Williams syndrome: clinical guidelines

Applies toadults, children2026 editionQ93.8

Clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults, children. 2026 revision, ICD-10 codes: Q93.8.

Receive research articles on "Williams syndrome"Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in Russian, with figures, sample size, and conclusion. Plus updates in Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary of the guideline text, 2026 edition. Each point links to the original section — verify with it before prescribing.

Williams syndrome is a congenital multisystem disorder caused by a heterozygous microdeletion at 7q11.23; cardiovascular, endocrine, neurocognitive, and behavioral abnormalities are typical. The guideline focuses on diagnosis confirmation, organ damage assessment, and long-term multidisciplinary follow-up of children and adults.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Suspend the syndrome upon a combination of characteristic facial features, supravalvular aortic stenosis or other vascular pathology, growth retardation, intellectual and behavioral features, and endocrine disorders; collect history regarding feeding, vomiting, constipation, hypercalcemia, and early puberty. → in the text
  2. During the physical examination, assess height and body weight, measure blood pressure on all four limbs, check for joint hypermobility and spinal deformities, as well as behavioral and visuospatial cognitive impairments. → in the text
  3. Confirm the diagnosis by detecting a heterozygous deletion of the critical 7q11.23 region using molecular genetic or molecular cytogenetic methods. MLPA is rational to use as the first line: LOR C, LOE 4; FISH has LOR A, LOE 1 and can be the first line if MLPA is unavailable. → in the text
  4. If the FISH result is negative, perform MLPA; standard karyotyping does not confirm the syndrome. A negative DNA diagnosis result does not entirely exclude the syndrome; therefore, the diagnostic strategy and result interpretation must be determined by a clinical geneticist. → in the text
  5. During initial diagnosis, test for total blood calcium, glucose, lipid profile, glycated hemoglobin, urea and creatinine, TSH, free T3 and free T4, urinalysis, urine calcium-to-creatinine ratio, urine creatinine, and 25-OH vitamin D. → in the text
  6. Perform an ECG with mandatory QTc evaluation, echocardiography, Holter monitoring, audiometry, thyroid and parathyroid ultrasound, and renal ultrasound; in severe supravalvular aortic stenosis, perform CT angiography of the aorta and/or cardiac and great vessel MRI. → in the text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

How is Williams syndrome confirmed?

The diagnosis is confirmed by detecting a heterozygous deletion in the critical 7q11.23 region. For this purpose, MLPA, FISH, chromosomal microarray analysis, or whole-genome sequencing are used; standard karyotyping is not suitable for confirmation. → in the text

Which genetic test should be chosen first?

MLPA is rational to use as the first line of diagnostics; if FISH is negative, MLPA is also performed. FISH can be the first method if MLPA is unavailable. The diagnostic strategy is determined by a geneticist. → in the text

How often should calcium be monitored in Williams syndrome?

Total calcium is tested at diagnosis and every 4–6 months up to age two, then annually. Urinary calcium and the calcium-to-creatinine ratio are monitored annually at the same time; vitamin D overdose should be avoided. → in the text

What is important to check before surgery?

Before any surgical intervention, an ECG with mandatory QTc measurement and an assessment of risk factors for sudden cardiac death, including QTc-prolonging drugs, are necessary. A consultation with a pediatric cardiologist or cardiologist is also required. → in the text

How is Williams syndrome inherited?

Most deletions occur de novo, but inheritance is autosomal dominant. If one parent is a carrier, the risk for each sibling is 50%; the risk for the patient's offspring is also 50% for each pregnancy. → in the text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
1074, revision 1 (ID 1074_1)
Publication date
September 18, 2026
Age category
adults, children
ICD-10 codes
Q93.8
Specialties
Medical genetics
Developers
Association of Medical Geneticists
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Rubricator — 1074_1

List of Abbreviations

DNA — deoxyribonucleic acid

WS — Williams syndrome

DM — diabetes mellitus

EchoCG — echocardiography

GI — gastrointestinal tract

MCD — major congenital defect

CHD — congenital heart defect

MRI — magnetic resonance imaging

Mb — megabase

US — ultrasound

CMA — chromosomal microarray analysis

MLPA — multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

FISH — fluorescence in situ hybridization

** — the drug is included in the list of vital and essential drugs (Order of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2406-r dated October 12, 2019 (as amended on December 23, 2021) "On approval of the list of vital and essential drugs, as well as lists of medicinal products for medical use and the minimum assortment of medicinal products necessary for the provision of medical care")

# — off-label use, i.e., outside the indications registered in the drug's instructions, is carried out by decision of the medical commission, with the permission of the Local Ethics Committee of the medical organization (if any), subject to the signed informed consent of the parents (legal representative) and the patient over 15 years of age

*** — a medical device implanted into the human body during the provision of medical care within the framework of the state guarantee program for the free provision of medical care to citizens

Terms and Definitions

Syndrome — a set of symptoms sharing a common etiology and pathogenesis

Megabase — a unit of DNA fragment length equal to 1 million nucleotides

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Williams syndrome (WS) — a multiple congenital malformation syndrome comprising characteristic features such as cardiovascular system lesions (typically supravalvular aortic stenosis, peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis, elastin arteriopathy), a distinct phenotype (the so-called "elfin facies"), intellectual disability (usually mild), behavioral features (typically a friendly disposition, social communication impairments, and a characteristic neuropsychological profile), short stature, and endocrine pathology (hypercalcemia, carbohydrate metabolism disorders, hypothyroidism, and early puberty are characteristic). Dental enamel and growth defects, full lips, and a hoarse voice are also common features [1-3]. It should be noted that the combination of symptoms in each individual patient may vary and is not necessarily complete; no single clinical symptom is obligate, and the syndrome is suspected precisely on the basis of the combination of characteristic clinical manifestations.

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

The disease occurs predominantly sporadically. The cause of WS is a heterozygous deletion of 1.5 to 1.8 megabases (Mb) on chromosome 7q11.23, which includes 26-28 genes.

To date, the contribution of several of these genes to the formation of the WS phenotype is known in more detail [3]:

  • ELN — cardiovascular pathology;

  • LIMK1 — impairment of visual-spatial cognitive abilities;

  • GTF2I — reduced intelligence, impaired social communication ability;

  • STX1A — involved in neurotransmitter release and insulin secretion, may play a role in the development of diabetes in WS;

  • BAZ1B — the protein product of the gene binds the vitamin D receptor, likely contributing to the development of hypercalcemia in WS;

  • CLIP2 — the gene is hypothesized to be involved in cerebellar dysfunction in WS;

  • GTF2IRD1 — associated with craniofacial phenotypic features;

  • NCF1 — associated with a reduced risk of hypertension.

The role of other genes in the development of the WS phenotype continues to be studied.

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

The prevalence of Williams syndrome is estimated at 1:10,000 newborns; in Norway, the prevalence is 1:7,500 newborns. Both sexes and all ethnic groups are affected equally [3, 7, 15].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

ICD-10: Q93.8 — Other deletions of autosomes.

ICD-11: LD44.70 — Chromosome 7 deletions.

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

No.

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

Early development. Infants are restless; a weak sucking reflex, frequent vomiting, constipation, and abdominal pain may be noted. Physical developmental delay is observed, with a growth rate of approximately 75% of normal, remaining at this level throughout the child's development period [33]. The final height of an adult patient with WS is typically below the third percentile, corresponding to a height SDS of less than -2. In the first year of life, poor weight gain is associated with feeding difficulties, sucking and swallowing disorders. Prolonged intestinal colic may develop as a result of gastroesophageal reflux, chronic constipation, and/or idiopathic hypercalcemia. Infants with WS are hypotonic and often exhibit joint hypermobility, which together lead to motor developmental delay. Independent walking begins before 24 months of age. There may be speech development delay [8].

The so-called "elfin facies" is a historically established definition of the external phenotypic features of WS patients. Upon examination at any age, the following features are noteworthy: broad forehead, periorbital eyelid puffiness, "starburst" iris pattern, blue eyes, fan-like hair growth at the inner edge of the eyebrows, depressed nasal bridge, short nose with a broad, flattened, and somewhat upturned tip, long philtrum, wide mouth, full lips, mandibular micrognathia, malocclusion, and large earlobes. Epicanthic folds, full cheeks, and small, widely spaced teeth are more obvious in early childhood; adult patients have a subjectively "gaunt" appearance, primarily due to a visually elongated face and neck, and pronounced sloping shoulders. Joint hypermobility, hyperlordosis, and scoliosis may be observed [3, 15].

Personality features. Patients with WS are very friendly, empathetic, socially active, and anxious. They have a "...good-natured disposition — they love everyone, are loved by everyone, and are very charming" [44]. Adaptive behavior does not correlate with intelligence level and turns out to be lower than expected in both children and adults [3], which negatively affects the ability of adults with WS to function independently.

Intellectual development. Most patients with WS have some degree of intellectual disability, which can range from mild to profound. In most cases (75%), a mild degree of intellectual disability is observed, with an average IQ of about 55. Overall, IQ ranges from 40 to 100; some patients have an IQ within the normal range [3]. No gender differences in intellectual abilities have been found [38].

Features of cognitive functions. Patients with WS have well-developed short-term verbal memory and speech, while simultaneously exhibiting visuospatial or constructive apraxia. Typically, children with WS score higher on verbal subtests than on tests measuring visuospatial constructive praxis [39, 45]. The cognitive profile in WS does not depend on the IQ level [3].

Learning abilities. Patients with WS master middle school-level reading skills relatively well, although the level of academic skills varies greatly. Reading skills correlate with cognitive abilities rather than language skills. Major difficulties arise with writing, drawing, and mathematics. Many adults with WS are capable of performing simple arithmetic operations [46].

Comorbid psychiatric and behavioral disorders. Difficulties with sensory modulation/sensory processing (e.g., intolerance to loud sounds), difficulties with emotional regulation, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and specific phobias are found in 80% of patients with WS [3].

Some children with WS exhibit symptoms characteristic of autism spectrum disorder, such as restricted interests and repetitive behaviors [41].

In children with WS, attention deficit disorder occurs in 65% of cases, and anxiety disorder in 57% (usually specific phobias) [47].

Anxiety disorders are observed throughout life; longitudinal studies of anxiety indicate its prevalence in individuals with WS to be 80% [48]. The likelihood of phobic disorders correlates with a lower intellectual level and more pronounced behavioral difficulties [49, 50].

Sleep disorders. Sleep problems are observed in 65% of people and include difficulty falling asleep and reduced sleep quality (restless, interrupted sleep, prolongation of slow-wave sleep) [9].

Cardiovascular system. The most common problems are supravalvular aortic stenosis, which may worsen over time. If left untreated, it can lead to increased pressure in the left ventricle, its hypertrophy, and the development of heart failure [3, 11]. Other common problems include pulmonary artery branch stenosis, ventricular and atrial septal defects, renal artery stenosis, and aortic hypoplasia. Arterial hypertension, including secondary to renal artery stenosis, occurs in 40–50% of patients with WS and can manifest at any age. QT interval prolongation has been reported in 13.6% [3, 12, 18].

Sense organs. Hearing loss is detected in 63% of children and 92% of adults, and in about half of the cases, it is caused by progressive sensorineural hearing loss. Subclinical hearing impairments are widespread. Chronic otitis media and hypersensitivity to loud sounds are frequently observed [3, 13].

Most patients with WS have a husky or low-pitched voice, likely due to elastin deficiency leading to vocal cord anomalies. Malocclusion, dental enamel hypoplasia, hypodontia, and microdontia are also common problems [3].

Endocrine system. Short stature (height SDS less than -2) and early puberty are observed in the majority of patients with WS; some patients are diagnosed in childhood with primary hypothyroidism, carbohydrate metabolism disorders (impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus), as well as idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia occurs in 15–50% of patients with WS, most prominently manifesting in the first two years of life (can lead to frequent constipation and vomiting, muscle cramps, irritability) [3, 14, 18].

Disease course. In most adult patients, symptoms progress: arterial hypertension, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, frequent recurrent urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal diseases (chronic constipation, cholelithiasis) develop. Despite reports that some patients are able to lead an independent lifestyle, full independence is usually not achieved in most cases. Patients with WS continue to live either with their parents or in specialized facilities where constant care can be provided [3, 15].

Genotype-phenotype correlations. Large deletions in the WS critical region range in size from 1.5 Mb (90-95% of cases) to 1.84 Mb (5-10% of WS patients). A more severe phenotype with greater cognitive impairment is observed in individuals with larger deletions (2–4 Mb or more) compared to those with the standard deletion (1.5–1.8 Mb). Individuals with smaller deletions generally have a variable phenotype and may lack intellectual disability, but exhibit similar behavioral features. Penetrance is 100% [3].

Differential diagnosis (see Appendix A3.1). WS should be differentiated from other syndromes characterized by short stature, developmental delay, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, facial features, and/or congenital heart disease. Primarily, these include: Noonan syndrome, 22q11.2 deletion (DiGeorge syndrome), Smith-Magenis syndrome, Kabuki syndrome, fetal alcohol syndrome. Individuals with supravalvular aortic stenosis should be evaluated to rule out WS [3].

For the main symptoms observed in WS patients at different ages, see Appendix A3.2 [33].

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

Diagnostic criteria.

The diagnosis is considered confirmed if a heterozygous deletion in the 7q11.23 critical region is detected by molecular genetic or molecular cytogenetic methods. The spectrum of clinical symptoms in patients may vary, and no single sign is obligate.

Please note that in accordance with the requirements for the development of clinical guidelines, each recommendation statement must indicate the strength of recommendations and the evidence base in accordance with the grading scales for the levels of evidentiary certainty (LEC) and the levels of recommendation persuasiveness (LRP). For many statements, the LRP and LEC will be low due to the lack of high-design clinical trials dedicated to them. Despite this, they are necessary elements of patient examination to establish a diagnosis and choose treatment tactics.

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

When collecting anamnesis and complaints, attention should be paid to:

  • cardiovascular system involvement — supravalvular aortic stenosis is the most significant condition, occurring in 75% of WS patients; peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis is generally more characteristic of infants;

  • characteristic phenotypic features — "elfin facies";

  • signs of connective tissue dysplasia (husky voice, inguinal or umbilical hernias, joint hypermobility, soft "velvety" skin);

  • intellectual deficit of varying severity;

  • behavioral features (hyper-sociability, anxiety, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder);

  • growth retardation;

  • endocrine system pathology (idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia, early puberty, carbohydrate metabolism disorders) [3, 8, 10, 12-14, 36, 58-62].

2.2 Physical Examination

Physical examination of patients with suspected WS:

  • assessment of physical development — anthropometric measurements (height measurement, weight measurement);

  • cardiovascular system examination: blood pressure measurement (on all four extremities);

  • osteoarticular system examination: detection of joint hypermobility and spinal deformities (lordosis, kyphosis, scoliosis);

  • assessment of behavioral disorders (hyper-sociability, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorders, autistic manifestations);

  • assessment of cognitive functions: detection of visuospatial perception disorders [3, 8, 10, 28, 36, 58, 63].

Detailed physical examination findings are described in the "Clinical Presentation" section.

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

It is recommended to determine structural gene variants in another or unspecified biological material sample, unclassified in other categories, using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in all patients with suspected WS to confirm the diagnosis at the molecular genetic level [3, 36, 64-69].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

Comments: a search for deletions in the 7q11.23 region is required. The MLPA method is more widespread and versatile for WS diagnostics; however, high-design clinical studies specifically dedicated to WS diagnostics have not been conducted. Despite this, it is rational to consider this method as the first-line diagnostic option. It is important to understand that negative DNA diagnostics results do not rule out WS itself or the hereditary nature of the disease in general. Only a medical geneticist can determine the tactics of DNA diagnostics and interpret its results. An initial and follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) with a medical geneticist is required.

It is recommended to determine structural gene variants in another or unspecified biological material sample, unclassified in other categories, using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) in patients with suspected WS who have negative FISH diagnostic results, to confirm the diagnosis at the molecular genetic level [36].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

Comments: in case of negative FISH diagnostic results, testing by the MLPA method is performed. In case of negative MLPA test results, performing diagnostics by the FISH method is impractical. Only a medical geneticist can determine the tactics of DNA diagnostics and interpret its results. An initial and follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) with a medical geneticist is required.

It is recommended to perform a molecular cytogenetic study (FISH method) for one pair of chromosomes in all patients with suspected WS to confirm the diagnosis at the molecular genetic level [3, 34].

Level of Recommendation ALevel of Evidence 1Level of Recommendation A (level of evidence – 1)

Comment: a search for deletions in the 7q11.23 region is required. FISH testing as a first-line option is possible if the MLPA method is unavailable. The diagnosis can be established through molecular genetic methods (MLPA method, in the nomenclature of medical services: "determination of structural gene variants in another or unspecified biological material sample, unclassified in other categories, by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification"), molecular cytogenetic methods (FISH method, in the nomenclature of medical services: "molecular cytogenetic study (FISH method) for one pair of chromosomes"; or CMA, in the nomenclature of medical services: "molecular karyotyping on DNA microarrays") or whole genome sequencing, in the nomenclature of medical services: "determination of gene variants in another or unspecified biological material sample, unclassified in other categories, by high-throughput sequencing"). The MLPA method is rational to consider as the first line of diagnostics or in case of negative FISH diagnostic results. WS cannot be confirmed by standard cytogenetic examination (karyotyping).

It is important to understand that negative DNA diagnostics results do not rule out WS itself or the hereditary nature of the disease in general. Only a medical geneticist can determine the tactics of DNA diagnostics and interpret its results. An initial and follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) with a medical geneticist is required.

It is recommended to test the blood total calcium level in all WS patients to detect hypercalcemia [20, 34, 70-72].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: hypercalcemia is one of the frequent conditions in patients with WS.

The study is performed at initial diagnosis and then dynamically every 4-6 months up to 2 years of age, and annually thereafter [3]. If necessary, testing for blood levels of phosphorus and ionized calcium is also performed.

It is recommended to perform a general clinical blood biochemistry test (levels of glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood) and glycated hemoglobin blood test for all patients with WS to detect metabolic disorders and provide timely condition correction [20, 21, 73]. Blood urea and creatinine tests are also necessary to assess renal function [3, 74].

GCR BLOC 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

Comment: monitoring of these parameters is necessary due to impaired glucose and lipid metabolism, and the frequent development of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus in patients with WS. These tests are performed at the initial diagnosis and thereafter dynamically at least once a year.

It is recommended to test the levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (fT3) in the blood, and free thyroxine (fT4) in blood serum for all patients with WS to assess and monitor thyroid function [22, 23, 24]

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: regular monitoring of thyroid functional activity is necessary due to the high prevalence of morphological anomalies of the thyroid structure (hypoplasia, ectopia, hemiagenesis), which are frequently accompanied by subclinical or overt hypothyroidism. The tests are performed at the time of diagnosis and subsequently on a regular basis for all patients annually up to 3 years of age, and then on average once every 2 years [3].

It is recommended to perform a general (clinical) urinalysis for all patients with WS to assess the state of the urinary system [16, 17, 18].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: monitoring of these parameters is necessary due to the high prevalence of urination disorders, lower urinary tract infections, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and arterial hypertension in patients with WS. The test is performed at the time of diagnosis and subsequently on a regular basis for all patients at least once a year [3].

It is recommended to test the level of calcium in urine and determine the calcium-to-creatinine ratio in a single portion of urine for all patients with WS for the early detection and correction of hypercalciuria [19, 34, 71].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: determining the calcium-to-creatinine ratio in a single portion of urine is a more accurate method for diagnosing urinary calcium excretion (see Appendix). Patients with WS must avoid vitamin D overdose, as it can further increase intestinal calcium absorption [3, 18, 19, 33]. The test is performed at the time of diagnosis and subsequently on a regular basis for all patients at least once a year [3].

It is recommended to test the level of creatinine in urine for all patients with WS at the time of diagnosis to assess the state of the urinary system [3, 16, 17, 37, 72].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: monitoring of these parameters is necessary due to the high prevalence of urination disorders, lower urinary tract infections, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and arterial hypertension in patients with WS. Patients also need to have their glomerular filtration rate calculated based on blood creatinine levels [37]. The test is performed at the time of diagnosis and subsequently on a regular basis for all patients at least once a year [3].

It is recommended to test the level of 25-OH vitamin D in the blood for all patients with WS at the time of diagnosis for the medical correction of vitamin D deficiency if necessary [20, 32, 72].

GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: patients with WS must maintain an adequate vitamin D level while avoiding overdose. If vitamin D deficiency is suspected, it is important to check the vitamin D level before initiating therapy. Blood calcium levels must be monitored throughout the course of treatment [3, 20, 32].

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram for all patients with WS to assess the state of the cardiovascular system [27, 75-78].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: measurement of the QT interval is mandatory. Various cardiovascular pathologies occur in 80% of patients with WS and are the leading causes of death. The most frequent ECG findings are left and right ventricular myocardial hypertrophy and QT interval prolongation (QTc). QTc is associated with a high risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, and a high rate of perioperative mortality; therefore, an electrocardiogram must be recorded before any surgical intervention. It is also necessary to assess all risk factors for sudden cardiac death, including the use of medications that contribute to QTc prolongation, especially before starting drugs used for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ATC: N06B, Psychostimulants, agents used for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [ADHD] and nootropics) [26, 27]. The test is performed at the time of diagnosis and subsequently at every visit to a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist, as well as before any surgical intervention [3].

It is recommended to perform echocardiography for all patients with WS to assess and monitor the state of the cardiovascular system [3, 35, 75, 76, 78-80].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: echocardiography is used for quantitative assessment of heart chamber dimensions, the severity of myocardial hypertrophy, aortic and mitral valve anomalies, cardiac septal defects, and tetralogy of Fallot. The test is performed at the time of diagnosis and subsequently on a regular basis annually until the age of 5, and then as needed, depending on the presence and severity of cardiovascular involvement [3].

It is recommended to perform Holter electrocardiographic monitoring for all patients with WS to evaluate and subsequently monitor the state of the cardiac conduction system and heart rhythm, and to analyze QTc [3, 35, 78, 81, 82].

LoE 3Level of recommendation grade for children B (level of evidence – 3), for adults C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: the test is necessitated by the need for status monitoring due to the high risk of sudden cardiac death associated with a prolonged QTc interval. It is important to remember that a number of drugs that may be used in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, as well as in the perioperative period, including for anesthesia, lead to QTc interval prolongation [28]. The test is performed at the time of diagnosis and subsequently on a regular basis annually up to 5 years of age, and then once every 2 years [3].

It is recommended to perform audiometry for all patients with WS to detect hearing impairments [29, 30, 33].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: annual audiological examination is recommended for children. Adults require an audiological examination at the age of 30, followed by repeat examinations every 3 years.

It is recommended to perform ultrasound examination of the thyroid gland and parathyroid glands for all patients with WS to identify developmental anomalies of the thyroid gland [23, 24].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: developmental anomalies (hypoplasia, ectopia, hemiagenesis) of the thyroid gland can be detected in patients with WS. The test is performed at the time of diagnosis and subsequently on a regular basis at least once a year [3].

It is recommended to perform a renal ultrasound for all patients with WS to identify structural renal anomalies and renal artery stenosis [3, 19, 27, 37, 84].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: structural developmental anomalies of the kidneys may be detected; performing a renal ultrasound is particularly important in the presence of arterial hypertension to timely identify renal artery stenosis. The test is performed at the time of diagnosis and subsequently at least once every 5 years or more frequently (if necessary) [3].

It is recommended to perform computed tomography angiography of the aorta and/or magnetic resonance imaging of the heart and great vessels for all patients with WS in the presence of severe supravalvular aortic stenosis to clarify the severity of the lesion [3, 27, 28, 85-88].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

2.5 Other Procedures

Specialist consultations may be provided to patients at various stages of medical care, including during the disease diagnosis period.

It is recommended to have an initial and follow-up (as needed) consultation (examination) by a medical geneticist for all patients with clinical signs of WS to perform differential diagnosis, determine the strategy for DNA diagnostics, and interpret the obtained results [3, 64-69, 89, 90].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: for the range of differential diagnostic search, see Appendix A3.1. Medical genetic counseling is the process of providing the proband, their family, or legal guardians with information about the etiology, mode of inheritance of the disease, and the consequences of genetic defects to help the family organize further follow-up, proper child care, rehabilitation, and social adaptation. Medical genetic counseling is also important for clarifying the genetic status of other family members, which is necessary for future reproductive planning and discussing the potential option of prenatal genetic testing.

WS is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner; most deletions arise de novo, although cases of parent-to-child transmission have been reported. In most cases, the proband's parents are unaffected. In the absence of clinical signs of WS in the parents, screening for the 7q11.23 microdeletion identified in the proband is considered impractical. The risk for the proband's siblings depends on the parental status. If one parent is affected, the risk for each sibling to inherit the 7q11.23 microdeletion is 50%. If the parents are unaffected, the risk for siblings is generally low, but higher than the general population risk due to the inability to rule out parental gonadal mosaicism. For the proband's offspring, the theoretical risk of having an affected child is 50% for each pregnancy, regardless of the sex of the unborn child. The optimal time for determining genetic risk and discussing prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is prior to pregnancy.

It is recommended that all patients with a confirmed diagnosis, as well as their family members and/or legal representatives, undergo a follow-up consultation (examination, interview) with a medical geneticist to interpret the results of genetic testing and receive medical genetic counseling [3, 64-69, 89].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: WS is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner; most deletions arise de novo, although cases of parent-to-child transmission have been reported. In most cases, the proband's parents are unaffected. In the absence of clinical signs of WS in the parents, screening for the 7q11.23 microdeletion identified in the proband is considered impractical. The risk for the proband's siblings depends on the parental status. If one parent is affected, the risk for each sibling to inherit the 7q11.23 microdeletion is 50%. If the parents are unaffected, the risk for siblings is generally low, but higher than the general population risk due to the inability to rule out parental gonadal mosaicism. For the proband's offspring, the risk of having an affected child is 50% for each pregnancy, regardless of the child's sex. The optimal time for determining genetic risk and discussing prenatal/preimplantation genetic testing is prior to pregnancy.

It is recommended that anthropometric measurements be performed in all patients with WS to monitor physical development parameters [3, 32].

GRC CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: height, weight, height SDS, growth velocity, BMI, and BMI SDS are assessed. Patients with WS most commonly exhibit postnatal growth restriction (below the 10th percentile) and moderate microcephaly. Postnatal poor weight gain is usually associated with feeding difficulties and frequent vomiting. The average adult height is 159 cm for males and 147 cm for females. This evaluation is recommended upon establishing the diagnosis and subsequently at every primary and follow-up clinical and diagnostic visit (consultation) with a pediatrician, general practitioner (family physician), medical geneticist, pediatric endocrinologist, or endocrinologist.

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and follow-up (as needed) consultations (examinations) with a pediatric endocrinologist/endocrinologist for the timely detection (diagnosis) and adequate management of endocrine system disorders [3, 62, 73, 91].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: the need for consultations is due to the high risk of developing endocrine pathologies (impaired glucose tolerance, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, obesity, precocious puberty, which worsens the final height prognosis), as well as for the treatment of persistent hypercalcemia.

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and subsequent annual follow-up consultations (examinations) with an otolaryngologist-audiologist to perform audiometry and detect hearing impairments [3, 29, 30].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: typical audiological features include hyperacusis, cochlear dysfunction, and sensorineural, conductive, and mixed hearing loss (predominantly in the high-frequency range). Speech, play, and pure-tone audiometry, as well as tympanometry, may be performed [30, 31].

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and follow-up consultations (examinations) with a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist to assess and monitor the cardiovascular system [27, 75-82].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: whenever possible, the management of patients with WS who have cardiovascular pathology should be carried out by a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist experienced in treating children with WS. Patients are at high risk for arterial hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. Lifelong follow-up by a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist is advisable for regular monitoring of the cardiovascular system.

It is recommended to measure blood pressure in the peripheral arteries of all patients with WS at every visit to a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist in order to diagnose arterial hypertension and initiate timely pharmacotherapy [3, 12, 27, 32, 62].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: measurements should be taken on the peripheral arteries of all limbs. Arterial hypertension is observed in the majority of patients with WS; in some cases, it develops secondary to renal artery stenosis [3, 27, 32].

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and follow-up (as needed) consultations (examinations) with a psychiatrist for the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders [3, 32].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: co-occurring mental and health behavioral problems requiring timely diagnosis and treatment are identified in 80% of patients with WS. The most frequently diagnosed conditions include intellectual disability, phobic and anxiety disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, behavioral disturbances, and sleep disorders.

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and follow-up (as needed) psychological testing and consultation with a medical psychologist to assess intellectual and cognitive deficits [3, 42, 62, 92].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comments: intellectual disability, attention deficit, and visuospatial dyspraxia can hinder a child in acquiring daily living and social skills, as well as in learning. Diagnosis using standardized tools will help objectively assess the child's abilities and potential to determine an educational pathway and develop a habilitation program.

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and follow-up (as needed) consultations (examinations) with an ophthalmologist for the diagnosis and correction of vision disorders [3, 32, 93-95].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: strabismus or refractive errors are diagnosed in approximately 40% of patients with WS.

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and follow-up (as needed) consultations (examinations) with a pediatric dentist/dentist for the diagnosis and treatment of dental issues [3, 32, 96, 97].

GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: patients with WS typically have small, irregular, widely spaced primary teeth. The prevalence of dental caries may be associated with enamel hypoplasia as well as difficulties children face in learning daily oral hygiene. The child's anxiety level and degree of intellectual deficit must be taken into account when developing appropriate skills. Issues of prevention and timely treatment of oral cavity diseases are particularly relevant for preventing infective endocarditis [32].

It is recommended that all patients with clinical signs of WS and with an established diagnosis of WS participate in the diagnosis and treatment by a multidisciplinary team of specialists for coordinated patient management [3, 32].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comment: the disease is characterized by involvement of multiple organs and systems and requires comprehensive therapy. Initial and follow-up (as needed) diagnostic and treatment consultations/appointments are indicated with a geneticist, pediatric cardiologist, cardiologist, neurologist, gastroenterologist, pediatric endocrinologist, endocrinologist, pediatric urologist-andrologist/urologist, nephrologist, trauma surgeon-orthopedist, nutritionist, psychiatrist, pediatrician/general practitioner (family physician)/internist, ophthalmologist, anesthesiologist-resuscitologist, dentist; initial and follow-up appointments (testing, consultation) with a medical psychologist, as well as specialists in other fields for patients with Williams syndrome who have functional impairments of the respective organs and systems [3].

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

3.1 Symptomatic treatment

It is recommended to use N05CH01 #Melatonin in children with Williams syndrome who have sleep disturbances in order to facilitate sleep onset, duration, and quality [3, 52, 53, 55, 56, 98, 99, 101]. The dose of #Melatonin is selected individually, usually starting at 1 mg and titrated every 1–2 weeks, with a maximum dose of 10 mg, orally, once daily before bedtime. A prolonged-release formulation of #Melatonin may be effective for increasing sleep duration [10, 51, 54-56].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: patients with Williams syndrome have been found to lack a noticeable pre-sleep increase in melatonin concentration and lack a nocturnal concentration peak. Nocturnal melatonin secretion promotes sleep onset and depth [10, 51, 100]. #Melatonin shortens sleep latency and increases sleep duration while having a favorable safety profile. The dose of #Melatonin is selected individually and ranges from 2 to 5 mg orally, once daily before bedtime. A prolonged-release formulation of #Melatonin may be effective for increasing sleep duration [10, 51, 54-56].

It is recommended to use N05CH01 Melatonin in adults with Williams syndrome who have sleep disturbances in order to facilitate sleep onset, duration, and quality [3, 98, 101, 119]. Dosing regimen according to the instructions.

GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)

It is recommended to use N06BA09 Atomoxetine in patients with Williams syndrome who have ASD, for the treatment of comorbid ADHD or ADD [57, 102]. Dosing regimen according to the instructions.

GCR BLoE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)

Comments: atomoxetine is used to treat ADD and ADHD in children older than 6 years. During treatment, ECG monitoring is critically important to detect signs of QT interval prolongation, given that patients with Williams syndrome have a tendency toward QT interval prolongation, and the drug may exert an additional effect on its duration. The daily dose is taken once in the morning. If the therapeutic effect is not achieved or in case of poor tolerability, the daily dose may be divided into two doses (morning and late afternoon).

It is recommended to have initial and follow-up (as needed) consultations with an ophthalmologist, otorhinolaryngologist-audiologist, pediatric endocrinologist/endocrinologist, trauma surgeon-orthopedist, neurologist, psychiatrist/pediatric psychiatrist, psychotherapist, surgeon, nephrologist for patients with Williams syndrome who have involvement of the respective organs and organ systems, in order to provide symptomatic therapy [3].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: treatment of complications and comorbid conditions is carried out in accordance with the relevant clinical guidelines. Appointments with medical specialists are indicated at least once a year or more frequently if clinically indicated. Patients with congenital heart disease are indicated for surgical treatment [12, 27]. The most common defects are supravalvular aortic stenosis, pulmonary artery branch stenosis, ventricular and atrial septal defects, renal artery stenosis, and aortic hypoplasia. Patients with Williams syndrome are at risk for developing long QT syndrome. Therefore, prior to surgical treatment, an initial and follow-up examination (evaluation, consultation) by a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist is required, along with an electrocardiogram recording with mandatory measurement of the corrected QT interval. It should be kept in mind that a number of medications that may be used in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and in the perioperative period, including for anesthesia, additionally lead to prolongation of the QTc interval.

3.2 Other Treatment

It is recommended for all patients with Williams syndrome to participate in adapted physical activity (APA) and adapted sports for the purpose of patient socialization, correction, and prevention of disease complications [3, 111-113].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended for all patients with Williams syndrome to receive sensory stimulation (music therapy, etc.) and sensory integration with a focus on vestibular stimulation in order to overcome emotional and physical difficulties through the influence of music, improve mood, reduce stress, correct emotional deviations, achieve social adaptation, and improve quality of life [42, 114-118].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

It is recommended for all patients with Williams syndrome to undergo physical therapy to improve mobility and reduce the risk of orthopedic complications [3].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to provide oral motor stimulation and training (medical and speech-language pathology assessment for dysphagia, medical and speech-language pathology procedure for dysphagia, development of an individualized speech-language rehabilitation program) for patients with Williams syndrome at an early stage of dysphagia in order to minimize the risks of complications and prepare a foundation for safe swallowing [3, 42, 118].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended for patients with Williams syndrome to have initial and follow-up appointments (testing, consultation) with a medical psychologist for the correction of behavioral and psychological manifestations of the disease (e.g., ADHD, anxiety, hyperacusis, phobias) if present, in order to socialize the patient and improve their quality of life [3, 42, 118].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comments: depending on the manifestations of the disease, the patient may require clinical and psychological adaptation, clinical and psychological counseling, clinical and psychological correction, psychotherapy, procedures for adaptation to the microenvironment, procedures for adaptation to the macroenvironment, development of an individualized psychological rehabilitation program, etc. For example, hyperacusis and phobias can in many cases be effectively treated using cognitive behavioral therapy.

It is recommended for patients with Williams syndrome with hypercalcemia to follow an appropriate modified diet and/or pharmacotherapy to correct the condition [3, 110].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: routine use of supplements (including multivitamins) containing vitamin D (ATC: A11CC Vitamins A and D, including combinations thereof) should be avoided [3, 20, 32].

It is recommended to provide timely treatment of complications and comorbid diseases and conditions, and surgical intervention for heart defects in order to restore adequate blood flow and normalize cardiac function [3].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: surgical intervention for heart defects is performed according to indications.

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

It is recommended to provide comprehensive care and ensure complete rehabilitation of patientss with Williams syndrome through coordinated teamwork of specialists (geneticist, pediatrician, general practitioner, physical and rehabilitation medicine physician, neurologist, otorhinolaryngologist-audiologist, trauma surgeon-orthopedist, pediatric dentist/dentist, medical psychologist, pediatric psychiatrist/psychiatrist) [32, 33, 103-106].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: specific rehabilitation for Williams syndrome is not provided.

The physical and rehabilitation medicine physician leads the multidisciplinary rehabilitation team. The rehabilitation of patients with Williams syndrome must also involve the following specialists with higher professional (non-medical) education: ergotherapist/occupational therapist (ergorehabilitation, occupational therapy), medical speech-language pathologist [107, 108] (initial and follow-up medical speech-language pathologist appointments (consultations), development of an individualized speech-language rehabilitation program, medical speech-language pathology procedure for dysphagia, medical speech-language pathology procedure for aphasia, medical speech-language pathology procedure for dysarthria, medical speech-language pathology tonal-rhythmic procedure), medical psychologist (initial and follow-up medical psychologist appointment (testing, consultation)), neuropsychologist (initial and follow-up neuropsychologist appointment (consultation), in the national medical service register — initial and follow-up medical psychologist appointment (testing, consultation)). Rehabilitation measures are carried out based on specific clinical symptoms (neurological, psychiatric, speech-language, etc.) and in accordance with the relevant clinical guidelines.

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

5.1 Medical-genetic counseling and prevention

WS is generally sporadic; however, the theoretical risk of transmitting the 7q11.23 chromosome deletion to children is 50%. If parents have no clinical signs of WS, parental FISH testing is not warranted. The risk for the proband's siblings depends on the parental status: if one parent carries the deletion, the risk is 50%; when parents are clinically healthy, the risk for the proband's siblings is low. It is worth noting that gonadal mosaicism cannot be ruled out in the proband's parents, meaning the theoretical risk of recurrence of a child with WS in the proband's parents may be higher than the population risk. The risk for the proband's offspring is 50%, which falls into the high genetic risk category. Prenatal diagnosis may be performed [3].

5.2 Dispensary monitoring

For specific features of organizing follow-up care for patients with WS across different age groups and organ systems, see Appendix A3.3.

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo anthropometric measurements at each visit to a pediatrician/general practitioner/family physician to monitor physical development parameters [3].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: height, weight, height SDS, growth rate, BMI, and BMI SDS are evaluated. Patients with WS most commonly exhibit postnatal growth restriction (below the 10th percentile) and moderate microcephaly. Poor weight gain after birth is usually associated with feeding difficulties and frequent vomiting. The average height of adult males is 159 cm, and for females — 147 cm. The study is recommended upon initial diagnosis and subsequently at each initial and follow-up appointment (consultation) with a pediatrician, general practitioner/family physician, or geneticist, as well as an initial and follow-up pediatric endocrinologist/endocrinologist.

It is recommended to perform a general clinical blood biochemistry panel (testing blood levels of glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol) and glycated hemoglobin testing in all patients with WS to detect metabolic disorders and timely correct the condition [20, 21, 73].

GCR BLOC 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

Comment: monitoring these parameters is necessary due to impaired glucose and lipid metabolism, and the frequent development of impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes mellitus in patients with WS. Tests are performed at initial diagnosis and subsequently monitored at least once a year.

It is recommended to test serum total calcium levels in all patients with WS to detect hypercalcemia and timely correct the condition [20, 34, 70-72].

GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comments: the test is performed upon initial diagnosis and subsequently monitored every 4–6 months up to 2 years of age, and annually thereafter [3]. Additionally, serum ionized calcium levels are tested if clinically indicated.

It is recommended to perform a general urinalysis in all patients with WS to assess the condition of the urinary system [3].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

Comments: monitoring these parameters is necessary due to the high prevalence of voiding dysfunction, lower urinary tract infections, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and arterial hypertension in patients with WS. The test is performed upon diagnosis and subsequently monitored in all patients at least once a year [3].

It is recommended to test blood levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (fT3), and serum free thyroxine (fT4) in all patients with WS to assess and monitor thyroid functional status [22, 23, 24]. These tests are performed upon diagnosis and subsequently in all patients annually up to 3 years of age, and then approximately once every 2 years [3].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: regular monitoring of thyroid functional activity is necessary due to the high prevalence of structural thyroid anomalies (hypoplasia, ectopia, hemiagenesis), which are often accompanied by subclinical or overt hypothyroidism.

It is recommended to test urinary calcium levels and determine the calcium-to-creatinine ratio in a single random urine sample in all patients with WS to detect and timely correct hypercalciuria [16, 19, 34, 71].

GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comments: determining the calcium-to-creatinine ratio in a single random urine sample is a more accurate method for diagnosing urinary calcium excretion (see Appendix A4). Patients with WS should avoid vitamin D overdose, as it may further promote calcium absorption in the gut [3, 18, 19, 33]. The test is performed upon diagnosis and subsequently monitored in all patients at least once a year [3].

It is recommended to test urinary creatinine levels in all patients with WS to assess the condition ofitoring urinary system [3, 16, 37].

GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: monitoring these parameters is necessary due to the high prevalence of voiding dysfunction, lower urinary tract infections, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, and arterial hypertension in patients with WS. Patients also need to have their glomerular filtration rate estimated based on blood creatinine levels using a calculation formula [37]. The test is performed upon diagnosis and subsequently monitored in all patients at least once a year [3].

It is recommended to measure blood pressure on peripheral arteries in all patients with WS to diagnose arterial hypertension and initiate timely pharmacotherapy [3, 12, 27, 32].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: the measurement is performed at every visit to a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist. Blood pressure must be measured on the peripheral arteries of all four limbs.

It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram for all patients with WS to assess the state of the cardiovascular system [27, 75-78].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: measurement of the QT interval is mandatory. Various cardiovascular pathologies occur in 80% of patients with WS and are the leading causes of death. The most frequent ECG findings are left and right ventricular myocardial hypertrophy and prolonged QT interval (QTc). QTc prolongation is associated with a high risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, and a high perioperative mortality rate; therefore, an electrocardiogram must be recorded prior to any surgical intervention. It is also necessary to assess all risk factors for sudden cardiac death, including the use of medications that promote QTc prolongation, especially before initiating medications used for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder [26, 27]. The test is performed upon diagnosis and subsequently at every visit to a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist, as well as before any surgical intervention [3].

It is recommended to perform echocardiography in all patients with WS to assess and monitor the development of cardiovascular lesions [3, 27, 75, 76, 78-80].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

Comments: echocardiography is used to quantitatively assess cardiac chamber dimensions, the severity of myocardial hypertrophy, aortic and mitral valve anomalies, septal defects, and Tetralogy of Fallot. The test is performed upon diagnosis and subsequently monitored annually until 5 years of age, and thereafter as clinically indicated, depending on the presence and severity of cardiovascular involvement [3].

It is recommended to perform Holter cardiac rhythm monitoring in all patients with WS to assess and further monitor the condition of the cardiac conduction system, heart rhythm, and QTc analysis [3, 27, 28, 78, 81-83].

LoE 3Strength of recommendation for children: B (Level of Evidence: 3), for adults: C (Level of Evidence: 4)

Comment: the test should be performed annually up to 5 years of age, and then every 2 years. Monitoring the cardiac conduction system is necessary due to the high risk of sudden cardiac death associated with a prolonged QTc interval. It is important to remember that a number of medications that may be used in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, as well as in the perioperative period, including for anesthesia, lead to QTc interval prolongation [28].

It is recommended to perform audiometry for all patients with WS to detect hearing impairments [29, 30, 33].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: annual audiological evaluation is recommended for children. Adults require an audiological evaluation at 30 years of age, with repeat evaluations every 3 years.

It is recommended to perform ultrasound examination of the thyroid and parathyroid glands in all patients with WS over time to morphologically evaluate the thyroid gland [3, 22-24, 33].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: the examination is performed at least once a year under the age of 3 years, then every 2 years.

It is recommended to perform an ultrasound examination of the kidneys and bladder in all patients with WS to assess the condition of the kidneys and bladder [16, 17, 19, 33, 37, 84].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: the examination is recommended every 10 years. All patients with WS need follow-up by a multidisciplinary team of specialists due to the fact that the disease is characterized by multi-organ involvement and requires complex therapy, which dictates the need for joint management of the patient by specialists of various profiles [3, 33].

Initial and follow-up visits (consultations) are indicated with a geneticist, ophthalmologist, neurologist, gastroenterologist, pediatric endocrinologist/endocrinologist, cardiologist/pediatric cardiologist, nephrologist, pediatrician/general practitioner (family physician), trauma surgeon/orthopedist, pediatric dentist/dentist, otorhinolaryngologist-audiologist, as well as with other specialists for WS patients who have impaired functions of the respective organs and systems.

It is recommended to perform an initial and follow-up (as needed) visit (examination, consultation) with a pediatric endocrinologist/endocrinologist in all patients with WS for the diagnosis and correction of endocrine system disorders [3, 73, 109].

GCR CLOE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)

Comment: dispensary follow-up by a pediatric endocrinologist is required. Consultations with specialized specialists are necessary due to the prevalence of endocrine system pathology (impaired glucose tolerance, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism), as well as for the treatment of persistent hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, and/or nephrocalcinosis.

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and subsequent annual follow-up consultations (examinations) with an otolaryngologist-audiologist to perform audiometry and detect hearing impairments [3, 29, 30].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: dispensary follow-up by an otorhinolaryngologist-audiologist is required. Typical audiological features are characteristic, such as hyperacusis, cochlear dysfunction, sensorineural, conductive, and mixed hearing loss (primarily in the high-frequency range). Speech, play, pure-tone audiometry, and tympanometry can be performed [30, 31].

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and follow-up consultations (examinations) with a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist to assess and monitor the cardiovascular system [27, 75-82].

Level of Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: dispensary follow-up by a cardiologist/pediatric cardiologist is required. Whenever possible, the treatment of WS patients with cardiovascular pathology should be carried out by a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist experienced in treating children with WS. Patients have a high risk of developing arterial hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. Lifelong monitoring by a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist is advisable for regular monitoring of the cardiovascular system.

It is recommended to measure blood pressure on peripheral arteries in all patients with WS at each visit to a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist for the diagnosis of arterial hypertension and timely initiation of drug therapy [3, 12, 27, 32, 61, 62].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

Comment: measurements should be taken on the peripheral arteries of all limbs. Arterial hypertension is observed in the majority of patients with WS; in some cases, it develops secondary to renal artery stenosis [3, 27, 32].

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and follow-up (as needed) consultations (examinations) with a psychiatrist for the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disorders [3, 32].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: dispensary follow-up by a psychiatrist is required. Co-occurring psychiatric and behavioral problems are identified in 80% of patients with WS, requiring timely diagnosis and treatment. Intellectual disability, phobic and anxiety disorders, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, behavioral disorders, and sleep disorders are detected most frequently.

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and follow-up (as needed) psychological testing and consultation with a medical psychologist to assess intellectual and cognitive deficits [3, 42, 62, 92].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comments: intellectual disability, attention deficit, and visuospatial dyspraxia can hinder a child in acquiring daily living and social skills, as well as in learning. Diagnosis using standardized tools will help objectively assess the child's abilities and potential to determine an educational pathway and develop a habilitation program.

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and follow-up (as needed) consultations (examinations) with an ophthalmologist for the diagnosis and correction of vision disorders [3, 32, 93-95].

GRC CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: dispensary follow-up by an ophthalmologist is required. Approximately 40% of patients with WS are diagnosed with strabismus or refractive errors.

It is recommended that all patients with WS undergo initial and follow-up (as needed) consultations (examinations) with a pediatric dentist/dentist for the diagnosis and treatment of dental issues [3, 32, 96, 97].

GRC CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: dispensary follow-up by a pediatric dentist/dentist is required. Patients with WS typically have small, uneven, widely spaced primary teeth. The prevalence of dental caries may be associated with enamel hypoplasia and difficulties children face in daily oral hygiene. The child's anxiety level and degree of intellectual deficit should be taken into account when developing relevant skills. Issues of prevention and timely treatment of oral cavity diseases are particularly relevant to prevent the development of infective endocarditis [32].

6. Organization of Medical Care

Indications for scheduled hospitalization in a medical organization:

  1. provision of diagnosis and treatment requiring prolonged (day or round-the-clock) medical observation and monitoring of clinical and laboratory parameters;

  2. the need for various types of expert evaluations or examinations in a medical organization when they cannot be performed on an outpatient basis (including issuing a conclusion of a federal concilium / medical commission).

Indications for emergency hospitalization in a medical organization:

  1. acute life-threatening conditions and conditions that may develop severe complications requiring emergency treatment, including intensive care, as well as 24-hour medical supervision and special diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Indications for discharging a patient from a medical organization:

  1. Absence of a threat to the patient's life and the risk of complications requiring emergency treatment upon completion of diagnostic procedures.

  2. Stabilization of the condition and basic clinical and laboratory parameters of the pathological process, absence of the need for prolonged medical observation (day or round-the-clock stay);

  3. The patient's examination and treatment plan has been completed, and recommendations for further monitoring and treatment have been given.

  4. Need to transfer the patient to another medical institution or social security institution.

7. Additional Information

It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram for all patients with WS to assess the state of the cardiovascular system [27, 75-78].

GPP CLOE 4Strength of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: the most frequent ECG findings in WS patients are left and right ventricular myocardial hypertrophy and QT interval (QTc) prolongation. QTc is associated with a high risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, and a high rate of perioperative mortality, which necessitates electrocardiogram recording with mandatory measurement of the QT interval before any surgical intervention. It is also necessary to assess all risk factors for sudden cardiac death, including medications contributing to QTc prolongation, especially before starting drugs used for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. It is important to remember that a number of drugs that may be used in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder lead to QTc interval prolongation [27, 28].

It is not recommended to routinely use supplements (including multivitamins) containing vitamin D (ATC: A11CC Vitamins A and D, including combinations) in patients with WS, since WS increases calcium absorption from the intestine, and vitamin D promotes calcium absorption [3, 18, 19].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: when deficiency is suspected, it is important to check the vitamin D level before starting therapy. Calcium levels should also be monitored throughout treatment; if possible, postpone the initiation of therapy with "vitamin D and its analogues" until after the resolution of hypercalcemia, which typically occurs between 18 months and 2 years of age [3, 18, 19].

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

№

Quality criteria

Performance assessment (yes/no)

1

Determination of gene structural variants in a biological material sample, other or unspecified, unclassified in other categories, performed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification OR cytogenetic study for a single chromosome pair by fluorescence in situ hybridization

yes/no

2

Determination of gene structural variants in a biological material sample, other or unspecified, unclassified in other categories, performed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in patients with suspected WS who have negative FISH results

yes/no

3

Assay of total blood calcium

yes/no

4

Holter heart rhythm monitoring

yes/no

5

Visit (examination, consultation) with a geneticist

yes/no

6

Visit (examination, consultation) with a pediatric endocrinologist/endocrinologist

yes/no

7

Initial and follow-up visits (examinations, consultations) with a pediatric cardiologist/cardiologist

yes/no

References

Show references
  1. Williams, JC, Barratt-Boyes, BG, Lowe, JB. Supravalvular aortic stenosis. // Circulation 24: 1311-1318, 1961.

  2. Pober BR. Williams-Beuren syndrome [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2010 Jun 3;362(22):2142]. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(3):239-252. doi:10.1056/NEJMra0903074

  3. Morris CA. Williams Syndrome. 1999 Apr 9 [Updated 2023 Apr 13]. In: Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, et al., editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993-2026. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1249/.

  4. Health Care Supervision for Children with Williams Syndrome Committee on Genetics // Pediatrics. 2001;107;1192–1204).

  5. Braam W, Smits IMG, Didden R, Korzilius H, Geijlswijk IMV, Curfs LMG Exogenous melatonin for sleep problems in individuals with intellectual disability: A meta-analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009,51, 340-349.

  6. Sargent J.D., Stukel T.A., Kresel J., Klein R.Z. Normal values for random urinary calcium to creatinine ratios in infancy. // J Pediatr. 1993, 123, 393-397.

  7. Twite MD, Stenquist S, Ing RJ. Williams syndrome. Paediatr Anaesth. 2019;29(5):483-490. doi:10.1111/pan.13620

  8. Mervis CB, Robinson BF, Bertrand J, Morris CA, Klein-Tasman BP, Armstrong SC. The Williams syndrome cognitive profile. Brain Cogn. 2000;44(3):604-628. doi:10.1006/brcg.2000.1232

  9. Mason TB, Arens R, Sharman J, et al. Sleep in children with Williams Syndrome. Sleep Med. 2011;12(9):892-897. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2011.05.003

  10. Santoro SD, Giacheti CM, Rossi NF, Campos LM, Pinato L. Correlations between behavior, memory, sleep-wake and melatonin in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Physiol Behav. 2016;159:14-19. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.03.010

  11. Collins RT 2nd, Kaplan P, Somes GW, Rome JJ. Long-term outcomes of patients with cardiovascular abnormalities and williams syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105(6):874-878. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.069

  12. Bouchireb K, Boyer O, Bonnet D, et al. Clinical features and management of arterial hypertension in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(2):434-438. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfp522

  13. Marler JA, Sitcovsky JL, Mervis CB, Kistler DJ, Wightman FL. Auditory function and hearing loss in children and adults with Williams syndrome: cochlear impairment in individuals with otherwise normal hearing. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2010;154C(2):249-265. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30262

  14. Kim YM, Cho JH, Kang E, et al. Endocrine dysfunctions in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome. Ann Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2016;21(1):15-20. doi:10.6065/apem.2016.21.1.15

  15. Wilson M, Carter IB. Williams Syndrome. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; July 25, 2021.

  16. Sugayama SM, Koch VH, Furusawa EA, Leone C, Kim CA. Renal and urinary findings in 20 patients with Williams-Beuren syndrome diagnosed by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo. 2004;59(5):266-272. doi:10.1590/s0041-87812004000500008

  17. Sammour ZM, de Bessa J Jr, Hisano M, et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms in children and adolescents with Williams-Beuren syndrome. J Pediatr Urol. 2017;13(2):203.e1-203.e6. doi:10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.10.003

  18. Abidi K, Jellouli M, Ben Rabeh R, Hammi Y, Gargah T. Williams-Beuren syndrome associated with single kidney and nephrocalcinosis: a case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2015;22:276. Published 2015 Nov 23. doi:10.11604/pamj.2015.22.276.7929

  19. Sforzini C, Milani D, Fossali E, et al. Renal tract ultrasonography and calcium homeostasis in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2002;17(11):899-902. doi:10.1007/s00467-002-0889-z

  20. Shaikh S, Waxler JL, Lee H, et al. Glucose and lipid metabolism, bone density, and body composition in individuals with Williams syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2018;89(5):596-604. doi:10.1111/cen.13829

  21. Pober BR, Wang E, Caprio S, et al. High prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes in adults with Williams syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2010;154C(2):291-298. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30261

  22. Selicorni A, Fratoni A, Pavesi MA, Bottigelli M, Arnaboldi E, Milani D. Thyroid anomalies in Williams syndrome: investigation of 95 patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140(10):1098-1101. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.31210

  23. Stagi S, Bindi G, Neri AS, et al. Thyroid function and morphology in patients affected by Williams syndrome. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2005;63(4):456-460. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02365.x

  24. Cambiaso P, Orazi C, Digilio MC, et al. Thyroid morphology and subclinical hypothyroidism in children and adolescents with Williams syndrome. J Pediatr. 2007;150(1):62-65. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.10.060

  25. Phomakay V, Gossett JM, Kaplan PB, Swearingen CJ, Collins RT 2nd. Ventricular Hypertrophy on Electrocardiogram Correlates with Obstructive Lesion Severity in Williams Syndrome. Congenit Heart Dis. 2015;10(4):302-309. doi:10.1111/chd.12194

  26. Collins RT 2nd, Aziz PF, Gleason MM, Kaplan PB, Shah MJ. Abnormalities of cardiac repolarization in Williams syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(7):1029-1033. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.05.041

  27. Collins RT 2nd. Cardiovascular disease in Williams syndrome. Circulation. 2013;127(21):2125-2134. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000064

  28. Collins RT 2nd. Clinical significance of prolonged QTc interval in Williams syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(3):471-473. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.071

  29. Barozzi S, Soi D, Spreafico E, et al. Audiological follow-up of 24 patients affected by Williams syndrome. Eur J Med Genet. 2013;56(9):490-496. doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2013.07.001

  30. Barozzi S, Soi D, Comiotto E, et al. Audiological findings in Williams syndrome: a study of 69 patients. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A(4):759-771. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.35241

  31. Silva LAF, Kim CA, Matas CG. Characteristics of auditory evaluation in Williams syndrome: a systematic review. Características da avaliação auditiva na síndrome de Williams: revisão sistemática. Codas. 2018;30(5):e20170267. Published 2018 Sep 17. doi:10.1590/2317-1782/20182017267

  32. Lacroix A, Pezet M, Capel A, et al. Le syndrome de Williams-Beuren: une approche pluridisciplinaire [Williams-Beuren syndrome: a multidisciplinary approach]. Arch Pediatr. 2009;16(3):273-282. doi:10.1016/j.arcped.2008.11.011

  33. Morris CA, Braddock SR; COUNCIL ON GENETICS. Health Care Supervision for Children With Williams Syndrome. Pediatrics. 2020;145(2):e20193761. doi:10.1542/peds.2019-3761

  34. Sugayama SM, Leone C, Chauffaille Mde L, Okay TS, Kim CA. Williams Syndrome: development of a new scoring system for clinical diagnosis. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007;62(2):159-166. doi:10.1590/s1807-59322007000200011

  35. Gul H. Dadlani, Coralis Mercado, Val Roberts, Holiday Blackwelder, Kaye Erickson, Gabrielle Shrimpton, Jennifer Stein, Chloe Morrison, Stacey Stoner, Karen Bender, Brian Gronert, Peace Madueme. Cardiovascular screening in Williams syndrome. Progress in Pediatric Cardiology, Volume 58, 2020, 101267, ISSN 1058-9813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppedcard.2020.101267.

  36. Honjo RS, Dutra RL, Furusawa EA, et al. Williams-Beuren Syndrome: A Clinical Study of 55 Brazilian Patients and the Diagnostic Use of MLPA [published correction appears in Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:568047]. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:903175. doi:10.1155/2015/903175

  37. Pankau R, Partsch CJ, Winter M, Gosch A, Wessel A. Incidence and spectrum of renal abnormalities in Williams-Beuren syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1996;63(1):301-304. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960503)63:1<301::AID-AJMG49>3.0.CO;2-P

  38. Mervis CB, Kistler DJ, John AE, Morris CA. Longitudinal assessment of intellectual abilities of children with Williams syndrome: multilevel modeling of performance on the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-Second Edition. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012;117(2):134-155. doi:10.1352/1944-7558-117.2.134

  39. Greer MK, Brown FR 3rd, Pai GS, Choudry SH, Klein AJ. Cognitive, adaptive, and behavioral characteristics of Williams syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1997;74(5):521-525. doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19970919)74:5<521::aid-ajmg13>3.0.co;2-e

  40. Levy Y, Smith J, Tager-Flusberg H. Word reading and reading-related skills in adolescents with Williams syndrome. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003;44(4):576-587. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00146

  41. Klein-Tasman BP, Phillips KD, Lord C, Mervis CB, Gallo FJ. Overlap with the autism spectrum in young children with Williams syndrome. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2009;30(4):289-299. doi:10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181ad1f9a

  42. Mervis CB, John AE. Cognitive and behavioral characteristics of children with Williams syndrome: implications for intervention approaches. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2010;154C(2):229-248. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.30263

  43. Dykens EM, Rosner BA, Ly T, Sagun J. Music and anxiety in Williams syndrome: a harmonious or discordant relationship?. Am J Ment Retard. 2005;110(5):346-358. doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110[346:MAAIWS]2.0.CO;2

  44. Beuren A. J., Apitz J., Harmjanz D. Supravalvular aortic stenosis in association with mental retardation and a certain facial appearance // circulation. – 1962. – Т. 26. – №. 6. – С. 1235-1240.

  45. Mervis C. B., Pitts C. H. Children with Williams syndrome: Developmental trajectories for intellectual abilities, vocabulary abilities, and adaptive behavior // American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics. – 2015. – Т. 169. – №. 2. – С. 158-171.

  46. Levy Y., Smith J., Tager‐Flusberg H. Word reading and reading‐related skills in adolescents with Williams syndrome // Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. – 2003. – Т. 44. – №. 4. – С. 576-587.

  47. Leyfer O. T. et al. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in 4 to 16‐year‐olds with Williams syndrome // American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics. – 2006. – Т. 141. – №. 6. – С. 615-622.

  48. Woodruff‐Borden J. et al. Longitudinal course of anxiety in children and adolescents with Williams syndrome // American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics. – Hoboken : Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company, 2010. – Т. 154. – №. 2. – С. 277-290.

  49. Dykens E. M. Anxiety, fears, and phobias in persons with Williams syndrome //Developmental neuropsychology. – 2003. – Т. 23. – №. 1-2. – С. 291-316.

  50. Pitts C. H. et al. Predictors of specific phobia in children with Williams syndrome // Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. – 2016. – Т. 60. – №. 10. – С. 1031-1042

  51. Sniecinska-Cooper AM, Iles RK, Butler SA, Jones H, Bayford R, Dimitriou D. Abnormal secretion of melatonin and cortisol in relation to sleep disturbances in children with Williams syndrome. Sleep Med. 2015;16(1):94-100. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2014.09.003

  52. Esposito S, Laino D, D'Alonzo R, et al. Pediatric sleep disturbances and treatment with melatonin. J Transl Med. 2019;17(1):77. Published 2019 Mar 12. doi:10.1186/s12967-019-1835-1

  53. Blackmer AB, Feinstein JA. Management of Sleep Disorders in Children With Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Review. Pharmacotherapy. 2016;36(1):84-98. doi:10.1002/phar.1686

  54. Annaz D, Hill CM, Ashworth A, Holley S, Karmiloff-Smith A. Characterisation of sleep problems in children with Williams syndrome. Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32(1):164-169. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.09.008

  55. Wasdell MB, Jan JE, Bomben MM, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of controlled release melatonin treatment of delayed sleep phase syndrome and impaired sleep maintenance in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. J Pineal Res. 2008;44(1):57-64. doi:10.1111/j.1600-079X.2007.00528.x

  56. Cuomo BM, Vaz S, Lee EAL, Thompson C, Rogerson JM, Falkmer T. Effectiveness of Sleep-Based Interventions for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Synthesis. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37(5):555-578. doi:10.1002/phar.1920

  57. Patra S, Nebhinani N, Viswanathan A, Kirubakaran R. Atomoxetine for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents with autism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autism Res. 2019;12(4):542-552. doi:10.1002/aur.2059

  58. de Sousa Lima Strafacci A. et al. Growth assessment in children with Williams-Beuren syndrome: a systematic review // Journal of applied genetics. – 2020. – Т. 61. – №. 2. – С. 205-212.

  59. Kruszka P. et al. Williams–Beuren syndrome in diverse populations //American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A. – 2018. – Т. 176. – №. 5. – С. 1128-1136.

  60. Miklós G. et al. Williams–Beuren-szindróma (Williams-szindróma) // Orvosi Hetilap. – 2017. – Т. 158. – №. 47. – С. 1883-1888.

  61. Wessel A. et al. Arterial hypertension and blood pressure profile in patients with Williams-Beuren syndrome [In German] //Z. Kardiol. – 1997. – Т. 86. – С. 251-257.

  62. Lopez‐Rangel E. et al. Williams syndrome in adults // American Journal of Medical Genetics. – 1992. – Vol. 44, no. 6. – P. 720-729.

  63. Damasceno M. L. et al. Prevalence of scoliosis in Williams-Beuren syndrome patients treated at a regional reference center // Clinics. – 2014. – Vol. 69, no. 7. – P. 452-456.

  64. de Oliveira K. M. K. et al. Clinical Findings in a Series of Thirty Eight Patients with Williams-Beuren Syndrome // Cytogenetic and Genome Research. – 2024. – Vol. 164, no. 3-4. – P. 139-147.

  65. Wang L. X. et al. Clinical and genetic characteristics of two cases with Williams-Beuren syndrome // Translational Pediatrics. – 2021. – Vol. 10, no. 6. – P. 1743.

  66. Bouzid F. Z. et al. Williams-Beuren syndrome: a retrospective study of a series of 11 cases at the Mohammed VI University Hospital in Marrakech // The Pan African Medical Journal. – 2023. – Vol. 46. – P. 94.

  67. Lv X. et al. Prenatal diagnosis of 7q11. 23 microdeletion: Two cases report and literature review // Medicine. – 2023. – Vol. 102, no. 43. – P. e34852.

  68. Huang M. et al. Clinical features and genetic analysis of two children with Williams-Beuren syndrome // Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi = Zhonghua Yixue Yichuanxue Zazhi = Chinese Journal of Medical Genetics. – 2023. – Vol. 40, no. 7. – P. 828-832.

  69. Mikhaylova T.V., Sadykova D.I., Pudovik T.V. Williams syndrome in a child with multi-organ pathology // Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics. – 2017. – Vol. 62, no. 5. – P. 106-110.

  70. Sindhar S. et al. Hypercalcemia in patients with Williams-Beuren syndrome // The Journal of Pediatrics. – 2016. – Vol. 178. – P. 254-260. e4.

  71. Baştuğ F. et al. Acute renal failure due to severe hypercalcemia and nephrocalcinosis treated with two doses of pamidronate in an infant with Williams-Beuren syndrome // The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics. – 2018. – Vol. 60, no. 2. – P. 210-215.

  72. Tersteeg S. et al. Incidental Diagnosis of Williams Syndrome in an Adult With Recurrent Hypercalcemia // JCEM Case Reports. – 2024. – Vol. 2, no. 1. – P. luad164

  73. Lunati M. E. et al. Impaired glucose metabolism in subjects with the Williams-Beuren syndrome: A five-year follow-up cohort study // PLoS One. – 2017. – Vol. 12, no. 10. – P. e0185371.

  74. Pober BR, Lacro RV, Rice C, Mandell V, Teele RL. Renal findings in 40 individuals with Williams syndrome. Am J Med Genet. 1993 May 15;46(3):271-4. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320460306. PMID: 8488870.

  75. Olowu A. A. Williams–Beuren syndrome diagnosis in an infant with atypical chromosome 7 microdeletion // BMJ Case Reports CP. – 2024. – Vol. 17, no. 7. – P. e260312.

  76. Al-Momani H. et al. Long Segment Midaortic Stenosis in Williams Syndrome: Report of a Very Rare Presentation // Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. – 2025. – Vol. 39. – P. 94.

  77. Deitch A. M. et al. Arrhythmias in Williams syndrome // The American Journal of Cardiology. – 2023. – Vol. 195. – P. 91-97.

  78. Levin M. D. et al. Heart rate variability analysis may identify individuals with Williams-Beuren Syndrome at risk of sudden death // Clinical Electrophysiology. – 2023. – Vol. 9, no. 3. – P. 359-370.

  79. De Keijzer A. R. et al. Clinical course and outcomes of supravalvular aortic stenosis in adults // Open Heart. – 2025. – Vol. 12, no. 1. – P. e003355.

  80. Scheiber D. et al. Echocardiographic findings in patients with Williams-Beuren syndrome // Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift. – 2006. – Vol. 118, no. 17. – P. 538-542.

  81. Maloberti A. et al. Increased nocturnal heart rate and wave reflection are early markers of cardiovascular disease in Williams–Beuren syndrome children // Journal of Hypertension. – 2015. – Vol. 33, no. 4. – P. 804-809.

  82. Giordano U. et al. Exercise testing and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in children with Williams syndrome // Pediatric Cardiology. – 2001. – Vol. 22, no. 6. – P. 509-511.

  83. Velarde‐Acosta K. et al. Williams‐Beuren syndrome associated with hammock mitral valve: First case report // Echocardiography. – 2023. – Vol. 40, no. 3. – P. 285-288.

  84. Sammour Z. M. et al. Congenital genitourinary abnormalities in children with Williams–Beuren syndrome // Journal of Pediatric Urology. – 2014. – Vol. 10, no. 5. – P. 804-809.

  85. Zinyandu T. et al. Long-term outcomes after surgical intervention for congenital supravalvar aortic stenosis in children // The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. – 2024. – Vol. 117, no. 5. – P. 965-972.

  86. Micari A. et al. Advanced Multimodality Cardiovascular Imaging of Supravalvular Aortic Stenosis in Williams-Beuren Syndrome // Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. – 2024. – Vol. 17, no. 11. – P. e016733.

  87. Voges I. et al. Fatal severe coronary artery stenosis in Williams syndrome: decision making using late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular MRI // Cardiology in the Young. – 2017. – Vol. 27, no. 7. – P. 1398-1401.

  88. Amer Y. Computerized tomography use in Williams–Beuren syndrome aortopathy // Heart Views. – 2017.

  89. Tersteeg S. et al. Incidental Diagnosis of Williams Syndrome in an Adult With Recurrent Hypercalcemia // JCEM Case Reports. – 2024. – Vol. 2, no. 1. – P. luad164.

  90. Meng H. et al. A case report of Williams syndrome with main clinical manifestation of hypercalcemia and gastrointestinal bleeding as the main clinical manifestations, and with an accompanying literature review // Brain and Behavior. – 2023. – Vol. 13, no. 8. – P. e3131.

  91. Güven A. Seven cases with Williams-Beuren syndrome: endocrine evaluation and long-term follow-up // Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism. – 2017. – Vol. 30, no. 2. – P. 159-165.

  92. Davies M., Howlin P., Udwin O. Adults with Williams syndrome: Preliminary study of social, emotional and behavioural difficulties // The British Journal of Psychiatry. – 1998. – Vol. 172, no. 3. – P. 273-276.

  93. Yılmaz G. et al. Williams-Beuren syndrome case series with thinner fovea centralis and central corneal thicknesses // Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología (English Edition). – 2025. – Vol. 100, no. 5. – P. 238-245.

  94. Van Splunder J., Stilma J. S., Evenhuis H. M. Visual performance in specific syndromes associated with intellectual disability // European Journal of Ophthalmology. – 2003. – Vol. 13, no. 6. – P. 566-574.

  95. Calleja-García C. et al. Ophthalmological manifestations in 6 patients diagnosed with Williams-Beuren syndrome and literature review // Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología (English Edition). – 2022. – Vol. 97, no. 5. – P. 276-280.

  96. Castro T. et al. Oral characteristics and medical considerations in the dental treatment of individuals with Williams syndrome // Special Care in Dentistry. – 2019. – Vol. 39, no. 2. – P. 108-113.

  97. Yamaguchi T. et al. Orthodontic Treatment and Maxillary Anterior Segmental Distraction Osteogenesis of a Subject with Williams–Beuren Syndrome and Isolated Cleft Palate: A Long‐Term Follow‐Up from the Age of 5 to 24 Years // Case Reports in Dentistry. – 2017. – Vol. 2017, no. 1. – P. 7019045.

  98. Shelton AR, Malow B. Neurodevelopmental Disorders Commonly Presenting with Sleep Disturbances. Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Jan;18(1):156-169. doi: 10.1007/s13311-020-00982-8. Epub 2021 Jan 5. PMID: 33403472; PMCID: PMC8116361.

  99. Martens M. A. et al. Use and effectiveness of sleep medications by parent report in individuals with Williams syndrome // Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics. – 2017. – Vol. 38, no. 9. – P. 765-771.

  100. Woodford E. C. et al. Endogenous melatonin and sleep in individuals with Rare Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders (RGND): a systematic review // Sleep Medicine Reviews. – 2021. – Vol. 57. – P. 101433.

  101. Bódizs R, Gombos F, Gerván P, Szőcs K, Réthelyi JM, Kovács I. Aging and sleep in Williams syndrome: accelerated sleep deterioration and decelerated slow wave sleep decrement. Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Dec;35(12):3226-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.056. Epub 2014 Aug 30. PMID: 25178705.

  102. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Medications for Adults: Drugs [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2024 Nov. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK610422/

  103. Gilbert-Dussardier B. Le syndrome de Williams-Beuren [Williams-Beuren syndrome]. Rev Prat. 2006 Dec 15;56(19):2102-6. French. PMID: 17416045.

  104. Thom R.P. Psychiatric and behavioral manifestations of Williams syndrome. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 1;37(2):65-70. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000914. Epub 2023 Dec 11. PMID: 38085853.

  105. Waxler J.L., Levine K., Pober B.R. Williams syndrome: a multidisciplinary approach to care. Pediatr Ann. 2009 Aug;38(8):456-63. doi: 10.3928/00904481-20090723-10. PMID: 19711883.

  106. Pober BR, Morris CA. Diagnosis and management of medical problems in adults with Williams-Beuren syndrome. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2007 Aug 15;145C(3):280-90. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.30139. PMID: 17639596.

  107. Loveall S.J., Hawthorne K., Gaines M. A meta-analysis of prosody in autism, Williams syndrome, and Down syndrome. J Commun Disord. 2021 Jan-Feb;89:106055. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106055. Epub 2020 Nov 22. PMID: 33285421.

  108. Hippolyte A., Majerus S., Ponthot M. et al. Acoustic and phonological processes in Williams Syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2025 Aug;175:106236. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106236. Epub 2025 May 27. PMID: 40441670.

  109. Song W. R. et al. Secondary diabetes due to different etiologies: Four case reports // World Journal of Clinical Cases. – 2024. – Vol. 12, no. 16. – P. 2813.

  110. Gupta V., Pandita A., Panghal A., Kallem V.R. Williams syndrome with severe hypercalcaemia. BMJ Case Rep. 2018 Sep 27;2018:bcr2018224513. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2018-224513. PMID: 30262523; PMCID: PMC6169651.

  111. Nordstrøm M. et al. Accelerometer-determined physical activity and walking capacity in persons with Down syndrome, Williams syndrome and Prader–Willi syndrome // Research in Developmental Disabilities. – 2013. – Vol. 34, no. 12. – P. 4395-4403.

  112. Mayall L. A. et al. Motor abilities and the motor profile in individuals with Williams syndrome // Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders. – 2021. – Vol. 5, no. 1. – P. 46-60.

  113. Borland R. L. et al. Participation in sport and physical activity in adults with intellectual disabilities // Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. – 2020. – Vol. 64, no. 12. – P. 908-922.

  114. Villatte J. et al. Music and Language in Williams Syndrome: An Integrative and Systematic Mini-Review // Behavioral Sciences. – 2025. – Vol. 15, no. 5. – P. 595.

  115. Kwak E. E. An exploratory study of the use of music therapy in teaching mathematical skills to individuals with Williams syndrome. – Michigan State University, 2008.

  116. Dunning B. A., Martens M. A., Jungers M. K. Music lessons are associated with increased verbal memory in individuals with Williams syndrome // Research in Developmental Disabilities. – 2015. – Vol. 36. – P. 565-578.

  117. John A. E., Mervis C. B. Sensory modulation impairments in children with Williams syndrome // American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics. – Hoboken : Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company, 2010. – Vol. 154, no. 2. – P. 266-276.

  118. Semel E., Rosner S. R. Understanding Williams syndrome: Behavioral patterns and interventions. – Routledge, 2003.

  119. Woodford E. C. et al. Endogenous melatonin and sleep in individuals with Rare Genetic Neurodevelopmental Disorders (RGND): a systematic review // Sleep Medicine Reviews. – 2021. – Vol. 57. – P. 101433.

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

Inga V. Anisimova — Cand. Sc. (Med.), Medical Geneticist, Head of the Department of Medical Care Organization, Research Centre for Medical Genetics, Member of the Association of Medical Geneticists (AMG).

Berkutova Irina Yuryevna — Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Federal State Budgetary Institution "Federal Scientific Center for Physical Culture and Sports (VNIIFK)", Chief Rehabilitation Specialist, Occupational Therapist at the Autonomous Non-Profit Organization "Center for Evidence-Based Non-Medical Rehabilitation of Persons with Disabilities and Other Health Impairments 'Special Garden'".

Grigorieva Veronika Vladimirovna — Founder of the Williams Syndrome Support Charity Foundation, Project Manager.

Kornoukhov Oleg Yuryevich — Candidate of Medical Sciences, Cardiovascular Surgeon, Cardiosurgical Department, N.F. Filatova Children's City Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Healthcare Department.

Kuvaldina Ekaterina Viktorovna — Pediatric Endocrinologist, Russian Children's Clinical Hospital — Branch of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Sergey I. Kutsev — Academician of the RAS, Professor, D.Sc. in Medicine, Director of the Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov, President of the Association of Medical Geneticists (AMG).

Anna A. Portnova — D.Sc. in Medicine, President of the Association of Psychiatrists and Psychologists for Evidence-Based Practice.

Valeria V. Sviridova — Medical Geneticist at the Department of Medical Care Organization, Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov; Junior Research Fellow at the Laboratory of Mutagenesis, Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov.

Dmitry M. Subbotin — Medical Geneticist at the Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov, Member of the Association of Medical Geneticists (AMG).

Svetlana P. Tsinovskaya — Pediatric Neuropsychologist, Certified Sensory Integration Specialist (CLASI), Curator of Educational Projects, "Territory of Speech" Speech Therapy Center, Moscow.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

These guidelines are intended for use by medical organizations and institutions of federal, territorial, and municipal healthcare management systems, compulsory and voluntary medical insurance systems, and other medical organizations of various legal forms engaged in the provision of medical care.

Target audience for these clinical guidelines:

  1. Medical geneticist;

  2. Pediatrician;

  3. General practitioner (internist);

  4. Neurologist;

  5. Psychiatrist;

  6. Pediatric cardiologist;

  7. Cardiologist;

  8. Pediatric endocrinologist;

  9. Endocrinologist;

  10. Pediatric surgeon;

  11. Surgeon;

  12. Traumatologist-orthopedist;

  13. Pediatric dentist;

  14. Dentist;

  15. Medical psychologist;

  16. Otorhinolaryngologist-audiologist;

  17. Functional diagnostics physicians;

  18. Residents;

  19. Medical students.

Table 1. Scale for assessing the levels of evidence (LE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

Table 2. Scale for assessing the levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis

2

Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

Table 3. Rating scale for grades of recommendation (GR) for preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitation methods (interventions)

GoR

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.

The update mechanism for clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision—at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based data regarding the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific conditions, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

These clinical guidelines have been developed taking into account the following regulatory legal documents:

  1. Federal Law No. 323-FZ of November 21, 2011 (as amended on December 25, 2023) "On the Fundamentals of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation".

  2. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 274n dated April 21, 2022, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Patients with Congenital and (or) Hereditary Diseases."

  3. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 203n dated May 10, 2017, "On Approval of Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Medical Care."

  4. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10).

  5. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 205n dated May 2, 2023 (as amended on December 4, 2023) "On approval of the Nomenclature of positions of medical workers and pharmaceutical workers".

  6. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 103n dated February 28, 2019 (as amended on June 23, 2020) "On Approval of the Procedure and Timeframes for the Development of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Their Revision, the Standard Template of Clinical Practice Guidelines, and Requirements for Their Structure, Composition, and Scientific Validity of Information Included in Clinical Practice Guidelines".

Appendix A3.1 Main syndromes for differential diagnosis of WS [3]

Appendix A3. Reference Materials — Williams Syndrome

Appendix A3.2 Main symptoms observed in WS [33]

Symptoms by organ system

Frequency, %

Age

Infancy

Childhood

Adulthood

Eyes and vision

Esotropia

50

+

-

-

Hyperopia

50

-

+

+

Hearing

Recurrent otitis media

50

+

+

-

Sound hypersensitivity

90

+

+

+

Progressive sensorineural hearing loss

65

-

+

+

Teeth

Malocclusion

85

-

+

+

Microdontia

95

-

+

+

Cardiovascular system

Any anomalies (total)

80

+

+

+

Supravalvular aortic stenosis

75

+

+

+

Supravalvular pulmonary stenosis

25

+

+

+

Peripheral pulmonary artery stenosis

50

+

-

-

Other arterial stenoses

20

-

+

+

Ventricular septal defect

10

+

-

-

Arterial hypertension

50

-

+

+

Prolonged QTc

13

-

+

+

Genitourinary system

Structural anomalies

5

+

+

+

Enuresis

50

-

+

-

Nephrocalcinosis

< 5

+

-

+

Bladder diverticulum

50

-

+

+

Gastrointestinal tract

Feeding difficulties

70

+

+

-

Constipation

50

+

+

+

Colonic diverticulosis

30

-

+

+

Rectal prolapse

15

+

+

-

Skin

Soft, lax skin

90

+

+

+

Inguinal hernia

40

+

-

-

Umbilical hernia

50

+

-

-

Premature graying of hair

90

-

-

+

Musculoskeletal system

Joint hypermobility

90

+

+

-

Joint contractures

50

+

+

+

Radiocarpal synostosis

20

+

+

+

Kyphosis

20

-

-

+

Scoliosis

18

-

+

+

Lordosis

40

-

+

+

Awkward gait

60

-

+

+

Calcium metabolism

Hypercalcemia

15-40

+

-

+

Hypercalciuria

30

+

+

+

Endocrine system

Hypothyroidism

5-10

+

+

+

Precocious puberty (rarely true precocious puberty)

20

-

+

-

Diabetes mellitus

15

-

-

+

Obesity

30

-

+

+

Nervous system

Brisk deep tendon reflexes

75

-

+

+

Chiari malformation

10

+

+

+

Hypotonia (central)

80

+

+

-

Hypertonia

50

-

+

+

Cognitive functions

Psychomotor and speech developmental delay

95

+

+

-

Intellectual disability

75

-

+

+

Normal intelligence

5

-

+

+

Impaired visuospatial perception

95

-

+

+

Behavioral characteristics

Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

65

-

+

-

Anxiety disorder

70

-

+

+

Sleep disorders

65

-

+

+

Appendix A3.3 Dispensary follow-up in patients with WS across different age groups [33]

Age

Infancy — early childhood

Investigations

● Serum total calcium level testing every 4–6 months until the age of 2 years;

● Blood thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (FT3), and serum free thyroxine (FT4) testing once a year up to the age of 3 years.

Annually, at any age (except where specified otherwise)

● Anthropometric measurements;

● General clinical blood biochemistry panel (testing for glucose, glycated hemoglobin, triglycerides, cholesterol, lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol);

● Complete urinalysis;

● Vision screening to detect refractive errors and strabismus;

● Audiometry up to the age of 30 years;

● Measurement of peripheral arterial blood pressure;

● Calcium-to-creatinine ratio measurement in a random urine sample / urinalysis;

● Follow-up and examination by a cardiologist at least once a year for the first 5 years, then every 2–3 years thereafter for life;

● 24-hour Holter ECG monitoring for all patients with WS annually up to the age of 5 years, then every 2 years thereafter.

Every 2 years

● Blood thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free triiodothyronine (FT3), and free thyroxine (FT4) testing;

● Ultrasound examination of the thyroid and parathyroid glands.

Every 10 years

● Ultrasound examination of the kidneys and urinary bladder.

Adults

● Audiometry at the age of 30 years and every three years thereafter.

● Patients over 30 years of age should undergo an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) every 2 years.

Appendix. Normal values of the calcium-to-creatinine ratio in a single urine sample [33]

Age

Calcium/creatinine ratio (mg/mg; 95th percentile for age)

< 7 mos.

0.86 

7 – 18 mos.

0.6 

19 mos. – 6 yrs.

0.42 

Adults

0.22 

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms — Williams Syndrome

Appendix C. Patient Information

What is Williams syndrome?

Williams syndrome (WS) (often referred to as "elfin face syndrome") is a condition resulting from a chromosomal abnormality (microdeletion on chromosome 7), characterized by a distinctive facial appearance, intellectual disability (usually mild), and specific behavioral features.

How does Williams syndrome manifest?

Most children with WS share similar facial features. These features may sometimes be subtle and can become more pronounced with age. Facial features include periorbital fullness, starburst (stellate) iris, short nose with a bulbous tip, wide mouth, full lips, and small mandible; older children and adults tend to have a long, narrow face and a long neck.

From birth, infants with WS most commonly have low birth weight; breastfed infants feed poorly and frequently suffer from vomiting, constipation, abdominal pain, and poor weight gain.

Many children with WS are diagnosed with congenital heart disease, most commonly aortic stenosis, requiring surgical intervention.

How is Williams syndrome inherited?

WS occurs sporadically, i.e., by chance. The recurrence risk for parents who already have a child with Williams syndrome is estimated to be extremely low (genetic risk counseling should be discussed with a geneticist).

How is Williams syndrome diagnosed?

A physician may suspect WS based on clinical symptoms. Physical examination reveals characteristic facial features, personality traits, and behavioral patterns. Serum calcium levels may be elevated on blood biochemistry. Echocardiography may reveal congenital heart disease. However, these signs can also occur in other genetic syndromes. Definitive confirmation requires DNA diagnostics. The gold standard is testing for deletions in the 7q11 region. The specific testing method is determined by a geneticist.

How is Williams syndrome treated?

Management centers primarily on symptomatic treatment and educational/rehabilitative support. Therapy for patients with WS is tailored individually. Special educational programs are developed for children with varying degrees of developmental delay. Behavioral counseling is provided, with options for pharmacotherapy for attention deficit and anxiety disorders. Surgical intervention may be performed for congenital heart defects. In cases of hypercalcemia, a modified diet and/or specific medications are prescribed. The prognosis is relatively favorable, and social adaptation is possible, which directly depends on early diagnosis, early intervention, and the prompt initiation of therapy.

Family support.

There are several organizations in Russia that can help you find answers to questions related to Williams syndrome.

Williams Syndrome Support Foundation website https://williams-syndrome.ru/

VKontakte open community for parents of children with WS https://vk.com/ws_russia_together

Center for Curative Pedagogics — assistance for parents and specialists https://ccp.org.ru/

Legal support for parents https://www.osoboepravo.ru/

Williams Syndrome Association (USA)

Website: http://www.williams-syndrome.org

Williams Syndrome Foundation Worldwide Web

http://www.wsf.org

The website lists support organizations in various countries at: http://www.wsf.org/family/support/orgsint.htm

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Not applicable.

Scales and calculators from this guideline

QTc — corrected QTCorrected QT using 4 formulas: Bazett, Fridericia, Framingham, Hodges

If you practice in the specialty "Medical Genetics"

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer using the "Williams Syndrome" guideline and other active Russian Ministry of Health clinical guidelines with references to specific sections, rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines