List of Abbreviations
AA — aplastic anemia
allo-HSCT – allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
ATG – antithymocyte globulin**
ALT – alanine aminotransferase
AST - aspartate aminotransferase
aPTT – activated partial thromboplastin time
ULN – upper limit of normal
HAA – hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia
G-CSF – colony-stimulating factors (L03AA according to the ATC classification)
GPI – glycosylphosphatidylinositol
IL – interleukin
IST – immunosuppressive therapy
IFNγ – interferon gamma**
CT – clinical trials
BM – bone marrow
CT – computed tomography
LDH – lactate dehydrogenase
MDS — myelodysplastic syndrome
MonAb – monoclonal antibodies
NAA – non-severe aplastic anemia
PNH — paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria
AML – acute myeloid leukemia
CR – complete remission
PT – prothrombin index
VSAA – very severe aplastic anemia
HSC — hematopoietic stem cell
SAA – severe aplastic anemia
HSCT – hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
LCE – level of confidence of evidence
US – ultrasound examination
GRS – grade of recommendation strength
TNFα – tumor necrosis factor alpha
Cs – #ciclosporin**
PR – partial remission
ECG – electrocardiography
EchoCG – echocardiography
CD – clusters of differentiation
HLA – human leukocyte antigens
PIG-A – phosphatidylinositol glycan class A
Th – T-helper cells
Treg – T-regulatory cells
NK – natural killer cells
FISH – fluorescence in situ hybridization
Terms and Definitions
Aplastic anemia (AA) is a hematologic disorder characterized by pancytopenia resulting from bone marrow aplasia, associated with impaired immune mechanisms of hematopoiesis regulation, quantitative deficiency, and functional defects of hematopoietic stem cells
Combined immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in patients with AA is performed according to a protocol including antithymocyte globulin of animal origin for human use (ATG)** and ciclosporin (Cs)**.
Programmed treatment of patients with AA is a set of therapeutic measures performed step-by-step from the moment of disease diagnosis, implemented according to a specific algorithm, including ATG**, Cs**, and, if necessary, repeated courses of ATG and other treatment methods that allow achieving long-term patient survival.
Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clone (PNH clone) is a hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) clone with a mutation in the PIG-A gene, leading to impaired synthesis of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI).
Complete remission is complete normalization of hemogram parameters
Partial remission is partial normalization of hemogram parameters (hemoglobin 90–100.0 g/L, granulocytes >1.0–1.5 × 109/L, platelets >100 × 109/L) and no need for blood component replacement therapy.
Clinico-hematological improvement (minimal hematological response) is improvement in hemogram parameters (hemoglobin 70.0–85 g/L, granulocytes >0.5–1.0 × 109/L, platelets >20.0 × 109/L), disappearance or significant reduction of dependence on blood component transfusions.
Refractory AA is diagnosed in the absence of a response to ongoing combined IST at 6–9 months from the start of IST treatment or after the second stage of treatment (after the second course of ATG**).
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Aplastic anemia is a hematologic disorder characterized by pancytopenia resulting from bone marrow aplasia, associated with impaired immune mechanisms of hematopoiesis regulation, quantitative deficiency, and functional defects of HSCs.
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
One of the leading mechanisms of hematopoietic impairment in AA is considered to be immune aggression directed against hematopoietic progenitor cells [1].
Bone marrow failure in AA develops as a result of the suppression of hematopoietic progenitor cell proliferation by activated T lymphocytes and natural killer cells. Activation of T lymphocytes, expansion of cytotoxic T clones, and release of mediators of immune suppression of hematopoiesis (interferon gamma [IFNγ], tumor necrosis factor alpha) or those stimulating T-lymphocyte proliferation and activation (interleukin-2) lead to impaired proliferation and stimulation of progenitor cell apoptosis, resulting in a significant reduction in the hematopoietic cell pool and the development of bone marrow aplasia [1–3].
Reduction of the bone marrow hematopoietic cell pool is accompanied by impaired iron metabolism and deposition of toxic iron in both the bone marrow and the myocardium and liver, which causes dysfunction of these organs [1].
The main clinical manifestations of the disease are anemia syndrome, hemorrhagic syndrome, and severe infectious complications [2]. In addition, the course of AA can be complicated by the development of clonal diseases such as paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The incidence of clonal complications can reach 32% within 10 years [3, 4]. The appearance of clonal hematopoiesis can be detected at earlier stages of the course of AA as well. This primarily refers to AA occurring with a PNH clone [5, 6]. At the same time, the detection of a clone with a deficiency of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) proteins does not mean the development of PNH as an independent disease with the picture of classical intravascular hemolysis. The size of the PNH clone during the course of AA can change until complete disappearance [7]. Evolution into classical PNH, according to various authors, is 11–17% [8–10].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
According to epidemiological studies, aplastic anemia occurs with varying frequencies in regions such as Europe, North America, and the Far and Middle East; meanwhile, according to the International Agranulocytosis and Aplastic Anemia Study, the prevalence of AA in European countries is 2 cases per 1 million population per year, with this indicator fluctuating depending on the specific country from 0.6 to 3 or more cases per 1 million population per year [11].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
Other aplastic anemias (D61)
D61.1 – Drug-induced aplastic anemia
D61.3 – Idiopathic aplastic anemia
D61.8 – Other specified aplastic anemias
D61.9 – Aplastic anemia, unspecified
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
Acquired AA:
Idiopathic AA
Secondary AA
Radiation
Drugs and chemical toxins
Viruses
Immunopathology
Pregnancy
The following criteria for the severity of acquired AA are distinguished:
non-severe AA: granulocytopenia >0.5 × 109/L;
severe AA: granulocytopenia <0.5 × 109/L, thrombocytopenia <20.0 × 109/L);
very severe (extremely severe) AA: granulocytopenia <0.2 × 109/L.
When determining the severity of AA, the results of at least three peripheral blood tests at the time of disease diagnosis before the start of treatment are taken into account [12, 13].
It is also customary to distinguish three clinical variants of AA depending on the detection of a PNH clone:
AA occurring without a PNH clone
AA occurring with a PNH clone
AA occurring with PNH syndrome (subclinical or clinical signs of intravascular hemolysis)
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
The manifestation of clinical manifestations of AA is accompanied by complaints of an anemia nature, the development of hemorrhagic syndrome of varying intensity, and infectious complications against the background of profound tri-lineage cytopenia. These manifestations can develop acutely or increase gradually, depending on the severity of AA.
The clinical picture of AA, especially in severe and very severe forms of the disease, can be influenced by clinical symptoms of complications, including life-threatening ones, which often develop in patients with AA both before and during treatment. The most common complications include bacterial, viral, and fungal infections, including septic shock, renal failure, hemorrhagic complications including intracranial hemorrhages and menorrhagia, neurological and psychiatric disorders; peptic ulcer disease and/or aseptic osteonecrosis may develop during glucocorticosteroid therapy.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Many recommended methods for diagnosing the disease and related conditions have a limited evidence base in accordance with the grading scales for the levels of evidence certainty (LEC) and levels of clinical recommendation consensus (LCRC) due to the lack of clinical studies devoted to them. Despite this, they are necessary elements of patient examination to establish a diagnosis and choose treatment tactics, since more effective and proven methods have not been developed at present.
The diagnosis of AA is established based on clinical manifestations and laboratory examination data.
Tri-lineage cytopenia: anemia (hemoglobin <110 g/L), granulocytopenia (granulocytes <2.0 × 109/L), thrombocytopenia (platelets <100.0 × 109/L).
Decreased bone marrow (BM) cellularity and absence of megakaryocytes according to BM aspiration data.
BM aplasia in an iliac crest biopsy (predominance of fatty BM).
The following criteria for AA severity are distinguished:
non-severe AA: granulocytopenia >0.5 × 109/L;
severe AA: granulocytopenia <0.5 × 109/L, thrombocytopenia <20.0 × 109/L);
very severe (extremely severe) AA: granulocytopenia <0.2 × 109/L).
When determining the severity of AA, the results of at least three peripheral blood tests at the time of disease diagnosis prior to the initiation of treatment are taken into account [14, 15].
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
It is recommended that all patients with suspected AA undergo a history-taking and symptom assessment. Anamnestic data should identify any connection with potential toxic or medicinal agents or association with viral hepatitis B and C. A thorough family history is necessary to exclude congenital anomalies, as well as to clarify the presence of siblings to consider the possibility of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) [13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: the history of the disease should describe all episodes of infectious complications, administered antibacterial therapy, and bacteriological culture data. A full description of the frequency of and need for ongoing transfusion therapy is required, along with data collection on post-transfusion complications.
It is recommended that all patients with suspected AA undergo an initial consultation (examination, consultation) with a hematologist to establish a diagnosis [13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
2.2 Physical Examination
It is recommended that all patients with suspected AA, as well as all patients with AA at each consultation (examination, consultation): physical examination (including the oral mucosa and tonsils), measurement of height and body weight, body temperature, assessment of the osteoarticular system, detection of signs of hemorrhagic syndrome, auscultation of the heart and lungs, palpation of peripheral lymph nodes, thyroid gland, and abdominal organs to assess non-hematological anomalies that may indicate the presence of constitutional AA [13, 14, 16].
GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)
Comments: during the physical examination, it is necessary to differentiate anomalies characteristic of constitutional forms of AA (stature, facial features, skin pigmentation, nail dystrophy, mucosal leukoplakia, eye development anomalies, dental anomalies, premature graying and hair loss, hypogonadism, etc.).
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
It is recommended that all patients with suspected AA, all patients with established AA once a week until a response is achieved, thereafter once a month, as well as upon the development of hemorrhagic syndrome, undergo the following tests to verify the diagnosis and assess disease dynamics: complete blood count (CBC) with differential, reticulocyte count in the blood, platelet count in the blood [13, 17].
GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)
Comments: to determine the severity of AA, 3 consecutive blood tests are required. During treatment monitoring, the complete (clinical) blood count is performed twice a week until a response is achieved, and thereafter once a month [12].
It is recommended for all patients with suspected AA, and all patients with established AA twice a week until a response is achieved, including before each course of therapy, as well as in the event of hemorrhagic syndrome: general clinical biochemical blood test (determination of total bilirubin in the blood, blood urea nitrogen, serum creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity in the blood, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity in the blood, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in the blood), to assess the general condition of the patient, organ and system functions, and to monitor IST complications [13, 18].
GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)
It is recommended for all patients with AA at the initial examination, prior to specific therapy, including before each course of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) (as indicated), as well as in the case of hemorrhagic complications at any stage of observation and treatment of a hematological patient, to perform a coagulogram (screening hemostasis test) evaluating the following parameters: activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time or prothrombin ratio in blood or plasma, and plasma fibrinogen level [19, 20].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: to study hemostatic parameters, blood collection must be performed strictly on an empty stomach using vacuum collection tubes. Blood collection from catheters is prohibited. Blood is collected into tubes containing 3.2% sodium citrate at a 1:9 ratio. The test must be performed no later than 2 hours after blood collection. The reliability of platelet aggregation results can only be assessed when the blood platelet count is ≥ 100×109/L.
It is recommended for all patients with suspected AA, as well as those receiving therapy (especially supportive blood component therapy) for AA: serum ferritin level, iron deficiency anemia diagnostic panel to assess the degree of iron overload [1, 21].
GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)
Comments: frequent donor red blood cell transfusions may lead to secondary hemosiderosis of organs and tissues.
It is recommended for all patients during the diagnosis of AA, as well as during AA therapy every 6–12 months until a response is achieved: obtaining a cytological preparation via puncture (sternal puncture) and bone marrow smear cytological examination (myelogram) to assess the cellular composition of bone marrow hematopoiesis — ruling out hematological malignancies and bone marrow involvement by solid tumor metastases [22]
GCP CLE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)
Comments: in AA, the bone marrow aspirate is hypocellular, relative lymphocytosis is determined, and megakaryocytes are absent. Sternal puncture can be performed in patients with severe thrombocytopenia without prior transfusion preparation [23].
