Resuscitation & Airway
5 questionsA 45-year-old man with a deep neck space infection is undergoing rapid sequence intubation after an unsuccessful awake fiberoptic attempt. Following induction and paralysis, the anesthesiologist cannot visualize the airway with direct or video laryngoscopy, and bag-mask ventilation produces no chest rise despite an oropharyngeal airway and optimal positioning. Oxygen saturation falls to 78%. A supraglottic airway device is attempted and also fails to allow ventilation. What is the most appropriate next step?
- APerform emergency cricothyroidotomy
- BContinue bag-mask ventilation while awaiting a fiberoptic bronchoscope
- CAttempt a second direct laryngoscopy with a different blade
- DAdminister a second dose of a short-acting paralytic and reattempt bag-mask ventilation
Show answer
This scenario describes a cannot intubate, cannot ventilate emergency, confirmed by failed laryngoscopy, failed bag-mask ventilation, and failed supraglottic rescue, with worsening hypoxemia. Current difficult airway algorithms mandate immediate front-of-neck access via emergency cricothyroidotomy once all other airway attempts have failed and oxygenation cannot be achieved. Delaying for repeated attempts or additional equipment risks fatal hypoxic brain injury. Cricothyroidotomy provides a direct and rapid route to the airway below the level of obstruction.
- B. Continuing ineffective bag-mask ventilation while waiting for equipment allows ongoing hypoxia in an already desaturating patient.
- C. Repeating direct laryngoscopy wastes critical time in a confirmed cannot intubate, cannot ventilate scenario and will not resolve the obstruction.
- D. Additional paralytic will not overcome a mechanical obstruction and further delays definitive airway access.
A 30-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being stabbed in the left chest. He is in respiratory distress with a blood pressure of 78/50 mmHg, heart rate of 134 beats/min, and oxygen saturation of 82% on high-flow oxygen. Examination reveals distended neck veins, tracheal deviation to the right, and absent breath sounds over the left hemithorax with hyperresonance to percussion. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- ATension pneumothorax
- BMassive hemothorax
- CCardiac tamponade
- DFlail chest
Show answer
Tension pneumothorax is diagnosed clinically by the combination of respiratory distress, hypotension, distended neck veins, tracheal deviation away from the affected side, and ipsilateral absent breath sounds with hyperresonant percussion from trapped air under pressure. This is a clinical diagnosis that requires immediate decompression and must never await chest radiography. The mechanism is a one-way valve effect allowing air into the pleural space without escape, progressively compressing the lung, mediastinum, and great vessels. Massive hemothorax typically presents with dullness to percussion rather than hyperresonance, and tracheal deviation is less prominent.
- B. Massive hemothorax causes dullness to percussion from blood accumulation, not hyperresonance, and is less likely to cause marked tracheal deviation.
- C. Cardiac tamponade presents with distended neck veins and hypotension but with muffled heart sounds and normal, equal breath sounds bilaterally, not unilateral hyperresonance.
- D. Flail chest presents with paradoxical chest wall movement and crepitus over multiple rib fractures, not hyperresonance or tracheal deviation.
A 35-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department after a high-speed motor vehicle collision. She is conscious and speaking, with a respiratory rate of 28 breaths/min, oxygen saturation of 91% on room air, and decreased breath sounds on the right side. Blood pressure is 88/56 mmHg with a heart rate of 128 beats/min. A primary survey is being conducted. After confirming a patent airway with cervical spine protection, what is the most appropriate next step?
- AObtain intravenous access and begin fluid resuscitation
- BAssess breathing and perform needle decompression if a tension pneumothorax is confirmed
- CExpose the patient fully to examine for additional injuries
- DPerform a focused neurological examination using the Glasgow Coma Scale
Show answer
The ABCDE primary survey follows a strict sequence: Airway with cervical spine protection, Breathing, Circulation with hemorrhage control, Disability (neurological status), and Exposure. After airway is secured, breathing must be assessed next, since this patient has findings suggesting a tension pneumothorax, which requires immediate decompression before moving to circulation. Life-threatening breathing problems take priority over circulatory access because inadequate oxygenation and ventilation can rapidly cause cardiac arrest. Skipping ahead to circulation, neurological assessment, or exposure before addressing a breathing-threatening condition risks deterioration and death.
- A. Circulatory access is addressed after breathing is assessed and any immediately life-threatening chest pathology is managed.
- C. Full exposure is the final step of the primary survey, performed after airway, breathing, circulation, and disability have been assessed.
- D. Neurological assessment occurs after breathing and circulation have been addressed in the standard primary survey sequence.
A 26-year-old man sustains a pelvic fracture in a fall from height. He is alert but anxious, with a blood pressure of 100/78 mmHg, heart rate of 118 beats/min, respiratory rate of 24 breaths/min, and urine output of 22 mL/hour. His estimated blood volume is 5 liters. Based on these findings, which class of hemorrhagic shock is most consistent with his presentation?
- AClass II
- BClass I
- CClass III
- DClass IV
Show answer
Class III hemorrhagic shock corresponds to an estimated blood loss of 30-40% of circulating volume and is characterized by a measurable fall in systolic blood pressure, tachycardia above 120 beats/min, tachypnea, decreased urine output, and anxiety or confusion. This patient's heart rate of 118 beats/min, respiratory rate of 24 breaths/min, reduced urine output, and borderline hypotension fit this category rather than the milder classes. Class I involves minimal vital sign changes with blood loss up to 15%, and Class II involves tachycardia and narrowed pulse pressure with normal or mildly reduced blood pressure at 15-30% loss. Class IV involves severe hypotension, marked tachycardia above 140 beats/min, and negligible urine output at losses exceeding 40%.
- A. Class II shock typically shows a normal systolic blood pressure with narrowed pulse pressure, not the degree of tachycardia, tachypnea, and oliguria seen here.
- B. Class I shock involves minimal vital sign abnormalities with blood loss under 15% of volume, inconsistent with this tachycardic, oliguric patient.
- D. Class IV shock presents with profound hypotension, heart rate often exceeding 140 beats/min, and minimal or absent urine output, more severe than this presentation.
A 40-year-old man arrives in hemorrhagic shock after a high-speed collision with multiple long bone and pelvic fractures. His blood pressure is 70/40 mmHg despite two liters of crystalloid, and the trauma team activates the massive transfusion protocol. According to current guidelines, which ratio of packed red blood cells to fresh frozen plasma to platelets should be targeted?
- A3:1:1
- B1:1:1
- C2:1:1
- D4:2:1
Show answer
Current massive transfusion protocols, supported by the PROPPR trial and major trauma guidelines, recommend transfusing packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelets in a 1:1:1 ratio to approximate whole blood composition and reduce dilutional coagulopathy. This balanced approach reduces early mortality from hemorrhage compared with red-cell-predominant transfusion strategies. The goal is to replace lost clotting factors and platelets alongside oxygen-carrying capacity rather than diluting coagulation factors with red cells alone. Ratios skewed toward more red cells relative to plasma and platelets, such as 4:2:1, 2:1:1, or 3:1:1, increase the risk of coagulopathy and continued bleeding.
- A. A 3:1:1 ratio is excessively skewed toward red cells and does not match current balanced transfusion recommendations.
- C. A 2:1:1 ratio under-replaces plasma and platelets relative to red cells compared to the evidence-based balanced approach.
- D. A 4:2:1 ratio over-represents red cells relative to plasma and platelets, increasing dilutional coagulopathy risk.
Cardiovascular Emergencies
4 questionsA 58-year-old man with long-standing hypertension presents to the emergency department in Riyadh with sudden-onset tearing chest pain radiating to the back, which began 1 hour ago while gardening. Blood pressure is 168/96 mmHg in the right arm and 132/80 mmHg in the left arm. The right radial pulse is weaker than the left. A soft early diastolic murmur is heard at the left sternal border. ECG shows sinus tachycardia with no ST changes. Chest X-ray shows a widened mediastinum. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- ASpontaneous pneumothorax
- BAcute ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- CAcute aortic dissection
- DAcute pericarditis
Show answer
Tearing chest pain radiating to the back, a blood pressure differential between arms, an asymmetric pulse (pulse deficit), a new aortic regurgitation murmur, and a widened mediastinum on chest X-ray together strongly suggest acute aortic dissection, most commonly in a patient with chronic hypertension. The diastolic murmur reflects dissection extending proximally to disrupt the aortic valve. Confirmatory imaging is CT angiography of the aorta (or transesophageal echocardiography if the patient is unstable). Early recognition is critical because management differs completely from that of acute coronary syndrome.
- A. Pneumothorax causes unilateral absent breath sounds and tracheal deviation, not an inter-arm pressure difference or diastolic murmur.
- B. MI typically shows ST changes and does not explain the pulse or blood pressure differential and widened mediastinum.
- D. Pericarditis causes positional pleuritic pain with diffuse ST elevation and PR depression, not pulse or blood pressure asymmetry.
A 70-year-old woman with known ischemic cardiomyopathy presents with severe dyspnea that worsened over the past 6 hours. She is sitting upright, using accessory muscles. Blood pressure is 162/94 mmHg, heart rate 110/min, respiratory rate 32/min, and oxygen saturation 88% on room air. Bilateral coarse crackles are heard to the mid-zones, and there is pitting edema to the knees. The jugular venous pressure is elevated. What is the most appropriate initial pharmacologic management?
- AIntravenous dobutamine infusion
- BOral metoprolol and intravenous furosemide
- CIntravenous normal saline bolus and furosemide
- DIntravenous furosemide and intravenous nitroglycerin infusion
Show answer
This patient has acute decompensated heart failure with pulmonary edema and a preserved-to-elevated blood pressure, making her an ideal candidate for combined loop diuretic and vasodilator therapy. Intravenous nitroglycerin reduces preload and afterload rapidly, improving pulmonary congestion, while intravenous furosemide promotes diuresis and venodilation. Oxygen and, if needed, non-invasive ventilation are also started for hypoxia. Inotropes are reserved for patients with cardiogenic shock or low-output states, not for a hypertensive patient with adequate perfusion.
- A. Dobutamine is indicated in cardiogenic shock with hypotension, not in this hypertensive, adequately perfused patient.
- B. Beta-blockers are avoided in acute decompensation because they can worsen contractility; they are started after stabilization.
- C. Fluid bolus would worsen pulmonary edema in a volume-overloaded patient with elevated jugular venous pressure.
A 56-year-old man with end-stage renal disease missed his last two hemodialysis sessions. He presents with generalized weakness. Serum potassium is 7.4 mmol/L. ECG shows peaked T waves, a widened QRS complex, and loss of P waves. Blood pressure is 128/80 mmHg and he is alert. What is the most appropriate immediate step?
- AIntravenous insulin with dextrose
- BOral sodium polystyrene sulfonate
- CNebulized salbutamol
- DIntravenous calcium gluconate
Show answer
This patient has severe hyperkalemia with ECG evidence of cardiac membrane instability (widened QRS, loss of P waves), so the first priority is to stabilize the myocardium with intravenous calcium gluconate, which antagonizes the effect of potassium on cardiac cell membranes within minutes. This buys time while measures that shift potassium intracellularly, such as insulin-dextrose and nebulized beta-agonists, and measures that remove potassium, such as dialysis, are arranged. Calcium does not lower serum potassium; it only protects the heart temporarily.
- A. Insulin-dextrose shifts potassium intracellularly but acts over 15-30 minutes and does not provide the immediate membrane stabilization needed with these ECG changes.
- B. Oral potassium binders act over hours and do not address the acute risk of arrhythmia from membrane instability.
- C. Nebulized salbutamol also shifts potassium intracellularly but has a slower onset and is adjunctive, not first-line, when ECG changes are present.
A 45-year-old woman who underwent total knee replacement 10 days ago develops sudden dyspnea and collapse. Blood pressure is 78/50 mmHg, heart rate 128/min, and oxygen saturation 84% on room air. She is cold and diaphoretic. Bedside echocardiography shows a dilated, hypokinetic right ventricle. CT pulmonary angiography is not immediately available, and the clinical picture is consistent with massive pulmonary embolism. There are no absolute contraindications to thrombolysis. What is the most appropriate next step?
- ATherapeutic unfractionated heparin infusion alone
- BTransfer for catheter-directed thrombectomy without anticoagulation
- CUrgent inferior vena cava filter placement
- DSystemic thrombolytic therapy
Show answer
This patient has massive (high-risk) pulmonary embolism with hemodynamic instability (shock, hypotension) and right ventricular strain on echocardiography, which is sufficient to justify systemic thrombolysis even without confirmatory CT angiography when the clinical suspicion is high and imaging is not feasible due to instability. Thrombolytics rapidly lyse the clot, reducing right ventricular afterload and improving survival in this high-risk group. Anticoagulation alone does not dissolve the existing clot quickly enough to reverse shock. Catheter-based therapy is an alternative when thrombolysis is contraindicated or unavailable, but systemic thrombolysis remains first-line when feasible.
- A. Heparin alone prevents clot propagation but does not rapidly resolve the obstructing thrombus causing shock.
- B. Omitting anticoagulation is inappropriate, and catheter thrombectomy is reserved for cases where thrombolysis is contraindicated or has failed.
- C. An IVC filter prevents further emboli but does not treat the existing massive embolism causing current hemodynamic collapse.
Respiratory Emergencies
4 questionsA 24-year-old woman with known asthma presents with worsening breathlessness since the morning. She can speak only in short phrases and prefers to sit forward. Respiratory rate is 32/min, heart rate is 118/min, and oxygen saturation is 91% on room air. On auscultation, there is a loud wheeze throughout both lung fields. Peak expiratory flow rate is 45% of her predicted best. What is the severity of this asthma exacerbation?
- AModerate exacerbation
- BAcute severe exacerbation
- CMild exacerbation
- DLife-threatening exacerbation
Show answer
This patient has acute severe asthma, defined by peak expiratory flow of 33-50% of predicted or best, inability to complete full sentences, respiratory rate ≥25/min, and heart rate ≥110/min. Life-threatening asthma requires features such as peak flow below 33%, oxygen saturation below 92% with a silent chest, cyanosis, exhaustion, arrhythmia, or altered consciousness, none of which are present here. Recognizing severity grading guides decisions on monitoring intensity, need for arterial blood gas, and escalation of therapy. This patient's saturation of 91% alone does not meet the life-threatening threshold without the accompanying severe features.
- A. Moderate exacerbations allow normal speech with peak flow typically 50-75% of predicted and less tachycardia.
- C. Mild exacerbations have normal speech, respiratory rate, and peak flow above 70-80% of predicted.
- D. Life-threatening asthma requires a silent chest, cyanosis, exhaustion, bradycardia/arrhythmia, or peak flow below 33%, which are absent here.
A 68-year-old man with known severe COPD (baseline home oxygen use) presents with increased dyspnea and productive cough. He is given high-flow oxygen at 15 L/min via a non-rebreather mask in the ambulance. On arrival, he is drowsy and difficult to arouse. Oxygen saturation is 99%. Arterial blood gas shows pH 7.21, PaCO2 9.8 kPa (73.5 mmHg), and PaO2 14 kPa (105 mmHg). What is the most likely mechanism responsible for his deterioration?
- AAbsorption atelectasis causing worsening hypoxemia
- BOxygen-induced coronary vasospasm causing myocardial ischemia
- CLoss of hypoxic respiratory drive with worsening ventilation-perfusion mismatch
- DAcute pulmonary embolism causing right heart strain
Show answer
In patients with chronic CO2 retention, excessive supplemental oxygen can blunt the hypoxic drive that partly maintains ventilation and can worsen ventilation-perfusion mismatching (through reversal of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction) and the Haldane effect, leading to progressive hypercapnia, respiratory acidosis, and depressed consciousness, exactly as seen in this patient's blood gas. The correct approach in COPD exacerbations is titrated, controlled oxygen therapy to a target saturation of 88-92% using a Venturi mask, avoiding hyperoxia. This case illustrates why oxygen must be carefully titrated rather than given liberally in chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure.
- A. Absorption atelectasis can cause hypoxemia but does not account for this degree of hypercapnia and respiratory acidosis.
- B. Oxygen is not a recognized cause of coronary vasospasm in this clinical context and would not explain the hypercapnic acidosis.
- D. Pulmonary embolism would not directly explain the marked hypercapnia and acidosis pattern seen with excessive oxygen administration.
A 30-year-old woman develops sudden facial swelling, widespread urticaria, and wheeze within 10 minutes of eating shrimp at a restaurant in Jeddah. She reports nausea and a sensation of throat tightness. Blood pressure is 86/54 mmHg, heart rate is 122/min, and oxygen saturation is 93% on room air. There is audible stridor. What is the most appropriate immediate action?
- ANebulized salbutamol
- BIntramuscular epinephrine
- COral chlorpheniramine
- DIntravenous hydrocortisone
Show answer
This patient meets criteria for anaphylaxis: acute onset involving skin/mucosa (urticaria, facial swelling) plus respiratory compromise (stridor, wheeze, hypoxia) and hypotension after a likely allergen exposure. Intramuscular epinephrine into the anterolateral thigh is the immediate, first-line treatment because it reverses vasodilation, reduces mucosal edema, and has bronchodilator and inotropic effects, and should not be delayed for other therapies. Corticosteroids, antihistamines, and inhaled bronchodilators are useful adjuncts but do not substitute for epinephrine as the initial life-saving step.
- A. Nebulized salbutamol may help wheeze but does not address the laryngeal edema, hypotension, or systemic process of anaphylaxis.
- C. Antihistamines relieve cutaneous symptoms but have no significant effect on airway obstruction or shock in anaphylaxis.
- D. Corticosteroids have delayed onset and are adjunctive; they do not acutely reverse the airway or hemodynamic compromise.
A 24-year-old man develops lip swelling, diffuse urticaria, and wheeze with stridor 10 minutes after eating shrimp at a restaurant in Jeddah. In the emergency department his blood pressure is 82/50 mmHg, heart rate is 128/min, respiratory rate is 28/min, and oxygen saturation is 91% on room air. Which of the following is the most appropriate immediate drug and route?
- AHydrocortisone 200 mg intravenously
- BEpinephrine 0.5 mg intramuscularly
- CDiphenhydramine 50 mg intramuscularly
- DEpinephrine 0.5 mg intravenously
Show answer
Anaphylaxis with airway compromise and hypotension requires immediate intramuscular epinephrine, the only drug that reverses the underlying mast-cell-mediated vasodilation, bronchoconstriction, and capillary leak. The recommended adult dose is 0.3-0.5 mg of 1:1000 (1 mg/mL) solution injected into the anterolateral thigh, repeated every 5-15 minutes as needed. Intravenous epinephrine is reserved for refractory anaphylaxis with cardiac arrest or profound shock unresponsive to IM dosing and carries a high risk of arrhythmia if given as a bolus at this concentration. Antihistamines and corticosteroids are adjunctive treatments that have no proven effect on the acute airway or hemodynamic collapse of anaphylaxis.
- A. Corticosteroids are adjunctive and have delayed onset; they do not treat the acute airway or hemodynamic crisis.
- C. Antihistamines relieve urticaria and itching but do not reverse bronchospasm or hypotension and are not first-line.
- D. IV epinephrine at this dose and concentration risks fatal arrhythmia and is reserved for refractory shock or cardiac arrest under cardiac monitoring.
Neurological Emergencies
5 questionsA 68-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department with acute left-sided weakness and slurred speech that her husband noticed when she failed to respond normally while they were having breakfast together 2 hours ago; she was last known to be normal 2.5 hours before arrival. Blood pressure is 160/92 mmHg, blood glucose is 6.2 mmol/L, and a non-contrast CT of the head shows no hemorrhage. There is no history of recent surgery, trauma, or anticoagulant use. What is the most appropriate next step?
- AStart aspirin 300 mg orally and admit for observation
- BWait for repeat CT in 6 hours to confirm infarct before treatment
- CAdminister intravenous alteplase as soon as other eligibility criteria are confirmed
- DProceed directly to mechanical thrombectomy without alteplase
Show answer
This patient presents within 4.5 hours of clear symptom onset with a CT scan showing no hemorrhage, meeting the standard time window for intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. Alteplase works by converting plasminogen to plasmin, promoting clot lysis and restoring cerebral perfusion, and benefit is time-dependent, with earlier treatment giving better functional outcomes. Waiting for a repeat scan would needlessly delay treatment within the therapeutic window. Aspirin alone is used when thrombolysis is contraindicated or the window has passed, and thrombectomy does not replace alteplase in eligible patients without a large-vessel occlusion.
- A. Aspirin alone is inferior to thrombolysis in an eligible patient within the time window and should not substitute for alteplase.
- B. Delaying treatment to repeat imaging wastes valuable time within the 4.5-hour therapeutic window and worsens outcomes.
- D. Thrombectomy is an adjunct for large-vessel occlusion, usually combined with, not substituted for, alteplase in eligible patients.
A 71-year-old man arrives at the emergency department 90 minutes after sudden onset of right-sided weakness and expressive aphasia. His blood pressure is 148/88 mmHg, blood glucose is 5.8 mmol/L, and non-contrast CT of the head shows no hemorrhage. His medical history includes atrial fibrillation treated with warfarin, and his international normalized ratio (INR) drawn on arrival is 2.6. What is the most appropriate next step regarding thrombolytic therapy?
- AAdminister intravenous alteplase at a reduced dose
- BAdminister intravenous alteplase together with fresh frozen plasma
- CAdminister intravenous alteplase after giving vitamin K
- DWithhold intravenous alteplase because of the elevated INR
Show answer
An INR above 1.7 in a patient on vitamin K antagonist therapy is an absolute contraindication to intravenous alteplase because it substantially increases the risk of fatal intracranial or systemic hemorrhage. Alteplase works by activating plasmin to degrade fibrin clots, and this fibrinolytic effect compounds the bleeding risk already present from anticoagulation. In such patients, mechanical thrombectomy should be considered if a large-vessel occlusion is confirmed and the patient is within the eligible time window, since thrombectomy does not carry the same bleeding risk. There is no dose reduction or reversal strategy that makes alteplase safe to give once the INR exceeds the threshold.
- A. There is no validated reduced-dose alteplase protocol for anticoagulated patients with elevated INR; the contraindication is absolute.
- B. Giving alteplase with FFP does not mitigate the bleeding risk and is not a recommended approach; the INR elevation remains a contraindication.
- C. Reversing with vitamin K to then give alteplase delays treatment and is not a recognized strategy; the contraindication remains until coagulation truly normalizes.
A 59-year-old man is brought to the emergency department with sudden severe headache followed by left-sided weakness that began 45 minutes ago. His blood pressure is 190/110 mmHg and Glasgow Coma Scale score is 13. The treating team must urgently determine whether this is a hemorrhagic or ischemic event before deciding on thrombolysis. Which investigation is most appropriate to obtain first?
- ANon-contrast computed tomography of the head
- BLumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid analysis
- CCarotid duplex ultrasonography
- DMagnetic resonance imaging of the brain with diffusion-weighted sequences
Show answer
Non-contrast CT of the head is the first-line investigation in suspected acute stroke because it is rapid, widely available, and highly sensitive for detecting acute intracranial hemorrhage, which must be excluded before any consideration of thrombolytic therapy. Ischemic changes may not be visible on CT in the first few hours, but the priority at this stage is ruling out hemorrhage rather than characterizing the infarct. MRI is more sensitive for early ischemic changes but takes longer, costs more, and is less immediately available, making it impractical for the first-line emergency decision. Lumbar puncture and carotid ultrasonography have no role in the immediate hemorrhage-versus-infarct determination.
- B. Lumbar puncture is used for suspected subarachnoid hemorrhage with a normal CT or for meningitis, not as the first-line stroke imaging test.
- C. Carotid duplex evaluates extracranial vessel stenosis for secondary prevention and does not detect intracranial hemorrhage.
- D. MRI is more time-consuming and less immediately available than CT, delaying the urgent decision on hemorrhage exclusion.
A 42-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with a severe headache that reached maximum intensity within one minute, three hours ago. She describes it as the worst headache of her life, with associated neck stiffness but no focal weakness. Vital signs are temperature 37.1°C, blood pressure 142/88 mmHg, heart rate 92 beats/min. Neurological examination is normal. A non-contrast CT scan of the brain performed 3 hours after symptom onset is reported as normal. What is the most appropriate next step?
- AStart empiric nimodipine and admit for observation without further testing
- BDischarge with oral analgesia and outpatient neurology follow-up
- CRepeat the non-contrast CT scan in 24 hours
- DPerform a lumbar puncture to look for xanthochromia and red blood cells
Show answer
A normal non-contrast CT within 6 hours of symptom onset has very high sensitivity for subarachnoid hemorrhage but does not reach 100%, so current guidelines recommend lumbar puncture when clinical suspicion remains and CT is negative. Lumbar puncture performed after 6-12 hours allows detection of xanthochromia from red cell breakdown, distinguishing true subarachnoid blood from a traumatic tap. CT angiography may follow if the LP is positive to identify an aneurysm. Discharging a patient with a classic thunderclap headache without excluding SAH risks missing a life-threatening bleed.
- A. Nimodipine is used for vasospasm prophylaxis after confirmed aneurysmal SAH, not as a substitute for diagnosis.
- B. Thunderclap headache with meningismus requires exclusion of subarachnoid hemorrhage before discharge.
- C. Repeating CT in 24 hours delays diagnosis; lumbar puncture is the appropriate next test now.
A 28-year-old man is brought to the emergency department with fever, severe headache, and neck stiffness for the past 6 hours. His Glasgow Coma Scale score is 14/15 and he has papilledema on fundoscopic examination. Blood pressure is 118/76 mmHg, heart rate 108 beats/min, temperature 39.4°C. Bacterial meningitis is suspected, but lumbar puncture is deferred pending a CT scan of the brain because of the papilledema. What is the most appropriate immediate step?
- AGive a single dose of oral antibiotics while awaiting CT
- BDraw blood cultures and start empiric intravenous antibiotics immediately
- CWait for the CT scan results before giving any antibiotics
- DStart empiric antibiotics only after the lumbar puncture is eventually performed
Show answer
When lumbar puncture must be delayed, for example due to signs raising concern for raised intracranial pressure, blood cultures should be drawn and empiric intravenous antibiotics (plus dexamethasone where indicated) started immediately without waiting for imaging or CSF results. Delaying antibiotics in suspected bacterial meningitis increases morbidity and mortality, as outcome correlates strongly with time to effective therapy. CT scanning before LP does not need to precede treatment; it only determines the safety of proceeding with LP. Blood cultures still allow organism identification even if CSF sampling is delayed.
- A. Oral antibiotics do not achieve adequate CSF concentrations and are inappropriate for bacterial meningitis.
- C. Waiting for CT delays life-saving antibiotic therapy and worsens outcomes.
- D. Antibiotics must not be withheld until LP is performed; they should be started before or independent of LP timing.
Toxicology & Environmental
4 questionsA 19-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department 6 hours after reportedly ingesting an unknown number of paracetamol tablets in a suicide attempt. She is asymptomatic. A serum paracetamol level drawn at 6 hours post-ingestion is 220 micrograms/mL (1456 micromol/L). Liver function tests, renal function, and coagulation studies are normal. Using the Rumack-Matthew nomogram, what is the most appropriate interpretation and next step?
- AThe nomogram cannot be applied because the patient is asymptomatic
- BThe level is above the treatment line, so N-acetylcysteine should be started
- CThe level must be repeated at 12 hours before any decision can be made
- DThe level is below the treatment line, so no treatment is required
Show answer
The Rumack-Matthew nomogram plots serum paracetamol concentration against time since a single acute ingestion, with a treatment line starting at 150 micrograms/mL (993 micromol/L) at 4 hours and declining logarithmically. A level of 220 micrograms/mL at 6 hours lies above the treatment line, indicating significant risk of hepatotoxicity and the need for immediate N-acetylcysteine therapy. The nomogram is only valid for levels drawn between 4 and 24 hours after a single acute ingestion, which applies here. Clinical symptoms are typically absent early despite a toxic level, so absence of symptoms does not exclude the need for treatment.
- A. The nomogram is specifically designed for use in asymptomatic patients early after ingestion.
- C. Treatment decisions should not be delayed for a repeat level when the current level already indicates a toxic range.
- D. A level of 220 micrograms/mL at 6 hours is above, not below, the treatment line on the nomogram.
A 24-year-old man is diagnosed with acute paracetamol toxicity requiring N-acetylcysteine therapy. His treating physician explains that earlier administration of N-acetylcysteine produces significantly better outcomes in preventing liver injury. What is the primary mechanism by which N-acetylcysteine prevents hepatotoxicity in this setting?
- AIt inhibits cytochrome P450 enzymes, blocking formation of N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine
- BIt replenishes hepatic glutathione stores, which detoxify the toxic metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine
- CIt induces hepatic enzyme systems that accelerate paracetamol excretion in bile
- DIt directly chelates paracetamol in the bloodstream, preventing hepatic uptake
Show answer
Paracetamol is normally metabolized mainly by glucuronidation and sulfation, with a small fraction converted by cytochrome P450 (mainly CYP2E1) to the toxic metabolite N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI), which is usually detoxified by conjugation with glutathione. In overdose, glutathione stores become depleted, allowing NAPQI to accumulate and cause centrilobular hepatocyte necrosis. N-acetylcysteine acts as a glutathione precursor, replenishing glutathione stores and also providing an alternative substrate for direct NAPQI conjugation, which is why earlier administration (ideally within 8 hours) prevents more hepatocyte damage. It does not chelate paracetamol or primarily inhibit the P450 enzymes responsible for NAPQI formation.
- A. N-acetylcysteine does not significantly inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes; its protective effect is through glutathione replenishment.
- C. N-acetylcysteine does not act by inducing biliary excretion pathways for paracetamol.
- D. N-acetylcysteine does not act as a chelator of paracetamol in the circulation.
A 45-year-old farmer is brought to the emergency department after being found confused near pesticide containers. On examination, he has excessive salivation, profuse sweating, miosis, bilateral wheezing on chest auscultation, and involuntary urination. Heart rate is 48 beats/min, blood pressure is 96/60 mmHg, respiratory rate is 28 breaths/min. What is the most appropriate initial pharmacologic treatment?
- AIntravenous atropine
- BIntravenous flumazenil
- CIntravenous naloxone
- DIntravenous physostigmine
Show answer
This presentation of miosis, salivation, sweating, bronchorrhea/wheezing, bradycardia, and incontinence reflects a cholinergic toxidrome from organophosphate poisoning, caused by irreversible inhibition of acetylcholinesterase leading to excess acetylcholine at muscarinic receptors. Atropine is the first-line antidote, competitively blocking muscarinic receptors to reverse bronchorrhea, bradycardia, and secretions, and is titrated to drying of secretions rather than a fixed dose. Pralidoxime is added to reactivate acetylcholinesterase, but atropine is given first to counter the immediately life-threatening muscarinic effects. Naloxone and flumazenil reverse opioid and benzodiazepine toxicity respectively, and physostigmine would worsen a cholinergic crisis by further inhibiting acetylcholinesterase.
- B. Flumazenil reverses benzodiazepine toxicity and has no role in cholinergic poisoning.
- C. Naloxone reverses opioid toxicity, which presents with pinpoint pupils and respiratory depression but not bronchorrhea or sweating.
- D. Physostigmine inhibits acetylcholinesterase and would worsen this cholinergic toxidrome.
A 31-year-old man is brought to the emergency department unresponsive after suspected heroin use. Respiratory rate is 6 breaths/min, oxygen saturation is 84% on room air, and pupils are pinpoint bilaterally. Naloxone is administered intravenously with rapid improvement in respiratory rate and consciousness. Thirty minutes later, the patient becomes drowsy again with respiratory rate falling to 8 breaths/min. What is the most likely explanation for this recurrence?
- AThe initial dose of naloxone was metabolized into an active opioid agonist
- BThe patient has developed acute tolerance to naloxone after the first dose
- CNaloxone has no effect on respiratory depression and only reverses pupillary findings
- DThe duration of action of naloxone is shorter than that of the opioid, requiring repeat dosing or an infusion
Show answer
Naloxone is a competitive opioid receptor antagonist with a short half-life of approximately 30-90 minutes, which is frequently shorter than that of the ingested opioid (such as heroin's active metabolite morphine, or longer-acting opioids like methadone). As naloxone's effect wears off before the opioid is cleared, the patient can relapse into respiratory depression, which is why repeat dosing or a continuous naloxone infusion and prolonged observation are required. Tolerance to naloxone itself does not develop within this short timeframe. Naloxone reverses both the respiratory depression and pupillary constriction caused by opioid agonism at the mu receptor.
- A. Naloxone is not metabolized into an active opioid agonist.
- B. Acute tolerance to naloxone does not develop within thirty minutes.
- C. Naloxone effectively reverses opioid-induced respiratory depression, which is its primary clinical use.
Metabolic & Endocrine Emergencies
3 questionsA 24-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes mellitus presents to the emergency department with vomiting and abdominal pain for one day. Her blood glucose is 420 mg/dL, arterial pH is 7.18, serum bicarbonate is 9 mmol/L, and serum ketones are strongly positive. Her blood pressure is 96/60 mmHg, heart rate is 118/min, and she appears dehydrated with dry mucous membranes. Serum potassium is 4.8 mmol/L. What is the most appropriate initial step in management?
- AStart intravenous regular insulin infusion
- BAdminister intravenous sodium bicarbonate
- CStart intravenous isotonic saline bolus
- DStart intravenous potassium chloride infusion
Show answer
The patient meets diagnostic criteria for diabetic ketoacidosis with hyperglycemia, metabolic acidosis with low bicarbonate, and positive ketones, and she shows signs of significant dehydration with tachycardia and hypotension. Initial management prioritizes rapid intravenous isotonic saline to restore intravascular volume and tissue perfusion before starting insulin, since insulin given to a volume-depleted patient can worsen hypotension and cause a precipitous fall in potassium. Insulin infusion is started after initial fluid resuscitation, once potassium is confirmed to be above 3.3 mmol/L. Bicarbonate therapy is reserved for severe acidosis with pH below 6.9 and is not routinely given. Potassium replacement is guided by insulin therapy and serum levels, not started before fluids.
- A. Insulin should not be started before adequate fluid resuscitation because it can precipitate hypotension and rapid potassium shifts.
- B. Bicarbonate is reserved for severe acidosis with pH below about 6.9 and is not indicated at this pH.
- D. Potassium is currently normal, and fluid resuscitation takes priority before any electrolyte infusion is started.
A 55-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mellitus on subcutaneous insulin is brought to the emergency department after being found confused and sweating at home. He is unable to swallow safely. Capillary blood glucose is 38 mg/dL. He has a patent airway and is breathing normally, with an intravenous line already in place. What is the most appropriate immediate step?
- AAdminister intramuscular glucagon
- BAdminister intravenous normal saline
- CAdminister intravenous 50% dextrose
- DAdminister oral glucose gel
Show answer
This patient has severe symptomatic hypoglycemia with altered mental status and cannot safely take anything orally, so intravenous dextrose is the fastest and most reliable route to correct glucose and reverse neurological symptoms given that intravenous access is already available. Glucagon is useful when intravenous access is not available, but it acts more slowly and relies on hepatic glycogen stores, which may be depleted in some patients. Oral glucose is contraindicated in a confused patient who cannot protect his airway because of aspiration risk. Normal saline does not correct hypoglycemia and would delay appropriate treatment.
- A. Glucagon is reserved for situations without intravenous access and acts more slowly than intravenous dextrose.
- B. Normal saline does not contain glucose and will not correct the hypoglycemia.
- D. Oral glucose risks aspiration in a confused patient who cannot swallow safely.
A 42-year-old woman with a history of autoimmune adrenal insufficiency presents to the emergency department with severe vomiting, diarrhea, and weakness for two days after missing her oral medications. Her blood pressure is 76/48 mmHg despite two liters of intravenous normal saline, heart rate is 124/min, and capillary glucose is 58 mg/dL. Serum sodium is 128 mmol/L and potassium is 6.0 mmol/L. What is the most appropriate immediate step?
- AAdminister intravenous hydrocortisone
- BAdminister intravenous insulin and glucose for hyperkalemia
- CAdminister intravenous fludrocortisone
- DAdminister intravenous dopamine for blood pressure support
Show answer
This patient has adrenal crisis, shown by hypotension refractory to fluids, hyponatremia, hyperkalemia, and hypoglycemia in a patient who missed her glucocorticoid replacement. Immediate intravenous hydrocortisone is the definitive treatment because it replaces the deficient glucocorticoid, which is required to restore vascular tone and reverse the electrolyte and hemodynamic abnormalities, and should not be delayed for confirmatory testing. Fludrocortisone is an oral mineralocorticoid used for chronic maintenance therapy and is not used in acute parenteral treatment of adrenal crisis because hydrocortisone at stress doses already provides sufficient mineralocorticoid activity. Treating hyperkalemia directly with insulin and glucose is unnecessary here, since correcting the underlying cortisol deficiency with fluids will resolve the electrolyte disturbance. Vasopressors are not first-line because the hypotension is due to glucocorticoid deficiency and is best corrected by steroid replacement combined with fluids, not vasopressor therapy.
- B. The hyperkalemia here is due to cortisol deficiency and will improve with hydrocortisone and fluids, so direct treatment with insulin and glucose is not the priority.
- C. Fludrocortisone is used for chronic oral maintenance, not acute parenteral treatment of adrenal crisis, and stress-dose hydrocortisone provides adequate mineralocorticoid effect acutely.
- D. Vasopressors are not first-line because the hypotension results from glucocorticoid deficiency and responds to steroid replacement and fluid resuscitation.
Abdominal & GI Emergencies
4 questionsA 27-year-old woman presents to the emergency department with sudden onset of severe lower abdominal pain for 1 hour. She has had 6 weeks of amenorrhea and a positive urine pregnancy test. Blood pressure is 82/50 mmHg, heart rate is 128 beats/min, and respiratory rate is 26 breaths/min. She is pale and diaphoretic. Abdominal examination shows diffuse tenderness and guarding with shifting dullness. Bedside ultrasound shows a large amount of free fluid in the pelvis and no intrauterine gestational sac.
- APerform diagnostic laparoscopy after the patient becomes hemodynamically stable
- BObtain formal transvaginal ultrasound by radiology before proceeding further
- CInsert two large-bore intravenous lines, start fluid resuscitation, and arrange immediate surgery
- DAdminister intramuscular methotrexate and monitor serial beta-hCG levels
Show answer
This patient has hemorrhagic shock from a presumed ruptured ectopic pregnancy, confirmed by hypotension, tachycardia, a positive pregnancy test, and free intraperitoneal fluid on bedside ultrasound. The priority in an unstable patient is simultaneous resuscitation and immediate surgical intervention (laparotomy or laparoscopy depending on surgeon expertise and stability), not further imaging or delay. Waiting for stabilization or additional tests risks ongoing exsanguination and death. Definitive hemostatic control through surgery is the only intervention that stops the bleeding source.
- A. Waiting for stabilization is inappropriate because ongoing hemorrhage will worsen shock; surgery itself is needed to stop the bleeding.
- B. Formal imaging causes dangerous delay in an unstable patient who needs immediate surgical control of bleeding.
- D. Methotrexate is for stable, unruptured ectopic pregnancy, not a ruptured one with hemorrhagic shock.
A 58-year-old man with a history of liver cirrhosis presents with two episodes of hematemesis and black tarry stools over the past 6 hours. Blood pressure is 88/56 mmHg, heart rate is 118 beats/min. He appears pale with cool extremities. Hemoglobin is 7.2 g/dL. He is given supplemental oxygen and intravenous access is secured with two large-bore cannulas.
- AWithhold transfusion until endoscopy confirms the bleeding source
- BGive crystalloid fluid boluses cautiously and transfuse packed red blood cells targeting hemoglobin around 7-9 g/dL
- CAdminister high-dose intravenous proton pump inhibitor alone without any blood transfusion
- DGive crystalloid fluid boluses and transfuse packed red blood cells targeting hemoglobin above 10 g/dL
Show answer
In acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, a restrictive transfusion strategy targeting a hemoglobin of 7-9 g/dL is recommended, as it has been shown to reduce rebleeding and mortality compared with a liberal strategy, particularly in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension where overtransfusion can raise portal pressure and precipitate further variceal bleeding. Fluid resuscitation should be judicious to avoid dilutional coagulopathy and increased portal pressure. This patient already meets transfusion criteria given hemoglobin of 7.2 g/dL with ongoing hemodynamic compromise. Early risk stratification and endoscopy within 24 hours remain essential alongside resuscitation, not as a prerequisite for transfusion in an actively bleeding, symptomatic patient.
- A. Transfusion should not be delayed until endoscopy in a hemodynamically unstable, symptomatic anemic patient.
- C. Proton pump inhibitors do not correct hemorrhagic shock or severe anemia; transfusion is still required based on hemoglobin and hemodynamics.
- D. A liberal transfusion target above 10 g/dL increases portal pressure and rebleeding risk in cirrhotic patients and is not recommended.
A 14-year-old boy presents to the emergency department with sudden severe left testicular pain and nausea that began 3 hours ago while playing football. On examination, the left testis is high-riding, horizontally oriented, and exquisitely tender, with absent cremasteric reflex on that side. There is no fever and urinalysis is normal.
- AApply manual detorsion in the emergency department and discharge with urology follow-up
- BStart empiric antibiotics for suspected epididymo-orchitis and reassess in 24 hours
- COrder color Doppler ultrasound of the scrotum before deciding on management
- DProceed immediately to surgical exploration without waiting for imaging
Show answer
This presentation, sudden severe pain, high-riding horizontal testis, and absent cremasteric reflex, is classic for testicular torsion, a time-critical surgical emergency where testicular viability depends on time to detorsion. When clinical suspicion is high, immediate surgical exploration should not be delayed for imaging, since testicular salvage rates fall sharply after 6 hours of ischemia. Doppler ultrasound is useful only when the diagnosis is uncertain and would not change management here. Urology should be contacted emergently for scrotal exploration and detorsion, with orchiopexy of both testes if torsion is confirmed.
- A. Manual detorsion is a temporizing measure at best and does not replace urgent surgical exploration; discharge is inappropriate.
- B. Antibiotics are for epididymo-orchitis, which typically has gradual onset, fever, and pyuria, not this acute ischemic presentation.
- C. Classic clinical findings make imaging unnecessary and would only delay definitive treatment, risking testicular loss.
A 76-year-old woman with chronic atrial fibrillation not on anticoagulation presents with severe diffuse abdominal pain for 4 hours that is out of proportion to a relatively benign abdominal examination. She has vomited twice. Heart rate is 110 beats/min and irregular, blood pressure is 128/80 mmHg. Abdomen is soft with mild diffuse tenderness and no peritoneal signs. Serum lactate is 4.8 mmol/L (reference range 0.5-2.2 mmol/L).
- AAbdominal ultrasound with Doppler of the superior mesenteric artery
- BContrast-enhanced computed tomography angiography of the abdomen
- CPlain abdominal radiograph to look for free air and bowel dilation
- DUrgent diagnostic laparotomy without further imaging
Show answer
The combination of severe abdominal pain out of proportion to examination findings, atrial fibrillation without anticoagulation as an embolic source, and elevated lactate strongly suggests acute mesenteric ischemia, most commonly from embolic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery. CT angiography is the investigation of choice because it rapidly identifies the site and extent of vascular occlusion and bowel viability, guiding urgent surgical or endovascular intervention. Plain radiography is insensitive for early mesenteric ischemia and only shows late signs such as pneumatosis or free air. Laparotomy without imaging is reserved for patients with peritonitis or hemodynamic collapse, which this patient does not yet have.
- A. Doppler ultrasound is operator-dependent and limited by bowel gas, making it unreliable for diagnosing acute mesenteric ischemia.
- C. Plain radiography is insensitive in early mesenteric ischemia and only detects late complications such as perforation or pneumatosis.
- D. Laparotomy without imaging is reserved for patients with peritonitis or shock, not for a stable patient without peritoneal signs.
Pediatric & Obstetric Emergencies
4 questionsA 4-year-old boy weighing 18 kg is brought to the emergency department with vomiting and diarrhea for 2 days. He is lethargic with dry mucous membranes, sunken eyes, and a capillary refill time of 3 seconds. Heart rate is 140 beats/min, blood pressure is 88/54 mmHg. He is diagnosed with moderate to severe dehydration and intravenous access is obtained.
- A360 mL of 0.9% saline over 1 hour
- B180 mL of 0.9% saline over 1 hour
- C900 mL of 0.9% saline over 1 hour
- D540 mL of 0.9% saline over 1 hour
Show answer
The standard initial fluid bolus for a dehydrated child with signs of hypoperfusion is 20 mL/kg of isotonic crystalloid such as 0.9% saline, given as a rapid bolus and reassessed afterward. For this 18 kg child, 20 mL/kg multiplied by 18 kg equals 360 mL. This dose is used both in pediatric sepsis and moderate to severe dehydration to restore intravascular volume while the response is reassessed to decide if further boluses are needed. Over-resuscitation or under-dosing beyond this standard weight-based calculation increases risk of fluid overload or inadequate perfusion correction.
- B. This corresponds to only 10 mL/kg, which under-resuscitates a child with signs of moderate to severe dehydration.
- C. This corresponds to 50 mL/kg, which is excessive for an initial bolus and risks pulmonary edema.
- D. This corresponds to 30 mL/kg, which exceeds the standard initial bolus volume and risks fluid overload.
An 18-month-old girl is brought to the emergency department after a generalized tonic-clonic seizure lasting 4 minutes at home during a febrile illness, with temperature of 39.2°C. She returned to her normal alert and playful self within 15 minutes after the seizure stopped. There is no prior history of seizures, no neurological deficits, and examination including neck stiffness assessment is unremarkable. This was her first such episode.
- AOrder magnetic resonance imaging of the brain before discharge
- BOrder urgent electroencephalography to confirm the diagnosis
- CPerform lumbar puncture to rule out meningitis before discharge
- DReassure the parents and manage the underlying febrile illness without further neuroimaging or lumbar puncture
Show answer
This is a simple febrile seizure: generalized, lasting less than 15 minutes, non-recurrent within 24 hours, with rapid return to baseline neurological status and a normal examination. Current guidelines state that children with a simple febrile seizure who appear well after the postictal period and have no signs of meningitis or other red flags do not require lumbar puncture, EEG, or neuroimaging. Management focuses on identifying and treating the source of fever and reassuring the parents about the generally benign and self-limited nature of simple febrile seizures. Red flags that would prompt further workup include seizure duration over 15 minutes, focal features, recurrence within 24 hours, incomplete recovery, or signs of meningitis.
- A. Neuroimaging is not indicated in a simple febrile seizure with normal neurological examination and full recovery.
- B. EEG is not indicated for a simple febrile seizure and does not change management or confirm the diagnosis.
- C. Lumbar puncture is unnecessary in a simple febrile seizure with a well-appearing child and no meningeal signs.
A 29-year-old woman at 34 weeks gestation is brought to the emergency department after having a witnessed generalized tonic-clonic seizure at home. On arrival, blood pressure is 168/112 mmHg, and she is confused but breathing spontaneously. Urine dipstick shows 3+ protein. There is no prior history of epilepsy. The fetal heart rate is 145 beats/min.
- AIntravenous levetiracetam loading dose for seizure control
- BIntravenous phenytoin loading dose followed by maintenance therapy
- CIntravenous magnesium sulfate loading dose followed by a maintenance infusion
- DIntravenous diazepam as the first-line anticonvulsant
Show answer
This patient has eclampsia, defined as new-onset generalized seizures in a woman with preeclampsia (hypertension and proteinuria) after 20 weeks gestation. Magnesium sulfate is the first-line agent for both treatment of the acute seizure and prevention of recurrent seizures in eclampsia, typically given as a 4-6 g intravenous loading dose over 15-20 minutes followed by a maintenance infusion of 1-2 g/hour, with monitoring for signs of magnesium toxicity such as loss of deep tendon reflexes and respiratory depression. Trials have consistently shown magnesium sulfate superior to phenytoin and benzodiazepines for eclamptic seizure control and recurrence prevention. Antihypertensive therapy and plans for delivery are also essential components of management alongside magnesium.
- A. Levetiracetam has no established role as first-line therapy for eclamptic seizures.
- B. Phenytoin is less effective than magnesium sulfate for eclamptic seizures and is not first-line therapy.
- D. Diazepam is not the first-line agent for eclampsia; it is reserved for seizures refractory to magnesium sulfate or as a temporary measure.
A 29-year-old woman delivers a 3.8 kg infant vaginally at a primary health centre in Riyadh after a prolonged second stage of labor. Ten minutes after delivery of the placenta, she develops heavy vaginal bleeding. Blood pressure is 92/58 mmHg, heart rate is 118 beats/min. On abdominal examination, the uterine fundus is soft and boggy, palpable above the umbilicus. The placenta appears complete and no perineal or vaginal lacerations are seen. Two large-bore intravenous lines have been inserted and crystalloid infusion has started. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- ABegin bimanual uterine massage and start an intravenous oxytocin infusion
- BProceed immediately to exploratory laparotomy
- CPerform uterine artery embolization
- DPack the vagina with sterile gauze and observe
Show answer
The soft, boggy uterus with heavy bleeding after delivery indicates uterine atony, the most common cause of postpartum hemorrhage. First-line management is bimanual uterine massage combined with uterotonic therapy, with intravenous oxytocin being the first-line agent per WHO and international obstetric guidelines. This stimulates uterine contraction, compresses the spiral arterioles, and reduces blood loss. Surgical or interventional radiology options are reserved for cases refractory to uterotonics and massage.
- B. Laparotomy is a last resort after conservative and medical measures fail to control atony-related bleeding.
- C. Embolization is an interventional radiology option reserved for refractory hemorrhage after medical management fails, not a first step.
- D. Vaginal packing does not address uterine atony and is not the appropriate initial intervention for a boggy, atonic uterus.
Ethics & Systems
2 questionsA bus collision on the Riyadh-Dammam highway results in 14 casualties brought to a district hospital emergency department simultaneously, overwhelming available staff and resources. Using START triage, the emergency physician evaluates four patients in sequence. Patient A is walking and talking with minor abrasions. Patient B has a respiratory rate of 34 breaths/min, absent radial pulse, and delayed capillary refill. Patient C has an obstructed airway that remains obstructed after repositioning, and has no palpable pulse. Patient D has a respiratory rate of 16 breaths/min, palpable radial pulse, but is unable to follow simple commands. What is the most appropriate triage category assignment for Patient B?
- ADelayed (yellow), stable enough to wait for definitive care
- BImmediate (red), requiring urgent intervention and transport
- CMinimal (green), to be reassessed after critical patients are managed
- DExpectant (black), as resuscitation is unlikely to succeed
Show answer
Under the START (Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment) algorithm used in mass casualty incidents, a respiratory rate greater than 30 breaths/min or absent radial pulse with delayed capillary refill both independently classify a patient as Immediate (red), indicating a need for urgent lifesaving intervention. Patient B meets both criteria, confirming the red category. The goal of triage in a mass casualty incident is to do the greatest good for the greatest number by rapidly identifying patients who will benefit most from immediate intervention. Patient C, with an unresponsive obstructed airway and no pulse, would be classified as expectant (black) since airway opening maneuvers have already failed.
- A. Yellow applies to patients without immediate life threats who can tolerate a delay in treatment, which does not match this patient's unstable respiratory rate and perfusion.
- C. Green is reserved for ambulatory patients with minor injuries who can delay care without compromise.
- D. Black is reserved for patients who are deceased or have unsurvivable injuries despite airway intervention, not for a patient with a treatable life threat.
A 54-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being found unconscious at home. He has a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 7, blood pressure 80/50 mmHg, and oxygen saturation of 88% on room air. No family members or identification documents are present, and no advance directive is available. The emergency physician determines that immediate airway management and resuscitation are required to prevent death or serious harm. Which ethical principle most directly justifies proceeding with treatment without obtaining consent?
- AImplied consent under the emergency doctrine, assuming a reasonable person would consent to lifesaving care
- BSubstituted judgment based on the patient's previously expressed wishes
- CBest interests standard as determined solely by the treating physician's personal judgment
- DTherapeutic privilege, allowing withholding of information believed to be harmful
Show answer
The emergency doctrine permits treatment without explicit consent when a patient is unable to communicate due to a life-threatening condition and no surrogate decision-maker is immediately available. This doctrine rests on implied consent, the legal and ethical presumption that a reasonable person would consent to necessary lifesaving treatment under these circumstances. It allows emergency physicians to act promptly to prevent death or serious harm while upholding patient autonomy in principle. Documentation of the emergency, the patient's incapacity, and the urgency of intervention supports this exception.
- B. Substituted judgment requires knowledge of the patient's previously expressed preferences, which are unavailable in this scenario.
- C. Best interests determined unilaterally by the physician is not the primary justification; the emergency doctrine relies on the presumption of implied consent, not solely physician discretion.
- D. Therapeutic privilege concerns withholding specific information from a capable patient, not treating an unconscious patient without consent.
[Trauma] FAST scan indication in unstable blunt abdominal trauma — angle: best t
1 questionsA 28-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a high-speed motor vehicle collision. His blood pressure is 82/54 mmHg, heart rate is 128/min, and respiratory rate is 26/min. He is diaphoretic and has diffuse abdominal tenderness with guarding. Breath sounds are equal bilaterally and the trachea is midline. Two large-bore intravenous lines are inserted and crystalloid infusion is started. Which of the following is the most appropriate next investigation?
- AContrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis
- BFocused assessment with sonography for trauma
- CDiagnostic peritoneal lavage
- DPlain radiograph of the abdomen
Show answer
In a hemodynamically unstable blunt trauma patient, bedside FAST is the test of choice because it can be performed rapidly in the resuscitation bay without moving the patient, detecting free intraperitoneal fluid with high specificity. A positive FAST with instability indicates the need for immediate laparotomy, bypassing further imaging. CT requires a stable patient and transport to the scanner, making it unsafe here. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is invasive and largely obsolete where ultrasound is available. Plain abdominal radiography has no role in detecting hemoperitoneum.
- A. CT requires hemodynamic stability and transport out of the resuscitation area, which is unsafe in this patient.
- C. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is invasive, time-consuming, and has largely been replaced by ultrasound.
- D. Plain abdominal radiography cannot reliably detect free intraperitoneal blood.
[Trauma] Cervical spine clearance criteria (NEXUS/Canadian C-spine rule) — angle
1 questionsA 24-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after falling off a bicycle. He is awake, alert, and oriented, with no alcohol or drug intoxication. He reports no neck pain and denies numbness or weakness in his limbs. On examination, blood pressure is 122/78 mmHg, heart rate is 84/min, there is no midline cervical tenderness, and there is no other distracting painful injury. He is currently immobilized in a rigid cervical collar. What is the most appropriate next step?
- AObtain a plain lateral cervical spine radiograph
- BKeep the cervical collar on and admit for observation
- CClinically clear the cervical spine without imaging
- DObtain computed tomography of the cervical spine
Show answer
The NEXUS criteria allow clinical clearance of the cervical spine without imaging if the patient has no midline cervical tenderness, no focal neurologic deficit, normal alertness, no intoxication, and no distracting injury. This patient satisfies all five low-risk criteria, so the collar can be safely removed after a full range-of-motion check without need for radiographs or CT. Imaging would expose him to unnecessary radiation and cost. Prolonged collar use without justification can cause discomfort and skin breakdown.
- A. Imaging is unnecessary when all NEXUS low-risk criteria are met.
- B. Continued immobilization without imaging is not indicated once the patient meets all low-risk clinical criteria.
- D. CT is reserved for patients who fail clinical clearance criteria or have high-risk features, not for low-risk patients.
[Trauma] Beck's triad and pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade — angle: diag
1 questionsA 35-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a stab wound to the left chest. His blood pressure is 78/50 mmHg, heart rate is 134/min, and respiratory rate is 28/min. Heart sounds are muffled, the jugular veins are distended, and breath sounds are equal and clear bilaterally. There is a 2 cm wound just left of the sternum at the fourth intercostal space with no active external bleeding. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- ATension pneumothorax
- BAcute myocardial infarction
- CCardiac tamponade
- DMassive hemothorax
Show answer
This patient has hypotension, muffled heart sounds, and distended neck veins, the classic Beck's triad, together with a penetrating wound overlying the cardiac box, strongly suggesting cardiac tamponade from pericardial blood accumulation. Clear and equal breath sounds argue against pneumothorax or hemothorax, which typically present with diminished breath sounds and a hyperresonant or dull hemithorax. Emergent pericardiocentesis or resuscitative thoracotomy is indicated to relieve tamponade physiology. Acute myocardial infarction does not explain jugular venous distension with muffled heart sounds in this trauma context.
- A. Tension pneumothorax causes decreased or absent breath sounds on the affected side and tracheal deviation, not present here.
- B. Myocardial infarction does not explain the penetrating chest wound location or the combination of muffled heart sounds and jugular distension.
- D. Massive hemothorax presents with decreased breath sounds and dullness to percussion over the affected hemithorax, not clear bilateral breath sounds.
[Trauma] Flail chest with paradoxical movement management — angle: management
1 questionsA 45-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being crushed between a car and a wall. His blood pressure is 110/70 mmHg, heart rate is 110/min, respiratory rate is 32/min, and oxygen saturation is 88% on room air. Examination shows a segment of the right chest wall that moves inward during inspiration and outward during expiration, with tenderness over multiple rib fractures confirmed on chest radiograph. Breath sounds are decreased on the right side. What is the most appropriate initial management?
- AImmediate surgical fixation of the rib fractures
- BHigh-dose intravenous corticosteroids
- CSupplemental oxygen with adequate analgesia and close monitoring
- DExternal strapping and manual stabilization of the chest wall
Show answer
Flail chest is managed initially with supplemental oxygen, aggressive pain control (including regional techniques such as epidural or intercostal nerve blocks when feasible), and close respiratory monitoring, since adequate analgesia allows better ventilation and reduces the risk of secondary pulmonary complications like atelectasis and pneumonia. Positive pressure ventilation is reserved for patients with respiratory failure, not as a routine first step. Surgical rib fixation is considered in selected cases but is not the initial emergency management. External strapping is outdated and can worsen hypoventilation by restricting chest wall movement, and corticosteroids have no role in flail chest.
- A. Surgical fixation is reserved for select cases with severe deformity or failure of conservative management, not the initial step.
- B. Corticosteroids have no established role in the management of flail chest.
- D. External strapping restricts chest wall movement and worsens ventilation; it is no longer recommended.
[Trauma] Glasgow Coma Scale calculation from scenario — angle: interpretation of
1 questionsA 30-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motorcycle accident. He does not open his eyes spontaneously but opens them in response to a painful sternal rub. He moans incomprehensible sounds but does not form words. On painful stimulation, he localizes and attempts to push the examiner's hand away. What is his Glasgow Coma Scale score?
- A10
- B11
- C9
- D8
Show answer
Eye opening to pain scores 2, incomprehensible sounds score 2 for verbal response, and localizing to pain scores 5 for motor response, giving a total GCS of 2 + 2 + 5 = 9. Accurate GCS calculation is essential because it guides decisions about airway protection, with a score of 8 or less generally indicating the need for definitive airway management. Each component (eye, verbal, motor) must be scored independently and summed, and errors in any single component change the total and clinical interpretation.
- A. This total would require a higher score in one of the components, which does not match the findings described.
- B. This total overestimates the patient's verbal or motor response compared with the scenario.
- D. This total underestimates the patient's motor response, which is localizing (score 5), not merely withdrawing or absent.
[Trauma] Epidural hematoma lucid interval and CT finding — angle: diagnosis
1 questionsA 19-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being struck on the left temple by a cricket ball. He briefly lost consciousness, then was awake and conversant with his family for about an hour. He now has a worsening headache, vomiting, and is difficult to arouse. Examination shows a dilated, poorly reactive left pupil and right-sided weakness. Noncontrast computed tomography of the head is most likely to show which finding?
- AA crescent-shaped hyperdense collection that crosses suture lines
- BA biconvex (lens-shaped) hyperdense collection that does not cross suture lines
- CDiffuse effacement of sulci with loss of grey-white differentiation
- DA hypodense collection with midline shift located over the frontal convexities
Show answer
This patient's lucid interval followed by rapid deterioration, together with a blown pupil and contralateral hemiparesis, is classic for an epidural hematoma, typically caused by injury to the middle meningeal artery after temporal bone fracture. On CT, epidural hematomas appear as biconvex (lentiform) hyperdense collections confined by suture lines, where the dura is tightly adherent to the skull. A crescent-shaped collection crossing suture lines describes a subdural hematoma, which usually has a different time course. Diffuse sulcal effacement with loss of grey-white differentiation suggests diffuse axonal injury or global hypoxic injury, and a hypodense frontal collection suggests a chronic subdural hematoma rather than this acute presentation.
- A. This crescent shape crossing suture lines describes a subdural hematoma, not the lucid-interval presentation described.
- C. This diffuse pattern is seen in diffuse axonal injury or global hypoxic-ischemic injury, not a focal arterial bleed.
- D. A hypodense collection suggests a chronic rather than acute hematoma, inconsistent with this acute deterioration.
[Trauma] Indications for emergent CT head after mild traumatic brain injury — an
1 questionsA 50-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after falling down a flight of stairs and hitting his head. He takes warfarin for a mechanical heart valve. He did not lose consciousness and has no vomiting or seizure. He reports a mild headache. His Glasgow Coma Scale score is 15, and neurologic examination is normal. There is a small abrasion on the forehead with no palpable skull deformity. What is the most appropriate next step?
- ANoncontrast computed tomography of the head
- BSkull radiograph to look for fracture
- CDischarge home with head injury advice and a follow-up appointment
- DMagnetic resonance imaging of the brain
Show answer
Current head injury guidelines recommend an urgent noncontrast CT head in any patient on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy who sustains a head injury, even with a normal GCS of 15 and no other red-flag features, because of the markedly increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Anticoagulation itself is an independent indication for imaging regardless of other clinical findings. Discharge without imaging is unsafe given the bleeding risk from warfarin. Skull radiography does not reliably detect intracranial hemorrhage, and MRI is not the first-line emergency investigation due to longer acquisition time and lower availability.
- B. Skull radiography cannot detect intracranial hemorrhage and is not used to guide management after head injury.
- C. Discharge without imaging is unsafe because anticoagulant use is itself an indication for CT regardless of normal GCS.
- D. MRI is not practical or first-line in the acute emergency setting due to longer scan time and lower availability.
[Trauma] Pelvic fracture initial stabilization with binder — angle: next step
1 questionsA 40-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department after being hit by a car. Her blood pressure is 86/56 mmHg and heart rate is 122/min. She has pelvic tenderness, and gentle compression of the iliac wings reveals instability with asymmetric movement. There is no obvious open wound. Two large-bore intravenous lines are placed and crystalloid infusion has begun. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AInsert bilateral chest tubes
- BPerform external fixation in the emergency department
- CObtain computed tomography of the pelvis with contrast
- DApply a pelvic binder at the level of the greater trochanters
Show answer
In a hemodynamically unstable patient with a clinically unstable pelvis, immediate application of a pelvic binder or sheet at the level of the greater trochanters reduces pelvic volume, limits further venous and bony bleeding, and provides temporary stabilization while further resuscitation and definitive management are arranged. This should be done before transport to CT, which requires relative stability. Formal external fixation is a surgical procedure performed by orthopedic trauma teams, not an emergency department first step. Chest tubes are unrelated to pelvic trauma unless there is a concurrent chest injury.
- A. Chest tube insertion is not indicated for pelvic trauma without evidence of pneumothorax or hemothorax.
- B. External fixation is a definitive orthopedic procedure performed later, not an immediate emergency department intervention.
- C. CT should only be performed once the patient is stabilized, not before temporary binder application in an unstable patient.
[Trauma] Compartment syndrome diagnosis and fasciotomy timing
1 questionsA 24-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motorcycle collision with a closed tibial shaft fracture, now casted 10 hours ago. He complains of severe leg pain unrelieved by morphine 0.1 mg/kg IV. On examination, the calf is tense and swollen, passive dorsiflexion of the toes causes severe pain, and the foot is cool with a faint posterior tibial pulse by Doppler. The cast is removed and the limb elevated, but symptoms persist 1 hour later. If fasciotomy is delayed beyond 8 hours from the onset of this condition, which of the following complications is most likely to result?
- ADeep venous thrombosis with subsequent pulmonary embolism
- BVolkmann ischemic contracture with irreversible muscle necrosis
- CComplex regional pain syndrome type I
- DFat embolism syndrome with hypoxemic respiratory failure
Show answer
Acute compartment syndrome causes a vicious cycle of rising intracompartmental pressure, reduced capillary perfusion pressure, and tissue ischemia. Muscle and nerve tissue tolerate ischemia poorly, and irreversible necrosis begins after about 6-8 hours of elevated compartment pressure. Delayed fasciotomy beyond this window leads to muscle fibrosis and contracture (Volkmann contracture) and permanent nerve damage rather than reversible injury. Diagnosis is clinical (pain out of proportion, pain on passive stretch, paresthesia) and should not wait for pulse loss, which occurs late.
- A. DVT/PE is not the characteristic complication of delayed decompression of a compartment syndrome.
- C. CRPS is a chronic pain disorder that can follow trauma but is not the direct consequence of delayed fasciotomy.
- D. Fat embolism relates to long bone fracture marrow embolization, not to delayed fasciotomy for compartment syndrome.
[Cardiovascular Emergencies] STEMI ECG localization and culprit artery
1 questionsA 58-year-old man presents with crushing chest pain for 1 hour radiating to the jaw. Blood pressure is 102/68 mmHg, heart rate 92 beats/min. ECG shows ST-segment elevation of 3 mm in leads II, III, and aVF, with ST depression in leads I and aVL. Which coronary artery is most likely occluded?
- ALeft anterior descending artery
- BLeft circumflex artery
- CLeft main coronary artery
- DRight coronary artery
Show answer
ST elevation in leads II, III, and aVF localizes the infarct to the inferior wall, which is supplied by the right coronary artery in about 80-90% of individuals (right-dominant circulation). Reciprocal ST depression in leads I and aVL supports an inferior STEMI. Right-sided leads (V4R) should be checked to assess for right ventricular involvement, since nitrates and preload-reducing agents should be avoided if RV infarction is present. The left circumflex is the culprit in most of the remaining inferior infarcts in left-dominant circulations.
- A. LAD occlusion produces anterior ST elevation in V1-V4, not the inferior pattern described.
- B. Left circumflex occlusion is the less common cause of inferior STEMI and typically occurs in left-dominant circulation, which is less frequent than right dominance.
- C. Left main occlusion typically causes widespread ST elevation in aVR and multiple leads with hemodynamic collapse, not an isolated inferior pattern.
[Cardiovascular Emergencies] Door-to-balloon time vs fibrinolysis decision in ST
1 questionsA 62-year-old man arrives at a primary health care center in a rural area with chest pain for 2 hours. ECG confirms an anterior STEMI. The nearest hospital with a cardiac catheterization laboratory is 150 km away, and transport time is estimated at 2.5 hours. He has no contraindications to thrombolytic therapy. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AGive aspirin and clopidogrel only, then observe for 6 hours before deciding
- BTransfer immediately by ambulance for primary percutaneous coronary intervention
- CStart intravenous unfractionated heparin alone and await cardiology consultation
- DAdminister fibrinolytic therapy immediately and arrange transfer
Show answer
When primary PCI cannot be performed within 120 minutes of first medical contact, fibrinolytic therapy should be given immediately, provided there are no contraindications, since timely reperfusion is the key determinant of myocardial salvage. Here the transport time alone exceeds the guideline-recommended window, so the patient should receive fibrinolysis without delay and then be transferred to a PCI-capable center for rescue or early PCI. Delaying treatment to transfer for primary PCI when transport exceeds 120 minutes worsens outcomes.
- A. Watching for 6 hours before deciding delays reperfusion therapy far beyond the acceptable window and risks further myocardial loss.
- B. Transfer alone without immediate fibrinolysis would unacceptably delay reperfusion given the 2.5-hour transport time, exceeding the 120-minute PCI window.
- C. Heparin alone without a reperfusion strategy does not open the occluded artery and is inadequate management of STEMI.
[Cardiovascular Emergencies] Absolute contraindication to thrombolysis
1 questionsA 55-year-old man presents with an acute anterior STEMI 90 minutes after symptom onset at a hospital without catheterization facilities. He mentions that he had a hemorrhagic stroke 8 months ago with full neurological recovery. His blood pressure is 128/80 mmHg. Which of the following is the most appropriate reason to withhold fibrinolytic therapy in this patient?
- ACurrent blood pressure above 120/80 mmHg
- BFull neurological recovery from a prior stroke
- CHistory of hemorrhagic stroke at any time in the past
- DAge greater than 50 years
Show answer
Any history of hemorrhagic stroke at any time is an absolute contraindication to fibrinolytic therapy because of the markedly increased risk of recurrent intracranial hemorrhage from thrombolytic-induced coagulopathy and disruption of the already compromised vascular bed. This holds regardless of the time elapsed since the event or the degree of recovery. Such patients should instead be transferred urgently for primary PCI even if this requires some delay, since the bleeding risk from lytics outweighs the benefit.
- A. A blood pressure of 128/80 mmHg is normal and not a contraindication; uncontrolled severe hypertension (e.g., above 180/110 mmHg) would be a relative contraindication.
- B. Full neurological recovery does not remove the risk of recurrent hemorrhage; the history of hemorrhagic stroke itself is the contraindication regardless of outcome.
- D. Advanced age alone is not an absolute contraindication, though it is a relative risk factor for intracranial hemorrhage with fibrinolysis.
[Cardiovascular Emergencies] Unstable tachyarrhythmia requiring synchronized car
1 questionsA 68-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department with palpitations and dizziness for 30 minutes. Blood pressure is 78/50 mmHg, heart rate 170 beats/min, and she is confused with cool extremities. ECG shows a regular narrow-complex tachycardia at 170 beats/min without visible P waves. An IV line is secured and oxygen is applied. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step?
- AIntravenous adenosine 6 mg rapid push
- BVagal maneuvers followed by observation
- CSynchronized cardioversion
- DIntravenous amiodarone infusion
Show answer
This patient has a narrow-complex tachycardia with signs of hemodynamic instability: hypotension, altered mental status, and poor perfusion. According to the ACLS tachycardia algorithm, any unstable tachyarrhythmia with a pulse requires immediate synchronized cardioversion regardless of the specific rhythm, rather than trialing pharmacologic agents first. Synchronization avoids delivering the shock during the T wave, which could precipitate ventricular fibrillation. Adenosine and vagal maneuvers are reserved for stable regular narrow-complex tachycardias.
- A. Adenosine is appropriate for stable regular narrow-complex SVT, not for a hemodynamically unstable patient who needs immediate cardioversion.
- B. Vagal maneuvers are a stable-patient strategy and would dangerously delay definitive treatment in this unstable patient.
- D. Amiodarone infusion is too slow an intervention for an unstable patient and is not first-line for unstable narrow-complex tachycardia.
[Cardiovascular Emergencies] Pulseless ventricular tachycardia ACLS algorithm st
1 questionsA 60-year-old man collapses in the emergency department waiting area. He is unresponsive and apneic, and no pulse is palpable. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is started and the monitor shows a regular wide-complex tachycardia at 180 beats/min. After the first unsynchronized shock is delivered, chest compressions are resumed immediately and an IV line is placed. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- APerform synchronized cardioversion at a higher energy level
- BGive amiodarone 300 mg IV immediately after the shock, before resuming CPR
- CCheck for a pulse immediately after the shock before resuming CPR
- DContinue CPR for 2 minutes, then give epinephrine 1 mg IV
Show answer
In pulseless ventricular tachycardia, which is treated as a shockable rhythm in the ACLS cardiac arrest algorithm, CPR is resumed immediately after defibrillation for a full 2-minute cycle without checking pulse or rhythm first. Epinephrine 1 mg IV is given as soon as possible (typically during this cycle) and repeated every 3-5 minutes. Rhythm and pulse are reassessed only after the 2-minute CPR cycle. Amiodarone 300 mg IV is reserved for refractory VF/pulseless VT after the second or third shock, not immediately after the first.
- A. Pulseless VT is treated with unsynchronized defibrillation, not synchronized cardioversion, since there is no perfusing rhythm to synchronize with.
- B. Amiodarone is indicated for refractory shockable rhythms after subsequent shocks, not immediately after the first shock before resuming compressions.
- C. Pulse and rhythm checks should not interrupt CPR immediately after a shock; compressions must resume right away for a full cycle.
[Cardiovascular Emergencies] Adenosine use and side effect in SVT
1 questionsA 26-year-old woman presents with sudden-onset palpitations for 20 minutes. Blood pressure is 118/76 mmHg, heart rate 180 beats/min, and she is alert with no chest pain. ECG shows a regular narrow-complex tachycardia without visible P waves. Vagal maneuvers fail to terminate the rhythm, so intravenous adenosine 6 mg is given as a rapid bolus followed by a saline flush. Within seconds, the patient reports chest tightness and the monitor briefly shows a flat line before sinus rhythm resumes. Which of the following best explains this transient finding? (Vital signs after the episode: BP 116/74 mmHg, HR 78 beats/min, oxygen saturation 98% on room air.)
- AVasovagal syncope triggered by the needle stick
- BDrug-induced torsades de pointes from QT prolongation
- CTransient high-grade AV block from adenosine's action on the AV node
- DAnaphylactic reaction with laryngeal edema and hypotension
Show answer
Adenosine acts on A1 receptors in the AV node, causing transient hyperpolarization and profound, brief slowing or complete block of AV conduction, which interrupts reentrant circuits in SVT. This commonly produces a few seconds of transient asystole or high-grade AV block on the monitor along with flushing, chest tightness, and dyspnea, all of which resolve within 10-20 seconds due to the drug's very short half-life (under 10 seconds). This is an expected, self-limited pharmacologic effect rather than a dangerous arrhythmia or allergic reaction, and the patient should be reassured and monitored.
- A. Vasovagal syncope is not temporally linked to the rapid IV push of adenosine and would not produce a flatline on the monitor from AV block.
- B. Torsades de pointes is associated with QT-prolonging drugs and would appear as polymorphic VT, not a brief flat line followed by return of sinus rhythm.
- D. Anaphylaxis would present with urticaria, bronchospasm, or persistent hypotension, not a transient flatline that resolves within seconds.
Frequently asked questions
Are these real SMLE questions?
No. They are original practice questions written in the style of SMLE for its content outline. Real exam items are confidential. Every question here was solved blind by a second, independent model and removed if the key was disputed.
How should I use these emergency medicine questions?
Do the quiz first without looking at the answers, then read the explanation for every question you missed or guessed. The educational objective under each answer is the fact to remember.
Are the questions free?
Yes. All questions, answers and explanations on this page are free and need no account.
More SMLE topics
Other exams
SMLE is administered by Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS). WhiteCoat Pro is not affiliated with or endorsed by them. All questions are original practice items written by the WhiteCoat Pro editorial team with AI assistance and checked by a second, independent AI model that solves every question blind; items with a disputed key are removed. They are not real exam questions. Educational use only, not medical advice.