Benign Ovarian Neoplasms: Clinical Guidelines

Applies toadults, children2025 editionD27, N83, Q50.1, Q50.5

Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults, children. 2025 Edition, ICD-10 codes: D27, N83, Q50.1, Q50.5. On the page — abridged version by WhiteCoat Pro and the full official text.

Receive research articles on "Benign Ovarian Neoplasms"Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in Russian, with figures, sample size, and conclusion. Plus what changes in Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary of the guideline text, 2025 edition. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

Benign ovarian neoplasms are cystic or solid formations with minimal malignant potential; they are often asymptomatic and detected incidentally on ultrasound. The guideline describes diagnostics, malignancy risk assessment, management of functional cysts, and surgical tactics in various age groups, including pregnant women.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Collect complaints and anamnesis: most tumors are asymptomatic; warning signs include acute abdomen symptoms due to torsion, rupture, hemorrhage, or suppuration, as well as manifestations of hormonal activity. → in text
  2. Perform a gynecological examination: external genitalia, cervix using specula, bimanual examination, rectovaginal examination — as indicated; LVE C, LOR 5. → in text
  3. Order a comprehensive pelvic ultrasound as a first-line examination; use a transvaginal probe whenever possible; LVE C, LOR 5. → in text
  4. During ultrasound, describe the mass according to IOTA or O-RADS; IOTA criteria for benign and malignant tumors have a sensitivity of up to 95% and specificity of up to 91%; LVE C, LOR 5. → in text
  5. If a malignant process is suspected, test for tumor markers: CA125 and HE4; in women under 40 years old with an adnexal mass, additionally consider hCG, LDH, and AFP; LVE C, LOR 5. → in text
  6. Calculate the RMI preoperatively; a value >200 increases the probability of ovarian cancer and warrants oncological alertness; LVE B, LOR 3. → in text
  7. Definitively confirming the benign nature is only possible via pathomorphological examination of the removed surgical specimen; LVE C, LOR 5. → in text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

Do functional ovarian cysts need to be treated with COCs?

No. COCs do not accelerate the regression of functional cysts; expectant management without medications yields comparable results. An exception is the prophylactic use of COCs in cases of recurrent hemorrhagic cysts, cyst rupture, or a history of apoplexy. → in text

When can a simple ovarian cyst be observed without surgery?

If the cyst is newly detected, asymptomatic, simple/unilocular, unilateral, up to 5 cm, and has benign ultrasound features, with a normal CA125, watchful waiting is chosen. Repeat comprehensive ultrasound is performed in 2–3 months. → in text

What tumor markers should be ordered for an ovarian mass?

If malignancy is suspected, CA125 and HE4 are used. In women under 40 years old, hCG, LDH, and AFP are additionally considered; in bilateral masses, CEA, CA19-9, and CA15-3 may be used to rule out metastases. → in text

Can an ovarian cyst be punctured for diagnostic purposes?

No, puncture of a cystic ovarian lesion is not recommended: aspiration biopsy has low diagnostic value, with a sensitivity of no more than 25%, and carries a risk of dissemination. In case of ultrasound signs of malignancy, puncture is strictly contraindicated. → in text

How to manage an ovarian mass in a pregnant woman?

Ultrasound is the first-line method. Most masses in the first trimester are functional cysts and regress in the second trimester; about 80–95% of cysts <6 cm in pregnant women regress spontaneously. CA125 is not used during pregnancy because it can be elevated throughout pregnancy. → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
984, Edition 1 (ID 984_1)
Publication date
December 17, 2025
Age category
adults, children
ICD-10 codes
D27N83Q50.1Q50.5
Specialties
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Developers
Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Official text
Rubricator of the Russian Ministry of Health — 984_1

Abridged Clinical Guidelines: Benign Ovarian Neoplasms

The abridged version of this guideline by WhiteCoat Pro is 180 pages long: each section of the document is summarized concisely and in its own words, with tests and fill-in-the-blanks for self-assessment. Needed when the guideline must not only be read, but memorized — for an exam, accreditation, or clinical practice.
All abbreviated guidelines: 257
Beginning of abbreviated version — open

1.1 Definition

Benign ovarian neoplasms — cystic or solid ovarian formations characterized by the absence of pathological elements and blood flow, as well as minimal malignant potential.

1.2 Etiology and Pathogenesis

Etiology and pathogenesis remain not fully understood.

Histogenesis (sources of tumors):

The source can be any structure of the ovary:

  • Surface epithelium;
  • Granulosa cells;
  • Theca tissue;
  • Leydig cells;
  • Embryonic structures;
  • Connective tissue, etc.

Classification of ovarian tumors (based on histogenesis):

  • Epithelial;
  • Mesenchymal;
  • Mixed epithelial-mesenchymal;
  • Sex cord-stromal tumors;
  • Germ cell tumors;
  • Mixed germ cell and sex cord-stromal tumors.

Pathogenesis of epithelial neoplasms:

There are two main theories of origin from inclusion cysts:

  • Due to metaplasia of the ovarian surface epithelium.
  • Due to implantation of the tubal epithelium onto the ovarian surface followed by invagination (formation of the cyst-lining epithelium).

Pathogenesis of non-epithelial tumors (stromal cell and germ cell):

  • Epidemiology: more common in children and young women.
  • Mechanism: exposure to adverse factors during embryogenesis, leading to mutations in genes responsible for normal cell development.

Associated pathological processes:

  • Atrophy of the ovaries and fallopian tubes:
  • Characteristics: reduction in size, loss of structural integrity, and functional activity of the organs.
  • Distinction: should be differentiated from age-related physiological involution.
  • Etiology of acquired atrophy: caused by exogenous and endogenous damaging factors:
  • Chronic inflammation;
  • Surgical interventions;
  • Chemotherapy;
  • Radiation therapy;
  • Autoimmune processes.
  • Cystic developmental anomalies of the ovary:
  • Causes: embryonic developmental disorders or hormonal dysregulation.
  • Clinical presentation: may manifest in various age groups.

General information on adnexal pathology

  • Age spectrum: The pathology occurs in all age groups (from newborns to adult women).
  • Spectrum of diseases: Varies from functional cysts to complex neoplastic masses.
  • Prolapse and hernia of the ovary and fallopian tube:
  • Definition: A rare condition, displacement of the ovary and/or tube outside their anatomical localization (into the inguinal canal, postoperative hernias, etc.).
  • Epidemiology: Most frequently in girls and adolescents. Less commonly in women of reproductive or elderly age.

Occurrence statistics:

  • Total frequency: 13.3% among all gynecological pathologies.
  • Structure of neoplasms:
  • Cystadenomas: 80%.
  • Sex cord-stromal tumors: 14.9% (among them: granulosa cell tumors — 28.2%, thecomas and fibromas — 6.4%).

Age-related features:

  • Benign ovarian tumors occur at any age.
  • Main group (69.1%): women aged 31 to 60 years.

Pregnancy-specific features:

  • Tumor frequency: 0.5 – 3.4%.
  • First trimester (ultrasound screening): corpus luteum cysts are most frequently detected.
  • Prognosis of corpus luteum cysts: spontaneous regression within 2–4 months.

Inguinal hernias:

  • Account for 3–6% of total hernias in women.
  • In girls, the hernia sac contains the ovary and tube in 15–30% of cases.
The official full text of the guideline below remains open and free. Only the condensed study version as a whole is paid: section-by-section explanations, self-assessment tests, and integration with platform materials.

List of Abbreviations

AFP

- α-fetoprotein

WHO

- World Health Organization

OT

- ovarian tumor

BOT

- benign ovarian tumor

CT

- computed tomography

LDH

- lactate dehydrogenase

MRI

- magnetic resonance imaging

PET-CT

- positron emission tomography

CEA

- carcinoembryonic antigen

β-hCG

- beta-human chorionic gonadotropin

CDI

- color Doppler mapping

O-RADS

- standardized ultrasound classification system for ovarian tumors

CA 19-9

- cancer antigen 19-9 - Carbohydrate antigen 19-9

CA 72-4

- cancer antigen 72-4 - Carbohydrate antigen 72-4

CA125

- cancer antigen 125 - Carbohydrate antigen 125

IOTA

- International Ovarian Tumor Analysis - International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group

HE4

- Human epididymis protein 4 - human epididymis protein 4

RCOG

- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists - Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (UK)

RMI

- Risk of Malignancy Index - Risk of Malignancy Index

Terms and Definitions

Benign ovarian neoplasms are cystic or solid ovarian masses without pathological elements and blood flow, having a minimal potential for malignant transformation [1].

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Benign ovarian neoplasms are cystic or solid ovarian masses without pathological elements and blood flow, having a minimal potential for malignant transformation [1].

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

The etiology and pathogenesis of benign ovarian neoplasms remain incompletely understood to date. All structures of the ovary (surface epithelium, granulosa cells, theca tissue, Leydig cells, embryonic structures, connective tissue, etc.) are potential histogenetic sources of ovarian tumors. Therefore, ovarian tumors are subdivided into: epithelial, mesenchymal, mixed epithelial-mesenchymal, sex cord-stromal, germ cell, and mixed germ cell and sex cord-stromal tumors [2].

There are two main theories regarding the pathogenesis of epithelial ovarian masses: their development from inclusion cysts due to metaplasia of the ovarian surface epithelium, and their formation from inclusion cysts whose lining epithelium is formed as a result of the implantation of tubal epithelium onto the ovarian surface followed by invagination [3], [4], [5], [6], [7].

In the origin of non-epithelial tumors (stromal-cell and germ cell), which are more common in young women and children, adverse factors during embryogenesis are considered to play the primary role, resulting in mutations in various genes responsible for normal cell development [8], [9], [10].

Atrophy of the ovaries and Fallopian tubes is a pathological process characterized by a reduction in size, loss of structural integrity, and functional activity of these organs. Unlike age-related physiological involution, acquired atrophy is caused by exogenous and endogenous damaging factors, including chronic inflammation, surgical interventions, chemo- and radiotherapy, as well as autoimmune processes.

Cystic developmental anomalies of the ovary arise as a result of embryonic development disorders or hormonal dysregulation. They can manifest across various age groups, from newborns to adult women, and range from functional cysts to complex tumor masses.

Prolapse and hernia of the ovary and Fallopian tube is a rare condition in which the ovary and/or tube are displaced beyond their anatomical location (into the inguinal canal, postoperative hernias, etc.). It occurs most frequently in girls and adolescents, and less commonly in women of reproductive or elderly age.

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

The incidence of benign ovarian tumors is 13.3% among all gynecological pathologies. Cystadenomas account for 80% of all ovarian neoplasms. Sex cord-stromal tumors are detected in 14.9%, among which granulosa cell tumors account for 28.2%, and thecomas and fibromas account for 6.4% [10], [11].

Benign ovarian tumors (BOTs) occur in women of any age. The majority of patients with BOTs (69.1%) belong to the age group between 31 and 60 years.

The incidence of ovarian tumors in pregnant women is 0.5–3.4%. During ultrasound screening in the 1st trimester of pregnancy, corpus luteum cysts are most commonly detected, which spontaneously regress within 2–4 months [12].

Inguinal hernias in women account for 3–6% of the total number, and 15% to 30% contain the ovary and tube in girls [13].

Risk factors for the development of BOTs include: genetic predisposition; chronic inflammatory pelvic diseases; early or late menarche; late onset of menopause; smoking; obesity, diabetes mellitus; PCOS; ovarian hyperstimulation [14], [15].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

D27 – Benign neoplasm of ovary

N83.0 – Follicular cyst of ovary

N83.1 – Corpus luteum cyst

N83.2 – Other and unspecified ovarian cysts

N83.3 – Acquired atrophy of ovary and Fallopian tube

N83.4 – Prolapse and hernia of ovary and Fallopian tube

N83.5 – Torsion of ovary, ovarian pedicle and Fallopian tube

N83.6 – Hematosalpinx

N83.7 – Hematoma of broad ligament

N83.8 – Other noninflammatory disorders of ovary, Fallopian tube and broad ligament

N83.9 – Noninflammatory disorder of ovary, Fallopian tube and broad ligament, unspecified

Q50.1 – Cystic developmental anomaly of ovary.

Q50.5 – Embryonic cyst of broad ligament

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

1.5.1 WHO Classification (2020):

Currently, the most relevant and substantiated histological classification of ovarian tumors is the one adopted by the WHO in 2020, taking into account modern concepts of the pathogenesis of ovarian tumors, as well as their molecular-genetic and biological features [2]. See Appendix B.

In accordance with the WHO classification (2020), the main nosological groups are formed by categories[2]: epithelial, stromal, mesenchymal tumors, sex cord-stromal tumors, germ cell tumors, mixed, tumor-like conditions, secondary (metastatic) tumors.

Depending on morphological signs of cellular atypia and the presence of invasion, ovarian tumors are subdivided into: benign tumor, uncertain malignant potential or borderline tumor, carcinoma in situ, malignant invasive tumor [2].

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

In the vast majority of cases, ovarian tumors are asymptomatic [12].

Clinical symptoms appear upon:

✓ the occurrence of complications (tumor torsion, rupture, hemorrhage, suppuration of the ovarian mass) – "acute abdomen" symptoms;

✓ the development of ascites, hydrothorax in combination with the presence of an ovarian neoplasm (for Meigs' syndrome);

✓ hormonal activity of the tumor (symptoms of androgen or estrogen hyperproduction in sex cord-stromal tumors; symptoms of hyperthyroidism in dysgerminomas) [12].

Signs of androgen-producing tumors:

✓ defeminization – development of virilization – disappearance of female secondary sex characteristics, oligo-/amenorrhea,

✓ masculinization (virilization) – appearance of male secondary sex characteristics (hirsutism, male-pattern redistribution of adipose tissue, deepening of the voice) [16], [17], [18], [19].

Signs of estrogen-producing tumors:

✓ precocious puberty;

✓ menstrual irregularities of the AUB type in reproductive age;

✓ development of hormone-induced endometrial hyperplasia,

✓ absence of signs of age-related atrophy of the external and internal genitalia in postmenopause [16], [17].

Patients with asymptomatic BOTs should be informed about the signs and symptoms of ovarian torsion [20]. A number of retrospective studies have shown that at least 80% of ovarian torsions occur with ovarian masses 5 cm or more in diameter [21], [22], [23], [24].

The most common histological subtypes of ovarian masses in ovarian torsion are corpus luteum cysts, mature teratomas, and serous cystadenomas [21], [23], [25].

Acquired atrophy of the ovaries and Fallopian tubes leads to menstrual irregularities and infertility.

In some cases, tubo-ovarian masses are formed, involving the Fallopian tubes (in the form of hydrosalpinx or hematosalpinx); the main symptom of these masses is pain.

Pronounced pain is also observed in hematoma of the broad ligament of the uterus.

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

The diagnosis is established based on patient complaints and medical history, physical examination, and instrumental diagnostic methods (pelvic ultrasound, pelvic MRI, diagnostic laparoscopy).

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

See the "Clinical Presentation" section.

2.2 Physical Examination

It is recommended to perform a visual inspection of the external genitalia, inspection of the cervix using specula, bimanual vaginal examination, and rectovaginal examination (as indicated) [16], [26].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: Gynecological examination is not always informative.

Bimanual and rectovaginal examination allows determining the size of the tumor, mobility, surface, consistency of the tumor masses, tenderness, unilateral or bilateral nature of the lesion, mutual arrangement of the pelvic organs, examining the pouch of Douglas, the anterior wall of the rectum, parametria, etc. However, in patients with a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2, its use is limited [16].

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

No specific laboratory diagnostics for BOTs have been developed.

It is recommended to perform a serum tumor marker assay for differential diagnosis when a malignant process is suspected [16], [27], [28], [29], [30].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: most biochemical markers for ovarian cancer are non-specific, so their use for primary diagnosis of ovarian neoplasms is limited. Cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymis secretory protein 4 (HE4) are the most studied markers for ovarian cancer. A CA 125 level >35 IU/ml or higher is detected in 78-100% of patients with ovarian cancer (mainly in the serous form) [31], [32]. At the same time, CA125 can be elevated during pregnancy, endometriosis, and any inflammatory process [30], [33]. As an additional marker, the best results were obtained for HE4, which is more sensitive and specific than CA 125 for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer (73% vs. 43.3% and 95% vs. 76.4%, respectively). However, it is elevated in endometriosis and can be false-positive in benign tumors [32], [33]. Tumor markers specific for germ cell ovarian tumors include: human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)—a specific marker for pure dysgerminoma (elevated in almost 100% of cases) [27], [28], [30]. In women under 40 years of age with adnexal masses, rare forms of ovarian cancer must be considered, and further measurements of tumor markers should be performed, including human chorionic gonadotropin, lactate dehydrogenase, and alpha-fetoprotein levels [29].

In bilateral ovarian masses, for differential diagnosis and to rule out metastatic ovarian lesions, additional serum tumor marker tests are used, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3). CEA levels are elevated in colorectal cancer, CA 15-3 in breast cancer, and less frequently in colorectal, lung, ovarian, cervical, and endometrial cancer. CA 19-9 is a tumor marker for lesions of the pancreas, liver, bile ducts, sigmoid colon, and rectum [29], [34], [35].

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

It is recommended to prescribe a comprehensive pelvic ultrasound examination (transvaginal and transabdominal) (ultrasound) using a transvaginal ultrasound transducer (where possible) in patients with suspected ovarian tumor as the primary instrumental diagnostic method for the disease [20].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: Ultrasound should be used at the primary stage of evaluation in all age groups of patients [20], [36], [37].

Reduced ovarian size and the absence of antral follicles are characteristic of acquired atrophy of the ovaries and fallopian tubes.

Ultrasound diagnostics is indispensable in diagnosing hematosalpinx due to detailed visualization of the degree of fallopian tube lumen dilation, wall thickness, and the homogeneity or layering of the contents within the lumen.

Ultrasound diagnostics allows the detection of a hematoma between the leaves of the broad ligament.

The primary diagnostic method for a cystic developmental anomaly of the ovary is ultrasound examination, which allows for the evaluation of the size, structure, and nature of the cyst.

A high-frequency scanner detects the structure of the ovary and fallopian tube within the hernia sac, and Doppler ultrasound detects the presence or absence of blood flow in case of torsion, which is diagnostically significant for prolapse and herniation of the ovary and fallopian tube.

It is recommended to use standard descriptions and terminology for ovarian neoplasms (International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group, standardized O-RADS scale) in ultrasound diagnostics [38], [39].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: Based on randomized trials, the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group has developed ultrasound criteria for benign and malignant ovarian tumors ("B-rules" and "M-rules", respectively), with sensitivity and specificity reaching 95% and 91%, respectively [38], [40], [41] (See Appendix A3.1). One of the modern promising systems for assessing the ultrasound characteristics of ovarian tumors is the standardized O-RADS (Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System) scale published in 2018 by the American College of Radiology, aimed at improving interdisciplinary collaboration among specialists (functional diagnosticians, gynecologists, and oncologists) and increasing diagnostic accuracy [42], [43]. (See Appendix A3.1).

It is not recommended to use computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis for routine diagnosis of ovarian tumors [20], [36].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: MRI is not recommended as a primary diagnostic examination for the detection of ovarian tumors [20], [36], [37]. Pelvic MRI is used as an additional imaging method in cases of "indeterminate" ovarian masses on ultrasound (sensitivity and specificity of the method are 96.6% and 94.0%, respectively) [20], [44].

It is recommended to perform pelvic MRI with intravenous contrast enhancement when ovarian malignancy cannot be ruled out based on ultrasound and unenhanced MRI; in cases of combined pelvic disorders, or extensive adhesions from previous surgeries [20], [44].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: Contrast-enhanced MRI improves the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors to a greater extent than color Doppler ultrasound, unenhanced MRI, and CT. Contrast-enhanced MRI is indicated to clarify the anatomical relationships of the structures evaluated, the tumor growth pattern, to detect signs of ascites, and for patients in whom pelvic ultrasound is uninformative [20], [44].

It is recommended to calculate the Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian masses at the preoperative stage [29], [45].

GPP BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3).

Comment: RMI calculation should be used as part of the comprehensive assessment of ovarian masses prior to surgical treatment. The sensitivity and specificity of this method reach 70–78% and 87–90%, respectively [29], [45], whereas the sensitivity and specificity of measuring CA 125 levels alone in peri- and postmenopausal patients do not exceed 78%. Normally, the RMI does not exceed 200. An increase above 200 is a predictor of ovarian cancer development. (See Appendix A3.1). It has been established that the ultrasound criteria developed by IOTA are more accurate than the RMI [45].

It is recommended to consult an oncologist (appointment, examination, consultation) if an ovarian malignancy is suspected [20], [36].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: patients with ovarian masses should be referred to an oncologist if there is a high risk of ovarian cancer based on family history [20], [36]; a high risk of ovarian cancer according to the IOTA or RMI prognostic models [38], [42]; fixed pelvic tumor masses or bilateral firm or nodular tumor masses in postmenopausal patients; ascites; or suspicion of regional or distant metastases [20].

