List of Abbreviations
AA — aplastic anemia
allo-HSCT – allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
ATG** – antithymocyte globulin**
G-CSF – granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (L03AA according to the ATC classification)
GPI – glycosylphosphatidylinositol
IST – immunosuppressive therapy
IFN – interferon
BM – bone marrow
MDS — myelodysplastic syndrome
PNH — paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
HSC – hematopoietic stem cell
CsA** – cyclosporine **
Terms and Definitions
Acquired aplastic anemia (AA) is a hematological disorder characterized by pancytopenia and a sharp decrease in bone marrow cellularity with a quantitative deficiency of hematopoietic stem cells and committed progenitors caused by cellular autoimmune mechanisms.
Combined immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in patients with AA. The optimal non-transplant therapeutic approach for AA, including a course of antithymocyte globulin** (ATG**) and long-term therapy with cyclosporine** (CsA**).
Programmed treatment of patients with AA is a set of therapeutic measures performed in stages starting from the moment of disease diagnosis, implemented according to a specific algorithm, including hematopoietic cell transplantation from an HLA-genoidentical donor or IST with ATG** and CsA**, and if necessary, repeated courses of ATG** and other treatment modalities (hematopoietic cell transplantation from alternative donors and/or the use of the thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag), enabling long-term patient survival.
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clone (PNH clone) is a hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) clone with a mutation in the PIG-A gene, leading to impaired synthesis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI).
Complete remission is practical normalization of hemogram parameters: hemoglobin >100.0 g/L, granulocytes >1.5×109/L, platelets >100.0×109/L, and no need for blood component replacement therapy.
Partial remission: hemoglobin 90–100.0 g/L, granulocytes >0.5–1.5×109/L, platelets 30–100×109/L, and no need for blood component replacement therapy.
Clinical and hematological improvement (minimal hematological response) is improvement in hemogram parameters (hemoglobin 70.0–85 g/L, granulocytes 0.5–1.0×109/L, platelets >20.0×109/L), and disappearance or significant reduction of dependence on blood component transfusions.
Refractory AA is diagnosed in the absence of a response to ongoing combined IST following a second course of ATG** at 6–9 months from the start of the first course.
Neutropenia is a granulocyte count of less than 0.5×109/L, or less than 1.0×109/L with an expected decrease over the next several days [142].
Febrile status is a single elevation of body temperature ≥38.3°C or a body temperature ≥37.8°C persisting for one hour or more.
Hypothermia is a drop in body temperature below 36 °C. This indicator is an important sign of an infectious process, especially in young children and patients receiving glucocorticosteroids [181].
Fever of unknown origin – a condition characterized by fever in the absence of clinical and radiological manifestations of infection and microbiological data.
Bacteremia is the identification of a microorganism from a blood culture taken during a febrile episode that is not a contaminant. False bacteremia includes the identification of so-called contaminants—skin commensals of the hands: coagulase-negative staphylococci, Propionibacterium spp., Micrococcus spp., etc.—in the case of their single identification [115,142,144].
Proven infection is defined by the identification of a microorganism from sterile body sites (blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, biopsy material) in the presence of symptoms of an inflammatory response, or the isolation of a pathogen from non-sterile sites (skin, mucous membranes, gastrointestinal tract) with a corresponding local clinical presentation of infection.
Probable infection is defined as infection without the identification of a microorganism from the studied media in the presence of clinical and/or radiological signs of infection with a rapid response to anti-infective therapy.
Febrile neutropenia is a symptom complex combining the development of fever or hypothermia in a patient meeting criteria for neutropenia. It is the most expected infectious complication and develops in the vast majority of patients with AA. In neutropenic patients, due to impaired barrier function of the skin and gastrointestinal mucosa, translocation of endogenous intestinal flora directly into the bloodstream may occur. During an infectious episode, local clinical symptoms may be absent, and the only sign may be febrile fever/hypothermia, lethargy, or altered consciousness [179,180].
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Aplastic anemia is a hematological disorder characterized by pancytopenia and a sharp decrease in bone marrow cellularity with a quantitative deficiency of hematopoietic stem cells and committed progenitors caused by cellular autoimmune mechanisms.
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
One of the leading mechanisms of hematopoiesis impairment in AA is considered to be immune aggression directed against hematopoietic progenitor cells [1].
Bone marrow failure in AA develops as a result of the suppression of hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation by activated T-lymphocytes. Activation of T-lymphocytes, expansion of cytotoxic T-clones, and release of mediators of immune suppression of hematopoiesis (interferon gamma [IFNγ], tumor necrosis factor alpha) or factors stimulating T-lymphocyte proliferation and activation (interleukin-2) lead to impaired proliferation and stimulated apoptosis of progenitor cells, resulting in a significant reduction in the hematopoietic cell pool and the development of bone marrow aplasia [1–3].
The main clinical manifestations of the disease are anemia, hemorrhagic syndrome, and severe infectious complications [2].
In addition, the course of AA may be complicated by the development of clonal disorders such as paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The frequency of clonal complications can reach 32% over 10 years [3,4]. The emergence of clonal hematopoiesis can also be detected at earlier stages of AA. This primarily refers to AA occurring with a PNH clone [5,6]. At the same time, the detection of a clone with a deficiency of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) proteins does not mean the development of PNH as an independent disease with a picture of classical intravascular hemolysis. The size of the PNH clone during the course of AA can vary up to complete disappearance [7]. Evolution into classical PNH, according to various authors, accounts for 11–17% [8–10].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
According to epidemiological studies, aplastic anemia occurs with varying frequencies in regions such as Europe, North America, and the Far and Middle East; meanwhile, according to the International Agranulocytosis and Aplastic Anemia Study, the prevalence of AA in European countries is 2 cases per 1 million population per year, with this indicator fluctuating depending on the specific country from 0.6 to 3 or more cases per 1 million population per year [11].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
D61.3 – Idiopathic aplastic anemia
D61.8 – Other specified aplastic anemias
D61.9 – Aplastic anemia, unspecified
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
Acquired AA:
Idiopathic AA
Secondary AA
“Seronegative” hepatitis
Immunopathology
Pregnancy
Radiation
Drugs and chemical toxins
Viruses
The following criteria for the severity of acquired AA are distinguished:
Very severe aplastic anemia:
Bone marrow cellularity according to trephine biopsy <25% (or cellularity >25% but <50% with a myeloid element content [i.e., excluding lymphocytes and plasma cells] <30%) and 2 or more of the following indicators:
Neutrophils <0.2×109/L
Platelets <20×109/L
Corrected reticulocytosis <1% (less than 40,000/µL)
Severe aplastic anemia
Bone marrow cellularity according to trephine biopsy <25% (or cellularity 25%–50% with a bone marrow myeloid element content [i.e., excluding lymphocytes and plasma cells] <30%) and 2 or more of the following indicators:
Neutrophils >0.2×109/L, but <0.5×109/L
Platelets <20×109/L /µL
Corrected reticulocytosis <1% (or less than 40,000/µL on automated counting)
Non-severe acquired aplastic anemia
All other cases that do not meet the criteria for severe and very severe AA are classified as non-severe (moderately severe) AA.
When determining the severity of AA, data from at least three blood counts taken over a period of at least 2 weeks are taken into account.
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
The manifestation of clinical symptoms of AA can be either sudden, with the development of prominent hemorrhagic syndrome and infectious lesions associated with profound neutropenia (stomatitis, sinusitis, pneumonia, enterocolitis), or gradual, presenting with complaints of weakness, fatigue, decreased exercise tolerance forming a typical anemia syndrome, and the development of hemorrhage.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Many recommended methods for diagnosing the disease and associated conditions have a limited evidence base according to the levels of evidence (LE) and grades of recommendation (GR) scales due to the lack of clinical studies devoted to them. Despite this, they are necessary elements of patient evaluation for diagnosis and treatment selection, as more effective and proven methods have not yet been developed.
Criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition: AA is diagnosed based on the presence of pancytopenia, absence of hepatosplenomegaly, constitutional symptoms, and symptoms characteristic of acute leukemias, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, or infections presenting with pancytopenia. A mandatory condition for documenting an AA diagnosis is the demonstration of severe bone marrow hypocellularity (less than 25% of the age-adjusted normal value) according to trephine biopsy data, absence of leukemic cells in the bone marrow aspirate, and negative tests for constitutional bone marrow failure syndromes (primarily Fanconi anemia and congenital dyskeratosis).
The diagnosis of AA is established based on clinical manifestations and laboratory examination data.
Trilineage cytopenia: anemia (hemoglobin <110 g/L), granulocytopenia (granulocytes <2.0×109/L), thrombocytopenia (platelets <100.0×109/L).
Absence of leukemic cells and solid tumor cells, and absence of megakaryocytes according to bone marrow aspiration data.
Bone marrow aplasia in the iliac bone biopsy specimen (dominance of fatty bone marrow >75%).
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
In all patients with suspected or confirmed AA, it is recommended to take a medical history and evaluate complaints regarding blood and hematopoietic disorders [12].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: history-taking should identify potential exposure to toxic or medicinal agents or association with hepatitis B and C. A thorough family history is necessary to rule out congenital anomalies, as well as ascertaining the presence of siblings (brothers and/or sisters) to consider the possibility of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT).
2.2 Physical Examination
Physical examination helps suspect genetic syndromes characterized by aplastic anemia (Fanconi anemia, congenital dyskeratosis), detect changes characteristic of acute leukemias and solid tumors, and assess the severity of hemorrhagic syndrome and infectious lesions, i.e., evaluate the immediate threat to the patient's life.
Particular attention should be paid to:
- Facial structural anomalies (triangular face, small eyes, epicanthus, fine facial features, microcephaly) and limb anomalies (thumb anomalies, thenar shape, polydactyly, syndactyly, clinodactyly)
- Presence of skin pigmentation features (café-au-lait spots, reticular hyperpigmentation, hyperpigmentation)
- Nail dystrophy, especially on the toes
- Hair color and structure (premature graying, thinning, brittleness, fineness)
- Signs of hemorrhagic syndrome (skin, oral mucosa, eye conjunctiva)
- Presence of oral mucosal leukoplakia
- Epiphora
- Liver and spleen size
- Degree of enlargement, number, localization, and characteristics of lymph nodes
- Presence of hypospadias
In all patients with suspected or confirmed AA, it is recommended to perform a general physical examination at each consultation [12–14].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the examination should include inspection of the oral cavity (including the oral mucosa and tonsils), measurement of height, body weight, and body temperature, assessment of the skin status and osteoarticular system, detection of signs of hemorrhagic syndrome, cardiac and pulmonary auscultation, palpation of peripheral lymph nodes, thyroid gland, and abdominal organs to assess non-hematological anomalies that may indicate the presence of constitutional AA.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
In all patients with suspected AA, as well as in all patients with confirmed AA at least 2 times a week until a hematological response is achieved, and subsequently 1 time per month, it is recommended to perform a complete blood count with determination of the absolute reticulocyte count and platelet count to verify the diagnosis and assess disease dynamics [12,15].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: determining the severity of AA requires 3 consecutive blood tests. During treatment monitoring, a complete blood count is performed at least 2–3 times a week until graft engraftment or response to immunosuppressive therapy is achieved, and subsequently 1 time per month [16].
In all patients with suspected AA, as well as in all patients with confirmed AA 1 time per week until a hematological response is achieved, and subsequently 1 time per month, it is recommended to perform a general clinical biochemical blood test (urea, creatinine, bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium) to assess the general condition of the patient, organ and system functions, and to monitor complications of immunosuppressive therapy [17].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
In all patients with suspected AA, as well as those receiving red blood cell transfusion support, it is recommended to analyze ferrokinetics parameters (study of serum iron level, blood ferritin level) to assess the degree of iron overload [1,18].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
In all patients during AA diagnosis, it is recommended to perform a coagulogram (screening coagulation test) (activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time, fibrinogen) to assess the presence of coagulation disorders in order to determine supportive care tactics [16,17,19].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
In all patients with suspected AA or newly diagnosed AA, if not performed previously, it is recommended to determine ABO blood groups; D antigen of the Rh system (Rh factor); C, c, E, e, Cw, K, k antigen phenotype and red blood cell antibodies to select transfusion media and minimize transfusion reactions [16,17,19].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: considering the high frequency of transfusions and developing alloimmunization to donor blood components, red blood cell transfusions must be performed taking into account the erythrocyte phenotype
In all patients with suspected AA, it is recommended to perform hospital screening: determination of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HbsAg) in the blood, hepatitis C virus antibodies, Treponema pallidum antibodies in the blood, human immunodeficiency virus HIV 1/2 IgM and IgG antibodies in the blood. If necessary, molecular biological blood testing for human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1) to determine the need for antiretroviral therapy [16,17,19].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
In all patients with suspected AA, it is recommended to determine hepatitis B virus DNA, hepatitis C virus RNA, Epstein-Barr virus DNA, cytomegalovirus DNA, human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6) DNA, and parvovirus B19 DNA by PCR in peripheral blood [16,17,19].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
In all patients with suspected AA, it is recommended to study the concentration of folic acid and vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) in the blood for differential diagnosis with deficiency anemias [15,17,19].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
In all patients with suspected AA, it is recommended to study blood immunoglobulin levels and peripheral blood immunophenotyping to identify lymphocyte subpopulations (main ones) for differential diagnosis with primary immunodeficiencies [17,19].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
In all patients during AA diagnosis, it is recommended to perform a diepoxybutane test (DEB test) to rule out Fanconi anemia [12,15,20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
In all patients during AA diagnosis, and every 6–12 months from the start of immunosuppressive therapy, it is recommended to determine clones with glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored protein deficiency (PNH clones) to detect the combination of AA and PNH, analyze PNH clone size over time, and evaluate clonal evolution to PNH [5-10].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
In all patients during AA diagnosis, as well as their siblings, it is recommended to perform low-resolution HLA DNA typing for 6 alleles of the A, B, and DRB1 loci with a consultation at a transplantation center to choose the treatment method and search for a potential bone marrow donor [21].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
In all patients during AA diagnosis, it is recommended to perform a bone marrow trephine biopsy from the posterior iliac crest with histological examination. Subsequent routine trephine biopsies for monitoring are not indicated; indications are determined individually, primarily when myelodysplastic syndrome with bone marrow fibrosis is suspected [12,15,22,23].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
In all patients during AA diagnosis, as well as every 12–24 months after achieving a hematological response, it is recommended to obtain a bone marrow cytologic preparation by aspiration of the anterior or posterior iliac crests, perform a bone marrow smear cytologic examination (myelogram) to assess the cellular composition of bone marrow hematopoiesis, and perform cytogenetic testing to predict transformation into MDS/hematological malignancy [12,15,22,23].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: in AA, bone marrow aspiration smears are hypocellular, showing relative lymphocytosis and absent megakaryocytes. Sternal puncture in children is prohibited.
All patients undergoing AA diagnosis are recommended to undergo a standard cytogenetic study (karyotype) of bone marrow cells and FISH testing for monosomy 7 for differential diagnosis with MDS [24–26].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: FISH testing should be performed using probes most typical for MDS (to detect chromosome 7 abnormalities), despite the absence of cytogenetic aberrations or mitoses in standard cytogenetic testing. The detection of clonal aberrations characteristic of MDS at the onset of pancytopenia, in the presence of other diagnostic criteria for severe and very severe AA and in the absence of genetically proven or clinically probable predisposition syndromes to MDS/AML (e.g., SAMD9, SAMD9L, GATA2, SBDS, etc.), does not rule out the diagnosis of acquired AA, may be transient, and is not a contraindication to IST.
Patients with a family history of hematological disorders (leukemia, thrombocytopenia, aplastic anemia) and/or onset with non-severe, slowly progressive cytopenia are recommended, whenever possible, to undergo molecular genetic testing using high-throughput sequencing with targeted gene panels or Sanger sequencing to identify the most frequent mutations in genes associated with inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) (e.g., Fanconi anemia, dyskeratosis congenita, Shwachman-Diamond syndrome, etc.) and/or MDS/AML predisposition syndromes (e.g., mutations in GATA2, SAMD9, SAMD9L, RUNX1 and other genes). Molecular genetic testing by other methods (whole-exome sequencing (WES), whole-genome sequencing (WGS)) may be performed for differential diagnosis with IBMFS, MDS/AML predisposition syndromes, and primary immunodeficiencies (PIDs) [20,27,28].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: The decision regarding the need for molecular genetic testing in a patient (and a potential donor in case of planned HSCT), as well as the choice of testing method, depends on the examination results, the nature of cytopenia, the turnaround time for genetic test results, the urgency of starting treatment, and the choice of a donor for transplantation. In the absence of laboratory data and/or a proven genetic defect confirming IBMFS, genetic testing of related donors is not indicated and may lead to an unjustified delay in HSCT. It is important to remember that a negative molecular genetic test result does not rule out IBMFS or PID. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to perform genetic testing for patients without clinical, laboratory, or anamnestic risk factors indicating IBMFS, especially if HSCT from a related donor is not planned. The decision should be made individually, taking into account the expected benefit from verifying the genetic diagnosis of IBMFS in a particular patient and the potential treatment delay associated with the duration of certain molecular genetic tests (WES, WGS), as well as the inability to rule out a constitutional defect based on negative genetic test results.
It is recommended that all AA patients with suspected or confirmed febrile neutropenia undergo microbiological (culture) blood testing for sterility [115-118].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: microbiological blood testing is performed prior to the administration of systemic antibacterial drugs. Blood collection is performed from a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) or, in its absence, from a peripheral vein during a febrile temperature spike, an episode of hypothermia, chills, and/or hemodynamic instability, or the appearance of septicopyemic foci. If the patient has a multi-lumen PICC and symptoms of catheter-related infection, blood samples must be drawn from each lumen. Reliable results can be achieved by properly selecting culture bottles and ensuring the correct volume of blood collected for testing: for children up to 10-12 kg, 1-3 ml in pediatric bottles; for children over three years old, 6-10 ml in aerobic bottles (it is most optimal to use an automated blood culture analyzer). If an anaerobic etiology of the infectious process is possible, use anaerobic bottles; if a fungal infection is suspected, use mycotic bottles. To avoid contamination and subsequent false interpretation, strict adherence to aseptic technique during blood collection and inoculation is necessary. To increase test sensitivity, drawing blood two to three times during the first 24 hours of fever is indicated. After verification of the microorganism, further blood tests are performed 24-48 hours after initiating antibacterial therapy and until the first negative result is obtained. Repeated microbiological blood testing is necessary if febrile neutropenia persists for 72 hours, as well as before escalating antibacterial therapy [115-118]. An automated blood culture analyzer is used for microbiological blood testing.
It is recommended that all AA patients with febrile neutropenia, upon a positive microbiological blood test result, undergo antimicrobial susceptibility testing (most optimally by the broth microdilution method – A26.30.004.003, using automated analyzers – A26.30.004.004) to prescribe adequate treatment [115-118].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comment: Considering the increasing incidence of antibiotic resistance, it is necessary to determine susceptibility, including to reserve-group systemic antibacterial drugs, as well as to identify resistance determinants.
It is recommended that all AA patients upon admission to the hospital, as well as before starting specific therapy or surgery, undergo hospital screening – a microbiological (culture) stool test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms to detect colonization of the mucous membrane by gram-negative bacteria resistant to systemic antibacterial drugs [119-122].
GPP BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comments: microbiological tests are performed for precision antibiotic therapy during treatment in the presence of febrile fever and infectious complications.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
All patients undergoing AA diagnosis are recommended to undergo a chest X-ray in the anteroposterior projection, ultrasound examination of the abdominal organs (liver, spleen, and lymph nodes) and kidneys, and pelvic organs in girls to rule out concomitant pathology [16,17,19].
LeR CLoE 5Level of recommendation evidence C (level of data validity – 5)
Patients with AA receiving IST who have suspected infectious complications of IST (primarily in the presence of persistent febrile neutropenia for 72–96 hours, respiratory symptoms such as cough, dyspnea, desaturation, or chest pain) are recommended to undergo chest CT to determine infectious lung damage [29].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Chest CT must be performed upon the development of refractory febrile neutropenia even in the absence of any clinical symptoms from the respiratory system. If signs of pneumonia are detected, tracheobronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) must be performed. The scope of the study should be maximal and, if necessary, include: molecular biological testing for respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, influenza viruses, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza viruses, rhinoviruses, bocavirus, coronaviruses, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Pneumocystis jirovecii, Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, cytomegalovirus; microscopic examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeast and mold) and Mycobacterium tuberculosis; microbiological (culture) testing for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, microbiological (culture) testing for fungi (yeast and mold), Legionella pneumophila; and determination of fungal metabolites (galactomannan). BAL results will have the highest diagnostic value if performed before the initiation of anti-infective therapy.
It should be remembered that X-ray examination of the lungs in patients with neutropenia has low diagnostic utility and is indicated only for the diagnosis of complications such as pneumo- or hydrothorax, hydropericardium, as well as for checking the position of central venous catheters, pleural drains, or endotracheal tubes [123, 140, 145, 146, 149].
It is recommended that all AA patients with febrile neutropenia undergo examinations depending on clinical symptoms: in case of abdominal pain and/or stool retention for more than 3 days – ultrasound examination (ultrasound) of the abdominal organs and kidneys; in the presence of respiratory symptoms such as cough, shortness of breath, desaturation, chest pain – computed tomography (CT) of the chest organs; with signs of sinusitis – CT of the paranasal sinuses and larynx [123].
GPP BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comment: depending on the clinical situation, a comprehensive ultrasound of internal organs, echocardiography (to rule out endocarditis), and duplex scanning of the upper extremity veins in the projection of the central venous catheter (to rule out thrombotic deposits associated with the central venous catheter) are performed. CT or MRI of the abdominal cavity, retroperitoneal space, and small pelvis with contrast (to rule out lesions of internal organs and intestines), esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy (to rule out erosive-ulcerative processes and pathological infiltration)
2.5 Other Procedures
For all female patients with the onset of menstruation during AA diagnosis, it is recommended to consult an obstetrician-gynecologist to rule out comorbid pathology and address the issue of prescribing hormonal medications to stop the menstrual cycle and prevent uterine bleeding [12, 16, 19].
GRC CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
For patients diagnosed with AA in the presence of hemorrhagic syndrome and/or any visual disturbances, it is recommended to consult an ophthalmologist to rule out intraocular hemorrhage [12, 16, 19].
GRC CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
For patients diagnosed with AA in the presence of infectious, hemorrhagic, and other ENT complications, it is recommended to consult an otorhinolaryngologist to diagnose comorbid pathology [12, 16, 19].
GRC CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended that all AA patients with febrile neutropenia and respiratory symptoms (ARI clinical presentation) have nasopharyngeal and Oropharyngeal swabs taken for molecular biological testing for respiratory viruses: respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, influenza viruses, metapneumovirus, parainfluenza viruses, rhinoviruses, bocavirus, coronaviruses, and the novel coronavirus infection COVID-19, including [124–126, 203].
LOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
Comment: testing of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs to detect respiratory viruses by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or detecting antigens by fluorescent antibody methods. It is advisable during the season of increased ARI incidence or in the presence of respiratory symptoms. Testing for the novel coronavirus infection COVID-19 is mandatory in all cases of febrile neutropenia.
It is recommended that all AA patients with febrile neutropenia presenting with symptoms of mucositis, stomatitis, or gingivitis undergo microbiological (culture) examination of the oral cavity discharge, microbiological (culture) examination of mucus from the tonsils and posterior pharyngeal wall for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, as well as molecular biological testing of a nasopharyngeal scrape for herpes simplex virus (Herpes simplex virus) for diagnosis and subsequent etiotropic therapy [182–184].
LOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
It is recommended that all AA patients with febrile neutropenia presenting with diarrhea undergo testing for Clostridioides difficile toxins in stool samples, as well as testing for the following markers of viruses associated with diarrheal syndrome: rotavirus antigens (Rotavirus gr. A) in stool samples or molecular biological testing of stool for rotaviruses (Rotavirus gr. A); norovirus antigens (Norovirus) in stool samples or molecular biological testing of stool for caliciviruses (noroviruses, sapoviruses) (Caliciviridae (Norovirus, Sapovirus)); adenovirus antigens (Adenovirus) in stool samples or molecular biological testing of stool for adenoviruses (Adenovirus) [127–129].
LOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is recommended that all AA patients with febrile neutropenia lasting 7 days or more undergo monitoring of fungal metabolites (galactomannan antigen of Aspergillus species) [130–132].
LOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comment:
Determination of galactomannan in the blood should only be performed in neutropenic patients who are not receiving antifungal prophylaxis active against molds, with a frequency of 2 times a week.
It is recommended that all AA patients with febrile neutropenia and confirmed pneumonia undergo determination of fungal metabolites (galactomannan) in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid [131–133].
LOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comment: If bronchoscopy is not feasible, galactomannan determination can be performed in blood serum.
It is recommended that all AA patients with febrile neutropenia and liver lesions undergo testing for fungal metabolites in the blood (mannan antigen of Candida species) and determination of antibodies to antigens of plant, animal, and chemical origin (antibodies to Candida species) to rule out disseminated/invasive candidiasis [134, 135].
LOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: the combination of febrile neutropenia and focal liver/spleen lesions requires the exclusion of disseminated/invasive candidiasis.
It is recommended that all AA patients with hematological diseases and febrile neutropenia with suspected central nervous system infection undergo testing for Cryptococcus species antigen in the cerebrospinal fluid [136].
LOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment:
Other methods may be used to detect Cryptococcus, including DNA detection and microscopy. Due to the nonspecific clinical and radiological picture, in addition to central nervous system cryptococcal infection, the diagnostic workup must include invasive mycoses, toxoplasmosis, listeriosis, herpes virus infection, and mycobacterioses, including atypical ones.
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
The modern treatment strategy for children with AA includes allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (bone marrow or peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitors mobilized with colony-stimulating factors (L03AA according to the ATC classification, G-CSF)) from an HLA-genoidentical donor or combined IST, which includes two main drugs with pronounced immunosuppressive effects without concomitant myelotoxicity: antithymocyte globulin** (ATG**) and #cyclosporine** (#CsA**) [30–33].
HLA typing of AA patients and siblings should be performed immediately after diagnosis. If a fully matched related donor is available, AA patients should be consulted at a transplant center.
In addition, the pathogenetic therapy of AA patients may include, apart from immunosuppressive drugs (ATG**, #CsA**), medications aimed at activating the proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells – granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and the thrombopoietin receptor agonist eltrombopag. Clinical use of eltrombopag** may be accompanied by a mono-, bi-, or trilineage hematological response in patients with refractory AA, and its use in combination therapy programs for AA patients significantly increases the rate of complete response achievement and overall patient survival [34]. The treatment program may include chelating therapy. Replacement transfusion therapy with red blood cell suspension and platelet concentrate is a fundamental component ensuring patient safety until hematopoiesis recovery [15, 16, 35]. Splenectomy is not indicated in children with AA.
Information on performingallo-HSCT in children with AA is presented in Appendix A3.1.
3.1 Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from an HLA-genoidentical donor
For all children with AA who have an HLA-genoidentical (matched for 9/10 or 10/10 alleles – A, B, C, DRB1, DQB1) donor, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation is recommended (see Appendix A3.1) [30–33, 36].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: transplantation should be performed in a sterile room with HEPA-filtered positive-pressure air. Sterile bed linen must be changed at least once a day or more often if soiled. The patient receives a low-bacterial diet, i.e., thoroughly heat-treated, excluding raw vegetables and fruits, semi-dry smoked products, candies, chips, "live" yogurts and other fermented milk products containing live bacteria, as well as products containing spices and yeast bread.
Bone marrow transplantation is preferred over G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood hematopoietic progenitors [37]. The use of the latter is possible if the donor/legal representatives refuse and if the recipient's body weight significantly exceeds the donor's body weight.
All children with AA after allo-HSCT are recommended to undergo a chimerism analysis on days +30, +100, and +360 post-transplantation, following hematopoietic recovery. Additional chimerism studies are necessary in case of graft function deterioration—i.e., recurrent development of anemia and/or granulocytopenia and/or thrombocytopenia not associated with common causes of graft dysfunction (reactivation of latent cytomegalovirus infection and treatment with ganciclovir**) [19,22,36].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Routine use of G-CSF is not recommended for all children with AA in the post-transplantation period [36].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: in the event of a bacterial infection uncontrolled by systemic antibacterial drugs, any fungal infection, or in the presence of incompletely resolved infectious complications at the start of the conditioning regimen, G-CSF may be prescribed starting from day +5 post-transplantation at a dose of 5 mcg/kg of body weight daily subcutaneously or intravenously.
All children with AA following hematopoietic recovery after allo-HSCT are recommended to undergo chimerism analysis on days +30, +100, and +360 post-transplantation. Additional chimerism studies are required if graft function deteriorates [36].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
3.2 Combined immunosuppressive therapy as the first-line pathogenetic therapy for AA
All children with AA who do not have an HLA-matched sibling donor or if the donor has contraindications to donation are recommended to receive combined immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with horse ATG** at a dose of 40 mg/kg/day for 4 days [36,38,43,110].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
All children with AA undergoing a course of IST are recommended to receive prophylaxis of invasive mycoses with posaconazole** (for children over 13 years of age), voriconazole** (over 2 years of age), itraconazole, or other systemic antifungal drugs Amphotericin B [liposomal] [39].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: administration of systemic antifungal drugs continues until granulocytes rise above 0.5×109/L. Prophylactic administration of co-trimoxazole [Sulfamethoxazole+Trimethoprim]** is not indicated, given the extreme rarity of Pneumocystis pneumonia in IST recipients.
All children with AA undergoing a course of IST are recommended long-term therapy with #cyclosporine** (#CsA**). #CsA** is prescribed from day 1 of the horse ATG** course. The initial dose of the drug is 5 mg/kg/day, orally, divided into 2 doses. Subsequently, the daily dose is adjusted based on individual pharmacokinetics and individual drug tolerance. The target trough (i.e., pre-dose) concentration of #CsA** in whole blood should be 150-300 ng/mL. In the absolute absence of a hematological response (180-200 days from the start of the first ATG** course; 90 days after the second ATG** course), #CsA** is discontinued prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation. Upon achieving any hematological response, #CsA** is continued for at least 18 months and at least 6 months after reaching the plateau of the hematological response. Upon achieving a stable best response, a total therapy duration of at least 18 months, and no increase in blood counts for 6 months, #CsA** is tapered by 5% of the dose every 2 weeks. Complete withdrawal of the drug takes a total of 40 weeks [19,42,47].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: If renal toxicity (elevated urea and creatinine), arterial hypertension uncontrolled by two drugs, or hepatic toxicity develops, #CsA** is stopped completely, regardless of the dose and blood concentration. After complete resolution of toxicity, #CsA** is resumed at a daily dose equal to ½ of the dose at which toxicity developed. If the whole blood #CsA** level rises above 350 ng/mL, the daily dose of #CsA** is reduced to enter the therapeutic window. The average daily dose of #CsA** throughout the treatment course is determined by tolerability and the achieved concentration level. One should not attempt to increase the #CsA** dose to therapeutic levels in case of poor tolerability. If achieving a concentration within the "therapeutic window" is impossible, one should settle for the maximum tolerated dose of the drug.
Administration of G-CSF is not recommended for all children with AA during the course of IST [36].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Patients who started the ATG** course with an incompletely resolved bacterial or fungal infection or who develop such an infection are recommended to receive G-CSF after completing the ATG** course [19,40].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: if granulocytes fail to rise above 0.5×109/L within 42 days, G-CSF is discontinued. If granulocytes rise above 0.5×109/L, the further administration regimen and dosage of G-CSF are selected individually to maintain granulocytes above 0.5×109/L on each day of therapy.
All children with AA undergoing a course of IST, simultaneously with the start of standard IST (from day 1 of ATG), are recommended to receive eltrombopag** therapy at age-appropriate dosages (see the medicinal product's instructions for use, section "First-line therapy for severe aplastic anemia") for 6 months or more upon achieving a hematological response. The use of eltrombopag** in combination therapy regimens for AA patients significantly increases the rate of achieving partial and complete response [41-43].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Patients with AA and post-transfusional iron overload are recommended to receive iron chelation therapy with deferasirox** (contraindicated in patients under 2 years of age) at an initial dose of 10 mg/kg/day, with subsequent gradual dose escalation up to 30 mg/kg/day in the absence of signs of drug toxicity [44].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: iron overload must be confirmed by T2* MRI. When #CsA** and deferasirox** are used concomitantly, there is a high probability of renal dysfunction; therefore, regular monitoring of creatinine and urea levels is required.
3.3 Therapy for refractory forms and relapses of AA
Patients with refractory AA are recommended to receive therapy with #eltrombopag** at age-appropriate dosages (see the medicinal product's instructions for use, section "First-line therapy for severe aplastic anemia") for 6 months or more upon achieving a hematological response [45,46].
GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: the initiation of #eltrombopag** therapy is possible concomitantly with the start of the second ATG** course, or in the absence of an effect from 2 conducted courses of combined IST with horse ATG** combined with #CsA**, and when allo-HSCT from an alternative donor is not feasible. Eltrombopag therapy is also possible both in the presence of single-lineage cytopenia (thrombocytopenia) and pancytopenia to improve the obtained treatment results.
Patients with refractory AA are recommended to undergo a repeated course of therapy with horse ATG** in 3-6 months if the 1st course is ineffective [19,36].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: currently, horse ATG** is also the therapy of choice for a repeated course. An alternative is rabbit ATG** at a course dose of 17.5 mg/kg administered over 5 days.
Patients with confirmed refractoriness to the 1st course of ATG** therapy are recommended to consult at a transplantation center to evaluate the feasibility of allogeneic hematopoietic blood or bone marrow cell transplantation from an unrelated or haploidentical donor [22,36].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Patients with "#cyclosporine** dependence" (worsening of cytopenia/relapse during dose tapering or immediately after complete discontinuation) are recommended to resume #CsA** therapy at the previous dose (see section 3.2 "Combined immunosuppressive therapy as the first-line pathogenetic therapy for AA" of these guidelines) even in the absence of transfusion dependence [33,47].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: if there is no effect after 2-3 months, discuss the issue of administering a course of ATG**.
In patients with AA relapse, it is recommended to administer a repeated course of horse ATG** at the previous dosing regimen [36].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
In patients with AA, systemic corticosteroid therapy is not recommended [12,16].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: glucocorticoid hormone therapy is not pathogenetic for AA. The use of glucocorticoid hormones is advisable only for the prevention of early (anaphylaxis, fever, chills, rashes) and late complications (serum sickness) of ATG** therapy within 14–21 days from the start of the ATG** course.
In patients with AA, when indications are present, it is recommended to administer replacement transfusion therapy with blood components [12,16,35].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: treatment with horse ATG** and #CsA** is impossible without modern replacement transfusion therapy with blood components. First of all, this concerns the use of red blood cell suspension and platelet concentrate, the application algorithm of which is determined by the severity of the disease course, i.e., the severity of anemic and hemorrhagic syndromes and the stage of therapy.
To relieve anemic syndrome in AA, a red blood cell suspension cleared of leukocytes and platelets should be used, taking into account the donor and recipient erythrocyte phenotype. For a single transfusion of donor platelets, the following calculation is used: 1 dose of platelet concentrate (0.5–0.7×1011 platelets) per 10 kg of the patient's body weight, obtained from a single donor. Transfusions are performed before each administration of ATG**, and subsequently depending on the blood platelet count and the presence and severity of hemorrhagic syndrome.
3.4 Supportive care for patients with AA.
In all patients under 18 years of age with AA during treatment, upon the development of anemic syndrome, bleeding, or high risk of hemorrhagic syndrome, it is recommended to provide blood product transfusion support (see Appendix A3.3) [106-108].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Transfusion support is carried out in accordance with Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1170n dated October 28, 2020, "On Approval of the Rules for Providing Medical Care to the Population in the Field of Transfusiology", registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on November 27, 2020, No. 61123, which regulates the procedure for transfusion support of patients in need of such medical care. As an additional guide, methodological guidelines and textbooks describing the algorithm for selecting blood components, dose calculation, and indications for blood transfusion can be used [111].
In all patients under 18 years of age with AA during intensive therapy, it is recommended to place an implantable infusion/injection port/catheter*** [112-114].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: the presence of a central venous catheter providing the ability to monitor central venous pressure, frequent blood sampling, and high fluid administration rates is absolutely necessary at the initial stages of therapy and in high-risk patients receiving intensive treatment, including HSCT.
