List of Abbreviations
ACR – American College of Rheumatology
ACR pedi – American College of Rheumatology Pediatric Criteria
ALT – Alanine aminotransferase
ANA – Antinuclear antibody
ANCA – Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies
AS – ankylosing spondylitis
AST – Aspartate aminotransferase
ACPA – Antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide
VAS – Visual Analog Scale
IBD – Inflammatory bowel disease
IVIG – Normal human immunoglobulin** (ATC code: J06BA – normal human immunoglobulins)
bDMARDs – Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (ATC codes: L04AB – tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors, L01XC – monoclonal antibodies, L04AC – interleukin inhibitors)
GCs – Glucocorticoids
GGT – Gamma-glutamyl transferase
HPS – Hemophagocytic syndrome
DNA – Deoxyribonucleic acid
GI – Gastrointestinal tract
IL – Interleukin
JAK inhibitor – Janus-associated kinase (JAK) inhibitor
CT – Computed tomography
CK – Creatine kinase
PT – Physiotherapy
LDH – Lactate dehydrogenase
PT – Physiotherapy
ICD – International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
MRI – Magnetic resonance imaging
NSAIDs – Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (ATC code M01A)
AKI – Acute kidney injury
ARI – Acute respiratory infection
PET – Positron emission tomography
RDS – Respiratory distress syndrome
RF – Rheumatoid factor
RP – Radiopharmaceutical (ATC code V09: Diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals, V10: Therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals)
ESR – Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
CRP – C-reactive protein
MPS – Mononuclear phagocyte system
sJIA – Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis
sJIA – Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (systemic-onset juvenile arthritis)
LoE – level of evidence
Ultrasound – Ultrasound examination
Grade of Recommendation (GoR) – level of recommendation persuasiveness
FC – Functional class
TNF – Tumor necrosis factor
CMV – Cytomegalovirus
ALP – alkaline phosphatase
EGD – Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
ECG – Electrocardiography
EchoCG – Echocardiography
JA – Juvenile arthritis
CINCA – Chronic infantile neurologic, cutaneous and articular syndrome
FCAS – Familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome
FMF – Familial Mediterranean fever
HLA-B27 – Human leukocyte antigen B27
Ig G, M, A – Immunoglobulin G, M, A
ILAR – International League of Associations for Rheumatology
MKD – Mevalonate kinase deficiency
MWS – Muckle-Wells syndrome
PAPA – PAPA syndrome (Pyogenic sterile arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, and acne)
Per os – By mouth, orally
Scl-70 – Non-histone chromosomal protein Scl-70, which is the enzyme topoisomerase I with a molecular weight of 70 kDa
Th – T helper lymphocytes
TRAPS – Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome
Clarification of notes
…** – medication included in the List of Vital and Essential Drugs for medical use
…# – "information on the method of administration, dose, and duration of use of the medicinal product, including references to clinical trials of the efficacy and safety of the applied dosing regimen for the given disease, or references to relevant literature sources if the recommendation thesis refers to a medicinal product used for medical application off-label (not in accordance with the indications for use, contraindications, methods of administration, and doses contained in the instructions for medical use)".
Terms and Definitions
Juvenile [Lat. Juvenīlis – young, youthful] – characteristic of youth; young, adolescent.
Idiopathic [idiopathicus; idio- + Greek pathos suffering, disease] – arising without apparent causes, characterized by unclear origin.
Interleukins (IL) – a group of cytokines that mediate the activation and interaction of immunocompetent cells in the immune response and regulate myelopoiesis and erythropoiesis.
Antinuclear factor (ANF) – autoantibodies directed against soluble components of the cell nucleus (ribonucleoproteins), forming a whole family (over 200 varieties) of antinuclear antibodies (ANA).
Rheumatoid factor (RF) – autoantibodies that react as an autoantigen with the subject's own immunoglobulins G modified under the influence of an agent (e.g., a virus)
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA, Eng. – ANCA) – autoantibodies to components of the neutrophil cytoplasm. Found in so-called ANCA-associated diseases, including ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP, synonyms – anti-CCP antibodies, anti-CCP) – a heterogeneous group of IgG autoantibodies that recognize antigenic determinants of filaggrin and other proteins containing the atypical amino acid citrulline.
Anti-Scl-70 antibodies – anti-scleroderma antibodies to the non-histone chromosomal protein Scl-70, which is the enzyme topoisomerase I with a molecular weight of 70 kDa, antibodies to topoisomerase I.
HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigens) – human leukocyte antigens, or the human tissue compatibility system – a group of histocompatibility antigens, the major histocompatibility complex in humans.
Class I major histocompatibility complex molecules (A, B, C) – present peptides from the cytoplasm on the cell surface (including viral peptides, if present). These peptides are fragments of proteins degraded in proteasomes. The peptide length averages about 9 amino acids. Foreign antigens attract killer T cells (also called CD8-positive or cytotoxic T cells), which destroy the antigen-bearing cell. Molecules of this class are present on the surface of all cell types except erythrocytes and trophoblast cells.
Class II major histocompatibility complex molecules (DP, DM, DOA, DOB, DQ, DR) – present antigens from the extracellular space to T lymphocytes. Some antigens stimulate the division of T helpers, which then stimulate B cells to produce antibodies against this antigen. Molecules of this class are located on the surface of antigen-presenting cells: dendritic cells, macrophages, B lymphocytes. Class III major histocompatibility complex molecules encode components of the complement system and blood proteins.
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) – a chronic inflammatory disease from the group of spondyloarthritides, characterized by obligatory involvement of the sacroiliac joints and/or spine with potential progression to ankylosis, with frequent involvement of entheses and peripheral joints in the pathological process
Uveitis – an inflammatory disease of the middle coat of the eye (uvea).
Anterior uveitis (iridocyclitis) is an inflammatory lesion of the anterior segments of the uveal tract.
Enthesitis is inflammation of the entheses, the specific sites where tendons and ligaments attach to bone.
Reiter's syndrome is a disease characterized by inflammatory lesions of the urogenital tract, joints, and eyes. Reiter's syndrome belongs to the group of reactive arthritides—non-suppurative "sterile" inflammatory diseases of the musculoskeletal system triggered by an extra-articular infection, primarily of the urogenital or intestinal tract.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (NSAIDs) (ATC code M01A) – a group of medicinal products possessing analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory effects. They are subdivided into selective (s-NSAIDs) and non-selective (ns-NSAIDs) inhibitors of the cyclooxygenase enzyme.
Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (ATC code L04AB – tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors, L01XC – monoclonal antibodies, L04AC – interleukin inhibitors) – a group of medicinal products of biological origin, including monoclonal antibodies (chimeric, humanized, fully human) and recombinant proteins (usually including the Fc fragment of human IgG) obtained using genetic engineering methods, characterized by a selective effect on specific mechanisms of chronic inflammation development, specifically suppressing the immunoinflammatory process and slowing down the progression of joint destruction.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Juvenile arthritis (syn.: juvenile arthritis (JA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA)) is an arthritis of unknown cause lasting more than 6 weeks, developing in children aged 16 years or younger with the exclusion of other joint pathologies [1].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Juvenile arthritis is a genetically determined, multifactorial disease.
Trigger factors for the development of JA include: Epstein-Barr virus, parvovirus B, rubella virus, hepatitis B virus, bacteria Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Campylobacter spp., S. pyogenes, B. henselae, M. pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, trauma, sun exposure, psychological trauma.
A risk factor for the development of the disease is maternal smoking during pregnancy, which increases the likelihood of immune imbalance during fetal development [2].
Juvenile arthritis is a disease with an immunoaggressive pathogenesis. A foreign antigen is engulfed and processed by antigen-presenting cells (dendritic cells, macrophages, B lymphocytes, etc.), which, in turn, present it (or information about it) to T lymphocytes. The interaction of the antigen-presenting cell with CD4+ lymphocytes stimulates their synthesis of corresponding cytokines. Interleukin 2 (IL-2), produced upon Th1 activation, interacts with specific IL-2 receptors, which causes clonal expansion of T lymphocytes and stimulates the growth of B lymphocytes. The latter leads to massive synthesis of immunoglobulin (Ig) G by plasma cells, increases the activity of natural killer (NK) cells, and activates macrophages. IL-4, synthesized by Th2 cells, causes the activation of the humoral immune response (manifested by increasing antibody synthesis), stimulation of eosinophils and mast cells, as well as the development of allergic reactions. Activated cells (macrophages, T and B lymphocytes, etc.) synthesize pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-17, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), etc. The hyperproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines underlies neoangiogenesis; damage to the synovial membrane of the joint, cartilage (and subsequently bone), as well as the development of systemic manifestations of the disease and the transformation of acute immune inflammation (characteristic of the early stage of juvenile arthritis) into chronic inflammation with the development of pannus and irreversible destruction of joint structures [1,2].
Juvenile ankylosing spondylitis is a specific form of JA, associated in 90% of patients with HLA-B27, which is encoded by the gene of the same name [4–6]. HLA-B27 encodes a class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule involved in antigen processing and presentation. It is hypothesized that HLA-B27 drives the pathogenesis of spondyloarthropathies through three mechanisms: (1) presentation of a yet unidentified arthritogenic peptide that triggers lymphocyte activation, (2) dimerization on the surface of antigen-presenting cells, causing CD4 lymphocyte activation, or (3) induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress leading to the secretion of IL-23 and IL-17 cytokines, which subsequently also activate T helper 17 (Th17) cells [4–6].
Innate immune cells play an important role in the pathogenesis of juvenile ankylosing spondylitis (JAS). In patients with spondyloarthritis, macrophages infiltrate the synovial membrane of affected joints, where they produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) [7]. Additionally, some patients with JAS exhibit clinically overt or subclinical inflammation of the intestinal mucosa due to the activation of gamma/delta T lymphocytes (γδ T cells) or type 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3), as well as Th17 cells, which produce IL-17 and IL-23 cytokines. The synovial fluid of patients with JAS shows a predominance of type 1 T helper cells [8].
Although the role of B lymphocytes is not obvious in the classical understanding of spondyloarthritis pathogenesis, some studies show that autoantibodies against CD74 (macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) receptor) may be present in the blood serum of patients with JAS [9]. Many current studies are investigating the role of gut microbiome alterations in the development of spondyloarthritis, as children with JAS exhibit decreased gut microbiome diversity and impaired tryptophan metabolism. However, attempts to normalize the gut microbiome using probiotics do not help reduce disease activity in children with JAS [10].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
Juvenile arthritis is one of the most frequent and disabling rheumatic diseases occurring in children. The incidence of JA ranges from 1.6 to 23 cases per 100,000 children under 16 years of age. The prevalence of JA in various countries ranges from 3.8 to 400 cases per 100,000 children [11–13].
Pauciarticular (oligoarticular) juvenile arthritis (JA) accounts for 50 to 80% of JIA cases in North America and Europe, 25% in Eastern India, 26% among the Native American population of North America, and 31% in other ethnic groups. The peak incidence occurs at 1-2 years of age. Some children develop the disease after the age of 2. However, in these cases, there is a high probability of developing other conditions—enthesitis-related arthritis, juvenile ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, or polyarthritis. In North America and Europe, oligoarthritis predominantly affects girls, with a female-to-male ratio of 3:1. In children with uveitis, the female-to-male ratio is higher, ranging from 5:1 to 6.6:1. In Asia, oligoarthritis is more common in boys, and uveitis develops rarely [1, 3, 11].
The incidence of seronegative polyarthritis is 1-4 per 100,000, and the prevalence is 21-37 per 100,000 children. Polyarthritis accounts for 20% of JIA cases. Seronegative polyarthritis can debut between the ages of 0 and 18 years. The first peak of incidence occurs at 1-3 years of age, and the second occurs during adolescence. Girls are affected 4 times more often than boys. The female-to-male ratio for early-onset disease is 3:1, and in adolescence, it is 10:1 [1, 3, 11].
In the European population, approximately 15% of patients with polyarthritis test positive for rheumatoid factor (RF). Seropositive JA accounts for approximately 3% of JIA cases. The frequency of seropositive polyarthritis ranges from 51% in Canadian First Nations children; 17% in Eastern India; 14% in African Americans; 12.5% in Japan; 0.2-0.5% in Europe; and 1% in the USA. The approximate incidence is 0.3-0.5 per 100,000 patient-years, and the prevalence is 0-6.7 per 100,000 children in Europe. The average age of onset is 9-11 years (range 1.5-15 years). Girls are significantly more affected than boys. The female-to-male ratio ranges from 4:1 to 13:1 [13].
Due to discrepancies in the definition and classification criteria of juvenile ankylosing spondylitis (JAS), data on the true prevalence of the disease are lacking. In studies conducted in the USA and Canada, the incidence rate of JAS ranges from 2.1 to 24.0 cases per 100,000 population. The relative frequency of JAS among children with JIA varies from 10% to 37.4% in different populations. From 30% to 50% of Mexican, Indian, and some Asian patients develop JAS before the age of 16 [14].
As of 2023, the prevalence of JA in children under 18 years of age in the Russian Federation reached 100.3 per 100,000 children, and the primary incidence was 21.2 per 100,000. Among adolescents, these figures were 168.6 per 100,000 children and 38.3 per 100,000 children, respectively; among children under 14 years of age, they were 87.2 per 100,000 children and 17.9 per 100,000 children.
Girls are more frequently affected. Mortality ranges between 0.5-1% [3].
Uveitis is primarily an adult disease; children account for approximately 5-10%. According to a study conducted in Finland, the overall incidence of uveitis in the pediatric population was 4.3 per 100,000 person-years, and the prevalence was 27.9 per 100,000. The combination of uveitis and JA occurs in 15-67% of patients. Uveitis may precede the development of arthritis in 3-7% of cases. Uveitis developing against the background of joint syndrome is detected in 11.6-30.0% of children, on average 1.8 years after the onset of articular syndrome. The maximum frequency of uveitis development is observed when JA debuts at the age of 1-2 years (47%); when arthritis manifests at the age of >7 years, uveitis develops in <10% of cases. Manifestation of JA-associated uveitis is possible at any age [15–17].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
In the ICD, juvenile arthritis is coded under the section "Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue (M00-M99)".
M08.0 – Juvenile (rheumatoid) arthritis (RF+).
M08.1 – Juvenile ankylosing spondylitis.
M08.3 – Juvenile (seronegative) polyarthritis.
M08.4 – Pauciarticular juvenile arthritis.
In accordance with ICD-10, the diagnosis is established as "Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis", or "Juvenile arthritis with active/inactive arthritis (oligo-/polyarthritis)", or "Juvenile ankylosing spondylitis". When formulating the diagnosis, the following data must be indicated:
— degree of disease activity (0-3) with/without therapy, absence/presence of functional impairment of varying severity (functional class [FC] 1–4);
— radiographic stage (1–4), absence/presence of disease progression; absence/presence of disease flares (number of flares per year);
— need for therapy adjustment, possibility of achieving remission only with immunosuppressive therapy using drugs from several (2 or more) pharmacotherapeutic groups (excluding nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]), including biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs);
— presence of disease complications, complications resulting from ongoing pharmacotherapy.
Examples of diagnoses:
Pauciarticular juvenile arthritis (M08.4) with mild joint function impairment; radiological stage I, no disease progression; with or without exacerbations (no more than 1 time per year), 0 or I degree of inflammatory activity during therapy; FC I; absence of adverse effects from ongoing drug therapy (NSAIDs).
Seronegative juvenile polyarthritis (M08.3) with moderate joint function impairment (FC II); radiological stage II; progressive disease course: exacerbations 2-4 times a year, persistent grade I or II inflammatory activity during immunosuppressive therapy; need for therapy adjustment, possibility of achieving remission only with immunosuppressive therapy using drugs from multiple (2 or more) pharmacotherapeutic groups (excluding NSAIDs), including bDMARDs; presence of complications from the disease and ongoing medical therapy.
Seronegative juvenile polyarthritis (M08.3) with severe impairment of statodynamic function due to joint involvement; radiological stage II or III, progressive disease course; frequent prolonged exacerbations (more than 4 times a year), FC II or III; persistent grade 2 or 3 inflammatory activity during immunosuppressive therapy; possibility of achieving remission only with immunosuppressive therapy using drugs from multiple (2 or more) pharmacotherapeutic groups (excluding NSAIDs), including bDMARDs; presence of complications from the disease and ongoing medical therapy.
Seropositive juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (M08.0) with severe impairment of statodynamic functions due to joint involvement; radiological stage III or IV; rapidly progressive disease course; grade 3 inflammatory activity; FC III or IV; low efficacy or resistance to ongoing immunosuppressive therapy with drugs from multiple pharmacotherapeutic groups (2 or more, including bDMARDs); presence of irreversible complications from the disease and ongoing medical therapy.
Juvenile ankylosing spondylitis (M08.1) with no or mild joint function impairment; radiological stage I, no disease progression; with or without exacerbations (no more than 1 time per year), 0 or I degree of inflammatory activity during therapy; FC I; absence of adverse effects from ongoing drug therapy (NSAIDs).
Juvenile ankylosing spondylitis (M08.1) with severe impairment of statodynamic function due to joint involvement; radiological stage II or III, progressive disease course; frequent prolonged exacerbations (more than 4 times a year), FC II or III; persistent grade 2 or 3 inflammatory activity during immunosuppressive therapy; possibility of achieving remission only with immunosuppressive therapy using drugs from multiple (2 or more) pharmacotherapeutic groups (excluding NSAIDs), including bDMARDs; presence of complications from the disease and ongoing medical therapy.
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
In addition to ICD-10 coding, the International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) has developed a classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), according to which the following categories of JIA without systemic features correspond to ICD-10 [18]:
Oligoarthritis – M08.4 – Pauciarticular juvenile arthritis.
persistent oligoarthritis
extended oligoarthritis
RF-negative polyarthritis – M08.3 – Juvenile (seronegative) polyarthritis.
RF-positive polyarthritis M08.0 – Juvenile (rheumatoid) arthritis (RF+).
Enthesitis-related arthritis – M08.1 – Juvenile ankylosing spondylitis.
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
The primary clinical manifestation of all variants of JA is arthritis.
M08.4 – Pauciarticular juvenile arthritis (oligoarticular JIA)
Definition. Arthritis involving 1-4 joints during the first 6 months of the disease [18].
There are 2 subcategories:
Oligoarticular persistent: arthritis involving 1-4 joints throughout the entire disease course.
Oligoarticular extended: involvement of 5 or more joints after 6 months of the disease.
Exclusion criteria:
1) psoriasis in the child or a first-degree relative;
2) arthritis associated with the HLA-B27 antigen in boys older than 6 years;
3) ankylosing spondylitis, enthesitis-related arthritis, sacroiliitis in the presence of inflammatory bowel disease, Reiter's syndrome, or anterior uveitis in first-degree relatives;
4) presence of rheumatoid factor in at least two tests within 3 months;
5) presence of systemic arthritis.
M08.3 – Juvenile (juvenile) polyarthritis (seronegative) (polyarticular JIA, RF-negative (seronegative)
Definition. Arthritis involving 5 or more joints during the first 6 months of the disease, with a negative RF test [18].
Exclusion criteria:
1) psoriasis in the child or a first-degree relative;
2) arthritis associated with HLA-B27 antigen in boys older than 6 years;
3) ankylosing spondylitis, enthesitis-related arthritis, sacroiliitis in the presence of inflammatory bowel disease, Reiter's syndrome, anterior uveitis in first-degree relatives;
4) presence of rheumatoid factor in at least two tests within 3 mo.;
5) presence of systemic arthritis.
M08.0 – Juvenile (juvenile) rheumatoid arthritis (RF+) (polyarticular JIA, RF-positive (seropositive)
Definition. Arthritis involving 5 or more joints during the first 6 months of the disease, associated with a positive RF in two tests within 3 months [18].
Exclusion criteria:
1) psoriasis in the child or first-degree relatives;
2) arthritis associated with HLA-B27 in boys older than 6 years;
3) ankylosing spondylitis, enthesitis-related arthritis, sacroiliitis in the presence of inflammatory bowel disease, Reiter's syndrome, anterior uveitis in first-degree relatives;
4) presence of systemic arthritis.
Polyarticular RF-positive variant is essentially identical to adult RF+ rheumatoid arthritis in its clinical phenotype, laboratory, and immunogenetic parameters. Both diseases can develop within the same family [1, 4].
M08.1 – Juvenile ankylosing spondylitis (enthesitis-related arthritis)
Definition. this is arthritis and enthesitis, or arthritis or enthesitis combined with at least 2 of the following features [18]:.
Exclusion criteria:
1) psoriasis in the child or a first-degree relative;
2) presence of systemic arthritis.
General manifestations. Fever is typically low-grade (subfebrile). In some cases, an acute onset may be observed, resembling the onset and course of systemic-onset juvenile arthritis with high fever, maculopapular rash, severe intoxication, arthralgia, and myalgia [1]. In most patients, periodic arthralgia, myalgia, and peripheral joint stiffness develop along with enthesitis, predominantly affecting the knee, ankle, and foot joints. Spinal involvement (spondylitis) and sacroiliac joint involvement (sacroiliitis) typically occur as the disease progresses [19, 20].
Peripheral arthritis. Peripheral arthritis in juvenile ankylosing spondylitis (JAS) is characterized by asymmetric involvement primarily of the large joints of the lower extremities—knees, hips, and ankles. Typically, asymmetric oligoarthritis develops, but polyarthritis involving the small joints of the feet, toes, and sternoclavicular joints can also occur [20, 21]. Unlike other JIA subtypes, hip involvement in JAS is relatively frequent [22], whereas small joint involvement of the hands is rare [1].
Enthesitis. Enthesitis is inflammation of the enthesis, which is the site of attachment of a ligament, tendon, or joint capsule to bone. It is characterized by pain and swelling, predominantly in the knee, foot, or heel region. The presence of enthesitis helps differentiate JAS from other JIA subtypes. However, entheseal tenderness can also occur in other rheumatic diseases, including other JIA subtypes, and even in healthy children [23]. In addition, Osgood-Schlatter disease and fibromyalgia should be excluded, as these conditions also present with similar symptoms [24].
Axial skeleton involvement. Involvement of the spine and sacroiliac joints is relatively rare at the onset of JAS, but may develop several years after disease onset [25]. Axial skeleton involvement is frequently asymptomatic [26–28], but may also manifest as pain, particularly in the lower back and buttocks, or stiffness and reduced spinal mobility. Prolonged periods of physical inactivity can exacerbate these symptoms. Physical examination may reveal tenderness upon palpation of the sacroiliac joints, pain upon flexion, abduction, and external rotation of the hip (Patrick's test or FABER test), and limited lumbar spine mobility in the sagittal plane during forward bending (Schober's test). Cervical spine involvement also occurs [29].
Uveitis associated with juvenile arthritis.
Uveitis most frequently develops in pauciarticular juvenile arthritis, seronegative polyarthritis, and juvenile ankylosing spondylitis. Uveitis in patients with poly- and pauciarticular arthritis is typically characterized by an asymptomatic, chronic course, with diagnosis often established only when the child experiences significant visual acuity loss. Uveitis developing in JAS is characterized by an acute course with lacrimation, photophobia, eye pain and redness, vision impairment, and headache.
Risk factors for the development of uveitis in JIA patients include: mono/oligoarthritis; age at onset of joint syndrome under 4 years (according to some data, up to 6 years); female sex (75–80%); circulating antinuclear antibodies (ANA) (detected in 66–92% of cases in JIA with uveitis, vs. 30–42% without uveitis); HLA phenotype (HLA-B27, HLA-DR5, HLA-DRB1*13); antihistone antibodies; elevated ESR [16, 17, 30, 31].
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Evaluation of patients with suspected juvenile arthritis
It is recommended to perform diagnostic procedures, including differential diagnosis, in a rheumatology inpatient setting for all patients with suspected JIA in order to confirm or exclude the diagnosis [1, 3, 32]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
It is recommended to analyze complaints in all patients to identify clinical manifestations of JIA [1, 3, 4]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: complaints in oligo- or polyarthritis include: morning stiffness or joint stiffness developing after periods of inactivity, lasting from several minutes to several hours; pain and/or swelling, and/or restricted joint movement, gait abnormalities; fever, typically up to subfebrile levels, weakness, fatigue, and rapid exhaustion [1, 4, 32]. In JAS, complaints include pain in the buttocks, groin, thighs, heels, around the shoulder joints, and less frequently (in approximately 24% of patients) pain, stiffness, or functional limitation in the lumbosacral spine or sacroiliac joints. Pain may resolve spontaneously, complicating early diagnosis. Axial skeleton involvement at disease onset is less frequent in children than in adults with AS: the onset of JAS may be gradual (sometimes acute) and characterized by intermittent muscle, joint, and ligament pain, stiffness, or inflammatory changes predominantly in peripheral joints. Arthritis is typically combined with enthesitis in one or more locations: most commonly in the knee or foot region. The disease may also debut with isolated hip joint involvement. Symptoms of spinal involvement are usually absent at onset in adolescents but may appear during the course of the disease [1, 3, 4].
Uveitis is characteristic of all JIA variants and may be acute, subacute, or chronic (indolent or relapsing). Chronic uveitis develops in approximately 15% of patients with RF- polyarthritis and 20% with oligoarthritis [1, 2, 6]; children typically have no complaints, and uveitis develops insidiously, being detected only when visual acuity decreases and pupillary deformation appears. In JAS, acute uveitis develops in the majority of cases, accompanied by eye irritation, ocular pain, decreased and/or blurred vision, floating spots before the eyes, eye redness, photophobia, and lacrimation.
Based on localization, uveitis can be anterior (iritis, anterior cyclitis, iridocyclitis) – inflammation of the iris and/or ciliary body; peripheral (posterior cyclitis) involving the ciliary body and the peripheral parts of the choroid; posterior (choroiditis, chorioretinitis) – inflammation of the choroid. In some cases, panuveitis may develop.
Depending on the number of affected eyes – unilateral and bilateral [1, 2, 6, 7, 11].
It is recommended to analyze the gynecological and obstetric history of the mothers of all patients with suspected JIA in order to identify factors predisposing to the development of the disease [1, 3, 4]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: screening for urogenital and other infections (chlamydial, mycoplasmal, cytomegalovirus, herpetic, Epstein-Barr virus, etc.) that may be triggers for juvenile arthritis (JA) in a child, before and during pregnancy. Data on the course of previous pregnancies. It is necessary to ascertain whether intrauterine fetal death, chronic habitual miscarriage, premature birth, primary or secondary infertility occurred. All these pathologies can be a consequence of intrauterine fetal infection, in particular viral and bacterial infection. Data on the course of the present pregnancy (harmful occupational or environmental factors the mother was exposed to during pregnancy, gestosis in the first and second halves of pregnancy, threatened miscarriage in early and late stages, anemia of pregnancy, diseases suffered during pregnancy). Data on the course of childbirth (timeliness of labor, duration of the water-free interval, duration of the first and second stages of labor, nature of the amniotic fluid, timeliness of placental separation and its quality).
It is recommended to analyze the life history of all patients to identify factors predisposing to the development of the disease [1,3,4,32,33]. (信頼性レベル 5, 推奨グレード C)
Comments: special attention should be paid to clinical manifestations of infections: conjunctivitis, omphalitis, balanitis, balanoposthitis, infected adhesions of the foreskin (in boys), cystitis, vulvovaginitis, vulvitis, asymptomatic leukocyturia, dysuric symptoms, cystitis (in girls), frequent otitis media, bronchitis, pneumonia, presence of herpetic eruptions on the face, frequent ARIs, intestinal infections. It is necessary to pay attention to the presence of allergic reactions, as well as reactions to vaccinations, presence of pets or birds in the household.
It is recommended to analyze the family history of all patients to identify factors predisposing to the development of the disease [1,3,4]. (UDD 5, UUR C)
Comments: it is necessary to determine whether the patient has first- or second-degree relatives suffering from the following diseases: rheumatoid arthritis, acute rheumatic fever, systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, scleroderma, etc., Reiter's disease, Bekhterev's disease (ankylosing spondylitis), Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriasis, uveitis.
It is recommended to analyze the history of the present illness in all patients to identify the characteristics of the pathological process [1,3,4]. (UDD 5, UUR C)
Comments: evaluate the nature of the onset (acute or subacute, with or without eye involvement). It is necessary to find out what preceded the development of the disease (trauma, acute respiratory infection, bacterial infection, vaccination, insolation, psychological trauma, urogenital or intestinal infection, conjunctivitis, bronchopulmonary infection, otitis media), whether the patient received antibacterial drugs and/or glucocorticoid hormones: which ones, what their dose and duration of administration were.
The onset of seronegative polyarthritis can be acute, but is more often subacute, with the gradual involvement of new joints in the process.
The onset of juvenile ankylosing spondylitis (JAS) can be acute or subacute, with or without involvement of the joints, spine, and eyes.
2.2 Physical Examination
It is recommended to perform general thermometry in all patients to assess the severity and nature of fever [1,3,4]. (UDD 5, UUR C)
Comments: An increase in body temperature is not typical for JA without systemic manifestations. However, fever may be observed in polyarticular JA, especially in seropositive JA and JAS. The temperature is usually subfebrile, rarely febrile.
It is recommended to evaluate the general condition of all patients for subsequent dynamic monitoring [1,3,32]. (UDD 5, UUR C)
Comments: the general condition is usually moderate, sometimes severe, and satisfactory during periods of remission. Patients often report morning stiffness, which can last for several hours; children cannot walk or take care of themselves. In patients with polyarthritis, an increase in pain syndrome in the joints and muscles may be observed at the peak of fever. When body temperature drops, well-being normalizes, and the child becomes active.
It is recommended to examine the skin of all patients to detect rashes and signs of vasculitis [1,3,4]. (UDD 5, UUR C)
Comments: rashes are not typical for JA without systemic manifestations. Rheumatoid nodules may be detected. They form most frequently in seropositive polyarthritis (in 30% of patients), and less frequently in RF-negative polyarthritis (in less than 1% of patients).
Nodules are usually localized distally to the olecranon and other bony prominences, in pressure areas. Rheumatoid nodules are mobile and painless upon palpation, but pressure may cause pain. Rheumatoid nodules are factors of unfavorable prognosis in patients with RF-positive polyarthritis. Sometimes nodules are the result of methotrexate** (MT) treatment. In this case, they are multiple, develop in a short time, are localized on the hands, and quickly disappear upon discontinuation of MT treatment.
Rheumatoid nodules must be differentiated from subcutaneous nodules in acute rheumatic fever, which are smaller in size and are not associated with chronic arthritis.
Cutaneous vasculitis is a very rare manifestation of JA without systemic manifestations and most commonly develops in older children with RF-positive polyarthritis.
It is recommended to inspect and palpate the lymph nodes in all patients to detect lymphadenopathy [1,3,4]. (UDD 5, UUR C)
Comments: lymphadenopathy is not typical for JA without systemic manifestations, but may be observed in RF-negative JA. Lymph nodes are generally mobile, painless, not fused to each other or to the underlying tissues, and have a soft-elastic or dense-elastic consistency.
It is recommended to analyze complaints, anamnesis, examination, percussion, palpation, and auscultation of the cardiovascular system in all patients to identify physical signs of heart and vascular damage [1,3,4,34,35]. (UDD 3, UUR C)
Comments: heart involvement develops extremely rarely in oligoarticular and RF-negative polyarthritis. In RF-positive polyarthritis, the aortic valve may be affected, though rarely. Aortic regurgitation develops, and acute heart failure is possible. As a rule, cardiac involvement manifests 4–17 years after the onset of RF-positive polyarthritis, but pathological heart murmurs may be auscultated as early as one year after the disease onset.
Cardiovascular system involvement in JAS is rare; the following develop: aortitis (involvement of the ascending aorta, predominantly its root); involvement of the aortic valve cusps with the development of its insufficiency; involvement of the membranous part of the interventricular septum with impaired atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction. Aortic regurgitation and conduction block develop in approximately 5% of patients on average 15 years after the disease onset. In rare cases, heart disease precedes the development of sacroiliitis. In case of aortic valve involvement, murmurs may be heard on auscultation.
It is recommended to analyze complaints, anamnesis, examination, percussion, and auscultation of the lungs in all patients to identify physical signs of pulmonary involvement [1,3,4,36]. (UDD 3, UUR B)
Comments: in some cases, the child may complain of a cough, difficulty breathing, or shortness of breath. Lung involvement in children with oligoarthritis and RF-negative polyarthritis is rare. In RF-positive polyarthritis, pulmonary involvement is also a rare manifestation, but can occur in two variants: lymphoid interstitial pneumonitis or bronchiolitis obliterans. Pulmonary involvement may develop in childhood, adolescence, or adulthood 10–20 years after the onset of JA. Visually upon patient examination, signs of pulmonary involvement may not be detected; in some cases, respiratory failure develops, manifested by shortness of breath, retraction of compliant areas of the chest, the epigastric region, and areas of diaphragmatic attachment to the costal margin, as well as cyanosis. Percussion sound may be normal, with a hyperresonant (box) shade; with dullness in the posterior-inferior lung regions; auscultation may reveal moist and crepitant rales of various calibers, pleural friction rub, and decreased breath sounds in the posterior-inferior lung regions.
In JAS, lung parenchyma involvement is observed rarely. Pulmonary apex fibrosis may be observed.
It is recommended to analyze complaints, history, examination, percussion, and palpation of the digestive system in all patients to identify physical signs of its damage [1,3,32]. (UDD 5, UUR C)
Comments: patients with juvenile arthritis (JA) frequently complain of epigastric pain and dyspeptic symptoms. Periumbilical pain may be associated with mesenteric lymphadenopathy. Physical examination may reveal weight loss, coated tongue, abdominal distension; abdominal percussion may show hepatomegaly and splenomegaly (hepatomegaly and splenomegaly in JA without systemic manifestations are rare, more commonly seen in RF-positive polyarthritis). Significant splenomegaly accompanied by neutropenia and infections is characteristic of Felty's syndrome, which develops very rarely in children. Progressive hepatomegaly is characteristic of secondary amyloidosis. Palpation may reveal epigastric tenderness at projection points of the gallbladder, duodenum, and pancreas, hepatomegaly and splenomegaly; in case of intestinal involvement, tenderness in the ileocecal region and along the colon.
Most children with JA develop upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract inflammation associated with NSAID use.
It is recommended to perform a joint examination in all patients to detect active arthritis [1,3,4]. (LE 5, GR C)
Comments: joints must be examined for swelling. Skin temperature over the joints should be assessed, followed by the temperature difference between symmetrical skin areas.
In RF-negative polyarthritis, the knees, wrists, ankles, and small joints of the hands and feet are most frequently affected both at disease onset and throughout its course. The 2nd and 3rd metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints are most commonly involved. Distal interphalangeal joints are rarely affected in children at disease onset. Temporomandibular joints are significantly more often affected in RF-negative polyarthritis than in RF-positive polyarthritis. A "bird-like" jaw develops. The cervical spine is rarely affected at the onset of RF-negative polyarthritis, but as the disease progresses, limitation of movement (extension) in the cervical spine is observed. In late stages, ankylosis of the apophyseal joints of the 2nd and 3rd vertebrae may develop. In the polyarticular RF-negative variant of JA, the number of affected joints is smaller, and the nature of the articular syndrome is more asymmetrical than in the seropositive variant of the disease; the wrists and small joints of the hands are less frequently affected; hip joints are involved at onset in 20% of patients; destructive changes progress in them as the disease progresses. In polyarticular RF-negative JA, growth impairment is more pronounced than in seropositive polyarthritis. In some patients with RF-negative polyarthritis, joint effusion and synovial hypertrophy are absent, while joint contractures progress in these patients, accompanied by elevated laboratory markers of inflammation. This type of polyarthritis is termed "dry synovitis".
In the polyarticular RF-positive variant of JA, large and small joints of the upper and lower extremities, the cervical spine, and the temporomandibular joints are affected. Symmetrical arthritis is typical, involving the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints, wrist joints, small joints of the feet, and proximal interphalangeal joints of the feet. Unlike RF-negative polyarthritis, micrognathia does not develop in the RF-positive variant when temporomandibular joints are affected due to later onset. Functional impairment and deformities develop very rapidly in the wrists: ulnar deviation of the wrist and metacarpophalangeal joints, boutonnière and swan-neck deformities in the fingers. Deformities in the lower limb joints also develop: hallus valgus (hallux valgus) – deformity of the first metatarsophalangeal joints, tuning-fork deformities, etc.
In oligoarthritis, the first 6 months of the disease are characterized by inflammatory changes in 4 or fewer joints. The child has no systemic manifestations, except for chronic uveitis. Lower extremity joints are predominantly affected – knees (in 89%), ankles (in 36%), small joints of the fingers and toes (in 6%). Elbow, hip, wrist, and temporomandibular joints are affected in 3% of patients. Monoarthritis with knee joint involvement develops in 50%. Joints in oligoarthritis are typically swollen, warm, but not very painful, and are never red.
In juvenile ankylosing spondylitis (JAS), the articular syndrome is typically asymmetrical. Peripheral joints are affected in 82% of patients, upper extremity joints in 16%, and distal joints are affected more often than proximal ones. Oligoarthritis develops in 75% of patients, and polyarthritis in 25%. Characteristic features include involvement of one or both knee joints, ankle joints, small joints of the feet and toes; development of tarsitis accompanied by pain, stiffness, and functional impairment; involvement of the 1st metatarsophalangeal joint with the formation of hallux valgus. Shoulders, temporomandibular, and sternoclavicular joints are frequently involved, hips are rarely involved, and small joints of the hands are extremely rarely involved. Pain in the sternoclavicular and acromioclavicular joints combined with clavicular pain may lead to impaired chest excursion.
It is recommended to perform an examination of the axial skeleton joints in all patients to detect spondylitis [1,3,4,26,29,32,37]. (LE 5, GR C)
Comments: in JAS, axial skeleton joints are involved in the late stages of the disease. In children with sacroiliitis, pain may occur with direct pressure on one or both sacroiliac joints, or on the pelvis. Swelling in the sacral region may also be detected.
Spinal involvement reveals flattening of the lumbar lordosis, increased thoracic kyphosis, an increased distance from the head to the wall during diagnostic tests, disappearance of physiological spinal curves, and rigidity in its various segments.
Involvement of the thoracic spine can lead to restricted chest excursion. In late stages of the disease, typically in adulthood, a "beggar's posture" develops.
Perform functional assessments including Tomayer, Ott, Schober, Zatsepin, Forestier tests, and the chin-to-chest test. Assess tenderness along the spinous processes of the spine and at paraspinal points.
Zatsepin's sign is tenderness upon pressure at the attachment site of the X–XII ribs to the vertebrae due to an inflammatory process in the costovertebral articulations.
Forestier's sign is assessed to determine posture type. The patient stands with their back to the wall, touching it with their heels, torso, and head. Normally, the heels, shoulder blades, and occiput should touch the wall. In patients with ankylosing spondylitis and Forestier's disease, contact at some point will be absent due to the development of kyphosis.
Determination of mobility in the cervical spine. Measure 8 cm upward from CVII and make a mark. Then ask the patient to bend their head down as far as possible and measure this distance again. In healthy individuals, it increases by 3 cm.
In case of cervical spine involvement, this distance increases insignificantly or does not change at all. In patients with ankylosing spondylitis and a short neck, the test is uninformative.
Chin-chest test: a healthy person easily touches the sternum with their chin. With cervical spine involvement, a distance remains between the chin and the sternum when the head is maximally flexed forward.
Ott's test is performed to determine mobility in the thoracic spine. Measure 30 cm downward from CVII and make a mark. Then the distance between the indicated points is measured again when the subject bends forward maximally. In healthy people, this distance increases by 4–5 cm, whereas in patients with ankylosing spondylitis, it remains practically unchanged.
Determination of restricted respiratory chest excursion to detect pathological processes in the costovertebral joints. Measurements are taken with a tape measure at the level of the 4th rib. Normally, the difference in chest circumference between maximum inspiration and expiration is 6–8 cm. With the development of costovertebral joint ankylosis, this difference decreases to 1–2 cm. In the presence of pulmonary emphysema, the test is uninformative.
Schober's test is performed to detect restricted mobility in the lumbar spine. Measure 10 cm upward from LV and make a mark. With maximal forward flexion in healthy individuals, this distance increases by 4–5 cm, whereas with lumbar spine involvement, it remains practically unchanged.
Schober's test is performed to assess overall spinal mobility. It is determined by measuring in centimeters the distance from the third (III) finger of outstretched hands to the floor during maximum forward bending. This distance is normally equal to "0" and increases when spinal flexion is limited.
It is recommended to determine the range of motion in all joints: determining the range of passive motion of a single joint in one plane, and determining the range of active motion of a single joint in one plane for all patients in order to identify functional insufficiency [1,3,4,26,29,32,37]. (LeD 5, GR C)
Comments: if joints are painless at a normal range of motion, it is necessary to assess for the onset of pain (protective muscle spasm, resistance) at the maximum range of motion.
Assess the range of motion:
— Cervical spine. Ask the patient to: throw the head back (normal extension is 50–60°), touch the chin to the sternum (normal flexion is 45°), turn the head to the right and left (normal rotation is 60–80°), and tilt the head toward the right and left shoulder (normal lateral flexion is 40°).
— Temporomandibular joints. Ask the patient to: open the mouth, protrude and retrude the mandible, and perform side-to-side lateral movements of the mandible.
— Shoulder joints. Ask the patient to: raise the arms sideways and up, reach the right and left ear over the back of the head, reach the right and left scapula with the opposite hand from behind, independently take off a shirt or t-shirt, and comb their hair.
— Elbow joints. Ask the patient to: place the hands on the shoulders (normal flexion angle is no more than 20°), extend the arm at the elbow joint (normal is at least 180°), and check pronation and supination (normal is 90°).
— Wrist joints. Check: dorsiflexion (normal is 70°), palmar flexion (normal is 90°).
— Small joints of the hands. Ask the patient to: gather the fingers into a fist (the fist should be tight), independently take off socks and tights, and button and unbutton clothes. Normally, the fingers easily touch the palm.
— Hip joints: check abduction (normal is at least 140°), adduction (the patient should touch the chest with thighs and knees), and external and internal rotation (normal is at least 40–45°).
— Internal rotation test in the hip joints. The child lies supine with the hips and knees flexed at a 90° angle. Keeping the knees together, the lower legs are rotated outward.
— In almost all hip joint diseases, internal rotation is the first to be affected.
— Knee joints. Ask the patient to: flex the legs at the knee joints (should be able to touch the buttocks with the heels), kneel and lower the buttocks onto the heels, extend the knee joints (normal angle is 180°), and squat.
— Check for the patellar tap (ballotment) sign.
— The lower extremities are flexed at the knee joints. Usually, the heels touch the buttocks without difficulty. The lower extremities are maximally extended at the knee joints while the child is in the supine position.
— Joints of the feet and ankles. Check: dorsiflexion (normal angle is 45°), plantar flexion (normal angle is 20°), supination (inward rotation of the foot – 30°), and pronation (normal outward rotation of the foot – 20°). Ask the patient to: stand on tiptoes and walk, and stand on heels and walk (normally the child should do this without difficulty). Observe for asymmetry when moving the ankles in different directions. Noticeable limitation of flexion is usually detected without difficulty, even in the absence of visible joint swelling.
It is recommended to evaluate gait in all patients to identify the nature of its impairment [1,3,4,26,29,32,37]. (LeD 5, GR C)
Comments: gait variants:
- with rapid transfer of body weight from the affected leg to the healthy one (involvement of knee, hip joints, and feet). The patient steps on the entire foot or toes (heel involvement),
- "waddling" gait (bilateral hip joint involvement).
Observation of gait during walking and running: limping in a patient is an important diagnostic clue for identifying pain or stiffness. Limping and gait abnormalities are most pronounced in children with JIA in the morning hours due to morning stiffness. When examining the patient in the afternoon, limping may be absent, and gait disturbance is minimal or not apparent.
It is recommended to perform an examination of the entheses in all patients to identify their involvement [1,3,4,26,29,32,37]. (LeD 5, GR C)
Comments: enthesitis (inflammatory changes at the sites of attachment of ligaments, tendons, and fascia to bones) is a pathognomonic sign of enthesitis-related arthritis, allowing for differential diagnosis with other variants of juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
Enthesitis is typical for enthesitis-related JIA and develops more frequently than in ankylosing spondylitis. It manifests as severe pain and marked functional insufficiency of the joints and is often the child's most serious complaint. On examination, pronounced local tenderness is determined in the area of the patella (at 10, 14, and 18 o'clock), the tibial tuberosity; at the attachment sites of the Achilles tendon and plantar aponeurosis to the calcaneal tuberosity; the plantar aponeurosis to the base of the fifth metatarsal bone; in the area of the metatarsal heads; greater trochanters of the femurs; anterior superior iliac spine; pubic symphysis; ischial tuberosity, and rarely in the upper extremities. Dactylitis may also develop.
It is recommended to perform an examination of the muscular system in all patients to identify the nature of its involvement [1,3,4,32]. (LeD 5, GR C)
Comments: JIA is characterized by weakness of the muscles around the affected joints, atrophy and shortening of muscles and tendons, which leads to the development of flexion contractures in the joints. RF-negative polyarthritis is characterized by the development of total amyotrophy, especially when the disease debuts under the age of 3 years. Nonspecific myositis may also develop in JIA, accompanied by muscle weakness, muscle edema, pain, and an increase in the blood concentration of muscle breakdown enzymes. In the presence of active arthritis, muscle atrophy develops proximally to the affected joint.
In juvenile enthesitis-related arthritis, a myopathic syndrome may develop, which manifests as decreased muscle strength, spontaneous and palpation pain in the muscles, and weakness.
It is recommended to rule out diseases that can present with similar clinical symptoms prior to prescribing antirheumatic therapy in all patients in order to perform differential diagnosis [1,3,4,37–41]. (LeD 4, GR C)
Comments: diseases that must be ruled out in the case of monoarthritis development: enthesitis-related arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, septic arthritis, oncological diseases, leukemia, neuroblastoma, hemophilia, trauma, familial Mediterranean fever and other periodic fevers; pigmented villonodular synovitis, sarcoidosis. Diseases that should be ruled out when diagnosing oligoarthritis, polyarthritis, and enthesitis-related JIA: acute rheumatic fever, reactive arthritis (following infections; yersiniosis, shigellosis, salmonellosis, chlamydiosis, toxoplasmosis, toxocariasis), septic arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease, systemic sclerosis, juvenile dermatomyositis, hemorrhagic vasculitis (Henoch-Schönlein purpura), chronic nonspecific ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, tuberculosis, Lyme disease (systemic tick-borne borreliosis), viral arthritis (herpes simplex, cytomegalovirus infection, hepatitis B and C), hypertrophic osteoarthropathy (Pierre Marie-Bamberger syndrome), hemophilia, leukemias, neoplastic processes, neuroblastoma, sarcoma, osteoid osteoma, benign and malignant tumors of joints and soft tissues, hypothyroidism, autoinflammatory syndromes.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
It is recommended to perform a complete (clinical) blood count with differential (including erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), red blood cell count, white blood cell count, platelet count, differential leukocyte count (leukocyte formula), and total hemoglobin level) in all patients to assess disease activity and detect pathological changes [1,3,4,42–45]. (LeD 5, GR C)
Comments: in oligoarthritis, peripheral blood parameters typically show no changes, though ESR may be elevated while hemoglobin level, leukocyte count, and platelet count remain within normal limits; in polyarthritis, a normal or moderately elevated leukocyte count with a neutrophilic left shift, elevated ESR, and rarely hypochromic anemia or thrombocytosis may be observed. The clinical blood count picture is not specific for juvenile arthritis; therefore, the differential diagnostic workup must continue. First and foremost, hemoblastoses, lymphoproliferative, and oncological diseases must be ruled out.
In enthesitis-related JIA, findings typically include a normal or moderately elevated leukocyte count with a neutrophilic left shift, elevated ESR (up to 100 mm/h, occasionally higher), rarely hypochromic anemia, and rarely thrombocytosis (>500×10⁹/L). The clinical blood count picture is not specific for enthesitis-related JIA; therefore, the differential diagnostic workup must continue.
It is recommended to determine prothrombin index, soluble fibrin monomer complexes (SFMC) in the blood, prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time, protein C level, protein S activity, plasminogen level, fibrinogen level, D-dimer concentration, von Willebrand factor activity and properties, and antithrombin III activity in patients with signs of vasculitis to assess the status of the hemostatic system [3,32,46–55]. (LeD 5, GR C)
Comments: juvenile arthritis is characterized by changes in the hemostatic system of a hypercoagulable nature.
It is recommended to perform thromboelastography in patients with signs of vasculitis to assess the severity of disorders in the hemostatic system [46,47,50,51,56–59]. (LeD 5, GR C)
It is recommended to determine the main blood groups by the AB0 system, subgroups and other minor blood groups A-1, A-2, D, Cc, E, Kell, Duffy, and to determine the D antigen of the Rhesus system (rhesus factor) in all patients before invasive procedures (esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy with biopsy, bone marrow aspiration cytology, bone marrow trephine biopsy imprint cytology, bone biopsy) in order to ensure the possibility of blood transfusion if indicated during or after the procedure [1,3,60–63]. (LeveL of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: Blood typing is performed for every patient when indicated for an invasive procedure.
It is recommended to test for total blood protein, blood albumin, total blood bilirubin, free and conjugated blood bilirubin, blood creatinine, blood urea, blood uric acid, blood glucose, blood ferritin, blood triglycerides, blood cholesterol, blood sodium, blood potassium, total blood calcium, blood lactate dehydrogenase activity, blood aspartate aminotransferase activity, blood alanine aminotransferase activity, blood gamma-glutamyltransferase activity, blood alkaline phosphatase activity, serum iron, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, cholesterol, blood creatine kinase activity, pancreatic amylase activity, and lipase activity in all patients to identify pathological changes and rule out other rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases [1,3,4,32,42,44,64–67]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: elevated levels of ferritin, triglycerides, ALT, AST, LDH, GGT, and hyponatremia may be observed in secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), as well as drug toxicity, oncological disease, hemoblastosis, lymphoproliferative disease, other rheumatic diseases, and sepsis, which warrants further differential diagnosis.
It is recommended to test for serum C-reactive protein in all patients to determine the severity of the inflammatory process [1,3,4,43,44,65,68,69]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: in most patients with oligoarticular juvenile arthritis (JA), serum CRP levels are within reference ranges, whereas in polyarthritis RF+, RF-, and juvenile ankylosing spondylitis, they are generally elevated.
It is recommended to determine anti-nuclear and anti-DNA antibodies; blood rheumatoid factor (RF); markers of ANCA-associated vasculitis: PR3 (c-ANCA), MPO (p-ANCA); blood anti-centromere antibodies; blood anti-RNA antibodies; anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies in the blood; antinuclear antibodies to Sm antigen in the blood; antibodies to RNA polymerase (Ro antigen) and RNA-associated protein (La antigen) in the blood; blood antiphospholipid antibodies; blood anticardiolipin antibodies; blood anti-beta-2-glycoprotein antibodies; blood anti-Scl-70 antibodies; and serum C3 and C4 complement fractions in all patients to rule out other rheumatic diseases, verify the diagnosis, and determine the immunological activity of JA [1,3,4,65,68,70,71]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: rheumatoid factor is significantly elevated in RF+ polyarthritis. High titers of IgM RF are typically detected, and IgA RF may also be present. Detection of IgA RF alone or combined with IgM RF is associated with high disease activity, marked functional impairment, joint space narrowing, and articular surface erosion. The frequency of anti-CCP detection is 57-90% in patients with RF+ polyarthritis and 17% in those with RF- polyarthritis. As in adults, anti-CCP is associated with the DR4 antigen and the development of erosions. Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are detected in 50% of patients with RF- polyarthritis, typically in low titers of 1:80 to 1:640. The presence of ANA in RF- polyarthritis is associated with early disease onset, more frequently in girls, the development of asymmetric arthritis, and a high risk of uveitis. In RF+ polyarthritis, ANA is detected in 80% of patients. In oligoarthritis, ANA is detected in 65-85% of patients, primarily in girls with uveitis. Complement levels are normal or elevated.
In juvenile ankylosing spondylitis, RF is negative. ANA is detected more frequently than in the general population of JA patients.
The levels of anti-nuclear and anti-DNA antibodies; ANCA, anti-centromere antibodies, anti-RNA antibodies; antinuclear antibodies to Sm antigen, and anti-Scl-70 antibodies are not elevated.
It is recommended to test blood immunoglobulin levels in all patients to assess immune status and rule out primary immunodeficiency [1,3,4,44,65,66]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: serum immunoglobulin levels in JA may be elevated in the presence of high autoantibody titers.
It is recommended to determine serum antistreptolysin-O in all patients to detect/rule out group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infection [1,3,4,44,65,72,73]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: an elevated serum antistreptolysin-O level indicates acute or chronic streptococcal infection and does not rule out the presence of JA.
It is recommended to determine HLA antigens (HLA-B27 antigen) in all patients to identify/rule out HLA-B27-associated diseases [1,3,4,65,74–76]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: the HLA-B27 antigen is detected in 90% of children with juvenile ankylosing spondylitis. Determination of HLA-B27 serves as a risk marker rather than a diagnostic test.
It is recommended to perform a battery of tests for the diagnosis of cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes and other autoinflammatory syndromes in patients with fever, rash, and uveitis, as well as in children with early onset and atypical disease course, to rule out autoinflammatory syndromes [1,77–82]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: mutations in genes responsible for familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome (FCAS), Muckle-Wells syndrome (MWS), and neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID/CINCA) are assessed.
It is recommended to test lymphocyte subsets in patients who frequently suffer from viral, purulent bacterial infections, including opportunistic infections, to rule out immunodeficiency states [83–85]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to perform a focal tuberculin test (Mantoux test, test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen in standard dilution**) and test blood interferon-gamma to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens in all patients to detect/rule out Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection [3,32,86–94]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to determine blood antibodies of classes A, M, G (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci; blood antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae; blood class G (IgG) antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis; and blood antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in all patients to rule out an infectious process that may present with clinical features similar to JA [1,3,32,81,95–99]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to determine blood antibodies to Salmonella enterica; blood antibodies to Salmonella typhi; blood antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis; and blood antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica serovars in all patients to rule out an infectious process that may present with a clinical picture similar to JA [1,3,32,95,96,100–108]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to determine blood antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Shigella boydii; blood antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Shigella dysenteriae; blood antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Shigella sonnei; and blood antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Shigella flexneri in all patients to identify/rule out an infectious process that may present with clinical features similar to JA [95,96]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to determine deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group ixodid tick-borne borreliosis agents in the blood by PCR; determine class M antibodies (IgM) to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group ixodid tick-borne borreliosis agents in the blood; determine class G antibodies (IgG) to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group ixodid tick-borne borreliosis agents in the blood, and determine total antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group ixodid tick-borne borreliosis agents in the blood in patients with an anamnestic history of visiting forests, living in areas endemic for tick habitation, or a tick bite, in order to rule out borreliosis [3, 32, 109–111]. (LEL 5, GOR C)
It is recommended to determine Epstein-Barr virus DNA in peripheral and cord blood by PCR (quantitative assay), Epstein-Barr virus DNA in oropharyngeal mucosal swabs by PCR (qualitative assay), and Epstein-Barr virus DNA in urine by PCR (qualitative assay) in patients with fever in order to detect/rule out diseases and active Epstein-Barr virus infection [1, 3, 32, 81, 112–118].
It is recommended to determine Cytomegalovirus DNA in peripheral and cord blood by PCR (quantitative assay), Cytomegalovirus DNA in oropharyngeal mucosal swabs by PCR (qualitative assay), and Cytomegalovirus DNA in urine by PCR (qualitative assay) in patients with fever in order to detect/rule out active cytomegalovirus infection [1, 3, 32, 115, 116, 119–122]. (LEL 4, GOR C)
It is recommended to determine Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in blood by PCR (quantitative assay), Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in oropharyngeal swabs by PCR (qualitative assay), and Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in urine by PCR (qualitative assay) in patients with clinical signs of active herpetic infection and/or fever in order to detect/rule out active herpetic infection [1, 3, 32, 115, 116, 119, 123]. (LEL 4, GOR C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Cytomegalovirus in the blood of patients with fever in order to detect/rule out active cytomegalovirus infection [1, 112, 115, 119, 121, 122, 124, 125]. (LEL 4, GOR C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of patients with fever in order to detect/rule out active Epstein-Barr virus infection [3, 32, 113, 115, 119, 126]. (LEL 4, GOR C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to the capsid antigen (VCA) of Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of patients with fever in order to detect/rule out Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases [3, 32, 113, 126]. (LEL 5, GOR C)
It is recommended to determine class G antibodies (IgG) to early antigens (EA) of Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of patients with fever in order to detect/rule out diseases and active Epstein-Barr virus infection [3, 32, 113, 126]. (LEL 5, GOR C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Herpes simplex virus in the blood of patients with clinical signs of herpetic infection and/or fever in order to detect/rule out active herpetic infection [1, 3, 32, 81, 115, 119, 127–130]. (LEL 5, GOR C)
It is recommended to perform molecular biological testing of blood for Toxoplasma gondii in patients with a history of animal contact in order to rule out toxoplasmosis [131–135]. (LEL 3, GOR B)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Leishmania in the blood of patients with a history of travel or residence in endemic areas in order to rule out leishmaniasis [136–140]. (LEL 3, GOR B)
It is recommended to perform molecular biological testing of blood for Hepatitis C virus and molecular biological testing of blood for Hepatitis B virus in patients with clinical and laboratory signs of hepatitis for differential diagnosis [3, 32, 141–145]. (LEL 5, GOR C)
Comments: juvenile arthritis may be complicated by autoimmune hepatitis or NSAID-induced hepatitis, and hepatitis can also be a sign of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis accompanied by cytolysis.
It is recommended to determine hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibodies to hepatitis C virus in the blood of patients with clinical and laboratory signs of hepatitis for differential diagnosis [3, 32, 141–145]. (LEL 5, GOR C)
Comments: juvenile arthritis may be complicated by autoimmune hepatitis or hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis accompanied by cytolysis.
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in the blood, and class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) in the blood of patients with clinical and laboratory signs of immunodeficiency in order to detect/rule out HIV infection [32, 146–149]. (LEL 5, GOR C)
It is recommended to test blood procalcitonin levels in patients with fever in order to rule out sepsis [3, 32, 150–153]. (LEL 3, GOR C)
Comments: blood procalcitonin levels are elevated during an acute inflammatory response. In juvenile arthritis without infectious complications, they remain within reference ranges.
It is recommended to perform blood culture for sterility, and urine microbiological (culture) testing for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic microorganisms in patients with fever in order to rule out sepsis and urinary tract infection [1, 3, 32, 81, 95, 150, 151, 154–156]. (LEL 4, GOR C)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) testing of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal wall mucus for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms in all patients in order to rule out nasopharyngeal contamination with pathogenic and opportunistic flora [1, 3, 32, 81, 150, 151, 157, 158]. (LEL 5, GOR C)
It is recommended to perform a routine urinalysis and urine microscopy according to Nechyporenko in all patients in order to rule out renal involvement [1, 3, 4, 65, 159]. (LEL 5, GOR C)
Comments: micro- and macrohematuria may result from the nephrotoxic effects of NSAIDs and methotrexate**; proteinuria may be a manifestation of renal amyloidosis. Microhematuria, macrohematuria, and proteinuria may manifest as acute kidney injury in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. In juvenile arthritis, urinalysis is typically normal.
It is recommended to test stool calprotectin levels in all patients in order to rule out inflammatory bowel disease [3, 32, 160–162]. (LEL 4, GOR C)
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive ultrasound examination (ultrasound) of internal organs (including comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and renal ultrasound) in all patients in order to detect pathological changes in the abdominal organs and kidneys, as well as lymphadenopathy [1, 3, 32]. (LEL 5, GOR C)
Comments: hepatosplenomegaly, changes in liver, spleen, and pancreatic parenchyma, cholestasis, altered renal parenchyma, decreased blood flow in acute kidney injury, and enlargement of mesenteric lymph nodes may be detected.
It is recommended to perform echocardiography in all patients to assess cardiac status [1, 3, 32, 34]. (LEL 4, GOR C)
Comments: in juvenile arthritis without systemic manifestations, cardiac abnormalities are generally not detected; in ankylosing spondyloarthritis associated with juvenile arthritis, typical features of aortic regurgitation or left ventricular systolic dysfunction may rarely be identified. Transesophageal echocardiography reveals aortic valve involvement in 82% of adult patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Nodular thickening of the aortic valve cusps may also be detected.
Performed for differential diagnosis with other rheumatic diseases. Myocarditis is characterized by left ventricular dilatation, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, hypokinesia of the posterior left ventricular wall and/or interventricular septum, aortitis, signs of relative mitral, aortic and/or tricuspid regurgitation, and increased pulmonary artery pressure. Pericarditis is characterized by separation of the pericardial layers and the presence of free fluid in the pericardial cavity. The endocardium and valve apparatus are generally unaffected in juvenile arthritis. In case of endocardial involvement, acute rheumatic fever and infective endocarditis must be ruled out.
It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram in all patients to assess cardiac function [1,3,32,34]. (UBD 5, GOR C)
Comments: in juvenile arthritis without systemic manifestations, there are typically no abnormalities. It is performed for differential diagnosis with other rheumatic diseases.
It is recommended to perform an ultrasound examination of the joint in all patients to assess the presence/severity of joint effusion, the condition of the synovial membrane, and cartilage [1,3,32,42,163–166]. (UBD 5, GOR C)
Comments: Ultrasound allows for dynamic monitoring and assessment of the degree of joint involvement. Ultrasound makes it possible to evaluate synovial thickening, joint effusion, tenosynovitis, enthesitis, and bone erosions. Synovial involvement is manifested by the presence of abnormally hypoechoic tissue associated with joint lines or surrounding tendons.
It is recommended to perform radiography of the temporomandibular joint and/or radiography of intervertebral joints, and/or radiography of the elbow joint, and/or radiography of the wrist joint, and/or radiography of the knee joint, and/or radiography of the shoulder joint, and/or radiography of the hip joint, and/or radiography of the ankle joint, and/or radiography of the acromioclavicular joint, and/or radiography of the sternoclavicular joint, and/or radiography of the hand and/or radiography of the foot in two projections, or computed tomography of the joint with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management), in all patients with joint involvement in order to detect destructive changes in the bone tissue of the joints, typical and atypical for juvenile arthritis [1,3,4,32,163,167]. (UBD 5, GOR C)
Comments: juvenile arthritis reveals: osteoporosis, destructive changes in bone structures, joint space narrowing, integrity of the articular surfaces of the bones forming the joint, presence of erosions, usurations of articular surfaces, cysts, areas of bone necrosis, subluxations, fractures, osteophytes, calcifications, etc. Simultaneous examination of symmetrical joints is necessary. Cartilage and bone tissue changes are detected in the majority of patients. It reveals osteoporosis, destructive changes in bone structures, joint space narrowing, integrity of the articular surfaces of the bones forming the joint, presence of erosions, usurations of articular surfaces, cysts, areas of bone necrosis, subluxations, fractures, osteophytes, calcifications, etc. Simultaneous examination of symmetrical joints is necessary. Cartilage and bone tissue changes are detected in the majority of patients.
In RF-negative polyarthritis, 2 years after disease onset, 30% of patients show joint space narrowing, 35% have erosions, and 10% have bone growth abnormalities. Early radiological changes develop in the wrist, hip, and shoulder joints. After 6.5 years, 39% of patients exhibit joint space narrowing, 64% have erosions, and 25% have bone growth abnormalities. Atlantoaxial subluxation also develops.
In RF-positive polyarthritis, joint space narrowing and articular surface erosions develop 1–2 years after disease onset, most frequently in the wrist joints, small joints of the hands, and shoulder joints. In the wrists, cartilage loss develops in the proximal carpal and intercarpal joints, leading to carpal ankylosis and hand shortening.
In oligoarthritis, joint space narrowing and articular surface erosions in the early stages of the disease develop in 5% and 10% of patients, respectively; in 15% and 25% after 6 years. Accelerated bone growth, predominantly of the knee joint, is observed in 20% of patients in the early stages of the disease.
In aggressive juvenile arthritis, ankylosis develops in the wrists and apophyseal joints of the cervical spine, along with avascular necrosis of the hip joints.
Early changes in peripheral joints in enthesitis-related arthritis correspond to those in other variants of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Radiological signs of enthesitis are more frequently detected in the region of the calcaneal tuberosity and less frequently in the knee joint. They are characterized by blurred contours and bone erosions at the Achilles tendon insertion site into the calcaneal tuberosity, and spur formation. Ankylosing tarsitis develops. As the disease progresses, significant joint space narrowing and ankylosis in peripheral joints may occur.
It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the joint with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients with mono-oligoarthritis and MRI changes atypical for juvenile arthritis, in order to rule out bone tuberculosis, osteomyelitis, benign and malignant tumors, and bone metastases [1,3,32,88,91,92,163,167–169]. (UBD 5, GOR C)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of joints (single joint) with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients with arthritis to rule out traumatic injuries to the tendon-ligament apparatus, menisci, and tumors, and to detect pannus growth, pathological changes in the synovial membrane, and cartilage in the early stages of juvenile arthritis [1,3,32,170]. (UBD 1, GOR A)
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging of the spine (single segment), computed tomography of the spine (single segment), or computed tomography of the pelvic bones with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients with complaints of back pain, presence of enthesopathies (according to physical examination), patients with positive HLA-B27, and suspected juvenile ankylosing spondylitis, to detect/exclude involvement of the spine and sacroiliac joints [1,3,24,32,45,171–178]. (UBD 5, GOR C)
Comments: in juvenile ankylosing spondylitis, radiological signs of sacroiliitis appear several years after the onset of peripheral arthritis and are the first signs of spinal involvement. The stages of sacroiliitis are presented in Table 1. Anatomical changes in the spine generally appear in adulthood, but with early disease onset and an aggressive course, spinal involvement may also develop in children.
Table 1. Radiological stages of sacroiliitis (J. Kallgren modified by K. Dale, 1979).
Stages | Features |
|---|---|
0 | Normal joint space width and distinct articular surfaces, possible minor sclerosis on the iliac side of the joints |
I | Changes suggesting sacroiliitis: presence of subchondral osteosclerosis, some irregularity and indistinctness of articular surfaces (possibly a normal variant) |
II | Clear early changes: pseudo-widening of the joint space and (or) localized areas with erosions; osteosclerosis is usually determined on both sides of the joint space; indistinctness of articular surfaces is often present |
IIa | Unilateral changes |
IIb | Bilateral changes |
III | Severe destructive changes: erosions and pseudo-widening of the joint space in at least one joint; small bone bridges are possible |
IV | Bilateral joint changes similar to those described in stage III, but with additional signs of joint space narrowing, often with bone bridges in one or both sacroiliac joints |
V | Terminal changes: pronounced signs of bony ankylosis in both sacroiliac joints |
It is recommended to perform ultrasound examination of the salivary glands in patients with positive RF and/or anti-CCP, and in patients suspected of developing Sjogren's syndrome, to rule out/confirm their involvement [1,179–182]. (UBD 5, GOR C)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the soft tissues of the head with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients with positive RF and/or anti-CCP, and in patients suspected of developing Sjogren's syndrome, to detect/rule out salivary gland involvement in Sjogren's syndrome [1,179–182]. (UBD 5, GOR C)
Comments: Sjögren's syndrome most commonly develops in patients with rheumatoid factor-positive juvenile arthritis.
It is recommended to perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients to rule out inflammatory, erosive, and ulcerative processes [3,32,160,161,183–185,185–191]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of gastric mucosal biopsies for *Helicobacter pylori* in patients with inflammatory and/or erosive and/or ulcerative changes according to esophagogastroduodenoscopy, in order to rule out GI pathology associated with *Helicobacter pylori* [3,32,160,161,184–188,190–193]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform endoscopic biopsy of the esophagus, endoscopic biopsy of the stomach, endoscopic biopsy of the duodenum, and endoscopic biopsy of the jejunum with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management), followed by pathomorphological examination of the biopsy (surgical) material of the esophagus, stomach, duodenum, and jejunum in patients with inflammatory, erosive, and/or ulcerative changes of the mucous membrane, in order to rule out inflammatory bowel diseases [3,32,160,161,186,194–197]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform colonoscopy with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients to rule out inflammatory bowel diseases [3,32,160,161,186,194–197]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform an endoscopic biopsy of the large intestine with pathomorphological examination of the biopsy (surgical) material of the large intestine in patients who show inflammatory, erosive, and/or ulcerative changes in the large intestine according to colonoscopy, in order to rule out inflammatory bowel diseases [3,32,160,161,186,194–197]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform video capsule endoscopy of the small intestine in patients with clinical signs of inflammatory bowel disease and/or elevated fecal calprotectin levels when esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy show no abnormalities, in order to rule out Crohn's disease with isolated small bowel involvement [3,32,160,161,184–188,198]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the chest organs with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients to rule out/detect pulmonary involvement, other rheumatic diseases, oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases, and tuberculosis [1,3,32,41,91,92,168,199–201]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced brain MRI, intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI, intravenous contrast-enhanced retroperitoneal MRI, and intravenous contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients with a severe general condition, fever, and inconsistency between the general condition and joint involvement, in order to detect/rule out oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases, tuberculosis, and abscesses [3,32,41,91,168,199,202,203]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 5, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform intravenous bolus contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdominal organs and intravenous bolus contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the retroperitoneal space with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients with contraindications to MRI, in order to rule out internal organ involvement in systemic juvenile arthritis, and to detect/rule out oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases, tuberculosis, and abscesses [1,3,32,168,204,205]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 5, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to obtain a bone marrow cytologic specimen via puncture and a bone marrow histologic specimen using anesthesia (including early postoperative management), with bone marrow smear cytologic examination (myelogram) and pathomorphological examination of the bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods, in patients with a severe general condition, fever, and inconsistency between the general condition and joint involvement, at the diagnostic stage prior to prescribing glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants and/or biologic agents, in order to detect/rule out oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases / metastatic bone marrow involvement, and macrophage activation syndrome [3,32,41,81,155,168,169,204–208]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: if glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants are used, the test is performed no earlier than 2 weeks after their discontinuation.
It is recommended to perform a lymph node biopsy (peripheral, or intra-abdominal / intrathoracic as indicated) with anesthesia (including early postoperative management), including cytologic examination of the lymph node tissue specimen and pathomorphological examination of the lymph node biopsy (surgical) material, in patients with marked enlargement of peripheral and/or intrathoracic and/or intra-abdominal lymph nodes, in order to detect/rule out hemoblastoses, lymphoproliferative diseases, and metastatic lymph node involvement [1,3,32,168,204–206]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: the study is performed at the stage of diagnosis establishment prior to prescribing glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants, and/or targeted biologic DMARDs. If glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants have been used, the study is performed no earlier than 2 weeks after their discontinuation.
It is recommended to perform positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)) with contrast enhancement, or if necessary, whole-body positron emission tomography with tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)) with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management), in patients with severe arthralgia, myalgia, ossalgia, destructive bone changes, subcutaneous fat infiltrates, and lesions in parenchymal organs, the brain, or spinal cord, in order to detect/rule out oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases [3,32,41,168,204–206,209,210]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 5, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform multi-position bone scintigraphy with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients with bone destruction foci atypical for juvenile arthritis, in order to detect/rule out malignant and benign bone tumors and bone metastases [168,169]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 5, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform CT-guided pelvic bone trephine biopsy with anesthesia (including early postoperative management), including pathomorphological examination of the bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods; cytologic examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; immunocytochemical examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; and immunophenotyping of hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow, in patients with a severe general condition, fever, and inconsistency between the general condition and joint involvement, for differential diagnosis during the workup prior to prescribing glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants and/or biologic agents, in order to rule out oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases / metastatic bone marrow involvement [3,32,169,204–207,210,211]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: in cases where GCs or immunosuppressants have been used, the procedure should be performed no earlier than 2 weeks after their discontinuation.
It is recommended to perform a bone biopsy with anesthesia (including early postoperative management) and pathomorphological examination of the bone tissue biopsy (surgical) material in patients with bone destruction foci atypical for juvenile arthritis, in order to detect/rule out malignant and benign tumors and bone metastases [3,32,168,169,204–208]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: destruction foci are characteristic of multifocal osteomyelitis, malignant neoplasms, and hemoblastoses, which can present with episodes of febrile fever accompanied by pain in the abdomen, chest, joints, and bones. Bone biopsy is required for differential diagnosis [169].
2.5 Other Procedures
2.1.5 Other diagnostic procedures
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by a pediatric oncologist for patients with suspected oncological or onco-hematological diseases based on examination results, in order to rule them out [3,32,41,169,199,204–207]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: performed based on the results of examinations (computed tomography of the chest cavity organs; magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal cavity, magnetic resonance imaging of the retroperitoneal space and pelvis with intravenous contrast enhancement; cytological examination of bone marrow smear (myelogram), pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods; cytological and immunocytochemical examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; immunophenotyping of hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow; cytological examination of lymph node tissue preparation and pathomorphological examination of lymph node biopsy (surgical) material; positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)) with contrast enhancement, whole-body positron emission tomography with tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)); bone scintigraphy; pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material (trephine biopsy) using immunohistochemical methods, bone biopsy with pathomorphological examination of biopsy (surgical) material).
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by a phthisiatrician for patients with a positive focal tuberculin test and/or intradermal test with a tuberculosis allergen, and/or an elevated blood level of interferon-gamma in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or infiltrative pulmonary lesions, in order to rule out tuberculosis [3,32,88,90–92,212,213]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by an orthopedic traumatologist for patients with space-occupying and destructive bone lesions, as well as bone deformities atypical for juvenile arthritis, in order to rule out septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, and other surgical pathologies [1,3,32,214]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by an otorhinolaryngologist for all patients in order to detect foci of chronic infection in ENT organs [1,3,32,95]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by an ophthalmologist with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy for all patients in order to detect visual system involvement [1,3,15,32]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: ocular biomicroscopy is mandatory.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by a pediatric dentist for all patients in order to assess the condition of the oral cavity [1,3,4,32,215]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by a neurologist for patients with neurological symptoms, severe pain syndrome, psychomotor developmental delay, or psychotic reactions, in order to rule out central and peripheral nervous system pathology, including malignant and benign neoplasms [1,3,4,32,216,217]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by an audiologist-otorhinolaryngologist and an audiogram for patients with suspected autoinflammatory syndromes in order to rule out/confirm hearing loss [1,3,32,77,82]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for patients scheduled for procedures under general anesthesia, in order to assess their condition [60,61,218–220]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for critically ill patients in order to address the issue of transfer to the intensive care unit [60,61,218–220]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to provide 24-hour monitoring by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for all critically ill patients (multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, macrophage activation syndrome) in order to provide care in the intensive care unit setting [60,61,218–220]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (testing, counseling) by a medical psychologist for all patients aged 1 year and older and their parents (regardless of the child's age) in order to harmonize the development of the child's personality in the context of a severe chronic disease and optimize parent-child relationships; to increase treatment adherence and cooperation with the physician and medical staff to achieve disease remission; to achieve psychological adaptation in society; and to develop an individual psychological rehabilitation program for the patient and their parents [32,221–227]. (Level of Evidence 1, Grade of Recommendation A)
2.1.6 Criteria for establishing the diagnosis of juvenile arthritis
The diagnosis of "juvenile arthritis" is established in the presence of arthritis in one or more joints lasting for more than 6 weeks [1].
Depending on the number of affected joints and the presence or absence of RF, the following forms of the disease are distinguished:
Oligoarticular subtype (oligoarthritis) – arthritis involving 1 to 4 joints during the first 6 months of the disease.
Polyarticular RF-negative subtype (polyarticular RF-) – arthritis involving 5 or more joints during the first 6 months of the disease, with a negative RF test.
Polyarticular RF-positive subtype (polyarticular RF+) – arthritis involving 5 or more joints during the first 6 months of the disease, associated with a positive RF test on two occasions at least 3 months apart or a positive test for antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (cyclic citrullinated peptide [CCP]).
Juvenile ankylosing spondylitis (syn.: enthesitis-related arthritis) – arthritis and enthesitis, or arthritis or enthesitis combined with at least 2 of the following features:
presence of tenderness of the sacroiliac joints and/or inflammatory back pain;
presence of HLA-B27;
onset of arthritis in a boy older than 6 years of age;
presence of ankylosing spondylitis, enthesitis-related arthritis, sacroiliitis associated with inflammatory bowel disease, reactive arthritis, or acute anterior uveitis in a first-degree relative (parents, siblings);
acute anterior uveitis.
The diagnosis of oligoarticular or polyarticular juvenile arthritis cannot be established in the presence of [18]:
- psoriasis (including a history thereof) in the patient or first-degree relatives (parents, siblings);
- arthritis associated with the class I major histocompatibility complex antigen B27 (HLA-B27) in boys older than 6 years of age;
- ankylosing spondylitis;
- enthesitis-related arthritis;
- sacroiliitis associated with inflammatory bowel disease;
- Reiter's syndrome;
- acute anterior uveitis;
- any of these diseases in a first-degree relative;
- presence of systemic arthritis.
The diagnosis of enthesitis-related arthritis cannot be established in the presence of [18]:
psoriasis (including a history thereof) in the patient or in a first-degree relative;
positive IgM RF in at least 2 tests taken at an interval of
- not less than 3 months;
systemic JIA in the patient.
Additional information for the diagnosis of juvenile ankylosing spondylitis and enthesitis-related arthritis:
Table 2. Rome diagnostic criteria for AS [228].
Clinical criteria |
1. Sacral pain > 3 months not relieved by rest 2. Chest pain and stiffness 3. Limitation of motion of the lumbar spine 4. Limitation of chest expansion 5. Iritis (current or historical) |
The diagnosis is established in the presence of bilateral sacroiliitis combined with one clinical criterion, or in the presence of 4 out of 5 criteria. |
Table 3. New York diagnostic criteria for AS [229].
Clinical criteria |
1. Limitation of motion of the lumbar spine in all 3 planes 2. History or presence of pain in the lumbar or thoracolumbar spine 3. Chest expansion limited to ≤ 2.5 cm at the level of the 4th intercostal space |
Definite AS: bilateral grade III–IV sacroiliitis on radiography combined with at least one clinical criterion, or unilateral grade III–IV sacroiliitis or bilateral grade II sacroiliitis on radiography combined with clinical criterion 1 or clinical criteria 2 and 3. |
Probable AS: bilateral grade III–IV sacroiliitis on radiography without clinical criteria. |
Table 4. Criteria for AS by the European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group [230].
Inflammatory spinal pain or Synovitis (asymmetrical or predominantly of the lower extremities) | Plus one of the following features:
|
Table 5. Amor AS criteria [231].
Features | Score |
Clinical or anamnestic | |
1. Nocturnal pain in the lumbar region or back and (or) morning stiffness in the lower back | 1 |
2. Asymmetric oligoarthritis | 2 |
3. Buttock pain, poorly defined, or intermittent buttock pain | 1 2 |
4. «Sausage-like» fingers and toes on hands and feet 2 | 2 |
5. Talalgia or other enthesopathies | 2 |
6. Iritis | 2 |
7. Episode of non-gonococcal urethritis or cervicitis less than 1 month before arthritis onset | 1 |
8. Episode of diarrhea less than 1 month before arthritis onset | 1 |
9. Presence of or history of psoriasis, and/or balanitis, and/or chronic enterocolitis | 2 |
Radiological | |
10. Sacroiliitis (bilateral: ≥grade II, unilateral: ≥grade III) | 3 |
Genetic | |
11. Presence of HLA-B27 and (or) family history of ankylosing spondylitis and (or) Reiter's syndrome and (or) psoriasis, and (or) uveitis, and (or) chronic enterocolitis | 2 |
Treatment response | |
12. Pain reduction within 48 hours of starting NSAIDs and (or) exacerbation within 48 hours after NSAID withdrawal | 2 |
The diagnosis is reliable with a score of ≥ 6 based on the 12 criteria. | |
Table 6. Garmisch-Partenkirchen JAS criteria.
Core metrics |
1. Asymmetric pauciarthritis (≤ 5 joints), predominantly of the lower extremities at disease onset (first 3 months) 2. Enthesopathies 3. Lumbosacral pain 4. Acute iridocyclitis |
Additional metrics |
Polyarthritis (> 5 joints) at disease onset Male sex Disease onset at age ≥ 6 years Presence of HLA-B27 Family aggregation of diseases from the seronegative spondyloarthropathy group |
Probable JAS is diagnosed in the presence of 2 major criteria or 1 or 2 major criteria combined with two minor criteria. Definite JAS corresponds to the same set of features combined with radiological confirmation of sacroiliitis (i.e., bilateral stage II or at least unilateral stage III sacroiliitis) |
Table 7. Criteria for AS in children [232,233].
Core metrics |
1. Presence of spondyloarthropathies or oligoarthritis in family history 2. Enthesopathy 3. Arthritis of interphalangeal joints 4. Sacroiliitis 5. Presence of HLA-B27 6. Recurrent arthritis or arthralgia |
Additional metrics |
Disease onset at age > 10 years Male sex Lower limb involvement only Acute iridocyclitis or conjunctivitis Hip joint arthritis Onset following unconfirmed enteritis |
A diagnosis of probable atypical spondyloarthritis can be established in the presence of 3 major and 2 minor criteria. |
In 2019, the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) proposed a new provisional classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, which outlines new diagnostic criteria for enthesitis-related/spondylitis-related arthritis (Table 8).
Table 8. Criteria for enthesitis-related/spondylitis-related arthritis according to the PRINTO classification [234].
Peripheral arthritis and enthesitis, or Arthritis or enthesitis plus inflammatory back pain ≥ 3 months and imaging-confirmed sacroiliitis, or Arthritis or enthesitis plus 2 of the following criteria:
|
2.2. Evaluation of patients with juvenile arthritis and suspected hemophagocytic syndrome
Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) is a JIA complication, a dangerous hyperinflammatory syndrome representing the terminal stage of a severe uncontrolled reaction characterized by hypercytokinemia with a significant yet ineffective immune response. It is a consequence of the innate or acquired inability of the immune system to cope with the triggering factor—most commonly an infectious agent [235,236].
Secondary HLH is triggered by viruses (cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, herpesviruses, etc.), medications (NSAIDs, gold preparations, sulfasalazine**, etc.). Secondary HLH results from the excessive activation and expansion of mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) cells and T lymphocytes, manifested by cytopenia, systemic inflammatory response, and liver and spleen damage. The cells comprising the MPS form a single differentiation lineage, including bone marrow progenitor cells as well as a pool of monocytes and macrophages. Overall, the MPS functions as a unique biological filter of blood and lymph, removing tumor and virus-infected cells, microorganisms, toxins, various metabolites, and circulating immune complexes. Histiocytes (syn.: macrophages) also perform antigen-presenting functions [235,236].
In JIA without systemic manifestations, sHLH develops significantly less frequently than in systemic JIA, but it can be triggered by a viral or bacterial infection.
sHLH is a consequence of the excessive activation and expansion of mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) cells and T lymphocytes, manifested by cytopenia, systemic inflammatory response, and liver and spleen damage. The cells comprising the MPS form a single differentiation lineage, including bone marrow progenitor cells as well as a pool of monocytes and macrophages. Overall, the MPS functions as a unique biological filter of blood and lymph, removing tumor and virus-infected cells, microorganisms, toxins, various metabolites, and circulating immune complexes. Histiocytes (syn.: macrophages) also perform antigen-presenting functions.
It is not always possible to establish a diagnosis of sHLH because its clinical and laboratory manifestations may resemble an infectious process [235,236].
2.2.1 Physical examination
It is recommended that diagnostic evaluations, including differential diagnosis, be performed in a rheumatology inpatient setting for all patients with suspected secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis to confirm or rule it out [1,3,32]. ( poziom wiarygodności danych — 5, poziom siły zaleceń — C)
It is recommended to evaluate the severity and pattern of fever in all patients to identify characteristics typical of HLH [1,3,32,235–238]. ( poziom wiarygodności danych — 5, poziom siły zaleceń — C)
Comments: fever (constant or non-remitting) is one of the main clinical symptoms of HPS. It is invariably resistant to anti-infective treatment. At the same time, normalization of body temperature as a result of immunosuppressive therapy serves as one of the signs supporting a diagnosis of HPS.
It is recommended to perform a general physical examination in all patients in order to develop diagnostic and treatment tactics [1,3,32,235–238]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: the course of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) varies from mild, with minimal symptoms, to severe. In severe uncontrolled sHLH, impaired consciousness and coma may develop, and a fatal outcome is possible.
It is recommended to perform a skin examination in all patients to detect pathological changes [1,3,32,235–238]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: pallor and jaundice of the skin indicate the development of anemia, progression of hepatitis, and coagulopathy; edema syndrome indicates the development of capillary leak syndrome and renal failure.
The frequency of skin manifestations in sHLH ranges from 6 to 65%. Skin lesions may present as a generalized maculopapular rash, erythroderma, edema, panniculitis, morbilliform rash, and purpura. Some manifestations are similar to those seen in Kawasaki disease.
Pathological and anatomical examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material reveals lymphohistiocytic infiltration of the dermis with phenomena of hemophagocytosis.
It is recommended to perform an examination of the lymph nodes in all patients to detect pathological changes [1,3,32,235–238]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: with the development of sHLH, lymph node size significantly increases, and generalized lymphadenopathy develops.
It is recommended to analyze complaints, medical history, and perform physical examination, percussion, and auscultation of the cardiovascular system in all patients to detect pathological changes in the heart and blood vessels [1,3,32,235–238]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: progressive sHPS leads to microangiopathy with thrombosis, which can be accompanied by arrhythmias and, in some cases, myocardial infarction. Acute heart failure is one of the consequences of small vessel thrombosis, microvascular dysfunction, or stress-induced cardiomyopathy.
Signs of cardiovascular complications in sHPS include pain in the heart region, behind the sternum, in the chest, epigastric pain radiating to the back, left shoulder, or neck, cough, shortness of breath worsening in a supine position, and progressive cyanosis.
Physical examination may reveal increased precordial pulsation, enlargement of the relative cardiac dullness boundaries, arrhythmias, and pathological murmurs over heart valve projection areas.
As sHLH progresses, heart failure generally develops.
It is recommended to analyze complaints, medical history, and perform physical examination, percussion, and auscultation of the lungs in all patients to detect pathological changes in the respiratory system [1,3,32,235–238]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: acute respiratory distress syndrome may develop in sHLH due to microangiopathy with pulmonary vascular thrombosis. Pulmonary involvement can vary in severity, up to the development of severe respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation.
Patient mortality in pulmonary involvement is up to 88%.
Increasing respiratory failure is an alarming sign indicating inadequate control over sHLH or the addition of a superinfection.
Examination may reveal dyspnea, cyanosis, patchy percussion sound, decreased breath sounds, crepitant rales, and moist rales of various calibers, predominantly fine-bubbling.
It is recommended to analyze complaints and perform physical examination, percussion, and palpation of the digestive system in all patients to detect pathological changes [1,3,32,235–238]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: upon examination, abdominal enlargement may be determined due to hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly, and/or the presence of fluid in the abdominal cavity. Percussion and palpation reveal enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, and tenderness upon palpation across the entire abdominal surface.
Liver involvement occurs in the vast majority of patients with sHLH, ranging from an asymptomatic course with blood test abnormalities to the development of hepatic encephalopathy, severe hypocoagulation, and edema-ascites syndrome. Spontaneous onset ofveno-occlusive disease has been described.
The degree of splenic enlargement varies from marked to moderate, with splenomegaly detected only during instrumental examinations.
2.2.2 Laboratory diagnostic tests
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (including erythrocyte sedimentation rate determination, red blood cell count, white blood cell count, platelet count, differential leukocyte count [leukocyte formula], and total hemoglobin level) in all patients to assess disease activity and identify pathological changes characteristic of sHLH [3,32,236–240]. (Credibility Level 4, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, erythropenia, and a decreased ESR develop in sHLH.
It is recommended to determine the prothrombin index, soluble fibrin monomer complexes (SFMC) in blood, prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time, protein C level, protein S activity, plasminogen level, von Willebrand factor activity and properties, fibrinogen level, D-dimer concentration, and antithrombin III activity in all patients to assess the hemostatic system [46,47,53–55,156,235–238,241–243]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: in sHLH, the levels of D-dimer and fibrin degradation products increase (an early preclinical sign), while the fibrinogen level decreases.
It is recommended to test the heparin level in the blood of all patients to assess the severity of hemostatic disorders and the risk of thrombosis/bleeding [1,3,32,46,50,56,56,244,245]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform thromboelastography in all patients to assess the severity of hemostatic disorders and the risk of thrombosis/bleeding/disseminated intravascular coagulation [50,56–59,246–248]. (Credibility Level 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to test total blood protein, blood albumin, total bilirubin, free and conjugated bilirubin, creatinine, urea, uric acid, blood glucose, ferritin, triglycerides, cholesterol, sodium, potassium, total calcium, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) activity, alkaline phosphatase activity, serum iron, creatine kinase activity, pancreatic amylase activity, and lipase activity in all patients to detect pathological changes characteristic of sHLH [3,32,235–238,240,249–251]. (Credibility Level 4, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: sHLH is characterized by elevated serum levels of ferritin, triglycerides, ALT, AST, LDH, as well as hyponatremia, hypochloremia, and hypoalbuminemia.
With the progression of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, hyperbilirubinemia, elevated creatinine, uric acid, and urea levels may be observed. Elevated creatinine, uric acid, and urea levels indicate the development of acute kidney injury associated with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH-AKI).
It is recommended to test C-reactive protein (CRP) in blood serum for all patients to assess sHLH activity [3,32,235–238,240,249–251]. (Credibility Level 4, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: serum CRP levels are significantly elevated in sHLH.
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) blood test for sterility, microbiological (culture) test of tonsil and posterior pharyngeal wall mucus for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, microbiological (culture) urine test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic microorganisms, and microbiological (culture) stool test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms with antimicrobial susceptibility testing in all patients to identify an active bacterial and/or fungal infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [1,237,238,249,252–255]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies of classes A, M, G (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci; antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis; antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae in the blood; and IgM and IgG antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the blood of all patients to detect/exclude active mycoplasma and/or chlamydial infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [1,3,32,81,237,238,253,253–255]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to detect Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected on chest computed tomography, in order to identify/exclude active mycoplasma infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [1,124,249,252,253,256–259]. (Credibility Level 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative Epstein-Barr virus DNA detection by PCR in peripheral and cord blood, qualitative Epstein-Barr virus DNA detection by PCR in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative Epstein-Barr virus DNA detection by PCR in urine in all patients to identify/exclude active herpesvirus infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [1,113–118,124,249,252,253,260,261]. (Credibility Level 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative Cytomegalovirus DNA detection by PCR in peripheral and cord blood, qualitative Cytomegalovirus DNA detection by PCR in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative Cytomegalovirus DNA detection by PCR in urine in all patients to identify/exclude active herpesvirus infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [1,115,116,119,121,122,124,125,237,238,249,252,253]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA detection by PCR in blood, qualitative Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA detection by PCR in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA detection by PCR in urine in all patients to identify/exclude active herpesvirus infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [1,3,32,115–117,123,124,249,252,253,262,263]. (Credibility Level 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Cytomegalovirus in the blood of all patients to detect/rule out active cytomegalovirus infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [1,32,124,125,237,238]. (LeveL of Evidence (LE) 5, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of all patients to detect/rule out active Epstein-Barr virus infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [112,113,121,237,238,252,253,264]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to the capsid antigen (VCA) of Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of all patients to detect/rule out active Epstein-Barr virus infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [112,113,121,237,238,252,253,264]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to determine class G antibodies (IgG) to early antigens (EA) of Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of all patients to detect/rule out active Epstein-Barr virus infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [112,113,121,237,238,252,253,264]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Herpes simplex virus in the blood of all patients to detect/rule out active herpetic infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [32,123,130,237,238,251,252,265]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms using automated seeding with determination of microorganism susceptibility to antimicrobial chemotherapeutic agents when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography to identify the etiological factor of lung lesion [237,238,266,267]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to determine Epstein-Barr virus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/rule out active Epstein-Barr virus infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [237,238,266–269]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to determine Cytomegalovirus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/rule out active cytomegalovirus infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [237,238,266–269]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative determination of Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in sputum, endotracheal aspirate, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/rule out active pneumocystis infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [119,238,252,270–276]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies to Pneumocystis jirovecii in the blood when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/rule out active pneumocystis infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [238,249,252,272,277,278]. (LE 5, GR C)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis carinii cysts when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/rule out active pneumocystis infection as a triggering factor for sHLH [112,237,238,252,270–273,275,276,279,280]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeasts and molds) when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/rule out mycosis as a triggering factor for sHLH [237,252,266,267,270,281,282]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to determine mannan antigen of Candida albicans and galactomannan antigen of Aspergillus spp. in blood serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/rule out aspergillosis as a triggering factor for sHLH [252,266,267,270,281,282]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to determine mannan antigen of Candida albicans and galactomannan antigen of Aspergillus spp. in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/rule out aspergillosis as a triggering factor for sHLH [252,266,267,270,281,282]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to measure blood procalcitonin levels in all patients to rule out sepsis [150,150,153,156,237,238]. (LE 3, GR C)
Comments: an elevated procalcitonin level should raise suspicion of a superimposed infection and the development of sepsis.
It is recommended to perform a general (clinical) urinalysis, determine urinary albumin, and measure 24-hour urinary protein in all patients to detect/rule out kidney damage [3,32,236–240,283]. (LE 5, GR C)
Comments: tubular necrosis – the predominant form of renal injury in acute kidney injury associated with sHLH (sHLH-AKI). However, histopathological changes may also include interstitial inflammation, glomerular abnormalities, microscopic lesions, and thrombotic microangiopathy. Patients with sHLH-AKI typically present with oliguria, azotemia, and nephrotic syndrome. Urinalysis reveals varying degrees of proteinuria, macro- and microhematuria, and casts.
2.2.3 Instrumental diagnostic tests
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive ultrasound examination (ultrasound) of internal organs (including a comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and renal ultrasound) in all patients to detect kidney damage, hepatosplenomegaly, and intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy [1,3,32,237,238,284,285]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to perform echocardiography in all patients to assess cardiac status [1,3,32,235–238,240]. (LE 4, GR C)
It is recommended to perform electrocardiography in all patients to evaluate cardiac function [1,3,32,235–238,286]. (LE 5, GR C)
It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the chest with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in all patients to detect/rule out lung involvement [1,3,32,235–238,284]. (LE 4, GR C)
Comments: MAS may be complicated by hemorrhagic alveolitis, alveolar and interstitial pulmonary edema of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) type; pneumonia (focal, lobar, interstitial, polysegmental) may also be detected.
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients with neurological symptoms to detect brain involvement [1,3,32,235–238,284,287]. (LE 4, GR C)
Comments: sHLH may manifest with ischemic/hemorrhagic strokes, well-defined demyelinating lesions, and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES).
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal cavity, retroperitoneal space, and pelvic organs with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in the event of multiple organ dysfunction in all patients to detect organomegaly, abdominal lesions, intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy, renal involvement, and free fluid in the abdominal and pelvic cavities [1,3,32,235–238,288]. (LE 5, GR C)
It is recommended to obtain a bone marrow cytologic specimen via puncture with anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) and a bone marrow histologic specimen, accompanied by cytologic examination of the bone marrow smear (myelogram) and pathomorphological examination of the bone marrow biopsy (surgical) specimen in all patients to identify differentiated macrophages phagocytosing hematopoietic cells [1,3,32,235–238,289,290]. (LE 4, GR C)
Comments: in severe sHMA, bone marrow aplasia may develop.
2.2.4 Other diagnostic procedures
It is recommended to perform an initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a neurologist for patients with neurological symptoms in order to assess the state of the central and peripheral nervous system [1,3,32,235–238]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: 30–35% of patients develop symptoms of central nervous system involvement; seizures, meningism, depressed level of consciousness, cranial nerve palsy, psychomotor agitation, ataxia, hypotonia, irritability.
In half of the patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms, cerebrospinal fluid analysis reveals pleocytosis, hyperproteinorachia (elevated CSF protein), and hemophagocytic cells.
Peripheral neuropathy and marked generalized weakness, disproportionate to the degree of anemia, are also encountered.
It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for patients scheduled for procedures under general anesthesia, in order to assess their condition [60,61,218–220]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: prior to all procedures requiring anesthesia/sedation, an examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-reanimatologist is required.
It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for patients in serious/critical condition in order to decide on transfer to the intensive care unit [60,61,218–220]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform 24-hour monitoring by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for patients with pancytopenia, single-organ or multiple-organ failure, or CNS involvement in order to provide care in an intensive care unit setting [60,61,218–220]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform an initial appointment (examination, consultation) by an ophthalmologist for patients with hemorrhagic syndrome in order to assess the state of the media and membranes of the eye, optic nerve, retina, and fundus [1,3,32,235–238,291–293]. (Credibility Level 4, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: patients with MAS may exhibit retinal hemorrhages, optic neuritis, and uveal infiltration.
2.2.5 Criteria for diagnosing "Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis".
A. Ravelli et al. criteria[236]:
Serum ferritin concentration >684 ng/ml combined with a febrile fever and 2 of the following:
- blood platelet count ≤180×109/L;
- serum AST concentration >48 IU/L;
- serum triglyceride concentration >1.75 mmol/L;
- blood fibrinogen concentration ≤3.60 g/L.
2.2.6. Personalized diagnostic algorithm for secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in patients with juvenile arthritis
All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of juvenile arthritis in the presence of febrile fever require [294]:
Assessment of clinical parameters:
- fever, rash, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, myalgia, hemorrhagic syndrome, central nervous system involvement (seizures, paresthesia, confusion, cranial or peripheral neuropathy), renal, pulmonary, and cardiac involvement.
Assessment of laboratory test results:
- hemoglobin level, absolute count of red blood cells, white blood cells, neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets, ESR, ALT, AST, GGT, LDH activity, concentration of creatinine, urea, CRP, ferritin, triglycerides, PCT, total protein and serum albumin, blood electrolyte composition (sodium, potassium, chlorides, iron), glomerular filtration rate (with increasing azotemia), blood clotting capability (Quick's prothrombin, thrombin time, prothrombin time, INR, aPTT, D-dimer, fibrinogen, fibrin monomer, von Willebrand factor, protein S, protein C);
Assessment of imaging and diagnostic test results:
- Instrumental:
- ECG, echocardiography, ultrasound of the abdominal organs, kidneys (comprehensive), chest CT, abdominal MRI, brain MRI; microbiological: blood for sterility, urine, swabs from the tonsils and the posterior pharyngeal wall, feces for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic microorganisms with determination of microorganism susceptibility to antimicrobial chemotherapeutic agents;
- molecular biological: screening for viruses of the Herpesviridae family (cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2) (list of included tests – see corresponding section)
After analyzing the above-described clinical data and test results, it is necessary to verify the diagnosis of sHLH according to the criteria of A. Ravelli et al. from 2016 (see section 2.3) and initiate immunosuppressive therapy in accordance with the treatment algorithm for juvenile arthritis with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (see section 3.1.2).
Monitoring of early markers of sHLH development [294]:
All patients with juvenile arthritis need monitoring of early markers of sHLH development:
Early clinical markers of secondary HPS:
- Lymphadenopathy
Early instrumental markers of secondary HPS:
- Decreased blood red blood cell count <4.34 million/µl
- Decrease in blood platelet count <208 thousand/µL
- Decreased blood chloride concentration <101.9 mmol/l
- Increase in serum LDH activity >412 IU/L
If early markers of MAS development are identified, immunosuppressive therapy must be initiated in accordance with the treatment algorithm for systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis with hemophagocytic syndrome (see section 3.1.2).
2.3. Examination of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of juvenile arthritis in the active disease stage for the purpose of prescribing/adjusting therapy
It is recommended to perform an examination in a rheumatology inpatient unit for all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of juvenile arthritis, active stage, for the purpose of prescribing/adjusting therapy [1,3,32]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Complaints and anamnesis (see section 2.1)
Physical examination (see section 2.2)
2.3.1 Laboratory diagnostic tests
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (erythrocyte sedimentation rate determination, blood erythrocyte level determination, blood leukocyte level determination, blood platelet level determination, differential leukocyte count (leukocyte formula), total blood hemoglobin level determination) for all patients before prescribing/adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to determine disease activity and adverse effects of NSAIDs and/or immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs [1,3,4,32,42,45]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: in the majority of patients with oligoarthritis, complete blood count parameters are generally within reference ranges; in some cases, an increase in ESR is noted. In patients with polyarthritis or juvenile ankylosing spondylitis, moderate leukocytosis and elevated ESR may be observed; in dry polyarthritis, complete blood count parameters are within reference ranges.
In sHLH, leukopenia and/or thrombocytopenia, and/or erythropenia, and a possible decrease in ESR may occur. Normal leukocyte and platelet counts in patients with fever may indicate ongoing sHLH. Single-, double-, or triple-line cytopenia may also be an undesirable manifestation of treatment with NSAIDs and/or methotrexate**, and/or biologic DMARDs.
It is recommended to determine prothrombin index, test for soluble fibrin monomer complexes in the blood, determine prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, determine activated partial thromboplastin time, determine thrombin time in the blood, test for protein C level in the blood, determine protein S activity in the blood, test for plasminogen level in the blood, test for fibrinogen level in the blood, determine D-dimer concentration in the blood, test for von Willebrand factor activity and properties in the blood, determine antithrombin III activity in the blood in patients with signs of vasculitis before prescribing/adjusting therapy in order to assess the hemostatic system and address the issue of its correction [3,32,46–49,51,53–55]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: changes in the hemostatic system resembling hypercoagulation can be observed in patients with seropositive polyarthritis and vasculitis, or juvenile ankylosing spondylitis, and resembling hyper-/hypocoagulation during the development of sHLH.
It is recommended to test for blood heparin level in patients with signs of vasculitis before prescribing/adjusting anticoagulant therapy in order to evaluate its effectiveness [3,32,46–48,50,51,56,244,245]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to perform thromboelastography in patients with signs of vasculitis before prescribing/adjusting therapy in order to develop an anticoagulant therapy strategy [46,47,50,51,56–59,246,247]. (Credibility Level 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to test for total blood protein, blood albumin, total blood bilirubin, free and conjugated blood bilirubin, blood creatinine, blood urea, blood uric acid, blood glucose, blood ferritin, blood triglycerides, blood cholesterol, blood sodium, blood potassium, total blood calcium, lactate dehydrogenase activity in the blood, aspartate aminotransferase activity in the blood, alanine aminotransferase activity in the blood, gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in the blood, alkaline phosphatase activity in the blood, serum iron, creatine kinase activity in the blood, pancreatic amylase activity in the blood, and lipase activity in the blood in all patients before prescribing/adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to assess electrolyte composition, liver, kidney, and pancreatic function, and to detect markers of HLH [1,3,4,32,42,44,64–67]. (Credibility Level 5, Recommendation Grade C)
Comments: elevated triglycerides, ferritin, LDH, AST, and ALT indicate the development of sHLH; elevated creatinine and/or urea, and/or ALT, AST, and/or amylase, and/or GGT, and/or ALP, and/or K, and/or total bilirubin, and/or glucose, and/or cholesterol, and triglycerides can be an undesirable manifestation of treatment with NSAIDs and/or immunosuppressants, and/or biologic DMARDs, and/or glucocorticoids.
Some patients show a decrease in serum iron levels, reflecting the presence of anemia of chronic disease.
It is recommended to determine the main AB0 blood groups, sub-groups and other minor blood groups (A-1, A-2, D, Cc, E, Kell, Duffy), and to determine the Rh blood group D antigen (Rhesus factor) in all patients prior to invasive procedures (esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy with biopsy, kidney biopsy) or blood transfusions [1,3,60–63]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 5, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to measure the blood procalcitonin level in patients with fever prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to rule out a septic process [32,150–153]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 3, Recommendation Strength: C)
Comments: procalcitonin levels rise during bacterial infection and acute inflammatory response.
It is recommended to measure the serum C-reactive protein level in all patients prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to assess disease activity [1,3,4,43,44,65,68,69]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 3, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to determine anti-streptolysin-O in the blood serum of all patients prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to detect/rule out group A $\beta$-hemolytic streptococcus infection [1,3,4,44,65,72,73]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 3, Recommendation Strength: C)
Comments: if the serum anti-streptolysin-O level is elevated, an otorhinolaryngologist consultation is required to determine the need for further examination to rule out chronic foci of ENT infection.
It is recommended to determine the blood rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), and antinuclear and anti-DNA antibodies in all patients prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to identify immunological markers [1,3,4,32,44,65,66,70,71]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 3, Recommendation Strength: C)
Comments: an elevated level of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is typically observed in patients at risk for developing uveitis or already presenting with uveitis, as well as in patients with seropositive polyarthritis; elevated levels of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies are observed in patients receiving TNF-alpha inhibitors as a manifestation of a lupus-like reaction.
It is recommended to perform lymphocyte subset analysis in all patients receiving #rituximab** (L01XC), as well as in patients with a high frequency of viral and purulent bacterial infections, including opportunistic infections, prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to rule out an immunodeficiency state developed during immunosuppressive therapy and to address the management strategy [3,32,83–85,295–297]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 4, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to perform a focal tuberculin skin test (Mantoux test, recombinant tuberculosis allergen test in standard dilution**) and to test blood interferon-gamma in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens in all patients prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to rule out Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection [3,32,86–94,212,298]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 4, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to determine blood antibodies to Salmonella enterica, antibodies to Salmonella typhi, IgM and IgG antibodies to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, and antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica serovars in all patients prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to rule out enteric bacterial infection and to decide on etiotropic therapy [1,3,32,95,96]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 5, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to determine blood IgM and IgG antibodies to Shigella boydii, IgM and IgG antibodies to Shigella dysenteriae, IgM and IgG antibodies to Shigella sonnei, and IgM and IgG antibodies to Shigella flexneri in all patients prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to rule out enteric bacterial infection and to decide on etiotropic therapy [1,3,32,95,96]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 5, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to determine blood IgA, IgM, and IgG antibodies to Chlamydia psittaci, antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis, antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae, and IgM and IgG antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in all patients prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to confirm or rule out active chlamydial and/or mycoplasmal infection and to decide on etiotropic therapy [1,3,32,81,95–97]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 5, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative Epstein-Barr virus DNA detection by PCR in peripheral and cord blood, qualitative Epstein-Barr virus DNA detection by PCR in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative Epstein-Barr virus DNA detection by PCR in urine in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or with fever, and/or receiving #rituximab**, prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy, in order to laboratory confirm or rule out active Epstein-Barr virus infection and to decide on etiotropic therapy [1,3,32,81,113–118,299]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 5, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative Cytomegalovirus DNA detection by PCR in peripheral and cord blood, qualitative Cytomegalovirus DNA detection by PCR in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative Cytomegalovirus DNA detection by PCR in urine in patients with clinical manifestations of cytomegalovirus infection and/or with fever, and/or receiving #rituximab**, prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy, in order to laboratory confirm or rule out active cytomegalovirus infection and to decide on etiotropic therapy [1,3,32,115,116,119–122]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 4, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA detection by PCR in blood, qualitative Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA detection by PCR in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA detection by PCR in urine in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection and/or with fever, and/or receiving #rituximab**, prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy, in order to laboratory confirm or rule out active herpetic infection and to decide on etiotropic therapy [1,3,32,115,116,119]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 4, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to determine blood antibodies to Herpes simplex virus in patients with clinical signs of herpetic infection, and/or with fever, and/or receiving #rituximab**, in order to confirm or rule out active herpetic infection and to decide on etiotropic therapy [3,32,113,115,119,126–130]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 4, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to determine blood IgM and IgG antibodies to Cytomegalovirus in patients with clinical manifestations of cytomegalovirus infection and/or with fever, and/or receiving #rituximab**, prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to confirm or rule out active cytomegalovirus infection and to decide on etiotropic therapy [1,112,115,121,122,124,125]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 4, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to determine blood IgM and IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or with fever, and/or receiving #rituximab**, prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to rule out active Epstein-Barr virus infection and to decide on etiotropic therapy [3,32,112,113,115,124,126]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 4, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to determine blood antibodies to the Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen (VCA) in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or with fever, and/or receiving #rituximab**, prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to rule out active Epstein-Barr virus infection and to decide on etiotropic therapy [3,32,112,113,115,124,126]. (Reliability Level of Evidence: 5, Recommendation Strength: C)
It is recommended to determine class G antibodies (IgG) to early antigens (EA) of Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or with fever, and/or receiving #rituximab**, before prescribing/adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to exclude active Epstein-Barr virus infection and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [3,32,112,113,115,124,126]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis cysts (Pneumocystis carinii) in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to confirm/exclude Pneumocystis pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [276,277,279,280,300–303]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative PCR detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in sputum, endotracheal aspirate, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to confirm/exclude Pneumocystis pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [276–278,300–304]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies to Pneumocystis jirovecii in the blood when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected by computed tomography of the chest organs in order to confirm/exclude Pneumocystis pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [276,277,279,280,300–303]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA (M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG) with species differentiation in sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, or bronchial washings using PCR in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [124,267,270,305–310]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to detect Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid using PCR in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [256–259]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to detect Cytomegalovirus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid using PCR in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [125,311,312]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of sputum for fungi (yeast and mold) in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [124,270,271,273,300,313,314]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeast and mold) in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [124,270,271,273,300,313,314]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [124,270,271,273,300,313,314]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Aspergillus spp. in the blood of all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to determine mannan and galactomannan in lavage fluid and blood in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [124,270,271,273,300,313,314]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to determine Candida albicans mannan antigen and Aspergillus spp. galactomannan antigen in blood serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected by computed tomography of the chest organs in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [124,270,271,273,300,313,314]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to determine Candida albicans mannan antigen and Aspergillus spp. galactomannan antigen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected by computed tomography of the chest organs in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and address the issue of etiotropic therapy [124,270,271,273,300,313,314]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a general (clinical) urinalysis and urine test according to Nechiporenko in all patients before prescribing/adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to assess the functional state of the urinary system [1,3,4,32,65,159]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: micro- and macrohematuria may result from the toxic effect of NSAIDs and methotrexate** on the kidneys; proteinuria may be a manifestation of renal amyloidosis.
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of mucus from the tonsils and posterior pharyngeal wall for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms in all patients before prescribing/adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to rule out nasopharyngeal contamination by aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms [1,3,32,81,95,157,158]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of blood for sterility, and a microbiological (culture) examination of urine for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic microorganisms in patients with febrile and hectic fever before prescribing/adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to rule out sepsis [1,3,32,81,150,151,154–156]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to determine the fecal calprotectin level in patients with clinical manifestations of inflammatory bowel diseases before prescribing/adjusting antirheumatic therapy to determine further management and diagnostic tactics [3,32,160–162]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
2.3.2 Instrumental diagnostic tests
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive ultrasound examination of internal organs (including abdominal ultrasound (comprehensive) and renal ultrasound) in all patients before prescribing/adjusting therapy in order to assess the state of the liver, spleen, kidneys, and other organs, as well as to detect or rule out free fluid in the abdominal cavity [3,18,32]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: in active juvenile arthritis, enlargement and parenchymal changes of the liver and spleen, as well as lymphadenopathy, may be detected. Pathological changes in the kidneys are generally not detected in juvenile arthritis. With the development of secondary amyloidosis, pathological changes in the abdominal cavity and kidneys typical of this complication may be observed.
It is recommended to perform echocardiography in all patients before prescribing/adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to assess cardiac function and detect endocardial, myocardial, or pericardial involvement [1,3,4,32,34]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: myocarditis is characterized by left ventricular dilatation, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, hypokinesia of the posterior left ventricular wall and/or interventricular septum, signs of relative mitral, aortic, and/or tricuspid valve regurgitation, and increased pulmonary artery pressure. The pericardium, endocardium, and valve apparatus are typically unaffected in juvenile arthritis.
It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram for all patients prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to assess cardiac function [1,3,4,32,34]. (LEL 5, GR C)
Comments: if myocarditis is present, signs of left and/or right heart overload are detected. In most cases, pericarditis is not accompanied by decreased QRS voltage, ST-segment elevation, or T-wave inversion on the ECG.
It is recommended to perform Holter ECG monitoring in patients with arrhythmias or pathological electrocardiographic changes prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to develop an individualized cardiotropic therapy program [1,3,32,34,315–317]. (LEL 5, GR C)
It is recommended to perform 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with arterial hypertension prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to detect blood pressure abnormalities and develop an individualized antihypertensive therapy program [1,3,32,34,315–317]. (LEL 5, GR C)
It is recommended to perform joint ultrasound in all patients with active arthritis to assess the condition of the synovial membrane and cartilage, and to detect joint effusion [1,3,32,42,163–166]. (LEL 5, GR C)
Comments: active arthritis is characterized by an increase in synovial fluid volume, thickening (hypertrophy) of the synovial membrane, cartilage fibrillation, and cartilage erosions.
It is recommended to perform X-ray imaging of the temporomandibular joint and/or intervertebral joints, and/or elbow joint, and/or wrist joint, and/or knee joint, and/or shoulder joint, and/or hip joint, and/or ankle joint, and/or acromioclavicular joint, and/or sternoclavicular joint, and/or hand, and/or foot in two projections, or computed tomography of the joint with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), in all patients with active arthritis prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to determine the aggressiveness of the disease course and the efficacy of antirheumatic therapy [1,3,32,42,163–166]. (LEL 5, GR C)
Comments: findings may include: osteoporosis, destructive changes in bone structures, joint space narrowing, the integrity of the articular surfaces of the bones forming the joint, the presence of erosions, joint surface saucerization, cysts, areas of bone tissue necrosis, subluxations, fractures, osteophytes, calcifications, etc. Progression of destructive changes in joint cartilage and bone tissue during treatment with targeted synthetic and/or biologic DMARDs combined with (or without) an immunosuppressant is an indication for therapy adjustment.
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the joints (single joint) with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in all patients with active arthritis prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy to determine the degree of synovial membrane proliferation (pannus), cartilage damage, bone marrow edema, early manifestations of avascular necrosis, and Baker's cysts [1,3,32,166,170,318,319]. (LEL 1, GR A)
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging of the spine (single segment), computed tomography of the spine (single segment), or computed tomography of the pelvic bones with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in patients with complaints of back pain and enthesopathy (based on physical examination) when juvenile ankylosing spondylitis is suspected, prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to detect or rule out involvement of the spine and sacroiliac joints [1,3,24,32,45,171–178] (LEL 5, GR C)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in patients with neurological symptoms in order to detect brain involvement [1,3,32,307,320–324]. (LEL 4, GR C)
It is recommended to perform intravenous contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal cavity, retroperitoneal space, and pelvic organs with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in patients with a severe general condition, fever, and a discrepancy between the general condition and the severity of joint involvement, prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to detect polyserositis, as well as involvement of the abdominal organs, retroperitoneal space, and pelvis [1,3,32,41,91,168,199,202,203,210]. (LEL 5, GR C)
It is recommended to perform intravenous bolus contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in the presence of contraindications to MRI in patients with a severe general condition, fever, and a discrepancy between the general condition and joint involvement, prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to detect involvement of the abdominal organs and retroperitoneal space [1,3,32,168,204,205,325]. (LEL 5, GR C)
It is recommended to perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in all patients prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to rule out inflammatory diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract associated with the underlying disease and/or Helicobacter pylori and/or the use of NSAIDs and/or glucocorticoids [3,32,160,161,184–191]. (LEL 4, GR C)
It is recommended to perform endoscopic gastric/duodenal biopsy with pathomorphological examination of the gastric biopsy (surgical) material and microbiological (culture) examination of gastric mucosal biopsy specimens for Helicobacter pylori in patients with inflammatory, erosive, and/or ulcerative mucosal changes prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to rule out upper gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases associated with Helicobacter pylori and/or the use of NSAIDs and/or glucocorticoids [3,32,160,161,184–188,190–193,326]. (LEL 4, GR C)
It is recommended to perform chest computed tomography with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in all patients prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy, as well as in patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs combined with (or without) glucocorticoids, to rule out focal, lobar, or interstitial pneumonia and pulmonary tuberculosis [1,3,32,41,86,90–92,168,168,199–201,212]. (LEL 4, GR C)
Comments: interstitial pneumonia most commonly develops during treatment with #rituximab**, less frequently with tocilizumab**, and extremely rarely with TNF-alpha inhibitors. Focal and lobar pneumonia develop during therapy with tocilizumab** and TNF-alpha inhibitors.
Interstitial pneumonia should be suspected upon the appearance of low-grade/high-grade fever, dry cough / cough with a scanty amount of sputum, crepitations / weakened breath sounds on auscultation, and dyspnea.
Focal or lobar pneumonia developing during tocilizumab** therapy is typically characterized by an asymptomatic course.
It is recommended to perform bronchoscopy with anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in patients with pulmonary involvement prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to assess the condition of the bronchial mucosal membrane and obtain bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for further examination [124,270,271,273,300,313,314]. (LEL 3, GR B)
It is recommended to perform X-ray densitometry in patients currently or previously treated with glucocorticoids, prior to prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in order to detect osteopenia or osteoporosis and develop a therapeutic management plan [3,32,327,328]. (LEL 5, GR C)
It is recommended to perform respiratory flowmetry in all patients with lung damage before prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy to assess the functional state of the bronchopulmonary system. (LoE 5, GoR C)
2.3.3 Other diagnostic procedures
Specialist consultations aimed at diagnosing and treating manifestations of the underlying disease, comorbidities, and/or complications.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by an otorhinolaryngologist in all patients before prescribing or adjusting therapy to identify foci of chronic infection in ENT organs and resolve the issue of sanitation [1,3,32,95,329]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a pediatric dentist in all patients before prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy to determine the condition of the oral cavity and the need for its sanitation [1,3,4,32,215,330,331]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by an ophthalmologist with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy in all patients before prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy to rule out uveitis, as well as in patients receiving GCs to rule out complicated cataracts [1,3,15,32,332,333]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: local therapy is prescribed to patients with uveitis, and local therapy is prescribed to patients with complicated steroid cataracts.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a pediatric cardiologist in patients with cardiac disorders and/or arterial hypertension to address the issue of cardiotropic and/or antihypertensive therapy before prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy [1,3,32,34,334]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a phthisiatrician before prescribing or adjusting antirheumatic therapy in patients with a positive focal tuberculin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculosis allergen, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or focal or infiltrative lung changes to address the issue of chemoprophylaxis or anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy [3,32,86,88,90–92,212,213]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a pediatric endocrinologist in patients with comorbid endocrinological pathology, including steroid diabetes, to address the issue of therapy management [1,3,32,327,328,335,336]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (testing, assessment) by a medical psychologist for patients aged 1 year and older and their parents to harmonize the development of the child's personality in the context of a severe chronic disease and optimize parent-child relationships; to increase treatment adherence and cooperation with the physician and medical staff to achieve disease remission; to achieve psychological social adaptation; and to develop an individual psychological rehabilitation program for the patient and their parents [32,221–227,337–339]. (LoE 2, GoR A)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a neurologist in patients with neurological symptoms, psychomotor developmental delay, or psychotic reactions to address the issue of therapy management [1,3,4,32,216]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a dietitian in patients with weight loss, amyotrophy, osteopenia/osteoporosis, constitutional obesity, Cushing's syndrome, and steroid diabetes to develop an individual dietary nutrition program [1,3,32,340,341]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by an orthopedic traumatologist in patients with joint functional insufficiency, impaired bone longitudinal growth, subluxations, back pain, as well as to address the issue of reconstructive surgery and joint replacement [1,3,32,214]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist in all patients scheduled for examinations under anesthesia to assess their condition [60,61,218–220]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist in all patients in critical condition to address the issue of transfer to the intensive care unit [60,61,218–220]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to provide 24-hour monitoring by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for all patients in critical condition (single/multiple organ failure, MAS) to provide care in the intensive care unit setting [60,61,218–220]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
It is recommended to prescribe pathogenetic therapy to all patients after diagnostics, including differential diagnostics, and establishment/confirmation of the JIA diagnosis in a rheumatology inpatient setting to monitor the safety and efficacy of treatment [1,3,32]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to switch to another selective immunosuppressant (JAK inhibitor) and/or generic drug exclusively for medical indications; automatic switching is not recommended in order to maintain disease remission and prevent adverse events [342–344]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to switch to another biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) and/or biosimilar exclusively for medical indications; automatic switching is not recommended in order to maintain disease remission, prevent the formation of neutralizing antibodies, and avoid adverse events [342–344]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: currently, biosimilars of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors (anti-TNF) as well as generics of JAK inhibitors are registered, which are structurally equivalent. Some of these drugs have demonstrated efficacy similar to original drugs in clinical trials in adult patients [345]. However, clinical trials of biosimilars and generics of immunosuppressants and selective immunosuppressants have not been conducted in the pediatric population with juvenile arthritis.
The original immunosuppressant and/or selective immunosuppressant, and/or biologic DMARD cannot be automatically replaced with a generic or biosimilar. Drug substitution may only be carried out based on a consensus of the attending physician who initiated therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or selective immunosuppressant, and/or biologic DMARD, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
3.1 Conservative Treatment
3.1.1 Treatment of juvenile polyarthritis (seronegative and seropositive polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis)
It is recommended to evaluate the efficacy of any medicinal product used for pathogenetic therapy at 3 and 6 months, and then every 6 months of therapy (a drug is considered effective upon achieving a 50% improvement according to ACRpedi criteria at 3 months, or inactive disease status at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria) (see Appendix 3) [1,3,32,346,347]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to adjust therapy (switch drugs) until efficacy or minimal/low disease activity is achieved in patients with long-standing disease, regardless of the drug used [1,3,32,346,347]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe NSAID monotherapy (M01A) for a duration of no more than 1 month at the diagnostic stage in patients with an unconfirmed JIA diagnosis to achieve an anti-inflammatory effect [1,3,42,348–357]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe NSAIDs (M01A) to relieve fever and pain syndrome in patients with an established JIA diagnosis [1,3,42,348–357]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the following NSAID administration regimens are used:
— diclofenac** (M01AB) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— nimesulide (M01AX) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— meloxicam (M01AC) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— ibuprofen** (M01AE01) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use to achieve anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic effects [3,32,355,357–364].
Diclofenac** (M01AB) is used in children from 6 years of age in tablets and suppositories; intramuscular injections are approved from 18 years of age.
Nimesulide (M01AX) is used in children from 2 years of age as a suspension, and over 12 years of age as tablets.
Meloxicam (M01AC) is used in children from 2 years of age as a suspension, over 15 years of age as tablets; intramuscular injection is approved from 18 years of age.
Ibuprofen** (M01AE01) is used in children over 3 months of age as a suspension and over 6 years of age as tablets; the interval between doses is 6–8 hours.
#Diclofenac** (M01AB), #nimesulide (M01AX), #meloxicam (M01AC) off-label are prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is not recommended to perform NSAID monotherapy (M01A) lasting more than 1 month in order to minimize side effects of long-term NSAID use [1,3,32]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is not recommended to prescribe glucocorticoids (H02AB) orally and/or intravenously, and/or intra-articularly, and/or immunosuppressants (methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA)), and/or bDMARDs (tocilizumab** (L04AC), or adalimumab** (L04AB), or etanercept** (L04AB), or golimumab** (L04AB), or abatacept** (L04AA24), or #rituximab** (L04AC10)), and/or tofacitinib** (L04AA), or #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or baricitinib** (L04AA) until the complete laboratory and instrumental evaluation is completed, oncological, hemato-oncological, and infectious diseases are ruled out, and the JIA diagnosis is established (see sections 2, 3) [1,3,42,348]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the use of glucocorticoids (H02AB), immunosuppressants (methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA)), and/or bDMARDs (tocilizumab** (L04AC), or adalimumab** (L04AB), or etanercept** (L04AB), or golimumab** (L04AB), or abatacept** (LO4AA24), or #rituximab** (L04AC10)) and/or tofacitinib** (L04AA), or #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or baricitinib** (L04AA) in oncological and hemato-oncological diseases presenting under the mask of juvenile arthritis will significantly hinder subsequent diagnosis verification, as they have a pronounced immunosuppressive effect and obscure the clinical and morphological presentation of malignant neoplasms.
It is recommended to perform intra-articular administration of:
— betamethasone** (H02AB) in children over 3 years of age in accordance with the instructions for use or
— #triamcinolone (H02AB) in children over 12 years of age at a dose of 1-2 mg/kg (maximum dose 80 mg) when administered into the knee joints, 0.5-1 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the ankle and elbow joints, and 0.3-0.5 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the wrist joints and small joints of the hands and feet [365–368]
in patients with active mono- or oligoarthritis no more than 1 time in 4 months in order to rapidly suppress the inflammatory process in the joints [1,3,32,86,348,365–370] (LoE 5, GoR C).
Comments: if arthritis flares frequently (more often than once every 4 months), intra-articular GC administration is not performed. Indications for intra-articular GC administration are pronounced exudative changes and pain syndrome in the affected joints.
#Betamethasone** (H02AB) and #triamcinolone off-label are prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to perform pulse therapy with #methylprednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose of 10-30 mg/kg/infusion intravenously for 3, and if necessary, 5 consecutive days in case of febrile/hectic fever, polyarthritis accompanied by pain syndrome not relieved by NSAIDs (M01A), and severe functional impairment in order to achieve a rapid anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effect [3,32,358,372–375]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: pulse therapy with #methylprednisolone** (H02AB) is prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe methotrexate** (L01BA) at a dose of 15 mg/m2/week once a week subcutaneously or orally to patients with active polyarthritis immediately after diagnosis verification in case of high disease activity, regardless of the presence of poor prognostic factors, in order to induce disease remission [1,3,32,42,348,376–380]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
Comments: The subcutaneous route of administration of methotrexate** (L01BA) is preferred due to higher bioavailability.
Methotrexate** (L01BA) is preferably administered using graduated syringes (here and below).
Off-label, #methotrexate** (L01BA) is prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of treatment efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4
It is recommended to prescribe methotrexate** (L01BA) at a dose of 15 mg/m2/week once a week subcutaneously or orally to patients with active polyarthritis immediately after diagnosis verification in case of moderate disease activity and the presence of poor prognostic factors in order to induce disease remission [1,3,32,42,348,376–380]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
Comments: off-label, #methotrexate** (L01BA) is prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe methotrexate** (L01BA) at a dose of 15 mg/m2/week once a week subcutaneously or orally to patients with active polyarthritis 1 month after NSAID treatment in case of low disease activity and the presence of poor prognostic factors, or moderate disease activity and the absence of poor prognostic factors, in order to induce disease remission [1,3,32,42,348,376–380]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
Comments: off-label, #methotrexate** (L01BA) is prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is not recommended to increase the dose of methotrexate** (L01BA) > 15 mg/m2/week (not exceeding 25 mg/week) in patients with active arthritis in order to prevent the development of toxic reactions [1,3,32,42,348,376–380]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
Comments: increasing the dose of methotrexate** (L01BA) is not associated with additional therapeutic benefits.
It is recommended to administer methotrexate** (L01BA) subcutaneously in patients with active arthritis to ensure stable bioavailability of the drug [1,3,32,42,348,376–380]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
Comments: the subcutaneous route of administration of methotrexate** (L01BA) is preferred as it provides stable bioavailability.
In case of intolerance to subcutaneous methotrexate** (L01BA), oral methotrexate** (L01BA) tablets are prescribed.
Off-label, methotrexate** (L01BA) is prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of treatment efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4
It is recommended to prescribe #folic acid** (B03BB) at a dose of 1 mg daily except on the day of methotrexate administration, or 2.5–7.5 mg once a week orally during methotrexate** (L01BA) therapy in order to prevent its adverse effects [3,32,358,377,381–384]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: off-label, #folic acid** (B03BB) is prescribed for vital indications by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to switch to #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) in case of intolerance or inefficacy of methotrexate** (L01BA) in patients with seropositive polyarthritis to induce/maintain remission [3,32,42,348,358,385,386]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
Comment: #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) is preferably prescribed to adolescent patients with seropositive juvenile arthritis.
It is recommended to prescribe #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) orally: for children with a body weight < 20 kg – 10 mg daily every other day; for children with a body weight of 20–40 kg – 10 mg daily; for children with a body weight > 40 kg – 20 mg daily in order to maintain/induce disease remission [3,32,42,348,358,385,386]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
It is recommended to switch to a bDMARD or targeted synthetic immunosuppressant in case of intolerance to methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) in order to induce/maintain remission [1,42,348,387–393]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to switch to one of the following drugs:
- TNF alpha inhibitors (L04AB) [332,387–390,394] (LoE 2, GoR B)
- tocilizumab** (L04AC) [387,391] (for intravenous tocilizumab – (LoE 2, GoR B), for subcutaneous tocilizumab – (LoE 4, GoR C)
- tofacitinib** (L04AA) [392] (LoE 2, GoR B)
- #upadacitinib** (L04AA) [395–402] (LoE 4 GoR C)
- baricitinib** (L04AA) [614,615] (LoE 2, GoR B)
- abatacept** (LO4AA24) [387] (LoE 2, GoR B)
in case of intolerance to methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) in order to induce/maintain remission.
It is recommended to prescribe a bDMARD or targeted synthetic immunosuppressant in combination with methotrexate in case of its inefficacy, or #leflunomide in case of its inefficacy, or as monotherapy, or at any stage of treatment in case of persistent/increasing disease activity in order to induce remission [1,42,348,387–393]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe one of the following drugs:
- TNF alpha inhibitors (L04AB) [332,387–390,394] (for regimens using TNF alpha inhibitors in combination with methotrexate** – (LoE 2, GoR B); in combination with #leflunomide** – (LoE 5, GoR C)
- tocilizumab** (L04AC) [387,391] (for regimens using intravenous tocilizumab** in combination with methotrexate** – (LoE 2, GoR B); in combination with #leflunomide** – (LoE 5, GoR C); for regimens using subcutaneous tocilizumab** in combination with methotrexate** – (LoE 4, GoR C); in combination with #leflunomide** – (LoE 5, GoR C)
- tofacitinib** (L04AA) [392] (for regimens using #tofacitinib** in combination with methotrexate** – (LoE 2, GoR B); in combination with #leflunomide** – (LoE 5, GoR C)
- upadacitinib** (L04AA) [395–402] (LoE 5, GoR C)
- baricitinib** (L04AA) [614,615] (LoE 2, GoR B)
- abatacept** (LO4AA24) [387] (for regimens using #abatacept** in combination with methotrexate** – (LoE 2, GoR B); in combination with #leflunomide** – (LoE 5, GoR C)
in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) in case of its inefficacy, or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) in case of its inefficacy in order to induce remission.
Comments: criteria for inefficacy are failure to achieve a 50% improvement according to ACRpedi criteria at 3 months, or the inactive disease state at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria, or at any stage of treatment in case of persistent/increasing disease activity.
Similarly, switching to one of the above-mentioned drugs in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), or as monotherapy, is performed if the current drug combination is ineffective.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
For dosing regimens, see below.
It is recommended to prescribe one of the following drugs:
— adalimumab** (L04AB) citrate-free formulation (40 mg/0.4 ml) subcutaneously once every 2 weeks for patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight of 10-30 kg – 20 mg, with a body weight > 30 kg – 40 mg
— etanercept** (L04AB) lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection for patients ≥ 2 years and body weight less than 62.5 kg at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg/injection twice a week or 0.8 mg/kg/injection once a week.
— golimumab** (L04AB) for patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight < 40 kg – at a dose of 30 mg/m2 subcutaneously; ≥ 40 kg – 50 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks.
in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), or as monotherapy to induce remission [42,348,387–390,394,403–407] (for regimens using #adalimumab** or etanercept**, or golimumab** as monotherapy – (CLE 2, LCE B); in combination with methotrexate** – (CLE 2, LCE B); in combination with #leflunomide** – (CLE 5, LCE C)
Comments: in case of ineffectiveness of methotrexate** (L01BA) or ineffectiveness of #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), TNF-alpha inhibitors are preferred as first-line bDMARDs.
Monoclonal antibodies to TNF-alpha (adalimumab**, golimumab**) (L04AB) are preferably prescribed in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide** to reduce the risk of neutralizing antibodies forming.
For doses and administration schedule of methotrexate** (L01BA) and #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), see above.
Off-label, #adalimumab** (L04AB), #etanercept** (L04AB), and #golimumab** (L04AB) are prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from the parents [348].
The indication for use in children and adolescents with juvenile arthritis aged 2 to 17 years and weighing less than 62.5 kg applies only to the etanercept** medicinal product "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection". The etanercept** medicinal product "solution for subcutaneous injection" has a contraindication for use in children under 12 years of age and weighing less than 62.5 kg. [408–411]
According to the FAS clarification letter No. TN/109573/21 dated December 22, 2021, and the medical instructions for the medical use of Etanercept** [412]:
the use of the dosage form "solution for subcutaneous injection" instead of "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection" in children under 12 years of age and body mass less than 62.5 kg is not recognized as acceptable due to differences in the final concentration of solutions and the lack of studies allowing to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the 50 mg/ml solution in children. Thus, the substitution of the dosage form "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection" in this patient is impossible.
For the treatment of patients with JA, it is advisable to use the adalimumab** medicinal product citrate-free formulation 40 mg/0.4 ml to avoid causing unjustified pain to children, which occurs with the use of the adalimumab** medicinal product citrate formulation 40 mg/0.8 ml [404–407,413].
Considering the pronounced pain syndrome when using the adalimumab** medicinal product citrate formulation 40 mg/0.8 ml, the use of this formulation in pediatric patients is impossible [404–407,413].
It is recommended to prescribe tocilizumab** (L04AC):
— for children with a body weight < 30 kg – at a dose of 10 mg/kg/injection, for children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg – at a dose of 8 mg/kg/injection intravenously, intravenously once every 4 weeks.
or
— for children with a body weight < 30 kg at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 3 weeks, for children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg – at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks.
in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), or as monotherapy to induce disease remission [42,348,387,391,414]. (for regimens using tocilizumab** intravenous formulation as monotherapy – (CLE 2, LCE B), in combination with methotrexate** – (CLE 2, LCE B); for regimens using tocilizumab** subcutaneous formulation as monotherapy – (CLE 4, LCE C), in combination with methotrexate** – (CLE 4, LCE C); for regimens using tolcizumab** intravenous or subcutaneous formulations in combination with #leflunomide** – (CLE 5, LCE C).
Comments: for doses and administration schedule of methotrexate** (L01BA) and #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), see above.
#Tocilizumab** (L04AC) is prescribed for vital indications in children under 2 years of age intravenously or in children under 1 year of age subcutaneously by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from the parents [348].
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to prescribe:
— tofacitinib** (L04AA) orally to patients aged ≥ 2 years and body weight ≥ 40 kg at a dose of 5 mg twice daily (total daily dose 10 mg) or
— #upadacitinib** (L04AA) orally to patients aged ≥ 12 years and body weight ≥ 40 kg 15 mg once daily.
— baricitinib** (L04AA) orally to patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight ≥ 10 kg - < 30 kg 2 mg once daily, to children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg – 4 mg once daily [614,615]
in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or as monotherapy to induce disease remission [392,395,397–402]. (for regimens using tofacitinib**, baricitinib** as monotherapy – (CLE 2, LCE B), in combination with methotrexate** – (CLE 2, LCE B); for regimens using #upadacitinib** as monotherapy – (CLE 4, LCE C), in combination with methotrexate** – (CLE 4, LCE C).
Comments: for doses and administration schedule of methotrexate** (L01BA) and #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), see above.
#Tofacitinib** (L04AA) is prescribed for vital indications in children aged ≤ 2 years, by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from the parents [415].
#Baricitinib** (L04AA) is prescribed for vital indications in children aged ≤ 2 years, by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from the parents [614,615].
#Upadacitinib** (L04AA) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from the parents and children over 15 years of age [392,395,397–402].
It is recommended to prescribe abatacept** (LO4AA24) intravenously to children over 6 years of age with a body weight of less than 75 kg at a dose of 10 mg/kg/injection, to children with a body weight of 75-100 kg – at a dose of 750 mg, to children with a body weight of more than 100 kg – at a dose of 1000 mg according to the schedule at weeks 0, 2, 4, then every 4 weeks in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), or as monotherapy to induce disease remission [42,348,387,416]. (for regimens using abatacept** as monotherapy – (CLE 2, LCE B), in combination with methotrexate** – (CLE 2, LCE B); in combination with #leflunomide** – (CLE 5, LCE C).
Comments: abatacept** (LO4AA24) is preferably used as a first-line bDMARD for the treatment of seropositive polyarthritis.
For doses and administration schedule of methotrexate** (L01BA) and #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), see above.
#Abatacept** (LO4AA24) in children under 6 years of age is prescribed for vital indications by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from the parents [348].
It is recommended to switch to #rituximab** (L01XC) in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or with #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) in case of ineffectiveness of TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB), tocilizumab** (L04AC), abatacept** (LO4AA24), tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), baricitinib** (L04AA) in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or with #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), or as monotherapy to induce disease remission [417–420]. (for regimens using #rituximab** in combination with methotrexate** – (CLE 3, LCE B); in combination with #leflunomide** – (CLE 5, LCE C).
Comments: criteria of ineffectiveness: failure to achieve 50% improvement according to ACRpedi criteria in 3 months, inactive disease stage according to criteria in 6 months, remission in 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria, or at any stage of treatment with persistent/increasing disease activity.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to switch to #rituximab** (L01XC) in case of intolerance to TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB), tocilizumab** (L04AC), abatacept** (LO4AA24), tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or baricitinib** (L04AA) at any stage of treatment to maintain/induce disease remission [418–420]. (CLE 4, LCE C)
Comments: #rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from the parents and children over 15 years of age.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to prescribe #rituximab** (L01XC) at a dose of 375 mg/m2 of body surface area intravenously once a week for 4 consecutive weeks to maintain/induce disease remission [417–419]. (CLE 4, LCE C)
Comments: in seropositive polyarthritis #rituximab** (L01XC) can be a first-line bDMARD in case of ineffectiveness of methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), as well as a second-line bDMARD in case of ineffectiveness/intolerance of #abatacept** (LO4AA24).
For doses and administration schedule of methotrexate** (L01BA) and #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), see above.
Courses of treatment with #rituximab** (L01XC) (4 infusions over 4 consecutive weeks) are administered once every 22–24 weeks if disease activity persists, taking into account infectious and non-infectious complications. If clinical inactivity / remission is not achieved after the 3rd course of treatment with #rituximab** (L01XC), rituximab treatment should be discontinued.
#Rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to prescribe #rituximab** (L01XC) in combination with #co-trimoxazole** (J01EE) at a dose of 5 mg/kg based on trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily for the prevention of Pneumocystis pneumonia in accordance with international guidelines [303,3,32,276]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is recommended to withdraw biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs), tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or baricitinib** (L04AA) in case of their intolerance, and to prescribe oral glucocorticoids (H02AB) at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) at any stage of treatment to induce disease remission [1,3,42,348,356,401,421]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
Comments: for doses and administration schedule of methotrexate** (L01BA) and #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), see above.
It is recommended to additionally prescribe GCs (H02AB): oral prednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day or methylprednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose equivalent to prednisolone (not exceeding 60 mg/day) in case of inefficacy of methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) in combination with bDMARDs, tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or baricitinib** (L04AA), or upon an increase in disease activity at any stage of treatment to induce disease remission [1,3,42,348,356,421,401,422, 614-617]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
Comments: criteria for inefficacy: failure to achieve a 50% improvement according to the ACRpedi criteria at 3 months, inactive disease stage at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria, or at any stage of treatment upon persistence/increase of disease activity.
For doses and administration schedule of methotrexate** (L01BA) and #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), see above.
It is recommended to perform therapy adjustment (drug switching) in all patients until efficacy is achieved [347,423]. (LeD 4, LoR C)
Comments: the main goal of treatment for juvenile arthritis (JA) is to achieve inactive disease/remission; therapy is adjusted until a 50% reduction in disease activity is achieved at least by 3 months, and the goal (inactive disease/remission) by 6 months of treatment, regardless of the drug used.
3.1.2 Treatment of pauciarticular juvenile arthritis (oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, persistent)
It is recommended to prescribe NSAID monotherapy (M01A) for a duration of no more than 1 month at the diagnostic stage in patients with an unconfirmed JIA diagnosis to achieve an anti-inflammatory effect [1,3,42,348–357]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to monitor the efficacy of any medicinal product used for pathogenetic therapy at 3 and 6 months, and then every 6 months of therapy (the drug is effective if a 50% improvement according to ACRpedi criteria is achieved at 3 months, or inactive disease stage at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria) [1,3,32,346,347]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is recommended to adjust therapy (drug switching) until efficacy or minimal/low disease activity is achieved in patients with a long-standing disease, regardless of the drug used [1,3,32,346,347]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe NSAIDs (M01A) to relieve fever and pain syndrome in patients with an established JIA diagnosis [1,3,42,348–357]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the following NSAID administration regimens are used:
— diclofenac** (M01AB) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— nimesulide (M01AX) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— meloxicam (M01AC) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— ibuprofen** (M01AE01) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use to achieve anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic effects [3,32,355,357–364].
Diclofenac** (M01AB) is used in children from 6 years of age in tablets and suppositories; intramuscular injections are approved from 18 years of age.
Nimesulide (M01AX) is used in children from 2 years of age as a suspension, and over 12 years of age as tablets.
Meloxicam (M01AC) is used in children from 2 years of age as a suspension, over 15 years of age as tablets; intramuscular injection is approved from 18 years of age.
Ibuprofen** (M01AE01) is used in children over 3 months of age as a suspension and over 6 years of age as tablets; the interval between doses is 6–8 hours.
#Diclofenac** (M01AB), #nimesulide (M01AX), #meloxicam (M01AC) off-label are prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is not recommended to perform NSAID (M01A) monotherapy lasting more than 2 months in order to minimize side effects of long-term NSAID use [1,3,32,424–426]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is not recommended to prescribe oral and/or intravenous and/or intra-articular glucocorticoids (H02AB), and/or methotrexate** (L01BA), and/or bDMARDs (#adalimumab** (L04AB) or #etanercept** (L04AB), or #golimumab** (L04AB), or tocilizumab** (L04AC), or abatacept** (LO4AA24), or #rituximab** (L01XC)), and/or tofacitinib** (L04AA), or #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or baricitinib** (L04AA) prior to completing a full laboratory and instrumental workup, ruling out oncological, hemato-oncological, and infectious diseases, and establishing a diagnosis of JA (see sections 2, 3) [1,3,42,348]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
Comments: the use of GCs (H02AB), methotrexate** (L01BA), bDMARDs (#adalimumab** (L04AB) or #etanercept** (L04AB), or #golimumab** (L04AB), or tocilizumab** (L04AC), or abatacept** (LO4AA24), or #rituximab** (L01XC)), and/or #tofacitinib** (L04AA), or #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or baricitinib** (L04AA) in oncological and hemato-oncological diseases presenting under the guise of JA significantly complicates subsequent diagnosis verification, as they possess a pronounced immunosuppressive effect and mask the clinical and morphological picture of malignant neoplasms.
It is recommended to perform intra-articular administration of:
— betamethasone** (H02AB) in children over 3 years of age in accordance with the instructions for use or
— #triamcinolone (H02AB) in children over 12 years of age at a dose of 1-2 mg/kg (maximum dose 80 mg) when administered into the knee joints, 0.5-1 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the ankle and elbow joints, and 0.3-0.5 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the wrist joints and small joints of the hands and feet [365–368]
in patients with active mono- or oligoarthritis no more than once every 4 months to rapidly relieve the inflammatory process in the joints [1,3,32,86,348,365–370]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
Comments: if arthritis flares frequently (more often than once every 4 months), intra-articular GC administration is not performed. Indications for intra-articular GC administration are pronounced exudative changes and pain syndrome in the affected joints.
#Betamethasone** (H02AB) and #triamcinolone off-label are prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe methotrexate** (L01BA) at a dose of 10–15 mg/m2/week once a week orally or subcutaneously to patients with active oligoarthritis immediately after diagnosis verification in case of high disease activity, regardless of the presence of poor prognostic factors, to induce disease remission [1,3,42,348,376–381,427]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe methotrexate** (L01BA) at a dose of 10–15 mg/m2/week once a week orally or subcutaneously to patients with active oligoarthritis immediately after diagnosis verification in case of moderate disease activity and the presence of poor prognostic factors, to induce disease remission [1,3,42,348,376–381,427]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe methotrexate** (L01BA) at a dose of 10–15 mg/m2/week once a week orally or subcutaneously to patients with active oligoarthritis in case of NSAID treatment failure for 1–2 months and intra-articular GC injections (need for injections more frequently than once every 4 months), with low disease activity and the presence of poor prognostic factors, or moderate disease activity and the absence of poor prognostic factors, to induce disease remission [1,3,42,348,376–381,427]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is not recommended to increase the dose of methotrexate** (L01BA) > 15 mg/m2/week (not exceeding 25 mg/week) in patients with active arthritis to prevent the development of toxic reactions [1,3,42,348,376–381,427,428]. (LeD 2, LoR B)
Comments: increasing the dose of methotrexate** (L01BA) is not associated with additional therapeutic benefits.
It is recommended to administer methotrexate** (L01BA) subcutaneously in patients with active arthritis to ensure stable drug bioavailability [1,3,42,348,376–381,427,428]. (LeD 2, LoR B)
Comments: the subcutaneous route of administration of methotrexate** (L01BA) is preferred as it ensures stable bioavailability.
In case of intolerance to subcutaneous methotrexate, oral methotrexate tablets are prescribed.
Monitoring of treatment efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4
It is recommended to prescribe #folic acid** (B03BB) at a dose of 1 mg daily except on the day of methotrexate administration, or 2.5–7.5 mg once a week orally during methotrexate** (L01BA) therapy to prevent its side effects [3,32,358,377,381–384]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
Comments: #folic acid** (B03BB) off-label use is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to switch to a bDMARD or a targeted synthetic DMARD in case of methotrexate** (L01BA) intolerance to induce/maintain remission [1,42,348,390,392,393,403,415,430–433]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is recommended to switch to one of the following drugs:
— TNF alpha inhibitors (L04AB) [45,348,390,403] (LeD 5, LoR C)
— #tocilizumab** (L04AC) [372,431,432] (LeD 5, LoR C)
— #tofacitinib** (L04AA) [392,415,430] (LeD 5, LoR C)
— #upadacitinib** (L04AA) [395–402] (LeD 5, LoR C)
— baricitinib** (L04AA) [614,615] (LeD 2, LoR B)
— #abatacept** (LO4AA24) [42,45,372,433] (LeD 5, LoR C)
in case of intolerance to methotrexate** (L01BA) to induce/maintain disease remission.
Comment: switching from one of the specified drugs to another is performed similarly at any stage of treatment in case of their intolerance. For dosing regimens, see below.
Monitoring treatment efficacy – see Appendix G1-G4
It is recommended to prescribe a bDMARD or a targeted synthetic DMARD in combination with methotrexate** in case of its inefficacy, or as monotherapy, or at any stage of treatment upon persistence/increase of disease activity to induce remission [1,42,348,390,392,393,403,415,430–433]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe one of the following drugs:
— TNF alpha inhibitors (L04AB) [45,348,390,403] (LeD 5, LoR C)
— #tocilizumab** (L04AC) [372,431,432] ( száll. 5, bizonyítékcsoport C / Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C )
— #tofacitinib** (L04AA) [372,392,415,430] (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
— #upadacitinib** (L04AA) [395–402] (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
— baricitinib** (L04AA) [614,615] (LeD 2, LoR B)
— #abatacept** (LO4AA24) [42,45,372,433] (LeD 5, LoR C)
in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) in case of its ineffectiveness, with the aim of inducing remission.
Comments: criteria for inefficacy are failure to achieve a 50% improvement according to ACRpedi criteria at 3 months, or the inactive disease state at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria, or at any stage of treatment in case of persistent/increasing disease activity.
Similarly, patients are switched to one of the aforementioned drugs in combination with methotrexate** or as monotherapy if the current drug combination proves ineffective.
For monitoring the efficacy of therapy, see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to prescribe one of the following drugs:
— #adalimumab** (L04AB) citrate-free formulation (40 mg/0.4 mL) subcutaneously every 2 weeks for patients with a body weight of 10–30 kg – 20 mg, and with a body weight > 30 kg – 40 mg [42,348,372,389,403–407]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
— #etanercept** (L04AB) at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg/administration twice a week or 0.8 mg/kg/administration once a week [403,390,348,42,372,405,407,434]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
— #golimumab** (L04AB) at a dose of 30 mg/m2 subcutaneously (maximum dose 50 mg) once every 4 weeks [388,403,348,42,372,405,407]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or as monotherapy with the aim of inducing disease remission.
Comments: if methotrexate** (L01BA) is ineffective, TNF-alpha inhibitors are preferred as first-line bDMARDs.
Monoclonal antibodies against TNF-alpha (#adalimumab**, #golimumab**) (L04AB) are preferably prescribed in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) to reduce the risk of neutralizing antibodies.
For doses and administration regimen of methotrexate** (L01BA), see above.
#Adalimumab** (L04AB) is prescribed off-label for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, and after obtaining informed consent from the parents [348]. For the treatment of patients with juvenile arthritis (JA), it is advisable to use the citrate-free formulation of adalimumab 40 mg/0.4 mL to avoid causing unjustified pain in children, which occurs with the citrate-containing formulation of adalimumab 40 mg/0.8 mL [404–407,413].
Given the pronounced pain syndrome associated with the use of the citrate-containing formulation of #adalimumab** 40 mg/0.8 mL, the use of this formulation in pediatric patients is impossible [404–407,413].
#Etanercept** (L04AB) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, and after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age [348].
The indication for use in children and adolescents with juvenile arthritis aged 2 to 17 years and with a body weight of less than 62.5 kg applies only to the medicinal product #etanercept** "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous administration". The medicinal product #etanercept** "solution for subcutaneous administration" has a contraindication for use in children under 12 years of age and with a body weight of less than 62.5 kg. [408–411]
According to the FAS clarification letter No. TN/109573/21 dated 22.12.2021 and medical instructions for the use of the medicinal product #Etanercept** [412]:
the use of the dosage form "solution for subcutaneous injection" instead of "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection" in children under 12 years of age and body mass less than 62.5 kg is not recognized as acceptable due to differences in the final concentration of solutions and the lack of studies allowing to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the 50 mg/ml solution in children. Thus, the substitution of the dosage form "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection" in this patient is impossible.
#Golimumab** (L04AB) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, and after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age [348].
It is recommended to prescribe #tocilizumab** (L04AC)
— for children with body weight < 30 kg – at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration, for children with body weight ≥ 30 kg – at a dose of 8 mg/kg/administration intravenously, intravenously once every 4 weeks or
— for children with a body weight < 30 kg at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 3 weeks, for children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg – at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks.
in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or as monotherapy with the aim of inducing disease remission [42,372,391,431,432,435]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: for doses and administration regimen of methotrexate** (L01BA), see above
#Tocilizumab** (L04AC) is prescribed for vital indications by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age [348].
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to prescribe one of the following drugs:
— #tofacitinib** (L04AA) orally at a dose of 5 mg twice daily (total daily dose 10 mg) [372,392,397,399,401,405,415] (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C) or
— #upadacitinib** (L04AA) orally for patients ≥ 12 years and body weight ≥ 40 kg – 15 mg once daily with the aim of inducing disease remission [372,395,397–402]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
— baricitinib** (L04AA) orally for patients ≥ 2 years with body weight ≥ 10 kg to < 30 kg, 2 mg once daily, for children with body weight ≥ 30 kg – 4 mg once daily [614,615] (Level of Evidence 2, Grade of Recommendation B)
in combination with methotrexate** or as monotherapy with the aim of inducing disease remission [372,392,395,397–401,405,415].
Comments: for doses and administration regimen of methotrexate** (L01BA), see above.
#Tofacitinib** (L04AA) and #upadacitinib** (L04AA) are prescribed for vital indications by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age [395–402,415].
#Baricitinib** (L04AA) is prescribed for vital indications in children aged ≤ 2 years, by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from the parents [614,615].
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to prescribe #abatacept** (LO4AA24) intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration according to the schedule at weeks 0, 2, and 4, then every 4 weeks in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or as monotherapy with the aim of inducing disease remission [42,45,372,433]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: for doses and administration regimen of methotrexate** (L01BA), see above.
#Abatacept** (LO4AA24) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, and after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age [348].
It is recommended to switch to #rituximab** (L01XC) in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) in case of ineffectiveness of TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB), #tocilizumab** (L04AC), #abatacept** (LO4AA24), #tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), baricitinib** (L04AA) combined with methotrexate** (L01BA) or as monotherapy with the aim of inducing disease remission [1,3,32,417–420]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to switch to #rituximab** (L01XC) in case of intolerance to TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB), #tocilizumab** (L04AC), #abatacept** (LO4AA24), #tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or baricitinib** (L04AA) at any stage of treatment with the aim of maintaining/inducing disease remission [1,3,32,417–420]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: #rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from the parents and children over 15 years of age.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to prescribe #rituximab** (L01XC) at a dose of 375 mg/m2 of body surface area intravenously once a week for 4 consecutive weeks with the aim of maintaining/inducing disease remission [1,3,32,417–420]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: for doses and administration regimen of methotrexate** (L01BA), see above.
Courses of treatment with #rituximab** (L01XC) (4 infusions over 4 consecutive weeks) are administered every 22–24 weeks if disease activity persists, taking into account infectious and non-infectious complications. If after the 3rd course of treatment with #rituximab** (L01XC) the state of inactive disease/remission is not achieved, treatment with #rituximab is recommended to be discontinued.
#Rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
For monitoring therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G4.
It is recommended to prescribe #rituximab** (L01XC) in combination with #co-trimoxazole** (J01EE) at a dose of 5 mg/kg based on trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily for the prevention of Pneumocystis pneumonia in accordance with international guidelines [303,3,32,276]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is recommended to discontinue bDMARDs, #tofacitinib** (L04AA), or #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or baricitinib** (L04AA) in case of their intolerance, and to prescribe glucocorticoids (H02AB) orally at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) at any stage of treatment with the aim of inducing disease remission [1,3,42,348,356,401,421]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: for doses and administration regimen of methotrexate**, see above.
It is recommended to additionally prescribe GCs (H02AB): prednisolone** (H02AB) orally at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day or methylprednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose equivalent to prednisolone (no more than 60 mg/day) in case of ineffectiveness of methotrexate** (L01BA) in combination with bDMARDs, #tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), baricitinib** (L04AA), or in case of increasing disease activity at any stage of treatment with the aim of inducing disease remission [1,3,42,348,356,401,421,614-617]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: criteria of ineffectiveness: failure to achieve 50% improvement according to ACRpedi criteria at 3 months, inactive disease state according to criteria at 6 months, remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria, or at any stage of treatment with persistence/increase in disease activity.
It is recommended to perform therapy adjustment (switching drugs) in all patients until efficacy is achieved [347,423].
Comments: the main goal of JA treatment is to achieve a state of inactive disease/remission; therapy is adjusted until a 50% decrease in disease activity is achieved in at least 3 months, and the target (inactive disease/remission) in 6 months of treatment, regardless of the drug used.
3.1.3 Treatment of juvenile ankylosing spondylitis
It is recommended to monitor the efficacy of any medicinal product used for pathogenetic therapy at 3 and 6 months, and then every 6 months of therapy (the drug is effective if a 50% improvement according to ACRpedi criteria is achieved at 3 months, or inactive disease stage at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria) [1,3,32,346,347]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is recommended to adjust therapy (drug switching) until efficacy or minimal/low disease activity is achieved in patients with a long-standing disease, regardless of the drug used [1,3,32,346,347]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe NSAID monotherapy (M01A) for a duration of no more than 1 month at the diagnostic stage for patients with an unestablished diagnosis of juvenile arthritis with the aim of achieving an anti-inflammatory effect [1,3,42,348–357]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to prescribe NSAIDs (M01A) to relieve fever and pain in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of juvenile arthritis [1, 3, 42, 348–357]. (Level of Evidence (LoE) 5, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C)
Comments: the following NSAID administration regimens are used:
— diclofenac** (M01AB) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— nimesulide (M01AX) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— meloxicam (M01AC) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— ibuprofen** (M01AE01) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use to achieve anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic effects [3,32,355,357–364].
Diclofenac** (M01AB) is used in children from 6 years of age in tablets and suppositories; intramuscular injections are approved from 18 years of age.
Nimesulide (M01AX) is used in children from 2 years of age as a suspension, and over 12 years of age as tablets.
Meloxicam (M01AC) is used in children from 2 years of age as a suspension, over 15 years of age as tablets; intramuscular injection is approved from 18 years of age.
Ibuprofen** (M01AE01) is used in children over 3 months of age as a suspension and over 6 years of age as tablets; the interval between doses is 6–8 hours.
#Diclofenac** (M01AB), #nimesulide (M01AX), #meloxicam (M01AC) off-label are prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is not recommended to perform NSAID monotherapy (M01A) lasting more than 1 month in order to minimize side effects of long-term NSAID use [1,3,32]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is not recommended to prescribe glucocorticoids (H02AB) orally and/or intravenously and/or intra-articularly, and/or immunosuppressants (methotrexate** (L01BA) or #sulfasalazine** (A07EC01)), and/or bDMARDs (TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB), or #tocilizumab** (L04AC), or secukinumab** (L04AC10)), and/or #tofacitinib** (L04AA), or #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or baricitinib** (L04AA) before completing a full laboratory and instrumental workup, ruling out oncological, onco-hematological, and infectious diseases, and establishing a diagnosis of juvenile arthritis (see sections 2, 3) [1, 3, 42, 348]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the use of GCs, immunosuppressants (#methotrexate** (L01BA) or #sulfasalazine** (A07EC01)), bDMARDs (#adalimumab** (L04AB) or #etanercept** (L04AB), or #golimumab** (L04AB), or secukinumab** (L04AC10), or #tocilizumab** (L04AC), and/or #tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), baricitinib** (L04AA) in oncological and onco-hematological diseases mimicking juvenile arthritis will significantly complicate subsequent diagnosis verification, as they have a pronounced immunosuppressive effect and mask the clinical and morphological features of malignant neoplasms.
It is recommended to perform intra-articular administration of:
— betamethasone** (H02AB) in children over 3 years of age in accordance with the instructions for use or
— #triamcinolone (H02AB) in children over 12 years of age at a dose of 1-2 mg/kg (maximum dose 80 mg) when administered into the knee joints, 0.5-1 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the ankle and elbow joints, and 0.3-0.5 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the wrist joints and small joints of the hands and feet [365–368]
in patients with active mono- or oligoarthritis no more than once every 4 months to rapidly relieve the inflammatory process in the joints [1,3,32,86,348,365–370]. (LeD 5, LoR C)
Comments: if arthritis flares frequently (more often than once every 4 months), intra-articular GC administration is not performed. Indications for intra-articular GC administration are pronounced exudative changes and pain syndrome in the affected joints.
#Betamethasone** (H02AB) and #triamcinolone off-label are prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe one of the following drugs:
- sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) at a dose of 30–50 mg/kg/day orally [1, 3, 32, 437–441]. (LoE 5, GoR C) or
- methotrexate** (L01BA) at a dose of 10–15 mg/m2/week once a week subcutaneously or orally [1, 3, 42, 348, 376–381, 427, 428, 441]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
to patients with peripheral arthritis immediately after diagnosis verification for the purpose of inducing disease remission [1, 3, 42, 348, 376–381, 427, 428, 437–441]
Comments: recommended for use in case of NSAID failure, after the first intra-articular GC injection, or in moderate to high disease activity regardless of the presence of poor prognostic factors.
Off-label, #methotrexate** (L01BA) is prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Off-label use of #sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) is prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is not recommended for patients with active arthritis to increase the dose of methotrexate** (L01BA) > 15 mg/m2/week (maximum 25 mg/week) in order to prevent toxic reactions [1, 3, 42, 348, 376–381, 427, 428, 441]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
Comments: increasing the dose of methotrexate** (L01BA) is not associated with additional therapeutic benefits.
It is recommended to administer methotrexate** (L01BA) subcutaneously in patients with active arthritis [1, 3, 42, 348, 376–381, 427, 428, 441]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
Comments: the subcutaneous route of methotrexate** (L01BA) administration is preferred due to its higher bioavailability.
In case of intolerance to subcutaneous methotrexate** (L01BA), oral methotrexate** (L01BA) tablets are prescribed.
Off-label, #methotrexate** (L01BA) is prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
It is recommended to prescribe #folic acid** (B03BB) at a dose of 1 mg daily except on the day of methotrexate administration, or 2.5–7.5 mg once a week orally during methotrexate** (L01BA) therapy to prevent side effects [3, 32, 358, 377, 381–384]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: off-label, #folic acid** (B03BB) is prescribed for vital indications by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended, in case of intolerance to sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or methotrexate** (L01BA), to switch to one of the following drugs to induce/maintain remission:
- TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB) [25, 442–451] (LoE 2, GoR B)
- secukinumab** (L04AC10) [452–454] (LoE 2, GoR B)
- #tofacitinib** (L04AA) [392, 455] (LoE 5, GoR C)
- #upadacitinib** (L04AA) [402, 456] (LoE 5, GoR C)
- baricitinib** (L04AA) [614,615] (LoE 2, GoR B)
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to prescribe a bDMARD or targeted synthetic DMARD in combination with sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) in case of its inefficacy, or with methotrexate** (L01BA) in case of its inefficacy, or as monotherapy, or at any stage of treatment in case of persistent/increasing disease activity for the purpose of inducing remission [1, 3, 42, 348, 376–381, 427, 428, 437, 441]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe one of the following drugs:
- TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB) [25, 442–451] (LoE 2, GoR B)
- secukinumab** (L04AC10) [452–454] (LoE 2, GoR B)
- #tofacitinib** (L04AA) [392, 455] (LoE 5, GoR C)
- #upadacitinib** (L04AA) [402, 456] (LoE 5, GoR C)
- baricitinib** (L04AA) [614, 615] (LoE 2, GoR B)
in combination with sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or #methotrexate** (L01BA), or as monotherapy, or at any stage of treatment in case of persistent/increasing disease activity for the purpose of inducing remission.
Comments: criteria for inefficacy are failure to achieve a 50% improvement according to ACR JIA 50 criteria at 3 months, inactive disease status at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria, or at any stage of treatment with persistent/increasing disease activity.
Similarly, patients are switched to one of the aforementioned drugs in combination with sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or methotrexate** (L01BA), or as monotherapy in case of inefficacy of the drug combination used.
For monitoring the effectiveness of therapy, see Appendices G1–G4. Dosage regimens are provided below.
It is recommended to prescribe one of the following drugs:
- #adalimumab** (L04AB) citrate-free formulation (40 mg/0.4 mL) subcutaneously once every 2 weeks: body weight 10–30 kg – 20 mg, body weight > 30 kg – 40 mg [42, 348, 372, 388–390, 403–407, 434, 449]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
- #etanercept** (L04AB) at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg/administration twice a week or 0.8 mg/kg/administration once a week [442, 443, 445, 450]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
- #golimumab** (L04AB) at a dose of 30 mg/m2 (maximum dose 50 mg) subcutaneously once every 4 weeks [42, 348, 372, 388, 390, 403, 405, 451]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
in combination with sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or #methotrexate** (L01BA), or as monotherapy for the purpose of inducing disease remission.
Comments: if sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or #methotrexate** (L01BA) is ineffective, TNF-alpha inhibitors are preferred as first-line bDMARDs.
Monoclonal antibodies to TNF-alpha (#adalimumab**, #golimumab**) (L04AB) are preferably prescribed in combination with sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or methotrexate** (L01BA) to reduce the risk of neutralizing antibody formation.
For doses and administration schedule of sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or #methotrexate**, see above.
For the treatment of patients with juvenile arthritis, it is advisable to use the citrate-free formulation of #adalimumab** 40 mg/0.4 mL to avoid causing children unnecessary pain that occurs with the citrate-containing formulation of #adalimumab** 40 mg/0.8 mL [404–407, 413].
Given the pronounced pain syndrome associated with the use of the citrate-containing formulation of #adalimumab** 40 mg/0.8 mL, the use of this formulation in pediatric patients is impossible [404–407,413].
#Etanercept** (L04AB) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, and after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age [348].
The indication for use in children and adolescents with juvenile arthritis aged 2 to 17 years and with a body weight of less than 62.5 kg applies only to the medicinal product #etanercept** "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous administration". The medicinal product #etanercept** "solution for subcutaneous administration" has a contraindication for use in children under 12 years of age and with a body weight of less than 62.5 kg. [408–411]
According to the FAS clarification letter No. TN/109573/21 dated 22.12.2021 and medical instructions for the use of the medicinal product #Etanercept** [412]:
the use of the dosage form "solution for subcutaneous injection" instead of "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection" in children under 12 years of age and body mass less than 62.5 kg is not recognized as acceptable due to differences in the final concentration of solutions and the lack of studies allowing to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the 50 mg/ml solution in children. Thus, the substitution of the dosage form "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection" in this patient is impossible.
#Golimumab** (L04AB) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, and after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age [348].
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to prescribe secukinumab** (L04AC10) to children with body weight < 50 kg – at a dose of 75 mg, ≥ 50 kg – at a dose of 150 mg at weeks 0, 1, 2, and 3, followed by monthly maintenance administration starting at week 4 subcutaneously in combination with sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or methotrexate** (L01BA), or as monotherapy for the purpose of inducing disease remission [1, 3, 32, 452–454]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
Comments: for doses and administration schedule of sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or methotrexate** (L01BA), see above.
Secukinumab** (L04AC10) is prescribed for vital indications in children under 6 years of age subcutaneously by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to prescribe one of the following drugs:
- #tofacitinib** (L04AA) orally at a dose of 5 mg twice daily (total daily dose 10 mg) [1, 3, 32, 372, 392, 397, 399, 401, 405, 415, 455] (LoE 2, GoR B)
- #upadacitinib** (L04AA) orally in patients ≥ 12 years of age and body weight ≥ 40 kg – 15 mg once daily [1, 3, 32, 372, 395, 397–402]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
- baricitinib** (L04AA) orally in patients ≥ 2 years of age with body weight ≥ 10 kg to < 30 kg – 2 mg once daily, in children with body weight ≥ 30 kg – 4 mg once daily [614, 615] (LoE 2, GoR B)
in combination with sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or #methotrexate** (L01BA), or as monotherapy for the purpose of inducing disease remission [372, 392, 395, 397–401, 405, 415].
Comments: for doses and administration schedule of #methotrexate** and sulfasalazine (L01BA), see above.
#Tofacitinib** (L04AA) and #upadacitinib** (L04AA) are prescribed for vital indications by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
#Baricitinib** (L04AA) is prescribed for vital indications in children aged ≤ 2 years by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents [614, 615].
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to prescribe #tocilizumab** in case of inefficacy and/or intolerance to TNF-alpha inhibitors, secukinumab**, #tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib**
- in children with body weight < 30 kg – at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration, in children with body weight ≥ 30 kg – at a dose of 8 mg/kg/administration intravenously, intravenously once every 4 weeks or
- in children with a body weight < 30 kg at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 3 weeks; in children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg, at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks.
in combination with sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or #methotrexate** (L01BA), or as monotherapy to induce disease remission [1,3,32,372,431,432,435]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: for doses and administration regimen of methotrexate** (L01BA), see above.
#Tocilizumab** (L04AC) is prescribed on vital indications for children under 2 years of age intravenously or for children under 1 year of age subcutaneously by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4.
It is recommended to discontinue bDMARDs, #tofacitinib** (L04AA) or #upadacitinib** (L04AA), baricitinib** (L04AA) in case of their intolerance and to prescribe oral glucocorticoids (H02AB) at a dose of 0.25–1.0 mg/kg/day in combination with sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) or #methotrexate** at any stage of treatment to induce disease remission [1,3,42,348,356,401,421]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: for doses and administration schedule of #methotrexate** (L01BA) and GCs (H02AB), see below.
It is recommended to additionally prescribe GCs (H02AB): oral prednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day or methylprednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose equivalent to prednisolone (not exceeding 60 mg/day) in case of ineffectiveness of methotrexate** (L01BA), sulfasalazine** (A07EC01) in combination with bDMARDs, #tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), baricitinib** (L04AA), or upon increase in disease activity at any stage of treatment to induce disease remission [1,3,42,348,356,401,421]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: criteria for inefficacy: failure to achieve a 50% improvement according to the ACRpedi criteria at 3 months, inactive disease stage at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria, or at any stage of treatment upon persistence/increase of disease activity.
It is recommended to perform therapy correction (switching drugs) in all patients until efficacy is achieved [347,423]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: the main goal of JA treatment is to achieve a state of inactive disease/remission; therapy is adjusted until a 50% decrease in disease activity is achieved in at least 3 months, and the target (inactive disease/remission) in 6 months of treatment, regardless of the drug used.
3.1.4 Treatment of juvenile arthritis-associated uveitis.
It is recommended to prescribe local therapy to all patients with juvenile arthritis-associated uveitis after examination (consultation) by an ophthalmologist to induce uveitis remission [17,332,333,356]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comment: all patients with juvenile arthritis must be examined by an ophthalmologist to prescribe uveitis therapy if it is detected.
It is recommended to switch initially prescribed immunosuppressant and/or selective immunosuppressant to a generic drug, and/or bDMARD to a biosimilar exclusively upon proven therapeutic efficacy and safety of the generic or biosimilar in the pediatric patient population with a similar nosological form; automatic switching is not recommended in order to preserve disease remission, prevent the formation of neutralizing antibodies, and avoid the development of adverse events [342–344]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: currently, biosimilars of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) inhibitors, as well as generics of Janus kinase inhibitors, which are structurally equivalent to them, have been approved. Some of these drugs have demonstrated efficacy similar to original drugs in clinical trials in adult patients [345]. However, clinical trials of biosimilars and generics of immunosuppressants and selective immunosuppressants have not been conducted in the pediatric population with juvenile arthritis-associated uveitis.
The original immunosuppressant and/or selective immunosuppressant, and/or biologic DMARD cannot be automatically replaced with a generic or biosimilar. Drug substitution may only be carried out based on a consensus of the attending physician who initiated therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or selective immunosuppressant, and/or biologic DMARD, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to administer pulse therapy with #dexamethasone** (H02AB02) 1 drop 6 times a day in combination with NSAID-containing drops (diclofenac**) 1–2 drops 4–6 times a day with gradual dose reduction (by 1 drop once every 2 weeks) in acute uveitis to induce uveitis remission [17,32,332,333,356]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comment: the regimen of administration, dose reduction, and discontinuation of #dexamethasone** (H02AB02) and NSAID-containing drops is determined by the ophthalmologist.
It is recommended to instill #dexamethasone** (H02AB02) 1 drop 2–3 times a day with gradual dose reduction (1 drop once every 2 weeks) in combination with instillation of NSAID-containing drops: 1 drop 2–3 times a day with gradual dose reduction (1 drop once every 2 weeks) in subacute and indolent uveitis to induce uveitis remission [17,32,332,333]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comment: the regimen of administration, dose reduction, and discontinuation of #dexamethasone** (H02AB02) and NSAID-containing drops is determined by the ophthalmologist.
#Dexamethasone** (L04AC) is prescribed on vital indications for children under 6 years of age by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
It is recommended to administer parabulbar injections of #betamethasone** (H02AB) 0.5 ml once every 10–14 days in acute uveitis and severe panuveitis when local therapy is ineffective, in order to induce uveitis remission [17,32,332,333,356]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comment: parabulbar injections of #betamethasone** (H02AB) are prescribed and performed by an ophthalmologist. The dose, administration schedule, dose reduction, and discontinuation of #betamethasone** (H02AB) are determined by the ophthalmologist.
#Betamethasone** (H02AB) outside of age indications is prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe #tropicamide** (S01FA06) 1–2 drops twice a day for 1 month (if necessary, the course can be extended up to 2 months) in patients with iridolenticular synechiae to prevent the progression of lens deformation [15,32,356,457]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: the administration regimen of #tropicamide** (S01FA06) is determined by the ophthalmologist.
#Tropicamide** (S01FA06) outside of age indications is prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe #taurine** (S01XA) as eye drops 1–2 drops twice a day or #dexpanthenol** (D03AX03) as an eye gel once a day into the conjunctival sac at bedtime in 2-month courses with 2-month intervals in patients with dystrophic eye changes to reduce the severity of dystrophic eye changes [32,356]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: the administration regimen of #taurine** (S01XA) and #dexpanthenol** (D03AX03) is determined by the ophthalmologist.
#Taurine** (S01XA) and #dexpanthenol** (D03AX03) outside of age indications are prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe #methotrexate** (L01BA) at a dose of 10–15 mg/m2/week orally or subcutaneously once a week in case of ineffectiveness of local uveitis treatment (failure to achieve remission within 3 months) or in severe uveitis (regardless of the duration of local therapy) to induce remission of juvenile arthritis-associated uveitis [3,17,332,333,356,458–460]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: the subcutaneous route of administration of #methotrexate** (L01BA) is preferred as it provides stable bioavailability.
In case of intolerance to subcutaneous #methotrexate**, oral #methotrexate** is prescribed.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G3, G4
It is not recommended to increase the dose of #methotrexate** (L01BA) > 15 mg/m2/week (not exceeding 25 mg/week) in patients with active uveitis to prevent the development of toxic reactions [17,332,333,356]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: increasing the dose of #methotrexate** (L01BA) is not associated with additional therapeutic benefits.
It is recommended to prescribe #folic acid** (B03BB) at a dose of 1 mg daily except on the day of #methotrexate** administration or 2.5–7.5 mg once a week orally during #methotrexate** (L01BA) therapy to prevent side effects of #methotrexate** (L01BA) [3,32,358,377,381–384]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: #folic acid** (B03BB) is prescribed off-label for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to switch to one of the following drugs at any stage of treatment:
- #cyclosporine** (L04DA01) [461] (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
- #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) [17,462,463] (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
- TNF alpha inhibitors (L04AB) [372,462–465] (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
- #tocilizumab** (L04AC) [463,466] (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
- #tofacitinib** (L04AA) [467–469] (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
- #upadacitinib** (L04AA) [372,395,397–402] (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
- #baricitinib** (L04AA) [614–617] (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
- #abatacept** (LO4AA24) [463,470] (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
in case of #methotrexate** (L01BA) intolerance to induce/maintain uveitis remission.
Comments: switching from one of the specified drugs to another at any stage of treatment in case of their intolerance is performed similarly. For dosing regimens, see below.
It is recommended to prescribe #cyclosporine** (L04DA01) at a dose of 3–5 mg/kg/day orally in 2 divided doses combined with local therapy in case of #methotrexate** (L01BA) failure in patients with low or moderate uveitis activity, or upon increase in uveitis activity at any stage of treatment, as monotherapy or in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA) to induce uveitis remission [17,332,333,461,463,473]. (Quality of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: the criterion for treatment failure is failure to achieve uveitis remission after 3 months of therapy (assessed by an ophthalmologist).
#Cyclosporine** (L04DA01) is prescribed for life-saving indications by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) monotherapy orally at a dose of 600 mg/m2/day in two divided doses combined with local therapy in case of #methotrexate** (L01BA) failure and/or #cyclosporine** (L04DA01) failure as monotherapy or in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA), or upon increase in uveitis activity at any stage of treatment to induce uveitis remission [17,332,333,462,463,474]. (Quality of Evidence 4, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: the criterion for treatment failure is failure to achieve uveitis remission after 3 months of therapy (assessed by an ophthalmologist).
#Mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) is prescribed for life-saving indications by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe a TNF-alpha inhibitor (L04AB) (#adalimumab** or #golimumab**) combined with local therapy in case of #methotrexate** (L01BA) failure and/or #cyclosporine** (L04DA01) failure as monotherapy or in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) monotherapy, or upon increase in uveitis activity at any stage of treatment to induce uveitis remission [372,462–465]. (Quality of Evidence 4, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: the criterion for treatment failure is failure to achieve uveitis remission after 3 months of therapy (assessed by an ophthalmologist). Dosing regimens are given below.
It is recommended to promptly prescribe a TNF-alpha inhibitor (L04AB) in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04DA01), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) combined with local therapy at any stage of treatment in severe uveitis, panuveitis, or risk of blindness, to induce uveitis remission [372,462–465]. (Quality of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to prescribe:
- #adalimumab** (L04AB) citrate-free formulation (40 mg/0.4 mL) in patients aged ≥ 2 years with a body weight of 10–30 kg at a dose of 20 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks; > 30 kg at a dose of 40 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks [372,404–407,462–465] (Quality of Evidence 4, Strength of Recommendation C) or
- #golimumab** (L04AB) at a dose of 30 mg/m2 (maximum dose 50 mg) subcutaneously once every 4 weeks to induce uveitis remission [372,404–407,462–465]. (Quality of Evidence 4, Strength of Recommendation C)
in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04DA01), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) combined with local therapy to induce uveitis remission.
Comments: the criterion for efficacy is achievement of uveitis remission after 3 months of therapy (assessed by an ophthalmologist).
For doses and administration procedures of #methotrexate** (L01BA), #cyclosporine** (L04DA01), and #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06), see above.
#Adalimumab** (L04AB) is prescribed for life-saving indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents in children under 2 years of age.
For the treatment of patients with JIA-associated uveitis, it is advisable to use the citrate-free formulation of #adalimumab** 40 mg/0.4 mL to avoid causing unjustified pain in children, which occurs with the citrate-containing formulation of adalimumab 40 mg/0.8 mL [404–407].
Given the pronounced pain syndrome when using the 40 mg/0.8 mL dosage form, the use of this formulation in pediatric patients is impossible [404–407].
#Golimumab** (L04AB) is prescribed for life-saving indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to switch from a TNF-alpha inhibitor (L04AB) to one of the following drugs with a new mechanism of action:
- #tocilizumab** (L04AC) [463,466] (for intravenous tocilizumab – Quality of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C, for subcutaneous tocilizumab – Quality of Evidence 4, Strength of Recommendation C)
- #tofacitinib** (L04AA) [467–469] (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
- #upadacitinib** (L04AA) [398,400–402,421,475] (Quality of Evidence 4, Strength of Recommendation C)
- #baricitinib** (L04AA) [614–617] (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
- #abatacept** (L04AA24) [463,470]. (Quality of Evidence 4, Strength of Recommendation C)
in case of failure of a TNF-alpha inhibitor (L04AB) in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04DA01), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06), or upon increase in uveitis activity at any stage of treatment to induce uveitis remission.
Comments: the criterion for treatment failure is failure to achieve uveitis remission after 3 months of therapy (assessed by an ophthalmologist).
Similarly, switching from one of these drugs to another is performed in case of their failure and at any stage of treatment in case of their intolerance.
#Tocilizumab** (L04AC), #tofacitinib** (L04AA), #abatacept** (L04AA24), and #upadacitinib** (L04AA) are prescribed for life-saving indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age. Dosing regimens are given below.
It is recommended to prescribe #tocilizumab** (L04AC)
- in children with body weight < 30 kg at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration, in children with body weight ≥ 30 kg at a dose of 8 mg/kg/administration intravenously once every 4 weeks [332,333,463,466] (Quality of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C) or
- in children with body weight < 30 kg at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 3 weeks, in children with body weight ≥ 30 kg at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks [332,333,463,466] (Quality of Evidence 4, Strength of Recommendation C)
in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04DA01), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) to induce uveitis remission [332,333,463,466]. (Quality of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: the criterion for efficacy is achievement of uveitis remission after 3 months of therapy (assessed by an ophthalmologist).
#Tocilizumab** (L04AC) is prescribed for life-saving indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe
- #tofacitinib** (L04AA) orally at a dose of 5 mg twice daily (total daily dose 10 mg) or
- #upadacitinib** (L04AA) orally to patients aged ≥ 12 years with body weight ≥ 40 kg at 15 mg once daily
- #baricitinib** (L04AA) orally to patients ≥ 2 years old with body weight ≥ 10 kg to < 30 kg at 2 mg once daily, and children with body weight ≥ 30 kg at 4 mg once daily (Quality of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04DA01), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) to induce uveitis remission [398,401,402,421,467–469,475,614-617]. (Quality of Evidence 4, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: the criterion for efficacy is achievement of uveitis remission after 3 months of therapy (assessed by an ophthalmologist).
#Tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), and #baricitinib** (L04AA) are prescribed for life-saving indications by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age [401,415,475,614-617].
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G3, G4
It is recommended to prescribe #abatacept** (L04AA24) at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously at weeks 0, 2, and 4, and then every 4 weeks in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04DA01), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) to induce uveitis remission [32,332,333,463,470,476]. (Quality of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: the criterion for efficacy is achievement of uveitis remission after 3 months of therapy (assessed by an ophthalmologist).
#Abatacept** (L04AA24) is prescribed for life-saving indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
For monitoring the efficacy of therapy, see Appendices G3, G4.
It is recommended to switch to #rituximab** (L01XC) in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04DA01), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) in case of failure of TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB), #tocilizumab** (L04AC), #abatacept** (L04AA24), #tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or #baricitinib** (L04AA) combined with #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04DA01), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06), or as monotherapy to induce uveitis remission [17,333,463]. (Quality of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: efficacy criterion: achievement of uveitis remission after 3 months of therapy (assessed by an ophthalmologist).
#Rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to switch to #rituximab** (L01XC) at any stage of treatment in case of intolerance to TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB), #tocilizumab** (L04AC), #tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), #baricitinib** (L04AA), or #abatacept** (L04AA24) in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04DA01), and/or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) to induce/maintain uveitis remission [17,333,400,421,463,475]. (Quality of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: the criterion for efficacy is achievement of uveitis remission after 3 months of therapy (assessed by an ophthalmologist).
#Rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe #rituximab** (L01XC) at a dose of 375 mg/m2 of body surface area intravenously once a week for 4 consecutive weeks to maintain/induce uveitis remission [1,3,17,32,333,463]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: courses of #rituximab** (L01XC) therapy (4 infusions over 4 consecutive weeks) are administered once every 22–24 weeks if disease activity persists, taking into account infectious and non-infectious complications.
#Rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe #rituximab** (L01XC) in combination with #co-trimoxazole** (J01EE) at a dose of 5 mg/kg based on trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily to prevent Pneumocystis pneumonia in accordance with international guidelines for the treatment of immunocompromised patients [303,3,32,276]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to discontinue bDMARDs or #tofacitinib** (L04AA), or #upadacitinib** (L04AA), or #baricitinib** (L04AA) in case of their intolerance, and to prescribe oral glucocorticoids (H02AB) at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg/day in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04AA01), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) at any stage of treatment to induce uveitis remission [17,30,32,332,333,356]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: for doses and administration schedules of #methotrexate** (L01BA), #cyclosporine** (L04AA01), and #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06), see above.
For GCs doses and administration schedule, see below.
It is recommended to additionally prescribe GCs (H02AB): oral #prednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg/day or #methylprednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose equivalent to prednisolone (not exceeding 60 mg/day) in case of inefficacy of #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04AA01), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) in combination with bDMARDs or #tofacitinib** (L04AA), or #upadacitinib** (L04AA), #baricitinib** (L04AA), or if uveitis activity increases at any stage of treatment, with the aim of inducing uveitis remission [17,30,32,332,333,356]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: resistance to therapy with all bDMARDs, #tofacitinib** (L04AA), #upadacitinib** (L04AA), #baricitinib** (L04AA) in combination with #methotrexate** (L01BA) and/or #cyclosporine** (L04AA01), or #mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06) is an indication for prescribing GCs.
Efficacy criterion: achievement of uveitis remission by 3 months of treatment (evaluated by an ophthalmologist).
3.1.5 Treatment of juvenile arthritis with hemophagocytic syndrome
It is recommended to prescribe and administer therapy in a rheumatology inpatient unit after performing diagnostics, including differential diagnosis, and establishing/confirming the diagnosis of JIA with secondary macrophage activation syndrome in all patients to ensure the prevention and timely management of severe complications [1,3,32]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to prescribe targeted etiotropic therapy with systemic antibacterial agents (J01) and/or systemic antifungal agents (J02A), and/or systemic antiviral agents (J05) in patients with a known infectious etiological factor to stop the activation of the innate immune system [1,237,238,252]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to prescribe GCs (H02AB) in combination with #cyclosporine** (L04AD) and #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) in all patients to relieve MAS [237,238,250,477–481]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform pulse therapy with #methylprednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose of 20–30 mg/kg/administration intravenously or to prescribe #dexamethasone** (H02AB) at a dose of 10–20 mg/m²/day intravenously in all patients to relieve MAS [237,250,477,478,480–484]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: #dexamethasone** (H02AB) and #cyclosporine** (L04AD) are prescribed on vital indications by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to gradually taper the dose of intravenous GCs after clinical and laboratory signs of MAS are resolved according to the following regimens:
— #dexamethasone** (H02AB) starting from an initial dose of 10–20 mg/m2/day for 1–2 weeks, 5–10 mg/m2/day for 3–4 weeks, 2.5–5 mg/m2/day for 5–6 weeks, 1.25–2.5 mg/m3/day for 7–8 weeks;
— #methylprednisolone** starting from an initial dose of 20–30 mg/kg/administration for 3–5 days, tapering the dose by 25% once every 2–3 days to prevent withdrawal syndrome [1,3,237,478,481,485–488]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to prescribe #cyclosporine** at a dose of 3–5 mg/kg/day intravenously or orally to all patients to relieve MAS [237,238,250,477,478,480,481,485,489]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to prescribe #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) at a dose of 1–2 g/kg/course over 2 days intravenously to all patients to achieve an immunosuppressive effect and relieve MAS [250,481,485,490–492]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: administration of the entire course dose of #normal human immunoglobulin** is carried out by continuous prolonged infusion administered at once to ensure the blocking of IgG Fc receptors on phagocytic cells; suppression of T-lymphocyte proliferation and immunoglobulin production; interaction with the complement system; blocking the activation and action of cytokines; blocking the expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells.
#Normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to evaluate the efficacy of the applied MAS treatment regimen in accordance with the criteria for achieving a therapeutic response (resolution of fever, reduction in spleen size, increase in blood platelet count ≥ 100×109/L, normalization of blood fibrinogen level, decrease in serum ferritin concentration by 25%) every 48 hours to address the issue of continuing/changing the induction therapy regimen [237,238]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: upon achieving a response, therapy should be continued until the inactive disease stage is reached.
It is recommended to prescribe #anakinra** (L04AC) at a dose of 5–10 mg/kg/day intravenously in 2 doses for 3–10 days, if necessary longer, in case of increasing MAS activity in the first 48 hours of GC therapy in combination with #cyclosporine** (L04AD) and #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) to relieve MAS [237,238,254,493–498]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: #anakinra** (L04AC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended, in case of inefficacy of the combination of #anakinra** (L04AC) with GCs, #cyclosporine** (L04AD), and #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA), to additionally prescribe:
— #ruxolitinib** orally
for children weighing up to 10 kg – 2.5 mg × 2 times/day;
in children weighing from 10 to 25 kg – 5 mg × 2 times/day;
in children weighing > 25 kg – 10 mg × 2 times/day (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
— or #tofacitinib** (L04AA) orally at a dose of 10 mg × 2 times/day to relieve MAS [237,499,500]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: #ruxolitinib** and #tofacitinib** are prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to switch to #rituximab** (L01XC) at a dose of 375 mg/m2 per week intravenously for 1–4 consecutive weeks in case of inefficacy of the combination of #anakinra** (L04AC) with GCs, #cyclosporine** (L04AD), #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA), and #ruxolitinib** or #tofacitinib** (L04AA) to relieve MAS [237,485,501]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: #rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe #co-trimoxazole** (J01EE) at a dose of 5 mg/kg based on trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily in combination with #rituximab** (L01XC) to prevent Pneumocystis pneumonia [303,3,32,276,502]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to prescribe #prednisolone** at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg/orally or #methylprednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose equivalent to prednisolone, in case of inefficacy of combination MAS therapy or MAS reactivation during tapering/withdrawal of intravenous GCs to relieve MAS [236–238,250]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to prescribe #acyclovir** (J05AB) to children aged < 1 year at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 8 hours; to children aged ≥ 1 year at a dose of 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 8 hours in the event of Herpes zoster infection to suppress the triggering factor of HLH [3,32,213,503–506]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe #acyclovir** (J05AB) at a dose of 5–10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 8 hours for 7–10 days upon confirmation of active infection caused by Herpes simplex virus to suppress the triggering factor of HLH [3,32,504,507]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #acyclovir** (J05AB) for children < 3 years of age is prescribed by decision of the medical commission after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Treatment is carried out until complete relief of herpetic infection.
It is recommended to prescribe #ganciclovir** (J05AB) at a dose of 6 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days upon confirmation of active cytomegalovirus infection to suppress the triggering factor of HLH [3,508–511]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #ganciclovir** (J05AB) for children < 12 years of age is prescribed by decision of the medical commission after obtaining informed consent from the parents and permission from the local ethics committee of the medical organization.
It is recommended to prescribe #ganciclovir** (J05AB) at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days upon confirmation of active Epstein-Barr virus infection to suppress the triggering factor of HLH [3,32,512]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #ganciclovir** (J05AB) for children < 12 years of age is prescribed by decision of the medical commission after obtaining informed consent from the parents and permission from the local ethics committee of the medical organization.
It is recommended to prescribe #rituximab** as a first-line biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) in combination with #cyclosporine**, #normal human immunoglobulin**, and #sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim** in active Epstein-Barr virus infection to suppress viral replication in B-lymphocytes and relieve HLH [3,32,250,513]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments:
Regimens:
— #rituximab** (L01XC) – at a dose of 375 mg/m2/week intravenously for 1–4 consecutive weeks [513];
— #cyclosporine** (L04AD) – 3–5 mg/kg/day [250,513];
— #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) – 1–2 g/kg/course over 2 days [250,513];
— #sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim** (J01EE) – for the prescription procedure and doses of #sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim** (J01EE), see above [303,502].
#Rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed for life-saving indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents/patients over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe antithrombotic agents (B01A): heparin group drugs (B01B) or direct factor Xa inhibitors (B01AF); antiplatelet agents, excluding heparin (B01AC); antifibrinolytic agents (B02A) to all patients to prevent thrombotic complications and resolve coagulopathy [46,47,51,150,238,245,356,514,515]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: antithrombotic agents (B01A) outside of age indications are prescribed by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children older than 15 years.
It is recommended to perform blood transfusion in the event of consumption coagulopathy or bleeding to restore balance in the hemostatic system [242,516]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in case of consumption coagulopathy, blood transfusion and blood products (B05A) are administered: red blood cell mass, fresh frozen plasma, blood coagulation factor VII, platelet concentrate, cryoprecipitate, etc., in accordance with indications.
It is recommended to prescribe the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** (L03AA) at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously for 3–5 days (longer if necessary) when the absolute neutrophil count decreases to ≤ 1.0×109/L to restore blood neutrophil count and prevent infectious complications [1,3,32,517,518]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) in combination with systemic antifungal drugs (J02A) until resolution of agranulocytosis when the absolute neutrophil count decreases to ≤ 1.0×109/L as a planned measure to prevent infectious complications [3,32,150,151,519,520]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe empirical systemic antibacterial therapy (J01) covering gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic flora, and/or systemic antifungals (J02A), and/or systemic antivirals (J05) upon the development of sepsis/infectious complications prior to the identification of the etiological factor, with the aim of arresting/preventing the progression of the infectious process [81,150,151,154–156,237,238,516,519–523]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: systemic anti-infectives (J01), systemic antifungals (J02A), and antivirals (J05) outside of age indications are prescribed by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children older than 15 years.
It is recommended to prescribe targeted therapy based on microbial susceptibility once the etiological factor of sepsis/infectious complication is confirmed, depending on the clinical situation, using systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) (combinations of penicillins, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (J01CR), and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins (J01DE), and/or carbapenems (J01DH), and/or other antibacterials (J01XX), and/or glycopeptide antibiotics (J01XA), and/or other aminoglycosides (J01GB)), with or without systemic antifungals (J02A) and/or systemic antivirals (J05), with the aim of resolving sepsis/infectious complications [81,150,151,154–156,238,516,519–522]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to continue treatment of macrophage activation syndrome (sHLH) until criteria for the inactive phase are achieved (absence of fever, splenomegaly, cytopenia (Hb ≥ 90 g/L, platelets ≥ 100×109/L, neutrophils ≥ 0.5×109/L), blood triglyceride level < 3 mmol/L or < 265 mg/dL, ferritin ≤ 500 µg/L, normalization of cerebrospinal fluid parameters (in case of CNS involvement)) with the aim of preventing multiple organ failure and death [524]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: after resolving sHLH, therapy should be continued in accordance with the established JIA subtype (see above).
3.1.6 General principles of treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis
1. The primary goal of treatment in patients with JIA is clinical remission—the absence of symptoms of inflammatory activity, including systemic manifestations (2bC)* (see Appendices G1–G4).
2. Minimal (or low) disease activity may be an alternative goal exclusively in patients with long-standing disease (2cB)* (see Appendices G1–G4).
3. Goal setting and therapy selection must be based on the individual characteristics of the child and agreed upon with the parent/patient (5D)*.
4. Disease activity must be regularly assessed and documented using validated comprehensive instruments (2cC)* (see Appendices G1–G4).
5. The frequency of monitoring depends on the type of JIA, disease activity, and the presence of systemic manifestations (5C)*.
6. A 50% reduction in disease activity should be achieved in all patients in at least 3 months, and the target (inactive disease/remission) in 6 months of treatment. In patients with sJIA with active systemic manifestations, fever should resolve within 1 week (2bB)*.
7. Therapy should be adjusted until the target is achieved (2bC)*.
8. Monitoring must be continuous to ensure the maintenance of remission (treatment goal) (2bC)*.
A. The therapeutic strategy for JIA management is based on the cooperation of the parents/patient and the pediatric rheumatology team providing treatment and rehabilitation.
B. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a heterogeneous group of diseases, which implies various therapeutic approaches.
C. The main goals of JIA treatment are: control of clinical and laboratory manifestations of the disease, prevention of the progression of osteocartilaginous destruction and eye damage; avoidance of comorbid conditions and adverse drug reactions; ensuring functional activity, normal growth, development, high quality of life, and social adaptation of the child.
D. Cessation of the inflammatory process is a necessary condition for achieving the set goals.
E. Long-term use of systemic GCs is unacceptable for achieving the goal.
F. To achieve the goal, monitoring of disease activity and adjustment of therapy are necessary.
* PRES criteria [347].
3.2. Surgical treatment
It is recommended to perform joint replacement surgery using anesthetic management (including early postoperative care) in children with stage 3-4 secondary coxarthrosis, taking into account age restrictions, in order to restore functional activity and prevent the progression of disability [1,3,32,214,525]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
3.3. Non-pharmacological treatment
It is recommended to restrict the child's physical activity during periods of disease exacerbation [1,3,32,214,427,526]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: complete joint immobilization with splints is contraindicated as it contributes to the development of contractures, muscle atrophy, worsening of osteoporosis, and rapid development of ankylosis. Physical exercises help maintain joint functional activity. Cycling, swimming, and walking are beneficial. Running, jumping, and active games are undesirable. It is recommended to maintain an upright posture when walking and sitting, and to sleep on a firm mattress and a thin pillow.
Exclude psycho-emotional stress and sun exposure.
It is recommended that all patients with juvenile arthritis consume a diet high in calcium and vitamin D to prevent osteoporosis [1,3,32,327,328,371,527,528]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to use splints, casts, and insoles in patients with joint deformities and lower limb growth abnormalities in order to correct orthopedic disorders [1,3,32,214]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: for static orthoses, intermittent immobilization is necessary – they should be worn or put on during free time and must be removed during the day to stimulate the muscular system during physical exercises, activities, occupational therapy, and personal hygiene. In case of pronounced osteoporosis in the thoracic and lumbar spine, a corset or posture corrector should be worn; in case of cervical spine joint involvement, a cervical collar (soft, rigid) should be worn.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
It is recommended to provide medical rehabilitation services to patients with systemic connective tissue diseases, inflammatory arthropathies, and spondyloarthropathies [337,371,529–544]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
Comments: performed in all patients; an individual rehabilitation program is developed; goals and objectives of rehabilitation measures are formulated based on the rehabilitation diagnosis and rehabilitation potential for a day, a week, and the entire rehabilitation period; the motor regimen and individual intensity limits of interventions applied to a patient with impaired functions are determined; an individual exercise therapy program is developed; rehabilitation methods are determined: medications, kinesiotherapy, mechanotherapy (including therapeutic mechanotherapy in water), physiotherapy, robotics, exoskeletons, information technology, psychological correction, ergotherapy; forms of medical rehabilitation are selected at various stages of its application and in various periods of the disease course (individual, group classes, telemedicine-based classes); legal representatives of children in need of medical rehabilitation are consulted and trained in home-safe rehabilitation techniques and care skills for severely ill children.
It is recommended to administer physical therapy to patients with joint involvement, muscle atrophy, and steroid myopathy once low disease activity, inactive disease stage/remission is achieved [3,32,337,529–531,545]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: a plan is developed, and the goal and objectives of physiotherapy in a patient with sJIA are formulated during the implementation of the individual rehabilitation program; methods of physiotherapy (electro-, magneto-, photo-, mechano-, hydro-, thermotherapy) and sanatorium-resort treatment (climatotherapy, balneotherapy, pelotherapy) are selected depending on the various periods of the disease course.
It is recommended to conduct a psychological rehabilitation school for patients with juvenile arthritis and their relatives [3,32,221,222,549]. (LoE 3, GoR C)
Comments: medical rehabilitation is necessarily combined with the psychological rehabilitation of children and their parents; an individual psychological rehabilitation program and psychotherapeutic program are developed taking into account the clinical picture of the disease, identified psychological and psychosocial mechanisms of the mental disorder, clinical features, personality traits, psychotherapeutic hypothesis, and psychotherapeutic targets; psychological intervention methods (psychological therapy, psychological counseling, psychological correction, and psychological rehabilitation) are chosen; types of psychotherapy include dynamic, cognitive-behavioral, existential-humanistic, and non-mainstream modalities (art therapy, body-oriented psychotherapy, psychodrama, suggestive psychotherapy, etc.); forms of psychotherapy include individual, family/couple, group, natural environment, and milieu therapy.
It is recommended to conduct a "School for Children with Rheumatic Diseases and Their Parents" in order to provide information on the prevention of disease complications, its clinical variants, and the safety principles of antirheumatic therapy [3,32,221,222,549]. (Level of Evidence (LoE) 3, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C)
Comments: the objective of the "School for Children with Rheumatic Diseases and Their Parents" is to inform parents and children about the features, mechanisms of development, clinical presentation of the disease, treatment, mechanisms of action of medications, their efficacy, potential side effects; methods of medical and psychological rehabilitation, disease outcomes; vaccination, prevention of exacerbations, complications of the disease and adverse effects of antirheumatic drugs. Training on methods to monitor the efficacy and safety of medications using generally accepted rheumatological scales and questionnaires.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
5.1. Prevention
Primary prevention has not been established, as the etiology of juvenile arthritis remains definitively undetermined.
It is recommended to carry out the prevention of complications and exacerbations of juvenile arthritis, as well as side effects of antirheumatic therapy, in order to ensure high-quality medical care [1,3,32,430,550]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: to prevent exacerbations and complications of juvenile arthritis under the constant monitoring of clinical and laboratory parameters of disease activity, long-term maintenance therapy is carried out, developed taking into account the individual characteristics of the patient and the disease variant, with its correction if necessary; a protective regimen is ensured (psycho-emotional and physical loads are limited, during the exacerbation period children are homeschooled and attend school during the inactive disease/remission stage, contacts are limited to reduce the risk of infectious diseases); insolation, trips to regions with high levels of insolation, and UV therapy are excluded, sunscreens must be used, wearing clothing that covers the skin as much as possible and wide-brimmed hats is recommended; hypothermia is prevented; an individual vaccination approach is developed; the use of live vaccines and immunomodulators is excluded.
To reduce the risk of side effects from antirheumatic drugs, regular monitoring of clinical and laboratory safety parameters is performed; the use of medications that increase the toxicity of GCs, immunosuppressants, and bDMARDs is avoided.
It is not recommended to administer vaccination with live and live-attenuated vaccines simultaneously with biologic DMARD (bDMARD) and immunosuppressant therapy in patients receiving bDMARDs [1,3,32,551–553]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the safety of such a combination has not been established. An exacerbation of juvenile arthritis may develop. There are no data on the secondary transmission of infection from patients immunized with live vaccines to patients receiving bDMARDs.
It is recommended to carry out pre-exposure prophylaxis for novel coronavirus infection in patients aged 12 years and older with a body weight of at least 40 kg, prior to the prescription or at any stage of therapy with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs combined with or without glucocorticoids, by passive immunization with antiviral monoclonal antibody preparations (J06BD) [554]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
It is recommended to administer vaccination with a 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate polysaccharide adsorbed vaccine** containing capsular polysaccharides of 13 pneumococcal serotypes to all patients with juvenile arthritis, prior to the prescription or at any stage of therapy with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs combined with or without glucocorticoids (excluding #rituximab**) in order to prevent pneumococcal infection, increase treatment adherence, and prevent exacerbations in accordance with international guidelines [552,555–558]. (LoE 3, GoR B)
Comments: vaccination with the 13-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine in patients receiving tocilizumab** is carried out 2 weeks before the planned infusion or 2 weeks after; in patients receiving #etanercept** — 1 week before the planned injection or 1 week after; in patients receiving #adalimumab** and #golimumab** — 2 and 4 weeks before the planned injection or 2 and 4 weeks after, respectively; in patients for whom #rituximab** is planned to be prescribed — before the first infusion to prevent infectious complications, increase treatment adherence, and prevent juvenile arthritis exacerbations.
5.2. Follow-up examination of patients with juvenile arthritis in an inpatient/day-care hospital setting who have initiated bDMARD/immunosuppressant therapy.
The examination is performed every 3–6 months: at 3 and 6 months after starting therapy; thereafter every 6 months to monitor the efficacy and safety of therapy, and to detect disease complications and comorbid conditions.
For complaints and anamnesis, see section 2.1.
For physical examination, see section 2.2.
It is recommended to evaluate treatment efficacy and the safety of antirheumatic therapy in all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of juvenile arthritis in a rheumatology inpatient setting, at 3 months after starting therapy; at 6 months after starting therapy; and thereafter every 6 months in order to decide on continuing/modifying the therapy [1,3,32,347,423,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the main treatment goal is to achieve 50% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria at 3 months and the inactive disease stage according to C. Wallace's inactive disease/remission criteria at 6 months.
Monitoring of treatment efficacy — see Appendices G1–G4.
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (CBC) with differential (erythrocyte sedimentation rate determination, erythrocyte count in blood, leukocyte count in blood, platelet count in blood, differential leukocyte count [leukocyte formula], total hemoglobin level determination in blood) in all patients to detect disease activity and monitor the safety of antirheumatic drugs [1,3,32,42,65,430,561]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: parameters of the complete blood count with differential should be within normal limits. Single-, bi-, or pancytopenia may be, among other things, an adverse manifestation of bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant treatment.
Leukopenia most frequently develops during the use of tocilizumab** and #rituximab**, and less frequently during treatment with abatacept**, TNF-alpha inhibitors, methotrexate**, leflunomide**, mycophenolate mofetil** (L04AA06).
Thrombocytopenia may develop during treatment with any bDMARD and immunosuppressant. If there is evidence of recurrent episodes of thrombocytopenia, the bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy is modified.
It is recommended to discontinue bDMARD infusions and/or immunosuppressant injections/administration (for 7 days) in all patients when the platelet count drops to ≤ 150 > 100×109/L, or the neutrophil count drops to < 1.5 ≥ 1.0×109/L in the complete blood count, in order to manage adverse events associated with therapy [1,3,32,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids should be continued. Repeat the complete blood count in 1 week.
It is recommended to withdraw the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD in all patients when the absolute neutrophil count drops to < 1.0×109/L and/or the platelet count drops to < 100×109/L in the complete blood count, in order to prevent the progression of cytopenia [1,3,32,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids should be continued. Repeat the complete blood count in 1 week.
It is recommended to administer the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** (LO3AA) at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously for leukopenia with an absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1.0×109/L for 3–5 days (longer if necessary) until complete normalization of the leukocyte and neutrophil counts [1,3,32,430,517–519]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in children aged < 1 year, #filgrastim** (LO3AA) is prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents
It is recommended to administer the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** (LO3AA) at 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously combined with systemic anti-infective agents (JO1) intravenously for febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) with an absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1.0×109/L [1,3,32,430,517–519]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
In children < 1 year of age, #filgrastim** (LO3AA) is prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Treatment with #filgrastim** (L03AA) is carried out for 3–5 days (or longer if necessary) until complete normalization of leukocyte and neutrophil counts.
It is recommended to continue treatment with systemic anti-infective agents (JO1) in all patients with febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) in order to resolve febrile fever and normalize the leukocyte formula according to complete blood count data [1,3,32,430,517–519]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to resume treatment with the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD at the same dose in all patients after recovery of the neutrophil count to ≥ 1.5×109/L according to complete blood count data in order to maintain systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis remission [1,3,32,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to adjust the therapy with an immunosuppressant and/or biological DMARD in all patients in case of recurrent episodes of decreased blood cell counts in the complete blood count, in order to control adverse events associated with therapy [1,3,32,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe fluconazole** intravenously at 3-12 mg/kg/day depending on the severity and duration of induced neutropenia in patients with neutropenia to prevent fungal infections resulting from treatment with immunosuppressants and/or #rituximab** [1,3,32,430,562]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a blood test for total protein, blood test for albumin, blood test for total bilirubin, blood test for free and conjugated bilirubin, blood test for creatinine, blood test for urea, blood test for uric acid, blood test for glucose, blood test for ferritin, blood test for triglycerides, blood test for cholesterol, blood test for sodium, blood test for potassium, blood test for total calcium, determination of lactate dehydrogenase activity in blood, determination of aspartate aminotransferase activity in blood, determination of alanine aminotransferase activity in blood, determination of gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in blood, determination of alkaline phosphatase activity in blood, blood serum iron test, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol test, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol test in blood, determination of creatine kinase activity in blood, determination of pancreatic amylase activity in blood, and determination of lipase activity in blood in all patients to monitor disease activity, liver, kidney, and pancreatic function, and electrolyte balance during immunosuppressive and/or biological therapy [1,3,32,42,64,65,430,561]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: an increase in creatinine and/or urea, and/or uric acid, and/or total bilirubin, and/or K, and/or cholesterol, and/or triglycerides; an increase in LDH and/or ALT, and/or AST, and/or GGT, and/or ALP, and/or amylase activity may be an adverse manifestation of treatment with NSAIDs and/or immunosuppressants, and/or biologic agents, and/or GCs.
Serum iron during disease remission corresponds to reference values.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue the immunosuppressant and/o biological DMARD if serum ALT and/or AST levels increase ≥ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal and/or total bilirubin, free (unconjugated) and/or conjugated bilirubin, and/or urea, and/or creatinine, and/or uric acid, and/or other biochemical parameter(s) exceed the upper limit of normal in all patients to prevent life-threatening complications [1,3,32,356,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued. Repeat the general biochemical blood test in 1 week.
It is recommended to resume therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biological DMARD in all patients at the same dose after normalization of general clinical blood chemistry parameters in order to maintain JIA remission [1,3,32,213,356,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to adjust the therapy with an immunosuppressant and/or biological DMARD in all patients in the presence of data on repeated episodes of elevated biochemical parameter(s) in order to control adverse events associated with therapy [1,3,32,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to test the serum C-reactive protein level in all patients to monitor the degree of activity of the underlying disease and the development of infectious complications [1,3,32,42,44,68,356,430,561]. (LoE 3, GoR C)
Comments: in the inactive stage of the disease/remission and in the absence of infectious complications, the serum C-reactive protein level corresponds to reference values.
If the serum C-reactive protein level increases, it is necessary to evaluate clinical and other markers of inflammatory activity of JIA; if they are absent, infectious complications and/or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) should be ruled out.
It is recommended to test blood procalcitonin levels in patients with suspected infectious complications to rule out an acute inflammatory response during immunosuppressive and/or biological therapy [1,3,32,150–153,430]. (LoE 3, GoR C)
Comments: an elevated blood procalcitonin level combined with leukocytosis/leukopenia and an elevated serum C-reactive protein level indicates the development of an acute inflammatory response (sepsis). In JIA without infectious complications, it remains within reference values.
It is recommended to perform a set of tests to rule out sepsis: complete blood count (CBC) with differential, general clinical blood chemistry test, serum C-reactive protein test, blood microbiological (culture) test for sterility, microbiological (culture) test of mucus from the tonsils and posterior pharyngeal wall for aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms, microbiological (culture) test of urine for bacterial pathogens using automated seeding with determination of microorganism susceptibility to antimicrobial chemotherapeutic drugs, microbiological (culture) test of anal discharge, thrombelastography, coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis screening); computed tomography of the chest organs, ultrasound examination of the abdominal organs (complex), renal ultrasound, echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal organs, magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic organs, and magnetic resonance imaging of the retroperitoneal space) in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of sepsis in children in patients with febrile, hectic fever, leukocytosis/leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels not associated with JIA activity, in order to rule out sepsis [81,150,151,154–156,207,247,521,563]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
Comments: performed in patients with febrile, hectic fever, leukocytosis/leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels not associated with JIA activity.
It is recommended, upon the development of sepsis, to initially prescribe empirical antibacterial therapy, and subsequently, depending on the clinical situation, intravenous systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) active against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (combinations of penicillins, including combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors (J01CR) and/or 4th generation cephalosporins (J01DE), and/or carbapenems (J01DH), and/or other antibacterial drugs (J01XX), and/or glycopeptide antibiotics (J01XA), and/or other aminoglycosides (J01GB), and/or macrolides (J01FA)) combined with or without systemic antifungal drugs (J02A) based on microflora susceptibility, in combination with normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) at a dose of 400 mg/kg/course (5 days) in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of sepsis in children [81,150,151,154–156,521,522,564]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: off-label systemic antibacterial agents (J01) are prescribed by decision of the medical board, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
Upon the development of sepsis, the administration of biologic agents and injections/intake of immunosuppressants are suspended for the entire duration of antibiotic treatment. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
With increasing JIA activity, pulse therapy with #methylprednisolone** (see above) is performed and/or oral glucocorticoids are prescribed (dose increased) (see JIA treatment).
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue the immunosuppressant and/or biological DMARD and continue previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids for the entire period of etiotropic therapy upon the development of sepsis/infectious complication in order to prevent toxic reactions and the progression of the infectious process [1,3,32,565]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to resume therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biological DMARD no earlier than one week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of sepsis and completion of antibacterial therapy in all patients to maintain JIA remission [1,3,32,213,430,565]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine prothrombin index, test blood soluble fibrin monomer complexes, determine prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, determine activated partial thromboplastin time, determine thrombin time in blood, test blood plasminogen level, test blood fibrinogen level, determine blood D-dimer concentration, test von Willebrand factor activity and properties in blood, and determine antithrombin III activity in blood in patients with signs of vasculitis and/or sepsis and/or MAS in order to assess the state of the hemostatic system [3,32,42,46–49,51,53–55,65,561]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform thromboelastography in patients with signs of vasculitis and/or sepsis, and/or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), signs of hyper- and/or hypocoagulation, and patients receiving antithrombotic agents (B01A) to assess the efficacy of anticoagulant therapy and determine further management strategy [47,50,51,56–59,246,247,563]. (Level of Evidence: 4, Strength of Recommendation: C)
It is recommended to test blood heparin levels in patients with vasculitis to assess the hemostatic system status and the efficacy of anticoagulant therapy [47,50,51,56,57,244,563]. (Level of Evidence: 5, Strength of Recommendation: C)
It is recommended to prescribe/adjust therapy with antithrombotic agents (B01A): heparin group drugs (B01B) or direct factor Xa inhibitors (B01AF); antiplatelet agents excluding heparin (B01AC); antifibrinolytic agents (B02A) in the event of hypercoagulation, coagulopathy, or disseminated intravascular coagulation according to coagulogram data (screening hemostasis test) and thromboelastogram to normalize hemocoagulation [46,47,50,51,57,245,356]. (Level of Evidence: 5, Strength of Recommendation: C)
Comments: off-label use of antithrombotic agents (B01A) is determined by a medical commission decision, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children aged over 15 years.
It is recommended to perform blood transfusion according to indications in patients with consumption coagulopathy/bleeding [3,46,47,150,156,566]. (Level of Evidence: 5, Strength of Recommendation: C)
Comments: in the event of consumption coagulopathy, blood transfusion is performed in the form of transfusion of blood and blood products (B05A): packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, coagulation factor VII, platelet concentrate, etc., according to indications.
It is recommended to determine the blood levels of rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA), and anti-DNA antibodies in all patients to monitor the immunological activity of the disease and adverse events of TNF-alpha inhibitor therapy [1,3,4,32,44,65,66,70,71]. (Level of Evidence: 3, Strength of Recommendation: C)
Comments: an increase in the levels of anti-nuclear antibodies and/xor anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies is observed during TNF-alpha inhibitor treatment and indicates the development of a lupus-like syndrome.
If lupus-like syndrome develops, TNF-alpha inhibitors are discontinued and the patient is switched to a biologic DMARD with a different mechanism of action.
An increase in RF and anti-CCP levels indicates an increase in the immunological activity of the disease.
It is recommended to test blood immunoglobulin levels in all patients to detect secondary immunodeficiency during immunosuppressive and/or biological therapy [1,3,4,32,65,430,567–569]. (Level of Evidence: 5, Strength of Recommendation: C)
Comments: decreased immunoglobulin levels occur in secondary immunodeficiency states, predominantly during treatment with #rituximab** under conditions of B-cell depletion.
It is recommended to prescribe #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) at a dose of 400 mg/kg, or at a dose of 500 mg/kg at least once every 2–4 weeks if adequate blood immunoglobulin levels are not achieved, until blood immunoglobulin levels normalize in case of hypogammaglobulinemia, with the aim of correcting blood immunoglobulin levels and preventing infectious complications during immunodeficiency secondary to immunosuppressive and/or biological therapy [1,3,32,430,567–571]. (Level of Evidence: 5, Strength of Recommendation: C)
It is recommended to skip a scheduled #rituximab** infusion, continue treatment with the immunosuppressant and previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids (GC) in case of decreased blood immunoglobulin levels to manage adverse events associated with the therapy [1,3,32,430,567–571]. (Level of Evidence: 4, Strength of Recommendation: C)
It is recommended to resume #rituximab** infusions after the recovery of blood immunoglobulin levels to maintain juvenile arthritis remission [1,3,32,430,567–571]. (Level of Evidence: 4, Strength of Recommendation: C)
It is recommended to perform lymphocyte subset testing in all patients receiving #rituximab** (L01XC), as well as in patients with frequent viral, purulent bacterial infections, including opportunistic infections, to evaluate the main lymphocyte subpopulations [1,3,32,83,84,112,295–297,417,418,572–574]. (Level of Evidence: 4, Strength of Recommendation: C)
Comments: a decrease in T- and/or B-lymphocyte subpopulations and/or natural killer cells indicates the development of secondary immunodeficiency during treatment with an immunosuppressant and/or biologic agent. Complete depletion of CD19+ B lymphocytes develops during treatment with CD20+ monoclonal antibodies, #rituximab**.
It is recommended to perform quantitative PCR testing for Epstein-Barr virus DNA in peripheral and cord blood, qualitative PCR testing for Epstein-Barr virus DNA in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative PCR testing for Epstein-Barr virus DNA in urine in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography, to identify active Epstein-Barr virus infection as an infectious complication developing against the background of treatment with immunosuppressants and/or biologic agents combined with (or without) glucocorticoids, and to address the issue of etiotropic therapy [1,3,32,81,113–118,299,575]. (Level of Evidence: 4, Strength of Recommendation: C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative PCR testing for cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus) DNA in peripheral and cord blood, qualitative PCR testing for cytomegalovirus DNA in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative PCR testing for cytomegalovirus DNA in urine in patients with clinical manifestations of cytomegalovirus infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography, to identify active cytomegalovirus infection as an infectious complication developing against the background of treatment with immunosuppressants and/or biologic agents combined with (or without) glucocorticoids, and to address the issue of etiotropic therapy [1,3,32,115,116,119–122]. (Level of Evidence: 4, Strength of Recommendation: C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative PCR testing for herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA in blood, qualitative PCR testing for herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative PCR testing for herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in urine in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography, to identify active herpetic infection as an infectious complication developing against the background of treatment with immunosuppressants and/or biologic agents combined with (or without) glucocorticoids, and to address the issue of etiotropic therapy [1,3,32,115,116,119,123,576]. (Level of Evidence: 4, Strength of Recommendation: C)
It is recommended to determine blood antibodies of classes M and G (IgM, IgG) to cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus) in patients with clinical manifestations of cytomegalovirus infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography, to identify active cytomegalovirus infection as an infectious complication developing against the background of treatment with immunosuppressants and/or biologic agents combined with (or without) glucocorticoids, and to address the issue of etiotropic therapy [1,115,119,121,122,124,125]. (Level of Evidence: 4, Strength of Recommendation: C)
It is recommended to determine blood antibodies of classes M and G (IgM, IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography, to identify active Epstein-Barr virus infection as an infectious complication developing against the background of treatment with immunosuppressants and/or biologic agents combined with (or without) glucocorticoids, and to address the issue of etiotropic therapy [3,32,113,115,119,126]. (Level of Evidence: 4, Strength of Recommendation: C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to the capsid antigen (VCA) of Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood of patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography, to identify active Epstein-Barr virus infection as an infectious complication developing against the background of treatment with immunosuppressants and/or biologic agents combined with (or without) glucocorticoids, and to address the issue of etiotropic therapy [3,32,113,115,119,126]. (Level of Evidence: 5, Strength of Recommendation: C)
It is recommended to determine class G antibodies (IgG) to early proteins (EA) of Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or with fever, and/or upon detection of interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to detect active Epstein-Barr virus infection as an infectious complication that developed during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs combined with (or without) GCs and to address the issue of etiotropic therapy [3,32,113,115,119,126]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Herpes simplex virus in the blood of patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection and/or with fever, and/or upon detection of interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs according to computed tomography of the chest organs in order to detect active herpetic infection as an infectious complication that developed during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs combined with (or without) GCs and to address the issue of etiotropic therapy [1,3,32,81,115,119,127,128,130,577]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe #acyclovir** (JO5AB) at a dose of 200 mg orally 5 times a day (not exceeding 1000 mg/day) for children older than 2 years or at a dose of 5–10 mg/kg/infusion intravenously every 8 hours in the event of local herpetic infection; prescribing #acyclovir** at a dose of 10 mg/kg/infusion intravenously every 8 hours in children aged < 1 year; at a dose of 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 8 hours in children aged ≥ 1 year in the event of Herpes zoster in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of herpesvirus infections in children, including those with immunocompromised status [3,32,213,503,504,507,508]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #acyclovir** (JO5AB) in children aged < 3 years is prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed parental consent.
Treatment with #acyclovir** is carried out for 7–10 days until the complete resolution of herpetic eruptions.
It is recommended to prescribe #ganciclovir** (JO5AB) at a dose of 6 mg/kg/infusion intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days in the event of cytomegalovirus infection or #ganciclovir** (JO5AB) at a dose of 10 mg/kg/infusion intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days in the event of Epstein-Barr virus infection in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of immunocompromised children [3,32,508,510–512]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #ganciclovir** (JO5AB) in children aged < 12 years is prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed parental consent and approval from the local ethics committee of the medical organization.
It is recommended to temporarily withdraw the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD in all patients upon the development of infection caused by herpes viruses [1,3,32,430,565,578]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Administration of immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs is discontinued for the duration of antiviral therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
It is recommended to resume therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD in all patients no earlier than 1 week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of infection and the completion of antiviral therapy [1,3,32,213,430,565,574,578,579]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to screen for the presence/absence of tuberculosis (focal tuberculin skin test, test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen in standard dilution**, blood interferon-gamma release assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, computed tomography of the chest organs) in all patients receiving bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants combined with (or without) GCs at least twice a year [1,3,32,88,90,91,91,94,212,213,430,580]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to withdraw the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD in all patients with a detected positive intradermal tuberculin test (papule > 5 mm) and/or elevated interferon-gamma levels, and/or lung lesions, and/or intrathoracic lymphadenopathy [1,3,32,88,90,91,91,94,212,213,430,580]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
It is recommended to conduct an initial medical appointment (examination, consultation) by a phthisiatrician for all patients with a positive focal tuberculin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculosis allergen, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or lung lesions and/or intrathoracic lymphadenopathy in order to address the issue of further examination and specific therapy [1,3,32,88,90,91,212,213,422,430,580,581]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: if a tuberculous infection without a focus is detected, specific anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy is administered for 3–6 months (as decided by the phthisiatrician). Treatment with the immunosuppressant is continued under the supervision of a rheumatologist, complete blood count (CBC), and general biochemical blood tests; the issue of continuing bDMARD therapy is decided on an individual basis.
It is recommended to prescribe GCs orally to all patients upon the development of a juvenile arthritis flare during specific anti-tuberculosis therapy in order to maintain juvenile arthritis remission [1,3,32,88,90,91,212,213,430,580,581]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the issue of resuming and selecting bDMARDs and/or an immunosuppressant is resolved after the completion of specific chemotherapy and a consultation with a phthisiatrician.
It is recommended to resume therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD in all patients after completing specific anti-tuberculosis therapy and consulting a phthisiatrician [1,3,32,88,90,91,212,580]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the issue of continuing bDMARD therapy is decided on an individual basis.
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Salmonella enterica in the blood, determine antibodies to Salmonella typhi in the blood, determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in the blood, and determine antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica serovars in the blood in all patients in order to detect infection with enteric bacteria that developed during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs combined with (or without) GCs [1,3,32,124,582–589]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella boydii in the blood, determine antibody classes to Shigella dysenteriae in the blood, determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella sonnei in the blood, and determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella flexneri in the blood in all patients in order to detect infection with enteric bacteria that developed during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs combined with (or without) GCs [1,3,32,124,582–589]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform etiotropic therapy upon the detection of class A and M antibodies in diagnostic titer, as well as high-titer class G antibodies to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, Yersinia enterocolitica serovars, Salmonella enterica, Salmonella typhi, Shigella boydii, Shigella dysenteriae, Shigella sonnei, and Shigella flexneri in the blood in accordance with clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of intestinal infections in children [1,3,32,124,582–589]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Administration of bDMARDs and injections/intake of immunosuppressants are discontinued for the entire period of systemic antibacterial drug therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
Treatment with bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants is resumed no earlier than 1 week after the decrease in laboratory markers of infection and completion of antibacterial therapy.
It is recommended to determine class A, M, and G antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci in the blood; determine antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in the blood; determine antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae in the blood, and determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the blood in all patients in order to detect mycoplasma and chlamydial infection that developed during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs combined with (or without) GCs [1,3,32,95,582,585–590]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform etiotropic therapy upon the detection of class A and M antibodies in diagnostic titer, as well as high-titer class G antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydia psittaci, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae in the blood in all patients in accordance with clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of mycoplasma and chlamydial infection in children [1,3,32,95,582,585–590]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Administration of bDMARDs and injections/intake of immunosuppressants are discontinued for the entire period of systemic antibacterial drug therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
Treatment with bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants is resumed no earlier than 1 week after the decrease in laboratory markers of infection and completion of antibacterial therapy.
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) examination of mucus from the tonsils and posterior pharyngeal wall for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms in all patients to detect nasopharyngeal contamination by pathogenic or opportunistic microorganisms that developed during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs combined with GCs [1,32,81,95,3,157,158,585–589]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: if nasopharyngeal contamination by pathogenic and/or opportunistic microorganisms is detected, an appointment (examination, consultation) with an otolaryngologist is performed to address the issue of sanitization.
In the absence of clinical manifestations, bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy is not discontinued.
If inflammatory changes in the nasopharynx are present, antibacterial therapy is administered. bDMARD treatment and immunosuppressant injections/intake are suspended for the duration of antiviral therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued. Treatment with bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants is resumed no earlier than 1 week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of infection and completion of antiviral therapy.
It is recommended to perform a routine (clinical) urinalysis and urine test by Nechiporenko method in all patients to monitor renal function [1,3,4,32,65,159]. (Levele of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: the presence of isolated microhematuria may be an adverse event of NSAID and/or methotrexate** therapy.
If persistent microhematuria develops, methotrexate** is discontinued. Administration of biologic DMARDs should be continued, and immunosuppressive therapy is adjusted.
The presence of proteinuria may indicate the development of secondary renal amyloidosis.
It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram (ECG) in all patients to monitor cardiac function [1,3,32,34]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: performed in all patients. In patients with juvenile arthritis in remission, no pathological changes are detected on ECG
It is recommended to perform 24-hour Holter monitoring in patients with arrhythmia or pathological ECG findings to determine the type of arrhythmia [1,3,32,34,315,317,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with arterial hypertension to detect blood pressure deviations from the norm and develop an antihypertensive treatment strategy [1,3,32,34,317,430,591]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive ultrasound examination of internal organs (including comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and renal ultrasound) in all patients to detect/rule out pathological changes [1,3,32,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: performed in all patients. Examination may reveal: mild hepatomegaly, biliary dyskinesia, reactive changes in the pancreas, gallbladder wall thickening, gastric and intestinal wall thickening. All changes may be associated with adverse events of NSAID and/or glucocorticoid, and/or immunosuppressive therapy.
It is recommended to perform echocardiography in all patients to monitor cardiac function and detect myocardial, pericardial, or endocardial involvement [1,3,32,34]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: performed in all patients. In patients with juvenile arthritis in remission, no pathological changes are detected on echocardiography.
It is recommended to perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving NSAIDs (M01A) and/or glucocorticoids (H02AB), and in patients with dyspeptic symptoms to rule out upper gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases associated with the underlying disease and/or Helicobacter pylori and/or the use of NSAIDs and/or glucocorticoids [3,32,160,161,183–191]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of gastric mucosal biopsies for *Helicobacter pylori* in patients with inflammatory and/or erosive and/or ulcerative changes according to esophagogastroduodenoscopy, in order to rule out GI pathology associated with *Helicobacter pylori* [3,32,160,161,184–188,190–193]. (Reliability Level of Evidence 4, Recommendation Grade C)
It is recommended to prescribe drugs for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease (A02B) when reflux disease and/or inflammatory gastropathy, erosive and/or ulcerative processes in the esophagus and/or stomach, and/or duodenum are detected by esophagogastroduodenoscopy, in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of inflammatory gastropathy and gastroesophageal reflux disease in children and international guidelines [3,32,184]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: for the duration of anti-inflammatory therapy, administration of bDMARDs and/re-injections/intake of immunosuppressants are suspended; previously prescribed GCs should be continued.
Resumption of treatment with biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants is carried out after the end of anti-inflammatory therapy.
It is recommended to perform eradication therapy including proton pump inhibitors (A02BC), systemic antibacterial drugs (J01), and bismuth tripotassium dicitrate** at a dose of 8 mg/kg/day in 1–2 doses (for patients aged 4 to 8 years) for 4–8 weeks, at a dose of 120 mg twice daily (for patients aged 8 to 12 years), or at a dose of 120 mg 4 times daily or 240 mg twice daily (for patients older than 12 years) in cases of inflammatory gastropathy, erosive and/or ulcerative processes in the stomach and/or duodenum associated with Helicobacter pylori, in accordance with clinical guidelines [184,187,188]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: eradication therapy outside of approved age indications is prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children aged ≥ 15 years.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs in all patients during eradication therapy [1,3,32,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: previously prescribed glucocorticoids should be continued. Resumption of treatment with immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs is carried out after the end of eradication therapy.
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging of a joint (single joint) with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients to monitor therapy efficacy [1,3,32,166,170,318,319]. (Level of Evidence 1, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the chest organs in all patients with anesthesia (including early postoperative management) to monitor the infection safety of antirheumatic therapy and rule out pneumonia and tuberculosis [32,88,90,200,201,212]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: during treatment with biologic DMARDs, especially in combination with immunosuppressants and glucocorticoids, pneumonia (interstitial, focal, lobar, polysegmental) may develop.
Interstitial pneumonia most commonly develops during treatment with #rituximab**, less commonly with tocilizumab**, and extremely rarely with TNF-alpha inhibitors and abatacept**.
Interstitial pneumonia should be suspected if low-grade/high-grade fever, dry cough/cough with a small amount of sputum, dyspnea, crackles/decreased breath sounds on auscultation appear.
Focal or lobar pneumonia develops more frequently during treatment with tocilizumab** and TNF-alpha inhibitors, and less frequently with #rituximab** and abatacept**.
Pneumonia developing during treatment with tocilizumab** or, less commonly, TNF-alpha inhibitors is characterized by low-grade fever or its complete absence, sparse clinical presentation, and no elevation of acute-phase inflammatory markers: ESR, blood leukocyte count, and serum C-reactive protein level.
Focal pneumonia should be suspected if dry/wet cough or throat clearing appears.
It is recommended to perform bronchoscopy with anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes detected on chest computed tomography to obtain bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and analyze it [90,124,212,267,270,271,273,300,313,314]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) testing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis carinii cysts in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes detected on chest computed tomography to confirm/rule out pneumocystis etiology of pneumonia and decide on etiotropic therapy [267,270–273,276,277,279,280,301–303]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative PCR detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in sputum, endotracheal aspirate, or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes detected on chest computed tomography to confirm/rule out pneumocystis etiology of pneumonia and decide on etiotropic therapy [112,270–273,276–278,301–304]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to determine blood class M and G antibodies to Pneumocystis jirovecii in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes detected on chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on etiotropic therapy [112,270–273,276–278,301–304,592]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) testing of sputum for fungi (yeasts and molds) in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes detected on chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on etiotropic therapy [124,267,270–273,313,314]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) testing of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeasts and molds) in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes detected on chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on etiotropic therapy [124,267,270–273,313,314]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) testing of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes detected on chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on etiotropic therapy [124,267,270–273,313,314]. (Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to fungi of the genus Aspergillus (Aspergillus spp.) in the blood of all patients with interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs according to computed tomography of the chest cavity in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and resolve the issue of etiotropic therapy [124,270–273,282,313,314,593,594]. (CLE 3, LEV C)
It is recommended to determine mannan and galactomannan in lavage fluid and blood in all patients with interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs according to computed tomography of the chest cavity in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and resolve the issue of etiotropic therapy [124,270–273,282,313,314,593,594]. (CLE 3, LEV B)
It is recommended to determine Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR in all patients with interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs according to computed tomography of the chest cavity in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and resolve the issue of etiotropic therapy [256–259,267,270,271,273]. (CLE 4, LEV C)
It is recommended to determine Cytomegalovirus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR in all patients with interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs according to computed tomography of the chest cavity in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and resolve the issue of etiotropic therapy [116,124,267,270,271,311]. (CLE 5, LEV C)
It is recommended to determine Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG) DNA with species differentiation in sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, or bronchial washings by PCR in all patients with interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs according to computed tomography of the chest cavity in order to identify the etiology of pneumonia and resolve the issue of etiotropic therapy [90,112,124,212,267,270,271,305–310,595]. (CLE 4, LEV C)
It is recommended to prescribe empirical antibacterial therapy: #cotrimoxazole** (J01EE) in combination with systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) active against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (J01CR) and/or 4th generation cephalosporins (J01DE), and/or carbapenems (J01DH), and/or other antibacterial drugs (J01X)) combined with systemic antifungals (J02A) and systemic antivirals (J05) before identifying the etiological factor of interstitial pneumonia, depending on the clinical situation, in accordance with the guidelines for the treatment of pneumonia in immunocompromised children in order to prevent the progression of the infectious process [150,151,276,303,521,585–589,596–598]. (CLE 5, LEV C)
Comments: systemic antibacterial drugs (J01), systemic antifungals (J02A), and systemic antivirals (J05) used off-label regarding age are prescribed by decision of the medical commission after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
The administration of biologic DMARDs and injections/administration of immunosuppressants are suspended for the duration of antibacterial therapy. Previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids should be continued. If signs of respiratory failure appear, the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit;
Treatment with tbDMARDs and immunosuppressants should be resumed no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of pneumonia according to laboratory tests, follow-up computed tomography of the chest with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy; prescription/adjustment of tbDMARDs is carried out after resolution of clinical, radiological, and laboratory signs of interstitial pneumonia.
It is recommended to prescribe targeted antibacterial therapy: #cotrimoxazole** (J01EE) in combination with systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) active against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (J01CR) and/or 4th generation cephalosporins (J01DE), and/or carbapenems (J01DH), and/or other antibacterial drugs (J01X)) combined with systemic antifungals (J02A) and systemic antivirals (J05) upon confirmation of the etiological factor of pneumonia, depending on the clinical situation, in accordance with the guidelines for the treatment of pneumonia in immunocompromised children in order to prevent the progression of the infectious process [150,151,276,303,521,585–589,596–598]. (CLE 5, LEV C)
It is recommended to prescribe intravenous glucocorticoids and #cotrimoxazole** (J01EE) at a dose of 3.75–5.0 mg/kg body weight/administration (15–20 mg/kg/day) (calculated as trimethoprim) intravenously every 8 hours for moderate Pneumocystis pneumonia, or at a dose of 3.75–5.0 mg/kg body weight/administration (15–20 mg/kg/day) (calculated as trimethoprim) intravenously every 6–8 hours for severe Pneumocystis pneumonia, in accordance with international guidelines for the treatment of immunocompromised children [3,32,276,303]. (CLE 5, LEV C)
Comments: #cotrimoxazole** (J01EE) used off-label regarding age is prescribed by decision of the medical commission after obtaining informed consent from the parents. If signs of respiratory failure appear, the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit. Administration of biologic DMARDs and injections/administration of immunosuppressants are discontinued during antibacterial therapy. Previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids should be continued. Treatment with biologic DMARDs and immunosuppressants is resumed no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of pneumonia according to laboratory tests, follow-up computed tomography of the chest cavity with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy; prescription/adjustment of biologic DMARDs is carried out after the resolution of clinical, radiological, and laboratory signs of interstitial pneumonia.
It is recommended to prescribe #voriconazole** at a dose of 6 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for the first 24 hours and 4 mg/kg starting from the second day, in accordance with international guidelines for the treatment of immunocompromised children, upon detection of galactomannan in lavage fluid and/or blood, and/or antibodies to fungi of the genus Aspergillus (Aspergillus spp.) in blood [594,598]. (CLE 5, LEV C)
Comments: Administration of tbDMARDs and injections/intake of immunosuppressants are discontinued during antibacterial therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued. If signs of respiratory failure appear, the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit. Treatment with tbDMARDs and immunosuppressants is resumed no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of pneumonia according to laboratory tests, follow-up computed tomography of the chest with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy; prescription/adjustment of tbDMARDs is carried out after resolution of clinical, radiological, and laboratory signs of interstitial pneumonia.
It is recommended to prescribe fluconazole** intravenously at a dose of 6–12 mg/kg/day in accordance with international guidelines for the treatment of immunocompromised children upon detection of mannan in lavage fluid and/or blood [1,3,32,562]. (CLE 4, LEV C)
Comments: Administration of tbDMARDs and injections/intake of immunosuppressants are discontinued during antibacterial therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued. If signs of respiratory failure appear, the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit. Treatment with tbDMARDs and immunosuppressants is resumed no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of pneumonia according to laboratory tests, follow-up computed tomography of the chest with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy; prescription/adjustment of tbDMARDs is carried out after resolution of clinical, radiological, and laboratory signs of interstitial pneumonia.
It is recommended to prescribe systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) active against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (J01CR) and/or 4th generation cephalosporins (J01DE), and/or carbapenems (J01DH), and/or other antibacterial drugs (J01X)) combined with systemic antifungals (J02A) in case of focal, lobar, or polysegmental pneumonia in accordance with the clinical guidelines for the treatment of pneumonia in immunocompromised children in order to resolve pneumonia [3,112,150,151,276,303,521,585–589,596–600]. (CLE 5, LEV C)
Comments: systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) used off-label regarding age are prescribed by decision of the medical commission after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD therapy in all patients, while continuing previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids, upon suspicion/development of pneumonia and for the entire duration of etiotropic therapy in order to prevent toxic reactions and the progression of the infectious process [1,3,32,45,430,574,579]. (CLE 5, LEV C)
It is recommended to resume immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD therapy in all patients no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of pneumonia according to laboratory tests, follow-up computed tomography of the chest cavity with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy in order to prevent an increase in disease activity/maintain disease remission [1,3,32,45,213,430,574,579]. (CLE 5, LEV C)
Comments: therapy is prescribed/adjusted after the resolution of clinical, radiological, and laboratory signs of interstitial pneumonia.
It is recommended to perform radiography of the temporomandibular joint and/or radiography of the intervertebral joints, and/or radiography of the elbow joint, and/or radiography of the wrist joint, and/or radiography of the knee joint, and/or radiography of the shoulder joint, and/or radiography of the hip joint, and/or radiography of the ankle joint, and/or radiography of the acromioclavicular joint, and/or radiography of the sternoclavicular joint, and/or radiography of the hand and/or radiography of the foot in two projections, or computed tomography of the joint with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in all patients with a history of active arthritis to determine the degree of osteocartilaginous destruction [1,3,32,163,167]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: performed no more than once every 12 months, or earlier if indicated.
It is recommended to perform X-ray densitometry in all patients receiving or having received glucocorticoids to detect osteopenia/osteoporosis [327,328]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to prescribe calcium preparations (A12A) and vitamin D and its analogues (A11CC) to patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis in accordance with clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of secondary osteoporosis in children to prevent the progression of osteoporosis and the development of its complications [327,328,528,601]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to prescribe #pamidronic acid or #alendronic acid**, or #zoledronic acid**, or #ibandronic acid to patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis for the treatment of osteoporosis [328,512,602–605]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: bisphosphonates (M05BA) are prescribed for life-saving indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents and children aged ≥ 15 years.
The following regimens for prescribing bisphosphonates (M05BA) are recommended:
— #pamidronic acid (maximum dose 60 mg/infusion) [602]:
for patients < 1 year at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg IV every 2 months,
in patients aged 1–2 years at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 3 months,
in patients aged 2–3 years at a dose of 0.375–0.75 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 3 months,
in patients older than 3 years at a dose of 0.5–1 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 4 months.
— or #alendronic acid** (maximum dose 70 mg/week) [602]:
at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg/week orally,
for patients with body weight < 40 kg at a dose of 5 mg/day or 35 mg/week,
for patients with body weight > 40 kg at a dose of 10 mg/day or 70 mg/week.
— or #zoledronic acid** at a dose of 0.0125–0.05 mg/kg/infusion IV every 6–12 months (maximum dose 4 mg) [602];
— or #ibandronic acid:
at a dose of 3 mg/infusion IV once every 3 months [603]
or 150 mg orally once a month [604]
to patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis for the treatment of osteoporosis [328,512,602–605]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: bisphosphonates (M05BA) are prescribed for life-saving indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents and children aged ≥ 15 years.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by an otorhinolaryngologist in all patients to identify foci of chronic infection of the ENT organs and address the issue of their sanitation for the prevention of infectious conditions under treatment with immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs combined (or not) with glucocorticoids; to assess the efficacy of ENT organ sanitation in patients who have undergone it [1,3,32,45,95,329,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a pediatric dentist in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs combined (or not) with glucocorticoids, to determine the state of the oral cavity, resolve the issue of its sanitation or assess its efficacy [1,3,32,45,330,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by an ophthalmologist with mandatory biomicroscopy of the eye in all patients to rule out uveitis, as well as in patients receiving glucocorticoids to rule out complicated cataract [1,3,4,15,32,45,332,333,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: children at high risk for developing uveitis (patients with RF-negative oligo- or polyarthritis, positive ANA, juvenile ankylosing spondylitis, disease onset before 7 years of age, and disease duration under 4 years) must be examined by an ophthalmologist at least once every 3 months.
Children at moderate and low risk of developing uveitis (RF-positive oligo- and polyarthritis with negative ANA, onset after 7 years of age, and disease duration of more than 4 years) must be examined by an ophthalmologist at least once every 6 months.
During uveitis therapy, including local agents – examination by an ophthalmologist at least once a month.
In patients with complicated cataract, treatment efficacy is monitored and the need for surgical treatment is determined.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a pediatric cardiologist in patients with cardiac dysfunction and/or arterial hypertension to address the issue of cardiotropic and/or antihypertensive therapy [3,4,34,45,334,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a phthisiatrician in all patients with a positive focal tuberculin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculosis allergen, and/or elevated interferon-gamma levels in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens in the blood, and/or focal or infiltrative lung changes to address the issue of chemoprophylaxis or antituberculosis chemotherapy [1,3,4,45,45,86,88,91,92,213,580,581]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a pediatric endocrinologist in patients with endocrinological pathology, including those receiving glucocorticoids, to monitor treatment efficacy [1,3,4,32,327,328,335,336]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a dietitian in patients with underweight, amyotrophy, osteopenia/osteoporosis, constitutional obesity and Cushing's syndrome, steroid diabetes to develop an individual dietary program and recommendations for eating behavior in outpatient settings [1,3,32,45,340,341,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a traumatologist-orthopedist in all patients with functional joint insufficiency, bone length growth disorders, subluxations, back pain, to address the issue of reconstructive surgery and joint replacement [1,3,32,45,214,430,525]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, check-up) by a neurologist in all patients with neurological symptoms, psychomotor developmental delay, psychotic reactions to address the issue of therapy [1,3,4,32,45,216,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a follow-up consultation (examination, check-up) by a neurologist in all patients with neurological symptoms, psychomotor developmental delay, psychotic reactions to assess the efficacy of the therapy administered [1,3,4,32,45,216,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (testing, check-up) by a medical psychologist in all patients aged 1 year and older and their parents to harmonize the process of child personality formation under conditions of a severe chronic disease and optimize child-parent relationships; to increase treatment adherence and cooperation with the physician and medical personnel to achieve disease remission and psychological adaptation in society [1,3,32,221–227,338,430]. (Level of Evidence 2, Grade of Recommendation A)
It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by a physical therapy physician in all patients with functional insufficiency to develop a physiotherapy program within the individual rehabilitation program [1,3,32,337,430,529–531,606]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a follow-up examination (consultation) by a physical therapy physician in patients after completing the physiotherapy program to assess its efficacy [1,3,32,48,337,430,529,530,606]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a consultation (examination, check-up) by an exercise therapy physician in all patients with functional insufficiency to develop an exercise therapy set within the individual rehabilitation program [1,3,32,337,430,529–531,607]. (Level of Evidence 1, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to provide medical rehabilitation to all patients with functional insufficiency to restore functional capacity [1,3,32,337,430,529–541]. (Level of Evidence 2, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to perform a follow-up consultation (examination, check-up) by an exercise therapy physician in all patients with functional insufficiency after completion of the rehabilitation program to assess its efficacy [1,3,32,337,430,529–531,607]. (Level of Evidence 1, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-intensivist in patients scheduled for procedures under general anesthesia, to assess their condition [60,61,218–220]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to adjust anti-rheumatic therapy in the inpatient rheumatology department that initiated treatment with a biologic DMARD and/or immunosuppressant if the inactive disease stage is not achieved at 6 months, remission at 12 months, and further every 6 months [1,3,32,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Monitoring of treatment efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4
It is recommended to adjust anti-rheumatic therapy in the inpatient rheumatology department that initiated treatment with a targeted biologic and/or immunosuppressant at any stage of treatment if adverse events develop during therapy with a targeted biologic and/or immunosuppressant [1,3,32,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
5.2.1. Oncological alertness in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis receiving bDMARDs/immunosuppressants
Considering that one of the adverse effects of bDMARD therapy is oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases, it is essential to maintain oncological alertness at any stage of treatment (both in inpatient settings and during follow-up dispensary observation).
It is recommended to maintain oncological alertness due to the potential development of oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases during targeted biologic therapy at any stage of treatment [3,32,81,168,169,204–208,608]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to immediately discontinue the immunosuppressant/targeted biologic and hospitalize the patient if an oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative disease is suspected, in order to perform appropriate investigations [3,32,81,168,169,204–208,608]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to obtain a bone marrow cytologic specimen using anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) via puncture, along with a bone marrow histologic specimen with cytologic examination of a bone marrow smear (myelogram) and pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods, in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases/metastatic bone marrow involvement [3,32,81,168,169,204–208,608]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a lymph node biopsy (peripheral, or intra-abdominal/intrathoracic as indicated) using anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) with cytologic examination of the lymph node tissue specimen and pathomorphological examination of the lymph node biopsy (surgical) material in patients with marked enlargement of peripheral and/or intrathoracic and/or intra-abdominal lymph nodes who are receiving an immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic and present with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases/metastatic lymph node involvement [3,32,81,168,169,204–208,608]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal organs, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the retroperitoneal space, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic organs, with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases [3,32,81,168,169,204–208,608]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the chest organs with intravenous bolus injection, with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out pulmonary metastases/mediastinal organ involvement in oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases [3,32,81,168,169,204–208,608]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of bone tissue (one region) and magnetic resonance imaging of joints (one joint), with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out oncological/onco-hematological diseases [3,32,81,168,169,204–208,608]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the bone and computed tomography of the joint, with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic who have bone destruction foci that are atypical for juvenile arthritis, in order to rule out oncological/onco-hematological diseases [3,32,81,168,169,204–208,608]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)), with contrast enhancement, and if necessary, whole-body positron emission tomography with tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)), with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic who present with severe arthralgia, myalgia, ossalgia, bone destruction changes, subcutaneous fat infiltrates, or lesions in parenchymal organs, the brain, or spinal cord, in order to rule out oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases [1,3,32,168,210]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform multi-position bone scintigraphy, with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic who have bone destruction foci atypical for juvenile arthritis, in order to rule out malignant neoplasms/metastatic bone involvement [1,3,32,168,169,210]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform CT-guided trephine bone biopsy of the pelvis with anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), including pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods; cytologic examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; immunocytochemical examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; and immunophenotyping of hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow, in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out hemoblastoses/lymphoproliferative diseases/metastatic bone marrow involvement [3,32,81,168,169,204–208,608]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a bone biopsy with anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) and pathomorphological examination of bone tissue biopsy (surgical) material in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic who have bone destruction foci atypical for juvenile arthritis, in order to rule out malignant neoplasms/metastatic bone involvement [3,32,81,168,169,204–208,608]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended that patients in whom an oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative disease or metastatic involvement is suspected or detected based on examination results undergo an initial consultation (examination) by a pediatric oncologist to decide on transferring the child to a specialized facility for further evaluation and treatment [3,32,81,168,169,204–208,608]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
5.3. Follow-up evaluation as part of dispensary observation in outpatient and polyclinic settings
It is recommended that all patients with juvenile arthritis undergo an initial consultation (examination) by a rheumatologist with an evaluation of the efficacy and safety of therapy [1,3,32,430].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended that all patients undergo a follow-up consultation (examination) by a rheumatologist (with an evaluation of therapy efficacy and safety at least once a month after initiation/adjustment of therapy and at least once every 3 months after achieving disease remission; assessing the need for referral for unplanned hospitalization to the inpatient rheumatology department that initiated therapy with a targeted biologic and/or immunosuppressant at any stage of treatment if exacerbation/complications, comorbidities, complications/side effects, or persistent intolerance to therapy develop; providing referrals for planned hospitalization to the inpatient rheumatology department that initiated therapy with a targeted biologic and/or immunosuppressant at 3 and 6 months after prescription/adjustment of therapy and every 6 months thereafter; and conducting remote consultations with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated therapy, for all patients who develop any signs of inefficacy and/or intolerance to therapy) [1,3,32,430]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended that all patients undergo a consultation (examination) by a pediatrician to ensure continuity of care and referral for medical and social expertise [1,3,32,430, 618]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to schedule a follow-up outpatient appointment (examination, consultation) with a pediatrician or a district pediatrician for patients with juvenile arthritis in the absence of a rheumatologist at the patient's place of residence at least once a month after initiation/adjustment of therapy, and at least once every 3 months after achieving disease remission, in order to organize follow-up care and evaluate the efficacy and safety of therapy [1,3,32,430, 618]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in accordance with the procedure for dispensary monitoring of children with rheumatic diseases, if a pediatric rheumatologist is not available at the patient's place of residence, dispensary monitoring is carried out by the district pediatrician, pediatrician, or general practitioner (family physician) of the medical organization.
It is recommended to switch initially prescribed immunosuppressants and/or selective immunosuppressants to generics, and/or biologic DMARDs to biosimilars, exclusively upon proven therapeutic efficacy and safety of the generic or biosimilar in the pediatric patient population with a similar nosological form [342–344]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: currently, biosimilars of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) agents, as well as generics of Janus kinase inhibitors, which are structurally equivalent to them, have been approved. Some of these drugs have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials in adult patients similar to that of the original drugs [345].
Clinical trials of biosimilars and generics of immunosuppressants and selective immunosuppressants have not been conducted in the pediatric population with juvenile arthritis.
The indication for use in children and adolescents with juvenile arthritis aged 2 to 17 years and with a body weight of less than 62.5 kg applies only to the medicinal product etanercept "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection". The medicinal product etanercept "solution for subcutaneous injection" has a contraindication for use in children under 12 years of age and with a body weight of less than 62.5 kg [408–411].
According to the FAS clarification letter No. ТН/109573/21 dated December 22, 2021, and the medical instructions for the use of the medicinal product Etanercept [412]:
the use of the dosage form "solution for subcutaneous injection" instead of "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection" in children under 12 years of age and body mass less than 62.5 kg is not recognized as acceptable due to differences in the final concentration of solutions and the lack of studies allowing to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the 50 mg/ml solution in children. Thus, the substitution of the dosage form "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection" in this patient is impossible.
The original immunosuppressant and/or selective immunosuppressant, and/or biologic DMARD cannot be automatically replaced with a generic or biosimilar. Drug substitution may only be carried out based on a consensus of the attending physician who initiated therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or selective immunosuppressant, and/or biologic DMARD, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
Automatic replacement of the initially prescribed immunosuppressant and/or selective immunosuppressant, and/or biologic DMARD may lead to a loss of therapeutic effect and the development of adverse events [342–344].
It is recommended to immediately discontinue the infusion/injection of a biologic DMARD and/or the injection/administration of an immunosuppressant if an allergic reaction of any severity develops [1,3,32,430,609]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
Comments: an allergic reaction may occur at any stage of treatment with a biologic DMARD and/or immunosuppressant.
It is recommended to prescribe systemic antihistamines and/or GCs in the event of an allergic reaction to the administration of a biologic DMARD and/or immunosuppressant [1,3,32,430,609]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
Comments: the choice of drug and its route of administration depend on the severity of the allergic reaction.
It is recommended to have an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote) with a hospital rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, in the event of an allergic reaction to the administration and/or infusion of a biologic DMARD and/or immunosuppressant, in order to decide on the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out [1,3,32,430,609]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an emergency hospitalization in the event of an allergic reaction to the administration and/or infusion of a biologic DMARD and/or immunosuppressant in order to decide on the need for therapy adjustment [1,3,32,430,609]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, red blood cell count, white blood cell count, platelet count, differential white blood cell count [leukocyte formula], and total hemoglobin level) in all patients at least once every 2–4 weeks to monitor disease activity and bone marrow-related adverse effects of antirheumatic drugs [1,3,32]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to discontinue the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD, while continuing the previously prescribed oral GCs if the platelet count decreases to ≤ 150 > 100×109/L and the neutrophil count decreases to < 1.5 ≥ 1.0×109/L according to the complete blood count with differential, in order to prevent the development of infectious complications [1,3,32,574,579]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: repeat the complete blood count with differential in one week.
It is recommended to prescribe the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** (L03AA) at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously if the leukocyte count drops with an absolute neutrophil count of < 1.0×109/L for 3–5 days (longer if necessary) in order to normalize the blood leukocyte count [1,3,32,430,517–519]. (Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: for children aged < 1 year, #filgrastim**(L03AA) is prescribed by decision of a medical commission, following receipt of informed consent from the parents and approval by the local ethics committee of the medical organization.
Neutropenia is more commonly observed with the use of #rituximab** and tocilizumab**, less frequently with abatacept**, TNF-alpha inhibitors, and immunosuppressants.
It is recommended to prescribe the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** (LO3AA) at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously, arrange urgent hospitalization to a local inpatient facility, and administer systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) intravenously in the event of febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) with an absolute neutrophil count < 1.0×109/L in order to normalize blood leukocyte counts and prevent the development of infectious complications [1,3,32,430,517–519]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
It is recommended to continue therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biological DMARD at the previous dose after normalization of the complete blood count and an increase in the blood neutrophil count to ≥ 1.5×109/L in order to prevent an increase in disease activity/maintain disease remission [1,3,32]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe fluconazole at 3–12 mg/kg/day, depending on the severity and duration of induced neutropenia, orally to patients with neutropenia for the prevention of fungal infections resulting from treatment with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs [1,3,32,430,562]. (LoE 4, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) with the hospital rheumatologist who initiated the therapy for all patients with a recurrent episode of decreased neutrophil count, development of febrile neutropenia, and/or decreased blood platelet count according to the complete blood count (CBC), to decide on the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be administered [1,3,32]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to test blood total protein, blood albumin, total bilirubin, free and conjugated bilirubin, blood creatinine, blood urea, blood uric acid, blood glucose, blood ferritin, blood triglycerides, blood cholesterol, blood sodium, blood potassium, blood total calcium, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) activity, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity in serum for all patients at least once every 2–4 weeks to monitor disease activity, liver, kidney, and pancreatic function, as well as electrolyte balance during immunosuppressive and biologic therapy [1,3,32,574,579]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: if blood ferritin levels are ≥ 684 ng/ml, along with elevated blood triglycerides, ALT, AST, and LDH activity combined with bicytopenia, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis should be suspected, and the child must be urgently referred for hospitalization in the inpatient rheumatology department.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue immunosuppressive therapy and/or biologic DMARDs, and continue previously prescribed GCs if blood ALT or AST activity exceeds the upper limit of normal by ≥ 1.5 times and/or other biochemical parameters exceed the upper limit of normal orally to prevent the progression of a toxic reaction [1,3,32]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: a general biochemical blood test should be repeated in a week.
It is recommended to continue immunosuppressive therapy and/or biologic DMARDs at the same dose after normalization of the biochemical parameter(s) to prevent an increase in disease activity / maintain disease remission [1,3,32]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to conduct an in-person appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, if there are data on repeated episodes of an increase in biochemical parameter(s), to resolve the issue of the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out [1,3,32]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to determine the blood level of rheumatoid factor (RF) and antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) at least once every 3 months in patients with seropositive juvenile arthritis to assess the immunological activity of the disease [1,3,4,65,68,70,71]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to determine the blood levels of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-DNA antibodies in all patients receiving TNF-alpha inhibitors at least once every 3 months to assess the immunological activity of the disease and monitor side effects developing during treatment with immunosuppressants and targeted biologic DMARDs [1,3,574,610]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: the serum levels of antinuclear antibodies and anti-DNA antibodies increase in patients receiving TNF-alpha inhibitors (most commonly adalimumab**) when an adverse event occurs, namely a lupus-like reaction.
It is recommended to discontinue TNF-alpha inhibitor therapy while continuing previously prescribed subcutaneous or oral immunosuppressants and/or oral GCs if serum levels of antinuclear antibodies and anti-DNA antibodies increase, in order to prevent the development of drug-induced lupus [1,3,32]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to conduct an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, if serum levels of antinuclear antibodies and anti-DNA antibodies increase, to resolve the issue of the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out [1,3,32].
Comments: if autoantibody titers increase, the decision on the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be carried out is made by the hospital rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, based on the results of an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote) with the hospital rheumatologist who initiated the therapy.
It is recommended to test the serum C-reactive protein level in all patients at least once every 3 months to monitor the activity of the underlying disease and the development of infectious complications [1,3,4,43,44,65,68]. (Level of Evidence 3, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comment: in the inactive stage of the disease/remission and in the absence of infectious complications, the serum C-reactive protein level corresponds to reference values.
Serum C-reactive protein levels increase with the development of infectious complications and exacerbation of the underlying disease.
An appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) is conducted with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy.
The decision on the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out is made by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, based on the results of the consultation (including remote ones).
It is recommended to test blood immunoglobulin levels at least once every 3 months in all patients to detect/exclude an immunodeficiency state developing during treatment with immunosuppressants and targeted biologic DMARDs [1,3,4,65,574]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: a decrease in blood immunoglobulin levels develops in secondary immunodeficiency states, predominantly during #rituximab** therapy under conditions of B-lymphocyte depletion.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic DMARD therapy while continuing previously prescribed oral GCs when blood immunoglobulin levels decrease, in order to prevent infectious complications [1,3,32,574,579]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to conduct an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, in case of decreased blood immunoglobulins, to resolve the issue of the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out [1,3,32]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to hospitalize patients with decreased blood immunoglobulin levels to administer replacement therapy with normal human immunoglobulin** [1,3,32]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to determine antistreptolysin-O in blood serum to detect/exclude infection with group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus at least once every 3 months [1,3,32,44]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: an elevated serum anti-streptolysin-O level indicates acute or chronic streptococcal infection.
It is recommended to maintain vigilance regarding the possible development of infectious diseases in patients with juvenile arthritis receiving targeted biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants with or without GCs [1,3,32,44,582]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic DMARD therapy and continue previously prescribed oral GCs in all patients when signs of an infectious complication appear [1,3,32,44,578]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to conduct an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy for all patients when signs of an infectious complication appear, to resolve the issue of the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out [1,3,32,44,578]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to hospitalize urgently in case of suspected/developed pneumonia [1,3,32,44]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: interstitial pneumonia most commonly develops during the use of #rituximab**, and less commonly with other immunosuppressants and targeted biologic DMARDs.
Pneumonia should be suspected if low-grade/febrile fever, dry/productive cough or minor coughing and/or low-grade/febrile fever unrelated to an exacerbation of the underlying disease, and/or dyspnea/breathing difficulty, and/or crepitations/decreased breath sounds upon auscultation appear.
The child is urgently hospitalized in the inpatient rheumatology department for diagnosis and treatment (see above).
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic DMARD therapy and continue previously prescribed oral GCs in all patients in case of suspected/developed pneumonia [1,3,32,44,578]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to conduct an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy for all patients in case of suspected/developed pneumonia, to resolve the issue of the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out [1,3,32,44]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to prescribe #acyclovir** (J05AB) at a dose of 200 mg orally 5 times a day for children older than 2 years (no more than 1000 mg/day) in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of herpesvirus infections in children, including immunocompromised ones, upon the development of a localized herpes infection [3,32,507,508]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: for children aged < 3 years #acyclovir** (J05AB) is prescribed by decision of the medical commission after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
Treatment with direct-acting and systemic antiviral drugs is carried out until the complete resolution of the viral infection and the completion of antiviral therapy.
Treatment with #acyclovir** is carried out for 7–10 days until the complete resolution of herpetic eruptions.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic DMARD therapy and continue previously prescribed oral GCs upon the development of a herpesvirus infection for the entire duration of antiviral therapy to prevent toxic reactions and the progression of the infectious process [1,3,32,574,579]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to hospitalize all patients with generalized herpes infection / suspected cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus infection to determine further management tactics [1,3,32]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) is conducted with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy to determine further patient management.
It is recommended to resume immunosuppressant and/or targeted biologic DMARD therapy at the same dose in all patients no earlier than 1 week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of herpes infection and the completion of antiviral therapy, in order to prevent increased disease activity / maintain remission [1,3,32,574,579]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a focal tuberculin test (Mantoux test, test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen in standard dilution**) in all patients at least once every 6 months (more frequently if clinically indicated) to exclude Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection during anti-rheumatic therapy [1,3,32,44,88,90–92,212,430,580,581,609]. (Level of Evidence 4, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count and urinalysis (Nechiporenko test) at least once a month in all patients to monitor renal function [1,3,32,44]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
Comments: microhematuria, and rarely macrohematuria, develops as an adverse event of methotrexate** therapy.
It is recommended to discontinue methotrexate** therapy while continuing targeted biologic DMARD therapy and previously prescribed oral GCs if hematuria appears, to prevent the progression of renal damage [1,3,32]. (Level of Evidence 5, Strength of Recommendation C)
It is recommended to have an initial examination, consultation (including remote consultation) by a hospital rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, if hematuria occurs, to address the need for therapy adjustment and determine the appropriate setting for it [1,3,32]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram for all patients at least once every 3 months as part of dispensary follow-up to monitor the cardiovascular system [1,3,32,34]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive ultrasound of the abdominal organs, echocardiography, and renal ultrasound for all patients at least once every 6 months as part of dispensary follow-up to monitor disease activity and adverse events of antirheumatic therapy [1,3,4,32]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
An initial examination and consultation by an otorhinolaryngologist was performed (for patients with ENT pathology, no later than 7 days after discharge from the hospital) to identify foci of chronic ENT infection and address the issue of their sanitation, as well as to diagnose acute ENT infection developed during antirheumatic therapy [1,3,32,95,329]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
A dispensary examination and consultation by an otorhinolaryngologist was performed (at least once every 6 months) to monitor the condition of ENT organs, early detection of pathology, its treatment, and prevention of infectious complications during antirheumatic therapy [1,3,32,95,329]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an initial examination and consultation by a pediatric cardiologist based on medical indications to develop an individualized therapy program based on the recommendations of the inpatient pediatric cardiologist [1,3,32,34,334]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a dispensary examination and consultation by a pediatric cardiologist based on medical indications to monitor the efficacy of the individualized therapy program developed on the recommendations of the inpatient pediatric cardiologist [1,3,32,34,334]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an initial examination and consultation by a pediatric dentist for patients who need sanitation of chronic infection foci and treatment of acute oral infection in order to detect inflammatory changes in the oral cavity [1,3,32,215,330,331]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a dispensary examination and consultation by a pediatric dentist based on medical indications for the early detection of oral pathology, its treatment, and the prevention of infectious complications during antirheumatic therapy [1,3,32,215,330,331]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an initial examination and consultation by an ophthalmologist (with biomicroscopy of the eye no later than 7 days after discharge from the hospital in the presence of ophthalmological pathology) to develop an individualized treatment program based on the recommendations of the inpatient ophthalmologist [1,3,15,332,333,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a follow-up examination and consultation by an ophthalmologist with mandatory eye biomicroscopy for all patients with ophthalmological pathology based on individual indications to monitor treatment efficacy and adjust it if necessary [1,3,15,332,333,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a dispensary examination and consultation by an ophthalmologist (with eye biomicroscopy at least once every 3 months) to monitor the state of the visual organ [1,3,15,332,333,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an initial examination and consultation by a dietitian based on medical indications to develop an individualized dietary program [1,3,32,340,341,527]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a follow-up examination and consultation by a dietitian based on individual indications to monitor/adjust the individualized dietary program [340,341,527]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an initial examination and consultation by a phthisiatrician (in the presence of a positive focal test and/or intradermal test with a tuberculosis allergen with tuberculin, and/or with infiltrative foci in the lungs) to resolve the issue of chemoprophylaxis or anti-tuberculosis therapy [1,3,32,86,88,91,92,213,430,581]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the decision on the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be carried out is made by the rheumatologist of the hospital that initiated the therapy, based on the results of the consultation (including remote consultation).
It is recommended to have an examination, consultation (including remote consultation) by a hospital rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, for patients with a positive intradermal tuberculin test to resolve the issue of whether to continue treatment with genetically engineered biologic drugs and/or immunosuppressants [1,3,32,86,88,91,92,213,430,581]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a follow-up examination and consultation by a phthisiatrician for patients with a positive focal tuberculin test and/or intradermal test with a tuberculosis allergen, and/or an elevated level of interferon-gamma to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens in the blood, and/or focal, infiltrative changes in the lungs to monitor/adjust chemoprophylaxis or anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy [1,3,32,86,88,91,92,213,430,581]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the decision on the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out is made by the rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated the prescription of therapy based on the results of the consultation (including remote ones).
It is recommended to have an initial examination and consultation by a pediatric endocrinologist based on medical indications to prescribe an individualized program recommended by the inpatient pediatric endocrinologist [1,3,32,327,328,335,336,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a dispensary examination and consultation by a pediatric endocrinologist based on medical indications to monitor/adjust the individualized program recommended by the inpatient pediatric endocrinologist [1,3,32,327,328,335,336,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an initial examination and consultation by an orthopedic traumatologist based on medical indications to address the need for orthopedic correction [1,3,32,214,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a follow-up examination and consultation by an orthopedic traumatologist based on medical indications to monitor the efficacy of orthopedic correction [1,3,32,214,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a dispensary examination and consultation by an orthopedic traumatologist based on medical indications to identify functional impairments and monitor orthopedic correction [1,3,32,214,430]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an initial examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist based on medical indications to develop a psychological rehabilitation program for the patient and their parents [1,3,32,221,222,337–339]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a follow-up examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist based on medical indications after completion of the psychological rehabilitation program to assess its efficacy [1,3,32,221,222,337–339]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a dispensary examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist based on medical indications to test the psychological state of patients and their parents [1,3,32,221,222,337–339]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an initial examination and consultation by a physical therapy doctor based on medical indications to develop a program of physiotherapeutic procedures based on the recommendations of the inpatient physical therapy doctor [1,3,32,337,529–531,606]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an initial examination and consultation by a sports medicine and exercise therapy doctor based on medical indications to develop an individualized rehabilitation program based on the recommendations of the inpatient exercise therapy doctor [1,3,32,337,529–531]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to provide medical rehabilitation to all patients with functional impairment as part of an individualized rehabilitation program [1,3,32,337,430,529–541]. (LoE 2, GoR B)
It is recommended to have a follow-up examination and consultation by a physical therapy doctor for all patients who have completed the medical rehabilitation program to monitor its efficacy [1,3,32,337,529–531,606] (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a follow-up examination and consultation by a sports medicine and exercise therapy doctor for all patients who have completed the medical rehabilitation program to monitor its efficacy [1,3,32,337,529–531]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to conduct a follow-up dispensary appointment (examination, consultation) with a physical therapy doctor based on medical indications in order to monitor the effectiveness of/correct the rehabilitation program [1,3,32,337,529–531]. (LEL 5, GR C)
Comments: performed in all patients with juvenile arthritis
It is recommended to plan a hospitalization in the rheumatology department of the inpatient facility that initiated the therapy with genetically engineered biologic drugs (GEBDs) and/or immunosuppressants for all patients 3 and 6 months after therapy initiation, and subsequently every 6 months to monitor the efficacy and safety of the therapy [1,3,4,32]. (LEL 5, GR C)
Comments: scheduled efficacy monitoring is performed at 3 and 6 months after therapy initiation and further every 6 months to monitor the efficacy and safety of antirheumatic therapy.
It is recommended to carry out an unscheduled hospitalization as indicated to the rheumatology department of the inpatient facility that initiated the prescription of GEBDs/immunosuppressants for the purpose of examination and therapy adjustment at any stage of treatment upon the development of exacerbation/complications of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, comorbid conditions, complications/side effects/persistent intolerance to GEBDs/immunosuppressants [1,3,4,32]. (LEL 5, GR C)
It is recommended to monitor the efficacy of GEBDs and/or immunosuppressants in order to timely resolve the issue of "switching" to an immunosuppressant and/or GEBD with a different mechanism of action to achieve disease remission, prevent the development of disease complications and the progression of patient disability [347,423,611]. (LEL 5, GR C)
Comments: monitoring the efficacy of anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs is carried out at least once a month, with special attention paid to the development of secondary inefficacy. Secondary inefficacy of GEBDs and/or immunosuppressants manifests as a "loss" of effect and an increase in disease activity at any stage of treatment. When secondary inefficacy develops, an urgent appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) with a rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated the therapy is carried out.
The decision regarding the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be performed is made by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy based on the consultation results (including remote).
Monitoring of treatment efficacy – see Appendices G1-G4
It is recommended to monitor the tolerability of GEBDs and/or immunosuppressants in all patients to prevent the development of severe toxic complications, timely discontinuation of the drug and "switching" to an immunosuppressant and/or GEBD with a different mechanism of action [1,3,32,347,423,609,611,612]. (LEL 5, GR C)
Comments: intolerance to bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants can develop at any stage of treatment. If intolerance develops, regardless of its severity, the bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant is discontinued. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
It is recommended to conduct an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) with a rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated the therapy for all patients upon the development of any signs of intolerance to the immunosuppressant and/or GEBD to resolve the issue of the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out [1,3,32,574]. (LEL 5, GR C)
It is recommended to conduct an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) with a rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated the therapy when clinical and/or laboratory indicators of disease activity increase and/or any signs of intolerance to the immunosuppressant and/or GEBD develop, to resolve the issue of the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out [1,3,32]. (LEL 5, GR C)
6. Organization of Medical Care
6.1. Indications for hospital admission and discharge of patients.
Suspicion of juvenile arthritis.
Diagnostic procedures, including differential diagnosis and prescribing antirheumatic therapy for all patients, are carried out in a hospital rheumatology department.
Indications for discharge
Completion of examination; establishment of a diagnosis of juvenile arthritis.
Prescription of antirheumatic therapy.
Absence of side effects or intolerance.
Stabilization of the condition during drug therapy: relief of fever and other systemic manifestations, reduction in the activity of joint syndrome.
Pronounced trend toward normalization / normalization of laboratory markers of activity.
Established diagnosis of juvenile arthritis, active stage.
Examination and adjustment of therapy in case of its ineffectiveness are performed for all patients in an inpatient rheumatology department.
Indications for discharge
Completion of examination.
Adjustment of therapy.
Absence of adverse effects or drug intolerance. Stabilization of the condition under pharmacological therapy: resolution of fever, other systemic manifestations, and decrease in joint syndrome activity.
Pronounced trend toward normalization / normalization of laboratory markers of activity.
Established diagnosis of juvenile arthritis, with active hemophagocytic syndrome.
Diagnosis, including differential diagnosis, and prescription of therapy for all patients, intravenous administration of drugs, including biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, are carried out in the setting of the inpatient rheumatology department.
Indications for discharge
Completion of examination.
Prescription of therapy.
Absence of side effects or drug intolerance.
Stabilization of the condition during drug therapy: relief of fever and other systemic manifestations, reduction in the activity of joint syndrome.
Relief of clinical and laboratory signs of hemophagocytic syndrome.
Pronounced tendency toward normalization/normalization of laboratory indicators of juvenile arthritis activity.
Established diagnosis of juvenile arthritis in the remission stage.
Monitoring the efficacy and safety of antirheumatic therapy is carried out in the rheumatology department of the inpatient facility 3 months after therapy initiation; 6 months after therapy initiation; and every 6 months thereafter.
Indications for discharge
50% improvement according to ACR Pedi criteria / inactive disease stage according to C. Wallace criteria at 3 months.
Inactive disease stage at 6 months; remission according to C. Wallace criteria at 12 months and every 6 months thereafter
Absence of adverse events / drug intolerance
Established diagnosis of juvenile arthritis regardless of the stage.
Examination and adjustment of therapy upon the development of complications/intolerance to drug treatment are performed in an inpatient rheumatology department.
Indications for discharge
Completion of examination.
Relief of side effects.
Adjustment of therapy.
Absence of side effects or drug intolerance.
Absence of signs of disease activity.
A patient with an established diagnosis of juvenile arthritis, upon the development of disease exacerbation/complications, comorbid conditions, complications/side effects/persistent intolerance to GEBDs/immunosuppressants, must be urgently hospitalized in the rheumatology department of the inpatient facility that initiated the prescription of GEBDs/immunosuppressants for examination and therapy adjustment at any stage of treatment.
Indications for administering antirheumatic therapy to patients with juvenile arthritis, including genetically engineered biologic drugs (intramuscular and subcutaneous drug administration) in a medical organization (pediatric rheumatology department in a 24-hour inpatient setting and/or day hospital; procedural room of a medical organization providing primary health care; procedural room of a feldsher-midwife station (if a pediatric rheumatology office is absent):
Inability of parents (legal representatives) and/or the patient aged over 15 years to independently administer genetically engineered biologic drugs (intramuscular and subcutaneous administration) at home due to low compliance and lack of drug administration skills.
Indications for consultation with a federal-subordinate medical organization, including via telemedicine technologies:
prescription and/or replacement of genetically engineered biologic drugs and/or selective immunosuppressants in combination with or without glucocorticoid pulse therapy, and/or immunosuppressants, and/or high-dose normal human immunoglobulin in patients with systemic-onset juvenile arthritis with high/moderate inflammatory activity and/or resistance to ongoing drug treatment.
6.2. Regulatory legal documents in accordance with which medical care is provided to children with juvenile arthritis:
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 700n dated October 7, 2015 (as amended on December 9, 2019) "On the Nomenclature of Specialties of Specialists with Higher Medical and Pharmaceutical Education" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on November 12, 2015, Registration No. 39696).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 206n dated May 2, 2023 "On Approval of Qualification Requirements for Medical and Pharmaceutical Workers with Higher Education" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on June 1, 2023, Registration No. 73677).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 441n dated October 25, 2012 "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Children in the Profile 'Rheumatology'" (as amended on February 21, 2020).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 274n dated April 21, 2022 “On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Patients with Congenital and (or) Hereditary Diseases” (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on July 13, 2022, registration No. 69251).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 878n dated October 23, 2019 "On Approval of the Procedure for Organizing Medical Rehabilitation of Children" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on December 23, 2019, Registration No. 56954).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 231n dated March 19, 2021 (as amended on February 21, 2022) "On Approval of the Procedure for Monitoring the Volume, Timing, Quality, and Conditions of Provision of Medical Care under Compulsory Medical Insurance to Insured Persons, as well as its Financial Provision" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on May 13, 2021, No. 63410).
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 108n dated February 28, 2019 (as amended on December 13, 2022) "On Approval of the Rules of Compulsory Medical Insurance" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on May 17, 2019, No. 54643).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 789n dated December 13, 2022 "On Amending the Rules for Compulsory Medical Insurance Approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 108n dated February 28, 2019". (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on December 30, 2022, No. 71905).
Amendment 14.1 to Article 37. Organization of Medical Care of Federal Law No. 323-FZ dated November 21, 2011 (as amended on June 11, 2022, with amendments dated July 13, 2022) "On the Basics of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation" (with amendments and additions, entered into force on June 29, 2022) "It is permitted to include in the standards of medical care for children and clinical guidelines a medicinal product registered in the territory of the Russian Federation used in accordance with the indications (characteristics) of the medicinal product not specified in its instructions for use, if such medicinal product complies with the requirements established by the Government of the Russian Federation. The list of diseases or conditions (groups of diseases or conditions) for which the use of a medicinal product in accordance with the indications (characteristics) of the medicinal product not specified in its instructions for use is permitted is established by the Government of the Russian Federation.
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1180-r dated May 16, 2022 "List of Diseases or Conditions (Groups of Diseases or Conditions) in Which the Use of a Medicinal Product in Accordance with Indications (Characteristics) of the Medicinal Product Not Specified in Its Instructions for Use Is Permitted".
Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1799 dated October 27, 2023 "On Approval of Requirements for a Medicinal Product Registered in the Territory of the Russian Federation Used in Accordance with Indications (Characteristics) of the Medicinal Product Not Specified in Its Instructions for Use, the Inclusion of Which Is Permitted in Standards of Medical Care for Children and Clinical Guidelines".
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1008n dated September 23, 2020 "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Patients with Medical Nutrition" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on September 30, 2020, registration No. 60137).
7. Additional Information
It is recommended to refer children to the ITU bureau (medico-social expertise bureau) to obtain the status of "disabled child". The diagnosis upon referral for MSE is established in accordance with the recommendations (see section 1.5).
Assignment of the status of "disabled child" to children with JIA is carried out in accordance with the following regulatory and legal documents:
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 588 dated April 5, 2022 (as amended on March 12, 2024) "On Declaring a Person Disabled" (as amended by Decrees of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2121 dated November 23, 2022, No. 77 dated January 24, 2023, No. 1887 dated November 10, 2023, No. 2003 dated November 28, 2023, No. 289 dated April 12, 2024).
Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 585n dated August 27, 2019 (as amended on November 6, 2021) "On Classifications and Criteria Used in Carrying out Medical and Social Expertise of Citizens by Federal State Institutions of Medical and Social Expertise"
Subparagraph 5.2.105 of the Regulations on the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 610 dated June 19, 2012 (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2012, No. 26, Art. 3528; 2013, No. 22, Art. 2809; No. 36, Art. 4578; No. 37, Art. 4703; No. 45, Art. 5822; No. 46, Art. 5952; 2014, No. 21, Art. 2710; No. 26, Art. 3577; No. 29, Art. 4160; No. 32, Art. 4499; No. 36, Art. 4868; 2015, No. 2, Art. 491; No. 6, Art. 963; No. 16, Art. 2384; 2016, No. 2, Art. 325; No. 4, Art. 534; No. 23, Art. 3322; No. 28, Art. 4741; No. 29, Art. 4812; No. 43, Art. 6038; No. 47, Art. 6659; 2017, No. 1, Art. 187; No. 7, Art. 1093; No. 17, Art. 2581; No. 22, Art. 3149; No. 28, Art. 4167; 2018, No. 10, Art. 1494; No. 24, Art. 3530; No. 36, Art. 5634; No. 46, Art. 7052; No. 49, Art. 7600; No. 53, Art. 8678; 2019, No. 1, Art. 31; No. 5, Art. 408; No. 21, Art. 2563)
Appendix No. 2 to the classifications and criteria used in carrying out medical and social expertise by federal state institutions of medical and social expertise, approved by Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 585n dated August 27, 2019
Quantitative scoring system for the severity of persistent impairments of body functions in children under 18 years of age caused by diseases, consequences of injuries, or defects (in percentages, applied to the clinical and functional characteristics of persistent impairments of human body functions)
If the "disabled child" status is granted, the child and their parents will be entitled to a number of social services; preferential travel; benefits for medical devices, instruments, and medications; benefits for admission to secondary and higher educational institutions; free travel for the child and an accompanying adult to the place of treatment (sanatorium, resort) and back; an annual sanatorium-treatment voucher for the child and the accompanying adult.
In the event of untimely provision of a pathogenesis-based GEBD to a child with juvenile arthritis, there is a high probability of disease exacerbation/increased disease activity, multiple organ failure, progression of joint damage and functional impairment in the patient.
7.1. Outcomes and prognosis
Oligoarticular juvenile arthritis. Approximately 40% of patients achieve remission. More than 50% of patients maintain disease activity, 40% of whom have oligoarthritis transform into polyarthritis, but the number of affected joints is smaller than in polyarthritis at disease onset. With a long-term disease course, osteoarthritis may develop after clinical remission. Mortality is very low. Blindness develops in 10% of patients with uveitis [1,529,613].
Poor prognostic factors (ACR, 2011) in oligoarticular JIA: Involvement of the hip joints or cervical spine, involvement of the ankle or wrist joint, significant or prolonged elevation of laboratory markers, joint destruction according to radiological imaging (erosions of the articular surfaces or narrowing of the joint spaces) [347,348,423,550].
Polyarticular RF-negative juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The course of arthritis in most patients is relatively benign. Severe destructive changes develop in 10% of patients, mainly in the hip and temporomandibular joints. All children with early-onset RF-negative polyarticular JIA have a poor prognosis, a high risk of developing severe destructive arthritis, and musculoskeletal disability [347,348,423,550].
Poor prognostic factor (ACR, 2011): hip joint involvement.
All children with RF-positive polyarticular JIA have a poor prognosis, a high risk of developing severe destructive arthritis, and musculoskeletal disability. With timely initiated adequate therapy, the remission rate is up to 65%. Fatal outcomes are primarily associated with the development of amyloidosis.
Poor prognostic factors in RF-positive polyarticular JIA (ACR, 2011):
Hip joint involvement, positive RF or presence of ACPA [347,348,423,550].
Poor prognostic factors for the course of JIA-associated uveitis [31].
Early onset of uveitis
Short interval between arthritis onset and uveitis (< 6 months2)
Development of uveitis before arthritis onset
High inflammatory activity (> 2+ anterior chamber cell count at disease onset)
Complicated initial course at uveitis onset
Continuous course of uveitis, short remission
Presence of complications:
Development of synechiae
High inflammatory activity (> 2+ cells in the anterior chamber)
Dense vitreous infiltration
Cataract
Glaucoma
Macular edema
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
Organizational and technical conditions for the provision of medical care.
Type of medical care | Specialized medical care |
|---|---|
Conditions of medical care | Inpatient / in a day hospital |
Form of medical care | Elective |
Table 1. Quality assessment criteria for initial diagnosis in establishing a diagnosis of juvenile arthritis.
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Diagnosis, including differential diagnosis, performed in all patients with suspected JIA in a rheumatology inpatient setting | C |
2 | A detailed general (clinical) blood test was performed (study of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, study of red blood cell level in blood, study of white blood cell level in blood, study of platelet level in blood, differential leukocyte count (leukocyte formula), study of total hemoglobin level in blood) | C |
3 | Determination of prothrombin index, testing for soluble fibrin monomer complexes in the blood, determination of prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, determination of activated partial thromboplastin time, determination of thrombin time in the blood, testing for protein C level in the blood, determination of protein S activity in the blood, testing for plasminogen level in the blood, testing for fibrinogen level in the blood, determination of D-dimer concentration in the blood, testing for von Willebrand factor activity and properties in the blood, determination of antithrombin III activity in the blood in patients with signs of vasculitis | C |
4 | Thromboelastography has been performed in patients with signs of vasculitis | C |
5 | ABO blood group typing, determination of subgroups and minor blood groups A-1, A-2, D, Cc, E, Kell, Duffy, and Rhesus D antigen (Rh factor) determination were performed prior to invasive procedures (esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy with biopsy, bone marrow puncture aspiration, cytological examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints, bone biopsy) | C |
6 | Testing for total protein level in the blood, testing for albumin level in the blood, testing for total bilirubin level in the blood, testing for free and conjugated bilirubin level in the blood, testing for creatinine level in the blood, testing for urea level in the blood, testing for uric acid level in the blood, testing for glucose level in the blood, testing for ferritin level in the blood, testing for triglycerides level in the blood, testing for cholesterol level in the blood, testing for sodium level in the blood, testing for potassium level in the blood, testing for total calcium level in the blood, determination of lactate dehydrogenase activity in the blood, determination of aspartate aminotransferase activity in the blood, determination of alanine aminotransferase activity in the blood, determination of gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in the blood, determination of alkaline phosphatase activity in the blood, testing for serum iron level in the blood, testing for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, testing for cholesterol level, determination of creatine kinase activity in the blood, determination of pancreatic amylase activity in the blood, determination of lipase activity in the blood | C |
7 | A study of the C-reactive protein level in blood serum was performed | C |
8 | Determination of autoantibodies to cell nuclei and DNA in blood; determination of rheumatoid factor (RF) in blood; determination of markers for ANCA-associated vasculitis: PR3 (c-ANCA), MPO (p-ANCA); determination of anticentromere antibodies in blood; determination of anti-RNA antibodies in blood; determination of antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) in blood; determination of antinuclear antibodies to Sm antigen in blood; determination of antibodies to RNA polymerase (Ro antigen) and RNA-associated protein (La antigen) in blood; determination of antiphospholipid antibodies in blood; determination of anticardiolipin antibodies in blood; determination of anti-beta-2-glycoprotein antibodies in blood; determination of anti-Scl-70 antibodies in blood; C3 and C4 complement fraction levels test | C |
9 | A study of immunoglobulin levels in blood was performed | C |
10 | Antistreptolysin-O blood serum test | C |
11 | Determination of HLA antigens (HLA-B27 antigen) | C |
12 | A set of diagnostic tests performed for cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes and other autoinflammatory syndromes in patients with fever, rash, uveitis, as well as in children with early onset and atypical disease course | C |
13 | Lymphocyte subset testing performed in patients frequently suffering from viral, purulent bacterial infections, including opportunistic infections | C |
14 | Focal tuberculin skin test (Mantoux test, test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen in standard dilution**) and blood interferon-gamma release assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens | C |
15 | Determination of antibodies of classes A, M, G (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci in the blood; determination of antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae in the blood, determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to Chlamydia trachomatis in the blood, determination of antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the blood | C |
16 | Performed determination of antibodies to Salmonella enterica in blood, determination of antibodies to Salmonella typhi in blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in blood, determination of antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica serovars in blood | C |
17 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella boydii in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella dysenteriae in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella sonnei in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella flexneri in the blood was performed | C |
18 | Determination of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of tick-borne borreliosis agents of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group in the blood by PCR; determination of class M antibodies (IgM) to tick-borne borreliosis agents of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group in the blood; determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to tick-borne borreliosis agents of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group in the blood, determination of total antibodies to tick-borne borreliosis agents of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group in the blood in patients with a history of visiting a forest, living in tick-endemic areas, or a tick bite, for the purpose of ruling out borreliosis was performed | C |
19 | Determination of Epstein-Barr virus DNA by PCR in peripheral and cord blood (quantitative assay), determination of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in oropharyngeal swabs by PCR (qualitative assay), determination of Epstein-Barr virus DNA by PCR (qualitative assay) in urine in patients with fever | C |
20 | Determination of Cytomegalovirus DNA by PCR in peripheral and cord blood (quantitative assay), determination of Cytomegalovirus DNA in oropharyngeal swabs by PCR (qualitative assay), determination of Cytomegalovirus DNA in urine by PCR (qualitative assay) in patients with fever | C |
21 | Determination of Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2 DNA by PCR in the blood (quantitative assay), determination of Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2 DNA by PCR in oropharyngeal swabs (qualitative assay), determination of Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2 DNA by PCR (qualitative assay) in urine in patients with clinical signs of active herpetic infection and/or fever | C |
22 | Determination of antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Cytomegalovirus in the blood in patients with fever | C |
23 | Determination of antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus in the blood in patients with fever | C |
24 | Determination of antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen (VCA) in the blood in patients with fever | C |
25 | Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus early antigens (EA) in the blood in patients with fever | C |
26 | Determination of antibodies to Herpes simplex virus in the blood in patients with clinical signs of herpetic infection and/or fever | C |
27 | Molecular biological study of blood for Toxoplasma gondii in patients with a history of animal contact was performed | C |
28 | Blood tests for Leishmania antibodies were performed in patients with a history of travel to endemic areas | C |
29 | Molecular biological testing of blood for Hepatitis C virus and molecular biological testing of blood for Hepatitis B virus in patients with clinical and laboratory signs of hepatitis | C |
30 | Determination of antibodies to Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) and determination of antibodies to Hepatitis C virus in the blood in patients with clinical and laboratory signs of hepatitis | C |
31 | Blood tests for antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 and HIV-2 were performed in patients with signs of immunodeficiency | C |
32 | Procalcitonin level blood testing was performed in patients with fever | C |
33 | Microbiological (cultural) blood test for sterility and microbiological (cultural) urine test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic pathogens were performed in patients with fever | C |
34 | Microbiological (culture) examination of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal wall mucus for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms performed | C |
35 | General (clinical) urinalysis, urinalysis by Nechiporenko method | C |
36 | Fecal calprotectin level testing was performed | C |
37 | Comprehensive ultrasound examination (ultrasound) of internal organs (includes comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, kidney ultrasound) was performed | C |
38 | Echocardiography performed | C |
39 | Electrocardiogram recording performed | C |
40 | Joint ultrasound examination performed | C |
41 | Radiography of the temporomandibular joint and/or intervertebral joints, and/or elbow joint, and/or wrist joint, and/or knee joint, and/or shoulder joint, and/or hip joint, and/or ankle joint, and/or acromioclavicular joint, and/or sternoclavicular joint, and/or hand, and/or foot in two projections, or joint computed tomography with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) performed in all patients with joint involvement | C |
42 | Computed tomography of a joint with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients with mono- or oligoarthritis and MRI findings atypical for JIA | C |
43 | Magnetic resonance imaging of joints (single joint) with contrast enhancement using anesthesia management (including early postoperative management) or without it was performed in patients with arthritis | A |
44 | Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine (one segment), computed tomography of the spine (one segment), computed tomography of the pelvic bones with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients with complaints of back pain, presence of enthesopathies (according to physical examination), patients with positive HLA-B27, when juvenile ankylosing spondylitis is suspected | C |
45 | Ultrasound examination of the salivary glands in patients with positive RF and/or ACPA, patients with suspected Sjögren's syndrome | C |
46 | Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissues of the head with intravenous contrast with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients with positive RF and/or ACPA, patients with suspected Sjögren's syndrome | C |
47 | Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) performed | C |
48 | Microbiological (culture) examination of gastric mucosa biopsy specimens for Helicobacter pylori was performed in patients with inflammatory and/or erosive and/or ulcerative changes according to esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings | C |
49 | Esophagoscopy with biopsy, gastroscopy with biopsy, duodenoscopy with biopsy, and jejunoscopy with biopsy in the presence of inflammatory and/or erosive and/or ulcerative mucosal changes, with or without anesthesia management (including early postoperative management), accompanied by pathomorphological examination of the esophageal, gastric, duodenal, and jejunal biopsy (surgical) material, were performed in patients with inflammatory and/or erosive and/or ulcerative mucosal changes | C |
50 | Colonoscopy with anesthesia (including early postoperative management) | C |
51 | Colon biopsy using endoscopy with pathomorphological examination of the colonic biopsy (surgical) material in patients with inflammatory and/or erosive, and/or ulcerative changes of the colon according to colonoscopy | C |
52 | Video capsule small bowel endoscopy was performed in patients with clinical signs of inflammatory bowel disease and/or elevated fecal calprotectin levels in the absence of abnormalities on esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy | C |
53 | Performed computed tomography of the chest organs with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) | C |
54 | Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, intravenous contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal cavity, intravenous contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the retroperitoneal space, and intravenous contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic organs performed with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in patients with severe general condition, fever, and inconsistency of the general condition with the joint involvement | C |
55 | Computed tomography of the abdominal organs with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement, and computed tomography of the retroperitoneal space with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement, with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management), were performed when MRI was contraindicated | C |
56 | Bone marrow aspiration for cytological preparation and bone marrow trephine biopsy for histological preparation performed with anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), including cytological examination of bone marrow smear (myelogram) and pathological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods in patients with severe general condition, fever, and inconsistency of the general condition with the joint involvement | C |
57 | Lymph node biopsy (peripheral, or intra-abdominal/intrathoracic as indicated) performed under anesthesia (including early postoperative management), including cytological examination of lymph node tissue preparation and pathomorphological examination of lymph node biopsy (surgical) material in patients with marked enlargement of peripheral and/or intrathoracic, and/or intra-abdominal lymph nodes | C |
58 | Performed positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)) with contrast enhancement if necessary; whole-body positron emission tomography using tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)) with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) in patients with severe arthralgia, myalgia, ossalgia, bone destruction, subcutaneous adipose tissue infiltrates, and focal lesions in parenchymal organs, the brain, or the spinal cord | C |
59 | Multi-site bone scintigraphy performed with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in patients with bone destruction foci that are atypical for juvenile arthritis | C |
60 | CT-guided pelvic bone trephine biopsy performed with anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), including pathological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods; cytological examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; immunocytochemical examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; and immunophenotyping of hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow in patients with severe general condition, fever, and inconsistency of the general condition with the joint involvement | C |
61 | Bone biopsy performed with anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), including pathological examination of bone tissue biopsy (surgical) material in patients with bone destruction foci atypical for juvenile arthritis | C |
62 | Initial consultation (examination) by a pediatric oncologist performed in patients with suspected oncological or onco-hematological diseases based on examination results | C |
63 | Initial consultation (examination) by a phthisiatrician performed in patients with a positive focal tuberculin skin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculosis allergen, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or infiltrative pulmonary foci | C |
64 | Initial consultation (examination) by an orthopedic traumatologist performed in patients with expansive and destructive bone changes, as well as bone deformities atypical for juvenile arthritis | C |
65 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by anotorhinolaryngologist was completed. | C |
66 | Initial ophthalmologist consultation (examination) with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy was performed | C |
67 | Initial consultation (examination) by a pediatric dentist | C |
68 | Initial consultation (examination) by a neurologist performed in patients with neurological symptoms, severe pain syndrome, psychomotor developmental delay, and psychotic reactions | C |
69 | Initial consultation (examination) by an otolaryngologist-audiologist and audiogram performed in patients with suspected autoinflammatory syndromes | C |
70 | Initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist was performed for patients scheduled for procedures under general anesthesia | C |
71 | Initial consultation (examination) by an anesthesiologist-reanimatologist performed in all patients in critical condition | C |
72 | Performed 24-hour monitoring by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for all critically ill patients (multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, hemophagocytic syndrome) | C |
73 | Performed initial examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist in all patients aged 1 year and older and their parents (regardless of the child's age) | A |
Table 2. Diagnostic quality criteria for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Diagnosis, including differential diagnosis, performed in all patients with suspected secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in a rheumatology inpatient setting | C |
2 | A detailed general (clinical) blood test was performed (study of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, study of red blood cell level in blood, study of white blood cell level in blood, study of platelet level in blood, differential leukocyte count (leukocyte formula), study of total hemoglobin level in blood) | C |
3 | Determination of prothrombin index, study of soluble fibrin monomer complexes in the blood, determination of prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, determination of activated partial thromboplastin time, determination of thrombin time in the blood, study of protein C level in the blood, determination of protein S activity in the blood, study of plasminogen level in the blood, study of fibrinogen level in the blood, determination of D-dimer concentration in the blood, study of von Willebrand factor activity and properties in the blood, determination of antithrombin III activity in the blood were performed | C |
4 | Performed thromboelastography | C |
5 | Blood heparin level testing | C |
6 | Blood total protein test, blood albumin test, blood total bilirubin test, blood free and conjugated bilirubin test, blood creatinine test, blood urea test, blood uric acid test, blood glucose test, blood ferritin test, blood triglycerides test, blood cholesterol test, blood sodium test, blood potassium test, blood total calcium test, blood lactate dehydrogenase activity assay, blood aspartate aminotransferase activity assay, blood alanine aminotransferase activity assay, blood gamma-glutamyl transferase activity assay, blood alkaline phosphatase activity assay, blood serum iron test, blood creatine kinase activity assay, blood pancreatic amylase activity assay, blood lipase activity assay | C |
7 | A study of the C-reactive protein level in blood serum was performed | C |
8 | Microbiological (cultural) blood test for sterility, microbiological (cultural) test of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal swabs for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, microbiological (cultural) urine test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic pathogens, and microbiological (cultural) stool test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms with antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed | C |
9 | Determination of class A, M, G antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci in blood; determination of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in blood; determination of antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae in blood; determination of class M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in blood | C |
10 | Determination of Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
11 | Quantitative PCR determination of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in peripheral and cord blood; qualitative PCR determination of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in oropharyngeal mucosal swabs; and qualitative PCR determination of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in urine | C |
12 | Performed Cytomegalovirus DNA determination by PCR in peripheral and cord blood, quantitative assay; Cytomegalovirus DNA determination in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs by PCR, qualitative assay; Cytomegalovirus DNA determination in urine by PCR, qualitative assay | C |
13 | Determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in the blood, quantitative study, determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs, qualitative study, determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in urine, qualitative study was performed | C |
14 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus) in the blood was performed | C |
15 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
16 | Determination of antibodies to capsid antigen (VCA) of Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
17 | Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to early antigens (EA) of Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
18 | Determination of antibodies to herpes simplex virus (Herpes simplex virus) in the blood was performed | C |
19 | Microbiological (cultural) test of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms using automated seeding with antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed upon detection of interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to chest computed tomography | C |
20 | Determination of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
21 | Determination of Cytomegalovirus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
22 | Quantitative determination of Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in sputum, endotracheal aspirate, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
23 | Determination of class M and G antibodies to Pneumocystis jirovecii in blood when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
24 | Microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis carinii cysts when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
25 | Microbiological (cultural) test of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeast and mycelial) was performed upon detection of interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to chest computed tomography | C |
26 | Determination of Candida albicans mannan antigen and Aspergillus spp. galactomannan antigen in blood serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
27 | Determination of Candida albicans mannan antigen and Aspergillus spp. galactomannan antigen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
28 | Blood procalcitonin level testing | C |
29 | General (clinical) urinalysis, urinary albumin determination, and 24-hour urinary protein quantification have been performed | C |
30 | A comprehensive ultrasound examination of internal organs (including comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and renal ultrasound) was performed | C |
31 | Echocardiography performed | C |
32 | Electrocardiogram recording performed | C |
33 | Performed computed tomography of the chest organs with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) | C |
34 | Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) was performed in patients with neurological symptoms | C |
35 | Magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal cavity, retroperitoneal space, and pelvic organs with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) was performed in patients who developed multiorgan failure | C |
36 | Obtaining a bone marrow cytologic preparation by puncture with anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) and a bone marrow histologic preparation with bone marrow smear cytologic examination (myelogram) and pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material was performed | C |
37 | Initial consultation (examination) by a neurologist was performed in patients with neurological symptoms | C |
38 | Initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist was performed for patients scheduled for procedures under general anesthesia | C |
39 | Initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist was performed for patients in severe/critical condition | C |
40 | Daily monitoring by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist was performed for patients with pancytopenia, single-organ and multiorgan failure, and CNS damage | C |
41 | Initial visit (examination, consultation) by an ophthalmologist was performed for patients with hemorrhagic syndrome | C |
Table 3. Quality assessment criteria for the evaluation of patients with established juvenile arthritis prior to the initiation or adjustment of antirheumatic therapy
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Evaluation performed prior to the initiation or adjustment of therapy in all patients with established juvenile arthritis in the active stage within a rheumatology inpatient setting | C |
2 | A detailed general (clinical) blood test was performed (study of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, study of red blood cell level in blood, study of white blood cell level in blood, study of platelet level in blood, differential leukocyte count (leukocyte formula), study of total hemoglobin level in blood) | C |
3 | Determination of prothrombin index, testing for soluble fibrin monomer complexes in the blood, determination of prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, determination of activated partial thromboplastin time, determination of thrombin time in the blood, testing for protein C level in the blood, determination of protein S activity in the blood, testing for plasminogen level in the blood, testing for fibrinogen level in the blood, determination of D-dimer concentration in the blood, testing for von Willebrand factor activity and properties in the blood, determination of antithrombin III activity in the blood in patients with signs of vasculitis | C |
4 | Blood heparin level testing performed in patients with signs of vasculitis | C |
5 | Thromboelastography has been performed in patients with signs of vasculitis | C |
6 | Blood total protein test, blood albumin test, blood total bilirubin test, blood free and conjugated bilirubin test, blood creatinine test, blood urea test, blood uric acid test, blood glucose test, blood ferritin test, blood triglycerides test, blood cholesterol test, blood sodium test, blood potassium test, blood total calcium test, blood lactate dehydrogenase activity assay, blood aspartate aminotransferase activity assay, blood alanine aminotransferase activity assay, blood gamma-glutamyl transferase activity assay, blood alkaline phosphatase activity assay, blood serum iron test, blood creatine kinase activity assay, blood pancreatic amylase activity assay, blood lipase activity assay | C |
7 | Determination of main AB0 blood groups, subgroups and other minor blood groups A-1, A-2, D, Cc, E, Kell, Duffy, and Rhesus D antigen (Rh factor) determination in all patients prior to invasive procedures (esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy with biopsy, kidney biopsy) or blood transfusions | C |
8 | Blood procalcitonin level measurement was performed in all patients with fever | C |
9 | A study of the C-reactive protein level in blood serum was performed | C |
10 | Antistreptolysin-O blood serum test | C |
11 | Determination of blood rheumatoid factor (RF), blood anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), and antibodies to cell nuclear antigens and DNA | C |
12 | Lymphocyte subset analysis performed in all patients receiving #rituximab**, as well as in patients with frequent viral and purulent bacterial infections, including opportunistic infections | C |
13 | Focal tuberculin skin test (Mantoux test, test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen in standard dilution**) and blood interferon-gamma release assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens | C |
14 | Performed determination of antibodies to Salmonella enterica in blood, determination of antibodies to Salmonella typhi in blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in blood, determination of antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica serovars in blood | C |
15 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella boydii in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella dysenteriae in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella sonnei in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella flexneri in the blood was performed | C |
16 | Determination of class A, M, G antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci in blood; determination of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in blood; determination of antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae in blood; determination of class M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in blood | C |
17 | Quantitative PCR determination of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in peripheral and cord blood, qualitative PCR determination of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in oropharyngeal mucosal swabs, and qualitative PCR determination of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in urine performed in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or fever, and/or those receiving #rituximab** | C |
18 | Quantitative PCR determination of Cytomegalovirus DNA in peripheral and cord blood, qualitative PCR determination of Cytomegalovirus DNA in oropharyngeal mucosal swabs, and qualitative PCR determination of Cytomegalovirus DNA in urine performed in patients with clinical manifestations of cytomegalovirus infection and/or fever, and/or those receiving #rituximab** | C |
19 | Quantitative PCR determination of Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in blood, qualitative PCR determination of Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in oropharyngeal mucosal swabs, and qualitative PCR determination of Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in urine performed in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection and/or fever, and/or those receiving #rituximab** | C |
20 | Determination of blood IgM and IgG classes of antibodies to Cytomegalovirus performed in patients with clinical manifestations of cytomegalovirus infection and/or fever, and/or those receiving #rituximab** | C |
21 | Determination of blood IgM and IgG classes of antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus performed in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or fever, and/or those receiving #rituximab** | C |
22 | Determination of blood antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen (VCA) performed in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or fever, and/or those receiving #rituximab** | C |
23 | Determination of blood IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus early antigens (EA) performed in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or fever, and/or those receiving #rituximab** | C |
24 | Determination of blood antibodies to Herpes simplex virus performed in patients with clinical signs of herpetic infection and/or fever, and/or those receiving #rituximab** | C |
25 | Microbiological (cultural) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis carinii cysts performed in all patients when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative pulmonary changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
26 | Quantitative PCR determination of Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in sputum, endotracheal aspirate, or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid performed in all patients when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative pulmonary changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
27 | PCR determination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG) DNA with species differentiation in sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, or bronchial washings performed in all patients when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative pulmonary changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
28 | Determination of blood IgM and IgG antibodies to Pneumocystis jirovecii performed in all patients when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative pulmonary changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
29 | PCR determination of Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid performed in all patients when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative pulmonary changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
30 | Cytomegalovirus DNA detection in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR was performed in all patients presenting with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
31 | Microbiological (culture) sputum examination for fungi (yeasts and molds) was performed in all patients presenting with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
32 | Performed microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeast and mold) in all patients when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected by chest computed tomography | C |
33 | Microbiological (culture) examination of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms was performed in all patients presenting with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
34 | Determination of antibodies to Aspergillus spp. in blood was performed in all patients presenting with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
35 | Determination of mannan and galactomannan in lavage fluid and blood was performed in all patients presenting with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
36 | Determination of Candida albicans mannan antigen and Aspergillus spp. galactomannan antigen in blood serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
37 | Determination of Candida albicans mannan antigen and Aspergillus spp. galactomannan antigen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
38 | Microbiological (culture) examination of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal swabs for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms was performed | C |
39 | Microbiological (cultural) blood test for sterility, and microbiological (cultural) urine test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic microorganisms were performed in patients with febrile and hectic fever | C |
40 | General (clinical) urinalysis and Nechyporenko urine test were performed | C |
41 | Fecal calprotectin level testing was performed in patients with clinical manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease | C |
42 | Comprehensive ultrasound examination (ultrasound) of internal organs (includes comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, kidney ultrasound) was performed | C |
43 | Echocardiography performed | C |
44 | Electrocardiogram recording performed | C |
45 | Holter heart rhythm monitoring was performed in patients with arrhythmia and electrocardiographic abnormalities | C |
46 | Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed in patients with arterial hypertension | C |
47 | Joint ultrasound was performed in all patients with active arthritis | C |
48 | X-ray of the temporomandibular joint and/or intervertebral joints, and/or elbow joint, and/or wrist joint, and/or knee joint, and/or shoulder joint, and/or hip joint, and/or ankle joint, and/or acromioclavicular joint, and/or sternoclavicular joint, and/or hand, and/or foot in two projections, or computed tomography of the joint with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), performed in patients with active arthritis | C |
49 | Magnetic resonance imaging of joints (single joint) with contrast enhancement, with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), performed in all patients with active arthritis | A |
50 | Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine (one segment), computed tomography of the spine (one segment), or computed tomography of the pelvic bones with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) was performed in patients presenting with back pain and enthesopathy (on physical examination) when juvenile ankylosing spondylitis is suspected | C |
51 | Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast enhancement using anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) or without it performed in patients with neurological symptoms | C |
52 | Magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal cavity with intravenous contrast, magnetic resonance imaging of the retroperitoneal space with intravenous contrast, or magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis with intravenous contrast with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) was performed in patients with severe general condition, fever, and discrepancy between the general condition and the severity of joint involvement | C |
53 | Computed tomography of the abdominal cavity with intravenous bolus contrast or computed tomography of the retroperitoneal space with intravenous bolus contrast with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) was performed in patients with contraindications to MRI who present with a severe general condition, fever, and discrepancy between the general condition and the severity of joint involvement | C |
54 | Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) performed | C |
55 | Gastric/duodenal biopsy via endoscopy with pathomorphological examination of the gastric biopsy (surgical) material and microbiological (culture) examination of gastric mucosa biopsy specimens for Helicobacter pylori in the presence of inflammatory and/or erosive, and/or ulcerative changes of the mucous membrane | C |
56 | Bronchoscopy with anesthetic management (including early postoperative management) was performed in patients with lung involvement | C |
57 | Performed computed tomography of the chest organs with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) | C |
58 | X-ray densitometry performed in patients currently or previously receiving GCs | C |
59 | Respiratory flowmetry performed in all patients with pulmonary involvement | C |
60 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by anotorhinolaryngologist was completed. | C |
61 | Initial consultation (examination) by a pediatric dentist | C |
62 | Initial ophthalmologist consultation (examination) with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy was performed | C |
63 | An initial consultation (examination) by a pediatric cardiologist was performed in patients with cardiac dysfunction and/or arterial hypertension | C |
64 | Initial examination (consultation, assessment) by a phthisiologist performed for patients with a positive focal tuberculin test and/or intradermal tuberculin allergen test, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels specific to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or focal or infiltrative lung changes | C |
65 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) with a pediatric endocrinologist was performed in patients with comorbid endocrinological pathology, including steroid diabetes | C |
66 | Initial examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist performed for patients aged 1 year and older and their parents | A |
67 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) with a neurologist was performed in patients with neurological symptoms, psychomotor developmental delay, or psychotic reactions | C |
68 | Initial dietitian consultation (examination) was performed in patients with underweight, amyotrophy, osteopenia/osteoporosis, constitutional obesity and Cushing's syndrome, or steroid diabetes | C |
69 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) with an orthopedic traumatologist was performed in patients with functional joint impairment, bone growth disorders, subluxations, or back pain | C |
70 | Initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist was performed in all patients scheduled for procedures under general anesthesia | C |
71 | Initial consultation (examination) by an anesthesiologist-reanimatologist performed in all patients in critical condition | C |
72 | Daily monitoring by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist was performed for all patients in severe/critical condition (multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, macrophage activation syndrome) | C |
Table 4. Quality assessment criteria for the treatment of juvenile polyarthritis (seronegative polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, seropositive polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis)
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Pathogenetic therapy was prescribed in the inpatient rheumatology department for all patients following diagnostic workup, including differential diagnosis, and establishment/confirmation of the JA diagnosis | C |
2 | Therapy adjustment (drug switching) was performed until efficacy or minimal/low disease activity was achieved in patients with long-standing disease, regardless of the drug used | C |
3 | Switching to another selective immunosuppressant (JAK inhibitor) and/or generic was performed exclusively for medical indications; automatic switching was not performed | C |
4 | Switching to another genetically engineered biologic drug and/or biosimilar was performed exclusively based on medical indications; automatic switching was not performed | C |
5 | Treatment efficacy control for any pathogenetic therapy drug was performed at 3 and 6 months, and then every 6 months of therapy (the drug is effective upon achieving 50% improvement by ACRpedi criteria at 3 months, inactive disease state at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria) | C |
6 | NSAID monotherapy for a duration of not more than 1 month was prescribed to patients with an unconfirmed JA diagnosis during the diagnostic workup stage | C |
7 | NSAIDs were prescribed to patients with a confirmed JA diagnosis | C |
8 | NSAID monotherapy with a duration of not more than 1 month was performed | C |
9 | Oral and/or intravenous and/or intra-articular glucocorticoids, and/or immunosuppressants (methotrexate**, #leflunomide**), and/or biologic DMARDs (tocilizumab**, adalimumab**, etanercept**, abatacept**, or #rituximab**) and/or tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, or baricitinib** were NOT prescribed prior to completion of the full laboratory and instrumental workup, exclusion of oncological, hemato-oncological, and infectious diseases, and establishment of the JA diagnosis | C |
10 | Intra-articular administration of #betamethasone** in children over 3 years of age in accordance with the instructions for use or #triamcinolone in children over 12 years of age at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg (maximum dose 80 mg) for knee joints, 0.5–1 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) for ankle and elbow joints, and 0.3–0.5 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) for wrist joints, small joints of hands and feet was performed in patients with active mono- or oligoarthritis no more than once every 4 months | C |
11 | #Methylprednisolone** pulse therapy at a dose of 10–30 mg/kg/administration intravenously for 3 days, or 5 consecutive days if necessary, was performed in patients with febrile/hectic fever and polyarthritis accompanied by pain unresponsive to NSAIDs and marked functional impairment | C |
12 | Methotrexate** at a dose of 15 mg/m2/week once weekly subcutaneously or orally was prescribed to patients with active polyarthritis immediately after diagnosis verification in case of high disease activity, regardless of the presence of poor prognostic factors | B |
13 | Methotrexate** 15 mg/m2/week once weekly subcutaneously or orally was prescribed to patients with active polyarthritis immediately after diagnosis verification in case of moderate disease activity and the presence of poor prognostic factors | B |
14 | Methotrexate** 15 mg/m2/week once weekly subcutaneously or orally was prescribed to patients with active polyarthritis 1 month after starting NSAID treatment in case of low disease activity and the presence of poor prognostic factors, or moderate disease activity and the absence of poor prognostic factors | C |
15 | Upregulation of methotrexate** dose > 15 mg/m2/week (not exceeding 25 mg/week) was NOT performed in patients with active arthritis | C |
16 | Subcutaneous administration of methotrexate** was performed in patients with active arthritis | C |
17 | #Folic acid** at a dose of 1 mg daily except on the day of methotrexate** administration or 2.5–7.5 mg once weekly orally was prescribed during the period of methotrexate** therapy | C |
18 | Switching to #leflunomide** was performed in cases of methotrexate** intolerance or inefficacy in patients with seropositive polyarthritis | C |
19 | #Leflunomide** was prescribed orally: for children with a body weight < 20 kg – 10 mg daily on alternate days; for children with a body weight of 20–40 kg – 10 mg daily; for children with a body weight > 40 kg – 20 mg daily | C |
20 | Switching to a biologic DMARD or targeted synthetic DMARD was performed in cases of methotrexate** or #leflunomide** intolerance | C |
21 | Switching to one of the following drugs: TNF inhibitors, tocilizumab**, tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib**, abatacept** was performed in cases of methotrexate** or leflunomide** intolerance | B, B, C, B, C, B, B |
22 | A biologic DMARD or targeted synthetic DMARD was prescribed in combination with methotrexate** in case of its inefficacy, or with #leflunomide** in case of its inefficacy, or as monotherapy, or at any stage of treatment upon persistence/increase of disease activity | C |
23 | One of the following drugs: TNF inhibitors, tocilizumab**, tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib**, abatacept** was prescribed in combination with methotrexate** in case of its inefficacy or #leflunomide** in case of its inefficacy | B, C, B, C, C C, B, C, C, B, B, C |
24 | Prescribed one of the following drugs: citrate-free adalimumab** (40 mg/0.4 mL) subcutaneously once every 2 weeks for patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight of 10–30 kg – 20 mg, with body weight > 30 kg – 40 mg; or etanercept** lyophilizate for solution for subcutaneous administration for patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight of less than 62.5 kg at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg/administration twice a week or 0.8 mg/kg/administration once a week; or golimumab** for patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight < 40 kg – at a dose of 30 mg/m2 subcutaneously; ≥ 40 kg – 50 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide**, or as monotherapy | B,C |
25 | Prescribed tocilizumab** for children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg – at a dose of 8 mg/kg/administration intravenously once every 4 weeks or at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks; for children with a body weight < 30 kg – at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously once every 4 weeks or 162 mg subcutaneously once every 3 weeks in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide**, or as monotherapy | B,B,C,C,C |
26 | Prescribed tofacitinib** orally for patients aged ≥ 2 years with a body weight ≥ 40 kg at 5 mg twice daily (total daily dose 10 mg) or #upadacitinib** orally for patients aged ≥ 12 years with a body weight ≥ 40 kg at 15 mg once daily, or baricitinib** orally for patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight ≥ 10 kg to < 30 kg at 2 mg once daily, for children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg – at 4 mg once daily in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide**, or as monotherapy | B,B,C,C,C |
27 | Prescribed abatacept** intravenously for children older than 6 years with a body weight of less than 75 kg at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration, for children with a body weight of 75–100 kg – at a dose of 750 mg, for children with a body weight of more than 100 kg – at a dose of 1000 mg according to the schedule at weeks 0, 2, 4, then every 4 weeks in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide**, or as monotherapy | B,B,C |
28 | Switched to #rituximab** in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide** in case of inefficacy of TNF-alpha inhibitors, tocilizumab**, abatacept**, tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib** combined with methotrexate** or #leflunomide**, or as monotherapy | B,C |
29 | Switched to #rituximab** in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide** at any stage of treatment in case of intolerance to TNF-alpha inhibitors, tocilizumab**, abatacept**, tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib** | C |
30 | Prescribed #rituximab** at a dose of 375 mg/m2 of body surface area intravenously once a week for 4 consecutive weeks | C |
31 | Prescribed #rituximab** in combination with #co-trimoxazole** at a dose of 5 mg/kg based on trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily | C |
32 | Discontinued bDMARDs, tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib** in case of their intolerance and prescribed oral glucocorticoids at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide** | C |
33 | Additionally prescribed GCs: oral prednisolone** at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg per day or methylprednisolone** at a dose equivalent to prednisolone (not exceeding 60 mg/day) in case of inefficacy of methotrexate** or #leflunomide** in combination with bDMARDs or tofacitinib**, or #upadacitinib**, **, or baricitinib**, or upon increase in disease activity at any stage of treatment | C |
34 | Performed therapy adjustment (drug switching) until efficacy is achieved | C |
Table 5. Criteria for assessing the quality of treatment of pauciarticular juvenile arthritis (oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, persistent)
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Pathogenetic therapy was prescribed in the inpatient rheumatology department for all patients following diagnostic workup, including differential diagnosis, and establishment/confirmation of the JA diagnosis | C |
2 | Therapy adjustment (drug switching) was performed until efficacy or minimal/low disease activity was achieved in patients with long-standing disease, regardless of the drug used | C |
3 | Switching to another selective immunosuppressant (JAK inhibitor) and/or generic was performed exclusively for medical indications; automatic switching was not performed | C |
4 | Switching to another genetically engineered biologic drug and/or biosimilar was performed exclusively based on medical indications; automatic switching was not performed | C |
5 | Performed monitoring of the efficacy of any medicinal product used for pathogenetic therapy at 3 and 6 months, and then every 6 months of therapy (the drug is considered effective upon achieving a 50% improvement according to the ACRpedi criteria at 3 months, or the inactive disease stage at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria) | C |
6 | NSAID monotherapy for a duration of not more than 1 month was prescribed to patients with an unconfirmed JA diagnosis during the diagnostic workup stage | C |
7 | NSAIDs were prescribed to patients with a confirmed JA diagnosis | C |
8 | Performed NSAID monotherapy lasting no more than 2 months | C |
9 | Glucocorticoids orally and/or intravenously, and/or intra-articularly, methotrexate**, and/or bDMARDs (tocilizumab**, or adalimumab**, or etanercept**, or abatacept**, or #rituximab**) and/or tofacitinib**, or #upadacitinib**, or baricitinib** were not prescribed prior to completing a full laboratory and instrumental examination, ruling out oncological, onco-hematological, and infectious diseases, and establishing a diagnosis of JA | C |
10 | Performed intra-articular administration of #betamethasone** to children older than 3 years in accordance with the instructions for use, or #triamcinolone to children older than 12 years at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg (maximum dose 80 mg) when injected into the knee joints, 0.5–1 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the ankle and elbow joints, and 0.3–0.5 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the wrist joints, small joints of the hands and feet in patients with active mono- or oligoarthritis no more frequently than once every 4 months | C |
11 | Prescribed methotrexate** at a dose of 10–15 mg/m2/week once a week orally or subcutaneously to patients with active oligoarthritis immediately after diagnosis verification in case of high disease activity regardless of the presence of poor prognostic factors | C |
12 | Prescribed methotrexate** at a dose of 10–15 mg/m2/week once a week orally or subcutaneously to patients with active oligoarthritis immediately after diagnosis verification in case of moderate disease activity and the presence of poor prognostic factors | C |
13 | Prescribed methotrexate** at a dose of 10–15 mg/m2/week once a week orally or subcutaneously to patients with active oligoarthritis in case of inefficacy of NSAID treatment for 1–2 months and intra-articular GC administration (need for injections more frequently than once every 4 months), with low disease activity and the presence of poor prognostic factors, or with moderate disease activity and the absence of poor prognostic factors | C |
14 | Upregulation of methotrexate** dose > 15 mg/m2/week (not exceeding 25 mg/week) was NOT performed in patients with active arthritis | C |
15 | Subcutaneous administration of methotrexate** was performed in patients with active arthritis | C |
16 | #Folic acid** at a dose of 1 mg daily except on the day of methotrexate** administration or 2.5–7.5 mg once weekly orally was prescribed during the period of methotrexate** therapy | C |
17 | Switched to a bDMARD or selective immunosuppressant in case of methotrexate** intolerance | C |
18 | Switched to one of the following drugs: TNF-alpha inhibitors, #tocilizumab**, #tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib**, #abatacept** in case of methotrexate** intolerance | C,C,C,C,B,C |
19 | Prescribed a bDMARD or selective immunosuppressant in combination with methotrexate** in case of its inefficacy, or as monotherapy, or at any stage of treatment upon persistence/increase in disease activity | C |
20 | Prescribed one of the following drugs: TNF-alpha inhibitors, #tocilizumab**, #tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib**, #abatacept** in combination with methotrexate** in case of its inefficacy, or at any stage of treatment upon persistence/increase in disease activity | C,C,C,C,B,C |
21 | Prescribed one of the following drugs: citrate-free #adalimumab** (40 mg/0.4 mL) subcutaneously once every 2 weeks for patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight of 10–30 kg – 20 mg, with body weight > 30 kg – 40 mg; or #etanercept** at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg/administration twice a week or 0.8 mg/kg/administration once a week; or #golimumab** at a dose of 30 mg/m2 subcutaneously (maximum dose 50 mg) once every 4 weeks in combination with methotrexate**, or as monotherapy | C,C,C |
22 | Prescribed #tocilizumab** for children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg – at a dose of 8 mg/kg/administration intravenously once every 4 weeks or at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks; for children with a body weight < 30 kg – at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously once every 4 weeks or 162 mg subcutaneously once every 3 weeks in combination with methotrexate**, or as monotherapy | C |
23 | Prescribed #tofacitinib** orally at a dose of 5 mg twice daily (total daily dose 10 mg) or #upadacitinib** orally for patients aged ≥ 12 years with a body weight ≥ 40 kg at 15 mg once daily, baricitinib** orally for patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight ≥ 10 kg to < 30 kg at 2 mg once daily, for children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg – at 4 mg once daily in combination with methotrexate** or as monotherapy | C,C,B |
24 | Prescribed #abatacept** intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration according to the schedule at weeks 0, 2, 4, then every 4 weeks in combination with methotrexate** or as monotherapy | C |
25 | Switched to #rituximab** in combination with methotrexate** in case of inefficacy of TNF-alpha inhibitors, #tocilizumab**, #abatacept**, #tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib** combined with methotrexate** or as monotherapy | C |
26 | Switched to #rituximab** in combination with methotrexate** at any stage of treatment in case of intolerance to TNF-alpha inhibitors, #tocilizumab**, #abatacept** or #tofacitinib**, or #upadacitinib**, or baricitinib** at any stage of treatment | C |
27 | Prescribed #rituximab** at a dose of 375 mg/m2 of body surface area intravenously once a week for 4 consecutive weeks | C |
28 | Prescribed #rituximab** in combination with #co-trimoxazole** at a dose of 5 mg/kg based on trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily | C |
29 | Discontinued bDMARDs, #tofacitinib** or #upadacitinib**, or baricitinib** in case of their intolerance and prescribed oral glucocorticoids at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day in combination with methotrexate** | C |
30 | An additional prescription of GCs was administered: oral prednisolone** at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day or methylprednisolone** at a dose equivalent to prednisolone (not exceeding 60 mg/day) in case of methotrexate** ineffectiveness in combination with bDMARDs or #tofacitinib**, or #upadacitinib**, or baricitinib**, or upon an increase in disease activity at any stage of treatment | C |
31 | Performed therapy adjustment (drug switching) until efficacy is achieved | C |
Table 6. Criteria for assessing the quality of treatment of juvenile ankylosing spondylitis
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Pathogenetic therapy was prescribed in the inpatient rheumatology department for all patients following diagnostic workup, including differential diagnosis, and establishment/confirmation of the JA diagnosis | C |
2 | Therapy adjustment (drug switching) was performed until efficacy or minimal/low disease activity was achieved in patients with long-standing disease, regardless of the drug used | C |
3 | Switching to another selective immunosuppressant (JAK inhibitor) and/or generic was performed exclusively for medical indications; automatic switching was not performed | C |
4 | Switching to another genetically engineered biologic drug and/or biosimilar was performed exclusively based on medical indications; automatic switching was not performed | C |
5 | Performed monitoring of the efficacy of any medicinal product used for pathogenetic therapy at 3 and 6 months, and then every 6 months of therapy (the drug is considered effective upon achieving a 50% improvement according to the ACRpedi criteria at 3 months, or the inactive disease stage at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria) | C |
6 | NSAID monotherapy lasting no more than 1 month was prescribed to patients with an unconfirmed diagnosis of juvenile ankylosing spondylitis at the diagnostic stage | C |
7 | NSAIDs were prescribed to patients with a confirmed JA diagnosis | C |
8 | NSAID monotherapy with a duration of not more than 1 month was performed | C |
9 | Failure to prescribe oral and/or intravenous and/or intra-articular glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants (methotrexate** or #sulfasalazine**), and/or bDMARDs (#tocilizumab**, or #adalimumab**, or #etanercept**, or #golimumab**, or secukinumab**) and/or #tofacitinib**, or #upadacitinib**, or baricitinib** prior to the completion of a full laboratory and instrumental work-up and the exclusion of oncological, hemato-oncological, and infectious diseases | C |
10 | Intra-articular administration of #betamethasone** was performed in children older than 3 years in accordance with the instructions for use, or #triamcinolone in children older than 12 years at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg (maximum dose 80 mg) when injected into the knee joints, 0.5–1 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the ankle and elbow joints, and 0.3–0.5 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the wrist joints, small joints of the hands and feet in patients with active mono- or oligoarthritis no more frequently than once every 4 months | C |
11 | One of the following drugs was prescribed: methotrexate** at a dose of 10–15 mg/m2/week once a week orally or subcutaneously, or sulfasalazine** at a dose of 30–50 mg/kg/day orally to patients with peripheral arthritis immediately after verification of the diagnosis | C |
12 | Upregulation of methotrexate** dose > 15 mg/m2/week (not exceeding 25 mg/week) was NOT performed in patients with active arthritis | C |
13 | Subcutaneous administration of methotrexate** was performed in patients with active arthritis | C |
14 | #Folic acid** at a dose of 1 mg daily except on the day of methotrexate** administration or 2.5–7.5 mg once weekly orally was prescribed during the period of methotrexate** therapy | C |
15 | Switching to a bDMARD or targeted synthetic DMARD was performed in case of intolerance to methotrexate** or sulfasalazine** | C |
16 | Switching to one of the following drugs was performed: TNF-alpha inhibitors, secukinumab**, #tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib** in case of intolerance to sulfasalazine** or methotrexate** | B, B, C, C, B |
17 | A bDMARD or targeted synthetic DMARD was prescribed in combination with methotrexate** in case of its ineffectiveness, or #sulfasalazine** in case of its ineffectiveness, or as monotherapy, or at any stage of treatment upon persistence/increase of disease activity | C |
18 | One of the following drugs was prescribed: TNF-alpha inhibitors, secukinumab**, #tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib** while continuing the previously prescribed therapy with sulfasalazine** or #methotrexate**, or as monotherapy, or at any stage of treatment upon persistence/increase of disease activity | B, B, C, C, B |
19 | One of the following drugs was prescribed: citrate-free #adalimumab** (40 mg/0.4 ml) subcutaneously once every 2 weeks for patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight of 10–30 kg – 20 mg, with a body weight > 30 kg – 40 mg, or #etanercept** at a dose of 0.4 mg/kg/injection twice a week or 0.8 mg/kg/injection once a week, or #golimumab** at a dose of 30 mg/m2 subcutaneously (maximum dose 50 mg) once every 4 weeks in combination with sulfasalazine** or methotrexate**, or as monotherapy | C |
20 | Secukinumab** was prescribed to children with body weight > 50 kg at a dose of 75 mg, ≥ 50 kg at a dose of 150 mg at weeks 0, 1, 2, and 3, followed by monthly administration as a maintenance dose starting from week 4 subcutaneously in combination with sulfasalazine** or methotrexate**, or as monotherapy | C |
21 | #Tocilizumab** was prescribed in case of ineffectiveness and/or intolerance to TNF-alpha inhibitors, secukinumab**, #tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, baricitinib** to children with body weight ≥ 30 kg at a dose of 8 mg/kg/injection intravenously once every 4 weeks or at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks; to children with body weight < 30 kg at a dose of 10 mg/kg/injection intravenously once every 4 weeks or 162 mg subcutaneously once every 3 weeks in combination with methotrexate** or sulfasalazine**, or as monotherapy | C |
22 | #Tofacitinib** was prescribed orally at a dose of 5 mg twice a day (total daily dose 10 mg), or #upadacitinib** orally to patients aged ≥ 12 years and with a body weight ≥ 40 kg at 15 mg once a day, or baricitinib** orally to patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight ≥ 10 kg to < 30 kg at 2 mg once a day, and to children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg at 4 mg once a day in combination with sulfasalazine** or methotrexate**, or as monotherapy | C, C, B |
23 | Discontinuation of bDMARDs, tofacitinib**, upadacitinib**, or baricitinib** upon their intolerance and the prescription of oral glucocorticoids at a dose of 0.25–1.0 mg/kg/day in combination with sulfasalazine** or methotrexate** at any stage of treatment | C |
24 | An additional prescription of GCs was administered: oral prednisolone** at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day or methylprednisolone** at a dose equivalent to prednisolone (not exceeding 60 mg/day) in case of ineffectiveness of methotrexate** or sulfasalazine** in combination with bDMARDs or tofacitinib**, or #upadacitinib**, baricitinib**, or upon an increase in disease activity at any stage of treatment | C |
25 | Performed therapy adjustment (drug switching) until efficacy is achieved | C |
Table 7. Criteria for assessing the quality of treatment of juvenile arthritis-associated uveitis
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Local therapy was prescribed to all patients with juvenile arthritis-associated uveitis following an ophthalmologist's examination (consultation) | C |
2 | Switching of the initially prescribed immunosuppressant and/or targeted synthetic DMARD to a generic drug, and/or bDMARD to a biosimilar was performed exclusively when proven therapeutic efficacy and safety of the generic or biosimilar had been established in the pediatric patient population with a similar nosological form; automatic switching was not performed | C |
3 | A loading regimen with #dexamethasone** 1 drop 6 times a day was administered in combination with NSAID-containing drops (diclofenac**) 1–2 drops 4–6 times a day with a gradual dose reduction (1 drop once every 2 weeks) in the acute course of uveitis | C |
4 | Instillations of #dexamethasone** 1 drop 2–3 times a day with a gradual dose reduction (1 drop once every 2 weeks) in combination with instillations of NSAID-containing drops (1 drop 2–3 times a day with a gradual dose reduction, 1 drop once every 2 weeks) were performed in subacute and sluggish courses of uveitis | C |
5 | Parabulbar injections of #betamethasone** 0.5 ml once every 10–14 days were administered in the acute course of uveitis and severe panuveitis when local therapy was ineffective | C |
6 | #Tropicamide** was prescribed at 1–2 drops twice a day for 1 month (the course may be extended up to 2 months if necessary) in patients with iridolenticular synechiae | C |
7 | #Taurine** eye drops at 1–2 drops twice a day or #dexpanthenol** eye gel once a day under the eyelid at night were prescribed in courses of 2 months with 2-month intervals to patients with dystrophic changes in the eyes | C |
8 | #Methotrexate** was prescribed at a dose of 10–15 mg/m2/week orally or subcutaneously once a week in case of ineffectiveness of local uveitis treatment (failure to achieve remission within 3 months) or in severe uveitis (regardless of the duration of local therapy) | C |
9 | Failure to increase the dose of #methotrexate** > 15 mg/m2/week (not exceeding 25 mg/week) in patients with active uveitis | C |
10 | #Folic acid** was prescribed at a dose of 1 mg every day except on the day of #methotrexate** administration, or 2.5–7.5 mg once a week orally during the period of #methotrexate** therapy | C |
11 | Switching to one of the following drugs was performed at any stage of treatment: #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil**, or TNF-alpha inhibitors, or #tocilizumab**, or #tofacitinib**, or #upadacitinib**, or #baricitinib**, or #abatacept** in case of #methotrexate** intolerance | C, C, C, C, C, C, C |
12 | #Cyclosporine** was prescribed at a dose of 3–5 mg/kg/day orally in 2 divided doses combined with local therapy in case of #methotrexate** ineffectiveness in patients with low or moderate uveitis activity or upon an increase in uveitis activity at any stage of treatment, either as monotherapy or in combination with #methotrexate** | C |
13 | Monotherapy with #mycophenolate mofetil** was prescribed orally at a dose of 600 mg/m2/day in 2 divided doses combined with local therapy in case of #methotrexate** ineffectiveness and/or #cyclosporine** ineffectiveness as monotherapy or in combination with #methotrexate**, or upon an increase in uveitis activity at any stage of treatment | C |
14 | A TNF-alpha inhibitor (#adalimumab** or #golimumab**) was prescribed combined with local therapy in case of #methotrexate** ineffectiveness and/or #cyclosporine** ineffectiveness as monotherapy or in combination with #methotrexate**, or #mycophenolate mofetil** monotherapy, or upon an increase in uveitis activity at any stage of treatment | C |
15 | Immediate administration of a TNF-alpha inhibitor in combination with #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil** combined with local therapy was performed at any stage of treatment for severe uveitis, panuveitis, or risk of blindness | C |
16 | Administration of citrate-free #adalimumab** (40 mg/0.4 mL) was performed in patients aged ≥ 2 years with a body weight of 10–30 kg at a dose of 20 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks; > 30 kg at 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks, or #golimumab** at a dose of 30 mg/m2 (maximum dose 50 mg) subcutaneously every 4 weeks in combination with #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil** combined with local therapy | C, C |
17 | Switching from a TNF-alpha inhibitor to one of the following drugs with a novel mechanism of action: #tocilizumab**, #tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, #baricitinib**, #abatacept** was performed in case of inefficacy of the TNF-alpha inhibitor in combination with #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil**, or upon increase of uveitis activity at any stage of treatment | C, C, C |
18 | Administration of #tocilizumab** was performed in children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg at a dose of 8 mg/kg/infusion intravenously every 4 weeks or at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks; in children with a body weight < 30 kg at a dose of 10 mg/kg/infusion intravenously every 4 weeks or 162 mg subcutaneously every 3 weeks in combination with #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil** | C, C |
19 | Administration of #tofacitinib** orally at a dose of 5 mg twice daily (total daily dose 10 mg) or #upadacitinib** orally in patients ≥ 12 years and with a body weight ≥ 40 kg at 15 mg once daily, or #baricitinib** orally in patients ≥ 2 years with a body weight ≥ 10 kg to < 30 kg at 2 mg once daily, and in children with a body weight ≥ 30 kg at 4 mg once daily in combination with #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil** was performed | C |
20 | Administration of #abatacept** at a dose of 10 mg/kg/infusion intravenously on weeks 0, 2, and 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter in combination with #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil** was performed | C |
21 | Switching to #rituximab** in combination with #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil** was performed in case of inefficacy of TNF-alpha inhibitors, #tocilizumab**, #abatacept**, #tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, #baricitinib** combined with #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil**, or as monotherapy | C |
22 | Switching to #rituximab** in combination with #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil** was performed in case of intolerance to TNF-alpha inhibitors, #tocilizumab**, #abatacept**, #tofacitinib**, #upadacitinib**, #baricitinib** combined with #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil**, or as monotherapy | C |
23 | Administration of #rituximab** at a dose of 375 mg/m2 of body surface area intravenously once a week for 4 consecutive weeks was performed | C |
24 | Administration of #rituximab** in combination with #co-trimoxazole** (J01EE) at a dose of 5 mg/kg based on trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily was performed | C |
25 | Discontinuation of bDMARDs or #tofacitinib**, or #upadacitinib**, or #baricitinib** in case of intolerance and administration of oral glucocorticoids at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg daily combined with #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil** was performed | C |
26 | Additional administration of GCs: oral #prednisolone** or #methylprednisolone** at a dose of 0.25 mg/kg daily was performed in case of inefficacy of #methotrexate** and/or #cyclosporine**, or #mycophenolate mofetil** in combination with bDMARDs or #tofacitinib**, or #upadacitinib**, or #baricitinib**, or upon increase of uveitis activity at any stage of treatment | C |
Table 8. Quality assessment criteria for the treatment of juvenile arthritis with hemophagocytic syndrome
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Prescription and provision of therapy in a rheumatology inpatient setting were performed for all patients after diagnostics, including differential diagnostics, and establishment/confirmation of the diagnosis of juvenile arthritis with hemophagocytic syndrome | C |
2 | Prescription of targeted etiotropic therapy with systemic antibacterial and/or systemic antifungal and/or systemic antiviral drugs performed in patients with a known infectious etiological factor | C |
3 | Administration of GCs in combination with #cyclosporine** and #normal human immunoglobulin** was performed | C |
4 | Pulse therapy with #methylprednisolone** at a dose of 20–30 mg/kg/infusion intravenously or administration of #dexamethasone** at a dose of 10–20 mg/m²/day intravenously was performed | C |
5 | Gradual dose reduction of intravenous GCs after resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of HPS was performed according to the following regimens: #dexamethasone** starting from a dose of 10–20 mg/m2/day for 1–2 weeks, 5–10 mg/m2/day for 3–4 weeks, 2.5–5 mg/m2/day for 5–6 weeks, 1.25–2.5 mg/m2/day for 7–8 weeks; #methylprednisolone** starting from a dose of 20–30 mg/kg/infusion for 3–5 days with a 25% dose reduction every 2–3 days | C |
6 | Administration of #cyclosporine** at a dose of 3–5 mg/kg/day intravenously or orally was performed | C |
7 | Administration of #normal human immunoglobulin** at a dose of 1–2 g/kg/course was performed | C |
8 | Assessment of the efficacy of the applied HPS treatment regimen in accordance with criteria for achieving a therapeutic response (resolution of fever, reduction of spleen size, increase in blood platelet count ≥ 100×109/L, normalization of blood fibrinogen level, decrease in serum ferritin concentration by 25%) was performed every 48 hours | C |
9 | Administration of #anakinra** at 5–10 mg/kg/day intravenously in 2 divided doses for 3–10 days, longer if necessary, upon increase of HPS activity in the first 48 hours of GC therapy in combination with #cyclosporine** and #normal human immunoglobulin** was performed | C |
10 | Additional administration of #ruxolitinib** orally in children weighing up to 10 kg at 2.5 mg × 2 times/day; in children weighing 10 to 25 kg at 5 mg × 2 times/day; in children weighing ˃ 25 kg at 10 mg × 2 times/day, or #tofacitinib** orally at a dose of 10 mg × 2 times/day was performed in case of inefficacy of the combination of #anakinra** with GCs, #cyclosporine**, and #normal human immunoglobulin** | C |
11 | Switching to #rituximab** at a dose of 375 mg/m2 per week intravenously for 1–4 consecutive weeks was performed in case of inefficacy of the combination of #anakinra** with GCs, #cyclosporine**, #normal human immunoglobulin**, and #ruxolitinib** or #tofacitinib** | C |
12 | Administration of #co-trimoxazole** at a dose of 5 mg/kg based on trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily in combination with #rituximab** was performed | C |
13 | Administration of #prednisolone** at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg orally or #methylprednisolone** at an equivalent dose to prednisolone was performed in case of inefficacy of combined HPS therapy or HPS reactivation during reduction/withdrawal of intravenous GCs | C |
14 | Administration of #acyclovir** in children aged < 1 year at a dose of 10 mg/kg/infusion intravenously every 8 hours; in children aged ≥ 1 year at a dose of 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 8 hours was performed upon development of Herpes zoster | C |
15 | Administration of #acyclovir** at a dose of 5–10 mg/kg/infusion intravenously every 8 hours for 7–10 days was performed upon development of herpes simplex virus infection | C |
16 | Administration of #ganciclovir** at a dose of 6 mg/kg/infusion intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days was performed upon confirmation of active cytomegalovirus infection | C |
17 | Administration of #ganciclovir** at a dose of 10 mg/kg/infusion intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days was performed upon confirmation of active Epstein-Barr virus infection | C |
18 | Administration of #rituximab** as a first-line bDMARD in combination with #cyclosporine**, #normal human immunoglobulin**, and #co-trimoxazole** was performed in active Epstein-Barr virus infection | C |
19 | Antithrombotic agents were prescribed: drugs from the heparin group or direct factor Xa inhibitors; antiplatelet agents (except heparin); antifibrinolytic agents in case of hypercoagulation or development of coagulopathy | C |
20 | Blood transfusion performed upon the development of consumption coagulopathy or bleeding | C |
21 | Administration of the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously for 3–5 days (longer if necessary) was performed when the absolute neutrophil count dropped to ≤ 1.0×109/L | C |
22 | Scheduled administration of systemic antibacterial drugs in combination with systemic antifungal drugs was performed when the absolute neutrophil count dropped to ≤ 1.0×109/L until resolution of agranulocytosis | C |
23 | Empirical antibacterial therapy with systemic agents active against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic flora, and/or systemic antifungal agents, and/or systemic antiviral agents administered upon the development of sepsis/infectious complications prior to the confirmation of the etiological factor | C |
24 | Targeted therapy prescribed according to microbial susceptibility using systemic antibacterial drugs (combinations of penicillins, including combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins, and/or carbapenems, and/or other antibacterial drugs, and/or glycopeptide antibiotics, and/or other aminoglycosides) with or without systemic antifungal and/or systemic antiviral drugs upon confirmation of the etiological factor of sepsis/infectious complication | C |
25 | Treatment of HPS was performed until reaching an inactive stage (absence of fever, splenomegaly, cytopenia [Hb ≥ 90 g/L, platelets ≥ 100×109/L, neutrophils ≥ 0.5×109/L], blood triglyceride level < 3 mmol/L or < 265 mg/dL, ferritin ≤ 500 µg/L, normalization of cerebrospinal fluid parameters [in CNS involvement]) | C |
Table 9. Quality assessment criteria for follow-up examination of patients with juvenile arthritis in an inpatient/day care setting who initiated bDMARD/immunosuppressant therapy
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Assessment of treatment efficacy and safety of antirheumatic therapy was performed for all patients with a diagnosed juvenile arthritis in a rheumatology inpatient setting 3 months after initiating therapy, 6 months after initiating therapy, and every 6 months thereafter | C |
2 | A detailed general (clinical) blood test was performed (study of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, study of red blood cell level in blood, study of white blood cell level in blood, study of platelet level in blood, differential leukocyte count (leukocyte formula), study of total hemoglobin level in blood) | C |
3 | Discontinuation of bDMARD infusions and/or immunosuppressant injections/administration (for 7 days) was performed when platelet count dropped to ≤ 150 > 100×109/L or neutrophil count to < 1.5 ≥ 1.0×109/L in the complete (clinical) blood count | C |
4 | The immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD was discontinued when the absolute neutrophil count dropped below 1.0×109/L and/or the platelet count dropped below 100×109/L on a complete blood count | C |
5 | The colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 5-10 mcg/kg/day for leukopenia with an absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1.0×109/L for 3-5 days (or longer if necessary) until leukocyte and neutrophil counts completely normalized | C |
6 | The colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** was administered subcutaneously at 5-10 mcg/kg/day combined with intravenous systemic antibacterial drugs for febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) with an absolute neutrophil count ≤ 1.0×109/L | C |
7 | Systemic antibacterial therapy was continued in all patients with febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) | C |
8 | Treatment with the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD was resumed at the same dose after the neutrophil count recovered to ≥ 1.5×109/L according to the complete blood count | C |
9 | Adjustment of immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy was performed in the presence of data on recurrent episodes of decreased blood cell counts in the complete blood count | C |
10 | Administration of fluconazole** intravenously at 3–12 mg/kg/day depending on the severity and duration of induced neutropenia performed for patients with neutropenia | C |
11 | Performed tests for total blood protein, blood albumin, total blood bilirubin, free and conjugated blood bilirubin, blood creatinine, blood urea, blood uric acid, blood glucose, blood ferritin, blood triglycerides, blood cholesterol, blood sodium, blood potassium, total blood calcium, blood lactate dehydrogenase activity, blood aspartate aminotransferase activity, blood alanine aminotransferase activity, blood gamma-glutamyl transferase activity, blood alkaline phosphatase activity, serum iron, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood creatine kinase activity, pancreatic amylase activity, and lipase activity | C |
12 | Temporary discontinuation of the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD was performed in case of an increase in serum ALT and/or AST levels $\ge 1.5$ times above the upper limit of normal and/or an increase in total bilirubin, free (unconjugated) and/or bound (conjugated) bilirubin, and/or urea, and/or creatinine, and/or uric acid, and/or other biochemical parameter(s) above the upper limit of normal | C |
13 | Resumption of therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD at the same dose was performed after normalization of general clinical blood chemistry parameters | C |
14 | Adjustment of therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD was performed in the presence of data on repeated episodes of elevation of biochemical parameter(s) | C |
15 | A study of the C-reactive protein level in blood serum was performed | C |
16 | Blood procalcitonin levels were measured in patients with suspected infectious complications | C |
17 | A set of tests was performed to rule out sepsis (comprehensive complete blood count, standard biochemical blood test, serum C-reactive protein level, blood culture for sterility, microbiological [culture] examination of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal swabs for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, urine culture for bacterial pathogens using automated inoculation, microbiological [culture] examination of anal discharge with antimicrobial susceptibility testing, thromboelastography, coagulogram [screening hemostasis test]; chest computed tomography, comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, renal ultrasound, echocardiography, abdominal MRI, pelvic MRI, retroperitoneal MRI) in patients with febrile or hectic fever, leukocytosis/leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels not related to JIA activity | C |
18 | Empiric antibacterial therapy was prescribed initially, followed subsequently, depending on the clinical situation, by intravenous systemic antibacterial drugs targeting gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins, and/or carbapenems, and/or other antibacterial drugs, and/or glycopeptide antibiotics, and/or other aminoglycosides, and/or macrolides) with or without systemic antifungal drugs based on microbial susceptibility testing, combined with #normal human immunoglobulin** at a dose of 400 mg/kg/course (5 days) in the event of sepsis | C |
19 | The immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD was temporarily discontinued, and previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids were continued throughout the course of etiotropic therapy in the event of sepsis or an infectious complication | C |
20 | Resumption of therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD was performed no earlier than one week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of sepsis and completion of antibacterial therapy | C |
21 | Prothrombin index, soluble fibrin monomer complexes in blood, prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, blood plasminogen level, blood fibrinogen level, blood D-dimer concentration, von Willebrand factor activity and properties in blood, and antithrombin III activity in blood were determined in patients with signs of vasculitis and/or sepsis and/or sMAS | C |
22 | Thromboelastography was performed in patients with signs of vasculitis and/or sepsis and/or sMAS, signs of hyper- and/or hypocoagulation, who were receiving antithrombotic therapy | C |
23 | Blood heparin levels were measured in patients with vasculitis | C |
24 | Performed prescription/adjustment of therapy with antithrombotic agents: heparin group drugs or direct factor Xa inhibitors; antiplatelet agents other than heparin; antifibrinolytic agents in the event of coagulopathy or disseminated intravascular coagulation based on coagulogram (screening hemostasis test) and thromboelastogram data | C |
25 | Blood transfusion was performed in accordance with indications in patients with consumption coagulopathy/bleeding | C |
26 | Determination of blood rheumatoid factor (RF), blood anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP), and antibodies to cell nuclear antigens and DNA | C |
27 | A study of immunoglobulin levels in blood was performed | C |
28 | #Normal human immunoglobulin** was administered at a dose of 400 mg/kg, or 500 mg/kg if adequate blood immunoglobulin levels were not achieved, at least once every 2-4 weeks until blood immunoglobulin levels normalized in case of hypogammaglobulinemia | C |
29 | A scheduled infusion of #rituximab** was skipped, immunosuppressant treatment was continued, and previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids were maintained in the event of decreased blood immunoglobulin levels | C |
30 | #Rituximab** infusions were resumed after blood immunoglobulin levels recovered | |
31 | Lymphocyte subset analysis was performed in all patients receiving #rituximab** as well as in patients with frequent viral and purulent bacterial infections, including opportunistic infections | C |
32 | Quantitative PCR assay for Epstein-Barr virus DNA in peripheral and cord blood, qualitative PCR assay for Epstein-Barr virus DNA in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative PCR assay for Epstein-Barr virus DNA in urine were performed in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes were detected on chest computed tomography | C |
33 | Quantitative PCR assay for cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus) DNA in peripheral and cord blood, qualitative PCR assay for cytomegalovirus DNA in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative PCR assay for cytomegalovirus DNA in urine were performed in patients with clinical manifestations of cytomegalovirus infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes were detected on chest computed tomography | C |
34 | Quantitative PCR assay for herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA in blood, qualitative PCR assay for herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative PCR assay for herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in urine were performed in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes were detected on chest computed tomography | C |
35 | Blood IgM and IgG antibodies to cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus) were determined in patients with clinical manifestations of cytomegalovirus infection and/o fever, and/or when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes were detected on chest computed tomography | C |
36 | Blood IgM and IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus were determined in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes were detected on chest computed tomography | C |
37 | Antibodies to the Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen (VCA) in blood were determined in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes were detected on chest computed tomography | C |
38 | Blood IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus early antigens (EA) were determined in patients with clinical manifestations of Epstein-Barr virus infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes were detected on chest computed tomography | C |
39 | Antibodies to herpes simplex virus (Herpes simplex virus) in blood were determined in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection and/or fever, and/or when interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes were detected on chest computed tomography | C |
40 | Prescribed #acyclovir** at a dose of 200 mg orally 5 times a day (maximum 1000 mg/day) in children older than 2 years, or at a dose of 5-10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 8 hours for localized herpes simplex infection; prescribed #acyclovir** at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 8 hours in children aged < 1 year; at a dose of 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 8 hours in children aged ≥ 1 year with Herpes zoster | C |
41 | Prescribed #ganciclovir** at a dose of 6 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14-21 days for cytomegalovirus infection, or #ganciclovir** at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14-21 days for Epstein-Barr virus infection | C |
42 | Temporary discontinuation of immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs was performed in all patients upon the development of herpesvirus infection | C |
43 | Resumption of therapy with immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs was performed in all patients no earlier than 1 week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of infection and completion of antiviral therapy | C |
44 | Performed screening for the presence/absence of tuberculosis (tuberculin skin test, recombinant tuberculosis allergen test in standard dilution**, blood interferon-gamma release assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, chest computed tomography) in all patients receiving biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants with or without glucocorticoids at least twice a year | C |
45 | Discontinued immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD therapy in all patients with a positive intradermal tuberculin test (papule > 5 mm) and/or elevated interferon-gamma levels, and/or lung lesions, and/or intrathoracic lymph node involvement | C |
46 | Performed initial consultation (examination) by a phthisiatrician in patients with a positive focal tuberculin skin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculous allergen, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels specific to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or lung and/or intrathoracic lymph node lesions | C |
47 | Prescribed oral GCs to all patients during a flare of juvenile arthritis for the duration of specific antituberculosis therapy | C |
48 | Resumption of therapy with immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs was performed in all patients after completing specific antituberculosis therapy and consulting a phthisiatrician | C |
49 | Performed determination of antibodies to Salmonella enterica in blood, determination of antibodies to Salmonella typhi in blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in blood, determination of antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica serovars in blood | C |
50 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella boydii in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella dysenteriae in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella sonnei in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella flexneri in the blood was performed | C |
51 | Administered etiotropic therapy upon detection of diagnostic titers of IgA and IgM antibodies, as well as high titers of IgG antibodies to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, Yersinia enterocolitica serovars, Salmonella enterica, Salmonella typhi, Shigella boydii, Shigella dysenteriae, Shigella sonnei, and Shigella flexneri in the blood | C |
52 | Determined blood IgA, IgM, and IgG antibodies to Chlamydia psittaci; determined blood antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis; determined blood antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae; determined blood IgM and IgG antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae | C |
53 | Administered etiotropic therapy upon detection of diagnostic titers of IgA and IgM antibodies, as well as high titers of IgG antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydia psittaci, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae in the blood | C |
54 | Microbiological (culture) examination of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal swabs for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms was performed | C |
55 | General (clinical) urinalysis and Nechyporenko urine test were performed | C |
56 | Electrocardiogram recording performed | C |
57 | Holter ECG monitoring was performed in patients with arrhythmia or pathological electrocardiographic findings | C |
58 | Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed in patients with arterial hypertension | C |
59 | A comprehensive ultrasound examination of internal organs (including comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and renal ultrasound) was performed | C |
60 | Echocardiography performed | C |
61 | Performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without anesthetic management (including early postoperative care) in patients receiving NSAIDs and/or glucocorticoids, and in patients with dyspeptic symptoms | C |
62 | Microbiological (culture) examination of gastric mucosa biopsy specimens for Helicobacter pylori was performed in patients with inflammatory and/or erosive and/or ulcerative changes according to esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings | C |
63 | Prescription of medications for the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease has been made upon detection of reflux disease and/or inflammatory gastropathy, erosive and/or ulcerative processes in the esophagus and/or stomach and/or duodenum | C |
64 | Administered eradication therapy including proton pump inhibitors, systemic antibacterial drugs, and bismuth tripotassium dicitrate** at a dose of 8 mg/kg/day in 1-2 doses (for patients aged 4 to 8 years) for 4-8 weeks, at a dose of 120 mg twice daily (for patients aged 8 to 12 years), or at a dose of 120 mg 4 times daily or 240 mg twice daily (for patients older than 12 years) for inflammatory gastropathy, erosive and/or ulcerative lesions of the stomach and/or duodenum associated with Helicobacter pylori | C |
65 | Temporary discontinuation of immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs was performed in all patients for the duration of eradication therapy | C |
66 | Performed magnetic resonance imaging of joints (single joint) with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) | C |
67 | Performed computed tomography of the chest organs with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) | C |
68 | Performed bronchoscopy with anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients with interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes detected on chest computed tomography | C |
69 | Microbiological (cultural) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis carinii cysts performed in all patients when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative pulmonary changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
70 | Performed quantitative PCR assay for Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in sputum, endotracheal aspirate, or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in all patients presenting with interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
71 | Performed detection of anti-Pneumocystis jirovecii IgM and IgG antibodies in all patients presenting with interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
72 | Microbiological (culture) sputum examination for fungi (yeasts and molds) was performed in all patients presenting with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
73 | Performed microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeasts and molds) in all patients presenting with interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
74 | Microbiological (culture) examination of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms was performed in all patients presenting with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
75 | Determination of antibodies to Aspergillus spp. in blood was performed in all patients presenting with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
76 | Determination of mannan and galactomannan in lavage fluid and blood was performed in all patients presenting with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
77 | PCR determination of Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid performed in all patients when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative pulmonary changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
78 | Cytomegalovirus DNA detection in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR was performed in all patients presenting with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography | C |
79 | PCR determination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG) DNA with species differentiation in sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, or bronchial washings performed in all patients when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative pulmonary changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
80 | Prescribed empirical antibacterial therapy: #cotrimoxazole** combined with systemic antibacterial drugs targeting Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins, and/or carbapenems, and/or other antibacterial drugs) along with systemic antifungal drugs, pending identification of the etiological factor of interstitial pneumonia, depending on the clinical situation | C |
81 | Prescribed targeted antibacterial therapy: #cotrimoxazole** combined with systemic antibacterial drugs targeting Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins, and/or carbapenems, and/or other antibacterial drugs) along with systemic antifungal drugs and systemic antiviral drugs upon confirmation of the etiological factor of pneumonia, depending on the clinical situation | C |
82 | Prescribed intravenous GCs, #cotrimoxazole** at a dose of 3.75-5.0 mg/kg body weight/administration (15-20 mg/kg/day) (calculated for trimethoprim) intravenously every 8 hours for moderately severe Pneumocystis pneumonia, or at a dose of 3.75-5.0 mg/kg body weight/administration (15-20 mg/kg/day) (calculated for trimethoprim) intravenously every 6-8 hours for severe Pneumocystis pneumonia | C |
83 | Prescribed #voriconazole** at a dose of 6 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for the first 24 hours, followed by 4 mg/kg starting from the second day, upon detection of galactomannan in lavage fluid and/or blood, and/or antibodies to Aspergillus spp. in the blood | C |
84 | Prescribed intravenous fluconazole** at a dose of 6-12 mg/kg/day upon detection of mannan in lavage fluid and/or blood | C |
85 | Prescribed systemic antibacterial drugs targeting Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins, and/or carbapenems, and/or other antibacterial drugs) combined with systemic antifungal drugs in the event of focal, lobar, or multilobar pneumonia | C |
86 | Temporary discontinuation of therapy with biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants was performed in all patients upon suspected/developed pneumonia | C |
87 | Resumed bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy in all patients no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of pneumonia confirmed by laboratory tests, follow-up chest computed tomography with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy | C |
88 | Performed radiography of the temporomandibular joint and/or intervertebral articulations, and/or elbow joint, and/or wrist joint, and/or knee joint, and/or shoulder joint, and/or hip joint, and/or ankle joint, and/or acromioclavicular articulation, and/or sternoclavicular articulation, and/or hand, and/or foot in two projections, or joint computed tomography with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients with a history of active arthritis | C |
89 | Performed X-ray densitometry in all patients receiving or previously receiving corticosteroids | C |
90 | Administered calcium and vitamin D supplements and their analogues to patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis | C |
91 | Prescribed #pamidronic acid or #alendronic acid**, or #zoledronic acid**, or #ibandronic acid | C |
92 | Prescribed bisphosphonates in the following regimens: #pamidronic acid in patients < 1 year at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg IV every 2 months; in patients aged 1-2 years at a dose of 0.25-0.5 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 3 months; in patients aged 2-3 years at a dose of 0.375-0.75 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 3 months; in patients older than 3 years at a dose of 0.5-1 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 4 months (maximum dose 60 mg/administration); or #alendronic acid** at a dose of 1-2 mg/kg/week orally, in patients with body weight < 40 kg at a dose of 5 mg/day or 35 mg/week, in patients with body weight > 40 kg at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day or 70 mg/week (maximum dose 70 mg/week); or #zoledronic acid** at a dose of 0.0125-0.05 mg/kg/administration IV every 6-12 months (maximum dose 4 mg) for the treatment of osteoporosis; or #ibandronic acid at a dose of 3 mg/administration IV once every 3 months or 150 mg orally once a month | C |
93 | Performed pre-exposure prophylaxis for novel coronavirus infection in patients aged 12 years and older with a body weight of at least 40 kg, prior to initiating or at any stage of therapy with immunosuppressants, bDMARDs, and/or GCs, using passive immunization with antiviral monoclonal antibody preparations | C |
94 | Administered pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate adsorbed vaccine** containing capsular polysaccharides of 13 pneumococcal serotypes prior to or at any stage of therapy with immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs, with or without GCs | C |
95 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by anotorhinolaryngologist was completed. | C |
96 | Performed initial dental consultation (examination) by a pediatric dentist in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs with or without GCs | C |
97 | Initial ophthalmologist consultation (examination) with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy was performed | C |
98 | An initial consultation (examination) by a pediatric cardiologist was performed in patients with cardiac dysfunction and/or arterial hypertension | C |
99 | Performed initial consultation (examination) by a phthisiatrician in all patients with a positive focal tuberculin skin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculous allergen, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels specific to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or focal and infiltrative lung changes | C |
100 | Performed initial consultation (examination) by a pediatric endocrinologist in patients with endocrine pathology, including those receiving GCs | C |
101 | Initial dietitian consultation (examination) was performed in patients with underweight, amyotrophy, osteopenia/osteoporosis, constitutional obesity and Cushing's syndrome, or steroid diabetes | C |
102 | Performed initial consultation (examination) by an orthopedic traumatologist in all patients with joint functional impairment, impaired longitudinal bone growth, subluxations, or back pain | C |
103 | Performed initial consultation (examination) by a neurologist in patients with neurological symptoms, psychomotor developmental delay, or psychotic reactions | C |
104 | Follow-up neurology consultation (examination, assessment) performed for patients with neurological symptoms, psychomotor retardation, or psychotic reactions to evaluate treatment efficacy | C |
105 | Initial medical psychology consultation (testing, assessment) performed for all patients aged 1 year and older and their parents | A |
106 | Performed initial consultation (examination) by a physical therapy physician in all patients with functional impairment | C |
107 | Performed follow-up consultation (examination) by a physical therapy physician in patients after completing a physical therapy program | C |
108 | Performed initial examination (consultation) by a sports medicine / exercise therapy physician in all patients with functional impairment | C |
109 | Performed medical rehabilitation in all patients with functional impairment | C |
110 | Follow-up physical therapy consultation (examination, assessment) performed for all patients with functional impairment upon completion of the rehabilitation program | C |
111 | Performed adjustment of anti-rheumatic therapy in the inpatient rheumatology department that initiated bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant treatment, if the inactive disease state is not achieved by 6 months, remission by 12 months, and subsequently every 6 months | C |
112 | Anti-rheumatic therapy was adjusted in the inpatient rheumatology department that initiated biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and/or immunosuppressants at any stage of treatment upon the development of adverse events associated with bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy | C |
113 | Onco-vigilance maintained due to the potential development of oncological, onco-hematological, or lymphoproliferative disorders secondary to bDMARD therapy at any stage of treatment | C |
114 | Immediate discontinuation of the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD and hospitalization of the patient upon suspicion of an oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative disease | C |
115 | Obtained a bone marrow cytological specimen via puncture with anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) and a bone marrow histological specimen with cytological examination of bone marrow smear (myelogram), alongside pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course | C |
116 | Performed lymph node biopsy (peripheral, or intra-abdominal/intrathoracic as indicated) with anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), including cytological examination of tissue preparation and pathomorphological examination of biopsy (surgical) material of the lymph node in patients with marked enlargement of peripheral, intrathoracic, and/or intra-abdominal lymph nodes receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course | C |
117 | Performed intravenous bolus contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course | C |
118 | Performed contrast-enhanced brain MRI, intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI, intravenous contrast-enhanced retroperitoneal MRI, and intravenous contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course | C |
119 | Performed intravenous contrast-enhanced bone MRI (one region) and joint MRI (one joint) with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course | C |
120 | Performed computed tomography of the bone and joint with or without anesthetic management (including early postoperative care) in patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs who present with atypical bone destruction lesions not characteristic of juvenile arthritis | C |
121 | Performed positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals), with contrast enhancement if necessary; whole-body positron emission tomography with tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD who present with severe arthralgia, myalgia, ossalgia, bone destruction, subcutaneous fat infiltrates, or lesions in parenchymal organs, the brain, or spinal cord | C |
122 | Performed multi-site bone scintigraphy with or without anesthetic management (including early postoperative care) in patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs who present with atypical bone destruction lesions not characteristic of juvenile arthritis | C |
123 | CT-guided pelvic bone trephine biopsy with anesthetic management (including early postoperative management), with pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods; cytological examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; immunocytochemical examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; immunophenotyping of bone marrow hematopoietic progenitor cells in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD with an atypical disease course | C |
124 | Performed bone biopsy with anesthetic management (including early postoperative care) along with pathomorphological examination of bone tissue biopsy (surgical) material in patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs who present with atypical bone destruction lesions not characteristic of juvenile arthritis | C |
125 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a pediatric oncologist for patients with suspected/confirmed oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative disease or metastatic lesion based on examination results | C |
Table 10. Criteria for assessing the quality of dispensary follow-up control in patients with juvenile arthritis in outpatient settings
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Performed initial rheumatologist consultation (examination) | C |
2 | Performed follow-up rheumatologist consultation (examination, assessment) (evaluating therapy efficacy and safety at least once a month after therapy initiation/adjustment and at least once every 3 months after achieving disease remission; assessing the need for referral to an unscheduled hospitalization in the rheumatology department of the inpatient facility that initiated biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) and/or immunosuppressive therapy at any stage of treatment upon development of a flare/complications, comorbid conditions, complications/side effects/persistent intolerance to therapy; and referring for planned hospitalization to the rheumatology department of the inpatient facility that initiated bDMARD and/or immunosuppressive therapy at 3 and 6 months after prescription/adjustment of therapy and subsequently every 6 months, along with conducting a remote consultation with a staff rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated therapy for all patients upon development of any signs of therapy inefficacy and/or intolerance) | C |
3 | Performed pediatrician consultation (examination) | C |
4 | Follow-up consultation (examination) by a pediatrician or district pediatrician performed for patients with juvenile arthritis in the absence of a local rheumatologist at least once a month after initiation/adjustment of therapy and at least once every 3 months after achieving disease remission | C |
5 | Switching initially prescribed immunosuppressants and/or selective immunosuppressants to a generic, and/or bDMARDs to a biosimilar, is performed exclusively upon proven therapeutic efficacy and safety of the generic or biosimilar in the pediatric population of patients with a similar nosological form | C |
6 | Performed immediate discontinuation of bDMARD infusion/injection and/or immunosuppressant injection/administration in the event of an allergic reaction of any severity | C |
7 | Prescription of systemic antihistamines and/or GCs performed upon the development of an allergic reaction to the administration of bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants | C |
8 | Consultation (examination, including remote) by a rheumatologist from the inpatient facility that initiated therapy performed for all patients upon the development of an allergic reaction to the intake and/or administration of bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants | C |
9 | Emergency hospitalization was performed in the event of an allergic reaction to the administration and/or infusion of a bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant | C |
10 | Complete blood count (CBC) with differential (erythrocyte sedimentation rate determination, red blood cell count, leukocyte count, platelet count, differential leukocyte count), and total hemoglobin level determination was performed at least once every 2–4 weeks | C |
11 | Performed discontinuation of the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD, continued administration of previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids (GCs) when platelet count is ≤ 150 > 100×109/L and neutrophil count is < 1.5 ≥ 1.0×109/L according to a complete blood count with differential | C |
12 | Performed administration of the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously when leukocyte count decreases with an absolute neutrophil count < 1.0×109/L for 3–5 days (or longer if necessary) | C |
13 | Performed administration of the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously, urgent hospitalization to a local inpatient facility, and administration of systemic antibacterial drugs intravenously upon development of febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) with an absolute neutrophil count < 1.0×109/L | C |
14 | Performed continuation of immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy at the previous dose after normalization of complete blood count parameters and an increase in blood neutrophil count to ≥ 1.5×109/L | C |
15 | Performed administration of fluconazole** 3–12 mg/kg/day orally depending on the severity and duration of induced neutropenia in patients with neutropenia | C |
16 | Performed consultation (examination, including remote) by a rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated therapy upon a repeat episode of decreased neutrophil count, development of febrile neutropenia, and/or decreased blood platelet count according to a complete blood count | C |
17 | Determination of total blood protein, blood albumin, total blood bilirubin, free and conjugated blood bilirubin, blood creatinine, blood urea, blood uric acid, blood glucose, blood ferritin, blood triglycerides, blood cholesterol, blood sodium, blood potassium, total blood calcium, blood lactate dehydrogenase activity, aspartate aminotransferase activity, alanine aminotransferase activity, gamma-glutamyltransferase activity, alkaline phosphatase activity, and serum iron was performed at least once every 2–4 weeks | C |
18 | Temporary discontinuation of immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy, with continuation of previously prescribed oral GCs, performed when ALT and AST activity in the blood exceeds the upper limit of normal by ≥ 1.5 times and/or other biochemical parameters exceed the upper limit of normal | C |
19 | Continuation of immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy at the same dose performed after normalization of the biochemical parameter(s) | C |
20 | Consultation (examination, including remote) by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated therapy was performed when data indicated repeated elevations of blood biochemical parameter(s) | C |
21 | Performed determination of rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP) in the blood at least once every 3 months in patients with seropositive juvenile arthritis | C |
22 | Performed determination of anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-DNA antibodies in the blood of patients receiving TNF-alpha inhibitors at least once every 3 months | C |
23 | Performed discontinuation of TNF-alpha inhibitor therapy, continued administration of previously prescribed subcutaneous or oral immunosuppressant and/or oral GCs upon an increase in anti-nuclear and anti-DNA antibodies in blood serum | C |
24 | Consultation (examination, including remote) by a rheumatologist from the inpatient facility that initiated therapy performed upon an increase in antinuclear and anti-DNA antibody levels in blood serum | C |
25 | Serum C-reactive protein level test was performed at least once every 3 months | C |
26 | Assessment of blood immunoglobulin levels performed at least once every 3 months | C |
27 | Temporary discontinuation of bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy, with continuation of previously prescribed oral GCs, was performed upon a decrease in blood immunoglobulin levels | C |
28 | Performed consultation (examination, including remote) by a rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated therapy upon a decrease in blood immunoglobulin levels | C |
29 | Hospitalization was performed for patients with decreased blood immunoglobulin levels | C |
30 | Determination of antistreptolysin-O in blood serum was performed at least once every 3 months | C |
31 | Temporary discontinuation of immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy, with continuation of previously prescribed oral GCs, performed upon the appearance of signs of an infectious complication | C |
32 | Performed consultation (examination, including remote) by a rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated therapy upon the appearance of signs of an infectious complication | C |
33 | Emergency hospitalization of the patient to an inpatient facility performed upon suspected/developed pneumonia | C |
34 | Temporary discontinuation of bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy, with continuation of previously prescribed oral GCs, was performed upon suspicion/development of pneumonia | C |
35 | Performed consultation (examination, including remote) by a rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated therapy upon suspicion/development of pneumonia | C |
36 | Performed administration of #acyclovir** at a dose of 200 mg orally 5 times a day in children older than 2 years (maximum 1000 mg/day) upon the development of localized herpetic infection | C |
37 | Performed temporary discontinuation of bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy and continued administration of previously prescribed oral GCs upon the development of herpesvirus infection for the entire duration of antiviral therapy | C |
38 | Inpatient hospitalization was performed upon generalization of herpetic infection / suspected cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus infection | C |
39 | Resumption of immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD therapy performed for all patients no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of infection and completion of antiviral therapy | C |
40 | No vaccination with live or live-attenuated vaccines was performed in patients receiving bDMARDs | C |
41 | Vaccination of children was performed exclusively during disease remission, provided it is maintained for at least 6 months, according to an individual schedule, excluding live vaccines | C |
42 | Monitoring of the efficacy of biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants performed | C |
43 | Monitoring of the tolerability of biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants performed | C |
44 | Consultation (examination, including remote) by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated therapy was performed for all patients upon the development of any signs of intolerance to the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD | C |
45 | Performed consultation (examination, including remote) by a staff rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated therapy upon an increase in clinical and/or laboratory indicators of disease activity and/or development of any signs of immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD intolerance | C |
46 | Focal tuberculin skin testing (Mantoux test, or test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen in standard dilution**) was performed at least once every 6 months (more frequently if clinically indicated) | C |
47 | Performed routine urinalysis and Nechyporenko urine test at least once a month | C |
48 | Performed discontinuation of methotrexate** therapy, continued bDMARD therapy, and continued administration of previously prescribed oral GCs upon the appearance of hematuria | C |
49 | Performed consultation (examination, including remote) by a staff rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated therapy upon the appearance of hematuria | C |
50 | Electrocardiography was performed at least once every 3 months | C |
51 | Performed abdominal ultrasound (comprehensive), echocardiography, and kidney ultrasound at least once every 6 months. | C |
52 | Initial outpatient consultation (examination, assessment) by an otorhinolaryngologist- (for patients with ENT pathology, no later than 7 days after hospital discharge) | C |
53 | Follow-up dispensary consultation (examination, assessment) by an otorhinolaryngologist- (at least once every 6 months) | C |
54 | Initial outpatient consultation (examination, assessment) by a pediatric cardiologist- based on medical indications | C |
55 | Follow-up dispensary consultation (examination, assessment) by a pediatric cardiologist- based on medical indications | C |
56 | Initial outpatient consultation (examination, assessment) by a pediatric dentist- for patients requiring sanitation of chronic infection foci and treatment of acute oral cavity infections | C |
57 | Follow-up dispensary consultation (examination, assessment) by a pediatric dentist- based on medical indications | C |
58 | Initial outpatient consultation (examination, assessment) by an ophthalmologist- (including ocular biomicroscopy no later than 7 days after hospital discharge for patients with ophthalmological pathology) | C |
59 | Follow-up consultation (examination, assessment) by an ophthalmologist- with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy for all patients with ophthalmological pathology according to individual indications | C |
60 | Performed routine clinical examination (consultation) by an ophthalmologist- (including eye biomicroscopy, at least once every 3 months) | C |
61 | Initial medical appointment (examination, consultation) by a nutritionist for medical indications- | C |
62 | Follow-up medical appointment (examination, consultation) by a nutritionist for individual indications- | C |
63 | Initial medical appointment (examination, consultation) by a phthisiatrician (in the presence of a positive focal test and/or intradermal test with tuberculosis allergen using tuberculin, and/or with infiltrative lung lesions)- | C |
64 | An examination (consultation, including remote) by the hospital rheumatologist who initiated the therapy was performed in patients with a positive intradermal tuberculin test | C |
65 | Follow-up medical appointment (examination, consultation) by a phthisiatrician for patients with a positive focal tuberculin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculosis allergen, and/or an elevated blood interferon-gamma level to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or focal or infiltrative lung changes- | C |
66 | Initial medical appointment (examination, consultation) by a pediatric endocrinologist for medical indications- | C |
67 | Follow-up dispensary medical appointment (examination, consultation) by a pediatric endocrinologist for medical indications- | C |
68 | Performed initial trauma and orthopedic surgeon consultation (examination) according to medical indications | C |
69 | Performed follow-up trauma and orthopedic surgeon consultation (examination) according to medical indications | C |
70 | Follow-up dispensary medical appointment (examination, consultation) by an orthopedic traumatologist for medical indications-- | C |
71 | An initial examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist was performed according to medical indications | C |
72 | Performed follow-up medical psychologist consultation (testing, examination) according to medical indications after completion of the psychological rehabilitation program | C |
73 | Performed follow-up dispensary medical psychologist consultation (testing, examination) according to medical indications | C |
74 | Performed initial physical therapy physician consultation (examination) according to medical indications | C |
75 | Performed an initial consultation/examination by a sports medicine and exercise therapy physician based on medical indications | C |
76 | Performed medical rehabilitation in all patients with functional impairment | C |
77 | Follow-up medical appointment (examination, consultation) by a physical therapy doctor for all patients who have completed the medical rehabilitation program- | C |
78 | Performed follow-up exercise therapy physician consultation (examination) for all patients who completed the medical rehabilitation program | C |
79 | Performed follow-up dispensary exercise therapy physician consultation (examination) according to medical indications | C |
80 | Unscheduled hospitalization, based on indications, to the rheumatology department of the hospital that initiated biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)/immunosuppressant therapy at any stage of treatment in the event of exacerbation/complications of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, comorbid conditions, or complications/side effects/persistent intolerance to bDMARDs/immunosuppressants | C |
81 | Scheduled hospitalization to the rheumatology department of the hospital that initiated bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy for all patients 3 and 6 months after therapy initiation, and every 6 months thereafter | C |
References
Show references
Petty RE, Laxer RM, Lindsley CB, et al. Textbook of pediatric rheumatology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Inc 2020.
Zaripova LN, Midgley A, Christmas SE, et al. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: from aetiopathogenesis to therapeutic approaches. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2021;19:135. doi: 10.1186/s12969-021-00629-8
Baranov AA, Alekseeva EI, editors. Rheumatic diseases in children. Moscow: Pediatrs 2016.
Alexeeva EI. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: clinical picture, diagnosis, treatment. Curr Pediatr. 2015;14:78–94. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v14i1.1266
Mistry RR, Patro P, Agarwal V, et al. Enthesitis-related arthritis: current perspectives. Open Access Rheumatol Res Rev. 2019;Volume 11:19–31. doi: 10.2147/OARRR.S163677
Chen B, Li J, He C, et al. Role of HLA-B27 in the pathogenesis of ankylosing spondylitis. Mol Med Rep. 2017;15:1943–51. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6248
Paramarta JE, Van Der Leij C, Gofita I, et al. Peripheral joint inflammation in early onset spondyloarthritis is not specifically related to enthesitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:735–40. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203155
Scola MP, Thompson SD, Brunner HI, et al. Interferon-gamma:interleukin 4 ratios and associated type 1 cytokine expression in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis synovial tissue. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:369–78.
Baerlecken NT, Nothdorft S, Stummvoll GH, et al. Autoantibodies against CD74 in spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1211–4. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202208
Shukla A, Gaur P, Aggarwal A. Effect of probiotics on clinical and immune parameters in enthesitis-related arthritis category of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;185:301–8. doi: 10.1111/cei.12818
Palman J, Shoop-Worrall S, Hyrich K, et al. Update on the epidemiology, risk factors and disease outcomes of Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2018;32:206–22. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2018.10.004
Cattalini M, Soliani M, Caparello MC, et al. Sex Differences in Pediatric Rheumatology. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56:293–307. doi: 10.1007/s12016-017-8642-3
Thierry S, Fautrel B, Lemelle I, et al. Prevalence and incidence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81:112–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.09.003
Burgos-Vargas R, Tse SML. Juvenile-Onset Spondyloarthritis. Handbook of Systemic Autoimmune Diseases. Elsevier 2016:31–52.
Clarke SLN, Sen ES, Ramanan AV. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016;14:27. doi: 10.1186/s12969-016-0088-2
Vitale AT, Graham E, de Boer JH. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis: clinical features and complications, risk factors for severe course, and visual outcome. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2013;21:478–85. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2013.815785
Katargina LA, Brzheskiy VV, Guseva MR, et al. The federal clinical guidelines on “The diagnostics and treatment of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.” Russ Pediatr Ophthalmol. 2016;11:102–11. doi: 10.18821/1993-1859-2016-11-2-102-111
Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, et al. International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:390–2.
Flatø B, Hoffmann‐Vold A, Reiff A, et al. Long‐term outcome and prognostic factors in enthesitis‐related arthritis: A case–control study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:3573–82. doi: 10.1002/art.22181
Weiss PF, Beukelman T, Schanberg LE, et al. Enthesitis-related Arthritis Is Associated with Higher Pain Intensity and Poorer Health Status in Comparison with Other Categories of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: The Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry. J Rheumatol. 2012;39:2341–51. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.120642
Oen K, Duffy CM, Tse SML, et al. Early outcomes and improvement of patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis enrolled in a Canadian multicenter inception cohort. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:527–36. doi: 10.1002/acr.20044
Rostom S, Amine B, Bensabbah R, et al. Hip involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:791–4. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-0853-9
Sherry DD, Sapp LR. Enthesalgia in childhood: site-specific tenderness in healthy subjects and in patients with seronegative enthesopathic arthropathy. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:1335–40.
Weiss P. Diagnosis and treatment of enthesitis-related arthritis. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2012;67. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S25872
Minden K, Niewerth M, Listing J, et al. Long‐term outcome in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:2392–401. doi: 10.1002/art.10444
Chen H-A, Chen C-H, Liao H-T, et al. Clinical, Functional, and Radiographic Differences Among Juvenile-onset, Adult-onset, and Late-onset Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2012;39:1013–8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.111031
Weiss PF, Xiao R, Biko DM, et al. Assessment of Sacroiliitis at Diagnosis of Juvenile Spondyloarthritis by Radiography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Clinical Examination. Arthritis Care Res. 2016;68:187–94. doi: 10.1002/acr.22665
Stoll ML, Bhore R, Dempsey-Robertson M, et al. Spondyloarthritis in a Pediatric Population: Risk Factors for Sacroiliitis. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:2402–8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100014
Maghraoui AE, Bensabbah R, Bahiri R, et al. Cervical spine involvement in ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2003;22:94–8. doi: 10.1007/s10067-002-0681-2
Haasnoot AJW, van Tent-Hoeve M, Wulffraat NM, et al. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate as baseline predictor for the development of uveitis in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:372-377.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.11.007
Heiligenhaus A, Minden K, Föll D, et al. Uveitis in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int. 2015;112:92–100, i. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0092
Baranov AA, Alekseeva EI, Bzarova TM, et al. Protocol for the management of patients with juvenile arthritis. Current Pediatrics. 2013;12:37–56.
Textbook of Pediatric Rheumatology. Elsevier 2016.
Koca B, Sahin S, Adrovic A, et al. Cardiac involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37:137–42. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3534-z
Huppertz H-I, Voigt I, Müller-Scholden J, et al. Cardiac Manifestations in Patients with HLA B27-Associated Juvenile Arthritis. Pediatr Cardiol. 2000;21:141–7. doi: 10.1007/s002469910023
Alam MM, Ray B, Sarkar S, et al. Spirometric evaluation in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: data from eastern India. Indian J Pediatr. 2014;81:1010–4. doi: 10.1007/s12098-013-1335-x
Kim KH, Kim DS. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Diagnosis and differential diagnosis. Korean J Pediatr. 2010;53:931–5. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2010.53.11.931
Jeamsripong S, Charuvanij S. Features distinguishing juvenile idiopathic arthritis among children with musculoskeletal complaints. World J Pediatr WJP. 2020;16:74–81. doi: 10.1007/s12519-018-0212-0
Hu-Torres S, Foster CS. Disease of the year: juvenile idiopathic arthritis--differential diagnosis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2014;22:42–55. doi: 10.3109/09273948.2013.835430
Al-Mayouf SM. Noninflammatory disorders mimic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2018;5:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpam.2018.01.004
Brix N, Rosthøj S, Glerup M, et al. Identifying acute lymphoblastic leukemia mimicking juvenile idiopathic arthritis in children. PloS One. 2020;15:e0237530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237530
Okamoto N, Yokota S, Takei S, et al. Clinical practice guidance for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) 2018. Mod Rheumatol. 2019;29:41–59. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1514724
Nordal EB, Zak M, Aalto K, et al. Validity and predictive ability of the juvenile arthritis disease activity score based on CRP versus ESR in a Nordic population-based setting. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1122–7. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-200237
Breda, L., Nozzi, M., De Sanctis, S., & Chiarelli, F. (2010). Laboratory Tests in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases: An Update. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 40(1), 53–72. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.12.
Onel KB, Horton DB, Lovell DJ, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Recommendations for Nonpharmacologic Therapies, Medication Monitoring, Immunizations, and Imaging. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74:570–85. doi: 10.1002/art.42036
Tepaev RF. Disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome in children. Diagnosis and treatment. Pediatric Pharmacology. 2010;7:27–31.
Rajagopal R, Thachil J, Monagle P. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in paediatrics. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:187–93. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311053
De Vere-Tyndall A, Macauley D, Ansell BM. Disseminated intravascular coagulation complicating systemic juvenile chronic arthritis (“Still’s disease”). Clin Rheumatol. 1983;2:415–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02041564
Gallistl S, Mangge H, Neuwirth G, et al. Activation of the haemostatic system in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis correlates with disease activity. Thromb Res. 1998;92:267–72. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(98)00145-5
Ameri A, Anderson CM, Smith JH, et al. Thromboembolic Complications in a Pediatric Patient Population: Treatment with Direct Oral Anticoagulants. Monitoring of Treatment Efficiency with D-Dimer Levels and Safety Profile By Thromboelastogram. Blood. 2021;138:4270–4270. doi: 10.1182/blood-2021-146948
Oren H, Cingöz I, Duman M, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in pediatric patients: clinical and laboratory features and prognostic factors influencing the survival. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005;22:679–88. doi: 10.1080/08880010500278749
Scott C., Slamang W. Biologics in childhood rheumatic disorders //Current Allergy & Clinical Immunology. – 2018. – Т. 31. – №. 4. – С. 206-211.
Schapkaitz E, Sherman GG, Jacobson BF, et al. Paediatric anticoagulation guidelines. S Afr Med J. 2012;102:171. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.5471
Manco-Johnson MJ. How I treat venous thrombosis in children. Blood. 2006;107:21–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-11-4211
Tolbert J, Carpenter SL. Common Acquired Causes of Thrombosis in Children. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013;43:169–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.05.005
Sepúlveda M P, Salgado U A, Barriga G J, et al. Usefulness of the thromboelastogram in children: correlation with habitual coagulation tests. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2019;90:617–23. doi: 10.32641/rchped.v90i6.930
Hemorrhagic and thrombotic diseases and syndromes in children and adolescents: pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, therapy and prophylaxis: monograph / B.I. Kuznik, V.G. Sturov, N.Yu. Levshin [et al.]. – 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. – Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2018. – 524 p.
Verma A, Hemlata. Thromboelastography as a novel viscoelastic method for hemostasis monitoring: Its methodology, applications, and constraints. Glob J Transfus Med. 2017;2:8. doi: 10.4103/GJTM.GJTM_4_17
Yuan W-H, Liu H-C, Zeng L-K, et al. [Change of Thrombelastography in Children’s DIC and Analysis of Its Sensitivity and Specificity for Diagnosis of DIC]. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2017;25:847–52. doi:10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2017.03.039.
Mikhelson, V. A., V. A. Sidorov, and S. M. Stepanenko. “Anesthesia and Intensive Care in Pediatrics.” M.: «Del rus» (2007).
Golub I. E., Sorokina L. V. Selected issues in general anesthesiology (guidelines for clinical residents, reprint rights authorized). – 2005.
Nik A, Mirfeizi Z, Rezaieyazdi Z, et al. ABO and Rh blood groups in patients with Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Casp J Intern Med. 2021;12. doi: 10.22088/cjim.12.4.568
Salem GI, Gamal NM, Talaat EA, et al. Clinical Impact of the ABO Blood Type in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Is there a Link to the ABO and Rhesus? Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2021;32:237. doi: 10.31138/mjr.32.3.237
Sarkar S, Alam MM, Das G, et al. Inflammatory Markers and Disease Activity in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Indian J Pediatr. 2017;84:349–56. doi: 10.1007/s12098-017-2292-6
Horneff G, Klein A, Ganser G, et al. Protocols on classification, monitoring and therapy in children’s rheumatology (PRO-KIND): results of the working group Polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017;15:78. doi: 10.1186/s12969-017-0206-9
John RM, Kenney-Riley K. Care of the Child with a Possible Rheumatological Disorder. In: John RM, ed. Pediatric Diagnostic Labs for Primary Care: An Evidence-based Approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2022:461–86.
Cortis E, Insalaco A. Macrophage activation syndrome in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:38–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02414.x
Gilliam BE, Chauhan AK, Low JM, et al. Measurement of biomarkers in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients and their significant association with disease severity: a comparative study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;26:492–7.
Marzan KAB, Shaham B. Early Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2012;38:355–72. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2012.04.006
Mahmud SA, Binstadt BA. Autoantibodies in the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Prognosis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Front Immunol. 2018;9:3168. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.03168
Syed RH, Gilliam BE, Moore TL. Rheumatoid factors and anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies in pediatric rheumatology. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2008;10:156–63. doi: 10.1007/s11926-008-0027-4
Barash J, Goldzweig O. Possible role of streptococcal infection in flares of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:877–80. doi: 10.1002/art.22787
Nishibukuro M, Tsutsumi N, Chiyotanda M, et al. Poststreptococcal reactive arthritis in Japan. J Infect Chemother Off J Jpn Soc Chemother. 2018;24:531–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.02.012
Srivastava R, Phatak S, Yadav A, et al. HLA B27 typing in 511 children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis from India. Rheumatol Int. 2016;36:1407–11. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3529-9
Żuber Z, Turowska-Heydel D, Sobczyk M, et al. Prevalence of HLA-B27 antigen in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Reumatologia. 2015;53:125–30. doi: 10.5114/reum.2015.53133
Ahn JG. Role of Biomarkers in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Rheum Dis. 2020;27:233–40. doi: 10.4078/jrd.2020.27.4.233
Ben-Chetrit E, Gattorno M, Gul A, et al. Consensus proposal for taxonomy and definition of the autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs): a Delphi study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1558–65. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212515
Adrovic A, Sahin S, Barut K, et al. Familial Mediterranean fever and periodic fever, aphthous stomatitis, pharyngitis, and adenitis (PFAPA) syndrome: shared features and main differences. Rheumatol Int. 2019;39:29–36. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4105-2
Bourguiba R, Savey L, Aouba A, et al. Le syndrome de fièvre prolongée associée aux mutations du gène du récepteur au TNF de type 1 : un diagnostic différentiel de la fièvre méditerranéenne familiale à ne pas méconnaître chez les patients d’origine méditerranéenne. Rev Médecine Interne. 2021;42:459–64. doi: 10.1016/j.revmed.2020.08.007
Sag E, Bilginer Y, Ozen S. Autoinflammatory Diseases with Periodic Fevers. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017;19:41. doi: 10.1007/s11926-017-0670-8
Soon GS, Laxer RM. Approach to recurrent fever in childhood. Can Fam Physician Med Fam Can. 2017;63:756–62.
Hashkes PJ, Laxer RM, Simon A, editors. Textbook of Autoinflammation. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2019.
Shcherbina AYu. Primary immunodeficiencies: realities of the 21st century. Issues of Hematology, Oncology and Immunopathology in Pediatrics. 2016;15:8-9–9. https://www.hemoncim.com/jour/article/view/142 (accessed 14 April 2020)
Zahran AM, Abdallah AM, Saad K, et al. Peripheral Blood B and T Cell Profiles in Children with Active Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2019;67:427–32. doi: 10.1007/s00005-019-00560-7
Quesada-Masachs E, Άlvarez De La Sierra D, Garcia Prat M, et al. AB0165 In Depth Immunophenotypic Analysis In Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA): A Crossectional Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:952.3-953. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.4823
Ringold S, Weiss PF, Beukelman T, et al. 2013 update of the 2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: recommendations for the medical therapy of children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and tuberculosis screening among children receiving biologic medications. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65:1551–63. doi: 10.1002/acr.22087
Barut K, Şahin S, Adrovic A, et al. Tuberculin skin test response in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis on anti-TNF therapy. Turk J Med Sci. 2018;48:1109–14. doi: 10.3906/sag-1710-190
García-Basteiro AL, DiNardo A, Saavedra B, et al. Point of care diagnostics for tuberculosis. Pulmonology. 2018;24:73–85. doi: 10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.12.002
Brunelli JB, Bonfiglioli KR, Silva CA, et al. Latent tuberculosis infection screening in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients preceding anti-TNF therapy in a tuberculosis high-risk country. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2017;57:392–6. doi: 10.1016/j.rbre.2016.11.004
Cantini F, Nannini C, Niccoli L, et al. Guidance for the management of patients with latent tuberculosis infection requiring biologic therapy in rheumatology and dermatology clinical practice. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14:503–9. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.01.011
Aksenova VA, Baryshnikov LA, Klevno NI, et al. [New opportunities for screening and diagnosis of various manifestations of tuberculosis infection in children and adolescents in Russia]. Voprosy Sovremennoi Pediatrii. 2011;10:16–22. (In Russ.)
Aksenova VA, Klevno NI, Kazakov AV, et al. Preventive Tuberculosis Services Reduces the Risk of Local Forms of Tuberculosis Development in Children on Immunosuppressive Therapy: Retrospective Cohort Study. Curr Pediatr. 2020;19:346–51. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v19i5.2210
Calzada-Hernández J, Anton J, Martín De Carpi J, et al. Dual latent tuberculosis screening with tuberculin skin tests and QuantiFERON-TB assays before TNF-α inhibitor initiation in children in Spain. Eur J Pediatr. 2022;182:307–17. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04640-3
Barmina NA, Baryshnikova LA, Shurygin AA, et al. Screening examination of children and adolescents of health groups III, IV and V using a new diagnostic test. Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases. 2015;0:40–1.
Selmi C, Gershwin ME. Diagnosis and classification of reactive arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13:546–9. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.01.005
Bentaleb I, Abdelghani KB, Rostom S, et al. Reactive Arthritis: Update. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. 2020;1–9. doi: 10.1007/s40588-020-00152-6
Zeidler H, Hudson AP. Reactive Arthritis Update: Spotlight on New and Rare Infectious Agents Implicated as Pathogens. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021;23:53. doi: 10.1007/s11926-021-01018-6
Dembek ZF, Mothershead JL, Owens AN, et al. Psittacosis: An Underappreciated and Often Undiagnosed Disease. Pathogens. 2023;12:1165. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12091165
Singh A, Karrar S. The Role of Intracellular Organisms in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Arthritis. Int J Inflamm. 2014;2014:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2014/158793
Taccetti G, Trapani S, Ermini M, et al. Reactive arthritis triggered by Yersinia enterocolitica: a review of 18 pediatric cases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1994;12:681–4.
Williams G. F. et al. Post-Yersinia Arthritis // Western Journal of Medicine. – 1980. – Vol. 132. – No. 6. – P. 535.
Yang W-C, Huang Y-C, Tsai M-H, et al. Salmonella Septic Arthritis Involving Multiple Joints in a Girl with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia at Diagnosis. Pediatr Neonatol. 2009;50:33–5. doi: 10.1016/S1875-9572(09)60027-9
Kanakoudi-Tsakalidou, G Pardalos, P F. Persistent or Severe Course of Reactive Arthritis Following Salmonella enteritidis Infection: A prospective study of 9 cases. Scand J Rheumatol. 1998;27:431–4. doi: 10.1080/030097498442253
Kurniawan A, Sitorus IP, Loho T, et al. A rare case of septic arthritis of the knee caused by Salmonella typhi with preexisting typhoid fever in a healthy, immunocompetent child – A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021;78:76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.12.003
Leino R, Mäkelä A-L, Tiilikainen A, et al. Yersinia Arthritis in Children. Scand J Rheumatol. 1980;9:245–9. doi: 10.3109/03009748009112357
Hannu T. Reactive arthritis after an outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis serotype O:3 infection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:866–9. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.9.866
Jezequel C, Prigent JY, Loiseau-Corvez MN, et al. [Reactive arthritis caused by Yersinia in children. Report of 4 cases]. Ann Pediatr (Paris). 1991;38:318–22.
Naija O. et al. A new case of reactive arthritis following Yersinia pseudotuberculosis serotype IV // Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. – 2010. – Vol. 5. – No. 02. – P. 193-194.
Orczyk K, Świdrowska-Jaros J, Smolewska E. When a patient suspected with juvenile idiopathic arthritis turns out to be diagnosed with an infectious disease - a review of Lyme arthritis in children. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2017;15:35. doi: 10.1186/s12969-017-0166-0
Sood SK. Lyme Disease in Children. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:281–94. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2015.02.011
Steffen, Hirsch. Diagnostik der Lyme-Borreliose. Ther Umsch. 2005;62:737–44. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930.62.11.737
Giancane G, Swart JF, Castagnola E, et al. Opportunistic infections in immunosuppressed patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: analysis by the Pharmachild Safety Adjudication Committee. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22:71. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02167-2
Houen G, Trier NH. Epstein-Barr Virus and Systemic Autoimmune Diseases. Front Immunol. 2020;11:587380. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.587380
Shi T, Huang L, Tian J. Prevalence of Epstein-Barr Viral DNA among children at a single hospital in Suzhou, China. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022;98:142–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.05.006
Kharitonova LA, Soboleva NG. The role of the infectious factor in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in children. Ross Vestn Perinatol Pediatr Russ Bull Perinatol Pediatr. 2018;63:59–63. doi: 10.21508/1027-4065-2018-63-3-59-63
Engelmann I, Petzold DR, Kosinska A, et al. Rapid quantitative PCR assays for the simultaneous detection of herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and human herpesvirus 6 DNA in blood and other clinical specimens. J Med Virol. 2008;80:467–77. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21095
Soldatova E. Yu. et al. Prevalence of herpesvirus infection in patients with various forms and variants of juvenile arthritis // Lechaschy Vrach. – 2017. – No. 6. – P. 31-31.
Banko A, Cirkovic A, Jeremic I, et al. Uncovering the Role of Epstein–Barr Virus Infection Markers for Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Biomedicines. 2023;11:2375. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11092375
for the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO), Giancane G, Swart JF, et al. Opportunistic infections in immunosuppressed patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: analysis by the Pharmachild Safety Adjudication Committee. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22:71. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02167-2
Liu Z, Zhang P, Tang S, et al. Urine real-time polymerase chain reaction detection for children virus pneumonia with acute human cytomegalovirus infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:245. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-245
A. Ross S, Novak Z, Pati S, et al. Overview of the Diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus Infection. Infect Disord - Drug Targets. 2011;11:466–74. doi: 10.2174/187152611797636703
Slots J, Slots H. Bacterial and viral pathogens in saliva: disease relationship and infectious risk. Periodontol 2000. 2011;55:48–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00361.x
Strick LB, Wald A. Diagnostics for Herpes Simplex Virus: Is PCR the New Gold Standard? Mol Diagn Ther. 2006;10:17–28. doi: 10.1007/BF03256439
Vince A, Dusek D. Imunosupresija i virusne infekcije u reumatskim bolestima [Immunosupression and viral infections in rheumatic diseases]. Reumatizam. 2007;54(2):58-62. Croatian. PMID: 18351141.
Eisenstein EM, Wolf DG. Cytomegalovirus infection in pediatric rheumatic diseases: a review. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2010;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-8-17
Hanson V, Kornreich HK, Drexler E, et al. Some Immunologic Considerations in Focal Scleroderma and Progressive Systemic Sclerosis in Children. Pediatr Res. 1974;8:806–9. doi: 10.1203/00006450-197409000-00006
Looker KJ, Magaret AS, May MT, et al. Global and Regional Estimates of Prevalent and Incident Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infections in 2012. PloS One. 2015;10:e0140765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140765
McQuillan G, Kruszon-Moran D, Flagg EW, et al. Prevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Type 2 in Persons Aged 14-49: United States, 2015-2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2018;1–8.
Xu F, Lee FK, Morrow RA, et al. Seroprevalence of herpes simplex virus type 1 in children in the United States. J Pediatr. 2007;151:374–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.065
Levin MJ, Weinberg A, Schmid DS. Herpes Simplex Virus and Varicella-Zoster Virus. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.DMIH2-0017-2015
McAuley JB. Congenital Toxoplasmosis. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2014;3 Suppl 1:S30-35. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piu077
McAuley JB. Toxoplasmosis in Children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:161–2. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181658abb
Villard O, Cimon B, L’Ollivier C, et al. Serological diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;84:22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.09.009
Dong W, Zhong Q, Gu Y-L, et al. Is Toxoplasma gondii infection a concern in individuals with rheumatic diseases? Evidence from a case-control study based on serological diagnosis. Microb Pathog. 2023;182:106257. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106257
Salem DA, Al-Ghamdi AH, Alghamdi JM, et al. Toxoplasma and Toxocara seropositivity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis and its relation to disease activity and type of therapies. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2023;31:e00195. doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2023.e00195
Abdolsalehi M, Pourakbari B, Mahmoudi S, et al. Clinical and Epidemiologic Features of Visceral Leishmaniasis in Children: A 6-year Study from an Iranian Referral Hospital. Infect Disord Drug Targets. 2020;20:461–6. doi: 10.2174/1871526519666190613123217
Aronson NE, Joya CA. Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Updates in Diagnosis and Management. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2019;33:101–17. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2018.10.004
Cascio A., Colomba C. Childhood Mediterranean visceral leishmaniasis // Le Infezioni in Medicina. – 2003. – Vol. 11. – No. 1. – P. 5-10.
Moltó A, Mateo L, Lloveras N, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis and macrophagic activation syndrome in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis under treatment with adalimumab. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77:271–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.01.011
Kurizky PS, Marianelli FF, Cesetti MV, et al. A comprehensive systematic review of leishmaniasis in patients undergoing drug-induced immunosuppression for the treatment of dermatological, rheumatological and gastroenterological diseases. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2020;62:e28. doi: 10.1590/s1678-9946202062028
Indolfi G, Easterbrook P, Dusheiko G, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection in children and adolescents. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4:466–76. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30042-1
European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu, European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;67:370–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021
Indolfi G, Easterbrook P, Dusheiko G, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection in children and adolescents. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4:477–87. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30046-9
Mack CL, Adams D, Assis DN, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Autoimmune Hepatitis in Adults and Children: 2019 Practice Guidance and Guidelines From the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatol Baltim Md. 2020;72:671–722. doi: 10.1002/hep.31065
Lampertico P, Agarwal K, Berg T, et al. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;67:370–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021
Harrison MJ, Brice N, Scott C. Clinical Features of HIV Arthropathy in Children: A Case Series and Literature Review. Front Immunol. 2021;12:677984. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.677984
World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on the diagnosis of HIV infection in infants and children. World Health Organization, 2010.
Reust CE. Evaluation of primary immunodeficiency disease in children. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87:773–8.
Key recommendations. WHO Recommendations on the Diagnosis of HIV Infection in Infants and Children. World Health Organization 2010.
Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:10–67. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05878-6
Howell MD, Davis AM. Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock. JAMA. 2017;317:847. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.0131
Trachtman R, Murray E, Wang CM, et al. Procalcitonin Differs in Children With Infection and Children With Disease Flares in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol Pract Rep Rheum Musculoskelet Dis. 2021;27:87–91. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001170
Limper M, de Kruif MD, Duits AJ, et al. The diagnostic role of Procalcitonin and other biomarkers in discriminating infectious from non-infectious fever. J Infect. 2010;60:409–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2010.03.016
Chien Y-L, Huang F-L, Huang C-M, et al. Clinical approach to fever of unknown origin in children. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017;50:893–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.007
Ahmadinejad Z, Mansori S, Ziaee V, et al. Periodic Fever: a review on clinical, management and guideline for Iranian patients - part I. Iran J Pediatr 2014;24:1–13.
Ören H, Cingöz I, Duman M, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in pediatric patients: Clinical and Laboratory Features and Prognostic Factors Influencing the Survival. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005;22:679–88. doi: 10.1080/08880010500278749
Robinson JL, Lee BE, Kothapalli S, et al. Use of Throat Swab or Saliva Specimens for Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Children. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:e61–4. doi: 10.1086/529386
Hurd A, Beukelman T. Infectious Complications in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2013;15:327. doi: 10.1007/s11926-013-0327-1
Del Giudice E, Marcellino A, Hoxha S, et al. Proteinuria and hematuria as early signs of renal involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1395961. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1395961
Ruemmele FM, Veres G, Kolho KL, et al. Consensus guidelines of ECCO/ESPGHAN on the medical management of pediatric Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. Published Online First: 5 June 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.04.005
Turner D, Ruemmele FM, Orlanski-Meyer E, et al. Management of Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis, Part 1: Ambulatory Care—An Evidence-based Guideline From European Crohnʼs and Colitis Organization and European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;67:257–91. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002035
Ferrara G, Pastore S, Sancin L, et al. Fecal Calprotectin to Detect Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2018;45:1418–21. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171200
Boylan M. Should ultrasound be used routinely in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis? Ir J Med Sci. 2020;189:735–48. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02096-3
Basra HAS, Humphries PD. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: what is the utility of ultrasound? Br J Radiol. 2017;90:20160920. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160920
Chauvin NA, Doria AS. Ultrasound imaging of synovial inflammation in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47:1160–70. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3934-6
Malattia C, Rinaldi M, Martini A. The role of imaging in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018;14:681–94. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2018.1496019
Balassy C, Miller SF. CT in children’s bones and joints: When, how and common findings. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:1126–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.007
Allen-Rhoades W, Whittle SB, Rainusso N. Pediatric Solid Tumors in Children and Adolescents: An Overview. Pediatr Rev. 2018;39:444–53. doi: 10.1542/pir.2017-0268
Zucker EJ, Lee EY, Restrepo R, et al. Hip disorders in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:W776-796. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.10623
Munir S, Patil K, Miller E, et al. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis of the axial joints: a systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy and predictive value of conventional MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:199–210. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10475
Yilmaz MH, Ozbayrak M, Kasapcopur O, et al. Pelvic MRI findings of juvenile-onset ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29:1007–13. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1514-3
Vendhan K, Sen D, Fisher C, et al. Inflammatory Changes of the Lumbar Spine in Children and Adolescents With Enthesitis‐Related Arthritis: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66:40–6. doi: 10.1002/acr.22201
Schiettecatte E, Jans L, Jaremko JL, et al. MR Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Affecting the Pediatric Population. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2021;25:082–93. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726435
Sheybani EF, Khanna G, White AJ, et al. Imaging of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Multimodality Approach. RadioGraphics. 2013;33:1253–73. doi: 10.1148/rg.335125178
León-Domínguez A, Cansino-Román R, Martínez-Salas JM, et al. Clinical examination and imaging resources in children and adolescent back pain. J Child Orthop. 2023;17:512–26. doi: 10.1177/18632521231215860
Goirand M, Breton S, Chevallier F, et al. Clinical features of children with enthesitis-related juvenile idiopathic arthritis / juvenile spondyloarthritis followed in a French tertiary care pediatric rheumatology centre. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2018;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s12969-018-0238-9
Azouz EM, Duffy CM. Juvenile spondyloarthropathies: clinical manifestations and medical imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24:399–408. doi: 10.1007/BF00941234
Weiss PF, Colbert RA. Radiography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis: Is the MR Image Everything? J Rheumatol. 2014;41:832–3. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140212
Stefanski A-L, Tomiak C, Pleyer U, et al. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Sjögren’s Syndrome. Dtsch Arzteblatt Int. 2017;114:354–61. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0354
D’Arco F, Ugga L. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric salivary gland diseases: a guide to the differential diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol. 2020;50:1293–307. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04684-3
Takagi Y, Sasaki M, Eida S, et al. Comparison of salivary gland MRI and ultrasonography findings among patients with Sjögren’s syndrome over a wide age range. Rheumatology. 2022;61:1986–96. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab560
Krumrey-Langkammerer M, Haas J-P. Salivary gland ultrasound in the diagnostic workup of juvenile Sjögren’s syndrome and mixed connective tissue disease. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2020;18:44. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-00437-6
Dumaine C, Bekkar S, Belot A, et al. Infectious adverse events in children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis treated with Biological Agents in a real-life setting: Data from the JIRcohorte. Joint Bone Spine. 2020;87:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2019.07.011
Sierra D, Wood M, Kolli S, et al. Pediatric Gastritis, Gastropathy, and Peptic Ulcer Disease. Pediatr Rev. 2018;39:542–9. doi: 10.1542/pir.2017-0234
Jones NL, Koletzko S, Goodman K, et al. Joint ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN Guidelines for the Management of Helicobacter pylori in Children and Adolescents (Update 2016). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64:991–1003. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001594
Bzarova T.M., Shcherbakov P.L., Alekseeva E.I., Chistyakova E.G., and Valieva S.I. “Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children with juvenile arthritis” Issues of Modern Pediatrics, vol. 6, no. 4, 2007, pp. 17-22.
Kotilea K, Cadranel S, Salame A, et al. Efficacy and safety of bismuth‐based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in children. Helicobacter. 2021;26:e12825. doi: 10.1111/hel.12825
Belmer S.V., Kornienko E.A., Volynets G.V., Gurova M.M., Zvyagin A.A., Kamalova A.A., Luppova N.E., Nizhevich A.A., Novikova V.P., Pechkurov D.V., Privorotsky V.F., Sataev V.U., Tyazheva A.A., Faizullina R.A., Khavkin A.I. Diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2021;(9):119-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-193-9-119-127.
Pichler J, Ong C, Shah N, et al. Histopathological features of gastrointestinal mucosal biopsies in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Res. 2016;79:895–901. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.27
Ashorn M, Verronen P, Ruuska T, et al. Upper endoscopic findings in children with active juvenile chronic arthritis. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92:558–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb02506.x
Len C, Hilario MO, Kawakami E, et al. Gastroduodenal lesions in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:991–6.
Weber P, Brune T, Ganser G, et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms and permeability in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003;21:657–62.
Listopadova A. P. et al. Etiological structure of chronic gastritis in children with juvenile chronic arthritis // Actual Problems of Medicine. – 2014. – Vol. 28. – No. 24 (195). – P. 33-36.
Maller J, Fox E, Park KT, et al. Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2021;48:567–74. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200230
Broekaert IJ, Klein A, Windschall D, et al. Development of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treated With Biologics. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2023;76:174–82. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003656
Passo MH, Fitzgerald JF, Brandt KD. Arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease in children: Relationship of joint disease to activity and severity of bowel lesion. Dig Dis Sci. 1986;31:492–7. doi: 10.1007/BF01320313
Biswas S. et al. IBD-Associated Arthritis Misdiagnosed as Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Case Report and Literature Review: 2091 // Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG. – 2018. – Vol. 113. – P. S1188-S1189.
Martín Pedraz L, Galindo Zavala R, Blasco Alonso J, et al. Crohn’s disease in a patient with systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Association or associated side effect of treatment? Reumatol Clínica Engl Ed. 2022;18:557–9. doi: 10.1016/j.reumae.2021.06.004
De Cock D, Hyrich K. Malignancy and rheumatoid arthritis: Epidemiology, risk factors and management. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2018;32:869–86. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.03.011
Lobo L, Antunes D. Chest CT in infants and children. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:1108–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.006
Quezada A, Ramos S, Garcia M, et al. Lung involvement in rheumatologic diseases in children. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2012;40:88–91. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2011.02.009
Nikishina I, Kolkhidova Z, Blank L, et al. AB1260 Significance of whole-body mri in children with rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:1739.3-1740. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.4671
Eutsler EP, Khanna G. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in children: technique and clinical applications. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46:858–72. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3586-y
Fonseca MB, Gomes FHR, Valera ET, et al. Signs and symptoms of rheumatic diseases as first manifestation of pediatric cancer: diagnosis and prognosis implications. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed. 2017;57:330–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbre.2017.01.007
Alias A, Rodriguez EJ, Bateman HE, et al. Rheumatology and oncology: an updated review of rheumatic manifestations of malignancy and anti-neoplastictherapy. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012;70:109–14.
Grebenyuk V. et al. Fever of unknown origin: case reports from routine clinical practice and a review // Klinicka Mikrobiologie a Infekcni Lekarstvi. – 2021. – Vol. 27. – No. 4. – P. 148-157.
Zakharova I.N., Osmanov I.M., Tvorogova T.M., Goryaynova A.N., Dmitrieva Yu.A., Vorobyova A.S., Koroid N.V. Prolonged fever in a child: what is the cause, how to examine, treat or not treat? Meditsinskiy Sovet = Medical Council. 2020;(10):151–162. doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2020-10-151-162. (In Russ.)
Trapani S, Grisolia F, Simonini G, et al. Incidence of occult cancer in children presenting with musculoskeletal symptoms: a 10-year survey in a pediatric rheumatology unit. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2000;29:348–59. doi: 10.1053/sarh.2000.5752
Li Q. et al. Quantifying the contribution of 18F-FDG PET to the diagnostic assessment of pediatric patients with fever of unknown origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Pediatric Radiology. – 2022. – P. 1-12.
Ćwikła JB. New imaging techniques in reumathology: MRI, scintigraphy and PET. Pol J Radiol. 2013;78:48–56. doi: 10.12659/PJR.889138
Colamussi P, Prandini N, Cittanti C, et al. Scintigraphy in rheumatic diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2004;18:909–26. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2004.07.003
Handa R, Upadhyaya S, Kapoor S, et al. Tuberculosis and biologics in rheumatology: A special situation. Int J Rheum Dis. 2017;20:1313–25. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13129
Clemente D, Cuadros EN, Lovillo MC, et al. Position statement on infection screening, prophylaxis, and vaccination of pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases and immunosuppressive therapies, part 3: precautions in situations of surgery, fever, and opportunistic infections. Eur J Pediatr. 2023;183:915–27. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05295-4
Bovid KM, Moore MD. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis for the Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon. Orthop Clin North Am. 2019;50:471–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2019.06.003
Radwan-Oczko M, Duś-Ilnicka I, Richards P, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis patients’ oral health and disease activity. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019;22:1538–43. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13590
Lvovich S, Goldsmith DP. Neurological Complications of Rheumatic Disease. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2017;24:54–9. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2016.12.007
Shiari R. Neurologic manifestations of childhood rheumatic diseases. Iran J Child Neurol. 2012;6:1–7.
Röher K, Trieschmann U, Leister N. Anästhesie und Analgosedierung für diagnostische Eingriffe bei Kindern. AINS - Anästhesiol · Intensivmed · Notfallmedizin · Schmerzther. 2023;58:409–20. doi: 10.1055/a-1925-7009
Dumas G, Arabi YM, Bartz R, et al. Diagnosis and management of autoimmune diseases in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2024;50:17–35. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07266-7
Janssen NM, Karnad DR, Guntupalli KK. Rheumatologic diseases in the intensive care unit: epidemiology, clinical approach, management, and outcome. Crit Care Clin. 2002;18:729–48. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0704(02)00025-8
Hynes L, Saetes S, McGuire B, et al. Child and Family Adaptation to Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis—A Systematic Review of the Role of Resilience Resources and Mechanisms. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2445. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02445
Frye WS, Milojevic D. The Role of Psychology in Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2022;69:965–74. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2022.05.009
Chyzheuskaya I. et al. THU0508 Psychological features of children with rheumatic diseases. – 2017.
LeBovidge JS. Psychological Adjustment of Children and Adolescents WithChronic Arthritis: A Meta-analytic Review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28:29–39. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/28.1.29
Ferro MA, Boyle MH. Self-concept among youth with a chronic illness: A meta-analytic review. Health Psychol. 2013;32:839–48. doi: 10.1037/a0031861
Cousino MK, Hazen RA. Parenting Stress Among Caregivers of Children With Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013;38:809–28. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst049
Knafl K, Leeman J, Havill NL, et al. The Contribution of Parent and Family Variables to the Well-Being of Youth With Arthritis. J Fam Nurs. 2015;21:579–616. doi: 10.1177/1074840715601475
Kellgren, Jonas H. “The epidemiology of chronic rheumatism.” Atlas of standard radiographs of arthritis 2 (1963): 22-23.
Bennett, Peter H. “Population studies of the rheumatic disease.” Proceedings of the Third International Symposium. Excerpta Medica, 1968.
Dougados M, Linden SVD, Juhlin R, et al. The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group Preliminary Criteria for the Classification of Spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34:1218–27. doi: 10.1002/art.1780341003
Amor, B et al. “Critères de classification des spondylarthropathies” [Criteria of the classification of spondylarthropathies]. Revue du rhumatisme et des maladies osteo-articulaires vol. 57,2 (1990): 85-9.
Häfner, R. “Die juvenile Spondarthritis. Retrospektive Untersuchung an 71 Patienten” [Juvenile spondarthritis. Retrospective study of 71 patients]. Monatsschrift Kinderheilkunde: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde vol. 135,1 (1987): 41-6.
Hussein A, Abdul-Khaliq H, Von Der Hardt H. Atypical spondyloarthritis in children: proposed diagnostic criteria. Eur J Pediatr. 1989;148:513–7. doi: 10.1007/BF00441545
Martini A, Ravelli A, Avcin T, et al. Toward New Classification Criteria for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: First Steps, Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization International Consensus. J Rheumatol. 2019;46:190–7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180168
Henderson LA, Cron RQ. Macrophage Activation Syndrome and Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Childhood Inflammatory Disorders: Diagnosis and Management. Paediatr Drugs. 2020;22:29–44. doi: 10.1007/s40272-019-00367-1
Ravelli A, Davì S, Minoia F, et al. Macrophage Activation Syndrome. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2015;29:927–41. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2015.06.010
Shakoory B, Geerlinks A, Wilejto M, et al. The 2022 EULAR/ACR points to consider at the early stages of diagnosis and management of suspected haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation syndrome (HLH/MAS). Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82:1271–85. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224123
Hines MR, von Bahr Greenwood T, Beutel G, et al. Consensus-Based Guidelines for the Recognition, Diagnosis, and Management of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Critically Ill Children and Adults. Crit Care Med. 2022;50:860–72. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005361
Lehmberg K, Pink I, Eulenburg C, et al. Differentiating Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis from Other Forms of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis. J Pediatr. 2013;162:1245–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.081
Chen T-Y, Hsu M-H, Kuo H-C, et al. Outcome analysis of pediatric hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120:172–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.03.025
Rigante D, Emmi G, Fastiggi M, et al. Macrophage activation syndrome in the course of monogenic autoinflammatory disorders. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34:1333–9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-2923-0
Valade S, Mariotte E, Azoulay E. Coagulation Disorders in Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome. Crit Care Clin. 2020;36:415–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2019.12.004
Valade S, Azoulay E, Galicier L, et al. Coagulation Disorders and Bleedings in Critically Ill Patients With Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1692. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001692
Iakunina LN, Plakhuta TG, Tsymbal IN. [State of hemostasis in hemorrhagic vasculitis in children]. Pediatriia. 1992;16–20.
Law C, Raffini L. A Guide to the Use of Anticoagulant Drugs in Children. Pediatr Drugs. 2015;17:105–14. doi: 10.1007/s40272-015-0120-x
McGrowder, D., Brown, P., Gordon, L., Budall, S., Irving, R., Alexander-Lindo, R., & Mhlanga, M. The Application of Thromboelastography in Clinical Practice.
Xiang, L., Qian, J., Zhang, J., Ren, H., HU, X., LI, B., ... & NING, B. (2017). Clinical study of thromboelastography for assessment of coagulation disorders in children with sepsis. Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1284-1289.
Li Z, Xiao J, Song H, et al. Evaluation of coagulation disorders by thromboelastography in children with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2019;28:181–8. doi: 10.1177/0961203318819137
Avčin T, Tse SML, Schneider R, et al. Macrophage activation syndrome as the presenting manifestation of rheumatic diseases in childhood. J Pediatr. 2006;148:683–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.12.070
Bagri NK, Gupta L, Sen ES, et al. Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Children: Diagnosis and Management. Indian Pediatr. 2021;58:1155–61. doi: 10.1007/s13312-021-2399-8
Abolghasemi H, Shahverdi E, Niknam R, et al. Macrophage Activation Syndrome as the First Presentation of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. IJBC. 2017;9:93–6.
Ansuini V, Rigante D, Esposito S. Debate around infection-dependent hemophagocytic syndrome in paediatrics. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-15
D’Errico MM, Cuoco F, Biancardi C, et al. YIM-P58. Macrophage activation syndrome: the role of infectious triggers. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2014;12:Y5, 1546-0096-12-S1-Y5. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-12-S1-Y5
Eloseily EM, Cron RQ. Macrophage Activation Syndrome. In: Ragab G, Atkinson TP, Stoll ML, eds. The Microbiome in Rheumatic Diseases and Infection. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2018:151–82.
Long S. S., Pickering L. K., Prober C. G. Principles and practice of pediatric infectious diseases. – 2023.
Xu D, Li S, Chen Z, et al. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in different respiratory specimens. Eur J Pediatr. 2011;170:851–8. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1360-y
Copete AR, Vera C, Herrera M, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Children With and Without Community-acquired Pneumonia. What do PCR and Serology Say? Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39:e104–8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002636
Waris ME, Toikka P, Saarinen T, et al. Diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:3155–9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.11.3155-3159.1998
Department of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, India, Kumar S, Kumar S, et al. Mycoplasma Pneumoniae as a Causative Agent of Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Children. Ann Pediatr Child Health. 2023;11:1–4. doi: 10.47739/2373-9312.pediatrics.1325
Blanche S, Caniglia M, Fischer A, et al. Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Hemophagocytic Syndrome: Clinical Presentation and Treatment. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1989;6:233–5. doi: 10.3109/08880018909034292
Nowalk A, Green M. Epstein-Barr Virus. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4:4.3.47. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.DMIH2-0011-2015
Zeng H-S, Xiong X-Y, Wei Y-D, et al. Macrophage activation syndrome in 13 children with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. World J Pediatr. 2008;4:97–101. doi: 10.1007/s12519-008-0018-6
Brisse E, Matthys P, Wouters CH. Understanding the spectrum of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: update on diagnostic challenges and therapeutic options. Br J Haematol. 2016;174:175–87. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14144
Lin C-I, Yu H-H, Lee J-H, et al. Clinical analysis of macrophage activation syndrome in pediatric patients with autoimmune diseases. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31:1223–30. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-1998-0
Lukjanoviča K, Šlēziņa I, Dāvidsone Z, et al. Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Secondary Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Latvia from 2009 to 2020: A Nationwide Retrospective Study. Medicina (Mex). 2023;59:798. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040798
Nadimpalli S, Foca M, Satwani P, et al. Diagnostic yield of bronchoalveolar lavage in immunocompromised children with malignant and non-malignant disorders: BAL in Immunocompromised Children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:820–6. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23644
Ers. Bronchoalveolar lavage in children. Eur Respir J. 2000;15:217–31. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00.15121700
Amanati A, Karimi A, Fahimzad A, et al. Prevalence of Human Herpes Viruses in Bronchoalveolar Lavage of Critically Ill Children Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation at a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2018;6. doi: 10.5812/pedinfect.12685
Wong JCP, Hon KLE, Leung KKY, et al. Diagnostic Yield of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Immunocompromised Children. J Trop Pediatr. 2021;67:fmaa131. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa131
Eroglu-Ertugrul NG, Yalcin E, Oguz B, et al. The value of flexible bronchoscopy in pulmonary infections of immunosuppressed children. Clin Respir J. 2020;14:78–84. doi: 10.1111/crj.13103
Gonski K, Cohn R, Widger J, et al. Utility of bronchoscopy in immunocompromised paediatric patients: Systematic review. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020;34:24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.02.003
Özkoç S, Bayram Delibaş S. [Investigation of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and colonization in iatrogenically immunosuppressed and immunocompetent patients]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2015;49:221–30. doi: 10.5578/mb.9344
Lachant DJ, Croft DP, McGrane Minton H, et al. The clinical impact of pneumocystis and viral PCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage in immunosuppressed patients. Respir Med. 2018;145:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.10.021
Stephan JL. Reactive haemophagocytic syndrome in children with inflammatory disorders. A retrospective study of 24 patients. Rheumatology. 2001;40:1285–92. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/40.11.1285
Varadaraju S, Khandelwal P, Sankar J, et al. Multiple opportunistic infection-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in nephrotic syndrome: A case report. J Pediatr Crit Care. 2021;8:295. doi: 10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_64_21
Weyant RB, Kabbani D, Doucette K, et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii: a review with a focus on prevention and treatment. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021;22:1579–92. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1915989
Morris A, Norris KA. Colonization by Pneumocystis jirovecii and Its Role in Disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:297–317. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00013-12
White PL, Price JS, Backx M. Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia: Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestation and Diagnosis. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2019;13:260–73. doi: 10.1007/s12281-019-00349-3
Schüller M, Macků M, Fráňová J. Pneumocystis pneumonia in a child with sojia. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2014;12:P225, 1546-0096-12-S1-P225. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-12-S1-P225
Saper V. E. et al. Emergent high fatality lung disease in systemic juvenile arthritis // Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. – 2019. – Vol. 78. – No. 12. – P. 1722-1731.
Rayment JH, Narang I. Pulmonary Aspergillosis in a Previously Healthy 13-Year-Old Boy. Can Respir J. 2016;2016:4575942. doi: 10.1155/2016/4575942
de Mol M, de Jongste JC, van Westreenen M, et al. Diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in children with bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan: BAL Galactomannan Aspergillosis Children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013;48:789–96. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22670
Zhao M, Guan Y, Lin J, et al. Acute kidney injury in critical care: complications of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1396124. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1396124
Fitzgerald NE, MacClain KL. Imaging characteristics of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33:392–401. doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-0894-9
Schmidt MH, Sung L, Shuckett BM. Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Children: Abdominal US Findings within 1 Week of Presentation. Radiology. 2004;230:685–9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2303030223
Chinnici A, Beneforti L, Pegoraro F, et al. Approaching hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1210041. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1210041
Malik P, Antonini L, Mannam P, et al. MRI Patterns in Pediatric CNS Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42:2077–85. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7292
Shieh AC, Guler E, Smith DA, et al. Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A Primer for Radiologists. Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214:W11–9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21788
Hur M, Kim YC, Lee KM, et al. Macrophage Activation Syndrome in a Child with Systemic Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Korean Med Sci. 2005;20:695. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.4.695
Behrens EM, Beukelman T, Paessler M, et al. Occult macrophage activation syndrome in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:1133–8.
Shekarchian F, Abadi MKA, Shariati MM. Clinical approach to a child with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and bilateral optic nerve head infiltration: A case report and brief literature review. Clin Case Rep. 2023;11:e7999. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.7999
Wang L, Suo L, Kou F, et al. Ocular Phenotypes in Patients With Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A Retrospective Analysis in a Single Center Over 7 Years. Am J Ophthalmol. 2023;253:119–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.05.011
García-Domínguez M. et al. Atypical eye manifestation in macrophage activation syndrome complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis // Alergia, Asma e Inmunología Pediátricas. – 2020. – Vol. 29. – No. 2. – P. 66-70.
Kriulin I.A., Alekseeva E.I., Shilgrot I.Yu., Dvoryakovskaya T.M. Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: prognostic model and early development markers in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Results of a cohort retrospective study. Voprosy Prakticheskoy Pediatrii = Clinical Practice in Pediatrics. 2022; 17(6): 17–24. DOI: 10.20953/1817-7646-2022-6-17-24 (In Russ.)
Pan S, Yu H, Surti A, et al. Pharmacodynamics of rituximab on B lymphocytes in paediatric patients with autoimmune diseases. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85:1790–7. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13970
McAtee CL, Lubega J, Underbrink K, et al. Association of Rituximab Use With Adverse Events in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2036321. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36321
Smolewska E, Cebula B, Brózik H, et al. Relationship between impaired apoptosis of lymphocytes and distribution of dendritic cells in peripheral blood and synovial fluid of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2008;56:283–9. doi: 10.1007/s00005-008-0030-5
Hsin Y-C, Zhuang L-Z, Yeh K-W, et al. Risk of Tuberculosis in Children with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Taiwan. PloS One. 2015;10:e0128768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128768
Bzarova T., Alekseeva E., Akulova S. A case of Epstein-Barr virus infection mimicking the systemic variant of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Issues of Modern Pediatrics. 2007;6(3):101-106.
Özkoç S, Bayram Deli̇Baş S. Investigation of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia and Colonization in Iatrogenically Immunosuppressed and Immunocompetent Patients. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2015;49:221–30. doi: 10.5578/mb.9344
Bateman M, Oladele R, Kolls JK. Diagnosing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: A review of current methods and novel approaches. Med Mycol. 2020;58:1015–28. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myaa024
Park JW, Curtis JR, Kim MJ, et al. Pneumocystis pneumonia in patients with rheumatic diseases receiving prolonged, non-high-dose steroids—clinical implication of primary prophylaxis using trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:207. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1996-6
Sulieman SE, Metjian TA, Zaoutis TE, et al. Pneumocystis Pneumonia: Epidemiology and Options for Prophylaxis in Non-HIV Immunocompromised Pediatric Patients. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2014;8:45–55. doi: 10.1007/s12281-014-0177-y
García-Moreno J, Melendo-Pérez S, Martín-Gómez MT, et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in children. A retrospective study in a single center over three decades. Enfermedades Infecc Microbiol Clínica. 2020;38:111–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2019.05.005
Kim YW, Kwon BS, Lim SY, et al. Diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial washing in sputum-scarce or smear-negative cases with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis: a randomized study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26:911–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.013
Daelemans, Siel & Peeters, Linde & Wachter, Elke & Malfroot, Anne. (2019). Challenges in Diagnosing Mycobacterial Infections in Children.. 21. 194-199.
Solovic I, Sester M, Gomez-Reino JJ, et al. The risk of tuberculosis related to tumour necrosis factor antagonist therapies: a TBNET consensus statement. Eur Respir J. 2010;36:1185–206. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00028510
Qu Y, Liu M, Sun X, et al. Development and evaluation of a triplex droplet digital PCR method for differentiation of M. tuberculosis, M. bovis and BCG. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1397792. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1397792
Bal ZS, Yazici P, Sen S, et al. A fatal case of tuberculous meningitis in a child with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a diagnostic challenge. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017;50:709–11. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0410-2016
Noguera-Julian A, Calzada-Hernández J, Brinkmann F, et al. Tuberculosis Disease in Children and Adolescents on Therapy With Antitumor Necrosis Factor-ɑ Agents: A Collaborative, Multicenter Paediatric Tuberculosis Network European Trials Group (ptbnet) Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:2561–9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1138
Restrepo-Gualteros SM, Gutierrez MJ, Villamil-Osorio M, et al. Challenges and Clinical Implications of the Diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus Lung Infection in Children. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019;21:24. doi: 10.1007/s11908-019-0681-x
Lyu J, Deng Q, Li R, et al. Pneumonia Caused by Coinfection with Cytomegalovirus and Pneumocystis jirovecii in an HIV-Negative Infant Diagnosed by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;Volume 15:3417–25. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S364241
Ramos JT, Romero CA, Belda S, et al. Clinical practice update of antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised children. Rev Espanola Quimioter Publicacion Of Soc Espanola Quimioter 2019;32:410–25.
Tragiannidis A, Kyriakidis I, Zündorf I, et al. Invasive fungal infections in pediatric patients treated with tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. Mycoses. 2017;60:222–9. doi: 10.1111/myc.12576
Sandau KE, Funk M, Auerbach A, et al. Update to Practice Standards for Electrocardiographic Monitoring in Hospital Settings: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;136. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000527
Lazzerini PE, Capecchi PL, Guideri F, et al. Comparison of Frequency of Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Positive Versus Negative Anti-Ro/SSA and Connective Tissue Disease. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1029–34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.04.048
Caforio ALP, Adler Y, Agostini C, et al. Diagnosis and management of myocardial involvement in systemic immune-mediated diseases: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2649–62. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx321
Malattia C, Tzaribachev N, van den Berg JM, et al. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis - the role of imaging from a rheumatologist’s perspective. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48:785–91. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-4014-7
Malattia C, Tolend M, Mazzoni M, et al. Current status of MR imaging of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2020;34:101629. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2020.101629
Zhang P, Li X, Li Y, et al. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome secondary to systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A case report and review of the literature. Biomed Rep. 2015;3:55–8. doi: 10.3892/br.2014.380
Koenig MK, Perez M, Rothenberg S, et al. Juvenile Onset Central Nervous System Folate Deficiency and Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Child Neurol. 2008;23:106–7. doi: 10.1177/0883073807307986
Coşkun AN, Günbey C, Göçmen R, et al. Concurrence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and primary demyelinating disease in a young child. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;27:20–2. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.002
Lourenço DMR, Buscatti IM, Lourenço B, et al. Neurite óptica em paciente com artrite idiopática juvenil. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2014;54:486–9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbr.2014.01.011
Weng Y, Yi C, Liang H, et al. The Brain Structural-Functional Vulnerability in Drug-Naive Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Insights From the Hippocampus. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;16:833602. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.833602
Mavrogeni S, Koutsogeorgopoulou L, Dimitroulas T, et al. Combined Brain/Heart Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2020;16:178–86. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666190801122105
Zajaczkowska M, Papierkowski A, Szczepanowska A, et al. [Influence of glucocorticoid steroid therapy on gastric and duodenal mucosa and Helicobacter pylori infection in children with nephrotic syndrome]. Pol Merkur Lek Organ Pol Tow Lek. 2001;10:165–7.
Galindo-Zavala R, Bou-Torrent R, Magallares-López B, et al. Expert panel consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of secondary osteoporosis in children. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2020;18:20. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-0411-9
Buckley L, Guyatt G, Fink HA, et al. 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: ACR guideline for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:1521–37. doi: 10.1002/art.40137
Harari S, Paciocco G, Aramu S. Ear and nose involvement in systemic diseases. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis Arch Monaldi Mal Torace. 2000;55:466–70.
Stoustrup P, Resnick CM, Abramowicz S, et al. Management of Orofacial Manifestations of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Interdisciplinary Consensus‐Based Recommendations. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023;75:4–14. doi: 10.1002/art.42338
Walton AG, Welbury RR, Thomason JM, et al. Oral health and juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a review. Rheumatology. 2000;39:550–5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.5.550
Angeles-Han ST, Ringold S, Beukelman T, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Screening, Monitoring, and Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71:703–16. doi: 10.1002/acr.23871
Constantin T, Foeldvari I, Anton J, et al. Consensus-based recommendations for the management of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SHARE initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1107–17. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213131
Arsenaki E, Georgakopoulos P, Mitropoulou P, et al. Cardiovascular Disease in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2020;18:580–91. doi: 10.2174/1570161118666200408121307
Hou J, Song FY, Xu YJ, et al. [Analysis of 13 cases with pediatric rheumatic disease combined with endocrine disorder]. Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi Chin J Pediatr. 2021;59:865–70. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112140-20210303-00178
Whittle, Vanessa & Gane, J & Cheetham, T. (2017). G169(P) Management of steroid induced diabetes in children: A national perspective. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 102. A69.1-A69. 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313087.168.
Hsieh L-F, Mao H-F, Lu C-C, et al. 31 - Rheumatologic Rehabilitation. In: Cifu DX, ed. Braddom’s Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (Sixth Edition). Philadelphia: Elsevier 2021:606-626.e1.
Prothero L, Barley E, Galloway J, et al. The evidence base for psychological interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review of reviews. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;82:20–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.03.008
Sestan M, Grguric D, Sedmak M, et al. Quality of life in children suffering from juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Rheumatol Int. 2020;40:1117–21. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04536-1
Berntson L. A pilot study of possible anti-inflammatory effects of the specific carbohydrate diet in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2021;19:88. doi: 10.1186/s12969-021-00577-3
Caetano MC, Ortiz TT, Terreri MTSRLA, et al. Inadequate dietary intake of children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2009;85:509–15. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1941
Fc A. The Portuguese Society of Rheumatology position paper on the use of biosimilars – 2017 update. 2017.
Atzeni F, Sebastiani M, Ricci C, et al. Position paper of Italian rheumatologists on the use of biosimilar drugs.
Abad Hernández MÁ, Andreu JL, Caracuel Ruiz MÁ, et al. Position Paper From the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on Biosimilar Drugs. Reumatol Clínica Engl Ed. 2015;11:269–78. doi: 10.1016/j.reumae.2015.03.012
Huizinga TWJ, Torii Y, Muniz R. Adalimumab Biosimilars in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Biosimilarity. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8:41–61. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00259-8
Lim LSH, Lokku A, Pullenayegum E, et al. Probability of Response in the First Sixteen Weeks After Starting Biologics: An Analysis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Biologics Trials. Arthritis Care Res. 2023;acr.25003. doi: 10.1002/acr.25003
Ravelli A, Consolaro A, Horneff G, et al. Treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:819–28. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213030
Ringold S, Angeles‐Han ST, Beukelman T, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Non‐Systemic Polyarthritis, Sacroiliitis, and Enthesitis. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71:717–34. doi: 10.1002/acr.23870
Shi C-L, Zhang Y, Zhang Z-Y, et al. Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Indian Pediatr. 2021;58:162–8.
Levy DM, Imundo LF. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A survey of practices and concerns of pediatric medical and surgical specialists and a summary of available safety data. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2010;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-8-7
Litalien C, Jacqz-Aigrain E. Risks and benefits of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children. Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(11):817-58.
Hollingworth P. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in paediatric rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology. 1993;32(1):73-7.
Guillaume-Czitrom S. Les anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens dans les rhumatismes inflammatoires chroniques de l’enfant [Non -steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in chronic inflammatory arthritis in children]. La Lettre du Rhumatologue №379-380 - février-mars 2012.
Gupta P, Sachdev HP. Safety of oral use of nimesulide in children: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Indian Pediatr. 2003 Jun;40(6):518-31. PMID: 12824661.
Todd PA, Sorkin EM. Diclofenac Sodium: A Reappraisal of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Efficacy. Drugs. 1988;35:244–85. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198835030-00004
Alekseeva E, Bizarova T. [Diagnostic and treatment algorithm for juvenile arthritis]. Voprosy Sovremennoi Pediatrii. 2010;9(6):78-104. (In Russ.)
Standing J. F. Diclofenac for acute pain in children: Pharmacokinetics and safety. – University of London, University College London (United Kingdom), 2007.
Petty RE, Laxer RM, Lindsley CB, et al. Textbook of pediatric rheumatology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Inc 2020.
Levy DM, Imundo LF. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A survey of practices and concerns of pediatric medical and surgical specialists and a summary of available safety data. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2010;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-8-7
Litalien C, Jacqz-Aigrain E. Risks and benefits of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children. Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(11):817-58.
Hollingworth P. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in paediatric rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology. 1993;32(1):73-7.
Guillaume-Czitrom S. Les anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens dans les rhumatismes inflammatoires chroniques de l’enfant [Non -steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in chronic inflammatory arthritis in children]. La Lettre du Rhumatologue №379-380 - février-mars 2012.
Gupta P, Sachdev HP. Safety of oral use of nimesulide in children: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Indian Pediatr. 2003 Jun;40(6):518-31. PMID: 12824661.
Alekseeva E., Valieva S. Evaluation of efficacy, tolerability, and safety of nimesulide in children with juvenile arthritis. Voprosy sovremennoy pediatrii. 2007;6(6):76-80.
Zulian F, Martini G, Gobber D, et al. Comparison of intra-articular triamcinolone hexacetonide and triamcinolone acetonide in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2003;42:1254–9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg358
https://neo.barnlakarforeningen.se/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2015/05/Medical-treatment-of-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis.pdf.
Rubin S, Ohana O, Goldberg O, et al. The efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of triamcinolone acetonide versus triamcinolone hexacetonide for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2022;20:5. doi: 10.1186/s12969-022-00666-x
Zulian F. Triamcinolone acetonide and hexacetonide intra-articular treatment of symmetrical joints in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a double-blind trial. Rheumatology. 2004;43:1288–91. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh313
Hetland ML, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Junker P, et al. Combination treatment with methotrexate, cyclosporine, and intraarticular betamethasone compared with methotrexate and intraarticular betamethasone in early active rheumatoid arthritis: An investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1401–9. doi: 10.1002/art.21796
Scherer J, Rainsford KD, Kean CA, et al. Pharmacology of intra-articular triamcinolone. Inflammopharmacology. 2014;22:201–17. doi: 10.1007/s10787-014-0205-0
Beukelman T, Patkar NM, Saag KG, et al. 2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: initiation and safety monitoring of therapeutic agents for the treatment of arthritis and systemic features. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:465–82. doi: 10.1002/acr.20460
Onel K, Rumsey DG, Shenoi S. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treatment Updates. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2021;47:545–63. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2021.07.009
Schiappapietra B, Varnier G, Rosina S, et al. Glucocorticoids in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Neuroimmunomodulation. 2015;22:112–8. doi: 10.1159/000362732
Nasef S. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: An Overview for the Clinicians. Suez Canal Univ Med J. 2021;24:93–103. doi: 10.21608/scumj.2021.192012
Batu ED. Glucocorticoid treatment in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2019;39:13–27. doi: 10.1007/s00296-018-4168-0
Ravelli A, Davì S, Bracciolini G, et al. Intra-articular corticosteroids versus intra-articular corticosteroids plus methotrexate in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2017;389:909–16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30065-X
Ferrara G, Mastrangelo G, Barone P, et al. Methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: advice and recommendations from the MARAJIA expert consensus meeting. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2018;16:46. doi: 10.1186/s12969-018-0255-8
Woo P, Southwood TR, Prieur AM, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of low-dose oral methotrexate in children with extended oligoarticular or systemic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:1849–57. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200008)43:8<1849::AID-ANR22>3.0.CO;2-F
Ruperto N, Murray KJ, Gerloni V, et al. A randomized trial of parenteral methotrexate comparing an intermediate dose with a higher dose in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who failed to respond to standard doses of methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:2191–201. doi: 10.1002/art.20288
Giannini EH, Brewer EJ, Kuzmina N, et al. Methotrexate in Resistant Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of the U.S.A.–U.S.S.R. Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1043–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199204163261602
Ravelli, A., Migliavacca, D., Viola, S., Ruperto, N., Pistorio, A., & Martini, A. (1999). Efficacy of folinic arid in reducing methotrexate toxicity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clinical and experimental rheumatology, 17, 625-627.
LRI Children’s Hospital Paediatric Rheumatology Methotrexate therapy/ url https://secure.library.leicestershospitals.nhs.uk/PAGL/Shared%20Documents/Methotrexate%20Therapy%20in%20Paediatric%20Rheumatology%20UHL%20Childrens%20Hospital%20Guideline.pdf.
Niehues T, Lankisch P. Recommendations for the Use of Methotrexate in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Pediatr Drugs. 2006;8:347–56. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200608060-00003
Calvo I, Antón J, López Robledillo JC, et al. Recomendaciones para el uso de metotrexato en pacientes con artritis idiopática juvenil. An Pediatría. 2016;84:177.e1-177.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2015.05.005
Silverman E, Spiegel L, Hawkins D, et al. Long-term open-label preliminary study of the safety and efficacy of leflunomide in patients with polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:554–62. doi: 10.1002/art.20861
Foeldvari I, Wierk A. Effectiveness of leflunomide in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in clinical practice. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:1763–7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090874
Shepherd J, Cooper K, Harris P, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of abatacept, adalimumab, etanercept and tocilizumab for treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2016;20:1–222. doi: 10.3310/hta20340
Brunner HI, Ruperto N, Tzaribachev N, et al. Subcutaneous golimumab for children with active polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised-withdrawal trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:21–9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210456
Burmester GR, Panaccione R, Gordon KB, et al. Adalimumab: long-term safety in 23 458 patients from global clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis and Crohn’s disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:517–24. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2011-201244
Foeldvari I, Constantin T, Vojinović J, et al. Etanercept treatment for extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis, or psoriatic arthritis: 6-year efficacy and safety data from an open-label trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:125. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1916-9
Ruperto N, Brunner HI, Ramanan AV, et al. Subcutaneous dosing regimens of tocilizumab in children with systemic or polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2021;60:4568–80. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab047
Ruperto N, Brunner HI, Synoverska O, et al. Tofacitinib in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2021;398:1984–96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01255-1
Burrone M, Mazzoni M, Naddei R, et al. Looking for the best strategy to treat children with new onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis: presentation of the “comparison of STep-up and step-down therapeutic strategies in childhood ARthritiS” (STARS) trial. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2022;20:80. doi: 10.1186/s12969-022-00739-x
Lovell DJ, Giannini EH, Reiff A, et al. Etanercept in children with polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:763–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003163421103
A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Upadacitinib in Pediatric Subjects With Polyarticular Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. https://ClinicalTrials.gov/show/NCT03725007.
Juhl CB, Cagnotto G, Ahlström F, et al. TNF-alpha inhibitors for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Published Online First: 28 August 2020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013715
Yamaoka K, Oku K. JAK inhibitors in rheumatology. Immunol Med. 2023;1–10. doi: 10.1080/25785826.2023.2172808
Conaghan PG, Mysler E, Tanaka Y, et al. Upadacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Benefit–Risk Assessment Across a Phase III Program. Drug Saf. 2021;44:515–30. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01036-w
Kühn A, Horneff G. Januskinase-Inhibitoren in der Kinderrheumatologie: Janus kinase inhibitors in pediatric rheumatology. Arthritis Rheuma. 2021;41:137–47. doi: 10.1055/a-1400-4468
van Vollenhoven R, Hall S, Wells AF, et al. AB0333 Sustainability of response to upadacitinib among patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:1290–1. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.1191
Fantus SA, Ruderman EM. Updates in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Curr Treat Options Rheumatol. 2021;7:99–111. doi: 10.1007/s40674-021-00173-2
Alekseeva E.I., Krekhova E.A., Kriulin I.A., Kriulina T.Yu., Dvoryakovskaya T.M., Isaeva K.B., Chistyakova E.G., Chomakhidze A.M., Lomakina O.L., Fetisova A.N., Chibisova K.V., Tsulukiya I.T., Shingarova M.Sh., Botova M.S., Kondratyeva N.M., Kokina M.Yu., Rumyantsev M.A. Experience with the JAK inhibitor upadacitinib in children with rheumatic diseases. Voprosy prakticheskoy pediatrii. 2024; 19(2): 59–79. DOI: 10.20953/1817-7646-2024-2-59-79.
Anink J, Otten MH, Prince FHM, et al. Tumour necrosis factor-blocking agents in persistent oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results from the Dutch Arthritis and Biologicals in Children Register. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2013;52:712–7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes373
Bergman M, Patel P, Chen N, et al. Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8:109–18. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00256-x
Yue X, Huang B, Hincapie AL, et al. Comparative effectiveness and persistence of TNFi and non-TNFi in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a large paediatric rheumatology centre in the USA. Rheumatology. 2021;60:4063–73. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa877
Galstyan L.A., Zholobova E.S., Suchkova D.V., Chebysheva S.N., Meleshkina A.V. Experience of effective long-term use of adalimumab in the treatment of a patient with early-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis and uveitis // Pediatrics. Consilium Medicum. - 2020. - No. 2. - P. 67-71. doi: 10.26442/26586630.2020.2.200233
Fernandez JM, Madsen S, Krase JM, et al. Classification and mitigation of negative injection experiences with biologic medications. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e13240. doi: 10.1111/dth.13240
Instructions for medical use of the medicinal product Enbrel LP-0021220931121.
Instructions for medical use of the medicinal product Etanercept PSK LP-007057-310521.
Instructions for medical use of the medicinal product Erelzi LP-006650-141220.
Instructions for medical use of the medicinal product Enbrel LSR-006652/09-050315 with Amendments No. 3.
FAS Letter dated 22.12.2021 No. TN/109573/21 "On the preparation of documentation for the procurement of medicinal products with the INN "Etanercept."
Houlton S. Benefits and drawbacks of moving to biosimilar medicines. Prescriber. 2019;30:13–5. doi: 10.1002/psb.1773
Horneff G, Klein A, Klotsche J, et al. Comparison of treatment response, remission rate and drug adherence in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab or tocilizumab. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016;18:272. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1170-3
Prabu N, Petciappan V, Anand G, et al. AB1250 Tofacitinib is a safe and effective treatment option for juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:1735.4-1736. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3173
Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Quartier P, et al. Abatacept in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial. The Lancet. 2008;372:383–91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60998-8
Kaegi C, Wuest B, Schreiner J, et al. Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab in Treating Immune-Mediated Disorders. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1990. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01990
Alexeeva EI, Valieva SI, Bzarova TM, et al. Efficacy and safety of repeat courses of rituximab treatment in patients with severe refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30:1163–72. doi: 10.1007/s10067-011-1720-7
Kearsley-Fleet L, Sampath S, McCann LJ, et al. Use and effectiveness of rituximab in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a cohort study in the United Kingdom. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2019;58:331–5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key306
Sakamoto AP, Pinheiro MM, Barbosa CMPL, et al. Uso de rituximabe em adultos jovens com diagnóstico de artrite idiopática juvenil refratária ao tratamento convencional: relato de 6 casos. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2015;55:536–41. doi: 10.1016/j.rbr.2014.12.015
Genovese MC, Fleischmann R, Combe B, et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (SELECT-BEYOND): a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trial. The Lancet. 2018;391:2513–24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31116-4
Foster HE, Minden K, Clemente D, et al. EULAR/PReS standards and recommendations for the transitional care of young people with juvenile-onset rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:639–46. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210112
Magnani A, Pistorio A, Magni-Manzoni S, et al. Achievement of a state of inactive disease at least once in the first 5 years predicts better outcome of patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:628–34. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.080560
Kaplan MM, Kurt T, Polat MC, et al. Predictors of relapse in patients with oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis in remission off medication. Eur J Pediatr. 2023;182:4557–64. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05123-9
Barbar-Smiley, F., Cooper, A., Edelheit, B., Flanagan, E., Gillespie-Taylor, M., Hays, K., ... & Veiga, K. SUPPLEMENTARY APPENDIX 3: Evidence Report 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA): Therapeutic Approaches for Oligoarthritis, Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) Arthritis and Systemic JIA.
Onel KB, Horton DB, Lovell DJ, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Oligoarthritis, Temporomandibular Joint Arthritis, and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74:553–69. doi: 10.1002/art.42037
Crayne CB, Beukelman T. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Oligoarthritis and Polyarthritis. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2018;65:657–74. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.03.005
Güngörer V, Öztürk M, Özlü MY, et al. What is the impact of methotrexate on liver in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis? Results of liver SWE performed in a single centre. Mod Rheumatol. 2022;32:776–82. doi: 10.1093/mr/roab064
van Ede AE, Laan RF, Rood MJ, et al. Effect of folic or folinic acid supplementation on the toxicity and efficacy of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: a forty-eight week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:1515–24. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200107)44:7<1515::AID-ART273>3.0.CO;2-7
Onel KB, Horton DB, Lovell DJ, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Oligoarthritis, Temporomandibular Joint Arthritis, and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74:553–69. doi: 10.1002/art.42037
Herlin T. Tocilizumab: The evidence for its place in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Core Evid. 2009;181. doi: 10.2147/CE.S5992
Imagawa T, Yokota S, Mori M, et al. Safety and efficacy of tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6-receptor monoclonal antibody, in patients with polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Mod Rheumatol. 2012;22:109–15. doi: 10.3109/s10165-011-0481-0
Dubko M, Kalashnikova O, Kostik M, et al. AB0554 Abatacept (ORENCIA): Experience of practical application. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;71:670.3-670. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-eular.554
Choi JY, Chung JE, Park JH, et al. Surveillance of adverse drug events associated with etanercept prescribed for juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a single center up to 9-years: A retrospective observational study. PLOS ONE. 2018;13:e0204573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204573
Ayaz NA, Karadağ ŞG, Koç R, et al. Patient satisfaction and clinical effectiveness of switching from intravenous tocilizumab to subcutaneous tocilizumab in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an observational study. Rheumatol Int. 2020;40:1111–6. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04596-3
Walscheid K, Glandorf K, Rothaus K, et al. Enthesitis-related Arthritis: Prevalence and Complications of Associated Uveitis in Children and Adolescents From a Population-based Nationwide Study in Germany. J Rheumatol. 2021;48:262–9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.191085
Ward MM, Deodhar A, Akl EA, et al. American College of Rheumatology/Spondylitis Association of America/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network 2015 Recommendations for the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68:282–98. doi: 10.1002/art.39298
Burgos-Vargas R. A 26 week randomised, double blind, placebo controlled exploratory study of sulfasalazine in juvenile onset spondyloarthropathies. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:941–2. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.10.941
Van Rossum MAJ, Van Soesbergen RM, Boers M, et al. Long-term outcome of juvenile idiopathic arthritis following a placebo-controlled trial: sustained benefits of early sulfasalazine treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:1518–24. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.064717
Brooks CD. Sulfasalazine for the management of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:845–53.
Gmuca S, Weiss PF. Evaluation and Treatment of Childhood Enthesitis-Related Arthritis. Curr Treat Options Rheumatol. 2015;1:350–64. doi: 10.1007/s40674-015-0027-2
Weiss PF, Xiao R, Brandon TG, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Tumor Necrosis Factor Agents and Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Therapy in Children with Enthesitis-related Arthritis: The First Year after Diagnosis. J Rheumatol. 2018;45:107–14. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.170251
Windschall D, Müller T, Becker I, et al. Safety and efficacy of etanercept in children with the JIA categories extended oligoarthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriasis arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34:61–9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2744-6
Horneff G, Burgos-Vargas R, Constantin T, et al. Efficacy and safety of open-label etanercept on extended oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis, enthesitis-related arthritis and psoriatic arthritis: part 1 (week 12) of the CLIPPER study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73:1114–22. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203046
Minden K, Niewerth M, Zink A, et al. Long-term outcome of patients with JIA treated with etanercept, results of the biologic register JuMBO. Rheumatology. 2012;51:1407–15. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kes019
Batthish M, Rachlis A, Wong B, et al. Intra-rater reliability of the bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI) and the bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index (BASFI) in children with spondyloarthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2012;10:A45, 1546-0096-10-S1-A45. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-10-S1-A45
Berard RA, Laxer RM. Learning the hard way: clinical trials in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1–2. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-211108
Burgos‐Vargas R, Tse SML, Horneff G, et al. A Randomized, Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Multicenter Study of Adalimumab in Pediatric Patients With Enthesitis‐Related Arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2015;67:1503–12. doi: 10.1002/acr.22657
Horneff G, Fitter S, Foeldvari I, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial with adalimumab for treatment of juvenile onset ankylosing spondylitis (JoAS): significant short term improvement. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14:R230. doi: 10.1186/ar4072
Horneff G, Foeldvari I, Minden K, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Etanercept in Patients With the Enthesitis‐Related Arthritis Category of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Results From a Phase III Randomized, Double‐Blind Study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015;67:2240–9. doi: 10.1002/art.39145
Inman RD, Davis JC, Heijde DVD, et al. Efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase III trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:3402–12. doi: 10.1002/art.23969
Baer J, Klotsche J, Foeldvari I. Secukinumab in the treatment for patients with juvenile enthesitis related arthritis non-responsive to anti-TNF treatment according the Juvenile Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Index. Pathog Rheum Arthritis One Year Rev 2022. 2022;40:620–4. doi: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/1u8y08
Brunner HI, Foeldvari I, Alexeeva E, et al. Secukinumab in enthesitis-related arthritis and juvenile psoriatic arthritis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, treatment withdrawal, phase 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82:154–60. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-222849
Wu P, Huang C, Liao P, et al. Secukinumab in enthesitis‐related arthritis and juvenile psoriatic arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2023;26:2119–21. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.14845
Deodhar A, Sliwinska-Stanczyk P, Xu H, et al. Tofacitinib for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a phase III, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:1004–13. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219601
Van Der Heijde D, Song I-H, Pangan AL, et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis (SELECT-AXIS 1): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2/3 trial. The Lancet. 2019;394:2108–17. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32534-6
Bou R, Adán A, Borrás F, et al. Clinical management algorithm of uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: interdisciplinary panel consensus. Rheumatol Int. 2015;35:777–85. doi: 10.1007/s00296-015-3231-3
Foeldvari I, Wierk A. Methotrexate is an effective treatment for chronic uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The Journal of Rheumatology. 2005;32(2):362-365.
Heiligenhaus A, Mingels A, Heinz C, et al. Methotrexate for Uveitis Associated with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Value and Requirement for Additional Anti-Inflammatory Medication. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17:743–8. doi: 10.1177/112067210701700509
Oray M, Tuğal-Tutkun İ. Treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Turkish Journal of Ophthalmology. 2016;46(2):77.
Tappeiner C, Roesel M, Heinz C, et al. Limited value of cyclosporine A for the treatment of patients with uveitis associated with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Eye Lond Engl. 2009;23:1192–8. doi: 10.1038/eye.2008.174
Daniel E, Thorne JE, Newcomb CW, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil for ocular inflammation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;149:423-432.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2009.09.026
Sen E. S., Ramanan A. V. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis //Clinical Immunology. – 2020. – Vol. 211. – P. 108322.
Horton S, Jones AP, Guly CM, et al. Adalimumab in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis: 5-Year Follow-up of the Bristol Participants of the SYCAMORE Trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019;207:170–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.06.007
Lanz S, Seidel G, Skrabl-Baumgartner A. Golimumab in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis unresponsive to Adalimumab. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2021;19:132. doi: 10.1186/s12969-021-00630-1
Ramanan A. V. et al. Tocilizumab in patients with anti-TNF refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis (APTITUDE): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial //The Lancet Rheumatology. – 2020. – Vol. 2. – №. 3. – P. e135-e141.
Babu K, Mooss V, Rao A. Tofacitinib in juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Indian J Ophthalmol - Case Rep. 2022;2:911. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_789_22
Chen JL, Abiri P, Tsui E. Recent advances in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis–associated uveitis. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021;13:251584142098457. doi: 10.1177/2515841420984572
Thomas J, Kuthyar S, Shantha JG, et al. Update on biologic therapies for juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Ann Eye Sci. 2021;6:19–19. doi: 10.21037/aes-2019-dmu-10
Kenawy N, Cleary G, Mewar D, et al. Abatacept: a potential therapy in refractory cases of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;249:297–300. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1523-6
Alcântara AC de C, Leite CAC, Leite ACRM, et al. A longterm prospective real-life experience with leflunomide in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:338–44. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130294
Jahan A, Dewan V, Yadav TP. Leflunomide in systemic onset Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:750–2. doi: 10.1007/s13312-012-0139-9
Oray M, Tuğal-Tutkun İ. Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Associated Uveitis. Turk J Ophthalmol. 2016;46:77–82. doi: 10.4274/tjo.09581
Doycheva D. et al. Mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of uveitis in children //British journal of ophthalmology. – 2007. – Vol. 91. – №. 2. – P. 180-184.
Baquet-Walscheid K, Heinz C, Rath T, et al. Beneficial Effect of Upadacitinib in an Adult Patient with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-associated Uveitis after Unsatisfactory Response to Tofacitinib: A Case Report. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2022;1–2. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2022.2069128
Tappeiner C, Miserocchi E, Bodaghi B, et al. Abatacept in the Treatment of Severe, Longstanding, and Refractory Uveitis Associated with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2015;42:706–11. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.140410
Ravelli A, Davì S, Minoia F, et al. Macrophage Activation Syndrome. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2015;29:927–41. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2015.06.010
Henter J-I. Treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with HLH-94 immunochemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 2002;100:2367–73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0172
La Rosée P, Horne A, Hines M, et al. Recommendations for the management of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in adults. Blood. 2019;133:2465–77. doi: 10.1182/blood.2018894618
Stephan J. L. et al. Reactive haemophagocytic syndrome in children with inflammatory disorders. A retrospective study of 24 patients //Rheumatology. – 2001. – Т. 40. – №. 11. – С. 1285-1292.
I.A.Kriulin IAK, Kriulin IA, National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow, Russian Federation, et al. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: mechanisms of development, clinical manifestations, and treatments. Vopr Prakt Pediatr. 2021;16:94–102. doi: 10.20953/1817-7646-2021-6-94-102
Ramanan A. V., Schneider R. Macrophage activation syndrome following initiation of etanercept in a child with systemic onset juvenile rheumatoid arthritis //The Journal of rheumatology. – 2003. – Vol. 30. – №. 2. – P. 401-403.
Bruck N. et al. Rapid and sustained remission of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated macrophage activation syndrome through treatment with anakinra and corticosteroids //JCR: Journal of Clinical Rheumatology. – 2011. – Vol. 17. – №. 1. – P. 23-27.
Zhang H, Yang S-W, Fu Y-C, et al. Cytokine storm and targeted therapy in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Immunol Res. 2022;70:566–77. doi: 10.1007/s12026-022-09285-w
Kriulin I.A., Alekseeva E.I., Shilkrot I.Yu., Dvoryakovskaya T.M. Treatment of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Results of a retrospective cohort study. Voprosy Prakticheskoy Pediatrii (Current Pediatrics). 2022; 17(5): 7–19. DOI: 10.20953/1817-7646-2022-5-7-19.
Pelewicz K, Miśkiewicz P. Glucocorticoid Withdrawal—An Overview on When and How to Diagnose Adrenal Insufficiency in Clinical Practice. Diagnostics. 2021;11:728. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040728
Alves C, Robazzi TCV, Mendonça M. Withdrawal from glucocorticosteroid therapy: clinical practice recommendations. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008;84:192–202. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1773
Kuzmina N. I., Shokh B. P., Nikishina I. P. Current perspective on systemic glucocorticosteroid therapy in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis // Scientific and Practical Rheumatology. – 2000. – No. 2. – P. 56-62.
Mouy R. et al. Efficacy of cyclosporine A in the treatment of macrophage activation syndrome in juvenile arthritis: report of five cases //The Journal of pediatrics. – 1996. – Vol. 129. – №. 5. – P. 750-754.
Georgiadou S, Gatselis NK, Stefos A, et al. Efficient management of secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravenous steroids and γ-immunoglobulin infusions. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7:3394–406. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i21.3394
Sen E. S., Clarke S. L. N., Ramanan A. V. Macrophage activation syndrome //The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. – 2016. – Vol. 83. – No. 3. – P. 248-253.
Aydın F. et al. Comparison of baseline laboratory findings of macrophage activation syndrome complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children //International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases. – 2021. – Vol. 24. – №. 4. – P. 542-547.
Grom AA, Horne A, De Benedetti F. Macrophage activation syndrome in the era of biologic therapy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12:259–68. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.179
Papa R, Natoli V, Caorsi R, et al. Successful treatment of refractory hyperferritinemic syndromes with canakinumab: a report of two cases. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2020;18:56. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-00450-9
Bhat CS, Shetty R, Ramesh D, et al. Anakinra in Refractory Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C). Indian Pediatr. 2021;58:994–6. doi: 10.1007/s13312-021-2340-1
Kostik MM, Isupova EA, Belozerov K, et al. Standard and increased canakinumab dosing to quiet macrophage activation syndrome in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:894846. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.894846
Phadke O, Rouster-Stevens K, Giannopoulos H, et al. Intravenous administration of anakinra in children with macrophage activation syndrome. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2021;19:98. doi: 10.1186/s12969-021-00585-3
Pal P, Bathia J, Giri PP, et al. Macrophage activation syndrome in pediatrics: 10 years data from an Indian center. Int J Rheum Dis. 2020;23:1412–6. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13915
Wei A, Ma H, Li Z, et al. Short-term effectiveness of ruxolitinib in the treatment of recurrent or refractory hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in children. Int J Hematol. 2020;112:568–76. doi: 10.1007/s12185-020-02936-4
Kostik MM, Raupov RK, Suspitsin EN, et al. The Safety and Efficacy of Tofacitinib in 24 Cases of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases: Single Centre Experience. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:820586. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.820586
Gómez Conde Santa Yarelis, Carrión Mendoza Reynaldo, del Toro Ravelo Laydenis María, Chia Proenza Daniel. Síndrome de activación de macrofágica como complicación de la artritis idiopática juvenil sistémica. Rev Cuba Reumatol [Internet]. 2021 Ago [citado 2022 Ago 02] ; 23( 2 ): e209. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1817-59962021000200011&lng=es. Epub 01-Ago-2021.
Rovin BH, Adler SG, Barratt J, et al. KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases. Kidney Int. 2021;100:S1–276. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021
Rao S, Abzug MJ, Carosone-Link P, et al. Intravenous Acyclovir and Renal Dysfunction in Children: A Matched Case Control Study. J Pediatr. 2015;166:1462-1468.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.01.023
Kimberlin DW. Acyclovir Dosing in the Neonatal Period and Beyond. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2013;2:179–82. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pis138
Widasmara D, Firdausiya F. Disseminated Herpes Zoster on a Child with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;Volume 14:2777–85. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S314220
Balfour HH, McMonigal KA, Bean B. Acyclovir therapy of varicella-zoster virus infections in immunocompromised patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983;12:169–79. doi: 10.1093/jac/12.suppl_B.169
Whitley RJ. Herpes simplex virus in children. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2002;4:231–7. doi: 10.1007/s11940-002-0040-2
Antiviral Drugs in Children and Adolescents. Pediatr Infect Dis. 2020;1:123–8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10081-1221
Adler SP, Marshall B. Cytomegalovirus Infections. ;11.
Shim GH. Treatment of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2023;66:384–94. doi: 10.3345/cep.2022.01032
Lin X, Wan Y, Liu Y. Efficacy of ganciclovir in the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in infants and its effect on inflammatory reaction and immune function. Am J Transl Res. 2023;15:6514–23.
Zhang S, Zhu Y, Jin Y, et al. Difference between Acyclovir and Ganciclovir in the Treatment of Children with Epstein–Barr Virus-Associated Infectious Mononucleosis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2021/8996934
Chellapandian D, Das R, Zelley K, et al. Treatment of Epstein Barr virus-induced haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with rituximab-containing chemo-immunotherapeutic regimens. Br J Haematol. 2013;162:376–82. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12386
Andrews A, Hickling P. Thrombosis associated with antiphospholipid antibody in juvenile chronic arthritis. Lupus. 1997;6:556–7. doi: 10.1177/096120339700600616
Thomas KN, Aggarwal A. Childhood rheumatic diseases: bites not only the joint, but also the heart. Clin Rheumatol. 2023;42:2703–15. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06621-9
Carcillo JA, Shakoory B, Castillo L. Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, and Hyperferritinemic Sepsis-Induced Multiple-Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in the Pediatric ICU. In: Mastropietro CW, Valentine KM, eds. Pediatric Critical Care. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2019:245–55.
Alekseeva E., Valieva S., Bzarova T., Semikina E., Isaeva K., Lisitsin A., Denisova R., Chistyakova E., Sleptsova T., Mitenko E. Efficacy and safety of domestic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in neutropenias developing during anti-B-cell and immunosuppressive therapy in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Current Pediatrics. 2010;9(4):94-100.
Yilmaz D., Ritchey A. K. Severe neutropenia in children: a single institutional experience //Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. – 2007. – Vol. 29. – No. 8. – P. 513-518.
Segel, G. B., & Halterman, J. S. (2008). Neutropenia in pediatric practice. Pediatrics in review, 29(1), 12.
Jog NR, Young KA, Munroe ME, et al. Association of Epstein-Barr virus serological reactivation with transitioning to systemic lupus erythematosus in at-risk individuals. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:1235–41. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215361
Demirkol D, Yildizdas D, Bayrakci B, et al. Hyperferritinemia in the critically ill child with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/sepsis/multiple organ dysfunction syndrome/macrophage activation syndrome: what is the treatment? Crit Care. 2012;16:R52. doi: 10.1186/cc11256
El-Nawawy A, El-Kinany H, Hamdy El-Sayed M, et al. Intravenous Polyclonal Immunoglobulin Administration to Sepsis Syndrome Patients: A Prospective Study in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. J Trop Pediatr. 2005;51:271–8. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmi011
Vassilopoulos A, McCormick W, Lakhani A. Update in Hyperferritinemic Syndromes: Recognition and Management - A Scoping Review. J Brown Hosp Med. 2022;1. doi: 10.56305/001c.37667
Henter J-I, Horne A, Aricó M, et al. HLH-2004: Diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;48:124–31. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21039
Malakhov O. A. et al. Hip replacement in adolescents with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis // N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. – 2012. – No. 1. – P. 48-52.
Sawhney S, Aggarwal A, Springer Malaysia Representative Office. Pediatric Rheumatology A Clinical Viewpoint. 2018.
Finch SL, Rosenberg AM, Vatanparast H. Vitamin D and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2018;16:34. doi: 10.1186/s12969-018-0250-0
Yamamoto EA, Jørgensen TN. Relationships Between Vitamin D, Gut Microbiome, and Systemic Autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2020;10:3141. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03141
Takken T, Van Brussel M, Engelbert RHH, et al. Exercise therapy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Published Online First: 23 April 2008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005954.pub2
Luttosch F, Baerwald C. Rehabilitation in der Rheumatologie. Internist. 2010;51:1239–45. doi: 10.1007/s00108-010-2626-1
Stucki G, Kroeling P. Physical therapy and rehabilitation in the management of rheumatic disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2000;14:751–71. doi: 10.1053/berh.2000.0111
Kuntze G, Nesbitt C, Whittaker JL, et al. Exercise Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99:178-193.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.030
Sarac DC, Bayraktar D, Ozer Kaya D, et al. The effects of inspiratory muscle training on cardiorespiratory functions in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024;59:562–73. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26783
Elnaggar RK, Mahmoud WS, Abdelbasset WK, et al. Low-energy laser therapy application on knee joints as an auxiliary treatment in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a dual-arm randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2021;37:1737–46. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03427-6
Azab AR, Kamel FH, Basha MA, et al. Impact of Clinical Pilates Exercise on Pain, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Functional Ability, and Quality of Life in Children with Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:7793. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137793
Elnaggar RK, Mahmoud WS, Moawd SA, et al. Impact of core stability exercises on bone mineralization and functional capacity in children with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40:245–53. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05219-9
Elnaggar RK, Elfakharany MS. Aqua-Plyometric Exercises-Induced Changes in Muscle Strength, Bone Mineral Properties, and Physical Fitness in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A 12-Week, Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2023;35:198–205. doi: 10.1123/pes.2022-0044
Tarakci E, Arman N, Tarakci D, et al. Leap Motion Controller–based training for upper extremity rehabilitation in children and adolescents with physical disabilities: A randomized controlled trial. J Hand Ther. 2020;33:220-228.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.03.012
Eid MAM, Aly SM, El-Shamy SM. Effect of Electromyographic Biofeedback Training on Pain, Quadriceps Muscle Strength, and Functional Ability in Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95:921–30. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000524
Elnaggar RK, Elshafey MA. Effects of Combined Resistive Underwater Exercises and Interferential Current Therapy in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95:96–102. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000347
Field T, Hernandez-Reif M, Seligmen S, et al. Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis: Benefits from Massage Theraphy. J Pediatr Psychol. 1997;22:607–17. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/22.5.607
on behalf of PRINTO Egypt, El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, et al. Shared decision-making aid for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: moving from informative patient education to interactive critical thinking. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38:3217–25. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04687-y
Mulligan K, Hirani SP, Harris S, et al. The Effects of a Web-Based Tool for Parents of Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24:e29787. doi: 10.2196/29787
Pérez Ramírez N, Nahuelhual Cares P, San Martín Peñailillo P. Efectividad de la terapia Watsu en pacientes con artritis idiopática juvenil. Un ensayo clínico controlado paralelo, aleatorio y simple ciego. Rev Chil Pediatría. 2019;90:282. doi: 10.32641/rchped.v90i3.886
Beukelman T, Patkar NM, Saag KG, et al. 2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: initiation and safety monitoring of therapeutic agents for the treatment of arthritis and systemic features. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:465–82. doi: 10.1002/acr.20460
Houghton K. Physical activity, physical fitness, and exercise therapy in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Phys Sportsmed. 2012;40:77–82. doi: 10.3810/psm.2012.09.1979
Zuk B, Kaczor Z, Zuk-Drążyk B, et al. Physiotherapy in pauciarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Case study. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2014;16:185–95. doi: 10.5604/15093492.1105236
Epps H, Ginnelly L, Utley M, et al. Is hydrotherapy cost-effective? A randomised controlled trial of combined hydrotherapy programmes compared with physiotherapy land techniques in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Health Technol Assess Winch Engl. 2005;9:iii–iv, ix–x, 1–59. doi: 10.3310/hta9390
Chausset A, Pereira B, Echaubard S, et al. Access to paediatric rheumatology care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: what do we know? A systematic review. Rheumatology. 2020;59:3633–44. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa438
Scott C, Chan M, Slamang W, et al. Juvenile arthritis management in less resourced countries (JAMLess): consensus recommendations from the Cradle of Humankind. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38:563–75. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4304-y
Furer V, Rondaan C, Heijstek MW, et al. 2019 update of EULAR recommendations for vaccination in adult patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79:39–52. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215882
Jansen MHA, Rondaan C, Legger GE, et al. EULAR/PRES recommendations for vaccination of paediatric patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: update 2021. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82:35–47. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222574
Heijstek MW, Ott de Bruin LM, Bijl M, et al. EULAR recommendations for vaccination in paediatric patients with rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1704–12. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.150193
Kokina M.Yu., Fomina D.S., Lebedkina M.S., Mutovina Z.Y., Zholobova E.S., Kurbanova S.Kh., Nargizyan A.K., Fetisova A.N., Andzhel A.E., Dvoryakovskaya T.M., Shilkrot I.Yu., Alekseeva E.I. Efficacy and safety of the two-component monoclonal antibody drug against SARS-CoV-2 (tixagevimab + cilgavimab) for pre-exposure prophylaxis of novel coronavirus infection in immunocompromised pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases. Preliminary results of the first prospective observational cohort study in the Russian Federation. Voprosy Prakticheskoy Pediatrii (Current Pediatrics). 2023; 18(1): 16–26
Alexeeva EI, Dvoryakovskaya TM, Denisova RV, et al. Immunization With a Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine in Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Without Systemic Manifestations: a Prospective Study. Curr Pediatr. 2017;16:493–501. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v16i6.1822
Lomakina O, Alexeeva E, Dvoryakovskaya T, et al. OP0166 Disease activity in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis after simultaneous pcv13 and hib vaccination: a cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80:100.2-100. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.3457
Mori S, Ueki Y, Akeda Y, et al. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving tocilizumab therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1362–6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202658
Alekseeva EI, Van’kova DD, Soloshenko MA, et al. Pneumococcal Vaccine in Patients with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Receiving Biologic Therapy: International Practice Review. Curr Pediatr. 2019;18:101–8. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v18i2.2012
Alexeeva EI, Soloshenko MA, Dvoryakovskaya TM, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Immunization With Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine in Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Open-Label Study. Curr Pediatr. 2017;16:142–7. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v16i2.1715
Mori S, Ueki Y, Akeda Y, et al. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving tocilizumab therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1362–6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202658
Garner AJ, Saatchi R, Ward O, et al. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Review of Novel Diagnostic and Monitoring Technologies. Healthc Basel Switz. 2021;9:1683. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9121683
Novelli, V., & Holzel, H. (1999). Safety and tolerability of fluconazole in children. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 43(8), 1955-1960.
Tepaev RF. Disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome in children. Diagnosis and treatment. Pediatric Pharmacology 2010;7:27–31.
Gurbanov A, Gün E, Botan E, et al. Intravenous Immunoglobulin Use in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Single-Center Experience. 2023.
Baddley JW, Cantini F, Goletti D, et al. ESCMID Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) Consensus Document on the safety of targeted and biological therapies: an infectious diseases perspective (Soluble immune effector molecules [I]: anti-tumor necrosis factor-α agents). Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:S10–20. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.12.025
Valentine SL, Bembea MM, Muszynski JA, et al. Consensus Recommendations for RBC Transfusion Practice in Critically Ill Children From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative. Pediatr Crit Care Med J Soc Crit Care Med World Fed Pediatr Intensive Crit Care Soc. 2018;19:884–98. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001613
Garcia-Lloret M, McGhee S, Chatila TA. Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Children. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2008;28:833–49. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2008.07.001
Rodriguez MM, Wagner-Weiner L. Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Pediatric Rheumatology: When to Use It and What Is the Evidence. Pediatr Ann. 2017;46. doi: 10.3928/19382359-20161214-01
Scientific Centre of Children’s Health, Moscow, Russian Federation, Alexeeva EI, Denisova RV, et al. Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Pediatric Rheumatology Practice. Curr Pediatr Vopr Sovrem Pediatr. 2015;14:219–23. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v14i2.1290
Mulhearn B, Bruce IN. Indications for IVIG in rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology. 2015;54:383–91. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu429
Prasad AN, Chaudhary S. Intravenous immunoglobulin in pediatrics: A review. Med J Armed Forces India. 2014;70:277–80. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.05.011
Khojah AM, Miller ML, Klein-Gitelman MS, et al. Rituximab-associated Hypogammaglobulinemia in pediatric patients with autoimmune diseases. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2019;17:61. doi: 10.1186/s12969-019-0365-y
Núñez Cuadros E, Calzada-Hernández J, Clemente D, et al. Correction to: Position statement of the Spanish society of pediatric rheumatology on infection screening, prophylaxis, and vaccination of pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases and immunosuppressive therapies: part 1 (screening). Eur J Pediatr. 2022;181:2355–2355. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04448-1
Papadopoulou C, Eleftheriou D. How do I ensure safe use of biological agents in children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases? Paediatr Child Health. 2014;24:264–8. doi: 10.1016/j.paed.2013.10.004
Opoka-Winiarska V, Grywalska E, Sobiesiak A, et al. The Impact of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection on Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Activity and Patient’s Response to Treatment. J Clin Med. 2020;9:3453. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113453
Consolaro A, Giancane G, Alongi A, et al. Phenotypic variability and disparities in treatment and outcomes of childhood arthritis throughout the world: an observational cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019;3:255–63. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30027-6
Xu F, Lee FK, Morrow RA, et al. Seroprevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 in Children in the United States. J Pediatr. 2007;151:374–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.065
Aeschlimann FA, Chong S-L, Lyons TW, et al. Risk of Serious Infections Associated with Biologic Agents in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. J Pediatr. 2019;204:162-171.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.065
Santos MJ, Canhão H, Conde M, et al. Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis--December 2011 update. Acta Reumatol Port. 2012;37:48–68.
Koç R, Sönmez HE, Çakan M, et al. Drug reactions in children with rheumatic diseases receiving parenteral therapies: 9 years’ experience of a tertiary pediatric rheumatology center. Rheumatol Int. 2020;40:771–6. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04498-z
Ovsiankina E.S., Gubkina M.F., Panova L.V., Yuhimenko N.V. Methods of tuberculosis infection screening in children and their role in risk group formation and disease diagnosis. Rossiyskiy pediatricheskiy zhurnal. 2017; 20 (2): 108-115. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/1560-9561-2017-20 (2): 108-115.
Allen V, Longley N. Infections in immunosuppressed travellers with autoimmune inflammatory diseases—a narrative review and advice for clinical practice. Rheumatology. 2021;60:3969–76. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab445
Whyte LA, Al-Araji RA, McLoughlin LM. Guidelines for the management of acute gastroenteritis in children in Europe. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2015;100:308–12. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307253
Bockemühl J, Roggentin P. Enterale Yersiniosen. Klinische Bedeutung, Epidemiologie, Diagnostik und Prävention [Intestinal yersiniosis. Clinical importance, epidemiology, diagnosis, and prevention]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2004 Jul;47(7):685-91
Wiger K., Høiby E.A., Wathne K.O. Infections in immunosuppressed children. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening: Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin, ny Raekke. 2005;125(9):1168-1172.
Acebo J.J. et al. Infections in Immunosuppressed Pediatric Patients. Pediatric Surgical Oncology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 1-34.
Society P. I. D. et al. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Children with and Exposed to HIV //ClinicalInfo. HIV. gov [Internet]. – US Department of Health and Human Services, 2023.
Allen UD. Management of infections in the immunocompromised child: General principles. LymphoSign J. 2016;3:87–98. doi: 10.14785/lymphosign-2016-0007
Patrick C. C. Clinical management of infections in immunocompromised infants and children //(No Title). – 2001.
Kwiatkowska B, Filipowicz‑Sosnowska A. Reactive arthritis. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2009;119:60–6. doi: 10.20452/pamw.606
Sharma AP, Norozi K, Filler G, et al. Diagnosis of Pediatric Hypertension: European Society of Hypertension-recommended 24-hr vs. 24-hr-day-night Ambulatory Blood Pressure thresholds. ;23.
Djawe K, Daly KR, Levin L, et al. Humoral Immune Responses to Pneumocystis jirovecii Antigens in HIV-Infected and Uninfected Young Children with Pneumocystis Pneumonia. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e82783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082783
Müller F-M, Trusen A, Weig M. Clinical manifestations and diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised children. Eur J Pediatr. 2002;161:563–74. doi: 10.1007/s00431-002-1041-6
Douglas AP, Smibert OliviaC, Bajel A, et al. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of invasive aspergillosis, 2021. Intern Med J. 2021;51:143–76. doi: 10.1111/imj.15591
Armbrust W, Kamphuis SSM, Wolfs TWF, et al. Tuberculosis in a nine-year-old girl treated with infliximab for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology. 2004;43:527–9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh074
Stern A, Green H, Paul M, et al. Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) in non-HIV immunocompromised patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;CD005590. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005590.pub3
Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Patients: Overview, Causes of Pneumonia, HIV/AIDS. Published Online First: 23 March 2020.
What’s New Adult and Adolescent Opportunistic Infection. AIDSinfo. https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines/html/4/adult-and-adolescent-opportunistic-infection/392/whats-new (accessed 14 April 2020)
Aizawa-Yashiro T, Oki E, Tsuruga K, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy leading to dramatic improvement in a patient with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and severe pericarditis resistant to steroid pulse therapy. Rheumatol Int. 2012;32:1359–61. doi: 10.1007/s00296-010-1413-6
Mofenson LM, Brady MT, Danner SP, et al. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections among HIV-exposed and HIV-infected children: recommendations from CDC, the National Institutes of Health, the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society, and the American Academy of Pediatrics. MMWR Recomm Rep Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Recomm Rep. 2009;58:1–166.
Islam MdA, Khandker SS, Alam SS, et al. Vitamin D status in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2019;18:102392. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102392
Galindo-Zavala R, Bou-Torrent R, Magallares-López B, et al. Expert panel consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of secondary osteoporosis in children. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2020;18:20. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-0411-9
Denisova R., Alekseeva E., Pinelis V., Bakanov M., Valieva S., Bzarova T., Isaeva K., Morev S., Kuznetsova G. Efficacy and safety of intravenous ibandronic acid in severe systemic osteoporosis in patients with juvenile arthritis. Current Pediatrics. 2011;10(6):83–88.
Kutilek S, Plasilova I, Langer J. Ibandronate in the treatment of pediatric osteoporosis. Bone Abstr. Published Online First: 9 June 2015. doi: 10.1530/boneabs.4.P80
Bachrach LK, Ward LM. Clinical Review: Bisphosphonate Use in Childhood Osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:400–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1531
Ansell BM, Chamberlain MA. 11 Children with chronic arthritis: the management of transition to adulthood. Baillières Clin Rheumatol. 1998;12:363–74. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3579(98)80023-X
Nascimento Leite M, Kamper SJ, O’Connell NE, et al. Physical activity and education about physical activity for chronic musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;2023. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013527.pub2
Loctin A, Bailly F, Laroche D, et al. Clinical interest of bone marrow aspiration in rheumatology: a practice-based observational study of 257 bone marrow aspirations. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32:115–21. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2097-y
Koç R, Sönmez HE, Çakan M, et al. Drug reactions in children with rheumatic diseases receiving parenteral therapies: 9 years’ experience of a tertiary pediatric rheumatology center. Rheumatol Int. Published Online First: 21 December 2019. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04498-z
Aghdashi MA, Khadir M, Dinparasti-Saleh R. Antinuclear Antibodies and Lupus-like Manifestations in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients at 4 Months’ Follow-up After Treatment with Infliximab and Etanercept. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2020;16:61–6. doi: 10.2174/1573397115666190506152729
de Camargo MC, Barros BCA, Fulone I, et al. Adverse Events in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis Receiving Long-Term Biological Agents in a Real-Life Setting. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:965. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00965
Puxeddu I, Giori L, Rocchi V, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions during treatment with infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;108:123–4. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.11.004
Sen ES, Ramanan AV. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Clin Immunol Orlando Fla. 2020;211:108322. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2019.108322
Baricitinib in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: an international, phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal, efficacy, and safety trial Ramanan, Athimalaipet VViola, Diego et al. The Lancet, Volume 402, Issue 10401, 555 – 570
Decker RL, StevenErnest C II, Radtke DB, et al. A populationpharmacokinetic model using allometric scaling forbaricitinib in patients with juvenile idiopathicarthritis. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol.2024;13:970-981. doi:10.1002/psp4.13131
Ramanan, A. V., Guly, C., Simonini, G., Keller, S., Sen, P., Holzkaemper, T., & Quartier, P. (2024). OP0101 Effectiveness and safety of baricitinib for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis associated uveitis or chronic anterior antinuclear antibody positive uveitis in children.
Thomas J, Kuthyar S, Shantha JG, Angeles-Han ST, Yeh S. Update on biologic therapies for juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Ann Eye Sci. 2021 Jun;6:19. doi: 10.21037/aes-2019-dmu-10. Epub 2021 Jun 15. PMID: 34131629; PMCID: PMC8202723.
Alekseeva, E. I., and T. M. Bzarova. "Juvenile arthritis: current options for drug and non-drug therapy." Lechaschy Vrach 9 (2011): 60-60.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
These clinical guidelines were prepared by the professional association of pediatric rheumatologists and approved by the working group of the Association of Pediatric Rheumatologists.
1. Alekseeva E.I., Corresponding Member of the RAS, Professor, MD
2. Dvoryakovskaya T.M., MD
3. Shilgrot I.Yu., PhD in Medicine
4. Kostik M.M., MD
5. Nikishina I.P., PhD in Medicine
6. Ushakova S.A., MD, Professor
7. Ulyanova E.A., PhD in Medicine
8. Glazyrina G.A., PhD in Medicine
9. Zholobova E.S., MD, Professor
10. Sudareva O.O., PhD in Medicine
11. Igisheva L.N., MD, Associate Professor
12. Ligostaeva E.A., PhD in Medicine
13. Malievsky V.A., MD, Professor
14. Kriulin I.A., PhD in Medicine, Senior Researcher
15. Kriulina T.Yu., Junior Researcher
16. Kokina M.Yu., Junior Researcher
Conflict of interest: the working group members declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience
Pediatricians
Pediatric rheumatologists of pediatric rheumatology departments
Pediatric rheumatologists of pediatric rheumatology offices in outpatient clinics
Methods used for collecting/selecting evidence: electronic database search.
Description of methods used for assessing the quality and strength of evidence: the evidence base for the recommendations includes publications from the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases. The search depth is 5 years.
Methods used for assessing the quality and strength of evidence:
expert consensus;
assessment of significance in accordance with the rating scheme.
Methods used for analyzing evidence:
reviews of published meta-analyses;
systematic reviews with evidence tables.
Description of methods used for analyzing evidence
When selecting publications as potential sources of evidence, the methodology used in each study is examined to ensure its validity. The result of this examination affects the level of evidence assigned to the publication, which in turn affects the strength of the recommendations.
To minimize potential bias, each study was evaluated independently. Any discrepancies in evaluations were discussed by the full panel of authors. If a consensus could not be reached, an independent expert was involved.
Evidence tables: compiled by the authors of the clinical guidelines.
Methods used for formulating recommendations: expert consensus.
Economic analysis
Cost analysis was not performed, and pharmacoeconomic publications were not analyzed.
Recommendation validation method
External expert review.
Internal expert review.
Description of the recommendation validation method
The draft of these recommendations was reviewed by independent experts who were primarily asked to comment on how comprehensible the interpretation of the evidence underlying the recommendations is.
Feedback was obtained from primary care pediatric rheumatologists regarding the clarity and practical relevance of the proposed recommendations as a daily clinical tool.
All comments received from experts were carefully systematized and discussed by the authors of the recommendations. Each point was discussed individually.
Consultation and peer review
The draft recommendations were reviewed by independent experts who evaluated the clarity and accuracy of the interpretation of the evidence base underlying the recommendations.
Authors
For the final revision and quality control, the recommendations were re-evaluated by the members of the working group, who concluded that all comments and feedback from the experts had been taken into account and the risk of bias in the development of the recommendations was minimized.
Main Recommendations
Table 1. Scale for assessing levels of reliable evidence (LRE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Scale for assessing the levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definition |
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Scale for grading grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Timing of JIA therapy efficacy monitoring
№ | International Nonproprietary Name (INN) of the medicinal product | Timing of therapeutic efficacy monitoring¹ |
1 | Methotrexate** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
2 | Leflunomide** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
3 | Sulfasalazine** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
4 | Tocilizumab** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
5 | Canakinumab** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
6 | Rituximab** | At 16–24 weeks from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
7 | Adalimumab** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
8 | Etanercept** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
9 | Golimumab** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
10 | Abatacept** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
11 | Secukinumab** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
12 | Tofacitinib** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
13 | Upadacitinib** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
14 | Baricitinib** | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
¹ - Therapy adjustment is carried out at any stage of treatment in case of its ineffectiveness and/or lack of safety.
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms
General scheme

Diagram 1

Diagram 2

Diagram 3

Diagram 4

Diagram 5

Diagram 6

Diagram 7

Diagram 8

Diagram 9

Appendix C. Patient Information
1. What is idiopathic arthritis?
What is it?
Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (synonyms: juvenile arthritis, juvenile-onset arthritis) is a chronic disease characterized by persistent joint inflammation. Typical signs of joint inflammation include pain, swelling, and restricted range of motion. "Idiopathic" means that the cause of the disease is unknown, and "juvenile" in this context means that symptom onset typically occurs before the age of 16 years.
What does "chronic disease" mean?
A disease is considered chronic when the appropriate treatment does not always lead to a cure, but helps reduce symptoms and improve laboratory parameters. It also means that once the diagnosis is established, it is impossible to predict how long the child will be ill.
What is its frequency?
JIA is a relatively rare disease affecting approximately 1 to 2 children out of every 1,000.
What are the causes of the disease?
Our immune system protects us against infections caused by various microorganisms, such as viruses or bacteria. It is capable of distinguishing what is potentially foreign and harmful and must be destroyed from what is part of our own body. It is hypothesized that JIA is an abnormal reaction of our immune system, which partially loses its ability to distinguish "foreign" cells from "self", attacking the body's own tissues and leading to inflammation, particularly of the joint lining. For this reason, diseases like JIA are also called "autoimmune". This means that the immune system reacts "against its own organism". However, exact information regarding the mechanisms causing JIA, as with most chronic inflammatory human diseases, remains lacking.
Is this a hereditary disease?
JIA is not a hereditary disease, as it cannot be directly transmitted from parents to their children. Nevertheless, there are a number of genetic factors, mostly unidentified as yet, that create a predisposition to the disease. The scientific community shares a consensus that this disease results from a combination of genetic predisposition and environmental factors (including infectious agents). However, even when a genetic predisposition may be present, it is very rare for two children in the same family to develop this disease.
On what basis is this disease diagnosed?
The diagnosis of JIA is based on the presence and persistence of arthritis, while carefully ruling out any other diseases through a thorough medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests.
A diagnosis of JIA is established if the disease begins before the age of 16, symptoms last for more than 6 weeks, and all other diseases causing arthritis are excluded.
This 6-week period is necessary to rule out other forms of transient arthritis that may result from various infections. The term JIA encompasses all forms of persistent arthritis of unknown origin that begin in childhood. JIA covers various already identified forms of arthritis (see below). Therefore, the diagnosis of JIA is based on the presence and persistence of arthritis with the careful exclusion of any other disease through medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests.
What happens to the joints?
The synovial membrane is a thin inner layer of the joint capsule. In arthritis, it becomes significantly thickened, infiltrated with inflammatory cells, and its tissue becomes inflamed. At the same time, the production of synovial fluid inside the joint increases. This causes swelling, pain, and restricted movement. A characteristic feature of joint inflammation is stiffness, which occurs after prolonged periods of rest, especially noticeable in the morning (morning stiffness).
Often, a child tries to reduce pain by holding the joint in a semi-flexed position. This position is called "antalgic". This term emphasizes that it is aimed at reducing pain. If this incorrect posture persists for a long time (usually more than 1 month), it leads to shortening (contracture) of muscles and tendons and the development of flexion (extension) impairment. If inadequately treated, joint inflammation can lead to joint damage. This occurs through two main mechanisms: severe thickening of the synovial membrane (with the formation of a so-called synovial pannus) and the release of various substances that promote the loss of cartilage and bone tissue. On X-ray examination, this appears as holes in the bone. This is called bone erosion. Prolonged maintenance of an antalgic position causes muscle atrophy, tension or shortening of muscles and soft tissues, leading to flexion impairment.
2. Different types of juvenile arthritis
2.1. Are there different forms of the disease?
There are several forms of JIA. They differ mainly in the number of affected joints (oligoarticular or polyarticular JIA), as well as the presence of additional symptoms such as fever, rash, and others (see following paragraphs). The diagnosis of various forms is made by observing symptoms during the first 6 months of the disease. Therefore, they are also frequently referred to as "onset categories".
2.1.1 Polyarticular JIA
In polyarticular JIA, 5 or more joints are affected during the first 6 months of the disease. Some patients may develop a fever. Determining the blood level of rheumatoid factor (RF) allows differentiation between two types of polyarticular JIA: RF-negative and RF-positive. RF-positive polyarticular JIA: very rare in children (less than 5% of all JIA patients). The disease is the equivalent of RF-positive rheumatoid arthritis in adults (the most common type of chronic arthritis in adults). In this form, arthritis is symmetrical, initially affecting mostly small joints of the hands and feet, with subsequent involvement of other joints. It is much more common in females than in males and typically begins after the child reaches 10 years of age. This disease often follows a severe course. RF-negative polyarticular JIA: this variant accounts for 15-20% of all JIA cases. The disease can develop in children of any age. Any joint can be affected. Typically, both large and small joints become inflamed. In both forms of polyarticular JIA, treatment must be initiated as early as possible, immediately after diagnosis confirmation. Early and adequate treatment is believed to yield the best outcomes. Nevertheless, in early stages of the disease, treatment response is difficult to predict and may vary among children.
2.1.2 Pauciarticular JIA (oligoarticular JIA (persistent or extended))
Oligoarticular JIA is the most common subtype of JIA, accounting for almost 50% of all cases. Characteristic features of this JIA form include fewer than 5 affected joints in the first 6 months and the absence of systemic manifestations. The disease affects large joints (such as the knees and ankles). Arthritis is typically asymmetric. Sometimes only a single joint is affected (monoarticular form). In some patients, the number of affected joints increases after the first 6 months of the disease to 5 or more; this is called "extended oligoarthritis." If the number of affected joints remains under 5 throughout the entire disease course, this type is defined as persistent oligoarthritis. Oligoarthritis usually begins under the age of 6 and is predominantly observed in girls. With timely and properly selected treatment, the joint prognosis is often favorable, especially if isolated joints are involved. However, if new joints become involved and polyarthritis develops, the prognosis often varies widely. A significant proportion of patients may develop serious ocular complications, such as inflammation of the anterior segment of the eyeball (anterior uveitis), the vascular-rich membrane covering the eye. Because the anterior part of the vascular tunic of the eye consists of the iris and ciliary body, this complication is referred to as either chronic iridocyclitis or chronic anterior uveitis. In JIA, this pathology develops insidiously without causing any obvious symptoms (such as eye pain or redness). If unrecognized and untreated, anterior uveitis progresses and can lead to very severe eye damage. Therefore, early recognition of this manifestation is extremely critical. Because the eye does not become red and the child does not complain of vision deterioration, parents or attending physicians may miss anterior uveitis. Risk factors for uveitis include early JIA onset and a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test result. For children at high risk of developing uveitis, regular ophthalmological examinations using a specialized device called a slit lamp are extremely important. The frequency of ophthalmological examinations is typically once every 3 months for a prolonged period.
2.2 What causes chronic iridocyclitis? Is there a relationship between iridocyclitis and arthritis?
Eye inflammation (iridocyclitis) is caused by an abnormal immune reaction (autoimmune) directed against the eye. However, the exact mechanisms of this pathology are unknown. This complication is observed mainly in patients with early-onset JIA who have a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) test result. The reasons why ocular involvement develops in joint disease are unknown. However, it is important to remember that arthritis and iridocyclitis can have independent courses; therefore, periodic slit-lamp examinations are necessary even if the arthritis is in remission, since eye inflammation can recur without symptoms and even when arthritis is improving. The course of iridocyclitis is characterized by periodic flares that also occur independently of arthritis exacerbations. Usually, iridocyclitis develops after the manifestation of arthritis or may be detected simultaneously with it. Much less frequently, it precedes arthritis. Typically, such situations are the most unfavorable: because the disease is asymptomatic, delayed diagnosis can lead to visual impairment.
3. Diagnosis and treatment
What laboratory tests are required?
At the time of diagnosis, to more accurately determine the JIA variant and to identify patients at risk for specific complications such as chronic iridocyclitis, laboratory and instrumental examinations are performed in combination with joint assessments and an ophthalmologist consultation. Determining the rheumatoid factor (RF) content in the blood is a laboratory test that detects autoantibodies. A positive result and high concentrations of RF indicate the JIA subtype.
Other tests are also performed: erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP), which determine the severity of overall inflammation. However, the diagnosis and treatment prescription are based much more on clinical manifestations than on laboratory parameters. Depending on the treatment used, patients may require periodic tests (such as a complete blood count, general clinical blood chemistry) to detect adverse reactions and determine the degree of potential drug toxicity, which may be asymptomatic. Joint inflammation is assessed primarily through clinical examination, sometimes using imaging techniques such as joint ultrasound. Periodic X-rays or contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of joints (a single joint) allow assessment of bone status and bone growth, which may serve as a basis for treatment adjustment.
How can we treat this?
There is no specific therapy for JIA. The goal of treatment is to relieve pain, fatigue, and stiffness, prevent joint and bone destruction, minimize deformities, and improve joint mobility while preserving the child's growth and development. Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in the treatment of JIA using medications known as biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. However, some children exhibit "treatment resistance." This means that despite treatment, disease activity does not decrease, and joint inflammation does not resolve. While there are certain general principles for treatment planning, therapy must be individualized for each child. Parent involvement in treatment decision-making is very important.
Treatment is generally based on medications that suppress systemic and/or articular inflammation, as well as rehabilitation procedures that help preserve joint function and prevent the development of deformities. Treatment is comprehensive and requires the collaboration of a team of specialists (rheumatologist, pediatric orthopedist, physical therapist, ophthalmologist).
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (NSAIDs) (ATX Code M01A)
NSAIDs traditionally remain the mainstay of treatment for all forms of JIA and other pediatric rheumatic diseases. These are agents for symptomatic anti-inflammatory and antipyretic (temperature-lowering) treatment; "symptomatic" means they are not capable of inducing disease remission, but merely relieve symptoms associated with inflammation. The most commonly used drugs are diclofenac**, nimesulide, meloxicam, and ibuprofen**. NSAIDs are usually well tolerated by children: stomach discomfort, the most common side effect in adults, is less common in children. Sometimes one NSAID may be effective when another is insufficiently effective. Combining different NSAIDs is not indicated. The optimal effect on joint inflammation is observed a few weeks after the start of treatment.
Intra-articular glucocorticoid injections (ATC code H02AB)
Intra-articular injections are used when there is one or more joints with pronounced inflammation that significantly limits normal joint movement and/or is accompanied by severe joint pain. A prolonged-acting (long-acting) glucocorticoid is injected into the joint. In the Russian Federation, preference is given to #betamethasone**—a drug that acts for a long time (often for many months). Its absorption into the systemic circulation is minimal. This drug is used only as an adjunctive treatment for JIA. It can be used multiple times to treat the same joint. An intra-articular injection can be performed under local anesthesia or general anesthesia (usually at a younger age), depending on the child's age, the type of joint, and the number of joints being injected. As a rule, it is recommended to perform no more than 3–4 injections per year into the same joint.
Second-line drugs
Second-line drugs are indicated for children whose polyarthritis progresses despite adequate treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (NSAIDs) (ATC code M01A) and glucocorticoid injections (ATC code H02AB). Second-line drugs are mainly added to prior NSAID therapy, which is usually continued. The full effect of most second-line drugs becomes apparent only after several weeks or months of treatment.
#Methotrexate** (ATX Code L04AX03)
Undoubtedly, among second-line drugs used for the treatment of children with JIA, #methotrexate** (ATC code L04AX03) is preferred worldwide. Several studies have proven its efficacy and investigated its safety profile over several years of use. The maximum effective dose is currently defined in the medical literature as 15 mg/m2 of body surface area. It is administered either orally or parenterally (usually via subcutaneous injections). #Methotrexate** (ATC code L04AX03) is used in children with active arthritis in combination with other drugs, including biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) (ATC codes L04AB, L01XC, L04AC). #Methotrexate** (ATC code L04AX03) is generally well tolerated by children. The most common side effects are gastrointestinal intolerance and elevated blood levels of hepatic transaminases. Due to the potential toxicity of the drug, laboratory parameters must be monitored periodically during treatment. Currently, #methotrexate** is registered for the treatment of JIA in many countries worldwide. Combination therapy with #methotrexate** (ATC code L04AX03) and folic acid**—a vitamin that reduces the risk of side effects, especially regarding liver function—is also recommended.
#Leflunomide** is an alternative to #methotrexate**, particularly for treating children who do not tolerate #methotrexate**. #Leflunomide** is administered in tablet form. This type of therapy has been evaluated in studies involving JIA patients, and its efficacy has been proven. However, this treatment is more expensive than methotrexate.
Glucocorticoids (ATC code: H02AB)
Glucocorticoids (ATC code H02AB) are the most effective available anti-inflammatory drugs, but their use is limited by the fact that their long-term administration is accompanied by a number of serious adverse events, including osteoporosis and growth retardation. Nevertheless, the advantage of glucocorticoids (ATC code H02AB) is that they can be used to treat systemic symptoms that do not respond to other treatments, in life-threatening systemic complications, and as "bridge" therapy during the acute period of the disease and while waiting for second-line drugs to take effect.
Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (ATC codes: L04AB – tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors, L01XC – monoclonal antibodies, L04AC – interleukin inhibitors)
Over the past few years, new prospects have opened up for the use of drugs known as bDMARDs (ATC codes L04AB, L01XC, L04AC). Doctors use this term to refer to bioengineered medications whose action, unlike #methotrexate** or other immunosuppressants, is targeted primarily against specific molecules (tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-1, interleukin-6, or T-lymphocyte-stimulating molecules). Biologic agents have been shown to be potent means of blocking the inflammatory process characteristic of JIA. Currently, a number of bDMARDs are available, and almost all of them are approved for the treatment of JIA.
TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB)
TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB) are drugs that selectively block TNF, an important mediator of the inflammatory process. They are used alone or in combination with methotrexate** and are effective in the majority of patients with active arthritis. Their effect is achieved quite rapidly, and they have now been shown to have a good safety profile, at least over several years of treatment. However, longer-term follow-up is necessary to establish potential long-term side effects. TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB) are the most widely used drugs for the treatment of JIA. There are several types of TNF-alpha blockers, which vary significantly in their method and frequency of administration. For example, etanercept** is administered subcutaneously once or twice a week, adalimumab** subcutaneously once every 2 weeks, and golimumab** subcutaneously once a month. Other drugs in this class are still undergoing clinical trials (e.g., certolizumab pegol**) for use in children. There are also drugs undergoing clinical trials in adult patient studies that may become available for children in the future. TNF-alpha inhibitors (L04AB) are used alone or in combination with methotrexate. Like other second-line drugs, they must be used under strict medical supervision.
T-cell co-stimulation blocker (abatacept** (ATC code L04AA24)
Abatacept** has a unique mechanism of action targeting specific white blood cells called T lymphocytes. Currently, it can be used to treat children with polyarthritis in whom treatment with methotrexate** or other bDMARDs has failed.
Interleukin-6 inhibitor (tocilizumab** (ATC code L04AA))
This medication is particularly effective for the treatment of sJIA. Tocilizumab** is also approved in the Russian Federation for the treatment of articular forms of JIA. It is administered via intravenous infusions once every 4 weeks. It is used in cases of treatment failure with methotrexate** or other bDMARDs.
Other Complementary Treatments
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation is an important component of treatment. It includes appropriate exercises and, when indicated, the use of splints to hold joints in a comfortable position to prevent pain, stiffness, muscle contractures, and joint deformities. Rehabilitation should begin early and be performed routinely to improve or maintain joint and muscle function.
Orthopedic surgery
The main indications for orthopedic surgery are the need for joint replacement (primarily hip or knee arthroplasty in cases of joint destruction) and soft tissue surgical release for persistent contractures.
What about complementary or alternative therapies?
There are many complementary and alternative therapies available, which can be confusing for patients and their families. Carefully weigh the risks and benefits of such treatments, as their efficacy is unproven and they can be costly in terms of time, burden on the child, and financial expense. If you wish to explore complementary and alternative treatment options, please discuss these choices with your pediatric rheumatologist. Some treatments may interact with conventional medications. Most doctors will not object to alternative therapies as long as you follow medical recommendations. It is crucial not to stop taking prescribed medications. When drugs such as GCs (ATC code H02AB) are necessary to keep the disease under control, discontinuing them can be extremely dangerous if the disease is still in an active phase. Please discuss any concerns you have regarding the prescribed medication with your child's physician.
When should treatment be initiated?
Currently, there are international and national recommendations to help doctors and families choose treatment. International recommendations have recently been published by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR, see www.rheumatology.org), and another set of recommendations is currently in preparation by the Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PRES, see www.pres.org.uk).
What is the current legislation regarding the use of approved and off-label emerging potential treatments for children?
15 years ago, all drugs used to treat juvenile arthritis and many other childhood diseases had not been properly studied for use in children. This meant that doctors prescribed medications based on personal experience or on studies conducted with adult patients. Indeed, in the past, conducting clinical trials in pediatric rheumatology was difficult, mainly due to the lack of funding for studies involving children and insufficient interest from pharmaceutical companies, as the pediatric market is small and research costs do not pay off. The situation changed dramatically several years ago. This was driven by the passage of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act in the USA and specific legislation for the development of medicines for children (the Pediatric Regulation) in the European Union (EU). These initiatives essentially force pharmaceutical companies to conduct drug trials involving children as well. The US and EU initiatives, along with the existence of 2 major networks: the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO – www.printo.it), which unites more than 50 countries worldwide, and the Paediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG – www.prcsg.org), based in North America, have had a very positive impact on the development of pediatric rheumatology, in particular on the development of new treatments for children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). The Russian Federation is an active participant in almost all clinical trials of biological drugs in children. Sometimes research requires the use of a placebo (pills or infusions without the active substance) to ensure that the drug under study brings more benefit than harm. Thanks to this important research, several drugs have been registered to date, particularly for the treatment of juvenile arthritis. This means that regulatory agencies such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and several national authorities have reviewed the scientific information resulting from clinical trials and allowed pharmaceutical companies to state on the drug label that it is effective and safe for children. The list of drugs specifically approved for the treatment of juvenile arthritis includes methotrexate** (L01BA), etanercept** (L04AB), adalimumab** (L04AB), golimumab** (L04AB), abatacept** (L04AA24), tocilizumab** (L04AC), tofacitinib** (L04AA), secukinumab** (L04AC10). Currently, several other drugs are being investigated for children, so your child's doctor may invite you to participate in such studies. There are other drugs that are not formally approved for use in juvenile arthritis. These drugs may be used even without an approved indication (so-called off-label use), and your the doctor may suggest their use, especially if no other treatments are available.
What are the main side effects of treatment?
Medications used in the treatment of JIA are generally well tolerated. Gastric intolerance—the most common side effect of NSAIDs (ATC code M01A) (which is precisely why they should be taken with food)—is observed less frequently in children than in adults. NSAIDs (ATC code M01A) may cause an elevation in certain liver enzymes in the blood, but this is a rare occurrence. Methotrexate** (ATC code L04AX03) is also well tolerated. Gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea and vomiting are common. To monitor potential toxicity, it is important to check liver enzyme levels through routine blood tests. The most frequent laboratory abnormality is an increase in liver enzyme activity, which normalizes upon discontinuation or dose reduction of methotrexate** (ATC code L04AX03). The use of folinic acid or folic acid** (B03BB) helps reduce the incidence of hepatotoxicity. Hypersensitivity reactions to methotrexate** (ATC code L04AX03) are rare. Long-term use of high-dose GCs (ATC code H02AB) is associated with several significant side effects. These include growth retardation and osteoporosis. High doses of GCs (ATC code H02AB) cause a marked increase in appetite, which in turn can lead to obesity. Therefore, it is important to encourage children to eat foods that satisfy their appetite without increasing calorie intake.
bDMARDs (ATC codes L04AB, L01XC, L04AC) are generally well tolerated, at least during the first years of treatment. Patients must be closely monitored for the potential development of infections or other adverse events. Nevertheless, it is important to understand that the experience with drugs used to treat JIA is limited both quantitatively (only a few hundred children participated in clinical trials) and temporally (biological agents have only been available since 2000). For these reasons, several JIA registries currently exist to monitor children treated with biological therapies at the national level (e.g., in Germany, the UK, the USA, etc.) and international level (e.g., Pharmachild, a project implemented by the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) and the Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PRES)). Their goal is to carefully monitor children with JIA and identify any potential long-term safety issues (several years after drug administration). The Russian Federation also maintains a Registry of Children with Systemic JIA, aimed at monitoring the clinical features of the disease, the quality of medical care provided, and the efficacy and safety of antirheumatic drugs, including biological agents.
How long should treatment be continued?
Treatment should continue as long as the disease is active. The duration of the disease is unpredictable; in most cases, after treatment lasting from several to many years, spontaneous remission occurs of JIA. The course of JIA is often characterized by periodic remissions and flares that require significant changes in treatment. The issue of complete discontinuation of therapy is considered only after the arthritis has been quiescent for a prolonged period (2 years or more). However, clear data on the possibility of disease relapse after medication cessation are lacking. Physicians usually continue to monitor children with JIA until they reach adulthood, even if the arthritis subsides.
Eye examination (slit-lamp examination): how often should it be performed and for how long?
In at-risk patients (especially in the case of a positive ANA), a slit-lamp examination must be performed at least once every 3 months. If iridocyclitis develops, patients need to be examined more frequently; the frequency of examinations depends on the severity of eye involvement determined during the ophthalmological examination.
The risk of developing iridocyclitis decreases over time; however, it can develop many years after the onset of arthritis. Therefore, it is advisable to check the eyes for many years, even if the arthritis is in remission.
Acute uveitis, which can develop in patients with arthritis and enthesitis, presents with clinical manifestations (eye redness, eye pain, and discomfort when exposed to light – photophobia). If such complaints are present, an urgent appointment (examination, consultation) with an ophthalmologist is required. Unlike iridocyclitis, early diagnosis does not require periodic slit-lamp examinations.
What is the long-term prognosis of arthritis?
The prognosis of arthritis has improved significantly over the years, but it still depends on the severity and clinical subtype of JIA, as well as the timeliness and adequacy of treatment. Research is continuously ongoing to develop new drugs and bDMARDs (ATC code L04AB, L01XC, L04AC), as well as to make treatment accessible to all children. The prognosis of arthritis has improved significantly over the past decade. Overall, it is noted that approximately 40% of children will not require medication and will remain free of disease symptoms (remission) within 8–10 years of disease onset.
The highest rates of remission are observed in the oligoarticular and systemic variants of the disease.
RF-positive polyarticular JIA is most commonly characterized by a progressive course of arthritis, which can lead to severe joint damage. This form is the pediatric counterpart of RF-positive rheumatoid arthritis in adults.
RF-negative polyarticular JIA has a complex nature in terms of both clinical manifestations and prognosis. However, the overall prognosis is much better than that of RF-positive polyarticular JIA; joint destruction develops in only about a quarter of patients.
Oligoarticular JIA often has a good articular prognosis when the disease is limited to involvement of a few joints (so-called persistent oligoarthritis). In patients whose disease progresses with the gradual involvement of several joints (extended oligoarthritis), the prognosis is similar to that for patients with polyarticular RF-negative JIA.
Currently, there are no reliable clinical and laboratory characteristics available for patients in the early stages of the disease, and physicians cannot predict which patients will have the most unfavorable prognosis. Such prognostic indicators would be of significant clinical interest as they would allow the identification of patients who require more aggressive treatment from the onset of the disease. A number of laboratory markers are currently under study, which are expected to help determine the optimal time to discontinue treatment with methotrexate or biological agents.
What about iridocyclitis?
Iridocyclitis, if left untreated, can have very serious consequences, including problems such as clouding of the eye lenses (cataracts) and blindness. However, if treatment for iridocyclitis is initiated early, these symptoms usually subside with therapy that includes eye drops designed to reduce inflammation and dilate the pupils. If symptoms cannot be controlled with eye drops, treatment with biological agents may be prescribed. However, due to variable responses to treatment among different children, clear data to recommend the best treatment for severe iridocyclitis are not yet available. Therefore, early diagnosis is a decisive factor for the prognosis. Cataracts can also be a consequence of long-term corticosteroid treatment, especially in patients with systemic JIA.
4. Everyday life
Can diet affect the course of the disease?
There is no evidence that diet can influence the disease. In general, the child should follow a balanced diet appropriate for their age. Patients taking GCs (ATC code H02AB) need to avoid overeating, as these drugs increase appetite. In addition, foods high in calories and sodium should be avoided during GC treatment (ATC code H02AB), even if the dose is low.
Can climate affect the course of the disease?
There is no evidence that climate can influence disease manifestations. Nevertheless, climate changes, especially intense sun exposure, acute respiratory, intestinal, and other infections that children frequently contract in hot climates, may trigger a disease flare. In cold weather, morning stiffness may last longer.
What can physical activity and exercise therapy achieve?
The goal of physical activity and therapeutic exercise is to ensure that the child can optimally participate in all daily activities and fulfill all necessary social roles. In addition, physical activity and therapeutic exercise can be used to motivate children toward an active, healthy lifestyle. A prerequisite for achieving these goals is healthy joints and muscles. Physical activity and therapeutic exercise can be used to improve joint mobility, stabilize joints, increase muscle flexibility, muscle strength, coordination, and endurance (vitality). These aspects of a healthy musculoskeletal system enable the child to successfully and safely participate in school and extracurricular activities, such as active recreation and sports. Treatment and a home exercise program can be useful for achieving the required level of strength and endurance.
Are sports allowed?
Team sports are an important aspect of a healthy child's everyday life. One of the main goals of JIA treatment is to enable children to lead as normal a lifestyle as possible and to consider themselves no different from their peers. Preference should be given to sports where mechanical stress on the joints is absent or minimal, such as swimming or cycling.
Can the child regularly attend school?
It is crucial that the child attends school regularly. Limited mobility can be a barrier to school attendance; it can cause walking difficulties, rapid fatigue, pain, or stiffness. During the acute phase of the disease, home schooling is preferable. In remission, the child can attend school like their healthy peers. Physical education and participation in sports activities are recommended taking into account mobility limitations caused by disease activity. School for children is as important as work for adults—it is where a child learns to become an independent, productive, and self-sufficient individual. Parents and teachers must do everything possible to encourage sick children to participate in school activities as usual, so that they succeed academically, are able to communicate with peers and adults, and are accepted and valued by friends.
Is vaccination permitted?
If the patient is undergoing immunosuppressive therapy (GCs [ATC code H02AB], methotrexate**, bDMARDs [ATC code L04AB, L01XC, L04AC]), vaccination with live attenuated microorganisms is not recommended due to the potential risk of infection spread resulting from lowered immune defense. Vaccines that do not contain live microorganisms, but only pathogenic proteins, are administered according to an individual schedule, under strict indications following an appointment (examination, consultation) with a rheumatologist.
Will the child have a normal adult life?
This is the main goal of treatment, and in most cases, this is what happens. JIA therapy has indeed improved radically, and with new drugs, it will become even better in the future. Currently, the combined use of pharmacological treatment and rehabilitation makes it possible to prevent joint destruction in the majority of patients. Close attention should also be paid to the psychological impact of the disease on the child and their family. Chronic diseases, including JIA, take a heavy toll on the entire family, and of course, the more severe the disease, the harder it is to cope with. It will be difficult for the child to cope with their illness properly if the parents do not. Parents have a strong attachment to their child, and to prevent potential problems, they tend to overprotect them. A positive attitude from parents who support the child and encourage them to be as independent as possible despite the illness will be an invaluable help for the child in overcoming the challenges associated with the disease, enabling them to cope on an equal footing with their peers and develop into an independent, well-balanced individual. The pediatric rheumatology team should provide psychosocial support to patients when needed. Family support groups and charitable organizations can also help families cope with the disease.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. Evaluation of Therapy Efficacy
Russian title: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire
Original title (if available): Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ)
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Kuzmina, N. N., Nikishina, I. P., Shaykov, A. V., Ruperta, N., Shelepina, T. A., & Salugina, S. O. (2002). Russian adapted version of questionnaires for assessing the quality of life and health status of children with juvenile chronic arthritis. Scientific and Practical Rheumatology, (1), 40-44.
Type (underline): - questionnaire
Purpose: assessment of the degree of functional impairment
Content (template):
Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In this section, we want to obtain information on how your child's illness affects their ability to cope with daily life. You may write any comments on the back of this page. When answering the questions, you should check the one response that best reflects the child's physical abilities (average condition throughout the day) OVER THE PAST WEEK. CONSIDER ONLY THOSE PROBLEMS THAT ARE CAUSED BY THE ILLNESS. If the child is unable to perform any function due to age, use the term "Not applicable". For example, if your child has difficulty performing certain functions or cannot perform them at all due to age, but this is not related to their illness, use the term "NOT applicable". | ||||||||||
Without difficulty | With some difficulty | With much difficulty | Unable to do | Not applicable | ||||||
1. DRESSING AND GROOMING | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Dress, including tying shoelaces and buttoning up? | | | | | | |||||
- Shampoo hair? | | | | | | |||||
- Take off socks? | | | | | | |||||
- Cut toenails? | | | | | | |||||
2. ARISING | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Stand up from a low armchair or the floor? | | | | | | |||||
- Get in and out of bed or get up from a crib? | | | | | | |||||
3. EATING | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Cut a piece of meat? | | | | | | |||||
- Lift a cup or glass to the mouth? | | | | | | |||||
- Open a new cereal box? | | | | | | |||||
4. WALKING | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Walk outdoors on flat ground? | | | | | | |||||
- Climb 5 steps? | | | | | | |||||
Indicate what DEVICES AND AIDS your child uses when performing the specified functions: | ||||||||||
- Cane | | - Dressing aids (button hook, zipper pull, long-handled shoehorn, etc.) | | |||||||
- Walker | | - Built-up or special pencil | | |||||||
- Crutches | | - Special or raised chair | | |||||||
- Wheelchair | | - Other (Please specify)________________________) | | |||||||
Indicate which daily activities of the child require additional assistance from others DUE TO THE ILLNESS: | ||||||||||
- Dressing and Grooming | | - Eating | | |||||||
- Arising | | - Walking | | |||||||
Without difficulty | With some difficulty | With much difficulty | Unable to do | Not applicable | ||||||
5. HYGIENE | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Wash and dry entire body? | | | | | | |||||
- Get in and out of the tub? | | | | | | |||||
- Sit down and get up from the toilet or potty? | | | | | | |||||
- Brush teeth? | | | | | | |||||
- Comb hair? | | | | | | |||||
6. REACH | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | | | | | | |||||
- Reach and get down a heavy object from head level (large toy, books)? | | | | | | |||||
- Bend down and pick up clothing or a piece of paper from the floor? | | | | | | |||||
- Put on a sweater over the head? | | | | | | |||||
- Turn neck to look back? | | | | | | |||||
7. GRIPPING | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Write with a pen/pencil? | | | | | | |||||
- Open a car door? | | | | | | |||||
- Open a previously opened jar? | | | | | | |||||
- Open and close a water faucet? | | | | | | |||||
- Open a door after turning the doorknob? | | | | | | |||||
8. ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Run errands outside the home, go shopping? | | | | | | |||||
- Get in and out of a car, a child car seat, a school bus? | | | | | | |||||
- Ride a bicycle? | | | | | | |||||
- Do household chores (wash dishes, take out the trash, vacuum, do yard work, make the bed and tidy the room)? | | | | | | |||||
- Run and play? | | | | | | |||||
Indicate the DEVICES required by the child when performing the following functions: | ||||||||||
- Raised toilet seat | | - Special bathroom grab bar | | |||||||
- Special bath seat | | - Long-handled devices to reach things? | | |||||||
- Can opener (if the jar is already open) | | - Long-handled bathing sponge/brush? | | |||||||
Indicate the daily activities in which the child NEEDS additional help from others DUE TO ILLNESS: | ||||||||||
- Hygiene | | - Gripping and opening objects | | |||||||
- Reaching for items | | - Running errands and housework | | |||||||
9. PAIN: In addition, we would like to clarify whether your child's illness is accompanied by pain or not? If "YES", rate the pain your child has experienced OVER THE PAST WEEK? Rate your child's pain by marking it on a special line | ||||||||||
No pain 0 100 Very severe pain | ||||||||||
FINAL ASSESSMENT: Taking into account all the negative aspects of the disease, give an overall assessment of your child's health status by marking it on the special line: Very good 0 ______________________________________________________________________ 100 Very poor | ||||||||||
1990 Original version Singh G et al. 1999 Cross-cultural adapted version Kuzmina N, Shaikov A et al for PRINTO
Key (interpretation):
The result is the calculated score (0-3):
0–0.13 – minimal functional impairment
0.14–0.63 – minimal to moderate functional impairment
0.64–1.6 – moderate functional impairment
>1.6 – severe functional disability
Notes: none
Appendix G2. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Russian title: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Original title (if available): Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain)
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Hawker G.A., Mian S., Kendzerska T., French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63(Suppl 11): S240–52
Type (underline): rating scale
Purpose: assessment of the degree of functional impairment
Content (template), The patient's condition is assessed based on the patient's or parents' subjective assessment of the patient's status and disease activity, as well as the physician's assessment.
The following are performed:
a) global health assessment based on the patient's or parents' subjective evaluation using a 100 mm VAS in points.
A score of "0" corresponds to very good health, and "100" points to very poor health. The child or parent marks a point on the line corresponding to their perceived health state. The distance between the selected point and "0" is then measured using a ruler.
b) physician's global assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm VAS (scores), where "0" indicates no activity and "100" indicates the highest disease activity.
The physician marks a point on the line corresponding to their perceived health state. The distance between the selected point and "0" is then measured using a ruler.
Key (interpretation): The resulting score is measured in mm (points) from 0 to 100.
Notes: none
Appendix G3. American College of Rheumatology Disease Activity Criteria (ACR, 2011)
Russian title: American College of Rheumatology (ACR, 2011) criteria for clinical inactive disease
Original title (if applicable): Criteria for clinical inactive disease (CID)
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Wallace C. A. et al. American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria for defining clinical inactive disease in select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis //Arthritis care & research. – 2011. – Vol. 63. – No. 7. – P. 929-936.
Type (underline): - other
Purpose: assessment of disease activity
Content (template), key (interpretation):
Systemic juvenile arthritis with active systemic manifestations and varying degrees of joint activity:
• Low activity (all criteria present):
– number of active joints ≤ 4;
– ESR or CRP within normal limits;
– physician global assessment of disease activity by VAS < 4 out of 10 points;
– patient or parent global assessment by VAS < 2 out of 10 points.
• Moderate activity (criteria do not meet low or high activity):
– presence of > 1 low-activity criterion and < 3 high-activity criteria.
• High activity (presence of ≥ 3 criteria):
– number of active joints > 8;
– ESR or CRP exceeding the upper limit of normal by 2-fold;
– physician global assessment of disease activity by VAS ≥ 7 out of 10 points;
– patient or parent global assessment of well-being by VAS ≥ 5 out of 10 points.
Criteria for evaluating the efficacy of antirheumatic therapy in patients with sJIA
Therapy efficacy is evaluated according to the American College of Rheumatology pediatric criteria (ACRpedi) and the criteria for inactive disease/remission stage C. Wallace et al., 2011:
To evaluate the response using ACRpedi criteria, the following parameters are used:
number of joints with signs of active inflammation;
number of joints with limitation of motion;
ESR or serum CRP concentration;
physician's global assessment of disease activity (using a 100-mm VAS);
patient's or parent's assessment of overall well-being (using a VAS);
functional ability assessment using the CHAQ questionnaire.
ACRpedi 30, 50, and 70 improvement scores are defined as improvement of at least 30%, 50%, or 70%, respectively, in at least 3 of the 6 core set parameters, with no more than 1 parameter worsening by more than 30%.
Treatment failure is defined as the absence of a 30% improvement according to the ACR pediatric criteria within 3 months.
Criteria for inactive disease/remission stage (C. Wallace et al., 2011)
absence of active arthritis in any joint;
absence of fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to juvenile arthritis;
absence of active uveitis;
normal ESR and/or CRP levels;
absence of disease activity based on the physician's global assessment (VAS);
morning stiffness lasting less than 15 minutes.
To establish the absence of disease activity (inactive disease state), the patient must meet all of the listed criteria.
Pharmacologic clinical remission is established if the disease remains in an inactive state while on continuous drug therapy for 6 consecutive months.
Non-pharmacologic clinical remission is established if the disease remains in an inactive state for 12 consecutive months without antirheumatic drugs.
The "Remission duration" indicator is expressed in months elapsed since the onset of the inactive phase of the disease.
Notes: none
Appendix G4. Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 71 joints (JADAS71)
Russian title: Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 71 joints Original title (if applicable): Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS71)
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Consolaro A. et al. Development and validation of a composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis //Arthritis Care & Research: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology. – 2009. – Vol. 61. – No. 5. – P. 658-666.
Type (underline): - index
Purpose: assessment of disease activity
Content (template): number of joints with active arthritis;
physician's global assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm VAS; 0 = minimum activity, 10 cm = maximum activity, cm equated to points;
parent's/patient's global assessment of health status using a 100 mm VAS; 0 = very good health, 10 cm = very poor health, cm equated to points;
erythrocyte sedimentation rate. To construct the scale from 0 to 10, the formula was used: (ESR - 20)/10. A value of less than 20 mm/h is scored as 0, and greater than 120 mm/h is scored as 10.
Key (interpretation):
The final JADAS71 index is calculated as the sum of all components (0–101).
Inactive disease state corresponds to a JADAS71 index < 1 point.
Notes: none