List of Abbreviations
BF – Biofeedback
VAS – visual analogue scale
GP – general practitioner
IV – intravenous
GB – headache
GBN – tension-type headache
DPM – pericranial muscle dysfunction
DCE – dyscirculatory encephalopathy
VLEL – vital and essential drugs
CGRP – calcitonin gene-related peptide
KN – comorbid disorders
LIGB – medication-induced (overuse) headache
M – migraine
MA – migraine with aura
MwoA – migraine without aura
mAb – monoclonal antibody
ICD-10 – International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision
ICHD-3 – International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition
MRI – magnetic resonance imaging
SM – status migrainosus
MTS – muscle-tonic syndrome
MFS – myofascial syndrome
NSAIDs – non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs
NS – neurostimulation
PS – peripheral sensitization
CSD – cortical spreading depression
TVS – trigeminovascular system
Dura – dura mater
TCA – tricyclic antidepressants
CDU – color duplex ultrasonography
HGBN – chronic tension-type headache
HM – chronic migraine
CNS – central nervous system
CS – central sensitization
EGBN – episodic tension-type headache
CGRP – Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide – calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)
PREEMPT – Phase III REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy.
Terms and Definitions
Causative drugs (abused drugs) – medicications that, when used excessively, can lead to medication-overuse headache (MOH) (all classes of analgesics).
Secondary headaches – headaches that are a symptom of another (symptomatic) disorder, occurring de novo in close temporal relation to another causative disorder which, according to scientific evidence, is capable of causing headache.
Tension-type headache (TTH) – one of the most common forms of primary headache, manifesting as pain episodes lasting from 30 minutes to several days.
Pericranial muscle dysfunction (PMD) – painful tension of the muscles of the head, face, and neck.
Inhibitory antinociceptive mechanisms – the descending pain-modulating or antinociceptive control system.
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) – the main mediator of pain impulse transmission and a direct participant in migraine pathogenesis.
Comorbid disorders (CD) – one or more pathological conditions observed in a single patient, etiopathogenetically related or coinciding in time of onset regardless of the activity of each.
Medication-overuse headache (MOH) – a clinical subtype of secondary chronic headache developing in patients with primary cephalalgias due to the excessive use of acute headache medications.
Medication overuse – the excessive use of any pain-relieving medications for acute headache treatment.
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting CGRP or its receptor – the first class of drugs specifically developed for targeted (pathogenetically grounded) migraine prevention.
Primary headaches – idiopathic (benign) cephalalgias not associated with organic brain pathology, cerebral vascular disorders, other head and neck structures, or systemic diseases.
Peripheral sensitization (PS) – an increased response of excited nociceptive neurons of the peripheral nervous system to normal and/or subthreshold stimulation.
Targeted migraine preventive therapy – therapy with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) directed against the primary migraine mediator CGRP or its receptor, acting on the core pathogenetic mechanism of migraine.
Migraine triggers – endogenous and exogenous factors capable of provoking a migraine attack.
Chronification factors – genetic, metabolic, environmental, behavioral, and/or psychological factors promoting an increase in headache frequency.
Migraine chronification – a gradual increase in the number of headache days per month.
Chronic migraine (CM) – headache occurring on ≥15 days per month for >3 months, with headache attacks exhibiting migraine features on at least 8 days per month.
Central sensitization (CS) – an enhancement of neural signaling within the CNS that leads to systemic hypersensitivity to pain. CS reflects hyperexcitability of pain-processing systems, reduced activity of descending pain-inhibitory pathways, and consequently a disruption of endogenous pain control.
Cephalalgia – headache (synonym).
Headache specialist – a neurologist specializing in the diagnosis and treatment of headaches.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Migraine is a primary headache disorder manifested by attacks of throbbing unilateral headache lasting 4–72 hours, accompanied by photophobia, phonophobia, nausea, and/or vomiting.
Migraine typically begins at a young age, before 20 years. In childhood, the condition is more common in boys; adult women are affected 2.5 to 3 times more often than men. At ages 35–45, the frequency and intensity of migraine attacks peak, whereas after 55–60 years the disease course softens or attacks cease completely. At the same time, some patients over 50 may retain typical migraine attacks and/or isolated migraine aura (late-life migraine accompaniments) [1–3].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Migraine is a chronic neurovascular disorder with a genetic predisposition. The core pathogenetic mechanism is the periodic development of perivascular neurogenic inflammation of cerebral vessels, primarily the meningeal vessels of the dura mater. Patients with migraines are known to exhibit increased excitability of the cerebral cortex and trigeminovascular system neurons [3, 4]. Upon exposure to endogenous and exogenous migraine triggers, the excitability of the trigeminal system, hypothalamus, cortex, and certain other brain structures increases, leading to activation of the trigeminal ganglion, the sensory spinal trigeminal nucleus, and trigeminal nerve fibers innervating the dural vessels – trigeminovascular fibers. Activation of the trigeminovascular system (TVS) is accompanied by the release of pain-inducing pro-inflammatory vasodilator peptides (primarily calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), as well as neurokinin A and substance P) from trigeminovascular terminals [3, 4]. Subsequent vasodilation and neurogenic inflammation activate pain receptors in the dural vessel walls. Pain impulses reach the sensory cerebral cortex, generating the sensation of throbbing headache. Persistent hyperexcitability of the TVS, central nociceptive structures, and exhaustion of the anti-nociceptive system gradually lead to permanent hypersensitivity (sensitization) of pain structures, which promotes more frequent headache attacks and ultimately drives M chronification [1–4].
The mechanism of migraine aura is associated with the generation and propagation of a wave of neuronal depolarization (excitation) spreading from the visual cortex to the somatosensory and frontotemporal brain regions – cortical spreading depression (CSD). The velocity and topography of CSD determine the rate, nature, and sequence of aura symptoms [1, 3].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
The prevalence of M in the general population of Europe and the USA averages 14% (17% among women and 8% among men) [1, 3, 5]. According to a population-based house-to-house survey conducted in 2009–2011 across 35 cities and 9 rural districts in Russia, the 1-year prevalence of M was 20.8%, which slightly exceeds the figures reported in most other countries [6]. According to another Russian study, the 1-year prevalence of M was 15.9% (M without aura 13.5%, M with aura 2.4%) [7].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
G43 – Migraine
G43.0 – Migraine without aura [common migraine]
G43.1 – Migraine with aura [classic migraine]
G43.2 – Status migrainosus
G43.3 – Complicated (including chronic) migraine
G43.8 – Other migraine (ophthalmoplegic, retinal)
G43.9 – Migraine, unspecified
G44.0 – Cluster headache syndrome
G44.1 – Vascular headache, not elsewhere classified
G44.4 – Drug-induced headache, not elsewhere classified
Comments: M can be combined with TTH (G43.0/1, G44.2). Frequent episodic and especially chronic migraine (CM) can be combined with medication-overuse headache (MOH, G44.4).
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
In accordance with the latest version of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3, 2018), M belongs to primary (benign) cephalalgias (Part I of ICHD-3), which are not associated with organic lesions of the brain, cerebral vessels, other structures located in the head and neck region, or systemic diseases (Tab. 1) [8].
Table 1. Table of Contents of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3, 2018) [8]
Part I. Primary headaches |
|---|
1 Migraine |
2 Tension-type headache (TTH) |
3 Cluster headache and other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias |
4 Other primary headache disorders |
Part II. Secondary headaches |
5 Headache attributed to head and/or neck trauma or injury |
6 Headache attributed to cranial or cervical vascular disorder |
7 Headache attributed to non-vascular intracranial disorder |
8 Headache attributed to a substance or its withdrawal (including MOH) |
9 Headache attributed to infection |
10 Headache attributed to disorder of homeostasis |
11 Headache or facial pain attributed to disorder of cranium, neck, eyes, ears, nose, sinuses, teeth, mouth or other facial or cranial structures |
12 Headache attributed to psychiatric disorder |
Part III. Painful cranial neuropathies and other facial pains |
13 Painful cranial neuropathies and other facial pains |
14 Other headache disorders |
According to ICHD-3, there are two main forms of M: migraine without aura (MO), which is the most frequent – up to 80% of cases, and migraine with aura (MA) – up to 20% of cases [1, 3]. The main clinical manifestation of MO is a headache attack; in MA, the pain phase of the attack is preceded by an aura stage. Other forms of MA are less common: migraine with brainstem aura (formerly "basilar-type M"), retinal migraine, and hemiplegic migraine.
The ICHD-3 separately defines chronic migraine (CM), complications of migraine, and episodic syndromes that may be associated with M (more common in childhood) [8]. If one of the diagnostic criteria is not met, a diagnosis of "Probable M" can be made (Tab. 2) [8].
Table 2. Classification of migraine (according to ICHD-3, 2018) [8]
1 Migraine |
|---|
1.1. Migraine without aura |
1.2. Migraine with aura |
1.2.1. Migraine with typical aura |
1.2.1.1. Typical aura with headache |
1.2.1.2. Typical aura without headache |
1.2.2. Migraine with brainstem aura |
1.2.3. Hemiplegic migraine |
1.2.3.1. Familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) |
1.2.3.1.1 Familial hemiplegic migraine type 1 |
1.2.3.1.2 Familial hemiplegic migraine type 2 |
1.2.3.1.3 Familial hemiplegic migraine type 3 |
1.2.3.1.4 Familial hemiplegic migraine with other loci mutations |
1.2.3.2. Sporadic hemiplegic migraine |
1.2.4. Retinal migraine |
1.3. Chronic migraine |
1.4. Complications of migraine |
1.4.1. Status migrainosus |
1.4.2. Persistent aura without infarction |
1.4.3. Migrainous infarction |
1.4.4. Migraine aura-triggered seizure |
1.5. Probable migraine |
1.5.1. Probable migraine without aura |
1.5.2. Probable migraine with aura |
1.6. Episodic syndromes that may be associated with migraine |
1.6.1. Recurrent gastrointestinal disturbance |
1.6.1.1. Cyclic vomiting syndrome |
1.6.1.2. Abdominal migraine |
1.6.2. Benign paroxysmal vertigo |
1.6.3. Benign paroxysmal torticollis |
Comments: episodic syndromes are more common in childhood and may precede the onset of typical migraine attacks without or with aura.
The Appendix to ICHD-3 also defines true menstrual migraine, in which M attacks occur exclusively during the perimenstrual period (2–3 days before and during the first 3 days of menstruation), and migraine associated with menstruation, in which headache attacks may also occur on other days of the month (i.e., triggers of M attacks include not only menstruation but other triggers as well) [8].
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
Migraine without aura (MO) manifests as recurring, generally stereotyped attacks of intense, usually unilateral, pulsating headache predominantly in the temporal, ocular, and parietal regions, though it often begins in the occipital region. The headache is frequently accompanied by nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia, and is aggravated by physical activity. The duration of an attack is from 4 hours to 3 days; the frequency of headache days in episodic M ranges from 1 day per year to 14 days per month (on average 2–4 headache days per month), and in CM it is 15 or more headache days per month [1, 9, 10].
In migraine with aura (MA), the headache phase is preceded by transient neurological symptoms. Migraine with typical aura is the most common, presenting with fully reversible visual, sensory, and/or speech symptoms, but without motor or brainstem deficits [11, 12]. In rare cases, headache does not develop after the aura – typical aura without headache. In migraine with brainstem aura, in addition to visual, sensory, and/or speech disturbances, two or more fully reversible brainstem symptoms occur: dysarthria, vertigo, tinnitus, hypacusis, diplopia, ataxia, or altered level of consciousness. Hemiplegic migraine, which is extremely rare and almost always hereditary, is characterized by fully reversible visual, sensory, and/or speech symptoms combined with motor deficits (hemiparesis or hemiplegia). Non-motor symptoms last for 5–60 minutes, and motor disorders last for up to 72 hours. In familial hemiplegic migraine, at least one first- or second-degree relative has or has had headache attacks meeting the criteria for hemiplegic migraine; sporadic hemiplegic migraine lacks this hereditary predisposition. In retinal migraine, the aura consists of fully reversible monocular positive and/or negative visual phenomena (scintillations, scotomas), the presence of which is confirmed by ophthalmological visual field examination during M attacks, and/or the patient can draw or describe the monocular visual field defect present at that time [9, 10].
An M attack can be triggered by various exogenous and endogenous factors. The most frequent migraine triggers include [2, 9, 10, 13]:
psychological factors: stress or relaxation after stress, anxiety or depressive disorders, fatigue;
weather changes;
hormonal factors: menstruation (perimenstrual "window"), ovulation, use of estrogen-containing hormone replacement therapy or oral contraceptives;
dietary factors: hunger, consumption of certain foods (cheese, chocolate, nuts, smoked foods, chicken liver, avocado, citrus fruits, or caffeine-containing products); alcohol consumption (especially red wine);
other factors: lack or excess of night sleep, stuffiness, aerobic physical exertion, visual stimuli (bright or flashing light), noise, staying at high altitudes.
Chronic migraine (CM) is a severe form characterized by a high frequency of headache days (15 or more per month), long duration, and high intensity of attacks, leading to maladaptation and a decreased quality of life in patients. CM is characterized by the following manifestations: the development of comorbid disorders, primarily psychiatric ones (depression, anxiety disorders), sleep disturbances, decreased efficacy of acute treatment medications, and a high risk of their overuse (medication overuse). The main modifiable factors of migraine chronification are emotional stress, depression, excessive intake of analgesic drugs, and caffeine [14 - 17].
CM and frequent episodic migraine are often combined with medication-overuse headache (MOH). In this case, the headache has a mixed character: migraine headaches are combined with tension-type-like cephalalgias presenting as a diffuse, monotonous, most commonly morning or nighttime pressing or constricting headache that increases in intensity as the effect of the previously taken analgesic medication wears off. Typical manifestations of long-standing MOH include nighttime intake of analgesic drugs, taking them at the stage of mild headache to prevent its intensification (prophylactic intake), as well as complaints of difficulty concentrating, impaired memory, and reduced work capacity. MOH generally improves after the withdrawal of the overused drug(s).
Complications of migraine include several conditions.
Migraine status is a typical debilitating migraine attack lasting more than 72 hours, during which remissions of up to 12 hours associated with sleep or medication effects are permitted.
Persistent aura without infarction refers to one or more aura symptoms lasting for more than one week, without radiographic evidence of brain infarction.
Migrainous infarction (stroke) is the combination of one or more migraine aura symptoms with ischemic brain injury confirmed by neuroimaging methods. True migrainous infarction occurs during a typical migraine attack with aura, with one or more aura symptoms lasting for more than 60 minutes. Brain infarctions that do not coincide in time with a migraine attack with aura cannot be classified as migrainous infarctions.
Migraine aura as a trigger for an epileptic seizure is an epileptic seizure occurring during a migraine with aura attack or within 1 hour after it.
Episodic syndromes that may be associated with migraine. These disorders occur predominantly in childhood and are significantly less common in adults.
Cyclic vomiting syndrome is characterized by episodically recurring attacks of severe nausea and vomiting, usually stereotyped for each patient and with a predictable start time; the attacks are accompanied by skin pallor and lethargy; symptoms resolve completely between attacks.
Abdominal migraine is an idiopathic disorder occurring predominantly in children, presenting as recurring episodes of moderate to severe abdominal pain (in the midline) lasting 2 - 72 hours; nausea and/or vomiting are typical; no headache occurs during these episodes. The patients' condition is normal between attacks. The vast majority of children with abdominal migraine later develop typical migraine headaches.
Benign paroxysmal vertigo – recurring brief attacks of vertigo in children that both start and resolve suddenly.
Benign paroxysmal torticollis is recurring episodes of head tilt to one side, possibly with a slight head rotation, which resolve spontaneously. This condition occurs in infants and young children, beginning within the first year of life. Older children may develop ataxia.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
It is recommended that all patients presenting with headache undergo clinical diagnosis of migraine based on the specific clinical manifestations of its individual forms and compliance with the diagnostic criteria of the latest version of the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-3) [8, 9, 18, 20]. Clinical diagnosis is carried out during the initial examination (consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.001) or a follow-up examination (consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.002), and includes taking the anamnesis and complaints in central nervous system and brain pathology (A01.23.001) and a physical examination (see section 2.2 for details).
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: ICHD-3, approved by the International Headache Society in 2018, is the primary diagnostic tool for any forms of headache and facial pain, including migraine variants. Tables 3a to 3c present the diagnostic criteria for migraine without aura, migraine with aura, and chronic migraine according to ICHD-3.
Diagnosis of migraine complications and episodic syndromes that may be associated with migraine is also carried out in accordance with the diagnostic criteria of ICHD-3 [8, 12].
Table 3a. Diagnostic criteria for migraine without aura (according to ICHD-3, 2018) [8]
A. At least 5 attacks fulfilling criteria B - D. |
|---|
B. Attack duration of 4 - 72 hours (untreated or unsuccessfully treated). |
C. Headache has at least 2 of the following four characteristics: |
1. unilateral location |
2. pulsating quality |
3. moderate or severe pain intensity |
4. aggravation by or causing avoidance of routine physical activity (e.g., walking or climbing stairs) |
D. Headache is accompanied by at least one of the following: |
1. nausea and/or vomiting |
2. photophobia and phonophobia |
E. Not better accounted for by another ICHD-3 diagnosis. |
It is recommended that all patients with migraine undergo clinical diagnosis of migraine aura in order to select further treatment tactics [9, 15]. Clinical diagnosis is carried out during the initial examination (consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.001) or a follow-up examination (consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.002), and includes taking the anamnesis and complaints in central nervous system and brain pathology (A01.23.001) and a physical examination (see section 2.2 for details).
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: if a migraine aura is identified, it is recommended to assign the appropriate diagnosis, such as "Migraine with typical aura" or "Migraine with brainstem aura" [8, 11, 12, 18 - 20]. Aura should not be confused with prodromal symptoms, which may occur several hours before the onset of a migraine attack: increased sensitivity to light, sound, and smells, appetite changes, thirst, emotional excitement, or, conversely, malaise, etc.
Table 3b. Diagnostic criteria for migraine with aura (according to ICHD-3, 2018) [8]
A. At least 2 attacks fulfilling criteria B and C |
|---|
B. One or more of the following fully reversible aura symptoms: |
1. visual |
2. sensory |
3. speech and/or language |
4. motor |
5. brainstem |
6. retinal |
C. At least three of the following six characteristics: |
1. at least one aura symptom gradually spreads over >5 minutes 2. two or more symptoms occur in succession 3. each individual aura symptom lasts 5 - 60 minutes¹ 4. at least one aura symptom is unilateral2 5. at least one aura symptom is positive3 6. headache occurs within 60 minutes after the aura or during it |
D. Not better accounted for by another ICHD-3 diagnosis |
Notes:
¹ - if 3 aura symptoms occur, the maximum permissible duration is 180 minutes. Motor symptoms may last up to 72 hours;
2 - aphasia is always regarded as a unilateral symptom; dysarthria may occur;
3 - oscillations and tingling sensations are regarded as positive aura symptoms [8].
It is recommended to perform clinical diagnosis of chronic migraine (CM) in patients with frequent migraine attacks (15 or more days with headache per month) during an initial consultation (examination, consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.00) or a follow-up consultation (examination, consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.002), which includes taking medical history and complaints regarding central nervous system and brain pathology (A01.23.001) and physical examination (for details see section 2.2) (Table 3v) [8, 21, 22].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
Table 3v. Diagnostic criteria for chronic migraine (according to ICHD-3, 2018) [8]
A. Headache (migraine-like headache and/or tension-type headache) ≥ 15 days per month for ≥ 3 months, fulfilling criteria B and C |
|---|
B. Occurring in a patient who has had at least 5 attacks fulfilling criteria B–D for 1.1 Migraine without aura and/or criteria B–C for 1.2 Migraine with aura |
C. Occurrence of headache ≥ 8 days per month for 3 months, fulfilling any of the following criteria: |
– Migraine without aura (1.1 under criteria C and D) |
– Migraine with aura (1.2 under criteria B and C) |
– in the patient's opinion, a migraine attack was aborted or relieved by the intake of selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans) or ergotamine-containing medications |
D. Not better accounted for by another ICHD-3 diagnosis |
Comments: by interviewing the patient and analyzing the headache diary (if available), the number of headache days per month over the last 3 months should be established, including the number of migraine days per month, the clinical characteristics of the pain should be clarified, and these data should be compared with the diagnostic criteria for CM (Table 3v). An important diagnostic criterion for CM is also the presence of typical episodic migraine attacks at the disease onset [15, 21, 22].
Combination of migraine and medication-overuse headache (MOH). Frequent episodic migraine (more than 10 headache days per month) and especially CM (more than 15 headache days per month) can be combined with the excessive use of pain-relieving medications (medication overuse) [8, 16]. Significant medication overuse can lead to the development of MOH, presented in section 8.2 of ICHD-3 “Medication-overuse headache” (Table 4a) [8]. Medication overuse contributes to an increased frequency of headache episodes and is considered one of the leading factors in migraine chronification [14–17].
It is recommended to perform clinical diagnosis of MOH (Tables 4a and 4b) in patients with frequent episodic migraine (more than 10 headache days per month) and CM (15 or more headache days per month) based on specific clinical manifestations and the compliance of the clinical picture with the diagnostic criteria for MOH (ICHD-3) [8, 16]. Clinical diagnosis of MOH is carried out during an initial consultation (examination, consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.001) or a follow-up consultation (examination, consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.002), based on complaints and medical history (A01.23.001 Taking history and complaints in central nervous system and brain pathology).
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Table 4a. Diagnostic criteria for medication-overuse headache (according to ICHD-3, 2018) [8]
A. Headache occurring > 15 days per month in a patient with a pre-existing primary headache |
|---|
B. Regular overuse for more than 3 months of one or more drugs taken for acute and/or symptomatic treatment of headache |
C. Headache not better accounted for by another ICHD-3 diagnosis |
Comments: the diagnosis of MOH is based on the clinical evaluation of the headache, analysis of data on the number and frequency of intake of pain-relieving medications, and the type of overused drugs [8]. To clarify these characteristics, it is advisable for the patient to keep a headache diary (Appendix G). MOH manifests as a diffuse, dull, most often morning or nocturnal headache that increases in intensity as the previously taken pain-relieving medication wears off. The similarity of the clinical characteristics of MOH and CM often complicates the differential diagnosis of these cephalalgias.
It is important to determine the type of overused drugs and establish the "number of days per month with intake of pain-relieving medications" — the main diagnostic criterion for MOH (Table 4b). For example, the diagnosis of “headache associated with excessive intake of medications containing components from different pain-relieving classes” is made when one or more such drugs are regularly taken ≥ 10 days per month for more than 3 months, while “headache associated with excessive intake of other NSAIDs” – when one or more NSAIDs are regularly taken ≥ 15 days per month for more than 3 months [8]. The highest risk of MOH is observed with the use of pain-relieving medications containing narcotic components (codeine, etc.), barbiturates, and caffeine** [8, 17, 23]. Instrumental diagnostic methods are not used for MOH diagnosis due to their low informativeness [14].
If clinical signs of MOH are identified in a patient with CM, two diagnoses should be made. For example, "Chronic migraine. MOH associated with excessive triptan use" [9, 15, 17].
Table 4b. Classification of MOH forms (according to ICHD-3, 2018) [8]
MOH form | Number of days per month with intake of pain-relieving medications (regular intake for 3 months or more): | |
|---|---|---|
8.2.1 Ergotamine-overuse headache | intake of ergotamine-containing medications ≥ 10 days per month | |
8.2.2 Triptan-overuse headache | intake of one or more selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans) ≥ 10 days per month | |
8.2.3 Non-triptan, non-ergotamine analgesic and NSAID-overuse headache | ||
8.2.3.1. Paracetamol-overuse headache** | paracetamol** intake ≥ 15 days per month | |
8.2.3.2. NSAID-overuse headache | intake of one or more NSAIDs ≥ 15 days per month | |
8.2.3.2.1. Acetylsalicylic acid-overuse headache** | acetylsalicylic acid** intake ≥ 15 days per month | |
8.2.3.3. Other analgesic-overuse headache | intake of one or more analgesics and antipyretics ≥ 15 days per month | |
8.2.4. Opioid-overuse headache | intake of one or more opioids ≥ 10 days per month | |
8.2.5. Combination analgesic-overuse headache | intake of one or more analgesics containing components from different pain-relieving classes ≥ 10 days per month | |
8.2.6. Headache associated with multiple drug classes overuse (without clear predominance of a single class) | intake of any combination of ergotamine, selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans), analgesics, and NSAIDs ≥ 10 days per month without overuse of any single drug or drug class | |
8.2.7. Headache associated with unspecified overuse of multiple drug classes | intake of any combination of ergotamine, selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans), analgesics, and NSAIDs ≥ 10 days per month, when it is difficult to accurately determine the specific drug, its quantity, and frequency of intake | |
8.2.8. Other medication-overuse headache | intake ≥ 10 days per month of any other medications not specified above | |
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
Patients with migraine present with typical complaints of recurring attacks of unilateral pulsating headache in the frontotemporal or parietal region, of moderate or severe intensity (more than 7 scores on the visual analogue scale for pain (VAS, Appendix G2), lasting 4–72 hours, aggravated by routine physical activity, accompanied by nausea and/or vomiting, as well as photophobia and phonophobia [1, 2, 3, 8]. Complaints of visual, sensory, speech, and less frequently motor disturbances are possible, which gradually develop over 5–20 minutes before or during the headache attack, usually last no more than 60 minutes (motor disturbances up to 72 hours), and then completely disappear, which is characteristic of a migraine aura [8, 11, 12, 18–20]. Migraine attacks are most often triggered by stress or relaxation after stress, lack or excess of night sleep, weather changes, menstruation, hunger, stuffiness, bright or flickering light, noise, physical exertion, alcohol, or caffeine-containing beverages [1, 3]. The frequency of migraine attacks and the regularity of medication intake to abort pain during a migraine attack can vary significantly, which is also clarified during the collection of complaints.
The anamnesis of patients with migraine has characteristic features [1, 2, 3, 9]. It is typical for the first attacks to occur at a young age, before 20 years, and for similar headaches to occur in relatives (family history). Patients report specific periods in their lives during which the course of migraine changed: a decrease in frequency or complete cessation of headache attacks during pregnancy or with the onset of menopause; worsening/progression/chronicization of migraine under the influence of emotional stress, depression and/or anxiety, excessive use of analgesic drugs, use of hormonal oral contraceptives, and during the premenopausal period in women [14 - 17]. The anamnesis of patients with migraine often indicates various concomitant somatic and mental disorders, among which the most common are emotional and affective disorders (depression, anxiety disorders), sleep disorders (insomnia, bruxism, restless legs syndrome, sleep apnea), other chronic pain syndromes, including back pain and temporomandibular joint pain dysfunction, as well as irritable bowel syndrome, allergies, obesity, and cardiovascular diseases [14, 15].
It is recommended that patients with any form of migraine be questioned to identify concomitant comorbid disorders (CD), primarily depression, anxiety disorders, sleep disorders, and other pain syndromes [2, 14, 15, 18, 19]. The analysis of comorbid conditions is performed during the initial examination (consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.001) or a follow-up examination (consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.002) based on the patient's anamnesis and complaints (A01.23.001 Anamnesis and complaints collection in pathology of the central nervous system and brain, A01.02.001 Anamnesis and complaints collection in muscle diseases, A01.03.001 Anamnesis and complaints collection in bone system pathology, A01.07.003.001 Palpation in oral cavity pathology, including the cranio-maxillofacial region, A01.30.009 Therapeutic anamnesis and complaints collection, A01.29.001 Complaints and anamnesis collection (objective and subjective) in psychiatry).
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: CD contribute to a more severe course and increased frequency of migraine attacks (chronicization of migraine), worsen the patient's condition between headache attacks, and lead to more pronounced maladaptation and a worse prognosis. Therefore, the identification and treatment of comorbid disorders is an important task in the management of patients with migraine.
2.2 Physical Examination
Clinical diagnosis of migraine, along with the analysis of complaints and anamnesis, includes a neurological examination of the patient.
It is recommended to perform a neurological status examination in order to rule out organic neurological symptoms and a possible symptomatic nature of the headache [9, 15, 19, 21, 24, 25] as part of the initial examination (consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.001) or follow-up examination (consultation) by a neurologist (B01.023.002) based on: A01.23.002 Visual examination in pathology of the central nervous system and brain, A01.23.003 Palpation in pathology of the central nervous system and brain, A01.23.004 Examination of sensory and motor spheres in pathology of the central nervous system and brain.
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: in a typical course of migraine, no pathological changes are found in the neurological status. There may be a depressed mood, signs of increased anxiety, autonomic disorders (hyperventilation, palmar hyperhidrosis, signs of increased neuromuscular excitability in the form of Chvostek's sign grade I - III), tension and tenderness of pericranial muscles upon palpation.
If organic symptoms (meningeal, general cerebral, and/or focal neurological signs) are detected in the neurological status, additional instrumental and laboratory examinations are performed, the choice of which is determined by the nature of the pathological changes and the suspected underlying disease causing the detected disorders [8, 15, 18 - 20].
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
Since the diagnosis of migraine is clinical, laboratory methods are not mandatory.
Laboratory diagnostic methods are not recommended for diagnosing migraine in the presence of a typical clinical picture and normal neurological examination findings due to their lack of informativeness [1, 2, 3, 9, 15, 20].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: Laboratory methods are not informative in the diagnosis of migraine because they do not reveal changes specific to this disease.
Laboratory examinations are recommended in the atypical clinical picture of migraine presenting with at least one red flag symptom indicating the presence of another disease that may be the cause of the headache and/or migraine complications (danger symptoms): B03.016.002 Complete blood count, B03.016.001 Complex of tests to assess general inflammatory reactions, B03.005.006 Coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis study) [1, 2, 3].
GPP CLoE 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
Instrumental examinations in patients with migraine are uninformative as they do not reveal changes specific to migraine.
Instrumental diagnostic methods are not recommended for diagnosing migraine in the presence of a typical clinical picture and normal neurological examination findings [15, 18, 20, 24 - 26].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: in the majority of patients with migraine, instrumental examination methods do not reveal any specific changes. In a number of patients, standard T2-weighted brain MRI may reveal isolated subclinical hyperintense foci in the subcortical white matter of the cerebral hemispheres, less commonly in the brainstem structures [26]. It is hypothesized that these focal changes are a consequence of transient cerebral perfusion disturbances recorded during repeated migraine attacks by magnetic resonance imaging. It has been shown that migraine may be an independent risk factor for the development of subclinical focal ischemic brain lesions [11]. Since these foci lack specific morphological features, they cannot be considered neuroimaging markers of migraine.
Instrumental examinations are recommended in rare forms of migraine with aura and migraine complications in order to rule out organic brain pathology and/or cerebral vascular disorders (aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation, carotid artery dissection), which include: A05.23.009 Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, A05.12.007 Magnetic resonance angiography (one region), A05.12.006 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (one region), A05.12.005 Magnetic resonance venography (one region) [9, 12, 18, 20, 24, 25].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: If technical facilities are unavailable or there are medical contraindications for MRI, A06.23.004 Computed tomography of the brain, A06.12.056 Computed tomography angiography of cerebral vessels, A06.23.004.007 Computed tomography of cerebral vessels with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement are indicated.
Instrumental examinations and specialist consultations are recommended for diagnosing migraine in patients with an atypical course of migraine or presenting with at least one red flag symptom indicating the presence of another disease that may be the cause of the headache (Tab. 5), which include: A05.23.009 Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, A05.12.007 Magnetic resonance angiography (one region), A05.12.006 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (one region), A05.12.005 Magnetic resonance venography (one region), as well as, if necessary, consultations with related specialists (B01.029.001 initial ophthalmologist consultation/examination, including anamnesis and complaints collection in eye pathology (A01.26.001), B01.028.001 initial otorhinolaryngologist consultation/examination, B01.034.001 initial psychotherapist consultation/examination) [10, 20, 24 - 26].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: If technical facilities are unavailable or there are medical contraindications for MRI, A06.23.004 Computed tomography of the brain, A06.12.056 Computed tomography angiography of cerebral vessels, A06.23.004.007 Computed tomography of cerebral vessels with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement are indicated.
Table 5. List of red flag symptoms («warning signs») in patients with headache
1 Headache first occurring after age 50, or a headache that has changed its course |
|---|
2 «Thunderclap headache» or headache escalating to 10 points on the visual analogue scale within 1 - 2 seconds |
3 Strictly unilateral headache |
4 Progressively worsening headache without remissions |
5 Suddenly occurring, unusual headache for the patient |
6 Atypical migrainous aura (with unusual visual, sensory, or motor disturbances and/or duration >1 hour) |
7 Alterations in consciousness (drowsiness, confusion, or memory loss) or mental disorders |
8 Focal neurological signs and symptoms of a systemic disease (fever, skin rash, nuchal rigidity, arthralgia, or myalgia) |
9 Signs of intracranial hypertension (exacerbation of headache with coughing, straining, physical exertion) |
10 Papilledema |
11 History of HIV infection, oncological, endocrine, or other systemic disease, or head trauma |
12 Onset of headache during pregnancy or in the postpartum period |
13 Ineffectiveness of adequate ongoing treatment |
2.5 Other Procedures
To establish the clinical characteristics of the attack, the number of headache days per month (determining the migraine form), and the number of days using analgesic medications, it is advisable for the patient to keep a headache diary (Appendix G1). Keeping a headache diary for 1 to 3 months prior to the examination helps the patient and the physician differentiate one type of headache from another (e.g., a migraine attack from an episode of tension-type headache), determine the number of headache days per month, and the number of days per month with analgesic medication intake.
It is recommended that all patients with suspected migraine use a headache diary (Appendix A3.1) in specialized headache and pain centers to facilitate differential diagnosis with tension-type headache and to detect medication overuse [2, 5, 10].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
2.5.1 Differential Diagnosis
Differential diagnosis in patients with migraine is most frequently performed with tension-type headache, cluster headache, chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, and cervicogenic headache. A differential diagnosis requires a thorough interview and physical examination of the patient, analysis of medical history and triggering factors; maintaining a headache diary is advisable. Less commonly, migraine must be differentiated from rare secondary cephalalgias associated with neurological and somatic diseases [2, 9, 20, 21]. Headaches resembling migraine may occur in the following conditions:
transient ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke;
giant cell arteritis;
arterial dissection, aneurysms, and arteriovenous malformations;
cerebral venous thrombosis;
brain tumor;
subarachnoid hemorrhage;
antiphospholipid syndrome and thrombophilias;
epilepsy (when migrainous headache is combined with an epileptic seizure);
MELAS syndrome (Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy, Lactic Acidosis, and Stroke-like episodes) and CADASIL syndrome (Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy).
Unlike typical migraine as a primary headache form, the aforementioned diseases and syndromes always manifest with corresponding neurological deficit symptoms or other "red flags" not typical of migraine (see Section 2.4).
In a single patient, migraine may coexist with other cephalalgias, both primary (tension-type headache; primary headaches associated with physical or sexual activity, cold stimuli, etc.) and secondary (medication-overuse headache, cervicogenic headache, headache associated with temporomandibular joint dysfunction). In such cases, all identified headache forms should be included in the diagnosis; for example, "Migraine without aura. Episodic tension-type headache with pericranial muscle dysfunction" or "Chronic migraine. Medication-overuse headache associated with the use of selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans). Headache associated with temporomandibular joint dysfunction" [9, 16, 21].
It is recommended to perform a differential diagnosis of migraine without aura (MoA) with tension-type headache, cluster headache, chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, and cervicogenic headache [1, 2, 9, 20].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended to perform a differential diagnosis between migraine with aura (MA) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) due to clinical similarities during the initial neurological consultation (examination, evaluation) (B01.023.001) or follow-up neurological consultation (examination, evaluation) (B01.023.002), including A01.23.001 Taking history and complaints in central nervous system and brain pathology, A01.23.002 Visual examination in central nervous system and brain pathology, A01.23.004 Examination of sensory and motor spheres in central nervous system and brain pathology; as well as instrumental examinations (A05.23.009 Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, A05.12.004 Magnetic resonance arteriography (one region), A05.12.006 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (one region)) [11, 12].
GOR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: migrainous aura is typically characterized by a gradual progression of clinical manifestations in a specific sequence over 10–30 (up to 60) minutes on one side of the body, presenting as a so-called "march" with alternating "positive" and "negative" symptoms: visual symptoms (scintillations, brilliant zigzag lines or flashes, dark spots, scotomas, visual field defects), followed by paresthesias, numbness spreading from the hand up to the shoulder and facial area; speech disorders may subsequently develop; at the end of the migrainous aura, migrainous headache develops. Unlike a migraine attack with aura, neurological deficits in TIA are "negative" in character (visual field defects, scotomas, numbness of one limb), appear acutely (within minutes) simultaneously, and headache development is not typical; patients generally have no history of migraine. If technical capabilities are lacking or there are medical contraindications for MRI, performing A06.23.004 Computed tomography of the brain, A06.12.056 Computed tomography angiography of cerebral vessels, A06.23.004.007 Computed tomography of cerebral vessels with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement is indicated.
It is recommended to perform a differential diagnosis of chronic migraine with chronic tension-type headache (CTTH), as well as with new daily persistent headache and hemicrania continua during the initial neurological examination/consultation (B01.023.001) or follow-up neurological examination/consultation (B01.023.002) based on A01.23.001 Taking history and complaints in central nervous system and brain pathology [10, 14, 21].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: difficulties in the differential diagnosis between chronic migraine and chronic tension-type headache are related to the fact that the leading clinical manifestations of chronic migraine include both persistent frequent migraine attacks and tension-type-like "background" pain. In such cases, one should rely on early history data: in patients with chronic migraine, unlike chronic tension-type headache, the onset of the disease is marked by typical episodes of episodic migraine and other characteristic migraine features (family history, typical migraine triggers, relief of headache during pregnancy) [15, 22, 27]. In the presence of medication overuse, chronic migraine combined with medication-overuse headache should be differentiated from chronic tension-type headache combined with medication-overuse headache.
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
Three approaches to migraine treatment are recommended: behavioral therapy, acute headache attack relief, and preventive treatment [15, 18, 20, 28].
GRC CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: the main goals of migraine treatment are: reducing the frequency and severity of headache attacks, decreasing the intake of analgesic medications, correcting comorbid disorders (CDs), preventing disease chronification, and improving patients' quality of life.
3.1 Behavioral therapy
Behavioral therapy aimed at modifying the lifestyle of a migraine patient is recommended as part of individual short preventive counseling on correcting risk factors for non-communicable diseases (B04.070.002) during the initial neurological examination/consultation (B01.023.001); during the follow-up neurological examination/consultation (B01.023.002), individual in-depth preventive counseling on correcting risk factors for non-communicable diseases (B04.070.003) is conducted [96, 140].
CGR BLEL 1Level of recommendation grade – B (level of evidence – 1).
Comments: informing and educating a migraine patient can be carried out by a physician or nursing staff either during an in-person conversation or remotely using popular literature and internet resources. The main provisions of behavioral therapy include: explaining the benign nature and mechanisms of migraine (reassuring the patient against organic causes of the headache); substantiating the inadvisability of additional tests (except for suspected symptomatic migraine); discussing the role of headache triggers and the need to avoid them; discussing risk factors for disease chronification (stress, medication overuse, psychiatric and other comorbidities) and the need for their prevention; explaining the goals of migraine treatment, mechanisms of action of preventive drugs, and the benefits of non-pharmacological methods. Patients abusing analgesic medications should be informed about the role of medication overuse in migraine chronification, the need for temporary cessation of intake, and strict continuous monitoring of the number of analgesic medications taken [15, 18, 20].
3.2 Acute migraine treatment
It is recommended to treat a migraine attack to reduce the intensity and duration of the headache, alleviate accompanying symptoms, and restore the patient's general condition during an initial outpatient visit (examination, consultation) with a neurologist (B01.023.001) or a follow-up visit (examination, consultation) with a neurologist (B01.023.002), including the prescription of medicinal products for diseases of the central nervous system and brain (A25.23.001) [15].
GRC CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended to prescribe pharmacotherapy depending on the severity of the attack and the degree of the patient's functional impairment [18].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: a mild migraine attack is an episode during which the patient is able to perform routine household and professional activities; a moderate attack is one where these activities are significantly limited; a severe migraine attack requires bed rest [20, 28].
3.2.1 Treatment of mild to moderate migraine attacks
Analgesics and antipyretics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (NSAIDs) should be used to abort migraine attacks (Table 6a).
It is recommended to use acetylsalicylic acid** 1000 mg as a first-choice drug for aborting migraine attacks [30, 31].
GCR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
It is recommended to use ibuprofen** 400 mg as a first-choice drug for aborting migraine attacks [32, 33].
GCR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
It is recommended to use naproxen 500 mg as a first-choice drug for aborting migraine attacks [35].
GCR CLEL 1Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 1).
It is recommended to use paracetamol** 1000 mg as a first-choice drug for aborting migraine attacks [37].
GCR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
It is recommended to use diclofenac** 50 mg as a powder for oral solution as a first-choice drug for aborting migraine attacks [36, 38].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
It is recommended to use ketoprofen** 75 or 150 mg for aborting migraine attacks [42].
GPR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is recommended to use a combination drug for aborting migraine attacks – acetylsalicylic acid + caffeine + paracetamol, containing 2 tablets of acetylsalicylic acid, paracetamol, and caffeine orally [34].
GPR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Table 6a. Analgesics, antipyretics, and NSAIDs recommended for aborting migraine attacks
Drug | Dose, mg | Comment |
|---|---|---|
Acetylsalicylic acid** | 1000 orally | Gastrointestinal adverse effects |
Ibuprofen** | 400 mg orally | Gastrointestinal adverse effects |
Naproxen | 500 mg orally | Gastrointestinal adverse effects |
Paracetamol** | 1000 orally | Prescribe with caution as it may cause renal and hepatic impairment |
Diclofenac** | 50 mg orally | Gastrointestinal adverse effects |
Ketoprofen** | 75 mg or 150 mg orally | Gastrointestinal adverse effects |
Acetylsalicylic acid + Caffeine + Paracetamol | 2 tablets orally | Gastrointestinal adverse effects |
Comments: the principles of using other analgesics, antipyretics, and NSAIDs imply that the choice of drug should be based on their efficacy and adverse effect profile [28, 30 - 39]:
- NSAIDs and acetylsalicylic acid** are more effective than paracetamol**;
- ibuprofen** at a dose of 400 mg is considered the drug of first choice, as it has the lowest potential for gastrointestinal complications;
- keeping a headache diary is advisable to monitor the correct use of analgesic medications;
- when using NSAIDs, adverse effects must be taken into account, primarily gastrointestinal effects and the risk of bleeding;
- any medications containing metamizole sodium are not recommended for aborting migraine attacks due to the risk of agranulocytosis; opioid analgesics and analgesic medications containing codeine or barbiturates are also not recommended (due to the high risk of medication overuse and medication-overuse headache [MOH]);
- rapid-dissolving forms of NSAIDs act faster compared to their standard tablet counterparts (ketoprofen** as lysine salt in granules for oral solution in doses of 40 or 80 mg, diclofenac** 50 mg as a powder for oral solution [38, 45].
It is recommended to use the antiemetic drug (gastrointestinal motility stimulant) metoclopramide** intramuscularly in combination with an analgesic for treating migraine attacks in patients with nausea and/or vomiting to relieve these symptoms and improve the absorption of analgesic medications (Table 6b) [39].
GCR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
It is recommended to use metoclopramide** at a dose of 10–20 mg orally or domperidone 10 mg 3 times a day orally for treating migraine attacks in patients with nausea to relieve nausea and improve drug absorption [39].
GRC CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: antiemetic drugs (gastrointestinal motility stimulants) reduce gastroparesis, which typically accompanies a migraine attack, and improve the absorption of analgesic medications [1 - 3, 20].
Table 6b. Antiemetic drugs recommended for treating migraine attacks (ATC: Gastrointestinal motility stimulants)
Drug | Single dose, mg | Comment |
|---|---|---|
Metoclopramide** | 10 - 20 mg orally | Adverse effects: dyskinesia; also possesses analgesic properties |
10 mg intramuscularly | ||
Domperidone | 10 mg 3 times daily orally | Adverse effects are less pronounced than those of metoclopramide** |
3.2.2 Treatment of severe migraine attacks
It is recommended to use selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans): sumatriptan, eletriptan, zolmitriptan, and rizatriptan for severe migraine attacks and when other analgesics, antipyretics, and NSAIDs are ineffective (Table 6c) [46 - 47, 51 - 52].
GOR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
Table 6c. Selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans) recommended for aborting migraine attacks
Medication Agent | Single dose | Comment |
|---|---|---|
Sumatriptan | 50 mg or 100 mg orally | Adverse effects: dizziness, somnolence, sensory disturbances including paresthesia and hypoesthesia, transient blood pressure elevation, flushing, dyspnea |
Eletriptan | 40 mg or 80 mg orally | Adverse effects: somnolence, dizziness, tingling sensation or other sensory disturbances, muscle hypertonus, tachycardia, feeling of tightness in the throat |
Zolmitriptan | 2.5 mg or 5 mg orally 2.5 mg or 5 mg nasal spray | Adverse effects: sensory disturbances, dizziness, hyperesthesia, paresthesia, somnolence, feeling of warmth or cold |
Rizatriptan | 10 mg orally 10 mg orally disintegrating tablets | Adverse effects: dizziness, somnolence, and asthenia/fatigue |
Comments: selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans) exhibit the highest efficacy and can also be used for moderate migraine attacks [28, 48 - 50, 53 - 55]. Table 6c lists the selective 5-HT1 receptor agonists registered in the Russian Federation. For more effective treatment of migraine attacks without aura, selective 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans) should be taken at the very onset of the headache – within the first 30 minutes of headache onset [53]; it is also recommended to take sumatriptan at a dose of at least 50 mg, eletriptan – at least 40 mg, zolmitriptan – at least 2.5 mg, and rizatriptan – at least 10 mg [172]. In migraine with aura, selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists must not be administered during the aura phase: if the headache occurs simultaneously with or at the end of the aura, selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists can be taken at the end of the aura phase or at the beginning of the headache phase [54]. Selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists should not be used for more than 10 days per month to avoid medication overuse and the development of medication-overuse headache (MOH). Re-administration of selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists is possible 2 hours after the first dose; no more than 2 doses of selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists should be taken per day; if one selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonist is ineffective, other drugs from this class should be tried. The main contraindications for prescribing selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists include ischemic heart disease, peripheral occlusive vascular disease, uncontrolled arterial hypertension, and migraine with brainstem aura.
Due to its minimal constrictor effect on coronary arteries, eletriptan is the safest selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonist in patients with potential cardiovascular disease risk [55].
All adverse effects associated with triptan intake are generally mild, resolve quickly, and do not require treatment. Triptan tolerability is individual, and if one is poorly tolerated, another triptan should be prescribed.
Zolmitriptan, a selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonist nasal spray, is preferred in patients who require a rapid onset of action (begins acting within 15 minutes), as well as in the presence of severe nausea and vomiting [48].
Rizatriptan, a selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonist orally disintegrating tablet, does not require swallowing with water and dissolves on the tongue, making it successful for use in the presence of severe nausea and vomiting, since the liquid required to swallow a conventional tablet may exacerbate the accompanying dyspeptic symptoms of a migraine attack [54].
It is recommended for the treatment of a severe migraine attack, especially when oral administration is impossible due to severe nausea and vomiting, #ketorolac** 60 mg intramuscularly or 30 mg intravenously [41].
GOR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
3.2.3 Treatment of status migrainosus
Treatment of migrainous status (MS) is aimed at reducing the intensity and duration of headache and accompanying symptoms, and restoring the patient's general condition via A25.23.001 Prescription of medicinal products for central nervous system and brain diseases and A25.23.003 Prescription of a therapeutic and health-improving regimen for central nervous system and brain diseases.
It is recommended to use selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans) in patients with migrainous status if the patient has not previously taken them to abort the migraine attack [28, 29, 46, 47].
GCR BLEL 1Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 1).
It is recommended that in patients with MS, it should be aborted in an inpatient setting by parenteral administration of the following medicinal products (for doses see Table 7).:
metoclopramide** [29, 39, 43],
GOR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
#chlorpromazine [56, 57],
GCR BLOC 2Level of recommendations grading — B (level of evidence certainty - 2).
#dexketoprofen** [40, 58],
GCR BLOC 2Level of recommendations grading — B (level of evidence certainty - 2).
#ketorolac** [41],
GOR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
#magnesium sulfate** [59 - 61],
GCR BLOC 2Level of recommendations grading — B (level of evidence certainty - 2).
#valproic acid** [44, 62, 63],
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2)
#dexamethasone** [64 - 68]
GoR ALoE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
Comments: The choice (combination) of agents is determined by the clinical picture, severity of MS, and the patient's individual characteristics. Upon hospitalization, the patient undergoes B01.023.003 Daily examination by a neurologist with observation and care by nursing and junior medical staff in the inpatient department.
Table 7. Medicinal products recommended for aborting migrainous status
Medications | Doses (single) | Route of administration | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
Metoclopramide** | 10 mg | intravenously as an infusion in 50 ml of sodium chloride** solution | Administration over 20 minutes |
#Chlorpromazine | 0.1 mg per 1 kg of body weight | intravenous infusion in sodium chloride** solution | |
#Dexketoprofen** | 50 mg | intravenously | |
#Ketorolac** | 60 mg intramuscularly or 30 mg intravenously | intramuscularly or intravenously | |
#Magnesium sulfate** | 2 g | intravenous infusion in sodium chloride** solution | Only for the treatment of status migrainosus with aura in patients with migraine with aura |
#Valproic acid** | 800 - 1000 mg | intravenously | Not recommended in women of childbearing potential |
#Dexamethasone** | 10 - 24 mg | intravenously | To prevent migraine attack recurrence, rather than to abort the headache |
It is not recommended to administer droperidol** intravenously in status migrainosus due to the risk of adverse reactions [69, 70].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is not recommended to administer haloperidol** as an intravenous infusion due to a high risk of adverse reactions [71, 72].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: Fewer adverse events are observed with metoclopramide** compared to droperidol** and haloperidol** [72]. Adverse effects of antipsychotics may include extrapyramidal symptoms (akathisia, tardive dyskinesia, etc.), decreased blood pressure, and drowsiness. Prolonged QT interval is a contraindication to prescribing antipsychotics; therefore, electrocardiography is recommended prior to their administration.
In status migrainosus (SM), #dexamethasone** is used not to abort the headache, but to prevent headache recurrence during the SM attack; #dexamethasone** is administered intravenously at a mean dose of 10 mg (dose range from 10 to 24 mg) [64 - 68]. Parenteral fluid administration for headache relief in SM is not indicated; however, in case of recurrent vomiting and dehydration, parenteral fluid administration for rehydration is possible [73]. Patients with SM also experience significant discomfort from light and sound exposure; therefore, therapeutic procedures should be performed in a quiet and darkened room.
3.3 Preventive therapy
It is recommended to provide prophylactic treatment to patients with migraine who experience 3 or more severe disabling headache attacks per month despite adequate acute migraine treatment, or ≥ 8 headache days per month, as well as to patients with prolonged aura, even with a low attack frequency [2, 9, 20, 74] via A25.23.001 Prescription of medicinal products for diseases of the central nervous system and brain and B04.070.003 Individualized advanced preventive counseling on the correction of risk factors for non-communicable diseases as part of the initial visit (examination, consultation) of a neurologist (B01.023.001) and/or follow-up visit (examination, consultation) of a neurologist (B01.023.002) [2, 9, 20, 74].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: other indications for migraine prophylactic treatment include [9, 15, 20, 74 - 78]:
- inefficacy or poor tolerability of acute migraine medications;
- chronic migraine;
- medication overuse, medication-overuse headache (MOH);
- migraine subtypes posing a risk of brain damage (stroke): history of migrainous infarction or status migrainosus, migraine with brainstem aura, hemiplegic migraine;
- severe comorbid disorders (primarily psychiatric ones – depression, anxiety, phobias, sleep disorders);
- patient preference for prophylactic therapy to alleviate the course of migraine and improve quality of life.
It is recommended to consider prophylactic treatment effective if the frequency of headache days is reduced by 50% or more from baseline after 3 months of therapy [2, 9, 75, 76]. Assessment of prophylactic therapy efficacy is based on the collection of complaints and medical history (A01.23.001 Collection of history and complaints in central nervous system and brain pathology) and is performed at 3 months during a follow-up consultation (examination) by a neurologist (B01.023.002).
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: prophylactic treatment in patients with migraine is carried out in compliance with the following principles:
- explaining to the patient the rationale, mechanisms of action, and potential side effects of prophylactic agents;
- medications with proven efficacy should be used, initiating treatment with monotherapy;
- drugs must be prescribed in adequate therapeutic doses for a sufficient duration for the clinical effect to develop (3 months or more);
- in the absence of effect within 3 months, the chosen prophylactic agent should be replaced with another drug; the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) should be assessed after at least 6 months of therapy;
- upon achieving an effect, prolonged (6-12 months) use of the selected prophylactic agent at an adequately tolerated dose is necessary;
- an attempt to gradually taper off the drug(s) may then be undertaken;
- slow dose titration is advisable to minimize side effects;
- situations should be avoided where insufficiently effective prophylaxis (due to an improperly selected drug or its inadequate dose) leads to overuse of acute migraine medications (more than 2 days per week);
- when choosing a prophylactic agent, concomitant/comorbid conditions should be taken into account. In particular, a drug that is also effective in treating the comorbid condition should be selected (e.g., an antidepressant in a patient with migraine and comorbid depression);
- therapy for a comorbid condition that may contribute to migraine exacerbation or increased medication overuse should be avoided;
- the duration of prophylactic therapy should be 6 months for episodic migraine and 12 months for chronic migraine.
First-line prophylactic agents (Table 8):
It is recommended for migraine prophylaxis as first-line agents beta-blockers – metoprolol** 100 - 200 mg/day [76, 80, 167].
GCR BLOC 2Level of recommendations grading — B (level of evidence certainty - 2).
It is recommended for migraine prophylaxis as first-line agents beta-blockers – propranolol** 80 - 160 mg/day [76, 79, 80].
GoR ALoE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
Comments: lower doses of beta-blockers may be used in patients with arterial hypotension [2, 3, 9].
It is recommended to use topiramate** 100 - 200 mg/day as a first-line agent for migraine prevention [81, 83, 84, 168].
GCR BLEL 1Grade of Recommendations — B (Level of Evidence — 1).
Comments: topiramate** is prescribed in a long-term course (up to 12 months) with dose titration from 25 mg to the recommended dose of 100 mg; the dose may be increased up to 200 mg per day; taking the main dose of the drug in the evening is preferred.
It is recommended to use botulinum toxin type A – hemagglutinin complex** 155 - 195 IU according to the PREEMPT protocol [85] for the prevention of chronic migraine (A25.24.001.002 Administration of botulinum toxin in diseases of the peripheral nervous system)
GoR ALoE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
Comments: botulinum toxin type A – hemagglutinin complex** is used for migraine only in patients with the chronic form. After reconstituting 100 IU of the drug in 2 ml or 200 IU in 4 ml of sodium chloride** solution, it is injected according to the PREEMPT protocol into the projection of 7 head and neck muscle groups (bilaterally into mm. frontalis; mm. corrugator supercilii; mm. temporalis; mm. occipitalis; mm. trapezius; mm. paraspinalis cervicis, and m. procerus) [85, 99, 100]. The total dose of the drug per procedure is 155 - 195 IU. The efficacy of a single procedure (reduction in the number of headache days by 50% or more) usually persists for 3 months, therefore repeat injections of the drug are recommended every 12 weeks. Patients may simultaneously receive other medications for migraine prevention. Botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex** is also effective in patients with chronic migraine combined with medication-overuse headache [108, 109, 131].
It is recommended for the prevention of migraine in patients with 4 or more headache days per month to use calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists as first-line agents: fremanezumab 225 mg subcutaneously monthly or 675 mg subcutaneously once every three months, and erenumab 70 or 140 mg subcutaneously monthly [86 - 89].
GRL ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists (monoclonal antibodies against the main migraine pain mediator calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor (or anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies)) represent the first class of drugs specifically designed for targeted (pathogenetically substantiated) prophylactic therapy of episodic and chronic migraine in adults. mAb therapy can be used when the frequency is 4 or more migraine days per month.
Fremanezumab and erenumab may be prescribed for a duration of 6 to 12 months or more, depending on the efficacy and tolerability of the therapy. The efficacy of therapy should be evaluated 3 months after its initiation. According to real-world clinical practice studies, treatment with calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists can reduce the number of headache days per month by 50%, 75%, as well as by 100% (temporary remission). In real-world clinical practice in the USA and Europe, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists are used for several years (continuous use period up to 5 years). The decision on the duration of treatment is made by the attending physician and depends on the efficacy and tolerability of the therapy. For chronic migraine, extending the course of therapy to 18 months is indicated [86 - 89].
Second-line preventive agents (Tab. 8):
It is recommended to use #atenolol** 100 mg/day for migraine prevention [97].
GCR BLEL 2Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is recommended to use antidepressants for migraine prevention: #amitriptyline** 50 - 150 mg/day and #venlafaxine 75 - 150 mg/day [90 - 93].
GCR BLEL 1Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – B (Level of Evidence – 1).
Comments: the listed antidepressants possess their own analgesic effect [1, 2, 9, 15]. The use of antidepressants is especially useful in patients with comorbid disorders (depression, anxiety disorders, insomnia) [1, 2, 9, 15].
It is recommended to use #candesartan 16 mg/day for migraine prevention [94 - 95].
GCR BLEL 2Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is recommended to use #valproic acid** 400 - 1500 mg orally for migraine prevention [81, 82].
GCR ALEL 1Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
Comments: the prescription of #valproic acid** is undesirable in women of childbearing potential due to the high risk of teratogenic effects [81, 82].
Table 8. Medications recommended for migraine prevention
Medications | Daily dose, mg | References | |
|---|---|---|---|
First-line medications | |||
Beta-blockers Metoprolol** Propranolol** | 100 - 200 orally | 76, 80, 167 | |
80 - 160 mg orally | 76, 79, 80 | ||
Antiepileptic drugs Topiramate** | 100 - 200 mg orally | 81, 83, 84, 168 | |
Botulinum toxin type A-hemagglutinin complex**2 2For the treatment of chronic migraine only | 155 - 195 IU, according to the PREEMPT protocol1 every 12 weeks | 85,108, 109, 131 | |
Monoclonal antibodies to CGRP or its receptor3 Fremanezumab Erenumab 3with 4 or more migraine days per month | subcutaneously 225 mg once a month or 675 mg once every 3 months subcutaneously 70 mg or 140 mg once a month | 86 - 89 | |
Second-line medications | |||
Beta-blockers #Atenolol** | 100 mg orally | 97 | |
Antiepileptic drugs #Valproic acid** | 400 - 1500 mg orally | 81,82 | |
Antidepressants #Amitriptyline** #Venlafaxine | 50 - 150 mg orally 75 - 150 mg orally | 90 - 93 | |
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists #Candesartan | 16 mg orally | 94 - 95 | |
1 – PREEMPT – Phase III Research Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy – Phase III clinical research program to evaluate migraine prophylactic therapy.
3.4 Specifics of the management of migraine combined with medication-overuse headache (MOH)
It is recommended in patients with frequent episodic migraine to use behavioral therapy (patient education) to prevent the development of MOH [101] as part of individual in-depth preventive counseling on the correction of risk factors for non-communicable diseases (B04.070.004) during a follow-up visit (examination, consultation) with a neurologist (B01.023.002) [101].
GCR BLEL 2Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: patients with frequent episodic migraine (8 or more migraine headache days per month and about 8 - 10 days of analgesic drug intake per month) represent a risk group for developing MOH. In at-risk patients, preventing medication overuse via behavioral therapy is more effective than treating already established MOH [102].
The main strategies for preventing MOH in the risk group include: educating patients on the safe regimen of acute migraine medication intake (no more than 2 days a week – no more than 8 days a month) and controlling other risk factors for migraine chronification (emotional status, stressful life events, sleep quality, caffeine intake, body weight). It is necessary to explain to the patient that abusing acute migraine medications contributes to an increased frequency of headache days (migraine chronification and development of MOH), and that the only way to relieve headaches is to withdraw the abused drug(s).
It is recommended in patients abusing other analgesics and antipyretics and/or selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans) to provide counseling and advice on the temporary withdrawal or significant reduction of the intake of drugs that caused MOH [103, 104] as part of initial (B04.070.003) or follow-up (B04.070.004) individual in-depth preventive counseling on the correction of risk factors for non-communicable diseases during the initial (B01.023.001) and/or follow-up (B01.023.002) visit (examination, consultation) with a neurologist based on A01.23.001 Taking of anamnesis and complaints in pathology of the central nervous system and brain.
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: these methods are insufficiently effective in patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders (depression, anxiety) who abuse opioids, anxiolytics, barbiturates, or multiple classes of analgesic drugs simultaneously and have a history of failed attempts to withdraw the abused drugs.
It is recommended for the reverse transformation of chronic migraine into an episodic form to withdraw the analgesic drug(s) that caused MOH [105 - 119, 169 - 171].
LoE AGoE 3Level of Evidence – A (Grade of Recommendation – 3).
Comments: both full and partial withdrawal of the "offending" medication(s) can be used. The number of days with intake of any analgesic medications should not exceed 2 per week (8 per month). Discontinuation of other analgesics and antipyretics, as well as selective 5-HT1 serotonin receptor agonists (triptans), can be performed in an outpatient setting; discontinuation of opioids, antispasmodics, psychotropic drugs, and combination analgesics, including cases combined with benzodiazepine derivative abuse, should be performed in an inpatient/day hospital setting [105].
It is recommended during the withdrawal period of abused medication(s) in patients with medication-overuse headache (MOH) to treat "rebound headache" and other withdrawal symptoms (detoxification therapy orally or parenterally) [63, 105].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended for the treatment of withdrawal headache, other withdrawal symptoms, and for aborting potential migraine attacks as first-line drugs to use systemic corticosteroids, NSAIDs, antiemetics, and anxiolytics (Table 9) [120–127, 129, 130].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Table 9. Medicines recommended for the treatment of withdrawal headache in patients with MOH
Medications | Doses (single/daily) and route of administration | Comment | Link to study |
|---|---|---|---|
#Prednisolone** | 100 mg or 1 mg per kg of body weight (average 60 mg daily) | There are 2 regimens: 100 mg for 5 days or 60 mg with a gradual dose reduction by 5–10 mg every 3 days for 1–2 weeks until discontinuation | 120, 121, 126, 129,130 |
#Methylprednisolone** | 500 mg intravenously or 125 mg in 250.0 ml of sodium chloride solution** combined with #diazepam** 10 mg and #esomeprazole** 40 mg intravenous infusion once daily for 5 days | - | 122, 123 |
#Dexamethasone** | 8 mg in sodium chloride solution** intravenous infusion once daily for 5 days | Dexamethasone** prevents the recurrence of a migraine attack as part of combination therapy with diazepam 5–15 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg | 124 |
#Celecoxib | 400 mg daily orally for 5 days, then tapering by 100 mg every 5 days | - | 127 |
#Metoclopramide** | 10 mg once daily orally or intramuscularly for 5–7 days | For vomiting | 124, 125 |
#Diazepam** | 5–15 mg in 250.0 ml of sodium chloride solution** intravenous infusion once daily for 5 days | In combination with #methylprednisolone** 125–500 mg or #dexamethasone** 8 mg and metoclopramide** 10 mg | 123, 124 |
Comments: treatment of headache and other withdrawal symptoms (detoxification) should be carried out during the first two weeks of the withdrawal period. The choice of drugs is determined by clinical manifestations (e.g., in the presence of vomiting, the use of antiemetic drugs is advisable) [128].
During the withdrawal of analgesic medications, alternative pharmacological agents with analgesic properties may include classes of drugs that the patient has not previously abused (e.g., in a patient with frequent episodic or chronic migraine and MOH associated with the abuse of medications containing components from different classes with analgesic properties, selective 5-HT1 serotonin receptor agonists [triptans] may be recommended for aborting migraine attacks during the withdrawal period. Celecoxib and naproxen [see below] may also be used during the withdrawal period as alternative analgesic drugs provided the patient has not previously abused them).
When prescribing systemic corticosteroids or NSAIDs, proton pump inhibitors must be added to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal adverse events. Patients abusing opioids, benzodiazepine derivatives, or barbiturates require monitoring of blood metabolic parameters, blood pressure, and rehydration [including abundant fluid intake].
It is recommended for the preventive treatment of frequent episodic and chronic migraine combined with MOH to use topiramate**, botulinum toxin type A – hemagglutinin complex**, and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway antagonists (Table 10).
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: preventive therapy for migraine combined with MOH is preferably initiated simultaneously with the withdrawal of the medication[s] that caused MOH and the treatment of withdrawal headache [119], although therapy can also be initiated prior to the withdrawal of the "offending" analgesics and antipyretics [107, 110, 112, 113].
Table 10. Drugs recommended for the preventive treatment of frequent episodic and chronic migraine combined with MOH
Drug | Dose, route of administration | Comments | Study links |
|---|---|---|---|
Topiramate** | 100 mg daily orally | Possible daily dose range 50–200 mg. Titration starting at 25 mg daily with an increase of 25 mg per week | 106, 107 |
Botulinum toxin type A – hemagglutinin complex** | Injections of 155–195 Units according to the PREEMPT protocol | 108, 109, 110, 131, 132 | |
Fremanezumab | 225 mg subcutaneously once a month or 675 mg subcutaneously once every 3 months (4 times a year) | RCTs have confirmed the efficacy of mAbs in patients with migraine and MOH after previous failed attempts to prescribe 3–4 classes of drugs for migraine preventive therapy (i.e., in refractory migraine) | 111, 112 |
Erenumab | 70–140 mg subcutaneously once a month | 113 |
3.5 Non-pharmacological treatment
It is recommended to combine pharmacological migraine treatment with non-pharmacological methods to increase therapeutic efficacy [20, 33].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: combined treatment can be considered as a viable treatment option for primary headache, including in patients resistant to pharmacological treatment [134, 135].
It is recommended for patients with comorbid psychiatric (anxiety-depressive and somatoform) disorders to undergo individual cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), psychotherapy, and psychological relaxation methods (A13.29.008 Psychotherapy), selected during an initial (B01.034.001) or follow-up (B01.034.002) appointment/consultation with a psychotherapist [136].
GoR ALoE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
Comments: classic CBT includes two methods: behavioral (aimed at patient activation, individual prevention of migraine attacks, and coping skills) and cognitive (includes working with negative thoughts and misconceptions about the disease, as well as reducing pain catastrophizing) [137–141].
It is recommended to perform neuropsychological rehabilitation using biofeedback (BFB) based on heart rate and electromyography of the scalp and neck muscles to train psychological and muscular relaxation (A19.23.003.014 Electromyographic biofeedback training for central nervous system and brain disorders) [142].
LEr AQoE 2Level of recommendation validity – A (level of evidence – 2).
Comments: biofeedback can be recommended as an alternative effective non-pharmacological treatment for patients with chronic migraine for long-term prevention of migraine attacks. BFB combined with home relaxation training is more effective than without it [143].
It is recommended for patients with migraine to use reflexology for central nervous system disorders (acupuncture) as an adjunctive preventive treatment method (A21.23.002 Reflexology for central nervous system disorders, A21.24.002 Reflexology for peripheral nervous system disorders, A17.01.002 Stimulation of acupuncture points by other physical factors) [144–146].
GCR BLEL 1Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 1).
Comments: reflexology can be considered an effective and safe treatment option, as no side effects are noted with its use [144–146].
It is recommended for patients with pronounced pericranial muscle dysfunction (muscular-tonic syndrome) to undergo post-isometric relaxation to achieve muscle relaxation [147].
GCP ALoE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
It is recommended for patients with migraine to engage in therapeutic exercise to increase the efficacy of preventive therapy (A19.23.002 Therapeutic exercise for central nervous system and brain disorders, A19.24.001 Therapeutic exercise for peripheral nervous system disorders, A19.23.002.015 Group therapeutic exercise class for central nervous system and brain disorders) [148].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: light-intensity exercises are indicated for patients with migraine; endurance training, such as on a treadmill or stationary bicycle; Nordic walking; general physical exercises; relaxation and functional training. Number of training sessions: maximum 3–4 times a week; session duration: from 20 to 60 minutes [149].
It is recommended for patients with migraine as an adjunctive treatment method (in combination with other non-pharmacological methods and pharmacotherapy) greater occipital nerve blocks using systemic corticosteroids and local anesthetics (A11.24.001 Administration of medications into the peripheral nerve area) [151].
LoR CLE 2Level of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: greater occipital nerve block can be an effective acute treatment for a migraine attack and may be effective in the short term for chronic migraine [150].
It is recommended to use non-invasive high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) (A17.23.004.001 Transcranial magnetic stimulation) as an additional method of preventive treatment for migraine, including chronic migraine [152 - 155].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: the effect of high-frequency repetitive rTMS in migraine is associated with a neuromodulatory effect on cortical hyperexcitability, which is one of the basic pathophysiological mechanisms of migraine [154 - 155].
It is recommended to use external non-invasive electrical stimulation of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve (A17.30.006 Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (PENS)) for the relief of headache attacks and the prevention of migraine [156, 157].
GRL ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is recommended to use invasive greater occipital nerve (GON) neurostimulation (NS) for the treatment of refractory chronic migraine (resistant to adequate preventive therapy) [161 - 163].
GCR ALEL 2Grade of Recommendations — A (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: the efficacy of NS in chronic migraine / refractory chronic migraine is associated with its action on the trigeminocervical complex and the mediated inhibition of the pathological activity of pain structures in the brain [157]. It has been shown that NS reduces the frequency and severity of migraine attacks, decreases the amount of medication consumed, and improves the patients' quality of life [159, 160.]. Referral of patients for invasive NS should be carried out jointly by a headache specialist and a neurosurgeon.
It is not recommended to use diet therapy for the preventive treatment of migraine [5, 6, 8, 10].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: although diet therapy is not used to treat migraine, it is advisable to advise patients to exclude certain foods from their diet that can potentially trigger a migraine attack (chocolate, bananas, nuts, citrus fruits, high-fat cheeses, alcohol) [1, 2, 3, 9] as part of primary (B04.070.003) or follow-up (B04.070.004) individual in-depth preventive counseling on the correction of risk factors for non-communicable diseases during the initial (B01.023.001) and/or follow-up (B01.023.002) appointment (examination, consultation) with a neurologist, based on A01.23.001 Collection of anamnesis and complaints in central nervous system and brain pathology.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
Rehabilitation measures aimed at improving the functioning and quality of life of a patient suffering from migraine are recommended [2, 9, 15, 20].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: rehabilitation measures may include post-isometric relaxation, therapeutic exercise (A19.23.002 Therapeutic exercise for central nervous system and brain diseases; A19.23.002.001 Therapeutic exercise for central nervous system and brain diseases in a swimming pool; A19.23.002.025 Therapeutic exercise using apparatuses and simulators for central nervous system and brain diseases; A19.24.001 Therapeutic exercise for peripheral nervous system diseases), breathing exercises, massage (A21.01.003 Medical neck massage; A21.01.003.001 Collar zone massage; A21.03.007 Medical back massage), reflexology (A21.23.002 Reflexology for central nervous system diseases; A21.24.002 Reflexology for peripheral nervous system diseases; A17.01.002 Stimulation of acupuncture points with other physical factors), posture correction, and workplace ergonomics training.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
It is recommended to provide dynamic follow-up for all patients with migraine [2, 9, 15, 20].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: to prevent an increase in the frequency of migraine attacks, patients should be educated about the role of migraine triggers and the need to avoid them. To prevent the chronification of the disease, it is necessary to explain the role of migraine chronification factors (stress, depression, medication overuse, excessive caffeine intake, obesity, sleep apnea syndrome) and the need for lifestyle modification. It is necessary to monitor the efficacy and tolerability of preventive therapy, as well as adherence to the regimen and rules of drug administration. To ensure such monitoring, communication with the patient is required throughout the entire treatment period, including via telephone consultations. Educational work can be carried out by general practitioners and neurologists whom patients with migraine consult.
6. Organization of Medical Care
Indications for emergency hospitalization of a patient in the neurological department:
Headache accompanied by altered consciousness;
Headache accompanied by fever and meningeal signs;
Headache with progressive focal neurological symptoms;
Headache with progressive general cerebral symptoms;
Thunderclap headache;
Status migrainosus.
Indications for elective hospitalization of a patient in the neurological department:
Progressive headache;
Refractory headache;
Severe medication-overuse headache associated with the excessive use of opioids, antispasmodics, psychotropic drugs, and combination analgesics;
Atypical aura lasting more than 1 hour;
Indications for discharging patients from the neurological department:
Abortion of headache;
Reduction of headache to 3 - 4 points on the visual analogue scale;
Successful replacement of the overused drug with adequate analgesic drug therapy.
7. Additional Information
In routine clinical practice, migraine is poorly diagnosed [9, 15]; in the Russian Federation, patients presenting with a headache are often given erroneous diagnoses, which determines the choice of incorrect treatment tactics and may contribute to the progression (chronification) of the disease. Examples of erroneous diagnoses:
dyscirculatory encephalopathy with cephalgic syndrome;
cervical spine osteoarthrosis with migrainous paroxysms;
vegetative-vascular dystonia with cephalgic syndrome;
cervicogenic headache;
headache associated with arterial hypertension.
Erroneous diagnoses are usually the result of misinterpreting non-specific findings on instrumental studies as signs of organic brain or cerebral vascular lesions [2, 9, 15]. For example, a minor decrease in linear blood flow velocity in craniovertebral arteries on Doppler ultrasonography serves as the basis for the incorrect diagnosis of "dyscirculatory encephalopathy" or "chronic cerebral ischemia," while degenerative changes in the cervical spine serve as the basis for the diagnosis of "cervical spine osteoarthrosis with cephalgic syndrome" or "cervicogenic headache." Making an incorrect diagnosis leads to the choice of inadequate treatment (e.g., psychostimulants and nootropics), which does not improve the course of migraine, but rather contributes to its chronification.
7.1 Assessment of therapeutic efficacy
It is recommended to consider preventive treatment of migraine effective if the number of headache days is reduced by 50% or more from baseline after 3 months of therapy [9, 15, 20, 76]. The assessment of the efficacy of preventive therapy is based on collecting complaints and the history of the disease (A01.23.001 Collection of anamnesis and complaints in central nervous system and brain pathology) and is carried out after 3 months at a follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) with a neurologist (B01.023.002).
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: additional efficacy criteria include a reduction in the use of pain-relieving medications and the severity of cognitive impairment (improved mood, reduced anxiety, normalized sleep), as well as improved working capacity, level of social adaptation, and overall quality of life of the migraine patient.
It is recommended to refer patients in whom no clinical improvement has been achieved, as well as patients with severe migraine (chronic migraine, multiple comorbid disorders, concomitant medication-overuse headache), to a specialized pain clinic/headache center for further treatment and follow-up [2, 6, 8, 10, 20].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
Quality criteria for specialized medical care for adults with migraine [2, 18, 20, 76].
№ | Quality criterion | Performance |
|---|---|---|
Diagnosis of migraine | ||
1 | Inquiry regarding the clinical manifestations, course, and triggers of the headache was performed | YES/NO |
2 | A neurological status examination was performed. | YES/NO |
3 | Laboratory tests were performed in case of an atypical clinical picture of migraine with at least one warning symptom indicating the presence of another disease that may be the cause of the headache and/or complications of migraine (red flag symptoms): B03.016.002 General clinical blood count, B03.016.001 Complex of studies for the evaluation of systemic inflammatory reactions, B03.005.006 Coagulogram (screening assessment of the hemostasis system) | YES/NO |
4 | Instrumental studies were performed in rare forms of migraine with aura and complications of migraine to rule out organic pathology of the brain and/or cerebral vessels (aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, carotid artery dissection), which include: A05.23.009 Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, A05.12.007 Magnetic resonance angiography (one region), A05.12.006 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (one region), A05.12.005 Magnetic resonance venography (one region) | YES/NO |
5 | Instrumental studies and specialist consultations were performed for patients with an atypical course of migraine or presenting with at least one red flag symptom indicating another underlying condition that could cause headache (Table 5), including: A05.23.009 Brain MRI, A05.12.007 Magnetic resonance angiography (one region), A05.12.006 Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (one region), A05.12.005 Magnetic resonance venography (one region), as well as consultations with related specialists when necessary (B01.029.001 initial ophthalmologist appointment (examination, consultation), including taking anamnesis and complaints in eye pathology (A01.26.001), B01.028.001 initial otorhinolaryngologist appointment (examination, consultation), B01.034.001 initial psychotherapist appointment (examination, consultation)) | YES/NO |
6 | In the absence of red flag symptoms and with a typical clinical presentation, the diagnosis was made in accordance with ICHD-3 criteria (migraine form) | YES/NO |
7 | Clinical diagnosis of major comorbid disorders was performed: depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, sleep disturbance, other pain syndromes. | YES/NO |
8 | In patients with frequent episodic migraine (10–14 headache days per month) or chronic migraine (15 or more days per month), clinical diagnosis of medication-overuse headache (MOH) was performed in accordance with ICHD-3 criteria, and a diagnosis of combined headache was established: migraine and MOH | YES/NO |
9 | Differential diagnosis of migraine was performed | YES/NO |
Migraine treatment | ||
10 | Behavioral therapy was conducted: mechanisms of development, triggering factors, and risk factors for migraine chronification were briefly explained | YES/NO |
11 | Recommendations were given on the acute treatment of migraine attacks with appropriate analgesic medications: NSAIDs, selective serotonin 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans) | YES/NO |
12 | Patients with frequent episodic and chronic migraine were prescribed prophylactic therapy with one or more classes of drugs with evidence-based efficacy in migraine prevention: beta-blockers, antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs, candesartan, naproxen, botulinum toxin type A - hemagglutinin complex**, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists | YES/NO |
13 | For patients with frequent episodic and chronic migraine, prophylactic therapy is recommended for a duration of at least 6 months | YES/NO |
14 | In patients with migraine combined with medication-overuse headache (MOH), behavioral therapy was conducted: advice was given on the need for a significant reduction in intake or temporary discontinuation of analgesic medications | YES/NO |
15 | In patients with migraine combined with medication-overuse headache (MOH), full or partial withdrawal of the overuse medication(s) was performed | YES/NO |
16 | During the withdrawal period of the overuse medication(s), patients with MOH received treatment for "rebound headache" and other withdrawal symptoms (oral or parenteral detoxification therapy) | YES/NO |
17 | Patients with migraine combined with medication-overuse headache (MOH) were prescribed appropriate migraine prophylactic therapy: topiramate**, botulinum toxin type A - hemagglutinin complex**, calcitonin gene-related peptide antagonists | YES/NO |
18 | Patients with frequent episodic and chronic migraine were prescribed accessible and appropriate non-pharmacological treatments for migraine | YES/NO |
References
Show references
Amelin AV, Ignatov YuD, Skoromets AA, Sokolov AYu. Migren (patogenez, klinika, lechenie) [Migraine (pathogenesis, clinical presentation, treatment)]. Moscow: MEDpress; 2011. 265 p.
Osipova VV, Tabeeva GR. Pervichnye golovnye boli: diagnostika, klinika, terapiya: Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo [Primary headaches: diagnostics, clinical presentation, therapy: A practical guide]. Moscow: Meditsinskoe informatsionnoe agentstvo LLC; 2014. 336 p.
Tabeeva GR, Yakhno NN. Migren [Migraine]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2011. 622 p.
Sergeev AV, Tabeeva GR, Azimova YuE. Central neuronal hyperexcitability as a predisposition to migraine. Russian Journal of Pain. 2010;2(27):3-11.
Rasmussen B.K., Jensen R., Schroll M., Olesen J. Epidemiology of headache in a general population — a prevalence study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991;44:1147–1157.
Ayzenberg I., Katsarava Z., Sborowski A. et al. The prevalence of primary headache disorders in Russia: A countrywide survey. Cephalalgia. 2012;32(5):373–381.
Lebedeva ER, Kobzeva NR, Gilev DV, Olesen J. Analysis of the quality of diagnosis and treatment of primary headaches in various social groups of the Ural region. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2015;1:19-26.
The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (ICHD-3). Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1-211.
Osipova VV. Migraine and tension-type headache. In: Clinical Guidelines. Neurology and Neurosurgery. Ed. by E.I. Gusev, A.N. Konovalov. 2nd ed., rev. and supp. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2015; 424 p.
Li D., Christensen A.F., Olesen J. Field-testing of the ICHD-3 beta/proposed ICD-11 diagnostic criteria for migraine with aura. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(9):748-756.
Lebedeva E.R., Gurary N.M., Gilev D.V., Olesen J. Prospective testing of ICHD-3 beta diagnostic criteria for migraine with aura and migraine with typical aura in patients with transient ischemic attacks. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(3):561-567.
Lebedeva E.R., Gurary N.M., Gilev D.V.et al. Explicit diagnostic criteria for transient ischemic attacks to differentiate it from migraine with aura. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(8):1463-1470.
Ekusheva EV, Karpova MI, Osipova VV. Hormonal contraceptives and the risk of ischemic stroke in women with migraine: a new international consensus. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2019;11(3):11-15.
Artemenko AR, Kurenkov AL, Belomestova KV. Classification, diagnosis and treatment of chronic migraine: review of new data. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2013;11:91-96.
Osipova VV, Filatova EG, Artemenko AR, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of migraine: recommendations of Russian experts. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2017;2:28-42.
Westergaard M.L., Hansen E.H., Glümer C. et al. Definitions of medication-overuse headache in population-based studies and their implications on prevalence estimates: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2014;34(6):409-425.
Zeeberg P., Olesen J., Jensen R. Medication overuse headache and chronic migraine in a specialized headache centre: field-testing proposed new appendix criteria. Cephalalgia. 2009;29(2):214-220.
Steiner T.J., MacGregor E.A., Davies P.T.G. Guidelines for all healthcare professionals in the diagnosis and management of migraine, tension-type, cluster and medication overuse headache. British Association for the Study of Headache, 3rdedn. 2007.
Tepper S.J., Dahlöf C.G., Dowson A. et al. Prevalence and diagnosis of migraine in patients consulting their physician with a complaint of headache: data from the Landmark Study. Headache. 2004;44(9):856-864.
Reference programme: Diagnosis and treatment of headache disorders and facial pain. Danish Headache Society, 2nd Edition, 2012. J. Headache Pain. 2012;13:S1–S29.
Lipton R.B., Serrano D., Buse D.C. et al. Improving the detection of chronic migraine: Development and validation of Identify Chronic Migraine (ID-CM). Cephalalgia. 2016;36(3):203-215.
Jiang H., Deng Y., Zhang Y. et al. Field testing of the ICHD-3β and expert opinion criteria for chronic migraine. J. Headache Pain. 2016;17(1):85.
Lampl C., Buzath A., Yazdi K., Sandor P.S. Ergot and triptan overuse in Austria—an evaluation of clinical data and cost. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:807–811.
Mitsikostas D., Ashina M., Craven A. et al. EHF committee. European headache federation consensus on technical investigation for primary headache disorders. J. Headache Pain. 2015;17:5.
Kamtchum-Tatuene J. et al. Neuroimaging findings in headache with normal neurologic examination: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2020;416:116997.
Kruit M.C., van Buchem M.A., Launer L.J. et al. Migraine is associated with an increased risk of deep white matter lesions, subclinical posterior circulation infarcts and brain iron accumulation: the population-based MRI CAMERA study. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(2):129-36.
Ekusheva EV. Mnogolikaya zhenskaya migren [The multifaceted female migraine]. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2019. 96 p.
Mett A., Tfelt-Hansen P. Acute migraine therapy: recent evidence from randomized comparative trials. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2008; 21(3):331-337.
Orr S.L., Aube´ M., Becker W.J. et al. Canadian Headache Society systematic review and recommendations on the treatment of migraine pain in emergency settings. Cephalalgia. 2015;35:271.
Kirthi V., Derry S., Moore R. Aspirin with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;4:CD008041.
Lampl C., Voelker M., Diener H.C. Efficacy and safety of 1,000 mg effervescent aspirin: individual patient data meta-analysis of three trials in migraine headache and migraine accompanying symptoms. J. Neurol. 2007;254(6):705-712.
Rabbie R, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Ibuprofen with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD008039.
Rabbie R., Derry S., Moore R.A. Ibuprofen with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;4:CD008039.
Goldstein J, Silberstein S.D Saper J.R. Acetaminophen, Aspirin, and Caffeine in Combination Versus Ibuprofen for Acute Migraine: Results From a Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Single-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Study. Headache 2006;46:444-453.
Law S., Derry S., Moore R.A. Naproxen with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;10: CD009455.
Derry S., Rabbie R., Moore R.A. Diclofenac with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;4: CD008783.
Derry S., Moore R.A. Paracetamol (acetaminophen) with or without an antiemetic for acute migraine headaches in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;4: CD008040.
Diener H.C., Montagna P., Gacs G. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of diclofenac potassium sachets in migraine: A randomized, double-blind, cross-over study in comparison with diclofenac potassium tablets and placebo. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:537-547.
Colman I., Brown M.D., Innes G.D. et al. Parenteral metoclopramide for acute migraine: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2004;329(7479): 369-1373.
Turkcuer I., Serinken M., Eken C. et al. Intravenous paracetamol versus dexketoprofen in acute migraine attack in the emergency department: A randomised clinical trial. Emerg. Med. J. 2014;31:182-185.
Taggart E, Doran S, Kokotillo A, Campbell S, Villa-Roel C, Rowe BH. Ketorolac in the treatment of acute migraine: a systematic review. Headache. 2013;53(2):277-87.
Dib M, Massiou H, Weber M, Henry P, Garcia-Acosta S, Bousser MG; Bi-Profenid Migraine Study Group. Efficacy of oral ketoprofen in acute migraine: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Neurology. 200 ;58(11):1660-5.
Friedman B.W., Mulvey L., Esses D. et al. Metoclopramide for acute migraine: a dose finding randomized clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;57(5):475-482.
Friedman B.W., Garber L., Yoon A. et al. Randomized trial of IV valproate vs metoclopramide vs ketorolac for acute migraine. Neurology. 2014;82:976-983.
Kellstein D.E., Lipton R.B., Geetha R. et al. Evaluation of a novel solubilized formulation of ibuprofen in the treatment of migraine headache: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. Cephalalgia. 2000;20:233-243.
Cameron C., Kelly S., Hsieh S.C. et al. Triptans in the Acute Treatment of Migraine: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Headache. 2015;55(Suppl 4):221-235.
Ferrari M.D., Goadsby P.J., Roon K.I., Lipton R.B. Triptans (serotonin, 5-HT1B/1D agonists) in migraine: detailed results and methods of a meta-analysis of 53 trials. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:633-658.
Dodick D, Brandes J, Elkind A, Mathew N, Rodichok L. Speed of onset, efficacy and tolerability of zolmitriptan nasal spray in the acute treatment of migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. CNS Drugs. 2005;19(2):125-36.
Pascual J., Mateos V., Roig C. et al. Marketed oral triptans in the acute treatment of migraine: A systematic review on efficacy and tolerability. Headache. 2007;47:1152-1168.
Thorlund K., Mills E.J., Wu P. et al. Comparative efficacy of triptans for the abortive treatment of migraine: A multiple treatment comparison meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. 2014;34:258-267.
Derry C.J., Derry S., Moore R.A. Sumatriptan (oral route of administration) for acute migraine attacks in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012:CD008615.
Smith LA., Oldman A.D., McQuay H.J., Moore R.A. Eletriptan for acute migraine. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2001: CD003224.
Cady R.K., Sheftell F., Lipton R.B. et al. Effect of early intervention with sumatriptan on migraine pain: retrospective analyses of data from three clinical trials. Clin. Ther. 2000;22(9):1035-1048.
Cady RK, Martin VT, Géraud G, Rodgers A, Zhang Y, Ho AP, Hustad CM, Ho TP, Connor KM, Ramsey KE. Rizatriptan 10-mg ODT for early treatment of migraine and impact of migraine education on treatment response. Headache. 2009;49(5):687-96.
Filatova EG, Amelin AV, Tabeeva GR, et al. Ready - the first Russian multicenter study of the efficacy of Relpax (eletriptan) in the treatment of migraine. Lechenie nervnykh bolezney. 2006;2:19-22.
Bigal M.E., Bordini C.A., Speciali J.G. Intravenous chlorpromazine in the emergency department treatment of migraines: a randomized controlled trial. J. Emerg. Med. 2002;23(2):141-148.
Cameron J.D., Lane P.L., Speechley M. Intravenous chlorpromazine vs intravenous metoclopramide in acute migraine headache. Acad. Emerg. Med. 1995; 2(7): 597-602.
Gungor F., Akyol K.C., Kesapli M. et al. Intravenous dexketoprofen vs placebo for migraine attack in the emergency department: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Cephalalgia. 2016;36:179-184.
Bigal M.E., Bordini C.A., Tepper S.J. et al. Intravenous magnesium sulphate in the acute treatment of migraine without aura and migraine with aura: A randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2002;22:345-353.
Corbo J., Esses D., Bijur P.E. et al. Randomized clinical trial of intravenous magnesium sulfate as an adjunctive medication for emergency department treatment of migraine headache. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2001;38:621-627.
Cete Y., Dora B., Ertan C. et al. A randomized prospective placebo-controlled study of intravenous magnesium sulphate vs. metoclopramide in the management of acute migraine attacks in the emergency department. Cephalalgia. 2005;25:199-204.
Leniger T., Pageler L., Stude P., Diener H.C., Limmroth V. Comparison of intravenous valproate with intravenous lysine-acetylsalicylic acid in acute migraine attacks. Headache. 2005;45:42-46.
Diener HC, Antonaci F, Braschinsky M, Evers S, Jensen R, Lainez M, Kristoffersen ES, Tassorelli C, Ryliskiene K, Petersen JA. European Academy of Neurology guideline on the management of medication-overuse headache. Eur J Neurol. 2020;27(7):1102-1116.
Woldeamanuel Y.W., Rapoport A.M., Cowan R.P. The place of corticosteroids in migraine attack management: a 65-year systematic review with pooled analysis and critical appraisal. Cephalalgia. 2015;35(11):996–1024.
Friedman B.W., Greenwald P., Bania T.C. et al. Randomized trial of IV dexamethasone for acute migraine in the emergency department. Neurology. 2007;69:2038–2044.
Colman I., Friedman B.W., Brown M.D. et al. Parenteral dexamethasone for acute severe migraine headache: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials for preventing recurrence. BMJ. 2008; 336: 1359-1361.
Neill A., Brannigan D. Towards evidence-based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 2: Dexamethasone for reduction of migraine recurrence. Emerg. Med. J. 2013;30:165-166.
Huang Y., Cai X., Song X. et al. Steroids for preventing recurrence of acute severe migraine headaches: A metaanalysis. Eur. J. Neurol. 2013; 20: 1184–1190.
Wang S.J., Silberstein S.D., Young W.B. Droperidol treatment of status migrainosus and refractory migraine. Headache. 1997;37:377-382.
Silberstein S.D., Young W.B., Mendizabal J.E. et al. Acute migraine treatment with droperidol: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 2003;60(2):315-321.
Honkaniemi J., Liimatainen S., Rainesalo S. et al. Haloperidol in the acute treatment of migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Headache. 2006;46(5):781-787.
Gaffigan M.E., Bruner D.I., Wason C. et al. A randomized controlled trial of intravenous haloperidol vs. intravenous metoclopramide for acute migraine therapy in the emergency department. J Emerg Med. 2015;49:326.
Balbin JEB., Nerenberg R., Baratloo A. Intravenous fluids for migraine: a post hoc analysis of clinical trial data. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2016;34:713–716
Silberstein SD. Preventive migraine treatment. Continuum (MinneapMinn). 2015; 21(4 Headache):973–989.
Jackson J.L., Cogbill E., Santana-Davila R. et al. Comparative effectiveness meta-analysis of drugs for the pophylaxis of migraine headache. PLoS One. 2015; 10(7): e0130733.
He A., Song D., Zhang L., Li C. Unveiling the relative efficacy, safety and tolerability of prophylactic medications for migraine: pairwise and network-meta analysis. J. Headache Pain. 2017;18(1):26.
Silberstein S., Tfelt-Hansen P., Dodick D.W. et al. Guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia. 2008;28: 484-495.
Silva-Néto R.P., Almeida K.J., Bernardino S.N. Analysis of the duration of migraine prophylaxis. J Neurol Sci. 2014;337(1-2):38-41.
Linde K, Rossnagel K. Propranolol for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane Database SystRev. 2017;2(2):CD003225.
Kangasniemi P., Hedman C. Metoprolol and propranolol in the prophylactic treatment of classical and common migraine. A double-blind study. Cephalalgia. 1984;4:91-96.
Chronicle E.P., Mulleners W.M. Anticonvulsant drugs for migraine prophylaxis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016; 5: CD003226.
Linde M., Mulleners W.M., Chronicle E.P. et al. Valproate (valproic acid or sodium valproate or a combination of the two) for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2013;6:CD010611.
Bussone G., Diener H.C., Pfeil J.et al. Topiramate 100 mg/day in migraine prevention: a pooled analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2005; 59: 961-968.
Silberstein S.D., Lipton R.B., Dodick D.W. et al. Efficacy and safety of topiramate for the treatment of chronic migraine: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Headache. 2007;47:170-180.
Herd C.P., Tomlinson C.L., Rick C. et al. Botulinum toxins for the prevention of migraine in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018; 6: CD011616
Dodick D.W., Ashina M., Brandes J.L.et al. ARISE: a phase 3 randomized trial of erenumab for episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2018; 38:1026–1037.
Dodick DW et al. Effect of Fremanezumab Compared With Placebo for Prevention of Episodic Migraine A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319(19):1999-2008.
Tepper S., Ashina M., Reuter U.et al. Safety and efficacy of erenumab for preventive treatment of chronic migraine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16:425–434.
Bigal M. et al. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of TEV-48125 for preventive treatment of high-frequency episodic migraine: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b study. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:1081–90.
Jackson J.L., Shimeall W., Sessums L., et al. Tricyclic antidepressants and headaches: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;341:c5222.
Xu X.M., Yang C., Liu Y. et al. Efficacy and feasibility of antidepressants for the prevention of migraine in adults: a meta-analysis. Eur J Neurol. 2017;24(8):1022-1031.
Bulut S., Berilgen M.S., Baran A. et al. Venlafaxine versus amitriptyline in the prophylactic treatment of migraine: randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2004;107:44-48.
Ozyalcin S.N., Talu G.K., Kiziltan E. et al. The efficacy and safety of venlafaxine in the prophylaxis of migraine. Headache. 2005;45:144-152.
Tronvik E., Stovner L.J., Helde G. et al. Prophylactic treatment of migraine with an angiotensin II receptor blocker: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;289:65-69.
Stovner L.J., Linde M., Gravdahl G.B. et al. A comparative study of candesartan versus propranolol for migraine prophylaxis: A randomised, triple-blind, placebo-controlled, double cross-over study. Cephalalgia. 2014;34(7):523-32.
Kindelan-Calvo P., Gil-Martínez A., Paris-Alemany A. et al. Effectiveness of therapeutic patient education for adults with migraine. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pain Med. 2014;15(9):1619-1636.
Johannsson V, Nilsson LR, Widelius T, Jäverfalk T, Hellman P, Akesson JA, Olerud B, Gustafsson CL, Raak A, Sandahl G, et al. Atenolol in migraine prophylaxis a double-blind cross-over multicentre study. Headache. 1987;27(7):372-4.
Diener H.C., Bussone G., Van Oene J.C. et al. TOPMAT-MIG-201(TOP-CHROME) Study Group. Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2007;27(7):814-23.
Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, Aurora SK, Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Diener HC, Brin MF; PREEMPT Chronic Migraine Study Group. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache. 2010;50(6):921-936.
Artemenko AR, Abramov VG, Konovalova ZN, Korenko AN, Kurenkov AL, Latysheva NV, Naprienko MV, Orlova OR, Filatova EG, Shevchenko VS, Yakovleva PN. Botulinum toxin type A (Relatox) in the treatment of chronic migraine in adults: results of a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, comparative phase IIIb study. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;123(5):89–99.
Fritsche G, Frettloh J, Huppe M. et al. Prevention of medication overuse in patients with migraine. Pain. 2010;151:404–413.
Limmroth V., Biondi D., Pfeil J. et al. Topiramate in patients with episodic migraine: reducing the risk for chronic forms of headache. Headache. 2007;47:13–21.
Rossi P., Di Lorenzo C., Faroni J. et al. Advice alone vs. structured detoxification programmes for medication overuse headache: a prospective, randomized, open-label trial in transformed migraine patients with low medical needs. Cephalalgia. 2006;26 1097–1105.
de Goffau M.J., Klaver A.R., Willemsen M.G. et al. The effectiveness of treatments for patients with medication overuse headache; A systematicreview and meta-analysis. J Pain. 2017;18:615–627.
Hagen K., Albretsen C., Vilming S.T. et al. Complete detoxification is the most effective treatment of medication-overuse headache: a randomized controlled open-label trial. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:225-236.
Diener HC, Bussone G, Van Oene JC, et al. Topiramate reduces headache days in chronic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2007;27: 14–823.
Silberstein S.D., Lipton R.B., Dodick D.W. et al. Efficacy and safety of topiramate for the treatment of chronic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Headache. 2007;47:170–180
Silberstein S.D., Blumenfeld A.M., Cady R.K. et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: PREEMPT 24-week pooled subgroup analysis of patients who had acute headache medication overuse at baseline. J Neurol Sci. 2013;331:48–56.
Sandrini G., Perrotta A., Tassorelli C. et al. Botulinumtoxin type-A in the prophylactic treatment of medication-overuse headache: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. J Headache Pain. 2011;12:427–433.
Negro A., Curto M., Lionetto L., Martelletti P. A two years open-label prospective study of OnabotulinumtoxinA. 195 U in medication overuse headache: a real-world experience.J Headache Pain. 2015;17:1.
Silberstein S.D.,Ashina S., Katsarava Z. et al. The impact of fremanezumab on medication overuse in patients with chronic migraine. Headache. 2018;58:76–77.
Pazdera L., Ning X., Campos V.R. et al. Efficacy of fremanezumab in patients with migraine and documented inadequate response to 3 or 4 migraine preventive medication classes and medication overuse in the international, multicenter, randomized placebo-controlled FOCUS study. Poster, 14th European Headache Federation Congress, 2020.
Tepper S.J., Diener H.C., Ashina M. et al. Erenumab in chronic migraine with medication overuse: subgroup analysis of a randomized trial. Neurology. 2019;92:e2309–e2320.
Tassorelli C., Jensen R., Allena M. et al. A consensus protocol for the management of medication-overuse headache: Evaluation in a multicentric, multinational study. Cephalalgia. 2014;34:645–655.
Trucco M., Meineri P., Ruiz L., Gionco M. Medication overuse headache: withdrawal and prophylactic therapeutic regimen. Headache. 2010 50:989–997.
Zeeberg P., Olesen J., Jensen R. Efficacy of multidisciplinary treatment in a tertiary referral headache centre. Cephalalgia. 2005;25:1159–1167.
Zeeberg P., Olesen J., Jensen R. Discontinuation of medication overuse in headache patients: recovery of therapeutic responsiveness. Cephalalgia. 2006;26:1192–1198.
Munksgaard S.B., Bendtsen L., Jensen R.H. Detoxification of medication-overuse headache by a multidisciplinary treatment programme is highly effective: acomparison of two consecutive treatment methods in an open-label design. Cephalalgia. 2012; 32: 834–844.
Carlsen L.N., Munksgaard S.B., Jensen R.H.et al. Complete detoxification is the most effective treatment of medication-overuse headache: A randomized controlled open-label trial. Cephalalgia. 2018; 38: 225–236.
Pageler L., Katsarava Z., Diener H.C. et al. Prednisone vs. placebo in withdrawal therapy following medication overuse headache. Cephalalgia. 2008; 28: 152-156.
Krymchantowski AV, Barbosa JS. Prednisone as initial treatment of analgesic induced daily headache. Cephalalgia. 2000; 20:107–13.
Cevoli S., Giannini G., Favoni V. et al. Treatment of withdrawal headache in patients with medication overuse headache: a pilot study. J Headache Pain. 2017;18(1):56.
Paolucci M., Altamura C., Brunelli N. et al. Methylprednisolone plus diazepam i.v. as bridge therapy for medication overuse headache. Neurol Sci. 2017;38(11):2025-2029.
Trucco M., Meineri P., Ruiz L. "Gruppo Neurologico Ospedaliero Interregionale per lo Studio delleCefalee" (Neurological Hospital Interregional Group for the Study of Headache). Preliminary results of a withdrawal and detoxification therapeutic regimen in patients with probable chronic migraine and probable medication overuse headache. J Headache Pain. 2005;6(4):334-337.
Tassorelli C., Jensen R., Allena M. et al. A consensus protocol for the management of medication-overuse headache: Evaluation in a multicentric, multinational study. Cephalalgia. 2014; 34: 645–655.
Fiesseler F.W., Shih R., Szucs P. et al. Steroids for migraine headaches: a randomized double-blind, twoarmed, placebo-controlled trial. J Emerg Med. 2011; 40:463–468.
Taghdiri F., Togha M., Razeghi J.S., Paknejad S.M. Celecoxib vs prednisone for the treatment of withdrawal headache in patients with medication overuse headache: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Headache. 2015; 55(1): 128-35.
Rossi P., Di Lorenzo C., Faroni J. et al. Advice alone vs. structured detoxification programmes for medication overuse headache: a prospective, randomized trial in transformed migraine patients with low medical needs. Cephalalgia. 2006;26(9):1097-105.
Rabe K., Pageler L., Gaul C. et al. Prednisone for the treatment of withdrawal headache in patients with medication overuse headache: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2013;33:202-207.
Huang Y., Cai X., Song X. et al. Steroids for preventing recurrence of acute severe migraine headaches: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Neurol. 2013; 20(8): 1184-1190.
Artemenko AR, Abramov VG, Bozhenkina TV, Konovalova ZN, Korenko AN, Krasavina DA, Kurenkov AL, Latysheva NV, Naprienko MV, Orlova OR, Filatova EG, Shevchenko VS, Yakovleva PN. Botulinum toxin type A (Relatox) in overcoming medication overuse in patients with chronic migraine: subgroup analysis of the results of a multicenter, single-blind, randomized, comparative phase IIIb study. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2023;123(11):64–74.
Giri S, Tronvik E, Linde M, Pedersen SA, Hagen K. Randomized controlled studies evaluating Topiramate, Botulinum toxin type A, and mABs targeting CGRP in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. 2023;43(4):3331024231156922.
Luedtke K., Allers A., Schulte L.H et al. Efficacy of interventions used by physiotherapists for patients with headache and migraine. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. 2016; 36(5): 474-492.
Millstine D., Chen C.Y., Bauer B. Complementary and integrative medicine in the management of headache. BMJ. 2017; 357:j1805.
Giannitrapani K, Holliday J, Miake-Lye I, et al. Synthesizing the strength of the evidence of complementary and integrative health therapies for pain. Pain Med. 2019; pii: pnz068.
Lee H.J., Lee J.H., Cho E.Y. et al. Efficacy of psychological treatment for headache disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Headache Pain. 2019; 20(1): 17.
Anheyer D, Leach M, Klose P, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for treating chronic headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. 2019;39(4):544-555.
Probyn K, Bowers H, Mistry D, et al. Non-pharmacological self-management for people living with migraine or tension-type headache: a systematic review including analysis of intervention components. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e016670.
Harris P., Loveman E., Clegg A. et al. Systematic review of cognitive behavioural therapy for the management of headaches and migraines in adults. Br. J. Pain. 2015; 9(4): 213-224.
Mukhtar NB, Meeus M, Gursen C, Mohammed J, De Pauw R, Cagnie B. Effectiveness of hands-off therapy in the management of primary headache: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eval Health Prof. 2021:163278720983408.
Golovacheva V., Parfenov V., Tabeeva G. et al. Multidisciplinary integrated headache treatment program: results and identification of factors that influence treatment response. Eur J of Neurol. 2016;23(Suppl.1):536.
Nestoriuc Y., Martin A. Efficacy of biofeedback for migraine: a meta-analysis. Pain. 2007;128(1-2):111-127.
Nestoriuc Y., Martin A., Rief W., Andrasik F. Biofeedback treatment for headache disorders: a comprehensive efficacy review. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback. 2008;33:125-140.
Naprienko MV, Safonov MI, Smekalkina LV. Results of using classical corporal acupuncture as part of complex treatment for chronic migraine. Manual Therapy. 2017;4(68):96-99.
Yin Jiang, Peng Bai, Hao Chen. et al.The Effect of Acupuncture on the Quality of Life in Patients With Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2018; 9: 1190.
Feng-Jiao Shen, Jia Xu, Yi-Jun Zhan.et al. Acupuncture for migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Journal of Acupuncture – Moxibustion. 2019;29(1): 7-14.
Falsiroli M.L., Geri T., Gianola S. et al. Effectiveness of trigger point manual treatment on the frequency, intensity, and duration of attacks in primary headaches: asystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front. Neurol. 2018;9:254.
Lemmens J., De Pauw J., Van Soom T.et al. The effect of aerobic exercise on the number of migraine days, duration and pain intensity in migraine: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J. Headache Pain. 2019; 20(1): 16.
Krøll L.S., Hammarlund C.S., Linde M., et al. The effects of aerobic exercise for persons with migraine and co-existing tension-type headache and neck pain. A randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(12):1805-1816.
Allen S.M., Mookadam F., Cha S.S. Greater occipital nerve block for acute treatment of migraine headache: a large retrospective cohort study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;1(2):211-218.
Cuadrado M.L., Aledo-Serrano Á., Navarro P. et al. Short-term effects of greater occipital nerve blocks in chronic migraine: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2017;37:864–872.
Misra U.K, Kalita J., Bhoi S.K. High-rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J. Neurol. 2013;260(11):2793-801.
Lan L., Zhanq X., Li X. et al. The efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation on migraine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. J Headache Pain. 2017;18(1):86.
Conforto A.B., Amaro E. Jr., Gonçalves A.L.et al. Randomized, proof-of-principle clinical trial of active transcranial magnetic stimulation in chronic migraine. Randomized controlled trial. Cephalalgia. 2014; 34(6): 464-472.
Stilling J.M., Monchi O., Amoozegar F., Debert C.T. Transcranial magnetic and direct currents (TMS/tDCS) for the treatment of headache: a systematic review. Headache. 2019; 59(3): 339-357.
Schoenen J., Vandersmissen B., Jeangette S.et al. Migraine prevention with a supraorbital transcutaneous stimulator. A-randomized-controlled-trial. Neurology. 2013;80:697–704.
Chou D., Yugrakh M., Winegarne D.et al. Acute migraine therapy with external trigeminal neurostimulation ACME: A randomized controlled trial. Cephalalgia. 2019; 39(1): 3–14.
Miller S., Sinclair A.J., Davies B. et al. Neurostimulation in the treatment of primary headaches. Pract Neurol. 2016; 16(5): 362–375.
Isagulyan ED, Ekusheva EV, Artemenko AR, et al. Neuromodulation in the treatment of primary headache disorders: mechanisms of efficacy, review of methods, and indications for use. Russian Journal of Pain. 2018;3(57):5–15.
Osipova VV, Ekusheva EV, Isagulyan ED, et al. Invasive neuromodulation in the treatment of refractory forms of migraine and cluster headache: patient selection criteria and efficacy review. Russian Journal of Pain. 2019;17(1):9-16.
Cadalso R.T., Daugherty J., Holmes C. et al. Efficacy of Electrical Stimulation of the Occipital Nerve in Intractable Primary Headache Disorders: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018; 32(1): 40-52.
Yang Y., Song M., Fan Y., Ma K. Occipital Nerve Stimulation for Migraine: A Systematic Review. Pain Pract. 2016;16(4):509-517.
Deer T., Levy R., Diaz R.L. et al. Safety and efficacy of peripheral nerve stimulation of the occipital nerves for the management of chronic migraine: results from a randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, controlled study. Cephalalgia. 2012; 32(16): 1165-79.
Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafii A. et al. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983;17(1):45-56.
Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011; 63 Suppl 11: S 240–252.
Chiarotto A, Maxwell LJ, Ostelo RW, Boers M, Tugwell P, Terwee CB. Measurement Properties of Visual Analogue Scale, Numeric Rating Scale, and Pain Severity Subscale of the Brief Pain Inventory in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. J Pain. 2019;20(3):245-263.
Steiner TJ, Joseph R, Hedman C, Rose FC. Metoprolol in the prophylaxis of migraine: parallel-groups comparison with placebo and dose-ranging follow-up. Headache 1988;28(1):15-23.
Linde M, Mulleners WM, Chronicle EP, McCrory DC. Topiramate for the prophylaxis of episodic migraine in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;2013(6):CD010610.
Buse D. C. et al. Migraine progression: a systematic review. Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain. 2019;59(3):306-338.
Probyn K. et al. Prognostic factors for chronic headache: a systematic review. Neurology.2017;89(3):291-301.
Chiang C. C. et al. Treatment of medication-overuse headache: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2016; 36(4):371-386.
Diagnosis and treatment of migraine: recommendations of Russian experts / Filatova EG, Osipova VV, Tabeeva GR, et al. Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. 2020;12(4):4-14.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Yulia E. Azimova, D.Sc. in Medicine, neurologist at the University Headache Clinic. Leading Research Fellow at the Research Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education. Member of the all-Russian public organization "Russian Headache Research Society". Member of the European public organization "European Headache Federation".
Vera V. Alferova, D.Sc. in Medicine, Chief Researcher at the Research Laboratory of Cerebral Vascular Diseases, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Alexander V. Amelin, D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor at the Department of Neurology, Head of the General Neurology Division at the Research Institute of Neurology of the National Medical Research Center, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Head of the Headache Committee of the Russian Interregional Pain Society, member of the Russian Headache Research Society.
Ada R. Artemenko, D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor at the Department of Nervous Diseases of the Institute of Professional Education, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) and the Center for Interdisciplinary Dentistry and Neurology, Moscow. Member of the Russian Headache Research Society, member of the European Headache Federation, member of the International Headache Society, member of the European Academy of Neurology.
Leila R. Akhmadeeva, D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor at the Department of Neurology, Bashkir State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Member of the Russian Headache Research Society, Head of the Bashkir Branch, member of the Interregional Association of Botulinum Therapy Specialists.
Veronika A. Golovacheva, Ph.D. in Medicine, Associate Professor at the Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University). Member of the all-Russian public organization "Russian Headache Research Society".
Alexey B. Danilov, D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Head of the Department of Nervous Diseases, Institute of Professional Education, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University). Director of the Institute of Interdisciplinary Medicine. Executive Director of the Russian Headache Patients Association. Board Member of the European Migraine and Headache Alliance (EMHA).
Evgenia V. Ekusheva, D.Sc. in Medicine, Head of the Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurorehabilitation, Academy of Postgraduate Education under the Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency of Russia; Academician Aleksandr Veyn Headache and Autonomic Disorders Clinic; GUTA Clinic, Moscow. Member of the all-Russian public organization "Russian Pain Society". Member of the Headache and Facial Pain Committees of the Russian Interregional Pain Study Society. Member of the interregional public organization of botulinum therapy specialists. Member of the European public organization "European Headache Federation" and the international public organization "International Headache Society".
Emil D. Isagulyan, Cand. Sc. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Neurosurgeon-Algologist at the Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Russian Ministry of Health. FIPP 1298/01 (International fellow of interventional pain practice / in Russia). President of the National Neuromodulation Society in Russia (NNSR). Vice-President of the Association for Interventional Pain Treatment (AIPT).
Kovalchuk Nadezhda Alexandrovna, PhD in Medicine, Assistant Professor at the Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery, Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University). Member of the Russian Society for the Study of Headache (RSSH).
Marina I. Koreshkina, D.Sc. in Medicine, Head of the Headache Treatment Center at Adel Med Medical College Clinic LLC, Saint Petersburg, editor of the "All About Headaches" portal. Member of the Russian Headache Research Society. Member of the International Headache Society.
Olga V. Kurushina, D. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Medical Genetics, Volgograd State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health. Board Member of the All-Russian Society of Neurologists. Member of the Russian Headache Research Society.
Nina V. Latysheva, D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor at the Department of Nervous Diseases of the Institute of Professional Education, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University) and Academician Alexander Wayne Headache and Autonomic Disorders Clinic, Moscow. Member of the Russian Headache Research Society. Member of the European Headache Federation. Member of the International Headache Society.
Elena R. Lebedeva, D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor at the Department of Hospital Therapy, Ural State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Head of the "Europe-Asia" International Headache Center, Yekaterinburg. Member of the Russian Headache Research Society. Member of the International Headache Society. Member of the European Headache Federation. Member of the Headache Section of the European Academy of Neurology. Russian representative in the Education Committee of the European Academy of Neurology.
Margarita V. Naprienko, D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor at the Department of Sports Medicine and Medical Rehabilitation of the N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University). Chief Medical Officer of the Academician Alexander Wayne Headache and Autonomic Disorders Clinic. Member of the Russian Headache Research Society. Member of the Interregional Association of Botulinum Therapy Specialists. Member of the European Headache Federation.
Vera V. Osipova, D.Sc. in Medicine, neurologist at the University Headache Clinic. Leading Researcher at the Solovyov Research and Practical Center for Mental Health of the Moscow Healthcare Department. Member of the Russian Headache Research Society (RHRS). Member of the European Headache Federation (EHF). Member of the Lifting the Burden (LTB) campaign. Member of the Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (ICHD IHS).
Nikolay A. Pavlov, Cand. Sc. (Med.), Leading Researcher at the Research Laboratory of Cerebral Vascular Diseases, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Vladimir A. Parfenov, D. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health (Sechenov University). Board member of the All-Russian Society of Neurologists, board member of the National Stroke Association, member of the "General Neurology" panel of the European Academy of Neurology.
Andrey P. Rachin, MD, PhD, Professor, President of the National Association of Experts in Comorbid Neurology. Board Member of the All-Russian Society of Neurologists. Presidium Member and Auditor of the Russian Headache Research Society (RHRS).
Alexey V. Sergeev, PhD, Associate Professor at the Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University). Member of the All-Russian Public Organization «Russian Headache Research Society» (RHRS). Member of the All-Russian Public Organization «Russian Pain Society» (RPS) and Head of the Pediatric Pain Study Committee of the RPS. Member of the European public organization «European Headache Federation». Russia Representative in the international public organization «International Headache Society».
Kirill V. Skorobogatykh, PhD, Neurologist, Head of the University Headache Clinic (Moscow). Member of the All-Russian Public Organization «Russian Headache Research Society». RF Representative in the European public organization «European Headache Federation». Member of the Education Committee of the international public organization «International Headache Society».
Gyuzal R. Tabeeva, MD, Professor at the Department of Nervous Diseases and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University). President of the All-Russian Public Organization «Russian Headache Research Society». Member of the European public organization «European Headache Federation».
Elena G. Filatova, MD, Professor at the Department of Nervous Diseases, Institute of Professional Education, FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University) and Academician Aleksandr Wayne Headache and Autonomic Disorders Clinic, Moscow. Member of the All-Russian Public Organization «Russian Headache Research Society». Member of the European public organization «European Headache Federation».
Conflict of interest: none.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
neurologists, general practitioners, family physicians;
medical students, residents, postgraduate students;
faculty members, researchers;
In these clinical guidelines, all information is graded by the level of reliability (evidence) depending on the quantity and quality of studies on the given issue (Table 1, Table 2, Table 3).
Table A1. Levels of Evidence (LoE) scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions).
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table S2. Scale for assessing levels of evidence reliability (LER) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except for RCTs using meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table А3. Scale for assessing levels of recommendation certainty (LRC) for methods of prevention, diagnostics, treatment, and medical rehabilitation, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions).
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines
The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
The procedure for updating clinical guidelines for migraine provides for their systematic updating at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of migraine, and in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
These clinical guidelines were developed taking into account the following regulatory legal documents:
Federal Law No. 323-FZ dated November 21, 2011, "On the Fundamentals of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation"
Procedure for the provision of medical care to the adult population for nervous system diseases (Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 926n dated November 15, 2012).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 103n dated February 28, 2019, "On Approval of the Procedure and Timeframes for the Development of Clinical Guidelines, Their Revision, the Standard Form of Clinical Guidelines, and Requirements for Their Structure, Composition, and Scientific Validity of the Information Included in Clinical Guidelines."
State Register of Medicines https://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/GRLS.aspx
Appendix A3.1. HEADACHE DIARY
DIARY COMPLETION INSTRUCTIONS
Before your consultation at the Headache Center, it is very important that you fill out this diary daily. The information you record in the diary will help the physician accurately determine the diagnosis and severity of your headache (HA), as well as promptly prescribe the optimal treatment for you.
At the top, write your full name, date of birth, and the date you started filling out the diary. Then, opposite Question 1 in the 1st column, write the date (day of the month) when the diary is filled out. You can enter dates in all columns right away, as you will need to fill out the diary daily.
Please fill out the diary every evening before going to bed, checking [√] the boxes (1) in the vertical column. This data represents summarized information about any headache(s) if they occurred on that day. If you did not have a headache on that day, answer only Questions 2 and 15. If you have finished filling out one page of the diary, please continue on the next page (several copies are attached).
Instructions for answering the questions are provided below.
Indicate only the day (e.g., 12); month and year do not need to be specified.
Check «Yes» or «No» in the boxes opposite all questions, or proceed directly to Question 15 (if there was no headache on that day).
Indicate the time (hour in 24-hour format) when you first noticed the onset of the headache. If you woke up already with a headache, indicate the waking time. (If the morning headache is a continuation of the evening one, put an X in the column).
Indicate the time (hour and minutes in 24-hour format) when the headache completely stopped. If the headache was still present on that day before going to bed, leave the box blank. If the headache was absent in the morning, indicate the bedtime. If the headache persisted in the morning, put an X in that day's column, as well as an X in the Question 3 column on the next page. Continue your entries on the next day as usual.
Some people experience certain visual disturbances within 1 hour before the onset of a headache. These may include flashes of light, luminous zigzag lines, «blind» spots, or «black holes» that persist even when eyes are closed. Check «Yes» if you experienced something similar, or «No» if such phenomena did not occur. If you were simply bothered by light (see Question 12) and nothing else, check «No».
Check the box corresponding to the localization of the headache (predominantly on one side of the head or on both sides).
While there are many descriptions of headache character, most headaches are either "pulsating" (the pain intensifies synchronously with the heartbeat) or "pressing/tightening" (like a "band" or "helmet"). Check the characteristic that best reflects your type of headache.
Some types of headaches worsen even with minor physical exertion (e.g., climbing stairs) or force a person to avoid such activity. Check «Yes» if this applies to your headache, and «No» if this is not characteristic of you.
Headache intensity (severity) is an important component of the diagnosis. Rate the severity of your headache by checking the appropriate box: "mild" headache is a headache that does not disrupt normal activities (i.e., your working capacity and regular activity), "moderate" - makes normal activities difficult but does not completely prevent them, and finally, "severe" pain is a headache that completely disrupts your normal activity. Try to assess the headache intensity throughout the day as a whole. For example, if the pain was mild in the first half of the day and then became severe, check the "moderate" box. If the pain was very intense for almost the entire day, check "severe".
Check «No» if you had no nausea at all during the day. If you experienced mild nausea that hardly bothered you, did not cause belching or retching, check «mild», or in case of more pronounced nausea, «marked».
Check «Yes» or «No». Belching and retching are not considered vomiting.
The question concerns normal daylight or indoor light, not very bright light. Check «Yes» if normal light bothered you or you tried to avoid it by darkening the room or wearing sunglasses. Otherwise, check «No».
The question concerns normal noise, not very loud sounds. Check «Yes» if the noise bothered you or you tried to avoid it by secluding yourself in a quiet room. Otherwise, check «No».
Please list any causes (factors) that you think might have triggered the headache. Perhaps you ate, drank, or did something (e.g., skipped lunch, stayed up all night, did physical work), or there were other causes (weather change, stress, menstruation).
Please list the names of any medications (tablets, suppositories, injections, nasal sprays) you took for headache or any other pain. For each medication, indicate the number of doses taken, as well as the time of administration (hours in 24-hour format) for each medication. Do not list medications taken for other indications.
Headache diary
Full Name: ________________________________________________
Date of Birth (d/m/y) ___________________________________
Diary start date: _____________________________
Diary end date: ___________________________
Read the instructions carefully before filling out the diary! Fill out one column every evening, checking the appropriate boxes.
Date (day of the week and day of the month) | Mon ___ | Tue ___ | Wed ___ | Thu ___ | Fri ___ | Sat ___ | Sun ___ | Mon ___ | Tue ___ | Wed ___ | Thu ___ | Fri ___ | Sat ___ | Sun ___ | Mon ___ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Did you have a headache today? (If no, proceed directly to question No. 15) | Absent Yes | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | |
If yes, when did you first notice it? (hh:mm) | ||||||||||||||||
When did your headache stop? (hh:mm) | ||||||||||||||||
Within an hour before the headache started, did you notice any visual disturbances (flashes of light, zigzag lines, blind spots, other)? | Absent Yes: | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | |
Where was the headache located? | Unilateral Bilateral | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | |
Headache character | Pulsating: Pressing: | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | |
Did the headache worsen with physical activity (climbing stairs, other)? | Absent Yes: | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | |
What was the overall intensity of the headache? (see instructions) | Mild Moderate Severe | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | |
Did you have nausea? | Absent Mild: Pronounced: | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | 1 1 1 | |
Did you have vomiting? | Absent Yes | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | |
Were you bothered by light? | Absent Yes | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | |
Were you bothered by sound? | Absent Yes | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | 1 1 | |
Could anything have caused your headache? | If Yes, please specify | |||||||||||||||
Did you take any medications today for a headache or any other pain? For each medication, indicate: A) name B) dose taken C) time taken |
Please make sure you have filled out all columns!
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Note: HA – headache; M – migraine; ICHD-3 – International Classification of Headache Disorders; CD – comorbid disorders
Appendix C. Patient Information
What is migraine?
“During a migraine attack, I feel completely shattered and totally torn out of my daily life for a day or even more. The pain starts gradually in the temple area, then builds up, becoming stronger and stronger; nausea appears, sometimes I might vomit; even ordinary sounds and light are irritating. I feel so awful that I am forced to lie down in bed. After taking an analgesic medication, the pain may subside in a couple of hours, but not always. The next day I feel heaviness in my head and malaise, but still significantly better than the day before.”
Description of migraine
Migraine is a benign neurological disorder manifested by headache attacks that can occur with varying frequency: from 1–2 times a year to several times a month. The main manifestations of a migraine attack are severe pulsating headache in the frontotemporal region, usually on one side of the head, nausea, less commonly vomiting, intolerance to light, sounds, odors, and exacerbation of pain by routine physical activity. During a migraine attack, work capacity and habitual activity are significantly impaired.
Why does migraine occur?
A migraine attack is a consequence of the excitation of certain brain structures, as well as the release of pain mediators into the bloodstream and dilation of the blood vessels of the dura mater, which covers the brain. Migraine is a hereditary disease: people suffering from this disorder inherit “migraine” genes from one of their parents and can “pass” them on to their children.
Who gets migraines?
Migraine is the most common form of cephalalgia after tension-type headache; it occurs in 14% of people. Every seventh adult suffers from migraines; women experience migraines three times more often than men. The disease usually begins in childhood or adolescence. In girls, migraines frequently start during puberty.
What are the types of migraine?
The most frequent type of migraine is migraine without aura, occurring in 75% of patients. Less common is migraine with aura, where the pain attack is preceded by transient and fully reversible neurological deficits. Most frequently, visual disturbances are noted (luminous zigzags, flickering, visual field defects), less commonly sensory disturbances (numbness of one hand, half of the face, and tongue spreading from bottom to top) and speech disorders. A combination of both forms of migraine in the same patient is possible, as well as the occurrence of a migraine aura without headache.
The most severe form is chronic migraine, in which headaches may occur 15 or more days per month or even daily. The main factors leading to an increased frequency of migraine attacks are emotional stress, depression, overuse of analgesic medications, and caffeine (strong tea, coffee, energy drinks).
How does migraine manifest?
A migraine attack has four stages, although not all may be fully present in every patient. The premonitory phase of migraine (prodrome) occurs earlier than other symptoms of the attack and can manifest a few hours or even a day before the development of the headache with the following symptoms: neck pain, irritability, depressed mood, fatigue or, conversely, increased activity, appetite, sensitivity to light and odors.
Aura, if present, is the next phase. Only a third of patients with migraine have ever experienced an aura, and it may not develop in every attack. Aura is not dangerous to health; it lasts 10–30 minutes, rarely longer, and resolves completely. Visual aura is most common. You may “see” blind spots, flashes of light, or a multicolored zigzag line spreading from the center of the visual field to the periphery. Sensory symptoms occur less frequently—a tingling sensation or numbness starting in the fingertips on one side, spreading up to the shoulder, and sometimes moving to the cheek or tongue on the same side. Sensory symptoms are almost always accompanied by visual disturbances. In addition, during an aura, there may be speech difficulties or trouble finding words.
The headache phase is the most severe for most people, lasting from several hours to 2–3 days. Migraine headache can be very severe, most often occurring in the frontal or temporal region of one side of the head, but it can start in the occipital region, involve other areas, and the entire head. Usually, it is a pulsating or throbbing pain that worsens with movement and physical exertion. Nausea and even vomiting often occur, which relieves the headache. During an attack, light and sounds of even ordinary intensity are very frequently unpleasant, so patients prefer to remain alone in a quiet, darkened room.
The headache phase is followed by the resolution phase. During this period, you may again feel tired, irritable, or depressed, and find it difficult to concentrate. These symptoms can persist for up to a day before you feel completely healthy.
What are migraine triggers?
Every patient with migraine would like to know what can trigger an attack. As a rule, this is difficult or impossible because each patient has their “own” triggers; even for the same patient, different attacks can be triggered by different factors. The most common precipitants of a migraine attack include:
Psychological factors: emotional stress, as well as relaxation after stress.
Environmental factors: bright or flickering light, sharp odors, weather changes, staying in stuffy or hot environments.
Dietary factors: certain foods (citrus fruits, nuts, chocolate, bananas, smoked foods, full-fat cheeses) and alcohol (red wine, beer, champagne), skipping meals (hunger), inadequate nutrition, caffeine withdrawal, and insufficient water intake.
Sleep: changes in sleep patterns, both sleep deprivation and excessive sleep (e.g., on weekends).
Hormonal factors in women: menstruation, hormonal contraceptives, and hormone replacement therapy.
Other life factors: intense physical exertion, long trips, especially with time zone changes, air travel.
Identifying your individual triggers and learning to avoid them (if possible) is an important task for every patient and can significantly reduce the number of attacks.
What might you feel between migraine attacks?
Between migraine attacks, most people feel well. However, some individuals outside of pain attacks may complain of increased anxiety and even panic attacks, lowered mood up to severe depression, poor sleep, other types of pain (e.g., tight, “helmet-like” tension-type headaches [TTH], back pain, etc.), soreness and tension in the neck and occipital muscles, and gastrointestinal disturbances. These disorders, frequently comorbid with migraine, can impair general well-being and require treatment. Be sure to tell your doctor about these complaints so that they can prescribe the necessary treatment.
How is migraine treated?
Medications used to relieve an attack are called abortive migraine therapies. Properly selected drugs can be very effective if taken correctly and in small quantities. Such remedies include over-the-counter analgesic medications, most of which contain acetylsalicylic acid, ibuprofen**, or paracetamol**. Soluble formulations of these drugs, such as effervescent tablets, act faster and better.
If you are greatly bothered by nausea or vomiting, antiemetic medications can be used. Some of them actually enhance the effect of analgesic medications by increasing their absorption in the gastrointestinal tract. If you experience severe nausea or vomiting, you can use these drugs in the form of rectal suppositories.
Your doctor may prescribe one of the specific antimigraine medications. These drugs must be resorted to if analgesics, antipyretics, and antiemetics prove insufficiently effective. Antimigraine agents differ from standard analgesic medications. They do not act on the pain itself, but on the pathological processes occurring in the brain during a migraine attack. These agents include selective 5-HT1 receptor agonists (triptans)—the most effective in aborting a migraine attack—and preparations containing ergotamine. If necessary, you can combine these agents with NSAIDs and antiemetics.
There are several approaches to increase the effectiveness of drug therapy for a migraine attack.
1 Take the medication at the very onset of the attack…
Always keep at least one dose of the medication recommended by your doctor with you. Take the medication at the very beginning of the headache. There are no medications capable of stopping a migraine aura. During a migraine attack, the gastrointestinal tract slows down, so oral medications are absorbed into the bloodstream slower than usual. If your condition permits, drink something sweet (strong sweet tea).
2 … but not too frequently
Always strictly follow the instructions for use of the medication. In particular, do not use headache relief medications too often, as this can lead to medication-overuse headache (MOH) associated with excessive use of analgesics. To prevent MOH, under no circumstances should you use medications to stop migraines and other types of pain more frequently than 8 days per month. Excessive intake of any classes of medications with analgesic properties contributes to an increased frequency of headaches (not only migraines, but also tension-type headaches).
What to do if this treatment does not help?
If your migraine attacks are very frequent or severe and respond poorly to analgesics, a course of preventive treatment prescribed by a doctor is indicated for you. Unlike acute attack abortive medications, preventive therapy requires daily intake, as this treatment aims to prevent the development of migraine attacks.
Most preventive medications were originally developed for the treatment of other conditions, so you should not be surprised if you are prescribed a medication from the antidepressant or anticonvulsant groups, or one used to lower blood pressure. You have not been prescribed treatment for these indications; these medications simply also possess anti-migraine properties.
When prescribed one or more medications, carefully follow their instructions for use. Studies have shown that the most common cause of insufficient efficacy in preventive treatment is non-adherence to the therapy regimen. Preventive migraine treatment should last from 3 to 12 months depending on the severity of the disease (on average 6 months).
For the treatment of very frequent (chronic) migraines (when the number of headache days exceeds 15 per month), you may be recommended botulinum toxin type A injections into the head and neck muscles. In clinical trials, this method has demonstrated high efficacy and is widely used globally for the treatment of severe migraines.
What else can you do to help yourself?
Regular exercise, water procedures, psychological relaxation techniques, walks, and hobbies will improve your well-being. If there is pain and tension in the neck and occipital muscles, collar-zone massage and cervical spine gymnastics are useful. It is important to avoid attack triggers, primarily emotional stress, excessive workloads, sleep deprivation, and long gaps between meals.
Keeping a headache diary
Keeping a diary will help gather important information about your headache: how often your head hurts, how long the headache lasts, what triggers it, what symptoms accompany it, how many analgesics you take, and how frequently. This information is extremely valuable for making a correct diagnosis, identifying medication overuse and headache-triggering factors, and evaluating treatment efficacy.
What to do if you suspect you are pregnant?
You need to consult a doctor, as some anti-migraine medications are contraindicated during pregnancy.
Do you need additional diagnostic workup?
In most cases, after a thorough interview, diagnosing a migraine is straightforward for the doctor. Diagnosis is based on your description of the headache characteristics, concomitant symptoms, and triggering and relieving factors; the absence of any abnormalities on neurological examination is mandatory. Try to describe your headache to the doctor in as much detail as possible. It is very important to report how often and in what quantities you take analgesics or other medications.
There are no diagnostic tests that confirm a migraine diagnosis. Brain imaging (CT, MRI), electroencephalography, rheoencephalography (REG), ultrasound of head vessels, and an ophthalmologist consultation are generally uninformative, as no migraine-specific abnormalities are detected during these tests. Minor abnormalities detected can often also be found in individuals without headache complaints.
If your doctor is unsure of the diagnosis, they may order additional tests to rule out other causes of headaches. As a rule, this is unnecessary. If the doctor did not order additional tests, it means they are confident in the diagnosis of "Migraine" and performing tests will in no way facilitate the prescription of treatment.
Can migraine be cured?
There is no complete cure for migraine. Nevertheless, modern therapeutic approaches can significantly reduce the frequency, duration, and severity of migraine attacks and alleviate associated disorders in the interictal period. In most people, migraine attacks become less frequent with age and typically stop after 50 years. To prevent an increase in migraine frequency, it is necessary to avoid factors of chronification, primarily stress, low mood (depression), excessive intake of analgesics, and caffeine.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. Visual Analogue Scale for pain
Russian name: Visual Analogue Scale for Pain (VAS)
Original title: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) [164 - 166]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: intended for measuring pain intensity (in the case of TTH – tension-type headache)
Content: The VAS is a continuous scale in the form of a horizontal or vertical line 10 cm long with tick marks every 1 cm from 0 to 10, where 0 points = "no pain" and 10 points = "worst imaginable pain."
Key (interpretation): A higher score indicates greater pain intensity.
Explanation: For example, a score of 2 to 4 points indicates mild pain intensity, 5 to 7 moderate pain, 8 to 9 very severe pain, and 10 unbearable, extreme pain.
