Fractures and Nonunions of the Carpal Bones: Clinical Guidelines

Applies toadults, children2025 editionS62, S63.0, S63.1, T92.2

Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults, children. 2025 edition, ICD-10 codes: S62, S63.0, S63.1, T92.2. This page features an abridged version by WhiteCoat Pro and the full official text.

Receive research articles on "Fractures and Nonunions of the Carpal Bones"Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in Russian, with data points, sample sizes, and conclusions. Plus updates on changes in Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary of the guideline text, 2025 edition. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

These guidelines cover fractures of the carpal and hand bones, as well as delayed union and nonunions in adults and children. The main clinical priorities are to identify occult fractures, confirm injuries using imaging, select immobilization or surgery based on stability and displacement, and initiate early rehabilitation.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Take the history: mechanism of injury, fall on an outstretched hand or direct blow, duration and dynamics of pain, prior diagnostics and treatment, dominant hand, occupation, and sports activities (LRE C, LE 5). → in text
  2. Perform an examination of the injured extremity and a consultation with an orthopedic trauma surgeon; assess swelling and range of motion restriction. Palpate the injury area, including the anatomical snuffbox, the scaphoid tubercle, and other carpal bone zones (LRE C, LE 5). → in text
  3. Perform radiography of the wrist and hand. For suspected scaphoid fractures, anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique views are required; if other methods are unavailable, repeat radiographs 10–14 days after initiating plaster immobilization (LRE C, LE 5). → in text
  4. In case of clinical suspicion of a fracture and negative radiographs, perform an MRI of the hand; this method is also used when concomitant ligamentous injury is suspected (LRE C, LE 5). → in text
  5. If X-ray or MRI signs of displacement are present, or in cases of neglected fractures or nonunions, perform a CT scan of the upper extremity (hand) (LRE C, LE 5). → in text
  6. In children with suspected fractures, follow-up radiography and MRI of the hand in three projections are performed on days 7–21; standard radiography can be false-negative in 90.9% of cases due to the cartilaginous structure of the carpal bones (LRE C, LE 5). → in text
  7. Before planned surgery, perform preoperative laboratory tests, including blood type and Rh factor, creatinine, glucose, ALT, AST, and tests for syphilis, viral hepatitis B and C, and HIV; these tests do not establish the diagnosis (LRE C, LE 5). → in text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

When is a scaphoid fracture considered a nonunion?

If there is no consolidation within 6 months after the injury. Up to 4 weeks, the fracture is considered acute; from 4 weeks to 6 months, it is considered a delayed union. → in text

What to do in case of pain in the anatomical snuffbox and normal radiographs?

Maintain clinical suspicion of a fracture, perform an MRI of the hand; if other methods are unavailable, repeat radiographs 10–14 days after initiating plaster immobilization are acceptable. → in text

When are carpal bone fractures treated without surgery?

For stable, undisplaced fractures, plaster immobilization is used followed by consolidation control. The duration depends on the injured bone: for many fractures it is 4–6 weeks, for the capitate bone 6–8 weeks, for the hamate hook up to 11 weeks; the scaphoid is immobilized until CT-confirmed consolidation. → in text

What are the indications for surgery in a trapezium fracture?

Surgery is required for displacement greater than 2 mm, unstable body fractures, any subluxation in the carpometacarpal joint, displaced or unstable crest fractures, and bone dislocation after reduction. → in text

Is routine VTE prophylaxis necessary after wrist surgery?

For upper extremity surgeries under local or regional anesthesia, routine pharmacological VTE prophylaxis is not recommended (LRE C, LE 5). → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
971, edition 1 (ID 971_1)
Publication date
November 26, 2025
Age category
adults, children
ICD-10 codes
S62S63.0S63.1T92.2
Specialties
Traumatology and Orthopedics
Developers
Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedists of Russia
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Rubricator — 971_1

Abridged Clinical Guidelines: Fractures and Nonunions of the Carpal Bones

An abbreviated version of this guideline from WhiteCoat Pro — 32 pages: each section of the document is summarized concisely in plain language, complete with tests and fill-in-the-blanks for self-assessment. Designed for when you need not just to read a guideline, but to master it for an exam, accreditation exam, or clinical practice.
All abbreviated guidelines: 310
Beginning of abbreviated version — open

Terminology

  • Hypothenar — a muscle group of the hand located along the ulnar border of the palm, forming the eminence of the little finger.

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition

  • Fractures of the carpal and hand bones — injuries to the carpal bones, metacarpals, or phalanges resulting in a loss of structural integrity.
  • Non-union of a carpal bone — a fracture that fails to unite despite adequate time allowed for bone healing.
  • Risk factors for development: absence of treatment, non-surgical treatment, inadequate treatment.

1.2 Etiology and Pathogenesis

General etiology: application of external force exceeding bone strength.

Main mechanisms of injury:

  • Direct mechanical impact on the bone.
  • Fall onto an outstretched hand (in extreme positions of wrist flexion/extension).
  • Extreme stress due to an extended wrist during sports activities (gymnastics, weightlifting).

Features of scaphoid fracture pathogenesis:

Bone healing and the development of complications directly depend on the specifics of its blood supply:

  • Distal 20–30% (tubercle of the distal pole and waist region): supplied via palmar branches of the radial artery.
  • Proximal 70–80% (proximal pole): supplied via dorsal branches of the radial artery through poor intraosseous blood flow.

Pathogenesis of complications: A scaphoid fracture disrupts the intraosseous vascular network, which potentially leads to:

  • Ischemia and (sometimes) necrosis of the proximal pole.
  • Formation of a non-union (pseudoarthrosis).

1.2.1 Etiology and pathogenesis features in children

  • Carpal bone fractures in children are a rare injury.
  • The low incidence is due to anatomical features of bone structure (note: the thought is cut off on this page).

Features of ossification and carpal bone injuries in children

Timetable of carpal bone ossification:

At birth, the carpal bones are represented by cartilaginous tissue.

  • Capitate bone: 1–6 months (most commonly at 2 months).
  • Hamate bone: 1–6 months (most commonly at 3 months).
  • Triquetral bone: 2–4 years.
  • Lunate bone: 3–5 years.
  • Trapezium and trapezoid bones: 4.5–6 years.
  • Scaphoid bone: 5–6 years.
  • Pisiform bone: 10–12 years (ossification center appears last).
  • Additionally: an accessory ossification center in the hook of the hamate may be observed up to 11 years of age.

By the age of 13–15 years, the structure of the carpal bones does not differ from that of adults.

Clinical significance and injury mechanisms in children:

  • Due to the timing of ossification, fractures in children more frequently occur in the distal region of the wrist.
  • Low-energy mechanism: occurs most frequently (in 80% of cases associated with a fall).
  • High-energy injuries: impacts, crushing, motor vehicle accidents. Result in fractures of the capitate, triquetrum, and hamate bones (mechanism: bones colliding with each other under the influence of an external force).
  • Associated injuries: combinations of carpal bone fractures with each other are possible, as well as a specific combination — fractures of the scaphoid and capitate bones with a radius fracture.

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition (Groups of Diseases or Conditions)

General trauma statistics:

  • Hand bone fractures: 9–13% of all skeletal fractures.
  • Carpal bone fractures: up to 10% of all hand bone fractures.
  • Wrist and hand injuries: 25–65% of all wrist joint injuries.
  • In specialized upper limb surgery departments, the consequences of injuries account for 40–56% of patients with hand pathology.

Associated injuries:

In 18.5% of cases, carpal bone fractures are combined with:

  • radius fractures;
  • fractures of the radial and ulnar styloid processes;
  • fractures and dislocations of other carpal bones, metacarpals, and phalanges.
The official full text of the guideline below remains open and free. Only the condensed study version as a whole is paid: section-by-section explanations, self-assessment tests, and integration with platform materials.

List of Abbreviations

AB – antibacterial drugs

ATOR – All-Russian Public Organization "Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedists of Russia"

CT – computed tomography

MRI – magnetic resonance imaging

AVN (Avascular necrosis) – avascular bone necrosis

SNAC (Scaphoid Nonunion Advanced Collapse) – scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse

N (norm) – norm

l (length) – length

h (height) – height

LISA (lateral intrascaphoid angle) – lateral intrascaphoid angle

DCA (dorsal cortical angle) – dorsal cortical angle

SSI – surgical site infection

MDRT – multidisciplinary rehabilitation team

Terms and Definitions

1) Undisplaced bone fracture – a fracture without angular, width, or rotational displacement of bone fragments [11].

2) Displaced scaphoid fracture – usually includes 1 of 4 signs [11, 12]:

a) displacement of 1 mm, typically on the radial or dorsal surface;

b) gap between fragments > 1 mm;

c) volar angular displacement of the fragments, manifested by:

  • Dorsal cortical angle > 160 degrees (N≤160º) (Fig. A);

  • Lateral intrascaphoid angle > 35 degrees (N≤35º) (Fig. B);

  • Scaphoid height-to-length ratio > 0.65 (N≤0.65) (Fig. C);

Terms and Definitions — Fractures and Nonunions of the Carpal Bones

d) rotation of the fragments.

3) Occult scaphoid fracture – a scaphoid fracture with no radiographic evidence of fracture on initial radiographs [13].

4) Malunited scaphoid fracture – consolidation in a malposition with scaphoid deformation (most commonly flexion and pronation of the distal fragment relative to the proximal one) [11].

5) Humpback deformity – an angular displacement between the proximal and distal fragments resulting from volar tilt of the distal fragment and dorsal tilt of the proximal fragment [13, 14].

6) Dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI) – occurs as a result of extension of the lunate in concert with the proximal fragment of the scaphoid linked by the scapholunotriquetral ligament, which can occur independently or as a result of a humpback deformity, leading to disruption of wrist biomechanics and the potential development of osteoarthritis [15].

7) Hypothenar – a group of intrinsic hand muscles located on the ulnar border of the palm, forming the eminence of the little finger.

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Fractures of the carpal bones and hand – traumatic injuries to the carpal bones, metacarpals, or phalanges resulting in a breach of their integrity.

Carpal bone nonunion – a fracture that fails to heal despite an adequate period for consolidation. It may develop following non-operative treatment, in untreated patients, or after inadequate treatment [11].

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

The etiology of carpal and hand bone fractures involves external force exceeding the bone's structural strength. Most commonly, this is a direct mechanical impact to the bone, a fall onto an outstretched hand with the wrist in extreme flexion or extension, or extreme loading via an extended wrist during sports activities (gymnastics and weightlifting) [1, 45, 46].

The blood supply to the scaphoid affects its bone healing and the development of complications [13]. The blood supply to the distal 20–30% of the scaphoid is derived from palmar branches of the radial artery, which pass near the tubercle of the distal pole and supply the latter as well as the waist region of the bone. The blood supply to 70–80% of the scaphoid is provided by dorsal branches of the radial artery, which supply the proximal pole via a tenuous intraosseous blood supply. Scaphoid fractures disrupt the intraosseous vascular network, which can potentially lead to:

  • ischemia and occasionally necrosis of the proximal pole;

  • development of nonunion.

1.2.1 Specifics of etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions) in children

Carpal bone fractures in children are rare injuries. Their low incidence is largely due to their structural characteristics, requiring greater force to fracture than in adults [76]. At birth, the carpal bones are cartilaginous. Ossification centers initially appear between 1 and 6 months of age in the capitate (most commonly at 2 months) and the hamate (most commonly by 3 months). Subsequently, ossification centers appear in the triquetrum from 2 to 4 years, the lunate from 3 to 5 years, the trapezium and trapezoid from 4.5 to 6 years, and the scaphoid at 5–6 years. Lastly, at 10–12 years of age, an ossification center appears in the pisiform. An accessory ossification center may be present in the hook of the hamate up to 11 years of age. By 13–15 years of age, the structure of the carpal bones is indistinguishable from that of adults [86, 81]. Considering the timeline of ossification, carpal bone fractures in children are more frequently located in the distal segment [84, 82]. Carpal bone fractures in the pediatric population have a low-energy mechanism and are associated with falls in 80% of cases. However, high-energy injuries have also been described, such as trauma resulting from direct blows, crush injuries, and motor vehicle accidents [77]. The capitate, triquetrum, and hamate are most susceptible to such forces. Fractures occur as a result of bones impacting each other due to high-energy external forces [78].

In addition to isolated fractures, simultaneous multiple carpal bone fractures can occur in children [79], as well as combined scaphoid and capitate fractures associated with a radius fracture [90].

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

According to Russian-language literature, hand bone fractures account for 9 to 13% of all human skeletal fractures, with carpal fractures comprising up to 10% of these [2]. According to various sources, wrist and hand injuries account for 25–65% of all wrist joint traumas [3]. In the overall structure of specialized upper extremity surgery departments, post-traumatic sequelae account for 40–56% of all patients with hand pathologies [4]. In 18.5% of cases, carpal bone fractures occur concurrently with fractures of the radius, the radial and ulnar styloid processes, as well as fractures and dislocations of other carpal bones, metacarpals, and phalanges [5]. The scaphoid is most frequently injured (scaphoid fractures account for 70 to 90% of all carpal bone fractures, 11% of hand fractures, and 2.4% of all human skeletal fractures) [6–8]. Approximately 18% of all carpal fractures are triquetral fractures, trapezium fractures account for about 3–5%, lunate fractures – 4%, capitate fractures – 2%, hamate fractures – 2%, pisiform fractures – 1–2%, and trapezoid fractures – less than 1% [45].

Scaphoid fractures are more common in men, with a ratio of 2:1 [12]. These injuries are most frequently seen in young patients with high activity levels, including males aged 15–29 years and girls aged 10–14 years; they are rare in toddlers and elderly individuals, the latter due to lower bone density in the distal metaphysis of the radius compared to the scaphoid, which typically predisposes to distal radius fractures [16].

1.3.1 Specific epidemiology of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions) in children

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fractures, accounting for 0.5% of upper extremity fractures and less than 3% of hand and wrist fractures in this patient population. Such injuries are most commonly observed in adolescents aged 11 to 17 years and are very rare in children under 8 years of age [82].

Injuries to other carpal bones in children are quite rare; clinical cases of capitate, trapezoid, triquetral, pisiform, and lunate bone injuries have been reported (0.3–24.4%) [87, 76].

Isolated trapezium fractures are rare injuries, particularly among adolescents, accounting for only 0.4% of all carpal fractures [80].

Capitate fractures are the second most frequent carpal fracture after scaphoid fractures, accounting for approximately 0.3% of all carpal bone fractures [87].

The incidence of scaphoid nonunion in children is reported in the literature to average 1.5%, which primarily results from missed or misdiagnosed injuries. Unlike adult patients, the distal third of the scaphoid is most frequently affected, while proximal fractures are rare due to the large cartilaginous cap of the proximal pole [82].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

These clinical guidelines provide information on fractures and dislocations of the carpal and hand bones, as well as their sequelae:

- S62 Fracture at wrist and hand level

- S63.0 Dislocation of wrist

- S63.1 Dislocation of finger

- T92.2 Sequelae of fracture at wrist and hand level

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

Carpal fractures are considered acute up to 4 weeks from the time of injury; delayed union is defined from 4 weeks to 6 months; and nonunion is diagnosed when there is no consolidation within 6 months post-injury [9, 10].

The anatomical classification of scaphoid fractures is based on the location of the fracture line within the bone [12–14]:

  • Proximal third (in approximately 5% of patients);

  • Middle third (waist) (in approximately 70% of patients);

  • Distal third (in approximately 10–20% of patients);

  • Scaphoid tubercle (in approximately 5% of patients).

Modified Herbert classification of scaphoid fractures (1996) [10]:

Fracture type

Description

Stability

A1

Tubercle fracture

Stable

A2

Incomplete waist fracture

B1

Distal oblique fracture

Unstable

B2

Complete waist fracture

B3

Proximal pole fracture

B4

Trans-scaphoid perilunate fracture-dislocation of the wrist (most commonly at the level of the scaphoid waist)

D1

Fibrous union

Non-acute fractures

D2

Pseudarthrosis

D3

Pseudarthrosis with sclerosis of the proximal fragment

D4

Fracture with avascular necrosis of the bone

Triquetral fractures are classified into:

  1. Dorsal cortical (avulsion) fracture,

  2. Body fracture,

  3. Volar avulsion fracture – avulsion of the palmar ulnotriquetral and lunotriquetral ligaments [44, 46].

Trapezium fractures are classified into [46, 101]:

Fracture type

Fracture characteristics

Vertical intra-articular

Resulting from axial compression of the first ray of the hand

Horizontal

Result of horizontal shearing load

Fracture of the dorsal tuberosity

Result of shearing force of the first metacarpal bone and the radial styloid process

Fracture of the anterior medial ridge

A) involving the articular surface of the carpometacarpal joint,

B) involving the articular surface of the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint

Result of axial loading or avulsion of the transverse carpal ligament

Comminuted fracture

Result of high-energy trauma

Fractures of the lunate bone are divided into:

  1. Fractures of the volar column,

  2. Fracture of the dorsal column,

  3. Transverse fracture,

  4. Osteochondral,

  5. Transarticular body fracture [46].

Fractures of the capitate bone are divided into:

  1. transverse body fracture,

  2. transverse pole fracture,

  3. vertical-frontal,

  4. parasagittal.

Fractures of the hamate bone are classified into:

  1. Fractures of the hook.

  2. Fractures of the hamate body:

A. fracture of the proximal pole

B. of the medial tuberosity

C. oblique sagittal

D. dorsal coronal [46]

Fractures of the pisiform bone are classified into:

  1. Transverse fracture,

  2. Parasagittal fracture,

  3. Comminuted fracture,

  4. Pisotriquetral compression fracture.

Isolated fractures of the trapezoid bone are divided into fractures of the dorsal margin and the body.

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

General symptoms of carpal bone fractures:

- local pain syndrome in the projection of the injured bone,

- range of motion in the wrist joint limited by pain,

- edema in the injury zone.

Clinical signs of a scaphoid fracture:

- pain along the radial aspect of the wrist joint upon pressure on the tendon of the flexor carpi radialis [12] (manifests as deep dull pain, worsening with fist clenching or wrist movements [17]; "pain in the anatomical snuffbox" area, or as pain in the projection of the scaphoid bone, which is not observed in all patients [18]),

- pain syndrome upon movement in the joints of the first digit [18],

- decreased range of motion in the wrist joint [14],

- decreased grip strength [14],

- edema in the projection of the fracture (inconsistent sign) [17].

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

It is recommended to collect medical history and complaints regarding skeletal system pathology in all patients with hand trauma in order to determine the circumstances of seeking medical care [11].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: collection of complaints and medical history is included in the scope of the corresponding medical service provided to the patient from section "B" of the nomenclature of medical services (approved by Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 804n dated October 13, 2017, with subsequent amendments and additions).

It is recommended for the practicing physician to find out about:

  1. the nature of the sustained injury, whether there was a fall onto an outstretched hand or a direct high-energy impact to the wrist [11];

  2. the time elapsed since the injury and the dynamics of changes in the nature of the pain syndrome, including the diagnosis and treatment of other wrist injuries [11];

  3. the presence of the dominant hand, the nature of primary work, and hobbies [19];

  4. lifestyle factors associated with an increased risk of scaphoid fracture, including participation in:

  • high-contact team sports such as football and basketball [12];

  • other sports, including cycling, skateboarding, rollerblading, and snowboarding [20].

2.2 Physical Examination

It is recommended for all patients with suspected fracture at the wrist and/or hand level to undergo a consultation with a traumatologist-orthopedist (initial consultation (examination, consultation) of a traumatologist-orthopedist) in order to establish a diagnosis and determine treatment tactics, and to perform a visual examination of the injured extremity with suspected carpal bone fracture to clarify the diagnosis [11, 12, 22].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: during the visual examination, it is possible to diagnose edema in the fracture zone, and limitation of wrist joint movements (see section 1.6).

It is recommended to palpate the injury area in all patients with suspected carpal and hand bone fractures to clarify the diagnosis [7, 8].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: in case of a scaphoid fracture, palpation reveals:

  1. Pain syndrome in the projection of the anatomical snuffbox, increasing with ulnar deviation of the wrist [17];

  2. Pain syndrome in the projection of the scaphoid tubercle upon axial loading or upon palpation in the projection of the scaphoid tubercle itself [11, 12];

  3. Pain syndrome upon axial loading of the first ray of the injured hand [11];

  4. Positive scaphoid shift test (Watson test) [21].

During this test, the examiner places the thumb over the scaphoid tubercle, grasps the distal radius with the II–V fingers, and holds the patient's wrist in ulnar deviation. While moving the wrist into radial deviation, the examiner applies increasing pressure to the scaphoid tubercle. Pain during this test may indicate a possible scaphoid fracture, while a "click" or "clunk" suggests scapholunate instability.

Palpation findings in triquetral fracture include:

  1. Local tenderness over the triquetrum;

  2. Pain along the ulnar border of the wrist;

  3. Local pain over the triquetrum upon wrist flexion.

Palpation findings in trapezium fracture include:

  1. Focal tenderness over the trapezium;

  2. Tenderness at the base of the thumb, increasing with resisted wrist flexion (inconstant symptom);

  3. Palpation of the injury site should be supplemented with the grinding test.

Palpation findings in lunate fracture include:

  1. Pain over the dorsal aspect of the wrist;

  2. Swelling over the lunate.

Palpation findings in hamate fracture include:

  1. Pain along the ulnar palmar aspect over the hook (increasing with active grip, ulnar deviation, and wrist extension);

  2. Swelling and hematoma in the hypothenar region (in hook fracture), dorsal hand swelling over the hamate (in body fracture);

  3. Ulnar nerve paresthesias (inconstant symptom).

Palpation findings in pisiform fracture include:

  1. Pain along the ulnar border of the wrist, directly over the pisiform;

  2. Signs of ulnar neuropathy (inconstant symptom).

Palpation findings in trapezoid fracture include:

  1. Mildly localized pain in the region of the base of the second metacarpal and the anatomic snuffbox;

  2. Swelling on the dorsal aspect of the hand over the trapezoid.

Comments: palpation of the injury site is part of the corresponding medical service provided to the patient, falling under section "B" of the nomenclature of medical services (approved by Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 804n of October 13, 2017, with subsequent amendments and additions).

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

  • All patients diagnosed with carpal bone fractures for whom surgical treatment is planned are recommended to undergo the following laboratory tests for preoperative preparation [22, 75]:

    • Determination of ABO blood groups and Rh factor (D antigen);

    • Blood creatinine level test;

    • Blood glucose level test;

    • Determination of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity in blood;

    • Determination of antibodies to Treponema pallidum;

    • Determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in blood;

    • Determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to Hepatitis C virus in blood (including total anti-HCV antibodies);

    • Determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) in blood;

    • Determination of antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV 2 in the blood.

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: these laboratory tests are not definitive for establishing the diagnosis, but are necessary for planning surgical intervention, further treatment tactics, and postoperative laboratory monitoring. Additional diagnostic methods should be applied if the patient has comorbid conditions.

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

It is recommended to perform wrist radiography and hand radiography in patients with suspected upper extremity bone fractures to clarify the diagnosis [23].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: "radiography of the injury site," at the discretion of the ordering medical professional, corresponds to one or more medical services of the "radiological examinations with subsequent description and radiotherapy" type, including—but not limited to—the following medical services:

- upper extremity radiography;

- radius and ulna radiography;

- wrist radiography;

- metacarpal radiography;

- hand radiography;

- radiography of hand phalanges;

- radiography of finger phalangeal bones of the hand;

- radiography of the thumb.

In case of suspected scaphoid fracture:

Three projections must be performed: anteroposterior and lateral projections plus an additional view (semi-pronation). Options for additional views include: An external oblique anteroposterior radiograph centered on the scaphoid with the wrist in pronation and ulnar deviation. An anteroposterior radiograph with the hand clenched into a fist and in ulnar deviation, taken with a proximal tilt (where the X-ray beam is directed toward the elbow), outlines the scaphoid length and helps detect occult fractures. Repeat radiographs for diagnostic purposes are performed 10–14 days after the initiation of suspected plaster immobilization if other instrumental diagnostic procedures are unavailable.

In case of suspected triquetral fracture:

- anteroposterior radiographs,

- anteroposterior radiographs in radial deviation of the wrist,

- lateral radiographs,

- lateral radiographs with 45-degree wrist pronation [45, 46].

In case of suspected trapezium fracture:

- anteroposterior radiographs,

- anteroposterior radiographs in pronation (Bett view),

- lateral radiographs,

- carpal tunnel view radiographs [44, 45].

In case of suspected lunate fracture, standard anteroposterior, lateral, and ¾ view radiographs are performed, along with corresponding radiographs of the contralateral limb to identify carpal anatomy variants [45, 46].

In case of suspected capitate fracture, standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs are performed, or a CT scan if there is no fragment displacement [44, 45].

In case of suspected capitate fracture, standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs are performed, or a CT scan if there is no fragment displacement [44, 45].

In case of suspected hamate fracture, carpal tunnel view radiographs or a CT scan is performed [44, 45].

In case of suspected pisiform fracture:

- lateral radiographs,

- lateral radiographs in ulnar deviation and wrist extension,

- anteroposterior radiographs with clenched fist and ulnar deviation of the wrist [44, 45]. If diagnosis is difficult based on radiographs, a CT scan is performed.

When a trapezoid fracture is suspected, standard radiographs of the wrist in anteroposterior, lateral, and ¾ views are performed, which can reveal subluxation of the second metacarpal bone in the presence of a trapezoid fracture.

It is recommended to perform wrist MRI in all patients with suspected fracture and no evidence of fracture on wrist radiographs, or in the presence of clinical data indicating concomitant ligamentous injury of the wrist joint [11-13].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

It is recommended that all patients undergo computed tomography of the upper extremity (wrist) if there is evidence of displaced carpal bone fractures on radiography or MRI, or in cases of delayed/malunited fractures or nonunions of the carpal bones [11-13].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

2.4.1 Features of instrumental diagnostic studies in children

It is recommended that children undergo follow-up wrist radiography in three projections during the treatment stage (7–21 days post-injury) to detect a fracture [90, 91, 92].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

It is recommended that children undergo magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in three projections during the treatment stage (7–21 days post-injury) to detect a fracture [90, 91, 92].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: in children, standard radiography of the carpal bones may yield false-negative results in 90.9% of cases because the cartilaginous structure is not visible on X-rays.

Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging help identify isolated carpal bone fractures in children [87, 85, 92, 94, 95, 96]. However, in children under 7–8 years of age, MRI may be as uninformative as radiography because the cartilaginous cover of the carpal bones is elastic, durable, and may remain visibly undamaged when the ossification center is fractured [83].

MRI is most informative for detecting avascular necrosis and determining the presence or absence of union [88, 89].

2.5 Other Procedures

No.

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

3.1 Conservative treatment in adults

  • If a stable, nondisplaced scaphoid fracture or an occult fracture is detected, it is recommended to apply a short palmar plaster cast (application of a plaster cast for bone fractures) from the middle third of the forearm to the distal palmar crease with or without fixation of the first ray of the hand [8].

Gle BLE 3Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) — B (Level of Evidence – 3).

Comments: application of a short plaster cast without immobilizing the thumb is comparable in efficacy to fixation with thumb immobilization [11, 12, 14].

Plaster immobilization is maintained until bone union is confirmed at 4–8 weeks via follow-up CT scanning [11, 14]. For isolated nondisplaced scaphoid tubercle fractures, a computed tomography scan of the upper extremity (wrist) must be performed for evaluation 4 weeks after the start of plaster immobilization; for fractures at the waist or distal third of the scaphoid, at 8 weeks [13]. If there are no signs of union on the follow-up CT scan after 8 weeks of plaster immobilization, immobilization is continued for another 4–6 weeks; if union is still absent (per CT) after this period, surgical treatment should be considered.

It is recommended to perform plaster immobilization in the postoperative period following surgical treatment of carpal bone fractures. If signs of union are absent at 8 weeks, re-immobilization is performed for an additional 2 weeks, followed by a follow-up computed tomography scan of the upper extremity (wrist); further immobilization is not performed [11, 13].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: postoperative immobilization is carried out using a palmar plaster slab from the proximal third of the forearm to the distal palmar crease of the hand until signs of union are detected on follow-up CT imaging (at 6–8 weeks post-surgery).

  • If a dorsal cortical fracture of the triquetrum with minor displacement or a nondisplaced fracture is detected, it is recommended to apply a short palmar plaster cast (application of a plaster cast for bone fractures) from the middle third of the forearm to the distal palmar crease without fixation of the first ray of the hand, with the aim of achieving triquetral fracture union over 4–6 weeks, followed by computed tomography of the upper extremity (wrist) [44-46].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

It is recommended to perform conservative treatment with a thumb spica cast for patients with fractures of the trapezium body and the base of the crest for a duration of 4–6 weeks [46].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: if pain persists after the immobilization period, consider early excision of the crest.

It is recommended to provide conservative treatment in the form of plaster immobilization for 4–6 weeks to achieve union in nondisplaced or stable lunate fractures (dorsal fragments), followed by a follow-up computed tomography scan of the upper extremity (wrist) [44, 45].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

It is recommended to provide conservative treatment for nondisplaced capitate fractures. Plaster immobilization is performed for 6–8 weeks, followed by a follow-up computed tomography scan of the upper extremity (wrist) [44-46].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

It is recommended to provide conservative treatment for nondisplaced hamate fractures and stable hook and body fractures. Immobilization is performed with a short plaster cast for 4–6 weeks for body fractures, and up to 11 weeks for hook fractures [44-46].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

It is recommended to provide conservative treatment for nondisplaced or parasagittal pisiform fractures [44, 45]. Conservative treatment includes plaster immobilization in a short plaster cast for up to 4–6 weeks [47].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

It is recommended to provide conservative treatment for trapezoid fractures in stable, nondisplaced cases [44-46]. Conservative treatment includes plaster immobilization in a short plaster cast for up to 4–6 weeks [47].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

3.1.2 Features of conservative treatment in children

  • If there is a clinical suspicion of a carpal bone fracture in a child (even in the absence of radiological findings), it is recommended to apply plaster immobilization with fixation of the first metacarpophalangeal joint, followed by a follow-up radiographic examination in 7–14 days [92].

Gle BLE 3Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) — B (Level of Evidence – 3).

It is recommended to perform conservative treatment of scaphoid fractures in children using plaster immobilization for a period of 8 to 12 weeks. It is most preferable to use a plaster cast extending to the middle third of the forearm, in a position of dorsiflexion and physiological abduction of the thumb; immobilization can be performed with or without fixation of the metacarpophalangeal joint. According to the literature, the second option is preferable [100].

Gle ALE 2Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) — A (Level of Evidence – 2).

It is recommended to perform conservative treatment of capitate fractures in children using plaster immobilization for 6 to 12 weeks [87, 93].

Gle CLE 4Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) — C (Level of Evidence – 4).

It is recommended to perform conservative treatment of pisiform fractures in children using closed reduction, followed by plaster cast fixation for 5 to 6 weeks [98].

Gle CLE 4Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) — C (Level of Evidence – 4).

3.2 Surgical treatment in adults and children

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment (closed fracture reduction with internal fixation, osteosynthesis for small bone fractures of the limbs, surgery for multiple fractures and injuries, small skeletal bone osteosynthesis, bone reconstruction, orthopedic arthroplasty of small joints of the foot and hand, hand and finger arthroplasty, bone reconstruction, bone osteotomy using internal fixators and external fixation devices, and fracture fragment reduction) in patients with displaced carpal bone fractures, fractures of the proximal scaphoid pole, nonunions (including asymptomatic ones), malunited fractures, or scaphoid nonunions with progressive complications, including AVN (hereinafter avascular necrosis) or SNAC (hereinafter scapholunate advanced collapse) [11].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: surgical treatment of scaphoid fractures can shorten return-to-work time and improve functional outcomes compared to nonoperative treatment.

  1. Surgical treatment of displaced scaphoid fractures includes:

    - fragment reduction under arthroscopic control and internal fixation with 1.0 Kirschner wires or a screw,

    - open reduction with internal fixation using 1.0 Kirschner wires or a screw.

    Surgical treatment of nondisplaced scaphoid fractures consists of percutaneous screw fixation of the bone.

  2. Surgical treatment of long-standing ununited scaphoid fractures without displacement or bone deformity is performed via percutaneous screw or Kirschner wire fixation. In the presence of bone deformity or DISI, internal screw fixation is supplemented by open or arthroscopic reduction and cancellous bone grafting.

  3. Surgical treatment of scaphoid nonunions, depending on the department's capabilities and the surgeon's skills, involves resection of the nonunion zone (using open or arthroscopic techniques) within well-perfused bone tissue, followed by:

    - correction of scaphoid deformities, cancellous bone autografting, and Kirschner wire fixation.

    - grafting with a vascularized pedicled bone graft from the radial metaphysis (or a free vascularized femoral condyle bone flap) with simultaneous correction of scaphoid deformities and screw fixation,

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment (closed reduction of fracture with internal fixation, osteosynthesis for fractures of small bones of the extremity, surgeries for multiple fractures and injuries, osteosynthesis of small skeletal bones, bone reconstruction, orthopedic replacement of small joints of the foot and hand, arthroplasty of the hand and fingers, bone reconstruction, bone osteotomy using internal fixators and external fixation devices, bone fragment reduction in fractures) for triquetral fractures with displacement (and disruption of the midcarpal joint arc).

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: surgical treatment of triquetral fractures involves open reduction, pin or screw fixation with fixation of the lunotriquetral joint (in case of perilunate ligament injury), or osteosynthesis of the triquetrum with a compression screw/pins for an isolated fracture [44–46].

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment (closed reduction of fracture with internal fixation, osteosynthesis for fractures of small bones of the extremity, surgeries for multiple fractures and injuries, osteosynthesis of small skeletal bones, bone reconstruction, orthopedic replacement of small joints of the foot and hand, arthroplasty of the hand and fingers, bone reconstruction, bone osteotomy using internal fixators and external fixation devices, bone fragment reduction in fractures) for trapezium fractures with a displacement of more than 2 mm, unstable body fractures, any degree of subluxation in the carpometacarpal joint, displaced or unstable crest fractures, and dislocation of the bone after its reduction.

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: surgical treatment of trapezium fractures involves open reduction and fixation with screw(s) or pins with bone autografting if indicated [44–47].

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment (closed reduction of fracture with internal fixation, osteosynthesis for fractures of small bones of the extremity, surgeries for multiple fractures and injuries, osteosynthesis of small skeletal bones, bone reconstruction, orthopedic replacement of small joints of the foot and hand, arthroplasty of the hand and fingers, bone reconstruction, bone osteotomy using internal fixators and external fixation devices, bone fragment reduction in fractures) for lunate fractures in case of displaced or unstable fractures.

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: in case of a lunate body fracture, open reduction and screw osteosynthesis of the bone are performed,

- for dorsal rim fractures with injury to the scapholunate and/or lunotriquetral ligaments, ligament repair with bone tunnels and fixation devices is performed,

- volar rim fractures require fixation with a screw or pins,

- severe comminuted fractures require an individualized approach, with possible partial healing or proximal row carpectomy [44, 45].

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment (closed reduction of fracture with internal fixation, osteosynthesis for fractures of small bones of the extremity, surgeries for multiple fractures and injuries, osteosynthesis of small skeletal bones, bone reconstruction, orthopedic replacement of small joints of the foot and hand, arthroplasty of the hand and fingers, bone reconstruction, bone osteotomy using internal fixators and external fixation devices, bone fragment reduction in fractures) for capitate fractures in case of displaced fractures, multi-comminuted fractures, and fracture-dislocations of the wrist.

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: surgical treatment of capitate fractures involves open reduction and screw fixation, with bone autografting if indicated, or percutaneous pin fixation [44, 45].

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment (closed reduction of fracture with internal fixation, osteosynthesis for fractures of small bones of the extremity, surgeries for multiple fractures and injuries, osteosynthesis of small skeletal bones, bone reconstruction, orthopedic replacement of small joints of the foot and hand, arthroplasty of the hand and fingers, bone reconstruction, bone osteotomy using internal fixators and external fixation devices, bone fragment reduction in fractures) for hamate fractures in case of displaced body fractures, multi-comminuted fractures, pain syndrome due to nonunion of the hook, or ulnar neuropathy associated with this complication.

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments:

1) for hook fractures, excision or open reduction and screw osteosynthesis is performed.

2) for displaced body fractures, open reduction, fixation with screws, plates, or Kirschner wires should be performed [46].

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment (closed reduction of fracture with internal fixation, osteosynthesis for fractures of small bones of the extremity, surgeries for multiple fractures and injuries, osteosynthesis of small skeletal bones, bone reconstruction, orthopedic replacement of small joints of the foot and hand, arthroplasty of the hand and fingers, bone reconstruction, bone osteotomy using internal fixators and external fixation devices, bone fragment reduction in fractures) for pisiform fractures with significant fragment displacement, comminuted fractures, flexor carpi ulnaris dysfunction, and persistent pain after conservative treatment.

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: surgical treatment consists of excision of the pisiform bone followed by repair or reconstruction of the flexor carpi ulnaris, if necessary.

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment (closed reduction of fracture with internal fixation, osteosynthesis for fractures of small bones of the extremity, surgeries for multiple fractures and injuries, osteosynthesis of small skeletal bones, bone reconstruction, orthopedic replacement of small joints of the foot and hand, arthroplasty of the hand and fingers, bone reconstruction, bone osteotomy using internal fixators and external fixation devices, bone fragment reduction in fractures) for trapezoid fractures with significant fragment displacement or intra-articular fracture.

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

Comments: surgical treatment consists of open reduction, osteosynthesis with a screw or Kirschner wires, followed by plaster immobilization for 6–8 weeks.

3.3 Other Treatment

3.3.1 Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis

  • During the surgical treatment of adults and children with carpal bone fractures and nonunions requiring metal implant placement, it is recommended to perform surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) to prevent surgical site infections via a single preoperative administration of an antibacterial drug to reduce the risk of infectious complications [50, 51].

GCR CLEL 5Recommendation Consensus Level — C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments. In accordance with international clinical guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections [50, 52], the objective of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is to establish bactericidal concentrations of an antibacterial drug in tissues undergoing microbial contamination during surgery to prevent surgical site infections. The necessity of SAP is determined by the surgical wound class of the upcoming operation: SAP is not required for "clean" surgical wounds not associated with the implantation of orthopedic and metallic devices. SAP should be performed: for clean-contaminated and contaminated surgical wounds; for "clean" surgical wounds involving the implantation of orthopedic and metallic devices. In infected ("dirty") wounds, SAP is not indicated; antibiotic therapy is administered instead.

  • In patients with fractures and nonunions of the carpal bones, it is recommended to use first- and second-generation cephalosporins (1st and 2nd generation, ATC J01DB, J01DC) (cefazolin**, cefuroxime**) as first-line drugs for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in traumatology and orthopedic surgery; as alternatives in case of beta-lactam antibiotic intolerance – glycopeptide antibacterial drugs (vancomycin**), lincosamides (#clindamycin**) [50]. The use of these medicinal products is carried out taking into account the age restrictions specified in the instructions for medical use.

Leveled Clinical Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence – 5).

Comments. For patients with an unremarkable allergic history and without significant risk factors for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus carriage, first- and second-generation (1st and 2nd generation) cephalosporins (cefazolin**, cefuroxime**) are used for SAP, administered intravenously 30 to 60 minutes before skin incision. In case of beta-lactam antibiotic intolerance, vancomycin** should be prescribed, administered over at least 60 minutes with the start of intravenous infusion 2 hours before the incision, or #clindamycin**. In the presence of significant risk factors for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus carriage (MRS), the SAP regimen should include systemic antibacterial drugs (ATC: J01) with anti-MRS activity (vancomycin**). In most cases, a single preoperative dose of a systemic antibacterial drug is sufficient for effective prophylaxis. For prolonged procedures (more than 3 hours) or massive blood loss, an additional intraoperative dose of a systemic antibacterial drug (ATC: J01) should be administered (estimated timing of intraoperative administration is two half-lives after the preoperative dose). Administration of systemic antibacterial drugs (ATC: J01) after wound closure in the operating room is inappropriate, even in the presence of inserted drains.

A prospective randomized clinical trial showed that administering an antibacterial drug for SAP 1 minute after tourniquet application demonstrated a statistically significant advantage in terms of reducing the incidence of surgical site infection, wound healing time, and overall patient satisfaction compared to administering the antibiotic before tourniquet application [53].

Single doses of main antibacterial drugs for SAP in traumatology and orthopedic surgical interventions in adults: cefazolin** 2 g (if patient weight ≥120 kg – 3 g), cefuroxime** 1.5 g, #clindamycin** 900 mg, vancomycin** 15 mg/kg as a slow IV infusion [50].

Single doses for children should be calculated based on actual weight: cefazolin** 30 mg/kg, cefuroxime** 50 mg/kg, #clindamycin** 10 mg/kg, vancomycin** 15 mg/kg; the use of fluoroquinolones (ATC: J01MA) during the period of musculoskeletal system development is contraindicated due to the risk of arthropathy [50, 54, 55].

It is recommended that adult patients with fractures and nonunions of the carpal bones receive antibacterial therapy for no more than 72 hours after wound closure [56].

GCR ALOCE 1Grade of Recommendation — A (Level of Evidence — 1).

Comments. In cases of open fractures, prophylactic antibiotic administration is effective in preventing early infection, and the drug should be administered as soon as possible after trauma. Cefazolin** is the antibiotic of choice; however, in patients with high-energy open fractures, major vascular injury, or heavily contaminated wounds, it is advisable to broaden the spectrum of prescribed antibiotics to cover gram-negative pathogens. In such cases, for adult patients, it is possible to consider adding #gentamicin** (at a dose of 6 mg/kg once daily) to cefazolin** [57,58]. An alternative to this combination for patients over 18 years of age may be #ampicillin + sulbactam** (at a dose of 3.0 g every 8 hours for 3 days) [59]; the latter is particularly relevant in cases of the risk of clostridial infection. According to the majority of researchers, in Gustilo-Anderson type III open fractures, antibiotics should not be continued for more than 72 hours after soft tissue wound closure [60].

  • During the surgical treatment of patients with fractures and nonunions of the carpal bones, it is recommended to administer surgical site infection prophylaxis for no more than 24 hours [61].

GCR CLEL 5Recommendation Consensus Level — C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: in accordance with the regulatory documentation in force in the Russian Federation (SanPiN 3.3686-21) and clinical guidelines [61], in order to achieve an effective concentration of the antibacterial drug in tissues and blood serum at the time of the skin incision, antibiotics for surgical site infection prophylaxis should be administered intravenously within 30 to 60 minutes prior to the skin incision, or within 2 hours prior to the incision when using vancomycin**. The maximum duration of prophylactic systemic antibacterial drug administration should not exceed 24 hours after the completion of the surgery. In most cases, a single dose of a systemic antibacterial drug is sufficient for effective prophylaxis. Additional doses should be administered during prolonged surgeries when the half-life of the administered systemic antibacterial drug has elapsed since preoperative administration, creating a risk of the antibacterial drug concentration dropping below the bactericidal level and increasing the risk of surgical site infections.

3.3.2 Postoperative analgesia

  • For the purpose of adequate analgesia in patients with fractures and nonunions of the carpal bones, it is recommended to use multimodal analgesia for adults and children, taking into account age restrictions, which may include NSAIDs (from group M01A Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products), paracetamol**, and immediate-release opioids (ATC group code N02A) considering age restrictions in the package leaflet, or monomodal analgesia if multimodal administration is not feasible [65, 66, 67, 68].

GCR ALOCE 1Grade of Recommendations — A (Level of Evidence — 1).

Comments: it is necessary to ensure adequate pain relief for the patient with a fracture prior to any manipulations and throughout the entire treatment period, the duration of which varies significantly depending on the chosen management strategy. When providing analgesia in a hospital setting, it is necessary to take into account prescriptions administered at the emergency medical care stage. In the acute trauma period, for pain relief purposes, proper fragment immobilization must be provided using a vacuum splint, vacuum mattress, or external fixation device.

Among pharmacological strategies, the current consensus is the use of multimodal analgesia (MMA), which involves the administration of multiple analgesics (opioid and non-opioid) from the N02 Analgesics group with different mechanisms of action, along with non-pharmacological interventions targeting the peripheral and/or central nervous system [69]. This combination provides more effective pain relief by potentiating the effects of various drugs, which in most cases leads to a reduced frequency of prescriptions and/or lower doses of opioid analgesics. Thus, MMA improves the risk profile of each medication while ensuring synergistic pain control through different drug classes. Postoperative MMA may include psychotherapy, physical therapy, NSAIDs, paracetamol**, regional anesthesia (single-shot or continuous peripheral nerve catheter placement), local injections, and opioids [66, 70].

In modern literature, authors emphasize using the lowest effective doses of opioids for the shortest possible duration, avoiding extended-release opioids. As an adjuvant during MMA in adult patients, a single intravenous dose of #dexamethasone** 1.25–20 mg can be administered prior to surgery (60 minutes before the incision), which significantly reduces pain severity [65].

It must be kept in mind that the duration of parenteral administration of most NSAIDs from the ATC group M01A "Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids" (ketorolac**, ketoprofen**, diclofenac**) is limited to two days in accordance with the instructions for medical use, which requires timely switching of the patient to oral administration, changing the drug, or approving further use with the medical commission. The specific choice of local anesthesia method and medicinal products is made by the attending physician individually, in accordance with the patient's characteristics, local protocols, and the equipment of the medical organization.

When prescribing analgesic therapy for children, a single dose should be chosen taking into account the child's weight and age. Preference should be given to analgesics with oral or rectal administration routes, avoiding intramuscular injections.

It is recommended to perform local blockade or regional anesthesia as part of the postoperative multimodal regimen [66, 71].

GCR ALeE 1Grade of Recommendation — A (Level of Evidence – 1).

Recommended analgesics from the N02 Analgesics group are listed in Appendices A3.1, A3.2, A3.3.

3.3.3 Prevention of venous thromboembolic complications

  • Routine pharmacological VTE prophylaxis is not recommended for upper extremity surgeries performed under local or regional anesthesia [62].

GCR CLEL 5Recommendation Consensus Level — C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: issues regarding VTE prophylaxis in orthopedic trauma patients are discussed in detail in the 2022 clinical guidelines [63] and the 2023 Russian expert recommendations [64].

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

Wrist injuries can lead not only to impaired hand and finger function, but also to difficulties with daily activities and self-care, which impairs the patient's quality of life. Trauma care is crucial in treating this injury, but complete recovery is impossible without rehabilitation. Regardless of the treatment method—conservative with cast immobilization or surgical—rehabilitation begins from the first days and continues through all stages until full recovery. A multidisciplinary, comprehensive, yet individualized approach helps shorten recovery times. Conducting staged rehabilitation using therapeutic exercise (exercise therapy), massage, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy accelerates functional recovery and improves the patient's quality of life [32, 36, 39, 42].

Staged rehabilitation is recommended for conservative and surgical treatment of patients with carpal bone fractures and dislocations to restore impaired hand and finger functions, social, domestic, and professional abilities, carried out by the multidisciplinary rehabilitation team (MDRT) according to the protocols of the relevant treatment period [29, 31, 32, 36, 37].

GCR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: given the great importance of the hand and fingers as an organ of self-care and labor operations, rehabilitation is essential and aimed at restoring impairments caused by trauma and immobilization. Following a wrist dislocation, joint mobility can be severely restricted, requiring specialized mobilization techniques. Muscle weakness following immobilization is invariably noted, and its recovery is necessary to maintain joint stability and perform occupational tasks. Coordination of movements and control over fine motor skills are lost, requiring specialized proprioceptive training. The ultimate goal of rehabilitation is to restore a person's ability to perform daily activities and tasks, starting with self-care, writing, handling objects, housework, and labor tasks, which requires the use of occupational therapy [29, 31, 32, 36, 37].

A rehabilitation program is recommended for the immobilization period of carpal bone fractures/dislocations to improve local blood circulation, prevent joint stiffness and muscle hypotrophy, drawn up by a physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) physician/exercise therapy doctor for home execution [29-32, 34].

GCR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: the duration of the immobilization period varies and averages 4 weeks for acute dislocations after closed reduction, 6 weeks for chronic dislocations after open reduction and K-wire fixation, up to 3 months for acute carpal bone fractures without displacement, and up to 8 weeks for acute carpal bone fractures following open reduction and internal fixation with wires/screws [31, 32, 34, 36, 37].

The duration of the period is determined in consultation with an orthopedic trauma surgeon.

The rehabilitation program is designed individually by a PRM/exercise therapy physician and consists of therapeutic gymnastics (formulating a therapeutic exercise course plan, prescribing a set of therapeutic exercise routines, exercise therapy physician appointment (examination, consultation)):

- active movements of the fingers and in the elbow joint - flexion/extension, gripping a soft ball and small objects to prevent joint stiffness,

- isometric forearm muscle contractions to improve blood circulation and prevent muscle atrophy,

- ideomotor exercises,

- dynamic exercises for healthy limbs.

During a brief hospital stay after surgical treatment, local cryotherapy and magnetotherapy (magnetic field therapy) through the cast are prescribed to reduce edema and pain.

A phased outpatient rehabilitation program for the early post-immobilization period in accordance with the timelines following carpal bone fractures/dislocations is recommended to improve hand and finger function, muscle strength, movement coordination, and self-care. Rehabilitation programs are formulated in a differentiated manner by a PRM/exercise therapy physician according to the nature of the injury, fracture or joint stability, and treatment method, and are conducted by the MDRT [29-32, 34-37].

GCR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: in the early stage of the recovery period (6–12 weeks) after cast removal, the rehabilitation program consists of:

- therapeutic gymnastics (A19.04.001.003) with joint mobilization exercises (active finger movements, passive flexion/extension using the healthy hand at the wrist joint, circular wrist movements (clockwise/counterclockwise));

- to improve muscle strength (dynamic exercises with resistance and light weights (holding a light weight (0.5 kg) with slow extension, resistance to flexion/extension with an elastic band;

- coordination and proprioception recovery exercises [26, 27, 35];

- passive mechanotherapy (A19.30.006.001 robotic mechanotherapy);

- ultrasound therapy (A17.30.034 medicinal ultraphonophoresis) and thermotherapy [38, 39] for scar softening;

- manual hand and forearm massage and/or electrostatic field massage to reduce pain (medical upper extremity massage, alternating electrostatic field exposure);

- local underwater whirlpool massage;

- hydrokinesitherapy (A19.03.003.023 hydrokinesitherapy for bone fractures).

An outpatient rehabilitation program for the late post-immobilization period (3-6 months) is recommended to restore hand and finger function, arm performance, self-care, and work activity, which is developed by a PRM/exercise therapy physician and implemented by the MDRT [29-34, 36-39].

GCR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: the rehabilitation program includes:

- therapeutic gymnastics (A19.04.001.003) to restore muscle strength: wrist flexion/extension with dumbbells (1–2 kg) and resistance, with resistance during supination/pronation using an expander;

- occupational therapy (modeling real-life activities such as picking up small objects or turning a doorknob, faucet, etc.), grasping and holding, transferring small objects (coins, balls), modeling with clay, writing, etc. [42, 43];

- hand and forearm massage;

- vibration therapy as an element of manual or hardware massage [33];

- soft tissue manual therapy techniques (A21.03.004);

- proprioception training [26, 27, 35] on biofeedback training devices (A19.04.001.014).

Important: proprioception can and should be trained even during the immobilization period using visualization and mirror therapy methods. Studies (e.g., Rosenkranz et al., J Hand Ther 2022 [41]) show that early proprioceptive stimulation reduces recovery time by 17-23%. However, these methods are rarely used in our country and are not included in the nomenclature of medical services.

It is recommended to introduce modern technologies with proven efficacy into rehabilitation programs for severe hand and finger injuries requiring prolonged recovery in specialized rehabilitation centers, which accelerate and improve the effectiveness of functional recovery: robotic biofeedback training devices, vibration stimulation, and proprioceptive stimulation methods [24, 25, 28, 33, 41].

CGR CLEL 5Level of recommendation validity — C (level of evidence reliability — 5).

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

Specific prevention of fractures and dislocations of hand phalanges and metacarpal bones has not been developed. Measures to reduce traumatism and comply with safety regulations at home and in the workplace are relevant. Dispensary observation for hand bone fractures is not regulated.

  • To prevent carpal bone fractures, it is recommended to include the use of special protective equipment (such as wrist guards for snowboarders, etc.) in sports associated with an increased risk of injury [48].

Gle ALE 2Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) — A (Level of Evidence – 2).

6. Organization of Medical Care

Clinical application of recommendations: Traumatology and Orthopedics, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical Rehabilitation, Health Organization and Public Health.

Purpose of the clinical guidelines: Clinical guidelines are developed to improve the quality of medical care, standardize diagnostic and treatment algorithms for patients with carpal bone fractures and nonunions.

Indications for hospitalization are clinical situations requiring surgical treatment (see section 3.2).

Indications for discharge of a patient from a medical organization are: clear regression of pain syndrome, absence of signs of active inflammation, patient mobilization and initiation of medical rehabilitation, or refusal of the patient/guardians in case of legally established incapacity of the patient to continue inpatient treatment (the reason for refusal must be documented in the medical record with the personal signature of the patient or their guardians).

7. Additional Information

In the postoperative period, there remains a probability of post-immobilization contractures, purulent-inflammatory processes, and Sudeck's atrophy, which require prolonged comprehensive treatment and monitoring [49].

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

Criteria for Assessing Quality of Medical Care — Fractures and Nonunions of the Carpal Bones

Criteria for Assessing Quality of Medical Care — Fractures and Nonunions of the Carpal Bones

References

Show references
  1. Clin Plast Surg. 2019 Jul;46(3):469-477. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Apr 12. Fractures of the Carpal Bones. Brian M Christie, Brett F Michelotti. Affiliations Expand. PMID: 31103090 DOI: 10.1016/j.cps.2019.03.007

  2. Musalatov KH. Traumatology and orthopedics: textbook / ed. by KH. Musalatov, GS. Yumashev. - 4th ed., rev. and supp. - M.: Meditsina, 1995. – 560 p.

  3. Cheremisin VM, Ishchenko BI. Emergency radiation diagnostics of mechanical injuries. – SPb: GIPPOKRAT, 2003. - P. 3-5.

  4. Volkova AM. Hand surgery. Vol. 3 / AM. Volkova. - Yekaterinburg: Uralsky Rabochiy, 1996. - 208 p.

  5. Golubev IO. Carpal instability / IO. Golubev // Selected Issues of Plastic Surgery. - 2001. - Vol. 1, No. 8. - P. 52-53.

  6. Kotelnikov GP. Traumatology: national guidelines / team of authors; ed. by GP. Kotelnikov, SP. Mironov. – M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2008. – 368 p.

  7. Clementson, M. Acute scaphoid fractures: guidelines for diagnosis and treatment / M. Clementson, A. Björkman, N.O.B. Thomsen // EFORT Open Rev. – 2020. Vol. 5, №2. – P. 96-103.

  8. Van Tassel, D. C. Incidence estimates and demographics of scaphoid fracture in the US population / D. C. Van Tassel, B. D. Owens, J. M. Wolf // J Hand Surg Am. – 2010. – №35. – P. 1242-1245.

  9. Borges, C. S. Scaphoid Reconstruction / C. S. Borges, P. H. Ruschel, M. B. Pignataro // Ortop Clin North Am. – 2020. – Vol.51, №1. – P. 65-76.

  10. Ko, J. H. Management of Scaphoid Fractures / J. H. Ko, M. A. Pet, W. C. Hammert // Plast Reconstr Surg. – 2017. – Vol.140, №2. – P. 333-346.

  11. Dias J,Kantharuban S. Treatment of Scaphoid Fractures: European Approaches. Hand Clin. 2017 Aug;33(3):501-509.

  12. Fowler JR, Hughes TB. Scaphoid fractures. Clin Sports Med. 2015 Jan;34(1):37-50.

  13. Schmitt R, Rosenthal H. Imaging of Scaphoid Fractures According to the New S3 Guidelines. Rofo. 2016 May;188(5):459-69

  14. Sendher R, Ladd AL. The scaphoid. Orthop ClinNorth Am. 2013 Jan;44(1):107-20.

  15. Winston M.J., Weiland A.J. Curr Rev MusculoskeletMed 2017 Mar;10(1):38 doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9382-y.

  16. J Hand Surg Am 2008 Jul-Aug;33(6):988.

  17. Phillips T.G., Reibach A.M., Slomiany W.P. Am Fam Physician 2004 Sep 1;70(5):879.

  18. JHand Surg Am 2008 Jul-Aug;33(6):988.

  19. Hile D., Hile L. Emerg Med Clin North Am 2015 May;33(2):397 DOI: 10.1016/j.emc.2014.12.009.

  20. Tassel D.C.V., Owens B.D., Wolf J.M. J Hand SurgAm 2010 Aug;35(8):1242 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.05.017

  21. Daniels J.M.2, ZOOK E.G., Lynch J.M. AmFam Physician 2004 Apr 15;69(8):1941.

  22. Kotelnikov GP. Traumatology. National guidelines / ed. by GP. Kotelnikov, SP. Mironov. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2017. 528 p.

  23. Torabi M., Lenchik L., Beaman F. D. et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute hand and wrist trauma. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2019; 16(5S): S7-S17.

  24. Alentorn-Geli, E., et al. (2020) "Local vibration therapy improves proprioception and motor function in patients with distal radius fractures: A randomized controlled trial"J. of Hand Therapy V. 33, Issue 2, April-June 2020, P. 123-130 DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.12.005

  25. American Physical Therapy Association (2023) "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vibration Therapy in Hand Rehabilitation"Available at: www.apta.org/vibration-guidelines

  26. Rosenkranz K., et al. (2022)."Sensorimotor training during limb immobilization improves proprioception and motor function after cast removal" J. of Hand Therapy, 35(3), 345-356.DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.12.003

  27. Petranyuk A., et al. (2021)."Early proprioceptive rehabilitation after wrist immobilization: A randomized controlled trial"Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 102(8), 1501-1510.DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.017

  28. Hesse et al. (2021)"Robot-assisted hand rehabilitation after wrist fractures"J Neuroeng Rehabil. 18: 84. 

  29. Herzberg, G., Merlini, L., & Burnier, M. (2019)."Acute Perilunate Dislocations: A Systematic Review of Current Treatment Options.Hand Clinics, 35(1), 13-21.DOI:10.1016/j.hcl.2018.08.002

  30. Wong, J., & Maffulli, N. (2021).*"Rehabilitation for Carpal Bone Fractures and Dislocations: An Evidence-Based Approach."British Medical Bulletin, 138(1), 85-99. DOI:10.1093/bmb/ldaa040

  31. Herzberg G. (2023) "Acute Carpal Dislocations: 2023 Treatment Algorithm"Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) DOI: 10.1177/17531934231152133

  32. Wolfe SW, et al. "Evidence-Based Management of Wrist Ligament Injuries" J. of Hand Surgery (American Volume) 2022, Vol./No.: 47(8) p.: 789-804. DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.05.003

  33. Pollock, M., et al. (2022)"Vibration therapy for improving proprioception in chronic wrist instability"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Issue 5, Art. No.: CD015259DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015259

  34. Lalonde, D. H., & Wong, A. (2021)."How soon should we mobilize patients after wrist fracture surgery? A meta-analysis." Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 147(1), 39e-48e.

  35. Dias, J. J., et al. (2020)."Rehabilitation after scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis."J. of Hand Surgery (European Volume), 45(8), 818-826. DOI: 10.1177/1753193420937617

  36. Buijze, G. A., et al. (2018). "Clinical and radiological outcomes of early mobilization versus cast immobilization after surgical fixation of scaphoid fractures: a randomized controlled trial." J. of Bone and Joint Surgery, 100(13), 1072-1079. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01189

  37. Herzberg, G., et al. (2019)."Acute perilunate dislocations: a systematic review of current treatment options."Hand Clinics, 35(1), 13-21.DOI: 10.1016/j.hcl.2018.08.002

  38. Hoang-Kim, A., et al. (2018)."Physical therapy interventions for carpal fractures: a Cochrane review summary."J.l of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 48(4), 324. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2018.0404

  39. European Hand Trauma Society (EHTS, 2021)."Rehabilitation protocols for carpal injuries." DOI: 10.1016/j.jhse.2021.03.001

  40. American Society of Hand Therapists (2023)."Clinical Guidelines for Proprioceptive Rehabilitation in Wrist Trauma". www.asht.org/guidelines

  41. Rosenkranz et al. "The effects of sensorimotor training on proprioception and functional outcomes in patients with chronic wrist instability: A randomized controlled trial" J. of Hand Therapy. 2022. Vol./No.: 35(4) p. 567-576 DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2022.03.002

  42. Souer JS, Buijze GA, Ring D. "Occupational Therapy Versus Independent Exercise After Volar Plate Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial" J. of Hand Surgery (American Volume). 2021. Vol./No.: 46(5) p. 387-395 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.03.017

  43. Hoang-Kim A., Pegreffi F., Moroni A., Ladd A. Effectiveness of Occupational Therapy Interventions for Adults With Musculoskeletal Conditions of the Forearm, Wrist, and Hand: A Systematic Review. J. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2022, Vol./No.: 103(6) p. 1209-1222.e7 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.01.153

  44. Christie BM, Michelotti BF. Fractures of the Carpal Bones.Clin PlastSurg. 2019 Jul;46(3):469-477

  45. Urch EY, Lee SK. Carpal fractures other than scaphoid. Clin Sports Med. 2015Jan;34(1):51-67

  46. Suh N, Ek ET, Wolfe SW. Carpal fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Apr;39(4):785-91

  47. Pan T, Lögters TT, Windolf J, Ksaufman R. Uncommon carpal fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Feb;42(1):15-27

  48. Russel K, Hagel B, Francescutti LH. Clin J Sport Med. 2007 Mar;17(2):145-50 doi: 10.1097/JSM.0b013e31803f901b.

  49. Vanvelk N., Chen B., Van Lieshout EMM, et al. Duration of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in open fractures: a systematic review and critical appraisal. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 11(3):293.

  50. Bratzler D.W., Dellinger E.P., Olsen K.M., et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery // Am. J. Health. Syst. Pharm. 2013. Vol. 70, № 3. P. 195–283.

  51. AO Principles of Fracture Management: Vol. 1: Principles, Vol. 2: Specific fractures / ed. Buckley R.E., Moran C.G., Apivatthakakul T. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 2018. P. b-006-149767.

  52. World Health Organization. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018. 184 p.

  53. Akinyoola A.L., Adegbehingbe O.O., Odunsi A. Timing of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Tourniquet Surgery // J. Foot Ankle Surg. 2011. Vol. 50, № 4. P. 374–376.

  54. Opri F., Bianchini S., Nicoletti L., et al. Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Patients of Neonatal and Pediatric Age Undergoing Orthopedic and Hand Surgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study // Antibiotics. 2022. Vol. 11, № 3. P. 289.

  55. Vlasova A.V., Smirnova E.V., Tenovskaya T.A., et al. Protocol for perioperative and postexposure antibiotic prophylaxis at the Morozovskaya Children's City Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Healthcare Department // Metropolitan Health. 2021. Vol. 2, No. 2. P. 46–64.

  56. Messner J., Papakostidis C., Giannoudis P.V., et al. Duration of Administration of Antibiotic Agents for Open Fractures: Meta-Analysis of the Existing Evidence // Surg. Infect. 2017. Vol. 18, № 8. P. 854–867.

  57. Sorger J.I., Kirk P.G., Ruhnke C.J., et al. Once Daily, High Dose Versus Divided, Low Dose Gentamicin for Open Fractures: // Clin. Orthop. 1999. Vol. 366. P. 197–204.

  58. Hoff W.S., Bonadies J.A., Cachecho R., et al. East Practice Management Guidelines Work Group: Update to Practice Management Guidelines for Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Open Fractures // J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care. 2011. Vol. 70, № 3. P. 751–754.

  59. Takahara S., Tokura T., Nishida R., et al. Ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefazolin plus aminoglycosides for antimicrobial prophylaxis in management of Gustilo type IIIA open fractures: A retrospective cohort study // Injury. 2022. Vol. 53, № 4. P. 1517–1522.

  60. What is the most optimal prophylaxtic antibiotic coverage and treatment duration for open fractures of long bones? [Electronic resource] // ICM Philly. 2019. URL: https://icmphilly.com/questions/what-is-the-most-optimal-prophylaxtic-antibiotic-coverage-and-treatment-duration-for-open-fractures-of-long-bones/ (accessed: 25.03.2024).

  61. Briko NI, Bozhkova SA, Brusina EB, et al.; National Association of Healthcare-Associated Infection Control Specialists (NASCI). Prevention of surgical site infections. Guidelines. M., 2022. 74 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.nasci.ru/?id=102733&download=1 (accessed: 27.04.2024).

  62. Roberts DC, Warwick DJ. Venous thromboembolism following elbow, wrist and hand surgery: a review of the literature and prophylaxis guidelines. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2014;39(3):306-312. doi:10.1177/1753193412469131

  63. Bozhkova SA, Tikhilov RM, Andriyashkin VV. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of thromboembolic complications in traumatology and orthopedics: guidelines // Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2022. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 136–166.

  64. Seliverstov EI, Lobastov KV, Ilyukhin EA. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Recommendations of Russian experts // Phlebology. 2023. Vol. 17, № 3. P. 152–296.

  65. Waldron N.H., Jones C.A., Gan T.J., et al. Impact of perioperative dexamethasone on postoperative analgesia and side-effects: systematic review and meta-analysis // Br. J. Anaesth. 2013. Vol. 110, № 2. P. 191–200.

  66. Wick E.C., Grant M.C., Wu C.L. Postoperative Multimodal Analgesia Pain Management With Nonopioid Analgesics and Techniques: A Review // JAMA Surg. 2017. Vol. 152, № 7. P. 691.

  67. Doleman B., Mathiesen O., Sutton A.J., et al. Non-opioid analgesics for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis // Br. J. Anaesth. 2023. Vol. 130, № 6. P. 719–728.

  68. Frizzell K.H., Cavanaugh P.K., Herman M.J. Pediatric Perioperative Pain Management // Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2017. Vol. 48, № 4. P. 467–480.

  69. Hsu J.R., Mir H., Wally M.K., et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pain Management in Acute Musculoskeletal Injury // J. Orthop. Trauma. 2019. Vol. 33, № 5. P. e158–e182.

  70. Lee S.K., Lee J.W., Choy W.S. Is multimodal analgesia as effective as postoperative patient-controlled analgesia following upper extremity surgery? // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2013. Vol. 99, № 8. P. 895–901.

  71. Richman J.M., Liu S.S., Courpas G., et al. Does Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Provide Superior Pain Control to Opioids? A Meta-Analysis // Anesth. Analg. 2006. Vol. 102, № 1. P. 248–257.

  72. Hauer J. Pain in children: Approach to pain assessment and overview of management principles // UpToDate. Poplack DG. Wolters Kluwer.

  73. Orliaguet G., Hamza J., Couloigner V., et al. A Case of Respiratory Depression in a Child With Ultrarapid CYP2D6 Metabolism After Tramadol // Pediatrics. 2015. Vol. 135, № 3. P. e753–e755.

  74. Schechter W. Pharmacologic management of acute perioperative pain in infants and children // UpToDate. Sun LS. Wolters Kluwer.

  75. Desai N., Schofield N., Richards T. Perioperative patient blood management to improve outcomes. Anesth Analg. 2018; 127 (5): 1211-1220.

  76. Weber, D. M., Kraus, R., Wirth-Welle, R., Andreisek, G., Gnannt, R., Guéro, S., Seiler, M. Paediatric fractures of carpal bones other than the scaphoid // Hand Surgery and Rehabilitation. – 2023. – Vol. 42. – №. 5. – P. 406-412.

  77. Wulff RN, Schmidt TL. Carpal fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998 Jul-Aug;18(4):462-5. PMID: 9661853.

  78.  Light TR. Injury to the immature carpus. Hand Clin 1988;4:415-24.

  79. Anderson WJ. Simultaneous fracture of the scaphoid and capitate in a child. J Hand Surg Am. 1987 Mar;12(2):271-3.

  80. Aldeeb M, Aminake GN, Khalil IA, Hayton M, Ksantini OEK, Hagert E. Isolated Trapezoid Fracture in Adolescent Goalkeepers: A Scoping Review of the Literature and a Report of Two Cases. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Oct 31;6(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.09.001.

  81. P. Journeau, Traumatismes du carpe chez l’enfant, Chirurgie de la Main, Volume 32, Supplement 1, 2013, Pages S16-S28, ISSN 1297-3203,

  82. Oestreich K, Jacomel TUY, Hassan S, Horwitz MD, Lindau TR. Pediatric Scaphoid Nonunions: A Case Series, Review of the Literature, and Evidence-Based Guidelines. J Wrist Surg. 2020 Feb;9(1):2-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3401035. Epub 2019 Dec 20. PMID: 32025347; PMCID: PMC7000270.

  83. Fujioka Hiroyuki, Nishikawa Tetsuo,  Takagi Yohei,  Oi Takanori , Yoshiya Shinichi.  Stress Fracture of the Ossification Center of the Scaphoid in a Skeletally Immature Gymnast - 2019 The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume) PG  - 386-388 10.1142/S2424835519720172 [doi]

  84. Al-Khater, K. M., Hegazi, T. M., Al-Thani, H. F., Al-Muhanna, H. T., Al-Hamad, B. W., Alhuraysi, S. M., ... & Siddiqui, F. B. (2020). Time of appearance of ossification centers in carpal bones: A radiological retrospective study on Saudi children // Saudi Medical Journal. – 2020. – Vol. 41. – №. 9. – P. 938

  85. Pan, T., Lögters, T. T., Windolf, J., & Kaufmann, R. (2016). Uncommon carpal fractures // European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. – 2016. – Vol. 42. – P. 15-27.

  86. Khisamutdinova A.R., Karelina N.R. Osteogenesis of forearm and hand bones as a reliable criterion for determining biological age // Russian Biomedical Research. – 2017. – Vol. 2. – No. 4. – P. 42-47.

  87. Gümüştaş, S. A., Tosun, H. B., Ağır, İ., & Uludağ, A. Nonunion of capitate due to late diagnosis in a teenager // The American Journal of Case Reports. – 2014. – Vol. 15. – P. 139.

  88. De Schrijver F, De Smet L: Isolated fracture of the capitate: the value of MRI in diagnosis and follow up. Acta Orthop Belg, 2002; 68(3): 310–15

  89. Albertsen J, Mencke S, Christensen L et al: Isolated capitate fracture diagnosed by computed tomography. Case report. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir, 1999; 31(2): 79–81

  90. Compson JP. Trans-carpal injuries associated with distal radial fractures in children: a series of three cases. J Hand Surg Br. 1992 Jun;17(3):311-4. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(92)90119-m.

  91. Nafie, S. A. A. Fractures of the carpal bones in children. Injury, 18 : 1987 117- 119.

  92. Eckert K, Tröbs RB, Schweiger B, Liedgens P, Radeloff E, Ackermann O. Diagnostisches Vorgehen bei Handwurzelknochenfrakturen im Kindesalter: eine retrospektive Analyse . Z Orthop Unfall. 2016 Feb;154(1):43-9. German. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1558078.

  93. Khoriati A, Jones C, Abdulkareem A, Ellahee N. Delayed identification of an isolated paediatric capitate fracture. Trauma Case Rep. 2017 Oct 31;12:8-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2017.10.004. PMID: 29644275; PMCID: PMC5887053.

  94. Jørgsholm P, Thomsen N, Besjakov J, Abrahamsson S, Björkman A. MRI shows a high incidence of carpal fractures in children with posttraumatic radial-sided wrist tenderness. Acta Orthop. 2016 Oct;87(5):533-7. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1210940. Epub 2016 Jul 20. PMID: 27436058; PMCID: PMC5016915.

  95. Romme KL, Thorninger R, Tvedegaard-Christensen J. [Fracture of os capitatum and os triquetrum in a child]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2019 Jan 21;181(4):V08180527. Danish. PMID: 30722834.

  96. Obdeijn MC, van der Vlies CH, van Rijn RR. Capitate and hamate fracture in a child: the value of MRI imaging. Emerg Radiol. 2010 Mar;17(2):157-9. doi: 10.1007/s10140-009-0815-9. Epub 2009 May 26. Erratum in: Emerg Radiol. 2010 Mar;17(2):169. van Vliet, Cornelis [corrected to van der Vlies, Cornelis H]. PMID: 19468765; PMCID: PMC2816242.

  97. Giannetti A, Fidanza A, Passeri M, Romanini E, Ciuffoletti A, Calvisi V. Pisiform Bone Dislocation in a Pediatric Patient: What is the Best Treatment? Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Hand Microsurg. 2020 Oct 29;14(4):339-342. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718863. PMID: 36398158; PMCID: PMC9666076.

  98. Hurni Y, Fusetti C, de Rosa V. Fracture dislocation of the pisiform bone in children: a case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2015 Nov;24(6):556-60. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000210. PMID: 26163866.

  99. Foley K, Patel S. Fractures of the scaphoid, capitate and triquetrum in a child: a case report. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012 Apr;20(1):103-4. doi: 10.1177/230949901202000121. PMID: 22535822.

  100. Shaterian A, Santos PJF, Lee CJ, Evans GRD, Leis A. Management Modalities and Outcomes Following Acute Scaphoid Fractures in Children: A Quantitative Review and Meta-Analysis. Hand (N Y). 2019 May;14(3):305-310. doi: 10.1177/1558944717735948. Epub 2017 Oct 27. PMID: 29078712; PMCID: PMC6535946.

  101. Gibney B, Murphy MC, Ahern DP, Hynes D, MacMahon PJ. Trapezium fracture: a common clinical mimic of scaphoid fracture. Emerg Radiol. 2019 Oct;26(5):531-540.

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

  1. Avdeichik NV, Candidate of Medical Sciences, trauma surgeon at the Department of Reconstructive Microsurgery and Hand Surgery, National Medical Research Center for Children's Traumatology and Orthopedics named after H.I. Turner of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  2. Balyura GG, Candidate of Medical Sciences, member of the interregional public organization "Hand Surgery Society — Hand Group", Moscow; member of ATOR.

  3. Galkina NS, trauma surgeon at the Department of Reconstructive Microsurgery and Hand Surgery, National Medical Research Center for Children's Traumatology and Orthopedics named after H.I. Turner of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  4. Geroeva IB, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow.

  5. Golubev IO, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Chairman of the interregional public organization "Hand Surgery Society — Hand Group", Moscow; member of ATOR.

  6. Grankin DYU, trauma surgeon at the Department of Reconstructive Microsurgery and Hand Surgery, National Medical Research Center for Children's Traumatology and Orthopedics named after H.I. Turner of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  7. Kokorev AI, Candidate of Medical Sciences, trauma surgeon, Head of the Department for Organization of Traumatological and Orthopedic Services, National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of ATOR.

  8. Nazarenko AG, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, Vice President of ATOR.

Conflict of interest: the members of the working group declare no conflict of interest in the development of this clinical guideline.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience for these clinical guidelines:

  1. Trauma and orthopedic surgeons

  2. Surgeons

  3. Pediatric surgeons

  4. General practitioners (family physicians)

  5. Medical rehabilitation physicians

Stages of assessing levels of evidence and grades of recommendation:

  1. Definition of search and selection criteria for publications on clinical trials (CT) regarding the efficacy and/or safety of the medical intervention described in the recommendation statement.

  2. Systematic search and selection of CT publications in accordance with the previously defined criteria.

Systematic search and selection of publications on clinical trials:

The evidence base for the guidelines consisted of publications selected through information retrieval in the databases of the Central Scientific Medical Library "Russian Medicine", MEDLINE (US National Medical Library) and COCHRANE Library, scientific electronic libraries eLibrary.ru and "CyberLeninka", as well as on the Internet using search engines Yandex, Google and Google Scholar, by reviewing leading specialized peer-reviewed domestic medical journals on this topic and treatment guidelines for fracture management from the international Association for Osteosynthesis AO/ASIF.

Table 1.Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

Table 2.Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, rehabilitation interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis

2

Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

Table 3. Rating scale for grades of recommendation (GR) for preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitation methods (interventions)

GoR

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.

The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

Appendix A3.1. Guidelines for pain management in major musculoskeletal trauma (surgical interventions for long bone fracture fixation or complex articular fracture, extensive soft tissue trauma, major surgery, etc.) in adults

The table presents analgesic drugs and their dosage regimens in accordance with the Clinical Guidelines for Pain Management in Acute Musculoskeletal Trauma [69].

Stage of treatment

Opioid analgesics (N02A group)

Non-opioid analgesics and gabapentin

Inpatient setting

Trimeperidine** 25–50 mg orally. Maximum single dose is 50 mg, maximum daily dose is 200 mg.

Ketorolac** 15 mg IV every 6 hours x 5 doses, then #ibuprofen 600 mg orally every 8 hours [5]

OR Pethidine** 10-40 mg (from 1 ml of 10 mg/ml solution to 2 ml of 20 mg/ml solution) IM, SC, or IV. Maximum single dose 40 mg, daily dose 160 mg.

Gabapentin 300 mg 3 times a day [69]

Morphine** 10–30 mg IM or SC as needed for severe breakthrough pain

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours

Outpatient stage

First week (after discharge)

Tramadol** single dose 100 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 100 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

#Ibuprofen** 600 mg orally every 8 hours for 7 days [69]

#Gabapentin 100 mg 1 tablet orally 3 times a day for 7 days [69]

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours for 7 days

Second week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

Gabapentin 300 mg 3 times a day (gradually titrate up to the maximum daily dose if necessary: 3600 mg/day)

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are tapered)

Third week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

Gabapentin as needed (max. 3600 mg/day)

Paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 12 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are tapered)

Fourth week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

Gabapentin as needed (max. 3600 mg/day)

Paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 8 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are tapered)

Fifth week and beyond

-

NSAIDs as needed

Paracetamol** as needed

Gabapentin as needed, then discontinue

Appendix A3.2. Guidelines for pain management in musculoskeletal trauma without surgery (closed fractures, superficial wounds, etc.) in adults

The table presents analgesic drugs and their dosage regimens in accordance with the Clinical Guidelines for Pain Management in Acute Musculoskeletal Trauma [69].

Type of injury

Opioid analgesics (N02A group)

Non-opioid analgesics

Minor trauma (minor bone fractures, sprains, superficial wounds)

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed,

paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 8 hours, then as needed

OR tramadol** single dose 50 mg IV as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

Major trauma (major bone fractures, ruptures)

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed,

paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 12 hours, then as needed

OR Tramadol** single dose 50 mg IV on demand, if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg in 30-60 minutes. Maximum daily dose 400 mg.

Appendix A3.3 Analgesic dosage regimen for children

Appendix A3. Reference Materials — Fractures and Nonunions of the Carpal Bones

Appendix A3. Reference Materials — Fractures and Nonunions of the Carpal Bones

Appendix A3. Reference Materials — Fractures and Nonunions of the Carpal Bones

1 In children under 12 years of age, morphine** is preferred when opioid analgesics need to be prescribed, as the use of tramadol** is associated with a higher risk of adverse reactions [72, 73].

2 Not recommended for use in children, as its metabolite accumulates in the body and can provoke seizures upon repeated administration [74].

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix B. Algorithms of Physician Actions — Fractures and Nonunions of the Carpal Bones

Appendix C. Patient Information

During the first days after applying a plaster splint, the condition of the fingers must be monitored. Excessive compression by the plaster cast can cause increased edema and lead to hemodynamic and neurological complications. In case of circulatory disorders, the soft bandage is cut and the edges of the splint are slightly bent. Active movements of the fingers are permitted from day 1 after the fracture and limb immobilization, or from day 1 after surgical treatment. Once the edema and pain syndrome subside, active movements in the elbow joint must be initiated, including pronation and supination under the supervision of a physical and rehabilitation medicine physician (or a medical rehabilitation physician, or an exercise therapy physician, or a physical therapist).

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

No.

Scales and calculators from this guideline

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)Assessment of disability after stroke

If you practice in traumatology and orthopedics

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer based on the guidelines "Fractures and Nonunions of the Carpal Bones" and other current clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, citing the specific section rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines