List of Abbreviations
CMA – cerebral aneurysm
AVM – arteriovenous malformation
BP – blood pressure
CoW – circle of Willis
aPTT – activated partial thromboplastin time
CCB – calcium channel blockers
aSAH – aneurysmal SAH
ICH – intracerebral hematoma
IVH – intraventricular hemorrhage
ICA – internal carotid artery
ICH – intracranial hypertension
ICP – intracranial pressure
HS – hemorrhagic stroke
DC – decompressive craniectomy
PICA – posterior inferior cerebellar artery
IMV – invasive mechanical ventilation
IIPMR – individualized medical rehabilitation program
CT – computed tomography
КТА – computed tomography angiography
PSV – peak systolic velocity
IU – international units
INR – international normalized ratio
МРА – magnetic resonance angiography
MRI – magnetic resonance imaging
EVD – external ventricular drain
nICH – nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage
LMWH – low molecular weight heparin (ATC B01AB Heparin group)
UFH – unfractionated heparin (sodium heparin**)
CVA – cerebrovascular accident
ICU – intensive care unit
ICU – intensive care unit
PICS – post-intensive care syndrome
ПМА – anterior cerebral artery
ACoA – anterior communicating artery
SAH – subarachnoid hemorrhage
SBP – systolic blood pressure
СМА – middle cerebral artery
SRS – stereotactic radiosurgery
SDH – subdural hematoma
TCD – transcranial color-coded duplex sonography with monitoring
Dura – dura mater
DSA – digital subtraction angiography
CVS – cerebral vasospasm
CPP – cerebral perfusion pressure
CN – cranial nerves
HR – heart rate
GCS – Glasgow Coma Scale
ECG – electrocardiography
CBF – cerebral blood flow
CBV – cerebral blood volume
MTT – mean transit time
S-M – Spetzler-Martin scale
Terms and Definitions
Hemorrhagic stroke is a multi-etiological disease characterized by nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage.
Brain aneurysm is a localized out-pouching of an intracranial artery wall [1].
Arteriovenous malformation is a congenital pathological vascular lesion of the brain consisting of a tangle of vessels in which feeder arteries and draining veins are connected directly without an intervening capillary bed (arteriovenous fistulas) [2, 3].
Intraventricular hemorrhage is bleeding into the cerebral ventricles (including secondary rupture of blood into the ventricles during the formation of an intracerebral hematoma) [4].
Intracerebral hemorrhage (parenchymal, intracerebral hematoma) is localized bleeding from blood vessels into the brain parenchyma [5].
Subarachnoid hemorrhage is an accumulation of blood under the arachnoid mater of the brain [6].
Subdural hemorrhage (subdural hematoma) is an accumulation of extravasated blood or blood clots between the arachnoid mater and the inner surface of the dura mater [7].
Working group consists of two or more individuals of the same or different professions working collaboratively and in coordination to develop clinical practice guidelines and sharing joint responsibility for the outcomes of this work.
Level of evidence – reflects the degree of confidence that the observed effect of a medical intervention is true.
Level of recommendation confidence reflects not only the degree of certainty regarding the reliability of the intervention's effect, but also the degree of certainty that adherence to the recommendations will yield more benefit than harm in a specific clinical situation.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Hemorrhagic stroke is a multi-etiological disease characterized by nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage (NTICH).
Depending on the pattern of blood spread within the cranial cavity, the following forms of NTICH are distinguished:
subdural hemorrhage (subdural hematoma),
subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH),
intracerebral hemorrhage (parenchymal, intracerebral hematoma (ICH)),
intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH).
In some cases, NTICH can be mixed (subarachnoid-parenchymal, parenchymal-ventricular, etc.) [8].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Causes of NTICH include various diseases and pathological conditions of the cerebral vascular system that can lead to arterial wall rupture.
The most frequent cause of so-called "spontaneous" NTICH is arterial hypertension (hypertensive NTICH), which leads to hypertensive angiopathy—vascular wall changes manifested by over-stretching, thinning, fibrinoid necrosis, miliary aneurysm formation, and dissection [9]. The arteries supplying the deep structures of the cerebral hemispheres are most commonly affected, and hemorrhages result in deep ICH formation. The second most common cause of cerebral artery rupture is amyloid angiopathy, which predominantly affects cortical arteries, with ICH localizing in the subcortical and cortical regions of the hemispheres.
NTICH may develop in various cerebrovascular diseases:
brain aneurysms (BA),
arteriovenous malformations (AVMs),
cavernous malformations (CMs),
dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs),
moyamoya disease.
BAs are circumscribed dilations of cerebral arteries. They are classified as multifactorial diseases. Etiological factors include genetic factors leading to vascular wall alterations, as well as external triggers such as arterial hypertension, atherosclerosis, smoking, infection (mycotic aneurysms), etc. [10–18]. The role of genetic factors is most clearly evident in familial forms of the disease (7–20%) and the association of BAs with genetically determined connective tissue disorders (autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, etc.). BAs most typically manifest as SAH—aneurysmal SAH (aSAH) (90%), but ICH (up to 40%) and IVH (up to 20%) can also occur. The mechanism of hemorrhage is the rupture of the pathologically altered aneurysm wall.
AVMs are congenital vascular lesions consisting of a tangle of vessels in which feeder arteries and draining veins are connected directly without an intervening capillary bed (arteriovenous fistulas). AVMs result from impaired angiogenesis. In extremely rare cases, AVMs may form postnatally in the presence of pre-existing arteriovenous fistulas or venous thrombosis [2, 3]. In recent years, AVM development has been linked to mutations in various genes, though these are non-specific [19, 20]. AVMs are associated with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (Osler-Weber-Rendu disease), in which they are detected 10 times more frequently than in the general population [21, 22]. AVMs typically present with hemorrhage forming an ICH, which is combined with SAH in 50% of cases and with IVH in 50% (mixed hemorrhages). The primary mechanism of hemorrhage is the rupture of arteries subjected to high pressure within the malformation's arteriovenous shunts.
Causes of NTICH can also include dural sinus and cerebral vein thrombosis, thrombophilia, coagulopathies, vasculitis, and vasculopathies. Hemorrhage may occur during anticoagulant therapy (ATC code B01A Antithrombotic agents), thrombolytic therapy, or eclampsia. Special forms of ICH include hemorrhage into a tumor and hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic stroke via diapedesis.
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
Hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (hypertensive ICH) accounts for 10–15% of all stroke cases. In the Russian Federation (RF), approximately 40,000 hypertensive ICH cases are diagnosed annually. The mean patient age is 60–65 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.6:1. The risk of occurrence increases significantly after age 55 and doubles with each subsequent decade. Mortality reaches 40–50%, and disability develops in 70–75% of survivors. Risk factors include high blood pressure, alcohol abuse, a history of prior cerebrovascular events, and liver dysfunction accompanied by thrombocytopenia, hyperfibrinolysis, and reduced coagulation factors [8, 23, 24].
Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) accounts for 2–5% of all strokes, which corresponds to 10,000–15,000 patients per year in the RF. This figure should be distinguished from the significantly higher prevalence of BAs in the general population, which averages 2.8%. aSAH occurs most frequently between the ages of 30 and 50 years. Children account for about 3%, and elderly and senile patients for 8%. BAs are 1.5 times more common in women. aSAH carries a high risk of mortality (up to 60% if untreated) and disability (up to 30% of survivors) [25–27].
Hemorrhages from AVMs account for 1–2% of all strokes, with an estimated population prevalence of AVMs of 0.015%–0.14% [28, 29]. The disease typically manifests between 20 and 40 years of age [30]. The annual hemorrhage risk is 2–4% [31]. In patients who have suffered a hemorrhage, this risk accumulates over time, reaching 45% at 20 years. The risk of bleeding increases with deep AVM location, venous drainage into deep cerebral veins, and a history of prior hemorrhage. In the absence of these factors, the annual risk of malformation rupture is 0.9%, rising to up to 34% when they are combined [32]. The mortality rate following AVM hemorrhage averages approximately 20%. Aneurysms associated with AVMs—intranidal and on feeder vessels (proximal and distal)—are detected in 14% of AVM patients [33, 34]. Such aneurysms are the established cause of hemorrhage in 16% of AVM cases [35]. The risk of hemorrhage increases as the size of the associated aneurysms grows [36].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
I60 – Subarachnoid hemorrhage
I60.0 – Subarachnoid hemorrhage from carotid siphon and bifurcation
I60.1 – Subarachnoid hemorrhage from middle cerebral artery
I60.2 – Subarachnoid hemorrhage from anterior communicating artery
I60.3 – Subarachnoid hemorrhage from posterior communicating artery
I60.4 – Subarachnoid hemorrhage from basilar artery
I60.5 – Subarachnoid hemorrhage from vertebral artery
I60.6 – Subarachnoid hemorrhage from other intracranial arteries
I60.7 – Subarachnoid hemorrhage from intracranial artery, unspecified
I60.8 – Other subarachnoid hemorrhage
I60.9 – Subarachnoid hemorrhage, unspecified
I61 – Intracerebral hemorrhage
I61.0 – Intracerebral hemorrhage in hemisphere, subcortical
I61.1 – Intracerebral hemorrhage in hemisphere, cortical
I61.2 – Intracerebral hemorrhage in hemisphere, unspecified
I61.3 – Intracerebral hemorrhage in brain stem
I61.4 – Intracerebral hemorrhage in cerebellum
I61.5 – Intraventricular intracerebral hemorrhage
I61.6 – Intracerebral hemorrhage of multiple localizations
I61.8 – Other intracerebral hemorrhage
I61.9 – Intracerebral hemorrhage, unspecified
I62 – Other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage
I62.0 – Subdural hemorrhage (acute) (nontraumatic)
I62.1 – Nontraumatic extradural hemorrhage
Nontraumatic epidural hemorrhage
I62.9 – Intracranial hemorrhage (nontraumatic), unspecified
Q28.2 – Arteriovenous malformation of cerebral vessels
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
Classification of hypertensive ICH
- by localization (5 variants) [37]:
Lobar – localized in a single brain lobe.
Lateral, or putaminal – hemorrhages into the subcortical structures of the cerebral hemisphere, lateral to the internal capsule. This is the most frequent type of hemorrhage.
Medial, or thalamic – the hematoma is located medial to the internal capsule.
Mixed – as a rule, massive hemorrhages in which the hematoma extends to multiple anatomical structures.
Hemorrhages in the posterior cranial fossa. ICH can form in the cerebellar hemispheres and in the brain stem, where localization at the pontine level is most typical.
Up to 90% of hemorrhages are localized in the cerebral hemispheres, with an approximately equal distribution of frequency among variants 1–4. In the posterior cranial fossa, ICH most frequently forms in the cerebellar hemispheres.
- by volume [38, 39]:
small – up to 20–30 ml,
moderate – from 30 to 50–60 ml,
large – over 60 ml.
The volume of ICH is of crucial importance for determining management strategy and predicting outcomes.
Classification of SAH
- by periods (three main ones) [40]:
Acute period – 14 days from the last SAH (the period during which patient deterioration most commonly occurs due to brain edema, vasospasm, and ischemia). This period includes the ultra-acute period (0–72 hours), when the patient's clinical manifestations are directly caused by the hemorrhage itself (prior to the onset of vasospasm).
Subacute period – 15–31 days from the last SAH (the period during which the main complications of SAH regress).
Cold period – 1 month or more from the SAH (the period when residual deficits related to the prior SAH may persist).
Classification of aneurysms [41–43]:
- by location: bifurcation and trunk cerebral aneurysms.
- by shape: saccular (about 90% of cerebral aneurysms, single- or multi-chambered) and fusiform.
- by number of cerebral aneurysms: single (80%) and multiple (20%).
- by size: miliary aneurysms (up to 2 mm inclusive), medium-sized (3–14 mm), large (15–24 mm), and giant cerebral aneurysms (25 mm and more).
90% of cerebral aneurysms are located in the anterior circulation of the brain, and 10% in the posterior circulation (vertebrobasilar system).
Classifications of arteriovenous malformations
About two dozen classifications have been proposed for evaluating AVMs. The most popular is the Spetzler-Martin (S-M) scale, named after the authors who proposed it in 1986 [44]. The scale is based on the evaluation of three AVM characteristics determined by angiography and head CT/MRI: 1) size, 2) location relative to eloquent cortex (sensorimotor, speech, and visual cortex, thalamus and hypothalamus, brainstem, and cerebellar nuclei), and 3) the pattern of venous drainage of the brain (Appendix G10). Based on the point score, five grades of surgical risk are distinguished.
Grade I–II (1–2 points) – low risk of neurological deficit, surgery is recommended;
Grade III (3 points) – moderate risk, surgery based on individual indications;
Grade IV–V (4–5 points) – high risk, conservative management is advisable.
Two modifications of this scale have also been proposed: the Spetzler-Ponce scale (Appendix G11), which divides patients into three risk categories [45], and the Lawton-Young scale, which M. Lawton developed based on the original S-M scale by adding three additional factors influencing treatment outcomes: age, history of hemorrhage from the AVM, and compactness of the AVM structure [46, 47] (Appendix G13). This scale has the highest prognostic accuracy. At a score of 6 points and above, the risk of disabling deficit or death from surgery is 39–63% [48].
For radiosurgical treatment of AVMs, the Radiosurgery Based AVM Score [49,50] (Appendix G15) and the Virginia Radiosurgery AVM Scale [51] (Appendix G14) are used.
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
1.6.1 Clinical manifestations of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma
Clinical manifestations and the course of hypertensive ICH vary depending on its location, size, and rate of development [52]. Symptoms typically develop suddenly, usually during the day, amid physical exertion or emotional stress, but most commonly during routine daily activities. Neurological symptoms generally worsen over the course of several minutes or hours before and during hospitalization, reflecting early hematoma expansion or increasing brain edema [53]. A more frequent presentation is the gradual, smooth progression of symptoms over minutes and occasionally hours; a less frequent presentation is the abrupt onset of symptoms with a depressed level of consciousness within a few seconds. General cerebral symptoms are predominant; however, in elderly patients and/or with small hematomas confined to the cerebral white matter, general cerebral and meningeal symptoms may be mild or absent.
Decreased level of consciousness (about 50% of cases)
In extensive hemorrhages, the level of consciousness frequently decreases due to elevated intracranial pressure and compression of the thalamus and brainstem. As the hematoma volume increases, the level of consciousness drops to coma and death due to elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and compression of brainstem centers.
Nausea and vomiting (40–50%)
Vomiting is a typical sign of ICH caused by increased intracranial pressure and distortion of brain structures. Vomiting is observed in approximately 50% of patients with lobar ICH and occurs even more frequently in patients with cerebellar hemorrhages. In patients with cerebellar hematomas, vomiting almost always occurs in the early stages of the clinical course.
Headache (about 40%)
Hemorrhage directly into the brain parenchyma, without involving the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space, is painless. Therefore, headache is not a mandatory symptom of ICH. Headache is more common in patients with large hematomas and is associated with meningeal traction, elevated intracranial pressure, and the presence of blood in the cerebrospinal fluid. Patients with small deep hematomas often experience no headache throughout the entire course of the disease. Headache may be the sole manifestation of hemorrhage in the region of the caudate nucleus, which is typically accompanied by intraventricular hemorrhage.
Seizures (up to 10%)
Seizures are observed in approximately 10% of patients with ICH and in about 50% of patients with lobar hematomas. Seizures typically occur at the onset of ICH or within the first 24 hours [54].
Focal neurological symptoms
About 40% of hypertensive ICHs occur in the basal ganglia, 30% in the thalamus, 20% are lobar, and about 10% occur in the cerebellum and pons [55]. The corpus striatum (caudate nucleus and putamen) is the most common site of origin for hypertensive ICH. With this location, hematoma formation causes deep contralateral hemiparesis and hemisensory disturbance, whereas thalamic hemorrhage is accompanied by more pronounced sensory deficits than motor deficits. Lobar hemorrhages may be accompanied by cortical dysfunction such as aphasia, neglect, body schema disorders, anosognosia, and hemianopia. As the hematoma increases in size, conjugate eye deviation toward the ICH may join (gaze palsy in the direction opposite to the hematoma). Oculomotor disorders, such as upward gaze palsy, convergence paralysis, unreactive constricted pupils, other cranial nerve palsies, and alternating syndromes, suggest a brainstem localization. In some cases, brainstem ICH immediately leads to coma and vital function disorders. Cerebellar hemorrhages are characterized by severe dizziness, nystagmus, sharp occipital pain, and ataxia. When a cerebellar ICH is of significant volume, direct compression of the brainstem occurs with involvement of brainstem nerves and pathways, impaired respiration and hemodynamics, or obstructive hydrocephalus with the development of tentorial herniation syndrome.
Meningeal signs in the first hours are predominantly represented by photophobia and Bekhterev's zygomatic sign. Later, nuchal rigidity, Kernig's, and Brudzinski's signs appear. In elderly patients, meningeal irritation is absent in 1/3 of cases.
Blood breakthrough into the ventricular system (isolated IVH or ICH breakthrough) occurs in half of the patients. IVH is characterized by hyperthermia and hypersalivation. Occlusion of the cerebrospinal fluid pathways is accompanied by the development of occlusive-hypertensive syndrome; massive IVH leads to impaired wakefulness, hormotonia, muscle hypotonia, respiratory and hemodynamic disorders.
Herniation syndrome develops with a significant volume of ICH, most often of temporal localization, and is accompanied by impaired wakefulness, anisocoria with mydriasis on the affected side, transition from hemispheric gaze palsy to brainstem palsy, respiratory and cardiovascular disorders [56].
1.6.2 Clinical manifestations of subarachnoid hemorrhage
Typical (70%) and atypical (30%) manifestations of SAH are distinguished.
In a typical onset of the disease, the main clinical symptom of SAH is a sudden, severe headache ("thunderclap headache"), which patients describe as "the worst headache of my life." Often, the headache is accompanied by vomiting, photophobia, short-term or prolonged loss of consciousness. Blood pressure is usually elevated. Initially, meningeal signs are associated with the spread of blood into the ventricular system. As the spilled blood spreads to the spinal cord level, neck pain and nuchal rigidity occur.
General cerebral and/or focal neurological deficits are found in more than 25% of patients. Depression of consciousness and confusion may be noted; patients with severe subarachnoid hemorrhage often present in a coma. Motor neurological deficits occur in 10-15% of patients, usually due to middle cerebral artery aneurysms. A characteristic sign of a supraclinoid ICA aneurysm is cranial nerve III palsy (ptosis, mydriasis). Increased intracranial pressure after rupture can cause abducens nerve palsy due to its compression. In some patients, the onset of SAH is accompanied by a seizure [57].
In 30% of patients with cerebral aneurysm ruptures, a masked or atypical clinical picture of SAH is observed (pseudomigraine, pseudohypertensive, pseudoinflammatory, pseudopsychotic, pseudotoxic, and pseudoradicular forms). In 40% of patients, no neurological symptoms are observed upon examination.
Approximately half of the patients show a mild or moderate increase in blood pressure.
1.6.3 Clinical manifestations of AVM rupture
AVM rupture in 97% of patients is accompanied by the development of general cerebral syndrome. Meningeal syndrome is observed in 88%: in 60% it is moderately pronounced, in 28% – severe. In 42% of patients with AVM rupture, consciousness is clear, in 44% there is a disturbance in the level of wakefulness to lethargy, in 14% – to stupor and coma. Limb muscle paresis is observed in 53%, plegia – in 21% [58].
Focal neurological deficits and depression of consciousness in hemorrhage from an AVM occur less frequently than in hemorrhage from aneurysms or ICH. This is due to the fact that ICH upon malformation rupture usually does not extend to the internal capsule, does not always have a large size, the course of the disease is rarely complicated by the development of vasospasm, and rupture of deep efferents often leads to isolated ventricular hemorrhages. In addition, the hematoma near the AVM core often pushes the brain parenchyma apart and does not damage its pathways. Patients with AVM rupture are younger, which contributes to their recovery [31, 59].
Focal neurological deficits develop more frequently in the presence of ICH (52%), less frequently – with isolated SAH (41%), and even less frequently – with isolated IVH (28%) [31].
In 28%, hemorrhage from an AVM clinically manifests only as general cerebral and meningeal syndromes without focal neurological deficits. Such a clinical picture requires differentiation from a cerebral aneurysm rupture. Evidence in favor of malformation rupture in such patients is the lesser severity of the meningeal syndrome (moderately pronounced in 65%), and in 20% of patients, changes in muscle tone, anisoreflexia, and the presence of pathological reflexes can be detected [58].
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
The criteria for diagnosing hemorrhagic stroke are:
1) clinical data (acute development of general cerebral/focal symptoms),
2) CT/MRI data (detection of blood).
Based on the examination results, decisions on further management tactics are made [60].
The main diagnostic tasks in patients with hemorrhagic stroke are: establishing the cause of the hemorrhage, determining the localization and volume of the hemorrhage and the accompanying state of the brain (edema, herniation, secondary damage foci), and determining the severity of the patient's condition.
The diagnostic algorithm includes:
1) collection of complaints and anamnesis,
2) physical examination,
3) laboratory tests,
4) instrumental examinations.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by a neurologist for all patients with hemorrhagic stroke in order to determine the level of impaired consciousness and identify focal neurological symptoms [60].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform a consultation (examination) by a neurosurgeon no later than 60 minutes from the moment of receiving the results of computed tomography for a patient who, according to the conclusion of computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, has signs of hemorrhagic stroke in order to determine indications for surgery and choose the surgical method [60].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: the consultation is carried out no later than 60 minutes1 from the moment of receiving the computed tomography results in a patient whose computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging findings establish signs of hemorrhagic stroke.
1 Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 203n dated April 14, 2025 "On approval of criteria for assessing the quality of medical care"; (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of Russia on May 28, 2025, No. 82382); (http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202505290045); entered into force on 01.09.2025
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
Complaints and medical history are described in the section "Clinical Presentation".
Patients with hemorrhagic stroke, if capable of verbal contact, usually complain of headache, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, as well as impaired functions corresponding to the brain lesion site (limb weakness, speech impairment, sensory disturbances, double vision, visual impairment, etc.). Anamnestically, it is established that the disease developed acutely against the background of elevated blood pressure. In the majority of patients, hemorrhage is preceded by long-standing, untreated arterial hypertension, urolithiasis, obesity, and diabetes mellitus.
It is recommended to take the anamnesis and complaints in central nervous system and brain pathology, with entering the assessment results into medical documentation, for all patients with hemorrhagic stroke to perform differential diagnosis [60].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: when taking the anamnesis and complaints, it is necessary to pay attention to the timing and acuteness of symptom onset;
in a patient with an unclear history and impaired consciousness, traumatic brain injury and polytrauma should be ruled out [60].
2.2 Physical Examination
Physical examination findings are described in the "Clinical Presentation" section.
During a general examination, the level of consciousness, severity of the condition, and functions of vital organs and systems are assessed.
During a neurological examination, the presence of meningeal and focal symptoms (cranial nerve, cerebral hemisphere, and brainstem lesions) is assessed.
It is recommended to perform a general examination, standard assessment of the severity of the condition and level of consciousness for all patients with hemorrhagic stroke for differential diagnosis and determination of the etiology of the disease [61].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform a visual examination in central nervous system and brain pathology, palpation in central nervous system and brain pathology, examination of the sensory and motor spheres in central nervous system and brain pathology (neurological status assessment) with entering the assessment results into medical documentation for all patients with hemorrhagic stroke to perform differential diagnosis and determine the etiology of the disease [60].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform assessment using scales: Glasgow Coma Scale, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Canadian Neurological Scale, Hunt-Hess scale, WFNS scale, modified Rankin scale in patients with hemorrhagic stroke depending on its etiology to assess the severity of the condition [62–67].
GCR CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) – see Appendix G4,
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) – see Appendix G17,
Canadian Neurological Scale – see Appendix G18,
Hunt-Hess scale – see Appendix G1,
WFNS scale – see Appendix G5,
modified Rankin scale – see Appendix G9.
It is recommended to assess swallowing competence using a swallowing test (the "three-swallow test" using a pulse oximeter) during the first 3 hours of the patient's stay in the hospital to detect early signs of dysphagia in order to reduce the risk of aspiration [68].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Dysphagia is a frequent manifestation of stroke, which is a risk factor for aspiration pneumonia and is associated with higher mortality [69, 70]. Early screening for dysphagia in adult patients presenting with acute stroke reduces the risks of pneumonia, death, dependency on assistance, and prolonged hospital stay [68, 70].
Dysphagia assessment should be performed before the patient is given food or oral medications in the ICU.
Swallowing screening test (see Appendix G20).
If swallowing function testing is impossible or dysphagia is identified, placement of a nasogastric tube is indicated for nutritional support.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
A patient with hemorrhagic stroke must undergo a number of laboratory tests, including a complete (clinical) blood count [71, 72], a general (clinical) urinalysis [73], a general general-medical blood biochemistry test [74], a coagulogram (exploratory study of the hemostatic system) [75], and a platelet aggregation study (if there is a history of antiplatelet drug use, except for heparin) [76, 77].
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive complete (clinical) blood count in all patients with hemorrhagic stroke to assess the severity of their condition [71, 72].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
Comments: assessment of platelet count and mean platelet volume has prognostic value.
It is recommended to perform a general (clinical) urinalysis in all patients with hemorrhagic stroke as part of general medical screening to detect signs of renal and urinary tract dysfunction [73].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform a general general-medical blood biochemistry test in all patients with hemorrhagic stroke as part of general medical screening to identify signs of electrolyte and metabolic disorders, as well as inflammatory markers [74].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform a coagulogram (exploratory study of the hemostatic system) in all patients with hemorrhagic stroke to prevent secondary hemorrhagic complications [75].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: changes in the blood coagulation system towards hypocoagulation can be caused both by the disease (blood pathology, liver pathology, etc.) and by medications.
It is recommended to perform a platelet aggregation study in patients with hemorrhagic stroke if there is a history of antiplatelet therapy, excluding heparin [76, 77].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
It is recommended to perform computed tomography (CT) of the brain or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain no later than 40 minutes from the moment of admission to the hospital in all patients with hemorrhagic stroke to clarify the location and volume of intracranial hemorrhage [78–81].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments:
The study must be performed within the first 40 minutes from the moment of hospitalization2.
The volume of hemorrhage is determined either using the software supplied by the CT scanner manufacturer or by the ABC/2 formula, where A is the largest diameter, B is the perpendicular diameter to A, and C is the number of slices multiplied by the slice thickness. Patients in whom neuronavigation is planned to be used during surgery also undergo scanning in the mode required for subsequent image transfer to a specific navigation station [82, 83].
When performing CT (MRI), the following should be determined:
presence and topographic location of the pathological lesion(s);
volume of each type of lesion (hypo- and hyperdense parts);
position of the midline brain structures and the degree of their displacement in mm;
state of the cerebrospinal fluid-containing system of the brain (size, shape, position, deformation of the ventricles) with determination of ventriculocranial coefficients;
state of the brain cisterns;
state of the cerebral sulci and fissures.
The severity of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is assessed according to the Fisher scale (see Appendix G2) and/or the Hijdra scale (see Appendix G6). If concomitant intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is present, the Graeb scale is used (see Appendix G3).
It is recommended to perform an examination of the scalp for injuries and evaluate the existing head CT scan in bone window settings in patients with a depressed level of consciousness, lack of medical history data, and an isolated subdural hematoma to rule out skull fractures [84].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: subdural hematoma may be due to head trauma for which there is no information
It is recommended to perform a lumbar puncture in a patient with symptoms of hemorrhagic stroke if computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain is not available, in order to detect blood in the cerebrospinal fluid [85].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: if there are clinical and/or instrumental signs of brain herniation, lumbar puncture is contraindicated.
It is recommended to perform computed tomography angiography (CTA), magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to identify the source of hemorrhage in case of suspected aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation based on brain CT and/or brain MRI data in order to identify the source of bleeding [86–89].
GGR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: one of the listed types of angiography is performed. CTA for suspected non-traumatic hemorrhage should be performed from the aortic arch, including the main arteries of the head and neck, in the arterial and venous phases to rule out all types of vascular malformations and assess access to them. The sensitivity of CTA in detecting AVMs and aneurysms in the setting of hemorrhage is 84–100% with a specificity of 77–100% [90]. When performing CTA in patients with hemorrhagic stroke, the "spot sign" is often observed, caused by contrast medium extravasation. When CTA is performed within the first 3 hours from disease onset, the probability of this sign is 66%, decreasing to 13% after 6 hours [23]. The "spot sign" is a sign of increasing intracerebral hemorrhage volume and worsens disease outcome [91].
It is recommended to perform computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or cerebral angiography to identify the source of hemorrhage in patients with hemorrhagic stroke younger than 45 years without a history of hypertension to identify the source of hemorrhage [86–89].
GGR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: one of the listed types of angiography is performed.
It is recommended to perform delayed computed tomography angiography of the cerebral vessels a few minutes after contrast administration in patients with the "spot sign" on cerebral CT angiography to differentiate between an arteriovenous malformation and an aneurysm [23].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: in the case of the "spot sign", its configuration and density change due to the mixing of the contrast medium with the hematoma during the follow-up scan. In AVMs and aneurysms, this does not happen; their density corresponds to the density of adjacent normal arteries on both scans.
It is recommended to perform total selective cerebral angiography if brain CT or MRI data are insufficiently informative, in order to clarify the anatomical and topographical characteristics of the aneurysm and identify the source of hemorrhage [92].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform a hemorrhage assessment using the SICH score in all patients with hypertensive ICH to determine the need for contrast-enhanced neuroimaging (CT angiography of cerebral vessels, total selective cerebral angiography) [93].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments:
The hemorrhage assessment using the SICH (secondary intracerebral hemorrhage score) was proposed by Almandoz J.E.D. et al. in 2010 (see Appendix G12) [93].
Risk factors for identifying vascular pathology in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage include: anatomical shape of the hemorrhage according to native CT data, young patient age, female sex, absence of arterial hypertension and coagulation disorders (see Appendix G12). When assessed using the SICH score at 0–2 points, the probability of vascular pathology is 3%, and at 3 points or more, it is 34%.
Malformations may not be detected on angiography due to their small size and compression by the hematoma [94, 95].
If no AVM is found on initial CTA or DSA, it is advisable to perform repeat CTA or DSA after resorption of the ICH to detect the malformation.
Angiographic risk factors for AVM rupture include stenosis and varicosity of efferent veins, exclusively deep venous drainage, a single efferent vein, venous reflux, and extra- and intranidal aneurysms [32, 96–98].
2 Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 203n dated April 14, 2025 "On Approval of Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Medical Care" (Registered with the Russian Ministry of Justice on May 28, 2025, No. 82382); (http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202505290045); entered into force on September 1, 2025
2.5 Other Procedures
It is recommended to perform transcranial color duplex sonography (TCD) in monitoring mode with measurement of the blood flow peak systolic velocity in the M1 segment of the MCA and calculation of the Lindegaard index in all patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage to assess the severity of cerebral vasospasm [16, 99, 100].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments:
The advantages of TCD include its non-invasive nature, speed and ease of performance, and the ability to perform serial examinations tracking blood flow velocity dynamics in the presence of cerebral vasospasm (CVS). If a decision is made regarding invasive treatment of CVS, DSA is required.
The Lindegaard index is the ratio of the mean blood flow velocity in the M1 segment of the MCA to the mean blood flow velocity in the extracranial portion of the ipsilateral ICA.
To characterize the presence and severity of CVS according to TCD data, it is advisable to calculate the mean blood flow velocity (MBFV) in the M1 segment of the MCA [27, 101]. At the same time, in the domestic neurosurgical school, calculating the Lindegaard index using systolic velocities is acceptable. The grades of CVS severity according to the Lindegaard index and systolic (mean) blood flow velocities are presented in Table 1.
Table 1. Grades of severity of cerebral vasospasm based on TCD data [27, 101]
Mean (systolic) velocity in the MCA, cm/s | Lindegaard index (MCA/neck ICA velocity ratio) | Interpretation |
100-120 (120-160) | 2-3 | No vasospasm |
120-200 (160-240) | 3-6 | Moderate |
>200 (240) | >6 | Severe |
It is recommended to perform brain computed tomography perfusion, if technically available at the medical facility, in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with Fisher grade III–IV due to rupture of a middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery aneurysm prior to surgery to identify areas of silent ischemia [102–106].
GGR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: for the Fisher scale, see Appendix G2.
It is recommended to perform brain computed tomography perfusion, if technically available at the medical facility, when there is a clinically justified suspicion of cerebral vasospasm and an increase in the mean blood flow velocity in the M1 segment above 200 cm/s according to transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) in monitoring mode, to assess the risk of massive ischemia [107–109].
GCR BLoE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: in CT perfusion, a critical decrease in cerebral blood flow (CBF) in the territory of the spastic artery below 10–15 mL/100 g/min, cerebral blood volume (CBV) below 1–1.5 mL/100 g, and an increase in mean transit time (MTT) above 6 seconds are considered significant [27, 108].
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
3.1 Treatment of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma
The management of hemorrhagic stroke is complex and not fully resolved. Existing published clinical trial results do not allow for definitive conclusions regarding the superiority of conservative versus neurosurgical treatment in terms of functional recovery during inpatient treatment or subsequent outpatient care. Clinical trial results for neurosurgical treatment indicate that it can prevent mortality in some patients, but its positive impact on the degree of subsequent disability has not been definitively established. The results of clinical trials of conservative treatments are also not entirely conclusive, which often hinders their practical application. What remains certain is that the patient must undergo treatment and rehabilitation in a medical institution that includes departments of neurosurgery, critical care and intensive care, and early rehabilitation.
3.1.1 Intensive care for patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma
Blood pressure management in hypertensive intracerebral hematoma
The safety and efficacy of lowering systolic blood pressure (SBP) within 7 days of symptom onset were evaluated in the ATACH [110], INTERACT [111], INTERACT2 [112], ATACH-II, and INTERACT3 [113] randomized clinical trials, as well as in a pooled analysis of patient data from the INTERACT2 and ATACH-II trials [114].
It is recommended to lower systolic blood pressure below 140 mm Hg using intravenous antihypertensive drugs (selective calcium channel blockers with primary vascular action (C08C), ACE inhibitors (C09AA), beta-blockers (C07A), and alpha-blockers (C02CA)) under continuous monitoring (striving for minimal blood pressure variability) in confirmed hemorrhagic stroke within the first 6 hours after symptom onset to reduce the final hematoma volume [113, 115].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Blood pressure reduction within 6 hours of symptom onset in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage is associated with a lower risk of hematoma expansion. A meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials involving 2,919 participants showed an odds ratio of 0.76 (95% CI 0.60–0.95) regarding hematoma growth. This indicates that early blood pressure lowering is an effective strategy for preventing hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage [115]. The results of the combined INTERACT2 and ATACH-II analysis showed that blood pressure reduction was linearly associated with an increased probability of a more favorable 90-day outcome (modified Rankin scale score of 0–2). In patients with SBP values exceeding 220 mm Hg, more aggressive blood pressure lowering may be justified [37, 114, 115]. According to INTERACT3, it is advisable to achieve a target SBP below 140 mm Hg within 1 hour of treatment initiation [113], but no faster than 60 mm Hg per hour [115]. Lowering SBP below 130 mm Hg is not recommended [113].
It is recommended to initiate antihypertensive therapy early in patients with small hematomas (volume <30 mL), ideally within the first 2 hours after symptom onset [115].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to maintain systolic blood pressure below 140 mm Hg for 7 days from disease onset [113, 115].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Body temperature control
It is recommended for a patient with a hypertensive intracerebral hematoma, after hospitalization, to reduce body temperature using physical cooling methods and/or antipyretic drugs (ATC M01A Antiinflammatory and antirheumatic products) to a target value of ≤37.5°C [113].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: it is advisable to reach a target body temperature of ≤37.5°C within 1 hour of treatment initiation and maintain it for 7 days [113].
Glycemic control
It is recommended for a patient with a hypertensive intracerebral hematoma during hospitalization to achieve blood glucose levels using glucose-lowering drugs (ATC A10 Drugs used in diabetes) to target values of 6.1–7.8 mmol/L in patients without diabetes mellitus and 7.8–10.0 mmol/L in patients with diabetes mellitus [113].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comments: it is advisable to achieve target glycemic levels within 7 days [113].
Correction of hemostatic disorders in hypertensive intracerebral hematoma
Currently, due to the increasingly active use of anticoagulant therapy, particularly for the prevention of ischemic stroke, the number of hemorrhagic strokes occurring against the background of these drugs is increasing. In addition, hypertensive ICH may also occur against the background of antiplatelet therapy, as well as in patients with pre-existing hemostatic disorders. The regimen for reversing antithrombotic agents in patients with newly developed hypertensive ICH is presented in Appendix B2.
It is recommended to discontinue vitamin K antagonists (B01AA: warfarin**, etc.) and administer phytomenadione (B02BA01) 20 mg intravenously in combination with coagulation factors II, VII, IX, and X in combination** (B02BD01) or fresh frozen plasma in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma within 7 days of symptom onset in the presence of an elevated INR due to vitamin K antagonist intake (B01AA: warfarin**, etc.) to achieve a target INR level of <1.5 [37, 113, 116].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: it is advisable to achieve the target INR level of <1.5 within 1 hour of treatment initiation and maintain it for 7 days [113].
In 2024, a parenteral form of vitamin K1 (phytomenadione; B02BA01) registered for use in patients became available in Russia as an emulsion for intravenous administration. Unlike the oral form, intravenous administration of phytomenadione (vitamin K1) increases clotting factor production within 1–2 hours and achieves maximum effect as early as 12 hours. In case of persistent INR elevation, administration of phytomenadione (vitamin K) can be repeated every 12 hours. In most patients with bleeding associated with VKAs, administration of phytomenadione (vitamin K1) is recommended to be started without waiting for laboratory tests and imaging data, as the risks associated with vitamin K1 administration are low [37].
Compared to fresh frozen plasma (FFP), blood coagulation factors II, VII, IX and X in combination [Prothrombin complex]** (B02BD01) may cause fewer complications, and their administration allows for a more rapid correction of INR [37, 116].
Administration of FFP requires not only time for blood transfusion preparation (thawing, cross-matching, etc.), but also the administration of a significantly larger volume (20 mL/kg), which often delays the normalization of INR and can take an average of up to 30 hours. In addition, the large volume of administered FFP increases the risks of fluid overload (especially against the background of concomitant cardiac pathology that originally required vitamin K antagonist therapy) and the development of transfusion reactions. The incidence of thrombotic complications is similar both with prothrombin complex concentrate therapy and FFP administration [117].
It is not recommended to use recombinant activated coagulation factor VII (eptacog alfa [activated])** (B02BD08) for correcting elevated INR levels associated with vitamin K antagonist intake in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma [37, 116].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: administration of recombinant coagulation factor VIIa** is not recommended, as it may lead to a decrease in INR but does not replace all necessary coagulation factors. In addition, it is characterized by a rapid half-life (2–3 hours), after which a repeat dose or another drug will be required [117].
It is not recommended to use menadione sodium bisulfite** to reverse the effect of vitamin K antagonists due to low efficacy [118].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to discontinue dabigatran etexilate** (B01AE07) and administer the specific antidote idarucizumab or #coagulation factors II, VII, IX and X in combination [Prothrombin complex]** within the first 6 hours after verification of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in patients receiving dabigatran etexilate (B01AE07)**. In patients with ICH associated with rivaroxaban** (B01AF01) or apixaban** (B01AF02), the use of #coagulation factors II, VII, IX and X in combination [Prothrombin complex]** is recommended due to the unavailability of a specific antidote [37, 119, 120].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: The frequency and doses of administration are calculated individually based on the patient's body weight and INR value. It is advisable to consider administering 25–50 IU/kg depending on the INR value with subsequent re-evaluation [37, 119, 120]. At the same time, the maximum single dose should not exceed the recommended dose for each individual drug within the group of coagulation factors II, VII, IX and X in combination [Prothrombin complex]** (B02BD01).
It is recommended to administer protamine sulfate** (V03AB14) within the first 6 hours after verification of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage to inhibit the effect of heparin sodium** (B01AB01) (unfractionated heparin, UFH) [37, 116].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: against the background of therapeutic doses of heparin sodium** (B01AB01), intravenous administration of protamine sulfate** (V03AB14) is indicated, which is injected as a bolus at a rate of 1 mL (10 mg) of solution over 2 minutes. If necessary, injections are repeated at intervals of 15–30 minutes; the total dose is usually 5 mL (50 mg) of solution, administered over 10 minutes. No more than 150 mg should be administered within 1 hour. An alternative method for calculating the required dose is the administration of 1 mg of protamine sulfate** per 100 units of UFH, taking into account the half-life of heparin sodium** (from 1 to 2 hours). Protamine sulfate** should be administered by slow intravenous infusion not exceeding 20 mg/min (due to the risk of anaphylactic reactions). Neutralization of intravenously administered heparin sodium** (UFH) occurs on average 5 minutes after administration and persists for 2 hours. Subcutaneously administered heparin sodium** (UFH) is characterized by a more prolonged effect due to slow absorption from the subcutaneous adipose tissue [119]. Reversal of a prophylactic dose of subcutaneous heparin sodium** (UFH) is not indicated [116].
It is recommended to use #protamine sulfate** (V03AB14) within the first 6 hours after verification of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in patients receiving low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) (ATX B01AB Heparin group): dalteparin sodium (B01AB04), enoxaparin sodium** (B01AB05), nadroparin calcium (B01AB06), for partial inactivation of LMWHs [116].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Unlike UFH (heparin sodium**), protamine sulfate** is less effective in reversing the effect of LMWHs because it does not bind to short carbohydrate chains of LMWHs, but it can neutralize higher molecular weight fractions, which are believed to be more frequently associated with bleeding [104]. Thus, protamine sulfate** (V03AB14) effectively inhibits the effect of LMWHs on FII, but only partially inhibits their effect on FX. The following dosing regimen for #protamine sulfate** is recommended: for enoxaparin sodium** (B01AB05) administered within the previous 8 hours – 1 mg of #protamine sulfate** per 1 mg of enoxaparin sodium**; administered more than 8 hours ago – 0.5 mg of #protamine sulfate** per 1 mg of enoxaparin sodium**. For dalteparin sodium** (B01AB04) and nadroparin calcium (B01AB06) – 1 mg of #protamine sulfate** per 100 anti-Xa IU [116].
Reversal is indicated only for therapeutic, but not prophylactic doses of LMWHs [116]. However, in a number of clinical situations associated with impaired LMWH elimination and drug accumulation, a therapeutic effect has been identified with prophylactic dosages [117]. Therefore, a personalized approach to LMWH dosing, based inter alia on laboratory monitoring, is increasingly taking a prominent place.
The presence and severity of the anticoagulant effect against the background of LMWHs can be determined by anti-Xa levels. Reversal of LMWHs in ICH is indicated at anti-Xa ≥0.3 and/or the occurrence of ICH less than 12 hours from the last LMWH administration.
It is not recommended in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage receiving drugs from the "platelet aggregation inhibitors, excluding heparin" group (B01AC) to perform platelet transfusion to inhibit the effect of these drugs [37, 116].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: The potential positive effect of platelet transfusion in hypertensive ICH has not been established. An important issue in reversing the effect of antiplatelet agents, other than heparin, is the laboratory assessment of their efficacy, since, according to various data, some patients have resistance to acetylsalicylic acid** and clopidogrel**. Irreversible inactivation of cyclooxygenase by acetylsalicylic acid** means that it exerts a prolonged pharmacodynamic effect and inhibits platelets for the remainder of their lifespan (up to 10 days). However, acetylsalicylic acid** has a very short pharmacokinetic half-life, so the drug remains in the circulation for only a few minutes. Consequently, platelet transfusion may be advisable in the management of bleeding associated with acetylsalicylic acid**, since new platelets will not be exposed to acetylsalicylic acid**. The 2016 guidelines suggest performing platelet transfusion in patients with ICH on acetylsalicylic acid** who are scheduled for neurosurgery. Following the discontinuation of irreversible P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel** (B01AC Platelet aggregation inhibitors excluding heparin), prasugrel (B01AC Platelet aggregation inhibitors excluding heparin)), the recovery of normal platelet function will occur only with the synthesis and release of new platelets into the bloodstream. When platelets are transfused less than 3–5 half-lives of P2Y12 inhibitor drugs (clopidogrel** (B01AC Platelet aggregation inhibitors excluding heparin), prasugrel (B01AC Platelet aggregation inhibitors excluding heparin)), pharmacological inhibition of the transfused platelets will be observed, and the presence of active metabolites of the drug may lead to even more prolonged platelet inhibition. Thus, in ICH on the background of P2Y12 inhibitors (clopidogrel** (B01AC Platelet aggregation inhibitors excluding heparin), prasugrel (B01AC Platelet aggregation inhibitors excluding heparin)), it is recommended to refrain from platelet transfusion even in the context of impending neurosurgical intervention [117].
It is not recommended to administer recombinant coagulation factor VIIa (eptacog alfa [activated])** (B02BD08) to patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma without coagulation disorders due to an increased risk of thromboembolic complications [115].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
It is not recommended to routinely use tranexamic acid** (B02AA02) due to the lack of certainty regarding the balance between clinical benefits (improvement in functional outcome, mortality) and adverse effects of tranexamic acid** (B02AA02) [115].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments:
The administration of #tranexamic acid** (B02AA02) (1 g IV bolus + 1 g IV infusion over 8 h) may be considered in patients with hypertensive ICH within 4.5 hours of symptom onset and at high risk of hematoma expansion in order to reduce the final ICH volume [121]. A high risk of hematoma expansion in addition to the time window of up to 4.5 hours from symptom onset is associated with the following CT/CTA neuroimaging signs:
Lobar hemorrhages (especially those associated with amyloid angiopathy)
Hematoma volume >30 ml or with rapid enlargement (>33% or >6 ml within 24 hours)
Specific features:
- "Spot sign" – punctate foci of contrast extravasation within the hematoma on CTA.
- "Black hole sign" – a hypodense area within a hyperdense hematoma on unenhanced CT.
- "Blend sign" – a combination of areas of varying density within the hematoma.
- "Island sign" – small, separate foci of hemorrhage surrounding the main hematoma.
Tranexamic acid** (B02AA02) in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage compared with placebo or open-label control had no statistically significant effect on mortality or dependence at 90 days, nor on 90-day mortality; however, tranexamic acid** (B02AA02) to some extent prevented hematoma growth at 24 hours compared with placebo or open-label control [121].
Management of cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma
The course of hypertensive ICH is significantly affected by the development of cerebral edema, which may also be accompanied by an increase in ICP. This requires measures for their management.
It is recommended in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma with a volume of ≥15 ml, presence of signs of elevated intracranial pressure >16–18 mm Hg, and cerebral edema, to prescribe solutions with an osmodiuretic effect (15% #mannitol** ((B05BC) 1.5–2.0 g/kg of body weight administered as an infusion over 30 minutes, or 10% sodium chloride solution (extemporaneous sterile medicinal products, OFS.1.8.0006), single dose 20–50 ml into a central vein [122–125]. Blood plasma osmolarity must be monitored; at an osmolarity greater than 320 mOsm/l, therapy is ineffective [126].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: The effect of #mannitol** (B05BC) was studied in a subanalysis of the INTERACT2 patient cohort, which included 2,839 patients [124]. Its administration was safe, and the incidence of adverse events in the subgroup of patients receiving #mannitol** (B05BC) did not exceed that in patients not receiving #mannitol** (B05BC).
It is not recommended to prescribe dexamethasone** (H02AB02) for ICH due to the lack of proven efficacy and an increased risk of mortality [127].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Prevention of lower extremity venous thrombosis and thromboembolic complications
One of the important factors influencing the course of the acute period of hypertensive ICH is the risk of deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities and thromboembolic complications (VTE), which is particularly high in patients with severe motor impairments or those who are immobile due to other reasons. VTE prevention in hypertensive ICH presents a particular challenge, requiring an assessment not only of the VTE risk itself, but also of the risk of re-bleeding [128].
It is recommended in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma who are at risk for VTE to undergo deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis starting from the day of admission using intermittent pneumatic compression and/or medical compression stockings, provided there are no contraindications to their use [129].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: The use of lower extremity elastic compression alone does not reduce the risk of deep vein thrombosis or improve disease outcomes [129]. A prospective randomized trial comparing intermittent pneumatic compression combined with medical compression stockings versus the use of stockings alone showed a significant reduction in the risk of deep vein thrombosis [130]. However, the use of medical compression stockings may cause skin damage [131].
Before initiating intermittent pneumatic compression, it is justified to perform duplex scanning of the lower extremity veins to rule out pre-existing deep vein thrombosis.
It is recommended to prophylactically administer low-molecular-weight heparins (B01AB Heparin group) or #unfractionated sodium heparin** (B01AB01) subcutaneously (5,000 anti-Xa IU every 8 hours or 2,500–5,000 anti-Xa IU every 12 hours) no earlier than 48 hours after the onset of hypertensive intracerebral hematoma symptoms in the absence of signs of ongoing hematoma expansion and coagulopathy [126, 130, 132, 133].
GGR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: The recommended dose of #enoxaparin sodium** (B01AB05) is 40 mg once daily subcutaneously. Doses are calculated individually based on the patient's body weight. According to a meta-analysis including 1,000 ICH patients from 4 studies, 2 of which were randomized [133], early administration of #enoxaparin sodium** (B01AB05) or #heparin sodium** (B01AB01) preparations (1–6 days after admission) was associated with a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of pulmonary embolism and a slight increase in hematoma volume. An individualized approach is required, taking into account the surgical intervention and the patient's clinical status, with mandatory monitoring of hemostasis and neurological dynamics.
Resumption of antithrombotic therapy in patients who have developed a hypertensive intracerebral hematoma
Patients who have suffered a hypertensive ICH and have been receiving antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy for other conditions or for the prevention of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease, and who have indications for the resumption of such therapy, should be considered as candidates to resume the appropriate treatment [134].
It is recommended to resume antiplatelet therapy (B01AC) in patients who have suffered a hypertensive intracerebral hematoma, provided that indications for this therapy persist due to concomitant diseases [134,135].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: the timing of resumption should be determined individually in each case [134]. Existing data are insufficient to definitively determine the optimal timing for resuming antiplatelet therapy. When administered, the risk of recurrent hemorrhage was significantly lower than the positive effect of secondary prevention of acute cerebrovascular accidents.
It is recommended that in patients who have suffered a hypertensive intracerebral hematoma and have a very high long-term risk of VTE, vitamin K antagonists (B01AA) be resumed on an individual basis, taking into account the assessment of potential benefit and the risk of recurrent bleeding [136–140].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: the optimal timing for resuming antithrombotic therapy is unknown. Clinical studies are currently underway to identify patient groups in whom resumption of antithrombotic therapy will be feasible.
3.1.2 Surgical treatment of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma
Surgical treatment is aimed at removing the ICH, eliminating brain compression and displacement, and resolving obstructive hydrocephalus [139,141–145].
It is recommended to perform surgical treatment for the removal of an intracerebral hematoma, taking into account the conditions for surgery, the presence of indications and absence of contraindications, timing, and methods [139,141–145].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Conditions for surgical treatment of hemorrhagic stroke
To perform surgical interventions, the operating room must be equipped in accordance with current regulations. Minimally invasive surgeries, such as:
puncture aspiration (A16.23.015 Puncture of brain hematoma, A16.23.017 Removal of brain hematoma),
local fibrinolysis (A16.23.017.001 Closed drainage of brain hematoma using fibrinolytic agents),
endoscopic aspiration (A16.23.015 Puncture of brain hematoma, A16.23.017 Removal of brain hematoma)
can be performed under locoregional anesthesia (B01.003.004.002 Regional block anesthesia).
Risk factors for an unfavorable outcome in surgical treatment include [8, 142, 143]:
- decrease in wakefulness to stupor and below;
- intracerebral hematoma volume greater than 50 cm3;
- massive ventricular hemorrhage;
- midline shift of 10 mm or more;
- deformation of the brainstem cisterns;
- rebleeding.
Indications and contraindications for surgical treatment
It is recommended to remove putaminal and subcortical hematomas (A16.23.017.009 Removal of deep brain structure hematomas, A16.23.017.007 Removal of cerebral hemisphere hematomas) with a volume greater than 30 cm3 causing severe neurological deficit and/or brain shift (midline shift greater than 5 mm or deformation of brainstem cisterns) [8,147–151]
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to remove a cerebellar hematoma (A16.23.017.008 Removal of cerebellar hematomas) with a volume greater than 10-15 cm3, diameter greater than 3 cm, causing brainstem compression and/or obstructive hydrocephalus [8,147–151]
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is not recommended to perform external ventricular drainage alone without removing the cerebellar hematoma due to the potential increase in axial brain shift [8, 143–145].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform surgical treatment for thalamic hemorrhage accompanied by ventricular hemotamponade and/or obstructive hydrocephalus [8,148,149].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: The advisability of surgical removal of hypertensive thalamic hematomas with a volume greater than 10 cm3 and brainstem hematomas accompanied by severe neurological deficit is under discussion, and neurosurgeons have not yet reached a consensus on this matter [141].
It is not recommended to perform surgical intervention in the presence of depression of consciousness to coma (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 7 or less) [8,147–151]
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: In comatose patients, outcomes do not depend on the treatment method (intensive care or surgical intervention) [146].
It is not recommended to perform surgery against the background of severe arterial hypertension (systolic BP greater than 200 mm Hg) [142, 144].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: A relative contraindication to surgery is the presence of severe somatic pathology (diabetes mellitus, sub- and decompensated renal, hepatic, cardiovascular, and pulmonary pathology, coagulopathies, sepsis) [8].
Selection of surgical timing
It is recommended to perform emergency surgery in patients with a cerebellar intracerebral hematoma with a volume greater than 15 cm3, given the risk of brainstem compression and obstructive hydrocephalus [147, 148].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform emergency surgery in patients with lobar intracerebral hematoma (subcortical and putaminal localization) with depression of consciousness to deep lethargy and stupor (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9–12) due to the development of herniation syndrome [147, 148].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform urgent surgery (within 72 hours of admission to the hospital) in patients with lobar intracerebral hematoma with a consciousness level of 13-14 on the Glasgow Coma Scale [146, 147, 156, 157].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: If the patient's condition is compensated, wakefulness is normal or depressed no deeper than lethargy, there are no signs of progressive brain compression, but blood pressure values are high (systolic above 200 mm Hg), it is advisable to postpone surgery until blood pressure is lowered and stabilized to avoid difficulties with intraoperative hemostasis and postoperative hematoma recurrence. In some cases, the hematoma may continue to form during the first 24 hours and is prone to recurrence, therefore surgical removal of hematomas in the first 24 hours is associated with an increased risk of rebleeding [144, 151, 152].
Surgical treatment methods
Some procedures can be supplemented with local fibrinolysis (A16.23.017.001 Closed drainage of brain hematoma using fibrinolytic agents). If it is used, taking into account the use of off-label drugs, a medical committee meeting is required, indicating the necessity of this type of treatment for life-saving indications. The most studied drug for local fibrinolysis in the Russian Federation is recombinant #prourokinase**. The average single dose is 50,000 IU, and the exposure time is 6-12 hours [160,161].
It is recommended to perform minimally invasive removal of putaminal and cerebellar hematomas (A16.23.017.009 Removal of deep brain structure hematomas, A16.23.017.008 Removal of cerebellar hematomas) (using endoscopic aspiration methods – A16.23.015 Removal of brain hematoma, local fibrinolysis – A16.23.017.001 Closed drainage of brain hematoma using fibrinolytic agents, stereotactic navigation – A16.23.023 Stereotactic brain surgeries in the absence of severe herniation syndrome or life-threatening brain shift according to head computed tomography [8,147–151,161].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments:
For basal ganglia ICH with a volume greater than 25-30 cm3, surgical intervention reduces mortality and improves functional outcomes [143, 155, 156].
Surgery may be supplemented with local fibrinolysis (A16.23.017.001 Closed drainage of brain hematoma using fibrinolytic agents) [8,147,161].
It is recommended when performing emergency surgery to carry out microsurgical removal of the intracerebral hematoma in patients with subcortical, putaminal, and cerebellar intracerebral hematomas presenting with rapidly progressive herniation syndrome due to the highest risk of rebleeding in the first 24 hours and the need to achieve reliable surgical hemostasis [149, 150, 157].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: In subcortical hemorrhages, microsurgical exploration of the hematoma cavity is necessary to remove a potential angiographically occult malformation, the incidence of which can reach 30% [157, 158].
It is recommended to perform minimally invasive removal of subcortical hematomas (A16.23.017.007 Removal of cerebral hemisphere hematomas) using endoscopic aspiration methods – A16.23.015 Removal of intracerebral hematoma, local fibrinolysis – A16.23.017.001 Closed drainage of cerebral hematoma using fibrinolytic agents, with stereotactic navigation – A16.23.023 Stereotactic operations on the brain in patients with severe somatic pathology [8,148,149,161].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: A mandatory condition in this case is total selective cerebral angiography to rule out vascular malformation.
In subcortical ICH with a volume of more than 25–30 cm3, surgical intervention helps reduce mortality and improve functional outcomes [142, 153, 159].
The surgery may be supplemented by local fibrinolysis (A16.23.017.001 Closed drainage of cerebral hematoma using fibrinolytic agents).
It is recommended to perform external ventricular drainage or endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients with small cerebellar hematoma (less than 10 cm3) accompanied by displacement and/or occlusion of the fourth ventricle or cerebral aqueduct with the development of obstructive hydrocephalus [8,148,149,161,168].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform minimally invasive removal of intracerebral hematoma via endoscopic or puncture aspiration, if necessary (with signs of obstructive hydrocephalus) supplemented by cerebrospinal fluid shunting (endoscopic third ventriculostomy or external ventricular drainage placement) for a cerebellar intracerebral hematoma volume of 10–20 cm3 and a patient consciousness level of 13–14 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale [8, 147–149].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform microsurgical removal of intracerebral hematoma and posterior cranial fossa decompressive craniectomy, supplemented by cerebrospinal fluid shunting (endoscopic third ventriculostomy or external ventricular drainage placement) for a cerebellar intracerebral hematoma volume greater than 20 cm3 and a patient consciousness level of 8–12 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale [8, 147–149].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to use neuronavigation during puncture aspiration of the hematoma when removing putaminal, cerebellar, and ventricular hemorrhages [14, 145, 153, 154, 160–164].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform puncture aspiration and local fibrinolysis for putaminal, thalamic, or mixed intracerebral hematomas with a volume of 30–45 cm3 accompanied by prominent focal neurological symptoms [159, 160].
GCR BLE 4Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is not recommended to perform local fibrinolysis if the catheter tip is positioned outside the center of the intracerebral hematoma [160,161].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform external drainage of the lateral ventricles with local fibrinolysis of blood clots or their endoscopic removal (provided vascular anomaly is ruled out) in massive hemorrhage into the lateral ventricles [146, 159, 160, 165].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: In complete tamponade of both lateral ventricles, it is recommended to place two external ventricular drains into the frontal horns and administer a dose of 50,000 IU of recombinant #prourokinase** into each ventricle.
It is recommended in patients with obstructive hydrocephalus to perform endoscopic third ventriculostomy and/or external drainage until obstructive hydrocephalus resolves and patency of the ventricular system is restored [4, 160].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to supplement the hematoma intervention with the placement of an intracranial pressure monitor in patients in critical condition (reduced consciousness to sopor, severe somatic pathology) who may require prolonged intensive care in the postoperative period [148,149].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is not recommended to perform open removal of putaminal hematomas combined with primary decompressive craniectomy, as this is associated with a high risk of poor outcomes [173].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform delayed (secondary) decompressive craniectomy for subcortical and putaminal hematomas in patients with increasing edema and lateral brain displacement without rebleeding [173].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
3.1.3 Postoperative management of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma
After surgery, the patient is admitted to the neuro-ICU/step-down unit (see section 3.1.1. Intensive care of patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma).
It is recommended to perform a brain CT scan within 24 hours after surgical treatment (control study); every 24 hours during local fibrinolysis (A16.23.017.001 Closed drainage of cerebral hematoma using fibrinolytic agents); on days 7 and 21 after drain removal; and urgently in case of neurological deterioration [160,161].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to monitor intracranial pressure until it is stably normalized (less than 15 mm Hg) for ICP-directed intensive care [8, 37].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
3.2 Treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
3.2.1 Intensive care for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Preoperative management and treatment of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage
The goals of conservative treatment in preoperative SAH patients are stabilizing their condition, preventing SAH recurrence, and preventing and treating cerebral vasospasm and ischemia.
General recommendations
It is recommended for all patients in the acute period of aSAH to maintain strict bed rest to minimize systemic blood pressure fluctuations and reduce the risk of aSAH recurrence [174].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended for all patients in the acute period of aSAH to receive analgesia and/or sedation during all procedures (NSAIDs (M01A), paracetamol** (N02BE01), or tramadol** (N02AX02)) to reduce headache and other types of pain [17, 168].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended for all patients in the acute period of aSAH to maintain normothermia <38.0 °C [175].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: In case of persistent fever, an infectious origin must be ruled out. Fever should be managed pharmacologically or using external cooling systems.
It is recommended for all patients in the acute period of aSAH presenting with lethargy, sopor, or coma to have a nasogastric tube placed due to the risk of aspiration, and a urinary catheter to monitor urine output [174].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended for all patients in the acute period of aSAH to be prescribed laxative enemas to prevent increases in intracranial pressure and aSAH recurrence [174].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended for all patients in the acute period of aSAH to discontinue antithrombotic therapy [116].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended from the time of hospital admission in the acute period of aSAH to use intermittent pneumatic compression or medical compression garments (stockings) for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis and thromboembolic complications [128].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended for all patients in the acute period of aSAH to maintain blood glucose levels <10 mmol/L [17, 168].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to consider the prophylactic use of antiepileptic drugs (#levetiracetam** (N03AX14) IV 500 mg twice daily; or #valproic acid** (N03AG01) IV 3–41.5 mg/kg/day) in patients with any of the following features: subarachnoid hemorrhage from a middle cerebral artery aneurysm; Hunt-Hess grade 3–5; Fisher radiological grade III–IV; hemorrhage focus adjacent to cortical structures; hydrocephalus [177, 178].
LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence – 4) – for #valproic acid**
LoR CGoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence – 5) – for #levetiracetam**
Comments: duration of use should not exceed 7 days.
Administration of antiepileptic drugs is recommended for patients who develop seizures in the acute period (levetiracetam** (N03AX14) IV 500–1000 mg × 2 times/day; or valproic acid** (N03AG01) IV 20–30 mg/kg/day) [178].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: Dosage regimen:
low-intensity therapy: monotherapy: levetiracetam** at a dose <2000 mg/day (<1000 mg/day in renal impairment), valproic acid** at a dose ≤15 mg/kg/day or average level <75 µg/mL;
high-intensity therapy: for more than 48 hours, levetiracetam** at a dose ≥2000 mg/day (≥1000 mg/day in renal impairment), valproic acid** at a dose >15 mg/kg/day or average level ≥75 µg/mL;
duration of use should not exceed 7 days.
It is recommended to perform 24–48-hour video-electroencephalography monitoring in patients with a persistent decrease in the level of wakefulness or impaired consciousness to rule out non-convulsive seizures, if the onset of generalized cerebral symptoms cannot be explained by other causes [27].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Prevention of rebleeding
It is recommended to perform surgical exclusion of the aneurysm from the circulation as the main method for preventing rebleeding [16, 17, 168].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is not recommended to use antifibrinolytic therapy (B02AA) for the routine treatment of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage [27].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Prevention of respiratory disorders
It is recommended to maintain SpO2 ≥92% with supplemental oxygen support if necessary [27][173].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform tracheal intubation and transfer the patient to mechanical ventilation in case of increasing respiratory failure during O2 insufflation or the development of neurological deterioration requiring airway protection [123, 174].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Normalization and stabilization of systemic hemodynamic parameters.
It is recommended to maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels below <160 mm Hg [16, 27].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to use nimodipine** (C08CA06) or urapidil** (C02CA06) in dosages corresponding to the instructions for use to relieve episodes of arterial hypertension; the decision on the simultaneous administration of oral antihypertensive drugs is made individually [16,17,136][181].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform infusion therapy (B05BB) in the event of arterial hypotension. If ineffective, infusion of colloidal solutions (B05AA), sympathomimetic drugs (C01CA) (norepinephrine**) should be used [27,182,183].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Prevention of cerebral vasospasm and brain ischemia
It is recommended to use calcium channel blockers: nimodipine** (C08CA06) in tablets, 60 mg 6 times a day every 4 hours (maximum dose 360 mg) per os or via a nasogastric tube for 21 days [16, 17].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: If the patient develops arterial hypotension, consider discontinuing the drug.
The use of other calcium channel blockers, as well as alternative routes of administration (intravenous), is not recommended [27, 177].
3.2.2 Surgical treatment of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Indications for surgery (impact of patient status)
It is recommended to perform surgical treatment for a ruptured aneurysm in the acute period of hemorrhage regardless of the timing of the hemorrhage in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage with a Hunt-Hess grade of I-IV [17, 178–181].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform brain aneurysm surgery in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage in the acute period within the first 24 hours after hemorrhage with a Hunt-Hess grade V, a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or more, and the presence of an intracerebral hematoma with a volume of 30 cm3 or more [17, 178–181].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is not recommended to perform brain aneurysm surgery in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage in the acute period in extremely severe condition and with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 7 or less [178–180, 182–185].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: in isolated cases, the decision to perform surgery in severe patients is made by a medical board.
Timing of surgery
It is recommended to perform surgery within 72 hours from the detection of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm and/or within 24 hours from the patient's admission to a hospital with a neurosurgical service in the absence of contraindications [17, 168, 178–181].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: in patients with complex aneurysms (giant, fusiform, vertebrobasilar, and paraclinoid localization), preoperative preparation may take longer. If surgical care cannot be provided at the site of diagnosis verification, the patient should be transferred to tertiary medical centers with neurosurgical and endovascular capabilities for emergency indications.
Choice of Surgical Treatment Method
There are 2 alternative treatment methods for cerebral aneurysms – microsurgical and endovascular. The choice of treatment method depends on the technical equipment of the center and the level of development of each technique within it [27,186,192–200].
It is recommended to perform microsurgical intervention in patients with aneurysms of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery, pericallosal artery, anterior communicating artery, middle cerebral artery, and posterior inferior cerebellar artery [14, 16, 168, 194, 196].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: if for any reason microsurgical intervention cannot be performed, the possibility of endovascular intervention should be considered.
It is recommended to perform endovascular intervention in patients with aneurysms of the bifurcation and trunk of the basilar artery, the origin of the superior cerebellar artery, the origin of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery, the posterior inferior cerebellar artery, the ophthalmic and communicating segments of the internal carotid artery, and the intracranial segment of the vertebral artery [14, 16, 168, 196].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: if for any reason endovascular intervention cannot be performed, the possibility of microsurgical intervention should be considered.
Surgeries in Patients with Multiple Aneurysms
It is recommended to prioritize the exclusion of the ruptured aneurysm using the most appropriate (microsurgical or endovascular) method [14, 16, 168].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: The feasibility of excluding all aneurysms from the bloodstream in a single surgical procedure or in multiple stages, including a combination of microsurgical and endovascular interventions, is decided individually in each specific case.
Direct Microsurgical Interventions for Aneurysms in the Acute Period
It is recommended to perform microsurgical exclusion of the aneurysm by clipping its neck or sacrificing the parent artery provided adequate collateral circulation is present [16, 168, 181, 197].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: if the parent artery is sacrificed along with the aneurysm, the decision regarding the need for an additional revascularization surgery or mandatory decompressive craniectomy is made by the operating surgeon depending on the specific situation.
It is recommended that all microsurgical operations for cerebral aneurysms in the acute period be performed under general balanced endotracheal anesthesia [16, 197, 199].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to first exclude from the bloodstream the cerebral aneurysm that served as the source of hemorrhage [14, 16, 168].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended, if possible, to simultaneously exclude from the bloodstream all concomitant aneurysms accessible through a single surgical approach [14, 16, 168].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the feasibility of simultaneous microsurgical exclusion of aneurysms in the acute period of hemorrhage is determined by the surgeon during the operation, taking into account the state of the brain, the severity of hemorrhage, etc.
It is recommended to use a wide lateral supraorbital craniotomy for typical aneurysms of the anterior parts of the circle of Willis or another approach depending on the aneurysm location (anterior interhemispheric, median suboccipital, retrosigmoid) [16, 181][173].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is not recommended to routinely open the lamina terminalis as a measure to prevent hydrocephalus during microsurgical clipping of a cerebral aneurysm [206].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
Control of Microsurgical Efficacy
It is recommended to open the aneurysm dome after final clip placement [167, 181][173].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: The absence of bleeding will indicate the complete exclusion of the aneurysm sac.
It is recommended to perform intraoperative assessment of the patency of parent arteries and functionally significant branches through visual inspection of the clipping area (via microscope and/or endoscope), ultrasound examination of cerebral blood flow, or fluorescence video angiography [168, 181, 200].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: in the postoperative period following microsurgical clipping of an aneurysm, control angiographic examinations (CTA or DSA) are performed to assess the state of the neck and confirm the radicality of clipping [16, 181, 201]. CTA is a minimally invasive method with a lower radiation dose; it requires a 64-slice or higher CT scanner. DSA is a more invasive method and is indicated when CT angiography cannot be performed [209]. If technically feasible, it is recommended to perform CTA with metal artifact reduction software to minimize artifacts from the clip for precise visualization of arteries in the clip zone [210].
Intraoperative sanation of the basal cisterns
It is recommended to perform combined sanation of the basal cisterns from blood using cisternal drainage combined with intrathecal administration of a fibrinolytic agent (ATC: B01AD Enzymes) in patients with massive hemorrhage (grade III–IV on the modified Fisher scale, > 20 points on the Hijdra scale) who underwent microsurgical treatment within the first 72 hours from the aneurysm rupture [211–214].
GGR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments:
modified Fisher scale – see Appendix G2;
Hijdra scale – see Appendix G6;
when using off-label drugs, a medical panel (consilium) must be convened, indicating the necessity of this treatment type for life-saving reasons!
It is not recommended to administer fibrinolytics intrathecally (ATC: B01AD Enzymes) in cases of incomplete exclusion of the ruptured aneurysm, presence of other unclipped aneurysms, or individual intolerance (hypersensitivity) to fibrinolytic agents (ATC: B01AD Enzymes) [211].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: when administering a fibrinolytic intraoperatively (ATC: B01AD Enzymes), the procedure should be performed after the ruptured aneurysm has been excluded from the circulation. Visual control of hemostasis efficacy should be performed at the end of the microsurgical stage.
It is recommended to use #alteplase** at a dosage of 1–5 mg for intrathecal administration of a fibrinolytic (ATC: B01AD Enzymes) [212].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to use #recombinant protein containing the amino acid sequence of staphylokinase** at a dosage of 1–2 mg for intrathecal administration of a fibrinolytic (ATC: B01AD Enzymes) [211].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: for intraoperative irrigation of the basal cisterns, the fibrinolytic agent (ATC: B01AD Enzymes) should be diluted in 10 ml of sodium chloride** physiological solution. For postoperative administration of the fibrinolytic (ATC: B01AD Enzymes) into the cisternal drain, it should be diluted in 5 ml of sodium chloride** physiological solution.
It is recommended to monitor the tightness and sterility of the cisternal drainage system [211].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform daily CSF analysis from the cisternal drain [211].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: cisternal drainage should be discontinued when the erythrocyte count in the clinical CSF analysis drops below 10,000 cells/µl
Endovascular procedure
It is recommended to first occlude the aneurysm that served as the source of hemorrhage [180, 208, 209].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended whenever possible to simultaneously occlude concomitant aneurysms with a high risk of rupture (irregular shapes of the aneurysm sac, daughter sacs, or diverticula) [216–218].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to perform all endovascular procedures for cerebral aneurysm in the acute period under general balanced endotracheal anesthesia [16, 197, 198].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to aim for complete aneurysm occlusion (Raymond Roy class I). If total occlusion is not feasible without the risk of parent artery occlusion, one should settle for subtotal aneurysm occlusion (Raymond Roy class II) followed by radical treatment in the delayed period [212, 213, 222].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments:
The evaluation is performed according to the Raymond Roy classification (see Appendix 19) [221].
Incomplete aneurysm occlusion (Raymond Roy class II–III) is considered sufficient in the absence of contrast opacification of the suspected aneurysm rupture site (aneurysm dome, diverticula) and acceptable if the medical facility where the patient was hospitalized lacks the necessary consumables. Repeat more complete embolization is performed in the delayed period. If the high risk of rerupture persists, the patient is indicated for transfer to a specialized federal center.
It is recommended to perform endovascular microcoil occlusion of the aneurysm cavity for embolization in the acute period of hemorrhage – (A16.12.041.002) [16, 179, 196, 223].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: Balloon assistance (or supportive endovascular vessel occlusion using a balloon – A16.12.041.003 according to the Ministry of Health nomenclature) should be used when it is impossible to achieve a stable position of the vascular microcatheter in the aneurysm, when forming a tight complex of endovascular microcoils in the aneurysm is difficult, when cerebral vessel angioplasty is required, or when there is a high risk of intraoperative aneurysm rupture. Alternative techniques allowing the formation of a stable endovascular microcoil complex in the aneurysm may be used: the double-catheter technique and temporary remodeling devices. Parent artery deconstruction is possible provided there is adequate collateral blood flow [194, 222–224].
It is not recommended to routinely use stent assistance (or transarterial occlusion of the aneurysm cavity using endovascular microcoils for embolization with stent support (A16.12.041.004) (uncovered metal intracranial vascular stent***) in the acute period of aneurysm rupture [225–227].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: the use of an assisting uncovered metal intracranial vascular stent*** in the acute period of aneurysm rupture in tertiary care medical centers is permitted, provided all potential sources of intracranial hemorrhage are completely eliminated and open surgery is not required. Implantation should be performed against the background of intravenous administration of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (ATC B01AC Platelet aggregation inhibitors excluding heparin), followed by a switch to oral antiplatelet agents excluding heparin after surgery. Discontinuation of IIb/IIIa blockers (ATC B01AC Platelet aggregation inhibitors excluding heparin) is allowed no earlier than 2–4 hours after starting dual antiplatelet therapy [225–227].
Monitoring the efficacy of endovascular surgery
It is recommended to perform an angiographic study (magnetic resonance angiography of intracranial vessels or total selective cerebral angiography) 3–6 months after surgery to rule out aneurysm recanalization [16, 188, 201].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: if there are prerequisites for early life-threatening recanalization of the treated aneurysm, a follow-up examination may be performed promptly.
MRA of intracranial arteries is a non-invasive imaging method that does not require contrast administration; it requires a facility equipped with a magnetic resonance imager of at least 1.5 Tesla.
CAG is a more invasive method indicated when MRA cannot be performed [228].
Other surgical interventions in the acute period of subarachnoid hemorrhage
External ventricular drainage placement
It is recommended to place an external ventricular drain (A16.23.001 Ventricular puncture, A16.23.047 External drainage of lateral cerebral ventricles) (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) in all patients with acute hydrocephalus and when indicated (intracranial pressure control, management of intracranial hypertension) in other patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage [16, 222–226].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: An external ventricular drain (EVD) (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) is placed from the standard Kocher's point into the hemisphere contralateral to the main surgical approach. It is advisable to place the EVD (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) in a single operation, as a first stage prior to craniotomy and aneurysm clipping.
In the case of an endovascular intervention, an EVD (neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) is placed in the operating room immediately after aneurysm occlusion, prior to the patient's emergence from general anesthesia.
If endovascular surgery involves planned stenting and administration of antiplatelet agents in addition to heparin, the EVD (neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) should be placed before the procedure following induction of anesthesia.
It is recommended to place external ventricular drains (A16.23.001 Puncture of cerebral ventricle, A16.23.047 External drainage of lateral cerebral ventricles) (neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) in both lateral ventricles in patients with severe intraventricular hemorrhage (10–12 points on the Graeb scale) [164, 223, 225].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to administer a single intravenous dose of a systemic antibacterial drug prior to the insertion of an external ventricular drain (A16.23.001 Puncture of cerebral ventricle, A16.23.047 External drainage of lateral cerebral ventricles) (neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring), unless the patient is receiving systemic therapy for infectious complications of another localization [233].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the systemic antibacterial drug and its dose are determined by internal protocols approved at the hospital.
It is not recommended to use systemic antibacterial drugs for prophylactic purposes throughout the entire period of external ventricular drainage [233].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to monitor the tightness and sterility of the drainage system [227, 228].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform manipulations with the cerebrospinal fluid collection system as infrequently as possible [233].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is not recommended to hyperdrain cerebrospinal fluid: the upper level of the drainage tubing should be 10–15 cm above the external acoustic meatus [222, 227, 230].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform local treatment of the EVD insertion site with alcohol-containing antiseptic solutions (D08AX Other antiseptics and disinfectants) along with replacing the sterile dressing at least once every 2–3 days [233].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is not recommended to administer prophylactic instillations of antiseptics (D08AX) or systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) into the external ventricular drain [227, 228, 230, 231].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that all patients with an inserted external ventricular drain (neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) undergo microbiological (culture) examination of cerebrospinal fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms and/or molecular biological testing for opportunistic pathogens, measurement of glucose and lactate levels in cerebrospinal fluid, and a general (clinical) cerebrospinal fluid analysis at least once every 3 days or when clinically indicated (hyperthermia, elevated inflammatory blood markers, emergence of meningeal signs, development of wound CSF leakage, etc.) [227, 229][239].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform a single-stage (without prior clamping for 24 hours) removal of the external ventricular drain (neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) with tight closure of the wound tract [222, 227].
GCR BLE 4Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform ventriculoperitoneal shunting in patients with severe chronic posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus of aneurysmal origin [240].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Decompressive craniectomy
Primary (performed during aneurysm clipping surgery) and secondary (performed in a delayed manner) decompressive craniectomy (DC) are distinguished.
It is recommended to perform primary decompressive craniectomy in patients in the acute period of subarachnoid hemorrhage who present with any of the following factors: 1) Hunt-Hess grade V, 2) midline shift greater than 5 mm, 3) intracerebral hematoma greater than 30 ml, 4) signs of acute ischemia in patients with massive basal subarachnoid hemorrhage (Fisher III) on days 4–8 following hemorrhage [15, 242, 244].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: when performing decompressive craniectomy, adhere to the following surgical parameters [15,242–244]:
DC is performed on the side of the hemisphere with the most prominent edema;
frontotemporoparietal craniectomy is optimal;
the dimensions of the DC should be 12–15 cm in the anteroposterior direction;
resection of the temporal bone squama down to the middle cranial fossa base is mandatory;
an important condition for DC is duraplasty to expand the subarachnoid space for the edematous brain, which is achieved by suturing in a periosteal graft or artificial dura mater substitutes;
watertight closure of the dura mater during plasty reduces the risk of postoperative CSF leakage;
during the surgery, it is advisable to avoid opening the frontal sinus and air cells of the temporal bone and to ensure reliable stepwise and definitive hemostasis.
Intracranial pressure monitor placement
It is recommended to monitor intracranial pressure in all postoperative patients receiving continuous medical sedation or in a coma [120, 121, 181, 237].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Anesthetic management for surgeries in the acute period of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Goals of anesthesia during surgeries for cerebral aneurysms in the acute period:
A. patient anesthesia and analgesia during surgery;
B. prevention of re-rupture of the aneurysm at all stages of surgery until the aneurysm is obliterated;
C. provision of brain relaxation to facilitate the surgical procedure and reduce retraction injury to the brain parenchyma;
D. maintenance of adequate cerebral perfusion for the prevention of cerebral ischemia;
E. prevention of postoperative pain, nausea, and vomiting.
General recommendations
It is recommended to use intravenous general anesthetic agents (propofol** (N01AX10) 1–1.5 mg/kg for induction and 4–5 mg/kg for maintenance of anesthesia) in combination with opioid analgesics (fentanyl** (N01AH01) in accordance with the instructions) for induction and maintenance of anesthesia [246–248][249].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Intravenous general anesthetic agents, in particular propofol** (N01AX10), provide a lower ICP level, which may translate into less brain tissue tension and more favorable working conditions for the neurosurgeon. In addition, propofol** (N01AX10) exhibits antiepileptic and antiemetic activity [246–248].
It is recommended to maintain intraoperative normothermia (using warming devices) to ensure normocoagulation [241, 242, 250].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to perform regional scalp anesthesia (at the exit points of sensory branches of the trigeminal nerve onto the cranial surface; along the skin incision line; at the pin insertion sites of the head fixation frame) using long-acting local anesthetics (N01B) to ensure perioperative hemodynamic stability [240, 243, 244].
Level of recommendation 4 (Evidence level – C)
It is recommended to provide perioperative pharmacological prophylaxis for postoperative nausea and vomiting [254].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to place a urinary catheter in all patients undergoing surgery in the acute period of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage to measure hourly diuresis after induction [246, 247, 256].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to administer hyperosmolar agents intravenously (ATC B05BC Osmotherapeutic solutions) (15% mannitol** (B05BC01) in accordance with the instructions) to correct elevated intracranial pressure [257]
GGR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: it is preferable to administer the drugs into a central vein at a high rate (over 10–15 min). Infusion should be initiated at the moment of the skin incision.
It is recommended to perform intraoperative mechanical ventilation aimed at maintaining normoventilation, with obligatory capnographic monitoring ($ ext{PaCO}_2$ = 33–35 mmHg) [250, 251, 258].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: a stable $ ext{PaCO}_2$ level ensures stable cerebral blood volume and stable ICP; normoventilation leaves a reserve for potential ICP reduction via hyperventilation. It is important to consider that in the presence of impaired cerebral autoregulation under conditions of vasospasm in patients with severe SAH, even a minor increase in $ ext{PaCO}_3$ leads to a spike in ICP. For this reason, periods without ventilation (during intubation or emergence) should be as short as possible.
It is recommended to perform intraoperative glycemic control to prevent severe hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia associated with poor clinical outcomes [252, 253, 260].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
It is recommended to use thromboelastography (if available) when intraoperative systemic hemostatic disorders are suspected [262].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Comments: if thromboelastography (TEG, ROTEM) is not available, the hemostatic system can be assessed by determining the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time, and blood fibrinogen level
It is recommended that all patients in the acute period of SAH be awakened in the intensive care unit [255, 256, 264].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended for patients with Hunt-Hess I-II who had no complications during surgery to undergo early awakening and extubation for timely assessment of neurological status [246, 255, 263].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Systemic Hemodynamic Management
It is recommended to place a central venous catheter (MU 260000) in patients with Hunt-Hess III-V, signs of vasospasm (regardless of Hunt-Hess severity), operated on within 1-3 days of subarachnoid hemorrhage (regardless of Hunt-Hess severity) [246, 255].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform direct invasive continuous blood pressure measurement intraoperatively, started prior to anesthesia induction (or frequent non-invasive blood pressure measurement on peripheral arteries if arterial line placement is not feasible), to prevent and timely correct hemodynamic instability [266].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to maintain euvolemia (Hct >30%) throughout the surgery [258, 260].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Given the high incidence of hypovolemia, forced infusion therapy may be required as early as the beginning of surgery.
It is recommended to correct intraoperative hypotension to prevent secondary brain injury [261, 263, 270].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: initiating an infusion of cardiotonic drugs (ATC C01CA Adrenergic and dopaminergic agents) (e.g., norepinephrine** (C01CA03)) when mean arterial pressure persistently drops below 60–65 mm Hg helps reduce the risk of damage to ischemia-sensitive organs (brain, heart, kidneys). It is especially important to prevent hypotension during temporary arterial clipping. When performing intraoperative ICP monitoring, target a cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) of at least 60 mm Hg.
It is recommended to correct persistent hypertension to prevent rebleeding [263, 264].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: it is advisable to avoid a sustained increase in systolic blood pressure above 160–180 mm Hg intraoperatively, correcting hypertension with calcium channel blockers (e.g., nimodipine**) (C08CA), alpha-adrenoceptor blockers (e.g., urapidil**) (C02CA), organic nitrates (C01DA), etc., taking into account the need to maintain CPP sufficient for brain perfusion.
3.2.3 Postoperative management of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage after aneurysm clipping/coiling
The main goals of intensive care in patients after aneurysm occlusion are the correction of postoperative complications (cerebral and somatic). The most frequent cerebral causes of a severe postoperative course are progressive cerebral vasospasm, delayed cerebral ischemia and cerebral edema, and the development of resorptive hydrocephalus. Patient management and treatment after surgery follow the same principles as before surgery, but with certain specific features.
Basic Principles of Intensive Care
It is recommended to elevate the head of the bed by 30° [123, 265, 266].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to initiate early enteral nutrition (within 24–48 hours) postoperatively [123, 275].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to implement pressure ulcer prevention for immobile patients (turning patients in bed, anti-decubitus mattress, hygiene) [123, 276].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Prevention of Lower Extremity Vein Thrombosis and Venous Thromboembolism
It is recommended to prophylactically administer low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) (B01AB Heparin group) subcutaneously no earlier than 24 hours after microsurgical or endovascular aneurysm occlusion [128].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: The decision on the exact timing of starting anticoagulant prophylaxis and the choice of dose is determined individually, taking into account the specific features of the neurosurgical intervention.
It is recommended to use intermittent pneumatic compression or compression stockings if patients have contraindications to LMWH (B01AB Heparin group) [17, 129, 131].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Management of Systemic Hemodynamic Parameters and Volemia after Aneurysm Occlusion
It is recommended to immediately correct arterial hypotension at any stage of treatment [17, 32].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to administer fluids to achieve and maintain euvolemia, defined as a positive daily fluid balance of 500–750 ml [273], with a preference for balanced crystalloid solutions (B05BB Solutions affecting the water-electrolyte balance) [17, 27].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Correction of Anemia
It is recommended to transfuse packed red blood cells (B05AX) when hemoglobin levels are 7 g/dl or lower [127, 175, 265].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Respiratory Support
It is recommended to maintain SpO2 ≥92% [123, 176].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to achieve target mechanical ventilation parameters: PaCO2 = 35–45 mm Hg, PaO2 ≥80 mm Hg [123, 181].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform early tracheostomy in case of expected prolonged mechanical ventilation [123, 181].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Control of Blood Sodium Concentration
It is recommended for patients with aneurysmal SAH to maintain plasma sodium values within normal limits (135–145 mmol/L). Hyponatremia correction is recommended when plasma sodium concentration is <135 mmol/L [123, 181].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Hyponatremia can develop both as a result of the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) and cerebral salt-wasting syndrome (CSW) [279]. Patients with SIADH are euvolemic, and hyponatremia develops against the background of water retention. Fluid restriction is undesirable in patients with aneurysmal SAH. In CSW, hyponatremia is caused by Na losses against the background of excessive secretion of natriuretic peptides. CSW is characterized by an increased rate of diuresis. The main difference between SIADH and CSW is the increased diuresis rate in CSW.
It is recommended for patients with SIADH to perform intravenous infusion of 3% sodium chloride (Compounded sterile medications, OFS.1.8.0006) at a rate of 1–3 ml/kg until normal plasma sodium values are reached (sodium monitoring 2 hours after the start of infusion, then every 2 hours until target values are reached) [16, 270].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended for patients with CSW to conduct infusion therapy with 0.9% sodium chloride** (B05BB01) to correct hypovolemia and maintain euvolemia. In case of severe hyponatremia, 0.9% sodium chloride** (B05BB01) is combined with 3% sodium chloride (Compounded sterile medications, OFS.1.8.0006), and #fludrocortisone** (H02AA02) 0.3 mg/day is prescribed [16, 184, 280].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Execution of External Ventricular Drainage
It is recommended to monitor the adequate functioning of EVD (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) [188].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to clamp the EVD (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) during any positional changes, patient transport, etc. [181, 228, 229].
GCR CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to use a set of measures aimed at standardizing the insertion, use, and maintenance of EVD (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) to reduce the incidence of drain-associated ventriculitis [236].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: EVD insertion (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) is performed under sterile operating room conditions, a burr hole is made at standard points (Kocher's point, Dandy's point), puncture of the anterior or posterior horn of the lateral ventricle is performed, the ventricular end of the catheter is inserted to a depth of 5–7 cm, the outer end of the catheter is brought out through a stab incision, secured to the skin with sutures, and connected to a sterile CSF collector (lumbar reservoir) [283]. See section "Insertion of External Ventricular Drainage".
Prevention and Treatment of Cerebral Vasospasm and Cerebral Ischemia
Tactics for conscious patients with a stable neurological status
It is recommended to perform transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCD) monitoring in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage at least once a day until linear blood flow velocity (LBFV) stabilizes (approximately 10–14 days post-SAH) [17, 181, 2288].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to closely monitor the patient's condition when the mean LBFV in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) is 120–200 cm/s and the Lindegaard index is 3–6 [27].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to initiate hyperdynamic therapy for cerebral vasospasm when the mean LBFV in the MCA is >200 cm/s and/or the Lindegaard index is >6 [17].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Management of neurological deterioration in conscious patients
It is recommended to perform differential diagnosis of the causes of worsening neurological symptoms [17, 181, 273].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Differential diagnosis between cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia is based on:
a. Clinical presentation: delayed cerebral ischemia is defined as the onset of new focal neurological deficits or a decrease of at least 2 points on the Glasgow Coma Scale (either in the total score or in any of its individual components, such as eye opening, verbal response, or motor response on either side). This must last for at least 1 hour, not be apparent immediately after aneurysm occlusion, and not be explained by other causes [273, 274].
b. Neuroimaging methods: brain CT, CTA, brain CT perfusion, DSA. Manifestations of cerebral vasospasm and ischemia will be confirmed by areas of decreased density corresponding to specific vascular territories on CT, hypoperfusion zones on brain CT perfusion (cerebral blood flow <25 mL/100 g/min, cerebral blood volume <1.5 mL/100 g, and/or mean transit time >6.5 seconds), and visualization of cerebral vasospasm on CTA or DSA. Severe angiospasm is defined as narrowing of at least 70% compared to the baseline level on DSA or CTA angiograms [106, 274, 275]. Other causes of deterioration are also excluded: intracranial hematoma, hydrocephalus, etc.
c. Emergency TCD: an increase in mean blood flow velocity in the MCA by more than 50 cm/s within 24 hours, mean LBFV exceeding 200 cm/s in the MCA, or a Lindegaard index >6 [287].
It is recommended to initiate hyperdynamic therapy for cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia if the aforementioned diagnostic methods are unavailable within 1–2 hours [17].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Management in unconscious patients and/or during sedation
It is recommended to perform transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCD) monitoring at least once a day [17, 181, 275].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform emergency transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCD) monitoring when signs indicating progressive cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia appear [17, 272, 276].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: indirect signs of worsening cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia in an unconscious (sedated) patient include: a decrease in the neurological status score on the GCS by 1 or more points, the appearance of pupillary asymmetry, any additional focal neurological deficit, Cushing's triad, and elevated ICP if monitoring is in place.
Cerebral vasospasm and the development of delayed cerebral ischemia are confirmed by:
A. TCD
B. Neuroimaging methods: brain CT, SCT angiography, SCT perfusion, DSA.
Hyperdynamic therapy for cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia
Considered as the first-line treatment for cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia [288]. It involves increasing mean arterial pressure (MAP) to improve cerebral perfusion. Therapy includes the use of vasopressors (ATC C01CA Adrenergic and dopaminergic agents) (norepinephrine** (C01CA)), while maintaining euvolemia with a combination of crystalloid (B05BB Solutions affecting the electrolyte balance) or colloid (B05AA Blood substitutes and plasma protein fractions) solutions (human #albumin** solution (B05AA)) [17, 184].
If cardiac output decreases, it is recommended to use inotropic agents (dobutamine** (C01CA)), in the absence of an effect from isolated vasopressor use (ATC C01CA Adrenergic and dopaminergic agents) or decreased cardiac output. Hyperdynamic therapy may lead to pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary edema, patient hypervolemia, myocardial contractility impairment, and cardiac arrhythmias. Echocardiography is necessary when cardiac complications are suspected. An elevated troponin level, as well as electrocardiographic signs of ischemic injury, are grounds for immediate correction of target MAP parameters and consultation with a cardiologist.
Recommended hyperdynamic therapy algorithm:
It is recommended to continuously administer 0.9% sodium chloride** (or a balanced crystalloid solution**) (B05BB Solutions affecting the electrolyte balance) intravenously at 30 mL/kg per day [182].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to achieve a systolic blood pressure of 160–200 mm Hg [289]
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to prescribe human #albumin** (B05AA) when blood albumin levels drop below 30 g/L [290].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: recommended doses for 25% human #albumin**: 0.625 g/kg/day for 7 days; 1.25 g/kg/day for 7 days; 1.875 g/kg/day for 7 days; 2.5 g/kg/day for 7 days
It is recommended to use adrenergic and dopaminergic agents (C01CA) to increase blood pressure [17]. [275][276]
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to use norepinephrine** (C01CA) in dosages corresponding to the instructions for use for rapid restoration and maintenance of blood pressure during acute hypotension [17]. [275][276]
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to use dobutamine** (C01CA) in dosages corresponding to the instructions for use in cases of acute heart failure and decompensation of chronic heart failure (reduced myocardial contractility) [17]. [275][276]
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Endovascular treatment of cerebral vasospasm via intra-arterial administration of calcium channel blockers after aneurysm clipping/coiling
Direct cerebral angiography is recommended if severe cerebral vasospasm is detected based on clinical presentation and transcranial Doppler monitoring data (TCD) [292–294].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Signs of severe cerebral vasospasm: mean linear LBFV in the M1 segment of the MCA according to TCD data greater than 200 cm/s or a Lindegaard index >6; appearance of focal neurological deficit and decreased level of consciousness.
It is recommended to perform intra-arterial (endovascular) administration of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) into the internal carotid artery (ICA) territory in cases of signs of severe cerebral vasospasm and ineffectiveness of medical treatments, provided technical capabilities are available [293–295].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Considering the use of off-label drugs a medical board (consilium) must be held indicating the necessity of this type of treatment for life-saving indications!
It is not recommended to administer intra-arterial CCBs in cases of incomplete occlusion of the ruptured aneurysm, extensive ischemic lesions (involving multiple lobes) in the territory of the spastic artery, severe infectious and inflammatory processes (meningitis, pneumonia, sepsis, etc.), acute kidney injury or severe chronic kidney disease, severe cardiac disorders (acute or recent myocardial infarction, 2nd–3rd degree A-V block, marked bradycardia (heart rate less than 50 beats/min), atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation), or individual intolerance (hypersensitivity) to CCBs or contrast media [293–295].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to administer a dose of 50–100 mg of #verapamil** or 1–2 mg of #nimodipine** into a single carotid territory when performing intra-arterial CCB administration [294, 295].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: The following are used for therapy: #verapamil** (C08DA01) 0.25 mg/mL (5 mg per 25 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride** (B05BB01)) at an average rate of 10 mL/min or #nimodipine** (C08CA06) 0.01 mg/mL (after dilution in 0.9% sodium chloride** (B05BB01)). Infusion into the ICA is performed slowly. The infusion rate depends on hemodynamic parameters and ICP.
The procedure of intra-arterial administration of calcium channel blockers may be repeated multiple times, according to indications and depending on the patient's condition, with an interval of at least 8 hours.
It is not recommended to perform intra-arterial CCB administration if ICP rises above 18–20 mm Hg [293–295].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Intraarterial administration of CCBs is accompanied by a temporary (10–30 min) increase in ICP, which normalizes spontaneously. In patients with ICP exceeding 18 mm Hg, the procedure carries a risk of axial shift (herniation). If the patient is undergoing medicinal sedation at the time of the procedure, intraoperative ICP monitoring is indicated. If ICP rises above 18–20 mm Hg, osmotherapy and/or placement/opening of an external ventricular drain (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) may be required. If high ICP cannot be controlled, the intraarterial calcium channel blocker administration procedure is terminated.
It is recommended to refrain from repeated intraarterial administration of CCBs if the patient's clinical and angiographic condition improves [293–295].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: The criteria for terminating intraarterial CCB administration are the presence of at least two of the following factors:
A. Improvement in the patient's neurological status.
B. Decrease in mean flow velocity (MFV) according to transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) (below 200 cm/s).
C. Absence of cerebral vasospasm progression noted upon comparison of at least two consecutive angiographic studies.
Intracranial hypertension in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
Intracranial pressure monitoring
The causes of intracranial hypertension in patients with aneurysmal SAH include: mass effect exerted by the extravasated blood, hydrocephalus, and delayed cerebral ischemia [296].
Immediate EVD placement and cerebrospinal fluid drainage (A16.23.001 Ventricular puncture of the brain, A16.23.047 External drainage of lateral ventricles of the brain) (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) is necessary in patients with aneurysmal SAH who exhibit a decreased level of alertness or impaired consciousness and signs of hydrocephalus and/or ICH on CT imaging [297].
It is recommended to monitor intracranial pressure using the strain-gauge method via an EVD (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) provided it functions adequately [164, 283].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to place a parenchymal ICP sensor (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) if technically feasible, in patients with a pre-surgical severity score of 4–5 on the Hunt-Hess scale (GCS <9 points) or those requiring continuous medicinal sedation with a high risk of developing cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia [122, 123, 298].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
General principles of intracranial hypertension management in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage
It is recommended to initiate intracranial hypertension therapy when intracranial pressure exceeds 18–20 mm Hg [122, 123, 298].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to elevate the head of the bed by 30–40° [274].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to drain cerebrospinal fluid via an EVD (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) in patients with an EVD and elevated intracranial pressure [16, 227, 229].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to administer sedation to patients receiving intensive care (propofol** (N01AX10) at dosages corresponding to the instructions for use, if necessary – #dexmedetomidine (N05CM18) intravenous infusion at a rate of 0.2–0.7 mcg/kg/h titrated to effect), and analgesia (fentanyl** (N01AH01) at dosages corresponding to the instructions for use) [300][121, 123].
Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of recommendation C (level of evidence – 4) – for #dexmedetomidine
Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 5Level of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5) – for propofol** and fentanyl**
It is recommended to perform osmotherapy using osmotic diuretics in patients with cerebral edema (and elevated ICP) (15% mannitol** ((B05BC Solutions with osmotic diuretic action) in accordance with the instructions, or 10% sodium chloride solution (Sterile compounding pharmacy drug preparations, OFS.1.8.0006), single dose 20–50 ml into a central vein [120, 124, 126].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is not recommended to perform hyperventilation in patients with elevated ICP and aneurysmal SAH [121, 123].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to maintain CPP ≥60 mm Hg [121, 123].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended , during osmotherapy, to monitor fluid balance, urine output rate, and regularly evaluate blood sodium concentration and plasma osmolality [17, 121].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to discontinue ICP monitoring 48–72 hours after ICP normalization and cessation of intensive care aimed at correcting intracranial hypertension [123, 285].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform secondary decompressive craniectomy in the presence of signs of refractory intracranial hypertension [3, 5, 117].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Intracranial hypertension is considered refractory when it does not respond to conservative therapy and ICP remains above 18–20 mm Hg [122,123,243,299].
Evaluation of patient treatment outcomes
It is recommended that patients who have undergone SAH be evaluated for treatment outcomes using the Glasgow Outcome Scale or modified Rankin Scale (Appendix G) no earlier than 6 months after SAH [16, 174, 175, 299].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: earlier evaluation (at patient discharge or at other selected time points) is possible as an intermediate stage.
3.3 Treatment of patients with arteriovenous malformation
3.3.1 General recommendations
There are three treatment methods for AVMs: microsurgical resection, endovascular embolization, and radiosurgery. Each has its own advantages and disadvantages. At the same time, all of them aim to prevent hemorrhages, which requires the complete exclusion of the malformation from the bloodstream [95].
In the acute period of AVM rupture, surgical treatment of the malformation itself is often not required due to the low risk of re-rupture; the strategy is mainly based on the volume of intracranial hemorrhage, the degree of brain displacement, and the compression of CSF pathways [31, 288].
It is recommended in cases of arteriovenous malformation rupture with a supratentorial intracerebral hematoma volume of less than 30 ml, subtentorial intracerebral hematoma volume of less than 15 ml, absence of obstructive hydrocephalus and marked cerebral edema, to perform elective treatment of the arteriovenous malformation in specialized neurosurgical centers where a multimodal approach is available [95, 289]
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform elective treatment of unruptured arteriovenous malformations in specialized neurosurgical centers where a multimodal approach is available [95].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
3.3.2 Surgical treatment of patients with arteriovenous malformation
It is recommended to perform emergency neurosurgical intervention for the rupture of a supratentorial arteriovenous malformation with the formation of an intracerebral hematoma volume exceeding 30 ml [290, 291, 305].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Emergency surgical treatment is possible for an ICH volume of less than 30 ml in the presence of massive perifocal edema with the development of lateral shift greater than 5 mm or axial shift.
In patients over 80 years of age, in the presence of severe comorbid pathology, or in case of impaired consciousness down to coma (3–8 points on the GCS), the decision to perform emergency neurosurgery should be made by a medical board taking into account the risks of the natural disease course and perioperative complications [305].
It is recommended to perform emergency surgery for hemorrhage from a subtentorial arteriovenous malformation in the presence of a cerebellar intracerebral hematoma volume exceeding 15 ml [306].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: In patients over 80 years of age, in the presence of severe comorbid pathology, or in case of impaired consciousness down to coma (3–8 points on the GCS), the decision to perform emergency neurosurgery should be made by a medical board taking into account the risks of the natural disease course and perioperative complications [306].
It is recommended to urgently place an external ventricular drain (A16.23.001 Ventricular puncture of the brain, A16.23.047 External drainage of lateral ventricles of the brain) (Neurosurgical system for external drainage, CSF drainage and monitoring) upon rupture of an arteriovenous malformation and development of obstructive hydrocephalus [305].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended during emergency surgery to excise the intracerebral hematoma together with the arteriovenous malformation if the malformation is small in size, compact in structure, in an accessible location, and associated with a high risk of re-rupture [291, 306, 307].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended during emergency intervention to remove only the intracerebral hematoma without excision of the arteriovenous malformation in malformations with a Spetzler-Martin grade > 3 [305].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform decompressive craniectomy in combination with intracerebral hematoma removal in cases of severe intracranial hypertension [291, 306, 307].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform delayed resection or embolization of the arteriovenous malformation (2–6 weeks after hemorrhage) in patients with a supratentorial intracerebral hematoma volume < 30 mL, subtentorial intracerebral hematoma volume < 15 mL, and absence of obstructive hydrocephalus [291, 295–297].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: In specialized neurosurgical centers with extensive experience in emergency vascular neurosurgery, early AVM removal in the acute period of hemorrhage is possible [307].
It is recommended to urgently perform embolization or resection of a ruptured arteriovenous malformation in the presence of hemodynamic or intranidal aneurysms, localized varices or stenosis of the draining vein, and high-flow fistulas due to the higher risk of re-rupture of such malformations [297, 298, 309, 310].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Embolization of arteriovenous malformations
It is recommended to perform preoperative endovascular occlusion of arteriovenous malformation vessels (A16.12.053.001 according to the medical nomenclature) prior to AVM resection when it has multiple afferent blood supplies, high-flow fistulas, and a hard-to-reach location [298, 299, 310, 311].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform total selective cerebral angiography covering all vascular territories for an arteriovenous malformation [313].
Leveled of Evidence CLevel of Data Reliability 2Level of evidence C (level of data reliability – 2)
Comments: It is necessary to examine both carotid territories (separately ICA and ECA), as well as the vertebrobasilar system from both vertebral arteries. Special attention should be paid to visualizing potential sources of hemorrhage: flow-related and intranidal aneurysms, arteriovenous fistulas within the AVM structure, and varicose-altered draining veins.
It is recommended to perform total embolization in a single stage for Spetzler-Martin grade 1–2 arteriovenous malformations during endovascular vessel occlusion (A16.12.053.001 Endovascular occlusion of arteriovenous malformation vessels) [314].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: if a direct high-flow fistula is present within the AVM structure, treatment can be divided into multiple stages.
It is recommended to perform multi-stage embolization for Spetzler-Martin grade 3 or higher arteriovenous malformations during endovascular vessel occlusion (A16.12.053.001 Endovascular occlusion of arteriovenous malformation vessels) [315].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Embolization of more than 60% of large AVMs in a single stage should be avoided.
It is recommended to use adhesive (synthetic tissue medical adhesive, Glubran 2 surgical glue) and non-adhesive (liquid embolic system) embolic agents in the endovascular treatment of arteriovenous malformations [315].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations
It is recommended to use external beam radiation therapy (A07.23.001 External beam radiation therapy for central nervous system and brain lesions) for a ruptured arteriovenous malformation only when microsurgical and endovascular treatments are not feasible [95].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to use external beam radiation therapy (A07.23.001 External beam radiation therapy for central nervous system and brain lesions) in cases of incomplete resection or embolization of an arteriovenous malformation [289, 302, 303].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform external beam radiation therapy (A07.23.001 External beam radiation therapy for central nervous system and brain lesions) for an arteriovenous malformation no earlier than 6–12 weeks after hemorrhage [292, 302].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform dynamic brain magnetic resonance imaging to assess the degree of arteriovenous malformation obliteration after radiosurgery [317].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: If MRI is not feasible for dynamic assessment of the radicality of malformation closure, CT angiography is acceptable.
It is recommended to perform total selective cerebral angiography to confirm complete obliteration when total malformation occlusion is observed on brain MRI following radiosurgery [95, 305].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to repeat irradiation of an arteriovenous malformation in case of its incomplete obliteration 3–5 years after radiosurgery [315].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
3.3.3 Postoperative patient management
It is recommended for patients with small and medium-sized arteriovenous malformations and without surgical complications to undergo early awakening and extubation [319].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to wake the patient up after performing a follow-up brain computed tomography scan in cases of large-sized arteriovenous malformations or AVMs with intraoperative complications [319].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to monitor blood pressure in the postoperative period after exclusion of the arteriovenous malformation [25, 306].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to maintain systolic blood pressure below 140 mm Hg in patients during the postoperative period following the exclusion of an arteriovenous malformation from the bloodstream [25, 306, 307]
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform a follow-up brain computed tomography scan within 24 hours after surgery for an arteriovenous malformation [25].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform cerebral computed tomography angiography or total selective cerebral angiography within 7 days after surgery to rule out residual arteriovenous malformation after resection [95].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended upon detection of a residual arteriovenous malformation on postoperative total selective cerebral angiography to perform its further exclusion from the bloodstream via resection (A16.12.053 Removal of arteriovenous malformation), embolization (A16.12.053.001 Endovascular occlusion of arteriovenous malformation vessels), or radiosurgery (A07.23.001 External beam radiation therapy for central nervous system and brain lesions) [95, 303, 304, 308].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is not recommended to routinely prescribe anticonvulsants after arteriovenous malformation removal [25].
GCR BLE 4Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to prescribe antiepileptic drugs in the postoperative period to patients who have developed new-onset epileptic seizures [323].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: The duration of therapy is determined individually.
It is recommended to continue anticonvulsant therapy in the postoperative period for patients with a history of epileptic seizures [324][323]
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
It is recommended to provide medical rehabilitation services for patients with central nervous system diseases in case of hemorrhagic stroke at all stages of treatment to improve the disease outcome under conservative and surgical management, including therapeutic exercise for central nervous system and brain diseases, and/or therapeutic exercise using apparatuses and simulators for central nervous system and brain diseases, and/or postural correction, and/or ergotherapy, and/or speech-language pathology assessment for dysphagia, and/or speech-language pathology procedures for aphasia, and/or speech-language pathology procedures for dysarthria no later than 48 hours from the time of hospital admission [325].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: rehabilitation begins no later than 48 hours of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) or intensive care and reanimation unit and continues in the inpatient neurology or neurosurgery department until discharge from the medical facility [326–329]. Afterward, the patient is routed to subsequent stages of rehabilitation treatment depending on the degree of functional recovery and independence in daily life, established in accordance with the gradations of the rehabilitation routing scale models.
In the early recovery period (up to 6 months), the patient is provided with 1–3 courses of rehabilitation treatment in medical rehabilitation departments for patients with CNS diseases in inpatient, day-care, or outpatient settings, including the use of telemedicine technologies.
In the late recovery period (after 6 months), the decision to continue the rehabilitation program is made within the framework of regional standards for developing an individualized medical rehabilitation program [329].
4.1 Rehabilitation of patients in the acute period of hemorrhagic stroke (days 3–28)
In addition to the primary neurological deficit resulting from primary brain injury due to hemorrhagic stroke, patients are at high risk of developing post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) as a side effect of specific intensive care, particularly prolonged immobilization, sedation, and mechanical ventilation [326, 327].
The main syndromes forming the clinical picture of PICS are:
✓ critical illness polymyoneuropathy: diffuse reduction of limb strength;
✓ respiratory polymyoneuropathy leading to prolonged mechanical ventilation due to weakness of the respiratory muscles and diaphragm;
✓ reduced exercise tolerance (fatigue);
✓ complications of forced positioning (bedrest and prone positioning): brachial plexus injury, foot drop and early plantar flexion contractures, pressure ulcers;
✓ orthostatic intolerance when sitting up;
✓ impaired urinary passage and predisposition to urolithiasis;
✓ bowel dysfunction (constipation);
✓ complications of learned non-use: dysphagia due to tracheoesophageal dissociation;
✓ delirium;
✓ chronic pain syndrome (musculoskeletal, neuropathic);
✓ emotional and cognitive impairment (depression, memory impairment);
✓ dyssomnia.
This necessitates the prevention of PICS as a basic primary technology of early rehabilitation. To this end, the "ReabIT" technology [332] is used, implemented by the multidisciplinary rehabilitation team (MDRT) of the early medical rehabilitation department and the primary vascular center (ICU of the PVC). Within the framework of these guidelines, we present the main points and comments on the specifics of their application in patients with SAH and ICH.
It is recommended to assess the severity of post-intensive care syndrome every 24 hours using the PICS severity index by members of the multidisciplinary rehabilitation team in patients with hemorrhagic stroke during their ICU stay for its diagnosis and monitoring of dynamics during rehabilitation treatment [326, 329, 330].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: A complete list of clinimetric scales, reference values, and specialties of MDRT members responsible for monitoring and interpreting data using the respective scale are presented in the relevant clinical guidelines [332]. The PICS index is calculated by summing the ranked symptoms established by MDRT members according to their profile (Appendix G16). A total score ranging from 0 to 10 reflects both the presence of PICS and its severity, as well as the effectiveness of rehabilitation measures. When interpreting PICS manifestations, it should be taken into account that such PICS modalities as motor deficit, swallowing disorders, cognitive impairment, and decreased gravitational gradient are manifestations of the primary brain and spinal cord lesion. In this case, they should not be included in the calculation. In the differential diagnosis of movement disorders, significant symptoms on the unaffected side are recorded; for example, the presence of critical illness polymyoneuropathy is confirmed if the sum of strength scores on the healthy side did not exceed 8 points. The advantages of other methods for assessing PICS severity have not been proven [335–338].
It is recommended to implement the prevention of post-intensive care syndrome in patients with hemorrhagic stroke receiving care in the ICU for more than 48 hours, regardless of the type of surgical intervention, severity of condition, and respiratory status, to prevent PICS [326, 330].
GPP CLE 4Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) level C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: current guidelines for the management of HS are evasive [5, 27] regarding the timing and types of rehabilitation initiation, but insist on early initiation. From the perspective of general pathophysiology of acute cerebral insufficiency, the prevention of learned non-use syndrome is justified for both PICS and acute focal deficit [332].
It is recommended to conduct an individual rehabilitation program in the ICU daily, starting from 3 days from the onset of the disease, lasting at least 1 hour but not more than 3 hours, taking into account the consciousness status and mobility level of the patient with hemorrhagic stroke to prevent the development of post-intensive care syndrome [339].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: depending on the patient's ability to participate in rehabilitation measures (severity of condition, level of consciousness), rehabilitation is carried out in active, passive, and active-passive modes. The rehabilitation program should include a combination of kinesiologic maneuver techniques (positioning, verticalization and mobility, cycle ergometer loads, and electroneuromyostimulation), as well as practices by medical psychologists, occupational therapists, and medical speech therapists [326, 327].
It is not recommended to initiate rehabilitation measures for mobilization and verticalizing positioning in the ICU earlier than 24 hours from the disease onset or postoperative period in patients with hemorrhagic stroke, as well as in the presence of absolute and without considering relative contraindications due to the risk of cerebral hemodynamic disorders and progression of vasospasm [341, 342].
LoR BGoE 2Level of Recommendation B (Grade of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to discontinue rehabilitation procedures when monitored parameters deviate from normal values—the development of STOP signals—in patients with hemorrhagic stroke at any stage of rehabilitation treatment in order to prevent complications [330, 344].
GPP CLE 4Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) level C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: when contraindications (STOP signals) appear (Appendix B3) at the moment of verticalization, mobilization, or any other rehabilitation procedure, this procedure should be stopped immediately. If stop signals developed at the moment of verticalization, it should be discontinued and the patient returned to the previous position (lowered by 20°) or lowered to 0° without stopping at elevation angles. Contact patients should be thoroughly explained the essence and expected sensations of the planned procedure so as not to provoke undesirable autonomic reactions caused by fear and uncertainty, especially in children. The level of evidence of these signs does not exceed level C, but obtaining higher-quality arguments in this context is difficult due to ethical considerations regarding the formation of a control group in such studies.
It is recommended to perform a "passive leg raising test" in patients with hemorrhagic stroke in the ICU before each session of mobilization and verticalizing positioning maneuvers to determine the risk of hemodynamic STOP signals during mobilization and verticalizing positioning [318, 332, 333].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5Level of Evidence C (reliability of evidence – 5)
Comments: on the one hand, a positive passive leg raising test indicates hypovolemia, which during the verticalization maneuver will lead to orthostatic intolerance, which is highly undesirable in any emergency condition. On the other hand, this situation should not be considered an absolute contraindication to mobilization. The causes and a plan for restoring euvolemia should be evaluated, after which, upon obtaining a negative result on retesting, the implementation of the rehabilitation plan should be resumed.
It is recommended to perform non-verticalizing positioning in patients with hemorrhagic stroke in the ICU during the first 24 hours of stay by changing the position of the patient's limbs and torso relative to the horizontal plane, depending on the verticalization status, at least every 2 hours with a break for night sleep to prevent complications of therapeutic immobilization [333, 334].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: unlike mobilization, non-verticalizing [332] positioning has no absolute contraindications and should be used from the 1st day regardless of the scope of other early rehabilitation modalities by the on-duty medical staff. Positioning is used for gravitational stimulation when raising the head of the bed, so the head of the bed should always be elevated no lower than 30°. Patients are assisted in successively assuming lying positions (on the right and/or left side or on the back), with an elevated head of the bed, or sitting. Positioning must necessarily include turns onto paralyzed limbs for proprioceptive stimulation and prevention of the "learned non-use" syndrome.
It is recommended to conduct daily verticalization maneuvers followed by verticalizing positioning in patients with hemorrhagic stroke in the ICU, starting from a high head elevation (30–60°) to a sitting position with lowered legs and standing near the bed, with the goal of stepwise restoration of the gravitational gradient [349].
GPP BLOE 1Level of Evidence B (Level of Data Reliability – 1)
Comments: Standing is the best body position for effective patient breathing and maintaining lung volume [334, 336]. The higher the gravitational gradient and the duration of the patient's stay in it, the lower the risk of aspiration, pressure ulcers, polyneuromyopathy, contractures, pathological (painful) sensitization, and other factors of PICS. Patients on spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation in any mode should aim to maintain the longest possible anti-gravity vertical positioning at the level of the gravitational gradient achieved during passive verticalization. In communicative patients, the gravitational gradient is determined by the patient's individual request. Such patients should be taught to lean forward—in this position, gravity improves the drainage of secretions from the posteroinferior segments of the lungs. Verticalization procedures should be performed 3 times a day for 30 minutes. The duration of the procedure depends on tolerance, but should be at least 15 minutes. In any position, the head should be in the midline position to prevent impaired venous outflow, secondary increases in intracranial and intraocular pressure, and an increase in pathological muscle tone in paretic limbs [351].
It is recommended that patients with hemorrhagic stroke in the ICU begin active-passive mobilization, including verticalization and verticalizing positioning, no earlier than 24 hours and no later than 72 hours from the onset of the emergency condition, or immediately after establishing the absence of contraindications to starting or continuing mobilization, in order to prevent immobilization complications [327, 328, 341].
GRC BLEL 4Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: early mobilization is an element of the rehabilitation process for stroke patients in the ICU [343]. A meta-analysis of data from sixteen studies involving 1,757 patients with SAH showed that early mobilization improved the mRS score at discharge (mean difference -1.39, 95% CI from -2.51 to -0.28, I2 = 86%) and at 3 months (mean difference -1.10, 95% CI from -1.54 to -0.66, I2 = 7%). Early mobilization was associated with a reduction in the incidence of cerebral vasospasm, both radiologic (OR 0.66, 95% CI from 0.45 to 0.96, I2 = 7%) and clinical (OR 0.44, 95% CI from 0.27 to 0.72, I2 = 8%); 6% of mobilization sessions included adverse events, mainly hemodynamic changes. The duration of mobilization is recommended to be from 15 to 45 minutes, divided into one, two, or three sessions per day. The main focus of early mobilization should be on sitting, standing, and walking activities.
It is recommended that patients with hemorrhagic stroke, starting from 72 hours from the onset of the disease, depending on the severity of their condition, undergo kinesiotherapy mobilization maneuvers: active-passive movements in all joints with stretching, active-passive cyclotherapy, assisted sitting transitions, sitting balance, transfers to a chair, standing balance, and stepping in place to initiate neurorepair processes and prevent PICS [326, 329, 349].
GGR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: Mobilization is a type of rehabilitation intervention that facilitates patient movement and increases energy expenditure to improve outcomes [353].
Passive mobilization [349] for non-communicative patients consists of a series of 10 repeated passive movements (passive joint gymnastics) in each of the main joints with very light stretching at the extremes of the physiological range of motion at least 2 times a day. Passive kinesiotherapy can also be performed using cyclotherapy with a bedside cycle ergometer (9140790) for the lower/upper extremities with reverse motion capability and other mechanical exercise devices (140790) that provide cyclic training for individual joints and have sensors to determine the patient's contribution in active-passive mode. Active mobilization involves training the patient and monitoring the execution of available independent movements in all joints (active joint gymnastics) at a frequency of 10 repetitions 3–6 times a day [325, 340].
It is recommended to use additional methods of cerebral status monitoring during verticalization and mobilization maneuvers in patients with hemorrhagic stroke: measuring regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2), with timely identification of stop signals in the form of a decrease in cerebral blood flow velocity resulting from increasing angiospasm or intracranial hypertension [355].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: unlike other nosological forms of acute cerebral insufficiency, hemorrhagic stroke carries a higher risk of cortical ischemia and herniation syndrome provoked by verticalization and physical activity. An analysis of observations of 148 patients with SAH before and during mobilization revealed a critical rSO2 value of 57%, at which there is a risk of complications; meanwhile, changes in rSO2 during mobilization were not associated with changes in vital signs, suggesting that rSO2 is an independent stop signal.
It is recommended to use techniques of selective respiratory training of the primary and accessory muscles of inspiration, including special static and dynamic breathing exercises, as well as manual or mechanical (VEST) percussion therapy maneuvers, in patients with hemorrhagic stroke on mechanical ventilation for the prevention of respiratory polyneuromyopathy [342, 343].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: procedures aimed at reducing dyspnea, improving tracheobronchial clearance, training skeletal muscles, and maintaining the level of self-care are indicated during the period of weaning the patient from mechanical ventilation or immediately after it; expiration using positive pressure can be used. For this purpose, it is advisable to use incentive spirometry devices, devices with high-frequency intra-/extrapulmonary oscillations, and electrical stimulation of the diaphragm and intercostal muscles. The use of respiratory rehabilitation practices in neurointensive care patients does not adversely affect intracranial pressure [357]. To restore vocal cord function and the possibility of verbal communication, the use of a speaking valve for a tracheostomy tube is effective [358], as it creates useful expiratory resistance and helps improve the patient's emotional status [345, 346].
It is recommended to include an additional cycle of kinesiotherapy procedures (cyclotherapy, passive joint gymnastics, stretching, etc.) on the paretic side lasting at least 20 minutes at least twice a day in patients with hemorrhagic stroke and hemiparesis of any severity, starting 72 hours after disease onset or the postoperative period, to prevent the development of learned non-use syndrome [361][362].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to include exercises with individually selected, progressively increasing levels of graduated resistance: simple limb raises, limb raises with weights, and overcoming the resistance of elastic bands in communicative patients with hemorrhagic stroke to prevent muscle mass loss and reduced exercise tolerance [363].
GPR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 2)
Comments: the inclusion of resistance exercises, provided there is adequate protein intake of at least 1.3 g/kg/day [364], helps preserve muscle mass under conditions of forced immobilization of a critically ill patient. Without muscle activity, the prevention of ICU-acquired weakness is less effective even with an adequate protein-energy balance. Early initiation of enteral nutrition reduces the risk of further nutritional deficiency and supports anabolic processes. At the same time, early mobilization and physical rehabilitation must be planned. A progressive exercise regimen, ranging from passive mobilization to active strength training, should be tailored to the patient's current functional capacity. This rehabilitation strategy aims to preserve skeletal muscle integrity, improve neuromuscular function, and accelerate functional recovery.
It is recommended to consider botulinum toxin type A** injections into the muscles of the arm and/or leg in patients with hemorrhagic stroke when muscle tone increases by more than 2 points on the Ashworth scale, starting 72 hours after disease onset, to reduce spasticity and the risk of contractures [364, 365].
LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to use electrical muscle stimulation in patients with hemorrhagic stroke staying in the ICU for more than 72 hours, including under mechanical ventilation, to prevent short- and long-term complications of PICS [367].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: electrical muscle stimulation has been investigated as a treatment for the prevention of critical illness myopolyneuropathy. The treatment involves minimal joint movement and does not require patient interaction. Electrical muscle stimulation treatment administered in studies lasted 30–60 minutes daily for at least 4 days. A meta-analysis [368] including 11 randomized controlled trials involving 576 patients showed that early use of electrical muscle stimulation in intensive care unit patients reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay.
It is recommended to conduct speech therapy sessions (A 21.23.006) in patients with hemorrhagic stroke starting from 72 hours of intensive care unit stay to prevent aspiration complications associated with post-extubation dysphagia and to prepare for the restoration of normal oral nutrition [368, 375].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: the incidence of post-extubation dysphagia in intensive care unit patients is 18.3% prior to intensive care unit discharge, of which up to 80% retain signs of dysphagia at hospital discharge [356, 357]. Furthermore, "silent" aspiration was noted in 36%. In the presence of post-extubation dysphagia, swallowing rehabilitation measures should be performed under the supervision of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team speech-language pathologist [358, 359]. The essence of early medical speech therapy sessions is to maintain the swallowing reflex in conditions where it is impossible due to endotracheal intubation [375].
It is recommended to perform a multicomponent non-pharmacological intervention including mobilization, optimization of analgosedation, sleep normalization, maintenance of cognitive status and level of daily adaptation in patients with hemorrhagic stroke in the intensive care unit to reduce the risk of delirium [376–380].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5Level of Evidence C (reliability of evidence – 5)
Comments: multicomponent interventions carried out by the intensive care unit multidisciplinary rehabilitation team can minimize the risks of cognitive impairment and delirium [361, 364].
The basis for the prevention of delirium and other emotional and cognitive disorders is the implementation of the core requirements of analgosedation recommendation protocols as a primary priority in the prevention of post-intensive care syndrome [380][381][382,383].
The multicomponent rehabilitation prevention program includes simple limb movement complexes, spontaneous breathing cycles, maintaining the patient's current level of orientation in place and time, measures to ensure nighttime sleep, performing elementary self-care activities [384], and using individually selected pieces of music for no more than 45 minutes per day [367, 370].
It is recommended to implement a sleep hygiene program, including the use of eye masks and earplugs, in patients with hemorrhagic stroke, starting from the period of stay in the intensive care unit, to preserve circadian rhythms and prevent delirium [386–388].
SOR BLOE 1Strength of recommendation B (level of evidence – 1)
Comments: the intensive care unit environment, constant lighting, staff conversations, monitor alarms, respirator sounds—all these stimuli inevitably affect sleep quality. Meanwhile, ensuring sleep during the intensive care unit stay is a method of reducing the risk of cognitive impairment, including psychomotor agitation and delirium. In addition, preserving sleep architecture helps maintain the patient's positive emotional state and motivation to participate in the treatment and rehabilitation program, and also increases tolerance to muscle activity. A pooled analysis of studies demonstrated an overall reduction in the prevalence of delirium with a sleep-promoting protocol [389]. A mandatory component of the protocols is the creation of an optimal patient environment to ensure normal sleep (natural sleep markers such as a window or light/dark adjustment, avoidance of nighttime procedures, regular care breaks of 60–90 minutes). Pharmacological sleep modulation is not excluded [387]
It is recommended that patients with hemorrhagic stroke during a prolonged stay in the ICU undergo training to restore self-care skills in accordance with their age and cognitive status to prevent daily life maladaptation [389, 390].
GPP CLEL 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence – 4)
Comments: occupational therapy is a separate section of emotional and cognitive rehabilitation. In the ICU setting, an occupational therapy specialist [392] trains the patient in simple everyday activities that ensure personal self-care (personal hygiene, dressing, eating, using a bedpan, alternative and augmentative communication). The significance of occupational therapy in the structure of rehabilitation is that it helps accelerate the restoration of the patient's premorbid performance patterns, i.e., return to habitual routines, lifestyle, and social status. The inclusion of occupational therapy in the rehabilitation complex makes it possible to shorten the ICU stay, and in patients with chronic critical illness, the time of adaptation to spontaneous breathing, and prevents the development of delirium.
4.2 Rehabilitation of patients in the early convalescence period of hemorrhagic stroke (up to 180 days)
It is recommended that patients with hemorrhagic stroke and prolonged consciousness impairment detected at the 1st stage of treatment, within a period of 14 and no later than 28 days from the onset of the disease or postoperative period, undergo a scheduled in-person or teleconsultation with specialists in chronic disorders of consciousness at a level 3–4 rehabilitation center to assess status, adjust treatment, and determine routing [329, 393, 394].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended that patients with hemorrhagic stroke use the rehabilitation routing scale (https://rehabrus.ru/materialyi/professionalnyie-standartyi/) to ensure the continuity of stages in rehabilitation treatment [393].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that patients with hemorrhagic stroke at stages 2–3 of rehabilitation treatment include in their individual rehabilitation program all modalities of neurorehabilitation that have proven efficacy in other forms of focal brain lesions [395–398].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: the basis of the individualized multidisciplinary rehabilitation program (IMRP) for patients with hemorrhagic stroke should consist of basic procedures, including sessions with physical therapy specialists (kinesitherapists) [380, 384, 385], medical speech therapists [401], occupational therapy specialists [402], and medical psychologists. The program structure depends on the predominant domain of activity limitations that determines the cause of decreased independence in daily life [403]. At the initial stage, rehabilitation training lasts at least 45 minutes per day, and a corresponding increase in training intensity helps improve the patient's functional capabilities [404]. Sessions in accordance with the patient's personal needs and goals should be conducted 2–5 times a week, at least 45 minutes a day, and for at least 8 weeks. The intensity of rehabilitation training should be selected individually, fully taking into account the patient's physical strength, endurance, and cardiopulmonary function. It is recommended to personalize the parameters of exercise intensity based on the heart rate reserve percentage, the percentage of maximum heart rate, and perceived exertion.
It is recommended that patients with hemorrhagic stroke, during rehabilitation at stage 3, use remote tele-sessions to reduce the time of adaptation to daily activities [390, 407].
GGR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: post-stroke patients should have the opportunity to receive regular and continuous medical supervision, as well as the opportunity to continue rehabilitation treatment if transport limitations prevent regular visits to rehabilitation departments. Home-based training creates a sense of comfort for the patient and increases patient adherence to the procedures [407]. In addition, telerehabilitation helps reinforce the skills acquired by patients during their stay in inpatient departments.
It is recommended that patients with hemorrhagic stroke undergoing stages 2–3 of medical rehabilitation be screened for PICS (post-intensive care syndrome) and that its correction be included in rehabilitation objectives to achieve the premorbid or highest possible level of activity, participation, and quality of life indicators [408].
Level of Evidence: 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: more than 75% of patients discharged from the ICU exhibit symptoms of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) as a barrier within the rehabilitation cycle. This necessitates mandatory diagnosis of this condition and the inclusion of a specific module of basic and auxiliary rehabilitation practices in the individual patient rehabilitation program (IPRP), aimed at its elimination and the prevention of further progression.
It is recommended to prescribe a course of specific adjuvant pharmacological modulation (#Inosine + Nicotinamide + Riboflavin + Succinic acid** (N07N6E)) to adult patients with PICS at stages 2–3 of rehabilitation treatment with a predominance of the neuromuscular domain, in order to increase the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment for motor disorders [409][410–412].
LoE 3Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: dosage regimen is 10.0 mL intravenously drip once daily for 10 days.
It is recommended to prescribe a course of adjuvant pharmacological modulation (Ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate** (N07N6E)) to adult patients with PICS at stages 2–3 of rehabilitation treatment with a predominance of the emotional-cognitive domain (mild/moderate cognitive impairment) in order to increase the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatment [410–412].
LoE 3Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: few studies on the pharmacotherapy of ICH consequences have not revealed significant results. The use of fluoxetine** for the prevention of depression and the improvement of motor function has been studied for a long time, but its benefit has not been proven [397, 398]. Meanwhile, a series of studies investigating pharmacotherapy for PICS during various rehabilitation periods after acute cerebrovascular accident (ACVA) without subpopulation separation for ICH has shown that supplementing the rehabilitation program with medications targeted at motor disorders (#Inosine + Nicotinamide + Riboflavin + Succinic acid** (N07N6E)) [411] and mild/moderate cognitive impairments (Ethylmethylhydroxypyridine succinate** (N002161/01)) [394, 396] caused by the learned non-use phenomenon in PICS accelerates their recovery.
It is not recommended to restrict the habitual lifestyle of patients who have suffered a hemorrhagic stroke regarding sexual and other physical activity, with the aim of preserving their quality of life [415].
LoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: there is a gap in specialists' knowledge regarding sexual life after a stroke, which leads to this topic rarely being brought up in conversations with patients. Many people are afraid to return to sexual activity after a stroke. However, during sexual intercourse, blood pressure appears to increase only slightly (up to ≈140 mm Hg) for a short time, and then returns to baseline shortly after the onset of sexual activity in healthy adults. There is a lack of knowledge regarding physical conditioning after ICH. For example, it is unclear how to guide individuals post-ICH regarding weight lifting (lifts using large muscle groups vs. small ones, heavy lifting vs. repetitive lifting) and how much and for how long blood pressure should be allowed to rise. Furthermore, it is unclear what advice should be given regarding the potential bleeding risk associated with physical exertion when blood pressure reaches >300 mm Hg.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
5.1 Prevention of hemorrhagic stroke
It is recommended to control blood pressure, increase physical activity, monitor body weight, maintain a proper diet, and quit smoking for patients with cardiovascular diseases in order to prevent cerebrovascular catastrophes [16, 305].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance angiography of intracranial vessels every 6 months for 2 years in patients after radiosurgery [416].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform a total selective cerebral angiography 3–5 years after radiosurgery in patients to verify AVM obliteration [417–419].
Leveled of Evidence CLevel of Data Reliability 2Level of evidence C (level of data reliability – 2)
Comments: If complete obliteration is absent, the issue of repeated radiosurgery or microsurgical removal of the AVM is addressed.
The examination is a key element of standard follow-up because it:
1. Reliably confirms or excludes complete obliteration (the goal of treatment).
2. Determines further tactics (observation or re-intervention).
3. Allows for retreatment to be carried out as effectively and safely as possible.
4. Complies with international clinical guidelines.
Treatment of arterial hypertension
It is recommended to monitor and manage blood pressure in patients with hemorrhagic stroke in order to prevent recurrent hemorrhages [402, 420].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: In a study by Biffi A. et al. [421] with a mean follow-up period of 36.8 months, it was determined that recurrent hemorrhages occur more frequently with lobar hematoma location (102 out of 505 cases) than with non-lobar location (44 out of 640 cases). The frequency of hematomas in patients with inadequate blood pressure control was 84 cases per 1,000 patient-years, while with successful blood pressure control it was 49 cases per 1,000 patient-years. The risk of intracerebral hemorrhage recurrence was 3.53 (95% CI 1.65–7.54), and for non-intracerebral hemorrhage, it was 4.23 (95% CI 1.02–17.52). Systolic blood pressure was associated with an increased risk of recurrence of both lobar hemorrhage (RR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02–1.76 per 10 mm Hg increase in blood pressure) and non-lobar hemorrhage (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.03–2.30).
It is recommended to lower blood pressure to 130 and 80 mm Hg in the long term for patients with hemorrhagic stroke to prevent recurrent hemorrhages [309, 420].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: In a large prospective cohort study involving 1,145 patients with intracranial hematoma, the risk of hemorrhage recurrence was significantly higher in patients with SBP ≥120 mm Hg and DBP ≥80 mm Hg compared to patients with SBP <120 mm Hg and DBP <80 mm Hg [420]. In the PRoFESS study (Prevention Regimen for Effectively Avoiding Second Strokes), the risk of ICH during follow-up was higher in patients with SBP ≥160 mm Hg compared to those with SBP of 130 to 139 mm Hg (RR 2.07 [95% CI 1.22–3.51]), while a statistically non-significant trend toward a lower incidence of intracranial hematoma was found at SBP <130 mm Hg [422].
Anticoagulant therapy
It is recommended to resume oral anticoagulant therapy (B01AA Vitamin K antagonists) 4–8 weeks after hematoma development in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematoma and non-valvular atrial fibrillation in order to prevent thromboembolic events [136, 401, 404, 422, 423].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: To date, there is no clear consensus on the timing of prescribing oral anticoagulants (B01AA Vitamin K antagonists) in patients with hypertensive ICH and atrial fibrillation [424]. Studies in which patients were prescribed #warfarin** focused on therapy initiation 4–8 weeks after intracerebral hematoma development [139]; in the APACHE-AF trial, the mean time to therapy initiation was 46 days, the mean follow-up period was 1.9 years (IQR 1.0–3.1; 222 patient-years), and non-fatal stroke or vascular death occurred in 13 (26%) participants receiving #apixaban** (annual event rate 12.6% [95% CI 6.7–21.5]) and in 12 (24%) in the no-anticoagulant group (11.9% [95% CI 6.2–20.8]; adjusted RR 1.05 [95% CI 0.48–2.31]; p=0.90) [425]. In the open-label randomized pilot SoSTART trial, oral anticoagulants (B01AA Vitamin K antagonists) were prescribed at a median of 115 days (IQR 49–265). Recurrent intracranial hemorrhage was observed in 8% of 101 individuals in the oral anticoagulant initiation group (B01AA Vitamin K antagonists) and in 4% of 102 individuals in the oral anticoagulant avoidance group (B01AA Vitamin K antagonists) (adjusted RR 2.42 [95% CI 0.72–8.09]; p=0.152) [423].
It is recommended to perform left atrial appendage closure (A16.12.041.007 Endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage) in patients with atrial fibrillation and hemorrhagic stroke who are unsuited for anticoagulant therapy, in order to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events [290, 426].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Patients with AF and non-traumatic ICH who are unsuited for anticoagulant therapy (e.g., an unsecure aneurysm in subarachnoid hemorrhage) require consideration of surgical prevention of vascular events.
Two meta-analyses of the PROTECT-AF (WATCHMAN) and PREVAIL (WATCHMAN) trials reported that the rates of ischemic stroke, as well as hemorrhagic stroke and bleeding, were lower in the left atrial appendage closure group (A16.12.041.007 Endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage), while cardiovascular mortality was similar across all treatment groups [304, 426]. In patients with a history of non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ntICH) and atrial fibrillation, data from a small, non-randomized, retrospective cohort also showed lower cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, risk of hemorrhagic stroke, and major bleeding events with left atrial appendage closure (A16.12.041.007 Endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage) compared to standard medical therapy [428].
Other small retrospective studies have reported low event rates—similar to those in patients without ntICH and without ischemic stroke or ntICH within 30 days after left atrial appendage closure (A16.12.041.007 Endovascular occlusion of the left atrial appendage)—among patients diagnosed with cerebral amyloid angiopathy [429].
It is recommended to initiate vitamin K antagonists early (from days 6 to 14) in patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage and mechanical heart valves to prevent embolic ischemic events [428, 430].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: One study [430] in patients with mechanical heart valves reported that although the number of hemorrhagic complications significantly increased when anticoagulation was resumed at therapeutic doses prior to day 14 following hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, the calculated cumulative risk of bleeding and thromboembolism suggested that therapeutic anticoagulation may be considered in patients with mechanical heart valves as early as day 6 post-intracerebral hematoma. Another study [431] demonstrated that in patients with left ventricular assist devices, resuming anticoagulation with #warfarin** on average 14 days after cerebral hemorrhage was associated with fewer fatal and non-fatal thrombotic complications compared to resuming antiplatelet therapy alone, with a similar rate of recurrent cerebral hemorrhage.
Lipid-lowering therapy
It is recommended to prescribe non-statin lipid-lowering therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors (C10AX Other lipid-modifying agents) for patients at very high risk of hemorrhagic stroke [432–436].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: In patients with ntICH and established indications for HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor pharmacotherapy, the risks and benefits of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy regarding ntICH outcomes and recurrence versus general cardiovascular risk reduction remain unclear. There is currently no consensus on the optimal lipid management strategy following ntICH. The association of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor use with both acute outcomes and the reduction of recurrent vascular events in patients with a history of ntICH has not been established.
The SPARCL trial revealed an increased risk of ICH with high-dose atorvastatin** in the setting of very-low-density lipoproteins. Additional non-randomized observational studies found no association with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor use in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage [432, 433].
Other retrospective analyses suggest potential for improved outcomes following ntICH with the use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and a reduction in short- and long-term mortality. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to selection bias and confounding by indication in these non-randomized studies. Given this uncertainty, the decision to use HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in patients with ntICH depends on balancing the risk of ischemic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events against recurrent ntICH. Clinical trials of these agents (C10AX Other lipid-modifying agents) have not thus far suggested an increased risk of first ntICH, but have not yet studied the risk of recurrence in patients with prior intracerebral hemorrhage [434–436].
It is not recommended to routinely use non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (NSAIDs) long-term in patients with hemorrhagic stroke due to the potentially increased bleeding risk [412, 432].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: NSAID use is associated with an increased bleeding risk. The overall incidence of ntICH is low in the general population, but a large meta-analysis of observational studies identified an increased risk of hemorrhagic stroke with the use of diclofenac** and meloxicam [432]. A subsequent large meta-analysis identified an increased risk of ntICH with the use of any NSAID.610 One small short-term study of patients with ntICH found no association between NSAID use and outcomes or recurrent ntICH, but follow-up was limited to 90 days [433].
5.2 Dispensary monitoring of patients
All patients with hemorrhagic stroke undergo outpatient follow-up after hospital discharge. In accordance with Order No. 168n of the Russian Ministry of Health dated March 15, 2022, "On approval of the procedure for dispensary observation of adults," dispensary observation of patients who have suffered a hemorrhagic stroke is carried out by a general practitioner (therapist) for 24 months after inpatient medical care in medical organizations: at least once every 3 months during the first year of dispensary observation, and at least once every 6 months thereafter. Monitored health indicators include peripheral blood pressure measurement, heart rate measurement, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level testing (A09.05.028), ECG recording (A05.10.006), and—when treated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors—transaminases (A09.05.041 Determination of aspartate aminotransferase activity in blood, A09.05.04 Determination of alanine aminotransferase activity in blood) and CK (A09.05.043 Determination of creatine kinase activity in blood) (at 4 weeks after therapy initiation or in case of muscular symptoms). Additional preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitation measures may be prescribed according to medical indications. It is advisable to assess the presence/risk of spasticity in patients who have suffered a hemorrhagic stroke as part of dispensary observation and to refer them for medical rehabilitation using botulinum toxin therapy to increase the effectiveness of rehabilitation measures and improve functional recovery. Referral for a consultation (examination, consultation) with a neurologist, neurosurgeon, cardiovascular surgeon, or cardiologist is also recommended when medically indicated in cases of ineffective drug therapy (refractory symptoms, failure to reach target blood pressure, heart rate, or LDL-C levels).
It is recommended to perform the first follow-up angiographic examination (CTA or DSA after microsurgical aneurysm clipping; DSA or MRA after endovascular aneurysm coiling) within the first 3–12 months post-surgery, followed by a consultation with a neurosurgeon [208].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform repeat follow-up angiographic examinations (CTA or DSA after microsurgical aneurysm clipping; DSA or MRA after endovascular aneurysm coiling) in patients at high risk of disease recurrence, followed by a neurosurgical consultation [208].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: Patients at high risk of cerebral aneurysm recurrence include those with incomplete aneurysm exclusion from the circulation, presence of an aneurysm neck remnant, positive family history, infundibular dilations of intracranial artery ostia, and a number of aneurysm-associated conditions (genetic connective tissue disorders—autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, Marfan syndrome, etc.). The schedule for follow-up angiographic examinations is determined on an individual basis.
It is recommended to provide long-term dispensary observation for patients with arteriovenous malformations regardless of the therapeutic interventions performed and their efficacy [437, 438].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the purpose of follow-up is to detect disease progression, recurrence, and to correct epileptic syndrome. Patients who underwent surgery for AVMs are at risk of developing recurrent intracranial hemorrhage in the postoperative period. The most frequent causes of these complications are: malformation recanalization, residual malformation, and concomitant aneurysm. Duration of dispensary follow-up: after AVM eradication and in the absence of clinical manifestations—at least 5 years; in all other cases—lifelong.
Follow-up groups:
1) patients with inoperable AVMs;
2) patients with residual AVMs after interventions;
3) patients after AVM eradication (removal, total obliteration);
4) patients after radiosurgical treatment of AVMs.
In most cases, the scope of dispensary follow-up is limited to the correction of epileptiform syndrome and monitoring the status of the AVM.
It is recommended that dispensary follow-up by a neurologist for patients with hypertensive intracerebral hematomas be determined on an individual basis for each patient, for at least 6 months after surgery, followed by subsequent rehabilitation stages [37].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
5.3 Palliative care
It is recommended to provide palliative care to patients with hemorrhagic stroke and an mRS score of 5–6 to alleviate the suffering of dying patients and minimize the burden on family members [439].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: For the mRS scale, see Appendix G21.
It is recommended that when determining the survival prognosis and outcome in a post-stroke patient, physicians use the best assessment methods and clinical expertise [439].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: The best assessment method currently is the mRS. Compartmentalization of stroke care stages (stroke unit, rehabilitation unit, nursing home) can improve the quality of care in a specific location, but complicate the global perspective if communication is fragmented between various specialists (neurologists, anesthesiologists-resuscitators, neurosurgeons, physical therapists, palliative care staff, geriatricians) and institutions. Most specialists receive limited training in communication skills for patient-centered care. However, patient-centeredness as a communication strategy with stroke survivors and their families can increase satisfaction, safety, and treatment outcomes [440]. Knowledge and use of effective communication techniques is a vital core competency for improving the quality of stroke decision-making, patient and family satisfaction, and treatment outcomes (see Appendix A3).
It is recommended to make decisions regarding life-sustaining therapy or procedures based on shared treatment goals, taking into account an individual assessment of the overall benefits and risks of each treatment modality, as well as the patient's preferences and values [439].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Establishing treatment goals requires predicting the probability of survival and quality of life. Depending on the stage of the disease, the patient's health status, and stroke severity, preference-sensitive decisions may span the full spectrum of available treatments, from various forms of aggressive resuscitation to time-limited trials of therapy that are not usually considered burdensome [420, 422].
6. Organization of Medical Care
Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization
All patients with ICH must be hospitalized.
In case of suspected ICH, emergency medical care is accessed through the emergency medical services system.
The EMS service treats calls regarding ICH as high priority and ensures the fastest possible arrival of medical personnel to the patient.
The EMS service performing medical evacuation of a patient with ICH shall notify the receiving medical facility in advance that a patient with suspected ICH is expected to arrive, indicating the estimated travel time.
All patients with a suspected diagnosis of ICH undergo emergency hospitalization to a medical facility featuring a neurology department for patients with acute cerebrovascular accidents.
Organization of neurosurgical consultative care
Once a diagnosis of hemorrhagic stroke is established, all patients must be provided with a neurosurgical consultation, including via telemedicine technologies, within 60 minutes of receiving CT/MRI results to decide on the need for transferring the patient to a neurosurgical hospital.
If round-the-clock interpretation of CT results and teleradiology systems are unavailable for timely CT reporting, it is advisable to use artificial intelligence-based medical imaging software as a clinical decision support system for suspected ICH.
Telemedicine consultations are conducted with the participation of specialists (neurosurgeon, endovascular diagnostic and treatment surgeon, anesthesiologist-resuscitator, etc.).
During a telemedicine consultation, it is possible to discuss the examination plan and patient management tactics, as well as to coordinate the terms of patient transfer to another hospital.
Patients with stroke (including SAH) are provided with round-the-clock consultative care by mobile neurosurgical consultation teams based in departments providing surgical care to patients with acute cerebrovascular pathology (typically at a multidisciplinary hospital).
Patients with hemorrhagic stroke are subject to hospitalization/transfer to a medical facility equipped with:
A. Neurosurgery department;
B. Specialists experienced in direct microsurgical operations for cerebral aneurysms, AVMs, and hypertensive ICH;
C. Specialists experienced in endovascular occlusion of cerebral aneurysms and AVMs;
D. Specialists experienced in minimally invasive surgery for hypertensive ICH;
E. Radiology department equipped with devices for CT or MRI, CTA, MRA;
F. Angiographic operating room for cerebral angiography (DSA) and endovascular procedures;
G. Operating room equipped in accordance with the current Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Accidents;
H. Neuro-ICU / intensive care unit for patients with acute cerebrovascular accidents;
I. Neurology department for patients with acute cerebrovascular accidents.
Transfer of a patient with hemorrhagic stroke from a neurosurgical hospital to a neurological hospital for further rehabilitation treatment is indicated upon satisfactory healing of the postoperative wound and absence of surgical complications.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization
Patient discharge is carried out depending on their status according to the Medical Rehabilitation Routing Scale (MRRS).
MRRS score 0–1—the patient does not need continued medical rehabilitation.
MRRS score 2–3—the patient is referred to the third stage of medical rehabilitation in a medical facility of the first, second, third, and fourth groups, determined in accordance with the Procedure for Organizing Medical Rehabilitation for Adults, approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 788n dated July 31, 2020.
MRRS score 4–5—the patient is referred to the second stage of medical rehabilitation in a medical facility of the second, third, and fourth groups.
MRRS score 4–6—the patient is referred to the second stage of medical rehabilitation in a medical facility of the third and fourth groups.
Medical rehabilitation at the second and third stages is carried out in the medical rehabilitation department for patients with central nervous system disorders.
Educational activities for the public and medical professionals
Public health and healthcare organization specialists must ensure regular educational events on specialized medical care for acute cerebrovascular accidents for physicians, hospital staff, and EMS personnel to improve the quality of care.
Public health and healthcare organization specialists must develop and implement public educational activities aimed at informing the population about the stroke care system and the need for prompt seeking of emergency medical care at disease onset to improve disease outcomes.
Regional healthcare organizers must develop triage algorithms and routing protocols for patients with acute cerebrovascular accidents aimed at ensuring rapid delivery to a medical facility providing the appropriate level of care, in order to improve disease outcomes.
7. Additional Information
Large medical inpatient facilities (national and federal neurosurgical centers, regional, territorial, and republican clinical hospitals) providing specialized care to patients with hemorrhagic stroke (HS) (including subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH]), based on their own scientific research and practical experience, may develop and approve their own ("internal") protocols for the management of patients with HS at a meeting of the medical commission (signed by the head physician) or at a meeting of departments accredited to teach the specialties of "neurosurgery" and/or "neurology" (signed by the head of the department).
An "internal" protocol for managing patients with HS within a specific inpatient facility may introduce additions but must not contradict the main provisions of these clinical guidelines.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
No. | Quality assessment criteria | Evaluation of compliance |
1. | Computed tomography of the brain or magnetic resonance imaging of the brain was performed no later than 40 minutes from the moment of hospital admission. | Yes/No |
2. | An admission (examination, consultation) by a neurosurgeon was performed no later than 60 minutes from the moment of receiving the results of computed tomography for a patient in whom computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging established signs of hemorrhagic stroke. | Yes/No |
3. | The swallowing function was assessed using a swallowing test (the "three-swallow test" using a pulse oximeter) within the first 3 hours of the patient's stay in the inpatient facility. | Yes/No |
4. | Surgical treatment was performed to remove an intracerebral hematoma. | Yes/No |
5. | Surgical treatment was performed for a ruptured aneurysm in the acute period of hemorrhage. | Yes/No |
6. | Brain computed tomography was performed within 24 hours after surgical treatment. | Yes/No |
7. | Medical physical therapy for central nervous system and brain diseases, and/or medical physical therapy using apparatus and exercise equipment for central nervous system and brain diseases, and/or postural correction, and/or occupational therapy, and/or medical-speech therapy assessment for dysphagia, and/or a medical-speech therapy procedure for aphasia, and/or a medical-speech therapy procedure for dysarthria were performed no later than 48 hours from the moment of admission to the inpatient facility. | Yes/No |
8. | Computed tomography angiography, or magnetic resonance angiography, or cerebral angiography was performed to identify the source of hemorrhage in case of suspected aneurysm or arteriovenous malformation rupture according to brain computed tomography and/or brain magnetic resonance imaging, as well as in patients younger than 45 years and in the absence of a history of hypertension. | Yes/No |
References
Show references
Krylov V.V., Dashyan V.G., Vinokurov A.G. et al. Mikrokhirurgiya avanevrizm sosudov golovnogo mozga [Microsurgery of cerebral vascular aneurysms]. Moscow: ABV-press, 2022.
Morales-Valero S.F. et al. Are parenchymal AVMs congenital lesions? // Neurosurg. Focus. 2014. Vol. 37, № 3. P. E2.
Aboian M.S. et al. The putative role of the venous system in the genesis of vascular malformations // Neurosurg. Focus. 2009. Vol. 27, № 5. P. E9.
Godkov I.M. et al. Comparative analysis of the results of endoscopic surgery and external ventricular drainage in patients with intraventricular hemorrhage // Russ. J. Neurosurg. 2022. Vol. 24, № 2. P. 25–34.
Greenberg S.M. et al. 2022 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association // Stroke. 2022. Vol. 53, № 7.
Krylov V.V., Gekht A.B., Grigoriev A.Yu. et al. Neyrokhirurgiya i neyroreanimatologiya [Neurosurgery and neuro-resuscitation] / ed. by Academician of the RAS, Professor V. V. Krylov. Moscow: ABV-press, 2018. Vol. 783.
Krylov V.V. et al. Khirurgiya tyazheloy cherepno-mozgovoy travmy [Surgery of severe traumatic brain injury]. Moscow: ABV-press, 2022. Vol. 282.
Krylov V.V. et al. Khirurgiya gemorragicheskogo insul'ta [Surgery of hemorrhagic stroke]. Moscow: Meditsina, 2012. Vol. 336.
Warlow C.P. Stroke: A Practical Guide to Management. Transl. from English / ed. Skoromets A.A. S.V.A. Saint Petersburg: Politekhnika, 1998. Vol. 629.
Teasdale G., Jennett B. ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS // Lancet. 1974. Vol. 304, № 7872. P. 81–84.
Fisher C.M., Kistler J.P., Davis J.M. Relation of Cerebral Vasospasm to Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Visualized by Computerized Tomographic Scanning // Neurosurgery. 1980. Vol. 6, № 1. P. 1–9.
Frontera J.A. et al. PREDICTION OF SYMPTOMATIC VASOSPASMAFTER SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE // Neurosurgery. 2006. Vol. 59, № 1. P. 21–27.
Graeb D.A. et al. Computed tomographic diagnosis of intraventricular hemorrhage. Etiology and prognosis. // Radiology. 1982. Vol. 143, № 1. P. 91–96.
Eliava S.S. et al. The principles for choosing a surgical technique for patients with acute cerebral aneurysm rupture // Vopr. neirokhirurgii Im. N.N. Burdenko. 2016. Vol. 80, № 5. P. 15.
Pilipenko Y. V. et al. Reasonability and efficacy of decompressive craniectomy in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage after microsurgical aneurysm exclusion // Vopr. neirokhirurgii Im. N.N. Burdenko. 2018. Vol. 82, № 1. P. 59.
Connolly E.S. et al. Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2012. Vol. 43, № 6. P. 1711–1737.
Diringer M.N. et al. Critical Care Management of Patients Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Recommendations from the Neurocritical Care Society’s Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference // Neurocrit. Care. 2011. Vol. 15, № 2. P. 211.
Hunt W.E., Hess R.M. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms // J. Neurosurg. 1968. Vol. 28. P. 14–20.
Fernandez-L A. et al. Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia, a Vascular Dysplasia Affecting the TGF- Signaling Pathway // Clin. Med. Res. 2006. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 66–78.
Macmurdo C.F. et al. RASA1 somatic mutation and variable expressivity in capillary malformation/arteriovenous malformation (CM/AVM) syndrome // Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A. 2016. Vol. 170, № 6. P. 1450–1454.
Nishida T. et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations associated with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: Gene–phenotype correlations // Am. J. Med. Genet. Part A. 2012. Vol. 158A, № 11. P. 2829–2834.
Saleh M. et al. Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in Patients With Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia: Clinical Presentation and Anatomical Distribution // Pediatr. Neurol. 2013. Vol. 49, № 6. P. 445–450.
Delgado Almandoz J.E., Romero J.M. Advanced CT Imaging in the Evaluation of Hemorrhagic Stroke // Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2011. Vol. 21, № 2. P. 197–213.
Skidmore C.T., Andrefsky J. Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and medical management // Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2002. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 281–288.
Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage English Edition // Neurol. Med. Chir. (Tokyo). 2012. Vol. 52, № 6. P. 355–429.
Kassell N.F. et al. The International Cooperative Studyon the Timing of Aneurysm Surgery // J. Neurosurg. 1990. Vol. 73, № 1. P. 18–36.
Hoh B.L. et al. 2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association // Stroke. 2023. Vol. 54, № 7.
Michelsen J.W. Natural History and Pathophysiology of Arteriovenous Malformations // Neurosurgery. 1979. Vol. 26, № Supplement 1. P. 307–313.
Al-Shahi R. Prevalence of adults with brain arteriovenous malformations: a community based study in Scotland using capture-recapture analysis // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2002. Vol. 73, № 5. P. 547–551.
Starke R.M. et al. Treatment guidelines for cerebral arteriovenous malformation microsurgery // Br. J. Neurosurg. 2009. Vol. 23, № 4. P. 376–386.
Aoun S.G., Bendok B.R., Batjer H.H. Acute Management of Ruptured Arteriovenous Malformations and Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas // Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2012. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 87–103.
Stapf C. et al. Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation // Neurology. 2006. Vol. 66, № 9. P. 1350–1355.
Stein K.-P. et al. Associated Aneurysms in Supratentorial Arteriovenous Malformations: Impact of Aneurysm Size on Haemorrhage // Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2015. Vol. 39, № 2. P. 122–129.
Redekop G. et al. Arterial aneurysms associated with cerebral arteriovenous malformations: classification, incidence, and risk of hemorrhage // J. Neurosurg. 1998. Vol. 89, № 4. P. 539–546.
Kim E.J. et al. THE RELATIONSHIP OF COEXISTING EXTRANIDAL ANEURYSMS TO INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGE IN PATIENTS HARBORING BRAIN ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS // Neurosurgery. 2004. Vol. 54, № 6. P. 1349–1358.
Platz J. et al. Frequency, risk of hemorrhage and treatment considerations for cerebral arteriovenous malformations with associated aneurysms // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 2014. Vol. 156, № 11. P. 2025–2034.
Hemphill J.C. et al. Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2015. Vol. 46, № 7. P. 2032–2060.
Hemphill J.C. et al. The ICH Score // Stroke. 2001. Vol. 32, № 4. P. 891–897.
Broderick J.P. et al. Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage. A powerful and easy-to-use predictor of 30-day mortality. // Stroke. 1993. Vol. 24, № 7. P. 987–993.
Clinical guidelines "Hemorrhagic Stroke", 2022 https://ruans.org/Text/Guidelines/hemorrhagic-stroke-2022.pdf [Electronic resource].
Pritz M.B. Cerebral Aneurysm Classification Based on Angioarchitecture // J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2011. Vol. 20, № 2. P. 162–167.
Rice-Canetto T.E. et al. A Review of the Current Literature on Cerebral Aneurysms // Cureus. 2025.
Merritt W.C. et al. Definitions of intracranial aneurysm size and morphology: A call for standardization. // Surg. Neurol. Int. 2021. Vol. 12. P. 506.
Spetzler R.F., Martin N.A. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations // J. Neurosurg. 1986. Vol. 65, № 4. P. 476–483.
Spetzler R.F., Ponce F.A. A 3-tier classification of cerebral arteriovenous malformations // J. Neurosurg. 2011. Vol. 114, № 3. P. 842–849.
Frisoli F.A. et al. Spetzler-Martin Grade III Arteriovenous Malformations: A Comparison of Modified and Supplemented Spetzler-Martin Grading Systems // Neurosurgery. 2021. Vol. 88, № 6. P. 1103–1110.
Lawton M.T. et al. A Supplementary Grading Scale for Selecting Patients With Brain Arteriovenous Malformations for Surgery // Neurosurgery. 2010. Vol. 66, № 4. P. 702–713.
Kim H. et al. Validation of the Supplemented Spetzler-Martin Grading System for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations in a Multicenter Cohort of 1009 Surgical Patients // Neurosurgery. 2015. Vol. 76, № 1. P. 25–33.
Pollock B.E., Flickinger J.C. A proposed radiosurgery-based grading system for arteriovenous malformations // J. Neurosurg. 2002. Vol. 96, № 1. P. 79–85.
Pollock B.E., Flickinger J.C. MODIFICATION OF THE RADIOSURGERY-BASED ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION GRADING SYSTEM // Neurosurgery. 2008. Vol. 63, № 2. P. 239–243.
Starke R.M. et al. A practical grading scale for predicting outcome after radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: analysis of 1012 treated patients // J. Neurosurg. 2013. Vol. 119, № 4. P. 981–987.
Recommendations for the Management of Intracranial Haemorrhage – Part I: Spontaneous Intracerebral Haemorrhage // Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2006. Vol. 22, № 4. P. 294–316.
Qureshi A.I., Mendelow A.D., Hanley D.F. Intracerebral haemorrhage // Lancet. 2009. Vol. 373, № 9675. P. 1632–1644.
Vespa P.M. et al. Acute seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage // Neurology. 2003. Vol. 60, № 9. P. 1441–1446.
Mayer S.A. et al. Recombinant Activated Factor VII for Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage // N. Engl. J. Med. 2005. Vol. 352, № 8. P. 777–785.
Gemorragicheskiy insul't. Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo [Hemorrhagic stroke. A practical guide] / ed. by Skvortsova V.I. K.V.V. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2005. Vol. 160.
Diringer M.N. Management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage // Crit. Care Med. 2009. Vol. 37, № 2. P. 432–440.
Krylov V.V., Dmitriev A.Yu. [Clinic and diagnosis of arteriovenous malformations in the acute period of hemorrhage]. Nevrologicheskiy zhurnal. 2008. Vol. 13, № 4. P. 26–30.
Graf C.J., Perret G.E., Torner J.C. Bleeding from cerebral arteriovenous malformations as part of their natural history // J. Neurosurg. 1983. Vol. 58, № 3. P. 331–337.
Krylov V.V., Lebedev V.V. Neotlozhnaya neyrokhirurgiya: Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey [Emergency neurosurgery: A guide for physicians]. Moscow: Meditsina, 2000. Vol. 568. 506–530 p.
Smith E.E. et al. A risk score for in-hospital death in patients admitted with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. // J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2013. Vol. 2, № 1. P. e005207.
Goldstein L.B. Is This Patient Having a Stroke? // JAMA. 2005. Vol. 293, № 19. P. 2391.
Starke R.M. et al. Evaluation of a revised Glasgow Coma Score scale in predicting long-term outcome of poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients // J. Clin. Neurosci. 2009. Vol. 16, № 7. P. 894–899.
Cote R. et al. The Canadian Neurological Scale: Validation and reliability assessment // Neurology. 1989. Vol. 39. P. 638–643.
Allen C.M. Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: a prognostic score. // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1984. Vol. 47, № 5. P. 475–480.
Bruce S.S. et al. A Comparative Evaluation of Existing Grading Scales in Intracerebral Hemorrhage // Neurocrit. Care. 2011. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 498–505.
Hage V. The NIH stroke scale: a window into neurological status // Nurs. Spectr. 2011. Vol. 24, № 15. P. 44–49.
Sherman V., Greco E., Martino R. The Benefit of Dysphagia Screening in Adult Patients With Stroke: A Meta-Analysis. // J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2021. Vol. 10, № 12. P. e018753.
Martino R. et al. Dysphagia After Stroke // Stroke. 2005. Vol. 36, № 12. P. 2756–2763.
Feng M.-C. et al. The Mortality and the Risk of Aspiration Pneumonia Related with Dysphagia in Stroke Patients // J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2019. Vol. 28, № 5. P. 1381–1387.
Mayda-Domaç F., Mısırlı H., Yılmaz M. Prognostic Role of Mean Platelet Volume and Platelet Count in Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke // J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2010. Vol. 19, № 1. P. 66–72.
Du J. et al. Association of mean platelet volume and platelet count with the development and prognosis of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke // Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2016. Vol. 38, № 3. P. 233–239.
Morbitzer K.A. et al. Enhanced Renal Clearance in Patients With Hemorrhagic Stroke* // Crit. Care Med. 2019. Vol. 47, № 6. P. 800–808.
Iribarren C. et al. Low Total Serum Cholesterol and Intracerebral Hemorrhagic Stroke: Is the Association Confined to Elderly Men? // Stroke. 1996. Vol. 27, № 11. P. 1993–1998.
Wang Y. et al. Retrospective Analysis of the Predictive Effect of Coagulogram on the Prognosis of Intracerebral Hemorrhage. 2011. P. 383–385.
Tsementzis S.A. et al. Reduced platelet function in subarachnoid hemorrhage // J. Neurosurg. 1986. Vol. 64, № 6. P. 907–910.
Ziai W.C. et al. Platelet count and function in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage // J. Stroke Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2003. Vol. 12, № 4. P. 201–206.
Kidwell C.S. Comparison of MRI and CT for Detection of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage // JAMA. 2004. Vol. 292, № 15. P. 1823.
Fiebach J.B. et al. Stroke Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Accurate in Hyperacute Intracerebral Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2004. Vol. 35, № 2. P. 502–506.
Chalela J.A. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison // Lancet. 2007. Vol. 369, № 9558. P. 293–298.
Divani A.A. et al. The ABCs of Accurate Volumetric Measurement of Cerebral Hematoma // Stroke. 2011. Vol. 42, № 6. P. 1569–1574.
Montes J.M. et al. Stereotactic Computed Tomographic–Guided Aspiration and Thrombolysis of Intracerebral Hematoma // Stroke. 2000. Vol. 31, № 4. P. 834–840.
Cho D.-Y. et al. Endoscopic surgery for spontaneous basal ganglia hemorrhage: comparing endoscopic surgery, stereotactic aspiration, and craniotomy in noncomatose patients // Surg. Neurol. 2006. Vol. 65, № 6. P. 547–555.
Lee J.J. et al. Subdural hematoma as a major determinant of short-term outcomes in traumatic brain injury // J. Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 128, № 1. P. 236–249.
Buruma O.J. et al. Blood-stained cerebrospinal fluid: traumatic puncture or haemorrhage? // J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1981. Vol. 44, № 2. P. 144–147.
Westerlaan H.E. et al. Intracranial Aneurysms in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: CT Angiography as a Primary Examination Tool for Diagnosis—Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Radiology. 2011. Vol. 258, № 1. P. 134–145.
Sailer A.M.H. et al. Diagnosing Intracranial Aneurysms With MR Angiography // Stroke. 2014. Vol. 45, № 1. P. 119–126.
Delgado Almandoz J.E. et al. Independent Validation of the Secondary Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score With Catheter Angiography and Findings of Emergent Hematoma Evacuation // Neurosurgery. 2012. Vol. 70, № 1. P. 131–140.
Yeung R. et al. Comparison of CTA to DSA in Determining the Etiology of Spontaneous ICH // Can. J. Neurol. Sci. / J. Can. des Sci. Neurol. 2009. Vol. 36, № 2. P. 176–180.
Donauer E. et al. Intraventricular haemorrhage caused by aneurysms and angiomas // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 1993. Vol. 122, № 1–2. P. 23–31.
Delgado Almandoz J.E. et al. Systematic Characterization of the Computed Tomography Angiography Spot Sign in Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage Identifies Patients at Highest Risk for Hematoma Expansion // Stroke. 2009. Vol. 40, № 9. P. 2994–3000.
Zhu X.L., Chan M.S.Y., Poon W.S. Spontaneous Intracranial Hemorrhage: Which Patients Need Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography? // Stroke. 1997. Vol. 28, № 7. P. 1406–1409.
Delgado Almandoz J.E. et al. Practical Scoring System for the Identification of Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage at Highest Risk of Harboring an Underlying Vascular Etiology: The Secondary Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2010. Vol. 31, № 9. P. 1653–1660.
Perrini P. et al. Results of surgical and endovascular treatment of intracranial micro-arteriovenous malformations with emphasis on superselective angiography // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 2004. Vol. 146, № 8.
Derdeyn C.P. et al. Management of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association // Stroke. 2017. Vol. 48, № 8.
da Costa L. et al. The Natural History and Predictive Features of Hemorrhage From Brain Arteriovenous Malformations // Stroke. 2009. Vol. 40, № 1. P. 100–105.
Alexander M.D. et al. Association between Venous Angioarchitectural Features of Sporadic Brain Arteriovenous Malformations and Intracranial Hemorrhage // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2015. Vol. 36, № 5. P. 949–952.
Sahlein D.H. et al. Features Predictive of Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2014. Vol. 45, № 7. P. 1964–1970.
Suarez J.I. et al. Symptomatic vasospasm diagnosis after subarachnoid hemorrhage: Evaluation of transcranial Doppler ultrasound and cerebral angiography as related to compromised vascular distribution // Crit. Care Med. 2002. Vol. 30, № 6. P. 1348–1355.
Viski S., Olah L. Use of Transcranial Doppler in Intensive Care Unit // J. Crit. Care Med. 2017. Vol. 3, № 3. P. 99–104.
Shakhnovich A.R. Diagnostika narusheniy mozgovogo krovoobrashcheniya. Transkranial'naya dopplerografiya [Diagnosis of cerebrovascular disorders. Transcranial Doppler sonography] / ed. Shakhnovich A.R. Sh.V.A. 1996. Vol. 446.
Mitchelle A. et al. CTP for the Screening of Vasospasm and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Aneurysmal SAH: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2024. Vol. 45, № 7. P. 871–878.
Cremers C.H.P. et al. Different CT perfusion algorithms in the detection of delayed cerebral ischemia after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage // Neuroradiology. 2015. Vol. 57, № 5. P. 469–474.
Malinova V. et al. Defining cutoff values for early prediction of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage by CT perfusion // Neurosurg. Rev. 2020. Vol. 43, № 2. P. 581–587.
Lukyanchikov V.A. [Bypass surgery in the treatment of cerebral ischemia caused by vasospasm after aneurysm rupture]. Neyrokhirurgiya. 2015. Vol. 1. P. 90–96.
Krylov V.V. et al. [Comparative analysis of computed tomography and intracranial Doppler sonography data in patients with cerebral vasospasm]. Nevrologicheskiy zhurnal. 2016. Vol. 21, № 6. P. 344–352.
Mir D.I.A. et al. CT Perfusion for Detection of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2014. Vol. 35, № 5. P. 866–871.
Busse T.L. et al. Perfusion Computed Tomography as a Screening Tool for Pending Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Comatose Patients After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Cohort Study // Neurocrit. Care. 2024. Vol. 40, № 3. P. 964–975.
KT-angiorafiya avanevrizm golovnogo mozga [CT angiography of cerebral aneurysms] / ed. by Krylov V.V. Moscow: OOO "Print-Studio", 2019. Vol. 332.
Qureshi A.I. Effect of Systolic Blood Pressure Reduction on Hematoma Expansion, Perihematomal Edema, and 3-Month Outcome Among Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage // Arch. Neurol. 2010. Vol. 67, № 5. P. 570.
Anderson C.S. et al. Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial (INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial // Lancet Neurol. 2008. Vol. 7, № 5. P. 391–399.
Anderson C.S. et al. Rapid Blood-Pressure Lowering in Patients with Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage // N. Engl. J. Med. 2013. Vol. 368, № 25. P. 2355–2365.
Ma L. et al. The third Intensive Care Bundle with Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage Trial (INTERACT3): an international, stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial // Lancet. 2023. Vol. 402, № 10395. P. 27–40.
Moullaali T.J. et al. Blood pressure control and clinical outcomes in acute intracerebral haemorrhage: a preplanned pooled analysis of individual participant data // Lancet Neurol. 2019. Vol. 18, № 9. P. 857–864.
Steiner T. et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and European Association of Neurosurgical Societies (EANS) guideline on stroke due to spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage // Eur. Stroke J. 2025.
Frontera J.A. et al. Guideline for Reversal of Antithrombotics in Intracranial Hemorrhage // Neurocrit. Care. 2016. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 6–46.
Baranich A.I. et al. Correction of the effect of vitamin K antagonists and antiplatelet agents in hemorrhagic stroke // Burdenko’s J. Neurosurg. 2024. Vol. 88, № 6. P. 103.
Zabolotskikh I.B. et al. [Hypovolemic shock in adults. Clinical guidelines of the all-Russian public organization "Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists"]. Ann. Crit. Care. 2024. № 4. P. 7–39.
Baranich A.I. et al. Correction of the effect of direct oral and parenteral anticoagulants in hemorrhagic stroke // Burdenko’s J. Neurosurg. 2025. Vol. 89, № 1. P. 109.
Berger K. et al. A Low-Dose 4F-PCC Protocol for DOAC-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage // J. Intensive Care Med. 2020. Vol. 35, № 11. P. 1203–1208.
Guo Y. et al. Tranexamic Acid for Acute Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials // Front. Neurol. 2021. Vol. 12.
Wong G., Mak, Lu Yeow Yuen G. Review and recommendations on management of refractory raised intracranial pressure in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage // Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2013. P. 353.
Oshorov A.V., Savin I.A., Goryachev A.S. Vnutricherepnaya gipertenziya. Patofiziologiya. Monitoring. Lechenie [Intracranial hypertension. Pathophysiology. Monitoring. Treatment]. Moscow: IP Volkov A.A., 2021. Vol. 657.
Wang X. et al. Mannitol and Outcome in Intracerebral Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2015. Vol. 46, № 10. P. 2762–2767.
Lee K. The NeuroICU Book, Second Edition. McGraw-Hill Education, 2017. Vol. 1008.
Fink M.E. Osmotherapy for Intracranial Hypertension // Continuum (N. Y). 2012. Vol. 18, № 3. P. 640–654.
Poungvarin N. et al. Effects of Dexamethasone in Primary Supratentorial Intracerebral Hemorrhage // N. Engl. J. Med. 1987. Vol. 316, № 20. P. 1229–1233.
Nyquist P. et al. Prophylaxis of Venous Thrombosis in Neurocritical Care Patients: An Evidence-Based Guideline: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society // Neurocrit. Care. 2016. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 47–60.
Dennis M. et al. The Effect of Graduated Compression Stockings on Long-term Outcomes After Stroke // Stroke. 2013. Vol. 44, № 4. P. 1075–1079.
Lacut K. et al. Prevention of venous thrombosis in patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage // Neurology. 2005. Vol. 65, № 6. P. 865–869.
Dennis M. et al. The Clots in Legs Or sTockings after Stroke (CLOTS) 3 trial: a randomised controlled trial to determine whether or not intermittent pneumatic compression reduces the risk of post-stroke deep vein thrombosis and to estimate its cost-effectiveness // Health Technol. Assess. (Rockv). 2015. Vol. 19, № 76. P. 1–90.
Li H. et al. Low-molecular-weight heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism among patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage: A meta-analysis // PLoS One. 2024. Vol. 19, № 10. P. e0311858.
PACIARONI M. et al. Efficacy and safety of anticoagulants in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute cerebral hemorrhage: a meta‐analysis of controlled studies // J. Thromb. Haemost. 2011. Vol. 9, № 5. P. 893–898.
Al-Shahi Salman R. et al. Effects of antiplatelet therapy after stroke due to intracerebral haemorrhage (RESTART): a randomised, open-label trial // Lancet. 2019. Vol. 393, № 10191. P. 2613–2623.
Alharthi S.Y. et al. Antiplatelet Resumption After Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Diagnostics. 2025. Vol. 15, № 14. P. 1780.
Dorhout Mees S. et al. Calcium antagonists for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2007.
Yung D. et al. Reinitiation of Anticoagulation After Warfarin-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage and Mortality Risk: The Best Practice for Reinitiating Anticoagulation Therapy After Intracranial Bleeding (BRAIN) Study // Can. J. Cardiol. 2012. Vol. 28, № 1. P. 33–39.
Phan T.G., Koh M., Wijdicks E.F.M. Safety of Discontinuation of Anticoagulation in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage at High Thromboembolic Risk // Arch. Neurol. 2000. Vol. 57, № 12. P. 1710.
Majeed A. et al. Optimal Timing of Resumption of Warfarin After Intracranial Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2010. Vol. 41, № 12. P. 2860–2866.
Grainger B.T., McFadyen J.D., Tran H. Between a rock and a hard place: resumption of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial hemorrhage // J. Thromb. Haemost. 2024. Vol. 22, № 3. P. 594–603.
Lee H.S. et al. Clinical course of spontaneous gangliothalamic hemorrhage in the acute period: who requires surgical removal? // J. Korean Med. Sci. 1991. Vol. 6, № 2. P. 103.
Khosravani H. et al. Emergency Noninvasive Angiography for Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2013. Vol. 34, № 8. P. 1481–1487.
Kuo L.-T. et al. Early endoscope-assisted hematoma evacuation in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage: case selection, surgical technique, and long-term results // Neurosurg. Focus. 2011. Vol. 30, № 4. P. E9.
Wang Z. et al. [Endoscopic surgery for hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage]. // Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao. Yi Xue Ban. 2005. Vol. 30, № 4. P. 424–426.
Zhu H., Shi W., Wang Z. Keyhole endoscopic hematoma evacuation in patients // Turk. Neurosurg. 2011.
Auer L.M. et al. Endoscopic surgery versus medical treatment for spontaneous intracerebral hematoma: a randomized study // J. Neurosurg. 1989. Vol. 70, № 4. P. 530–535.
Krylov V.V., Dashyan V.G., Godkov I.M. Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya gemorragicheskogo insul'ta [Endoscopic surgery of hemorrhagic stroke]. Moscow: Binom, 2014. Vol. 96.
Dashyan V.G. et al. Open and minimally invasive surgery for hypertensive intracranial hemorrhages. Surgey outcomes of 500 patients // Russ. J. Neurosurg. 2022. Vol. 23, № 4. P. 33–43.
Godkov I.M., Dashyan V.G. Comparing the results of surgical and conservative treatment of patients with supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. A new look at previously known randomized studies // Ann. Clin. Exp. Neurol. 2021. Vol. 15, № 1.
Dashyan V.G. et al. Endoscopic surgery for hemorrhagic stroke in regional vascular centers // Russ. J. Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 35–44.
Dash’ian V.G. et al. [Endoscopic surgery of hemorrhagic stroke]. // Zhurnal Nevrol. i psikhiatrii Im. S.S. Korsakova. 2014. Vol. 114, № 3 Pt 2. P. 7–13.
Morgenstern L.B. et al. Guidelines for the Management of Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2010. Vol. 41, № 9. P. 2108–2129.
van Loon J. et al. Controversies in the management of spontaneous cerebellar haemorrhage a consecutive series of 49 cases and review of the literature // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 1993. Vol. 122, № 3–4. P. 187–193.
Li L. et al. Surgical Evacuation of Spontaneous Cerebellar Hemorrhage: Comparison of Safety and Efficacy of Suboccipital Craniotomy, Stereotactic Aspiration, and Thrombolysis and Endoscopic Surgery // World Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 117. P. e90–e98.
Xu X. et al. Minimally invasive surgeries for spontaneous hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (MISICH): a multicenter randomized controlled trial // BMC Med. 2024. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 244.
Skvortsova V.I. et al. Reduction in stroke death rates through a package of measures to improve medical care for patients with vascular diseases in the Russian Federation // Profil. meditsina. 2018. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 4.
Wang W.-Z. et al. Minimally Invasive Craniopuncture Therapy vs. Conservative Treatment for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Results from a Randomized Clinical Trial in China // Int. J. Stroke. 2009. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 11–16.
Dye J.A. et al. Frontal bur hole through an eyebrow incision for image-guided endoscopic evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage // J. Neurosurg. 2012. Vol. 117, № 4. P. 767–773.
Mendelow A.D. The international surgical trial in intracerebral haemorrhage (ISTICH) // Brain Edema XII. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2003. P. 441–443.
Pilipenko Yu.V. et al. [Local fibrinolysis of non-traumatic intracerebral and intraventricular hemorrhages]. Zhurnal voprosy neyrokhirurgii im. akademika N. N. Burdenko. 2012. Vol. 76, № 6. P. 3–13.
Krylov V. V. et al. LOCAL FIBRINOLYSIS IN SURGICAL TREATMENT OF NON-TRAUMATIC INTRACRANIAL HEMORRHAGES // Ann. Russ. Acad. Med. Sci. 2013. Vol. 68, № 7. P. 24–31.
Hattori N. et al. Impact of stereotactic hematoma evacuation on activities of daily living during the chronic period following spontaneous putaminal hemorrhage: a randomized study // J. Neurosurg. 2004. Vol. 101, № 3. P. 417–420.
Kaneko M. et al. Long-term evaluation of ultra-early operation for hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in 100 cases // J. Neurosurg. 1983. Vol. 58, № 6. P. 838–842.
Rabinstein A.A., Atkinson J.L., Wijdicks E.F.M. Emergency craniotomy in patients worsening due to expanded cerebral hematoma // Neurology. 2002. Vol. 58, № 9. P. 1367–1372.
Wakai S., Kumakura N., Nagai M. Lobar intracerebral hemorrhage // J. Neurosurg. 1992. Vol. 76, № 2. P. 231–238.
Mendelow A.D. et al. Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II): a randomised trial // Lancet. 2013. Vol. 382, № 9890. P. 397–408.
Krylov V.V. et al. Punktsionnaya aspiratsiya i lokal'nyy fibrinolysis v khirurgii vnutricherepnykh krovoizliyaniy [Puncture aspiration and local fibrinolysis in the surgery of intracranial hemorrhages]. Moscow: Avtorskaya akademiya. Tovarishchestvo nauchnykh izdaniy KMK, 2009. Vol. 160.
Gaberel T. et al. Intraventricular Fibrinolysis Versus External Ventricular Drainage Alone in Intraventricular Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2011. Vol. 42, № 10. P. 2776–2781.
Kondziolka D., McLaughlin M.R., Kestle J.R.W. Simple Risk Predictions for Arteriovenous Malformation Hemorrhage // Neurosurgery. 1995. Vol. 37, № 5. P. 851–855.
Nasser J.A. et al. Stereotactic fibrinolysis of spontaneous intracerebral hematoma using infusion of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator // Arq. Neuropsiquiatr. 2002. Vol. 60, № 2B. P. 362–366.
Teernstra O.P.M. et al. Stereotactic Treatment of Intracerebral Hematoma by Means of a Plasminogen Activator // Stroke. 2003. Vol. 34, № 4. P. 968–974.
Saribekyan A.S. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie gemorragicheskogo insul'ta metodom punktsionnoy aspiratsii i lokal'nogo fibrinolysis [Surgical treatment of hemorrhagic stroke by puncture aspiration and local fibrinolysis]. Moscow: Letopis', 2009. Vol. 288.
Dashyan V.G. et al. Decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of supratentorial hypertensive intracerebral hematomas // Russ. J. Neurosurg. 2021. Vol. 23, № 2. P. 66–76.
Konovalov A.N., Krylov V.V., Filatov Yu.M. et al. [Recommender protocol for the management of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured cerebral aneurysms]. Zhurnal «Voprosy neyrokhirurgii» imeni N.N. Burdenko. 2006. № 3. P. 3–11.
Steiner T. et al. European Stroke Organization Guidelines for the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms and Subarachnoid Haemorrhage // Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2013. Vol. 35, № 2. P. 93–112.
Cobler-Lichter M.J. et al. Safety and Outcomes of Valproic Acid in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Study // Clin. Neuropharmacol. 2025. Vol. 48, № 2. P. 43–50.
Yerram S. et al. Seizure prophylaxis in the neuroscience intensive care unit // J. Intensive Care. 2018. Vol. 6, № 1. P. 17.
Zafar S.F. et al. Antiseizure Medication Treatment and Outcomes in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Undergoing Continuous EEG Monitoring // Neurocrit. Care. 2022. Vol. 36, № 3. P. 857–867.
Lehecka M., Laakso A., Hernesniemi J. Helsinki Microneurosurgery. Basics and Tricks. 2011. Vol. 343.
Goryachev A.S., Savin I.A. Osnovy IVL [Basics of mechanical ventilation]. Moscow: Aksiom Grafiks Yunion, 2017. Vol. 258.
Calviere L. et al. Rebleeding After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Two Centers Using Different Blood Pressure Management Strategies. // Front. Neurol. 2022. Vol. 13. P. 836268.
Roquilly A. et al. Balanced versus chloride-rich solutions for fluid resuscitation in brain-injured patients: a randomised double-blind pilot study // Crit. Care. 2013. Vol. 17, № 2. P. R77.
Bercker S. et al. Hydroxyethyl starch for volume expansion after subarachnoid haemorrhage and renal function: Results of a retrospective analysis // PLoS One. 2018. Vol. 13, № 2. P. e0192832.
Allen G.S. et al. Cerebral Arterial Spasm – A Controlled Trial of Nimodipine in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // N. Engl. J. Med. 1983. Vol. 308, № 11. P. 619–624.
Choudhari K.A. et al. Aneurysms unsuitable for endovascular intervention: Surgical outcome and management challenges over a 5-year period following International Subarachnoid Haemorrhage Trial (ISAT) // Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2007. Vol. 109, № 10. P. 868–875.
Molyneux A.J. et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion // Lancet. 2005. Vol. 366, № 9488. P. 809–817.
Krylov V.V. et al. [Choice of timing for open surgical treatment of patients with ruptured cerebral aneurysms complicated by massive basal subarachnoid hemorrhage (Fisher 3)]. Neyrokhirurgiya. 2015. № 3. P. 11–17.
Eliava Sh.Sh. et al. Khirurgicheskoe lechenie avanevrizm golovnogo mozga v ostrom periode krovoizliyaniya [Surgical treatment of cerebral aneurysms in the acute period of hemorrhage] / ed. by Sh. Sh. Eliava. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo IP T. A. Alekseeva, 2019. Vol. 232.
Oshiro E.M. et al. A New Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading System Based on the Glasgow Coma Scale: A Comparison with the Hunt and Hess and World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Scales in a Clinical Series // Neurosurgery. 1997. Vol. 41, № 1. P. 140–148.
Tommasino N. et al. Epidemiologic and Evolutionary Profile of Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage With Glasgow Coma Scale Score of 8 or Less Who Entered the Follow-Up Program of the National Institute of Donation and Transplantation // Transplant. Proc. 2018. Vol. 50, № 2. P. 405–407.
Bailes J.E. et al. Management morbidity and mortality of poor-grade aneurysm patients // J. Neurosurg. 1990. Vol. 72, № 4. P. 559–566.
Molyneux A. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial // Lancet. 2002. Vol. 360, № 9342. P. 1267–1274.
Wach J. et al. A Long-Term Comparative Analysis of Endovascular Coiling and Clipping for Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysms: An Individual Patient-Level Meta-Analysis Assessing Rerupture Rates // J. Clin. Med. 2024. Vol. 13, № 6. P. 1778.
Pierot L. et al. Rebleeding and bleeding in the year following intracranial aneurysm coiling: analysis of a large prospective multicenter cohort of 1140 patients—Analysis of Recanalization after Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysm (ARETA) Study // J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2020. Vol. 12, № 12. P. 1219–1225.
Spetzler R.F. et al. Ten-year analysis of saccular aneurysms in the Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial // J. Neurosurg. 2020. Vol. 132, № 3. P. 771–776.
Lindgren A. et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for people with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018. Vol. 2018, № 8.
Heiskanen O. et al. Acute surgery for intracerebral haematomas caused by rupture of an intracranial arterial aneurysm // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 1988. Vol. 90, № 3–4. P. 81–83.
Güresir E. et al. SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE AND INTRACEREBRAL HEMATOMA // Neurosurgery. 2008. Vol. 63, № 6. P. 1088–1094.
Ryttlefors M. et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial of Neurosurgical Clipping Versus Endovascular Coiling // Stroke. 2008. Vol. 39, № 10. P. 2720–2726.
Mitchell P. et al. Could late rebleeding overturn the superiority of cranial aneurysm coil embolization over clip ligation seen in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial? // J. Neurosurg. 2008. Vol. 108, № 3. P. 437–442.
Eliava S.S. et al. Microsurgical treatment of 723 cerebral aneurysms: a single-center prospective study // Burdenko’s J. Neurosurg. 2025. Vol. 89, № 3. P. 60.
Spetzler R.F. et al. The Barrow Ruptured Aneurysm Trial: 6-year results // J. Neurosurg. 2015. Vol. 123, № 3. P. 609–617.
Colby G.P., Coon A.L., Tamargo R.J. Surgical Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2010. Vol. 21, № 2. P. 247–261.
Biebuyck J.F., Young W.L., Pile-Spellman J. Anesthetic Considerations for Interventional Neuroradiology // Anesthesiology. 1994. Vol. 80, № 2. P. 427–456.
Manninen P.H., Chan A.S., Papworth D. Conscious sedation for interventional neuroradiology: a comparison of midazolam and propofol infusion // Can. J. Anaesth. 1997. Vol. 44, № 1. P. 26–30.
Komotar R.J. et al. Efficacy of lamina terminalis fenestration in reducing shunt-dependent hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review // J. Neurosurg. 2009. Vol. 111, № 1. P. 147–154.
Eliava Sh.Sh., Shekhtman O.D., Pilipenko Yu.V. et al. [Intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in cerebral aneurysm surgery. First experience and literature review]. Zhurnal «Voprosy neyrokhirurgii» imeni N.N. Burdenko. 2015. Vol. 1. P. 33–41.
Etminan N. et al. European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines on management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms // Eur. Stroke J. 2022. Vol. 7, № 3.
Azhari S. et al. The Diagnostic Value of CT Angiography in the Diagnosis of Residual Aneurysm After Brain Aneurysm Surgery // Iran. J. Radiol. 2018. Vol. 15, № 1.
Selles M. et al. Advances in metal artifact reduction in CT images: A review of traditional and novel metal artifact reduction techniques // Eur. J. Radiol. 2024. Vol. 170. P. 111276.
Krylov V. V. et al. Prevention of cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with massive aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage // Russ. J. Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 12–26.
Lu X. et al. Intrathecal Fibrinolysis for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies // Front. Neurol. 2019. Vol. 10.
Jang K.M. et al. The Effect of Locally Administered Fibrinolytic Drugs Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage : A Meta-Analysis with Eight Randomized Controlled Studies. // J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2021. Vol. 64, № 2. P. 207–216.
Bader E.R. et al. Thrombolysis for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2025. Vol. 2025, № 1.
Wiebers D.O. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment // Lancet. 2003. Vol. 362, № 9378. P. 103–110.
Shalygin K.V. et al. [Ultrarearly X-ray endovascular embolization of cerebral aneurysms in subarachnoid hemorrhage]. Endovaskulyarnaya khirurgiya. 2019. Vol. 6, № 4. P. 312–320.
Rizvi A. et al. Long-Term Rupture Risk in Patients with Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Endovascular Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2020. Vol. 41, № 6. P. 1043–1048.
Salimi Ashkezari S.F. et al. Blebs in intracranial aneurysms: prevalence and general characteristics // J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2021. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 226–230.
Funakoshi Y. et al. Predictors of Cerebral Aneurysm Rupture after Coil Embolization: Single-Center Experience with Recanalized Aneurysms // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2020. Vol. 41, № 5. P. 828–835.
Greve T. et al. Initial Raymond–Roy Occlusion Classification but not Packing Density Defines Risk for Recurrence after Aneurysm Coiling // Clin. Neuroradiol. 2021. Vol. 31, № 2. P. 391–399.
Raymond J. et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. // Stroke. 2003. Vol. 34, № 6. P. 1398–1403.
Eliava S.S. et al. Unruptured asymptomatic brain aneurysms: modern approaches to the choice of surgical method and treatment outcomes // Vopr. neirokhirurgii Im. N.N. Burdenko. 2021. Vol. 85, № 6. P. 6.
Shapiro M. et al. Stent-Supported Aneurysm Coiling: A Literature Survey of Treatment and Follow-Up // Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012. Vol. 33, № 1. P. 159–163.
Kandyba D. et al. [The role of assisting methods in endovascular occlusion of cerebral aneurysms]. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya. 2012. Vol. 16, № 3. P. 27–33.
Arthur A.S. et al. The safety and effectiveness of the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) system for the treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms: final 12-month results of the pivotal WEB Intrasaccular Therapy (WEB-IT) Study // J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2019. Vol. 11, № 9. P. 924–930.
Berestov V. V. et al. Stent-assisted coiling of acute ruptured cerebral aneurysms. Sibirskiy nauchnyy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2021. Vol. 41, № 4. P. 40–47.
Ramakrishnan P. et al. Intra-Arterial Eptifibatide in the Management of Thromboembolism during Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: Case Series and a Review of the Literature // Interv. Neurol. 2013. Vol. 2, № 1. P. 19–29.
Cho Y.-H. et al. Imaging follow-up strategy after endovascular treatment of Intracranial aneurysms: A literature review and guideline recommendations // J. Cerebrovasc. Endovasc. Neurosurg. 2024. Vol. 26, № 1. P. 1–10.
Chung D.Y., Mayer S.A., Rordorf G.A. External Ventricular Drains After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Is Less More? // Neurocrit. Care. 2018. Vol. 28, № 2. P. 157–161.
Hasan D., Tanghe H.L.J. Distribution of cisternal blood in patients with acute hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage // Ann. Neurol. 1992. Vol. 31, № 4. P. 374–378.
Heros R.C. Acute hydrocephalus after subarachnoid hemorrhage. // Stroke. 1989. Vol. 20, № 6. P. 715–717.
Di Rienzo A. et al. Endoscope-assisted microsurgical evacuation versus external ventricular drainage for the treatment of cast intraventricular hemorrhage: results of a comparative series // Neurosurg. Rev. 2020. Vol. 43, № 2. P. 695–708.
Tunkel A.R. et al. 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America’s Clinical Practice Guidelines for Healthcare-Associated Ventriculitis and Meningitis* // Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017. Vol. 64, № 6. P. e34–e65.
Konovalov A. et al. External Ventricular Drainage in Patients With Acute Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage After Microsurgical Clipping: Our 2006-2018 Experience and a Literature Review // Cureus. 2021.
Chung D.Y. et al. Evidence-Based Management of External Ventricular Drains // Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 2019. Vol. 19, № 12. P. 94.
Fried H.I. et al. The Insertion and Management of External Ventricular Drains: An Evidence-Based Consensus Statement // Neurocrit. Care. 2016. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 61–81.
Widén J. et al. Diagnosis of external ventricular drainage related infections with real-time 16S PCR and third-generation 16S sequencing // Infect. Dis. (Auckl). 2024. Vol. 56, № 7. P. 521–530.
Gigante P. et al. External ventricular drainage following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage // Br. J. Neurosurg. 2010. Vol. 24, № 6. P. 625–632.
Karvouniaris M. et al. Current Perspectives on the Diagnosis and Management of Healthcare-Associated Ventriculitis and Meningitis // Infect. Drug Resist. 2022. Vol. Volume 15. P. 697–721.
Xie Z. et al. Predictors of Shunt-dependent Hydrocephalus After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // World Neurosurg. 2017. Vol. 106. P. 844-860.e6.
Brandecker S. et al. Primary decompressive craniectomy in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: long-term outcome in a single-center study and systematic review of literature // Neurosurg. Rev. 2021. Vol. 44, № 4. P. 2153–2162.
Dashyan V.G. et al. [Decompressive craniotomy in the surgery of ruptured cerebral aneurysms]. Rossiyskiy neyrokhirurgicheskiy zhurnal im. prof. A.L. Polenova. 2015. Vol. 7, № 4. P. 18–25.
Dorfer C. et al. Decompressive Hemicraniectomy After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // World Neurosurg. 2010. Vol. 74, № 4–5. P. 465–471.
Buschmann U. et al. Decompressive hemicraniectomy in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage and intractable intracranial hypertension // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 2007. Vol. 149, № 1. P. 59–65.
Alotaibi N.M. et al. Management of raised intracranial pressure in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: time for a consensus? // Neurosurg. Focus. 2017. Vol. 43, № 5. P. E13.
Liu C.-C. et al. Efficacy of propofol-based anesthesia against risk of brain swelling during craniotomy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies // J. Clin. Anesth. 2024. Vol. 92. P. 111306.
Zhou Z., Ying M., Zhao R. Efficacy and safety of sevoflurane vs propofol in combination with remifentanil for anesthesia maintenance during craniotomy // Medicine (Baltimore). 2021. Vol. 100, № 51. P. e28400.
Chui J. et al. Comparison of propofol and volatile agents for maintenance of anesthesia during elective craniotomy procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis // Can. J. Anesth. Can. d’anesthésie. 2014. Vol. 61, № 4. P. 347–356.
Bhardwaj A. et al. Comparison of propofol and desflurane for postanaesthetic morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for aneurysmal SAH: a randomized clinical trial // J. Anesth. 2018. Vol. 32, № 2. P. 250–258.
Yi J. et al. Maintaining intraoperative normothermia reduces blood loss in patients undergoing major operations: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial // BMC Anesthesiol. 2018. Vol. 18, № 1. P. 126.
Ingram A., Harper M. The health economic benefits of perioperative patient warming for prevention of blood loss and transfusion requirements as a consequence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia // J. Perioper. Pract. 2018. Vol. 28, № 9. P. 215–222.
Mestdagh F.P. et al. Pain management after elective craniotomy // Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2023. Vol. 40, № 10. P. 747–757.
Kulikov A. et al. Preoperative Versus Postoperative Scalp Block Combined With Incision Line Infiltration for Pain Control After Supratentorial Craniotomy // Clin. J. Pain. 2021. Vol. 37, № 3. P. 194–198.
Uribe A.A. et al. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Craniotomy: An Evidence-based Review of General Considerations, Risk Factors, and Management // J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol. 2021. Vol. 33, № 3. P. 212–220.
Kundra S. et al. Principles of neuroanesthesia in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage // J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 2014. Vol. 30, № 3. P. 328.
Hagerty T. et al. Risk Factors for Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Critically Ill Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // J. Neurosci. Nurs. 2015. Vol. 47, № 1. P. 51–54.
Menegaz de Almeida A. et al. Hypertonic Saline Solution Versus Mannitol for Brain Relaxation During Craniotomies: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-Analysis // Neurosurgery. 2024. Vol. 95, № 3. P. 517–526.
Robba C. et al. Clinical practice and effect of carbon dioxide on outcomes in mechanically ventilated acute brain-injured patients: a secondary analysis of the ENIO study // Intensive Care Med. 2024. Vol. 50, № 2. P. 234–246.
Ravishankar N. et al. Management Strategies for Intracranial Pressure Crises in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // J. Intensive Care Med. 2020. Vol. 35, № 3. P. 211–218.
Pasternak J.J. et al. Hyperglycemia in Patients Undergoing Cerebral Aneurysm Surgery: Its Association With Long-term Gross Neurologic and Neuropsychological Function // Mayo Clin. Proc. 2008. Vol. 83, № 4. P. 406–417.
Kruyt N.D. et al. Hyperglycemia and Clinical Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2009. Vol. 40, № 6.
Whiting P. et al. Viscoelastic point-of-care testing to assist with the diagnosis, management and monitoring of haemostasis: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis // Health Technol. Assess. (Rockv). 2015. Vol. 19, № 58. P. 1–228.
Gruenbaum S.E., Bilotta F. Postoperative ICU management of patients after subarachnoid hemorrhage // Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2014. Vol. 27, № 5. P. 489–493.
Lee J.M. et al. Necessity of mandatory postoperative intensive care unit management after clipping surgery for unruptured intracranial aneurysms // Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2023. Vol. 228. P. 107703.
Akbik F. et al. Jugular Venous Catheterization is Not Associated with Increased Complications in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // Neurocrit. Care. 2025. Vol. 42, № 3. P. 929–936.
Porto G.B.F. et al. Blood Pressure Guideline Adherence in Patients with Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke in the Neurointensive Care Unit Setting // Neurocrit. Care. 2015. Vol. 23, № 3. P. 313–320.
Deem S. et al. Hemodynamic Management in the Prevention and Treatment of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // Neurocrit. Care. 2023. Vol. 39, № 1. P. 81–90.
Merrill D. et al. The Impact of Fluid Balance on Acute Kidney Injury in Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // J. Intensive Care Med. 2024. Vol. 39, № 7. P. 693–700.
Lee J.W. et al. Hypotension and Adverse Outcomes in Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury // JAMA Netw. Open. 2024. Vol. 7, № 11. P. e2444465.
Kutum C. et al. Intraoperative goal-directed fluid therapy in neurosurgical patients: A systematic review // Surg. Neurol. Int. 2024. Vol. 15. P. 233.
Ohkuma H., Tsurutani H., Suzuki S. Incidence and Significance of Early Aneurysmal Rebleeding Before Neurosurgical or Neurological Management // Stroke. 2001. Vol. 32, № 5. P. 1176–1180.
Naidech A.M. et al. Predictors and Impact of Aneurysm Rebleeding After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // Arch. Neurol. 2005. Vol. 62, № 3. P. 410.
Treggiari M.M. et al. Guidelines for the Neurocritical Care Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // Neurocrit. Care. 2023. Vol. 39, № 1. P. 1–28.
Burnol L. et al. Impact of Head-of-Bed Posture on Brain Oxygenation in Patients with Acute Brain Injury: A Prospective Cohort Study // Neurocrit. Care. 2021. Vol. 35, № 3. P. 662–668.
Preiser J.-C. et al. A guide to enteral nutrition in intensive care units: 10 expert tips for the daily practice // Crit. Care. 2021. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 424.
Stechmiller J.K. et al. Guidelines for the prevention of pressure ulcers // Wound Repair Regen. 2008. Vol. 16, № 2. P. 151–168.
Taleb C. et al. Liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategies in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a secondary analysis of the TRAIN study // Crit. Care. 2025. Vol. 29, № 1. P. 67.
English S.W. et al. Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion Strategy in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // N. Engl. J. Med. 2025. Vol. 392, № 11. P. 1079–1088.
Mori T. et al. Improved efficiency of hypervolemic therapy with inhibition of natriuresis by fludrocortisone in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage // J. Neurosurg. 1999. Vol. 91, № 6. P. 947–952.
Harrigan M.R. Cerebral Salt Wasting Syndrome // Crit. Care Clin. 2001. Vol. 17, № 1. P. 125–138.
Ali A. et al. Effectiveness of human albumin for clinical outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhages: a protocol for randomized controlled (HASH) trial // Trials. 2025. Vol. 26, № 1. P. 53.
Chou S.H.-Y. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // Continuum (N. Y). 2021. Vol. 27, № 5. P. 1201–1245.
Marc S. Greenberg: Handbook of neurosurgery, 6th edn. Thieme Medical Publishers, 2006.
Lysakowski C. et al. Transcranial Doppler Versus Angiography in Patients With Vasospasm due to a Ruptured Cerebral Aneurysm // Stroke. 2001. Vol. 32, № 10. P. 2292–2298.
Frontera J.A. et al. Defining Vasospasm After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2009. Vol. 40, № 6. P. 1963–1968.
Vergouwen M.D.I. et al. Definition of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage as an Outcome Event in Clinical Trials and Observational Studies // Stroke. 2010. Vol. 41, № 10. P. 2391–2395.
de Oliveira Manoel A.L. et al. The critical care management of poor-grade subarachnoid haemorrhage // Crit. Care. 2016. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 21.
Sloan M.A. et al. Assessment: Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: [RETIRED] // Neurology. 2004. Vol. 62, № 9. P. 1468–1481.
Francoeur C.L., Mayer S.A. Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage // Crit. Care. 2016. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 277.
Suarez J.I. et al. The Albumin in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (ALISAH) multicenter pilot clinical trial: safety and neurologic outcomes. // Stroke. 2012. Vol. 43, № 3. P. 683–690.
Otsubo H. et al. Normovolaemic induced hypertension therapy for cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 1990. Vol. 103, № 1–2. P. 18–26.
Kosnik E.J., Hunt W.E. Postoperative hypertension in the management of patients with intracranial arterial aneurysms // J. Neurosurg. 1976. Vol. 45, № 2. P. 148–154.
Chalouhi N. et al. Endovascular management of cerebral vasospasm following aneurysm rupture: Outcomes and predictors in 116 patients // Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2014. Vol. 118. P. 26–31.
Bashir A. et al. Intra-arterial nimodipine for cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid haemorrhage: Influence on clinical course and predictors of clinical outcome // Neuroradiol. J. 2016. Vol. 29, № 1. P. 72–81.
Mikeladze K.G. et al. Intra-arterial administration of verapamil for prevention and treatment of cerebral angiospasm after SAH due to cerebral aneurysm rupture // Vopr. neirokhirurgii Im. N.N. Burdenko. 2018. Vol. 82, № 4. P. 23.
Claassen J., Park S. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage // Lancet. 2022. Vol. 400, № 10355. P. 846–862.
Suarez-Rivera O. Acute Hydrocephalus After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // Surg. Neurol. 1998. Vol. 49, № 5. P. 563–565.
Zoerle T. et al. Intracranial Pressure After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage* // Crit. Care Med. 2015. Vol. 43, № 1. P. 168–176.
Magni F. et al. High-Resolution Intracranial Pressure Burden and Outcome in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2015. Vol. 46, № 9. P. 2464–2469.
Okazaki T. et al. Association between dexmedetomidine use and neurological outcomes in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: A retrospective observational study // J. Crit. Care. 2018. Vol. 44. P. 111–116.
Quinn T.J. et al. Functional Outcome Measures in Contemporary Stroke Trials // Int. J. Stroke. 2009. Vol. 4, № 3. P. 200–205.
Eliava Sh.Sh., Filatov Yu.M., Pilipenko Yu.V. et al. [Microsurgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations at the Burdenko Neurosurgery Institute (recent years' experience)]. 2012. Vol. 76, № 3. P. 34–44.
Catapano J.S. et al. Intermediate-grade brain arteriovenous malformations and the boundary of operability using the supplemented Spetzler-Martin grading system // J. Neurosurg. 2022. Vol. 136, № 1. P. 125–133.
Holmes D.R. et al. Left Atrial Appendage Closure as an Alternative to Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2015. Vol. 65, № 24. P. 2614–2623.
Martinez J.L., Macdonald R.L. Surgical Strategies for Acutely Ruptured Arteriovenous Malformations. 2016. P. 166–181.
Krylov V.V., Dashyan V.G. [Surgical treatment of hypertensive cerebellar hematomas]. Cons. Medicum. Nevrologiya. 2009. Vol. 2. P. 9–13.
Hafez A. et al. Timing of surgery for ruptured supratentorial arteriovenous malformations // Acta Neurochir. (Wien). 2017. Vol. 159, № 11. P. 2103–2112.
Hernesniemi J. et al. Present State of Microneurosurgery of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations. 2010. P. 71–76.
Alén J.F. et al. Cerebral microarteriovenous malformations: a series of 28 cases // J. Neurosurg. 2013. Vol. 119, № 3. P. 594–602.
Stemer A.B. et al. Acute embolization of ruptured brain arteriovenous malformations // J. Neurointerv. Surg. 2013. Vol. 5, № 3. P. 196–200.
Saatci I. et al. Endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations with prolonged intranidal Onyx injection technique: long-term results in 350 consecutive patients with completed endovascular treatment course // J. Neurosurg. 2011. Vol. 115, № 1. P. 78–88.
Potts M.B. et al. Curing arteriovenous malformations using embolization // Neurosurg. Focus. 2014. Vol. 37, № 3. P. E19.
Wong J. et al. Microsurgery for ARUBA Trial (A Randomized Trial of Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformation)–Eligible Unruptured Brain Arteriovenous Malformations // Stroke. 2017. Vol. 48, № 1. P. 136–144.
Valavanis A., Yasargil M.G. The Endovascular Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations. 1998. P. 131–214.
Ding D. et al. Radiosurgery for ruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations // J. Neurosurg. 2014. Vol. 121, № 2. P. 470–481.
Niini T. et al. Perioperative Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations Between 2006 and 2014: The Helsinki Protocol // Neurocrit. Care. 2019. Vol. 31, № 2. P. 346–356.
Starke R.M. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation of long-term outcomes in a multicenter cohort // J. Neurosurg. 2017. Vol. 126, № 1. P. 36–44.
Abla A.A. et al. A treatment paradigm for high-grade brain arteriovenous malformations: volume-staged radiosurgical downgrading followed by microsurgical resection // J. Neurosurg. 2015. Vol. 122, № 2. P. 419–432.
Cho W.-S. et al. Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // J. Korean Neurosurg. Soc. 2018. Vol. 61, № 2. P. 127–166.
Thompson B.G. et al. Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms // Stroke. 2015. Vol. 46, № 8. P. 2368–2400.
Karbe A.-G., Vajkoczy P. Postoperative management and follow-up after resection of arteriovenous malformations // J. Neurosurg. Sci. 2018. Vol. 62, № 4.
Torné R., Rodríguez-Hernández A., Lawton M.T. Intraoperative arteriovenous malformation rupture: causes, management techniques, outcomes, and the effect of neurosurgeon experience // Neurosurg. Focus. 2014. Vol. 37, № 3. P. E12.
Choque-Velasquez J. et al. Current advances in epilepsy among patients with arteriovenous malformations // Explor. Neurosci. 2024. Vol. 3, № 3. P. 175–197.
Englot D.J. et al. Seizure Predictors and Control After Microsurgical Resection of Supratentorial Arteriovenous Malformations in 440 Patients // Neurosurgery. 2012. Vol. 71, № 3. P. 572–580.
Zheng P. et al. Early rehabilitation after acute intracerebral hemorrhage in China—a need for new research directions and more data: A systematic review // Geriatr. Nurs. (Minneap). 2025. Vol. 64. P. 103339.
Juckett L.A. et al. Implementation Science to Advance Health Equity in Stroke Rehabilitation // J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2024. Vol. 13, № 7.
Liu N. et al. Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Rehabilitation After Intracerebral Hemorrhage Stroke // Stroke. 2014. Vol. 45, № 12. P. 3502–3507.
Bako A.T. et al. Postacute Discharge Destination and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Among Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage // Stroke. 2025. Vol. 56, № 9. P. 2658–2668.
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 788N dated July 31, 2020, on approval of the procedure for organizing medical rehabilitation for adults. Russian Federation, 2020.
Belkin A.A. et al. [Development and validation of the PITS index for assessing the severity of post-intensive care syndrome: a descriptive prospective non-controlled cohort study]. Ann. Crit. Care. 2024. № 4. P. 58–72.
Hiser S.L. et al. Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): recent updates // J. Intensive Care. 2023. Vol. 11, № 1. P. 23.
Belkin A.A. et al. Rehabilitation in the intensive care unit (RehabICU). Clinical practice recommendations of the national Union of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Specialists of Russia and of the national Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists // Ann. Crit. Care. 2022. № 2. P. 7–40.
Spies C.D. et al. Instruments to measure outcomes of post-intensive care syndrome in outpatient care settings – Results of an expert consensus and feasibility field test // J. Intensive Care Soc. 2021. Vol. 22, № 2. P. 159–174.
Beadman M., Carraretto M. Key elements of an evidence-based clinical psychology service within adult critical care // J. Intensive Care Soc. 2023. Vol. 24, № 2. P. 215–221.
Reimers A., Odin P., Ljung H. Drug-Induced Cognitive Impairment // Drug Saf. 2025. Vol. 48, № 4. P. 339–361.
Chu Y. et al. Instruments to measure postintensive care syndrome: a scoping review protocol // BMJ Open. 2022. Vol. 12, № 10. P. e061048.
Nakanishi N. et al. Instruments to assess post-intensive care syndrome assessment: a scoping review and modified Delphi method study // Crit. Care. 2023. Vol. 27, № 1. P. 430.
Xiao Z. et al. Development and validation of early prediction models for new-onset functional impairment in patients after being transferred from the ICU // Sci. Rep. 2024. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 11902.
Mazwi N. et al. Effects of mobility dose on discharge disposition in critically ill stroke patients // PM&R. 2023. Vol. 15, № 12. P. 1547–1556.
Yen H.-C. et al. Early Mobilization of Mild-Moderate Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients in a Stroke Center: A Randomized Controlled Trial // Neurorehabil. Neural Repair. 2020. Vol. 34, № 1. P. 72–81.
Yang X. et al. More is less: Effect of ICF-based early progressive mobilization on severe aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in the NICU // Front. Neurol. 2022. Vol. 13.
Foudhaili A. et al. Early mobilization in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage may im-prove functional status and reduce cerebral vasospasm rate: a systematic review with meta-analysis // J. Rehabil. Med. 2024. Vol. 56. P. jrm41225.
Mariana de Aquino Miranda J. et al. Early mobilization in acute stroke phase: a systematic review // Top. Stroke Rehabil. 2023. Vol. 30, № 2. P. 157–168.
Sepúlveda P. et al. Protocolized strategies to encourage early mobilization of critical care patients: challenges and success // Crit. Care Sci. 2025. Vol. 37.
Kinoshita T. et al. Evaluation of severe adverse events during rehabilitation for acute-phase patients // Medicine (Baltimore). 2022. Vol. 101, № 25. P. e29516.
Woodbridge H.R. et al. Assessing the safety of physical rehabilitation in critically ill patients: a Delphi study // Crit. Care. 2024. Vol. 28, № 1. P. 144.
Schaller S.J. et al. Guideline on positioning and early mobilisation in the critically ill by an expert panel // Intensive Care Med. 2024. Vol. 50, № 8. P. 1211–1227.
Gregori-Pla C. et al. Blood flow response to orthostatic challenge identifies signatures of the failure of static cerebral autoregulation in patients with cerebrovascular disease // BMC Neurol. 2021. Vol. 21, № 1. P. 154.
Rethnam V. et al. Early mobilisation post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data // Disabil. Rehabil. 2022. Vol. 44, № 8. P. 1156–1163.
Clinical guidelines of the Union of Rehabilitologists of Russia. Patient verticalization during rehabilitation. URL: https://rehabrus.ru/Docs/Protokol_Vertikalizaciya.pdf [Electronic resource].
Zavaliy L.B. et al. Passive verticalization of patients in a multiprofile ICU // Anesteziol. i Reanimatol. 2020. № 6. P. 44.
Kumble S. et al. Physiological Effects of Early Incremental Mobilization of a Patient with Acute Intracerebral and Intraventricular Hemorrhage Requiring Dual External Ventricular Drainage // Neurocrit. Care. 2017. Vol. 27, № 1. P. 115–119.
Küçük A.O. et al. The association of early passive mobilization with intracranial pressure in the adult intensive care unit: A prospective, cohort study // Nurs. Crit. Care. 2025. Vol. 30, № 3.
Ramazanov G.R. et al. Progressive Early Rehabilitation Program Applied to Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Accident // Russ. Neurol. J. 2020. Vol. 25, № 3. P. 17–25.
Imai R. et al. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation during initial mobilization of critically ill patients is associated with clinical outcomes: a prospective observational study // Intensive Care Med. Exp. 2025. Vol. 13, № 1. P. 13.
Yang Y. et al. Clinical effect of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with mechanical ventilation: A meta-analysis // Int. J. Artif. Organs. 2024. Vol. 47, № 2. P. 96–106.
Rodrigues-Gomes R.M. et al. Effects of rapid chest compression technique on intracranial and cerebral perfusion pressures in acute neurocritical patients: a randomized controlled trial // Crit. Care. 2025. Vol. 29, № 1. P. 159.
Rose L. et al. Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021. Vol. 2021, № 10.
Klem H.E. et al. Tidlig aktivitet hos respiratorpasienter – en metaanalyse // Tidsskr. Den Nor. legeforening. 2021.
Eimer C. et al. The Effect of Physical Therapy on Regional Lung Function in Critically Ill Patients // Front. Physiol. 2021. Vol. 12.
Shahid J., Kashif A., Shahid M.K. A Comprehensive Review of Physical Therapy Interventions for Stroke Rehabilitation: Impairment-Based Approaches and Functional Goals. // Brain Sci. 2023. Vol. 13, № 5.
Langton-Frost N. et al. Development and Implementation of a New Model of Care for Patients With Stroke, Acute Hospital Rehabilitation Intensive SErvices // Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2023. Vol. 102, № 2S. P. S13–S18.
Zhou W. et al. Effect of early mobilization combined with early nutrition on acquired weakness in critically ill patients (EMAS): A dual-center, randomized controlled trial // PLoS One. 2022. Vol. 17, № 5. P. e0268599.
Formenti P. et al. Combined Effects of Early Mobilization and Nutrition on ICU-Acquired Weakness // Nutrients. 2025. Vol. 17, № 6. P. 1073.
Suputtitada A. et al. Best Practice Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Modified Scoping Review // Toxins (Basel). 2024. Vol. 16, № 2. P. 98.
Verduzco‐Gutierrez M. et al. AAPM&R consensus guidance on spasticity assessment and management // PM&R. 2024. Vol. 16, № 8. P. 864–887.
Badjatia N. et al. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and High-Protein Supplementation After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Single-Center Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. // Neurocrit. Care. 2021. Vol. 35, № 1. P. 46–55.
Zayed Y. et al. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials // Aust. Crit. Care. 2020. Vol. 33, № 2. P. 203–210.
Dziewas R. et al. Decannulation ahead: a comprehensive diagnostic and therapeutic framework for tracheotomized neurological patients // Neurol. Res. Pract. 2025. Vol. 7, № 1. P. 18.
Dunn K., Rumbach A., Finch E. Dysphagia in non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: a scoping review // Neurosurg. Rev. 2020. Vol. 43, № 4. P. 1079–1087.
Skoretz S.A. et al. A Systematic Review of Tracheostomy Modifications and Swallowing in Adults // Dysphagia. 2020. Vol. 35, № 6. P. 935–947.
Belkin A.A., Ershov V.I., Ivanova G.E. Impairment of swallowing in urgent conditions-postextubation dysphagia // Anesteziol. i Reanimatol. 2018. № 4. P. 76.
McIntyre M. et al. Risk Factors for Postextubation Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis // Laryngoscope. 2022. Vol. 132, № 2. P. 364–374.
Suntrup-Krueger S. et al. Pharyngeal electrical stimulation for postextubation dysphagia in acute stroke: a randomized controlled pilot trial // Crit. Care. 2023. Vol. 27, № 1. P. 383.
McRae J. et al. The role of speech and language therapists in the intensive care unit // J. Intensive Care Soc. 2020. Vol. 21, № 4. P. 344–348.
Barra M.E. et al. Multidisciplinary Approach to Sedation and Early Mobility of Intubated Critically Ill Neurologic Patients Improves Mobility at Discharge // The Neurohospitalist. 2023. Vol. 13, № 4. P. 351–360.
Liu Y. et al. Pharmacological Prevention of Postoperative Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials // Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2019. Vol. 2019. P. 1–10.
Burry L. et al. Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of delirium in critically ill adults // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019. Vol. 2019, № 9.
Ottens T.H. et al. The Delphi Delirium Management Algorithms. A practical tool for clinicians, the result of a modified Delphi expert consensus approach. // Delirium. 2024.
Potievskaya V.I. et al. Sedation of patients in intensive care units // Anesteziol. i Reanimatol. 2020. № 5. P. 7.
Porhomayon J. et al. The Impact of High Versus Low Sedation Dosing Strategy on Cognitive Dysfunction in Survivors of Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // J. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Res. 2015. Vol. 7, № 2. P. 43–48.
Fischer T. et al. Strategies for Pain Assessment in Adult Patients With Delirium: A Scoping Review // J. Pain Symptom Manage. 2019. Vol. 58, № 3. P. 487-502.e11.
Nordness M.F. et al. Depression predicts long-term cognitive impairment in survivors of critical illness // J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021. Vol. 90, № 1. P. 79–86.
Tilburgs B. et al. Associations Between Physical, Cognitive, and Mental Health Domains of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome and Quality of Life: A Longitudinal Multicenter Cohort Study // Crit. Care Med. 2025. Vol. 53, № 1. P. e74–e86.
Mercier L.J. et al. Development and integration of a music therapy program in the neurologic inpatient setting: a qualitative study // Disabil. Rehabil. 2025. Vol. 47, № 9. P. 2304–2313.
Byun E. et al. Sleep Disturbance and Self-management in Adults With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Qualitative Study // Clin. Nurs. Res. 2022. Vol. 31, № 4. P. 632–638.
Tang B.H.Y. et al. Melatonin Use in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Crit. Care Med. 2025. Vol. 53, № 9. P. e1714–e1724.
Fang C. et al. Effect of earplugs and eye masks on the sleep quality of intensive care unit patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis // J. Adv. Nurs. 2021. Vol. 77, № 11. P. 4321–4331.
International Stroke Conference (ISC) 2017. Abstract 93. Presented February 22, 201. (2017). ICH Survivors at High Risk for Depression then Dementia. 23–24.
Algeo N., Aitken L.M. The evolving role of occupational therapists in adult critical care in England // Irish J. Occup. Ther. 2019. Vol. 47, № 2. P. 74–94.
Prohaska C.C. et al. Patterns of utilization and effects of hospital-specific factors on physical, occupational, and speech therapy for critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure in the USA: results of a 5-year sample // Crit. Care. 2019. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 175.
Bellon F. et al. The efficacy of nursing interventions on sleep quality in hospitalized patients: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials // Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2021. Vol. 115. P. 103855.
Belkin A.A. et al. Prolonged Disorder of Consciousness — a New Concept in the Evaluation of Chronical Disorders of Consciousness in ICU Patients. A Multi-Disciplinary Concensus // Ann. Crit. Care. 2021. № 2. P. 7–16.
Stein J. et al. Which Road to Recovery?: Factors Influencing Postacute Stroke Discharge Destinations: A Delphi Study // Stroke. 2022. Vol. 53, № 3. P. 947–955.
Winstein C.J. et al. Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery // Stroke. 2016. Vol. 47, № 6.
Chen Y.-T. et al. Assessment of rehabilitation following subarachnoid haemorrhage in China: findings from the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance // BMC Neurol. 2023. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 291.
Hayward K.S. et al. Control intervention design for preclinical and clinical trials: Consensus-based core recommendations from the third Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable // Int. J. Stroke. 2024. Vol. 19, № 2. P. 169–179.
Teasell R. et al. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations: Rehabilitation, Recovery, and Community Participation following Stroke. Part One: Rehabilitation and Recovery Following Stroke; 6th Edition Update 2019 // Int. J. Stroke. 2020. Vol. 15, № 7. P. 763–788.
Ifejika N.L. et al. Improving Access to Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery: A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association // Stroke. 2025. Vol. 56, № 9.
Fedor B.A. et al. Motor Rehabilitation Provides Modest Functional Benefits After Intracerebral Hemorrhage: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Translational Rehabilitation Studies // Transl. Stroke Res. 2025. Vol. 16, № 2. P. 484–511.
Dunn K., Rumbach A., Finch E. Language function in the acute phase following non-traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage: A prospective cohort study // J. Commun. Disord. 2022. Vol. 96. P. 106192.
Huang J. et al. Effects of physical therapy-based rehabilitation on recovery of upper limb motor function after stroke in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // Ann. Palliat. Med. 2022. Vol. 11, № 2. P. 521–531.
Chen J., Or C.K., Chen T. Effectiveness of Using Virtual Reality–Supported Exercise Therapy for Upper Extremity Motor Rehabilitation in Patients With Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials // J. Med. Internet Res. 2022. Vol. 24, № 6. P. e24111.
Zhang T. et al. Chinese Stroke Association guidelines for clinical management of cerebrovascular disorders: executive summary and 2019 update of clinical management of stroke rehabilitation // Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 2020. Vol. 5, № 3. P. 250–259.
Laver K.E. et al. Telerehabilitation services for stroke // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020. Vol. 2020, № 1.
ZHU Jinfeng, ZHANG Yuanxing, WANG Fang et al. The effectiveness and safety of telerehabilitation management in stroke patients:an overview of systematic reviews // Chinese J. Nurs. 2022. Vol. 57, № 12. P. 1447–1455.
Nascimento L.R. et al. Home-based exercises are as effective as equivalent doses of centre-based exercises for improving walking speed and balance after stroke: a systematic review // J. Physiother. 2022. Vol. 68, № 3. P. 174–181.
Puthucheary Z. et al. The Post-ICU presentation screen (PICUPS) and rehabilitation prescription (RP) for intensive care survivors part II: Clinical engagement and future directions for the national Post-Intensive care Rehabilitation Collaborative // J. Intensive Care Soc. 2022. Vol. 23, № 3. P. 264–272.
Sazonov I.E. et al. The use of cytoflavin in the acute period of hemorrhagic stroke // Zhurnal Nevrol. i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova. 2018. Vol. 118, № 2. P. 23.
Belkin A.A. et al. Results of a cohort single-center randomized study of the modulating effect of the drug Mexidol in the rehabilitation of patients who suffered acute cerebral insufficiency // S.S. Korsakov J. Neurol. Psychiatry. 2024. Vol. 124, № 4. P. 108.
Belkin A.A. et al. Adjuvant pharmacological modulation with Cytoflavin in rehabilitation at stages 2—3 in patients with acute cerebral insufficiency and post-intensive care syndrome // S.S. Korsakov J. Neurol. Psychiatry. 2025. Vol. 125, № 3. P. 78.
Belkin A.A., Belkin V.A., Vasilchenko I.E. Dynamics of emotional-cognitive and motor disorder domains in the Post Intensive Care Syndrome structure in acute cerebral insufficiency patients // Phys. Rehabil. Med. Med. Rehabil. 2024. Vol. 6, № 4. P. 348–359.
Marquez-Romero J.M. et al. Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute intracerebral hemorrhage, the FMRICH trial // Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2020. Vol. 190. P. 105656.
Kubiszewski P. et al. Association of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Use After Intracerebral Hemorrhage With Hemorrhage Recurrence and Depression Severity // JAMA Neurol. 2021. Vol. 78, № 1. P. 61.
Epprecht L. et al. Sexual Dysfunction After Good-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage // World Neurosurg. 2018. Vol. 111. P. e449–e453.
Golanov A.V., Kostyuchenko V.V. Neyrokhirurgiya na Gamma-Nozhe [Gamma Knife neurosurgery]. 2018. Vol. 708.
Thrash G.W. et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery treatment of pediatric arteriovenous malformations: a PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis // Child’s Nerv. Syst. 2025. Vol. 41, № 1. P. 188.
Lim J.H., Kim M.J. Considerations for the Use of Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Treat Large Arteriovenous Malformations // Biomedicines. 2024. Vol. 12, № 9. P. 2003.
Shaaban A. et al. Repeat Single-Session Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines // Neurosurgery. 2025. Vol. 96, № 1. P. 29–40.
Chapman N. et al. Effects of a Perindopril-Based Blood Pressure–Lowering Regimen on the Risk of Recurrent Stroke According to Stroke Subtype and Medical History // Stroke. 2004. Vol. 35, № 1. P. 116–121.
Biffi A. et al. Association Between Blood Pressure Control and Risk of Recurrent Intracerebral Hemorrhage // JAMA. 2015. Vol. 314, № 9. P. 904.
Hilkens N.A. et al. Blood pressure levels and the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage after ischemic stroke // Neurology. 2017. Vol. 88, № 2. P. 177–181.
Al-Shahi Salman R. et al. Effects of oral anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation after spontaneous intracranial haemorrhage in the UK: a randomised, open-label, assessor-masked, pilot-phase, non-inferiority trial // Lancet Neurol. 2021. Vol. 20, № 10. P. 842–853.
Pennlert J. et al. Optimal Timing of Anticoagulant Treatment After Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation // Stroke. 2017. Vol. 48, № 2. P. 314–320.
Schreuder F.H.B.M. et al. Apixaban versus no anticoagulation after anticoagulation-associated intracerebral haemorrhage in patients with atrial fibrillation in the Netherlands (APACHE-AF): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial // Lancet Neurol. 2021. Vol. 20, № 11. P. 907–916.
Reddy V.Y. et al. 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure // J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017. Vol. 70, № 24. P. 2964–2975.
Hucker W.J. et al. WATCHMAN implantation in patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and intracranial hemorrhage // J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol. 2020. Vol. 59, № 2. P. 415–421.
Nielsen-Kudsk J.E. et al. Left atrial appendage occlusion versus standard medical care in patients with atrial fibrillation and intracerebral haemorrhage: a propensity score-matched follow-up study // EuroIntervention. 2017. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 371–378.
Schrag M. et al. Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Patients with Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy and Atrial Fibrillation: the LAA-CAA Cohort // Transl. Stroke Res. 2021. Vol. 12, № 2. P. 259–265.
Kuramatsu J.B. et al. Management of therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage and mechanical heart valves // Eur. Heart J. 2018. Vol. 39, № 19. P. 1709–1723.
Cho S.-M. et al. Reversal and Resumption of Antithrombotic Therapy in LVAD-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2019. Vol. 108, № 1. P. 52–58.
Islam M.M. et al. Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke in Patients Exposed to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies // Neuroepidemiology. 2018. Vol. 51, № 3–4. P. 166–176.
Ungprasert P., Matteson E.L., Thongprayoon C. Nonaspirin Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Hemorrhagic Stroke // Stroke. 2016. Vol. 47, № 2. P. 356–364.
Sabatine M.S. et al. Evolocumab and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease // N. Engl. J. Med. 2017. Vol. 376, № 18. P. 1713–1722.
Robinson J.G. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Alirocumab in Reducing Lipids and Cardiovascular Events // N. Engl. J. Med. 2015. Vol. 372, № 16. P. 1489–1499.
Sanz-Cuesta B.E., Saver J.L. Lipid-Lowering Therapy and Hemorrhagic Stroke Risk // Stroke. 2021. Vol. 52, № 10. P. 3142–3150.
Barr J.C., Ogilvy C.S. Selection of Treatment Modalities or Observation of Arteriovenous Malformations // Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2012. Vol. 23, № 1. P. 63–75.
Brain arteriovenous malformations. 2021. P. 171–178.
Holloway R.G. et al. Palliative and End-of-Life Care in Stroke // Stroke. 2014. Vol. 45, № 6. P. 1887–1916.
Epstein R.M. et al. Why The Nation Needs A Policy Push On Patient-Centered Health Care // Health Aff. 2010. Vol. 29, № 8. P. 1489–1495.
Fromme E.K. et al. POLST Registry Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders and Other Patient Treatment Preferences // JAMA. 2012. Vol. 307, № 1. P. 34.
Rosen D.S., Macdonald R.L. Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scales: A Systematic Review // Neurocrit. Care. 2005. Vol. 2, № 2. P. 110–118.
Report of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons Committee on a Universal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Grading Scale // J. Neurosurg. 1988. Vol. 68, № 6.
Roy D., Milot G., Raymond J. Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Aneurysms // Stroke. 2001. Vol. 32, № 9. P. 1998–2004.
Suponeva N.A. et al. Validation of the modified Rankin Scale in Russia // Neurol. Neuropsychiatry, Psychosom. 2018. Vol. 10, № 4. P. 36–39.
Meng X. et al. Radiosurgery-Based AVM Scale Is Proposed for Combined Embolization and Gamma Knife Surgery for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations // Front. Neurol. 2021. Vol. 12.
Zabolotskikh I.B. et al. Anesthesia and intensive care for patients with COVID-19. Russian Federation of anesthesiologists and reanimatologists guidelines // Ann. Crit. Care. 2021. № 1-S. P. 9–143.
Adams H.P. et al. Baseline NIH Stroke Scale score strongly predicts outcome after stroke // Neurology. 1999. Vol. 53, № 1. P. 126–126.
Ivankova E.O., Darvin V. V., Bessmertnykh M.A. Evaluation of the immediate and long-term results of endovascular treatment of ruptured vertebrobasilar artery aneurysms in an acute period of hemorrhage // Russ. J. Neurosurg. 2019. Vol. 20, № 4. P. 31–37.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
1. Neurosurgeons and endovascular surgeons
Krylov Vladimir Viktorovich – Academician of the RAS, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Chief freelance specialist neurosurgeon of the Russian Ministry of Health, Director of the Institute of Functional Neurosurgery of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies", Head of the Department of Fundamental Neurosurgery of the Institute of Neurosciences and Neurotechnologies of the Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education "Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University" of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief Researcher of the Department of Emergency Neurosurgery of the State Budgetary Healthcare Institution "Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Care of the Moscow Healthcare Department"
Usachev Dmitry Yuryevich – Academician of the RAS, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Director of the Federal State Autonomous Institution "National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Neurosurgery of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Additional Professional Education "Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, President of the Association of Neurosurgeons of Russia
Arustamyan Sergey Razmikovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Leading Researcher at the 4th Department, National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Professor at the Department of Neurosurgery with Neuroscience Courses, National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Bakharev Evgeny Yuryevich – Ph.D. in Medicine, Senior Researcher at the Department of Emergency Neurosurgery, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Berestov Vadim Vyacheslavovich – Ph.D. in Medicine, Researcher at the Research Center for Endovascular Neurosurgery, Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Neurosurgeon at the Morozov City Children's Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Godkov Ivan Mikhailovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Head of the Neurosurgery and Neurotrauma Service, Kommunarka Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Associate Professor at the Department of Fundamental Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurosciences and Neurotechnologies, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Dmitriev Alexander Yuryevich – Ph.D. in Medicine, Associate Professor at the Department of Neurosurgery, Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Neurosurgeon at the Department of Emergency Neurosurgery, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Orlov Kirill Yuryevich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor at the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery with a Course in Complex Rehabilitation, Faculty of Continuing Medical Education, Medical Institute, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice Lumumba, Head of the Research Center for Endovascular Neurosurgery, Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Neurosurgeon at the Neurosurgical Department, Morozov City Children's Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Director of the Academician F.A. Serbinenko Association of Endovascular Neurosurgeons
Pilipenko Yury Viktorovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Leading Researcher at the 3rd Department, National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Associate Professor at the Department of Neurosurgery with Neuroscience Courses, National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Polunina Natalya Alekseevna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Associate Professor at the Department of Fundamental Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurosciences and Neurotechnologies, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Senior Researcher at the Department of Emergency Neurosurgery, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Neurosurgeon at the Kommunarka Moscow Multidisciplinary Clinical Center of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Prirodov Alexander Vladislavovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor at the Department of Fundamental Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurosciences and Neurotechnologies, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Head of the Neurosurgical Department, Leading Researcher, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Rak Vyacheslav Avgustovich – Ph.D. in Medicine, Associate Professor at the Department of Fundamental Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurosciences and Neurotechnologies, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Khamurzov Valery Albertovich – Neurosurgeon at the Department of Emergency Neurosurgery, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Kheyreddin Ali Sadek – D.Sc. in Medicine, Leading Researcher, National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Eliava Shalva Shalvovich – Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Head of the 3rd Department, National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Yakovlev Sergey Borisovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Head of the 4th Department, National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Professor at the Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
2. Neurologists
Shamalov Nikolay Anatolyevich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Chief freelance Specialist Neurologist of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Chief freelance Specialist Neurologist of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Director of the Institute of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke, Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Executive Secretary of the National Stroke Association.
Alasheev Andrey Marisovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Chief freelance Specialist Neurologist of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in the Ural Federal District, Head of the Neurological Department for Patients with Acute Cerebrovascular Accidents, Sverdlovsk Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1, WSO member and ESO fellow.
Belousova Olga Bennuanovna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Chief Researcher at the 3rd Department, National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Professor at the Department of Neurosurgery with Neuroscience Courses, National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Voznyuk Igor Alekseevich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Chief freelance Specialist Neurologist of the Health Committee of Saint Petersburg, Chief freelance Specialist Neurologist of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in the Northwestern Federal District, Professor at the Department of Neurology, Deputy Chief Physician for Neurology, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University.
Gekht Alla Borisovna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the Solovyov Research and Practical Center for Mental Health of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Professor at the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Member of the Presidium of the National Stroke Association, Scientific Secretary of the All-Russian Society of Neurologists
Gusev Evgeny Ivanovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor at the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, President of the National Stroke Association, Chairman of the All-Russian Society of Neurologists.
Zavaliy Lesya Bogdanovna – Ph.D. in Medicine, Senior Researcher at the Scientific Department of Emergency Neurology and Restorative Treatment, Neurologist, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Koltsov Ivan Alekseevich – Ph.D. in Medicine, Senior Researcher at the Research Laboratory of Cerebral Vascular Diseases, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Senior Researcher at the Department of Neuroimmunology, Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia.
Marskaya Nataliya Andreevna – Researcher at the Department of Vascular Diseases of the Nervous System Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia.
Martynov Mikhail Yuryevich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, First Deputy General Director of the Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Head of the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Scientific Secretary of the All-Russian Society of Neurologists, Board Member of the National Stroke Association.
Fidler Mikhail Sergeevich – Expert Analyst at the Department of Analytical Work, Directorate for the Implementation of National Medical Research Center Functions in Neurology, Assistant Professor at the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Faculty of General Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Kharitonova Tatyana Vitalievna – Ph.D. in Medicine, Senior Researcher, Saint Petersburg I.I. Janelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine.
Khasanova Dina Rustemovna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Professor at the Department of Neurology, Kazan State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Chief freelance Neurologist of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation in the Volga Federal District, Board Member of the National Stroke Association, Board Member of the All-Russian Society of Neurologists.
Shchukin Ivan Alexandrovich – Ph.D. in Medicine, Associate Professor at the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Medical Genetics, Faculty of General Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Senior Researcher at the Department of Neuroimmunology, Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia
Yanishevsky Stanislav Nikolaevich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Head of the Research Laboratory of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Professor at the Department of Neurology with Clinic, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, President of the Association "Society of Neurologists of Saint Petersburg and Leningrad Region"
3. Radiologists
Grigorieva Elena Vladimirovna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Head of the Department of Radiology, Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, N.A. Semashko Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Head of the Department of Radiation Diagnostics, University Clinic of the N.A. Semashko Research Institute of Clinical Medicine
Igor N. Pronin – Academician of the RAS, Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of X-ray and Radioisotope Diagnostic Methods, Deputy Director of the Academician N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Russian Ministry of Health
4. Radiation therapists
Golanov A.V. – Corresponding Member of the RAS, Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Radiotherapy, Academician N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Russian Ministry of Health
Lestrovaya Arina Igorevna – Cand. Sc. (Med.), Junior Researcher, Department of Radiotherapy, Academician N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Russian Ministry of Health
5. Anesthesiologists and intensive care physicians
Baranich Anastasia Ivanovna – Cand. Sc. (Med.), Anesthesiologist-Intensivist, Clinical Pharmacologist, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Academician N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Russian Ministry of Health
Karpunin Andrey Yuryevich – Cand. Sc. (Med.), First Deputy Minister of Health of the Republic of Altai, Deputy Director for Organizational and Methodological Work, Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine
Kulikov Alexander Sergeevich – Dr. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Academician N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Russian Ministry of Health
Kurdyumova Nataliya Vyacheslavovna - Dr. Sc. (Med.), Anesthesiologist-Intensivist, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Academician N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Russian Ministry of Health
Lubnin Andrey Yuryevich – Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Leading Researcher, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Academician N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Russian Ministry of Health
Petриkov Sergey Sergeevich – Academician of the RAS, Professor of the RAS, Dr. Sc. (Med.), Director of the Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Russian University of Medicine of the Russian Ministry of Health, President of the Interregional Public Organization "Association of Neuroanesthesiologists and Neurointensivists"
Savin Ivan Anatolyevich – Dr. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Reanimation and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Academician N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery of the Russian Ministry of Health
6. Rehabilitation specialists
Ivanova Galina Evgenyevna – Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Research Center for Medical Rehabilitation, Federal Center of Brain Research and Neurotechnologies of the FMBA of Russia, Head of the Department of Medicosocial Stroke Rehabilitation, Research Institute of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke, Head of the Department of Medical Rehabilitation, Institute of Professional Education, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chairman of the Dissertation Council at Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in medical rehabilitation of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chairman of the Presidium of the All-Russian Public Organization for the Promotion of Medical Rehabilitology "Union of Rehabilitologists of Russia", Secretary General of the Russian Association for Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation of Patients and Persons with Disabilities.
Belkin Andrey Avgustovich – Dr. Sc. (Med.), Professor of the Departments of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine and Nervous Diseases, Ural State Medical University, Director of the Clinical Institute of Brain, Chief freelance rehabilitation specialist of the Russian Ministry of Health in the Ural Federal District.
Conflict of interest: none.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
neurologists
neurosurgeons
anesthesiologists-resuscitators
physicians in medical rehabilitation
radiologists
Table 1. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Scale for grading levels of evidence certainty (LEC) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definition |
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Scale for grading grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.
The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Federal Law No. 323-FZ of November 21, 2011 (as amended on July 2, 2021) "On the Fundamentals of Protecting Public Health in the Russian Federation" (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2011, No. 48, Art. 6724) (with amendments and additions, effective from October 1, 2021) (https://roszdravnadzor.gov.ru/documents/100)
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 203n dated May 10, 2017, "On Approval of Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Medical Care" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of Russia on May 17, 2017, No. 46740); (http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201705170016?rangeSize=1) valid until August 31, 2025;
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 203n dated April 14, 2025, "On Approval of Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Medical Care" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of Russia on May 28, 2025, No. 82382); (http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/document/0001202505290045); entered into force on September 1, 2025;
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 103n dated February 28, 2019, "On Approval of the Procedure and Deadlines for the Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Their Revision, Standard Template of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Requirements for Their Structure, Composition and Scientific Validity of Information Included in Clinical Practice Guidelines."
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) (https://mkb-10.com/);
State Register of Medicines (http://www.grls.rosminzdrav.ru/grls.aspx);
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 804n dated October 13, 2017, "On Approval of the Nomenclature of Medical Services", registered with the Ministry of Justice on November 7, 2017, registration No. 48808 (as amended on March 24, 2020)
Table 1. Methods of communication with post-stroke patients used in palliative care [439]
Method | Comment/Example |
Trust-building strategies | Encourage patients and families to communicate; acknowledge mistakes; be humble; show respect; avoid imposing decisions; listen carefully before responding. |
"Warning shot" | When initiating the discussion of bad news: "I'm afraid I have some bad news to share with you." |
Use silence effectively | After delivering bad news, resist the temptation to fill the pause with new medical facts. |
Pacing information and periodic feedback | "Are we on the right track?" "What important things to you have we not mentioned?" |
Use the word "dying" effectively. | "Based on what is happening to you and how sick you are, I believe that you (your loved one) are dying." |
Use the word "sorry" with caution. | Often misconstrued as detachment, pity, or an admission of responsibility. |
Statements such as "I wish" | Simultaneous expression of empathy and treatment limitations: "I wish we had better treatments for your condition." |
Help develop coping strategies. | "What gives you strength or support?" "What has helped in the past?" |
Communication tools for conflict resolution | Active listening, self-disclosure, explaining one's perspective, reframing, and brainstorming |
Hope-reframing strategies | Light humor, life review, focusing on meaningful actions |
Summarize and state your understanding. | "Let me make sure I understood you correctly." |
Responding to emotions: | |
Name the expressed emotion. | "I see this is very upsetting." "It sounds like you are overwhelmed by this news." |
Acknowledge and express empathy if sincere. | "I can imagine how hard this is." "I probably would feel the same way." "I can't imagine how difficult this is for you." |
Validate family behavior. | "Anyone in your place would be upset." "Many people would be angry right now." |
Support the family by expressing readiness to help. | "We will get through this together." "Would you like me to call someone?" |
Learn more about what lies beneath the emotion | "Tell me what is upsetting you the most." "Tell me what is bothering you the most." |
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms
Appendix B1. Algorithm for the management of a patient with hemorrhagic stroke of the hypertensive intracerebral hematoma type (diagnosis and choice of surgical treatment method)

Appendix B2. Algorithm for the inactivation of antithrombotic agents (B01) in hypertensive intracerebral hematoma [5, 37, 116, 117].
Appendix B3. STOP signals for initiating and continuing rehabilitation procedures [330, 331].
Absolute contraindications to the initiation of mobilization:
Acute myocardial infarction at the time of mobilization initiation
Subarachnoid hemorrhage with an unclipped aneurysm
Shock
Pulmonary embolism, progressive deep vein thrombosis according to ultrasound data, or the presence of a floating thrombus (in the absence of a vena cava filter, temporary or permanent***)
Unstable fracture of the spine, pelvis, or lower extremities
Patient refusal
Need for neuromuscular blockade
Active bleeding
External cardiac pacing
Relative contraindications to the initiation of mobilization:
Absence of a trained anesthesiologist-reanimatologist and a medical rehabilitation specialist in the multidisciplinary rehabilitation team (MDRT), as well as the lack of adequate instrumental monitoring capabilities at the rehabilitation stages
Dynamic STOP signals
№ | Monitoring section | Range of acceptable values ⚠︎ | Recording method | Contraindications to initiation or STOP signals during the procedure* ⛔️ |
Mandatory modalities | ||||
1 | Volumic status | negative PLR test | clinical test | positive PLR test |
2 | Systolic blood pressure (SBP) | >90; <180 mmHg >90; <200 | non-invasive (invasive when indicated by the underlying disease) device monitoring | ✓ Decrease in SBP by more than 20 mmHg or 20% from baseline ✓ SBP <100 or >180 for more than 3 minutes of the manipulation |
3 | Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) | >50; <110 mmHg | ✓ Decrease in DBP by 10 mmHg or 20% from baseline for more than 3 minutes ✓ DBP <50 or >110 | |
4 | Mean arterial pressure (MAP) | >60 mmHg <110 mmHg | ✓ MAP <60 or >110 ✓ Decrease in mean arterial pressure by 15 mmHg | |
5 | Central hemodynamics | no signs of acute coronary syndrome | Electrocardiographic monitoring (ECG monitoring) | ✓ ST-segment depression (>2 mm) with normal resting ECG ✓ ST-segment elevation (>1 mm) in leads without pathological Q waves (except V1 or AVR) ✓ Negative or evolving T waves |
6 | Heart rhythm | Sinus rhythm or permanent atrial fibrillation | ✓ Newly onset arrhythmia] ✓ Appearance of bundle branch block, especially if indistinguishable from ventricular tachycardia ("wide complex tachycardia") ✓ Increase in ventricular extrasystoles, especially if exceeding 30% of sinus beats | |
7 | Heart rate (HR) | >50; <130 bpm | non-invasive instrumental or clinical monitoring | ✓ <60 or >130 for 3 minutes or a 20% increase in heart rate |
8 | Pharmacological hemodynamic support | Dopamine <10 mcg/kg/min Norepinephrine <0.1 mcg/kg/min | Increase within 3 minutes after the start of the maneuver in the consumption of drugs for adequate hemodynamic support | |
9 | Saturation (SpO2) | >90% | pulse oximetry | Decrease <90% for 3 minutes, desaturation by 4%-5% or more from baseline |
10 | Level of consciousness or sedation | sedation scale RASS = [-5;2] Patient condition not requiring additional sedation and/or neuroleptic therapy (“calm patient”). | clinical monitoring or BIS (EEG) monitoring (Video-EEG monitoring) | ✓ RASS <-3 or >2 ✓ Decrease in level of consciousness by 1 and more than 2 points ✓ Increased need for sedation (including for mechanical ventilation synchronization) ✓ Seizure activity ✓ Psychomotor agitation |
11 | Pain status | 0 on the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS) or 0 on the VAS scale | clinical monitoring | onset or intensification of pain |
12 | Respiratory rate (RR) | >10; <40 >5; <40 | non-invasive instrumental or clinical monitoring | ✓ Brady- or tachypnea ✓ dyspnea and wheezing |
13 | Axillary temperature | >36,0; <38,5oC | thermometry | <36.0 or >38.5 |
14 | Borg Dyspnea Scale | <11-13> | clinical monitoring | Borg Dyspnea Scale >13 |
15 | Autonomic nervous system status | absence of clinical signs of dysfunction | clinical control | Paroxysm of acute dysautonomia: onset of diaphoresis; tachycardia; hyperthermia; increased muscle tone, pallor, weakness |
Additional modalities for patients on mechanical ventilation | ||||
1 | Synchrony with mechanical ventilation | Synchrony | clinical observation | Desynchrony |
2 | Inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) | <60% | ventilator gas analyzer | increased oxygen demand |
Respiratory index PaO2/FiO2 | <300 – acute lung injury; <200 – acute respiratory distress syndrome Normal 500 (PaO2:FiO2 = 100 mmHg / 0.21 = 476) | gas analyzer | Any decrease in the respiratory index | |
4 | Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) | <60 mmHg | gas analyzer | increase in hypercapnia |
Z | Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) | <10 cm H2 O | ventilator monitor | Increase in PEEP level |
Appendix C. Patient Information
Information for the patient, patient's relatives, and caregivers
Stroke is an acute cerebrovascular event caused by the rupture or occlusion of a blood vessel supplying the brain. Signs of a stroke include the sudden onset of weakness in the facial muscles or limbs, especially on one side of the body, sensory disturbances, also most commonly on one side, and difficulty speaking or understanding speech. In severe cases, loss of consciousness occurs.
The condition can be recognized on the spot immediately. The "FAST" test is used for this purpose. Ask the person to:
"F" (Face) – Smile. The smile may be uneven, the corner of the mouth on one side may point downward instead of upward, and the face may be drooping.
"A" (Arms) – Raise both arms. The arms may not rise equally, or one may not rise at all.
"S" (Speech) – Speak a simple sentence. Speech may be slurred, or the instruction may not be understood.
It is very important to note that all these symptoms occur SUDDENLY (ACUTELY)! If the person has difficulty performing any of these tasks, you must immediately call an ambulance, describe the symptoms, and inform the arriving paramedics of the time of symptom onset. Before the ambulance arrives, make the patient comfortable, with the head and shoulders elevated to prevent flexion, loosen restrictive clothing, and ensure a sufficient supply of fresh air. Do not give anything by mouth; treatment for a stroke patient is carried out exclusively in a hospital in a specialized department.
Following the inpatient treatment course upon discharge, the patient is advised to continue treatment, which includes medications to prevent a recurrent stroke. The patient must strictly follow all recommendations of the physician supervising them for the required period. If any new symptoms appear, seek medical attention immediately.
A patient who has suffered a hemorrhagic stroke requires follow-up by a neurologist at their place of residence, blood pressure monitoring (a blood pressure log must be maintained), increased physical activity, body weight control, proper nutrition, and smoking cessation.
Blood pressure and heart rate monitoring log for a patient with hemorrhagic stroke
Date | Morning | Evening | ||
Blood pressure | Heart rate | Blood pressure | Heart rate | |
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. Hunt-Hess scale
Russian title: Hunt-Hess Classification
Original title: Classification of patients with intracranial aneurysms according to surgical risk
Source: [18]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: assessment of surgical risk depending on the timing of intervention in intracranial aneurysm repair
Content (template) and key (interpretation):
Grade | Description |
I | Asymptomatic or mild headache, slight nuchal rigidity, cranial nerve palsy |
II | Cranial nerve palsy (III nerve) or moderate to severe headache, nuchal rigidity, cranial nerve palsy |
III | Drowsiness, confusion, or mild focal deficit |
IV | Stupor, moderate to severe hemiparesis, early signs of decerebration and autonomic dysfunction |
V | Deep coma, decerebrate rigidity, agonal state |
* Serious systemic diseases and/or vasospasm downgrade the patient to a lower grade
Appendix G2. Severity of hemorrhage on CT based on the original and modified Fisher scales
Russian title: Fisher scale (original and modified)
Original title: Fisher scale, modified Fisher scale
Source: [11,12]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: assessment of hemorrhage severity on CT
Content (template) and key (interpretation):
Grade | Original Fisher scale | Modified Fisher scale |
0 | - | No SAH and IVH |
1 | No SAH and IVH | SAH, thin layer, no IVH |
2 | SAH, thin layer <1 mm | SAH, thin layer <1 mm, with IVH |
3 | SAH, thick layer >1 mm | SAH, thick layer >1 mm, no IVH |
4 | ICH or IVH | SAH, thick layer >1 mm, with IVH |
Appendix G3. Severity of intraventricular hemorrhage according to D.A. Graeb
Russian title: Severity of intraventricular hemorrhage according to D.A. Graeb
Original title: none
Source: [13]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: assessment of intraventricular hemorrhage severity
Content (template) and key (interpretation):
Localization | Points |
Lateral ventricles (each ventricle is evaluated separately) | 0 – no blood |
1 – traces of blood or minor hemorrhage | |
2 – less than half of the ventricle is filled with blood | |
3 – more than half of the ventricle is filled with blood | |
4 – ventricle is filled and distended with blood | |
Third and fourth ventricles | 0 – no blood |
1 – presence of blood, ventricle not enlarged | |
2 – ventricle is filled and distended with blood | |
Points | 0-12 |
Appendix G4. Glasgow Coma Scale
Russian title: Glasgow Coma Scale
Original name: Glasgow Coma Scale
Source: [442]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: assessment of surgical risk depending on the timing of intervention in intracranial aneurysm repair
Content (template):
Score | Eye opening | Verbal response | Motor response |
1 | No | None | No movement |
2 | Opens to pain stimulus | Makes sounds, but no words | Pathological extension in response to pain (decerebrate rigidity) |
3 | Opens in response to voice | Utters single words | Pathological flexion in response to pain (decorticate rigidity) |
4 | Opens spontaneously, tracks | Utters phrases, but speech is confused | Purposeless movements in response to pain |
5 | - | Oriented, quick and correct answer to a given question | Localizes pain, attempts to withdraw from it |
6 | - | - | Executes movements to verbal command |
Key (interpretation):
Score | Degrees of impaired consciousness |
15 | Clear consciousness |
13-14 | Moderate obnubilation |
10-12 | Deep obnubilation |
8-9 | Sopor (Stupor) |
6-7 | Moderate coma |
4-5 | Deep coma |
3 | Broughton coma (terminal coma) |
Appendix G5. Assessment of the severity of patients with SAH using the WFNS scale
Russian title: World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) Grading
Original title: World Federation of Neurological Surgeons (WFNS) Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (SAH) Grading
Source: [443]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: Assessment of the severity of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage
Content (template) and key (interpretation):
WFNS Grade 0 SAH: unruptured aneurysm.
WFNS Grade I SAH: Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15, no major neurological deficit (aphasia, hemiparesis/hemiplegia).
WFNS Grade II SAH: Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-14, no major neurological deficit.
WFNS Grade III SAH: Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13-14, major neurological deficit present.
WFNS Grade IV SAH: Glasgow Coma Scale score of 7-12, major neurological deficit present/absent.
WFNS Grade V SAH: Glasgow Coma Scale score of 3-6, major neurological deficit present/absent.
Appendix G6. Hijdra scale for assessing the intensity of aneurysmal SAH
Russian name: Hijdra scale
Original name: Hunt-Hess classification
Source: [18]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: evaluation of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage severity
Content (template) and key (interpretation):

Assessment of each of the 10 basal cisterns and fissures separately on a scale according to the amount of blood:
no blood = 0,
small amount = 1,
moderate amount = 2,
completely filled with blood = 3.
*blood clots that exceed the true dimensions of the cistern or fissure are scored as 3 points
Calculation of the amount of blood in the subarachnoid space [sum of scores]; range = 0-30.
The average score is used for an inadequately visualized cistern or fissure.
Assessment of blood in the four cerebral ventricles:
no blood = 0,
sedimentation in the lower part of the ventricle = 1,
partially filled = 2,
completely filled = 3.
Calculation of the amount of blood in the cerebral ventricles [sum of scores]; range = 0-12
Appendix G7. Raymond classification of aneurysm occlusion grades
Russian name: Raymond classification
Original title: none
Source: [444]
Type: other (classification)
Purpose: evaluation of aneurysm occlusion grades
Content (template):
angiographic scheme used to assess the degree of occlusion of intracranial aneurysms following endovascular treatment.
Key (interpretation):
Raymond I – complete aneurysm occlusion
Raymond II – filling of the aneurysm neck
Raymond III – residual aneurysm filling
Appendix G8. Intracerebral hemorrhage outcome prediction scale
Russian name: Intracerebral Hemorrhage Outcome Score
Original name: The ICH score
Source: [38]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: prediction of intracerebral hemorrhage outcomes
Content (template):
Indicator | Points |
Glasgow Coma Scale, points | |
3-4 | 2 |
5-12 | 1 |
13-15 | 0 |
ICH volume, cm3 | |
30 or more | 1 |
Less than 30 | 0 |
Intraventricular hemorrhage | |
present | 1 |
none | 0 |
Infratentorial ICH location | |
yes | 1 |
none | 0 |
Patient age, years | |
80 or more | 1 |
Less than 80 | 0 |
Total score | 0-6 |
Key (interpretation): mortality depends on the score and is as follows: 0 points – 0%, 1 point – 13%, 2 points – 26%, 3 points – 72%, 4 points – 97%, 5-6 points – 100%.
Appendix G9. Modified Rankin Scale
Russian name: Modified Rankin Scale
Original name: The Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Source: [445]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: degree of functional limitation in stroke survivors (to assess overall disability and approximate patient dependency on the assistance of others)
Content (template) and key (interpretation):
Score | Description of condition |
0 | No symptoms |
1 | No significant functional limitations despite existing symptoms; the patient is able to carry out normal daily duties and activities |
2 | Slight functional impairment; the patient is unable to carry out some previous activities but is still able to manage their affairs without outside help |
3 | Moderate functional impairment. Requires some outside assistance, but walks independently without outside help |
4 | Moderately severe functional impairment. Unable to walk independently (without the assistance of another person). The patient is unable to attend to bodily needs without outside help |
5 | Severe functional impairment. Bedridden patient. Incontinent of bowel and bladder. Requires constant attention, assistance, and nursing care |
6 | Dead |
Key (interpretation): 0 points correspond to no functional limitations in the patient, including minor ones; 1 point corresponds to no significant limitations despite the presence of some symptoms. The patient is able to carry out all normal activities and duties; 2 points correspond to slight disability. The patient is unable to carry out previous activities, but can manage daily affairs without outside help; 3 points correspond to moderate disability. The patient requires some outside assistance, but is able to walk independently (including using walking aids or a walker); 4 points correspond to moderately severe disability. The patient is unable to walk and attend to personal needs without outside help; 5 points correspond to severe disability. The patient is bedridden and incontinent of urine and feces. Constant care is required.
Notes: the evaluator should not attempt to separate disability due to stroke from disability due to other causes.
Appendix G10. Spetzler-Martin Scale (1986)
Russian name: Spetzler-Martin Scale
Original name: Spetzler-Martin Scale
Source: [44]
Type: other (classification)
Purpose: grading system for arteriovenous malformations
Content (template) and key (interpretation):
AVMs with 1-2 points have a low surgical risk, 3 points – intermediate, 4-5 points – high.
Anatomical form of AVM | Number of points | |
Maximum AVM size | less than 3 cm | 1 |
3–6 cm | 2 | |
greater than 6 cm | 3 | |
Presence of deep venous drainage* | none | 0 |
yes | 1 | |
AVM localization in an eloquent area** | none | 0 |
yes | 1 | |
Comment: * AVM drainage is considered deep if blood outflow through at least one of the veins occurs into the great vein of Galen, internal cerebral veins, basal veins of Rosenthal, and precentral cerebellar veins.
** Eloquent areas: sensorimotor, speech, and visual cortex, hypothalamus, thalamus, internal capsule, brainstem, cerebellar peduncles, and deep cerebellar nuclei.
Appendix G11. Spetzler-Ponce Scale (2011)
Russian name: Spetzler-Ponce scale
Original name: Spetzler-Ponce scale
Source: [45]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: stratification of patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations into surgical treatment risk classes
Content (template):
Class | Risk grade according to the S-M scale | Recommended management |
A | I, II | resection |
C | III | multimodal treatment |
C | IV, V | conservative management* |
Comment:
* exceptions include patients with recurrent hemorrhages, progressive neurological deficit, AVMs with the steal syndrome, and hemodynamic aneurysms
Appendix G12. Simplified SICH scale (2010)
Russian name: SICH scale
Original name: Secondary Intracerebral Hemorrhage Score
Source: [93]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: identification of patients with intracerebral hemorrhage at the highest risk of underlying vascular etiology
Content (template):
Parameter | Score | |
Probability of vascular anomaly on non-contrast CT* | high | 2 |
moderate | 1 | |
low | 0 | |
Patient age (years) | 18-45 | 2 |
46-70 | 1 | |
71 and older | 0 | |
Sex | female | 1 |
male | 0 | |
Arterial hypertension and coagulation disorders** | none | 1 |
present | 0 | |
Key (interpretation):
Recommendations for clinics that do not perform CTA in all patients with non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage:
SICH 0 – CTA and DSA are not indicated;
SICH 1-2 – CTA is performed, and DSA is performed only if vascular pathology is present or suspected;
SICH 3-6 – DSA is performed without CTA.
Recommendation for clinics where all patients with ICH undergo CTA:
SICH 0-2 – DSA is performed if vascular pathology is present or suspected on CTA;
SICH 3-6 – all patients undergo DSA regardless of pathology findings on CTA.
*High probability of vascular anomaly on non-contrast CT includes:
1) dilated vessels or calcifications along the edges of the ICH;
2) hyperdense foci in the venous sinuses or cortical veins along the suspected venous drainage pathway of the ICH;
Low risk of vascular anomaly on non-contrast CT includes:
1) absence of high-risk criteria for vascular anomaly (see above);
2) location of the ICH in the basal ganglia, thalamus, or brainstem.
Moderate risk of vascular anomaly on non-contrast CT is considered when high- and low-probability criteria for vascular anomaly are absent (in lobar and cerebellar ICH).
**Coagulation disorder criteria according to the SICH scale:
1) daily intake of acetylsalicylic acid** or clopidogrel**;
2) thrombocytopenia less than 50,000 per µL;
3) INR greater than 3.0;
4) activated partial thromboplastin time greater than 80 seconds.
Appendix G13. Lawton-Young Scale (2010)
Russian name: Lawton-Young scale
Original name: Grading Scale for Selecting Patients with Brain Arteriovenous Malformations for Surgery
Source: [47]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: selection of patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations for surgical intervention
Content (template):
Risk factors for AVM surgery | Score | |
Patient age | less than 20 years | 1 |
20-40 years old | 2 | |
greater than 40 years | 3 | |
History of hemorrhage | none | 1 |
yes | 0 | |
Diffuse AVM | none | 0 |
yes | 1 | |
Key (interpretation): in combination with the Spetzler-Martin classification, AVMs scored 2–6 points carry a low surgical risk, while 7–10 points indicate a high risk.
Combination of the Spetzler-Martin and Lawton-Young scales
Spetzler-Martin Scale | Points | Additional features | |
By size: | Age: | ||
less than 3 cm | 1 | less than 20 years | |
3–6 cm | 2 | 20-40 | |
greater than 6 cm | 3 | greater than 40 years | |
By localization: | Prior hemorrhage | ||
Outside the eloquent cortex * | 0 | No | |
Within the eloquent cortex | 1 | Yes | |
By venous drainage: | AVM margin: | ||
No deep drainage veins ** | 0 | Yes | |
Present | 1 | No |
Comment: * AVM drainage is considered deep if blood outflow through at least one of the veins occurs into the great vein of Galen, internal cerebral veins, basal veins of Rosenthal, and precentral cerebellar veins.
** Eloquent areas: sensorimotor, speech, and visual cortex, hypothalamus, thalamus, internal capsule, brainstem, cerebellar peduncles, and deep cerebellar nuclei.
Appendix G14. Virginia Radiosurgery AVM Scale (VRAS, 2013)
Russian title: VRAS Classification
Original title: Virginia radiosurgery AVM scale
Source: [51]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: prediction of outcomes following radiosurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations
Content (template):
Anatomical AVM form | Score | |
AVM volume in ml | less than 2 | 0 |
2-4 | 1 | |
more than 4 | 2 | |
AVM location in the eloquent area | none | 0 |
yes | 1 | |
History of hemorrhage | none | 0 |
yes | 1 | |
Key (interpretation): For AVM radiosurgery scored 0 points, an excellent outcome (complete AVM obliteration without neurological worsening) is predicted in 83%, 1 point — in 79%, 2 points — in 70%, 3 points — in 48%, 4 points — in 39%.
Appendix G15. Radiosurgery-Based AVM Score (RBAS), modified version (2008)
Russian title: RBAS scale, modified version (2008)
Original title: Radiosurgery-based AVM score
Source: [446]
Type: index
Purpose: prediction of radiosurgical treatment outcomes in patients with AVM
Content (template):
AVM score = (0.1) × (AVM volume in ml) + (0.02) × (patient age in years) + (0.5) × (malformation location *).
Comments:
* AVM location:
0 points — frontal and temporal lobes
1 point — parietal and occipital lobes, intraventricular location, corpus callosum, and cerebellum
2 points — basal ganglia, thalamus, brainstem.
Key (interpretation): for an AVM grading of 1 point or less, an excellent outcome (complete AVM obliteration without neurological worsening) is predicted in 95%, 1.25 points — in 80%, 1.5 points — in 70%, 1.75 points — in 60%, 2 points — in 50%, more than 2 points — in less than 40%.
Appendix G16. Scale for assessing the severity of PICS
Russian title: Scale for assessing the severity of post-intensive care syndrome
Original title: -
Source: [447]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: assessment of PICS severity
Content (template):
№ | Sign | Points |
1. | Pressure Ulcers | 0,5 |
2. | Respiratory tract infections / tracheostomy | 0,5 |
3. | Urinary tract infection / urinary catheter, suprapubic cystostomy | 0,5 |
4. | Pain / paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity | 1,0 |
5. | ICU-acquired dyssomnia | 0,5 |
6. | Nutritional deficiency | 0,5 |
7. | Underweight | 0,5 |
8. | Reduced gravitational gradient / orthostatic intolerance | 1,0 |
9. | ICU-acquired weakness | 0,5 |
10. | Critical illness polymyoneuropathy | 1,0 |
11. | Respiratory neuropathy / prolonged mechanical ventilation | 0,5 |
12. | ICU-acquired dysphagia / nasogastric tube, gastrostomy | 1,0 |
13. | Memory and orientation impairment | 0,5 |
14. | Delirium / agitation | 1,0 |
15. | Depressed mood | 0,5 |
TOTAL | 10,0 |
Note: severity grading of PICS is defined as:
1–3 points — mild
4–6 points — moderate
6–10 points — severe
Appendix G17. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale for assessing the severity of neurological deficit in stroke patients
Russian title: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
Original title: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS)
Source: [448]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: for assessing the severity of neurological deficit in stroke patients
Contents:
1a. Level of consciousness. The examiner must assign the appropriate score even if assessment is difficult due to endotracheal intubation, language barrier, orotracheal trauma, or bandages. Three points are assigned only if the patient has no motor response to a painful stimulus (except for reflex posturing). Ask the patient two or three general questions regarding the circumstances of their hospital admission. Based on the responses obtained, evaluate the results. Remember that the patient should not be assisted.
0 = alert, responsive immediately to examination.
1 = drowsy, responsive to minor stimulation.
2 = stuporous, requires repeated stimulation to respond, or unresponsive requiring more intense stimulation to elicit a non-stereotypic motor response.
3 = comatose, response only via reflex motor acts, spontaneous movements, or complete unresponsiveness, atonia, areflexia.
1b. Level of consciousness. Questions. Ask the patient: "What month is it? How old are you?" Close but incorrect answers are not scored. Patients with aphasia and/or decreased level of alertness who cannot answer the two questions correctly will receive 2 points. Patients who cannot speak due to endotracheal intubation, orotracheal trauma, severe dysarthria, language barrier, or other reasons (excluding aphasia) will receive 1 point. Only the first attempt is scored; verbal and non-verbal assistance from the physician is not permitted.
0 = correct answer to both questions.
1 = correct answer to one question.
2 = incorrect answer to both questions.
1c. Level of consciousness. Commands. The patient must be asked to close and open their eyes, make a fist with the non-paretic hand, and then release it. If the patient's hand cannot be used for this item, another command may be substituted. If the patient cannot understand the command, the task may be demonstrated to them. Patients with trauma, amputation, or other physical defects should be assessed using a single-step command. Only the first attempt is scored. Questions are also asked only once.
0 = both commands performed correctly.
1 = one command performed correctly.
2 = neither command performed correctly.
1. Eye movements. Only horizontal eye movements are evaluated. Spontaneous or reflexive (oculocephalic reflex) eye movements are assessed. Caloric testing is not permitted. If the patient has conjugate gaze deviation that the patient can overcome spontaneously or by eliciting the oculocephalic reflex, 1 point is assigned. If the patient has an isolated extraocular muscle paresis innervated by the III, IV, or VI cranial nerves, 1 point is assigned. Eye movements should be examined in all patients, including those with aphasia. Patients with ocular trauma, a bandage, prior blindness, or other visual acuity or visual field disorders must be examined by eliciting the oculocephalic reflex. To detect partial gaze paresis, it is recommended to establish eye contact with the patient and move from side to side relative to the patient.
0 = normal.
1 = partial gaze palsy, overcome voluntarily or by eliciting the oculocephalic reflex.
2 = forced deviation of the eyes not overcome by eliciting the oculocephalic reflex.
2. Visual fields. Visual fields (upper and lower quadrants) are tested separately. Finger counting or a sudden appearance of a visual stimulus (the examiner's finger) in the patient's visual field may be used if necessary. During testing, the patient should look into the examiner's face; however, if they track the movement of the fingers, this can be assessed as a normal positive reaction. In the presence of unilateral blindness or enucleation, visual fields are assessed in the healthy eye. If there is a clearly demarcated visual field defect in the form of upper or lower quadrantanopia, a score of 1 is given. If the patient is blind for any other reasons, a score of 3 is given. Simultaneous bilateral stimulation must also be performed. If this reveals a difference (visual field constriction towards the affected eye), a score of 1 is given, and the test results are used to answer question No. 11. Two points correspond to cases of complete hemianopia, and the presence of any partial visual field disturbance, including quadrantanopia, corresponds to 1 point.
0 = normal.
1 = partial hemianopia.
2 = complete hemianopia.
3 = bilateral hemianopia (blindness, including cortical blindness).
3. Facial palsy. Using verbal and non-verbal techniques, ask the patient to show their teeth, raise their eyebrows, close their eyes, and squeeze their eyes shut. Demonstration of these commands by the physician is permitted. Assess the symmetry of the pain grimace in response to a noxious stimulus in patients who cannot understand you. If there is a facial bandage, orotracheal intubation, or other barriers, they should be removed (as far as possible) for the duration of the assessment.
0 = normal.
1 = minor paralysis, facial asymmetry in the form of flattening of the nasolabial fold, asymmetry when smiling.
2 = partial paralysis (partial or complete paralysis of the lower facial muscles).
3 = complete paralysis of the lower and upper facial muscles on one or both sides (complete absence of movement in the upper and lower facial muscles).
5a. Upper limb movements (left arm). The patient's limbs must be positioned as follows: arms outstretched (palms down) at an angle of 90° (if the patient is sitting) or 45° (if the patient is supine). Each limb is assessed in turn, starting with the non-paretic arm. Demonstration of the maneuver by the physician is permitted in patients with aphasia. Administration of noxious stimuli is not permitted. In the event of limb amputation or shoulder joint pathology, the examiner must enter UN (untestable) in the appropriate box. Clearly count aloud to ten and demonstrate the count on your fingers so that the patient can see it. Start counting as soon as you let go of the patient's limb.
0 = limb holds the 90° or 45° position for 10 seconds without downward drift.
1 = limb drifts down before the full 10 seconds, but does not hit the bed or other support.
2 = limb cannot sustain the raised position (drifts down to the bed or other support within 10 seconds), but has some effort against gravity.
3 = limb falls to the bed with no effort against gravity, minimal movement is present.
4 = no active movement.
UN = limb amputation or shoulder joint injury.
5b. Upper limb movements (right arm).
6a. Lower limb movements (left leg). The limbs are placed in the appropriate position: at an angle of 30° in the supine position. Demonstration of the maneuver by the physician is permitted in patients with aphasia. Administration of noxious stimuli is not permitted. Each limb is assessed in turn, starting with the non-paretic leg. Only in the event of limb amputation or hip joint pathology, the examiner must enter UN (untestable) in the appropriate box. Clearly count aloud to five and demonstrate the count on your fingers so that the patient can see it. Start counting as soon as you let go of the patient's limb.
0 = leg holds the 30° position for 5 seconds without downward drift.
1 = leg drifts down before the full 5 seconds, but does not hit the bed or other support.
2 = leg cannot sustain the raised position (drifts down to the bed or other support within 5 seconds), but has some effort against gravity.
3 = leg falls to the bed with no effort against gravity, minimal movement is present.
4 = no active movement.
UN = limb amputation or hip joint injury.
6b. Lower limb movements (right leg).
4. Limb ataxia. Unilateral cerebellar signs are assessed. The test is performed with eyes open. If there is any visual defect, test in the unaffected visual field. Ataxia will be absent in a patient who does not understand what is required or is paralyzed. In the event of joint pathology or limb amputation, UN (untestable) is scored. Ask the patient to perform the finger-nose-finger, finger-finger, and heel-knee tests with both limbs. In case of blindness, the finger-finger test must be omitted. A patient with aphasia will often be able to perform the test normally if the examiner moves the limb beforehand.
0 = absent.
1 = present in one limb.
2 = present in two limbs.
5. Sensory loss. Only sensory loss due to the current illness is considered. The examiner should test as many areas of the patient's body as possible (face; arms, excluding hands; legs, excluding feet; trunk). Patients in a stupor and/or with aphasia are scored 1, and patients with brainstem stroke and bilateral sensory loss are scored 2. If the patient does not respond to external stimuli and has tetraplegia, a score of 2 is given, as well as for a level of consciousness reduced to coma.
0 = normal; no sensory loss.
1 = moderate sensory loss; the patient feels pinprick as less sharp or as dull on the affected side.
2 = severe to total sensory loss; the patient feels nothing (is not aware of being touched) in the face, arm, and leg.
6. Aphasia. The patient is asked to describe the attached picture, list the objects depicted on a sheet of paper, and read sentences from the attached list. If the patient is blind, they must name objects by taking them in their hand, repeat something after the examiner, or say something independently. An intubated patient should be asked to answer in writing. Three points should only be scored if the patient does not respond to any commands and does not answer questions. Mild aphasia is scored 1 point. To correctly choose between 1 and 2 points, use the provided materials; it is assumed that a patient who misses more than 2/3 of the items offered for this purpose or performs a small number of simple commands will receive 2 points. In a comatose state, a score of 3 is given.
0 = no aphasia; normal.
1 = mild to moderate aphasia.
2 = severe aphasia.
3 = mute, global aphasia.
7. Dysarthria. If the patient's condition is assessed as normal, they must be able to speak adequately in response to the examiner's request to read something or repeat words from the attached list. If the patient shows signs of severe aphasia, the clarity of articulation is assessed during spontaneous speech. Only if the patient is intubated or there is some other physical barrier to speech, the patient's condition is scored 9, and the examiner must provide a clear written explanation for the inability to assess the patient's condition. Do not tell the patient the reason for testing them.
Use the provided word list for all patients and do not inform them that you are performing a speech clarity test. As a rule, unclear pronunciation of one or more words is considered normal. Zero points are given to patients who read all words distinctly. Patients with aphasia or those who cannot read are evaluated based on the quality of their spontaneous speech or their repetition of words spoken aloud by the examiner. Two points are given when the patient is completely incomprehensible or remains mute.
0 = normal.
1 = mild to moderate dysarthria; the patient slurs at least some words and, at worst, can be understood with some difficulty.
2 = severe dysarthria; the patient's speech is so slurred as to be unintelligible in the absence of or out of proportion to any dysphasia, or is mute/anarthric.
UN = patient intubated or has other physical barrier to speech.
8. Extinction and inattention (formerly termed "neglect"). Information obtained during the previous tests is sufficient to detect neglect (inattention). If, due to a severe visual impairment, simultaneous bilateral visual stimulation cannot be performed in the patient, but the reaction to cutaneous stimuli is normal, their condition is assessed as normal. If the patient has aphasia, but by all indications attentively tracks the voice from both sides, their condition is assessed as normal. The presence of visuospatial neglect, or anosognosia, is regarded as pathological. Since pathology is scored only if present, this item is always tested.
It can be assumed that significant variation in examiner opinion is possible when assessing this item, as all neurologists use somewhat different methods for testing neglect. Therefore, to increase the reliability of the study, perform only bilateral simultaneous stimulation for visual and tactile stimuli. With unilateral neglect of stimuli in both modalities, assess inattention as 2, and with unilateral neglect of a stimulus in one modality, as 1. If the patient is conscious but demonstrates any other pronounced type of neglect, assess the level of inattention as 1.
0 = no abnormalities.
1 = depressed response (extinction, inattention) to simultaneous bilateral stimulation in one of the listed modalities (visual, tactile, auditory, spatial).
2 = marked unilateral extinction or extinction of stimuli in more than one modality; the patient does not recognize (fails to distinguish) their own hand or other landmarks on one side only.
Key (interpretation): maximum score is 42. Absence of neurological deficit corresponds to 0 points.
Notes: scale items are scored in order. It is unacceptable to instruct the patient, even if this contradicts routine clinical practice. The patient's first reaction is recorded. Only the patient's actual reaction is assessed, not their (in your opinion) possible actions. All symptoms present in the patient must be noted, including those that may have arisen as a result of previous strokes.
To examine speech output, the patient is asked to describe events in a picture, name objects, and read sentences and words presented by the evaluating physician.
Appendix G18. Canadian Neurological Scale
Russian title: Canadian Neurological Scale
Original title: Canadian Neurological Scale (CNS)
Source: [64]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: for assessing the severity of neurological deficit in stroke patients
Contents:
Cognitive functions | Score | ||
Level of consciousness | Alert | 3,0 | |
Stupor | 1,5 | ||
Orientation | Oriented | 1,0 | |
Disoriented/inappropriate | 0,0 | ||
Speech | Normal | 1,0 | |
Expressive deficit | 0,5 | ||
Receptive deficit | 0,0 | ||
TOTAL: _________ | |||
Section A1 | Motor functions | Fatigue | Score |
No comprehension deficit | Facial muscles | No | 0,5 |
Present | 0,0 | ||
Arm: proximal segments | No | 1,5 | |
Mild | 1,0 | ||
Moderate | 0,5 | ||
Total | 0 | ||
Arm: distal segments | No | 1,5 | |
Mild | 1,0 | ||
Moderate | 0,5 | ||
Total | 0 | ||
Leg: proximal segments | No | 1,5 | |
Mild | 1,0 | ||
Moderate | 0,5 | ||
Total | 0 | ||
Foot: distal parts | No | 1,5 | |
Mild | 1,0 | ||
Moderate | 0,5 | ||
Total | 0 | ||
Total: _________ | |||
Section A2 | Motor functions | Fatigue | Score |
Deficit of understanding | Facial muscles | Symmetrical | 0,5 |
Asymmetrical | 0,0 | ||
Hands | Equal | 1,5 | |
Unequal | 0,0 | ||
Legs | Equal | 1,5 | |
Unequal | 0,0 | ||
Total: _________ |
Appendix G19. Raymond-Roy classification
Russian name: Raymond-Roy Classification
Original name: Raymond–Roy Occlusion Classification
Source: [221,449]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: to assess the degree of aneurysm occlusion
Contents:
3 degrees of aneurysm occlusion:
Grade I – complete obliteration, Grade II – residual neck,
Grade III – aneurysm fills with contrast between the coil loops or contrast freely fills part of the aneurysm dome along the wall.
Notes:
Grade I is considered a good result,
Grade II – satisfactory,
Grade III – unsatisfactory.
Appendix G20. Swallowing screening test
Russian name: Screening swallowing test
Original name: -
Source: -
Type: -
Purpose: to assess swallowing function
Contents:
"___" ____________ 20___ Time _________ Patient's Full Name ____________ Medical Record No. _____________
SWALLOWING FUNCTION ASSESSMENT
Symptoms alarming for dysphagia
1 | Difficulty yawning | |||
2 | Poor oral hygiene | |||
3 | Drooling and inability to swallow saliva | |||
4 | Untidy eating behavior, food falling out of the mouth during meals | |||
5 | Slurred speech | |||
6 | Coughing or constant throat clearing before, during, or after meals | |||
7 | Changes in voice quality during or after swallowing ("gurgling" voice, hoarseness, temporary loss of voice) | |||
8 | Regurgitation | |||
9 | Shortness of breath, choking | |||
10 | Fever | |||
11 | Weight loss | |||
12 | Loss of interest in food, poor appetite, or food refusal | |||
13 | Increased sleep duration after meals | |||
14 | Sensation of food or liquid getting stuck in the throat while eating | |||
15 | Anxiety about eating in the patient |
PREPARATION FOR SWALLOWING ASSESSMENT
The patient is fully alert and actively responds when addressed □
The patient is in a sitting position (help sit up if necessary) □
The patient can independently control head position □
The patient can cough □
The patient can manage saliva (swallows on time, no drooling) □
The patient can breathe freely □
The voice is not wet or hoarse □

Appendix G21. Rehabilitation routing scale
Russian title: Rehabilitation Routing Scale (RRS)
Original title: - Rehabilitation Routing Scale 2025 [329]
Source: Union of Rehabilitologists of Russia
Type: rating scale
Purpose: to assess functional impairments and determine rehabilitation potential
Assessment Gradations | Status Description | |||
In central nervous system diseases or conditions | In musculoskeletal and peripheral nervous system diseases or conditions | In somatic diseases | ||
0 | No functional impairments | |||
Key sign: Premorbid level of activity and social life (work, education) | ||||
No complaints or signs of functional impairment | ||||
1 | No significant life activity impairments, despite existing disease symptoms; | |||
Key sign: premorbid level (work, education), activity, and social life despite existing disease symptoms | ||||
1) capable of returning to previous lifestyle (work, education, other); 2) spends the same amount of time on tasks as before the illness. | ||||
2 | Mild functional impairment | |||
Key sign: living at home alone for more than 1 week without outside assistance and supervision | ||||
Combination of clarifying signs 1: 1) capable of moving independently outside the home, going to the store, making short trips and journeys; 2) capable of independently performing all basic activities of daily living (dressing, undressing, using the toilet, eating); 3) requires outside assistance in performing one of the complex instrumental activities of daily living: cooking, housework, managing finances, etc. OR Clarifying sign: 4) unable to perform one of the complex social activities (driving a car, reading, writing, working, hobbies, and others) at the premorbid level. | Combination of clarifying signs 1: 1) can perform premorbidly available activities (driving a car, reading, writing, work, and others) without outside help, but with less confidence and a lower level of activity than before the illness; 2) can perform self-care independently (dresses and undresses himself/herself, goes to the store, cooks food, can make short trips and journeys, moves independently); 3) experiences minor difficulties related to one of the functional systems (arm activity, gait). | Combination of clarifying signs 1 1) normal physical exertion does not cause pronounced fatigue, weakness, shortness of breath, or palpitations; 2) angina pectoris develops with significant, accelerated, or particularly prolonged exertion (effort). OR Combination of clarifying signs 2 3) exercise tests: cycle ergometry or ergospirometry ≥125 W / 7 METs; 4) in the absence of exercise test data – six-minute walk test (6MWT) >425 m | ||
3 | Moderate impairment of daily functioning. | |||
Key sign: living at home independently for up to 1 week with periodic weekly visits by a second person | ||||
Combination of clarifying signs 1: 1) Capable of independent movement without outside help under visual supervision using assistive equipment (1-2 canes, walker) with stair climbing and going outside; 2) capable of independently performing all basic activities of daily living (dressing, undressing, using the toilet, eating, hygienic procedures); 3) requires outside assistance in performing more than one of the complex instrumental activities of daily living: cooking, housework, grocery shopping, managing finances, etc. OR Clarifying sign: 4) unable to perform more than one of the social activities (driving a car, reading, writing, work, hobbies, and others) at the premorbid level. | Combination of clarifying signs 1: 1) can walk independently using a cane; 2) minor limitation in self-care (dressing, undressing, using the toilet, eating), can call for help if needed; 3) requires external assistance with complex instrumental activities of daily living: cooking, house cleaning, grocery shopping, etc.; 4) requires assistance to manage financial transactions. OR Combination of clarifying signs 2 5) moderate pain syndrome during walking (4-5 points on the visual analogue scale (VAS)); 6) mildly pronounced pain syndrome at rest (1-3 points on the visual analogue scale for pain (VAS)); | Combination of clarifying signs 1: 1) can ambulate independently without outside help; 2) capable of independently performing all basic activities of daily living (dressing, undressing, using the toilet, eating, hygienic procedures); 3) requires outside assistance with complex activities of daily living: cooking, house cleaning, grocery shopping; 4) no pathological symptoms at rest; routine physical exertion causes weakness, fatigue, palpitations, and shortness of breath; 5) angina pectoris occurs when walking >500 m on flat terrain, or climbing >1 flight of standard stairs at an average pace under normal conditions. OR Combination of clarifying signs 2 6) exercise stress tests: cycle ergometry / ergospirometry = 75 - 100 W / 4 - 6.9 METs; 7) in the absence of ergometric test data, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) = 301 - 425 m | ||
4 | Severe impairment of daily functioning. | |||
Key feature: independent living at home with the ability to be left unattended and without assistance from a second person for 6 to 12 hours | ||||
Combination of clarifying signs 1: 1) verticalized to the level of sitting in a armchair for at least 6 hours a day with the ability to independently change position in the chair; 2) capable of walking with unilateral support and/or assistive equipment without climbing stairs / going outside. OR Combination of clarifying features 2: 3) requires periodic outside assistance with one or more basic activities of daily living: dressing, undressing, using the toilet, eating, hygienic procedures, etc.; 4) capable of communication at a level no lower than expressing needs; 5) capable of summoning help using assistive devices (telephone, computer). | Combination of clarifying signs 1 1) moderate limitation of mobility, unable to walk independently without an additional support device (crutches); 2) requires periodic assistance with one or more basic activities of daily living: dressing, undressing, using the toilet, eating, hygienic procedures, etc.; OR Combination of clarifying signs 2 3) pronounced pain syndrome during movement (6-8 points on the VAS); 4) moderately pronounced pain syndrome at rest (4-5 points on the VAS). | Combination of clarifying signs 1 1) moderate limitation of mobility; 2) requires periodic outside assistance with one or more basic activities of daily living: dressing, undressing, using the toilet, eating, hygienic procedures, etc.; 3) angina pectoris occurs when walking from 100 to 500 m on flat terrain, or climbing 1 flight of standard stairs at an average pace under normal conditions. OR Combination of clarifying signs 2 4) exercise stress tests: cycle ergometry / ergospirometry = 25 - 50 W / 2 - 3.9 METs; 5) in the absence of ergometric test data, 6MWT = 150 - 300 m | ||
5 | Profound impairment of daily functioning | |||
Key feature: round-the-clock dependency with the ability to be left unattended and without assistance for no more than 6 hours | ||||
Combination of clarifying signs 1: 1) verticalized to the level of sitting in an armchair for less than 6 hours a day due to the need for assistance in changing position in the chair; 2) requires bilateral support when walking indoors. OR Combination of clarifying features 2: 3) requires periodic attention from a second person and periodic assistance with all basic activities of daily living: dressing, undressing, using the toilet, hygienic procedures, eating, etc.; 4) capable of drawing attention using assistive devices (call button) and expressing needs using alternative communication methods (pictogram). OR Clarifying feature 3: 5) requires round-the-clock medical care due to tracheoesophageal dissociation (nasogastric tube, gastrostomy, tracheostomy), and/or pelvic dysfunctions. | Combination of clarifying signs 1 1) unable to walk independently without an additional support device (walker) or independent mobility in a wheelchair; unable to climb stairs, movement is limited to the apartment/inpatient unit; 2) requires periodic attention from a second person and periodic assistance with all basic activities of daily living: dressing, undressing, using the toilet, hygienic procedures, eating, etc. OR Clarifying feature 2: 3) pronounced pain syndrome at rest (8-10 points on the VAS), worsening with movement. | 1) unable to walk independently without outside help; 2) requires periodic attention from a second person and periodic assistance with all basic activities of daily living: dressing, undressing, using the toilet, hygienic procedures, eating, etc.; 3) the patient feels comfortable only at rest; minimal physical exertion leads to weakness, palpitations, shortness of breath, and cardiac pain; 4) 6MWT <150 m | ||
6 | Severe impairment of daily functioning (heavy degree) | |||
Key feature: need for correction of homeostasis disorders and ICU syndrome as a barrier to realizing rehabilitation potential, requiring a stay (up to 3 days) in the intensive care unit of a rehabilitation center Clarifying features (at least 2 features): 1) requires treatment for moderate-to-severe ICU syndrome (>3 points); 2) requires monitoring and correction of homeostasis (nutritional and fluid-electrolyte balance), including due to swallowing disorders with aspiration risk; 3) requires visual monitoring (including by ICU staff) and medical staff assistance 24 hours a day due to the inability to attract attention and express needs; 4) requires passive (robotic) mobilization: positioning, verticalization, passive movements due to profound motor deficit (less than 36 points on the MRC scale) and/or reduced gravitational gradient (<60°) under hardware monitoring; 5) requires restoration of tracheoesophageal continuity (nasogastric tube, gastrostomy, tracheostomy). | ||||
or Key feature: need for continuous stay in the medical rehabilitation department and/or the intensive care unit of a rehabilitation center Clarifying features (1 feature is sufficient): 6) status of prolonged or chronic disorders of consciousness; 7) requires round-the-clock monitoring and/or support of vital functions (respiration, circulation), including weaning from mechanical ventilation to full spontaneous breathing. | ||||