List of Abbreviations
IL – interleukin
IFN – interferon
ICD – International Classification of Diseases
UVA-1 – ultra-long-wave ultraviolet therapy
NB-UVB – narrow-band ultraviolet B therapy
EASI – Eczema Area and Severity Index
IgE – immunoglobulin E
IGA – Investigator's Global Assessment
SCORAD – Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis
# - The use of a medicinal product for indications (characteristics) not specified in its instructions for use (off-label) is carried out by the decision of a medical commission, with the permission of the Local Ethics Committee of the medical organization (if any), subject to the signed informed voluntary consent of one of the parents or another legal representative in accordance with Federal Law No. 323-FZ dated November 21, 2011, "On the Basics of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation" (as amended by Federal Law No. 482-FZ dated December 30, 2021).
** - The drug is included in the list of vital and essential drugs (Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2406-r dated October 12, 2019, "On approval of the list of vital and essential drugs for medical use for 2020, the list of drugs for medical use, including drugs for medical use prescribed by decisions of medical commissions of medical organizations, the list of drugs intended to provide for persons with hemophilia, cystic fibrosis, pituitary nanism, Gaucher disease, malignant neoplasms of lymphoid, hematopoietic and related tissues, multiple sclerosis, hemolytic-uremic syndrome, systemic-onset juvenile arthritis, mucopolysaccharidosis types I, II and VI, persons after organ and/or tissue transplantation, and the minimum assortment of drugs required for the provision of medical care" (as amended on June 9, 2023).
Terms and Definitions
Atopic dermatitis is a multifactorial genetically determined inflammatory skin disease characterized by pruritus, a chronic relapsing course, and age-related features in the localization and morphology of lesions.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Atopic dermatitis is a multifactorial genetically determined inflammatory skin disease characterized by pruritus, a chronic relapsing course, and age-related features in the localization and morphology of lesions.
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Genetic factors in the development of atopic dermatitis include filaggrin gene mutations leading to impaired epidermal barrier function in atopic dermatitis, as well as a family history of allergic diseases [1].
The development of skin inflammation involving T-lymphocytes is associated with immune system defects. In the acute phase of the disease, a Th2 response predominates, characterized by the stimulation of Th2 cells followed by IgE hyperproduction; in the chronic phase, there is a switch from a Th2 to a Th1 immune response [2]. Key cytokines involved in the pathophysiological mechanisms of atopic dermatitis include IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-31, and IFN-γ, which require the JAK/STAT signaling pathway, including Janus kinase 1 (JAK-1), for signal transduction [3]. Many studies have described the pathogenetic role of IL-4 in the development of allergen-specific IgE-mediated reactions in atopic dermatitis, which consists in switching antibody synthesis to IgE. IL-4 binds not only to the IL-4 receptor but also to the IL-13 receptor; these cytokines share similar biological functions. IL-13 also plays an important role in the development of the Th2 type of immune response in atopic dermatitis [4].
The role of allergies to food allergens, house dust mites, plant pollen, Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins, molds, and IgE autoreactivity in the mechanisms of disease development has been proven [5, 305, 306].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
Atopic dermatitis is one of the most common diseases (accounting for 20% to 40% of skin diseases), occurring in all countries, in both sexes, and across various age groups. The prevalence of atopic dermatitis among the pediatric population is up to 20%, and among the adult population, it is 2–8% [6]. According to Federal Statistical Observation data, in 2022, the prevalence of atopic dermatitis was 384.7 cases per 100,000 of the total population (0.38%), and the incidence (newly diagnosed) was 157.1 cases per 100,000 of the total population. At the same time, the prevalence of atopic dermatitis among children aged 0 to 14 years in 2022 was 1,436.3 cases per 100,000 child population (1.4%), the incidence was 654.3 cases per 100,000 child population, and in the 15 to 17 age group, the prevalence of atopic dermatitis was 1,052.1 cases per 100,000 of the corresponding population (1.05%), and the incidence was 347.8 cases per 100,000 of the corresponding population [307]. The incidence of atopic dermatitis among children aged 15 to 17 in the Russian Federation was 1,047 cases per 100,000 of the corresponding population, and the prevalence was 329 cases per 100,000 of the corresponding population [7].
Atopic dermatitis may be associated with respiratory allergies, specifically allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma. According to various sources, the risk of developing respiratory allergies in patients with atopic dermatitis is 30–80%; 60% of patients with atopic dermatitis have a latent tendency to develop bronchial asthma, and 30–40% of patients develop bronchial asthma [8, 9]. According to a systematic review, bronchial asthma was diagnosed in 29.5% of children with atopic dermatitis aged 6 years or older [10]. Pollinosis was detected in 48.4% of patients with atopic dermatitis compared to 24.4% of individuals without atopic dermatitis, and bronchial asthma was diagnosed in 24.1% of patients with atopic dermatitis compared to 8.9% of individuals without atopic dermatitis [11].
The risk of developing an allergic reaction and bronchial asthma is significantly higher in children with food allergies and atopic dermatitis [12].
According to the "atopic march" concept, patients with atopic dermatitis and food allergies may sequentially develop other atopic diseases—allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma—over the course of their lives [13, 14]. The relationship between these diseases then depends on the severity of atopic dermatitis: symptoms of bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis may develop in 20% of children with moderate disease and 60% with severe disease [15]. It is hypothesized that there is a subset of patients with atopic dermatitis in whom bronchial obstruction develops as early as skin lesions, or even precedes them, and therefore bronchial asthma in this case cannot be considered the outcome of the "atopic march" [16, 17].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
L20 Atopic dermatitis
L20.0 Besnier's prurigo
L20.8 Other atopic dermatitis: eczema: flexural, infantile (acute) (chronic), endogenous (allergic); neurodermatitis: atopic (localized), (diffuse)
L20.9 Atopic dermatitis, unspecified
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
There is no universally accepted clinical classification.
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
In most cases, atopic dermatitis begins in early childhood (under 2 years of age). The disease is characterized by age-specific clinical manifestations and a chronic relapsing course with periodic exacerbations and remissions that may last for several years. The patient may have a history of other atopic diseases (allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma). A family history of allergic diseases (bronchial asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis) is typical. The disease is characterized by seasonality of exacerbations, with worsening in the cold season and improvement in the summer. Exacerbation of the process can also develop under the influence of a number of triggering factors (allergens, irritants, food products, emotional stress, etc.). Increased sweating can increase the intensity of pruritus.
Clinical manifestations of atopic dermatitis differ across different age periods. The main differences lie in the localization of lesions and the ratio of exudative and lichenoid components of the rashes.
The infantile stage of atopic dermatitis usually begins at 2–3 months of life. This period is dominated by the exudative form of the disease, in which inflammation is acute or subacute. Symmetrical erythematous, papulo-vesicular rashes are noted on the skin of the face and scalp, with exudation leading to crusting and scaling. Subsequently, the rashes spread to the skin of the outer legs, forearms, torso, and buttocks, and may also appear in natural skin folds. Dermographism is usually red or mixed. Subjectively, skin itching of varying intensity is observed. By the end of this period, lesions persist mainly in the antecubital and popliteal fossae, as well as the wrists and neck. Exacerbations of the disease are largely associated with dietary factors. The infantile period of atopic dermatitis typically ends by the second year of life with clinical recovery (in 60% of patients) or transitions into the next period (childhood).
The childhood stage of atopic dermatitis is characterized by rashes that are less exudative than in the infantile period, presenting as inflammatory miliary and/or lenticular papules, papulo-vesicles, and erythematous-squamous elements localized on the skin of the upper and lower extremities, wrists, forearms, antecubital and popliteal fossae, ankles, and feet. It is characterized by the presence of pruritic nodules, erosions, and excoriations, as well as minor erythema and infiltration in the areas of rashes on the torso, upper and lower extremities, and less frequently on the face. Dermographism becomes pink, white, or mixed. Eyelid pigmentation, dyschromia, and frequently angular cheilitis appear.
The adolescent and adult stage of atopic dermatitis is characterized by rashes predominantly on the flexural surfaces of the extremities (in the antecubital and popliteal fossae, flexural surfaces of the ankle and wrist joints), on the back of the neck, and in the retroauricular areas. The rashes present as erythema, papules, desquamation, infiltration, lichenification, multiple excoriations, and fissures. Areas of hypo- or hyperpigmentation remain in the lesion foci as rashes resolve. Over time, the skin clears of rashes in most patients, with only the popliteal and antecubital fossae remaining affected.
Palmar and plantar hyperlinearity, follicular hyperkeratosis ("horny" papules on the lateral surfaces of the shoulders, forearms, and elbows), cheilitis, nipple eczema, and folds on the anterior surface of the neck may occur. Periorbital skin hyperpigmentation and the appearance of a fold beneath the lower eyelid (Dennie-Morgan lines) are observed. Increased skin dryness is noted. Dermographism is persistent white or mixed. Itching is pronounced, constant, and less frequently paroxysmal. In adolescents and adults, the lichenoid form of the disease frequently predominates, characterized by dryness, pronounced skin markings, edema and infiltration of the skin, large confluent foci of skin lichenification, and persistent, stubborn itching. The pruriginous form of the disease is relatively rare, characterized by rashes in the form of multiple isolated dense edematous papules, upon the apex of which small vesicles may appear. Lesions may be widespread, with a preferential localization on the skin of the extremities.
The most severe manifestation of atopic dermatitis is erythroderma, which is characterized by universal skin involvement in the form of erythema, infiltration, lichenification, and desquamation, accompanied by symptoms of intoxication and thermoregulation disorders (hyperthermia, chills, lymphadenopathy).
Clinical and morphological forms of atopic dermatitis:
Exudative
Erythematous-squamous
Erythematous-squamous form with lichenification
Lichenoid
Pruriginous
Laboratory examination of patients with atopic dermatitis may reveal peripheral blood eosinophilia, as well as elevated levels of total and allergen-specific serum IgE.
Stages of the disease
The stage of exacerbation or pronounced clinical manifestations is characterized by the presence of erythema, papules, microvesicles, weeping, multiple excoriations, crusts, desquamation, and pruritus of varying intensity.
Stages of remission:
- incomplete remission is characterized by a significant decrease in disease symptoms with persistence of skin infiltration, lichenification, dryness and flaking, as well as hyper- or hypopigmentation in the lesions;
- complete remission is characterized by the absence of all clinical symptoms of the disease [18].
Extent of the Skin Process
In limited-localized process, the lesion area does not exceed 10% of the skin surface.
In widespread process, the lesion area ranges from 10% to 50% of the skin surface.
In diffuse process, the lesion area exceeds 50% of the skin surface.
Severity of Atopic Dermatitis
Mild course of the disease is characterized predominantly by limited-localized skin manifestations, mild pruritus, rare exacerbations (less than 1–2 times a year), with relapse duration of up to 1 month, predominantly in the cold season. The duration of remission is 8–10 months or more. A good response to ongoing therapy is noted.
In moderate course, a widespread character of the lesions is observed. The frequency of exacerbations is 3–4 times a year with an increase in their duration. The duration of remissions is 2–3 months. The process becomes persistent with a poor response to ongoing therapy.
In severe course of the disease, the skin process is widespread or diffuse in character with prolonged exacerbations, rare and short-lived remissions (frequency of exacerbations 5 times a year or more, duration of remission 1–1.5 months). Treatment yields short-term and insignificant improvement. Severe pruritus is noted, leading to sleep disturbance [18].
Complicated Forms of Atopic Dermatitis
The course of atopic dermatitis is often complicated by secondary infection (bacterial, mycotic, or viral). This feature, characteristic of patients with atopic dermatitis, reflects impaired anti-infective defense due to disturbed synthesis of antimicrobial peptides and epidermal barrier dysfunction.
1. The most frequent infectious complication of atopic dermatitis is the addition of a secondary bacterial infection. It presents as streptoderma and/or staphyloderma with characteristic skin manifestations against the background of atopic dermatitis exacerbation. Pyococcal complications manifest as various forms of pyoderma: ostiofolliculitis, folliculitis, vulgaris, less commonly streptococcal impetigo, and sometimes furuncles.
2. Various mycotic infections (dermatophytes, yeast-like, mold, and other types of fungi) also frequently complicate the course of atopic dermatitis, leading to more prolonged exacerbations, lack of improvement, or worsening of the condition. The disease acquires a persistent character. The presence of mycotic infection can alter the clinical picture of atopic dermatitis: lesions with clear scalloped, slightly elevated edges appear, angular cheilitis frequently relapses, and lesions of the retroauricular, inguinal folds, nail bed, and genitalia are noted.
3. Patients with atopic dermatitis, regardless of the acuity of the process, are prone to viral infections (most commonly herpes simplex virus, human papillomavirus, molluscum contagiosum virus). Herpetic superinfection can lead to a rare but severe complication — Kaposi's varicelliform eruption. The disease is characterized by widespread vesicular eruptions, severe pruritus, fever, and rapid addition of pyococcal infection. Involvement of the central nervous system, eyes, and development of sepsis are possible.
4. Benign lymphadenopathy is usually associated with exacerbations of atopic dermatitis and manifests as enlargement of lymph nodes in the cervical, axillary, inguinal, and femoral regions. The size of the nodes may vary; they are mobile, elastic in consistency, and painless. Benign lymphadenopathy resolves spontaneously with improvement of the condition or during ongoing treatment. A persistent, pronounced enlargement of lymph nodes despite a decrease in disease activity requires a diagnostic biopsy to rule out lymphoproliferative disease.
5. Complications of atopic dermatitis involving the eyes manifest as recurrent keratoconjunctivitis accompanied by itching. In severe cases, chronic conjunctivitis can progress to ectropion and cause persistent tearing. Keratoconus may develop. Early cataracts can also develop, usually associated with the frequent use of glucocorticoids used in dermatology in the periorbital area.
The development of neurological and psychiatric abnormalities – sleep disorders due to intense pruritus, social maladjustment caused by external defects, contribute to increased anxiety, the development of depression, and other psychiatric and neurological disorders, including suicidal ideation, is possible.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
It is recommended to use the diagnostic criteria of J.M. Hanifin and G. Rajka [19] for the diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in patients of all age groups.
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: To establish a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis, a combination of three major and at least three minor criteria is required.
The major and minor diagnostic criteria of J.M. Hanifin and G. Rajka are distinguished:
Major diagnostic criteria (3 or more):
Minor diagnostic criteria (3 or more):
pruritus;
typical morphology and localization of skin lesions: in infants and young children – redness and rashes on the face and extensor surfaces of the extremities; in older children and adults – lichenification and excoriations in the flexural folds of the extremities;
chronic relapsing course;
history of atopic diseases in the patient or their relatives.
dry skin (xerosis);
palmar («lined») and plantar hyperlinearity or follicular hyperkeratosis;
elevated serum levels of total and specific IgE;
early onset of the disease (under 2 years of age);
tendency toward cutaneous infections (S. aureus, H. simplex);
localization of the skin process on the hands and feet;
nipple eczema;
cheilitis;
recurrent conjunctivitis;
Denny-Morgan fold (an extra infraorbital fold);
keratoconus;
anterior subcapsular cataract;
periorbital skin hyperpigmentation;
facial pallor/erythema;
seborrheic eczema;
anterior neck folds;
itching associated with increased sweating;
exacerbation of the process and increased itching under the influence of triggering factors (wool clothing, soap, allergens, irritants, food products, emotional stress, etc.);
perifollicular accentuation;
food intolerance;
seasonality of exacerbations (worsening in the cold season and improvement in summer);
white dermographism.
Differential diagnosis of atopic dermatitis is carried out with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, chronic eczema, allergic and irritant contact dermatitis, seborrheic dermatitis, nummular eczema, scabies, psoriasis, ichthyosis, pityriasis rubra pilaris, dermatophytosis, immunodeficiency states (X-linked Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, hyper-IgE syndrome), etc.
In children, atopic dermatitis should be differentiated from all the above-mentioned diseases, as well as from diaper dermatitis.
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
Pruritus is a constant symptom of the disease across all age groups [20]. Pruritus is classified as a major diagnostic criterion for atopic dermatitis according to J.M. Hanifin and G. Rajka.
It is recommended to assess the nature of the disease course, the timing of disease onset, the presence of atopic diseases in both the patient and their relatives, the seasonality of exacerbations, factors provoking dermatitis exacerbations, and to pay attention to the patient's tendency to develop bacterial, viral, and fungal skin infections [20].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: The concordance of anamnestic data with the major and minor diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis according to J.M. Hanifin and G. Rajka is assessed.
2.2 Physical Examination
To establish a diagnosis, the primary step is a visual inspection of the patient's skin. The clinical manifestations of the disease are described in detail in the «Clinical Presentation» section.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
It is recommended that all patients undergo a complete blood count (CBC) with differential for the diagnosis of diseases and conditions that are contraindications to systemic therapy for atopic dermatitis and for monitoring the safety of ongoing systemic therapy with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, upadacitinib**, cyclosporine** [21, 22] (Appendix G3).
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Monitoring complete blood count parameters is necessary during therapy with cyclosporine**, as cyclosporine** can cause adverse events such as leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia [21] and other immunosuppressants or selective immunosuppressants [308, 309]. During treatment with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, upadacitinib**, the development of anemia, lymphopenia, and thrombocytopenia is possible [22].
It is recommended to perform a general clinical blood chemistry panel for patients to diagnose diseases and conditions that are contraindications to systemic therapy for atopic dermatitis and to monitor the safety of ongoing systemic therapy with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, upadacitinib**, cyclosporine** [21, 22] (Appendix G3).
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Monitoring blood chemistry parameters is necessary during therapy with cyclosporine**, since cyclosporine** may cause adverse events, including an increase in plasma creatinine and urea concentrations, hyperlipidemia, hyperuricemia, hyperkalemia, hypomagnesemia, and hyperglycemia. Cyclosporine** may also cause a dose-dependent, reversible increase in plasma bilirubin concentration and liver enzyme activity. Hepatotoxic effects of cyclosporine** with the development of cholestasis, jaundice, hepatitis, and liver failure are possible [21]. During treatment with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, upadacitinib**, an increase in blood cholesterol levels and elevated blood levels of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase may occur [22].
It is recommended to perform a urinalysis for patients to diagnose diseases and conditions that are contraindications to systemic therapy for atopic dermatitis and to monitor the safety of ongoing systemic therapy with cyclosporine** [21] (Appendix G3).
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Monitoring urinalysis parameters is necessary during therapy with cyclosporine**, since cyclosporine** can cause toxic kidney damage and, furthermore, possessing immunosuppressive activity, it may contribute to the development of infectious lesions of the kidneys and urinary tract [21].
It is recommended to test the blood level of total immunoglobulin E in cases where there is an insufficient number of diagnostic criteria to establish a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis [20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Elevated serum levels of total and specific IgE serve as a minor diagnostic criterion for atopic dermatitis [44, 45]. It is recommended to determine the blood levels of specific immunoglobulins E (testing the level of antibodies to plant, animal, and chemical antigens in the blood) during initial diagnosis and in the course of dynamic monitoring in order to identify sensitization and potential trigger factors (testing the level of antibodies to plant, animal, and chemical antigens in the blood), including when performing skin tests is not feasible.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
Not applicable.
2.5 Other Procedures
It is recommended to perform a pathomorphological examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material for differential diagnosis in cases where the patient exhibits clinical signs overlapping with other skin diseases [23].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: When diagnosing atopic dermatitis in adult patients, differential diagnosis with cutaneous T-cell lymphomas or other dermatoses is carried out. In atopic dermatitis, acanthosis of varying severity is observed, with elongation of epidermal rete ridges and their branching. Areas of parakeratosis and exocytosis may be detected. Perivascular or confluent lymphohistiocytic infiltrates are found in the dermis; in chronic courses, infiltration is minimal, and fibrosis predominates.
It is recommended to conduct an allergological workup in patients with atopic dermatitis who have a family and/or personal history of allergic diseases – food allergy, allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma – as well as those reporting exacerbation of the disease upon contact with allergens [24, 25].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: An allergological evaluation is necessary to confirm the allergic nature of atopic dermatitis, identify causative allergens in order to develop lifestyle and dietary recommendations, and determine the feasibility of allergen-specific immunotherapy. Allergological testing can be performed via skin testing with non-bacterial allergens (cutaneous allergen testing), determination of serum allergen-specific IgE antibody levels, and provocation tests. The choice of allergological testing method is determined by the availability and equipment of the allergy clinic and the presence/absence of contraindications to skin testing (acute exacerbation of the disease, need for systemic antihistamines).
It is recommended to perform cutaneous testing with domestic, pollens, epidermal, fungal, and food allergens to diagnose sensitization in patients with atopic dermatitis [26–30].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comments: The scope of the evaluation is determined by an allergist-immunologist. Skin tests are performed in an allergy clinic setting by a specially trained nurse and an allergist-immunologist. Prick tests or scarification tests are most commonly used. The results of allergen skin testing are correlated with the results of negative and positive control tests.
It is recommended to test the level of allergen-specific IgE antibodies to pollen, domestic, epidermal, fungal, and food allergens in patients with atopic dermatitis who have contraindications or other reasons preventing skin testing, doubtful skin testing results, or discrepancies between anamnestic data and skin testing results [28–33].
GRL ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: Determining serum allergen-specific IgE antibody levels is particularly important when skin test results are inconclusive or when they cannot be performed (e.g., during an exacerbation of an allergic disease or in the presence of other contraindications). The reliability of the result is affected by the test system used, which may have low sensitivity and specificity, resulting in both false-positive and false-negative outcomes. Component-resolved (molecular) diagnostics is used to map a patient's allergen sensitization at the molecular level using purified natural or recombinant allergenic molecules instead of allergen extracts. This method can be used in cases of discrepancies between anamnestic data, cutaneous allergen test results, and specific IgE antibody levels to allergen extracts, as well as in the presence of indications for food anaphylaxis, cross-reactive food allergy, and the inefficacy of AIT.
It is recommended to determine the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score (Appendix G1) [34] if additional quantitative assessment of atopic dermatitis severity is required.
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended to use the SCORAD index (Appendix G2) [6, 35, 36] if additional quantitative assessment of atopic dermatitis severity is required.
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: SCORAD is an integral score that includes the evaluation of six objective symptoms: erythema, edema/papules, crusts/oozing, excoriations, lichenification/scaling, skin dryness, and two subjective symptoms (intensity of pruritus and sleep disturbance). Mild atopic dermatitis corresponds to a SCORAD value <25; moderate severity corresponds to a SCORAD value between 25 and 50; severe atopic dermatitis corresponds to a SCORAD value >50.
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
3.1 Conservative Treatment
Patients with atopic dermatitis may receive topical or systemic therapy, as well as phototherapy (ultraviolet radiation). Moisturizing and emollient agents (emollients) are indicated for all patients with atopic dermatitis. Topical pharmacotherapy is administered for any severity—mild, moderate, or severe—of skin lesions in atopic dermatitis. Topical medications used in atopic dermatitis include glucocorticoids, other dermatitis drugs excluding glucocorticoids (pimecrolimus**, indicated for mild and moderate atopic dermatitis, and tacrolimus**, indicated for moderate and severe atopic dermatitis), and other dermatological agents (zinc pyrithione). For topical treatment in children, cream formulations and single-component topical agents are preferred: glucocorticoids, other dermatitis drugs excluding glucocorticoids (tacrolimus** and pimecrolimus**). Multi-component topical drugs—corticosteroids combined with antibiotics or corticosteroids combined with other agents—are indicated only when bacterial and/or fungal infection is clinically and/or laboratory confirmed. Inappropriate use of multi-component topical drugs may contribute to the development of additional sensitization to the components of the topical medicinal product in children.
Systemic therapy and phototherapy (ultraviolet radiation) are prescribed for moderate and severe atopic dermatitis. For systemic therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis, dermatitis drugs excluding glucocorticoids (abrocitinib and dupilumab**) and selective immunosuppressants (baricitinib** and upadacitinib**) may be used. Phototherapy (ultraviolet radiation) involves ultraviolet irradiation of the skin using various methods.
To reduce pruritus intensity, systemic antihistamines are prescribed to patients with atopic dermatitis. Oral formulations are preferred in children, in the absence of contraindications, to minimize painful medical procedures. Routine use of systemic antihistamines in children with atopic dermatitis should be avoided. There is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of this drug class for relieving pruritus in atopic dermatitis. However, they may be used if the antipruritic effect of topical glucocorticoids and/or other non-glucocorticoid dermatitis drugs is insufficient. If systemic antihistamines are necessary in pediatric patients, second-generation drugs should be preferred due to their superior safety profile compared to first-generation drugs.
3.1.1. Moisturizing and emollient agents
It is recommended for all patients with atopic dermatitis, regardless of severity: topical moisturizing and emollient agents (emollients) to maintain water-lipid balance, skin barrier functions, and prolong the remission period [37–47].
ORR BLOE 2Level of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Emollients can be used in the form of lotions, creams, ointments, cleansers, and bath products. The choice of product and its formulation is made individually, taking into account patient preferences, individual skin characteristics, season, and climatic conditions.
Patients with atopic dermatitis must constantly, frequently, and in large quantities use moisturizing and emollient agents (at least 3–4 times a day) both independently and immediately after water procedures [48–50]. An effective method for restoring the skin barrier in patients with atopic dermatitis is the use of emollients that compensate for filaggrin deficiency [310, 311].
The most pronounced effect of moisturizing and emollient products is observed with their regular use in the form of creams, ointments, bath oils, and soap substitutes. The choice of product and its formulation is made individually, taking into account patient preferences, individual skin characteristics, season, time of year, and climate. Ointment-based products (greasier) can be used in cold weather, while creams and gels with a high water content should be used in summer. Lotions have a higher water content that can evaporate, and therefore they should not be used in patients with pronounced xerosis.
To achieve a clinical effect, it is necessary to use a sufficient volume of emollient products (an adult with widespread skin lesions consumes up to 600 grams per week, a child consumes up to 250 grams per week) [38].
3.1.2 Topical therapy
For patients with mild, moderate, and severe atopic dermatitis, it is recommended to use topical therapy: corticosteroids used in dermatology, and/or other non-steroidal dermatological agents [6, 24].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: In mild atopic dermatitis, low-potency (Group I) and moderate-potency (Group II) corticosteroids used in dermatology are preferred. In moderate and severe atopic dermatitis, high-potency (Group III) and very high-potency (Group IV) corticosteroids are advisable, in the minimum effective doses (Appendix G3). To rapidly treat a flare-up of atopic dermatitis, topical agents and emollients under wet wrap dressings can be used. First, topical agents (corticosteroids and/or emollients) are applied to the affected skin areas, then a damp cotton or gauze cloth is applied, followed by a dry outer bandage [51–54]. Caution should be exercised when using moderate-potency (Group II) and high-potency (Group III) corticosteroids with wet wrap dressings due to the risk of adrenal suppression [54, 55]. The efficacy of topical therapy is assessed 2 weeks after initiating a new topical agent.
Corticosteroids used in dermatology
Corticosteroids for topical therapy are recommended in patients with atopic dermatitis:
clobetasol 0.05% topical cream, 0.05% topical ointment applied in a thin layer to affected skin areas 1–2 times a day for 3–4 weeks [56–59].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: A contraindication to prescribing clobetasol is age under 1 year. Very high-potency corticosteroids (Group IV) should not be used in children with atopic dermatitis. Clobetasol is recommended for short-term use; it should not be applied under occlusive dressings. Short repeated courses may be administered if necessary. Atrophic skin changes resulting from prolonged corticosteroid use may occur on the face more frequently than on other body parts [312]. When prescribing clobetasol cream and ointment to children, the drug should not be used for more than 5 days or applied under an occlusive dressing.
or
betamethasone** 0.05% topical ointment applied twice daily to the affected skin area in a thin layer with light rubbing for 2–4 weeks [60].
GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: A contraindication to prescribing betamethasone** 0.05% topical ointment is age under 1 year.
or
betamethasone** 0.05% topical cream applied once daily to patients with atopic dermatitis on the affected skin area in a thin layer twice daily with light rubbing for 2–4 weeks [61–63].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: A contraindication to prescribing betamethasone** 0.05% topical cream is age under 1 year.
or
triamcinolone 0.1% topical ointment is applied in a thin layer to affected skin areas 2–3 times a day for 2–4 weeks. An occlusive dressing may be used [64–66].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: A contraindication to prescribing #triamcinolone 0.1% topical ointment is age under 2 years.
or
fluticasone 0.05% topical cream, 0.005% topical ointment applied 1 or 2 times a day in a thin layer in an amount no greater than necessary to cover the entire affected area, and gently rubbed in for 2–4 weeks [67–69].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5Level of Clinical Effectiveness C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: A contraindication to prescribing fluticasone ointment and cream is age under 10 years.
or
mometasone** cream 0.1%, ointment 0.1% applied in a thin layer to affected skin areas once daily for 2–4 weeks [70–78].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5Level of Clinical Effectiveness C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: A contraindication to prescribing mometasone** cream 0.1%, ointment 0.1% is age under 2 years.
or
methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream, ointment, emulsion for topical use applied once daily in a thin layer to affected skin areas for 2–4 weeks [79–83].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: A contraindication to prescribing methylprednisolone aceponate 0.1% cream, ointment, emulsion for topical use is age under 4 months.
or
alclometasone cream 0.05%, ointment 0.05% applied to pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis on affected skin areas in an even layer 2–3 times a day for 2–4 weeks. In children and during the follow-up treatment period, the drug may be used once a day [84–88].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: A contraindication to prescribing alclometasone 0.05% cream and 0.05% topical ointment is age under 6 months.
or
#hydrocortisone** 0.1% topical cream, 0.1% topical ointment applied to affected skin areas in a thin layer no more than 1–3 times a day for 2–4 weeks [89–97].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Use of 0.1% #hydrocortisone** cream, ointment, and emulsion is possible from 6 months of age.
or
prednisolone** 0.5% topical ointment applied in a thin layer to affected skin areas 1–3 times a day [99].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: A contraindication to prescribing prednisolone** 0.5% topical ointment is age under 1 year. The duration of use should not exceed 14 days.
or
fluocinolone acetonide 0.025% ointment, 0.025% liniment for topical use in adults 2–4 times a day, up to 25 days; for children, use once a day for no more than 5 days. Course: no more than 2 weeks; when applied to the skin of the face — no more than 5 days [97].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Topical calcineurin inhibitor preparations
Are recommended for patients with atopic dermatitis: non-steroidal dermatological agents for topical therapy:
pimecrolimus** 1% topical cream applied twice daily to adults and children over 3 months of age with mild and moderate atopic dermatitis on the affected surface in a thin layer [100–109].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: Pimecrolimus** topical cream is indicated for both short-term and long-term treatment of mild and moderate atopic dermatitis in adults, adolescents, and children (from 3 months of age). Long-term intermittent use is possible (once a week or less frequently). Long-term use for up to 12 months with breaks is possible. A contraindication to prescribing pimecrolimus** is age under 3 months.
The drug is prescribed twice daily to affected skin areas on any parts of the body, including the head, face, neck, and intertriginous areas. It is particularly indicated for sensitive skin areas [109]. At the first signs of atopic dermatitis relapse, therapy should be resumed. If symptoms persist for 6 weeks, the patient's condition should be reassessed. It should not be prescribed to pregnant women (efficacy and safety studies have not been conducted).
Women during lactation should use with caution and should not apply to the mammary gland area. During the use of pimecrolimus**, exposure to sunlight, visits to solariums, PUVA therapy, and ultraviolet skin irradiation with UV-B or UV-A rays should be avoided.
or
tacrolimus** for patients with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis: adults — 0.03% topical ointment or 0.1% topical ointment; children over 2 years of age — 0.03% topical ointment applied twice daily in a thin layer to affected skin areas [94, 100, 110–127].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: The duration of treatment according to this regimen should not exceed three weeks. Thereafter, the frequency of application is reduced to once daily, and treatment is continued until complete regression of the lesions. If there is no positive dynamics within 14 days, a repeated medical consultation is required to clarify further therapeutic tactics. After 12 months of maintenance therapy (using tacrolimus** twice a week), the drug should be temporarily discontinued, and the need to continue maintenance therapy should then be considered.
The use of 0.1% tacrolimus** ointment is contraindicated in children under 16 years of age. A contraindication to prescribing 0.03% tacrolimus** ointment is age under 2 years.
During the use of tacrolimus**, exposure to sunlight, visits to solariums, ultraviolet skin irradiation with UV-B or UV-A rays, and PUVA therapy should be avoided. For 2 hours after application, emollients should not be used on skin areas where tacrolimus** ointment was applied.
Other dermatological agents are recommended for pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis for topical therapy:
zinc pyrithione 0.2% topical cream is applied in a thin layer to affected skin areas 2 times daily in children from 1 year of age; application under an occlusive dressing is possible;
zinc pyrithione 0.2% aerosol is sprayed from a distance of 15 cm 2–3 times daily in children from 1 year of age in cases of pronounced weeping [128–130].
Comments: The treatment course following this regimen for atopic dermatitis is 3–4 weeks.
GCR CLeE 4Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended if patients have pronounced infiltration in the lesions:
naphthalane oil liniment 10% is applied in a thin layer, without rubbing, to affected skin areas 2 times a day [131].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: The drug has anti-inflammatory, antipruritic, disinfectant, and healing effects.
3.1.3 Systemic therapy to reduce pruritus intensity
It is recommended to use systemic antihistamines in patients with atopic dermatitis to reduce pruritus intensity:
clemastine 1 mg, orally for adults and children over 12 years of age – 1 tablet (1 mg) in the morning and evening for 7–10 days. In difficult-to-treat cases, the daily dose may be up to 6 tablets (6 mg); for children aged 6–12 years – ½–1 tablet before breakfast and at bedtime [99, 132, 133].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Clemastine in tablet form is contraindicated under the age of 6 years.
or
chloropyramine** 25 mg orally for children aged 1 month to 12 months – 6.25 mg (¼ tablet) 2–3 times a day crushed into a powder form together with baby food; for children aged 1 year to 6 years – 8.3 mg (1/3 tablet) 2–3 times a day; for children aged 7 to 14 years – 12.5 mg (½ tablet) 2–3 times a day; for children over 14 years of age and adults – 1 tablet 3–4 times a day (75–100 mg per day) [134–138].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Chloropyramine** in tablet form is contraindicated under the age of 6 months or up to 14 years, depending on the drug manufacturer.
or
quifenadine 10 mg, 25 mg, 50 mg tablets for adults at 25–50 mg 2–4 times a day; for children aged 3 to 7 years – 10 mg orally 2 times a day, for children aged 7 to 12 years – 10–15 mg orally 2–3 times a day, for children over 12 years of age and adults – 1 tablet of 25 mg orally 2–3 times a day for 10–15 days [99, 139, 140].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Contraindications to prescribing quifenadine tablets include age under 3 years (for the 10 mg dosage) and age under 18 years (for the 50 mg dosage).
or
loratadine** syrup 1 mg/ml, tablets 10 mg, for children aged 2 to 12 years weighing less than 30 kg – 5 mg (5 ml) once daily orally; for body weight over 30 kg – 10 mg (10 ml) once daily; for children over 12 years of age and adults – 10 mg (10 ml) once daily orally for 14–28 days [141–143].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
or
cetirizine** #oral drops 10 mg/ml, tablets 10 mg – for children aged 6 to 12 months (strictly by prescription and under close medical supervision) – 2.5 mg (5 drops) orally once daily, for children aged 1 to 2 years – 2.5 mg (5 drops) orally 1–2 times daily, for children aged 2 to 6 years – 2.5 mg (5 drops) orally 2 times daily or 5 mg (10 drops) orally once daily, for children over 6 years of age and adults – 10 mg orally once daily for 14–28 days [144–148, 321, 326, 327].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Cetirizine** tablets are contraindicated under 6 years of age; cetirizine** oral drops are contraindicated under 6 months or 1 year of age depending on the manufacturer.
or
levocetirizine 5 mg – for children over 6 years of age and adults – 5 mg orally once daily for 14–28 days [149–153].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: A contraindication to prescribing levocetirizine is age under 6 years.
or
levocetirizine 5 mg tablets, oral drops 5 mg/ml – for children aged 2 to 6 years – 1.25 mg (5 drops) 2 times daily; total daily dose is 2.5 mg (10 drops), for children over 6 years of age and adults – 5 mg orally once daily for 14–28 days [296-301].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Contraindications to prescribing levocetirizine in tablet form include age under 6 years, and contraindications to prescribing levocetirizine in drop form include age under 2 years.
It is recommended for patients with severe pruritus [131]:
clemastine solution for injection 1 mg/ml intramuscularly or intravenously for adults 2 mg (2 ml) 2 times daily (morning and evening); for children – 0.025 mg per kg of body weight per day intramuscularly, divided into 2 injections; for 5–7 days [131].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Clemastine injection solution is contraindicated in children under 1 year of age. Oral dosage forms are preferred for children in the absence of contraindications to minimize painful medical procedures.
or
chloropyramine** solution for injection 20 mg/ml for children aged 1 month to 1 year at 5 mg (0.25 ml of solution) intramuscularly once daily; for children aged 1 year to 6 years – 10 mg (0.5 ml of solution) intramuscularly once daily; for children aged 6 to 14 years – 10–20 mg (0.5–1 ml of solution) intramuscularly once daily; for children over 14 years of age and adults – 20–40 mg (1–2 ml of solution) intramuscularly once daily for 5–7 days [131].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Chloropyramine** solution for injection is contraindicated in newborns. Oral dosage forms are preferred for children in the absence of contraindications to minimize painful medical procedures. If systemic antihistamines are needed in pediatric practice, second-generation drugs should be favored due to their better safety profile compared to first-generation drugs [301-302]. When using first-generation systemic antihistamines, the treatment course should be short (no more than 10 days) due to the high probability of adverse events [303].
