List of Abbreviations
ALT – alanine aminotransferase
AST – aspartate aminotransferase
BF – Biofeedback
BoNT-A – Botulinum toxin type A**
TMJ – Temporomandibular joint
HBO – hyperbaric oxygenation
GCS – Glucocorticosteroids
HFS – Hemifacial spasm
DNA – deoxyribonucleic acid
PRFA – Pulsed radiofrequency ablation
MAB FN – Marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve
CBCT – Cone-beam computed tomography
CBT – cognitive behavioral therapy
CT – computed tomography
PT – physical therapy
ICD – International Classification of Diseases
ICHD – International Classification of Headache Disorders
ICOF – International Classification of Orofacial Pain
MOFSM – Myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm
DLI – Depressor labii inferioris (muscle)
MRI – magnetic resonance imaging
NVC – Neurovascular conflict
FNP – Facial nerve neuropathy
NSAIDs – non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs
GLN – Glossopharyngeal neuralgia
CVA – cerebrovascular accident
MUAP – motor unit action potential
PIFP – Persistent idiopathic facial pain
РКИ – randomized controlled trial
SB – The Sunnybrook Facial Grading System
ESR – erythrocyte sedimentation rate
BMS – Burning mouth syndrome
CRP – C-reactive protein
SRFA – Standard (thermal) radiofrequency ablation
rTMS – Transcranial magnetic stimulation
TN – Trigeminal neuralgia
US – ultrasound examination
HB – House-Brackmann Grading System
COX – cyclooxygenase
ALP – alkaline phosphatase
SNEMG – Stimulation electroneuromyography
EMG – Needle electromyography
AMPA – α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid
DN-4 (fr. la douleur neuropathique – neuropathic pain)
IL – Interleukin
ICOP – International Classification of Orofacial Pain
NMDA – N-methyl-D-aspartate
SUNCT – Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing
TNF – Tumor necrosis factor
Terms and Definitions
Trigeminal nerve disorders:
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a disorder characterized by unilateral, recurrent, brief paroxysms of pain resembling electric shocks in semiology, sudden in onset and termination, clearly provoked by non-noxious stimuli and restricted to one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve.
Neurovascular conflict (NVC) is a condition of nerve-vessel interaction in which a vulnerable portion of a nerve root is affected by an adjacent blood vessel.
Allodynia is pain resulting from a stimulus that normally does not provoke pain, which can be contact-induced (tactile/mechanical or thermal allodynia) or movement-induced (kinesigenic allodynia).
Anesthesia is the complete loss of one or more modalities of sensation (tactile, thermal, proprioceptive, vibratory).
Anesthesia dolorosa is pain felt in an area of anesthesia.
Hyperalgesia is increased pain sensitivity to noxious stimuli: intense pain from mild nociceptive stimulation within the innervation zone of the damaged part of the nervous system (primary hyperalgesia) or adjacent and even distant areas (secondary hyperalgesia).
Hyperesthesia is increased sensitivity to various stimuli (tactile, thermal, cold) that is disproportionate to the stimulus.
Hyperpathia is an enhanced or altered sensation with an unpleasantly emotional component that may persist after the cessation of a painful, tactile, or thermal stimulus. The sensory threshold may be elevated.
Hypesthesia is a partial impairment of one or more modalities of sensation (tactile, thermal, proprioceptive, vibratory);
Dysesthesia – an unpleasant abnormal sensation, whether spontaneous or evoked.
Paresthesia is a spontaneous or evoked (by light tactile, thermal stimulus, or movement) sensation of tingling, pins and needles, pressure, or tightening in any part of the body.
Prosopalgia is pain in one half of the face.
Spontaneous pain is pain occurring without any external stimulus.
Amaurosis fugax is transient monocular blindness.
Facial nerve disorders:
Facial nerve neuropathy (FNN) is a disorder of the facial nerve characterized by acutely developed or progressively worsening facial asymmetry due to unilateral weakness of facial muscles, impaired eye closure, and—depending on the site of the lesion—symptoms such as dry eyes or tearing, taste disturbances, hyperacusis-type hearing impairment; later symptoms may include increased muscle tone on the healthy or affected side of the face, and synkinesis leading to post-paralytic hemispasm.
Bell's palsy is an idiopathic form of FNN.
Prosoparesis is a decrease in muscle strength on one half of the face.
Prosoplegia is the absence of movement in the muscles of one half of the face.
Hemifacial spasm (HFS) is a facial nerve disorder characterized by chronic, paroxysmal, painless, involuntary, unilateral tonic or clonic contractions of a group of facial muscles, including at rest and during sleep.
Facial myokymia is a facial nerve disorder characterized by spontaneous, recurrent, unilateral, self-limiting, low-amplitude, pulsating twitches in one of the facial muscles (most commonly the lower portion of the palpebral part of the orbicularis oculi muscle) lasting from a few seconds to a few hours, or less frequently up to a few weeks. These twitches are more noticeable to the patient than to others, may be exacerbated by voluntary movements, but are not initiated by them.
Stimulation electroneuromyography (SNEMG) is a functional diagnostics method that assesses the presence and severity of peripheral nerve damage.
M-wave amplitude is an EMG parameter that indirectly characterizes the number of fascicles in the motor nerve trunk capable of conducting nerve impulses.
Needle electromyography (EMG) is a functional diagnostics method that evaluates the bioelectrical activity of a muscle using a bipolar concentric needle electrode at rest or during voluntary contraction.
Motor unit potential (MUP) is an EMG parameter that characterizes the electrical activity of muscles during contraction.
Physical therapy (PT) is a group of rehabilitation methods characterized by the effect on the patient using physical exercises.
Biofeedback (BFB) is a rehabilitation method based on developing the patient's skills of self-control and self-regulation of various body functions to improve general well-being.
Surgical treatment is a method of treating diseases by dividing and uniting tissues during a surgical operation.
Level of evidence – the degree of confidence that the observed effect of a medical intervention is true.
Level of убедительности рекомендаций (Grade of Recommendation) is the degree of certainty in the validity of the intervention effect and that following the recommendations will bring more benefit than harm in a particular situation.
Working group means two or more people of the same or different professions working together and harmoniously to create clinical guidelines and bearing joint responsibility for the results of this work.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
1.1.1 Trigeminal nerve disorders
All trigeminal nerve lesions can be divided into four blocks (Figure 1):

Figure 1. Classification of trigeminal nerve lesions
1.1.1.1 Trigeminal neuralgia
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a disorder characterized by recurrent unilateral brief episodes of pain, semiologically corresponding to electric shocks, sudden in onset and termination, with clear provocation by innocuous stimuli limited to one or more divisions of the trigeminal nerve. It may develop without apparent causes or be a consequence of another diagnosed disorder. In addition, concomitant continuous pain of moderate intensity may be present within the distribution of the affected trigeminal nerve branch(es) [1,2].
1.1.1.2. Atypical facial pain
Persistent atypical (idiopathic) facial pain includes the following conditions (Figure 2):
Persistent idiopathic facial pain;
Myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm;
Burning mouth syndrome.

Figure 2. Classification of atypical facial pain
Persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) (previously classified as: "atypical odontalgia", "atypical facial pain") is a persistent facial pain with a variable clinical presentation, recurring daily for more than 2 hours per day for more than 3 months in the absence of clinically apparent neurological deficits or a preceding cause [3–8].
Comment: The International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP) criteria define two types: persistent idiopathic facial pain and persistent idiopathic dentoalveolar pain. In both cases, the pain is constant, but with possible periodic exacerbations.
Myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm (MOFAMS) is pain caused by a sudden, involuntary, reversible tonic contraction of a muscle. Such a spasm can occur in any muscle involved in mastication. An acute malocclusion may develop [5].
Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is an intraoral burning or dysesthetic sensation, recurring daily for more than 2 hours per day for more than 3 months without clinically evident signs of an underlying disease [5].
1.1.1.3. Other trigeminal nerve disorders, unspecified trigeminal nerve disorder
Neuropathic pain is pain caused by a lesion or disease of the somatosensory nervous system [9,10].
Trigeminal neuropathic pain is facial pain in the area of one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve caused by another disorder and indicating nerve damage [5].
1.1.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) are a group of primary headache disorders. According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3), the following types of TACs are distinguished [1]:
Cluster headache (episodic, chronic)
Paroxysmal hemicrania (episodic, chronic)
Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing, SUNCT syndrome (episodic, chronic)
Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms, SUNA syndrome (episodic, chronic)
Hemicrania continua (remitting subtype, unremitting subtype)
Probable trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (probable cluster headache, probable paroxysmal hemicrania).
Cluster headache (CH) is a type of TAC characterized by unilateral, short-lasting attacks of excruciating, extremely severe pain localized in the orbital, suborbital, or temporal region, usually accompanied by ocular and nasal autonomic symptoms. The intensity of cluster headache is so high that it is also referred to as suicide headache.
Paroxysmal hemicrania is strictly unilateral pain in the orbital, suborbital, temporal region, or a combination of these regions, lasting from 2 to 30 minutes and occurring several or many times a day; attacks are usually accompanied by autonomic symptoms (conjunctival injection, lacrimation, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, forehead and facial sweating, miosis, ptosis, and/or eyelid edema), responsive to indomethacin [1].
Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT syndrome) are brief unilateral pain attacks localized in the orbital and periorbital region, always accompanied by conjunctival injection and lacrimation [1]. Unlike SUNCT, during an attack of short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms (SUNA), one or none of the following is present: conjunctival injection and lacrimation [1].
Hemicrania continua (HC) is a rare type of primary headache disorder characterized by continuous unilateral moderate-intensity headache, with exacerbations of pain, cranial autonomic symptoms, and an absolute positive response to indomethacin [1].
1.1.2. Facial nerve disorders
Facial nerve lesion (peripheral type of impairment) is characterized predominantly by motor disorders (Figure 3). There are 2 groups of disorders: with deficit symptoms (FNP) and with irritation symptoms (involuntary movements).

Figure 3. Classification of facial nerve lesions
1.1.2.1. Facial nerve neuropathy
Facial nerve neuropathy (FNN) clinically presents with the acute development or progressive onset of facial asymmetry due to unilateral weakness of facial muscles (if movements are present – prosoparesis, if movements are absent – prosoplegia), impaired eye closure, and, depending on the level of the lesion, symptoms such as dry eye or lacrimation, taste disturbance, hyperacusis-type hearing impairment; at later stages, symptoms such as increased muscle tone of the healthy or affected side of the face, synkinesias up to the development of post-paralytic hemifacial spasm may develop [11–14].
Taking into account anatomical features, facial nerve lesion is possible at the following levels:
cerebellopontine angle,
internal acoustic meatus,
bony canal proximal to the origin of the greater petrosal nerve,
bony canal proximal to the origin of the stapedius nerve,
level of exit through the stylomastoid foramen,
parotid gland,
individual branches penetrating the facial muscles.
1.1.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
Hemifacial spasm clinically manifests as chronic paroxysmal painless involuntary unilateral tonic or clonic contractions of a group of facial muscles, including at rest and during nighttime [15].
1.1.2.3. Facial myokymia
Facial myokymia clinically presents as spontaneous, periodically recurring, and lasting from several seconds to several hours, less frequently up to several weeks, unilateral self-limiting, low-amplitude, pulsating twitches in one of the facial muscles (most commonly the lower portion of the palpebral part of the orbicularis oculi muscle), which are more obvious to the patient than to others, may increase with voluntary movements, but are not initiated by them [16,17].
1.1.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
Cranial neuropathy or cranial nerve neuropathy is defined as any damage to a cranial nerve at any level [18].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
1.2.1 Trigeminal nerve disorders
1.2.1.1 Trigeminal neuralgia
Depending on the etiology, classical, idiopathic, and symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia are distinguished [2,19].
Classical (primary) TN occurs due to neurovascular conflict. Compression of the nerve by a vein or artery leads to focal demyelination at the transition zone between the central and peripheral myelin sheaths, which stimulates the generation of ectopic impulses and ephaptic transmission, clinically manifesting as shooting pains. Most commonly, compression of the cisternal portion of the nerve by the superior cerebellar artery is observed.
Symptomatic (secondary) TN occurs due to irritation of the nerve root against the background of an underlying disease (nerve compression by a tumor or arteriovenous malformation, demyelination in patients with multiple sclerosis, and other rare causes).
In patients with idiopathic TN, the cause is unknown.
1.2.1.2 Atypical facial pain
Persistent idiopathic facial pain is a polyetiological syndrome that includes a myogenic or iatrogenic source of peripheral sensitization in the facial region, deficiency of central pain-inhibitory systems, as well as the presence of comorbid emotional-affective disorders [20–26].
Myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm — muscle spasm can be defined as a persistent involuntary muscle contraction (excluding spasticity, which is a phenomenon of central nervous system origin). The main cause of pain in muscle spasm is muscle ischemia, leading to the release of algogens such as bradykinin, ATP, and H+, as well as the presence of comorbid emotional-affective disorders [23].
Burning mouth syndrome — recent neurophysiological, psychophysical, neuropathopathologic, and imaging studies have shown that several neuropathic mechanisms, mostly subclinical, are involved in the pathophysiology of BMS. Small-fiber changes in the tongue epithelium explain the thermal hypesthesia and elevated taste perception thresholds found on quantitative sensory testing. Functional MRI in patients with BMS demonstrated reduced brain activation to thermal stimuli. Nevertheless, it appears that the diagnosis of primary BMS encompasses at least three distinct subclinical types of neuropathic pain that may overlap in individual patients. The first subgroup (50–65%) is characterized by mucosal small-fiber neuropathy. The second subgroup (20–25%) consists of patients with subclinical pathology of the lingual nerve, the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve, or the entire trigeminal system, which can be detected by careful neurophysiological examination. The third subgroup (20–40%) corresponds to the concept of central pain, which may be associated with decreased activity of brain dopaminergic systems [6,27].
1.2.1.3. Other disorders of the trigeminal nerve, trigeminal nerve disorder, unspecified
Trigeminal neuropathic pain occurs after nerve trauma, herpes virus infection, and other factors. The etiology may also remain undetermined [5].
The pathogenesis of the disease is not fully understood. Damage to the structures of the somatosensory nervous system cannot be considered as the cause of neuropathic pain, but rather serves as a predisposing factor [28]. Peripheral and central mechanisms are distinguished in the formation of neuropathic pain [29].
Peripheral mechanisms:
Decrease in pain threshold, activation of nociceptors;
Appearance of spontaneous (ectopic) activity in primary sensory neurons in the absence of peripheral stimulus;
Impaired neurotransmitter production in the spinal ganglia (Gasserian ganglion).
Central mechanisms:
Increased excitability of glutamate receptors (AMPA and NMDA subtypes) in the spinal cord and higher levels, or the "wind-up" phenomenon — enhanced response to incoming sensory stimuli;
Increased spontaneous background activity of the spinal cord (impaired inhibitory activity);
Increased activity in the brainstem and higher divisions.
The development of trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia is based on the reactivation of Herpes Zoster [30–32]. Following viral reactivation, complex changes occur in pain signaling pathways, leading to enhanced pain stimuli due to nociceptor sensitization, sensitivity to local inflammatory mediators, hyperexcitability of pain pathways, and impaired inhibitory control. Herpes Zoster replication can cause acute damage to sensory neurons, aggravating inflammatory tissue damage. In various cell and tissue types, Herpes Zoster directly or indirectly causes increased levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-17, IL-18, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). The presence of viral proteins combined with immune responses initiates inflammation at the affected site and promotes pain and hypersensitivity.
1.2.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Cluster headache
Currently, CH is considered a multifactorial disorder caused by genetic predisposition and environmental factors (stress, alcohol, histamine, sleep disturbances, sleep apnea, testosterone levels). Among first-degree relatives, the risk of developing CH is 5–18 times higher than in the general population. The mechanism of CH attack development is not fully understood. Disruption of hypothalamic circadian activity plays a role in the pathogenesis of CH, contributing to the disinhibition of nociceptive and autonomic pathways and the activation of the trigeminal system, with the release of neuropeptides (CGRP, substance P) leading to pain syndrome. The trigeminovascular complex also activates the superior salivatory nucleus of the facial nerve, which accounts for the autonomic symptoms.
Paroxysmal hemicrania
The pathogenesis of PH is less studied than that of other primary headaches. The development of a PH attack is associated with an increase in the levels of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide, which leads to the activation of the trigeminovascular complex and the autonomic nervous system. Functional MRI data indicate the involvement of the posterior hypothalamus in the formation of the attack.
Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing
The etiology and pathogenesis of SUNCT and SUNA are poorly understood. According to functional MRI during a SUNCT/SUNA attack, the hypothalamic region is activated; the hypothalamic zone is functionally connected with the pain system as well as with the superior salivatory nucleus, which explains the pain syndrome and autonomic symptoms during the attack. Most cases are considered primary headaches, but the literature describes cases of SUNCT and SUNA in patients with lesions (tumor, demyelination, infarction, infection) in the posterior cranial fossa and pituitary region, which necessitates neuroimaging [1].
Hemicrania continua
The etiology of hemicrania continua involves the activation of the trigeminal system, with elevated levels of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance P, and vasoactive intestinal peptide.
1.2.2 Facial nerve disorders
1.2.2.1. Facial nerve neuropathy
Facial neuropathy depending on the cause can be idiopathic (Bell's palsy) and symptomatic, for example, infectious, otogenic, traumatic, etc. (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Classification of forms of facial neuropathy
Idiopathic form of facial neuropathy (Bell's palsy) is a diagnosis of exclusion [33], however, several hypotheses for the development of FN exist, the main ones being viral and autoimmune. According to the autoimmune hypothesis, Bell's palsy is a mononeuritic variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome, an acute inflammatory demyelinating disease. According to the viral hypothesis, Bell's palsy is associated with the reactivation of a latent viral infection (main pathogens being HSV-1, HSV-2, and VZV) triggered by stress, cold, another type of infection, etc. [34]. At the same time, Chang B. et al. (2020) detected 84 pathogens in 30 epineurium samples from patients with FN, among which only 4 were viral species, while 10 were fungal species and 70 were bacterial species [35].
The disease is associated with seasonality (autumn), weather conditions (temperature fluctuations), and comorbid background (diabetes mellitus) [36–39].
Symptomatic form of FN includes:
Ramsay Hunt syndrome — a variant of FN due to herpetic infection of the geniculate ganglion, characterized by unilateral facial weakness/paralysis accompanied by pain and skin rashes [37,38]. The disease in 50–85% of patients is more severe than classical Bell's palsy and is characterized by a high tendency to recur [40,41].
Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome — a variant of FN, a genetic disorder characterized by recurrent unilateral facial weakness/paralysis combined with lip edema and fissured tongue [42].
«Other causes of facial nerve palsy» in 8–12% of cases are space-occupying lesions [43,44], such as facial nerve tumors (intra- and extracranial schwannomas / neuromas), cerebellopontine angle tumors, and parotid gland tumors. Frequent causes of facial nerve neuropathy (FNN) include complications of surgical, cosmetic, and dental interventions, traumatic brain injury, neurological disorders, infections, and metabolic disorders [45,46]. Less commonly, FNN develops as an early or late complication of radiosurgical treatment for vestibular schwannomas [47]. A high percentage of isolated FNN cases (34–56%) is observed in Lyme disease (borreliosis), which must be taken into account during differential diagnosis [48].
In clinical situations where the cause of FNN remains entirely unclear, the diagnosis of «unspecified facial nerve disorder» is established.
1.2.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
Hemifacial spasm, depending on the motor pattern, can be clonic, tonic, or clonic-tonic. In origin, it can be primary, occurring due to compression of the nerve root by a blood vessel (most commonly the anterior inferior cerebellar artery, less commonly the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, or a dystopic vertebral or basilar artery), or secondary (symptomatic)—resulting from compression of the facial nerve by a cerebellopontine angle or parotid gland tumor, vascular anomalies (arteriovenous malformations, intracranial arterial aneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas, angiomas), Chiari malformation and other structural anomalies of the posterior cranial fossa, middle ear and mastoid infections (otitis media, cholesteatoma), trauma, brainstem lesions (multiple sclerosis, stroke), following previous FNN (post-paralytic hemispasmodic syndrome), etc. HFS may also result from an idiopathic lower motor neuron lesion of the facial nerve (Figure 5) [15,49].

Figure 5. Classification of hemifacial spasm forms
The etiology of primary HFS involves chronic irritation of the facial nerve nucleus and/or its root. The root entry/exit zone is the transition site from oligodendroglia (central myelination) to Schwann cells (peripheral myelination). Compression of the root by blood vessels leads to axonal demyelination in this region and hyperexcitability of the facial nerve. Meanwhile, irritation of peripheral afferent fibers of the facial nerve leads to aberrant signal transmission to the central facial nerve nucleus, causing abnormal nuclear excitation and involuntary myoclonic contractions of the facial muscles on the affected side. In typical presentation, blood vessels compress the anterocaudal region of the nerve, whereas in atypical presentation, they compress the posterorostral region [50]. Precipitating factors that intensify spasms include cold, bright light, and stress.
Secondary hemifacial spasm differs in pathogenesis depending on the etiology. If the cause is a space-occupying lesion, facial nerve irritation occurs. One of the most complex in pathogenesis and insufficiently studied (with over 9 proposed theories of origin) is post-paralytic hemispasm.
Post-paralytic hemispasm is a secondary hemifacial spasm following prior FNN. It is known that idiopathic or non-traumatic symptomatic forms of FNN resolve in 60–70% of cases with complete or partial recovery of facial nerve function within 3–6 months [36,37,51,52], with more than 80% of these patients achieving recovery to House-Brackmann grade I–II [37]. In the remaining patients, consequences persist in the form of facial asymmetry and complications that may progress over time—such as hypertonus of mimic muscles up to contractures, synkinesias, and others. Pathological synkinesias are involuntary simultaneous contractions of one muscle group (или активация функции железы) in response to the voluntary contraction of another unrelated muscle group. Their development is based on mechanisms associated with the severity of facial nerve damage, such as aberrant regeneration, the "cross-talk" (vertical fibers) mechanism, ephaptic transmission, facial nerve nucleus reorganization, cerebral cortex reorganization, and "latent circuit activation." When designating synkinesias, the "triggering" muscle is indicated first, followed by the "responding" muscle. The most common are oculo-malar and oculo-oral synkinesias (more than 90% of all cases; forceful eye closure results in deepening of the nasolabial fold and twitching of the upper lip), oro-ocular synkinesias (59%; narrowing of the palpebral fissure when pouting the lips), the "crocodile tears" syndrome (lacrimation from the eye on the affected side during chewing), and others [53,54]. The combination of multiple synkinesias is referred to as post-paralytic hemispasm.
When performing reinnervation surgeries, associated movements may be caused by the involvement of the recipient nerve (hypoglossal, masseter, etc.), which is also referred to as post-paralytic hemispasm [55].
1.2.2.3. Facial myokymia
Facial myokymia, depending on the etiology, can be primary or secondary. Primary facial myokymia occurs as a result of physical or emotional overexertion, caffeine consumption, etc. In such cases, the condition is benign, is not a disease, and resolves spontaneously after eliminating the adverse factor [16]. In cases of a continuous course, diagnostic evaluation is required to identify the cause of secondary (symptomatic) facial myokymia. The symptom can be a side effect of medications (e.g., topiramate [56], gabapentin [57]), as well as an early sign of conditions such as multiple sclerosis [58], brainstem space-occupying lesions [16], vestibular schwannoma [59], and autoimmune diseases such as thyrotoxicosis.
1.2.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
The pathogenesis of cranial neuropathy may be based on any damage to a cranial nerve due to compression, autoimmune inflammation, or leptomeningeal involvement of the cranial nerves resulting from an oncological or inflammatory process [18].
Based on etiology, glossopharyngeal neuralgia is classified into classical, secondary, and idiopathic. Thus, the following causes of the disease can be distinguished: for the classical etiology – neurovascular conflict (NVC); for the secondary etiology – an underlying disease (neck trauma, multiple sclerosis, tonsillar or regional tumors, cerebellopontine angle tumor, and Chiari malformation); and for the idiopathic etiology – neither NVC nor an underlying disease is diagnosed [1]. Glossopharyngeal neuropathy, including its painful form, is a secondary manifestation of another disease (e.g., trauma, tumor). Damage to the olfactory nerve, oculomotor nerves, and caudal group nerves is considered a manifestation of another disease (cerebrovascular accident, head and neck trauma, dural venous sinus thrombosis, inflammatory diseases of the paranasal sinuses, head and neck tumors, systemic and metabolic diseases, ocular and bulbar forms of myasthenia gravis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, vascular malformations).
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
1.3.1 Trigeminal nerve disorders
1.3.1.1 Trigeminal neuralgia
The prevalence of TN is 0.03–0.3% [60], and the disease most commonly develops in older age groups.
1.3.1.2 Atypical facial pain
Persistent idiopathic facial pain – the prevalence of persistent idiopathic facial pain is unknown. Observations [61] indicate that 60–70% of patients with this form of prosopalgia are middle-aged women. In specialized pain centers, patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain are encountered somewhat more frequently than patients with trigeminal neuralgia. A large epidemiological study [62] involving 34,242 patients treated by dentists showed that chronic facial pain is observed in 5.2%. Among patients with chronic facial pain, persistent idiopathic facial pain was noted in 5.8% of cases and was among the top three most frequent causes of chronic prosopalgia. Risk factors for developing persistent idiopathic facial pain include a history of widespread pain syndrome, genetic predisposition, female sex, and passive coping strategies [63].
Myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm: prevalence is unknown.
Burning mouth syndrome – a 1999 study showed that BMS is most frequently diagnosed in middle-aged women. Factors associated with BMS most commonly include subjective dry mouth, taste disturbances, depression, and anxiety [27].
1.3.1.3. Other disorders of the trigeminal nerve, trigeminal nerve disorder, unspecified
The prevalence of neuropathic pain ranges from 3% to 18% in the population. Risk factors include older age, female sex, unemployment, and low educational level [29].
The risk of developing trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia in patients with acute herpetic infection is 5–20%. The risk increases with age, approaching 30% in the patient group over 80 years of age [10,64,65].
1.3.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Cluster headache
Cluster headache is the most frequent type of headache among trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias; however, it is significantly less common than migraine. The prevalence of cluster headache is approximately 1 per 1,000 individuals. Cluster headache affects men more frequently, with a male-to-female ratio of 4.3:1. Disease onset typically occurs between the ages of 20 and 29 years, although it can begin at any age. In women, onset is more common after the age of 50.
Paroxysmal hemicrania
The prevalence of paroxysmal hemicrania is 1 per 50,000 population, making it significantly rarer than cluster headache (1–3% of the number of patients with cluster headache). Paroxysmal hemicrania is significantly more frequent in women. The female-to-male ratio for this condition is 7:1.
Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing
SUNCT and SUNA are rare disorders with an incidence of 6.6 per 100,000 population [1].
Hemicrania continua
The true incidence of the disease remains unknown, although some authors consider hemicrania continua to be not so rare; approximately 200 cases of this condition have been described in the world literature over 30 years. There is a predominance of women, with a ratio of 1 man to 1.6 women for hemicrania continua [1].
1.3.2 Facial nerve disorders
1.3.2.1. Facial nerve neuropathy
According to a study based on data from the Unified Medical Information and Analytical System, the incidence of facial nerve neuropathy (Table 1) in Moscow for 2019 was determined across adult and child/adolescent age groups (number of initial cases per 100,000 population) [66]. Overall, the obtained data refine the statistics of the epidemiological indicators presented previously.
Table 1. Incidence of facial nerve neuropathy
Diagnosis | Adults | Children and adolescents |
Bell's palsy | 15,5 | 9,6 |
Geniculate ganglionitis | 0,6 | 0,2 |
Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome | 0,1 | 0,0 |
Other facial nerve disorders | 8,2 | 7,2 |
Facial nerve disorder, unspecified | 5,5 | 4,6 |
Bell's palsy (idiopathic form) has an incidence of 8 to 32 cases per 100,000 population per year, occurring with equal frequency in men and women, predominantly between the ages of 40 and 60 [36–39]. The incidence of Bell's palsy in pregnant women is 0.05%, with 2/3 of these cases developing in the third trimester of pregnancy [67,68]. The average recurrence rate of facial nerve neuropathy is 6.5%, of which 66% achieve recovery; the side of recurrence does not affect recovery [69]. It should be noted that among all recurrent facial nerve neuropathies, ultimately only 77.4% are idiopathic, while the rest are symptomatic: Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome (7.5%), neurosarcoidosis (3.7%), traumatic neuroma (1.9%), Ramsay Hunt syndrome (1.9%), granulomatosis with polyangiitis (1.9%), neoplastic processes (5.7%), facial nerve schwannoma (3.7%), and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma to the deep lobe of the parotid gland (1.9%) [42].
Ramsay Hunt syndrome accounts for approximately 12% of all forms of facial nerve neuropathy [70,71] and 1.9% of recurrent facial nerve neuropathies [42].
Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome accounts for 0.8% of cases among all forms of facial nerve neuropathy [72] and 7.5% among recurrent facial nerve neuropathies [42]. Symptom onset occurs at 25–40 years of age, and it is twice as common in women.
Facial nerve schwannomas (neurinomas) — over 90% of these are intracranial tumors, while about 10% are extracranial tumors involving the peripheral portion of the facial nerve and located within the parotid salivary gland [73,74].
1.3.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
Hemifacial spasm (primary) has an incidence of 14.5 per 100,000 women and 7.4 per 100,000 men, with symptom onset at 40–79 years of age [75].
The incidence of secondary hemifacial spasm, including post-paralytic, has not been established. Pathological synkinesias develop in up to 55% of cases after idiopathic facial nerve neuropathy [54,76], and in 28.2% after reinnervation surgeries [77]. Some authors believe that synkinesias of varying severity develop in all patients with incomplete recovery. The average time to development of synkinesias is 4 months from the onset of facial nerve neuropathy. Risk factors for developing synkinesias in patients with non-traumatic facial nerve neuropathy include the idiopathic form or infectious etiology, severe grade of involvement, and nerve electrical stimulation [53].
1.3.2.3. Facial myokymia
Facial myokymia (primary) affects healthy young individuals, more frequently women; its incidence has not been established [17].
1.3.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
The prevalence of glossopharyngeal neuralgia accounts for 1% of the prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia [78]. Glossopharyngeal neuralgia accounts for 0.2 to 1.3% of all types of cranial neuralgias [79,80].
The prevalence of other cranial nerve disorders (olfactory nerve, oculomotor and caudal cranial nerve groups) corresponds to the prevalence of the underlying conditions leading to involvement of these nerves.
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
1.4.1 Trigeminal nerve disorders
1.4.1.1 Trigeminal neuralgia
G50.0 – Trigeminal neuralgia
G50.1 – Atypical facial pain
1.4.1.3. Other trigeminal nerve disorders, unspecified trigeminal nerve disorder
G50.8 – Other disorders of trigeminal nerve
G50.9 – Disorder of trigeminal nerve, unspecified
G53.0 (B02.20) – Postherpetic trigeminal neuralgia
1.4.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
G44.0 (G50.8) – Cluster headache (episodic, chronic)
G50.8 – Paroxysmal hemicrania (episodic, chronic), SUNCT / SUNA (episodic, chronic), Hemicrania continua (remitting subtype, non-remitting subtype)
G90.0 – Probable trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (probable cluster headache, probable paroxysmal hemicrania, idiopathic peripheral autonomic neuropathy)
1.4.2 Facial nerve disorders
G51.0 – Bell's palsy
G51.1 – Geniculate ganglionitis (Ramsay Hunt syndrome)
G51.2 – Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome
G51.3 – Clonic hemifacial spasm
G51.4 – Facial myokymia
G51.8 – Other disorders of facial nerve
G51.9 – Facial nerve disorder, unspecified
1.4.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
G52.0 – Disorders of olfactory nerve
G52.1 – Disorders of glossopharyngeal nerve
G52.3 – Disorders of hypoglossal nerve
G52.7 – Multiple cranial nerve disorders
G52.8 – Disorders of other specified cranial nerves
G52.9 – Cranial nerve disorder, unspecified
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
1.5.1 Trigeminal nerve disorders
1.5.1.1 Trigeminal neuralgia
According to the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP) and the International Classification of Headache Disorders, trigeminal neuralgia is classified as follows [1,5]:
Classic trigeminal neuralgia,
Idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia,
Symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia.
In addition, type 1 and type 2 TN are distinguished according to the Burchiel classification [81]. Patients with type 1 TN experience only typical neuropathic paroxysms, whereas type 2 TN may also present with constant background pain in the innervation zone of the affected trigeminal branches.
1.5.1.2 Atypical facial pain
According to the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP), atypical (idiopathic) facial pain is classified as follows [5]:
Idiopathic orofacial pain
Burning mouth syndrome
Burning mouth syndrome without somatosensory changes
Burning mouth syndrome with somatosensory changes
Possible burning mouth syndrome
Persistent idiopathic facial pain
Persistent idiopathic facial pain without somatosensory changes
Persistent idiopathic facial pain with somatosensory changes
Possible persistent idiopathic facial pain
According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) [1]:
Painful cranial neuropathies and other facial pains
Burning mouth syndrome (BMS)
Persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP)
According to the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP) [5]:
Secondary myofascial orofacial pain
Myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm
Comments:
Persistent idiopathic facial pain without somatosensory changes – persistent facial pain with varying characteristics, recurring daily for more than 2 hours per day for more than 3 months, in the absence of clinically apparent neurological deficits or a preceding cause, not accompanied by somatosensory changes [5].
Persistent idiopathic facial pain with somatosensory changes – persistent facial pain with varying characteristics, recurring daily for more than 2 hours per day for more than 3 months, in the absence of clinically apparent neurological deficits or a preceding cause, accompanied by negative (hypoalgesia or hypesthesia) and/or positive (hyperalgesia or allodynia) somatosensory changes [5].
Possible persistent idiopathic facial pain – persistent facial pain with a varying clinical presentation, recurring daily for more than 2 hours per day for less than 3 months, in the absence of clinically apparent neurological deficits or preceding causes. After 3 months, the diagnosis is coded as persistent idiopathic facial pain (or one of its subtypes) [5].
Burning mouth syndrome without somatosensory changes – burning sensation or dysesthesia in the oral cavity, recurring daily for more than 2 hours per day for more than 3 months, without clinically apparent signs of an underlying disorder and without accompanying somatosensory changes [5].
Burning mouth syndrome with somatosensory changes – burning sensation or dysesthesia in the oral cavity, recurring daily for more than 2 hours per day for more than 3 months, without clinically apparent signs of an underlying disorder, and accompanied by negative and/or positive somatosensory changes [5].
Possible burning mouth syndrome – burning sensation or dysesthesia in the oral cavity, recurring daily for more than 2 hours per day for less than 3 months, without clinically apparent signs of an underlying disorder. After 3 months, the diagnosis is coded as burning mouth syndrome (or one of its subtypes) [5].
1.5.1.3. Other trigeminal nerve disorders, trigeminal nerve disorder, unspecified
Two classifications of trigeminal neuropathic pain are used. The diagnostic criteria and nosological structure do not contradict each other; there are minor differences in the naming of individual disorders.
I. International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP) [5]:
Other trigeminal neuropathic pain:
Trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with Herpes zoster
Trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia
Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain
Possible post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain
Trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with another disorder
Possible trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with another disorder
Idiopathic trigeminal neuropathic pain
II. International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) [1]:
Painful trigeminal neuropathy:
Painful trigeminal neuropathy attributed to Herpes zoster infection
Trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia
Painful post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy
Painful trigeminal neuropathy attributed to other disorder
Idiopathic painful trigeminal neuropathy
1.5.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Cluster headache
Episodic and chronic cluster headache are distinguished. The majority of patients (about 80%) suffer from episodic cluster headache
Episodic cluster headache – at least 2 cluster headache periods lasting from 7 days to 1 year per year, separated by a remission period of at least 3 months.
Chronic cluster headache – a type of cluster headache in which pain attacks persist for 1 year without remission or with remissions lasting less than 3 months.
Paroxysmal hemicrania
Episodic and chronic paroxysmal hemicrania (PH) are distinguished. In episodic PH, attacks occur for 7 days to 1 year, separated by a remission period of 1 month or more. In chronic PH, attacks last for more than 1 year without a remission period or with a remission period of less than 1 month. About 20% of patients suffer from episodic PH, and 80% suffer from chronic PH [1].
Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing
Episodic and chronic SUNCT are distinguished [1].
In episodic SUNCT, attacks occur for a period of 7 days to a year, separated by a remission period of 3 months or more.
In chronic SUNCT, attacks occur for more than 1 year without remission, or the remission period lasts less than 3 months.
Episodic and chronic SUNA are distinguished.
Episodic SUNA: attacks occur for a period of 7 days to 1 year, separated by a remission period of 3 months or more.
Chronic SUNA: attacks occur for more than 1 year without remission, or the remission period lasts less than 3 months.
Hemicrania continua
The following subtypes of hemicrania continua are distinguished [1]:
Remitting (with a remission period of at least 1 day without treatment),
Non-remitting (without a remission period of at least 1 day without treatment).
1.5.2 Facial nerve disorders

Figure 6. Classification of facial nerve disorders according to ICD-10
1.5.2.1. Facial nerve neuropathy
Facial nerve neuropathy is divided into idiopathic (G51.0) and symptomatic forms (G51.1, G51.2, G51.8, G51.9) [82], as well as lesions of individual branches of the facial nerve (G51.8) (Figure 6).
1.5.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
Hemifacial spasm is divided into primary (G51.3), secondary (symptomatic), and idiopathic (Figure 6) [15].
1.5.2.3. Facial myokymia
Facial myokymia is divided into primary (G51.4) and secondary (Figure 6).
1.5.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
According to the International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP), glossopharyngeal nerve disorders are classified as follows [5]:
I. Glossopharyngeal neuralgia:
Classical glossopharyngeal neuralgia;
Idiopathic glossopharyngeal neuralgia;
Secondary glossopharyngeal neuralgia.
II. Glossopharyngeal neuropathic pain:
Glossopharyngeal neuropathic pain attributed to an established cause;
Idiopathic glossopharyngeal neuropathic pain.
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
1.6.1 Trigeminal nerve disorders
1.6.1.1 Trigeminal neuralgia
The diagnosis of TN is established clinically based on a detailed analysis of the pain syndrome. To establish the diagnosis, certain clinical criteria according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders must be met [1]. The diagnosis of TN can be established in the presence of recurring paroxysms of unilateral facial pain in the innervation area of one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. The pain syndrome must exhibit the following semiological characteristics:
duration from a fraction of a second to 2 minutes;
severe intensity;
pain is electric shock-like, shooting, stabbing, or sharp;
presence of painless triggering (tactile, thermal, or dynamic) by stimulation of trigger points.
In rare cases, patients with a long history of pain syndrome show an increase in the duration of prosopalgia paroxysms to more than 2 minutes, primarily due to a serial pattern. In such situations, it is especially important to clarify the character of the pain and the presence of attacks triggered by dynamic, tactile, and thermal stimulation [1, 83]. Most patients report pain triggered by cold air, brushing teeth, washing, talking, or eating. During a standard neurological examination, this phenomenon may be elicited, although this is not always possible due to antalgic behavior.
Patients with TN should not exhibit sensory deficits during a neurological examination (with the exception of patients with symptomatic TN, who may show signs of trigeminal nerve irritation and damage) [1, 83, 84].
1.6.1.2 Atypical facial pain
Persistent idiopathic facial pain.
The main patient complaint is continuous pain, which may vary in intensity, but as a rule, does not occur in the form of attacks [5,85,86]. An important diagnostic criterion is the mismatch between the pain and the innervation zones of the trigeminal nerve branches. Most commonly, the pain is localized in the maxilla and may spread to the periorbital region, nose, cheek, temple, and mandible. In some patients, pain can spread to the head, neck, and even the arms. In some cases, pain is localized in a single tooth and is termed atypical odontalgia. Although pain persists throughout the day, it is typically absent at night; however, 50-70% of patients experience sleep disturbances [63]. In character, the pain is dull, deep, aching, and exhausting. Sometimes patients describe the pain as unbearable and agonizing, although in most cases the intensity is moderate, around 7 points on the VAS [3]. Unlike neuralgias, patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain do not experience attacks or lancinating pain, and trigger zones are absent. In some cases, patients note an intensification of pain that may resemble an attack; nevertheless, this does not exclude the diagnosis of persistent idiopathic facial pain. Pain exacerbation can be triggered by cold, psychological stress, as well as surgical and dental procedures [63]. Neurological examination reveals dysesthesia, paresthesia, or a subjective feeling of numbness in 60-75% of patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain, but objective sensory loss or other neurological symptoms are absent [4][86]. Quantitative sensory testing in patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain yields contradictory results: according to some researchers, it reveals no sensory impairments [87], while according to other authors, thermal hypoesthesia is detected in 45% and thermal allodynia in 10% [4]. Clinical somatosensory assessment using pinprick or light touch very rarely reveals mild somatosensory changes. A diagnosis of persistent idiopathic facial pain implies that quantitative sensory testing was not performed. If performed, one of two subtypes must be specified: Persistent idiopathic facial pain without somatosensory changes or Persistent idiopathic facial pain with somatosensory changes [5].
Myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm.
A sudden, involuntary, reversible tonic contraction of a muscle. The spasm can affect any masticatory muscle. It is characterized by a sudden onset of pain and limited jaw range of motion (in the case of jaw-closing muscle spasm, mouth opening is limited to <40 mm; for the lateral pterygoid muscle, ipsilateral movement is limited to <7 mm). Sometimes the patient describes a stepwise change in pain intensity [88].
Burning mouth syndrome.
An intense, chronic sensation of pain in the oral cavity. It is characterized by spontaneous burning pain occurring in the area of a visually normal oral mucosa, with normal clinical examination results and the absence of any identifiable local dental pathology. The pain is constant, its intensity varies from moderate to severe, often decreasing in the morning and increasing towards the evening, but only rarely disrupting sleep. Most commonly, the pain is localized in the tongue, but it can be felt anywhere on the mucosa. The pain is usually bilateral, although rarely it may occur unilaterally, and it does not correspond to the innervation zones of peripheral nerves. In addition, patients frequently complain of taste alterations or dry mouth despite normal salivation [7][6].
1.6.1.3. Other trigeminal nerve disorders, trigeminal nerve disorder, unspecified
The clinical presentation of neuropathic pain includes the following sensory symptoms [28].
I. Negative symptoms (hypoesthesia, anesthesia);
II. Positive symptoms (hyperalgesia, allodynia, hyperpathia, spontaneous pain or paresthesia).
Allodynia is one of the main positive symptoms of neuropathic pain, representing the occurrence of a pain sensation in response to a non-painful stimulus [28]. The following types of allodynia are distinguished [28]:
Mechanical (tactile) – occurs in response to mechanical stimuli – palpation, brush stroke;
Thermal – occurs in response to cold or warm stimuli;
Kinesigenic (movement-induced) – occurs in response to movement.
Neuropathic pain may be spontaneous (stimulus-independent) and/or induced (evoked, stimulus-dependent). Spontaneous pain may be superficial in the skin or deep. The duration of pain is prolonged or constant, sometimes paroxysmal. Constant superficial pain is usually stabbing, burning, cutting, or stinging in character; deep pain is spasmodic, dull, throbbing, or constricting. Paroxysmal pain is described as shooting, twitching, piercing, or like an electric shock. The intensity of neuropathic pain ranges from mild to excruciating [28].
Depending on the ongoing pathophysiological processes, various manifestations of neuropathy may predominate in the clinical picture (Table 3).
Table 3. Clinical symptoms and their underlying pathophysiological mechanisms [28].
Clinical symptoms | Pathophysiological mechanisms |
|---|---|
Continuous burning pain | Impaired central inhibitory control, central sensitization, ectopic discharges |
Shooting, piercing pain | Ectopic discharges |
Paresthesia or dysesthesia | Ectopic discharges, central sensitization |
Hyperalgesia | Central sensitization induced by enhanced nociceptive input |
Mechanical allodynia | Impaired central inhibition, central sensitization, nociceptor sensitization |
Paradoxical reactions to thermal stimuli | Impaired central inhibitory control |
Numbness, loss of sensitivity | Degeneration of all types of sensory fibers, impaired central inhibitory control |
Patients with trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia report pain with various characteristics, including deep, burning, continuous or paroxysmal, stabbing, or even diffusely piercing pain [89,90]. The pain is combined with paresthesia, dysesthesia, hyperalgesia, and pruritus. Chronic postherpetic neuralgia can have various phenotypes, for example, meeting the criteria for hemicrania continua or SUNCT, which can complicate diagnosis. Most patients with postherpetic neuralgia experience sensory loss and allodynia, although in rare cases thermal hyperalgesia and/or paresthesias may be observed. In addition, severe painless itching at the site of the rash is frequently reported.
1.6.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Cluster headache
Patients with cluster headache suffer from unilateral high- or very-high-intensity headache localized in the orbital, infraorbital, and temporal regions. A cluster headache attack most frequently occurs at night; due to the high intensity of the pain, the patient experiences motor restlessness and cannot find a place to stay, which distinguishes a cluster headache attack from a migraine attack. The pain is unilateral; in very rare cases, the pain can be bilateral. In a third of patients, the pain side can change from one attack to another; in the remaining patients, the pain side does not change. The duration of an attack ranges from 15 to 180 minutes.
During an attack, the following autonomic symptoms may occur:
lacrimation (91%);
conjunctival injection (77%);
nasal congestion (75%);
ptosis;
eyelid edema;
rhinorrhea;
forehead and facial sweating;
miosis;
facial flushing.
Autonomic symptoms resolve after the end of the cluster headache attack, but ptosis and miosis may persist outside the attack. Episodic and chronic cluster headache (see classification) can transform into one another, with transformation from chronic to episodic cluster headache being more common (30%).
Triggers for a cluster headache attack can include alcohol, vasodilators, sleep deprivation, pressure changes (air travel, scuba diving), weather changes, and certain odors.
Paroxysmal hemicrania
Patients suffer from high-intensity headache localized in the orbital region and accompanied by autonomic symptoms lasting from 2 to 30 minutes. Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks occur throughout the day, which also helps differentiate them from cluster headache. Most short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks occur spontaneously, about 10% of patients report the attack being triggered by neck movement, 7% by alcohol intake, and an even smaller number of patients note the onset of an attack against the background of stress or physical exercise [1].
Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing
Patients suffer from short attacks of unilateral pain in the orbital and periorbital region, within the innervation zone of the 1st branch of the trigeminal nerve, ranging from moderate to high intensity, burning, stabbing in character, or presenting as an electric shock sensation lasting from several seconds to minutes. Touching the skin can frequently act as an attack trigger.
SUNA attacks are more frequently localized to the temple and the V2 and V3 trigeminal nerve innervation areas. Autonomic symptoms commonly include lacrimation, nasal congestion, and rhinorrhea. Compared to SUNCT, spontaneous attacks are more common in SUNA. Another typical feature of SUNA is the absence of a refractory period, which distinguishes it from trigeminal neuralgia [1].
Hemicrania continua
Hemicrania continua is typically characterized by a unilateral headache localized in the temporal (82%), orbital (67%), frontal (64%), retroorbital (59%), or occipital (64%) regions. The pain is of moderate intensity with periodic exacerbations [1].
1.6.2 Facial nerve disorders
1.6.2.1. Facial nerve neuropathy
The clinical presentation of facial nerve disorders is varied and depends on the lesion level and severity. Motor disorders are always present, manifesting as nerve deficit or irritation symptoms, which can be primary or secondary, and of varying degrees of severity.
Facial neuropathy is characterized by deficit symptoms: unilateral prosoparesis (decreased muscle strength) or prosoplegia (absence of movement) of the facial muscles. Depending on the lesion level, in addition to motor impairments (prosoparesis/prosoplegia), additional symptoms are identified to help determine the lesion level (Table 4).
Table 4. Additional symptoms of facial neuropathy according to the lesion level
Level of lesion | Symptoms |
|---|---|
cerebellopontine angle | dysfunction of the trigeminal, abducens, and vestibulocochlear nerves |
internal acoustic meatus | dry eye, impaired taste on the anterior two-thirds of the tongue, dry mouth, ipsilateral hearing loss, dizziness |
in the bony canal proximal to the origin of the greater petrosal nerve | dry eye, impaired taste on the anterior two-thirds of the tongue, dry mouth, hyperacusis |
proximal to the origin of the stapedius nerve | lacrimation, impaired taste on the anterior two-thirds of the tongue, dry mouth, hyperacusis |
at the level of exit through the stylomastoid foramen | motor impairments and lacrimation only |
at the level of the salivary gland | motor impairments only |
involvement of individual branches | motor impairments only within the innervation zone |
The diagnosis of facial neuropathy must be based on a comprehensive assessment of clinical examination results (including history taking and complaints), MRI, and ENMG [91,92].
Bell's palsy (the idiopathic form of facial neuropathy) develops quite rapidly (within 24–48 hours), unlike facial neuropathy caused by a space-occupying lesion, for example. The maximum development time for symptoms in Bell's palsy is 72 hours [34]. Weakness limited to the lower group of facial muscles on one side may indicate a central lesion level [33,93] or involvement of individual branches [94]. In 6.5% of cases, Bell's palsy may recur [69]. However, a history of facial neuropathy casts doubt on the idiopathic etiology [42]. Hearing impairment in the form of increased sensitivity to sounds (hyperacusis), taste disturbance, or dry mouth characterizes a peripheral lesion level, specifically above the origin of the stapedius muscle [91]. Facial neuropathy should not be accompanied by ipsilateral hearing loss; a space-occupying lesion should be suspected [95,96]. Ear pain or retroauricular pain prior to or at the onset of asymmetry may be a symptom of idiopathic facial neuropathy [91,97] or a sign of an otogenic process.
Critical clinical symptoms ("red flags") indicating the need for further investigations and consultations in facial neuropathy:
symptoms progressing for more than 72 hours,
fluctuation in facial muscle paresis severity,
weakness limited to the lower group of facial muscles on one side,
history of facial muscle weakness episode,
involvement of facial muscles on both sides,
hearing loss,
dizziness,
presence of other neurological symptoms.
Idiopathic or non-traumatic symptomatic forms of facial neuropathy result in complete or partial recovery of facial nerve function within 3–6 months in 60–70% of cases [36,37,51,52]; however, due to the frequent development of complications, it should be considered a progressive disease requiring monitoring.
Unilateral prosoparesis or prosoplegia provokes increased tone in the muscles of the healthy side, leading to a shift in the facial midline [82,98,99]. Facial muscle hypertonus develops as early as the 7th day of the disease on the healthy side of the face in an average of 67% of patients, and in the absence of timely treatment – in over 90% of patients with incomplete facial nerve recovery or its absence [82]. Stretching of the weakened muscles on the affected side occurs, hindering the recovery of their function. In severe innervation impairment, muscle atrophy develops [100]. If nerve function begins to recover, an increase in muscle strength is accompanied by an increase in muscle tone on the affected side of the face, including the development of a pain syndrome [82,97]. Additionally, between 4 months and a year, their excessive activity appears – synkinesias [82,101].
Lagophthalmos — incomplete eyelid closure due to weakness of the orbicularis oculi muscle — occurs in 3/4 of patients of varying degrees of severity [102]. Upper eyelid malposition (retraction) and/or lower eyelid malposition (ectropion) may occur. Incomplete eyelid closure leads to xerosis of the anterior segment of the eyeball and its complications: keratitis, ulcer [82].
Primary motor impairments of facial neuropathy are:
decreased muscle strength on the affected side;
decreased muscle tone on the affected side;
lagophthalmos.
Secondary motor impairments of facial neuropathy are:
hypertonus or contractures of the facial muscles on the healthy or affected side;
muscle atrophy on the affected side;
synkinesias progressing to post-paralytic hemispasm of the affected side [82].
Risk factors for the development of contractures and synkinesias include:
severe nerve damage (clinically — prosoplegia, instrumentally — facial nerve involvement greater than 90% according to ENMG data)
active muscle stimulation (therapeutic exercise at maximum active movement amplitude, electrical stimulation) [82]. The success of recovery in facial neuropathy depends on identifying the risks of developing complications and implementing their prevention [82].
Isolated lesion of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve
Acute onset of smile asymmetry may be associated with involvement of just a single branch of the facial nerve, which outwardly also manifests as unilateral decreased muscle strength in the lower half of the face, and is therefore mistakenly interpreted as a central lesion. An isolated lesion of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve is common after dental interventions, cosmetic procedures, head and neck surgeries, trauma to the facial skeleton and adjacent soft tissues (exact statistics are unknown). The branch innervates the depressor anguli oris and mentalis muscles [94].
The standard neurological examination protocol detects muscle weakness but does not differentiate weakness of a specific muscle. A detailed clinical protocol with step-by-step testing of all facial muscles allows for the detection of pronounced smile asymmetry during the test when the patient is asked to say "Ee-Ee" [94].
1.6.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
Hemifacial spasm is characterized by motor symptoms of irritation — spontaneous unilateral clonic and/or tonic spasms of the facial muscles, i.e., a monosymptomatic paroxysmal hyperkinetic disorder. However, muscle spasm may be accompanied by clicking sounds in the ear (caused by contractions of the stapedius muscle) or neuropathic pain with features of trigeminal neuralgia [15]. The attack occurs at rest, sometimes even during sleep.
In a typical course of the disease, the spasm begins with rare contractions of the orbicularis oculi muscle, gradually progressing to involve the entire half of the face with closure of the palpebral fissure.
In an atypical course — the spasm begins with contractions of the cheek muscles, then spreads upward across the face [50].
With a prolonged disease course, facial muscle weakness (symptomatic facial neuropathy) may develop due to prolonged subclinical damage to the distal part of the facial nerve along with its hyperexcitability in the proximal sections [15]. Bilateral hemifacial spasm may occur, but accounts for less than 5% of cases.
1.6.2.3. Facial myokymia
Facial myokymia manifests as spontaneous, periodic, unilateral, self-limiting, low-amplitude, pulsating twitches in one of the facial muscles (most commonly the lower portion of the palpebral part of the orbicularis oculi muscle) lasting from a few seconds to a few hours, rarely up to a few weeks. These are more apparent to the patient than to others, are enhanced by voluntary movements, but are not initiated by them [17,59].
"Red flags" in facial myokymia:
twitches also in other facial muscles and/or body parts,
bilateral process,
eye opens with difficulty,
drooping eyelid,
redness or swelling of the eyelid,
pain,
symptoms do not resolve within several weeks.
presence of other neurological symptoms [17].
Differential diagnosis of involuntary facial movements is performed clinically based on complaints, medical history, and examination, distinguishing between facial myokymia, blepharospasm, facial paraspasm, synkinesia, tics, and epileptic seizures (Table 5). If somatic pathology, poisoning, or organic brain pathology is suspected, laboratory and instrumental diagnostics are required.
Table 5. Differential diagnosis of involuntary facial movements
Differential diagnosis | Distinguishing feature |
|---|---|
Facial myokymia | Occurs periodically, low-amplitude contractions in 1-2 muscles, self-limiting, the symptom is more obvious to the patient than to others |
Blepharospasm, facial paraspasm | Long-standing progressive, bilateral twisting movements, involving adjacent muscles |
Synkinesia | Occurs only with a specific movement, one muscle provokes the contraction of another |
Tics | Onset in childhood (3-7 years), progresses only until adolescence |
Epilepsy with eyelid myoclonia (Jeavons syndrome) | Eyelid myoclonia with or without absence seizures, bilateral eyelid trembling immediately after slow eyelid closure (eyes are never deviated to the side) |
1.6.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
The diagnosis is established clinically based on a neurological examination.
Symptoms of olfactory nerve lesion include decreased sense of smell (hyposmia), absence of sense of smell (anosmia), and heightened sense of smell (hyperosmia) [103].
Lesions of the oculomotor group of cranial nerves (oculomotor, trochlear, and abducens) include motor and autonomic manifestations: upper eyelid ptosis, divergent or convergent strabismus, diplopia, changes in pupil size on the affected side, impaired convergence and accommodation, and impaired conjugate movements of the eyeballs in any direction [103].
Glossopharyngeal nerve lesions include neuralgia and neuropathy. Glossopharyngeal neuralgia presents as paroxysmal, electric shock-like pain in the posterior part of the tongue, tonsil, pharynx, or angle of the lower jaw and/or ear, as well as in the auricular and pharyngeal branches of the vagus nerve. Glossopharyngeal neuropathy includes taste disorders in the posterior third of the tongue and decreased sensitivity in the upper half of the pharynx. Painful glossopharyngeal neuropathy manifests as constant or near-constant pain in the innervation area of the glossopharyngeal nerve, with or without short paroxysms [1].
Vagus nerve lesions are rarely isolated, more often occurring together with other cranial nerves of the caudal group. Lesions of the peripheral motor fibers of the vagus nerve lead to paresis of the pharyngeal and vocal cord muscles, manifested by swallowing disorders (dysphagia), hoarseness (dysphonia), and speech slur (dysarthria). Manifestations of impaired cardiac innervation by the vagus nerve include changes in heart rate (tachy- and bradycardia), with symptoms being mild in unilateral lesions. In bilateral vagus nerve lesions, respiratory rhythm disturbances are also noted.
Accessory nerve lesions result in head deviation toward the affected side, while head rotation toward the healthy side is sharply limited and shoulder elevation is impaired. Long-term accessory nerve lesion leads to atrophy of the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles. In bilateral lesions, the head is tilted back, and head rotation is impossible. Irritation of the accessory nerve causes tonic spasms of the muscles innervated by the accessory nerve [103].
Peripheral hypoglossal nerve lesions result in paresis of the ipsilateral half of the tongue; persistent impairment leads to atrophy of the muscles of half of the tongue and fibrillary twitching (in nuclear lesions). When protruded, the tongue deviates toward the affected muscle. Bilateral hypoglossal nerve lesions cause tongue paresis (glossoplegia), rendering the tongue immobile, speech slurred (dysarthria), or absent (anarthria). In central hypoglossal nerve lesions, the tongue deviates to the side opposite to the lesion focus upon protrusion [103].
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Trigeminal nerve lesions
Trigeminal neuralgia
Diagnosis of TN is based on the evaluation of clinical presentation (Appendix B1) [1]. The presence of neurovascular conflict according to brain MRI is not a basis for diagnosing classic TN.
Atypical facial pain
Diagnostic criteria for persistent idiopathic facial pain [5]:
Persistent idiopathic facial pain
A. Facial pain meeting criteria B and C.
B. Recurs daily for more than 2 hours per day for more than 3 months
C. Pain has all of the following characteristics:
1) poorly localized and does not follow the innervation zone of a peripheral nerve
2) dull, aching, or nagging
D. Clinical or imaging evaluation reveals no pathology, and local causes have been excluded
E. Not better accounted for by another ICD-11 or ICHD-3 diagnosis
Persistent idiopathic facial pain without somatosensory changes
A. Facial pain meeting the criteria for persistent idiopathic facial pain.
B. Qualitative or quantitative testing reveals no somatosensory changes.
Persistent idiopathic facial pain with somatosensory changes
A. Facial pain meeting the criteria for persistent idiopathic facial pain.
B. Qualitative or quantitative testing reveals somatosensory changes.
Possible persistent idiopathic facial pain
Facial pain meeting the criteria for persistent idiopathic facial pain, except that it has lasted for less than 3 months
Comments: The diagnosis of "persistent idiopathic facial pain" implies that quantitative sensory testing was not performed. If performed, one of two subtypes must be specified: persistent idiopathic facial pain without somatosensory changes or persistent idiopathic facial pain with somatosensory changes.
Diagnostic criteria for orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm [5]:
A. Myofascial pain meeting the criteria for secondary myofascial orofacial pain and criterion C below.
B. Muscle spasm diagnosed in one or more masticatory muscles.
C. At least two of the following characteristics demonstrating a causal relationship:
1) myofascial pain develops in close temporal association with the onset of the spasm;
2) myofascial pain significantly worsens in parallel with the progression of the spasm;
3) myofascial pain is significantly relieved or
ceases in parallel with the relief or resolution of the spasm.
D. Not better accounted for by another ICOAP diagnosis.
Comments:
Diagnostic criteria for secondary myofascial orofacial pain:
A. Myofascial pain in any masticatory muscle meeting criteria C and D.
B. A condition known to be able to cause
myofascial pain has been diagnosed
C. Myofascial pain meets both of the following
characteristics:
1) occurs in the jaw, temple, ear and/or in front of the ear, meeting
both of the following criteria:
a) confirmed by examination in the affected muscles or tendons;
b) elicited by palpation of the affected muscle or tendon
and/or maximum passive or active mouth opening
2) triggered by mandibular movement, function, or parafunction (e.g., teeth grinding or clenching).
D. A causal relationship with the underlying disorder is established.
Diagnostic criteria for burning mouth syndrome [5]:
A. Oral pain fulfilling criteria B and C.
B. Recurs daily for more than 2 hours per day for more than 3 months
C. Pain has all of the following characteristics:
1) burning character;
2) perceived superficially in the oral mucosa.
D. The oral mucosa has a normal appearance,
and local or systemic causes have been excluded.
E. Not better accounted for by another ICD-11 or ICHD-3 diagnosis
Other disorders of trigeminal nerve, trigeminal nerve disorder, unspecified
The diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathic pain is based on clinical manifestations of neuropathic pain, documented history of trigeminal nerve injury, and, when necessary, laboratory or instrumental confirmation.
Table 6. Diagnostic criteria for specific forms of trigeminal neuropathic pain [5]. Trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with Herpes zoster.
A. Unilateral facial pain in the distribution of one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve, lasting less than 3 months |
|---|
B. One or more of the following criteria: 1) herpetic rash located in the area supplied by the affected trigeminal nerve; 2) Varicella zoster virus detected in the cerebrospinal fluid by polymerase chain reaction; 3) positive direct immunofluorescence assay for Varicella zoster virus antigen or polymerase chain reaction for Varicella zoster virus DNA in cells obtained from the base of the lesions. |
C. Not better accounted for by another ICHD or ICHD-3 diagnosis. |
Comment: In rare cases, pain occurs without herpetic rash (zoster sine herpete). The diagnosis in such cases is confirmed by the detection of Varicella zoster virus DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid using polymerase chain reaction.
Table 7. Diagnostic criteria for specific forms of trigeminal neuropathic pain [5]. Trigeminal post-herpetic neuralgia (previously used term: post-herpetic trigeminal neuropathy).
A. Unilateral facial pain in the distribution of one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve, persisting or recurring for more than 3 months, and fulfilling criterion C. |
|---|
B. Herpes zoster infection has affected the same branches of the trigeminal nerve. |
C. Close temporal relationship between the pain and the Herpes zoster infection1 |
D. Not better accounted for by another ICHD or ICHD-3 diagnosis. |
Note 1: pain usually develops while active rashes persist, but sometimes also after they have healed. In such cases, pale or light purple scars may remain as sequelae of the herpetic eruptions.
Table 8. Diagnostic criteria for specific forms of trigeminal neuropathic pain [5]. Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain (previously used terms: anaesthesia dolorosa, painful post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathy).
A. Pain in the distribution of the trigeminal nerve, persisting or recurring for more than 3 months and fulfilling criteria C and D. |
|---|
B. Both of the following criteria: 1) history of mechanical, thermal, radiation, or chemical injury to the trigeminal nerve; 2) trigeminal nerve lesion confirmed1 by diagnostic tests that explain the pain2. |
C. Pain developed no later than 6 months after the nerve injury3 |
D. Associated with somatosensory symptoms4 in the same trigeminal distribution |
E. Not better accounted for by another ICD-11 or ICHD-3 diagnosis |
Notes:
This includes intraoperative or neuroimaging confirmation of compression or other trigeminal nerve lesion, nerve conduction studies, evoked potentials, or skin biopsy data confirming reduced nerve terminal density, as well as corneal reflex assessment. Such studies are essential for determining the cause of pain, but must always be evaluated in conjunction with clinical findings.
The degree of nerve injury may range from mild to severe and may be associated with direct trauma or iatrogenesis related to dental treatment: local anesthetic injections, root canal treatment, tooth extraction, and other oral surgical procedures.
In cases of radiation injury to postganglionic fibers, pain may occur more than 3 months after exposure.
Somatosensory (neurosensory) symptoms may be negative (e.g., hypoesthesia and/or hypoalgesia) and/or positive (e.g., hyperalgesia and/or allodynia). Note that positive somatosensory symptoms are not specific to neuropathy. The presence of negative or positive somatosensory symptoms in the area of pain serves as a reliable sign of trigeminal nerve lesion. The clinical examination is supplemented by laboratory tests such as quantitative sensory testing.
Comment: the diagnosis of Possible post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain is made based on the diagnostic criteria for Post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain without criterion B2.
Table 9. Diagnostic criteria for specific forms of trigeminal neuropathic pain [5]. Trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with another disorder.
A. Pain in the distribution of one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve, persisting or recurring for 3 months or more and fulfilling criteria C and D. |
|---|
B. A disorder known to be capable of causing such trigeminal neuropathic pain has been diagnosed, excluding causes for post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain and trigeminal neuropathy associated with Herpes zoster. |
C. Pain developed after the onset of the presumed disorder or led to its discovery. |
D. Presence of somatosensory symptoms1 in the area of pain |
E. Not better accounted for by another ICHD or ICHD-3 diagnosis. |
Note:
Somatosensory symptoms may be negative (e.g., hypoesthesia and/or hypoalgesia) and/or positive (e.g., hyperalgesia and/or allodynia).
Comment: the diagnosis of Possible trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with another disorder does not meet the criteria for Trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with another disorder.
Table 10. Diagnostic criteria for specific forms of trigeminal neuropathic pain [5]. Idiopathic trigeminal neuropathic pain.
A. Pain in the distribution of one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve, persisting or recurring for 3 months or more and fulfilling criterion C. |
|---|
B. Both of the following criteria:
|
C. Pain is associated with somatosensory symptoms1 in the distribution of the same trigeminal branches |
D. Not better accounted for by another ICHD or ICHD-3 diagnosis |
Note:
Somatosensory symptoms may be negative (e.g., hypoesthesia and/or hypoalgesia) and/or positive (e.g., hyperalgesia and/or allodynia).
Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Diagnosis is based on characteristic complaints and patient history (Appendix B4, Appendix B5). The criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) are used to establish the diagnosis [1].
Cluster headache
Diagnosis of cluster headache [1]:
A. At least 5 attacks fulfilling criteria B–D
B. Severe or very severe unilateral orbital, supraorbital, and/or temporal pain lasting 15 to 180 min (untreated)
C. One or both of the following:
At least one of the following symptoms or signs on the side of the headache:
a. conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation;
b. nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhea;
c. eyelid edema;
d. forehead and facial sweating;
e. miosis and/or ptosis.
Feeling of restlessness or agitation
D. Occurs with a frequency ranging from 1 every 2 days to 8 attacks per day.
C. Not better accounted for by another ICHD-3 diagnosis.
Outside of attacks, physical examination is typically unremarkable, though some patients may exhibit persistent ptosis and miosis.
Paroxysmal hemicrania
The following criteria from the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) are used for the diagnosis:
A. At least 20 attacks fulfilling criteria B–E
B. Severe unilateral orbital, supraorbital, and/or temporal pain lasting from 2 to 30 minutes
C. One or both of the following:
At least one of the following symptoms or signs on the side of the headache:
a. conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation;
b. nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhea;
c. eyelid edema;
d. forehead and facial sweating;
e. miosis and/or ptosis.
Feeling of restlessness or agitation
D. Occurs with a frequency of > 5 attacks per day.
E. Absolute prevention by therapeutic doses of indomethacin.
F. Not better accounted for by another ICHD-3 diagnosis [1].
Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing
Brief diagnostics for Short-lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform Headache attacks with Conjunctival injection and Tearing (SUNCT syndrome) [1]:
A. At least 20 attacks fulfilling criteria B–D
B. Moderate or severe unilateral headache in the orbital, suborbital, temporal region and/or other trigeminal distribution, lasting from 1 to 600 seconds as a single stab, a series of stabs, or having a sawtooth pattern [1].
C. At least one of the following autonomic symptoms or signs ipsilateral to the headache:
a. conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation;
b. nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhea;
c. eyelid edema;
d. forehead and facial sweating;
e. miosis and/or ptosis.
D. Occurs with a frequency of at least once a day.
C. Not better accounted for by another diagnosis from the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3) [1].
Diagnosis of short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing – SUNA syndrome [1]:
A. Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks fulfilling the criteria for chronic or episodic SUNA (see item 1 or 2 below):
Episodic SUNA: attacks occur in periods ranging from 7 days to 1 year, separated by remission periods of 3 months or longer.
Chronic SUNA: attacks occur for more than 1 year without remission, or with remission periods lasting less than 3 months.
B. Not more than one of the following ipsilateral to the pain:
conjunctival injection
lacrimation
Hemicrania continua
Diagnosis of hemicrania continua [1]:
A. Unilateral headache fulfilling criteria B–D
B. Present for > 3 months with exacerbations of moderate to high intensity.
C. One or both of the following:
At least one of the following symptoms or signs on the side of the headache:
a. conjunctival injection and/or lacrimation;
b. nasal congestion and/or rhinorrhea;
c. eyelid edema;
d. forehead and facial sweating;
e. hyperemia, burning sensation in the forehead and facial region
f. feeling of fullness in the ear
e. miosis and/or ptosis.
Feeling of restlessness or agitation
D. Absolute efficacy of therapeutic doses of indomethacin.
C. Not better accounted for by another diagnosis from the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3)
Facial nerve disorders
Generally accepted clinical and instrumental diagnostic criteria for facial nerve disorders have not been established. The diagnosis is made based on characteristic complaints, medical history, physical examination, and instrumental findings.
In facial neuropathy, the diagnostic goal is to determine the level of the facial nerve lesion and the cause (etiology), assess the severity, and predict the recovery dynamics.
Disorders of other cranial nerves
The diagnosis of TN is clinical and based on the characteristics of the pain syndrome (Appendix B3) [1,79]. The presence of neurovascular conflict on brain MRI is not a basis for the diagnosis of classical TN.
Diagnosis of olfactory nerve, oculomotor, and caudal group nerve disorders is based on patient complaints and neurological examination findings, and involves identifying the underlying disease that caused the lesion of the specified cranial nerves (see the etiology section).
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
2.1.1. Trigeminal nerve disorders
2.1.1.1. Trigeminal neuralgia
Complaints and medical history are described in the section "Clinical Presentation".
2.1.1.2. Atypical facial pain
Complaints and medical history are described in the section "Clinical Presentation".
When taking the medical history, it is important to pay attention to "red flags" that may indicate a secondary etiology [104,105]:
Sudden onset of pain.
Fever, rash, meningeal signs.
Pain aggravated by changes in body position, physical activity, coughing, or sneezing.
Progressive nature of the pain.
Pain resistant to adequately prescribed therapy.
Pain first occurring at an age over 50 years.
Changes in neurological status.
Unexplained weight loss, hyperhidrosis.
History of cancer.
History of immunodeficiency state, history of long-term glucocorticosteroid use.
It is recommended to perform a clinical diagnosis based on the specific clinical manifestations of atypical facial pain and the compliance of the clinical picture with the diagnostic criteria according to the latest version of the International Classification of Orofacial Pain [5].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: The International Classification of Orofacial Pain, approved by the International Headache Society and the International Association for the Study of Pain, is the primary diagnostic tool for any forms of headache and facial pain (Appendix B2).
2.1.1.3. Other trigeminal nerve disorders, unspecified trigeminal nerve disorder
Complaints are described in the "clinical presentation" section.
Medical history is described in the "disease etiology" section.
It is recommended to take the history and record complaints regarding peripheral and central nervous system and brain pathologies, with a clinical assessment of pain characteristics and sensory disturbances in the face, in all patients presenting with pain in the distribution of the trigeminal nerve branches to diagnose neuropathy [28].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments:
Confirmation of the neuropathic nature of pain is carried out using questionnaires that have undergone Russian-language linguistic adaptation and validation – DN-4, painDETECT, the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale (LANSS).
Depending on the damaging factor, a specific form of trigeminal neuropathic pain should be determined in accordance with the diagnostic criteria of the latest version of the International Classification of Orofacial Pain or the International Classification of Headache Disorders (tables 6-10).
2.1.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Complaints and medical history are described in the "clinical presentation" section.
2.1.2. Facial nerve disorders
2.1.2.1. Facial nerve neuropathy
Complaints and medical history are described in the "Clinical presentation" section. Features of taking complaints and medical history:
It is recommended to actively collect the medical history and complaints regarding peripheral nervous system pathology (including epidemiological history data) in all patients with facial asymmetry due to unilateral facial muscle weakness in order to perform differential diagnosis, determine the central or peripheral level of the lesion, and establish the etiology of the disease [82,106,107].
GCR CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: It is necessary to clarify the duration of the disease and the rate of its development, the sequence of symptom onset, the presence of motor disorders in the form of weakness of the upper and lower groups of facial muscles on one half of the face, hearing impairment in the form of hyperacusis, taste disorders or dry mouth, ear pain or pain in the retroauricular region shortly before or at the time of asymmetry development; a history of trauma, surgeries, cosmetic procedures, or dental interventions; the presence of other diseases (hypertension, diabetes mellitus), including neurological ones; pregnancy; elevated body temperature; enlarged lymph nodes; redness or swelling of the head and neck tissues; rashes on the skin of the face, parotid region, or inside the auricle; and travel to endemic regions (tick-borne encephalitis) within a month prior to symptom onset.
It is recommended to perform an expanded scope of clinical, laboratory, and instrumental examinations in patients with facial nerve neuropathy in the presence of "red flags" for the purpose of differential diagnosis [82].
GCR CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
2.1.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
Complaints and medical history are described in the section "Clinical Presentation".
2.1.2.3. Facial myokymia
Complaints and medical history are described in the section "Clinical Presentation".
2.1.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
Complaints and medical history are described in the "Clinical presentation" section.
2.2 Physical Examination
2.2.1. Trigeminal nerve disorders
2.2.1.1. Trigeminal neuralgia
It is recommended to perform an initial neurological consultation with visual examination for peripheral nervous system pathology, testing of sensory and motor spheres for peripheral nervous system pathology, with targeted assessment of sensory disturbances in the projection of trigeminal nerve branches, palpation for peripheral nervous system pathology with bimanual examination of the masticatory muscles to assess pain provocation by non-painful stimuli acting on trigger points, in order to exclude symptomatic TN, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, and myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm [1,83].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
2.2.1.2. Atypical facial pain
Clinical diagnostics of all forms of atypical facial pain includes a neurological examination, as well as an assessment of somatic and local status.
It is recommended to perform a neurological examination to identify potential causes of secondary facial pain and additional diagnostic workup to search for specific causes of the disease if the patient presents with "red flag" warning symptoms [105].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to evaluate the local, somatic, and neurological status in all patients with atypical facial pain in order to exclude organic pathology and a potential symptomatic nature of the facial pain [4, 7, 20, 26, 86, 108].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: When examining the neurological status, 60–75% of patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) may present with dysesthesia, paresthesia, and a subjective sensation of numbness, whereas objective sensory loss or other neurological symptoms are absent [4,86]. In burning mouth syndrome (BMS) and myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm, the neurological examination is likewise unremarkable. A comprehensive examination of the patient's head and neck region is recommended. Visual inspection of the head and neck should focus on skin lesions, skin discoloration, or localized edema. Palpation of lymph nodes and salivary glands should be performed to detect and rule out any palpable masses in this area [108]. Palpation of the facial muscles should be performed as follows: apply a pressure of 1 kg for 2 seconds to provoke pain at the palpation site, and a pressure of 1 kg for 5 seconds to elicit referred or radiating pain. Notably, palpation force is more significant than its duration for identifying pathology [5].
2.2.1.3. Other disorders of the trigeminal nerve, trigeminal nerve disorder, unspecified
It is recommended to perform a visual examination for peripheral nervous system pathology, an assessment of the sensory and motor spheres for peripheral nervous system pathology with a targeted evaluation of sensory disturbances in the projection of trigeminal nerve branches, an examination of the corneal reflex, and detection of facial skin depigmentation/pigmentation in all patients with suspected trigeminal neuropathic pain [1, 83].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
Comment:
It is advisable to assess sensory disturbances using questionnaires that have undergone Russian-language linguistic adaptation and validation – DN-4, painDETECT, the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs Pain Scale (LANSS);
An important role in establishing the diagnosis is played by assessing the dynamics of the pain syndrome and other sensory disturbances, especially following neuroablative procedures targeting the trigeminal ganglion or trigeminal nerve root;
In case of pain recurrence, the differences or stereotyped nature of pain paroxysms and other sensory changes should be taken into account to exclude new facial pain or a relapse of previously diagnosed facial pain.
It is recommended to perform palpation of the superficial temporal artery in all patients over 50 years of age with newly onset pain in the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve and episodes of amaurosis fugax associated with pain, in order to exclude headache attributed to giant cell arteritis [1] [109].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform palpation for peripheral nervous system pathology in the form of a bimanual examination of the masseter and temporal muscles in patients with a doubtful diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathic pain to exclude temporomandibular joint dysfunction [1, 83].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to conduct an initial neurological consultation with a visual examination for peripheral nervous system pathology, testing of the sensory and motor spheres for peripheral nervous system pathology with a targeted assessment of sensory disturbances in the projection of trigeminal nerve branches, and palpation for peripheral nervous system pathology with bimanual examination of the masticatory muscles to assess pain provocation by applying non-painful stimuli to trigger points, in order to exclude symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia, temporomandibular joint dysfunction, and myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm [1, 83].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
2.2.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
It is recommended to perform a neurological examination to exclude a secondary nature of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia [1].
Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 5Level of recommendation validity C (level of evidence reliability - 5).
2.2.2. Facial nerve disorders
2.2.2.1. Facial nerve neuropathy
Physical examination findings are described in the "Clinical Presentation" section. Physical examination features:
It is recommended to conduct an initial consultation (examination) by a neurologist, including a visual examination for peripheral nervous system pathology, palpation for peripheral nervous system pathology, and testing of the sensory and motor spheres for peripheral nervous system pathology, as well as palpation of the maxillofacial region (parotid salivary glands, lymph nodes) in all patients with facial asymmetry for differential diagnosis [37, 82, 107, 110, 111].
GCR CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to perform a visual examination of muscles, muscle palpation, assessment of static muscle strength, and assessment of dynamic muscle strength (for all facial muscles), including the recording of involuntary movements (synkinesias), in all patients who have developed facial asymmetry to determine the level and severity of the lesion [37, 82, 110, 111].
GCR CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: it is necessary to assess the presence, nature, and severity of motor disorders in the face, such as decreased muscle strength in the upper and lower groups of facial muscles, increased muscle tone on the conventionally healthy and/or affected side of the face, synkinesias, and deviation of the facial midline. Physicians assess the muscle strength of the lower third of the face in only 1/3 of cases, and insufficient attention is paid to assessing muscle tone and recording involuntary movements [112, 113]. To assess facial muscle strength, step-by-step testing should be performed: tests to evaluate the range of active movements (strength) of each facial muscle (Table 11) [94]. Muscle tone should be assessed visually and by palpation on both the healthy and affected sides, taking into account not only its decrease, but also its increase [82]. The presence of facial midline deviation is assessed both at rest and during movement, taking into account the direction of deviation – toward the affected or healthy side. Deviation of the facial midline indicates increased muscle tone [82]. To assess involuntary movements, the patient is given a series of instructions, and during each movement, it is evaluated which muscle contracts synchronously (Table 12). When designating a pathological synkinesia, the "provoking" muscle is indicated first, followed by the "responding" one. The most frequent are oculo-zygomatic (90%) and oro-ocular (59%) [53].
Table 11. Protocol for assessing the range of active movements of facial muscles [94].
Muscle examined | Patient instruction |
Frontal belly of the occipitofrontalis muscle | Raise your eyebrows up |
Corrugator supercilii muscle | Frown |
Orbicularis oculi muscle (palpebral part) | Gently close your eyes, |
Orbicularis oculi muscle (orbital part) | Squeeze your eyes shut |
Levator labii superioris, levator labii superioris alaeque nasi, zygomaticus minor muscles | Show your teeth ("bared teeth") |
Zygomaticus minor and major muscles | Close your lips and smile |
Buccinator muscle | Puff out your cheeks |
Risorius muscle | Part your lips and smile broadly |
Orbicularis oris muscle | Pucker your lips |
Depressor anguli oris muscle | Show a sad smile |
Depressor labii inferioris muscle | Lower your bottom lip, say: "E-E" |
Mentalis muscle | Lift your lower lip up |
Platysma | Say: "E-E" and tense your neck |
Table 12. Main patterns of pathological synkinesias [53]
Type of synkinesia | Clinical manifestation |
oro-ocular | narrowing of the palpebral fissure when "puckering the lips", "puffing out the cheeks", chewing |
oculo-frontal | wrinkling of the forehead during blinking, gentle eye closure, squinting |
oculo-zygomatic | contraction of the zygomatic muscle (deepening of the nasolabial fold) during blinking, gentle eye closure, squinting |
oculo-nasal | contraction of the nasalis muscle during blinking, gentle eye closure, squinting (this synkinesia can be physiological) |
Gunn synkinesia | the nasal ala elevates upward and outward during squinting |
oculo-oral | contraction of the nasolabial fold, zygomatic muscles, and upper lip occurs during blinking and squinting |
oculo-platysmal | squinting causes tension in the platysma |
oculo-auricular | involuntary elevation of the auricle during squinting |
fronto-nasal | raising the eyebrows causes contraction of the nasalis muscle |
fronto-oral | involuntary contraction of the corner of the mouth occurs when wrinkling the forehead |
Marin-Amat synkinesia | complete jaw opening or lateral jaw movement causes eyelid closure; a rare type of synkinesia |
"crocodile tears" syndrome | lacrimation from the eye on the affected side during chewing or lateral movements of the mandible |
oculo-stapedial | unilateral hearing loss or tinnitus occurs during blinking and eye closure |
sound-induced synkinesia | listening to key jingles, clapping, or trumpet sounds causes involuntary contractions of the facial muscles |
retroauricular pain | chronic pain in the retroauricular region occurring during menstruation after a prior episode of Bell's palsy |
It is recommended to assess symptom severity using the HB scale (Appendix G4) with recording of the results in medical documentation for subsequent dynamic follow-up of the patient using the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System (Appendix G5) in all patients with facial nerve neuropathy symptoms [114–117].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: The SB system is more comprehensive and sensitive for dynamically assessing facial nerve function in facial nerve neuropathy [118].
It is recommended to perform a visual eye examination – to assess the presence and severity of lagophthalmos in patients with facial nerve neuropathy for early prevention of lagophthalmos complications and timely referral to an ophthalmologist [102,119].
LE CQoE 4Level of Evidence C (Quality of Evidence – 4)
Comments: The patient is asked to close their eyelids without effort (close eyes gently), and then to squeeze them shut forcefully. During the tests, the completeness of eyelid closure is visually assessed, the distance in mm between the upper and lower eyelids is measured, the position of the upper and lower eyelids is then recorded separately, and the presence of conjunctival injection is visually assessed.
It is recommended to conduct a follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) with a neurologist within several months after the start of recovery in patients with idiopathic and symptomatic facial nerve neuropathy for the prevention and timely treatment of complications, including ophthalmological complications [115,120,121].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
2.2.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
Physical examination findings are described in the "Clinical Presentation" section. Physical examination features:
It is recommended to conduct an initial appointment (examination, consultation) with a neurologist, including a visual examination for peripheral nervous system pathology, palpation for peripheral nervous system pathology, sensory and motor function testing for peripheral nervous system pathology; as well as palpation of the maxillofacial region (parotid salivary glands, lymph nodes) in all patients with hemifacial spasm to perform differential diagnosis [122–124].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to conduct a visual examination of muscles, muscle palpation, assessment of the static strength of a single muscle, and assessment of the dynamic strength of a single muscle for all facial muscles, including the recording of involuntary movements, in all patients with hemifacial spasm to perform differential diagnosis [122–124].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: involuntary movements on one half of the face resembling tonic, clonic, or tonic-clonic muscle spasms develop at rest and may intensify during tests. Facial nerve paresis (prosoparesis) and muscle hypertonus on the affected side may be detected.
2.2.2.3. Facial myokymia
Physical examination findings are described in the "Clinical Presentation" section. Physical examination features:
It is recommended to conduct an initial appointment (examination, consultation) with a neurologist, including a visual examination for peripheral nervous system pathology, palpation for peripheral nervous system pathology, sensory and motor function testing for peripheral nervous system pathology; as well as palpation of the maxillofacial region (parotid salivary glands, lymph nodes) in all patients with facial myokymia to identify red flags [17,59].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to conduct a visual examination of muscles, muscle palpation, assessment of the static strength of a single muscle, and assessment of the dynamic strength of a single muscle for all facial muscles, including the recording of involuntary movements, in all patients with facial myokymia to identify red flags [17,59].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
2.2.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
It is recommended to perform a visual examination for peripheral nervous system pathology, sensory and motor function testing for peripheral nervous system pathology, and palpation for peripheral nervous system pathology in all patients with suspected facial nerve neuropathy to rule out a secondary etiology of the disease [1].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
2.3.1. Trigeminal nerve disorders
2.3.1.1. Trigeminal neuralgia
Specific laboratory diagnostics for trigeminal neuralgia have not been developed.
2.3.1.2. Atypical facial pain
Burning Mouth Syndrome
It is recommended for all patients with burning mouth syndrome to undergo laboratory diagnostic tests, including a complete blood count (CBC), a general clinical blood biochemistry panel including blood glucose levels, blood vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) levels, serum folic acid levels, total blood hemoglobin levels, serum iron levels, serum ferritin levels, serum transferrin levels, as well as total blood estradiol levels, blood estrone levels, total blood estriol levels, and blood progesterone levels to rule out a potential symptomatic etiology of burning mouth syndrome [7,125–128].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
Comments: nutritional deficiency, diabetes mellitus, and menopausal disorders are diagnosed through hematological assessment of nutritional status, blood glucose levels, and estrogen/progesterone concentrations, respectively. If laboratory evaluation reveals one or more of these systemic factors, such a patient should be considered as having secondary burning mouth syndrome, whereas the absence of these factors points to a definitive diagnosis of primary burning mouth syndrome [7].
2.2.1.3. Other disorders of the trigeminal nerve, trigeminal nerve disorder, unspecified
It is not recommended to determine antibodies to the varicella-zoster virus in the blood to confirm postherpetic trigeminal neuralgia [129].
GGR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation — B (Level of Evidence 3)
Comment: laboratory determination of antibodies to the varicella-zoster virus is of no major clinical significance due to its high prevalence in the population [130].
It is recommended to perform a set of tests to assess systemic inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP) in blood serum and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), in all patients over 50 years of age with newly onset pain in the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve and episodes of amaurosis fugax associated with pain, to rule out headache attributed to giant cell arteritis [109].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: diagnostically significant for giant cell arteritis is an ESR ≥ 50 mm/h or CRP ≥ 10 mg/L as part of other diagnostic criteria for the disease [109].
2.3.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Not required in case of a typical clinical presentation.
2.3.2. Facial nerve disorders
2.3.2.1. Facial nerve neuropathy
Laboratory diagnostics are aimed at determining the etiological factor and detecting the acute phase of the process.
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (CBC) in all patients with facial nerve neuropathy to exclude symptomatic forms of the disease, determine its severity, and prognosis for recovery [131].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: hemoglobin concentration, erythrocyte, platelet, and leukocyte counts are determined; a leukocyte formula shift towards neutrophils indicates an unfavorable prognosis.
It is recommended to perform a general clinical biochemical blood test, including fasting blood glucose testing, in all patients with facial nerve neuropathy in order to exclude symptomatic forms of facial nerve neuropathy [132–138].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: metabolic disorders (diabetes mellitus, liver or kidney dysfunction) are detected.
It is recommended to test the blood level of glycated hemoglobin in patients with facial nerve neuropathy suffering from diabetes mellitus to assess diabetes compensation due to the need to prescribe high doses of glucocorticoids to these patients [139].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to perform serological diagnostics at the onset of symptoms: determination of antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 in the blood; determination of antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 in the blood; determination of antibodies to herpes simplex virus in the blood; determination of antibodies to Varicella-Zoster virus in the blood; determination of antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to cytomegalovirus in the blood; determination of antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus in the blood; determination of antibodies to human herpesvirus 6 in the blood in patients with facial nerve neuropathy and suspected infectious etiology of the disease [34,140].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5Level of Evidence C (reliability of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform serological diagnostics at the onset of symptoms: determination of antibodies to tick-borne encephalitis virus in the blood in patients with facial nerve neuropathy and suspected tick-borne encephalitis [48,141–143].
GCR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to test the blood level of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in patients with facial nerve neuropathy to exclude thyroid pathology [144].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
Comments: hypothyroidism increases the risk of developing facial nerve neuropathy [138].
2.3.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (CBC) and a general clinical biochemical blood test, including fasting blood glucose testing, in all patients with facial nerve neuropathy to exclude secondary forms of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis [122–124].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: presence of inflammation and metabolic disorders is excluded.
2.3.2.3. Facial myokymia
In case of a typical disease course and absence of "red flags", laboratory diagnostics are not performed.
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (CBC) and a general clinical biochemical blood test, including blood glucose testing, in all patients with facial nerve neuropathy as part of routine general clinical testing and other laboratory diagnostics as indicated for patients with symptoms of facial myokymia in cases where "red flags" are identified, for the purpose of diagnosing secondary (symptomatic) forms [17].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
2.3.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
Specific laboratory diagnostics for cranial nerve lesions have not been developed.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
2.4.1. Trigeminal nerve disorders
2.4.1.1. Trigeminal neuralgia
It is recommended to perform routine brain magnetic resonance imaging with a 3D SPGR sequence in all patients with the clinical picture of TN to clarify the etiology of the disease and rule out mass lesions and demyelinating disease [145].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comment:
The names of the recommended sequences may vary depending on the manufacturer of the magnetic resonance scanner;
If a mass lesion, demyelinating disease, or other structural alterations (neurosarcoidosis, metastases, etc.) are suspected, contrast enhancement is indicated. The preferred slice thickness for the contrast sequence is up to 2 mm;
It is recommended to perform brain magnetic resonance imaging using the FIESTA + 3D TOF protocol in patients with the clinical picture of TN after ruling out a symptomatic etiology of the disease in cases of pharmacoresistance, intolerance, or decreased adherence to conservative treatment methods to confirm or rule out neurovascular conflict [146].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comment:
According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, neurovascular conflict is diagnosed when structural changes in the nerve root (dystopia, atrophy) are present;
The names of the recommended sequences may vary depending on the manufacturer of the magnetic resonance scanner;
The preferred slice thickness for the FIESTA (CISS, DRIVE) sequence is 0.4–0.6 mm;
For diagnosing structural changes in the trigeminal nerve root, scanners with a magnetic field strength of 3 T are preferred, but not less than 1.5 T.
It is recommended to perform additional diagnostic examinations (orthopantomography and CBCT, MRI of a single joint with targeted examination of the temporomandibular joints, ultrasound of the salivary glands, visual inspection and palpation of the muscles to rule out temporomandibular joint dysfunction) in patients with facial pain whose clinical picture does not meet the criteria for TN, in order to rule out other orofacial pain and TMJ dysfunction [147–150].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
Comment: the choice of additional diagnostic methods is determined by the clinical picture and preliminary diagnosis.
2.4.1.2. Atypical facial pain
Brain MRI is recommended for newly diagnosed atypical facial pain and when the patient has warning symptoms — "red flags" [105].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Persistent idiopathic facial pain
It is recommended for patients with an atypical clinical picture of facial pain, the presence of "red flags", or changes in neurological status to undergo brain magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance imaging of the soft tissues of the head, magnetic resonance imaging of the spine (one section) — the cervical spine with evaluation of bone structures, and magnetic resonance imaging of the neck to rule out symptomatic facial pain [20,26,151,152].
GIB CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Differential diagnosis of persistent idiopathic facial pain is carried out with a number of conditions: pain associated with cranial bone pathology, ear diseases, sinusitis, pathology of the jaws, teeth and surrounding tissues, temporomandibular joint pathology; cranial nerve pathologies such as trigeminal compression, diabetic oculomotor neuropathy, herpes zoster, postherpetic neuralgia, Tolosa-Hunt syndrome, cervical-lingual syndrome; trigeminal neuralgia; glossopharyngeal neuralgia; nervus intermedius neuralgia; neuralgia of terminal branches of cranial nerves; headache attributed to external pressure; cold stimulus headache; central post-stroke pain, intracranial tumors, oral cavity tumors [20,26,151,152].
It is recommended to perform quantitative sensory testing if sensory disorders are suspected [4,5,87].
GIB CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm
It is recommended for patients with suspected myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm (in case of insufficient clinical and anamestic data) to perform surface electromyography (one anatomical zone) [153].
GCR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendations — B (Level of Evidence — 3).
Comments: The study is performed only in cases where the diagnosis requires confirmation, for example, unilateral or atypical pain. The study can be performed using either surface or needle electrodes. In both cases, a sign of ongoing muscle spasm will be the recording of motor unit action potentials at rest within the projection of the muscles (or directly in the muscle if a needle electrode is used) [5,154].
2.4.1.3. Other disorders of the trigeminal nerve, unspecified trigeminal nerve disorder
If signs of trigeminal nerve compression are detected based on instrumental examination findings, a mandatory basis for diagnosing neuropathic trigeminal pain is the combination of the identified changes with the clinical presentation, i.e. topographic correspondence of the instrumental findings with the manifestations of neuropathy.
Routine brain MRI in standard modes is recommended for all patients diagnosed with Possible post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain, Possible trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with another disorder, and Idiopathic trigeminal neuropathic pain in order to clarify potential causes of clinical manifestations [155].
GRS CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation Strength C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments:
1. If intraoperative confirmation of trigeminal nerve injury or compression is available, additional instrumental diagnostic methods are not required;
2. If necessary, the study may be supplemented with contrast enhancement, an angiographic sequence (3D TOF), a fat-suppression sequence (FatSat), and others;
3. The preferred slice thickness for T1 and T2 sequences is up to 2 mm.
Short-latency trigeminal evoked potentials are recommended to be performed in patients diagnosed with Probable post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain, Possible trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with another disorder, and Idiopathic trigeminal neuropathic pain to assess trigeminal nerve conduction impairment as an additional diagnostic method [1,5,156].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: if another instrumental study or intraoperative visualization confirming damage or injury to the trigeminal nerve is available, an evoked potential study is not mandatory.
Quantitative sensory testing is recommended for patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to objectify sensory disturbances as an additional diagnostic method [1,5,28].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform orthopantomography, spiral computed tomography orthopantomography, cone-beam computed tomography and/or examination of the nasal sinuses (computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses, larynx / radiography of the paranasal sinuses) in patients diagnosed with Possible trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with another disorder, and Idiopathic trigeminal neuropathic pain to rule out odontogenic causes of the disease and inflammatory processes in the paranasal sinuses as the cause of the pain syndrome [157].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: for diagnosing odontogenic causes of the disease among radiological methods, CBCT is preferred; orthopantomography and targeted radiography can also be used. For diagnosing inflammatory diseases of the paranasal sinuses, CT or radiography can be used.
2.4.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Cluster headache
Contrast-enhanced brain MRI is recommended for patients with newly onset symptoms characteristic of cluster headache to rule out other causes of the symptoms (tumor, arteriovenous malformation, inflammatory brain diseases) [158–160].
Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 5Level of recommendation validity C (level of evidence reliability - 5).
Comment: If the nature of symptoms changes during attacks, the study must be repeated. In individual cases, in patients with an atypical clinical picture or newly onset symptoms over the age of 60, the following may be performed as indicated:
Computed tomography of the brain (CT of the skull base, if brain MRI cannot be performed);
General (clinical) cerebrospinal fluid analysis;
Duplex scanning of the intracranial segments of brachiocephalic arteries;
Magnetic resonance angiography of intracranial vessels (to rule out arteriovenous malformations or arterial dissection).
Differential diagnosis is carried out with the following conditions:
paroxysmal hemicrania;
short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing, SUNCT syndrome (episodic, chronic);
short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms, SUNA syndrome (episodic, chronic);
migraine;
temporal arteritis;
trigeminal neuralgia;
sinusitis;
glaucoma;
brain tumor;
arteriovenous malformation
acute cerebrovascular accident;
carotid or vertebral artery dissection [158–160].
Paroxysmal hemicrania
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced brain MRI in patients with newly diagnosed symptoms characteristic of paroxysmal hemicrania to exclude other causes of the symptoms (tumor, arteriovenous malformation, inflammatory brain diseases) [158–160].
Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 5Level of recommendation validity C (level of evidence reliability - 5).
Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing
It is recommended to perform a brain MRI in patients with newly onset SUNCT/SUNA attacks to rule to out focal brain lesions [161–163].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of evidence C (level of confidence of data - 4).
Hemicrania continua
It is recommended to perform a brain MRI in patients with hemicrania continua to rule out focal brain lesions [1].
Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 5Level of recommendation validity C (level of evidence reliability - 5).
2.4.2. Facial nerve disorders
2.4.2.1. Facial nerve neuropathy
Determination of the cause and localization of facial nerve lesions
Contrast-enhanced brain MRI, including the parotid gland, is the method of choice, as it allows assessment of the condition of the facial nerve along its length. The idiopathic form of facial neuropathy (Bell's palsy) is characterized (though not specifically) by contrast enhancement of the facial nerve on the side of clinical symptoms [164–166].
Emergency MRI is indicated for patients with an atypical clinical presentation of facial neuropathy and other neurological symptoms, including to rule out acute cerebrovascular accident [167]. In typical clinical presentations, emergency MRI is not advisable [168].
Elective MRI is performed even in patients with a typical clinical presentation of Bell's palsy [33]. In typical cases of facial neuropathy, space-occupying lesions are detected in 8–12% of cases, 30% of which are malignant [44]. An extended contrast-enhanced protocol is required [115]. In current clinical practice, MRI is performed in only 13% of cases, of which contrast-enhanced is used in every 4th–5th patient [112]. Because recommended MRI protocols vary, the study is often performed incorrectly, and the results do not allow differentiation between inflammatory and neoplastic processes, even when interpreted by experienced physicians [44,113].
International guidelines recommend performing contrast-enhanced MRI in all patients within 1 month of symptom onset [115]. While spontaneous nerve function recovery is possible in facial neuropathy, in 80% of patients (among all who recover), it occurs within the first 2–3 weeks [37]. It is advisable to order MRI in patients with a typical clinical presentation of Bell's palsy only if symptoms persist for more than 2–3 weeks, as well as in all patients with an atypical clinical presentation characterized by the presence of red flags.
Neurosonography is an emerging diagnostic method for cranial nerve lesions (including the facial nerve). It is rarely used in clinical practice, primarily in children [169].
It is recommended to urgently perform computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain in patients with an atypical clinical presentation of facial neuropathy (presence of other neurological symptoms) to exclude alternative causes, including acute cerebrovascular accident [167].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced brain MRI in patients with a clinical presentation of facial neuropathy if symptoms persist for more than 3 weeks to rule out space-occupying lesions, inflammatory or demyelinating processes, acute cerebrovascular accident, or neurovascular conflict [33,37,44,170,171].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: The study is performed using an extended protocol in patients with a typical clinical presentation of Bell's palsy if symptoms persist for more than 2–3 weeks, as well as in all patients with an atypical clinical presentation, specifically the presence of red flags. The most optimal combination of sequences is: T1 WI, T2 WI, FLAIR (with 1 mm slice thickness), DWI, 3D-TOF, steady-state free precession sequences (such as SSFP, FIESTA-C, CISS, FFE, etc.), magnetic field inhomogeneity-sensitive sequences (such as T2*, SWI, SWAN, etc.), and T1 WI after intravenous contrast enhancement [170,172]. Whenever possible, the protocol includes imaging of the extracranial segment of the facial nerve (MRI of the parotid gland – MRI of soft tissues with intravenous contrast) [171]. If brain MRI is not feasible, contrast-enhanced brain CT should be performed.
It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the temporal bone in patients with a clinical presentation of facial neuropathy if ENT pathology or temporal bone trauma is suspected [173,174].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: if temporal bone CT is not feasible, temporal bone radiography should be performed.
It is recommended to perform ultrasound of the salivary glands (parotid gland) in patients with facial neuropathy of undetermined etiology if symptoms persist for more than 3 weeks to rule out pathology (including a space-occupying lesion) in cases where a symptomatic form is suspected and MRI is difficult to perform [175,176].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Instrumental assessment of nerve function – grading severity
The key instrumental methods for assessing the severity of functional facial nerve damage are electroneuromyography (ENMG) and needle electromyography (EMG), which allow prediction of nerve function recovery for the timely identification of patients at risk of unfavorable outcomes and referral for surgical treatment [82,177].
ENMG assesses nerve impulse conduction along the nerve. The study should be performed no earlier than 8 days from the onset of symptoms [178]. An unfavorable prognosis for spontaneous recovery of facial palsy is indicated by an electrographic pattern where the amplitude of the M-wave on the affected side is ≥90% lower than the amplitude of the M-wave obtained from the homologous muscle innervated by the healthy facial nerve. In this case, to avoid false results due to impulse desynchronization caused by uneven de- and remyelination of facial nerve axons, EMG using a concentric needle electrode during attempted voluntary contraction of the corresponding muscle must be performed [178].
EMG evaluates muscle electrical activity—at rest (spontaneous) or during an attempted voluntary contraction of the muscle into which the bipolar concentric electrode is inserted. If nerve innervation of the muscle is preserved, motor unit potentials (MUPs) are recorded during voluntary contraction.
An M-wave amplitude asymmetry >90% combined with the absence of MUPs during attempted voluntary contraction is assessed by most authors as severe axonal degeneration of the facial nerve [33], an unfavorable prognosis of facial neuropathy, and, accordingly, as an indication for surgical treatment [177]. At the same time, the absence of MUPs during attempted voluntary muscle contraction may lack prognostic value until the 15th day from symptom onset [179]. Therefore, if they are absent, the study should be repeated dynamically.
It is recommended to perform single-nerve electroneuromyography (ENMG) in patients with severe facial neuropathy (grade V–VI according to the HB scale) no earlier than 8 days from symptom onset (most informative on days 9–20 of the disease) to assess the degree of nerve damage and determine the recovery prognosis [178].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: The study must be performed bilaterally, assessing at least the orbicularis oculi and orbicularis oris muscles, with the report indicating the percentage ratio of the M-wave amplitude obtained from the muscle on the affected side to the M-wave amplitude of the homologous muscle on the healthy side. An amplitude difference of more than 90% in at least one of the muscles indicates an unfavorable prognosis for spontaneous recovery of facial neuropathy, but requires EMG to detect subclinical myofibrillar contractions during voluntary contraction. The result determines the indications for surgical treatment (Appendix B8).
It is recommended to perform needle electromyography (single nerve) evaluating the presence of MUPs during attempted voluntary muscle contraction in muscles of the affected side, assessing at least two muscles innervated by the upper and lower branches of the facial nerve in patients with facial neuropathy and an M-wave amplitude asymmetry greater than 90% according to surface/stimulatory ENMG data, in order to rule out false-positive nerve conduction study results [82,179–183].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: The failure to record MUPs during voluntary contraction of the examined muscles indicates total damage to the facial nerve trunk and an unfavorable recovery prognosis. The orbicularis oculi and orbicularis oris muscles are the most convenient for examination.
It is recommended to perform needle electromyography (one nerve) with assessment of motor unit action potentials (MUAPs) during attempted voluntary contraction of a paretic muscle on the affected side within the innervation zone in patients with an isolated branch lesion. This method can be used to examine the muscles of the lower face innervated by the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve, which are inaccessible for surface ENMG evaluation [94].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: In cases of isolated paralysis of the muscles of the lower face within the innervation zone of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve, needle EMG was performed with recruitment of MUAPs during voluntary contraction of these muscles bilaterally, assessing the difference in maximum amplitudes of the interference pattern on the affected side relative to the healthy side to determine the degree of nerve injury and management strategy [94]. In traumatic injuries, MUAPs may appear only by the fourth month from symptom onset; therefore, follow-up serial studies are required [184].
It is recommended to perform follow-up needle electromyography (one nerve) at 6 months in patients with persistent severe facial neuropathy (House-Brackmann grade V–VI) to determine the need for surgical intervention [82,180–183].
GCR CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: The study can be repeated earlier—at 3 months from symptom onset in the absence of recovery and a history of nerve trauma. It should be noted that in some cases, with sequential combination therapy and rehabilitation, nerve function recovery is possible even with unfavorable ENMG predictors [185].
It is not recommended to perform motor nerve conduction study (one nerve) and needle electromyography (one nerve) in patients with incomplete facial nerve palsy (less than House-Brackmann grade IV) with preserved movements in all branch innervation zones for the purpose of determining the severity of nerve injury [177].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: The study is uninformative because clinical preservation of movements indicates a favorable prognosis for facial movement recovery and an absence of indications for surgical treatment. In this case, instrumental assessment of facial nerve function is not required. An exception is made for cases of isolated muscle weakness within the innervation area of a single branch [94].
Instrumental diagnostics of secondary movement disorders in facial neuropathy
It is recommended to perform soft tissue ultrasound (one anatomical zone) of the face in patients with facial neuropathy at $\ge$3 months from symptom onset and signs of severe nerve injury according to ENMG data to detect muscle atrophy and timely referral for surgical treatment [100].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
Comments: Chronic facial neuropathy was defined as a disease duration of more than 3 months. In patients with signs of denervation on ENMG on the affected side, ultrasound revealed a decrease in muscle volume (atrophy), and after reinnervation procedures, an increase (recovery).
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissues (face) in patients with facial neuropathy at $\ge$3 months from symptom onset and signs of severe nerve injury with suspected muscle atrophy for its quantitative assessment [186–188].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: In patients with total facial nerve palsy, denervated muscles rapidly undergo atrophy, making delayed surgical treatment potentially impractical. Monitoring muscle status is required for timely treatment. Since one of the main goals of surgical treatment is smile restoration, assessing the condition of the zygomatic muscles is of primary importance.
2.4.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
It is recommended to perform brain magnetic resonance imaging using an expanded protocol in all patients with clinical presentation of hemifacial spasm to detect neurovascular conflict [146].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comments: In HFS, the most optimal combination of sequences for identifying neurovascular conflict (NVC) is: 3D-T2 WI, 3D-TOF, and steady-state free precession sequences (such as SSFP, FIESTA-C, CISS, FFE, etc.), performed alongside a standard MRI protocol including T1 WI, T2 WI, FLAIR (with 1 mm slice thickness), DWI, and magnetic susceptibility-weighted sequences (such as T2*, SWI, SWAN, etc.), [189]. In some patients, NVC not identified at 1.5T showed better diagnostic visibility at 3T [190] The most common vessels causing compression are: the anterior and posterior inferior cerebellar arteries, the vertebral artery, the internal auditory artery, small arterioles, and veins; less commonly, compression is caused by venous developmental anomalies, arteriovenous malformations, dural arteriovenous fistulas, arterial aneurysms, and vertebral artery dissections. In most cases, the NVC zone is the nerve root exit zone from the brainstem (up to several mm). In typical HFS presentation, the NVC is located more distally, while in atypical cases, it is located on the rostral side or in the cisternal segment of the facial nerve root [189].
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with clinical presentation of hemifacial spasm in the absence of neurovascular conflict on non-contrast series to rule out a mass lesion and other alternative causes [122,123].
Level of Evidence CReliability of Evidence 5Level of Confidence C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform salivary gland ultrasound (parotid gland) in patients with hemifacial spasm of undetermined etiology [124].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: alternative imaging methods (MRI) may be performed.
2.4.2.3. Facial myokymia
In typical disease courses and the absence of "red flags", neuroimaging is not performed.
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with symptoms of facial myokymia in the presence of "red flags" to determine the cause of facial nerve damage [17].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is not recommended to perform brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with symptoms of facial myokymia in the absence of "red flags" [17].
Level of Evidence CReliability of Evidence 5Level of Confidence C (Level of Evidence – 5)
2.4.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
It is recommended to perform brain magnetic resonance imaging including the craniovertebral junction in standard modes with 3D SPGR in all patients with clinical manifestations of glossopharyngeal neuralgia to clarify the etiology of the disease [80].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment:
The names of the recommended sequences may vary depending on the manufacturer of the magnetic resonance scanner;
If indicated, routine brain MRI should be supplemented with intravenous contrast enhancement and a slice thickness of up to 2 mm on the contrast-enhanced sequence.
It is recommended to perform salivary gland ultrasound and soft tissue ultrasound (one anatomical zone) of the neck in all patients with clinical manifestations of glossopharyngeal neuralgia to clarify the etiology of the disease [147].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform videolaryngoscopy in all patients with clinical manifestations of glossopharyngeal neuralgia to clarify the etiology of the disease [79].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform brain computed tomography (craniovertebral junction) in patients with clinical presentation of glossopharyngeal neuralgia when causative pathology is absent on brain MRI, to rule out an elongated styloid process and/or elongated or calcified stylohyoid ligament [79,80].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced soft tissue magnetic resonance imaging (neck, including fat-suppression sequences) in patients with suspected secondary glossopharyngeal neuralgia or glossopharyngeal neuropathic pain after ruling out causative pathology on brain MRI including the craniovertebral junction [79,80].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform FIESTA and 3D TOF brain magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected classical glossopharyngeal neuralgia after ruling out causes of secondary glossopharyngeal neuralgia to clarify the disease etiology [79,80].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment:
According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, neurovascular conflict is diagnosed when structural changes in the nerve root (dystopia, atrophy) are present;
The names of the recommended sequences may vary depending on the manufacturer of the magnetic resonance scanner;
The preferred slice thickness for the FIESTA (CISS, DRIVE) sequence is 0.4–0.6 mm;
For diagnosing structural changes in the trigeminal nerve root, scanners with a magnetic field strength of 3 T are preferred, but not less than 1.5 T.
2.5 Other Procedures
2.5.1. Trigeminal nerve disorders
2.5.1.1. Trigeminal neuralgia
It is recommended to conduct an initial dental examination (consultation) in patients with a questionable trigeminal neuralgia diagnosis to rule out odontogenic pain [191,192].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to conduct an initial otorhinolaryngologist examination (consultation) in patients with suspected facial pain caused by paranasal sinus disease to clarify the cause of pain [192].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to conduct an initial maxillofacial surgeon examination (consultation) in patients with suspected facial pain caused by trauma and other maxillofacial conditions to clarify the cause of pain [191,192].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to conduct an initial psychiatric examination (consultation) when anxiety or depression symptoms are detected and in all cases of questionable trigeminal neuralgia once orofacial pain is excluded [193].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to perform an initial neurosurgeon consultation for all patients with pharmacoresistance, intolerance to conservative treatment, or poor adherence to conservative treatment for trigeminal neuralgia to determine the feasibility of surgical treatment [194][195].
Level of Recommendations CLevel of Evidence 3Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to consult a neurologist at a specialized center (Interdistrict Multiple Sclerosis Center / Multiple Sclerosis Office or similar structures) for patients presenting with clinical features of trigeminal neuralgia and suspected demyelinating disease based on brain MRI, in order to confirm or exclude a demyelinating disease [196,197].
Level of evidence BGrade of recommendation 3Level of recommendation confidence – B (level of evidence certainty – 3).
2.5.1.2. Atypical facial pain
Specialist consultations
Burning Mouth Syndrome
It is recommended that all patients with burning mouth syndrome undergo a dental consultation to rule out dental pathology and a potential symptomatic etiology of the condition [7][27][198].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: To meet the diagnostic criteria for burning mouth syndrome, clinical evaluation of the oral mucosa must reveal a complete absence of lesions or other abnormalities. Examination of the oral mucosa plays a key role; the absence of mucosal lesions points toward a diagnosis of burning mouth syndrome, whereas mucosal changes suggest an alternative condition. Microbiological analysis of mucosal sites where pain is localized may be effective in ruling out potential bacterial or fungal infections. Patients with painful erythematous lesions may require allergy skin testing to rule out allergic reactions. A dental examination is performed to exclude acute gingivitis, periodontitis, and/or other painful oral conditions. Erosive and ulcerative lesions that do not resolve within 2 weeks should be considered an indication for perilesional biopsy [7][27][198].
It is recommended to consult a psychiatrist if symptoms of anxiety or depression are detected, or in cases of chronic pain lasting longer than 3 months, to rule out somatoform disorder and anxiety-depressive disorder [7,154].
GIB CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Many patients with burning mouth syndrome exhibit high levels of anxiety and depression, as well as pain relief following appropriate administration of psychotropic medications such as antidepressants or benzodiazepines. Notably, high levels of anxiety and depression are widespread among patients with various types of chronic pain syndromes [7,154].
Persistent idiopathic facial pain
It is recommended that all patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain undergo a dental consultation to rule out dental pathology and a potential symptomatic etiology of the condition [108]. Level of recommendation – C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to consult a psychiatrist if symptoms of anxiety or depression are detected, or in cases of chronic pain lasting longer than 3 months, to rule out somatoform disorder and anxiety-depressive disorder [20,26,63,104,108].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain may present with chronic pain syndromes in other locations, such as chronic back pain, neck pain, myofascial pain, migraine, irritable bowel syndrome, or dysmenorrhea. 50% of patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain report chronic fatigue [63] The prevalence of emotional-affective and other psychiatric disorders is higher among patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain than in the general population [103].
Myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm
It is recommended to consult a psychiatrist if symptoms of anxiety or depression are detected, or in cases of chronic pain lasting longer than 3 months, to rule out somatoform disorder and anxiety-depressive disorder [199–201].
GOR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comments: Patients with myofascial orofacial pain exhibit high levels of anxiety and depression. Patients with myofascial orofacial pain may present with comorbid conditions such as migraine, irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue, or restless legs syndrome [199–201].
2.5.1.3. Other disorders of the trigeminal nerve, trigeminal nerve disorder unspecified
It is recommended to perform an initial psychological testing and consultation by a medical psychologist for all patients with chronic trigeminal neuropathic pain in order to identify factors contributing to the chronification of the pain syndrome [202].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial psychiatrist consultation for patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain when symptoms of anxiety and depression are detected [193].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to perform an initial dermatovenereologist consultation and/or initial infectious disease specialist consultation for all patients suspected of having trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with Herpes zoster, in order to clarify the diagnosis and treat the underlying condition [203,204].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial ophthalmologist consultation for all patients suspected of having trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with Herpes zoster, for the prevention and treatment of ocular involvement in ophthalmic branch localization of the disease [203,204].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial dentist consultation for all patients suspected of an odontogenic cause of trigeminal neuropathic pain in order to identify and treat the underlying condition [205,206].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial rheumatologist consultation for all patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain in the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve, first appearing after the age of 50 and accompanied by episodes of pain-related amaurosis fugax, to rule out giant cell arteritis as the primary cause of pain [109].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial neurosurgeon consultation for all patients with pharmacoresistance or intolerance to conservative treatment of trigeminal neuropathic pain to determine the feasibility of minimally invasive percutaneous intervention and surgical treatment [194,195].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
2.5.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Not required for typical clinical presentations.
2.5.2. Facial nerve disorders
2.5.2.1. Facial nerve neuropathy
Specialist consultations
It is recommended to perform an initial otolaryngologist consultation including examination of the auditory organ (otoscopy) for all patients with facial nerve neuropathy to rule out an otogenic cause, and, as indicated, objective audiometry and tympanometry [37,95,96,110,111].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: audiometry makes it possible to detect conductive hearing loss and suspect a facial nerve tumor within the petrous part of the temporal bone, or sensorineural hearing loss and suspect facial nerve compression by a space-occupying lesion located in the cerebellopontine angle. Tympanometry evaluates the acoustic reflex of the stapedius muscle [95,96].
It is recommended to perform a scheduled initial ophthalmologist consultation for patients with uncomplicated lagophthalmos due to facial nerve neuropathy, for the adjustment of early preventive therapy prescribed by a neurologist [119].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an emergency initial ophthalmologist consultation, including assessment of corneal surface defects, for patients with complicated lagophthalmos due to facial nerve neuropathy in order to preserve vision [119].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: complicated lagophthalmos is characterized by the onset of inflammatory processes (ocular redness, discomfort, burning, pain, photophobia), and in the absence of treatment, corneal erosions and ulcers develop. Severe complications include corneal perforation and inflammation of the eyeball, which can lead to loss of the eye [102,119].
It is recommended to perform an initial infectious disease specialist consultation for patients with suspected symptomatic facial nerve neuropathy of infectious etiology for further evaluation and treatment adjustment [34,48,140–143].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform a clinical and psychological psychodiagnostic assessment (psychologist consultation) and, in the presence of suicidal ideation, an initial psychiatrist consultation for patients with facial nerve neuropathy in order to assess their psychoemotional state and provide psychological rehabilitation [207].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: referral for a psychological consultation is of a recommendatory nature when the patient expresses complaints of: 1) social maladjustment associated with the disease (deteriorated quality of life, restricted social contacts, dismissal from work, or rejection by a partner); 2) non-acceptance of own appearance, preoccupation with one's attractiveness; 3) uncontrolled anxiety, depressed mood, apathy, obsessive thoughts about what happened; 4) sleep and appetite disturbances; 5) difficulties in expressing and recognizing emotions; 6) tension due to physical discomfort, inability to cope with pain [208].
Consultations with surgical specialists to address the issue of surgical treatment
Surgical treatment is performed in the acute and chronic periods of the disease in patients with unfavorable clinical and myographic predictors. If the disease duration is less than 3 months in patients with idiopathic facial neuropathy (IFN), pathogenetic surgical treatment is considered – decompression of the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve in the temporal bone pyramidal canal. Further, regardless of the form of the disease (idiopathic, symptomatic), re-innervating surgery is performed for a disease duration of up to 18 months, and reconstructive-plastic surgery for a duration of more than 18 months [177]. In cases of surgical treatment, patient management and rehabilitation follow the same algorithm [82].
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a neurosurgeon as early as possible (but after obtaining ENMG and EMG reports, i.e., no earlier than 8 days from symptom onset) in patients with idiopathic IFN and a severe degree of impairment, in order to determine indications for surgical treatment – facial nerve decompression to improve the outcome of the disease [92,209].
Leveled of Evidence CLevel of Data Reliability 2Level of evidence C (level of data reliability – 2)
Comments: Careful patient selection is recommended for referral to a neurosurgeon. The diagnosis of idiopathic IFN (Bell's palsy) must be reliably established based on a comprehensive clinical and instrumental evaluation, specifically: the severity of damage according to the HB scale must correspond to grades V–VI; according to stimulation ENMG, the difference in M-wave amplitudes between the affected and healthy sides must exceed 90%; recurrent IFN and other causes of facial nerve damage must be excluded [92] (LeveL of Evidence – 1). Surgical decompression of the facial nerve is recommended to be performed within 14 days, preferably via the middle cranial fossa approach compared to the transmastoid approach [209] (Level of Evidence – 1). However, the surgery requires careful patient selection and preoperative preparation, which takes time. Surgical decompression can be performed up to 3 months from symptom onset [210–212]. In case of positive dynamics during this period (clinical or myographic), surgical treatment is not performed.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a maxillofacial surgeon after 3 months from symptom onset in patients with idiopathic or symptomatic IFN and a severe degree of impairment, in order to determine indications for surgical treatment – re-innervating or reconstructive-plastic surgery to improve the outcome of the disease [213–227].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: The degree of facial nerve impairment is established based on a comprehensive clinical and instrumental evaluation, specifically: the severity of damage according to the HB scale must correspond to grades V–VI; according to stimulation ENMG, the difference in M-wave amplitudes between the affected and healthy sides must exceed 90%. The presence or absence of muscle atrophy according to ultrasound or MRI is taken into account. Re-innervating surgeries are performed within a period of up to 18 months, after which reconstructive-plastic surgeries are performed.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a maxillofacial surgeon in patients with the consequences of IFN – post-paralytic hemifacial spasm (pronounced multiple synkinesias), in order to determine indications for selective neurectomy (neurolysis) for the elimination of involuntary movements [228–230].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: patients with mild to moderate post-paralytic hemifacial spasm undergo conservative treatment – administration of botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system and physical rehabilitation.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a physical therapy physician in patients with IFN and a severe degree of impairment or in the presence of factors worsening the outcome of the disease, in order to improve the outcome of the disease [115].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Consultation with a physical therapy physician is mandatory for patients with a severe degree of IFN (grades V–VI on the HB scale), as well as upon the development of complications – muscle hypertonus, synkinesias, which limit recovery. In other cases, patients undergo home self-rehabilitation in accordance with a standard set of exercises.
2.5.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
Specialist consultations
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a neurosurgeon in patients with primary hemifacial spasm upon confirmation of neurovascular conflict according to MRI data, in order to determine indications for vascular decompression – separation of the vessel and nerve [231,232].
Strength of Recommendation Grade BLevel of Evidence 2Strength of recommendation grade B (level of evidence – 2).
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a neurosurgeon in patients with secondary (symptomatic) hemifacial spasm upon detection of a space-occupying lesion according to MRI data, in order to determine indications for surgical treatment [122,123].
Level of Recommendations CLevel of Evidence 5Level of recommendations C (level of evidence – 5).
2.5.2.3. Facial myokymia
Not required in the typical course of the disease.
2.5.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by anotorinolaryngologist in patients with suspected facial pain caused by paranasal sinus disease, in order to clarify the cause of the pain [80].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a dentist in patients with a doubtful diagnosis of atypical facial pain to exclude odontogenic pain [79].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a psychiatrist upon detection of symptoms of anxiety, depression, and in all cases of doubtful trigeminal neuralgia when excluding orofacial pain [233].
GPP CLEL 4Level of Evidence Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a neurosurgeon in all patients with pharmacoresistance or intolerance to conservative treatment, or decreased adherence to conservative treatment for trigeminal neuralgia, in order to clarify the possibilities of surgical treatment of the disease [79][234]
Strength of Recommendation Grade CStrength of recommendation grade C (level of evid
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
3.1. Trigeminal nerve disorders
3.1.1. Trigeminal neuralgia
It is recommended to use three approaches to the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: conservative therapy, minimally invasive interventions, and surgical procedures [235]. Conservative treatment includes preventative therapy and management of acute pain attacks [236].
LoE CGoR 5Level of evidence – C (grade of recommendation – 5)
Conservative therapy
Preventative drug treatment
It is recommended preventative therapy for all patients with an established diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia in order to reduce the frequency of facial pain paroxysms [236].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Antiepileptic drugs and centrally acting muscle relaxants are used for the preventative therapy of trigeminal neuralgia (Table 13).
Table 13. Drugs used for the preventative therapy of trigeminal neuralgia [236,237].
Drug | Dosing regimen | Therapeutic daily dose | Common side effects |
|---|---|---|---|
Carbamazepine** (ATX code - N03AF01) [236,237] | 100 mg 2 times a day; increase the dose of the drug by 100-200 mg every 3 days up to 200 mg 4 times a day | 800-1200 mg | Sedation, dizziness, blurred vision, nausea, instability, lethargy, diplopia, headache. May cause hyponatremia, skin rash, pancytopenia. Risk of osteoporosis with prolonged use. May reduce the effectiveness of oral contraception. |
#Oxcarbazepine** (ATX code - N03AF02) [236,237] | 150 mg 2 times a day; increase the dose of the drug by 150-300 mg every 3 days up to 300 mg 4 times a day | 1200-1800 mg | Drowsiness, dizziness, diplopia, confusion, nausea, abdominal pain, headache, depression, diarrhea. High risk of hyponatremia. Regular use increases the risks of osteoporosis. May reduce the effectiveness of oral contraceptives. |
#Lamotrigine (ATX code - N03AX09) [236,237] | 25 mg once a day; dose increase by 25 mg every 2 weeks; after 100 mg per day, dose increase by 25 mg every week. Frequency of administration up to 100 mg per day – possibly once a day, over 100 mg per day – 2 times a day. | 200 mg | Blurred vision, agitation, aggression, instability, dizziness, nausea, dry mouth, insomnia, joint pain. Risk of skin rash and Stevens-Johnson syndrome with rapid dose escalation. The drug can be discontinued without dose titration. |
#Baclofen** (ATX code - M03BX01) [236,237] | 5 mg 3 times a day; increase by 5 mg every 3 days. | 40-80 mg | Anxiety, depression, agitation, instability, headache, sedative effect, tremor, skin rash, blurred vision, dry mouth, abdominal pain, withdrawal symptoms upon too rapid discontinuation. |
#Gabapentin (ATC code - N02BF01, N03AX12) [236,237] | 300 mg once daily; increase the dose by 300 mg daily up to 900 mg per day, then by 300 mg every 3–5 days. | 900–3600 mg | Amnesia, confusion, dizziness, somnolence, depression, nausea, blurred vision, peripheral edema, facial edema, constipation, abdominal bloating, weight gain. |
#Pregabalin** (ATC code - N02BF02) [236,237] | 75 mg twice daily | 600 mg | Confusion, somnolence, constipation, blurred vision, dizziness, nausea, peripheral edema, facial edema, increased appetite, weight gain. |
General management recommendations for patients with TN include:
When choosing a drug, contraindications to use and individual tolerability should be considered. To improve treatment tolerability, it is possible to switch to a generic drug with the same active substance and dose;
To assess tolerability, treatment should be initiated with monotherapy. If combination therapy is necessary, drugs should be prescribed sequentially to assess the tolerability of each.
Carbamazepine** (ATC code - N03AF01) and #Oxcarbazepine** (ATC code - N03AF02) are classified as first-line drugs, while the rest are second-line therapy. Second-line drugs can be used as monotherapy or in combination with first-line drugs [235];
Switching from one antiepileptic drug to another should be done gradually, according to the drug prescribing information;
In case of intolerance to #Baclofen** (ATC code - M03BX01), prescribing #Clonazepam** may be considered;
Once remission is achieved, i.e., absence of pain for at least 4 weeks, the dose of ongoing medications should be slowly tapered according to their instructions, and conservative treatment may be discontinued completely [238];
In case of pain recurrence, medical treatment should be gradually resumed up to the minimum effective dose [235];
During regular intake of antiepileptic drugs, blood parameters should be monitored every 3–6 months: complete blood count (platelets, leukocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils), general clinical blood biochemistry (glucose, ALP, ALT, AST, total bilirubin), serum electrolytes (sodium, potassium). If necessary, perform an ECG and assess serum anticonvulsant concentrations (therapeutic drug monitoring).
If there is no analgesic effect from any drug treatment despite good tolerability, a psychiatric consultation should be recommended to clarify the genesis of the pain syndrome;
It is not necessary to prescribe every listed drug before referring a patient for neurosurgical treatment. It is important to inform the patient about surgical treatment options in a timely manner [235].
It is recommended to prescribe Carbamazepine** (ATC code - N03AF01) to patients with TN for prophylactic treatment [236].
LoE CGoR 5Level of evidence – C (grade of recommendation – 5)
It is recommended to prescribe #Oxcarbazepine** (ATC code - N03AF02) to patients with TN for prophylactic treatment [238].
LoE CGoR 5Level of evidence – C (grade of recommendation – 5)
It is recommended to prescribe #Lamotrigine (ATC code - N03AX09) to patients with TN for prophylactic treatment [238].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to prescribe #Baclofen** (ATC code - M03BX01) to patients with TN for prophylactic treatment [238].
LoE CGoR 5Level of evidence – C (grade of recommendation – 5)
It is recommended to prescribe #Gabapentin (ATC code - N02BF01, N03AX12) to patients with TN for prophylactic treatment [238].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to prescribe #Pregabalin** (ATC code - N02BF02) to patients with TN for prophylactic treatment [238].
LoE CGoR 5Level of evidence – C (grade of recommendation – 5)
It is not recommended to use prophylactic therapy with opioids / opioid drugs (ATC code - N02) in patients with TN to reduce the frequency of facial pain paroxysms [235].
Other prophylactic treatment.
Botulinum therapy and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are acceptable in the treatment of TN in adults.
It is recommended to prescribe botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system to patients with TN as additional prophylactic treatment [235,239–241].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comment: botulinum toxin (ATC code – M03AX01) is used – #botulinum toxin type A** and #botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** preparations at a dose of 1.25–5 IU intradermally, 15–20 mm apart at trigger points, up to 25–100 IU in total.
It is recommended to use high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with TN as additional prophylactic treatment [242,243].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Relief of acute pain episodes in trigeminal neuralgia
It is recommended to use local anesthetics for acute pain relief in patients with TN [236,244,245].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comments: The list of drugs is presented in Table 14. Frequent use of #Lidocaine** spray (ATC code - D04AB01, N01BB02) is associated with the risk of mucosal damage due to the ethanol content in the solution. Before performing a trigeminal nerve branch block, a skin test must be performed in accordance with the drug's instructions.
Table 14. Drugs for the treatment of acute pain episodes in adults with TN.
#Lidocaine** (ATC code - D04AB01, N01BB02) [236,244,245] | - 10% spray for external and local use, 2 sprays into the nasal cavity on the painful side; - 5% gel applied topically to the trigger zone; - 2% #Lidocaine** solution (ATC code - N01BB02) 1:80,000 #epinephrine** (ATC code - C01CA24) – local infiltration for blockade of the symptomatic trigeminal nerve branch; - intravenously 1.5–5 mg/kg over more than 1 hour. |
|---|---|
#botulinum toxin type A** and #botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** (ATC code - M03AX01) [236,239,240] | 50 IU + 1.0 ml of 0.9% normal saline, subcutaneously into trigger points. |
It is not recommended to use NSAIDs in patients with TN for acute pain relief [237].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: The mechanism of action of NSAIDs is related to the relief of pain and inflammation by blocking the COX system, which is effective in nociceptive pain. Given the pathogenesis of pain in TN, the use of NSAIDs is ineffective. In cases where pain is relieved by NSAIDs, local inflammatory processes should be ruled out as the cause of the pain syndrome.
Specifics of treating chronic pain caused by trigeminal neuralgia in adults
It is recommended to prescribe #Amitriptyline** (ATC code - N06AA09) to patients with chronic TN for prophylactic treatment of pain – Table 15 [246–248]. Recommendation Grade B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to prescribe #Duloxetine (ATC code - N06AX21) to patients with chronic TN for prophylactic treatment of pain – Table 15 [249–251].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
It is recommended to prescribe #Venlafaxine (ATC code - N06AX16) to patients with chronic TN for prophylactic treatment of pain – Table 15 [248].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Table 15. Drugs used for the treatment of chronic pain caused by TN in adults
Drug | Dosing regimen | Therapeutic daily dose | Common side effects |
|---|---|---|---|
#Amitriptyline** (ATC code - N06AA09) [252] | start with 5–6.25 mg in the evening an hour and a half before bedtime, then increase the dose by 5–6.25 mg every 3–5 days | 12.5–75 mg | Sedation, dry mouth, urinary hesitancy, constipation, blurred vision, diplopia, elevated intraocular pressure, memory impairment, tremor, arrhythmia. |
#Duloxetine (ATC code - N06AX21) [252] | start with 30 mg once daily in the first half of the day for 1–2 weeks, then 60 mg once daily in the first half of the day. | 60 mg | Dizziness, sleep disturbance (somnolence or insomnia), dry mouth, nausea, constipation, hyperhidrosis, weight loss. |
#Venlafaxine (ATC code - N06AX16) [252] | start with 18.75 mg twice daily during meals, increasing by 18.75 mg every few days. Once the dosage of 75 mg per day is reached, the dose can be increased by 37.5 mg per day | 75–225 mg | Nausea, decreased appetite, constipation, weight loss, arterial hypertension, dizziness, insomnia, paresthesia, tremor, blurred vision, sexual dysfunction, sweating, high probability of withdrawal syndrome. |
Comments: special considerations for antidepressant use:
Before initiating antidepressant therapy, it is important to explain the treatment goals, expected effects, and timeline to the patient;
Patients should be warned about temporary adverse effects during the first weeks of administration. Informing the patient about their transient nature will increase treatment adherence;
It is also worthwhile to dispel the patient's main fears associated with antidepressant use, address all counterarguments, and provide a reasoned response.
It is recommended to provide psychotherapy to patients with chronic TN to reduce anxiety, depression, pain catastrophizing, and to improve quality of life and functional activity [253,254].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: psychotherapeutic methods include the following: cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) [255], biofeedback [253,254], relaxation techniques [255][256], mindfulness [257] and others.
Minimally invasive puncture procedures in patients with trigeminal neuralgia
Minimally invasive puncture procedures in patients with classical TN
It is recommended to perform radiofrequency ablation of peripheral nerves, plexuses, and autonomic ganglia in the form of standard (thermal) radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) of the supraorbital nerve in the region of the supraorbital notch under CT or ultrasound guidance in patients with trigeminal neuralgia in the supraorbital nerve innervation zone when conservative therapy is insufficiently effective [258,259].
Grade BLevel 3Recommendation Grade B (Level of Evidence - 3).
Comments: This recommendation is supported by two retrospective studies (Ren H, Xie K). The studies demonstrate a high level of safety and efficacy of supraorbital SRFA over a follow-up range of 24 to 36 months. Given that SRFA is a destructive procedure, it is advisable to perform a preliminary diagnostic block of the supraorbital nerve with a local anesthetic and glucocorticosteroid to confirm the diagnosis.
It is recommended to perform radiofrequency ablation of peripheral nerves, plexuses, and autonomic ganglia in the form of high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) and/or standard (thermal) radiofrequency ablation of the infraorbital nerve in the region of the infraorbital foramen under CT guidance in patients with trigeminal neuralgia within the innervation projection of the infraorbital nerve when conservative therapy is insufficiently effective, following a prior diagnostic block of the infraorbital nerve [260–262].
LoR BLoE 2Level of Evidence B (Level of Certainty of Evidence - 2).
Comments: To support this recommendation, 1 double-blind RCT (Luo F), 1 observational study (Jia Y), and 1 retrospective study (Sun Z) are cited. Patient selection for PRFA and/or TRFA was based, among other things, on the positive effect of a therapeutic and diagnostic block. Studies demonstrate a high level of safety and efficacy of PRFA and/or TRFA of the infraorbital nerve with a follow-up period of up to 2 years. A higher efficacy of high-voltage (96V) PRFA of the infraorbital nerve compared to the 50V PRFA mode has been demonstrated. The high efficacy of combined prolonged (10 minutes) PRFA followed by TRFA of the infraorbital nerve has also been demonstrated.
Minimally invasive puncture interventions in patients with idiopathic and symptomatic TN
It is recommended to perform percutaneous balloon compression of the trigeminal ganglion in idiopathic or symptomatic TN to reduce pain intensity in the absence of pain relief after treatment of the underlying condition or when such treatment is not feasible [263].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is recommended to perform radiofrequency ablation of peripheral nerves, plexuses, and autonomic ganglia in the form of standard (thermal) radiofrequency ablation of the trigeminal nerve in idiopathic or symptomatic TN to reduce pain intensity in the absence of pain relief after treatment of the underlying condition or when such treatment is not feasible [264–266].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is recommended to perform glycerol rhizotomy of the trigeminal nerve in idiopathic or symptomatic TN to reduce pain intensity in the absence of pain relief after treatment of the underlying condition or when such treatment is not feasible [267,268].
GCR CLEL 3Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 3)
Surgical treatment
Surgical intervention is considered in pharmacoresistant pain courses and impaired patient quality of life. It is necessary to timely inform the patient about the possibilities of surgical treatment and refer the patient to a neurosurgical center. Surgical treatment should be performed in specialized neurosurgical departments with experience in brain surgery and surgical management of TN.
It is recommended to provide neurosurgical treatment to patients with pharmacoresistant trigeminal neuralgia or drug intolerance to therapy [269].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comment:
Pharmacoresistance is defined in patients in whom conservative treatment fails to achieve adequate pain control or causes pronounced side effects [235].
There is no conclusive data on the criteria for pharmacoresistance and the necessary observation period for patients [194].
From 25 to 40% of patients choose surgical treatment within 2 years of symptom onset [236].
The success of surgical treatment largely depends on the diagnostic accuracy and the proper technical execution of the surgery.
Surgical treatment of patients with classical TN
It is recommended to perform cranial nerve (trigeminal) root decompression in patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia to eliminate neurovascular conflict when conservative treatment is ineffective/poorly tolerated or due to low adherence to drug therapy [270,271].
GCP CLEL 3Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comment: the prerequisite for choosing microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve root is the visualization of a neurovascular conflict with structural changes of the trigeminal root (dystopia, atrophy) on brain MRI [1]. Despite publications showing successful outcomes, in patients over 75 years of age, microvascular decompression must be considered on an individual basis, taking into account the patient's somatic status and surgical risks. The retrosigmoid suboccipital approach is the primary surgical access. Interposition is a widespread decompression technique, and vessel transposition is performed whenever possible. According to the literature, there are no advantages of transposition [272]. If the patient refuses microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve root, other neurosurgical procedures may be performed [273].
It is recommended to perform stereotactic brain surgery (stereotactic radiosurgery of the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve root with a maximum dose of up to 90 Gy) in patients with classical TN when conservative treatment is ineffective/poorly tolerated or due to low adherence to drug therapy, and when trigeminal nerve root decompression is not feasible, including patient refusal of surgery [274].
GRL ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comment: irradiation using a Gamma Knife device is preferred; treatment on linear accelerators capable of stereotactic radiosurgery with a maximum dose of 70–90 Gy to the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve root is also acceptable. Repeat stereotactic radiosurgery can be performed no earlier than 1 year after the previous one.
It is recommended to use an implantable neurostimulator in patients with classical trigeminal neuralgia to reduce pain intensity if pain does not regress after conservative and/or surgical treatment of the underlying condition, or if such treatment is not feasible [275].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
Comment: a mandatory prerequisite prior to implanting a neurostimulator for trigeminal nerve branch stimulation is performing test invasive stimulation to determine the efficacy of the method. If adequate pain control is achieved with test peripheral stimulation, the patient is offered implantation of a chronic stimulation system.
Surgical treatment of patients with idiopathic TN
It is recommended to perform stereotactic brain surgery (stereotactic radiosurgery of the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve root with a maximum dose of up to 90 Gy) in patients with idiopathic TN to reduce pain intensity when conservative treatment is ineffective/poorly tolerated or due to low adherence to drug therapy [274].
GRL ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is recommended to perform rhizotomy (microsurgical partial (sensory) rhizotomy) of the trigeminal nerve root in idiopathic TN to reduce pain intensity when other treatment methods (conservative, minimally invasive, and surgical) are ineffective [264–266].
GCP CLEL 3Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 3).
It is recommended to implant a neurostimulator in patients with idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia to reduce pain intensity when other treatment methods (conservative, minimally invasive, and surgical) are ineffective [275].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
Comment: a mandatory prerequisite prior to implanting a neurostimulator for trigeminal nerve branch stimulation is performing test invasive stimulation to determine the efficacy of the method. If adequate pain control is achieved with test peripheral stimulation, the patient is offered implantation of a chronic stimulation system.
Surgical treatment of patients with TN associated with multiple sclerosis
It is recommended to perform stereotactic brain surgery (stereotactic radiosurgery) in patients with multiple sclerosis-associated TN to reduce pain intensity when conservative treatment is ineffective/poorly tolerated or due to low adherence to drug therapy [276,277].
GCP CLEL 3Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comment:
The safest target for intervention is the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve root with a maximum dose of up to 90 Gy;
Medial thalamotomy using stereotactic radiosurgery or focused ultrasound may be performed in patients with TN associated with multiple sclerosis when stereotactic radiosurgery of the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve root is ineffective.
It is recommended to perform rhizotomy (microsurgical partial (sensory) rhizotomy) of the trigeminal nerve root in patients with TN associated with multiple sclerosis to reduce pain intensity when other treatment methods (conservative, minimally invasive, and surgical) are ineffective [278].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is recommended to perform microvascular decompression of the cranial nerve (trigeminal) root in patients with TN associated with multiple sclerosis in the presence of a neurovascular conflict with signs of structural root alterations (dystopia, atrophy) on brain MRI to reduce pain intensity in case of ineffectiveness/intolerance of conservative treatment or low adherence to pharmacotherapy [278].
GRL ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comment: there are no compelling comparative data on the superiority of any particular surgical treatment method. Patients should be informed about all possible surgical treatment methods and their specific features. Given the equivalent efficacy of all surgical treatment methods and the recurrence rate, it is safer to perform stereotactic radiosurgery or minimally invasive percutaneous interventions [278].
It is recommended to perform neurostimulator implantation in patients with trigeminal neuralgia associated with MS to reduce pain intensity when other treatment methods (conservative, minimally invasive, and surgical) are ineffective [275].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
Comment: a mandatory prerequisite prior to implanting a neurostimulator for trigeminal nerve branch stimulation is performing test invasive stimulation to determine the efficacy of the method. If adequate pain control is achieved with test peripheral stimulation, the patient is offered implantation of a chronic stimulation system.
Surgical treatment of patients with symptomatic TN
It is recommended to perform neurosurgical treatment for secondary trigeminal neuralgia to eliminate the direct cause of the disease [279,280].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
Comment: it is advisable to perform surgical treatment aimed at treating the underlying condition (e.g., tumor removal) along with decompression of the trigeminal nerve root from compressing factors.
It is recommended to perform a stereotactic brain surgery (stereotactic radiosurgery of the cisternal portion of the trigeminal nerve root delivering a maximum dose of up to 90 Gy) in patients with symptomatic TN if pain does not regress after treatment of the underlying condition or if such treatment is impossible [281].
GRL ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is recommended to perform rhizotomy (microsurgical partial (sensory) rhizotomy) of the trigeminal nerve root in patients with symptomatic TN if pain does not regress after treatment of the underlying condition, or if such treatment is impossible, as well as when other pain management methods (conservative, minimally invasive, and surgical) are ineffective [235].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: there are no compelling comparative data demonstrating the superiority of any single destruction method [235].
It is recommended to perform neurostimulator implantation in patients with symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia to reduce pain intensity when other treatment methods (conservative, minimally invasive, and surgical) are ineffective [275].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
Comment: a mandatory prerequisite prior to implanting a neurostimulator for trigeminal nerve branch stimulation is performing test invasive stimulation to determine the efficacy of the method. If adequate pain control is achieved with test peripheral stimulation, the patient is offered implantation of a chronic stimulation system.
3.1.2. Atypical facial pain
Conservative treatment
Persistent idiopathic facial pain
It is recommended for patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) to prescribe tricyclic antidepressants (#amitriptyline**, ATC code: N06AA09) to reduce pain intensity and anxiety levels — Table 16 [282].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Therapy is started with a minimum dose taken at bedtime, as even a minimum dose of tricyclic antidepressants proves effective, and is increased by gradual titration to the average therapeutic dose in accordance with the drug's instructions for use [282].
It is recommended for patients with PIFP to prescribe #venlafaxine (ATC code: N06AX16) in case of contraindications, poor tolerability, or insufficient efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants — Table 16 [283].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended for patients with PIFP to prescribe #fluoxetine** (ATC code: N06AB03) in case of contraindications, poor tolerability, or insufficient efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants and #venlafaxine (ATC code: N06AX16) — Table 16 [20,26,108].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Table 16. Medications for the treatment of PIFP
Drug | Dosing regimen | Therapeutic daily dose | Common side effects |
|---|---|---|---|
#Amitriptyline** ATC code: N06AA09 [282] | 6.25–12.5 mg in the evening once daily; increase the dose by 6.25–12.5 mg every 3–14 days. | 10–75 mg | Sedation, dry mouth, urinary hesitancy, constipation, blurred vision, diplopia, elevated intraocular pressure, memory impairment, tremor, arrhythmia. |
#Fluoxetine** ATC code: N06AB03 [20] | 20 mg once daily | 20 mg | Dizziness, sleep disorders (somnolence or insomnia), dry mouth, nausea, constipation, hyperhidrosis, weight loss, decreased libido |
#Venlafaxine ATC code: N06AX16 [20] | in neurology and general practice, slow titration of the drug is acceptable: 18.75 mg twice a day with meals, increasing by 18.75 mg every few days [252] | 75 mg | Nausea, decreased appetite, constipation, weight loss, arterial hypertension, dizziness, insomnia, paresthesia, tremor, blurred vision, sexual dysfunction, sweating, high probability of withdrawal syndrome. |
Comments: special considerations for antidepressant use:
Before initiating antidepressant therapy, it is important to explain the treatment goals, expected effects, and timeline to the patient;
Patients should be warned about temporary adverse effects during the first weeks of administration. Informing the patient about their transient nature will increase treatment adherence;
It is also worthwhile to dispel the patient's main fears associated with antidepressant use, address all counterarguments, and provide a reasoned response.
It is recommended to prescribe gabapentin (ATC code: N02BF01) or pregabalin** (ATC code: N02BF02) to patients with neuropathic pain due to lumbar radiculopathy in case of ineffectiveness or intolerance of antidepressants – Table 17 [20, 26, 108].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Table 17. Drugs for the treatment of neuropathic pain due to lumbar radiculopathy
Gabapentin ATC code: N02BF01 | 300 mg once daily; increase the dose by 300 mg daily up to 900 mg per day, then by 300 mg every 3–5 days. | 900–3600 mg | Amnesia, confusion, dizziness, somnolence, depression, nausea, blurred vision, peripheral edema, facial edema, constipation, abdominal bloating, weight gain. |
|---|---|---|---|
Pregabalin** ATC code: N02BF02 | 75 mg twice daily | 600 mg | Confusion, somnolence, constipation, blurred vision, dizziness, nausea, peripheral edema, facial edema, increased appetite, weight gain. |
It is recommended to prescribe botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system in patients with neuropathic pain due to lumbar radiculopathy when pharmacotherapy is insufficiently effective [284].
GIB CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: botulinum toxin (ATC code – M03AX01) – #botulinum toxin type A** and #botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** preparations are administered into the pain area and surrounding tissues.
Burning Mouth Syndrome
It is recommended to prescribe tricyclic antidepressants (#amitriptyline** (ATC code: N06AA09)) to patients with painful radiculopathy to reduce pain intensity and anxiety levels [282].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Therapy is started with a minimum dose taken at night, since even a minimal dose of tricyclic antidepressants proves effective, and is increased with gradual titration up to the average therapeutic dose according to the drug's instructions for use (average daily dose of 10–50 mg).[282].
It is recommended to prescribe gabapentin (ATC code: N02BF01) to patients with painful radiculopathy to reduce pain intensity [285, 286].
GCR BLEL 1Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 1)
It is recommended to prescribe #alpha-lipoic acid (thioctic acid) to patients with painful radiculopathy to reduce pain intensity [285, 286].
GCR BLEL 1Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: the recommended daily dose of the drug is 600 mg. One study demonstrated higher efficacy with the combined use of #alpha-lipoic acid and gabapentin (ATC code: N02BF01) [285–287].
Myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm
It is recommended to prescribe non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (NSAIDs) to patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the back and neck muscles to reduce the intensity of acute pain [288, 289]. Oral forms of NSAIDs are preferred, as parenteral administration has no efficacy advantages but is significantly inferior in safety [290].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: When choosing an NSAID, it is necessary to take into account the presence and nature of risk factors for adverse events, concomitant diseases, and drug interactions. NSAIDs are not combined with each other and should not be used long-term (it is advisable to limit treatment to 10–14 days), which significantly reduces the risk of complications from the gastrointestinal tract, cardiovascular, and other systems. NSAIDs are contraindicated in erosive and ulcerative lesions of the gastrointestinal tract (especially in the acute stage), severe hepatic and renal impairment, individual intolerance, pregnancy, and severe heart failure. In patients at risk for gastrointestinal complications, it is recommended to use NSAIDs with the minimum risk of such complications, at low doses and for a short duration, and/or to consider gastroprotection for the prevention of such complications. When choosing a specific NSAID, it is necessary to check the instructions for medical use for the presence of the corresponding indication and the absence of contraindications [288–293].
It is recommended to prescribe tricyclic antidepressants (#amitriptyline**, ATC code: N06AA09) to patients with chronic myofascial pain syndrome of the back and neck muscles to reduce pain intensity and anxiety levels [282][289].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Therapy is started with a minimum dose taken at night (10 mg per day), since even a minimal dose of tricyclic antidepressants proves effective, and is increased with gradual titration up to the average therapeutic dose according to the drug's instructions for use (up to 150 mg per day) [282].
It is recommended to prescribe #gabapentin (ATC code: N02BF01) to patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the back and neck muscles in case of ineffectiveness or intolerance of antidepressants [294].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Therapy is started with a dose of 300 mg and increased by 300 mg every 3 days up to a maximum of 4200 mg.
It is recommended to prescribe botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system to patients with myofascial pain syndrome of the back and neck muscles into the affected muscles to relax them [295–297].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comment: botulinum toxin is used (ATC code – M03AX01) – botulinum toxin type A** and #botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** preparations intramuscularly into the target muscles.
Other treatment
Persistent idiopathic facial pain
It is recommended that patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP) receive cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to help them understand their condition, reduce pain catastrophizing, and develop positive strategies for coping with pain and emotional stress [298].
GIB CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Behavioral therapy is recommended for patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain as it helps reduce anxiety levels and fosters realistic self-assessment for better coping strategies in managing pain [20,298].
Burning Mouth Syndrome
It is recommended that patients with burning mouth syndrome (BMS) receive cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and psychotherapy to help them understand their condition, reduce pain catastrophizing, and develop positive strategies for coping with pain and emotional stress [299,300].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Myofascial orofacial pain associated with muscle spasm
It is recommended that patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorders undergo neuropsychological rehabilitation using biofeedback (BFB) to train psychological and muscular relaxation [301].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended that patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorders receive cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) to help them understand their condition, reduce pain catastrophizing, and develop positive strategies for coping with pain and emotional stress [302].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Interventional treatment
Persistent idiopathic facial pain
It is recommended that patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain (PIFP), when pharmacotherapy is insufficiently effective, undergo radiofrequency ablation of peripheral nerves, plexuses, and autonomic ganglia in the form of pulsed radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the pterygopalatine ganglion following a prior positive response to a pterygopalatine ganglion block [303].
GIB CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: a pterygopalatine ganglion block using the subzygomatic approach should be performed first. If adequate but temporary relief is achieved after the block, the option of performing pulsed RFA of the pterygopalatine ganglion should be considered [303].
3.1.3. Other trigeminal nerve disorders, unspecified trigeminal nerve disorder
Conservative treatment
It is recommended to prescribe antiepileptic drugs (gabapentin (ATC code - N02BF01, N03AX12), pregabalin** (ATC code - N02BF02)) to patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain as monotherapy or in combination with drugs from other groups to reduce the severity of pain syndrome – Table 18 [304–307].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Table 18. Drugs for the treatment of trigeminal neuropathic pain.
Drug | Dosing regimen | Therapeutic daily dose | Common side effects |
|---|---|---|---|
Gabapentin (ATC code - N02BF01, N03AX12) | 300 mg once daily; increase the dose by 300 mg daily up to 900 mg per day, then by 300 mg every 3–5 days. | 900–3600 mg | Amnesia, confusion, dizziness, somnolence, depression, nausea, blurred vision, peripheral edema, facial edema, constipation, abdominal bloating, weight gain. |
Pregabalin** (ATC code - N02BF02) | 75 mg twice daily | 600 mg | Confusion, somnolence, constipation, blurred vision, dizziness, nausea, peripheral edema, facial edema, increased appetite, weight gain. |
It is recommended to prescribe #oxcarbazepine** (ATC code - N03AF02) to patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain as monotherapy or in combination with drugs from other groups to reduce the intensity of pain syndrome [308].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: the starting dose of the drug is 300 mg per day with a gradual increase of 300 mg every 3 days up to 1800 mg per day in two divided doses.
It is recommended to prescribe antidepressants (#amitriptyline** (ATC code - N06AA09), #duloxetine (ATC code - N06AX21), #venlafaxine (ATC code - N06AX16)) to patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain as monotherapy or in combination with drugs from other groups to reduce the intensity of pain syndrome – Table 19 [248–250,309–312].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to prescribe #amitriptyline** (ATC code - N06AA09) to patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce the intensity of pain syndrome [309,310].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 1)
It is recommended to prescribe #duloxetine (ATC code - N06AX21) to patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce the intensity of pain syndrome [249,250].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
It is recommended to prescribe #venlafaxine (ATC code - N06AX16) to patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce the intensity of pain syndrome [248,311,312].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Table 19. Antidepressants for the treatment of trigeminal neuropathic pain
Drug | Dosing regimen | Therapeutic daily dose | Common side effects |
|---|---|---|---|
#Amitriptyline** (ATC code - N06AA09) [310] | in neurology and general practice for disorders other than depression, the drug is prescribed starting at 5–6.25 mg in the evening an hour and a half before sleep, then increasing the dose by 5–6.25 mg every 3–5 days [252] | 75 mg | Sedation, dry mouth, urinary hesitancy, constipation, blurred vision, diplopia, elevated intraocular pressure, memory impairment, tremor, arrhythmia. |
#Duloxetine (ATC code - N06AX21) [249,250] | 30 mg once daily in the morning for 1–2 weeks, then 60 mg once daily in the morning. | 60 mg | Dizziness, sleep disturbance (somnolence or insomnia), dry mouth, nausea, constipation, hyperhidrosis, weight loss. |
#Venlafaxine (ATC code - N06AX16) [248,311,312] | 9.375–18.75 mg 2 times a day at equal time intervals; dose increase by 9.375–18.75 mg every 3–7 days. | 75–225 mg | Nausea, decreased appetite, constipation, weight loss, arterial hypertension, dizziness, insomnia, paresthesia, tremor, blurred vision, sexual dysfunction, sweating, high probability of withdrawal syndrome. |
Comments: special considerations for antidepressant use:
Before initiating antidepressant therapy, it is important to explain the treatment goals, expected effects, and timeline to the patient;
Patients should be warned about temporary adverse effects during the first weeks of administration. Informing the patient about their transient nature will increase treatment adherence;
It is also worthwhile to dispel the patient's main fears associated with antidepressant use, address all counterarguments, and provide a reasoned response.
It is recommended to use a 5% #lidocaine (ATC code - N01BB02) medicated plaster topically on the painful area in patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce pain intensity as adjunctive therapy [312,313].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
It is recommended to use a #lidocaine (ATC code - A01AD11) gel topically on the painful area in patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce pain intensity as adjunctive therapy [314].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
It is recommended to prescribe opioid analgesics (containing one of the following substances: tapentadol** (ATC code - N02AX06), naloxone + oxycodone** (ATC code - N02AA05), tramadol** (ATC code - N02AX02), morphine** (ATC code - N02AA01)) to patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce the intensity of pain syndrome – Table 20 [315–320].
Table 20. Levels of recommendation grades and levels of evidence for opioid analgesics in the treatment of neuropathic pain.
Active substance | GoR | LoE |
|---|---|---|
Tapentadol (ATC code - N02AX06) | C | 2 |
Naloxone + Oxycodone** (ATC code - N02AA05) | A | 1 |
Tramadol** (ATC code - N02AX02) | A | 1 |
Morphine** (ATC code - N02AA01) | A | 1 |
Comments: Special considerations for opioid analgesic use:
Drugs of this group are classified as third-line therapy due to the risk of drug dependence and adverse events with long-term use;
When choosing a drug, one should consider the history of opioid analgesic use and any history of drug dependence;
The drug dosage is selected individually based on the product labeling, tolerability, efficacy, and the presence of concomitant cancer pain in the patient.
It is recommended to prescribe #alpha-lipoic acid** (thioctic acid) (ATC code - A16AX01) to patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain as adjunctive therapy to reduce the intensity of pain syndrome [321].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the recommended daily dose is 600 mg.
Other treatment
It is recommended to provide psychotherapy to patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce levels of anxiety, depression, and pain catastrophizing, and to improve quality of life and functional activity [253,322].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: among psychotherapeutic methods, the following types are used: cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) [255], biofeedback [253], relaxation techniques [255,256], mindfulness [257] and others.
It is recommended to prescribe botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system in patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce the intensity of pain syndrome as adjunctive treatment [242,323,324].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comment: botulinum toxin is used (ATC code – M03AX01) – #botulinum toxin type A** and #botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** preparations in the pain area.
It is recommended to use high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce pain intensity as an adjunctive treatment. Stimulation frequency 5–20 Hz, number of sessions 5–10, stimulation area – primary motor or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [242,243,325].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to prescribe hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for diseases of the peripheral nervous system in patients with trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia and post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce the severity of allodynia and pruritus [326–328].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: at least 10 HBOT sessions are recommended.
Specifics of treatment for post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain caused by radiation injury
It is recommended to prescribe antioxidants (#alpha-tocopherol acetate (ATC code - A11HA03)) to patients with post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain caused by radiation injury for the treatment of clinically significant radiation changes [329–332].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: during the administration of high doses of #alpha-tocopherol acetate (ATC code - A11HA03) (exceeding 400 mg per day), prophylactic treatment for retinol acetate** deficiency (ATC code - D10AD02, R01AX02, S01XA02, A11CA01) should be carried out – simultaneous prescription of retinol** with #alpha-tocopherol acetate**(ATC code - A11HA03) is recommended.
It is recommended to prescribe #pentoxifylline** (ATC code - C04AD03) to patients with post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain caused by radiation injury for the treatment of clinically significant radiation changes [330–332]. Recommendation grade B (level of evidence – 2)
Comments: the recommended dose of the drug is 400 mg 2 times a day for 4–6 weeks.
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is recommended for patients with peripheral nervous system diseases and post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain caused by radiation injury, for the treatment of clinically significant radiation-induced changes [333].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: at least 10 HBOT sessions are recommended.
Glucocorticosteroids (GCS) are recommended for patients with post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain caused by radiation injury, for the treatment of clinically significant radiation-induced changes [334].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: both #dexamethasone** (ATX code - H02AB02) and #prednisolone** (ATX code - H02AB06) can be used in the treatment of clinically significant post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain caused by radiation injury. The decision to prescribe GCS should be made taking into account the benefit-risk ratio for the patient's health, concomitant diseases, and potential complications of GCS therapy. The initial effective dose of dexamethasone is at least 8 mg per day (and no more than 20 mg) per day for 3-5 days, followed by a gradual taper. Administration of prednisolone is possible in equivalent doses.
Surgical treatment
Minimally invasive percutaneous and surgical interventions in patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain
For various types of pharmacoresistant trigeminal neuropathic pain, the following treatment methods are considered:
Radiofrequency ablation of peripheral nerves, plexuses, and autonomic ganglia;
Neurostimulator implantation;
Trigeminal nucleotractotomy.
Neurostimulator implantation is recommended for invasive stimulation of the precentral cerebral cortex in patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce pain intensity when other treatment methods (conservative, minimally invasive, and surgical) are ineffective [335–337].
GCP CLEL 3Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comment: given the delayed onset of the motor cortex stimulation effect, the necessity of test stimulation is a debatable issue. The efficacy of the method is controversial, but the decision on surgical treatment should be made taking into account a combination of factors: the efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation, the patient's psychological state, functional status, the reserve of conservative treatment methods, etc.
Minimally invasive percutaneous and surgical interventions in patients with trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia
Radiofrequency ablation of peripheral nerves, plexuses, and autonomic ganglia in the form of high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) or standard (thermal) radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) of the supraorbital nerve under CT guidance is recommended for patients with trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia in the projection of supraorbital nerve innervation when conservative therapy is insufficiently effective, after a prior diagnostic block of the supraorbital nerve using a local anesthetic with a glucocorticosteroid [338,339].
GGR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 2)
Comments: To support this recommendation, we cite a randomized trial without placebo control [338] and a retrospective case series description [339]. Studies show a high level of safety and efficacy of PRFA and SRFA of the supraorbital nerve within a follow-up range of up to 1 year. The study demonstrated a higher efficacy of high-voltage (65V) supraorbital nerve PRFA compared to 45V PRFA.
Implantation of a peripheral nerve electrical stimulation system for invasive peripheral stimulation of the trigeminal nerve branches is recommended for patients with trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia to reduce pain intensity in case of ineffectiveness/intolerance of conservative treatment or decreased adherence to drug therapy [275,340,341].
GIB CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: a mandatory condition is the performance of test invasive stimulation to determine the efficacy of the method. With adequate pain control during test peripheral stimulation, the patient is offered the implantation of a system for chronic stimulation.
Surgical treatment of post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain
Implantation of a neurostimulator for invasive peripheral electrical stimulation of the trigeminal nerve branches is recommended for patients with post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce pain intensity in case of ineffectiveness/intolerance of conservative treatment or decreased adherence to drug therapy [275,340,342–344].
GIB CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: a mandatory condition is the performance of test invasive stimulation to determine the efficacy of the method. With adequate pain control during test peripheral stimulation, the patient is offered the implantation of a system for chronic stimulation.
Trigeminal nucleotractotomy is recommended for patients with post-traumatic trigeminal neuropathic pain to reduce pain intensity when other treatment methods (conservative, minimally invasive, and surgical) are ineffective [345–347].
GIB CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: microsurgical or percutaneous trigeminal nucleotractotomy can be performed depending on the number and degree of involvement of trigeminal dermatomes. Despite the sufficiently high efficacy of the method, surgical treatment carries a certain risk of temporary and persistent neurological complications.
3.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
3.1.4.1. Cluster headacheCluster headache treatment consists of acute attack treatment and prophylactic treatment.
Treatment of acute cluster headache attacks.
Inhalation of 100% oxygen at a rate of 12 L/min, in some cases 15 L/min, for 20 minutes via a face mask is recommended for patients with cluster headache to abort the attack [348–355].
GGR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence - 1)
Comment: Preference should be given to masks with an oxygen valve to ensure an adequate oxygen flow [350,351]. If home oxygen therapy is not feasible, it can be administered in a day hospital setting with oxygen delivery at a rate of 12-15 L/min for 20 min.
The use of selective 5-HT1 serotonin receptor agonists (ATC code: N02CC) is recommended for patients with a cluster headache attack to abort the attack [356].
GGR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence - 1)
Comment: preference should be given to zolmitriptan (ATC code: N02CC03) at a dose of 5-10 mg intranasally into the contralateral nostril [357], as oral forms are less effective due to a longer onset of drug action.
Instillation of #lidocaine (ATC Code: N01BB02) solution spray, 4 doses into the ipsilateral nostril, with the patient in a semi-recumbent position at a 45° angle and the head turned 30-40° toward the symptomatic side, is recommended for patients with cluster headache to abort the attack [358,359].
GGR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 2)
Comment: instillation of #lidocaine** (ATC Code: N01BB02) can be offered as initial therapy since it causes no side effects, and the duration of action is about 2 hours.
Prophylactic treatment of cluster headache
The goal of prophylactic treatment is to prevent the development of cluster headache attacks and to extend the periods of disease remission.
The use of #verapamil (ATC Code: C08DA01) is recommended in patients with episodic and chronic cluster headache for the prophylaxis of attacks and to increase the remission period [360–362].
GGR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 2)
Comment: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study has established the efficacy of #verapamil for the prophylaxis of cluster headache. In clinical practice, treatment should be initiated with a daily dose of 240 mg (240 mg of sustained-release #verapamil once daily or 80 mg of #verapamil 3 times daily). An ECG must be performed before starting treatment. The dose of #verapamil is increased by 80 mg every 3–4 days. After reaching a daily dose of 480 mg, ECG monitoring should be performed for every additional 160 mg [355]. A gradual dose titration up to 960 mg (four 240 mg tablets) under the supervision of a cardiologist is possible. As a rule, high doses are required for effective treatment; therefore, titration of #verapamil may take from 14 to 21 days. Due to the prolonged titration to an effective dose, the use of #verapamil is debatable in patients with episodic cluster headache with a symptomatic period of 1–3 weeks. #Verapamil is generally well tolerated by patients; possible side effects include fatigue, constipation, and lower extremity edema. Cardiac side effects of #verapamil (negative inotropic and chronotropic effects) pose a major risk; bradycardia and atrioventricular conduction disturbances may also occur. It should be borne in mind that cardiac side effects of #verapamil can also develop in patients on a previously established maintenance dose (periodic ECG monitoring is recommended) [360].
It is recommended to use #prednisolone** (ATX code: H02AB06) during the verapamil titration period in patients with cluster headache or in patients with episodic cluster headache with a symptomatic period of up to 8 weeks for preventive treatment [363].
GCR CLOC 2Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence - 2)
Comment: #Prednisolone** at a dose of 100 mg orally in the morning for 5 days with a gradual dose reduction by 20 mg every 3 days. Upon reaching a dose of 10–20 mg, cluster headache may recur.
It is recommended to use #lithium carbonate (ATX code: N05AN01) in patients with cluster headache for preventive treatment [362,364].
GCR BLOC 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 1)
Comment: #Lithium carbonate is used at a dose of 353–900 mg. Blood plasma lithium levels must be monitored. The minimum therapeutic level is 0.4 mmol/L, 0.6–0.8 mmol/L is considered the ideal level, and reaching a level of 1.2 mmol/L is not recommended. Laboratory monitoring is required before starting treatment. It is necessary to assess blood electrolyte levels (blood sodium assay, blood potassium assay), renal function (general clinical biochemical blood test, including blood urea assay, blood creatinine assay), thyroid hormones (blood thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) assay), and an initial primary appointment (examination, consultation) with an endocrinologist, a complete blood count (with mandatory ESR determination), and then regularly at least once a month, a blood lithium assay 12 hours after taking the last dose, and an ECG are also required.
It is recommended to use #melatonin in patients with cluster headache for preventive treatment [365].
GCR CLOC 2Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence - 2)
Comment: A double-blind controlled study has established the efficacy of #melatonin (ATX code: N05CH01) at a dose of 10 mg for the preventive treatment of cluster headache [365], whereas another case-control study did not confirm the efficacy of melatonin [366].
It is recommended to use #topiramate** (ATX code: N03AX11) in patients with cluster headache for attack prophylaxis [367,368].
GCR CLOC 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence - 3)
Comment: gradual titration of the drug is recommended, starting with 50 mg once daily, followed by an increase in the dose by 25 mg once a week until a dose of 50 mg is reached. In case of insufficient efficacy, a further gradual increase to a dose of 100 mg is possible. The most frequent side effects of #topiramate** are cognitive impairment, weight loss, and paresthesia.
Interventional treatment of cluster headache
It is recommended to periodically perform greater occipital nerve blocks with a local anesthetic solution (ATX code: N01B) with/without a glucocorticoid (ATX code: H02AB) for temporary preventive treatment of episodic and chronic cluster headache in patients with severe cluster headache prior to selecting optimal pharmacotherapy [369,370].
GGR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 2)
Comments: The results of two randomized trials indicate the efficacy of periodic blockade of the occipital nerve with a local anesthetic solution with/without a glucocorticoid for the relief of episodic and chronic cluster headache with daily attacks. The effect persisted for 2–4 weeks; the procedure may be repeated [369,370]. The mechanism of action is based on the temporary suppression of the trigeminal-autonomic reflex through an effect on the interrelated systems of the occipital and trigeminal nerves [371].
It is recommended to perform transnasal non-invasive sphenopalatine ganglion blockade using 10% #lidocaine** (ATX code: N01BB02) for pain attack relief in episodic and chronic cluster headache [372].
GGR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 2)
Comments: The results of a randomized trial indicate a greater efficacy of transnasal non-invasive blockade (using a cotton pledget soaked in the solution inserted into the nasal passage) with 10% #lidocaine compared to placebo. The effect (relief of the attack) occurred within 30–40 minutes and persisted for at least 5 hours [372].
It is recommended to perform radiofrequency ablation of peripheral nerves, plexuses, and autonomic ganglia in the volume of pulsed radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) and/or standard (thermal) radiofrequency ablation of the sphenopalatine ganglion using fluoroscopic or CT guidance for rapid attack relief, as well as preventive treatment of pharmacoresistant episodic cluster headache [373,374].
GCR BLOC 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 3)
Comments: The recommendation is based on the results of 2 retrospective studies. In the study by Sanders M et al., following standard radiofrequency ablation of the sphenopalatine ganglion, complete pain relief was demonstrated in 61% and partial relief in 25% of patients with pharmacoresistant episodic cluster headache over a follow-up period of 29 months [373]. In the study by Fang L et al., pulsed radiofrequency ablation of the sphenopalatine ganglion was used for the same patient category; the procedure was effective in 85% of cases, and during the 17-month follow-up period, patients experienced an extension of the remission period from 8.7 to 16.6 months, as well as a reduction in the cluster period duration from 2 to 0.5 months [374].
It is recommended to perform radiofrequency ablation of peripheral nerves, plexuses, and autonomic ganglia in the volume of standard radiofrequency ablation of the sphenopalatine ganglion using fluoroscopic guidance for attack relief, as well as preventive treatment in patients with pharmacoresistant chronic cluster headache following a positive response (manifested as temporary pain reduction) to a diagnostic sphenopalatine ganglion blockade with a local anesthetic [375][376].
GCR BLOC 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 3)
Comments: In a retrospective study by Narouze S et al., following standard radiofrequency ablation of the sphenopalatine ganglion in patients with chronic cluster headache, a statistically significant reduction was noted in pain intensity, attack frequency, and pain-related disability over 18 months of follow-up after the procedure [375]. A case series presented by Bendersky DC et al. demonstrated the efficacy of standard radiofrequency ablation following the failure of this procedure in pulsed mode in patients with pharmacoresistant cluster headache [376].
Surgical treatment of cluster headache
It is recommended to implant a permanent occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) system for the preventive treatment of patients with pharmacoresistant chronic cluster headache [377–379].
GCR BLOC 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 3)
Comments: The recommendation is based on the results of 3 non-comparative cohort studies. In the study by Miller S et al., following implantation of the ONS system, a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency was achieved in 52.9% of patients with drug-resistant chronic cluster headache [377]. The patients demonstrated a reduction in the duration and intensity of pain attacks, decreased use of triptans for pain relief, as well as improved working capacity and quality of life. In the study by Leone M [378] patients were followed for 6 years after ONS system implantation, and a decrease in cluster headache frequency was observed in 66.7% of patients. In the work by Fontaine D [379] et al., with a 1-year follow-up after ONS initiation, a reduction in attack frequency of more than 30% was noted in 64% of patients, and by more than 50% in 59% of patients; prophylactic medication dosages were reduced in 40% of patients, and a significant improvement in quality of life, functional, and emotional domains was reported.
It is recommended to implant a permanent sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation system for the relief of attacks and prophylactic treatment (reduction of attack frequency) in patients with pharmacoresistant chronic cluster headache [380–383].
GGR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 2)
Comments: The recommendation is based on the results of 2 randomized comparative [381,382] and 1 observational non-comparative [383] studies. In the study by Schoenen J et al., over 70% of patients reported cessation of attacks or a significant decrease in their frequency after implantation of the sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation system. In the study by Goadsby P, in the sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation group, relief within 15 minutes occurred in 62.46% of patients, whereas in the control group only in 38.87% of patients; patients in the sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation group also noted a significant decrease in attack frequency. The work by Barloese M et al. demonstrated that following implantation of the sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation system, 55% of patients with pharmacoresistant chronic cluster headache reported a more than 50% reduction in attack frequency, 67% experienced a significant improvement in quality of life, 67% of patients who took acute medications were able to reduce their use by 52%, and 74% of patients were able to decrease the dosage or completely discontinue prophylactic medications.
3.1.4.2. Paroxysmal hemicraniaConservative treatment
It is recommended to use #indometacin (ATC code: M01AB01) in patients with paroxysmal hemicrania for the treatment and prevention of attacks [384,385].
GOMR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence - 2)
Comment: The maximum daily dose of #indometacin (ATC code: M01AB01) is 250 mg.
3.1.4.3. Short-lasting unilateral neuralgical headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCT syndrome) and short-lasting unilateral neuralgical headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms (SUNA syndrome)Since SUNCT and SUNA attacks are very brief, no treatments for individual attacks have been developed. The goal of therapy is the prevention of attack onset.
Recommended is the use of #lamotrigine (ATC code: N03AX09) in patients with SUNCT for long-term prophylactic treatment of SUNCT [386,387].
Leveled CEvid 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence reliability - 4)
Comment: titration of #lamotrigine should be started at a dose of 50 mg per day and gradually increased, based on the response and side effects. Nevertheless, #lamotrigine treatment was not as effective in patients with SUNA.
It is recommended to use #gabapentin (ATC code: N03AX12) in patients with SUNCT for seizure prophylaxis [388,389].
Leveled CEvid 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence reliability - 4)
Comment: starting dose is 300 mg with further increases of 300 mg every 3 days up to a maximum of 4200 mg.
It is recommended to use other antiepileptic drugs (ATC code: N03AX12) in patients with SUNA for seizure prophylaxis [390].
Leveled CEvid 5Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence reliability - 5)
It is recommended to administer intravenous #lidocaine** (ATC code: N01BB02) in patients during SUNCT exacerbations, for the period of selecting prophylactic therapy [391–393].
Leveled CEvid 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence reliability - 4)
Comments: In one case, it was reported that the positive effect of #lidocaine** administered via intravenous infusion at a dose of 1.3 mg/kg/hour for 14 days persisted for 2 months after the end of the infusion [392].
3.1.4.4. Hemicrania continuaIt is recommended to prescribe #indometacin (ATX code: M01AB01) to patients with hemicrania continua for the treatment of pain syndrome [394].
GRR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence - 2)
Comment: The standard therapeutic dose of #indometacin is 25 mg 3 times a day for 5-7 days; in case of inefficacy, the dose is increased to 50 mg 3 times a day for 5-7 days; in case of further inefficacy, 75 mg 3 times a day for 2 weeks. However, given potential gastrointestinal side effects, it is recommended to start titration with low doses.
3.2. Facial nerve disorders
3.2.1. Facial neuropathy
Medical treatment
In the treatment of patients with idiopathic facial neuropathy (Bell's palsy), most authors confirm the efficacy of glucocorticosteroid and antiviral therapy; symptomatic treatment is prescribed depending on the etiology of the disease. Isolated studies recommend the use of B vitamins, thioctic acid. At the same time, physical rehabilitation plays a major role (Appendix B6).
Bell's palsy
It is recommended to prescribe glucocorticosteroid drugs early (optimally within the first 72 hours from symptom onset) to patients with idiopathic facial neuropathy regardless of disease severity in order to reduce edema and improve disease outcome [395–397].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: Treatment with glucocorticosteroids increases the rate of complete recovery of nerve function by 17% and should be prescribed as early as possible regardless of disease severity, since muscle weakness may increase in the first few days [395]. The drugs of choice are #prednisolone** (ATX code – H02AB06) and #methylprednisolone** (ATX code – H02AB04). Recommended doses in clinical practice vary [398]. #Prednisolone** is recommended for oral administration at a total daily dose of 60 mg for the first 5 days, followed by a gradual taper of 10 mg per day over the next 5 days [121,399–401] or 1 mg/kg of the patient's weight for 7–10 days; in severe cases (House-Brackmann grade V-VI) and in the absence of contraindications, 2 mg/kg of the patient's weight per day may be prescribed for 10 days [115]. In accordance with the drug instructions, the entire daily dose is taken once in the morning at 6:00–8:00 after a meal, or it can be divided into 2 doses in the first half of the day. In cases where treatment is initiated within 3 days and the severity of facial neuropathy is higher than grade IV according to the House-Brackmann scale, preference should be given to a single intravenous administration of #methylprednisolone** at a dose of 500 mg instead of oral prednisolone [396,399–401]. Daily intratympanic administration of glucocorticosteroids for up to 10 days combined with systemic therapy may improve the outcome, but data are still insufficient and RCTs are needed [402] (LOE - 1).
It is recommended to prescribe systemic antiviral agents to patients with idiopathic facial neuropathy for pathogenetic treatment [403–405].
GGR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: Systemic antiviral agents are prescribed in combination with glucocorticosteroids because, according to the viral hypothesis, idiopathic facial neuropathy is associated with infection caused by Herpes zoster, shingles[403,404](as monotherapy they have not shown efficacy[406–408]), in the early stages of the disease in patients with severe facial neuropathy and/or confirmed viral infection[120,121]. The drugs of choice are aciclovir** (ATX code – J05AB01) and valaciclovir (ATX code – J05AB11) [115], prescribed in accordance with the instructions for use. In most studies, the recommended dosing regimen for aciclovir is 800 mg 5 times a day, and for valaciclovir – 1000 mg 3 times a day[409].
Ramsay Hunt syndrome
It is recommended to initiate early combination therapy with glucocorticosteroids and systemic antiviral agents in patients with Ramsay Hunt syndrome [410].
GRR CLOE 1Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: Systemic antiviral drugs are prescribed in combination with glucocorticosteroids – #prednisolone** (ATX code – H02AB06) or #methylprednisolone** (ATX code – H02AB04) as a 7-day course [115].
Lyme disease (borreliosis)
It is recommended to prescribe systemic antibacterial drugs early to patients with facial neuropathy when a bacterial etiology of the disease (Lyme disease) is suspected [411].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: "Standard" antibacterial therapy for Lyme disease includes doxycycline** (ATX code - J01AA02), amoxicillin** (ATX code - J01CA04), or cefuroxime** (ATX code - J01DC02) in accordance with the instructions for use.
It is recommended to prescribe nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs in the presence of muscle pain [82,412].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: it is advisable to prescribe ibuprofen** (ATX code – M01AE01) in accordance with the instructions for use [290,413].
It is recommended to prescribe a complex of group B vitamins, including combinations with other drugs, to patients with facial neuropathy in order to improve metabolic processes in the nervous system [414,415].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Botulinum therapy
Botulinum therapy is performed in patients during the acute and chronic periods of the disease [416].
In the acute period of facial neuropathy, botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections are performed into the muscles of the healthy half of the face in cases of muscle hypertonus development or a high risk of its development due to active mimic activity, which leads to a shift in the midline of the face and worsens the prognosis for functional recovery. The main goal is to restore facial symmetry [82,417,418]. It is advisable to use BoNT in the acute period of facial neuropathy after neurosurgical operations [98,419].
In the chronic period of facial neuropathy, BoNT injections are performed on the affected side to treat synkinesias (post-paralytic hemifascial spasm), while the drug is also administered to the healthy side to achieve facial symmetry [97,420,421]. On average, the interval between injections is 5 months. In most studies, injections are performed into the orbicularis oculi and orbicularis oris muscles [418,422]. Achieving an optimal clinical effect in the treatment of synkinesias is made possible by chemical denervation of the lower portion of the palpebral part of the orbicularis oculi muscle, the buccinator muscle, the perinasal muscles, and the platysma [101,423–425]. Adverse effects may include hematoma, excessive weakness of the injected muscle, or weakness of an adjacent muscle (diplopia/speech impairment) [422]. Botulinum therapy is more effective when combined with physical rehabilitation [82].
It is recommended to prescribe botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system to patients with moderate to severe facial muscle hypertonus on the healthy side in idiopathic and symptomatic facial neuropathy [99].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comment: Relaxation of facial muscles is performed on the conventionally healthy side, as an additional method to the standard set of exercise therapy (which is prescribed depending on the severity of paresis). Botulinum toxin (ATX code – M03AX01) – #botulinum toxin type A** and botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** preparations – is administered intramuscularly into the muscles of the contralateral side of the face in a total dose of up to 50 IU.
It is recommended to prescribe botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system to patients with moderate to severe facial muscle hypertonus on the affected side (a complication of idiopathic and symptomatic facial neuropathy) [101].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comment: Relaxation of facial muscles is performed on both sides, as an additional method to the standard set of exercise therapy (which is prescribed depending on the severity of paresis) [101]. The drug brand, dose, time interval, and injection sites are selected [422]. Botulinum toxin (ATX code – M03AX01) – botulinum toxin type A** or botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** preparations – is administered intramuscularly into the muscles of the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of the face in a total dose of up to 100 IU.
It is recommended to prescribe botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system to patients with secondary hemifacial spasm following idiopathic and symptomatic facial neuropathy (post-paralytic hemifascial spasm) of moderate and severe degree [101].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comment: Relaxation of facial muscles is performed on both sides, as an additional method to the standard set of exercise therapy (which is prescribed depending on the severity of paresis) [101]. The drug brand, dose, time interval, and injection sites are selected [422]. Botulinum toxin (ATX code – M03AX01) – botulinum toxin type A** or botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** preparations – is administered intramuscularly into the muscles of the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of the face in a total dose of up to 100 IU.
It is recommended to prescribe botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system to patients with facial muscle hypertonus on the healthy side in lesions of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve in order to correct facial symmetry and create conditions for recovery [426].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: injections are performed on the healthy side into the depressor anguli oris / depressor labii inferioris muscle; botulinum toxin (ATX code – M03AX01) – #botulinum toxin type A** or botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** preparations – is administered intramuscularly at a dose of 5 IU at a single point [426] or at a dose of 2 IU at 2 points [184].
Prevention and treatment of lagophthalmos symptom and its complications
In facial neuropathy, lagophthalmos—incomplete eyelid closure—is one of the frequent symptoms, leading to ophthalmological complications such as keratitis and corneal ulcers, up to the loss of vision. Main objectives:
restoration of the integrity of the tear film (moisturization),
restoration of eyelid closure – see Medical rehabilitation in facial neuropathy, Appendix B7 [102,119].
It is recommended that a neurologist make an early prescription of local therapy—other drugs used in ophthalmology, artificial tears, and other indifferent preparations in various forms (eye drops, gels) for systematic use with a frequency of up to several times a day and at night for patients with uncomplicated lagophthalmos symptom in facial neuropathy in order to moisturize the eyeball and prevent ophthalmological complications [427,428].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the most frequent regimen is the daytime instillation of artificial tear drops and other indifferent preparations (ATX code – S01XA20) in accordance with the instructions; at night – dexpanthenol (ATX code – S01XA12) in accordance with the instructions [102,119].
Surgical treatment
In facial neuropathy, the method of surgical treatment is determined by the time elapsed from symptom onset, anatomical level (localization) of the lesion, etiology, severity, and clinical manifestations (severity of dysfunction and deformity) (Figure 8). Surgical treatment is classified into pathogenetic—aimed at eliminating the cause of the disease; and symptomatic—aimed at improving the outcome (Appendix B8).
In patients with facial neuropathy of the idiopathic form, pathogenetic surgical treatment is facial nerve decompression in the temporal bone canal, which is performed only in cases of severe nerve damage established clinically (grade V-VI on the House-Brackmann scale) and instrumentally confirmed (difference in M-wave amplitudes of the affected and healthy sides greater than 90% according to stimulation electroneuromyography [ENMG]). Patients with an M-wave amplitude difference greater than 90% must undergo EMG with registration of motor unit potentials (MUPs). The absence of MUPs according to EMG data is regarded as a sign of complete damage to the facial nerve trunk with an unfavorable prognosis for spontaneous recovery, which is an indication for surgical treatment [429].
In patients with facial neuropathy, symptomatic surgical treatment, regardless of the disease form (idiopathic or symptomatic), is a reinnervating operation (neuroplasty) or reconstructive-plastic surgery, which are also performed only in cases of severe nerve damage (Appendix B9) [177]. Surgical treatment (reinnervation of facial muscles) is indicated in the absence of positive dynamics within 6 months from symptom onset and the absence of dynamics according to myography data; it can be performed after pathogenetic surgical treatment.

Figure 8. Surgical treatment of patients with facial nerve lesions
The essence of reinnervating procedures lies in restoring the function of the facial muscles by restoring the anatomical integrity of the facial nerve (Table 21). If restoring the anatomical integrity of the facial nerve is not possible, peripheral anastomoses must be formed between the facial nerve (cranial nerve VII) and regional nerves in the maxillofacial region: the hypoglossal nerve (CN XII) to CN VII, the masseteric nerve (CN V), as well as cross-face reinnervation using the facial nerve from the healthy side. The timeframe for such surgery is up to 2 years (optimally up to 18 months) from symptom onset.
The essence of reconstructive and plastic surgery consists of a two-stage microsurgical treatment (myoneuroplasty). Specifically, the first stage involves harvesting an autologous graft from a donor site (sural nerve or superficial peroneal nerve) and routing it from the healthy side to the affected side. A key feature of the surgery is preparing the recipient nerve for the reinnervation of the transferred muscle. It is necessary to adhere to the rules for restoring the anatomical and functional integrity of the innervation zone, with an emphasis on establishing myodynamic balance. Surgical treatment for patients with severe facial nerve neuropathy is fundamental, but only a comprehensive approach with timely and systematic specialized care can ensure optimal functional and aesthetic treatment outcomes and complete rehabilitation for patients [82,177,430].
Table 21. Patient categories and types of symptomatic surgical treatment for facial nerve lesions
Idiopathic and symptomatic forms of facial nerve neuropathy | Type of surgical treatment | Objective of surgical treatment |
|---|---|---|
severe degree with a disease duration of up to 18 months | Reinnervating procedures | Restoration of native facial muscle function |
severe degree with a disease duration of more than 18 months | Reconstructive and plastic surgery (muscle autotransplantation) | Replacement of the function of atrophied facial muscles |
post-paralytic hemifacial spasm (pronounced synkinesis) | Selective neurotomy, selective neurorrhaphy, neurolysis, | Formation of a natural smile by decoupling movements between multiple muscle groups |
lagophthalmos | Surgical treatment of lagophthalmos (neuroplastic, dynamic, and static methods) | Restoration of orbicularis oculi function, simulation of orbicularis oculi function |
Idiopathic facial nerve neuropathy (Bell's palsy)
It is recommended to perform neurolysis and facial nerve decompression (decompression of the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve) in patients with idiopathic facial nerve neuropathy and a severe grade of impairment to improve disease outcomes [92,209].
LoR CGoE 1Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: The procedure requires careful patient selection. The diagnosis of Bell's palsy must be reliably established based on a comprehensive clinical and instrumental assessment, specifically: the severity of damage according to the House-Brackmann (HB) scale must correspond to grade V–VI; stimulation electroneurography (ENMG) must show an amplitude difference of the M-wave between the affected and healthy sides exceeding 90%; recurrent neuropathies and other causes of facial nerve injury must be excluded [92] (LoE - 1). Surgical decompression of the facial nerve is recommended to be performed within 14 days, preferably via the middle cranial fossa approach compared to the transmastoid approach [209] (LoE - 1). However, the procedure requires careful patient selection and preoperative preparation, which takes time. Surgical decompression can be performed up to 3 months from symptom onset [210–212]. If positive dynamics (clinical or myographic) are observed during this period, surgical treatment is not performed.
It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the temporal bone in patients presenting with clinical signs of facial nerve neuropathy prior to neurolysis and facial nerve decompression (decompression of the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve) to evaluate the anatomical landmarks of the temporal bone pyramid and plan the surgical approach [431].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform pure-tone audiometry in patients presenting with clinical signs of facial nerve neuropathy prior to neurolysis and facial nerve decompression (decompression of the labyrinthine segment of the facial nerve) to assess hearing [212,431,432].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: the risk of ipsilateral hearing loss with this type of surgical intervention is 2–5% [212].
Idiopathic or symptomatic facial nerve neuropathy
It is recommended to perform a reinnervating procedure (neurorrhaphy) in patients with facial nerve neuropathy and a severe grade of impairment from 3 months up to 2 years after symptom onset (optimally up to 18 months) to improve disease outcomes [213,214,220–226].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: The severity of facial nerve damage is established based on a comprehensive clinical and instrumental assessment, specifically: the severity of injury according to the House-Brackmann scale must correspond to grade V–VI, and stimulation ENMG must show an amplitude difference of the M-wave between the affected and healthy sides exceeding 90%. The presence or absence of muscle atrophy according to ultrasound or MRI is taken into account.
It is recommended to perform a reconstructive and plastic procedure (free transfer or transposition of donor muscles via autotransplantation) in patients with facial nerve neuropathy and a severe grade of impairment more than 2 years after symptom onset to improve disease outcomes [215–219,227].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: The severity of facial nerve damage is established based on a comprehensive clinical and instrumental assessment, specifically: the severity of injury according to the House-Brackmann scale must correspond to grade V–VI, and stimulation ENMG must show an amplitude difference of the M-wave between the affected and healthy sides exceeding 90%. The presence or absence of muscle atrophy according to ultrasound or MRI is taken into account.
It is recommended to perform neurolysis, neurorrhaphy, neurotomy, or myotomy in patients with sequelae of facial nerve neuropathy—pronounced post-paralytic hemifacial spasm (multiple synkinesias)—with the aim of eliminating involuntary movements [228–230].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: taking into account side effects such as facial muscle weakness, careful patient selection is required.
Surgical treatment methods for patients with prosoplegia
It is recommended to perform side-to-end CN XII-VII neurorrhaphy using a great auricular nerve interposition graft, end-to-end neurorrhaphy using the mylohyoid branch, or end-to-end neurorrhaphy using the masseteric branch in patients with facial nerve neuropathy due to intracranial facial nerve injury of up to 2 years' standing and facial muscle prosoplegia, with the aim of providing "emergency assistance" in restoring peripheral facial nerve conduction using a donor nerve [213,214,220].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform end-to-end CN XII-VII neurorrhaphy using the sural nerve or end-to-end sural nerve neurorrhaphy as a form of myoneurotization in patients with facial nerve neuropathy lacking symmetrical synchronous movements, with the aim of synchronizing and enhancing facial muscle movement using the unaffected side of the face [220,433–435].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform side-to-end CN XII-VII neurorrhaphy using a great auricular nerve interposition graft, end-to-end neurorrhaphy using the masseteric branch, or a peripheral end-to-end CN V-VII anastomosis using the mylohyoid branch in patients with facial nerve neuropathy due to extracranial facial nerve injury with preservation of the trunk and branches of up to 2 years' standing and prosoplegia, with the aim of providing "emergency assistance" in restoring peripheral facial nerve conduction using a donor nerve [213,214,220–226].
LoE 4Level of evidence C (level of data validity – 4)
It is recommended to perform exploration of the facial nerve trunk and branches with the formation of great auricular and/or sural nerve interposition grafts (direct neurorrhaphy), side-to-end CN XII-VII neurorrhaphy using sural and/or great auricular nerve grafts, or end-to-end neurorrhaphy using the masseteric branch and great auricular and/or sural nerve grafts in patients with facial nerve neuropathy due to extracranial facial nerve injury without preservation of the trunk and branches of up to 2 years' standing and prosoplegia, with the aim of providing "emergency assistance" in restoring peripheral facial nerve conduction using a donor nerve [213,214,220–226].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform free transfer or transposition of donor muscles via autotransplantation with simultaneous reinnervation by the masseteric branch of the trigeminal nerve with cross-face nerve grafting, or transposition of the masseter muscles with simultaneous reinnervation with cross-face grafting in patients with facial nerve neuropathy due to intracranial facial nerve injury of more than 2 years' standing, prosoplegia, and facial muscle atrophy, with the aim of restoring static facial symmetry [215–219,227].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform static correction using fascia lata and/or temporal fascia in patients with facial nerve neuropathy due to intracranial facial nerve injury of more than 2 years' standing, prosoplegia, and facial muscle atrophy in cases where free transfer or transposition of donor muscles is not feasible [216,436].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: in cases of contraindications to surgical treatment or if the patient refuses, static correction using threads is possible.
Surgical treatment methods for patients with facial nerve palsy
It is recommended to perform side-to-side XII-VII cranial nerve neurorrhaphy using a great auricular nerve graft, end-to-side V-VII cranial nerve neurorrhaphy using the mylohyoid or masseter branch, end-to-side VII-VII cranial nerve neurorrhaphy using the sural nerve, or neurorrhaphy combined with myoneurotization in patients with facial neuropathy due to intracranial facial nerve injury for the purpose of "first aid" in enhancing facial nerve conduction at the peripheral level using a donor nerve [220,434,435].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform revision of the facial nerve trunk and branches (neurolysis, neurorrhaphy), end-to-side VII-VII cranial nerve neurorrhaphy using the sural nerve or sural nerve in the manner of myoneurotization, revision of the facial nerve trunk and branches with the formation of great auricular and/or sural nerve grafts (direct neurorrhaphy), or a combination of various types of neurorrhaphy with cross-plasty in patients with facial neuropathy due to extracranial facial nerve injury to restore the anatomical and functional integrity of the facial nerve [220,433–435].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform selective myotomy on the healthy half of the face, end-to-side VII-VII cranial nerve neurorrhaphy using the sural nerve or sural nerve in the manner of myoneurotization, or selective neurotomy on the healthy half of the face using intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in patients with facial neuropathy and contractures of the healthy side of the face for the purpose of temporary elimination of facial muscle hypertonus, taking into account the regeneration of formed neurorrhaphies [423,433,435,437].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform end-to-side VII-VII cranial nerve neurorrhaphy using the sural nerve in the manner of myoneurotization, selective neurotomy using intraoperative facial nerve monitoring, selective myotomy, and end-to-side VII-VII cranial nerve neurorrhaphy using the sural nerve in patients with facial neuropathy and contractures and synkinesias of the affected side of the face for the purpose of eliminating contracture and decoupling associated movements of the facial muscles [77,423,433–435,437].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform static correction using strips of temporal and/or femoral fascia or static correction in the manner of a circular facelift in patients with facial neuropathy and prosoparesis for the purpose of temporary correction of tissue ptosis for aesthetic purposes [423,433,436,437].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Surgical treatment methods for patients with paralytic lagophthalmos
It is recommended to correct upper eyelid retraction and lagophthalmos of varying degrees of severity in patients with post-paralytic lagophthalmos of more than 2 years' duration to restore eyelid closure [216,438].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Treatment methods for paralytic lagophthalmos include: upper eyelid gold weight implantation, skin-cartilage graft from the auricle, lateral and medial canthopexy using temporal fascia and/or auricular cartilage, blepharorrhaphy, correction of upper eyelid retraction using temporal fascia, correction of upper eyelid retraction using auricular cartilage, lateral and medial canthopexy.
3.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
Medical treatment
It is recommended to use drugs #carbamazepine** (ATC code – N03AF01), #gabapentin (ATC code – N03AX12), #clonazepam** (ATC code – N03AE01); #diazepam** (ATC code – N05BA01), #lorazepam** (ATC code – N05BA06), #baclofen** (ATC code – M03BX01), #levetiracetam** (ATC code – N03AX14), #zonisamide** (ATC code – N03AX15) in patients with hemifacial spasm in the absence of indications for surgical treatment, the presence of contraindications to it, or if the patient refuses surgery, as well as in cases of ineffectiveness of botulinum therapy for the purpose of relieving spasm symptoms [439–441].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: The presented drugs have unproven efficacy in relieving spasm and have side effects such as excessive sedation and fatigue. The standard dosage for these drugs is: #carbamazepine** 400-1200 mg per day, #gabapentin 600-1200 mg per day, #clonazepam** 0.5-4 mg per day, other benzodiazepines (#diazepam** and #lorazepam**) in equivalent doses, #baclofen** 15-80 mg per day, #levetiracetam** 500-1500 mg per day, #zonisamide** 150 mg 2 times a day for 6 weeks [440,441].
Botulinum therapy
In primary and secondary hemifacial spasm, first-line treatment is the administration of botulinum toxin, which is confirmed by numerous clinical studies [15]. Botulinum therapy for hemifacial spasm has symptomatic and pathophysiological mechanisms of action. On the one hand, by blocking neuromuscular transmission, injections suppress myoclonic hyperkinesia. On the other hand, by suppressing muscle hyperactivity, botulinum therapy prevents the formation of hyperexcitability, sensitization, and neuroplasticity at the nuclear and supranuclear levels of facial muscle innervation. Based on these circumstances, botulinum toxin type A injections should be prescribed at the stages of minimal spasm manifestations and short disease duration [15]. Injections are performed into the facial muscles on both sides in order to not only reduce the clinical manifestations of spasm, but also to improve symmetry [442,443]. Target muscles in hemifacial spasm are the orbicularis oculi, buccinator, and platysma. When injecting into the zygomatic muscles, there is a high risk of developing smile asymmetry; into the orbicularis oris – lip biting, speech and eating disorders [15]. In 76-100% of patients with hemifacial spasm, clinical improvement occurs within 7 days after drug administration with an effect duration of up to 90 days; the recommended interval between injections is starting from 3 months [15].
It is recommended to prescribe botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system in patients with hemifacial spasm (primary, secondary, idiopathic) to reduce its clinical manifestations and improve facial symmetry [442–444].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Botulinum toxin (ATC code – M03AX01) – botulinum toxin type A** and botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** preparations in a total dose of up to 100 IU are injected intramuscularly into the muscles of the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of the face.
It is recommended to prescribe botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system in patients with hemifacial spasm upon the return of hemifacial spasm symptoms after vascular decompression to reduce its clinical manifestations and improve facial symmetry [445,446].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Botulinum toxin (ATC code – M03AX01) – botulinum toxin type A** and botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** preparations in a total dose of up to 100 IU are injected intramuscularly into the muscles of the ipsilateral and contralateral sides of the face.
Surgical treatment
In patients with primary hemifacial spasm in the presence of confirmed neurovascular conflict according to MRI data, vascular decompression is performed as the only pathogenetically substantiated treatment method; the essence of the operation is the separation of the vessel and the nerve (Appendix B10) [49].
In patients with secondary hemifacial spasm the type of surgical intervention is determined by its cause. Thus, in case of nerve compression by a space-occupying lesion, removal of the space-occupying lesion is performed (pathogenetic treatment). If hemifacial spasm developed after previous facial neuropathy, selective neurotomy, selective neurorrhaphy, or neurolysis are performed to reduce spasm severity (symptomatic treatment) – see surgical treatment for facial neuropathy.

Figure 8. Surgical treatment of patients with facial nerve lesions
It is recommended to perform cranial nerve (facial) root decompression in patients with primary hemifacial spasm when neurovascular conflict is confirmed by MRI data for the purpose of separating the vessel and the nerve [231,232].
GCR BLoE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: Contraindications to surgical treatment include: severe comorbid pathology preventing surgical intervention or the patient's refusal of surgical intervention [49]. When observing patients for 1 year, recovery occurred in more than 90% of patients [231].
It is recommended to use intraoperative Lateral Spread Recording monitoring during cranial nerve (facial) root decompression in patients with primary hemifacial spasm to improve surgical outcomes [447].
GCR BLoE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
It is recommended to consider radiosurgical treatment (stereotactically guided teletherapy) in patients with primary and idiopathic hemifacial spasm in cases where open surgical treatment is not indicated, contraindicated, or refused by the patient, when symptoms persist after treatment, and when treatment with botulinum toxin and other medications is ineffective [448].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: the target in radiosurgical treatment is the facial nerve at the section immediately before its entry into the internal acoustic meatus. The recommended dose is 8 Gy once or 15 Gy in 5 fractions of 3 Gy each.
3.2.3. Facial myokymia
Medical treatment
Physical and emotional rest, reduction in caffeine intake, and elimination of triggering factors are recommended for patients with primary facial myokymia in order to relieve the spasm [16].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Primary facial myokymia resolves within a few days or weeks with rest and the elimination of triggering factors (smoking, alcohol, and caffeine consumption). Secondary facial myokymia is managed by treating the underlying condition.
Botulinum therapy
It is recommended to prescribe botulinum toxin for diseases of the peripheral nervous system in patients with facial myokymia lasting for more than 3 months in order to reduce clinical symptoms [16].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
Comments: in facial myokymia lasting more than 3 months, other causes of facial nerve lesion must first be excluded. Botulinum toxin type A (BTX) injection therapy is symptomatic. A single or, if necessary, repeated dose of 5–20 IU of BTX is injected into the hyperkinetic muscle (in eyelid myokymia, into the orbicularis oculi muscle). Medications used include #botulinum toxin type A** and #botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex**.
Surgical treatment
Surgical treatment is not indicated.
3.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
Recommended are three treatment approaches: conservative therapy, minimally invasive interventions, and surgical procedures [79,80]. Conservative treatment includes prophylactic therapy and relief of acute pain attacks.
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Conservative therapy
Preventative drug treatment
It is recommended to prescribe #Carbamazepine** (ATX code - N03AF01) to patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia for prophylactic treatment [449].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: the drug is prescribed according to the dosing rules for trigeminal neuralgia; the average therapeutic dose in patients with glossopharyngeal neuropathy is 100–2000 mg per day.
It is recommended to prescribe #Oxcarbazepine** (ATX code - N03AF02) to patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia for prophylactic treatment [450].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: the drug should be prescribed starting at 300 mg per day with a gradual increase up to 1200 mg per day.
It is recommended to prescribe #Gabapentin (ATX code - N02BF01, N03AX12) to patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia for prophylactic treatment [449].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: the drug is prescribed according to the dosing rules for trigeminal neuralgia; the average therapeutic dose in patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia is 100–5000 mg per day.
General recommendations for the management of patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia include:
When choosing a drug, contraindications for use and individual tolerance should be taken into account. To improve treatment tolerability, the drug may be switched to a generic with the same active substance and dose;
To assess tolerability, treatment should be initiated with monotherapy. If combination therapy is necessary, drugs should be prescribed sequentially to evaluate the tolerability of each.
Other preventive treatments
It is recommended to perform injections of #botulinum toxin type A** or #botulinum toxin type A–hemagglutinin complex** (ATX code - M03AX01) in patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia as additional preventive treatment at 1.25–5 IU intradermally into pericranial and neck muscles, up to 25–100 IU [451].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Minimally invasive intervention in patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia
Minimally invasive intervention in patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia
It is recommended to perform radiofrequency ablation of peripheral nerves, plexuses, and autonomic ganglia in the volume of pulsed radiofrequency ablation of the glossopharyngeal nerve under CT or ultrasound guidance in patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia [452]
LeR BLoE 3Level of recommendation validity B (level of evidence validity - 3)
It is recommended to perform a glossopharyngeal nerve block in the projection of the styloid process under CT or ultrasound guidance in patients with glossopharyngeal neuralgia [453].
LeR BLoE 3Level of recommendation validity B (level of evidence validity - 3)
Surgical treatment
Surgical intervention is considered in cases of pharmacoresistant pain syndrome and impaired patient quality of life. The patient must be informed in a timely manner about the possibilities of surgical treatment and referred to a neurosurgical center.
Surgical treatment should be performed in specialized neurosurgical departments with experience in brain surgery and glossopharyngeal neuralgia operations.
It is recommended to perform neurosurgical treatment in the form of microvascular decompression of the glossopharyngeal nerve root in patients with a pharmacoresistant course of primary glossopharyngeal neuralgia [234,454,455].
GCR CLEL 3Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 3)
Comment: A comparative study was conducted on the efficacy of microvascular decompression of the glossopharyngeal nerve root versus microvascular decompression with simultaneous rhizotomy. No statistically significant differences were found regarding pain control and complications [456].
It is recommended to perform stereotactic brain surgery – irradiation of the glossopharyngeal nerve root in patients with idiopathic or classical glossopharyngeal neuralgia if microvascular decompression is not feasible, including patient refusal of surgical treatment [457].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comment: Irradiation using a Gamma Knife is preferred; treatment using linear accelerators with stereotactic radiosurgery capabilities is also acceptable.
It is recommended to perform rhizotomy (microsurgical partial (sensory) rhizotomy) of the glossopharyngeal nerve root if microvascular decompression is not feasible, in order to reduce pain intensity [458].
GCR CLEL 3Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 3)
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
4.1. Trigeminal nerve disorders
4.1.1. Trigeminal neuralgia
Patient information (Appendix B1).
4.1.2. Atypical facial pain
Data not available.
4.1.3. Other trigeminal nerve disorders, unspecified trigeminal nerve disorder
Data not available.
4.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Patient information (Appendix B2).
4.2. Facial nerve disorders
4.2.1. Facial neuropathy
Physical rehabilitation measures consist of:
1. discussing the disease, its clinical course options, potential complications, and prevention measures with the patient,
2. discussing the importance of self-rehabilitation and limiting factors that may worsen the course of the disease (heat exposure, rough massage, electrical stimulation, avoiding active facial expressions and intensive exercise therapy within the maximum active range of motion, etc.) with the patient,
2. prescribing a standard set of therapeutic exercises depending on the degree of facial muscle paresis,
3. prescribing an additional set of therapeutic exercises depending on the presence and severity of complications (muscle hypertonicity, synkinesis),
4. prescribing an additional set of therapeutic exercises depending on the presence and severity of lagophthalmos,
5. training self-monitoring skills for the development or worsening of facial nerve palsy complications,
6. rehabilitation using external physical factors [459].
The standard set of therapeutic exercises depends on the degree of muscle paresis (Appendix B5, Appendix B3), and in severe facial nerve palsy (grade V-VI on the House-Brackmann scale) includes:
"positional treatment" using adhesive tape tension or kinesio taping to "lift the muscles" and restore the facial midline;
massage / self-massage to improve muscle blood supply;
passive exercises mimicking muscle contraction to prevent the development of contractures;
in mild or moderate facial nerve palsy (up to grade IV on the House-Brackmann scale), it includes:
massage / self-massage to improve muscle blood supply;
active exercises with metered symmetrical load mimicking muscle contraction, aimed at increasing the range of motion, strength, endurance, and contraction speed characteristics. An important condition is symmetrical contraction (adjusting the healthy side of the face to the affected one).
It should be noted that when conducting physical rehabilitation in general, all methods are grouped into 2 approaches:
active – when the patient actively moves their own muscles during exercises (specific muscle strengthening, including using biofeedback),
passive – when muscle movement is facilitated by an external force—a person or a device (massage, muscle stretching) [120,460].
The additional set of therapeutic exercises depends on the presence and severity of complications (muscle hypertonicity, synkinesis) (Appendix B3)
The patient is informed that the most frequent complications of facial nerve palsy are muscle hypertonicity on the healthy or on the affected side prior to the development of contractures, and pathological synkinesis prior to the development of post-paralytic lagophthalmos. Self-monitoring methods for their development are explained, enabling the detection of complications at the reversible stage.
To prevent the development of muscle hypertonicity and synkinesis or in mild cases, stretching of the corresponding muscles is performed (relaxation with elements of post-isometric relaxation and buccal massage) [82]. In moderate or severe cases, botulinum toxin type A injections are additionally administered [418]. If complications develop on the conventionally unaffected side, muscle relaxation (via physical rehabilitation or botulinum toxin therapy) is performed only on the unaffected side [99]; if complications develop on the affected side, it is performed bilaterally to preserve facial symmetry (Appendix B5) [101].
When synkinesia develops, a number of authors consider botulinum toxin therapy combined with physical rehabilitation as the first-line therapy, including gentle massage, muscle relaxation techniques, and exercises aimed at neuromuscular re-education, i.e., movement control exercises [54].
It is recommended to perform medical rehabilitation services for a patient with diseases of the peripheral nervous system in facial nerve palsy (FNP) in the acute and chronic period in order to improve the disease outcome [460,461].
GGR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: Physical rehabilitation includes medical facial massage, facial muscle stretching and relaxation exercises, facial and neck muscle strengthening exercises, neuromuscular re-education, and the use of biofeedback.
It is recommended to use medical fixing devices (kinesio tape) during rehabilitation in patients with severe facial nerve neuropathy (grade V-VI on the HB scale) to fix the position of the muscles on the affected side of the face, prevent their overstretching (positional treatment), restore facial symmetry, and improve disease outcomes [462].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to determine the motor regimen, determine rehabilitation potential, draw up a therapeutic exercise course plan, and prescribe a set of exercises (therapeutic exercises), specifically using a set of passive exercises during rehabilitation for patients with severe facial nerve neuropathy (grade V-VI on the HB scale) and a set of active exercises with metered muscle contraction for patients with moderate or mild facial nerve neuropathy (grade IV or less on the HB scale) to strengthen the muscles of the ipsilateral side and improve disease outcomes [463,464].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
Comments: Active exercise therapy is not recommended for patients with severe facial nerve neuropathy because the muscle strength of the affected side is insufficient to produce movement; meanwhile, the unaffected side takes on hyperfunction, and the muscles become active, shorten, and shift the midline of the face, which worsens the disease outcome [82].
It is recommended to prescribe a set of exercises (therapeutic exercises) for the patient to perform independently in order to strengthen muscles and improve disease outcomes [465].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to use biofeedback (a mirror) during rehabilitation for patients with facial nerve neuropathy to improve disease outcomes [466].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: A mirror is used as biofeedback [466]. Biofeedback using myography can also be used [467].
It is recommended to prescribe a set of exercises (therapeutic exercises) aimed at stretching and relaxing the muscles of the contralateral side during rehabilitation in patients with idiopathic or symptomatic facial nerve neuropathy with hypertonicity of the contralateral muscles or the risk of its development (in the acute period of the disease) to improve disease outcomes [99,468].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Muscle tone imbalance in acute facial nerve neuropathy (FNN) causes muscle shortening on the contralateral (conventionally healthy) side, leading to contractures. Excessive activity of the contralateral muscles lengthens/stretches the ipsilateral muscles beyond their physiological length, limiting the potential for muscle strength gains. Short daily sessions aimed at stretching the hyperactive contralateral muscles and strengthening the ipsilateral muscles help restore balance, improve symmetry, and enhance facial muscle function [468]. This exercise set is effective for preventing contralateral muscle hypertonus and for mild impairments. It can be used in patients with moderate to severe muscle hypertonus when botulinum toxin therapy is not feasible [99].
It is recommended to prescribe a set of exercises (exercise therapy / physical therapy) aimed at stretching and relaxing the muscles on both sides (contralateral and ipsilateral) during rehabilitation for patients with muscle hypertonus and/or synkinesis on the affected side in FNN to improve disease outcomes [101].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
Comments: As nerve function recovers and muscle strength increases on the affected side, ipsilateral muscle tone simultaneously increases, and from the 3rd month of the disease, synkinesias appear, leading to structural changes—the development of contractures and post-paralytic hemispasm, respectively. Short daily sessions aimed at stretching (and thereby relaxing) the ipsilateral muscles help improve facial symmetry and muscle function. This exercise set is effective for mild impairments.
It is recommended to monitor the effectiveness of exercise therapy sessions during the patient's home self-rehabilitation for FNN in order to improve disease outcomes [469].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: In FNN, rehabilitation is long-term and continuous, carried out not only in specialized centers but largely consisting of daily home exercises. In a multicenter RCT (Japan, 2020), patients with severe FNN (House-Brackmann V–VI) within up to 2 months from symptom onset were prescribed a physical rehabilitation program (selective exercise therapy using biofeedback, muscle stretching exercises, avoidance of excessive movements, "rough exercises," and electrical stimulation) for home self-rehabilitation, 30 minutes per day with weekly monitoring. Recovery of voluntary movement was observed without exacerbation of synkinesias. The authors suggested using this approach as early as possible in the course of the disease [469]. Every patient must receive training during the initial neurological consultation according to a standardized program (see patient information leaflet) [459].
It is recommended to use medical fixing devices (kinesio tape) early in the rehabilitation of patients with uncomplicated lagophthalmos symptoms in FNN to fix the position of the muscles on the affected side of the face, prevent their overstretching (positional treatment, correction of eyelid position), as well as applying a monocular patch (sticker, adhesive plaster) to the eye socket at night for nighttime eye occlusion to maintain eyeball moisturization and prevent ophthalmological complications [427,428].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: apply a patch or kinesio tape to the upper eyelid during the day for patients with lagophthalmos and upper eyelid malposition; perform "pulling up" of the lower eyelid in the presence of ectropion; perform eyelid occlusion before sleep if the palpebral fissure closure is greater than 4 mm to improve palpebral fissure closure and prevent mechanical damage to the eyeball [102].
It is recommended to prescribe a set of exercises (exercise therapy) aimed at eliminating the muscle imbalance between the orbicularis oculi muscle and the levator palpebrae superioris muscle in patients with uncomplicated lagophthalmos symptoms in FNN to restore eyelid closure [102].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to prescribe a set of exercises (exercise therapy) aimed at targeted action on the depressor anguli oris muscle in patients with isolated marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve palsy in FNN to improve disease outcomes [94].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: The exercise program includes self-massage; stimulation of movement through elements of muscle stretching and contraction; and control of muscle contraction. It has low variability in exercises both in type and number of repetitions, performed two to three times daily. Basic rules for performing the exercises: using biofeedback (mirror), symmetrically, all movements must be point-targeted, dosed, without using maximum force, and without triggering associated movements (synkinesias) of the muscles in the upper third of the face. With a favorable myographic prognosis, smile symmetry is achieved after 4–5 months of exercises [94]
It is recommended to perform reflexology (acupuncture) in diseases of the peripheral nervous system for patients with FNN to improve disease outcomes [470–472].
LoR CGoE 1Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: Reflexotherapy is used only as an additional method of physical rehabilitation in patients with facial nerve neuropathy receiving standard treatment. RCTs have demonstrated the benefits of reflexotherapy in treating patients with symptomatic facial nerve neuropathy (associated with diabetes mellitus, HIV infection) [470–472]. The use of reflexotherapy is more effective in the acute period of the disease [473].
It is not recommended to prescribe a set of exercises (physiotherapy exercises) that includes forced physical exercises for patients with facial nerve neuropathy for the prevention of complications [115,474].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: as they lead to the shortening of muscle fibers, increase the risk of synkinesia development, and hinder favorable recovery.
It is not recommended to perform muscle electrical stimulation in patients with facial nerve neuropathy for the prevention of complications [115,474].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: as it leads to the shortening of muscle fibers, increases the risk of synkinesia development, and hinders favorable recovery.
It is recommended to perform hyperbaric oxygenation in diseases of the peripheral nervous system in patients with facial nerve neuropathy to improve recovery [475,476].
LoR CGoE 1Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 1)
It is recommended to perform laser physiotherapy (low-level and high-level) of the maxillofacial region in patients with facial nerve neuropathy to improve recovery [477–479].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
4.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
Medical rehabilitation is not provided for this category of patients. The patient is provided with information about the disease and its treatment methods (Appendix B4).
4.2.3. Facial myokymia
Medical rehabilitation is not provided for this category of patients. The patient is provided with information about the disease and its treatment methods (Appendix B5).
4.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
Data not available.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
5.1. Trigeminal nerve disorders
Data not available.
5.2. Facial nerve disorders
5.2.1. Facial neuropathy
It is recommended to provide dynamic follow-up by a neurologist for all patients with persistent symptoms of facial nerve neuropathy [115,120,121].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
5.2.2. Hemifacial spasm
It is recommended to provide dynamic follow-up by a neurologist for all patients with persistent symptoms of hemifacial spasm [15,49].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
5.2.3. Facial myokymia
It is recommended to provide dynamic follow-up by a neurologist for all patients with persistent symptoms of facial myokymia [16,58,59].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
5.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
Data not available.
6. Organization of Medical Care
6.1. Trigeminal nerve disorders
6.1.1. Trigeminal neuralgia
Indications for emergency hospitalization to a medical organization (inpatient facility, including day hospital):
first-onset episode of intense pain in the area of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve, accompanied by autonomic symptoms / one of the symptoms (eyelid edema, scleral hyperemia, forehead sweating, pupil size changes, lacrimation, rhinorrhea/nasal congestion) on the side of clinical manifestations (hospitalization to rule out other intracranial pathology — mass and vascular lesions in the cavernous sinus area);
presence of other focal neurological symptoms that arose in close connection with facial pain (hospitalization to rule out other central nervous system pathology — demyelinating brain diseases, intracranial tumors);
uncontrolled pain syndrome (hospitalization to a day or 24-hour hospital to relieve/reduce the severity of acute pain, selection of conservative therapy).
Indications for elective hospitalization to a medical organization (inpatient facility, including day hospital):
performance of minimally invasive puncture interventions to relieve/reduce the severity of pain syndrome;
performance of surgical treatment to relieve/reduce the severity of pain syndrome.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:
establishment of a diagnosis;
reduction/relief of pain syndrome;
stabilization of the condition.
6.1.2. Atypical facial pain
Indications for emergency hospitalization to a medical organization:
Facial pain accompanied by altered consciousness;
Facial pain accompanied by fever and meningeal signs;
Facial pain with progressive focal neurological symptoms;
Facial pain with progressive general cerebral symptoms.
Indications for planned hospitalization in a medical organization:
Progressive nature of the pain.
Pain resistant to adequately prescribed therapy for botulinum therapy and/or interventional treatment.
Comments: botulinum therapy and interventional treatment can also be performed in a day hospital setting.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:
Reduction of pain intensity according to the VAS or NRS.
6.1.3. Other disorders of the trigeminal nerve, unspecified trigeminal nerve disorder
Indications for emergency hospitalization to a medical organization:
suspected trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with Herpes zoster in elderly patients, as well as in patients with immunodeficiency and oncological diseases, for the treatment of the causative viral infection.
Indications for planned hospitalization in a medical organization:
performance of minimally invasive puncture interventions to relieve/reduce the severity of pain syndrome;
performance of surgical treatment to relieve/reduce the severity of pain syndrome.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:
stabilization of the condition after minimally invasive puncture interventions or surgical treatment of trigeminal neuropathic pain;
reduction/relief of pain syndrome.
6.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
Indications for emergency hospitalization to a medical organization:
Facial pain accompanied by altered consciousness.
Facial pain accompanied by fever and meningeal signs.
Facial pain with progressive focal neurological symptoms.
Facial pain with progressive general cerebral symptoms.
Refractory cluster headache for oxygen inhalation to interrupt the cluster period.
Indications for planned hospitalization in a medical organization:
Progressive nature of the pain.
Pain resistant to adequately prescribed therapy for botulinum therapy and/or interventional treatment (which is also possible on an outpatient basis).
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:
Reduction of pain intensity according to the VAS.
6.2. Facial nerve disorders
6.2.1 Facial neuropathy
Indications for emergency hospitalization to a medical organization (inpatient facility, including day hospital):
presentation of a patient with facial paresis/paralysis within the first 72 hours from symptom onset (hospitalization for a single high-dose intravenous administration of #methylprednisolone** when choosing the intravenous route of glucocorticosteroid administration),
presence of other neurological symptoms (weakness or numbness in a limb, dizziness, swallowing disorders, etc.),
clinical deterioration accompanied by altered consciousness, fever, and meningeal signs, facial paresis / facial paralysis against the background of decompensation of comorbid conditions (increased blood pressure, elevated blood sugar levels) or pregnancy,
Indications for elective hospitalization to a medical organization (inpatient facility):
surgical treatment.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization
establishment of a diagnosis;
stabilization of the condition.
6.2.2 Hemifacial spasm
Indications for elective hospitalization to a medical organization (inpatient facility):
surgical treatment.
6.2.3 Facial myokymia
Outpatient treatment.
6.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
Indications for emergency hospitalization to a medical organization (inpatient facility, including day hospital): none.
Indications for elective hospitalization to a medical organization (inpatient facility, including day hospital):
performance of minimally invasive puncture interventions to relieve/reduce the severity of pain syndrome;
performance of surgical treatment to relieve/reduce the severity of pain syndrome.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:
establishment of a diagnosis;
reduction/relief of pain syndrome;
stabilization of the condition.
7. Additional Information
7.1. Trigeminal nerve disorders
Data not available.
7.2. Facial nerve disorders
In patients with facial nerve neuropathy, the frequency of complete functional recovery correlates with the initial symptom severity and ranges from 61% in total facial paralysis to 94% in less severe facial paresis [37]. Clinical examination results do not always correspond to the true severity of nerve damage. ENMG is a mandatory diagnostic method in patients with grade V–VI according to the House-Brackmann scale. ENMG predictors of an unfavorable outcome include an M-wave amplitude asymmetry of more than 90% in 1 or more branches of the facial nerve, and a favorable outcome — less than 90% in all branches [99].
In 68.5% of patients with facial nerve neuropathy who sought medical care within 3 months from symptom onset, hypertonicity of the muscles on the healthy side of the face was detected, which in most cases leads to a shift in the facial midline — a significant factor limiting the recovery of facial nerve function [99]. Early initiation of treatment and medical rehabilitation (including correction of muscle hypertonicity), identification of patients with ENMG predictors of an unfavorable outcome for timely surgical treatment, and a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach increase the proportion of recovery cases [82].
7.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
Data not available.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
8.1. Trigeminal nerve disorders
8.1.1. Trigeminal neuralgia
№ | Quality criteria | Performance evaluation |
|---|---|---|
I. Establishment of a diagnosis | (yes/no) | |
1. | Initial examination (consultation) by a neurologist was performed, including for the diagnosis and treatment of demyelinating, oncological, or other diseases in patients with suspected symptomatic trigeminal neuralgia | Yes/no |
2. | History taking and complaint assessment for pathology of the peripheral and central nervous system and brain were performed | Yes/no |
3. | Sensory and motor sphere examination for peripheral nervous system pathology was performed with targeted assessment of sensory disorders in the innervation projection of trigeminal nerve branches | Yes/no |
4. | Palpation for peripheral nervous system pathology was performed involving application to trigger points with non-painful stimuli and bimanual examination of the muscles of mastication | Yes/no |
5. | Brain magnetic resonance imaging in 3d SPGR mode was performed for all patients with a clinical picture of trigeminal neuralgia | Yes/no |
I. Treatment | ||
1. | Antiepileptic drugs were prescribed in case of persistent pain syndrome | Yes/no |
2. | Antidepressants were prescribed if the pain syndrome lasted for more than 3 months | Yes/no |
4. | Initial examination (consultation) by a neurosurgeon was recommended for patients with pharmacoresistance or intolerance to conservative treatment, or reduced adherence to conservative treatment of trigeminal neuralgia | Yes/no |
5. | Dental consultation was recommended for patients with suspected odontogenic origin of trigeminal neuralgia | Yes/no |
6. | Otolaryngologist consultation was recommended for patients with suspected inflammatory diseases of the paranasal sinuses and inflammatory ear diseases | Yes/no |
7. | A psychiatric consultation is recommended if symptoms of anxiety or depression are detected, and in all cases of questionable TN when orofacial pain is excluded. | Yes/no |
8.1.2. Atypical facial pain
№ | Quality criteria | Performance assessment (yes/no) |
|---|---|---|
1. | An assessment of complaints, history of clinical manifestations, and course of facial pain was performed. | Yes/no |
2. | Neurological, brief somatic, and local status examinations were performed. | Yes/no |
3. | A search for red flags was performed to rule out symptomatic facial pain. | Yes/no |
4. | If one or more warning symptoms are identified, the necessary additional examinations (instrumental, laboratory, specialist consultations) are prescribed and/or the patient is referred to a specialized pain treatment center. | Yes/no |
5. | Differential diagnosis of facial pain forms was carried out in accordance with the ICOT and ICHD-3. | Yes/no |
6. | Clinical diagnosis of major comorbid disorders was performed: depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, sleep disturbance, other pain syndromes. | Yes/no |
7. | Patients with acute facial pain were prescribed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy with a sufficient duration of treatment. | Yes/no |
8. | Patients with chronic facial pain were prescribed therapy with one or more classes of drugs having an evidence base for facial pain therapy: antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs, #botulinum toxin type A**. | Yes/no |
9. | Patients who did not achieve improvement after 3 months of therapy were referred to a specialized pain department or pain treatment center for further management and follow-up. | Yes/no |
8.1.3. Other trigeminal nerve lesions, unspecified trigeminal nerve lesion
№ | Quality criteria | Performance assessment (yes/no) |
|---|---|---|
I. Establishment of a diagnosis | ||
1. | Initial neurologist appointment (examination, consultation) performed | Yes/no |
2. | History taking and complaint assessment for pathology of the peripheral and central nervous system and brain were performed | Yes/no |
3. | Sensory and motor examination in peripheral nervous system pathology was performed with targeted assessment of sensory disturbances in the innervation zones of the trigeminal nerve branches to clarify the neuropathic nature of the pain. | Yes/no |
4. | A visual examination in peripheral nervous system pathology was performed to detect facial skin depigmentation/pigmentation in all patients with suspected trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia. | Yes/no |
5. | Palpation in peripheral nervous system pathology was performed as a bimanual examination of the masticatory and temporal muscles in patients with a questionable diagnosis of trigeminal neuropathic pain to rule out temporomandibular joint dysfunction. | Yes/no |
6. | Palpation of the superficial temporal artery was performed in all patients with newly onset pain in the ophthalmic branch area of the trigeminal nerve aged over 50 years with pain-related episodes of amaurosis fugax, to rule out headache associated with giant cell arteritis. | Yes/no |
7. | A set of tests to assess systemic inflammatory responses, including blood C-reactive protein (CRP) level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), was ordered for all patients with newly onset pain in the ophthalmic branch area of the trigeminal nerve aged over 50 years with pain-related episodes of amaurosis fugax, to rule out headache associated with giant cell arteritis. | Yes/no |
8. | Standard cranial MRI was prescribed for all patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain to clarify potential causes of the clinical manifestations. | Yes/no |
9. | A set of diagnostic examinations of the dentomaxillary system using radiological imaging methods and/or examination of the nasal sinuses (computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses, larynx / X-ray of the paranasal sinuses) was prescribed for patients with suspected trigeminal neuropathic pain associated with another disorder, to rule out odontogenic causes of the disease and inflammatory processes in the paranasal sinuses as the cause of the pain syndrome. | Yes/no |
10. | An initial consultation (testing, counseling) with a medical psychologist is recommended for all patients with chronic trigeminal neuropathic pain to identify factors contributing to the chronification of the pain syndrome. | Yes/no |
11. | An initial consultation (examination, counseling) with a psychiatrist is recommended for patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain if symptoms of anxiety and depression are detected. | Yes/no |
12. | An initial dental consultation (examination, counseling) was prescribed for all patients with suspected odontogenic cause of trigeminal neuropathic pain. | Yes/no |
13. | An initial dermatovenerologist consultation (examination, counseling) and/or an initial infectious disease specialist consultation (examination, counseling) is recommended for all patients with suspected Herpes zoster-associated trigeminal neuropathic pain. | Yes/no |
14. | An initial ophthalmologist consultation (examination, counseling) was prescribed for all patients with suspected Herpes zoster-associated trigeminal neuropathic pain when the disease is localized in the innervation zone of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve. | Yes/no |
15. | An initial rheumatologist consultation (examination, counseling) was prescribed for all patients with trigeminal neuropathic pain in the area of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve, newly occurring after 50 years of age and accompanied by pain-related episodes of amaurosis fugax. | Yes/no |
II. Treatment | ||
1. | Antiepileptic drugs were prescribed in case of persistent pain syndrome | Yes/no |
2. | Antidepressants were prescribed for the chronic course of the pain syndrome. | Yes/no |
3. | Topical anesthetics (patch, ointment) were prescribed for the treatment of chronic trigeminal neuropathic pain. | Yes/no |
4. | An initial neurosurgeon consultation (examination, counseling) is recommended for patients with pharmacoresistance, intolerance to conservative treatment, or reduced adherence to conservative treatment. | Yes/no |
8.1.4. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias
№ | Quality criteria | Performance assessment (yes/no) |
|---|---|---|
I. Establishment of a diagnosis | ||
1. | An inquiry about clinical manifestations, disease course, presence of autonomic symptoms, and trigger factors was performed. | Yes/no |
2. | A neurological status examination was performed. | Yes/no |
3. | A search for warning signs was performed to rule out a secondary cause of headache. | Yes/no |
4. | Neuroimaging (brain MRI or brain CT if MRI is contraindicated) was performed in a patient with newly diagnosed trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia. | Yes/no |
5. | Assessment of compliance with ICHD-3 disease criteria was performed. | Yes/no |
II. Treatment | ||
Recommendations for acute attack treatment were provided. | Yes/no | |
Preventive treatment was prescribed when necessary. | Yes/no | |
Headache diary keeping was recommended. | Yes/no | |
In cases of treatment-refractory trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia, consultation at a pain treatment center or specialized department is recommended. | Yes/no | |
8.2. Facial nerve disorders
8.2.1 Facial neuropathy
№ | Quality criteria | Performance assessment (yes/no) |
|---|---|---|
I. Establishment of a diagnosis | ||
1. | A neurologist consultation (examination, counseling) was performed. | Yes/no |
2. | An active medical history and complaint review was conducted, including epidemiological history. | Yes/no |
3. | Visual inspection of muscles and muscle palpation were performed; static and dynamic strength of facial muscles was determined, including recording of involuntary movements (synkinesias). | Yes/no |
4. | Visual examination of the eyes was performed with assessment of the presence and severity of the lagophthalmos symptom. | Yes/no |
5. | An otolaryngologist consultation (examination, counseling) was performed. | Yes/no |
6. | An ophthalmologist consultation (examination, counseling) was performed. | Yes/no |
7. | An infectious disease specialist consultation (examination, counseling) was performed when an infectious etiology of the disease was suspected. | Yes/no |
8. | A physical therapy specialist consultation (examination, counseling) was performed for patients with severe impairment or the presence of factors worsening the disease outcome. | Yes/no |
9. | A neurosurgeon consultation (examination, counseling) was performed for patients with Bell's palsy and severe impairment (M-wave amplitude asymmetry greater than 90% according to stimulation electroneuromyography). | Yes/no |
10. | A maxillofacial surgeon / neurosurgeon consultation (examination, counseling) was performed 3 months after symptom onset in cases of severe impairment. | Yes/no |
Laboratory tests | ||
11. | A complete blood count (CBC) with differential was performed. | Yes/no |
12. | A general biochemical blood test, including fasting blood glucose level determination, was performed. | Yes/no |
13. | Glycated hemoglobin blood level testing was performed in patients with diabetes mellitus. | Yes/no |
14. | Serological diagnostics were performed for patients with suspected infectious etiology of the disease, specifically: determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to Human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 in the blood; determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to Human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 in the blood; determination of antibodies to Herpes simplex virus in the blood; determination of antibodies to Varicella-Zoster virus in the blood; determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to Cytomegalovirus in the blood; determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in the blood; determination of antibodies to Human herpesvirus 6 in the blood. | Yes/no |
15. | Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level testing was performed. | Yes/no |
Instrumental tests | ||
16. | Emergency brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was performed for patients with an atypical clinical presentation. | Yes/no |
17. | Contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed for patients with persistent symptoms lasting more than 3 weeks. | Yes/no |
18. | Computed tomography of the temporal bone was performed when ENT pathology or trauma was suspected. | Yes/no |
19. | Ultrasound of the salivary glands (parotid gland) or contrast-enhanced soft tissue magnetic resonance imaging (salivary glands) was performed for patients with undetermined disease etiology when symptoms persist for more than 3 weeks. | Yes/no |
20. | Stimulation electroneuromyography of one nerve was performed in patients with severe facial nerve neuropathy (grades V–VI on the House-Brackmann scale) no earlier than 8 days after symptom onset | Yes/no |
21. | Needle electroneuromyography (one nerve) with assessment of motor unit potentials (MUPs) was performed in patients with an M-wave amplitude asymmetry of more than 90% according to stimulation electroneuromyography data | Yes/no |
22. | Needle electroneuromyography (one nerve) with assessment of MUPs in a paralyzed muscle of the affected side within the area of impaired innervation was performed in patients with isolated involvement of a single branch | Yes/no |
23. | Follow-up needle electroneuromyography (one nerve) at 6 months was performed in patients with persistent severe facial nerve neuropathy (grades V–VI on the House-Brackmann scale) | Yes/no |
24. | Ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissues (one anatomical region) of the face was performed in patients with an M-wave amplitude asymmetry of more than 90% according to stimulation electroneuromyography data at more than 3 months after symptom onset | Yes/no |
II. Treatment | ||
1. | Glucocorticosteroids were prescribed (optimally within the first 72 hours of symptom onset) to patients with Bell's palsy regardless of disease severity | Yes/no |
2. | Systemic antiviral drugs were prescribed when a viral etiology of the disease was suspected | Yes/no |
3. | Glucocorticosteroids and systemic antiviral agents were prescribed to patients with Ramsay Hunt syndrome | Yes/no |
4. | Systemic antibacterial drugs were prescribed when a bacterial etiology of the disease was suspected | Yes/no |
5. | Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs were prescribed in the presence of pain syndrome | Yes/no |
6. | Botulinum toxin was prescribed to patients with moderate and severe symptoms: hypertonus of the muscles on the healthy side or muscle hypertonus / synkinesias on the affected side | Yes/no |
7. | Other ophthalmic drugs, artificial tears, and other indifferent preparations in various forms (eye drops, gels) were prescribed | Yes/no |
8. | Fixation of the position of the eye muscles during the day was performed, and application of a monocular patch (dressing, adhesive tape) to the eye socket at night was prescribed for nocturnal eye occlusion | Yes/no |
9. | Fixation of the position of the muscles on the affected side of the face using medical fixing devices (kinesio tape) was performed in patients with severe involvement (grades V–VI on the House-Brackmann scale) | Yes/no |
10. | Physiotherapy exercise was prescribed: a set of passive exercises for patients with severe involvement (grades V–VI on the House-Brackmann scale) or a set of active exercises with dosed muscle contraction for moderate or mild involvement (grade IV and below on the House-Brackmann scale) | Yes/no |
11. | Physiotherapy exercise was prescribed: a set of muscle stretching and relaxation exercises for patients with mild symptoms: hypertonus of the muscles on the healthy side or muscle hypertonus / synkinesias on the affected side | Yes/no |
12. | Physiotherapy exercise was prescribed: a set of exercises for the eye muscles for patients with uncomplicated lagophthalmos | Yes/no |
13. | Physiotherapy exercise was prescribed: a set of exercises targeted at the depressor anguli oris / depressor labii inferioris muscle for patients with isolated involvement of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve | Yes/no |
8.2.2 Hemifacial spasm
№ | Quality criteria | Performance assessment (yes/no) |
|---|---|---|
I. Establishment of a diagnosis | ||
1. | Clinical studies | Yes/no |
2. | A neurologist consultation (examination, counseling) was performed. | Yes/no |
3. | Visual examination of muscles and muscle palpation were performed, and the static and dynamic strength of facial muscles was determined, including recording of involuntary movements | Yes/no |
4. | A consultation (examination) by a neurosurgeon was performed for patients with hemifacial spasm when neurovascular conflict or a space-occupying lesion was detected on magnetic resonance imaging | Yes/no |
5. | Laboratory tests | Yes/no |
6. | A complete blood count (CBC) with differential was performed. | Yes/no |
7. | A general biochemical blood test, including fasting blood glucose level determination, was performed. | Yes/no |
8. | Instrumental tests | Yes/no |
9. | An extended-protocol brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed to detect neurovascular conflict | Yes/no |
10. | Contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed in patients with clinical presentation of hemifacial spasm in the absence of neurovascular conflict | Yes/no |
11. | Ultrasound of the salivary glands (parotid gland) or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissues (salivary glands) was performed in patients with undetermined disease etiology | Yes/no |
II. Treatment | ||
1. | Botulinum toxin was prescribed for diseases of the peripheral nervous system | Yes/no |
8.2.3 Facial myokymia
№ | Quality criteria | Performance assessment (yes/no) |
|---|---|---|
I. Establishment of a diagnosis | ||
1. | Clinical studies | Yes/no |
2. | A neurologist consultation (examination, counseling) was performed. | Yes/no |
3. | Visual examination of muscles and muscle palpation were performed, and the static and dynamic strength of facial muscles was determined, including recording of involuntary movements | Yes/no |
4. | Laboratory tests | Yes/no |
5. | A complete blood count (extended clinical blood test) was performed in cases where "red flags" were identified | Yes/no |
6. | A general biochemical blood test, including fasting blood glucose testing, was performed in cases where "red flags" were identified | Yes/no |
7. | Instrumental tests | Yes/no |
8. | Contrast-enhanced brain magnetic resonance imaging was performed in patients when "red flags" were identified | Yes/no |
II. Treatment | ||
1. | Physical and emotional rest, reduced caffeine intake, and elimination of triggering factors were prescribed | Yes/no |
8.3. Disorders of other cranial nerves
№ | Quality criteria | Performance assessment (yes/no) |
|---|---|---|
I. Establishment of a diagnosis | Yes/no | |
1. | Initial neurologist appointment (examination, consultation) performed | Yes/no |
2. | History taking and complaint assessment for pathology of the peripheral and central nervous system and brain were performed | Yes/no |
3. | Sensory and motor examination for pathology of the peripheral nervous system was performed with targeted assessment of cranial nerve function | Yes/no |
4. | Standard-protocol brain MRI was prescribed for all patients with cranial neuropathies except post-COVID olfactory neuropathy | Yes/no |
II. Treatment | Yes/no | |
1. | Antiepileptic drugs were prescribed in case of persistent pain syndrome | Yes/no |
2. | Antidepressants were prescribed for the chronic course of the pain syndrome. | Yes/no |
3. | An initial consultation (examination) by a neurosurgeon is recommended for patients with pharmacoresistance or intolerance to conservative treatment, poor adherence to conservative treatment, or a detected tumor process | Yes/no |
4. | An initial consultation (examination) by an oncologist is recommended for patients with a detected tumor process and suspected malignant neoplasm | Yes/no |
5. | An initial consultation (examination) by a rheumatologist is recommended for patients with a detected autoimmune process or suspected autoimmune process | Yes/no |
References
Show references
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition // Cephalalgia. 2018. Vol. 38, № 1. P. 1–211.
Ashina S. et al. Trigeminal neuralgia // Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2024. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 39.
Agostoni E., Frigerio R., Santoro P. Atypical facial pain: clinical considerations and differential diagnosis // Neurol. Sci. 2005. Vol. 26, № S2. P. s71–s74.
Forssell H. et al. Differences and similarities between atypical facial pain and trigeminal neuropathic pain // Neurology. 2007. Vol. 69, № 14. P. 1451–1459.
International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st edition (ICOP) // Cephalalgia. 2020. Vol. 40, № 2. P. 129–221.
Jääskeläinen S.K. Pathophysiology of primary burning mouth syndrome // Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012. Vol. 123, № 1. P. 71–77.
Scala A. et al. U <scp>pdate on</scp> B <scp>urning</scp> M <scp>outh</scp> S <scp>yndrome:</scp> O <scp>verview and</scp> P <scp>atient</scp> M <scp>anagement</scp> // Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2003. Vol. 14, № 4. P. 275–291.
Svensson P. et al. The many faces of persistent orofacial muscle pain. // J. oral facial pain headache. 2015. Vol. 29, № 2. P. 207–208.
IASP. IASP taxonomy. https://www.iasp-pain.org/terminology?navItemNumber=576. 2024 [Electronic resource].
Finnerup N.B., Kuner R., Jensen T.S. Neuropathic Pain: From Mechanisms to Treatment // Physiol. Rev. 2021. Vol. 101, № 1. P. 259–301.
Edited by E.I. Gusev, A.N. Konovalov, V.I. Skvortsova. Neurology. National Guidelines. GEOTAR-Media, Moscow, 2018.
Volk G.F. et al. Initial severity of motor and non-motor disabilities in patients with facial palsy: an assessment using patient-reported outcome measures // Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2017. Vol. 274, № 1. P. 45–52.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Modern approaches to the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with facial neuropathy // Bull. Restor. Med. 2020. Vol. 96, № 2. P. 59–67.
Parfyonov V.A., Yakhno N.N., Zinovyeva O.E. Nervous Diseases (in 2 volumes). Moscow: Medical Information Agency, 2021.
Zalyalova Z.A. Hemifacial spasm // Zhurnal Nevrol. i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2020. Vol. 120, № 8. P. 140.
Banik R., Miller N.R. Chronic Myokymia Limited to the Eyelid Is a Benign Condition // J. Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2004. Vol. 24, № 4. P. 290–292.
Jafer Chardoub A.A. P.B.C. Eyelid Myokymia // StatPearls Publ. 2022.
Keane J.R. Multiple Cranial Nerve Palsies // Arch. Neurol. 2005. Vol. 62, № 11. P. 1714.
Maarbjerg S. et al. Significance of neurovascular contact in classical trigeminal neuralgia // Brain. 2015. Vol. 138, № 2. P. 311–319.
Azimova Yu.E., Sergeyev A.V., Tabeeva G.R. Persistent idiopathic facial pain // Russian Journal of Pain. 2011. Vol. 3. P. 3–7.
Didier H. et al. Persistent idiopathic facial pain: multidisciplinary approach and assumption of comorbidity // Neurol. Sci. 2010. Vol. 31, № S1. P. 189–195.
Hagelberg N. et al. Altered dopamine D2 receptor binding in atypical facial pain // Pain. 2003. Vol. 106, № 1. P. 43–48.
Mense S. Muscle Pain – Mechanisms and Clinical Significance: In Reply // Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2008.
Schmidt‐Wilcke T., Hierlmeier S., Leinisch E. Altered Regional Brain Morphology in Patients With Chronic Facial Pain // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2010. Vol. 50, № 8. P. 1278–1285.
Derbyshire S.W. et al. Cerebral responses to pain in patients with atypical facial pain measured by positron emission tomography. // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1994. Vol. 57, № 10. P. 1166–1172.
Parkhomenko E.V., Nartov S.E., Karpov D.Yu. Persistent idiopathic facial pain: a complex path to a complex diagnosis // Russian Medical Journal. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 1738–1744.
Bergdahl M., Bergdahl J. Burning mouth syndrome: prevalence and associated factors // J. Oral Pathol. Med. 1999. Vol. 28, № 8. P. 350–354.
Pain. Practical Guidelines / ed. by Academician of the RAS N.N. Yakhno. Moscow: MEDпресс-информ, 2022. 416 p.
Colvin L.A., Fallon M. Essentials of Pain Medicine: Textbook / transl. from English ed. by A.B. Danilov. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2015. 128 p.
Laing K.J. et al. Immunobiology of Varicella-Zoster Virus Infection // J. Infect. Dis. 2018. Vol. 218, № suppl_2. P. S68–S74.
Como C.N. et al. Varicella Zoster Virus Induces Differential Cell-Type Specific Responses in Human Corneal Epithelial Cells and Keratocytes // Investig. Opthalmology Vis. Sci. 2019. Vol. 60, № 2. P. 704.
Lin D. et al. Serum interleukin-6 levels are increased in post-herpetic neuralgia: a single-center retrospective study // An. Bras. Dermatol. 2023. Vol. 98, № 2. P. 202–207.
Marchenko N. V. et al. The potential of electromyography, diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation, and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the combinatory assessment of facial nerve disorders: a literature review and clinical case series // Alm. Clin. Med. 2023. Vol. 51, № 3. P. 180–191.
Zhang W. et al. The etiology of Bell’s palsy: a review // J. Neurol. 2020. Vol. 267, № 7. P. 1896–1905.
Chang B. et al. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing of viruses, bacteria, and fungi in the epineurium of the facial nerve with Bell’s palsy patients // J. Neurovirol. 2020. Vol. 26, № 5. P. 727–733.
Holland N.J., Bernstein J.M. Bell’s palsy. // BMJ Clin. Evid. 2014. Vol. 2014.
Peitersen E. Bell’s palsy: the spontaneous course of 2,500 peripheral facial nerve palsies of different etiologies. // Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 2002. № 549. P. 4–30.
Finkensieper M., Volk G., Guntinas-Lichius O. Erkrankungen des Nervus facialis // Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie. 2012. Vol. 91, № 02. P. 121–142.
Franzke P. et al. Weather, Weather Changes and the Risk of Bell’s Palsy: A Multicenter Case-Crossover Study // Neuroepidemiology. 2018. Vol. 51, № 3–4. P. 207–215.
Hohman M.H., Hadlock T.A. Etiology, diagnosis, and management of facial palsy: 2000 patients at a facial nerve center // Laryngoscope. 2014. Vol. 124, № 7.
Yeo S.-W. et al. Analysis of prognostic factors in Bell’s palsy and Ramsay Hunt syndrome // Auris Nasus Larynx. 2007. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 159–164.
Chweya C.M. et al. For Whom the Bell’s Toll: Recurrent Facial Nerve Paralysis, A Retrospective Study and Systematic Review of the Literature // Otol. Neurotol. 2019. Vol. 40, № 4. P. 517–528.
Zimmermann J. et al. Differential diagnosis of peripheral facial nerve palsy: a retrospective clinical, MRI and CSF-based study // J. Neurol. 2019. Vol. 266, № 10. P. 2488–2494.
Tolisano A.M. et al. Determining Etiology of Facial Nerve Paralysis With MRI: Challenges in Malignancy Detection // Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2019. Vol. 128, № 9. P. 862–868.
Kim M.H., Park S.Y. Population-based study and a scoping review for the epidemiology and seasonality in and effect of weather on Bell’s palsy // Sci. Rep. 2021. Vol. 11, № 1. P. 16941.
Lorch M., Teach S.J. Facial Nerve Palsy // Pediatr. Emerg. Care. 2010. Vol. 26, № 10. P. 763–769.
Gretskikh K.V. et al. Early and late facial neuropathy after radiosurgery of vestibulocochlear schwannomas // Vestn. Nevrol. Psihiatr. i Nejrohir. (Bulletin Neurol. Psychiatry Neurosurgery). 2023. № 7. P. 525–535.
Nau R., Christen H.-J., Eiffert H. Lyme Disease // Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2009.
Shimanskiy V.N., Tanyashin S. V., Poshataev V.K. Surgical correction of cranial nerve vascular compression syndromes // Vopr. neirokhirurgii Im. N.N. Burdenko. 2017. Vol. 81, № 2. P. 96.
Typical or Atypical Hemifacial Spasm // J. Neurosurg. 1998. Vol. 89, № 2.
Berg T., Jonsson L. Corticosteroids and antivirals in Bell palsy // Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2013. Vol. 9, № 3. P. 128–129.
Adour K.K. et al. The True Nature of Bell’s Palsy: Analysis af 1,000 Consecutive Patients // Laryngoscope. 1978. Vol. 88, № 5. P. 787–801.
Chekhonatskaya K.I. et al. Synkinesis in patients with neuropathy of the facial nerve // Russ. Neurol. J. 2022. Vol. 27, № 5. P. 14–22.
Shokri T. et al. Facial synkinesis: A distressing sequela of facial palsy // Ear, Nose Throat J. 2024. Vol. 103, № 6. P. NP382–NP391.
Hammerschlag P.E. Facial reanimation with jump interpositional graft hypoglossal facial anastomosis and hypoglossal facial anastomosis: Evolution in management of facial paralysis // Laryngoscope. 1999. Vol. 109, № S90. P. 1–23.
Mechrgui M., Kanani S. The Ophthalmic Side Effects of Topiramate: A Review // Cureus. 2022.
Rissardo J.P., Medeiros Araujo de Matos U., Fornari Caprara A.L. Gabapentin-Associated Movement Disorders: A Literature Review // Medicines. 2023. Vol. 10, № 9. P. 52.
Ghosh R. et al. Movement Disorders in Multiple Sclerosis: An Update // Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements. 2022. Vol. 12, № 1. P. 14.
Ito E., Sugita R., Saito R. Eyelid myokymia caused by a trigeminal schwannoma as determined by the trigeminal‐evoked blink reflex // Clin. Case Reports. 2023. Vol. 11, № 3.
De Toledo I.P. et al. Prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia // J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2016. Vol. 147, № 7. P. 570-576.e2.
Feinmann C., Harris M., Cawley R. Psychogenic facial pain: presentation and treatment. // BMJ. 1984. Vol. 288, № 6415. P. 436–438.
Wirz S. et al. Management of Chronic Orofacial Pain: A Survey of General Dentists in German University Hospitals // Pain Med. 2010. Vol. 11, № 3. P. 416–424.
Labanca M. et al. Orofacial Pain and Dentistry Management: Guidelines for a More Comprehensive Evidence-Based Approach // Diagnostics. 2023. Vol. 13, № 17. P. 2854.
Klompas M. et al. Herpes Zoster and Postherpetic Neuralgia Surveillance Using Structured Electronic Data // Mayo Clin. Proc. 2011. Vol. 86, № 12. P. 1146–1153.
Fashner J., Bell A.L. Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia: prevention and management. // Am. Fam. Physician. 2011. Vol. 83, № 12. P. 1432–1437.
Shamalov N.A. et al. Epidemiology of facial nerve diseases in a megalopolis according to the city's unified medical system data // Medicine and Healthcare Organization. 2024. Vol. 9, № 2. P. 60–69.
Carmel Neiderman N.N. et al. Bell’s palsy and pregnancy: Incidence, comorbidities and complications. A meta‐analysis and systematic review of the literature // Clin. Otolaryngol. 2023. Vol. 48, № 4. P. 576–586.
Koryagina A.D., Murashko A. V., Popova E. V. Peripheral neuropathy occurring during pregnancy (literature review) // V.F.Snegirev Arch. Obstet. Gynecol. 2023. Vol. 10, № 3. P. 187–193.
Dong S.H. et al. Recurrent Bell’s palsy // Clin. Otolaryngol. 2019. Vol. 44, № 3. P. 305–312.
Stornaiuolo A. et al. Multiple cranial neuropathy due to varicella zoster virus reactivation without vesicular rash: a challenging diagnosis // Neurol. Sci. 2023. Vol. 44, № 10. P. 3687–3689.
Teggi R. et al. Cochleo-Vestibular Disorders in Herpes Zoster Oticus: A Literature Review and a Case of Bilateral Vestibular Hypofunction in Unilateral HZO // J. Clin. Med. 2023. Vol. 12, № 19. P. 6206.
Evtushenko S.K., Grishtakova E.G. Early diagnosis and immunocorrective therapy of recurrent facial neuritis as a manifestation of Melkersson-Rosenthal syndrome in adults and children // S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neuropathology and Psychiatry. 1990. Vol. 12. P. 31–35.
SIMONE M. et al. Intraparotid facial nerve schwannoma: two case reports and a review of the literature // Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2018. Vol. 38, № 1. P. 73–77.
Shimizu K. et al. Intraparotid facial nerve schwannoma: a report of five cases and an analysis of MR imaging results. // AJNR. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2005. Vol. 26, № 6. P. 1328–1330.
Auger R.G., Whisnant J.P. Hemifacial Spasm in Rochester and Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1960 to 1984 // Arch. Neurol. 1990. Vol. 47, № 11. P. 1233–1234.
Çelik M., Forta H., Vural Ç. The Development of Synkinesis after Facial Nerve Paralysis // Eur. Neurol. 2000. Vol. 43, № 3. P. 147–151.
Salles A.G. et al. Epidemiologic Overview of Synkinesis in 353 Patients with Longstanding Facial Paralysis under Treatment with Botulinum Toxin for 11 Years // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2015. Vol. 136, № 6. P. 1289–1298.
Albahkaly S. et al. Reappraisal of glossopharyngeal neuralgia // Interdiscip. Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 11. P. 34–36.
Han A. et al. Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: Epidemiology, Risk factors, Pathophysiology, Differential diagnosis, and Treatment Options // Heal. Psychol. Res. 2022. Vol. 10, № 5.
Shah R.J., Padalia D. Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia. 2024.
Burchiel K.J. A New Classification for Facial Pain // Neurosurgery. 2003. Vol. 53, № 5. P. 1164–1167.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Comprehensive approach to the diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with facial nerve neuropathy at different periods of the disease // Russ. Neurol. J. 2022. Vol. 27, № 1. P. 69–79.
Maarbjerg S. et al. Trigeminal Neuralgia – A Prospective Systematic Study of Clinical Characteristics in 158 Patients // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2014. Vol. 54, № 10. P. 1574–1582.
Nurmikko T.J. Altered Cutaneous Sensation in Trigeminal Neuralgia // Arch. Neurol. 1991. Vol. 48, № 5. P. 523–527.
Mock D., Frydman W., Gordon A.S. Atypical facial pain: A retrospective study // Oral Surgery, Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 1985. Vol. 59, № 5. P. 472–474.
Pfaffenrath V. et al. Atypical facial pain–application of the IHS criteria in a clinical sample // Cephalalgia. 1993. Vol. 13, № 12_suppl. P. 84–88.
Lang E. et al. Persistent idiopathic facial pain exists independent of somatosensory input from the painful region: findings from quantitative sensory functions and somatotopy of the primary somatosensory cortex // Pain. 2005. Vol. 118, № 1. P. 80–91.
Peck C.C. et al. Expanding the taxonomy of the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders // J. Oral Rehabil. 2014. Vol. 41, № 1. P. 2–23.
Truini A. et al. Pathophysiology of pain in postherpetic neuralgia: A clinical and neurophysiological study // Pain. 2008. Vol. 140, № 3. P. 405–410.
Alvarez F.K. et al. Evaluation of the sensation in patients with trigeminal post‐herpetic neuralgia // J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2007. Vol. 36, № 6. P. 347–350.
Chae S.A. et al. Association Between Clinical Symptoms, Electrodiagnostic Findings, Clinical Outcome, and Prodromal Symptoms in Patients With Bell’s Palsy // Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 2023. Vol. 132, № 1. P. 27–34.
Lee S.-Y., Seong J., Kim Y.H. Clinical Implication of Facial Nerve Decompression in Complete Bell’s Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Clin. Exp. Otorhinolaryngol. 2019. Vol. 12, № 4. P. 348–359.
Rimkevichus A.A.R. et al. First experience with botulinum toxin type A in central prosoparesis // Pharmateca. 2022. Vol. 3_2022. P. 83–90.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. The neuropathy of marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve // Zhurnal Nevrol. i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2022. Vol. 122, № 11. P. 143.
RALLI G., MAGLIULO G., GAGLIARDI M. Bell’s palsy and stapedial reflex // Clin. Otolaryngol. 1986. Vol. 11, № 4. P. 261–265.
Rosen G., Sellars S.L. The stapedius reflex in idiopathic facial palsy // J. Laryngol. Otol. 1980. Vol. 94, № 9. P. 1017–1020.
Saksonova E.V., Orlova O.R. Pain syndrome in Bell's palsy // Treatment of Nervous System Diseases. 2014. Vol. 3, № 15. P. 36–40.
Orlova O.R. et al. The use of botulinum toxin type a in the acute phase of facial nerve injury after neurosurgical surgery // Vopr. neirokhirurgii Im. N.N. Burdenko. 2014. Vol. 78, № 6. P. 50.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Rehabilitation of patients with facial nerve neuropathy in cases of increased muscle tone on the healthy side of the face // Zhurnal Nevrol. i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2024. Vol. 124, № 2. P. 116.
Volk G.F. et al. Quantitative ultrasonography of facial muscles in patients with chronic facial palsy // Muscle Nerve. 2014. Vol. 50, № 3. P. 358–365.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Rehabilitation of patients with complications of facial nerve neuropathy // Zhurnal Nevrol. i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2023. Vol. 123, № 11. P. 90.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of patients with paralytic lagophthalmos // Nervous Diseases. 2023. Vol. 3. P. 36–45.
Gusev E.I. Neurology and Neurosurgery. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Neurology: Textbook / E.I. Gusev, A.N. Konovalov, V.I. Skvortsova; ed. by A.N. Konovalov, A.V. Kozlov. - 4th ed., suppl. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2015. 640 p.
Remick R.A., Blasberg B. Psychiatric aspects of atypical facial pain. // J. Can. Dent. Assoc. 1985. Vol. 51, № 12. P. 913–916.
Essentials of Pain Medicine. Elsevier, 2011.
Heckmann J.G. et al. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Facial Paresis (Bell’s Palsy) // Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2019.
Singh A., Deshmukh P. Bell’s Palsy: A Review // Cureus. 2022.
Weiss A.L., Ehrhardt K.P., Tolba R. Atypical Facial Pain: a Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Review // Curr. Pain Headache Rep. 2017. Vol. 21, № 2. P. 8.
Ponte C. et al. 2022 American College of Rheumatology/EULAR Classification Criteria for Giant Cell Arteritis // Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022. Vol. 74, № 12. P. 1881–1889.
Yanagihara N. Incidence of Bell’s Palsy // Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1988. Vol. 97, № 6_suppl3. P. 3–4.
DE DIEGO J.I. et al. Seasonal Patterns of Idiopathic Facial Paralysis: A 16‐Year Study // Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 1999. Vol. 120, № 2. P. 269–271.
Petrikov S.S. et al. Routing, diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with facial nerve neuropathy in the metropolis // Russ. Neurol. J. 2023. Vol. 28, № 5. P. 40–51.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Diagnosis of patients with facial neuropathy by practicing neurologists: online survey // Russ. Neurol. J. 2023. Vol. 28, № 2. P. 15–24.
Cabrol C. et al. Sunnybrook Facial Grading System: Intra-rater and Inter-rater Variabilities // Otol. Neurotol. 2021. Vol. 42, № 7. P. 1089–1094.
Fieux M. et al. French Society of ENT (SFORL) guidelines. Management of acute Bell’s palsy // Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Dis. 2020. Vol. 137, № 6. P. 483–488.
House J.W., Brackmann D.E. Facial Nerve Grading System // Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 1985. Vol. 93, № 2. P. 146–147.
Hu W.-L., Ross B., Nedzelski J. Reliability of the Sunnybrook Facial Grading System by Novice Users // J. Otolaryngol. 2001. Vol. 30, № 04. P. 208.
MAT LAZIM N. et al. Comparison of 3 Grading Systems (House-Brackmann, Sunnybrook, Sydney) for the Assessment of Facial Nerve Paralysis and Prediction of Neural Recovery // Medeni. Med. J. 2023. Vol. 38, № 2. P. 111–119.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Modern approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of lagophthalmos in facial neuropathy // Nervous Diseases. 2023. Vol. 1. P. 81–88.
Baugh R.F. et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Bell’s Palsy // Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 2013. Vol. 149, № S3.
de Almeida J.R. et al. Management of Bell palsy: clinical practice guideline // Can. Med. Assoc. J. 2014. Vol. 186, № 12. P. 917–922.
Castiglione M. et al. Immediate disappearance of hemifacial spasm after partial removal of ponto-medullary junction anaplastic astrocytoma: case report // Neurosurg. Rev. 2015. Vol. 38, № 2. P. 385–390.
Lee S.-U. et al. Lower brainstem melanocytoma masquerading as vestibular paroxysmia // J. Neurol. 2018. Vol. 265, № 5. P. 1222–1225.
Martin E.J. et al. Hemifacial Spasm Secondary to Parotid Pleomorphic Adenoma With Stylomastoid Foramen Extension // Otol. Neurotol. 2017. Vol. 38, № 1. P. 129–132.
Basker R.M., Sturdee D.W., Davenport J.C. Patients with burning mouths. A clinical investigation of causative factors, including the climacteric and diabetes // Br. Dent. J. 1978. Vol. 145, № 1. P. 9–16.
CARRINGTON J., GETTER L., BROWN R.S. Diabetic neuropathy masquerading as glossodynia // J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 2001. Vol. 132, № 11. P. 1549–1551.
Faccini J.M. Oral manifestations of vitamin B12 deficiency // Br. J. Oral Surg. 1968. Vol. 6, № 2. P. 137–140.
Kanaparthi Alekhya, Srikar Muppirala. Oral Manifestations of Vitamin B12 (Cobalamin) Deficiency: A Review // Int. Healthc. Res. J. 2019. Vol. 3, № 1. P. 9–15.
Fan H.-R. et al. Correction: Early Diagnosis of Herpes Zoster Neuralgia: A Narrative Review // Pain Ther. 2024. Vol. 13, № 5. P. 1323–1323.
Kilgore P.E. et al. Varicella in Americans from NHANES III: Implications for control through routine immunization // J. Med. Virol. 2003. Vol. 70, № S1. P. S111–S118.
Oya R. et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as Prognostic Hematologic Markers of Bell’s Palsy: A Meta-analysis // Otol. Neurotol. 2019. Vol. 40, № 5. P. 681–687.
Runesson B., Jonsson A., Lindeman E. [Diethylene glycol poisoning - the first known Swedish case]. // Lakartidningen. 2021. Vol. 118.
Simsek M., Bilici M., Tekin S. Creatinine kinase elevation and peripheral neuropathy during nivolumab treatment of a patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma // Indian J. Cancer. 2018. Vol. 55, № 4. P. 413.
Shekar V. et al. Facial nerve paralysis: A case report of rare complication in uncontrolled diabetic patient with mucormycosis // J. Nat. Sci. Biol. Med. 2015. Vol. 6, № 1. P. 226.
Liu M. et al. Bulbar Paralysis and Facial Paralysis due to Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma // Medicine (Baltimore). 2016. Vol. 95, № 4. P. e2632.
Ramirez-Sanchez C. et al. A unique case of Miller Fisher-Guillain-Barré overlap syndrome in a liver transplant recipient // J. Neurovirol. 2021. Vol. 27, № 5. P. 797–801.
Hwang Y.S. et al. Two cases of Ramsay-Hunt syndrome following varicella zoster viral meningitis in young immunocompetent men: case reports // BMC Neurol. 2023. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 43.
Hepprich M. et al. Hypothyroidism manifesting as multiple cranial neuropathies: a case report // J. Med. Case Rep. 2019. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 180.
Saito O. et al. Diagnosis and Treatment for Bell’s Palsy Associated with Diabetes Mellitus // Acta Otolaryngol. 1994. Vol. 114, № sup511. P. 153–155.
Sathirapanya P. et al. Peripheral facial paralysis associated with HIV infection: A case series and literature review // Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 172. P. 124–129.
Cooper L. et al. Lyme disease and Bell’s palsy: an epidemiological study of diagnosis and risk in England // Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2017. Vol. 67, № 658. P. e329–e335.
Gordillo-Pérez G. et al. Serological Evidence of Borrelia Burgdorferi Infection in Mexican Patients with Facial Palsy. // Rev. Invest. Clin. 2017. Vol. 69, № 6. P. 344–348.
Wallménius K., Påhlson C., Nilsson K. Retrospective serological study of Rickettsia spp. and Borrelia spp. antibodies in patients with peripheral facial nerve palsy // Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 2021. Vol. 11, № 1.
Stahl A. et al. Association Between Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone Level and Bell’s Palsy // Otol. Neurotol. 2023. Vol. 44, № 7. P. 730–736.
MAJIGSUREN M. et al. Comparison of Brain Tumor Contrast-enhancement on T<sub>1</sub>-CUBE and 3D-SPGR Images // Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 2016. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 34–40.
Liang C. et al. Different MRI-based methods for the diagnosis of neurovascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia or hemifacial spasm: A network meta-analysis // J. Clin. Neurosci. 2023. Vol. 108. P. 19–24.
Koch M. et al. Ultrasound in Inflammatory and Obstructive Salivary Gland Diseases: Own Experiences and a Review of the Literature // J. Clin. Med. 2021. Vol. 10, № 16. P. 3547.
Öztunç H. et al. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of styloid process: a retrospective study of 208 patients with orofacial pain // Head Face Med. 2014. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 5.
Choi E. et al. Artificial intelligence in detecting temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis on orthopantomogram // Sci. Rep. 2021. Vol. 11, № 1. P. 10246.
Schmitter M. et al. Validity of temporomandibular disorder examination procedures for assessment of temporomandibular joint status // Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 2008. Vol. 133, № 6. P. 796–803.
Cornelissen P. et al. 3. Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain // Pain Pract. 2009. Vol. 9, № 6. P. 443–448.
Nóbrega J.C.M. et al. Diferential diagnosis in atypical facial pain: a clinical study // Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 2007. Vol. 65, № 2A. P. 256–261.
MANFREDINI D. et al. Surface electromyography of jaw muscles and kinesiographic recordings: diagnostic accuracy for myofascial pain // J. Oral Rehabil. 2011. Vol. 38, № 11. P. 791–799.
Paterson A.J. et al. Burning mouth syndrome: the relationship between the HAD scale and parafunctional habits // J. Oral Pathol. Med. 1995. Vol. 24, № 7. P. 289–292.
Gunes A. et al. Trigeminal nerve and pathologies in magnetic resonance imaging – a pictorial review // Polish J. Radiol. 2018. Vol. 83. P. 289–296.
Zhao Y.-X. et al. Trigeminal somatosensory-evoked potential // Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. Vol. 96, № 3. P. e5872.
Whyte A., Matias M.A.T.J. Imaging of orofacial pain // J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2020. Vol. 49, № 6. P. 490–498.
Edvardsson B., Persson S. Cluster Headache and Parietal Glioblastoma Multiforme // Neurologist. 2012. Vol. 18, № 4. P. 206–207.
Levy M.J., Robertson I., Howlett T.A. Cluster Headache Secondary to Macroprolactinoma with Ipsilateral Cavernous Sinus Invasion // Case Rep. Neurol. Med. 2012. Vol. 2012. P. 1–3.
Porta‐Etessam J. et al. Clusterlike Headache as First Manifestation of a Prolactinoma // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2001. Vol. 41, № 7. P. 723–725.
Chitsantikul P., Becker W.J. SUNCT, SUNA and pituitary tumors: Clinical characteristics and treatment // Cephalalgia. 2013. Vol. 33, № 3. P. 160–170.
Jiménez Caballero P.E., Portilla Cuenca J.C., Casado Naranjo I. Short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms (SUNA) secondary to epidermoid cyst in the right cerebellopontine angle successfully treated with surgery // J. Headache Pain. 2011. Vol. 12, № 3. P. 385–387.
Jacob S., Rajabally Y. Short-Lasting Unilateral Neuralgiform Headache with Cranial Autonomic Symptoms (SUNA) Following Vertebral Artery Dissection // Cephalalgia. 2007. Vol. 27, № 3. P. 283–285.
Murphy T.P., Teller D.C. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Facial Nerve During Bell’s Palsy // Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 1991. Vol. 105, № 5. P. 667–674.
Saatçi I. et al. MRI of the facial nerve in idiopathic facial palsy // Eur. Radiol. 1996. Vol. 6, № 5. P. 631–636.
Kinoshita T. et al. Facial Nerve Palsy: Evaluation by Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging // Clin. Radiol. 2001. Vol. 56, № 11. P. 926–932.
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 928n dated November 15, 2012, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Accidents."
Breadon G.E., Cody D.T.R., Weilandz L.H. Facial palsy: Unusual Etiology // Laryngoscope. 1977. Vol. 87, № 1. P. 26–34.
Klimkin A. V., Voitenkov V.B., Skripchenko N. V. Neurosonography of the facial nerve in children with idiopathic neuropathy of facial nerve // Zhurnal Nevrol. i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2017. Vol. 117, № 12. P. 52.
Petrikov S.S. et al. Neuroimaging in facial nerve neuropathy // Russ. Neurol. J. 2023. Vol. 28, № 4. P. 24–34.
Guenette J.P. et al. MR Imaging of the Extracranial Facial Nerve with the CISS Sequence // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2019.
Lee M.-K. et al. Identification of the intraparotid facial nerve on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. Radiol. 2021. Vol. 31, № 2. P. 629–639.
Dreizin D. et al. CT of Skull Base Fractures: Classification Systems, Complications, and Management // RadioGraphics. 2021. Vol. 41, № 3. P. 762–782.
Rajati M. et al. Accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography in locating facial nerve injury sites in temporal bone trauma // Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2014. Vol. 271, № 8. P. 2185–2189.
Stewart K.E., Bannon R., Bannister M. Benign parotid mass and facial palsy: systematic review. // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2021. Vol. 103, № 1. P. 47–52.
Kim J.K. et al. Ultrasonographic Localization of Parotid Gland Tumor Relative to the Facial Nerve Using Stensen’s Duct Criterion // J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2023. Vol. 81, № 8. P. 1055–1061.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Facial neuropathy: to operate or not? // Nervous Diseases. 2023. Vol. 4. P. 76–84.
Khedr E.M. et al. Prognostic role of neurophysiological testing 3–7 days after onset of acute unilateral Bell’s palsy // Neurophysiol. Clin. 2018. Vol. 48, № 2. P. 111–117.
OLSEN P.Z. PREDICTION OF RECOVERY IN BELL’S PALSY // Acta Neurol. Scand. 2009. Vol. 52. P. 1–119.
Savitskaya N.G. et al. Electromyography: prognosis and evaluation of therapy efficacy in Bell's palsy // Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2011. Vol. 3. P. 60–64.
Savitskaya N.G. et al. Capabilities of electromyography in predicting recovery in idiopathic facial neuropathy // Neuromuscular Diseases. 2012. Vol. 4. P. 36–42.
Kim J. et al. Surgical Reconsideration of Traumatic Facial Paralysis // Otol. Neurotol. 2022. Vol. 43, № 8. P. 968–972.
Gantz B.J. et al. Surgical Management of Bell’s Palsy // Laryngoscope. 1999. Vol. 109, № 8. P. 1177–1188.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Clinical case of facial muscle function recovery in a female patient with traumatic lesion of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve with paralysis of the depressor anguli oris muscle // Nervous Diseases. 2022. Vol. 3. P. 52–55.
Chekhonatskaya K.I. et al. Clinical Case of Facial Muscles Function Recovery in a Patient With Idiopathic Lesions of the Facial Nerve With Unfavorable Myographic Predictors // Russ. Sklifosovsky J. “Emergency Med. Care.” 2021. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 216–223.
Fischbein N.J. et al. MR imaging in two cases of subacute denervation change in the muscles of facial expression. // AJNR. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2001. Vol. 22, № 5. P. 880–884.
Kaylie D.M., Wax M.K., Weissman J.L. Preoperative facial muscle imaging predicts final facial function after facial nerve grafting. // AJNR. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2003. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 326–330.
Farrugia M.E. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of facial muscles // Clin. Radiol. 2007. Vol. 62, № 11. P. 1078–1086.
Hermier M. Imaging of hemifacial spasm // Neurochirurgie. 2018. Vol. 64, № 2. P. 117–123.
Garcia M. et al. High-Resolution 3D-Constructive Interference in Steady-State MR Imaging and 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography in Neurovascular Compression: A Comparison between 3T and 1.5T // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012. Vol. 33, № 7. P. 1251–1256.
Zakrzewska J.M. Diagnosis and Differential Diagnosis of Trigeminal Neuralgia // Clin. J. Pain. 2002. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 14–21.
Hegarty A.M., Zakrzewska J.M. Differential diagnosis for orofacial pain, including sinusitis, tmd, trigeminal neuralgia // Dent. Update. 2011. Vol. 38, № 6. P. 396–408.
Melek L.N., Devine M., Renton T. The psychosocial impact of orofacial pain in trigeminal neuralgia patients: a systematic review // Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2018. Vol. 47, № 7. P. 869–878.
Zakrzewska J.M., Patsalos P.N. Long-term cohort study comparing medical (oxcarbazepine) and surgical management of intractable trigeminal neuralgia // Pain. 2002. Vol. 95, № 3. P. 259–266.
Spatz A.L., Zakrzewska J.M., Kay E.J. Decision analysis of medical and surgical treatments for trigeminal neuralgia: How patient evaluations of benefits and risks affect the utility of treatment decisions // Pain. 2007. Vol. 131, № 3. P. 302–310.
Di Stefano G., Maarbjerg S., Truini A. Trigeminal neuralgia secondary to multiple sclerosis: from the clinical picture to the treatment options // J. Headache Pain. 2019. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 20.
Ferraro D. et al. Characteristics and treatment of Multiple Sclerosis-related trigeminal neuralgia: An Italian multi-centre study // Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2020. Vol. 37. P. 101461.
Cibirka R.M., Nelson S.K., Lefebvre C.A. Burning mouth syndrome: A review of etiologies // J. Prosthet. Dent. 1997. Vol. 78, № 1. P. 93–97.
Giannakopoulos N.N. et al. Anxiety and depression in patients with chronic temporomandibular pain and in controls // J. Dent. 2010. Vol. 38, № 5. P. 369–376.
Velly A.M. et al. The effect of catastrophizing and depression on chronic pain – a prospective cohort study of temporomandibular muscle and joint pain disorders // Pain. 2011. Vol. 152, № 10. P. 2377–2383.
Dahan H. et al. Specific and number of comorbidities are associated with increased levels of temporomandibular pain intensity and duration // J. Headache Pain. 2015. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 47.
National Guideline Centre (UK). Evidence review for psychological therapy for chronic primary pain: Chronic pain (primary and secondary) in over 16s: assessment of all chronic pain and management of chronic primary pain: Evidence review F. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2021 Apr. (NICE Guideline, No. 193.) Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK569983/ [Electronic resource].
Werner R.N. et al. European consensus‐based (S2k) Guideline on the Management of Herpes Zoster – guided by the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) in cooperation with the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV), Part 2: Treatment // J. Eur. Acad. Dermatology Venereol. 2017. Vol. 31, № 1. P. 20–29.
Gross G.E. et al. S2k guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia // JDDG J. der Dtsch. Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. 2020. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 55–78.
Renton T. Dental (Odontogenic) Pain. // Rev. pain. 2011. Vol. 5, № 1. P. 2–7.
World Dental Federation F. Odontogenic Pain Management: Adopted by the FDI General Assembly: August 2017, Madrid, Spain. // Int. Dent. J. 2018. Vol. 68, № 1. P. 20–21.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Screening diagnostics of emotional distress in patients with facial neuropathy // Russ. Neurol. J. 2022. Vol. 27, № 3. P. 47–53.
Rakhmanina A.A. et al. Psychological Factors of Emotional Disadaptation in Patients with Facial Movement Disorders // Clin. Psychol. Spec. Educ. 2022. Vol. 11, № 4. P. 159–178.
Casazza G.C., Schwartz S.R., Gurgel R.K. Systematic Review of Facial Nerve Outcomes After Middle Fossa Decompression and Transmastoid Decompression for Bell’s Palsy With Complete Facial Paralysis // Otol. Neurotol. 2018. Vol. 39, № 10. P. 1311–1318.
Wang P. et al. Effects of Surgical Timing of Facial Nerve Decompression for Patients With Severe Bell’s Palsy. // Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2023. Vol. 29, № 2. P. 70–75.
Wang P. et al. [Effect analysis of facial nerve decompression surgery in the treatment of Bell’s palsy and Hunt syndrome]. // Lin Chung. Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2024. Vol. 38, № 5. P. 391–394.
Berania I. et al. Delayed facial nerve decompression for severe refractory cases of Bell’s palsy: A 25-year experience // J. Otolaryngol. - Head Neck Surg. 2018. Vol. 47, № 1.
Han J.H. et al. Facial reanimation using hypoglossal-facial nerve anastomosis after schwannoma removal // Acta Otolaryngol. 2017. Vol. 137, № 1. P. 99–105.
Socolovsky M. et al. Bell′s palsy and partial hypoglossal to facial nerve transfer: Case presentation and literature review // Surg. Neurol. Int. 2012. Vol. 3, № 1. P. 46.
Kim L., Byrne P.J. Controversies in Contemporary Facial Reanimation // Facial Plast. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2016. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 275–297.
Harris B.N., Tollefson T.T. Facial reanimation // Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2015. Vol. 23, № 5. P. 399–406.
Faria J.C.M. et al. Muscle Transplants for Facial Reanimation // Ann. Plast. Surg. 2009. Vol. 63, № 2. P. 148–152.
Guntinas-Lichius O., Genther D.J., Byrne P.J. Facial Reconstruction and Rehabilitation. 2016. P. 120–131.
Azizzadeh B., Pettijohn K.J. The Gracilis Free Flap // Facial Plast. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2016. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 47–60.
Ueda K. et al. Combination of Hypoglossal-Facial Nerve Jump Graft by End-to-Side Neurorrhaphy and Cross-Face Nerve Graft for the Treatment of Facial Paralysis // J. Reconstr. Microsurg. 2007. Vol. 23, № 4. P. 181–187.
Biglioli F. et al. Masseteric–facial nerve neurorrhaphy: results of a case series // J. Neurosurg. 2017. Vol. 126, № 1. P. 312–318.
Cotrufo S. et al. Topographic anatomy of the nerve to masseter: An anatomical and clinical study // J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2011. Vol. 64, № 11. P. 1424–1429.
Fournier H.-D. et al. An anatomical study of the motor distribution of the mandibular nerve for a masseteric-facial anastomosis to restore facial function // Surg. Radiol. Anat. 1997. Vol. 19, № 4. P. 241–244.
Faria J.C.M., Scopel G.P., Ferreira M.C. Facial Reanimation With Masseteric Nerve // Ann. Plast. Surg. 2010. Vol. 64, № 1. P. 31–34.
Coombs C.J. et al. Masseteric-facial nerve coaptation – an alternative technique for facial nerve reinnervation // J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2009. Vol. 62, № 12. P. 1580–1588.
Ahuja R.B., Chatterjee P. Contemporary Solutions for the Treatment of Facial Nerve Paralysis // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2016. Vol. 137, № 2. P. 482e-483e.
Owusu Boahene K.D. Temporalis Muscle Tendon Unit Transfer for Smile Restoration After Facial Paralysis // Facial Plast. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2016. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 37–45.
Namavarian A. et al. Selective Neurectomy for Postfacial Paralysis Synkinesis: A Systematic Review // Facial Plast. Surg. 2024.
Azizzadeh B. et al. Modified Selective Neurectomy for the Treatment of Post–Facial Paralysis Synkinesis // Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2019. Vol. 143, № 5. P. 1483–1496.
Azizzadeh B., Frisenda J.L. Surgical Management of Postparalysis Facial Palsy and Synkinesis // Otolaryngol. Clin. North Am. 2018. Vol. 51, № 6. P. 1169–1178.
Holste K. et al. Spasm Freedom Following Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // World Neurosurg. 2020. Vol. 139. P. e383–e390.
Wolff Fernandes F., Krauss J.K. Microvascular Decompression: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 100 Most Cited Articles // World Neurosurg. 2022. Vol. 164. P. e67–e81.
Rao S., Rao S.J., Raghani M. Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia, An Usually Overlooked Diagnosis: A Prospective Single Center Observation Study // Indian J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2022. Vol. 74, № S2. P. 1955–1960.
Revuelta-Gutiérrez R. et al. Glossopharyngeal and vagoglossopharyngeal neuralgia: Long-term surgical outcomes in a single institution // Surg. Neurol. Int. 2023. Vol. 14. P. 267.
Bendtsen L. et al. European Academy of Neurology guideline on trigeminal neuralgia // Eur. J. Neurol. 2019. Vol. 26, № 6. P. 831–849.
Chong M.S., Bahra A., Zakrzewska J.M. Guidelines for the management of trigeminal neuralgia // Cleve. Clin. J. Med. 2023. Vol. 90, № 6. P. 355–362.
Neurology. Pharmacotherapy Without Errors. A Guide for Physicians / ed. by A.A. Skoromets, A.V. Amelin. Moscow: E-noto, 2019. 608 p.
Royal College of Surgeons of England. Guidelines for the management of trigeminal neuralgia. 2021.
Hu X. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia // Clin. J. Pain. 2024. Vol. 40, № 6. P. 383–392.
Morra M.E. et al. Therapeutic efficacy and safety of Botulinum Toxin A Therapy in Trigeminal Neuralgia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // J. Headache Pain. 2016. Vol. 17, № 1. P. 63.
Zhang H. et al. Two doses of botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia: observation of therapeutic effect from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial // J. Headache Pain. 2014. Vol. 15, № 1. P. 65.
Herrero Babiloni A. et al. Non-invasive brain stimulation in chronic orofacial pain: a systematic review // J. Pain Res. 2018. Vol. Volume 11. P. 1445–1457.
Säisänen L. et al. Efficacy and tolerability in patients with chronic facial pain of two consecutive treatment periods of rTMS applied over the facial motor cortex, using protocols differing in stimulation frequency, duration, and train pattern // Neurophysiol. Clin. 2022. Vol. 52, № 2. P. 95–108.
Moore D. et al. A systematic review of rescue analgesic strategies in acute exacerbations of primary trigeminal neuralgia // Br. J. Anaesth. 2019. Vol. 123, № 2. P. e385–e396.
Zúñiga C. et al. Acute Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia With Onabotulinum Toxin A // Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2013. Vol. 36, № 5. P. 146–150.
Hsu C.-C. et al. Rapid Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia and Comorbid Major Depressive Disorder With Duloxetine // Ann. Pharmacother. 2014. Vol. 48, № 8. P. 1090–1092.
Carasso R.L., Yehuda S., Streifler M. Clomipramine and Amitriptyline in the Treatment of Severe Pain // Int. J. Neurosci. 1979. Vol. 9, № 3. P. 191–194.
Gallagher H.C. et al. Venlafaxine for neuropathic pain in adults // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015. Vol. 2017, № 6.
Lunn M.P., Hughes R.A., Wiffen P.J. Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014. Vol. 2015, № 10.
Birkinshaw H. et al. Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2023. Vol. 2023, № 5.
Anand K.S. et al. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of duloxetine in idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia. // J. Indian Med. Assoc. 2011. Vol. 109, № 4. P. 264–266.
Latysheva N.V., Filatova E.G. The Use of Antidepressants in General Clinical Practice: A Study Guide. Moscow, 2022.
Aggarwal V.R. et al. Psychosocial interventions for the management of chronic orofacial pain // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews / ed. Aggarwal V.R. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011.
Aggarwal V.R. et al. Psychosocial interventions for the management of chronic orofacial pain // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015. Vol. 2015, № 12.
Otis J.D. Managing Chronic Pain: Therapist Guide. Oxford University Press, 2007.
Khan A. et al. Management of myofascial pain dysfunction syndrome with meditation and yoga: Healing through natural therapy // Natl. J. Maxillofac. Surg. 2018. Vol. 9, № 2. P. 155.
Day M.A. et al. Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy for the Treatment of Headache Pain // Clin. J. Pain. 2014. Vol. 30, № 2. P. 152–161.
Ren H., Shen Y., Luo F. <p>Treatment of Supraorbital Neuralgia Using Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation of the Supraorbital Nerve: A Retrospective Study</p> // J. Pain Res. 2020. Vol. Volume 13. P. 251–259.
Xie K. et al. Effects of Supraorbital Foramen Variations on the Treatment Efficacy of Radiofrequency Therapy for V1 Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Study // Pain Res. Manag. 2020. Vol. 2020. P. 1–6.
Luo F. et al. High Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Refractory Neuralgia of the Infraorbital Nerve: A Prospective Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study. // Pain Physician. 2017. Vol. 20, № 4. P. 271–279.
Jia Y. et al. The Effectiveness and Safety of 42°C Pulsed Radiofrequency Combined with 60°C Continuous Radiofrequency for Refractory Infraorbital Neuralgia: A Prospective Study. // Pain Physician. 2019. Vol. 22, № 3. P. E171–E179.
Sun Z. et al. Effectiveness and Safety of Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Treatment Guided by Computed Tomography for Infraorbital Neuralgia Following Failed Conservative Treatment: A Retrospective Study // J. Pain Res. 2023. Vol. Volume 16. P. 1005–1015.
M M. et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effect of Two-Time Durations of Balloon Compression During Percutaneous Balloon Compression in Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia. // Pain Physician. 2024. Vol. 27, № 1. P. 21–26.
Jia Y. et al. Effectiveness and safety of high-voltage pulsed radiofrequency to treat patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled study // J. Headache Pain. 2023. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 91.
Howng S.L., Chang D.S. Partial sensory rhizotomy as an alternative treatment of trigeminal neuralgia. // Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 1998. Vol. 14, № 8. P. 492–497.
Díaz-Molina J. et al. Partial sensory rhizotomy in recurrent trigeminal neuralgia. Our experience and literature review // Neurocir. (English Ed. 2024.
Arias M.J. Percutaneous retrogasserian glycerol rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia // J. Neurosurg. 1986. Vol. 65, № 1. P. 32–36.
Harries A.M., Mitchell R.D. Percutaneous glycerol rhizotomy for trigeminal neuralgia: safety and efficacy of repeat procedures // Br. J. Neurosurg. 2011. Vol. 25, № 2. P. 268–272.
Chen L. et al. Endoscopic microvascular decompression versus microscopic microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Clin. Neurosci. 2023. Vol. 117. P. 73–78.
Hannan C., Shoakazemi A., Quigley G. Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A regional unit’s experience. // Ulster Med. J. 2018. Vol. 87, № 1. P. 30–33.
Andersen A.S.S. et al. Microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia - a prospective study of 115 patients. // J. Headache Pain. 2022. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 145.
Uhl C. et al. Transposition versus interposition method in microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: midterm analysis of both techniques in a single-center study // J. Neurosurg. 2024. P. 1–8.
Mansano A.M. et al. Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation for Trigeminal Neuralgia Management: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial // Pain Med. 2023. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 234–243.
Tuleasca C. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: a systematic review // J. Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 130, № 3. P. 733–757.
Klein J. et al. Peripheral nerve field stimulation for trigeminal neuralgia, trigeminal neuropathic pain, and persistent idiopathic facial pain // Cephalalgia. 2016. Vol. 36, № 5. P. 445–453.
Gallay M.N., Moser D., Jeanmonod D. MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Central Lateral Thalamotomy for Trigeminal Neuralgia. Single Center Experience // Front. Neurol. 2020. Vol. 11.
Urgosik D., Liscak R. Medial Gamma Knife thalamotomy for intractable pain // J. Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 129, № Suppl1. P. 72–76.
Zakrzewska J.M., Wu J., Brathwaite T.S.-L. A Systematic Review of the Management of Trigeminal Neuralgia in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis // World Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 111. P. 291–306.
Abouharb A., Rathnayake H., Mehta S. The efficacy of surgery over stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of tumor-related trigeminal neuralgia // Chinese Neurosurg. J. 2024. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 27.
Kim J.H. et al. Pulsed and Conventional Radiofrequency Treatment: Which Is Effective for Dental Procedure-Related Symptomatic Trigeminal Neuralgia? // Pain Med. 2013. Vol. 14, № 3. P. 430–435.
Peciu-Florianu I. et al. Trigeminal Neuralgia Secondary to Meningiomas and Vestibular Schwannoma Is Improved after Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 2021. Vol. 99, № 1. P. 6–16.
Sharav Y. et al. The analgesic effect of amitriptyline on chronic facial pain // Pain. 1987. Vol. 31, № 2. P. 199–209.
Forssell H. et al. Venlafaxine in the treatment of atypical facial pain: a randomized controlled trial. // J. Orofac. Pain. 2004. Vol. 18, № 2. P. 131–137.
Cuadrado M.-L. et al. Botulinum Neurotoxin Type-A for the Treatment of Atypical Odontalgia // Pain Med. 2016. Vol. 17, № 9. P. 1717–1721.
Liu Y. et al. Burning mouth syndrome: a systematic review of treatments // Oral Dis. 2018. Vol. 24, № 3. P. 325–334.
McMillan R. et al. Interventions for treating burning mouth syndrome // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016. Vol. 2016, № 11.
Lopez-D alessandro E., Escovich L. Combination of alpha lipoic acid and gabapentin, its efficacy in the treatment of Burning Mouth Syndrome: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial // Med. Oral Patol. Oral y Cir. Bucal. 2011. P. e635–e640.
Ta L.E., Dionne R.A. Treatment of painful temporomandibular joints with a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: a randomized placebo-controlled comparison of celecoxib to naproxen // Pain. 2004. Vol. 111, № 1. P. 13–21.
Ferrillo M. et al. Pain Management and Rehabilitation for Central Sensitization in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Comprehensive Review // Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022. Vol. 23, № 20. P. 12164.
Karateev A.E. et al. RATIONAL USE OF NONSTEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS. CLINICAL GUIDELINES // Rheumatol. Sci. Pract. 2018. Vol. 56. P. 1–29.
Castellsague J. et al. Risk of upper gastrointestinal complications in a cohort of users of nimesulide and other nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs in Friuli Venezia Giulia, Italy // Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2013. Vol. 22, № 4. P. 365–375.
Castellsague J. et al. Individual NSAIDs and Upper Gastrointestinal Complications // Drug Saf. 2012. Vol. 35, № 12. P. 1127–1146.
Lapeyre‐Mestre M., Grolleau S., Montastruc J. Adverse drug reactions associated with the use of NSAIDs: a case/noncase analysis of spontaneous reports from the French pharmacovigilance database 2002–2006 // Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013. Vol. 27, № 2. P. 223–230.
Kimos P. et al. Analgesic action of gabapentin on chronic pain in the masticatory muscles: A randomized controlled trial // Pain. 2007. Vol. 127, № 1. P. 151–160.
Abboud W.A. et al. Localized myofascial pain responds better than referring myofascial pain to botulinum toxin injections // Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2017. Vol. 46, № 11. P. 1417–1423.
Patel J., Cardoso J.A., Mehta S. A systematic review of botulinum toxin in the management of patients with temporomandibular disorders and bruxism // Br. Dent. J. 2019. Vol. 226, № 9. P. 667–672.
Thambar S. et al. Botulinum toxin in the management of temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review // Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2020. Vol. 58, № 5. P. 508–519.
Harrison S. et al. A comparison of antidepressant medication alone and in conjunction with cognitive behavioural therapy for chronic idiopathic facial pain. 1997. 663–672 p.
Bergdahl J., Anneroth G., Ferris H. Cognitive therapy in the treatment of patients with resistant burning mouth syndrome: a controlled study // J. Oral Pathol. Med. 1995. Vol. 24, № 5. P. 213–215.
Miziara I.D. et al. Group psychotherapy: An additional approach to burning mouth syndrome // J. Psychosom. Res. 2009. Vol. 67, № 5. P. 443–448.
Florjanski W. et al. Evaluation of Biofeedback Usefulness in Masticatory Muscle Activity Management—A Systematic Review // J. Clin. Med. 2019. Vol. 8, № 6. P. 766.
Barker S., Urbanek M., Penlington C. Psychological Interventions for Persistent Orofacial Pain // Prim. Dent. J. 2018. Vol. 7, № 4. P. 30–34.
Bayer E. et al. Sphenopalatine Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment in 30 Patients Suffering from Chronic Face and Head Pain // Pain Pract. 2005. Vol. 5, № 3. P. 223–227.
Wiffen P.J. et al. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017. Vol. 2020, № 2.
Derry S. et al. Pregabalin for neuropathic pain in adults // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019.
Bockbrader H.N. et al. A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Pregabalin and Gabapentin // Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2010. Vol. 49, № 10. P. 661–669.
Patel R., Dickenson A.H. Mechanisms of the gabapentinoids and α 2 δ ‐1 calcium channel subunit in neuropathic pain // Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2016. Vol. 4, № 2.
Zhou M. et al. Oxcarbazepine for neuropathic pain // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017. Vol. 2017, № 12.
Urquhart D.M. et al. Efficacy of Low-Dose Amitriptyline for Chronic Low Back Pain // JAMA Intern. Med. 2018. Vol. 178, № 11. P. 1474.
Moore R.A. et al. Amitriptyline for neuropathic pain in adults // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015. Vol. 2019, № 5.
Aiyer R., Barkin R.L., Bhatia A. Treatment of Neuropathic Pain with Venlafaxine: A Systematic Review // Pain Med. 2016. P. pnw261.
Finnerup N.B. et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Lancet Neurol. 2015. Vol. 14, № 2. P. 162–173.
Baron R., Mahn F. Topische Therapieformen bei peripheren neuropathischen Schmerzen // Der Schmerz. 2010. Vol. 24, № 4. P. 317–325.
Derry S. et al. Topical lidocaine for neuropathic pain in adults // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews / ed. Derry S. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2014.
Freo U., Romualdi P., Kress H.G. <p>Tapentadol for neuropathic pain: a review of clinical studies</p> // J. Pain Res. 2019. Vol. Volume 12. P. 1537–1551.
Atkinson T.J. et al. Medication Pain Management in the Elderly: Unique and Underutilized Analgesic Treatment Options // Clin. Ther. 2013. Vol. 35, № 11. P. 1669–1689.
Gaskell H. et al. Oxycodone for neuropathic pain in adults // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016. Vol. 2016, № 7.
Duehmke R.M. et al. Tramadol for neuropathic pain in adults // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017. Vol. 2017, № 6.
Cooper T.E. et al. Morphine for chronic neuropathic pain in adults // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017. Vol. 2019, № 5.
Nucynta E.R. (tapentadol HCl) [package insert]. http://www.ac cessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_ docs/label/2012/200533s001lbl. pdf. Accessed August 14, 2013 [Electronic resource].
Viana M.D.M. et al. Alpha-Lipoic Acid as an Antioxidant Strategy for Managing Neuropathic Pain. // Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland). 2022. Vol. 11, № 12.
Priyank H. et al. Management protocols of chronic Orofacial Pain: A Systematic Review // Saudi Dent. J. 2023. Vol. 35, № 5. P. 395–402.
Dekhne A. et al. Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin in the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain: A Literature Review // Cureus. 2023.
Park J., Park H. Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain // Toxins (Basel). 2017. Vol. 9, № 9. P. 260.
Carneiro B.D., Tavares I. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Treat Neuropathic Pain: A Bibliometric Analysis // Healthcare. 2024. Vol. 12, № 5. P. 555.
Baron R., Wasner G. Prevention and treatment of postherpetic neuralgia // Lancet. 2006. Vol. 367, № 9506. P. 186–188.
Peng Z. et al. Effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on patients with herpes zoster. // Undersea Hyperb. Med. 2012. Vol. 39, № 6. P. 1083–1087.
Schiavo S. et al. Mechanistic Rationale and Clinical Efficacy of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Chronic Neuropathic Pain: An Evidence-Based Narrative Review // Pain Res. Manag. 2021. Vol. 2021. P. 1–20.
Chan A.S. et al. Phase II study of alpha‐tocopherol in improving the cognitive function of patients with temporal lobe radionecrosis // Cancer. 2004. Vol. 100, № 2. P. 398–404.
Chung C., Bryant A., Brown P.D. Interventions for the treatment of brain radionecrosis after radiotherapy or radiosurgery // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018. Vol. 2018, № 7.
Gothard L. et al. Phase II study of vitamin E and pentoxifylline in patients with late side effects of pelvic radiotherapy // Radiother. Oncol. 2005. Vol. 75, № 3. P. 334–341.
Arqueros-Lemus M. et al. Pentoxifylline and tocopherol for the treatment of osteoradionecrosis of the jaws. A systematic review // Med. Oral Patol. Oral y Cir. Bucal. 2023. P. e293–e300.
Co J. et al. Hyperbaric Oxygen for Radiation Necrosis of the Brain // Can. J. Neurol. Sci. / J. Can. des Sci. Neurol. 2020. Vol. 47, № 1. P. 92–99.
Bernhardt D. et al. DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 2: treatment // Strahlentherapie und Onkol. 2022. Vol. 198, № 11. P. 971–980.
Brown J.A., Pilitsis J.G. Motor Cortex Stimulation for Central and Neuropathic Facial Pain: A Prospective Study of 10 Patients and Observations of Enhanced Sensory and Motor Function during Stimulation // Neurosurgery. 2005. Vol. 56, № 2. P. 290–297.
Rasche D., Tronnier V.M. Clinical Significance of Invasive Motor Cortex Stimulation for Trigeminal Facial Neuropathic Pain Syndromes // Neurosurgery. 2016. Vol. 79, № 5. P. 655–666.
Kolodziej M. et al. Treatment of Central Deafferentation and Trigeminal Neuropathic Pain by Motor Cortex Stimulation: Report of a Series of 20 Patients // J. Neurol. Surg. Part A Cent. Eur. Neurosurg. 2015. Vol. 77, № 01. P. 052–058.
Li H. et al. Effective Treatment of Postherpetic Neuralgia at the First Branch of the Trigeminal Nerve by High-Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency // Front. Neurol. 2021. Vol. 12.
Zhang H. et al. Supraorbital Nerve Radiofrequency for Severe Neuralgia Caused by Herpes Zoster Ophthalmicus // Pain Res. Manag. 2020. Vol. 2020. P. 1–7.
Johnson M.D., Burchiel K.J. Peripheral stimulation for treatment of trigeminal postherpetic neuralgia and trigeminal posttraumatic neuropathic pain: a pilot study. // Neurosurgery. 2004. Vol. 55, № 1. P. 135–141; discussion 141-2.
Texakalidis P. et al. Peripheral trigeminal branch stimulation for refractory facial pain: A single-center experience // Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2020. Vol. 194. P. 105819.
Ellis J.A., Mejia Munne J.C., Winfree C.J. Trigeminal branch stimulation for the treatment of intractable craniofacial pain // J. Neurosurg. 2015. Vol. 123, № 1. P. 283–288.
William A. et al. Trigeminal and sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for intractable craniofacial pain—case series and literature review // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 2016. Vol. 158, № 3. P. 513–520.
Slavin K. V. et al. Trigeminal and occipital peripheral nerve stimulation for craniofacial pain: a single-institution experience and review of the literature // Neurosurg. Focus. 2006. Vol. 21, № 6. P. 1–5.
Anisimov E.D. et al. Open and Percutaneous Trigeminal Nucleotractotomy: A Case Series and Literature Review // Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 2023. Vol. 101, № 6. P. 387–394.
Chivukula S. et al. Spinal and Nucleus Caudalis Dorsal Root Entry Zone Lesioning for Chronic Pain: Efficacy and Outcomes // World Neurosurg. 2015. Vol. 84, № 2. P. 494–504.
Kanpolat Y. et al. SPINAL AND NUCLEUS CAUDALIS DORSAL ROOT ENTRY ZONE OPERATIONS FOR CHRONIC PAIN // Oper. Neurosurg. 2008. Vol. 62, № 3. P. 235–244.
Cohen A.S., Burns B., Goadsby P.J. High-Flow Oxygen for Treatment of Cluster Headache // JAMA. 2009. Vol. 302, № 22. P. 2451.
Medrea I. et al. Network meta‐analysis of therapies for cluster headache: Effects of acute therapies for episodic and chronic cluster // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2022. Vol. 62, № 4. P. 482–511.
Oude Nijhuis J.C., Haane D.Y., Koehler P.J. A review of the current and potential oxygen delivery systems and techniques utilized in cluster headache attacks // Cephalalgia. 2016. Vol. 36, № 10. P. 970–979.
Petersen A.S. et al. Oxygen therapy for cluster headache. A mask comparison trial. A single-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study // Cephalalgia. 2017. Vol. 37, № 3. P. 214–224.
Evers S., Rapoport A. The use of oxygen in cluster headache treatment worldwide – a survey of the International Headache Society (IHS) // Cephalalgia. 2017. Vol. 37, № 4. P. 396–398.
Fogan L. Treatment of Cluster Headache // Arch. Neurol. 1985. Vol. 42, № 4. P. 362.
Kudrow L. Response of Cluster Headache Attacks to Oxygen Inhalation // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 1981. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 1–4.
May A. et al. European Academy of Neurology guidelines on the treatment of cluster headache // Eur. J. Neurol. 2023. Vol. 30, № 10. P. 2955–2979.
Law S., Derry S., Moore R.A. Triptans for acute cluster headache // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013. Vol. 2018, № 5.
Cittadini E. et al. Effectiveness of Intranasal Zolmitriptan in Acute Cluster Headache // Arch. Neurol. 2006. Vol. 63, № 11. P. 1537.
Robbins L. Intranasal Lidocaine for Cluster Headache // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 1995. Vol. 35, № 2. P. 83–84.
Barzegari H. et al. Intranasal Lidocaine for Primary Headache Management in Emergency Department; a Clinical Trial. // Emerg. (Tehran, Iran). 2017. Vol. 5, № 1. P. e79.
Petersen A.S. et al. Verapamil and Cluster Headache: Still a Mystery. A Narrative Review of Efficacy, Mechanisms and Perspectives // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2019. Vol. 59, № 8. P. 1198–1211.
Leone M. et al. Verapamil in the prophylaxis of episodic cluster headache: A double-blind study versus placebo // Neurology. 2000. Vol. 54, № 6. P. 1382–1385.
Bussone G. et al. Double Blind Comparison of Lithium and Verapamil in Cluster Headache Prophylaxis // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 1990. Vol. 30, № 7. P. 411–417.
Obermann M. et al. Safety and efficacy of prednisone versus placebo in short-term prevention of episodic cluster headache: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial // Lancet Neurol. 2021. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 29–37.
Steiner T. et al. Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Lithium in Episodic Cluster Headache // Cephalalgia. 1997. Vol. 17, № 6. P. 673–675.
Leone M. et al. Melatonin Versus Placebo in the Prophylaxis of Cluster Headache // Cephalalgia. 1996. Vol. 16, № 7. P. 494–496.
Pringsheim T. et al. Melatonin as Adjunctive Therapy in the Prophylaxis of Cluster Headache: A Pilot Study // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2002. Vol. 42, № 8. P. 787–792.
Huang W. et al. Topiramate in prevention of cluster headache in the Taiwanese // Neurol. India. 2010. Vol. 58, № 2. P. 284.
Leone M. et al. Topiramate in Cluster Headache Prophylaxis: an Open Trial // Cephalalgia. 2003. Vol. 23, № 10. P. 1001–1002.
Ambrosini A. et al. Suboccipital injection with a mixture of rapid- and long-acting steroids in cluster headache: A double-blind placebo-controlled study // Pain. 2005. Vol. 118, № 1. P. 92–96.
Leroux E. et al. Suboccipital steroid injections for transitional treatment of patients with more than two cluster headache attacks per day: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial // Lancet Neurol. 2011. Vol. 10, № 10. P. 891–897.
Busch V. et al. Occipital Nerve Blockade in Chronic Cluster Headache Patients and Functional Connectivity Between Trigeminal and Occipital Nerves // Cephalalgia. 2007. Vol. 27, № 11. P. 1206–1214.
Costa A. et al. The Effect of Intranasal Cocaine and Lidocaine on Nitroglycerin‐Induced Attacks in Cluster Headache // Cephalalgia. 2000. Vol. 20, № 2. P. 85–91.
Sanders M., Zuurmond W.W.A. Efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion blockade in 66 patients suffering from cluster headache: a 12- to 70-month follow-up evaluation // J. Neurosurg. 1997. Vol. 87, № 6. P. 876–880.
Fang L. et al. Computerized tomography-guided sphenopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment in 16 patients with refractory cluster headaches: Twelve- to 30-month follow-up evaluations // Cephalalgia. 2016. Vol. 36, № 2. P. 106–112.
Narouze S. et al. Sphenopalatine Ganglion Radiofrequency Ablation for the Management of Chronic Cluster Headache // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2009. Vol. 49, № 4. P. 571–577.
Bendersky D.C., Hem S.M., Yampolsky C.G. Unsuccessful Pulsed Radiofrequency of the Sphenopalatine Ganglion in Patients with Chronic Cluster Headache and Subsequent Successful Thermocoagulation // Pain Pract. 2015. Vol. 15, № 5.
Miller S., Watkins L., Matharu M. Treatment of intractable chronic cluster headache by occipital nerve stimulation: a cohort of 51 patients // Eur. J. Neurol. 2017. Vol. 24, № 2. P. 381–390.
Leone M. et al. Long-term occipital nerve stimulation for drug-resistant chronic cluster headache // Cephalalgia. 2017. Vol. 37, № 8. P. 756–763.
Fontaine D. et al. Occipital nerve stimulation improves the quality of life in medically-intractable chronic cluster headache: Results of an observational prospective study // Cephalalgia. 2017. Vol. 37, № 12. P. 1173–1179.
Dzhafarov V.M. et al. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation in the treatment of chronic refractory cluster headache. A preliminary multicenter study in Russia // Zhurnal Nevrol. i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2022. Vol. 122, № 2. P. 68.
Schoenen J. et al. Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: A randomized, sham-controlled study // Cephalalgia. 2013. Vol. 33, № 10. P. 816–830.
Goadsby P.J. et al. Safety and efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for chronic cluster headache: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial // Lancet Neurol. 2019. Vol. 18, № 12. P. 1081–1090.
Barloese M. et al. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for cluster headache, results from a large, open-label European registry // J. Headache Pain. 2018. Vol. 19, № 1. P. 6.
Pareja J.A., Sjaastad O. Chronic Paroxysmal Hemicrania and Hemicrania Continua. Interval Between Indomethacin Administration and Response // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 1996. Vol. 36, № 1. P. 20–23.
Baraldi C. et al. Therapeutical approaches to paroxysmal hemicrania, hemicrania continua and short lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks: a critical appraisal // J. Headache Pain. 2017. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 71.
D’Andrea G. et al. Lamotrigine in the treatment of SUNCT syndrome // Neurology. 2001. Vol. 57, № 9. P. 1723–1725.
Gutierrez‐Garcia J.M. SUNCT Syndrome Responsive to Lamotrigine // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2002. Vol. 42, № 8. P. 823–825.
Graff-Radford S. SUNCT Syndrome Responsive to Gabapentin (Neurontin) // Cephalalgia. 2000. Vol. 20, № 5. P. 515–517.
Etemadifar M. et al. Efficacy of Gabapentin in the Treatment of SUNCT Syndrome // Cephalalgia. 2008. Vol. 28, № 12. P. 1339–1342.
Kang M.-K., Cho S.-J. SUNCT, SUNA and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks: Debates and an update. // Cephalalgia. 2024. Vol. 44, № 2. P. 3331024241232256.
Matharu M., Cohen A., Goadsby P. SUNCT Syndrome Responsive to Intravenous Lidocaine // Cephalalgia. 2004. Vol. 24, № 11. P. 985–992.
Arroyo A.M. et al. Response to Intravenous Lidocaine in a Patient with SUNCT Syndrome // Cephalalgia. 2010. Vol. 30, № 1. P. 110–112.
Parkhomenko E.V. et al. SUNCT syndrome. From clinical diagnosis to the possibility of effective therapy // Medical Alphabet. 2017. Vol. 1, № 2. P. 33–40.
Cittadini E., Goadsby P.J. Hemicrania continua: a clinical study of 39 patients with diagnostic implications // Brain. 2010. Vol. 133, № 7. P. 1973–1986.
Ramsey M.J. et al. Corticosteroid Treatment for Idiopathic Facial Nerve Paralysis: A Meta‐analysis // Laryngoscope. 2000. Vol. 110, № 3. P. 335–341.
Abdu S.H. et al. Comparison of oral versus intravenous steroid in the management of Bell’s palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials // Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2024. Vol. 281, № 3. P. 1095–1104.
Madhok V.B. et al. Corticosteroids for Bell’s palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis) // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016. Vol. 2016, № 7.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Treatment of patients with facial neuropathy by practicing neurologists: online survey // Russ. Neurol. J. 2023. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 28–35.
Giri P. et al. Single dose intravenous methyl prednisolone versus oral prednisolone in Bell’s palsy: a randomized controlled trial. // Indian J. Pharmacol. 2015. Vol. 47, № 2. P. 143–147.
Kumar S, Anwar K, Kumar J. Comparative study of administration of single dose intravenous methyl prednisolone versus oral prednisolone in Bell’s palsy: an open labeled, randomized controlled trial // Int. J. Med. Heal. Res. 2021. Vol. 13. P. 138–143.
Verma S et al. Treatment of Bell’s palsy: comparing the administration of a single dose intravenous methyl prednisolone vs oral prednisolone: an open labeled, randomized controlled trial // Int. J. Med. Heal. Res. 2021. Vol. 13. P. 287–292.
Fujiwara T. et al. Intratympanic corticosteroid for Bell’s palsy and Ramsay Hunt syndrome: Systematic review and meta-analysis // Auris Nasus Larynx. 2022. Vol. 49, № 4. P. 599–605.
Gagyor I. et al. Antiviral treatment for Bell’s palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis) // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019. Vol. 2019, № 9.
Fu X. et al. A Network Meta-Analysis to Compare the Efficacy of Steroid and Antiviral Medications for Facial Paralysis from Bell´s Palsy. // Pain Physician. 2018. Vol. 21, № 6. P. 559–569.
Quant E.C. et al. The benefits of steroids versus steroids plus antivirals for treatment of Bell’s palsy: a meta-analysis // BMJ. 2009. Vol. 339, № sep07 1. P. b3354–b3354.
Sullivan F.M. et al. Early Treatment with Prednisolone or Acyclovir in Bell’s Palsy // N. Engl. J. Med. 2007. Vol. 357, № 16. P. 1598–1607.
Sullivan F. et al. A randomised controlled trial of the use of aciclovir and/or prednisolone for the early treatment of Bell’s palsy: the BELLS study // Health Technol. Assess. (Rockv). 2009. Vol. 13, № 47.
Engström M. et al. Prednisolone and valaciclovir in Bell’s palsy: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial // Lancet Neurol. 2008. Vol. 7, № 11. P. 993–1000.
de Almeida J.R. et al. Combined Corticosteroid and Antiviral Treatment for Bell Palsy // JAMA. 2009. Vol. 302, № 9. P. 985.
Fujiwara T., Uraguchi K. Antiviral treatment for Ramsay Hunt syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Auris Nasus Larynx. 2024. Vol. 51, № 3. P. 488–491.
Sanchez E. et al. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prevention of Lyme Disease, Human Granulocytic Anaplasmosis, and Babesiosis // JAMA. 2016. Vol. 315, № 16. P. 1767.
Skripchenko N.V., Golyakov D.A., Pulman N.F. Facial neuropathies: clinical features and possibilities for improving outcomes // Children's Infections. 2008. Vol. 7, № 3. P. 16–23.
Eccleston C. et al. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for chronic non-cancer pain in children and adolescents // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017.
Svistushkin V.M., Slavsky A.N. Facial neuropathy: modern approaches to diagnosis and treatment // RMJ. 2016. Vol. 24, № 4. P. 280–285.
Solovyova E.Yu. et al. Clinical guidelines for the use of neurotropic group B vitamins (B1, B6, and B12) for the treatment of peripheral neuropathy: a multidisciplinary expert group consensus // Nervnye bolezni. 2024. Vol. 1. P. 91–98.
Orlova O.R. et al. Botulinum therapy for facial nerve disorders in Russia // Russ. Neurol. J. 2024. Vol. 28, № 6. P. 34–40.
Saxonova E.V., Orlova O.R., Surovykh S.V. Restoration of facial symmetry using type A botulinum toxin // Metamorfozy. 2015. Vol. 10.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Botulinum Therapy in Facial Nerve Neuropathy // Russ. Neurol. J. 2020. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 23–28.
Akulov M. et al. Long-Term Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Therapy for Facial Nerve Neuropathy After Neurosurgical Interventions // Toxicon. 2024. Vol. 237. P. 107354.
Orlova O.R. et al. Correction of synkinesias with type A botulinum neuroprotein // Farmateka. 2019. Vol. 13. P. 37–41.
Akulov M.A. et al. Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of synkinesis: a clinical case report and literature review // Vestn. Nevrol. Psihiatr. i Nejrohir. (Bulletin Neurol. Psychiatry Neurosurgery). 2024. № 5. P. 562–570.
de Jongh F.W. et al. Botulinum toxin A treatment in facial palsy synkinesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2023. Vol. 280, № 4. P. 1581–1592.
Wei L.A., Diels J., Lucarelli M.J. Treating Buccinator With Botulinum Toxin in Patients With Facial Synkinesis // Ophthalmic Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2016. Vol. 32, № 2. P. 138–141.
Patel P.N. et al. Outcomes of Buccinator Treatment With Botulinum Toxin in Facial Synkinesis // JAMA Facial Plast. Surg. 2018. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 196–201.
Hetzler L.T. et al. Anatomic Considerations of Perinasal Musculature for Improved Dental Show During Smile in Facial Synkinesis // Facial Plast. Surg. Aesthetic Med. 2022. Vol. 24, № 2. P. 89–94.
Lindsay R.W. et al. A systematic algorithm for the management of lower lip asymmetry // Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2011. Vol. 32, № 1. P. 1–7.
Joseph S.S. et al. Evaluation of Patients with Facial Palsy and Ophthalmic Sequelae: A 23-Year Retrospective Review // Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2017. Vol. 24, № 5. P. 341–345.
MacIntosh P.W., Fay A.M. Update on the ophthalmic management of facial paralysis // Surv. Ophthalmol. 2019. Vol. 64, № 1. P. 79–89.
Kasatkin D.S. et al. Clinico-diagnostic and pathophysiological grounds of conservative and early surgical treatment methods of Bell palsy in the acute period // Russ. Neurol. J. 2021. Vol. 26, № 2. P. 4–10.
Steinhäuser J. et al. Multidisciplinary Care of Patients with Facial Palsy: Treatment of 1220 Patients in a German Facial Nerve Center // J. Clin. Med. 2022. Vol. 11, № 2. P. 427.
Bodénez C. et al. Facial nerve decompression for idiopathic Bell’s palsy: report of 13 cases and literature review // J. Laryngol. Otol. 2010. Vol. 124, № 3. P. 272–278.
McAllister K. et al. Surgical interventions for the early management of Bell’s palsy // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013.
Nerobeev A.I. Reconstructive surgery of soft tissues of the maxillofacial region / ed. by Nerobeev A.I., Plotnikov N.A. Moscow: Meditsina, 1997. 200 p.
Scaramella L.F. Cross-face facial nerve anastomosis: historical notes. // Ear. Nose. Throat J. 1996. Vol. 75, № 6. P. 343, 347–352, 354.
Peng G., Azizzadeh B. Cross-Facial Nerve Grafting for Facial Reanimation // Facial Plast. Surg. 2015. Vol. 31, № 02. P. 128–133.
Hayashi A. et al. Assessment of T-shape double fascia graft for lower lip deformity from facial paralysis: A questionnaire survey // J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2016. Vol. 69, № 3. P. 427–435.
Cabin J.A., Massry G.G., Azizzadeh B. Botulinum toxin in the management of facial paralysis // Curr. Opin. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2015. Vol. 23, № 4. P. 272–280.
Chi J.J. Management of the Eye in Facial Paralysis // Facial Plast. Surg. Clin. North Am. 2016. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 21–28.
Chopade T.R., Lui F., Bollu P.C. Hemifacial Spasm. 2024.
Green K.E., Rastall D., Eggenberger E. Treatment of Blepharospasm/Hemifacial Spasm // Curr. Treat. Options Neurol. 2017. Vol. 19, № 11. P. 41.
Kemp L.W., Reich S.G. Hemifacial spasm // Curr. Treat. Options Neurol. 2004. Vol. 6, № 3. P. 175–179.
Xiao L. et al. Botulinum toxin therapy of hemifacial spasm: bilateral injections can reduce facial asymmetry // J. Neurol. 2018. Vol. 265, № 9. P. 2097–2105.
Kongsaengdao S., Maneeton N., Maneeton B. The Five-Year Prospective Study of Quality of Life in Hemifacial Spasm Treated with Abo-Botulinum Toxin A // Toxins (Basel). 2021. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 215.
Jitpimolmard S. et al. A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Appropriate Site of Botulinum Toxin Therapy in Hemifacial Spasm // Adv. Ther. 2022. Vol. 39, № 5. P. 2025–2034.
Akulov M.A. et al. Higher efficacy of botulinum toxin therapy for hemifacial spasm recurrence after vascular decompression. Case report and literature review // Vopr. neirokhirurgii Im. N.N. Burdenko. 2022. Vol. 86, № 2. P. 89.
Akulov M.A. et al. Experience in treating hemifacial spasm combined with facial nerve neuropathy. A clinical case report // Vestn. Nevrol. Psihiatr. i Nejrohir. (Bulletin Neurol. Psychiatry Neurosurgery). 2024. № 3. P. 351–357.
Thirumala P.D. et al. The Utility of Intraoperative Lateral Spread Recording in Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Neurosurgery. 2020. Vol. 87, № 4. P. E473–E484.
Fraioli M. et al. Treatment of Idiopathic Hemifacial Spasm with Radiosurgery or Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy: Preliminary Results // min - Minim. Invasive Neurosurg. 2010. Vol. 53, № 01. P. 34–36.
Park J.S., Ahn Y.H. Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia. // J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2023. Vol. 66, № 1. P. 12–23.
Luef G., Poewe W. Oxcarbazepine in glossopharyngeal neuralgia: Clinical response and effect on serum lipids // Neurology. 2004. Vol. 63, № 12. P. 2447–2448.
Hamilton K.T. et al. Refractory glossopharyngeal neuralgia successfully treated with onabotulinumtoxinA: A case report // Headache J. Head Face Pain. 2022. Vol. 62, № 10. P. 1424–1428.
You S. et al. Long-Term Follow-Up of Ultrasound-Guided Glossopharyngeal Nerve Block Treatment for Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 43 Cases // J. Pain Res. 2024. Vol. Volume 17. P. 913–921.
Liu Q. et al. <p>Ultrasound-guided glossopharyngeal nerve block via the styloid process for glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a retrospective study</p> // J. Pain Res. 2019. Vol. Volume 12. P. 2503–2510.
Xia L. et al. Microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia: a retrospective analysis of 228 cases // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 2018. Vol. 160, № 1. P. 117–123.
Revuelta-Gutiérrez R. et al. Microvascular decompression for glossopharyngeal neuralgia through a microasterional approach: A case series // Surg. Neurol. Int. 2016. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 51.
Zheng X. et al. Microvascular Decompression Alone without Rhizotomy Is an Effective Way of Treating Glossopharyngeal Neuralgia: Clinical Analysis of 46 Cases // Stereotact. Funct. Neurosurg. 2020. Vol. 98, № 2. P. 129–135.
Siempis T. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for idiopathic glossopharyngeal neuralgia: A systematic review // World Neurosurg. X. 2024. Vol. 22. P. 100325.
Ma Y. et al. Neurosurgical treatment of glossopharyngeal neuralgia: analysis of 103 cases // J. Neurosurg. 2016. Vol. 124, № 4. P. 1088–1092.
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Neuropsychological Principles of Rehabilitation Training in the Therapy of Patients with Facial Nerve Palsy // Russ. Sklifosovsky J. “Emergency Med. Care.” 2022. Vol. 11, № 3. P. 457–463.
Nakano H. et al. Physical therapy for peripheral facial palsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis // Auris Nasus Larynx. 2024. Vol. 51, № 1. P. 154–160.
Khan A.J. et al. Physical therapy for facial nerve paralysis (Bell’s palsy): An updated and extended systematic review of the evidence for facial exercise therapy // Clin. Rehabil. 2022. Vol. 36, № 11. P. 1424–1449.
Di Stadio A. et al. Facial taping as biofeedback to improve the outcomes of physical rehab in Bell’s palsy: preliminary results of a randomized case–control study // Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2021. Vol. 278, № 5. P. 1693–1698.
VanSwearingen J.M., Brach J.S. Validation of a Treatment-Based Classification System for Individuals With Facial Neuromotor Disorders // Phys. Ther. 1998. Vol. 78, № 7. P. 678–689.
Lindsay R.W., Robinson M., Hadlock T.A. Comprehensive Facial Rehabilitation Improves Function in People With Facial Paralysis: A 5-Year Experience at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary // Phys. Ther. 2010. Vol. 90, № 3. P. 391–397.
Kim J.-H. et al. The Effects of Symmetrical Self-performed Facial Muscle Exercises on the Neuromuscular Facilitation of Patients with Facial Palsy // J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2011. Vol. 23, № 4. P. 543–547.
Castaldo M. et al. The Use of Mirror Therapy in Peripheral Seventh Nerve Palsy: A Systematic Review // Brain Sci. 2024. Vol. 14, № 6. P. 530.
Volk G.F. et al. Effect of an Intensified Combined Electromyography and Visual Feedback Training on Facial Grading in Patients With Post-paralytic Facial Synkinesis // Front. Rehabil. Sci. 2021. Vol. 2.
Santiago S. et al. Effectiveness of novel facial stretching with structured exercise versus conventional exercise for Bell’s palsy: a single-blinded randomized clinical trial // Sci. Rep. 2024. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 13266.
MORISHIMA N. et al. Effect of muscle strengthening on peripheral facial palsy: A randomized controlled trial // Phys. Ther. Res. 2020. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 59–65.
Dimitrova A., Murchison C., Oken B. Acupuncture for the Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2017. Vol. 23, № 3. P. 164–179.
Zhang R. et al. Compare the efficacy of acupuncture with drugs in the treatment of Bell’s palsy // Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. Vol. 98, № 19. P. e15566.
Li P., Qiu T., Qin C. Efficacy of Acupuncture for Bell’s Palsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials // PLoS One. 2015. Vol. 10, № 5. P. e0121880.
Zou Z. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture and Moxibustion in Acute Phase and Non-acute Phase of Bell’s Palsy: a meta-analysis. // Neuro Endocrinol. Lett. 2021. Vol. 42, № 7. P. 438–445.
van Landingham S.W., Diels J., Lucarelli M.J. Physical therapy for facial nerve palsy // Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2018. Vol. 29, № 5. P. 469–475.
Holland N.J., Bernstein J.M., Hamilton J.W. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for Bell’s palsy // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012. Vol. 2016, № 7.
Racic G. et al. Hyperbaric oxygen as a therapy of Bell’s palsy. // Undersea Hyperb. Med. 1997. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 35–38.
Ordahan B., Karahan A. yavuz. Role of low-level laser therapy added to facial expression exercises in patients with idiopathic facial (Bell’s) palsy // Lasers Med. Sci. 2017. Vol. 32, № 4. P. 931–936.
Alayat M.S.M., Elsodany A.M., El Fiky A.A.R. Efficacy of high and low level laser therapy in the treatment of Bell’s palsy: A randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial // Lasers Med. Sci. 2014. Vol. 29, № 1. P. 335–342.
Ton G. et al. Effects of Laser Acupuncture Therapy for Patients With Inadequate Recovery From Bell’s Palsy: Preliminary Results From Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study // J. Lasers Med. Sci. 2021. Vol. 12, № 1. P. e70–e70.
Ferrari M. et al. Oxford Textbook of Headache Syndromes. Oxford University Press, 2020.
Zavaliy L.B. Patient information leaflet for facial nerve neuropathy // Nervnye Bolezni. 2024. Vol. 2. P. 68–74.
Bouhassira D. et al. Development and validation of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory // Pain. 2004. Vol. 108, № 3. P. 248–257.
Freynhagen R. et al. pain DETECT : a new screening questionnaire to identify neuropathic components in patients with back pain // Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2006. Vol. 22, № 10. P. 1911–1920.
Bennett M. The LANSS Pain Scale: the Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs // Pain. 2001. Vol. 92, № 1. P. 147–157.
Yusupova D.G. et al. Validation of the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS) scale in Russia // Nervno-myshechnye bolezni. 2018. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 43–50.
Ross B.G., Fradet G., Nedzelski J.M. Development of a Sensitive Clinical Facial Grading System // Otolaryngol. Neck Surg. 1996. Vol. 114, № 3. P. 380–386.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Asratyan Sarkis Albertovich, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Neurosurgeon, Deputy Chief Physician for Surgical Care, City Clinical Hospital named after V.M. Buyanov of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Volkanevsky Alexey Valerievich, Anesthesiologist-Resuscitologist, Regional Perinatal Center of the Yaroslavl Region.
Genov Pavel Gennadievich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department for the Treatment of Patients with Chronic Pain Syndromes, Anesthesiologist-Resuscitologist, City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department. President of the Interventional Pain Management Association (IPMA), Member of the Pain Treatment Committee of the Federation of Anesthesiologists and Resuscitologists,
Gekht Alla Borisovna, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor, Director of the Scientific and Practical Psychoneurological Center named after Z.P. Solovyov of the Moscow Healthcare Department. Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Academic Secretary of the All-Russian Society of Neurologists.
Glebov Maxim Vladimirovich, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Day Hospital, Neurologist, City Clinical Hospital named after V.M. Buyanov of the Moscow Healthcare Department. Secretary of the Interventional Pain Management Association (IPMA).
Grin Andrey Anatolyevich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Scientific Department of Emergency Neurosurgery, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Professor at the Department of Fundamental Neurosurgery, Faculty of Additional Professional Education, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University.
Dzafarov Vijay Maisovich, Neurosurgeon, Federal Center for Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia.
Evdokimova Olga Liverievna, Radiologist, Head of the Radiosurgery Center Department, Junior Researcher at the Department of Emergency Neurosurgery, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Lesya B. Zavaliy, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Research Department of Emergency Neurology and Restorative Treatment, neurologist at the N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Kalantarova Marina Vitalievna, Medical Psychologist, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Senior Lecturer, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education.
Kirillova Elizaveta Pavlovna, Neurologist, City Clinical Hospital named after V.M. Buyanov of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Krylov Vladimir Viktorovich – Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Fundamental Neurosurgery, Faculty of Additional Professional Education, Institute of Continuing Professional Education, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief Researcher, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department. Chief freelance neurosurgeon of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Kulakov Anatoly Alekseevich, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Scientific Advisor, National Medical Research Center for Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health. Honored Worker of Science of the Russian Federation. Chief freelance maxillofacial surgeon of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Natalya Yu. Kutrovskaya, Candidate of Medical Sciences, ophthalmologist, associate professor at the Department of Ophthalmology, Russian University of Medicine of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Makashova Elizaveta Sergeevna, Neurologist, Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center of the Moscow Healthcare Department, National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Martynov Mikhail Yuryevich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor at the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Faculty of General Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Head of Administration, National Medical Research Center for Neurology. Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation.
Petrikov Sergey Sergeevich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Polunina Natalia Alekseevna, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Fundamental Neurosurgery, Faculty of Additional Professional Education, Institute of Continuing Professional Education, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Senior Researcher at the Neurosurgical Department, Neurosurgeon, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Ramazanov Ganipa Ramazanovich, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Deputy Director – Head of the Regional Vascular Center, Head of the Scientific Department of Emergency Neurology and Restorative Treatment, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Rakhmanina Anastasia Alekseevna, Researcher, Senior Medical Psychologist at the Department of Medical Psychology, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Rozhnova Elizaveta Nikolaevna, Junior Researcher at the Department of Emergency Neurosurgery, Neurologist, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Salikov Alexander Viktorovich, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Surgeon, Chief Physician, City Clinical Hospital named after V.M. Buyanov of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Salikhov Kamil Salamovich, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Scientific and Methodological Department of the Scientific and Organizational Direction, Maxillofacial Surgeon, Plastic Surgeon, National Medical Research Center for Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Sinkin Mikhail Vladimirovich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher, Neurologist, Functional Diagnostics Physician, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Seliverstova Ekaterina Gennadievna, Junior Researcher, Neurologist, Functional Diagnostics Physician, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Talypov Alexander Ernestovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher at the Department of Emergency Neurosurgery, Neurosurgeon, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Kholmogorova Alla Borisovna – Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, Leading Researcher, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Sharinova Irina Anatolyevna, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Neurologist at the Department for the Treatment of Patients with Chronic Pain Syndromes, City Clinical Hospital No. 52 of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Shamalov Nikolay Anatolyevich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Director of the Institute of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke, Federal Center for Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia. Chief freelance neurologist of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Conflict of interest: none.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
neurologist;
otorhinolaryngologist;
functional diagnostics physician;
radiologist;
neurosurgeon;
maxillofacial surgeon;
ophthalmologist;
infectious disease physician;
medical rehabilitation physician;
general practitioner (family physician);
internist;
district general practitioner;
admitting department physician;
Table 1. Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Scale for grading levels of evidence certainty (LEC) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Scale for grading grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.
The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Federal Law No. 323-FZ of November 21, 2011 (as amended on July 2, 2021) "On the Fundamentals of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation" (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2011, No. 48, Art. 6724) (with amendments and additions, effective from October 1, 2021) (https://roszdravnadzor.gov.ru/documents/100)
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 203n dated May 10, 2017, "On Approval of Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Medical Care"; (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of Russia on May 17, 2017, No. 46740); (http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201705170016?rangeSize=1);
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 103n dated February 28, 2019, "On Approval of the Procedure and Deadlines for the Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Their Revision, Standard Template of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Requirements for Their Structure, Composition and Scientific Validity of Information Included in Clinical Practice Guidelines."
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) (https://mkb-10.com/);
State Register of Medicines (http://www.grls.rosminzdrav.ru/grls.aspx);
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 804n dated October 13, 2017, "On Approval of the Nomenclature of Medical Services", registered with the Ministry of Justice on November 7, 2017, registration No. 48808 (as amended on March 24, 2020)
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms
Appendix B1
Management algorithm for a patient presenting with facial pain and typical triggers

Appendix B2
Algorithm for identifying atypical facial pain in a patient

Appendix B3
Management algorithm for a patient presenting with pain in the root of the tongue, tonsils, pharynx, or soft palate

Appendix B4
Differential diagnosis of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) [480]
Cluster headache | Paroxysmal hemicrania | SUNCT / SUNA | Hemicrania continua | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | 3M:1F | M | 1.5M:1F | 1M:1.6F |
Pain intensity | Very severe | Very severe | Severe | Moderate to very severe |
Attack characteristics | ||||
Frequency per day | 1-8 | 1-40 | 6-100 | - |
Duration (min.) | 30-180 | 2-50 | 1-5 | prolonged |
Agitation, restlessness | 90% | 80% | 65% | 69% |
Circadian rhythm | + | - | - | - |
Episodic to chronic ratio | 90:10 | 35:65 | 10:90 | 18:82 |
Triggers | ||||
Alcohol | +++ | + | - / + | + |
Skin touch | - | - | + | - |
Treatment response | ||||
Oxygen | + | - | - | - |
Sumatriptan | 90% | 20% | <10% | - |
Indometacin | - | + | - | + |
Migraine-associated attack features | ||||
Nausea | 50% | 40% | 25% | |
Photo- / phonophobia | 65 % | 65% | 25% | 80% |
Appendix B5

Appendix B6
Management algorithm for a patient with facial neuropathy

Appendix B7
Management algorithm for a patient with lagophthalmos according to its severity [102]
Grade | Palpebral fissure width upon eyelid closure | → Upper eyelid | → Lower eyelid | Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | Normal eyelid function | Observation | ||
0 | Normal eyelid function + dry eye | Daytime: artificial tears; Nighttime: dexpanthenol | ||
I – Mild | 0.5–3.0 mm | cornea completely covered by the upper eyelid | laxity | |
II – Moderate | 3.5–5.0 mm | lower sector of the cornea not covered by the upper eyelid | scleral show without lower eyelid ectropion | See above + Daytime: taping the eyelid for lift; Nighttime: eye patching; Exercise therapy complex; Scheduled ophthalmologist consultation |
III – Pronounced | 5.5–7.0 mm | lower 1/3 of the cornea not covered by the upper eyelid | ectropion without eversion of the lower lacrimal punctum | |
IV – Severe | ≥7.5 mm | lower 1/2 of the cornea not covered by the upper eyelid | pronounced ectropion with eversion of the lacrimal punctum | |
Complications | Redness | Emergency ophthalmologist consultation | ||
Injury | ||||
Appendix B8.
Algorithm for selecting a surgical treatment method for a patient with facial nerve injury depending on severity and disease duration3
Appendix B9.
Algorithm for selecting a surgical treatment method for a patient depending on the level of facial nerve injury
Appendix B10
Management algorithm for a patient with hemifacial spasm

Appendix C. Patient Information
Appendix B1. Patient information leaflet for facial pain
The onset and intensification of pain are linked not only to neurological but also to psychological aspects. Various processes are constantly occurring in the body. Some sensations are interpreted by us as safe and tolerable (itching, mild muscle pain); we do not focus on them and continue our usual activities, while others may seem unfamiliar, causing anxiety and apprehension, which attracts our attention and intensifies their character.
Emotions (anxiety, anger, sadness) associated with the evaluation of bodily sensations can amplify pain. The intensity of physical pain (arising as a result of mechanical injury) depends on the attention directed toward it; therefore, it is important to perform exercises aimed at voluntary attention shifting and relaxation.
Perfectionism is the belief that an ideal is attainable and that any deviation from it is wrong or unpleasant. Perfectionists are more sensitive to pain because they are intolerant of any deviations from their habitual state of well-being, repeatedly checking their condition (whether their head hurts, what the sensation in the face is right now). Such repeated checks require shifting attention.

Exercise 1.
Sit up straight or lie on your back
Place your hand on your abdomen
Inhale deeply through your nose, while the hand on your abdomen should rise (chest moves slightly)
Exhale through your mouth
Try to focus on your breathing
If any thoughts come to mind, simply note them: "I was thinking about..." (this also applies to focusing on discomfort in the facial area)
Return to observing your breathing
Exercise 2.
Find 5 objects you haven't paid attention to before
Try to hear 4 sounds surrounding you
Feel 3 surfaces: what material is this? what does it feel like (hard, soft, cold, warm, smooth, textured)?
Sense 2 odors (you can smell an aroma that calms you down)
Taste 1 item: what does it taste like?
Exercise 3.
It is important to know how to distract yourself not only with techniques, but also with everyday activities
Check your daily schedule
Fill your free time with interesting activities
While completing the tasks, focus on the process of doing them rather than evaluating your work or your current sensations.
Appendix B2. Patient information leaflet for cluster headache
Cluster headache is characterized by periodic attacks of extremely intense headache, or clusters. The pain is unilateral, localized behind or around the eye, and can radiate to other parts of the face, head, and neck. Cluster headache attacks are accompanied by restlessness, unlike migraine attacks, which limit the patient's physical activity. Cluster headache is a rare type of headache accompanied by autonomic symptoms.
The following autonomic symptoms are common:
Lacrimation during the attack, eye redness.
Nasal discharge may also occur during the attack.
Facial and/or forehead sweating.
Change in facial skin color on the affected side.
Swelling around the eye on the affected side.
What is a cluster period?
A cluster period may begin at the same time of year and last for the same duration as before. For example, a cluster period may start every spring or autumn. For most people with cluster headaches, a cluster period lasts from a week to a year. After the cluster period, a remission period begins lasting three months or more, but no more than a year. Such a cluster headache is called episodic. If the cluster period lasts longer than a year, the cluster headache is called chronic.
When should you see a doctor?
cluster headache has appeared for the first time;
change in the nature of the pain.
You must seek medical attention immediately if you experience the following symptoms: sudden, thunderclap intense headache resembling a "blow to the head"; headache accompanied by fever, nausea, nuchal rigidity, seizures, limb weakness, speech disturbances; progressive headache following a head injury.
What are the causes of cluster headaches?
Experts do not fully understand what causes cluster headaches. A connection with the area of the brain responsible for the body's biological clock, known as the hypothalamus, is suspected.
What are the triggers for cluster headaches?
There are several triggers for cluster headaches. The most common of these is alcohol consumption. Other triggers may include weather changes and certain medications.
What are the risk factors for cluster headaches?
Male sex. Men suffer from cluster headaches more often than women.
Age. Most people who experience cluster headaches are between 20 and 50 years old. However, this condition can begin at any age. • Smoking. Many people with cluster headaches are smokers.
Alcohol consumption. If you have cluster headaches, drinking alcohol during a cluster period can increase the risk of an attack.
Hereditary factors. Having a close relative with cluster headaches increases the risk of developing cluster headaches.
Diagnosis of cluster headache
The diagnosis is based on the patient's complaints, the history of the disease's development, the frequency and nature of the headache, and additional symptoms accompanying the attack. For newly onset cluster headaches, the doctor may prescribe an MRI or CT scan of the brain.
What questions might the doctor ask during the appointment?
How severe is the headache?
When did the headache start?
What is the duration of the attack?
Where is the headache localized?
Do attacks occur at the same time of year?
What other symptoms occur during the headache attack (lacrimation, eye redness, facial redness, facial sweating, nasal discharge)?
What triggers the attack?
Is this pain experienced for the first time, or have similar attacks occurred previously?
Has a brain MRI or CT scan been performed previously?
What chronic conditions are present?
What medications are you taking?
Appendix B3. Patient information leaflet for facial nerve neuropathy
Facial expressions are provided by the movements of paired facial muscles, the contraction of which is possible only when an impulse is delivered to them via a pathway—the facial nerve (cranial nerve VII). The facial nerve emerges from the brain as a single trunk in the cerebellopontine angle region, then exits the cranial cavity below the auditory meatus, enters the parotid gland, and divides into 5 branches that go to a specific group of muscles. When the facial nerve is damaged, the impulse does not reach the muscle, and it loses its ability to contract. However, a lesion at the brainstem level causes muscle weakness on one half of the face, while a lesion at the level of individual branches affects specific muscles. In severe nerve damage, movements in the muscles are absent (facial muscle prosoplegia); in other cases, varying degrees of muscle weakness are observed (facial muscle prosoparesis). Facial nerve neuropathy (FNN) is characterized by acutely developed facial asymmetry due to unilateral muscle weakness [481].
Depending on the site of the lesion, motor disorders may be accompanied by symptoms such as dry eye or lacrimation, impaired taste on the anterior two-thirds of the tongue, dry mouth, and increased sensitivity to sounds (hyperacusis). On the day of onset or 1-2 days prior, pain in the retroauricular region may occur.
There are several red flag symptoms of FNN that require dynamic monitoring:
Lagophthalmos (incomplete eyelid closure) occurs due to weakness of the orbicularis oculi muscle (its contraction closes the eye), while the opposing force is preserved (the levator palpebrae superioris muscle, whose contraction opens the eye). Due to incomplete and infrequent eyelid closure, the distribution of tears over the eyeball is disrupted, and corneal dryness occurs. In addition, if the innervation of the lacrimal gland itself is impaired, dry eye is exacerbated.
Lagophthalmos may be due to upper eyelid dysfunction (Bell's sign) and/or lower eyelid dysfunction up to eversion (ectropion). In the absence of preventive measures, the patient experiences discomfort due to dry eye, and without proper and timely treatment, complications develop: keratitis, erosion, ulceration, corneal perforation, visual impairment, up to the loss of the eyeball.
If FNN did not develop as a result of trauma, the nerve spontaneously recovers within 2-3 weeks in the majority of patients; in remaining cases, severe motor disorders develop.
Unilateral muscle weakness provokes activation and increased tone of the muscles on the healthy side, leading to a shift in the midline of the face. Hypertonicity of the facial muscles on the healthy side develops as early as the 7th day of the disease. Overstretching of the weakened muscles on the affected side occurs, which hinders their recovery.
In the absence of muscle movement in cases of severe nerve damage, the muscle is immobilized and atrophies (its volume decreases), meaning that even when the delivery of impulses is restored, recovery is impossible.
When movements reappear in the muscles with increasing muscle strength, the tone of the muscles on the affected side of the face increases (thickening, muscle tension), including the development of a pain syndrome; if not treated in a timely manner, muscle contractures form. When movements recover on the affected side, the patient experiences a feeling of tension and tightness in the muscles. These sensations are associated with positive dynamics, but later the tension is replaced by muscular pain—dull, aching, worsening with emotional stress and exposure to cold.
In the period from 3 months from symptom onset up to a year, excessive activity of the recovering muscles appears—synkinesias—associated movements of muscles that should not contract together. For example, when puckering the lips, the palpebral fissure narrows; when squinting, the lower lip pulls upward, etc. Without treatment, synkinesias progress to the formation of post-paralytic hemispasm, when any facial movement causes muscle spasm in one half of the face.
Management of a patient with FNN includes an ALGORITHM of diagnostic and therapeutic measures, as well as early and continuous rehabilitation. The patient needs to know the algorithm and possess certain home rehabilitation skills.
Step 1. Determination of the clinical situation, scope of examination, and treatment options.
The main objectives of DIAGNOSIS in acutely developed FNN are: 1) establishing the cause of the disease and 2) determining the severity of FNN.
Establishing the cause of the disease.
There are 2 forms of facial nerve neuropathy (FNN): idiopathic (Bell's palsy, a diagnosis of exclusion) and symptomatic (nerve damage due to herpes infection, otitis media, trauma, a tumor of the nerve itself or an adjacent nerve, post-operative, etc.). To identify the cause, contrast-enhanced brain MRI is performed (administering a contrast agent helps detect a tumor), along with laboratory diagnostics (to identify an inflammatory process, metabolic disorders, and establish infection).

Determining the severity of FNN.
Clinical examination helps determine the level (trunk or its individual branches) and degree of nerve damage. The presence of even minimal motor activity in the muscle indicates the preservation of its function and a relatively favorable prognosis for recovery. The absence of movement in the muscle indicates the need for instrumental diagnostics – ENMG and EMG to identify patients with an unfavorable prognosis and refer them for surgical treatment. ENMG parameters objectively show the degree of nerve damage; the result is reliable if the study is performed no earlier than 8 days from the onset of symptoms.
Patients with no clinical improvement after 3 months of prosoplegia undergo dynamic ENMG. If parameters are unfavorable, ultrasound or MRI of the muscles with assessment of their volume is performed. A decrease in muscle volume on the affected side indicates the need to address surgical treatment as early as possible.
In long-standing FNN, an important task for both the patient and the physician is the timely identification of developing FNN complications (muscle hypertonicity, synkinesias) and monitoring the dynamics of lagophthalmos.
TREATMENT of a patient with FNN: conservative and surgical, determined by the cause and degree of nerve damage. In all cases, the patient undergoes early and continuous rehabilitation.
For idiopathic FNN, glucocorticosteroids and antiviral drugs are prescribed, optimally initiated within the first 3 days of symptom onset.
For symptomatic FNN, treatment depends on the cause (if nerve damage was caused by otitis media, antibacterial drugs are prescribed, etc.).
Step 2. What not to do with the face.
In patients with non-traumatic FNN, complete recovery of facial nerve function occurs in 70% of cases. Traditionally, patients are given recommendations on what to do in case of FNN. However, what NOT to do is of immense importance, as certain interventions improve the prognosis while others worsen it. In FNN, it is recommended to: refrain from rough massage, active facial expressions, and active physical therapy exercises with a maximum range of motion, as well as muscle electrical stimulation.
Step 3. Achieving facial symmetry.
When FNN develops, movements on the affected side are limited or completely absent. Muscle tone decreases, leading to stretching. The healthy side is hyperactive, which leads to an increase in its muscle tone and, accordingly, a shift of the facial midline towards the healthy side. From the first days of the disease, it is necessary to relax the muscles of the healthy side (physical therapy or botulinum toxin therapy), as well as to support the muscles of the affected side of the face with adhesive tape or kinesio tape to restore facial symmetry and prevent muscle overstretching.

Fig. 1. Restoration of facial symmetry: positioning therapy using adhesive tape or kinesio tape.
Step 4. Using a mirror.
Patients with FNN are advised to use visual feedback (a mirror) when performing exercises and in daily life. It is necessary to pay attention to one's reflection in the mirror more often, eat meals in front of the mirror, perform physical therapy exercises in front of the mirror, and monitor facial expressions during video calls in order to control facial symmetry and limit excessively active facial movements (do not smile too widely, do not frown heavily, etc.). From a neuropsychological perspective, using a mirror helps increase voluntary control over facial movements, forming a habit of keeping the face as symmetrical as possible, which significantly reduces the risk of complications.
Step 5. Therapeutic physical exercise.
Therapeutic physical exercise (physical therapy) refers to a variety of interventions that, depending on the clinical situation, can either promote recovery or hinder it. The standard physical therapy routine for independent home performance (home self-rehabilitation) depends on: 1) the severity of muscle paresis, 2) the presence of complications, 3) lagophthalmos.
ASSESSING THE SEVERITY OF PARESIS: plegia – absence of movement, paresis – limitation of movement, decrease in muscle strength.
In plegia (absence of movement), it is recommended to perform movement simulations (passive exercises using the hands), inparesis (decreased muscle strength) – passive and/or active exercise therapy (active exercises, voluntary independent movements without using the hands) with dosed symmetrical muscle contractions (adjusting the healthy side of the face to the affected one to achieve symmetry) in front of a mirror in order to increase the range of motion, strength, endurance, and speed characteristics. In all cases, it is necessary to exclude the maximum range of motion, perform exercises symmetrically and in front of a mirror
Before physical therapy, point self-massage is performed to improve blood supply to the muscles: "Visually determine points for self-massage on the face. Divide the forehead into 4 parts, each corresponding to an impact point; determine the massage lines: nose to ear, above the upper lip to ear, below the lower lip to ear, and apply point pressure along the points on these lines. Place your index fingers (or index + middle fingers) symmetrically on 2 sides. Along the described points (up to 15 on each side), apply moderate pressure with circular movements, 3-4 rotations at each point, slowly. In cases of more intense and rapid pressure, the muscle will tend to tense up instead—this effect must be avoided; decrease the speed and increase the depth of pressure. Sensations should be pleasant, without pain."
The frequency of performing the standard routine is at least 2 times a day, duration is 10-15 minutes.

Fig. 2. Point self-massage and passive therapeutic physical exercise (a patient uses their hands to imitate movements – raising eyebrows, frowning, baring teeth, smiling, puckering lips).
Thus, in the absence of movement, the patient supports the muscles of the affected side of the face with tape, then performs a set of exercises: point self-massage + passive physical therapy. If movement is present on the affected side, facial muscle taping is not performed, and the exercise routine includes point self-massage + active physical therapy.
Standard exercise routine for a patient with facial nerve neuropathy
Severity of paresis
Physical therapy routine
paresis
plegia
positioning therapy for the affected side using adhesive tape or kinesio tape (independent applications)
-
+
point self-massage symmetrically on both sides
+
+
passive movements symmetrically on both sides, imitating muscle contraction
+
+
active physical therapy with dosed symmetrical muscle contractions in front of a mirror to increase the range of motion, strength, endurance, and contraction speed characteristics
+
-
*or upon clinical improvement to paresis during the rehabilitation process*
The list of exercises for passive or active physical therapy is identical; the only difference is that the patient performs passive physical therapy using their hands, while active physical therapy involves voluntary movements without using the hands.
List of exercises
Raise your eyebrows up
Frown
Close your eyes
Bare your teeth
Close your lips and smile
Part your lips and smile
Pucker your lips
Show a sad smile
Lower your bottom lip, say: "E-E"
Lift your lower lip up
ASSESSING FOR COMPLICATIONS. The main complications of FNN are muscle hypertonicity and synkinesias; the method for correcting them is muscle relaxation through: a) physical therapy exercises (for the prevention of complications or mild complications); b) botulinum toxin therapy (for moderate or severe complications). In cases of hypertonicity of the muscles on the healthy side, exercises are performed only on the healthy side; for the affected side, on both sides.
Special physical techniques targeting muscle relaxation: "Visually determine lines on the face representing the projections of muscle arrangement: inner canthus of the eye to mouth corner, outer canthus of the eye to mouth corner, auricle to mouth corner, neck to mouth corner. Place your thumb (opposite to the side of stretching) inside the mouth, and place the remaining fingers outside. Along the described lines (4-5 of them), apply moderate pressure to stretch from the periphery to the center for at least 20 seconds along each line. In cases of more intense and rapid pressure, the muscle will tend to tense up instead—this effect must be avoided; decrease the speed."

LAGOPHTHALMOS. The exercise regimen for correcting lagophthalmos includes 2 exercises aimed at eliminating the muscular imbalance between the orbicularis oculi muscle and the levator palpebrae superioris muscle. The exercises should be performed at least 2 times a day, up to 8 times during the day (every 2 hours).
Exercise 1: stretching of the levator palpebrae superioris muscle. Technique: place the index fingers of your right and left hands in the center of the mobile part of the closed upper eyelid, one above the other, and apply light pressure to the eyelid for 20 seconds while stretching it – the upper finger upwards, the lower finger downwards, then slowly remove your fingers. Perform this exercise once.

Fig. 4. Exercise aimed at stretching the levator palpebrae superioris muscle.
Exercise 2: restoration of the balance between the orbicularis oculi muscle and the levator palpebrae superioris muscle. Technique: lower your head, close your eyes, place the index and middle fingers of the hand on the healthy side in the center of the mobile part of the upper eyelid with light pressure on it, then simultaneously perform a multi-component movement – raise your head and eyebrows upward, open the eyelid with your fingers, and look upward. Repeat this exercise up to 5 times per session.

Fig. 5. Exercise aimed at eliminating the imbalance between the orbicularis oculi muscle and the levator palpebrae superioris muscle.
In isolated lesions of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve with weakness of the depressor anguli oris muscle (DAOM), the aforementioned regimens are ineffective; exercises specifically targeting the DAOM should be performed. Basic rules: perform exercise therapy in front of a mirror, symmetrically, evaluating the affected and healthy sides; all movements must be pinpoint (not rubbing), metered, without using maximum force, and avoiding any reaction of associated muscle contractions in the upper third of the face. An exemplary exercise therapy routine for restoring the function of the depressor anguli oris muscle includes:
The patient first performs self-massage – general point self-massage (Fig. 6, 1a) at the indicated points by making 3–5 circular movements with the index and middle fingers applying moderate pressure; then local self-massage of the DAOM on the affected side (Fig. 6, 1b) by making 3–5 circular movements with the index and middle fingers at the indicated point with moderate pressure; and finally, displacing the lower lip downward with the index and middle fingers of the hand 20 times (Fig. 6, 1c).
Muscle stimulation: to do this, on the affected side, the patient pushes the lower lip downward with the index and middle fingers of the hand and pronounces the sound "ы-ы-ы" (Fig. 6, 1d). This complication helps increase the range of motion when muscle movement is present (facilitating muscle contraction). Next, the patient performs a pinching grip of the lip with the thumb and index fingers of the hand (Fig. 6, 1e) and continues to lower the lower lip downward while applying finger resistance against the movement. Also, in the second stage, the patient is asked to purse their lips into a pout ("tubes") and perform "rolling" of air in the mouth from left to right and vice versa (Fig. 6, 2a), and then grasp a medical spatula with the lips and hold it while moving the spatula in various directions – up, down, right, left, diagonally, pushing inward, etc. (Fig. 6, 2b).
Control of muscle contraction: purse the lips into a pout and move them right and left (teeth clenched); during the movement, pause every few millimeters and continue the stretching (5 steps) (Fig. 6, 3a); then stretch the lips to the sides (smile); during the movement, pause every few millimeters and continue the stretching (5 steps), and then return to the pout in the same stepwise manner (Fig. 6, 3b).

Fig. 6. Exercises for an isolated lesion of the marginal mandibular branch of the facial nerve.
During home self-rehabilitation, recovery dynamics must be monitored by a physician every two weeks. Home self-rehabilitation does not exclude exercise therapy sessions with a specialist. In addition to standard exercise therapy regimens, there are individually tailored exercises prescribed by a physician. For example, Kabat therapy for severe lesions, neuromuscular re-education for synkinesias, etc.
Step 6. Complications and monitoring of complication development.
The patient needs to know the main complications of facial neuropathy, their clinical manifestations, and methods for early detection.
Facial muscle hypertonicity of varying severity is observed in patients as early as the 7th day of the disease on the healthy side, and a year after the disease in cases of incomplete recovery of facial nerve function on one side – in 93.3% of cases. To timely detect muscle hypertonicity, the patient must monitor for the appearance of muscle thickening, tension, facial muscle pain, a feeling of tightness, or displacement of the facial midline.
Synkinesias of varying severity develop in patients with incomplete recovery following facial neuropathy within 3 to 9 months in 15–100% of cases. There are a number of tests that patients can perform independently at home to detect synkinesias.
Initiating movement
Synkinesia
pursing lips, puffing out cheeks, chewing
palpebral fissure narrows
blinking, calm eye closure, forceful closing (squinting)
forehead wrinkles
nose wrinkles
corner of the mouth pulls upward
upper lip twitches
ala nasi lifts upward and outward
neck tension leading to cord formation
auricle rises
unilateral hearing loss or tinnitus
raising eyebrows
nose wrinkles
corner of the mouth pulls upward
full mouth opening or lateral jaw movement
palpebral fissure narrows (rare type of synkinesia)
chewing, lateral jaw movements
lacrimation from the eye on the affected side
key jingling, trumpet sound, clapping
contractions of facial muscles
occurring during menstruation after prior facial neuropathy
chronic retroauricular pain
Certain factors can accelerate the muscle strength recovery process but increase the risk of developing complications (active exercise therapy at maximum range of motion, electrical stimulation). There must be a balance between the desire to accelerate recovery and reducing the risk of complications.
Lagophthalmos in patients with facial neuropathy occurs with a frequency of about 70%; the symptom regresses slowly, therefore, from the first days of the disease, standard measures for preventing the development of complications must be carried out continuously and for a long time.
In uncomplicated lagophthalmos (the eyeball is white and painless), the patient instills artificial tear drops into the affected eye throughout the day: if preservative-free – every 2 hours, and if the product contains preservatives – no more than 4 times a day; at night, dexpanthenol is applied.
During the day, if there is a positional abnormality predominantly of the upper eyelid, a patch / kinesio tape is applied to it to weigh down the eyelid and narrow the palpebral fissure. If there is a positional abnormality predominantly of the lower eyelid (presence of ectropion), a "lifting" of the lower eyelid is performed using a patch / kinesio tape. If the palpebral fissure remains unclosed by more than 4 mm, to avoid mechanical eye damage before sleep, eyelid fixation with a patch / kinesio tape is applied ( nocturnal eye occlusion).
A planned consultation with an ophthalmologist is necessary for all patients. Emergency ophthalmologist consultation is required for: redness, burning, corneal changes, decreased visual acuity, pain. Lagophthalmos complications progress over several days, at which point surgery – eyelid suturing (tarsorrhaphy) – will be performed. In cases of severe or complicated ectropion, cantoplasty provides a good aesthetic and functional effect.

Fig. 7. Technique of applying a patch / kinesio tape to patients with paralytic lagophthalmos: A – during the day, B – at night.
Botulinum therapy
Botulinum toxin is a substance injected into a muscle to induce its local relaxation.
In the acute period of facial neuropathy, botulinum toxin injections are administered into the muscles of the healthy half of the face in cases of developing muscle hypertonicity, which leads to a shift in the facial midline and worsens the prognosis for functional recovery, or when there is a high risk of its development.
In the chronic period of facial neuropathy, botulinum toxin injections are performed on the affected side to treat muscle hypertonicity and synkinesias (post-paralytic hemispasm); the drug is injected into both the affected and healthy sides to achieve facial symmetry.
The drug begins to take effect on days 3–4 after injection, with the full clinical effect achieved on days 10–14. It must be remembered that along with decreased muscle tone, muscle strength also decreases; therefore, the physician individually selects the dose so that while reducing the severity of complications, facial muscle weakness does not cause significant discomfort to the patient. On average, the interval between injections is 5 months. Complications of injections may include hematoma, excessive muscle weakness, or weakness of an adjacent muscle, clinically manifested as double vision or speech impairment. For this reason, the procedure must be performed by a neurologist. Botulinum therapy is one of the methods of complex rehabilitation.
What surgical treatment methods exist for facial nerve neuropathy?
Surgical treatments can be divided into 2 groups:
1) aimed at eliminating the cause of the disease (performed as early as possible);
2) aimed at improving the outcome (performed in severe nerve damage in the absence of recovery).

Elimination of the cause of the disease
In patients with idiopathic facial neuropathy with severe nerve damage established clinically and confirmed by ENMG and EMG, facial nerve decompression (release) in the temporal bone canal is performed.
In patients with symptomatic facial neuropathy, surgery is performed depending on the cause. For a tumor – tumor removal. For purulent otitis media – ENT surgery.
Improving the outcome of the disease
Symptomatic surgeries aimed at improving the outcome of facial neuropathy are performed on average 6 months after the onset of symptoms in patients with severe facial neuropathy with no recovery. Surgical treatment can be considered as early as 3 months from symptom onset if there is no positive trend, since preparation for surgery takes time. There is an exception: surgery is performed early if facial neuropathy developed due to traumatic injury, including intraoperatively (e.g., during brain tumor removal) and it is known that the nerve is transected.
The type of surgery mainly depends on the duration of the disease, the level of lesion, and the severity of the lesion. They are classified into:
reinnervation surgeries aimed at restoring impulse conduction along the nerve. This involves suturing the ends of the facial nerve, suturing other motor nerves of the face (masseter, hypoglossal) to the facial nerve, or suturing the facial nerve to the healthy side (cross-face nerve grafting). After such surgeries, swallowing and chewing are not significantly altered, but when the facial nerve is connected to the masseter nerve, a smile will appear only when clenching the teeth; when connected to the hypoglossal nerve, only when the tongue is pressed against the palate, etc. This feature must be taken into account during rehabilitation. Over time, the patient learns to control muscle movements and "retrains" them.
reconstructive and plastic surgeries aimed at improving facial symmetry when the disease duration is more than 1.5-2 years. This includes repositioning the patient's own muscle from a nearby area (masseter or temporalis muscle), microsurgical transplantation of muscles from other parts of the body (thigh, back) to the face, and suspension of tissues to the upper parts of the face (using fascial strips, threads).
lagophthalmos correction surgeries are performed for persistent lagophthalmos to restore eyelid closure. It is necessary to consider whether the position of the upper or lower eyelid is more impaired. If the position of the upper eyelid is impaired, it is weighted with a piece of cartilage (taken from the auricle), a gold weight, hyaluronic acid, or autologous fat. If the position of the lower eyelid is impaired, its tightening and/or reinforcement is performed (including using cartilage) [481].
Appendix B4. Patient information leaflet for hemifacial spasm
Human facial expressions are provided by the movements of 18-25 pairs of muscles, the contraction of which is possible only when an impulse is supplied to them via a conductor – the facial nerve (7th cranial nerve). The facial nerve emerges from the cranial cavity as a single trunk just below the ear canal, passes through the parotid salivary gland, and splits into 5 branches that go to a specific group of muscles. When the facial nerve is irritated, an excessive impulse is supplied to the muscle, it becomes hyperactive and begins to contract involuntarily. Since the facial nerve innervates the muscles of one half of the face, the spasm is unilateral.
Hemifacial spasm is clinically manifested by chronic paroxysmal painless involuntary unilateral tonic, clonic, or tonic-clonic contractions of a group of facial muscles, including at rest and at night. In the typical course of the disease, the spasm begins in the eye area and spreads to half of the face; in the atypical course, from the cheek area. Muscle spasm may be accompanied by clicks in the ear or even pain with characteristics of trigeminal neuralgia. In addition, over time, weakness of the facial muscles may appear on the paretic side. The main diagnostic task is to identify the cause of the spasm, i.e., to establish what exactly is irritating the nerve.
Primary HFS is when one of the blood vessels irritates the nerve root (at its exit from the brain).
Secondary (symptomatic) HFS occurs if the nerve is irritated by any other formation – a tumor of the cerebellopontine angle or parotid gland, vascular anomalies, etc.
If a complete diagnosis has been made, but HFS is not established, it is called idiopathic (due to lower motor neuron lesion of the facial nerve).
Diagnostics
Diagnosis of HFS primarily includes MRI in special modes to detect neurovascular conflict. If absent, contrast-enhanced brain MRI must be performed to identify other alternative causes, most commonly space-occupying lesions. Laboratory diagnostics help indirectly establish the etiology of the process – to detect inflammation or metabolic disorders.
Treatment
If a neurovascular conflict is detected, surgical treatment is performed – their separation; if a space-occupying lesion is detected – its removal, etc.
In cases where surgical treatment is contraindicated, the patient refuses it, or the cause of HFS is not established, conservative treatment is performed. Botulinum therapy is the method of choice.
In cases of primary or idiopathic HFS, when surgical treatment is not indicated, contraindicated, or the patient refuses it, symptoms persist after treatment, and botulinum therapy and other medical treatment are ineffective – radiosurgical treatment may be recommended to the patient.
Appendix B5. Patient information leaflet for facial myokymia
Practically everyone's eye has "twitching" at least once in their life.
Facial myokymia is clinically manifested by spontaneous, periodically occurring and lasting from several seconds to several hours, less often – up to several weeks, unilateral, self-limiting, low-amplitude, pulsating twitches in one of the facial muscles (more often the lower portion of the palpebral part of the orbicularis oculi muscle), which are more obvious to the patient than to others, may increase with voluntary movements, but are not initiated by them.
In most cases, facial myokymia is primary, i.e., an independent benign condition caused by physical or emotional overstrain, caffeine use, prolonged computer use, or improperly prescribed glasses. In such cases, it resolves spontaneously after the elimination of the unfavorable factor. However, facial myokymia can be secondary (symptomatic), i.e., a side effect of medications (e.g., topiramate, gabapentin), as well as a sign of the onset of such diseases as multiple sclerosis, a tumor, or an autoimmune disease.
"Red flags" in facial myokymia:
twitches also in other facial muscles and/or body parts,
bilateral process,
eye opens with difficulty,
drooping eyelid,
redness or swelling of the eyelid,
pain,
symptoms do not resolve within several weeks.
presence of other neurological symptoms.
Diagnostics
Diagnosis is made clinically based on complaints, medical history, and examination. However, with a prolonged course of the disease and/or the presence of red flags, laboratory and instrumental diagnostics are required. Contrast-enhanced brain MRI is the method of choice. Laboratory diagnostics help indirectly establish the etiology of the process – to detect inflammation or metabolic disorders.
Treatment
As a rule, drug treatment is not required. Work and rest regimen, elimination of adverse factors.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1
Russian title: Diagnostic questionnaire for neuropathic pain.
Original title: Neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire, DN4 [482]
Source (official developer website, validation publication):
Type: questionnaire.
Purpose: intended for physicians of clinical specialties who are not neurologists
Contents:
Please fill out this questionnaire by checking one answer for each item in the 4 questions below
Patient interview | ||
|---|---|---|
Question 1: Does the pain experienced by the patient correspond to one or more of the following definitions? | ||
Yes | No | |
1. Burning | ||
2. Painful cold | ||
3. Electric shocks | ||
Question 2: Is the pain accompanied by one or more of the following symptoms in its localization area? | ||
Yes | No | |
4. Tingling | ||
5. Pins and needles | ||
6. Numbness | ||
7. Itching | ||
Physical examination of the patient | ||
Question 3: Is the pain localized in the same area where examination reveals one or both of the following symptoms: | ||
Yes | No | |
8. Hypoesthesia to touch | ||
9. Hypoesthesia to pinprick | ||
Question 4: Can the pain be triggered or increased in the area of its localization? | ||
Yes | No | |
10. By brushing over this area | ||
Key (interpretation): if the total score is ≥ 4, the patient has a high probability of neuropathic pain
Notes: the questionnaire makes it possible to detect the presence of neuropathic pain with a reliability of more than 80%
Appendix G2
Russian title: painDETECT questionnaire
Original title (if any): questionnaire PainDETECT [483]
Source (official developer website, validation publication):
Type: questionnaire.
Purpose: assessment of the pain course character and diagnosis of the neuropathic pain component
Contents:
The questionnaire is designed to be filled out by a physician and combines a pain distribution diagram with a VAS scale and a questionnaire aimed at identifying spontaneous and evoked symptoms of neuropathic pain. The diagram is also used to assess the nature of the pain course: constant, paroxysmal, constant with exacerbations, etc. The questionnaire most comprehensively reflects all possible pain parameters and provides a very visual way to track the pain syndrome dynamics over time.


Key (interpretation): a score of 19 points or higher indicates the presence of a pronounced neuropathic component.
Appendix G3
Russian name: Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs
Original name (if applicable): Leeds assessment of neuropathic symptoms and signs, LANSS [484,485]
Source (official developer website, publication with
validation):
Type: questionnaire.
Purpose: identification and assessment of neuropathic pain
Content (template):
A. PAIN ASSESSMENT (questionnaire)
Think about what your pain sensations have been like over the past week.
Please select the statements that best describe your pain.
Does your pain manifest as strange, unpleasant sensations on the skin? Can these sensations be compared to tingling?
a) NO - The pain I experience cannot be described in this way (0)
b) YES - I am quite often bothered by such sensations (5)
Does the skin in the pain localization area change? Does it become spotted? Does it look red?
a) NO - Pain does not affect the appearance of the skin (0)
b) YES - Where I am bothered by pain, the appearance of the skin differs from normal (5)
Is sensitivity to touch increased in the affected skin area? Can it be said that light stroking of the skin or contact with clothing causes unpleasant or painful sensations?
a) NO - Sensitivity is unchanged in the affected skin area (0)
b) YES - Skin sensitivity is increased in the affected skin area (3)
4. Does the pain appear suddenly, at rest, for no apparent reason? Can it be described as throbbing, bursting, or resembling an electric shock?
a) NO - My sensations cannot be described in this way (0)
b) YES - I am quite often bothered by such sensations (2)
5. Does the skin temperature in the affected area differ from the temperature of the rest of the skin surface? Can such sensations be described as burning or heat?
a) NO - I am not bothered by such sensations (0)
b) YES - I am quite often bothered by such sensations (1)
B. SENSITIVITY ASSESSMENT
Superficial sensitivity is examined for the presence of allodynia and changes in the pain sensitivity threshold (using a needle prick) in the affected skin area compared to the corresponding area on the opposite body side or another skin area.
1. Allodynia
Assess the sensitivity to light cotton touch in the affected and healthy skin areas. The presence of allodynia can be stated if touching the affected skin area causes pain or other unpleasant sensations (tingling, nausea), while performing the test on a healthy skin area does not cause such sensations.
a) NO - Sensitivity is the same in both areas (0)
b) YES - Allodynia only in the affected area (5)
2. Change in the pain sensitivity threshold
Determine the pain sensitivity threshold in healthy and affected skin areas using a 23-gauge needle inserted inside a 2 ml syringe barrel.
If a prick in the healthy area feels like a sharp touch, while in the affected area it feels different — for example, the touch is not felt at all, feels like a blunt touch (increased pain sensitivity threshold) or is very painful (decreased pain sensitivity threshold) — then a change in the pain sensitivity threshold can be stated.
If the prick is not felt anywhere, attach the needle to the syringe to increase the weight and repeat the test.
a) NO - Sensations from the needle prick are the same in both areas (0)
b) YES - Altered needle prick sensation in the affected area (3)
SCORING:
To obtain the total sum, the values of the pain and sensitivity assessment parameters are added up.
TOTAL SCORE: ______________ (maximum 24 points)
Key (interpretation): if the sum is <12, the neuropathic mechanism of pain generation is unlikely. If the sum is ≥ 12, the neuropathic mechanism of pain generation is probable.
Notes: The scale helps identify dysfunction of nerves responsible for pain, which is important for determining further treatment tactics.
Appendix G4
Russian name: House-Brackmann Scale*.
Original name: House-Brackmann Grading System [116].
Type: rating scale.
Purpose: determining the degree of facial nerve damage.
Content: The table is designed for physician assessment of facial muscle function at rest and during movement across three areas: forehead, eye, and mouth.
* Validation of the House-Brackmann Scale was performed at the Research Center of Neurology
Key (interpretation): the combination of symptoms indicates the severity of facial nerve neuropathy.
Appendix G5
Russian name: Sunnybrook Facial Grading System*.
Original name: The Sunnybrook Facial Grading System [486].
Type: rating scale.
Purpose: determining the degree of facial nerve damage.
Content: The table is designed for physician assessment of facial muscle function at rest and during movement across five areas, as well as for assessing the presence of synkinesias.

Key (interpretation): the combination of symptoms indicates the severity of facial nerve neuropathy, the severity of primary and secondary motor disorders.