List of Abbreviations
HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigens) II – human leukocyte antigens class II
Ig (Immunoglobulin) A — immunoglobulin class A
Terms and Definitions
Celiac disease (gluten enteropathy) is a multifactorial disorder, a digestive impairment caused by damage to the villi of the small intestine by certain foods containing specific proteins: gluten and related cereal proteins (avenin, hordein, etc.) in grains such as wheat, rye, and barley. It has a mixed autoimmune, allergic, and hereditary genesis, and is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner.
Gliadin is an alcohol-soluble glycoprotein derived from wheat, which is a component of gluten.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Dermatitis herpetiformis (dermatitis herpetiformis Duhring; Duhring's disease) — an inflammatory skin disease associated with gluten-sensitive enteropathy and characterized by polymorphic pruritic eruptions, a chronic relapsing course, and granular IgA deposition in the papillary dermis.
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Dermatitis herpetiformis, like gluten-sensitive enteropathy, is associated with the HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8 haplotypes [1, 2]. Approximately 5% of patients with celiac disease develop dermatitis herpetiformis [3, 4].
Potential mechanisms of dermatitis herpetiformis development in celiac disease:
Following the ingestion and digestion of gluten-containing food, gliadin is absorbed through the small intestinal mucosa.
Gliadin is deamidated by tissue transglutaminase in the small intestinal mucosa, forming covalent cross-links between gliadin and transglutaminase.
Deamidated gliadin peptides bind to HLA-DQ2 or HLA-DQ8 molecules on antigen-presenting cells, where they are recognized by T helper cells.
Subsequently, activated T cells produce pro-inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases, which stimulate mucosal damage and the production of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies by B cells.
Over time, epitope spreading may occur (the formation of an immune response against an endogenous antigen or multiple endogenous antigens due to their exposure during tissue damage) and contribute to the production of antibodies capable of binding to epidermal transglutaminase.
IgA antibodies against epidermal transglutaminase circulate in the bloodstream, eventually reaching the skin and binding to epidermal transglutaminase in the dermis.
The deposition of immune complexes in the dermis stimulates neutrophil chemotaxis and proteolytic cleavage down to the lamina lucida of the basement membrane, leading to blister formation [1].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
Dermatitis herpetiformis – a rare dermatosis, more common in residents of Northern Europe. According to epidemiological studies conducted in Northern Europe, the incidence in various countries ranges from 0.4 to 3.5 cases per 100,000 population per year, and the prevalence – from 1.2 to 75.3 cases per 100,000 population [5–11]. The disease usually begins at the age of 30–40 years, but can develop in childhood and old age [12]. Men are affected more often than women; the male-to-female incidence ratio varies from 1.1:1 to 1.9:1 [2].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
L13.0 Dermatitis herpetiformis.
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
There is no universally accepted classification.
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
Patients complain of intense pruritus and rashes.
The disease is characterized by a chronic relapsing course, alternating between relapses and periods of drug-induced or spontaneous complete remissions lasting from several weeks to several years. Spontaneous remissions are possible in 10–25% of patients.
The disease is characterized by polymorphism, grouping, and symmetry of the rashes. The rashes are localized predominantly on the extensor surfaces of the extremities, scalp, shoulders, knees, elbows, sacrum, and buttocks, and are accompanied by pruritus. The rash presents as macules, wheals, papules, and blisters of various sizes. The blisters are tense, with a firm roof, filled with clear or turbid, sometimes hemorrhagic contents, and develop on an erythematous, edematous base. The blisters rupture, forming erosions that rapidly epithelialize, leaving hyperpigmentation. Occasionally, skin lesions are localized. Oral mucosa involvement is rare. The general condition of patients is satisfactory.
The occasionally observed monomorphism of rashes allowed for the identification of several clinical forms [4]:
bullous;
herpes-like;
trichophitoid;
strophuloid.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Diagnostic criteria:
The diagnosis is established based on physical examination.
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
Complaints and medical history are described in the section "Clinical Presentation".
2.2 Physical Examination
Physical examination findings are described in the section "Clinical Presentation".
It is recommended that all patients with suspected dermatitis herpetiformis undergo a consultation with a dermatologist to clarify the diagnosis [33].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the dermatologist evaluates the localization and nature of skin lesions and, if present, mucosal lesions.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
It is recommended that patients with suspected dermatitis herpetiformis undergo a cytological examination of the blister fluid for eosinophils to clarify the diagnosis [12–14].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: a large number of eosinophilic leukocytes and neutrophil leukocytes are detected in the blister contents of patients.
It is recommended that patients with suspected dermatitis herpetiformis undergo a pathomorphological examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material using immunofluorescence methods, obtained from a freshly formed (present for no more than 24 hours) blister, to clarify the diagnosis and in difficult cases of differential diagnosis [4, 10, 12, 13, 14].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: histological examination allows for the detection of the subepidermal location of the blister containing fibrin, neutrophil and eosinophil leukocytes, and accumulations of neutrophil and eosinophil granulocytes in the tips of the dermal papillae [13–16].
Tissue fixation is performed in buffered 10% formalin. When taking a biopsy, it is desirable to capture a small vesicle entirely. If it is impossible to take an entire blister lesion, 1/3 of the obtained biopsy sample should account for the blister fragment and 2/3 for the skin/mucosal area adjacent to the blister [16].
It is recommended that patients with suspected dermatitis herpetiformis undergo a pathomorphological examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material using immunofluorescence methods, obtained from a clinically intact (apparently healthy) area of the patient's skin or approximately 1 cm away from the affected skin area, to clarify the diagnosis and in difficult cases of differential diagnosis [13–18].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: this allows for the detection of granular deposits of immunoglobulin A in the papillary dermis, which is characteristic of dermatitis herpetiformis. In contrast, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, which occurs in the absence of gluten-sensitive enteropathy, is characterized by linear IgA deposition in the basement membrane zone of the epidermis [13–15].
After collection, the material should be wrapped in a sterile gauze swab generously soaked in saline and delivered to the laboratory within 2 hours for freezing and sectioning on a cryostat microtome. Immunofluorescence examination of the patient's skin biopsy can be performed using either direct or indirect techniques.
It is recommended that patients with manifestations of dermatitis herpetiformis who lack the characteristic immunofluorescence pattern upon pathomorphological examination of skin biopsy material (using immunofluorescence methods) undergo the following to confirm the diagnosis and in case of differential diagnosis difficulties:
- determination of blood levels of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies [14, 18, 19, 20];
GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: in dermatitis herpetiformis, the blood level of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies is elevated.
- determination of blood levels of anti-endomysial antibodies [18];
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: in dermatitis herpetiformis, the blood level of anti-endomysial antibodies is elevated.
It is recommended that patients with dermatitis herpetiformis who are scheduled for or undergoing systemic therapy be monitored for safety via:
- complete blood count (CBC) [21–24];
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: during systemic therapy, patients may develop adverse events that can be detected through a complete blood count. Therapy with dapsone** may lead to agranulocytosis [21–23]. Patients receiving sulfasalazine** therapy may develop hypersensitivity reactions accompanied by eosinophilia [24].
- standard clinical blood chemistry panel [21–24];
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: during systemic therapy, patients may develop adverse events that can be detected through a blood chemistry panel. Therapy with dapsone** may cause hepatotoxicity [21–24]. Nephrotoxic and hepatotoxic effects of the drug may manifest during sulfasalazine** therapy [24].
- urinalysis [21–24].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: during systemic therapy, patients may develop adverse events that can be detected through urinalysis. Adverse events that may develop during dapsone** therapy include nephritis and renal failure [21–23]. Nephrotoxic effects may manifest during sulfasalazine** therapy [24].
It is recommended that patients with dermatitis herpetiformis presenting with symptoms indicative of associated intestinal pathology undergo laboratory testing for malabsorption markers:
- serum iron level test [4, 28];
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: if dermatitis herpetiformis is associated with intestinal pathology accompanied by malabsorption syndrome, patients exhibit decreased serum iron levels.
- vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) level test [4, 28];
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: if dermatitis herpetiformis is associated with intestinal pathology accompanied by malabsorption syndrome, patients exhibit decreased blood levels of vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin).
- serum folic acid test [4, 28].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: if dermatitis herpetiformis is associated with intestinal pathology accompanied by malabsorption syndrome, patients exhibit decreased serum folic acid levels.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
Not applicable.
2.5 Other Procedures
It is recommended that patients with dermatitis herpetiformis who have complaints related to intestinal involvement (abdominal pain, diarrhea) undergo a consultation with a gastroenterologist to rule out gluten-sensitive enteropathy and malabsorption syndrome [12, 29, 31].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: gluten-sensitive enteropathy is identified in 90% of patients, although its clinical manifestations occur in only 10% of patients [12, 29]. To detect malabsorption syndrome, tests for serum iron, blood vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin), and serum folic acid may be performed.
It is recommended that patients with dermatitis herpetiformis who require dietary correction have a consultation with a clinical dietitian for dietary adjustment excluding gluten-containing foods [18, 29, 31].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: adherence to a gluten-free diet promotes the regression of rashes in patients [12, 25, 29, 31].
It is recommended that patients with dermatitis herpetiformis who show signs of autoimmune thyroid diseases associated with dermatitis herpetiformis have a consultation with an endocrinologist for evaluation and treatment [18, 30, 32].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: association with autoimmune diseases, including thyroid disorders, is possible [18, 30, 32]. To detect associated autoimmune thyroid involvement, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and total serum thyroxine (T4) levels are assessed [18, 30, 32].
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
The mainstay of patient therapy is a gluten-free diet. Patients also receive systemic and topical therapy, with the goal of treatment being partial or complete regression of the rash. To reduce itch intensity, systemic antihistamines are prescribed to patients with Duhring's dermatitis herpetiformis. Systemic antihistamines can be used to control pruritus, alternating every 10 days if necessary.
3.1 Conservative Treatment
It is recommended that patients with dermatitis herpetiformis follow a gluten-free diet regardless of the presence of rashes to stop contact with the antigen that induces autoimmune reactions [16–18].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: a gluten-free diet leads to the resolution of skin lesions, elimination of enteropathy, and disappearance of IgA antibodies to gliadin, endomysium, and tissue transglutaminase.
It is recommended that patients with dermatitis herpetiformis receive therapy with systemic antileprotic sulfone drugs [16–18, 25, 26]:
- #dapsone**, adult patients, starting at 50 mg orally per day, with a dose increase up to 200 mg orally per day depending on the clinical presentation and treatment response (until a sustained effect is achieved on a gluten-free diet). Once control is achieved, the prescribed dose is 0.5–1 mg/kg of the patient's body weight for 1–2 years [16–18, 25, 26];
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: during therapy with #dapsone**, regular blood monitoring is required (complete blood count weekly, and after a few months, monthly). In case of a significant decrease in leukocyte count, platelet count, or bone marrow suppression, #dapsone** treatment should be discontinued. In the first 4 months of pregnancy and during lactation, the drug should be prescribed only in cases of absolute necessity with extreme caution. Since #dapsone** is excreted in breast milk, women taking the drug should refrain from breastfeeding.
- #dapsone** in pediatric patients orally at a dose of 1–2 mg/kg of body weight per day [38, 39];
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: #dapsone** may cause hemolytic anemia in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Therefore, before prescribing #dapsone**, to reduce the risk of hemolytic anemia, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in erythrocyte hemolysate may be determined. During #dapsone** therapy, anemia and agranulocytosis may develop, necessitating regular blood monitoring (complete blood count weekly, and after a few months, monthly). In case of a significant decrease in leukocyte count, platelet count, or bone marrow suppression, #dapsone** treatment should be discontinued.
or aminosalicylic acid derivatives and similar agents:
- #sulfasalazine** orally at a dose of 1–3 g per day [4, 16, 25, 26, 33, 36, 37].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: during treatment, blood alanine aminotransferase activity, blood aspartate aminotransferase activity, complete blood count (at the start of therapy: 1–2 times a month, then every 3–6 months of treatment), and urinalysis (in renal failure) are periodically performed, along with increased fluid intake. During pregnancy, prescribing the drug is possible only under strict indications and at the minimum effective dose.
It is recommended to use systemic antihistamines in patients with Duhring's dermatitis herpetiformis accompanied by pruritus to reduce the severity of itching [4, 33, 36, 37]:
- clemastine 1 mg orally 2 times a day for 7–10 days;
Comments: clemastine tablets are contraindicated in children under 6 years of age.
or
- #chloropyramine** orally for adults 1 tablet 3–4 times a day (75–100 mg per day), pediatric patients aged 3 to 6 years – 1/2 tablet (12.5 mg) 2 times a day (total daily dose – 25 mg); children aged 6 to 14 years – 1/2 tablet (12.5 mg) 2–3 times a day (total daily dose – 25–37.5 mg); aged 14 to 18 years: 1 tablet (25 mg) 3–4 times a day (total daily dose – 75–100 mg) [4, 33, 36, 37];
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: chloropyramine** tablets are contraindicated, depending on the drug manufacturer, in children under 3 years or under 14 years of age.
or
- loratadine** orally for adults and children over 12 years with a body weight of more than 30 kg, 10 mg once daily; children aged 3 to 12 years with a body weight of less than 30 kg, 5 mg (1/2 tablet) once daily (total daily dose – 5 mg) for 7–10 days [4, 33, 36, 37];
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: loratadine** is contraindicated in children under 3 years of age.
It is recommended to use dermatological corticosteroids for topical therapy in patients with dermatitis herpetiformis [4, 33, 35, 36, 37]:
- clobetasol 0.05% cream, 0.05% ointment applied in a thin layer to affected skin areas 1–2 times a day for 3–4 weeks [4, 33, 35, 36, 37];
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: a contraindication to prescribing clobetasol is the age under 1 year.
or
- betamethasone** 0.05% ointment to lesion sites 2 times a day [4, 33, 35, 36, 37].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: a contraindication to prescribing betamethasone** 0.05% ointment is the age under 1 year.
Dermatological corticosteroids can be used for severe pruritus to reduce it. When a secondary infection occurs, topical corticosteroids combined with antibiotics or corticosteroids combined with antiseptics can be used for topical therapy [16, 18, 35].
It is recommended to treat blisters and erosions with antiseptics and disinfectants [40, 43]:
- Boric acid + resorcinol + phenol + fuchsin solution for topical application 2–3 times a day for 5–14 days [40];
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: should not be used by women during pregnancy and breastfeeding period.
or
- brilliant green 1% solution for topical application [alcoholic] is applied directly to the damaged surface, capturing the surrounding healthy tissue 2–3 times a day for 5–14 days.
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: blister and erosion areas are treated with aniline dye solutions; in the presence of secondary infection, low-potency corticosteroids combined with antibiotics or moderate-potency corticosteroids combined with antibiotics in the form of a topical aerosol are used.
3.2 Other Treatment
Not applicable.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
Not applicable.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
Primary prevention has not been developed.
It is recommended that all patients with dermatitis herpetiformis follow a gluten-free diet as secondary prevention to prevent worsening of the disease course or recurrence [16, 17].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: a gluten-free diet prevents the development of relapses. Out of 38 patients who followed a gluten-free diet for an average of 8 years and then stopped, relapse developed within an average of 2 months in 31 patients [25].
It is recommended that patients with dermatitis herpetiformis undergo patient status monitoring to assess adherence to therapy and diet, as well as due to the potential for exacerbations of celiac disease and the development of autoimmune diseases associated with dermatitis herpetiformis, including thyroid disorders. This monitoring consists of consultations with a general practitioner / pediatrician and a nutritionist 6 months after the establishment of the diagnosis, and thereafter once a year [16].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: during patient therapy, regular evaluation of the efficacy and safety of ongoing systemic therapy is necessary.
6. Organization of Medical Care
Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization:
1) lack of response to treatment administered in an outpatient setting;
2) appearance of new rashes;
3) presence of secondary infection in the lesion foci.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:
1) stabilization of the process (absence of new rashes);
2) epithelialization of 70% of erosions;
3) disappearance of pruritus.
7. Additional Information
In cases of strict adherence to a gluten-free diet, the prognosis for patients with dermatitis herpetiformis is favorable [35]. Provided that a gluten-free diet is followed, 47% of patients with dermatitis herpetiformis were able to discontinue dapsone** therapy, 38% managed to reduce their daily dose of dapsone** by 50% or more, and only 15% of patients could not reduce the dose of dapsone** [41]. It has been found that the quality of life of patients with dermatitis herpetiformis who adhere to a gluten-free diet long-term is comparable to that of the general population [42].
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria | Performance evaluation |
|---|---|---|
1. | A complete blood count (CBC) with differential was performed. | yes/no |
2. | General clinical blood chemistry analysis performed | yes/no |
3. | A general (clinical) urinalysis was performed | yes/no |
4. | The diagnosis was confirmed by pathomorphological examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material and/or pathomorphological examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material using immunofluorescence methods. | yes/no |
5. | Therapy with systemic antileprosy sulfone drugs, aminosalicylic acid derivatives, or similar medications was administered. | yes/no |
References
Show references
Bonciani D., Verdelli A., Bonciolini V. et al. Dermatitis herpetiformis: from the genetics to the development of skin lesions. Clin Dev Immunol. – 2012. – 2012, р. 239691;
Salmi T.T., Hervonen K., Kautiainen H. et al. Prevalence and incidence of dermatitis herpetiformis: a 40-year prospective study from Finland. Br J Dermatol. 2011; 165; 354–359.
Federal Statistical Observation Form No. 12 "Information on the number of diseases registered in patients living in the service area of a medical organization for 2014".
Herrero-González J.E. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2010; 101 (10): 820–826.
Reunala T., Lokki J. Dermatitis herpetiformis in Finland. Acta Derm Venereol. 1978; 58: 505–510.
Mobacken H., Kastrup W., Nilsson L.A. Incidence and prevalence of dermatitis herpetiformis in western Sweden. Acta Derm Venereol. 1984; 64; 400–404.
Christensen O.B., Hindsén M., Svensson A. Natural history of dermatitis herpetiformis in southern Sweden. Dermatologica. 1986; 173: 271–277.
Burrows D. The prevalence of dermatitis herpetiformis. Br J Dermatol. 1972; 86: 437.
Buckley D.B., English J., Molloy W. et al. Dermatitis herpetiformis: a review of 119 cases. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1983; 8: 477–487.
Gawkrodger D.J., Blackwell J.N., Gilmour H.M. et al. Dermatitis herpetiformis: diagnosis, diet and demography. Gut. 1984; 25: 151–157.
Moi H. Incidence and prevalence of dermatitis herpetiformis in a country in central Sweden, with comments on the course of the disease and IgA deposits as diagnostic criterion. Acta Derm Venereol. 1984; 64: 144–150.
Samtsov A.A., Belousova I.E. Bullous Dermatoses. Monograph /– St. Petersburg: Publishing and Printing Company "KOSTA" LLC, 2012. – 144 p.
Kubanov A.A., Znamenskaya L.F., Abramova T.V. Differential diagnosis of bullous dermatoses. Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii 2016; (6): 43–56.
Albanova V.I., Nefedova M.A. Autoimmune bullous dermatoses. Differential diagnosis. Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii 2017; (3): 10–20.
Beletskaya L.V., Makhneva N.V. Labeled Antibodies in Normal and Pathological Morphology (Atlas). – Moscow: MNPI, 2000, – 111 p.
Caproni M., Antiga E., Melani L. et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009; 23 (6) 633–638.
Antigo E., Caproni M. The diagnosis and treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis. Clin Cosm Investig Dermatol. 2015; 8: 257–265.
Bolotin D., Petronic-Rosic V. Dermatitis herpetiformis. Part II: diagnosis, management and prognosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011; 64: 1027–1034.
Dieterich W., Laag E., Bruckner-Tuderman L. et al. Antibodies to tissue transglutaminase as serologic markers in patients with dermatitis herpetiformis. J Invest Dermatol. 1999; 113: 133–136
Koop I., Ilchmann R., Izzi L. et al. Detection of autoantibodies against tissue transglutaminase in patients with celiac disease and dermatitis herpetiformis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000; 95: 2009–2014.
Wolverton S.E. Monitoring for adverse effects from systemic drugs used in dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992; 26 (5 Pt 1): 661–679.
Wolverton S.E., Remlinger K. Suggested guidelines for patient monitoring: hepatic and hematologic toxicity attributable to systemic dermatologic drugs. Dermatol Clin. 2007; 25 (2): 195–205.
Tangamornsuksan W., Lohitnavy M. Association between HLA-B*1301 and dapsone-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2018; 154 (4): 441–446.
Linares, V., Alonso, V., Domingo J.L. Oxidative stress as a mechanism underlying sulfasalazine-induced toxicity. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2011; 10 (2): 253–263.
Bardella M.T., Fredella C., Trovato C. et al. Long-term remission in patients with dermatitis herpetiformis on a normal diet. Br J Dermatol. 2003; 149 (5): 968–971.
Cardones A.R., Hall R.P. Management of dermatitis herpetiformis. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am. 2012; 32 (2): 275–281.
Herrero-González J.E. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of dermatitis herpetiformis. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2010; 101:820–826.
Fry L., Keir P., McMinn R.M., et al. Small intestinal structure and function and haematological changes in dermatitis herpetiformis. Lancet. 1967; 2: 29–33.
Jami L. Miller, Shehnaz Aysha K. Zaman. Dermatitis herpetiformis treatment & management [Medscape 06.03.2020 https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1062640-treatment#d8
Ching C.L., Jones M.K., Kingham J.G. Celiac disease and autoimmune thyroid disease. Clin Med Res. 2007; 5: 184–192.
Huma A. Mirza, Amani Gharbi, Beenish S. Bhutta. Dermatitis herpetiformis. [Updated 2020 May 12]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493163/
Collin P., Kaukinen K., Välimäki M., Salmi J. Endocrinological disorders and celiac disease. Endocr Rev. 2002; 23 (4): 464–483.
Skin and Venereal Diseases: A Guide for Physicians. In two volumes. – 2nd ed., rev. and supp. – Vol. 2 / Ed. by Yu.K. Skripkin and V.N. Mordovtsev. – M.: Meditsina, 1999. – 880 p.: ill.: [1] l. ill. ISBN 5-225-02761-X (p. 243).
T T Salmi Dermatitis herpetiformis 2019 British Association of Dermatologists.
Nguyen CN, Kim SJ. Dermatitis herpetiformis: An update on diagnosis, disease monitoring, and management. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Aug 20;57(8):843.
Clarindo M.V., Possebon A.T., Soligo E.M. et al. Dermatitis herpetiformis: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and treatment. An Bras Dermatol. 2014; 89 (6): 865–875; quiz 876-7. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142966
Ingen-Housz-Oro S., Joly P., Bernard P. et al. Recommandations des centres de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes pour le diagnostic et la prise en charge de la dermatite herpétiforme [Dermatitis herpetiformis. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment. Centres de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes. Société Française de Dermatologie]. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2011; 138 (3): 271–273.
Griss J., Stingl G., Schmidt E., Bangert C. A rare bullous variant of dermatitis herpetiformis. Br J Dermatol. 2016; 174 (1): 231–233.
Thibaud D., Jourdain J.C., Le Lorier B. et al. Dermatite herpétiforme du nourrisson révélée par des bulles hémorragiques au cours d'une diarrhée traînante [Herpetiform dermatitis of the infant forming hemorrhagic bullae in diarrhea]. Arch Pediatr. 2001; 8 (12): 1399–1400.
Romanenko I.M., Kulaga V.V., Afonin S.L. Treatment of Skin and Venereal Diseases: A Guide for Physicians: In 2 vols. – M.: Medical Information Agency LLC, 2006. – Vol. 2. – P. 620–623.
Collin P, Pukkala E, Reunala T. Malignancy and survival in dermatitis herpetiformis: a comparison with coeliac disease. Gut. 1996; 38 (4): 528–530.
Pasternack C., Kaukinen K., Kurppa K. et al. Quality of life and gastrointestinal symptoms in long-term treated dermatitis herpetiformis patients: A cross-sectional study in Finland. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015; 16 (6): 545–552.
Kulaga V.V., Lemeshko V.A. Skin and Venereal Diseases (for the Practicing Physician). – M: Kniga-plus, 2013. – P. 512.
Nguyen CN, Kim SJ. Dermatitis Herpetiformis: An Update on Diagnosis, Disease Monitoring, and Management. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Aug 20;57(8):843. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080843. PMID: 34441049; PMCID: PMC8400185.
Nevozinskaya Z.A., Denisova E.V., Sakania L.R. et al. Duhring's dermatitis herpetiformis: a guide for the practicing physician. Consilium Medicum. Dermatology (Suppl.). 2016; 1: 16–17
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Kubanov Alexey Alekseevich – Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists.
Makhneva Nataliya Vit ́evna – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists.
Znamenskaya Lyudmila Fedorovna – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists.
Karamova Arfenya Eduardovna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists.
Chikin Vadim Viktorovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists.
Nefedova Maria Andreevna – Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists.
Conflict of interest: the authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
Specialist physicians: dermatovenereologist, cosmetologist.
Residents and trainees of continuing professional education programs in the specified specialties.
Table 1. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Scale for grading levels of evidence (LoE) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definitions |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Scale for grading grades of recommendation (GoR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitation interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.
The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
These clinical guidelines were developed taking into account the following regulatory legal documents:
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 924n dated November 15, 2012, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to the Population in the Profile 'Dermatovenereology'."
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix C. Patient Information
To prevent exacerbations and relapses of the disease, dietary compliance is necessary. Wheat, barley, rye, oats, and other cereals must be completely eliminated from the diet. Foods containing iodine (seafood, feijoa, persimmon, etc.) must also be avoided.
A gluten-free diet leads to regression of rashes in 1–2 years; however, dermatitis herpetiformis invariably relapses within 12 weeks after the reintroduction of dietary gluten, which is why patients must adhere to the diet for life. Only 10–20% of patients develop immune tolerance and are able to resume a normal diet after several years of a strict gluten-free diet; this is most frequently observed in cases of disease onset in childhood and in patients treated with dapsone**.
Strict adherence to a gluten-free diet over a long period leads to a reduced need for medications, a lower risk of intestinal lymphomas, resolution of skin rashes, and improvement of enteropathy/malabsorption symptoms.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Special assessment scales, indices, and questionnaires are not used during patient examination.