diagnosis is clear on physical exam.
- B. There is no incarceration requiring emergency reduction; this is an elective, not emergent, problem.
- C. A truss does not fix the hernia and delays definitive treatment without benefit in a surgical candidate.
- D. CT is unnecessary when the diagnosis is established by physical examination alone.
- E. Emergent surgery is reserved for incarcerated or strangulated hernias, not an easily reducible one.
Acute Abdomen: Bowel Obstruction & Ischemia
6 questionsA 62-year-old woman comes to the emergency department with crampy abdominal pain, distension, and vomiting for 1 day. She underwent an open hysterectomy 10 years ago. Temperature is 37.1°C (98.8°F), blood pressure is 128/78 mmHg, pulse is 92/min, and respirations are 18/min. The abdomen is distended and tympanic with high-pitched bowel sounds; there is mild diffuse tenderness without rebound or guarding. A healed Pfannenstiel scar is noted. Laboratory studies show a leukocyte count of 9,800/mm³ and normal lactate. Upright abdominal x-ray shows multiple dilated loops of small bowel with air-fluid levels arranged in a stepladder pattern and a paucity of gas in the colon.
- AAcute pancreatitis
- BAcute mesenteric ischemia
- CSmall bowel obstruction due to adhesions
- DPerforated peptic ulcer
- ESigmoid volvulus
Show answer
Dilated small bowel loops with air-fluid levels in a stepladder pattern, colonic gas paucity, and a history of prior abdominal surgery are classic for small bowel obstruction caused by postoperative adhesions, the most common cause of SBO in adults. The lack of peritoneal signs, normal lactate, and mild leukocytosis suggest a simple, non-strangulated obstruction. Adhesions account for over 50-70% of SBO cases, most often following pelvic or lower abdominal surgery. Plain films showing the stepladder sign support the diagnosis before further imaging confirms the transition point.
- A. Pancreatitis causes epigastric pain with elevated lipase, not this obstructive pattern.
- B. Mesenteric ischemia typically causes pain out of proportion to exam and elevated lactate, not seen here.
- D. Perforated ulcer presents with free air and peritonitis, not seen on this film or exam.
- E. Sigmoid volvulus shows a coffee bean sign on x-ray, not stepladder small bowel dilation.
A 70-year-old man is admitted with partial small bowel obstruction confirmed on CT, showing a transition point in the mid-ileum with proximal dilation up to 3.5 cm and distal decompressed bowel with some gas passing into the colon. He has had two prior laparotomies for diverticulitis. Temperature is 37.0°C (98.6°F), blood pressure is 122/76 mmHg, and pulse is 84/min. The abdomen is distended but soft, with no rebound or guarding. Leukocyte count is 8,200/mm³ and lactate is 0.9 mmol/L (normal). He has passed flatus but not had a bowel movement in 2 days.
- AWater-soluble contrast enema to assess colonic transit
- BImmediate exploratory laparotomy with adhesiolysis
- CEmergent CT angiography of the mesenteric vessels
- DOral polyethylene glycol bowel preparation followed by colonoscopy
- ENasogastric tube decompression, NPO status, and IV fluid resuscitation
Show answer
In a hemodynamically stable patient with partial SBO and no signs of strangulation (normal lactate, no peritonitis, afebrile, passing flatus), initial management is nonoperative: nasogastric decompression, bowel rest, and IV fluid resuscitation with correction of electrolyte abnormalities. Most partial SBO episodes from adhesions resolve with conservative management, avoiding the risks of repeat surgery. Serial abdominal exams and monitoring for resolution or progression guide the decision to proceed to surgery if the obstruction fails to resolve or signs of ischemia develop.
- A. A contrast enema evaluates the colon, not the small bowel obstruction identified here.
- B. Immediate surgery is not indicated for a stable partial SBO without peritonitis or ischemia; trial of conservative management comes first.
- C. There is no clinical suspicion for mesenteric ischemia; lactate and exam are reassuring.
- D. Bowel prep and colonoscopy are inappropriate and risky in active small bowel obstruction.
A 68-year-old woman with known adhesive small bowel obstruction, initially managed with nasogastric decompression, develops worsening abdominal pain over the next 18 hours. Temperature is 38.6°C (101.5°F), blood pressure is 102/64 mmHg, and pulse is 118/min. The abdomen is distended with diffuse tenderness, involuntary guarding, and rebound tenderness. Bowel sounds are absent. Leukocyte count has risen from 9,000/mm³ to 19,500/mm³, and lactate is 4.2 mmol/L (reference range 0.5-2.2 mmol/L).
- ATrial of intravenous neostigmine
- BWater-soluble contrast study to assess for resolution
- CContinue nasogastric decompression and repeat abdominal x-ray in 12 hours
- DStart total parenteral nutrition and observe for 48 hours
- EEmergent exploratory laparotomy
Show answer
New fever, tachycardia, peritoneal signs (guarding, rebound tenderness), rising leukocytosis, and elevated lactate in a patient with SBO indicate bowel strangulation with ischemia or impending perforation. This is a surgical emergency requiring prompt resuscitation and emergent exploratory laparotomy to resect nonviable bowel and relieve the obstruction, since delay increases the risk of perforation, sepsis, and death. Continued nonoperative management is contraindicated once signs of strangulation appear.
- A. Neostigmine treats colonic pseudo-obstruction (Ogilvie syndrome), not strangulated SBO.
- B. Contrast studies are not indicated and delay necessary surgical intervention in this emergency.
- C. Continued observation delays definitive treatment in a patient with signs of bowel ischemia or perforation.
- D. TPN and prolonged observation are inappropriate when strangulation is suspected; surgery should not be delayed.
A 76-year-old woman with a history of atrial fibrillation, not on anticoagulation, comes to the emergency department with severe, diffuse abdominal pain that began suddenly 3 hours ago. She describes the pain as 9 out of 10 and constant. Temperature is 37.4°C (99.3°F), blood pressure is 142/88 mmHg, and pulse is 128/min and irregular. The abdomen is soft, mildly distended, and only mildly tender to palpation, with no rebound or guarding; bowel sounds are hypoactive. Stool is positive for occult blood. Leukocyte count is 16,000/mm³ and serum lactate is 3.8 mmol/L (reference range 0.5-2.2 mmol/L).
- AAcute appendicitis
- BPerforated peptic ulcer
- CDiverticulitis
- DAcute mesenteric ischemia
- ESigmoid volvulus
Show answer
Severe abdominal pain that is disproportionate to the relatively benign findings on physical examination, in a patient with atrial fibrillation and no anticoagulation (a source of embolus), strongly suggests acute mesenteric ischemia from embolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery. Elevated lactate and leukocytosis reflect early bowel ischemia, and occult blood in the stool reflects mucosal sloughing. Early recognition is critical because the exam often underestimates the severity of ischemia, and delayed diagnosis leads to bowel infarction, perforation, and high mortality.
- A. Appendicitis causes localized right lower quadrant pain and tenderness, not diffuse pain out of proportion to exam.
- B. Perforated ulcer causes diffuse peritonitis with rigid abdomen and free air, not this pattern of pain out of proportion with a soft abdomen.
- C. Diverticulitis typically causes localized left lower quadrant pain with tenderness correlating with exam findings.
- E. Volvulus presents with progressive distension and obstructive symptoms, not sudden severe pain with a source of embolism.
A 71-year-old man with a history of atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease comes to the emergency department with sudden-onset severe abdominal pain for 4 hours. He appears uncomfortable but the abdomen is soft with only mild tenderness on palpation, out of proportion to his reported pain severity. Temperature is 37.6°C (99.7°F), blood pressure is 118/70 mmHg, and pulse is 110/min and irregularly irregular. Leukocyte count is 17,200/mm³ and lactate is 4.5 mmol/L (reference range 0.5-2.2 mmol/L). There is no peritonitis on exam.
- AColonoscopy
- BAbdominal ultrasound with Doppler of mesenteric vessels
- CCT angiography of the abdomen
- DPlain abdominal x-ray series
- EUpper gastrointestinal endoscopy
Show answer
CT angiography of the abdomen is the best initial diagnostic test for suspected acute mesenteric ischemia in a hemodynamically stable patient, as it rapidly identifies arterial or venous occlusion, bowel wall changes, and signs of infarction or perforation with high sensitivity and specificity. It allows prompt diagnosis and guides decisions between endovascular intervention and surgical exploration. Catheter-based angiography remains useful for selected cases but CT angiography has become first-line due to its speed and ability to simultaneously evaluate the bowel.
- A. Colonoscopy is not appropriate in suspected acute ischemia and risks perforation in compromised bowel.
- B. Doppler ultrasound is limited by bowel gas and operator dependence and is not the preferred test for mesenteric ischemia.
- D. Plain x-ray may show nonspecific findings like ileus or thumbprinting but cannot reliably diagnose vascular occlusion.
- E. Upper endoscopy evaluates the stomach and duodenum, not the mesenteric vasculature or distal small bowel.
A 54-year-old man with a history of chronic NSAID use for back pain comes to the emergency department with sudden, severe epigastric pain that began 2 hours ago and has since become diffuse. He appears pale and diaphoretic. Temperature is 38.1°C (100.6°F), blood pressure is 96/58 mmHg, and pulse is 122/min. The abdomen is rigid with diffuse rebound tenderness and guarding; bowel sounds are absent. Leukocyte count is 18,500/mm³. Upright chest x-ray shows a thin crescent of air beneath the right hemidiaphragm.
- AIntravenous proton pump inhibitor and observation for 24 hours
- BUpper endoscopy to localize the bleeding site
- CEmergent exploratory laparotomy
- DNasogastric decompression and serial abdominal exams
- ECT angiography of the mesenteric vessels
Show answer
Sudden severe abdominal pain, a rigid board-like abdomen with diffuse peritonitis, hemodynamic instability, and free air under the diaphragm on upright chest x-ray are classic for perforated peptic ulcer, a surgical emergency. Chronic NSAID use is a major risk factor for peptic ulcer disease and perforation. Management requires immediate fluid resuscitation, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and emergent surgical exploration, typically with omental patch repair (Graham patch) of the perforation, as delay increases mortality from peritonitis and sepsis.
- A. PPI alone does not address an active perforation; definitive surgical repair is required emergently.
- B. Endoscopy is contraindicated in a perforated viscus because insufflation worsens peritoneal contamination.
- D. Nonoperative management is inappropriate once perforation with peritonitis and free air is confirmed.
- E. CT angiography evaluates vascular occlusion, not the free air and peritonitis seen here, and would delay necessary surgery.
[Acute Abdomen: Diverticulitis]
1 questionsA 64-year-old man is hospitalized for acute diverticulitis. He has persistent fever and left lower quadrant pain despite 48 hours of intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam. Temperature is 38.6°C (101.5°F), pulse is 104/min, and blood pressure is 118/76 mm Hg. Abdominal examination shows left lower quadrant tenderness with a palpable mass. White blood cell count is 16,200/mm³. CT scan shows a 5.5-cm pericolic fluid collection adjacent to a thickened sigmoid colon, with no evidence of diffuse peritonitis or free perforation.
- ACT-guided percutaneous drainage of the abscess
- BContinue current antibiotics and observe
- CEmergent exploratory laparotomy with sigmoid resection
- DColonoscopy to evaluate the sigmoid colon
- ELaparoscopic drainage and peritoneal lavage only
Show answer
This patient has a diverticular abscess larger than 4 cm that has failed to respond to antibiotics alone, which is an indication for image-guided percutaneous drainage combined with continued intravenous antibiotics. Abscesses smaller than 3-4 cm often resolve with antibiotics alone, while larger collections typically require drainage to achieve source control. Percutaneous drainage can often allow the acute episode to resolve, with elective sigmoid resection considered afterward if the patient has recurrent or complicated disease. Emergency surgery is reserved for patients with diffuse peritonitis, free perforation, or failure of percutaneous drainage.
- B. Continued observation alone is inappropriate given the large abscess size and failure of antibiotic therapy alone.
- C. Emergent laparotomy is reserved for diffuse peritonitis or failed drainage, not an isolated drainable abscess.
- D. Colonoscopy is contraindicated in the acute setting due to perforation risk and should be deferred 6-8 weeks after resolution.
- E. Laparoscopic lavage without resection is not standard first-line management when a percutaneous route is feasible.
[Postoperative Care & Complications]
6 questionsA 70-year-old man develops a fever of 38.9°C (102°F) on postoperative day 6 following an open sigmoid colectomy for perforated diverticulitis. Pulse is 108/min and blood pressure is 106/68 mm Hg. He reports increasing abdominal pain and distension. The surgical incision appears clean without erythema or drainage. Bowel sounds are hypoactive. White blood cell count is 17,500/mm³. Lower extremities show no swelling or tenderness.
- ADeep venous thrombosis
- BSuperficial wound infection
- CAtelectasis
- DUrinary tract infection
- EIntra-abdominal abscess
Show answer
Postoperative fever follows a rough timeline often remembered as the "5 W's": wind (atelectasis, postoperative days 1-2), water (urinary tract infection, days 3-5), walking (DVT, days 4-6), wound (surgical site infection, days 5-7), and wonder drugs/deep abscess (intra-abdominal abscess, typically after day 5-7 or later). This patient's fever on day 6, combined with abdominal pain, distension, and a clean incision, is most consistent with an intra-abdominal abscess, a recognized complication after colonic surgery, especially after a case involving perforation and contamination. Imaging with CT of the abdomen and pelvis would be the appropriate next step to confirm and guide drainage. The absence of leg swelling and a clean wound makes the other causes less likely.
- A. DVT usually presents around days 4-6 with unilateral leg swelling and tenderness, which this patient does not have.
- B. The incision is described as clean without erythema or drainage, making superficial wound infection unlikely.
- C. Atelectasis typically presents within the first 1-2 postoperative days with fever and often with decreased breath sounds, not matching this later presentation.
- D. Urinary tract infection classically occurs around postoperative days 3-5 and would present with urinary symptoms, which are absent here.
A 55-year-old woman is postoperative day 4 after an open hysterectomy for a large fibroid uterus. She had an initial return of flatus on postoperative day 2 and was tolerating a regular diet, but today develops new-onset nausea, vomiting, and absence of flatus for 24 hours. Temperature is 37.2°C (99°F), pulse is 88/min, and blood pressure is 122/78 mm Hg. Abdomen is distended and tympanic with high-pitched bowel sounds. Abdominal X-ray shows multiple dilated small bowel loops with air-fluid levels and a transition point, with a paucity of gas in the distal colon.
- APostoperative ileus; continue nasogastric decompression and bowel rest
- BAnastomotic leak; obtain CT with oral contrast
- CEarly mechanical small bowel obstruction; trial of nasogastric decompression and serial exams
- DAcute mesenteric ischemia; emergent laparotomy
- EPostoperative ileus; start metoclopramide and early ambulation
Show answer
This patient had an initial return of bowel function (flatus on day 2, tolerating diet) followed by a new onset of obstructive symptoms with a transition point and distal decompression on imaging, which is characteristic of early postoperative mechanical small bowel obstruction rather than ileus. Postoperative ileus typically presents immediately after surgery with diffuse bowel distension and no transition point, and does not follow a period of normal bowel function. Early mechanical SBO within 6 weeks of surgery, often from adhesions, is initially managed conservatively with nasogastric decompression, bowel rest, and serial abdominal examinations, since many cases resolve without surgery. Indications for surgery include signs of strangulation, peritonitis, or failure of conservative management after several days.
- A. Ileus is inconsistent with this patient's prior return of bowel function and the presence of a transition point on imaging.
- B. There is no vignette evidence of a leak such as peritonitis, tachycardia, or wound findings, and this was a hysterectomy without bowel anastomosis.
- D. There are no signs of ischemia such as peritonitis, severe pain out of proportion, or lactic acidosis to warrant emergent surgery.
- E. Ileus management with prokinetics is incorrect because this presentation reflects mechanical obstruction, not ileus.
A 48-year-old man is postoperative day 7 after an open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. He reports increasing pain and redness around the incision. Temperature is 38.2°C (100.8°F), pulse is 96/min, and blood pressure is 128/82 mm Hg. Examination shows erythema and induration surrounding the lower abdominal incision with a fluctuant area and purulent drainage expressed from the wound edge. There is no evidence of fascial dehiscence or bowel evisceration.
- AContinue the current wound dressing and start oral cephalexin only
- BObtain a CT scan of the abdomen before any wound intervention
- CBegin broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics without opening the wound
- DOpen the wound and allow drainage with packing, leaving the skin edges apart
- EImmediately close the wound over a drain in the operating room
Show answer
A surgical site infection with purulent drainage and a fluctuant, indurated wound requires opening the incision to allow drainage of infected fluid, which is the most important step in source control. The wound should be opened at the skin and subcutaneous level, irrigated, and packed open to heal by secondary intention or delayed primary closure, while the fascia remains intact. Antibiotics are an adjunct, usually reserved for cases with surrounding cellulitis, systemic signs of infection, or immunocompromise, but opening and draining the wound is the essential first step. Imaging is not necessary when there's an obviously drainable superficial collection on examination.
- A. Continuing the dressing and relying on oral antibiotics alone fails to achieve source control of a purulent collection that needs drainage.
- B. CT imaging is unnecessary when there is an obvious superficial fluctuant collection accessible on bedside examination.
- C. Antibiotics alone without opening the wound will not adequately treat an abscess requiring drainage.
- E. Primary closure over a drain is inappropriate for an actively infected wound; it should be left open to drain.
A 67-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and a body mass index of 34 kg/m² is postoperative day 8 after an emergency exploratory laparotomy for a perforated gastric ulcer. He had a prolonged postoperative course complicated by a wound infection treated with local wound care. While coughing forcefully this morning, he noted a sudden gush of clear, salmon-colored fluid soaking through his abdominal dressing. He denies severe pain. Temperature is 37.1°C (98.8°F), pulse is 92/min, and blood pressure is 130/84 mm Hg. The wound edges appear separated with visible fascia but no bowel protrusion.
- AApply an abdominal binder and discharge with outpatient follow-up
- BPerform bedside manual reduction and primary skin closure
- CCover the wound with sterile saline-soaked gauze and arrange urgent surgical closure
- DReassure the patient and continue daily dressing changes
- EObserve for 24-48 hours to see if the fascia reapproximates spontaneously
Show answer
Salmon-colored or serosanguinous fluid draining from a surgical wound, often after a straining event like coughing, is a classic sign of fascial dehiscence, where the fascial closure has failed while the skin remains intact. Risk factors include obesity, diabetes mellitus, wound infection, advanced age, and increased intra-abdominal pressure, all present in this patient. The wound should be covered with sterile saline-soaked gauze to protect exposed viscera and prevent desiccation, and the patient should be taken urgently to the operating room for fascial repair to prevent evisceration or bowel injury. Fascial dehiscence does not heal spontaneously and requires surgical closure, usually with retention sutures given the high risk of recurrence.
- A. Outpatient discharge is inappropriate given the risk of evisceration; this requires inpatient urgent surgical management.
- B. Bedside reduction and skin closure alone do not address the fascial defect and risk incarceration or evisceration.
- D. Reassurance and routine dressing changes are inadequate for a fascial dehiscence, which requires surgical repair.
- E. Fascial dehiscence does not resolve spontaneously and delaying repair increases the risk of evisceration.
A 62-year-old woman with a history of stage II endometrial cancer is scheduled for an open total abdominal hysterectomy with lymph node dissection. She has no history of bleeding disorder and normal renal function. Her surgeon wants to minimize her risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism. She is classified as very high risk for VTE based on her malignancy and the planned major pelvic surgery.
- AMechanical prophylaxis with intermittent pneumatic compression alone, started postoperatively
- BOral warfarin started one week before surgery, with surgery delayed until INR is therapeutic
- CSubcutaneous unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin started preoperatively, continued postoperatively, combined with mechanical prophylaxis
- DNo pharmacologic prophylaxis given the bleeding risk of pelvic surgery, mechanical prophylaxis only
- ETherapeutic-dose intravenous heparin starting the night before surgery
Show answer
Patients undergoing major cancer surgery, such as this pelvic procedure for endometrial cancer, are classified as very high risk for VTE and benefit from combined mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis. Current guidelines recommend low-dose unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin started preoperatively (or immediately postoperatively if preoperative dosing is not feasible) and continued through the hospital stay, along with mechanical prophylaxis such as intermittent pneumatic compression. Extended prophylaxis for up to 4 weeks after discharge is also recommended in high-risk cancer surgery patients. Mechanical prophylaxis alone is insufficient in very high-risk patients, and therapeutic anticoagulation or warfarin is not used for routine surgical VTE prophylaxis due to bleeding risk and delayed onset of action.
- A. Mechanical prophylaxis alone is insufficient for a very high-risk patient undergoing major cancer surgery; combined prophylaxis is recommended.
- B. Warfarin is not used for surgical VTE prophylaxis due to its delayed onset and the impracticality of delaying cancer surgery for anticoagulation titration.
- D. Withholding pharmacologic prophylaxis is inappropriate for a very high-risk patient; low-dose prophylactic anticoagulation is recommended in addition to mechanical methods.
- E. Therapeutic-dose heparin is used for treatment of VTE, not prophylaxis, and markedly increases perioperative bleeding risk.
A 68-year-old man is scheduled for an elective open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. He has a history of well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. He reports no chest pain, and he is able to climb two flights of stairs without symptoms. He does not have a history of heart failure, cerebrovascular disease, or renal insufficiency, and does not require insulin. His Revised Cardiac Risk Index is calculated as 1 point for diabetes mellitus being treated with oral medication is not counted and this surgery is considered intermediate risk. His functional capacity is estimated at greater than 4 metabolic equivalents.
- AObtain a preoperative dobutamine stress echocardiogram
- BObtain a resting transthoracic echocardiogram before surgery
- CObtain a preoperative exercise treadmill stress test
- DProceed to surgery without additional cardiac testing
- EDelay surgery for coronary angiography
Show answer
According to the ACC/AHA perioperative guidelines, patients with good functional capacity, defined as being able to perform activities requiring more than 4 metabolic equivalents such as climbing two flights of stairs without symptoms, can proceed to surgery without further cardiac stress testing regardless of their RCRI score. Stress testing before noncardiac surgery is reserved for patients with poor or unknown functional capacity and elevated clinical risk (RCRI greater than or equal to 1 for intermediate-risk or vascular surgery) whose test results would change perioperative management. This patient's excellent functional capacity and lack of active cardiac symptoms mean that additional testing would not change management and would only delay a necessary cancer operation. Noninvasive stress testing should never be pursued purely routinely before elective noncardiac surgery when it will not change the surgical plan.
- A. Stress testing is unnecessary in a patient with good functional capacity (greater than 4 METs) regardless of RCRI, as it would not change management.
- B. A resting echocardiogram is not routinely indicated preoperatively in an asymptomatic patient with good functional capacity and no heart failure symptoms.
- C. An exercise stress test is unnecessary when functional capacity is already clinically established as good without symptoms.
- E. Coronary angiography is invasive and reserved for patients with unstable symptoms or strongly positive noninvasive testing, not indicated here.
Frequently asked questions
Are these real USMLE Step 2 CK questions?
No. They are original practice questions written in the style of USMLE Step 2 CK for its content outline. Real exam items are confidential. Every question here was solved blind by a second, independent model and removed if the key was disputed.
How should I use these general surgery & trauma questions?
Do the quiz first without looking at the answers, then read the explanation for every question you missed or guessed. The educational objective under each answer is the fact to remember.
Are the questions free?
Yes. All questions, answers and explanations on this page are free and need no account.
More USMLE Step 2 CK topics
Other exams
USMLE Step 2 CK is administered by NBME and FSMB. WhiteCoat Pro is not affiliated with or endorsed by them. All questions are original practice items written by the WhiteCoat Pro editorial team with AI assistance and checked by a second, independent AI model that solves every question blind; items with a disputed key are removed. They are not real exam questions. Educational use only, not medical advice.