List of Abbreviations
MRI – magnetic resonance imaging
GR – grade of recommendation
LE – level of evidence
US – ultrasound examination
CDU – color duplex ultrasonography
Terms and Definitions
Isolated hydrocele is an excessive accumulation of serous fluid between the parietal and visceral layers of the tunica vaginalis of the scrotum with an obliterated processus vaginalis.
Communicating hydrocele is an excessive accumulation of serous fluid between the parietal and visceral layers of the tunica vaginalis of the scrotum with an unoblittered processus vaginalis.
Tense hydrocele is an excessive accumulation of serous fluid between the parietal and visceral layers of the tunica vaginalis of the scrotum, leading to increased pressure in its cavity. It is accompanied by tension of the scrotal membranes and may cause pain.
Infected hydrocele (pyocele) is accompanied by bacterial infection of the scrotal cavity.
Epididymal cyst is a benign cystic lesion of the epididymis filled with serous fluid.
Spermatocele is an epididymal cyst containing spermatozoa.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Hydrocele is an excessive accumulation of fluid between the parietal and visceral layers of the tunica vaginalis of the scrotum.
Funicular hydrocele (cyst of the spermatic cord) is an accumulation of fluid along the spermatic cord when the processus vaginalis remains unoblittered at that level [1].
Epididymal cyst is a benign cystic lesion of the epididymis filled with serous fluid.
Spermatocele is an epididymal cyst containing spermatozoa.
In practice, these two terms are interchangeable, as they can only be reliably differentiated by analyzing the contents of the cyst [2].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Hydrocele
The anatomical prerequisite for congenital hydrocele is the failure of the processus vaginalis to close [3]. Incomplete obliteration results in a communicating hydrocele. If obliteration occurs at the level of the internal inguinal ring and fluid accumulates in the scrotal cavity, a non-communicating hydrocele develops. Residual unoblittered cavities at the level of the spermatic cord can lead to funicular hydrocele [4].
Acquired hydrocele may be due to pathological production of effusion into the serous cavity of the scrotum.
Predisposing factors for acquired hydrocele may include:
- inflammatory process,
- scrotal trauma,
- history of surgical interventions on the scrotal organs and inguinal region (varicocelectomy, inguinal herniorrhaphy),
- neoplasms,
- filariasis.
Isolated hydrocele occurs predominantly in adolescents and is associated with trauma, orchiepididymitis, or prior ligation of the testicular veins for varicocele [5]. The etiology of hydrocele cannot always be determined, in which case an idiopathic nature of the condition is assumed [6].
Spermatocele
The etiology of spermatocele is not reliably known. The cyst may develop due to obstruction in the epididymal efferent ductules following an inflammatory process or trauma, with their subsequent dilation [7].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
Hydrocele
There are no reliable data on the prevalence of the disease in children.
In ultrasound examinations of children aged 8 to 36 months, the detection rate of hydrocele is 2.8% [8]. During routine preventive examinations of children and adolescents, the detection rate of hydrocele reaches 0.96% [9].
Spermatocele
According to literature data, the incidence of epididymal cyst in children ranges from 5 to 20%, increasing in adolescents [10].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
N43.0 – Encysted hydrocele
N43.1 – Infected hydrocele (an additional code B95-B98 may be used to specify the infectious agent)
N43.2 – Other forms of hydrocele
N43.3 – Hydrocele, unspecified
N43.4 – Spermatocele
P83.5 – Congenital hydrocele
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
Hydrocele
There is no universally accepted classification of hydrocele and spermatocele. Based on a generalized analysis of the literature, it seems appropriate to distinguish the following gradations of hydrocele:
1. By genesis:
- congenital
- acquired
A. primary (idiopathic)
B. secondary (symptomatic)
2. Presence of communication with the abdominal cavity
- isolated
- communicating
3. Course of the disease
- acute
- chronic
4. Complications
- tense
- infected (pyocele)
5. Location
- unilateral
- bilateral [4,11,12,13].
Spermatocele
There is no universally accepted classification of spermatocele. Based on a generalized analysis of the literature, it seems appropriate to distinguish the following gradations of spermatocele:
1. Location
- unilateral
- bilateral
2. By number
- single
- multiple
3. Complications
- infected
- tense
- cyst torsion [14].
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
Hydrocele
Enlargement of one or both sides of the scrotum is noted (in bilateral cases). Palpation is painless; the scrotum has a soft-elastic consistency. The testis can be palpated only when the hydrocele volume is small. In funiculocele, an elastic formation is palpated along the spermatic cord. With a large cyst volume, it may extend to the scrotal part of the spermatic cord and resemble a hydrocele, with the testis being palpable separately from the cyst.
In communicating hydrocele, the fluid volume can change, increasing with prolonged upright posture of the patient.
Infected hydrocele is accompanied by hyperemia and edema of the scrotum and is painful upon palpation [4,6,15,16].
Spermatocele
The epididymal cyst is usually asymptomatic. Palpation may reveal a rounded, elastic, painless mass in the projection of the epididymis, most commonly in the region of the epididymal head. In rare cases of epididymal cyst torsion, the clinical picture may include the following symptoms: edema, scrotal hyperemia, and pain in the epididymis region. Tenderness may be noted in tense spermatocele. Upon infection, an inflammatory process develops, mimicking the presentation of the "acute scrotum syndrome" [14,17].
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
Criteria for diagnosis establishment: the diagnosis is established based on the patient's history, complaints, results of physical examination, and instrumental examination data.
Hydrocele
Patients may present with complaints of enlargement of one half of the scrotum; a significant hydrocele volume can lead to stretching of the membranes and skin of the scrotum, resulting in pain syndrome. In spermatic cord cysts, complaints may include a visible or palpable mass along the spermatic cord. In infected hydrocele, hyperemia and edema of the scrotum, as well as pain syndrome, are noted.
Complaints in secondary hydrocele will correspond to the underlying disease.
It is recommended to ascertain from the patient or parents:
- the duration of symptom onset,
- changes in the volume of the mass during the day,
- the presence of pain syndrome in the scrotum and inguinal region,
- past diseases and surgical interventions on the scrotal organs and inguinal canal [6].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Spermatocele
It is recommended to ascertain from the patient whether they have complaints of:
- a palpable mass in the scrotum,
- the presence of pain syndrome in the area of the mass,
- the duration of the onset of these complaints [2].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: patients with an epididymal cyst typically do not present with complaints, and the condition is frequently discovered during examination for other pathology of the scrotal organs. In rare cases of epididymal cyst torsion, the complaints will be characteristic of the acute scrotum syndrome [2].
2.2 Physical Examination
Hydrocele
It is recommended that in case of suspected hydrocele, an examination and palpation of the male genitalia (Palpation in male genital pathology) be performed to assess their symmetry and the presence of fluid between the layers of the tunica vaginalis [6,11].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that in case of suspected spermatic cord cyst, palpation of the inguinal region and spermatic cord (Palpation in male genital pathology) be performed [6,11].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: with a sufficient accumulation of fluid, palpation of the testis may be difficult. Secondary hydrocele will be accompanied by symptoms of the underlying condition (orchitis, epididymitis, testicular torsion).
Spermatocele
It is recommended that in case of suspected epididymal cyst, palpation of the male genitalia (Palpation in male genital pathology) be performed [2].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: an epididymal cyst is most commonly located in the region of the epididymal head as a rounded, painless mass.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
There are no specific laboratory tests for diagnosing the disease. In secondary hydrocele associated with inflammatory diseases of the scrotal organs, an increase in leukocyte count may be observed [18].
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
Hydrocele
It is recommended to perform a scrotal ultrasound in all patients with suspected hydrocele or funiculocele [1,11].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: when performing a scrotal ultrasound, it is necessary to assess the amount of fluid, its characteristics, and the presence of communication with the abdominal cavity. It is also necessary to rule out an inguinal hernia. In secondary hydrocele, diagnosis of the underlying condition is performed [1,11].
Spermatocele
It is recommended to perform a scrotal ultrasound in all patients with suspected epididymal cyst [2,19].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: scrotal ultrasound is the primary instrumental diagnostic method for an epididymal cyst. It evaluates the structure of the testis and epididymis, the size of the cyst, and its location [2,19].
2.5 Other Procedures
It is recommended to perform magnetic resonance imaging of the scrotum in cases of diagnostic difficulties, significant hydrocele volumes, or extension of the hydrocele into the retroperitoneal space (abdominoscrotal hydrocele) [20-23].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform color Doppler ultrasound of the spermatic cord vessels in cases of tense hydrocele or pain syndrome to rule out testicular ischemia [20-23].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
3.1 Conservative Treatment
Hydrocele
Observation of acquired non-tense hydrocele, including a follow-up consultation (examination, consultation) by a pediatric urologist-andrologist, is recommended for 12 months [24,25].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: surgical treatment of congenital hydrocele before the age of 12 months may be performed in cases of combination with an inguinal hernia, or in tense or infected hydrocele.
Spermatocele
When an asymptomatic epididymal cyst is detected, observation is recommended — including a follow-up consultation (examination, consultation) by a pediatric urologist-andrologist for 12 months in order to assess the size of the spermatocele in the absence of active growth [19].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: in a number of cases, involution of the epididymal cyst is possible [26].
3.2 Surgical Treatment
Hydrocele
It is recommended to perform surgical treatment for communicating hydrocele after 1 year of age in the absence of complications (optimally at 1-3 years of age) [27].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: the main principle of surgical treatment for communicating hydrocele is ligation of the processus vaginalis at the level of the internal inguinal ring via an inguinal canal approach (Ross procedure) or a laparoscopic approach. For non-communicating hydrocele, excision of the tunica vaginalis is performed.
It is recommended to perform surgical treatment in the following cases:
- progressive increase in hydrocele volume during the observation period,
- concomitant inguinal/inguinoscrotal hernia or other non-acute pathology of the testis on the affected side,
- visible asymmetry of the scrotum,
- abdominoscrotal form of hydrocele [16,28,29,30].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to use a laparoscopic or inguinal approach for the surgical treatment of communicating hydrocele [31,32].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: currently, there is no convincing evidence of the superiority of laparoscopic versus inguinal approaches for communicating hydrocele; due to comparable outcomes, both methods can be used with equal efficacy [31,32].
Laparoscopic closure of the processus vaginalis of the peritoneum and video-assisted ligation of the processus vaginalis of the peritoneum may be used in cases of communicating hydrocele combined with an inguinal hernia, bilateral communicating hydrocele, or communicating hydrocele combined with a contralateral inguinal hernia [32,33,34].
It is recommended to perform surgical treatment in cases of complicated hydrocele (tense, infected) regardless of age [16].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended that surgery for non-communicating hydrocele be performed in the presence of pain syndrome, patient discomfort, or signs of testicular ischemia according to Doppler ultrasound data [24,27,35].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: as a rule, the presence of these complaints and symptoms corresponds to a hydrocele volume of at least 40-50 milliliters in an adolescent.
It is recommended that upon initial detection of uncomplicated non-communicating hydrocele, observation be carried out for 6 months, including a follow-up consultation (examination, consultation) by a pediatric urologist-andrologist [5,24,27].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: currently, the main techniques used for non-communicating hydrocele are: Bergman, Winkelmann, and Lord procedures. In the Winkelmann procedure, the tunica vaginalis is everted and sutured behind the epididymis. The Bergman procedure involves the excision of a portion of the tunica vaginalis and is preferred for large-volume hydroceles. The Lord procedure involves plication of the tunica vaginalis using sutures [5,13,36].
It is recommended that in cases of recurrence of either communicating or non-communicating hydrocele, observation be maintained for 6 months, including a follow-up consultation (examination, consultation) by a pediatric urologist-andrologist [4].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that for recurrence of communicating hydrocele after laparoscopic closure of the processus vaginalis, surgical treatment be performed via an inguinal approach. For recurrence of communicating hydrocele after hydrocelectomy via an inguinal approach, laparoscopic closure of the processus vaginalis is recommended. Indications for reoperation in recurrent hydrocele are determined in the same manner as for the primary intervention [31,32,34].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
It is recommended that in cases of recurrent isolated hydrocele, meticulous excision of the tunica vaginalis be performed to prevent recurrence [4].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Following hydrocele excision, regardless of its form, the following complications are possible:
- hematoma,
- local infection of the postoperative wound,
- injury to spermatic cord elements,
- iatrogenic cryptorchidism,
- injury to the inferior epigastric or external iliac vessels [31,36].
It is recommended to evaluate the absence of postoperative complications during the hospitalization period [31,36].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Spermatocele
It is recommended to perform surgical treatment for an epididymal cyst in the presence of:
- pain syndrome,
- cyst size greater than 10 mm and its continued growth,
- torsion of the epididymal cyst,
- infection of the cyst,
- tense cyst [2,37,38].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform excision of the epididymal cyst using precision techniques and avoiding trauma to surrounding tissues [2].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: the epididymal defect after cyst removal is closed with interrupted sutures [2].
Sclerotherapy is not used for spermatoceles in children as there is no evidence regarding its efficacy and safety [2,14].
Following excision of an epididymal cyst, the following complications are possible:
- scrotal hematoma,
- local infection of the postoperative wound.
It is recommended to evaluate the presence of postoperative complications during the hospitalization period [2].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
3.N Other treatment
Not applicable.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
Specific rehabilitation methods are not indicated.
Sanatorium-resort treatment is not indicated.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
Hydrocele
It is recommended that if a hydrocele is detected in the first year of life, observation be continued until the age of 1 year, including a follow-up consultation (examination, consultation) by a pediatric urologist-andrologist. If a secondary hydrocele is detected, patient observation for 12 months with scrotal ultrasound is recommended [4,24].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended that the patient be observed for one year after surgery, with follow-up consultations (examination, consultation) by a pediatric urologist-andrologist at 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year, and a scrotal ultrasound performed if recurrence or a complication is suspected. Further follow-up is indicated if complications develop [31].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Spermatocele
It is recommended to observe patients with newly diagnosed asymptomatic spermatocele, including an initial evaluation (examination and consultation) by a pediatric urologist-andrologist for 12 months in the absence of active growth, supplemented by scrotal ultrasound. Following surgical treatment, a follow-up evaluation (examination and consultation) by a pediatric urologist-andrologist is recommended at 1 month and 1 year [14,19].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
6. Organization of Medical Care
Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization:
1) Elective hospitalization: for surgical treatment;
2) Emergency hospitalization: in case of complications or pain syndrome.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:
1) Patient discharge is possible on days 1–7 after surgical treatment if the patient's condition is satisfactory, with no signs of surgical site infection, hyperthermia, or testicular ischemia;
2) Patients may be discharged from the hospital with subsequent outpatient follow-up according to the recommendations.
7. Additional Information
Not applicable.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

References
Show references
Patil, V., Shetty, S. M., & Das, S. (2015). Common and Uncommon Presentation of Fluid within the Scrotal Spaces. Ultrasound international open, 1(2), E34–E40. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1555919
Boscarelli A, Bellini T. Epididymal cyst in children. Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180(9):2723-2729. doi:10.1007/s00431-021-04080-5
Brainwood, M., Beirne, G., & Fenech, M. (2020). Persistence of the processus vaginalis and its related disorders. Australasian journal of ultrasound in medicine, 23(1), 22–29.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.12195
Patoulias I, Koutsogiannis E, Panopoulos I, Michou P, Feidantsis T, Patoulias D. Hydrocele in Pediatric Population. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2020;63(2):57-62. doi:10.14712/18059694.2020.17
Koutsoumis, G., Patoulias, I., & Kaselas, C. (2014). Primary new-onset hydroceles presenting in late childhood and pre-adolescent patients resemble the adult type hydrocele pathology. Journal of pediatric surgery, 49(11), 1656–1658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.05.020
Cimador, M., Castagnetti, M., & De Grazia, E. (2010). Management of hydrocele in adolescent patients. Naturereviews. Urology, 7(7), 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2010.80
O'Kelly F, McAlpine K, Abdeen N, Keays MA, Guerra LA, Leonard MP. The futility of continued surveillance of epididymal cysts - A study of the prevalence and clinico-demographics in pre- vs. post-pubertal boys. Can Urol Assoc J. 2019;13(12):E398-E403. doi:10.5489/cuaj.5667
Jedrzejewski, G., Wozniak, M. M., Madej, T., Kryza, R., Zielonka-Lamparska, E., & Wieczorek, A. P. (2012). The differences in testicular volumes in boys 8-36 months old with undescended, retractile and hydrocele testis--usefulness of scrotal screening ultrasound. Early human development, 88(3), 185–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.07.023.
Gres AA, Shmygira MB. Urological diseases in boys and adolescents during targeted preventive examinations. Urologiya i nefrologiya. 1992;(4-6):40-41. (In Russ.)
Messina M., Fusi G., Ferrara F., Bindi E., Pellegrino C., Molinaro F., Angotti R.: A rare cause of acute scrotum in a child: torsion of an epididymal cyst. Case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Med Chir. 2019 Jun 21; 41 (1). doi: 10.4081/pmc.2019.210
Rafailidis V, Varelas S, Apostolopoulou F, Rafailidis D. Nonobliteration of the Processus Vaginalis: Sonography of Related Abnormalities in Children. J Ultrasound Med. 2016;35(4):805-818. doi:10.7863/ultra.15.04060
Sagar, J., Kumar, S., Mondal, D., & Shah, D. K. (2006). Idiopathic infected hydrocele in a toddler: a case report with review. TheScientificWorldJournal, 6, 2396–2398.https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.371
Kadyrov ZA, Shikhov SD. Review of treatment methods for hydrocele. Andrologiya i genital'naya khirurgiya. 2013;14(3):6-11. (In Russ.)
Bleve C, Conighi ML, Bucci V, Costa L, Chiarenza SF. Torsion of huge epididymal cyst in a 16-year-old boy: case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Med Chir. 2018;40(1):10.4081/pmc.2018.162. Published 2018 May 29. doi:10.4081/pmc.2018.162
Terentiev, V., Dickman, E., Zerzan, J., & Arroyo, A. (2015). Idiopathic infant pyocele: a case report and review of the literature. The Journal of emergency medicine, 48(4), e93–e96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.07.038
Chang, Y. T., Lee, J. Y., Wang, J. Y., Chiou, C. S., & Chang, C. C. (2010). Hydrocele of the spermatic cord in infants and children: its particular characteristics. Urology, 76(1), 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.062
Messina M, Fusi G, Ferrara F, et al. A rare cause of acute scrotum in a child: torsion of an epididymal cyst. Case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Med Chir. 2019;41(1):10.4081/pmc.2019.210. Published 2019 Jun 21. doi:10.4081/pmc.2019.210
Trojian, T. H., Lishnak, T. S., & Heiman, D. (2009). Epididymitis and orchitis: an overview. American family physician, 79(7), 583–587
Niedzielski J, Miodek M, Krakós M. Epididymal cysts in childhood - conservative or surgical approach? PolPrzeglChir. 2012;84(8):406-410. doi:10.2478/v10035-012-0068-2
Schlup, S., Hanquinet, S., Dumont, M., Jéquier, S., & Bugmann, P. (2002). MRI and MRA of a giant hydrocoele in an infant. Pediatric radiology, 32(12), 885–887. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-002-0767-7
Gulum, M., Cece, H., Yeni, E., Savas, M., Ciftci, H., Karakas, E., Celik, H., & Yagmur, I. (2012). Diffusion-weighted MRI of the testis in hydrocele: a pilot study. Urologia internationalis, 89(2), 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1159/000339132
Kadyrov Z. A., Ishonakov K. S., Matar A. A. [Capabilities of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of hydrocele]. Andrologiya i genitalnaya khirurgiya. 2006;7(2):40-45. (In Russ.)
Churayants V. V., Kovalev V. A., Koroleva S. V. [Magnetic resonance imaging in scrotal diseases]. Meditsinskaya vizualizatsiya. 2006;(1):90-97. (In Russ.)
Acer-Demir, T., Ekenci, B. Y., Özer, D., Turanoğlu, M. A., Haberal, K. C., Bilgin, E. B., & Hiçsönmez, A. (2018). Natural History and Conservative Treatment Outcomes for Hydroceles: A Retrospective Review of One Center's Experience. Urology, 112, 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.10.003
Christensen, T., et al. New onset of hydroceles in boys over 1 year of age. Int J Urol, 2006. 13: 1425. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17083397
Fernández-Ibieta M, Villalon-Ferrero F, Ramos-García JL. Benign Scrotal Tumor in a Pediatric Patient: Epididymal Cyst. Case Rep Urol. 2018; 2018:1635635. Published 2018 Jun 20. doi:10.1155/2018/1635635
Wilson, J. M., Aaronson, D. S., Schrader, R., & Baskin, L. S. (2008). Hydrocele in the pediatric patient: inguinal or scrotal approach? The Journal of urology, 180(4 Suppl), 1724–1728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.111
Gadelkareem R.A. (2018) Abdominoscrotal hydrocele: A systematic review and proposed clinical grading. African Journal of Urology. 24(2):83-92 DOI:10.1016/j.afju.2018.01.00
International Pediatric Endosurgery Group. IPEG Guidelines for Inguinal Hernia and Hydrocele. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(2):x-xiv. doi:10.1089/lap.2010.9998
Nikulenkov AB, Rakevich MV, Nasyr RV, Razzamakina PK, Degtyarev YuG. Abdominoscrotal hydrocele: surgical tactics in children. Medical Journal. 2024;(2):108-113. https://doi.org/10.51922/1818-426X.2024.2.108
Pogorelić Z, Stanić P, Bašković M. Comparison of Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) versus Open Ligation of the Patent Processus Vaginalis for the Treatment of Communicating Pediatric Hydrocele. Children (Basel). 2024;11(4):437. Published 2024 Apr 5. doi:10.3390/children11040437
Esposito, C., Escolino, M., Turrà, F., Roberti, A., Cerulo, M., Farina, A., Caiazzo, S., Cortese, G., Servillo, G., & Settimi, A. (2016). Current concepts in the management of inguinal hernia and hydrocele in pediatric patients in laparoscopic era. Seminars in pediatric surgery, 25(4), 232–240. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2016.05.006
Kogan MI, Sizonov VV, Makarov AG. Comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical approaches in the treatment of the patent processus vaginalis. Urology Herald. 2016;(3):28-40. doi:10.21886/2308-6424-2016-0-3-28-40
Elhaddad A, Awad M, Shehata SM, Shehata MA. Laparoscopic management of infantile hydrocele in pediatric age group. Pediatr Surg Int. 2022;38(4):581-587. doi:10.1007/s00383-022-05064-8
Naji H, Ingolfsson I, Isacson D, Svensson JF. Decision making in the management of hydroceles in infants and children. Eur J Pediatr. 2012;171(5):807-810. doi:10.1007/s00431-011-1628-x
Tsai, L., Milburn, P. A., Cecil, C. L., 4th, Lowry, P. S., & Hermans, M. R. (2019). Comparison of Recurrence and Postoperative Complications Between 3 Different Techniques for Surgical Repair of Idiopathic Hydrocele. Urology, 125, 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.004
Cai W, Liu C, Xu L, Wu Q, Kuang T, Lin X. Epididymal cysts in children: frequency, clinical characteristics, and management strategies. Front Pediatr. 2024;12:1455866. doi:10.3389/fped.2024.1455866
Niedzielski J, Miodek M, Krakós M. Epididymal cysts in childhood - conservative or surgical approach?. Pol Przegl Chir. 2012;84(8):406-410. doi:10.2478/v10035-012-0068-2
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Kozyrev German Vladimirovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor at the Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology-Andrology named after L.P. Alexandrov, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health (Sechenov University), Director of the Association of Pediatric Urologists-Andrologists (APUA).
Shchedrov Dmitry Nikolaevich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Associate Professor at the Department of Urology with Nephrology, Yaroslavl State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the Department of Pediatric Uroandrology, Regional Children's Clinical Hospital, Yaroslavl.
Garova Daria Yuryevna – Ph.D. in Medicine, pediatric urologist-andrologist, Central City Hospital, Yaroslavl.
Kharchilava Revaz Revazovich – Ph.D. in Medicine, Director of the Praxi Medica Medical Training Center, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow.
Conflict of interest: none.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
Pediatric urologists-andrologists
Pediatric surgeons
Pediatricians
Table 1. Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Scale for assessing the levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Scale for assessing the grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.
The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
No information available.
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix C. Patient Information
Hydrocele is a pathological accumulation of serous fluid between the parietal and visceral layers of the tunica vaginalis of the testis. This condition can be congenital or acquired. Funicocele (spermatic cord cyst) occurs when an excessive accumulation of serous fluid is located along the spermatic cord.
Congenital hydrocele is caused by the persistence of communication between the scrotal cavity, inguinal canal, and peritoneal cavity. It is diagnosed in 1–2% of newborns. It can be unilateral or bilateral. There is an enlargement of one or both sides of the scrotum. Palpation is painless, and the scrotum has a soft-elastic consistency. The volume of fluid can vary, increasing after prolonged upright posture. In funicocele, an elastic mass is palpable along the spermatic cord.
The condition requires monitoring by a pediatric urologist-andrologist. In most cases, congenital hydrocele resolves spontaneously during the first year of life and requires only dynamic observation. Surgical intervention may be required in the following cases:
- infection of the hydrocele,
- tense hydrocele leading to elevated pressure within the scrotal cavity,
- progressive increase in fluid volume during the observation period,
- combination with an inguinal hernia,
- combination with other scrotal pathologies on the affected side.
Acquired hydrocele occurs predominantly in adolescents. Causes may include previous inflammatory diseases of the scrotal organs, trauma, previous surgeries on the scrotal organs and inguinal canal, or the cause may remain idiopathic. Initial presentation requires monitoring by a pediatric urologist-andrologist for 6–12 months and scrotal ultrasound. Surgery is indicated in the presence of pain or discomfort caused by enlargement of one half of the scrotum. Following surgery and hospital discharge, outpatient follow-up by a pediatric urologist-andrologist is indicated.
Spermatocoele (epididymal cyst) is a benign fluid-filled lesion of the epididymis. It is usually asymptomatic and most often detected during evaluation for other scrotal conditions or during a routine health check. When diagnosed, monitoring by a pediatric urologist-andrologist and scrotal ultrasound are indicated. Spontaneous involution of the cyst over time is possible. If the cyst is large, actively growing, painful, infected, or undergoes torsion, surgical treatment involving excision of the lesion is necessary.
Following surgery and hospital discharge, outpatient follow-up by a pediatric urologist-andrologist is indicated.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Not applicable.