It is recommended for all patients with AA and febrile neutropenia to initiate empirical therapy with a beta-lactam antibacterial drug (penicillin combinations, including combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors; third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins) with activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, within no more than 60 minutes. The choice of starting therapy depends on the patient's somatic status, screening results and prior infection history, local epidemiological data, and guidelines [115,137-140].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
It is recommended to prescribe 3rd generation cephalosporins (CF) to all patients with AA of the standard risk group [42,43,185].
LOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
It is recommended to prescribe beta-lactam antibacterial drugs (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitors; third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins) as monotherapy to all high-risk AA patients with a stable clinical status (adequate level of consciousness, normal hemodynamic parameters, absence of clinical signs of localized infection). Additionally, an aminoglycoside and/or glycopeptide antibiotic may be prescribed, depending on the clinical picture, local guidelines, and patient colonization [119,121-123,138,141-144].
LOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
Comments: modification of antimicrobial therapy is performed based on clinical symptoms, instrumental, and microbiological test results. If fever persists and patients are clinically stable, it is acceptable to await a clinical response to initial antibacterial therapy within 48–72 hours, as fever is not the sole indicator of the severity of the infectious process. The prescription of carbapenems as first-line systemic antibacterial drugs for febrile neutropenia is justified in patients with severe infections, involvement of the abdominal or perirectal regions, and the development of sepsis.
It is recommended for patients with AA and persistent febrile neutropenia to take into account the results of microbiological (culture) stool tests for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms to prescribe targeted antibacterial therapy. Due to the high mortality rate of AA patients with febrile neutropenia who develop gram-negative sepsis caused by antibiotic-resistant microorganisms (including carbapenems), reserve-group drugs must be prescribed [186-189, 199].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to prescribe the broadest-spectrum beta-lactam antibacterial drugs (carbapenems) in combination with aminoglycosides and vancomycin** at maximum doses—preferably via prolonged infusions due to impaired clearance and fluid redistribution in the body—to patients with AA who develop severe infections, signs of sepsis, or septic shock. For patients colonized with resistant bacteria, reserve-group drugs should be prescribed (according to the antibiogram). In the event of severe infectious complications and/or sepsis, systemic antibacterial drugs are prescribed. Reserve-group drugs include colistimethate sodium, polymyxin B**, tigecycline**, #ceftolozane+[tazobactam]**, ceftazidime+[avibactam]** (in some situations in combination with aztreonam) [186-189,201].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended for all patients with AA who have persistent fever for 96–120 hours despite ongoing first- and second-line empirical antibacterial therapy and in the absence of infection foci, to initiate empirical antifungal therapy [123,145-148].
LOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment Due to the fact that high-risk patients often receive prophylaxis with drugs active against molds, it is necessary to take into account the drug type, dose, route of administration, and, if possible, serum concentration. If the patient received the oral form of these drugs and the blood concentration was therapeutic, they should be discontinued and empirical therapy with other systemic antifungal drugs (caspofungin**, micafungin**, anidulafungin, or Amphotericin B [liposomal]) should be prescribed. In cases where the concentration was subtherapeutic, the oral drug forms should be discontinued, and intravenous voriconazole** should be prescribed to achieve an effective concentration. If persistent fever continues despite achieving a therapeutic blood concentration of voriconazole**, one should switch to the empirical antifungal therapy strategy. Empirical therapy should be continued until the patient recovers from agranulocytosis [148-151]. Amphotericin B** deoxycholate is not used in empirical therapy in children.
In patients with AA, the pre-emptive antifungal therapy strategy is recommended in clinics with the capability to immediately perform a full range of diagnostic procedures (chest CT, bronchoscopy followed by BAL fluid examination, and biopsy if necessary) and is performed in all AA patients with febrile neutropenia and examination findings indicating invasive mycosis [123,147-149].
LOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
In all patients with AA who develop candidemia/invasive candidiasis, it is recommended to prescribe systemic antifungal therapy [137,138,147-150]:
LOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments on antifungal therapy
- Caspofungin** at a dose of 70 mg/m2 – day 1 (maximum 70 mg/day), then 50 mg/m2/day (maximum 50 mg/day) in children over three months of age
- Micafungin** 100 mg once daily intravenously or 2–4 mg/kg/day (for infants in the first month of life, the dose may be increased up to 10 mg/kg/day)
- Anidulafungin at a dose of 200 mg on the first day, followed by 100 mg once daily or 3 mg/kg on the first day, then 1.5 mg/kg/day for children older than one month (drug of choice for patients with hepatic impairment)
- Amphotericin B [liposomal] 3 mg/kg/day (for children older than 1 month)
- Voriconazole** (for children under 12 years and weighing less than 40 kg, loading dose of 18 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses on the first day, then 16 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses; for those older than 12 years, 12 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses on the first day, then 8 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses. Voriconazole** therapy must always be initiated with the intravenous formulation);
- Amphotericin B [lipid complex] 5 mg/kg/day;
In all patients with AA and neutropenia and/or hemodynamic instability, Fluconazole** is not recommended for prescription in [148] .
LOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Upon the development of invasive aspergillosis, immediate initiation of intravenous antifungal therapy is recommended for all patients with AA [50–56].
Level of recommendation 5 (Level of evidence – C).
For children with AA older than two years, voriconazole** is recommended as a first-line drug (therapy is always initiated with intravenous formulations, followed by a switch to the oral route once the process stabilizes) [148, 149, 153].
LOE 4 Level of recommendation C (Level of evidence – 4).
All patients with AA are recommended to undergo therapeutic drug monitoring of serum voriconazole** concentration and maintain it within the range of 1.0–4.0 mcg/ml [195, 196];
LOE 5 Level of recommendation C (Level of evidence – 5).
#Isavuconazole at a loading dose of 10 mg/kg 3 times/day for two days (maximum 200 mg), followed by 10 mg/kg/day intravenously or orally for children aged 1 year and older; for children from 6 months to 1 year, the single dose is 6 mg/kg. Monitoring of serum drug concentration is not required. Due to the lack of approved pediatric indications, it is a second-line therapy drug [197, 198];
Amphotericin B [liposomal] at a dose of 3–5 mg/kg/day (for children older than 1 month);
Amphotericin B [lipid complex] 5 mg/kg/day;
Combination therapy: voriconazole**/amphotericin B** + a drug from the other systemic antifungals group (echinocandins: caspofungin**, micafungin**, anidulafungin)
Therapy is prescribed for a prolonged period (until the resolution of risk factors) – at least 12 weeks. If invasive aspergillosis develops during prior antifungal prophylaxis with triazole derivatives (voriconazole**, posaconazole**), it is necessary to switch the drug class to Amphotericin B [liposomal] / Amphotericin B [lipid complex]. When fungal involvement of the central nervous system, kidneys, or bones develops, voriconazole** and #isavuconazole are the drugs with the best bioavailability. In the event of renal impairment, administration of the intravenous form of voriconazole** is contraindicated. Upon recurrence of risk factors and a previously confirmed invasive mycosis, secondary prophylaxis must be performed. Voriconazole** must be used. [151-154]
It is recommended that all patients with AA immediately receive combination therapy including systemic antifungals and surgical intervention upon the development of invasive mucormycosis [50, 57–59].
LOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments:
Amphotericin B [liposomal] at a dose of 5–10 mg/kg/day (maximum doses are recommended in case of cerebral involvement; for children older than 1 month);
Amphotericin B [lipid complex] at a dose of 5–7.5 mg/kg/day;
#Isavuconazole at a loading dose of 10 mg/kg q8h for two days (maximum 200 mg), followed by 10 mg/kg/day (maximum 200 mg). Therapeutic drug monitoring of serum concentrations is not required. Due to the lack of approved pediatric indications, it is a second-line therapy option [197,198];
Combination therapy with systemic antifungal drugs may be considered as salvage therapy in extremely aggressive cases of the disease or as second-line therapy: amphotericin B [liposomal] or [lipid complex]** + posaconazole** (in children over 13 years of age) or #isavuconazole and/or caspofungin** (in children over three months of age) [202].
Surgical intervention, multidisciplinary patient management approach.
Posaconazole** 15–20 mg/kg/day (up to 800 mg/kg/day in 4 divided doses) in children over 13 years of age. Due to extremely variable pharmacokinetics, therapeutic drug monitoring of serum concentrations is required. The drug is prescribed after the patient stabilizes, including for maintenance treatment and secondary prophylaxis.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
Patients with AA are recommended medical rehabilitation for complications of the underlying disease and the treatment received [48,49].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the scope, duration, and nature of rehabilitation measures depend on the patient's age at the time of initial diagnosis and the timing of rehabilitation, the scope of treatment received (immunosuppressive therapy, allo-HSCT, haplo-HSCT, etc.), and comorbid conditions. Rehabilitation of children with aplastic anemia should begin on the first day of the child's illness and continue after treatment completion at all stages of follow-up.
The tasks of the inpatient stage include comprehensive medical rehabilitation aimed at treating and preventing developing motor deficits in patients, habilitation and socialization: individual physical therapy sessions, hydrokinesiotherapy, kinesiotaping, and psychological rehabilitation. Social work and habilitation are carried out as part of rehabilitation, allowing the patient and their legal representatives to become familiar with changing social environment conditions and adapt the patient to environmental conditions, physical and psycho-emotional stress after completing intensive inpatient treatment.
The program involves educators (preschool and school education), social workers, medical psychologists, and physicians of various specialties (medical rehabilitation specialists, neurologists, ophthalmologists, etc.).
Rehabilitation is carried out in accordance with the existing Procedure in 3 stages. The frequency of rehabilitation measures at the 2nd and 3rd stages of rehabilitation depends on the patient's status.
Dispensaergic follow-up (clinical observation) of patients is carried out in accordance with Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 629n dated June 10, 2021.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
There are currently no methods for preventing AA.
All patients with AA are recommended to undergo dispensary follow-up by a hematologist for early diagnosis of relapses, clonal complications, and timely initiation of their treatment [8,9,12].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the frequency of monitoring patients with AA after treatment completion is not regulated. During the first year after treatment completion, the patient must be monitored by a hematologist at least once every 3 months. Thereafter, the frequency of monitoring is determined by the hematologist individually, depending on the general condition and well-being of the patient, complications of the therapy received, and the achieved response to therapy, but should not be less than once a year. During follow-up, in addition to physical examination, medical history taking, and symptom assessment, a complete blood count with differential leukocyte count must be performed. Other diagnostic methods may be used at the hematologist's discretion if indicated. To assess clonal evolution to PNH, MDS/AML, the size of the PNH clone in the blood is monitored, and bone marrow aspiration analysis using morphological and cytogenetic examinations is performed once a year.
It should be noted that the patient may have atypical disease manifestations, as well as a combination of a specific disease with other pathologies, which may dictate changes by the attending physician in the algorithm for choosing the optimal diagnostic and treatment tactics.
6. Organization of Medical Care
Indications for planned hospitalization:
1) Administration of a course of ATG** therapy;
2) Bone marrow transplantation;
3) Prophylactic transfusions of donor blood components;
4) Patient evaluation, including biopsies and invasive procedures, when it cannot be performed on an outpatient basis;
5) Elective surgery.
Indications for emergency hospitalization:
1) Development of infectious and/or hemorrhagic complications;
2) Severe thrombocytopenia and/or anemia requiring emergency replacement transfusions.
Indications for patient discharge from the hospital:
1) Following a course of ATG** or bone marrow transplantation – outpatient or short-term inpatient monitoring;
2) Complete management of hemorrhagic and/or infectious complications;
3) Completed set of diagnostic and therapeutic measures.
7. Additional Information
Absent
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria | Performance assessment (yes/no) |
|---|---|---|
1. | A patient with suspected aplastic anemia underwent a complete (clinical) blood count with differential | Yes/no |
2. | A patient with established aplastic anemia underwent a complete (clinical) blood count with differential 2 times a week until treatment response is achieved, and then 1 time a month | Yes/no |
3. | A patient with suspected aplastic anemia underwent bone marrow aspiration to obtain a cytological specimen from the anterior or posterior iliac crests, followed by a cytological examination of the bone marrow smear (myelogram) | Yes/no |
4. | A patient with suspected aplastic anemia underwent cytogenetic analysis of bone marrow cells | Yes/no |
5. | A patient with established aplastic anemia who is not a candidate for bone marrow transplantation and has no contraindications to immunosuppressive therapy received combination immunosuppressive therapy | Yes/no |
6. | A patient with established aplastic anemia and their siblings underwent HLA typing before starting therapy | Yes/no |
References
Show references
Isidori A. et al. Iron toxicity - Its effect on the bone marrow. // Blood Rev. England, 2018. Vol. 32, № 6. P. 473–479.
Marsh J.C.W., Kulasekararaj A.G. Management of the refractory aplastic anemia patient: what are the options? // Blood. 2013. Vol. 122, № 22. P. 3561–3567.
Frickhofen N. et al. Antithymocyte globulin with or without cyclosporin A: 11-Year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing treatments of aplastic anemia // Blood. 2003. Vol. 101, № 4. P. 1236–1242.
Kulasekararaj A.G. et al. Somatic mutations identify a subgroup of aplastic anemia patients who progress to myelodysplastic syndrome // Blood. 2014. Vol. 124, № 17. P. 2698–2704.
Afable M.G., Tiu R. V, Maciejewski J.P. Clonal Evolution in Aplastic Anemia // Hematology. 2011. № 1. P. 90–95.
Pu J.J. et al. Natural history of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clones in patients presenting as aplastic anemia // Eur. J. Haematol. 2011. Vol. 87, № 1. P. 37–45.
Socié G. et al. Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria: long-term follow-up and prognostic factors // Lancet. 1996. Vol. 348, № 9027. P. 573–577.
Kulagin A. et al. Prognostic value of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria clone presence in aplastic anaemia patients treated with combined immunosuppression: Results of two-centre prospective study // Br. J. Haematol. 2014. Vol. 164, № 4. P. 546–554.
Li Y. et al. Long-term follow-up of clonal evolutions in 802 aplastic anemia patients: A single-center experience // Ann. Hematol. 2011. Vol. 90, № 5. P. 529–537.
Kulagin A.D. et al. National clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria // Oncohematology. 2014. Vol. 2. P. 20–28.
Kaufman D.W. et al. Relative incidence of agranulocytosis and aplastic anemia // Am. J. Hematol. 2006.
Killick S.B. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult aplastic anaemia. // Br. J. Haematol. England, 2016. Vol. 172, № 2. P. 187–207.
Dokal I. Dyskeratosis congenita. // Hematology. 2011. Vol. 2011. P. 480–486.
Soulier J. Fanconi anemia. // Hematology Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program. 2011. Vol. 2011. P. 492–497.
Marsh J.C.W. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aplastic anaemia // Br. J. Haematol. 2009. Vol. 147, № 1. P. 43–70.
Mikhailova E.A., Savchenko V.G. Programmed treatment protocol for patients with aplastic anemia: combination immunosuppressive therapy // Programmed Treatment of Blood System Diseases / ed. by V.G. Savchenko. Moscow: Praktika, 2012. P. 135–150.
Peslak S.A., Olson T., Babushok D. V. Diagnosis and Treatment of Aplastic Anemia // Current Treatment Options in Oncology. Springer New York LLC, 2017. Vol. 18, № 12.
Nielsen P. et al. Iron Stores in Patients with Myelodysplasia and Aplastic Anemia. // Blood. 2006. Vol. 108, № 11. P. 3726–3726.
Pediatric Hematology. Clinical Guidelines / ed. Rumyantsev A.G., Maschan A.A., Zhukovskaya E.V. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2015. 656 p.
Alter B.P. Diagnosis, genetics, and management of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. // Hematology. 2007. P. 29–39.
de Latour R.P., Risitano A.M., Dufour C. Severe Aplastic Anemia and PNH // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 579–587.
Barone A. et al. Diagnosis and management of acquired aplastic anemia in childhood. Guidelines from the Marrow Failure Study Group of the Pediatric Haemato-Oncology Italian Association (AIEOP) // Blood Cells, Mol. Dis. Elsevier B.V., 2015. Vol. 55, № 1. P. 40–47.
Frisch B., Lewis S.M. The bone marrow in aplastic anaemia: diagnostic and prognostic features // J. Clin. Pathol. 1974. Vol. 27, № 3. P. 231–241.
Maciejewski J.P., Mufti G.J. Whole genome scanning as a cytogenetic tool in hematologic malignancies // Blood. 2008. Vol. 112, № 4. P. 965–974.
Maciejewski J.P. et al. Distinct clinical outcomes for cytogenetic abnormalities evolving from aplastic anemia // Blood. 2002. Vol. 99, № 9. P. 3129–3135.
Gupta V. et al. Clinical relevance of cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis of acquired aplastic anaemia in adults // Br. J. Haematol. 2006. Vol. 134, № 1. P. 95–99.
Babushok D.V., Bessler M., Olson T.S. Genetic predisposition to myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia in children and young adults // Leuk Lymphoma. 2016. Vol. 57, № 3. P. 520–536.
Shimano K.A. et al. Diagnostic work-up for severe aplastic anemia in children: Consensus of the North American Pediatric Aplastic Anemia Consortium // Hematology. 2021. Vol. 96, № 11. P. 1491–1504.
Zar H.J., Andronikou S., Nicol M.P. Advances in the diagnosis of pneumonia in children // BMJ. British Medical Journal Publishing Group, 2017. Vol. 358.
Mikhailova EA, et al. Combined immunosuppressive therapy in patients with aplastic anemia: repeated courses of antithymocyte globulin // HEMATOLOGY AND TRANSFUSIOLOGY. 2014. Vol. 59, № 4. P. 11–18.
Young N.S., Bacigalupo A., Marsh J.C.W. Aplastic Anemia: Pathophysiology and Treatment // Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010. Vol. 16, № 1. P. S119–S125.
Bacigalupo A. How I treat acquired aplastic anemia // Blood. 2017. Vol. 129, № 11. P. 1428–1436.
Scheinberg P., Young N.S. How I treat acquired aplastic anemia. // Blood. 2012. Vol. 120, № 6. P. 1185–1196.
Desmond R. et al. Eltrombopag restores trilineage hematopoiesis in refractory severe aplastic anemia that can be sustained on discontinuation of drug // Blood. 2014. Vol. 123, № 12. P. 1818–1825.
Kelsey P. et al. Guidelines for the use of platelet transfusions // Br. J. Haematol. 2003. Vol. 122, № 1. P. 10–23.
Hartung H.D., Olson T.S., Bessler M. Acquired Aplastic Anemia in Children // Pediatr. Clin. North Am. NIH Public Access, 2013. Vol. 60, № 6. P. 1311.
Bacigalupo A. et al. Bone marrow versus peripheral blood as the stem cell source for sibling transplants in acquired aplastic anemia: Survival advantage for bone marrow in all age groups // Haematologica. Haematologica, 2012. Vol. 97, № 8. P. 1142–1148.
Scheinberg P. et al. Horse versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin in acquired aplastic anemia // N. Engl. J. Med. 2011. Vol. 365, № 5. P. 430–438.
Chen M. et al. Posaconazole as primary prevention of fungal infection in intensive immunosuppressive therapy for severe aplastic anemia // Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2018. Vol. 39, № 2. P. 128–131.
Valdez J.M. et al. Infections in patients with aplastic anemia // Semin. Hematol. Semin Hematol. 2009. Vol. 46, № 3. P. 269–276.
Townsley D.M. et al. Eltrombopag added to standard immunosuppression for aplastic anemia // N. Engl. J. Med. 2017. Vol. 376, № 16. P. 1540–1550.
Goronkova O. et al. Efficacy of combined immunosuppression with or without eltrombopag in children with newly diagnosed aplastic anemia // Blood Adv. 2023. Vol. 7, № 6. P. 953–962.
Guo H. et al. Safety and efficacy of eltrombopag in patients with aplastic anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // Hematology. 2024. Vol. 29, № 1; 2335419.
Lee J.W. et al. Iron chelation therapy with deferasirox in patients with aplastic anemia: A subgroup analysis of 116 patients from the EPIC trial // Blood. 2010. Vol. 116, № 14. P. 2448–2454.
Hong Y. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Eltrombopag for Aplastic Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. // Clin. Drug Investig. 2019. Vol. 39, № 2. P. 141–156.
Goronkova O.V. et al. Use of eltrombopag in children and young adults with acquired aplastic anemia // Voprosy Gematologii/Onkologii i Immunopatologii v Pediatrii. 2017. Vol. 16, № 2. P. 17–25.
Bogacheva N.Yu., Shneyder M.M., Maschan A.A. "Cyclosporine dependence" in the treatment of severe aplastic anemia in children // Gematologiya i Transfuziologiya. 1996. Vol. 41, № 2. P. 18–21.
Sanders J.E. et al. Late effects among pediatric patients followed for nearly 4 decades after transplantation for severe aplastic anemia // Blood. 2011. Vol. 118, № 5. P. 1421-1428.
L’Hotta A.J. et al. Clinical practice guideline and expert consensus recommendations for rehabilitation among children with cancer: A systematic review // CA Cancer J Clin. 2023. Vol. 73, № 5. P. 524-545.
Ayuk F., Balduzzi A. Donor Selection for Adults and Pediatrics // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 87–99.
Carreras E., Rambaldi A. Evaluation and Counseling of Candidates // EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 77–87.
Confer D.L., Miller J.P., Chell J.W. Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood Cell Donors and Donor Registries // Thomas’ Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016. Vol. 1–2. P. 423–432.
Witt V., Peters C. Collection of HSC in Children // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 123–127.
Gorin N.C. Bone Marrow Harvesting for HSCT // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 109–117.
Hübel K. Mobilization and Collection of HSC // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 117–123.
Querol S., Rocha V. Procurement and Management of Cord Blood // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 131–137.
Wuchter P. Processing, Cryopreserving and Controlling the Quality of HSCs // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 127–131.
Schumm M., Lang P., Handgretinger R. Graft Manipulation // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 137–143.
Nagler A., Shimoni A. Conditioning // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 99–109.
Danylesko I., Shimoni A., Nagler A. Treosulfan-based conditioning before hematopoietic SCT: more than a BU look-alike // Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012 471. Nature Publishing Group, 2011. Vol. 47, № 1. P. 5–14.
Ruutu T. How to use busulfan in conditioning for allogeneic transplantation // Cell. Ther. Transplant. Universitatsklinikum Hamburg - Eppendorf, 2018. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 18–20.
Langenhorst J.B. et al. Population Pharmacokinetics of Fludarabine in Children and Adults during Conditioning Prior to Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation // Clin. Pharmacokinet. Springer, 2019. Vol. 58, № 5. P. 627.
Yoshida N. et al. Conditioning regimen for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in children with acquired bone marrow failure: fludarabine/melphalan vs. fludarabine/cyclophosphamide // Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 557. Nature Publishing Group, 2020. Vol. 55, № 7. P. 1272–1281.
Penack O. et al. Prophylaxis and management of graft versus host disease after stem-cell transplantation for haematological malignancies: updated consensus recommendations of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation // The Lancet Haematology. Elsevier Ltd, 2020. Vol. 7, № 2. P. e157–e167.
Michonneau D., Socié G. GVHD Prophylaxis (Immunosuppression) // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 177–183.
Watanabe N. et al. Relationship between tacrolimus blood concentrations and clinical outcome during the first 4 weeks after SCT in children // Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 457. Nature Publishing Group, 2009. Vol. 45, № 7. P. 1161–1166.
Jacoby E. et al. Single agent post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as GVHD prophylaxis after HLA-matched related BMT for pediatric and young adult patients with hematologic malignancies // Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. NIH Public Access, 2016. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 112.
Baron F. et al. Anti-thymocyte globulin as graft-versus-host disease prevention in the setting of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a review from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation // Haematologica. Ferrata Storti Foundation, 2017. Vol. 102, № 2. P. 224.
Koreth J. et al. Bortezomib-based immunosuppression after reduced-intensity conditioning hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: randomized phase II results // Haematologica. Ferrata Storti Foundation, 2018. Vol. 103, № 3. P. 522–530.
Wertheimer T. et al. Abatacept as salvage therapy in chronic graft-versus-host disease—a retrospective analysis // Ann. Hematol. 2021. Vol. 100, № 3. P. 779–787.
Drobyski W.R. et al. Tocilizumab for the Treatment of Steroid Refractory Graft-versus-Host Disease // Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. Elsevier, 2011. Vol. 17, № 12. P. 1862–1868.
Abouelnasr A. et al. Defining the Role of Sirolimus in the Management of Graft-versus-Host Disease: From Prophylaxis to Treatment // Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013. Vol. 19. P. 12–21.
Schäfer H. et al. A prospective single-center study on CNI-free GVHD prophylaxis with everolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil in allogeneic HCT // Ann. Hematol. 2021 1008. Springer, 2021. Vol. 100, № 8. P. 2095–2103.
Malard F. et al. Rituximab-based first-line treatment of cGVHD after allogeneic SCT: results of a phase 2 study // Blood. Content Repository Only!, 2017. Vol. 130, № 20. P. 2186–2195.
Cutler C., Antin J.H. Manifestations and Treatment of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease // Thomas’ Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016. Vol. 2–2. P. 1012–1025.
Toubai T., Magenau J. Immunopathology and biology-based treatment of steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease // Blood. American Society of Hematology, 2020. Vol. 136, № 4. P. 429–440.
Martin P.J. How I treat steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease // Blood. American Society of Hematology, 2020. Vol. 135, № 19. P. 1630–1638.
Nassar A. et al. Methotrexate for the Treatment of Graft-versus-Host Disease after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation // J. Transplant. Hindawi Limited, 2014. Vol. 2014. P. 1–10.
Kawashima N. et al. Prophylaxis and treatment with mycophenolate mofetil in children with graft-versus-host disease undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a nationwide survey in Japan // Int. J. Hematol. 2019 1094. Springer, 2019. Vol. 109, № 4. P. 491–498.
Khandelwal P. et al. The successful use of alemtuzumab for treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease in pediatric patients // Pediatr. Transplant. Pediatr Transplant, 2014. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 94–102.
Vicent M.G. et al. Ruxolitinib treatment for steroid refractory acute and chronic graft vs host disease in children: Clinical and immunological results // Am. J. Hematol. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2019. Vol. 94, № 3. P. 319–326.
Faraci M. et al. Etanercept as Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Pediatric Patients // Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. Elsevier, 2019. Vol. 25, № 4. P. 743–748.
Sleight B.S. et al. Infliximab for GVHD therapy in children // Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007 405. Nature Publishing Group, 2007. Vol. 40, № 5. P. 473–480.
Albert M.H. et al. Oral graft vs. host disease in children - Treatment with topical tacrolimus ointment // Pediatr. Transplant. Pediatr Transplant, 2007. Vol. 11, № 3. P. 306–309.
Zangrilli A. et al. Treatment of disfiguring chronic graft versus host disease in a child with topical pimecrolimus // Pediatr. Int. Pediatr Int, 2010. Vol. 52, № 3. P. e161-3.
Baird K. et al. Imatinib Mesylate for the Treatment of Steroid-Refractory Sclerotic-Type Cutaneous Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease // Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2015. Vol. 21, № 6. P. 1083–1090.
Wolff D., Lawitschka A. Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 331–347.
Filipovich A.H. et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. diagnosis and staging working group report // Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant, 2005. Vol. 11, № 12. P. 945–956.
Jagasia M.H. et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: I. The 2014 Diagnosis and Staging Working Group Report // Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. Elsevier Inc., 2015. Vol. 21, № 3. P. 389-401.e1.
Mikulska M. Infection Control and Isolation Procedures // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 189–197.
Mikulska M. Neutropenic Fever // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 259–265.
Ljungman P., Styczynski J., Einsele H. Viral Infections // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 281–291.
Maertens J.A. Invasive Fungal Infections // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 273–281.
Groll A.H. et al. Fourth European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-4): Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of invasive fungal diseases in paediatric patients with cancer or allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation // The Lancet Oncology. Lancet Publishing Group, 2014. Vol. 15, № 8.
Cesaro S. Haemorrhagic Cystitis and Renal Dysfunction // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 387–393.
Carreras E., Diaz-Ricart M. Early Complications of Endothelial Origin // EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 315–323.
Mahadeo K.M. et al. Diagnosis, grading, and treatment recommendations for children, adolescents, and young adults with sinusoidal obstructive syndrome: an international expert position statement // The Lancet Haematology. Elsevier Ltd, 2020. Vol. 7, № 1. P. e61–e72.
Sung L. et al. Guideline for the prevention of oral and oropharyngeal mucositis in children receiving treatment for cancer or undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation // BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care. BMJ Publishing Group, 2017. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 7–16.
Ghali M.G.Z. et al. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in pediatric patients: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management // Leukemia and Lymphoma. Taylor and Francis Ltd, 2019. Vol. 60, № 10. P. 2365–2372.
Cooke K.R. Acute lung injury after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: From the clinic, to the bench and back again // Pediatr. Transplant. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005. Vol. 9, № SUPPL. 7. P. 25–36.
Jodele S. et al. New approaches in the diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation-associated thrombotic microangiopathy // Transfusion and Apheresis Science. Elsevier Ltd, 2016. Vol. 54, № 2. P. 181–190.
Baumgartner A., Schuetz P. Nutritional Support // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 171–177.
Schrezenmeier H. et al. Transfusion Support // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 163–171.
Bahar B., Tormey C.A. Prevention of transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease with blood product irradiation the past, present, and future // Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. College of American Pathologists, 2018. Vol. 142, № 5. P. 662–667.
Oken M.M. et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group // Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1982. Vol. 5, № 6. P. 649–655.
Ye M. et al. Effectiveness of exercise rehabilitation on aplastic anemia patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial // Trials. – 2024. – Vol. 25. – №. 1. – P. 361.
Bercovitz RS., Josephson CD. Transfusion considerations in pediatric hematology and oncology patients. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2016; 30(3): 695-709. doi: 10.106/j.hoc.2016.01.010.
Steiner ME, Zantek ND, Stanworth SJ, Parker RI, et al. Recommendations on RBC Transfusion Support in Children With Hematologic and Oncologic Diagnoses From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;19(9S Suppl 1): 149-156.
Shah N., Andrews J., Goodnough LT. Transfusions for anemia in adult and pediatric patients with malignancies. Blood Reviews. 2015; 29(5): 291-299. doi: 10.106/j.blre.2015.02.001
Yoshimi A. et al. Comparison of the efficacy of rabbit and horse antithymocyte globulin for the treatment of severe aplastic anemia in children // Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology. – 2013. – Vol. 121. – №. 5. – P. 860-861.
Trakhtman P.E., Starostin N.N., Novichkova G.A., Vorozhtsov I.N. Transfusion therapy in clinical practice: study guide / Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology. Moscow, 2021. 76 p.
Rumyantsev A.G., Maschan A.A., Samochatova E.V. Supportive care and infection control in hematological and oncological diseases. Moscow: MEDPRAKTIKA-M, 2009. 448 p.
Rumyantsev A.G. Federal clinical guidelines for the organization of optimal venous access in children with hematological, oncological, and immunological diseases. / A.G. Rumyantsev, A.A. Maschan, D.Sh. Bikkulova. – 2015.
Venous catheter. Use, maintenance, monitoring, management of complications: study guide / Satsuk A.V., Solopova G.G., Shchukin V.V., Litvinov D.V., Pimenova O.V., Klimova N.A., Shchemelinskaya Yu.L., Maschan A.A., Novichkova G.A. – M.: JSC "Informatika", 2023. - 152 p.: ill. ISBN 978-5-6049537-2-3. 115. Erin Gatza et al. Prevention and treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease in children, adolescents and young adults. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2020; May; 26(5): e101-e112.
Simon A. et al. Surveillance of bloodstream infections in pediatric cancer centers – what have we learned and how do we move on? // GMS Hyg Infect Control. German Medical Science, 2016. Vol. 11. P. Doc11.
Bard J.D., TeKippe E.M.E. Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections in Children // J Clin Microbiol. J Clin Microbiol, 2016. Vol. 54, № 6. P. 1418–1424.
Petty L.A. et al. Repeated Blood Cultures in Pediatric Febrile Neutropenia: Would Following the Guidelines Alter the Outcome? // Pediatr Blood Cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2016. Vol. 63, № 7. P. 1244–1249.
Scheler M. et al. Management of children with fever and neutropenia: results of a survey in 51 pediatric cancer centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland // Infection. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2020. Vol. 48, № 4. P. 607–618.
Vehreschild M.J.G.T. et al. A multicentre cohort study on colonization and infection with ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in high-risk patients with haematological malignancies // J Antimicrob Chemother. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2014. Vol. 69, № 12. P. 3387–3392.
Jaiswal S.R. et al. Gut Colonization with Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Adversely Impacts the Outcome in Patients with Hematological Malignancies: Results of A Prospective Surveillance Study // Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. Catholic University in Rome, 2018. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 2018025.
Girmenia C. et al. Incidence, Risk Factors and Outcome of Pre-engraftment Gram-Negative Bacteremia After Allogeneic and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Italian Prospective Multicenter Survey // Clin Infect Dis. Clin Infect Dis, 2017. Vol. 65, № 11. P. 1884–1896.
Klastersky J., Awada A, Paesmans M, Aoun M. Febrile neutropenia: a critical review of the initial management. CID, 2004; 39(1): 32-37
Morrissey C., Gilroy N., Macesic N., Walker P., Nanda-Rajah M. et al. Consensus guidelines for the use of empiric and diagnostic-driven antifungal treatment strategies in haematological malignancy, 2014. Intern Med J, 2014; 44: 1298–1314.
Soderman M. et al Frequent respiratory viril infections in children with febrile neutropenia – a prospective follow-up study/ PLoS One 2016;11(6):1-13. Cahuapaza-Gutierrez N.L. “Aplastic anemia in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic:infection,vaccination,and pathophysiologic mechanisms”. Ann Hematol 2024 doi.org/10.1007/s00277-024-06052-9
Barr R.S., Drysdale S.B. Viral respiratory tract infections in the immunocompromised child. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2023;42(5):170-172. Pawelec K. et al “Respiratory and systemic infections in children with severe aplastic anemia on immunosuppressive therapy” Adv Exp Med Biol 2013:788:417-25
Solopova GG, Tsyganova EV, Kondrashova AV, Gordeeva GN, Rozantseva EV, Begunova SV, Voronin KA, Koposova AO, Novichkova GA. "Features of the course of the novel coronavirus infection COVID-19 in children with oncological, oncohematological, and severe immunological diseases. Experience of the Dmitry Rogachev NMRC PHOI". Voprosy gematologii/onkologii i immunopatologii v pediatrii 2021 v.20 №4: 89-99
Spruit J L, Knight T, Sweeney C, Salimnia H, Savaşan S. Clostridium difficile infection in a children's hospital with specific patterns among pediatric oncology and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation populations Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2020 Apr;37(3):211-222. doi: 10.1080/08880018.2019.1711473
Tai E, Richardson LC, Townsend J, Howard E, Mcdonald LC Clostridium difficile infection among children with cancer Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011 Jul;30(7):610-2.
Castagnola E., Ruberto E., Guarino A. Gastrointestinal and liver infections in children undergoing antineoplastic chemotherapy in the years 2000 // World J Gastroenterol. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 2016. Vol. 22, № 25. P. 5853.
Maertens J.A. et al. Optimization of the cutoff value for the Aspergillus double-sandwich enzyme immunoassay // Clin Infect Dis. Clin Infect Dis, 2007. Vol. 44, № 10. P. 1329–1336.
Lehrnbecher T, Robinson PD, Fisher BT, Castagnola E, Groll AH, Steinbach WJ, Zaoutis TE, Negeri ZF, Beyene J, Phillips B, Sung L. Galactomannan, β-D-Glucan, and Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Assays for the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Disease in Pediatric Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Nov 15;63(10):1340-1348. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw592
Warris A , Lehrnbecher T Progress in the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Disease in Children Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2017;11(2):35-44. doi: 10.1007/s12281-017-0274-9.
Gupta A, Capoor MR, Shende T, Sharma B, Mohindra R, Suri JC, Gupta DK. Comparative evaluation of galactomannan test with bronchoalveolar lavage and serum for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in patients with hematological malignancies. J Lab Physicians. 2017 Oct-Dec;9(4):234-238. doi: 10.4103/JLP.JLP_127_16.
Mikulska M, Calandra T, Sanguinetti M, Poulain D, Viscoli C. The use of mannan antigen and anti-mannan antibodies in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis: recommendations from the Third European Conference on Infections in Leukemia. Crit Care. 2010;14(6):R222. doi: 10.1186/cc9365
Duettmann W, Koidl C, Krause R, Lackner G, Woelfler A, Hoenigl M. Specificity of mannan antigen and anti-mannan antibody screening in patients with haematological malignancies at risk for fungal infection. Mycoses. 2016 Jun;59(6):374-8. doi: 10.1111/myc.12482
Chang CC, Harrison TS, Bicanic TA, Chayakulkeeree M, Sorrell TC, Warris A, et al. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of cryptococcosis: an initiative of the ECMM and ISHAM in cooperation with the ASM. . Lancet Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 9:S1473-3099(23)00731-4. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00731-4.
Lehrnbecher T, Robinson P, Fisher B, Alexander S, Ammann RA, et al. Guideline for the Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Children With Cancer and Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation Recipients: 2017 Update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 20;35(18):2082-2094. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.7017
Lehrnbecher T. et al. Guideline for the Management of Fever and Neutropenia in Pediatric Patients With Cancer and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients: 2023 Update // J Clin Oncol. J Clin Oncol, 2023. Vol. 41, № 9. P. 1774–1785.
Lehrnbecher T. et al. 8th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia: 2020 guidelines for the use of antibiotics in paediatric patients with cancer or post-haematopoietic cell transplantation // Lancet Oncol. Lancet Oncol, 2021. Vol. 22, № 6. P. e270–e280.
Solopova G.G., Novichkova G.A. Experience in implementing an empirical antibiotic therapy algorithm for febrile neutropenia at the Center for Pediatric Hematology/Oncology // Voprosy Gematologii/Onkologii i Immunopatologii v Pediatrii. 2017. Vol. 16, № 3. P. 35–47.
Averbuch D, Orasch C, Cordonnier C, Livermore DM, Mikulska M, Viscoli C et al. European guidelines for empirical antibacterial therapy for febrile neutropenic patients in the era of growing resistance: summary of the 2011 4th European Conference of Infections in Leukemia. Haematologica 2013; 98 (12): 1826-1835
Hakim H, Flynn PM, Knapp KM, Srivastava DK, Gaur AH. Etiology and clinical course of febrile neutropenia in children with cancer. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol, 2009; 31(9): 623-629
Tam CS, O'Reilly M, Andresen D, Lingaratnam S, Kelly A, Burbury K et al. Use of empiric antimicrobial therapy in neutripenic fever. Intern Med J, 2011; 41: 90-101
Lehrnbecher T, Phillips R, Alexander S, Alvaro F, Carlesse F, Fisher B et al. Guidelines for the management of fever and neutropenia in children with cancer and/or undergoing hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. J Clin Oncol, 2012; 30(35): 4427-4438
Ruhnke M and Schwartz S. Recent developments in the management of invasive fungal infections in patients with oncohematological diseases. Ther Adv Hematol, 2016; 7(6): 345–359
Tissot F., Agrawai S., Pagano L., Petrikkos G., Groll A.H. et al. ECIL-6 Guidelines for the Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis, Aspergillosis and Mucormycosis in Liekemia and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients. Hematologica, 2017; 102: 433-444
Cordonnier C, Pautas C, Maury S, Vekhoff A, Farhat H et al. Empirical versus antifungal therapy for high-risk, febrile, neutropenic patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis, 2009; 48:1042–1051
Groll AH, Pana D, Lanternier F, Mesini A, Ammann RA8th European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia: 2020 guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of invasive fungal diseases in paediatric patients with cancer or post-haematopoietic cell transplantation. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jun;22(6):e254-e269. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30723-3
Solopova G.G., Maschan A.A., Novichkova G.G. «2020 Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of invasive aspergillosis in children with oncohematological diseases». Voprosy gematologii/onkologii i immunopatologii. 2020; 19(1): 158-166
Dolton MJ, Ray JE, Chen Sh.A., Ng K., Pont LG and McLachlan AJ. Multicenter study of voriconasol pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2012; 59(9): 4793-4799
Dolton MJ, Ray JE, Chen Sh.A., Ng K., Pont LG and McLachlan AJ. Multicenter study of posaconazole therapeutic drug monitoring: exposure-response relationship and factors affecting concentration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2012; 56(11): 5503-5510
De Pauw B., Walsh T.J., Donnelly J.P., Stevens E.E., Edwards J.E. et al. Revised Definitions of Invasive Fungal Disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis, 2008; 46(12): 1813-1821
Patterson TF, Thompson GR, Denning DW, Fishman JA, Hadley S et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aspergillosis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis, 2016; 63(4): e1 – e60
Cordonnier C., Rovira M., Maertens J., Olavarria E., Faucher C. et al. () Voriconazole for secondary prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients: Results of the VOSIFI study. Haematologica, 2010; 95: 1762–1768
Dulley FL, Vigorito AC, Aranha FJ, et al. Addition of low-dose busulfan to cyclophosphamide in aplastic anemia patients prior to allogeneic bone marrow transplantation to reduce rejection. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004;33(1):9-13. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1704325
Xu LP, Zhang XH, Wang FR, et al. Haploidentical transplantation for pediatric patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52(3):381-387. doi:10.1038/bmt.2016.28
Kharya G et al. Impact of Conditioning Regimen and Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis on The Outcome of Haploidentical Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Severe Aplastic Anemia in Children and Young Adults: A Report from the Pediatric Severe Aplastic Anemia Consortium of India. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Mar;29(3):199.e1-199.e10.
Chen X, Wei J, Huang Y, et al. Effect of Antithymocyte Globulin Source on Outcomes of HLA-Matched Sibling Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018;24(1):86-90.
Samarasinghe S, Veys P, Vora A, Wynn R. Paediatric amendment to adult BSH Guidelines for aplastic anaemia. Br J Haematol. 2018;180(2):201-205. doi:10.1111/bjh.15066
Ratanatharathorn V, et alet al. Phase III Study Comparing Methotrexate and Tacrolimus (Prograf, FK506) With Methotrexate and Cyclosporine for Graft-Versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis After HLA-Identical Sibling Bone Marrow Transplantation. Blood, 1998 Vol. 7, № 1. P. 2303-14]
Storb R. et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial of graft-versus-host disease prevention by methotrexate/cyclosporine versus methotrexate alone in patients given marrow grafts for severe aplastic anemia. // Blood. United States, 1994. Vol. 83, № 9. P. 2749–2750.
Locatelli F. et al. Cyclosporin A and short-term methotrexate versus cyclosporin A as graft versus host disease prophylaxis in patients with severe aplastic anemia given allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-identical sibling: Results of a GITMO/EBMT randomized // Blood. The American Society of Hematology, 2000. Vol. 96, № 5. P. 1690–1697.
Boelens JJ. et al. GVHD Prophilaxis // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Sureda A. et al. Springer, 2024. P. 219–228.
Holler E. et al. Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Sureda A. et al. Springer, 2024. P. 385–394.
Nash R.A. et al. Phase 3 study comparing methotrexate and tacrolimus with methotrexate and cyclosporine for prophylaxis of acute graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation from unrelated donors
Klein OR, Buddenbaum J, Tucker N, et al. Nonmyeloablative Haploidentical Bone Marrow Transplantation with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide for Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017;23(2):325–32
Xu L.P. et al. A novel protocol for haploidentical hematopoietic SCT without in vitro T-cell depletion in the treatment of severe acquired aplastic anemia // Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012. Vol. 47, № 12. P. 1507–1512.
Zhu H. et al. Unmanipulated haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with severe aplastic anaemia // Br. J. Haematol. 2016. Vol. 174, № 5. P. 799–805.
Anderlini P. et al. Cyclophosphamide conditioning in patients with severe aplastic anaemia given unrelated marrow transplantation: A phase 1-2 dose de-escalation study // Lancet Haematol. Elsevier Ltd, 2015. Vol. 2, № 9. P. e367–e37
Trakhtman P.E. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the treatment of congenital and acquired non-malignant diseases in children (dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Medical Sciences) – 2011.
Kahl C. et al. Cyclophosphamide and antithymocyte globulin as a conditioning regimen for allogeneic marrow transplantation in patients with aplastic anaemia: A long-term follow-up // Br. J. Haematol. 2005. Vol. 130, № 5. P. 747–751.
Erin Gatza et al. Prevention and treatment of acute grft-versus-host disease in children, adolescents and young adults. Biol Blood marrow Transplant 2020; May; 26(50: e101-e112.
Radygina S.A. et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of abatacept for the prevention of acute graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children with non-malignant diseases. Voprosy Gematologii/Onkologii i Immunopatologii v Pediatrii. 2019, № 2 (18), 22-29
Shelikhova L, Ilushina M, Shekhovtsova Z, et al. alphabeta T Cell-Depleted Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation without Antithymocyte Globulin in Children with Chemorefractory Acute Myelogenous Leukemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019;25(5):e179–e82
Benito AI, Furlong T, Martin PJ, Anasetti C, Appelbaum FR, Doney K, Nash RA, Papayannopoulou T, Storb R, Sullivan KM, Witherspoon R, Deeg HJ. Sirolimus (rapamycin) for the treatment of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation. 2001 Dec 27;72(12):1924-9.
Pulsipher MA, Langholz B, Wall DA, et al. The addition of sirolimus to tacrolimus/methotrexate GVHD prophylaxis in children with ALL: a phase 3 Children’s Oncology Group/Pediatric Blood and Marrow Transplant Consortium trial. Blood. 2014;123(13):2017–25
Wei X, Xie Y, Jiang R, Li H, Wu H, Zhang Y, Li L, Zhou S, Ma X, Tang Z, He J, Wu D, Wu X. The impact of Rituximab administered before transplantation in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A real-world study. Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 31;13:967026.
Boelens JJ. et al. GVHD Prophilaxis // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Sureda A. et al. Springer, 2024. P. 219–228
Beloborodov V.B., Goloshchapov O.V., Gusarov V.G., Dekhnich A.V., Zamyatin M.N., Zubareva N.A., Zyryanov S.K., Kamyshova D.A., Klimko N.N., Kozlov R.S., Kulabukhov V.V., Petrushin M.A., Polushin Yu.S., Popov D.A., Rudnov V.A., Sidorenko S.V., Sokolov D.V., Shlyk I.V., Eydelshteyn M.V., Yakovlev S.V. Guidelines of the Russian non-profit public organization "Association of Anesthesiologists-Reanimatologists", Interregional Public Organization "Alliance of Clinical Chemotherapists and Microbiologists", Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (MACMAH), public organization "Russian Sepsis Forum" "Diagnosis and antimicrobial therapy of infections caused by multidrug-resistant microorganisms" (2022 update). Messenger of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation. 2022;19(2):84-114. https://doi.org/10.21292/2078-5658-2022-19-2-84-114
Cattaneo C. et al. Bloodstream infections in haematological cancer patients colonized by multidrug-resistant bacteria // Annals of Hematology, 2018 Vol.97, p. 1717-1726.
Miranda M., Nadel S. Pediatric Sepsis: a Summary of Current Definitions and Management Recommendations // Curr Pediatr Rep. Springer Nature, 2023. Vol. 11, № 2. P. 29–39.
Licciardello M. et al “Prophylaxis and therapy of viril infections in pediatric patients treated for malignancy” Pediatr Rep 2011; 3(1):13-16
Brennan M.T. et al “Oral manifestations in patients with aplastic anemia”. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Endod 2001; 92(5):503-8
Righini-Grunder F et al/ Frequency of oral mucositis and local virus reactivation in herpes simplex virus seropositive children with myelosupressive therapy// Klin Padiatr. 2015; 227(6-7): 335-8
Arghya S. et al “Clinical profile and microbiologic spectrum of febrile neutropenic episodes in children with severe aplastic anemia” J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2024; 42(3):193-197
Liu L-P et al High risk of bloodstream infection of carbapenem-resisstant Enterobacteriaceae carriers in neutropenic children with hematological diseases.//Antimicrob Resist Infect Control.2023; 12(1):66
Castagnola E. Et al/ Antibiotic Resistant Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Patients Receveiving Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: Factors Associated with Development of Resistance, Intensive Care Admission and Mortality// Antibiotics 2021; 10(3): 266
Kontou A. et al. Use of newer and repurposed antibiotics against gram-negative bacteria in neonates.// Antibiotics 2023; 12(6):1072
Chiotos K. et al Treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections in children
Hassan H et al Dosage regimen for meropenem in children with Pseudomonas infections do not meet serum concentration targets.//Clin Transl Sci 2020; 13(2):301-308
Chu-Han G. et al Personalized therapeutics for levofloxacin: a focus on pharmacokinetic concerns.// Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2014; 27(10):217-227
Gonzalez D et al Use of opportunistic clinical data and a population pharmacokinetics model to support dosing of clindamycin for premature infants to adolescents.//Clin Pharmacol Ther 2014; 96(4): 429-437
Aslan K. et al Clinical and laboratory responses to tigecycline in children.// J Clin Pharm Ther 2022; 47(10):1585-1590
Venuti F. et al. Novel beta Lactam Antibiotics for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in Children: A Narrative Review. Microorganisms 2023;11(7):1798
Soler-Palacin P. et al Voriconazole drug monitoring in the management of invasive fungal infection in immunocompromised children: a prospective trile. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67(3):700-706
5.Hsu AJ. Et al Challenges in the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised children.//Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2022; 66(7): e02156-21
Decembrino N et al A case series and literature review of isavuconazole use in pediatric patients with hemato-oncologic diseases and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.// Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64(3): e01783-19
Fernandez Ladesma B et al Isavuconazole use and TDM in real-word pediatric practice.// Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2023; 67(12): e00829-23
Prout A.J. et al @Bacterial and fungal etiology of sepsis in children in United States: recjnsidering empiric therapy”.Critical Care Medicine 2020;48(3):192-199
Tan X. et al “Comparative efficacy and safety of antipseudomonal b-lactams for pediatric febrile neutropenia”. Medicine (Baltimore)2021;100(50):27266
Sepsis in children with cancer : study and methodology guide / N. V. Matinyan, N. Yu. Epifanova, T. V. Gorbunova [et al.]. — Moscow : GEOTAR-Media, 2023. — 48 p. — DOI: 10.33029/9704-7973-5-SCC-2023-1-48.
Cornely O.A. et al Global guidline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Mucormycosis:an initiative of the Europian Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the Mycosis Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Lancet Infect Dis 2019;19(12):405-421
Di Pasquale M.F. et al “Prevalence and Etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompromised patients” Clin Infect Dis 2019 24;68(9):1482-1493
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Maschan A.A., MD, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the Institute of Hematology, Immunology and Cell Technologies at the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Russian Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology.
Novichkova G.A., MD, Professor, Scientific Director of the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Russian Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology
Kulagin A.D., MD, Professor, Director of the RM Gorbacheva Research Institute of Pediatric Hematology, Transplantology and Immunology at the First Saint Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, National Hematological Society.
Mikhailova E.A., MD, Professor, Leading Researcher at the Department of Chemotherapy of Hemoblastoses and Hematopoietic Depressions at the National Medical Research Center for Hematology of the Russian Ministry of Health, National Hematological Society.
Goronkova O.V., Senior Researcher at the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Russian Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology.
Maschan M.A., MD, Deputy General Director for Science at the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor at the Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Therapy at the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Russian Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology.
Balashov D.N., MD, Head of the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Department No. 2 at the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Bronin G.O., PhD, Head of the Bone Marrow and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Department at the Morozov Children's City Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Vakhonina L.V., pediatric oncologist, Sverdlovsk Regional Children's Clinical Hospital.
Dinikina Yu.V., PhD, Head of the Department of Chemotherapy for Oncohematological Diseases and Bone Marrow Transplantation for Children at the Almazov National Medical Research Centre of the Russian Ministry of Health
Zubarovskaya L.S., MD, Professor, Deputy Director for Transplantation, Head of the Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Transplantology at the RM Gorbacheva Research Institute of Pediatric Hematology, Transplantology and Immunology at the First Saint Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Kirgizov K.I., PhD, Deputy Director for Research, Head of the Department of Pediatric Bone Marrow and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation at the L.A. Durnov Research Institute of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology at the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Executive Director of the Russian Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology.
Paina O.V., PhD, Head of the Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplantation Department No. 1 at the RM Gorbacheva Research Institute of Pediatric Hematology, Transplantology and Immunology at the First Saint Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Skorobogatova E.V., MD, Head of the Bone Marrow Transplantation Department at the Russian Children's Clinical Hospital, a separate structural unit of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health
Fechina L.G., PhD, Deputy Chief Medical Officer for Oncology and Hematology at the Sverdlovsk Regional Children's Clinical Hospital, Chief freelance specialist pediatric oncologist of the Sverdlovsk Region.
Shelikhova L.N., PhD, Head of the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Department No. 1 at the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Rumyantsev A.G., MD, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Scientific Director of the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, Professor at the Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Therapy of the Pediatric Faculty at the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Trakhtman P.E., MD, Head of the Department of Transfusiology, Harvesting and Processing of Hematopoietic Stem Cells at the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology of the Russian Ministry of Health
Solopova G.G., PhD in Medicine, Deputy Chief Physician for Infection Control, Head of the Infection Control Department, National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology named after Dmitry Rogachev of the Russian Ministry of Health
Conflict of interest: none declared
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
1. Pediatric oncologists-hematologists
2. Hematologists
3. Pediatricians
Table 1. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Scale for grading levels of evidence certainty (LEC) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definition |
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Scale for grading grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.
The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Appendix A3.1. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acquired aplastic anemia aged 0 to 18 years.
1. General provisions
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a medical technology used to treat malignant blood diseases that are incurable by other (conservative) methods. The principle of the method consists of a combined effect on the hematopoietic and lymphoid systems affected by the disease, which comprises 1) the immuno- and myelosuppressive effect of high-dose chemotherapy and radiation therapy; 2) replacement of the bone marrow hematopoietic function with donor hematopoietic stem cells; and 3) immunological (alloimmune) effect of donor immunocompetent cells on the recipient's residual lymphohematopoiesis.
Allogeneic HSCT is the standard first-line therapy for high-risk acquired aplastic anemia (AAA), as well as for relapsed and refractory forms of AAA.
2. HSCT stages and clinical periodization
The HSCT procedure consists of the following stages (periods):
Pre-transplant evaluation of the donor and recipient
Pre-transplant conditioning of the donor and recipient
Recipient conditioning
Graft harvesting and processing
Myeloinfusion (transplantation proper)
Immunosuppressive and supportive therapy until myeloid reconstitution (graft engraftment)
Immunosuppressive and supportive therapy in the early post-engraftment phase (days 30–100)
Immunosuppressive and supportive therapy in the late post-engraftment phase (days 100–365)
3. Selection of donor and HSC source [50]
To ensure timely donor selection, all patients with AAA, upon establishing indications for HSCT, undergo tissue (HLA) typing of the patient and potential related donors. The strategy for family member typing is determined by the clinic's policy regarding the use of HSC donors.
A donor for a patient with AAA can be:
a. Fully matched related donor
b. Related partially compatible (haploidentical) donor
c. Unrelated compatible donor or unrelated partially compatible donor with an acceptable degree of mismatch
d. Unrelated umbilical cord blood
The source of HSCs is chosen based on the HSCT technological platform implemented at the clinic. The source of HSCs may be:
Bone marrow (BM)
Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC)
Cord blood (CB)
4. Patient evaluation prior to HSCT [51]
Pre-HSCT patient evaluation aims to establish the status of the underlying disease, assess comorbidity, functional status, nutritional status, infectious status, and psychological status.
Clinical laboratory diagnostic methods used in the evaluation of the patient prior to HSCT:
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential
General clinical blood chemistry test including the following parameters: albumin, total protein, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, creatinine, urea, glucose, electrolytes (K, Na, Mg, Ca), alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, alpha-amylase, pancreatic amylase, total cholesterol, triglycerides, lipase, low-density lipoproteins, high-density lipoproteins
Assay of blood ferritin level, serum folic acid level, and vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) level in blood
Blood gas and acid-base balance analysis
Peripheral blood immunophenotyping to identify lymphocyte subpopulation composition (main subsets)
Blood immunoglobulin level assay
Qualitative PCR detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in peripheral and cord blood
Qualitative PCR detection of Cytomegalovirus DNA in peripheral and cord blood
Qualitative PCR detection of human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6) DNA in peripheral and cord blood
PCR detection of human adenovirus DNA in nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs
Microbiological (culture) blood test for sterility
Determination of ABO blood groups and Rh factor (D antigen)
Indirect antiglobulin test (Coombs test), determination of antibodies to erythrocyte antigens in blood serum, determination of antibodies to blood group antigens, determination of cold anti-erythrocyte antibodies in blood
Direct antiglobulin test (direct Coombs test)
Determination of prothrombin time in blood or plasma, and international normalized ratio (INR)
Determination of activated partial thromboplastin time
Determination of thrombin time in blood
Detection of antibodies to Aspergillus spp. in blood
Hospital screening: detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in blood, detection of antibodies to hepatitis B virus core antigen in blood, molecular biological testing of blood for hepatitis C virus, molecular biological testing of blood for Treponema pallidum, detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 in blood, detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 in blood
Quantitative PCR detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in blood
Quantitative PCR detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in blood
Rapid immunochromatographic stool test for Clostridium difficile toxins A and B
A26.07.004 Microbiological (culture) examination of oral mucosa discharge for non-spore-forming anaerobic microorganisms;
A26.01.010 Microbiological (culture) examination of skin scraping for fungi (yeast, molds, dermatophytes).
General clinical cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis: physical properties of CSF, microscopic examination of CSF, cell counting in a counting chamber (determination of pleocytosis), cytological examination of CSF cells
Urinalysis, microscopic examination of urinary sediment
Protein determination in urine
Urine glucose assay
Urine creatinine assay
Urine urea assay
Microbiological (culture) testing for sterility of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and fragments of medical devices (central venous catheters, implants)
A26.09.011 Microbiological (culture) examination of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms.
A26.10.004 Microbiological (culture) examination of biopsy specimen for mycelial fungi.A26.09.030 Microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeast and mycelial).
A26.02.001 Microbiological (culture) examination of wound discharge for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms.
A26.19.001 Microbiological (culture) examination of feces/rectal swab for dysentery agent (Shigella spp.);
A26.19.003 Microbiological (culture) examination of feces/rectal swab for microorganisms of the genus Salmonella (Salmonella spp.);
A26.19.004 Microbiological (culture) examination of feces/rectal swab for Yersinia (Yersinia spp.);
A26.19.004.001 Microbiological (culture) examination of feces/rectal swab for the causative agent of yersiniosis (Yersinia enterocolitica);
A26.19.007 Microbiological (culture) examination of feces/rectal swab for the causative agent of Clostridioides difficile infection (Clostridium difficile);
A26.19.078 Microbiological (culture) examination of feces/rectal swab for diarrheagenic Escherichia (EHEC, EPEC, ETEC, EAgEC, EIEC). Examination of calcium level in urine
Urine phosphorus assay
A09.28.067 Examination of chloride level in urine.
Pancreatic amylase activity assay in blood
Blood troponin I and T assay
Assessment of nephron function via creatinine clearance (Rehberg's test)
Cell line sorting by flow cytometry (flow cytometric analysis of biological material)
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (after hypotonic cell treatment, on prepared cell suspension, imprints, and smears) (1 DNA probe)* (molecular cytogenetic study (FISH method) for one chromosome pair)
Differential leukocyte count (leukogram)
Free triiodothyronine (fT3) blood test
Free thyroxine (FT4) blood test
Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) blood test
Total cortisol blood test
Insulin-like growth factor I blood test
Blood serum follicle-stimulating hormone assay, blood serum luteinizing hormone assay
Blood total estradiol assay, blood total testosterone assay
Determination of class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Cytomegalovirus in blood
Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen (VCA) in blood
Determination of class M antibodies (IgM) to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen (VCA) in blood
Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to Varicella-Zoster virus in blood
Determination of class M antibodies (IgM) to Varicella-Zoster virus in blood
Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in blood
Determination of class M antibodies (IgM) to Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in blood
Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to Toxoplasma gondii in blood
Determination of class M antibodies (IgG) to Toxoplasma gondii in blood
Instrumental methods used in patient evaluation prior to HSCT:
Targeted chest X-ray (2 projections)
Computed tomography of the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement
Spiral computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses
Computed tomography of the chest
Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast under general anesthesia — 3T (Tesla)
Ultrasound examination of the kidneys, adrenal glands, urinary bladder, abdominal organs (liver, gallbladder, pancreas, spleen), retroperitoneal space, pelvic organs
Electrocardiography recording; interpretation, description, and analysis of electrocardiographic data (children aged 1–18 years)
24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (Ergospirometry)
Duplex scanning of brachiocephalic arteries with color Doppler blood flow mapping
Duplex scanning of the inferior vena cava and portal system veins
Acquisition of bone marrow cytologic specimen via puncture, bone marrow smear cytologic examination (myelogram)
Lumbar puncture
Anesthetic management (including early postoperative care)
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Colonoscopy
Endoscopic biopsy of the esophagus, stomach, duodenum
Endoscopic colon biopsy
Rectal biopsy using video-endoscopic technologies
Skin biopsy
Diagnostic bronchoscopy
Electroencephalography with video monitoring
Orthopantomography
Specialist physician consultations in the pre-transplant period:
Ophthalmologist
Otorhinolaryngologist
Neurologist
Dentist
Medical psychologist
Cardiologist
Pulmonologist
Endocrinologist
Obstetrician-gynecologist
5. Donor evaluation prior to HSCT [52]
Donor evaluation prior to HSCT is performed in two stages. Stage 1: evaluation of the potential donor. Aimed at determining the degree of HLA antigen compatibility and identifying absolute contraindications to donation. Stage 2: evaluation of the actual donor. Aimed at an objective assessment of the donor's health status and infection status, identifying relative contraindications to donation, and determining the priority method for HSC collection.
Clinical laboratory diagnostic methods used in the evaluation of the donor prior to HSCT:
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential
General clinical chemistry blood test including the assessment of the following parameters: albumin, total protein, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, creatinine, urea, glucose, electrolytes (K, Na), alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase, alpha-amylase, pancreatic amylase, total cholesterol, triglycerides, lipase, low-density lipoproteins, high-density lipoproteins
Determination of ABO blood groups and Rh factor (D antigen)
Determination of prothrombin time in blood or plasma, and international normalized ratio (INR)
Determination of activated partial thromboplastin time
Determination of thrombin time in blood
Detection of antibodies to Aspergillus spp. in blood
Hospital screening: determination of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in blood, determination of antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) in blood, molecular biological testing of blood for antibodies to hepatitis C virus in blood, molecular biological testing of blood for antibodies to Treponema pallidum in blood, determination of immunoglobulin M and G (IgM, IgG) antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 in blood, determination of immunoglobulin M and G (IgM, IgG) antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 in blood
Quantitative PCR detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in blood
Quantitative PCR detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in blood
General clinical urinalysis, microscopic examination of urine sediment
Determination of class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Cytomegalovirus in blood
Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen (VCA) in blood
Determination of class M antibodies (IgM) to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen (VCA) in blood
Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to Varicella-Zoster virus in blood
Determination of class M antibodies (IgM) to Varicella-Zoster virus in blood
Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in blood
Determination of class M antibodies (IgM) to Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 in blood
Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to Toxoplasma gondii in blood
Determination of class M antibodies (IgG) to Toxoplasma gondii in blood
Instrumental methods used in the evaluation of the donor prior to HSCT:
Targeted chest X-ray (2 projections)
Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast enhancement under anesthesia – 3T (Tesla)
Ultrasound examination of the kidneys, adrenal glands, urinary bladder, abdominal cavity organs (liver, gallbladder, pancreas, spleen), retroperitoneal space, pelvic organs
Electrocardiography; recording, analysis, description, and interpretation of electrocardiographic data
24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Duplex scanning of brachiocephalic arteries with color Doppler blood flow mapping
Duplex scanning of the inferior vena cava and portal system veins
Echocardiography
Anesthetic management (including early postoperative care)
6. Graft procurement [53]
HSC graft collection and processing include procedures for retrieving donor HSCs and their subsequent processing aimed at establishing optimal functional characteristics of the graft. The stages of graft collection are:
Donor preparation
Graft collection
Graft processing
Graft quality control
Graft transportation and storage (when the location and time of graft collection differ from those of graft infusion)
Donor preparation
Donor preparation depends on the graft collection method and, accordingly, on the chosen HSC source (BM or PBSC).
When bone marrow is used as the HSC source, donor preparation includes:
Preoperative evaluation
Vascular access establishment
When used as a HSC source, donor preparation includes:
Pharmacological mobilization of HSCs into the bloodstream. The goal of pharmacological mobilization of HSCs is the temporary relocation of bone marrow HSCs into the vascular bed to enable the collection of the required number of HSCs.
Vascular access establishment
Graft collection
Donor BM procurement [54]
Donor BM collection is performed in the operating room under general or epidural anesthesia. Technically, BM collection consists of successive punctures in the region of the posterior superior iliac spine and iliac crest, followed by BM aspiration. The target volume of donor BM is 20 ml/kg of the recipient's body weight and must not exceed 20 ml/kg of the donor's body weight. The aspirated BM is transferred into a heparinized container (bag).
Medicines and medical devices required for donor BM procurement:
Gelatin** – 4% solution
Rocuronium bromide**
Sevoflurane**
Fentanyl**
Ropivacaine**
Endotracheal tube
Peripheral venous catheter
Bone marrow aspiration needle
Medical syringe 10 ml, 5 ml, 2 ml capacity
Bone marrow collection set (or blood component collection set)
Infusion set
Sodium heparin**
Dextrose + sodium citrate
Suture material
Scalpel
Adhesive bandage
Sterile gloves
Antiseptics and disinfectants for skin preparation of the surgical field
Donor HSPC procurement [55]
Donor PBSC collection is performed in the blood transfusion department or by a transfusiologist of the HSCT department. Technically, donor PBSC collection is performed by automated leukapheresis using a blood cell separator. The leukapheresis volume is determined based on the blood HSC concentration resulting from pharmacological mobilization and ranges from 0.5 to 2 circulating blood volumes (CBV).
Medicines and medical devices required for donor HSPC procurement:
Colony-stimulating factors (ATC group L03AA)
#Plerixafor 0.24 mg/kg/day s.c.
Fistula needles 17G
Peripheral catheter 16G
Central venous catheter 7-12F
Spectra Optia Collection Set (ref 10110, Terumo BCT) or Spectra Optia IDL Set (ref 10310, Terumo BCT)
Dextrose + sodium citrate
Sodium heparin**
Packed red blood cells
Blood transfusion sets
Discofix (three-way stopcock)
Empty sterile blood component bag
Cord blood procurement [56]
Cord blood collection is performed in the delivery room. Technically, cord blood collection is carried out by puncturing the umbilical vein of the umbilical cord and collecting the cord blood into a collection system (four-chamber bag with anticoagulant).
HSC graft processing [57]
Graft processing is a set of technical manipulations aimed at modifying the qualitative and quantitative parameters of the HSC graft in order to ensure optimal functional characteristics of the graft in terms of the efficacy and safety of the HSCT procedure. Graft processing is performed in a specialized laboratory within the blood transfusion department or HSCT department. The main types of graft processing are [58]:
Graft splitting
Graft volume reduction
Plasma reduction (removal)
Erythrocyte reduction (removal)
HSC selection (CD34 selection)
Selective lymphocyte depletion (ab T depletion, CD19 depletion, CD45RA depletion)
Cryopreservation and thawing
The choice of processing method (or combination of methods) is determined by the baseline characteristics of the donor-recipient pair, the HSC source, and the technological platform implemented in the transplant center.
Graft quality control
An HSC graft is a suspension of donor nucleated cells enriched with HSCs. Prior to administering the HSC graft to the recipient, quality control of the graft is mandatory.
The mandatory HSC graft parameters subject to control and registration are:
Graft volume
Concentration and absolute count of nucleated cells
Concentration and absolute count of CD34+ cells (HSC-enriched fraction)
Additional HSC graft parameters subject to control and registration are
Concentration and absolute count of leukocyte subpopulations (depending on the chosen graft processing method)
CD34+ cell viability (HSC-enriched fraction)
Transportation and storage of the HSC graft
Transportation and storage of the HSC graft (or a portion thereof) are necessary when the procedures of procurement, processing, and administration of the graft are separated in time and space. Transportation of the HSC graft can be carried out in a native state and after cryopreservation. Native graft transportation is carried out at a temperature range of +3 to +8oC while maintaining the cold chain. The maximum transportation and storage period (including processing) without cryopreservation is 72 hours from the moment of HSC graft procurement. Cryopreserved graft transportation is carried out at a temperature range of -150 to -196oC while maintaining the cold chain.
7. Conditioning regimen [59]
The conditioning regimen is a program of immunosuppressive and chemotherapy +/- radiation therapy, the purpose of which is the eradication of the recipient's hematopoietic and immune system and the creation, thereby, of the conditions necessary for the engraftment and functioning of donor hematopoiesis and the formation of the donor immune system.
The conditioning regimen includes chemotherapeutic drugs with pronounced immunosuppressive and/or myelosuppressive effects. The set of drugs, doses, and sequence of administration of chemotherapeutic agents within the conditioning regimen may vary. The choice of the conditioning regimen is determined by the HSCT technological platform implemented in the transplant center and the baseline characteristics of the donor-recipient pair.
Medicines used in the conditioning regimen in AAA (total course dose) [59, 169]
#Treosulfan, 30-42 g/m2, intravenous [60]
#Busulfan**, 8 mg/kg, oral form [61,155,156]
#Fludarabine**, 100-180 mg/m2, intravenous [62,63]
Thiotepa, 5-10 mg/kg, intravenous [157]
#Melphalan** 140 mg/m2, intravenous [157]
#Cyclophosphamide**, 40-200 mg/kg, intravenous [63]
ATG: Equine anti-thymocyte globulin at a dose of 20 mg/kg/day for 5 days, course dose 100 mg/kg, intravenous [157]
Anti-thymocyte globulin** (Rabbit) 5 mg/kg, intravenous [157]
Total body irradiation 2-6 Gy [159]
8. Introduction to GVHD [64]
Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a key immunological complication of HSCT. GvHD is an immunopathological process based on the recognition by donor immunocompetent cells of antigenic differences between the donor and recipient, the generation of an immune response, and inflammatory damage to the recipient's organs and tissues. There are 4 categories of GvHD: 1) classic acute GvHD (aGvHD); 2) late acute GvHD; 3) 'overlap syndrome' of acute and chronic GvHD; 4) chronic GvHD (cGvHD). According to the NIH Consensus, the latter two categories form the broad category of chronic GvHD.
1) Classical aGVHD: a clinical syndrome developing within up to 100 days after HSCT or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). The underlying mechanism is acute inflammatory tissue damage and organ dysfunction. Classical target organs: skin, gastrointestinal tract (GIT), liver. Skin involvement manifests as maculopapular rash, epidermolysis. GIT involvement manifests as diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, hemocolitis, ileus. Liver involvement manifests as hepatitis with a predominance of cholestasis.
2) Late aGvHD: typical clinical manifestations of aGvHD developing after day 100 post-HSCT or donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI). Frequently observed upon discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy.
3) 'Overlap syndrome' of aGvHD and cGvHD: a combination of typical clinical manifestations of both aGvHD and cGvHD, regardless of the time of onset.
4) cGvHD: chronic immune-mediated damage to organs and tissues based on impaired development of immunological tolerance. Histopathologically characterized by progression to fibrosis.
The main risk factors for the development of GvHD include: HLA-mismatch between donor and recipient (in the classic approach to GvHD prophylaxis), female donor for a male recipient, use of PBSCs as a graft source, donor alloimmunization (history of pregnancies, blood transfusions), prior treatment history of the patient, myeloablative conditioning, presence of cytomegalovirus infection.
9. GVHD prophylaxis
The goal of GVHD prophylaxis is to prevent the development of GVHD overall and, in particular, severe, life-threatening, and disabling forms of GVHD. GVHD prophylaxis can be based on the targeted depletion of GVHD effectors from the HSC graft ex vivo (see the section Graft processing) and on pharmacological intervention in the recipient. The list of drugs used in GVHD prophylaxis is presented below [65]. Drugs are grouped into GVHD prophylaxis regimens; the choice of regimen is determined by the GVHD risk in the donor-recipient pair and the HSCT technological platform implemented at the transplant center.
#Ciclosporin**, 3 mg/kg/day, intravenously [160-164]
#Methotrexate**, 10-15 mg/m2/day, intravenously [160-164]
#Tacrolimus**, 0.02-0.03 mg/kg/day, orally or intravenously [160,163,164,165]
#Mycophenolate mofetil**, 30 mg/kg/day, orally [163,164,166-168]
#Cyclophosphamide**, 50 mg/kg/day, intravenously [67,163,164,166,169,170]
Antithymocyte globulin**, rabbit 1.5-2.5 mg/kg/day, intravenously, total dose 2.5-10 mg/kg [68,163,164,169,171]
#Bortezomib**, 1.3 mg/m2/day, intravenously [69,163,164,172]
#Abatacept**, 10 mg/kg (not exceeding 800 mg), intravenously, [70,157,163,164,173]
#Tocilizumab**, 4-8 mg/kg, intravenously once a week [71,163,164,174]
#Sirolimus 4-12 mg/day, orally [72,163,164,175,176]
#Everolimus** 1.5 mg/m2 twice daily, orally [73,163,164]
#Rituximab**, 375 mg/m2/week, intravenously [74,163,164,174,177]
10. Graft engraftment (myeloreconstitution) [4]
The first stage in evaluating HSCT efficacy is achieving graft engraftment. Graft engraftment criteria include: achieving a leukocyte concentration of more than 1 thousand/µL, neutrophil count of more than 0.5 thousand/µL, and platelet count above 20 thousand/µL for 3 consecutive days. An additional criterion for engraftment is the presence of donor chimerism in the bone marrow. Primary graft failure can be diagnosed if engraftment criteria are not met within 30 days; however, when using certain transplantation technologies (e.g., post-transplantation cyclophosphamide or double-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation), engraftment may occur at a later date. Opportunistic viral infections may also delay graft engraftment.
11. Diagnosis and therapy of acute GVHD [75]
The diagnosis of aGVHD is based on the observation and recording of characteristic clinical manifestations and symptoms in the recipient after HSC graft infusion. To verify the clinical diagnosis of aGVHD, a biopsy of the involved organ and histological examination are required. The severity of aGVHD is assessed in accordance with the international grading system given in Tables 1 and 2 [75].
Table 1. Clinical staging of acute GVHD (severity of organ involvement) [68] | |||
Grade | Skin | Liver | Intestine |
+ (I) | Maculopapular rash <25% of body surface area | Bilirubin, 2-3 mg/dL (34-50 µmol/L) | Diarrhea, 500-1000 mL/day (300-580 mL/m2 per day). *Diarrhea >10-15 mL/kg/24 h or persistent nausea and '+' biopsy |
+ + (II) | Maculopapular rash 25-50% of body surface area | Bilirubin, 3-6 mg/dL (51-102 µmol/L) | Diarrhea, 1000-1500 mL/day (580-880 mL/m2 per day). *Diarrhea >16-20 mL/kg/24 h |
+ + + (III) | Generalized erythroderma | Bilirubin, 6-15 mg/dL (102-255 µmol/L) | Diarrhea, >1500 mL/day (>880 mL/m2 per day)/ *Diarrhea >21-25 mL/kg/24 h |
+ + + + (IV) | Desquamation and bullae formation | Bilirubin, >15 mg/dL (>255 µmol/L) | Severe pain or ileus *Diarrhea >26 mL/kg/24 h * St Jude |
Table 2. Clinical staging of acute GVHD (overall stage/grade) [75] | ||||
Grade | Grade | Loss of function | ||
Skin | Liver | Intestine | ||
0 (absent) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
I (mild) | + up to + + | 0 | 0 | 0 |
II (moderate) | + up to + + + | + | + | + |
III (severe) | ++ up to + + + | + + up to + + + | + + up to + + + | + + |
IV (life-threatening) | ++ up to + + + + | + + up to + + + + | + + up to + + + + | + + + |
Upon establishing the clinical diagnosis of aGVHD, therapy is initiated, the composition of which is determined by the severity of aGVHD. The severity of aGVHD and the response to first-line therapy determine the prognosis of aGVHD progression and survival. If there is no response to first-line therapy, a decision is made to prescribe second- and subsequent-line therapy.
Clinical laboratory diagnostic methods used in the diagnosis and therapy of GVHD [75]:
Complete blood count (CBC) with differential
General clinical biochemical blood test including the following parameters: albumin, total protein, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, creatinine, urea, glucose, electrolytes (K, Na, Mg, Ca), alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, alkaline phosphatase, alpha-amylase, pancreatic amylase, total cholesterol, triglycerides, lipase, low-density lipoproteins, high-density lipoproteins
Blood gas and acid-base balance analysis
Peripheral blood immunophenotyping to identify lymphocyte subpopulation composition (main subsets)
Blood immunoglobulin level assay
Molecular genetic study of hematopoietic chimerism after unrelated bone marrow transplantation
Qualitative PCR detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in peripheral blood
Qualitative PCR detection of Cytomegalovirus DNA in peripheral blood
Qualitative PCR detection of human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6) DNA in peripheral blood
PCR detection of human adenovirus DNA in nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs
Microbiological (culture) blood test for sterility
Determination of ABO blood groups and Rh factor (D antigen)
Indirect antiglobulin test (Coombs test), determination of antibodies to erythrocyte antigens in blood serum, determination of antibodies to blood group antigens, determination of cold anti-erythrocyte antibodies in blood
Direct antiglobulin test (direct Coombs test)
Individual erythrocyte mass compatibility (Cross-matching test using recipient immune antibodies and donor major histocompatibility complex antigens)
Determination of prothrombin time in blood or plasma, and international normalized ratio (INR)
Determination of activated partial thromboplastin time
Determination of thrombin time in blood
Detection of antibodies to Aspergillus spp. in blood
Hospital screening: detection of Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in blood, detection of antibodies to Hepatitis B virus core antigen in blood, detection of antibodies to Hepatitis C virus in blood, detection of antibodies to Treponema pallidum in blood, detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 in blood, detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 in blood
Quantitative PCR detection of hepatitis B virus DNA in blood
Quantitative PCR detection of hepatitis C virus RNA in blood
Rapid immunochromatographic stool test for Clostridium difficile toxins A and B
A26.07.004 Microbiological (culture) examination of oral mucosa discharge for non-spore-forming anaerobic microorganisms;
A26.01.010 Microbiological (culture) examination of skin scraping for fungi (yeast, molds, dermatophytes).
General clinical cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis: physical properties of CSF, microscopic examination of CSF, cell counting in a counting chamber (determination of pleocytosis), cytological examination of CSF cells
Urinalysis, microscopic examination of urinary sediment
Protein determination in urine
Urine glucose assay
Urine creatinine assay
Urine urea assay
Microbiological (culture) testing for sterility of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and fragments of medical devices (central venous catheters, implants)
A26.09.011 Microbiological (culture) examination of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms.
A26.10.004 Microbiological (culture) examination of biopsy specimen for mold fungi A26.09.030 Microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeast and mold). A26.02.001 Microbiological (culture) examination of wound discharge for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms.
A26.19.001 Microbiological (culture) examination of feces/rectal swab for dysentery agent (Shigella spp.);
Urine calcium assay
Urine phosphorus assay
A09.28.067 Examination of chloride level in urine.
Pancreatic amylase activity assay in blood
Blood troponin I and T assay
Assessment of nephron function via creatinine clearance (Rehberg's test)
Cell line sorting by flow cytometry (flow cytometric analysis of biological material)
Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (after hypotonic cell treatment, on prepared cell suspension, imprints, and smears) (1 DNA probe)* (molecular cytogenetic study (FISH method) for one chromosome pair)
Instrumental methods and procedures used in the diagnosis and therapy of GVHD [75]:
Targeted chest X-ray (2 projections)
Computed tomography of the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement
Spiral computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses
Computed tomography of the chest
Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast enhancement under anesthesia – 3T (Tesla)
Ultrasound examination of the kidneys, adrenal glands, urinary bladder, abdominal organs (liver, gallbladder, pancreas, spleen), retroperitoneal space, pelvic organs
Electrocardiography recording; interpretation, description, and analysis of electrocardiographic data (children aged 1–18 years)
24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (Ergospirometry)
Diffusing capacity of the lungs test (children >10 years)
Duplex scanning of brachiocephalic arteries with color Doppler blood flow mapping
Serial echocardiography (provided to inpatients)
Duplex scanning of the inferior vena cava and portal system veins
Acquisition of bone marrow cytologic specimen via puncture, bone marrow smear cytologic examination (myelogram)
Lumbar puncture
Anesthetic management (including early postoperative care)
Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Colonoscopy
Endoscopic biopsy of the esophagus, stomach, duodenum
Endoscopic colon biopsy
Rectal biopsy using video-endoscopic technologies
Skin biopsy
Diagnostic bronchoscopy
Electroencephalography with video monitoring
Medications used in the therapy of GVHD (daily dose) [75–77,87,164]:
#Methylprednisolone**, 2 mg/kg/day, intravenously [178]
Antithymocyte globulin** rabbit-rabbit 1.5-2.5 mg/kg/day intravenously, total dose 2.5-10 mg/kg [68]
Ciclosporin**, 1-3 mg/kg/day, orally
#Methotrexate**, 5-15 mg/m2/day, intravenously [78]
#Tacrolimus**, 0.03 mg/kg/day, orally [66]
#Mycophenolate mofetil**, 190-1600 mg/m2/day, orally [79,178]
#Alemtuzumab**, 0.3-2 mg/kg intravenously (total dose administered over 2-6 days) [80,178]
Ibrutinib**, 140-420 mg/day, orally [178]
#Ruxolitinib**, 2.5-10 mg/m2 twice daily, orally [81,178]
#Etanercept**, 0.4 mg/kg, subcutaneously twice a week [82,115,178]
#Bortezomib**, 1.3 mg/m2/day, intravenously [69,178]
#Abatacept**, 10 mg/kg (not exceeding 800 mg), intravenously every 2 weeks for the first 3 doses, then every 4 weeks [70,115,178]
#Tocilizumab**, 4-8 mg/kg, intravenously once a week [71,115,178]
#Sirolimus 2-4 mg/day, orally [72,115,178]
#Everolimus** 1.5 mg/m2 twice daily, orally [73,178]
#Infliximab**, 10 mg/kg, intravenously once a week [83,178]
#Rituximab**, 375 mg/m2/week, intravenously [74,178]
Topical glucocorticoids (ATC code D07A "Corticosteroids")
Topical calcineurin inhibitors (from the group "Other dermatological preparations", ATC code D11AH) – #tacrolimus, #pimecrolimus** in topical form [84,85]
Mesenchymal stromal cells
#Imatinib**, 65-260 mg/m2/day, orally [86]
12. Diagnosis and therapy of chronic GVHD [87]
A diagnosis of cGVHD is established when at least one diagnostic manifestation or one distinctive manifestation is identified, confirmed by biopsy, laboratory tests, or imaging studies (Table 3).
Table 3 - Characteristic features and diagnostic criteria of chronic GVHD [88] | ||||
Organ or site | Diagnostic (sufficient to establish a diagnosis of cGVHD) | Distinctive (observed in cGVHD, but insufficient to establish a diagnosis) | Other manifestations | General (for both acute and chronic GVHD) |
Skin | - poikiloderma - lichenoid features - sclerotic changes - circumscribed scleroderma - sclerotic lichenoid lesions | - depigmentation - papulosquamous lesions | - impaired sweating - ichthyosis - keratosis - hypopigmentation - hyperpigmentation | - erythema - maculopapular rash - pruritus |
Nails | - dystrophy - vertical striation - nail plate lysis - nail pterygium (eponychium hypertrophy) - symmetrical loss of nail plates | |||
Hair | - recurrence of alopecia with/without scarring (after hair regrowth following chemotherapy) - loss of body hair - scaling, papulosquamous areas | - hair thinning, usually focal, coarse and dull hair (not associated with endocrine or other disorders) - premature greying of hair | ||
Oral cavity | - lichenoid manifestations | - xerostomia - mucocele - mucosal atrophy - pseudomembranes - ulcerative lesions | - gingivitis - mucositis - erythema - pain | |
Eyes | - dryness, itching, eye pain - cicatricial conjunctivitis - keratoconjunctivitis sicca - punctate keratopathy | - photophobia - periorbital hyperpigmentation - blepharitis (erythema and eyelid edema) | ||
Genitalia | - lichenoid features - vaginal scarring and stenosis, phimosis or urethral stenosis | - erosions - fissures - ulcers | ||
GI tract | - esophageal webs - strictures or stenosis of the upper and middle thirds of the esophagus | - exocrine pancreatic insufficiency | - anorexia - nausea - vomiting - diarrhea - weight loss - impaired development in children | |
Liver | - total bilirubin, ALP1 > 2 times the upper limit of normal - ALT2 or AST3 2 times > normal | |||
Lungs | - biopsy-confirmed bronchiolitis obliterans - bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome | - bronchiolitis obliterans confirmed radiologically and by tests – air trapping or bronchiectasis | - bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia - restrictive lung disease | |
Muscles, fascia, joints | - fasciitis - joint stiffness or contractures due to sclerosis | - myositis or polymyositis (proximal muscle weakness; myalgia is uncommon) | - edema - muscle cramps - arthralgia or arthritis | |
Hematopoiesis and immune disorders | - thrombocytopenia - eosinophilia - lymphopenia - hypo- or hypergammaglobulinemia - autoantibodies (AIHA4, ITP5) - Raynaud's phenomenon | |||
Other | - pericardial or pleural effusion - ascites - peripheral neuropathy - nephrotic syndrome - myasthenia gravis - impaired myocardial contractility or cardiomyopathy | |||
The severity of cGVHD is determined based on the number of affected organs and the severity of organ function impairment (see Table 4) [89].
Mild cGVHD – involvement of 1–2 organs or sites (excluding the lungs), without clinically significant functional impairment (maximum score of 1 in all affected organs)
Moderate cGVHD – involvement of at least one organ or site with clinically significant, but not extensive dysfunction (maximum score of 2), or 3 or more organs without clinical functional impairment (maximum score of 1 in each organ), or lung involvement of no more than 1 point.
Severe cGVHD – significant dysfunction (score of 3 in any organ), or lung involvement (score of 2 or higher).
Table 4 - Scoring of chronic GVHD manifestations [89] | ||||
Organ | Score 0 | Score 1 | Score 2 | Score 3 |
Scales: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale (ECOG – see Appendix G1) | fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction (ECOG 0;) | restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (ECOG 1) | ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours (ECOG 2) | capable of only limited selfcare, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours (ECOG 3-4) |
Skin Clinical manifestations:
BSA – % of involved area | no symptoms | <18% of body surface area (BSA) with signs of disease but without sclerotic changes | 19–50% BSA or superficial sclerotic changes (not deep, skin pinchable) | >50% BSA or deep sclerotic changes or impaired mobility, ulcerations, or severe pruritus |
Oral cavity
| no symptoms | minor symptoms with signs of disease but without significant limitation of oral intake | moderate manifestations with signs of disease and partial restriction of oral intake | severe symptoms with signs of disease and marked restriction of oral intake |
Eyes
| no symptoms | mild dryness, without impairment of daily activities (DA) (drops <3 times a day) or asymptomatic dry keratoconjunctivitis | moderate dryness with partial impairment of DA (drops >3 times a day), without visual impairment | severe dryness with significant impairment of DA (special analgesic gels) or inability to work due to eye involvement, or vision loss due to dry keratoconjunctivitis |
GI tract
| no symptoms | dysphagia, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, or diarrhea without significant weight loss (<5%) | symptoms associated with mild to moderate weight loss (5–15%) | symptoms associated with significant weight loss >15%, requiring nutritional support to meet basic energy requirements or esophageal dilation |
Liver | total bilirubin within normal limits, ALT or ALP <3 times the upper limit of normal | total bilirubin within normal limits, ALT ≥ 3-5 x ULN, or ALP* ≥ 3 x ULN | elevated total bilirubin, but ≤3 mg/dL, or ALT > 5 x ULN | total bilirubin >3 mg/dL |
Lungs | no symptoms FEV1 >80% | minor symptoms (dyspnea when climbing stairs) FEV1 60-79% | moderate symptoms (dyspnea when walking on flat ground) FEV1 40-59% | severe symptoms (dyspnea at rest; requiring O2) FEV1 <39% |
Joints and fascia To assess the range of motion (ROM), the photographic range of motion (P-ROM) scale for joints is used | no symptoms | mild stiffness of the arms or legs, normal or slightly reduced ROM, not affecting ADL | stiffness of the arms or legs or joint contractures, erythema due to fasciitis, moderate decrease in ROM, and minimal to moderate limitation in ADL | contractures with significant decrease in range of motion and marked limitation of DA (inability to put on shoes, tie shoelaces, button a shirt, dress independently, etc.) |
Genitalia Active sex life | no symptoms | minor examination findings, without impact on coitus and with minimal discomfort during gynecological examination | moderate examination findings, with slight dyspareunia or discomfort during gynecological examination | severe symptoms (strictures, labial agglutination with ulceration) and severe pain during coitus or inability to achieve vaginal penetration |
Notes. –
* ALP may be elevated in growing children without reflecting hepatic dysfunction
Abbreviations: KI – Karnofsky Index, LI – Lansky Index, BSA – body surface area, DA – daily activities, GI – gastrointestinal tract, ALP – alkaline phosphatase, ALT – alanine aminotransferase, AST – aspartate aminotransferase, LFS – lung function score, FEV1 – forced expiratory volume in 1 second, DLCO – diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, ROM – range of motion, P-ROM – photographic range of motion
To ensure timely diagnosis and early initiation of therapy, prevent life-threatening conditions and disability, a systematic and thorough assessment of patients' organs and systems is required. This also helps assess response to therapy and determine further treatment strategy. The frequency of systematic assessment of organ involvement and severity of cGVHD is once every 4 weeks.
cGVHD therapy is based on pharmacological immunosuppression. The goal of therapy is to restore the function of affected organs, prevent or minimize disability, and restore quality of life. The baseline drug is prednisolone at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day (or methylprednisolone at an equipotent dose). The approach to additional drug therapy and second-line therapy is determined by the severity of the process, the set of involved organs, and the baseline immunosuppressive therapy at the time of cGVHD manifestation.
13. Prevention and Management of Infectious Complications [90]
Secondary immunodeficiency in HSCT recipients develops as a result of the underlying disease, baseline therapy, conditioning regimen, GVHD prophylaxis and treatment regimen, and GVHD itself. The immunodeficiency is combined in nature and includes impairments of all major components of immune defense: 1) disruption of the barrier function of the skin and mucous membranes; 2) disruption of the normal microbiota with loss of colonization resistance; 3) granulocytopenia; 4) monocytopenia; 5) humoral immunodeficiency; 6) cellular immunodeficiency. The nature of immunodeficiency and its severity vary at different stages of HSCT. In the first 30 days (prior to engraftment and in the early post-engraftment period), granulocytopenia and impaired barrier function of the skin and mucous membranes dominate. Between days 30 and 100, cellular immunodeficiency dominates. After 100 days, humoral immunodeficiency persists, while the severity of cellular immunodeficiency varies depending on the volume of immunosuppressive therapy. The nature of immunodeficiency determines the predisposition to developing a specific type of infection and dictates the set of measures for the prophylaxis and treatment of infectious complications in accordance with the post-HSCT period.
a. Bacterial Infections [91]
The main risk factors for bacterial infections in HSCT recipients in the early period include granulocytopenia, use of central venous catheters, mucositis, dermatitis, preexisting colonization with multidrug-resistant pathogens, and refractory underlying disease. Early bacterial infections are caused by Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacilli. In the late period, the main risk factors are humoral immune deficiency and hyposplenism, predisposing to infections with encapsulated microorganisms (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis). The main types of bacterial infections after HSCT are pneumonia, sinusitis, enterocolitis, proctitis, soft tissue infections, and bacteremia/sepsis.
Prophylaxis of bacterial infections includes sanitary and epidemiological measures: access control, hand hygiene of staff and caring family members, microbiological safety of food and water. Pharmacological prophylaxis of bacterial infections is possible in accordance with the hospital's infection control policy.
Diagnosis of bacterial infections includes clinical, instrumental, and laboratory diagnostics.
Treatment of bacterial infections in HSCT recipients is carried out on the principle of empirical therapy followed by adjustment according to the results of microbiological testing and phased escalation or de-escalation depending on the dynamics of the infectious process.
b. Viral Infections [92]
The main risk factors for viral infections in HSCT recipients are lymphopenia, cellular immunodeficiency, ongoing GVHD, systemic corticosteroid therapy, lymphodepleting monoclonal antibody therapy, use of mismatched and partially compatible donors, presence of persistent viral infection in the patient and/or donor prior to HSCT, ex vivo T-cell depletion, and refractory underlying disease. The major viral pathogens in HSCT recipients are cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus type 6, herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, parvovirus B19, adenovirus, and respiratory syncytial virus. Viral infections in HSCT recipients may present typically, but a severe course and generalized infection are characteristic.
Prophylaxis of viral infections includes sanitary and epidemiological measures: access control, hand hygiene of staff and caring family members, microbiological safety of food and water, microbiological safety of blood components. A specific preventive measure is the selection of a donor matched to the patient regarding exposure to key viral pathogens, and the choice of an HSCT technology that minimizes the volume and duration of post-HSCT pharmacological immunosuppression. Pharmacological prophylaxis of viral infections is carried out against herpes family viruses in accordance with the individual risk of infection using the corresponding group representative.
Diagnosis of viral infections includes clinical, instrumental, and laboratory diagnostics.
Treatment of viral infections in HSCT recipients is carried out on the principle of preemptive therapy and empirical therapy followed by adjustment according to the results of microbiological testing and phased escalation or de-escalation depending on the dynamics of the infectious process. Preemptive therapy is the standard for controlling CMV infection and includes weekly quantitative monitoring of viral load in the patient's blood and the administration of antiviral therapy when threshold values are exceeded. Similar tactics are applied for EBV, adenovirus, and HHV-6 in the high-risk group.
c. Fungal Infections [93,94]
The main risk factors for viral infections in HSCT recipients are granulocytopenia, lymphopenia, cellular immunodeficiency, ongoing GvHD, systemic corticosteroid therapy, lymphodepleting monoclonal antibody therapy, use of unrelated and partially matched donors, colonization of mucous membranes with yeasts, invasive fungal infection in the patient prior to HSCT, ex vivo T-cell depletion, and refractory underlying disease. The main fungal pathogens in HSCT recipients are fungi of the genus Candida, Aspergillus, and Zygomycetes. Fungal infections in HSCT recipients may present as superficial mycosis, but a severe course, invasive growth, and generalization of the infection are characteristic.
Prophylaxis of fungal infections includes sanitary and epidemiological measures: air quality control, access control, hand hygiene for staff and caregivers, microbiological safety of food and water. A specific preventive measure is the choice of HSCT technology that minimizes the volume and duration of pharmacological immunosuppression after HSCT. Pharmacological prophylaxis of fungal infections is carried out in accordance with the individual risk of infection in the specific post-HSCT period.
Diagnosis of fungal infections includes clinical, instrumental, and laboratory diagnostics. Depending on the local epidemiology of fungal infections, monitoring of fungal biomarkers and a preemptive treatment strategy may be used.
Therapy for fungal infections in HSCT recipients is carried out on the principle of preemptive therapy and empirical therapy, followed by correction based on the results of microbiological studies and staged escalation or de-escalation depending on the dynamics of the infectious process.
14. Prevention of Specific (Organ-Specific) Complications
a. Hemorrhagic Cystitis [95]
Hemorrhagic cystitis is a specific HSCT complication developing due to damage to the bladder mucosa by drugs used in the conditioning regimen and/or an infectious process. The highest risk of developing early hemorrhagic cystitis is characteristic of conditioning regimens that include high doses of cyclophosphamide**, busulfan**, and total body irradiation. Late hemorrhagic cystitis is associated with BK polyomavirus infection, certain adenovirus serotypes, and, less commonly, cytomegalovirus. GvHD plays a certain role in the development of hemorrhagic cystitis. Clinically, hemorrhagic cystitis manifests as dysuria, hematuria (ranging from microhematuria to massive hemorrhage with urethral obstruction by clots). Prophylaxis of hemorrhagic cystitis includes selecting a conditioning regimen that minimizes exposure to high doses of cyclophosphamide**, hyperinfusion regimen during cyclophosphamide** therapy, and systemic administration of mesna**. Therapy for early hemorrhagic cystitis includes infusion, forced diuresis, systemic hemostatic therapy, and local hemostasis. Therapy for late hemorrhagic cystitis includes infusion, forced diuresis, systemic hemostatic therapy, local hemostasis, and antiviral therapy.
b. Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease (Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome) [96,97]
Hepatic veno-occlusive disease is a specific HSCT complication caused by damage to the endothelium of the portal system sinusoids, development of microthrombosis and occlusion of portal vessels, resulting in portal hypertension and liver failure. Risk factors for hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) include myeloablative conditioning regimens using drugs such as busulfan**, cyclophosphamide**, or etoposide**, as well as total body irradiation. The probability of developing this condition is also increased by fludarabine**, sirolimus, and calcineurin inhibitors. In addition, risks for VOD development include pre-existing liver dysfunction (cirrhosis, fibrosis), hepatitis C, and hepatic iron overload (serum ferritin >1000 ng/dL).
The diagnosis of VOD is established based on the following criteria:
Presence of two or more symptoms:
Thrombocytopenia refractory to platelet transfusions
Unexplained weight gain within 3 days despite diuretic therapy, or weight gain >5% from baseline
Hepatomegaly
Ascites
Increase in bilirubin level above baseline for 3 days or >2 mg/dL over 72 hours
VOD prophylaxis includes selecting a conditioning regimen in accordance with VOD risk factor analysis, in particular avoiding high doses of busulfan** and combinations of alkylating agents in patients with pre-existing liver damage. Medications used in VOD prophylaxis and therapy are summarized below.
c. Mucositis [98]
Damage to the mucous membrane of the gastrointestinal tract caused by the cytotoxicity of chemotherapy drugs and radiation therapy included in the conditioning regimen. The main risk factors are the composition of the conditioning regimen and the doses of antineoplastic agents. The localization of the lesion varies from localized forms (stomatitis, esophagitis, gastritis, enterocolitis) to generalized damage. A certain contribution to the development of mucositis is made by infections, in particular herpes simplex virus and Candida species. Clinical manifestations of mucositis include pain syndrome, edema, hyperemia and ulceration of the mucosa, dysphagia, and diarrhea syndrome. Mucositis prophylaxis includes oral hygiene, dental care at the patient preparation stage for HSCT, pharmacological suppression of gastric secretion, and antacids. Mucositis therapy is symptomatic, with the central task being adequate pain relief and treatment with antiseptic and disinfecting agents.
d. Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES) [99]
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). A specific neurological complication of HSCT based on local subcortical reversible vasogenic edema of the brain tissue. It is characteristically associated with calcineurin inhibitor therapy and arterial hypertension. The clinical picture includes headache, seizures, visual disturbances, encephalopathy, and focal neurological deficits. The diagnosis is verified by characteristic changes on brain MRI. Therapy includes withdrawal of drugs associated with PRES development and control of arterial hypertension.
e. Respiratory Distress Syndrome [100]
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a frequent complication after HSCT and may develop as part of a septic process, engraftment syndrome, cytokine release syndrome, or transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI). RDS in HSCT recipients is caused by increased permeability of the pulmonary capillary bed and the development of non-cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Clinically manifested by respiratory failure, hypoxemia, and crepitant rales upon auscultation. Imaging is characterized by diffuse reduction in lung transparency. No specific RDS prophylaxis has been developed. Therapy includes respiratory support, ranging from oxygen supplementation to mechanical ventilation, high doses of corticosteroids, and strict fluid balance management.
f. Thrombotic Microangiopathy [101]
HSCT-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) is a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and consumption thrombocytopenia due to clot formation in the microvasculature, which causes ischemic organ damage.
During the development of TA-TMA, endothelial damage leads to the activation of inflammatory and procoagulant cascades, ultimately resulting in capillary occlusion. However, unlike other endothelial syndromes, complement dysregulation may play a role in the development of TA-TMA. This, in turn, promotes the production of the C4d complement fraction and the C5b-9 membrane attack complex. Clinical and laboratory manifestations are presented in Table 7. Risk factors for TA-TMA include the use of calcineurin inhibitors, viral infections (CMV, adenovirus, BK virus, and others), fungal infections, and GVHD. Therapy for TA-TMA includes dose reduction or discontinuation of calcineurin inhibitors, syndromic supportive care, and targeted pharmacotherapy (see below).
15. Nutritional Support [102]
HSCT recipients face significant nutritional deficiency caused by a combination of factors: stomatitis, esophagitis, gastroenterocolitis, disruption of the gut microbiome, loss of appetite, nausea/vomiting, and thermal processing of food. Correction of nutritional insufficiency is based on clinical nutrition technologies, including enteral and parenteral nutrition. Enteral and parenteral drugs used in the clinical nutrition of HSCT recipients are listed below.
16. Transfusion Therapy [103]
During HSCT, the recipient's hematopoiesis is replaced by donor hematopoiesis. This process involves transient hematopoietic aplasia, lasting from several days to several weeks. Hematopoietic aplasia, by definition, develops in the first 2–3 weeks following conditioning, but may also occur at later times post-HSCT as a result of graft dysfunction of various etiologies. The following blood components are used in replacement transfusion therapy:
1. Packed red blood cells
2. Platelet concentrate
3. Granulocyte concentrate
4. Fresh frozen plasma
The donor and recipient may be incompatible across various blood group antigen systems. Depending on the type of ABO incompatibility, major (major), minor (minor), and mixed (major+minor) types are distinguished. Major ABO incompatibility (major) implies the presence of agglutinins in the recipient's plasma that are active against donor red blood cells, for example, when performing HSCT from a donor with blood group A(II) to a patient with blood group O(I). Minor ABO incompatibility (minor) is due to the reverse situation, i.e., the presence of agglutinins in the HSC donor's plasma active against the recipient's red blood cells, for example, during HSCT from a donor with blood group O(I) to a recipient with blood group A(II). Mixed (major+minor) incompatibility occurs when both the donor and the recipient have agglutinins active against the recipient's and donor's red blood cells, respectively. Due to the likelihood of severe complications associated with ABO blood group incompatibility between the HSC donor and recipient, rules for transfusion therapy following transplantation (starting from the day of myeloinfusion) have been formulated, as shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Rules for transfusion therapy in patients after HSCT
ABO incompatibility | Recipient | Donor | Packed RBCs | Platelets and FFP |
Major | 0 | A | 0 | A, AB |
0 | B | 0 | B, AB | |
0 | AB | 0 | AB | |
A | AB | A, 0 | AB | |
B | AB | B, 0 | AB | |
Minor | A | 0 | 0 | A, AB |
B | 0 | 0 | B, AB | |
AB | 0 | 0 | AB | |
AB | A | A, 0 | AB | |
AB | B | B, 0 | AB | |
Mixed | A | B | 0 | AB |
B | A | 0 | AB |
Prophylaxis of post-transfusion graft-versus-host disease.
Post-transfusion (blood component transfusion-associated) graft-versus-host disease (PT-GVHD) is one of the most severe and in most cases fatal complications in immunocompromised patients. The pathogenesis of PT-GVHD is based on the engraftment of T-lymphocytes transfused along with blood components, their subsequent activation, proliferation, and cytotoxic damage to various recipient target organs, such as the skin, liver, intestines, and bone marrow. In rare cases, PT-GVHD can sometimes also develop in immunocompetent patients, for example, when the donor and recipient share similar HLA haplotypes.
The standard procedure for the prevention of transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GVHD) is gamma irradiation of blood components at a dose of 25 Gy [104].
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix C. Patient Information
Aplastic anemia (AA) is a condition in which the patient's bone marrow stops producing sufficient quantities of all major blood cell types – red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. Hence the name of the disease: it combines anemia (insufficient red blood cell count, low hemoglobin level) and hematopoietic aplasia (suppression of all blood cell production).
Aplastic anemia is a rare disease, with an incidence of about 2–6 cases per million population per year. AA can occur in both children and adults; it is believed that peak incidence occurs in young adulthood (15–30 years) and then in the elderly (over 60 years). Men and women are affected with equal frequency.
In the vast majority of cases, the cause of the disease is unknown – this is referred to as idiopathic AA. However, sometimes the disease is associated with certain congenital disorders or external factors: the use of certain medications (quinine, chloramphenicol, etc.), work with toxic substances (herbicides, insecticides, certain solvents including benzene), radiation, or prior infections (hepatitis viruses, Epstein-Barr virus, HIV; possibly also cytomegalovirus).
It is believed that idiopathic AA typically has an autoimmune origin, meaning it occurs when the body's immune system for some reason begins to attack its own bone marrow cells.
Manifestations of aplastic anemia are associated with pancytopenia – a deficiency of all types of blood cells.
Erythrocyte deficiency – paleness, weakness, shortness of breath, palpitations, dizziness, headaches.
Platelet deficiency – bleeding, including nasal and gingival bleeding; appearance of bruising and petechiae (small subcutaneous hemorrhages).
Leukocyte deficiency – low resistance to infections. Infectious diseases that are poorly responsive to therapy or frequently recurring may occur.
Aplastic anemia varies in severity: mild, moderate, severe, and very severe forms of AA are distinguished.
AA can be suspected if a child presents with the listed complaints and symptoms, and confirmed based on complete blood count results, which show a sharp decrease in erythrocyte, leukocyte, and platelet counts. Other clinical and laboratory studies are also performed, but the definitive diagnosis is established only by analyzing a bone marrow sample obtained via aspiration and trephine biopsy. Bone marrow examination is necessary to rule out other possible causes of blood cell deficiency, such as leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes, myelofibrosis, etc.
In aplastic anemia, bone marrow examination indicates aplasia or hypoplasia of hematopoiesis – meaning the bone marrow practically does not produce blood cells or produces them in significantly fewer numbers than required.
During diagnostic evaluation, it is also essential to reliably distinguish AA from congenital Fanconi anemia, as the treatment for these diseases (including bone marrow transplantation protocols) differs markedly. Special tests (such as the DEB test) may be used to confirm or exclude Fanconi anemia.
Treatment of severe and very severe AA must be initiated immediately after diagnosis, as the condition of severe deficiency of all blood cells is life-threatening.
If the development of AA is caused by a specific external factor (drugs, radiation), this factor must be eliminated first. However, as already mentioned, an external triggering factor for the disease can be identified in only a very small number of cases.
Since AA is presumed to be autoimmune in nature, immunosuppressive therapy is widely used for its treatment – that is, therapy aimed at suppressing the immune system, which «attacks» bone marrow cells. Typically, such therapy includes antithymocyte globulin** (ATG**) combined with #ciclosporin**; systemic corticosteroids may be used to prevent side effects of ATG**. Response to this therapy usually develops slowly: in successful cases, the bone marrow gradually recovers a few weeks or months after drug administration and begins producing healthy cells.
Hospitalization is generally required to administer a course of immunosuppressive therapy with ATG**. The main complications during treatment are infections and bleeding. If there is no response to the first course of therapy, a repeated course may be administered. Immunosvuppressive therapy is effective in approximately 70% of cases. Unfortunately, some patients experience relapses of the disease afterward.
Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, if successful, leads to a complete cure. Transplantation is particularly preferred when the patient is young and has a fully matched related donor (brother or sister). In the absence of a related donor, the use of a matched unrelated donor or a haploidentical related donor (haploidentical transplantation) is acceptable. Previously, it was believed that transplants from unrelated or partially matched donors in AA carried very high risks, but their outcomes have improved significantly now.
During the treatment of AA, intensive supportive care with blood components (transfusions of donor platelets, red blood cells, and sometimes granulocytes in severe infections) is often required. However, if bone marrow transplantation is planned, it must be kept in mind that multiple transfusions prior to transplantation increase the likelihood of graft rejection.
Prevention and treatment of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections, which pose a major danger to AA patients, are very important. Effective combinations of systemic antibacterial and systemic antifungal drugs are used for treatment, sometimes over a long period.
Growth factors – medications that help the bone marrow produce necessary cells – are also used as adjunctive therapy. These include granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, which stimulates leukocyte production, and erythropoietin-group drugs (ATC group B03XA), which stimulate erythrocyte production.
Without treatment, patients with severe forms of aplastic anemia die within a few months. However, with modern adequate treatment, the prognosis is quite good.
As already mentioned, immunosuppressive therapy is effective in many cases. Patients may feel well for a long time after such therapy, but some experience a relapse (return) of the disease. Regular check-ups, primarily blood tests, are necessary for the timely detection of relapse.
Bone marrow transplantation from both related and unrelated donors is associated with certain risks, primarily immune and infectious complications. However, if the transplantation is successful, complete remission and cure are achieved.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale
Original title: The ECOG Scale of Performance Status
Source: Oken M.M. et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1982;5(6):649–65 [105]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: clinical assessment of the patient's general condition
Content and interpretation:
Status (scores) | Description of the patient's general condition |
0 | Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction. |
1 | Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (e.g., light housework, office work). |
2 | Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours. |
3 | Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours. |
4 | Completely disabled; cannot carry on any self-care; totally confined to bed or chair. |
5 | Death |