Congenital Multiple Arthrogryposis: Clinical Guidelines

Applies toadults, children2026 editionQ74.3, Q74.8

Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults, children. 2026 edition, ICD-10 codes: Q74.3, Q74.8.

Receive research articles on "Congenital Multiple Arthrogryposis"Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in English, with figures, sample sizes, and conclusions. Plus updates to Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary of the guideline text, 2026 edition. Each point links to the original section — verify with it before prescribing.

Congenital multiple arthrogryposis (CMA) is a group of conditions characterized by congenital joint contractures affecting two or more body parts. The guidelines focus on identifying causes and associated disorders, early correction of contractures, surgical treatment of deformities, and long-term rehabilitation.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Suspect CMA in the presence of contractures of two or more joints in non-contiguous areas from birth. Clarify the family history and the absence of contracture progression. → in text
  2. Perform an examination by a geneticist, trauma surgeon/orthopedic surgeon, and neurologist. Assess the distribution and pattern of contractures, muscle strength and tone, deformities of the limbs, spine, and craniofacial region, skin dimples, and motor development (Level of Reliable Evidence C, Level of Diagnostic Validity 5). → in text
  3. Test for CK. High CK activity—more than 10 times the upper limit—is observed in muscular dystrophies combined with congenital contractures (Level of Reliable Evidence C, Level of Diagnostic Validity 5). In the presence of ptosis, ocular motility disorders, involvement of bulbar and respiratory muscles, generalized weakness, and hypotonia, determine acetylcholine receptor antibodies (Level of Reliable Evidence C, Level of Diagnostic Validity 5). → in text
  4. Perform radiography of the upper and lower extremities to assess bone and joint deformities. In cases of scoliosis, perform radiography of the thoracic and lumbar spine in two projections for dynamic monitoring (Level of Reliable Evidence C, Level of Diagnostic Validity 5). → in text
  5. Perform stimulation, needle, or surface ENMG to determine the level of nervous system lesions and the state of the neuromuscular apparatus (Level of Reliable Evidence C, Level of Diagnostic Validity 5). → in text
  6. If CNS malformations are suspected, perform MRI of the brain and one spinal cord segment; if CNS involvement is suspected or for dynamic monitoring, perform EEG. Muscle biopsy is reserved for cases where the diagnosis is difficult to establish by other methods (Level of Reliable Evidence C, Level of Diagnostic Validity 5). → in text
  7. If signs of arthrogryposis are detected at 12 weeks of gestation, as well as in the presence of a burdened family history, additional expert fetal ultrasound is performed at 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 weeks (Level of Reliable Evidence B, Level of Diagnostic Validity 3). → in text
  8. Fetal MRI is performed after 17–18 weeks of gestation as an adjunct to ultrasound when fetal malformations are suspected (Level of Reliable Evidence C, Level of Diagnostic Validity 5). → in text
  9. Molecular genetic diagnostics are performed in the presence of a burdened family history and pathological signs on ultrasound (Level of Reliable Evidence C, Level of Diagnostic Validity 5). → in text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

Which sign is most important for the diagnosis of CMA?

Multiple congenital joint contractures of two or more non-contiguous areas that do not progress and do not occur in previously unaffected joints. There is no single "gold standard" for diagnosis. → in text

Which laboratory test helps differentiate CMA from a neuromuscular disorder?

CK testing is used. High CK activity—more than 10 times the upper limit—is observed in muscular dystrophies with congenital contractures. → in text

Which instrumental test helps differentiate CMA from a neuromuscular disorder?

ENMG is used to determine the level of nervous system involvement and assess the state of the neuromuscular apparatus. → in text

When should treatment for a child with arthrogryposis begin?

If the somatic condition is stable, as early as the first week of life. Conservative treatment is especially effective under the age of 3–6 months; exercises with parents are performed at least four times a day for 30 minutes. → in text

Can a hip dislocation be reduced by closed reduction in CMA?

No, closed reduction is not performed: it often fails to achieve reduction and can lead to avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Hip dislocation is considered an indication for surgery. → in text

How is pregnancy managed when fetal AMC is suspected?

Regular and more frequent fetal ultrasound examinations are performed, along with measures aimed at stimulating fetal motor activity. When arthrogryposis is diagnosed prenatally, delivery by Caesarean section is recommended to prevent intranatal trauma to the fetus and mother. → in text

When is fetal MRI performed in cases of suspected malformations?

Fetal MRI is performed after 17–18 weeks of gestation as a supplement to ultrasound. → in text

When is molecular genetic testing performed for prenatal diagnosis?

The test is performed in the presence of a burdened family history and signs of pathology on ultrasound. → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
1068, revision 1 (ID 1068_1)
Publication date
August 31, 2026
Age category
adults, children
ICD-10 codes
Q74.3Q74.8
Specialties
Traumatology and OrthopedicsMedical GeneticsNeurology
Developers
Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedists of Russia
Association of Medical Geneticists
Regional Public Organization "Society of Neuromuscular Disease Specialists"
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Guidelines — 1068_1

List of Abbreviations

AMC — arthrogryposis multiplex congenita.

DA — distal arthrogryposis.

SMA — spinal muscular atrophy.

EMG — electromyography.

ENMG — electroneuromyography.

CT — computed tomography.

MRI — magnetic resonance imaging.

PT — physical therapy.

US — ultrasound examination.

CTG — cardiotocography.

ECG — electrocardiography.

CNS — central nervous system.

IPRA — individual rehabilitation and habilitation program.

AR — autosomal recessive.

AD — autosomal dominant.

LoE — levels of evidence.

GoR — grades of recommendation.

POO — prosthetics and orthotics.

ATD — assistive technology devices.

Terms and Definitions

Akinesia — inability to perform voluntary movements or alteration in their strength, range, or speed.

Amyoplasia — the most common form of arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC).

Embryogenesis — the formation and development of the embryo.

Genotype — the set of genes of a given organism.

Phenotype — the set of characteristics exhibited by an individual at a specific stage of development.

Contracture — limitation of passive movement in a joint.

Mutation (nucleotide sequence variant) — a permanent change in the nucleotide sequence of the genome.

Inversion — a change in the orientation of chromosome segments.

Reciprocal translocation — transfer of a chromosomal segment to a non-homologous chromosome.

Chromosomal aberrations — anomalies in the structure or number of chromosomes.

Deletion — loss of genetic material from one or more chromosomes.

Duplication — doubling of a part of the genetic material of one or more chromosomes.

ICD-10 — International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision.

Intrauterine growth restriction — a condition in which a fetus fails to achieve its optimal growth potential during pregnancy.

Myopathies — chronically progressive neuromuscular disorders characterized by primary muscle involvement.

Assistive technology devices — devices containing technical solutions, including special ones, used to compensate for or eliminate permanent restrictions on the daily activities of a person with a disability.

Prosthetic and orthotic devices are technical rehabilitation means used to compensate for or eliminate persistent disabilities.

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Congenital multiple arthrogryposis (CMA) is a term used to describe a group of disorders characterized by congenital joint contractures in two or more body parts [1].

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

The occurrence of arthrogryposis is associated with restricted fetal movement (fetal akinesia), with a correlation between the severity of contractures and the duration of restricted fetal motor activity: the longer this duration, the more severe the contractures. Loss of fetal muscle function leads to fetal akinesia and, secondarily, to joint contractures. At the same time, restriction of joint movement secondarily leads to muscle atrophy and the formation of contractures [2]. Fixation of the joint in a forced position is associated with excessive proliferation of connective tissue in the joint capsule, which occurs compensatorily due to the lack of fetal movement [3]. A possible cause of fetal akinesia is ischemia of the anterior horn cells of the spinal cord due to vascular disorders and impaired muscle tissue development [2]. In most cases, joint formation is not impaired during embryogenesis; however, the lack of movement secondarily leads to joint deformity and changes in periarticular tissues [1, 4]. The main causes of CMA are:

  1. genetic factors (currently, over 400 genes associated with this pathology have been identified; resulting mutations lead to damage to the motor neurons of the anterior horns of the spinal cord, muscle cells, impaired neuromuscular transmission, etc.).

  2. maternal diseases (myasthenia gravis, arterial hypotension, diabetes);

  3. environmental factors, including bacterial and viral infections (Zika virus, cytomegalovirus infection, rubella virus, etc.), substance use (cocaine, etc.), etc.;

  4. mechanical factors limiting fetal movement (oligohydramnios, uterine malformations (bicornuate uterus), uterine myoma (fibroid), multiple pregnancy, presence of amniotic bands, etc.) [1-2, 5-6].

Amyoplasia occurs sporadically as a result of vascular disorders arising during embryogenesis, whereas distal forms are often classified as hereditary diseases [7].

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

According to R.B. Lowry et al. (2010), the incidence of arthrogryposis is 1 case per 3,000–5,000 live births [8]. The most common type of arthrogryposis is amyoplasia, which is a sporadic, non-progressive disorder occurring at a rate of 1 case per 10,000 live births [4].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

Q74.3 – Congenital multiple arthrogryposis

Q74.8 – Other specified congenital malformations of limb(s)

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

M. Bamshad et al. (1996) subdivide arthrogryposis into three groups: amyoplasia; distal forms of arthrogryposis; and congenital multiple contractures that are symptoms of syndromes caused by central nervous system damage, as well as various neuromuscular disorders [9].

According to Hall's classification, 3 types of CMA are distinguished:

• Type I - amyoplasia (the most common type of CMA) is characterized by limb involvement only;

• Type II - limb involvement combined with anomalies of other systems;

• Type III - damage to the neuromuscular apparatus combined with central nervous system dysfunction or intellectual disability [10].

In type II CMA, anomalies of the cardiovascular system, respiratory system, gastrointestinal tract, urogenital system, visual organs, and ENT organs are noted [11].

Distal arthrogryposes are a group of genetic disorders predominantly with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, characterized by involvement of the distal limbs (hands and feet). Depending on the type of disease, typical facial anomalies and varying degrees of involvement of other body parts are characteristic [4].

M. Bamshad et al. (1996) revised and expanded the classification of the most common types of distal arthrogryposis proposed by J. Hall in 1982, identifying 9 types [9]. M. Bamshad's classification (2009) presents 10 types of distal arthrogryposis [12]. Currently, more than 12 different types have already been described (Table 1).

Table 1 Classification of distal arthrogryposis types

Name

Synonym

Abbreviated name

Gene

OMIM

Distal arthrogryposis type 1 A, B, C

Digitotalar dysmorphism

DA 1A

DA 1B

DA 1C

TPM2

MYBPC1

MYL11

108120

614335

619110

Distal arthrogryposis type 2A

Freeman-Sheldon syndrome

DA 2A

MYH3

193700

Distal arthrogryposis type 2B

Sheldon-Hall syndrome

DA 2B1

DA 2B2

DA 2B3

DA 2B4

TNNI2

TNNT3

MYH3

TPM2

601680

618435

618436

108120

Distal arthrogryposis type 3

Gordon syndrome

DA 3

PIEZO2

114300

Distal arthrogryposis type 4

With severe scoliosis

DA 4

-

609128

Distal arthrogryposis type 5

With ophthalmoplegia and retinopathy

DA 5

PIEZO2

108145

Distal arthrogryposis type 5D

With ptosis and facial dysmorphisms without ophthalmoplegia

DA 5D

ECEL1

615065

Distal arthrogryposis type 6

With sensorineural hearing loss

DA 6

-

108200

Distal arthrogryposis type 7

Trismus-pseudocamptodactyly syndrome (Hecht syndrome)

DA 7

MYH8

158300

Distal arthrogryposis type 8

Autosomal dominant multiple pterygium syndrome

DA 8

MYH3

178110

Distal arthrogryposis type 9

Beals syndrome, congenital contractural arachnodactyly

DA 9

FBN2

121050

Distal arthrogryposis type 10

With equinus contracture

DA 10

-

187370

Distal arthrogryposis type 11

With camptodactyly, absence of flexion creases over the interphalangeal joints of the fingers, and limited forearm supination

DA 11

MET

620019

Distal arthrogryposis type 12

With spinal rigidity, scoliosis, and orthodontic anomalies

DA 12

ADAMTS15

620545

Phenotypic series of distal arthrogryposis are presented in the OMIM database [13]. The absolute majority of distal arthrogryposises are inherited in an autosomal dominant manner, with only two types—DA5D (ECEL1) and DA12 (ADAMTS15)—being inherited in an autosomal recessive manner.

Distal arthrogryposis type 1, digitotalar dysmorphism (OMIM 108120). There are 3 genetic variants: type 1A includes cases associated with mutations in the TPM2 gene (9p13.3) encoding β-tropomyosin; type 1B includes mutations in the MYBPC1 gene (12q23.2), whose protein product is myosin-binding protein C; and type 1C includes mutations in the MYL11 gene (MYLPF) encoding the fast-twitch skeletal muscle regulatory light chain. Inheritance pattern: autosomal dominant, with autosomal recessive patients described for DA1C. Distinctive features: camptodactyly, foot deformity. Contractures of the distal limbs—hands (camptodactyly, ulnar deviation of the wrists, flexion contracture of the thumb, poorly defined palmar creases, absence of interphalangeal creases) and feet (clubfoot—25%, pes planovalgus—33%) of varying severity. Involvement of proximal joints (shoulders and hips) is an inconsistent feature. Facial dysmorphisms, micrognathia, and limitation of mouth opening may be present. Other organs and systems are usually unaffected. Intrafamilial variability of clinical manifestations is characteristic.

Distal arthrogryposis type 2A, Freeman-Sheldon syndrome, craniocarpotarsal dysplasia (OMIM 193700). Most cases are caused by mutations in the MYH3 gene located in segment 17p13.1, encoding one of the heavy chain isoforms of myosin. Inheritance pattern: autosomal dominant. Distinctive features: contractures of the orofacial muscles lead to the formation of a phenotype resembling a "whistling face": a wide prominent forehead, a mask-like face, and a small mouth with lips pursed as if whistling; in addition, ulnar deviation of the fingers, camptodactyly, and foot deformity are characteristic. Signs of facial dysmorphism: prominent forehead and superciliary arches, mask-like flat face, long philtrum, H- or V-shaped chin dimple, hypertelorism, deep-set eyes, blepharophimosis, ptosis, downslanting palpebral fissures, epicanthus, strabismus, alar hypoplasia, short nose and wide nasal bridge, prominent nasolabial folds, microstomia, and "pursed" lips. Other: small tongue and jaw, high palate, swallowing difficulties, speech problems (nasal voice). Signs of skeletal involvement: short neck, kyphoscoliosis (84%), hip dislocation, shoulder and knee joint contractures (73%), camptodactyly (88%), ulnar deviation of the fingers (91%), thumb flexion contracture, severe pes planovalgus ("rocker-bottom foot") or clubfoot (59%).

