List of Abbreviations
ACR – American College of Rheumatology
ACR pedi – American College of Rheumatology Pediatric Criteria
ALT – Alanine aminotransferase
ANA – Antinuclear antibody
ANCA – Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies
AST – Aspartate aminotransferase
ACPA – Antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide
VAS – Visual Analog Scale
IBD – Inflammatory bowel disease
IVIG – Normal human immunoglobulin (ATC code: J06BA – normal human immunoglobulins)
bDMARDs – Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (ATC codes: L01XC – monoclonal antibodies, L04AC – interleukin inhibitors)
GC – Glucocorticoids (ATC code: H02AB)
GGT – Gamma-glutamyl transferase
HPS – Hemophagocytic syndrome
DNA – Deoxyribonucleic acid
GI – Gastrointestinal tract
IL – Interleukin
CT – Computed tomography
CK – Creatine kinase
LDH – Lactate dehydrogenase
PT – Physiotherapy
ICD – International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems
MRI – Magnetic resonance imaging
NSAIDs – Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (ATC code M01A)
AKI – Acute kidney injury
ARI – Acute respiratory infection
PET – Positron emission tomography
RDS – Respiratory distress syndrome
RF – Rheumatoid factor
RP – Radiopharmaceutical (ATC code V09: Diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals, V10: Therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals)
ESR – Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
CRP – C-reactive protein
MPS – Mononuclear phagocyte system
sJIA – Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis
sJIA – Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (systemic-onset juvenile arthritis)
LER – Level of evidence of recommendations
Ultrasound – Ultrasound examination
Grade of Recommendation (GoR) – level of recommendation persuasiveness
FC – Functional class
TNF – Tumor necrosis factor
CMV – Cytomegalovirus
ALP – Alkaline phosphatase
EGD – Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
ECG – Electrocardiography
EchoCG – Echocardiography
JA – Juvenile arthritis
CINCA – Chronic infantile neurologic, cutaneous and articular syndrome
FCAS – Familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome
FMF – Familial Mediterranean fever
HLA-B27 – Human leukocyte antigen B27
Ig G, M, A – Immunoglobulin G, M, A
ILAR – International League of Associations for Rheumatology
MKD – Mevalonate kinase deficiency
MWS – Muckle-Wells syndrome
PAPA – PAPA syndrome (Pyogenic sterile arthritis, pyoderma gangrenosum, and acne)
Per os – By mouth, orally
Scl-70 – Non-histone chromosomal protein Scl-70, which is the enzyme topoisomerase I with a molecular weight of 70 kDa
Th – T helper lymphocytes
TRAPS – Tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome
Clarification of notes
…** – medication included in the List of Vital and Essential Drugs for medical use;
…# – "information on the method of administration, dose, and duration of use of the medicinal product, including references to clinical trials of the efficacy and safety of the applied dosing regimen for the given disease, or references to relevant literature sources if the recommendation thesis refers to a medicinal product used for medical application off-label (not in accordance with the indications for use, contraindications, methods of administration, and doses contained in the instructions for medical use)".
Terms and Definitions
Juvenile [Lat. Juvenīlis – young, youthful] – characteristic of youth; young, adolescent.
Idiopathic [idiopathicus; idio- + Greek pathos suffering, disease] – arising without apparent causes, characterized by unclear origin.
Interleukins (IL) – a group of cytokines that mediate the activation and interaction of immunocompetent cells in the immune response and regulate myelopoiesis and erythropoiesis.
Antinuclear factor (ANF) – autoantibodies directed against soluble components of the cell nucleus (ribonucleoproteins), forming a whole family (over 200 varieties) of antinuclear antibodies (ANA).
Rheumatoid factor (RF) – autoantibodies that react as an autoantigen with the subject's own immunoglobulins G modified under the influence of an agent (e.g., a virus)
Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA, Eng. – ANCA) – autoantibodies to components of the neutrophil cytoplasm. Found in so-called ANCA-associated diseases, including ANCA-associated vasculitis.
Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-CCP, synonyms – anti-CCP antibodies, anti-CCP, CCP antibodies) – a heterogeneous group of IgG autoantibodies that recognize antigenic determinants of filaggrin and other proteins containing the atypical amino acid citrulline.
Anti-Scl-70 antibodies – anti-scleroderma antibodies to the non-histone chromosomal protein Scl-70, which is the enzyme topoisomerase I with a molecular weight of 70 kDa, antibodies to topoisomerase I.
HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigens) – human leukocyte antigens, or the human tissue compatibility system – a group of histocompatibility antigens, the major histocompatibility complex in humans.
Class I major histocompatibility complex molecules (A, B, C) – present peptides from the cytoplasm on the cell surface (including viral peptides, if present). These peptides are fragments of proteins degraded in proteasomes. The peptide length averages about 9 amino acids. Foreign antigens attract killer T cells (also called CD8-positive or cytotoxic T cells), which destroy the antigen-bearing cell. Molecules of this class are present on the surface of all cell types except erythrocytes and trophoblast cells.
Class II major histocompatibility complex molecules (DP, DM, DOA, DOB, DQ, DR) – present antigens from the extracellular space to T lymphocytes. Some antigens stimulate the division of T helpers, which then stimulate B cells to produce antibodies against this antigen. Molecules of this class are located on the surface of antigen-presenting cells: dendritic cells, macrophages, B lymphocytes. Class III major histocompatibility complex molecules encode components of the complement system and blood proteins.
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) – a chronic inflammatory disease from the group of spondyloarthritides, characterized by obligatory involvement of the sacroiliac joints and/or spine with potential progression to ankylosis, with frequent involvement of entheses and peripheral joints in the pathological process
Uveitis – an inflammatory disease of the middle coat of the eye (uvea).
Anterior uveitis (iridocyclitis) is an inflammatory lesion of the anterior segments of the uveal tract.
Enthesitis is inflammation of the entheses, the specific sites where tendons and ligaments attach to bone.
Reiter's syndrome is a disease characterized by inflammatory lesions of the urogenital tract, joints, and eyes. Reiter's syndrome belongs to the group of reactive arthritides—non-suppurative "sterile" inflammatory diseases of the musculoskeletal system triggered by an extra-articular infection, primarily of the urogenital or intestinal tract.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (ATC Code M01A) – a group of medicinal products possessing analgesic, antipyretic, and anti-inflammatory effects. They are subdivided into selective (s-NSAIDs) and nonselective (ns-NSAIDs) cyclooxygenase enzyme inhibitors.
Biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (ATC Code L01XC – monoclonal antibodies, L04AC – interleukin inhibitors, L04AB – tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors) – a group of medicinal products of biological origin, including monoclonal antibodies (chimeric, humanized, fully human) and recombinant proteins (usually including human IgG Fc fragments) obtained using genetic engineering methods, characterized by a selective effect on specific mechanisms of chronic inflammation development, specifically suppressing the immuno-inflammatory process and slowing down the progression of joint destruction.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Systemic-onset juvenile arthritis (syn.: systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, sJIA; systemic juvenile arthritis, sJA) is arthritis of one or more joints accompanied by (or preceded by) confirmed intermittent fever lasting at least 3 days for a minimum of 2 weeks in combination with one or more of the following signs:
- short-lived (evanescent) erythematous rash;
- generalized lymphadenopathy;
- hepatomegaly and (or) splenomegaly;
- serositis (pericarditis, and (or) pleuritis, and (or) peritonitis) [1–3].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a multifactorial disease with unknown etiology and immunoaggressive pathogenesis [1,4,5].
At an early stage, the central link in the pathogenesis of sJIA is the activation of the innate immune system. The primary antigen is unknown; it may be viral, bacterial, or a stress signal. Recognition and interaction of PAMPs (pathogen-associated molecular patterns) and DAMPs (damage-associated molecular patterns), such as ATP, nucleic acids, etc., as well as S100 proteins with membrane Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) of myeloid cells leads to the activation of the transcription factor NF-kB, its translocation into the cell nucleus followed by the activation of a large number of genes encoding the production of antimicrobial peptides, pro-inflammatory cytokines, stress proteins, and co-stimulatory molecules (tumor necrosis factor alpha, IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-12, IL-18, CD80, CD86, CD40, etc.), as well as anti-apoptotic proteins [1,4,5].
Pro-inflammatory cytokines, primarily IL-1 and IL-18, also activate the transcription factor NF-kB via a feedback mechanism, which in turn leads to a persistent inflammatory response and the development of clinical and laboratory manifestations of sJIA (fever, coagulopathy, increased vascular permeability, synovitis, acute-phase protein synthesis, leukocytosis, thrombocytosis) [1,4,5].
The hyperproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines is associated with the development of clinical manifestations of the disease (fever, polymorphic rash, serositis, enlargement of the liver, spleen, and lymph nodes, destructive arthritis; secondary macrophage activation syndrome (sMAS), osteoporosis) and pathological changes in laboratory parameters (leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, hyperproduction of amyloid A, haptoglobin, C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen) [1,4,5].
IL-1 is one of the central pro-inflammatory cytokines whose hyperproduction "triggers" sJIA. There are two forms of the cytokine: IL-1α and IL-1β. The dominant form in humans is IL-1β. The biological properties of IL-1α and IL-1β are similar. IL-1β regulates inflammatory and immune processes, stimulates the proliferation of T and B lymphocytes, the synthesis of other cytokines and acute-phase proteins by hepatocytes, and is a potent pyrogen, causing a hyperinflammatory reaction in sJIA. The development of sMAS is also associated with the hyperproduction of IL-1β [1,4,5].
IL-6 is a cytokine synthesized by lymphocytes, monocytes, fibroblasts, and other cells in response to Toll-like receptor activation mediated by pathogen- and damage-associated molecular patterns. The systemic effects of IL-6 include activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary system, increased thermogenesis, and fever; formation of the acute-phase response characterized by hyperproduction of CRP, amyloid A, hepcidin, fibrinogen, and ferritin, leading to a hyperinflammatory reaction. IL-6 stimulates the secretion of hepcidin by hepatocytes, which decreases iron absorption in the intestine and inhibits its release from macrophages, causing iron deficiency for erythropoiesis and the development of anemia. At elevated concentrations, IL-6 blocks the production of adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol, and growth hormone, leading to fatigue, drowsiness, depression, cognitive impairment, and growth retardation in children with sJIA [1,4,5].
When exposed to a trigger factor (viral and/or bacterial infection), patients with sJIA develop pyroptosis, which is a pro-inflammatory cell death. Pyroptosis is triggered when viral PAMPs or DAMPs formed during virus-induced cell damage bind to a Nod-like membrane receptor, which is a component of the NLRP3 inflammasome consisting of a sensor (NLRP3 receptor), an adapter (apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD, ASC), and an effector (procaspase-1). The NLRP3 inflammasome activates the classical caspase-1 inflammatory signaling cascade, which stimulates the hyperproduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 from precursor molecules and cleaves gasdermin D. In this process, the N-terminal domain of gasdermin D forms pores in the plasma membrane through which intracellular contents (DAMPs) are released into the extracellular space, followed by the development and amplification of the inflammatory response and the destruction of infected cells. Under the action of PAMPs and DAMPs, a non-classical signaling pathway via caspases-4, -5, and -11 can also be activated, which likewise cleave gasdermin D, leading to pyroptosis. As a result of programmed cell death, cytokines IL-1, IL-18, and IFN-γ are released, which in turn serve as a triggering mechanism for the development of sMAS, resulting from the uncontrolled expansion of T lymphocytes and macrophages against the background of reduced cytolytic activity of NK cells and CD8+ T lymphocytes [1,4,5].
In the so-called arthritic stage of sJIA, accompanied by the development of persistent polyarthritis, along with the activation of innate immunity, the adaptive immune response is activated, which is accompanied by the proliferation of Th17 lymphocytes, hyperproduction of IL-17, IL-1, TNF-alpha, and other pro-inflammatory cytokines produced during the activation of the adaptive immune system [1,4,5].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
The true global prevalence of sJIA is unknown. In Europe, it ranges from 0.3 to 0.8 per 100,000 children under 16 years of age. The proportion of sJIA in the structure of juvenile arthritis ranges from 5% to 15% in North America and Europe, and 50% in Japan [1,4,5].
According to the Federal Register of Persons with Hemophilia, Cystic Fibrosis, Pituitary Dwarfism, Gaucher Disease, Malignant Neoplasms of Lymphoid, Hematopoietic and Related Tissue, Multiple Sclerosis, Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome, Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Mucopolysaccharidosis Types I, II, and VI, Unspecified Aplastic Anemia, Hereditary Deficiency of Factors II (Fibrinogen), VII (Labile), X (Stuart-Prower), and Persons after Organ and/or Tissue Transplantation of the Russian Ministry of Health, 2,081 individuals with sJIA are registered, among them 1,310 children with sJIA, accounting for 3.5% of the structure of juvenile arthritis.
Systemic JIA develops in children aged 0 to 18 years. The peak incidence occurs at the age of 1–5 years. Boys and females are affected with equal frequency. No seasonality is observed [1,3–5].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
In the ICD, systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis is coded in the section "Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue (M00-M99)" – M08.2.
In accordance with ICD-10, the diagnosis is established as «Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (M08.2) with active/inactive systemic manifestations, with active/inactive arthritis (oligo-/polyarthritis)». When formulating the diagnosis, the following data must be indicated:
— degree of disease activity (0–3): high (3), moderate (2), low (1), remission/absence of activity (0) on therapy / without therapy, absence/presence of functional impairment of varying severity (functional class [FC] 1–4);
— radiographic stage (1–4), absence/presence of disease progression; absence/presence of disease flares (number of flares per year);
— need for therapy adjustment, possibility of achieving remission only with immunosuppressive therapy using drugs from several (2 or more) pharmacotherapeutic groups (excluding nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]), including biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs);
— presence of disease complications, complications resulting from ongoing pharmacotherapy.
Examples of diagnoses:
Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (M08.2) with absent or minor joint function impairment; radiographic stage I, no disease progression; with absent or present flares (no more than 1 time per year), degree 0 or I of inflammatory activity on therapy; FC I; no complications of the disease or ongoing pharmacotherapy (NSAIDs).
Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (M08.2) with moderate joint function impairment (FC II); radiographic stage II; progressive disease course: flares 2–4 times per year, persistent degree I or II inflammatory activity on immunosuppressive therapy; need for therapy adjustment, possibility of achieving remission only with immunosuppressive therapy using drugs from several (2 or more) pharmacotherapeutic groups (excluding NSAIDs), including bDMARDs; presence of complications of the disease and ongoing pharmacotherapy.
Systemic juvenile arthritis (M08.2) with severe impairment of statodynamic function due to joint involvement; radiological stage II or III, progressive disease course; frequent prolonged exacerbations (more than 4 times per year), functional class (FC) II or III; persistent inflammation activity of grade 2 or 3 despite immunosuppressive therapy; remission achievable only with immunosuppressive therapy using drugs from multiple (2 or more) pharmacotherapeutic groups (excluding NSAIDs), including biologic DMARDs; presence of complications from the disease and ongoing pharmacotherapy.
Systemic juvenile arthritis (M08.2) with very severe impairment of statodynamic functions due to joint involvement; radiological stage III or IV; rapidly progressive disease course; inflammation activity of grade 3; FC III or IV; low efficacy of or resistance to ongoing immunosuppressive therapy with drugs from multiple pharmacotherapeutic groups (2 or more, including biologic DMARDs); presence of irreversible complications from the disease and ongoing pharmacotherapy.
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
According to the ILAR classification, the disease is classified as systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA).
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR, 2021) distinguishes the following variants of the disease [6]:
— systemic JIA (systemic-onset juvenile arthritis) without macrophage activation syndrome (MAS);
— systemic JIA (systemic-onset juvenile arthritis) with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS).
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
The main clinical manifestations are: febris, macules, maculopapular rash, arthralgia, myalgia and/or oligo-, polyarthritis, enlargement of peripheral lymph nodes, and/or liver and/or spleen, and/or polyserositis.
Fever. Body temperature rises to ≥39°C once or twice a day at any time, but most often closer to the evening; typically accompanied by the appearance or worsening of a rash, drenching sweats, rarely chills; rapidly normalizes or drops below normal values, especially in the early morning hours; at disease onset, it may not have the typical sJIA pattern, and the clinical picture is often indistinguishable from sepsis. At the peak of the fever, the child's general condition is compromised, and it normalizes when the body temperature drops [1,3–5,7].
Rash. Typically, the rash in sJIA is macules and/or maculopapular, and/or linear, rarely urticarial or hemorrhagic (in macrophage activation syndrome). The size of the macules reaches 2–5 mm. The macules are usually surrounded by a pale halo, and a clearing area forms in the center of larger elements. The rash is non-pruritic, transient, appears and disappears without leaving a trace within a short time, intensifies at the peak of the fever, and is localized predominantly in the joint areas, on the face, lateral surfaces of the trunk, buttocks, and limbs [1,3–5,7].
Vasculitis. Typically, palmar and/or plantar capillaritis develops, causing a cyanotic discoloration of the palms and soles and mottling of the skin. Local angioedema is possible, most frequently localized in the hand area [1,3–5,7].
Lymphadenopathy. In most cases, enlargement of lymph nodes of almost all groups up to 4–6 cm in diameter is detected. The lymph nodes are typically mobile, painless, not matted together or to underlying tissues, and have a soft-elastic or dense-elastic consistency [1,3–5,7].
Cardiac involvement. Pericarditis develops in 40% of patients, mostly in older children regardless of sex, age at disease onset, and severity of joint syndrome; it may precede the manifestation of arthritis, usually develops at the peak of systemic exacerbations at any stage of the disease; often runs asymptomatically, but may be accompanied by dyspnoea, precordial pain aggravated in the supine position and radiating to the back, shoulders, and neck. The duration of the episode is 1–8 weeks. Physical examination reveals muffled heart sounds, tachycardia, enlargement of relative cardiac dullness borders, and a pericardial friction rub. In most cases, pericarditis is not accompanied by low QRS voltage, ST-segment elevation, or T-wave inversion on the electrocardiogram and is diagnosed only by echocardiography. Cardiac tamponade is a rare but serious complication of pericarditis. Chronic constrictive pericarditis occurs rarely.
Myocarditis develops much less frequently than pericarditis and may be accompanied by cardiomegaly and heart failure.
Endocarditis is not typical for sJIA [1,3–5,7].
Pulmonary involvement. Pulmonary parenchymal involvement is observed rarely. Pleuritis usually develops in combination with pericarditis, is often asymptomatic, and is diagnosed during instrumental examinations [1,3–5,7].
Liver and spleen involvement. Splenomegaly is most pronounced in the first years of the disease. Enlargement of the spleen can be significant, yet not accompanied by neutropenia.
Moderate or pronounced hepatomegaly in sJIA is quite common. Progressive hepatomegaly is characteristic of secondary amyloidosis. In some cases, fatty liver degeneration develops, associated with the use of glucocorticoids. An increase in liver transaminase levels is observed in approximately 25% of patients at disease onset. A rapid increase in AST, LDH, ALT, GGT, and ALP activity is characteristic of the development of MAS.
Cytolysis is a manifestation of the toxic effect on the liver of NSAIDs, immunosuppressants, and biologic DMARDs [1,3–5,7].
Nervous system involvement. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in patients with sJIA is rare, but significantly increases the risk of a fatal outcome. The development of encephalopathy, seizures, and intracranial hemorrhage is observed in secondary macrophage activation syndrome. Fatal cases have been observed in patients with aseptic meningitis, neutrophilic cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis, and brain edema associated with the rapid development of hyponatremia, likely linked to the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. The risk of developing hyponatremia is noted in patients with a sharp rise in body temperature and vomiting. One of the manifestations of CNS involvement in children with sJIA is a slight increase in intracranial pressure [1,3–5,7].
Joint involvement. Arthritis may be absent at disease onset and manifest as the disease progresses, in the vast majority of children within the first 3 months.
Joint syndrome is characterized by the development of polyarthritis; mono- and oligoarthritis are rare. Most commonly, the wrists, knees, and ankles are involved. In more than 50% of patients, the cervical spine, small joints of the hands, and temporomandibular joints are also affected. In some cases, for several months and sometimes years, joint syndrome is mild and manifests as arthralgias. In certain cases, severe polyarthritis develops with pronounced functional joint impairment, resistant to antirheumatic therapy. Patients with polyarthritis frequently develop tenosynovitis and synovial cysts [1,3–5,7].
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
2.1. Evaluation of patients with suspected systemic-onset juvenile arthritis
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
Complaints of elevated body temperature above 38°C from one to several times a day, skin rashes worsening at the peak of fever, fatigue, malaise at the peak of fever, muscle pain, pain and/or swelling in the joints, and/or morning stiffness.
It is recommended to analyze the gynecological and obstetric history of the mothers of all patients with suspected sJIA in order to identify factors predisposing to the development of the disease [1,3–5,7–9].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: elucidating the presence of urogenital and other infections (chlamydial, mycoplasmal, cytomegalovirus, herpetic, Epstein-Barr virus, etc.), which may be triggers of sJIA in the child, before and during pregnancy. Data on the course of previous pregnancies. It is necessary to find out whether intrauterine fetal death, chronic pregnancy loss, premature birth, primary or secondary infertility occurred. All these pathologies can be a consequence of intrauterine infection of the fetus, in particular viral and bacterial infection. Data on the course of the current pregnancy (hazards the mother was exposed to during pregnancy, first- and second-half gestoses, threat of miscarriage in early and late stages, anemia of pregnancy, diseases suffered during pregnancy). Data on the course of labor (timeliness of labor, duration of the water-free interval, duration of the first and second stages of labor, nature of the amniotic fluid, timeliness of placental separation and its quality).
It is recommended to analyze the life history of all patients in order to identify factors predisposing to the development of the disease [1,3–5,7–9].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: special attention should be paid to clinical manifestations of infections: conjunctivitis, omphalitis, balanitis, balanoposthitis, infected adhesions of the foreskin (in boys), cystitis, vulvovaginitis, vulvitis, asymptomatic leukocyturia, dysuric symptoms, cystitis (in girls), frequent otitis media, bronchitis, pneumonia, presence of herpetic eruptions on the face, frequent ARIs, intestinal infections. It is necessary to pay attention to the presence of allergic reactions, as well as reactions to vaccinations, presence of pets or birds in the household.
It is recommended to analyze the family history of all patients in order to identify factors predisposing to the development of the disease [1,3–5,7–9].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: it is necessary to determine whether the patient has first- or second-degree relatives suffering from the following conditions: rheumatoid arthritis, acute rheumatic fever, systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, scleroderma, etc., Reiter's disease, Bekhterev's disease (ankylosing spondylitis), Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriasis.
It is recommended to analyze the history of the disease in all patients to identify the specific features of the pathological process [1,3–5,7–9].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: evaluate the nature of the onset (acute or subacute, with or without joint involvement); potential trigger factors for the disease. Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) is typically characterized by an acute onset. Trigger factors most commonly include respiratory or intestinal infections, physical or psychological stress, hypothermia, sun exposure (insolation), and trauma. It is necessary to determine whether the patient received antibacterial drugs and/or glucocorticosteroids: which ones, what their dose was, and the duration of administration.
2.2 Physical Examination
It is recommended to perform diagnostic procedures, including differential diagnosis, in a rheumatology inpatient setting for all patients with suspected sJIA in order to confirm or exclude the diagnosis [1,3,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform general thermometry in all patients to assess the severity and character of fever [1,3–5,7,8].
(Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C).
Comments: in sJIA, body temperature rises to ≥ 38°C once or twice a day at any time, but most frequently closer to the evening. It is sometimes accompanied by drenching sweats, rarely by chills, and rapidly normalizes or drops below normal values, especially in the early morning hours. At disease onset, the fever may not exhibit the typical pattern of sJIA. When macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) develops, the fever becomes hectic.
It is recommended to evaluate the general condition of all patients for subsequent dynamic monitoring [1,3–5,7,8].
(LoE 4, GoR C)
Comments: at the peak of the fever, the general condition of children is moderate to severe. Not infrequently, the child cries from joint and muscle pain, cannot turn over in bed, and exhibits stiffness and weakness. As the body temperature drops, well-being normalizes, and the child becomes active. With the development of MAS, the condition deteriorates sharply. Altered consciousness and coma may develop. In severe uncontrolled cases, a fatal outcome is possible.
It is recommended to perform an examination of the skin in all patients to detect rash and signs of vasculitis [1,3–5,7,8,10].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: sJIA is characterized by a rash that is macular and/or maculopapular, linear, and rarely urticarial or hemorrhagic (in macrophage activation syndrome [MAS]). The size of the spots reaches 2–5 mm. The spots are usually surrounded by a pale halo, with a central area of clearing forming within larger elements. The rash is non-pruritory, transient, appears and disappears without leaving a trace within a short period, worsens at the height of fever, and is localized predominantly around the joints, on the face, lateral surfaces of the torso, buttocks, and extremities. When MAS develops, a pruritic, linear, atypical, and hemorrhagic rash appears.
sJIA typically features palmar and/or plantar capillaritis, causing a cyanotic coloration of the palms and soles and a "mottled" skin appearance. Local angioedema is possible, most frequently localized in the hand region.
It is recommended to inspect and palpate the lymph nodes in all patients to detect peripheral lymphadenopathy [1,3–5,7,8,10].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: in the majority of patients with sJIA, enlargement of practically all groups of lymph nodes is detected. The lymph nodes are usually mobile, painless, not fused to each other or to underlying tissues, and have a soft-elastic or firm-elastic consistency.
It is recommended to analyze complaints, perform examination, percussion, and palpation of the cardiovascular system in all patients to identify physical signs of its involvement [1,3–5,7,8,10–12].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: pericarditis develops more frequently in older children and is usually asymptomatic, but may be accompanied by shortness of breath, chest pain that intensifies in the recumbent position and radiates to the back, shoulders, and neck; in some cases, it precedes the manifestation of arthritis, develops at the peak of systemic manifestation exacerbations at any stage of the disease, and is accompanied by a systemic inflammatory response. The duration of the episode is 1–8 weeks. Pericarditis in sJIA is in most cases not accompanied by low voltage, ST-segment elevation, or T-wave inversion according to electrocardiography (ECG). It is frequently diagnosed via echocardiography (EchoCG).
Myocarditis develops significantly less frequently than pericarditis and may be accompanied by cardiomegaly and heart failure.
Percussion may reveal widening of the relative cardiac dullness borders; auscultation may reveal muffled heart sounds, a systolic murmur at the mitral valve projection point, tachycardia, less commonly bradycardia; rarely, a pericardial friction rub.
Endocarditis is not characteristic of sJIA.
It is recommended to analyze complaints, perform examination, percussion, and palpation of the respiratory system in all patients to identify physical signs of its involvement [1,3–5,7,8,10,13].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: in some cases, the child may complain of a cough, difficulty breathing, or shortness of breath. In sJIA, pulmonary parenchyma involvement is rarely observed. Pleuritis usually develops in combination with pericarditis, is frequently asymptomatic, and is diagnosed via radiological examination of the lungs. Visually, upon patient examination, signs of pulmonary involvement may not be detected; in some cases, signs of respiratory failure may be present: tachypnea, retractions of compliant chest areas, the epigastric region, and areas of diaphragmatic attachment to the costal margin; cyanosis. The percussion sound may be normal with a tympanic note, or dullness of the percussion sound may be detected in the posterior-inferior lung regions; auscultation may reveal moist rales of various calibers, crepitant rales, pleural friction rubs, and decreased breath sounds in the posterior-inferior lung regions.
It is recommended to analyze complaints, perform examination, percussion, and palpation of the digestive system in all patients to identify physical signs of its involvement [1,3–5,7,8,10].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: patients with sJIA often complain of epigastric pain and dyspeptic symptoms. Periumbilical pain may be associated with enlargement of mesenteric lymph nodes. Physical examination may reveal underweight, coated tongue, abdominal distension; percussion reveals enlargement of the liver and spleen (splenomegaly is most pronounced in the first years of the disease; spleen enlargement can be significant). Hepatomegaly develops less frequently than splenomegaly. Progressive enlargement of the liver is characteristic of secondary amyloidosis. Palpation may reveal tenderness in the epigastrium at the projection points of the gallbladder, duodenum, and pancreas, as well as hepatosplenomegaly; in case of intestinal involvement, tenderness in the ileocecal region and along the colon may be detected.
The majority of children with sJIA develop inflammation of the upper gastrointestinal tract (GI), associated with the use of large amounts of antipyretics and NSAIDs.
If there are complaints of frequent loose stools with mucus and/or blood and/or greenish discoloration, pain in the ileocecal region, and abdominal distension, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) should be suspected and differential diagnosis continued.
It is recommended to perform a joint examination in all patients to detect arthritis [1,3–5,7,8,10,14].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: sJIA is characterized by pronounced arthralgia, especially at the peak of fever; morning stiffness of varying duration; and inflammatory joint pain that develops after periods of rest and diminishes with physical activity. The articular syndrome in sJIA has a diverse clinical course: disease onset may present solely with arthralgia and myalgia; evanescent arthritis affecting large joints; persistent symmetric oligo- or polyarthritis primarily affecting large joints; or generalized polyarthritis involving small joints and the cervical spine. In some patients, the disease may follow a prolonged course (months, years) without persistent joint syndrome.
The majority of patients with sJIA develop polyarthritis, which is characterized by resistance to antirheumatic therapy and pronounced functional joint impairment. Patients with polyarthritis frequently develop tenosynovitis and synovial cysts. Most commonly involved are the wrist, knee, and ankle joints. In more than 50% of patients, the cervical spine joints, small joints of the hands, and temporomandibular joints are also affected. At disease onset, the articular syndrome may be minimal, but its extent increases over several months. In some cases, for several years, the joint syndrome is mild and manifests only as arthralgia. Joints must be examined for the presence of swelling. The skin temperature over the joints should be assessed, followed by the temperature difference between symmetrical skin areas.
It is recommended to determine the range of motion in all joints: measuring the range of passive motion of a single joint in one plane, and measuring the range of active motion of a single joint in one plane in all patients to detect functional impairment [1,3–5,7,8,10,14].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: if joints are painless at a normal range of motion, it is necessary to assess for the onset of pain (protective muscle spasm, resistance) at the maximum range of motion.
Assessment of the range of motion:
— Cervical spine. Ask the patient to: tilt the head backward (normal extension is 50–60°), touch the sternum with the chin (normal flexion is 45°), turn the head to the right and left (normal rotation is 60–80°), touch the right and left shoulder with the head (lateral flexion is 40°).
— Temporomandibular joints. Ask the patient to: open the mouth, protrude and retrude the mandible, and perform side-to-side lateral movements of the mandible.
— Shoulder joints. Ask the patient to: raise the arms laterally and upward, touch the right and left ear over the back of the head, touch the right and left scapula with the contralateral hand from behind, independently remove a shirt or T-shirt, and comb their hair.
— Elbow joints. Ask the patient to: place the hands on the shoulders (normal flexion angle is no more than 20°), extend the arm at the elbow joint (normal is at least 180°), and check pronation and supination (normal is 90°).
— Wrist joints. Check: dorsiflexion (normal is 70°), palmar flexion (normal is 90°).
— Small joints of the hands. Ask the patient to: make a tight fist, independently remove socks and tights, and button and unbutton clothes.
— Normally, the fingers easily touch the palm.
— Hip joints: check abduction (at least 140°), adduction (the thighs and knees should touch the chest), external and internal rotation (normal is at least 40–45°).
— Internal rotation test in the hip joints. The child lies supine with the hips and knees flexed at a 90° angle. Keeping the knees together, the lower legs are rotated outward.
— In almost all hip joint diseases, internal rotation is the first to be affected.
— Knee joints. Ask the patient to: flex the knees (the heel should touch the buttock), kneel down and lower the buttocks onto the heels, extend the knees (180° angle), and squat down.
— Check for the patellar tap (ballotment) sign.
— The lower extremities are flexed at the knee joints. Normally, the heels touch the buttocks without difficulty. The lower extremities are maximally extended at the knee joints with the child in the supine position.
— Joints of the feet and ankles. Check: dorsiflexion (normal angle is 45°), plantar flexion (normal angle is 20°), supination (inward rotation of the foot is 30°), pronation (outward rotation of the foot is 20°). Ask the patient to: stand on tiptoes and walk, and walk on their heels (normally a child should do this without difficulty). Observe for asymmetry when moving the ankles in different directions. A noticeable restriction of flexion is usually detected without difficulty, even in the absence of visible joint swelling.
It is recommended to assess gait in all patients to identify the pattern of gait abnormalities [1,3–5,7,8,10,14].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: gait variants:
— with rapid weight transfer from the affected leg to the healthy one (involvement of the knee, hip joints, or feet). The patient steps on the entire foot or forefoot (heel involvement),
— "Waddling" gait (bilateral hip joint involvement).
— Observation of gait during walking and running: limping in a patient is an important diagnostic clue for detecting pain or stiffness. Limping and gait abnormalities are most pronounced in children with sJIA in the morning hours due to morning stiffness. When examining the patient in the afternoon, there may be no limp, and gait abnormalities may be minimal or absent.
It is recommended to perform an examination of the muscular system in all patients to identify the nature of its involvement [1,3–5,7,8,10,14].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: myalgia is characteristic of sJIA and often occurs at the peak of systemic manifestations activity. In terms of pain severity, myalgia may exceed arthralgia. Some patients experience myositis with muscle edema, pain, and elevated blood levels of muscle breakdown enzymes. In the presence of active arthritis, muscle atrophy develops proximal to the affected joint.
It is recommended to rule out diseases that can present with similar clinical symptoms in all patients, especially those with active systemic manifestations without persistent articular syndrome, before prescribing antirheumatic therapy [1,3,7,15].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: diseases that should be excluded during diagnosis:
— malignancies (neuroblastoma, solid tumors, hemoblastoses, lymphoproliferative diseases);
— autoinflammatory syndromes;
— IBD;
— other rheumatic diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, dermatomyositis, polyarteritis nodosa, Kawasaki disease, sarcoidosis, Castleman disease);
— immunodeficiency states;
— infectious diseases (acute inflammatory response, tuberculosis, bacterial endocarditis, acute rheumatic fever, yersiniosis, salmonellosis, cat-scratch disease, toxoplasmosis, Lyme disease, borreliosis, leishmaniasis, Mycoplasma infection, infections caused by cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, etc.);
— toxic-allergic reactions to medications.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (including erythrocyte sedimentation rate determination, red blood cell count, white blood cell count, platelet count, differential leukocyte count [leukocyte formula], and hemoglobin level determination) in all patients to assess disease activity and detect pathological changes [1,3,7,8,16].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: findings in sJIA include: leukocytosis with a neutrophil left shift, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), hypochromic anemia, and thrombocytosis. The complete blood count findings are not specific for sJIA; therefore, the differential diagnostic workup must continue. First and foremost, hemoblastoses, lymphoproliferative disorders, and oncological diseases must be excluded.
It is recommended to determine the prothrombin index, measure soluble fibrin monomer complexes in the blood, determine prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, blood protein C level, protein S activity, plasminogen level, fibrinogen level, D-dimer concentration, von Willebrand factor activity and properties, and antithrombin III activity in all patients to assess the state of the hemostatic system [3,7,17–24].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: sJIA is characterized by hypocoagulation or hypercoagulation changes in the hemostatic system, whereas MAS is characterized by hypocoagulation.
It is recommended to perform thromboelastography in all patients to assess the severity of hemostatic disorders and the risk of thrombosis and bleeding [17,19,20,25–29].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine ABO blood groups, subgroups and other minor blood groups A-1, A-2, D, Cc, E, Kell, Duffy, and the Rhesus D antigen (Rh factor) in all patients prior to invasive procedures (esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy with biopsy, bone marrow aspiration for cytological preparation, bone marrow trephine biopsy imprint cytology, bone biopsy) [1,30–33].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to measure the serum C-reactive protein level in all patients to determine the severity of the inflammatory process [1,3–5,7,8,10,14,34].
(Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: serum C-reactive protein levels are significantly elevated in sJIA.
It is recommended to perform a blood test for total protein, blood test for albumin, blood test for total bilirubin, blood test for free and conjugated bilirubin, blood test for creatinine, blood test for urea, blood test for uric acid, blood test for glucose, blood test for ferritin, blood test for triglycerides, blood test for cholesterol, blood test for sodium, blood test for potassium, blood test for total calcium, blood test for lactate dehydrogenase activity, blood test for aspartate aminotransferase activity, blood test for alanine aminotransferase activity, blood test for gamma-glutamyl transferase activity, blood test for alkaline phosphatase activity, blood test for serum iron, blood test for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood test for cholesterol, blood test for creatine kinase activity, blood test for pancreatic amylase activity, and blood test for lipase activity in all patients to identify pathological changes and rule out other rheumatic and non-rheumatic diseases [1,3,7–9,34–36].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: an elevated serum ferritin, triglycerides, ALT, AST, and LDH may be observed in secondary/primary macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), as well as drug toxicity, malignancy, hemoblastosis, lymphoproliferative disease, other rheumatic diseases, or sepsis, which provides grounds for continuing the differential diagnosis.
It is recommended to determine the levels of antibodies to cell nucleus antigens and DNA; rheumatoid factor (RF) in the blood; markers of ANCA-associated vasculitis: PR3 (c-ANCA), MPO (p-ANCA); centromere antibodies in the blood; RNA antibodies in the blood; antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) in the blood; antinuclear antibodies to Sm antigen in the blood; antibodies to RNA polymerase (Ro antigen) and RNA-associated protein (La antigen) in the blood; phospholipid antibodies in the blood; cardiolipin antibodies in the blood; beta-2-glycoprotein antibodies in the blood; Scl-70 antibodies in the blood; and complement fractions C3 and C4 in all patients to verify the diagnosis and determine disease activity [1,3,7–9,34].
(Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), complement fractions C3 and C4 are within normal limits or elevated. Autoantibodies are not detected.
It is recommended to measure blood immunoglobulin levels in all patients to assess immune status and rule out primary immunodeficiency [1,3,7–9,34]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: blood immunoglobulin levels in sJIA are within normal limits.
It is recommended to determine HLA antigens (HLA-B27 antigen) in all patients to rule out HLA-B27-associated spondyloarthropathies [1,3,7,37]. (LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the presence of HLA-B27 is an exclusion criterion for the diagnosis of sJIA.
It is recommended to perform a panel of tests for the diagnosis of cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes and other autoinflammatory syndromes in all patients to rule them out [7,38,39].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: mutations in genes responsible for familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome (FCAS), Muckle-Wells syndrome (MWS), and neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease (NOMID/CINCA) are assessed.
It is recommended to measure blood procalcitonin levels in all patients to rule out sepsis [7,40].
(LoE 3, GoR C)
Comments: in an acute inflammatory response, blood procalcitonin levels are elevated. In sJIA without infectious complications, they remain within reference ranges.
It is recommended to determine serum antistreptolysin-O in all patients to detect/rule out group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus infection [3,7,34].
(LoE 3, GoR C)
Comments: an elevated serum antistreptolysin-O level indicates acute or chronic streptococcal infection and does not rule out the presence of sJIA.
It is recommended to analyze lymphocyte subpopulations in all patients to detect/rule out immunodeficiencies [3,7,41,42].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform a tuberculin skin test (Mantoux test, or test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen in standard dilution**) and a blood interferon-gamma release assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens in all patients to detect/rule out Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection [3,7,43–46].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine blood antibodies of classes A, M, G (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci; antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae in the blood; class G antibodies (IgG) to Chlamydia trachomatis in the blood; and antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the blood in all patients to rule out an infectious process that may present with a clinical picture similar to sJIA [1,3,7,47–51].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Salmonella enterica in the blood; antibodies to Salmonella typhi in the blood; antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in the blood; and antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica serovars in the blood in all patients to detect/rule out an infectious process that may present with a clinical picture similar to sJIA [1,3,7,48,52–61].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Shigella boydii in the blood; antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Shigella dysenteriae in the blood; antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Shigella sonnei in the blood; and antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to Shigella flexneri in the blood in all patients to detect/rule out an infectious process that may present with a clinical picture similar to sJIA [1,3,7,48,52,62–64].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform PCR detection of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato spirochetes (causative agents of tick-borne borreliosis) DNA in the blood; determination of class M antibodies (IgM) to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato spirochetes in the blood; determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato spirochetes in the blood; and determination of total antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato spirochetes in the blood in patients with a history of visiting a forest, living in tick-endemic areas, or a tick bite, to rule out borreliosis [3,7,65–67].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative PCR detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in peripheral and cord blood; qualitative PCR detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in oropharyngeal swabs; and qualitative PCR detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in urine in all patients to detect/rule out herpesvirus infections [1,3,7,47,68–75].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative PCR detection of Cytomegalovirus DNA in peripheral and cord blood; qualitative PCR detection of Cytomegalovirus DNA in oropharyngeal swabs; and qualitative PCR detection of Cytomegalovirus DNA in urine in all patients to detect/rule out herpesvirus infections [3,7,70,72,75–79].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative PCR testing of blood for Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA, qualitative PCR testing of oropharyngeal swabs for Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA, and qualitative PCR testing of urine for Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in all patients to identify/rule out diseases caused by herpesviruses [1,3,7,70,72,75,80].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine IgM and IgG antibodies to Cytomegalovirus in the blood of all patients to detect/rule out active cytomegalovirus infection [1,72,75,78,79,81,82].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine IgM and IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of all patients to detect/rule out diseases caused by Epstein-Barr virus [3,7,69,72,75,83].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen (VCA) in the blood of all patients to detect/rule out diseases caused by Epstein-Barr virus [3,7,69,83].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus early antigens (EA) in the blood of all patients to detect/rule out diseases caused by Epstein-Barr virus [3,7,69,83].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Herpes simplex virus in the blood of all patients to detect/rule out diseases caused by herpes simplex virus [1,3,7,47,72,75,84–87].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform molecular biological testing of blood for Toxoplasma gondii in patients with a history of animal contact to rule out toxoplasmosis [33,88–90].
(Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Leishmania in the blood of patients with a history of travel to endemic areas to rule out leishmaniasis [91–93].
(LoE 3, GoR B)
It is recommended to perform molecular biological testing of blood for Hepatitis C virus and molecular biological testing of blood for Hepatitis B virus in all patients with clinical and laboratory signs of hepatitis for differential diagnosis [3,7,94–96].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in patients with sJIA, hepatitis may develop due to the uncontrolled use of NSAIDs and may also be a sign of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibodies to Hepatitis C virus in the blood of all patients with clinical and laboratory signs of hepatitis for differential diagnosis [3,7,94–96].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine IgM and IgG antibodies to Human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 in the blood, and IgM and IgG antibodies to Human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 in the blood of patients with signs of immunodeficiency to detect/rule out HIV infection [7,97,98].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) examination of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal wall mucus for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms in all patients to rule out nasopharyngeal contamination with pathogenic and opportunistic flora [1,3,7,99,100].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) blood test for sterility and microbiological (culture) urine test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic microorganisms in all patients to detect/rule out an acute inflammatory response (sepsis) and bacteremia [1,3,7,47,101–105].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform a general (clinical) urinalysis, determine urine albumin, and quantify protein in a 24-hour urine collection in all patients to rule out renal involvement [1,3,7,106,107].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to test stool calprotectin levels in all patients to rule out inflammatory bowel diseases [3,7,108–110].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive ultrasound examination (ultrasound) of internal organs (including a comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and renal ultrasound) in all patients to detect hepatosplenomegaly, parenchymal changes in the liver and spleen, and lymphadenopathy [1,3,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform echocardiography in all patients to assess cardiac status [1,3,7,111,112].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: myocarditis manifests as left ventricular dilation, decreased left ventricular ejection fraction, hypokinesia of the left ventricular posterior wall and/or interventricular septum, aortitis, signs of relative mitral, aortic, and/or tricuspid valve regurgitation, and elevated pulmonary artery pressure. Pericarditis manifests as separation of pericardial leaflets and free fluid in the pericardial cavity. The endocardium and valve apparatus are typically unaffected in sJIA. If endocardial involvement is present, acute rheumatic fever and infective endocarditis must be ruled out.
It is recommended to record an electrocardiogram in all patients to assess cardiac function [1,3,7,111,112].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: if myocarditis is present, signs of left and/or right heart overload are detected. In most cases, pericarditis is not accompanied by decreased QRS voltage, ST-segment elevation, or T-wave inversion on the ECG.
It is recommended to perform joint ultrasound in all patients to assess the degree of joint effusion and the condition of the synovial membrane and cartilage [1,3,7,113–117].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: sJIA is characterized by increased synovial fluid volume, thickening (hypertrophy) of the synovial membrane, cartilage fibrillation, and cartilage erosion.
It is recommended to perform X-ray imaging of the temporomandibular joint and/or spinal articulations, and/or elbow joint, and/or wrist joint, and/or knee joint, and/or shoulder joint, and/or hip joint, and/or ankle joint, and/or acromioclavicular joint, and/or sternoclavicular joint, and/or hand, and/or foot in two projections, or computed tomography of the joint with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients with joint involvement to detect destructive bone changes typical and atypical for juvenile arthritis [1,3,7,113,118].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: sJIA findings include osteoporosis, destructive changes in bone structures, joint space narrowing, status of articular surfaces of bones forming the joint, erosions, surface usuration, cysts, foci of bone necrosis, subluxations, fractures, osteophytes, calcifications, etc. Simultaneous examination of symmetrical joints is required. Cartilage and bone tissue changes are detected in the majority of patients. X-ray examination 2 years after disease onset reveals joint space narrowing in 30% of patients, erosions in 35%, and bone growth disturbances in 10%. Early radiographic changes develop in the wrist, hip, and shoulder joints. After 6.5 years, joint space narrowing is detected in 39% of patients, erosions in 64%, and bone growth disturbances in 25%. Aggressive sJIA leads to ankylosis of the wrist and cervical spine apophyseal joints, as well as avascular necrosis of the hip joints.
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a single joint with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients with arthritis to rule out traumatic injuries to the musculotendinous and ligamentous apparatus or menisci, or tumors, and to detect pannus growth and pathological changes in the synovial membrane and cartilage in early stages of sJIA [1,3,7,119].
(LEL 1, GOR A)
It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the joint with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients with mono- or oligoarthritis and atypical MRI findings of sJIA to rule out bone tuberculosis, osteomyelitis, benign and malignant tumors, and bone metastases [3,7,43,44,76,113,118,120–122].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients to rule out inflammatory and erosive-ulcerative processes [3,7,108,109,123–130].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of Helicobacter pylori gastric mucosal biopsy specimens in patients with inflammatory and/or erosive, and/or ulcerative changes according to esophagogastroduodenoscopy to rule out gastrointestinal pathology associated with Helicobacter pylori [3,7,108,109,123–127,129–132].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform an endoscopic biopsy of the esophagus, endoscopic biopsy of the stomach, endoscopic biopsy of the duodenum, and endoscopic biopsy of the jejunum with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management), followed by pathomorphological examination of the esophageal biopsy (surgical) material, pathomorphological examination of the gastric biopsy (surgical) material, pathomorphological examination of the duodenal biopsy (surgical) material, and pathomorphological examination of the jejunal material in patients with inflammatory, erosive, and/or ulcerative mucosal changes to rule out inflammatory bowel diseases [3,7,108,109,123–127,133–137].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform colonoscopy with anesthesia (including early postoperative management), endoscopic colonic biopsy, and pathomorphological examination of the colonic biopsy (surgical) material in patients with fever, clinical manifestations of intestinal involvement, and/or elevated fecal calprotectin levels to detect/rule out inflammatory bowel diseases [3,7,108,109,123–127,133–137].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform video capsule endoscopy of the small intestine in patients with clinical signs of inflammatory bowel diseases and/or elevated fecal calprotectin levels when esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy show no abnormalities, in order to rule out Crohn's disease with isolated small bowel involvement [3,7,108,109,123–127,138].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the chest organs with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients to detect/rule out pulmonary involvement, other rheumatic diseases, oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases, and tuberculosis [3,7,44,76,121,139–141].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, intravenous contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal organs, intravenous contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the retroperitoneal space, and intravenous contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic organs with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients to detect/rule out oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases, tuberculosis, and abscesses [3,7,43,139,142–146].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform intravenous bolus contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdominal organs and intravenous bolus contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the retroperitoneal space with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients with contraindications to MRI to rule out internal organ involvement in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), and to detect/rule out oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases, tuberculosis, and abscesses [3,7,76,143,147,148].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to obtain a bone marrow cytologic specimen via puncture and a bone marrow histologic specimen with anesthesia (including early postoperative management), along with a cytologic examination of the bone marrow smear (myelogram) and pathomorphological examination of the bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods, in all patients at the diagnosis stage prior to prescribing glucocorticoids (GCs) and/or immunosuppressants, and/or targeted biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) to detect/rule out oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases/metastatic bone marrow involvement, or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: if GCs or immunosuppressants are used, the test should be performed no earlier than 2 weeks after their withdrawal. In all patients with pronounced enlargement of peripheral and/or intrathoracic, and/or intra-abdominal lymph nodes at the diagnostic stage prior to prescribing GCs and/or immunosuppressants, and/or bDMARDs, it is recommended to perform a lymph node biopsy (peripheral, or intra-abdominal/intrathoracic as indicated) with cytological examination of the lymph node tissue preparation and pathomorphological examination of the lymph node biopsy (surgical) material to rule out hemoblastoses, lymphoproliferative diseases, and metastatic lymph node involvement.
It is recommended to perform a lymph node biopsy (peripheral, or intra-abdominal/intrathoracic as indicated) with anesthesia (including early postoperative management), accompanied by cytological examination of the lymph node tissue preparation and pathomorphological examination of the lymph node biopsy (surgical) material, in patients with pronounced enlargement of peripheral, intrathoracic, and/or intra-abdominal lymph nodes to detect/rule out hemoblastoses, lymphoproliferative diseases, and metastatic lymph node involvement [3,7,76,143,147,148].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the study is performed at the stage of diagnosis establishment prior to prescribing glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressants, and/or targeted biologic DMARDs. If glucocorticoids or immunosuppressants have been used, the study is performed no earlier than 2 weeks after their discontinuation.
It is recommended to perform positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)) with contrast enhancement, and, if necessary, whole-body positron emission tomography with tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)) with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management), in patients with severe arthralgia, myalgia, ossalgia, bone destruction lesions, subcutaneous adipose tissue infiltrates, or lesions in parenchymal organs, the brain, or spinal cord, to detect/rule out oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases [3,7,146–148].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform multi-position bone scintigraphy with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients with bone destruction lesions atypical for juvenile arthritis, to detect/rule out malignant and benign bone tumors and metastatic bone lesions [3,7,122,146–148,150,153].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform CT-guided core needle biopsy of the pelvic bones with anesthesia (including early postoperative management), accompanied by pathomorphological examination of the bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods; cytological examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; immunocytochemical examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; and immunophenotyping of hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow, in patients with an atypical course of sJIA during the evaluation stage, prior to prescribing GCs, immunosuppressants, and/or bDMARDs, to detect/rule out oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative diseases/metastatic bone marrow involvement [3,7,122,146–148,150,153].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: in case of GC or immunosuppressant administration, the test is performed no earlier than 2 weeks after their discontinuation.
It is recommended to perform a bone biopsy with anesthesia (including early postoperative management) and pathomorphological examination of the bone tissue biopsy (surgical) material in patients with bone destruction lesions atypical for juvenile arthritis, in order to detect/rule out malignant and benign tumors and metastatic bone lesions [3,7,122,147,148,150–152].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: destruction lesions are characteristic of multifocal osteomyelitis, malignant neoplasms, and hemoblastoses, which can present with episodes of febrile fever accompanied by pain in the abdomen, chest, joints, and bones. Bone biopsy is necessary for differential diagnosis [154].
2.5 Other Procedures
2.1.5. Other diagnostic procedures
It is recommended to schedule an initial consultation/examination by a pediatric oncologist for patients in whom an oncological or onco-hematological disease is suspected based on examination results, in order to rule it out [3,7,122,147,148,150,151].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: performed based on the results of examinations (computed tomography of the chest cavity organs; magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal cavity, magnetic resonance imaging of the retroperitoneal space and pelvis with intravenous contrast enhancement; cytological examination of bone marrow smear (myelogram), pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods; cytological and immunocytochemical examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints; immunophenotyping of hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow; cytological examination of lymph node tissue preparation and pathomorphological examination of lymph node biopsy (surgical) material; positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)) with contrast enhancement, whole-body positron emission tomography with tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)); bone scintigraphy; pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material (trephine biopsy) using immunohistochemical methods, bone biopsy with pathomorphological examination of biopsy (surgical) material).
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a phthisiatrician for patients with a positive focal tuberculin skin test and/or intradermal test with a tuberculosis allergen, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or infiltrative foci in the lungs in order to rule out tuberculosis [3,7,43,44,120,155–157].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by an orthopedic traumatologist for patients with mass and destructive changes, as well as bone deformations not typical for sJIA in order to rule out septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, and other surgical pathology [3,7,158].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by an otorhinolaryngologist for all patients in order to identify foci of chronic ENT infection [3,7,76].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by an ophthalmologist with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy for all patients in order to detect eye involvement [3,7,76,159,160].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: ocular biomicroscopy is mandatory.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a pediatric dentist for all patients in order to determine the condition of the oral cavity [3,7,161].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a neurologist for patients with neurological symptoms, severe pain syndrome, psychomotor retardation, or psychotic reactions in order to rule out central and peripheral nervous system pathology [3,7,76,162,163].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by an otolaryngologist-audiologist and carry out an audiogram for patients with suspected autoinflammatory syndromes in order to rule out/confirm hearing loss [3,7,39,164].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a geneticist for patients with multiple minor developmental anomalies, connective tissue dysplasia syndrome, or suspected autoinflammatory syndromes in order to determine the strategy for further investigation [3,7,39,164].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for patients scheduled for procedures under general anesthesia in order to assess their status [30,31,165,166].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for critically ill patients in order to decide on their transfer to the intensive care unit [30,31,165,167].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to provide 24-hour monitoring by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for all patients in critical condition (multiorgan failure, macrophage activation syndrome) in order to deliver care in an intensive care unit setting [30,31,165,167].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (testing, assessment) by a medical psychologist for all patients starting from 1 year of age and their parents (regardless of the child's age) to harmonize the development of the child's personality under conditions of severe chronic disease and optimize parent-child relationships; to improve treatment adherence and cooperation with the physician and medical staff to achieve disease remission; to achieve social psychological adaptation; and to develop an individual psychological rehabilitation program for the patient and their parents [7,168–174].
(LEL 2, GOR A)
2.1.6. Criteria for diagnosing systemic-onset juvenile arthritis
Currently, 3 sets of classification criteria have been developed that can be used in the diagnosis of sJIA.
Core metrics
International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) classification criteria [2].
The diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis is established in the presence of arthritis in one or more joints accompanied by (or preceded by) documented intermittent fever lasting for at least 3 days for a minimum of 2 weeks, combined with one or more of the following features:
- short-lived (evanescent) erythematous rash;
- generalized lymphadenopathy;
- hepatomegaly and (or) splenomegaly;
- serositis (pericarditis, and/or pleuritis, and/or peritonitis) with other diseases excluded.
A diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis cannot be established in the presence of:
- psoriasis (including a history thereof) in the patient or first-degree relatives (parents, siblings);
- arthritis associated with the class I major histocompatibility complex antigen HLA-B27 in boys older than 6 years of age;
- ankylosing spondylitis;
- enthesitis-related arthritis;
- sacroiliitis associated with inflammatory bowel disease;
- Reiter's syndrome;
- acute anterior uveitis;
- any of these diseases in first-degree relatives;
- positive rheumatoid factor of immunoglobulin M (IgM) class in at least 2 samples taken at least 3 months apart.
Additional criteria are not validated in the pediatric population or are under development.
Yamaguchi classification criteria for adult-onset Still's disease [175].
Patients with sJIA may lack arthritis for a significant period of time (especially at disease onset).
Yamaguchi criteria may be useful in this subgroup of patients during the pre-arthritis phase of the disease.
Major criteria
- fever of 39°C or higher for at least 1 week
- arthralgia for 2 weeks or more
- maculopapular rash
- leukocytosis >10.0*109/L with neutrophils >80%
Minor criteria
- sore throat
- lymphadenopathy and/or splenomegaly
- elevated AST, ALT levels
- negative ANA and RF
Exclusion criteria
- infections
- oncological and hematological diseases
- other rheumatic diseases
The diagnosis can be established in the presence of 5 criteria, including at least 2 major criteria.
Preliminary classification criteria for juvenile idiopathic arthritis developed by the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) [176].
The diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis is established in patients with disease onset under the age of 18 in the presence of fever for at least 3 days over a minimum of 2 weeks, combined with two major criteria or one major and two minor criteria:
Major criteria
- short-lived, evanescent erythematous rash
- arthritis (of any duration)
Minor criteria
- generalized lymphadenopathy, hepato- and/or splenomegaly
- serositis
- arthralgia lasting ≥2 weeks
- leukocytosis >15.0*109/L with neutrophilia
2.2. Evaluation of patients with suspected hemophagocytic syndrome
Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) is a complication of systemic JIA, a dangerous hyperinflammatory syndrome representing the culmination of a severe uncontrolled reaction characterized by hypercytokinemia with a massive yet ineffective immune response. It is a consequence of the innate or acquired inability of the immune system to cope with the trigger—most commonly an infectious agent [36,177–183].
Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH) is triggered by viruses (cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, herpesviruses, etc.), medications (NSAIDs, gold preparations, sulfasalazine, etc.). Secondary sHLH is a consequence of excessive activation and expansion of mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) cells and T lymphocytes, manifested by cytopenia, systemic inflammatory response, and damage to the liver and spleen. The cells comprising the MPS form a single differentiation lineage, which includes bone marrow progenitor cells as well as a pool of monocytes and macrophages. Overall, the MPS acts as a specific biological filter for blood and lymph, removing tumor cells, virus-infected cells, microorganisms, toxins, various metabolites, and circulating immune complexes. Histiocytes (syn.: macrophages) also perform antigen-presenting functions [36,177–183].
It is not always possible to diagnose sHLH because its clinical and laboratory manifestations may resemble a flare of systemic JIA, as well as an infectious process [36,177–183].
2.2.1. Physical examination
It is recommended that diagnosis, including differential diagnosis, be performed in a rheumatology inpatient setting when secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is suspected in all patients in order to confirm/exclude it [1,3,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to assess the severity and pattern of fever in all patients to identify features characteristic of sHLH [1,3,7,177,179,180,182].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: fever (persistent or non-remitting) is one of the main clinical symptoms of sHLH. It is invariably refractory to anti-infective treatment. At the same time, normalization of body temperature as a result of immunosuppressive therapy serves as one of the signs supporting the diagnosis of HLH.
It is recommended to assess the general condition of all patients to develop a diagnostic and treatment strategy [1,3,7,177,179,180,182].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the course of sHLH ranges from mild, with minimal symptom severity, to severe. In severe uncontrolled sHLH, impaired consciousness or coma may develop, and a fatal outcome is possible.
It is recommended to perform a skin examination in all patients to identify pathological changes [1,3,7,177,179,180,182].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: pallor and jaundice of the skin indicate the development of anemia, progression of hepatitis, and coagulopathy; edema syndrome indicates the development of capillary leak syndrome and renal failure.
The frequency of skin manifestations in sHLH ranges from 6 to 65%. Skin lesions may present as a generalized maculopapular rash, erythroderma, edema, panniculitis, morbilliform rash, and purpura. Some manifestations are similar to those seen in Kawasaki disease.
Pathological examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material reveals lymphohistiocytic infiltration of the dermis with evidence of hemophagocytosis.
It is recommended to perform an examination of the lymph nodes in all patients to identify pathological changes [1,3,7,177,179,180,182].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: with the development of sHLH, lymph node size significantly increases, and generalized lymphadenopathy develops.
It is recommended to analyze complaints, anamnesis, and perform an examination, percussion, and auscultation of the cardiovascular system in all patients to detect pathological changes in the heart and blood vessels [1,3,7,177,179,180,182].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: progressive sHPS leads to microangiopathy with thrombosis, which can be accompanied by arrhythmias and, in some cases, myocardial infarction. Acute heart failure is one of the consequences of small vessel thrombosis, microvascular dysfunction, or stress-induced cardiomyopathy.
Signs of cardiovascular complications in sHPS include pain in the heart region, behind the sternum, in the chest, epigastric pain radiating to the back, left shoulder, or neck, cough, shortness of breath worsening in a supine position, and progressive cyanosis.
Physical examination may reveal enhanced cardiac pulsation, expansion of the boundaries of relative cardiac dullness, arrhythmias, and pathological murmurs over the projection areas of heart valves. As sHPS progresses, heart failure typically develops.
It is recommended to analyze complaints, anamnesis, and perform an examination, percussion, and auscultation of the lungs in all patients to detect pathological changes in the respiratory system [1,3,7,177,179,180,182].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: acute respiratory distress syndrome may develop in sHLH due to microangiopathy with pulmonary vascular thrombosis. Pulmonary involvement can vary in severity, up to the development of severe respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation.
Patient mortality in pulmonary involvement is up to 88%.
Increasing respiratory failure is an alarming sign indicating inadequate control over sHLH or the addition of a superinfection.
Examination may reveal dyspnea, cyanosis, patchy percussion sound, decreased breath sounds, crepitant rales, and moist rales of various calibers, predominantly fine-bubbling.
It is recommended to analyze complaints and perform an examination, percussion, and palpation of the digestive system in all patients to identify pathological changes [1,3,7,177,179,180,182].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: upon examination, abdominal enlargement may be determined due to hepatomegaly and/or splenomegaly, and/or the presence of fluid in the abdominal cavity. Percussion and palpation reveal enlargement of the liver and/or spleen, and tenderness upon palpation across the entire abdominal surface.
Liver involvement occurs in the vast majority of patients with sHLH, ranging from an asymptomatic course with blood test abnormalities to the development of hepatic encephalopathy, severe hypocoagulation, and edema-ascites syndrome. Spontaneous onset ofveno-occlusive disease has been described.
The degree of splenic enlargement varies from marked to moderate, with splenomegaly detected only during instrumental examinations.
2.2.2. Laboratory diagnostic tests
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, red blood cell count, leukocyte count, platelet count, differential leukocyte count [leukocyte formula], and total hemoglobin level) in all patients to assess disease activity and detect pathological changes characteristic of sHLH [3,7,177,179,180,182,184].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, erythropenia, and a decreased ESR develop in sHLH.
It is recommended to determine prothrombin index, soluble fibrin monomer complexes in the blood, prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time, protein C level, protein S activity, plasminogen level, von Willebrand factor activity and properties, fibrinogen level, D-dimer concentration, and antithrombin III activity in all patients to assess the hemostatic system [17,22–24,105,177,178,180,185–189].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in sHLH, the levels of D-dimer and fibrin degradation products increase (an early preclinical sign), while the fibrinogen level decreases.
It is recommended to perform thromboelastography in all patients to assess the severity of hemostatic disorders and the risk of thrombosis/bleeding/disseminated intravascular coagulation [25,28,29,190,191].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: in sHLH, thromboelastography reveals signs of hypercoagulation, and hypocoagulation upon the development of consumption coagulopathy. Thromboelastography data are necessary to determine anticoagulant therapy tactics and monitor its efficacy.
It is recommended to determine blood heparin levels in all patients to assess the severity of hemostatic disorders and the risk of thrombosis/bleeding [1,3,7,17,26,27,192]
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to measure total protein, albumin, total bilirubin, free and conjugated bilirubin, creatinine, urea, uric acid, glucose, ferritin, triglycerides, cholesterol, sodium, potassium, total calcium, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase, serum iron, creatine kinase, pancreatic amylase, and lipase in all patients to identify pathological changes characteristic of sHLH [3,7,177,178,180,181,184,188,193,194].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: sHLH is characterized by elevated serum ferritin, triglycerides, ALT, AST, LDH, hyperbilirubinemia, hyponatremia, hypochloremia, and hypoalbuminemia.
Elevated levels of creatinine, uric acid, and urea indicate the development of acute kidney injury associated with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (sHLH-AKI)
It is recommended to measure serum C-reactive protein in all patients to assess sHLH activity [3,7,177,178,180,181,184,188,193,194].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: serum C-reactive protein levels are significantly elevated in sHLH.
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) blood test for sterility, microbiological (culture) test of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal mucus for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, microbiological (culture) urine test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic microorganisms, and microbiological (culture) stool test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms with antimicrobial susceptibility testing in all patients to detect active bacterial and/or fungal infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [1,180,181,188,195–198].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine class A, M, and G antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci in the blood; antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in the blood; antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae in the blood; and class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the blood in all patients to detect/exclude active mycoplasma and/or chlamydial infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [1,3,7,47,180,188,196–198].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to detect Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/exclude active mycoplasma infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [1,81,181,195,196,199–202].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative Epstein-Barr virus DNA testing in peripheral and cord blood by PCR, qualitative Epstein-Barr virus DNA testing in oropharyngeal mucosal swabs by PCR, and qualitative Epstein-Barr virus DNA testing in urine by PCR in all patients to detect/exclude active herpesvirus infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [1,68–70,72–74,81,181,195,196,203,204].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative Cytomegalovirus DNA testing in peripheral and cord blood by PCR, qualitative Cytomegalovirus DNA testing in oropharyngeal mucosal swabs by PCR, and qualitative Cytomegalovirus DNA testing in urine by PCR in all patients to detect/exclude active herpesvirus infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [1,70,72,75,78,79,81,82,180,181,188,195,196].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA testing in the blood by PCR, qualitative Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA testing in oropharyngeal mucosal swabs by PCR, and qualitative Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA testing in urine by PCR in all patients to detect/exclude active herpesvirus infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [1,7,70,72,73,80,81,181,195,196,205,206].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Cytomegalovirus in the blood of all patients to detect/exclude active cytomegalovirus infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [7,81,82,180,188].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of all patients to detect/exclude active Epstein-Barr virus infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [69,75,78,180,188,195,196].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to the capsid antigen (VCA) of Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of all patients to detect/exclude active Epstein-Barr virus infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [69,75,78,180,188,195,196].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine class G antibodies (IgG) to early antigens (EA) of Epstein-Barr virus in the blood of all patients to detect/exclude active Epstein-Barr virus infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [69,75,78,180,188,195,196].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Herpes simplex virus in the blood of all patients to detect/exclude active herpesvirus infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [7,80,87,180,188,195,207].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) examination of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms using automated inoculation with antimicrobial susceptibility testing when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected on chest computed tomography to identify the etiological factor of lung lesion [180,188,208,209].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to detect Epstein-Barr virus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/exclude active Epstein-Barr virus infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [179,180,208–211].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to detect Cytomegalovirus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/exclude active cytomegalovirus infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [179,180,208–211].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA testing in sputum, endotracheal aspirate, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/exclude active pneumocystis infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [75,180,195,212–217].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies to Pneumocystis jirovecii in the blood when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/exclude active pneumocystis infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [180,181,195,212,218,219].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis cysts (Pneumocystis carinii) when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/exclude active pneumocystis infection as a triggering factor of sHLH [75,180,188,195,212–217,220,221].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeast and mold) when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/exclude mycosis as a triggering factor of sHLH [188,195,208,213,222,223].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine Candida albicans mannan antigen and Aspergillus spp. galactomannan antigen in blood serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/exclude aspergillosis as a triggering factor of sHLH [195,208,213,222,223].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine Candida albicans mannan antigen and Aspergillus spp. galactomannan antigen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected on chest computed tomography to detect/exclude aspergillosis as a triggering factor of sHLH [195,208,213,222,223].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to measure blood procalcitonin levels in all patients to rule out sepsis [40,103,105,180,188].
(Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: an elevated procalcitonin level should raise suspicion of a superimposed infection and the development of sepsis.
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count and urinalysis, determine urine albumin, and measure daily urine protein excretion [3,7,177,179,180,182,184,224].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: tubular necrosis is the predominant form of renal injury in macrophage activation syndrome-associated acute kidney injury (MAS-AKI). However, histopathological changes may also include interstitial inflammation, glomerular abnormalities, microscopic lesions, and thrombotic microangiopathy. Patients with MAS-AKI typically present with oliguria, azotemia, and nephrotic syndrome. Urinalysis reveals proteinuria of varying severity, macroscopic and microscopic hematuria, and cylindruria.
2.2.3. Instrumental diagnostic procedures
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive ultrasound examination (ultrasound) of internal organs (including a comprehensive ultrasound of the abdominal organs and an ultrasound of the kidneys) in all patients to detect renal involvement, progressive hepatosplenomegaly, and intra-abdominal lymphadenopathy [1,3,7,180,188,225,226].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform echocardiography in all patients to assess cardiac status [1,3,7,180,184,188].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram in all patients to assess cardiac function [1,3,7,180,188,227].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the chest organs with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in all patients to detect/rule out pulmonary involvement [1,3,7,180,188,225].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: MAS may be complicated by hemorrhagic alveolitis, alveolar and interstitial pulmonary edema of the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) type; pneumonia (focal, lobar, interstitial, polysegmental) may also be detected.
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients with neurological symptoms to detect brain involvement [1,3,7,180,188,225,228].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: HLH may manifest with ischemic/hemorrhagic strokes, well-defined demyelinating lesions, and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES).
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal cavity, retroperitoneal space, and pelvic organs with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in the event of multiple organ failure in all patients to detect organomegaly, free fluid in the abdominal and pelvic cavities, and to assess the condition of the liver, kidney, and splenic parenchyma [1,3,7,177,180,188,229].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to obtain a bone marrow cytological preparation by puncture with anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) and a bone marrow histological preparation along with a bone marrow smear cytological examination (myelogram), and pathological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material in all patients to detect differentiated macrophages phagocytosing hematopoietic cells [1,3,7,180,188,230,231].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: bone marrow aplasia may develop in severe HFS.
2.2.4. Other diagnostic procedures
It is recommended to perform an initial neurological consultation (examination) in patients with neurological symptoms to assess the state of the central and peripheral nervous system [1,3,7,180,188].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: 30–35% of patients develop symptoms of central nervous system involvement; seizures, meningism, depressed level of consciousness, cranial nerve palsy, psychomotor agitation, ataxia, hypotonia, irritability.
In half of the patients with neuropsychiatric symptoms, cerebrospinal fluid analysis reveals pleocytosis, hyperproteinorachia (elevated CSF protein levels), and hemophagocytic cells.
Peripheral neuropathy and marked generalized weakness, disproportionate to the degree of anemia, are also encountered.
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for patients scheduled for procedures under general anesthesia in order to assess their status [30,31,165,166].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: prior to all procedures requiring anesthesia/sedation, an examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-reanimatologist is required.
It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-reanimatologist in patients in severe/critical condition to address the issue of transfer to the intensive care unit [30,31,165,167].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to provide 24-hour monitoring by an anesthesiologist-reanimatologist for patients with pancytopenia, single-organ or multiple-organ failure, and central nervous system involvement in order to provide care in an intensive care setting [30,31,165,167].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial ophthalmological consultation (examination) in patients with hemorrhagic syndrome to assess the refractive media and membranes of the eye, optic nerve, retina, and fundus [1,3,7,180,188,232–234].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: patients with MAS may exhibit retinal hemorrhages, optic neuritis, and uveal infiltration.
2.2.5. Criteria for diagnosing secondary hemophagocytic syndrome.
A. Ravelli et al. criteria [235]:
Serum ferritin concentration >684 ng/ml combined with a febrile fever and 2 of the following:
- blood platelet count ≤180×109/l;
- serum AST concentration >48 IU/L;
- serum triglyceride concentration >1.75 mmol/L;
- blood fibrinogen concentration ≤3.60 g/L.
2.2.6. Personalized diagnostic algorithm for secondary hemophagocytic syndrome in patients with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis
All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sJIA who present with a febrile fever require:
Evaluation of the following clinical parameters:
- fever, rash, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, myalgia, hemorrhagic syndrome, central nervous system involvement (seizures, paresthesia, confusion, cranial or peripheral neuropathy), renal, pulmonary, and cardiac involvement.
Evaluation of the results of the following tests:
- laboratory tests: hemoglobin level, absolute red blood cell count, white blood cell count, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts, ESR, ALT, AST, GGT, LDH activity, serum creatinine, urea, CRP, ferritin, triglycerides, PCT, total protein and albumin concentrations, blood electrolyte profile (sodium, potassium, chlorides, iron), glomerular filtration rate (in case of worsening azotemia), blood clotting parameters (Quick's prothrombin, thrombin time, prothrombin time, INR, APTT, D-dimer, fibrinogen, fibrin monomer, von Willebrand factor, protein S, protein C);
- instrumental tests – ECG, echocardiography, ultrasound of the abdominal organs, kidneys, chest CT, abdominal MRI, brain MRI;
- microbiological tests of blood, urine, nasopharyngeal mucus, intestinal discharge;
- molecular biological tests using PCR to determine DNA of viruses from the Herpesviridae family (cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2). After analyzing the clinical data and test results described above, patients must have their diagnosis of MAS verified according to the 2016 criteria by A. Ravelli et al. (see section 2.3) and immunosuppressive therapy initiated in accordance with the treatment algorithm for systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis with hemophagocytic syndrome (see section 3.1.2).
Monitoring early markers of MAS development [236]:
All patients with sJIA require monitoring of early markers of MAS development:
Early clinical markers of secondary HPS:
- Lymphadenopathy
Early instrumental markers of secondary HPS:
- Decreased blood red blood cell count <4.34 million/µl
- Decreased blood platelet count <208 thousand/µl
- Decreased blood chloride concentration <101.9 mmol/l
- Increased serum LDH activity >412 IU/l
If early markers of MAS development are identified, immunosuppressive therapy must be initiated in accordance with the treatment algorithm for systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis with hemophagocytic syndrome (see section 3.1.2).
2.3 Evaluation of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the active disease stage for the purpose of prescribing/adjusting therapy
It is recommended to conduct an evaluation in a rheumatology inpatient setting for all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sJIA in the active stage for the purpose of prescribing/adjusting therapy [1,3,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
It is recommended to prescribe pathogenetic therapy to all patients after diagnostics, including differential diagnosis, and establishment/confirmation of the diagnosis of sJIA in a rheumatology inpatient setting [1,3,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to switch to another selective immunosuppressant (JAK inhibitor) and/or generic drug exclusively for medical indications; automatic switching is not recommended in order to maintain disease remission and prevent the occurrence of adverse events [278–280].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to switch to another biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and/or biosimilar exclusively for medical indications; automatic switching is not recommended in order to maintain disease remission, prevent the formation of neutralizing antibodies, and avoid adverse events [278–280].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: biosimilars of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors, as well as generic JAK inhibitors that are structurally equivalent, are currently approved. Some of these drugs have demonstrated efficacy similar to the original drugs in clinical trials in adult patients [281]. However, clinical trials of biosimilars and selective immunosuppressants have not been conducted in the pediatric population with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
The original selective immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD cannot be automatically substituted with a generic drug or biosimilar. Drug substitution may only be carried out based on a consensus of the attending physician who initiated therapy with the selective immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD, after obtaining informed consent from the parents and children over 15 years of age.
3.1 Conservative Treatment
3.1.1 Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with active systemic manifestations and varying degrees of arthritis activity
It is recommended to prescribe NSAID monotherapy (M01A) for a duration of no more than 1 month at the diagnostic stage for patients with an unconfirmed diagnosis of sJIA in order to achieve an anti-inflammatory effect [1,3,7,282–289].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe NSAIDs (M01A) to relieve fever and pain in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sJIA in order to achieve an anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antipyretic effect [1,3,7,282–290].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the following NSAID administration regimens are used:
— diclofenac** (M01AB) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— nimesulide (M01AX) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— meloxicam (M01AC) in accordance with the drug's instructions for use, or
— ibuprofen** (M01AE01) in accordance with the instructions for medical use [1,3,7,282–289]. (CLE 5, LER C)
Diclofenac** (M01AB) is used in children from 6 years of age in tablets and suppositories; intramuscular injections are approved from 18 years of age.
Nimesulide (M01AX) is used in children from 2 years of age as a suspension, and over 12 years of age as tablets.
Meloxicam (M01AC) is used in children from 2 years of age as a suspension, over 15 years of age in tablets; intramuscular injections are approved from 18 years of age.
Ibuprofen** (M01AE01) is used in children over 3 months of age as a suspension and over 6 years of age as tablets, with dosing intervals of 6–8 hours.
#Diclofenac** (M01AB), #nimesulide (M01AX), #meloxicam (M01AC) off-label use is prescribed by decision of the medical committee, after obtaining informed consent from the parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is not recommended to prescribe glucocorticoids (H02AB) orally and/or intravenously, and/or intra-articularly, and/or immunosuppressants (methotrexate**, #leflunomide**), and/or bDMARDs (tocilizumab** or canakinumab**, or anakinra** or #adalimumab**, or #etanercept**, or #golimumab**, or #rituximab** or #abatacept**), and/or selective immunosuppressants (#tofacitinib** or #upadacitinib**) before completing a full laboratory and instrumental workup, ruling out oncological and oncohematological diseases, and establishing a diagnosis of sJIA (see sections 2, 3) [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the use of GCs, immunosuppressants (methotrexate** or #leflunomide**), bDMARDs (tocilizumab** or canakinumab**, or anakinra**, or #adalimumab**, or #etanercept**, or golimumab**, or #rituximab**, or #abatacept**), selective immunosuppressants (#tofacitinib** or #upadacitinib**) in oncological and oncohematological diseases mimicking sJIA will significantly hinder subsequent diagnosis verification, as they have a pronounced immunosuppressive effect and mask the clinical and morphological presentation of malignant neoplasms.
It is recommended to prescribe glucocorticoids (H02AB) for life-threatening systemic manifestations (persistent febrile or hectic fever and/or carditis, and/or pneumonitis, and/or serositis) to achieve a rapid anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effect [1,3,6,7,291].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to administer pulse therapy with #methylprednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose of 10–30 mg/kg/administration intravenously for 3, and if necessary 5 consecutive days, for life-threatening systemic manifestations (persistent febrile/hectic fever, serositis, mono-/polyorgan failure) to achieve a rapid anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effect [1,3,6,7,291].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: pulse therapy with #methylprednisolone** (H02AB) is prescribed by decision of the medical committee, after obtaining informed consent from the parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe #prednisolone** (H02AB) orally at a dose of 1–1.5–2 mg/kg/day or #methylprednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose equivalent to prednisolone (not exceeding 60 mg/day), followed by a gradual taper to a maintenance dose (0.2–0.3 mg/kg/day) in patients with refractory or complicated sJIA (including the presence of serositis and/or lung involvement) to achieve a rapid anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effect [1,3,7,291–297].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the duration of the maximum dose is 4–8 weeks, after which the dose is gradually and slowly tapered to maintenance. If a disease flare develops, the dose of #prednisolone** or #methylprednisolone** may be increased to the maximum.
To minimize GC side effects, administration of #prednisolone** or #methylprednisolone** is not recommended to be continued for longer than 6 months [293].
It is recommended to perform intra-articular administration of:
— betamethasone** (H02AB) in children over 3 years of age in accordance with the instructions for use, or
— #triamcinolone (H02AB) for children over 12 years of age at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg (maximum dose 80 mg) when administered into the knee joints, 0.5–1 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the ankle and elbow joints, and 0.3–0.5 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) into the wrist joints, small joints of the hands and feet [298–300]
for patients with active mono- or oligoarthritis no more than once every 4 months for the purpose of rapidly relieving the inflammatory process in the joints [1,3,7,291,298–302]. (UBD 5, GRS C)
Comments: if arthritis flares frequently (more often than once every 4 months), intra-articular GC administration is not performed. Indications for intra-articular GC administration are pronounced exudative changes and pain syndrome in the affected joints.
#Betamethasone** (H02AB) and #triamcinolone outside of age-related indications are prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe methotrexate** at a dose of 15 mg/m2/week subcutaneously (no more than 25 mg/week) once a week (L01BA) in the presence of active arthritis for the purpose of inducing arthritis remission [1,3,7,293,305–307].
(LoE 2, GoR B)
Comments: methotrexate** (L01BA) is prescribed for active oligo-polyarthritis. The subcutaneous route of administration for methotrexate** (L01BA) is preferred due to higher bioavailability.
Methotrexate** (L01BA) is preferably used in graduated syringes (here and hereinafter).
Outside of age-related indications, #methotrexate** (L01BA) is prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5
It is recommended to prescribe #folic acid** (B03BB) at a dose of 1 mg every day except on the day of methotrexate administration or 2.5–7.5 mg once a week orally during the period of methotrexate** (L01BA) administration for the purpose of preventing its adverse effects [1,3,7,305,308–311]
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to switch to #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) in case of intolerance and/or inefficacy of oral methotrexate** (L01BA) in children with active arthritis with a body weight <20 kg – 10 mg once daily every other day; children with a body weight of 20–40 kg – 10 mg daily; children with a body weight >40 kg – 20 mg daily for the purpose of maintaining/inducing disease remission [1,3,7,114,312,313].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: #Leflunomide** (L04FFAA) is prescribed for life-saving indications, by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5
It is recommended to prescribe tocilizumab** (L04AC) as monotherapy or in combination with oral and/or intravenous GCs in the absence of active arthritis for the purpose of inducing remission of sJIA:
— in children with body weight <30 kg – at a dose of 12 mg/kg/administration, in children with body weight ≥30 kg – at a dose of 8 mg/kg/administration intravenously once every 2 weeks. (UBD 1, GRS B)
or
— in children with body weight <30 kg at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks, in children with body weight ≥30 kg – at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once a week. (UBD 3, GRS B)
for the purpose of inducing remission of sJIA [296,314–320].
Comments: in children younger than 2 years of age, #tocilizumab** (L04AC) in the intravenous formulation, or in children younger than 1 year of age, #tocilizumab** (L04AC) in the subcutaneous formulation is prescribed for life-saving indications, by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5
It is recommended to prescribe tocilizumab** (L04AC) in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), with or without oral and/or intravenous GCs in the presence of active arthritis for the purpose of inducing remission of sJIA:
— in children with body weight <30 kg – at a dose of 12 mg/kg/administration, in children with body weight ≥30 kg – at a dose of 8 mg/kg/administration intravenously, intravenously once every 2 weeks.
or
— in children with body weight <30 kg at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks, in children with body weight ≥30 kg – at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once a week.
to induce remission of sJIA [6,291,292,296,314–320] (for intravenous tocilizumab** combined with methotrexate** – LoE 1, GoR B; for subcutaneous tocilizumab** combined with methotrexate** – LoE 3, GoR B; for intravenous and subcutaneous tocilizumab** combined with #leflunomide** – LoE 5, GoR C).
Comments: in children younger than 2 years of age, #tocilizumab** (L04AC) in the intravenous formulation, or in children younger than 1 year of age, #tocilizumab** (L04AC) in the subcutaneous formulation is prescribed for life-saving indications, by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5.
It is recommended to prescribe canakinumab** (L04AC) at a dose of 4 mg/kg/administration subcutaneously every 4 weeks as monotherapy or in combination with oral and/or intravenous GCs in the absence of active arthritis to induce remission of sJIA [296,316–318,321–323].
(Level of Evidence 1, Grade of Recommendation B)
Comments: in children under 2 years of age, #canakinumab** (L04AC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5.
It is recommended to prescribe canakinumab** (L04AC) at a dose of 4 mg/kg/administration subcutaneously every 4 weeks in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA), with or without oral and/or intravenous GCs in the presence of active arthritis to induce remission of sJIA [6,291,292,296,316–318,321–323]. (for regimens using canakinumab in combination with methotrexate** – LoE 1, GoR B; for regimens using canakinumab** in combination with #leflunomide** – LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in children under 2 years of age, #canakinumab** (L04AC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5.
It is recommended to prescribe anakinra** (L04AC) to children with a body weight ≥50 kg at a dose of 100 mg/day subcutaneously daily; to children with a body weight <50 kg at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg/day subcutaneously daily as monotherapy or in combination with oral and/or intravenous GCs in the absence of active arthritis to induce remission of sJIA [6,291,292,324,325].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in children under 8 months of age and with a body weight less than 10 kg, #anakinra** (L04AC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5.
It is recommended to prescribe anakinra** (L04AC) to children with a body weight ≥50 kg at a dose of 100 mg/day subcutaneously daily; to children with a body weight <50 kg at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg/day subcutaneously daily with or without methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) with or without oral and/or intravenous GCs in the presence of active arthritis to induce remission of sJIA [6,291,292,324,325].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in children under 8 months of age and with a body weight less than 10 kg, #anakinra** (L04AC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5.
It is recommended to switch to a genetically engineered biologic drug with a different mechanism of action if the patient fails to achieve a 50% improvement according to the ACR pediatric criteria at 3 months, or the inactive disease state according to the C. Wallace criteria at 6 months, or at any stage of treatment in case of persistent fever or increasing disease activity during monotherapy with tocilizumab** (L04AC), canakinumab** (L04AC), or anakinra** (L04AC), or in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) [3,6,7,291,292,317,326].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to switch to a genetically engineered biologic drug with a different mechanism of action at any stage of treatment in case of intolerance to tocilizumab** (L04AC), canakinumab** (L04AC), or anakinra** (L04AC) [6,291,292,294,296,313,316–318,321].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe canakinumab** (L04AC) at a dose of 4 mg/kg/administration subcutaneously every 4 weeks or anakinra** (L04AC) to children with a body weight ≥50 kg at a dose of 100 mg/day subcutaneously daily; to children with a body weight <50 kg at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg/day subcutaneously daily with or without methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) in case of inefficacy and/or intolerance to tocilizumab** (L04AC) to induce/maintain remission of sJIA [6,16,291,292,294,296,316–318,321,322].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in children under 2 years of age, #canakinumab** (L04AC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
In children under 8 months of age and with a body weight less than 10 kg, #anakinra** (L04AC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5.
It is recommended to prescribe tocilizumab** (L04AC) in children with body weight ≥ 30 kg at a dose of 8 mg/kg/administration intravenously once every 2 weeks or at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once a week; in children with body weight <30 kg at a dose of 12 mg/kg/administration intravenously or 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks with or without methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) in case of inefficacy and/or intolerance to canakinumab** (L04AC) or anakinra** (L04AC) to induce/maintain remission of sJIA [6,291,292,296,316–318,321,322]. (for regimens using tocilizumab** in subcutaneous and intravenous formulations combined with methotrexate** – LoE 4, GoR C; for regimens using tocilizumab** in subcutaneous and intravenous formulations combined with #leflunomide** – LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in children under 2 years of age, #tocilizumab** (L04AC) intravenous formulation, or in children under 1 year of age, #tocilizumab** (L04AC) subcutaneous formulation is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5.
It is recommended to prescribe #rituximab** (L01XC) at a dose of 375 mg/m2 of body surface area intravenously once a week for 4 consecutive weeks in case of inefficacy/intolerance of monotherapy with tocilizumab** (L04AC), canakinumab** (L04AC), or anakinra** (L04AC), or in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA), or with #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) in order to maintain/induce remission of sJIA [3,6,291,292,317,318,327–331]. (for regimens using tocilizumab**, canakinumab**, anakinra**, or #rituximab** in combination with methotrexate** — LoE 4, GoR C; for regimens using tocilizumab**, canakinumab**, anakinra**, or #rituximab** in combination with #leflunomide** — LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #rituximab** is prescribed in case of persistence of systemic manifestations and/or failure of the patient to achieve a 50% improvement according to the ACR pediatric criteria at 3 months, or the inactive disease state according to the C. Wallace criteria at 6 months during treatment with a second/third biologic DMARD (tocilizumab** (L04AC), canakinumab** (L04AC), or anakinra** (L04AC)) combined with (or without) methotrexate** or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) [326].
Courses of #rituximab** (L01XC) therapy (4 infusions over 4 consecutive weeks) are administered every 22–24 weeks if disease activity persists, taking into account infectious and non-infectious complications. If the inactive disease state/remission is not achieved after the 3rd course of #rituximab** (L01XC) treatment, rituximab therapy should be discontinued.
#Rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5.
It is recommended to prescribe #rituximab** (L01XC) in combination with #co-trimoxazole** (J01EE) at a dose of 5 mg/kg trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily for the prevention of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in accordance with international guidelines [3,7,217,243,332].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to switch to tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors (L04AB) in case of remission of systemic manifestations lasting for at least one year and recurrent arthritis during therapy with tocilizumab** (L04AC), canakinumab** (L04AC), or anakinra** (L04AC) combined with methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04FFAA) to maintain/induce remission of sJIA [333–342]. (for regimens using tocilizumab**, canakinumab**, anakinra**, or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors combined with methotrexate** – LoE 1, GoR A; for regimens using tocilizumab**, canakinumab**, anakinra**, or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors combined with #leflunomide** – LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5.
It is recommended to prescribe:
— #adalimumab** (L04AB) for children ≥2 years of age with a body weight of 15–30 kg at a dose of 20 mg; with a body weight >30 kg at a dose of 40 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks [343].
— or #etanercept** (L04AB) at a dose of 0.2–0.4 mg/kg/administration 2 times a week or 0.8 mg/kg/administration once a week [343,344],
— or #golimumab** (L04AB) for children ≥2 years at a dose of 30 mg/m2 (maximum 50 mg) subcutaneously once every 4 weeks [333,345]
in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04AA13), or as monotherapy for the purpose of induction/maintenance of remission in sJIA [333–338,343–345]
(Level of Evidence 5, Grade of Recommendation C).
Comments: monoclonal antibodies to TNF-alpha (#adalimumab**, #golimumab**) (L04AB) are preferably prescribed in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide** to reduce the risk of neutralizing antibodies formation.
For doses and administration schedule of methotrexate** (L01BA) and #leflunomide** (L04AA13), see above.
Off-label, #adalimumab** (L04AB), #etanercept** (L04AB), and #golimumab** (L04AB) are prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents [313].
The indication for use in children and adolescents with juvenile arthritis aged 2 to 17 years and with a body mass of less than 62.5 kg applies only to the medicinal product etanercept** "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection". The medicinal product etanercept** "solution for subcutaneous injection" has a contraindication for use: childhood under 12 years of age and body mass less than 62.5 kg [346–349].
According to the FAS clarification letter No. TN/109573/21 dated 22.12.2021 and medical instructions for the use of the medicinal product Etanercept** [350]:
the use of the dosage form "solution for subcutaneous injection" instead of "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection" in children under 12 years of age and body mass less than 62.5 kg is not recognized as acceptable due to differences in the final concentration of solutions and the lack of studies allowing to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of the 50 mg/ml solution in children. Thus, the substitution of the dosage form "lyophilisate for solution for subcutaneous injection" in this patient is impossible.
For the treatment of patients with sJIA, it is advisable to use the medicinal product adalimumab** citrate-free formulation 40 mg/0.4 ml in order to avoid causing children unjustified pain that develops when using the medicinal product adalimumab** citrate-containing formulation 40 mg/0.8 ml [351–355].
Taking into account the pronounced pain syndrome when using the medicinal product adalimumab** citrate-containing formulation 40 mg/0.8 ml, the use of this formulation in pediatric patients is impossible [351–355].
It is recommended to additionally prescribe #tofacitinib** (L04AA29) at a dose of 2.5–5 mg 2 times/day orally to patients with refractory sJIA (with active systemic manifestations and/or arthritis) in combination with tocilizumab** (L04AC) or canakinumab** (L04AC), or anakinra** (L04AC), or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors (L04AB) with or without methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04AA13) for the purpose of induction/maintenance of sJIA remission [6,291,292,356,357]. (for regimens using #tofacitinib** in combination with tocilizumab** or canakinumab**, or anakinra**, or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors in combination with methotrexate** – LoE 2, GoR B; for regimens using #tofacitinib** in combination with tocilizumab** or canakinumab**, or anakinra**, or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors in combination with #leflunomide** – LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #tofacitinib** (L04AA29) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5
It is recommended to prescribe #upadacitinib** (L04AA) to patients over 12 years of age, with a body mass ≥40 kg at a dose of 15 mg/day orally in patients with refractory sJIA (with active systemic manifestations and/or arthritis) receiving therapy with tocilizumab** (L04AC) or canakinumab** (L04AC), or anakinra** (L04AC), or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors (L04AB) in combination with methotrexate** (L01BA) or with/without #leflunomide** for the purpose of induction/maintenance of sJIA remission [6,291,292,358]. (for regimens using #upadacitinib** in combination with methotrexate** – LoE 4, GoR C; for regimens using #upadacitinib** in combination with #leflunomide** – LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #upadacitinib** (L04AA44) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5
It is recommended to prescribe #abatacept** (L04AA) at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration at weeks 0, 2, 4, then every 4 weeks in patients with refractory articular syndrome without active systemic manifestations receiving therapy with tocilizumab** (L04AC) or canakinumab** (L04AC), or anakinra** (L04AC), or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors (L04AB), or #tofacitinib** (L04AA29), or #upadacitinib** (L04AA) with or without methotrexate** (L01BA) or #leflunomide** (L04AA13) for the purpose of induction/maintenance of sJIA remission [6,291,292,359–361]. (for regimens using #abatacept** in combination with methotrexate** – LoE 2, GoR B; for regimens using #abatacept** in combination with #leflunomide** – LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #abatacept** (L04AA44) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5
It is recommended to monitor the efficacy of any medicinal product used for pathogenetic therapy after 3 and 6 months, and then every 6 months of therapy (the drug is effective upon achieving 50% improvement according to ACRpedi criteria at 3 months, or inactive disease stage at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria) [1,317,362].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to correct therapy (switching drugs) until efficacy or minimal/low disease activity is achieved in patients with a long-standing disease, regardless of the drug used [1,317,362].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
3.1.2. Systemic-onset juvenile arthritis with hemophagocytic syndrome
It is recommended to prescribe and conduct therapy in a rheumatological hospital setting after diagnostics, including differential diagnostics, and establishing/confirming the diagnosis of sJIA with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) in all patients to ensure the possibility of prevention and timely relief of severe complications [1,363].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe targeted etiotropic therapy with systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) and/or systemic antifungal drugs (J02A), and/or systemic antiviral drugs (J05) in patients with a known etiological infectious factor in order to stop the activation of the innate immune system [1,180,188,195].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe glucocorticoids (H02AB) in combination with #cyclosporine** (L04AD01) and #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA02) in all patients to relieve MAS [177,180,188,193,364–366].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform pulse therapy with #methylprednisolone** (H02AB) at a dose of 20–30 mg/kg/administration intravenously or prescribe #dexamethasone** (H02AB) at a dose of 10–20 mg/m²/day intravenously in all patients to relieve MAS [177,188,193,364–367].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #dexamethasone** (H02AB) and #cyclosporine** (L04AD01) are prescribed for vital indications by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to gradually taper the dose of intravenous GCs after the resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of MAS according to the following regimens:
— #dexamethasone** (H02AB) starting from an initial dose of 10–20 mg/m2/day for 1–2 weeks, 5–10 mg/m2/day for 3–4 weeks, 2.5–5 mg/m3/day for 5–6 weeks, 1.25–2.5 mg/m4/day for 7–8 weeks;
— #methylprednisolone** starting from an initial dose of 20–30 mg/kg/administration for 3–5 days with a dose reduction of 25% once every 2–3 days to prevent withdrawal syndrome [1,188,363,364,366,368–371].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe #cyclosporine** at a dose of 3–5 mg/kg/day intravenously or orally to all patients to relieve MAS [177,180,188,193,364–366,368,372].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to prescribe #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA02) at a dose of 1–2 g/kg/course over 2 days intravenously to all patients to achieve an immunosuppressive effect and relieve MAS [188,193,366,368,373,374].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: administration of the full course dose of #normal human immunoglobulin** is carried out via continuous prolonged infusion as a single dose to ensure blockade of IgG Fc receptors on phagocytic cells; suppression of T-lymphocyte proliferation and immunoglobulin production; interaction with the complement system; blockade of cytokine activation and action; and blockade of adhesion molecule expression on endothelial cells.
#Normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to evaluate the effectiveness of the applied HFS treatment regimen in accordance with the criteria for achieving a therapeutic response (resolution of fever, reduction in spleen size, increase in blood platelet count ≥100×109/L, normalization of blood fibrinogen level, reduction of serum ferritin concentration by 25%) every 48 hours to address the issue of continuing/changing the induction therapy regimen [180,188].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: upon achieving a response, therapy should be continued until the inactive disease stage is reached.
It is recommended to prescribe #anakinra** (L04AC) at a dose of 5–10 mg/kg/day intravenously in 2 divided doses for 3–10 days, if necessary longer in case of increasing HFS activity in the first 48 hours of GC therapy, in combination with #cyclosporine** (L04AD) and #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) to relieve HFS [180,188,375–380].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: #anakinra** (L04AC) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended, in case of inefficacy of the combination of #anakinra** (L04AC) with GCs, #cyclosporine** (L04AD), and #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA), to additionally prescribe:
— #ruxolitinib** orally
for children weighing up to 10 kg – 2.5 mg × 2 times/day;
for children weighing from 10 to 25 kg – 5 mg × 2 times/day;
for children weighing >25 kg – 10 mg × 2 times/day (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
— or #tofacitinib** (L04AA) orally at a dose of 10 mg × 2 times/day to relieve HFS [188,381,382]. (Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: #ruxolitinib** and #tofacitinib** are prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
Switching to #rituximab** (L01XC) at a dose of 375 mg/m2 weekly intravenously for 1-4 consecutive weeks is recommended if the combination of #anakinra** (L04AC) with corticosteroids, #ciclosporin** (L04AD), #human normal immunoglobulin** (J06BA) and #ruxolitinib** or #tofacitinib** (L04AA) is ineffective for the management of HLH [188,368,383].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: #rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed for vital indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe #co-trimoxazole** (JO1EE) at a dose of 5 mg/kg calculated by trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily in combination with #rituximab** (L01XC) for the prevention of Pneumocystis pneumonia [3,7,217,243,384].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe #prednisolone** at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg orally or #methylprednisolone** (HO2AB) at a dose equivalent to prednisolone, in case of inefficacy of combined HFS therapy or HFS reactivation against the background of tapering/discontinuation of intravenous GCs to relieve HFS [177,180,188,193,385].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to prescribe #acyclovir** (JO5AB) to children aged <1 year at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 8 hours; to children aged ≥1 year at a dose of 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 8 hours upon the development of Herpes zoster infection to suppress the HFS trigger factor [3,7,157,386–389].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe #acyclovir** (JO5AB) at a dose of 5–10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 8 hours for 7–10 days upon confirmation of active infection caused by Herpes simplex virus to suppress the HFS trigger factor [3,7,387,390].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #acyclovir** (JO5AB) for children <3 years of age is prescribed by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents.
Treatment is carried out until complete relief of herpetic infection.
It is recommended to prescribe #ganciclovir** (J05AB) at a dose of 6 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days upon confirmation of active cytomegalovirus infection to suppress the triggering factor of HPS [3,391–394].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #Ganciclovir** (J05AB) in children <12 years of age is prescribed by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from parents and approval from the local ethics committee of the medical organization.
It is recommended to prescribe #ganciclovir** (J05AB) at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days upon confirmation of active Epstein-Barr virus infection to suppress the triggering factor of MAS [3, 7, 395].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #Ganciclovir** (J05AB) in children <12 years of age is prescribed by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from parents and approval from the local ethics committee of the medical organization.
It is recommended to prescribe #rituximab** as a first-line biological DMARD in combination with #cyclosporine**, #normal human immunoglobulin**, and #sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim** in active Epstein-Barr virus infection to suppress virus replication in B-lymphocytes and relieve HPS [3,7,193,396].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments:
Regimens:
— #rituximab** (L01XC) – at a dose of 375 mg/m2/week intravenously for 1–4 consecutive weeks [396];
— #cyclosporine** (L04AD) – 3–5 mg/kg/day [193,396];
— #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) – 1–2 g/kg/course over 2 days [193,396];
— #sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim** (J01EE) – for administration schedule and doses of #sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim** (J01EE), see above [243,384].
#Rituximab** (L01XC) is prescribed on vital indications, by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from parents/patients over 15 years of age.
It is recommended to prescribe antithrombotic agents (B01A): heparin group drugs (B01B) or direct factor Xa inhibitors (B01AF); antiplatelet agents excluding heparin (B01AC); antifibrinolytic agents (B02A) to all patients to prevent thrombotic complications and resolve coagulopathy [17,103,105,180,185,192,397–399].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: antithrombotic agents (B01A) outside of age indications are prescribed by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children older than 15 years.
It is recommended to perform blood transfusion upon the development of consumption coagulopathy or bleeding to restore hemostatic balance [187,400].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in case of consumption coagulopathy development, blood transfusion and blood products (B05A) are administered: red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, blood coagulation factor VII, platelets, cryoprecipitate, etc., according to indications.
It is recommended to prescribe the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** (L03AA) at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously for 3–5 days (longer if necessary) when the absolute neutrophil count drops to ≤1.0×109/L to restore blood neutrophil count and prevent infectious complications [1,3,7,401,402].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe systemic anti-infectives (J01) in combination with systemic antifungals (J02A) until agranulocytosis resolves when the planned absolute neutrophil count drops to ≤1.0×109/L to prevent infectious complications [3,7,104,403,404].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe empiric systemic anti-infective therapy (J01) targeting Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic flora, and/or systemic antifungals (J02A), and/or systemic antivirals (J05) upon the development of sepsis/infectious complications before the etiologic agent is confirmed, to relieve/prevent the progression of the infectious process [47,101–105,180,188,403–407].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: systemic anti-infectives (J01), systemic antifungals (J02A), and antivirals (J05) outside of age indications are prescribed by decision of the medical panel, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children older than 15 years.
It is recommended to prescribe targeted therapy based on microflora sensitivity when the etiological factor of sepsis/infectious complication is confirmed, depending on the clinical situation, with systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) (combinations of penicillins, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (J01CR) and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins (J01DE), and/or carbapenems (J01DH), and/or other antibacterial drugs (J01XX), and/or glycopeptide antibiotics (J01XA), and/or other aminoglycosides (J01GB)), with or without systemic antifungal drugs (J02A), and/or systemic antiviral drugs (J05) to manage sepsis/infectious complication [47,101–105,180,403–406].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to treat macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) until criteria for the inactive stage are achieved (absence of fever, splenomegaly, cytopenia (Hb ≥90 g/L, platelets ≥100×109/L, neutrophils ≥0.5×109/L), blood triglycerides <3 mmol/L or <265 mg/dL, ferritin ≤500 µg/L, normalization of cerebrospinal fluid parameters (in case of CNS involvement)) to prevent the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and death [408].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: after MAS resolution, therapy is recommended to maintain remission of sJIA (see above).
3.1.3. Main principles of treatment for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (Paediatric Rheumatology European Society, PRES)
1. The main goal of treatment for patients with JIA is clinical remission – absence of symptoms of inflammatory activity, including systemic manifestations (2bC)* (see Appendices G1–G4).
2. Minimal (or low) disease activity can be an alternative goal exclusively in patients with long-standing disease (2cB)* (see Appendices G1–G5).
3. Target setting and choice of therapy should be based on the individual characteristics of the child and agreed upon with the parent/patient (5D)*.
4. Disease activity must be regularly assessed and documented using validated comprehensive instruments (2cC)* (see Appendices G1–G4).
5. The frequency of monitoring depends on the type of JIA, disease activity, and the presence of systemic manifestations (5C)*.
6. A 50% reduction in disease activity should be achieved in all patients in at least 3 months, and the target (inactive disease/remission) in 6 months of treatment. In patients with sJIA with active systemic manifestations, fever should resolve within 1 week (2bB)*.
7. Therapy should be adjusted until the target is achieved (2bC)*.
8. Monitoring should be continuous to ensure the maintenance of remission (target) (2bC)* [317].
A. The therapeutic strategy for JIA management is based on the cooperation of the parents/patient and the pediatric rheumatology team providing treatment and rehabilitation.
B. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is a heterogeneous group of diseases, which implies various therapeutic approaches.
C. The main goals of JIA treatment are control of clinical and laboratory manifestations of the disease, prevention of the progression of bone and cartilage destruction; avoidance of comorbid conditions and side effects of medications; ensuring functional activity, growth, development, high quality of life, and social adaptation of the child.
D. Cessation of the inflammatory process is a necessary condition for achieving the set goals.
E. Long-term use of systemic GCs is unacceptable for achieving the target.
F. Achieving the target requires monitoring of disease activity and adjustment of therapy [317].
* PRES criteria
3.2. Surgical treatment
It is recommended to perform joint replacement surgery using anesthetic management (including early postoperative management) in children with stage 3–4 secondary coxarthrosis, taking into account age restrictions [1,3,7,158,409].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
3.3. Non-pharmacological treatment
It is recommended to restrict the child's physical activity during periods of disease exacerbation [1,3,7,158].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: complete joint immobilization with splints is contraindicated as it contributes to the development of contractures, muscle atrophy, worsening of osteoporosis, and rapid development of ankylosis. Physical exercises help maintain joint functional activity. Cycling, swimming, and walking are beneficial. Running, jumping, and active games are undesirable. It is recommended to maintain an upright posture when walking and sitting, and to sleep on a firm mattress and a thin pillow.
Exclude psycho-emotional stress and sun exposure.
It is recommended to consume foods with a high content of calcium and vitamin D for the prevention of osteoporosis [1,3,7,272,273,292,410].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to use braces, splints, and insoles to correct orthopedic disorders [1,3,7,158].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: for static orthoses, intermittent immobilization is necessary – they should be worn or put on during free time and must be removed during the day to stimulate the muscular system during physical exercises, activities, occupational therapy, and personal hygiene. In case of pronounced osteoporosis in the thoracic and lumbar spine, a corset or posture corrector should be worn; in case of cervical spine joint involvement, a cervical collar (soft, rigid) should be worn.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
It is recommended to provide medical rehabilitation services to patients with systemic connective tissue disorders, inflammatory arthropathies, and spondyloarthropathies [3,7,292,411–427].
(LoE 2, GoR B)
Comments: performed in all patients; an individual rehabilitation program is developed; goals and objectives of rehabilitation measures are formulated based on the rehabilitation diagnosis and rehabilitation potential for a day, a week, and the entire rehabilitation period; the motor regimen and individual intensity limits of interventions applied to a patient with impaired functions are determined; an individual exercise therapy program is developed; rehabilitation methods are determined: medications, kinesiotherapy, mechanotherapy (including therapeutic mechanotherapy in water), physiotherapy, robotics, exoskeletons, information technology, psychological correction, ergotherapy; forms of medical rehabilitation are selected at various stages of its application and in various periods of the disease course (individual, group classes, telemedicine-based classes); legal representatives of children in need of medical rehabilitation are consulted and trained in home-safe rehabilitation techniques and care skills for severely ill children.
It is recommended to provide physiotherapy to patients with joint damage, muscle atrophy, and steroid myopathy once low disease activity, inactive disease stage/remission is achieved [3,7,292,411–414].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: a plan is developed, and the goal and objectives of physiotherapy in a patient with sJIA are formulated during the implementation of the individual rehabilitation program; methods of physiotherapy (electro-, magneto-, photo-, mechano-, hydro-, thermotherapy) and sanatorium-resort treatment (climatotherapy, balneotherapy, pelotherapy) are selected depending on the various periods of the disease course.
It is recommended to conduct a psychological rehabilitation school for patients with sJIA and their relatives [3,7,168,169,428].
(Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: medical rehabilitation is necessarily combined with the psychological rehabilitation of children and their parents; an individual psychological rehabilitation program and psychotherapeutic program are developed taking into account the clinical picture of the disease, identified psychological and psychosocial mechanisms of the mental disorder, clinical features, personality traits, psychotherapeutic hypothesis, and psychotherapeutic targets; psychological intervention methods (psychological therapy, psychological counseling, psychological correction, and psychological rehabilitation) are chosen; types of psychotherapy include dynamic, cognitive-behavioral, existential-humanistic, and non-mainstream modalities (art therapy, body-oriented psychotherapy, psychodrama, suggestive psychotherapy, etc.); forms of psychotherapy include individual, family/couple, group, natural environment, and milieu therapy.
It is recommended to conduct the "School for Children with Rheumatic Diseases and Their Parents" [3,7,168,169,428].
(Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: the objective of the "School" is to inform parents and children about the features, mechanisms of development, clinical picture of the disease, treatment, mechanisms of drug action, their efficacy, potential side effects; methods of medical and psychological rehabilitation, disease outcomes; vaccination, prevention of exacerbations, complications of the disease, and adverse effects of antirheumatic drugs. Training in methods for monitoring drug efficacy and safety using generally accepted rheumatologic scales and questionnaires.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
5.1. Prevention
Primary prevention has not been developed since the etiology of sJIA has not been definitively established.
It is recommended to carry out prevention of sJIA complications and exacerbations, as well as side effects of antirheumatic therapy [3,6,7,16,76,429].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: to prevent flares and complications of sJIA, long-term maintenance therapy is administered under the constant monitoring of clinical and laboratory indicators of disease activity, tailored to the patient's individual characteristics and disease variant, with adjustments made when necessary; a protective regimen is ensured (psycho-emotional and physical loads are limited; during flares, children are homeschooled and attend school only during inactive disease/remission; contacts are restricted to reduce the risk of infectious diseases); sun exposure, trips to regions with high solar radiation, and UV therapy are strictly avoided, sunscreens must be used, wearing clothing that covers the skin as much as possible and wide-brimmed hats is recommended; hypothermia is prevented; an individual vaccination approach is developed; the use of live vaccines and immunomodulators is excluded.
To reduce the risk of side effects from antirheumatic drugs, regular monitoring of clinical and laboratory safety parameters is performed; the use of medications that increase the toxicity of GCs, immunosuppressants, and bDMARDs is avoided.
It is not recommended to administer vaccination with live and live attenuated vaccines concurrently with bDMARD and immunosuppressant therapy in patients receiving bDMARDs [3,7,430,431].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the safety of such a combination has not been established. An sJIA flare may develop. There are no data on the secondary transmission of infection from patients vaccinated with live vaccines to patients receiving bDMARDs.
It is recommended to provide pre-exposure prophylaxis for novel coronavirus infection in patients aged 12 years and older with a body weight of at least 40 kg, prior to the initiation or at any stage of therapy with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs combined with or without GCs, by means of passive immunization with antiviral monoclonal antibody drugs (J06BD) [432].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to administer the 13-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (adsorbed)** to all patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), prior to prescribing or at any stage of therapy with immunosuppressants and/or biological DMARDs, with or without glucocorticoids (excluding #rituximab**), to prevent pneumococcal infection, improve treatment adherence, and prevent exacerbations in accordance with international guidelines [430,433–435].
(LoE 3, GoR B)
Comments: vaccination with the 13-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine in patients receiving tocilizumab** and canakinumab** is performed 2 weeks before the planned infusion or 2 weeks after; in patients receiving #etanercept** — 1 week before the planned injection or 1 week after; in patients receiving #adalimumab** and #golimumab** — 2 and 4 weeks before the planned injection or 2 and 4 weeks after, respectively; in patients for whom #rituximab** therapy is planned — prior to the first infusion to prevent infectious complications, improve treatment adherence, and prevent sJIA flares.
5.2. Follow-up examination of patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in an inpatient/day hospital setting following the initiation of bDMARD/immunosuppressant therapy.
The examination is performed every 3–6 months: at 3 and 6 months after initiation of therapy; thereafter every 6 months to monitor the efficacy and safety of therapy, and to detect disease complications and comorbid conditions.
For complaints and anamnesis, see section 2.1.
For physical examination, see section 2.2.
It is recommended to evaluate treatment efficacy and the safety of antirheumatic therapy in all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sJIA in a rheumatology inpatient setting at 3 months after initiation of therapy; at 6 months after initiation of therapy; and subsequently every 6 months to decide on the continuation/adjustment of therapy [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the primary treatment goal is to achieve a 50% improvement according to the American College of Rheumatology criteria at 3 months and an inactive disease state according to the C. Wallace inactive disease/remission criteria at 6 months.
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (CBC) with differential (including erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], erythrocyte count, leukocyte count, platelet count, leukocyte differential, and hemoglobin level) in all patients to assess disease activity and monitor the safety of antirheumatic drugs [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: CBC parameters should be within the normal range. Single-, bi-, or pancytopenia may indicate disease flare and/or an adverse effect of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and/or immunosuppressants.
Leukopenia most frequently develops during treatment with tocilizumab** and #rituximab**, and less commonly with other immunosuppressants and bDMARDs.
Thrombocytopenia may develop during treatment with any bDMARD and immunosuppressant.
If there is evidence of recurrent thrombocytopenia, the bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy should be adjusted.
It is recommended to suspend bDMARD infusions and/or immunosuppressant injections/administration (for 7 days) in all patients with a platelet count of ≤150>100×109/L or a neutrophil count of <1.5≥1.0×109/L on the complete blood count, in order to manage adverse events associated with therapy [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids should be continued. Repeat the complete blood count in 1 week.
It is recommended to discontinue the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD in all patients when the absolute neutrophil count drops below <1.0×109/L and/or the platelet count drops below <100×109/L on the complete blood count, in order to prevent the progression of cytopenia [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
Repeat the complete blood count in 1 week.
It is recommended to prescribe the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** (L03AA) at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously for leukopenia with an absolute neutrophil count of ≤1.0×109/L for 3–5 days (or longer if necessary) until leukocyte and neutrophil counts completely normalize [1,3,6,7,401,402,404].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** (L03AA) at 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously in combination with systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) intravenously for febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) with an absolute neutrophil count of ≤1.0×109/L [1,3,6,7,401,402,404].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
Treatment with #filgrastim** (L03AA) is carried out for 3–5 days (or longer if necessary) until complete normalization of leukocyte and neutrophil counts.
It is recommended to continue treatment with systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) in all patients with febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) to resolve the fever and normalize the leukocyte differential on the complete blood count [1,3,6,7,401,402,404].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to resume treatment with the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD at the same dose in all patients after the neutrophil count recovers to ≥1.5×109/L based on complete blood count data, in order to maintain remission of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to adjust the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy in all patients if there is evidence of recurrent blood cell count decreases on the complete blood count, in order to manage adverse events associated with therapy [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe fluconazole** intravenously at 3–12 mg/kg/day, depending on the severity and duration of induced neutropenia, in patients with neutropenia to prevent fungal infections resulting from treatment with immunosuppressants and/or #rituximab** [1,3,6,7,436].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform a blood test for total protein, blood test for albumin, blood test for total bilirubin, blood test for free and conjugated bilirubin, blood test for creatinine, blood test for urea, blood test for uric acid, blood test for glucose, blood test for ferritin, blood test for triglycerides, blood test for cholesterol, blood test for sodium, blood test for potassium, blood test for total calcium, determination of lactate dehydrogenase activity in blood, determination of aspartate aminotransferase activity in blood, determination of alanine aminotransferase activity in blood, determination of gamma-glutamyltransferase activity in blood, determination of alkaline phosphatase activity in blood, blood serum iron test, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol test, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol test in blood, determination of creatine kinase activity in blood, determination of pancreatic amylase activity in blood, determination of lipase activity in blood in all patients in order to monitor disease activity, liver and pancreatic function, and electrolyte balance during immunosuppressive and/or genetically engineered biologic therapy [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: an increase in creatinine and/or urea, and/or uric acid, and/or total bilirubin, and/or K, and/or cholesterol, and/or triglycerides; an increase in LDH and/or ALT, and/or AST, and/or GGT, and/or ALP, and/or amylase activity may be an adverse manifestation of treatment with NSAIDs and/or immunosuppressants, and/or biologic agents, and/or GCs.
Serum iron during disease remission corresponds to reference values.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue the immunosuppressant and/o biologic agent if serum ALT and AST levels increase to ≥1.5 times the upper limit of normal and/or if total bilirubin, free (unconjugated) and/or conjugated bilirubin, and/or urea, and/or creatinine, and/or uric acid, and/or other biochemical parameter(s) exceed the upper limit of normal in all patients in order to prevent life-threatening complications [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued. Repeat the general biochemical blood test in 1 week.
It is recommended to resume therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biologic agent in all patients at the previous dose after normalization of general biochemical blood test parameters in order to maintain systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) remission [1,3,6,7,157].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to adjust immunosuppressant and/or biologic therapy in all patients presenting with recurrent episodes of elevated biochemical parameter(s) in order to manage adverse events associated with the therapy [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine antinuclear and anti-DNA antibody levels in the blood of all patients receiving TNF-alpha inhibitors to monitor for the development of lupus-like syndrome [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to test for serum C-reactive protein in all patients to determine the severity of the inflammatory process [1,3,6,7,34].
(Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: an elevated serum C-reactive protein level is a sign of secondary infection and/or macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) development.
It is recommended to test blood immunoglobulin levels in all patients to detect secondary immunodeficiency during immunosuppressive and/or genetically engineered biologic therapy [1,3,6,7,437–439].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: decreased immunoglobulin levels occur in secondary immunodeficiency states, predominantly during treatment with #rituximab** under conditions of B-cell depletion.
It is recommended to prescribe #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) at a dose of 400 mg/kg, and if an adequate blood immunoglobulin level is not achieved, at a dose of 500 mg/kg at least once every 2–4 weeks until blood immunoglobulin levels normalize, in the event of decreased blood immunoglobulin levels, to correct blood immunoglobulin levels and prevent infectious complications arising from immunodeficiency during immunosuppressive and/or genetically engineered biologic therapy [1,3,6,7,437–441].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to skip a scheduled infusion of #rituximab**, continue immunosuppressant treatment and previously prescribed oral GCs in case of decreased blood immunoglobulin levels in order to control adverse events during therapy [3,1,6,7,442–444].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to resume #rituximab** infusions after restoration of blood immunoglobulin levels in order to maintain sJIA remission [1,3,6,7,442–444].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to test blood procalcitonin levels in all patients with fever to rule out sepsis [1,3,6,7,40].
(Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: in sepsis, blood procalcitonin levels are elevated. In sJIA without infectious complications, they remain within reference ranges.
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive set of tests to rule out sepsis: complete blood count (CBC) with differential, general biochemical blood test, serum C-reactive protein test, blood culture for sterility, microbiological (cultural) examination of tonsil and posterior pharyngeal swabs for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, microbiological (cultural) examination of urine for bacterial pathogens using automated plating with determination of antimicrobial susceptibility, microbiological (cultural) examination of anal discharge, thromboelastography, coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis evaluation); chest computed tomography, complex abdominal ultrasound, renal ultrasound, echocardiography, abdominal MRI, pelvic MRI, and retroperitoneal MRI in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of sepsis in children [47,101–105,405].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: performed in patients with febrile, hectic fever, leukocytosis/leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, elevated serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels not related to sJIA activity.
It is recommended upon the development of sepsis to prescribe empirical antibacterial therapy first, and subsequently, depending on the clinical situation, intravenous systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) active against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (combinations of penicillins, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (J01CR) and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins (J01DE), and/or carbapenems (J01DH), and/or other antibacterials (J01XX), and/or glycopeptide antibiotics (J01XA), and/or other aminoglycosides (J01GB), and/or macrolides (J01FA)), with or without systemic antifungals (J02A) based on microbial susceptibility, combined with #normal human immunoglobulin** (J06BA) at a dose of 400 mg/kg/course (5 days) in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of sepsis in children [47,101–105,405,406,445].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: off-label systemic antibacterial agents (J01) are prescribed by decision of the medical board, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children over 15 years of age.
Upon the development of sepsis, the administration of biologic agents and injections/intake of immunosuppressants are suspended for the entire duration of antibiotic treatment. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
With increasing sJIA activity, pulse therapy with #methylprednisolone** (see above) is performed and/or oral GCs are prescribed (dose increased) (see sJIA treatment).
It is recommended to resume immunosuppressant and/or biologic therapy no earlier than one week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of sepsis and completion of antibiotic therapy in all patients in order to maintain sJIA remission [1,3,6,7,157].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine prothrombin index, soluble fibrin monomer complexes in blood, prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, activated partial thromboplastin time, thrombin time in blood, protein C level in blood, protein S activity in blood, plasminogen level in blood, fibrinogen level in blood, D-dimer concentration in blood, von Willebrand factor activity and properties in blood, and antithrombin III activity in blood in all patients to assess hemostatic function [3,7,17–24].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform thromboelastography in patients with macrophage activation syndrome, sepsis, signs of hypercoagulation and hypocoagulation, and in patients receiving antithrombotic agents (B01A) to assess the efficacy of anticoagulant therapy and determine further management [17,19,20,25,26,28,29,191].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to test blood heparin levels in all patients to assess the state of the hemostatic system and the efficacy of anticoagulant therapy [17,19,20,25,26].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe/adjust therapy with antithrombotic agents (B01A): heparin group drugs (B01B) or direct factor Xa inhibitors (B01AF); antiplatelet agents other than heparin (B01AC); antifibrinolytic agents (B02A) in the event of hypercoagulation, coagulopathy, or disseminated intravascular coagulation according to coagulogram (screening test of the hemostatic system) and thromboelastogram data [17,19,20,25,26].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: off-label use of antithrombotic agents (B01A) is determined by a medical commission decision, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children aged over 15 years.
It is recommended to perform blood transfusion according to indications in patients with consumption coagulopathy/bleeding [3,103,105,185,446].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in the event of consumption coagulopathy, blood transfusion is performed in the form of transfusion of blood and blood products (B05A): packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, coagulation factor VII, platelet concentrate, etc., according to indications.
It is recommended to analyze lymphocyte subsets in all patients receiving #rituximab** (L01XC), as well as in patients with a high frequency of viral and purulent bacterial infections, including opportunistic infections, to evaluate the subpopulation composition of lymphocytes (main subsets) [1,3,7,238–240,327,329].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: a decrease in the level of T and/or B lymphocyte subsets, and/or natural killer cells indicates the development of secondary immunodeficiency due to treatment with an immunosuppressant and/or genetically engineered biologic. Complete depletion of CD19+ B lymphocytes develops during treatment with CD20+ B-cell monoclonal antibodies #rituximab**.
It is recommended to determine Epstein-Barr virus DNA in peripheral and cord blood by quantitative PCR, to determine Epstein-Barr virus DNA in oropharyngeal swabs by qualitative PCR, and to determine Epstein-Barr virus DNA in urine by qualitative PCR in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids, in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and in patients with interstitial pneumonia to detect active herpetic infection as an infectious complication developing during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids [1,3,7,47,68–74,447].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine Cytomegalovirus DNA in peripheral and cord blood by quantitative PCR, to determine Cytomegalovirus DNA in oropharyngeal swabs by qualitative PCR, and to determine Cytomegalovirus DNA in urine by qualitative PCR in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids, in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and in patients with interstitial pneumonia to detect active herpetic infection as an infectious complication developing during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids [1,3,7,70,72,75,77–79].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in blood by quantitative PCR, to determine Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in oropharyngeal swabs by qualitative PCR, and to determine Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA in urine by qualitative PCR in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids, in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and in patients with interstitial pneumonia to detect active herpetic infection as an infectious complication developing during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids [1,3,7,70,72,75,80,448].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine blood IgM and IgG antibodies to Cytomegalovirus in all patients with interstitial and/or focal and/or infiltrative lung changes according to chest computed tomography who are receiving immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids, in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and in patients with interstitial pneumonia to detect active herpetic infection as an infectious complication developing during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids [1,72,75,78,79,81,82].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine blood IgM and IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids, in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and in patients with interstitial pneumonia to detect active herpetic infection as an infectious complication developing during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids [3,7,69,72,75,83].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine blood antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus capsid antigen (VCA) in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids, in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and in patients with interstitial pneumonia to detect active herpetic infection as an infectious complication developing during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids [3,7,69,83].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine blood IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus early antigens (EA) in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids, in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and in patients with interstitial pneumonia to detect active herpetic infection as an infectious complication developing during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids [3,7,69,83].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine blood antibodies to Herpes simplex virus in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids, in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and in patients with interstitial pneumonia to detect active herpetic infection as an infectious complication developing during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologics in combination (or without) with glucocorticoids [1,3,7,47,72,75,84–87].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to prescribe #acyclovir** (J05AB) at a dose of 200 mg orally 5 times a day (maximum 1000 mg/day) in children older than 2 years or at a dose of 5-10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 8 hours in the event of localized herpetic infection; to prescribe #acyclovir** at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 8 hours in children aged <1 year; at a dose of 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 8 hours in children aged ≥1 year in the event of Herpes zoster, in accordance with clinical guidelines for the management of herpesvirus infections in children, including immunocompromised patients [3,7,157,386,387,390,391].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #acyclovir** (J05AB) in children aged <3 years is prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Treatment with #acyclovir** is carried out for 7–10 days until the herpetic rashes completely disappear.
It is recommended to prescribe #ganciclovir** (J05AB) at a dose of 6 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days in the event of cytomegalovirus infection, or #ganciclovir** (J05AB) at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days in the event of Epstein-Barr virus infection, in accordance with clinical guidelines for the management of immunocompromised children [3,7,391,393–395].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #ganciclovir** (J05AB) in children aged <12 years is prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from the parents and approval from the local ethics committee of the medical organization.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue the immunosuppressant and/or genetically engineered biologic in all patients who develop a herpesvirus infection [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Administration of immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs is discontinued for the duration of antiviral therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
It is recommended to resume therapy with an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD in all patients no earlier than 1 week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of infection and completion of antiviral therapy [1,3,6,7,157].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to screen for the presence/absence of tuberculosis (focal tuberculin skin test, recombinant tuberculosis allergen test in standard dilution**, blood test for interferon-gamma level against Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, computed tomography of the chest organs) in all patients receiving bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants in combination (or not) with GCs at least twice a year [1,3,6,7,43,157,449,450].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to discontinue immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs in all patients with a detected positive intradermal tuberculin test (papule >5 mm) and/or elevated interferon-gamma level, and/or lung lesions, and/or intrathoracic lymph node involvement [1,3,6,7,43,449,450].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
It is recommended to conduct an initial consultation (examination, consultation) by a phthisiatrician for all patients with a positive focal tuberculin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculosis allergen, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma level against Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or lung and/or intrathoracic lymph node lesions to address the issue of further evaluation and specific therapy [1,3,6,7,43,157,449–451].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: if a tuberculous infection without a focus is detected, specific anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy is administered for 3–6 months (as decided by the phthisiatrician). Treatment with the immunosuppressant is continued under the supervision of a rheumatologist, complete blood count (CBC), and general biochemical blood tests; the issue of continuing bDMARD therapy is decided on an individual basis.
It is recommended to prescribe oral GCs to all patients upon the development of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) flare for the duration of specific anti-tuberculosis therapy to maintain sJIA remission [1,3,6,7,43,157,449,450].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the issue of resuming therapy and choosing a bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant is resolved after the completion of specific chemotherapy and consultation with a phthisiatrician.
It is recommended to resume therapy with an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD in all patients after completion of specific anti-tuberculosis therapy and consultation with a phthisiatrician [1,3,6,7,43,157,449,450].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the issue of continuing biologic DMARD therapy is decided on an individual basis.
It is recommended to determine antibodies to Salmonella enterica in the blood, antibodies to Salmonella typhi in the blood, class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in the blood, and antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica serovars in the blood in all patients to detect intestinal bacterial infection developed during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs in combination (or without) with GCs [1,3,7,81,452–459].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella boydii in the blood, antibodies to Shigella dysenteriae in the blood, class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella sonnei in the blood, and class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella flexneri in the blood in all patients to detect intestinal bacterial infection developed during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs in combination (or without) with GCs [1,3,7,81,452–459].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to administer etiotropic therapy upon detection of class A and M antibodies in diagnostic titer, as well as high-titer class G antibodies, to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, Yersinia enterocolitica serovars, Salmonella enterica, and Salmonella typhi in the blood in accordance with clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of intestinal infections in children [1,3,7,81,452–459].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Administration of bDMARDs and injections/intake of immunosuppressants are discontinued for the entire period of systemic antibacterial drug therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
Treatment with bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants is resumed no earlier than 1 week after the decrease in laboratory markers of infection and completion of antibacterial therapy.
It is recommended to determine class A, M, and G antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci in the blood; antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in the blood; antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae in the blood; and class M and G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the blood in all patients to detect mycoplasma and chlamydial infection developed during treatment with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs in combination (or without) with GCs [1,3,7,48,452,455–460].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to administer etiotropic therapy when IgA and IgM antibodies in diagnostic titers, as well as high titers of IgG antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydia psittaci, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae are detected in the blood of all patients, in accordance with clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of mycoplasma and chlamydial infection in children [1,3,7,48,452,455–460].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Administration of bDMARDs and injections/intake of immunosuppressants are discontinued for the entire period of systemic antibacterial drug therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
Treatment with bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants is resumed no earlier than 1 week after the decrease in laboratory markers of infection and completion of antibacterial therapy.
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of mucus from the tonsils and the posterior pharyngeal wall for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms in all patients to detect nasopharyngeal colonization by pathogenic or opportunistic microorganisms developing under treatment with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs combined with GCs [3,7,99,100,455–459].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: if nasopharyngeal contamination with pathogenic and/or opportunistic microorganisms is detected, an otorhinolaryngologist consultation is required to address the need for sanitization.
In the absence of clinical manifestations, bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy is not discontinued.
If inflammatory changes in the nasopharynx are present, antibacterial therapy is administered. bDMARD treatment and immunosuppressant injections/intake are suspended for the duration of antiviral therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued. Treatment with bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants is resumed no earlier than 1 week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of infection and completion of antiviral therapy.
It is recommended to perform a general (clinical) urine test, determine urine albumin, and quantify daily urinary protein in all patients to monitor renal function [1,3,7,106,107].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: if proteinuria worsens, immunosuppressive therapy is adjusted (see treatment of sJIA).
It is recommended to perform a urinalysis by the Nechiporenko method in all patients to monitor renal function [3,1,7,106,107].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram in all patients to monitor cardiac function [3,7,76,111,112].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: performed in all patients. In patients with sJIA remission, no pathological changes are detected on the electrocardiogram.
It is recommended to perform Holter electrocardiographic monitoring in patients with arrhythmia or pathological changes on the electrocardiogram to determine the nature of the arrhythmia [1,3,6,7,111,257].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with arterial hypertension to detect blood pressure deviations from normal and develop an antihypertensive therapy strategy [1,3,6,7,111,257,258].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive ultrasound examination of internal organs (including comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and renal ultrasound) in all patients to identify/rule out pathological changes [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: performed in all patients. Includes comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and renal ultrasound. Examinations may reveal: mild hepatomegaly, biliary dyskinesia, reactive changes in the pancreas, gallbladder wall thickening, gastric and intestinal wall thickening. All changes may be associated with adverse events of NSAID and/or GC, and/or immunosuppressant therapy.
It is recommended to perform echocardiography in all patients to monitor cardiac function and detect myocardial, pericardial, and endocardial lesions [1,3,7,111,112].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: performed in all patients. In patients with sJIA remission, no pathological changes are detected on echocardiography.
It is recommended to perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy with anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) or without it in patients receiving NSAIDs (M01A) and/or glucocorticoids (H02AB), and in patients with dyspeptic symptoms, to rule out upper gastrointestinal inflammatory diseases associated with the underlying disease and/or Helicobacter pylori and/or the use of NSAIDs and/or GCs [3,7,108,109,123–130].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) examination of Helicobacter pylori gastric mucosal biopsy specimens in patients with inflammatory and/or erosive, and/or ulcerative changes according to esophagogastroduodenoscopy to rule out gastrointestinal pathology associated with Helicobacter pylori [3,7,108,109,123–127,129–132].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to prescribe drugs for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease (A02B) upon detection of reflux disease and/or inflammatory gastropathy, erosive and/or ulcerative processes in the esophagus and/or stomach and/or duodenum based on esophagogastroduodenoscopy data, in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of inflammatory gastropathy and gastroesophageal reflux disease in children and international recommendations [3,7,461].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: for the duration of anti-inflammatory therapy, administration of bDMARDs and/re-injections/intake of immunosuppressants are suspended; previously prescribed GCs should be continued.
Resumption of treatment with biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants is carried out after the end of anti-inflammatory therapy.
It is recommended to perform eradication therapy including proton pump inhibitors (A02BC), systemic antibacterial drugs (J01), and bismuth potassium dicitrate** at a dose of 8 mg/kg/day in 1–2 intakes (for patients aged 4 to 8 years) for 4–8 weeks, at a dose of 120 mg 2 times/day (for patients aged 8 to 12 years), or at a dose of 120 mg 4 times/day or 240 mg 2 times/day (for patients older than 12 years) for inflammatory gastropathy, erosive and/or ulcerative processes in the stomach and/or duodenum associated with Helicobacter pylori, in accordance with clinical guidelines [124, 126, 461].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: eradication therapy outside of age indications is prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children aged ≥15 years.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs in all patients during eradication therapy [1, 3, 6, 7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: previously prescribed glucocorticoids should be continued. Resumption of treatment with immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs is carried out after the end of eradication therapy.
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging of joints (single joint) with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in all patients to monitor treatment efficacy [1, 3, 7, 119].
(Level of Evidence 1, Grade of Recommendation B)
It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the chest organs in all patients with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) to rule out pneumonia, pneumonitis, and tuberculosis [1, 3, 7, 44, 121, 139–141].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: during treatment with biologic DMARDs, especially in combination with immunosuppressants and glucocorticoids, pneumonia (interstitial, focal, lobar, polysegmental) may develop.
Pneumonia developing during biologic DMARD therapy is characterized by low-grade fever or its complete absence, a scant clinical picture, and no elevation of acute-phase inflammation markers: ESR, blood leukocyte count, and serum C-reactive protein level.
Interstitial pneumonia most frequently develops during the use of #rituximab**, and less commonly other immunosuppressants.
Interstitial pneumonia should be suspected if low-grade/high-grade fever, dry cough/cough with a small amount of sputum, dyspnea, crackles/decreased breath sounds on auscultation appear.
Focal pneumonia should be suspected if dry/wet cough or throat clearing appears.
It is recommended to perform bronchoscopy with anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in all patients when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative changes in the lungs are detected according to chest computed tomography [81, 212–215, 254, 255].
(LoE 3, GoR B)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis carinii cysts in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography to confirm/exclude pneumocystis etiology of pneumonia and decide on targeted therapy [212, 217, 218, 220, 221, 241–243].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform quantitative PCR detection of Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in sputum, endotracheal aspirate, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography to confirm/exclude pneumocystis etiology of pneumonia and decide on targeted therapy [212, 217–219, 241–244].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to determine class M and G antibodies to Pneumocystis jirovecii in the blood of all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on targeted therapy [212, 217–219, 241–244].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) examination of sputum for fungi (yeast and mold) in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on targeted therapy [81, 212–215, 254, 255].
(LoE 3, GoR B)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeast and mold) in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on targeted therapy [81, 212–215, 254, 255].
(LoE 3, GoR B)
It is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) examination of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on targeted therapy [81, 212–215, 254, 255].
(LoE 3, GoR B)
It is recommended to detect antibodies to Aspergillus spp. in the blood of all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on targeted therapy [81, 212–215, 254, 255].
(LoE 3, GoR B)
It is recommended to determine mannan and galactomannan in lavage fluid and blood in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on targeted therapy [81, 212–215, 254, 255].
(LoE 3, GoR B)
It is recommended to detect Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on targeted therapy [199–202].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to detect Cytomegalovirus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on targeted therapy [252].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG) DNA with species differentiation in sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, or bronchial washings by PCR in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography to identify the etiology of pneumonia and decide on targeted therapy [81, 209, 213, 245–251].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to prescribe empirical antibacterial therapy: #cotrimoxazole** (J01EE) combined with systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) active against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (J01CR), and/or 4th generation cephalosporins (J01DE), and/or carbapenems (J01DH), and/or other antibacterial drugs (J01X)) combined with systemic antifungals (J02A) prior to identifying the etiological factor of interstitial pneumonia, depending on the clinical situation and in accordance with guidelines for treating pneumonia in immunocompromised children [103, 104, 217, 243, 405, 455–459, 462, 463].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) outside of age indications are prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children older than 15 years.
The administration of biologic DMARDs and injections/administration of immunosuppressants are suspended for the duration of antibacterial therapy. Previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids should be continued. If signs of respiratory failure appear, the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit;
Treatment with tbDMARDs and immunosuppressants should be resumed no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of pneumonia according to laboratory tests, follow-up computed tomography of the chest with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy; prescription/adjustment of tbDMARDs is carried out after resolution of clinical, radiological, and laboratory signs of interstitial pneumonia.
It is recommended to administer intravenous glucocorticoids and #cotrimoxazole** (J01EE) at a dose of 3.75–5.0 mg/kg body weight/administration (15–20 mg/kg/day) (calculated as trimethoprim) intravenously every 8 hours for moderately severe Pneumocystis pneumonia, or at a dose of 3.75–5.0 mg/kg body weight/administration (15–20 mg/kg/day) (calculated as trimethoprim) intravenously every 6–8 hours for severe Pneumocystis pneumonia, in accordance with international guidelines for treating immunocompromised children [3, 7, 217, 243].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: #cotrimoxazole** (J01EE) outside of age indications is prescribed by decision of a medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and approval from the local ethics committee of the medical organization.
The administration of biologic DMARDs and injections/administration of immunosuppressants are suspended for the duration of antibacterial therapy. Previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids should be continued. If signs of respiratory failure appear, the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit;
Treatment with tbDMARDs and immunosuppressants should be resumed no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of pneumonia according to laboratory tests, follow-up computed tomography of the chest with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy; prescription/adjustment of tbDMARDs is carried out after resolution of clinical, radiological, and laboratory signs of interstitial pneumonia.
It is recommended to prescribe #voriconazole** at a dose of 6 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for the first 24 hours and 4 mg/kg starting from the second day, in accordance with international guidelines for the treatment of immunocompromised children, if galactomannan is detected in lavage fluid and/or blood and/or antibodies to Aspergillus spp. are detected in the blood [462, 464].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Administration of tbDMARDs and injections/intake of immunosuppressants are discontinued during antibacterial therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued. If signs of respiratory failure appear, the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit. Treatment with tbDMARDs and immunosuppressants is resumed no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of pneumonia according to laboratory tests, follow-up computed tomography of the chest with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy; prescription/adjustment of tbDMARDs is carried out after resolution of clinical, radiological, and laboratory signs of interstitial pneumonia.
It is recommended to prescribe fluconazole** intravenously at a dose of 6–12 mg/kg/day in accordance with international guidelines for the treatment of immunocompromised children if mannan is detected in lavage fluid and/or blood [1, 3, 7, 436].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: Administration of tbDMARDs and injections/intake of immunosuppressants are discontinued during antibacterial therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued. If signs of respiratory failure appear, the patient is transferred to the intensive care unit. Treatment with tbDMARDs and immunosuppressants is resumed no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of pneumonia according to laboratory tests, follow-up computed tomography of the chest with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy; prescription/adjustment of tbDMARDs is carried out after resolution of clinical, radiological, and laboratory signs of interstitial pneumonia.
It is recommended to prescribe systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) active against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations (J01CR), and/or 4th generation cephalosporins (J01DE), and/or carbapenems (J01DH), and/or other antibacterial drugs (J01X)) combined with systemic antifungals (J02A) for focal, lobar, or polysegmental pneumonia in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of pneumonia in immunocompromised children [103, 104, 217, 243, 405, 455–459, 462, 463].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) used off-label for age are prescribed by decision of a medical commission after obtaining informed parental consent.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants in all patients with suspected/developed pneumonia [1, 3, 6, 7, 16].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: treatment with biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants is suspended for the duration of antibacterial therapy. Previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids should be continued.
It is recommended to resume biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressive therapy in all patients no earlier than 1 week after the complete resolution of pneumonia based on laboratory findings, follow-up chest computed tomography (with or without anesthetic support, including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy [1,3,6,7,16,157].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: therapy is prescribed/adjusted after resolution of clinical, radiological, and laboratory signs of interstitial pneumonia.
It is recommended to perform X-ray of the temporomandibular joint and/or X-ray of the intervertebral joints, and/or X-ray of the elbow joint, and/or X-ray of the wrist joint, and/or X-ray of the knee joint, and/or X-ray of the shoulder joint, and/or X-ray of the hip joint, and/or X-ray of the ankle joint, and/or X-ray of the acromioclavicular joint, and/or X-ray of the sternoclavicular joint, and/or X-ray of the hand and/or X-ray of the foot in two projections, or computed tomography of the joint, with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), in all patients with a history of active arthritis to determine the degree of bone and cartilage destruction [1,3,7,113,118].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: performed no more than once every 12 months.
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), in patients with a history of brain involvement to assess its status [1,3,6,7,16,259–264].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform X-ray densitometry in all patients receiving or who have received glucocorticoids to detect osteopenia/osteoporosis [272,273].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe calcium preparations (A12A) and vitamin D and its analogues (A11CC) to patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis in accordance with clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of secondary osteoporosis in children [272,273,410,465].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe #pamidronic acid, or #alendronic acid**, or #zoledronic acid**, or #ibandronic acid to patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis for the treatment of osteoporosis [272,466–468].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: bisphosphonates (M05BA) are prescribed for life-health indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children aged ≥15 years.
The following regimens for prescribing bisphosphonates (M05BA) are recommended:
— #pamidronic acid (maximum dose 60 mg/infusion) [272]:
in patients <1 year of age at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg IV every 2 months,
in patients aged 1–2 years at a dose of 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 3 months,
in patients aged 2–3 years at a dose of 0.375–0.75 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 3 months,
in patients older than 3 years at a dose of 0.5–1 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 4 months.
— or #alendronic acid** (maximum dose 70 mg/week) [272]:
at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg/week orally,
in patients with body weight <40 kg at a dose of 5 mg/day or 35 mg/week,
in patients with body weight >40 kg at a dose of 10 mg/day or 70 mg/week.
— or #zoledronic acid** at a dose of 0.0125–0.05 mg/kg/infusion IV every 6–12 months (maximum dose 4 mg) [272];
— or #ibandronic acid:
at a dose of 3 mg/infusion IV once every 3 months [468]
or 150 mg orally once a month [467]
in patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis for the treatment of osteoporosis [272,466–468].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: bisphosphonates (M05BA) are prescribed for life-health indications, by decision of the medical commission, after obtaining informed consent from parents and children aged ≥15 years.
It is recommended that all patients undergo an initial examination (inspection, consultation) by an otorhinolaryngologist to identify foci of chronic ENT infection and address the issue of their sanitation for the prevention of infectious conditions under treatment with immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs combined with (or without) glucocorticoids; and to assess the efficacy of ENT sanitation in patients who have undergone it [1,3,6,7,16,274].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended that all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs combined with (or without) glucocorticoids undergo an initial examination (inspection, consultation) by a pediatric dentist to determine the condition of the oral cavity and address the issue of its sanitation or evaluate its efficacy [1,3,6,7,16,275].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended that all patients undergo an initial examination (inspection, consultation) by an ophthalmologist with mandatory biomicroscopy of the eye to rule out uveitis, as well as patients receiving glucocorticoids to rule out complicated cataract [1,3,6,7,16,159].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: patients with complicated cataract undergo evaluation of therapy efficacy and assessment of the need for surgical treatment.
It is recommended to perform an initial examination (inspection, consultation) by a pediatric cardiologist in patients with cardiac disorders and/or arterial hypertension to address the issue of cardiotropic and/or antihypertensive therapy [1,3,6,7,16].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended that all patients with a positive focal tuberculin skin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculosis allergen, and/or an elevated blood interferon-gamma level to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or focal or infiltrative lung changes undergo an initial examination (inspection, consultation) by a phthisiatrician to address the issue of chemoprophylaxis or anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy [1,3,6,7,16,43,44,157,449].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial examination (inspection, consultation) by a pediatric endocrinologist in patients with endocrine pathology, including those receiving glucocorticoids, to monitor treatment efficacy [1,3,7,272,273,277].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial examination (inspection, consultation) by a dietician in patients with underweight, amyotrophy, osteopenia/osteoporosis, constitutional obesity, Cushing's syndrome, and steroid diabetes to develop an individual dietary program and behavioral dietary recommendations in an outpatient setting [1,3,6,7,16].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended that all patients with functional joint insufficiency, impaired longitudinal bone growth, subluxations, or back pain undergo an initial examination (inspection, consultation) by a trauma surgeon / orthopedic surgeon to address the issue of reconstructive surgery and joint replacement [1,3,6,7,16].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended that all patients with neurological symptoms, psychomotor retardation, or psychotic reactions undergo an initial examination (inspection, consultation) by a neurologist to address the issue of therapy [1,3,6,7,16].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended that all patients with neurological symptoms, psychomotor retardation, or psychotic reactions undergo a follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a neurologist to evaluate the efficacy of the administered therapy [1,3,6,7,16].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended that all patients aged 1 year and older and their parents undergo an initial examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist to harmonize the development of the child's personality in the context of a severe chronic disease and optimize child-parent relationships; to increase treatment adherence and cooperation with the physician and medical staff to achieve disease remission and psychological adaptation in society [1,3,6,7,168–174].
(LEL 2, GOR A)
It is recommended that all patients with functional insufficiency undergo an initial examination (consultation) by a physical therapy physician to develop a program of physiotherapeutic procedures as part of an individual rehabilitation program [1,3,6,7,411–414,469].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended that patients undergo a follow-up examination (consultation) by a physical therapy physician after completing the program of physiotherapeutic procedures to evaluate its efficacy [1,3,6,7,18,411–413,469].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended that all patients with functional insufficiency undergo an examination (inspection, consultation) by an exercise therapy physician to develop a physical therapy (exercise) regimen as part of an individual rehabilitation program [1,3,6,7,411–414,470]
(LE 1, GR C)
It is recommended that medical rehabilitation be provided to all patients with functional insufficiency to restore functional capacity [1,3,6,7,411–424].
(LoE 2, GoR B)
It is recommended that all patients with functional insufficiency undergo a follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by an exercise therapy physician after completing the rehabilitation program to evaluate its efficacy [1,3,6,7,411–414,470].
(LE 1, GR C)
It is recommended to adjust anti-rheumatic therapy in the inpatient rheumatology department that initiated treatment with biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants if the inactive disease stage is not achieved at 6 months, remission at 12 months, and further every 6 months [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Monitoring of treatment efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5
It is recommended to adjust anti-rheumatic therapy in the inpatient rheumatology department that initiated treatment with biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants at any stage of treatment if adverse events develop during therapy with biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
5.2.1. Oncological alertness in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis receiving bDMARDs/immunosuppressants
Considering that one of the adverse effects of bDMARD therapy is oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases, it is essential to maintain oncological alertness at any stage of treatment (both in inpatient settings and during follow-up dispensary observation).
It is recommended to maintain oncological alertness due to the potential development of oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases during bDMARD therapy at any stage of treatment [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to immediately discontinue the immunosuppressant/bDMARD and hospitalize the patient if an oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative disease is suspected, in order to perform appropriate diagnostic workup [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to obtain a bone marrow cytologic specimen using anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) via puncture, as well as a bone marrow histologic specimen with cytologic examination of a bone marrow smear (myelogram) and pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods, in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD who present with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases / metastatic bone marrow involvement [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform a lymph node biopsy (peripheral, or intra-abdominal/intrathoracic as indicated) using anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) with cytologic examination of the lymph node tissue specimen and pathomorphological examination of the lymph node biopsy (surgical) material, in patients with marked enlargement of peripheral and/or intrathoracic and/or intra-abdominal lymph nodes receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases / metastatic lymph node involvement [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced brain MRI, intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI, intravenous contrast-enhanced retroperitoneal MRI, and intravenous contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform intravenous bolus contrast-enhanced chest CT with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out lung metastases / mediastinal involvement in oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced MRI of bone tissue (one region) and MRI of joints (one joint) with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out oncological/oncohematological diseases [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform bone CT and joint CT with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD who have bone destruction foci atypical for sJIA, in order to rule out oncological/oncohematological diseases [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) using tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)), with contrast enhancement, and whole-body PET-CT with tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)) if necessary, with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD who present with severe arthralgia, myalgia, ossalgia, bone destruction changes, subcutaneous adipose tissue infiltrates, or foci in parenchymal organs, the brain, or the spinal cord, in order to rule out oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative diseases [1,3,7,143,146].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform multi-positional bone scintigraphy with or without anesthetic support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD who have bone destruction foci atypical for sJIA, in order to rule out malignant neoplasms / metastatic bone involvement [1,3,7,122,143,146].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform CT-guided core needle biopsy of the pelvic bones using anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), with pathomorphological examination of the bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods; cytologic examination of bone marrow core biopsy imprints; immunocytochemical examination of bone marrow core biopsy imprints; and immunophenotyping of hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow, in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course, in order to rule out hemoblastoses/lymphoproliferative diseases/metastatic bone marrow involvement [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform a bone biopsy using anesthetic support (including early postoperative management), with pathomorphological examination of the bone tissue biopsy (surgical) material in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD who have bone destruction foci atypical for sJIA, in order to rule out malignant neoplasms/metastatic bone involvement [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to arrange an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a pediatric oncologist for patients in whom an oncological/oncohematological/lymphoproliferative disease or metastatic involvement is suspected/detected based on diagnostic results, in order to decide on transferring the child to a specialized center for further evaluation and treatment [3,7,47,122,143,147–152].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
5.3. Follow-up evaluation as part of dispensary observation in outpatient and polyclinic settings
It is recommended to provide dispensary observation for patients with sJIA in remission, comprising an initial and follow-up consultation (examination, assessment) by a rheumatologist [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the rheumatologist examines the patient at least once a month, assesses their general condition, presence of systemic manifestations, and joint syndrome activity; analyzes the efficacy and safety of antirheumatic therapy using standard questionnaires and scales (see Appendices G1–G5); analyzes the results of laboratory and instrumental examinations; conducts health education work with the patient and their parents (legal representatives), explaining the necessity of treatment adherence, psychological and medical rehabilitation; explains which adverse events may develop during treatment with bDMARDs, GCS, and immunosuppressants; how infections manifest under bDMARD therapy; and what actions parents should take in the event of infections and adverse reactions to antirheumatic drugs; interacts with medical specialists and with the rheumatologist of the inpatient rheumatology department, including via telemedicine.
It is recommended to provide dispensary observation for patients with sJIA—specifically an initial consultation (examination, assessment) by a rheumatologist with an evaluation of therapy efficacy and safety at least once a year following the initiation/adjustment of therapy and after disease remission is achieved [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to provide dispensary observation for patients with sJIA—specifically a follow-up consultation (examination, assessment) by a rheumatologist with an evaluation of therapy efficacy and safety at least once a month after the initiation/adjustment of therapy and at least once every 3 months after disease remission is achieved [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the pediatric rheumatologist examines the patient, assesses their general condition, the presence of systemic manifestations, and lupus nephritis activity; analyzes the efficacy and safety of antirheumatic therapy using generally accepted questionnaires and scales (see Appendices G1-G5); analyzes the results of laboratory and instrumental examinations; conducts health education for the patient and their parents (legal representatives), explaining the necessity of treatment adherence, as well as psychological and medical rehabilitation; explains what adverse events may develop during treatment with biologic DMARDs, glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressants; explains how infections present under biologic DMARD treatment; what actions parents should take if infections and adverse events of antirheumatic drugs develop; interacts with medical specialists, as well as with the inpatient rheumatologist of the rheumatology department, including via telehealth.
It is recommended to immediately stop the infusion/injection of a biologic DMARD and/or the injection/administration of an immunosuppressant in the event of an allergic reaction of any severity [1,3,6,7,450].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: an allergic reaction can occur at any stage of treatment with a biologic DMARD and/or immunosuppressant.
It is recommended to prescribe systemic antihistamines and/or glucocorticoids in the event of an allergic reaction to the administration of a biologic DMARD and/or immunosuppressant [1,3,6,7,450].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: the choice of drug and its route of administration depend on the severity of the allergic reaction.
It is recommended to conduct an appointment (examination, consultation, including telehealth) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, if an allergic reaction occurs to the administration of a biologic DMARD and/or immunosuppressant, in order to decide on the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be performed [1,3,6,7,450].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform emergency hospitalization in the event of an allergic reaction to the administration of a biologic DMARD and/or immunosuppressant in order to decide on the need for therapy adjustment [1,3,6,7,450].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (CBC) with differential (erythrocyte sedimentation rate determination, red blood cell count, leukocyte count, platelet count, leukocyte differential count, hemoglobin level determination) for all patients at least once every 2–4 weeks to monitor disease activity and the adverse effects of anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs on the bone marrow [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to discontinue the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD, and continue previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids if the platelet count decreases to ≤150>100×109/L, and the neutrophil count decreases to <1.5≥1.0×109/L according to the complete blood count with differential, in order to prevent infectious complications [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: repeat the complete blood count with differential in one week.
It is recommended to prescribe the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** (LO3AA) at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously when leukopenia occurs with an absolute neutrophil count of <1.0×109/L for 3–5 days (longer if necessary) in order to normalize blood leukocyte counts [1,3,6,7,401,402,404].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: neutropenia most frequently develops during treatment with #rituximab**.
It is recommended to prescribe the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** (LO3AA) at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously, urgent hospitalization to a local hospital, and systemic antibacterial drugs (J01) intravenously in the event of febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) with an absolute neutrophil count of <1.0×109/L in order to normalize blood leukocyte counts and prevent infectious complications [1,3,6,7,401,402,404].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
It is recommended to continue therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD at the previous dose after the normalization of complete blood count parameters and an increase in the blood neutrophil count to ≥1.5×109/L in order to prevent increased disease activity / maintain remission of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe fluconazole** 3–12 mg/kg/day orally, depending on the severity and duration of induced neutropenia, in patients with neutropenia for the prevention of fungal infections resulting from immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD treatment [1,3,6,7,436].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to conduct an appointment (examination, consultation, including telehealth) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy for all patients presenting with a repeated episode of decreased neutrophil count, development of febrile neutropenia, and/or decreased blood platelet count according to the complete blood count, in order to decide on the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be performed [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to test for total blood protein, blood albumin, total blood bilirubin, free and conjugated blood bilirubin, blood creatinine, blood urea, blood uric acid, blood glucose, blood ferritin, blood triglycerides, blood cholesterol, blood sodium, blood potassium, total blood calcium, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) activity, and alkaline phosphatase activity in blood serum for all patients at least once every 2–4 weeks in order to monitor disease activity, liver, kidney, and pancreatic function, and electrolyte balance during immunosuppressive and biologic therapy [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: if blood ferritin levels are ≥684 ng/mL, along with elevated triglycerides, ALT, AST, and LDH activity, combined with bicytopenia, macrophage activation syndrome (hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis) should be suspected, and the child must be urgently referred for hospitalization in the inpatient rheumatology department.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD, and continue previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids if blood ALT and AST activity exceed the upper limit of normal by ≥1.5 times and/or other biochemical parameters exceed the upper limit of normal, in order to prevent the progression of a toxic reaction [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids should be continued.
Repeat the general clinical biochemistry blood test in one week.
It is recommended to continue therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD at the same dose after the normalization of biochemical parameter(s) in order to prevent increased disease activity / maintain remission of sJIA [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to conduct an appointment (examination, consultation, including telehealth) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy if there is data on repeated episodes of elevated biochemical parameter(s), in order to decide on the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be performed [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-DNA antibodies in the blood of all patients receiving TNF-alpha inhibitors at least once every 3 months to monitor therapy safety [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: if autoantibody titers increase, an appointment (examination, consultation, including telehealth) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy is performed.
The decision regarding the need to adjust therapy and the setting in which it should be administered is made by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, based on the results of an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy.
It is recommended to measure serum C-reactive protein at least once every 3 months to monitor disease activity [1,3,6,7,34].
(Level of Evidence 3, Grade of Recommendation C)
Comments: if serum C-reactive protein levels increase, an appointment (examination, consultation, including telehealth) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy is performed.
The decision regarding the need to adjust therapy and the setting in which it should be administered is made by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, based on the results of an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy.
It is recommended to measure blood immunoglobulin levels at least once every 3 months in all patients to detect/exclude an immunodeficiency state developing during immunosuppressant and biologic DMARD treatment [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: decreased blood immunoglobulin levels develop in secondary immunodeficiency states, predominantly during #rituximab** treatment under conditions of B-lymphocyte depletion.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD, and continue previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids in the event of decreased blood immunoglobulin levels in order to prevent infectious complications [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an appointment (examination, consultation, including telemedicine) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, in case of decreased blood immunoglobulin levels, to address the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be performed [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to hospitalize patients with decreased blood immunoglobulin levels to administer replacement therapy with #normal human immunoglobulin** [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to determine anti-streptolysin-O in blood serum to detect/exclude group A β-hemolytic streptococcus infection at least once every 3 months [1,3,6,7,34].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: an elevated serum anti-streptolysin-O level indicates acute or chronic streptococcal infection.
It is recommended to remain alert for the potential development of infectious diseases in patients with sJIA receiving biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and/or immunosuppressants, with or without glucocorticoids (GCs) [1,3,6,7,452].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy while continuing previously prescribed oral GCs in all patients who develop signs of an infectious complication [1,3,6,7,34].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an appointment (examination, consultation, including telemedicine) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy for all patients presenting with signs of an infectious complication to address the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be performed [1,3,6,7,34].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to urgently hospitalize the patient in case of suspected/developed pneumonia [1,3,6,7,34].
(LE 5, GR C)
Comments: interstitial pneumonia most frequently develops during the use of #rituximab**, and less commonly other immunosuppressants and bDMARDs.
Pneumonia should be suspected if low-grade/febrile fever, dry/productive cough or minor coughing and/or low-grade/febrile fever unrelated to an exacerbation of the underlying disease, and/or dyspnea/breathing difficulty, and/or crepitations/decreased breath sounds upon auscultation appear.
The child is urgently hospitalized in the inpatient rheumatology department for diagnosis and treatment (see above).
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy while continuing previously prescribed oral GCs in all patients with suspected/developed pneumonia [1,3,6,7,34].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an appointment (examination, consultation, including telemedicine) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy for all patients with suspected/developed pneumonia to address the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be performed [1,3,6,7,34].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to prescribe #acyclovir** (J05AB) at a dose of 200 mg orally 5 times a day for children older than 2 years (not exceeding 1000 mg/day) in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of herpesvirus infections in children, including immunocompromised status, upon the development of a localized herpes infection [3,7,391].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: in children aged <3 years, #acyclovir** (J05AB) is prescribed by decision of a medical commission after obtaining informed consent from the parents.
Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
Treatment with direct-acting and systemic antiviral drugs is carried out until the complete resolution of the viral infection and the completion of antiviral therapy.
Treatment with #acyclovir** is carried out for 7–10 days until the herpetic rashes completely disappear.
It is recommended to temporarily discontinue immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy in all patients who develop a herpesvirus infection [1,3,6,7,34].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: Administration of immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs is discontinued for the duration of antiviral therapy. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
It is recommended to hospitalize all patients in case of generalized herpetic infection/suspected cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus infection [1,3,6,7,34].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: an appointment (examination, consultation, including remote ones) is conducted with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy, to resolve the issue of further patient management.
It is recommended to resume immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy no earlier than 1 week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of infection and the completion of antiviral therapy [1,3,6,7,34].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to monitor the efficacy of bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants in a timely manner to decide on "switching" to an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with a different mechanism of action, with the aim of achieving disease remission, preventing complications, and halting the progression of patient disability [1,3,6,7,34].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the efficacy of anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs is monitored at least once a month, with special attention paid to the development of secondary inefficacy. Secondary inefficacy of bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants manifests as a "loss of effect" and increasing disease activity at any stage of treatment. If secondary inefficacy develops, an urgent appointment (examination, consultation, including telemedicine) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy is performed.
The decision regarding the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be performed is made by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy based on the consultation results (including remote).
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5
It is recommended to vaccinate children only during disease remission lasting for at least 6 months, according to an individual schedule, excluding live vaccines [3,7,430,431].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to monitor the tolerability of bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants in all patients to prevent severe toxic complications, ensure timely drug withdrawal, and "switch" to an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with a different mechanism of action [1,3,6,7,450,471].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
Comments: intolerance to bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants can develop at any stage of treatment. If intolerance develops, regardless of its severity, the bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant is discontinued. Previously prescribed oral GCs should be continued.
It is recommended to have an appointment (examination, consultation, including telemedicine) with the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated the therapy for all patients who develop any signs of intolerance to the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD to address the need for therapy adjustment and the setting in which it should be performed [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a tuberculin skin test (Mantoux test, test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen in standard dilution**) in all patients at least once every 6 months (more frequently if indicated) to rule out Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection during antirheumatic therapy [1,3,6,7,34,43,44,449,450].
(LEL 4, GRC C)
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count and urinalysis at least once a month in all patients to monitor renal function [1,3,6,7,34].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram in all patients at least once every 3 months as part of follow-up care to monitor the cardiovascular system [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, echocardiography, and renal ultrasound in all patients at least once every 6 months as part of follow-up care to monitor disease activity and adverse events of antirheumatic therapy [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an initial appointment (examination, consultation) with an otolaryngologist for patients with ENT pathology no later than 7 days after hospital discharge to detect foci of chronic ENT infection and address their sanitation, as well as to diagnose acute ENT infections that have developed in the setting of antirheumatic therapy [1,3,6,7,274].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have follow-up appointments (examinations, consultations) with an otolaryngologist at least once every 6 months for patients who require the sanitation of chronic infection foci and treatment of acute ENT infections, in order to prevent infectious complications during antirheumatic therapy [1,3,6,7,274].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have a routine follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) with an otolaryngologist at least once every 3 months as part of follow-up care for all patients to monitor the condition of ENT organs for early detection of pathology and its treatment to prevent infectious complications during antirheumatic therapy [1,3,6,7,274].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have an initial appointment (examination, consultation) with a pediatric cardiologist no later than 7 days after hospital discharge for patients with cardiac arrhythmias and/or arterial hypertension to develop an individual cardiotropic and/or antihypertensive therapy program based on the recommendations of the inpatient pediatric cardiologist [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to have follow-up appointments (examinations, consultations) with a pediatric cardiologist at least once every 3 months for patients with cardiac arrhythmias and/or arterial hypertension to monitor the efficacy of the individual cardiotropic and/or antihypertensive therapy program developed on the recommendations of the inpatient pediatric cardiologist [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial dental examination (consultation) by a pediatric dentist for all patients within 1 month after discharge from the hospital to detect inflammatory changes in the oral cavity [1,3,6,7,275,276].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a follow-up dispensary dental examination (consultation) by a pediatric dentist for all patients at least once every 3 months as part of dispensary monitoring to control the condition of the oral cavity, for early detection of pathology, and its treatment to prevent the development of infectious complications under anti-rheumatic therapy [1,3,6,7,161,275,276].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial ophthalmological examination (consultation) with mandatory eye biomicroscopy no later than 7 days after discharge from the hospital for patients with ophthalmological pathology in order to develop an individual treatment program based on the recommendations of the inpatient ophthalmologist [1,3,6,7,159].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a repeat ophthalmological examination (consultation) with mandatory eye biomicroscopy for all patients with ophthalmological pathology according to individual indications in order to monitor the effectiveness of treatment and adjust it if necessary [1,3,6,7,159].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a dispensary ophthalmological examination (consultation) with mandatory eye biomicroscopy for all patients at least once every 3 months as part of dispensary monitoring to monitor the state of the visual organ [1,3,6,7,159].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial dietary consultation (examination) by a nutritionist within 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital for patients with underweight, amyotrophy, osteopenia/osteoporosis, constitutional obesity, Cushing's syndrome, and steroid diabetes in order to develop an individual dietary program [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a repeat dietary consultation (examination) by a nutritionist for patients with underweight, amyotrophy, osteopenia/osteoporosis, constitutional obesity, Cushing's syndrome, and steroid diabetes according to individual indications in order to monitor/adjust the individual dietary program [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by a phthisiatrician for patients with a positive focal tuberculin skin test and/or intradermal test with a tuberculosis allergen, and/or an elevated blood interferon-gamma level to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or focal or infiltrative changes in the lungs to resolve the issue of chemoprophylaxis or anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy [1,3,6,7,43,44,157,449].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the decision on the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out is made by the rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated the prescription of therapy based on the results of the consultation (including remote ones).
It is recommended to perform a consultation (examination, including remote) by a rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated the prescription of therapy for patients with a positive intradermal tuberculin test to address the possibility of continuing treatment with biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants [1,3,6,7,43,44,157,449].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a repeat consultation (examination) by a phthisiatrician for patients with a positive focal tuberculin skin test and/or intradermal test with a tuberculosis allergen, and/or an elevated blood interferon-gamma level to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or focal or infiltrative changes in the lungs in order to monitor/adjust chemoprophylaxis or anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy [1,3,6,7,43,44,157,449].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: the decision on the need for therapy adjustment and the conditions under which it should be carried out is made by the rheumatologist of the inpatient facility that initiated the prescription of therapy based on the results of the consultation (including remote ones).
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by a pediatric endocrinologist no later than 7 days after discharge from the hospital for all patients receiving glucocorticoids and having steroid diabetes in order to prescribe an individual program recommended by the inpatient pediatric endocrinologist [1,3,6,7,272,273,277].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a dispensary consultation (examination) by a pediatric endocrinologist at least once every 3 months for all patients receiving glucocorticoids and having steroid diabetes in order to monitor/adjust the individual program recommended by the inpatient pediatric endocrinologist [1,3,6,7,272,273,277].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by an orthopedic traumatologist no later than 7 days after discharge from the hospital for patients with functional joint insufficiency, impaired bone longitudinal growth, subluxations, or back pain after discharge from the hospital in order to resolve the issue of the need for orthopedic correction [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a dispensary consultation (examination) by an orthopedic traumatologist for all patients at least once every 3 months as part of dispensary monitoring to detect functional disorders and monitor orthopedic correction [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (testing, examination) by a medical psychologist no later than 7 days after hospital discharge for all patients and their parents after discharge from the hospital in order to develop a psychological rehabilitation program for the patient and their parents [1,3,6,7,168,169].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a repeat consultation (testing, examination) by a medical psychologist for all patients and their parents after completing the psychological rehabilitation program in order to assess its effectiveness [1,3,6,7,168,169].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a dispensary consultation (testing, examination) by a medical psychologist for all patients and their parents at least once every 3 months as part of dispensary monitoring to test the psychological state of patients and their parents [1,3,6,7,168,169].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform an initial consultation (examination) by a physical therapy physician for all patients within 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital with joint function impairment in order to develop a physiotherapy program [1,3,6,7,411–414,469].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a consultation (examination) by an exercise therapy physician within 2 weeks after discharge from the hospital for all patients after hospital discharge in order to develop an individual rehabilitation program based on the recommendations of the inpatient exercise therapy physician [1,3,6,7,411–424]
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to carry out medical rehabilitation for all patients with functional insufficiency as part of an individual rehabilitation program [1,3,6,7,411–424].
(LoE 2, GoR B)
It is recommended to perform a repeat consultation (examination) by a physical therapy physician for all patients to monitor the effectiveness of the rehabilitation program [1,3,6,7,411–414,469].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a repeat consultation (examination) by an exercise therapy physician for patients according to individual indications in order to monitor the effectiveness of the rehabilitation program [3,6,7,76,411–414].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
It is recommended to perform a dispensary consultation (examination) by an exercise therapy physician at least once every 3 months as part of dispensary monitoring [1,3,6,7,411–414].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Comments: performed in all patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis
It is recommended to carry out scheduled hospitalization in the rheumatology department of the hospital that initiated the therapy with biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants for all patients 3 and 6 months after the prescription of therapy and further every 6 months to monitor the efficacy and safety of therapy [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
Monitoring of therapy efficacy – see Appendices G1–G5
It is recommended to carry out unscheduled hospitalization according to indications in the rheumatology department of the hospital that initiated the prescription of biologic DMARDs/immunosuppressants for the purpose of examination and therapy adjustment at any stage of treatment in the event of exacerbation/complications of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, comorbid conditions, complications/side effects/persistent intolerance to biologic DMARDs/immunosuppressants [1,3,6,7].
(LoE 5, GoR C)
6. Organization of Medical Care
6.1. Indications for hospital admission and discharge of patients.
Suspected sJIA
Diagnostic procedures, including differential diagnostics and prescription of antirheumatic therapy, are performed for all patients in an inpatient rheumatology department.
Indications for discharge
Completion of examination; establishment of the diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Prescription of antirheumatic therapy.
Absence of side effects or intolerance.
Stabilization of the condition during drug therapy: relief of fever and other systemic manifestations, reduction in the activity of joint syndrome.
Pronounced trend toward normalization / normalization of laboratory markers of activity.
Established sJIA diagnosis, active stage
Examination and adjustment of therapy in case of its ineffectiveness are performed for all patients in an inpatient rheumatology department.
Indications for discharge
Completion of examination.
Adjustment of therapy.
Absence of adverse effects or drug intolerance. Stabilization of the condition under pharmacological therapy: resolution of fever, other systemic manifestations, and decrease in joint syndrome activity.
Pronounced trend toward normalization / normalization of laboratory markers of activity.
Established diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with active macrophage activation syndrome.
Diagnosis, including differential diagnosis, and prescription of therapy for all patients, intravenous administration of drugs, including biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, are carried out in the setting of the inpatient rheumatology department.
Indications for discharge
Completion of examination.
Prescription of therapy.
Absence of side effects or drug intolerance.
Stabilization of the condition during drug therapy: relief of fever and other systemic manifestations, reduction in the activity of joint syndrome.
Relief of clinical and laboratory signs of hemophagocytic syndrome.
Pronounced trend towards normalization / normalization of laboratory indicators of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis activity.
Established sJIA diagnosis, regardless of stage
Examination and adjustment of therapy upon the development of complications/intolerance to drug treatment are performed in an inpatient rheumatology department.
Indications for discharge
Completion of examination.
Relief of side effects.
Adjustment of therapy.
Absence of side effects or drug intolerance.
Absence of signs of disease activity.
Established sJIA diagnosis, in remission
Monitoring the efficacy and safety of antirheumatic therapy is carried out in the hospital rheumatology department 3 months after initiating therapy, 6 months after initiating therapy, and every 6 months thereafter.
Indications for discharge
50% improvement according to ACR Pedi criteria / inactive disease stage according to C. Wallace criteria at 3 months.
Inactive disease stage at 6 months; remission according to C. Wallace criteria at 12 months and further every 6 months.
Absence of adverse events / drug intolerance
A patient with an established diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis who develops an exacerbation/complications of the disease, comorbid conditions, complications/side effects/persistent intolerance to biologic DMARDs/immunosuppressants must be urgently hospitalized in the rheumatology department of the hospital that initiated the prescription of biologic DMARDs/immunosuppressants for examination and therapy adjustment at any stage of treatment.
Indications for antirheumatic therapy, including genetically engineered biologic drugs (intramuscular and subcutaneous administration), in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a medical organization (pediatric rheumatology department in an inpatient and/or day hospital setting; procedural room of a primary care medical organization; procedural room of a paramedic-midwife station [if a pediatric rheumatology office is unavailable]):
Inability of parents (legal representatives) and/or the patient aged over 15 years to independently administer genetically engineered biologic drugs (intramuscular and subcutaneous administration) at home due to low compliance and lack of drug administration skills.
Indications for consultation with a federal-subordinate medical organization, including via telemedicine technologies:
Prescription and/or replacement of genetically engineered biologic drugs and/or targeted immunosuppressants with or without glucocorticoid pulse therapy, and/or immunosuppressants, and/or high-dose normal human immunoglobulin in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with high/moderate inflammatory activity and/or resistance to ongoing drug therapy.
6.2. Regulatory and legal documents governing the provision of medical care to children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 700n dated October 7, 2015 (as amended on December 9, 2019), "On the Nomenclature of Specialties of Specialists with Higher Medical and Pharmaceutical Education" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on November 12, 2015, Registration No. 39696).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 206n dated May 2, 2023, "On Approval of Qualification Requirements for Medical and Pharmaceutical Workers with Higher Education" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on June 1, 2023, Registration No. 73677).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 441n dated October 25, 2012, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Children Profiled in 'Rheumatology'" (as amended on February 21, 2020).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 274n dated April 21, 2022, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Patients with Congenital and/or Hereditary Diseases" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on July 13, 2022, Registration No. 69251).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 878n dated October 23, 2019, "On Approval of the Procedure for Organizing Medical Rehabilitation for Children" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on December 23, 2019, Registration No. 56954).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 231n dated March 19, 2021 (as amended on February 21, 2022), "On Approval of the Procedure for Monitoring the Volume, Timeliness, Quality, and Conditions of Medical Care Provision under Compulsory Medical Insurance to Insured Persons, as well as Its Financial Provision" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on May 13, 2021, Registration No. 63410).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 108n dated February 28, 2019 (as amended on December 13, 2022), "On Approval of the Rules of Compulsory Medical Insurance" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on May 17, 2019, Registration No. 54643).
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 789n dated December 13, 2022, "On Amendments to the Rules of Compulsory Medical Insurance Approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 108n dated February 28, 2019" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on December 30, 2022, Registration No. 71905).
Amendment 14.1 to Article 37. Organization of Medical Care of Federal Law No. 323-FZ dated November 21, 2011 (as amended on June 11, 2022, with amendments dated July 13, 2022), "On the Fundamentals of Protecting Public Health in the Russian Federation" (with amendments and additions, effective June 29, 2022): "Standards of medical care for children and clinical guidelines may include a medicinal product registered in the territory of the Russian Federation used in accordance with indications (characteristics) of the medicinal product not specified in its instructions for use, provided that such medicinal product complies with the requirements established by the Government of the Russian Federation. The list of diseases or conditions (groups of diseases or conditions) for which the use of a medicinal product in accordance with indications (characteristics) not specified in its instructions for use is permitted shall be established by the Government of the Russian Federation."
Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1180-r dated May 16, 2022 "List of diseases or conditions (groups of diseases or conditions) in which the use of a medicinal product is permitted in accordance with the indications (characteristics) of the medicinal product not specified in the instructions for its use."
Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1799 dated October 27, 2023, "On Approval of Requirements for a Medicinal Product Registered in the Territory of the Russian Federation Used in Accordance with Indications (Characteristics) of the Medicinal Product Not Specified in Its Instructions for Use, the Inclusion of Which is Permitted in Standards of Medical Care for Children and Clinical Guidelines".
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1008n dated September 23, 2020, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Patients with Therapeutic Nutrition" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on September 30, 2020, Registration No. 60137).
7. Additional Information
It is recommended to refer children to the ITU bureau (medico-social expertise bureau) to obtain the status of "disabled child". The diagnosis upon referral for MSE is established in accordance with the recommendations (see section 1.5).
Assignment of the status of "disabled child" to children with JIA is carried out in accordance with the following regulatory and legal documents:
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 588 dated April 5, 2022 (as amended on March 12, 2024) "On Recognition of a Person as Disabled" (as amended by Decrees of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2121 dated November 23, 2022, No. 77 dated January 24, 2023, No. 1887 dated November 10, 2023, No. 2003 dated November 28, 2023, No. 289 dated April 12, 2024).
Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 585n dated August 27, 2019 (as amended on November 6, 2021) "On Classifications and Criteria Used in Carrying Out Medico-Social Expertise of Citizens by Federal State Institutions of Medico-Social Expertise"
Subclause 5.2.105 of the Regulations on the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation, approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 610 dated June 19, 2012 (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2012, No. 26, Art. 3528; 2013, No. 22, Art. 2809; No. 36, Art. 4578; No. 37, Art. 4703; No. 45, Art. 5822; No. 46, Art. 5952; 2014, No. 21, Art. 2710; No. 26, Art. 3577; No. 29, Art. 4160; No. 32, Art. 4499; No. 36, Art. 4868; 2015, No. 2, Art. 491; No. 6, Art. 963; No. 16, Art. 2384; 2016, No. 2, Art. 325; No. 4, Art. 534; No. 23, Art. 3322; No. 28, Art. 4741; No. 29, Art. 4812; No. 43, Art. 6038; No. 47, Art. 6659; 2017, No. 1, Art. 187; No. 7, Art. 1093; No. 17, Art. 2581; No. 22, Art. 3149; No. 28, Art. 4167; 2018, No. 10, Art. 1494; No. 24, Art. 3530; No. 36, Art. 5634; No. 46, Art. 7052; No. 49, Art. 7600; No. 53, Art. 8678; 2019, No. 1, Art. 31; No. 5, Art. 408; No. 21, Art. 2563)
Appendix No. 2 to the classifications and criteria used in carrying out medico-social expertise by federal state institutions of medico-social expertise, approved by Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 585n dated August 27, 2019
Quantitative scoring system for the severity of persistent impairments of body functions in children under 18 years of age caused by diseases, consequences of injuries, or defects (in percentages, applied to the clinical and functional characteristics of persistent impairments of human body functions)
If the "disabled child" status is granted, the child and their parents will be entitled to a number of social services; preferential travel; benefits for medical devices, instruments, and medications; benefits for admission to secondary and higher educational institutions; free travel for the child and an accompanying adult to the place of treatment (sanatorium, resort) and back; an annual sanatorium-treatment voucher for the child and the accompanying adult.
In the event of delayed provision of pathogenetic biologic therapy to a child with systemic JIA, there is a high probability of disease flare/increased activity, development of multiorgan failure, progression of joint damage, and functional impairment in the patient.
7.1 Outcomes and prognosis
In 40% of patients, the disease follows a monocyclic course with full recovery after a certain period. Individual patients experience a polycyclic course of systemic JIA, characterized by episodes of disease activity and drug-free remission periods. In 50% of children, the disease has a persistent course with progressive polyarthritis and functional impairment. Patients receiving long-term glucocorticoids also develop complications from hormonal therapy. Remission is achieved in 1/3 of patients. Mortality is 1% in Europe and <0.5% in North America. Macrophage activation syndrome remains a severe and potentially fatal complication. Death may occur due to neurological and cardiological complications [1,3,7].
Poor prognostic factors (ACR, 2021) [6,16,326]
— In systemic JIA without active articular syndrome: active systemic disease manifestations for 6 months (fever, elevated laboratory parameters), need for repeated systemic glucocorticoid therapy; recurrent macrophage activation syndrome.
— In systemic JIA with active articular syndrome without active systemic manifestations: involvement of the hip joints, cervical spine, wrist joints, and/or joint destruction according to radiological imaging (erosions of articular surfaces, narrowing of joint spaces).
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
Organizational and technical conditions for the provision of medical care.
Type of medical care | Specialized medical care |
|---|---|
Conditions of medical care | Inpatient / in a day hospital |
Form of medical care | Elective |
Table 1. Criteria for assessing the quality of initial diagnosis for establishing the diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Diagnostics, including differential diagnosis, performed in all patients with suspected systemic JIA in a rheumatology inpatient setting | C |
2 | A detailed general (clinical) blood test was performed (study of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, study of red blood cell level in blood, study of white blood cell level in blood, study of platelet level in blood, differential leukocyte count (leukocyte formula), study of total hemoglobin level in blood) | C |
3 | Prothrombin index determination, soluble fibrin monomer complexes (SFMC) blood test, prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time in blood, protein C level blood test, protein S activity blood test, plasminogen level blood test, fibrinogen level blood test, D-dimer blood concentration determination, von Willebrand factor activity and properties blood test, antithrombin III activity blood test | C |
4 | Performed thromboelastography | C |
5 | ABO blood group typing, determination of subgroups and minor blood groups A-1, A-2, D, Cc, E, Kell, Duffy, and Rhesus D antigen (Rh factor) determination were performed prior to invasive procedures (esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy with biopsy, bone marrow puncture aspiration, cytological examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints, bone biopsy) | C |
6 | Blood total protein test, blood albumin test, blood total bilirubin test, blood free and conjugated bilirubin test, blood creatinine test, blood urea test, blood uric acid test, blood glucose test, blood ferritin test, blood triglycerides test, blood cholesterol test, blood sodium test, blood potassium test, blood total calcium test, blood lactate dehydrogenase activity determination, blood aspartate aminotransferase activity determination, blood alanine aminotransferase activity determination, blood gamma-glutamyltransferase activity determination, blood alkaline phosphatase activity determination, blood serum iron test, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol test, cholesterol test, blood creatine kinase activity determination, blood pancreatic amylase activity determination, blood lipase activity determination | C |
7 | A study of the C-reactive protein level in blood serum was performed | C |
8 | A study of immunoglobulin levels in blood was performed | C |
9 | Determination of HLA antigens (HLA-B27 antigen) | C |
10 | Determination of autoantibodies to cell nuclei and DNA in blood; determination of rheumatoid factor (RF) in blood; determination of markers for ANCA-associated vasculitis: PR3 (c-ANCA), MPO (p-ANCA); determination of anticentromere antibodies in blood; determination of anti-RNA antibodies in blood; determination of antibodies to cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) in blood; determination of antinuclear antibodies to Sm antigen in blood; determination of antibodies to RNA polymerase (Ro antigen) and RNA-associated protein (La antigen) in blood; determination of antiphospholipid antibodies in blood; determination of anticardiolipin antibodies in blood; determination of anti-beta-2-glycoprotein antibodies in blood; determination of anti-Scl-70 antibodies in blood; C3 and C4 complement fraction levels test | C |
11 | Antistreptolysin-O blood serum test | C |
12 | Blood procalcitonin level testing | C |
13 | Lymphocyte subset analysis performed | C |
14 | Comprehensive diagnostic testing for cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes and other autoinflammatory syndromes | C |
15 | General (clinical) urinalysis, urine albumin determination, 24-hour urine protein quantification | C |
16 | Focal tuberculin skin test (Mantoux test, test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen in standard dilution**) and blood interferon-gamma release assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens | C |
17 | Performed determination of classes A, M, G antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci in blood; determination of antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae in blood, determination of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in blood | C |
18 | Performed determination of antibodies to Salmonella enterica in blood, determination of antibodies to Salmonella typhi in blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in blood, determination of antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica serovars in blood | C |
19 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella boydii in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella dysenteriae in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella sonnei in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella flexneri in the blood was performed | C |
20 | Determination of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of tick-borne borreliosis agents of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group in the blood by PCR; determination of class M antibodies (IgM) to tick-borne borreliosis agents of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group in the blood; determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to tick-borne borreliosis agents of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group in the blood, determination of total antibodies to tick-borne borreliosis agents of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato group in the blood in patients with a history of visiting a forest, living in tick-endemic areas, or a tick bite, for the purpose of ruling out borreliosis was performed | C |
21 | Performed Epstein-Barr virus DNA determination by PCR in peripheral and cord blood, quantitative assay; Epstein-Barr virus DNA determination in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs by PCR, qualitative assay; Epstein-Barr virus DNA determination in urine by PCR, qualitative assay | C |
22 | Performed Cytomegalovirus DNA determination by PCR in peripheral and cord blood, quantitative assay; Cytomegalovirus DNA determination in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs by PCR, qualitative assay; Cytomegalovirus DNA determination in urine by PCR, qualitative assay | C |
23 | Determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in the blood, quantitative study, determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs, qualitative study, determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in urine, qualitative study was performed | C |
24 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus) in the blood was performed | C |
25 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
26 | Determination of antibodies to capsid antigen (VCA) of Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
27 | Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to early antigens (EA) of Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
28 | Determination of antibodies to herpes simplex virus (Herpes simplex virus) in the blood was performed | C |
29 | Molecular biological study of blood for Toxoplasma gondii in patients with a history of animal contact was performed | C |
30 | Blood tests for Leishmania antibodies were performed in patients with a history of travel to endemic areas | C |
31 | Molecular biological study of blood for hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C virus) and molecular biological study of blood for hepatitis B virus (Hepatitis B virus) in all patients with clinical and laboratory signs of hepatitis was performed | C |
32 | Determination of antibodies to surface antigen (HBsAg) of hepatitis B virus (Hepatitis B virus) and determination of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C virus) in the blood in all patients with clinical and laboratory signs of hepatitis was performed | C |
33 | Blood tests for antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 and HIV-2 were performed in patients with signs of immunodeficiency | C |
34 | Microbiological (culture) examination of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal wall mucus for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms performed | C |
35 | Microbiological (culture) blood test for sterility, microbiological (culture) urine test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic microorganisms performed | C |
36 | Fecal calprotectin level testing was performed | C |
37 | Comprehensive ultrasound examination (ultrasound) of internal organs (includes comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, kidney ultrasound) was performed | C |
38 | Echocardiography performed | C |
39 | Electrocardiogram recording performed | C |
40 | Joint ultrasound examination performed | C |
41 | Radiography of the temporomandibular joint and/or intervertebral joints, and/or elbow joint, and/or wrist joint, and/or knee joint, and/or shoulder joint, and/or hip joint, and/or ankle joint, and/or acromioclavicular joint, and/or sternoclavicular joint, and/or hand, and/or foot in two projections, or joint computed tomography with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) performed in all patients with joint involvement | C |
42 | Magnetic resonance imaging of joints (single joint) with contrast enhancement using anesthesia management (including early postoperative management) or without it was performed in patients with arthritis | A |
43 | Computed tomography of a joint using anesthesia management (including early postoperative management) or without it was performed in patients with mono- or oligoarthritis and atypical MRI changes for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis | C |
44 | Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) performed | C |
45 | Microbiological (culture) examination of gastric mucosa biopsy specimens for Helicobacter pylori was performed in patients with inflammatory and/or erosive and/or ulcerative changes according to esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings | C |
46 | Esophagoscopy with biopsy, gastroscopy with biopsy, duodenoscopy with biopsy, and jejunoscopy with biopsy in the presence of inflammatory and/or erosive and/or ulcerative mucosal changes, with or without anesthesia management (including early postoperative management), accompanied by pathomorphological examination of the esophageal, gastric, duodenal, and jejunal biopsy (surgical) material, were performed in patients with inflammatory and/or erosive and/or ulcerative mucosal changes | C |
47 | Colonoscopy with anesthesia management (including early postoperative management), colonic biopsy, and pathomorphological examination of the colonic biopsy (surgical) material was performed in patients with febrile syndrome and/or clinical manifestations of intestinal lesions, and/or elevated fecal calprotectin levels | C |
48 | Video capsule small bowel endoscopy was performed in patients with clinical signs of inflammatory bowel disease and/or elevated fecal calprotectin levels in the absence of abnormalities on esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy | C |
49 | Performed computed tomography of the chest organs with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) | C |
50 | Performed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal organs, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the retroperitoneal space, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic organs with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) | C |
51 | Computed tomography of the abdominal organs with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement, and computed tomography of the retroperitoneal space with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement, with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management), were performed when MRI was contraindicated | C |
52 | Bone marrow aspiration for cytological preparation and bone marrow trephine biopsy for histological preparation using anesthesia management (including early postoperative management), with cytological examination of bone marrow smear (myelogram) and pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods, were performed | C |
53 | Lymph node biopsy (peripheral, or intra-abdominal/intrathoracic as indicated) performed under anesthesia (including early postoperative management), including cytological examination of lymph node tissue preparation and pathomorphological examination of lymph node biopsy (surgical) material in patients with marked enlargement of peripheral and/or intrathoracic, and/or intra-abdominal lymph nodes | C |
54 | Performed positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)) with contrast enhancement if necessary; whole-body positron emission tomography using tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals (V09)) with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) in patients with severe arthralgia, myalgia, ossalgia, bone destruction, subcutaneous adipose tissue infiltrates, and focal lesions in parenchymal organs, the brain, or the spinal cord | C |
55 | Multi-site bone scintigraphy using anesthesia management (including early postoperative management) or without it was performed in patients with bone destruction lesions atypical for juvenile arthritis | C |
56 | CT-guided pelvic bone trephine biopsy using anesthesia management (including early postoperative management), with pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods, cytological examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints, immunocytochemical examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints, and immunophenotyping of hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow, was performed in patients with an atypical course of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis | C |
57 | Bone biopsy using anesthesia management (including early postoperative management), with pathomorphological examination of bone tissue biopsy (surgical) material, was performed in patients with bone destruction lesions atypical for juvenile arthritis | C |
58 | Performed initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a pediatric oncologist in patients with suspected oncological or onco-hematological disease based on examination results | C |
59 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a phthisiatrician was performed in patients with a positive focal tuberculin skin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculosis allergen, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or infiltrative pulmonary lesions | C |
60 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by an orthopedic traumatologist was performed in patients with space-occupying and destructive lesions, as well as bone deformities atypical for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis | C |
61 | Performed initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by an otorhinolaryngologist | C |
62 | Performed initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by an ophthalmologist with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy | C |
63 | Performed initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a pediatric dentist | C |
64 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a neurologist was performed in patients with neurological symptoms, severe pain syndrome, psychomotor retardation, and psychotic reactions | C |
65 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by an audiologist-otorhinolaryngologist and audiometry were performed in patients with suspected autoinflammatory syndromes | C |
66 | Performed initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a geneticist in patients with multiple minor developmental anomalies, connective tissue dysplasia syndrome, and suspected autoinflammatory syndromes | C |
67 | Initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist was performed in all patients scheduled for procedures under general anesthesia | C |
68 | Initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist was performed in all critically ill patients | C |
69 | Daily monitoring by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist was performed for all critically ill patients (multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, macrophage activation syndrome) | C |
70 | Performed initial examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist in all patients aged 1 year and older and their parents (regardless of the child's age) | A |
Table 2. Diagnostic quality criteria for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Diagnostics, including differential diagnostics, was performed in all patients with suspected hemophagocytic syndrome in a rheumatology inpatient setting | C |
2 | A detailed general (clinical) blood test was performed (study of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, study of red blood cell level in blood, study of white blood cell level in blood, study of platelet level in blood, differential leukocyte count (leukocyte formula), study of total hemoglobin level in blood) | C |
3 | Determination of prothrombin index, study of soluble fibrin monomer complexes in the blood, determination of prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, determination of activated partial thromboplastin time, determination of thrombin time in the blood, study of protein C level in the blood, determination of protein S activity in the blood, study of plasminogen level in the blood, study of fibrinogen level in the blood, determination of D-dimer concentration in the blood, study of von Willebrand factor activity and properties in the blood, determination of antithrombin III activity in the blood were performed | C |
4 | Performed thromboelastography | C |
5 | Blood heparin level testing | C |
6 | Blood total protein test, blood albumin test, blood total bilirubin test, blood free and conjugated bilirubin test, blood creatinine test, blood urea test, blood uric acid test, blood glucose test, blood ferritin test, blood triglycerides test, blood cholesterol test, blood sodium test, blood potassium test, blood total calcium test, blood lactate dehydrogenase activity assay, blood aspartate aminotransferase activity assay, blood alanine aminotransferase activity assay, blood gamma-glutamyl transferase activity assay, blood alkaline phosphatase activity assay, blood serum iron test, blood creatine kinase activity assay, blood pancreatic amylase activity assay, blood lipase activity assay | C |
7 | A study of the C-reactive protein level in blood serum was performed | C |
8 | Microbiological (cultural) blood test for sterility, microbiological (cultural) test of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal swabs for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, microbiological (cultural) urine test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic pathogens, and microbiological (cultural) stool test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms with antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed | C |
9 | Determination of class A, M, G antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci in blood; determination of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in blood; determination of antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae in blood; determination of class M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in blood | C |
10 | Determination of Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
11 | Performed Epstein-Barr virus DNA determination by PCR in peripheral and cord blood, quantitative assay; Epstein-Barr virus DNA determination in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs by PCR, qualitative assay; Epstein-Barr virus DNA determination in urine by PCR, qualitative assay | C |
12 | Performed Cytomegalovirus DNA determination by PCR in peripheral and cord blood, quantitative assay; Cytomegalovirus DNA determination in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs by PCR, qualitative assay; Cytomegalovirus DNA determination in urine by PCR, qualitative assay | C |
13 | Determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in the blood, quantitative study, determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs, qualitative study, determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in urine, qualitative study was performed | C |
14 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus) in the blood was performed | C |
15 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
16 | Determination of antibodies to capsid antigen (VCA) of Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
17 | Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to early antigens (EA) of Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
18 | Determination of antibodies to herpes simplex virus (Herpes simplex virus) in the blood was performed | C |
19 | Microbiological (cultural) test of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms using automated seeding with antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed upon detection of interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to chest computed tomography | C |
20 | Determination of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
21 | Determination of Cytomegalovirus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
22 | Quantitative determination of Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in sputum, endotracheal aspirate, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
23 | Determination of class M and G antibodies to Pneumocystis jirovecii in blood when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
24 | Microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis carinii cysts when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
25 | Microbiological (cultural) test of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeast and mycelial) was performed upon detection of interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes according to chest computed tomography | C |
26 | Determination of Candida albicans mannan antigen and Aspergillus spp. galactomannan antigen in blood serum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
27 | Determination of Candida albicans mannan antigen and Aspergillus spp. galactomannan antigen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) when interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes are detected on chest computed tomography | C |
28 | Blood procalcitonin level testing | C |
29 | General (clinical) urinalysis, urinary albumin determination, and 24-hour urinary protein quantification have been performed | C |
30 | A comprehensive ultrasound examination of internal organs (including comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and renal ultrasound) was performed | C |
31 | Echocardiography performed | C |
32 | Electrocardiogram recording performed | C |
33 | Performed computed tomography of the chest organs with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) | C |
34 | Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) was performed in patients with neurological symptoms | C |
35 | Magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal cavity, retroperitoneal space, and pelvic organs with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) was performed in patients who developed multiorgan failure | C |
36 | Obtaining a bone marrow cytologic preparation by puncture with anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) and a bone marrow histologic preparation with bone marrow smear cytologic examination (myelogram) and pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material was performed | C |
37 | Performed initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a neurologist in patients with neurological symptoms | C |
38 | Initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for patients scheduled for procedures under general anesthesia | C |
39 | Initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for patients in severe/critical condition | C |
40 | Daily monitoring by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for patients with pancytopenia, single-organ and multiple-organ failure, and central nervous system damage | C |
41 | Initial admission (examination, consultation) by an ophthalmologist for patients with hemorrhagic syndrome | C |
Table 3. Criteria for assessing the quality of examination of patients with an established diagnosis of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis prior to the initiation/adjustment of antirheumatic therapy
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Examination performed prior to the initiation/adjustment of therapy in all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sJIA, active stage, in a rheumatology inpatient setting | C |
2 | A detailed general (clinical) blood test was performed (study of erythrocyte sedimentation rate, study of red blood cell level in blood, study of white blood cell level in blood, study of platelet level in blood, differential leukocyte count (leukocyte formula), study of total hemoglobin level in blood) | C |
3 | Prothrombin index determination, soluble fibrin monomer complexes (SFMC) blood test, prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time in blood, protein C level blood test, protein S activity blood test, plasminogen level blood test, fibrinogen level blood test, D-dimer blood concentration determination, von Willebrand factor activity and properties blood test, antithrombin III activity blood test | C |
4 | Blood heparin level testing | C |
5 | Performed thromboelastography | C |
6 | Blood total protein test, blood albumin test, blood total bilirubin test, blood free and conjugated bilirubin test, blood creatinine test, blood urea test, blood uric acid test, blood glucose test, blood ferritin test, blood triglycerides test, blood cholesterol test, blood sodium test, blood potassium test, blood total calcium test, blood lactate dehydrogenase activity assay, blood aspartate aminotransferase activity assay, blood alanine aminotransferase activity assay, blood gamma-glutamyl transferase activity assay, blood alkaline phosphatase activity assay, blood serum iron test, blood creatine kinase activity assay, blood pancreatic amylase activity assay, blood lipase activity assay | C |
7 | Blood procalcitonin level measurement was performed in all patients with fever | C |
8 | A study of the C-reactive protein level in blood serum was performed | C |
9 | Lymphocyte subset analysis performed in all patients receiving #rituximab**, as well as in patients with a high frequency of viral and purulent bacterial infections, including opportunistic infections | C |
10 | Determination of anti-nuclear and anti-DNA antibodies in blood | C |
11 | Antistreptolysin-O blood serum test | C |
12 | Determination of main AB0 blood groups, subgroups and other minor blood groups A-1, A-2, D, Cc, E, Kell, Duffy, and Rhesus D antigen (Rh factor) determination in all patients prior to invasive procedures (esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy with biopsy, kidney biopsy) or blood transfusions | C |
13 | Focal tuberculin skin test (Mantoux test, test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen in standard dilution**) and blood interferon-gamma release assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens | C |
14 | Performed determination of antibodies to Salmonella enterica in blood, determination of antibodies to Salmonella typhi in blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in blood, determination of antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica serovars in blood | C |
15 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella boydii in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella dysenteriae in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella sonnei in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella flexneri in the blood was performed | C |
16 | Determination of class A, M, G antibodies (IgA, IgM, IgG) to Chlamydia psittaci in blood; determination of antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis in blood; determination of antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae in blood; determination of class M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in blood | C |
17 | Performed Epstein-Barr virus DNA determination by PCR in peripheral and cord blood, quantitative assay; Epstein-Barr virus DNA determination in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs by PCR, qualitative assay; Epstein-Barr virus DNA determination in urine by PCR, qualitative assay | C |
18 | Cytomegalovirus DNA quantitative PCR in peripheral and cord blood, qualitative Cytomegalovirus DNA PCR in oropharyngeal swabs, and qualitative Cytomegalovirus DNA PCR in urine | C |
19 | Determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in the blood, quantitative study, determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs, qualitative study, determination of herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 (Herpes simplex virus types 1, 2) DNA by PCR in urine, qualitative study was performed | C |
20 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus) in the blood was performed | C |
21 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
22 | Determination of antibodies to capsid antigen (VCA) of Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
23 | Determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to early antigens (EA) of Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus) in the blood was performed | C |
24 | Determination of antibodies to herpes simplex virus (Herpes simplex virus) in the blood was performed | C |
25 | Microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis carinii cysts in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
26 | Quantitative determination of Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in sputum, endotracheal aspirate, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
27 | Determination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA (M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG) with species differentiation in sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, or bronchial washings by PCR in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
28 | Determination of Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
29 | Determination of Cytomegalovirus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
30 | Microbiological (culture) examination of sputum for fungi (yeasts and molds) in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
31 | Microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeasts and molds) in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
32 | Microbiological (culture) examination of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms was performed in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography | C |
33 | Determination of antibodies to Aspergillus spp. in blood in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
34 | Determination of mannan and galactomannan in lavage fluid and blood was performed in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography | C |
35 | Microbiological (culture) examination of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal swabs for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms was performed | C |
36 | Microbiological (cultural) blood test for sterility, and microbiological (cultural) urine test for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic microorganisms were performed in patients with febrile and hectic fever | C |
37 | General (clinical) urinalysis, urinary albumin determination, and 24-hour urinary protein quantification have been performed | C |
38 | Nechyporenko urine test performed | C |
39 | Comprehensive ultrasound examination (ultrasound) of internal organs (includes comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, kidney ultrasound) was performed | C |
40 | Echocardiography performed | C |
41 | Electrocardiogram recording performed | C |
42 | Holter heart rhythm monitoring was performed in patients with arrhythmia and electrocardiographic abnormalities | C |
43 | Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed in patients with arterial hypertension | C |
44 | Joint ultrasound has been performed in patients with active arthritis | C |
45 | X-ray of the temporomandibular joint and/or intervertebral joints, and/or elbow joint, and/or wrist joint, and/or knee joint, and/or shoulder joint, and/or hip joint, and/or ankle joint, and/or acromioclavicular joint, and/or sternoclavicular joint, and/or hand, and/or foot in two projections, or computed tomography of the joint with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), performed in patients with active arthritis | C |
46 | Magnetic resonance imaging of joints (single joint) with contrast enhancement, with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), performed in all patients with active arthritis | A |
47 | Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast enhancement using anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) or without it performed in patients with neurological symptoms | C |
48 | Magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominal cavity with intravenous contrast, magnetic resonance imaging of the retroperitoneal space with intravenous contrast, and magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic organs with intravenous contrast, with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management), were performed | C |
49 | Computed tomography of the abdominal cavity with intravenous bolus contrast and computed tomography of the retroperitoneal space with intravenous bolus contrast, with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management), were performed in the presence of contraindications to MRI | C |
50 | Esophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) performed | C |
51 | Gastric/duodenal biopsy via endoscopy with pathomorphological examination of the gastric biopsy (surgical) material and microbiological (culture) examination of gastric mucosa biopsy specimens for Helicobacter pylori in the presence of inflammatory and/or erosive, and/or ulcerative changes of the mucous membrane | C |
52 | Bronchoscopy with anesthetic management (including early postoperative management) was performed in patients with lung involvement | C |
53 | Performed computed tomography of the chest organs with or without anesthetic care (including early postoperative management) | C |
54 | X-ray densitometry performed in patients currently or previously receiving GCs | C |
55 | Respiratory flowmetry performed in all patients with pulmonary involvement | C |
56 | Performed initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by an otorhinolaryngologist | C |
57 | Performed initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a pediatric dentist | C |
58 | Performed initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by an ophthalmologist with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy | C |
59 | Initial pediatric cardiology examination (consultation, assessment) performed for patients with cardiac dysfunction and/or arterial hypertension | C |
60 | Initial examination (consultation, assessment) by a phthisiologist performed for patients with a positive focal tuberculin test and/or intradermal tuberculin allergen test, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels specific to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or focal or infiltrative lung changes | C |
61 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a pediatric endocrinologist was performed in patients with comorbid endocrinological pathology, including steroid diabetes | C |
62 | Initial examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist performed for patients aged 1 year and older and their parents | A |
63 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a neurologist was performed in patients with neurological symptoms, psychomotor developmental delay, and psychotic reactions | C |
64 | Initial clinical nutrition consultation (examination, assessment) performed for patients with underweight, amyotrophy, osteopenia/osteoporosis, constitutional obesity, Cushing's syndrome, and steroid diabetes | C |
65 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a traumatologist-orthopedist was performed in patients with functional joint insufficiency, impaired longitudinal bone growth, subluxations, and back pain | C |
66 | Initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist was performed in all patients scheduled for procedures under general anesthesia | C |
67 | Initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist was performed in all critically ill patients | C |
68 | Continuous daily monitoring by an anesthesiologist-reanimatologist performed for all patients in severe/critical condition (multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, macrophage activation syndrome) | C |
Table 4. Quality assessment criteria for the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis with active systemic manifestations and varying degrees of arthritis activity
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Pathogenetic therapy prescribed in the inpatient rheumatology department for all patients following diagnostic workup, including differential diagnosis, and establishment/confirmation of the systemic JIA diagnosis | C |
2 | Monotherapy with NSAIDs prescribed for a duration of no more than 1 month during the diagnostic phase for patients with an unconfirmed diagnosis of systemic JIA | C |
3 | NSAIDs prescribed for a duration of no more than 1 month during the diagnostic phase for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of systemic JIA | C |
4 | NSAIDs prescribed for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of systemic JIA | C |
5 | Oral and/or intravenous and/or intra-articular glucocorticoids, and/or immunosuppressants (methotrexate**, #leflunomide**), and/or bDMARDs (tocilizumab**, or canakinumab**, or anakinra**, or #adalimumab**, or #etanercept**, or #golimumab**, or #rituximab**, or #abatacept**), and/or targeted synthetic immunosuppressants (#tofacitinib** or #upadacitinib**) were NOT prescribed prior to completion of a full laboratory and instrumental workup, exclusion of oncological and hemato-oncological diseases, and establishment of a systemic JIA diagnosis | C |
6 | Glucocorticoids prescribed for life-threatening systemic manifestations (persistent febrile or hectic fever and/or carditis, and/or pneumonitis, and/or serositis) | C |
7 | Pulse therapy with #methylprednisolone** administered intravenously at a dose of 10–30 mg/kg per infusion for 3 days, or 5 consecutive days if necessary, in the event of life-threatening systemic manifestations (persistent febrile/hectic fever, serositis, mono-/multiorgan failure) | C |
8 | #Prednisolone** prescribed orally at a dose of 1–1.5–2 mg/kg/day or #methylprednisolone** at a dose equivalent to prednisolone (not exceeding 60 mg/day) with subsequent gradual tapering to a maintenance dose (0.2–0.3 mg/kg/day) in patients with refractory or complicated systemic JIA (including those with serositis and/or lung involvement) | C |
9 | Intra-articular administration of #betamethasone** performed in children older than 3 years in accordance with the instructions for use, or #triamcinolone** in children older than 12 years at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg (maximum dose 80 mg) for knee injections, 0.5–1 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) for ankle and elbow injections, and 0.3–0.5 mg/kg (maximum dose 40 mg) for wrist joints and small joints of the hands and feet in patients with active mono- or oligoarthritis no more frequently than once every 4 months | C |
10 | Methotrexate** prescribed at a dose of 15 mg/m2/week subcutaneously (maximum 25 mg/week) once weekly in the presence of active arthritis | C |
11 | #Folic acid** prescribed at a dose of 1 mg daily except on the day of methotrexate administration, or 2.5–7.5 mg once weekly orally during the period of methotrexate** therapy | C |
12 | Switching to #leflunomide** performed in case of intolerance and/or inefficacy of oral methotrexate** in children with active arthritis: body weight < 20 kg – 10 mg once daily every other day; body weight 20–40 kg – 10 mg daily; body weight > 40 kg – 20 mg daily | C |
13 | Tocilizumab** prescribed as monotherapy or in combination with oral and/or intravenous GCs for children with body weight <30 kg at a dose of 12 mg/kg per infusion, children with body weight ≥ 30 kg at a dose of 8 mg/kg per infusion intravenously once every 2 weeks; for children with body weight <30 kg at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks, and for children with body weight ≥ 30 kg at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once weekly in the absence of active arthritis | B, B |
14 | Tocilizumab** prescribed in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide**, with or without oral and/or intravenous GCs, for children with body weight <30 kg at a dose of 12 mg/kg per infusion, children with body weight ≥ 30 kg at a dose of 8 mg/kg per infusion intravenously once every 2 weeks; for children with body weight <30 kg at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks, and for children with body weight ≥ 30 kg at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once weekly in the presence of active arthritis | B, B, C |
15 | Canakinumab** prescribed at a dose of 4 mg/kg per infusion subcutaneously once every 4 weeks as monotherapy or in combination with oral and/or intravenous GCs in the absence of active arthritis | C |
16 | Canakinumab** prescribed at a dose of 4 mg/kg per infusion subcutaneously once every 4 weeks in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide**, with or without oral and/or intravenous GCs, in the presence of active arthritis | B, C |
17 | Anakinra** prescribed for children with body weight ≥ 50 kg at a dose of 100 mg/day subcutaneously daily; for children with body weight <50 kg at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg/day subcutaneously daily as monotherapy or in combination with oral and/or intravenous GCs in the absence of active arthritis | C |
18 | Anakinra** prescribed for active arthritis in children with body weight ≥ 50 kg at a dose of 100 mg/day subcutaneously daily; for children with body weight <50 kg at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg/day subcutaneously daily in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide**, with or without oral and/or intravenous GCs, in the presence of active arthritis | C |
19 | Switching to a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug with a different mechanism of action performed if the patient fails to achieve 50% improvement according to the ACRpedi criteria at 3 months or a state of inactive disease according to C. Wallace criteria at 6 months, or at any stage of treatment in case of persistent fever or increasing disease activity during monotherapy with tocilizumab**, canakinumab**, or anakinra**, or in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide** | C |
20 | Switching to a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug with a different mechanism of action performed at any stage of treatment in case of intolerance to tocilizumab**, canakinumab**, or anakinra** | C |
21 | Canakinumab** prescribed at a dose of 4 mg/kg per infusion subcutaneously once every 4 weeks, or anakinra** prescribed for children with body weight ≥ 50 kg at a dose of 100 mg/day subcutaneously daily and for children with body weight <50 kg at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg/day subcutaneously daily, with or without methotrexate** or #leflunomide**, in case of inefficacy and/or intolerance to tocilizumab** | C |
22 | Tocilizumab** prescribed for children with body weight ≥ 30 kg at a dose of 8 mg/kg per infusion intravenously once every 2 weeks or at a dose of 162 mg subcutaneously once weekly; for children with body weight <30 kg at a dose of 12 mg/kg per infusion intravenously or 162 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks, with or without methotrexate** or #leflunomide**, in case of inefficacy and/or intolerance to canakinumab** or anakinra** | C, C |
23 | #Rituximab** prescribed at a dose of 375 mg/m2 of body surface area intravenously once weekly for 4 consecutive weeks in case of inefficacy/intolerance of monotherapy with tocilizumab**, canakinumab**, or anakinra**, or in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide** | C, C |
24 | #Rituximab** prescribed in combination with #co-trimoxazole** at a dose of 5 mg/kg based on trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily | C |
25 | Switching to tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors performed in the event of systemic remission lasting for at least one year and relapsing arthritis during therapy with tocilizumab**, canakinumab**, or anakinra** in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide** | A, C |
26 | #Adalimumab** prescribed for children ≥ 2 years with a body weight of 15–30 kg at a dose of 20 mg; body weight > 30 kg at a dose of 40 mg subcutaneously once every 2 weeks; or #etanercept** at a dose of 0.2–0.4 mg/kg per infusion twice a week or 0.8 mg/kg per infusion once a week; or #golimumab** for children ≥ 2 years at a dose of 30 mg/m3; ≥ 40 kg (maximum 50 mg) subcutaneously once every 4 weeks in combination with methotrexate** or #leflunomide**, or as monotherapy | C |
27 | An additional prescription of #tofacitinib** at a dose of 2.5–5 mg twice daily orally was administered to patients with a refractory course of sJIA (with active systemic manifestations and/or arthritis) in combination with tocilizumab**, or canakinumab**, or anakinra**, or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors with or without methotrexate** or #leflunomide** | B, C |
28 | A prescription of #upadacitinib** in patients over 12 years of age with a body weight of ≥40 kg at a dose of 15 mg/day orally was administered for a refractory course of sJIA (with active systemic manifestations and/or arthritis) against the background of therapy with tocilizumab**, or canakinumab**, or anakinra**, or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors with or without methotrexate**, or without #leflunomide** | C, C |
29 | A prescription of #abatacept** at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration according to the schedule at weeks 0, 2, and 4, and then every 4 weeks was administered for a refractory course of articular syndrome without active systemic manifestations against the background of therapy with tocilizumab**, or canakinumab**, or anakinra*, or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors, or #tofacitinib**, or #upadacitinib** with or without methotrexate** or #leflunomide** | B, C |
30 | Monitoring of the efficacy of any medicinal product used for pathogenetic therapy was performed at 3 and 6 months, and then every 6 months of therapy (the drug is considered effective upon achieving a 50% improvement according to the ACRpedi criteria at 3 months, or the inactive disease stage at 6 months, or remission at 12 months according to C. Wallace criteria) | C |
31 | Therapy adjustment (drug switching) was performed until efficacy or minimal/low disease activity was achieved in patients with long-standing disease, regardless of the drug used | C |
32 | Switching to another selective immunosuppressant (Janus kinase inhibitor) and/or generic was performed exclusively for medical indications; automatic switching was not performed for the purpose of maintaining disease remission and preventing the development of adverse events | C |
33 | Switching to another genetically engineered biologic drug and/or biosimilar was performed exclusively for medical indications; automatic switching was not performed for the purpose of maintaining disease remission, preventing the formation of neutralizing antibodies, and developing adverse events | C |
Table 5. Quality assessment criteria for the treatment of systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis complicated by macrophage activation syndrome
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Therapy was prescribed and administered in a rheumatological inpatient setting for all patients after diagnostics, including differential diagnostics, and establishment/confirmation of the diagnosis of sJIA with macrophage activation syndrome | C |
2 | Prescription of targeted etiotropic therapy with systemic antibacterial and/or systemic antifungal and/or systemic antiviral drugs performed in patients with a known infectious etiological factor | C |
3 | Glucocorticoids were prescribed in combination with #cyclosporine** and #normal human immunoglobulin** | C |
4 | Pulse therapy with #methylprednisolone** at a dose of 20–30 mg/kg/administration intravenously or prescription of #dexamethasone** at a dose of 10–20 mg/m²/day intravenously was performed | C |
5 | A gradual dose reduction of intravenous glucocorticoids was performed after the relief of clinical and laboratory signs of MAS according to the following regimens: #dexamethasone** starting from an initial dose of 10–20 mg/m2/day for 1–2 weeks, 5–10 mg/m2/day for 3–4 weeks, 2.5–5 mg/m2/day for 5–6 weeks, 1.25–2.5 mg/m2/day for 7–8 weeks; #methylprednisolone** starting from an initial dose of 20–30 mg/kg/administration for 3–5 days with a 25% dose reduction every 2–3 days | C |
6 | A prescription of #cyclosporine** at a dose of 3–5 mg/kg/day intravenously or orally was administered | C |
7 | A prescription of #normal human immunoglobulin** at a dose of 1–2 g/kg/course was administered | C |
8 | Assessment of the efficacy of the applied MAS treatment regimen in accordance with criteria for achieving a therapeutic response (relief of fever, reduction in spleen size, increase in blood platelet count to ≥100 × 109/L, normalization of blood fibrinogen levels, reduction in serum ferritin concentration by 25%) was performed every 48 hours | C |
9 | An additional prescription of #anakinra** 5–10 mg/kg/day intravenously in 2 doses for 3–10 days (or longer if necessary) was administered in case of increasing MAS activity during the first 48 hours of glucocorticoid therapy combined with #cyclosporine** and #normal human immunoglobulin** | C |
10 | An additional prescription of #ruxolitinib** orally was administered to children with a weight up to 10 kg at 2.5 mg twice daily; children with a weight from 10 to 25 kg at 5 mg twice daily; children with a weight > 25 kg at 10 mg twice daily, or #tofacitinib** orally at a dose of 10 mg twice daily in case of inefficacy of the combination of #anakinra** with glucocorticoids, #cyclosporine**, and #normal human immunoglobulin** | C |
11 | Switched to #rituximab** at a dose of 375 mg/m2 per week intravenously for 1-4 consecutive weeks in case of ineffectiveness of the combination #anakinra** with GCs, #cyclosporine**, #normal human immunoglobulin** and #ruxolitinib** or #tofacitinib** | C |
12 | A prescription of #co-trimoxazole** at a dose of 5 mg/kg calculated by trimethoprim orally 3 times a week or daily in combination with #rituximab** was administered | C |
13 | A prescription of #prednisolone** at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg orally or #methylprednisolone** at a dose equivalent to prednisolone was administered in case of inefficacy of combined MAS therapy or MAS reactivation against the background of tapering/withdrawal of intravenous glucocorticoids | C |
14 | A prescription of #acyclovir** was administered to children aged < 1 year at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 8 hours; to children aged ≥ 1 year at a dose of 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 8 hours upon the development of Herpes zoster | C |
15 | A prescription of #acyclovir** at a dose of 5–10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 8 hours for 7–10 days was administered upon the development of herpes infection caused by Herpes simplex virus | C |
16 | A prescription of #ganciclovir** at a dose of 6 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days was administered upon confirmation of active cytomegalovirus infection | C |
17 | A prescription of #ganciclovir** at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14–21 days was administered upon confirmation of active Epstein-Barr virus infection | C |
18 | A prescription of #rituximab** as a first-line genetically engineered biologic drug in combination with #cyclosporine**, #normal human immunoglobulin**, and #co-trimoxazole** was administered for active Epstein-Barr virus infection | C |
19 | Antithrombotic agents were prescribed: drugs from the heparin group or direct factor Xa inhibitors; antiplatelet agents (except heparin); antifibrinolytic agents in case of hypercoagulation or development of coagulopathy | C |
20 | Blood transfusion performed upon the development of consumption coagulopathy or bleeding | C |
21 | Colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** has been administered at a dose of 5–10 μg/kg/day subcutaneously for 3–5 days (longer if necessary) when the absolute neutrophil count decreases to ≤1.0×10⁹/L | C |
22 | Scheduled systemic antibacterial drugs combined with systemic antifungal drugs were prescribed when the absolute neutrophil count dropped to ≤1.0 × 109/L until the resolution of agranulocytosis | C |
23 | Empirical antibacterial therapy with systemic agents active against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic flora, and/or systemic antifungal agents, and/or systemic antiviral agents administered upon the development of sepsis/infectious complications prior to the confirmation of the etiological factor | C |
24 | Targeted therapy prescribed according to microbial susceptibility using systemic antibacterial drugs (combinations of penicillins, including combinations with beta-lactamase inhibitors and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins, and/or carbapenems, and/or other antibacterial drugs, and/or glycopeptide antibiotics, and/or other aminoglycosides) with or without systemic antifungal and/or systemic antiviral drugs upon confirmation of the etiological factor of sepsis/infectious complication | C |
25 | Treatment of MAS was performed until the inactive stage was achieved (absence of fever, splenomegaly, cytopenia [Hb ≥90 g/L, platelets ≥100 × 109/L, neutrophils ≥0.5 × 109/L], blood triglyceride level <3 mmol/L or <265 mg/dL, ferritin ≤500 µg/L, and normalization of cerebrospinal fluid parameters in case of CNS involvement) | C |
Table 6. Quality assessment criteria for dispensary follow-up of patients with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis, including therapy safety monitoring, in an inpatient/day-hospital setting that initiated the prescription of a genetically engineered biologic drug/immunosuppressant
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Assessment of treatment efficacy and safety of antirheumatic therapy was performed for all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of sJIA in a rheumatological inpatient setting at 3 months after initiating therapy, at 6 months after initiating therapy, and every 6 months thereafter | C |
2 | A complete blood count (CBC) with differential was performed (including erythrocyte sedimentation rate determination, erythrocyte count, leukocyte count, platelet count, differential leukocyte count [leukocyte formula], and total hemoglobin level determination) | C |
3 | Infusions of genetically engineered biologic drugs and/or injections/administration of immunosuppressants were discontinued (for 7 days) when the platelet count dropped to ≤150 > 100 × 109/L or the neutrophil count dropped to <1.5 ≥ 1.0 × 109/L in the complete blood count | C |
4 | Immunosuppressants and/or genetically engineered biologic drugs were withdrawn when the absolute neutrophil count dropped to <1.0 × 109/L and/or the platelet count dropped to <100 × 109/L in the complete blood count | C |
5 | The colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** was prescribed at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously for leukopenia with an absolute neutrophil count of ≤1.0 × 109/L for 3–5 days (or longer if necessary) until complete normalization of leukocyte and neutrophil counts | C |
6 | The colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** at 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously was prescribed in combination with intravenous systemic antibacterial drugs for febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) with an absolute neutrophil count of ≤1.0 × 109/L | C |
7 | Continued systemic antibacterial treatment was performed in all patients with febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) | C |
8 | Resumed treatment with an immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD at the same dose after recovery of the neutrophil count to ≥1.5×109/L according to the complete blood count | C |
9 | Adjustment of immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy was performed in the presence of data on recurrent episodes of decreased blood cell counts in the complete blood count | C |
10 | Administration of fluconazole** intravenously at 3–12 mg/kg/day depending on the severity and duration of induced neutropenia performed for patients with neutropenia | C |
11 | Performed tests for total blood protein, blood albumin, total blood bilirubin, free and conjugated blood bilirubin, blood creatinine, blood urea, blood uric acid, blood glucose, blood ferritin, blood triglycerides, blood cholesterol, blood sodium, blood potassium, total blood calcium, blood lactate dehydrogenase activity, blood aspartate aminotransferase activity, blood alanine aminotransferase activity, blood gamma-glutamyl transferase activity, blood alkaline phosphatase activity, serum iron, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood creatine kinase activity, pancreatic amylase activity, and lipase activity | C |
12 | Temporary discontinuation of the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD was performed in case of an increase in serum ALT and/or AST levels $\ge 1.5$ times above the upper limit of normal and/or an increase in total bilirubin, free (unconjugated) and/or bound (conjugated) bilirubin, and/or urea, and/or creatinine, and/or uric acid, and/or other biochemical parameter(s) above the upper limit of normal | C |
13 | Resumption of therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD at the same dose was performed after normalization of general clinical blood chemistry parameters | C |
14 | Adjustment of therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD was performed in the presence of data on repeated episodes of elevation of biochemical parameter(s) | C |
15 | Performed determination of antibodies to cell nuclear antigens and DNA in the blood of all patients receiving TNF-alpha inhibitors | C |
16 | A study of the C-reactive protein level in blood serum was performed | C |
17 | A study of immunoglobulin levels in blood was performed | C |
18 | Prescribed #normal human immunoglobulin** at a dose of 400 mg/kg; if a sufficient blood immunoglobulin level is not achieved, at a dose of 500 mg/kg at least once every 2–4 weeks until blood immunoglobulin levels normalize in the event of hypogammaglobulinemia | C |
19 | Performed skipping of a scheduled infusion of #rituximab**, continuation of immunosuppressant therapy, and ongoing intake of previously prescribed oral glucocorticoids in the event of decreased blood immunoglobulin levels | C |
20 | Resumed infusions of #rituximab** after recovery of blood immunoglobulin levels | C |
21 | Blood procalcitonin level measurement was performed in all patients with fever | C |
22 | Performed a set of tests to rule out sepsis (comprehensive complete blood count, general clinical blood chemistry, serum C-reactive protein, blood culture for sterility, microbiological culture of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal swabs for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, automated urine culture for bacterial pathogens, microbiological culture of anal discharge with antimicrobial susceptibility testing, thromboelastography, coagulogram [screening hemostasis test]; chest computed tomography, comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, renal ultrasound, echocardiography, abdominal MRI, pelvic MRI, retroperitoneal MRI) | C |
23 | Prescribed empirical antibiotic therapy initially, followed subsequently—depending on the clinical situation—by intravenous systemic antibacterial drugs active against Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (combinations of penicillins, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins, and/or carbapenems, and/or other antibacterial agents, and/or glycopeptide antibiotics, and/or other aminoglycosides, and/or macrolides) with or without systemic antifungal agents based on microbial sensitivity, combined with #normal human immunoglobulin** at a dose of 400 mg/kg/course (5 days) upon the development of sepsis | C |
24 | Resumption of therapy with the immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD was performed no earlier than one week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of sepsis and completion of antibacterial therapy | C |
25 | Prothrombin index determination, soluble fibrin monomer complexes (SFMC) blood test, prothrombin (thromboplastin) time in blood or plasma, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), thrombin time in blood, protein C level blood test, protein S activity blood test, plasminogen level blood test, fibrinogen level blood test, D-dimer blood concentration determination, von Willebrand factor activity and properties blood test, antithrombin III activity blood test | C |
26 | Performed thromboelastography in patients with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS), sepsis, signs of hypercoagulation or hypocoagulation, and in patients receiving antithrombotic agents | C |
27 | Blood heparin level testing | C |
28 | Performed prescription/adjustment of therapy with antithrombotic agents: heparin group drugs or direct factor Xa inhibitors; antiplatelet agents other than heparin; antifibrinolytic agents in the event of coagulopathy or disseminated intravascular coagulation based on coagulogram (screening hemostasis test) and thromboelastogram data | C |
29 | Blood transfusion was performed in accordance with indications in patients with consumption coagulopathy/bleeding | C |
30 | Lymphocyte subset testing was performed in all patients receiving #rituximab**, as well as in patients with frequent viral and purulent bacterial infections, including opportunistic infections | C |
31 | Performed Epstein-Barr virus DNA detection by PCR in peripheral and cord blood (quantitative assay), Epstein-Barr virus DNA detection in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs by PCR (qualitative assay), and Epstein-Barr virus DNA detection in urine by PCR (qualitative assay) in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs with or without glucocorticoids, patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and patients with interstitial pneumonia | C |
32 | Performed Cytomegalovirus DNA detection by PCR in peripheral and cord blood (quantitative assay), Cytomegalovirus DNA detection in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs by PCR (qualitative assay), and Cytomegalovirus DNA detection in urine by PCR (qualitative assay) in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs with or without glucocorticoids, patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and patients with interstitial pneumonia | C |
33 | Performed Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA detection by PCR in blood (quantitative assay), Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA detection in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs by PCR (qualitative assay), and Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 DNA detection in urine by PCR (qualitative assay) in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs with or without glucocorticoids, patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and patients with interstitial pneumonia | C |
34 | Performed detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to Cytomegalovirus in blood in all patients with interstitial, focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes on chest computed tomography, in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs with or without glucocorticoids, in patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and in patients with interstitial pneumonia | C |
35 | Performed detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus in blood in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs with or without glucocorticoids, patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and patients with interstitial pneumonia | C |
36 | Performed detection of antibodies to the capsid antigen (VCA) of Epstein-Barr virus in blood in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs with or without glucocorticoids, patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and patients with interstitial pneumonia | C |
37 | Performed detection of IgG antibodies to early antigens (EA) of Epstein-Barr virus in blood in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs with or without glucocorticoids, patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and patients with interstitial pneumonia | C |
38 | Performed detection of antibodies to Herpes simplex virus in blood in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs with or without glucocorticoids, patients with clinical manifestations of herpetic infection, and patients with interstitial pneumonia | C |
39 | Prescribed #acyclovir** at a dose of 200 mg orally 5 times a day (maximum 1000 mg/day) in children older than 2 years, or at 5–10 mg/kg/dose intravenously every 8 hours in the event of localized herpetic infection; prescribed #acyclovir** at 10 mg/kg/dose intravenously every 8 hours in children aged <1 year, and at 500 mg/m2 intravenously every 8 hours in children aged ≥1 year in the event of Herpes zoster | C |
40 | Prescribed #ganciclovir** at a dose of 6 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14-21 days upon the development of cytomegalovirus infection or #ganciclovir** at a dose of 10 mg/kg/administration intravenously every 12 hours for 14-21 days upon the development of Epstein-Barr virus infection | C |
41 | Performed temporary discontinuation of immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs in all patients upon the development of herpesvirus infection | C |
42 | Resumption of therapy with immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs was performed in all patients no earlier than 1 week after the complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of infection and completion of antiviral therapy | C |
43 | Performed screening for the presence/absence of tuberculosis (tuberculin skin test, recombinant tuberculosis allergen test in standard dilution**, blood interferon-gamma release assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, chest computed tomography) in all patients receiving biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants with or without glucocorticoids at least twice a year | C |
44 | Discontinued immunosuppressant and/or biological therapy in all patients with a positive intradermal tuberculin test (papule >5 mm) and/or elevated interferon-gamma levels, and/or lung lesions, and/or intrathoracic lymph node involvement | C |
45 | Performed initial examination (consultation) by a phthisiatrician for patients with a positive focal tuberculin skin test and/or intradermal test with a tuberculosis allergen, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or lung and/or intrathoracic lymph node involvement | C |
46 | Prescribed oral GCs to all patients upon development of a systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) flare for the duration of specific anti-tuberculosis therapy | C |
47 | Resumption of therapy with immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs was performed in all patients after completing specific antituberculosis therapy and consulting a phthisiatrician | C |
48 | Performed determination of antibodies to Salmonella enterica in blood, determination of antibodies to Salmonella typhi in blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in blood, determination of antibodies to Yersinia enterocolitica serovars in blood | C |
49 | Determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella boydii in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella dysenteriae in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella sonnei in the blood, determination of classes M, G antibodies (IgM, IgG) to Shigella flexneri in the blood was performed | C |
50 | Administered etiotropic therapy upon detection of diagnostic titers of IgA and IgM, as well as high titers of IgG antibodies against Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, Yersinia enterocolitica serovars, Salmonella enterica, and Salmonella typhi in the blood | C |
51 | Determined blood IgA, IgM, and IgG antibodies to Chlamydia psittaci; determined blood antibodies to Chlamydia trachomatis; determined blood antibodies to Chlamydophila pneumoniae; determined blood IgM and IgG antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae | C |
52 | Administered etiotropic therapy upon detection of diagnostic titers of IgA and IgM, as well as high titers of IgG antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Chlamydia psittaci, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae in the blood | C |
53 | Microbiological (culture) examination of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal swabs for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms was performed | C |
54 | General (clinical) urinalysis, urinary albumin determination, and 24-hour urinary protein quantification have been performed | C |
55 | Nechyporenko urine test performed | C |
56 | Electrocardiogram recording performed | C |
57 | Holter ECG monitoring was performed in patients with arrhythmia or pathological electrocardiographic findings | C |
58 | Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was performed in patients with arterial hypertension | C |
59 | A comprehensive ultrasound examination of internal organs (including comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and renal ultrasound) was performed | C |
60 | Echocardiography performed | C |
61 | Performed esophagogastroduodenoscopy with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving NSAIDs and/or glucocorticoids, and in patients with dyspeptic symptoms | C |
62 | Microbiological (culture) examination of gastric mucosa biopsy specimens for Helicobacter pylori was performed in patients with inflammatory and/or erosive and/or ulcerative changes according to esophagogastroduodenoscopy findings | C |
63 | Prescription of medications for the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease has been made upon detection of reflux disease and/or inflammatory gastropathy, erosive and/or ulcerative processes in the esophagus and/or stomach and/or duodenum | C |
64 | Performed eradication therapy including proton pump inhibitors, systemic antibacterial drugs, and bismuth tripotassium dicitrate** at a dose of 8 mg/kg/day in 1–2 doses (for patients aged 4 to 8 years) for 4–8 weeks, at a dose of 120 mg twice daily (for patients aged 8 to 12 years), or at a dose of 120 mg 4 times daily or 240 mg twice daily (for patients over 12 years old) in cases of inflammatory gastropathy, and erosive and/or ulcerative lesions of the stomach and/or duodenum associated with Helicobacter pylori | C |
65 | Temporary discontinuation of immunosuppressants and/or biologic DMARDs was performed in all patients for the duration of eradication therapy | C |
66 | Performed magnetic resonance imaging of joints (single joint) with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) | C |
67 | Performed computed tomography of the chest organs with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) | C |
68 | Performed bronchoscopy with anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients with interstitial and/or focal, and/or infiltrative lung changes detected on chest computed tomography | C |
69 | Microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for Pneumocystis carinii cysts in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
70 | Performed quantitative PCR assay for Pneumocystis jirovecii DNA in sputum, endotracheal aspirate, or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
71 | Determined IgM and IgG antibodies to Pneumocystis jirovecii in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
72 | Microbiological (culture) examination of sputum for fungi (yeasts and molds) in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
73 | Performed microbiological (culture) examination of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for fungi (yeast and molds) in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
74 | Microbiological (cultural) examination of lavage fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms in patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography | C |
75 | Determination of antibodies to Aspergillus spp. in blood in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
76 | Determination of mannan and galactomannan in lavage fluid and blood was performed in all patients with signs of pneumonia according to chest computed tomography | C |
77 | Determination of Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
78 | Determination of Cytomegalovirus DNA in sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
79 | Determination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA (M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. bovis BCG) with species differentiation in sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, or bronchial washings by PCR in all patients with signs of pneumonia on chest computed tomography | C |
80 | Prescribed empiric antimicrobial therapy: #co-trimoxazole** in combination with systemic antibacterial drugs targeting Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins, and/or carbapenems, and/or other antibacterial drugs) combined with systemic antifungal drugs until the etiologic agent of interstitial pneumonia is identified, depending on the clinical situation | C |
81 | Intravenous GCs and #co-trimoxazole** at a dose of 3.75-5.0 mg/kg body weight/administration (15-20 mg/kg/day) (calculated as trimethoprim) intravenously every 8 hours for moderate Pneumocystis pneumonia, or at a dose of 3.75-5.0 mg/kg body weight/administration (15-20 mg/kg/day) (calculated as trimethoprim) intravenously every 6-8 hours for severe Pneumocystis pneumonia were prescribed | C |
82 | Prescribed #voriconazole** at a loading dose of 6 mg/kg intravenously every 12 hours for the first 24 hours, followed by 4 mg/kg starting on the second day, upon detection of galactomannan in lavage fluid and/or blood, and/or antibodies to Aspergillus spp. in the blood | C |
83 | Prescribed intravenous fluconazole** at a dose of 6-12 mg/kg/day upon detection of mannan in lavage fluid and/or blood | C |
84 | Prescribed systemic antibacterial drugs targeting Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic flora (penicillin combinations, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, and/or 4th-generation cephalosporins, and/or carbapenems, and/or other antibacterial drugs) combined with systemic antifungal drugs in the event of focal, lobar, or multilobar pneumonia | C |
85 | Temporary discontinuation of therapy with biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants was performed in all patients upon suspected/developed pneumonia | C |
86 | Resumed bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy in all patients no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of pneumonia confirmed by laboratory tests, follow-up chest computed tomography with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management), and completion of antibacterial therapy | C |
87 | Performed radiography of the temporomandibular joint and/or intervertebral articulations, and/or elbow joint, and/or wrist joint, and/or knee joint, and/or shoulder joint, and/or hip joint, and/or ankle joint, and/or acromioclavicular articulation, and/or sternoclavicular articulation, and/or hand, and/or foot in two projections, or joint computed tomography with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) in all patients with a history of active arthritis | C |
88 | Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with or without anesthesia (including early postoperative management) was performed in patients with a history of brain lesions | C |
89 | Performed X-ray densitometry in all patients receiving or previously receiving corticosteroids | C |
90 | Administered calcium and vitamin D supplements and their analogues to patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis | C |
91 | Prescribed #pamidronic acid, #alendronic acid**, #zoledronic acid**, or #ibandronic acid | C |
92 | Prescribed bisphosphonates in the following regimens: #pamidronic acid in patients <1 year old at 0.5 mg/kg IV every 2 months; in patients aged 1–2 years at 0.25–0.5 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 3 months; in patients aged 2–3 years at 0.375–0.75 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 3 months; in patients older than 3 years at 0.5–1 mg/kg/day IV for 3 days every 4 months (maximum dose 60 mg/administration); or #alendronic acid** at 1–2 mg/kg/week orally (for patients with body weight <40 kg at 5 mg/day or 35 mg/week; for patients with body weight >40 kg at 10 mg/day or 70 mg/week; maximum dose 70 mg/week); or #zoledronic acid** at 0.0125–0.05 mg/kg/administration IV every 6–12 months (maximum dose 4 mg) for the treatment of osteoporosis; or #ibandronic acid at 3 mg/administration IV once every 3 months or 150 mg orally once a month | C |
93 | Performed pre-exposure prophylaxis for novel coronavirus infection in patients aged 12 years and older with a body weight of at least 40 kg, prior to initiating or at any stage of therapy with immunosuppressants, bDMARDs, and/or GCs, using passive immunization with antiviral monoclonal antibody preparations | C |
94 | Administered pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (adsorbed)** containing capsular polysaccharides of 13 pneumococcal serotypes prior to initiating or at any stage of therapy with immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs, with or without GCs | C |
95 | Performed initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by an otorhinolaryngologist | C |
96 | Performed initial dental examination (consultation) by a pediatric dentist in all patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs combined with (or without) GCs | C |
97 | Performed initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by an ophthalmologist with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy | C |
98 | Initial pediatric cardiology examination (consultation, assessment) performed for patients with cardiac dysfunction and/or arterial hypertension | C |
99 | Performed initial examination (consultation) by a phthisiatrician in all patients with a positive focal tuberculin skin test and/or intradermal test with a tuberculosis allergen, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or focal or infiltrative lung changes | C |
100 | Initial pediatric endocrinology examination (consultation, assessment) performed for patients with endocrine pathology, including those receiving GCs | C |
101 | Initial clinical nutrition consultation (examination, assessment) performed for patients with underweight, amyotrophy, osteopenia/osteoporosis, constitutional obesity, Cushing's syndrome, and steroid diabetes | C |
102 | Performed initial examination (consultation) by a pediatric trauma surgeon/orthopedist in all patients with functional joint impairment, bone growth disorders, subluxations, or back pain | C |
103 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a neurologist was performed in patients with neurological symptoms, psychomotor developmental delay, and psychotic reactions | C |
104 | Follow-up neurology consultation (examination, assessment) performed for patients with neurological symptoms, psychomotor retardation, or psychotic reactions to evaluate treatment efficacy | C |
105 | Initial medical psychology consultation (testing, assessment) performed for all patients aged 1 year and older and their parents | A |
106 | Performed initial examination (consultation) by a physical therapist in all patients with functional impairment | C |
107 | Follow-up physiotherapy consultation (examination, assessment) performed for patients after a course of physiotherapeutic procedures | C |
108 | Performed initial examination (consultation) by a sports medicine / exercise therapy physician in all patients with functional impairment | C |
109 | Performed medical rehabilitation in all patients with functional impairment | C |
110 | Follow-up physical therapy consultation (examination, assessment) performed for all patients with functional impairment upon completion of the rehabilitation program | C |
111 | Performed adjustment of anti-rheumatic therapy in the inpatient rheumatology department that initiated bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant treatment, if the inactive disease state is not achieved by 6 months, remission by 12 months, and subsequently every 6 months | C |
112 | Anti-rheumatic therapy was adjusted in the inpatient rheumatology department that initiated biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and/or immunosuppressants at any stage of treatment upon the development of adverse events associated with bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy | C |
113 | Onco-vigilance maintained due to the potential development of oncological, onco-hematological, or lymphoproliferative disorders secondary to bDMARD therapy at any stage of treatment | C |
114 | Immediate discontinuation of the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD and hospitalization of the patient upon suspicion of an oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative disease | C |
115 | Obtained a bone marrow cytological specimen via puncture with anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) and a bone marrow histological specimen with cytological examination of bone marrow smear (myelogram), alongside pathomorphological examination of bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course | C |
116 | Lymph node biopsy (peripheral, or intra-abdominal/intrathoracic as clinically indicated) with anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), cytological examination of the lymph node tissue preparation, and pathological examination of the lymph node biopsy (surgical) material was performed in patients with marked enlargement of peripheral and/or intrathoracic, and/or intra-abdominal lymph nodes receiving immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs with an atypical disease course | C |
117 | Performed intravenous bolus contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course | C |
118 | Performed contrast-enhanced brain MRI, intravenous contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI, intravenous contrast-enhanced retroperitoneal MRI, and intravenous contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course | C |
119 | Performed intravenous contrast-enhanced bone MRI (one region) and joint MRI (one joint) with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD with an atypical disease course | C |
120 | Computed tomography of the bone and computed tomography of the joint, with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), was performed in patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs who have bone destruction lesions atypical for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) | C |
121 | Performed positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals (diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals), with contrast enhancement if necessary; whole-body positron emission tomography with tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) in patients receiving an immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD who present with severe arthralgia, myalgia, ossalgia, bone destruction, subcutaneous fat infiltrates, or lesions in parenchymal organs, the brain, or spinal cord | C |
122 | Multiposition bone scintigraphy, with or without anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), was performed in patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs who have bone destruction lesions atypical for sJIA | C |
123 | CT-guided core needle biopsy of the pelvic bones with anesthesia support (including early postoperative management), pathological examination of the bone marrow biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods, cytological examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints, immunocytochemical examination of bone marrow trephine biopsy imprints, and immunophenotyping of hematopoietic progenitor cells in the bone marrow was performed in patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs with an atypical disease course | C |
124 | Bone biopsy with anesthesia support (including early postoperative management) and pathological examination of the bone tissue biopsy (surgical) material was performed in patients receiving immunosuppressants and/or bDMARDs who have bone destruction lesions atypical for sJIA | C |
125 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a pediatric oncologist for patients with suspected/confirmed oncological/onco-hematological/lymphoproliferative disease or metastatic lesion based on examination results | C |
Table 7. Criteria for evaluating the quality of follow-up control for patients with systemic juvenile arthritis, including therapy safety monitoring, in outpatient settings
№ | Quality criteria | Level of Evidence |
|---|---|---|
1 | Follow-up care for patients with sJIA was performed: initial rheumatologist consultation (examination) with assessment of therapy efficacy and safety at least once a year after therapy initiation/adjustment and after achieving disease remission | C |
2 | Follow-up care for patients with sJIA was performed: follow-up rheumatologist consultation (examination) with assessment of therapy efficacy and safety at least once a month after therapy initiation/adjustment and at least once every 3 months after achieving disease remission | C |
3 | Immediate discontinuation of the bDMARD infusion/injection and/or immunosuppressant injection/administration was performed in the event of an allergic reaction | C |
4 | Prescription of systemic antihistamines and/or GCs performed upon the development of an allergic reaction to the administration of bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants | C |
5 | Consultation (examination, including remote) by a rheumatologist from the inpatient facility that initiated therapy performed for all patients upon the development of an allergic reaction to the intake and/or administration of bDMARDs and/or immunosuppressants | C |
6 | Emergency hospitalization was performed in the event of an allergic reaction to the administration and/or infusion of a bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant | C |
7 | Complete blood count (CBC) with differential (erythrocyte sedimentation rate determination, red blood cell count, leukocyte count, platelet count, differential leukocyte count), and total hemoglobin level determination was performed at least once every 2–4 weeks | C |
8 | Discontinuation of the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD, with continuation of previously prescribed oral GCs, was performed when platelet count decreased to ≤150>100×109/L and neutrophil count to <1.5≥1.0×109/L according to the complete blood count (CBC) | C |
9 | Administration of the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously was performed when leukocyte count decreased with an absolute neutrophil count of <1.0×109/L for 3–5 days (or longer if necessary) | C |
10 | Administration of the colony-stimulating factor #filgrastim** at a dose of 5–10 mcg/kg/day subcutaneously, urgent hospitalization to the local inpatient facility, and intravenous administration of systemic antibacterial drugs were performed in the event of febrile neutropenia (neutropenia accompanied by fever) with an absolute neutrophil count of <1.0×109/L | C |
11 | Continuation of immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy at the previous dose performed after normalization of complete blood count parameters and an increase in blood neutrophils to ≥1.5 × 109/L | C |
12 | Administration of fluconazole** 3–12 mg/kg/day orally, depending on the severity and duration of induced neutropenia, was performed in patients with neutropenia | C |
13 | Consultation (examination, including remote) by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated therapy was performed upon a recurrent episode of decreased neutrophil count, development of febrile neutropenia, and/or decreased blood platelet count according to the complete blood count (CBC) | C |
14 | Determination of total blood protein, blood albumin, total blood bilirubin, free and conjugated blood bilirubin, blood creatinine, blood urea, blood uric acid, blood glucose, blood ferritin, blood triglycerides, blood cholesterol, blood sodium, blood potassium, total blood calcium, blood lactate dehydrogenase activity, aspartate aminotransferase activity, alanine aminotransferase activity, gamma-glutamyltransferase activity, alkaline phosphatase activity, and serum iron was performed at least once every 2–4 weeks | C |
15 | Temporary discontinuation of immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy, with continuation of previously prescribed oral GCs, performed when ALT and AST activity in the blood exceeds the upper limit of normal by ≥ 1.5 times and/or other biochemical parameters exceed the upper limit of normal | C |
16 | Continuation of immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy at the same dose performed after normalization of the biochemical parameter(s) | C |
17 | Consultation (examination, including remote) by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated therapy was performed when data indicated repeated elevations of blood biochemical parameter(s) | C |
18 | Determination of autoantibodies to cell nuclei and DNA antigens in the blood was performed in patients receiving TNF-alpha inhibitors at least once every 3 months | C |
19 | Serum C-reactive protein level test was performed at least once every 3 months | C |
20 | Assessment of blood immunoglobulin levels performed at least once every 3 months | C |
21 | Temporary discontinuation of bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy, with continuation of previously prescribed oral GCs, was performed upon a decrease in blood immunoglobulin levels | C |
22 | Consultation (examination, including remote) by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated therapy was performed upon a decrease in blood immunoglobulin levels | C |
23 | Hospitalization was performed for patients with decreased blood immunoglobulin levels | C |
24 | Determination of antistreptolysin-O in blood serum was performed at least once every 3 months | C |
25 | Temporary discontinuation of immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD therapy, with continuation of previously prescribed oral GCs, performed upon the appearance of signs of an infectious complication | C |
26 | Consultation (examination, including remote) by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated therapy was performed upon the appearance of signs of infectious complications | C |
27 | Emergency hospitalization of the patient to an inpatient facility performed upon suspected/developed pneumonia | C |
28 | Temporary discontinuation of bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy, with continuation of previously prescribed oral GCs, was performed upon suspicion/development of pneumonia | C |
29 | Consultation (examination, including remote) by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated therapy was performed upon suspicion/development of pneumonia | C |
30 | Administration of #acyclovir** at a dose of 200 mg orally 5 times a day was performed in children older than 2 years (maximum 1000 mg/day) upon the development of local herpesvirus infection | C |
31 | Temporary discontinuation of biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants performed in case of herpes virus infection | C |
32 | Inpatient hospitalization was performed upon generalization of herpetic infection / suspected cytomegalovirus or Epstein-Barr virus infection | C |
33 | Resumption of immunosuppressant and/or biologic DMARD therapy performed for all patients no earlier than 1 week after complete resolution of clinical and laboratory signs of infection and completion of antiviral therapy | C |
34 | No vaccination with live or live-attenuated vaccines was performed in patients receiving bDMARDs | C |
35 | Vaccination of children was performed exclusively during disease remission, provided it is maintained for at least 6 months, according to an individual schedule, excluding live vaccines | C |
36 | Monitoring of the efficacy of biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants performed | C |
37 | Monitoring of the tolerability of biologic DMARDs and/or immunosuppressants performed | C |
38 | Consultation (examination, including remote) by the inpatient rheumatologist who initiated therapy was performed for all patients upon the development of any signs of intolerance to the immunosuppressant and/or bDMARD | C |
39 | Focal tuberculin skin testing (Mantoux test, or test with recombinant tuberculosis allergen in standard dilution**) was performed at least once every 6 months (more frequently if clinically indicated) | C |
40 | Complete urinalysis was performed at least once a month | C |
41 | Electrocardiography was performed at least once every 3 months | C |
42 | Performed abdominal ultrasound (comprehensive), echocardiography, and kidney ultrasound at least once every 6 months. | C |
43 | Initial otorhinolaryngologist consultation (examination) was performed for patients with ENT pathology no later than 7 days after hospital discharge | C |
44 | Performed a follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) with an–otorhinolaryngologist for patients requiring the sanitation of chronic infection foci and treatment of acute ENT infections. | C |
45 | Dispensary appointment (examination, consultation) by an otorhinolaryngologist performed at least once every 3 months as part of dispensary observation to monitor the condition of ENT organs– | C |
46 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a pediatric cardiologist performed no later than 7 days after discharge from the hospital for patients with cardiac impairment and/or arterial hypertension– | C |
47 | Dispensary appointment (examination, consultation) by a pediatric cardiologist performed at least once every 3 months for patients with cardiac impairment and/–or arterial hypertension | C |
48 | Initial admission (examination, consultation) by a pediatric dentist– performed within 1 month after discharge from the hospital | C |
49 | Dispensing appointment (examination, consultation) by a pediatric dentist performed for all patients at least once every 3 months as part of follow-up care– | C |
50 | Initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by an ophthalmologist with mandatory eye biomicroscopy performed no later than 7 days after hospital discharge for patients with ophthalmological pathology | C |
51 | Follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) by an ophthalmologist with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy performed for all patients with ophthalmological pathology based on individual indications– | C |
52 | Dispensing appointment (examination, consultation) by an ophthalmologist with mandatory ocular biomicroscopy performed at least once every 3 months– | C |
53 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a dietitian performed within 2 weeks after discharge from the inpatient facility for patients with underweight, amyotrophy, osteopenia/osteoporosis, constitutional obesity, Cushing's syndrome, and steroid diabetes– | C |
54 | Follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) by a dietitian performed for patients with underweight, amyotrophy, osteopenia/osteoporosis, constitutional obesity, Cushing's syndrome, and steroid diabetes based on individual indications– | C |
55 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a phthisiatrician performed for patients with a positive focal tuberculin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculosis allergen, and/or elevated blood levels of interferon-gamma in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or focal or infiltrative changes in the lungs to determine the feasibility of chemoprophylaxis or anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy– | C |
56 | Examination (evaluation, consultation, including telemedical) by a hospital rheumatologist who initiated therapy, performed for patients with a positive intradermal tuberculin test | C |
57 | Performed follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) by a phthisiologist–for patients with a positive focal tuberculin skin test and/or intradermal test with tuberculosis allergen, and/or elevated blood interferon-gamma levels to Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex antigens, and/or focal or infiltrative changes in the lungs | C |
58 | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a pediatric endocrinologist completed – no later than 7 days after hospital discharge for all patients receiving GCs and patients with steroid-induced diabetes | C |
59 | Dispanserization appointment (examination, consultation) by a pediatric endocrinologist completed – at least once every 3 months for patients receiving GCs and patients with steroid-induced diabetes | C |
60 | Performed initial follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) by an orthopedic traumatologist––no later than 7 days after hospital discharge for patients with joint functional insufficiency, impaired longitudinal bone growth, subluxations, and back pain | C |
61 | Performed routine follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) by an orthopedic traumatologist––at least once every 3 months as part of routine follow-up care | C |
62 | Initial examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist performed no later than 7 days after hospital discharge | C |
63 | Follow-up examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist performed after completion of the psychological rehabilitation program | C |
64 | Routine follow-up examination (testing, consultation) by a medical psychologist performed at least once every 3 months as part of follow-up care | C |
65 | Initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a physical therapist performed within 2 weeks after hospital discharge for patients with joint function impairment | C |
66 | Examination (evaluation, consultation) by a physical therapy physician performed within 2 weeks after hospital discharge | C |
67 | Performed medical rehabilitation in all patients with functional impairment | C |
68 | Performed follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) by a physical therapy physician– | C |
69 | Follow-up examination (evaluation, consultation) by a physical therapy physician performed based on individual indications | C |
70 | Routine follow-up examination (evaluation, consultation) by a physical therapy physician performed at least once every 3 months as part of regular health checks | C |
71 | Unscheduled hospitalization, based on indications, to the rheumatology department of the hospital that initiated biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD)/immunosuppressant therapy at any stage of treatment in the event of exacerbation/complications of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, comorbid conditions, or complications/side effects/persistent intolerance to bDMARDs/immunosuppressants | C |
72 | Scheduled hospitalization to the rheumatology department of the hospital that initiated bDMARD and/or immunosuppressant therapy for all patients 3 and 6 months after therapy initiation, and every 6 months thereafter | C |
References
Show references
Petty RE, Laxer RM, Lindsley CB, et al. Textbook of pediatric rheumatology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Inc 2020.
Petty RE, Southwood TR, Manners P, et al. International League of Associations for Rheumatology classification of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: second revision, Edmonton, 2001. J Rheumatol. 2004;31:390–2.
Baranov AA, Alekseeva EI, editors. Rheumatic diseases in children. Moscow: Pediatrs 2016.
Cimaz R. Systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15:931–4. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2016.07.004
Janow G, Schanberg LE, Setoguchi S, et al. The Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Cohort of the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Registry: 2010-2013. J Rheumatol. 2016;43:1755–62. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.150997
Onel KB, Horton DB, Lovell DJ, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Oligoarthritis, Temporomandibular Joint Arthritis, and Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74:553–69. doi: 10.1002/art.42037
Baranov AA, Alekseeva EI, Bzarova TM, et al. Protocol for the management of patients with juvenile arthritis. Current Pediatrics. 2013;12:37–56.
Alexeeva EI. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: clinical picture, diagnosis, treatment. Curr Pediatr. 2015;14:78–94. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v14i1.1266
John RM, Kenney-Riley K. Care of the Child with a Possible Rheumatological Disorder. In: John RM, ed. Pediatric Diagnostic Labs for Primary Care: An Evidence-based Approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2022:461–86.
Martini A. Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2012;12:56–9. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.07.022
Ghosh JB. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis-Its Rare Presentation. Indian J Pediatr. 2012;79:262–4. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0484-z
Mondal R, Sarkar S, Ghoshal A, et al. Congestive Heart Failure: An Uncommon Presentation of Systemic Onset Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (SOJIA). Indian J Pediatr. 2013;80:67–9. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0636-1
Belozerov KE, Isupova EA, Solomatina NM, et al. Initial Respiratory System Involvement in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis with Systemic Onset Is a Marker of Interstitial Lung Disease: The Results of Retrospective Cohort Study Analysis. J Clin Med. 2024;13:3843. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133843
Marzan KAB, Shaham B. Early Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2012;38:355–72. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2012.04.006
Kim YD, Job AV, Cho W. Differential Diagnosis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Rheum Dis. 2017;24:131. doi: 10.4078/jrd.2017.24.3.131
Onel KB, Horton DB, Lovell DJ, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Recommendations for Nonpharmacologic Therapies, Medication Monitoring, Immunizations, and Imaging. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74:570–85. doi: 10.1002/art.42036
Tepaev RF. Disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome in children. Diagnosis and treatment. Pediatric Pharmacology. 2010;7:27–31.
De Vere-Tyndall A, Macauley D, Ansell BM. Disseminated intravascular coagulation complicating systemic juvenile chronic arthritis (“Still’s disease”). Clin Rheumatol. 1983;2:415–8. doi: 10.1007/BF02041564
Oren H, Cingöz I, Duman M, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in pediatric patients: clinical and laboratory features and prognostic factors influencing the survival. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005;22:679–88. doi: 10.1080/08880010500278749
Rajagopal R, Thachil J, Monagle P. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in paediatrics. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:187–93. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311053
Scott JP, Gerber P, Maryjowski MC, et al. Evidence for intravascular coagulation in systemic onset, but not polyarticular, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1985;28:256–61. doi: 10.1002/art.1780280304
Schapkaitz E, Sherman GG, Jacobson BF, et al. Paediatric anticoagulation guidelines. S Afr Med J. 2012;102:171. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.5471
Manco-Johnson MJ. How I treat venous thrombosis in children. Blood. 2006;107:21–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-11-4211
Tolbert J, Carpenter SL. Common Acquired Causes of Thrombosis in Children. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013;43:169–77. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2013.05.005
Hemorrhagic and thrombotic diseases and syndromes in children and adolescents: pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, therapy and prophylaxis: monograph / B.I. Kuznik, V.G. Sturov, N.Yu. Levshin [et al.]. – 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. – Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2018. – 524 p.
Ameri A, Anderson CM, Smith JH, et al. Thromboembolic Complications in a Pediatric Patient Population: Treatment with Direct Oral Anticoagulants. Monitoring of Treatment Efficiency with D-Dimer Levels and Safety Profile By Thromboelastogram. Blood. 2021;138:4270–4270. doi: 10.1182/blood-2021-146948
Sepúlveda M P, Salgado U A, Barriga G J, et al. Usefulness of the thromboelastogram in children: correlation with habitual coagulation tests. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2019;90:617–23. doi: 10.32641/rchped.v90i6.930
Verma A, Hemlata. Thromboelastography as a novel viscoelastic method for hemostasis monitoring: Its methodology, applications, and constraints. Glob J Transfus Med. 2017;2:8. doi: 10.4103/GJTM.GJTM_4_17
Yuan W-H, Liu H-C, Zeng L-K, et al. [Change of Thrombelastography in Children’s DIC and Analysis of Its Sensitivity and Specificity for Diagnosis of DIC]. Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2017;25:847–52. doi:10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2017.03.039.
Golub I. E., Sorokina L. V. Selected issues in general anesthesiology (guidelines for clinical residents, reprint rights authorized). – 2005.
Mikhelson, V. A., V. A. Sidorov, and S. M. Stepanenko. “Anesthesia and Intensive Care in Pediatrics.” M.: «Del rus» (2007).
Nik A, Mirfeizi Z, Rezaieyazdi Z, et al. ABO and Rh blood groups in patients with Lupus and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Casp J Intern Med. 2021;12. doi: 10.22088/cjim.12.4.568
Salem GI, Gamal NM, Talaat EA, et al. Clinical Impact of the ABO Blood Type in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Is there a Link to the ABO and Rhesus? Mediterr J Rheumatol. 2021;32:237. doi: 10.31138/mjr.32.3.237
Breda, L., Nozzi, M., De Sanctis, S., & Chiarelli, F. (2010). Laboratory Tests in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases: An Update. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 40(1), 53–72. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.12.
Shenoi S, Wallace CA. Diagnosis and Treatment of Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Pediatr. 2016;177:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.06.056
Cortis E, Insalaco A. Macrophage activation syndrome in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:38–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.tb02414.x
Ahn JG. Role of Biomarkers in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Rheum Dis. 2020;27:233–40. doi: 10.4078/jrd.2020.27.4.233
Ben-Chetrit E, Gattorno M, Gul A, et al. Consensus proposal for taxonomy and definition of the autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs): a Delphi study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1558–65. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212515
Hashkes PJ, Laxer RM, Simon A, editors. Textbook of Autoinflammation. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2019.
Limper M, de Kruif MD, Duits AJ, et al. The diagnostic role of Procalcitonin and other biomarkers in discriminating infectious from non-infectious fever. J Infect. 2010;60:409–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2010.03.016
Shcherbina AYu. Primary immunodeficiencies: realities of the 21st century. Issues of Hematology, Oncology and Immunopathology in Pediatrics. 2016;15:8-9–9. https://www.hemoncim.com/jour/article/view/142 (accessed 14 April 2020)
Quesada-Masachs E, Άlvarez De La Sierra D, Garcia Prat M, et al. AB0165 In Depth Immunophenotypic Analysis In Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA): A Crossectional Study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:952.3-953. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.4823
Aksenova VA, Baryshnikov LA, Klevno NI, et al. New opportunities for screening and diagnosis of various manifestations of tuberculosis infection in children and adolescents in Russia. Issues of Modern Pediatrics. 2011;10:16–22. https://vsp.spr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/638 (accessed 14 April 2020)
Aksenova VA, Klevno NI, Kazakov AV, et al. Preventive Tuberculosis Services Reduces the Risk of Local Forms of Tuberculosis Development in Children on Immunosuppressive Therapy: Retrospective Cohort Study. Curr Pediatr. 2020;19:346–51. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v19i5.2210
Calzada-Hernández J, Anton J, Martín De Carpi J, et al. Dual latent tuberculosis screening with tuberculin skin tests and QuantiFERON-TB assays before TNF-α inhibitor initiation in children in Spain. Eur J Pediatr. 2022;182:307–17. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04640-3
Barmina NA, Baryshnikova LA, Shurygin AA, et al. Screening examination of children and adolescents of health groups III, IV and V using a new diagnostic test. Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases. 2015;0:40–1.
Soon GS, Laxer RM. Approach to recurrent fever in childhood. Can Fam Physician Med Fam Can. 2017;63:756–62.
Selmi C, Gershwin ME. Diagnosis and classification of reactive arthritis. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13:546–9. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2014.01.005
Zeidler H, Hudson AP. Reactive Arthritis Update: Spotlight on New and Rare Infectious Agents Implicated as Pathogens. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2021;23:53. doi: 10.1007/s11926-021-01018-6
Dembek ZF, Mothershead JL, Owens AN, et al. Psittacosis: An Underappreciated and Often Undiagnosed Disease. Pathogens. 2023;12:1165. doi: 10.3390/pathogens12091165
Singh A, Karrar S. The Role of Intracellular Organisms in the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Arthritis. Int J Inflamm. 2014;2014:1–8. doi: 10.1155/2014/158793
Bentaleb I, Abdelghani KB, Rostom S, et al. Reactive Arthritis: Update. Curr Clin Microbiol Rep. 2020;7:124–32. doi: 10.1007/s40588-020-00152-6
Yang W-C, Huang Y-C, Tsai M-H, et al. Salmonella Septic Arthritis Involving Multiple Joints in a Girl with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia at Diagnosis. Pediatr Neonatol. 2009;50:33–5. doi: 10.1016/S1875-9572(09)60027-9
Kanakoudi-Tsakalidou, G Pardalos, P F. Persistent or Severe Course of Reactive Arthritis Following Salmonella enteritidis Infection: A prospective study of 9 cases. Scand J Rheumatol. 1998;27:431–4. doi: 10.1080/030097498442253
Kurniawan A, Sitorus IP, Loho T, et al. A rare case of septic arthritis of the knee caused by Salmonella typhi with preexisting typhoid fever in a healthy, immunocompetent child – A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021;78:76–80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.12.003
Leino R, Mäkelä A-L, Tiilikainen A, et al. Yersinia Arthritis in Children. Scand J Rheumatol. 1980;9:245–9. doi: 10.3109/03009748009112357
Hannu T. Reactive arthritis after an outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis serotype O:3 infection. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:866–9. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.9.866
Jezequel C, Prigent JY, Loiseau-Corvez MN, et al. [Reactive arthritis caused by Yersinia in children. Report of 4 cases]. Ann Pediatr (Paris). 1991;38:318–22.
Naija O. et al. A new case of reactive arthritis following Yersinia pseudotuberculosis serotype IV // Journal of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. – 2010. – Vol. 5. – No. 02. – P. 193-194.
Taccetti G, Trapani S, Ermini M, et al. Reactive arthritis triggered by Yersinia enterocolitica: a review of 18 pediatric cases. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1994;12:681–4.
Williams G. F. et al. Post-Yersinia Arthritis // Western Journal of Medicine. – 1980. – Vol. 132. – No. 6. – P. 535.
Hannu T. Reactive arthritis attributable to Shigella infection: a clinical and epidemiological nationwide study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:594–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2004.027524
Mazumder RN, Salam MA, Ali M, et al. Reactive arthritis associated with Shigella dysenteriae type 1 infection. J Diarrhoeal Dis Res. 1997;15:21–4.
Plesca DA, Luminos M, Spatariu L, et al. Postinfectious arthritis in pediatric practice. Maedica. 2013;8:164–9.
Sood SK. Lyme Disease in Children. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015;29:281–94. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2015.02.011
Orczyk K, Świdrowska-Jaros J, Smolewska E. When a patient suspected with juvenile idiopathic arthritis turns out to be diagnosed with an infectious disease – a review of Lyme arthritis in children. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2017;15:35. doi: 10.1186/s12969-017-0166-0
Steffen, Hirsch. Diagnostik der Lyme-Borreliose. Ther Umsch. 2005;62:737–44. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930.62.11.737
Shi T, Huang L, Tian J. Prevalence of Epstein-Barr Viral DNA among children at a single hospital in Suzhou, China. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2022;98:142–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.05.006
Houen G, Trier NH. Epstein-Barr Virus and Systemic Autoimmune Diseases. Front Immunol. 2021;11:587380. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.587380
Engelmann I, Petzold DR, Kosinska A, et al. Rapid quantitative PCR assays for the simultaneous detection of herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and human herpesvirus 6 DNA in blood and other clinical specimens. J Med Virol. 2008;80:467–77. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21095
Bzarova T., Alekseeva E., Akulova S. A case of Epstein-Barr virus infection mimicking the systemic variant of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Issues of Modern Pediatrics. 2007;6(3):101-106.
Kharitonova LA, Soboleva NG. The role of the infectious factor in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis in children. Ross Vestn Perinatol Pediatr Russ Bull Perinatol Pediatr. 2018;63:59–63. doi: 10.21508/1027-4065-2018-63-3-59-63
Soldatova E. Yu. et al. Prevalence of herpesvirus infection in patients with various forms and variants of juvenile arthritis // Lechaschy Vrach. – 2017. – No. 6. – P. 31-31.
Banko A, Cirkovic A, Jeremic I, et al. Uncovering the Role of Epstein–Barr Virus Infection Markers for Remission in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Biomedicines. 2023;11:2375. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11092375
for the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO), Giancane G, Swart JF, et al. Opportunistic infections in immunosuppressed patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: analysis by the Pharmachild Safety Adjudication Committee. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22:71. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02167-2
Petty RE, Laxer RM, Lindsley CB, et al. Textbook of pediatric rheumatology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Inc 2020.
Liu Z, Zhang P, Tang S, et al. Urine real-time polymerase chain reaction detection for children virus pneumonia with acute human cytomegalovirus infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:245. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-245
A. Ross S, Novak Z, Pati S, et al. Overview of the Diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus Infection. Infect Disord - Drug Targets. 2011;11:466–74. doi: 10.2174/187152611797636703
Slots J, Slots H. Bacterial and viral pathogens in saliva: disease relationship and infectious risk. Periodontol 2000. 2011;55:48–69. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00361.x
Strick LB, Wald A. Diagnostics for Herpes Simplex Virus: Is PCR the New Gold Standard? Mol Diagn Ther. 2006;10:17–28. doi: 10.1007/BF03256439
Vince A, Dusek D. Imunosupresija i virusne infekcije u reumatskim bolestima [Immunosupression and viral infections in rheumatic diseases]. Reumatizam. 2007;54(2):58-62. Croatian. PMID: 18351141.
Eisenstein EM, Wolf DG. Cytomegalovirus infection in pediatric rheumatic diseases: a review. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2010;8:17. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-8-17
Hanson V, Kornreich HK, Drexler E, et al. Some Immunologic Considerations in Focal Scleroderma and Progressive Systemic Sclerosis in Children. Pediatr Res. 1974;8:806–9. doi: 10.1203/00006450-197409000-00006
Looker KJ, Magaret AS, May MT, et al. Global and Regional Estimates of Prevalent and Incident Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infections in 2012. PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0140765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140765
McQuillan G, Kruszon-Moran D, Flagg EW, et al. Prevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Type 2 in Persons Aged 14-49: United States, 2015-2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2018;1–8.
Xu F, Lee FK, Morrow RA, et al. Seroprevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 in Children in the United States. J Pediatr. 2007;151:374–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.065
Levin MJ, Weinberg A, Schmid DS. Herpes Simplex Virus and Varicella-Zoster Virus. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4:4.3.49. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.DMIH2-0017-2015
McAuley JB. Toxoplasmosis in Children: Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:161–2. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181658abb
Villard O, Cimon B, L’Ollivier C, et al. Serological diagnosis of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;84:22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.09.009
Dong W, Zhong Q, Gu Y-L, et al. Is Toxoplasma gondii infection a concern in individuals with rheumatic diseases? Evidence from a case-control study based on serological diagnosis. Microb Pathog. 2023;182:106257. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106257
Cascio A., Colomba C. Childhood Mediterranean visceral leishmaniasis // Le Infezioni in Medicina. – 2003. – Vol. 11. – No. 1. – P. 5-10.
Moltó A, Mateo L, Lloveras N, et al. Visceral leishmaniasis and macrophagic activation syndrome in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis under treatment with adalimumab. Joint Bone Spine. 2010;77:271–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2010.01.011
Kurizky PS, Marianelli FF, Cesetti MV, et al. A comprehensive systematic review of leishmaniasis in patients undergoing drug-induced immunosuppression for the treatment of dermatological, rheumatological and gastroenterological diseases. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 2020;62:e28. doi: 10.1590/s1678-9946202062028
Indolfi G, Easterbrook P, Dusheiko G, et al. Hepatitis B virus infection in children and adolescents. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;4:466–76. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30042-1
Mack CL, Adams D, Assis DN, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Autoimmune Hepatitis in Adults and Children: 2019 Practice Guidance and Guidelines From the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2020;72:671–722. doi: 10.1002/hep.31065
Lampertico P, Agarwal K, Berg T, et al. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2017;67:370–98. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.021
Reust CE. Evaluation of primary immunodeficiency disease in children. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87:773–8.
Key recommendations. WHO Recommendations on the Diagnosis of HIV Infection in Infants and Children. World Health Organization 2010.
Robinson JL, Lee BE, Kothapalli S, et al. Use of Throat Swab or Saliva Specimens for Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Children. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:e61–4. doi: 10.1086/529386
Hurd A, Beukelman T. Infectious Complications in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2013;15:327. doi: 10.1007/s11926-013-0327-1
Chien Y-L, Huang F-L, Huang C-M, et al. Clinical approach to fever of unknown origin in children. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017;50:893–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.08.007
Ahmadinejad Z, Mansori S, Ziaee V, et al. Periodic Fever: a review on clinical, management and guideline for Iranian patients - part I. Iran J Pediatr 2014;24:1–13.
Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:10–67. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05878-6
Howell MD, Davis AM. Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock. 2017;2.
Ören H, Cingöz I, Duman M, et al. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in pediatric patients: Clinical and Laboratory Features and Prognostic Factors Influencing the Survival. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2005;22:679–88. doi: 10.1080/08880010500278749
Foster BJ, Duffy CM, Sharma AK. Systemic juvenile rheumatoid arthritis complicated by two different renal lesions. Pediatr Nephrol. 1998;12:113–6. doi: 10.1007/s004670050416
Del Giudice E, Marcellino A, Hoxha S, et al. Proteinuria and hematuria as early signs of renal involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1395961. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1395961
Ruemmele FM, Veres G, Kolho KL, et al. Consensus guidelines of ECCO/ESPGHAN on the medical management of pediatric Crohn’s disease. J Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:1179–207. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2014.04.005
Turner D, Ruemmele FM, Orlanski-Meyer E, et al. Management of Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis, Part 1: Ambulatory Care—An Evidence-based Guideline From European Crohn’s and Colitis Organization and European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;67:257–91. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002035
Ferrara G, Pastore S, Sancin L, et al. Fecal Calprotectin to Detect Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2018;45:1418–21. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.171200
Koca B, Sahin S, Adrovic A, et al. Cardiac involvement in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2017;37:137–42. doi: 10.1007/s00296-016-3534-z
Binstadt BA, Levine JC, Nigrovic PA, et al. Coronary Artery Dilation Among Patients Presenting With Systemic-Onset Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Pediatrics. 2005;116:e89–93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2190
Boylan M. Should ultrasound be used routinely in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis? Ir J Med Sci 1971 -. 2020;189:735–48. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02096-3
Okamoto N, Yokota S, Takei S, et al. Clinical practice guidance for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) 2018. Mod Rheumatol. 2019;29:41–59. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1514724
Basra HAS, Humphries PD. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis: what is the utility of ultrasound? Br J Radiol. 2017;90:20160920. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160920
Chauvin NA, Doria AS. Ultrasound imaging of synovial inflammation in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47:1160–70. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-3934-6
Malattia C, Rinaldi M, Martini A. The role of imaging in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2018;14:681–94. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2018.1496019
Balassy C, Miller SF. CT in children’s bones and joints: When, how and common findings. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:1126–34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.007
Munir S, Patil K, Miller E, et al. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis of the Axial Joints: A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy and Predictive Value of Conventional MRI. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:199–210. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10475
García-Basteiro AL, DiNardo A, Saavedra B, et al. Point of care diagnostics for tuberculosis. Pulmonology. 2018;24:73–85. doi: 10.1016/j.rppnen.2017.12.002
Allen-Rhoades W, Whittle SB, Rainusso N. Pediatric Solid Tumors in Children and Adolescents: An Overview. Pediatr Rev. 2018;39:444–53. doi: 10.1542/pir.2017-0268
Zucker EJ, Lee EY, Restrepo R, et al. Hip Disorders in Children. Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:W776–96. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.10623
Jones NL, Koletzko S, Goodman K, et al. Joint ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN Guidelines for the Management of Helicobacter pylori in Children and Adolescents (Update 2016). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017;64:991–1003. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001594
Kotilea K, Cadranel S, Salame A, et al. Efficacy and safety of bismuth‐based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in children. Helicobacter. 2021;26:e12825. doi: 10.1111/hel.12825
Sierra D, Wood M, Kolli S, et al. Pediatric Gastritis, Gastropathy, and Peptic Ulcer Disease. Pediatr Rev. 2018;39:542–9. doi: 10.1542/pir.2017-0234
Belmer S.V., Kornienko E.A., Volynets G.V., Gurova M.M., Zvyagin A.A., Kamalova A.A., Luppova N.E., Nizhevich A.A., Novikova V.P., Pechkurov D.V., Privorotsky V.F., Sataev V.U., Tyazheva A.A., Fayzullina R.A., Khavkin A.I. Diagnosis and treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Experimental and Clinical Gastroenterology. 2021;(9):119-127. https://doi.org/10.31146/1682-8658-ecg-193-9-119-127.
Bzarova T.M., Shcherbakov P.L., Alekseeva E.I., Chistyakova E.G., and Valieva S.I. “Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children with juvenile arthritis” Issues of Modern Pediatrics, vol. 6, no. 4, 2007, pp. 17-22.
Pichler J, Ong C, Shah N, et al. Histopathological features of gastrointestinal mucosal biopsies in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Res. 2016;79:895–901. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.27
Ashorn M, Verronen P, Ruuska T, et al. Upper endoscopic findings in children with active juvenile chronic arthritis. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92:558–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb02506.x
Len C, Hilario MO, Kawakami E, et al. Gastroduodenal lesions in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:991–6.
Weber P, Brune T, Ganser G, et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms and permeability in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003;21:657–62.
Listopadova A. P. et al. Etiological structure of chronic gastritis in children with juvenile chronic arthritis // Actual Problems of Medicine. – 2014. – Vol. 28. – No. 24 (195). – P. 33-36.
Zholobova E. S. et al. Inflammatory bowel diseases in patients with systemic juvenile arthritis // Consilium Medicum. – 2023. – Vol. 25. – No. 8. – P. 529-533.
Maller J, Fox E, Park KT, et al. Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2021;48:567–74. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.200230
Broekaert IJ, Klein A, Windschall D, et al. Development of Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treated With Biologics. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2023;76:174–82. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003656
Passo MH, Fitzgerald JF, Brandt KD. Arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease in children: Relationship of joint disease to activity and severity of bowel lesion. Dig Dis Sci. 1986;31:492–7. doi: 10.1007/BF01320313
Biswas S. et al. IBD-Associated Arthritis Misdiagnosed as Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Case Report and Literature Review: 2091 // Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG. – 2018. – Vol. 113. – P. S1188-S1189.
Martín Pedraz L, Galindo Zavala R, Blasco Alonso J, et al. Crohn’s disease in a patient with systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Association or associated side effect of treatment? Reumatol Clínica Engl Ed. 2022;18:557–9. doi: 10.1016/j.reumae.2021.06.004
De Cock D, Hyrich K. Malignancy and rheumatoid arthritis: Epidemiology, risk factors and management. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2018;32:869–86. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2019.03.011
Lobo L, Antunes D. Chest CT in infants and children. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:1108–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.12.006
Quezada A, Ramos S, Garcia M, et al. Lung involvement in rheumatologic diseases in children. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2012;40:88–91. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2011.02.009
Brix N, Rosthøj S, Glerup M, et al. Identifying acute lymphoblastic leukemia mimicking juvenile idiopathic arthritis in children. PLOS ONE. 2020;15:e0237530. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237530
Allen-Rhoades W, Whittle SB, Rainusso N. Pediatric Solid Tumors in Children and Adolescents: An Overview. Pediatr Rev. 2018;39:444–53. doi: 10.1542/pir.2017-0268
Nikishina I, Kolkhidova Z, Blank L, et al. AB1260 Significance of whole-body MRI in children with rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2022;81:1739.3-1740. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.4671
Eutsler EP, Khanna G. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in children: technique and clinical applications. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46:858–72. doi: 10.1007/s00247-016-3586-y
Ćwikła JB. New imaging techniques in reumathology: MRI, scintigraphy and PET. Pol J Radiol. 2013;78:48–56. doi: 10.12659/PJR.889138
Fonseca MB, Gomes FHR, Valera ET, et al. Signs and symptoms of rheumatic diseases as first manifestation of pediatric cancer: diagnosis and prognosis implications. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed. 2017;57:330–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rbre.2017.01.007
Alias A, Rodriguez EJ, Bateman HE, et al. Rheumatology and oncology: an updated review of rheumatic manifestations of malignancy and anti-neoplastictherapy. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2012;70:109–14.
Loctin A, Bailly F, Laroche D, et al. Clinical interest of bone marrow aspiration in rheumatology: a practice-based observational study of 257 bone marrow aspirations. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32:115–21. doi: 10.1007/s10067-012-2097-y
Grebenyuk V. et al. Fever of unknown origin: case reports from routine clinical practice and a review // Klinicka Mikrobiologie a Infekcni Lekarstvi. – 2021. – Vol. 27. – No. 4. – P. 148-157.
Zakharova I.N., Osmanov I.M., Tvorogova T.M., Goryaynova A.N., Dmitrieva Yu.A., Vorobyova A.S., Koroid N.V. Prolonged fever in a child: what is the cause, how to examine, treat or not treat? Meditsinskiy Sovet = Medical Council. 2020;(10):151–162. doi: 10.21518/2079-701X-2020-10-151-162. (In Russ.)
Trapani S, Grisolia F, Simonini G, et al. Incidence of occult cancer in children presenting with musculoskeletal symptoms: a 10-year survey in a pediatric rheumatology unit. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2000;29:348–59. doi: 10.1053/sarh.2000.5752
Colamussi P, Prandini N, Cittanti C, et al. Scintigraphy in rheumatic diseases. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2004;18:909–26. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2004.07.003
Zucker EJ, Lee EY, Restrepo R, et al. Hip disorders in children. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201:W776-796. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.10623
Handa R, Upadhyaya S, Kapoor S, et al. Tuberculosis and biologics in rheumatology: A special situation. Int J Rheum Dis. 2017;20:1313–25. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13129
Cantini F, Nannini C, Niccoli L, et al. Guidance for the management of patients with latent tuberculosis infection requiring biologic therapy in rheumatology and dermatology clinical practice. Autoimmun Rev. 2015;14:503–9. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2015.01.011
Clemente D, Cuadros EN, Lovillo MC, et al. Position statement on infection screening, prophylaxis, and vaccination of pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases and immunosuppressive therapies, part 3: precautions in situations of surgery, fever, and opportunistic infections. Eur J Pediatr. 2023;183:915–27. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05295-4
Bovid KM, Moore MD. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis for the Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon. Orthop Clin North Am. 2019;50:471–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2019.06.003
Clarke SLN, Sen ES, Ramanan AV. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2016;14:27. doi: 10.1186/s12969-016-0088-2
Garbrecht JL, Powell ZR, McClard CK, et al. Frosted branch angiitis in a patient with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2024;24:106. doi: 10.1186/s12886-024-03373-1
Radwan‐Oczko M, Duś‐Ilnicka I, Richards P, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis patients’ oral health and disease activity. Int J Rheum Dis. 2019;22:1538–43. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13590
Lvovich S, Goldsmith DP. Neurological Complications of Rheumatic Disease. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2017;24:54–9. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2016.12.007
Shiari R. Neurologic manifestations of childhood rheumatic diseases. Iran J Child Neurol. 2012;6:1–7.
Ben-Chetrit E, Gattorno M, Gul A, et al. Consensus proposal for taxonomy and definition of the autoinflammatory diseases (AIDs): a Delphi study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:1558–65. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212515
Dumas G, Arabi YM, Bartz R, et al. Diagnosis and management of autoimmune diseases in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2024;50:17–35. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07266-7
Röher K, Trieschmann U, Leister N. Anästhesie und Analgosedierung für diagnostische Eingriffe bei Kindern. AINS - Anästhesiol · Intensivmed · Notfallmedizin · Schmerzther. 2023;58:409–20. doi: 10.1055/a-1925-7009
Janssen NM, Karnad DR, Guntupalli KK. Rheumatologic diseases in the intensive care unit: epidemiology, clinical approach, management, and outcome. Crit Care Clin. 2002;18:729–48. doi: 10.1016/S0749-0704(02)00025-8
Hynes L, Saetes S, McGuire B, et al. Child and Family Adaptation to Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis—A Systematic Review of the Role of Resilience Resources and Mechanisms. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2445. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02445
Frye WS, Milojevic D. The Role of Psychology in Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2022;69:965–74. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2022.05.009
Chyzheuskaya I. et al. THU0508 Psychological features of children with rheumatic diseases. – 2017.
LeBovidge JS. Psychological Adjustment of Children and Adolescents WithChronic Arthritis: A Meta-analytic Review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2003;28:29–39. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/28.1.29
Ferro MA, Boyle MH. Self-concept among youth with a chronic illness: A meta-analytic review. Health Psychol. 2013;32:839–48. doi: 10.1037/a0031861
Cousino MK, Hazen RA. Parenting Stress Among Caregivers of Children With Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review. J Pediatr Psychol. 2013;38:809–28. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jst049
Knafl K, Leeman J, Havill NL, et al. The Contribution of Parent and Family Variables to the Well-Being of Youth With Arthritis. J Fam Nurs. 2015;21:579–616. doi: 10.1177/1074840715601475
Yamaguchi M, Ohta A, Tsunematsu T, et al. Preliminary criteria for classification of adult Still’s disease. J Rheumatol. 1992;19:424–30.
Martini A, Ravelli A, Avcin T, et al. Toward New Classification Criteria for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: First Steps, Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization International Consensus. J Rheumatol. 2019;46:190–7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.180168
Ravelli A, Davì S, Minoia F, et al. Macrophage Activation Syndrome. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2015;29:927–41. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2015.06.010
Henderson LA, Cron RQ. Macrophage Activation Syndrome and Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Childhood Inflammatory Disorders: Diagnosis and Management. Pediatr Drugs. 2020;22:29–44. doi: 10.1007/s40272-019-00367-1
Shakoory B, Carcillo JA, Chatham WW, et al. Interleukin-1 Receptor Blockade Is Associated With Reduced Mortality in Sepsis Patients With Features of Macrophage Activation Syndrome: Reanalysis of a Prior Phase III Trial*. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:275–81. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001402
Hines MR, von Bahr Greenwood T, Beutel G, et al. Consensus-Based Guidelines for the Recognition, Diagnosis, and Management of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Critically Ill Children and Adults. Crit Care Med. 2022;50:860–72. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005361
Avčin T, Tse SML, Schneider R, et al. Macrophage activation syndrome as the presenting manifestation of rheumatic diseases in childhood. J Pediatr. 2006;148:683–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.12.070
Lehmberg K, Pink I, Eulenburg C, et al. Differentiating Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis from Other Forms of Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis. J Pediatr. 2013;162:1245–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.081
Yokoyama T, Shimizu M, Ikeno I, et al. [Case of systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis complicated with sepsis --usefulness of cytokine profile for the differentiation between macrophage activation syndrome and sepsis]. Nihon Rinsho Meneki Gakkai Kaishi. 2011;34:105–11. doi: 10.2177/jsci.34.105
Chen T-Y, Hsu M-H, Kuo H-C, et al. Outcome analysis of pediatric hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2021;120:172–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2020.03.025
Rajagopal R, Thachil J, Monagle P. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in paediatrics. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102:187–93. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311053
Rigante D, Emmi G, Fastiggi M, et al. Macrophage activation syndrome in the course of monogenic autoinflammatory disorders. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34:1333–9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-2923-0
Valade S, Mariotte E, Azoulay E. Coagulation Disorders in Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis/Macrophage Activation Syndrome. Crit Care Clin. 2020;36:415–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2019.12.004
Shakoory B, Geerlinks A, Wilejto M, et al. The 2022 EULAR/ACR points to consider at the early stages of diagnosis and management of suspected haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/macrophage activation syndrome (HLH/MAS). Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82:1271–85. doi: 10.1136/ard-2023-224123
Valade S, Azoulay E, Galicier L, et al. Coagulation Disorders and Bleedings in Critically Ill Patients With Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e1692. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001692
Li Z, Xiao J, Song H, et al. Evaluation of coagulation disorders by thromboelastography in children with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2019;28:181–8. doi: 10.1177/0961203318819137
Sepúlveda M P, Salgado U A, Barriga G J, et al. Usefulness of the thromboelastogram in children: correlation with habitual coagulation tests. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2019;90:617–23. doi: 10.32641/rchped.v90i6.930
Law C, Raffini L. A Guide to the Use of Anticoagulant Drugs in Children. Pediatr Drugs. 2015;17:105–14. doi: 10.1007/s40272-015-0120-x
Bagri NK, Gupta L, Sen ES, et al. Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Children: Diagnosis and Management. Indian Pediatr. 2021;58:1155–61. doi: 10.1007/s13312-021-2399-8
Abolghasemi H, Shahverdi E, Niknam R, et al. Macrophage Activation Syndrome as the First Presentation of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. IJBC. 2017;9:93–6.
Ansuini V, Rigante D, Esposito S. Debate around infection-dependent hemophagocytic syndrome in paediatrics. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-15
D’Errico MM, Cuoco F, Biancardi C, et al. YIM-P58. Macrophage activation syndrome: the role of infectious triggers. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2014;12:Y5, 1546-0096-12-S1-Y5. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-12-S1-Y5
Eloseily EM, Cron RQ. Macrophage Activation Syndrome. In: Ragab G, Atkinson TP, Stoll ML, eds. The Microbiome in Rheumatic Diseases and Infection. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2018:151–82.
Long S. S., Pickering L. K., Prober C. G. Principles and practice of pediatric infectious diseases. – 2023.
Xu D, Li S, Chen Z, et al. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in different respiratory specimens. Eur J Pediatr. 2011;170:851–8. doi: 10.1007/s00431-010-1360-y
Copete AR, Vera C, Herrera M, et al. Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Children With and Without Community-acquired Pneumonia. What do PCR and Serology Say? Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39:e104–8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002636
Waris ME, Toikka P, Saarinen T, et al. Diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae Pneumonia in Children. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:3155–9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.11.3155-3159.1998
Department of Microbiology, Maulana Azad Medical College, India, Kumar S, Kumar S, et al. Mycoplasma Pneumoniae as a Causative Agent of Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Children. Ann Pediatr Child Health. 2023;11:1–4. doi: 10.47739/2373-9312.pediatrics.1325
Blanche S, Caniglia M, Fischer A, et al. Epstein-Barr Virus-Associated Hemophagocytic Syndrome: Clinical Presentation and Treatment. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1989;6:233–5. doi: 10.3109/08880018909034292
Nowalk A, Green M. Epstein-Barr Virus. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4:4.3.47. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.DMIH2-0011-2015
Zeng H-S, Xiong X-Y, Wei Y-D, et al. Macrophage activation syndrome in 13 children with systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. World J Pediatr. 2008;4:97–101. doi: 10.1007/s12519-008-0018-6
Brisse E, Matthys P, Wouters CH. Understanding the spectrum of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: update on diagnostic challenges and therapeutic options. Br J Haematol. 2016;174:175–87. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14144
Lukjanoviča K, Šlēziņa I, Dāvidsone Z, et al. Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Secondary Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Latvia from 2009 to 2020: A Nationwide Retrospective Study. Medicina (Mex). 2023;59:798. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040798
Nadimpalli S, Foca M, Satwani P, et al. Diagnostic yield of bronchoalveolar lavage in immunocompromised children with malignant and non-malignant disorders: BAL in Immunocompromised Children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52:820–6. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23644
Ers. Bronchoalveolar lavage in children. Eur Respir J. 2000;15:217–31. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00.15121700
Amanati A, Karimi A, Fahimzad A, et al. Prevalence of Human Herpes Viruses in Bronchoalveolar Lavage of Critically Ill Children Undergoing Mechanical Ventilation at a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2018;6. doi: 10.5812/pedinfect.12685
Wong JCP, Hon KLE, Leung KKY, et al. Diagnostic Yield of Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Immunocompromised Children. J Trop Pediatr. 2021;67:fmaa131. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmaa131
Özkoç S, Bayram Deli̇Baş S. Investigation of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia and Colonization in Iatrogenically Immunosuppressed and Immunocompetent Patients. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2015;49:221–30. doi: 10.5578/mb.9344
Eroglu‐Ertugrul NG, Yalcin E, Oguz B, et al. The value of flexible bronchoscopy in pulmonary infections of immunosuppressed children. Clin Respir J. 2020;14:78–84. doi: 10.1111/crj.13103
Gonski K, Cohn R, Widger J, et al. Utility of bronchoscopy in immunocompromised paediatric patients: Systematic review. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2020;34:24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.02.003
Lachant DJ, Croft DP, McGrane Minton H, et al. The clinical impact of pneumocystis and viral PCR testing on bronchoalveolar lavage in immunosuppressed patients. Respir Med. 2018;145:35–40. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.10.021
Varadaraju S, Khandelwal P, Sankar J, et al. Multiple opportunistic infection-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in nephrotic syndrome: A case report. J Pediatr Crit Care. 2021;8:295. doi: 10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_64_21
Weyant RB, Kabbani D, Doucette K, et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii: a review with a focus on prevention and treatment. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021;22:1579–92. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1915989
Morris A, Norris KA. Colonization by Pneumocystis jirovecii and Its Role in Disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2012;25:297–317. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00013-12
White PL, Price JS, Backx M. Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia: Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestation and Diagnosis. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2019;13:260–73. doi: 10.1007/s12281-019-00349-3
Schüller M, Macků M, Fráňová J. Pneumocystis pneumonia in a child with sojia. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2014;12:P225, 1546-0096-12-S1-P225. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-12-S1-P225
Saper V. E. et al. Emergent high fatality lung disease in systemic juvenile arthritis // Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. – 2019. – Vol. 78. – No. 12. – P. 1722-1731.
Rayment JH, Narang I. Pulmonary Aspergillosis in a Previously Healthy 13-Year-Old Boy. Can Respir J. 2016;2016:4575942. doi: 10.1155/2016/4575942
de Mol M, de Jongste JC, van Westreenen M, et al. Diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in children with bronchoalveolar lavage galactomannan: BAL Galactomannan Aspergillosis Children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2013;48:789–96. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22670
Zhao M, Guan Y, Lin J, et al. Acute kidney injury in critical care: complications of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1396124. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1396124
Fitzgerald NE, MacClain KL. Imaging characteristics of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33:392–401. doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-0894-9
Schmidt MH, Sung L, Shuckett BM. Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis in Children: Abdominal US Findings within 1 Week of Presentation. Radiology. 2004;230:685–9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2303030223
Chinnici A, Beneforti L, Pegoraro F, et al. Approaching hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1210041. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1210041
Malik P, Antonini L, Mannam P, et al. MRI Patterns in Pediatric CNS Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis. Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42:2077–85. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7292
Shieh AC, Guler E, Smith DA, et al. Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A Primer for Radiologists. Am J Roentgenol. 2020;214:W11–9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21788
Hur M, Kim YC, Lee KM, et al. Macrophage Activation Syndrome in a Child with Systemic Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Korean Med Sci. 2005;20:695. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2005.20.4.695
Behrens EM, Beukelman T, Paessler M, et al. Occult macrophage activation syndrome in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:1133–8.
Shekarchian F, Abadi MKA, Shariati MM. Clinical approach to a child with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis and bilateral optic nerve head infiltration: A case report and brief literature review. Clin Case Rep. 2023;11:e7999. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.7999
Wang L, Suo L, Kou F, et al. Ocular Phenotypes in Patients With Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis: A Retrospective Analysis in a Single Center Over 7 Years. Am J Ophthalmol. 2023;253:119–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.05.011
García-Domínguez M. et al. Atypical eye manifestation in macrophage activation syndrome complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis // Alergia, Asma e Inmunología Pediátricas. – 2020. – Vol. 29. – No. 2. – P. 66-70.
Ravelli A, Minoia F, Davì S, et al. 2016 Classification Criteria for Macrophage Activation Syndrome Complicating Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology/Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation Collaborative Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:481–9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208982
Kriulin I.A., Alekseeva E.I., Shilgrot I.Yu., Dvoryakovskaya T.M. Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: prognostic model and early development markers in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Results of a cohort retrospective study. Voprosy Prakticheskoy Pediatrii = Clinical Practice in Pediatrics. 2022; 17(6): 17–24. DOI: 10.20953/1817-7646-2022-6-17-24 (In Russ.)
Onel K, Rumsey DG, Shenoi S. Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treatment Updates. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 2021;47:545–63. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2021.07.009
Pan S, Yu H, Surti A, et al. Pharmacodynamics of rituximab on B lymphocytes in paediatric patients with autoimmune diseases. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85:1790–7. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13970
McAtee CL, Lubega J, Underbrink K, et al. Association of Rituximab Use With Adverse Events in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4:e2036321. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36321
Smolewska E, Cebula B, Brózik H, et al. Relationship between impaired apoptosis of lymphocytes and distribution of dendritic cells in peripheral blood and synovial fluid of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2008;56:283–9. doi: 10.1007/s00005-008-0030-5
Bateman M, Oladele R, Kolls JK. Diagnosing Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia: A review of current methods and novel approaches. Med Mycol. 2020;58:1015–28. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myaa024
Park JW, Curtis JR, Kim MJ, et al. Pneumocystis pneumonia in patients with rheumatic diseases receiving prolonged, non-high-dose steroids—clinical implication of primary prophylaxis using trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019;21:207. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-1996-6
Sulieman SE, Metjian TA, Zaoutis TE, et al. Pneumocystis Pneumonia: Epidemiology and Options for Prophylaxis in Non-HIV Immunocompromised Pediatric Patients. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2014;8:45–55. doi: 10.1007/s12281-014-0177-y
García-Moreno J, Melendo-Pérez S, Martín-Gómez MT, et al. Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia in children. A retrospective study in a single center over three decades. Enfermedades Infecc Microbiol Clínica. 2020;38:111–8. doi: 10.1016/j.eimc.2019.05.005
Kim YW, Kwon BS, Lim SY, et al. Diagnostic value of bronchoalveolar lavage and bronchial washing in sputum-scarce or smear-negative cases with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis: a randomized study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26:911–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.11.013
Daelemans, Siel & Peeters, Linde & Wachter, Elke & Malfroot, Anne. (2019). Challenges in Diagnosing Mycobacterial Infections in Children.. 21. 194-199.
Solovic I, Sester M, Gomez-Reino JJ, et al. The risk of tuberculosis related to tumour necrosis factor antagonist therapies: a TBNET consensus statement. Eur Respir J. 2010;36:1185–206. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00028510
Qu Y, Liu M, Sun X, et al. Development and evaluation of a triplex droplet digital PCR method for differentiation of M. tuberculosis, M. bovis and BCG. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1397792. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1397792
Bal ZS, Yazici P, Sen S, et al. A fatal case of tuberculous meningitis in a child with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a diagnostic challenge. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2017;50:709–11. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0410-2016
Armbrust W, Kamphuis SSM, Wolfs TWF, et al. Tuberculosis in a nine-year-old girl treated with infliximab for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology. 2004;43:527–9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh074
Noguera-Julian A, Calzada-Hernández J, Brinkmann F, et al. Tuberculosis Disease in Children and Adolescents on Therapy With Antitumor Necrosis Factor-ɑ Agents: A Collaborative, Multicenter Paediatric Tuberculosis Network European Trials Group (ptbnet) Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71:2561–9. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz1138
Restrepo-Gualteros SM, Gutierrez MJ, Villamil-Osorio M, et al. Challenges and Clinical Implications of the Diagnosis of Cytomegalovirus Lung Infection in Children. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2019;21:24. doi: 10.1007/s11908-019-0681-x
Lyu J, Deng Q, Li R, et al. Pneumonia Caused by Coinfection with Cytomegalovirus and Pneumocystis jirovecii in an HIV-Negative Infant Diagnosed by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;Volume 15:3417–25. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S364241
Ramos JT, Romero CA, Belda S, et al. Clinical practice update of antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised children. Rev Espanola Quimioter Publicacion Of Soc Espanola Quimioter 2019;32:410–25.
Tragiannidis A, Kyriakidis I, Zündorf I, et al. Invasive fungal infections in pediatric patients treated with tumor necrosis alpha (TNF-α) inhibitors. Mycoses. 2017;60:222–9. doi: 10.1111/myc.12576
Lazzerini PE, Capecchi PL, Guideri F, et al. Comparison of Frequency of Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Positive Versus Negative Anti-Ro/SSA and Connective Tissue Disease. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1029–34. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.04.048
Caforio ALP, Adler Y, Agostini C, et al. Diagnosis and management of myocardial involvement in systemic immune-mediated diseases: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2649–62. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx321
Sharma AP, Norozi K, Filler G, et al. Diagnosis of Pediatric Hypertension: European Society of Hypertension-recommended 24-hr vs. 24-hr-day-night Ambulatory Blood Pressure thresholds. ;23.
Akça ÜK, Sökmen O, Bölek EÇ, et al. A case report of intracranial hypertension and aseptic meningitis: anti-tumor necrosis factor associated or juvenile idiopathic arthritis related. Turk J Pediatr. 2021;63:522–6. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2021.03.022
Zhang P, Li X, Li Y, et al. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome secondary to systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A case report and review of the literature. Biomed Rep. 2015;3:55–8. doi: 10.3892/br.2014.380
Koenig MK, Perez M, Rothenberg S, et al. Juvenile Onset Central Nervous System Folate Deficiency and Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Child Neurol. 2008;23:106–7. doi: 10.1177/0883073807307986
Coşkun AN, Günbey C, Göçmen R, et al. Concurrence of juvenile idiopathic arthritis and primary demyelinating disease in a young child. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019;27:20–2. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.10.002
Lourenço DMR, Buscatti IM, Lourenço B, et al. Neurite óptica em paciente com artrite idiopática juvenil. Rev Bras Reumatol. 2014;54:486–9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbr.2014.01.011
Weng Y, Yi C, Liang H, et al. The Brain Structural-Functional Vulnerability in Drug-Naive Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Insights From the Hippocampus. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;16:833602. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.833602
Cao Z-Y, Wang N, Jia J-T, et al. Abnormal topological organization in systemic lupus erythematosus: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis. Brain Imaging Behav. 2021;15:14–24. doi: 10.1007/s11682-019-00228-y
Mavrogeni S, Koutsogeorgopoulou L, Dimitroulas T, et al. Combined Brain/Heart Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2020;16:178–86. doi: 10.2174/1573403X15666190801122105
Goh YP, Naidoo P, Ngian G-S. Imaging of systemic lupus erythematosus. Part II: Gastrointestinal, renal, and musculoskeletal manifestations. Clin Radiol. 2013;68:192–202. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.06.109
Fotis L, Baszis KW, French AR, et al. Mesenteric vasculitis in children with systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2016;35:785–93. doi: 10.1007/s10067-015-2892-3
Lalani TA, Kanne JP, Hatfield GA, et al. Imaging Findings in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. RadioGraphics. 2004;24:1069–86. doi: 10.1148/rg.244985082
Zajaczkowska M, Papierkowski A, Szczepanowska A, et al. [Influence of glucocorticoid steroid therapy on gastric and duodenal mucosa and Helicobacter pylori infection in children with nephrotic syndrome]. Pol Merkur Lek Organ Pol Tow Lek. 2001;10:165–7.
Wobma H, Bachrach R, Farrell J, et al. Development of a Screening Algorithm for Lung Disease in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2023;5:556–62. doi: 10.1002/acr2.11600
Galindo-Zavala R, Bou-Torrent R, Magallares-López B, et al. Expert panel consensus recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of secondary osteoporosis in children. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2020;18:20. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-0411-9
Buckley L, Guyatt G, Fink HA, et al. 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Prevention and Treatment of Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: ACR guideline for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69:1521–37. doi: 10.1002/art.40137
Harari S, Paciocco G, Aramu S. Ear and nose involvement in systemic diseases. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis Arch Monaldi Mal Torace. 2000;55:466–70.
Stoustrup P, Resnick CM, Abramowicz S, et al. Management of Orofacial Manifestations of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Interdisciplinary Consensus‐Based Recommendations. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023;75:4–14. doi: 10.1002/art.42338
Walton AG, Welbury RR, Thomason JM, et al. Oral health and juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a review. Rheumatology. 2000;39:550–5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.5.550
Whittle, Vanessa & Gane, J & Cheetham, T. (2017). G169(P) Management of steroid induced diabetes in children: A national perspective. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 102. A69.1-A69. 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313087.168.
Fc A. The Portuguese Society of Rheumatology position paper on the use of biosimilars – 2017 update. 2017.
Atzeni F, Sebastiani M, Ricci C, et al. Position paper of Italian rheumatologists on the use of biosimilar drugs.
Abad Hernández MÁ, Andreu JL, Caracuel Ruiz MÁ, et al. Position Paper From the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on Biosimilar Drugs. Reumatol Clínica Engl Ed. 2015;11:269–78. doi: 10.1016/j.reumae.2015.03.012
Huizinga TWJ, Torii Y, Muniz R. Adalimumab Biosimilars in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review of the Evidence for Biosimilarity. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8:41–61. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00259-8
Levy DM, Imundo LF. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: A survey of practices and concerns of pediatric medical and surgical specialists and a summary of available safety data. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2010;8:7. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-8-7
Litalien C, Jacqz-Aigrain E. Risks and benefits of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in children. Paediatr Drugs. 2001;3(11):817-58.
Hollingworth P. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in paediatric rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology. 1993;32(1):73-7.
Guillaume-Czitrom S. Les anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens dans les rhumatismes inflammatoires chroniques de l’enfant [Non -steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in chronic inflammatory arthritis in children]. La Lettre du Rhumatologue №379-380 - février-mars 2012.
Gupta P, Sachdev HP. Safety of oral use of nimesulide in children: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Indian Pediatr. 2003 Jun;40(6):518-31. PMID: 12824661.
Todd PA, Sorkin EM. Diclofenac Sodium: A Reappraisal of its Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Properties, and Therapeutic Efficacy. Drugs. 1988;35:244–85. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198835030-00004
Standing J. F. Diclofenac for acute pain in children: Pharmacokinetics and safety. – University of London, University College London (United Kingdom), 2007.
Iosifovna AE, S.i V. Evaluation of the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of nimesulide in children with juvenile arthritis. Current Pediatrics. 2007;6:76–80.
Sherman JM, Sood SK. Current challenges in the diagnosis and management of fever. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012;24:400–6. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835333e3
Ringold S, Weiss PF, Beukelman T, et al. 2013 update of the 2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: recommendations for the medical therapy of children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and tuberculosis screening among children receiving biologic medications. Arthritis Care Res. 2013;65:1551–63. doi: 10.1002/acr.22087
Beukelman T, Patkar NM, Saag KG, et al. 2011 American College of Rheumatology recommendations for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: initiation and safety monitoring of therapeutic agents for the treatment of arthritis and systemic features. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:465–82. doi: 10.1002/acr.20460
Adiguzel Dundar H, Acari C, Turkucar S, et al. Treatment of systemic JIA: When do we need a biologic? Real world data of a single center. Mod Rheumatol. 2021;31:684–90. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1761079
Hinze CH, Foell D, Kessel C. Treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023;19:778–89. doi: 10.1038/s41584-023-01042-z
Vannucci G, Cantarini L, Giani T, et al. Glucocorticoids in the Management of Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Pediatr Drugs. 2013;15:343–9. doi: 10.1007/s40272-013-0038-0
Grevich S, Shenoi S. Update on the management of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis and role of IL-1 and IL-6 inhibition. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2017;8:125–35. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S109495
Jones AP, Clayton D, Nkhoma G, et al. Different corticosteroid induction regimens in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the SIRJIA mixed-methods feasibility study. Health Technol Assess. 2020;24:1–152. doi: 10.3310/hta24360
https://neo.barnlakarforeningen.se/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2015/05/Medical-treatment-of-juvenile-idiopathic-arthritis.pdf https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15252213/.
Rubin S, Ohana O, Goldberg O, et al. The efficacy and safety of intra-articular injection of triamcinolone acetonide versus triamcinolone hexacetonide for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2022;20:5. doi: 10.1186/s12969-022-00666-x
Zulian F. Triamcinolone acetonide and hexacetonide intra-articular treatment of symmetrical joints in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a double-blind trial. Rheumatology. 2004;43:1288–91. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keh313
Hetland ML, Stengaard-Pedersen K, Junker P, et al. Combination treatment with methotrexate, cyclosporine, and intraarticular betamethasone compared with methotrexate and intraarticular betamethasone in early active rheumatoid arthritis: An investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:1401–9. doi: 10.1002/art.21796
Scherer J, Rainsford KD, Kean CA, et al. Pharmacology of intra-articular triamcinolone. Inflammopharmacology. 2014;22:201–17. doi: 10.1007/s10787-014-0205-0
Zulian F, Martini G, Gobber D, et al. Comparison of intra-articular triamcinolone hexacetonide and triamcinolone acetonide in oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2003;42:1254–9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keg358
Textbook of Pediatric Rheumatology. Elsevier 2016.
Ferrara G, Mastrangelo G, Barone P, et al. Methotrexate in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: advice and recommendations from the MARAJIA expert consensus meeting. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2018;16:46. doi: 10.1186/s12969-018-0255-8
Ruperto N, Murray KJ, Gerloni V, et al. A randomized trial of parenteral methotrexate comparing an intermediate dose with a higher dose in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis who failed to respond to standard doses of methotrexate. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:2191–201. doi: 10.1002/art.20288
Giannini EH, Brewer EJ, Kuzmina N, et al. Methotrexate in Resistant Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis: Results of the U.S.A.–U.S.S.R. Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1043–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199204163261602
Ravelli, A., Migliavacca, D., Viola, S., Ruperto, N., Pistorio, A., & Martini, A. (1999). Efficacy of folinic arid in reducing methotrexate toxicity in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clinical and experimental rheumatology, 17, 625-627.
LRI Children’s Hospital Paediatric Rheumatology Methotrexate therapy/ url https://secure.library.leicestershospitals.nhs.uk/PAGL/Shared%20Documents/Methotrexate%20Therapy%20in%20Paediatric%20Rheumatology%20UHL%20Childrens%20Hospital%20Guideline.pdf.
Niehues T, Lankisch P. Recommendations for the Use of Methotrexate in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Pediatr Drugs. 2006;8:347–56. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200608060-00003
Calvo I, Antón J, López Robledillo JC, et al. Recomendaciones para el uso de metotrexato en pacientes con artritis idiopática juvenil. An Pediatría. 2016;84:177.e1-177.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2015.05.005
Foeldvari I, Wierk A. Effectiveness of leflunomide in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in clinical practice. J Rheumatol. 2010;37:1763–7. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090874
Ringold S, Angeles‐Han ST, Beukelman T, et al. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Therapeutic Approaches for Non‐Systemic Polyarthritis, Sacroiliitis, and Enthesitis. Arthritis Care Res. 2019;71:717–34. doi: 10.1002/acr.23870
Harris JG, Kessler EA, Verbsky JW. Update on the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013;13:337–46. doi: 10.1007/s11882-013-0351-2
Kimura Y, Beukelman T, Morgan-DeWitt E, et al. Results from the Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance Systemic JIA Consensus Treatment Plans Pilot Study. ACR Meeting Abstracts. San Francisco, CA 2015.
Nigrovic PA. Review: is there a window of opportunity for treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis? Arthritis Rheumatol Hoboken NJ. 2014;66:1405–13. doi: 10.1002/art.38615
Ravelli A, Consolaro A, Horneff G, et al. Treating juvenile idiopathic arthritis to target: recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:819–28. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213030
Tarp S, Amarilyo G, Foeldvari I, et al. Efficacy and safety of biological agents for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2016;55:669–79. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev382
Yokota S, Itoh Y, Morio T, et al. Tocilizumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a real-world clinical setting: results from 1 year of postmarketing surveillance follow-up of 417 patients in Japan. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:1654–60. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207818
Ruperto N, Brunner HI, Ramanan AV, et al. Subcutaneous dosing regimens of tocilizumab in children with systemic or polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Rheumatology. 2021;60:4568–80. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab047
Arthur VL, Shuldiner E, Remmers EF, et al. IL1RN Variation Influences Both Disease Susceptibility and Response to Recombinant Human Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Therapy in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol Hoboken NJ. 2018;70:1319–30. doi: 10.1002/art.40498
Grom AA, Ilowite NT, Pascual V, et al. Rate and Clinical Presentation of Macrophage Activation Syndrome in Patients With Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Treated With Canakinumab. Arthritis Rheumatol Hoboken NJ. 2016;68:218–28. doi: 10.1002/art.39407
Nishimura K, Hara R, Umebayashi H, et al. Efficacy and safety of canakinumab in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: 48-week results from an open-label phase III study in Japanese patients. Mod Rheumatol. 2021;31:226–34. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1783163
Mejbri M, Theodoropoulou K, Hofer M, et al. Interleukin-1 Blockade in Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Pediatr Drugs. 2020;22:251–62. doi: 10.1007/s40272-020-00392-5
Swart JF, Barug D, Möhlmann M, et al. The efficacy and safety of interleukin-1-receptor antagonist anakinra in the treatment of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10:1743–52. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2010.532785
Wallace CA, Giannini EH, Huang B, et al. American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria for defining clinical inactive disease in select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:929–36. doi: 10.1002/acr.20497
Alexeeva EI, Valieva SI, Bzarova TM, et al. Efficacy and safety of repeat courses of rituximab treatment in patients with severe refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30:1163–72. doi: 10.1007/s10067-011-1720-7
Feito JG, Pereda CA. Rituximab therapy produced rapid and sustained clinical improvement in a patient with systemic onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis refractory to TNF alpha antagonists. J Clin Rheumatol Pract Rep Rheum Musculoskelet Dis. 2009;15:363–5. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181ba3c6f
Kaegi C, Wuest B, Schreiner J, et al. Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab in Treating Immune-Mediated Disorders. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1990. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01990
Kearsley-Fleet L, Sampath S, McCann LJ, et al. Use and effectiveness of rituximab in children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis in a cohort study in the United Kingdom. Rheumatol Oxf Engl. 2019;58:331–5. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key306
Narváez J, Díaz-Torné C, Juanola X, et al. Rituximab therapy for refractory systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:607–8. doi: 10.1136/ard.2008.092106
Alekseeva E. I. et al. Efficacy and safety of long-term rituximab therapy in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis // Issues of Modern Pediatrics. – 2013. – Vol. 12. – No. 2. – P. 89-100.
Brunner HI, Ruperto N, Tzaribachev N, et al. Subcutaneous golimumab for children with active polyarticular-course juvenile idiopathic arthritis: results of a multicentre, double-blind, randomised-withdrawal trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77:21–9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210456
Lovell DJ, Giannini EH, Reiff A, et al. Etanercept in children with polyarticular juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:763–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200003163421103
Lovell DJ, Ruperto N, Goodman S, et al. Adalimumab with or without methotrexate in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:810–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0706290
Otten MH, Anink J, Spronk S, et al. Efficacy of biological agents in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review using indirect comparisons. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1806–12. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201991
PRO-KIND SJIA project collaborators, Hinze CH, Holzinger D, et al. Practice and consensus-based strategies in diagnosing and managing systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis in Germany. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2018;16:7. doi: 10.1186/s12969-018-0224-2
Strand V, Balsa A, Al-Saleh J, et al. Immunogenicity of Biologics in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases: A Systematic Review. BioDrugs Clin Immunother Biopharm Gene Ther. 2017;31:299–316. doi: 10.1007/s40259-017-0231-8
Wang B, Zhang Y, Zhao Z, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of different drugs in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103:e38002. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038002
Tarp S, Amarilyo G, Foeldvari I, et al. Efficacy and safety of biological agents for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Rheumatology. 2016;55:669–79. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev382
Diener C, Horneff G. Comparison of adverse events of biologicals for treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a systematic review. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2019;18:719–32. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2019.1632288
Amarilyo G, Tarp S, Foeldvari I, et al. Biological agents in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized withdrawal trials. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;46:312–8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.07.001
Okamoto N, Yokota S, Takei S, et al. Clinical practice guidance for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) 2018. Mod Rheumatol. 2019;29:41–59. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2018.1514724
Prince FHM, Twilt M, Cate RT, et al. Long-term follow-up on effectiveness and safety of etanercept in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: the Dutch national register. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:635–41. doi: 10.1136/ard.2007.087411
Emery P, Fleischmann RM, Moreland LW, et al. Golimumab, a human anti–tumor necrosis factor α monoclonal antibody, injected subcutaneously every four weeks in methotrexate‐naive patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Twenty‐four–week results of a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of golimumab before methotrexate as first‐line therapy for early‐onset rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:2272–83. doi: 10.1002/art.24638
Instructions for medical use of the medicinal product Enbrel LP-0021220931121.
Instructions for medical use of the medicinal product Etanercept PSK LP-007057-310521.
Instructions for medical use of the medicinal product Erelzi LP-006650-141220.
Instructions for medical use of the medicinal product Enbrel LSR-006652/09-050315 with Amendments No. 3.
FAS Letter dated 22.12.2021 No. TN/109573/21 "On the preparation of documentation for the procurement of medicinal products with the INN "Etanercept."
Bergman M, Patel P, Chen N, et al. Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States. Rheumatol Ther. 2021;8:109–18. doi: 10.1007/s40744-020-00256-x
Yue X, Huang B, Hincapie AL, et al. Comparative effectiveness and persistence of TNFi and non-TNFi in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a large paediatric rheumatology centre in the USA. Rheumatology. 2021;60:4063–73. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa877
Galstyan L.A., Zholobova E.S., Suchkova D.V., Chebysheva S.N., Meleshkina A.V. Experience of effective long-term use of adalimumab in the treatment of a patient with early-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis and uveitis // Pediatrics. Consilium Medicum. - 2020. - No. 2. - P. 67-71. doi: 10.26442/26586630.2020.2.200233
Fernandez JM, Madsen S, Krase JM, et al. Classification and mitigation of negative injection experiences with biologic medications. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33:e13240. doi: 10.1111/dth.13240
Houlton S. Benefits and drawbacks of moving to biosimilar medicines. Prescriber. 2019;30:13–5. doi: 10.1002/psb.1773
Ruperto N, Brunner HI, Synoverska O, et al. Tofacitinib in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, withdrawal phase 3 randomised trial. The Lancet. 2021;398:1984–96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01255-1
Huang Z, Lee PY, Yao X, et al. Tofacitinib Treatment of Refractory Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Pediatrics. 2019;143:e20182845. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-2845
Alekseeva E.I., Krekhova E.A., Kriulin I.A., Kriulina T.Yu., Dvoryakovskaya T.M., Isaeva K.B., Chistyakova E.G., Chomakhidze A.M., Lomakina O.L., Fetisova A.N., Chibisova K.V., Tsulukiya I.T., Shingarova M.Sh., Botova M.S., Kondratyeva N.M., Kokina M.Yu., Rumyantsev M.A. Experience with the JAK inhibitor upadacitinib in children with rheumatic diseases. Voprosy prakticheskoy pediatrii. 2024; 19(2): 59–79. DOI: 10.20953/1817-7646-2024-2-59-79.
Nishimura K, Ishikawa T, Okamoto N, et al. Efficacy and safety of abatacept for systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A systematic review. Mod Rheumatol. 2024;roae046. doi: 10.1093/mr/roae046
Ruperto N, Lovell DJ, Quartier P, et al. Long‐term safety and efficacy of abatacept in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:1792–802. doi: 10.1002/art.27431
Kuemmerle-Deschner J. Abatacept in difficult-to-treat juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Biol Targets Ther. 2009;865. doi: 10.2147/BTT.S3355
Lim LSH, Lokku A, Pullenayegum E, et al. Probability of Response in the First Sixteen Weeks After Starting Biologics: An Analysis of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Biologics Trials. Arthritis Care Res. 2023;acr.25003. doi: 10.1002/acr.25003
Baranov AA, Alekseeva EI, editors. Rheumatic diseases in children. Moscow: Pediatr; 2016.
Henter J-I. Treatment of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with HLH-94 immunochemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation. Blood. 2002;100:2367–73. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-01-0172
Stephan JL. Reactive haemophagocytic syndrome in children with inflammatory disorders. A retrospective study of 24 patients. Rheumatology. 2001;40:1285–92. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/40.11.1285
I.A.Kriulin IAK, Kriulin IA, National Medical Research Center for Children’s Health, Moscow, Russian Federation, et al. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: mechanisms of development, clinical manifestations, and treatments. Vopr Prakt Pediatr. 2021;16:94–102. doi: 10.20953/1817-7646-2021-6-94-102
Zhang H, Yang S-W, Fu Y-C, et al. Cytokine storm and targeted therapy in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Immunol Res. 2022;70:566–77. doi: 10.1007/s12026-022-09285-w
Kriulin I.A., Alekseeva E.I., Shilkrot I.Yu., Dvoryakovskaya T.M. Treatment of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Results of a retrospective cohort study. Voprosy Prakticheskoy Pediatrii (Current Pediatrics). 2022; 17(5): 7–19. DOI: 10.20953/1817-7646-2022-5-7-19.
Pelewicz K, Miśkiewicz P. Glucocorticoid Withdrawal—An Overview on When and How to Diagnose Adrenal Insufficiency in Clinical Practice. Diagnostics. 2021;11:728. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11040728
Alves C, Robazzi TCV, Mendonça M. Withdrawal from glucocorticosteroid therapy: clinical practice recommendations. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2008;84:192–202. doi: 10.2223/JPED.1773
Kuzmina N. I., Shokh B. P., Nikishina I. P. Current perspective on systemic glucocorticosteroid therapy in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis // Scientific and Practical Rheumatology. – 2000. – No. 2. – P. 56-62.
Mouy R, Stephan J-L, Pillet P, et al. Efficacy of cyclosporine A in the treatment of macrophage activation syndrome in juvenile arthritis: Report of five cases. J Pediatr. 1996;129:750–4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(96)70160-9
Georgiadou S, Gatselis NK, Stefos A, et al. Efficient management of secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with intravenous steroids and γ-immunoglobulin infusions. World J Clin Cases. 2019;7:3394–406. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i21.3394
Sen E. S., Clarke S. L. N., Ramanan A. V. Macrophage activation syndrome //The Indian Journal of Pediatrics. – 2016. – Vol. 83. – No. 3. – P. 248-253.
Papa R, Natoli V, Caorsi R, et al. Successful treatment of refractory hyperferritinemic syndromes with canakinumab: a report of two cases. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2020;18:56. doi: 10.1186/s12969-020-00450-9
Bhat CS, Shetty R, Ramesh D, et al. Anakinra in Refractory Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C). Indian Pediatr. 2021;58:994–6. doi: 10.1007/s13312-021-2340-1
Kostik MM, Isupova EA, Belozerov K, et al. Standard and increased canakinumab dosing to quiet macrophage activation syndrome in children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:894846. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.894846
Phadke O, Rouster-Stevens K, Giannopoulos H, et al. Intravenous administration of anakinra in children with macrophage activation syndrome. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2021;19:98. doi: 10.1186/s12969-021-00585-3
Eloseily EM, Weiser P, Crayne CB, et al. Benefit of Anakinra in Treating Pediatric Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:326–34. doi: 10.1002/art.41103
Pal P, Bathia J, Giri PP, et al. Macrophage activation syndrome in pediatrics: 10 years data from an Indian center. Int J Rheum Dis. 2020;23:1412–6. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13915
Wei A, Ma H, Li Z, et al. Short-term effectiveness of ruxolitinib in the treatment of recurrent or refractory hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in children. Int J Hematol. 2020;112:568–76. doi: 10.1007/s12185-020-02936-4
Kostik MM, Raupov RK, Suspitsin EN, et al. The Safety and Efficacy of Tofacitinib in 24 Cases of Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases: Single Centre Experience. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:820586. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.820586
Gómez Conde Santa Yarelis, Carrión Mendoza Reynaldo, del Toro Ravelo Laydenis María, Chia Proenza Daniel. Síndrome de activación de macrofágica como complicación de la artritis idiopática juvenil sistémica. Rev Cuba Reumatol [Internet]. 2021 Ago [citado 2022 Ago 02] ; 23( 2 ): e209. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1817-59962021000200011&lng=es. Epub 01-Ago-2021.
Rovin BH, Adler SG, Barratt J, et al. KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases. Kidney Int. 2021;100:S1–276. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021
Alekseeva E, Denisova R, Valieva S, et al. PReS-FINAL-2041: Macrophage activation syndrome in the children with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis during the course of tocilizumab. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2013;11:P54, 1546-0096-11-S2-P54. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-11-S2-P54
Rao S, Abzug MJ, Carosone-Link P, et al. Intravenous Acyclovir and Renal Dysfunction in Children: A Matched Case Control Study. J Pediatr. 2015;166:1462-1468.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.01.023
Kimberlin DW. Acyclovir Dosing in the Neonatal Period and Beyond. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc. 2013;2:179–82. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pis138
Widasmara D, Firdausiya F. Disseminated Herpes Zoster on a Child with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Lupus Nephritis. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;Volume 14:2777–85. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S314220
Balfour HH, McMonigal KA, Bean B. Acyclovir therapy of varicella-zoster virus infections in immunocompromised patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983;12:169–79. doi: 10.1093/jac/12.suppl_B.169
Whitley RJ. Herpes simplex virus in children. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2002;4:231–7. doi: 10.1007/s11940-002-0040-2
Antiviral Drugs in Children and Adolescents. Pediatr Infect Dis. 2020;1:123–8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10081-1221
Adler SP, Marshall B. Cytomegalovirus Infections. ;11.
Lin X, Wan Y, Liu Y. Efficacy of ganciclovir in the treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in infants and its effect on inflammatory reaction and immune function. Am J Transl Res. 2023;15:6514–23.
Shim GH. Treatment of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Clin Exp Pediatr. 2023;66:384–94. doi: 10.3345/cep.2022.01032
Zhang S, Zhu Y, Jin Y, et al. Difference between Acyclovir and Ganciclovir in the Treatment of Children with Epstein–Barr Virus-Associated Infectious Mononucleosis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2021/8996934
Chellapandian D, Das R, Zelley K, et al. Treatment of Epstein Barr virus-induced haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis with rituximab-containing chemo-immunotherapeutic regimens. Br J Haematol. 2013;162:376–82. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12386
Shimizu M, Nakagishi Y, Inoue N, et al. Interleukin-18 for predicting the development of macrophage activation syndrome in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Clin Immunol. 2015;160:277–81. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2015.06.005
Andrews A, Hickling P. Thrombosis associated with antiphospholipid antibody in juvenile chronic arthritis. Lupus. 1997;6:556–7. doi: 10.1177/096120339700600616
Thomas KN, Aggarwal A. Childhood rheumatic diseases: bites not only the joint, but also the heart. Clin Rheumatol. 2023;42:2703–15. doi: 10.1007/s10067-023-06621-9
Carcillo JA, Shakoory B, Castillo L. Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis, Macrophage Activation Syndrome, and Hyperferritinemic Sepsis-Induced Multiple-Organ Dysfunction Syndrome in the Pediatric ICU. In: Mastropietro CW, Valentine KM, eds. Pediatric Critical Care. Cham: Springer International Publishing 2019:245–55.
Alekseeva E., Valieva S., Bzarova T., Semikina E., Isaeva K., Lisitsin A., Denisova R., Chistyakova E., Sleptsova T., Mitenko E. Efficacy and safety of domestic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in neutropenias developing during anti-B-cell and immunosuppressive therapy in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Current Pediatrics. 2010;9(4):94-100.
Yilmaz D., Ritchey A. K. Severe neutropenia in children: a single institutional experience //Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. – 2007. – Vol. 29. – No. 8. – P. 513-518.
Jog NR, Young KA, Munroe ME, et al. Association of Epstein-Barr virus serological reactivation with transitioning to systemic lupus erythematosus in at-risk individuals. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78:1235–41. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215361
Segel, G. B., & Halterman, J. S. (2008). Neutropenia in pediatric practice. Pediatrics in review, 29(1), 12.
Demirkol D, Yildizdas D, Bayrakci B, et al. Hyperferritinemia in the critically ill child with secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis/sepsis/multiple organ dysfunction syndrome/macrophage activation syndrome: what is the treatment? Crit Care. 2012;16:R52. doi: 10.1186/cc11256
El-Nawawy A, El-Kinany H, Hamdy El-Sayed M, et al. Intravenous Polyclonal Immunoglobulin Administration to Sepsis Syndrome Patients: A Prospective Study in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. J Trop Pediatr. 2005;51:271–8. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmi011
Vassilopoulos A, McCormick W, Lakhani A. Update in Hyperferritinemic Syndromes: Recognition and Management - A Scoping Review. J Brown Hosp Med. 2022;1. doi: 10.56305/001c.37667
Henter J-I, Horne A, Aricó M, et al. HLH-2004: Diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;48:124–31. doi: 10.1002/pbc.21039
Malakhov O. A. et al. Hip replacement in adolescents with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis // N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. – 2012. – No. 1. – P. 48-52.
Yamamoto EA, Jørgensen TN. Relationships Between Vitamin D, Gut Microbiome, and Systemic Autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2020;10:3141. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03141
Takken T, Van Brussel M, Engelbert RHH, et al. Exercise therapy in juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Published Online First: 23 April 2008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005954.pub2
Hsieh L-F, Mao H-F, Lu C-C, et al. Rheumatologic Rehabilitation. Braddom’s Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Elsevier 2021:606-626.e1.
Luttosch F, Baerwald C. Rehabilitation in der Rheumatologie. Internist. 2010;51:1239–45. doi: 10.1007/s00108-010-2626-1
Stucki G, Kroeling P. Physical therapy and rehabilitation in the management of rheumatic disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2000;14:751–71. doi: 10.1053/berh.2000.0111
Kuntze G, Nesbitt C, Whittaker JL, et al. Exercise Therapy in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;99:178-193.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.05.030
Sarac DC, Bayraktar D, Ozer Kaya D, et al. The effects of inspiratory muscle training on cardiorespiratory functions in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2024;59:562–73. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26783
Elnaggar RK, Elfakharany MS. Aqua-Plyometric Exercises-Induced Changes in Muscle Strength, Bone Mineral Properties, and Physical Fitness in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A 12-Week, Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2023;35:198–205. doi: 10.1123/pes.2022-0044
Azab AR, Kamel FH, Basha MA, et al. Impact of Clinical Pilates Exercise on Pain, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Functional Ability, and Quality of Life in Children with Polyarticular Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:7793. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137793
Elnaggar RK, Mahmoud WS, Abdelbasset WK, et al. Low-energy laser therapy application on knee joints as an auxiliary treatment in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a dual-arm randomized clinical trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2021;37:1737–46. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03427-6
Elnaggar RK, Mahmoud WS, Moawd SA, et al. Impact of core stability exercises on bone mineralization and functional capacity in children with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40:245–53. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-05219-9
Tarakci E, Arman N, Tarakci D, et al. Leap Motion Controller–based training for upper extremity rehabilitation in children and adolescents with physical disabilities: A randomized controlled trial. J Hand Ther. 2020;33:220-228.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.03.012
Eid MAM, Aly SM, El-Shamy SM. Effect of Electromyographic Biofeedback Training on Pain, Quadriceps Muscle Strength, and Functional Ability in Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95:921–30. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000524
Elnaggar RK, Elshafey MA. Effects of Combined Resistive Underwater Exercises and Interferential Current Therapy in Patients with Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95:96–102. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000347
Field T, Hernandez-Reif M, Seligmen S, et al. Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis: Benefits from Massage Theraphy. J Pediatr Psychol. 1997;22:607–17. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/22.5.607
on behalf of PRINTO Egypt, El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, et al. Shared decision-making aid for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: moving from informative patient education to interactive critical thinking. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38:3217–25. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04687-y
Mulligan K, Hirani SP, Harris S, et al. The Effects of a Web-Based Tool for Parents of Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24:e29787. doi: 10.2196/29787
Pérez Ramírez N, Nahuelhual Cares P, San Martín Peñailillo P. Efectividad de la terapia Watsu en pacientes con artritis idiopática juvenil. Un ensayo clínico controlado paralelo, aleatorio y simple ciego. Rev Chil Pediatría. 2019;90:282. doi: 10.32641/rchped.v90i3.886
Chausset A, Gominon A-L, Montmaneix N, et al. Why we need a process on breaking news of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: a mixed methods study. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2016;14:31. doi: 10.1186/s12969-016-0092-6
Scott C, Chan M, Slamang W, et al. Juvenile arthritis management in less resourced countries (JAMLess): consensus recommendations from the Cradle of Humankind. Clin Rheumatol. 2019;38:563–75. doi: 10.1007/s10067-018-4304-y
Jansen MHA, Rondaan C, Legger GE, et al. EULAR/PRES recommendations for vaccination of paediatric patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: update 2021. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82:35–47. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222574
Heijstek MW, Ott de Bruin LM, Bijl M, et al. EULAR recommendations for vaccination in paediatric patients with rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:1704–12. doi: 10.1136/ard.2011.150193
Kokina M.Yu., Fomina D.S., Lebedkina M.S., Mutovina Z.Y., Zholobova E.S., Kurbanova S.Kh., Nargizyan A.K., Fetisova A.N., Andzhel A.E., Dvoryakovskaya T.M., Shilkrot I.Yu., Alekseeva E.I. Efficacy and safety of the two-component monoclonal antibody drug against SARS-CoV-2 (tixagevimab + cilgavimab) for pre-exposure prophylaxis of novel coronavirus infection in immunocompromised pediatric patients with rheumatic diseases. Preliminary results of the first prospective observational cohort study in the Russian Federation. Voprosy Prakticheskoy Pediatrii (Current Pediatrics). 2023; 18(1): 16–26
Alexeeva EI, Dvoryakovskaya TM, Denisova RV, et al. Immunization With a Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine in Children With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Without Systemic Manifestations: a Prospective Study. Curr Pediatr. 2017;16:493–501. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v16i6.1822
Mori S, Ueki Y, Akeda Y, et al. Pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccination in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving tocilizumab therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1362–6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202658
Alekseeva EI, Van’kova DD, Soloshenko MA, et al. Pneumococcal Vaccine in Patients with Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Receiving Biologic Therapy: International Practice Review. Curr Pediatr. 2019;18:101–8. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v18i2.2012
Novelli, V., & Holzel, H. (1999). Safety and tolerability of fluconazole in children. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 43(8), 1955-1960.
Garcia-Lloret M, McGhee S, Chatila TA. Immunoglobulin Replacement Therapy in Children. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2008;28:833–49. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2008.07.001
Rodriguez MM, Wagner-Weiner L. Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Pediatric Rheumatology: When to Use It and What Is the Evidence. Pediatr Ann. 2017;46. doi: 10.3928/19382359-20161214-01
Scientific Centre of Children’s Health, Moscow, Russian Federation, Alexeeva EI, Denisova RV, et al. Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Pediatric Rheumatology Practice. Curr Pediatr Vopr Sovrem Pediatr. 2015;14:219–23. doi: 10.15690/vsp.v14i2.1290
Mulhearn B, Bruce IN. Indications for IVIG in rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology. 2015;54:383–91. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu429
Prasad AN, Chaudhary S. Intravenous immunoglobulin in pediatrics: A review. Med J Armed Forces India. 2014;70:277–80. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.05.011
Marco H, Smith RM, Jones RB, et al. The effect of rituximab therapy on immunoglobulin levels in patients with multisystem autoimmune disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014;15:178. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-178
Barmettler S, Ong M-S, Farmer JR, et al. Association of Immunoglobulin Levels, Infectious Risk, and Mortality With Rituximab and Hypogammaglobulinemia. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1:e184169. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4169
Khojah AM, Miller ML, Klein-Gitelman MS, et al. Rituximab-associated Hypogammaglobulinemia in pediatric patients with autoimmune diseases. Pediatr Rheumatol. 2019;17:61. doi: 10.1186/s12969-019-0365-y
Gurbanov A, Gün E, Botan E, et al. Intravenous Immunoglobulin Use in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Single-Center Experience. 2023.
Tepaev RF. Disseminated intravascular coagulation syndrome in children. Diagnosis and treatment. Pediatric Pharmacology 2010;7:27–31.
Opoka-Winiarska V, Grywalska E, Sobiesiak A, et al. The Impact of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection on Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Activity and Patient’s Response to Treatment. J Clin Med. 2020;9:3453. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113453
Consolaro A, Giancane G, Alongi A, et al. Phenotypic variability and disparities in treatment and outcomes of childhood arthritis throughout the world: an observational cohort study. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2019;3:255–63. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30027-6
Ovsiankina E.S., Gubkina M.F., Panova L.V., Yuhimenko N.V. Methods of tuberculosis infection screening in children and their role in risk group formation and disease diagnosis. Rossiyskiy pediatricheskiy zhurnal. 2017; 20 (2): 108-115. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18821/1560-9561-2017-20 (2): 108-115.
Koç R, Sönmez HE, Çakan M, et al. Drug reactions in children with rheumatic diseases receiving parenteral therapies: 9 years’ experience of a tertiary pediatric rheumatology center. Rheumatol Int. 2020;40:771–6. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04498-z
Foster HE, Minden K, Clemente D, et al. EULAR/PReS standards and recommendations for the transitional care of young people with juvenile-onset rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:639–46. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210112
Allen V, Longley N. Infections in immunosuppressed travellers with autoimmune inflammatory diseases—a narrative review and advice for clinical practice. Rheumatology. 2021;60:3969–76. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab445
Whyte LA, Al-Araji RA, McLoughlin LM. Guidelines for the management of acute gastroenteritis in children in Europe. Arch Dis Child - Educ Pract Ed. 2015;100:308–12. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2014-307253
Bockemühl J, Roggentin P. Enterale Yersiniosen. Klinische Bedeutung, Epidemiologie, Diagnostik und Prävention [Intestinal yersiniosis. Clinical importance, epidemiology, diagnosis, and prevention]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2004 Jul;47(7):685-91
Wiger K., Høiby E.A., Wathne K.O. Infections in immunosuppressed children. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening: Tidsskrift for Praktisk Medicin, ny Raekke. 2005;125(9):1168-1172.
Acebo J.J. et al. Infections in Immunosuppressed Pediatric Patients. Pediatric Surgical Oncology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 1-34.
Society P. I. D. et al. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Children with and Exposed to HIV //ClinicalInfo. HIV. gov [Internet]. – US Department of Health and Human Services, 2023.
Allen UD. Management of infections in the immunocompromised child: General principles. LymphoSign J. 2016;3:87–98. doi: 10.14785/lymphosign-2016-0007
Patrick C. C. Clinical management of infections in immunocompromised infants and children //(No Title). – 2001.
Kwiatkowska B, Filipowicz‑Sosnowska A. Reactive arthritis. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2009;119:60–6. doi: 10.20452/pamw.606
Sierra D, Wood M, Kolli S, et al. Pediatric Gastritis, Gastropathy, and Peptic Ulcer Disease. Pediatr Rev. 2018;39:542–9. doi: 10.1542/pir.2017-0234
What’s New Adult and Adolescent Opportunistic Infection. AIDSinfo. https://aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines/html/4/adult-and-adolescent-opportunistic-infection/392/whats-new (accessed 14 Apr 2020).
Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Patients: Overview, Causes of Pneumonia, HIV/AIDS. Published Online First: 26 June 2021.https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/807846-overview#a11.. (accessed 10 Aug 2021).
Douglas AP, Smibert OliviaC, Bajel A, et al. Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of invasive aspergillosis, 2021. Intern Med J. 2021;51:143–76. doi: 10.1111/imj.15591
Islam MdA, Khandker SS, Alam SS, et al. Vitamin D status in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev. 2019;18:102392. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102392
Bachrach LK, Ward LM. Clinical Review: Bisphosphonate Use in Childhood Osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:400–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1531
Kutilek S, Plasilova I, Langer J. Ibandronate in the treatment of pediatric osteoporosis. Bone Abstracts. Bioscientifica 2015.
Denisova R., Alekseeva E., Pinelis V., Bakanov M., Valieva S., Bzarova T., Isaeva K., Morev S., Kuznetsova G. Efficacy and safety of intravenous ibandronic acid in severe systemic osteoporosis in patients with juvenile arthritis. Current Pediatrics. 2011;10(6):83–88.
Ansell BM, Chamberlain MA. 11 Children with chronic arthritis: the management of transition to adulthood. Baillières Clin Rheumatol. 1998;12:363–74. doi: 10.1016/S0950-3579(98)80023-X
Nascimento Leite M, Kamper SJ, O’Connell NE, et al. Physical activity and education about physical activity for chronic musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;2023. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013527.pub2
Puxeddu I, Giori L, Rocchi V, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions during treatment with infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;108:123–4. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.11.004
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
These clinical guidelines were prepared by the professional association of pediatric rheumatologists and approved by the working group of the Association of Pediatric Rheumatologists.
Alekseeva E.I., MD, PhD, Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Dvoryakovskaya T.M., MD, PhD
Shilkrot I.Yu., PhD in Medicine
Kostik M.M., MD, PhD
Nikishina I.P., PhD in Medicine
Ushakova S.A., MD, PhD, Professor
Ulyanova E.A., PhD in Medicine
Glazyrina G.A., PhD in Medicine
Zholobova E.S., MD, Professor
Sudareva O.O., PhD in Medicine
Igisheva L.N., MD, Associate Professor
Ligostaeva E.A., PhD in Medicine
Malievsky V.A., MD, Professor
I.A. Kriulin, Cand. Sc. (Med.), Senior Research Fellow
Kriulina T.Yu., Junior Research Fellow
Conflict of interest: the working group members declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience:
Pediatricians
Pediatric rheumatologists of pediatric rheumatology departments
Pediatric rheumatologists of pediatric rheumatology offices in outpatient clinics
Methods used for collecting/selecting evidence: electronic database search.
Description of methods used for assessing the quality and strength of evidence: the evidence base for the recommendations includes publications from the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases. The search depth is 5 years.
Methods used for assessing the quality and strength of evidence:
expert consensus;
assessment of significance in accordance with the rating scheme.
Methods used for analyzing evidence:
reviews of published meta-analyses;
systematic reviews with evidence tables.
Description of methods used for analyzing evidence
When selecting publications as potential sources of evidence, the methodology used in each study is examined to ensure its validity. The result of this examination affects the level of evidence assigned to the publication, which in turn affects the strength of the recommendations.
To minimize potential bias, each study was evaluated independently. Any discrepancies in evaluations were discussed by the full panel of authors. If a consensus could not be reached, an independent expert was involved.
Evidence tables: compiled by the authors of the clinical guidelines.
Methods used for formulating recommendations: expert consensus.
Economic analysis
Cost analysis was not performed, and pharmacoeconomic publications were not analyzed.
Recommendation validation method
External expert review.
Internal expert review.
Description of the recommendation validation method
The draft of these recommendations was reviewed by independent experts who were primarily asked to comment on how comprehensible the interpretation of the evidence underlying the recommendations is.
Feedback was obtained from primary care pediatric rheumatologists regarding the clarity and practical relevance of the proposed recommendations as a daily clinical tool.
All comments received from experts were carefully systematized and discussed by the authors of the recommendations. Each point was discussed individually.
Consultation and peer review
The draft recommendations were reviewed by independent experts who evaluated the clarity and accuracy of the interpretation of the evidence base underlying the recommendations.
Authors
For the final revision and quality control, the recommendations were re-evaluated by the members of the working group, who concluded that all comments and feedback from the experts had been taken into account and the risk of bias in the development of the recommendations was minimized.
Table 1. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Scale for grading levels of evidence certainty (LEC) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definition |
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Scale for grading grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms
Diagram 1

Diagram 2

Diagram 3

Diagram 4

Diagram 5

Diagram 6

Appendix C. Patient Information
1. What is idiopathic arthritis?
What is it?
Systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (synonym: systemic juvenile arthritis) is a chronic disease characterized by persistent joint inflammation. Typical signs of joint inflammation include pain, swelling, and restricted movement. "Idiopathic" means that the cause of the disease is unknown, while "juvenile" in this context means that symptoms typically begin before the age of 16.
What does "chronic disease" mean?
A disease is considered chronic when the appropriate treatment does not always lead to a cure, but helps reduce symptoms and improve laboratory parameters. It also means that once the diagnosis is established, it is impossible to predict how long the child will be ill.
What is its frequency?
sJIA is a relatively rare disease, affecting approximately 1 to 2 children out of every 1,000.
What are the causes of the disease?
Our immune system protects us against infections caused by various microorganisms, such as viruses or bacteria. It is able to distinguish what is potentially foreign and harmful and must be destroyed from what is part of our own body. It is believed that sJIA is an abnormal reaction of our immune system, which partially loses the ability to distinguish "foreign" cells from "self" and attacks its own body parts, leading to inflammation, particularly of the joint lining. For this reason, diseases like sJIA are also called "autoimmune." This means that the immune system reacts "against its own body." However, exact information about the mechanisms causing sJIA, as well as most chronic inflammatory human diseases, is lacking.
Is this a hereditary disease?
sJIA is not a hereditary disease, as it cannot be passed directly from parents to their children. Nevertheless, there are a number of genetic factors, mostly not yet identified, that create a predisposition to the disease. There is a scientific consensus that this disease is the result of a combination of genetic predisposition and environmental factors (including infectious agents). But even when a genetic predisposition may be present, two children in the same family very rarely develop this disease.
On what basis is this disease diagnosed?
The diagnosis of sJIA is based on the presence and persistence of arthritis, while carefully excluding any other disease through a medical history review, physical examination, and laboratory tests. The diagnosis of sJIA is made if the disease begins before the age of 16, symptoms last for more than 6 weeks, and all other diseases causing arthritis are excluded. This 6-week period is necessary to rule out other forms of transient arthritis that may result from various infections. The term sJIA includes all forms of persistent arthritis of unknown origin that begin in childhood. sJIA encompasses various already identified forms of arthritis (see below). Therefore, the diagnosis of sJIA is based on the presence and persistence of arthritis with the careful exclusion of any other disease through the review of medical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests.
What happens to the joints?
The synovial membrane is a thin inner layer of the joint capsule. In arthritis, it becomes significantly thickened, infiltrated with inflammatory cells, and its tissue becomes inflamed. At the same time, the production of synovial fluid inside the joint increases. This causes swelling, pain, and restricted movement. A characteristic feature of joint inflammation is stiffness, which occurs after prolonged periods of rest, especially noticeable in the morning (morning stiffness).
Often, a child tries to reduce pain by keeping the joint in a semi-flexed position. This position is called "antalgic." This term emphasizes that it is aimed at reducing pain. If this incorrect posture persists for a long time (usually more than 1 month), it leads to shortening (contracture) of muscles and tendons and the development of flexion (extension) impairment. If improperly treated, joint inflammation can lead to joint damage. This occurs through two main mechanisms: due to severe thickening of the synovial membrane (with the formation of a so-called synovial pannus) and the release of various substances that provoke the loss of cartilage and bone tissue by the joint. X-ray examination reveals holes in the bone in this case. This is called bone erosion. Prolonged maintenance of the antalgic position causes muscle atrophy, tension or contraction of muscles and soft tissues, leading to flexion impairment.
2. Different Types of JIA (JA)
2.1. Are there different forms of the disease?
There are several forms of JIA. They differ mainly in the number of affected joints (oligoarticular or polyarticular JIA), as well as the presence of additional symptoms such as fever, rash, and others (see following paragraphs). The diagnosis of different forms is carried out by observing symptoms during the first 6 months of the disease. Therefore, they are also often referred to as "onset forms."
2.1.1 Systemic JIA (sJIA)
"Systemic" means that in addition to the joints, arthritis can affect various internal organs. sJIA is characterized by fever, rash, and intense inflammation of various organs. These manifestations may appear before the development of arthritis or against the background of arthritis. There are prolonged periods of high fever and rash, which appears mainly during peak body temperature spikes. Other symptoms may include muscle pain, enlargement of the liver, spleen, or lymph nodes, and inflammation of the heart lining (pericarditis) or lungs (pleuritis). Arthritis, typically characterized by involvement of 5 or more joints, may occur at the onset of the disease or appear later. Boys and girls of various ages can be affected by this disease, but it is especially common in infants and preschoolers. Half of the patients have limited periods of elevated temperature and arthritis symptoms. Such patients generally have a more favorable long-term prognosis. In the other half of patients, fever tends to subside, while arthritis increases and is sometimes difficult to treat. In a smaller proportion of such patients, elevated temperature persists along with arthritis symptoms. sJIA accounts for less than 10% of all JIA cases. It is characteristic of childhood and is rarely observed in adults.
2.2 Does this disease differ in children compared to adults?
Systemic arthritis is characteristic of children, whereas it is rarely observed in adults.
3. Diagnosis and Treatment
What laboratory tests are required?
At the time of diagnosis, to more accurately determine the JIA subtype and to identify patients at risk of specific complications such as chronic iridocyclitis, laboratory tests are performed in combination with joint examinations and an examination by an ophthalmologist. The rheumatoid factor (RF) test is a laboratory assay that detects autoantibodies. A positive test result and the presence of high concentrations of RF indicate a JIA subtype.
Other tests are also performed. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in blood serum are determined to assess overall inflammation severity. However, the diagnosis and treatment prescription are based much more on clinical manifestations than on laboratory parameters. Depending on the treatment applied, patients may require periodic tests (such as complete blood count, liver function tests, urinalysis) to detect adverse reactions and determine the degree of potential drug toxicity, which may be asymptomatic. Joint inflammation is assessed primarily through clinical examination, sometimes using imaging methods such as ultrasound. Periodic X-ray examinations or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) make it possible to assess bone tissue status and bone growth, which may serve as the basis for treatment adjustments.
How can we treat this?
There is no specific therapy for JIA. The goal of treatment is to relieve pain, fatigue, and stiffness, prevent joint and bone destruction, minimize deformities, and improve joint mobility while preserving the child's growth and development. Over the past decade, significant progress has been made in the treatment of JIA using medications known as biologic agents. However, some children exhibit "treatment resistance." This means that despite treatment, disease activity does not decrease, and joint inflammation does not resolve. There are some general principles for treatment planning, but therapy must be individualized for each child. Parent involvement in treatment decisions is essential.
Treatment is generally based on medications that suppress systemic and/or articular inflammation, as well as rehabilitation procedures that help preserve joint function and prevent the development of deformities. Treatment is comprehensive and requires the cooperation of a team of specialists (pediatric rheumatologist, orthopedic trauma surgeon, physical therapist, ophthalmologist).
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (NSAIDs) (ATC code M01A)
NSAIDs have traditionally remained the mainstay of treatment for all forms of JIA and other childhood rheumatic diseases. They are agents for symptomatic anti-inflammatory and antipyretic (fever-reducing) treatment; "symptomatic" means that they are not capable of inducing disease remission, but merely relieve symptoms associated with inflammation. The most commonly used are diclofenac, nimesulide, meloxicam, naproxen, ibuprofen, and acetylsalicylic acid. NSAIDs are usually well tolerated by children: gastric discomfort, which is the most frequent side effect in adults, is less common in children. Sometimes one NSAID may be effective when another is insufficiently effective. Combining different NSAIDs is not indicated. The optimal effect on joint inflammation is observed a few weeks after the start of treatment.
Intra-articular glucocorticoid injections (ATC code H02AB)
Intra-articular injections are used when there is one or more joints with pronounced inflammation that significantly restricts normal joint movement and/or is accompanied by severe joint pain. Long-acting GCs are injected into the joint. In the Russian Federation, preference is given to betamethasone, a drug that acts for a long time (often for many months). Its absorption into the systemic circulation is minimal. This drug is used only as an adjunctive treatment for sJIA. It can be used multiple times to treat the same joint. An intra-articular injection can be performed under local anesthesia or general anesthesia (usually at a younger age), depending on the age of the child, the type of joint, and the number of joints being injected. As a rule, it is recommended to perform no more than 3–4 injections per year into the same joint.
Second-line drugs
Second-line drugs are indicated for children whose polyarthritis progresses despite adequate treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (NSAIDs) (ATC code M01A) and glucocorticoid injections (ATC code H02AB). Second-line drugs are mainly added to prior NSAID therapy, which is usually continued. The full effect of most second-line drugs becomes apparent only after several weeks or months of treatment.
#Methotrexate**(ATC code L04AX03)
Undoubtedly, among second-line drugs used to treat children with JIA, #methotrexate**(ATC code L04AX03) is preferred worldwide. Several studies have proven its efficacy and evaluated its safety profile over several years of use. The maximum effective dose is currently defined in medical literature as 15 mg/m² of body surface area. It is administered either orally or parenterally (usually by subcutaneous injection). In sJIA, #methotrexate**(ATC code L04AX03) is insufficiently effective against systemic manifestations. #Methotrexate**(ATC code L04AX03) is used in children with active arthritis in combination with other drugs, including biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (ATC code L01XC, L04AA). #Methotrexate**(ATC code L04AX03) is generally well tolerated by children. The most common adverse events are gastrointestinal intolerance and elevated blood liver transaminases. Because the drug has potential toxicity, laboratory parameters must be monitored periodically during treatment. Methotrexate is currently registered for the treatment of JIA in many countries worldwide. Combination therapy of #methotrexate**(ATC code L04AX03) with folic acid—a vitamin that reduces the risk of side effects, especially regarding liver function—is also recommended.
Glucocorticoids (ATC code: H02AB)
Glucocorticoids (ATC code H02AB) are the most effective available anti-inflammatory drugs, but their use is limited by the fact that their long-term administration is accompanied by a number of serious adverse events, including osteoporosis and growth retardation. Nevertheless, the advantage of glucocorticoids (ATC code H02AB) is that they can be used to treat systemic symptoms that do not respond to other treatments, in life-threatening systemic complications, and as "bridge" therapy during the acute period of the disease and while waiting for second-line drugs to take effect.
Genetically engineered biologic drugs (GEBDs) (ATC codes L01XC, L04AA)
Over the past few years, new perspectives have opened up for the use of drugs known as biological agents. Physicians use this term to refer to bioengineered medications whose action, unlike #methotrexate**(ATC code L04AX03) or other immunosuppressants (ATC code L04A), is directed primarily against specific molecules (tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukin-1, interleukin-6, or T-lymphocyte-stimulating molecules). Biological agents have been shown to be powerful tools for blocking the inflammatory process characteristic of JIA. A variety of biological drugs are currently available, and almost all of them are approved for use in JIA (see pediatric legislation below).
Interleukin-1 (canakinumab) and interleukin-6 (tocilizumab) inhibitors
These drugs are particularly good for treating sJIA. Treatment of sJIA typically begins with GCs. Despite their efficacy, GC treatment is accompanied by side effects, among which the impact on growth stands out. Therefore, if GCs fail to reduce disease activity within a short period (usually a few months), physicians add interleukin-1 inhibitors (blockers) (anakinra or canakinumab) or interleukin-6 inhibitors (tocilizumab) to treat both systemic manifestations (fever) and arthritis. In the Russian Federation, tocilizumab and canakinumab are currently registered for the treatment of sJIA starting from the age of 2 years. In children with sJIA, extra-articular manifestations extremely rarely resolve spontaneously; much more frequently, they resolve with tocilizumab or canakinumab treatment, while arthritis persists. In these cases, methotrexate can be used alone or in combination with TNF-alpha inhibitors.
TNF-alpha inhibitors
TNF-alpha inhibitors are drugs that selectively block TNF, an important mediator of the inflammatory process. They are used alone or in combination with methotrexate and are effective in the majority of patients with active arthritis. Their effect is achieved quite rapidly, and they have now been shown to have a good safety profile, at least over several years of treatment. However, longer-term follow-up is necessary to establish potential long-term side effects. TNF blockers are the most widely used biologics for JIA. There are several types of TNF blockers, which differ significantly in their route and frequency of administration. For example, etanercept is administered subcutaneously once or twice a week, adalimumab subcutaneously every 2 weeks, and infliximab once a month as an intravenous infusion. Other drugs in this class are still undergoing clinical trials (e.g., golimumab and certolizumab pegol) for use in children. There are also drugs undergoing clinical trials in adult populations that may become available for children in the future. In sJIA, TNF-alpha inhibitors have limited indications. sJIA with active extra-articular manifestations is generally treated with other biologics, such as an IL-1 blocker (canakinumab) or an IL-6 blocker (tocilizumab). TNF blockers are used alone or in combination with methotrexate. Like other second-line drugs, they must be used under strict medical supervision.
Other Complementary Treatments
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation is an important component of treatment. It includes appropriate exercises and, when indicated, the use of splints to hold joints in a comfortable position to prevent pain, stiffness, muscle contractures, and joint deformities. Rehabilitation should begin early and be performed routinely to improve or maintain joint and muscle function.
Orthopedic surgery
The main indications for orthopedic surgery are the need for joint arthroplasty (mainly hip or knee arthroplasty in case of joint destruction) and surgical soft tissue release for persistent contractures.
What about alternative medicine / complementary therapies?
There are many complementary and alternative therapies available, and this can be confusing for patients and their families. Think very carefully about the risks and benefits of using such treatments, as their efficacy is not proven and they can be costly both in terms of time, burden on the child, and financial expense. If you wish to explore complementary and alternative treatment options, please discuss these choices with your pediatric rheumatologist. Some treatments can interact with conventional medications. Most doctors will not object to alternative therapies provided you follow the physician's recommendations. It is extremely important not to stop taking prescribed medications. When drugs such as GCs are necessary to keep the disease under control, stopping them can be very dangerous if the disease is still in its active phase. Please discuss any concerns you have about a prescribed medication with your child's doctor.
When should treatment be started?
Currently, there are international and national recommendations to help doctors and families choose treatment. International recommendations have recently been published by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR, see www.rheumatology.org), and another set of recommendations is currently in preparation by the Paediatric Rheumatology European Society (PRES, see www.pres.org.uk).
What is the current legislation regarding the use of approved and off-label emerging potential treatments for children?
15 years ago, all drugs used to treat JIA and many other childhood diseases were not properly studied for use in children. This means that doctors prescribed medications based on personal experience or on studies conducted with adult patients. Indeed, in the past, conducting clinical trials in pediatric rheumatology was difficult, mainly due to the lack of funding for research involving children and insufficient interest from pharmaceutical companies given that the pediatric market is small and research costs do not pay off. The situation changed dramatically several years ago. This was due to the adoption in the USA of the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act and specific legislation for the development of medicines for children (the Paediatric Regulation) in the European Union (EU). These initiatives essentially force pharmaceutical companies to conduct drug research in children as well. The US and EU initiatives, along with the presence of 2 major networks: the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO – www.printo.it), which unites more than 50 countries worldwide, and the Pediatric Rheumatology Collaborative Study Group (PRCSG – www.prcsg.org), based in North America, have had a very positive impact on the development of pediatric rheumatology, in particular on the development of new treatments for children with JIA. The Russian Federation is an active participant in almost all clinical trials of biological agents in children. Sometimes conducting research requires the use of a placebo (pills or infusions without the active substance) to make sure that the study drug brings more benefit than harm. Thanks to this important research, today several drugs have been approved, particularly for the treatment of JIA. This means that regulatory authorities such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and several national authorities have reviewed scientific information resulting from clinical trials and allowed pharmaceutical companies to state on the drug label that it is effective and safe for children. The list of drugs specifically approved for the treatment of JIA includes #methotrexate** (ATX code L04AX03), etanercept, adalimumab, abatacept, tocilizumab, and canakinumab. Currently, some other drugs are being investigated for children, so your doctor may suggest that your child participate in such studies. There are other drugs that are not formally approved for use in JIA, for example, some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs (ATX code M01A)), azathioprine, ciclosporin, anakinra, infliximab, golimumab, and certolizumab. These drugs can be used even without an approved indication (so-called off-label use), and your the doctor may suggest their use, especially if no other treatments are available.
What are the main side effects of treatment?
Drugs used in the treatment of JIA are generally well-tolerated. Gastric intolerance—the most common side effect of NSAIDs (ATC code M01A) (which is why they must be taken with food)—is noted in children less frequently than in adults. NSAIDs (ATC code M01A) may cause an elevation in certain liver enzymes in the blood, but this is a rare phenomenon during treatment, with the exception of aspirin. #Methotrexate** (ATC code L04AX03) is also well-tolerated. Gastrointestinal side effects such as nausea and vomiting are common. To monitor potential toxicity, it is important to check liver enzyme levels by performing routine blood tests. The most frequent laboratory abnormality is an increase in liver enzyme activity, which normalizes upon discontinuation or dose reduction of #methotrexate** (ATC code L04AX03). The use of folic acid helps reduce the incidence of hepatotoxicity. Hypersensitivity reactions to #methotrexate** (ATC code L04AX03) are rare. Long-term use of high-dose glucocorticoids (ATC code H02AB) is accompanied by several important side effects. These include growth retardation and osteoporosis. High doses of glucocorticoids (ATC code H02AB) cause a marked increase in appetite, which in turn can lead to obesity. Therefore, it is important to encourage children to eat foods that can satisfy their appetite without increasing calorie intake.
Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (ATC codes L01XC, L04AA) are generally well-tolerated, at least in the first years of treatment. Patients must be carefully monitored for the possible onset of infections or other adverse events. Nevertheless, it is important to understand that the experience with medications used to treat JIA is limited both quantitatively (only a few hundred children have participated in clinical trials) and temporally (biological agents have only been available since 2000). For these reasons, several JIA registries currently exist to monitor the treatment of children with biological agents at the national level (e.g., in Germany, the UK, the USA, etc.) and internationally (e.g., Pharmachild, a project run by the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation [PRINTO] and the Paediatric Rheumatology European Society [PRES]), with the goal of closely monitoring children with JIA and identifying potential long-term safety issues (years after drug administration). The Russian Federation also maintains a Registry of Children with Systemic JIA, aimed at monitoring the clinical features of the disease, the quality of medical care provided, and the efficacy and safety of antirheumatic drugs, including biological agents.
How long should treatment be continued?
Treatment should continue as long as the disease is active. The disease course is unpredictable; in most cases, spontaneous remission occurs in JIA after treatment lasting from several to many years. The course of JIA is often characterized by periodic remissions and flares that require major changes in treatment. The question of complete discontinuation of therapy is considered only after arthritis has shown no activity for a prolonged period (2 years or more). However, clear information regarding the possibility of disease relapse after medication cessation is lacking. Physicians generally continue to monitor children with JIA until they reach adulthood, even if the arthritis subsides.
What is the long-term prognosis of arthritis?
In sJIA, the prognosis varies. About half of the patients have minor signs of arthritis, and the disease is characterized mainly by periodic flares; the ultimate prognosis is often good, and the disease frequently transitions into a state of drug-induced remission. In the other half, the disease is characterized by persistent arthritis, while systemic symptoms tend to fade over the years; this group of patients may develop severe joint destruction. In a few patients within this group, systemic symptoms persist alongside joint involvement; these patients have the worst prognosis and may develop amyloidosis, a serious complication requiring immunosuppressive therapy. Advances in targeted biologic therapy using interleukin-6 blockers (tocilizumab) and interleukin-1 blockers (anakinra and canakinumab) are likely to significantly improve the long-term prognosis. Currently, reliable clinical and laboratory characteristics are not available for patients at an early stage of the disease, and physicians cannot predict which patients will have a more unfavorable prognosis. Such prognostic indicators would be of significant clinical interest as they would allow the identification of patients who need more aggressive treatment from the very beginning of the disease. A number of other laboratory markers are currently under study and are expected to help determine the optimal time to discontinue methotrexate or biologic therapy.
4. Daily Life
Can diet affect the course of the disease?
There is no evidence that diet can influence the disease. In general, the child should follow a balanced diet normal for their age. Patients taking GCs should avoid overeating, as these drugs increase appetite. In addition, foods high in calories and sodium should be avoided during GC treatment, even if the dose is low.
Can climate affect the course of the disease?
There is no evidence that climate can influence disease manifestations. Nevertheless, climate changes, especially intense sun exposure, acute respiratory, intestinal, and other infections that children frequently contract in hot climates, may trigger a disease flare. In cold weather, morning stiffness may last longer.
What can physical activity and exercise therapy achieve?
The goal of physical activity and therapeutic exercise is to ensure that the child can optimally participate in all daily activities and fulfill all necessary social roles. In addition, physical activity and therapeutic exercise can be used to motivate children toward an active, healthy lifestyle. A prerequisite for achieving these goals is healthy joints and muscles. Physical activity and therapeutic exercise can be used to improve joint mobility, stabilize joints, increase muscle flexibility, muscle strength, coordination, and endurance (vitality). These aspects of a healthy musculoskeletal system enable the child to successfully and safely participate in school and extracurricular activities, such as active recreation and sports. Treatment and a home exercise program can be useful for achieving the required level of strength and endurance.
Are sports allowed?
Recreational sports are an important aspect of a healthy child's daily life. One of the main goals of JIA treatment is to ensure that children can lead as normal a lifestyle as possible and consider themselves no different from their peers. It is preferable to choose sports where mechanical stress on the joints is absent or minimal, such as swimming or cycling.
Can the child regularly attend school?
It is critically important for the child to attend school regularly. Limited mobility can be a problem for school attendance; it can cause walking difficulties, rapid fatigue, pain, or stiffness. During the acute phase of the disease, home schooling is preferable. In remission, the child can attend school just like their healthy peers. Physical education and participation in sports activities are recommended taking into account mobility limitations caused by disease activity.
School for children is as important as work for adults—it is the place where a child learns how to become an independent, productive, and self-reliant person. Parents and teachers must do everything possible to encourage sick children to participate in school activities routinely so that they can be successful academically, capable of interacting with peers and adults, and be accepted and valued by their friends.
Are routine vaccinations allowed?
If the patient is receiving immunosuppressive therapy (glucocorticoids, methotrexate, biologic DMARDs), vaccination with live attenuated vaccines (such as rubella, measles, mumps, and BCG) is not recommended due to the potential risk of infection spread resulting from compromised immune defense. Vaccines that do not contain live microorganisms, but instead contain only pathogenic proteins, are administered according to an individualized schedule and strict indications following consultation with a rheumatologist.
Will the child have a normal adult life?
This is the primary goal of treatment, and in most cases, this is what happens. JIA therapy has indeed improved dramatically, and with new drugs, it will become even better in the future. Currently, the combined use of pharmacological treatment and rehabilitation makes it possible to prevent joint destruction in the majority of patients. Close attention should also be paid to the psychological impact of the disease on the child and their family. Chronic diseases, including JIA, take a heavy toll on the entire family, and naturally, the more serious the disease, the harder it is to cope with. It will be difficult for the child to manage their illness properly if the parents do not do so. Parents have a deep attachment to their child, and to preempt potential problems, they tend to overprotect them. A positive parental attitude—supporting the child and encouraging them to be as independent as possible despite the illness—will be an extremely valuable aid in overcoming disease-related challenges, enabling them to cope on an equal footing with their peers and develop into an independent, well-balanced individual. The pediatric rheumatology team should provide psychosocial support to patients when necessary. Family support groups and charitable organizations can also help families cope with the disease.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. Evaluation of Therapy Efficacy
Russian title: Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire
Original title (if available): Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ)
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Kuzmina, N. N., Nikishina, I. P., Shaykov, A. V., Ruperta, N., Shelepina, T. A., & Salugina, S. O. (2002). Russian adapted version of questionnaires for assessing the quality of life and health status of children with juvenile chronic arthritis. Scientific and Practical Rheumatology, (1), 40-44.
Type (underline): - questionnaire
Purpose: assessment of the degree of functional impairment
Content (template):
Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In this section, we want to obtain information on how your child's illness affects their ability to adapt to daily life. You may write any comments on the back of this page. When answering the questions, you should select the single answer that best reflects the child's physical abilities (average condition throughout the day) OVER THE PAST WEEK. CONSIDER ONLY THOSE PROBLEMS THAT ARE CAUSED BY THE DISEASE. If the child cannot perform any of the functions due to age, the term "Not applicable" is used. For example, if your child has difficulty performing certain functions or cannot perform them at all due to age, but this is not related to their illness, use the term "NOT applicable". | ||||||||||
Without difficulty | With some difficulty | With much difficulty | Unable to do | Not applicable | ||||||
1. DRESSING AND GROOMING | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Dress, including tying shoelaces and buttoning up? | | | | | | |||||
- Shampoo hair? | | | | | | |||||
- Take off socks? | | | | | | |||||
- Cut toenails? | | | | | | |||||
2. ARISING | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Stand up from a low armchair or the floor? | | | | | | |||||
- Get in and out of bed or get up from a crib? | | | | | | |||||
3. EATING | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Cut a piece of meat? | | | | | | |||||
- Lift a cup or glass to the mouth? | | | | | | |||||
- Open a new cereal box? | | | | | | |||||
4. WALKING | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Walk outdoors on flat ground? | | | | | | |||||
- Climb 5 steps? | | | | | | |||||
Indicate what DEVICES AND AIDS your child uses when performing the specified functions: | ||||||||||
- Cane | | - Dressing aids (button hook, zipper pull, long-handled shoehorn, etc.) | | |||||||
- Walker | | - Built-up or special pencil | | |||||||
- Crutches | | - Special or raised chair | | |||||||
- Wheelchair | | - Other (Please specify)________________________) | | |||||||
Indicate which daily activities of the child require additional assistance from others DUE TO THE ILLNESS: | ||||||||||
- Dressing and Grooming | | - Eating | | |||||||
- Arising | | - Walking | | |||||||
Without difficulty | With some difficulty | With much difficulty | Unable to do | Not applicable | ||||||
5. HYGIENE | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Wash and dry entire body? | | | | | | |||||
- Get in and out of the tub? | | | | | | |||||
- Sit down and get up from the toilet or potty? | | | | | | |||||
- Brush teeth? | | | | | | |||||
- Comb hair? | | | | | | |||||
6. REACH | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Reach and get down a heavy object from head level (large toy, books)? | | | | | | |||||
- Bend down and pick up clothing or a piece of paper from the floor? | | | | | | |||||
- Put on a sweater over the head? | | | | | | |||||
- Turn neck to look back? | | | | | | |||||
7. GRIPPING | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Write with a pen/pencil? | | | | | | |||||
- Open a car door? | | | | | | |||||
- Open a previously opened jar? | | | | | | |||||
- Open and close a water faucet? | | | | | | |||||
- Open a door after turning the doorknob? | | | | | | |||||
8. ACTIVITIES | ||||||||||
Are you able/Is your child able to: | ||||||||||
- Run errands outside the home, go shopping? | | | | | | |||||
- Get in and out of a car, a child car seat, a school bus? | | | | | | |||||
- Ride a bicycle? | | | | | | |||||
- Do household chores (wash dishes, take out the trash, vacuum, do yard work, make the bed and tidy the room)? | | | | | | |||||
- Run and play? | | | | | | |||||
Indicate the DEVICES required by the child when performing the following functions: | ||||||||||
- Raised toilet seat | | - Special bathroom grab bar | | |||||||
- Special bath seat | | - Long-handled devices to reach things? | | |||||||
- Can opener (if the jar is already open) | | - Long-handled bathing sponge/brush? | | |||||||
Indicate the daily activities in which the child NEEDS additional help from others DUE TO ILLNESS: | ||||||||||
- Hygiene | | - Gripping and opening objects | | |||||||
- Reaching for items | | - Running errands and housework | | |||||||
9. PAIN: In addition, we would like to clarify whether your child's illness is accompanied by pain or not? If "YES", rate the pain your child has experienced OVER THE PAST WEEK? Rate your child's pain by marking it on a special line | ||||||||||
No pain 0 100 Very severe pain | ||||||||||
FINAL ASSESSMENT: Taking into account all the negative aspects of the disease, give an overall assessment of your child's health status by marking it on the special line: Very good 0 ______________________________________________________________________ 100 Very poor | ||||||||||
1990 ã Original version Singh G et al. 1999 ã Cross-cultural adapted version Kuzmina N, Shaikov A et al for PRINTO
Key (interpretation):
The result is the calculated score (0-3):
0–0.13 – minimal functional impairment
0.14–0.63 – minimal to moderate functional impairment
0.64–1.6 – moderate functional impairment
>1.6 – severe functional disability
Notes: none
Appendix G2. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Russian title: Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Original title (if available): Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain)
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Hawker G.A., Mian S., Kendzerska T., French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63(Suppl 11): S240–52
Type (underline): rating scale
Purpose: assessment of the degree of functional impairment
Content (template), The patient's condition is assessed based on the patient's or parents' subjective assessment of the patient's status and disease activity, as well as the physician's assessment.
The following are performed:
a) global health assessment based on the patient's or parents' subjective evaluation using a 100 mm VAS in points.
A score of "0" corresponds to very good health, and "100" points to very poor health. The child or parent marks a point on the line corresponding to their perceived health state. The distance between the selected point and "0" is then measured using a ruler.
b) physician's global assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm VAS (scores), where "0" indicates no activity and "100" indicates the highest disease activity.
The physician marks a point on the line corresponding to their perceived health state. The distance between the selected point and "0" is then measured using a ruler.
Key (interpretation): The resulting score is measured in mm (points) from 0 to 100.
Notes: none
Appendix G3. American College of Rheumatology Disease Activity Criteria (ACR, 2011)
Russian title: American College of Rheumatology (ACR, 2011) criteria for clinical inactive disease
Original title (if applicable): Criteria for clinical inactive disease (CID)
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Wallace C. A. et al. American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria for defining clinical inactive disease in select categories of juvenile idiopathic arthritis //Arthritis care & research. – 2011. – Vol. 63. – No. 7. – P. 929-936.
Type (underline): - other
Purpose: assessment of disease activity
Content (template), key (interpretation):
Systemic juvenile arthritis with active systemic manifestations and varying degrees of joint activity:
Low activity (presence of all criteria):
– number of active joints ≤4;
– ESR or CRP within normal limits;
>– physician's global assessment of disease activity by VAS <4 out of 10 points;
– patient's or parent's global assessment of well-being by VAS <2 out of 10 points.
Moderate activity (does not meet the criteria for low or high activity):
– presence of >1 criterion of low activity and <3 criteria of high activity.
High activity (presence of ≥3 criteria):
– number of active joints >8;
– ESR or CRP exceeding the upper limit of normal by 2-fold;
>– physician's global assessment of disease activity by VAS ≥7 out of 10 points;
– patient's or parent's global assessment of well-being by VAS ≥5 out of 10 points.
Criteria for evaluating the efficacy of antirheumatic therapy in patients with sJIA
Therapy efficacy is evaluated according to the American College of Rheumatology pediatric criteria (ACRpedi) and the criteria for inactive disease/remission stage C. Wallace et al., 2011:
To evaluate the response using ACRpedi criteria, the following parameters are used:
number of joints with signs of active inflammation;
number of joints with limitation of motion;
ESR or serum CRP concentration;
physician's global assessment of disease activity (using a 100-mm VAS);
patient's or parent's assessment of overall well-being (using a VAS);
functional ability assessment using the CHAQ questionnaire.
ACRpedi 30, 50, and 70 improvement scores are defined as improvement of at least 30%, 50%, or 70%, respectively, in at least 3 of the 6 core set parameters, with no more than 1 parameter worsening by more than 30%.
Treatment failure is established if there is a lack of 30% improvement according to the ACR pediatric criteria within 3 months.
Criteria for inactive disease/remission stage (C. Wallace et al., 2011)
absence of active arthritis in any joint;
absence of fever, rash, serositis, splenomegaly, or generalized lymphadenopathy attributable to juvenile arthritis;
absence of active uveitis;
normal ESR and/or CRP levels;
absence of disease activity based on the physician's global assessment (VAS);
morning stiffness lasting less than 15 minutes.
To establish the absence of disease activity (inactive disease state), the patient must meet all of the listed criteria.
Pharmacologic clinical remission is established if the disease remains in an inactive state while on continuous drug therapy for 6 consecutive months.
Non-pharmacologic clinical remission is established if the disease remains in an inactive state for 12 consecutive months without antirheumatic drugs.
The "Remission duration" indicator is expressed in months elapsed since the onset of the inactive phase of the disease.
Notes: none
Appendix G4. Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 71 joints (JADAS71)
Russian title: Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score in 71 joints Original title (if applicable): Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS71)
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Consolaro A. et al. Development and validation of a composite disease activity score for juvenile idiopathic arthritis //Arthritis Care & Research: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology. – 2009. – Vol. 61. – No. 5. – P. 658-666.
Type (underline): - index
Purpose: assessment of disease activity
Content (template): number of joints with active arthritis;
physician's global assessment of disease activity using a 100 mm VAS; 0 = minimum activity, 10 cm = maximum activity, cm equated to points;
parent's/patient's global assessment of health status using a 100 mm VAS; 0 = very good health, 10 cm = very poor health, cm equated to points;
erythrocyte sedimentation rate. To construct the scale from 0 to 10, the formula was used: (ESR - 20)/10. A value of less than 20 mm/h is scored as 0, and greater than 120 mm/h is scored as 10.
Key (interpretation):
The final JADAS71 index is calculated as the sum of all components (0–101).
An index of JADAS71 <1 point corresponds to the stage of inactive disease.
Notes: none
Appendix G5. Schedule for monitoring sJIA therapy efficacy
№ | International Nonproprietary Name (INN) of the medicinal product | Timing of therapeutic efficacy monitoring¹ |
1 | Methotrexate | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
2 | Leflunomide | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
3 | Tocilizumab | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
4 | Canakinumab | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
5 | Rituximab | At 16–24 weeks from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
6 | Adalimumab | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
7 | Etanercept | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
8 | Golimumab | At 3 and 6 months from the start of treatment. Thereafter — every 6 months |
¹ - Therapy adjustment is carried out at any stage of treatment in case of its ineffectiveness and/or lack of safety.