It is not recommended to perform puncture of cystic ovarian masses (according to the NMU – ovarian cyst puncture and exudate aspiration) [20], [36].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: aspiration biopsy of tumor contents has low informative value, its sensitivity for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors does not exceed 25%, and the risk of tumor dissemination is high; it is strictly not recommended in the presence of ultrasound signs of malignancy in order to preserve ablastics [20].

It is recommended to perform laparoscopy as a diagnostic and direct treatment method for benign ovarian tumors [20].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: the use of a laparoscopic approach allows for determining tumor mobility, assessing the internal structure of the mass, taking a biopsy to determine the morphological structure of the disease and the extent of the process, and visualizing small ovarian tumors that do not cause gross volumetric transformation. During diagnostic laparoscopy, a biopsy may be taken only from a solid tumor with immediate intraoperative morphological examination and cytological examination of peritoneal fluid [12].

It is recommended to perform pathomorphological examination of the surgical specimen to confirm the benign nature of the ovarian tumor (according to the NMU – Pathological examination of ovarian biopsy (surgical) material) [20].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: a definitive conclusion regarding the nature of the process (benign/malignant) and the prognosis of the disease can only be made after receiving the results of a detailed morphological examination of the resected gross specimen [20].

2.5 Other Procedures

Absent

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

3.1 Medical treatment

It is not recommended to use combined oral contraceptives ((COCs) – according to ATC: Progestogens and estrogens, fixed combinations), progestogens (according to ATC: Progestogens), and levonorgestrel in the form of an intrauterine therapeutic system ((LNG-IUS) – according to ATC: Plastic gestagen-containing IUDs) in patients with benign ovarian masses [29], [46].

GGR CLOC 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment: the prescription of COCs (according to ATC: Progestogens and estrogens, fixed combinations) does not accelerate the regression of functional ovarian cysts. Expectant management in patients with functional ovarian cysts without medical treatment achieves recovery rates similar to those with the use of COCs (according to ATC: Progestogens and estrogens, fixed combinations) [20], [29], [46]. Prophylactic use of COCs (according to ATC: Progestogens and estrogens, fixed combinations) is justified in patients with a history of recurrent hemorrhagic cysts, cyst rupture, and ovarian apoplexy [20], [29], [47].

3.2 Surgical Treatment

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment for benign ovarian masses primarily using a laparoscopic approach (according to the ICD-11/local medical service registry: Ovarian cyst removal using video-endoscopic technologies) when conditions permit and contraindications are absent [34].

GPP ALOE 1Level of Recommendations Assurance A (level of evidence – 1).

Comments: Laparoscopic approach is preferred over laparotomy. Laparoscopy is associated with a shorter hospital stay, faster recovery, less pain, and less bleeding compared to laparotomy [48].

It is recommended to perform ovarian resection (according to the local medical service registry: Ovarian cyst removal using video-endoscopic technologies) in patients of reproductive age with benign ovarian masses [20], [36], [37].

GGR CLOC 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment: The goals of surgical intervention in reproductive-age patients with benign ovarian masses are: 1) complete removal of the neoplasm; 2) preservation of reproductive function [20].

In order to preserve ovarian reserve, patients of reproductive age with benign ovarian masses should undergo ovarian resection by enucleating the cyst capsule, minimizing trauma to the cortical layer and maximally preserving healthy ovarian tissue. In cases of uterine adnexal torsion in reproductive-age patients with benign ovarian masses, detorsion is permissible if signs of tissue viability are preserved. Ovarian apoplexy accompanied by bleeding requires coagulation of the rupture site with enucleation of the cyst wall.

It is important during surgery for benign ovarian masses to adhere to the principles of ablastics, removing the capsule of the cystic formation within an endobag in an ablastic manner [48].

For large ovarian masses, hemostasis of the bed after enucleation should be performed using bipolar coagulation or a defocused laser beam, and structural integrity should be restored by suturing the ovary including the base using absorbable suture material, which promotes proper reparative regeneration, preserves ovarian reserve, and prevents adhesions.

Surgical treatment of hematosalpinx in reproductive-age patients should aim to preserve the fallopian tube, although in some cases its removal is required.

Surgical treatment of a broad ligament hematoma depends on the size, clinical presentation, and cause of the condition.

It is recommended to perform adnexectomy in postmenopausal patients with benign ovarian masses (according to the local medical service registry: Salpingo-oophorectomy using video-endoscopic technologies; Open salpingo-oophorectomy) [20], [36], [37].

GGR CLOC 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment: Prior to surgical treatment, the surgical approach and extent of surgery must be agreed upon with the patient. The extent of surgical treatment depends on concomitant pathology [20]. If adjacent organs are involved, the surgical team must include profile specialists (urologist, general surgeon, oncologist, etc.) [20].

3.3 Other Treatment

Treatment of reproductive-age patients with acquired atrophy of the ovaries and fallopian tubes aims to correct menstrual cycle disorders, and in the presence of complaints of infertility – early reproductive assistance.

The treatment tactics for patients with cystic developmental anomalies of the ovary depend on the patient's age, and the size and nature of the cyst. Functional cysts in newborns and children often do not require intervention and are subject to dynamic monitoring.

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

It is recommended to have an examination (consultation) by a physical therapy doctor to determine the tactics of rehabilitation treatment for patients with benign ovarian tumors after surgical treatment [49].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

It is recommended to conduct annual preventive examinations within the framework of primary health care for the early detection of ovarian masses and the prevention of recurrence [20], [49].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: To detect neoplasms and abnormalities of the internal reproductive organs, a bimanual pelvic examination and comprehensive pelvic ultrasound (transvaginal and transabdominal) are performed.

No special diet therapy, dietary supplements, vitamins, or mineral supplements are prescribed as a method of treating the disease in patients with benign ovarian tumors [20], [49].

It is recommended for newly diagnosed ovarian masses with benign ultrasound characteristics (functional cysts) that are not accompanied by clinical symptoms, to undergo dynamic monitoring with a repeat comprehensive pelvic ultrasound (transvaginal and transabdominal) in 2–3 months [20].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: regardless of the women's age, asymptomatic, simple, unilateral, unilocular ovarian cysts less than 5 cm in diameter have a low risk of malignancy (risk of malignancy <1%) [50], [51], [52]. Large prospective studies have shown that most simple cystic formations undergo spontaneous regression within a short time, regardless of the patient's age. Corpus luteum cysts or functional ovarian cysts (hemorrhagic cysts) less than 5 cm in diameter regress spontaneously within 2–3 months [53], [54]. Surgical intervention is not performed in patients with newly diagnosed asymptomatic simple or unilocular cystic ovarian masses up to 5 cm in diameter. With normal serum CA 125 levels, the management is conservative, with a follow-up examination in 2–3 months.