It is recommended for all patients at the time of AA diagnosis to undergo standard cytogenetic testing (karyotype) of bone marrow cells and molecular-cytogenetic testing (FISH method) for a single chromosome pair (FISH assay for monosomy 7) for differential diagnosis with MDS [24–26].
GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)
Comments: the detection of clonal aberrations characteristic of MDS rules out the diagnosis of acquired AA. FISH testing using probes most characteristic of MDS/AML (to determine chromosome 7 anomalies, trisomy 8, 5q deletion) is necessary despite the absence of cytogenetic aberrations or mitoses in standard cytogenetic testing.
It is recommended for all patients at the time of AA diagnosis, as well as during AA therapy every 6–12 months until a response is achieved, to obtain a bone marrow histological preparation and perform a pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material [12, 13, 27]
GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)
Comments: bilateral trephine biopsy of the anterior or posterior iliac spines must be performed
It is recommended for all patients with suspected AA and an expanded erythroid series identified in the bone marrow aspirate to perform cytochemical examination of the bone marrow smear [28–30].
GCP CLE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)
Comments: determination of the number of sideroblasts and siderocytes using the cytochemical method. Detection of ring sideroblasts in an amount exceeding 5% requires additional investigation to rule out MDS.
It is recommended that all patients with suspected AA, as well as all patients with confirmed AA, undergo peripheral blood cell immunophenotyping every 6–12 months to diagnose paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria using an expanded marker panel, including FLAER (fluorescently labeled aerolysin), to detect the PNH clone; determination of blood lactate dehydrogenase activity to assess clinical and laboratory signs of hemolysis [10, 31–33].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: the detection of a PNH clone, regardless of the percentage of GPI-deficient cells among granulocytes, erythrocytes, and monocytes, does not rule out the diagnosis of AA.
It is recommended for all patients during AA diagnosis to perform a direct antiglobulin test (direct Coombs test) to rule out autoimmune hemolytic anemia [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: a positive test result casts doubt on the diagnosis of AA.
It is recommended for all patients during AA diagnosis, as well as all patients with established AA every 2–4 weeks until a response is achieved, and thereafter once a month: urinalysis (clinical) to detect concomitant pathology and assess therapy toxicity [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for all patients at the time of AA diagnosis to be screened for syphilis, HIV, viral hepatitis, and herpesviruses to rule out concomitant pathology or complications [12, 34]:
1) Determination of antibodies to Treponema pallidum in blood by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or determination of antibodies to Treponema pallidum using nontreponemal tests (RPR, VDRL) (qualitative and semi-quantitative assay) in blood serum;
2) Determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV 1) in blood; determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV 2) in blood;
3) Determination of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) (Hepatitis B virus) in blood and determination of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C virus) in blood;
4) Determination of antibodies to herpes simplex virus (Herpes simplex virus) in blood; determination of antibodies to human herpesvirus type 6 (Herpes-virus 6) in blood; determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein - Barr virus) in blood; determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus) in blood.
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for patients with AA who are scheduled for IST, upon hospitalization, to undergo microbiological (culture) examination of mucus from the tonsils and posterior pharyngeal wall for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: determining the colonization of the oral cavity by opportunistic antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains is necessary for selecting appropriate antibiotic therapy, as well as for potential antibiotic prophylaxis.
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) stool examination for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms in patients with aplastic anemia scheduled for immunosuppressive therapy upon hospitalization [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: determining the intestinal colonization by opportunistic antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains is necessary for selecting appropriate antibiotic therapy, as well as for potential antibiotic prophylaxis.
It is recommended to determine the main blood groups by the AB0 system, Rh antigen D (Rh factor), phenotype by C, c, E, e, Cw, K, k antigens, and screen for anti-erythrocyte antibodies in all patients with aplastic anemia to select transfusion media and minimize transfusion reactions [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: Considering the high frequency of transfusions and the subsequent development of sensitization to donor blood components and erythrocyte chimera, packed red blood cell transfusions should be performed taking into account the phenotype.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram in all patients upon diagnosis of aplastic anemia, throughout the period of immunosuppressive therapy, and when indications arise, to assess cardiac function and identify potential contraindications for specific treatment [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to perform a brain computed tomography (CT) scan in all patients with aplastic anemia and/or receiving immunosuppressive therapy for aplastic anemia to rule out hemorrhagic stroke or infectious brain lesions [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to perform a chest computed tomography scan in patients with aplastic anemia receiving immunosuppressive therapy with suspected infectious complications of the therapy [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: to identify small-caliber infectious foci not visualized on radiography in accordance with the algorithms presented in Appendix A.
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive ultrasound examination of the abdominal organs, kidneys, and pelvis (transvaginal and transabdominal) in women over 18 years of age, ultrasound examination of the prostate gland in men over 40 years of age, and ultrasound examination of lymph nodes (one anatomical region) in all patients evaluated for aplastic anemia to detect comorbid pathology [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: Abdominal ultrasound (comprehensive) is performed to assess the size of the liver and spleen and the presence of lymphadenopathy; pelvic ultrasound in women and prostate ultrasound in men are performed to rule out pathological neoplasms; peripheral and intra-abdominal lymph nodes are evaluated to rule out lymphadenopathy.
It is recommended to perform echocardiography (EchoCG) in all patients evaluated for aplastic anemia to detect comorbid pathology [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to perform one or more of the following examinations (depending on the localization of hemorrhages) in all patients with aplastic anemia and hemorrhagic syndrome to determine its extent and severity, based on clinical indications [19, 20]:
esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD);
colonoscopy;
bronchoscopy;
comprehensive ultrasound examination (ultrasound) of the abdominal organs, urinary tract, retroperitoneal space, comprehensive pelvic organs (transvaginal and transabdominal), joints (in the presence of hemarthrosis);
computed tomography (CT) of the chest, brain, and abdominal organs;
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain.
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
2.5 Other Procedures
Patients with aplastic anemia, especially with severe and very severe forms of the disease, often develop complications, including life-threatening ones, that require diagnostic examinations and treatment directly in the hematology department during the diagnosis and treatment of aplastic anemia due to the specific approaches used in hematology.
It is recommended for all patients over 18 years of age upon diagnosis of aplastic anemia: determination of antibodies to nuclear antigens and DNA to exclude systemic connective tissue diseases [13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for all patients with aplastic anemia refractory to immunosuppressive therapy: bone marrow cell examination by differential chromosome staining to detect clonal tumor cells in order to exclude genetic abnormalities characteristic of myelodysplastic syndrome [25].
GCP CLE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)
It is recommended for all patients with suspected constitutional aplastic anemia: chromosome breakage test using a bifunctional alkylating agent (diepoxybutane) to exclude Fanconi anemia, and gene panel sequencing for Fanconi anemia and congenital dyskeratosis [13, 36].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for all patients upon diagnosis of aplastic anemia, confirmation of refractory aplastic anemia, as well as their siblings, to perform molecular genetic HLA histocompatibility testing (high-resolution sequencing) to select a related bone marrow donor and consult at a transplant center to choose the treatment method [13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for patients upon diagnosis of aplastic anemia, in the presence of clinical and/or laboratory indications, to have an initial consultation (examination) with a rheumatologist for differential diagnosis with systemic connective tissue diseases [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for patients upon diagnosis of aplastic anemia, in the presence of hemorrhagic syndrome, to have an initial consultation (examination) with an ophthalmologist for the diagnosis of comorbid pathology [12, 13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for patients upon diagnosis of aplastic anemia, in the presence of infectious, hemorrhagic, and other ENT complications, to have an initial consultation (examination) with an otorhinolaryngologist for the diagnosis of comorbid pathology [12, 13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for patients upon diagnosis of aplastic anemia, in the presence of hemorrhagic, infectious, or other nervous system lesions, to have an initial consultation (examination) with a neurologist for the diagnosis of comorbid pathology [12, 13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for patients with aplastic anemia undergoing scheduled immunosuppressive therapy to have clinical and laboratory monitoring of immunosuppressive therapy (allergic and anaphylactic reactions during antithymocyte globulin (ATG)** administration and serum sickness) [12, 13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: main complications of ATG therapy: allergic and anaphylactic reactions during ATG** administration and serum sickness. Allergic and anaphylactic reactions: chills, fever, erythematous or urticarial rash occur in 30–60% of patients. In these cases, the doses of administered glucocorticoids and systemic antihistamines are increased by 1.5–2 times and, if possible, ATG** administration is continued.
Bronchospasm, angioedema, and arterial hypotension develop much less frequently (in 2–3% of patients). In these cases, ATG** administration is stopped and appropriate treatment is administered.
Serum sickness usually develops on days 7–14 (days 5–20) from the start of therapy in more than 50% of patients. Fever, papular skin rashes, pruritus, polyarthralgia, myalgia, headache, and nausea are the most common symptoms of serum sickness; transient increases in aminotransferase activity, elevated blood pressure, and gastrointestinal disturbances are observed less frequently; epileptic seizures may occur in 1–2% of cases. The administration of systemic antihistamines (H1-receptor blockers) and glucocorticoids (prednisolone** 30–60 mg/day) for 1–2 weeks generally relieves serum sickness. In severe cases, plasmapheresis sessions are performed.
To prevent the development of severe allergic complications, it is recommended to strictly perform intradermal skin sensitivity tests to the drug immediately before ATG** administration.
Exacerbation of hemorrhagic syndrome during or after ATG** administration requires intensive replacement therapy with platelet concentrates and fresh frozen plasma.
Main complications of #cyclosporine** therapy
The most frequent complication is renal dysfunction associated with the nephrotoxicity of the drug; this is accompanied by increased serum creatinine, peripheral edema, and oliguria. Arterial hypertension, finger tremor, paresthesias, headaches, and, rarely, encephalopathy are also common. Gingival hyperplasia is observed in one-third of patients. Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea occur in 10–13% of cases. Hyperbilirubinemia can be detected in 30% of patients, but elevated hepatic aminotransferase activity is much less common. Electrolyte disturbances such as hyperkalemia and hypomagnesemia may occur. In some cases, gynecomastia, hypertrichosis, and allergic reactions (allergic rash) are observed. It should be noted that these complications most frequently appear against the background of the maximum dose of #ciclosporin** (10 mg/kg/day) during the first 2–3 weeks of therapy.
Toxic complications of #ciclosporin** therapy are generally managed by reducing the daily dose (by 25–50%) or temporarily discontinuing the drug. In some cases, concomitant symptomatic therapy is required.
Diagnosis of infectious complications.
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia, upon the development of infectious complications, follow the diagnostic algorithm for verifying the foci of infection applicable to patients in a state of profound neutropenia [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: Infectious complications during IST occur in the majority of patients with aplastic anemia. Bacterial infections predominate in the early stages of therapy; subsequently, as the period of granulocytopenia prolongs and immunosuppression intensifies, opportunistic infections caused by fungi (primarily Aspergillus spp.), Pneumocystis, and herpesviruses become dominant [2, 9].
Features of infectious complications recorded in aplastic anemia include a high pathogen detection rate (microbiologically documented infections account for up to 75%) and the predominance of mixed flora in the etiology of the infectious process. Infections caused by various microorganisms can be detected either at the "start" of infectious complications or arise sequentially during the treatment of these complications. The first symptom of infection is fever. Fever in the presence of granulocytopenia (neutropenia) is considered infectious if the body temperature rises above 380C, persists for 2 hours, and is not associated with the administration of pyrogenic drugs.
The most frequent infectious complications developing during #ciclosporin** administration are Pneumocystis pneumonia and herpetic infections. Pulmonary involvement caused by these microorganisms is diagnosed by bronchoalveolar lavage using a comprehensive panel of tests that includes enzyme immunoassay and PCR [12, 37]
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia, upon the development of febrile fever, follow the diagnostic algorithm for pathogen verification applicable to patients in a state of profound neutropenia [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: the main factor determining the development of infectious complications in hematological patients is neutropenia (neutrophils <0.5 x 109/L) or leukopenia (leukocytes ≤1.0 x 109/L), as well as the duration of neutropenia—the frequency of infections increases significantly when the duration of neutropenia exceeds 10 days. The risk of developing infections increases with impaired neutrophil phagocytic function, cellular and humoral immunity defects, damage to the gastrointestinal mucosa (especially grade III–IV mucositis), and the presence of a central venous catheter (CVC). The source of infection is usually the gastrointestinal tract, where active translocation of microorganisms occurs from the mucosa damaged as a result of chemotherapy. Other main portals of entry for infection in neutropenia are CVCs.
The etiological structure of pathogens in hematological patients is diverse and includes bacteria, fungi (yeast and mold), and herpesviruses. In the first 7–10 days, the infectious process is usually caused by bacteria, and as neutropenia prolongs, the risk of invasive aspergillosis increases [75]. In the etiology of bloodstream infections, gram-negative bacteria account for 49.7%, gram-positive bacteria for 42.7%, and yeast-like fungi for 7.4% [77]. The main causative agents of sepsis are Escherichia coli (17.8%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (17.4%), Enterococcus spp. (10.3%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7.6%), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (8.2%). In recent years, the detection of Acinetobacter spp. and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has increased, placing them among the top five gram-negative bacteria in bloodstream infections after E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa.
The main resistance mechanisms in enterobacteria are the production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) in 40–50% of cases, and the detection of carbapenemases, predominantly in K. pneumoniae (10–30%). The resistance of P. aeruginosa to carbapenems and colistin is 40–50% and 29%, respectively, and that of Acinetobacter baumannii strains to carbapenems is 65–70% [78]. Among gram-positive bacteria, vancomycin resistance was noted in Enterococcus faecium (15%). Candida species are characterized by a decrease in the proportion of C. albicans to 30% and a wide species diversity of non-albicans Candida [77].
Characteristic signs of infections during the neutropenia/leukopenia period are
scarcity of clinical manifestations;
the probability of simultaneous presence of different pathogens and different localization of the infectious process;
the possibility of the emergence of other pathogens and another localization of the infectious process as the period of neutropenia lengthens.
Fever is defined as a single recorded increase in body temperature of ≥38.0°C not associated with other causes (reactions to blood component transfusions, administered medications, tumor fever).
There is a generalizing term "febrile neutropenia", which includes all cases of febrile temperature in patients with neutropenia/leukopenia. Clinically documented infections are those that can be verified using physical or instrumental diagnostic methods in the absence of microbiological confirmation. The most frequent manifestations of clinically documented infections are pneumonia, soft tissue infection, perineal infection (including paraproctitis). Microbiological confirmation of infection during granulocytopenia is in most cases the isolation of microorganisms from blood culture.
It is recommended in all cases of probable or established infectious process in aplastic anemia patients to actively conduct diagnostics aimed at identifying both foci of infection and etiological agents [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: if infection is suspected, samples of clinical material from the patient must be taken immediately. Close attention and thorough microbiological studies are required in patients taking glucocorticoids and in elderly individuals, since in this group of patients 70% of severely ill patients older than 66 years may experience septicemia with normothermia or moderate subfebrile temperature.
In neutropenia, a thorough daily examination of the patient is performed, which, along with standard therapeutic examination standards, includes the following approaches:
active questioning of the patient regarding possible symptoms of infection, including the presence of pain along the esophagus, in the perineum;
daily examination of the oral mucosa in neutropenia, especially the periodontium. Attention is paid to friability, mucosal edema (mucositis), presence of plaque, ulcers;
inspection of the skin for the possible appearance of septicopyemic foci in case of fever, even in the absence of complaints (during glucocorticoid therapy, septicopyemic foci may occur at normal body temperature);
inspection of the venous catheter insertion site;
careful auscultation of the chest (harsh breath sounds in the absence of rales, a minimal number of moist rales in a limited area may be the initial manifestation of pneumonia);
thorough palpation of the abdomen (the first symptoms of pseudomembranous colitis are the appearance of pain or "gurgling" upon palpation in the right iliac region (cecal area).
It is recommended in aplastic anemia patients with a temperature of ≥38°C or the presence of septicopyemic skin lesions to perform a microbiological (culture) blood sterility test using an automated blood culture analyzer [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: blood is drawn simultaneously from a vein and a CVC, or from two different veins into 2–4 bottles (aerobic/anaerobic) intended for incubation in an automated blood culture analyzer. Based on the difference in the time to positivity of blood cultures drawn simultaneously from a CVC and a vein, CVC infection may be suspected. In this case, a positive blood culture from the CVC becomes positive 2 hours or more earlier than a positive blood culture from the vein. Blood for microbiological testing is collected with maximum adherence to asepsis rules, injecting 10 ml of the patient's blood into each bottle. Inoculating a smaller volume of blood reduces the likelihood of obtaining a positive blood culture. In bloodstream infections, the isolation of coagulase-negative staphylococci and Corynebacterium spp. must be confirmed by two positive blood cultures, since these microorganisms belong to the obligate microflora, and their detection in only one of the two bottles is considered contamination of the blood samples (obligate microflora).
The central venous catheter (CVC) is removed and sent for microbiological testing when catheter-related infection is suspected (difference in the time to positivity between blood cultures drawn simultaneously from a vein and a CVC), when yeast or mold fungi are isolated from blood cultures, or when a patient with a CVC is transferred from another inpatient facility (high probability of CVC infection). For bacteriological testing, an aseptically removed distal catheter segment 5–6 cm long is sent to the laboratory in a sterile container. CVC testing is performed using a semiquantitative (Maki roll plate) or quantitative method. Diagnostic confirmation of CVC infection is the isolation of microorganisms in an amount of ≥15 colony-forming units (CFU) by semiquantitative testing, or ≥103 CFU/ml by quantitative testing.
It is recommended that patients with AA who present with clinical symptoms of urinary tract infection, leukocyturia, and fever lasting more than 5 days during the neutropenia period undergo a microbiological (culture) urine test for bacterial pathogens using automated inoculation [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: for microbiological testing, a morning midstream urine sample is submitted, and tests are performed for various bacterial pathogens, starting with the most frequent ones in hematological practice (see below). Bacteriuria is diagnostically significant if a single microorganism is isolated in a count of ≥103 CFU/ml. The microbiological urine test is repeated the next day if two microorganisms are isolated in counts of ≥103 CFU/ml. Repeated isolation of the same microorganisms as in the first test confirms the presence of a urinary tract infection. In hematology, the most frequent causative agents of hospital-acquired urinary tract infections are Enterobacteriaceae, among them E. coli, followed by Enterococcus spp. and P. aeruginosa. Repeated isolation of Candida spp. from urine in patients with febrile neutropenia may indicate a high probability of disseminated invasive candidiasis. Rapid testing for antibiotic susceptibility to endotoxins is performed on all microorganisms isolated in diagnostically significant quantities in urine.
It is recommended that patients with AA who present with symptoms of meningitis, "cerebral" symptoms against the background of febrile neutropenia, or the detection of brain lesion(s) on computed tomography/spiral computed tomography (CT/SCT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) undergo microscopic examination of cerebrospinal fluid, cell counting in a counting chamber (determination of cytosis), microbiological (culture) examination of cerebrospinal fluid for Cryptococcus neoformans, PCR detection of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in cerebrospinal fluid, molecular biological testing of cerebrospinal fluid for Streptococcus pneumoniae (if cytosis is present), molecular biological testing of cerebrospinal fluid for Haemophilus influenzae (if cytosis is present), microbiological (culture) examination of cerebrospinal fluid for Neisseria meningitidis (if cytosis is present), molecular biological testing of cerebrospinal fluid for Streptococcus agalactiae (GBS) (if cytosis is present), and PCR detection of Toxoplasma gondii DNA in cerebrospinal fluid (if brain lesions are present) [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that patients with AA who present with diarrhea undergo stool testing for Clostridium difficile toxin; if this test result is negative, a microbiological (culture) stool test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms is performed [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: in patients with persistent febrile neutropenia and no positive blood culture, these microorganisms may be the cause of infection.
It is recommended that patients with AA who present with signs of stomatitis (mucositis) undergo a microbiological swab test of the tonsils and posterior pharyngeal wall for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: When gram-negative bacteria are isolated, species identification is performed, along with determination of susceptibility to systemic antimicrobial drugs, detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) production in Enterobacteriaceae, and the modified carbapenem inactivation method (mCIM) or carbapenem inactivation method (CIM) test to determine carbapenemase production among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa. In addition, PCR detection of acquired carbapenemase genes of the KPC and OXA-48-like groups in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs is performed if the mCIM (or CIM) test is positive. When yeast fungi are isolated from the oropharyngeal mucosa, only species identification is performed.
It is recommended that patients with AA presenting with perineal infection, inflammation or damage to the rectal mucosa (fissure, paraproctitis, etc.), patients with persistent febrile neutropenia lasting 4–5 days or more with no diagnostically significant results from clinical samples, as well as high-risk patients for infection screening upon hospital admission and then every 7 days until granulocytes recover or leukocytes are >1.0 × 109/l, undergo a microbiological (culture) stool test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms and fungi of the genus Candida (Candida spp.) [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: taking into account the isolated microorganisms, antimicrobial therapy may be adjusted if there are no diagnostically significant results from clinically relevant samples in patients with persistent febrile neutropenia. Attention is drawn to the isolation of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria – P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii, S. maltophilia, and ESBL- or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.
It is recommended that patients with AA who present with necrosis of the nasal passage mucosa undergo a microbiological (culture) test of nasopharyngeal washings for mold fungi and a molecular biological test of nasopharyngeal mucosa swabs for Staphylococcus aureus in patients with pyoderma [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that patients with AA who present with septicopryemic skin lesions (dermal infiltrates of any size that developed during hyperthermia) or other skin formations undergo pathological anatomical examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material, molecular biological testing of discharge from affected skin areas for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, molecular biological testing of discharge from affected skin areas for Streptococcus pyogenes (GAS), molecular biological testing of discharge from affected skin areas for methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus spp., microbiological (culture) scraping of the skin for fungi (yeast, molds, dermatophytes), microbiological (culture) testing of discharge from skin rash elements for susceptibility to antibacterial and antifungal drugs, and microbiological (culture) testing of pressure ulcer aspirates for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia who have pulmonary abnormalities undergo bronchoalveolar lavage, cytologic examination of lavage fluid, microscopic examination of lavage fluid, microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeasts and molds), molecular biological examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis jirovecii, molecular biological examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR, and detection of Chlamydophila pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia undergo testing for Legionella pneumophila antigen in urine in the presence of pneumonia with consolidation foci [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia during the period of neutropenia if systemic antifungal prophylaxis active against molds is not administered; and in the presence of clinical and radiological signs suspicious for invasive aspergillosis, regardless of neutropenia, testing for Aspergillus spp. antibodies in blood (galactomannan) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for monitoring purposes be performed [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: the test is performed at least twice over 5 days. Aspergillus antigen is tested before the administration of systemic antifungal drugs active against mold fungi. The test is included in the diagnostic criteria for invasive aspergillosis. Positive optical density index values for Aspergillus antigen detection are: in blood serum ≥ 0.5, in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid ≥ 1.0, in cerebrospinal fluid ≥ 1.0 [79].
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia with prolonged (more than 7–10 days) persistent febrile fever undergo testing for Candida antigen (mannan) and Candida antibodies (antimannan) in blood serum when multiple lesions in the liver and/or spleen are detected, to rule out hepatosplenic candidiasis or suspected invasive candidiasis [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: the test sample is blood. The test result is considered positive at the following values: Candida antigen (mannan) ≥125 pg/mL; Candida antibodies (antimannan) ≥10 IU/mL. The test is not included in the diagnostic criteria for invasive candidiasis. The test has a high negative predictive value. Positive values do not rule out the presence of invasive candidiasis. Sensitivity and specificity are about 50–60%. Patients with mucosal colonization by Candida spp. may have positive antimannan values.
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia with suspected Cryptococcus infection undergo testing for Cryptococcus neoformans antigen in the blood [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: patients with aplastic anemia are at risk for this infection due to T-cell immunodeficiency. Detection of Cryptococcus spp. antigen in cerebrospinal fluid and Cryptococcus neoformans antigen in blood is performed. The test is included in the diagnostic criteria for invasive cryptococcosis. The study is carried out using a latex agglutination test (qualitative assay).
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia with suspected community-acquired pneumonia undergo determination of IgA, IgM, and IgG antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae in the blood and IgM and IgG antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the blood [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia undergo a repeat chest CT scan in the presence of auscultatory signs of pneumonia; persistent febrile neutropenia lasting 3 days or more, regardless of the physical chest examination findings; or to monitor identified pulmonary changes after 7–14 days, depending on the patient's condition and the diagnosed infection [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: CT is performed in all cases without prior targeted chest radiography. Targeted chest radiography is considered a low-informative examination method in hematological patients; CT is preferred for diagnosing infectious complications.
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia with suspected infectious process undergo repeat abdominal ultrasound, CT, or MRI to clarify the localization of the infectious process based on clinical indications [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: clinical indications include: persistent fever (daily temperature fluctuations from 37 to 39 °C), especially in patients outside of leukopenia (for diagnosing hepatosplenic candidiasis); diagnosed pulmonary aspergillosis or mucormycosis (to rule out dissemination); to monitor previously identified changes in the diagnosis of hepatosplenic candidiasis, the follow-up study is performed no earlier than 1 month after systemic antifungal therapy, outside of leukopenia.
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia with symptoms of central nervous system (CNS) damage or with suspected invasive pulmonary/sinus aspergillosis or mucormycosis undergo repeat brain CT or MRI to rule out infectious brain involvement or dissemination [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia with suspected infective endocarditis undergo echocardiography, including transesophageal echocardiography [12, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: data from this study are particularly important in cases of microbiologically confirmed S. aureus infection and prolonged (more than 10–14 days) persistent hyperthermia, especially in patients outside of leukopenia. Transesophageal echocardiography is prescribed for persistent hyperthermia and negative transthoracic echocardiography results.
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia, in the presence of signs of infection (fever above 38 °C), undergo qualitative detection of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in biological fluids [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: HSV in patients with hematological diseases primarily causes damage to the mucous membranes (mucositis), most frequently HSV type 1.
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia, in the presence of signs of infection (fever above 38 °C), undergo molecular biological blood testing for cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus), quantitative determination of cytomegalovirus DNA by PCR in peripheral and cord blood [12, 13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia, in the presence of signs of infection (fever above 38 °C), undergo molecular biological testing of peripheral blood for human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6) and molecular biological testing of cerebrospinal fluid for human herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6) (if neuroinfection is suspected) [12, 13, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: HHV-6 is divided into type A and type B. Viral reactivation can lead to encephalitis, bone marrow suppression, pneumonia, and cause diarrhea. HHV-6 encephalitis is a rare manifestation of infection; cases have been described following matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with HHV-6 encephalitis, an increased protein level is determined, and pleocytosis occurs in half of the cases. Brain computed tomography may be normal; abnormalities are detected on magnetic resonance imaging.
Diagnosis of other complications
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia with suspected ulcerative gastrointestinal lesions undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy, with biopsy and H. pylori testing if necessary [12, 13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: the formation of gastrointestinal ulcers may manifest as dyspeptic symptoms and abdominal pain, but often runs asymptomatically, presenting with bleeding or perforation.
It is recommended that patients with aplastic anemia with suspected avascular necrosis of the femoral heads undergo standard anteroposterior pelvic radiography and/or joint magnetic resonance imaging (single joint) [12, 13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: A characteristic feature of aseptic necrosis of the femoral head is the presence of a geographic thin line of osteosclerosis, which forms as bone tissue grows from the unaffected area into the osteonecrosis focus. In sequestration, a radiolucent band matching the shape of the focus is detected. X-ray and MRI of bones and joints are also used in planning surgical interventions in late stages of osteonecrosis with the development of deformation of the articular part of the long tubular bone. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry can complement instrumental diagnostics, as it allows for the detection of manifestations of systemic osteoporosis and the condition of bone tissue in the area of installed implants if patients underwent joint arthroplasty.
It is recommended that AA patients with suspected development of aseptic necrosis of the femoral head undergo an investigation of bone metabolism markers (testing blood total calcium levels, urine calcium levels, blood parathyroid hormone levels, blood alkaline phosphatase activity, blood 1,25-OH vitamin D levels, urine deoxypyridinoline levels, and blood osteocalcin levels) [12, 13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: the studied markers can help in determining further supportive treatment tactics and prescribing specific osteoporosis therapy
It is recommended that AA patients with suspected complications associated with the transfusion of donor blood components undergo the following tests [38]:
in suspected transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI): targeted chest X-ray, determination of antileukocyte antibodies, and determination of neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in the blood
in suspected anaphylactic shock: evaluation of serum IgA levels in the recipient
in suspected febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reaction: microbiological (culture) blood test for sterility; determination of antileukocyte antibodies, antiplatelet antibodies, and neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in the blood
in suspected acute or delayed hemolysis: testing for free plasma hemoglobin levels, free and conjugated bilirubin levels in the blood, detection of hemoglobin in the urine, urine hemosiderin determination, direct antiglobulin test (direct Coombs test)
in suspected transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease: complete blood count, general clinical biochemical blood test (ALT, AST, alkaline phosphatase, free and conjugated bilirubin), coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis test), pathomorphological examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material (in the presence of skin erythema), molecular genetic testing of hematopoietic chimerism after unrelated bone marrow transplantation, comprehensive ultrasound examination of the abdominal organs
in suspected post-transfusion purpura: complete blood count, determination of antileukocyte antibodies, antiplatelet antibodies
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
The treatment regimen for adult patients with aplastic anemia is a combined immunosuppressive therapy administered using two main drugs with pronounced immunosuppressive effects: ATG** and #ciclosporin**, and/or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) [12,39–41]
Modern pathogenetic therapy for patients with aplastic anemia may include, in addition to drugs with immunosuppressive effects (ATG**, #ciclosporin**), medications aimed at activating the proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells while simultaneously suppressing the activation of cytotoxic cells. Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated a significant improvement in hematological parameters under the influence of eltrombopag** [41, 42]. According to its mechanism of action, eltrombopag** is a thrombopoietin receptor agonist localized not only on megakaryocytes but also on blood stem cells. Eltrombopag** binds to the transmembrane domain of thrombopoietin receptors without competing with endogenous thrombopoietin, and exhibits immunomodulatory properties through the activation of T-regulatory cells. In addition, eltrombopag** has chelating activity and promotes the removal of toxic iron from liver, heart, and other internal organ cells in iron overload among AA patients dependent on donor red blood cell transfusions [43]. The clinical use of eltrombopag** may be accompanied by a mono-, bi-, or tri-lineage hematological response in patients with refractory aplastic anemia, and its inclusion in combined aplastic anemia treatment regimens reliably increases the rate of achieving a complete response and overall patient survival [41]. The treatment regimen may also include other therapeutic interventions, in particular chelation therapy as well as splenectomy [2, 12, 44]. A tremendous role in the implementation of the treatment program for aplastic anemia patients is played by supportive transfusion therapy: transfusions of donor blood cells (packed red blood cells and platelet concentrates) [12, 17, 23].
HSCT occupies a specific place within the treatment algorithm for AA patients: the presence of an HLA-identical sibling donor, young age, a short transfusion history, and a severe form of the disease are conditions under which HSCT may be considered as the therapy of choice (first-line therapy) [45]. A significant drawback of this method is the limited possibility of application associated with the lack of a related bone marrow donor in the majority of adult patients. Nevertheless, HSCT is currently considered the therapy of choice at the first stage of treatment for young patients with severe aplastic anemia who have an HLA-identical related bone marrow donor [46, 47]. Therefore, HLA typing of patients and the search for a potential related donor must be performed already at the time of AA diagnosis. An absolute indication for HSCT in AA at any stage of the disease is the detection of unfavorable chromosomal aberrations during cytogenetic examination, primarily monosomy 7, indicating progression to MDS or AML.
The improvement of immunosuppressive therapy and the implementation of the program in the early stages of the disease have significantly increased the efficacy of aplastic anemia treatment: the probability of long-term survival in patients with aplastic anemia has increased to 80 - 90% [48, 49]. Treatment efficacy primarily depends on the timely diagnosis of aplastic anemia, the severity of the disease, the patient's age, comorbid conditions, and the feasibility of performing combined immunosuppressive therapy or HSCT already at the initial stages of treatment [12, 17, 50, 51]. The use of glucocorticoids as the primary treatment method in aplastic anemia patients, uncontrolled prolonged #ciclosporin** monotherapy (exceeding 6 months), and the unjustified use of colony-stimulating factors create unfavorable conditions for initiating combined immunosuppressive therapy and impair its efficacy [12, 13].
The analysis of the efficacy of combined immunosuppressive therapy in adult patients with aplastic anemia, presented in systematic reviews of clinical trials from 2010–2019 dedicated to the treatment of patients with aplastic anemia, makes it possible to recommend the developed treatment algorithm as the primary protocol for immunosuppressive therapy in adult patients with aplastic anemia [13, 27, 39, 52, 53].
Program-based combined IST is administered to patients with acquired AA diagnosed on the basis of a comprehensive examination, including peripheral blood analysis, myelogram (sternal puncture), evaluation of bone marrow histological specimens (bilateral iliac crest trephine biopsy), and exclusion of clonal disorders (bone marrow cell cytogenetic testing) in the absence of clinical contraindications.
3.1 Conservative therapy
It is recommended that AA patients younger than 40 years with an HLA-identical related donor undergo bone marrow transplantation (allogeneic HSCT) as first-line therapy to achieve a cure, provided there are no clinical contraindications in either the patient or the donor [45, 122].
GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)
Comments: HLA typing of AA patients and siblings should be performed immediately after establishing the diagnosis. If a related fully compatible donor is available, AA patients should be consulted at a transplant center.
It is recommended to administer a course of equine antithymocyte globulin therapy to patients with AA who do not have a matched related HLA donor [12, 13, 17, 46, 47, 54, 55]
The dose of #equine antithymocyte globulin is 20 mg/kg/day or 40 mg/kg/day (which complies with national and international treatment protocols), with a course duration of 5 or 4 days, respectively, including continuous administration of the daily dose via a 12-hour infusion. #Equine ATG should be prescribed within the framework of Protocol No. 1 (see Appendix A3) [12, 13, 17, 39, 52, 55, 56]
GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)
Comments: Taking into account data from multicenter studies demonstrating a therapeutic effect of #equine ATG superior to that of rabbit ATG, the presented recommendations include only the #equine ATG treatment protocol [57].
Due to the high risk of infectious complications during and after the treatment course, it is recommended to administer the course of #equine ATG in an aseptic single-patient room. The patient is also advised to stay in this room for 21-28 days after the end of the course.
It is recommended that patients undergoing a course of #equine ATG receive supportive therapy at age-appropriate dosages, including prophylaxis of infectious complications in accordance with registered indications (co-trimoxazole [sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim]**, fluconazole**, acyclovir**), and prophylaxis of allergic reactions, including serum sickness [12, 17, 37].
GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)
Comments: prophylaxis of potential complications during the course begins 2 days before the start of therapy and continues for 2 weeks after the end of the course.
It is recommended to administer long-term therapy with #cyclosporine** to patients with AA who lack a matched related HLA donor or are older than 40 years [17, 58, 59].
GCR BLOC 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 1)
Comments: #cyclosporine** is prescribed starting from day 14 of the ATG** course, depending on renal function and effective blood pressure control. The initial dose of the drug is 5 mg/kg per day orally or intravenously. In patients over 60 years of age, the starting dose may be reduced to 3 mg/kg per day. Subsequently, the daily dose is adjusted based on individual pharmacokinetics and individual drug tolerance. The target trough (i.e., drawn before administration) concentration of #cyclosporine** in whole blood is 200-400 ng/mL. If renal toxicity (increased urea and creatinine), uncontrolled arterial hypertension resistant to two drugs, or hepatic toxicity develops, #cyclosporine** is stopped completely, regardless of the dose and blood concentration. After complete resolution of toxicity, #cyclosporine** is resumed at a daily dose equal to ½ of the dose that caused the toxicity. If the plasma level of #cyclosporine** rises above 400 ng/mL, the daily dose is reduced to return to the therapeutic window. The average daily dose of #cyclosporine** throughout the treatment course is determined by tolerability and the achieved concentration level. It is not recommended to increase the dose to the therapeutic level in case of poor tolerability. #Cyclosporine** therapy is continued for 2 years with a slow taper.
It is recommended to use deferasirox** chelation therapy (film-coated tablets) in patients with AA and chronic post-transfusional iron overload at an initial dose of 14 mg/kg/day orally, with a subsequent gradual dose increase up to 28 mg/kg/day in case of inefficacy and absence of signs of toxicity to manage iron overload [17, 44].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: iron overload resulting from multiple blood transfusions is an indication for chelation therapy. If serum ferritin increases >1000 ng/mL, it is recommended to include deferasirox** in the treatment program for patients with refractory AA. Deferasirox** is administered orally in tablets at a maximum daily dose of 28 mg/kg; depending on the serum ferritin level, therapy tolerability, and comorbid pathology, the dose may be decreased or increased by 4–8 mg/kg/day. When used concomitantly with #cyclosporine**, more careful monitoring of renal function is required.
It is recommended to administer eltrombopag** therapy at a dose of up to 150 mg/day from the first day of the course of #equine ATG for 6 months or more until remission is achieved in patients with newly diagnosed severe AA [17, 60, 125].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: eltrombopag** therapy can be administered in the first line of therapy or in the absence of a response to a course of #equine ATG combined with #cyclosporine** when allo-HSCT is not feasible.
It is recommended to administer eltrombopag** therapy at a dose of 50 to 150 mg/day for 6 months or more upon achieving a hematological response in patients with newly diagnosed severe AA or refractory AA [60].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Eltrombopag** therapy is also possible in the presence of either single-line cytopenia (thrombocytopenia) or pancytopenia to improve the achieved treatment outcomes.
It is recommended that refractory patients undergo a repeat course of therapy with #equine ATG in 3-6 months if no efficacy is observed after the 1st course. In some cases, the possibility of combined therapy with eltrombopag** in the first line may be discussed [54, 61].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: currently, #equine ATG is also the therapy of choice for a repeat course.
Patients with confirmed refractoriness to the 1st course of ATG** therapy are recommended a consultation at a transplantation center to assess the feasibility of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell or bone marrow transplantation from an unrelated or haploidentical donor [62, 122, 123].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended for patients with cyclosporine-dependent relapse (relapse developing during a gradual dose reduction or immediately after complete cessation) to resume #cyclosporine** therapy at a dose of 5 mg/kg/day in the absence of transfusion dependency [12, 54, 58, 59].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: in the absence of a response after 2-3 months, discuss the option of administering a course of #ATG**.
It is recommended that patients with a relapse of AA undergo a repeated course of horse #ATG at the previous dosing regimen [2, 54].
GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)
It is not recommended to administer glucocorticoid monotherapy to patients with AA [12, 13].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: glucocorticoid monotherapy is not pathogenetic for AA.
It is recommended for all patients with AA, when indicated, to undergo replacement transfusion therapy with blood components to manage anemia and hemorrhagic syndromes (see Section 7.3 of these guidelines) [12, 13, 23].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: red blood cell suspension and platelet concentrate are used; the algorithm for their use is determined by the severity of the disease, i.e., the severity of the anemia and hemorrhagic syndromes and the stage of therapy.
To manage the anemic syndrome in AA, leukocyte- and platelet-depleted red blood cell mass should be used, taking into account the erythrocyte phenotype of the donor and recipient. For a single transfusion of donor platelets, at least 6–10 doses (one dose being 0.5-0.7×1011) of platelet concentrate obtained from a single donor are used; transfusions are performed with a frequency ranging from once a week to once a day depending on the following factors: administration of #ATG** therapy (on administration days), presence of bleeding, treatment with antithrombotic agents, presence of active infection, and adequacy of the transfusion increment. The use of platelet concentrates prepared by plateletpheresis can significantly reduce the number of platelet donors per recipient and lower the risk of patient alloimmunization. In severe hemorrhagic syndrome characterized by uterine or gastrointestinal bleeding accompanied by the development of DIC syndrome, fresh frozen plasma must be used.
The tactics of blood component use depend on the stage of IST.
During the preparation for the course of #equine ATG treatment, it is necessary to manage the hemorrhagic syndrome, if present, and increase the platelet count above 30.0 × 109/L, and the hemoglobin level above 90.0 g/L (bleeding stops better when hemoglobin is good!!!). The frequency of transfusions is determined individually.
The tactics of blood transfusion therapy during the induction of remission on #cyclosporine** are developed individually and depend on the minimum optimal hemoglobin and platelet levels for a given patient.
The tactics of replacement transfusion therapy with blood components (donor red blood cells and platelets) in refractory AA are determined by the degree of the patient's transfusion dependency.
3.2 Surgical Treatment
It is recommended to perform laparoscopic splenectomy in refractory patients after ineffective IST combined with eltrombopag** in the absence of the possibility of alternative donor bone marrow transplantation, as well as in cases where differential diagnosis is necessary (see Appendix 3.8) [12].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: in cases of ATG** intolerance, confirmed refractory AA, lack of other therapeutic options, and unavailability of bone marrow transplantation, splenectomy may be included in the treatment program.
It is not recommended to perform laparoscopic splenectomy in patients with identified karyotype abnormalities [12].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: high rate of transformation to MDS/AML.
3.3 Supportive and concomitant therapy
It is recommended for all AA patients undergoing a course of ATG** therapy to receive prophylaxis for gastric and duodenal ulcers [63, 121].
GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)
Comments: gastric or duodenal ulcer is one of the serious side effects of GCS therapy (included in the prevention of ATG** complications). The mechanism of the ulcerogenic action of GCS involves increased hydrochloric acid secretion in the stomach, changes in the qualitative composition of mucus, and inhibition of surface epithelium regeneration. Due to their ulcerogenic potential, antisecretory therapy is necessary when using GCS to prevent steroid ulcers.
According to a meta-analysis of 300 studies [64], gastric and duodenal ulcers scar in almost all cases if the intragastric pH is maintained above 3 for 18 hours per day. Taking this rule into account, antacids, H2-histamine receptor blockers, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can currently be considered as anti-ulcer therapy. According to one of the latest meta-analyses, the use of PPIs or H2-histamine receptor blockers significantly more effectively achieves scarring of the ulcer defect and reduces the risk of recurrent bleeding. Only drugs from these two groups can achieve and maintain the necessary gastric pH environment required for the healing of gastroduodenal ulcers.
Currently, two classes of drugs are used for antisecretory purposes to prevent gastric and duodenal ulcers, including during glucocorticoid therapy: proton pump inhibitors and H2-histamine receptor blockers [65, 66].
It is recommended for all AA patients undergoing a course of ATG** therapy to receive bacterial infection prophylaxis [12, 67, 121].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: before prescribing fluoroquinolones for prophylaxis, a rectal swab must be examined, and the test is repeated every 7 days. Prophylaxis is discontinued when systemic antibacterial drugs are prescribed for fever during neutropenia. Fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin** 0.5 g orally twice a day, are used for prophylaxis.
It is recommended for all AA patients undergoing a course of ATG** therapy to receive pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis [12, 17, 67].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: the drug of choice for pneumocystis pneumonia prophylaxis is #co-trimoxazole [sulfamethoxazole+trimethoprim]**, prescribed at 480 mg daily. Patients infected with Pneumocystis jirovecii must not share a room with other immunocompromised patients.
It is recommended for all AA patients undergoing a course of ATG** therapy to receive primary antifungal prophylaxis with systemic antifungal drugs [12, 17, 67].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: systemic antifungal drugs are prescribed 2 days before the administration of ATG** (on the day of #prednisolone** prescription).
It is recommended for all AA patients with a history of invasive mycosis caused by molds (invasive aspergillosis, mucormycosis, etc.), as well as disseminated invasive candidiasis (organ involvement), to receive secondary antifungal prophylaxis [12, 17, 67].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: for secondary prophylaxis, the drug that achieved cure of the invasive mycosis is prescribed starting from the 1st day of the post-course period or when the granulocyte count is ≤0.5 × 109/L, as well as throughout the entire period of immunosuppressant use.
It is recommended for all AA patients to receive viral infection prophylaxis during the ATG** course [12, 67].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: antiviral prophylaxis is used for 3–5 weeks. Switching from oral to intravenous formulation is performed in patients with mucositis.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
There are no special rehabilitation methods for AA. Rehabilitation of patients with AA should be comprehensive, covering medical, social, and psychological aspects of the patient's adaptation to normal life. The scope of medical rehabilitation is developed individually for each patient by a rehabilitation specialist with the participation of a hematologist. In addition, the rehabilitation program must take into account the patient's social and psychological problems and involve social workers and medical psychologists. Rehabilitation for complications arising during the course of the disease and treatment is carried out within the framework of the respective nosologies.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
There are currently no methods for the prevention of AA.
It is recommended for all AA patients to have follow-up visits (examination, consultation) with a hematologist (schedule determined individually) for early diagnosis of relapses and timely initiation of treatment [12].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comments: the frequency of monitoring AA patients after completion of treatment is not standardized. During the first year after completion of treatment, the patient should be monitored by a hematologist at least once every 3 months. Thereafter, the frequency of monitoring is established by the hematologist individually, depending on the patient's general condition and well-being, complications of the therapy, and the achieved response to therapy, but should not be less than once a year. During follow-up, in addition to examining the patient and taking medical history and complaints, a complete blood count with differential white blood cell count must be performed. Other diagnostic methods may be used at the discretion of the hematologist.
It should be noted that the patient may have atypical disease manifestations, as well as a combination of a specific disease with other pathologies, which may dictate changes by the attending physician in the algorithm for choosing the optimal diagnostic and treatment tactics.
6. Organization of Medical Care
Indications for elective hospitalization:
1) Administration of a course of ATG** therapy;
2) Bone marrow transplantation;
3) Prophylactic transfusions of donor blood components
4) Patient examination, including biopsies and invasive interventions, when it cannot be performed on an outpatient basis
5) Elective surgical intervention
Indications for emergency hospitalization:
1) Development of infectious and/or hemorrhagic complications;
2) Severe thrombocytopenia and/or anemia requiring emergency replacement transfusions;
Indications for discharging the patient from the hospital:
1) Following the completed ATG** course or bone marrow transplantation — outpatient follow-up;
2) Full management of hemorrhagic and/or infectious complications.
3) Completed set of diagnostic measures
7. Additional Information
none
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria | Performance evaluation |
|---|---|---|
1. | A medical history, complaints, and physical examination were performed for the patient with suspected AA | Yes/No |
2. | The following tests were performed for verification of the diagnosis and assessment of disease dynamics in a patient with suspected or established AA once a week until response is achieved, then once a month, and also upon the development of hemorrhagic syndrome: complete (clinical) blood count with differential, blood reticulocyte count, blood platelet count | Yes/No |
3. | The following were performed for a patient upon AA diagnosis, as well as during ATG** therapy every 6–12 months until response is achieved: obtaining a cytological preparation via puncture (sternal puncture) and cytological examination of a bone marrow smear (myelogram) to assess the cellular composition of bone marrow hematopoiesis, bone marrow histological preparation, and pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material | Yes/No |
4. | Standard cytogenetic testing (karyotype) of BM cells and molecular cytogenetic testing (FISH method) for one chromosome pair (FISH testing for monosomy 7) were performed in a patient upon AA diagnosis for differential diagnosis with MDS | Performance evaluation |
5. | Molecular genetic histocompatibility testing (high-resolution HLA using sequencing) to select a related bone marrow donor and consultation at a transplant center to choose the treatment method were performed in a patient upon AA diagnosis, confirmation of AA refractoriness, and in their siblings | Yes/No |
7. | In a patient with established aplastic anemia (AA), peripheral blood cell immunophenotyping was performed to diagnose paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria using an expanded marker panel, including FLAER (fluorescein-labeled aerolysin) to detect the PNH clone; blood lactate dehydrogenase activity was determined to assess clinical and laboratory signs of hemolysis. | Yes/No |
References
Show references
Isidori A. et al. Iron toxicity - Its effect on the bone marrow. // Blood Rev. England, 2018. Vol. 32, № 6. P. 473–479.
Marsh J.C.W., Kulasekararaj A.G. Management of the refractory aplastic anemia patient: what are the options? // Blood. 2013. Vol. 122, № 22. P. 3561–3567.
Frickhofen N. et al. Antithymocyte globulin with or without cyclosporin A: 11-Year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing treatments of aplastic anemia // Blood. 2003. Vol. 101, № 4. P. 1236–1242.
Kulasekararaj A.G. et al. Somatic mutations identify a subgroup of aplastic anemia patients who progress to myelodysplastic syndrome // Blood. 2014. Vol. 124, № 17. P. 2698–2704.
Afable M.G., Tiu R. V, Maciejewski J.P. Clonal Evolution in Aplastic Anemia // Hematology. 2011. № 1. P. 90–95.
Pu J.J. et al. Natural history of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clones in patients presenting as aplastic anemia // Eur. J. Haematol. 2011. Vol. 87, № 1. P. 37–45.
Socié G. et al. Paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria: long-term follow-up and prognostic factors // Lancet. 1996. Vol. 348, № 9027. P. 573–577.
Kulagin A. et al. Prognostic value of paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria clone presence in aplastic anaemia patients treated with combined immunosuppression: Results of two-centre prospective study // Br. J. Haematol. 2014. Vol. 164, № 4. P. 546–554.
Li Y. et al. Long-term follow-up of clonal evolutions in 802 aplastic anemia patients: A single-center experience // Ann. Hematol. 2011. Vol. 90, № 5. P. 529–537.
Kulagin AD, Lisukov IA, Ptushkin VV, Shilova ER, Tsvetayeva NV, ME A. National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria // Oncohematology. 2014. Vol. 2. P. 20–28.
Kaufman D.W. et al. Relative incidence of agranulocytosis and aplastic anemia // Am. J. Hematol. 2006.
Mikhailova EA, Fidarova ZT, et al. Protocol for combined immunosuppressive therapy in patients with aplastic anemia (2024 edition) // Diagnostic Algorithms and Treatment Protocols for Hematopoietic System Diseases: in two volumes. Ed. by E.N. Parovichnikova. Vol. 1.- M.: Praktika, 2024. pp. 271-287.
Killick S.B. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult aplastic anaemia. // Br. J. Haematol. England, 2016. Vol. 172, № 2. P. 187–207.
Soulier J. Fanconi anemia. // Hematology Am. Soc. Hematol. Educ. Program. 2011. Vol. 2011. P. 492–497.
Camitta B.M. What is the definition of cure for aplastic anemia? // Acta Haematologica. 2000. Vol. 103, № 1. P. 16–18.
Dokal I. Dyskeratosis congenita. // Hematology. 2011. Vol. 2011. P. 480–486.
Kulasekararaj A, Cavenagh J,Dokal I, Foukaneli T, Gandhi S, Garg M, et al.Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adultaplastic anaemia: A British Society for HaematologyGuideline. Br J Haematol. 2024;204(3):784–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.19236
Peslak S.A., Olson T., Babushok D. V. Diagnosis and Treatment of Aplastic Anemia // Current Treatment Options in Oncology. Springer New York LLC, 2017. Vol. 18, № 12.
Panteleev M.A. et al. Practical Coagulology. 2010. 192 p.
Hayward C.P.M. How I investigate for bleeding disorders // International Journal of Laboratory Hematology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2018. Vol. 40. P. 6–14.
Nielsen P. et al. Iron Stores in Patients with Myelodysplasia and Aplastic Anemia. // Blood. 2006. Vol. 108, № 11. P. 3726–3726.
DeZern A.E., Churpek J.E. Approach to the diagnosis of aplastic anemia // Blood Adv. American Society of Hematology, 2021. Vol. 5, № 12. P. 2660–2671.
Kelsey P. et al. Guidelines for the use of platelet transfusions // Br. J. Haematol. 2003. Vol. 122, № 1. P. 10–23.
Maciejewski J.P., Mufti G.J. Whole genome scanning as a cytogenetic tool in hematologic malignancies // Blood. 2008. Vol. 112, № 4. P. 965–974.
Maciejewski J.P. et al. Distinct clinical outcomes for cytogenetic abnormalities evolving from aplastic anemia // Blood. 2002. Vol. 99, № 9. P. 3129–3135.
Gupta V. et al. Clinical relevance of cytogenetic abnormalities at diagnosis of acquired aplastic anaemia in adults // Br. J. Haematol. 2006. Vol. 134, № 1. P. 95–99.
Miano M., Dufour C. The diagnosis and treatment of aplastic anemia: a review // Int. J. Hematol. 2015. Vol. 101, № 6. P. 527–535.
Dumitriu B. et al. Red cells, iron, and erythropoiesis: Telomere attrition and candidate gene mutations preceding monosomy 7 in aplastic anemia // Blood. 2015. Vol. 125, № 4. P. 706–709.
Jerez A. et al. STAT3 mutations indicate the presence of subclinical T-cell clones in a subset of aplastic anemia and myelodysplastic syndrome patients // Blood. 2013. Vol. 122, № 14. P. 2453–2459.
Du Y. et al. Observational Monitoring of Patients with Aplastic Anemia and Low/Intermediate-1 Risk of Myelodysplastic Syndromes Complicated with Iron Overload. // Acta Haematol. Switzerland, 2017. Vol. 138, № 2. P. 119–128.
Borowitz M.J. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and monitoring of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria and related disorders by flow cytometry // Cytom. Part B - Clin. Cytom. Wiley-Liss Inc., 2010. Vol. 78, № 4. P. 211–230.
Ogawa S. Clonal hematopoiesis in acquired aplastic anemia // Blood. 2016. Vol. 128, № 3. P. 337–347.
Parker C.J. Update on the diagnosis and management of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria. // Hematology. United States, 2016. Vol. 2016, № 1. P. 208–216.
Brown K.E. et al. Hepatitis-associated aplastic anemia // N. Engl. J. Med. 1997. Vol. 336, № 15. P. 1059–1064.
Karagulyan SR, et al. Technical complexities of splenectomy in hematological diseases // Clinical Oncohematology. 2017. Vol. 10, № 1. P. 101–107.
Alter B.P. Diagnosis, genetics, and management of inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. // Hematology. 2007. P. 29–39.
Mikhailova EA, et al. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of aplastic anemia (2019 edition) // Hematology and Transfusiology. 2020. Vol. 65, № 2. P. 208–226.
Smith L.G. Reactions to blood transfusions // Am. J. Nurs. 1984. Vol. 84, № 9. P. 1096–1101.
Scheinberg P. Aplastic anemia: therapeutic updates in immunosuppression and transplantation. // Hematology. 2012. P. 292–300.
Townsley D.M., Winkler T. Nontransplant therapy for bone marrow failure // ASH Educ. Progr. B. 2016. Vol. 2016, № 1. P. 83–89.
Desmond R. et al. Eltrombopag restores trilineage hematopoiesis in refractory severe aplastic anemia that can be sustained on discontinuation of drug // Blood. 2014. Vol. 123, № 12. P. 1818–1825.
Desmond R. et al. Eltrombopag in Aplastic Anemia // Seminars in Hematology. 2015. Vol. 52, № 1. P. 31–37.
Fattizzo B. et al. Iron mobilization in a real life cohort of aplastic anemia patients treated with eltrombopag. // American journal of hematology. United States, 2019.
Lee J.W. et al. Iron chelation therapy with deferasirox in patients with aplastic anemia: A subgroup analysis of 116 patients from the EPIC trial // Blood. 2010. Vol. 116, № 14. P. 2448–2454.
Bacigalupo A. et al. Treatment of acquired severe aplastic anemia: Bone marrow transplantation compared with immunosuppressive therapy - The European Group for blood and marrow transplantation experience // Semin. Hematol. 2000. Vol. 37, № 1. P. 69–80.
Bacigalupo A. et al. Long‐term follow‐up of severe aplastic anaemia patients treated with antithymocyte globulin // Br. J. Haematol. 1989. Vol. 73, № 1. P. 121–126.
Rosenfeld S. et al. Antithymocyte Globulin and Cyclosporine for Severe Aplastic Anemia: Association between Hematologic Response and Long-term Outcome // J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2003. Vol. 289, № 9. P. 1130–1135.
Mikhailova EA, Fidarova ZT, Ustinova EN, Troitskaya VV, Galtseva IV, Shitareva IV, et al. Combined immunosuppressive therapy in patients with aplastic anemia: efficacy of repeated courses. // Hematology and Transfusiology. 2014. Vol. 59, № 4. P. 11–18.
Scheinberg P. et al. Predicting response to immunosuppressive therapy and survival in severe aplastic anaemia // Br. J. Haematol. 2009. Vol. 144, № 2. P. 206–216.
Marchiò C., Dowsett M., Reis-Filho J.S. Revisiting the technical validation of tumour biomarker assays: How to open a Pandora’s box // BMC Med. 2011. Vol. 9.
Bacigalupo A. et al. Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) versus immunosuppression for the treatment of severe aplastic anaemia (SAA): A report of the EBMT SAA Working Party // Br. J. Haematol. 1988. Vol. 70, № 2. P. 177–182.
Scheinberg P. et al. Horse antithymocyte globulin as salvage therapy after rabbit antithymocyte globulin for severe aplastic anemia // Am. J. Hematol. 2014. Vol. 89, № 5. P. 467–469.
Peffault de Latour R. et al. Nationwide survey on the use of horse antithymocyte globulins (ATGAM) in patients with acquired aplastic anemia: A report on behalf of the French Reference Center for Aplastic Anemia. // Am. J. Hematol. United States, 2018. Vol. 93, № 5. P. 635–642.
Mikhailova EA, et al. Combined immunosuppressive therapy in patients with aplastic anemia: repeated courses of antithymocyte globulin // HEMATOLOGY AND TRANSFUSIOLOGY. 2014. Vol. 59, № 4. P. 11–18.
Bacigalupo A. How I treat acquired aplastic anemia // Blood. 2017. Vol. 129, № 11. P. 1428–1436.
Scheinberg P., Young N.S. How I treat acquired aplastic anemia. // Blood. 2012. Vol. 120, № 6. P. 1185–1196.
Scheinberg P. et al. Horse versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin in acquired aplastic anemia // N. Engl. J. Med. 2011. Vol. 365, № 5. P. 430–438.
Gafter-Gvili A. et al. ATG plus cyclosporine reduces all-cause mortality in patients with severe aplastic anemia--systematic review and meta-analysis // Acta Haematol. Acta Haematol, 2008. Vol. 120, № 4. P. 237–243.
Yamazaki H. et al. Cyclosporine Therapy for Acquired Aplastic Anemia: Predictive Factors for the Response and Long-term Prognosis // Int. J. Hematol. 2007 853. Springer, 2007. Vol. 85, № 3. P. 186–190.
Hong Y. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Eltrombopag for Aplastic Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. // Clin. Drug Investig. 2019. Vol. 39, № 2. P. 141–156.
Olnes M.J. et al. Eltrombopag and improved hematopoiesis in refractory aplastic anemia. // N. Engl. J. Med. 2012. Vol. 367, № 1. P. 11–19.
Dietz A.C. et al. Evolving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Strategies in Severe Aplastic Anemia // Curr. Opin. Pediatr. NIH Public Access, 2016. Vol. 28, № 1. P. 3.
Park Y.B. et al. Incidence and etiology of overt gastrointestinal bleeding in adult patients with aplastic anemia // Dig. Dis. Sci. Dig Dis Sci, 2010. Vol. 55, № 1. P. 73–81.
Burget D.W., Chiverton S.G., Hunt R.H. Is there an optimal degree of acid suppression for healing of duodenal ulcers? A model of the relationship between ulcer healing and acid suppression // Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology, 1990. Vol. 99, № 2. P. 345–351.
Ivashkin V.T. et al. [Diagnostics and treatment of peptic ulcer disease in adults (Clinical guidelines of the Russian Gastroenterological Association, Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons, and Russian Endoscopic Society)]. Rossiyskiy zhurnal gastroenterologii, gepatologii, koloproktologii. 2020;30(1):49–70. (In Russ.)
Scally B. et al. Effects of gastroprotectant drugs for the prevention and treatment of peptic ulcer disease and its complications: a meta-analysis of randomised trials // Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Elsevier Ltd, 2018. Vol. 3, № 4. P. 231–241.
Höchsmann B. et al. Supportive care in severe and very severe aplastic anemia // Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2013. Vol. 48, № 2. P. 168–173.
Fan E., Brodie D., Slutsky A.S. Acute respiratory distress syndrome advances in diagnosis and treatment // JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. American Medical Association, 2018. Vol. 319, № 7. P. 698–710.
Young P. et al. Effect of a buffered crystalloid solution vs saline on acute kidney injury among patients in the intensive care unit: The SPLIT randomized clinical trial // JAMA - J. Am. Med. Assoc. American Medical Association, 2015. Vol. 314, № 16. P. 1701–1710.
Hoorn E.J. Intravenous fluids: balancing solutions // Journal of Nephrology. Springer New York LLC, 2017. Vol. 30, № 4. P. 485–492.
Arends J. et al. ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients // Clin. Nutr. Churchill Livingstone, 2017. Vol. 36, № 1. P. 11–48.
Shikhmirzaev T.A. et al. [Pharmacoprophylaxis of transfusion reactions]. Vestnik Natsionalnogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo Tsentra im. N. I. Pirogova. 2018;13(2):95–99. (In Russ.)
Axelrod B.A. et al. Clinical use of red blood cell components of donor blood // Hematology and Transfusiology. 2018. Vol. 63, № 4. P. 372–435.
Krivolapov Yu.A. [Technical aspects of bone marrow trephine biopsy]. Klinicheskaya onkogematologiya. 2014;7(3):290–295. (In Russ.)
Wang J. et al. Diagnostic utility of bilateral bone marrow examination: Significance of morphologic and ancillary technique study in malignancy // Cancer. Cancer, 2002. Vol. 94, № 5. P. 1522–1531.
SPIRIN M., GALSTYAN G., DROKOV M. Central venous access in lymphoma patients (pts) with superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS) // INTENSIVE CARE Med. Exp. 2019. Vol. 7, № Suppl. 3:001341. P. 388–389.
Pluschnig U. et al. Extravasation emergencies: state-of-the-art management and progress in clinical research. // Memo. Springer, 2016. Vol. 9, № 4. P. 226–230.
Zeidler K. et al. Optimal preprocedural platelet transfusion threshold for central venous catheter insertions in patients with thrombocytopenia. // Transfusion. 2011. Vol. 51, № 11. P. 2269–2276.
Zerati A.E. et al. Totally implantable venous catheters : history , implantation technique and complications. // J Vasc Bras. 2017. Vol. 16, № 2. P. 128–139.
Gow K.W., Tapper D., Hickman R.O. Between the lines: The 50th anniversary of long-term central venous catheters // Am. J. Surg. Elsevier Ltd, 2017. Vol. 213, № 5. P. 837–848.
Yeral M. et al. Tunnelled central venous catheter-related problems in the early phase of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation and effects on transplant outcome. // Turkish J. Haematol. Off. J. Turkish Soc. Haematol. Galenos Yayinevi, 2015. Vol. 32, № 1. P. 51–57.
Maki D.G., Kluger D.M., Crnich C.J. The Risk of Bloodstream Infection in Adults With Different Intravascular Devices: A Systematic Review of 200 Published Prospective Studies // Mayo Clin. Proc. Elsevier, 2006. Vol. 81, № 9. P. 1159–1171.
Hamilton H. Central Venous Catheters / ed. Bodenham A.R. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
Biffi R. Introduction and Overview of PICC History // Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters. Milano: Springer Milan, 2014. P. 1–6.
Linenberger M.L. Catheter-related thrombosis: risks, diagnosis, and management. // J. Natl. Compr. Canc. Netw. 2006. Vol. 4, № 9. P. 889–901.
Lee A.Y.Y., Kamphuisen P.W. Epidemiology and prevention of catheter-related thrombosis in patients with cancer // J. Thromb. Haemost. 2012. № 10. P. 1491–1499.
Tsepenshchikov L., Lyadov V.K. [Peripherally inserted central venous catheter: literature review]. Klinicheskaya onkogematologiya. 2014;7(2):220–228. (In Russ.)
Linder L.E. et al. Material thrombogenicity in central venous catheterization: a comparison between soft, antebrachial catheters of silicone elastomer and polyurethane. // JPEN. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 1984. Vol. 8, № 4. P. 399–406.
Watters V.A., Grant J.P. Use of Electrocardiogram to Position Right Atrial Catheters During Surgery // Ann. Surg. Vol. 225, № 2. P. 165–171.
Taal M.W., Chesterton L.J., McIntyre C.W. Venography at insertion of tunnelled internal jugular vein dialysis catheters reveals significant occult stenosis // Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. Oxford University Press, 2004. Vol. 19, № 6. P. 1542–1545.
Lobato E.B. et al. Cross-sectional area of the right and left internal jugular veins. // J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 1999. Vol. 13, № 2. P. 136–138.
Chervontseva A.M. [Vascular endothelial injury during the treatment of acute myeloid leukemias]. 2008. (In Russ.)
Bagirova N.S. [Intravascular device-related infections: terminology, diagnostics, prevention, and therapy]. Zlokachestvennye opukholi. 2014;(3):164–171. (In Russ.)
Bannon M.P., Heller S.F., Rivera M. Anatomic considerations for central venous cannulation. // Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy. Dove Press, 2011. Vol. 4. P. 27–39.
Milling T.J. et al. Randomized, controlled clinical trial of point-of-care limited ultrasonography assistance of central venous cannulation: The Third Sonography Outcomes Assessment Program (SOAP-3) Trial* // Crit. Care Med. 2005. Vol. 33, № 8. P. 1764–1769.
Zozulya N.I., Kumskova M.A. Protocol for the diagnosis and treatment of hemophilia. // Diagnostic Algorithms and Treatment Protocols for Blood System Diseases. Volume 1. Praktika / ed. by V.G. Savchenko. Moscow, 2018. P. 333–358.
Galstyan G.M. HEMOSTASIS DISORDERS CAUSED BY VITAMIN K-DEPENDENT COAGULATION FACTOR DEFICIENCY — PATHOGENESIS, CORRECTION METHODS, AND TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS. // Hematology and Transfusiology. 2012; 27(2): 7–21.
Habermalz B. et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy: The clinical practice guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) // Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. Surg Endosc, 2008. Vol. 22, № 4. P. 821–848.
Vorobyev A.I. et al. [Critical conditions in hemoblastoses (typical forms and survival in the intensive care unit)]. Terapevticheskiy arkhiv. 1993;65(7):3–6. (In Russ.)
Galstyan G.M., Gorodetskiy V.M. [Experience of the intensive care unit of the National Research Center for Hematology of the Russian Ministry of Health]. Klinicheskaya onkogematologiya. 2011;4(1):75–78. (In Russ.)
Lamia B. et al. Changes in severity and organ failure scores as prognostic factors in onco-hematological malignancy patients admitted to the ICU // Intensive Care Med. Intensive Care Med, 2006. Vol. 32, № 10. P. 1560–1568.
Evison J.M. et al. Intensive care unit admission in patients with haematological disease: incidence, outcome and prognostic factors. 2001.
Silfvast T. et al. Multiple organ failure and outcome of critically ill patients with haematological malignancy // Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2003. Vol. 47, № 3. P. 301–306.
Benoit D.D. et al. Outcome and early prognostic indicators in patients with a hematologic malignancy admitted to the intensive care unit for a life-threatening complication // Crit. Care Med. Crit Care Med, 2003. Vol. 31, № 1. P. 104–112.
Schellongowski P. et al. Prognostic factors for intensive care unit admission, intensive care outcome, and post-intensive care survival in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a single center experience // Haematologica. 2011. Vol. 96, № 2. P. 231–237.
Medić M.G. et al. Hematologic malignancies in the medical intensive care unit – Outcomes and prognostic factors // Hematology. Maney Publishing, 2015. Vol. 20, № 5. P. 247–253.
Jackson K. et al. Outcomes and prognostic factors for patients with acute myeloid leukemia admitted to the intensive care unit // Leuk. Lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma, 2013. Vol. 55, № April. P. 1–8.
Ahmed T. et al. Outcomes and changes in code status of patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing induction chemotherapy who were transferred to the intensive care unit // Leuk. Res. Elsevier Ltd, 2017. Vol. 62. P. 51–55.
Protocols for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Ed. by V.G. Savchenko. Moscow: Praktika, 2020. 320 p.
Willis L. et al. Recent developments in drug therapy for aplastic anemia // Ann. Pharmacother. Ann Pharmacother, 2014. Vol. 48, № 11. P. 1469–1478.
Bonfim C. et al. Bone Marrow Transplantation (BMT) for heavily Transfused Patients (pts) with Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA): 147 pts treated at the same institution with Busulfan (BU) + Cyclophosphamide (CY) // Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. Elsevier, 2006. Vol. 12, № 2. P. 28.
de Latour R.P., Risitano A.M., Dufour C. Severe Aplastic Anemia and PNH // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 579–587.
Michonneau D., Socié G. GVHD Prophylaxis (Immunosuppression) // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 177–183.
Nagler A., Shimoni A. Conditioning // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 7th ed. / ed. Carreras E. et al. Springer, 2019. P. 99–109.
Baron F. et al. Anti-thymocyte globulin as graft-versus-host disease prevention in the setting of allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: a review from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation // Haematologica. 2017. Vol. 102, № 2.
Basak G.W. Gastrointestinal Complications // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 2019. P. 381–386.
Chaturvedi S., George B., Savani B.N. Bleeding and Thrombotic Complications // The EBMT Handbook: Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies. 2019. P. 301–306.
Oken M.M. et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group // Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 1982. Vol. 5, № 6. P. 649–655.
Gratwohl A. The EBMT risk score // Bone Marrow Transplantation. Nature Publishing Group, 2012. Vol. 47, № 6. P. 749–756.
Sorror M.L. et al. Prospective Validation of the Predictive Power of the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Study // Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. Elsevier Inc., 2015. Vol. 21, № 8. P. 1479–1487.
Supportive care in the treatment of blood system disorders. Practical guideline / ed. by E.N. Parovichnikova, G.M. Galstyan. Moscow: Praktika, 2024; 512 p.
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. A Practical Guide. Ed. by E.N. Parovichnikova, T.V. Gaponova, M.Yu. Drokov. - M.: Praktika, 2024. - 640 p.
Drokov M.Yu, Moiseev IS, Oleinik Yu.A. Efficacy and safety of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell and bone marrow transplantation in adult patients with hematological diseases: expert survey of transplantation centers of the Russian Federation, CTT JOURNAL, March (13) c49-92
Scheinberg P, Rios O, Scheinberg P, Weinstein B, Wu CO, YoungNS. Prolonged cyclosporine administration after antithymocyteglobulin delays but does not prevent relapse in severe aplastic anemia. Am J Hematol. 2014;89(6):571–4.
Peffault de Latour R, Kulasekararaj A, Iacobelli S, Terwel SR, CookR, Griffin M, et al. Eltrombopag added to immunosuppression insevere aplastic anemia. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(1):11–23
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Parovichnikova E.N., MD, DSc, General Director, National Research Center for Hematology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow; Association for the Promotion of Development of Hematology, Transfusiology and Bone Marrow Transplantation «National Hematological Society».
Mikhailova E.A., MD, DSc, Professor, Leading Researcher, Department of Chemotherapy for Hemoblastoses and Hematopoietic Depressions, National Research Center for Hematology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow; Association for the Promotion of Development of Hematology, Transfusiology and Bone Marrow Transplantation «National Hematological Society».
Fidarova Z.T., PhD, Head of the Department of Chemotherapy for Hemoblastoses and Hematopoietic Depressions with Bone Marrow and Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Unit, National Research Center for Hematology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow; Association for the Promotion of Development of Hematology, Transfusiology and Bone Marrow Transplantation «National Hematological Society».
Troitskaya V.V., MD, DSc, First Deputy General Director, National Research Center for Hematology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow; Association for the Promotion of Development of Hematology, Transfusiology and Bone Marrow Transplantation «National Hematological Society».
Gaponova T.V., MD, DSc, First Deputy General Director, National Research Center for Hematology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow; Association for the Promotion of Development of Hematology, Transfusiology and Bone Marrow Transplantation «National Hematological Society».
Klyasova G.A., MD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Research and Clinical Laboratory of Microbiology, National Research Center for Hematology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow; Association for the Promotion of Development of Hematology, Transfusiology and Bone Marrow Transplantation «National Hematological Society».
Kulagin A.D., MD, DSc, Prof., Director of the RM Gorbacheva Research Institute of Pediatric Hematology and Transplantology, Saint Petersburg; Association for the Promotion of Development of Hematology, Transfusiology and Bone Marrow Transplantation «National Hematological Society».
Lapin V.A., Hematologist, Yaroslavl Regional Clinical Hospital, Yaroslavl, Chief Hematologist of Yaroslavl Oblast; Association for the Promotion of Development of Hematology, Transfusiology and Bone Marrow Transplantation «National Hematological Society».
Samoilova O.S., PhD, Head of the Hematology Department, Nizhny Novgorod Oblast Clinical Hospital named after N.A. Semashko, Nizhny Novgorod; Association for the Promotion of Development of Hematology, Transfusiology and Bone Marrow Transplantation «National Hematological Society».
Voitsekhovsky V.V., MD, DSc, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Hospital Therapy with a Course of Pharmacology, Amur State Medical Academy, Blagoveshchensk, Amur Oblast.
Conflict of interest: the authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience of the clinical guidelines:
Hematologists;
Oncologists;
General practitioners.
Methods used to assess the quality and strength of evidence:
Table A2.1. Scale for assessing the levels of evidence certainty (LEC) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies controlled with a reference method or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies controlled with a reference method or individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design, excluding RCTs, using meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table A2.2. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definitions |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of randomized RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Selected randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except for randomized controlled trials utilizing meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table A2.3. Grades of Recommendation (GoR) scale for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Description of the recommendation validation method:
The preliminary version of these guidelines was reviewed by independent experts, who were asked to comment primarily on how accessible the interpretation of the evidence underlying the recommendations is for understanding.
Feedback was received from primary care physicians and general practitioners regarding the clarity of the guidelines and their assessment of the importance of the guidelines as a working tool in daily practice.
The draft version was also sent to a non-medically trained reviewer to obtain comments from a patient perspective.
Comments received from experts were carefully systematized and discussed by the chairman and members of the working group. Each item was discussed, and the resulting changes to the guidelines were recorded. If no changes were made, the reasons for refusing to make changes were recorded.
Consultation and peer review:
A preliminary version was posted for broad discussion on the website of the National Hematological Society for broad discussion and improvement of the guidelines.
The draft recommendations were also reviewed by independent experts who were asked to comment primarily on the clarity and accuracy of the interpretation of the evidence base underlying the recommendations.
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines
The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
The decision to update is made by the Russian Ministry of Health based on proposals submitted by medical non-profit professional organizations. The formulated proposals must take into account the results of comprehensive assessments of medicinal products and medical devices, as well as the results of clinical testing.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Appendix A3.1. Protocol for the administration of ATG** in AA No. 1 [12,17,54]
2 days prior to the start of ATG therapy | |
|---|---|
#Co-trimoxazole [sulfamethoxazole+trimethoprim]** | 480 mg orally once daily |
#Prednisolone** | 30 mg daily orally |
Daily for 5 days (4 days at a dose of 40 mg/kg/day) | |
#ATG1 equine | 20 mg/kg (or 40 mg/kg) daily intravenously by drip infusion over 12 hours2 |
Glucocorticoids | #Prednisolone**, 60 mg, or #Methylprednisolone**, 125–250 mg, twice daily intravenously by drip infusion (before and after ATG**) |
Systemic antihistamines | twice daily intravenously by drip infusion (before and after ATG**) in accordance with approved indications |
Transfusion therapy | |
Donor platelets | Platelet concentrate, at a platelet count of less than 20.0 × 109/L and in the presence of hemorrhagic syndrome daily |
Donor red blood cells | Red blood cell suspension, at a hemoglobin level of less than 80 g/L daily or every other day |
From day 14 of the course3 (in the absence of or after the resolution of serum sickness symptoms), a gradual reduction of the daily dose of oral #prednisolone**, is initiated until complete discontinuation on days 21–24. | |
1 Before the first administration of ATG**, the patient's individual sensitivity to protein is tested using a duplicate intradermal test with tetanus antitoxin**.
2 The daily dose of the drug is administered in 1200–1500 ml of physiological saline (sodium chloride solution **).
3 The first day of the course is the day of the first administration of ATG**.
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix C. Patient Information
Aplastic anemia is a rare and life-threatening blood disorder caused by bone marrow dysfunction. In people with aplastic anemia, the bone marrow does not produce enough of all three types of blood cells — red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets.
Red blood cells are essential for carrying oxygen throughout the body. White blood cells help us fight infections, germs, and other pathogens. Platelets are responsible for stopping bleeding and healing bruises.
The word «aplastic» refers to the body's inability to create new cells, resulting in the hematopoietic tissue's inability to grow or regenerate.
Aplastic anemia can occur at any age, but is most common in young people (ages 10 to 20) and older adults (over 60).
It is estimated that 100 to 150 people are diagnosed in the UK each year. This is about 2 people per 1,000,000 population. This makes aplastic anemia an extremely rare disease. The exact time of onset is unknown, and further research is needed to establish a baseline figure.
Aplastic anemia can be inherited (pertaining only to constitutional forms of AA), but most commonly it is an acquired disease that develops at a certain stage in a person's life.
It is believed that in many cases, acquired aplastic anemia is caused by damage to blood stem cells through an autoimmune reaction in the body. An autoimmune reaction occurs when the body's immune system fights its own cells, mistakenly perceiving them as damaged or defective. When this happens, bone marrow function begins to slow down, leading to a decrease in the production of all blood cell types. Autoimmune reactions may have an underlying cause—approximately one in ten people with aplastic anemia has recently had a viral infection. Other potential triggers have been identified as exposure to certain medications or chemicals, as well as radiation exposure. However, in many cases, the cause remains unknown. When there is no obvious reason for the immune system to damage stem cells in this way, a diagnosis of idiopathic aplastic anemia is established.
The most common symptoms of aplastic anemia are anemia caused by a reduced red blood cell count, accompanied by fatigue, shortness of breath, headaches, and sometimes chest pain. A lack of white blood cells can lead to infections such as sinusitis, pharyngitis, pneumonia, and intestinal infections. A low platelet count leads to a tendency for easy bleeding, such as nosebleeds or gum bleeding, and can cause unexplained bruising, blood blisters in the mouth, and severe hemorrhages, such as into the brain or intestines.
Since AA is presumed to be autoimmune in nature, immunosuppressive therapy is widely used for its treatment—that is, therapy aimed at suppressing the immune system that is "attacking" the bone marrow cells. Typically, this therapy includes antithymocyte globulin** (ATG) combined with #cyclosporine**; glucocorticoids such as methylprednisolone** can be used to prevent the side effects of ATG. The response to this therapy is usually slow: in successful cases, the bone marrow gradually recovers several weeks or months after administration of the drugs and begins producing healthy cells.
Hospitalization is usually necessary to administer a course of immunosuppressive therapy with ATG. The main complications during treatment are infections and bleeding. If there is no response to the first course of therapy, a repeated course may be administered. Immunosuppressive therapy is effective in approximately 70% of cases. Unfortunately, some patients experience relapses of the disease afterward.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, if successful, leads to a complete cure. Transplantation is particularly preferred in cases where the patient is young and has a fully matched related donor (sibling). In the absence of a related donor, the use of a matched unrelated donor or a haploidentical related donor (haploidentical transplantation) is acceptable. Previously, transplants from unrelated or partially matched donors in AA were considered very high risk, but their outcomes have improved significantly now.
During the treatment of AA, intensive blood component replacement therapy (transfusions of donor platelets and red blood cells) is often necessary. However, if a bone marrow transplant is planned, it must be kept in mind that multiple transfusions prior to transplantation increase the likelihood of graft rejection.
Prevention and treatment of bacterial, viral, and fungal infections, which pose a major danger to AA patients, are very important. Effective combinations of systemic antibacterial and systemic antifungal drugs are used for treatment, sometimes over a long period.
As adjunctive therapy, growth factors are also used—drugs that help the bone marrow produce the necessary cells. Among them is eltrombopag**, which stimulates blood stem cells and the production of all three blood cell lineages.
Without treatment, patients with severe forms of aplastic anemia die within a few months. However, with modern adequate treatment, the prognosis is quite good.
As already mentioned, immunosuppressive therapy is effective in many cases. Patients after such therapy may feel well for a long time, but some of them experience a relapse (return) of the disease. Regular check-ups, primarily blood tests, are necessary for the timely detection of a relapse.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Not applicable.