Distal arthrogryposis type 2B, Sheldon-Hall syndrome (OMIM 601680). Sheldon-Hall syndrome is caused by mutations in the TNNI2 (type 2B1) and TNNT3 (type 2B2) genes localized in segment 11p15.5 and encoding troponin I and troponin T isoforms, respectively. In some cases, type 2B is caused by mutations in the MYH3 gene (type 2B3) (segment 17p13.1) encoding embryonic myosin heavy chain 3, and the TPM2 gene (type 2B4) (segment 9p13.3) encoding β-tropomyosin (it is an allelic disorder to DA 1). Inheritance pattern: autosomal dominant. Distinctive features: characteristic facial dysmorphisms—triangular face with prominent nasolabial folds, downslanting palpebral fissures, microstomia, and a prominent chin; camptodactyly, ulnar deviation of the fingers, foot deformity. Signs of facial dysmorphism: triangular face, long philtrum, prominent nasolabial folds, microstomia, temporomandibular joint contracture (type 2B3), small prominent chin, micrognathia, downslanting palpebral fissures, wide nasal bridge, fused earlobe. Signs of skeletal involvement: neck skin folds, scoliosis (type 2B3), hip dislocation (type 2B2), wrist extension contracture, severe camptodactyly, ulnar deviation of the fingers, thumb flexion contracture, absence of skin creases over the interphalangeal joints of the fingers, foot deformity: types 2B1 and 2B3—clubfoot, type 2B2—severe pes planovalgus ("rocker-bottom foot").

Distal arthrogryposis type 3, Gordon syndrome (OMIM 114300). The syndrome is caused by heterozygous mutations in the PIEZO2 gene, which is localized to the 18p11 segment. Inheritance pattern: autosomal dominant. Distinctive features: short stature, short neck, cleft palate, camptodactyly, clubfoot. Signs of facial dysmorphism: micrognathia, slight facial asymmetry, ptosis, epicanthus, ophthalmoplegia (rare), cleft palate or high-arched palate. Signs of skeletal involvement: short stature, short neck, cervical skin folds, low hairline, sloping shoulders, pectus excavatum, kyphoscoliosis, lumbar hyperlordosis, congenital hip dislocation, knee flexion contractures, short fingers, camptodactyly, cutaneous syndactyly, clubfoot. Signs of muscle involvement: diffuse hypotrophy with predominant involvement of the leg muscles. Other: Chiari malformation type I, mild intellectual disability, cryptorchidism.

Distal arthrogryposis type 4, with severe scoliosis (OMIM 609128). Inheritance pattern: autosomal dominant. The gene has not been identified. Distinctive features: scoliosis that progresses with age. Signs of facial dysmorphism: frontal hypoplasia, low anterior and posterior hairlines, nystagmus, depressed nasal bridge. Signs of skeletal involvement: craniosynostosis/skull asymmetry, torticollis (bony forms), camptodactyly, syndactyly, ulnar deviation of the hands, clubfoot, plano-valgus foot deformity.

Distal arthrogryposis type 5, with ocular motor abnormalities and retinopathy (OMIM 108145). The etiological factor is heterozygous mutations in the PIEZO2 gene, localized to the 18p11 region. Inheritance pattern: autosomal dominant. Distinctive features: blepharophimosis, ophthalmoplegia, retinopathy, ptosis, camptodactyly, clubfoot, restrictive lung disease. Signs of facial dysmorphism: triangular expressionless face, ophthalmoplegia, deep-set eyes, epicanthus, blepharophimosis, ptosis, hyperopia (rare), retinitis pigmentosa, Duane syndrome, strabismus, astigmatism, keratoglobus or keratoconus, limitation of mouth opening. Signs of skeletal involvement: pectus excavatum, scoliosis (rare), restriction of forearm rotation and wrist extension, camptodactyly, long fingers, clinodactyly, clubfoot, signs of muscle involvement (decreased muscle mass, firm muscles). Poorly formed palmar creases, dimples over major joints, restrictive lung disease.

Distal arthrogryposis type 5D (OMIM 615065). The development of the syndrome is associated with biallelic variants in the ECEL1 gene (chromosomal segment 2q37.1), whose protein product is endothelin-converting enzyme 1, necessary for proper intramuscular branching of motor neuron axons in skeletal muscles during embryogenesis. Inheritance pattern: autosomal recessive. Distinctive features: round face, arched eyebrows, unilateral or asymmetric ptosis, micrognathia, congenital hip dislocation, knee extension contractures, severe camptodactyly, clubfoot. Signs of facial dysmorphism: round, expressionless face, micrognathia, arched eyebrows, unilateral ptosis or more prominent on one side, bulbous nose, cleft palate. Signs of skeletal involvement: short neck, mild to severe scoliosis (rare), bilateral hip dislocation (rare), contractures of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and knee (extension) joints, severe camptodactyly, adduction of the thumb, flat-valgus foot, clubfoot (rare). Signs of muscle involvement: muscle mass hypotrophy (predominantly in the lower extremities).

Distal arthrogryposis type 6, with sensorineural hearing loss (OMIM 108200). Inheritance pattern: autosomal dominant. The etiological gene for this type remains unidentified. Distinctive features: sensorineural hearing loss, upper limb contractures. Signs of skeletal involvement: microcephaly, camptodactyly.

Distal arthrogryposis type 7, trismus-pseudocamptodactyly syndrome, Hecht syndrome (OMIM 158300). Caused by a recurrent variant in the MYH8 gene located on chromosome 17p13.1, which encodes the perinatal myosin heavy chain 8. Inheritance pattern: autosomal dominant. Distinctive features: trismus, pseudocamptodactyly (limited extension in the interphalangeal joints of the hand only upon dorsal extension), hip dislocation, clubfoot. Facial dysmorphism features: micrognathia, long chin (rare), ptosis, limited mouth opening (trismus). Skeletal involvement features: hip dislocation, limited forearm supination, pseudocamptodactyly, clubfoot or metatarsus adductus, pes planovalgus. Muscle involvement features: shortening of the flexor digitorum profundus, shortening of the gastrocnemius muscle.

Distal arthrogryposis type 8, multiple pterygium syndrome (OMIM 178110). Caused by a mutation in the MYH3 gene (segment 9p13.3) encoding the embryonic myosin heavy chain 3. Inheritance pattern: most commonly autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant also occurs. Distinctive features: multiple joint contractures with pterygia: cervical, elbow, popliteal, axillary pterygium; camptodactyly, minor facial anomalies. Facial dysmorphism features: micrognathia, long philtrum, antimongoloid slant of the eyes, epicanthus, ptosis, low-set ears, cleft palate, and downturned corners of the mouth. Skeletal involvement features: short stature, multiple joint contractures with pterygia, kyphoscoliosis and vertebral fusion (frequently), rib fusion, hip dislocation, absence of the patella. Males may present with cryptorchidism and a small penis, females with hypoplastic labia majora.

Distal arthrogryposis type 9, Beals syndrome, congenital contractural arachnodactyly (OMIM 121050). The syndrome is caused by mutations in the FBN2 gene (5q23) encoding the glycoprotein fibrillin-2, a key regulator of elastic fiber assembly during early embryogenesis, which is essential for the proper formation and function of connective tissue elastic fibers. Inheritance pattern: autosomal dominant. Distinctive features: Marfanoid phenotype, arachnodactyly, camptodactyly, deformed auricles, joint contractures, kyphoscoliosis, foot deformities, osteopenia. Facial dysmorphism features: micrognathia (27%), prominent frontal eminences, " crumpled" ear (76%): prominent crus of the helix, helical folds; lens ectopia, myopia, high-arched palate (28%), relatively short neck. Skeletal involvement features: cranial deformation (scaphocephaly, brachycephaly, or dolichocephaly), dolichostenomelia, congenital kyphoscoliosis (45%), contractures of the hip (25%), elbow (86%), and knee (81%) joints, patellar subluxation, arachnodactyly, camptodactyly, ulnar deviation of the fingers, metatarsus adductus or clubfoot (32%). Joint contractures frequently tend to resolve spontaneously with age. Additionally, osteopenia, gastrocnemius muscle hypoplasia, aortic aneurysm in approximately 15–20% of cases, lens subluxation, variable degrees of myopia, and congenital heart defects (atrial and ventricular septal defects, aortic root dilatation, mitral valve regurgitation) are observed.

Distal arthrogryposis type 10, with equinus contracture (OMIM 187370). The causative gene has not been identified. Inheritance pattern: autosomal dominant. Distinctive features: equinus or equinovarus foot deformity, causing children to walk on tiptoe. Skeletal involvement features: camptodactyly, knee, elbow, and wrist contractures are rare and mild.

Distal arthrogryposis type 11, with camptodactyly, absence of skin creases over the interphalangeal joints of the fingers, and limited forearm supination (OMIM 620019). Caused by mutations in the MET gene, which belongs to the receptor protein kinase family. Inheritance pattern: autosomal dominant. Distinctive features: isolated involvement of the upper extremities, absence of flexion creases, limited forearm supination. Skeletal involvement features: camptodactyly, limited forearm supination, wrist contractures. Facial, spinal, and lower extremity involvement is absent [14].

Distal arthrogryposis type 12, with spinal rigidity, scoliosis, and orthodontic anomalies (OMIM 620542). The syndrome is associated with biallelic variants in the ADAMTS15 gene (chromosomal segment 11q24.3), whose protein product belongs to the metalloproteinase family, which plays an important role in connective tissue homeostasis. Inheritance pattern: autosomal recessive. Distinctive features: hypoplasia or absence of flexion creases of the distal fingers, kyphoscoliosis and/or spinal rigidity, microstomia, dental crowding, tooth agenesis. Facial dysmorphism features: micrognathia, microstomia, high-arched palate, dental crowding, or tooth agenesis. Skeletal involvement features: contractures of the interphalangeal joints of the fingers and toes, clinodactyly of the fifth finger, knee and ankle contractures, spinal involvement manifesting as kyphoscoliosis and spinal rigidity. Central nervous system or other organ involvement is absent [15].

E. Kimber's classification (2012) divides all types of distal arthrogryposis into groups based on their pathogenesis:

  1. Syndromes caused by muscle contractile protein dysfunction resulting from mutations in the TPM2, TNNI2, TNNT3, MYH8, MYH3 genes: distal arthrogryposis types 1, 2A, 2B, 7, and 8. In addition, distal arthrogryposis types 4, 6, and 10 share clinical features similar to the aforementioned types.

  2. Syndromes caused by connective tissue protein dysfunction resulting from mutations in the fibrillin FBN2 gene: distal arthrogryposis type 9.

  3. Syndromes caused by somatosensory neuron ion channel protein dysfunction resulting from mutations in the PIEZO2 gene: distal arthrogryposis types 3 and 5. There is a clinically similar entity to PIEZO2-related disorders, namely distal arthrogryposis type 5D, associated with a mutation in the ECEL1 gene [16].

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

Signs and symptoms characteristic of CMA:

- multiple congenital contractures of two or more joints in non-contiguous body parts;

- contractures do not progress over the course of life;

- contractures do not develop in previously unaffected joints;

- muscle hypotonia;

- spinal deformities (present at birth or developing over time);

- possible combined involvement of the central nervous system, respiratory system, gastrointestinal tract, and urogenital system;

- intelligence is preserved (may be reduced in case of central nervous system involvement);

- sensitivity is preserved;

- ability to walk and perform self-care varies [1].

Amyoplasia is the most common form of CMA, presenting with characteristic clinical manifestations:

- internal rotation contractures of the shoulders;

- extension contractures of the elbows;

- flexion contractures of the wrists with ulnar deviation, flexion contractures of the fingers, flexion-adduction contracture of the thumb;

- contractures and dislocations of the hips;

- flexion or extension contractures of the knees;

- foot deformities (most commonly clubfoot) [1].

In amyoplasia, all four limbs are involved in 63% of cases (i.e., upper and lower extremity joint contractures are typically symmetrical); three limb involvement is observed in 5% of cases, upper limb involvement in 17%, and lower limb involvement only in 15% [17]. Gastroschisis is observed in 9% of patients with amyoplasia, hand and foot malformations in 12%, and limb/finger constriction rings in 4.3% [18].

DA comprises a group of syndromes characterized by specific phenotypes [12]. Individuals with DA primarily exhibit hand and foot joint contractures, along with other anomalies specific to each syndrome [18].

1.6.1 Differential Diagnosis

There are over 400 diseases and syndromes characterized by contractures involving two or more joint levels.

First and foremost, it is necessary to differentiate from neuromuscular disorders accompanied by congenital joint contractures resulting from neuromuscular apparatus dysfunction. Important criteria for differential diagnosis include the clinical picture, changes in creatine kinase (CK) levels, and the results of ENMG (needle electromyography of a single muscle, stimulation electroneuromyography of a single nerve, needle electroneuromyography of a single nerve).

Congenital muscular dystrophies — a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by specific pathomorphological changes in skeletal muscles. In most cases, the disease begins after birth or in early childhood with marked muscle hypotonia ("floppy infant") and muscle weakness, accompanied by primary myopathic changes in muscle fibers. In some cases, respiratory muscle weakness is observed. Children show significant delays in motor development compared to their peers; deep tendon reflexes are frequently reduced or absent. Patients often present with scoliosis, flatfoot with valgus deformity, and hip dislocations. Elevated creatine kinase (CK) levels and a primary myopathic pattern on electroneuromyography (ENMG) may be observed [19, 20].

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) — a genetically heterogeneous neuromuscular disorder affecting the anterior horns of the spinal cord and motor nuclei of the brainstem, leading to progressive muscle atrophy and weakness. The development of congenital contractures is caused by impaired intrauterine muscle denervation. Although 5q-SMA is the most common form of SMA, congenital contractures occur in type 0 5q-SMA. If ENMG reveals spinal motor neuron involvement and SMN1 gene variants are absent, differential diagnosis should be pursued with other forms of SMA (X-linked SMA, autosomal recessive distal SMA, etc.) [21].

Differential diagnosis should also be performed with a group of hereditary skeletal dysplasias accompanied by congenital joint contractures:

Diastrophic dysplasia — a type of skeletal dysplasia characterized by impaired formation of certain types of cartilage tissue and associated hindered endochondral bone formation. The disease is caused by pathogenic variants in the SLC26A2 gene located on the long arm of chromosome 5 and is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. Symptoms appear at birth: reduced birth length, flexion contractures of the hip and knee joints, scoliosis, stiffness of the interphalangeal joints, short fingers, and clubfoot (equinovarus deformity). Other early postnatal manifestations include inflammation of the auricular cartilage developing in the first months of life, subsequently leading to auricular deformity. Patients have short stature [4, 22].

Epiphyseal dysplasias — a genetically heterogeneous group of severe hereditary systemic skeletal disorders based on impaired endochondral ossification with predominant involvement of the epiphyses of long tubular bones (delayed ossification, deformation [flattening], tendency toward aseptic necrosis) and vertebrae (delayed ossification, platyspondyly, degenerative changes in intervertebral discs). These changes lead to the early development of osteoarthritis in large joints and spinal osteochondrosis. Clinically, patients exhibit contractures of the knee, elbow, and hip joints, scoliosis, and below-average height [4, 22].

Larsen syndrome is manifested by multiple dislocations of large joints combined with signs of facial dysmorphism (hypertelorism, flat facies, prominent forehead, depressed nasal bridge, etc.) and cylindrical fingers. The classic form of the syndrome is caused by pathogenic variants in the FLNB gene and is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner; more severe recessive variants have also been described. According to most researchers, recessive forms of Larsen syndrome are most commonly associated with congenital anomalies (choanal atresia, aplasia of the right kidney and gallbladder, agenesis of the corpus callosum, and congenital heart defects). Lethal forms of the syndrome reveal marked chest hypoplasia leading to secondary pulmonary hypoplasia [4, 22].

Metatropic dysplasia — a rare spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia whose classic variant is characterized by changing body proportions with age: newborns exhibit rhizomelic limb shortening with a relatively normal trunk length, but as the child grows, due to vertebral involvement and progressive kyphoscoliosis, trunk shortening becomes more pronounced, resulting in a severely disproportionate short stature. In newborns, the chest is narrow and elongated, later becoming barrel-shaped and pectus carinatum; progressive kyphoscoliosis, flexion contractures of large joints combined with small joint hypermobility, and brachydactyly are typical, along with characteristic radiological changes (pronounced platyspondyly, dumbbell-shaped deformation of long tubular bones, "halberd-shaped" iliac wings) [4, 22].

Marfan syndrome — an inherited connective tissue disorder with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern, caused by pathogenic variants in the FBN1 gene encoding the glycoprotein fibrillin-1. The disease is characterized by high but incomplete penetrance and marked variability of clinical expression. In classic cases, tall stature, limb elongation (dolichostenomelia), elongated fingers and toes (arachnodactyly), and a deficiency of subcutaneous adipose tissue are observed. Musculoskeletal features include elongation of the skeletal tubular bones, chest deformities, scoliosis, joint hypermobility, and a tendency toward dislocations. The most significant visceral manifestations include progressive aortic root dilation and/or aortic aneurysm, as well as ectopia lentis [4, 22].

Bruck syndrome — a combination of congenital multiple arthrogryposis and osteogenesis imperfecta. Clinically characterized by congenital contractures of large joints and multiple bone fractures starting in infancy or early childhood. Additional features include postnatal short stature due to limb contractures and deformities, pterygium, and progressive scoliosis. Intellect, vision, and hearing are preserved. There are two types of Bruck syndrome: type I, caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in the FKBP10 gene, and type II, associated with biallelic variants in the PLOD2 gene [18, 23].

Differential diagnosis with other, less frequent disorders phenotypically similar to congenital muscular dystrophies is presented in Table 2 [4, 13].

Table 2. Differential diagnosis of congenital muscular dystrophies

Limb involvement

Musculoskeletal and other organ involvement

Musculoskeletal and CNS involvement (intellectual disability or lethal cases)

Pterygium of the elbow joints (Schinzel-Giedion syndrome); AD

Aarskog-Scott syndrome (FGD1); X-linked recessive

(OMIM #305400)

Abruzzo-Erickson syndrome (TBX22); X-linked recessive

(OMIM #302905)

Bruck syndrome (PLOD2; FKBP10); AR

(OMIM #259450, 609220)

Diastrophic dysplasia (SLC26A2); AR (OMIM #222600)

Acrocallosal syndrome (KIF7) Ac; AR (OMIM #302905)

Camptodactyly (multiple types); AD (OMIM #114200)

Ectodermal dysplasia with contractures; AR

Adenylosuccinate lyase deficiency (ADSL); AR (OMIM #103050)

Radioulnar synostosis

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (CHST14, DSE); AR (OMIM #601776, 615539)

Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (TREX1; SAMHD1; RNASEH2A; RNASEH2B; RNASEH2C); AD, AR

Liebenberg syndrome (upper limb involvement) (PITX1); AD

(OMIM #186550)

Hand-foot-genital syndrome (HOXA1); AD

(OMIM #140000)

Bartsocas-Papas syndrome (RIPK4); AR (OMIM #263650)

Lower limb involvement (Fleury type) (TRPV4); BP

Hanhart syndrome, sporadic cases

Dandy-Walker malformation (OMIM # 220200)

Meningomyelocele

Kniest dysplasia

(COL2A1) – AD (OMIM #156550)

Campomelic dysplasia (SOX9); AD (OMIM #114290)

Mesomelic dysplasia (SHOX; SULF1); AD

Larsen syndrome (FLNB); AD (OMIM #150250)

Pena-Shokeir syndrome (ERCC6; ERCC2; ERCC5; ERCC1); AR (OMIM #214150)

Patellar aplasia/hypoplasia; AD (OMIM #168860)

Marfan syndrome, severe neonatal form (FBN1); AD

(OMIM #154700)

Rhizomelic chondrodysplasia punctata (PEX7); AR (OMIM #215100)

Poland syndrome; AD (OMIM #173800)

Metaphyseal chondrodysplasia (PTHLH); AD (OMIM #156400)

Genitopatellar syndrome (KAT6B); AD (OMIM #606170)

Symphalangism, brachydactyly; AD, AR

Metatropic dysplasia (TRPV4); AD

(OMIM #156530)

Fraser syndrome (MED12); X-linked recessive (OMIM #309520)

Nail-patella syndrome (LMX1B); AD (OMIM #161200)

Gelorphysic dysplasia (ADAMTSL2; FBN1; LTBP3); AR, AD

Tuberous sclerosis (TSC1; TSC2); AD (OMIM #191100; 613254)

Marden-Walker syndrome (PIEZO2); AD

(OMIM #248700)

Van den Ende-Gupta syndrome (SCARF2); AR (OMIM #600920)

Lethal congenital contracture syndrome (PIP5K1C); AR (OMIM #611369)

Waardenburg syndrome (PAX3); AD

(OMIM #193500)

Martsolf syndrome (RAB3GAP2; RAB3GAP1; RAB18); AR (OMIM #212720)

Winchester syndrome (MMP2); AR

(OMIM #259600)

Congenital myasthenic syndromes (RAPSN; CHRNB1; MUSK and others)

Myelinopathies with multiple congenital contractures (MPZ; PMP22); AD

Myotonic dystrophy type 1; AD

(OMIM #160900)

Osteogenesis imperfecta (type II) (COL1A2; COL1A1; FKBP10); AR and AD

Oro-facio-digital syndrome (OFD1); X-linked dominant

Spinal muscular atrophy 5q type 0 (SMN1); AR

(OMIM #600354)

Spinal muscular atrophy with respiratory distress type 1 (IGHMBP2); AR (OMIM #604320)

TARP syndrome (RBM10); AR

Wiedemann-Rautenstrauch syndrome (ZC4H2); X-linked

(OMIM #314580)

Zellweger syndrome (PEX1; PEX2; PEX3; PEX5; PEX6; PEX12; PEX14; PEX26); AR

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

Currently, there is no single "gold standard" diagnostic method for AMC. The primary sign of the disease is the presence in a newborn of multiple contractures in two or more non-adjacent joint areas, which do not progress over the course of life.

Main criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition:                    

based on pathognomonic findings:

1) anamnesis (family history is absent in amyoplasia and positive in syndromic forms of AMC; absence of contracture progression during the patient's life);

2) physical examination (presence of multiple congenital contractures of two or more non-adjacent joint areas).

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

Medical specialists consulted by children with joint contractures should consider this diagnosis in all cases involving congenital contractures.

Signs and symptoms that warrant suspected AMC — see subsection 1.6.

2.2 Physical Examination

It is recommended that all patients undergo a genetic counseling consultation, especially those with a burdened family history (Genetic counseling (examination, consultation)) [17-22].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comments: genealogical data analysis in patients with congenital contractures to identify the hereditary nature of the disease, though it should be kept in mind that de novo mutations are possible (parents are not carriers).

It is recommended that all patients with multiple congenital contractures consult an orthopedic traumatologist and a neurologist to detect musculoskeletal and nervous system pathology (Orthopedic traumatologist consultation (examination), Neurologist consultation (examination)) [30-32].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comments: upon patient examination, it is necessary to pay attention to the localization, extent, and nature of joint contractures; assess muscle strength and tone; and note the presence or absence of other clinical signs characteristic of AMC: skin dimples over the joints; deformities of the limbs, spine, skull, and maxillofacial region; presence of a hemangioma in the glabella and forehead region; and delayed motor development of the child (clinical manifestations depend on age).

It is recommended that patients with type 2 AMC undergo examinations by other specialists (cardiologist, pediatric cardiologist, gastroenterologist consultations, etc.) as clinically indicated based on comorbid conditions to identify associated pathologies [1].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: the frequency and nature of the examination depend on the existing pathology (medical indications).

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

It is recommended that patients with congenital contractures undergo blood tests for creatine kinase (CK) levels/isoenzyme activity to perform differential diagnosis and clarify the diagnosis [33].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comments: high CK activity (more than 10-fold) is observed in muscular dystrophies combined with congenital limb joint contractures [33].

It is recommended that patients presenting with ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, bulbar and respiratory muscle involvement, generalized weakness, and hypotonia undergo serological testing—determination of acetylcholine receptor antibodies to rule out autoimmune myasthenia gravis (myasthenia gravis) [34].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comments: the presence of maternal anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies in an infant may indicate transient neonatal myasthenia gravis.

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

It is recommended that patients with congenital contractures undergo radiography of the upper and lower extremities to diagnose the nature of the pathology [30-32].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: this study allows for the detection of bone deformities and developmental anomalies (e.g., synostoses), joint abnormalities (contractures, ankyloses), and bone deformations.

It is recommended that patients with congenital contractures and scoliosis undergo radiography of the thoracic and lumbar spine in two projections for dynamic monitoring and to determine the timing for functional corrective bracing or surgical correction [30-32].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: this study allows for the detection of spinal developmental anomalies and scoliosis, as well as dynamic assessment of its progression.

It is recommended that patients with arthrogryposis undergo a comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, kidney ultrasound, and urinary bladder ultrasound to detect associated pathology. Frequency as indicated [37, 38].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended that patients with congenital contractures, when congenital central nervous system malformations are suspected, undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spinal cord (one region) for timely diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of complications [33, 40].

Level of certainty of recommendations C (evidence level of reliability 5)

stimulatory electromyography (stimulatory electroneuromyography of a single nerve), needle electromyography (single muscle), and surface electromyography (single anatomical region) to assess the state of muscles and peripheral nerves [30-32, 40-43].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: this study helps determine the level of nervous system lesion, assess the condition of the neuromuscular apparatus, and monitor treatment dynamics.

It is recommended that patients with suspected central nervous system lesions, as well as during follow-up monitoring to detect epileptiform activity, undergo electroencephalography. The frequency of the procedure is determined by clinical indications [35, 44].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: this study is non-invasive and allows for the detection of abnormal electrical activity in the brain.

It is recommended that patients with congenital contractures undergo muscle biopsy in cases of diagnostic difficulty to rule out congenital progressive neuromuscular disorders [33].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: this study is invasive. It enables the differential diagnosis of AMC from progressive neuromuscular disorders when no other means of diagnosing a neuromuscular disease are available.

2.5 Other Procedures

2.5.1 Prenatal Diagnosis

2.5.1.1 Ultrasound Examination

It is recommended that if signs of arthrogryposis are detected at 12 weeks of gestation, or in the presence of a burdened family history, an additional expert-level targeted fetal ultrasound be performed at 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, and 24 weeks [17, 24, 26, 45-47].

GCR BLOCE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

Comment: A non-invasive procedure with minimal health risk to the unborn child and mother. Assessment includes measuring the length and shape of the long tubular bones, ribs, and spine, checking for deformities, and evaluating whether bone length corresponds to gestational age. The main diagnostic signs at 12 weeks of pregnancy include: decreased size of the fetal nuchal translucency, restricted motor activity or akinesia, and limb and skeletal deformities. The lethal form of arthrogryposis at this gestational age is characterized by such signs as fetal akinesia, decreased fetal nuchal translucency, cystic hygroma, pulmonary hypoplasia, hydrops, and edema, which are poor prognostic signs. By 16–18 weeks of gestation, limb and whole-skeletal deformities are diagnosed, and slowed fetal movements are recorded. In the third trimester of pregnancy, polyhydramnios, clubfoot, joint contractures, pleuritis, micrognathia, ventriculomegaly, hydronephrosis, and gastric paresis are revealed [25–27, 45, 48–51]. Early ultrasound diagnosis of arthrogryposis is difficult. Prior to 24 weeks of gestation, this condition is diagnosed in only 25% of cases [28]. Most commonly, congenital multiple arthrogryposis is diagnosed in the late second to third trimester of pregnancy [26, 48]. The presence of neck edema, hydrops, scoliosis, and flexion contractures of the knee joints prior to 20 weeks is a prognostically unfavorable sign [52], which should be considered when making a decision on continuing the pregnancy [25].

It is recommended that all pregnant women undergoing fetal ultrasound examination be evaluated for the presence or absence of hyperextension in the fetal cervical spine in order to determine the indications for vaginal delivery or cesarean section [53].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: The presence of cervical spine hyperextension, especially when combined with fetal breech presentation, is an indication for cesarean section due to the high risk of cervical spine injury [28].

It is recommended that all pregnant women undergo an assessment of fetal motor activity during fetal ultrasound examination for the purpose of diagnosing fetal akinesia [17, 24, 26, 28, 48, 53–56].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: The most informative sign is the assessment of the pattern and quality of fetal movements. The duration of the study should be at least 45 minutes, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of fetal movements. Follow-up dynamic assessment is recommended. If congenital multiple arthrogryposis is detected in the fetus during pregnancy, measures aimed at enhancing its motor activity should be implemented, including maternal physical exercise, breathing exercises, and caffeine intake [25].

2.5.2.2 Fetal Cardiotocography

It is recommended that all pregnant women undergo assessment of fetal motor activity during cardiotocography (CTG) for the diagnosis of fetal akinesia [24, 26, 28, 48, 53].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: A characteristic sign is the absence of rapid fetal movements while slow movements—manifested as displacement of the head and trunk—are preserved. Slow fetal movements are usually not felt by the woman, which is why the characteristic complaint is the absence of fetal movements [24].

2.5.2.3 Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

It is recommended that all pregnant women undergo fetal magnetic resonance imaging when fetal malformations are suspected. It is performed after 17–18 weeks of gestation [28, 51].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: This study is not the primary method and is prescribed in addition to fetal ultrasound. It allows for the diagnosis of developmental anomalies of the central nervous system, lungs, and skeletal muscles, including their atrophy and fatty degeneration [24, 26–28, 45, 48, 53].

2.5.2.4 Molecular Genetic Testing

It is recommended in cases of a burdened family history and the presence of pathological signs on ultrasound for prenatal diagnosis of fetal developmental disorders (chorionic villus sampling, placental biopsy, amniocentesis, transvaginal amniocentesis, cordocentesis, ultrasound-guided cordocentesis), and comprehensive testing for prenatal diagnosis of child developmental disorders (in utero) [7, 24, 26, 28, 48, 53].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: The choice of procedure is determined by the gestational age, the condition of the pregnant woman, and the availability of technical resources. They are performed to obtain fetal cells and determine the genetic status of the fetus. In the first trimester of pregnancy, chorionic villus sampling is most commonly performed; in the second trimester, amniocentesis, placental biopsy, and cordocentesis are used [57].

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

3.1 Conservative Treatment

It is recommended that patients with arthrogryposis start conservative treatment early, which helps minimize surgical interventions and achieve optimal outcomes [31, 60–63].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: Provided the somatic condition of the child with arthrogryposis is stable, conservative treatment can be initiated as early as the first week of life in a hospital or home setting [31, 64]. The goal of treatment is to improve passive and active joint range of motion and eliminate limb deformities.

It is recommended that parents of a patient with arthrogryposis be actively involved in the child's treatment from the first days of life [60, 64, 65].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comments: Parents of a patient with arthrogryposis are trained in therapeutic physical education for joint injuries and diseases (corrective exercises and positioning aimed at eliminating deformities and contractures of the upper and lower limb joints); sessions should be conducted at least 4 times a day for 30 minutes.

It is recommended that patients with arthrogryposis receive the most intensive conservative treatment during the first months of life [30–31, 60, 61, 66–70]. Treatment programs should be sufficiently aggressive to allow the patient to realize their rehabilitation potential [28, 44].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comments: A rapid improvement in the range of motion in affected joints is a favorable prognostic factor for the recovery of the patient's motor activity. If there is no positive dynamic from conservative treatment within 1 month, the chances for further improvement are low. Improvement in the condition of the lower extremities during the first year of life helps determine the child's ability to sit, stand, and walk. Conservative treatment is most effective up to the age of 3–6 months.

It is recommended that general medical massage be administered to children starting from 2–3 weeks of age. It is extremely important during the first year of a child's life to develop their basic motor skills (e.g., rolling over, crawling, etc.). Physiotherapy procedures are initiated at 4–6 weeks of the child's life [30–31, 60, 61, 66–70].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended that patients with arthrogryposis receive an individualized treatment program involving a multidisciplinary team of specialists, including: pediatrician (pediatrician consultation/examination), general practitioner (general practitioner consultation/examination), geneticist (geneticist consultation/examination), pediatric trauma and orthopedic surgeon (trauma/orthopedic surgeon consultation/examination), neurologist (neurologist consultation/examination), medical psychologist (medical psychologist testing/consultation), and physical therapy physician (physiotherapist consultation/examination) [71].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended that patients with arthrogryposis perform positioning from the first days of life aimed at correcting joint contractures, combined with exercises aimed at restoring passive range of motion in the limb joints [31, 60].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comment: Custom-made pillows are used for this purpose.

It is recommended that patients with arthrogryposis undergo staged correction using splints as well as the application of circular plaster casts to correct contractures of the elbow, wrist joints, and hand fingers [60].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: In children under 3 months of age, splints are used for up to 20 hours a day, whereas in older children they are used only during daytime and nighttime sleep.

It is recommended that patients with arthrogryposis with hip joint pathology do not undergo closed reduction of hip dislocation, but rather receive treatment aimed at eliminating hip contractures [31, 60, 73].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: the presence of hip dislocation in a patient with arthrogryposis is an indication for surgery. Closed hip reduction methods in most cases fail to achieve reduction and frequently lead to avascular necrosis of the femoral head. When correcting flexion-adduction contractures of the hip joints, positioning the patient prone (to eliminate the flexion component) and in the supine position with lower limb abduction (to eliminate the adduction component) is indicated. In cases of external rotation-abduction contractures of the hips, the lower limbs are rotated and adducted to a neutral position and fixed in this position using elastic bandages.

It is recommended to start treatment of foot deformities from the distal parts of the extremities in patients with arthrogryposis [60-63]. Early initiation of conservative treatment minimizes surgical interventions and achieves optimal outcomes.

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: for casting feet, it is more rational to use long leg casts with the knee flexed at 90° to eliminate rotational movements in the knee joint and prevent the circular cast from slipping down.

It is recommended to apply circular casts according to the Ponseti method in patients with arthrogryposis presenting with clubfoot [6, 28, 74-75].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: to unlock the subtalar joint in children with arthrogryposis, an early achillotomy is performed after applying 1–3 circular casts once the cavus component of the deformity has been corrected. In some cases, when correcting equinus in the abducted position with pronounced tension of the achilles tendon, a repeat achillotomy is required. However, this frequently fails to achieve the necessary ankle dorsiflexion, as equinus is often caused not only by Achilles tendon shortening but also by retraction of the capsular and ligamentous structures along the posterior aspect of the ankle joint, necessitating surgical treatment.

It is recommended to perform circular casting according to the Dobbs method, changing the casts every 5–7 days, in patients with arthrogryposis and pes planovalgus to correct the pathological segment alignment and establish a weight-bearing foot [76-77].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: in severe pes planovalgus ("rocker-bottom foot"), serial cast correction aims to stretch the neurovascular bundles along the dorsolateral aspect of the foot, the retracted foot extensor tendons, and the peroneal muscle tendons, serving as a preparatory phase for surgery to prevent postoperative vascular complications and soft tissue necrosis. Initially, serial casting up to the upper third of the leg is performed in maximum possible plantar flexion, supination, and forefoot adduction. Subsequently, once the forefoot and midfoot are brought into a neutral position, the child is fitted with ankle-foot orthoses until surgical intervention takes place.

It is recommended to correct knee flexion contractures as a second stage, following foot deformity correction, in patients with arthrogryposis . In the presence of knee extension contractures, serial corrections are performed with a gradual increase in the knee flexion angle [60-63].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: for knee flexion contractures, serial application of circular casts and splints to the lower extremity is performed.

If contracture correction is incomplete and interferes with the child's subsequent ability to walk, surgical treatment is indicated.

It is recommended to prescribe assistive technology for rehabilitation to patients with arthrogryposis to ensure mobility (adapted mobility devices) and self-care (adapted home products/equipment; adapted household products), as well as prosthetic and orthotic devices (custom-made orthopedic shoes; foot orthosis; knee orthosis; knee-ankle-foot orthosis; ankle-foot orthosis; hip-knee-ankle-foot orthosis; knee-ankle orthosis; knee-ankle-foot orthosis; lower limb and trunk orthosis; shoulder orthosis; shoulder/elbow orthosis; shoulder/elbow/wrist orthosis; shoulder/elbow/wrist/hand orthosis; elbow orthosis; elbow/wrist/hand orthosis; wrist/hand orthosis; hand orthosis) [11, 28, 31, 60].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comments: the use of prosthetic and orthotic devices helps prevent deformity recurrence, while assistive rehabilitation devices ensure patient mobility and prevent the development of osteoporosis.

3.2 Surgical Treatment

3.2.1 Surgical Treatment of Upper Extremity Deformities

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment of upper extremity deformities based on individual indications in patients with arthrogryposis to restore self-care capabilities [78].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: during preoperative planning, it is necessary to assess the patient's rehabilitation potential and establish primary goals for surgical treatment. Treatment must be personalized [78]. The key joint determining the sequence and order of upper extremity surgeries is the elbow joint [30, 79].

It is recommended to perform posterior elbow arthrolysis, either isolated or combined with V-Y plasty of the triceps brachii tendon (correction of scar deformity; muscle and tendon repair; release of the tendon from scars and adhesions (tenolysis); arthroplasty of other joints), in patients with arthrogryposis presenting with elbow extension contractures [28, 78-79].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: the optimal age for this surgery is under 1 year [79].

It is recommended to restore active elbow flexion in patients with arthrogryposis when it is limited or absent, provided there are passive joint movements within the functional range (90–140°), triceps brachii strength of at least 3 points, and donor muscle strength of at least 4 points [40-42].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: the latissimus dorsi muscle, pectoralis major muscle, gracilis muscle, and long head of the triceps brachii muscle are most commonly used as donor muscles to restore active elbow flexion [32, 40-43, 78, 80-82].

It is recommended to rely on diagnostic methods such as soft tissue ultrasound, MRI of the muscular system, soft tissue computed tomography (CT), surface EMG, as well as clinical examination data (muscle strength assessment, level of spinal cord segmental lesion) when selecting a donor muscle in patients with arthrogryposis [32, 43].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: there are isolated studies on musculocutaneous nerve neurotization in infants in the first months of life with arthrogryposis to restore active forearm flexion; however, this technique has not gained widespread use [83-84].

It is recommended to focus on the possibility of passive contracture correction to a neutral position when choosing a treatment method for patients with arthrogryposis who have a flexion contracture with ulnar deviation of the wrist [30-31, 78].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: in cases where correction is feasible, tendon-muscle plasty is performed (division of the flexor carpi ulnaris, transposition of the flexor carpi radialis to the extensor carpi radialis brevis, and fasciotomy of the flexor aspect of the forearm). If passive correction of the wrist contracture to a neutral position is not possible, midcarpal joint resection combined with partial excision of the proximal and distal carpal rows is performed along with tendon-muscle plasty (division of the flexor carpi ulnaris, transposition of the flexor carpi radialis to the extensor carpi radialis brevis, and fasciotomy of the flexor aspect of the forearm).

It is recommended to perform skin plasty of the palmar aspect of the hand and thumb combined with tendon-muscle plasty (tendon repair; hand tendon repair; reconstructive plastic surgery with tissue complex transfer (skin, muscles, tendons)) in patients with arthrogryposis who have a flexion-adduction contracture of the thumb [30, 78, 80].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: in case of instability of the thumb metacarpophalangeal joint, chondrodesis is performed.

It is recommended to perform rotational osteotomy of the humerus in patients with arthrogryposis with internal rotation contracture of the shoulder joint [85-86].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: this procedure places the hand in a functionally advantageous position relative to the face without improving the range of motion in the shoulder joint. Common complications include periprosthetic fractures and recurrences of intraoral contractures [78, 78]. Currently, no surgical procedures have been developed to improve the range of active and passive motion in the shoulder joint [78, 80, 87, 88].

3.2.2 Surgical Treatment of Lower Extremity Deformities

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment of lower limb deformities based on individual indications in patients with arthrogryposis to restore mobility [28, 31, 73-75, 89].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: it is necessary to assess the patient's functional capabilities, the severity of lower extremity joint lesions, and the muscular system. The choice of the key joint depends on the age at which treatment is initiated.

It is recommended to perform a peritalar release in patients with arthrogryposis in case of clubfoot relapses following serial long-leg casting according to Ponseti [90-91].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: in children over 2 years of age with recurrent deformities and the impossibility of single-stage correction, contracture correction is performed by applying external fixation devices using a compression-distraction external fixation device on the lower leg and foot [31].

It is recommended to apply casts (serial casting) according to the Dobbs method (application of a circular plaster cast) in patients with arthrogryposis presenting with severe flat-valgus foot deformities with a vertical talus [76, 91, 92].

GCP CLE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: for rigid foot deformities and relapses after serial casting according to the Dobbs method, a peritalar release with open reduction of the talus is performed at the age of 6 months to 3 years [31, 93].

It is recommended to perform open hip reduction (reduction of joint dislocation) or combine it with corrective femoral osteotomy and pelvic osteotomy (Bone reconstruction. Pelvic osteotomy; Bone reconstruction. Bone osteotomy; Bone reconstruction. Corrective femoral osteotomy) in patients with arthrogryposis presenting with hip dislocation [31, 94, 95].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comment: the optimal age for open hip reduction is 5–12 months. Both anterolateral and medial approaches are used for open reduction [91, 93-96]. Joint stability can be enhanced using the ligamentum teres femoris [91]. However, the Watson-Jones anterolateral approach is preferred for patients with AMC, as achieving concentric reduction of the femoral head requires the elimination of external rotation contracture, which is achieved by tenotomy of the m. triceps coxa, and in more severe cases, a posterior capsulotomy is additionally performed [97].

It is recommended to perform corrective femoral osteotomy in children over 3 years of age (Bone reconstruction. Corrective femoral osteotomy) in patients with arthrogryposis presenting with severe hip contractures and multiplanar deformities [98].

GCP CLE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: in hip flexion contractures, percutaneous tenotomies of the subspinal muscles, tensor fasciae latae, and sartorius tendon significantly improve hip extension in children under 3 years of age [91].

It is recommended to perform temporary internal fixation of the distal femoral growth plates (temporary hemiepiphysiodesis) in children over 4-5 years of age for mild to moderate knee flexion contractures in patients with arthrogryposis [89, 99].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: temporary hemiepiphysiodesis is a minimally invasive and safe method compared to other techniques. However, when choosing this treatment method, it is necessary to assess the severity of functional impairments and rule out the need for immediate contracture correction, given the low rate of correction (~1.4° per month).

It is recommended to perform a posterior knee release and gradual contracture correction using a compression-distraction apparatus (application of external fixation devices using an external fixation compression-distraction apparatus) in patients with arthrogryposis and severe knee flexion contractures [31, 100].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: supracondylar extension femoral osteotomy for complete single-stage correction of a knee flexion contracture can only be performed in children with closed growth plates, as the effect is neutralized at a rate of 1° per month [89, 101].

It is recommended to perform anterior knee arthrolysis with quadriceps tendon lengthening (correction of scar deformity; muscle and tendon repair; release of the tendon from scars and adhesions (tenolysis); knee arthroplasty; lengthening, shortening, transposition of muscle and tendon) in patients with arthrogryposis under 2 years of age presenting with severe knee extension contractures [31, 91].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: knee extension contractures are more functionally advantageous for patient locomotion, but they limit sitting and transportation in older children. Minimally invasive subcutaneous partial myotomy of the rectus femoris can be performed in patients under 1 year of age. In older children, quadricepsplasty is performed in combination with shortening femoral osteotomy [91].

It is recommended to perform soft-tissue procedures combined with corrective tarsal osteotomies (bone reconstruction; corrective osteotomy for foot deformity) in patients with arthrogryposis aged 4–7 years [31].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: talectomy is currently not performed, as it leads to secondary deformities and ankylosis of the tibiocalcaneal joint in older children [91].

It is recommended to perform triple arthrodesis (Arthrodesis of foot and ankle joint; Arthrodesis of other joints) in patients with arthrogryposis aged 10-12 years presenting with severe equinovarus or planovalgus foot deformities, as well as in recurrent deformities [31, 90, 93].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: arthrodesis procedures on the feet in children are performed at the end of growth at 14-15 years of age. However, children with arthrogryposis exhibit spontaneous ankylosis at the level of the Chopart, subtalar, and ankle joints in a malpositioned attitude already at 9-10 years of age in recurrent deformities, which is why triple arthrodesis may be performed in them as early as 10-12 years of age [31].

3.3 Other Treatment

It is recommended to use exoskeletons in patients with arthrogryposis presenting with severe upper limb deformities and no prospects for surgical treatment to improve self-care capabilities [78, 88, 102-103].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comments: the use of exoskeletons allows some patients to partially improve upper limb function; however, they are largely inaccessible to the majority of patients due to their high cost and lack of mass industrial production [78, 80, 102, 103]. Developing treatment methods utilizing cell technologies have not yet found clinical application [104].

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

It is recommended for patients with arthrogryposis older than 1 year throughout the child's growth period to regularly undergo general medical massage, massage for musculoskeletal disorders in early childhood, physical therapy for joint diseases and injuries, postural correction, games in rehabilitation programs, sports elements in rehabilitation programs, exercise therapy using exercise equipment, hydrokinesitherapy in the pool combined with physiotherapeutic treatment (medicinal electrophoresis for joint diseases, medicinal electrophoresis for central nervous system and brain diseases, paraffin-ozokerite application, muscle electrical stimulation, spinal cord electrical neurostimulation (Appendix A3.2)). It is necessary to teach parents a home exercise program and orthopedic regimen to maximize the range of passive and active joint movements and reduce the severity of contractures. It is necessary to train the patient's family members in transfer and/or positioning techniques in bed. To restore passive and active joint movements, it is necessary to use mechanotherapy, robotic mechanotherapy, biofeedback-assisted exercise therapy for joint diseases and injuries, correction of motor function disorders using biofeedback, and correction of motor function disorders using computer technologies. It is necessary to use developmental stimulation, positioning, exercises aimed at strengthening the trunk and extremities to optimize the development of motor skills and adapt the child's capabilities using assistive devices, splints, and orthoses [105-111].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: the home exercise program should be performed by the family or caregivers daily, under the regular supervision of specialists (1-2 times a month). Measures aimed at improving joint mobility and stimulating the development of fine and gross motor skills and hand functions should complement each other and be performed in parallel. In the presence of torticollis, special stretching exercises should be performed. Parent training is key to supporting parent-child interaction and ensuring safe and regular performance of exercises at home and in various settings (e.g., kindergarten). Demonstration of exercise technique and practice with physical therapy specialists are important to ensure proper understanding of the recommended stretching exercises and the home exercise program. Children with AMC may not always achieve all expected developmental milestones, and these may be achieved at different ages. The use of biofeedback and computer technologies in the rehabilitation of children with arthrogryposis is advisable from the age of 3-4 years.

It is recommended for patients with amyoplasia aged 1 year and older to undergo spinal cord electrical neurostimulation to improve their motor activity [60, 72].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: this technique is performed percutaneously in children, is non-invasive, and helps improve the child's motor activity as a result of stimulating motor neurons in the anterior horns of the spinal cord.

It is recommended for patients with arthrogryposis to use orthoses for the upper and/or lower extremities, starting from the first year of life and throughout life, to improve joint position, increase and maintain the range of motion, and provide stability during standing, walking, and performing other functional tasks [105, 112].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: in the presence of joint contracture, the use of orthoses in children should be considered from the first weeks/months of life. The wear schedule (e.g., day/night) and type of orthotic devices should be determined according to the orthosis prescription and treatment goal. Orthoses used to improve or maintain range of motion should be started in the first year of life, continued throughout the growth period, and used predominantly at night. Orthoses used for functional support should be used during the day. When choosing orthotic devices, cost, insurance coverage, access to orthotic services, and resource availability should be considered, which may vary depending on geographic location [31, 112].

It is recommended for patients with arthrogryposis to undergo early training in mobility options, both independently and using assistive devices, depending on the child's age and functional capabilities (training the patient in self-care during transfers in bed and/or wheelchair, training the patient in self-care during transfers using additional support) [106, 111, 113].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: mobility, starting from the first year of life, should be encouraged by improving coordination, muscle strength, development of motor skills and balance, and developed in accordance with the child's individual capabilities, functional needs, and environmental requirements (e.g., at home, school, community). Standing should begin at approximately 1 year of age (this may vary depending on the child's capabilities), using mobility aids if necessary (e.g., standers, gait trainers, walkers, push toys), and should be encouraged daily. Wheeled mobility devices, such as adapted toy cars, can be used earlier to encourage the child to explore the environment while practicing independent mobility where possible. It is important to continue working on maximizing the ability to stand and/or walk, even if a wheelchair is used, taking into account the family's individual preferences and capabilities. When independent manual wheelchair propulsion is difficult due to limited upper extremity function, powered mobility should be considered.

It is recommended for patients with arthrogryposis to use occupational therapy and training in self-care to develop maximum independence in self-care (feeding, dressing, personal care, grooming, bathing) and other activities in various settings (at home, school, work, in the community) [105, 106, 113-119].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: introduction to self-care tasks begins at an early age with independent feeding. In school age, the need for independence increases in tasks such as dressing, grooming, and school-related activities (e.g., writing, cutting, etc.). For adolescents, toileting and personal hygiene become very important as they affect community participation and self-esteem. The choice of activity depends on the child's age and/or developmental stage, needs, and interests. Functional goals should be determined by the rehabilitation team with the participation of the child and parents to ensure that goals are realistic and aligned with the child's priorities. If necessary, children with arthrogryposis should be taught compensatory strategies, such as using external surfaces or other body parts for passive movement of the upper extremity, which they can use, for example, for independent feeding, self-care, etc.

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

For patients with arthrogryposis, it is advisable to use a comprehensive approach during treatment, including: conservative and surgical treatment of contractures and musculoskeletal deformities (to correct functionally unfavorable limb positions for self-care), rehabilitation, including social and vocational rehabilitation (to develop movements in the joints of the upper and lower extremities, teach self-care skills, and integrate them into daily life), as well as individual selection of orthoses (both to correct joint mobility and to prevent recurrent deformities) [115, 120-121].

It is recommended for patients with arthrogryposis to undergo follow-up by an orthopedic trauma surgeon (dispensary appointment (examination, consultation) by an orthopedic trauma surgeon) with a frequency of 1 every 6–12 months [30, 32, 95].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

5.1 Pregnancy and Childbirth in Patients with AMC

It is recommended to refer a patient with arthrogryposis and their family for a geneticist consultation (appointment, examination, consultation) when planning a pregnancy [17-22, 120].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended for pregnant patients with suspected fetal AMC to undergo regular and more frequent fetal ultrasound examinations for early diagnosis of pathology, as well as measures aimed at stimulating fetal motor activity (described in the section "Prenatal Diagnostics") [17-22].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended that pregnant patients diagnosed prenatally with arthrogryposis undergo delivery via caesarean section to prevent intrapartum fetal and maternal trauma [28, 53].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

6. Organization of Medical Care

At any stage of medical care delivery to patients with AMC, a number of principles must be observed.

1) The patient and their representatives must receive complete information about the disease, including etiology, pathogenesis, course, prognosis, modern treatment methods, and potential complications.

2) A diagnosis of AMC implies the provision of primary, specialized, and palliative care.

3) Upon diagnosis of AMC, the family should be referred to a specialist with experience working with AMC patients, possessing up-to-date information about the disease, practical experience in its treatment, and the opportunity to participate in clinical trials (of new drugs and/or medical devices). It is also important to inform families about existing public organizations working with AMC patients and their families.

4) A multidisciplinary team of specialists should be involved in monitoring an AMC patient, consisting of: a pediatrician, general practitioner (therapist), geneticist, trauma surgeon (orthopedist), neurologist, medical psychologist, physical therapy physician, physiotherapist, social educator, and prosthetic-orthotic technician. Primary follow-up of AMC patients is carried out by the trauma surgeon (orthopedist). The duties of the trauma surgeon (orthopedist) include: examination and diagnosis, informing the family about the disease, drawing up a treatment plan, conservative treatment of the patient, dynamic follow-up and timely referral for surgical treatment, prescription of orthoses and prosthetic-orthotic devices (POD) and assistive technology (AT), as well as monitoring the replacement of POD and AT as the child grows. Other specialists should be involved as needed if the patient has concomitant pathology [6, 44].

5) In accordance with Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1122n dated December 6, 2021, "On Approval of the National Schedule of Preventive Vaccinations and the Schedule of Preventive Vaccinations by Epidemiological Indications and the Procedure for Conducting Preventive Vaccinations", vaccination in AMC patients in the absence of severe concomitant pathology is carried out according to the National Vaccination Schedule [122].

6.1 Indications for Planned Hospitalization

• Complex rehabilitation treatment (exercise therapy, mechanotherapy, robotic mechanotherapy, therapeutic exercise with biofeedback for joint diseases and injuries, general medical massage, drug electrophoresis for joint diseases, drug electrophoresis for central nervous system and brain diseases, paraffin-ozokerite applications, muscle electrical stimulation). Staged correction of joint contractures and limb deformities by applying circular plaster casts.

• Staged surgical treatment.

6.2 Indications for Discharge from the Inpatient Facility

• Improvement of motor activity and/or patient self-care after a course of complex rehabilitation treatment. Completion of the correction of contractures and limb deformities by applying circular plaster casts.

• Implementation of staged surgical treatment, stable patient condition, absence of postoperative complications.

Table 3. Organizational and technical conditions for the provision of medical care.

Type of medical care

Specialized, including high-tech, medical care

Age group

Children, adults

Conditions of medical care

Inpatient, day patient setting

Form of medical care

Elective

7. Additional Information

In accordance with the Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 747 dated December 19, 2025, "On the Approval of the Rules for the Provision of Medical Care in the Profile 'Obstetrics and Gynecology'", parents of children with AMC, when planning subsequent pregnancies, as well as when planning a pregnancy in a family where one of the parents has arthrogryposis, should be referred for a geneticist consultation to minimize the risk of having an affected child.

Women are referred to a medical genetic counseling clinic for an appointment (examination, consultation) with a geneticist to determine the risk of having an affected child. The geneticist determines the risk of this pathology developing in the fetus, and the couple is given recommendations on pregnancy planning. If there is data on a verified mutation in genes responsible for the development of arthrogryposis in close relatives of the proband and/or the proband themselves who have congenital multiple contractures, it is recommended to search for the same mutation variant in the fetal DNA [57].

If fetal pathology is detected in the first and second trimesters of pregnancy, or in the presence of a burdened hereditary history, diagnostic tests such as chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, placental biopsy, or cordocentesis are performed to detect severe congenital diseases [57].

If congenital malformations (malformations of development), chromosomal or other hereditary diseases are detected in the fetus, pregnancy management tactics are determined based on a medical board (consilium) conclusion [57]. The board must include a geneticist, an ultrasound diagnostician, an obstetrician-gynecologist, and a trauma surgeon (orthopedist). During the board meeting, the pregnant woman and her family members are informed about the nature of the fetal lesion, possible pregnancy outcomes, and the prognosis for the child's life and health. If indications are present, recommendations on pregnancy termination are given. It is necessary to explain to the parents the full severity of the disease and the prospects for the child's treatment, and if they decide to continue the pregnancy, to psychologically prepare them for treatment immediately after the child's birth, which helps improve treatment outcomes [28, 123].

7.1 Outcomes and prognosis

The prognosis for an AMC patient depends on the form of the disease, the nature of the deformities, their severity, and the presence of concomitant pathology, and can range from life-threatening to minimal orthopedic impairments. 10% of children are born dead, 27% die within the first months of life [28]. 7% of patients have very severe forms of the disease [18]. 30–40% of patients have feeding difficulties, 4% have respiratory disorders, which usually resolve over time. When the patient reaches the age of 3–4 months, the outcomes of further treatment can usually be predicted. The prognosis is determined by the presence of concomitant pathology, including central nervous system involvement, the child's intellectual development, and the timing and results of conservative and surgical treatment. Most AMC patients have significant potential for walking and independence in everyday life in adulthood. Prerequisites for independent walking are: absence of severe scoliosis, hip flexion contracture less than 20°, knee flexion contracture less than 15°, and active movements in the hip and knee joints [22, 124]. When predicting the possibility of self-care, one should focus on the level of the segmental spinal cord lesion. Patients with a C5–C6 lesion level are completely independent in everyday life, those with C5–C7 partially need assistance and often use compensatory-adaptive mechanisms to perform basic daily skills, while with a C5–Th1 lesion, patients' self-care is minimal and they largely or completely require outside help [125].

All children with AMC experience delayed motor development due to limb involvement; however, by the age of 5 years, 85% of patients are able to walk. The majority of children with AMC experience mild to moderate difficulties with mobility, self-care (e.g., showering), and performance of daily activities. Prognostically unfavorable indicators that worsen the quality of life in patients with this pathology include: low birth weight, prolonged hospital stay in early childhood, multiple orthopedic surgeries, and the use of a wheelchair [126]. The ability to walk independently or with assistive devices in adult patients with AMC ranges from 49% to 88%. However, a number of patients eventually lose the ability to walk, which in some cases is associated with weight gain in adulthood [114, 115, 120, 124, 125, 127–129]. Between 48% and 86% drive cars independently [115, 127]. Between 15% and 50% of adult patients with good upper extremity function are completely independent in daily life [114, 115, 124]. Surgical interventions in childhood are performed in the majority of patients (95–98%), averaging 7–10 surgeries, though in some patients the lifetime number reaches 45–70 surgeries [121, 127]. The primary issue impairing the quality of life in adult patients with AMC is pain (75–91%), predominantly localized to the feet, knees, spine, and upper extremities, which frequently limits their physical activity [114, 120, 127–128, 130–131]. Patients are most troubled by pain in the lumbosacral spine as well as the lower extremities, which is often chronic in nature, thereby hindering their ability to achieve verticalization and walking [131–132]. Assessment of the patients' social status is also noteworthy: 83% are employed in adulthood (of whom 48% have a higher education degree), 58% start their own families, and 52% have children [124].

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

Criteria for assessing the quality of primary health care

Criteria for assessing the quality of medical care — Congenital multiple arthrogryposis
Criteria for assessing the quality of medical care — Congenital multiple arthrogryposis
Criteria for assessing the quality of specialized medical care, including high-tech medical care

Criteria for assessing the quality of medical care — Congenital multiple arthrogryposis
Criteria for assessing the quality of medical care — Congenital multiple arthrogryposis

References

Show references
  1. Cachecho S., Elfassy C., Hamdy R., Rosenbaum P., Dahan-Oliel N. The definition of congenital multiple arthrogryposis: an update using an approach based on international consensus. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019; 181 (3): 280-287. DOI: 10.1002 / ajmg.c.31739.

  2. Kimber E. AMC: amyoplasia and distal arthrogryposis. J Child Orthop. 2015 Dec;9(6):427-32. doi: 10.1007/s11832-015-0689-1.

  3. Swinyard C.A. Concepts of multiple congenital contractures (arthrogryposis) in man and animals. Teratology. 1982; 25 (2): 247-59.doi: 10.1002/tera.1420250214

  4. Hall JG. Arthrogryposis (multiple congenital contractures): diagnostic approach to etiology, classification, genetics, and general principles. Eur J Med Genet. 2014 Aug;57(8):464-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.03.008

  5. Hall JG, Kimber E, Dieterich K. Classification of arthrogryposis. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019 Sep; 181(3):300-303. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31716.

  6. Kowalczyk B., Felus J. Arthrogryposis: an update on clinical aspects, etiology, and treatment strategies. Arch Med Sci. 2016 Feb 1; 12(1):10-24. doi: 10.5114/aoms. 2016. 57578

  7. Griffet J., Dieterich K., Bourg V., Bourgeois E. Amyoplasia and distal arthrogryposis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res.2020 Dec; 102781. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.102781.

  8. Lowry RB, Sibbald B, Bedard T, Hall JG. Prevalence of multiple congenital contractures including arthrogryposis multiplex congenita in Alberta, Canada, and a strategy for classification and coding. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010 Dec;88(12):1057-1061. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20738

  9. Bamshad M., JordeL. B., Carey J.C. A revised and extended classification of the distal arthrogryposes. Am J Med Genet.1996 Nov;65(4):277-81. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096- 8628(19961111)65:4

  10. Hall J.G. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: etiology, genetics, classification, diagnostic approach, general aspects. J. Pediatr. Orthop. Part B. 1997; 6 (3): 159-166.

  11. Staheli, L. T., Hall, J. G., Jaffe, K. M., &Paholke, D. O. Arthrogryposis: A text atlas. Cambridge University Press: UK. 2008:178. doi: 10.1017/s0012162299 210444.

  12. Bamshad M, Van Heest AE, Pleasure D. Arthrogryposis: a review and update. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jul;91(Suppl 4):40-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00281.

  13. Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. – Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, 1966–2026.

  14. Zhou H., LianC., Wang T. et al. MET mutation causes muscular dysplasia and arthrogryposis. EMBO Mol Med.2019 Mar; 11(3):e9709. doi: 10.15252/emmm. 201809709.

  15. Boschann F, Cogulu O, Pehlivan D, Balachandran S, at all. Biallelic variants in ADAMTS15 cause a novel form of distal arthrogryposis. Genet Med. 2023 May;25(5):100799. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100799.

  16. Kimber E., Tajsharghi H., Kroksmark  A.et all. Distal arthrogryposis: clinical and genetic findingsActaPaediatr. 2012 Aug;101(8):877-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02708.x.

  17. Hall J.G., Aldinger K.A., Tanaka K.I. Amyoplasia revisited. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A (3):700-30. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36395.

  18. Hall J.G., Kimber E., Harold J P van Bosse. Genetics and Classifications. J PediatrOrthop. 2017;37 Suppl 1: S4-S8. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000997

  19. North KN, Wang CH, Clarke N et all. Approach to the diagnosis of congenital myopathies. Neuromuscul Disord. 2014 Feb;24(2):97-116. doi: 10.1016/j.nmd.2013. 11.003.

  20. Falsaperla R, Pratico AD, Ruggieri M. et all. Congenital muscular dystrophy: from muscle to brain. Ital J Pediatr. 2016 Aug 31;42(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13052-016-0289-9.

  21. Seliverstov Yu.A., Klyushnikov S.A., Illarioshkin S.N. Spinal muscular atrophy: concept, differential diagnosis, prospects for treatment. // Nervnye bolezni. - 2015. - No. 3. - P. 9-17.

  22. Hall JG, Kiefer J. Arthrogryposis as a Syndrome: Gene Ontology Analysis. MolSyndromol. 2016 Jul;7(3):101-9. doi: 10.1159/000446617

  23. Buklaev D.S., Kostik M.M., Agranovich O.E., Trofimova S.I. Brooke syndrome. Case report. / D.S. Buklaev // Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. - 2015. - Vol. 3. - No. 3. - P. 44-47. DOI: 10.17816/PTORS3344-47.

  24. de Vries J.I., Fong B. F. Changes in fetal mobility as a result of congenital disorders: an overview. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 May;29(5):590-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.3917.

  25. Filges I, Hall JG. Failure to identify antenatal multiple congenital contractures and fetal akinesia-proposal of guidelines to improve diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2013 Jan;33(1):61-74. doi: 10.1002/pd.4011.

  26. Filges I, Tercanli S, Hall JG. Fetal arthrogryposis: challenges and perspectives for prenatal detection and management. Am J Med Genet Part C Semin Med Genet. 2019 181:327-336. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31723

  27. Niles KM, Blaser S, Shannon P, Chitayat D. Fetal arthrogryposis multiplex congenita/fetal akinesia deformation sequence (FADS)-Aetiology, diagnosis, and management. PrenatDiagn 2019; 39:720-731.doi: 10.1002/pd.5505

  28. van Bosse HJP. Orthopaedic care of the child with arthrogryposis: a 2020 overview. CurrOpinPediatr. 2020 Feb;32(1):76-85. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000847. PMID: 31743218.

  29. Fassier A, Wicart P, Dubousset J, Seringe R. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Long-term follow-up from birth until skeletal maturity. J Child Orthop. 2009 Oct;3(5):383-90. doi: 10.1007/s11832-009-0187-4.

  30. Kochenova E.A. Wrist deformities and their treatment in children with congenital multiple arthrogryposis: Cand. Sci. (Med.) dissertation: 04.01.15: defended on 07.02.2017: approved / Kochenova Evgenia Alexandrovna. - Saint Petersburg, 2017. - 204 p.

  31. Petrova E.V. Orthopedic and surgical treatment of young children with arthrogryposis: Cand. Sci. (Med.) dissertation: 14.00.22: defended on 19.02.2008: approved / Petrova Ekaterina Vladimirovna. - Saint Petersburg, 2008. - 355 p.

  32. Trofimova S.I. Restoration of active forearm flexion in children with arthrogryposis based on transposition of the long head of the triceps brachii muscle (an anatomical and clinical study): Cand. Sci. (Med.) dissertation: 04.01.15, 04.03.01: defended on 24.12.2013: approved / Trofimova Svetlana Ivanovna. - Saint Petersburg, 2013. - 200 p.

  33. Dieterich, K., Le Tanno, P., Kimber, E., Jouk, P., Hall, J., &Giampietro, P. The diagnostic workup in a patient with AMC: Overview of the clinical evaluation and paraclinical analyses with review of the literature. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics.2019 Sep; 181(3):337-344. doi:10.1002/ajmg.c.31730 

  34. Hacohen Y, Jacobson LW, Byrne S, Norwood F, Lall A, Robb S, Dilena R, Fumagalli M, Born AP, Clarke D, Lim M, Vincent A, Jungbluth H. Fetal acetylcholine receptor inactivation syndrome: A myopathy due to maternal antibodies. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuro in flamm. 2014 Dec 23;2(1): e57. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000057.

  35. Dieterich K, Kimber E, Hall JG. Central nervous system involvement in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: Overview of causes, diagnosis, and care. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019 Sep;181(3):345-353. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31732

  36. Todd E.J., Yau K.S., Ong R.et all. Next generation sequencing in a large cohort of patients presenting with neuromuscular disease before or at birth.2015 Nov 17;10:148. doi: 10.1186/s13023-015-0364-0.

  37. Tyagusheva E.N., Naumenko E.I. // Analysis of ultrasound screening of the kidneys and abdominal organs in infants in the first month of life. // Russian Pediatric Journal. - 2021. - Vol. 24. - No. S. - P. 59-60.

  38. A.Yu. Vasiliev, E.B. Olkhova. Basics of ultrasound diagnostics in pediatrics and pediatric surgery. // Study guide for ultrasound diagnostics physicians. - 2019. - 340 p. UDC 616-053.2-073.432.19.

  39. Asadulaeva M.M., Alieva O.D., Aliev M.M., Denisova E.A., Penkov V.A. Timely MRI diagnostics of congenital malformations of the brain and spinal cord. In the collection: Development of the radiotherapeutic service in Russia. High technologies of conservative treatment. Proceedings of the VII All-Russian Medical Forum in the Volga Federal District jointly with the VII Russian Scientific and Practical Oncological Conference. Executive Editor: V.V. Rodionov. 2012. P. 26-29.

  40. Agranovich O.E., Kochenova E.A., Trofimova S.I., Petrova E.V., Buklaev D.S. Use of the latissimus dorsi muscle to restore active elbow flexion in patients with arthrogryposis // Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. - 2018. - Vol. 6. - No. 3. - P. 5-11. doi: 10.17816/PTORS6273-75

  41. Agranovich O.E., Baindurashvili A.G., Petrova E.V., Trofimova S.I., Kochenova E.A. Use of the latissimus dorsi muscle to restore active forearm flexion in children with arthrogryposis // Annual Scientific and Practical Conference on Topical Issues of Pediatric Traumatology and Orthopedics "Turner Readings". Collection of articles. - Saint Petersburg. - 2019. - P. 17-25.

  42. Agranovich O.E., Savina M.V., Petrova E.V., Komolkin I.A. Feasibility of simultaneous transposition of pectoralis major muscle segments to restore shoulder and elbow flexion (clinical case) // Medical Alliance. - 2020. - Vol. 8. - No. 1. - P. 61-68. doi: 10.36422/23076348-2020-8-1-61-68

  43. Agranovich O.E., Kochenova E.A., Oreshkov A.B., Trofimova S.I., Petrova E.V., Gabbasova E.L., Blagoveshchensky E.D. Evaluation of the results of monopolar transposition of the latissimus dorsi muscle into the forearm flexor position in patients with arthrogryposis // Genius of Orthopedics. - 2019. - Vol. 25. - No. 1. - P. 42-48. doi: 10.18019/1028-4427-2019-25-1-42-48.

  44. Dahan-Oliel N., Cachecho S., Barnes D. International multidisciplinary collaboration toward an annotated definition of arthrogryposis multiplex congenital. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019 Sep;181(3):288-299. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31721.

  45. Tjon JK, Tan-Sindhunata GM, Bugiani M, et al. Fetal akinesia deformation sequence, arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, and bilateral clubfeet: is motor assessment of additional value for in utero diagnosis? A 10-year cohort study. Prenat Diagn 2019; 39:219-231. doi: 10.1002/pd.5411

  46. Tjon JK, Tan-Sindhunata MB, Bugiani M, Witbreuk M et all. Care Pathway for Fetal Joint Contractures, Fetal Akinesia Deformation Sequence, and Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2021;48(11-12):829-839. doi: 10.1159/000520869.

  47. Lazarevich A.A., Pribushenya O.V. Prenatal diagnosis of amyoplasia / Prenatal Diagnosis. 2021. Vol. 20. No. 1. P. 76-79.

  48. Stygar A.M., Khramchenko N.V. Early ultrasound diagnosis of fetal arthrogryposis // Ultrasound and Functional Diagnostics. - 2009. - Vol. 6. - P. 101-106.

  49. Mashinets N.V., Demidov V.N. Arthrogryposis and assessment of fetal motor activity // Prenatal Diagnosis. - 2018. - Vol. 17. - No. 3. - P. 243-247. doi: 10.21516/2413-14582018-17-3-243-247

  50. Hellmund A, Berg C, Geipel A, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal akinesia deformation sequence (FADS): a study of 79 consecutive cases. Arch GynecolObstet 2016; 294:697-707. doi: 10.1007/s00404-016-4017-x

  51. Skaria P, Dahl A, Ahmed A. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita in utero: radiologic and pathologic findings. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Feb;32(3):502-511. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1381683.

  52. Busack B, Ott CE, Henrich W, Verlohren S. Prognostic significance of prenatal ultrasound in fetal arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Oct 22. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05828-4.

  53. Hall JG. Fetal cervical hyperextension in arthrogryposis. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2019; 181:354-362. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31727

  54. Dimitraki M., Tsikouras P., Bouchlariotou S. Prenatal assessment of arthrogryposis. A review of the literature. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2011; 24 (1): 32-36. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.482615.

  55. Hyett J., Noble P., Sebire N.J. Lethal congenital arthrogryposis presents with increased nuchal translucency at 10-14 weeks of gestation. Prenat. Diagn. 1997; 9(5): 310-313. doi: 10.1046/j .1469-0705.1997.09050310.x.

  56. Scott H., Hunter A., Bedard B. Non-lethal arthrogryposis multiplex congenital presenting with cystic hygroma at 13 weeks gestational age. Prenat. Diagn. 1999;19(10): 966-971. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0223(199910).

  57. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 747 dated December 19, 2025, "On the procedure for providing medical care in the field of 'obstetrics and gynecology'", registered with the Russian Ministry of Justice on December 30, 2025.

  58. Kang P.B., Lidov G.W., David W.S. et al. Diagnostic value of electromyography and muscle biopsy in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Ann Neurol.2003; 54(6):790-795. doi:10.1002/ana.10769

  59. Ma L., Yu X. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: classification, diagnosis, perioperative care, and anesthesia. Front Med. 2017;11(1):48-52. doi: 10.1007/s11684-017-0500-4.

  60. Agranovich O.E., Baindurashvili A.G., Petrova E.V., et al. Conservative treatment of upper and lower extremity deformities in young children with arthrogryposis // Detskaya khirurgiya. - 2012. - No. 2. - P. 10-15. UDC 616.71/.72-007.24-06:616.75-007.681-08.

  61. Wagner L.V., Cherry J.S., Sawatzky B.J. et all. Rehabilitation across the lifespan for individuals with arthrogryposis. Am J Med Genet. 2019;181C:385-392. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31729

  62. Ayadi K., Trigui M., Abid A. et all. Clinical manifistations and management. Archives de Pediatrie. 2015; 22: 830-839. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2015.05.014

  63. Sells J.M. Amyoplasia, the most common type of arthrogryposis: the potential for good outcome. Pediatrics.1996; 97:225-231.

  64. Palmer P.M., Macewen C.D., Bowen J.R., Mathews P.A. Passive motion therapy for infants with arthrogryposis. Clinical orthopaedics and related recearch.1985; 194 (4):54-59.

  65. Hahn G. Arthrogryposis: pediatric review and habilitative aspects. Clinical orthopaedics and related research.1985; 194(4): 104-114.

  66. Pous J.G., Lebard J.P., J. Lefart J. et al. Symposium de la societefrancaise de chirurgie infantile: l'arthrogrypose pendant l'enfance. Chir.Pediatr. 1981;22 (5):289-364.

  67. Sodergard J., Hakamies-Blomqvist L., Kimmo Sainio D. et al. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: perinatal and electromyographic findings, disability and psychosocial outcome. J.Pediatr. Orthop. Part B.1997; 6:167-171.

  68. Paleg G.S., Smith B.A., Glickman L.B. Systematic review and evidence-based clinical recommendations for dosing of pediatric supported standing programs. Pediatric Physical Therapy.2013;25(3): 232-247. doi:10.1097/PEP.0b013e318299d5e7

  69. Binkiewicz-Glinska A., Sobierajska-Rek A., Bakula S. et al. Arthrogryposis in infancy, multidisciplinary approach: Case report. BMC Pediatrics.2013; 13: 184. doi:10.1186/1471- 2431-13-184

  70. Babik I., Cunha A.B., Moeyaert M. et al. Feasibility and effectiveness of intervention with the play skinl Lift exoskeletal garment for infants at risk. Phys Ther. 2019; 99(6): 666-676. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz035

  71. Kowalczyk B, Feluś J. Arthrogryposis: an update on clinical aspects, etiology, and treatment strategies. Arch Med Sci. 2016 Feb 1;12(1):10-24. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.57578.

  72. Blagoveshchensky E., Agranovich O., Kononova E., Gabbasova E., Rozhdestvensky V. Evaluation of the effects of transvertebral direct current stimulation in children with arthrogryposis // New approaches to studying classical problems. Proceedings of the IX All-Russian Conference with International Participation and Elements of a Scientific School on Muscle Physiology and Muscle Activity Dedicated to the Memory of E.E. Nikolsky. Under the general editorship of I.B. Kozlovskaya, O.L. Vinogradova, B.S. Shenkman: collection of articles. - Moscow. - P. 42. UDC: 612.7 + 591.17

  73. Yau P., Chow W., Li Y. et al. Twenty-year follow-up of hip problems in arthrogryposis multiplex congenital. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2002; 22 (3): 359-363.

  74. Derevyanko D.V., Agranovich O.E., Buklaev D.S., Petrova E.V., Trofimova S.I. Treatment of clubfoot in young children with arthrogryposis using the Ponseti method: capabilities and prospects // Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. - 2014. - No. 1. - P. 51-58. doi: 10.21823/2311-2905-2014-0-1-51-58

  75. Trofimova S.I., Derevyanko D.V., Kochenova E.A., Petrova E.V. Efficacy of achillotomy in children with arthrogryposis // Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. - 2019. - Vol. 7. - No. 2. - P. 51-60. doi: 10.17816/PTORS7251-60

  76. Blandinsky V.F., Vavilov M.A., Gromov I.V. The Dobbs method in the treatment of children with severe congenital flat-valgus foot deformities // Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. - 2012. - No. 3. - P. 89-94. https://doi.org/ 10.21823/2311-2905-2012-3-89-94.

  77. Chan Y, Selvaratnam V, Garg N. A comparison of the Dobbs method for correction of idiopathic and teratological congenital vertical talus. J Child Orthop. 2016 Apr;10(2):93-9. doi: 10.1007/s11832-016-0727-7.

  78. Oishi SN, Agranovich O, Pajardi GE, Novelli C, Baindurashvili AG, Trofimova SI, Abdel-Ghani H, Kochenova E, Prosperpio G, Jester A, Yilmaz G, §enaran H, Kose O, Butler L. Treatment of the Upper Extremity Contracture/Deformities. J PediatrOrthop. 2017 Jul/Aug;37 Suppl 1: S9-15.doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001002.

  79. Petrova E.V., Agranovich O.E., Trofimova S.I., Kochenova E.A. Posterior elbow arthrolysis as a method for correcting extension contracture in children with arthrogryposis. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2019; 7(3): 25-34. doi: 10.17816/PTORS7325-34

  80. Oishi S, Agranovich O, Zlotolow D, Wall L, Stutz C, Pajardi G, Novelli C, Abdel Ghani H, Jester A, Vuillermin C, James M, Manske MC, Beckwith T. Treatment and outcomes of arthrogryposis in the upper extremity. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019 Sep;181(3):363- 371. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31722.

  81. Agranovich O.E., Baindurashvili A.G., Mikiashvili E.F. Method for restoring active movements in the elbow joint in patients with congenital multiple arthrogryposis. Patent for invention RU2690605 C1, 04.06.2019. Application No. 2018113224 dated 11.04.2018.

  82. Trofimova S.I., Agranovich O.E. Transposition of the long head of the triceps brachii muscle: topographical and anatomical rationale for surgical technique and results of clinical approbation // Congenital and acquired pathology of the upper extremities in children (diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation). Scientific and practical conference with international participation: collection of abstracts. Turner Scientific Research Institute for Children's Orthopedics. - Saint Petersburg, 2016. - P. 54.

  83. Bahm J. Arguments for a neuroorthopaedic strategy in upper limb arthrogryposis. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2013 Oct 17;8(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1749-7221-8-9

  84. Hagemann C, Stacker R, Breyer S, Kunkel POS. Nerve transfer from the median to musculocutaneous nerve to induce active elbow flexion in selected cases of arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Microsurgery. 2019 Nov;39(8):710-714. doi: 10.1002/micr.30451.

  85. Ramirez R.N., Richards C.J., Kozin S.H., Zlotolow D.A. Combined Elbow Release and Humeral Rotational Osteotomy in Arthrogryposis. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(11): 926.e1-926.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.005

  86. Wall L.B., Calhoun V., Roberts S., Goldfarb C.A. Distal Humerus External Rotation Osteotomy for Hand Position in Arthrogryposis. J Hand Surg Am. 2017;42(6): 473.e1-473.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.002

  87. Ezaki M. Treatment of the upper limb in the child with arthrogryposis. Hand Clincs. 2000; 16: 703-711.

  88. Ezaki M. An approach to the upper limb in arthrogryposis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010; 30: 57-62. doi: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e3181cda0cf.

  89. Trofimova S.I., Buklaev D.S., Petrova E.V., Mulevanova S.A. [Use of the guided growth method for the correction of knee flexion contracture in patients with arthrogryposis: preliminary results] // Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. - 2016. - Vol. 4. - No. 4. - P. 64-70. doi: 10.17816/PTORS4464-70

  90. Kit Song. Lower Extremity Deformity Management in Amyoplasia: When and How. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Sep;37 Suppl 2: S42-S47. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001030.

  91. van Bosse HJP, Ponten E, Wada A. et al. Treatment of the Lower Extremity Contracture / Deformities J. Pediatr Orthop. 2017 Jul/Aug;37 Suppl1:S.16-S23. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001005.

  92. Vavilov M.A., Blandinsky V.F., Gromov I.V., Baushev M.A. [Methods of I. Ponseti and M. Dobbs in the treatment of children with arthrogrypotic foot deformities]. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Orthopaedics named after G.A. Ilizarov No. 4, 2015. Issues of Pediatric Orthopaedics 2015. UDC 617.586-007.5:616.71-007.1–053.2 DOI 10.18019/1028-4427-2015-4-31-35

  93. M Ramanoudjame, P Loriaut, R Seringe, C Glorion, P Wicart. The surgical treatment of children with congenital convex foot (vertical talus): evaluation of midtarsal surgical release and open reduction. Bone Joint J.2014; 96-B (6):837-44. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B6.32313.

  94. Castaneda P, Tejerina P, Nualart L, Cassis N. The safety and efficacy of a transarticular pin for maintaining reduction in patients with developmental dislocation of the hip undergoing an open reduction. J Pediatr Orthop.2015; 35:358-362. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000284

  95. Batkin S.F. [Surgical treatment of infants and toddlers with hip dislocation in amyoplasia]: Cand. Sci. (Med.) Dissertation: 04.01.15: defense date: approved date / Batkin Sergey Fedorovich. - Saint Petersburg, 2021. - 203 p.

  96. Hamdy RC, vanBosse H, Altiok H, Abu-Dalu K, Kotlarsky P, Fafara A, Eidelman M. Treatment and outcomes of arthrogryposis in the lower extremity. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019 Sep;181(3):372-384. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31734

  97. Batkin S.F. [Evaluation of the efficacy of surgical treatment of hip dislocation in infants with congenital multiple arthrogryposis] // Consequences of Trauma and Infectious Complications of Bones and Sudy: Collection of Works of the VIII All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation Priorov Readings 2020 and Conference of Young Scientists, edited by Professor Ochurenko A.A. - Moscow, 2020. - P. 9-13.

  98. van Bosse H.J, Saldana R.E. Reorientational proximal femoral osteotomies for arthrogrypotic hip contractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Jan 4;99(1):55-64. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00304.

  99. Palocaren T., Thabet A.M., Rogers K., et al. Anterior distal femoral stapling for correcting knee flexion contracture in children with arthrogryposis-preliminary results. J Pediatr Orthop.2010 Mar;30(2):169-73. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181d07593.

  100. Pontén E. Management of the knees in arthrogryposis. J Child Orthop. 2015 Dec;9(6):465-72. doi: 10.1007/s11832-015-0695-3.

  101. Moreira MV, Rimoldi AC, Aoki S. Analysis on the results from percutaneous extensor osteotomy of the distal femur in patients with amyoplasia. Rev Bras Ortop. 2014 May 5;49(4):345-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rboe.2014.04.017

  102. Vorobyov A.A., Petrukhin A.V., Zasypkina O.L. et al. [Exoskeleton as a new tool in the habilitation and rehabilitation of disabled persons (review)] // STM. - 2015. - Vol. 7. - No. 2. - P. 185-197. doi: 10.17691/stm2015.7.2.22

  103. Rahman T., Whitney Sample W., Jayakumar Sh. et al. Passive exoskeletons for assisting limb movement. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43(5):583-90. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2005.04.0070.

  104. Lester R., Hall J.H, Ponten E., et al. Background to the 2nd International Symposium on Arthrogryposis. J Pediatr Orthop. Jul/Aug 2017;37 Suppl 1:S2-S3. doi: 10.1097/BPO. 0000000000000996

  105. Dahan-Oliel N, Cachecho S, Fąfara A, Lacombe F, Samargian A, Bussières A. Expert guidance for the rehabilitation of children with arthrogryposis: protocol using an integrated knowledge translation approach. Res InvolvEngagem. 2022 Feb 18;8(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00336-y.

  106. Kemp S, Roberts I, Gamble C, Wilkinson S, Davidson JE, Baildam EM, Cleary AG, McCann LJ, Beresford MW. A randomized comparative trial of generalized vs targeted physiotherapy in the management of childhood hypermobility. Rheumatology. 2010 Feb 1; 49(2):315-325.doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep362.

  107. Kristensen J, Franklyn-Miller A. Resistance training in musculoskeletal rehabilitation: a systematic review. British journal of sports medicine. 2012 Aug 1; 46(10):719-726.doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.079376.

  108. Legerlotz K. The effects of resistance training on health of children and adolescents with disabilities. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2020 Jul; 14(4):382-396.doi: 10.1177/1559827618759640.

  109. Bennett JB, Hansen PE, Granberry WM, Cain TE. Surgical management of arthrogryposis in the upper extremity. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1985 May 1; 5(3):281-286.doi: 10.1097/01241398-198505000-00004.

  110. Smith DW, Drennan JC. Arthrogryposis wrist deformities: results of infantile serial casting. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2002 Jan 1; 22(1):44-47.

  111. Tsuyuguchi Y, Masada K, Kawabata H, Kawai H, Ono K. Congenital clasped thumb: a review of forty-three cases. The Journal of hand surgery. 1985 Sep 1; 10(5):613-618.doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(85)80193-3.

  112. Niki H, Staheli LT, Mosca VS. Management of clubfoot deformity in amyoplasia. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1997 Nov 1; 17(6):803-807

  113. Asif S, Umer M, Beg R, Umar M. Operative treatment of bilateral hip dislocation in children with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2004 Jun; 12(1):4-9. doi: 10.1177/230949900401200102.

  114. Altiok H, Flanagan A, Krzak JJ, Hassani S. Quality of life, satisfaction with life, and functional mobility of young adults with arthrogryposis after leaving pediatric care. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019 Sep;181(3):461-468. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31717

  115. Nouraei H, Sawatzky B, MacGillivray M, Hall J. Long-term functional and mobility outcomes for individuals with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Am J Med Genet A 2017 May;173(5):1270-1278. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38169.

  116. Blair SN, Morris JN. Healthy hearts—and the universal benefits of being physically active: physical activity and health. Annalsofepidemiology. 2009 Apr 1;19(4):253-256.doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.

  117. Calatayud J, Casaña J, Ezzatvar Y, Jakobsen MD, Sundstrup E, Andersen LL. High-intensity preoperative training improves physical and functional recovery in the early post-operative periods after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017 Sep; 25:2864-72. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-3985-5..

  118. Ho CA, Karol LA. The utility of knee releases in arthrogryposis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2008 Apr 1; 28(3):307-313.doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181653bde.

  119. van Bosse HJ, Feldman DS, Anavian J, Sala DA. Treatment of knee flexion contractures in patients with arthrogryposis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 2007 Dec 1; 27(8):930-937.doi: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e3181594cd0.

  120. Steen U, Wekre LL, Vollestad NK. Physical functioning and activities of daily living in adults with amyoplasia, the most common form of arthrogryposis. Across-sectional study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Nov;40(23):2767-2779. doi: 10.1080/096382 88.2017.135 7211.

  121. Dubousset J., Guillaumat M. Long-term outcome for patients with arthrogryposis multiplex congenital. J Child Orthop. 2015 Dec;9(6):449-58. doi: 10.1007/s11832-015-0692-6.

  122. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 1122N dated December 6, 2021 "On the Approval of the National Schedule of Preventive Vaccinations, the Schedule of Preventive Vaccinations for Epidemic Indications, and the Procedure for Conducting Preventive Vaccinations". Revised on December 12, 2023.

  123. Hautier S., E Kermorvant E., Khen-Dunlop N. Prenatal path of care following the diagnosis of a malformation for which a novel prenatal therapy is available. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2020 Nov;6: S2468-7189(20)30325-1. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2020.11. 003.

  124. Donohoe M, Pruszcynski B, Rogers K, Bowen JR. Predicting ambulatory function based on infantile lower extremity posture types in amyoplasia arthrogryposis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019; 39 (7): e 531-e535. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001322.

  125. Agranovich O.E. [Principles of treatment of upper limb deformities in children with congenital multiple arthrogryposis] // Congenital and Acquired Pathology of the Upper Limbs in Children (Diagnosis, Treatment, Rehabilitation). Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation: Abstracts. - Saint Petersburg, 2016. - P. 8.

  126. Nematollahi S, Rampakakis E, Amara M et al. Health-related quality of life in 205 children with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Qual Life Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):247-260. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03808-8. Epub 2024 Oct 22. PMID: 39436578.

  127. Grill F. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenital. J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997 Jul;6(3):157-8. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199707000-00001.

  128. Dai S, Dieterich K, Jaeger M, et al. Disability in adults with arthrogryposis is severe, partly invisible, and varies by genotype. Neurology. 2018 May; 90(18): e1596-e1604. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005418.

  129. Steen U, Christensen E, Samargian A. Adults living with amyoplasia: function, psychosocial aspects, and the benefit of AMC Support Groups. J Pediatr Orthop 2017; 37 (Suppl 1) :S31-S32. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001003.

  130. Sawatzky B, Jones T, Miller R, Noureai H. The relationship between joint surgery and quality of life in adults with arthrogryposis: an international study. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019; 181(3):469-473. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31720.

  131. Cirillo A, Collins J, Sawatzky B, et al. Pain among children and adults living with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: a scoping review. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2019; 181 (3):436-453. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31725.

  132. Jones T, Miller R, Street JT, Sawatzky B. Validation of the Oswestry Disability Index for pain and disability in arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019; 62 (2): 92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.05.1319.

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

Agranovich O.E. – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Arthrogryposis Department, The Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Petrova E.V. – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Arthrogryposis Department, The Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Buklaev D.S. – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Arthrogryposis Department, The Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Trofimova S.I. – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Researcher at the Arthrogryposis Department, The Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Kochenova E.A. – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Physician at the Arthrogryposis Department, The Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Batkin S.F. – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Physician at the Arthrogryposis Department, The Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Savenkova A.A. – Functional Rehabilitation Physician, Exercise Therapy Physician, Physical Therapy Physician, The Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Ochurenko A.A. – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department for the Implementation of National Medical Research Center Functions, Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Melnik E.A. – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher at the Scientific Advisory Department, Neurologist, Geneticist at the Advisory Department, Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov.

Merkurieva E.S. – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Scientific Advisory Department, Geneticist at the Advisory Department, Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov.

Markova T.V. – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Chief Researcher, Head of the Scientific Advisory Department, Geneticist at the Advisory Department, Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov.

Dadali E.L. – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Chief Researcher at the Scientific Advisory Department, Geneticist at the Advisory Department, Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov.

Nikitin S.S. – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Genetics of Neurological Diseases, Institute of Higher and Additional Professional Education, Research Centre for Medical Genetics named after Academician N.P. Bochkov.

The authors declare no financial support or conflicts of interest that need to be disclosed.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

These clinical guidelines are based on current international clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with CMA.

Target audience for these clinical guidelines:

• Neonatologists

• Pediatricians

• General practitioners (family physicians)

• Medical geneticists

• Orthopedic traumatologists

• Pediatric surgeons

• Neurologists

• Radiologists

• Physicians in physical therapy (or physical and rehabilitation medicine physicians, or physiotherapists, or specialists with higher (non-medical) education (exercise therapy instructor-methods specialists), or specialists with secondary vocational (medical) education (exercise therapy instructors, medical massage nurses, physiotherapy nurses)).

• Functional diagnostics physicians

• Medical students

• Residents and postgraduate students

Methods used for evidence collection/selection:

electronic database searching.

Description of methods used for evidence collection/selection:

The evidence base for the recommendations consists of publications included in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases. The search depth was 30 years due to the rare occurrence of this pathology.

Methods used to assess the quality and strength of evidence:

• Expert consensus;

• Evaluation of significance according to the rating scheme.

1. Scale for assessing levels of evidence reliability (LER) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1.

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2.

Individual studies with reference method control or individual randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except for randomized clinical trials, with meta-analysis

3.

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4.

Non-comparative studies, case report

5.

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

2. Scale for assessing levels of evidence reliability (LER) for prevention, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on the use of natural therapeutic factors (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitation interventions)

LoE

Definition

1.

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2.

Individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3.

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4.

Non-comparative studies, case report or case series, case-control study

5.

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

3. Scale for assessing levels of recommendation persuasiveness (LRP) for methods of prevention, diagnostics, treatment, and medical rehabilitation, including those based on the use of natural therapeutic factors (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitation interventions)

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Methods used for evidence analysis:

• Reviews of published meta-analyses;

• Systematic reviews with evidence tables.

Description of methods used for evidence analysis:

When selecting publications as potential sources of evidence, the methodology used in each study is examined to ensure its validity. The result of this examination affects the level of evidence assigned to the publication, which in turn affects the strength of the recommendations derived from it.

The subjective factor can undoubtedly influence the assessment process. To minimize potential errors, each study was evaluated independently, i.e., by at least two independent members of the working group. Any discrepancies in assessments were discussed by the full working group. If consensus could not be reached, an independent expert was involved.

Evidence tables:

Evidence tables were completed by the members of the working group.

Methods used to formulate the recommendations:

Expert consensus.

Economic analysis:

Cost analysis was not performed, and pharmacoeconomic publications were not analyzed.

Method of recommendation validation:

• External peer review;

• Internal peer review.

Description of the guideline validation method:

The preliminary version of these guidelines was reviewed by independent experts, who were asked to comment primarily on how accessible the interpretation of the evidence underlying the recommendations is for understanding.

Comments were received from primary care physicians regarding the clarity of the presentation of the recommendations and their assessment of the importance of the recommendations as a working tool in daily practice.

The preliminary version was also sent to a non-medical reviewer for comments from the patients' perspective.

Comments received from experts were carefully systematized and discussed by the chair and members of the working group. Each point was discussed, and the resulting changes made to the recommendations were logged. If no changes were made, the reasons for refusing to make changes were logged.

Consultation and peer review:

The draft guidelines were reviewed by independent experts, who were asked to comment primarily on the clarity and accuracy of the interpretation of the evidence base underlying the recommendations.

Working Group:

For the final revision and quality control, the recommendations were re-evaluated by the members of the working group, who concluded that all comments and feedback from the experts had been taken into account and the risk of bias in the development of the recommendations was minimized.

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.

The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data regarding the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

Appendix A3.1 Regulatory legal acts used in the development of the clinical practice guideline

  1. Federal Law No. 489-FZ of December 25, 2018, "On Amendments to Article 40 of the Federal Law 'On Compulsory Medical Insurance in the Russian Federation' and the Federal Law 'The Fundamentals of Healthcare Protection in the Russian Federation' Regarding Clinical Practice Guidelines."

  2. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 103n dated February 28, 2019 (as amended on September 28, 2023) "On Approval of the Procedure and Timelines for the Development and Revision of Clinical Practice Guidelines, Their Standard Form, and Requirements for Their Structure, Composition, and Scientific Validity of Information Included Therein."

  3. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 804n dated October 13, 2017 (as amended on September 24, 2020) "On Approval of the Nomenclature of Medical Services."

  4. Order of the Ministry of Labor of Russia No. 687n dated December 10, 2024, "On Approval of the List of Indications and Contraindications for Providing Persons with Disabilities with Rehabilitation Equipment."

  5. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 747 dated December 19, 2025, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care in the Field of 'Obstetrics and Gynecology'."

  6. Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation No. 366n dated April 16, 2012 (as amended on February 21, 2020) "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Pediatric Care."

  7. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 274n dated April 21, 2022, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Patients with Congenital and (or) Hereditary Diseases."

  8. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1122n dated December 6, 2021 (as amended on December 12, 2023) "On Approval of the National Schedule of Preventive Vaccinations and the Schedule of Preventive Vaccinations by Epidemiological Indications." 

Main regulatory legal acts governing the provision of palliative medical care

  1. Federal Law "On Amendments to the Federal Law 'The Fundamentals of Healthcare Legislation in the Russian Federation' Regarding the Provision of Palliative Medical Care" No. 18-FZ dated March 6, 2019.

  2. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 208n and the Ministry of Labor of Russia No. 243n dated April 14, 2025, "On Approval of the Regulations on the Organization of Palliative Medical Care, Including the Procedure for Interaction Between Medical Organizations, Social Service Organizations, Public Associations, and Other Non-Profit Organizations Operating in the Healthcare Sector."

  3. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 398n dated July 9, 2025, "On Approval of the List of Medical Devices Intended to Support Human Organs and Body Systems Provided for Home Use."

  4. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 505n dated July 10, 2019, "On approval of the Procedure for the transfer by a medical organization to a patient (their legal representative) of medical devices intended to maintain the functions of human organs and body systems for home use in the provision of palliative medical care."

Appendix A3.2 Medical services used by specialists for medical rehabilitation measures in patients with AMA

A21.01.001 General medical massage

A21.30.004 Massage for musculoskeletal disorders in infants

A17.02.001 Muscle electrical stimulation

A17.04.001 Drug electrophoresis in joint diseases

A17.23.001 Drug electrophoresis in central nervous system and brain diseases

A17.23.003 Spinal cord electroneurostimulation

A20.30.036 Paraffin-ozokerite application

A19.30.003 Therapeutic gymnastics for musculoskeletal disorders in children

A19.04.001 Exercise therapy for joint diseases and injuries

A19.30.006 Mechanotherapy

A19.30.006.001 Robotic mechanotherapy

A19.04.001.012 Exercise therapy with biofeedback for joint diseases and injuries

A19.04.001.023 Exercise therapy using equipment and exercise machines for joint diseases and injuries

A19.23.003 Correction of motor function impairment using biofeedback

A19.23.004 Correction of motor function impairment using computer technologies

A19.30.007 Exercise therapy using an exercise machine

A19.30.009 Exercise therapy in the pool

A21.30.006 Occupational therapy

A13.30.001 Self-care training

A14.30.015 Training family members of the patient in techniques for moving and/or positioning in bed

A14.30.016 Patient self-help training for transfer in bed and/or wheelchair

A14.30.018 Patient self-help training for transfer using an additional support

A23.30.013 Use of games in rehabilitation programs

A23.30.015 Use of sports elements in rehabilitation programs

A23.30.017 Postural correction

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Patient with suspected arthrogryposis multiplex congenita

Appendix B. Algorithms of physician actions — Congenital multiple arthrogryposis

Treatment algorithm for congenital upper limb deformities in AMA

Appendix B. Algorithms of physician actions — Congenital multiple arthrogryposis
* - functional range of motion in the joint

Treatment algorithm for congenital foot deformities in AMA

Appendix B. Algorithms of physician actions — Congenital multiple arthrogryposis

** - CDA - compression-distraction apparatus

Treatment algorithm for knee contractures in AMA

Appendix B. Algorithms of physician actions — Congenital multiple arthrogryposis

Treatment algorithm for hip joint pathology in AMA

Appendix B. Algorithms of physician actions — Congenital multiple arthrogryposis

Appendix C. Patient Information

Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita (AMC) is a term used to describe a group of congenital disorders characterized by congenital joint contractures in two or more body segments. The term "contracture" refers to a limitation of the range of motion in a joint.

Currently, more than 400 causes of this disease have been identified: viral and bacterial infections, physical factors, chemical agents, medications, intrauterine crowding (uterine shape anomalies), placental insufficiency, polyhydramnios, etc. Maternal history may include various diseases, pregnancy toxicosis, miscarriages, abortions, etc.

There is no definitive consensus on the pathogenesis of arthrogryposis. The impact of a teratogenic factor in early pregnancy (weeks 5–6) disrupts the development of muscle fibers and joints, or leads to primary spinal cord injury, which in turn causes secondary muscle changes and impaired fetal motor activity. Variants of AMC include amyoplasia, distal arthrogryposis, and syndromes whose clinical symptom is multiple contractures.

In amyoplasia, involvement of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, and knee joints, hand and foot deformities, and potential spinal deformities are observed. Muscle tissue is characteristically replaced by fibrous or fatty tissue, resulting in the absence of active joint movement. In amyoplasia, all four limbs are involved in 63% of cases (i.e., upper and lower limb contractures, typically symmetrical); involvement of three limbs is observed in 5% of cases, upper limbs in 17%, and lower limbs exclusively in 15%.

Distal arthrogryposis is characterized predominantly by hand and foot deformities, which in some cases are combined with pathology of large limb joints and maxillofacial anomalies.

In the vast majority of cases, deformities are symmetrical and do not progress during the child's life.

Internal organ involvement is rare. The intelligence of patients is preserved in the vast majority of cases.

Amyoplasia is not hereditary; at the same time, distal forms, as well as syndromic forms of AMC, are classified as hereditary diseases.

The key to successful treatment of patients with arthrogryposis is the early initiation of conservative treatment (from the first week of life) aimed at eliminating contractures and improving active joint motion.

Timely initiation of conservative treatment allows for complete elimination of contractures or a significant reduction in their severity in a number of cases.

If limb deformities persist after conservative treatment, surgical treatment is indicated starting from the child's age of 3–4 months.

The prescription of orthotic and prosthetic devices (OPDs) plays an important role in preventing the recurrence of contractures.

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Rating scales, questionnaires, and other assessment tools for the patient's condition are not provided in the clinical practice guidelines.

Scales and calculators from this guideline

Rockall score (pre-EGD)Risk assessment in gastrointestinal bleeding prior to endoscopy

If you practice in traumatology and orthopedics

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines directly in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer based on the guideline "Arthrogryposis Multiplex Congenita" and other current Russian Ministry of Health CPGs with a reference to the section rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to set up ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian CPGs

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines