Patellar fractures: Clinical Guidelines

Applies toadults, children2025 editionS82.0

Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults, children. 2025 edition, ICD-10 codes: S82.0. This page features a abbreviated version by WhiteCoat Pro and the full official text.

Receive research articles on "Patellar fractures"Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in English, with figures, sample size, and conclusions. Plus updates to Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary of the guideline text, 2025 edition. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

A patellar fracture is a disruption of bone integrity, often involving the articular surface and carrying the risk of impairing the knee extensor mechanism. The guideline describes diagnostics, selection of conservative or surgical tactics, pain management, complication prevention, and staged rehabilitation in adults and children.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Take the medical history: clarify the fact and mechanism of injury — falling on the knee, direct impact, traffic accident, or excessive quadriceps contraction; document pain, restricted range of motion, and inability to extend the knee. → in the text
  2. Perform an initial physical examination by an orthopedic trauma surgeon (Level of Evidence C, Recommendation Grade 5): assess for deformity, swelling, tenderness, crepitus, pathological mobility, patellar tap, and continuity of the extensor mechanism. → in the text
  3. Be sure to check limb innervation and circulation, soft tissue condition, and the presence of an open wound; bone fragments in the wound or synovial fluid leakage indicate an open fracture in the presence of other clinical signs (Level of Evidence C, Recommendation Grade 5). → in the text
  4. Perform radiography of the patella or knee joint capturing the lower third of the femur and upper third of the tibia in two projections (Level of Evidence C, Recommendation Grade 5). An axial view may be required if a sagittal fracture is suspected. → in the text
  5. In case of an intra-articular or comminuted fracture pattern in adults, perform a spiral CT to clarify the fracture line, displacement, and damage to adjacent bones (Level of Evidence C, Recommendation Grade 5). → in the text
  6. If capsular-ligamentous apparatus injury or an osteochondral fracture is suspected in adults, perform an MRI of the knee joint (Level of Evidence C, Recommendation Grade 5). → in the text
  7. If surgery is planned, order a complete blood count and urinalysis, biochemical parameters, blood group and Rh factor, coagulogram with INR (Level of Evidence C, Recommendation Grade 5); for intermediate or high cardiovascular risk and low functional status, test for NT-proBNP (Level of Evidence A, Recommendation Grade 2). → in the text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

When can a patellar fracture be treated without surgery?

In stable non-displaced fractures or those with displacement of less than 2–3 mm, as well as in the presence of contraindications to surgery or patient refusal. Stability is confirmed by the absence of displacement on follow-up radiographs with knee flexion up to 60°. → in the text

What examination should be performed first?

Radiography of the patella or knee joint capturing adjacent regions in two projections. For suspected intra-articular or comminuted fractures in adults, spiral CT is added. → in the text

What are the main indications for osteosynthesis?

Fragment diastasis of 2 mm or more, articular surface step-off greater than 2 mm, loose osteochondral fragments, disruption of the extensor mechanism with loss of active extension, polytrauma, or ineffectiveness of conservative treatment. → in the text

How should pain be managed in a child with a patellar fracture?

Analgesia includes paracetamol and ibuprofen with single doses calculated based on weight, age, and instructions. For severe pain and insufficient efficacy of these drugs, other NSAIDs or opioids may be used if indicated and without contraindications. → in the text

When should rehabilitation and weight-bearing begin after surgery?

Rehabilitation starts on the first postoperative day, and a consultation with a physical and rehabilitation medicine physician is performed within the first 48 hours. Walking with crutches and weight-bearing are allowed under pain control; walking without crutches is possible after 6 weeks, and full weight-bearing no earlier than 3 months post-surgery. → in the text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
970, edition 1 (ID 970_1)
Publication date
November 25, 2025
Age category
adults, children
ICD-10 codes
S82.0
Specialties
Traumatology and Orthopedics
Developers
Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedists of Russia
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Guidelines Index — 970_1

Abbreviated Clinical Guidelines: Patellar Fractures

A concise 34-page version of this clinical guideline by WhiteCoat Pro: every section of the document is summarized briefly in its own words, complete with tests and fill-in-the-blanks for self-assessment. Designed for when you need not just to read a guideline, but to truly master it for an exam, accreditation exam, or clinical practice.
All abbreviated guidelines: 290
Beginning of abbreviated version — open

Page 9

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition

  • Patella: the largest sesamoid bone in the human body.
  • Location: situated within the substance of the distal tendon of the quadriceps femoris muscle (QFM), participating in the formation of the knee joint.
  • Patellar fracture (PF): disruption of the structural integrity of the patella. The fracture line (or lines) may extend into the articular surface.

Anatomy of the patella

  • Base (basis patellae): directed superiorly.
  • Apex (apex patellae): directed inferiorly.
  • Posterior surface: covered with articular cartilage. Participates in the formation of the patellofemoral articulation, articulating with the patellar surface of the femur.
  • Anterior surface: smooth, easily palpable through the skin.

Ligamentous apparatus and muscle attachments

  • Joint capsule: attaches strictly along the margin of the articular surface of the patella.
  • QFM tendon: attaches to the base of the patella, with some fibers weaving directly into the joint capsule.
  • Patellar retinacula (retinacula patellae): divided into medial and lateral. Formed by the inner and outer bundles of the QFM tendon running from the patella to the epicondyles of the femur and condyles of the tibia.
  • Patellar ligament (ligamentum patellae): a dense portion of the joint capsule inferior to the patella, additionally reinforced by fibers of the QFM tendon.

Biomechanics and functional significance

  • Role in the extensor mechanism: the patella acts as a fulcrum for the QFM tendon.
  • Lever system: forms two biomechanical levers — the QFM tendon and the patellar ligament. The patella acts as the fulcrum.
  • Biomechanical advantage:
  • Increases the efficiency of QFM contraction during leg extension by 30%.
  • By increasing the lever arm, it adds 60% of the force required for extension.
  • Functional load:
  • During leg extension, forces transmitted through the patella can reach 7 times body weight.
  • Activities of daily living (squatting, stair climbing) create stress on the anterior surface of the bone close to the fracture threshold.
  • Clinical significance: due to the tremendous loads, patellar osteosynthesis is subject to extremely high mechanical stability requirements.

Note to the previous section (end of paragraph): Impairment of full leg extension during trauma is most prominently manifested in the final 15° of extension.

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition

Main mechanisms and causes of patellar fractures (PF):

  • Predominant mechanism: Direct impact (due to the superficial location of the bone).
  • Most common causes:
  • Fall from standing height — 44.3%.
  • Road traffic accidents (RTA) — 33.0%.
  • Gender specificity of trauma:
  • Men: high-energy mechanism predominates (RTA — 44.1%).
  • Women: low-energy mechanism predominates (fall onto the knee joint — 68.3%).
  • Nature of displacement: About 50% of PFs occur without fragment displacement, leaving the extensor apparatus of the knee joint intact.

Anatomical and pathogenetic features:

  • The posterior surface of the patella participates in the formation of the patellofemoral articulation with the distal femur.
  • ¾ of the posterior surface is articular.
  • Clinical significance: The majority of PFs are intra-articular. This requires precise anatomical reduction of fragments to fully restore the congruence of articular surfaces.

Osteochondral lesions

The official full text of the guideline below remains open and free. Only the condensed study version as a whole is paid: section-by-section explanations, self-assessment tests, and integration with platform materials.

List of Abbreviations

VKA – vitamin K antagonists

ACT – activated clotting time

EFA – external fixation apparatus

AO – Association for Osteosynthesis

TIB – tibia

VTE – venous thromboembolism

RTA – road traffic accident

BMI – body mass index

Knee – knee joint

CT – computed tomography

HDL – high-density lipoproteins

LDL – low-density lipoproteins

PT – physical therapy

MDRT – multidisciplinary rehabilitation team

Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation – Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

MMA – multimodal analgesia

MRI – magnetic resonance imaging

LMWH – low-molecular-weight heparin from the B01AB heparin group

NSAIDs – nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from the M01A Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products group

UFH – unfractionated heparin (INN heparin sodium**)

PF – patellar fracture

SWD – surgical wound debridement

РКИ – randomized controlled trial

SCT – spiral computed tomography

TIA – transient ischemic attack

RF – risk factors

PRM – physical and rehabilitation medicine

FS – functional status

TENS – transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis

LCP – locking compression plate

MIPO – minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis

ORIF – open reduction internal fixation – open reduction with internal fixation

Terms and Definitions

Absolute stability – absence of micromotion at the fracture site, provided there is anatomical reduction and interfragmentary bone compression after fixation with hardware.

Anticoagulants – chemical substances and medicinal products that inhibit the activity of coagulation hemostasis (the blood clotting system) and prevent blood clot formation, belonging to the ATC group B01A "Antithrombotic agents".

Allograft – a bone tissue fragment from another human (donor), typically cadaveric, that has undergone preservation.

Antibacterial drug – a medicinal product from group J01 Antibacterials for systemic use.

External fixation device (EFD) – an orthopedic device containing an implant (a transosseous or extracorporeal element protruding through the skin, reaching the bone or inserted into it) and an external (non-implantable) support connecting bone fragments via transosseous elements in the treatment of fractures, pseudoarthrosis, or gradual lengthening (deformity correction) of a segment.

Autograft – a fragment of the patient's own bone harvested from a donor site for transplantation to fill a bone tissue deficit (bone defect).

Beta-lactam antibiotics – are a group of antibacterial drugs sharing a common structural element — the beta-lactam ring. They inhibit bacterial cell wall synthesis by binding to penicillin-binding proteins, leading to lysis and death of the microbial cell. According to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification, beta-lactam antibiotics include the following main groups: Beta-lactam antibacterials, penicillins (J01C) and Other beta-lactam antibacterials (J01D), of which the most clinically significant are first-generation (J01DB), second-generation (J01DC), third-generation (J01DD), fourth-generation (J01DE) cephalosporins, other cephalosporins and penems (J01DI), carbapenems (J01DH), and monobactams (J01DF).

Internal fixation device – an orthopedic implant implanted beneath the patient's skin that connects bone fragments in the treatment of fractures, deformities, or nonunions.

Impression – the process of articular surface fracture formation resulting from excessive pressure of the articulating bone exceeding the strength of spongy bone tissue, as well as the resulting impression fracture.

Fracture union – mutual connection of fragments by living bone tissue as a result of the successful completion of reparative regeneration.

Contracture – restriction of the range of motion in a joint.

Bone fragment – a portion of bone separated as a result of trauma, surgery, or a destructive process.

Migration of fixation elements – loss of the optimal position of fixation elements due to bone resorption around them, occurring when allowable cyclic loads or their number are exceeded, or due to errors in the surgical technique of implanting the element into the bone (within the context of this topic).

Load – mechanical force applied to a limb, bone, and fixation system during treatment, typically recurring with constant periodicity (cyclically).

Delayed union / Nonunion – changes in the reparative regeneration of bone tissue leading to a decrease in its rate, cessation, or formation of a callus insufficient to perform mechanical function.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs – nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from the group "Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids" (M01A).

Post-traumatic deformity – fracture consolidation with disruption of spatial relationships between fragments, including axial and rotational alignment.

Fixation stability – resistance of the system to external loads, allowing it to maintain the constancy of the mutual orientation of fragments and the optimal distance between them.

Fixation – a state in which relative or complete immobilization of fragments is achieved.

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Patella – the largest sesamoid bone in the human body, located within the thickness of the distal tendon of the quadriceps femoris muscle and participating in the formation of the knee joint. Patellar fractures (PF) are a disruption of the integrity of the bone structure of the patella; the fracture line or lines may extend to the articular surface [1, 2].

In the anatomy of the patella, the base of the patella facing upwards and the apex of the patella directed downwards are distinguished. The posterior surface of the patella is covered with articular cartilage and forms the patellofemoral articulation (patellofemoral joint) with the patellar surface of the femur. The anterior surface of the patella is smooth and easily palpable through the skin [3].

The joint capsule of the knee joint attaches to the patella along the edge of the articular surface. The tendon of the quadriceps femoris muscle attaches to the base of the patella, with fibers also weaving into the joint capsule. The internal and external tendon bundles run from the patella to the epicondyles of the femur and the condyles of the tibia and are called the medial and lateral patellar retinacula. The dense section of the knee joint capsule below the patella is reinforced by fibers of the quadriceps femoris tendon and is called the patellar ligament [3].

The patella is an important part of the extensor mechanism, acting as a fulcrum for the quadriceps femoris tendon. As a result, two levers are formed: the quadriceps tendon and the patellar ligament. This arrangement of the patella determines its high functional load. Forces transmitted through the patella during knee extension can reach seven times body weight. Certain activities, such as stair climbing and squatting, can generate tension on the anterior surface of the patella approaching the fracture threshold. Therefore, high demands are placed on patellar osteosynthesis in terms of load-bearing stability [1].

Due to its structural features and location, the patella increases the efficiency of quadriceps femoris contraction by 30% during knee extension [4, 5]. The increased lever arm of the extensor mechanism, due to the patella acting as a fulcrum, adds 60% of the force required for full knee extension, which is most pronounced in the final 15° of extension [1].

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

Due to the anatomical position of the patella, the predominant mechanism of injury is a direct blow. The most frequent causes of PF are falls from standing height (44.3% of cases) and motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) (33.0% of cases). Among men, a high-energy mechanism—MVAs (44.1% of cases)—prevails, whereas among women, a low-energy mechanism—falls onto the knee joint (68.3% of cases)—predominates [6]. About half of PFs are characterized by the absence of fragment displacement, with the extensor mechanism remaining intact [1].

Since the posterior surface of the patella forms the patellofemoral articulation with the distal femur and constitutes three-quarters of an articular surface, patellar fractures are mostly intra-articular, requiring anatomical reduction of fragments to restore articular surface congruence [6].

Osteochondral lesions are injuries to the cartilage and underlying subchondral bone, frequently encountered in children and adolescents. They typically result from low-energy trauma or sports activities [10]. Osteochondral lesions are most commonly observed following acute patellar dislocation. They manifest as damage to the medial facet of the patella and/or the lateral femoral condyle [11, 12]. The mechanism of dislocation may involve either direct impact on the patella, causing a traumatic dislocation, or the more common indirect mechanism—external rotation of the tibia combined with semi-flexion of the knee joint [13, 14]. The incidence of osteochondral fractures in acute patellar dislocation ranges from 39% to 71% [15, 16]. The young population is more susceptible to such injuries due to a combination of ligamentous hypermobility (increased shear risk during rotational movements) and a sharp change in mechanical properties at the transition zone from articular cartilage to subchondral bone [14]. These lesions are easily overlooked, which, in the absence of timely treatment, can lead to the premature development of degenerative joint disease [10, 17].

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

The incidence of patellar fractures (PF) ranges from 0.5% to 1.5% of all musculoskeletal injuries [7, 8]. Comminuted PFs account for 55% of all PFs [9]. According to a retrospective study by S. Byun et al. (2019), this injury occurs predominantly in men (in 61.9% of cases). The average age of patients is 51.3 years: 47.6 years for men and 57.4 years for women. However, the authors note that in recent years there has been a trend towards an increase in the average age of victims, as well as the proportion of female patients with patellar fractures [6].

In the pediatric population, patellar fractures account for approximately 1% of all fractures and are mainly associated with primary patellar dislocation or sports injuries with a direct trauma mechanism [161, 162].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

S82.0 – Fracture of patella

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

In clinical practice, PFs are conventionally divided into non-displaced and displaced fractures. Significant displacement affecting treatment choice is generally considered to be fragment separation of more than 3 mm or displacement of articular surface fragments of the patella by more than 2 mm [19]. Patellar fractures can be divided into extra-articular and intra-articular. Most often, PFs are intra-articular due to anatomical features [6]. One of the simplest classifications is dividing PFs by character (type):

  • transverse,

  • vertical,

  • comminuted,

  • marginal,

  • osteochondral [18].

From the perspective of selecting surgical treatment tactics, the AO/ASIF (Association for Osteosynthesis) classification is currently the most widely used. This classification also simplifies data recording and statistical processing in scientific research. According to the AO universal fracture classification, PF corresponds to code 34 [2]. Fractures of this localization are subdivided into three types based on the degree of involvement of the articular surface of the patella:

34-A – extra-articular fracture:

34-A1 – extra-articular avulsion fracture;

34-B – partial intra-articular fracture in the sagittal plane:

34-B1 – partial intra-articular fracture in the sagittal plane, lateral location;

34-B2 – partial intra-articular fracture in the sagittal plane, medial location;

34-C – complete intra-articular fracture in the horizontal plane:

34-C1 – complete intra-articular fracture in the horizontal plane, simple;

34-C2 – complete intra-articular horizontal fracture with a wedge-shaped fragment;

34-C3 – complete intra-articular horizontal fracture, comminuted [2].

