Trauma Resuscitation
6 questionsA 32-year-old man is brought to the trauma bay after being stabbed in the right chest. He is in severe respiratory distress. Blood pressure is 78/44 mmHg, heart rate is 134/min, respiratory rate is 32/min, and oxygen saturation is 84% on 100% oxygen. The trachea is deviated to the left, the right hemithorax is hyperresonant to percussion, and breath sounds are absent on the right side. Jugular venous distension is noted. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- ADiaphragmatic rupture
- BFlail chest with pulmonary contusion
- CCardiac tamponade
- DTension pneumothorax
- EMassive hemothorax
Show answer
Tension pneumothorax is diagnosed clinically by the combination of hypotension, tracheal deviation away from the affected side, absent breath sounds, hyperresonance on percussion, and distended neck veins from impaired venous return. Air trapped in the pleural space under pressure collapses the ipsilateral lung and shifts the mediastinum, compressing the contralateral lung and great vessels. This is a clinical diagnosis that must be treated immediately without waiting for chest radiography. Hyperresonance distinguishes it from hemothorax, which presents with dullness to percussion.
- A. Diaphragmatic rupture typically shows bowel sounds in the chest and is diagnosed radiographically, not by tracheal deviation and hyperresonance.
- B. Flail chest presents with paradoxical chest wall movement, not tracheal deviation or unilateral absent breath sounds.
- C. Cardiac tamponade presents with muffled heart sounds and distended neck veins but normal, symmetric breath sounds without tracheal deviation.
- E. Massive hemothorax causes dullness to percussion and decreased breath sounds, not hyperresonance or tracheal deviation in this direction.
Two patients arrive separately after blunt chest trauma, both hypotensive with distended neck veins. Patient A has blood pressure 84/50 mmHg, muffled heart sounds, and clear, equal breath sounds bilaterally on auscultation. Patient B has blood pressure 80/48 mmHg, decreased breath sounds and dullness to percussion over the left hemithorax, with normal heart sounds. What is the most likely diagnosis in Patient B?
- AMassive hemothorax
- BAortic transection
- CTension pneumothorax
- DCardiac tamponade
- EPulmonary contusion
Show answer
Patient B has decreased breath sounds and dullness to percussion over one hemithorax, consistent with blood accumulating in the pleural space, defining massive hemothorax. The combination of hypotension and jugular venous distension in trauma can reflect either obstructive shock from tamponade or massive hemothorax causing mediastinal shift and impaired venous return; auscultation findings distinguish them. Patient A's muffled heart sounds with clear, symmetric breath sounds instead point to cardiac tamponade (Beck's triad: hypotension, jugular venous distension, muffled heart sounds). Massive hemothorax is managed with immediate chest tube drainage and consideration of thoracotomy if output exceeds defined thresholds.
- B. Aortic transection presents with findings such as unequal upper extremity pulses or widened mediastinum, not isolated unilateral dullness and decreased breath sounds.
- C. Tension pneumothorax causes hyperresonance, not dullness, to percussion over the affected side.
- D. Cardiac tamponade presents with muffled heart sounds and symmetric, clear breath sounds, which is Patient A's presentation, not Patient B's.
- E. Pulmonary contusion does not typically cause unilateral dullness to percussion or significant hypotension from blood loss alone.
A 40-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department after being struck by a car. She has bruising over the left upper quadrant of the abdomen and tenderness on palpation. Blood pressure is 86/54 mmHg, heart rate is 122/min, and respiratory rate is 24/min. She does not respond to a 1 L bolus of crystalloid. There is no obvious external hemorrhage. What is the most appropriate next investigation?
- AMRI of the abdomen
- BDiagnostic peritoneal lavage
- CPlain abdominal radiograph in the supine position
- DFocused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) in the emergency department
- ECT scan of the abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast
Show answer
In a hemodynamically unstable patient with blunt abdominal trauma, FAST is the investigation of choice because it is rapid, portable, repeatable, and can be performed in the resuscitation bay without interrupting ongoing resuscitation. It identifies free intraperitoneal fluid (presumed hemoperitoneum) and pericardial fluid, which guides the decision for emergency laparotomy. CT provides more detailed information but requires transporting an unstable patient to the scanner, which is unsafe. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is now largely obsolete, having been replaced by FAST in most trauma centres.
- A. MRI is too slow and impractical in the acute setting of an unstable trauma patient.
- B. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is invasive and has been largely replaced by FAST as the rapid bedside test in unstable trauma patients.
- C. Plain abdominal radiography has poor sensitivity for detecting hemoperitoneum or solid organ injury.
- E. CT requires transport to the radiology suite and patient stability, making it inappropriate for a patient who remains hypotensive after fluid resuscitation.
A 27-year-old man arrives after a high-speed motor vehicle collision with suspected intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Blood pressure is 88/56 mmHg, heart rate is 128/min, and he is confused. FAST shows free fluid in the abdomen, and the trauma surgery team is being mobilized for emergency laparotomy. While awaiting the operating room, what is the most appropriate resuscitation strategy?
- ATransfuse packed red blood cells, plasma, and platelets in a 1:1:1 ratio while targeting a systolic blood pressure around 90 mmHg
- BTransfuse packed red blood cells alone until hemoglobin reaches 100 g/L
- CInfuse large volumes of crystalloid to restore blood pressure to normal range before transfusion
- DAdminister vasopressors to achieve a mean arterial pressure above 90 mmHg before transfusion
- EWithhold blood products until formal crossmatch is completed, using crystalloid in the interim
Show answer
In hemorrhagic shock from suspected ongoing intra-abdominal bleeding, massive transfusion protocols now favour balanced resuscitation with packed red blood cells, plasma, and platelets in a 1:1:1 ratio, which more closely mimics whole blood and reduces dilutional coagulopathy. Permissive hypotension, targeting a systolic blood pressure of approximately 90 mmHg until definitive hemorrhage control in the operating room, avoids disrupting early clot formation and limits further blood loss, except in patients with traumatic brain injury where higher pressures are needed for cerebral perfusion. Excessive crystalloid worsens coagulopathy, dilutes clotting factors, and is no longer recommended as the primary resuscitation fluid in hemorrhagic shock.
- B. Transfusing red cells alone without plasma and platelets leads to dilutional coagulopathy and does not address the platelet and clotting factor deficits of massive hemorrhage.
- C. Large-volume crystalloid resuscitation dilutes clotting factors, worsens coagulopathy, and can dislodge early clots, worsening outcomes in hemorrhagic shock.
- D. Vasopressors do not replace volume or address the underlying coagulopathy and blood loss, and raising pressure further can worsen hemorrhage before surgical control.
- E. Delaying transfusion for formal crossmatch is unsafe in an exsanguinating patient; uncrossmatched or type O blood should be used emergently.
A 45-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department after being crushed between a loading dock and a truck. She has severe pelvic pain and bruising over the perineum. Blood pressure is 82/50 mmHg, heart rate is 130/min. Pelvic examination reveals instability on gentle compression of the iliac wings, and plain pelvic radiograph shows an open-book pelvic fracture. There is no obvious long bone deformity or external hemorrhage. What is the most appropriate immediate next step?
- AApply a pelvic binder at the level of the greater trochanters
- BProceed directly to the operating room for external fixation
- CApply bilateral lower limb traction splints
- DObtain a CT angiogram of the pelvis before any stabilization
- EPerform angioembolization of pelvic vessels
Show answer
In a hemodynamically unstable patient with an open-book pelvic fracture, immediate application of a pelvic binder at the level of the greater trochanters reduces pelvic volume, stabilizes the fracture, and tamponades venous and bony bleeding, which is the predominant source of pelvic hemorrhage. This simple, rapid intervention should be performed in the resuscitation bay before transfer for imaging or definitive fixation. CT angiography and angioembolization are valuable for identifying and treating arterial bleeding but should follow initial mechanical stabilization and are not the first step in an unstable patient.
- B. External fixation in the operating room is a subsequent step after temporary stabilization and resuscitation, not the immediate action in the trauma bay.
- C. Traction splints address long bone fractures, not pelvic ring instability, and are not indicated here.
- D. CT angiography requires patient transport and takes time; mechanical stabilization with a binder must occur first in an unstable patient.
- E. Angioembolization addresses arterial bleeding identified on imaging and follows, rather than precedes, initial pelvic binder application.
An 18-year-old man sustains blunt abdominal trauma in a snowboarding accident. On arrival, blood pressure is 92/60 mmHg and heart rate is 108/min, responding to a 1 L crystalloid bolus with blood pressure rising to 118/76 mmHg and heart rate falling to 88/min. He is alert and has left upper quadrant tenderness without peritonitis. CT scan of the abdomen with contrast shows a grade III splenic laceration with a small amount of perisplenic blood and no contrast blush. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- APerform urgent splenic artery angioembolization regardless of stability
- BProceed to exploratory laparotomy with splenic repair
- CPerform emergency splenectomy
- DDischarge home with outpatient follow-up in one week
- EAdmit for close observation with serial abdominal examinations and hemoglobin monitoring
Show answer
This hemodynamically stable patient who responds appropriately to initial fluid resuscitation, has no peritoneal signs, and has a CT scan without active contrast extravasation (blush) is an excellent candidate for nonoperative management of splenic injury, which is successful in the majority of blunt splenic trauma cases regardless of grade when hemodynamic stability is maintained. Management consists of admission, serial abdominal examinations, serial hemoglobin measurements, and bed rest with activity restriction. Operative intervention (splenectomy or splenorrhaphy) is reserved for hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, or failure of nonoperative management, and angioembolization is reserved for patients with contrast blush or ongoing bleeding, not routinely applied to a stable patient without a blush.
- A. Angioembolization is indicated for active contrast extravasation or ongoing instability, not for a stable patient without a blush on imaging.
- B. Exploratory laparotomy is unnecessary in a stable patient without peritonitis who is a candidate for nonoperative management.
- C. Emergency splenectomy is reserved for hemodynamic instability or failure of nonoperative management, neither of which is present here.
- D. Discharge is unsafe; this patient requires inpatient observation given the risk of delayed splenic bleeding.
Head & Spinal Trauma
1 questionsA 24-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motor vehicle collision. He has an obvious deformity of the left thigh and a laceration over the abdomen. His vital signs are: blood pressure 78/42 mmHg, heart rate 52/min, respiratory rate 20/min, oxygen saturation 97% on room air. His skin is warm and dry. He has no movement or sensation below the nipple line. Which of the following best explains the combination of hypotension and bradycardia in this patient?
- AReduced circulating blood volume from an occult intra-abdominal hemorrhage
- BCompensatory parasympathetic withdrawal in response to acute blood loss
- CDirect myocardial contusion impairing cardiac contractility
- DLoss of sympathetic vascular tone and cardiac sympathetic input below the level of spinal cord injury
- EIncreased catecholamine release causing reflex bradycardia
Show answer
Neurogenic shock results from disruption of descending sympathetic pathways after a high spinal cord injury (typically above T6), causing unopposed vagal tone, loss of vascular tone (vasodilation), and bradycardia rather than the tachycardia expected with hypovolemia. The warm, dry skin (not cool and clammy) and bradycardia in the setting of hypotension point to loss of sympathetic outflow rather than blood loss. Hemorrhagic shock classically produces tachycardia and cool, clammy skin due to compensatory sympathetic activation. Management of neurogenic shock emphasizes cautious fluids plus vasopressors, as aggressive fluid resuscitation alone will not correct the vasodilation.
- A. Hemorrhage would cause tachycardia and cool skin, not bradycardia with warm skin.
- B. Hemorrhage triggers sympathetic activation (tachycardia), not parasympathetic dominance.
- C. Myocardial contusion causes arrhythmia or pump failure, not this classic bradycardia-hypotension-warm skin triad.
- E. Catecholamine surges cause tachycardia, not bradycardia.
Burns & Environmental Injury
5 questionsA 45-year-old man presents to a community emergency department with a burn to his right hand sustained while cooking. On examination, there are blisters and a mottled red-white appearance involving the full circumference of the hand and extending onto the wrist, covering approximately 3% of his total body surface area. He has no other injuries and is hemodynamically stable. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- ATransfer to a specialized burn centre
- BApply silver sulfadiazine cream and arrange outpatient follow-up in one week
- CAdmit to the local hospital's general surgery ward for observation
- DPerform split-thickness skin grafting at the local hospital
- EDischarge home with daily dressing changes by a home care nurse
Show answer
Burns involving the hands, feet, face, perineum, or major joints, as well as any circumferential burn, meet criteria for referral to a specialized burn centre regardless of the total body surface area involved, because of the high risk of functional impairment and need for specialized wound and rehabilitation care. This patient's burn involves the hand and wrist circumferentially, both independent referral criteria. Other criteria include burns greater than 10% TBSA, full-thickness burns of any size, electrical or chemical burns, and burns with inhalational injury or significant comorbidities. Local management without specialist input risks contracture and loss of hand function.
- B. Topical therapy and delayed follow-up are inappropriate given the referral criteria met by this burn's location and circumferential nature.
- C. Simple observation at a non-specialized centre does not address the need for burn-specific wound care and monitoring for compartment syndrome.
- D. Skin grafting decisions and surgery for complex burns should be made at a specialized burn centre, not locally.
- E. A circumferential hand burn requires specialist assessment for escharotomy risk and functional outcome, not routine home dressing care.
A 32-year-old woman is rescued from a house fire and brought to the emergency department. She is confused and complains of headache and nausea. Her vital signs are: blood pressure 118/76 mmHg, heart rate 102/min, respiratory rate 18/min, and oxygen saturation 99% on room air by pulse oximetry. There is no soot in her nostrils or mouth, and her voice is normal. What is the most appropriate immediate management?
- AAdminister intravenous naloxone for suspected opioid-related confusion
- BAdminister 100% oxygen by non-rebreather mask
- CReassure the patient that her oxygen saturation is normal and discharge home
- DOrder a chest radiograph before initiating any oxygen therapy
- EObtain an arterial blood gas only if her oxygen saturation drops below 94%
Show answer
Standard pulse oximetry cannot distinguish carboxyhemoglobin from oxyhemoglobin and will display a falsely normal or near-normal saturation in carbon monoxide poisoning, so a normal reading does not exclude significant exposure. This patient's headache, nausea, confusion, and fire exposure are classic for carbon monoxide toxicity, and treatment with 100% oxygen via non-rebreather mask should begin immediately without waiting for confirmatory carboxyhemoglobin levels, as it accelerates dissociation of carbon monoxide from hemoglobin and reduces the half-life of carboxyhemoglobin from several hours to about 60-90 minutes. Co-oximetry (measuring carboxyhemoglobin directly) should be obtained to confirm the diagnosis and guide decisions about hyperbaric oxygen therapy, but treatment should not be delayed for this. Discharging the patient based on a reassuring pulse oximetry reading would be a dangerous error.
- A. There is no indication of opioid overdose; the history and symptoms point to carbon monoxide exposure.
- C. A normal pulse oximetry reading is falsely reassuring in carbon monoxide poisoning and does not exclude significant exposure.
- D. Oxygen therapy should begin immediately and should not be delayed for imaging.
- E. Co-oximetry (not relying on pulse oximetry trends) should be obtained regardless of the saturation reading given this clinical presentation.
A 29-year-old man sustains a full-thickness circumferential burn to his right forearm in an industrial accident. Six hours after the injury, he reports severe pain in the forearm that has worsened despite analgesia. On examination, the forearm is tense and swollen, the skin is leathery and insensate, and the radial pulse is difficult to palpate using Doppler. Passive extension of the fingers markedly worsens his pain. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AElevate the limb and reassess in 2 hours
- BObtain a CT angiogram of the forearm before any intervention
- CApply a cool compress and increase intravenous fluid rate
- DAdminister intravenous mannitol to reduce tissue edema
- EPerform escharotomy of the forearm
Show answer
This patient has clinical signs of compartment syndrome from a circumferential full-thickness burn: severe pain disproportionate to the injury, pain with passive stretch, and diminished distal pulses, caused by the inelastic eschar restricting swelling tissue beneath it. Escharotomy, a surgical incision through the eschar down to but not through the fascia along the mid-lateral or mid-medial lines, must be performed urgently to relieve pressure and restore perfusion. Waiting to reassess or relying on imaging risks irreversible ischemic damage and limb loss, since the diagnosis is clinical and time-sensitive. Mannitol and cooling do not address the mechanical constriction caused by the eschar.
- A. Delaying definitive treatment to reassess risks progression to irreversible muscle and nerve ischemia.
- B. Imaging would delay time-sensitive treatment; the diagnosis here is made clinically.
- C. Cooling and increased fluids do not address the underlying compartment syndrome caused by the eschar.
- D. Mannitol does not relieve the mechanical constriction caused by the inelastic eschar.
A 50-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after being found outdoors in freezing temperatures for several hours. His fingers on both hands are pale, hard, and cold to touch, with no sensation. Core temperature is 36.2°C. What is the most appropriate initial management of the affected fingers?
- ARub the fingers vigorously with a warm cloth
- BMassage the fingers to improve circulation before rewarming
- CImmerse the hands in warm water at 37-39°C
- DAllow the fingers to rewarm slowly at room temperature
- EApply dry heat from a heating pad set to high
Show answer
The treatment of frostbite is rapid rewarming by immersion in a water bath maintained at 37-39°C for 15-30 minutes until the tissue becomes soft and a red-purple colour returns. Water baths provide even, controlled heat transfer and avoid the burns or further tissue trauma caused by dry heat sources or friction. Rubbing or massaging frostbitten tissue causes mechanical damage to already fragile, ice-crystal-laden cells and should be avoided. Slow rewarming at room or ambient temperature prolongs tissue exposure to damaging intermediate temperatures and worsens outcomes compared with rapid controlled rewarming.
- A. Rubbing causes mechanical trauma to fragile frostbitten tissue and should never be used.
- B. Massage causes further mechanical damage to the tissue and does not aid rewarming.
- D. Slow rewarming at room temperature prolongs exposure to damaging temperatures and worsens tissue outcomes compared with rapid water-bath rewarming.
- E. Dry heat sources such as heating pads risk uneven heating and thermal burns to insensate tissue.
A 68-year-old man is found unresponsive outdoors after being lost for several hours in sub-zero temperatures. On arrival in the emergency department, his core temperature is 27°C, blood pressure is 80/50 mmHg, and his cardiac monitor shows an irregular rhythm with occasional ectopic beats. He has a weak carotid pulse. What is the most appropriate approach to handling and resuscitating this patient?
- APerform vigorous chest compressions and active limb manipulation to stimulate circulation
- BTransport the patient on his side with frequent repositioning every 5 minutes to prevent pressure injury
- CRapidly reposition the patient from supine to sitting to assess orthostatic changes
- DHandle the patient gently and minimize movement during rewarming and resuscitation
- EInsert a central venous catheter through the subclavian vein immediately for rapid infusion
Show answer
Severely hypothermic patients, particularly those with core temperatures below 28-30°C, are at high risk of ventricular fibrillation triggered by rough handling, movement, or mechanical stimulation of the irritable, cold myocardium. Gentle handling with minimal movement during extraction, transport, and rewarming is essential to avoid precipitating a lethal arrhythmia, and the patient should be kept horizontal rather than moved to sitting or standing positions. Core rewarming should proceed carefully, with cardiac monitoring continued throughout, while avoiding any unnecessary physical stimulation of the patient. Central venous catheterization and vigorous manipulation both carry a recognized risk of inducing ventricular fibrillation in this setting and should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.
- A. Vigorous compressions and limb manipulation in a hypothermic patient with a perfusing rhythm risk inducing ventricular fibrillation.
- B. Frequent repositioning introduces unnecessary mechanical stimulation that can precipitate arrhythmia in the hypothermic heart.
- C. Rapid repositioning to sitting can precipitate cardiac arrhythmia in a hypothermic, hemodynamically unstable patient.
- E. Central venous catheterization through the subclavian vein carries a particular risk of triggering ventricular fibrillation in severe hypothermia and should be avoided unless essential.
Acute Abdomen
7 questionsA 52-year-old woman presents with 10 hours of constant right upper quadrant pain radiating to the right shoulder, associated with nausea and vomiting. Temperature is 38.1°C, heart rate is 102/min, and blood pressure is 128/82 mmHg. On examination, she has sharp inspiratory arrest on deep palpation of the right subcostal region. Sclera are anicteric. Leukocyte count is 13.8 x10^9/L, total bilirubin is 14 µmol/L, and alkaline phosphatase is normal. She has no prior biliary surgery.
- AContrast-enhanced CT abdomen
- BHepatobiliary iminodiacetic acid (HIDA) scan
- CMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
- DEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
- ERight upper quadrant ultrasound
Show answer
Right upper quadrant ultrasound is the first-line investigation for suspected acute cholecystitis because it is widely available, rapid, inexpensive, and has high sensitivity for gallstones, gallbladder wall thickening (>3 mm), pericholecystic fluid, and a sonographic Murphy's sign. This patient's positive Murphy's sign, fever, and leukocytosis fit the Tokyo Guidelines criteria for acute cholecystitis, and ultrasound confirms the diagnosis in the large majority of cases. CT and MRCP are reserved for equivocal ultrasound findings or suspected complications, while HIDA scan and ERCP have no role as the initial test here since there is no evidence of choledocholithiasis.
- A. CT is less sensitive than ultrasound for detecting gallstones and is not first-line for suspected cholecystitis.
- B. HIDA scan is more sensitive but less available and is used when ultrasound findings are equivocal, not as the initial test.
- C. MRCP is reserved for evaluating suspected common bile duct stones, not as the initial test for cholecystitis.
- D. ERCP is a therapeutic procedure for bile duct stones, not a diagnostic first step, and carries procedural risk.
A 68-year-old man presents to the emergency department with 2 days of fever and chills, right upper quadrant pain, and dark urine. Temperature is 39.2°C, heart rate is 118/min, blood pressure is 96/58 mmHg, and he appears confused. Sclera are icteric. Laboratory investigations show leukocyte count 19.5 x10^9/L, total bilirubin 68 µmol/L, alkaline phosphatase 310 U/L, and ALT 95 U/L. Ultrasound shows a dilated common bile duct with a stone at the distal end. After fluid resuscitation and initiation of broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics, blood pressure remains 90/60 mmHg.
- AObservation with serial liver enzymes over 48 hours
- BOral ursodeoxycholic acid to dissolve the common bile duct stone
- CUrgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for biliary decompression
- DRepeat abdominal ultrasound in 6 hours to reassess duct dilation
- ELaparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24 hours
Show answer
This patient meets criteria for acute ascending cholangitis with Charcot's triad (fever, jaundice, RUQ pain) and features of severe (Grade III) disease per the Tokyo Guidelines, including hypotension and altered mental status despite initial resuscitation. Urgent biliary decompression, most commonly by ERCP with sphincterotomy and stone extraction or stent placement, is the definitive next step and should not be delayed since persistent biliary obstruction with infection can rapidly progress to septic shock and death. Cholecystectomy addresses the gallbladder but does not relieve the ductal obstruction causing sepsis, and it is deferred until after decompression and clinical stabilization.
- A. Observation is inappropriate given hemodynamic instability and altered mental status indicating severe cholangitis.
- B. Oral bile acid therapy is used for small cholesterol gallstones electively, not for acute obstructive cholangitis.
- D. Repeating ultrasound delays definitive decompression in a patient with ongoing septic shock.
- E. Cholecystectomy does not relieve the common bile duct obstruction and is not the urgent priority in septic cholangitis.
A 45-year-old woman with a history of heavy alcohol use presents with 8 hours of severe, constant epigastric pain radiating to the back, accompanied by vomiting. Heart rate is 108/min, blood pressure is 110/70 mmHg, and respiratory rate is 22/min. Abdominal examination shows epigastric tenderness without rebound. Serum lipase is 620 U/L (reference upper limit 160 U/L). Abdominal ultrasound shows no gallstones. She has no prior episodes of similar pain.
- AContrast-enhanced CT abdomen is required now to confirm the diagnosis
- BClinical diagnosis is established; no further confirmatory imaging is required
- CMagnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography is required to establish the diagnosis
- DSerum amylase must also be elevated above threshold to confirm diagnosis
- EDiagnostic laparoscopy is indicated to confirm pancreatic inflammation
Show answer
The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis requires two of three criteria: characteristic epigastric pain radiating to the back, serum lipase or amylase greater than three times the upper limit of normal, and characteristic findings on imaging. This patient has typical pain and a lipase level nearly four times the upper limit of normal, so the diagnosis is clinically established and imaging is not required to confirm it. CT is reserved for diagnostic uncertainty, failure to improve within 48 to 72 hours, or assessment of complications such as necrosis, not for routine confirmation. Early contrast CT can also worsen pancreatic injury and is avoided unless specifically indicated.
- A. CT is not required when clinical and biochemical criteria already establish the diagnosis; it is reserved for complications or uncertainty.
- C. MRCP is used to evaluate for choledocholithiasis as a cause, not to establish the diagnosis of pancreatitis itself.
- D. Only one of amylase or lipase needs to be elevated above threshold; both are not required.
- E. Diagnostic laparoscopy has no role in establishing the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis.
A 38-year-old woman is admitted with mild gallstone pancreatitis confirmed by typical pain, lipase 540 U/L, and ultrasound showing gallbladder stones without common bile duct dilation. She is treated with intravenous fluids and analgesia. By hospital day 3, her pain has resolved, she is tolerating a regular diet, and repeat laboratory values show lipase 95 U/L and normal liver enzymes. She has no fever and is hemodynamically stable.
- ALaparoscopic cholecystectomy during this same admission
- BDischarge home with elective cholecystectomy scheduled in 6 weeks
- CEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography before discharge regardless of duct findings
- DDischarge home with no cholecystectomy unless symptoms recur
- EDischarge home with elective cholecystectomy scheduled in 6 months
Show answer
For mild gallstone pancreatitis, laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be performed during the index admission once the pancreatitis has clinically resolved, since delaying surgery significantly increases the risk of recurrent pancreatitis, cholecystitis, or other biliary complications while awaiting outpatient surgery. This patient has resolved pain, improving enzymes, and tolerance of oral intake, indicating she is a good candidate for same-admission cholecystectomy. ERCP is not indicated here because there is no evidence of persistent common bile duct obstruction. Delaying cholecystectomy to an outpatient date, whether weeks or months later, exposes the patient to unnecessary risk of recurrence.
- B. Delaying cholecystectomy by 6 weeks increases the risk of recurrent gallstone-related complications compared to same-admission surgery.
- C. ERCP is unnecessary without evidence of common bile duct stones or dilation on imaging.
- D. Omitting cholecystectomy leaves the underlying cause unaddressed and risks recurrent pancreatitis.
- E. A 6-month delay carries even greater risk of recurrent pancreatitis or cholecystitis before definitive surgery.
A 58-year-old man with a history of osteoarthritis treated with regular ibuprofen presents with sudden severe epigastric pain that began 3 hours ago and has since become generalized. Heart rate is 122/min, blood pressure is 98/62 mmHg, and temperature is 37.6°C. Abdominal examination shows a rigid, board-like abdomen with absent bowel sounds and involuntary guarding throughout. He is kept nil by mouth, and intravenous fluids and broad-spectrum antibiotics are started.
- AAbdominal ultrasound to assess for free fluid
- BOral contrast upper gastrointestinal series
- CUpper endoscopy to directly visualize the ulcer
- DUpright chest X-ray showing free air under the diaphragm
- EDiagnostic peritoneal lavage
Show answer
An upright chest X-ray demonstrating free air under the diaphragm (pneumoperitoneum) is a rapid, widely available test that strongly supports the diagnosis of a perforated hollow viscus such as a peptic ulcer, particularly in a patient with risk factors like chronic NSAID use and a sudden onset of severe pain progressing to peritonitis. While CT abdomen is more sensitive and often obtained if the diagnosis remains uncertain or for surgical planning, the upright chest X-ray is a quick initial test that can confirm the diagnosis and expedite the path to emergency surgery. Upper endoscopy and oral contrast studies are contraindicated or unhelpful in this setting due to the risk of worsening perforation or peritoneal contamination. The clinical priority once perforation is suspected is urgent surgical consultation for operative repair, usually by laparoscopic or open omental patch closure.
- A. Ultrasound is insensitive for detecting free intraperitoneal air compared to plain radiography or CT.
- B. Oral contrast risks further peritoneal contamination and is not used when perforation is suspected.
- C. Upper endoscopy risks insufflating air through the perforation and worsening peritoneal contamination.
- E. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is an outdated technique not used in the modern evaluation of suspected perforation.
A 64-year-old woman with a history of open hysterectomy 8 years ago presents with 2 days of crampy abdominal pain, distension, and multiple episodes of vomiting. She has not passed flatus for 24 hours. Heart rate is 92/min, blood pressure is 122/76 mmHg, and temperature is 37.1°C. Abdominal examination shows distension with high-pitched bowel sounds and mild diffuse tenderness without rebound or guarding. Abdominal X-ray shows multiple dilated small bowel loops with air-fluid levels and no evidence of free air. Laboratory values are unremarkable.
- AEmergency CT-guided percutaneous drainage
- BOral contrast challenge followed by discharge if asymptomatic
- CNasogastric decompression, intravenous fluids, and serial abdominal examinations
- DColonoscopic decompression
- EImmediate exploratory laparotomy
Show answer
This patient has an adhesive small bowel obstruction, the most common cause of SBO in a patient with prior abdominal surgery, and shows no signs of strangulation such as fever, peritonitis, or leukocytosis. Initial management is conservative with nasogastric decompression, intravenous fluid resuscitation, bowel rest, and correction of electrolyte abnormalities, with serial examinations to monitor for signs of ischemia or clinical deterioration. Most adhesive SBOs resolve with this approach, and surgery is reserved for those with evidence of strangulation, peritonitis, or failure to improve after a trial of conservative management, typically 48 to 72 hours. Discharge without inpatient monitoring and decompression would be unsafe given ongoing obstruction.
- A. Percutaneous drainage has no role in the management of simple adhesive small bowel obstruction.
- B. An oral contrast challenge may be used to predict resolution but discharging a symptomatic obstructed patient home is unsafe.
- D. Colonoscopic decompression is used for large bowel obstruction or volvulus, not small bowel obstruction.
- E. Immediate surgery is not required in the absence of peritonitis, strangulation, or failure of conservative therapy.
A 74-year-old woman with chronic atrial fibrillation on apixaban presents with a 6-hour history of severe, diffuse abdominal pain that began suddenly. She has vomited twice and had one episode of loose, dark red stool. Her heart rate is 112/min and irregular, blood pressure is 102/68 mmHg, and temperature is 37.6°C. The abdomen is soft and only mildly tender to palpation, with no guarding or rebound, despite her reporting the pain as 9/10. Bowel sounds are decreased. Serum lactate is 4.8 mmol/L (normal <2.0 mmol/L).
- AAcute diverticulitis
- BSmall bowel obstruction
- CAcute pancreatitis
- DPerforated peptic ulcer
- EAcute mesenteric ischemia
Show answer
The hallmark of acute mesenteric ischemia is pain out of proportion to physical findings, caused by embolic or thrombotic occlusion of the superior mesenteric artery leading to bowel wall ischemia before peritoneal signs develop. Atrial fibrillation is the classic risk factor, as a cardiac thrombus embolizes to the SMA. Elevated lactate reflects anaerobic metabolism from bowel ischemia. Early recognition is critical because peritonitis signifies transmural infarction and a much worse prognosis.
- A. Diverticulitis typically causes localized left lower quadrant tenderness proportional to the pain.
- B. Obstruction causes crampy pain with distension and high-pitched bowel sounds, not pain-exam mismatch.
- C. Pancreatitis causes epigastric pain with tenderness that correlates with severity and typically elevates lipase.
- D. A perforated ulcer causes peritonitis with marked guarding and rigidity matching the pain severity.
Hernias & Abdominal Wall
3 questionsA 68-year-old man presents with a right groin bulge that has been present for 6 months, usually reducible. Today it has become firm, tender, and non-reducible for the past 3 hours. He has no fever, his abdomen is soft, and he is passing flatus normally. Heart rate is 82/min and temperature is 37.1°C. A second 74-year-old man has a similar groin bulge that is non-reducible, with overlying skin erythema, severe constant pain, fever of 38.6°C, heart rate of 118/min, and diffuse abdominal tenderness.
- ABoth patients require immediate surgical exploration within the hour
- BThe first patient needs emergency surgery; the second can wait for elective repair once afebrile
- CBoth patients can be managed with outpatient follow-up since neither has peritonitis confirmed on imaging
- DThe first patient can be discharged home with elective hernia repair scheduled in 6 months; the second needs urgent surgery
- EThe first patient warrants attempted reduction and urgent (same-day) surgical referral; the second requires emergency surgical referral for suspected strangulation
Show answer
An incarcerated hernia that is non-reducible but without signs of strangulation (fever, tachycardia, erythema, or peritonitis) warrants urgent same-day surgical referral because of the risk of progression to strangulation, with gentle attempted reduction sometimes appropriate if performed promptly. A strangulated hernia, signaled by fever, tachycardia, overlying skin changes, and systemic toxicity, indicates compromised blood supply and bowel ischemia, requiring emergency surgery without delay to prevent bowel necrosis and perforation. Distinguishing these presentations guides the urgency of operative intervention and is a key safety point in surgical triage.
- A. Simple incarceration without strangulation signs does not require emergency surgery within the hour; urgent same-day referral is appropriate.
- B. The reasoning is reversed; the first has no systemic toxicity while the second shows clear signs of strangulation requiring emergency care.
- C. Both patients show concerning features (non-reducibility, systemic signs in the second) that preclude simple outpatient follow-up.
- D. Discharging a non-reducible incarcerated hernia for elective repair in 6 months risks progression to strangulation and bowel infarction.
A 76-year-old woman presents with a small, firm, non-reducible bulge just below the inguinal ligament on the right side, medial to the femoral pulse. She reports moderate pain for the past 4 hours without fever. On examination, the mass is tender but there is no overlying erythema and her abdomen is soft. The surgical resident asks why this type of hernia is prioritized for earlier surgical repair compared to a similarly sized reducible inguinal hernia.
- AFemoral hernias have a lower overall lifetime incidence of strangulation than inguinal hernias
- BFemoral hernias are typically larger at presentation, making strangulation less likely due to a wider defect
- CFemoral hernias have a wider, more compliant neck that allows easier bowel herniation without complication
- DFemoral hernias are more likely to contain omentum only, which rarely causes complications
- EFemoral hernias occur through a narrow, rigid femoral canal bounded by unyielding structures, predisposing to incarceration and strangulation
Show answer
The femoral canal is bounded by rigid structures, the inguinal ligament anteriorly, the lacunar ligament medially, and the pectineal ligament posteriorly, creating a narrow, unforgiving space. This anatomic rigidity means that even a small amount of herniated bowel or omentum can become trapped and have its blood supply compromised, giving femoral hernias a disproportionately high risk of incarceration and strangulation relative to their size. Because of this risk, femoral hernias are generally repaired promptly upon diagnosis even when asymptomatic, unlike many small reducible inguinal hernias which can sometimes be managed with watchful waiting. This anatomic principle is the basis for prioritizing earlier surgical referral for femoral hernias.
- A. Femoral hernias actually carry a higher lifetime risk of strangulation than inguinal hernias.
- B. Femoral hernias are typically small, and their small rigid defect is exactly what predisposes to strangulation.
- C. The femoral canal is narrow and rigid, not wide and compliant, which is precisely why strangulation risk is high.
- D. Femoral hernias can contain bowel, bladder, or omentum, and bowel involvement carries high strangulation risk.
A 4-month-old infant is brought by his mother for a soft bulge at the umbilicus that protrudes when the baby cries and reduces easily with gentle pressure. The infant is otherwise healthy, feeding well, and gaining weight appropriately. On examination, the defect is approximately 1 cm in diameter, non-tender, and easily reducible, with no overlying skin changes.
- AOrder an abdominal ultrasound to assess the fascial defect before deciding on management
- BReassure the mother that most umbilical hernias of this size resolve spontaneously by 4-5 years of age and watchful waiting is appropriate
- CRefer for surgical repair now to prevent incarceration
- DApply a coin or firm binder taping over the hernia to promote closure
- EStart the infant on proton pump inhibitor therapy to reduce intra-abdominal pressure from reflux
Show answer
Umbilical hernias are common in infants due to incomplete closure of the umbilical ring and the majority, especially those under 1.5 cm, close spontaneously by 4 to 5 years of age without intervention. Watchful waiting with reassurance is the appropriate management for an asymptomatic, easily reducible umbilical hernia in an otherwise healthy infant. Surgical referral is reserved for hernias that persist beyond age 4-5 years, are large (greater than 1.5-2 cm), or become incarcerated, strangulated, or symptomatic. Taping, binding, or coin application has no evidence of benefit and is not recommended.
- A. Ultrasound is unnecessary for a clinically straightforward, easily reducible umbilical hernia in an asymptomatic infant.
- C. Elective surgery is not indicated for an asymptomatic reducible umbilical hernia in infancy given the high rate of spontaneous closure.
- D. Taping or coin application does not accelerate closure and is not a recommended intervention.
- E. There is no indication of reflux-related pathology, and PPI therapy has no role in management of umbilical hernia.
Vascular Surgery
5 questionsA 66-year-old man with atrial fibrillation presents with sudden onset of severe pain in his left leg that began 2 hours ago. The leg is pale and cool from the mid-thigh down, with absent popliteal and pedal pulses on Doppler. He reports numbness in the foot and is unable to dorsiflex or plantarflex his toes. Capillary refill is absent. His heart rate is 128/min and irregularly irregular.
- ADischarge with compression stockings and a prescription for cilostazol
- BAdminister intravenous heparin and arrange emergency vascular surgery consultation for urgent revascularization
- CStart oral rivaroxaban and arrange outpatient vascular surgery follow-up within 1 week
- DObtain ankle-brachial index measurements and reassess in 24 hours
- EApply a warm compress to promote vasodilation and improve distal perfusion
Show answer
This patient presents with the classic 6 P's of acute limb ischemia: pain, pallor, pulselessness, paresthesia, paralysis, and poikilothermia (coolness), likely from an embolus originating from atrial fibrillation. Motor and sensory deficits indicate advanced ischemia with a limited window, generally within 6 hours, before irreversible muscle and nerve damage occurs. Immediate anticoagulation with intravenous heparin should be started to prevent clot propagation while emergency vascular surgery is consulted for urgent revascularization, whether by embolectomy, thrombolysis, or bypass. Delay for outpatient measures or non-urgent testing risks limb loss.
- A. Cilostazol and compression stockings are treatments for chronic peripheral arterial disease, not acute limb-threatening ischemia.
- C. Oral anticoagulation and outpatient follow-up are far too delayed for a limb with sensory and motor deficits from acute ischemia.
- D. Ankle-brachial index and 24-hour reassessment are inappropriate delays when limb-threatening ischemia with neurologic deficit is present.
- E. Warmth increases tissue metabolic demand in an already ischemic limb and can worsen injury.
A 54-year-old woman presents with 3 days of right calf swelling and tenderness. She has no history of cancer, recent surgery, or immobilization, and the leg is not swollen more than 3 cm compared with the other side. There is no pitting edema and no collateral superficial veins. Her heart rate is 78/min. Using the Wells score, she is classified as low pretest probability for deep vein thrombosis. What is the most appropriate next step?
- AOrder bilateral lower limb venography
- BOrder a CT venogram of the pelvis and leg
- COrder compression ultrasonography of the leg
- DBegin empiric therapeutic anticoagulation
- EOrder a high-sensitivity D-dimer test
Show answer
In patients with low pretest probability by the Wells score, a high-sensitivity D-dimer test is the appropriate initial investigation. If the D-dimer is negative, deep vein thrombosis is effectively excluded without further imaging. If positive, compression ultrasonography is then performed to confirm the diagnosis. This stepwise algorithm avoids unnecessary imaging in low-risk patients while maintaining high sensitivity for ruling out clot.
- A. Venography is invasive and obsolete as a first-line test; it is reserved for rare equivocal cases.
- B. CT venography is not a standard first-line test for suspected lower limb DVT.
- C. Ultrasonography is used after a positive D-dimer or in moderate-to-high pretest probability, not as the first step in low-risk patients.
- D. Empiric anticoagulation is not indicated before risk stratification and testing in a hemodynamically stable patient.
A 45-year-old otherwise healthy man is diagnosed with an acute proximal deep vein thrombosis of the left leg confirmed by compression ultrasonography. His creatinine clearance is 95 mL/min, and he has no history of malignancy, gastrointestinal bleeding, or valvular heart disease. He is not pregnant and takes no other medications. According to current Canadian guidelines, what is the most appropriate initial anticoagulant choice for long-term treatment?
- AWarfarin with bridging low-molecular-weight heparin
- BUnfractionated heparin infusion alone
- CLow-molecular-weight heparin alone for the full treatment course
- DAspirin
- ERivaroxaban
Show answer
Direct oral anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban or apixaban are first-line therapy for most patients with acute deep vein thrombosis without cancer, renal failure, or antiphospholipid syndrome, per Thrombosis Canada and international guidelines. They do not require routine monitoring or bridging and have similar efficacy with less bleeding risk compared with warfarin. Warfarin requires several days of overlap with a parenteral anticoagulant to achieve therapeutic effect, which is no longer preferred when a DOAC can be used. Low-molecular-weight heparin monotherapy remains preferred in cancer-associated thrombosis.
- A. Warfarin with bridging is an older strategy, now reserved for situations where DOACs are contraindicated, such as severe renal impairment or valvular disease requiring vitamin K antagonist therapy.
- B. Unfractionated heparin alone is used for initial anticoagulation in specific situations like severe renal failure, not as first-line long-term therapy.
- C. Low-molecular-weight heparin monotherapy is preferred in cancer-associated thrombosis, not in this patient without malignancy.
- D. Aspirin is not adequate anticoagulation for treatment of acute proximal DVT.
A 70-year-old man presents 10 days after an episode of right-sided weakness and slurred speech that resolved completely within 45 minutes. Carotid duplex ultrasonography shows 75% stenosis of the left internal carotid artery. He has well-controlled hypertension and no other comorbidities. His modified Rankin score is 0. What is the most appropriate management?
- AHigh-intensity statin therapy alone with blood pressure control
- BLifelong dual antiplatelet therapy without surgical intervention
- CRepeat carotid ultrasonography in 6 months before deciding
- DCarotid endarterectomy within 2 weeks of symptom onset
- ECarotid artery stenting only if stenosis progresses to 90%
Show answer
For symptomatic carotid stenosis of 70 to 99% in a patient who has had a transient ischemic attack or non-disabling stroke, carotid endarterectomy performed within 2 weeks of the symptomatic event provides the greatest reduction in subsequent stroke risk. The benefit of surgery is time-sensitive, as the risk of recurrent stroke is highest in the days following the initial event. Medical therapy with antiplatelets and statins is continued perioperatively but does not replace surgical intervention at this degree of stenosis.
- A. Medical therapy alone is inadequate for symptomatic stenosis in this range; it is an adjunct to, not a substitute for, endarterectomy.
- B. Dual antiplatelet therapy alone is insufficient; surgical revascularization is indicated for this degree of symptomatic stenosis.
- C. Delaying for repeat imaging wastes the time-sensitive window during which endarterectomy provides maximal benefit.
- E. Endarterectomy is indicated now based on symptomatic 70-99% stenosis; waiting for progression to 90% delays a proven benefit.
A 24-year-old man undergoes closed reduction of a tibial shaft fracture after a motor vehicle collision. Twelve hours later, he reports severe, worsening pain in the leg that is not relieved by his scheduled opioid analgesia. On examination, passive dorsiflexion of the toes markedly increases his pain, the leg is tense and swollen, and he has decreased sensation in the first web space. Dorsalis pedis pulse is palpable and capillary refill is normal. What is the most appropriate next step?
- AReassure and increase opioid dose, then reassess in 6 hours
- BObtain an MRI of the leg to confirm the diagnosis
- CMeasure intracompartmental pressure before deciding on fasciotomy
- DObtain a lower limb venous Doppler ultrasound
- EImmediate fasciotomy based on clinical findings
Show answer
Acute compartment syndrome is a clinical diagnosis in a patient with classic findings: pain out of proportion to injury, pain with passive stretch, and sensory changes, and it should prompt emergency fasciotomy without delay for confirmatory testing. Pulses and capillary refill are often preserved until late, so their presence does not exclude the diagnosis. Intracompartmental pressure measurement is reserved for equivocal cases or uncooperative or obtunded patients where clinical assessment is unreliable. Delaying treatment risks irreversible muscle and nerve necrosis within hours.
- A. Increasing opioids masks symptoms and delays diagnosis, risking irreversible tissue damage.
- B. MRI is not used to diagnose acute compartment syndrome and would cause dangerous delay.
- C. Pressure measurement is useful when the clinical picture is unclear, but this patient has classic findings and should proceed directly to fasciotomy without delay.
- D. Venous Doppler evaluates for DVT, not compartment syndrome, and would waste critical time.
Orthopedic Trauma
7 questionsA 32-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motorcycle collision. He has an open fracture of the tibia with a 4 cm wound, moderate soft tissue contamination, and exposed bone, without evidence of vascular injury. His vital signs are stable. What is the most appropriate immediate management?
- AOral amoxicillin-clavulanate and elective debridement within 72 hours
- BIntravenous vancomycin alone with debridement delayed until swelling resolves
- CIntravenous cefazolin and urgent surgical debridement within 24 hours
- DWound irrigation with saline only, without antibiotics, pending culture results
- EIntravenous ciprofloxacin and debridement delayed until orthopedic surgeon availability within 5 days
Show answer
Open fractures require prompt intravenous antibiotics, typically a first-generation cephalosporin such as cefazolin, administered as soon as possible after injury to reduce infection risk, along with surgical debridement and irrigation, ideally within 24 hours of injury. Antibiotic coverage is broadened to include gram-negative organisms in more severely contaminated or high-energy injuries. Delaying debridement beyond this window increases the risk of infection and osteomyelitis. Oral antibiotics and saline irrigation alone are inadequate for an open fracture with contamination.
- A. Oral antibiotics provide inadequate coverage, and delaying debridement to 72 hours increases infection risk.
- B. Vancomycin alone does not cover gram-negative organisms typically relevant in contaminated open fractures, and delaying debridement is inappropriate.
- D. Antibiotics should not be withheld; delaying treatment pending cultures significantly increases infection risk.
- E. A 5-day delay for debridement is unacceptable and substantially increases the risk of deep infection and osteomyelitis.
An 82-year-old woman living independently falls at home and presents with right hip pain and inability to bear weight. X-ray confirms a displaced intertrochanteric femur fracture. She has well-controlled hypertension and takes no anticoagulants. Her vital signs and basic laboratory investigations are within normal limits. What is the most appropriate timing for surgical fixation to reduce mortality risk?
- AWithin 48 hours of admission
- BElective surgery scheduled 2 weeks later as an outpatient
- CDelayed until all comorbidities are fully investigated, regardless of duration
- DNon-operative management with traction and early mobilization
- EWithin 7 days, once medical optimization is complete
Show answer
Surgical fixation of hip fractures within 48 hours of admission is associated with reduced 30-day mortality, fewer complications such as pressure ulcers and pneumonia, and improved functional outcomes in elderly patients. Unnecessary delay for extensive workup in a medically stable patient increases the risk of immobility-related complications without clear benefit. Non-operative management is reserved for patients who are not surgical candidates due to prohibitive risk or limited life expectancy, and carries significant morbidity from prolonged immobility.
- B. Elective delay of 2 weeks significantly increases mortality and complication risk compared with early fixation.
- C. Extensive delay for investigation in a stable patient increases complications without proven benefit and is not guideline-recommended.
- D. Non-operative management carries high morbidity and mortality from prolonged immobility and is reserved for patients unfit for any surgery.
- E. Waiting up to 7 days is associated with higher mortality compared with fixation within 48 hours in a medically stable patient.
A 24-year-old man falls onto an outstretched hand while playing hockey. He has tenderness in the anatomical snuffbox and pain on axial compression of the thumb. Wrist radiographs including scaphoid views show no fracture line. What is the most appropriate next step?
- AApply a thumb spica cast and repeat radiographs in 10-14 days
- BOrder a bone scan immediately
- CObtain an MRI of the wrist within 24 hours
- DReassure the patient and discharge with as-needed analgesia
- ERefer for immediate surgical fixation
Show answer
Scaphoid fractures are notoriously difficult to detect on initial radiographs because the fracture line can be occult for up to two weeks. Given the high risk of avascular necrosis and nonunion from missed fractures (due to retrograde blood supply), the standard approach is to immobilize clinically suspected fractures in a thumb spica cast and repeat radiographs in 10-14 days, when bone resorption at the fracture site makes it visible. MRI or CT can detect occult fractures sooner but are not universally available as first-line in all Canadian settings, making cast immobilization with repeat imaging the practical and guideline-supported approach. Early immobilization also prevents further displacement while awaiting definitive imaging.
- B. Bone scan is not the standard initial approach and has largely been replaced by MRI/CT where occult fracture is strongly suspected.
- C. MRI is sensitive and can be used but is not required immediately in most centres; cast and repeat X-ray is the accepted first-line approach.
- D. Discharging without immobilization risks missing a fracture and progression to nonunion or avascular necrosis.
- E. Surgery is not indicated without a confirmed fracture.
A 19-year-old man sustains a closed femoral shaft fracture in a motor vehicle collision. Fixation is planned but delayed 36 hours due to other injuries. On day 2, he develops acute dyspnea and confusion. Temperature is 38.2°C, heart rate 128/min, respiratory rate 32/min, and oxygen saturation 84% on room air. Petechiae are noted on his chest and axillae. Chest X-ray shows diffuse bilateral infiltrates. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- AAcute respiratory distress syndrome from sepsis
- BPulmonary thromboembolism
- CFat embolism syndrome
- DAspiration pneumonia
- ECardiac tamponade
Show answer
Fat embolism syndrome classically occurs 24-72 hours after long bone or pelvic fractures and presents with the triad of hypoxemic respiratory distress, neurologic changes (confusion, agitation), and a petechial rash typically on the chest, axillae, and conjunctivae. Marrow fat released into the venous circulation at the fracture site embolizes to the pulmonary capillaries and causes a local inflammatory response and microvascular occlusion. Management is supportive, with early fracture fixation reducing the risk. The time course, petechiae, and neurologic involvement distinguish this from pulmonary embolism, which usually lacks petechiae and fever of this degree.
- A. ARDS from sepsis is possible but does not explain the characteristic petechiae and the classic 24-72 hour post-fracture timing.
- B. Pulmonary embolism typically presents with pleuritic chest pain and lacks the petechial rash and fever seen here.
- D. Aspiration pneumonia would not explain the petechial rash or the temporal relationship to the fracture.
- E. Cardiac tamponade presents with hypotension, jugular venous distension, and muffled heart sounds, not diffuse infiltrates and petechiae.
A 5-year-old boy presents with a 2-day history of right hip pain and refusal to walk. He has a low-grade fever. Temperature is 38.6°C, heart rate 110/min. He holds the hip flexed, abducted, and externally rotated, with pain on passive range of motion. He is unable to bear weight on the right leg. Laboratory results show white blood cell count 13.5 x 10^9/L, erythrocyte sedimentation rate 45 mm/h, and C-reactive protein 42 mg/L. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- ALegg-Calve-Perthes disease
- BJuvenile idiopathic arthritis
- CTransient synovitis of the hip
- DOsteoid osteoma
- ESeptic arthritis of the hip
Show answer
The Kocher criteria for differentiating septic arthritis from transient synovitis include fever greater than 38.5°C, inability to bear weight, ESR greater than 40 mm/h, and WBC count greater than 12 x 10^9/L (with CRP greater than 20 mg/L added by Caird as a strong independent predictor). This child meets four of these criteria, giving a very high predicted probability of septic arthritis, which requires urgent hip aspiration and surgical drainage to prevent cartilage destruction and femoral head damage. Transient synovitis is a diagnosis of exclusion typically presenting with normal or mildly elevated inflammatory markers and low-grade or no fever.
- A. Legg-Calve-Perthes disease is a chronic, insidious process without fever or markedly elevated inflammatory markers.
- B. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis usually presents with a more chronic course and often polyarticular involvement, not an acute single joint presentation with this degree of inflammatory marker elevation.
- C. Transient synovitis typically presents with normal or only mildly elevated inflammatory markers and lower fever, not this combination of findings.
- D. Osteoid osteoma causes night pain relieved by NSAIDs and does not cause fever or elevated inflammatory markers.
A 13-year-old boy presents with a 3-week history of worsening left groin and thigh pain and a limp. He has no history of trauma. His body mass index is 32 kg/m^2. On examination, he walks with the left foot externally rotated, and passive hip flexion causes the thigh to obligately rotate into external rotation and abduction. Internal rotation of the hip is markedly limited compared to the right side. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- AOsteomyelitis of the proximal femur
- BTransient synovitis
- CLegg-Calve-Perthes disease
- DDevelopmental dysplasia of the hip
- ESlipped capital femoral epiphysis
Show answer
Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) classically occurs in obese adolescents during the growth spurt, presenting with insidious groin, thigh, or knee pain and a limp. The hallmark finding is obligate external rotation of the hip during passive flexion, with loss of internal rotation, due to posterior and inferior displacement of the femoral epiphysis relative to the femoral neck. Diagnosis is confirmed with anteroposterior and frog-leg lateral radiographs of the pelvis, and treatment involves prompt surgical pinning to prevent further slippage and avascular necrosis. Weight-bearing should be stopped immediately once suspected to reduce the risk of progression to an unstable slip.
- A. Osteomyelitis would typically present with fever and systemic signs of infection, which are absent here.
- B. Transient synovitis is typically acute, often post-viral, and occurs in younger children, not adolescents with this chronic presentation.
- C. Legg-Calve-Perthes disease occurs in younger children (typically 4-10 years) and does not show the same obligate external rotation pattern.
- D. Developmental dysplasia of the hip is diagnosed in infancy and would not present as new-onset pain in a 13-year-old.
A 6-year-old girl falls from monkey bars and sustains an extension-type supracondylar fracture of the humerus. After closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, she is unable to make an "OK" sign by pinching her thumb and index finger together, though sensation is intact. Radial pulse is palpable and capillary refill is less than 2 seconds. Which nerve is most likely injured?
- AUlnar nerve
- BAxillary nerve
- CRadial nerve
- DMusculocutaneous nerve
- EAnterior interosseous nerve
Show answer
The anterior interosseous nerve is a purely motor branch of the median nerve that innervates the flexor pollicis longus and the flexor digitorum profundus to the index finger, both required to form the "OK" sign (pincer grip between thumb and index finger). It is the most commonly injured nerve in extension-type supracondylar fractures. Because it carries no sensory fibers, sensation remains intact, which is a key distinguishing feature from other nerve injuries in this fracture. Most anterior interosseous nerve palsies are neurapraxias that resolve spontaneously with observation over weeks to months.
- A. Ulnar nerve injury would cause weakness of finger abduction/adduction and sensory loss over the little finger, not the OK sign.
- B. Axillary nerve injury affects shoulder abduction and is not associated with supracondylar fractures.
- C. Radial nerve injury would cause wrist drop and inability to extend the fingers and thumb, not isolated pincer weakness.
- D. Musculocutaneous nerve injury affects elbow flexion and forearm sensation, not thumb-index pinch.
Perioperative Care
6 questionsA 68-year-old man is scheduled for elective total knee arthroplasty. He has a history of well-controlled type 2 diabetes and hypertension. He reports being able to climb two flights of stairs without chest pain or dyspnea and walks his dog daily without limitation. He has no history of cardiac disease, and his physical examination is unremarkable. What is the most appropriate next step in preoperative cardiac assessment?
- AProceed to surgery without further cardiac testing
- BRefer for preoperative coronary angiography
- COrder a resting 12-lead electrocardiogram
- DOrder a dobutamine stress echocardiogram
- EOrder a transthoracic echocardiogram
Show answer
In a patient with good functional capacity, defined as being able to achieve at least 4 metabolic equivalents of task (such as climbing two flights of stairs or brisk walking) without cardiac symptoms, current Canadian Cardiovascular Society perioperative guidelines recommend proceeding to surgery without further cardiac testing, regardless of the type of noncardiac surgery. Functional capacity is a strong predictor of perioperative cardiac risk, and testing in asymptomatic patients with good functional capacity does not improve outcomes and only delays surgery. Further testing is reserved for patients with poor or unknown functional capacity combined with elevated clinical risk factors or significant surgery.
- B. Coronary angiography is invasive and unnecessary in an asymptomatic patient with good functional capacity.
- C. A resting ECG is not routinely required in asymptomatic patients with good functional capacity undergoing low-to-intermediate risk surgery.
- D. Stress testing is reserved for patients with poor functional capacity and elevated risk undergoing high-risk surgery, not this patient.
- E. Echocardiography is not indicated without symptoms or signs suggesting structural heart disease.
A 72-year-old woman is admitted for elective total hip arthroplasty. She has no history of bleeding disorder and normal renal function (creatinine 70 µmol/L). What is the most appropriate VTE prophylaxis strategy for this patient?
- AUnfractionated heparin 5000 units subcutaneously twice daily for 5 days
- BNo prophylaxis, early mobilization only
- CMechanical prophylaxis with compression stockings alone, no pharmacologic agent
- DAspirin 81 mg daily for 7 days only
- ELow-molecular-weight heparin for 10-14 days, extended up to 35 days
Show answer
Total hip arthroplasty is a high-risk category for venous thromboembolism, and current guidelines recommend pharmacologic prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (or alternatively a direct oral anticoagulant or aspirin after an initial LMWH course in some protocols) for a minimum of 10-14 days, with extension up to 35 days post-operatively given the prolonged risk period after major hip surgery. Mechanical prophylaxis alone is insufficient for this high-risk category and is typically used as an adjunct or when pharmacologic prophylaxis is contraindicated. Extended-duration prophylaxis reduces the incidence of symptomatic VTE, which can occur even after hospital discharge in hip arthroplasty patients.
- A. Unfractionated heparin twice daily and only 5 days duration is inadequate for this high-risk major orthopedic surgery.
- B. Omitting prophylaxis in high-risk major orthopedic surgery significantly increases VTE risk and is not guideline-supported.
- C. Mechanical prophylaxis alone is insufficient in this high VTE risk category without a contraindication to pharmacologic agents.
- D. Aspirin alone for only 7 days provides inadequate duration and is generally used as a step-down option after initial LMWH, not as sole initial prophylaxis.
A 58-year-old woman underwent an open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease. On postoperative day 1 her temperature is 38.4°C, heart rate 92/min, respiratory rate 20/min, and blood pressure 126/78 mmHg. The surgical wound looks clean and dry, chest auscultation reveals bilateral basal crackles that clear with coughing, and the calves are soft and non-tender. Urinalysis is unremarkable. What is the most likely cause of her fever?
- ASurgical site infection
- BDeep vein thrombosis
- CAtelectasis
- DClostridioides difficile colitis
- EUrinary tract infection
Show answer
Fever on postoperative day 1-2 is most commonly due to atelectasis from shallow breathing, splinting, and retained secretions after general anesthesia and abdominal surgery. Basal crackles that clear with coughing, without purulent sputum or focal consolidation, support this diagnosis rather than pneumonia or another infectious source. The classic timeline mnemonic places atelectasis in the first 1-2 days, urinary tract infection around days 3-5, wound infection days 5-7, and venous thromboembolism from day 5 onward. Management is incentive spirometry, early mobilization, and adequate analgesia rather than antibiotics.
- A. Surgical site infection usually appears after day 5 and the wound looks clean.
- B. DVT-related fever typically occurs from day 5 onward and the calves are non-tender.
- D. There is no diarrhea or recent antibiotic exposure to suggest C. difficile colitis.
- E. Urinary tract infection typically presents later (days 3-5) and urinalysis here is normal.
A 64-year-old man is on postoperative day 3 after an open right hemicolectomy. He has mild diffuse abdominal distension, has not passed flatus since surgery, and reports nausea without vomiting. Abdominal examination reveals a soft, non-tender abdomen with absent bowel sounds. An abdominal X-ray shows uniform gaseous distension of small and large bowel loops without a transition point, and gas is present in the rectum. What is the mechanism underlying his presentation?
- ALuminal obstruction from intussusception
- BMechanical obstruction from adhesions
- CMechanical obstruction from internal hernia
- DIntestinal ischemia from mesenteric thrombosis
- ETransient impairment of coordinated bowel motility
Show answer
Postoperative ileus is a self-limited, functional impairment of coordinated gastrointestinal motility caused by surgical handling, inflammatory mediators, opioid analgesia, and autonomic disruption, typically resolving within 2-4 days. It is distinguished from mechanical obstruction by diffuse gas distribution throughout the small and large bowel with gas present in the rectum, and the absence of a discrete transition point on imaging. Mechanical obstruction, in contrast, shows a transition zone between dilated proximal and collapsed distal bowel, often with absent rectal gas and crampy colicky pain. Management of ileus is supportive, including fluid and electrolyte correction, early mobilization, and minimizing opioids.
- A. Intussusception is rare in adults and would show a focal transition point, not diffuse gas with rectal gas present.
- B. Adhesive obstruction would show a focal transition point and typically presents later, not with uniform gas distribution.
- C. Internal hernia causes a focal mechanical transition point, not diffuse gas throughout the bowel.
- D. Mesenteric ischemia presents with severe pain out of proportion to exam and signs of peritonism, not diffuse painless distension.
A 52-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes mellitus is scheduled for an elective open ventral hernia repair. Her preoperative glucose is 9.8 mmol/L and her HbA1c is 7.4%. The surgical team plans prophylactic cefazolin and intraoperative measures to reduce surgical site infection. Which combination of measures is most appropriate?
- AGive cefazolin within 60 minutes before incision, maintain intraoperative normothermia, and withhold insulin until glucose exceeds 14 mmol/L
- BGive cefazolin within 60 minutes before incision, maintain intraoperative normothermia, and keep perioperative glucose below 10 mmol/L
- CGive cefazolin within 60 minutes before incision, allow mild intraoperative hypothermia, and keep perioperative glucose below 10 mmol/L
- DGive cefazolin 3 hours before incision, maintain intraoperative normothermia, and keep perioperative glucose below 10 mmol/L
- EGive cefazolin immediately after skin closure, maintain intraoperative normothermia, and keep perioperative glucose below 6 mmol/L
Show answer
Evidence-based surgical site infection bundles call for prophylactic antibiotics administered within 60 minutes before incision so that adequate tissue levels are present at the time of the first cut, maintenance of intraoperative normothermia (core temperature at least 36°C), and perioperative glucose control targeting below 10 mmol/L, avoiding both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Tight glucose targets below 6 mmol/L increase the risk of hypoglycemia without added benefit and are not recommended. Antibiotics given after incision or too far in advance fail to achieve adequate tissue concentration at the time of contamination.
- A. Withholding insulin until glucose exceeds 14 mmol/L allows prolonged hyperglycemia, which impairs neutrophil function and wound healing.
- C. Hypothermia impairs immune function and vasoconstricts tissue, increasing surgical site infection risk.
- D. Administering antibiotics 3 hours preoperatively results in subtherapeutic tissue levels by the time of incision.
- E. Antibiotics given after skin closure do not provide tissue coverage during the period of contamination risk and the glucose target is too tight, risking hypoglycemia.
A 45-year-old man is brought to the emergency department unconscious after a motor vehicle collision. He has a rigid, distended abdomen and a blood pressure of 78/48 mmHg despite two litres of crystalloid. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma shows free intraperitoneal fluid. No family members are present and no advance directive is available. The trauma surgeon determines that immediate laparotomy is required to prevent death. What is the most appropriate action regarding consent?
- ADelay surgery until a substitute decision-maker can be located and provide consent
- BProceed with emergency laparotomy under the doctrine of implied consent
- CObtain a court order authorizing surgery before proceeding
- DDelay surgery until the patient regains consciousness and can consent himself
- EProceed only after a second surgeon co-signs the consent form on the patient's behalf
Show answer
Canadian law recognizes the doctrine of implied (or presumed) consent in emergencies, allowing physicians to proceed with necessary treatment when a patient lacks capacity, no substitute decision-maker is immediately available, and delay would result in death or serious harm. This principle is codified in provincial health care consent legislation and reflects the ethical duty of beneficence outweighing the procedural requirement for explicit consent in true emergencies. The physician should document the clinical urgency, the patient's incapacity, and the absence of an available substitute decision-maker. Once the patient's condition allows, ongoing care decisions should involve the patient or an appropriate substitute decision-maker as soon as feasible.
- A. Delaying a life-saving intervention to locate a substitute decision-maker in a true emergency would cause preventable harm or death.
- C. Court orders are reserved for non-emergent disputed treatment decisions, not immediately life-threatening emergencies.
- D. The patient is unconscious and hemodynamically unstable; waiting for him to regain consciousness would be fatal.
- E. A second surgeon's signature does not substitute for legally valid consent and is not required under the emergency doctrine.
Surgical Oncology & Screening
3 questionsA 51-year-old asymptomatic man presents for a periodic health examination. He has no personal or family history of colorectal cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, or hereditary polyposis syndromes, and reports no rectal bleeding or weight loss. According to the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, what is the most appropriate recommendation regarding colorectal cancer screening for this patient?
- ANo screening is recommended until age 60
- BFecal occult blood testing or fecal immunochemical testing every 2 years starting at age 50
- CCT colonography every 5 years starting at age 50
- DFlexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 years starting at age 45
- EColonoscopy every 10 years starting at age 40
Show answer
The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care recommends screening average-risk adults aged 50 to 74 years with fecal occult blood testing or fecal immunochemical testing every 2 years, or flexible sigmoidoscopy every 10 years, as first-line strategies. Fecal testing is preferred for population-based screening because it is non-invasive, inexpensive, and has demonstrated mortality benefit in randomized trials. Colonoscopy is reserved as a follow-up investigation for positive screening tests or for higher-risk individuals, not as a first-line population screening tool in Canada. Screening should begin at age 50 in average-risk individuals, not earlier or later.
- A. Average-risk screening should begin at age 50, not be deferred to age 60.
- C. CT colonography is not a recommended first-line screening modality by the Canadian Task Force.
- D. Flexible sigmoidoscopy is recommended every 10 years, not every 5 years, and screening begins at age 50, not 45.
- E. Colonoscopy is not recommended as a first-line population screening test in Canada and age 40 is too early for an average-risk patient.
A 45-year-old woman with no personal or family history of breast cancer, no known BRCA mutation, and no prior chest irradiation asks her family physician whether she should begin routine mammography screening. According to the current Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care guideline for average-risk women, what is the most appropriate recommendation?
- ARecommend breast MRI annually starting now
- BBegin biennial mammography immediately with no further discussion needed
- CBegin annual mammography immediately
- DEngage in shared decision-making about the benefits and harms of starting biennial mammography before age 50
- EDefer any mammography discussion until age 50
Show answer
The Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care recommends that average-risk women aged 40 to 49 engage in shared decision-making with their physician, discussing the modest mortality benefit against the higher risk of false positives, overdiagnosis, and unnecessary biopsies before deciding whether to start screening earlier than age 50. For women aged 50 to 74, the Task Force recommends biennial mammography. Annual mammography is not recommended by the Task Force at any age for average-risk women, and MRI is reserved for women at high hereditary risk, such as BRCA mutation carriers.
- A. Breast MRI is reserved for women at high hereditary risk, not for average-risk screening.
- B. Starting screening without informed shared decision-making does not respect the patient's autonomy given the trade-offs involved at this age.
- C. Annual mammography is not the interval recommended by the Canadian Task Force at any age for average-risk women.
- E. Shared decision-making regarding earlier screening should occur now rather than deferring the conversation entirely to age 50.
A 38-year-old woman notices a painless lump in her neck. Examination reveals a firm, mobile 2 cm nodule in the right thyroid lobe that moves with swallowing, with no palpable cervical lymphadenopathy. She has no hoarseness, dysphagia, or family history of thyroid cancer. Thyroid-stimulating hormone is 1.8 mIU/L (normal). What is the most appropriate next investigation?
- ARadioactive iodine uptake scan
- BCore needle biopsy under ultrasound guidance
- CEmpiric levothyroxine trial with repeat examination in 3 months
- DThyroid ultrasound to assess sonographic risk features and guide fine-needle aspiration
- EFine-needle aspiration biopsy without prior imaging
Show answer
In a patient with a normal thyroid-stimulating hormone level, thyroid ultrasound is the recommended first investigation for a palpable thyroid nodule because it characterizes size, composition, and sonographic features such as microcalcifications, irregular margins, and increased central vascularity that predict malignancy risk and determine whether fine-needle aspiration is indicated based on size and risk stratification. A radioactive iodine uptake scan is reserved for patients with a suppressed thyroid-stimulating hormone to evaluate for a hyperfunctioning nodule, which is not the case here. Proceeding directly to biopsy without ultrasound risks missing nodules that need sampling from a specific suspicious area or performing unnecessary biopsy on a benign-appearing nodule.
- A. Radioactive iodine uptake scanning is indicated when the thyroid-stimulating hormone is suppressed, suggesting a hyperfunctioning nodule, not in this euthyroid patient.
- B. Core needle biopsy is not the standard first biopsy technique for thyroid nodules; ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration is preferred.
- C. Empiric levothyroxine suppression therapy has no proven benefit in shrinking thyroid nodules and delays appropriate risk stratification.
- E. Fine-needle aspiration should be guided by ultrasound risk stratification and nodule characteristics rather than performed blindly.
[Trauma Resuscitation]
1 questionsA 26-year-old woman was the restrained driver in a motor vehicle collision 36 hours ago. She was assessed in the emergency department at the time with a linear abrasion and ecchymosis across her lower abdomen; initial abdominal CT showed no solid organ injury and she was discharged. She now returns with diffuse abdominal pain, fever of 38.6°C, and a heart rate of 118 beats/min. Examination shows involuntary guarding and rebound tenderness over the lower abdomen. Which of the following is the most likely cause of her current presentation?
- ADelayed splenic rupture
- BAbdominal wall hematoma infection
- CRetroperitoneal hematoma expansion
- DTraumatic pancreatitis
- EPerforation of the small bowel
Show answer
A seatbelt sign (linear abdominal wall ecchymosis) is associated with underlying bowel and mesenteric injury, which can be missed on initial CT because free fluid or subtle wall thickening may be minimal early and perforation can be delayed. Mesenteric vessel injury or a contusion can progress to full-thickness necrosis and perforation over 24-48 hours, presenting with fever, tachycardia, and peritonitis as seen here. This is a classic pitfall of seatbelt sign patients, who require a period of observation or repeat imaging even when the initial CT is unremarkable. The clinical picture of delayed peritonitis after blunt trauma with a seatbelt sign should prompt urgent surgical evaluation for laparotomy.
- A. The spleen is a solid organ and injury would typically be visible on the initial CT; delayed rupture usually presents with hemorrhage, not fever and peritonitis.
- B. An infected abdominal wall hematoma would cause localized, not diffuse, tenderness and would not typically cause this degree of peritonitis.
- C. Retroperitoneal hematoma usually causes flank or back pain and hypotension from blood loss, not fever and peritonitis.
- D. Traumatic pancreatitis typically presents with epigastric pain and elevated amylase/lipase, not diffuse peritonitis from a lower abdominal seatbelt mechanism.
[Head & Spinal Trauma]
6 questionsA 19-year-old man is struck in the right temple by a baseball. He is dazed but able to walk off the field and talk normally with teammates. Forty minutes later, he becomes confused, vomits, and then loses consciousness. On arrival, his Glasgow Coma Scale is 8, his right pupil is dilated and sluggish, and his left arm shows decreased movement to pain. A non-contrast CT scan of the head is most likely to show which of the following findings?
- AA biconvex, lens-shaped hyperdense collection not crossing suture lines
- BA hyperdense collection within the basal cisterns
- CMultiple small hyperdensities at the grey-white matter junction
- DDiffuse loss of grey-white differentiation with sulcal effacement
- EA crescent-shaped hyperdense collection crossing suture lines
Show answer
This patient's history of a brief lucid interval after head trauma followed by rapid neurologic deterioration, with a dilated pupil and contralateral hemiparesis, is classic for an epidural hematoma, most often caused by laceration of the middle meningeal artery associated with a temporal bone fracture. Blood accumulates between the dura and the skull, and because the dura is tightly adherent to the sutures, the hematoma is confined and forms a biconvex (lens-shaped) hyperdensity on CT that does not cross suture lines. The dilated, sluggish pupil reflects uncinate herniation compressing the ipsilateral oculomotor nerve, a neurosurgical emergency requiring urgent evacuation. Rapid recognition and surgical decompression are critical to prevent fatal brainstem compression.
- B. Blood in the basal cisterns suggests subarachnoid hemorrhage, which does not typically present with this lucid interval pattern.
- C. Punctate grey-white junction hyperdensities suggest diffuse axonal injury, which presents with immediate loss of consciousness rather than a lucid interval.
- D. Diffuse grey-white loss of differentiation describes diffuse cerebral edema or hypoxic-ischemic injury, not a focal mass lesion.
- E. A crescent-shaped collection crossing suture lines describes a subdural hematoma, which is less classically associated with a lucid interval.
An 82-year-old man on warfarin for atrial fibrillation falls at home and strikes his head. He is brought to the emergency department one hour later, drowsy but opening his eyes to voice, with a Glasgow Coma Scale of 12. His INR is 3.4. A non-contrast CT scan of the head shows a crescent-shaped hyperdense collection over the right cerebral convexity with 8 mm of midline shift. Which of the following is the most appropriate immediate management?
- AWithhold reversal agents and observe with serial neurologic examinations
- BAdminister protamine sulfate and arrange outpatient neurosurgery follow-up
- CAdminister platelet transfusion and admit to a general medical ward
- DAdminister 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate and vitamin K, then obtain urgent neurosurgical evaluation
- EAdminister fresh frozen plasma only and repeat CT in 6 hours
Show answer
This patient has a symptomatic acute subdural hematoma with significant midline shift in the setting of supratherapeutic warfarin anticoagulation, a situation with high risk of hematoma expansion and herniation. Current guidelines recommend immediate reversal of warfarin with 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate, which rapidly restores clotting factors, combined with intravenous vitamin K for sustained reversal, and urgent neurosurgical consultation for possible evacuation. Fresh frozen plasma is slower to prepare and administer and less effective than PCC for rapid reversal in life-threatening bleeding. Time to anticoagulation reversal is directly linked to outcome in anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage, so delay must be avoided.
- A. Withholding reversal risks hematoma expansion and herniation; urgent reversal and neurosurgical input are required.
- B. Protamine reverses heparin, not warfarin, and is not appropriate here; outpatient follow-up is unsafe with midline shift.
- C. Platelets do not reverse warfarin's effect on vitamin K-dependent clotting factors, and a general ward is inappropriate for this acuity.
- E. FFP alone is slower acting and less effective than PCC for rapid warfarin reversal in this emergency.
A 24-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motorcycle collision. He is awake and oriented. Examination reveals bilateral periorbital ecchymosis without direct trauma to the orbits, bruising over the mastoid process bilaterally, and clear fluid draining from the left nostril that forms a distinct outer ring when placed on a gauze pad. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- ANasal bone fracture
- BBasilar skull fracture
- COrbital blowout fracture
- DLe Fort II facial fracture
- EAnterior epistaxis
Show answer
Periorbital ecchymosis not explained by direct orbital trauma (raccoon eyes), postauricular ecchymosis (Battle sign), and clear rhinorrhea that separates into a central clot and a halo of clear fluid on gauze (the halo sign, suggesting cerebrospinal fluid mixed with blood) together indicate a basilar skull fracture, typically through the anterior or middle cranial fossa. These signs result from blood and CSF tracking along fascial planes from the fracture site. Basilar skull fracture requires CT imaging, often with non-contrast CT of the head and temporal bone, and these patients should avoid nasogastric tubes and nasal instrumentation until the fracture is excluded. Clinical recognition is important because the fracture itself may not always be visible on standard axial CT cuts.
- A. An isolated nasal bone fracture does not cause periorbital ecchymosis bilaterally, mastoid bruising, or CSF rhinorrhea.
- C. An orbital blowout fracture causes periorbital signs localized to the affected side and does not explain Battle sign or CSF leak.
- D. Le Fort II fracture involves the maxilla and nasal bones with malocclusion and facial mobility, not the triad described here.
- E. Anterior epistaxis produces frank blood, not the halo sign of CSF mixed with blood, and would not explain bruising at the mastoid.
A 45-year-old man presents to the emergency department after falling down two stairs and striking his head. He did not lose consciousness and has no amnesia for the event. His Glasgow Coma Scale is 15, and he has no vomiting, no seizure, and no visible skull deformity. He takes no anticoagulants. He reports a mild headache and asks whether he needs a CT scan. Which of the following findings would be the strongest indication for obtaining a CT scan of the head according to the Canadian CT Head Rule?
- ARetrograde amnesia of 20 minutes before the impact
- BAge of 45 years
- CA single episode of light-headedness without loss of consciousness
- DHeadache rated 3 out of 10 in severity
- ETwo episodes of vomiting after the injury
Show answer
The Canadian CT Head Rule identifies high-risk and medium-risk criteria for clinically important brain injury in patients with minor head injury and GCS 13-15. High-risk criteria, which predict need for neurosurgical intervention, include GCS less than 15 at 2 hours, suspected open or depressed skull fracture, signs of basilar skull fracture, two or more episodes of vomiting, and age 65 years or older. Two or more vomiting episodes is one of the high-risk criteria and mandates CT imaging. Mild headache, brief light-headedness, and age under 65 are not criteria in this rule, and retrograde amnesia duration beyond 30 minutes falls under a lower-risk (medium-risk) criterion, not the 20 minutes described.
- A. Retrograde amnesia must be 30 minutes or more before impact to meet the medium-risk criterion; 20 minutes does not qualify.
- B. Age 65 years or older is the threshold criterion; 45 years does not meet it.
- C. A single episode of light-headedness without loss of consciousness is not one of the rule's criteria.
- D. Mild headache severity alone is not a criterion in the Canadian CT Head Rule.
A 16-year-old boy is in the intensive care unit following a severe traumatic brain injury from a fall. Over the past 20 minutes, his blood pressure has risen from 118/76 mmHg to 168/94 mmHg, his heart rate has fallen from 92 to 48 beats/min, and his respiratory pattern has become irregular with alternating deep and shallow breaths. Which of the following is the most likely explanation for this change?
- ADeveloping hypovolemic shock from occult hemorrhage
- BAcute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock
- CRising intracranial pressure causing brainstem compression
- DAutonomic dysreflexia from a thoracic spinal cord lesion
- EOpioid-induced respiratory depression from analgesia
Show answer
The combination of widening pulse pressure (rising systolic with stable or falling diastolic pressure), bradycardia, and an irregular respiratory pattern constitutes Cushing's triad, a late and ominous sign of markedly elevated intracranial pressure causing brainstem compression. As intracranial pressure rises toward mean arterial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure falls, triggering a reflex increase in systemic blood pressure (the Cushing reflex) to maintain cerebral perfusion; this hypertension in turn stimulates baroreceptors, producing reflex bradycardia, while brainstem compression disrupts the medullary respiratory centers. This is a medical emergency requiring immediate measures to reduce intracranial pressure and neurosurgical evaluation, as herniation may be imminent. Hypovolemic shock would cause tachycardia and hypotension, the opposite of this pattern.
- A. Hypovolemic shock classically produces tachycardia and hypotension, not bradycardia and hypertension.
- B. An acute MI would not typically produce this specific triad of hypertension, bradycardia, and irregular respirations in this trauma context.
- D. Autonomic dysreflexia occurs with spinal cord lesions above T6 and classically causes hypertension with bradycardia but would not explain an irregular brainstem-type respiratory pattern in a patient with a head injury, not a cord lesion.
- E. Opioid-induced respiratory depression causes slow, shallow breathing but does not explain the hypertension and bradycardia seen here.
A 71-year-old man with long-standing cervical spondylosis trips and falls forward, striking his chin on a table, causing his neck to hyperextend. He is brought to the emergency department reporting weakness that is greater in his hands and arms than in his legs. Examination shows reduced pain and temperature sensation in a cape-like distribution over the shoulders and arms, with relatively preserved position and vibration sense. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- ABrown-Séquard syndrome
- BAnterior cord syndrome
- CPosterior cord syndrome
- DComplete cord transection
- ECentral cord syndrome
Show answer
Central cord syndrome typically occurs in older adults with pre-existing cervical spondylosis after a hyperextension injury, which causes buckling of the ligamentum flavum and cord compression centrally. The cervical spinal tracts are organized somatotopically with cervical (arm) fibers located more centrally and lumbosacral (leg) fibers more peripherally in the corticospinal and spinothalamic tracts, so central injury produces motor weakness and pain/temperature loss that is disproportionately greater in the upper limbs than the lower limbs. Position and vibration sense, carried in the dorsal columns, are often relatively preserved. Most patients have a favorable prognosis for partial recovery with conservative management, though significant deficits can persist.
- A. Brown-Séquard syndrome results from hemisection of the cord, causing ipsilateral motor and dorsal column loss with contralateral pain/temperature loss, not the bilateral arm-predominant pattern described.
- B. Anterior cord syndrome causes bilateral motor loss and loss of pain/temperature sensation with preserved dorsal column function, but affects the legs and arms more equally and is typically caused by anterior spinal artery infarction, not hyperextension in spondylosis.
- C. Posterior cord syndrome is rare and causes loss of proprioception and vibration sense with preserved motor and pain/temperature function, the opposite of this presentation.
- D. Complete cord transection causes total loss of motor and sensory function below the lesion, not this selective arm-predominant pattern.
Frequently asked questions
Are these real MCCQE Part I questions?
No. They are original practice questions written in the style of MCCQE Part I for its content outline. Real exam items are confidential. Every question here was solved blind by a second, independent model and removed if the key was disputed.
How should I use these surgery & emergency care questions?
Do the quiz first without looking at the answers, then read the explanation for every question you missed or guessed. The educational objective under each answer is the fact to remember.
Are the questions free?
Yes. All questions, answers and explanations on this page are free and need no account.
More MCCQE Part I topics
Other exams
MCCQE Part I is administered by Medical Council of Canada. WhiteCoat Pro is not affiliated with or endorsed by them. All questions are original practice items written by the WhiteCoat Pro editorial team with AI assistance and checked by a second, independent AI model that solves every question blind; items with a disputed key are removed. They are not real exam questions. Educational use only, not medical advice.