List of Abbreviations
PNS – paranasal sinuses
CT – computed tomography
Terms and Definitions
Xerostomia - dry mouth caused by reduced or absent saliva secretion.
Hyposmia - decreased olfactory function.
Anosmia - absence of olfactory function.
Apnea - cessation of breathing during sleep.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Nasal septal deviation – an anatomical change in the structure and position of the nasal septum relative to the midline, causing impaired nasal breathing. Synonyms – nasal septal deviation, crooked nasal septum.
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Nasal septal deviation without a traumatic agent can form due to a developmental imbalance in the prenatal period, during passage through the birth canal, as well as during periods of active growth—when the tissues of the osteocartilaginous framework of the nasal septum grow faster than the bone tissue of the nasal vault and floor. Nasal septal deviation can also form as a result of trauma. Depending on the type and mechanism of trauma, nasal septal deviations can vary characteristically. An atraumatic etiology of deviation is typical for children [1,2,3].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
Scientific research data on the prevalence of nasal septal deviation are very variable: from 15% to 20% in children and from 39.7% to 87.6% in adults [4,5].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
J34.2 – Deviated nasal septum
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
Currently, there are many classifications of nasal septal deviations. The most common are the classifications of Cottle M., R. Mladina, A.S. Lopatin, and G.Z. Piskunov [6,7,8,9].
Due to unification, we recommend using the following classification:
1) C-shaped deviation;
2) S-shaped curvature;
3) Crest;
4) Dislocation of the quadrangular cartilage;
5) Thickening ("bump").
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
Objectively, the clinical presentation of nasal septum deformity is characterized by the displacement of the nasal septum from the midline and alteration of its shape. The primary symptom is unilateral or bilateral nasal breathing difficulty. Concomitant symptoms that form the clinical syndromic complex of nasal septum deformity may include: hyposmia or anosmia, snoring, sleep apnea, xerostomia, dryness of the nasal mucosa, external nasal deformity, recurrent epistaxis, recurrent rhinosinusitis, posterior nasal drip, closed nasal speech (rhinolalia clausa), and recurrent tension-type headaches [10].
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Diagnostic criteria:
1) Patient complaints of persistent unilateral or bilateral nasal breathing impairment. Possible concomitant complaints are described above (see 1.6).
2) Physical examination findings: anterior rhinoscopy visually reveals nasal septum deviation and its displacement from the midline, altered intranasal anatomy due to the deformation of other intranasal structures, and subtotal or total nasal obstruction.
3) Instrumental examination data (endoscopic endonasal examination of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx, radiography of the paranasal sinuses, or spiral computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses) visualize the nasal septum deformity, as well as the potential resulting deformation of other intranasal structures.
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
The main complaint of patients with nasal septum deformity is persistent unilateral or bilateral nasal breathing impairment. A number of potential concomitant complaints are described in section 1.6. In young children who have not yet developed speech skills, the main manifestations of nasal breathing difficulty are assessed based on the report of a parent/guardian.
2.2 Physical Examination
It is recommended that all patients complaining of nasal breathing difficulty undergo an initial appointment (examination, consultation) with an otorhinolaryngologist to assess the state of the nasal cavity and nasal septum and determine further management tactics [11].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: during the otorhinolaryngologist's examination, anterior rhinoscopy is routinely performed. During anterior rhinoscopy, the following anatomical structures must be evaluated: the nasal septum and its position, and the condition of adjacent anatomical structures (inferior and middle nasal conchae, condition of the nasal mucosa).
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
Not indicated for initial diagnostics.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
It is recommended to perform an endoscopic endonasal examination of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx in all patients (if necessary equipment is available) to assess the localization of the nasal septum deformity, concomitant changes in other intranasal structures, and the condition of the nasopharynx [12].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
2.5 Other Procedures
Not indicated for initial diagnostics.
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
3.1 Surgical Treatment
It is recommended to perform septoplasty or nasal septal plastic surgery using video-endoscopic technologies in patients with nasal septum deformity when indications are present and contraindications are absent, with the aim of restoring nasal breathing [15,16,18].
Grade of Recommendation – 2 (Level of Evidence – B)
Comments: a characteristic feature of the pediatric and adolescent age groups is the presence of active growth zones with elevated mitotic activity—the sphenodorsal and spheno-osteo growth zones. Therefore, in pediatric and adolescent patients, gentle-approach principles must be observed: minimal resection and tissue caution during pressure and mucosal detachment in the projection of growth zones. Excessive resection in the anterior parts of the nasal septum due to the supportive function of the anterosuperior region of the caudal nasal septum, as well as damage to the sphenodorsal and spheno-osteo zones, leads to deformities of the external nose and the middle third of the face. Endoscopic or microscopic techniques are advisable as methods of intraoperative visualization. Surgical treatment in children under 12 years of age can be performed in tertiary-level healthcare facilities.
For individual indications, in patients with severe deformity of the nasal septum and nasal bones, patients with pronounced caudal deviation of the septum, patients with upper nasal septum deformities, and in cases of high risks of an unsatisfactory result or incomplete correction of the nasal septum deformity during septoplasty, rhinoseptoplasty or rhinoseptoplasty using video-endoscopic technologies or other visualization methods is recommended. In such situations, it is necessary to establish interdisciplinary collaboration at all stages of diagnosis, surgical treatment, and rehabilitation of this category of patients in conjunction with a plastic surgeon [3,11,17,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28].
3.2 Other Treatment
It is recommended to perform nasal mucus suction in all patients in the postoperative period to clear the nasal passages of accumulated fibrin, mucous, and hemorrhagic discharge, as well as to prevent the formation of synechiae between the nasal septum and nasal conchae [29,30].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to use septal splints (sterile intranasal splint for the nasal septum) in the postoperative period in the presence of individual indications in adult and pediatric patients to prevent the formation of nasal cavity synechiae [30].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to use medications for improving nasal breathing for a short duration in adult and pediatric patients in the postoperative period [32,33].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comment: as medicinal products for improving nasal breathing in the postoperative period, the following drugs are acceptable for use: Xylometazoline** (ATX code: R01AA07), Xylometazoline in combination with other drugs (ATX code: R01AB Sympathomimetics in combination with other drugs, excluding corticosteroids), Phenylephrine (ATX code: R01AA04), Phenylephrine in combination with other drugs (ATX code: R01AB Sympathomimetics in combination with other drugs, excluding corticosteroids), Oxymetazoline (ATX code: R01AA05). Dosage and frequency of administration in adult and pediatric patients are carried out in accordance with the instructions. Nasal irrigation with saline solutions (ATX code: B05CB) or sterile seawater (ATX code: R01AX10) is recommended for all patients in the postoperative period to remove accumulations of fibrin, hemorrhagic, and serous discharge from the nasal passages [34,35,36,37].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: other drug groups may be used in the presence of individual indications.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
Not indicated.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
Regarding the duration of dispensary follow-up and the frequency of postoperative examinations, there are currently no specifically formulated recommendations. Based on established clinical observation experience, it is advisable to conduct scheduled examinations during the first year after surgery.
It is recommended to implement general social measures for injury prevention in childhood, as well as explanatory work with parents in preschool and educational institutions, to prevent nasal septum deformity in children [38,39].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: general social measures for injury prevention include organizing safe leisure activities for children and adolescents, organizing safe road traffic, etc. Parents should be informed about the possibility of developing concomitant diseases and the need for timely surgical treatment of nasal septum deformity in children.
6. Organization of Medical Care
Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization:
Hospitalization is recommended for elective surgical treatment for persistent nasal breathing difficulty caused by nasal septum deformity confirmed by examination results: rhinoscopy, or endoscopic endonasal examination of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx, and radiography of the paranasal sinuses, or computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses and larynx.
Specific indications for hospitalization in pediatric age:
1) Persistent nasal breathing difficulty in a child, unilateral or bilateral, and/or presence of sleep apnea, unrelated to other causes, according to the report of the parent/guardian.
2) Nasal septum deformity confirmed by instrumental diagnostic methods (endoscopic endonasal revision of the nasal cavity and nasopharynx, and computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses and larynx).
3) Surgical treatment in children under 12 years of age may be performed in tertiary-level healthcare facilities within the medical care delivery system.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:
1) Absence of purulent-inflammatory processes in the nasal cavity.
2) Absence of local and systemic complications.
7. Additional Information
None.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
Criteria for evaluating the quality of primary health care
No. | Quality assessment criteria | Evaluation of compliance |
|---|---|---|
1. | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by anotorhinolaryngologist was completed. | Yes/No |
Criteria for evaluating the quality of specialized medical care
No. | Quality assessment criteria | Evaluation of compliance |
|---|---|---|
1. | Septoplasty or nasal septum plastic surgery using video-endoscopic technologies was performed in the absence of contraindications. | Yes/No |
References
Show references
Gray L.P. Deviated nasal septum incidence and etiology. Annals of Otology, Rhinology &; Laryngology. 1978; Vol. 87(3):3–20.
Brain, David (1992). The Etiology of Neonatal Septal Deviations. Facial Plastic Surgery, 8(4), 191–193.
Bogomilsky M.R., Yunusov A.S. Rhinoseptoplasty in childhood and adolescence. Moscow: Gamma Publishing House; 2001. 125 p.
Romoozi E., Molaee M., Rahimi H., & Karimian A. The prevalence of nasal septum deviation and its association with maxillary sinus mucosal thickening using cone-beam computed tomography. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2022; 6(S7):6258–6270.
Harugop A.S., Mudhol R.S., Hajare P.S. et al. Prevalence of Nasal Septal Deviation in New-borns and Its Precipitating Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 64:248–251.
Cottle M. Modified nasal septum operations. Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Monthly. 1950; Vol. 29, N 5. P. 480–484.
Mladina R. The role of maxilla morphology in the development of pathological septal deformities. Rhinology. 1987; 25:199-205.
Piskunov V.S. On the classification of nasal septum deformations. Rossiyskaya Otorinolaringologiya. 2009; 1(38):112-116.
Lopatin A.S. Development of methods for endonasal corrective surgery. Review. MRZh. Section XIII. 1986; 9:15–19.
Alghamdi F.S., Albogami D., Alsurayhi A.S., Alshibely A.Y., Alkaabi T.H., Alqurashi L.M., Alahdal A.A., Saber A.A., Almansouri O.S. Nasal Septal Deviation: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Cureus. 2022 Nov 10;14(11).
Otorhinolaryngology: National Guidelines / ed. by V.T. Palchun. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2008.
Richard A.Lebowitz; Suzanne K.Doud Galli; Roy A.Holliday; Joseph B.Jacobs. (2001). Nasal septal deviation: A comparison of clinical and radiological evaluation. , 12(2), 104–106.
Karataş D., Yüksel F., Şentürk M., & Doğan M. (2013). The contribution of computed tomography to nasal septoplasty. The Journal of craniofacial surgery, 24(5), 1549–1551.
Setzen G., Ferguson B. J., Han J. K., Rhee J. S., Cornelius R. S., Froum S. J., Gillman G. S., Houser S. M., Krakovitz P. R., Monfared,A., Palmer J. N., Rosbe K. W., Setzen M., & Patel M. M. (2012). Clinical consensus statement: appropriate use of computed tomography for paranasal sinus disease. Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 147(5), 808–816.
Moore M., Eccles R. Objective evidence for the efficacy of surgical management of the deviated septum as a treatment for chronic nasal obstruction: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Apr;36(2):106-13.
Alessandri-Bonetti M., Costantino A., Cottone G., et al. Efficacy of Septoplasty in Patients with Nasal Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2023;133(12):3237-3246.
Grachev N.S., Zyabkin I.V., Frolov S.V., Polev G.A., Magomedova A.M., Ataeva D.M., Galkina T.A. Surgical correction of post-traumatic deformations of nasal structures in adolescent athletes. Meditsina Ekstremalnykh Situatsiy. 2021;(12):12-16.
Singh A., Patel N., Kenyon G., Donaldson G. Is there objective evidence that septal surgery improves nasal airflow? J Laryngol Otol. 2006 Nov;120(11):916-20.
Kopacheva-Barsova G., Nikolovski N. Justification for Rhinoseptoplasty in Children - Our 10 Years Overview. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2016 Sep 15;4(3):397-403.
Dispenza F., Saraniti C., Sciandra D., Kulamarva G., Dispenza C. Management of naso-septal deformity in childhood: long-term results. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009;36(6):665-670.
Cingi C., Muluk N.B., Ulusoy S., et al. Septoplasty in children. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016;30(2):42-47.
Verwoerd C.D., Verwoerd-Verhoef H.L. Rhinosurgery in children: developmental and surgical aspects of the growing nose. Laryngorhinootologie. 2010;89(1 Suppl 1):46-48.
Zyabkin I.V., Karpova E.P. Microendoscopic septoplasty in children. Rossiyskaya Rinologiya. 2004;(3):9-11.
Althobaiti K. H., Fida A. R., Almahmoudi A., AlGhamdi D., & Alharbi M. (2022). Common Causes of Failed Septoplasty: A Systematic Review. Cureus, 14(12
Constantine F. C., Ahmad J., Geissler P., & Rohrich R. J. (2014). Simplifying the management of caudal septal deviation in rhinoplasty. Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 134(3), 379e–388e.
Haack J., & Papel I. D. (2009). Caudal septal deviation. Otolaryngologic clinics of North America, 42(3), 427–436.
Nazim Cerkes, The Crooked Nose: Principles of Treatment, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Volume 31, Issue 2, February 2011, Pages 241–257
Kosins,A. M., Daniel R. K., & Nguyen D. P. (2016). Rhinoplasty: The Asymmetric Crooked Nose-An Overview. Facial plastic surgery : FPS, 32(4), 361–373.
Tsarapkin G.Y., Turovsky A.B., Yanyushkina E.S. Optimization of postoperative management of patients undergoing septoplasty and radiofrequency inferior turbinate reduction. Rossiyskaya Otorinolaringologiya. 2008;(5):162-166.
Kim S.J. et al. Efficacy of nasal septal splints for preventing complications after septoplasty: A meta-analysis // American Journal of Otolaryngology. 2021. Vol. 42, № 3. P.38-39.
Vasina L.A. Restoration of the structure and functions of the nasal mucosa in the postoperative period in patients with nasal septum deviation and chronic hypertrophic rhinitis. Vestnik Otorinolaringologii. 2009;(2):33-35.
Dağli E., Ocak E., Mirici E., Kaya M., Acar A. Effects of early postoperative nasal decongestant on symptom relief after septoplasty. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018 Dec;8(12):1476-1480.
Dawood M.H., Feroz S., Sohail S., Roshan M., Perveen H., Nizam T. Efficacy of 0.1% Xylometazoline-Hydrochloride Nasal Decongestant Spray in Postoperative Sign/Symptom Relief Following Septoplasty: A Randomized Control Trial. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal. 2024;
Svistushkin V.M., Nikiforova G.N., Shevchik E.A., Zolotova A.V. The use of irrigation therapy after surgical interventions in the nasal cavity. Vestnik Otorinolaringologii. 2021;86(5):63–69.
Kurtaran H., Ugur K.S., Yilmaz C.S., Kaya M., Yuksel A., Ark N., & Gunduz, M. (2018). The effect of different nasal irrigation solutions following septoplasty and concha radiofrequency: a prospective randomized study. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology, 84(2), 185–190.
Süslü N., Bajin M. D., Süslü A. E., & Oğretmenoğlu, O. (2009). Effects of buffered 2.3%, buffered 0.9%, and non-buffered 0.9% irrigation solutions on nasal mucosa after septoplasty. European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 266(5)
Tarasova G.D., Mirzabekyan E.V., Garashchenko T.I. A differentiated approach to the use of irrigation-elimination therapy. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2015;(3):24-27.
Rocchi Giovanni MD, Fadda Maria Teresa DMD, Marianetti Tito Matteo MD, Reale Gabriele MD, Iannetti Giorgio MD. Craniofacial Trauma in Adolescents: Incidence, Etiology, and Prevention. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care 62(2):p 404-409, February 2007.
C.E. Zimmermann; M.J. Troulis; L.B. Kaban. (2006). Pediatric facial fractures: recent advances in prevention, diagnosis and management, 35(1), 0–13.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Yunusov A.S., MD, Professor, Member of the National Medical Association of Otorhinolaryngologists, no conflict of interest;
Artyushkin S.A., MD, Professor, Member of the National Medical Association of Otorhinolaryngologists, no conflict of interest;
Zyabkin I.V., MD, Member of the National Medical Association of Otorhinolaryngologists, no conflict of interest;
Grachev N.S., MD, Professor, Member of the National Medical Association of Otorhinolaryngologists, no conflict of interest;
Averbukh V.M., PhD, Associate Professor, Member of the National Medical Association of Otorhinolaryngologists, no conflict of interest;
Ivoylov A.Y., MD, Member of the National Medical Association of Otorhinolaryngologists, no conflict of interest;
Dzhamaludinov Y.A., MD, Member of the National Medical Association of Otorhinolaryngologists, no conflict of interest;
Tovmasyan A.S., PhD, Member of the National Medical Association of Otorhinolaryngologists, no conflict of interest.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience of these clinical guidelines:
1) general practitioners (family physicians);
2) otorhinolaryngologists;
3) otolaryngologist-audiologists;
4) pediatricians;
5) municipal (district) pediatricians;
6) district pediatricians;
7) emergency medical physicians;
8) senior physicians of emergency medical stations (departments);
9) internal medicine physicians;
10) adolescent medicine physicians;
11) district internal medicine physicians;
12) occupational health district internal medicine physicians;
13) ship doctors.
Table 1. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for prevention, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitation interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Grades of Recommendation (GoR) scale for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitation interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
1. These clinical guidelines were developed taking into account the following regulatory legal documents:
Procedure for the provision of medical care in the profile «otorhinolaryngology»: Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 905n dated November 12, 2012, «On approval of the Procedure for the provision of medical care to the population in the profile „otorhinolaryngology“».
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix C. Patient Information
Septoplasty or nasal septum plastic surgery is a surgical procedure to correct a deviated nasal septum. The nasal septum consists of a thin cartilaginous plate anteriorly and bone plates posteriorly.
Nasal breathing difficulty is not always caused solely by a deviated septum—there are numerous other potential causes of nasal obstruction. The necessity of a specific surgery to improve nasal breathing can only be determined by an otorhinolaryngologist.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
No.