Comments. The AO classification is based on the classification proposed by M. Speck and P. Regazzoni in 1994. According to it, patellar fractures can be divided into 3 types (A, B, C), with each type comprising three subgroups [21]. Earlier studies present patellar fracture classifications divided into 7 types [22]. However, it should be noted that the modern AO classification has gained the most popularity.

For open patellar fractures, the classification by R.B. Gustilo and J.T. Anderson (1976) [23], modified by R.B. Gustilo, R.M. Mendoza, and D.N. Williams (1984) [24], is used:

Type I – open fracture, the wound is minimally contaminated, wound size is less than 1 cm;

Type II – open fracture, the wound is greater than 1 cm and less than 10 cm in length without significant soft tissue damage, flaps, or skin detachment;

Type IIIA – open fracture, soft tissues cover the fragments, no periosteal stripping in the presence of extensive soft tissue damage or flaps, or in high-energy trauma regardless of wound size;

Type IIIB – open fracture with an extensive soft tissue defect, periosteal stripping, and a comminuted fracture pattern, often with significant microbial contamination of the wound;

Type IIIC: open fracture complicated by major vascular injury requiring surgical reconstruction, regardless of the extent of soft tissue damage.

For pediatric patients, the classification by Dai et al. has been proposed; the authors distinguish transverse, avulsion, and comminuted fractures in their classification. Avulsion fractures are characteristic of patients with incomplete skeletal growth. In avulsion fractures, there is a detachment of the cartilaginous model, which often includes the articular surface along with a small bone fragment [161]. Furthermore, literature shows that avulsion fractures can affect any part of the patella [163].

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

Clinical presentation of patellar fractures is characterized by severe pain in the knee joint area, joint dysfunction, smoothing of its contours and edema, and tenderness on palpation. In cases of significant displacement of bone fragments, soft tissue depression in the fracture zone may be observed. Axial load on the injured limb may not cause severe pain, but an attempt to flex the knee joint is accompanied by a sharp increase in pain. In transverse or comminuted patellar fractures, active extension of the lower leg may be impossible due to disruption of the extensor mechanism [25, 26, 27, 28].

Complaints: pain in the knee joint area, restricted range of motion in the knee joint, sharp pain upon flexion, and inability to extend the knee joint. Patients may complain of an increased volume of the knee joint, its deformation, and a feeling of instability of the injured lower limb in the knee joint area. In cases of open fractures, patients complain of pain in the wound area and bleeding [25, 26, 27, 28].

History: history of trauma; the patient describes a characteristic mechanism of injury.

The classic mechanism of injury is a direct blow to the patella or a fall onto a flexed knee joint. Less commonly, patellar fractures occur as a result of excessive contraction of the quadriceps femoris muscle [25, 26, 27, 28].

Objective examination: edema in the knee joint area, limitation of active and passive movements due to severe pain syndrome, visually detectable deformation of the knee joint, tenderness on palpation in the anterior knee joint area, crepitus of bone fragments, pathological mobility in the patella area, patellar tapotement (ballotement), and soft tissue depression in the patellar fracture area palpable upon fragment displacement. In open fractures, wounds are present in the knee joint area. A sign of an open patellar fracture is the presence of bone fragments in the wound, as well as the outflow of synovial fluid from the wound, given the presence of other signs of a patellar fracture [25, 26, 27, 28].

For pediatric patients, no conclusive data have been identified regarding differences in the clinical presentation of patellar fractures [164, 165].

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

Criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition:

  • anamnestic data: indication of a characteristic mechanism of lower limb injury (falling on the knee joint, a blow to the knee joint area, traffic accident, etc.);

  • physical examination data: impaired function of the injured segment, deformation, local edema, and tenderness of the injury area (pain increases with movements in the knee joint), presence of pathological mobility and/or fragment crepitus;

  • instrumental examination data: radiographic signs of fracture based on patellar radiography or knee joint radiography in 2 projections. For patellar fractures with suspected intra-articular involvement, additional computed tomography (CT) of the knee joint is recommended as prescribed by the on-duty or attending trauma surgeon/orthopedic surgeon or surgeon to clarify the nature of the fracture and determine the degree of fragment displacement.

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

In most cases, patients present with complaints described in section 1.6 "Clinical Presentation".

  • All patients with suspected patellar fractures are recommended a thorough collection of history and complaints regarding bone pathology for diagnostic purposes [1, 25-28].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

2.2 Physical Examination

Physical examination findings are described in section 1.6 "Clinical Presentation".

  • Patients with suspected bone fracture are recommended an initial consultation (examination, interview) by an orthopedic trauma surgeon for diagnostic purposes [1, 25-29, 191].

Level of Evidence 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: the medical history must record the results of:

- somatic status assessment;

- visual and palpation assessment of local status;

- blood pressure measurement (measurement of blood pressure in peripheral arteries);

- body temperature measurement (general thermometry);

-  assessment of the risk of venous thromboembolic complications (Appendix G1).

  • Patients with suspected bone fracture are recommended an assessment of innervation and blood circulation status in the distal lower extremity to rule out neurovascular bundle injury at the fracture level or compartment syndrome [1, 25-28].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

  • Patients with suspected bone fracture are recommended an assessment of soft tissue status and the degree of edema to rule out hematomas and open fractures [1, 25-28].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

  • When deciding on surgical treatment of a bone fracture in adult patients, it is recommended to take a history and ascertain complaints related to bone system pathology to identify risk factors and cardiovascular diseases [30, 31].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comment: cardiovascular disease risk factors include: arterial hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia (elevated total cholesterol >4.9 mmol/L and/or LDL cholesterol >3 mmol/L and/or HDL cholesterol in men <1.0 mmol/L, in women <1.2 mmol/L, and/or triglycerides >1.7 mmol/L), diabetes mellitus, and a family history of premature cardiovascular disease (<55 years for men and <65 years for women) [30]. Established cardiovascular disease is defined as: coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, chronic heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, valvular heart disease, and cardiomyopathies [31, 32].

  • All adult patients referred for elective surgical treatment of a bone fracture are recommended an assessment of the risk of perioperative cardiovascular complications, taking into account the type of planned bone fracture surgery, regardless of the presence of comorbid pathology, for the purpose of complication prevention [29, 33].

GPR CLOC 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

Comments: when performing surgical treatment for emergency (less than 6 hours) and urgent (6–24 hours) indications, perioperative risk assessment is not performed.

Minor orthopedic surgeries are associated with a low risk of cardiovascular complications (30-day risk of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death after surgery is less than 1%). Major orthopedic surgeries are associated with an intermediate (moderate) risk of cardiovascular complications (30-day risk of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death after surgery is 1–5%) [34].

  • To assess the risk of perioperative cardiovascular complications in adult patients, it is recommended to use a special algorithm (Appendix B2) [34].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • Elective surgical treatment of a bone fracture aimed at creating conditions for bone healing is recommended without additional workup in adult patients whose cardiovascular risk is assessed as low. In patients with intermediate or high perioperative risk of cardiovascular complications, it is recommended to assess the patient's functional status for the purpose of complication prevention [34, 36].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

  • All patients diagnosed with a bone fracture, if surgical treatment is planned, are recommended to undergo the following laboratory tests for diagnostic purposes [25, 37, 38, 39, 40, 202, 203, 207, 208]:

    - complete blood count;

    - urinalysis;

    - general clinical biochemical blood test: study of total bilirubin level in blood, blood urea level test, total blood protein level test, blood creatinine level test, blood glucose level test, determination of alanine aminotransferase activity in blood, determination of aspartate aminotransferase activity in blood;

    - determination of main ABO blood groups and D antigen of the Rhesus system (Rh factor);

    - coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis evaluation) with determination of the international normalized ratio (INR).

LEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • When deciding on surgical treatment of patellar fractures in adult patients, it is recommended to test the level of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in the blood in cases of intermediate or high risk of cardiovascular complications and low functional status to determine further management (see Appendix B2) [30, 34, 40, 41].

QOE 2Level of Evidence A (reliability of evidence level – 2).

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

  • In patients with suspected patellar fracture, it is recommended to perform radiography of the patella or radiography of the knee joint including the lower third of the femur and upper third of the tibia (lower extremity radiography) in two projections for diagnostic purposes [1, 18, 25-28, 42].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments. Knee radiographs in two projections are a mandatory examination as they allow visualization of the patella and surrounding bone structures [18, 42]. If a symmetrical high or low position of the patella is present compared to the contralateral limb, patella alta or baja is likely. Conversely, an asymmetric position of the patella suggests a rupture of the quadriceps tendon or patellar ligament, and this condition must be ruled out [18]. Diagnosis of patellar fractures with a fracture line located in the sagittal plane may be difficult when performing radiography in two standard projections. An axial view may be used to visualize this type of fracture, although knee flexion required for adequate axial visualization of the patella may cause significant discomfort to the patient [42].

Children have specific radiological features that must be taken into account at the diagnostic stage. The patella begins to ossify at the age of 3-5 years and is often represented by multiple ossification centers. In some cases, incomplete fusion of the superolateral ossification center is observed—a condition known as patella bipartita. This condition is often mistakenly interpreted as a patellar fracture [166]. Also, pediatric patients with Nail-patella syndrome exhibit a reduction in patellar size and delayed ossification, which can also create difficulties in diagnosing knee joint injuries in these patients [167]. Case series have been described in patients with the consequences of knee injuries manifested as the formation of ossifications within the proper patellar ligament. These changes can be similar in clinical presentation to avulsion fractures of the patella, which must be considered in differential diagnosis [168].

  • In all adult patients with patellar fractures, it is recommended to perform MSCT of the knee joint (computed tomography of the lower extremity, computed tomography of the joint) when a comminuted and/or intra-articular fracture is suspected to clarify the diagnosis [1, 18, 42, 43].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments. MSCT provides additional information on the nature of the fracture, the degree of fragment displacement, and the involvement of adjacent bone structures [1, 18, 42, 43].

  • In all adult patients with patellar fractures, if damage to the capsular-ligamentous apparatus of the knee joint or osteochondral patellar fracture is suspected, it is recommended to perform MRI of the knee joint (magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissues, magnetic resonance imaging of bone tissue (one region), magnetic resonance imaging of joints (one joint)) to clarify the diagnosis [18, 20].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended to record an electrocardiogram for the prevention of complications in all patients with patellar fractures older than 65 years, as well as in all adult patients with risk factors or established cardiovascular disease, regardless of age, if surgical treatment of the patellar fracture with an intermediate risk of cardiovascular complications is planned [34, 44].

Level of Evidence 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

It is recommended to record an electrocardiogram daily for 48 hours after emergency or urgent surgical treatment of patellar fractures in all patients older than 65 years, as well as in adult patients with established cardiovascular disease regardless of age, for the prevention of complications [45, 46].

Level of Evidence 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended to record an electrocardiogram daily for 48 hours after elective surgical treatment of patellar fractures for the prevention of complications in all adult patients in case of intermediate or high risk of cardiovascular complications and low functional status if the NT-proBNP level was not determined before surgery or its value exceeded 300 pg/ml (see Appendix B2 Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk of Surgery) [45, 47].

LEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • Echocardiography for the prevention of complications may be considered before planned surgical treatment of patellar fractures in adult patients with low functional status, elevated NT-proBNP levels, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, cardiomyopathies, heart defects, newly detected heart murmurs, and suspected cardiovascular disease [34, 48, 49].

Level of Evidence 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

2.5 Other Procedures

  • When treating patients with patellar fractures, it is recommended to consider the following indications for consultations with relevant specialists in clinical practice to rule out life- or health-threatening conditions:

    - initial neurosurgeon's appointment (examination, consultation): in case of nerve injury or suspected nerve injury and concomitant head injury;

    - initial surgeon's appointment (examination, consultation): in case of suspected or objectively diagnosed concomitant abdominal and/or chest injury; pediatric surgeon's appointment in case of suspected or objectively diagnosed concomitant abdominal and/or chest injury in pediatric patients;

    - initial neurologist's appointment (examination, consultation): in case of nerve injury or suspected nerve injury and concomitant head injury;

    - initial cardiovascular surgeon's appointment (examination, consultation): in case of concomitant vascular injury or suspected vascular injury;

    - initial general practitioner's appointment (examination, consultation) or initial pediatrician's appointment (examination, consultation): in the presence of comorbid therapeutic conditions (according to anamnesis) [25, 26, 50].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

  • If acute or unstable clinical conditions are detected (assessed according to Appendix G2. Revised Cardiac Risk Index rRCRI), in order to improve cardiac status and stabilize the patient's condition, it is recommended to postpone elective surgical treatment of the patellar fracture and transfer the patient to a regional vascular center or specialized cardiological department [34].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

3.1 Conservative Treatment

  • For patients with patellar fractures upon admission to the hospital, it is recommended to provide the following minimum scope of care in the emergency department to stabilize the general condition and prevent complications:

    - ensuring thermal comfort for the patient;

    - adequate pain management;

    - immobilization of the injured lower extremity;

    - correction of volemic and electrolyte disorders [25, 26, 38, 50].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • In patients with patellar fractures, it is recommended to apply a plaster cast for bone fractures or an immobilization bandage for bone fractures as part of conservative treatment in the following cases to achieve bone union:

    - stable patellar fracture without displacement;

    - stable patellar fracture with fragment displacement of less than 2–3 mm;

    - in the presence of comorbid pathology that is a contraindication to surgical treatment;

    - upon the patient's voluntary refusal of surgery [1, 25-28, 52, 169].

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

Comments. The criterion for patellar fracture stability is the absence of fragment displacement on control radiographs when flexing the knee joint up to 60°. According to studies, even comminuted patellar fractures can be managed conservatively if the fracture meets stability criteria [51, 52].

Immobilization (application of a plaster cast for bone fractures) of the knee joint as part of conservative treatment inevitably leads to an extended recovery period due to the development of contracture. To mitigate the negative effects of immobilization, it is necessary to create conditions for early functional movements in the knee joint. This can be achieved, in particular, by using a specialized orthosis that restricts knee flexion while allowing a gradual increase in the range of allowed motion. However, despite attempts to restore knee function during the fixation period in conservative treatment, knee contracture is frequently noted among complications due to fracture nonunion and/or prolonged immobilization. Furthermore, the persistence of even a minor residual displacement of bone fragments in the conservative treatment of patients with patellar fractures invariably leads to knee stiffness associated with incongruity of the articular surfaces of the patellofemoral joint [51].

3.2 Surgical Treatment

The majority of patellar fractures are intra-articular. Therefore, the goal of surgical treatment is to restore the anatomy of the articular surface and achieve stable fixation of bone fragments, thereby ensuring early rehabilitation. Additionally, osteosynthesis for patellar fractures without fragment displacement is performed according to social indications when it is necessary to shorten the rehabilitation period or avoid the need for prolonged immobilization [6].

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment in patients with patellar fractures to create conditions for fracture consolidation in the presence of the following indications:

- fragment displacement of 2 mm or more (diastasis);

- articular surface incongruity greater than 2 mm (articular step-off);

- osteochondral fractures with free intra-articular fragments;

- disruption of the extensor mechanism continuity at the base or apex of the patella with loss of active extension; open fractures of the proximal lower leg bones;

- patellar fractures as part of polytrauma;

- unsatisfactory results of conservative treatment [1, 25-28, 53, 169].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

  • Patients with patellar fractures are recommended osteosynthesis with Kirschner wires and a tension band wire or cannulated screws and a tension band wire to fix the patellar fragments and create conditions for bone healing [1, 18, 55, 56, 58, 65, 66].

Adults - Level of recommendation A (evidence level – 2).

Children — Strength of recommendation C (Evidence level — 5).

Comments: when performing osteosynthesis of the patella using Kirschner wires and a tension band wire or cannulated screws and a tension band wire, the following implants are used: non-absorbable non-sterile orthopedic bone screw***, non-absorbable sterile orthopedic bone screw***, dynamic bone screw***, absorbable orthopedic bone screw***, cannulated compression bone screw, orthopedic bone wires and pins***.

The method of bone fragment fixation in patellar fractures using a tension band is traditional and involves the use of metal wire and two Kirschner wires [1]. In 30% of cases following this technique, authors describe secondary displacement of bone fragments due to fixation instability or even complete fixation failure [55]. According to a study by K.L. Hsu et al. of surgical treatment outcomes in 170 patients using the tension band method, fixation failure occurred in 5.2% of cases, minor secondary fragment displacement was noted in 20% of observations, and infectious complications developed in 2.3% of cases [4].

Stable fixation of transverse patellar fractures requires interfragmentary compression using lag screws [51]. The use of cannulated lag screws placed perpendicularly to the fracture line, supplemented by an anterior tension band wire over the patella, achieves absolute stability. In this technique, the wire is passed through the channels within the screws [56]. S. Thelen et al. (2013) demonstrated the superiority of this technique over the traditional one regarding fixation stability and the prevention of secondary bone fragment displacement [57].

S. Gwinner et al. (2016) reported that patellar osteosynthesis using two cannulated screws with a tension band wire passed through them is preferable to single-screw osteosynthesis and the traditional Weber technique due to greater load-bearing stability. Furthermore, the authors noted less pronounced postoperative pain due to reduced soft tissue irritation by the hardware, which in turn promotes early rehabilitation without increasing the risk of secondary bone fragment displacement. These authors also permit the use of lag screws alone in the osteosynthesis of simple patellar fractures to minimize soft tissue trauma. They consider this surgical technique particularly preferable in cases where bone fragment reduction can be achieved closed and the screws inserted percutaneously through separate stab incisions [18]. The scientific literature describes methods of patellar fracture osteosynthesis using non-metallic fixators, including in combination with metal implants. Specifically, a number of surgeons have used polymer polyfilament sutures instead of orthopedic bone wire*** for patellar fracture fixation. The authors report a high proportion of patients in whom successful bone union of the patella was achieved [54, 58].

  • Patients with patellar fractures are recommended to undergo open plate osteosynthesis of the patella to fix patellar fragments and create conditions for bone healing [1, 6, 53, 54, 64].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments. When performing open plate osteosynthesis of the patella, the following implants are used: non-absorbable sterile bone fracture fixation plate with screws***, non-absorbable non-sterile bone fracture fixation plate with screws***, non-absorbable sterile orthopedic bone screw***, non-absorbable non-sterile orthopedic bone screw***.

Osteosynthesis with wires and a tension band wire (orthopedic bone wires and pins***) is not always effective. Its use in comminuted patellar fractures may be associated with poor radiological and, consequently, functional treatment outcomes for patients [54]. Therefore, fixation of patellar fractures can be performed using plates (non-absorbable sterile bone fracture fixation plate with screws***, non-absorbable non-sterile bone fracture fixation plate with screws***, non-absorbable sterile orthopedic bone screw***, non-absorbable non-sterile orthopedic bone screw***). The availability of plate implants for various patellar fracture locations allows for stable osteosynthesis of both simple and comminuted patellar fractures [55, 59, 60, 61]. Plate osteosynthesis is associated with better clinical outcomes, a lower complication rate, and shorter fracture consolidation times compared to wire and pin osteosynthesis in patellar fractures [64].

  • Patients with intra-articular bone defects are recommended the most accurate anatomical reconstruction of the articular surface in order to create conditions for bone healing [1, 4, 18, 55, 59].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • Patients with patellar fractures are recommended the use of external fixation devices to create conditions for fracture consolidation or temporary fragment fixation [62].

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

  • Patients with patellar fractures are recommended intraoperative fluoroscopic control during open plate osteosynthesis of the patella to monitor fragment reduction and implant positioning [1, 4, 27, 28, 55, 59].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • Patients with patellar fractures are recommended partial patellectomy (patellar resection, removal of the patella) in the presence of a comminuted fracture of the lower pole of the patella, provided that its osteosynthesis is impossible, in order to restore knee joint function and reduce pain [18, 20, 54].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: in the case of a comminuted fracture of the inferior pole of the patella with preservation of a large proximal fragment, achieving bone fragment reduction and stable fixation is difficult. In this case, partial patellectomy can be considered as a treatment method. However, partial resection of the inferior pole reduces the distance between the patella and the tibial tuberosity and may lead to a low-lying patella (patella baja), which is associated with increased patellar pressure on the femoral articular surface. This leads to anterior knee pain and contributes to the development of osteoarthritis [18, 63]. To maintain the functional integrity of the extensor mechanism, it is necessary to preserve the central part of the patella and two-thirds of the articular surface. To protect the reconstructed patellar tendon, a transosseous McLaughlin cerclage suture should be applied for 6 weeks [18]. Partial patellectomy is always preferable to total patellectomy [20].

  • Patients with patellar fractures are not recommended to undergo total patellectomy to restore knee function and eliminate pain if reconstructive surgery, reduction, and osteosynthesis are feasible [18, 20, 54].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: clinical outcomes following total patellectomy are predominantly unsatisfactory. Patients complain of anterior knee pain, leg weakness, knee instability, and lower limb "buckling". The biomechanical role of the patella in leg extension is recognized by surgeons, and therefore the efforts of the attending physician should be aimed at preserving the patella. Total patellectomy should be considered as an option only in the event of severe patellar osteomyelitis [18, 54].

3.2.4. Specifics of surgical treatment of patellar fractures in children.

  • In pediatric patients with displaced patellar fractures, surgical treatment is recommended: open reduction and fixation (bone fragment reduction, open fracture treatment with internal fixation, application of external fixation devices) to stabilize bone fragments and create conditions for bone union [165, 169].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: for transverse fractures, screw fixation or tension band wiring is recommended according to guidelines. For longitudinal fractures, screw fixation (arthroscopically assisted if technically feasible) is indicated. For avulsion fractures, fixation with transosseous sutures. Some studies have also mentioned partial patellectomy in displaced or comminuted patellar fractures with satisfactory postoperative results [165, 169].

3.3 Other Treatment

3.3.1. Postoperative analgesia

  • For adequate pain management in patients with patellar fractures, it is recommended to use multimodal analgesia, which may include NSAIDs from group M01A (Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids), paracetamol**, gabapentinoids, and immediate-release opioids, taking into account age restrictions in the instructions for medical use; if administration is impossible, monomodality should be used [68-69, 193]. Recommended medications with analgesic effects are listed in Appendices A3.1–A3.3.

For NSAIDs, antirheumatic products, and paracetamol**, gabapentinoids: Level of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 1).

For opioids: Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: adequate pain relief must be provided to the patient with a fracture prior to any manipulations and throughout the entire period of fracture treatment, the duration of which varies significantly depending on the chosen management strategy. When providing pain management in an inpatient setting, orders executed at the emergency medical care stage must be taken into account. In the acute period of trauma, to ensure proper pain control, the patient must be provided with adequate fragment immobilization using a vacuum splint, vacuum mattress, or external fixation device (Kit of components, parts, and tools for assembling external fixation devices for bone fractures).

Among pharmacological strategies, the current consensus is the use of multimodal analgesia (MMA), which involves the use of several analgesic drugs (opioids from group N02A Opioids and non-opioids from groups N02B Other analgesics and antipyretics, M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids) with different mechanisms of action, alongside non-pharmacological interventions aimed at affecting the peripheral and/or central parts of the nervous system [70]. This combination allows for more effective pain relief by enhancing the effects of various drugs, which in most cases leads to a decrease in the frequency of prescription and/or doses of opioid analgesics from group N02A Opioids. Thus, MMA improves the risk profile of each drug while providing synergistic pain control using different drug classes. Postoperative MMA may include psychotherapy, physical therapy, NSAIDs, paracetamol**, gabapentinoids, regional anesthesia (single-shot injection or peripheral nerve catheter placement), local injections, and opioids [68].

In modern scientific literature, authors emphasize the use of the lowest effective doses of opioids for the shortest possible duration, avoiding extended-release opioids. As an adjuvant during MMA for adult patients, a single intravenous administration of #dexamethasone** 1.25–20 mg prior to surgery (60 minutes before the incision) can be used, which provides a significant reduction in pain [67].

It must be remembered that the duration of parenteral administration of most NSAIDs (ketorolac**, ketoprofen**, diclofenac**) is limited to two days, which requires timely switching of the patient to oral administration, changing the drug, or coordinating further use with the medical commission. The specific choice of local anesthesia method and medicinal products is made by the attending physician individually in accordance with the patient's characteristics, local protocols, and the equipment of the medical organization.

When prescribing analgesic therapy for children, a single dose should be chosen taking into account the child's weight and age. Preference should be given to analgesics with oral or rectal administration routes, avoiding intramuscular injections.

  • In children with patellar fractures, the use of paracetamol** and ibuprofen** is recommended for analgesia [193, 193]. The recommended dosage regimen and age restrictions in accordance with the instructions for medical use are given in Appendix A3.3.

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

  • In cases of severe pain and ineffectiveness of paracetamol** and ibuprofen** in children, the use of other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (M01A) and narcotic analgesics from the opioid group (N02A) is recommended if there are relevant indications and no contraindications [193].

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

  • Patients with patellar fractures are recommended to undergo local blockade or regional anesthesia as part of a postoperative multimodal regimen for pain management [204, 205].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

3.3.2. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis

  • In the surgical treatment of patients with closed patellar fractures, it is recommended to perform surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) of surgical site infection with a single preoperative administration of an antibacterial drug to reduce the risk of infectious complications [72-73].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments. In accordance with international clinical guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections [74, 72], the objective of SAP is to achieve bactericidal concentrations of the antibacterial drug in tissues exposed to microbial contamination during surgery to prevent surgical site infections. The need for SAP is determined by the surgical wound class of the upcoming operation: SAP is not required for "clean" surgical wounds not associated with the placement of orthopedic implants and metal hardware. SAP should be performed: for clean-contaminated and contaminated surgical wounds; for "clean" surgical wounds involving the placement of orthopedic implants and metal hardware. For infected ("dirty") wounds, SAP is not indicated; antibiotic therapy is administered instead.

  • In patients with patellar fractures, it is recommended to use first- and second-generation cephalosporins (cefazolin**, cefuroxime**) as the primary medications for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis during surgical interventions in traumatology and orthopedics; as an alternative in case of beta-lactam antibiotic intolerance—glycopeptide antibiotics (vancomycin**), lincosamides (#clindamycin**) [72]. All medicinal products are prescribed in accordance with age restrictions in the instructions for medical use.

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments. For patients with an unremarkable allergic history and no significant risk factors for methicillin-resistant staphylococcal carriage, first-generation (J01DB) and second-generation (J01DC) cephalosporins (cefazolin**, cefuroxime**) are used for surgical site infection prophylaxis; they are administered intravenously 30 to 60 minutes before the skin incision. In case of beta-lactam allergy, vancomycin** should be prescribed, administered over at least 60 minutes starting the IV infusion 2 hours before the incision, or #clindamycin**. In patients with significant risk factors for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus (MRS) carriage, the prophylaxis regimen must include an antibacterial agent with anti-MRS activity (vancomycin**). In most cases, a single preoperative dose of the antibacterial agent is sufficient for effective prophylaxis. For prolonged procedures or massive blood loss, an additional intraoperative dose of the antibacterial agent should be administered (the approximate timing for intraoperative administration is two half-lives after the preoperative dose). Administration of the antibacterial agent after wound closure in the operating room is inappropriate, even in the presence of established drains.

Single doses of main antibacterial agents for surgical site infection prophylaxis in adult traumatology and orthopedic procedures: cefazolin** 2 g (for patients weighing ≥120 kg — 3 g), cefuroxime** 1.5 g, #clindamycin** 900 mg, vancomycin** 15 mg/kg as a slow IV infusion [72].

Single doses for children should be calculated based on actual body weight in accordance with the enclosed product information: cefazolin** 30–50 mg/kg, cefuroxime** 50 mg/kg, #clindamycin** 10 mg/kg, vancomycin 15 mg/kg; the use of fluoroquinolones during the period of bone and joint system development in the presence of unclosed growth plates is contraindicated due to the risk of arthropathy [72, 132].

It is recommended to administer antibacterial therapy for no more than 72 hours after wound closure in patients with open fractures of the extremities to reduce the risk of infectious complications [194].

GPR CLOC 2Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 2).

Comments. In open fractures, prophylactic administration of antibacterial agents is effective in preventing early infection. The antibacterial agent should be administered as soon as possible after the injury. Cefazolin** is the antibacterial agent of choice; however, in patients with open high-energy fractures with bone displacement and segmental loss, major vascular injury, or heavily contaminated wounds, it is advisable to broaden the spectrum of prescribed antibacterial agents to cover gram-negative pathogens. In such cases, adult patients may be considered for the addition of #gentamicin** (at a dose of 6 mg/kg intravenously once daily) to cefazolin** [76, 77]. An alternative to this combination is #ampicillin + sulbactam** (at a dose of 3.0 g intravenously every 8 hours for 3 days) [78], with the latter being particularly relevant in cases involving the risk of clostridial infection. According to the majority of researchers, in Gustilo-Anderson type III open fractures, antibacterial agents should not be continued for more than 72 hours after soft tissue wound closure [79].

  • During the surgical treatment of patients with extremity fractures, it is recommended to perform surgical site infection prophylaxis lasting no more than 24 hours [80].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments. In accordance with the regulatory documentation in force in the Russian Federation (SanPiN 3.3686-21) and clinical guidelines [80], to achieve an effective concentration of the antibacterial agent in tissues and blood serum at the time of the skin incision, antibacterial agents for surgical site infection prophylaxis should be administered intravenously 30 to 60 minutes before the skin incision, or within 2 hours before the incision in the case of vancomycin**. The maximum duration of prophylactic antibacterial administration must not exceed 24 hours after the end of surgery. In most cases, a single dose of the antibacterial agent is sufficient for effective prophylaxis. Additional doses should be administered during prolonged surgeries when the half-life of the administered antibacterial agent has elapsed since the preoperative dose, creating a risk of the antibacterial concentration dropping below the bactericidal level and increasing the risk of surgical site infections.

3.3.3. Prevention of venous thromboembolic events

It is recommended to assess the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) for prophylaxis purposes in all patients with extremity fractures scheduled for surgical treatment, based on individual deep vein thrombosis (DVT) risk factors and the risk level of the planned surgery [81, 82, 195].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • In all patients with fractures and subsequent extremity osteosynthesis, in the absence of active bleeding, it is recommended to implement VTE prophylaxis measures until the patient's normal or expected mobility is restored [195, 196].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments. Patients with extremity fractures may belong to the moderate or high VTE risk group, depending on patient characteristics, the nature of the sustained trauma (multiple and polytrauma carry a higher risk of DVT), and the anticipated duration of surgery.

To assess the risk of VTE before surgery, it is advisable to use Caprini VTE risk scoring scales (Appendix G1).

Non-pharmacological means of VTE prophylaxis include:

- elastic and/or intermittent sequential pneumatic compression of the lower extremities;

- early mobilization and activation of the patient;

- therapeutic exercises.

All patients with limited mobility, regardless of the degree of VTE risk, are recommended to receive mechanical VTE prophylaxis [82]. All patients with a moderate or high risk of VTE are recommended to receive pharmacological VTE prophylaxis, generally until normal or expected mobility is restored.

Pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in the preoperative period is performed with unfractionated heparin (UFH, sodium heparin**) from the B01AB heparin group or, preferably, with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) from the B01AB heparin group (Appendices A3.3, A3.4).

  • Patients receiving chronic antithrombotic therapy from group B01 who present with a patellar fracture are recommended to undergo VTE prophylaxis and anesthesia based on specialized guidelines [81, 87].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

  • In patients with patellar fractures undergoing conservative treatment and limb immobilization, it is recommended to initiate pharmacological VTE prophylaxis immediately after ruling out ongoing bleeding to prevent complications [81].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments. LMWHs are the drugs of choice; in their absence, UFH should be used. Subsequently, from days 3–4 depending on the patient's condition, adult patients may be switched to vitamin K antagonists (B01AA) (warfarin**) provided there is adequate dose titration and regular INR monitoring [81].

Features of thromboprophylaxis in pediatric patients

  • Hospitalized patients older than 6 months are recommended to undergo bleeding and VTE risk assessment within 24 hours of admission [88] and periodically during their hospital stay [89–91].

Leveled Recommendation CLevel of Evidence 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments. No validated VTE risk assessment scales have been developed for pediatric patients, nor have bleeding risk assessment scales for patients receiving anticoagulants; therefore, when deciding on VTE prophylaxis, individual bleeding risk factors (Appendix A3.6), VTE risk factors (Appendix A3.7), and the risk-benefit ratio should be considered [92, 94].

For VTE prophylaxis in children, mechanical and pharmacological methods are used.

  • Pediatric patients at high risk for VTE are recommended to be considered for prophylactic doses of UFH or LMWHs from the B01AB group [89, 91, 195].

CER CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood/Credibility of Evidence – 5).

Comments. Specific criteria for assessing the risk of thromboembolic events in children with traumatic injuries are lacking. Important criteria include a history of thrombosis and thromboembolism, blood coagulation disorders, and central venous catheter placement.

3.3.4. Blood-conserving technologies

It is recommended that adult patients at risk of bleeding during extremity fracture surgery receive perioperative tranexamic acid** (intravenous solution), taking into account age restrictions in accordance with the instructions for medical use, for the purpose of bleeding prevention [100, 160, 148].

GOR ALE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2).

It is recommended that adult patients who have undergone surgery for patellar fractures be prescribed iron supplements in the postoperative period, as clinically indicated, to correct their general condition [103].

GPPLE 2Strong Recommendation Grade based on Level 2 Evidence (Grade of recommendation A, Level of evidence – 2).

Comments. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses demonstrate that the perioperative use of parenteral ferric iron preparations (B03AC), specifically ferric carboxymaltose**, in adult orthopedic trauma patients, particularly in the postoperative period, is an effective alternative to blood transfusion, as it reduces the proportion of patients receiving blood transfusions, decreases the volume of packed red blood cells transfused, and reduces the incidence of infectious complications, although it does not affect mortality rates [103, 104].

3.3.5. Tetanus prophylaxis

It is recommended that patients with open patellar fractures receive tetanus toxoid** for tetanus prophylaxis, taking into account age restrictions [125, 165], or tetanus antitoxin**, or human tetanus immunoglobulin, taking into account age restrictions [105, 106, 165, 166].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: in accordance with clauses 4156-4157 of the Sanitary Rules and Norms on the Prevention of Infectious Diseases (SanPiN 3.3686-21), emergency tetanus prophylaxis is performed for any injuries involving a breach of the skin and mucous membranes. Emergency tetanus prophylaxis is administered up to the 20th calendar day from the moment of injury [105, 165]. The prescription of drugs for emergency tetanus immunoprophylaxis (vaccines for tetanus prevention (J07AM), specific immunoglobulins (J06BB)) is carried out differentially depending on the presence of documentary confirmation of a preventive vaccination or data from immunological monitoring of anti-tetanus immunity levels, as well as taking into account the nature of the injuries.

Emergency tetanus immunoprophylaxis is carried out, taking into account age restrictions, in the form of:

- passive immunization or seroprophylaxis with human tetanus immunoglobulin, or in its absence, tetanus antitoxin**, taking into account age restrictions;

- active-passive prophylaxis, consisting of the simultaneous administration into different anatomical sites of human tetanus immunoglobulin (or in its absence, tetanus antitoxin**) and tetanus toxoid** (TT);

- emergency revaccination with tetanus toxoid** (or diphtheria-tetanus toxoid with reduced antigen content** - DT-toxoid-M) to stimulate immunity in previously vaccinated individuals [124, 125, 165].

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

Currently, the literature presents patellar fracture rehabilitation protocols proposed by individual authors without evidence of their effectiveness, neither in terms of recovery timelines and return to work, nor in terms of complication rates, nor regarding the duration of individual rehabilitation stages.

The selection of rehabilitation means and methods is based on general knowledge about the negative consequences of prolonged joint immobilization and the general principles of restoring joint function based on the mechanisms of action of various physical therapy (PT) modalities and physiotherapeutic factors.

However, further high-quality studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of various rehabilitation concepts.

All patients undergoing conservative and surgical treatment for patellar fractures are recommended to have a consultation with a physical and rehabilitation medicine physician (initial evaluation (examination, consultation) by a physical therapy physician, examination (consultation) by a physical therapist).

It is recommended during conservative and surgical treatment of patellar fractures to carry out staged rehabilitation aimed at restoring the function (full flexion and extension) of the knee joint, thigh muscle strength, weight-bearing capacity of the leg, general motor activity, and improving the patient's quality of life. Rehabilitation is planned and carried out by a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team (MDRT) and begins within the first 48 hours of hospital admission [173, 179, 181, 187, 197, 198].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: in conservative treatment, rehabilitation for patients with patellar fractures begins immediately after fracture fixation and continues until fracture consolidation is complete. The duration of the immobilization period averages 4 to 8 weeks. After immobilization is removed, it is recommended to conduct rehabilitation in outpatient medical rehabilitation departments or a day hospital, which corresponds to the third stage of rehabilitation. The duration of functional recovery ranges from 8 weeks to 3 months [177, 179, 181, 182, 183, 184, 200].

Rehabilitation after surgical treatment begins immediately after surgery (early rehabilitation) and, as clinically indicated, can continue in the inpatient rehabilitation department until discharge from the hospital (inpatient rehabilitation stage). The need for postoperative immobilization is decided by the operating surgeon depending on the stability of the fracture fixation.

The period of early and inpatient rehabilitation lasts on average 14 days after surgery. This is followed by a period of outpatient rehabilitation, which is divided into the early recovery period (2-3 weeks) and the late recovery period – the subsequent 2-3 weeks [177, 179, 181, 182, 184, 186, 201].

It is recommended in cases of patellar fracture to personalize treatment according to the fracture type, trauma management method, and the patient's general health status [173, 177, 179, 180, 189].

GGR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: there is no current consensus on the rehabilitation of patients with patellar fractures, nor are there comparative studies that would allow for greater certainty regarding the method of fracture immobilization, the recommended orthosis, or the duration of the immobilization phase; the angle at which the knee joint is fixed, the timing for initiating knee joint mobilization, and axial loading on the limb. Rehabilitation protocols are developed by the PRM physician in conjunction with the operating surgeon. During the inpatient, outpatient, and day-care rehabilitation stages, rehabilitation is carried out by an MDRT.

It is recommended during the period of immobilization in conservative treatment of patellar fractures to perform home rehabilitation according to an individualized program drawn up by a PRM physician, aimed at minimizing the effects of hypodynamia, improving blood circulation in the limb, reducing edema, and mitigating the negative impact of immobilization on knee joint mobility and muscle dysfunction, as well as training in locomotion with assistive devices and self-care skills [179, 181, 182, 183, 184, 201].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments. In the conservative treatment of patellar fractures, a plaster cast or hinged orthosis is applied to immobilize the knee joint in extension [180, 184, 185, 189]. Following consultation, the PRM physician develops a rehabilitation program (patient guide) with recommendations for the motor regimen and physical exercises in accordance with the goals and objectives of the immobilization period [179, 181, 182, 183, 184]. The following are prescribed:

- local cryotherapy (A24.01.005.01),

- corrective positioning (elevated position of the limb) A23.30.017.002,

- individual therapeutic exercise sessions for injuries and diseases of the musculoskeletal system (isometric contraction of the thigh and leg muscles, active movements in the ankle and hip joints) A19.03.002.001,

- gait training with axillary crutches as an assistive device A14.30.018.

The duration of the period is determined jointly with the traumatologist and is up to 4–8 weeks. Rehabilitation is performed independently at home or via a telemedicine program under the online supervision of MDRT specialists.

Outpatient rehabilitation (day hospital) is recommended, which is carried out by the MDRT according to the post-immobilization period program aimed at restoring knee joint function, muscle strength, joint stability, limb weight-bearing capacity, correct gait stereotype, and household adaptation [177, 179, 181, 182, 183, 189].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: after the removal of immobilization, the PRM physician draws up an individualized rehabilitation program, the main task of which in the first two weeks is to improve joint mobility up to a range of 30 degrees, in the subsequent 2-3 weeks up to 60 degrees, and thereafter up to 90 degrees. Once knee joint flexion reaches 60 degrees, strengthening of the thigh muscles is initiated [175, 179, 184, 185, 182].

Axial load on the limb is permitted no earlier than 6 weeks after the fracture [174, 81].

Physical exercises of various orientations are the primary means of rehabilitation, whereas physiotherapeutic methods are of secondary importance.

To restore knee flexion/extension, exercise therapy (LFT) for joint trauma in phase 2 (lightened dynamic exercises) (A19.04.001.027), corrective positioning A23.30.017.002, motorized mechanotherapy (A19.30.006), and robotic mechanotherapy (A19.30.006.001) are prescribed,

To improve blood circulation in the limb and normalize muscle tone: hydrokinesiotherapy for bone fractures (A19.03.003.0239), manual lower limb massage (A21.01.009.01), and hardware pneumatic massage (A21.01.001.008).

Upon achieving 90 degrees of knee flexion, following a repeat consultation with a physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) physician, the following are prescribed to restore thigh muscle strength and endurance, neuromuscular connections, and coordination: exercise therapy for joint trauma in phase 3 (dynamic exercises with resistance and weights, static exercises) (A19.04.001.003), mechanotherapy for bone fractures (A19.03.003.003), biofeedback training for musculoskeletal injuries and diseases (A19.04.001.014), balance therapy (A19.30.006.001), and restoration of normal gait pattern.

Recommended for the surgical treatment of patellar fractures is early rehabilitation according to the early postoperative period program, which is prescribed and carried out by the multidisciplinary rehabilitation team (MDRT) starting from the first day after surgery to reduce pain and edema, improve blood circulation in the limb, and teach crutch-assisted walking [177, 179, 181, 182, 184, 186, 197, 198].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: within the first 48 hours after surgery a consultation with a PRM physician is performed, who determines an individual rehabilitation program prescribing: exercise therapy in the early postoperative period for the musculoskeletal system, individually (isometric exercises for the thigh and lower leg muscles, dynamic exercises for the ankle joint, exercises for healthy limbs) (A19.04.001.038), local cryotherapy for the first 24 hours (A24.01.005.01), corrective positioning (elevated limb position) A23.30.017.002, low-intensity pulsed electrostatic field therapy (A17.30.038), and training in standing up and crutch-assisted walking (A14.30.018).

Upon discharge from the hospital on days 3-5 after surgery, the PRM physician compiles a patient guide to continue rehabilitation at home. Depending on the nature of the surgical intervention, wearing a functional orthosis for up to 14 days and crutch-assisted walking are recommended.

Instructions for wearing an orthosis after surgery are contradictory, ranging from recommendations to wear it 24 hours a day for 3-6 weeks (removing it only for showering), to sometimes recommending wearing the brace only during the day, or only when walking and standing. There is no evidence on which is better. The more complex and unstable the fracture, the more time is required for orthosis wear and knee joint motion restriction. It is generally not recommended to bend the knee more than 90 degrees for 6 weeks [174, 178, 186, 182, 188, 189].

Gradual, unforced knee flexion up to an angle of 30 degrees, achieved over 2 weeks, is added to the previously performed exercises.

Weight-bearing on the operated leg is permitted from the first day after surgery, guided by pain sensation. This means that walking with additional crutch support is allowed, gradually increasing the load on the operated leg depending on pain. Walking without crutch support is permissible after 6 weeks.

Recommended for adult patients with surgical treatment of patellar fractures is outpatient rehabilitation, conducted by the MDRT to restore knee joint function, limb weight-bearing capacity, workability, and quality of life [177, 179, 181, 182, 184, 186, 190, 192, 197, 198].

GRL CLEL 4Recommendation Grade C (Level of Evidence – 4).

Comments: there is no single rehabilitation protocol, but it has been proven that rehabilitation improves the functional outcomes of surgical treatment and accelerates the recovery of the patient's quality of life [173, 177, 180, 201].

Most protocols recommend early gentle mobilization of the knee joint and full axial load in an orthosis fixed in extension. Flexion is allowed up to 30 degrees within 2 weeks after surgery. Some authors assert the necessity of immobilization for 3-6 weeks after surgery, while others consider this an unnecessary restriction [174, 175, 177, 179, 181, 197, 198].

However, the goals of rehabilitation are to restore knee joint mobility and strengthen the muscles. This is achieved through the gradual use of isometric, isotonic, and isokinetic exercises. Thus, the range of motion of the knee joint is gradually increased and restored, pain is reduced, and the weight-bearing capacity of the limb is restored.

At the outpatient stage, the PRM physician draws up an individual rehabilitation program prescribing:

Exercise therapy for joint trauma in phases 1 and 2 individually (A19.04.001.026, A19.04.001.027), in phase 3 (A19.04.001.029), mechanotherapy for bone fractures (A19.03.003.003), biofeedback training for musculoskeletal injuries and diseases (A19.04.001.014), balance therapy (A19.30.006.001), and restoration of normal gait pattern.

Local cryotherapy (A24.01.005.01), hydrokinesiotherapy for bone fractures (A19.03.003.023), manual lower limb massage (A21.01.009.01), hardware pneumatic massage (A21.01.001.008), and therapeutic underwater jet massage (A20.30.010) may be prescribed according to indications.

Crutch-assisted walking training is performed in the presence of pain syndrome and joint swelling.

After 2-4 weeks, the following are prescribed: therapeutic exercise using apparatus and exercise machines for bone fractures (A19.03.003.022), including active dynamic exercises with resistance and weights, static exercises to strengthen thigh muscles; mechanotherapy on motorized or pneumatic mechanotherapy devices for bone fractures (A19.03.003.010, A19.03.003.008), mechanotherapy for bone fractures (A19.03.003.003), robotic mechanotherapy for bone fractures (A19.03.003.004), and support-reaction biofeedback training for bone fractures (A19.03.003.014).

Indications exist for the use of thigh muscle electrical stimulation (A21.31.011), ultraphonophoresis for joint diseases (A22.23.003.002), and low-level laser therapy (A22.02.001) [174, 197].

Full weight-bearing on the limb is permitted no earlier than 3 months after surgery, based on comfort and tolerance. Daily activity is restored in 6-8 weeks. Sports activities are recommended to resume no earlier than 4 months [2, 5, 7, 105, 201].

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

Prevention of proximal lower leg fractures consists in citizens observing social safety rules when performing household chores, staying in traffic zones, walking on poor-quality surfaces, and during icy conditions.

A significant share of responsibility in fracture prevention also belongs to state structures, which are obligated to ensure safety to prevent road traffic injuries, as well as to ensure compliance with safety regulations in industries with increased risk of injury.

  • Due to the potential risk of complications after treatment, all patients with patellar fractures following discharge from the hospital are recommended to undergo follow-up monitoring by an orthopedic traumatologist to assess functional recovery and rehabilitation [1, 25, 206].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: after discharge from the hospital, the patient must be referred to a trauma center or outpatient trauma department with an indication of the treatment performed and detailed recommendations for the continuation of treatment and rehabilitation. This will ensure continuity between the inpatient and outpatient stages of treatment.

Follow-up examinations with radiographs (lower limb radiography) and assessment of functional recovery dynamics are performed at 6 weeks post-surgery (assessment of fracture consolidation degree and possibility of full weight-bearing on the limb), 12 weeks post-surgery (assessment of fracture consolidation degree and possibility of weight-bearing on the limb), 24 weeks post-surgery (assessment of consolidation degree, assessment of functional recovery dynamics), and 1 year post-surgery (assessment of functional treatment outcome and decision on the need and timing for implant removal).

6. Organization of Medical Care

Clinical application of recommendations: Traumatology and Orthopedics, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Medical Rehabilitation, Health Organization and Public Health.

Purpose of the clinical guidelines: The clinical guidelines were developed to improve the quality of medical care and standardize diagnostic and treatment algorithms for patients with patellar fractures.

Indications for planned hospitalization:

- the presence of a displaced patellar fracture in the patient, detected during follow-up examinations by an outpatient traumatologist;

- unsatisfactory result of conservative treatment: secondary displacement of fragments, absence of signs of fracture union after conservative treatment; secondary displacement or migration of implants after osteosynthesis [1, 25-28].

Indications for emergency hospitalization:

Patients with suspected or confirmed patellar fracture must be referred to a hospital to determine the need for emergency hospitalization. Indications for emergency hospitalization include:

  • patellar fracture with fragment displacement;

  • open patellar fracture;

  • gunshot fracture of the knee joint region;

  • patellar fracture accompanied by major vascular and nerve injuries;

  • patellar fracture as part of polytrauma [1, 25-28].

Indications for emergency hospitalization in patellar fracture are determined based on:

1) the presence of patient complaints characteristic of a patellar fracture;

2) the presence of characteristic clinical signs of a patellar fracture;

3) the presence of radiological signs of a patellar fracture in the patient.

Indications for patient discharge from the hospital:

  1. Internal fixation of the fracture was performed using hardware (using the following implants: non-absorbable non-sterile orthopedic bone screw***, non-absorbable sterile orthopedic bone screw***, dynamic bone screw***, absorbable orthopedic bone screw***, cannulated compression bone screw***, orthopedic bone pins and wire***, non-absorbable sterile bone fixation screw plate***, non-absorbable non-sterile bone fixation screw plate***) or stabilization with an external fixation device using the following implants: set of assemblies, parts, and instruments for assembling external fixation devices for bone fractures***, or adequate plaster immobilization was performed during conservative treatment;

  2. Phase I rehabilitation was performed;

  3. No acute infectious process is present;

  4. Refusal of the patient or their legal guardians in case of legally established incapacity of the patient to continue inpatient treatment (the reason for refusal must be recorded in the medical chart with the personal signature of the patient or their guardians).

7. Additional Information

No additional information is required.

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

№

Quality criteria

Performance evaluation

1

Initial outpatient visit (examination, consultation) by an adult traumatologist-orthopedist and/or initial outpatient visit (examination, consultation) by a surgeon (pediatric surgeon) for children with suspected patellar fracture

Yes/no

2

Radiography of the patella or radiography of the knee joint including the lower third of the femur and upper third of the leg (lower extremity radiography) in two projections performed for suspected patellar fracture

Yes/no

3

Anesthesia was performed (in the absence of medical contraindications).

Yes/no

4

Computed tomography of the lower extremity / computed tomography of the joint (for intra-articular fractures)

Yes/no

5

Application of a plaster cast for bone fractures or application of an immobilization bandage for bone fractures as part of conservative treatment of a patient with a patellar fracture, and/or application of an external fixation device (application of external fixation devices) for patellar fractures, and/or open internal plate osteosynthesis of the patella for patellar fractures

Yes/no

References

Show references
  1. Buckley R.E., Moran C.G., Apivatthakakul T. AO principles of fracture management. 3rd ed. Stuttgart etc: Thieme Medical Publ., 2018. 1060 p.

  2. Meinberg E.G., Agel J., Roberts C.S. et al. Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J. Orthop. Trauma. 2018; 32 (Suppl. 1): S1-S170.

  3. Human Anatomy. In two volumes. Vol. 1 / Ed. by M.R. Sapin. 5th ed., rev. and supp. Moscow: Medicina, 640 p.

  4. Hsu K.L., Chang W.L., Yang C.Y., Yeh M.L., Chang C.W. Factors affecting the outcomes of modified tension band wiring techniques in transverse patellar fractures. Injury. 2017. vol. 48. no. 12. P.2800-2806. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.10.016.

  5. Seijas R., Sallent A., Rivera E., Ares O. Patellar fractures. J Invest Surg. 2019. vol. 32. no. 6. P.571-572. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2018.1457743.

  6. Byun S., Sim J., Joo Y., Kim J.W., Choi W., Na Y.G., Shon O. Changes in patellar fracture characteristics: A multicenter retrospective analysis of 1596 patellar fracture cases between 2003 and 2017. Injury. 2019. vol. 50. P. 2287-2291. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.016

  7. Zderic I., Stoffelb K., Sommerd C., Höntzsche D., Gueorguiev B. Biomechanical evaluation of the tension band wiring principle. A comparison between two different techniques for transverse patella fracture fixation. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured. 2017. vol. 48. P.1749-1757. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.037.

  8. Lazaro L.E., Wellman D.S., Sauro G., Pardee N.C., Berkes M.B., Little M.T.M., Nguyen J.T., Helfet D.L., Lorich D.G. Outcomes after operative fixation of complete articular patellar fractures: assessment of functional impairment. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2013. vol. 95. P.1-8.DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00012.

  9. Schuett D.J., Hake M.E., Mauffrey C., Hammerberg E.M., Stahel P.F., Hak D.J. Current treatment strategies for patella fractures. Orthopedics. 2015. vol. 38. P.377-384. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150603-05.

  10. Bauer KL: Osteochondral injuries of the knee in pediatric patients. J Knee Surg 2018;31:382-391.

  11. Matthewson MH, Dandy DJ: Osteochondral fractures of the lateral femoral condyle: A result of indirect violence to the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1978;60-B:199-202.

  12. Seeley MA, Knesek M, Vanderhave KL: Osteochondral injury after acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop 2013;33:511-518.

  13. Kennedy JC, Grainger RW, McGraw RW: Osteochondral fractures of the femoral condyles. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1966;48:436-440.

  14. Fabricant PD, Yen YM, Kramer DE, et al.: Fixation of traumatic chondral-only fragments of the knee in pediatric and adolescent athletes: A retrospective multicenter report. Orthop J Sports Med 2018;6:2325967117753140.

  15. Nietosvaara Y, Aalto K, Kallio PE: Acute patellar dislocation in children: Incidence and associated osteochondral fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 1994;14:513-515.

  16. Stanitski CL, Paletta GA: Articular cartilage injury with acute patellar dislocation in adolescents. Arthroscopic and radiographic correlation. Am J Sports Med 1998;26:52-55

  17. Baghdadi S, Mortazavi SJ, Kaseb M, Ayati M: Missed transient patellar dislocation in younger patients with traumatic knee injuries. J Orthop Spine Trauma;2016;2.

  18. Gwinner C., Märdian S., Schwabe P., Schaser K.D., Krapohl B.D., Jung T.M. Current concepts review: Fractures of the patella. GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2016. vol. 5. URL: https://www.egms.de/static/en/journals/iprs/2016-5/iprs000080.shtml (accessed: Feb 8, 2025) DOI: 10.3205/iprs000080.

  19. Zagorodniy N.V., Khijazin V.Kh., Abdulkhabirov M.A., Solod E.I., Futryk A.B. Patellar fractures and their treatment: teaching aid. Moscow: RUDN University, 2017. 44 p.

  20. Mehling I, Mehling A, Rommens PM. Comminuted patellar fractures. Curr Orthop. 2006;20(6):397-404. doi: 10.1016/j.cuor.2006.11.004.

  21. Speck M, Regazzoni P. Klassifikation der Patellafrakturen [Classification of patellar fractures]. Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed. 1994;87(1):27-30. German.

  22. Rogge D, Oestern HJ, Gossé F. Die Patellafraktur. Therapie und Ergebnisse [Patella fracture. Therapy and results]. Orthopade. 1985;14(4):266-80. German.

  23. Gustilo R.B., Anderson J.T. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J. Bone Joint Surg. Amer. 1976; 58 (4): 453-458. 

  24. Gustilo R.B., Mendoza R.M., Williams D.N. Problems in the management of type III (severe) open fractures: a new classification of type III open fractures. J. Trauma. 1984; 24 (8): 742-746.

  25. Traumatology. National Guidelines. 4th ed. Edited by Academician of the RAS G.P. Kotelnikov, Academician of the RAS S.P. Mironov. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2022. 784 p.

  26. Traumatology and Orthopedics / Ed. by N.V. Kornilov, A.K. Dulaev. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2020. 655 p.

  27. Azar F.M., Canale S.T., Beaty J.H. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 14th ed. Elsevier; Mosby, 2020: 2852-2862.

  28. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults /Ed. By Ch.M. Court-Brown, J.D. Heckman, M.M. McQueen et al. 8th ed. Wolters Kluwer Health, 2015. 2769 p.

  29. Bozhkova S.A., Bulanov A.Yu., Vavilova T.V. et al. National Standard of the Russian Federation GOST R 56377-2015 "Clinical guidelines (treatment protocols) for the prevention of thromboembolic syndromes". Probl. Standartizatsii v Zdravookhr. 2015; (7-8): 28-68.

  30. Halvorsen S., Mehilli J., Cassese S. et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur. Heart J. 2022; 43(39): 3826-3924.

  31. Botto F., Alonso-Coello P., Chan M.T. et al. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2014; 120: 564–578.

  32. Duceppe E., Parlow J., MacDonald P. et al.; Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines on perioperative cardiac risk assessment and management for patients who undergo noncardiac surgery. Can. J. Cardiol. 2017; 33(1): 17-32.

  33. Glance L.G., Lustik S.J., Hannan E.L. et al. The Surgical Mortality Probability Model: derivation and validation of a simple risk prediction rule for noncardiac surgery. Ann. Surg. 2012; 255: 696–702.

  34. Sumin A.N., Duplyakov D.V., Belyalov F.I. et al. Guidelines for the assessment and correction of cardiovascular risks in non-cardiac surgery. Russ. J. Cardiol. 2023; 28 (8): 5555.

  35. Fronczek J., Polok K., Devereaux P.J. et al. External validation of the Revised Cardiac Risk Index and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest calculator in noncardiac vascular surgery. Br. J. Anaesth. 2019; 123 (4): 421–429.

  36. Snowden C.P., Prentis J.M., Anderson H.L. et al. Submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts complications and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing major elective surgery. Ann. Surg. 2010; 251: 535–541.

  37. Munro J., Booth A., Nicholl J. Routine preoperative testing: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Technol. Assess. 1997; 1 (12): 1–62.

  38. Klyuchevsky V.V. Injury Surgery: A Guide for Physician Assistants, Surgeons, and Traumatologists of District Hospitals. 2nd ed. Yaroslavl; Rybinsk: Rybinsk House of Printing, 2004. 787 p.

  39. Ma J., He L., Wang X. et al. Relationship between admission blood glucose level and prognosis in elderly patients without previously known diabetes who undergo emergency non-cardiac surgery. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2015; 10: 561–566.

  40. Zhang L., Li N., Li Y. Cardiac biomarkers predicting MACE in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a meta-analysis Front. Psysiol. 2019; (9): 1923.

  41. Rodseth R.N., Biccard B.M., Le Manach Y. et al. The prognostic value of pre-operative and post-operative B-type natriuretic peptides in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal fragment of pro-B-type natriuretic peptide: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2014; 63: 170–180.

  42. Della Rocca GJ. Displaced patella fractures. J Knee Surg. 2013 Oct;26(5):293-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1353988.

  43. Lazaro LE, Wellman DS, Pardee NC, Gardner MJ, Toro JB, Macintyre NR 3rd, Helfet DL, Lorich DG. Effect of computerized tomography on classification and treatment plan for patellar fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2013 Jun;27(6):336-44. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318270dfe7. PMID: 22955333.

  44. Jeger R.V., Probst C., Arsenic R. et al. Long-term prognostic value of the pre-operative 12-lead electrocardiogram before major noncardiac surgery in coronary artery disease. Am. Heart J. 2006; 151: 508–13

  45. Duceppe E., Parlow J., MacDonald P. et al.; Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines on perioperative cardiac risk assessment and management for patients who undergo noncardiac surgery. Can. J. Cardiol. 2017; 33(1): 17-32.

  46. Rinfret S., Goldman L., Polanczyk C.A. et al. Value of immediate postoperative electrocardiogram to update risk stratification after major noncardiac surgery. Am. J. Cardiol. 2004; 94: 1017-22.

  47. Bottiger B.W., Motsch J., Teschendorf P. et al. Postoperative 12-lead ECG predicts peri-operative myocardial ischaemia associated with myocardial cell damage. Anaesthesia. 2004; 59: 1083-90

  48. Chang H.Y., Chang W.T., Liu Y.W. Application of transthoracic echocardiography in patients receiving intermediate- or high-risk noncardiac surgery. PLoS ONE. 2019; 14 (4): e0215854.

  49. Sougawa H., Ino Y., Kitabata H. et al. Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction and preoperative hemoglobin level on perioperative adverse cardiovascular events in noncardiac surgery. Heart Vessels. 2021; 36: 1317–26

  50. Trauma / Ed. by David V. Feliciano, Kenneth L. Mattox, Ernest E. Moore; transl. from English ed. by L.A. Yakimov, N.L. Matveev. Moscow: Panfilov Publishing House: BINOM, 2013.

  51. Braun W., Wiedemann M., Rüter A., Kundel K., Kolbinger S. Indications and results of nonoperative treatment of patellar fractures. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1993. vol. 289. P.197-201. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199304000-00028.

  52. Boström A. Fracture of the patella. A study of 422 patellar fractures. Acta Orthop. Scand Suppl. 1972. vol. 143. P.1-80. DOI: 10.3109/ort.1972.43.suppl-143.01

  53. Melvin JS, Mehta S. Patellar fractures in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Apr;19(4):198–207.

  54. Belenky I.G., Sergeev G.D., Kochish A.Yu., Mayorov B.A. Modern methods of treatment of patients with patellar fractures // Modern Problems of Science and Education. – 2020. – No. 4. ; URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=29991 (accessed: Mar 4, 2025).

  55. Wild M., Fischer K., Hilsenbeck F., Hakimi M., Betsch M. Treating patella fractures with a fixed-angle patella plate—A prospective observational study. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured. 2016. vol. 47. P.1737-1743. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.06.018

  56. Berg E.E. Open reduction internal fixation of displaced transverse patella fractures with figure-eight wiring through parallel cannulated compression screws. J. Orthop. Trauma. 1997. vol. 11. no. 8. P.573-576. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199711000-00005.

  57. Thelen S., Schneppendahl J., Baumgärtner R., Eichler C., Koebke J., Betsch M., Hakimi M., Windolf J., Wild M. Cyclic long-term loading of a bilateral fixed-angle plate in comparison with tension band wiring with K-wires or cannulated screws in transverse patella fractures. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013. vol. 21. no. 2. P.311-317. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-1999-1.

  58. Busel G., Barrick B., Auston D., Achor K., Watson D., Maxson B., Infante A., Sanders R., Mir H.R. Patella fractures treated with cannulated lag screws and fiberwire® have a high union rate and low rate of implant removal. Injury. 2020. vol. 51. P.473-477. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.002

  59. Wurm S., Bühren V., Augata P. Treating patella fractures with a locking patella plate – first clinical results. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured. 2018. vol. 49. no. 1. P.51-55. DOI: 10.1016/S0020- 1383(18)30304-8.

  60. Jang J.H., Rhee S.J., Kim J.W. Hook plating in patella fractures. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured. 2019. vol. 50. P.2084-2088. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.08.018.

  61. Matejcic A., Ivica M., Jurisic D., Cuti T., Bakota B., Vidovic D. Internal fixation of patellar apex fractures with the basket plate: 25 years of experience. Injury, Int. J. Care Injured. 2015. vol. 46. P.87-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.068.

  62. Levchenko K.K., Beydik O.V., Litvak M.B., Lukpanova T.N., Markov D.A. Treatment of patellar fractures using external fixation devices // Saratov Journal of Medical Scientific Research. 2008. Vol. 4. No. 3. P. 95-96.

  63. Koval KJ, Kim YH. Patella fractures. Evaluation and treatment. Am J Knee Surg. 1997;10(2):101-108

  64. Raja BS, Jain A, Paul S, Choudhury AK, Kalia RB. Plate osteosynthesis in patellar fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022;32(8):1627-1640. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03143-5.

  65. Tsotsolis S, Ha J, Fernandes ARC, Park JY, Dewhurst M, Walker T, Ilo K, Park SR, Patel A, Hester T, Poutoglidou F. To plate, or not to plate? A systematic review of functional outcomes and complications of plate fixation in patellar fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Dec;33(8):3287-3297. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03597-9.

  66. Zhang Y, Xu Z, Zhong W, Liu F, Tang J. Efficacy of K-wire tension band fixation compared with other alternatives for patella fractures: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Sep 5;13(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0919-6.

  67. Waldron N.H., Jones C.A., Gan T.J. et al. Impact of perioperative dexamethasone on postoperative analgesia and side-effects: systematic review and meta-analysis. Brit. J. Anaesthesia. 2013; 110 (2): 191–200.

  68. Wick E.C., Grant M.C., Wu C.L. Postoperative multimodal analgesia pain management with nonopioid analgesics and techniques,: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152 (7): 691.

  69. Doleman B., Mathiesen O., Sutton A.J. et al. Non-opioid analgesics for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br. J. Anaesth. 2023; 130 (6): 719-728.

  70. Hsu J.R. Mir H., Wally M.K., Seymour R.B.; Orthopaedic Trauma Association Musculoskeletal Pain Task Force. Clinical practice guidelines for pain management in acute musculoskeletal injury. J. Orthopaedic Trauma. 2019; 33 (5): e158–e182.

  71. Gillespie W.J., Walenkamp G.H. Antibiotic prophylaxis for surgery for proximal femoral and other closed long bone fractures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 2010 (3): CD000244.

  72. Bratzler D.W., Dellinger E.P., Olsen K.M. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Amer. J. Health-System Pharm. 2013; 70(3): 195–283.

  73. AO Principles of Fracture Management: Vol. 1: Principles, Vol. 2: Specific fractures /ed. by R.E. Buckley, C.G. Moran, T. Apivatthakakul. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 2018

  74. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection, 2-nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. 184 p.

  75. 4 Chang Y., Kennedy S.A., Bhandari M. et al. Effects of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with open fracture of the extremities: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. JBJS Rev. 2015; 3 (6): e2.

  76. Sorger J.I., Kirk P.G., Ruhnke C.J. et al. Once daily, high dose versus divided, low dose gentamicin for open fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (366): 197-204.

  77. Hoff W.S., Bonadies J.A., Cachecho R., Dorlac W.C. East Practice Management Guidelines Work Group: update to practice management guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic use in open fractures. J Trauma. 2011; 70 (3): 751-754.

  78. Takahara S., Tokura T., Nishida R. et al. Ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefazolin plus aminoglycosides for antimicrobial prophylaxis in management of Gustilo type IIIA open fractures: A retrospective cohort study. Injury. 2022; 53 (4): 1517-1522

  79. Trauma – ICM Philly [Electronic resource]. Metsemakers W.-J., Zalavras C. What is the most optimal prophylactic antibiotic coverage and treatment duration for open fractures of long bones? URL: https://www.icmortho.org/_files/ugd/0540e9_b7c38db1ee2543f29f7f54fb2053b669.pdf. (accessed: Jul 30, 2025).

  80. Briko N.I., Bozhkova S.A., Brusina E.B. et al.; National Association of Specialists in Healthcare-Associated Infections Control (NASCI). Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: Guidelines. Moscow, 2022. 74 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: https: //www.nasci.ru/?id=102733&download=1 (Access date: Apr 27, 2024).

  81. Bozhkova S.A., Tikhilov R.M., Andriyashkin V.V. et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of thromboembolic complications in traumatology and orthopedics: guidelines. Traumatol. Orthop. Russia. 2022; 28 (3): 136-166.

  82. Seliverstov E.I., Lobastov K.V., Ilyukhin E.A. et al. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Guidelines of Russian experts. Phlebology. 2023; 17 (3): 152-296.

  83. Kobayashi H., Akamatsu Y., Kumagai K. et al. The use of factor Xa inhibitors following opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2017; 25 (9): 2929-2935.

  84. Lee J.K., Koo J.W., Jeong S.Y. et al. Perioperative symptomatic venous thromboembolism after immediate chemoprophylaxis in patients with pelvic and lower-extremity fractures. Sci. Rep. 2020; 10 (1): 5431.

  85. Tang Y., Wang K., Shi Z. et al. A RCT study of Rivaroxaban, low-molecular weight heparin, and sequential medication regimens for the prevention of venous thrombosis after internal fixation of hip fracture. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017; 92: 982-988.

  86. Wrzosek A., Jakowicka-Wordliczek J., Zajaczkowska R. et al. Perioperative restrictive versus goal-directed fluid therapy for adults undergoing major non-cardiac surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 12 (12): CD012767.

  87. Zabolotskikh I.B., Kirov M.Yu., Afonchikov V.S. et al. Perioperative management of patients receiving long-term antithrombotic therapy. Clinical Guidelines of the Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists of Russia. A.I. Saltanov Intensive Care Herald. 2019; (1): 7–19.

  88. Geerts W.H., Bergqvist D., Pineo G.F., et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th ed.). Chest. 2008; 133(6 Suppl): 381s-453s.

  89. Meier K.A., Clark E., Tarango C. Et al. Venous thromboembolism in hospitalized adolescents: an approach to risk assessment and prophylaxis. Hosp. Pediatrics. 2015; 5(1): 44-51.

  90. Newall F., Branchford B., Male C. Anticoagulant prophylaxis and therapy in children: current challenges and emerging issues. J. Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2018; 16 (2): 196-208.

  91. Mahajerin A., Webber E.C., Morris J. et al. Development and implementation results of a venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guideline in a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Hosp. Pediatrics. 2015; 5(12): 630-636.

  92. Odent T., de Courtivron B., Gruel Y. Thrombotic risk in children undergoing orthopedic surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106 (1S): S109-S114.

  93. Mills K., Hill C., King M. et al. Just DOAC: Use of direct-acting oral anticoagulants in pediatrics. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2023; 80 (7): 412-422.

  94. Cheng Y. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Pediatric. Inpatient Clinical Practice Guideline. University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority, 2023. 14 p. URL: https: //www.uwhealth.org/cckm/cpg/hematology-and-coagulation/Pediatric-VTE-PPX-Consensus-Care-GL---April-2023-Final.pdf (accessed: May 31, 2024).

  95. Giossi R., Menichelli D., D'Amico F. et al. Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in the pediatric population: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2023; 21 (10): 2784-2796.

  96. Trame M.N., Mitchell L., Krumpel A. et al. Population pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin in infants, children and adolescents during secondary thromboembolic prophylaxis: a cohort study. J. Thrombosis Haemostasis. 2010; 8(9): 1950-1958.

  97. Lyle C.A., Sidonio R.F., Goldenberg N.A. New developments in pediatric venous thromboembolism and anticoagulation, including the target-specific oral anticoagulants. Curr. Opinion Pediatr. 2015; 27 (1): 18-25.

  98. Raffini L., Trimarchi T., Beliveau .J, Davis D. Thromboprophylaxis in a pediatric hospital: a patient-safety and quality-improvement initiative. Pediatrics. 2011; 127(5): e1326-1332.

  99. Dix D., Andrew M., Marzinotto V. et al. The use of low molecular weight heparin in pediatric patients: a prospective cohort study. J. Pediatr. 2000;136(4):439-445

  100. Amer K.M., Rehman S., Amer K., Haydel C. Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in orthopaedic fracture surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic literature review. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31 (10): 520-525.

  101. Bierke S., Häner M., Bentzin M. et al. The use of tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in osteotomy at knee level: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30 (12): 4104-4114

  102. Gibbs V.N., Geneen L.J., Champaneria R. et al. Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing definitive fixation or joint replacement for hip, pelvic and long bone fractures. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2023; 6 (6): CD013499

  103. Shin H.W., Park J.J., Kim H.J. et al. Efficacy of perioperative intravenous iron therapy for transfusion in orthopedic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019; 14 (5): e0215427.

  104. Jones J.J., Mundy L.M., Blackman N., Shwarz M. Ferric carboxymaltose for anemic perioperative populations: a systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. J. Blood Med. 2021; 12: 337-359.

  105. SanPiN 3.3686-21 "Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for the prevention of infectious diseases." (approved by the Decree of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation dated Jan 28, 2021 No. 4) (ed. dated May 25, 2022).

  106. Liang J.L., Tiwari T., Moro P. et al. Prevention of pertussis, tetanus, and diphtheria with vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2018; 67(2): 1–44.

  107. Thewlis D., Fraysse F., Callary S.A. et al. Postoperative weight bearing and patient reported outcomes at one year following tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2017; 48: 1650–1656.

  108. Hare K.B., Brand E., Bloch T. Highly impacted bone allograft may allow immediate weight bearing in tibial plateau fractures: A case report. Trauma Case Rep. 2020; 29: 100331.

  109. Pires J., Oliveira S., Figueiredo P., Pinheiro J.P. Rehabilitation of simultaneous bilateral epiphysial fracture of proximal tibia in adolescent. BMJ Case Rep. 2018; 2018: bcr2017223619

  110. Raschke M.J., Kittl C., Domnick C. Partial proximal tibia fractures. EFORT Open Rev. 2017; 2 (5): 241-249.

  111. Kalmet P.H.S., Van Horn Y.Y., Sanduleanu S, et al. Patient-reported quality of life and pain after permissive weight bearing in surgically treated trauma patients with tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019; 139 (4): 483-488.following implant removal. J. Med. Pharm. Allied Sci. 2022; 11 (1): 4328-4331.

  112. Schnackers M.L.A.P., van Horn Y.Y., Meys G.H.H. et al. Evidence-based rehabilitation therapy following surgery for (peri-)articular fractures: A systematic review. J. Rehabil. Med. 2019; 51 (9): 638-645.

  113. Dong W., Lisitano L.S.J., Marchand L.S. et al. Weight-bearing guidelines for common geriatric upper and lower extremity fractures. Curr. Osteoporos Rep. 2023; 21 (6): 698-709

  114. Kalmet P.H.S., Van Horn Y.Y., Sanduleanu S. et al. Patient-reported quality of life and pain after permissive weight bearing in surgically treated trauma patients with tibial plateau fractures: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019; 139: 483–488.

  115. Williamson M., Iliopoulos E., Jain A. et al. Immediate weight bearing after plate fixation of fractures of the tibial plateau. Injury. 2018; 49: 1886–1890.

  116. Thewlis D., Callary S.A., Fraysse F., Solomon L.B. Peak loading during walking is not associated with fracture migration following tibial plateau fracture: a preliminary case series. J. Orthop. Res. 2015; 33: 1398–1406.

  117. Iliopoulos E., Galanis N. Physiotherapy after tibial plateau fracture fixation: A systematic review of the literature. SAGE Open Med. 2020; 8: 2050312120965316.

  118. Kalmet P., Maduro C., Verstappen C. et al. Effectiveness of permissive weight bearing in surgically treated trauma patients with peri- and intra-articular fractures of the lower extremities: a prospective comparative multicenter cohort study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 34 (3): 1363-1371.

  119. Alves D.P.L., Wun P.Y.L., Alves A.L. et al. Weight discharge in postoperative of plateau fracture tibialis: systematic review of literature. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020; 55 (4): 404-409.

  120. Nawkhare A.V., Jawade S., Wadhokar O.C. Effect of novel based postoperative physiotherapy rehabilitation on functional outcome in malunited supracondylar fracture of femur and proximal tibia fracture following implant removal. J. Med. Pharm. Allied Sci. 2022; 11 (1): 4328-4331.

  121. Arnold J.B., Tu C.G., Phan T.M. et al. Characteristics of postoperative weight bearing and management protocols for tibial plateau fractures: Findings from a scoping review. Injury. 2017; 48 (12): 2634-2642.

  122. Callary S.A., Jones C.F., Kantar K. A new approach to surgical management of tibial plateau fractures. J. Clin. Med. 2020; 9 (3): 626.

  123. Haak K.T., Palm H., Holck K. et al. Immediate weight-bearing after osteosynthesis of proximal tibial fractures may be allowed. Dan. Med. J. 2012; 59: A4515.

  124. Nawkhare A.V., Jawade S., Wadhokar O.C. Effect of novel based postoperative physiotherapy rehabilitation on functional outcome in malunited supracondylar fracture of femur and proximal tibia fracture following implant removal. 2022; 11 (1): 4328-4331.

  125. Pashikanti L, Von Ah D. Impact of early mobilization protocol on the medical- surgical inpatient population: an integrated review of literature. Clin Nurse Spec. 2012; 26(2): 87-94.

  126. American Geriatrics Society 2023 updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J. Amer. Geriatr. Soc. 2023; 71 (7): 2052-2081.

  127. European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, European Society of Anaesthesiology. 2018. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2018; 35: 84–89.

  128. Goldman L., Caldera D.L., Nussbaum S.R. et al. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. Ner Engl. J. Med. 1977; 297 (16): 845-850.

  129. Lee T.H., Marcantonio E.R., Mangione C.M. et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999; 100 (10): 1043-9.

  130. Davis C., Tait G., Carroll J. et al. The Revised Cardiac Risk Index in the new millennium: a single-centre prospective cohort re-evaluation of the original variables in 9,519 consecutive elective surgical patients. Can. J. Anaesth. 2013; 60 (9): 855-863.

  131. Marzi I., Frank J., Rose S. Pediatric Skeletal Trauma. A Practical Guide. Berlin: Springer, 2022: 626 p.

  132. Vlasova A.V., Smirnova E.V., Tenovskaya T.A. et al. Protocol for perioperative and post-exposure antibiotic prophylaxis at the Morozov City Children's Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Healthcare Department. Metropolitan Health. 2021; 2 (2): 46-64.

  133. Opri F., Bianchini S., Nicoletti L. et al. on behalf of the Peri-Operative Prophylaxis in Neonatal and Paediatric Age (POP-NeoPed) Study Group. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients of neonatal and pediatric age undergoing orthopedic and hand surgery: A RAND /UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study. Antibiotics. 2022; 11: 289.

  134. Bernière J., Dehullu J.P., Gall O., Murat I. Intravenous iron in the treatment of postoperative anemia in surgery of the spine in infants and adolescents. Rev. Chir. Orthop. Reparatrice Appar. Mot. 1998; 84: 319–322.

  135. Charuvila S, Davidson SE, Thachil J, Lakhoo K. Surgical decision making around paediatric preoperative anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health. 2019; 3 (11): 814-821.

  136. Drendel AL, Lyon R, Bergholte J, Kim MK. Outpatient pediatric pain management practices for fractures. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006; 22 (2): 94-9.

  137. Hauer J. Pain in children: Approach to pain assessment and overview of management principles. In: UpToDate, Poplack DG (Ed), Wolters Kluwer. (Accessed on April 04, 2024).

  138. Orliaguet G., Hamza J., Couloigner V. et al. A case of respiratory depression in a child with ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolism after tramadol. Pediatrics. 2015; 135 (3): e753-5.

  139. Schechter W. Pharmacologic management of acute perioperative pain in infants and children. In: UpToDate, Sun LS (Ed), Wolters Kluwer. (Accessed on March 27, 2024).

  140. Richman J.M., Liu S.S., Courpas G. et al. Does continuous peripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids? A meta-analysis. Anesth. Analg. 2006; 102 (1): 248-257.

  141. Wei Y., Zhang Y., Jin T. et al. Effects of tranexamic acid on bleeding in pediatric surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg. 2021; 8: 759937.

  142. Bolton L. Local tranexamic acid reduces surgical blood loss. Wounds. 2022; 33(2):68-70.

  143. Xie J, Hu Q, Huang Q. et al. Comparison of intravenous versus topical tranexamic acid in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty: An updated meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2017; 153: 28-36.

  144. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Blood transfusion: NICE guideline (NG24), 2015. URL: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng24/resources/blood-transfusion-pdf-1837331897029.

  145. Kennedy A.P., Ignacio R.C., Ricca R. (eds.) Pediatric trauma care. A practical guide. Springer, 2022: 572 p.

  146. Rupprecht C.E., Briggs D., Brown C.M. et al. Use of a reduced (4-dose) vaccine schedule for postexposure prophylaxis to prevent human rabies: recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices MMWR Recomm Rep 2010; 59 (RR-2):1

  147. Gao J., Yu X., Cao G. et al. Assessing the impact of the 2018 tetanus guidelines on knowledge and practices of emergency physicians in trauma patients: a national survey study. Peer J. 2023: 11: e16032.

  148. Batıbay S.G., Türkmen İ., Duman S. et al. Is tranexamic acid safe and reliable during tibial intramedullary nailing? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018; 24 (6): 575-580

  149. Boyce RH, Singh K, Obremskey WT. Acute Management of Traumatic Knee Dislocations for the Generalist. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Dec;23(12):761-8. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00349.

  150. Robertson A, Nutton RW, Keating JF. Dislocation of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Jun;88(6):706-11. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.17448.

  151. Lachman JR, Rehman S, Pipitone PS. Traumatic Knee Dislocations: Evaluation, Management, and Surgical Treatment. Orthop Clin North Am. 2015 Oct;46(4):479-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.06.004.

  152. Kennedy JC. Complete dislocation of the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg 1963;45A:889–904

  153. Schenck RC. The dislocated knee. Instr Course Lect 1994;43:127-36.

  154. Stannard JP, Sheils TM, Lopez-Ben RR, et al. Vascular injuries in knee dislocations: the role of physical examination in determining the need for arteriography. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:910-15.

  155. Stannard JP, Schreiner AJ. Vascular Injuries following Knee Dislocation. J Knee Surg. 2020 Apr;33(4):351-356. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701210. Epub 2020 Jan 27. PMID: 31986532.

  156. Seroyer ST, Musahl V, Harner CD. Management of the acute knee dislocation: the Pittsburgh experience. Injury. 2008 Jul;39(7):710-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.11.022. Epub 2008 May 12. PMID: 18472101.

  157. Zabolotskikh I.B., Kirov M.Yu., Afonchikov V.S., et al. Perioperative management of patients receiving long-term antithrombotic therapy. Russian Federation of anesthesiologists and reanimatologists guidelines // Ann. Crit. Care. 2019. № 1. P. 7–19. doi: 10.21320/1818-474X-2019-1-7-19.

  158. Afshari A., Ageno W., Ahmed A., et al. European Guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Executive summary // Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2018. Vol. 35, № 2. P. 77–83. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000729.

  159. Muthyala S., Lohanathan A., Thampi S., Singh K. (). Pain management in acute trauma. Current Medical Issues. 2020;18: 222 - 228. https://doi.org/10.4103/cmi.cmi_9_20.

  160. Cohen SP, Christo PJ, Moroz L. Pain management in trauma patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(2):142-161. doi: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000107499.24698.CA.

  161. Dai L.Y., Zhang W.M. Fractures of the patella in children. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(4):243–245.

  162. Schmal H, Strohm P.C., Niemeyer P., Reising K., Kuminack K., Sudkamp N.P. Fractures of the patella in children and adolescents. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76(5):644–650.

  163. Grogan DP, Carey TP, Leffers D, Ogden JA. Avulsion fractures of the patella. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990;10(6):721–730.

  164. Ansari S, Barman S, Raja BS, et al. "Pediatric Patella fractures - A Systematic review". J Orthop. 2023;49: 6-17. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2023.11.049.

  165. Mencio, Gregory & Swiontkowski, Marc. (2014). Green's Skeletal Trauma in Children: Fifth Edition. 292-296.

  166. Ogden JA. Radiology of postnatal skeletal development. X. Patella and tibial tuberosity. Skeletal Radiol. 1984;11(4):246–257.

  167. Barsoum Z. Nail-patella syndrome. Sudan J Paediatr. 2023;23(2):252-254. doi:10.24911/SJP.106-1657814963.

  168. Kartavenko K.A., Zorin V.I., Lukyanov S.A. Post-traumatic ossification of the patellar ligament in children: a case series. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2024;30(4): 129-139. https://doi.org/10.17816/2311-2905-17511

  169. Marzi, Ingo & Frank, Johannes & Rose, Stefan. (2022). Pediatric Skeletal Trauma, A Practical Guide. 10.1007/978-3-030-93685-3

  170. Odent T., de Courtivron B., Gruel Y. Thrombotic risk in children undergoing orthopedic surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106 (1S): P109-114.

  171. Cheng Y. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis. Pediatric. Inpatient Clinical Practice Guideline. University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics Authority, 2023. 14 p. URL: https: //www.uwhealth.org/cckm/cpg/hematology-and-coagulation/Pediatric-VTE-PPX-Consensus-Care-GL---April-2023-Final.pdf.

  172. Murphy RF, Naqvi M, Miller PE, Feldman L, Shore BJ. Pediatric orthopaedic lower extremity trauma and venous thromboembolism. J Child Orthop. 2015 Oct;9(5):381-4. doi: 10.1007/s11832-015-0697-1. Epub 2015 Oct 12. PMID: 26459458; PMCID: PMC4619371

  173. Crall T., White B. Rehabilitation guidelines for patella fracture post op ORIF /Mammoth Orthopedic Institute, 2020: 3p. – https://www.mammothortho.com/pdf/knee-patellar-fracture-post-op-orif.pdf

  174. Darbois N. Patellar / Kneecap Fracture: Recovery Time and Tips for Walking Again https://kinedarbois.fr/en/2023/05/19/walking-after-patellar-fracture-recovery-time/ Last update: May 2023.

  175. Exler Y. Patella fracture: review of the literature and five case presentations. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1991; 13(4): 177-83.

  176. Matsushita T., Kuroda R. Patellar fractures, including stress and sleeve fractures //Espregueira-Mendes, J., Karlsson, J., Musahl, V., Ayeni, O.R. (eds). Orthopaedic sports medicine. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024: 1-11. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-65430-6_100-1

  177. Papotto G., Panvini F.M.C, Schütze K., at all. Review Patellar Sleeve Fracture: An Update of Literature. Surgeries 2024, 5, 835–847. https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5030067

  178. Pesch S., Greve F., Zyskowski M.,at all. High return to sports rates after operative treatment of patella fractures European J. of Medical Research v.28, Article number: 366 (2023).

  179. Patellar Fractures https://www.physio-pedia.com/Patellar_Fractures fracture of the patella: consequences https://gazbt.ru/en/travmatologiya/reabilitatsiya-posle-pereloma-nadkolennika.html

  180. Sayum Filho J, Lenza M, Tamaoki MJ. et al. Interventions for treating fractures of the patella in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 2(2): CD009651.

  181. Schuett D.J, Hake M. E, Mauffrey C, at all. Current Treatment Strategies for Patella Fractures Trauma update June 2015 | Volume 38 • Number 6.

  182. Scuderi G.R., Nasra M.H., Silver J. et al. Rehabilitation of knee disorders : Book Chapter 2023-08-08? P 341-378 https://colab.ws/articles/10.1007%2F978-3-031-32026-2_10 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-32026-2_10.

  183. Sousa P.L., Stuart M.J., Prince M.R., Dahm D.L. Nonoperative management of minimally displaced patellar sleeve fractures. J Knee Surg. 2021; 34(3): 242-246.

  184. Steinmetz S., Brügger A., Chauveau J. et al. Practical guidelines for the treatment of patellar fractures in adults. Swiss. Med. Wkly. 2020; 150: w20165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20165

  185. Sunit. S. Ekka Easy Patella Fracture Rehabilitation Exercise & Physiotherapy Protocol. Last updated on february 11th, 2025 at 10:39 am

  186. Henre P. Rehabilitation of a Post-surgical Patella Fractur case report. Physiotherapy, March 2000/vol 86/no3,130-142

  187. Solod E.I., Zagorodniy N.V., Lazarev A.F., Tsykunov M.B., Abdulkhabirov M.A., Khijazin V.Kh. Surgical treatment and rehabilitation options for patients with patellar fractures. Journal: N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics. 2019;(1): 11–16, DOI: 10.17116/vto201901111

  188. Zagorodniy N.V., Khijazin V.Kh., Abdulkhabirov M.A., Solod E.I., Futryk A.B. Patellar fractures and their treatment: teaching aid – Moscow: RUDN University, 2017. – 44 p.: ill. ISBN 978-5-209-08098-5 UDC 617.583.1-089(072.8) LBC 54.581.97

  189. Vasyuta A.S. Patellar fracture. https://physiotherapist.ru/patellar-fracture

  190. Baymagambetov Sh.A., Mursalov N.K., Balgimbayev A.K., et al. Patellar fracture : Clinical Protocols of the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Kazakhstan - 2015 (Kazakhstan) https://diseases.medelement.com/diseases/Patellar fracture /14422

  191. Toney-Butler TJ, Unison-Pace WJ. Nursing Admission Assessment and Examination. 2023 Aug 28. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan.

  192. Wardak MI, Siawash AR, Hayda R. Fixation of patella fractures with a minimally invasive tensioned wire method: compressive external fixation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 May;72(5):1393-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318248b7cf. PMID: 22673272.

  193. Frizzell K.H., Cavanaugh P.K., Herman M.J. Pediatric Perioperative Pain Management // Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2017. Vol. 48, № 4. P. 467–480.

  194. Messner J., Papakostidis C., Giannoudis P.V., et al. Duration of Administration of Antibiotic Agents for Open Fractures: Meta-Analysis of the Existing Evidence // Surg. Infect. 2017. Vol. 18, № 8. P. 854–867.

  195. Monagle P, Chan AKC, Goldenberg NA, et al. Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl):e737S-e801S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2308

  196. Gould MK, Garcia DA, Wren SM, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonorthopedic surgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012;141(2 Suppl): e227S-e277S. doi:10.1378/chest.11-2297.

  197. Melvin et al. (2020) "Rehabilitation after patellar fracture: a systematic review" J. of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01793-7

  198. Chen et al. (2018) "Early mobilization versus immobilization after surgical fixation of patellar fractures: a randomized controlled trial"J. Injury

    DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.05.022

  199. Mao et al. (2016)"Effect of NMES on quadriceps strength after patellar fracture surgery: a randomized clinical trial" American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000512

  200. AAOS (2016) Management of Patellar Fractures: Clinical Practice Guidelines" AAOS.org

  201. ESSKA (2020) Rehabilitation after knee trauma surgery" DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06052-y

  202. Frank SM, Oleyar MJ, Ness PM, Tobian AA. Reducing unnecessary preoperative blood orders and costs by implementing an updated institution-specific maximum surgical blood order schedule and a remote electronic blood release system. Anesthesiology. 2014 Sep;121(3):501-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000338. PMID: 24932853; PMCID: PMC4165815

  203. Routine preoperative tests for elective surgery: NICE guideline (NG 45), 05 April 2016. URL: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng45?utm_source=chatgpt.com

  204. Wick E.C., Grant M.C., Wu C.L. Postoperative Multimodal Analgesia Pain Management With Nonopioid Analgesics and Techniques: A Review // JAMA Surg. 2017. Vol. 152, № 7. P. 691.

  205. Richman J.M., Liu S.S., Courpas G., et al. Does Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Provide Superior Pain Control to Opioids? A Meta-Analysis // Anesth. Analg. 2006. Vol. 102, № 1. P. 248–257.

  206. Larsen, P., Arildsen, M., Kristensen, K. et al. High risk of complications following surgical treatment of patella fractures — a cross-sectional study of 798 patients with mean 6.4 years follow-up. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 50, 1127–1134 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-024-02445-7.

  207. Y.S. Polushin, I.V. Shlyk, K.N. Khrapov, A.A. Khryapa, K.G. Shapovalov, Y.S. Alexandrovich, S.M. Stepanenko. Anesthetic management for surgical interventions, dressings, and complex diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Guidelines. 2019.

  208. Decree of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation dated Jan 28, 2021 No. 4 "On approval of the sanitary rules and norms SanPiN 3.3686-21 'Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for the prevention of infectious diseases'". 2021

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

  1. Belenky I.G., MD, Professor, State Budgetary Institution "Saint Petersburg I.I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine", Saint Petersburg, member of ATOR.

  2. Bozhkova S.A., MD, Federal State Budgetary Institution "R.R. Vreden National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics" of the Russian Ministry of Health, Saint Petersburg, member of ATOR.

  3. Geroyeva I.B., MD, Professor, Federal State Budgetary Institution "N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics" of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow.

  4. Zorin V.I., PhD, Associate Professor, Federal State Budgetary Institution "G.I. Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma" of the Russian Ministry of Health, Saint Petersburg.

  5. Kleymenova E.B., MD, Professor, Federal State Budgetary Institution "N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics" of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow.

  6. Lukyanov S.A., PhD, Federal State Budgetary Institution "G.I. Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma" of the Russian Ministry of Health, Saint Petersburg.

  7. Mayorov B.A., PhD, State Budgetary Institution "Saint Petersburg I.I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine", Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, member of ATOR.

  8. Nazarenko A.G., MD, Professor of the RAS, Federal State Budgetary Institution "N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics" of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, Vice President of ATOR.

  9. Novikov V.A., PhD, Federal State Budgetary Institution "G.I. Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma" of the Russian Ministry of Health, Saint Petersburg.

  10. Otdelyonov V.A., PhD, Federal State Budgetary Institution "N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics" of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow.

  11. Sergeev G.D., PhD, State Budgetary Institution "Saint Petersburg I.I. Dzhanelidze Research Institute of Emergency Medicine", Saint Petersburg, member of ATOR.

Conflict of interest.

The working group on drafting the clinical guidelines for the treatment of patellar fractures has no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience for these clinical guidelines:

1. Orthopedic trauma surgeons

2. Surgeons

3. General practitioners (family physicians)

4. Medical rehabilitation physicians

5. Physical and rehabilitation medicine physicians

5. Pediatric surgeons

Stages of evaluating the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation:

  1. Definition of search and selection criteria for publications on clinical trials (CT) regarding the efficacy and/or safety of the medical intervention described in the recommendation statement.

  2. Systematic search and selection of CT publications in accordance with the previously defined criteria.

Systematic search and selection of clinical trial publications:

The evidence base for the recommendations consisted of publications retrieved via information retrieval in the following databases: Central Scientific Medical Library (CSML) "Russian Medicine", MEDLINE (US NLM), and COCHRANE Library; scientific electronic libraries eLibrary.ru and "CyberLeninka"; as well as on the Internet using Yandex, Google, and Google Scholar search engines, by reviewing leading specialized peer-reviewed domestic medical journals on the subject and treatment guidelines for fractures from the international Association for Osteosynthesis AO/ASIF.

Table 1. Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

Table 2. Scale for assessing the levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitation interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis

2

Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

Table 3. Scale for assessing the grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitation interventions)

GoR

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.

The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic updating at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of well-founded additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

Appendix A3.1 Pain management recommendations for major musculoskeletal trauma (surgical fixation of long bone fractures or complex joint fractures, extensive soft tissue trauma, extensive surgery, etc.) in adults

The table shows analgesic drugs and their dosing regimens in accordance with the Clinical Guideline for Pain Management in Acute Musculoskeletal Trauma [70].

Stage of treatment

Opioid analgesics

from the Opioids N02A group

Analgesic drugs not belonging to the Opioids N02A group and #gabapentin

Inpatient setting

Trimeperidine** 25–50 mg orally. Maximum single dose is 50 mg, maximum daily dose is 200 mg.

Ketorolac** 15 mg IV every 6 hours for 5 doses, then #ibuprofen** 600 mg orally every 8 hours [70]

OR Trimeperidine** 10–40 mg (from 1 ml of 10 mg/ml solution to 2 ml of 20 mg/ml solution) IM, SC, or IV. Maximum single dose is 40 mg, daily dose is 160 mg.

#Gabapentin 300 mg 3 times daily

Morphine** 10–30 mg IM or SC as needed for severe breakthrough pain

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours

Outpatient stage

First week (after discharge)

Tramadol** single dose 100 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 100 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

#Ibuprofen** 600 mg orally every 8 hours for 7 days [70]

#Gabapentin 100 mg 1 tablet orally 3 times daily for 7 days [70]

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours for 7 days; prolonged use of paracetamol must be monitored by a physician

Second week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

#Gabapentin 300 mg 3 times daily (gradually titrate up to the maximum daily dose of 3600 mg/day if necessary) [70]

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are decreased)1. Prolonged use of paracetamol must be monitored by a physician

Third week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

#Gabapentin as needed (max. 3600 mg/day)

Paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 12 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are tapered)

Fourth week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

#Gabapentin as needed (max. 3600 mg/day)

Paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 8 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are tapered)

Fifth week and beyond

-

NSAIDs as needed

Paracetamol** as needed

#Gabapentin as needed, then discontinue

1 In adults, paracetamol is not recommended for use as an analgesic for more than 5 days without prescription and medical supervision.

Appendix A3.2 Pain management recommendations for non-surgical musculoskeletal trauma (closed fractures, superficial wounds, etc.) in adults

Type of injury

Opioid analgesics

from the Opioids N02A group

Analgesic drugs not belonging to the Opioids N02A group

Minor trauma (minor bone fractures, sprains, superficial wounds)

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed,

paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 8 hours, then as needed

OR tramadol** single dose 50 mg IV as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

Major trauma (major bone fractures, ruptures)

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed,

paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 12 hours, then as needed

OR Tramadol** single dose 50 mg IV on demand, if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg in 30-60 minutes. Maximum daily dose 400 mg.

Appendix A3.3. Recommendations for Postoperative Analgesia in Children

Medicinal products

Single dose

Dosing regimen

Maximum daily dose

Maximum duration of use

Non-narcotic analgesic from the Other analgesics and antipyretics N02B group

Paracetamol**

Rectal suppositories:

3-6 months (6-8 kg): 50 mg

rectally at intervals of at least 4-6 hours

100 mg/day

Not specified in the instructions

7-12 months (8-11 kg): 100 mg

200 mg/day

1-4 years (12-16 kg): 100 mg

400 mg/day

5-9 years (17-30 kg): 250 mg

1000 mg/day

10-14 years: 500 mg

2000 mg/day

over 15 years: 500 mg

4000 mg/day

IV infusion:

10 kg and under: 7.5 mg/kg (0.75 ml/kg)

no more than 4 times/day, interval between infusions at least 4 hours

no more than 30 mg/kg/day

Not specified in the instructions

from 10 kg up to 33 kg inclusive: 15 mg/kg (1.5 ml/kg)

less than 60 mg/kg inclusive, but not more than 2 g

from 33 to 50 kg inclusive: 15 mg/kg (1.5 ml/kg)

less than 60 mg/kg inclusive, but not more than 3 g

over 50 kg: 1 g (100 ml)

no more than 4 g/day

Tablets

3-5 years: 200 mg

Every 4-6 hours

no more than 4 times a day

6-8 years: 250 mg

no more than 4 times a day

9-11 years: 500 mg

no more than 4 times a day

Over 12 years: 500-1000 mg

no more than 4 g/day

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Diclofenac**

Powder for oral solution

14-18 years: 50-100 mg

0.5-2 mg/kg per day orally, daily dose divided into 2-3 single doses

150 mg

7 days

Tablets:

6-14 years: 25 mg

0.5-2 mg/kg per day orally, daily dose divided into 2-3 single doses

150 mg

7 days

14-18 years: 25-50 mg

Ibuprofen**

Suspension (100 mg/5 ml):

3-6 months (5-7.6 kg): 2.5 ml (50 mg)

orally up to 3 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

7.5 ml (150 mg)

Not specified in the instructions

6-12 months (7.7-9 kg): 2.5 ml (50 mg)

orally 3-4 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

10 ml (200 mg)

1-3 years (10-16 kg): 5 ml

orally up to 3 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

15 ml (300 mg)

4–6 years (17–20 kg): 7.5 ml

22.5 ml (450 mg)

7–9 years (21–30 kg): 10 ml

30 ml (600 mg)

10–12 years (31–40 kg): 15 ml

45 ml (900 mg)

Suspension (200 mg / 5 ml):

1–3 years (10–16 kg): 2.5 ml (100 mg)

orally up to 3 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

7.5 ml (300 mg)

Not specified in the instructions

4–6 years (17–20 kg): 3.75 ml (150 mg)

11.25 ml (450 mg)

7–9 years (21–30 kg): 5 ml (200 mg)

15 ml (600 mg)

10–12 years (31–40 kg): 7.5 ml (300 mg)

22.5 ml (900 mg)

over 12 years (over 40 kg): 7.5–10 ml (300–400 mg)

30 ml (1200 mg)

Tablets:

aged 6 to 12 years (body weight > 20 kg): 200 mg

orally up to 4 times/day with an interval of at least 6 hours

800 mg

Not specified in the instructions

children over 12 years: 200 mg

orally 3–4 times/day with an interval of at least 6 hours

rectal suppositories, [FOR CHILDREN]

3–9 months (6.0 kg – 8.0 kg): 1 suppository (60 mg)

Up to 3 times per 24 hours, maximum 180 mg per day

30 mg/kg with dosing intervals of 6–8 hours

Maximum 3 days

9 months – 2 years (8.0 kg – 12.0 kg): 1 suppository (60 mg)

Up to 4 times per 24 hours, maximum 240 mg per day

Ketorolac**

Tablets:

children over 16 years: 10 mg

orally up to 4 times/day

40 mg

5 days

solution for intravenous and intramuscular administration; solution for intramuscular administration

over 16 years: 10–30 mg

IV, IM with an interval of at least 6 hours

90 mg

2 days

Opioids N02A

Morphine**

Oral solution/tablets

3 to 7 years: 5 mg

orally, every 6 hours

20 mg

Not specified in the instructions

7 to 17 years with body weight up to 70 kg: 5 mg

orally,

every 4 hours

30 mg

7 to 17 years with body weight of 70 kg or more: 10 mg

60 mg

17 years and older: 5–10 mg

Not specified in the instructions

solution for injection;

solution for subcutaneous administration

birth to 2 years: 100–200 mcg/kg body weight (0.1–0.2 mg/kg)

SC, if necessary every 4–6 hours.

15 mg

Not specified in the instructions

over 2 years: 100–200 mcg/kg body weight (0.1–0.2 mg/kg)

SC if necessary every 4–6 hours

Tramadol**1

solution for injection

1 to 12 years*: 1–2 mg/kg

IV, IM, SC

8 mg/kg/day or maximum 400 mg/day

from 12 years: 50–100 mg

IV, IM, SC; if satisfactory analgesia is not achieved 30–60 minutes after the initial dose, an additional 50 mg may be administered

400 mg/day

Not specified in the instructions

Tablets:

children over 14 years of age:

50–100 mg

orally; if satisfactory analgesia is not achieved within 30–60 minutes after the initial administration, an additional 50 mg may be prescribed

400 mg/day

Not specified in the instructions

Trimeperidine**

solution for injection.

Children2 over 2 years of age: 3–10 mg

IV, IM, SC

Not specified in the instructions

Not specified in the instructions

Fentanyl**†

solution for intravenous and intramuscular administration;

lyophilizate for the preparation of concentrate for solution for intravenous administration.

children from 1 year of age with spontaneous breathing: initial dose 3–5 mcg/kg, additional dose 1 mcg/kg.

IV

Not specified in the instructions

Not specified in the instructions

children from 1 year of age receiving mechanical ventilation: initial dose 15 mcg/kg, additional dose 1–3 mcg/kg.

IV

Not specified in the instructions

Not specified in the instructions

* In children under 12 years of age, morphine is the preferred choice if opioids (N02A) are required, as the use of tramadol** is associated with a higher risk of adverse reactions [156, 157].

† Not recommended for use in children because its metabolite accumulates in the body and provokes seizures upon repeated administration [158].

Appendix A3.4 Recommended intervals between prophylactic anticoagulant administration and neuraxial interventions in adults [127]

Anticoagulant (AC)

Before neuraxial intervention

(minimum time between the last anticoagulant dose and the neuraxial procedure)

With an indwelling epidural catheter

After epidural catheter removal

(timing for resuming AC therapy)

Sodium heparin**

4-6 h

Preferred anticoagulant

1 h

LMWH B01AB at prophylactic dose:

- enoxaparin sodium** 40 mg once daily SC (with normal renal function);

≥12 h

At least 8 hours must elapse after catheter placement before LMWH injection.

4 h

- enoxaparin sodium** 20 mg once daily SC (at creatinine clearance <30 ml/min)

≥24 h

(at creatinine clearance <30 ml/min)

The catheter should be removed no earlier than 12 hours after the LMWH injection.

4 h

fondaparinux sodium

36-72 h

Contraindicated

6 h

dabigatran etexilate**

3-5 days

rivaroxaban**

3 days

apixaban**

3 days

Please note that spinal or epidural anesthesia can be performed only 12 hours after administering a dose of LMWH B01AB and no earlier than 4–6 hours after administering UFH from the B01AB group (while aPTT or ACT values must be within the normal range) [87].

Appendix A3.5 Recommended dosing regimen of low-molecular-weight heparins from the heparin group B01AB for the prevention of high-risk VTE in conservative treatment and orthopedic surgery in adult patients at high risk for VTE

Drug

Recommended doses, frequency, and route of administration

Sodium heparin**

Subcutaneously, 5,000 IU 3 times daily

For interventions, the first injection is given 1–2 hours before surgery

Bemiparin sodium

Subcutaneously, 3,500 IU anti-Xa once daily

For interventions, 2 hours before surgery or 6 hours after, and every 24 hours on subsequent days

Daltaparin sodium

Choose one of the dosing regimens below.

a. if prophylaxis is initiated the day before surgery: 5000 IU SC on the evening prior to surgery, then 5000 IU SC every evening postoperatively.

b. if prophylaxis is initiated on the day of surgery: 2500 IU SC 2 hours before surgery and 2500 IU SC 8–12 hours later, but no earlier than 4 hours after the end of surgery. Then, starting the next day, 5000 IU SC every morning.

c. when starting prophylaxis after surgery: 2,500 IU SC 4–8 hours after surgery, but not earlier than 4 hours after the end of surgery. Then from the next day, 5,000 IU SC daily.

Nadroparin calcium

Subcutaneously (standard dosage: 9,500 anti-Xa IU/ml):

1. For VTE prophylaxis in patients at high risk of thrombosis:

1) body weight up to 70 kg: 0.4 ml once daily;

2) body weight 70 kg and over: 0.6 ml once daily;

3) for elderly patients, a dose reduction to 0.3 ml is advisable.

2. For orthopedic interventions:

1) Body weight up to 50 kg: 0.2 ml 12 hours before and 12 hours after surgery, then once daily until the 3rd postoperative day; from the 4th postoperative day, 0.3 ml once daily;

2) For body weight up to 50–69 kg, 0.3 ml 12 hours before and 12 hours after surgery, then once daily until the 3rd postoperative day; from the 4th postoperative day, 0.4 ml once daily;

3) Body weight 70 kg and over: 0.4 ml 12 hours before and 12 hours after surgery, then once daily until the 3rd postoperative day; from the 4th postoperative day, 0.6 ml once daily.

Enoxaparin sodium**

Subcutaneously, 40 mg once daily

For interventions, 12 hours before and 12 hours after surgery, then once daily throughout the postoperative period

Parnaparin sodium**

Subcutaneously, 0.4 ml (4,250 anti-Xa IU) once daily

For interventions, 12 hours before and 12 hours after surgery, then once daily throughout the postoperative period

Please note that spinal or epidural anesthesia can be performed only 12 hours after administering a dose of low-molecular-weight heparins from the heparin group (B01AB) and no earlier than 4–6 hours after administering UFH (heparin sodium**) (while aPTT or ACT values must be within the normal range) [157, 158].

Appendix A3.6 Bleeding risk factors in children aged 6 months to 18 years [109, 98, 113]

Pharmacoprophylaxis of VTE

NOT RECOMMENDED

(absolute contraindications)

Relative contraindications

to pharmacological VTE prophylaxis

  • Intracranial hemorrhage

  • Cerebral ischemia / acute stroke

  • Active bleeding

  • Recent thrombolytic therapy (<24 hours)

  • Intracranial mass

  • Recent lumbar puncture (<24 hours ago)

  • Coagulopathy

  • Neurosurgical procedure

  • Pelvic fracture within the last 48 hours

  • Uncontrolled hypertension

  • Recent intake of acetylsalicylic acid** or antiplatelet agents from antithrombotic drugs (<5–7 days ago)

Notes:

  1. If the patient meets at least one "NOT recommended" criterion, avoid pharmacoprophylaxis, as the risk outweighs the benefit.

  2. If the patient has at least one relative contraindication criterion, consider withholding pharmacoprophylaxis.

  3. Consider consultation with a hematologist if the patient is at high VTE risk with a high bleeding risk [90].

  4. Uncontrolled hypertension is defined as systolic or diastolic blood pressure above the 95th percentile for age, height, and sex [91].

  5. Coagulopathy is defined as INR > 1.5, aPTT > 44 s, fibrinogen < 100 g/dL, or platelets < 50,000/μL.

Appendix. VTE risk factors in children aged 6 months to 18 years [113, 164]

Acute conditions

  • Reduced mobility for more than 72 hours

  • Central venous access device

  • Active infection

  • Severe trauma or burn

  • Major surgery

  • Pregnancy

  • Critically ill

Chronic conditions

  • Autoimmune disorders associated with thrombosis

  • Thrombophilic state

  • Active malignancy

  • Active inflammatory condition

  • Smoking

  • Estrogen therapy

  • Obesity

Anamnestic factors

  • Asparaginase** within the preceding 30 days

  • Recent surgery within the past 30 days

  • History of thrombosis

  • Family history of VTE in a 1st-degree relative < 40 years of age at the time of thrombosis

Notes:

− Reduced mobility is defined as a decrease in mobility compared to baseline level or inability to participate in physical therapy.

− Central venous access device is defined as a non-tunneled catheter, tunneled catheter, or central venous catheter.

− Extensive burn is defined as a burn involving more than 50% of the body surface area.

− Major surgery refers to procedures lasting longer than 45 minutes.

− Critically ill patients are defined as those admitted to the intensive care unit or critical care unit (receiving inotropic support, mechanically ventilated).

− Thrombophilic states include antithrombin deficiency, protein C or S deficiency, factor V Leiden, or prothrombin gene mutation.

− Active malignancy is defined as receiving chemotherapy/radiation therapy within the preceding 6 months.

− Active inflammatory disease includes Kawasaki disease, inflammatory bowel disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, or nephrotic syndrome.

− Estrogen therapy includes systemic hormonal contraceptives (G03A) or estrogen replacement therapy within the last 2 weeks.

− Obesity is defined as a BMI above the 95th percentile for age.

Key:

Low VTE risk:

  • No altered mobility and 0-1 risk factors

Moderate VTE risk:

  • No mobility impairment and 2-3 risk factors

  • Altered mobility and 0-1 other risk factors

High VTE risk:

  • No mobility impairment and ≥4 risk factors

  • Altered mobility and ≥2 other risk factors

Thromboprophylaxis recommendation

VTE risk level

Thromboprophylaxis management

Low VTE risk

  • Early mobilization

  • No prophylaxis required

Moderate VTE risk

High VTE risk and

high bleeding risk

  • Early mobilization

  • Mechanical prophylaxis

High VTE risk and

low bleeding risk

  • Early mobilization

  • Mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix B1. Physician action algorithm for suspected patellar fracture

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms — Patellar Fractures

Appendix B2. Assessment of Cardiovascular Surgical Risk

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms — Patellar Fractures

Notes and abbreviations:

RF – cardiovascular risk factors (arterial hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia [elevated total cholesterol >4.9 mmol/L and/or LDL cholesterol >3 mmol/L and/or HDL cholesterol <1.0 mmol/L in men, <1.2 mmol/L in women, and/or triglycerides >1.7 mmol/L], diabetes mellitus, family history of premature cardiovascular disease [<55 years for men and <65 years for women]);

CVD – cardiovascular diseases (coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral atherosclerosis, chronic heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, valvular heart disease, cardiomyopathies);

rRCRI – reconstructed RCRI index (See Appendix G2);

FS – functional status (the patient's ability before the injury to independently climb 2 flights of stairs without stopping).

*- regional vascular center or specialized cardiological department.

Appendix C. Patient Information

Patellar fractures are an injury requiring specialized treatment in a trauma department. Conservative treatment is possible only for undisplaced fractures or with minimal fragment displacement (less than 2 mm) and an intact extensor mechanism. It involves immobilization in a plaster cast or knee brace with the limb extended for up to 6 weeks. The main disadvantages of such treatment are the high probability of knee joint contractures and a decrease in quadriceps femoris strength.

Surgical treatment is indicated for all displaced fractures, rupture of the extensor mechanism, and open injuries. Surgical tactics depend on the fracture type. Transverse fractures are treated with tension-band wiring (metal or polymeric, with K-wires or screws), which restores knee joint anatomy and creates conditions for fracture healing. Comminuted fractures may require fixation with plates or cannulated screws.

Rehabilitation begins immediately after surgery and includes passive and active movements in the knee joint, physiotherapy procedures, and exercises aimed at restoring quadriceps femoris strength. The timing of limb weight-bearing depends on the type of osteosynthesis. On average, weight-bearing on the injured limb is possible 8–12 weeks after surgery. Full recovery of knee joint function takes an average of 3–6 months.

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Appendix G1. Caprini Risk Assessment Scale for Venous Thromboembolism (Caprini J.)

Russian name: Caprini Risk Assessment Model for venous thromboembolism.

Original name: Caprini Score for Venous Thromboembolism.

Source: Lobastov K.V., Barinov V.E., Schastlivtsev I.V., Laberko L.A. Caprini scale as a tool for individual stratification of the risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism in a high-risk group. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova. 2014; (12):16-23.

Type: scale.

Purpose: assessment of venous thromboembolism risk.

Content (template):

1 point

Age 41–60 years

Lower extremity edema

Varicose veins

Body mass index > 25 kg/m2

Minor surgery

Sepsis (< 1 month)

Severe pulmonary disease (including pneumonia < 1 month)

Oral contraceptive use, hormone replacement therapy

Pregnancy and postpartum period (< 1 month)

History of: unexplained stillbirths, spontaneous abortions (≥3), premature delivery with gestosis, or intrauterine growth restriction

Acute myocardial infarction

Chronic heart failure (< 1 month)

Bed rest in a non-surgical patient

History of inflammatory bowel disease

History of major surgery (< 1 month)

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2 points

Age 61–74 years

Arthroscopic surgery

Malignant neoplasm105

Laparoscopic procedure (duration >45 min.)

Bed rest > 72 h

Limb immobilization (< 1 month)

Central venous catheterization

Major surgery (duration >45 min.)

3 points

Age > 75 years

Personal history of VTE

Family history of VTE

Factor V Leiden mutation

Prothrombin G20210A mutation

Hyperhomocysteinemia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Elevated anticardiolipin antibodies

Lupus anticoagulant

5 points

Stroke (< 1 month)

Multiple trauma (< 1 month)

Major joint arthroplasty

Femur and lower leg fractures (< 1 month)

Spinal cord injury/paralysis (< 1 month)

Key: Depending on the score obtained from history taking and patient examination, the patient is assigned to a specific risk group:

  • low risk: 0–1 points;

  • moderate risk: 2 points;

  • high risk: 3–4 points;

  • very high risk: 5 points or more.

Appendix G2. Revised Cardiac Risk Index (rRCRI)

Russian name: Reconstructed Revised Cardiac Risk Index for non-cardiac surgical procedures.

Original name: Reconstructed Revised Cardiac Risk Index (rRCRI).

Source: Davis C., Tait G., Carroll J. et al. The Revised Cardiac Risk Index in the new millennium: a single-centre prospective cohort re-evaluation of the original variables in 9,519 consecutive elective surgical patients. Can. J. Anaesth. 2013; 60(9): 855-863.

Type: scale.

Purpose: prediction of the risk of perioperative cardiac complications in noncardiac surgery: myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, ventricular fibrillation or cardiac arrest, complete AV block.

Content:

  1. High-risk surgery (intrathoracic, intra-abdominal, or suprainguinal vascular surgery) – 1 point.

  2. Ischemic heart disease (myocardial infarction, positive stress test, angina pectoris, nitroglycerin use, pathological Q wave on ECG) – 1 point.

  3. Heart failure (history of heart failure, pulmonary edema, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea, bilateral pulmonary rales, gallop rhythm, pulmonary congestion on chest X-ray) – 1 point.

  4. TIA/Stroke – 1 point.

  5. Creatinine clearance <30 ml/min – 1 point.

Scoring:

  • total score of 0 – low risk of cardiovascular complications;

  • a total score of 1 – moderate risk of cardiovascular complications;

  • a total score of 2 or more – high risk of cardiovascular complications.

Notes:

The RCRI index was developed in 1977 [128] to predict the risk of perioperative cardiac complications in non-cardiac surgery. It was validated in the Lee study [129], and in 2013 [130] it was revised and re-validated based on clinical risk factors (the criterion "creatinine level >176.8 µmol/L" was replaced by "creatinine clearance <30 ml/min", and the clinical criterion "insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus" was removed), which is why it is called the reconstructed index. It includes 5 parameters, each assigned 1 point. This particular version of the index is recommended by the Russian Society of Cardiology [34].

Scales and calculators from this guideline

Revised Cardiac Risk Index (rRCRI)Risk of cardiac complications in non-cardiac surgery (revised)Caprini ScoreIndividual risk assessment for venous thromboembolic complicationsModified Rankin Scale (mRS)Assessment of disability after stroke

If you practice in traumatology and orthopedics

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer based on the "Patellar fractures" guideline and other active Russian Ministry of Health CGs with a reference to the section, rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines