List of Abbreviations
BiPAP — from English Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure, BPAP, BiPAP
Borg CR10 scale — Borg category-ratio scale
URT — upper respiratory tract
RF — respiratory failure
DNA — deoxyribonucleic acid
FVC — forced vital capacity
IMV — invasive mechanical ventilation
kDa — kilodalton
CT — computed tomography
CK — creatine kinase (synonym – creatine phosphokinase)
LDH — lactate dehydrogenase
MRI — magnetic resonance imaging
NIV — non-invasive ventilation
FEV1 — forced expiratory volume in one second
ARVI — acute respiratory viral infection
MUAP — motor unit action potential
RFLP — restriction fragment length polymorphism (a method for genomic DNA analysis)
PEF — peak expiratory flow
PCF — peak cough flow
FMP — physical management program
PCR — polymerase chain reaction
RNA — ribonucleic acid
rRNA — ribosomal RNA
mRNA — messenger RNA
CPAP — from English Constant Positive Airway Pressure, CPAP
SMA — spinal muscular atrophy
SMA I — spinal muscular atrophy, type I
ATD — assistive technology devices
FVC — forced vital capacity
LeR — level of recommendation validity
LoE — level of evidence
ECG — electrocardiography
EMG — electromyography
ENMG — electroneuromyography
EchoCG — echocardiography
MLPA — Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification
NIPPV — Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation
OMIM — Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man
PtcO2 — transcutaneous pulse oximetry
PetCO2 — partial pressure of end-tidal CO2
SpO2 — arterial oxygen saturation measured noninvasively via pulse oximetry (mean nighttime oxyhemoglobin saturation)
Terms and Definitions
Auto CPAP (angl. Auto CPAP; according to medical device nomenclature — continuous positive airway pressure ventilator Auto CPAP) is a CPAP device (see below) with automatic adjustment of the delivered air pressure, which determines the required pressure level and supplies airflow only during respiratory pauses, gradually increasing it until an inhalation occurs.
BiPAP (from Eng. Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure, BPAP, BiPAP; according to medical device nomenclature — continuous positive airway pressure ventilator BPAP) — bilevel positive airway pressure ventilation — is a device that provides different levels of positive airway pressure during inhalation and exhalation.
Myocardial hypertrophy is a pathological thickening of the heart walls.
Densitometry is a non-invasive method for determining bone mineral density.
Cardiac chamber dilatation is a pathological enlargement of the volume of the heart chambers.
Myocardial dysfunction is an impairment of myocardial function; dysfunction can be systolic (reduced myocardial contractility), diastolic (slowed relaxation of the heart muscle), and electrical (impaired propagation of electrical depolarization and repolarization through the heart muscle).
Cardiomyopathy is a heterogeneous group of myocardial diseases associated with mechanical and/or electrical dysfunction, usually (but not always) leading to hypertrophy or dilatation, and having various (often genetic) causes.
Capnometry and capnography are the measurement and digital display of the concentration or partial pressure of carbon dioxide in inspired and expired gas during a patient's respiratory cycle.
Acid-base balance (acid-base state, ABS) is the ratio of hydrogen ion concentrations H+ and hydroxyl groups OH in the body's biological fluids.
Contracture is a limitation of passive movement in a joint.
Pathological posture of a limb or limb segment is a pathological position of a limb or its segment resulting from altered muscle tone while the range of motion in the joint(s) is preserved.
Pulse oximetry is a method that allows determining the O2 content in the blood and the pulse rate per minute.
Heart failure is a reduction in the heart's ability to provide pumping function. It can be acute or chronic.
CPAP (from Eng. Constant Positive Airway Pressure, CPAP — constant positive airway pressure in the airways; according to medical device nomenclature — continuous positive airway pressure ventilator CPAP) is an individual medical device for automated long-term assisted intranasal continuous positive airway pressure ventilation used by a patient during night sleep. A CPAP device is a small compressor that delivers a continuous stream of air under a certain pressure into the airways through a flexible tube and a tight nasal or oro-nasal mask. Thus, it prevents the airways from collapsing and blocking the flow of air (and the oxygen necessary for the body). As a result, the risk of sudden death from lack of air in the airways is eliminated, and normal sleep is ensured.
Scoliosis is a three-plane deformity of the spine.
Submaximal exercise load regimen is a regimen characterized by the absence of shortness of breath, fatigue, and muscle pain.
Electromyography (EMG, ENMG, myography, electroneuromyography: myo — muscle and …grapho — to write) is a method for studying bioelectrical potentials arising in the skeletal muscles of humans and animals upon muscle fiber excitation; the recording of electrical activity of muscles.
Enteral nutrition is the administration of nutrients into the gastrointestinal tract (orally, via tubes and stomas) to maintain and correct nutritional status in accordance with the patient's current needs for energy, protein, vitamins, minerals, and trace elements.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Proximal 5q spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder characterized by progressive symptoms of flaccid paralysis and muscle atrophy due to the degeneration of α-motor neurons in the anterior horns of the spinal cord [1].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
The development of proximal 5q spinal muscular atrophy is caused by mutations in the SMN1 (short for survival motor neuron) gene encoding the survival motor neuron protein. The SMN1 gene is mapped to chromosome 5 at locus 5q12.2-q13.3 and has a centromeric copy (SMN2). Both genes consist of nine exons (1, 2a, 2b, 3-8) and differ by five nucleotides in their DNA sequence [1, 2]. The critical point is a cytosine-to-thymine substitution in exon 7 of the SMN2 gene (c.840C > T), which creates a splicing repressor binding site. Due to this sequence difference, the major transcript of the SMN2 gene lacks exon 7 and is functionally defective [3]. However, the SMN2 gene also produces a full-length functional protein, but in relatively small amounts (up to 10%).
Proximal SMA is caused by mutations in the telomeric copy of the gene (SMN1). The main type of mutation in this gene is homozygous deletions of exons 7 or 7-8, which are detected in 95% of patients. The remaining 5% of patients are compound heterozygotes for a deletion in one copy of the SMN1 gene and a point mutation in the other, and extremely rarely, compound heterozygotes for two minor mutations [4]. Mutations in the SMN2 gene cannot cause SMA, but its copy number is currently the main disease modifier. Approximately 80% of the general population has 1-2 copies. Homozygous deletion of the SMN2 gene has been described in 5-10% of healthy individuals. In SMA patients, the variation in SMN2 copy number is much larger and can range from 1 to 6 copies. The small amount of functional protein produced by the centromeric SMN gene copy is able to mitigate the severity of the disease course in patients with an increased number of SMN2 copies [5-8].
The product of the SMN gene is the SMN protein, consisting of 294 amino acid residues with a molecular weight of 38 kDa. The protein functions in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm. In the nucleus, the SMN protein localizes to sphere-like structures called gems, associated with Cajal bodies, which are involved in RNA metabolism. The SMN protein plays an important role in pre-rRNA splicing and the biogenesis of small nuclear ribonucleoproteins, in gene expression at the transcriptional level, and also participates in axonal mRNA transport in alpha-motor neurons [9].
A decrease in SMN protein levels leads to axonal defects in motor neurons, including axonal truncation and/or excessive branching, growth retardation, abnormalities at neuromuscular synapses: accumulation of neurofilaments in presynaptic terminals, formation of immature postsynaptic terminals, functional anomalies, and impaired endocytosis [10, 11].
Modifiers of the clinical course of the disease. The clinical variability of proximal 5q SMA can be explained by the presence of modifying factors. Modifiers can be divided into two main groups: those that affect SMN protein levels and those that do not affect SMN protein levels.
Factors influencing SMN protein levels. Currently, the main modifying factor of SMA is considered to be the SMN2 gene—its copy number and various intragenic variants. There is evidence of a correlation between the severity of the disease and the number of SMN2 gene copies [12]. The higher the number of SMN2 gene copies, generally the less pronounced the clinical symptoms of SMA. However, determining the SMA type solely based on the SMN2 gene copy number is unacceptable and is performed by a physician based on all available information about the disease in a specific patient [12].
Another modifying factor of SMA, directly related to the centromeric copy of the SMN gene, is the single-nucleotide substitution c.859G > C in exon 7 of the SMN2 gene, which leads to the formation of a novel enhancer splice site, resulting in the inclusion of exon 7 into the SMN2 gene transcript. This variant is associated with an increase in blood levels of full-length SMN protein in patients with type II-III SMA [13].
Table 1. Additional factors influencing SMN protein levels
Factor | Effect | |
|---|---|---|
Splicing regulatory factors | Tra2β | ↑ increases exon 7 inclusion ↓ leads to exon 7 skipping |
SF2/ASF | ↑ increases exon 7 inclusion | |
hnRNPA1 | ↑ inhibits inclusion of exon 7 of the SMN2 gene | |
Transcription regulatory factors | CREB1 | ↑ increases SMN protein transcription |
STAT3 | ↑ promotes axon outgrowth | |
IRF-1 | ↑ increases SMN protein levels | |
PRL | ↑ increases lifespan in severe SMA mice | |
Methylation of the SMN2 gene promoter region | ↑ decreases SMN2 gene expression levels | |
mRNA stabilization | U1A | ↑ decreases SMN protein levels |
HuR/p38 | ↑ increases lifespan in severe SMA mice | |
Factors influencing post-translational modification | PKA | ↑ inhibits SMN protein degradation |
GSK3 | ↓ moderately increases survival | |
Exogenous factors | Starvation | ↓↓↓ Exerts a positive effect on survival |
Hypoxia | ↓↓↓ Increases the level of full-length SMN protein. Respiratory support improves symptoms. | |
Oxidative stress | ↓↓↓ Accelerates disease progression |
However, the effect of most of these factors was evaluated in vitro. In vivo, interaction mechanisms are much more complex and require in-depth study.
Factors not affecting SMN protein levels. There are also many modifiers not associated with the SMN gene and its product. More and more mechanisms are discovered every year. Recently, attention has focused on a number of proteins that improve the endocytosis process at synapses, since it has recently been established that endocytosis is one of the key impaired mechanisms in SMA. These proteins include plastin-3 (PLS3), coronin (CORO1C) [14], neurocalcin delta (NCALD) [15], and calcium-binding protein 1 (CHP1) [16].
Of particular interest is DNA methylation, as the most stable modification altering gene expression patterns. A correlation was revealed between the methylation of a number of genes (SLC23A2, NCOR2, DYNC1H1), which may be involved in the pathogenesis of SMA, and disease severity [17-19].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
The prevalence of proximal spinal muscular atrophy is 1 in 6,000–10,000 newborns [20]. Data on the prevalence of the disease in the Russian Federation are absent. The carrier frequency of the disease is 1/40–1/50 in the general population [21, 22]. According to the Research Centre for Medical Genetics (Bochkov Medical Genetics Research Centre), the carrier frequency of the SMN1 gene mutation in Russia is 1/36 individuals, and the estimated birth incidence of a child with SMA is 1 in 5,184 newborns [23].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
G12.0 Infantile spinal muscular atrophy, type I [Werdnig-Hoffmann]
G12.1 Other inherited spinal muscular atrophies
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
The clinical classification of the disease is based on the age of onset, severity of the disease course, and life expectancy [20] (Tab. 2).
Table 2. Clinical classification of proximal 5q spinal muscular atrophy.*
SMA type | Age of onset | Life expectancy | Motor milestones** |
|---|---|---|---|
SMA 0 | prenatal | up to 6 months | none |
SMA I (OMIM#253300) | up to 6 months | up to 2 years | inability to hold head, roll over, or sit without support |
SMA II (OMIM#253550) | 6–18 months | 70% survive to 25 years | ability to sit without support |
SMA III (OMIM#253400) | over 18 months | 10–40 years after manifestation | ability to stand and walk without support |
*type IV SMA also exists, but this type manifests in adulthood
**under the natural course of the disease
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
Proximal spinal muscular atrophy type 0, or congenital SMA with postnatal asphyxia, is the most severe variant of the disease course. At 30–34 weeks of gestation, decreased fetal mobility is noted. After birth, movements are practically absent; contractures, swallowing, and breathing difficulties are present—without respiratory support, the child dies [24].
Proximal spinal muscular atrophy type I, or Werdnig-Hoffmann disease, occurs before the age of 6 months and is characterized by severe muscle weakness. Affected infants are unable to hold their head up, roll over, or sit without support. Proximal, symmetric muscle weakness, lack of motor development, and muscle hypotonia are the main clinical signs of type I SMA. Contractures in the knee and wrist joints are frequently noted, and less commonly in the elbow joints. In the neonatal period or during the first three months of life, children with a fatal prognosis experience difficulties with sucking and swallowing and often demonstrate diaphragmatic breathing. The diaphragm itself is not involved in the pathological process until the final stage of the disease. Swallowing disorders can lead to aspiration pneumonia and death. Patients exhibit tongue fasciculations and postural tremor of the fingers. Most affected children with type I SMA without medical management and specialized care die before the age of two [25].
Proximal spinal muscular atrophy type II, or chronic SMA (Dubowitz disease), has a later onset at 6–18 months of age and a less severe course. Such children retain the ability to sit and hold their head up independently. Patients with type II SMA exhibit tongue fasciculations, tremor of the fingers of outstretched hands, fascicular and fibrillary twitches in the proximal limb muscles, pronounced scoliosis, weakness of the intercostal muscles, and diaphragmatic breathing. Children experience difficulties with coughing and deep breathing during sleep to maintain normal oxygen and carbon dioxide levels [26, 27]. Skeletal deformities develop and progress. Poor sleep at night, fatigue after night sleep, daytime sleepiness, and potential development of morning hypertension are also characteristic (the same changes develop at an older age in type III SMA).
The onset of proximal spinal muscular atrophy type III (juvenile form), or Kugelberg-Welander disease, varies from 18 months of age up to adolescence. Patients with type III SMA retain the ability to move independently, but may frequently fall or experience difficulty climbing and descending stairs, running, bending over, or rising from a sitting position. The lower limbs are more severely affected than the upper limbs in this type of disease. Patients with type III SMA also retain tremor of the fingers of outstretched hands [26-28].
In all types of SMA, the main groups of respiratory muscles can be affected, including inspiratory and expiratory muscles and bulbar musculature, while the degree of involvement and the mechanisms leading to respiratory impairment may vary depending on the SMA type and disease stage. Initially, hypoventilation due to respiratory impairment develops during sleep, and subsequently during the daytime as well. Hypoventilation during sleep leads to apnea. Respiratory disorders are the main cause of complications and mortality in patients with type I and type II SMA; in addition, they can also develop in a small proportion of patients with type III SMA.
Cardiological pathology (cardiac arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, etc.) may be detected in all types of SMA.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition: results of molecular genetic testing (detection of homozygous deletions of exons 7 or 7–8 (i.e., in both gene copies) or homozygous point mutations in the SMN1 gene, or a point mutation and an exon deletion in a compound heterozygous state).
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
The main complaints and anamnesis are described in the section "Clinical presentation of the disease or condition (groups of diseases or conditions)". Complaints requiring separate clarification are listed below:
It is recommended to inquire about complaints of snoring and frequent nocturnal awakenings, morning headaches, and daytime sleepiness in parents of 5q SMA patients for the early diagnosis of hypoventilation and sleep apnea [29].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to inquire about the frequency of infectious diseases and antibiotic therapy over the past 6–12 months (depending on the follow-up frequency) in parents of 5q SMA patients to adequately assess the patients' somatic status [30].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to inquire about complaints of liquid and/or solid swallowing disorders, the sensation of food getting stuck in the throat during swallowing, coughing or choking before, during, or after swallowing, the presence of a hoarse or "wet" voice after swallowing, as well as the impact of eating on the quality of life in parents of 5q SMA patients to rule out dysphagia [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
2.2 Physical Examination
Clinical evaluation of SMA includes a physical examination focusing on the musculoskeletal system and associated functional impairments. The choice of examinations used will depend on the aspects most relevant to each severity grade. Physical examination findings are described in the section "Clinical picture of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)". The specific features of the physical examination are outlined below:
It is recommended to dynamically assess physical development (measurement of body weight and height) in 5q SMA patients to evaluate nutritional status [31].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: changes in nutritional status are frequently observed in SMA patients. Non-ambulatory patients and those with dysphagia are at an increased risk of malnutrition. Sitting and ambulatory patients are at risk of overweight/obesity due to reduced energy expenditure caused by decreased activity upon loss of the ability to walk. Following an SMA diagnosis, all patients must undergo height and weight measurements at least once every 3–6 months in children under 7 years of age, and annually in children over seven years of age, or more frequently as clinically indicated.
It is recommended to assess chewing and swallowing function in 5q SMA patients to rule out dysphagia [20, 32].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: special attention during the examination is paid to potential swallowing disorders during feeding — decreased or absent pharyngeal and palatal reflexes, weakened sucking in young infants, difficulties with chewing and swallowing food, prolonged meal times, and the presence of temporomandibular joint contractures.
It is recommended to perform a clinical respiratory assessment (the assessment includes determining skin color, cough effectiveness, measuring respiratory rate, measuring chest circumference, determining chest excursion, and identifying signs of respiratory muscle dysfunction (presence of paradoxical breathing, use of accessory respiratory muscles) in 5q SMA patients to rule out respiratory disorders [33].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: the frequency of respiratory function assessment and monitoring depends on the clinical status and rate of disease progression in each individual patient. The frequency of assessment averages once every 3–6 months in mild-to-moderate SMA II and SMA III patients. Respiratory functions are assessed less frequently in ambulatory patients in a stable condition, and more frequently in non-ambulatory patients with an unstable disease course. Respiratory assessments can be performed once every 3 months in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation. For children on non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), it is advisable to perform the assessment once a month. In SMA I, if the child is not on NIPPV, respiratory disorders can progress very rapidly, sometimes necessitating even more frequent evaluation.
It is recommended to examine the spine in 5q SMA patients to rule out scoliosis and kyphosis [34, 35].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: skeletal deformations develop in all forms of SMA. Spinal curvature, associated with reduced muscle tone, progressively worsens throughout life. In addition, the majority of patients develop varying degrees of thoracic kyphosis.
It is recommended to assess functional motor status using relevant functional scales and timed tests in patients with 5q SMA to determine baseline status, monitor motor functions, and evaluate the efficacy of disease-modifying therapy [36-39].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: the scales are provided in Appendices G1-G5. Assessments using these scales should preferably be performed by certified specialists on a regular basis every six months, unless specific circumstances dictate a different observation frequency. Serial evaluation of a child using special scales is particularly important when assessing the efficacy of targeted therapy. In the absence of a certified specialist, it is advisable to refer the patient to a center where such specialists are available.
It is recommended to evaluate the intake and excretion of trace elements, especially calcium and vitamin D, in patients with 5q SMA who have nutritional status impairments in order to monitor bone tissue status [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to establish the type of 5q spinal muscular atrophy based on the clinical presentation in accordance with the classification in all patients with a confirmed (clinically and/or genetically) diagnosis to determine the disease prognosis [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: for 5q SMA types (SMA type 1, SMA type 2, and SMA type 3), see Section 1.5 "Classification of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)".
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
It is recommended to perform molecular genetic testing for SMN1 gene exon 7 and/or exon 8 deletions (spinal amiotrophy) in blood for all patients with suspected 5q SMA to detect exon 7 or 7–8 deletions and molecularly confirm the diagnosis [40].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: the “gold standard” of molecular genetic testing for SMA 5q is quantitative analysis — analysis of the copy number of the SMN1 and SMN2 genes. This testing is performed using real-time PCR or quantitative MLPA analysis. The diagnosis is confirmed when deletion of exons 7 or 7-8 is detected in the homozygous state (i.e., in both copies of the gene). Molecular genetic testing for deletion of exon 7 and/or exon 8 of the SMN1 gene (real-time PCR or MLPA analysis) is also indicated for the parents of a patient, or the parents of a deceased child with a presumptive diagnosis of SMA in the absence of their biological material for DNA diagnosis, in subsequent marriages of parents of affected children — their new spouses (if childbearing is planned), spouses of adult SMA patients when planning childbearing; close relatives (siblings of patients and siblings of patients' parents) for prognosis regarding their offspring; sperm and egg donors in in vitro fertilization. Molecular genetic testing for deletion of exon 7 and/or exon 8 of the SMN1 gene, as with a number of other common autosomal recessive diseases, is necessary when planning pregnancy in consanguineous marriages. Parents of children with a molecularly verified diagnosis, as well as couples in which each partner is a confirmed heterozygous carrier of a deletion of exon 7 or 7-8 of the SMN1 gene, should be informed about the possibility of prenatal (during pregnancy) or preimplantation (using in vitro fertilization) DNA diagnosis [44]. It is also possible to perform molecular genetic testing for mutations in the SMN1 gene in the fetus and preimplantation genetic diagnosis of the embryo (using in vitro fertilization) for parents of a patient with SMA 5q, as well as for couples in which each partner is a confirmed heterozygous carrier of a deletion of exon 7 or 7-8 of the SMN1 gene, in order to prevent the recurrent birth of a child with SMA in the family [27]. Prenatal DNA diagnosis can be performed at various stages of pregnancy: 8-12 weeks (chorionic villi), 15-18 weeks (amniotic fluid), 20-24 weeks (cord blood). Testing of a chorionic villus biopsy sample is optimal: in case of an unfavorable prognosis, the pregnancy can be terminated within the time frame of a standard medical abortion.
It is not recommended to use PCR-RFLP analysis and other qualitative testing methods as the method of choice in patients with suspected 5q SMA for diagnosis confirmation [41].
GCR CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to search for point mutations in the SMN1 gene by direct automated Sanger sequencing in patients with a detected heterozygous deletion to establish the diagnosis [42].
Leveled of Evidence CLevel of Data Reliability 2Level of evidence C (level of data reliability – 2)
Comments: the presence of a heterozygous deletion is defined as the presence of a single copy of the SMN1 gene. Detection of a pathogenic mutation in the second copy of the SMN1 gene confirms the diagnosis of SMA.
It is not recommended to establish a diagnosis of 5q SMA in patients without exon 7 or exons 7–8 deletion of the SMN1 gene [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the absence of exon 7 or exons 7–8 deletion of the SMN1 gene is defined as the presence of 2 or more copies of the SMN1 gene detected by real-time PCR or quantitative MLPA analysis. In cases of consanguineous marriages, it is mandatory to screen for point mutations in the SMN1 gene using direct automated Sanger sequencing, even if exon 7 or exons 7–8 deletions of the SMN1 gene are absent.
It is recommended to determine the copy number of the SMN2 gene in a patient with a confirmed genetic diagnosis of 5q SMA to determine the disease prognosis [43].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: it should be borne in mind that the type of SMA in a particular patient cannot be established by the SMN2 copy number; it is determined solely on a clinical basis. The SMN2 copy number must be taken into account when predicting the course of the disease, as it is an important factor determining the severity of the clinical picture. Patients and their families should be advised during counseling that despite the strong correlation between the SMN2 copy number and prognosis, exceptions do exist.
It is recommended for patients with SMA to undergo a complete blood count (CBC) with differential (including assessment of total hemoglobin, erythrocyte count, color index, leukocyte count, platelet count, leukocyte differential, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate) to evaluate basic hematopoietic parameters and the presence of inflammatory processes [111, 130].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: this test is monitored dynamically depending on the disease-modifying therapy, but at least twice a year [101, 105–107].
It is recommended for patients with SMA to undergo a general clinical blood chemistry panel (including blood glucose, total protein, protein fraction electrophoresis, total cholesterol, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, alkaline phosphatase activity, gamma-glutamyl transferase activity, creatinine, urea, alanine aminotransferase activity, aspartate aminotransferase activity, total calcium, ionized calcium, sodium, potassium, inorganic phosphorus, serum iron, and ferritin) to assess the functional state of internal organs, the presence of infectious complications, and the patient's nutritional status [112–115].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: this test is monitored dynamically depending on the disease-modifying therapy, but at least once a year [101, 105–107].
It is recommended to perform a coagulogram (screening hemostasis assessment), including activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), prothrombin time/index, and fibrinogen level, in patients with SMA to assess liver function and the blood coagulation system [88, 116].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: this test is monitored dynamically as clinically indicated.
It is recommended for patients with SMA to undergo a urinalysis to assess the condition of the urinary tract and kidneys [115, 117].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: this test is monitored dynamically twice a year.
It is not recommended to rule out a diagnosis of SMA in patients with an atypical clinical presentation of 5q SMA based solely on moderately elevated creatine kinase activity [45].
Level of Recommendations CLevel of Evidence 3Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: creatine kinase (CK, CPK) levels are usually normal or slightly elevated; however, isolated cases with a high (10-fold) increase in enzyme activity have been described. Thus, an elevated enzyme level does not necessarily rule out a diagnosis of SMA.
It is recommended for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA, especially patients with type I SMA, to undergo blood gas analysis and acid-base status assessment to evaluate the degree of respiratory compensation and determine the strategy for respiratory support [46].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: changes in acid-base balance occur at advanced stages of respiratory failure. For timely diagnosis, it is advisable to use more informative instrumental methods (capnometry, etc. — see below). Decompensation of respiratory disorders is diagnosed in the presence of hypercapnia and acidosis.
It is recommended for all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA to undergo blood glucose testing to rule out hypoglycemia [113].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to test blood levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA to rule out potential metabolism disorders and provide subsequent correction [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: there is a consensus on the need to perform this test at least once a year.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
2.4.1 Instrumental diagnostics for 5q SMA
It is recommended to perform needle electromyography (one muscle) and stimulation electroneuromyography of a single nerve (concurrently) in patients who develop symptoms of proximal muscle weakness with absent or diminished tendon reflexes after 18 months of age (characteristic of type III SMA), as well as in cases of earlier onset of these symptoms without the typical clinical manifestations of type I and II SMA, for the purpose of establishing a diagnosis [48, 49].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: when examining patients with SMA, needle electromyography (one muscle) (EMG) and stimulation electroneuromyography of a single nerve (ENMG) should be used. Stimulation electroneuromyography of a single nerve allows assessment of the response of spinal motor neurons by examining F-waves. Stimulation electroneuromyography of a single nerve reveals F-wave abnormalities: the appearance of giant F-waves, paired and repeated F-waves, scattered F-waves, or their absence (F-wave blocks). Conduction velocities and M-wave amplitudes along peripheral motor fibers can be either normal or slightly reduced due to secondary axonal changes. Needle electromyography (one muscle) makes it possible to examine a specific muscle and determine the degree of denervation activity. Findings characteristic of needle electromyography (one muscle) include: increased amplitude of the interference pattern, rarefaction of the interference pattern, and the appearance of various spontaneous activity potentials forming a so-called "fence rhythm" [49].
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the muscular system in patients with proximal muscle hypotonia and muscle weakness who lack a genetic confirmation of the diagnosis, for the purpose of differential diagnosis between 5q SMA and other neuromuscular disorders [50].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: MRI of the muscular system reveals fatty replacement of muscle tissue. A characteristic pattern of involvement is visualized—hypertrophy and relative sparing of the long head of the adductor magnus/longus muscle (m. adductor longus), which is quite specific for spinal muscular atrophy. However, this specific pattern of involvement appears at a late stage of the disease, and it is quite difficult to detect at the very onset of the disease and in young children.
It is recommended to perform a muscle biopsy in a patient with an atypical variant of spinal muscular atrophy if the 5q SMA diagnosis is not genetically confirmed, for the purpose of differential diagnosis between 5q SMA and other neuromuscular disorders [51].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform a pathomorphological (histological) examination of muscle biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods in a patient with an atypical variant of spinal muscular atrophy if the 5q SMA diagnosis is not genetically confirmed, for the purpose of differential diagnosis [51].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: pathomorphological examination of muscle biopsy (surgical) material in patients with spinal muscular atrophy reveals non-specific signs of fascicular atrophy and muscle fiber grouping. Most hypertrophied muscle fibers belong to type I. All immunohistochemical markers will be normal. Ultrastructural changes will also be non-specific.
2.4.2 Instrumental diagnostics for cardiac complications of 5q SMA
It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram in all patients with 5q SMA to rule out cardiac arrhythmias [52].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
Comments: congenital structural abnormalities (septal defects, outflow tract defects) predominate in patients with type I SMA. In patients with less severe forms of SMA, acquired arrhythmias predominate, most frequently — rhythm initiation disorders. If complaints or clinical symptoms of cardiovascular involvement appear, the frequency of follow-up examinations is determined individually for each patient. The test should be performed at least once a year, as well as prior to orthopedic surgery.
It is recommended to perform echocardiography in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA at least once a year to rule out, assess the severity of, or monitor congenital or acquired heart disease [53].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: congenital heart defects are occasionally seen in SMA type I. Cardiomyopathy is more commonly observed in patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 1 and 2 and typically presents as dilated cardiomyopathy. In severe cases, a classic presentation of pulmonary hypertension may develop (dyspnea, cyanosis, hemodynamic disturbances up to pulmonary edema due to compression of the left ventricle by enlarged right chambers and reduced ejection capacity of the left ventricle). Echocardiography should be performed in patients with less severe forms of 5q SMA who present with clinical symptoms, as well as in all 5q SMA patients as a preoperative assessment.
2.4.3 Instrumental diagnostic tests for musculoskeletal complications of 5q SMA
It is recommended to perform dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine in patients with a diagnosis of 5q SMA older than 6 years once a year to rule out osteoporosis. If osteoporosis of the lumbar spine is detected, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is recommended (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the proximal femur; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the forearm). This study is also recommended during preparation for orthopedic surgery [54].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: patients with SMA are characterized by a high frequency of fractures and osteopenia. These risks are driven not only by muscle weakness and low mobility, but also by the fact that the SMN gene plays a role in bone tissue metabolism [54].
It is recommended to perform spinal radiography (spine radiography, special examinations and projections, cervical spine radiography, thoracic spine radiography, thoracolumbar spine radiography, lumbar spine radiography), special examinations and projections with Cobb angle measurement in patients with 5q SMA presenting with postural abnormalities and/or visible deformities of the chest and spine to rule out kyphoscoliosis and determine further orthopedic management [55].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: spinal radiography (spine radiography, special examinations and projections, cervical spine radiography, thoracic spine radiography, thoracolumbar spine radiography, lumbar spine radiography, pelvic radiography) is performed in anteroposterior and lateral projections. The study is conducted in the most upright position achievable by the patient, regardless of assistive devices (i.e., sitting in children who can sit independently, standing in SMA III, supine in non-ambulatory patients) to determine and quantify the degree of spinal deformity in both the frontal and sagittal planes. Radiography is performed in patients with SMA I and SMA II with scoliosis > 20° (anteroposterior spine radiography in sitting and supine positions) every 6 months, and then annually after skeletal maturity to monitor the progression of kyphoscoliosis and determine further orthopedic management. In specific clinical scenarios (appearance of new clinical symptoms of the pathology and their worsening), the study is performed more frequently. The frequency of evaluations should be determined by the relevant specialist or a multidisciplinary team.
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging of the spine (one segment) / computed tomography of the spine (one segment) / ultrasound of the spine in patients with 5q SMA as clinically indicated [122, 123, 124].
For computed tomography of the spine (one segment), Level of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence – 3)
For magnetic resonance imaging of the spine (one segment) and ultrasound examination of the spine. Level of recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: conducting additional studies is especially indicated in the case of administration of nusinersen**, if a lumbar puncture at the C1-C2 level is being considered.
It is recommended to perform radiography of the hip joint (hip joints) in all patients diagnosed with 5q SMA to exclude the development of dislocation or subluxation in the hip joints and to determine further orthopedic management tactics for the patient [166, 167].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: radiography of the hip joint (hip joints) is performed in the anteroposterior view with evaluation of the femoral head migration index and the vertical center-edge angle. In the presence of signs of femoral head migration, radiography is performed in the anteroposterior view with maximum possible hip abduction to clarify the degree of femoral head centration upon abduction. If the patient has pronounced hyperlordosis or flexion contractures in the hip joints, positioning correction is required to eliminate lordosis by placing a bolster under the popolar region or by changing the centration of the X-ray tube taking into account the pelvic tilt. Radiography of the hip joint (hip joints) is performed for all patients in the "non-ambulatory" and "sitter" categories every 6 months if there are radiological signs of femoral head migration. For patients in the "walker" category, radiography is performed once at the time of diagnosis and is repeated only in the presence of clinical or radiological signs of joint changes. For specific indications (appearance of new clinical manifestations of pathology and their negative dynamics), the examination is performed more frequently. In this case, the frequency of examinations must be determined by a specialized physician or a multidisciplinary medical board.
2.4.4 Instrumental examinations for the diagnosis of respiratory complications of 5q SMA
It is recommended to perform targeted chest X-ray in all patients with 5q SMA to exclude atelectasis [30].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: this examination is performed at least once every 2 years.
It is recommended to perform capnometry in patients with type I SMA to detect and assess hypoventilation [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: for non-ambulatory patients, this examination should be performed every 3 months; for less severe patients, less frequently.
It is recommended to perform transcutaneous carbon dioxide and oxygen monitoring during nighttime sleep in an inpatient setting for patients with type I 5q SMA, as well as in patients with type II 5q SMA with minimal suspicion to detect nocturnal hypoventilation and obstructive sleep apnea; if this is not possible, it is permissible to perform determination of partial pressure of oxygen in soft tissues (oximetry) [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: normally, saturation values are within 95-100%. If SpO2 is below 90%, emergency measures must be taken. Saturation between 94-90% is considered borderline. Patients with hypoventilation must have a pulse oximeter at home.
It is recommended to perform pulmonary function testing (spirometry) to measure unforced respiratory volumes and flows in patients with 5q SMA older than 5 years to determine the severity of respiratory impairment and select the type of respiratory support [56].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: unprovoked respiratory volumes and flows testing should be performed in patients with SMA older than 5 years who are able to perform the test, once every 6 months for type II SMA and once every 12 months for type III SMA. The best and simplest parameter for monitoring respiratory muscle strength in pediatric patients with SMA (capable of performing the test) is forced vital capacity (FVC). Patients with an FVC reduction of 20% to 50% of predicted are at increased risk of pulmonary complications, and patients with FVC < 20% are at an even higher risk. Patients with FVC > 60% have a low risk of nocturnal hypoventilation. Assessment of respiratory muscle function effects, including maximal inspiratory pressure, nasal respiratory pressure, or maximal expiratory pressure, does not provide sufficient or additional information when compared to FVC in patients with SMA.
It is recommended to perform cardiorespiratory monitoring (remote monitoring of heart rate and remote monitoring of external respiration parameters) or pulse oximetry (nocturnal) in an inpatient setting for all patients with type I SMA and patients with type II SMA older than 5 years to monitor the progression of respiratory disorders [57].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: the study is performed for patients with a decrease in forced expiration by 45% or more once every 6 months. As of the end of 2019, the study is available for patients in neurological departments specialized in neuromuscular diseases. Of course, it is desirable to introduce this method in other neurological departments as well as for home care support.
It is recommended to perform polysomnography (electroencephalography with video monitoring and/or 24-hour blood pressure monitoring and/or electrocardiogram recording and/or electrocardiographic data monitoring and/or Holter heart rhythm monitoring and/or decoding, description and interpretation of electrocardiographic data and/or skin electromyography (one anatomical zone) and/or electrooculography and/or determination of partial pressure of oxygen in soft tissues (oximetry)) in patients with 5q SMA if hypoventilation is suspected, to clarify its nature and rule out sleep apnea [57].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: patients with SMA are susceptible to sleep-related breathing disorders, most commonly — hypoventilation due to decreased tidal volume, impaired diaphragmatic function, and reduced function of intercostal and accessory muscles. Obstructive syndrome is also observed due to weakness of the laryngeal and pharyngeal muscles, causing a predisposition to airway collapse. In accordance with Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 804n dated October 13, 2017, "On Approval of the Nomenclature of Medical Services," there is no service named "Polysomnography," therefore the use of a set of services is possible.
2.5 Other Procedures
Specialist consultations can be provided to patients at various stages of medical care, including during the disease diagnosis period.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, inspection) by a neurologist for all patients with suspected 5q SMA to confirm the diagnosis [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: if the neurologist confirms the likelihood of the disease, they must refer the child for genetic testing.
It is recommended to perform a follow-up consultation (examination, inspection) by a neurologist for all patients with suspected 5q SMA who have undergone additional examinations (including genetic testing) to confirm the diagnosis, perform differential diagnosis, assess neurological status, motor functions, range of motion, and to prescribe and subsequently adjust therapy [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: subsequent follow-up of the child depending on the patient's functional status (for non-ambulatory patients at least once every 3 months, for sitting patients — once every 6 months, for ambulatory patients — once every 12 months). During the examination, it is necessary to assess the range of active and passive movements in combination with functional tests (Medical Research Council scale, Hamstring test, Silverstein test) and record the data in the patient's medical history in comparison with the previous study. Frequency of the study is once every 6 months [20, 83].
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, inspection) by a geneticist for patients with suspected 5q SMA to confirm the diagnosis [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the first specialist to whom the pediatrician refers the patient may not be a neurologist, but specifically a geneticist.
It is recommended to perform a follow-up consultation (examination, inspection) by a geneticist for patients with suspected SMA to explain the results of molecular genetic testing and determine the prognosis for offspring [19].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, inspection) by an orthopedic trauma surgeon for a patient with a confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA to assess the presence of skeletal deformities, the child's functional capabilities, and the need and scope of orthotics [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: specialist examination includes determining the range of passive and/or active motion of a single joint in a single plane and the presence of spinal curvatures, as well as determining the static and/or dynamic strength of a single muscle, and the functional capabilities of each limb and joint. Issues regarding necessary orthotics are addressed.
It is recommended to perform a follow-up consultation (examination, inspection) by an orthopedic trauma surgeon for a patient with a confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA to assess the progression of skeletal deformities, select orthotics and postural control technologies, and address the indications for surgical orthopedic treatment [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, inspection) by a pulmonologist for a patient with a confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA to detect respiratory disorders and determine the tactics of respiratory support [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the pulmonologist determines whether the patient needs additional examinations and which ones (determination of partial pressure of oxygen in soft tissues (oximetry), study of acid-base balance and blood gases, targeted chest X-ray, cardiorespiratory monitoring, unprovoked respiratory volumes and flows testing).
It is recommended to perform a follow-up consultation (examination, inspection) by a pulmonologist for a patient with a confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA to detect respiratory disorders and determine further tactics of respiratory support [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, inspection) by a gastroenterologist for a patient with 5q SMA in the presence of relevant complaints (see section "Complaints and anamnesis") to prescribe examination and treatment [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform a follow-up consultation (examination, inspection) by a gastroenterologist for a patient with 5q SMA in the presence of relevant complaints (see section "Complaints and anamnesis") to diagnose complications and determine treatment efficacy [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, inspection) by a dietician for a patient with 5q SMA who has nutritional status disorders or is at risk for undernutrition or overnutrition, for dietary correction [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform a follow-up consultation (examination, inspection) by a dietician for a patient with 5q SMA and nutritional status disorders to evaluate diet effectiveness [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, inspection) by a pediatric cardiologist for a patient with 5q SMA upon detection of pathological changes on ECG and echocardiography to prescribe therapy [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform a follow-up consultation (examination, inspection) by a pediatric cardiologist for a patient with 5q SMA who has been prescribed treatment, in order to evaluate its effectiveness [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, inspection) by a palliative care physician for children with 5q SMA, if indicated, to determine the required scope of palliative care [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: palliative care consultation can be provided at all stages of SMA patient management: at diagnosis, during key therapeutic decision-making, in the event of life-threatening conditions, and in the terminal phase of the disease.
It is recommended to perform a follow-up consultation (examination, inspection) by a palliative care physician for children with 5q SMA, if indicated, to determine the required scope of palliative care and evaluate its effectiveness [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform a consultation (examination, inspection) by a physical therapy physician for a patient with 5q SMA to determine the scope and plan of rehabilitation [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to schedule a follow-up physical therapy consultation (examination, assessment) for a patient with 5q SMA to evaluate rehabilitation efficacy and determine further treatment tactics [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to schedule an initial physical therapy consultation (examination, assessment) for a patient with 5q SMA to determine the physical therapy management plan [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to schedule a follow-up physical therapy consultation (examination, assessment) for a patient with 5q SMA to determine the physical therapy management plan [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to use a multidisciplinary approach in the management of patients with SMA (initial and follow-up consultations with an endocrinologist, neurosurgeon, anesthesiologist-resuscitator, pediatric surgeon, endoscopist, otorhinolaryngologist, thoracic surgeon, maxillofacial surgeon, and psychotherapist) because the disease is characterized by multi-organ and multisystem involvement and requires complex therapy, which necessitates coordinated management by specialists from various fields [19, 131].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
3.1 Pharmacotherapy
Pharmacotherapy for 5q SMA is categorized into disease-modifying therapy—aimed at correcting SMN protein deficiency using drugs with different mechanisms of action—and symptomatic therapy (management of individual disease symptoms).
3.1.1 Disease-modifying pharmacotherapy
There are several approaches to disease-modifying therapy. Gene replacement therapy, administered as a single dose, uses onasemnogene abeparvovec. The mechanism of action of this therapy is based on the delivery of a functional copy of a gene (transgene), which replaces the defective SMN1 gene function and restores SMN protein production. The use of SMN2 gene splicing modifiers (genetic modification) increases the expression of full-length functional proteins [56-58].
The antisense oligonucleotide drug nusinersen** was approved for the treatment of all SMA types in the USA in December 2016, approved for use in Europe in May 2017, and registered in the Russian Federation in 2019 [58, 59]. The small-molecule drug risdiplam** (administered orally) was approved in the USA in August 2020 and in Russia in December 2020. Onasemnogene abeparvovec, which is a non-replicating recombinant adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector utilizing the adeno-associated virus serotype 9 (AAV9) capsid to deliver a stable, fully functional SMN1 transgene, was approved in the USA in May 2019, approved for use in Europe in May 2019, and registered in the Russian Federation in December 2021 [101-104].
Direct comparative studies of the medicinal products do not exist due to the complexity of forming comparison groups. The choice of drug should be determined by the attending neurologist, taking into account the number of SMN2 copies, the patient's baseline functional status, the route of administration, dosing frequency, and pharmacoeconomic data.
The use of nusinersen** was studied in patients with type 1 5q SMA aged 1.7 to 6 months at the time of the first administration in the ENDEAR study; the study demonstrated convincing efficacy and safety of the drug in this age group [61]. The use of nusinersen** was studied in patients with type 2 or 3 SMA aged 2 to 9 years at the time of the first administration in the CHERISH study; the study demonstrated convincing efficacy and safety of the drug in this age group [63]. The use of nusinersen** was studied in patients with type 2 or 3 SMA aged 2 to 15 years at the time of the first administration in the CS2/12 study; the study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the drug in this age group.
Upon completion of the 5-year FIREFISH study, type 1 SMA children treated with risdiplam** demonstrated improvement or stabilization of disease-related outcomes; specifically, the majority of children achieved key motor milestones that would not be observed in the natural history of the disease. Furthermore, 91% of the children were alive, and 81% achieved event-free survival; the majority of children maintained the ability to swallow and feed orally. It was noted that no treatment-related adverse events with risdiplam** led to treatment discontinuation or cessation, and the frequency of adverse events and serious adverse events decreased after the first year of risdiplam** use. The use of risdiplam** was evaluated in patients with type 2 or 3 SMA aged 2 to 25 years at screening in the international (including patients from Russia) clinical study SUNFISH. The study demonstrated statistically significant clinical improvements over 24 months of therapy as assessed by the MFM-32 (Appendix G5) and RULM (Appendix G3) scales. The most common adverse effects of risdiplam** may include upper respiratory tract infections, pneumonia, pyrexia, constipation, and nasopharyngitis. It was shown that the improvements in motor function scores observed during the first year of risdiplam** treatment were sustained at 4 years. Patients and caregivers reported a continued reduction or stabilization in the level of assistance required for daily living activities. Adverse events and serious adverse events reflected the underlying disease, while the overall incidence of adverse events decreased over the 4-year period.
The use of onasemnogene abeparvovec was studied in the completed clinical trials START [104], STRIVE-EU [101], and STRIVE-US [106] in patients with type 1 SMA under 9 months of age, as well as in the SMART study in children weighing between 8.5 kg and 21 kg with a confirmed diagnosis of SMA who had previously received other disease-modifying therapies (nusinersen** or risdiplam**) [140]. Convincing efficacy and safety of the drug were demonstrated in these patient populations. The use of onasemnogene abeparvovec was also evaluated in the SPRINT study in pre-symptomatic (presymptomatic stage) SMA patients under 6 weeks of age [132, 133]. The results of clinical trials and systematic reviews with meta-analyses indicate that the administration of onasemnogene abeparvovec at the therapeutic dose in patients with both pre-symptomatic and symptomatic SMA provides a rapid therapeutic effect that increases over time, improves survival, and enhances motor function as assessed by various motor scales compared to the natural history of the disease [101, 104, 106, 132, 133, 140-143].
It is recommended to initiate disease-modifying therapy as early as possible in all patients with 5q SMA following molecular genetic confirmation of the diagnosis, including patients identified through newborn screening, in order to achieve the best therapeutic outcome [60, 155, 156, 158-161].
GCR ALEL 3Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: to date, accumulated data indicate that even patients identified through newborn screening may show early signs of SMA shortly after birth; therefore, it is critical to initiate therapy as early as possible to improve prognosis [155, 156, 158-161]. At the same time, it should be kept in mind that in patients with severe symptoms (such as invasive mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation for more than 16 hours per day, absence of swallowing function due to bulbar syndrome, and flaccid tetraplegia), irreversible degeneration of motor neurons and muscle tissue is likely the most significant factor contributing to a lack of expected efficacy or phenotypic recovery, regardless of the amount of SMN protein produced by any therapeutic approach.
It is recommended to use nusinersen** in patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA with 2 or more copies of the SMN2 gene, presenting clinically with type 1 SMA, as disease-modifying therapy [61].
GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to use risdiplam** in patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA with 2 or more copies of the SMN2 gene, presenting clinically with type 1 SMA, as disease-modifying therapy [168-172].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
It is recommended to use the drug nusinersen** in patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA, clinically corresponding to type 2 or 3 SMA, as pathogenetic therapy for the disease [63].
GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: intrathecal administration (NMU: Administration of medicinal products into the spinal canal) of nusinersen** may be accompanied by adverse events associated with lumbar puncture (NMU: spinal puncture): fever, headache, back pain, vomiting, post-puncture syndrome.
Performing an intrathecal puncture may be difficult in the presence of severe spinal deformity or implanted metal hardware. Severe scoliosis and implanted metal hardware without a window for access are contraindications to the use of nusinersen**.
Following administration of nusinersen**, transient changes may be observed: thrombocytopenia, coagulation disorders, and nephrotoxicity.
It is recommended that 5q SMA patients, after administration of nusinersen** and when clinically indicated, undergo laboratory monitoring of the following parameters: platelet count, coagulation parameters (LMS: Coagulogram [screening test of the hemostatic system]), daily urinary protein excretion, and cerebrospinal fluid analysis (LMS: "Serological examination of cerebrospinal fluid") [63, 64].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comment: following the administration of nusinersen**, transient changes may be observed: thrombocytopenia, coagulation disorders, and nephrotoxicity.
It is recommended to use nusinersen** at the pre-symptomatic stage of 5q SMA in patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis and 2 or 3 copies of the SMN2 gene as disease-modifying therapy [66].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to use risdiplam** in patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA, clinically corresponding to type 2 or 3 SMA, as disease-modifying therapy [173-175].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to use onasemnogene abeparvovec as a single dose in SMA patients with a biallelic mutation in the SMN1 gene as disease-modifying therapy [101, 138].
GCR CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: the main contraindications to the drug are the presence of antibodies to AAV9; other contraindications may include liver disease, mechanical ventilation or non-invasive ventilation for more than 16 hours per day, inability to swallow due to bulbar syndrome, and flaccid tetraplegia. In patients with a severe functional status and a prolonged disease course, administration of the drug may not yield the proper effect. Onasemnogene abeparvovec, administered as a single dose, is a non-replicating recombinant adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector containing a modified nucleic acid sequence of the SMN1 gene. Upon entering the motor neuron nucleus, the transgene compensates for the gene function lost due to the mutation without integrating into human DNA and restores the production of SMN protein, which is responsible for the preservation and development of motor neurons [102-104]. Testing for antibodies to adeno-associated virus serotype 9 (AAV9) must be performed in patients to confirm eligibility for gene replacement therapy. The drug is administered as an intravenous infusion. Gene replacement therapy must be administered in a hospital setting equipped with either an intensive care unit or a critical care unit. The most frequent adverse effects of onasemnogene abeparvovec are elevated hepatic transaminases, hepatotoxicity, vomiting, and pyrexia. For 24 hours before and after the onasemnogene abeparvovec infusion, glucocorticoid immunomodulation is required (see the next statement). In the post-infusion period, it is necessary to monitor laboratory parameters of liver function (determination of blood ALT activity, blood AST activity, and total blood bilirubin level), blood platelet count, and blood troponin I level, as well as monitor potential adverse events for at least 3 months after the onasemnogene abeparvovec infusion and in other cases when clinically indicated [101].
It is recommended that patients with SMA prescribed onasemnogene abeparvovec receive glucocorticoid immunomodulation (#prednisolone** orally at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day or an equivalent dose of another glucocorticoid) for 24 hours before and after the onasemnogene abeparvovec infusion [101, 105-107].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to use risdiplam** at the pre-symptomatic stage of 5q SMA in patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis with 2, 3, 4, or more copies of the SMN2 gene as disease-modifying therapy [177, 178].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is not recommended to use combination therapy (prescribing disease-modifying therapy after gene replacement therapy) or concomitant use of 2 disease-modifying therapies with the same target—the SMN2 gene (e.g., nusinersen** and risdiplam**); furthermore, the use of nusinersen** and risdiplam** is not recommended at any stage of 5q SMA in patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis with 0 and 1 copy of the SMN2 gene as disease-modifying therapy [101, 104, 108].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: combination therapy should also include the prescription of nusinersen** or risdiplam** after the administration of onasemnogene abeparvovec, taking into account that the effect of a single infusion is presumed to last throughout the patient's lifetime [101]. Currently, there is no evidence of the efficacy and safety of combination therapy in SMA patients compared to monotherapy; therefore, combination therapy should not be used in routine clinical practice [104]. At present, there are no results from clinical studies or systematic reviews investigating the correlation between SMN protein expression levels and the severity of clinical response [101, 104, 108].
It is recommended that patients with SMA diagnosed at the pre-symptomatic stage of the disease and/or through newborn screening, with 1–4 copies of the SMN2 gene, immediately initiate disease-modifying therapy with: onasemnogene abeparvovec, risdiplam**, or nusinersen** [132-134, 145, 155-161].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: according to the prescribing information for risdiplam**, there are limited safety data from post-marketing use of risdiplam** at the recommended dose in patients < 16 days old. The safety and efficacy of risdiplam** in preterm newborns before reaching a corrected age of 16 days have not been established [147].
It is recommended that children with SMA identified with 5 copies of the SMN2 gene via newborn screening undergo careful monitoring and be prescribed disease-modifying therapy if symptoms develop [153].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: early initiation of disease-modifying therapy in patients with 5 copies of the SMN2 gene immediately after genetic confirmation of the diagnosis during newborn screening may provide clinical benefits for SMA patients, leading to an improved prognosis and the opportunity for normal development alongside healthy peers [153].
It is recommended that if patients scheduled for gene replacement therapy are found to have an elevated AAV9 antibody titer (greater than 1:50), another disease-modifying therapy be prescribed for a short duration (up to 4 months) to control the disease until gene replacement therapy can be initiated [147, 148].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: bridging therapy (short-term therapy with other disease-modifying agents for up to 4 months inclusive) prior to gene replacement therapy may be relevant for SMA patients with a transient increase in antibodies to adeno-associated virus serotype 9 (AAV9), as studies confirm the short-term nature of transient increases in AAV9 antibody titers [147, 148]. In SMA patients identified through newborn screening, the elevated AAV9 antibody titer is due to transplacental transfer of IgG antibodies; on average, the AAV9 antibody titer normalizes to ≤ 1:50 within 6 weeks and depends on the initial elevation degree [147, 148]. Antibody levels are tested every 2–4 weeks depending on the baseline antibody level. Once AAV9 antibody levels normalize to no more than 1:50, consider proceeding with gene replacement therapy.
It is recommended to consider switching therapy to another drug in patients with a genetically confirmed diagnosis of 5q SMA with 2 or more SMN2 gene copies receiving risdiplam** as disease-modifying therapy to nusinersen**, and vice versa, solely based on medical indications [149–151, 157].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: switching from one drug to another within disease-modifying therapy can only be performed based on medical indications, as direct comparative clinical trials of these drugs do not exist due to the complexity of forming comparison groups. The choice of drug should be determined by the attending neurologist, taking into account the number of SMN2 gene copies, the patient's baseline functional status, the route of administration, dosing frequency, and the presence of adverse events.
It is recommended to consider switching therapy to another drug in patients with individual intolerance and/or the development of adverse effects to the prescribed disease-modifying treatment, severe medical conditions that make regular intrathecal drug administrations or oral administration impossible, lack of efficacy assessed 12 months after therapy initiation, or inability to ensure regular drug administration in accordance with the instructions for medical use (e.g., due to low adherence to the prescribed treatment) [149–151, 157].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: evidence indicates that patients with medical indications for a change in therapy may derive additional clinical benefits. However, when choosing a therapy-switch strategy, the benefit-risk ratio should always be carefully weighed. In the absence of objective advantages favoring a change in therapy, such an approach is not advisable.
Criteria for a suboptimal response to therapy (insufficient therapeutic efficacy) in patients with SMA may include the following characteristics [152]:
1) overall deterioration in score confirmed by two consecutive measurements using any 2 of the following 3 scales: a) the patient loses > 2 points on the horizontal push or 1 point on other HINE scales, excluding intentional grasp; b) the patient loses > 4 points on the CHOP INTEND scale; c) the patient loses > 3 points on the HFMSE scale.
2) and/or deterioration of respiratory function: an increase in the need for respiratory support over 24 hours and/or for the given patient, an atypical increase in the number of respiratory infections requiring hospital treatment that cannot be explained by aspiration or lung disease.
Evaluation should be performed 12 months after initiating therapy compared to baseline values. In this regard, the patient's baseline general condition and motor status are of critical importance.
3.1.2 Symptomatic pharmacotherapy
It is recommended to administer drugs of group A12AA — Calcium preparations to all patients with 5q SMA if signs of osteopenia or hypocalcemia are detected, to correct decreased bone mineral density [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to administer drugs of group A11CC Vitamin D and analogues to all patients with 5q SMA if signs of osteopenia or low blood vitamin D concentration are detected, to correct decreased bone mineral density [68].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to administer bisphosphonates to all patients with 5q SMA if signs of osteopenia or frequent fractures are detected, to correct decreased bone mineral density [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to use drugs of group R03AL Adrenergics in combination with anticholinergics, including triple combinations with corticosteroids (selective beta2-agonist + antimuscarinic) for nebulizer therapy in patients with 5q SMA upon detection of bronchospasm to relieve it [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is not recommended to use mucolytic agents for nebulizer therapy long-term in patients with 5q SMA due to the lack of evidence base and the risk of increasing secretory load [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the use of mucolytic agents without therapeutic indications may lead to the liquefaction of secretions of normal viscosity and an increased secretory load.
It is not recommended to empirically prescribe systemic antibacterial drugs to patients with 5q SMA to prevent infectious complications without specific indications for antibiotic therapy [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: at the same time, in patients with type I SMA and frequently ill patients with other SMA types presenting with foci of chronic infection, early initiation of antibiotic therapy for infectious diseases is of paramount importance.
It is recommended to administer botulinum toxin type A** injections into the salivary glands under ultrasound guidance in patients with 5q SMA older than 2 years suffering from hypersalivation, in order to reduce the severity of this symptom [69, 125].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: the required dose of the drug is determined based on body weight in accordance with the product instructions. Patients with hypersalivation are also indicated for oral cavity sanitation [70].
3.2 Surgical Treatment
Surgical treatment of patients with 5q SMA primarily consists of corrective instrumented spinal surgery, as the use of orthopedic devices is palliative in nature and cannot halt the deformity. Patients may also require surgery due to pain syndromes associated with musculoskeletal disorders or fractures.
It is recommended to consider spinal surgery in patients with 5q SMA with severe curvature (Cobb angle for major curvature ≥ 50°) or a high progression rate (≥ 10° per year) to preserve trunk balance, correct chest deformity, and improve overall quality of life [20].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: when deciding on surgical intervention, it is important to consider impaired respiratory function, rib cage deformity, hyperkyphosis, impact on patient mobility and functioning, pelvic tilt, and trunk imbalance. Surgical intervention should be postponed in children under 4 years of age [20].
It is recommended to consider the use of growth-sparing instrumentation in patients with 5q SMA with immature skeletal growth for spinal stabilization [71].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to consider posterior spinal fusion using dual-rod dynamic fixation technology, multi-segment constructs with or without pelvic fixation depending on pelvic involvement in the scoliotic curve in patients with 5q SMA to correct skeletal deformities [72].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to leave one or two levels in the mid-lumbar region free along the midline in patients with 5q SMA when planning spinal surgery to allow for lumbar punctures [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is not recommended to use dynamic spine- or rib-distraction systems (abbreviated as VEPTR for Vertical Expandable Prosthetic Titanium Rib and its analogues) in patients with 5q SMA for the correction of "collapsing chest" type rib deformities due to the low efficacy of these methods [73].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to consider surgical treatment of hip joint instability in patients with 5q SMA suffering from pain, to relieve pain, or those with a forced limb position that hinders positioning or hygienic care [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to consider surgical treatment of contractures in patients with 5q SMA suffering from pain, to relieve pain and increase range of motion [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to consider intramedullary or extramedullary Kirschner wire/pin/locked osteosynthesis in ambulatory patients with 5q SMA with long bone fractures, as well as in non-ambulatory patients with femoral fractures, to achieve fragment stabilization and enable early verticalization, rehabilitation, and accelerated bone union [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: fractures occur in patients with 5q SMA who are unable to walk independently (early and late non-ambulatory stages) following minor trauma, associated with low skeletal loading due to restricted verticalization, osteoporosis, and possible vitamin D deficiency. When choosing a conservative treatment path involving casting (application of a circular plaster cast, removal of a circular plaster cast), prolonged immobilization should be avoided.
It is recommended to perform gastrostomy and feed critically ill patients via gastrostomy in 5q SMA patients after the inability to swallow food is established, in case of a high risk of aspiration syndrome, and in nutritional insufficiency [74].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: prior to gastrostomy, temporary feeding via a nasogastric or nasojejunal tube is necessary. In older patients capable of performing spirometry (assessment of unforced respiratory volumes and flows), this assessment must be performed prior to gastrostomy and should yield at least 50% of the predicted value. Gastrostomy is possible at lower FVC values, but the complication risk will increase as spirometry parameters decline. It should be kept in mind that in patients under 7 years of age, the assessment of unforced respiratory volumes and flows (FVC and FEV1) may be erroneous due to improper breathing maneuver technique.
It is recommended to consider Nissen fundoplication (preferably via an endoscopic approach) for 5q SMA type 1 patients simultaneously with gastrostomy if there are complications of gastroesophageal reflux disease and life-threatening conditions (apnea, bradycardia, aspiration pneumonia) [75].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to place a temporary/permanent tracheostomy in 5q SMA patients for whom non-invasive positive pressure ventilation is insufficiently effective or where a mask interface for invasive mechanical ventilation cannot be fitted [20, 76].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the decision to transition to a tracheostomy must be made taking into account the patient's and family's best interests, clinical status, prognosis, and future quality of life. A tracheostomy should not be placed solely for the purpose of airway clearance. A tracheostomy is placed when the child requires non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for more than 18 hours. The option of ventilation via temporary/permanent tracheostomy may be considered in cases of recurrent pneumonia in non-ambulatory patients, although it should be borne in mind that this approach does not always lead to an improved quality of life and a reduction in hospitalizations. In any case, temporary/permanent tracheostomy placement is performed electively (not in acute situations, placement of a temporary/permanent tracheostomy in ambulatory patients is not justified.
3.3 Other Treatment
3.3.1 Medical nutrition therapy
It is recommended to conduct initial and follow-up consultations (examinations) with a dietician every 3–6 months for early childhood 5q SMA patients and annually for other patients to assess children's nutritional status [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to calculate the diet's caloric value (adjusting caloric intake, fluid consumption, macro- and micronutrients) for 5q SMA patients with impaired nutritional status in order to monitor nutritional levels [77].
GCR ALEL 3Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: when formulating a diet for 5q SMA patients, the requirement for calories (by calculating resting energy expenditure adjusted for activity level), macro- and micronutrients, and fluids is evaluated [77]. General standardized formulas are used for nutritional calculations [78].
It is recommended to avoid fasting in 5q SMA patients to prevent the development of metabolic disorders [79].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: metabolic disorders can develop in SMA patients, especially during emergency conditions: metabolic acidosis, fatty acid oxidation disorders, hyperlipidemia, hyper- or hypoglycemia, and muscular mitochondrial dysfunction. Impaired glucose metabolism has been noted in some SMA patients with obesity. In acute conditions, it is essential to ensure adequate fluid intake and minimize the duration of fasting. Protein-containing feeding should be provided within 6 hours. Monitoring of electrolyte levels (blood sodium assay, blood potassium assay, blood chloride assay), blood glucose assay, and, if necessary, correction are required.
It is recommended to optimize the general body position, as well as the position of the head and arms, to enable independent eating, including the use of special devices, for 5q SMA patients to improve the safety and efficiency of swallowing [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to modify the food consistency to semi-solid in 5q SMA patients suffering from dysphagia, in order to compensate for masticatory weakness and reduce meal duration [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: thick liquids are safer regarding aspiration than more fluid ones. It is necessary to use denser nutritional formulas, gelatinous food forms, and liquid purees. Commercially available maltodextrin-based liquid thickeners can be used.
It is not recommended to routinely use amino acid-based formulas or extensively hydrolyzed protein formulas for 5q SMA patients to improve nutritional status [80].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: the benefit of prescribing an amino acid formula as opposed to intact protein for 5q SMA patients in their first year of life, as well as for children over one year old receiving nutrition via a nasogastric tube or gastrostomy who do not have a cow's milk protein allergy, has not been proven. Dietary recommendations are based on individual tolerance. SMA patients require dairy formulas (based on cow's milk proteins) appropriate for their age. Feeding with extensively hydrolyzed protein or amino acid formulas is indicated for patients with cow's milk protein allergies, in the postoperative period and critical conditions with impaired digestion, as well as for those receiving nutrition via a nasointestinal tube (intestinal tube) or enterostomy.
It is recommended to feed 5q SMA patients receiving tube and gastrostomy feeding with special enteral nutrition formulas to ensure balanced nutrition regarding basic nutrients [20].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: modern enteral nutrition formulas are balanced in their composition of basic nutrients—proteins, fats, carbohydrates, and contain vitamins, macro-, and micronutrients. They vary in caloric density—hypo-, normo-, and hypercaloric—and protein content. Enteral nutrition formulas are selected individually depending on requirements.
It is recommended to use fiber-containing formulas for 5q SMA patients suffering from constipation, to facilitate defecation [20].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: a comprehensive approach using diet therapy is applied to correct constipation; with medication therapy and mechanical bowel evacuation applied if necessary.
It is recommended to place a nasogastric tube in 5q SMA patients with swallowing disorders prior to gastrostomy and subsequent permanent gastrostomy feeding (feeding a critically ill patient via gastrostomy) to prevent aspiration and ensure adequate nutrition [77].
GCR ALEL 3Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to feed critically ill 5q SMA patients with swallowing disorders via a nasogastric tube to prevent aspiration and ensure adequate nutrition [77].
GCR ALEL 3Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 3)
3.3.2 Respiratory support
Assessment and support of respiratory function must be given the highest priority in the management of a 5q SMA patient. Recently, the treatment paradigm for pulmonary manifestations of 5q SMA has shifted from a reactive approach, which involved initiating airway clearance and ventilation measures only when clear indications were present, to a preventive approach involving the implementation of these therapies at earlier stages of the disease. The treatment plan is determined by a respiratory therapist; in domestic practice, this is a fairly wide range of various specialists—anesthesiologists-intensivists, pulmonologists, as well as neurologists and pediatricians focused on neuromuscular disorders.
The key respiratory-related problems in children with SMA are the following: impaired coughing leading to insufficient clearance of secretions from the lower respiratory tracts, nocturnal hypoventilation; chest and lung hypoplasia, and recurrent infections that exacerbate muscle weakness. The main ways to address these tasks are airway clearance and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV). The basic principles of airway clearance should be followed:
Manual and mechanical auxiliary devices for restoring cough function should be utilized for daily use in more severely affected patients. Caregivers must be trained in the use of these devices;
Caregivers must also be proficient in pulmonary secretion clearance techniques, including postural drainage, and be informed about chest physiotherapy methods (drainage massage);
Oximetry data serve as an indicator of therapy effectiveness. Suctioning can be useful for clearing secretions after assisted coughing has been provided.
It is recommended to perform oropharyngeal, nasal, and upper airway suctioning and use a mechanical insufflator-exsufflator in non-ambulatory 5q SMA patients and ambulatory 5q SMA patients with respiratory impairment to prevent pulmonary complications and hypoventilation [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: electrical aspiration and the use of a mechanical insufflator-aspirator should be performed in every patient with ineffective coughing. The main methods of sputum drainage for bedridden and seated patients are a combination of several techniques: a mechanical insufflator-aspirator (cough assist device) with manual chest compressions or postural drainage combined with electrical aspiration. In young and uncooperative children, insufflator-aspirators with an inspiratory trigger function should be used to avoid lung injury if such children hold their breath and resist coughing. A relative contraindication to the use of an insufflator-aspirator is chronic lung disease (e.g., emphysema). The use of an insufflator-aspirator in such a situation should be weighed against the possible risks of pneumothorax.
Other methods of preventing hypoventilation (postural drainage and percussion massage — see Section 4.1.1. "Non-technical rehabilitation methods for non-ambulatory patients").
It is recommended to use bi-level positive airway pressure non-invasive ventilation (BiPAP) in all 5q SMA patients with symptoms of respiratory muscle dysfunction to prevent chest hypotrophy, relieve dyspnea, and manage hypoventilation [57, 76].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the decision to use NIV is made on an individual basis in each specific case. It is unquestionably necessary in the presence of daytime hypercapnia. Nocturnal NIV reduces sleep-disordered breathing symptoms and improves quality of life. NIV must be combined with airway clearance techniques. The use of NIV with a high pressure gradient, even for short daytime periods, can improve chest and lung development as well as reduce rib and sternal deformity in non-ambulatory and ambulatory patients. Individual sizing and fitting of NIV masks is mandatory. This is carried out following an examination of the child, with the option to choose from several mask types of different sizes, taking into account the anatomical features of facial structure. It is essential to have and use two different masks alternately to reduce the risk of pressure ulcers and facial skeleton deformity. The mask type depends on the child's age, preferences, and other circumstances. Optimally, all types of masks should be used. The adjustment of NIV parameters must be performed under the control of gas exchange indicators (nocturnal pulse oximetry, capnometry, capnography, or blood gas and acid-base analysis), taking into account respiratory muscle work and patient subjective comfort.
It is not recommended to use continuous positive airway pressure non-invasive mechanical ventilation (CPAP) in 5q SMA patients with symptoms of respiratory muscle dysfunction to relieve dyspnea and manage hypoventilation [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to provide respiratory monitors and anesthesia systems (positive airway pressure ventilator - BiPAP device) to 5q SMA patients with symptoms of respiratory muscle dysfunction for home-based non-invasive mechanical ventilation [57, 76].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: patients' parents must be provided with medical equipment — an Ambu-type manual resuscitator, an electric suction unit with a rechargeable battery if necessary, and a medical device for respiratory therapy (positive airway pressure ventilator - BiPAP device) for home monitoring of respiratory functions. Parents must be trained in the rules of their use.
It is recommended to use non-invasive mechanical ventilation combined with airway clearance techniques in ambulatory and non-ambulatory 5q SMA patients in acute situations (respiratory tract infections) to prevent the development of complications [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: if the need for NIV arises in acute situations, the availability of equipment for home-based NIV must be considered.
3.3.3 Palliative care
Palliative care is an approach that aims to improve the quality of life of patients and their families facing life-threatening illness. This goal is achieved by preventing and relieving suffering through early identification, thorough assessment, and management of pain and other distressing physical symptoms, as well as the provision of psychosocial and spiritual support [81]. The main task of palliative care is to achieve, maintain, preserve, and enhance the quality of life of the patient as much as possible. However, only the patient in need of palliative care can define what "quality of life" means [82]. It is important not to contrast active (interventional) treatment with palliative care, but rather to complement each other.
The lack of consensus and differing views on the palliative and interventional approaches to treating SMA patients is acknowledged in a number of policy documents on this disease [83]. In the absence of disease-modifying therapy for SMA, a number of families perceived the interventional approach, especially tracheostomy, as creating a conflict between quality of life and its duration, as prolonging the patient's suffering rather than alleviating the burden of their disease [84]. Expert consensus was reached that when managing patients with spinal muscular atrophy, it is necessary to fully outline the range of therapeutic options for them and correctly inform them that choosing palliative or interventional supportive care is not merely a binary choice (choosing one of two) [84]. Thus, the international working group in 2007 was unable to reach agreement regarding palliative care and could only acknowledge significant ethical issues that must be considered when making care decisions in the context of SMA, currently also taking into account recent therapeutic approaches [83]. Subsequent publications have also failed to establish a consensus regarding standards of palliative care as applied to SMA [85].
The availability of pathogenetic treatment methods provides substantial grounds for hope for changing the prognosis, but certain issues require further study before a standard of palliative care for SMA can be developed, including the need to clarify the meaning of palliative care for SMA patients [57]. International experts acknowledge that the key task is to abandon the dichotomous model that pits active treatment against palliative care, in favor of a complementary model [57].
It is recommended to perform mechanical ventilation in 5q SMA patients with tracheostomy placement (mey: placement of a permanent/temporary tracheostomy) in the absence of a response to NIV or the impossibility of its implementation to sustain the patient's life [86].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the decision regarding the use of long-term mechanical ventilation (MV) involves weighing numerous pros and cons, is subjective, and cannot be made unilaterally by a single party (either the patient's side or the physician's side alone). An ethical approach in this case would be one in which the personal opinions and beliefs of the physician can be presented to the family along with the proposed treatment options [87]. The results of several studies indicate significant differences in the attitudes and clinical practices of physicians regarding respiratory support in type 1 SMA patients [88-89]. Parents and other caregivers believe they should have the right to choose for or against the use of home mechanical ventilation. Stress and anxiety among parents in such situations were caused by inadequate support (financial, psychological, and practical) [89]. It must be acknowledged that, unfortunately, in actual clinical practice, the decision to initiate invasive mechanical ventilation may be made without the consent of the child's legal representatives. The lack of an informed choice and a template-based approach to treatment hinder planning and limit decision-making capacity [86].
It is recommended to include parents of patients with 5q SMA in the palliative care decision-making process at all stages of the disease by providing complete and accurate information, in order to help the child's legal representatives make an informed choice in favor of providing palliative care in accordance with their beliefs and preferences [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to provide accessible palliative medical care to patients with 5q SMA, comprehensively delivered by staff of medical organizations and their departments providing specialized palliative medical care to children, in regular interaction with the family to meet the needs of the patient and their legal representatives at various stages of the disease [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: palliative care can be provided at all stages of managing a patient with SMA: at diagnosis, during key therapeutic decision-making, in the event of life-threatening conditions, and in the terminal phase of the disease.
It is recommended that all children with spinal muscular atrophy in need of palliative medical care receive outreach patronage by a mobile palliative care team from a pediatric palliative care department in order to provide specialized pediatric palliative medical care in an outpatient setting [118-121].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to include routine pain intensity assessment using scales appropriate to the child's age and neurodevelopmental level for patients with 5q SMA to select pain management [91].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
It is currently proven that regular physical therapy and rehabilitation of patients can change the natural history curve of 5q SMA: increase the life expectancy and quality of life of patients, and improve their functional and social status. The implementation of this concept is possible only in a goal-oriented rehabilitation format. Thus, the rehabilitation of patients with 5q SMA aims to achieve the following goals: increase patient mobility; slow down the progression of muscle atrophy; prevent the development of secondary orthopedic complications. Goals should be set both in everyday work with the child (lifestyle rehabilitation — which is a joint effort of a physical and rehabilitation medicine physician, parents, and sometimes the child themselves) for longer-term goals, and with each visit of the child to a rehabilitation center for a course of rehabilitation—for short-term and deferred goals.
The process of achieving the set rehabilitation goals defines the following tasks:
prevent the formation of habitual vicious positioning of the limbs and their segments, and, as a result, early contractures;
slow down the process of disuse muscle atrophy;
prevent degenerative shortening of muscle fibers;
prolong the functional activity of patients;
prevent the development of joint contractures in the limbs;
increase patient mobility (maintain/increase the range and amplitude of movements);
create conditions for the physiological development and physiological functioning of internal organs and systems.
Rehabilitation methods for 5q SMA are divided into non-technical (these include physical therapy: therapeutic exercise, massage; muscle stretching, etc.) and technical (orthotics and bracing of the trunk and limbs), including surgical correction of orthopedic problems that prevent their effective performance, as well as other methods (application of circular plaster casts; robotic mechanotherapy for peripheral nervous system diseases, use of rehabilitation exercise equipment; therapeutic swimming in a pool and physiotherapy).
During rehabilitation measures, it is necessary to:
try to integrate physical therapy and regular exercises into the child's daily activities and form a lifestyle based on them;
take into account that fatigue is the dominant symptom in children, and therefore distribute physical exertion evenly throughout the day — "little and often";
stay "a step ahead" — set rehabilitation goals for the next few months taking into account the patient's current musculoskeletal status and predicted deterioration;
it is important that all skeletal muscles are engaged in the child's daily life and none remain inactive.
Some rehabilitation advice is of a general nature and should be implemented for all patients with 5q SMA. However, when talking about the rehabilitation of patients with 5q SMA, a more correct approach is not to rank patients by disease type (SMA I, SMA II, SMA III), but to divide them into functional classes (see above):
non-ambulatory (non-sitting) patients;
sitting patients — capable of active verticalization in a sitting position without support;
ambulatory patients — capable of walking without assistive devices.
This functional classification allows for the specification of rehabilitation tasks for a specific patient taking into account their capabilities (see sections 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 below). It is worth noting that to date, there are no clearly defined unambiguous time (sitting/walking time) or other (distance/steps - for ambulatory patients) criteria for classifying patients as sitting or walking patients, so the choice must be made based on the patient's priority independent position and the motor function they use.
It is recommended that all patients with 5q SMA have an appointment (examination, consultation) with a physical therapy physician to draw up a physical therapy exercise plan [92].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that all patients with 5q SMA have an examination (consultation) with a physical therapist to draw up a physiotherapy plan [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that all patients with 5q SMA who have motor impairments undergo macroenvironment adaptation procedures to improve their quality of life [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: measures are needed to adapt the home (and other) environment to ensure maximum independence of patients through the safety and accessibility of all necessary means.
It is recommended to use therapeutic exercise for peripheral nervous system and joint diseases in all patients with 5q SMA in order to increase the range and amplitude of movements and prevent the development of contractures [92].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: it is important to fight to preserve the movements that the child currently has. For this, it is good to use a kinesiotherapeutic play approach when involving the child in exercises.
It is recommended that all patients with 5q SMA who have respiratory impairments and for the prevention of pulmonary complications and hypoventilation undergo medical chest massage [30].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the massage is percussion-based and its main purpose is the drainage of the upper respiratory tract. Daily percussion chest massages (MMS: medical chest massage) (tapping/vibrations along the tracheobronchial tree from the lower parts of the lungs to the upper ones) are combined with postural drainage to remove accumulated sputum.
It is recommended to use therapeutic exercise for upper respiratory tract diseases (chest kinesiotherapy or postural drainage) in all patients with 5q SMA who have respiratory impairments and for the prevention of pulmonary complications and hypoventilation [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to use mechanotherapy for peripheral nervous system diseases in all patients with 5q SMA in order to increase the range and amplitude of movements and prevent the development of contractures [92].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: patients need stretching exercises accompanied by light massage (warming effect). The minimum frequency of sessions for stretching and increasing the range of motion for non-ambulatory patients is 3-5 times a week, for sitting patients — 5-7 times a week. The duration of sessions for effective stretching and increasing the range of motion depends on the specific needs of the patient, the condition of the joints, and the goals of rehabilitation.
It is recommended to provide therapeutic swimming in a pool for all patients with 5q SMA types 2 and 3 to facilitate movements [93].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: swimming classes are useful and enjoyable for patients with SMA. Water neutralizes the effect of gravity on the child's body, allowing them to feel their body differently. Swimming is a good aerobic workout. This is a variant of active physical therapy for a child with SMA. In addition, swimming improves the emotional state of children. The method has no absolute contraindications in SMA. The water temperature in the pool should be 30o-33o (optimal temperature range for the best muscle metabolism). The first few sessions should take place not only with parents, but also with an instructor who will train the parents. Before each session, it is necessary to assess the child's somatic well-being.
It is recommended to use therapeutic exercise using devices and exercise equipment for peripheral nervous system diseases in all patients with 5q SMA to maintain motor activity and prevent the development of contractures [92].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: a stationary bicycle (exercise bike) can well be used for bedridden patients.
Paraffin therapy is recommended for peripheral nervous system disorders in patients with 5q SMA with contracture development to reduce the severity of contractures [179].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Electromyography-triggered biofeedback training (myostimulation) for peripheral nervous system disorders is recommended for patients with 5q SMA to maintain functional muscle capabilities [94].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Mechanotherapy and robotic mechanotherapy for peripheral nervous system disorders are recommended for all patients with 5q SMA to preserve the range of motion [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: rehabilitation exercise equipment (exercise bike) can be used for bedridden patients, a set of rehabilitation products for musculoskeletal disorders and other rehabilitation equipment for sitting patients, and all of the above plus a treadmill for ambulatory patients.
Application of a circular plaster cast is recommended for patients with 5q SMA with knee and ankle contractures to increase their range of motion [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: specifics of applying a circular plaster cast in patients with SMA include short-course casting (5 days on, 2 days off).
Medical rehabilitation services for children with neuro-orthopedic pathology using therapeutic taping methods are recommended for patients with 5q SMA type 3 to reduce muscle load [95].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: this technique can be used in children with SMA. Tape is able to take on part of the muscle load, thereby allowing the patient to feel their own muscle working. Preference is given to monotaping (taping a single limb), which allows the child to "focus" on the limb and feel the muscle trigger of the taped limb.
4.1 Rehabilitation of non-ambulatory patients
The primary position for these patients at home is the "supine" position, which carries the risk of developing habitual (fixed) vicious postures of the limbs and their segments due to the action of gravity on the limbs and the patient's inability to perform antigravity movements, as well as the occurrence of complications. Thus, the posture characteristic of such children (due to weakness of the hip adductor muscles)—"lying on the back with outwardly rotated hips"—contributes not only to the formation of paralytic hip dislocations, but also to the development of severe pressure ulcers on the greater trochanters. In this context, it is crucial that the child's position in bed and on any other surface is functionally advantageous and prevents the manifestation of vicious postures and their complications. To this end, frequent changes of body position in bed are indicated; the use of improvised aids that can easily change shape and support the weight of the limb, thereby mimicking the antigravity effect (e.g., a mattress filled with millet). Stimulation of daily activity: games and other active pursuits, both with and without special devices (e.g., lightweight toys), should be utilized to the maximum possible extent.
Goals of rehabilitation for bedridden patients:
increasing the volume and amplitude of active/passive movements in any body segment and limbs;
improving head control / movement in the transverse plane in the supine position;
improving manual dexterity;
creating conditions for the development and normal functioning of internal organs;
slowing down the development of true muscle atrophy and disuse atrophy;
mobilization of joints and prevention of contractures.
4.1.1 Non-technical rehabilitation methods for non-ambulatory patients
Therapeutic exercise using suspension systems is recommended for bedridden patients with 5q SMA to increase the volume and amplitude of movements and prevent contractures [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: during physical therapy sessions with bedridden patients, it is convenient to use rubber or fabric bands to suspend limb segments. This method is suitable for use on both upper (shoulders) and lower limbs (thigh-knee-shin). For example, to preserve the functional activity of the upper limbs, the method of eliminating gravitational forces by suspending the proximal segments of the upper limbs on bands can be used, thereby enabling movement of the entire upper limb and, in addition, complementing the diagnostic search for "working" muscles in a deeply paretic upper limb segment (thus, a shoulder suspended on a band can move, for example, in the transverse/frontal planes, which helps to detect "living" muscle portions, often the deltoid muscle portions in the shoulder). This same method helps facilitate play or hand manipulation (e.g., for a "pointing" gesture when working with cards).
It is recommended: performing a medical speech therapy procedure for dysphagia in bedridden patients with 5q SMA, which will be useful for patients of all clinical types of SMA I-III (speech therapy massage techniques; exercises that help engage and train chewing and swallowing muscles, including techniques using speech therapy probes; including training caregivers in swallowing-facilitating postural techniques) in order to train chewing and swallowing muscles, preserve/improve chewing and swallowing functions, prevent jaw contractures, and train bite strength [20, 126, 128, 129].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended: performing a medical speech therapy procedure using interactive information technologies in bedridden patients with 5q SMA (used in articulation improvement and speech disorder correction classes, can be used during articulation gymnastics) — including as methodological options when integrated with the medical speech therapy procedure for dysphagia (as an effect on a unified anatomical and physiological substrate) in order to train chewing and swallowing muscles, preserve/improve chewing and swallowing functions, prevent jaw contractures, and train bite strength [20, 126, 128, 129].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended: performing medical facial massage and medical neck massage in patients with 5q SMA in order to train chewing and swallowing muscles, preserve/improve chewing and swallowing functions, prevent jaw contractures, and train bite strength [20, 126, 128, 129].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: patients with SMA are characterized by bulbar function disorders, which share a common origin but develop through two main mechanisms—mechanical and oropharyngeal. Patients with SMA of all clinical types I-III are prone (to a greater or lesser extent) to: reduced mouth opening and jaw rigidity (decreased ability to wide/sufficiently open the mouth, provided by lower jaw movement), difficulties in moving the food bolus within the oral cavity, chewing difficulties and rapid fatigue of the chewing muscles, poor voice production quality, and swallowing problems.
Thus, earlier introduction into the individual rehabilitation program can help counteract the listed changes or improve baseline indicators and the quality of life of patients (for example, achieving the ability to eat more comfortably by mouth)—in the presence of existing abnormalities (both when choosing specific techniques and, more importantly, when combining them in the patient's individual rehabilitation program). It is also possible to supplement these methods with physical therapy methods (myostimulation) and taping.
General medical massage, medical massage of the upper and lower limbs, and medical back massage are recommended for all bedridden patients with 5q SMA to improve the condition of the muscular system and prevent neuro-orthopedic problems [20, 126, 127].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: from the perspective of the rehabilitation approach for patients with SMA, massage should not have a catabolic effect on muscles: excessive force is excluded, but reasonable exposure avoids fatigue and achieves muscle "activation" under the physician's supervision. Massage can be either stimulating or relaxing depending on the objectives (e.g., scheduling procedures throughout the day or pain relief/relaxation after intensive physical therapy). It improves blood supply, muscle nutrition, warming, fiber stretching, and proprioceptor stimulation. Along with physical therapy, massage helps achieve rehabilitation goals, including the key objective: teaching the patient to feel and use the necessary muscles in motor acts. This is especially relevant against the background of therapy with positive dynamics, when the acquisition of new motor skills is possible (within neuro-orthopedic limitations) [126, 127].
4.1.2 Technical aids for rehabilitation of non-ambulatory patients
To achieve the set rehabilitation goals, a strict adherence to the principles of postural management is employed, which includes proper positioning (in the standing position — verticalization, as well as spending time in the correct sitting position during the day) and orthotization of the trunk and limbs.
It is recommended to verticalize non-ambulatory patients with 5q SMA to prevent orthopedic complications of the underlying disease and create physiological conditions for the normal development and functioning of internal organs [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: verticalization of the patient using a standing frame is required for a total of at least 1 hour a day, depending on the child's capabilities. For patients who have never been able to sit, verticalization may be indicated starting from the age of 14 months.
Recommended rehabilitation and disability-adapted products (posterior-support standing frames with a tilt range from 90° to 180°) for non-ambulatory patients with 5q SMA to safely and comfortably accommodate and verticalize the child [96].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: standing frames must feature a functional headrest that provides lateral and anteroposterior head stabilization without restricting head movement; trunk supports at the chest and pelvic levels; lower limb fixators at the lower thirds of the thighs and knee joints; a footplate with adjustable tilt angle; and a tray. For non-ambulatory patients, it is essential to have the ability to verticalize in a standing frame in an "abducted hips" position (an additional function in standing frames), which increases the congruence of joint surfaces, promotes the development of hip joints, and prevents hip dislocations.
Recommended are limb and trunk orthoses, as well as specialized positioning devices adapted for individuals with disabilities (orthostatic support systems including rolls, molded pillows of various firmness and configurations, toys) for non-ambulatory patients with 5q SMA to provide an elevated, functional position with necessary trunk fixation and head support, and to encourage the child's motor activity [96].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: orthoses are technical rehabilitation aids used to alter the structural and functional characteristics of the neuromuscular and skeletal systems, providing, depending on medical indications, orthopedic correction, offloading, fixation, and activation of motor functions. The total time spent in orthoses is up to 8-12 hours a day. The minimum frequency of orthosis use for non-ambulatory patients is 5 times a week. Chest fixation is necessary for positional stabilization, prevention of scoliosis, and stimulation of functional activity. Neck fixation is often used to support the head to minimize the risk of suffocation in the upright position, as head control function is often absent or impaired.
Recommended are manually propelled wheelchairs with additional head and body fixation (support), including those for patients with cerebral palsy, stroller-type (for individuals and children with disabilities) for seated and non-ambulatory patients with 5q SMA to ensure general mobility [96].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: for mobility and transportation, it is necessary to use manually propelled wheelchairs with additional head and body fixation (support), indoor and stroller-type, and power wheelchairs with additional head and body fixation (support) featuring custom insert molds ("turtle shells"). These are custom-made based on a volumetric three-dimensional model of the posterior body surface, being molded inserts installed on a wheelchair wheel base of the appropriate size and purpose. When selecting a wheelchair and a functional chair, the specialist must take into account the need for additional elements to maintain the recommended posture and include this in the product recommendations. It should be ensured that the patient achieves maximum functional independence and comfort while in the wheelchair.
It is recommended to spend time in the "sitting" position for non-ambulatory patients with 5q SMA to prevent orthopedic complications of the underlying disease and create physiological conditions for the normal development and functioning of internal organs [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: for spending time in the "sitting" position, seating supports or indoor wheelchairs with additional head and body fixation (support) are used. The "sitting" position during the day is also achieved by staying in a stroller-type wheelchair. Sitting in the technical device should be performed while wearing ankle-foot orthoses. Staying in the correct "sitting" position is indicated for a total of up to 6 hours a day. Additional functions in the seating device should include: a functional headrest (Russian Medical Nomenclature: adjustable headrest) (or head positioning using a Glisson loop) that provides lateral and anteroposterior head stabilization without restricting head movement; a seat with adjustable depth, width, and tilt angle. Structurally, the seat is divided into pelvic and thigh sections, which allows for the most complete resolution of the child's balance and symmetry problems caused by secondary orthopedic complications. A height- and tilt-adjustable backrest; a trunk support (vest), a pelvic restraint belt, adjustable armrests; separate, adjustable footrests with foot fixators; a tray; an anti-decubitus cushion.
Recommended is the use of a trunk orthosis (functionally corrective corset) custom-made for the child from a cast or a three-dimensional digital trunk model obtained by volumetric scanning using Glisson loop traction of the head or in a horizontal position with the elimination of deformations, for non-ambulatory patients with 5q SMA in a sitting position to prevent the development of scoliotic spinal deformity [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the corset for patients with SMA is a functionally corrective one "with pelvic support," which preserves spinal column balance, prevents bell-shaped chest deformity, and does not impair external respiration function. A "breathing window" and a gastrostomy opening (if present) may be required. The total time spent in the corset can be up to 6-8 hours a day.
Recommended is the daily use of custom-made lower limb orthoses (e.g., ankle-foot orthoses for sitting, knee-ankle-foot orthoses for sleeping) for non-ambulatory patients with 5q SMA to prevent and slow down the process of limb joint contractures [96].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
4.2 Rehabilitation of sitting patients
For ambulatory patients, it is important to observe both the principle of dosing physical exertion and the principle of integrating physical therapy into the child's lifestyle.
One of the primary and favorite positions for such children is the "sitting" position, which, due to the main symptom of the disease (skeletal muscle weakness), the inability to independently change body position/posture (reposition themselves while sitting), and deficits in postural control, can lead to an asymmetric sitting pattern with an uneven distribution of support on the pelvic bones (right/left) with pelvic tilt (suprapelvic due to genetic scoliosis) and rapidly provoke the development of scoliotic spinal deformity. Therefore, special attention must be paid to the symmetrical development of the patients' physique and correct positioning.
Goals of rehabilitation for ambulatory patients:
increasing patient mobility;
slowing down the progression of muscle weakness, loss of function, and disuse atrophy;
improving manual dexterity;
creating conditions for the development and normal functioning of internal organs;
joint mobilization and prevention of contracture formation;
formation and maintenance of posture symmetry;
prevention of scoliotic spinal deformity and pelvic tilt;
teaching everyday living and self-care skills in the environment;
special importance in physical therapy is given to forming posture symmetry and minimizing differences in development and function between the right and left limbs.
Recommended is the use of specialized orthoses — orthopedic lower limb and trunk braces (Lower limb and trunk brace (orthosis)) for ambulatory patients with 5q SMA without contractures to maintain an upright posture and the ability to ambulate using assistive support devices [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the device is designed specifically for patients with flaccid paralysis and lower extremity muscle strength of less than 2 points. A distinctive feature of this orthosis is the ability to mechanically assist the child's efforts by reciprocally moving the lower extremities in a symmetrical posture. Such a device allows the patient to maintain an upright position and move with the support of a walker without parental assistance, provided there is sufficient arm strength. This capability has a profound impact on the child's development as an independent individual with the ability to stand upright and move in that position. The vertical posture prevents pulmonary congestion, thereby reducing the risk of complications from ARVI, and improves gastrointestinal and urinary tract passage. Axial skeletal load prevents the development of osteoporosis and secondary bone and joint deformities.
Standing should be encouraged. Supported standing time should be up to 60 minutes, with a minimum frequency of 3–5 times per week and an optimal frequency of 5–7 times per week.
Recommended are trunk orthoses—functional and corrective combined corsets (thoracolumbosacral orthoses—TLSO type) for non-ambulatory 5q SMA patients to improve posture and motor functions [96].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: static, dynamic, and functional orthoses are used for positioning and verticalization of patients. The corset is custom-made for the child based on a cast or a three-dimensional digital model of the trunk obtained via volumetric scanning using Glisson loop traction for head suspension or in a horizontal position with deformity correction. A power wheelchair with a standing function can be used for verticalization. Vertical positioning devices are important for facilitating lower extremity stretching, improving body functions and bone health, ensuring an upright posture, and improving the alignment of the spine and entire body. Proactive use of functional and corrective corsets is necessary in non-ambulatory SMA patients receiving disease-modifying drug therapy to prevent the progression of scoliotic deformity, prevent secondary chest deformities, and increase activity [97].
Recommended are orthopedic devices—lightweight lower limb and trunk orthoses, ankle-foot or knee-ankle-foot orthoses, or lower limb orthoses with a semi-corset (triple system) (with an RGO system)— for non-ambulatory 5q SMA patients with sufficient strength to facilitate standing and walking with assistance [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the minimum frequency of wearing orthoses is 5 times per week.
Recommended are adapted mobility devices (customized manual wheelchairs with additional head and body fixation/support, indoor and outdoor, as well as individually manufactured molded seating inserts based on a 3D volumetric model of the back surface of the body, mounted on a wheelchair wheel base of the appropriate size and purpose) for non-ambulatory 5q SMA patients to ensure overall mobility [96].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: when selecting wheelchairs, one should be guided by the patient's maximum functional independence and comfort in the chair; preference should be given to active-type wheelchairs and power wheelchairs.
Recommended is occupational therapy for non-ambulatory 5q SMA patients to assist the patient in daily life, and to develop and maintain daily skills [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: it is necessary to involve an occupational therapist both in the selection of the physical exercise and stretching program and for recommendations regarding social interactions, such as attending educational institutions, career choices, and participation in social activities.
Recommended: medical speech therapy procedures for dysphagia in non-ambulatory 5q SMA patients, which will be beneficial for patients of all clinical SMA types I–III (speech therapy massage techniques; exercises that help engage and train chewing and swallowing muscles, including techniques using speech therapy probes; including training of caregivers in postural techniques that facilitate swallowing) to train chewing and swallowing muscles, preserve/improve chewing and swallowing functions, prevent/prophylactic jaw contractures, and train bite strength [20, 126, 128, 129].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Recommended: performing a medical speech-therapy procedure using interactive information technology for sitting patients with 5q SMA (used in articulation improvement and speech disorder correction exercises, and can be used during articulation gymnastics) — including as methodological options when integrated with a medical speech-therapy procedure for dysphagia (as an impact on a single anatomical and physiological substrate) to train masticatory and swallowing muscles, preserve/improve chewing and swallowing functions, prevent/prophylactic jaw contractures, and train bite strength [20, 126, 128, 129].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Recommended: performing medical facial massage and medical neck massage in sitting patients with 5q SMA for the purpose of training masticatory and swallowing muscles, preserving/improving chewing and swallowing functions, preventing/prophylaxing jaw contractures, and training bite strength [20, 126, 128, 129].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: patients with SMA are characterized by bulbar function disorders, which share a common origin but develop through two main mechanisms—mechanical and oropharyngeal. Patients with SMA of all clinical types I-III are prone (to a greater or lesser extent) to: reduced mouth opening and jaw rigidity (decreased ability to wide/sufficiently open the mouth, provided by lower jaw movement), difficulties in moving the food bolus within the oral cavity, chewing difficulties and rapid fatigue of the chewing muscles, poor voice production quality, and swallowing problems.
Thus, earlier introduction into the individual rehabilitation program can help counteract the listed changes, or improve baseline parameters and patients' quality of life (for example, when achieving the ability to eat more comfortably orally) — in the presence of existing deviations (both when choosing specific methods and, more preferentially, when combining them in the patient's individual rehabilitation program). It is also possible to supplement these methods with physical therapy methods (myostimulation) and taping.
It is recommended to perform general medical massage, medical massage of the upper and lower extremities, and medical back massage for all sitting patients with 5q SMA in order to improve the state of the muscular system and prevent the development of neuroorthopedic problems [20, 126, 127].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: from the perspective of the rehabilitation approach for patients with SMA, massage should not have a catabolic effect on muscles: excessive force is excluded, but reasonable exposure avoids fatigue and achieves muscle "activation" under the physician's supervision. Massage can be either stimulating or relaxing depending on the objectives (e.g., scheduling procedures throughout the day or pain relief/relaxation after intensive physical therapy). It improves blood supply, muscle nutrition, warming, fiber stretching, and proprioceptor stimulation. Along with physical therapy, massage helps achieve rehabilitation goals, including the key objective: teaching the patient to feel and use the necessary muscles in motor acts. This is especially relevant against the background of therapy with positive dynamics, when the acquisition of new motor skills is possible (within neuro-orthopedic limitations) [126, 127].
4.3 Rehabilitation of ambulatory patients
For ambulatory patients (ambulatory stage), the priority of the principles of physical load dosing and the integration of physical therapy into the child's daily life is maintained.
Children in this group strive for active movement and walking, however, due to skeletal muscle weakness and low endurance, they frequently need rest, often adopting a defective "sitting" posture. In general, compared to sitting children, walking children are characterized by a milder course of secondary orthopedic complications (such as the development of joint contractures in the extremities and the formation of scoliotic spinal deformity) and their progression. The goals of rehabilitation for walking patients are approximately the same as for sitting patients, with the addition of the goal of increasing endurance/tolerance to physical exertion.
It is recommended to use adapted mobility aids (canines and multi-point canes, wheeled walkers and other devices that best meet the patient's needs, lower limb braces with a half-corset (triplet) (with an RGO system) (see under sitting patients)) for walking patients with 5q SMA who require additional support when walking, in order to maintain motor activity [97].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: over time, maintaining the ability to walk for patients with SMA is achieved with the help of additional support devices. When selecting additional support devices to prolong walking in patients with SMA, it is necessary to rely on the patient's current status (preserving activity and the individual's social status) rather than the predicted course, thereby offering more disabling devices for the child.
Recommended orthopedic shoes for walking patients with 5q SMA who have foot deformities, in order to facilitate motor activity [180].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Recommended the use of orthoses — ankle-foot orthoses or ankle braces together with shoes for walking patients with 5q SMA who have foot deformities, to facilitate walking [99].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Recommended the use of adapted mobility aids — active-type wheelchairs for walking patients with 5q SMA in case of limited endurance of the child or the need to travel long distances to increase the patient's mobility [100].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to use rehabilitation and disability-adapted products—seating supports that meet all requirements for proper positioning (supplemented by chest-level lateral trunk supports, a backrest tilt adjuster, height-adjustable armrests, and a footrest with a tilt angle adjustment mechanism) for ambulatory patients with 5q SMA for the prevention of scoliosis [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to use a trunk orthosis—a functionally corrective corset for ambulatory patients with 5q SMA when the spinal deformity angle, measured by the Cobb method, is 15 degrees or more, made from a plaster cast of the child's chest to maintain balance, or made from a cast or a three-dimensional digital trunk model obtained via volumetric scanning [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform general medical massage, medical massage of the upper and lower extremities, and medical back massage for all ambulatory patients with 5q SMA in order to improve the condition of the muscular system and to prevent the development of neuroorthopedic problems [20, 126, 127].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: from the perspective of the rehabilitation approach for patients with SMA, massage should not have a catabolic effect on muscles: excessive force is excluded, but reasonable exposure avoids fatigue and achieves muscle "activation" under the physician's supervision. Massage can be either stimulating or relaxing depending on the objectives (e.g., scheduling procedures throughout the day or pain relief/relaxation after intensive physical therapy). It improves blood supply, muscle nutrition, warming, fiber stretching, and proprioceptor stimulation. Along with physical therapy, massage helps achieve rehabilitation goals, including the key objective: teaching the patient to feel and use the necessary muscles in motor acts. This is especially relevant against the background of therapy with positive dynamics, when the acquisition of new motor skills is possible (within neuro-orthopedic limitations) [126, 127].
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
It is recommended to administer the drug J06BB16 #palivizumab**, intramuscularly, at a single dose of 15 mg/kg, using a regimen of 5 injections administered at 30-day intervals to all patients with 5q SMA during the first two years of life, as well as the use of a vaccine for the prevention of pneumococcal infections** and, annually, the influenza vaccine [inactivated]** for the prevention of respiratory tract infections [57, 137, 139].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the drug J06BB16 #palivizumab** is administered intramuscularly, preferably into the anterolateral thigh. Vaccination should be carried out during the seasonal surge in the incidence of respiratory syncytial virus. According to the vaccination schedule, the patient must receive the first 3 doses of the pneumococcal vaccination** before the age of one year, and the 4th dose after 12 months. All other vaccines are administered to children with 5q SMA in accordance with the National Immunization Schedule.
6. Organization of Medical Care
6.1 Indications for hospitalization:
6.1.1 Indications for elective hospitalization in a pediatric neurology department:
all patients with 5q SMA once a year for functional motor assessment, screening for complications of the disease—respiratory, skeletal-articular, and gastroenterological, as well as for rehabilitation.
all patients with 5q SMA for the administration of nusinersen**.
In international practice, nusinersen** can be administered in a day hospital setting.
all patients with 5q SMA requiring evaluation prior to surgical orthopedic intervention.
Indications for patient discharge following scheduled hospitalization in a pediatric neurology department:
fulfillment of the patient examination plan, including the assessment of respiratory disorders;
implementation of rehabilitation measures;
clear recommendations for further monitoring and treatment.
Indications for scheduled hospitalization in a pediatric surgery department:
patients with 5q SMA requiring gastrostomy;
patients with 5q SMA requiring temporary/permanent tracheostomy,
Sometimes a tracheostomy is placed due to emergency indications, and the child requires emergency hospitalization.
6.1.2 Indications for emergency hospitalization:
The development of "usual" diseases in a patient with 5q SMA (acute viral infection, bronchitis, gastroenteritis with dehydration, appendicitis, and other acute inflammatory processes), unforeseen fractures, planned surgical procedures (e.g., gastric tube placement, femoral osteotomy), but running a severe course given the specifics of the disease.
The goal of patient care in an acute situation is to normalize gas exchange by preventing atelectasis and clearing the airways. In most cases, whenever possible, these objectives should be achieved using non-invasive mechanical ventilation.
The development of severe life-threatening respiratory disorders with hypoventilation and apnea, without concomitant diseases, while the respiratory disorders require resuscitation measures; hospitalization is indicated in medical organizations that have an anesthesiology and resuscitation department or an intensive care unit (ward) in their structure and provide round-the-clock medical monitoring and treatment for children.
When executing emergency care protocols, it is necessary to contact the multidisciplinary team (neurological and pulmonological), typically including a neurologist who is aware of the disease course and potential problems of the specific patient. Oxygen in patients with SMA should be used with caution. Secondary hypoxemia due to hypoventilation can be confused with hypoxemia due to other causes, such as mucus plugging or atelectasis. Capnometry or the study of acid-base balance and blood gases will help select the correct oxygen administration mode.
6.2 Principles of organizing medical care for patients with 5q SMA
The diagnosis of SMA raises many questions for the patient's relatives and for the specialists working with such patients. Numerous problems arise upon the detection and progression of SMA, the resolution of which requires competent organization of the care process with the participation of a multidisciplinary team of specialists and compliance with the basic principles and approaches to its delivery.
These principles must be observed at any stage of medical care, both at the time of diagnosis and at any stage of patient follow-up.
The patient and their representatives must receive complete information about the disease, its course, pathogenesis, prognoses, complications, and methods of potential therapy.
The diagnosis of SMA implies the possibility of providing primary health care, specialized medical care, and palliative medical care at all stages of the disease.
Upon diagnosing SMA, the family should be referred to a specialist experienced in working with SMA patients who possesses up-to-date information on the disease course and the possibility of participating in clinical trials (of new drugs and/or medical devices). It is also important to inform families about existing public organizations working with this patient group.
A multidisciplinary team of specialists should be involved in monitoring an SMA patient, consisting of: a neurologist, a pediatrician/general practitioner, a geneticist, a respiratory support specialist (pulmonologist and/or anesthesiologist-resuscitator), a cardiologist, a traumatologist-orthopedist, a surgeon, a medical rehabilitation physician and physical therapist, a nutritionist, a gastroenterologist, as well as staff of medical organizations (and their subdivisions) providing specialized palliative medical care to children. Other specialists should be involved as specific problems arise.
The neurologist, as a specialist in neuromuscular diseases, provides primary follow-up for patients with 5q SMA. The neurologist's duties include examining and diagnosing, informing the family about the disease, drawing up a multidisciplinary follow-up plan, monitoring the patient, assessing the dynamics and degree of disease progression during regular examinations, and prescribing supportive therapy. At the stage of specialized medical care, the neurologist participates in assessing the patient's functional status (assessment using neuromuscular impairment scales in SMA). When drawing up the multidisciplinary follow-up plan, the neurologist determines the frequency of follow-up visits with other specialists of the multidisciplinary team in accordance with the patient's current condition. At each examination, the neurologist reassesses the patient's current condition and accordingly makes adjustments to the multidisciplinary follow-up plan. In their recommendations, the neurologist indicates the technical rehabilitation aids, medical equipment, orthopedic correction devices, medications, medical devices, etc. required by the patient in accordance with the identified needs of the patient.
Compliance with the principle of "early intervention," which implies the prevention of inevitably arising complications against the background of disease progression and the early use of technical rehabilitation aids, medical equipment, and other therapy methods.
Provision of patients with proximal 5q spinal muscular atrophy with medical devices intended to support the functions of human organs and systems for home use in the provision of palliative medical care in accordance with the List of such medical devices is carried out in accordance with existing legislation (clause 4, article 36 of Federal Law No. 323 "On the Fundamentals of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation"; Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 398n dated July 9, 2025, "On Approval of the List of Medical Devices Intended to Support the Functions of Human Organs and Systems Provided to a Patient in the Provision of Palliative Medical Care for Home Use").
7. Additional Information
No additional information available.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
Quality assessment criteria for primary health care
№№ | Quality criteria | Performance evaluation |
|---|---|---|
1 | Initial palliative care physician appointment (examination, consultation) performed (if palliative care is needed) | Yes/No |
2 | Initial neurologist appointment (examination, consultation) performed | Yes/No |
3 | Initial geneticist appointment (examination, consultation) performed at diagnosis establishment | Yes/No |
4 | Molecular genetic testing for SMN1 gene exon 7 and/or 8 deletions (spinal muscular atrophy) in blood performed in all patients with suspected 5q SMA to detect exon 7 or 7–8 deletions | Yes/No |
5 | SMN2 gene copy number determination performed | Yes/No |
6 | Prescription of onasemnogene abeparvovec, nusinersen**, or risdiplam** (as disease-modifying therapy, depending on medical indications and in the absence of medical contraindications) performed | Yes/No |
Quality assessment criteria for specialized medical care
№№ | Quality assessment criteria | Performance evaluation |
|---|---|---|
1 | Initial neurologist appointment (examination, consultation) and/or initial trauma and orthopedic surgeon appointment (examination, consultation) and/or initial pulmonologist appointment (examination, consultation) performed | Yes/No |
2 | Treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec, nusinersen**, or risdiplam** (as disease-modifying therapy, depending on medical indications and in the absence of medical contraindications) administered | Yes/No |
References
Show references
Brzustowicz L.M., Lehner T., Castilla et al. Genetic mapping of chronic childhood-onset spinal muscular atrophy to chromosome 5q11.2 – q13.3. // Nature. 1990. V. 344. P. 540-541.
Burglen L., Lefebvre S., Clermont O. et al. Structure and organization of the human survival motor neuron (SMN) gene. // Genomics. 1996a. V. 32. P. 479-482.
Lorson C.L., Hahnen E., Androphy E.J. et al. A single nucleotide in the SMN gene regulates splicing and is responsible for spinal muscular atrophy // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999. V. 96. P. 6307-6311.
Lefebvre S., BurglenL.,Reboullet S. et al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy-determining gene. // Cell. 1995. V.80. P. 155-165.
Harada Y., Sutomo R., Sadewa A.H. et al. Correlation between SMN2 copy number and clinical phenotype of spinal muscular atrophy: three SMN2 copies fail to rescue some patients from the disease severity // J Neurol. 2002. V. 249(9) P. 1211-1219.
Jedrzejowska M., Milewski M., Zimowski J. et al. Phenotype modifiers of spinal muscular atrophy: the number of SMN2 gene copies, deletion in the NAIP gene and probably gender influence the course of the disease // ActaBiochimicaPolonica. 2009. V. 56. P. 103-108.
Butchbach M.E.R. Copy Number Variations in the Survival Motor Neuron Genes: Implications for Spinal Muscular Atrophy and Other Neurodegenerative Diseases. // Front Mol Biosci. 2016 V. 3 P. 7.
Prior T.W., Swoboda K.J., Scott H.D. et al. Homozygous SMN1 deletions in unaffected family members and modification of the phenotype by SMN2 // Am J Med Genet. 2004. V. 130A. P. 307–310.
Tizzano E., Baiget M. Molecular bases of spinal muscular atrophy: the survival motoneuron gene // Contributions to Science. 2001. V. 2. P. 35-42.
Burghes A. H. M., Beattie C.E. Spinal muscular atrophy: why do low levels of survival motor neuron protein make motor neurons sick? // Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 V. 10(8) P. 597-609.
Rossoll W., Bassell G.J. Spinal muscular atrophy and a model for survival of motor neuron protein function in axonal ribonucleoprotein complexes. // Results Probl Cell Differ. 2009 V. 48 P. 289-326.
Calucho M., Bernal S., Alías L. et al. Correlation between SMA type and SMN2 copy number revisited: An analysis of 625 unrelated Spanish patients and a compilation of 2834 reported cases. // Neuromuscul Disord. 2018 V. 28(3) P. 208-215.
Bernal S., Alías L., Barceló M.J. et al. The c.859G>C variant in the SMN2 gene is associated with both type II and III SMA and originates from a common ancestor. // J Med Genet. 2010 V. 47(9) P. 640-2.
Hosseinibarkooie S., Peters M., Torres-Benito L. et al. The Power of Human Protective Modifiers: PLS3 and CORO1C Unravel Impaired Endocytosis in Spinal Muscular Atrophy and Rescue SMA Phenotype. // Am J Hum Genet. 2016 V. 99(3) P. 647-665.
Kaczmarek A. Analysis of reduced Neurocalcin delta (NCALD) as a protective modifier in mouse models of Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). // PhD thesis, Universität zu Köln, Köln, 2016
Janzen E., Mendoza-Ferreira N., Hosseinibarkooie S., et al. (2018). CHP1 reduction ameliorates spinal muscular atrophy pathology by restoring calcineurin activity and endocytosis. // Brain. 2018 V. 141(8) P. 2343-2361.
Zheleznyakova GY, Voisin S, Kiselev AV, Sällman Almén M, Xavier MJ, Maretina MA, Tishchenko LI, Fredriksson R, Baranov VS, Schiöth HB. Genome-wide analysis shows association of epigenetic changes in regulators of Rab and Rho GTPases with spinal muscular atrophy severity. // Eur. J.Hum. Genet. 2013 V. 21 P. 988-993.
Zheleznyakova, G. Y., Nilsson, E. K., Kiselev, A. V., Maretina, M. A., Tishchenko, L. I., Fredriksson, R., ... & Schiöth, H. B. Methylation Levels of SLC23A2 and NCOR2 Genes Correlate with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Severity. // PloS one. 2015 V. 10(3) e0121964.
Maretina M. A., Egorova A. A., Baranov V. S., Kiselev A. V. DYNC1H1 gene methylation correlates with severity of spinal muscular atrophy // Ann. Hum. Genet. 2019 V. 83(2) P. 73-81.
Mercuri E., Finkel R.S., Muntoni F., et al; SMA Care Group. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part 1: Recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, orthopedic and nutritional care. // Neuromuscul Disord. 2018 V. 28(2) P. 103-115. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.11.005
Ogino S., Leonard D.G., Rennert H. et al. Genetic risk assessment in carrier testing for spinal muscular atrophy. // Am J Med Genet. 2002, V. 110 P. 301-07.
Prior T.W., Snyder P.J., Rink B.D. et al.: Newborn and carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy. // Am J Med Genet A. 2010, V. 152A P. 1605-1607.
Zabnenkova V.V., Dadali E.L., Spiridonova M.G., et al. Spinal muscular atrophy carrier frequency in Russian Federation // ASHG 2016. P. 2476W.
Dubowitz V. Very severe spinal muscular atrophy (SMA type 0): an expanding clinical phenotype // Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 1999. V. 3(2). P. 49-51.
Pearn J.H., Wilson J. Acute Werdnig-Hoffmann disease: acute infantile spinal muscular atrophy. // Arch Dis Child. 1973 V. 48(6) P. 425–430.
Darras B.T., Markowitz J.A., Monani U.R, De Vivo D.C. Neuromuscular Disorders of Infancy, Childhood, and Adolescence (Second Edition) // Academic Press, 2015, P. 117-145
Prior T.W., Leach M.E., Finanger E. Spinal muscular atrophy // In: Adam M.P., Ardinger H.H., Pagon R.A., et al., editors. GeneReviews [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2019.
Russman B.S. Spinal muscular atrophy: clinical classification and disease heterogeneity // J Child Neurol. 2007, V. 22(8). P. 946-951.
Mellies U1, Dohna-Schwake C, Stehling F, Voit T.Sleep disordered breathing in spinal muscular atrophy. //Neuromuscul Disord. 2004 V.14(12)P.797-803.
Federal clinical guidelines (protocols) for the diagnosis and treatment of spinal muscular atrophy in children // Authors: Vlodavets D.V., Kharlamov D.A., Artemyeva S.B., Belousova E.D., 2013; 32 p. http://ulgb3.ru/doc/211218_10-58.pdf
Sproule D.M., Montes J., Montgomery M., et al. Increased fat mass and high incidence of overweight despite low body mass index in patients with spinal muscular atrophy. // Neuromuscul Disord. 2009 ,V. 19(6) P. 391–6
Chen Y.S., Shih H.H., Chen T.H. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for feeding and swallowing difficulties in spinal muscular atrophy types II and III. // J Pediatr. 2012 V. 160(3) P. 447-451.e1.
Wijngaarde C.A., Veldhoen E.S., van Eijk R.P.A., Stam M.et al. Natural History of Lung Function in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Orphanet.// J Rare Dis 2020 Apr V.10;15(1):P. 88.doi: 10.1186/s13023-020-01367-y.
Fujak A., Raab W., Schuh A. et al. Natural course of scoliosis in proximal spinal muscular atrophy type II and IIIa: descriptive clinical study with retrospective data collection of 126 patients. // BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 V. 14 P. 283.
Kouwenhoven J.W., Van Ommeren P.M., Pruijs H.E., Castelein R.M. Spinal decompensation in neuromuscular disease. // Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 V.31(7) P. E188-91.
Mazzone E1, De Sanctis R1, Fanelli L1, Bianco F1, Main M2, van den Hauwe M3, Ash M2, de Vries R4, Fagoaga Mata J5, Schaefer K6, D'Amico A7, Colia G7, Palermo C1, Scoto M2, Mayhew A8, Eagle M8, Servais L9, Vigo M5, Febrer A5, Korinthenberg R6, Jeukens M4, de Viesser M4, Totoescu A9, Voit T9, Bushby K8, Muntoni F2, Goemans N3, Bertini E7, Pane M1, Mercuri E10.Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale and Motor Function Measure-20 in non ambulant SMA patients. //Neuromuscul Disord. 2014, V.24(4) P.347-52. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
Montes J, McDermott MP, Martens WB, Dunaway S, Glanzman AM, Riley S, Quigley J, Montgomery MJ, Sproule D, Tawil R, Chung WK, Darras BT, De Vivo DC, Kaufmann P, Finkel RS; Muscle Study Group and the Pediatric Neuromuscular Clinical Research Network. Six-Minute Walk Test demonstrates motor fatigue in spinal muscular atrophy. //Neurology. 2010, V.9;74(10) P.833-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d3e308.
Glanzman AM1, Mazzone E, Main M, Pelliccioni M, Wood J, Swoboda KJ, Scott C, Pane M, Messina S, Bertini E, Mercuri E, Finkel RS. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP INTEND): test development and reliability. //Neuromuscul Disord. 2010, V.20(3) P.155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2009.11.014. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
Mazzone ES, Mayhew A, Montes J, Ramsey D, Fanelli L, Young SD, Salazar R, De Sanctis R, Pasternak A, Glanzman A, Coratti G, Civitello M, Forcina N, Gee R, Duong T, Pane M, Scoto M, Pera MC, Messina S, Tennekoon G, Day JW, Darras BT, De Vivo DC, Finkel R, Muntoni F, Mercuri E. Revised upper limb module for spinal muscular atrophy: Development of a new module. //Muscle Nerve. V. 55(6) P.869-874. doi: 10.1002/mus.25430. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
Li L., Zhou W.J., Fang P. et al. Evaluation and comparison of three assays for molecular detection of spinal muscular atrophy. //Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017, V. 1;55(3) P.358-367.
Jin Y.W., Qu Y.J., Wang H. et al. Limitation of PCR-RFLP method for the detection of genetic mutations in spinal muscular atrophy. // Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2012 V. 29(1) P. 34-7.
Yang L., Cao Y.Y., Qu Y.J. et al. Sanger sequencing for the diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy patients with survival motor neuron gene 1 compound heterozygous mutation. // Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 V. 97(6) P. 418-423
Yinhong Zhang 1 2, Jing He 1, Yunqian Zhang 3, Li Li 2 4, Xinhua Tang 1, Lei Wang 1, Jingjing Guo 1, Chanchan Jin 1, Sean Tighe 5, Yuan Zhang 5, Yingting Zhu 5, Baosheng Zhu 1 The Analysis of the Association Between the Copy Numbers of Survival Motor Neuron Gene 2 and Neuronal Apoptosis Inhibitory Protein Genes and the Clinical Phenotypes in 40 Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Observational Study Medicine (Baltimore) 2020 Jan;99(3):e18809.doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018809.
MacDonald W.K., Hamilton D., Kuhle S. SMA carrier testing: a meta-analysis of differences in test performance by ethnic group. // Prenat Diagn. 2014 V. 34(12) P. 1219-26.
Rudnik-Schöneborn S., Lützenrath S., Borkowska J. Analysis of creatine kinase activity in 504 patients with proximal spinal muscular atrophy types I-III from the point of view of progression and severity. // Eur Neurol. 1998 V. 39(3) P. 154-62.
Bersanini C1, Khirani S, Ramirez A, Lofaso F, Aubertin G, Beydon N, Mayer M, Maincent K, Boulé M, Fauroux B. Nocturnal hypoxaemia and hypercapnia in children with neuromuscular disorders. // Eur Respir J. 2012, V. 39(5) P.1206-12. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00087511. Epub 2011 Dec 1.
Ørngreen MC, Zacho M, Hebert A et al. Patients with severe muscle wasting are prone to develop hypoglycemia during fasting. // Neurology. 2003 V. 61(7) P. 997-1000.
Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I., Karwańska A. Electromyographic findings in different forms of infantile and juvenile proximal spinal muscular atrophy. // Muscle Nerve. 1986 V. 9(1) P. 37-46.
Bromberg MB1, Swoboda KJ. Motor unit number estimation in infants and children with spinal muscular atrophy.// Muscle Nerve. 2002, V.25(3) P.445-7.
Brogna, C., Cristiano, L., Verdolotti, T. et al. MRI patterns of muscle involvement in type 2 and 3 spinal muscular atrophy patients. J Neurol 267, 898–912 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-019-09646-w
Zalneraitis E.L., Halperin J.J., Grunnet M.L. et al. Muscle biopsy and the clinical course of infantile spinal muscular atrophy. // J Child Neurol. 1991 V. 6(4) P. 324-8.
Wijngaarde C. A., Blank A. C., Stam M. et al. Cardiac pathology in spinal muscular atrophy: a systematic review. // Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017 V. 12 P. 67.
Palladino A1, Passamano L, Taglia A, D'Ambrosio P, Scutifero M, Cecio MR, Picillo E, Viggiano E, Torre V, De Luca F, Nigro G, Politano L. Cardiac involvement in patients with spinal muscular atrophies. //Acta Myol. 2011, V.30(3) P.175-8.
Wasserman H.M., Hornung L.N., Stenger P.J. Rutter M.M. Low bone mineral density and fractures are highly prevalent in pediatric patients with spinal muscular atrophy regardless of disease severity. // Neuromuscul Disord. 2017 Apr; 27(4): 331–337.doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2017.01.019
Vai S., Bianchi M.L., Moroni I. et al. Bone and Spinal Muscular Atrophy. // Bone. 2015 V. 79 P. 116-20.
Chua K., Tan C.Y., Chen Z. et al. Long-term Follow-up of Pulmonary Function and Scoliosis in Patients With Duchenne's Muscular Dystrophy and Spinal Muscular Atrophy. // J Pediatr Orthop. 2016 V. 36(1) P. 63-9
Finkel R.S., Mercuri E., Meyer O.H. et al; SMA Care group. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part 2: Pulmonary and acute care; medications, supplements and immunizations; other organ systems; and ethics. // Neuromuscul Disord. 2018 V. 28(3) P. 197-207
Cherry J.J., Kobayashi D.T., Lynes M.M., et al. Assays for the identification and prioritization of drug candidates for spinal muscular atrophy. // Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2014 V. 12 P. 315–41.
Pattali R., Mou Y., Li XJ. AAV9 Vector: a Novel modality in gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. // Gene Therapy. 2019. V. 26, P 287–295
Dangouloff T., Servais L. Clinical Evidence Supporting Early Treatment Of Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Current Perspectives. // Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2019 V. P. 1153-1161.
Finkel R.S., Mercuri E., Darras B.T. et al; ENDEAR Study Group. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy. // N Engl J Med. 2017 V. 377(18) P. 1723-1732.
Servais, L.; Baranello, G.; Masson, R.; et al. FIREFISH Part 2: Efficacy and safety of risdiplam (RG7916) in infants with Type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) 2020; NEUROLOGY; Volume: 94 Issue: 15 Supplement: S Meeting Abstract: 1302http://apps.webofknowledge.com/full_record.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&qid=3&SID=C3tnfn4Grw1fI1vmPpP&page=1&doc=2
Mercuri E., Darras B.T., Chiriboga C.A., Day J.W., Campbell C., Connolly A.M., and R.S. Finkel. Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Later-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy.2018; 378 (7):625-635
Darras B.T. , Chiriboga C.A. , Iannaccone S.T., Swoboda K.J. , Montes J., Mignon L. et al. Nusinersen in later-onset spinal muscular atrophy: Long-term results from the phase 1/2 studies. Neurology; 2019 May 21;92(21):e2492-e250 doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007527.
Mercuri, E ; Barisic, N; Boespflug-Tanguy, O ; Deconinck, N ; Kostera-Pruszczyk, ; Masson, R ; Mazzone, E ; Nascimento, A ; Saito, K ; Vlodavets, D (Vlodavets, Dmitry) et al. SUNFISH Part 2: Efficacy and safety of risdiplam (RG7916) in patients with Type 2 or non-ambulant Type 3 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) Annual Meeting of the American-Academy-of-Neurology Toronto, CANADA Date: APR 25-MAY 01, 2020 NEUROLOGY Volume: 94 Issue: 15 Supplement: S Meeting Abstract: 126
De Vivo D.C., Bertini E., Swoboda K.J. et al; NURTURE Study Group. Nusinersen initiated in infants during the presymptomatic stage of spinal muscular atrophy: Interim efficacy and safety results from the Phase 2 NURTURE study. // Neuromuscul Disord. 2019 V. 29(11) P. 842-856.
Glascock J., Sampson J., Haidet-Phillips A. et al. Treatment Algorithm for Infants Diagnosed with Spinal Muscular Atrophy through Newborn Screening. // J Neuromuscul Dis. 2018 V. 5(2) P. 145-158.
Aton J., Davis R.H., Jordan K.C. et al. Vitamin D intake is inadequate in spinal muscular atrophy type I cohort: correlations with bone health. // J Child Neurol. 2014 V. 29(3), P. 374-380
Shoval H.A., Antelis E., Hillman A., et al. Onabotulinum Toxin A Injections Into the Salivary Glands for Spinal Muscle Atrophy Type I: A Prospective Case Series of 4 Patients. // Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 V. 97(12)P . 873-878.
McGeachan A.J., Mcdermott C.J.: Management of oral secretions in neurological disease. // Pract Neurol 2017 V. 17 P. 96–103
McElroy M.J., Shaner A.C., Crawford T.O., et al. Growing rods for scoliosis in spinal muscular atrophy: structural effects, complications, and hospital stays. // Spine. 2011 V. 36(16) P. 1305-1311
Fujak A, Raab W, Schuh A, Kress A, Forst R, Forst J. Operative treatment of scoliosis in proximal spinal muscular atrophy: results of 41 patients. //Arch Orthop Trauma Surg .2012, V.132(12) P.1697–706
Livingston K., Zurakowski D., Snyder B., Growing Spine Study Group, Children's Spine Study Group. Parasol rib deformity in hypotonic neuromuscular scoliosis: a new radiographical definition and a comparison of short-term treatment outcomes with VEPTR and growing rods. // Spine 2015, V. 40 (13), P. E780-E786
Barnérias C., Quijano S., Mayer M., et al. Multicentric study of medical care and practices in spinal muscular atrophy type 1 over two 10-year periods. //Arch Pediatr. 2014, V. 21(4) P. 347-54.
Durkin ET, Schroth MK, Helin M, Shaaban AF. Early laparoscopic fundoplication and gastrostomy in infants with spinal muscular atrophy type I. //J Pediatr Surg. 2008 V. 43(11) P.2031-7
Simonds A.K. Home Mechanical Ventilation: An Overview. // Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 V. 13(11) P. 2035-2044.
Moore G.E., Lindenmayer A.W., McConchie G.A., et al. Describing nutrition in spinal muscular atrophy: A systematic review. // Neuromuscul Disord. 2016 V. 26(7) P. 395-404.
Schofield C. An annotated bibliography of source material for basal metabolic rate data. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr 1985;39 (Suppl. 1):42–91].
Stoimenis D1, Spyridonidou C2, Theofanidou S3, Petridis N1, Papaioannou N1, Iasonidou C4, Kapravelos N4. Euglycemic Ketoacidosis in Spinal Muscular Atrophy. // Case Rep Pediatr. 2019 V. 27;2019:2862916. doi: 10.1155/2019/2862916. eCollection 2019.
Davis RH, Godshall BJ, Seffrood E, Marcus M, LaSalle BA, Wong B, et al. Nutritional practices at a glance: spinal muscular atrophy type I nutrition survey findings. //J Child Neurol.2014, V.29(11) P.1467–72.
Sepúlveda C., Marlin A., Yoshida T., Ullrich A. Palliative care: the World Health Organization’s global perspective. // J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002; V.24 P. 91–96
Pastrana T., Jünger S., Ostgathe C., Elsner F, Radbruch L.. A matter of definition – key elements identified in a discourse analysis of definitions of palliative care. // Palliat Med 2008 V. 22 P. 222– 232
Wang C.H., Finkel R.S., Bertini E.S., et al. Consensus statement for standard of care in spinal muscular atrophy. // J Child Neurol 2007 V. 22(8) P. 1027–49. doi:10.1177/0883073807305788
Bach J.R. Medical considerations of long-term survival of Werdnig-Hoffmann disease. // Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007 V. 86 P. 349–55.
Garcia-Salido A, de Paso-Mora M.G., Monleon-Luque M., Martino-Alba R. Palliative care in children with spinal muscular atrophy type I: what do they need? // Palliat Support Car 2015 V. 13 P. 313–17
Hull J., Aniapravan R., E.Chan et al. (2012). Guidelines for respiratory management of children with neuromuscular weakness British Thoracic Society Respiratory Management of Children with Neuromuscular Weakness Guideline Group // Thorax, 2012 V. 67 S. 1. – i1 – i40
Geevasinga N., Ryan M.M. Physician attitudes towards ventilator support for spinal muscular atrophy type1 in Australasia. // J Paediatrics Child Health, 2007; V. 43 P. 790-794.
Hardart M.K., Burns J.P., Truog R.D. Respiratory support in spinal muscular atrophy type 1: a survey of physician practices and attitudes. // Pediatrics, 2002 V. 110 P. e24.
Dybwik K., Tollali T., Nielsen E.W. et al. Why does the provision of home mechanical ventilation vary so widely? // Chronic Respir Dis, 2010 V. 7 P. 67-73.
Mah J.K., Thannhauser J.E., Kolski H. et al. Parental stress and quality of life in children with neuromuscular disease. // Pediatr Neurol, 2008 V. 39 P. 102-107.
Engel J. M., Kartin D., Carter G. T., Jensen M. P., Jaffe K. M. Pain in youths with neuromuscular disease. //American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. 2009 V.26(5) P. 405–412. doi: 10.1177/1049909109346165
Dunaway S1,2, Montes J1,2, McDermott MP3,4, Martens W3, Neisen A5, Glanzman AM6, Pasternak A7, Riley S7, Sproule D1, Chiriboga C1, Finkel R8, Tennekoon G9, Darras B7, De Vivo D1, Pandya S3Physical therapy services received by individuals with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).// J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2016; V.9(1) P.35-44. doi: 10.3233/PRM-160360.
Cunha M.C., Oliveira A.C., Labronici R.H., Gabbai A.A. Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type II (Intermediary) and III (Kugelberg-Welander). Evolution of 50 Patients With Physiotherapy and Hydrotherapy in a Swimming Pool. // Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1996 V.54(3), P.402-6. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x1996000300007.
Keefe F.J., Surwit R.S. Electromyographic biofeedback: behavioral treatment of neuromuscular disorders. // J Behav Med. 1978 V. 1(1) P. 13-24.
Kelle B., Tas D., Erkan D. Kinesio taping application in a pediatric patient with spinal muscular atrophy. // Cukurova Medical Journal. 2016 V. 41 P. 386-389.
Fujak A., Kopschina C., Forst R., et al. Use of orthoses and orthopaedic technical devices in proximal spinal muscular atrophy. Results of survey in 194 SMA patients. // Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011 V. 6(4) P. 305–11.
Demir Y.P.. Neuromuscular Diseases and Rehabilitation. // Neurological Physical Therapy, 2017, P. 176-214
Luc M, Bensoussan L, Viton JM, de Bovis VM, Collado H, Pouget J, Delarque A.J a patellar tendon-bearing orthosis and orthopaedic shoes. Gait recovery in a distal spinal muscular atrophy patient wearing a patellar tendon-bearing orthosis and orthopedic shoes//Rehabil Med. 2007, V.39(2) P.181-4. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0025.
Subasi S., Yildiz T.I., Bulut N.et al. G.P.243: Orthosis usage and ambulation levels in different clinical types of SMA. // Neuromuscul Disord 2014 V. 24(9-10) P. 889-890
Dunaway S., Montes J., O'Hagen J.et al. Independent mobility after early introduction of a power wheelchair in spinal muscular atrophy. // J Child Neurol, 2013 V. 28 (5), P. 576-582
Instructions for medical use of the medicinal product Zolgensma® Marketing Authorization LP-№(001462)-(RG-RU) https://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=7d57ab06-e2f1-4148-8a4e-5c1928ee6d99
Al-Zaidy S.A., Mendell J.R. From clinical trials to clinical practice: practical considerations for gene replacement therapy in SMA type 1. Pediatr. Neurol. 2019; 100: 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.06.007
https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-innovative-gene-therapy-treat-pediatric-patients-spinal-muscular-atrophy-rare-disease
https://www.novartis.com/news/media-releases/avexis-receives-positive-chmp-opinion-zolgensma-only-gene-therapy-spinal-muscular-atrophy-sma
Mercuri E., Muntoni F., Baranello G. et al. Onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy for symptomatic infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (STR1VE-EU): an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):832-841. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00251-9.
Mendell J.R., Al-Zaidy S., Shell R. et al. Single-Dose Gene-Replacement Therapy for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 2;377(18):1713-1722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1706198.
Day J.W., Finkel R.S., Chiriboga C.A. et al. Onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy for symptomatic infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy in patients with two copies of SMN2 (STR1VE): an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Apr;20(4):284-293. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00001-6. Epub 2021 Mar 17
Kirschner J., Butoianu N., Goemans N. et al. European ad-hoc consensus statement on gene replacement therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. Eur. J. Paediatr. Neurol. 2020; 28: 38–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2020.07.001
Strauss K. et al. Onasemnogene Abeparvovec Gene Therapy in Presymptomatic Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA): SPR1NT Study Update in Children with 2 Copies of SMN2 (4190). Neurology, April 13, 2021; 96 (15 Supplement), https://n.neurology.org/content/96/15_Supplement/4190.
Strauss K. et al. Onasemnogene Abeparvovec Gene Therapy in Presymptomatic Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA): SPR1NT Study Update in Children with 3 Copies of SMN2 (4163). Neurology, April 13, 2021; 96 (15 Supplement), https://n.neurology.org/content/96/15_Supplement/4163.
Wan, B., Feng, P., Guan, Z., et al. (2018). A severe mouse model of spinal muscular atrophy develops early systemic inflammation. Human molecular genetics, 27(23), 4061–4076. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddy300
Deguise MO, Chehade L, Kothary R. Metabolic Dysfunction in Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):5913. Published 2021 May 31. doi:10.3390/ijms22115913
Djordjevic SA, Milic-Rasic V, Brankovic V, et al. Glucose and lipid metabolism disorders in children and adolescents with spinal muscular atrophy types 2 and 3. Neuromuscul Disord. 2021;31(4):291-299. doi:10.1016/j.nmd.2021.02.002
Alves CRR, Zhang R, Johnstone AJ, et al. Serum creatinine is a biomarker of progressive denervation in spinal muscular atrophy. Neurology. 2020;94(9):e921-e931. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000008762
Nery FC, Siranosian JJ, Rosales I, et al. Impaired kidney structure and function in spinal muscular atrophy. Neurol Genet. 2019;5(5):e353. Published 2019 Aug 12. doi:10.1212/NXG.0000000000000353
Wijngaarde CA, Huisman A, Wadman RI, et al. Abnormal coagulation parameters are a common non-neuromuscular feature in patients with spinal muscular atrophy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2020; 91:212-214.
Saffari, A., Cannet, C., Blaschek, A. et al. 1H-NMR-based metabolic profiling identifies non-invasive diagnostic and predictive urinary fingerprints in 5q spinal muscular atrophy. Orphanet J Rare Dis 16, 441 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-02075-x
Zhdanova L.V., Lebedeva O.A., Kolmakova V.V., Rusinova T.A. Development of outpatient palliative care for children and adolescents in the Republic of Buryatia // Bulletin of Buryat State University. Medicine and Pharmacy. 2019. Issue 1. P. 39–43.
Minaeva N.V., Islamova R.I., Bazhenova M.I. Mobile out-patient palliative medical care for children: a two-year experience of a non-profit charitable organization // "Current Pediatrics". 2020; 19(1): 46-56.
Sokolova M.G., Nikishina O.A. Use of artificial lung ventilation in severely ill children at home // "Health as the Basis of Human Potential: Problems and Solutions". – 2013. Vol. 8, No. 1. – P. 262-263
Islamova R.I., Porkhacheva Yu.A., Minaeva N.V. Organization of respiratory support for a palliative patient with spinal muscular atrophy // "Current Issues in Pediatrics". Proceedings of the Regional Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the Memory of Professor I.P. Koryukina. Perm, 2021. - p. 71-75.
Ryabykh SO, Savin DM, Filatov EYu et al. Spinal muscular atrophy: clinical features and treatment of spinal and limb deformities. Interstate Consensus Protocol. Hir. Pozvonoc. 2020;17(2):79–94. In Russian. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14531/ss2020.2.79-94
Smith G, Bell SK, Sladky JT et al. Lumbosacral ventral spinal nerve root atrophy identified on MRI in a case of spinal muscular atrophy type II. Clin Imaging. 2019; 53:134-137. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2018.09.017
Veiga-Canuto D, Cifrián-Pérez M, Pitarch-Castellano I et al. Ultrasound-guided lumbar puncture for nusinersen administration in spinal muscular atrophy patients. Eur J Neurol. 2021;28(2):676-680. doi:10.1111/ene.14586
Gerlinger I, Szalai G, Hollódy K, Németh A. Ultrasound-guided, intraglandular injection of botulinum toxin A in children suffering from excessive salivation. J Laryngol Otol. 2007;121(10):947-951. doi:10.1017/S0022215107006949.
Cichocki P, Zyzniewska-Banaszak E, Mosiejczuk H. Strategia fizjoterapii u chorych z dysfagia z powodu rdzeniowego zaniku mieśni typu Ib. Studium przypadku [Strategy of physiotherapy in dysphagia associated with spinal muscular atrophy type Ib: Case study]. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2011;57(1):26-30.
Shaimurzin M.R., Lutsky I.S. Spinal muscular atrophies: from modern capabilities to a new care strategy. Kuban Scientific Medical Journal. 2020;27(6):80-93. https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2020-27-6-80-93
van Bruggen H.W., Wadman R.I., Bronkhorst E.M. et al. Mandibular dysfunction as a reflection of bulbar involvement in SMA type 2 and 3. Neurology. 2016 Feb 9;86(6):552-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002348. Epub 2016 Jan 13. PMID: 26764025.
Wadman R.I., van Bruggen H.W., Witkamp T.D. et al. Bulbar muscle MRI changes in patients with SMA with reduced mouth opening and dysphagia. Neurology. 2014 Sep 16;83(12):1060-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000796. Epub 2014 Aug 13. PMID: 25122201.
Lee S, Lee YJ, Kong J, et al. Short-term clinical outcomes of onasemnogene abeparvovec treatment for spinal muscular atrophy. Brain Dev. 2022;44(4):287-293. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2021.12.006
Ropars J, Peudenier S, Genot A, Barnerias C, Espil C. Multidisciplinary approach and psychosocial management of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Arch Pediatr. 2020;27(7S):7S45-7S49. doi:10.1016/S0929-693X(20)30277-3
Strauss KA, Farrar MA, Muntoni F, et al. Onasemnogene abeparvovec for presymptomatic infants with two copies of SMN2 at risk for spinal muscular atrophy type 1: the Phase III SPR1NT trial. Nat Med. 2022;28(7):1381-1389. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01866-4
Strauss KA, Farrar MA, Muntoni F, et al. Onasemnogene abeparvovec for presymptomatic infants with three copies of SMN2 at risk for spinal muscular atrophy: the Phase III SPR1NT trial. Nat Med. 2022;28(7):1390-1397. doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01867-3
De Vivo DC, Bertini E, Swoboda KJ, et al. Nusinersen initiated in infants during the presymptomatic stage of spinal muscular atrophy: Interim efficacy and safety results from the Phase 2 NURTURE study. Neuromuscul Disord. 2019;29(11):842-856. doi:10.1016/j.nmd.2019.09.007
Glascock J, Sampson J, Haidet-Phillips A, et al. Treatment Algorithm for Infants Diagnosed with Spinal Muscular Atrophy through Newborn Screening. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2018;5(2):145-158. doi:10.3233/JND-180304
Matesanz SE, Curry C, Gross B, et al. Clinical Course in a Patient With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type 0 Treated With Nusinersen and Onasemnogene Abeparvovec. J Child Neurol. 2020;35(11):717-723. doi:10.1177/0883073820928784
Axelson T, Willard A, Jain K1117 Survey of physician practice and opinions regarding the use of palivizumab as RSV prophylaxis, including in children with SMA Type 1Archives of Disease in Childhood 2022;107:A246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2022-rcpch.396
Bitetti I, Lanzara V, Margiotta G, Varone A. Onasemnogene abeparvovec gene replacement therapy for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy: a real-world observational study [published online ahead of print, 2022 May 24]. Gene Ther. 2022;10.1038/s41434-022-00341-6. doi:10.1038/s41434-022-00341-6
Sansone VA, Racca F, Ottonello G, et al. 1st Italian SMA Family Association Consensus Meeting: Management and recommendations for respiratory involvement in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) types I-III, Rome, Italy, 30-31 January 2015. Neuromuscul Disord. 2015;25(12):979-989. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2015.09.009
Mcmillan HJ et al. , Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous Onasemnogene Abeparvovec in Pediatric Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Findings from the Phase 3b SMART Study. Poster presented at MDA Congress, S110_MDA2024_SMART_Final_Data_FINAL.pdf
Yang D. et al. Safety and efficacy of gene therapy with onasemnogene abeparvovec in the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 59 (2023) 431–438.
Pascual-Morena C et al. Onasemnogene Abeparvovec in Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hum Gene Ther. 2023 Feb;34(3-4):129-138. doi: 10.1089/hum.2022.161. PMID: 36136906.
Fernandes BD et al. Efficacy and safety of onasemnogene abeparvovec for the treatment of patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1: A systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024 May 7;19(5):e0302860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302860
Kirschner J et al. 2024 update: European consensus statement on gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2024 Jul:51:73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2024.06.001. Epub 2024 Jun 8
L. Servais, R. et al. 21O RAINBOWFISH: 2-year efficacy and safety data of risdiplam in infants with presymptomatic SMA, Neuromuscular Disorders, Volume 43, Supplement 1, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2024.07.747.
https://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=48c8a000-adbe-4cdb-acf2-3c47ee497bdc
Rudolf W. van Olden et al. Adeno-associated virus serotype 9 antibodies in neonates and young children: Seroprevalence and kinetics, Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development, Volume 32, Issue 4, 2024, 101344, ISSN 2329-0501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2024.101344.
John W. Day, Richard S. Finkel, Eugenio Mercuri et al. Adeno-associated virus serotype 9 antibodies in patients screened for treatment with onasemnogene abeparvovec Molecular Therapy: Methods & Clinical Development Vol. 21 June 2021, p.76-82, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtm.2021.02.014
Belanˇci´c, A. et al. Switching from Nusinersen to Risdiplam: A Croatian Real-World Experience on Effectiveness and Safety. J. Pers. Med. 2024, 14, 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm14030244
Pane M. et al. Onasemnogene abeparvovec in spinal muscular atrophy: predictors of efficacy and safety in naïve patients with spinal muscular atrophy and following switch from other therapies. EClinicalMedicine. 2023 May 5:59:101997. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101997. eCollection 2023 May.
Weiß C. et al. Gene replacement therapy with onasemnogene abeparvovec in children with spinal muscular atrophy aged 24 months or younger and bodyweight up to 15 kg: an observational cohort studyLancet Child Adolesc Health. 2022 Jan;6(1):17-27. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(21)00287-X. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
Artemyeva S.B. et al. Consensus on gene replacement therapy for the treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (version No. 2) L.O. BADALYAN NEUROLOGICAL JOURNAL. 2023; 4(2): 64–73, https://doi.org/10.46563/2686-8997-2023-4-2-64-73
Tizzano E.F. et al. Outcomes for patients in the RESTORE registry with spinal muscular atrophy and four or more SMN2 gene copies treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec, European Journal of Paediatric Neurology, V. 53, 2024, Pages 18-24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpn.2024.08.006.
Kichula EA, Proud CM, Farrar MA et al. Expert recommendations and clinical considerations in the use of onasemnogene abeparvovec gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2021 Oct;64(4):413-427. doi: 10.1002/mus.27363. Epub 2021 Jul 20. PMID: 34196026; PMCID: PMC8518380.
Aragon-Gawinska K, Mouraux C, Dangouloff T, Servais L. Spinal Muscular Atrophy Treatment in Patients Identified by Newborn Screening-A Systematic Review. Genes (Basel). 2023 Jun 29;14(7):1377. doi: 10.3390/genes14071377. PMID: 37510282; PMCID: PMC10379202.
Cooper K, Nalbant G, Sutton A, Harnan S, Thokala P, Chilcott J, McNeill A, Bessey A. Systematic Review of Presymptomatic Treatment for Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2024 Aug 14;10(3):56. doi: 10.3390/ijns10030056. PMID: 39189228; PMCID: PMC11348213.
Powell JC, Meiling JB, Cartwright MS. A case series evaluating patient perceptions after switching from nusinersen to risdiplam for spinal muscular atrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2024 Feb;69(2):179-184. doi: 10.1002/mus.28015. Epub 2023 Dec 1. PMID: 38040488.
De Siqueira Carvalho AA, Tychon C, Servais L. Newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy - what have we learned? Expert Rev Neurother. 2023 Jul-Dec;23(11):1005-1012. doi:10.1080/14737175.2023.2252179. Epub 2023 Aug 30. PMID: 37635694.
Abiusi E et al.; Italian SMA-NBS group. Experience of a 2-year spinal muscular atrophy NBS pilot study in Italy: towards specific guidelines and standard operating procedures for the molecular diagnosis. J Med Genet. 2023 Jul;60(7):697-705. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108873. Epub 2022 Nov 22. (40% - 6 from 15 patients have signs suggestive of SMA at birth)
Schwartz O et al. Spinal Muscular Atrophy - Is Newborn Screening Too Late for Children with Two SMN2 Copies? J Neuromuscul Dis. 2022;9(3):389-396. doi: 10.3233/JND-220789. PMID: 35431259.
Lin Y et al. (2019) Newborn Screening for Spinal Muscular Atrophy in China Using DNA Mass Spectrometry. Front. Genet. 10:1255. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01255
Blaschek A., Kölbel H., Schwartz O., Köhler C., Gläser D., Eggermann K., et al. Newborn screening for SMA – can a wait-and-see strategy be responsibly justified in patients with four SMN2 copies? J. Neuromuscul. Dis. 2022; 9(5): 597–605. https://doi.org/10.3233/jnd-221510
Vill K., Schwartz O., Blaschek A., Gläser D., Nennstiel U., Wirth B., et al. Newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in Germany: clinical results after 2 years. Orphanet. J. Rare Dis. 2021; 16(1): 153. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-021-01783-8
Glascock J. et al Revised Recommendations for the Treatment of Infants Diagnosed with Spinal Muscular Atrophy Via Newborn Screening Who Have 4 Copies of SMN2 Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases 2020; 7: 97–100.
Vill K et al. SMArtCARE study group. 5qSMA: standardised retrospective natural history assessment in 268 patients with four copies of SMN2. J Neurol. 2024 May;271(5):2787-2797. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12188-5.
Reimers J. The stability of the hip in children. A radiological study of the results of muscle surgery in cerebral palsy. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 1980;184:1-100. doi: 10.3109/ort.1980.51.suppl-184.01. PMID: 6930145.
Hanna RB, Nahm N, Bent MA, Sund S, Patterson K, Schroth MK, Halanski MA. Hip Pain in Nonambulatory Children with Type-I or II Spinal Muscular Atrophy. JB JS Open Access. 2022 Sep 14;7(3):e22.00011. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00011.
Darras B.T., Masson R., Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska M., Rose K., Xiong H., Zanoteli E., Baranello G., Bruno C., Vlodavets D., Wang Y., El-Khairi M., Gerber M., Gorni K., Khwaja O., Kletzl H., Scalco R.S., Fontoura P., Servais L.; FIREFISH Working Group. Risdiplam-Treated Infants with Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy versus Historical Controls. N Engl J Med. 2021 Jul 29;385(5):427-435. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102047
Masson R., Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska M., Rose K., Servais L., Xiong H., Zanoteli E., Baranello G., Bruno C., Day J.W., Deconinck N., Klein A., Mercuri E., Vlodavets D., Wang Y., Dodman A., El-Khairi M., Gorni K., Jaber B., Kletzl H., Gaki E., Fontoura P., Darras B.T.; FIREFISH Study Group. Safety and efficacy of risdiplam in patients with type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (FIREFISH part 2): secondary analyses from an open-label trial. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Dec;21(12):1110-1119. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00339-8
Baranello G., Darras B.T., Day J.W., Deconinck N., Klein A., Masson R., Mercuri E., Rose K., El-Khairi M., Gerber M., Gorni K., Khwaja O., Kletzl H., Scalco R.S., Seabrook T., Fontoura P., Servais L.; FIREFISH Working Group. Risdiplam in Type 1 Spinal Muscular Atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 11;384(10):915-923. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2009965
Mazurkiewicz-Beldzinska M., Baranello G., Boespflug-Tanguy O., Day J.W., Deconinck N., Klein A., Masson R., Mercuri E., Rose K., Servais L., Vlodavets D., Xiong H., Zanoteli E., El-Khairi M., Gerber M., Gorni K., Kletzl H., Palfreeman L., Dodman A., Darras BT. FIREFISH Parts 1 and 2: 48-month efficacy and safety of risdiplam in Type 1 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Published date 01 July, 2023. EAN 2023. [Electronic resource]: September 18, 2024
Mazurkiewicz-Bełdzińska M., Baranello G., Boespflug-Tanguy O., Day J.W., Deconinck N., Klein A., Masson R., Mercuri E., Rose K., Servais L., Vlodavets D., Xiong H., Zanoteli E., El-Khairi M., Gaki E., Gerber M., Gorni K., Kletzl H., Palfreeman L., Darras B.T., on behalf of the FIREFISH Study Group. FIREFISH Parts 1 and 2: 5-year efficacy and safety of risdiplamin Type 1 SMA.
Mercuri E., Baranello G., Boespflug-Tanguy O., De Waele L., Goemans N., Kirschner J., Masson R., Mazzone E.S., Pechmann A., Pera M.C., Vuillerot C., Bader-Weder S., Gerber M., Gorni K., Hoffart J., Kletzl H., Martin C., McIver T., Scalco R.S., Yeung W.Y., Servais L.; SUNFISH Working Group. Risdiplam in types 2 and 3 spinal muscular atrophy: A randomised, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial followed by 24 months of treatment. Eur J Neurol. 2023 Jul;30(7):1945-1956. doi: 10.1111/ene.15499
Oskoui M., Day J.W., Deconinck N., Mazzone E.S., Nascimento A., Saito K., Vuillerot C., Baranello G., Goemans N., Kirschner J., Kostera-Pruszczyk A., Servais L., Papp G., Gorni K., Kletzl H., Martin C., McIver T., Scalco R.S., Staunton H., Yeung W.Y., Fontoura P., Mercuri E.; SUNFISH Working Group. Two-year efficacy and safety of risdiplam in patients with type 2 or non-ambulant type 3 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). J Neurol. 2023 May;270(5):2531-2546. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11560-1. Epub 2023 Feb 3. Erratum in: J Neurol. 2023 May;270(5):2547-2549. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11658-6
Day J.W., Deconinck N., Mazzone E.S., Nascimento A., Oskoui M., Saito K., Vuillerot C., Baranello G., Boespflug-Tanguy O., Goemans N.,Kirschner J., Kostera-Pruszczyk A., Servais L., Braid J., Gerber M., Gorni K., Martin C. Scalco R.S., Yeung W.Y., Mercuri E., on behalf of the SUNFISH Working Group. SUNFISH Parts 1 and 2: 3-year efficacy and safety of risdiplam in Types 2 and 3 SMA. Psentation at: 2022 MDA Clinical & Scientific Conference; March 13-16, 2022
Oskoui M., Day JW, N Deconinck, ES Mazzone, A Nascimento, K Saito, C Vuillerot, G Baranello,O Boespflug-Tanguy, N Goemans, J Kirschner,A Kostera-Pruszczyk, L Servais,J Braid, M Gerber, K Gorni, C Martin,WY Yeung, RS Scalco, E Mercuri, on behalf of the SUNFISH Study Group. SUNFISH Parts 1 and 2: 4-year efficacy and safety of risdiplam in Types 2 and 3 spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Presented at the Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA) Clinical and Scientific Conference, Dallas, TX, USA, March 19–22, 2023
Finkel R.S., Farrar M.A., Servais L., Vlodavets D.V., Zanoteli E., Al-Muhaizea M., Prufer A., Nelson L., Jaber B., Gorn K., Kletzl H., Palfreeman L., Gak E., Rabbia M., Summers D., Fontoura P., Bertini E., on behalf of the RAINBOWFISH Study Group. RAINBOWFISH: Primary efficacy and safety data in risdiplam-treated infants with presymptomatic spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Presented at the 28th International Annual Congress of the World Muscle Society (WMS), Charleston, USA; October 3-7 2023.
Finkel R., Farrar M., Vlodavet D., Zanoteli E., Al-Muhaizea M., Nelson L., Prufer A., Servais L., Wang Y., Fisher C., Gerber M., Gorni K., Kletzl H., Palfreeman L., Scalco R., Bertini E. FP.24 RAINBOWFISH: Preliminary efficacy and safety data in risdiplam-treated infants with presymptomatic spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), Neuromuscular Disorders, Volume 32, Supplement 1, 2022, Pages S85-S86, ISSN 0960-8966, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nmd.2022.07.183
Kryuchkova Tatyana Alekseevna, Balakireva Elena Aleksandrovna. "Type II spinal muscular atrophy: efficacy of risdiplam in a 7-year-old child" Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics, vol. 67, no. 3, 2022, pp. 100-106.
Ponomarenko G.N., Maltsev I.S., Koltsov A.A., Cherkashina I.V. Medical rehabilitation of patients with spinal muscular atrophy. Questions of Balneology, Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy. 2023;100(2):5–13
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Anisimova Inga Vadimovna — Geneticist, Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov, Member of the Association of Medical Geneticists, Candidate of Medical Sciences;
Artemyeva Svetlana Bronislavovna — Neurologist, Head of the Department of Psychoneurology and Epileptology, Research and Clinical Institute of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery named after Yu.E. Veltishchev, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Candidate of Medical Sciences;
Belousova Elena Dmitrievna — Neurologist, Head of the Department of Psychoneurology and Epileptology, Research and Clinical Institute of Pediatrics named after Yu.E. Veltishchev, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor;
Vlodavets Dmitry Vladimirovich — Neurologist, Leading Researcher at the Department of Psychoneurology and Epileptology, Research and Clinical Institute of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery named after Yu.E. Veltishchev, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Associate Professor at the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics named after Academician L.O. Badalyan of the Pediatric Faculty, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, President of the Association of Pediatric Neurologists in Myology "NEOMIO", Candidate of Medical Sciences;
Volsky Grigory Bolislavovich — Trauma and orthopedic surgeon, Tyumen Children's Medical Rehabilitation Center "Nadezhda", Tyumen;
Voronin Sergey Vladimirovich — Chief Physician, Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Chief freelance specialist in medical genetics of the Ministry of Health of Russia in the Far Eastern Federal District, Candidate of Medical Sciences;
Germanenko Olga Yurievna — Founder and Chairman of the Board of the SMA Families Charitable Foundation;
Groznova Olga Sergeevna — Leading Researcher at the Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Heart Rhythm Disorders, Research and Clinical Institute of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery named after Yu.E. Veltishchev, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Medical Sciences;
Guzeva Valentina Ivanovna — Neurologist, Head of the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Chief freelance specialist of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor;
Zabnenkova Viktoria Vladimirovna — Medical laboratory geneticist at the Laboratory of Molecular Genetic Diagnostics No. 3, Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov, Head of the "Genome" Shared Research Center, Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov, Candidate of Medical Sciences;
Izhevskaya Vera Leonidovna — Geneticist, Deputy Director for Science, Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov, President of the Russian Society of Medical Geneticists, Doctor of Medical Sciences;
Ilyina Elena Stepanovna — Neurologist, Head of the Pediatric Psychoneurology Department, Russian Children's Clinical Hospital, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Candidate of Medical Sciences;
Kenis Vladimir Markovich — Deputy Director, Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children's Orthopedics of the Ministry of Health of Russia, St. Petersburg, Head of the Department of Foot Pathology, Neuroorthopedics and Systemic Diseases, Member of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society and the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine, Doctor of Medical Sciences;
Kiselev Anton Vyacheslavovich — Head of the Laboratory of Molecular Genetics and Gene Therapy, Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology, St. Petersburg, Associate Member of the TREAT-NMD European Consortium, Candidate of Biological Sciences;
Kokorina Anna Aleksandrovna — Neurologist at the Children's Clinical and Diagnostic Center of the Mother and Child Clinical Hospital, Tyumen, Mother and Child Tyumen LLC;
Kolesov Sergey Vasilievich — Head of the Spine Pathology Department, National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Moscow, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor;
Komarova Oksana Nikolaevna — Pediatrician, gastroenterologist, nutritionist, Senior Researcher at the Department of Gastroenterology, Research and Clinical Institute of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery named after Yu.E. Veltishchev, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Candidate of Medical Sciences;
Kuzenkova Lyudmila Mikhailovna — Neurologist, Head of the Center for Pediatric Psychoneurology, Head of the Department of Psychoneurology and Psychosomatic Pathology, National Medical Research Center for Children's Health of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor;
Kurbatov Sergey Aleksandrovich — Neurologist, geneticist, functional diagnostics physician, Voronezh Regional Clinical Consultative and Diagnostic Center, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Voronezh;
Sergey I. Kutsev — Academician of the RAS, Director of the Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov, Chief External Expert in Medical Genetics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chairman of the Ethics Committee of the Russian Ministry of Health, President of the Association of Medical Geneticists of Russia, Doctor of Medical Sciences;
Sergey S. Leonchuk — Orthopedic Surgeon, Head of Traumatology and Orthopedics Department No. 6 of the Clinic of Neuroorthopedics and Systemic Diseases at the National Ilizarov Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Kurgan;
Polina V. Ochirova — Scientific Secretary of the Ilizarov Center, Orthopedic Surgeon at the Clinic of Spine Pathology and Rare Diseases, Department No. 9 at the National Ilizarov Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Kurgan;
Elena V. Polevichenko — Professor at the Department of Oncology, Hematology and Radiology, Pediatric Faculty, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Board Member of the Association of Professional Hospice Care Providers, Doctor of Medical Sciences;
Alexander V. Polyakov — Geneticist, Head of the DNA Diagnostics Laboratory at the Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov, Corresponding Member of the RAS, Doctor of Biological Sciences, Professor;
Dmitry A. Popkov — Higher Category Orthopedic Surgeon, Head of the Clinic of Neuroorthopedics and Systemic Diseases at the National Ilizarov Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Kurgan, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the RAS, Corresponding Member of the French Academy of Sciences;
Sofia G. Popovich — Junior Researcher at the Laboratory of Nervous Diseases, Center for Pediatric Psychoneurology at the National Medical Research Center for Children's Health of the Russian Ministry of Health;
Gennady G. Prokopiev — Anesthesiologist-Intensivist, Associate Professor at the Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Advanced Medical Training, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Leading Researcher and Head of the Department at the V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky Scientific and Practical Center for Specialized Medical Care for Children of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Candidate of Medical Sciences;
Svetlana A. Repina — Geneticist, Department of Medical Care Organization at the Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov, Candidate of Medical Sciences;
Dmitry I. Rudenko — Deputy Chief Physician, City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor;
Tatiana V. Ryabykh — Pediatrician, Head of Department – Pediatrician at "Medsi", Higher Category Physician;
Sergey O. Ryabykh — Deputy Director for Research, Head of the Department of Pediatric Traumatology and Orthopedics, Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, Professor at the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics, Medical Faculty of SPbU, Higher Category Orthopedic Surgeon, Member of the Interregional Association of Spine Surgeons, Member of the All-Russian Society of Traumatologists and Orthopedists, Doctor of Medical Sciences;
Dmitry M. Savin — Neurosurgeon, Orthopedic Surgeon, Head of Traumatology and Orthopedics Department No. 9 at the Clinic of Spine Pathology and Rare Diseases, National Ilizarov Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Kurgan;
Elena Yu. Sapego — Neurologist, Head of the Regional Center for Pediatric Palliative Medical Care at the Oblast Children's Clinical Hospital of Sverdlovsk Oblast (Sverdlovsk Oblast), Chief External Pediatric Specialist of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation for Palliative Care in the Ural Federal District;
Dmitry M. Subbotin — Researcher at the Laboratory of Neurogenetics, Geneticist at the Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov, Member of the Association of Medical Geneticists;
Vasily M. Suslov — Neurologist, Assistant Professor at the Department of Rehabilitology, Faculty of Postgraduate Education and Continuing Professional Education, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health;
Elena V. Tozliyan — Pediatric Endocrinologist, Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Candidate of Medical Sciences;
Anastasia N. Tretyakova — Higher Category Anesthesiologist-Intensivist, National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow;
Evgenia V. Uvakina — Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Nervous Diseases, Center for Pediatric Psychoneurology at the National Medical Research Center for Children's Health of the Russian Ministry of Health;
Dmitry A. Feklistov — Orthopedic Surgeon; Veltischev Research and Clinical Institute of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation;
Egor Yu. Filatov — Orthopedic Surgeon at the Clinic of Spine Pathology and Rare Diseases, National Ilizarov Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Kurgan, Candidate of Medical Sciences;
Conflict of interest:
Inga V. Anisimova | No |
Svetlana B. Artemyeva | Educational grants and lecture fees from Janssen, Roche, PTC Therapeutics concerning neuromuscular disorders. Conflict of interest resolution — has no financial interests in the mentioned companies, did not participate in writing the section "Pathogenetic Therapy". |
Elena D. Belousova | Lecture fee from Janssen-Cilag. Conflict of interest resolution — the lecture covered only SMA diagnostics. |
Dmitry V. Vlodavets | Principal Investigator in international clinical trials sponsored by F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Novartis, Biogen, NS Pharma, Sarepta Therapeutics, Pfizer. Lecture fees from PTC Therapeutics, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, R-Pharm, Novartis, Farmamondo Biomedica. Conflict of interest resolution — has no financial interests in the mentioned companies, did not participate in writing the section "Pathogenetic Therapy". |
Grigory B. Volsky | No |
Sergey V. Voronin | Lecture fees from Novartis, Janssen, Roche. Conflict of interest resolution — the lecture covered only SMA diagnostics within the framework of the Russian Scientific Society. |
Olga Yu. Germanenko | No |
Olga S. Groznova | No |
Valentina I. Guzeva | No |
Vera L. Izhevskaya | No |
Elena S. Ilyina | No |
Viktoria V. Zabnenkova | No |
Vladimir M. Kenis | No |
Anton V. Kiselev | No |
Anna A. Kokorina | No |
Sergey V. Kolesov | No |
Oksana N. Komarova | No |
Lyudmila M. Kuzenkova | Lecture fee from PTC Therapeutics, Roche, Novartis, Janssen. Conflict of interest resolution — has no financial interests in the mentioned companies, did not participate in writing the section "Pathogenetic Therapy". |
Sergey A. Kurbatov | No |
Sergey S. Leonchuk | No |
Polina V. Ochirova | No |
Elena V. Polevichenko | No |
Dmitry A. Popkov | No |
Sofia G. Popovich | Lecture fee from PTC Therapeutics, Roche, Novartis, Janssen. Conflict of interest resolution — has no financial interests in the mentioned companies, did not participate in writing the section "Pathogenetic Therapy". |
Alexander V. Polyakov | No |
Gennady G. Prokopiev | No |
Svetlana A. Repina | No |
Dmitry I. Rudenko | No |
Tatiana V. Ryabykh | No |
Sergey O. Ryabykh | No |
Dmitry M. Savin | No |
Elena Yu. Sapego | No |
Dmitry M. Subbotin | No |
Vasily M. Suslov | No |
Elena V. Tozliyan | No |
Anastasia N. Tretyakova | No |
Evgenia V. Uvakina | Lecture fee from PTC Therapeutics, Roche, Novartis, Janssen. Conflict of interest resolution — has no financial interests in the mentioned companies, did not participate in writing the section "Pathogenetic Therapy". |
Dmitry A. Feklistov | Lecture fees from PTC Therapeutics, Roche, Novartis. Conflict of interest resolution — has no financial interests in the mentioned companies, did not participate in writing the section "Pathogenetic Therapy". |
Egor Yu. Filatov | No |
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
Medical geneticist
Neurologist
Trauma and orthopedic surgeon
Neurosurgeon
Pediatrician
Anesthesiologist-resuscitologist
Gastroenterologist
Nutritionist
Pulmonologist
Pediatric Cardiologist
Physiotherapist
Medical students, residents, postgraduate students
Methods used for evidence collection/selection: electronic database searches.
Description of methods used to assess the quality and strength of evidence: the evidence base for the recommendations includes publications from the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases.
Search depth — 10 years.
Methods used to assess the quality and strength of evidence:
expert consensus;
significance assessment in accordance with the rating scale (scale attached).
Methods used for evidence analysis:
reviews of published meta-analyses;
systematic reviews with evidence tables.
Description of methods used for evidence analysis
When selecting publications as potential sources of evidence, the methodology used in each study is examined to ensure its validity. The result of this examination affects the level of evidence assigned to the publication, which in turn affects the strength of the recommendations. To minimize potential errors, each study was evaluated independently. Any discrepancies in evaluations were discussed by the full panel of authors. If consensus could not be reached, an independent expert was involved.
In these clinical guidelines, all information is ranked by the level of certainty (evidence) or LoC, depending on the quantity and quality of studies on the issue (Table 3 and Table 4).
Table 3. Scale for grading levels of evidence certainty (LEC) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)*
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies controlled by a reference standard or systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials using meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies controlled by a reference standard or individual randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except for randomized clinical trials, using meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 4. Scale for grading levels of evidence certainty (LEC) for methods of prevention, treatment, and medical rehabilitation, including those based on natural factors (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)*
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of randomized clinical trials using meta-analysis |
2 | Individual randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except for randomized clinical trials, using meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
The level of recommendation consensus (LRC) was then determined — Table 5
Table 5. Scale for grading levels of recommendation consensus (LRC) for methods of prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and medical rehabilitation, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions) *
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
C | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
* Materials for the development of clinical guidelines https://rosmedex.ru/kr/reco
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.
The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 804n dated October 13, 2017, "ON APPROVAL OF THE NOMENCLATURE OF MEDICAL SERVICES".
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 700n dated October 7, 2015, "On the nomenclature of specialties of specialists with higher medical and pharmaceutical education".
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1047n dated December 14, 2012, "On approval of the Procedure for providing medical care to children in the profile 'neurology'".
Instructions for use of the medicinal product nusinersen** dated August 19, 2019, LP-005730, available on the web portal of the State Register of Medicinal Products at: http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru/Grls_View_v2.aspx?routingGuid=53afdec7-1b35-4583-bb11-d5f7c5d2546a&t=
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms




Appendix C. Patient Information
What is spinal muscular atrophy?
Spinal muscular atrophy (hereinafter referred to as SMA) is a genetic, progressive, and sometimes fatal neuromuscular disease. Although new cases are relatively rare, many people live with SMA. SMA affects approximately 1 in 6,000 to 10,000 children and is the leading genetic cause of death in children under 2 years of age worldwide2,3. Regardless of severity, all individuals with SMA lose motor function1.
SMA is generally classified into 4 main types8:

SMA involves dysfunction or death of $\alpha$-motor neurons1. Spinal $\alpha$-motor neurons innervate skeletal muscles and are responsible for muscle contraction.

Due to the lack of a specific protein—the SMN protein—SMA leads to the death of $\alpha$-motor neurons

The SMN protein is essential for the functioning of motor neurons in the spinal cord1

In SMA, the amount of synthesized SMN protein is insufficient for neuronal survival
SMA is caused by a deletion or mutation in the SMN1 gene, which leads to reduced levels of the SMN protein4
If the SMN1 gene is non-functional, the SMN2 gene becomes the sole source of SMN protein, but it produces insufficient functional SMN protein6

How does spinal muscular atrophy manifest in a child?
Every patient with spinal muscular atrophy has individual impairments, and symptoms may vary depending on the age of onset and disease severity. Children may experience progressive weakness in proximal muscles, such as those of the shoulders, hips, and pelvis. Muscles involved in breathing and swallowing may also be affected.8
Spinal muscular atrophy does not affect neurons responsible for intelligence.9,10,11
What do you need to know about the SMN2 gene?
All patients with spinal muscular atrophy have at least one "backup gene" called SMN2. The structure of the SMN2 gene is similar to that of the SMN1 gene, but only a small fraction of the SMN protein it produces (10%) is fully functional. This amount of SMN protein is insufficient to maintain motor neuron survival.12-14
The number of SMN2 copies can vary; a higher number of SMN2 copies is associated with milder symptoms of spinal muscular atrophy.14-16
Because the disease presents with a wide variety of symptoms, it is difficult to predict severity based on the number of SMN2 copies alone. Therefore, specialists recommend considering not only the number of SMN2 copies but also the child's functional abilities when making care decisions.17
How is spinal muscular atrophy inherited?
Spinal muscular atrophy — is an autosomal recessive disorder, meaning a child is at risk of developing the disease if they inherit one mutated SMN1 gene from each parent. If a child inherits only one defective SMN1 gene, they are considered a "carrier". Carriers do not have symptoms of the disease.18
If there is a family history of spinal muscular atrophy, your chances of being a carrier are higher than average. When making family planning decisions, it is helpful to consult your physician.
How is SMA diagnosed?
A medical geneticist or neurologist may order genetic testing to confirm or rule out the disease.
To confirm the diagnosis, molecular genetic blood testing is performed. It shows whether the patient has a mutation in the SMN1 gene. In addition, the number of SMN2 gene copies needs to be determined.17
Other diagnostic tests may also be prescribed, including additional genetic testing.
A comprehensive approach to medical care, involving multidisciplinary specialists, can help improve overall health and survival17.
There are many aspects of medical care, and parents will need to make various decisions together with the doctor, as each child's symptoms manifest differently. Given that every patient with SMA has different symptoms and manifestations, team members and their degree of involvement may vary depending on needs and circumstances. Parents, as the primary members of this team, are encouraged to work closely with their child's doctor to build a care team that works best for them and their family.17
Respiratory function. Respiratory support is central to the management of patients with SMA. Due to chest muscle weakness, the ability to breathe and cough effectively may be impaired, increasing the risk of infection.20
Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) encompasses methods that prevent or delay invasive intervention. Specialized equipment, such as a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP) device, provides a continuous flow of air into the lungs via a mask covering the mouth and/or nose. A mechanical cough assist device can also be used at home.
Invasive mechanical ventilation ensures safe delivery of air into the lungs via an endotracheal tube inserted through the patient's mouth (tracheal intubation) or directly into the trachea through a small incision in the neck (tracheotomy).
Orthopedics. Scoliosis (curvature of the spine) is a common problem in children with spinal muscular atrophy due to muscle weakness. An orthopedic surgeon may recommend the use of posture support devices (orthoses) or surgical correction of scoliosis.19
Nutrition. Due to muscle weakness, children with SMA may lose the ability to chew and swallow. This creates a risk of inhaling food and liquids into the lungs during meals and developing respiratory infections. Parents and physicians may decide to place a temporary or permanent feeding tube to provide the child with necessary food and fluids.19 There are two types of feeding tubes: nasal and abdominal. Nasogastric tubes are inserted through the nose; food goes directly into the stomach. They are typically used when a tube is needed for a short period. Gastrostomy tubes are surgically placed through the abdominal wall into the stomach. They are easy to maintain and are a good option for children who require long-term feeding support.
Physical therapy. Children with SMA may be too weak to perform full ranges of motion. This creates a risk of developing contractures, which can later become permanent and limit movement. Therapeutic exercise may consist of flexibility and general functional ability exercises. In certain cases, a standing frame can help improve bone strength and may be used at home.19
In addition to the aforementioned specialists, the care team may also include other professionals, including physicians and staff from a medical organization or its structural subdivision providing specialized palliative medical care.
Important resources. There are international and Russian organizations, projects, and communities dedicated to making life easier for SMA patients and their families.
Patient organizations
SMA Europe — a European patient organization established in 2006 that unites patient and research organizations across Europe dedicated to spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).
Visit sma-europe.eu
SMA Families — a Russian patient organization, part of SMA Europe, established in 2015. It offers numerous projects for patients and their families, such as a hotline, and useful information, such as a detailed disease description and publication library. Visit f-sma.ru
Internet resources
TogetherInSMA — an international website designed to educate SMA patients and their families.
Visit togetherinsma.com
References:
CureSMA.org. Voice of the Patient Report. [Internet]: http://www.curesma.org/documents/advocacy-documents/sma-voice-of-the-patient.pdf. Accessed: January 2020.
VerhaartI EC, Robertson A, Wilson IJ, et al. Prevalence, incidence and carrier frequency of 5q-linked spinal muscular atrophy- a literature review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12(1):124.
FarrarMA, KiernanMC. The genetics of spinal muscular atrophy: progress and challenges. Neurotherapeutics. 2015;12(2):290-302.
Lefebvre S, BürglenL, Reboullet Set al. Identification and characterization of a spinal muscular atrophy- determining gene. Cell. 1995 Jan13;80(1):155-65.
Farrar MA, Park SB, Vucic S, et al. Emerging therapies and challenges in spinal muscular atrophy. Ann Neurol. 2017;81(3):355-368.
Hamilton G, Gillingwater TH. Spinal muscular atrophy: going beyond the motorneuron. Trends Mol Med. 2013;19(1):40-50.
Rubin LR. Predicting Systemic Defects in SMA. [Internet]: http://www.smafoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/SMA-Overview.pdf Accessed: January 2020.
Finke lR, et al. 209th ENMC International Workshop: Outcome Measures and Clinical Trial Readiness in Spinal Muscular Atrophy7-9 November2014, Heemskerk, The Netherlands. Neuromuscul Disord. 2015;25(7):593-602.
Cure SMA. At School. 2016. [Internet]: http://www.curesma.org/support-care/living-with-SMA/daily-life/at-school/. Accessed: January 9, 2017.
National Organization for Rare Disorders. Werdnig-Hoffmann Disease. 2012. [Internet]: https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/werdnig-hoffmann-disease/. Accessed: January 2017.
Iannaccone ST. Modern management of spinal muscular atrophy. J ChildNeurol. 2007;22(8):974-978.
Cure SMA. Cure SMA Medical Provider Information Kit. [Internet]: http://www.curesma.org/documents/support--care-documents/2016-sma-awareness-mpak.pdf. Accessed: January 2017.
Cherry JJ, et al. Identification of novel compounds that increase SMN protein levels using an improved SMN2 reporter cell assay. J Biomol Screen. 2012;17(4):481-495.
Darras BT, RoydenJones H Jr, Ryan MM, DeVivo DC, eds. Neuromuscular DisordersofInfancy, Childhood, and Adolescence: A Clinician’sApproach. 2nd Ed. London, UK: Elsevier; 2015.
Genetics Home Reference. SMN1 gene. 2012. [Internet]: https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene/SMN1. Accessed: January 2017.
Prior TW. Perspectives and diagnostic considerations in spinal muscular atrophy. Genet Med. 2010;12(3):145-152.
Wang CH, et al. Consensus statement for standard of care in spinal muscular atrophy. J Child Neurol. 2007;22(8):1027-1049.
National Organization for Rare Disorders. Spinal Muscular Atrophy. 2012. [Internet]: https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/#causes. Accessed: January 2017.
Mercuri E, Finkel RS, Muntoni F et al. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part1: Recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, orthopedic and nutritional care. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018 Feb;28(2):103-115.
Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Meyer OH et al. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part2: Pulmonary and acute care; medications, supplements and immunizations; other organ systems; and ethics. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018 Mar;28(3):197-207.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. Russian title: Key Milestones of Motor Activity (Section 2)*
* The scale is not validated in the Russian Federation; special training is required for its use.
Original title (if available): Hammersmith Infant Neurological Exam -
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Bishop KM, Montes J, Finkel RS. Motor milestone assessment of infants with spinal muscular atrophy using the Hammersmith Infant Neurological Exam - Part 2: Experience from a nusinersen clinical study. Muscle Nerve. 2018 Jan;57(1):142-146. doi: 10.1002/mus.25705. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
Type (underline): rating scale.
Purpose: general assessment of motor activity in an infant with type I SMA; can be used to assess treatment efficacy.
Content (template):


Appendix G2. Russian title: Motor Function Scale for SMA*
* The scale is not validated in the Russian Federation; special training is required for its use.
Original title (if available): The Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE).
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Pera MC, Coratti G, Forcina N, Mazzone ES, Scoto M, Montes J, Pasternak A, Mayhew A, Messina S, Sframeli M, Main M, Lofra RM, Duong T, Ramsey D, Dunaway S, Salazar R, Fanelli L, Civitello M, de Sanctis R, Antonaci L, Lapenta L, Lucibello S, Pane M, Day J, Darras BT, De Vivo DC, Muntoni F, Finkel R, Mercuri E. Content validity and clinical meaningfulness of the HFMSE in spinal muscular atrophy. BMC Neurol. 2017 Feb 23;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12883-017-0790-9.
Type (underline): rating scale.
Purpose: functional assessment of motor activity in an SMA patient; can be used to assess treatment efficacy.
Content (template):


Scoring key: Circle the highest level of current independent movements and during follow-up evaluations. Scores more clearly demonstrate positive or negative trends in motor development.
OC = limited by contracture
Appendix G3. Russian title: Revised Upper Limb Module*
* The scale is not validated in the Russian Federation; special training is required for its use.
Original title (if available): Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM).
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Mazzone ES, Mayhew A, Montes J, Ramsey D, Fanelli L, Young SD, Salazar R, De Sanctis R, Pasternak A, Glanzman A, Coratti G, Civitello M, Forcina N, Gee R, Duong T, Pane M, Scoto M, Pera MC, Messina S, Tennekoon G, Day JW, Darras BT, De Vivo DC, Finkel R, Muntoni F, Mercuri E. Revised upper limb module for spinal muscular atrophy: Development of a new module. Muscle Nerve. 2017 Jun;55(6):869-874. doi: 10.1002/mus.25430. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
Type (underline): rating scale.
Purpose: functional assessment of upper limb movements in children and adults with type II and type III SMA; can be used to assess treatment efficacy.
Content (template):

Expanded scale:




Key (interpretation): scored in points at the time of examination and subsequently over time.
Appendix G4. Russian title: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders
Original title (if available): The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Development (CHOP-INTEND).
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Glanzman AM, McDermott MP, Montes J, Martens WB, Flickinger J, Riley S, et al. Validation of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP INTEND). Pediatric Physical Therapy: The official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association. 2011;23(4):322-6.
Type (underline): rating scale.
Purpose: used to assess motor function in SMA patients who are unable to walk independently.
Content (template):





Key (interpretation): scored in points at the time of examination and subsequently over time.
Appendix G5. Russian title: 32-Item Motor Function Measure*
* The scale is not validated in the Russian Federation; special training is required for its use.
Russian title: 32-item Motor Function Measure.
Original title (if available): The 32-item Motor Function Measure (MFM-32).
Source (official developer website, validation publication): https://mfm-nmd.org
Bérard C, Payan C, Hodgkinson I, Fermanian J; MFM Collaborative Study Group. A motor function measure for neuromuscular diseases. Construction and validation study. Neuromuscul Disord. 2005 Jul;15(7):463-70. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2005.03.004
Trundell D, Le Scouiller S, Le Goff L, Gorni K, Vuillerot C (2020) Assessment of the validity and reliability of the 32-item Motor Function Measure in individuals with Type 2 or non-ambulant Type 3 spinal muscular atrophy. PLOS ONE 15(9): e0238786.
Type (underline): rating scale.
Purpose: functional assessment of motor activity in an SMA patient; can be used to assess treatment efficacy.
Content (template):





Key (interpretation): scored in points at the time of examination and subsequently over time.