3.1.4 Physiotherapy
Patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis may be prescribed ultraviolet skin irradiation [154–165]. Before prescribing phototherapy to patients with atopic dermatitis, a complex of laboratory tests should be performed to identify contraindications, including a general (clinical) blood count, urinalysis, general biochemical blood test, consultation with a general practitioner or pediatrician, endocrinologist, and obstetrician-gynecologist (for women). Examination by other specialists is recommended according to indications [166–171].
It is recommended to perform ultraviolet skin irradiation in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis:
narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy with a wavelength of 311 nm for adult patients with atopic dermatitis [154–156].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
or
narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy with a wavelength of 311 nm for children with atopic dermatitis [157, 158].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: Data on the use of phototherapy in childhood are limited; therefore, caution should be exercised. Narrowband UVB phototherapy is prescribed to children 5 years of age and older. When prescribing narrowband UVB phototherapy, the child's psycho-emotional characteristics, general condition, ability to stay in the cabin independently, and compliance with medical staff instructions must be taken into account.
or
long-wave ultraviolet A1 (UVA1) phototherapy (wavelength 340–400 nm) for adults [159–163].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Long-wave ultraviolet A1 phototherapy is contraindicated in children under 18 years of age.
or
selective phototherapy (broadband ultraviolet B phototherapy with a wavelength of 280–320 nm) for adult patients with atopic dermatitis [164].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: Data on the use of phototherapy in childhood are limited.
3.1.5 Systemic therapy for patients with atopic dermatitis
Are recommended non-glucocorticoid dermatitis drugs or selective immunosuppressants for systemic therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis:
abrocitinib film-coated tablets, 100 mg or 200 mg once daily orally for adults and children aged 12 years and older [172–177].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Abrocitinib should be taken at approximately the same time each day, regardless of meals. The drug can be used in combination with dermatitis medications, excluding topical glucocorticoids, or as monotherapy. In adults and adolescents (12–18 years of age) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, abrocitinib at a dose of 100 mg and 200 mg once daily as monotherapy or in combination with background topical drug therapy demonstrated a rapid reduction in the severity of objective signs of atopic dermatitis and pruritus. The proportion of patients achieving an IgA response at week 12 and/or week 16 of therapy among patients receiving abrocitinib at doses of 100 mg or 200 mg once daily was significantly higher than in the placebo group. A reduction in pruritus intensity of 4 points or more on a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 to 10 points was observed significantly more often in patients receiving abrocitinib 100 mg and 200 mg once daily compared to the placebo group, with differences becoming significant as early as 2 weeks of therapy and persisting at week 12 of treatment. If adequate therapeutic efficacy of abrocitinib treatment is not achieved after 24 weeks, discontinuation should be considered. During treatment with abrocitinib, therapy safety monitoring is required due to the potential development of lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, and increased blood cholesterol levels. Abrocitinib treatment may be interrupted if a complete blood count shows a decrease in lymphocyte or platelet counts [172–178]. Abrocitinib is contraindicated in children under 12 years of age.
or
baricitinib** film-coated tablets, 2 mg or 4 mg orally once daily for adult patients [179, 180]
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Baricitinib** can be taken at any time regardless of meals. Baricitinib** may be prescribed as monotherapy or in combination with topical corticosteroids. Concomitant use with topical corticosteroids may increase the efficacy of baricitinib. A dose of 2 mg once daily is suitable for patients aged 75 years and older, and may also be used in patients with a history of chronic or recurrent infection. Prescribing baricitinib** at a dose of 2 mg once daily should be considered in patients who have achieved sustained control of disease activity after using the drug at a dose of 4 mg once daily and in whom dose reduction can be recommended.
The efficacy of baricitinib** in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis is supported by clinical trial results [179, 180]. The severity of atopic dermatitis, assessed by the EASI score, decreased by 55–59% at week 16 of treatment with baricitinib** 4 mg orally once daily in patients not receiving topical therapy. If baricitinib** therapy at a dose of 4 mg orally was accompanied by topical glucocorticoid therapy used in dermatology, the severity of atopic dermatitis according to the EASI score decreased by an average of 67%. At week 16, the severity of atopic dermatitis according to EASI decreased by 75% or more (EASI75) in 48% of patients with atopic dermatitis treated with baricitinib** and dermatological glucocorticoids. A reduction in pruritus in patients was observed as early as the 2nd day of therapy, and by week 16 of therapy, pruritus decreased by an average of 51.2% [179]. Long-term study results indicate that if an initial treatment response is present, the effect is maintained during maintenance therapy.
During treatment with baricitinib**, adverse events may occur [181]. Therefore, safety monitoring of baricitinib** therapy is required. Patients receiving baricitinib** therapy may experience lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, increased blood cholesterol levels, and elevated blood alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase activities, which necessitates a complete blood count and general biochemical blood test. It is contraindicated to initiate therapy or baricitinib** should be temporarily discontinued if the blood neutrophil count drops below 1×109/L, the absolute lymphocyte count in the blood drops below 0.5×109/L, or the total blood hemoglobin level drops below 8 g/dL. Contraindications for prescribing baricitinib** include childhood under 18 years of age. If an elevation in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase activity is detected that raises suspicion of drug-induced liver injury, the use of baricitinib** should be temporarily discontinued until this diagnosis is ruled out.
or
dupilumab** 200 or 300 mg solution for subcutaneous injection – for pediatric patients aged 6 years and older. For patients with a body weight of 15 to < 30 kg: starting dose – 600 mg (two 300 mg injections), followed by 300 mg every 4 weeks; for patients with a body weight of 30 to < 60 kg: starting dose – 400 mg (two 200 mg injections), followed by 200 mg every 2 weeks; for patients with a body weight of 60 kg and more, the starting dose is 600 mg (two 300 mg injections), followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks [182–185].
GOR ALEL 2Level of recommendation validity A (level of evidence reliability – 2)
Comments: A contraindication to prescribing dupilumab** to patients with atopic dermatitis is childhood under 6 years of age.
or
dupilumab** 300 mg solution for subcutaneous injection at a starting dose for adult patients with atopic dermatitis of 600 mg (two 300 mg injections at different injection sites), followed by 300 mg every 2 weeks. Depending on the individual therapeutic response, the dose may be increased to 300 mg weekly [186–192]:
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: Dupilumab** may be used as monotherapy or concomitantly with dermatological drugs. The injection can be administered either by the patient themselves or by their caregiver. Prior to initiating dupilumab**, patients and/or their caregivers must be instructed on how to prepare and administer the drug injection in accordance with the instructions for medical use. Dupilumab** may also be used in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis combined with severe bronchial asthma.
The efficacy of dupilumab** in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis is confirmed by clinical trial results [189–191]. The severity of atopic dermatitis, assessed by the EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) score, decreased by 75% or more (EASI75) at week 16 with dupilumab** therapy administered as 1 injection every 2 weeks in 44–51% of patients not receiving topical therapy. If dupilumab** therapy administered as 1 injection every 2 weeks was accompanied by topical glucocorticoid therapy used in dermatology, the treatment efficacy was 10–20% higher than dupilumab** monotherapy, and at week 16 of treatment, the severity of atopic dermatitis according to EASI decreased by 75% or more (EASI75) in 69% of patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab** and dermatological glucocorticoids. A reduction in pruritus in patients was observed as early as the 2nd week of therapy, and by week 16 of therapy, pruritus decreased by an average of 53.9%. By week 52 of therapy, the effect was maintained, and a reduction in atopic dermatitis severity by 75% or more compared to baseline (EASI75) was observed in 65% of patients with atopic dermatitis treated with dupilumab** 1 injection every 2 weeks and topical glucocorticoid therapy used in dermatology [186–188].
or
upadacitinib** prolonged-release film-coated tablets, 15 mg once daily orally for children aged 12 years and older [193–195].]
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Upadacitinib** is contraindicated in children under 12 years of age.
or
upadacitinib** prolonged-release film-coated tablets, 15 mg or 30 mg once daily for adult patients as a single dose [193–200].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: The drug can be taken regardless of meals. The tablet should be swallowed whole without chewing, breaking, or crushing. Upadacitinib** can be used in combination with glucocorticoids used in dermatology, or as monotherapy. On sensitive skin areas (face, neck, genital skin, and intertriginous areas), dermatitis medications other than glucocorticoids (pimecrolimus**, tacrolimus**) may be applied during upadacitinib** therapy. In atopic dermatitis, upadacitinib** is contraindicated in children under 12 years of age.
It is recommended for severe atopic dermatitis in adults:
cyclosporine** at an initial dose of 2.5–3 mg/kg of body weight per day in 2 divided doses at 12-hour intervals. If necessary, the dose of the drug can be increased to a maximum of 5 mg/kg of body weight per day, depending on the individual condition of the patient. Once a positive result is achieved, the dose should be gradually reduced until complete withdrawal [201–206].
GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Contraindications for prescribing cyclosporine** include age under 18 years for all non-transplant indications, except for nephrotic syndrome.
The severity of atopic dermatitis decreases by 50% after 6–8 weeks of continuous treatment with cyclosporine**. Patients receiving a higher initial dose of the drug (4–5 mg/kg/day) achieve faster improvement—within 2 weeks (a 40% reduction in severity)—than patients receiving a lower initial dose (2.5–3 mg/kg/day; a 22% reduction in severity). However, after 6–8 weeks of cyclosporine** therapy, there was no difference in response between patients receiving higher and lower doses of the drug, while patients receiving the higher dose reported more side effects associated with cyclosporine** [206, 207]. The duration of continuous cyclosporine** therapy should ideally be limited to 2 years [208].
For patients with severe atopic dermatitis, systemic corticosteroids are recommended orally for the treatment of flares according to the following schedule—for the first 2–3 days [6, 209]:
methylprednisolone** 16–20 mg once daily after breakfast
or
prednisolone** 20–25 mg after breakfast and 5 mg after lunch.
Next, once daily after breakfast for the following 2–3 days:
methylprednisolone** 12 mg
or
prednisolone** 15 mg.
Next, once daily after breakfast for the following 2–3 days:
methylprednisolone** 8 mg
or
prednisolone** 10 mg once daily.
Next, once daily after breakfast with subsequent discontinuation of the drug:
methylprednisolone** 4 mg
or
prednisolone** 5 mg [99].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: If necessary, systemic corticosteroid therapy can be continued for another 2–3 days once daily after breakfast: methylprednisolone** 2 mg or prednisolone** 2.5 mg. Systemic corticosteroids in children with atopic dermatitis are not recommended for routine use, but may be used to relieve severe atopic dermatitis flares in short courses at a dose not exceeding 0.5 mg/kg/day #prednisolone** [313] or #methylprednisolone** 0.5 mg/kg/day for 1–2 weeks, for a maximum of 1 month [314, 315, 316, 317]. The risk of side effects limits the use of this group of drugs in children. Randomized controlled trials confirming the efficacy of this treatment method are currently lacking or have not been conducted, despite its long-term use in clinical practice [318]. There are currently no clear guidelines on monitoring the status of patients receiving systemic corticosteroids; necessary examinations and/or tests and corrective measures are prescribed on an individual basis depending on the duration of the course and clinical manifestations (e.g., skin atrophy, weight gain, sleep disturbances, mood changes, hyperglycemia, peptic ulcers/gastritis, osteoporosis, increased susceptibility to infections, etc.). Blood glucose monitoring and assessment of adrenal suppression (as determined by an endocrinologist/pediatric endocrinologist) may be considered during high-dose and/or long-term therapy [319].
3.1.6 Treatment of complicated atopic dermatitis
Atopic dermatitis is frequently complicated by bacterial skin infections that require antibacterial therapy [210, 211]. For localized forms of secondary infection, topical therapy with antibiotics and antimicrobial agents used in dermatology, and/or corticosteroids combined with antibiotics, or corticosteroids combined with other agents, and/or antiseptics and disinfectants, or other therapeutic agents is often sufficient.
In cases of widespread bacterial skin lesions developing in patients with atopic dermatitis, systemic antibacterial drugs must be used. Before prescribing systemic antibacterial drugs, a microbiological (culture) examination of purulent discharge for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms should be performed to identify the pathogen, along with a microbiological (culture) examination of rash elements for susceptibility to antibacterial and antifungal drugs. Pending the results of microbiological testing, treatment with systemic antibacterial drugs active against the most common pathogens, primarily S. aureus, is initiated in most cases. Combinations of penicillins, including beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations, first- or second-generation cephalosporins, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones (in adults), are highly effective. The duration of systemic antibacterial therapy is typically 7–10 days.
3.1.7 Topical therapy for complicated atopic dermatitis
Antibiotics and antimicrobial agents used in dermatology are recommended for topical therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis complicated by secondary infection:
fusidic acid, 2% topical cream or 2% topical ointment applied to infected lesions 3 times daily for 7–14 days [212–215].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: There are no age restrictions for the use of 2% fusidic acid cream and 2% ointment.
or
#bacitracin + neomycin topical powder 2–4 times daily, topical ointment 250 IU/g + 5000 IU/mg applied topically to infected lesions 2–3 times daily for 7 days [216, 217].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: There are no age restrictions for the use of bacitracin + neomycin powder and ointment.
or
mupirocin 2% topical ointment applied to infected lesions 2–3 times daily for no more than 10 days [218, 219].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: There are no age restrictions for the use of mupirocin ointment, except in elderly patients with conditions where absorption of large amounts of polyethylene glycol is possible, or in the presence of moderate to severe renal impairment.
or
erythromycin topical ointment (10,000 IU/g) applied topically to infected lesions 2–3 times daily for 7–14 days [220].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: There are no age restrictions for the use of erythromycin ointment.
or
silver sulfadiazine 2% topical cream applied to infected lesions 2–3 times daily for 7–14 days [220, 221].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: A contraindication for prescribing silver sulfadiazine cream is infancy under 2 months of age.
Corticosteroids combined with antibiotics or corticosteroids combined with other agents are recommended for patients with atopic dermatitis showing signs of secondary infection, administered in short courses (typically for 1 week):
hydrocortisone + oxytetracycline topical ointment, topical spray applied topically to infected lesions 2–4 times daily for 7–14 days [99].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: A contraindication for prescribing hydrocortisone + oxytetracycline spray is age under 18 years. A contraindication for prescribing hydrocortisone + oxytetracycline ointment is age under 2 years.
or
tetracycline + triamcinolone topical spray—irrigate infected lesions with a spray stream 2–4 times daily, holding the container upright at a distance of 15–20 cm from the skin, for 5–10 days [222, 223].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: A contraindication for prescribing tetracycline + triamcinolone spray is age under 3 years.
or
hydrocortisone + fusidic acid topical cream applied topically to infected lesions 3 times daily in adults and children aged 2 years and older for 14 days [224].
GCR BLeE 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: A contraindication for prescribing hydrocortisone + fusidic acid cream is age under 2 years.
or
Gentamicin + Dexpanthenol + Mometasone + Econazole topical cream applied to affected skin areas in a thin layer with gentle rubbing 2 times daily; treatment duration is usually 1–2 weeks, and use of the drug for more than 4 weeks is not recommended [225–227].
GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Treatment duration with Gentamicin + Dexpanthenol + Mometasone + Econazole cream is usually 1–2 weeks. The drug should not be used for more than 4 weeks. A contraindication for prescribing Gentamicin + Dexpanthenol + Mometasone + Econazole cream is age under 18 years.
or
betamethasone + fusidic acid cream for topical use for adult patients with atopic dermatitis topically on infected lesions 2 times a day for 7 days [228].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: A contraindication for prescribing betamethasone + fusidic acid cream is age under 1 year.
or
betamethasone + gentamicin + clotrimazole cream for topical use, ointment for topical use topically on infected lesions 2 times a day for adults and children aged 2 years and older for 7–14 days [99, 229–233].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
or
hydrocortisone + natamycin + neomycin ointment for topical use apply to infected lesions 2–4 times a day [234, 235].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: In children under 1 year of age, hydrocortisone + natamycin + neomycin ointment should be used with caution.
Recommended are antiseptics and disinfectants or other therapeutic agents (methylthioninium chloride) for patients with skin defects (fissures, excoriations) to eliminate secondary infection at the sites of excoriations and fissures [131, 220].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
boric acid + resorcinol + phenol + fuchsin topical solution is applied using a swab or glass rod to affected skin areas 2–4 times a day. After the liquid dries, ointments and pastes can be applied to the treated area [131, 220].
Comments: Boric acid + resorcinol + phenol + fuchsin preparation should not be used by women during pregnancy and breastfeeding
or
methylthioninium chloride 1% solution for local and topical use, [aqueous] for adults and children from birth; the solution is applied using a swab or glass rod to affected areas 2–3 times a day [131, 220].
Comments: The use of aqueous methylthioninium chloride solution is possible during pregnancy and breastfeeding.
3.1.8 Systemic antibacterial therapy
Recommended are systemic antibacterial drugs for patients with atopic dermatitis for the treatment of recurrent or widespread bacterial infection:
amoxicillin + clavulanic acid** for adults and children over 12 years (weighing 40 kg or more) film-coated tablets, 250 mg + 125 mg, 1 tablet 3 times a day or 875 mg + 125 mg, 1 tablet 2 times a day for 5–14 days or dispersible tablets for adults and children over 12 years (weighing 40 kg or more), 500/125 mg 3 times a day for 5–14 days, for children from 2 to 12 years or with body weight less than 40 kg, at doses of 125/31.25 mg or 250/62.5 mg [236].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: A contraindication for prescribing amoxicillin + clavulanic acid** film-coated tablets is age under 12 years. A contraindication for prescribing amoxicillin + clavulanic acid** dispersible tablets is age under 1 year.
or
cefuroxime** 250 mg orally 2 times a day for adults and children aged 3 years and older for 5–10 days [237–239].
Strong recommendation grade CLOE 2Level of Evidence C (Level of Evidence — 2)
Comments: A contraindication for prescribing cefuroxime** film-coated tablets is age under 3 years.
or
ceftriaxone** 1–2 g per day intramuscularly or intravenously for children over 12 years 1 time a day, for newborns up to 2 weeks – 20–50 mg/kg/day, for children from 3 weeks to 12 years – 20–80 mg/kg/day in 2 doses [238].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: Ceftriaxone** is contraindicated in premature infants up to 41 weeks of postmenstrual age inclusive. Ceftriaxone** should be prescribed with caution during breastfeeding.
Recommended are direct-acting antiviral drugs for patients with atopic dermatitis in case of Kaposi's varicelliform eruption [240, 241]:
acyclovir** 200 mg tablets for adults and children from 3 years old orally 5 times a day. The course of treatment is 5 days, but can be extended for severe infections.
Acyclovir** tablets 200-400 mg for adults and adolescents orally 5 times a day, IV: 5-10 mg/kg every 8 hours. The course of treatment is, on average, 7-14 days; for children IV: children aged 12 to 18 years and adults #5-10 mg/kg every 8 hours, from 3 months to 12 years: 20 mg/kg every 8 hours for 14 days, orally 20 mg/kg x 4 times a day (maximum dose 800 mg), up to 3 months 20 mg/kg [304].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
or
#Valacyclovir tablets 500 mg, orally for a course of 5-7 days. For adults: 2 tablets (1 g) 2 times a day or 1 tablet 500 mg 3 times a day, for children older than 3 months, oral tablets 20 mg/kg 2 times a day (maximum dose 1000 mg) [304].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: In case of a disseminated process accompanied by fever and severe intoxication symptoms, hospitalization in a hospital with a box ward is necessary. In a hospital setting, intravenous administration of acyclovir** should be carried out. Topical therapy consists of using antiseptics and disinfectants (boric acid + resorcinol + phenol + fuchsin, #methylthioninium chloride 1% solution for local and topical use, [aqueous] on lesions and surrounding skin 2–3 times a day, for 3–5 days, etc.) [325]
In case of eye involvement, 3% acyclovir** eye ointment should be used, placed into the lower conjunctival sac 5 times a day. Treatment is continued for at least 3 days after symptoms resolve.
A contraindication to prescribing oral acyclovir** tablets is age under 3 years.
For acyclovir** (for short and prolonged courses): monitoring of renal function is necessary (blood urea test, blood creatinine test, nephron function test by creatinine clearance (Rehberg's test) (creatinine clearance calculated using the Schwartz formula), electrolytes (blood sodium test, blood potassium test, total blood calcium test), complete blood count.
Recommended are calcium preparations for patients with atopic dermatitis when exudation develops in order to eliminate it [99]:
calcium gluconate** [99].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Calcium gluconate** is available as a solution for intravenous and intramuscular administration and as tablets. Calcium gluconate** 100 mg/ml solution for intravenous and intramuscular administration is administered intramuscularly or intravenously to adults at 5–10 ml of the 100 mg/ml solution daily, every other day, or every 2 days depending on the patient's condition. Intramuscular administration of calcium gluconate** 100 mg/ml solution for intravenous and intramuscular administration is contraindicated in children. The drug is administered to children only intravenously: in children under 6 months – 0.1–1 ml, 7–12 months – 1–1.5 ml every 2–3 days; over 1 year, depending on age, 2 to 5 ml of the 100 mg/ml solution is administered every 2–3 days.
Recommended are other therapeutic agents for patients with atopic dermatitis during an exacerbation [99, 242]:
#sodium thiosulfate** solution for intravenous administration 300 mg/ml [99, 242, 328, 329].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: #Sodium thiosulfate** is administered intravenously slowly. Adults are administered a single dose of 5-10 ml of the solution, children at a rate of 1-2 ml per 10 kg of body weight for 5 days. In childhood, the drug should be used with caution. The use of the drug is possible in combination therapy for exacerbation of the disease combined with topical therapy. When administered into the body, it exerts a detoxifying effect; #sodium thiosulfate** possesses antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties.
3.2. Other treatment
Recommended for patients with sensitization to house dust mite allergens and pollen allergens, contact with which causes exacerbation of atopic dermatitis and respiratory manifestations (allergic rhinitis, bronchial asthma), is allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) with preparations from the "Allergens" group to induce tolerance [6, 243–253]
GCR BLEL 1Level of recommendation grading B (level of evidence – 1)
Comments: Allergen-specific immunotherapy can be performed with indoor allergens/indoor allergoids and/or tree pollen allergens and/or grass pollen allergens/grass pollen allergoids in children older than 5 years and adults. There are subcutaneous and sublingual methods of AIT. Indications, choice of drug, method, and contraindications for allergen-specific immunotherapy are determined by an allergist-immunologist. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is prescribed only after relief of atopic dermatitis exacerbation with adequate therapy, as well as sanation of foci of chronic infection and treatment of concomitant diseases. It is performed by an allergist-immunologist in an allergology office or hospital setting. The duration and schedule of allergen-specific immunotherapy are determined individually.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
Patients with atopic dermatitis in remission may undergo comprehensive spa and resort treatment, the effectiveness of which is due to the combination of therapeutic effects of climatotherapy, balneotherapy, and pelotherapy. Referral of patients to balneological, mud-cure, or climatic resorts is possible [254–256]. Contraindications to balneotherapy and mud therapy include: all diseases in the acute stage or during an exacerbation of a chronic process, infectious diseases (tuberculosis, syphilis, etc.), pregnancy, bleeding and predisposition to it, malignant neoplasms, uterine fibroids, mastopathy, circulatory insufficiency above stage IIA, progressive angina pectoris and angina decubitus, cardiac asthma, and prognostically unfavorable heart rate and myocardial conduction disorders.
Recommended are therapeutic mineral baths for patients with atopic dermatitis in remission for the purpose of medical rehabilitation [257–262].
RCL BLEC 2Recommendation Credibility Level B (Level of Evidence Certainty – 2)
Recommended are therapeutic radon baths for patients with atopic dermatitis in remission for the purpose of medical rehabilitation [263].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Recommended are gas baths (oxygen, carbon dioxide, nitrogen) for patients with atopic dermatitis in remission for the purpose of medical rehabilitation [264].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Mud baths are recommended for patients with atopic dermatitis during remission for the purpose of medical rehabilitation [265].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Carried out using the application method at a temperature of 38–40 °C or 42–44 °C with an exposure time of 15–20 minutes.
Recommended is heliotherapy for patients with atopic dermatitis in remission for the purpose of medical rehabilitation [266].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Recommended is climate therapy for patients with atopic dermatitis in remission for the purpose of medical rehabilitation [266, 267].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Climate therapy helps improve skin condition and enhances the quality of life in patients with atopic dermatitis. Referral of patients to resorts with a moderately humid or highly humid marine climate, as well as a middle-mountain climate, is indicated.
It is recommended to consider the use of therapeutic medicinal baths (lipid-replenishing baths) for patients with atopic dermatitis as an additional treatment to maintain water-lipid balance, skin barrier functions, and prolong the period of remission [320]
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended when possible for patients with atopic dermatitis to consult a medical psychologist, especially in the presence of long-standing skin itching and pain, aiming to improve the psychological state of the patients and potentially provide mental modulation of these manifestations in addition to drug therapy [169].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: For patients with atopic dermatitis, in order to reduce the impact of stress on the frequency of exacerbations of the skin process, it is useful to conduct group psychotherapy, training in relaxation techniques and behavioral modification. Psychological interventions, including autogenic training or behavioral therapy, relaxation techniques, and meditation, can have a positive effect on the course of atopic dermatitis.
It is recommended to consider physical therapy using natural factors in sanatorium-resort conditions for patients with atopic dermatitis for health-improving, preventive, as well as therapeutic and rehabilitation purposes.
GOR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of trustworthiness – 5)
Comments: Patients with atopic dermatitis are recommended climatotherapy and thalassotherapy (complex treatment with marine climate and swimming) to reduce the impact of aeroallergens and pollutants on the body, as well as to stimulate natural climatic factors leading to the normalization and improvement of skin barrier properties, blood supply, perspiration, sleep, reduction of itching, and improvement of the course of other atopic diseases. Traditionally, hydrocarbonate-calcium-magnesium waters (including thermal waters) are used in the form of therapeutic baths (therapeutic mineral baths), along with climate therapy [45, 211, 340].
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
Recommended is dispensary follow-up for patients with moderate-to-severe and severe atopic dermatitis [320, 321, 323, 324].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Primary prevention of atopic dermatitis is aimed at preventing the occurrence and impact of risk factors for the development of the disease and includes a set of hypoallergenic measures:
It is recommended as primary prevention measures for atopic dermatitis in pregnant women with food allergies to eliminate the allergenic product from the diet [268–270].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended as a primary prevention measure for atopic dermatitis that all infants be exclusively breastfed for the first 4–6 months of life [271, 272].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended as a primary prevention measure for atopic dermatitis to introduce complementary foods from the 4th to the 6th month of the child's life, regardless of hereditary predisposition [272].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: this age period is considered optimal and represents the so-called "window of tolerance".
Recommended as primary prevention measures for atopic dermatitis, when necessary for supplementation in high-risk infants under 6 months of age, are prophylactic or therapeutic (extensively hydrolyzed) formulas [273, 274].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Recommended as complementary foods for healthy children without a family history of allergic diseases are adapted cow's milk-based formulas [274].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Recommended for pregnant women and newborns from risk groups are lactic acid-producing microorganisms and/or lactic acid-producing microorganisms in combination with other preparations [274–277].
GCR BLoE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Restrictive hypoallergenic diets are not recommended in the general population [278].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Currently, there is no convincing data on the efficacy of hypoallergenic or elimination diets during pregnancy regarding the development of atopic dermatitis in the general population [271].
Elimination diets are not recommended for healthy women during lactation [268, 269].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Recommended for pregnant women, children, and adults as a primary prevention measure for atopic dermatitis to control environmental factors is the avoidance of tobacco smoke exposure [279].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Smoking is unacceptable during pregnancy and lactation; passive smoking should be avoided from the first days of a child's life.
It is recommended as a primary prevention measure for atopic dermatitis in children, in order to control environmental factors, to maintain low humidity and adequate ventilation in the rooms where the child stays (avoiding dampness) [280].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Recommended for pregnant women, children, and adults as a primary prevention measure for atopic dermatitis to control environmental factors is the reduction of exposure to environmental pollutants and allergens [281, 282].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Elimination or removal of causally significant allergens is recommended. When sensitization to indoor, epidermal, or fungal allergens is established, elimination measures are recommended to reduce the severity of atopic dermatitis symptoms, decrease pharmacological burden, and prevent exacerbations. When symptoms of food allergy develop, including anaphylaxis—which is frequently observed in children and adults sensitized to food allergen proteins, determined by measuring allergen-specific IgE antibodies in blood serum—elimination diets excluding the causative allergens are recommended [270, 283].
Level of Recommendations C Level of Evidence 5Level of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Secondary prevention of atopic dermatitis is a set of measures aimed at eliminating pronounced risk factors that under certain conditions (stress, weakened immunity, excessive loads on any other functional systems of the body) can lead to the onset, exacerbation, and relapse of the disease.
It is recommended as a secondary prevention measure for atopic dermatitis to educate patients with atopic dermatitis and/or their family members [284–288].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended as a secondary prevention measure for atopic dermatitis to provide preventive counseling on correcting risk factors for non-communicable diseases [284–288].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Any preventive elimination measures prescribed for a long period can have a negative impact on family members, impairing their quality of life.
Tertiary prevention is a set of measures aimed at preventing exacerbations or the development of complications of atopic dermatitis.
It is recommended as tertiary prevention measures for atopic dermatitis to reduce the impact of trigger factors: limiting the use of soap and rough clothing; minimizing factors that contribute to excessive sweating [289, 290].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended as a tertiary prevention measure for atopic dermatitis to provide rational skin care [291, 292].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to follow the national immunization schedule when conducting routine vaccinations in children with atopic dermatitis [293–295].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Research data have shown no association between vaccination and the subsequent development of AD or its exacerbations; AD is not a contraindication to routine vaccinations. Vaccination is indicated for patients with AD to prevent or reduce the likelihood of a severe (complicated) course of vaccine-preventable infections, including those affecting the skin (e.g., chickenpox). Vaccination is carried out in accordance with Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 1122n dated December 6, 2021, "On Approval of the National Schedule of Preventive Vaccinations, the Schedule of Preventive Vaccinations by Epidemiological Indications, and the Procedure for Conducting Preventive Vaccinations," and Methodological Guidelines MU 3.3.1.1095-02 "Medical Contraindications to Preventive Vaccinations with National Immunization Schedule Preparations."
Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy must consult a physician prior to vaccination with live vaccines; immunization with attenuated live vaccines should ideally be performed 4 weeks before initiating immunosuppressive therapy. In cases of confirmed chicken egg protein allergy, a consultation with an allergist-immunologist may be conducted prior to vaccination. Vaccination is not performed during the acute phase of the disease.
6. Organization of Medical Care
As part of primary health care provision, general practitioners, district pediatricians, and general family physicians, upon detecting skin rashes, pruritus, or symptoms or signs of atopic dermatitis in patients, shall refer the patient to a dermatovenerological medical organization or an allergist-immunologist office for primary specialized health care, and shall also provide medical care in accordance with the recommendations of the dermatovenerological medical organization and/or the allergist-immunologist if there are no medical indications for referral.
If it is impossible to provide medical care within the framework of primary specialized medical care and if there are medical indications, the patient is referred to a medical organization providing specialized medical care.
Specialized, including high-tech, medical care is provided by dermatovenerologists and/or allergist-immunologists in inpatient settings.
Indications for scheduled hospitalization in a medical organization:
1) Indications for providing medical care in a day hospital setting:
insufficient efficacy of outpatient treatment in patients with localized rashes;
2) Indications for inpatient medical care:
lack of response to ongoing outpatient treatment;
severe atopic dermatitis requiring systemic therapy or phototherapy;
onset of a secondary infection not controllable in an outpatient setting;
development of a viral infection (Kaposi's varicelliform eruption).
3) Indications for discharging a patient from a medical organization:
partial or complete regression of rashes.
7. Additional Information
None.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria | Grade of Recommendation | Level of evidence | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | A general (clinical) blood test has been performed for atopic dermatitis patients receiving systemic therapy with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, dupilumab**, upadacitinib, or cyclosporine**. | 4 | C | ||
2 | A general biochemical blood test has been performed for atopic dermatitis patients receiving systemic therapy with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, dupilumab**, upadacitinib, or cyclosporine**. | 4 | C | ||
3 | A general urinalysis has been performed for atopic dermatitis patients receiving systemic therapy with cyclosporine**. | 4 | C | ||
4 | External therapy was administered using glucocorticoids used in dermatology and/or non-glucocorticoid dermatitis preparations and/or other dermatological drugs | 1 | A | ||
5 | Systemic therapy with systemic corticosteroids and/or cyclosporine** and/or dupilumab** and/or baricitinib** and/or upadacitinib** and/or abrocitinib and/or ultraviolet skin irradiation and/or external tacrolimus** therapy was administered to patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis | 2 | B | ||
6 | Systemic antihistamine therapy was administered for pruritus | 2 | C | ||
7 | External therapy with antibiotics and antimicrobial agents used in dermatology, and/or corticosteroids in combination with antibiotics, and/or corticosteroids in combination with other agents, and/|or antiseptics and disinfectants, and/or other therapeutic agents, and/or systemic antibacterial drugs was administered in case of secondary infection | 2 | C | ||
References
Show references
Palmer C.N., Irvine A.D., Terron-Kwiatkowski A. et al. Common loss-of-function variants of the epidermal barrier protein filaggrin are a major predisposing factor for atopic dermatitis. Nat. Genet. 2006; 38 (4): 441–446. doi: 10.1038/ng1767
McGirt L.Y., Beck L.A. Innate immune defects in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006; 118 (1): 202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.04.033
Bao L., Zhang H., Chan L.S. The involvement of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway in chronic inflammatory skin disease atopic dermatitis. JAKSTAT. 2013; 2(3): e24137. doi: 10.4161/jkst.24137
Gandhi N.A., Pirozzi G., Graham N.M. Commonality of the IL-4/IL-13 pathway in atopic diseases. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017; 13 (5): 425–437. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2017.1298443
Werfel T., Allam J.P., Biedermann T. et al. Cellular and molecular immunologic mechanisms in patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016; 138: 336–349. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.06.010
Wollenberg A., Barbarot S., Bieber T. et al. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part I. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018; 32 (5): 657–682. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14891
Kubanov A.A., Bogdanova E.V. Performance results of medical organizations providing medical care in the field of "dermatovenerology" in 2019–2021 in the Russian Federation. Vestnik Dermatologii i Venerologii. 2022; 98 (5): 18–33.
Schneider L., Hanifin J., Boguniewicz M. et al. Study of the atopic march: development of atopic comorbidities. Pediatr Dermatol. 2016; 33 (4): 388–398. doi: 10.1111/pde.12867
Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis 2.0: from the clinical phenotype to the molecular taxonomy and stratified medicine. Allergy. 2012; 67 (12); 1475–1482. doi: 10.1111/all.12049
van der Hulst A.E., Klip H., Brand P.L. Risk of developing asthma in young children with atopic eczema: a systematic review. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2007; 120 (3): 565–569. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.05.042
Eckert L., Gupta S., Amand C. et al. The burden of atopic dermatitis in US adults: Health care resource utilization data from the 2013 National Health and Wellness Survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018; 78 (1): 54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.002
Illi S., von Mutius E., Lau S. et al. The pattern of atopic sensitization is associated with the development of asthma in childhood. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 108 (5): 709–714. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.118786
Aw M., Penn J., Gauvreau G.M. et al. Atopic March: Collegium Internationale Allergologicum Update 2020. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2020; 181 (1): 1–10. doi: 10.1159/000502958
Spergel J.M. Epidemiology of atopic dermatitis and atopic march in children. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am. 2010; 30 (3): 269–280. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2010.06.003
Hill D.A., Spergel J.M. The atopic march: Critical evidence and clinical relevance. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018; 120 (2): 131–137. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.10.037
Williams H., Flohr C. How epidemiology has challenged 3 prevailing concepts about atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006; 118 (1): 209–213. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.04.043
Illi S., von Mutius E., Lau S. et al. The natural course of atopic dermatitis from birth to age 7 years and the association with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004; 113 (5): 925–931. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.01.778
Atopic Dermatitis: Recommendations for Practitioners. Russian Consensus National Document on Atopic Dermatitis. Ed. by R.M. Khaitov, A.A. Kubanova. Moscow: Pharmacus Print, 2002. 192 p.
Hanifin J.M., Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 1980; 92 (Suppl): 44–47.
Eichenfield L.F., Tom W.L., Chamlin S.L. et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014; 70 (2): 338–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.10.010
Ryan C., Amor K.T., Menter A. The use of cyclosporine in dermatology: part II.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010; 63 (6): 949–972. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.02.062
Samuel C., Cornman H., Kambala A., Kwatra S.G. A Review on the safety of using JAK inhibitors in dermatology: Clinical and laboratory monitoring. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Feb 15: 1–21. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-00892-5
Clinical Dermatovenerology: in 2 vols. / ed. by Yu.K. Skripkin, Yu.S. Butov. – Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2009. – Vol. II. – 928 p.
Wollenberg A, Christen-Zäch S, Taieb A, et al. ETFAD/EADV Eczema task force 2020 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults and children. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020; 34 (12): 2717–2744. doi:10.1111/jdv.16892
Wollenberg A., Kinberger M., Arents B. et al. European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: part I - systemic therapy. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022; 36 (9): 1409–1431. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18345
Eichenfield L.F., Tom W.L., Chamlin S.L. et al. Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: section 1. Diagnosis and assessment of atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014; 70 (2): 338–351. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.10.010
Sampson H. A., Albergo R. Comparison of results of skin tests, RAST, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1984; 74 (1): 26–33. doi: 10.1016/0091-6749(84)90083-6
Arbes S.J. Jr, Gergen P.J., Elliott L., Zeldin D.C. Prevalences of positive skin test responses to 10 common allergens in the US population: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005; 116 (2): 377–383. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.05.017
Roehr C.C., Reibel S., Ziegert M. et al. Atopy patch tests, together with determination of specific IgE levels, reduce the need for oral food challenges in children with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 107 (3): 548–553. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.112849
Darsow U., Laifaoui J., Kerschenlohr K. et al. The prevalence of positive reactions in the atopy patch test with aeroallergens and food allergens in subjects with atopic eczema: a European multicenter study. Allergy. 2004; 59 (12): 1318–1325. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00556.x
Cartledge N., Chan S. Atopic dermatitis and food allergy: A paediatric approach. Curr Pediatr Rev. 2018; 14 (3): 171–179. doi: 10.2174/1573396314666180613083616
Allergology and Immunology: National Guidelines / Ed. by Khaitov R.M., Ilyina N.I. – Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2009 – 656 p.
Matricardi P.M., Kleine-Tebbe J., Hoffmann H.J. et al. EAACI Molecular Allergology User"s Guide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016 May; 27 Suppl 23: 1–250. doi: 10.1111/pai.12563
Futamura M., Leshem Y.A., Thomas K.S. et al. A systematic review of Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) in atopic dermatitis (AD) trials: Many options, no standards. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016; 74 (2): 288–294. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.09.062
Oranje A.P., Stalder J.F., Taieb A.et al. Scoring of atopic dermatitis by SCORAD using a training atlas by investigators from different disciplines. ETAC Study Group. Early Treatment of the Atopic Child. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 1997; 8 (1): 28–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.1997.tb00139.x
Schram M.E., Spuls P.I., Leeflang M.M. et al. EASI, (objective) SCORAD and POEM for atopic eczema: responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference. Allergy. 2012; 67 (1): 99–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02719.x
Giam Y.C., Hebert A.A., Dizon M.V. A review on the role of moisturizers for atopic dermatitis. Asia Pac Allergy. 2016; 6 (2): 120–128. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2016.6.2.120
Breternitz M., Kowatzki D., Langenauer M. et al. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, prospective study of a glycerol-based emollient on eczematous skin in atopic dermatitis: biophysical and clinical evaluation. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2008; 21 (1): 39–45. doi: 10.1159/000111134
Verallo-Rowell V.M., Dillague K.M., Syah-Tjundawan B.S. Novel antibacterial and emollient effects of coconut and virgin olive oils in adult atopic dermatitis. Dermatitis. 2008;19 (6): 308–315.
Simpson E., Dutronc Y. A new body moisturizer increases skin hydration and improves atopic dermatitis symptoms among children and adults. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011; 10 (7): 744–749.
Lindh J.D., Bradley M. Clinical effectiveness of moisturizers in atopic dermatitis and related disorders: a systematic review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015; 16 (5): 341–359. doi: 10.1007/s40257-015-0146-4
Miller D.W., Koch S.B., Yentzer B.A. et al. An over-the-counter moisturizer is as clinically effective as, and more cost-effective than, prescription barrier creams in the treatment of children with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: a randomized, controlled trial. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011; 10 (5): 531–537.
Grimalt R., Mengeaud V., Cambazard F. The steroid-sparing effect of an emollient therapy in infants with atopic dermatitis: a randomized controlled study. Dermatology. 2007; 214 (1): 61–67. doi: 10.1159/000096915
Msika P., De Belilovsky C., Piccardi N. et al. New emollient with topical corticosteroid-sparing effect in treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis: SCORAD and quality of life improvement. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008; 25 (6): 606–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00783.x
Lucky A.W., Leach A.D., Laskarzewski P., Wenck H. Use of an emollient as a steroid-sparing agent in the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatr Dermatol. 1997; 14 (4): 321–324. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1997.tb00968.x
Eberlein B., Eicke C., Reinhardt H.W., Ring J. Adjuvant treatment of atopic eczema: assessment of an emollient containing N-palmitoylethanolamine (ATOPA study). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008; 22 (1): 73–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02351.x
Sugarman J.L., Parish L.C. Efficacy of a lipid-based barrier repair formulation in moderate-to-severe pediatric atopic dermatitis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009; 8 (12): 1106–1111.
Leung T.N., Chow C.M., Chow M.P. et al. Clinical guidelines on management of atopic dermatitis in children. Hong Kong J Paediatr (new series). 2013; 18: 96–104.
Darsow U., Wollenberg A., Simon D. et al. ETFAD/EADV Eczema Task Force 2009 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010; 24 (3): 317–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03415.x
Chiang C., Eichenfield L.F. Quantitative assessment of combination bathing and moisturizing regimens on skin hydration in atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2009; 26 (3): 273–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2009.00911.x
Dabade T.S., Davis D.M., Wetter D.A. et al. Wet dressing therapy in conjunction with topical corticosteroids is effective for rapid control of severe pediatric atopic dermatitis: experience with 218 patients over 30 years at Mayo Clinic. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012; 67 (1):100–106. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.06.025
Devillers A.C., Oranje A.P. Efficacy and safety of ‘wet-wrap’ dressings as an intervention treatment in children with severe and/or refractory atopic dermatitis: a critical review of the literature. Br J Dermatol. 2006; 154 (4): 579–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07157.x
Devillers A.C., de Waard-van der Spek F.B., Mulder P.G., Oranje A.P. Treatment of refractory atopic dermatitis using ‘wet-wrap’ dressings and diluted corticosteroids: results of standardized treatment in both children and adults. Dermatology. 2002; 204 (1): 50–55. doi: 10.1159/000051810
Goodyear H.M., Spowart K., Harper J.I. ‘Wet-wrap’ dressings for the treatment of atopic eczema in children. Br J Dermatol. 1991; 125 (6): 604. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1991.tb14807.x
Brenninkmeijer E.E., Spuls P.I., Lindeboom R. et al. Excimer laser vs. clobetasol propionate 0·05% ointment in prurigo form of atopic dermatitis: a randomized controlled trial, a pilot. Br J Dermatol. 2010; 163 (4): 823–831. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09858.x
Pels R., Sterry W., Lademann J. Clobetasol propionate – where, when, why? Drugs Today (Barc). 2008; 44 (7): 547–557. doi: 10.1358/dot.2008.44.7.1122221
Breneman D., Fleischer A.B. Jr, Kaplan D. et al. Clobetasol propionate 0.05% lotion in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized evaluation versus clobetasol propionate emollient cream. J Drugs Dermatol. 2005; 4 (3): 330–336.
Feldman S.R. Relative efficacy and interchangeability of various clobetasol propionate vehicles in the management of steroid-responsive dermatoses. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2005; 66 (3): 154–171. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.06.010
Datz B., Yawalkar S. A double-blind, multicenter trial of 0.05% halobetasol propionate ointment and 0.05% clobetasol 17-propionate ointment in the treatment of patients with chronic, localized atopic dermatitis or lichen simplex chronicus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991; 25 (6 Pt 2): 1157–1160. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70316-t
Vanderploeg D.E. Betamethasone dipropionate ointment in the treatment of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis: a double-blind study. South Med J. 1976; 69 (7): 862–863. doi: 10.1097/00007611-197607000-00017
Queille C., Pommarede R., Saurat J.H. Efficacy versus systemic effects of six topical steroids in the treatment of atopic dermatitis of childhood. Pediatr Dermatol. 1984; 1 (3): 246–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.1984.tb01124.x
Cabrera M.E. Treatment of severe or resistant corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses with Diprolene cream. J Int Med Res. 1984; 12 (3): 163–169. doi: 10.1177/030006058401200305
Lodolo J.C. Diprolene cream in the treatment of severe or resistant corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses. J Int Med Res. 1984; 12 (2): 114–120. doi: 10.1177/030006058401200209
Peterkin G.A., Morley W.N., Chalmers D. Triamcinolone and fluocinolone acetonide ointments in atopic eczema. Br Med J. 1962; 1 (5289): 1392. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5289.1392
Hanifin J.M. Atopic dermatitis. Special clinical complications. Postgrad Med. 1983; 74 (3):188–193, 196–199. doi: 10.1080/00325481.1983.11698425
Cadmus S.D., Sebastian K.R., Warren D. et al. Efficacy and patient opinion of wet‐wrap dressings using 0.1% triamcinolone acetonide ointment vs cream in the treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis: A randomized split‐body control study. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019; 36 (4): 437–441. doi: 10.1111/pde.13830
Wolkerstorfer A., Strobos M.A., Glazenburg E.J. et al. Fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream once daily versus clobetasone butyrate 0.05% cream twice daily in children with atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998; 39 (2 Pt 1): 226–231. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70080-5
Bleehen S.S., Chu A.C., Hamann I. et al. Fluticasone propionate 0.05% cream in the treatment of atopic eczema: a multicentre study comparing once-daily treatment and once-daily vehicle cream application versus twice-daily treatment. Br J Dermatol. 1995; 133 (4): 592–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1995.tb02711.x
Belousova T.A., Goryachkina M.V. Experience with fluticasone propionate (Cutivate) in the therapy of psoriasis, eczema, and atopic dermatitis. Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2010; 9: 24–29.
Viglioglia P., Jones M.L., Peets E.A. Once-daily 0.1% mometasone furoate cream versus twice-daily 0.1% betamethasone valerate cream in the treatment of a variety of dermatoses. J Int Med Res. 1990; 18 (6): 460–467. doi: 10.1177/030006059001800603
Prakash A., Benfield P. Topical mometasone. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in the treatment of dermatological disorders. Drugs. 1998; 55 (1): 145–163. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199855010-00009
Vernon H.J., Lane A.T., Weston W. Comparison of mometasone furoate 0.1% cream and hydrocortisone 1.0% cream in the treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991; 24 (4): 603–607. doi: 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70092-g
Lebwohl M. A comparison of once-daily application of mometasone furoate 0.1% cream compared with twice-daily hydrocortisone valerate 0.2% cream in pediatric atopic dermatitis patients who failed to respond to hydrocortisone: mometasone furoate study group. Int J Dermatol. 1999; 38 (8): 604–606. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-4362.1999.00759.x
Tomilova A.Yu., Torshkhoeva R.M., Gevorkyan A.K., Voznesenskaya N.I. Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate in atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatric Pharmacology 2009; 6 (4): 123–127.
Shaipov T.S., Mazitova L.P. Use of mometasone furoate in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatric Pharmacology. 2007; 4 (5): 41–44.
Nenasheva N.M. Features of atopic dermatitis in adult patients. Effective Pharmacotherapy. Dermatovenerology and Dermatocosmetology. 2012; (3): 6–15.
Lane A.T. Efficacy and safety of topical steroids in paediatric atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 1997; 8: S24–S27.
Faergemann J., Christensen O., Sjövall P. et al. An open study of efficacy and safety of long‐term treatment with mometasone furoate fatty cream in the treatment of adult patients with atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000; 14 (5): 393–396. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2000.00099.x
Haneke E. The treatment of atopic dermatitis with methylprednisolone aceponate (MPA), a new topical corticosteroid. J Dermatol Treat. 1992; 3 (Suppl.2): 13–15.
Luger T.A. Balancing efficacy and safety in the management of atopic dermatitis: the role of methylprednisolone aceponate. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011; 25 (3): 251–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03789.x
Bieber T., Vick K., Fölster-Holst R. et al. Efficacy and safety of methylprednisolone aceponate ointment 0.1% compared to tacrolimus 0.03% in children and adolescents with an acute flare of severe atopic dermatitis. Allergy. 2007; 62 (2): 184–189. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01269.x
Kondratyeva Yu.S., Karkhova V.V. Experience with 0.1% methylprednisolone aceponate in the complex therapy of steroid-responsive dermatoses. Vestnik Dermatologii i Venerologii. 2016; 1: 93–98.
Chikin V.V. Methylprednisolone aceponate and dexpanthenol in the topical therapy of patients with atopic dermatitis. Vestnik Dermatologii i Venerologii. 2014; 5: 112–116.
Lassus A. Alclometasone dipropionate cream 0.05% versus clobetasone butyrate cream 0.05%. A controlled clinical comparison in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children. Int J Dermatol. 1984; 23 (8): 565–566. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1984.tb04214.x
Panja S.K., Gangopadhaya A.K., Sharma S.D. A randomised, double-blind comparison of alclometasone dipropionate 0.05% cream in atopic dermatitis and other dermatoses. Indian J Dermatol. 1988; 33 (1): 1–4.
Makarova I.V., Gayduk I.M., Zhiglinskaya O.V. et al. Use of 0.05% alclometasone dipropionate cream in the therapy of atopic dermatitis in early childhood. Current Pediatrics. 2004; 3 (4): 84–87.
Korotkiy N.G., Tikhomirov A.A., Gamayunov B.N. Evaluation of the clinical efficacy of the modern steroid alclometasone dipropionate (Afloderm) in the external therapy of atopic dermatitis in children. Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2007; 6: 24–31.
Toropova N.P., Cherkasova L.A., Platonova I.N. et al. Experience with the drug "Afloderm" (alclometasone dipropionate) in pediatric dermatological practice. Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases. 2003; 3: 39–40.
Veien N.K., Hattel T., Justesen O. et al. Hydrocortisone 17-butyrate (Locoid) 0.1% cream versus hydrocortisone (Uniderm) 1% cream in the treatment of children suffering from atopic dermatitis. J Int Med Res. 1984; 12 (5): 310–313. doi: 10.1177/030006058401200509
Rajka G., Verjans H.L. Hydrocortisone 17-butyrate (Locoid) 0.1% fatty cream versus desonide (Apolar) 0.1% ointment in the treatment of patients suffering from atopic dermatitis. J Int Med Res. 1986; 14 (2): 85–90. doi: 10.1177/030006058601400206
Abramovits A, Oquendo M. Hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% lipocream in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis. SKINmed. 2010; 8: 72–79.
Koopmans B., Lasthein Andersen B., Mork N.J. et al. Multicentre randomized double-blind study of locoid lipocream fatty cream twice daily versus locoid lipocream once daily and locobase once daily. J Dermatol Treat. 1995; 6 (2): 103–106.
Saki N, Jowkar F, Alyaseen S. et al. Comparison of sertaconazole 2% cream versus hydrocortisone 1% ointment in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2013;24 (6): 447–449. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2013.782384
Reitamo S., Rustin M., Ruzicka T. et al. Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment compared with that of hydrocortisone butyrate ointment in adult patients with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002; 109 (3): 547–555. doi: 10.1067/mai.2002.121832
Matheson R., Kempers S., Breneman D. et al. Hydrocortisone butyrate 0.1% lotion in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in pediatric subjects. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008; 7 (3): 266–271.
Sears H.W., Bailer J.W., Yeadon A. Efficacy and safety of hydrocortisone buteprate 0.1% cream in patients with atopic dermatitis. Clin Ther. 1997; 19 (4): 710–719. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(97)80095-1
Ignatiev D.V., Kochergin N.G. Topical corticosteroids in the practice of a dermatologist. Features of hydrocortisone butyrate (Locoid). Dermatology. Supplement to Consilium Medicum. 2007; 1: 50–54.
Udompataikul M., Limpa-o-Vart D. Comparative trial of 5% dexpanthenol in water-in-oil formulation with 1% hydrocortisone ointment in the treatment of childhood atopic dermatitis: a pilot study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012; 11 (3): 366–374.
Sergeev Yu.V., Ivanov O.L., Novikov D.K. et al. Atopic dermatitis: modern diagnosis and treatment. Immunopathology, Allergology, Infectology. 2001; 4: 39–63.
Ashcroft D.M., Dimmock P., Garside R. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of topical pimecrolimus and tacrolimus in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005; 330 (7490): 516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38376.439653.D3
Van Leent E.J., Graber M., Thurston M. et al. Effectiveness of the ascomycin macrolactam SDZ ASM 981 in the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. 1998; 134 (7): 805–809. doi: 10.1001/archderm.134.7.805
Meurer M., Fölster-Holst R., Wozel G. et al. Pimecrolimus cream in the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in adults: a six-month study. Dermatology. 2002; 205 (3): 271–277. doi: 10.1159/000065863
Wahn U., Bos J., Goodfield M. et al. Efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream in the long-term management of atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatrics. 2002; 110 (1 Pt 1): e2. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.1.e2
Ho V.C., Gupta A., Kaufmann R. et al. Safety and efficacy of nonsteroid pimecrolimus cream 1% in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in infants. J Pediatr. 2003; 142 (2): 155–162. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2003.65
Eichenfield L.F., Lucky A.W., Boguniewicz M. et al. Safety and efficacy of pimecrolimus (ASM 981) cream 1% in the treatment of mild and moderate atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002; 46 (4): 495–504. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.122187
Langley R.G., Eichenfield L.F., Lucky A.W. et al. Sustained efficacy and safety of pimecrolimus cream 1% when used long-term (up to 26 weeks) to treat children withatopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2008; 25 (3): 301–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00671.x
Luger T., van Leent E.J., Graeber M. et al. SDZ ASM 981: an emerging safe and effective treatment for atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2001; 144 (4): 788–794. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04134.x
Eichenfield L.F., Thaci D., de Prost Y. et al. Clinical management of atopic eczema with pimecrolimus cream 1% (Elidel) in paediatric patients. Dermatology. 2007; 215 Suppl.1: 3–17. doi: 10.1159/000102116
Reda A.M., Elgendi A., Ebraheem A.I, et al. A practical algorithm for topical treatment of atopic dermatitis in the Middle East emphasizing the importance of sensitive skin areas. J Dermatolog Treat. 2019; 30 (4): 366–373. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1524823
Ruzicka T., Bieber T., Schöpf E. et al. A short-term trial of tacrolimus ointment for atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 1997; 337 (12): 816–821. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199709183371203
Reitamo S., Wollenberg A., Schöpf E. et al. Safety and efficacy of 1 year of tacrolimus ointment monotherapy in adults with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. 2000; 136 (8): 999–1006. doi: 10.1001/archderm.136.8.999
Chen S.L., Yan J., Wang F.S. Two topical calcineurin inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Dermatolog Treat. 2010; 21 (3): 144–156. doi: 10.3109/09546630903401470
Bornhövd E.C., Burgdorf W.H., Wollenberg A. Immunomodulatory macrolactams for topical treatment of inflammatory skin diseases. Curr Opin Investig Drugs. 2002; 3 (5): 708–712.
Lubbe J. Klinische Erfahrungen mit topischen Calcineurininhibitoren in der Praxis. Hautarzt. 2003; 54 (5): 432–439.
Reitamo S., Ortonne J.P., Sand C. et al. A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, controlled study of long-term treatment with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2005; 152 (6): 1282–1289. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06592.x
Patel R.R., Vander Straten M.R., Korman N.J. The safety and efficacy of tacrolimus therapy in patients younger than 2 years with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. 2003; 139 (9): 1184–1186. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.9.1184
Wollenberg A., Sidhu M.K., Odeyemi I. et al. Economic evaluation of maintenance treatment with tacrolimus 0.1% ointment in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2008; 159 (6): 1322–1330. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08807.x
Healy E., Bentley A., Fidler C., Chambers C. Cost-effectiveness of tacrolimus ointment in adults and children with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis: twice-weekly maintenance treatment vs. standard twicedaily reactive treatment of exacerbations from a third party payer (U.K. National Health Service) perspective. Br J Dermatol. 2011; 164 (2): 387–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10141.x
Reitamo S., Mandelin J., Rubins A. et al. The pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus after first and repeated dosing with 0.03% ointment in infants with atopic dermatitis. Int J Dermatol. 2009; 48 (4): 348–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.03853.x
Reitamo S., Rustin M., Harper J. et al. A 4-year follow-up study of atopic dermatitis therapy with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in children and adult patients. Br J Dermatol. 2008; 159 (4): 942–951. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08747.x
Mandelin J.M., Remitz A., Virtanen H.M. et al. A 10-year open follow-up of eczema and respiratory symptoms in patients with atopic dermatitis treated with topical tacrolimus for the first 4 years. J Dermatolog Treat. 2010; 21 (3): 167–170. doi: 10.3109/09546630903493329
Mandelin J., Remitz A., Virtanen H.M. et al. One-year treatment with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment versus a corticosteroid regimen in adults with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind, comparative trial. Acta Derm Venereol. 2010; 90 (2): 170–174. doi: 10.2340/00015555-0803
Boguniewicz M., Fiedler V.C., Raimer S. et al. A randomized, vehicle-controlled trial of tacrolimus ointment for treatment of atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatric Tacrolimus Study Group. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998; 102 (4 Pt 1): 637–644. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70281-7
Elisyutina O.G., Fedenko E.S., Shtyrbul O.V., Niyazov D.D. Use of tacrolimus in patients with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis. First clinical experience in Russia. Russian Journal of Allergy 2011; 6: 68–76.
Proshutinskaya D.V., Butareva M.M., Inoyatova L.A. New treatment options for atopic dermatitis in children and adults. Vestnik Dermatologii i Venerologii 2013; 3: 78–82.
Samtsov A.V., Sukharev A.V., Patrushev A.V., Bondar O.I. Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 0.1% tacrolimus ointment in the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Vestnik Dermatologii i Venerologii 2012; 2: 71–77.
Samtsov A.V., Sukharev A.V., Patrushev A.V. Treatment of atopic dermatitis: advantages of tacrolimus over topical corticosteroids. Effective Pharmacotherapy 2014; 19: 4–10.
Kubanov A.A., Petrovsky F.I. Activated zinc pyrithione (Skin-cap). Mechanisms of action. Clinical application. Vestnik Dermatologii i Venerologii, 2009; 5: 35–42.
Fassakhov R.S., Pampura A.N., Korostovtsev D.S. et al. Skin-Cap in the therapy of atopic dermatitis in children (based on the results of the Russian multicenter study CADET). Russian Journal of Allergy 2007; 2: 75–81.
Fassakhov R.S., Pampura A.N., Korostovtsev D.S. et al. Efficacy and safety of activated zinc pyrithione (skin-cap) in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in children (results of a Russian multicenter study). Bulletin of Pediatric Pharmacology and Nutrition 2006; 3 (6): 28–31.
Neurodermatoses. In: Skin and Venereal Diseases: A Guide for Physicians. In two volumes. – 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. – Vol. 2/ Ed. by Yu.K. Skripkin and V.N. Mordovtsev, - Moscow: Meditsina, 1999. – P. 9–49.
Yoshida H., Niimura M., Ueda H. et al. Clinical evaluation of ketotifen syrup on atopic dermatitis: a comparative multicenter double-blind study of ketotifen and clemastine. Ann Allergy. 1989; 62 (6): 507–512.
Grigorieva I., Sergeev A., Manina I., Kudryavtseva E. Immunopathology and biochemical basis of atopic conditions. Vrach. 2012; 4: 86–91.
Morozova S.V., Luss L.V. Chloropyramine: modern aspects of application. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii. 2007; 6 (1): 137–140.
Goryachkina M.V., Belousova T.A. Chloropyramine: clinical aspects of application. Russian Medical Journal. Allergology. 2014; 24: 1785–1789.
Petrova K.S., Petrova G.A. Chloropyramine (Suprastin) – modern aspects of application in the therapy of allergic dermatoses. Russian Medical Journal. Pharmacotherapy. 2014; 8: 617–620.
Revyakina V.A. Antihistamines in clinical practice. Russian Medical Journal. Allergology. 2014; 11: 854–856.
Behrendt H., Ring J. Histamine, antihistamines and atopic eczema. Clin Exp Allergy. 1990; 20 (Suppl 4): 25–30.
Fedenko E.S. Fencarol in the combination therapy of atopic dermatitis and chronic urticaria. Allergiya, astma i klinicheskaya immunologiya. 2003; 6: 10–12.
Tamrazova O.B., Glukhova E.A., Dubovets N.F., Goncharova L.V. The significance of pruritus, pathogenetic mechanisms of its formation and assessment of clinical manifestations in atopic dermatitis. Praktika pediatra. 2022; 2: 14–21.
Langeland T., Fagertun H.E., Larsen S. Therapeutic effect of loratadine on pruritus in patients with atopic dermatitis. A multi-crossover-designed study. Allergy. 1994; 49 (1): 22–26. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.1994.tb00768.x
Monroe E.W. Relative efficacy and safety of loratadine, hydroxyzine, and placebo in chronic idiopathic urticaria and atopic dermatitis. Clin Ther. 1992; 14 (1): 17–21.
Popova I.S., Matushevskaya E.V., Svirshchevskaya E.V. Double-blind placebo-controlled study of the efficacy and tolerability of clarotadine in atopic dermatitis. Russian Medical Journal. Dermatology, Venereology. 2001; 9 (4): 477–483.
Hannuksela M., Kalimo K., Lammintausta K. et al. Dose ranging study: cetirizine in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults. Ann Allergy. 1993; 70 (2): 127–133.
La Rosa M., Ranno C., Musarra I. et al. Double-blind study of cetirizine in atopic eczema in children. Ann Allergy. 1994; 73 (2): 117–122.
Pavlova O.V. Experience with cetirizine (Allertec) in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis and eczema. Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii. 2005; (4): 41–43.
Makarova I.V., Zhiglinskaya O.V., Mikhailova E.A., Sukhorukova V.G. Comparative efficacy of generic cetirizine (manufactured by EGIS, Hungary) and the original drop formulation in the combination therapy of atopic dermatitis in young children. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii. 2007; 6 (3): 85–88.
Samsygina G.A. Allergic diseases in children. – Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2019. – 272 p.
Delyagin V.M., Urazbagambetov A. Use of Suprastinex (levocetirizine) in atopy in children and adolescents. Russian Medical Journal. Pediatrics. 2012; (16): 828–830.
Elisyutina O.G., Fedenko E.S., Fedoskova T.G., Luss L.V. Efficacy of levocetirizine therapy in patients with allergic dermatoses. Russian Allergological Journal. 2012; 5: 69-75
Tamrazova O.B. Pathogenetic therapy for children suffering from severe forms of atopic dermatitis. Russian Medical Journal. Pediatrics. 2013; (2): 108–114.
Nazhmutdinova D.K., Shvets O.I. Levocetirizine: reboot. Russian Medical Journal. Dermatology. 2011; 21: 1324–1326.
Kamaev A.V., Trusova O.V., Kamaeva I.A. Pruritus in atopic dermatitis in children: known mechanisms and possibilities for its long-term control. Russian Medical Journal. 2015; 3: 142–146.
Monakhov S.A., Korzhachkina N.B., Olisova O.Yu. 311 nm narrowband phototherapy in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis. Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases. 2012; 3: 25–27.
Majoie I.M., Oldhoff J.M., van Weelden H. et al. Narrowband ultraviolet B and medium-dose ultraviolet A1 are equally effective in the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60 (1): 77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.08.048
Reynolds N.J., Franklin V., Gray J.C. et al. Narrow-band ultraviolet B and broad-band ultraviolet A phototherapy in adult atopic eczema: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2001; 357 (9273): 2012–2016. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)05114-X
Clayton T.H., Clark S.M., Turner D., Goulden V. The treatment of severe atopic dermatitis in childhood with narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007; 32 (1): 28–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2006.02292.x
Seccombe L., Wynne M.D., Clancy C. et al. A retrospective review of phototherapy in children, at a tertiary paediatric dermatology unit. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2021; 37 (1): 34–38. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12604
Gambichler T., Othlinghaus N., Tomi N.S. et al. Medium-dose ultraviolet (UV) A1 vs. narrowband UVB phototherapy in atopic eczema: a randomized crossover study. Br J Dermatol. 2009; 160 (3): 652–658. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08984.x
Bogaczewicz J., Malinowska K., Sysa-Jedrzejowska A., Wozniacka A. Medium-dose ultraviolet A1 phototherapy improves SCORAD index and increases mRNA expression of interleukin-4 without direct effect on human β defensin-1, interleukin-10, and interleukin-31. Int J Dermatol. 2016; 55 (7): e380–e385. doi: 10.1111/ijd.13213
Tzaneva S., Seeber A., Schwaiger M. et al. High-dose versus medium-dose UVA1 phototherapy for patients with severe generalized atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001; 45 (4): 503–507. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2001.114743
Malinowska K., Wozniacka A., Bogaczewicz J. The impact of medium dose UVA1 phototherapy on pruritus, DLQI and SCORAD index in patients with atopic dermatitis. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2020; 37 (6): 962–967. doi: 10.5114/ada.2019.88465
Abeck D., Schmidt T., Fesq H. et al. Long-term efficacy of medium-dose UVA1 phototherapy in atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000; 42 (2 Pt 1): 254–257. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(00)90134-8
Pugashetti R., Lim H.W., Koo J. Broadband UVB revisited: is the narrowband UVB fad limiting our therapeutic options? J DermatologTreat. 2010; 21 (6): 326–330. doi: 10.3109/09546630903341986
Pérez-Ferriols A., Aranegui B., Pujol-Montcusí J.A. et al. Phototherapy in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review of the literature. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2015; 106 (5): 387–401. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2014.12.017
Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine: National Guidelines / Ed. by G.N. Ponomarenko. – Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2016. 688 p.
Special Physiotherapy: Textbook / Ed. by G.N. Ponomarenko. — Moscow: Meditsina Publishing House JSC, 2005, 744 p.
Patrizi A., Raone B., Ravaioli G.M. Management of atopic dermatitis: safety and efficacy of phototherapy. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015; 8: 511–520. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S87987
Dogra S., Mahajan R.; Indian Association of Dermatologists, Venereologists and Leprologists. Phototherapy for atopic dermatitis. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2015; 81 (1): 10–15. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.148557
Kubanova A.A., Samsonov V.A., Volnukhin V.A. et al. Therapy of patients with psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and vitiligo using narrowband ultraviolet B radiation with a wavelength of 311 nm. Medical Technology No. FS-2006/250 dated August 15, 2006. Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii. 2008; 3: 17–20.
Thompson K.G., Kim N. Distinguishing myth from fact: photocarcinogenesis and phototherapy. Dermatol Clin. 2020; 38 (1): 25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2019.08.003
Simpson E.L., Sinclair R., Forman S. et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (JADE MONO-1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020; 396 (10246): 255–266. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30732-7. PMID: 32711801.
Silverberg J.I., Simpson E.L., Thyssen J.P. et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020; 156 (8): 863–873. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.1406
Bieber T., Simpson E.L., Silverberg J.I. et al. Abrocitinib versus placebo or dupilumab for atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2021; 384 (12): 1101–1112. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2019380
Blauvelt A., Silverberg J.I., Lynde C.W. et al. Abrocitinib induction, randomized withdrawal, and retreatment in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Results from the JAK1 Atopic Dermatitis Efficacy and Safety (JADE) REGIMEN phase 3 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022; 86 (1): 104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.05.075.
Eichenfield L.F., Flohr C., Sidbury R. et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib in combination with topical therapy in adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: The JADE TEEN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2021; 157 (10): 1165–1173. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.2830
Reich K., Thyssen J.P., Blauvelt A. et al. Efficacy and safety of abrocitinib versus dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022; 400 (10348): 273–282. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01199-0.
Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Nosbaum A. et al. Integrated safety analysis of abrocitinib for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis from the phase II and phase III clinical tial program. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021; 22 (5): 693–707. doi: 10.1007/s40257-021-00618-3.
Reich K., Kabashima K., Peris K. et al. Efficacy and safety of baricitinib combined with topical corticosteroids for treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020; 156 (12): 1333–1343. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3260.
Simpson E.L., Lacour J.P., Spelman L. et al. Baricitinib in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis and inadequate response to topical corticosteroids: results from two randomized monotherapy phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2020; 183 (2): 242–255. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18898.
Bieber T., Thyssen J.P., Reich K. et al. Pooled safety analysis of baricitinib in adult patients with atopic dermatitis from 8 randomized clinical trials. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021; 35 (2): 476–485. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16948.
Paller A.S., Siegfried E.C., Thaçi D. et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroids in children 6 to 11 years old with severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020; 83 (5): 1282–1293. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.054
Paller A.S., Bansal A., Simpson E.L. et al. Clinically meaningful responses to dupilumab in adolescents with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Post-hoc analyses from a randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020; 21 (1): 119–131. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00478-y
Simpson E.L., Paller A.S., Siegfried E.C. et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adolescents with uncontrolled moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: A phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2020; 156 (1): 44–56. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.3336
Cork M.J., Thaçi D., Eichenfield L.F. et al. Dupilumab in adolescents with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: results from a phase IIa open-label trial and subsequent phase III open-label extension. Br J Dermatol. 2020; 182 (1): 85–96. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18476
Simpson E.L., Bieber T., Guttman-Yassky E. et al. Two phase 3 trials of dupilumab versus placebo in atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375 (24): 2335–2348. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610020
Blauvelt A., de Bruin-Weller M., Gooderham M. et al. Long-term management of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis with dupilumab and concomitant topical corticosteroids (LIBERTY AD CHRONOS): a 1-year, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017; 389 (10086): 2287–2303. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31191-1
de Bruin-Weller M., Thaçi D., Smith C.H. et al. Dupilumab with concomitant topical corticosteroid treatment in adults with atopic dermatitis with an inadequate response or intolerance to ciclosporin A or when this treatment is medically inadvisable: a placebo-controlled, randomized phase III clinical trial (LIBERTY AD CAFÉ). Br J Dermatol. 2018; 178 (5): 1083–1101. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16156
Thaçi D., L Simpson E., Deleuran M. et al. Efficacy and safety of dupilumab monotherapy in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a pooled analysis of two phase 3 randomized trials (LIBERTY AD SOLO 1 and LIBERTY AD SOLO 2). J Dermatol Sci. 2019; 94 (2): 266–275. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2019.02.002
Cork M.J., Eckert L., Simpson E.L. et al. Dupilumab improves patient-reported symptoms of atopic dermatitis, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and health-related quality of life in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: analysis of pooled data from the randomized trials SOLO 1 and SOLO 2. J Dermatolog Treat. 2020; 31 (6): 606–614. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1612836
Snast I., Reiter O., Hodak E. et al. Are biologics efficacious in atopic dermatitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018; 19 (2): 145–165. doi: 10.1007/s40257-017-0324-7
Wang F.P., Tang X.J., Wei C.Q. et al. Dupilumab treatment in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dermatol Sci. 2018; 90 (2): 190–198. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2018.01.016
Guttman-Yassky E., Teixeira H.D., Simpson E.L. et al. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021; 397 (10290): 2151–2168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00588-2
Reich K., Teixeira H.D., de Bruin-Weller M. et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021; 397 (10290): 2169–2181. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00589-4
Silverberg J.I., de Bruin-Weller M., Bieber T. et al. Upadacitinib plus topical corticosteroids in atopic dermatitis: Week-52 AD Up study results. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022; 149 (3): 977–987.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.07.036
Simpson E.L., Papp K.A., Blauvelt A. et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: Analysis of follow-up data from the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 randomized clinical trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022; 158 (4): 404–413. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0029
Blauvelt A., Teixeira H.D., Simpson E.L. et al. Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib vs dupilumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2021; 157 (9): 1047–1055. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3023
Silverberg J.I., Thyssen J.P., Fahrbach K. et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used in moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021; 35 (9): 1797–1810. doi:10.1111/jdv.17351
Pereyra-Rodriguez J.J., Alcantara-Luna S., Domínguez-Cruz J. et al. Short-term effectiveness and safety of biologics and small molecule drugs for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Life (Basel). 2021; 11 (9): 927. doi:10.3390/life11090927
Silverberg J.I., Hong H.C., Thyssen J.P. et al. Comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis without topical corticosteroids: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2022; 12 (5): 1181–1196. doi: 10.1007/s13555-022-00721-1
Czech W., Brautigam M., Weidinger G., Schöpf E. Body weight independent dosing regimen of cyclosporine microemulsion is effective in severe atopic dermatitis and improves the quality of life. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42 (4): 653–659.
Harper J.I., Ahmed I., Barclay G. et al. Cyclosporin for severe childhood atopic dermatitis: short course versus continuous therapy. Br J Dermatol 2000; 142 (1): 52–58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03241.x
Granlund H., Erkko P., Remitz A. et al. Comparison of cyclosporin and UVAB phototherapy for intermittent one-year treatment of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol 2001; 81 (1): 22–27. doi: 10.1080/00015550120235
Zurbriggen B., Wuthrich B., Cachelin A.B. et al. Comparison of two formulations of cyclosporin A in the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis. A double-blind, single-centre, cross-over pilot study. Dermatology 1999; 198 (1): 56–60. doi: 10.1159/000018065
Hijnen D.J., ten Berge O., Timmer-de Mik L.et al. Efficacy and safety of long-term treatment with cyclosporin A for atopic dermatitis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007; 21 (1): 85–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01877.x
Schmitt J., Schmitt N., Meurer M. Cyclosporin in the treatment of patients with atopic eczema a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007; 21 (5): 606–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02023.x
Amor K.T., Ryan K., Menter A. The use of cyclosporine in dermatology: Part I. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010; 63 (6): 925–946. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2010.02.063
Wollenberg A., Barbarot S., Bieber T. et al. Consensus-based European guidelines for treatment of atopic eczema (atopic dermatitis) in adults and children: part II. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018; 32 (6): 850–878. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14888
Shamov B.A. Atopic dermatitis: clinical manifestations and treatment. Diary of the Kazan Medical School. 2014; 1 (4): 63–65.
Tognetti L., Martinelli C., Berti S. et al. Bacterial skin and soft tissue infections: review of the epidemiology, microbiology, aetiopathogenesis and treatment: a collaboration between dermatologists and infectivologists. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012; 26 (8): 931–941. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04416.x
Petry V., Bessa G.R., Poziomczyck C.S. et al. Bacterial skin colonization and infections in patients with atopic dermatitis. An Bras Dermatol. 2012; 87 (5): 729–734. doi: 10.1590/s0365-05962012000500010
Jung M.Y., Chung J.Y., Lee H.Y. et al. Antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus in atopic dermatitis: current prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Korea and treatment strategies. Ann Dermatol. 2015; 27 (4): 398–403. doi: 10.5021/ad.2015.27.4.398
Lübbe J. Secondary infections in patients with atopic dermatitis. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003; 4 (9): 641–654. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200304090-00006
Masyukova S.A., Gladko E.V., Tarasenko G.N. et al. Fusidic acid in the treatment of pyodermas and allergic dermatoses complicated by bacterial infection. Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii. 2007; 6: 54–57.
Dvoryankova E.V., Korsunskaya I.M., Zakharova A.B., Zhukovsky R.O. Atopic dermatitis complicated by secondary infection: treatment approaches. Effective Pharmacotherapy. 2011; 26: 74–76.
Larkova I.A. Effective therapy of atopic dermatitis in children complicated by secondary infection. Meditsinskiy sovet. 2016; 1: 162–167.
Matushevskaya E.V., Svirshchevskaya E.V. Atopic dermatitis in the practice of a dermatovenerologist: rational choice of therapy. Russian Medical Journal. 2013; 21 (8): 410–412.
Gong J.Q., Lin L., Lin T. et al. Skin colonization by Staphylococcus aureus in patients with eczema and atopic dermatitis and relevant combined topical therapy: a double-blind multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2006; 155 (4): 680–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07410.x
Lever R, Hadley K, Downey D, Mackie R. Staphylococcal colonization in atopic dermatitis and the effect of topical mupirocin therapy. Br J Dermatol. 1988; 119 (2): 189–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1988.tb03201.x
Albanova V. Topical treatment of atopic dermatitis. Vrach. 2006; 2: 76–78.
Batyrshina S.V., Khaertdinova L.A. The concept of local therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis. Practical Medicine. 2009; 35 (3): 41–45.
Vasenova V.Yu., Butov Yu.S. Use of Polcortolone TC for the treatment of pruritic dermatoses complicated by secondary infection. Russian Medical Journal. 2013; 21 (22): 1096–1098.
Skripkin Yu.K., Khamaganova I.V. Experience with Oxycort and Polcortolone TC aerosols in the treatment of allergic dermatoses complicated by pyoderma. Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii. 2004; 1: 42–43.
Ramsay C., Savoie J., Gilbert M. et al. The treatment of atopic dermatitis with topical fusidic acid and hydrocortisone acetate. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 1996; 7 (Suppl. 1): S15–22.
Kungurov N.V., Kokhan M.M., Keniksfest Yu.V., Kashcheeva Ya.V., Letaeva O.V., Kuklin I.A., Stukova E.I. Innovative combined topical agent in the treatment of complicated dermatoses: application experience. Lechaschiy Vrach. 2019; 5: 38–50.
Perlamutrov Yu.N., Olkhovskaya K.B., Lyapon A.O., Solntseva V.K. A new step towards drug control of atopic dermatitis. Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2019; 18 (3): 302–308. DOI 10.17116/klinderma201918031307
Kasatkin E.V., Givirovsky S.E., Pisarev V.V. et al. Comparative evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy and safety of Tetraderm® cream and Triderm® cream in patients with allergic dermatoses complicated by secondary infection. Consilium Medicum. 2021; 23 (8): 676–681. DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2021.8.201
Hjorth N., Schmidt H., Thomsen K. Fusidic acid plus betamethasone in infected or potentially infected eczema. Pharmatherapeutica 1985; 4 (2): 126–131.
Tarasova M.V., Marina T.V., Sorokina E.A. et al. The rationale for the use of combined topical glucocorticosteroids in the combination therapy of atopic dermatitis. Journal of Scientific Articles Health and Education in the 21st Century. 2008; 10 (3): 383.
Kubanova A.A., Proshutinskaya D.V., Tekucheva L.V., Avdienko I.N. An integrated approach to topical therapy in patients with atopic dermatitis. Vestnik dermatologii i venerologii. 2010; 1: 20–26.
Nenasheva N.M. Features of local (topical) therapy for atopic dermatitis complicated by infection. RMJ. 2015; 23 (19): 1159–1165.
Kungurov N.V., Keniksfest Yu.V., Kokhan M.M. et al. Combined topical therapy of complicated dermatoses. Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2005; 2: 33–37.
Korotkiy N.G., Tikhomirov A.A., Gamayunov B.N. Use of antibacterial and antifungal agents in the topical therapy of children with atopic dermatitis of varying severity complicated by secondary infection. Pediatric Pharmacology. 2007; 4 (2): 76–80.
Kravchenya S.S., Igonina I.A., Bakulev A.L. Combined topical therapy of atopic dermatitis. Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2011; 9 (1): 41–44;
Khamaganova I.V., Shekrota A.G., Nikiforova G.D. et al. Complex treatment of atopic dermatitis. Clinical Dermatology and Venereology. 2007; 3: 87–89.
Niebuhr M., Mai U., Kapp A., Werfel T. Antibiotic treatment of cutaneous infections with Staphylococcus aureus in patients with atopic dermatitis: current antimicrobial resistances and susceptibilities. Exp Dermatol. 2008; 17 (11): 953–957. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2008.00734.x
Boguniewicz M., Sampson H., Leung S. et al. Effects of cefuroxime axetil on Staphylococcus aureus colonizing and superantigen production in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2001; 108 (4): 651–652. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.118598
Treneva M.S., Pampura A.N. Strategy for the selection of antibacterial drugs in children with microbial infection of atopic dermatitis. Practical Medicine. 2011; 3 (51): 136–139.
Boguniewicz M., Leung D.Y. Recent insights into atopic dermatitis and implications for management of infectious complications. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010; 125 (1): 4–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.11.027
Wollenberg A. Eczema herpeticum. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2012; 96: 89–95. doi: 10.1159/000331892
Niimura M., Nishikawa T. Treatment of eczema herpeticum with oral acyclovir. Am J Med. 1988; 85 (2A): 49–52.
Penkina N. I. Analysis of the efficacy of antioxidant therapy in exacerbations of atopic dermatitis in children // PEM. 2005. No. 18-2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/analiz-effektivnosti-antioksidantnoy-terapii-pri-obostrenii-atopicheskogo-dermatita-u-detey.
Bussmann C., Bockenhoff A., Henke H. et al. Does allergen-specific immunotherapy represent a therapeutic option for patients with atopic dermatitis? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006; 118 (6): 1292–1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2006.07.054
Darsow U., Forer I., Ring J. Allergen-specific immunotherapy in atopic eczema. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2011; 11 (4): 277–283. doi: 10.1007/s11882-011-0194-7
Bae J.M., Choi Y.Y., Park C.O. et al. Efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013; 132 (1): 110–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.02.044
Ring J. Successful hyposensitization treatment in atopic eczema: results of a trial in monozygotic twins. Br J Dermatol. 1982; 107 (5): 597–602. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1982.tb00412.x
Glover M.T., Atherton D.J. A double-blind controlled trial of hyposensitization to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus in children with atopic eczema. Clin Exp Allergy. 1992; 22 (4): 440–446. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1992.tb00145.x
Zachariae H., Cramers M., Herlin T.et al. Non-specific immunotherapy and specific hyposensitization in severe atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1985; 114: 48–54. doi: 10.2340/000155551144854
Elisyutina O.G., Fedenko E.S. The place of specific immunotherapy in the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis complicated by recurrent pyoderma. Physiology and Pathology of the Immune System. Physiology and Pathology of the Immune System. 2006; (8): P. 15.
Novak N., BieberT., Hoffmann M. et al. Efficacy and safety of subcutaneous allergen-specific immunotherapy with depigmented polymerized mite extract in atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130 (4): 925– 931 e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.004
Pajno G.B., Caminiti L., Vita D. et al. Sublingual immunotherapy in mite-sensitized children with atopic dermatitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007; 120 (1): 164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.04.008
Qin Y.E., Mao J.R., Sang Y.C., Li W.X. Clinical efficacy and compliance of sublingual immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides farinae drops in patients with atopic dermatitis. Int J Dermatol. 2014; 53 (5): 650–655. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12302
Liu L., Guo D., Liang Q. et al. The efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy with Dermatophagoides farinae vaccine in a murine atopic dermatitis model. Clin Exp Allergy. 2015; 45 (4): 815–822. doi: 10.1111/cea.12417
Pritulo O.A., Prokhorov D.V., Zhumykina O.I., Ispiryan M.B. Dermatocurotology — an urgent direction of medical rehabilitation of the population of the Russian Federation taking into account the sanatorium-resort potential of the Republic of Crimea. Bulletin of Physiotherapy and Balneology. 2016; 22 (3): 49–51.
Tlish M.M. Innovations in the system of sanatorium-resort rehabilitation of patients with pruritic dermatoses. Bulletin of New Medical Technologies. 2011; 18 (4): 181–183.
Efimova A.S. On the issue of sanatorium-resort treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis in Crimea. Bulletin of Physiotherapy and Balneology. 2019; 1: 84–92.
Farina S., Gisondi P., Zanoni M. et al. Balneotherapy for atopic dermatitis in children at Comano spa in Trentino, Italy. J Dermatolog Treat. 2011; 22 (6): 366–371. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2010.512950
Huang A, Seité S, Adar T. The use of balneotherapy in dermatology. Clin Dermatol. 2018; 36 (3): 363–368. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2018.03.010
Lio P.A. Non-pharmacologic therapies for atopic dermatitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013; 13 (5): 528–538. doi: 10.1007/s11882-013-0371-y
Taieb C., Sibaud V., Merial-Kieny C. Impact of Avène hydrotherapy on the quality of life of atopic and psoriatic patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2011; 25 Suppl 1: 24–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2010.03899.x
Cacciapuoti S., Luciano M.A., Megna M. et al. The role of thermal water in chronic skin diseases management: A review of the literature. J Clin Med. 2020;9 (9): 3047. doi: 10.3390/jcm9093047
Nekipelova A.V., Vlasov V.G., Lunyova T.G. Possibilities of using nitrogen-siliceous thermal waters in the treatment of patients with chronic recurrent dermatoses in the Annenskie Vody specialized rehabilitation hospital. Far Eastern Healthcare. 2013. No. 2 (56): 51–57.
Nekipelova A.V. On the efficacy of balneotherapy in patients with chronic dermatoses. Pacific Medical Journal. 2014; 1: 56–58.
Kaznacheeva L.F., Messerova V.V., Kaznacheev K.S., Gerashchenko N.V. Clinical features of atopic dermatitis in children with the use of "dry" carbon dioxide baths. Mother and Child in Kuzbass. 2011; 2 (45): 17–20.
Pakhnova L.R., Samotrueva M.A., Bashkina O.A. et al. Peloidotherapy for skin diseases. Astrakhan Medical Journal. 2017; 12 (1): 8–21.
Manshina N.V., Sevryukova V.S., Solovyov A.M., Kuleshova L.M. [Spa and resort treatment of skin diseases]. Meditsinskiy sovet. 2008; 1–2: 67–75. (In Russ.)
Kapasakalidi D., Kovalchuk V., Reut V. Atopic dermatitis. Therapy and prevention. Rehabilitation features in sanatorium-resort settings. Vrach. 2015; 8: 51–55.
Roduit C., Frei R., Loss G. et al. Development of atopic dermatitis according to age of onset and association with early-life exposures. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012; 130 (1): 130–136 e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.043
Caut C., Leach M., Steel A. Dietary guideline adherence during preconception and pregnancy: A systematic review. Matern Child Nutr. 2020; 16 (2): e12916. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12916
Sugita K., Akdis C.A. Recent developments and advances in atopic dermatitis and food allergy. Allergol Int. 2020; 69 (2): 204–214. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2019.08.013
Perkin M.R., Logan K., Tseng A. et al. Randomized trial of introduction of allergenic foods in breast-fed infants. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374 (18): 1733–1743. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1514210
Prell C., Koletzko B. Breastfeeding and Complementary Feeding. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2016; 113 (25): 435–444. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2016.0435
Alexander D.D., Cabana M.D. Partially hydrolyzed 100% whey protein infant formula and reduced risk of atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010; 50 (4): 422–430. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181cea52b
Vandenplas Y., Al-Hussaini B., Al-Mannaei K. et al. Prevention of Allergic Sensitization and Treatment of Cow"s Milk Protein Allergy in Early Life: The Middle-East Step-Down Consensus. Nutrients. 2019 Jun 26; 11 (7): 1444. doi: 10.3390/nu11071444
Gruber C. Probiotics and prebiotics in allergy prevention and treatment: future prospects. Exp Rev Clin Immunol. 2012; 8 (1): 17 –19. doi: 10.1586/eci.11.74
Cuello-Garcia C.A., Brozek J.L., Fiocchi A. et al. Probiotics for the prevention of allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015; 136 (4): 952–961. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.04.031
Panduru M., Panduru N.M., Sălăvăstru C.M., Tiplica G.S. Probiotics and primary prevention of atopic dermatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015; 29 (2): 232–242. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12496
Muraro A., Halken S., Arshad S.H. et al. EAACI food allergy and anaphylaxis guidelines. Primary prevention of food allergy. Allergy. 2014; 69 (5): 590–601. doi: 10.1111/all.12398
Kantor R., Kim A., Thyssen J.P., Silverberg J.I. Association of atopic dermatitis with smoking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016; 75 (6): 1119–1125 e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.07.017
Kathuria P., Silverberg J.I. Association of pollution and climate with atopic eczema in US children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016; 27 (5): 478–485. doi: 10.1111/pai.12543
Morgenstern V., Zutavern A., Cyrys J. et al. Atopic diseases, allergic sensitization, and exposure to traffic-related air pollution in children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008; 177 (12): 1331–1337. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200701-036OC
Hidaka T., Ogawa E., Kobayashi E.H. et al. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor AhR links atopic dermatitis and air pollution via induction of the neurotrophic factor artemin. Nat Immunol. 2017; 18 (1): 64–73. doi: 10.1038/ni.3614
Fedenko E., Elisyutina O., Shtyrbul O. et al. Microarray-based IgE serology improves management of severe atopic dermatitis in two children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2016; 27 (6): 645–649. doi: 10.1111/pai.12572
Ricci G., Bendandi B., Aiazzi R.et al. Three years of Italian experience of an educational program for parents of young children affected by atopic dermatitis: improving knowledge produces lower anxiety levels in parents of children with atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2009; 26 (1): 1–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2008.00813.x
Staab D., Diepgen T.L., Fartasch M. et al. Age related, structured educational programmes for the management of atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2006; 332 (7547): 933–938. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7547.933
Lambert J., Bostoen J., Geusens B. et al. A novel multidisciplinary educational programme for patients with chronic skin diseases: Ghent pilot project and first results. Arch Dermatol Res. 2011; 303 (1): 57–63. doi: 10.1007/s00403-010-1082-z
Kupfer J., Gieler U., Diepgen T.L. et al. Structured education program improves the coping with atopic dermatitis in children and their parents-a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 2010; 68 (4):353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.014
Staab D., von Rueden U., Kehrt R. et al. Evaluation of a parental training program for the management of childhood atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2002; 13 (2): 84–90. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2002.01005.x
Kiriyama T., Sugiura H., Uehara M. Residual washing detergent in cotton clothes: a factor of winter deterioration of dry skin in atopic dermatitis. J Dermatol. 2003; 30 (10): 708–712. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2003.tb00463.x
Schmid-Wendtner M.H., Korting H.C. The pH of the skin surface and its impact on the barrier function. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2006; 19 (6): 296–302. doi: 10.1159/000094670
Simpson E., Trookman N.S., Rizer R.L. et al. Safety and tolerability of a body wash and moisturizer when applied to infants and toddlers with a history of atopic dermatitis: results from an open-label study. Pediatr Dermatol. 2012; 29 (5): 590–597. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2012.01809.x
Hon K.L., Leung T.F., Wong Y. et al. A survey of bathing and showering practices in children with atopic eczema. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2005; 30 (4): 351–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2005.01748.x
Wollenberg A., Vogel S., Renner E.D. [Vaccinations with atopic dermatitis and other chronic inflammatory skin diseases]. Hautarzt 2010; 61 (11): 985–993. doi: 10.1007/s00105-010-2019-3
Bath-Hextall F., Delamere F., Williams H. Dietary exclusions for improving established atopic eczema in adults and children systematic review. Allergy. 2009; 64 (2): 258–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01917.x
Electronic resource https://base.garant.ru/70647158/53f89421bbdaf741eb2d1ecc4ddb4c33/
Delyagin V.M., Urazbagambetov A. Use of Suprastinex (levocetirizine) in atopy in children and adolescents. Russian Medical Journal. Pediatrics. 2012; (16): 828–830.
Elisyutina O.G., Fedenko E.S., Fedoskova T.G., Luss L.V. Efficacy of levocetirizine therapy in patients with allergic dermatoses. Ross. Allergol. Zhurnal, 2012, 5: 69-75
Simons FE; Early Prevention of Asthma in Atopic Children (EPAAC) Study Group. Safety of levocetirizine treatment in young atopic children: An 18-month study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2007 Sep;18(6):535-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2007.00558.x. Epub 2007 Jun 11. PMID: 17561929].
Tamrazova O.B. Pathogenetic therapy in children suffering from severe forms of atopic dermatitis. Russian Medical Journal. Pediatrics. 2013; (2): 108–114. 83
Nazhmutdinova D.K., Shvets O.I. Levocetirizine: reboot. Russian Medical Journal. Dermatology. 2011; 21: 1324–1326.
Kamaev A.V., Trusova O.V., Kamaeva I.A. Pruritus in atopic dermatitis in children: known mechanisms and possibilities for its long-term control. Russian Medical Journal. 2015; 3: 142–146.
Fitzsimons R, van der Poel LA, Thornhill W, du Toit G, Shah N, Brough HA. Antihistamine use in children. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2015;100(3):122-131
Motola D, Donati M, Biagi C, et al. Safety profile of H1-antihistamines in pediatrics: an analysis based on data from VigiBase. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26(10):1164- 1171. doi:10.1002/pds.4246.
Wang V, Boguniewicz J, Boguniewicz M, Ong PY. The infectious complications of atopic dermatitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Jan;126(1):3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Aug 7. PMID: 32771354; PMCID: PMC7411503.
Brough H.A. et al. Epicutaneous sensitization in the development of food allergy: What is the evidence and how can this be prevented? // Allergy. 2020. Vol. 75, № 9. P. 2185–2205.
Gandhi N.A., Pirozzi G., Graham N.M.H. Commonality of the IL-4/IL-13 pathway in atopic diseases // Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2017. Vol. 13, № 5. P. 425–437.
Wollenberg A. et al. European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: part I - systemic therapy // J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. JEADV. 2022. Vol. 36, № 9. P. 1409–1431.
Reich K. et al. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib in combination with topical corticosteroids in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD Up): results from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial // The Lancet. 2021. Vol. 397, № 10290. P. 2169–2181.
Hou M. et al. Topical apigenin improves epidermal permeability barrier homoeostasis in normal murine skin by divergent mechanisms // Exp. Dermatol. 2013. Vol. 22, № 3. P. 210–215.
Otsuka A. et al. Possible new therapeutic strategy to regulate atopic dermatitis through upregulating filaggrin expression // J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014. Vol. 133, № 1. P. 139-146.e10.
Allergology and Immunology / ed. by L.S. Namazova-Baranova, A.A. Baranov, R.M. Khaitov et al. Moscow: Pediatrs 2020. Issue 4th ed., rev. and supp. 521 p.
Kudryavtseva A.V. et al. Systemic glucocorticosteroid treatment in children with severe atopic dermatitis. // Russian Forum "Pediatrics of St. Petersburg: Experience, Innovations, Achievements". 2010. P. 126, Namazova L.S., Voznesenskaya N.I., Mazitova L.P. Atopic dermatitis in children – problems and solutions. // Russian Medical Journal. 2006. No. 19. P. 1374/
Larkova I.A. Effective therapy of atopic dermatitis in children complicated by secondary infection. Meditsinskiy sovet. 2016; 1: 162–167.
Matushevskaya E.V., Svirshchevskaya E.V. Atopic dermatitis in the practice of a dermatovenerologist: rational choice of therapy. Russian Medical Journal. 2013; 21 (8): 410–412.
Gong J.Q., Lin L., Lin T. et al. Skin colonization by Staphylococcus aureus in patients with eczema and atopic dermatitis and relevant combined topical therapy: a double-blind multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2006; 155 (4): 680–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07410.x
Lever R, Hadley K, Downey D, Mackie R. Staphylococcal colonization in atopic dermatitis and the effect of topical mupirocin therapy. Br J Dermatol. 1988; 119 (2): 189–198. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1988.tb03201.x].
Hagenström K. et al. Prevalence and Medications of Atopic Dermatitis in Germany: Claims Data Analysis // Clin. Epidemiol. 2021. Vol. 13. P. 593–602.
Wollenberg A. et al. ETFAD/EADV Eczema task force 2020 position paper on diagnosis and treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults and children // J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2020. Vol. 34, № 12. P. 2717–2744, Wollenberg A. et al. European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema: part I - systemic therapy // J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. JEADV. 2022. Vol. 36, № 9. P. 1409–1431.
Maarouf M, Hendricks AJ, Shi VY. Bathing Additives for Atopic Dermatitis - A Systematic Review. Dermatitis. 2019 May/Jun;30(3):191-197
Yu.G. Levina, L.S. Namazova-Baranova, A.A. Alekseeva, E.A. Vishnyova, K.E. Efendieva, A.Yu. Tomilova. Clinical and pharmacological features of cetirizine in the treatment of allergic diseases in children. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kliniko-farmakologicheskie-osobennosti-primeneniya-tsetirizina-v-terapii-allergicheskih-bolezney-u-detey/viewer
N.V. Yukhtina. Modern concepts of atopic dermatitis in children. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-predstavleniya-ob-atopicheskom-dermatite-u-detey/viewer
S.A. Vostrikova, N.I. Penkina, M.A. Ivanova. Quality of follow-up care for children with atopic dermatitis from the onset of the disease to the age of 13–17 years. Practical Medicine, No. 7, 2022 https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kachestvo-dispansernogo-nablyudeniya-detey-s-atopicheskim-dermatitom-s-perioda-manifestatsii-zabolevaniya-do-vozrasta-13-17-let/viewer
M.M. Tlish, T.G. Kuznetsova. Medical and social issues in the management of patients with chronic dermatoses. Lechaschy Vrach No. 1/2019; Page numbers in issue: 77-81, https://www.lvrach.ru/2019/01/15437199
Treatment of bacterial skin infections in children. "Pediatrician's Practice Journal", May-June 2010, pp. 40-43, Korsunskaya, O.B. Tamrazova, I.L. Sorkina, Z.A. Nevozinskaya, CTP FHF RAS, City Clinical Hospital No. 14 https://medi.ru/info/11566/
Korsunskaya I.M. et al. Experience with cetirizine in the treatment of allergic dermatoses in children // Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii. – 2007. – Vol. 6. – No. 2. – P. 136-138.
Mazitova L.P. Modern approaches to the treatment of allergic skin diseases in children // Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii. – 2005. – Vol. 4. – No. 2. – P. 122-124.
Rational Pharmacotherapy of Skin Diseases and Sexually Transmitted Infections: A Guide for Practicing Physicians / under the general editorship of A.A. Kubanova, V.I. Kisina; M.: Littera, 2005; 882.
Penkina N.I. Analysis of the efficacy of antioxidant therapy in exacerbation of atopic dermatitis in children // Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. – 2005. – Vol. 5. – No. 18-2. – P. 36-37.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Kubanov Alexey Alekseevich – Academician of the RAS, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Director of the State Research Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology of the Russian Ministry of Health, President of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists, Moscow. No conflict of interest.
Namazova-Baranova Leyla Seymurovna – Academician of the RAS, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Faculty Pediatrics, Pediatric Faculty, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the Research Institute of Pediatrics and Child Health of the Central Clinical Hospital of the RAS of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Russia, President of the Union of Pediatricians of Russia, Moscow. No conflict of interest.
Volnukhin Vladimir Anatolyevich - Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Chief Researcher at the Department of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, Specialized Medical Care Department, Moscow Scientific and Practical Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, Member of the National Alliance of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists, Moscow. No conflict of interest.
Dvornikov Anton Sergeevich - Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists, Moscow. No conflict of interest.
Ilyina Nataliya Ivanovna – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director for Clinical Work, Chief Physician of the National Research Center Institute of Immunology of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Vice-President of the Russian Association of Allergologists and Clinical Immunologists, Moscow. No conflict of interest.
Zaslavsky Denis Vladimirovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Professor at the Department of Dermatovenereology, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists, Saint Petersburg. No conflict of interest.
Karamova Arfenya Eduardovna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Dermatology, State Research Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists, Moscow. No conflict of interest.
Martynov Andrey Aleksandrovich - Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology, Russian Academy of Medical Education of the Russian Ministry of Health, Leading Researcher at the Department of Dermatology, State Research Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists, Moscow. No conflict of interest.
Olisova Olga Yurievna - Corresponding Member of the RAS, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Rakhmanov Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists, Moscow. No conflict of interest.
Potekaev Nikolay Nikolaevich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Director of the Moscow Scientific and Practical Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology of the Moscow Healthcare Department, President of the National Alliance of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists, Moscow.
Selimzyanova Liliya Robertovna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Pediatrics and Pediatric Rheumatology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Union of Pediatricians of Russia, Moscow. No conflict of interest.
Khaitov Musa Rakhimovich - Corresponding Member of the RAS, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Director of the National Research Center Institute of Immunology of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, President of the Russian Association of Allergologists and Clinical Immunologists, Moscow. No conflict of interest.
Chikin Vadim Viktorovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Department of Dermatology, State Research Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists, Moscow. No conflict of interest.
Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
1. Medical specialists: dermatovenereologists, allergists-immunologists, pediatricians, general practitioners (family physicians), general internists.
2. Residents and trainees of continuing professional education cycles in the specified specialties.
Table 1. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | There is only a rationale for the mechanism of action or expert opinion |
Table 2. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for prevention, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | There is only a rationale for the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion |
Table 3. Scale for assessing the grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines
The clinical guidelines update mechanism provides for their systematic revision—at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based data regarding the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
These clinical guidelines were developed taking into account the following regulatory legal documents:
1. Procedure for the Provision of Medical Care in the Profile of "Dermatovenereology", approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 924n dated November 15, 2012.
2. Procedure for the Provision of Medical Care to the Population in the Profile of "Allergology and Immunology", approved by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 606n dated November 7, 2012
Classification of glucocorticoids used in dermatology
International nonproprietary name of glucocorticoids used in dermatology | Concentration |
Low-potency corticosteroids (Group I) | |
Hydrocortisone** | 0,5%, 1% |
Hydrocortisone | 0,1%,0,5%, 1% |
Moderate-potency corticosteroids (Group II) | |
Alclometasone | 0,05% |
Prednisolone** | 0,5% |
Fluocinolone acetonide | 0,025% |
Triamcinolone | 0,025% |
High-potency corticosteroids (Group III) | |
Betamethasone** | 0,05%, 0,1% |
Methylprednisolone aceponate | 0,1% |
Mometasone** | 0,1% |
Triamcinolone | 0,1% |
Fluticasone | 0,005%, 0,05% |
Very high-potency corticosteroids (Group IV) | |
Clobetasol | 0,05% |
Baseline screening before initiating cyclosporine** therapy
Before initiating cyclosporine** therapy, baseline screening must be performed, and a number of parameters must be monitored during treatment to timely detect potential adverse events [45].
Regular blood pressure monitoring is required during cyclosporine** treatment. If blood pressure rises, appropriate antihypertensive therapy should be administered.
Before initiating cyclosporine** treatment, the results of the following studies should be obtained:
− Complete blood count (CBC) with differential to monitor for potential blood and lymphatic system disorders (leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia);
− General general-practice blood biochemistry test to monitor renal function, liver status, and metabolism (blood urea test, blood creatinine test, blood aspartate aminotransferase activity assay, blood alanine aminotransferase activity assay, blood gamma-glutamyl transferase activity assay, blood potassium test, blood triglycerides test, blood cholesterol test, blood uric acid test).
− Determination of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in the blood;
− Determination of total IgM and IgG antibodies (anti-HCV IgG and anti-HCV IgM) to hepatitis C virus in the blood;
− Determination of IgM and IgG antibodies (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 in the blood;
− Determination of IgM and IgG antibodies (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 in the blood.
− Complete (clinical) urinalysis to monitor renal function.
To monitor therapy safety after 4 months of treatment with cyclosporine** and every 3 months thereafter, the following should be performed:
− Complete (clinical) blood count, differential;
− General general-practice blood biochemistry test to monitor renal function, liver status, and metabolism (blood urea test, blood creatinine test, blood aspartate aminotransferase activity assay, blood alanine aminotransferase activity assay, blood gamma-glutamyl transferase activity assay, blood potassium test, blood triglycerides test, blood cholesterol test, blood uric acid test).
− Complete (clinical) urinalysis to monitor renal function.
Baseline screening prior to initiating therapy with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, or upadacitinib**
Prior to initiating therapy with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, or upadacitinib**, patients with atopic dermatitis should undergo baseline screening followed by monitoring of a number of parameters to timely detect potential adverse events of therapy [45, 261].
Caution should be exercised when using abrocitinib, upadacitinib**, and baricitinib** in patients aged 65 years and older, current or past long-term smokers, patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases or other cardiovascular disease risk factors, patients with risk factors for malignancies, as well as patients with known risk factors for venous thromboembolism in addition to those listed above [261, 262]. Patients must be monitored for signs or symptoms of infection, and regular skin examinations should be performed in patients at elevated risk for skin cancer [261–263].
Prior to initiating therapy with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, or upadacitinib**, the results of the following tests should be obtained:
− Complete (clinical) blood count, differential, to monitor for potential hematologic and lymphatic system disorders (neutropenia, lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia). Therapy with abrocitinib, upadacitinib**, or baricitinib** should not be initiated in patients with an absolute lymphocyte count of less than 500 cells/mm3 and/or an absolute neutrophil count of less than 1000 cells/mm3 [263]. Therapy with upadacitinib** or baricitinib** should also not be initiated if the total blood hemoglobin level is below 8 g/dL.
− General general-practice blood biochemistry test to assess liver status and lipid metabolism (blood aspartate aminotransferase activity assay, blood alanine aminotransferase activity assay, blood triglycerides test, blood cholesterol test, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol test, blood phospholipids test, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol test).
− Complete (clinical) urinalysis to monitor renal function.
− Determination of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in the blood;
− Determination of total IgM and IgG antibodies (anti-HCV IgG and anti-HCV IgM) to hepatitis C virus in the blood;
− Consultation with an infectious disease specialist if a patient is diagnosed with hepatitis B or C to determine the feasibility of therapy with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, or upadacitinib**;
− Consultation with a phthisiatrician.
During therapy with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, or upadacitinib**, 4 weeks after initiating therapy and every 3 months thereafter, the following tests should be performed to monitor potential adverse events of therapy:
− Complete (clinical) blood count, differential. Therapy with abrocitinib, upadacitinib**, or baricitinib** should be discontinued if the neutrophil count is less than 1x109 cells/L and/or the lymphocyte count is less than 0.5x109 cells/L. Therapy with upadacitinib** or baricitinib** should be discontinued if the total blood hemoglobin level drops below 8 g/dL. Treatment may be resumed when the neutrophil count, lymphocyte count, and/or total blood hemoglobin level exceed these values.
− General general-practice blood biochemistry test to assess liver status and lipid metabolism (blood aspartate aminotransferase activity assay, blood alanine aminotransferase activity assay, blood triglycerides test, blood cholesterol test, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol test, blood phospholipids test, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol test). If drug-induced liver injury is suspected based on the results of blood aspartate aminotransferase activity and blood alanine aminotransferase activity assays, treatment with baricitinib** or upadacitinib** should be discontinued.
During therapy with abrocitinib, baricitinib**, or upadacitinib**, patients must be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of tuberculosis, including patients with a negative test result for latent tuberculosis prior to initiating therapy.
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix C. Patient Information
Given that atopic dermatitis is a chronic disease, regular baseline therapy with moisturizing and emollient topical agents is necessary to prevent relapses.
To avoid side effects, self-administration and uncontrolled use of topical corticosteroids should be avoided.
Given that atopic dermatitis is a chronic disease, regular skin care is required to prevent relapses:
Daily water procedures using soap-free medical cosmetics — shower gels and oils;
Daily application of emollient to damp skin immediately after bathing at least twice a day;
Keep fingernails trimmed regularly;
Follow the physician's recommendations regarding topical therapy medications;
Regularly wash clothing, towels, and bed linens in water with detergent before reuse;
If sensitization to house dust mites is confirmed, use acaricidal agents when washing;
Do not keep carpets in the room;
Store books in closed cabinets;
Soft toys should be washed regularly;
Treat mold-covered surfaces with specialized products;
Clean air conditioner filters at least once every 2 weeks;
Avoid keeping indoor potted plants;
Vacuum regularly and perform daily wet cleaning of the room;
If sensitization to furry animal allergens is confirmed, cease contact with them;
Do not use feather- or down-filled pillows and blankets. Pillows should be made of synthetic fibers that are easy to wash;
To avoid adverse effects, self-administration and uncontrolled use of topical treatments (corticosteroids, topical calcineurin inhibitors, antibacterial, antifungal, and antiviral drugs) should be avoided.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) of Disease Severity
Original name: Investigator’s global assessment (IGA).
Source (official developer website, validation publication): https://www.eczemacouncil.org/research/investigator-global-assessment-scale/
Type (underline):
- rating scale
- index
- questionnaire
- other (specify): -
Purpose: assessment of the overall severity of atopic dermatitis
Content (template):
Points | Category | Description* |
|---|---|---|
0 | Clear skin | Atopic dermatitis signs have completely cleared, except for residual depigmentation lesions (post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation and/or hypopigmentation). |
1 | Almost clear skin | Atopic dermatitis signs have not completely cleared overall, and remaining lesions consist of pale pink (excluding post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation) and/or barely palpable firm areas of skin thickening and/or papules and/or barely palpable areas of lichenification, excoriations; exudation/crusting is absent. |
2 | Mild | Atopic dermatitis signs overall present as light red lesions; with minor yet distinct firm areas of skin thickening and/or papules with minor yet distinct linear or interrupted scratch marks or penetrating superficial lesions; with minor yet distinct skin thickening, fine skin markings, and fine lamellar lichenoid scaling; exudation/crusting is absent. |
3 | Moderate severity | Atopic dermatitis signs overall present as red lesions; with moderately pronounced firm areas of skin thickening and/or papules easily palpable; with moderate linear or interrupted scratch marks or penetrating superficial lesions; with moderate skin thickening, coarse skin markings, and coarse lamellar lichenoid scaling; with minor exudation/crusting. |
4 | Severe | The manifestations of atopic dermatitis generally present as deep dark-red lesions with pronounced hard areas of skin thickening and/abling papules; with marked linear or intermittent scratch marks or penetrating superficial lesions; with pronounced skin thickening featuring very coarse skin markings and large-flaking lichenoid scaling; with moderate to severe exudation/crust formation. |
*The scalp, palms, and soles are excluded from the IGA scoring. | ||
The IGA score is used to assess the severity of atopic dermatitis. It evaluates the severity of atopic dermatitis at the time of assessment.
Key: Skin lesions are assessed visually and by palpation. IGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 to 4 that reflects the severity of erythema, skin thickening (induration), and scaling. A score of 0 corresponds to clear skin, while the maximum score of 4 corresponds to severe atopic dermatitis.
Appendix G2. SCORAD Index
The SCORAD index is designed to assess the severity of atopic dermatitis.
Original title: Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD).
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Consensus report of the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis. Severity of scoring of atopic dermatitis: the SCORAD index. Dermatology.1993; 186: 23–31.
Type (underline):
- rating scale
- index
- questionnaire
- other (specify): -
Purpose: assessment of the severity of atopic dermatitis.
Content (template):



SCORAD provides a scoring system for six objective symptoms: erythema, edema/papular elements, crusts/oozing, excoriations, lichenification/scaling, and skin dryness. The intensity of each sign is evaluated on a 4-level scale: 0 – none, 1 – mild, 2 – moderate, 3 – severe. When assessing the body surface area affected, the 'rule of nines' should be used, where the unit of measurement is the patient's palm surface area, equivalent to one percent of the total skin surface. The numbers indicate the surface area values for patients older than 2 years, and those in parentheses are for children under 2 years of age (Fig. 1). Subjective symptoms (itching sensation, sleep disturbance) are assessed in children older than 7 years and adults; in younger children, subjective symptoms are assessed with the help of parents, to whom the assessment principle is explained beforehand.
The SCORAD index is calculated using the formula: SCORAD = A/5 + 7B/2 + C,
where: A is the extent of skin lesions,
B is the sum of the intensity levels of clinical symptoms of atopic dermatitis,
C is the sum of subjective symptom scores on a visual analogue scale.
On the ruler at the bottom of the figure, a point is marked corresponding to the severity of the assessed subjective sign, averaged over the last 3 days.
Index values can range from 0 (no disease) to 103 (maximum severity of atopic dermatitis).
Mild atopic dermatitis corresponds to a SCORAD value < 25.
Moderate atopic dermatitis corresponds to a SCORAD value from 25 to 50.
Severe atopic dermatitis corresponds to a SCORAD value > 50.