True tumors and tumors suspicious of malignancy require surgical treatment. Hemorrhagic ovarian cysts (corpus luteum cysts and functional cysts) should not occur in childhood (before puberty) and in postmenopausal women. If they are diagnosed in these patients, they require additional evaluation and surgical treatment [36], [37].

6. Organization of Medical Care

It is recommended to hospitalize patients with benign ovarian masses for medical care in hospitals of the appropriate level, depending on the size of the ovarian mass, the presence of concomitant somatic pathology, adhesions, etc. [38].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: emergency care can be provided in level 1 and level 2 hospitals. Medical care in level 3 hospitals is provided in the presence of severe concomitant somatic pathology in patients with ovarian masses, large tumors, combination with pronounced adhesions involving adjacent organs, tumors of undetermined origin, conditions requiring high-tech care, or preservation of reproductive system function

It is recommended prior to surgery for a benign ovarian mass to obtain the patient's informed consent for the planned scope of surgery and the possibility of expanding the scope if malignant pathology is detected [38].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: Before laparoscopy, the following issues should be discussed with the patient [38]:

- What laparoscopy involves;

- Benefits and risks;

- Potential impact on ovarian reserve and fertility;

- Potential extent of surgical treatment if malignant pathology is detected.

Indications for emergency hospitalization to a medical organization [38]:

2) cyst rupture or torsion of the cyst pedicle;

3) Pain syndrome in the presence of pelvic masses;

4) Symptoms of acute abdomen.

Given the need to provide specialized, including high-tech, medical care to patients with benign ovarian masses, hospitalization in a level 3 medical organization is recommended.

If adjacent organs are involved, consultation with relevant specialists is required.

7. Additional Information

7.1 Treatment and management tactics for patients with benign adnexal masses of the uterus during pregnancy

The incidence of benign ovarian masses during pregnancy is 2% [55]. Most of these masses are discovered during the first trimester of pregnancy and are functional cysts that spontaneously regress in the second trimester of pregnancy. About 80–95% of ovarian cysts smaller than 6 cm in diameter spontaneously regress in pregnant women [55].

The management of female patients with pelvic masses detected in the first trimester is determined by clinical, anamnestic, and sonographic data. Most frequently, these cystic ovarian masses in the first trimester present as corpus luteum cysts, which regress spontaneously. In the absence of positive dynamics, an ovarian tumor is diagnosed, which in most cases is a mature teratoma or serous cystadenoma [55]. Ovarian tumors persisting throughout pregnancy are most commonly functional cysts with a very low malignancy rate or mature cystic teratomas with a malignant transformation rate ranging from 2% to 6% [55].

It is recommended to perform ultrasound examination (first-line imaging) for the diagnosis of ovarian tumors in pregnant women [55], [56].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: Depending on the gestational age, in some cases it is advisable to perform abdominal ultrasound due to the displacement of the tumor beyond the lesser pelvis by the gravid uterus. If necessary and indicated, based on a multidisciplinary team decision, non-contrast CT and MRI may be used [71,72]. Performing MRI (second-line examination, following ultrasound) in pregnant women with unclassified ovarian masses for definitive diagnosis and differential diagnosis between benign and malignant neoplasms [56].

  • Measurement of CA 125 level is not recommended, as its levels may be elevated throughout pregnancy [20], [55].

GGR CLOC 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment for benign ovarian tumors in pregnant women, preferably using a laparoscopic approach (if conditions permit and there are no contraindications) [48], [55], [57].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: Surgery in pregnant women should be performed by an experienced physician in a level III facility. Fetal heart rate monitoring is necessary in the perioperative period [58], [57]. Surgical intervention during pregnancy may complicate its subsequent course. However, pregnancy outcomes after elective surgical treatment for benign ovarian tumors are better than those performed on an emergency basis due to the development of complications [57].

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

No.

Quality criteria

Evaluation of compliance

1.

Visual inspection of the external genitalia, inspection of the cervix using specula, bimanual vaginal examination were performed

Yes/No

2.

Comprehensive pelvic ultrasound examination using a transvaginal probe (where possible) was performed in patients with suspected ovarian tumor

Yes/No

3.

Ovarian resection was performed in reproductive-age patients with benign ovarian tumors

Yes/No

4.

To confirm the benign nature of the ovarian tumor, pathomorphological examination of the surgical specimen was performed (according to the Nomenclature of Medical Services: Pathological examination of ovarian biopsy (surgical) material)

Yes/No

References

Show references

[1] The Role of the Obstetrician-Gynecologist in the Early Detection of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Women at Average Risk. ACOG Committee Opinion. SGO No.716, Nov 2017.

[2] Cree IA, White VA, Indave BI, Lokuhetty D. Revising the WHO classification: female genital tract tumours. Histopathology. 2020 Jan;76(1):151-156. doi: 10.1111/his.13977.

[3] Substrate curvature induces fallopian tube epithelial cell invasion via cell-cell tension in a model of ovarian cortical inclusion cysts. Fleszar AJ, Walker A, Kreeger PK, Notbohm J.Integr Biol (Camb). 2019.

[4] The Extracellular Matrix of Ovarian Cortical Inclusion Cysts Modulates Invasion of Fallopian Tube Epithelial Cells. Fleszar AJ et al. 2018.

[5] Observations on the origin of ovarian cortical inclusion cysts in women undergoing risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Park KJ et al. 2018.

[6] Two types of ovarian cortical inclusion cysts: proposed origin and possible role in ovarian serous carcinogenesis. Banet N, Kurman RJ.Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2015.

[7] Serous ovarian tumors. Diebold J.Pathologe. 2014.

[8] Overview of non-epithelial ovarian tumours: Incidence and survival in the Netherlands, 1989-2015. van der Hel OL, Timmermans M, van Altena AM, Kruitwagen RFPM, Slangen BFM, Sonke GS, van de Vijver KK, van der Aa MA.Eur J Cancer. 2019.

[9] Detailed overview on rare malignant ovarian tumors. Aust S et al.Bull Cancer. 2020.

[10] Ovarian sex-cord stromal tumours and small cell tumours: Pathological, genetic and management aspects. Boussios S, Moschetta M, Zarkavelis G, Papadaki A, Kefas A, Tatsi K.Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017.

[11] Clinicopathologic features, incidence, and survival trends of gynecologic neuroendocrine tumors: a SEER database analysis. Gibbs J, Mei S, Economos K, Lee YC, Kanis MJ.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019.

[12] Gynecology: textbook / ed. by V.G. Brusenko, G.M. Savelieva. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2013.

[13] C. Sourial, V. et al. Ovarian inguinal hernia: systematic review up to Feb 2018. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2020.

[14] Ovarian Cyst. Mobeen S, Apostol R.2020 Jul 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.

[15] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. Practice Bulletin No. 174: Evaluation and Management of Adnexal Masses. Obstet Gynecol. 2016.

[16] Savelieva G. M. et al. Gynecology. National Guidelines // Moscow: GEOTAR-Media. – 2020.

[17] Gerfanova E.V., Ashrafyan L.A., Antonova I.B., Aleshikova O.I., Ivashina S.V. Tumors of the female reproductive system. 2015.

[18] Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS., FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee. The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions.

[19] Sehemby M et al. Virilising ovarian tumors: a single-center experience. Endocr Connect. 2018 Dec;7(12):1362-1369.

[20] Guideline No. 404: Initial Investigation and Management of Benign Ovarian Masses. Wolfman W, Thurston J, Yeung G, Glanc P.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020.

[21] Diagnosis of Ovarian Torsion: Is It Time to Forget About Doppler? Grunau GL, Harris A, Buckley J, Todd NJ.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018.

[22] A review of ovary torsion. Huang C, Hong MK, Ding DC.Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2017 Jul-Sep;29(3):143-147.

[23] Ovarian Torsion. Guile SL, Mathai JK.2020 Nov 20. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021.

[24] Varras M Tsikini A Polyzos D et al. Uterine adnexal torsion: pathologic and gray-scale ultrasonographic findings. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2004.

[25] Clinical risk factors for ovarian torsion. Asfour V, Varma R, Menon P.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(7):721-5. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1004524. Epub 2015.

[26] Friedrich L., Meyer R., Levin G. Management of adnexal mass: A comparison of five national guidelines //European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. – 2021.

[27] A multicenter clinical trial validating the performance of HE4, CA125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm and risk of malignancy index Maria Lycke 1, Björg Kristjansdottir 2, Karin Sundfeldt 2Randomized Controlled Trial Gynecol Oncol. 2018.

[28]    Borderline ovarian tumors: Guidelines from the French national college of obstetricians and gynecologists (CNGOF). Bourdel N et al., Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021.

[29] Guideline No. 403: Initial Investigation and Management of Adnexal Masses. Salvador S, Scott S, Glanc P, Eiriksson L, Jang JH, Sebastianelli A, Dean E.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020.

[30] Comparison between Serum HE4 and CA125 as Tumor Markers in Premenopausal Women with Benign Pelvic Mass. Huang X, Wang Y, He X, Kang F, Luo L, Su Z, Ye H.Clin Lab. 2019.

[31] Comparison of CA125, HE4, and ROMA index for ovarian cancer diagnosis. Zhang L, Chen Y, Wang K.Curr Probl Cancer. 2019.

[32] Biomarkers and algorithms for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: CA125, HE4, RMI and ROMA, a review. Dochez V, Caillon H, Vaucel E, Dimet J, Winer N, Ducarme G.J Ovarian Res. 2019.

[33] HE4 in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses. Granato T, Porpora MG, Longo F, Angeloni A, Manganaro L, Anastasi E.Clin Chim Acta. 2015.

[34] Sagi-Dain L, Lavie O, Auslander R, et al. CA 19-9 in evaluation of adnexal mass: retrospective cohort analysis and review of the literature. Int J Biol Markers 2015.

[35] Sagi-Dain L, Lavie O, Auslander R, et al. CEA in evaluation of adnexal mass: retrospective cohort analysis and review of the literature. Int J Biol Markers 2015.

[36] Diagnosis and Management of Adnexal Masses. Biggs WS, Marks ST.Am Fam Physician. 2016.

[37] The Management of Ovarian Cysts in Postmenopausal Women. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 34, July 2016.

[38] Simple descriptors and simple rules of the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group: a prospective study of combined use for the description of adnexal masses. Peces Rama A, et al. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015.

[39] Andreotti R. F. et al. O-RADS US risk stratification and management system: a consensus guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee //Radiology. – 2020.

[40] Evaluation of adnexal tumours in the International Ovarian Tumor Analysissystem in reference to histopathological results. Nowak A, Soja M, Masternak M, Mokros Ł, Wilczyński J, Szubert M.Prz Menopauzalny. 2019.

[41] Retrospective analysis of transvaginal ultrasound-guided aspiration of simple ovarian cysts. Kostrzewa M, Zając A, Wilczyński JR, Stachowiak G.Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019. .

[42] Thomassin-Naggara I. et al. Ovarian-adnexal reporting data system magnetic resonance imaging (O-RADS MRI) score for risk stratification of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses. JAMA Netw Open. 2020.

[43] O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. Andreotti RF, Timmerman et al., Glanc P.Radiology. 2020.

[44] Sasaguri K. et al. External validation of ADNEX MR SCORING system: a single-centre retrospective study. Clin. Radiol. 2019.

[45] Sayasneh A Kaijser J Preisler J et al. A multicenter prospective external validation of the diagnostic performance of IOTA simple descriptors and rules to characterize ovarian masses. Gynecol Oncol. 2013.

[46] Grimes D.A., Jones L.B., Lopez L.M., Schulz K.F. Oral contraceptives for function ovarian cysts // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014.

[47] Naz T Akhter Z Jamal T Oral contraceptives versus expectant treatment in the management of functional ovarian cysts. J Med Sci. 2011.

[48] V.I. Kulakov, L.V. Adamyan. Endoscopy in Gynecology: A Guide for Physicians. – Moscow: Meditsina, 2000.

[49] Adamyan L. V. State of the reproductive system in patients with benign tumors of the internal genitalia and principles of reconstructive treatment: Diss. ... Doctor of Medical Sciences // Moscow. – 1985. Moscow.

[50] Jacobs IJ Menon U Ryan A et al. Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016.

[51] Greenlee RT Kessel B Williams CR et al. Prevalence, incidence, and natural history of simple ovarian cysts among women >55 years old in a large cancer screening trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010.

[52] Sharma A Apostolidou S Burnell M et al. Risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women with ultrasound-detected ovarian masses: a prospective cohort study within the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS). 2012.

[53] van Nagell JR Jr Miller RW DeSimone CP et al. Long-term survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer detected by ultrasonographic screening. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. .

[54] Buys SS Partridge E Black A et al.Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011.

[55] Guidelines for the Use of Laparoscopy for during Pregnancy. SAGES May 2017.

[56] Oral E. et al. Concomitant endometriosis in malignant and borderline ovarian tumours // Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. – 2018. – Vol. 38. – No. 8. – P. 1104-1109. .

[57] Martynov S.A., Surgical tactics in the treatment of pregnant women with tumor-like masses and ovarian tumors // Diss. Dr. Med. Sci. 2016.

[58] Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1130n dated October 20, 2020 "On approval of the Procedure for the provision of medical care in the profile of 'obstetrics and gynecology'".

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

Leyla V. Adamyan – Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director of the V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Honored Scientist of Russia, Head of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine at the Russian University of Medicine, Chief Freelance Gynecologist of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the Society for Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Russian Association of Gynecologic Endoscopists, Russian Association for Endometriosis, Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Alexandra V. Asaturova – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the 1st Pathological Anatomy Department at the V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Natalya V. Artymuk – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology named after Professor G.A. Ushakova at Kemerovo State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in obstetrics and gynecology of the Russian Ministry of Health in the Siberian Federal District, member of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Tatyana E. Belokrinitskaya – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Continuing Professional Education, Chita State Medical Academy of the Russian Ministry of Health, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Chief Freelance Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Russian Ministry of Health in the Far Eastern Federal District (Chita), member of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, President of the Trans-Baikal Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Vitaly F. Bezhenar – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology at the First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Chief Freelance Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynecology for the Health Committee of St. Petersburg, member of the Society for Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Russian Association of Gynecologic Endoscopists, Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Yulia E. Dobrohotova – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Faculty of Medicine of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Honored Physician of the RF, Honored Scientist of the RF, Laureate of the Government Prize of the RF, member of the Society for Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Russian Association of Gynecologic Endoscopists, Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Stanislav I. Kiselev – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery at the A.I. Yevdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Russian Ministry of Health, laureate of the Government Prize of the Russian Federation in Science and Technology, member of the Russian Association of Gynecologic Endoscopists, Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Anna I. Malyshkina – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Genetics at the Ivanovo State Medical Academy of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief Freelance Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Russian Ministry of Health in the Central Federal District, member of the Society for Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Irina A. Salnikova – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Researcher at the 2nd Gynecological Department of the V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

Narine M. Tonoyan – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Obstetrician-Gynecologist at the Department of Operative Gynecology of the V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.

Elena V. Uvarova – Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Head of the 2nd Gynecological Department at the V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology of the Institute of Professional Education at the I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University) of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Chief Freelance Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecologist of the Russian Ministry of Health, President of the Association of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecologists of Russia, member of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Filippov Oleg Semenovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Chief freelance Obstetrician-Gynecologist of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Deputy Director of the Federal Scientific and Clinical Center of Children and Adolescents of FMBA of Russia, Professor at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Russian University of Medicine.

Maria I. Yarmolinskaya – Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Endocrinology at the D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Conflict of interest:

All members of the working group declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience for these clinical guidelines:

  1. Obstetricians-gynecologists,

  2. Endocrinologists,

  3. Surgeons,

  4. Urologists,

  5. Oncologists,

  6. Family medicine physicians,

  7. Students, residents, PhD candidates, and faculty of medical universities.

Table 1. Level of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

Table 2. Scale for evaluating the levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis

2

Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

Table 3. Scale for evaluating the levels of recommendation certainty (LRC) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural healing factors (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitation interventions)

GoR

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.

The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

These clinical guidelines were developed taking into account the following regulatory legal documents:

  1. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1130n dated October 20, 2020 "On approval of the Procedure for the provision of medical care in the profile of 'obstetrics and gynecology'".

  2. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 803n dated July 31, 2020, "On the procedure for the use of assisted reproductive technologies, contraindications and restrictions on their use."

  3. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Association of Oncologists of Russia, 2014.

  4. Obstetrics. National Guidelines. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2015. - 1080 p.

  5. Savelieva G. M. et al. Gynecology: National Guidelines. Short edition / ed. by G.M. Savelieva, G.T. Sukhikh, V.N. Serov, V.E. Radzinsky, I.B. Manukhin. – 2nd ed., rev. and supp. – Moscow : GEOTAR-Media, 2020. – 1056 p. – DOI: 10.33029/9704-5739-9-GIN-2020-1-056.

  6. Clinical Gynecologic Oncology: in 3 vols. / ed. by F.J. DiSaia, W.T. Creasman; transl. from English ed. by E.G. Novikova. - Moscow: Prakticheskaya Meditsina, 2012. - Vol.3. - p.: ill.

  7. Guideline No. 404: Initial Investigation and Management of Benign Ovarian Masses. Wolfman W, Thurston J, Yeung G, Glanc P.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Aug;42(8):1040-1050.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.01.014.PMID: 32736855

  8. Guideline No. 403: Initial Investigation and Management of Adnexal Masses. Salvador S, Scott S, Glanc P, Eiriksson L, Jang JH, Sebastianelli A, Dean E.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Aug;42(8):1021-1029.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2019.08.044.PMID: 32736853

  9. The Management of Ovarian Cysts in Postmenopausal Women. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 34, July 2016.

  10. O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee. Andreotti RF, Timmerman D, Strachowski LM, Froyman W, Benacerraf BR, Bennett GL, Bourne T, Brown DL, Coleman BG, Frates MC, Goldstein SR, Hamper UM, Horrow MM, Hernanz-Schulman M, Reinhold C, Rose SL, Whitcomb BP, Wolfman WL, Glanc P.Radiology. 2020 Jan;294(1):168-185. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191150. Epub 2019 Nov 5.PMID: 3168792

  11. Grimes D.A., Jones L.B., Lopez L.M., Schulz K.F. Oral contraceptives for function ovarian cysts // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014/ Vol. 4/ CD006134.

  12. V.I. Kulakov, L.V. Adamyan. Endoscopy in Gynecology: A Guide for Physicians. – Moscow: Meditsina, 2000. – 384 p.: ill.

  13. Serov V. N., Sukhikh G. T. Clinical Guidelines. Obstetrics and Gynecology // M: GEOTAR-Media. – 4th ed. – 2017. Moscow: Problemy Reproduktsii.

Appendix A3.1 Histological classification of ovarian tumors (WHO, 2020).

a. Epithelial tumors

1.2. Serous tumors

Benign:

serous cystadenoma

serous cystadenofibroma

serous surface papilloma

Borderline:

serous borderline tumor

serous borderline tumor – micropapillary variant

Malignant:

high-grade serous carcinoma

low-grade serous carcinoma

1.2. Mucinous tumors

Benign:

mucinous cystadenoma

mucinous adenofibroma

Borderline:

mucinous borderline tumor

Malignant:

mucinous carcinoma

1.3. Endometrioid tumors

Benign:

endometrioid cystadenoma

endometrioid adenofibroma

Borderline:

endometrioid borderline tumor

Malignant:

endometrioid carcinoma

seromucinous carcinoma

1.4. Clear cell tumors

Benign:

clear cell cystadenoma

clear cell adenofibroma

Borderline:

clear cell borderline tumor

Malignant:

clear cell carcinoma

1.5. Brenner tumors

Benign:

Brenner tumor

Borderline:

borderline Brenner tumor

Malignant:

malignant Brenner tumor

1.6. Seromucinous tumors

Benign:

seromucinous cystadenoma

seromucinous cystadenofibroma

Borderline:

seromucinous borderline tumor

1.7. Other carcinomas

mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma

undifferentiated carcinoma

dedifferentiated carcinoma

carcinosarcoma

mixed-cell carcinoma

1.8 Mesenchymal tumors

low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

leiomyoma

leiomyosarcoma

smooth muscle tumor of uncertain malignant potential

myxoma

2.1. Mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumors

adenosarcoma

3. Sex cord-stromal tumors

3.1. Stromal and sex cord-stromal tumors

fibroma

cellular fibroma

thecoma

luteinized thecoma

sclerosing stromal tumor

signet-ring stromal tumor

microcystic stromal tumor

Leydig cell tumor

steroid cell tumor

malignant steroid cell tumor

fibrosarcoma

3.2. Sex cord-stromal tumors

adult granulosa cell tumor

juvenile granulosa cell tumor

Sertoli cell tumor

sex cord tumor with annular tubules

3.3. Mixed sex cord-stromal tumors

Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors

well-differentiated

moderately differentiated

poorly differentiated

unclassified sex cord-stromal tumors

Gynandroblastoma

4. Germ cell tumors

benign teratoma

immature teratoma

dysgerminoma

yolk sac tumor

embryonal carcinoma

choriocarcinoma

mixed germ cell tumor

5. Monodermal teratomas and somatic tumors arising from dermoid cysts

Struma ovarii, benign

Struma ovarii, malignant

Strumal carcinoid

Teratoma with malignant transformation

6. Gonadal stromal-germ cell mixed tumors

gonadoblastoma

mixed germ cell-sex cord-stromal tumor, unclassified

7. Miscellaneous tumors

ovarian rete adenoma

ovarian rete adenocarcinoma

wolffian tumor

small cell carcinoma, hypercalcemic type

small cell carcinoma, hypercalcemic type, large cell variant

Wilms tumor

solid pseudopapillary neoplasm

8. Tumor-like lesions

follicular cyst

corpus luteum cyst

large solitary luteinized follicular cyst

hyperreactio luteinalis

pregnancy luteoma

stromal hyperplasia and hyperthecosis

fibromatosis and massive edema

Leydig cell hyperplasia

other

9. Metastatic tumors

Simple Rules ultrasound classification of benign and malignant tumors (IOTA Group)

Ultrasonic features of benign tumors

Ultrasonic features of malignant tumors

Unilocular cyst

Solid components

Maximum diameter of the largest solid component <7 mm

Ascites

Acoustic shadows

Four or more papillary structures

Smooth multilocular tumor with largest diameter <100 mm

Multilocular tumor with irregular solid components with largest diameter >= 100 mm

No blood flow on color Doppler

Very strong blood flow on color Doppler

O-RADS US Risk Stratification and Management System: A Consensus Guideline from the ACR Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System Committee.

Andreotti RF, Timmerman D, Strachowski LM, Froyman W, Benacerraf BR, Bennett GL, Bourne T, Brown DL, Coleman BG, Frates MC, Goldstein SR, Hamper UM, Horrow MM, Hernanz-Schulman M, Reinhold C, Rose SL, Whitcomb BP, Wolfman WL, Glanc P.Radiology. 2020 Jan;294(1):168-185. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191150. Epub 2019 Nov 5.PMID: 31687921

O-RADS Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System

O-RADS

Risk level

malignant transformation

Risk of malignancy (IOTA)

Features

Management in premenopause

Management in postmenopause

0

Inadequate data

Undetermined

Repeat or alternative scan

1

Normal ovary

Undetermined

Simple cyst-like follicle <3 cm

Not required

Undetermined

Corpus luteum <3 cm

2

Almost certainly benign

<1%

Simple cyst <3 cm

Undetermined

Not required

Simple cyst 3-5 cm

Not required

1-year follow-up*

Simple cyst >5 - <10 cm

8–12 week follow-up (scan during the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle)

Non-"simple" cyst, unilocular, smooth-walled <3 cm

Not required

Non-"simple" cyst, unilocular >3 - <10 cm

8–12 week follow-up (scan during the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle)

Determined by the clinician (not an oncologist)

Typical hemorrhagic cyst

<5 cm – not required

>5 - <10 cm – 8–12 week follow-up; if growing, management is determined by the clinician

*1-year follow-up; if no growth or reduction in size – annual examinations for 5 years

Typical dermoid cyst <10 cm

8–12 week follow-up to clarify the diagnosis. Then surgical treatment or follow-up*

Typical endometrioid cyst <10 cm

Determined by the clinician (not an oncologist)

Simple paraovarian cyst**

Typical peritoneal cyst**

**any size

Typical hydrosalpinx**

3

Low risk

1 - <10%

Unilocular simple or non-simple cyst >10 mm

Determined by the clinician (not an oncologist)

"Typical" dermoid, endometrioid, hemorrhagic cyst >10 mm

Unilocular cyst with irregular inner contour <3 mm in height

Multilocular cyst <10 cm, with smooth inner contour, vascularity 1-3

Solid mass with smooth contour, vascularity 1

4

Moderate risk

10 - <50%

Multilocular cyst >10 cm, with smooth inner contour, vascularity 1-3

Determined by an oncogynecologist

Multilocular cyst with smooth inner contour, vascularity 4

Multilocular cyst with irregular inner contour and/or irregular septa

Unilocular cyst with solid component, without papillary projections*

*According to the IOTA and O-RADS lexicons, a solid component and a papillary projection are the same thing

Unilocular cyst with 1-3 papillary projections

Determined by an oncogynecologist

Multilocular cyst with solid component, vascularity 1-2

Solid mass with smooth contour, vascularity 2-3

5

High risk

>50%

Unilocular cyst with >4 papillary projections*

Determined by an oncogynecologist

Multilocular cyst with solid component*, vascularity 3-4

Solid mass with smooth contour, vascularity 4

Solid mass with irregular contour

Ascites and/or peritoneal solid inclusions (ascites combined with O-RADS 1-2 can be of either malignant or benign etiology)

*According to the IOTA and O-RADS lexicons, a solid component and a papillary projection are the same thing

Risk of Malignancy Index for pelvic masses (RMI by Jacobs et al., 1990)

Sign

Scoring system

Example

Menopausal status

Premenopause

1 point

Postmenopause

3 points

3

Ultrasound findings

Multilocular

None of the features = 0 points

1 feature = 1 point

2 - 5 features = 3 points

1 + 1 + 1 = 3

Solid component

Bilateral

Ascites

Metastases

CA 125

Absolute value

90

RMI = (Ultrasound findings) * (menopausal status) * CA-125

3 * 3 * 90 = 810

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms — Benign Ovarian Neoplasms

Appendix C. Patient Information

  • Benign ovarian tumors occur at any age and are characterized by an asymptomatic course, which makes the annual gynecological examination and annual pelvic ultrasound particularly valuable.

  • Effective screening for early ovarian cancer is currently unavailable.

  • Lower abdominal and back pain, abdominal enlargement, fatigue, and weight loss are late symptoms of ovarian cancer.

  • In 99.0% of cases, ovarian tumors do not cause menstrual irregularities.

  • The occurrence of complications – adnexal torsion, perforation of the ovarian mass wall, ovarian apoplexy ("acute abdomen") – is an indication for emergency admission to a gynecological inpatient unit.

  • More than 50% of cystic adnexal masses in menstruating women are functional, i.e., capable of spontaneous regression. Confirmation of the functional nature of an ovarian cystic mass is performed via repeat ultrasound 4–6 weeks after the initial scan.

  • In postmenopausal women, the detection of an ovarian cystic mass is a tumor (benign or malignant) in the vast majority of cases. A definitive conclusion regarding the nature of the process can only be made after tumor removal, i.e., surgical treatment.

  • When visiting a gynecologist, it is essential to provide detailed information about ALL relatives who suffered from malignant tumors of any localization on both the maternal and paternal sides, specifically noting breast, ovarian, endometrial, colorectal, and gastric cancers.

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Not applicable.

If you practice in the specialty of obstetrics and gynecology

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer using the clinical guidelines for "Benign Ovarian Neoplasms" and other current Russian Ministry of Health guidelines, citing specific sections rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines