Respiratory infections
8 questionsA 45-year-old woman with no significant medical history presents to her general practitioner with a 3-day history of fever, cough productive of yellow sputum and right-sided chest pain. She is alert, with temperature 37.8°C, heart rate 92/min, respiratory rate 20/min, blood pressure 118/76 mmHg and oxygen saturation 97% on room air. Chest X-ray confirms a right lower lobe consolidation. She has no penicillin allergy and is assessed as suitable for community management. According to Therapeutic Guidelines, which of the following is the most appropriate empirical antibiotic?
- AOral amoxicillin
- BOral cefalexin
- COral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
- DOral ciprofloxacin
- EOral doxycycline
Show answer
For low-severity community-acquired pneumonia managed in the community without comorbidities or penicillin allergy, Therapeutic Guidelines recommend amoxicillin as first-line empirical therapy because Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most common causative organism and amoxicillin provides reliable coverage with a narrow spectrum. Doxycycline is reserved as an alternative for penicillin allergy or when atypical pathogens are suspected. Cefalexin has inferior pneumococcal activity compared with amoxicillin and is not preferred first line. Fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are not recommended due to resistance concerns, side-effect profile and lack of reliable pneumococcal coverage respectively.
- B. Cefalexin has less reliable activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae than amoxicillin and is not first-line for CAP.
- C. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole does not reliably cover Streptococcus pneumoniae and is not used for CAP.
- D. Fluoroquinolones are not recommended as first-line therapy for low-severity CAP due to resistance concerns and toxicity.
- E. Doxycycline is an alternative for penicillin-allergic patients or when atypical pathogens are suspected, not first line here.
A 19-year-old university student presents with a 6-day history of dry cough, headache and malaise. She reports several housemates have had similar symptoms. Temperature is 37.9°C, heart rate 88/min, respiratory rate 18/min and oxygen saturation 98% on room air. Examination reveals scattered fine crackles bilaterally but no focal consolidation. Chest X-ray shows bilateral patchy interstitial infiltrates, more extensive than the clinical findings would suggest. A faint erythematous rash is noted on her trunk. Which of the following is the most likely causative organism?
- ALegionella pneumophila
- BHaemophilus influenzae
- CStreptococcus pneumoniae
- DStaphylococcus aureus
- EMycoplasma pneumoniae
Show answer
The combination of young age, subacute dry cough, headache, extrapulmonary features such as rash, a clustered outbreak among close contacts, and chest X-ray changes disproportionate to clinical signs is classic for Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Mycoplasma commonly causes outbreaks in settings of close contact such as shared housing, schools or military barracks. Unlike typical bacterial pneumonia, it often presents with minimal auscultatory findings despite significant radiographic infiltrates. Streptococcus pneumoniae typically causes a more acute, lobar pneumonia with high fever and productive cough. Legionella is associated with exposure to contaminated water sources and a more severe, multisystem illness.
- A. Legionella typically follows exposure to contaminated water systems and causes a more severe illness with gastrointestinal and neurological features.
- B. Haemophilus influenzae typically affects patients with underlying lung disease and does not classically cause outbreaks with rash.
- C. Streptococcus pneumoniae typically causes an acute lobar pneumonia with high fever and productive cough, not this subacute pattern with rash.
- D. Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia typically follows influenza infection or occurs in intravenous drug users, with a more fulminant course.
A 78-year-old man with Parkinson's disease and known swallowing difficulties is brought to hospital after being found febrile and confused at his residential aged care facility. His carer reports he choked on food two days earlier during dinner. Temperature is 38.6°C, heart rate 104/min, respiratory rate 24/min, blood pressure 102/64 mmHg and oxygen saturation 90% on room air. Chest X-ray shows a right lower lobe infiltrate with an air-fluid level suggesting early cavitation. Which of the following is the most appropriate empirical antibiotic regimen?
- AIntravenous vancomycin alone
- BIntravenous amoxicillin-clavulanate
- CIntravenous benzylpenicillin alone
- DOral doxycycline
- EIntravenous ceftriaxone alone
Show answer
This patient has clinical and radiographic features of aspiration pneumonia with early lung abscess formation, reflecting dysphagia-related aspiration of oropharyngeal flora including anaerobes. Amoxicillin-clavulanate provides broad cover against streptococci, Haemophilus influenzae and oral anaerobes, making it appropriate first-line therapy per Therapeutic Guidelines for aspiration pneumonia with suspected anaerobic involvement. Benzylpenicillin alone and ceftriaxone alone lack reliable anaerobic coverage. Doxycycline alone is inadequate for a patient with hypoxaemia and systemic sepsis requiring intravenous therapy. Vancomycin targets Gram-positive organisms including MRSA but does not cover the anaerobic and Gram-negative organisms typically implicated in aspiration.
- A. Vancomycin covers Gram-positive organisms including MRSA but does not provide anaerobic or Gram-negative coverage needed here.
- C. Benzylpenicillin alone lacks reliable activity against anaerobes and Gram-negative organisms implicated in aspiration pneumonia.
- D. Oral doxycycline is inadequate monotherapy for a hypoxaemic, septic patient requiring intravenous treatment with anaerobic cover.
- E. Ceftriaxone alone has poor activity against anaerobic oral flora, which are important pathogens in aspiration pneumonia.
A 72-year-old woman with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease presents to her general practitioner 30 hours after onset of fever, myalgia, sore throat and dry cough during a confirmed local influenza A outbreak. Temperature is 38.4°C, heart rate 96/min, respiratory rate 20/min and oxygen saturation 95% on room air. She is not in respiratory distress and does not require hospital admission. Which of the following is the most appropriate management regarding antiviral therapy?
- ACommence intravenous zanamivir, as she has underlying chronic lung disease requiring parenteral therapy
- BCommence oral oseltamivir now, as she is within 48 hours of symptom onset and has a risk factor for complications
- CWithhold oseltamivir, as antiviral therapy is only beneficial if commenced within 12 hours of symptom onset
- DWithhold oseltamivir until respiratory virus PCR confirms influenza A, then commence if still within the treatment window
- EWithhold oseltamivir, as she does not require hospital admission and therefore does not qualify for treatment
Show answer
Oseltamivir is most effective when started within 48 hours of symptom onset, and this patient falls within that window at 30 hours. She has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a recognised risk factor for influenza complications, which makes antiviral treatment appropriate even though she does not require hospitalisation. Treatment decisions during a confirmed local outbreak can be made on clinical grounds without waiting for laboratory confirmation, since delaying therapy reduces its effectiveness. Parenteral zanamivir is reserved for specific circumstances such as severe illness or inability to tolerate oral or inhaled therapy, not routine outpatient management.
- A. Intravenous zanamivir is reserved for severe disease or inability to use oral or inhaled therapy, not routine community treatment.
- C. The effective treatment window for oseltamivir is within 48 hours of symptom onset, not 12 hours.
- D. Waiting for PCR confirmation during a confirmed outbreak delays treatment and reduces antiviral effectiveness; treatment should not be withheld.
- E. Hospital admission is not required for antiviral treatment; outpatients with risk factors for complications should also be treated.
A 34-year-old childcare worker presents with a 3-week history of paroxysmal coughing fits followed by an inspiratory whoop and occasional post-tussive vomiting. She reports the cough is worse at night and has caused her to vomit twice. She has no fever. Her last pertussis-containing vaccine was over 10 years ago. Examination is unremarkable between coughing episodes. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step?
- AArrange a chest X-ray to exclude pneumonia before considering further testing
- BCommence empirical amoxicillin and review in one week
- CReassure her that the cough will resolve spontaneously without further investigation
- DArrange sputum culture and Gram stain to identify the causative organism
- ENotify public health authorities and arrange nasopharyngeal PCR for Bordetella pertussis
Show answer
This presentation of a prolonged paroxysmal cough with whoop and post-tussive vomiting in an adult with waning vaccine immunity is characteristic of pertussis. Nasopharyngeal PCR is the preferred diagnostic test for Bordetella pertussis, particularly within the first 2 to 3 weeks of cough onset, and pertussis is a notifiable disease in Australia requiring prompt reporting to public health authorities to enable contact tracing and outbreak control, especially given her occupational exposure to young children. Chest X-ray is not required unless pneumonia is suspected clinically. Amoxicillin has no role, as pertussis requires macrolide therapy such as azithromycin, and sputum culture is not useful for this fastidious organism.
- A. There is no clinical indication of pneumonia; chest X-ray is not the appropriate next step for suspected pertussis.
- B. Amoxicillin does not treat pertussis; macrolides such as azithromycin are the appropriate antibiotic class if treatment is indicated.
- C. Pertussis is a notifiable condition requiring public health action, particularly given her occupational exposure to children; it should not be dismissed without investigation.
- D. Bordetella pertussis is fastidious and does not grow reliably on routine sputum culture; PCR is the preferred diagnostic method.
A 29-year-old otherwise healthy man presents to his general practitioner with a 4-day history of cough productive of clear sputum and mild chest discomfort following a recent upper respiratory tract infection. He denies fever, has no shortness of breath and feels generally well. Temperature is 36.9°C, heart rate 78/min, respiratory rate 16/min and oxygen saturation 99% on room air. Chest examination reveals scattered rhonchi but no crackles, dullness or bronchial breathing. Which of the following is the most appropriate management?
- AArrange sputum culture and commence antibiotics while awaiting results
- BPrescribe oral doxycycline for 7 days
- CArrange a chest X-ray before deciding on antibiotic therapy
- DPrescribe oral amoxicillin for 5 days
- EProvide symptomatic advice and reassurance without antibiotics
Show answer
This presentation is consistent with acute bronchitis, a usually self-limiting viral illness, given the absence of fever, normal vital signs, normal oxygen saturation and lack of focal chest signs such as crackles or dullness suggesting consolidation. Antibiotics do not improve outcomes in acute bronchitis in healthy adults and contribute to antimicrobial resistance, so Therapeutic Guidelines recommend symptomatic management and patient education about the expected duration of cough, which can last several weeks. A chest X-ray is unnecessary in the absence of features suggesting pneumonia, such as fever, tachypnoea or focal findings. Sputum culture is not useful in this self-limiting viral illness.
- A. Sputum culture has no role in the management of self-limiting acute bronchitis and should not guide antibiotic use here.
- B. Doxycycline is not indicated, as there is no clinical evidence of bacterial pneumonia requiring antibiotic therapy.
- C. Chest X-ray is unnecessary in the absence of fever, tachypnoea, hypoxaemia or focal chest signs suggesting pneumonia.
- D. Antibiotics are not indicated in acute bronchitis in an otherwise healthy adult without clinical features suggesting bacterial pneumonia.
A 55-year-old Aboriginal man attends his general practice for a routine health check. He has type 2 diabetes managed with metformin and has never received pneumococcal or influenza vaccination. He works as a truck driver and has no other significant medical history. According to the Australian Immunisation Handbook, which of the following best describes his vaccination needs?
- AHe should receive influenza vaccination annually but does not qualify for pneumococcal vaccination until age 65 years
- BHe should receive pneumococcal vaccination now but influenza vaccination is only recommended from age 65 years
- CHe does not require either vaccine until he turns 65 years, as he has no additional risk factors
- DHe should receive only a single dose of influenza vaccine now, with no ongoing annual requirement
- EHe should receive both annual influenza vaccination and pneumococcal vaccination now, as an Aboriginal person aged 50 years or over
Show answer
The Australian Immunisation Handbook recommends that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 50 years and over receive both pneumococcal vaccination and annual influenza vaccination, reflecting their increased risk of invasive pneumococcal disease and influenza-related complications compared with the general population, in whom these vaccines are generally recommended from age 65 years. His type 2 diabetes is an additional independent indication for both vaccines regardless of age or ethnicity, as it falls under the medical risk condition category in the Handbook. Influenza vaccination should be given annually due to waning immunity and antigenic drift, while pneumococcal vaccination follows a specific schedule rather than annual dosing.
- A. He qualifies for pneumococcal vaccination now, both due to his Aboriginal status at age 50 and over and his diabetes as a medical risk condition.
- B. Influenza vaccination is recommended annually for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 50 and over and for people with diabetes, not only from age 65.
- C. He qualifies for both vaccines now due to his Aboriginal status and his diabetes, independent of reaching age 65.
- D. Influenza vaccination should be given annually due to waning immunity and changing circulating strains, not as a single lifetime dose.
A 34-year-old man presents to a regional Queensland hospital with a 6-week history of productive cough, night sweats and 5 kg weight loss. He arrived in Australia from Papua New Guinea 3 months ago. Temperature is 37.8°C. Chest examination reveals faint crackles in the right upper zone. What is the most appropriate initial investigation?
- AInterferon-gamma release assay
- BSputum cytology for malignant cells
- CBronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage
- DChest X-ray and three sputum samples for acid-fast bacilli smear and culture
- ECT chest with contrast
Show answer
In a patient from a high-TB-burden country with classic symptoms (chronic cough, night sweats, weight loss) and upper zone findings, active pulmonary tuberculosis must be excluded first. Chest X-ray looking for upper lobe infiltrates, cavitation or fibronodular change, combined with at least three sputum samples for AFB smear and mycobacterial culture, is the standard initial work-up recommended by Therapeutic Guidelines. Culture also allows drug susceptibility testing, which is essential given rising rates of drug resistance in the Asia-Pacific region. IGRA and Mantoux testing are used for latent infection, not for diagnosing active disease.
- A. IGRA detects immune sensitisation to TB antigens and cannot distinguish active from latent infection; it is not the initial test for suspected active disease.
- B. Malignancy is less likely given the systemic symptoms, country of origin and clinical picture, which are classic for TB.
- C. Bronchoscopy is reserved for cases where sputum cannot be obtained or diagnosis remains uncertain after initial non-invasive testing.
- E. CT chest may be used later for further characterisation but is not the first-line investigation when active TB is suspected clinically.
Lung cancer and neoplasia
5 questionsA 62-year-old man, a current smoker with a 40 pack-year history, presents to his GP with a 3-week history of haemoptysis on two occasions and a persistent hoarse voice. He has no chest pain or fever. Examination is unremarkable apart from mild clubbing. What is the most appropriate next step?
- AInhaled corticosteroid trial for suspected cough variant asthma
- BReassurance and review in 6 weeks if symptoms do not resolve
- CReferral for spirometry to assess for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- DUrgent chest X-ray with referral for further assessment if abnormal or symptoms persist
- EEmpirical course of oral antibiotics for presumed bronchitis
Show answer
Haemoptysis combined with hoarseness (suggesting possible recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement) and digital clubbing in a heavy smoker over 60 years old are red flag features strongly suggestive of lung cancer. Australian guidelines recommend urgent chest X-ray as the initial investigation, with prompt referral to a respiratory physician or lung cancer service for further imaging and tissue diagnosis if the X-ray is abnormal or if clinical suspicion remains high despite a normal film. Delaying investigation with a watch-and-wait approach or symptomatic treatment risks a delayed cancer diagnosis and worse prognosis. Clubbing is a recognised paraneoplastic sign of lung malignancy, particularly non-small cell carcinoma.
- A. There is no wheeze or history suggesting asthma; this presentation requires exclusion of malignancy, not an empirical steroid trial.
- B. Watchful waiting is inappropriate given the combination of red flag symptoms and signs strongly suggesting malignancy; delay risks worse outcomes.
- C. Spirometry assesses airflow limitation but does not investigate the cause of haemoptysis, hoarseness or clubbing, and does not replace urgent imaging.
- E. There is no evidence of infection such as fever or purulent sputum; antibiotics would not address the underlying red flag symptoms and would delay diagnosis.
A 70-year-old man with a 50 pack-year smoking history presents with confusion, constipation and polyuria. Investigations reveal corrected calcium of 3.4 mmol/L, phosphate 0.7 mmol/L and a suppressed parathyroid hormone level. Chest X-ray shows a large cavitating mass in the right upper lobe. Biopsy confirms squamous cell carcinoma. What is the most likely mechanism underlying his hypercalcaemia?
- AVitamin D-mediated increase in intestinal calcium absorption
- BDirect osteolytic bone metastases from the primary tumour
- CTumour production of adrenocorticotropic hormone
- DEctopic secretion of antidiuretic hormone by tumour cells
- ETumour secretion of parathyroid hormone-related peptide
Show answer
Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung is classically associated with humoral hypercalcaemia of malignancy, caused by tumour secretion of parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP). PTHrP binds PTH receptors in bone and kidney, increasing bone resorption and renal calcium reabsorption, which explains the elevated calcium with an appropriately suppressed native PTH level due to negative feedback. This mechanism occurs independently of bone metastases and is one of the most common paraneoplastic syndromes seen in lung cancer. Symptoms of hypercalcaemia including confusion, constipation and polyuria reflect the effects of elevated calcium on the central nervous system, gut and kidneys.
- A. Vitamin D-mediated hypercalcaemia is more typical of lymphoma and granulomatous disease, not squamous cell lung carcinoma.
- B. Osteolytic metastases can cause hypercalcaemia but would typically show evidence of skeletal lesions and this mechanism is less common than humoral PTHrP-mediated hypercalcaemia in squamous cell carcinoma.
- C. Ectopic ACTH secretion causes Cushing syndrome, classically linked with small cell carcinoma, not hypercalcaemia.
- D. Ectopic ADH secretion causes SIADH with hyponatraemia, classically associated with small cell carcinoma, not hypercalcaemia.
A 64-year-old man presents to the emergency department with a 10-day history of facial swelling and shortness of breath on lying flat. He has a 45 pack-year smoking history. On examination there is marked swelling of the face and neck, distended veins over the upper chest wall that do not collapse with inspiration, and plethora of the face. Respiratory rate is 22/min, oxygen saturation 94% on room air. Chest X-ray shows a large right hilar mass with widening of the mediastinum. Which of the following is the most appropriate immediate management?
- AImmediate bronchoscopy with endobronchial biopsy
- BReassurance and review in one week with repeat chest X-ray
- COral prednisolone and outpatient respiratory physician referral
- DUrgent referral for mediastinal lymph node dissection
- EIntravenous dexamethasone and urgent CT chest with contrast
Show answer
Superior vena cava obstruction from an underlying mediastinal mass is an oncological emergency that requires prompt imaging to define the anatomy and guide definitive treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy or stenting), alongside corticosteroids to reduce peritumoural oedema and airway compromise while tissue diagnosis is being obtained. Contrast CT chest is the investigation of choice to delineate the level and extent of venous obstruction and plan intervention. Delaying treatment risks airway compromise, cerebral oedema and cardiovascular collapse. Tissue diagnosis (bronchoscopy or biopsy) is still required but follows stabilisation and imaging, not before it.
- A. Biopsy is needed for histology but not before stabilisation and imaging in a patient with impending airway/vascular compromise.
- B. This presentation represents a medical emergency; outpatient review risks life-threatening deterioration.
- C. Outpatient management is inappropriate given the risk of airway compromise and rapid progression.
- D. Surgical lymph node dissection is not an emergency intervention for SVC obstruction and is rarely indicated.
A 71-year-old former shipyard labourer presents with a 3-month history of progressive right-sided chest pain and exertional dyspnoea. He worked with asbestos-containing insulation materials from 1978 to 1985. Examination reveals dullness to percussion and reduced breath sounds at the right lung base. Chest X-ray shows a large right pleural effusion with nodular pleural thickening. Pleural fluid aspiration yields blood-stained fluid. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- ATuberculous pleural effusion
- BEmpyema secondary to bacterial pneumonia
- CBenign asbestos-related pleural plaques
- DPleural metastases from adenocarcinoma of unknown primary
- EMalignant pleural mesothelioma
Show answer
Malignant mesothelioma typically presents decades after asbestos exposure, with a latency period of 20 to 40 years, as seen in this patient exposed in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The combination of nodular pleural thickening, a large blood-stained effusion and chest pain in a patient with a clear occupational asbestos history is characteristic. Diagnosis requires pleural biopsy (often via thoracoscopy) with immunohistochemistry, as cytology alone has low sensitivity. Australia has one of the highest incidence rates of mesothelioma worldwide due to historical asbestos use in building and shipping industries.
- A. Tuberculous effusions are usually lymphocytic and straw-coloured, not blood-stained, and lack the occupational history correlation.
- B. Empyema presents with fever and purulent fluid, not blood-stained fluid, and there is no history of preceding pneumonia.
- C. Pleural plaques are usually asymptomatic incidental findings and do not cause effusion or nodular thickening with pain.
- D. Possible but less likely given the strong occupational exposure history and nodular pleural thickening pattern typical of mesothelioma.
A 58-year-old woman presents with a 2-month history of severe pain radiating down the inner aspect of her right arm to the little and ring fingers, associated with weakness of the right hand. She has a 30 pack-year smoking history. Examination reveals right-sided ptosis, miosis and absence of facial sweating, along with wasting of the small muscles of the right hand. Chest X-ray shows an apical opacity in the right upper lobe. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- ASubclavian artery aneurysm with thromboembolism
- BCervical disc herniation with C8 nerve root compression
- CPancoast tumour invading the brachial plexus and sympathetic chain
- DMetastatic breast carcinoma to the brachial plexus
- EThoracic outlet syndrome due to cervical rib
Show answer
A superior sulcus (Pancoast) tumour arises at the lung apex and characteristically invades local structures including the brachial plexus (C8-T1 roots, causing arm pain and hand muscle wasting in an ulnar distribution) and the sympathetic chain, producing Horner syndrome (ptosis, miosis, anhidrosis). The combination of apical chest X-ray opacity, arm pain in a C8-T1 distribution and Horner syndrome in a smoker is classic for this presentation. Diagnosis requires CT chest and tissue biopsy, with MRI to assess local invasion for staging. Most Pancoast tumours are non-small cell lung cancers, usually squamous cell or adenocarcinoma.
- A. Subclavian aneurysm does not typically cause this combination of findings and apical opacity.
- B. Disc herniation does not explain the apical lung opacity or Horner syndrome.
- D. Breast metastasis to the brachial plexus does not account for the apical lung opacity; the clinical picture fits a primary lung tumour.
- E. Thoracic outlet syndrome does not cause an apical mass on chest X-ray or Horner syndrome.
Interstitial lung disease
4 questionsA 68-year-old man presents with a 12-month history of progressive exertional dyspnoea and dry cough. He has never smoked and has no history of occupational dust exposure, connective tissue disease or medication use. Examination reveals fine bibasal end-inspiratory crackles and clubbing of the fingers. High-resolution CT of the chest shows bilateral subpleural and basal predominant reticulation with honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis, with no ground-glass opacities. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- ANonspecific interstitial pneumonia
- BHypersensitivity pneumonitis
- CSarcoidosis with pulmonary fibrosis
- DChronic eosinophilic pneumonia
- EIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Show answer
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis presents with progressive dyspnoea and dry cough in older patients, with fine bibasal crackles and finger clubbing on examination. The HRCT pattern of basal and subpleural predominant reticulation, honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis without significant ground-glass opacity is diagnostic of a usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern, which in the absence of an identifiable cause (connective tissue disease, drug, occupational exposure) confirms idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. This diagnosis can be made without lung biopsy when the HRCT pattern is classic. Early referral for antifibrotic therapy (pirfenidone or nintedanib) and lung transplant assessment is recommended.
- A. NSIP typically shows ground-glass opacities with lower lobe predominance and less honeycombing than seen in this classic UIP pattern.
- B. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis typically shows upper/mid-zone ground-glass change, mosaic attenuation and air trapping, and usually has an identifiable exposure history.
- C. Sarcoidosis-related fibrosis is usually upper lobe predominant with perilymphatic nodularity, unlike this basal subpleural pattern.
- D. Chronic eosinophilic pneumonia shows peripheral consolidation, not honeycombing and traction bronchiectasis.
A 54-year-old pigeon breeder presents with a 6-week history of progressive dyspnoea, dry cough, fevers and malaise, worst several hours after spending time in his aviary and improving when he is away from home over weekends. Examination reveals bilateral fine inspiratory crackles. High-resolution CT of the chest shows diffuse ground-glass opacities with poorly defined centrilobular nodules and areas of mosaic attenuation with air trapping. Which of the following is the most likely underlying mechanism of his lung disease?
- ADirect cytotoxic injury to alveolar epithelium from bird dander particulates
- BAutoimmune reaction with anti-citrullinated protein antibodies triggered by exposure
- CType III and type IV hypersensitivity reaction to inhaled avian protein antigens
- DChronic granulomatous reaction to non-caseating necrotising inflammation
- EIgE-mediated type I hypersensitivity reaction to inhaled bird feather allergens
Show answer
Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (bird fancier's lung in this case) results from repeated inhalation of organic antigens, provoking a combined type III (immune complex-mediated) and type IV (cell-mediated, delayed) hypersensitivity response in the lung parenchyma and small airways. Symptoms characteristically worsen with exposure and improve away from the trigger, as described here with symptoms worsening in the aviary and improving on weekends away from home. HRCT findings of ground-glass opacity, centrilobular nodules and mosaic attenuation with air trapping reflect bronchiolocentric inflammation. Management involves antigen avoidance, which is essential, and corticosteroids in more severe or persistent cases.
- A. HP is immune-mediated, not due to direct cytotoxic particulate injury.
- B. Anti-citrullinated protein antibodies are associated with rheumatoid arthritis-related lung disease, not hypersensitivity pneumonitis.
- D. Non-caseating granulomas with necrosis describes neither HP pathology (non-necrotising granulomas may occur, but this does not describe the core immune mechanism) nor fit the exposure-related pattern described.
- E. Type I hypersensitivity causes immediate IgE-mediated reactions such as asthma or anaphylaxis, not the delayed granulomatous lung injury seen here.
A 70-year-old man with atrial fibrillation has been taking a medication for the past 14 months for rhythm control. He presents with a 3-month history of progressive exertional dyspnoea and dry cough. Examination reveals fine bibasal crackles. Chest X-ray shows bilateral peripheral and upper zone predominant interstitial infiltrates. Thyroid function tests are normal and liver function tests show mildly elevated transaminases. Which of the following medications is the most likely cause of his lung disease?
- AWarfarin
- BDigoxin
- CAmiodarone
- DFlecainide
- EMetoprolol
Show answer
Amiodarone pulmonary toxicity is a well-recognised adverse effect that typically develops after months of therapy and presents with progressive dyspnoea, dry cough and bibasal or diffuse interstitial infiltrates on imaging, sometimes with an upper zone predominance. The drug accumulates in lung tissue due to its high lipophilicity and long half-life, causing direct cytotoxic injury and phospholipidosis in alveolar macrophages and type II pneumocytes. Concurrent hepatotoxicity and thyroid dysfunction are also recognised amiodarone adverse effects, making mild transaminase elevation consistent with this diagnosis. Management involves stopping amiodarone and considering corticosteroids in moderate to severe cases.
- A. Warfarin is not associated with pulmonary fibrosis.
- B. Digoxin does not cause interstitial lung disease.
- D. Flecainide is not a recognised cause of pulmonary fibrosis.
- E. Metoprolol is not associated with pulmonary fibrosis.
A 34-year-old woman presents with a 2-month history of dry cough and mild exertional dyspnoea. She also reports tender, erythematous nodules on both shins and bilateral ankle pain and swelling for the past 3 weeks. Examination reveals tender erythematous nodular lesions over the anterior shins and mild bilateral ankle joint swelling. Chest X-ray shows bilateral hilar and right paratracheal lymphadenopathy with clear lung fields. Serum calcium is 2.70 mmol/L (normal 2.15-2.60). Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- ASarcoidosis with Löfgren syndrome
- BRheumatoid arthritis with pulmonary nodules
- CHodgkin lymphoma with hypercalcaemia of malignancy
- DLymphoma with paraneoplastic skin manifestations
- ETuberculosis with reactive arthritis
Show answer
This presentation is classic for Löfgren syndrome, an acute presentation of sarcoidosis comprising bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy on chest X-ray, erythema nodosum and polyarthralgia (often ankle involvement), frequently with fever. This corresponds to Scadding stage I sarcoidosis (bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy without parenchymal infiltrate). Hypercalcaemia occurs in sarcoidosis due to increased extrarenal conversion of vitamin D to its active form by activated macrophages within granulomas. Löfgren syndrome has an excellent prognosis with a high rate of spontaneous remission, and treatment is usually symptomatic with NSAIDs rather than corticosteroids.
- B. Rheumatoid arthritis does not cause bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy or erythema nodosum as a presenting feature.
- C. Hodgkin lymphoma does not typically present with erythema nodosum and this symmetric hilar lymphadenopathy pattern; hypercalcaemia in malignancy is due to PTHrP or bone metastases, not vitamin D activation.
- D. Lymphadenopathy in lymphoma is usually asymmetric and progressive, not this acute symmetric bilateral hilar pattern with erythema nodosum.
- E. TB does not typically cause erythema nodosum and bilateral symmetric hilar lymphadenopathy with this acute triad; it usually causes unilateral lymphadenopathy with systemic symptoms and risk factors.
Pleural and chest wall disease
3 questionsA 24-year-old man is brought to the emergency department after a motorcycle crash. He is in severe respiratory distress. Blood pressure is 78/50 mmHg, heart rate 138/min, respiratory rate 34/min, and oxygen saturation 82% on 15 L/min oxygen via non-rebreather mask. The trachea is deviated to the left, the right hemithorax is hyperresonant to percussion, and breath sounds are absent on the right. Jugular veins are distended. What is the most appropriate immediate step?
- AInsert an intercostal catheter in the right 5th intercostal space, anterior to the mid-axillary line
- BGive intravenous fluid bolus and reassess
- CArrange urgent portable chest X-ray
- DInsert a large-bore cannula into the second intercostal space, midclavicular line, on the right
- EPerform arterial blood gas analysis
Show answer
This patient has clinical features of tension pneumothorax: hypotension, tracheal deviation away from the affected side, hyperresonance, absent breath sounds, and distended neck veins. Tension pneumothorax is a clinical diagnosis requiring immediate decompression and must not be delayed for imaging. Needle decompression with a large-bore cannula in the second intercostal space, midclavicular line, converts the tension pneumothorax to a simple pneumothorax and is life-saving. Definitive management with an intercostal catheter follows once the tension physiology is relieved.
- A. Formal intercostal catheter placement takes longer to set up than needle decompression and is the next step after decompression, not the first step.
- B. Fluid resuscitation does not address the underlying mechanical obstruction to venous return and ventilation.
- C. Imaging delays life-saving treatment in a clinically obvious tension pneumothorax.
- E. Blood gas analysis does not alter the immediate need for decompression and wastes critical time.
A 68-year-old woman presents with progressive dyspnoea and a dull ache in the right side of her chest. Serum protein is 68 g/L, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 180 U/L. Diagnostic thoracentesis yields fluid with protein 48 g/L and LDH 220 U/L. What is the most appropriate interpretation of these findings?
- ATransudate, as the pleural fluid LDH is less than 1000 U/L
- BExudate, as the pleural fluid LDH exceeds the upper limit of normal serum LDH
- CExudate, as the pleural fluid to serum protein ratio exceeds 0.5
- DTransudate, consistent with congestive cardiac failure
- EIndeterminate, repeat testing required after diuresis
Show answer
Light's criteria classify pleural fluid as an exudate if any one of the following is present: pleural fluid/serum protein ratio greater than 0.5, pleural fluid/serum LDH ratio greater than 0.6, or pleural fluid LDH greater than two-thirds the upper limit of normal serum LDH. Here, the protein ratio is 48/68 = 0.71, which exceeds 0.5, meeting criteria for exudate. The LDH ratio is 220/180 = 1.22, also exceeding 0.6, reinforcing the exudate classification. Exudative effusions point towards causes such as malignancy, infection, or pulmonary embolism rather than heart failure.
- A. An absolute LDH value below 1000 U/L is not part of Light's criteria; the relevant comparison is the pleural/serum LDH ratio.
- B. Light's criteria use the pleural/serum LDH ratio, not a comparison with the normal serum LDH range, as the primary rule.
- D. The protein and LDH ratios both meet exudate criteria, excluding a transudate from cardiac failure.
- E. The calculated ratios already satisfy exudate criteria, so diuresis and repeat sampling are unnecessary.
A 55-year-old man with a history of community-acquired pneumonia treated with oral amoxicillin five days ago re-presents with ongoing fever of 38.9°C, pleuritic right-sided chest pain and worsening dyspnoea. Chest X-ray shows a moderate right pleural effusion. Diagnostic pleural aspiration yields turbid yellow fluid with pH 7.05, glucose 1.8 mmol/L, and Gram stain showing Gram-positive cocci in chains. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AOral antibiotics and outpatient review in 48 hours
- BIntravenous antibiotics alone without drainage
- CRepeat diagnostic aspiration in 24 hours
- DIntercostal catheter drainage with intravenous antibiotics
- EOral corticosteroids to reduce pleural inflammation
Show answer
The low pH (less than 7.2), low glucose, turbid appearance, and positive Gram stain confirm empyema, which is complicated by bacterial invasion of the pleural space rather than simple parapneumonic effusion. Empyema requires prompt drainage via an intercostal catheter in addition to intravenous antibiotics, as antibiotics alone cannot adequately penetrate loculated infected fluid. Delayed or inadequate drainage increases the risk of pleural thickening, fibrothorax, and the need for surgical decortication. Therapeutic Guidelines recommend early chest tube drainage guided by fluid characteristics such as pH, glucose and microbiology.
- A. Oral antibiotics are inadequate for a confirmed empyema with worsening sepsis and require escalation to intravenous therapy and drainage.
- B. Antibiotics alone without drainage fail to address the infected pleural collection and risk progression to a fibrothorax.
- C. Repeat aspiration alone delays definitive drainage and risks further loculation of infected fluid.
- E. Corticosteroids have no established role in empyema and do not address the need for source control.
Pulmonary vascular disease
2 questionsA 58-year-old woman is admitted with acute dyspnoea and collapse. On examination, blood pressure is 82/54 mmHg despite a 1 litre crystalloid bolus, heart rate is 128/min, respiratory rate 32/min, and oxygen saturation is 88% on 10 L/min oxygen. CT pulmonary angiography confirms a large saddle pulmonary embolus with right ventricular dilatation. There is no history of recent surgery, stroke, or active bleeding. What is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AUrgent surgical embolectomy as first-line treatment
- BTherapeutic dose low molecular weight heparin alone
- CInferior vena cava filter insertion alone
- DSystemic thrombolysis with alteplase
- EOral rivaroxaban
Show answer
This patient has a massive (high-risk) pulmonary embolism, defined by sustained hypotension despite fluid resuscitation in the setting of confirmed PE with right ventricular strain. Systemic thrombolysis with a thrombolytic agent such as alteplase is indicated in this setting, as it rapidly reduces clot burden and right ventricular pressure, improving survival, and she has no absolute contraindications described. Anticoagulation alone does not act quickly enough to reverse the haemodynamic compromise caused by the large clot burden. Surgical or catheter-directed embolectomy is reserved for patients with contraindications to thrombolysis or when thrombolysis fails.
- A. Surgical embolectomy is reserved for patients with contraindications to thrombolysis or failed thrombolysis, not as first-line therapy.
- B. Heparin alone does not rapidly reduce clot burden and is insufficient in the presence of haemodynamic instability.
- C. An IVC filter alone prevents further embolisation but does not treat the existing large clot burden causing shock.
- E. Oral anticoagulants have delayed onset and are not appropriate in haemodynamically unstable PE.
A 70-year-old man with long-standing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease attends for review. He reports worsening exertional dyspnoea over six months, now limiting him to walking 50 metres. On examination, there is a loud pulmonary component of the second heart sound, a parasternal heave, elevated jugular venous pressure with prominent 'a' waves, and bilateral ankle oedema. Oxygen saturation is 90% on room air. Which finding would most strongly support a diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension secondary to his lung disease?
- AElevated jugular venous pressure with prominent 'a' waves alone
- BBilateral ankle oedema
- CA loud pulmonary component of the second heart sound with a palpable parasternal heave
- DBilateral fine inspiratory crackles at the lung bases
- EPeripheral oxygen saturation of 90% on room air
Show answer
A loud, palpable pulmonary second heart sound and a parasternal heave reflect increased right ventricular pressure and are the most specific clinical signs of pulmonary hypertension among the findings given. Right ventricular hypertrophy from chronic pressure overload produces the heave, while increased force of pulmonary valve closure produces the loud P2. Ankle oedema, raised jugular venous pressure, and hypoxaemia are features of right heart failure or the underlying lung disease but are less specific to pulmonary hypertension itself. Confirmation requires echocardiography estimating pulmonary artery pressure, with right heart catheterisation as the diagnostic gold standard.
- A. Raised jugular venous pressure alone reflects elevated right atrial pressure but is less specific than the cardiac examination findings of right ventricular pressure overload.
- B. Ankle oedema reflects right heart failure from any cause and is not specific to pulmonary hypertension.
- D. Fine inspiratory crackles reflect parenchymal lung disease, not pulmonary hypertension specifically.
- E. Hypoxaemia is common in chronic lung disease generally and is not specific for pulmonary hypertension.
Sleep disorders
3 questionsA 48-year-old truck driver presents for a routine health check. His wife reports loud snoring and witnessed episodes of breath-holding during sleep. He feels unrefreshed on waking and often falls asleep while watching television. His body mass index is 34 kg/m², neck circumference is 44 cm, and blood pressure is 148/92 mmHg. He denies daytime sleepiness while driving. Using the STOP-BANG screening tool, he scores 6 out of 8. What is the most appropriate next step?
- AReassure him that his symptoms are due to obesity alone and recommend weight loss
- BPrescribe a trial of modafinil for daytime fatigue
- CCommence continuous positive airway pressure therapy empirically without a sleep study
- DRefer for polysomnography (sleep study)
- EAdvise lifestyle modification only and review in 12 months
Show answer
A STOP-BANG score of 5 to 8 indicates high risk of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea, warranting objective testing. Polysomnography remains the gold standard investigation to confirm the diagnosis, determine severity using the apnoea-hypopnoea index, and guide management, including eligibility for continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Given his occupation as a truck driver, confirming and treating OSA is also important for road safety and fitness-to-drive assessment. Empirical treatment without a confirmed diagnosis is not appropriate, as it does not establish severity or guide monitoring.
- A. A high STOP-BANG score indicates a need for formal testing rather than attributing symptoms to obesity without objective confirmation.
- B. Stimulant medication does not address the underlying obstructive sleep apnoea and is not first-line management.
- C. CPAP should not be commenced empirically without a confirmed diagnosis and severity assessment from a sleep study.
- E. A high-risk screening score in a commercial driver warrants prompt objective testing rather than delayed review.
A 52-year-old truck driver presents with his wife's report of loud snoring and witnessed apnoeas. He scores 14/24 on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Overnight polysomnography shows an apnoea-hypopnoea index of 38 events per hour, with oxygen saturation nadir of 82%. His BMI is 34 kg/m2. He has no craniofacial abnormality. Which of the following is the most appropriate initial management?
- AUvulopalatopharyngoplasty
- BSupervised weight loss program alone
- CMandibular advancement splint
- DContinuous positive airway pressure therapy
- EPositional therapy with a lateral sleep device
Show answer
This patient has severe obstructive sleep apnoea (AHI greater than 30 events per hour) with significant daytime sleepiness and desaturation, and he holds a safety-critical occupation. CPAP is the first-line treatment for moderate to severe OSA because it most reliably normalises the AHI and reduces daytime sleepiness, which is essential for his fitness to drive. Mandibular advancement splints are reserved for mild to moderate OSA or for patients who cannot tolerate CPAP. Weight loss is recommended as an adjunct but takes months and will not rapidly address his current driving risk. Surgery is not first-line therapy.
- A. Upper airway surgery is not a first-line option and is reserved for select cases unresponsive to other measures.
- B. Weight loss is a useful adjunct but too slow to address his current severe OSA and occupational safety risk.
- C. Mandibular advancement splints are appropriate for mild-moderate OSA, not severe disease with marked desaturation.
- E. Positional therapy is only effective for positional OSA, not generalised severe disease with this AHI.
A 48-year-old interstate truck driver is newly diagnosed with severe obstructive sleep apnoea after polysomnography shows an apnoea-hypopnoea index of 42 events per hour. He reports falling asleep briefly at traffic lights twice in the past month. He holds a heavy vehicle licence. What is the most appropriate next step?
- ARefer for a formal driving simulator assessment before any restriction
- BRecommend he self-restrict to daytime driving only
- CAllow him to continue driving but review again in three months
- DCommence CPAP and permit unrestricted driving once started
- EAdvise him that he must not drive until symptoms are controlled, and report to the driver licensing authority
Show answer
Under the Austroads 'Assessing Fitness to Drive' standards, a commercial vehicle driver with severe OSA and symptomatic excessive sleepiness (such as episodes of falling asleep while stopped) is required to cease driving until the condition is effectively treated and stability is demonstrated. The treating doctor has a professional and often legal obligation to advise the patient not to drive and to notify the driver licensing authority, particularly for commercial licence holders where the standards are stricter. Simply reviewing later or trusting self-restriction does not meet the safety threshold given his reported sleep episodes. CPAP may later allow return to driving, but only after demonstrated compliance and symptom resolution confirmed by follow-up, not immediately upon starting therapy.
- A. A driving simulator assessment is not part of the standard pathway and delays the required immediate restriction.
- B. Self-restriction is not an accepted substitute for formal medical clearance in commercial driving standards.
- C. Continuing to drive unrestricted for three months is unsafe given his reported sleep episodes and commercial licence status.
- D. Return to driving requires demonstrated treatment compliance and symptom control, not simply starting CPAP.
Paediatric respiratory
5 questionsA 7-month-old infant presents with a 2-day history of coryza, cough and poor feeding. On examination, respiratory rate is 56 breaths per minute, there is mild subcostal recession, and widespread fine crackles with occasional wheeze are heard bilaterally. Oxygen saturation is 95% on room air. The infant is alert and feeding adequately at the breast, taking slightly less than usual. What is the most appropriate management?
- ASupportive care at home with safety-net advice
- BNebulised adrenaline and hospital observation
- CAdmit for intravenous antibiotics
- DChest X-ray and nebulised hypertonic saline
- ENebulised salbutamol and oral prednisolone
Show answer
This infant has clinical bronchiolitis with mild disease: saturations above 92%, mild work of breathing, and adequate oral intake. Therapeutic Guidelines recommend supportive care only, as bronchiolitis is a viral illness (usually RSV) with no proven benefit from bronchodilators, corticosteroids, antibiotics or hypertonic saline. Management centres on maintaining hydration, monitoring for deterioration, and clear safety-net advice for parents regarding increased work of breathing, reduced feeding or apnoeic episodes. Routine chest X-ray is not indicated as it does not change management in typical bronchiolitis and may lead to inappropriate antibiotic use.
- B. Nebulised adrenaline is used for croup, not bronchiolitis, and hospital observation is unnecessary for mild disease.
- C. Antibiotics are not indicated because bronchiolitis is viral and there is no evidence of bacterial superinfection.
- D. Chest X-ray and hypertonic saline are not indicated in typical mild bronchiolitis and do not alter management.
- E. Bronchodilators and corticosteroids have no proven benefit in bronchiolitis and are not recommended.
A 2-year-old boy presents to the emergency department with a barking cough and inspiratory stridor at rest, worsening over the previous 6 hours. He is alert, with mild intercostal recession, and stridor is audible without a stethoscope but settles somewhat when he is calm. Respiratory rate is 32 breaths per minute and oxygen saturation is 97% on room air. What is the most appropriate treatment?
- AOral dexamethasone 0.15 mg/kg as a single dose
- BNebulised adrenaline alone without corticosteroid
- CNebulised budesonide only, with no oral steroid
- DIntramuscular dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg repeated daily for 3 days
- EOral prednisolone 2 mg/kg daily for 5 days
Show answer
This child has moderate croup, with stridor at rest and recession but no cyanosis, severe distress or altered conscious state. Therapeutic Guidelines recommend a single dose of oral dexamethasone 0.15 mg/kg (or up to 0.6 mg/kg where only higher-strength formulations are available) for croup of this severity, as a single dose reduces symptom duration and hospital re-presentation without need for repeated dosing. Nebulised adrenaline is reserved for severe croup with marked distress or impending respiratory failure, used alongside steroids rather than instead of them. Prolonged courses of oral prednisolone are not standard for croup, which is a self-limiting viral illness typically requiring only a single steroid dose.
- B. Nebulised adrenaline is reserved for severe croup and should be combined with, not substituted for, corticosteroid treatment.
- C. Nebulised budesonide is an alternative when the oral route is not tolerated, but oral dexamethasone is preferred and a dose should still be given.
- D. Repeated daily dosing of dexamethasone is not required for croup, which typically resolves after a single dose.
- E. A 5-day course of prednisolone is unnecessary for croup, which responds to a single steroid dose.
A 4-year-old unvaccinated boy is brought to the emergency department with a 6-hour history of fever, sore throat and difficulty swallowing. He is sitting upright, leaning forward with his chin extended, drooling, and appears anxious. His voice is muffled. Temperature is 39.4°C, heart rate 140 beats per minute, and respiratory rate 28 breaths per minute with soft inspiratory stridor. What is the most appropriate next step?
- AKeep the child calm and arrange immediate anaesthetic and ENT assessment for airway management
- BInsert an intravenous cannula immediately for fluid resuscitation and antibiotics
- CExamine the oropharynx with a tongue depressor to assess the epiglottis
- DAdminister nebulised adrenaline and reassess in 30 minutes
- ERequest an urgent lateral neck X-ray to confirm the diagnosis
Show answer
This presentation, with drooling, tripod positioning, muffled voice and stridor in an unvaccinated child, is classic for acute epiglottitis, a life-threatening emergency caused by airway obstruction from a swollen epiglottis, most often due to Haemophilus influenzae type b. The priority is to avoid any intervention that may precipitate complete airway obstruction, including oropharyngeal examination, cannulation, X-rays or unnecessary handling. The child should be kept calm, ideally with a parent, while senior anaesthetic and ENT staff are urgently called to secure the airway under controlled conditions, usually in an operating theatre. Nebulised adrenaline is used for croup, not epiglottitis, and delaying airway management to trial it is unsafe.
- B. Attempting cannulation before securing the airway can distress the child and precipitate obstruction; airway takes priority.
- C. Oropharyngeal examination can precipitate complete airway obstruction and must be avoided in suspected epiglottitis.
- D. Nebulised adrenaline is not effective for epiglottitis, and delaying definitive airway management is dangerous.
- E. Neck X-ray delays definitive airway management and risks worsening obstruction if the child becomes distressed.
A 4-year-old girl with a diagnosis of asthma requires a salbutamol inhaler for symptom relief. She has never used an inhaler device before and finds it difficult to coordinate breathing manoeuvres. Which delivery device is most appropriate for her age?
- AMetered-dose inhaler used alone without a spacer
- BSoft mist inhaler used alone
- CDry powder inhaler used alone
- DMetered-dose inhaler with spacer and mask or mouthpiece
- EBreath-actuated inhaler without a spacer
Show answer
Young children typically cannot generate the inspiratory flow required for dry powder or breath-actuated devices, and cannot reliably coordinate actuation with inhalation for a metered-dose inhaler used alone. Therapeutic Guidelines and Australian asthma management guidelines recommend a pressurised metered-dose inhaler used with a spacer, with a facemask for younger children or a mouthpiece once they can seal their lips around it, as this ensures effective drug delivery regardless of coordination or inspiratory effort. Spacers also reduce oropharyngeal deposition and systemic absorption. Dry powder and breath-actuated devices are generally only suitable from around 6 to 8 years of age once adequate inspiratory flow is reliably achieved.
- A. A metered-dose inhaler without a spacer requires coordination that young children lack, leading to poor drug delivery.
- B. Soft mist inhalers used without a spacer require coordination that is unreliable in preschool-aged children.
- C. Dry powder inhalers require inspiratory flow that preschool children generally cannot generate reliably.
- E. Breath-actuated inhalers still require adequate inspiratory flow, which this age group cannot reliably produce.
A term newborn girl undergoes routine newborn screening on day 3 of life via heel-prick blood spot, which shows an elevated immunoreactive trypsinogen level. On further testing, two disease-causing CFTR gene variants are identified. At 6 weeks of age, she presents with failure to pass meconium in the first 48 hours after birth having required rectal washout, and now has poor weight gain despite adequate feeding, with frequent loose, greasy stools. What is the most appropriate next investigation to confirm the diagnosis?
- AFaecal elastase level
- BAbdominal ultrasound
- CSerum trypsinogen repeat level
- DStool microscopy for ova and parasites
- ESweat chloride test
Show answer
This infant's presentation, including an elevated immunoreactive trypsinogen on newborn screening, two CFTR variants, a history of meconium ileus, and failure to thrive with steatorrhoea from pancreatic insufficiency, is highly suggestive of cystic fibrosis. The sweat chloride test remains the diagnostic gold standard, with a chloride concentration of 60 mmol/L or greater on two occasions confirming the diagnosis in conjunction with the clinical picture and genetic findings. Faecal elastase is useful for assessing pancreatic exocrine function but does not establish the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis itself. Newborn screening with immunoreactive trypsinogen and genetic testing identifies infants at risk, but sweat chloride testing is required for definitive diagnostic confirmation.
- A. Faecal elastase assesses pancreatic exocrine function but is not the diagnostic test for cystic fibrosis.
- B. Abdominal ultrasound may show bowel changes from meconium ileus but does not confirm the underlying diagnosis.
- C. Repeating the trypsinogen level does not add diagnostic value once screening has already been positive with CFTR variants identified.
- D. Stool microscopy for parasites is irrelevant to this presentation and does not investigate the suspected diagnosis.
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander respiratory health
3 questionsA 3-year-old Aboriginal boy living in a remote Northern Territory community presents with a wet cough that has persisted for 10 weeks despite two courses of amoxicillin. His mother reports he has had several episodes of productive cough over the past year, each lasting more than 4 weeks. He is on the 25th percentile for weight. On auscultation there are coarse crackles at both lung bases that do not clear with coughing. Chest X-ray shows peribronchial thickening but no focal consolidation. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step?
- AArrange sweat chloride testing only and discharge if normal
- BPrescribe a six-week course of oral azithromycin without further investigation
- CRefer for high-resolution CT chest and respiratory paediatrician assessment for possible bronchiectasis
- DReassure the family that this is a normal pattern of recurrent viral bronchitis in young children
- ECommence inhaled corticosteroids for presumed asthma and review in 4 weeks
Show answer
Chronic wet cough lasting more than 4 weeks that fails to resolve with antibiotics is the hallmark of protracted bacterial bronchitis or early bronchiectasis, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in remote communities have a markedly higher incidence of bronchiectasis than other Australian children. Early referral for HRCT chest and specialist assessment is critical because early diagnosis and treatment can prevent progression to irreversible lung damage. Delayed recognition is a major contributor to the disproportionate burden of chronic lung disease seen in this population as adults. Sweat chloride testing may be part of the work-up but does not replace imaging and specialist referral. Empirical inhaled corticosteroids or prolonged antibiotics without a diagnosis risk missing the underlying structural lung disease.
- A. Sweat chloride testing alone is insufficient; it does not assess for bronchiectasis and should not replace imaging and referral.
- B. Antibiotics alone without imaging or specialist input will not identify or address underlying structural airway damage.
- D. Chronic wet cough beyond 4 weeks is not normal and warrants active investigation, especially in this high-risk population.
- E. There is no wheeze or evidence of reversible airway obstruction described, making asthma an unlikely primary diagnosis.
A 55-year-old Aboriginal man attends his Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Service for a routine health check. He has type 2 diabetes mellitus and no history of chronic kidney, lung or heart disease. He has never received a pneumococcal vaccine. According to the Australian Immunisation Handbook, which vaccination schedule is most appropriate for him?
- AA single dose of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine only, as for the general population at age 70
- B13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine only, with no polysaccharide vaccine required
- C13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine followed by 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine at least 2 months later, then a second 23-valent dose in 5 years
- D23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine now, with no further doses required
- EDeferral of pneumococcal vaccination until he turns 70 years, in line with the general population schedule
Show answer
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults have a substantially higher burden of invasive pneumococcal disease and are recommended to start pneumococcal vaccination from age 50, earlier than the general population schedule starting at 70. The recommended schedule for medical risk groups, which includes Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults aged 50 years and over, is 13-valent conjugate vaccine followed by 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine at least 2 months later, with a second dose of 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine given 5 years after the first. This conjugate-then-polysaccharide sequence improves immunogenicity compared with polysaccharide vaccine alone. Diabetes further adds to his risk, reinforcing the need for the full schedule rather than a single dose.
- A. This follows the general population schedule starting at 70 years, which does not apply given his higher risk and eligibility from age 50.
- B. Conjugate vaccine alone is insufficient; polysaccharide vaccine is also required to broaden serotype coverage.
- D. A single 23-valent dose alone, without prior conjugate vaccine and a booster at 5 years, does not meet the recommended schedule for this risk group.
- E. Waiting until age 70 ignores the recommendation to begin vaccination from age 50 in this higher-risk population.
An 8-year-old Aboriginal girl in a remote community presents with her third episode of sore throat and productive cough in 6 months. On examination her temperature is 37.8°C, heart rate is 110 beats/minute, and there is a soft systolic murmur at the apex not previously documented. She has coarse crackles at the right lung base. Chest X-ray shows right lower lobe consolidation. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in her management?
- ATreat the pneumonia with oral amoxicillin and review the murmur only if symptoms of heart failure develop
- BRefer for cardiac catheterisation prior to starting antibiotics for the chest infection
- CStart secondary prophylaxis with benzathine penicillin before confirming the diagnosis
- DArrange an echocardiogram to assess for rheumatic heart disease in addition to treating the chest infection
- EReassure the family that innocent murmurs are common in febrile children and no cardiac work-up is needed
Show answer
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children living in remote and rural areas have among the highest rates of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease in the world, and a new murmur in a child with recurrent respiratory tract infections should prompt echocardiographic assessment even while a concurrent chest infection is being treated. Echocardiography is the key investigation to confirm or exclude valvular involvement consistent with rheumatic heart disease. Treating the pneumonia is appropriate but must not delay cardiac assessment given the high background prevalence and the serious long-term consequences of missed rheumatic heart disease. Secondary prophylaxis should only begin once rheumatic fever or rheumatic heart disease is confirmed, and invasive cardiac catheterisation is not an appropriate initial investigation.
- A. Deferring cardiac assessment until heart failure develops risks missing early, treatable rheumatic heart disease.
- B. Cardiac catheterisation is invasive and not indicated as an initial investigation; echocardiography is the appropriate first test.
- C. Secondary prophylaxis should not be started until the diagnosis is confirmed by echocardiography and clinical criteria.
- E. Given the high regional prevalence of rheumatic heart disease, a new murmur in this context should not be dismissed as innocent without assessment.
Respiratory failure and critical care
3 questionsA 68-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is brought to the emergency department with increasing breathlessness over 3 days. He is drowsy but rousable. Respiratory rate is 12 breaths/minute, oxygen saturation is 88% on room air. Arterial blood gas on room air shows: pH 7.28, PaCO2 68 mmHg, PaO2 52 mmHg, bicarbonate 30 mmol/L. Which of the following best describes his acid–base and respiratory status?
- AType 1 respiratory failure with acute respiratory alkalosis
- BType 2 respiratory failure with primary metabolic acidosis
- CType 2 respiratory failure with acute-on-chronic respiratory acidosis
- DType 1 respiratory failure with compensated metabolic alkalosis
- ENormal gas exchange with chronic compensated respiratory acidosis
Show answer
Type 2 respiratory failure is defined by hypoxaemia (PaO2 below 60 mmHg) together with hypercapnia (PaCO2 above 45 mmHg), both of which are present here. The low pH of 7.28 confirms acute decompensation, while the elevated bicarbonate of 30 mmol/L reflects renal compensation for a degree of chronic hypercapnia, indicating an acute-on-chronic respiratory acidosis typical of an infective COPD exacerbation. If this were purely chronic and compensated, the pH would be closer to normal despite the elevated CO2. Type 1 respiratory failure refers to hypoxaemia with a normal or low PaCO2, which does not apply here given the markedly elevated PaCO2.
- A. PaCO2 is markedly elevated, not low, so this is type 2 not type 1 failure, and the pH is acidotic not alkalotic.
- B. The primary disturbance is respiratory, driven by CO2 retention, not a primary metabolic acidosis.
- D. Type 1 failure requires a normal or low PaCO2; here the PaCO2 is elevated, and the primary disturbance is acidosis, not alkalosis.
- E. The abnormal pH indicates the compensation is incomplete; gas exchange is clearly abnormal given the hypoxaemia and hypercapnia.
A 74-year-old woman with known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease presents with worsening dyspnoea over 2 days. She is alert and able to protect her airway. Respiratory rate is 28 breaths/minute, blood pressure is 128/78 mmHg, and oxygen saturation is 90% on 28% oxygen via Venturi mask. Arterial blood gas shows pH 7.29, PaCO2 72 mmHg, PaO2 58 mmHg, bicarbonate 32 mmol/L. She has been given nebulised salbutamol and ipratropium, intravenous hydrocortisone, and controlled oxygen therapy for 1 hour with no improvement. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in her management?
- ADischarge with a short course of oral prednisolone and home oxygen
- BIncrease the inspired oxygen concentration to achieve saturation above 96%
- CAdminister intravenous aminophylline and reassess in 4 hours
- DCommence bilevel non-invasive ventilation
- EProceed immediately to endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation
Show answer
Persistent respiratory acidosis with pH less than 7.35 and hypercapnia despite optimal medical therapy, including bronchodilators and corticosteroids, is a key indication for non-invasive ventilation in an acute COPD exacerbation. Non-invasive ventilation reduces the work of breathing, improves alveolar ventilation, and lowers the need for intubation and associated complications in patients who remain alert and can protect their airway. Invasive ventilation is reserved for those who fail non-invasive ventilation, cannot tolerate it, or have a reduced conscious state or inability to protect the airway. Increasing oxygen without addressing the ventilatory failure risks worsening hypercapnia by removing the hypoxic respiratory drive.
- A. Discharge is inappropriate given ongoing acute respiratory acidosis and hypoxaemia despite maximal medical therapy.
- B. Over-oxygenation in COPD can worsen hypercapnia by blunting hypoxic respiratory drive and increasing ventilation-perfusion mismatch.
- C. Aminophylline is not first-line and delaying ventilatory support risks further deterioration given the current acidosis.
- E. Invasive ventilation is reserved for patients who fail or cannot tolerate non-invasive ventilation or who cannot protect their airway, neither of which applies here.
A 45-year-old woman is admitted to the intensive care unit with septic shock secondary to pyelonephritis. On day 2 of admission she develops worsening breathlessness. She is intubated and ventilated with positive end-expiratory pressure of 8 cmH2O. Arterial blood gas on FiO2 0.6 shows PaO2 54 mmHg. Chest X-ray shows new bilateral airspace opacities consistent with pulmonary oedema that are not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload, and transthoracic echocardiogram shows normal left ventricular function. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
- AAcute respiratory distress syndrome
- BPulmonary embolism with infarction
- CTransfusion-related acute lung injury
- DVentilator-associated pneumonia
- ECardiogenic pulmonary oedema
Show answer
The Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome requires onset within 1 week of a known clinical insult, bilateral opacities on chest imaging not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload, and a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 300 mmHg or less with a minimum positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH2O. This patient's PaO2/FiO2 ratio is 54/0.6, which equals 90 mmHg, meeting criteria for severe ARDS, in the setting of a clear precipitating illness, sepsis from pyelonephritis, with a normal echocardiogram excluding a primary cardiac cause. Ventilator-associated pneumonia and pulmonary embolism do not typically produce bilateral diffuse opacities with this pattern so early in the clinical course, and there is no history of recent transfusion to suggest transfusion-related acute lung injury.
- B. There is no clinical evidence of embolism such as pleuritic pain or risk factors, and infarction would not typically cause bilateral diffuse opacities.
- C. There is no history of recent blood product transfusion, which is required to diagnose transfusion-related acute lung injury.
- D. Ventilator-associated pneumonia typically develops after at least 48 hours of ventilation and usually causes focal rather than diffuse bilateral opacities.
- E. Normal left ventricular function on echocardiogram and the clinical context of sepsis argue against a cardiogenic cause.
Preventive and general practice care
2 questionsA 42-year-old man attends his general practitioner for an unrelated issue. He mentions he smokes 15 cigarettes a day and has done so for 20 years. He has not previously discussed quitting with his doctor. He says he is not really thinking about quitting at the moment. Following the 5As framework for smoking cessation, which of the following is the most appropriate next step?
- AAvoid raising the topic further today since he has stated he is not interested in quitting
- BPrescribe nicotine replacement therapy immediately to initiate treatment
- CAdvise him clearly and personally that quitting smoking is the most important action he can take for his health, then assess his interest in quitting
- DSchedule a dedicated follow-up appointment solely to discuss quitting before giving any advice
- EArrange a referral to a smoking cessation clinic regardless of his stated readiness
Show answer
The 5As framework, Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange, as recommended in the RACGP Red Book, directs clinicians to ask about smoking status, then advise clearly and personally on the benefits of quitting regardless of current readiness to change, and then assess the patient's willingness to quit before moving to assist or arrange follow-up. Brief, clear, personalised advice from a general practitioner increases quit attempts even in patients who are not currently contemplating quitting. Arranging referral or prescribing nicotine replacement therapy before assessing readiness skips essential steps in the framework. Avoiding the topic entirely misses an opportunity for brief intervention, which should occur opportunistically rather than requiring a dedicated appointment.
- A. Brief opportunistic advice should still be given even if the patient initially states low interest, as it increases future quit attempts.
- B. Nicotine replacement therapy should be offered after assessing readiness and interest in quitting, not initiated immediately without discussion.
- D. Brief intervention using the 5As can and should occur opportunistically during the current consultation rather than requiring a separate appointment.
- E. Referral should follow assessment of readiness and patient preference, not precede advice and assessment.
A 58-year-old woman undergoes spirometry in general practice for assessment of suspected chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The practice nurse obtains three flow-volume curves. Review of the printout shows that the forced vital capacity varies by 250 mL between the two best curves, and the expiratory time in the best effort is 4.5 seconds with a clear plateau at the end of expiration. Which of the following best describes the quality of this spirometry test?
- AUnacceptable, because expiratory time of less than 6 seconds always invalidates the test regardless of plateau
- BUnacceptable, because the forced vital capacity should be reproducible to within 100 mL between the two best curves
- CAcceptable, because the variation between curves of 250 mL meets standard repeatability criteria
- DUnacceptable, because at least five flow-volume curves must always be obtained regardless of quality
- EAcceptable, because a plateau at the end of expiration is irrelevant to test quality
Show answer
Current spirometry quality standards require that the forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second from the two best acceptable curves agree within 150 mL (or within 100 mL for people with a forced vital capacity under 1 litre) to be considered repeatable. A difference of 250 mL between the best two curves exceeds this threshold and indicates poor repeatability, so the test should be repeated or interpreted with caution. A clear end-expiratory plateau and expiratory time of at least 3 to 6 seconds are markers of good individual curve quality, but they do not substitute for between-curve repeatability. Only three technically acceptable curves are generally required if repeatability criteria are met; up to eight may be attempted if needed, but five is not an absolute fixed requirement.
- A. Expiratory time requirements are a guide for adequacy of a single curve, not an absolute cut-off that alone invalidates an otherwise plateaued curve.
- C. 250 mL variation exceeds the accepted repeatability threshold of 150 mL (or 100 mL for very low volumes), so this does not meet standard criteria.
- D. Three acceptable curves meeting repeatability criteria are sufficient; five curves are not an absolute requirement if criteria are met with fewer attempts.
- E. An end-expiratory plateau is an important marker of complete exhalation and is relevant to assessing individual curve quality.
1. [Asthma] Diagnosis of asthma in adult via spirometry showing reversible obstr
1 questionsA 34-year-old woman presents with a 6-month history of intermittent wheeze and nocturnal cough. Spirometry before bronchodilator shows FEV1 2.10 L (68% predicted) and FVC 3.20 L, with FEV1/FVC ratio 0.66. After 400 microgram inhaled salbutamol, FEV1 rises to 2.55 L. What is the most likely diagnosis?
- ARestrictive lung disease
- BChronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- CNormal spirometry
- DVocal cord dysfunction
- EAsthma
Show answer
The baseline FEV1/FVC ratio of 0.66 confirms airflow obstruction. The post-bronchodilator increase in FEV1 from 2.10 L to 2.55 L represents a rise of 21% from baseline and 450 mL in absolute terms, exceeding the threshold of ≥12% and ≥200 mL used to define significant reversibility. This degree of reversible obstruction in a patient with a compatible clinical history (episodic wheeze, nocturnal cough) is diagnostic of asthma. COPD typically shows irreversible or only partially reversible obstruction.
- A. Restrictive disease shows a reduced FVC with a normal or increased FEV1/FVC ratio, not reduced ratio as seen here.
- B. COPD obstruction is usually fixed or only minimally reversible, unlike the large bronchodilator response seen here.
- C. The reduced FEV1/FVC ratio confirms obstruction, so spirometry is not normal.
- D. Vocal cord dysfunction classically causes a flattened inspiratory loop with normal spirometry between episodes, not reversible obstruction.
2. [Asthma] Stepwise pharmacotherapy - choosing ICS/LABA reliever (SMART regimen
1 questionsA 27-year-old man with mild persistent asthma uses salbutamol as needed approximately three times per week and has had two exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids in the past year. His GP wishes to start a single inhaler maintenance and reliever therapy (SMART) regimen as recommended by Australian asthma guidelines. Which combination inhaler is most appropriate for this regimen?
- ASalmeterol-fluticasone propionate
- BFluticasone furoate-vilanterol
- CBudesonide-formoterol
- DTiotropium-olodaterol
- EBeclometasone-salbutamol
Show answer
Budesonide-formoterol is the only combination approved and recommended for SMART because formoterol has a rapid onset of action (within minutes) comparable to salbutamol, in addition to its long duration of action. This allows the same inhaler to be used both for daily maintenance dosing and for symptom relief, reducing reliance on short-acting beta agonists and lowering exacerbation risk. Salmeterol has a slow onset of action, making it unsuitable as a reliever despite being a long-acting beta agonist. Australian guidelines (eTG, National Asthma Council) specifically endorse budesonide-formoterol for this purpose.
- A. Salmeterol has a slow onset of action (15-20 minutes) and cannot be used as a reliever medication.
- B. Vilanterol is a once-daily long-acting beta agonist with slow onset, not suitable for as-needed relief.
- D. Tiotropium-olodaterol is a long-acting muscarinic antagonist/LABA combination used in COPD, not a SMART reliever option.
- E. Salbutamol combined with an ICS in a fixed inhaler is not how SMART is formulated; SMART uses an ICS/formoterol combination given flexibly.
3. [Asthma] Acute severe asthma assessment - recognising life-threatening featur
1 questionsA 19-year-old woman is brought to the emergency department with acute breathlessness. She is drowsy and able to speak only single words. Respiratory rate is 8 breaths/min, heart rate 54 beats/min, blood pressure 95/60 mmHg, and oxygen saturation 88% on room air. On auscultation, the chest is silent with no audible wheeze. Arterial blood gas shows pH 7.28, PaCO2 58 mmHg, PaO2 52 mmHg. Which feature indicates that this is a life-threatening asthma attack rather than simply a severe attack?
- AInability to complete sentences in one breath
- BHeart rate greater than 110 beats per minute
- CSilent chest with a normal or rising PaCO2
- DPeak expiratory flow between 50 and 75% of predicted
- ERespiratory rate greater than 25 breaths per minute
Show answer
A silent chest indicates minimal air movement due to near-complete airway closure, and a normal or rising PaCO2 (here 58 mmHg) signals respiratory muscle fatigue and impending respiratory failure, both classic markers of life-threatening asthma. Bradycardia, bradypnoea, drowsiness and hypotension in this context are additional ominous signs of exhaustion and hypoxaemia. Features such as tachypnoea, tachycardia and inability to complete sentences indicate severe but not necessarily life-threatening asthma. Peak flow 50-75% of predicted is consistent with a mild-to-moderate attack.
- A. Inability to complete sentences in one breath is a feature of severe asthma.
- B. Tachycardia above 110/min is a feature of severe, not life-threatening, asthma.
- D. A peak flow of 50-75% predicted indicates a mild to moderate attack, not life-threatening disease.
- E. Tachypnoea above 25/min is a feature of severe, not life-threatening, asthma.
5. [Asthma] Spirometry technique - correct interpretation of FEV1/FVC ratio and
1 questionsA 45-year-old man undergoes spirometry for investigation of chronic cough and exertional dyspnoea. Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 is 2.40 L and FVC is 3.60 L. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 is 2.52 L. The treating doctor wants to determine whether this response meets the criterion for significant bronchodilator reversibility used to support a diagnosis of asthma. What is the most appropriate interpretation of this result?
- ANot significant, as FEV1/FVC ratio must also normalise to greater than 0.80
- BSignificant, as any measurable increase in FEV1 after bronchodilator confirms asthma
- CNot significant, as the rise is less than 12% and 200 mL from baseline
- DSignificant, as the rise is greater than 10% of predicted FEV1
- ESignificant, as the absolute rise of 120 mL exceeds the diagnostic threshold
Show answer
A clinically significant bronchodilator response requires an increase in FEV1 of at least 12% from baseline AND at least 200 mL in absolute terms. Here the rise is 120 mL, which is only 5% of the baseline FEV1 of 2.40 L, so neither threshold is met and the result does not support a diagnosis of reversible airway obstruction on this test. Normalisation of the FEV1/FVC ratio is not a required criterion for defining reversibility. A trivial rise of any magnitude is not diagnostic; the defined percentage and absolute thresholds must both be met.
- A. Normalisation of the ratio to above 0.80 is not part of the standard reversibility criterion.
- B. Reversibility requires meeting defined percentage and absolute thresholds, not merely any increase in FEV1.
- D. The correct percentage threshold is 12% of the baseline FEV1, not 10% of predicted FEV1, and this response does not meet even that figure.
- E. An absolute rise must also meet the 200 mL threshold and be at least 12% of baseline; 120 mL alone is insufficient and below both thresholds.
6. [Asthma] Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction - preventive inhaler timing bef
1 questionsA 16-year-old competitive swimmer with known asthma reports cough, chest tightness and wheeze occurring consistently during training sessions, resolving within an hour of stopping exercise. Her asthma is otherwise well controlled on low-dose inhaled corticosteroid. She wants to know how to prevent symptoms during training. Which strategy is most appropriate?
- AUse oral montelukast on the morning of competition days only
- BInhale salbutamol 15 minutes before starting exercise
- CBegin a warm-up only, without any inhaler use before exercise
- DTake a double dose of her regular inhaled corticosteroid on training days
- EInhale salbutamol immediately after finishing exercise
Show answer
Short-acting beta agonists such as salbutamol are highly effective at preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction when taken 10-15 minutes before exercise, providing protection for 2-3 hours through bronchodilation and prevention of mediator release from airway mast cells. Taking salbutamol after exercise treats symptoms rather than preventing them. Doubling the inhaled corticosteroid dose on training days is not supported by guidelines and does not address the acute bronchoconstrictive response to exercise. A warm-up alone may reduce symptoms in some patients but is not as reliably effective as pre-exercise salbutamol for someone with confirmed symptoms.
- A. Montelukast can be used preventively but is not first-line, and using it only on competition days is inconsistent with its recommended regular or pre-exercise dosing timing.
- C. A warm-up alone is a reasonable adjunct but does not reliably prevent symptoms in patients with confirmed exercise-induced bronchoconstriction without pre-treatment.
- D. Doubling the daily ICS dose on training days is not a recommended strategy for preventing exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.
- E. Giving salbutamol after exercise treats established symptoms rather than preventing the bronchoconstriction from occurring.
7. [Asthma] Asthma in pregnancy - safety of ICS and avoiding undertreatment — an
1 questionsA 29-year-old woman who is 14 weeks pregnant has moderate persistent asthma previously well controlled on budesonide inhaler. She is concerned about the effect of the medication on her baby and asks whether she should stop using it during pregnancy. Her obstetrician confirms the pregnancy is otherwise progressing normally. What is the most appropriate advice regarding her asthma management?
- AReduce the inhaled corticosteroid dose by half to minimise fetal exposure
- BStop the inhaled corticosteroid and use salbutamol only when symptomatic
- CContinue inhaled corticosteroid at the current dose, as poorly controlled asthma poses greater risk to the fetus than the medication
- DStop all asthma medication and reassess after delivery
- ESwitch to a leukotriene receptor antagonist as the preferred preventer in pregnancy
Show answer
Inhaled corticosteroids, including budesonide, are considered safe throughout pregnancy and should be continued at the dose needed to maintain good asthma control. Poorly controlled asthma is associated with significant risks including pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction, preterm birth and increased perinatal mortality, which outweigh any theoretical risk from inhaled corticosteroid use. Stopping or reducing the preventer dose risks loss of control and exacerbations, which are more dangerous to the fetus than continued treatment. Leukotriene receptor antagonists are not first-line preventers in pregnancy and inhaled corticosteroids remain the preferred option.
- A. Reducing the dose without clinical indication risks under-treatment and loss of asthma control.
- B. Stopping the ICS risks loss of asthma control, increasing the risk of exacerbations which are more harmful to the fetus than the medication itself.
- D. Stopping all medication exposes both mother and fetus to the risks of uncontrolled asthma, including hypoxia and exacerbation-related complications.
- E. Leukotriene receptor antagonists are not first-line preventers in pregnancy; inhaled corticosteroids remain preferred.
8. [Asthma] Occupational asthma - recognising temporal pattern linked to workpla
1 questionsA 38-year-old spray painter presents with a 4-month history of wheeze, chest tightness and cough. He reports that symptoms are worse by the end of his work shift and improve over the weekend, but recur again on returning to work on Monday. He has no personal history of asthma or atopy before starting this job two years ago. Which feature of his history is most useful in identifying occupational asthma as the likely diagnosis?
- ASymptoms being worse specifically at the end of the shift rather than the start
- BAbsence of a personal history of atopy or childhood asthma
- COnset of symptoms occurring exactly four months ago
- DOccupation involving a role classified as physically demanding
- ESymptom improvement away from work with recurrence on return to the workplace
Show answer
The pattern of symptomatic improvement during days or periods away from work (such as weekends or holidays) with recurrence upon return to the workplace is the key diagnostic clue for occupational asthma, reflecting a causal relationship with a workplace sensitiser or irritant, in this case likely isocyanates used in spray paint. This temporal relationship should prompt further objective assessment, such as serial peak flow monitoring at and away from work, and specialist referral. Onset timing alone, absence of atopy, or the specific time of day symptoms worsen are less discriminating features than the work-related periodicity.
- A. Timing within the shift is less specific than the overall pattern of improvement away from work and recurrence on return.
- B. Absence of atopy makes a new workplace sensitiser more likely as a cause, but this alone does not establish the diagnosis.
- C. The specific duration since symptom onset does not by itself establish an occupational cause.
- D. Physical demands of a job are not relevant to the diagnosis of occupational asthma from chemical or sensitiser exposure.
2. [COPD] GOLD/eTG stepwise management - when to add LAMA/LABA vs ICS — angle: p
1 questionsA 66-year-old woman with spirometry-confirmed COPD (FEV1 55% predicted) has been using a salbutamol inhaler as needed. She reports breathlessness walking on flat ground that limits her to pace of other people her age (modified Medical Research Council grade 2), with no exacerbations in the past 12 months. She has never smoked currently (quit 10 years ago) and has no features suggesting asthma overlap. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in her pharmacological management?
- AAdd a combination long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting beta-agonist
- BAdd an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta-agonist combination
- CAdd an inhaled corticosteroid alone
- DAdd a long-acting muscarinic antagonist
- ECommence oral theophylline
Show answer
For patients with persistent breathlessness on short-acting bronchodilators alone and no history of frequent exacerbations, Therapeutic Guidelines recommend starting regular long-acting bronchodilator monotherapy, with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) or long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) being first-line. Inhaled corticosteroids are reserved for patients with frequent exacerbations or features of asthma overlap, as they increase pneumonia risk without clear benefit in low-exacerbation-risk COPD. Dual bronchodilator therapy (LAMA/LABA) is generally reserved for patients with ongoing symptoms despite single long-acting bronchodilator therapy. Theophylline is a later option due to its narrow therapeutic index and side-effect profile.
- A. Dual bronchodilator therapy is typically introduced after inadequate response to a single long-acting bronchodilator, not as the first step.
- B. ICS/LABA combinations are reserved for exacerbation-prone or overlap phenotypes, not the initial step for symptom control alone.
- C. Inhaled corticosteroids are not first-line and are reserved for patients with frequent exacerbations or asthma features, which this patient lacks.
- E. Theophylline is a later-line option due to its narrow therapeutic index and is not appropriate as an early addition.
4. [COPD] Oxygen therapy in COPD - risk of hypercapnic respiratory failure with
1 questionsA 72-year-old man with severe COPD is brought to the emergency department with an acute exacerbation. On arrival, oxygen saturation is 82% on room air, and he is given oxygen via face mask at 10 L/minute. Over the next 30 minutes he becomes increasingly drowsy and difficult to rouse. Repeat arterial blood gas shows pH 7.21, PaCO2 88 mmHg, PaO2 145 mmHg, and bicarbonate 30 mmol/L. Which of the following mechanisms best explains his deterioration?
- ARebound pulmonary vasoconstriction reducing cardiac output and causing cerebral hypoperfusion
- BDirect central nervous system toxicity from hyperoxia causing respiratory centre suppression
- COxygen-induced bronchospasm causing acute airway obstruction
- DLoss of hypoxic respiratory drive combined with worsening ventilation-perfusion mismatch and Haldane effect reducing carbon dioxide clearance
- EOxygen-induced surfactant dysfunction leading to alveolar collapse and hypoventilation
Show answer
In patients with chronic hypercapnic COPD, high-flow oxygen can precipitate worsening hypercapnia through several mechanisms: blunting of hypoxic respiratory drive (which has become the dominant stimulus to breathe in chronic CO2 retainers), release of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction leading to increased perfusion of poorly ventilated alveoli (worsening V/Q mismatch), and the Haldane effect, where oxyhaemoglobin has a reduced affinity for carbon dioxide, releasing more CO2 into the plasma. This combination leads to rising PaCO2, respiratory acidosis, and CO2 narcosis, explaining his drowsiness. Target oxygen saturation in COPD exacerbations should typically be 88 to 92% using titrated low-flow oxygen.
- A. Oxygen causes pulmonary vasodilation, not rebound vasoconstriction, and this is not the primary mechanism of CO2 retention.
- B. Hyperoxia does not directly suppress the respiratory centre at the doses used clinically; the mechanism relates to loss of hypoxic drive and V/Q mismatch.
- C. Oxygen therapy does not cause bronchospasm; this is not the mechanism of oxygen-induced hypercapnia.
- E. Surfactant dysfunction from oxygen toxicity occurs with prolonged high-concentration exposure over days, not within 30 minutes, and is not the mechanism here.
5. [COPD] Long-term oxygen therapy - criteria for home O2 (PaO2 thresholds) — an
1 questionsA 69-year-old man with severe COPD (post-bronchodilator FEV1 38% predicted) is reviewed in the respiratory clinic. He is a stable ex-smoker on optimised inhaled therapy and has had no exacerbations in the past 3 months. Two arterial blood gas measurements taken 3 weeks apart while breathing room air, both performed when clinically stable, show PaO2 of 54 mmHg and 52 mmHg respectively, with normal PaCO2. He has no evidence of peripheral oedema or polycythaemia. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management?
- AReassure him that his oxygen levels are acceptable and continue current therapy
- BRepeat arterial blood gas measurement in 12 months to monitor trend
- CRefer for assessment for long-term domiciliary oxygen therapy
- DCommence oxygen therapy only during exercise and sleep
- EArrange overnight oximetry before considering any oxygen therapy
Show answer
Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is indicated in stable COPD patients with a PaO2 consistently at or below 55 mmHg (7.3 kPa) on room air, confirmed on two measurements taken at least 3 weeks apart while clinically stable. This patient meets that threshold on both occasions, and LTOT has been shown to improve survival in such patients when used for at least 15 hours a day. The presence of cor pulmonale or polycythaemia lowers the threshold to PaO2 56 to 59 mmHg (7.3 to 8.0 kPa), but is not required when PaO2 is already at or below 55 mmHg. Overnight oximetry and exercise-only oxygen are relevant to nocturnal or exertional desaturation assessment, not to qualification for continuous LTOT in this setting.
- A. A PaO2 at or below 55 mmHg on two stable measurements meets the threshold for long-term oxygen therapy and should not simply be reassured.
- B. Delaying further assessment for 12 months is inappropriate when the patient already meets confirmed criteria for long-term oxygen therapy.
- D. Ambulatory or nocturnal-only oxygen is for patients who desaturate only with exertion or sleep, not for this patient who meets criteria for continuous LTOT.
- E. Overnight oximetry assesses nocturnal desaturation and is not required before referral when daytime PaO2 already meets LTOT criteria.
7. [COPD] Pulmonary rehabilitation referral - indication and evidence of benefit
1 questionsA 64-year-old woman with moderate COPD (FEV1 62% predicted) is reviewed 6 weeks after discharge from hospital following an exacerbation. She is now clinically stable on optimised inhaled therapy but reports persistent breathlessness that limits her to walking about 200 metres before stopping, and she has become increasingly deconditioned and anxious about leaving home. She has no unstable cardiac disease and is keen to improve her function. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in her management?
- ARefer for lung volume reduction surgery assessment
- BIncrease the dose of her inhaled corticosteroid
- CRefer her for a formal pulmonary rehabilitation program
- DAdvise strict rest until breathlessness improves
- ECommence long-term home oxygen therapy
Show answer
Pulmonary rehabilitation is a structured program combining supervised exercise training, education, and self-management support, and is strongly recommended for patients with COPD who have persistent breathlessness or functional limitation, particularly following a recent exacerbation and hospitalisation. It has high-quality evidence for improving exercise capacity, reducing symptoms, improving quality of life, and reducing readmission rates when started soon after an exacerbation. This patient's functional limitation and deconditioning without evidence of hypoxaemia or severe structural disease make her an ideal candidate. Oxygen therapy, surgical referral, and increasing ICS dose are not supported by her current clinical picture.
- A. Lung volume reduction surgery is reserved for selected patients with severe hyperinflation and specific emphysema patterns after optimisation of medical therapy, not as a next step here.
- B. There is no indication her current exacerbation or symptoms are due to inadequate inhaled corticosteroid dosing; her issue is functional deconditioning.
- D. Rest worsens deconditioning in COPD; graded exercise through pulmonary rehabilitation is the recommended approach.
- E. There is no stated evidence of resting hypoxaemia meeting criteria for long-term oxygen therapy in this patient.
8. [COPD] Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency - when to suspect and test in young COP
1 questionsA 38-year-old woman presents with progressive exertional breathlessness over 18 months. She has never smoked and has no occupational exposures. Spirometry shows an obstructive pattern with FEV1 54% predicted and FEV1/FVC ratio 0.58, not significantly reversible with bronchodilator. High-resolution CT chest shows panacinar emphysema predominantly affecting the lower lobes. Her father died of liver cirrhosis in his fifties. Which of the following is the most appropriate next investigation?
- ASerum immunoglobulin E level
- BSerum alpha-1 antitrypsin level
- CSkin prick testing for common aeroallergens
- DSweat chloride test
- EHigh-resolution CT chest repeated in 6 months
Show answer
Early-onset emphysema in a non-smoker, especially with a basal/lower lobe predominant panacinar pattern on CT and a family history of unexplained liver disease, should raise suspicion for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. This autosomal codominant condition results in reduced circulating levels of alpha-1 antitrypsin, a protease inhibitor that normally protects lung tissue from neutrophil elastase, leading to early emphysema; the same abnormal protein can accumulate in hepatocytes causing liver disease. A low serum alpha-1 antitrypsin level prompts confirmatory genotyping or phenotyping. The other investigations are not indicated by this clinical and radiological picture.
- A. Serum IgE is used in the assessment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis or atopy, not in the evaluation of early-onset emphysema.
- C. Allergy testing is relevant to asthma or atopic disease, not to this presentation of early emphysema with family history of liver disease.
- D. Sweat chloride testing is used to diagnose cystic fibrosis, which typically presents with bronchiectasis and recurrent infections rather than isolated panacinar emphysema in an adult.
- E. Repeating imaging without addressing the underlying cause would delay diagnosis when a specific and simple blood test is indicated.
Frequently asked questions
Are these real AMC MCQ (CAT) questions?
No. They are original practice questions written in the style of AMC MCQ (CAT) for its content outline. Real exam items are confidential. Every question here was solved blind by a second, independent model and removed if the key was disputed.
How should I use these respiratory medicine questions?
Do the quiz first without looking at the answers, then read the explanation for every question you missed or guessed. The educational objective under each answer is the fact to remember.
Are the questions free?
Yes. All questions, answers and explanations on this page are free and need no account.
More AMC MCQ (CAT) topics
Other exams
AMC MCQ (CAT) is administered by Australian Medical Council. WhiteCoat Pro is not affiliated with or endorsed by them. All questions are original practice items written by the WhiteCoat Pro editorial team with AI assistance and checked by a second, independent AI model that solves every question blind; items with a disputed key are removed. They are not real exam questions. Educational use only, not medical advice.