Pelvic Ring Injuries: Clinical Guidelines

Applies toadults, children2024 editionS30.0, S32.1, S32.2, S32.3…

Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults, children. 2024 edition, ICD-10 codes: S30.0, S32.1, S32.2, S32.3…. On this page — abridged version by WhiteCoat Pro and the full official text.

Receive research articles on "Pelvic Ring Injuries"Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in English, with numbers, sample sizes, and conclusions. Plus updates on changes in Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary based on the 2024 guideline text. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

Pelvic ring injuries are frequently associated with high-energy trauma and can rapidly become complicated by massive intra-pelvic hemorrhage, especially in the presence of pelvic and hemodynamic instability. This guideline focuses on rapid diagnosis, primary stabilization and hemostasis, timing of fixation, complication prevention, and rehabilitation.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Determine the fact and mechanism of trauma, especially high-energy trauma, complaints of pain and pelvic deformity, hemorrhages, inability to move the legs, and impaired weight-bearing capacity. → in text
  2. Assess the patient's position, external rotation of the feet, leg flexion, pelvic asymmetry, limb shortening, condition of the skin and soft tissues; look for signs of intra-pelvic hemorrhage, perineal hematoma, rectal or urethral bleeding. If instability is suspected, pelvic stress maneuvers should be performed with caution, as they may exacerbate hemorrhage. → in text
  3. No later than 1 hour after admission, document somatic and local status, blood pressure, temperature, and VTE risk (Level of Evidence C, Grade of Recommendation 5). Inspect the urethra before catheterization; perform perineal and digital rectal examinations if rectal injury is suspected. → in text
  4. Perform a complete blood count, blood chemistry panel, and coagulation profile; in moderate and severe trauma, perform acid-base and blood gas analysis. Lactate and base deficit help assess the severity of shock and response to intensive care (Level of Evidence B, Grade of Recommendation 3). In unstable trauma, TEG and ROTEM are performed for early detection of coagulopathy, if equipment is available (Level of Evidence A, Grade of Recommendation 2). → in text
  5. To detect pelvic bone injuries, perform radiography and/or CT; pelvic CT is considered the "gold standard" of diagnosis. In stable hemodynamics, radiography and/or CT clarify pelvic injuries, morphology, and features of acetabular fractures (Level of Evidence B, Grade of Recommendation 3). → in text
  6. In hemodynamic instability, perform comprehensive ultrasound of internal organs to search for other sources of hemorrhage (Level of Evidence A, Grade of Recommendation 1), and pelvic radiography and/or CT without delaying life-saving measures (Level of Evidence B, Grade of Recommendation 3). If intra-pelvic hemorrhage is suspected and the patient's condition permits, CT with intravenous bolus contrast and consultation with a cardiovascular surgeon and/or interventional radiologist are required (Level of Evidence C, Grade of Recommendation 5). → in text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

When should a pelvic binder be applied and when should it be removed?

If there are signs of pelvic ring injury, the binder should be applied as early as possible, preferably at the scene. It is removed at the first physiological opportunity and replaced with external or definitive fixation; the binder should not be left on until morning. → in text

Can a CT scan be performed in the presence of hemodynamic instability?

Pelvic radiography and/or CT is performed to identify life-threatening injuries, but the imaging should not delay the correction of life-threatening consequences. Contrast-enhanced CT is performed when intrapelvic hemorrhage is suspected, if the patient's condition permits. → in text

When is immediate urinary catheterization contraindicated?

In the presence of gross hematuria, perineal hematoma, blood at the urethral meatus, or other suspicion of urogenital injury, a urology consultation is required first, followed by retrograde urethrocystography or cystography as indicated. Transurethral catheterization without prior evaluation may exacerbate a urethral rupture. → in text

When is preperitoneal pelvic packing indicated?

Pelvic ring stabilization is performed first. In cases of hemodynamic instability and predominantly venous retroperitoneal bleeding, preperitoneal packing is indicated; secondary angioembolization may be required if bleeding persists. → in text

How to perform VTE prophylaxis after a pelvic fracture?

In conservative management, low-molecular-weight heparins are preferred, starting within the first 24 hours after injury; prophylaxis is continued for more than 1 month. After surgery, LMWHs are started as early as possible within the first 24 hours after injury, once hemostasis is achieved and the bleeding risk is low, for a minimum of 4 weeks; if necessary, for the entire period of immobilization. → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
857, version 1 (ID 857_1)
Publication date
December 19, 2024
Age category
adults, children
ICD-10 codes
S30.0S32.1S32.2S32.3S32.4S32.5S32.7S32.8S33.2S33.4S33.6S33.7T91.2
Specialties
Traumatology and Orthopedics
Developers
Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedists of Russia
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Guidelines — 857_1

Shortened Clinical Guidelines: Pelvic Ring Injuries

A condensed version of this guideline from WhiteCoat Pro — 38 pages: every section of the document is retold briefly and in its own words, with tests and fill-in-the-blanks for self-assessment. Necessary when you need not just to read the guideline, but to learn it — for an exam, accreditation exam, or clinical practice.
All abbreviated CPGs: 300
Beginning of abbreviated version — open

1.1 Definition

  • Pelvic fracture — disruption of the integrity of the pelvic bones caused by external forces or traumatic factors.
  • Sacroiliac joint dislocation — disruption of the congruence of the articular surfaces of the ilium and sacrum caused by a mechanical factor.

1.2 Etiology and Pathogenesis

Etiology (injury mechanisms):

  • High-energy impact (main mechanism): falls from height (catatrauma), motor vehicle accidents (MVA: pedestrian, driver, passenger, motorcyclist, bicyclist), sports injuries, compression (crushing) by a vehicle or a massive object.
  • Low-energy impact: occurs predominantly in elderly individuals and patients with underlying bone tissue diseases.

Clinical and epidemiological data:

  • Up to 15% of patients with pelvic fractures are admitted to the emergency department in a state of shock.
  • Up to 1/3 of patients admitted in shock die.
  • Main causes of death: massive hemorrhage, irreversible consumptive coagulopathy, exhaustion of the body's compensatory reserves.

Pathogenesis:

  • Trauma causes disruption of the integrity and stability of the pelvic ring.
  • There is an increase in the volume of the pelvic space (most pronounced in "open-book" type injuries).
  • Mechanism of massive blood loss: injury to blood vessels and soft tissues against the background of an increased pelvic volume leads to a decrease in the "biological tamponade" effect. This contributes to increased bleeding into the retroperitoneal space.
  • Anatomical note: the lesser pelvis and retroperitoneal space can accommodate up to several liters of blood, which causes severe hemodynamic disorders.

Hemodynamic assessment criteria:

  • Normal hemodynamic status: absence of signs of hypoperfusion and no need for infusion therapy or blood transfusion to maintain blood pressure (BP).
  • Hemodynamic stability: a condition in which a stable blood pressure is maintained or tends to improve (text cuts off on the page).

Target hemodynamic parameters (during infusion therapy)

  • Blood pressure (BP): > 90 mm Hg
  • Pulse (HR): < 100 bpm

Epidemiology of pelvic ring injuries

  • Prevalence: 3–5% of all musculoskeletal injuries.
  • Risk group (high-energy trauma): predominantly young patients.
  • Severity of condition: characterized by a high Injury Severity Score (ISS) — 25–48 points.
  • Mortality: high, especially in unstable injuries with significant displacement.
  • Pathogenesis of the life-threatening condition: massive retroperitoneal hemorrhage rightarrow rapid exsanguination rightarrow severe hemodynamic impairment.

Features of pelvic trauma in pediatric patients

  • Frequency: 0.4–4% of all skeletal injuries in children (or 4.2 cases per 100,000 children).
  • Predominant type of injury: avulsion injuries.
  • Mechanism: tension of muscle groups attached to the apophyseal regions of the pelvic ring.
  • Unstable injuries: caused by high-energy mechanisms (MVA, fall from height).

ICD-10 Coding

  • S30.0 Contusion of lower back and pelvis.
  • S32.1 Fracture of sacrum.
  • S32.2 Fracture of coccyx.
  • S32.3 Fracture of ilium.
  • S32.30 Closed fracture of ilium.
  • S32.4 Fracture of acetabulum.
  • S32.5 Fracture of pubis.
  • S32.7 Multiple fractures of lumbosacral spine and pelvis.
The official full text of the guideline below remains open and free. Only the condensed study version as a whole is paid: section-by-section explanations, self-assessment tests, and integration with platform materials.

List of Abbreviations

AO — aortic balloon occlusion;

EFS — external fixation system;

AG — angiography;

BP – blood pressure;

AE — angioembolization;

PPX — preperitoneal pelvic packing;

IL — interleukin;

CT – computed tomography;

ICU — intensive care unit;

RCT — randomized controlled trial;

ROTEM — rotational thromboelastometry;

X-ray — pelvic radiography;

RUG — retrograde urethrogram;

PB — pelvic binder;

TEG — thromboelastography;

LOE — level of evidence;

TBI — traumatic brain injury;

REBOA — resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta;

AIS — Abbreviated Injury Scale;

APC — anteroposterior compression injuries;

ATLS – Advanced Trauma Life Support;

BD — base deficit;

CM — combined mechanism injuries;

DCO — Damage Control Orthopaedics;

DSA — Digital Subtraction Angiography;

EAST — The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma;

eFAST — extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma;

ISS — Injury Severity Score;

LC — lateral compression injuries;

REBOA — resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta;

iREBOA — intermittent REBOA;

pREBOA — partial REBOA;

VS — vertical shear injuries;

WSES — World Society of Emergency Surgery.

Terms and Definitions

Apophyseolysis — injury to the growth plate located between the apophysis and its parent bone.

External fixation system (EFS) — an orthopedic device comprising an implant (transosseous or extracortical element reaching and penetrating the bone) and an external (non-implantable) support connecting bone fragments via elements protruding through soft tissues and skin during the treatment of fractures, pseudoarthrosis, or gradual lengthening (deformity correction) of a segment.

Internal fixation device — an orthopedic implant placed on the bone beneath the patient's soft tissues to connect bone fragments in the treatment of fractures, deformities, or pseudoarthrosis.

High-energy trauma — injuries resulting from high kinetic energy impact

Hemostasis — a sequence of tightly regulated processes that maintain blood in a fluid state and induce the rapid formation of a local thrombus at the site of vascular injury.

Hypoperfusion — poor microcirculation, inadequate blood supply to a specific organ: brain, kidneys, etc.

Catatrauma — a type of injury sustained from falling from a height.

Hemodynamic instability — according to the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol, a condition defined by the following signs: blood pressure <90 mm Hg and pulse >120 bpm, signs of skin vasoconstriction (cold, clammy skin, decreased capillary refill), hypothermia, altered mental status, and/or tachypnea [25, 26].

Unstable pelvic injuries — pelvic injuries accompanied by disruption of the pelvic ring integrity with fragment displacement and pathological mobility. Depending on the mechanism of injury, vertically unstable and rotationally unstable fractures may occur. Vertically unstable injuries present with complete disruption of the posterior complex with vertical displacement of a hemipelvis. Rotationally unstable injuries involve incomplete disruption of the posterior complex while maintaining the connection between the hemipelvis and the axial skeleton, accompanied by rotational displacement of the ilium in the horizontal and sagittal planes.

Stable pelvic injuries — pelvic injuries not accompanied by disruption of the pelvic ring integrity, and fractures without fragment displacement or pathological mobility.

Verneuil's sign — pain in the region of injury upon transverse compression of the pelvic bones.

Larrey's sign — pain at the site of pelvic bone fracture when the iliac crests are manually pulled apart.

Decreased capillary refill — the appearance of a persistent white spot on the skin of the patient's dorsum of the foot or hand after finger pressure; observed in vascular insufficiency of the distal extremities and impaired sympathetic innervation.

Fixation stability — the resistance of the system to external loads, allowing it to maintain constant relative orientation of fragments and optimal distance or direct contact between them.

Pelvis — the bony ring formed by two hip bones, the sacrum, and the coccyx. The pelvis serves as a support for the trunk and lower extremities and houses several internal organs.

Fixation — a state in which relative or complete immobilization of fragments is achieved, ensuring relative or absolute stability.

Shock — a stereotyped, phase-developing pathological process resulting from neurohumoral regulation disorders caused by extreme stimuli (mechanical trauma, burn, electrical injury, etc.) and characterized by a drastic reduction in tissue blood supply disproportionate to metabolic needs, hypoxia, and depression of body functions.

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Pelvic fracture — a disruption of the integrity of pelvic bones under the influence of external impacts or traumatic factors.

Sacroiliac joint dislocation — disruption of the congruence of the articular surfaces of the ilium and sacrum caused by a mechanical factor.

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

Pelvic ring injuries typically result from high-energy impact, which is the primary mechanism of injury (low-energy pelvic injuries occur in elderly patients and those with bone diseases). High-energy injuries include catatrauma, sports injuries, motor vehicle accidents (pedestrian, driver, passenger, motorcyclist, bicyclist), and crushing by a vehicle or massive object [1, 5]. Up to 15% of patients with pelvic bone fractures are admitted to the hospital emergency department in shock, and up to one-third of them die [10, 25]. The causes of death in most cases are massive hemorrhage, irreversible consumption coagulopathy, and exhaustion of the body's compensatory reserves.

Pelvic ring injuries disrupt its integrity, stability, and in some cases lead to a subsequent increase in intrapelvic volume. Increased volume, particularly in open-book type injuries associated with soft tissue and vascular damage, promotes increased bleeding into the retroperitoneal space due to a reduction in the "biological tamponade" effect (the pelvic cavity and retroperitoneal space can hold up to several liters of blood) and can lead to hemodynamic compromise [7, 15, 25]. Some authors define normal hemodynamics as the absence of a need for infusion therapy or blood transfusion to maintain blood pressure (BP), as well as the absence of signs of hypoperfusion; on the other hand, hemodynamic stability is a state in which stable BP or improved parameters are achieved with infusion therapy, reaching a BP >90 mm Hg and pulse <100 bpm [23, 25].

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

Management of pelvic ring injuries is one of the most challenging problems in musculoskeletal surgery, with a prevalence of 3–5% of all injuries [1–4, 25]. High-energy pelvic fractures are most common in young patients and are characterized by a high total Injury Severity Score (ISS, 25–48 points) [3, 25]. Pelvic injuries are associated with high mortality, particularly in patients with unstable injuries and significant displacement, leading to acute hemodynamic compromise due to rapid exsanguination from massive retroperitoneal bleeding [1, 2, 4, 5].

Pelvic bone fractures in the pediatric population account for 0.4–4% of all skeletal injuries in children, or 4.2 cases per 100,000 children, according to various sources. Avulsion injuries due to tension of muscle groups attached to the apophyseal regions of the pelvic ring predominate in children. Unstable pelvic ring injuries in children are typically caused by high-energy mechanisms resulting from motor vehicle accidents and falls from height [210].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

S30.0 Contusion of lower back and pelvis.

S32.1 Fracture of sacrum.

S32.2 Fracture of coccyx.

S32.3 Fracture of ilium.

S32.30 Closed fracture of ilium.

S32.4 Fracture of acetabulum.

S32.5 Fracture of pubis.

S32.7 Multiple fractures of lumbar spine and pelvis.

S32.70 Closed multiple fractures of lumbar spine and pelvis.

S32.8 Fractures of other and unspecified parts of lumbar spine and pelvis.

S33.2 Luxation of sacroiliac joint and sacrococcygeal symphysis.

S33.4 Traumatic rupture of pubic symphysis [pubic symphysis rupture].

S33.6 Sprain and strain of capsule-ligamentous apparatus of sacroiliac joint.

S33.7 Sprain and strain of capsule-ligamentous apparatus of other and unspecified parts of lumbar spine and pelvis.

T91.2 Sequelae of other fractures of thorax and pelvis.

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

The treatment strategy for patients with pelvic trauma is determined not by the presence of a fracture per se, but by the degree and direction of fragment displacement [25]. Classifications that combine the mechanism of injury, the primary direction of the traumatic force, and typical pelvic ring injuries (anteroposterior compression, APC; lateral compression, LC; vertical shear, VS; combined mechanism, CM) allow predicting the individual response in terms of severity: mild, moderate, and severe, and, importantly, the hemodynamic status.

According to the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification, pelvic ring injuries are divided into 3 classes [25]:

Mild pelvic injuries: WSES grade I includes APC-I, LC-I, and pelvic ring injuries in hemodynamically stable patients.

Moderate pelvic injuries:

  • WSES grade II includes APC II-III and LC II-III mechanically unstable pelvic ring injuries in hemodynamically stable patients.

  • WSES grade III includes VS and CM mechanically unstable pelvic ring injuries in hemodynamically stable patients.

Severe pelvic injuries: WSES grade IV includes any pelvic ring injuries in hemodynamically unstable patients, regardless of mechanical stability.

The classification presented in Table 1 takes into account the Young-Burgess classification (Fig. 1), hemodynamic status, and associated injuries.

Table 1. World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) classification of pelvic injuries

Injury grade

Young-Burgess classification

Hemodynamics

Mechanical stability

CT

First-line treatment

MILD

Grade I

APC I — LC I

Stable

Stable

Yes

Non-operative treatment — bed rest

MODERATE

Grade II

LC II/III,

APC II/III

Stable

Unstable

Yes

Pelvic binder («improvised») at the scene

± Angioembolization (in case of extravasation on CT)

Surgery: Anterior external fixation frame

Grade III

VS, CM

Stable

Unstable

Yes

Pelvic binder («improvised») at the scene

± Angioembolization (in case of extravasation on CT)

Surgery:

- Stabilization of the pelvic ring - Correction of vertical displacement — closed reduction

- Application of external fixation devices

SEVERE

Grade IV

Any type of injury

Unstable

Any type

No

Pelvic binder («improvised») at the scene

Emergency stabilization Mechanical pelvic fixation Preperitoneal pelvic packing

± Mechanical fixation

± REBOA

± Angioembolization

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition — Pelvic Ring Injuries

Figure 1. Young-Burgess classification of pelvic injuries

The AO classification, which distinguishes three types of fractures, is generally accepted.

  • Type A stable pelvic ring injuries with osteoligamentous integrity of the posterior pelvic ring and intact pelvic floor; the pelvis will not displace under physiological loads.

  • Type B rotationally unstable pelvic ring injuries with partially preserved stability of the posterior pelvic ring.

  • Type C translationally unstable pelvic ring injuries with disruption of all posterior osteoligamentous structures and pelvic floor injury. The direction of displacement (vertical, posterior, distractive, excessive rotation) plays a subordinate role. The pelvic ring is disrupted anteriorly and posteriorly, and the affected side is unstable.

In children and adolescents, in addition to the classifications mentioned above, avulsion fractures, which represent apophyseolyses, should be noted. Most commonly, these injuries, classified as simple or type A, occur in the region of the anterior superior and anterior inferior iliac spines, and less frequently at the ischial tuberosity.

Complicated pelvic ring injuries are pelvic injuries associated with severe soft tissue trauma, injury to pelvic hollow organs, vascular injury, and/or urinary tract injury. It is also necessary to distinguish between open and closed pelvic injuries. The following pelvic ring injuries should be considered open.

  • primarily open pelvic ring injury, when there is communication between the injury site and the skin and/or vaginal mucosa and/or anorectal region;

  • closed pelvic ring injury with performed minor pelvis packing to stop bleeding;

  • closed pelvic ring injury with documented contamination of the retroperitoneal space resulting from intra-abdominal trauma.

In contrast, pelvic ring injuries with isolated bladder or urethral trauma should be considered complicated rather than open injuries. Open pelvic injuries carry a high mortality rate (approximately 45%) due to associated intra-abdominal injuries with the risk of acute exsanguination, as well as delayed sepsis.

Identification of unstable pelvic ring injuries

Instability, particularly of the posterior pelvic ring, is accompanied by a tendency toward massive hemorrhage from the presacral venous plexus. In this case, it is important to differentiate between isolated mechanical instability of the pelvic ring and hemodynamic instability, although both may occur simultaneously. If signs of pelvic instability are present, the hemodynamic status must be closely monitored. Pelvic ring instability should be assessed by applying pressure to the iliac wing, which results in inward or outward displacement. In cases of translational (vertical and horizontal) instability, craniocaudal mobility in the horizontal plane or anteroposterior mobility in the sagittal plane may be observed. In addition to an increased risk of hemorrhage, pelvic ring instability can lead to further complications such as thrombosis and secondary injuries to nerves, vessels, and pelvic organs. The latter may result from the primary trauma and must be ruled out during the diagnostic evaluation of patients with unstable pelvic injuries. Stabilization of the pelvic ring should be performed as early as possible. Depending on the patient's condition, this may be a rapid damage control orthopedics (DCO) procedure using external fixation or primary definitive internal fixation (which is more labor-intensive). However, there is a general consensus that mechanical stabilization (regardless of the method) has the highest priority and ideally should be performed at the scene of the injury. Hemostasis is of equally high priority and should be performed according to available alternatives.

Signs of pelvic ring instability can be identified on plain pelvic radiographs. These include, for example, widening of the pubic symphysis or sacroiliac joints. Horizontal or vertical displacement of the iliac wings should also be considered a sign of instability. It should be kept in mind that the displacement is often much greater at the time of injury than during diagnosis. Therefore, a fracture of the L5 transverse process should be evaluated as a sign of instability in the presence of a pelvic ring injury, even if there is no iliac wing displacement. It should also be noted that a properly positioned pelvic binder or belt may mask pelvic ring instability. The direction of pelvic ring instability is important for classification. If only rotational instability is present, it is a type B injury. If there is instability in both the vertical and horizontal planes, it is a type C injury.

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

The assessment of pelvic injury severity should be based on the mechanism of injury (especially in high-energy trauma, which is more common in mechanical injuries) and physical examination findings aimed at identifying and analyzing traumatic foci of the pelvic ring, detecting intra-pelvic hemorrhage from retroperitoneal or perineal hematomas, or rectal/urethral bleeding [1, 25]. The clinical presentation upon examination is significant: forced position of the patient; external rotation of the feet; semi-flexed position of the legs at the hip and knee joints (Volkovich sign); pelvic asymmetry; limb shortening. Of particular importance is the analysis of skin and soft tissue integrity, the damage to which indicates an open fracture.

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

It is recommended that in all patients with pelvic injuries and hemodynamic instability, the time from hospital admission to definitive control of intra-pelvic hemorrhage be minimized in order to improve treatment outcomes [25].

RG CLE 5Recommendation Grade C (Level of Evidence 5).

Comment: It should be noted that only unstable pelvic ring injuries are accompanied by hemodynamic instability. The diagnostic workflow in the trauma bay should be standardized and optimized to avoid delays in definitive hemorrhage control. It has been demonstrated that the time from injury to arrival in the operating room is inversely correlated with the survival of patients with intra-pelvic hemorrhage [25].

Criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition:

  1. Complaints: pain, pelvic deformity, bruising, inability to move the legs, impaired weight-bearing capacity of the extremity(ies).

  2. History: presence of trauma.

  3. Physical examination: Palpation reveals: tenderness at the site of the pelvic fracture; pain aggravated by weight-bearing and lower extremity movements; positive Larrey sign; positive Verneuil sign; positive sticking heel sign (Gorynevsky sign), forced position of the lower extremities (Volkovich sign), tenderness upon palpation (Marx sign), reverse gait sign (Lozinsky sign), Zyryanova signs, Lelly maneuver (pelvic ring stress test) may be useful in assessing pelvic ring stability, but it should be performed with caution as it can occasionally exacerbate bleeding due to bone fragment displacement [25]. It is recommended to perform a radiographic examination, especially in patients with hemodynamic instability, limiting it to an external inspection and medical history. A careful vaginal and rectal examination, as well as inspection of the urethra prior to catheter insertion, should be performed. In avulsion fractures in children, weight-bearing capacity of the lower extremity on the affected side may be preserved in combination with a limp. Depending on the location of the injury, specific movements associated with the contraction of a muscle attached to the apophysis cause pain projected to the site of apophysiolysis ( ischial tuberosity, anterior superior iliac spines).

  4. Laboratory tests: Laboratory parameters may be normal in mild injuries; in unstable injuries assessed dynamically: decreased hemoglobin and erythrocyte counts, elevated leukocyte count and ESR, elevated lactate, changes in acid-base status, blood gas parameters, and thromboelastography.

  5. Instrumental examination:

Radiography in the anteroposterior view, additional pelvic inlet view (X-ray tube angled at 30–45°) and pelvic outlet view (X-ray tube angled at 30–45°). For acetabular fractures, to clarify the diagnosis and determine treatment tactics when pelvic CT is unavailable, additional radiographic projections are recommended: oblique, iliac, and obturator views. For iliac and obturator views, it is not recommended to position the patient by rotating the torso or the X-ray tube by 30–45 degrees right and left as described in the classical method by E. Letournel; the same images can be obtained by angling the central X-ray beam without changing the patient's pelvic position. This technique avoids additional trauma and worsening of the patient's condition.

Computed tomography (CT) of the pelvic bones. It is recommended for any suspected pelvic bone injury (if technically available). In polytrauma, pelvic CT is an integral part of pan-CT imaging, i.e., total skeletal tomography. FAST ultrasound: Performed on an emergency basis as rapid diagnostics to detect hematomas and ongoing hemorrhage

It is recommended that the aforementioned studies be performed as soon as possible, simultaneously, but no earlier than the initiation of infusion therapy in the emergency operating room, ideally in the trauma bay or ICU in patients with suspected pelvic ring instability and hemodynamic compromise [25].

Level CGrade 5Level of Clinical Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5).

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

Complaints and medical history are described in Section 2 "Criteria for Establishing the Diagnosis/Condition".

2.2 Physical Examination

Physical examination findings are described in Section 2 "Criteria for Establishing the Diagnosis/Condition".

  • Assessment of the following parameters in patients with suspected pelvic bone injuries for diagnostic purposes is recommended to be performed no later than 1 hour after hospital admission, with the results mandatorily documented in the medical records:

    • assessment of somatic status;

    • visual and palpation assessment of local status;

    • blood pressure measurement;

    • body temperature measurement;

    • assessment of the risk of venous thromboembolic complications [202, 209, 217, 252, 253].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

It is recommended to perform the following tests for all patients with pelvic trauma: complete blood count (CBC), general biochemical blood test, coagulogram (exploratory study of the hemostatic system, preferably thromboelastography or rotational thromboelastometry), to determine the degree of coagulopathy, assess the general condition of the patient, and as part of treatment and treatment monitoring for dynamic evaluation [29].

GCR BLOCE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

Comment: Routine laboratory tests allow assessment of the patient's general condition upon admission and implementation of drug therapy. However, hemoglobin and hematocrit levels lack sensitivity in the early assessment of the severity of traumatic shock [29].

It is recommended to perform an acid-base balance and blood gas analysis in all patients with moderate and severe pelvic trauma to assess the severity of shock; this method also allows monitoring the response to ongoing intensive care [29].

GCR BLOCE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

Comment: Sensitive laboratory markers of ongoing bleeding include serum lactate and base deficit levels obtained from arterial blood gas analysis. Serum lactate and base deficit are sensitive diagnostic markers that allow assessing the degree of traumatic and hemorrhagic shock, as well as monitoring the response to ongoing intensive care [25].

It is recommended to perform the following additional diagnostic laboratory tests in all patients with pelvic ring injuries scheduled for surgical treatment as part of the preoperative evaluation [2, 214, 215]:

  • ABO blood group determination;

  • Rh blood group (Rh factor) D antigen determination;

  • determination of antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in the blood;

  • determination of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in the blood;

  • determination of antibodies to Treponema pallidum using nontreponemal tests (RPR, VDRL) (qualitative and semi-quantitative assay) in blood serum;

  • determination of human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 IgM and IgG antibodies in the blood;

  • determination of human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 IgM and IgG antibodies in the blood.

GGR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

It is recommended to perform thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in patients with unstable pelvic trauma for the early detection of coagulopathy, provided the appropriate equipment is available, and for dynamic assessment of its progression [17, 19–22].

GCR ALOCE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence 2)

Comment: The presence of coagulopathy should be detected early using bedside tests such as TEG and ROTEM. These tests enable targeted goal-directed fluid and blood component therapy and improve survival outcomes following pelvic trauma [25].

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

It is recommended to perform a comprehensive ultrasound examination of internal organs (comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, comprehensive transvaginal and transabdominal pelvic ultrasound) in patients with pelvic injuries and hemodynamic instability to identify and dynamically assess internal organ injuries that require surgical intervention, early pelvic stabilization, early angiography, urgent measures to restore pelvic ring integrity, and/or laparotomy [1, 2, 25, 30, 31].

GPR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence 1)

Comments: In cases of hemodynamic instability, an extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) is performed to identify or exclude other sources of bleeding in the chest and abdominal cavities. [7] Guidelines from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) indicate that the extended FAST (eFAST) lacks sufficient sensitivity to rule out pelvic hemorrhage; however, this method is considered appropriate for ruling out the need for laparotomy in unstable patients [25].

It is recommended to perform pelvic radiography and/or computed tomography (CT) of the pelvic bones in hemodynamically unstable patients to identify life-threatening pelvic ring injuries and dynamically monitor the patient's condition [1, 2, 11, 18, 23, 25, 32–33].

GCR BLOCE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

Comments: Major injury patterns associated with hemodynamic instability include sacral fractures, "open-book" fractures, and vertical shear fractures of the hemipelvis (APC II-III, LC II-III, and VS). However, pelvic radiography alone is often insufficient to predict bleeding or determine the need for angiography, let alone mortality. Pelvic radiography is important not only for assessing hip dislocation, but also for evaluating the vertical displacement (subluxation/dislocation) of the hemipelvis to correctly perform the appropriate reduction maneuver. Notably, obtaining radiographs should not delay interventions aimed at correcting life-threatening consequences. The sensitivity and specificity of this diagnostic method (reported variably by different authors) are relatively low (50–68% and 98%, respectively), and the false-negative rate is high (32%), particularly in low-energy injuries and non-displaced or minimally displaced fractures. It should be noted that hemodynamic instability occurs only in unstable pelvic injuries accompanied by massive disruption of the pelvic ring. For this reason, some authors suggest omitting pelvic radiography in stable patients. Early pelvic stabilization and prompt planning of the subsequent management and diagnostic algorithm are essential for accurate morphological assessment of the injury. In hemodynamically stable patients without pelvic ring instability, hip dislocation, or positive physical examination findings who are scheduled for a CT scan, pelvic radiography may be omitted [25, 34].

It is recommended to perform pelvic radiography and/or computed tomography (CT) of the pelvic bones in patients with pelvic trauma presenting with normal or stable hemodynamics to identify pelvic injuries and acetabular fracture characteristics, as well as for dynamic monitoring [1, 2, 23, 28, 35].

GGR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

Comments: Computed tomography of the pelvic bones is the gold standard for diagnosing pelvic trauma and allows the detection of soft tissue injuries [34].

It is recommended for patients with moderate to severe pelvic trauma presenting with hemodynamic instability and suspected intrapelvic hemorrhage to undergo: computed tomography of the lesser pelvis in women / pelvic organs in men (with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement, if the patient's condition permits), and a consultation with a cardiovascular surgeon and/or endovascular surgeon/interventional radiologist to identify and localize intrapelvic bleeding, determine further management tactics, and perform dynamic monitoring if necessary [2, 28, 35].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comments: Two key factors to consider when making clinical decisions and referring a patient for pelvic angiography are the presence of contrast extravasation on contrast-enhanced CT and the size of the pelvic hematoma on unenhanced CT. CT has a 98% accuracy in identifying patients with active extravasation; however, the absence of contrast extravasation on CT does not always rule out active intrapelvic bleeding.

2.5 Other Procedures

It is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the lesser pelvis in women / pelvic organs in men with intravenous bolus administration in the presence of clinically evident hematuria, perineal hematoma, and pelvic bone injuries detected on radiography [25].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended for patients with pelvic trauma when urogenital injury is suspected, in the presence of gross hematuria, clinically evident perineal hematoma, and pelvic bone injuries detected on radiography, to obtain a urologist consultation (examination) to adjust management tactics and order additional diagnostic tests (laboratory and/or instrumental) as indicated, including ascending (retrograde) urethrography (RUG) and/or cystography to detect urethral injuries [2, 14].

GCP CLE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comments: Diagnosis of urethral injuries is quite challenging during initial assessment. About 23% of such injuries are not diagnosed in a timely manner [14, 25]. Symptoms that may accompany urethral injuries include perineal/scrotal hematoma, blood discharge from the external urethral meatus, deformation of the urinary bladder contours in the presence of an intrapelvic hematoma, and unstable pelvic injuries. Insertion of a transurethral catheter without other preliminary examinations in patients with pelvic trauma may be associated with severe consequences, either as an acute complete urethral rupture or as the development of a chronic stricture, impotence, and urinary incontinence [14, 25]. For this reason, ATLS guidelines, the World Health Organization, and several authors [14, 25] have suggested performing a retrograde urethrogram (RUG) prior to urethral catheterization. RUG is recommended in the presence of local clinical symptoms or if there are signs of rupture on plain radiographs, especially in the presence of severe soft tissue injury, displacement of bone fragments, or multiple fractures [14, 25]. In the case of a positive RUG result or when there is a high degree of suspicion for urethral injury, epicystostomy with delayed cystography is recommended [14, 25]. MRI appears promising in identifying the type of injury and can be an effective method in combination with RUG or as an alternative to RUG, but only in stable patients [14, 25]. However, the sequence of performing RUG and urethrocystography with contrast-enhanced CT has not been defined [2, 25]. Performing RUG prior to CT may increase the rate of indeterminate or false-negative CT results [2, 25]. For this reason, in cases of suspected urethral injury, delayed contrast-enhanced CT scanning with urological evaluation is recommended, provided the patient's hemodynamic status allows it [2, 25].

The high incidence of anorectal injuries necessitates a thorough examination of the anorectal region. First and foremost, perineal and digital rectal examinations should be performed to detect the presence of blood, assess rectal wall laxity, and determine if the prostate is non-palpable. If the rectal examination is positive, rigid proctoscopy should be seriously considered [3].

It is recommended that patients with any suspicion of abdominal organ or rectal injury, or even without it, undergo a diagnostic digital rectal examination, along with consultations from a general surgeon, pediatric surgeon, and/or coloproctologist [3].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: The high incidence of anorectal injuries necessitates a thorough examination of the anorectal region. First and foremost, perineal and digital rectal examinations should be performed to detect the presence of blood and assess rectal wall laxity.

It is recommended that in cases of suspected pelvic organ injury or bloody discharge from the external genital tract in women, a vaginal examination with differentiation of the causes of bleeding, along with a consultation from an obstetrician-gynecologist, be performed [205, 208].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended to perform a chest X-ray and an electrocardiogram with the recording, decoding, description, and interpretation of electrocardiographic data for all patients with pelvic ring injuries for the purpose of a general somatic examination [225].

CGR CLEL 5Clinical Guideline Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

3.1 Basic principles in the management of pelvic trauma

Treatment of pelvic ring injuries, and correspondingly for all polytrauma patients, requires a special emphasis on physiology; decisions made can be more effective with a comprehensive assessment of anatomy, the mechanical consequences of the trauma, and their physiological manifestations. In everyday clinical practice, initial decisions are made based on the assessment of the patient's clinical status and the presence of associated injuries and pelvic ring disruption. The primary goal of treatment is the restoration of disrupted physiology, while the main objectives are stopping bleeding and stabilizing hemodynamics, restoring the mechanical integrity and stability of the pelvic ring, correcting coagulation disorders, preventing the development of complications (septic, urogenital, intestinal, vascular, sexual dysfunction, gait disorders), and finally, definitive stabilization, reduction, and fixation of acetabular fractures [25].

3.2 Conservative treatment

It is recommended that patients with pelvic trauma involving vascular injury/wounding undergo measures aimed at arresting hemorrhage (pressure bandage, vascular compression), bone fracture splinting (transport immobilization), and application of an immobilization bandage for bone fractures in order to stop bleeding and stabilize hemodynamics [205, 208].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: Activity level depends on severity — 1, 2, 3.

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

The application of external fixation devices (reusable external orthopedic fixation systems) is recommended in patients with pelvic ring injuries, if the type of injury permits, for pelvic ring fixation aimed at primary stabilization and compression, limiting the pelvic cavity, and creating conditions for pelvic packing and hemostasis of cancellous bone bleeding [205, 208].

Comment: At the same time, the device does not interfere with other surgical interventions, as it can be moved to the abdomen or thighs if necessary. Further development of this area in traumatology has led to the creation of pin fixation systems that can be used for all types of unstable fractures and acetabular injuries. This allows for the rapid resuscitation of the patient and their transfer for specialized care. However, the installation of pin systems requires specific skills and mandates special training. In cases of vertical displacement of the hemipelvis, reduction is necessary prior to the placement of fixation elements. In some cases, the most effective approach is a combination of percutaneous iliosacral stabilization with cannulated screws and the application of external fixation devices to the anterior pelvic ring. Such a combination, in skilled hands, has significant advantages over the application of external fixation devices to the posterior pelvic ring.

RG CLE 5Recommendation Grade C (Level of Evidence 5).

It is not recommended to apply external fixation devices (reusable external orthopedic fixation systems) that assume lateral compression of the iliac wings in lateral compression injuries combined with a vertical comminuted fracture of the iliac wing and body [25].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comment: External fixation devices (a set of components and parts for an external fixation apparatus) with such a mechanism of action, applied to the posterior pelvic ring, usually have a C-shape similar to those proposed by Ganz [99]. In lateral compression injuries and iliac wing fractures, the application of external fixation devices (a set of components and parts for an external fixation apparatus) of this type is contraindicated.

It is recommended that during conservative treatment of patients with pelvic ring injuries, in order to minimize the risk of complications, the patient with pelvic trauma be placed supine with the hips flexed at an angle of 35-40°, knees flexed at 125-135°, and the upper torso elevated to flex the thoracic and lumbar spine at an angle of 40-45°; the shanks are externally rotated at 45° with lower limb abduction of 5-10° [205, 208].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comment: In this patient position, the antagonist muscles balance each other out to a greater extent than in any other positioning. Furthermore, relaxation of the iliopsoas muscle significantly reduces pressure on the fragments of the anterior pelvic ring, decreasing pain impulses from the fracture sites. Consequently, the risk of secondary displacement of bone fragments is substantially reduced, and pain intensity decreases. In forced conservative treatment of vertically unstable injuries or during the preoperative period, skeletal traction on the side of the posterior disruption is mandatory.

3.2.1. Use of a pelvic binder in the management of pelvic injuries in hemodynamically unstable patients

· It is recommended that patients with signs of pelvic ring injuries, in accordance with the ATLS protocol, have a pelvic binder applied at the scene prior to mechanical fixation of the pelvic bones [26].

CGR CLEL 5Clinical Guideline Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: The pelvic binder can be "improvised" (e.g., a sheet) or a standard specialized device. To apply a pelvic binder correctly, it should be wrapped around the greater trochanters and the pubic symphysis; tightening it secures the pelvic fracture and brings the lower extremities together, which helps reduce the internal volume of the pelvis. Standard pelvic binders are more effective at stabilizing fragments and reducing pelvic hemorrhage than improvised ones. However, in resource-limited settings or when standard devices are unavailable, an improvised pelvic binder can be effective and safe [25].

A pelvic binder is contraindicated in lateral compression injuries and acetabular fractures.

It is recommended that patients with hemodynamic instability undergo non-invasive external pelvic compression (application of an immobilization bandage for bone fractures) as an early means of pelvic ring stabilization to reduce the volume of pelvic hemorrhage in the initial phase, while considering the earliest possible replacement of the non-invasive external compression system with an external pelvic fixation device (reusable external orthopedic fixation system) [2, 25, 26, 42, 45].

GGR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

Comment: Non-invasive external pelvic compression devices (pelvic binders) should be removed as soon as physiologically feasible and replaced with an external fixation device or definitive pelvic stabilization, if indicated. Pelvic binders should be positioned with caution in pregnant women and elderly patients. In patients with a pelvic binder in place, early transfer off the spine board significantly reduces the likelihood of pressure ulcers, whenever possible. If the binder is not removed in a timely manner and is applied with excessive force, complications may develop within 2–3 hours (skin necrosis and pressure ulcers, especially in the elderly). If indicated, the pelvic binder should be replaced by surgical stabilization of the pelvic ring (application of external fixation devices [reusable external orthopedic fixation system] after radiodiagnostics and initiation of intensive care). The pelvic binder should not be left in place overnight, even if definitive early surgical treatment is planned [25].

It is recommended to prefer the use of pelvic binders (if available) over wrapping with improvised materials in all patients at the prehospital stage for more effective arrest of pelvic hemorrhage [25].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended that all patients have non-invasive external pelvic compression devices (immobilization bandages for bone fractures) removed as soon as physiologically feasible and replaced with an external fixation device (application of external fixation devices) or definitive pelvic stabilization (osteosynthesis), if indicated and feasible [25].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

3.3 Surgical treatment

It is recommended that patients with pelvic ring fractures and major fragment displacement undergo reduction using skeletal traction or external fixation devices (application of external fixation devices) to stabilize the pelvic ring [196].

LoR CLEL 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: If treatment of the patient at the medical institution is not feasible, transfer to a level I or II trauma center must be arranged [209].

It is recommended that patients with pelvic ring disruption undergo surgical treatment using plates and screws and/or an external fixation device (internal and/or external osteosynthesis) for definitive fragment fixation [205].

GCR BLOCE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

Comment: In rotationally and vertically unstable injuries, synthesis of the anterior and posterior segments of the pelvic ring must be performed. For acetabular floor fractures and central displacement, closed reduction with the application of fixation devices anchored to the pelvis and femur is most effective. This design subsequently allows for minimally invasive percutaneous osteosynthesis of both columns with cannulated screws. Skeletal traction is indicated in the preoperative period for acetabular fractures solely for immobilization, but requires double traction in the event of central displacement of fragments and the femoral head. If surgical treatment is impossible due to somatic indications or technical issues, the application of external fixation devices (reusable external orthopedic fixation system) with fixation points on the pelvis and femur with the best possible reduction is indicated. If treatment of the patient at the medical institution is not feasible, transfer to a level I or II trauma center must be arranged.

It is recommended in marginal acetabular fractures with subluxation or dislocation of the femoral head to first correct the displacement of the femur under anesthesia, and then apply a traction system [191, 205].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: In case of femoral head protrusion into the lesser pelvis, the displacement must be corrected emergently and in a single stage under adequate anesthesia, followed by the application of external fixation devices (reusable external orthopedic fixation system) with fixation points on the pelvis and femur. If modern surgical care and the performance of these interventions are not available for such patients, the patient must be transferred to a level 1 trauma center or a medical institution with the infrastructure and trained personnel to perform such interventions.

3.3.1 Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) in Pelvic Ring Injuries in Patients with Hemodynamic Instability

Endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is considered as an alternative to open surgery in patients with hemodynamic instability [48–51]. REBOA and other endovascular and hybrid trauma management (EVTM) techniques are increasingly used in the general structure of care for various injuries, including pelvic hemorrhage, and are now included in care algorithms in major trauma centers [6, 25, 48–50, 52–58].

It is recommended that patients undergo endovascular vessel (aortic) occlusion using a balloon (REBOA) to stop hemorrhage [61–64].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: REBOA is regarded as a "bridge to surgery" and, in pelvic hemorrhage, as an alternative to resuscitative thoracotomy followed by open surgery or angioembolization (or both methods) for definitive hemostasis. This involves the use of all the aforementioned methods in the early treatment of patients and may require the presence of a cardiovascular surgeon on the polytrauma care team [52, 69, 70]. REBOA can be performed in Zone I (above the celiac trunk or in the descending thoracic aorta) or Zone III (infrarenal), but not in Zone II (pararenal), where balloon inflation is not recommended due to the risk of visceral organ ischemia. When performing manipulations in a hemodynamically unstable patient in the shock trauma room, percutaneous or open surgical access to the femoral artery or ultrasound-guided access may be time-consuming. In severe pelvic injuries, vascular injuries are possible, with a higher risk in elderly patients with calcified vessels. Today, most trauma specialists use REBOA only in critically ill patients with multiple sources of hemorrhage as a "bridge" before definitive damage control surgery [25].

3.3.2 Preperitoneal Pelvic Packing in Pelvic Injuries in Patients with Hemodynamic Instability

The main source of acute retroperitoneal hemorrhage in patients with hemodynamic instability and pelvic ring injuries is venous bleeding (in 80–90% of cases) from the presacral and paravesical venous plexuses, as well as from bleeding cancellous bone surfaces in the area of sacral, iliac fractures, and the presacral plexuses of the sacroiliac joint [25, 77]. Arteries are the source of intrapelvic hemorrhage in only 10–20% of cases. Arterial bleeding can cause hemodynamic instability despite mechanical pelvic stabilization [25, 78] and is accompanied by venous bleeding in almost 100% of cases [25, 46, 79].

It is recommended that patients with hemodynamic instability in the presence of predominantly venous retroperitoneal hemorrhage undergo preperitoneal pelvic packing for emergency surgical hemostasis [4, 25, 82].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: Preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP) is considered a rapid and easily performable intervention [4, 25, 79] that can be carried out both in the operating room and in the trauma bay [4, 25]. However, it should be kept in mind that PPP is effective only when the pelvic ring is stabilized.

It is recommended that patients with hemodynamic instability undergo definitive stabilization of the pelvic ring (using an external fixation device and/or internal osteosynthesis methods) within 48–72 hours after PPP in order to further reduce blood loss, the need for blood component and product transfusions, and mortality in such injuries [5, 25, 87].

GCP CLE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: In unstable pelvic ring injuries in patients with hemodynamic instability, PPP should be performed after external fixation of the pelvic ring if hemodynamic instability persists. In extremely critical conditions, pelvic ring stabilization can be rapidly achieved by applying a pelvic binder. The additional placement of rolled surgical towels beneath the binder allows for compression in case of sacroiliac joint disruption. Some patients with ongoing hemorrhage and/or persistent indications for blood transfusion after pelvic packing are recommended to undergo subsequent (secondary) angioembolization [25].

3.3.3 External pelvic fixation for pelvic ring injuries in patients with hemodynamic instability

The biomechanics of pelvic injuries and the underlying mechanism determine the indications for external fixation [25, 58, 95]. The choice and assembly of the device depend on the type of injury, available equipment, operating room facilities, and the surgeon's experience. It must be remembered that in vertical instability, anterior pelvic ring fixators do not maintain the reduction of the posterior segments, which requires either a combination of external fixation devices (reusable external orthopedic fixation system) or the insertion of cannulated screws.

It is recommended to temporarily stabilize pelvic ring injuries in patients with hemodynamic instability to prevent further hemorrhage and to enhance the efficacy of other hemostatic methods, including angiography and pelvic packing [25, 28, 46, 58, 97].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: Indications for emergency stabilization of the pelvic ring with external fixation devices are:

  • vertically unstable pelvic ring injuries,

  • rotationally unstable injuries with an increased pelvic volume,

  • bilateral injuries.

When determining the indications and technique for external pelvic fixation, one should proceed from the Young-Burgess classification of pelvic injuries. Unstable pelvic traumas resulting from anteroposterior compression (APC-II/APC-III) and lateral compression (LC-II/LC-III) must be fixed with anterior devices by inserting Schanz pins into the iliac wings or supra-acetabularly. Although pin insertion into the iliac wings is simpler and allows for rapid frame installation in a damage control setting, the pull-out resistance of Schanz pins inserted in this zone is extremely low, leading to a high risk of device instability and loss of reduction [25, 96].

3.3.4 Definitive surgical fixation of pelvic ring injuries

Anatomical reduction and stable fixation of rotationally and vertically unstable pelvic injuries are prerequisites for early functional rehabilitation. There is a general consensus that pelvic fractures and dislocations with posterior ring instability require internal fixation [25, 95, 121]. In vertically unstable and bilateral fractures, fixation of the anterior segments alone is insufficient and requires osteosynthesis of the posterior segments. The decision regarding open or closed reduction, as well as the choice of implant, depends on the available fixators, equipment, and the operating surgeon's experience. Plate osteosynthesis, intramedullary osteosynthesis, the use of an external fixation device as a definitive treatment method, and transpedicular constructs are possible, especially when spinal canal decompression and spino-pelvic dissociation reduction are necessary.

GCP CLE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

It is recommended that in all patients with pelvic ring injuries, provided appropriate implantable medical devices (metal fixators, non-absorbable sterile internal orthopedic fixation system using plates/screws***) and technical capabilities are available and there are no contraindications, internal surgical fracture fixation methods be used to reduce chronic pain and complications associated with prolonged immobilization [25, 125–133].

GCP CLE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comment: Methods of internal surgical fixation include:

  • open reduction and internal fixation of the pubic symphysis with plates,

  • minimally invasive percutaneous screw fixation using iliosacral screws to stabilize unstable sacral fractures and sacroiliac joint disruptions,

  • minimally invasive percutaneous screw fixation of other pelvic ring fractures in the absence of interfragmentary interposition,

  • osteosynthesis of the iliac wing with plates and screws,

  • spino-pelvic fixation (referred to as "triangular osteosynthesis" when combined with iliosacral screws)

  • posterior plating to stabilize posterior ring injuries, including vertically unstable sacral fractures.

It is recommended in cases of lateral compression (LC) to perform osteosynthesis of the anterior pelvic ring for a period of 6 weeks, which prevents rotational instability of the anterior ring, with the aim of early functional rehabilitation and reduced disability duration [25, 58, 134].

GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4)

Comments. In patients with lateral compression, osteosynthesis of the anterior pelvic segments using external (reusable external orthopedic fixation system) or implantable devices (non-absorbable sterile internal orthopedic fixation system using plates/screws***) is indicated in the presence of concomitant visceral injury, laparotomy, severe fragment displacement, or the need for early mobilization to treat other skeletal injuries within the polytrauma framework.

It is recommended that children and adolescents with avulsion fractures of the pelvis accompanied by a displacement of more than 5–8 mm undergo surgical treatment in the form of open reduction and internal fixation [211].

GPR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence 1)

Comments. Regarding unstable type B and C pelvic ring injuries in adolescents aged 12 years and older, no studies have been conducted to prove the efficacy of alternative therapeutic and surgical tactics used for adult patients. Surgical care for children with unstable pelvic injuries should be provided in multidisciplinary pediatric facilities using modern principles of reduction and osteosynthesis [212, 213].

3.3.5 Optimal timing for definitive internal pelvic fixation

The selection of optimal timing for definitive internal fixation of unstable pelvic trauma remains a subject of debate [25, 138–145].

It is not recommended for patients with signs of severe traumatic shock to undergo early definitive pelvic fixation due to the risk of mortality resulting from ongoing hemorrhage and the development of the "lethal triad" of coagulopathy, acidosis, and hypothermia [22, 25, 146].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comment: It has been established that performing brief early primary pelvic fixation reduces the incidence of multiple organ failure and lowers mortality [25, 148]. Furthermore, it was shown that the rate of postoperative complications when performing definitive osteosynthesis between the 2nd and 4th days after trauma is significantly higher than when surgery is delayed until the 6th to 8th days after trauma [25, 149].

3.3.6 Staged surgical management in severe traumatic brain injury

Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is frequently encountered in polytrauma patients presenting with concomitant pelvic trauma. Currently, there are no universally accepted treatment protocols for severe combined head and pelvic injuries. One of the most critical aspects is the combination of pelvic fractures with hemorrhage and subsequent coagulopathy, which exacerbates the course of TBI through secondary bleeding and the subsequent progression of hemorrhagic contusion foci in a vicious circle [25].

It is recommended for patients with pelvic trauma and TBI to use external fixation (as well as internal osteosynthesis when necessary) as part of a staged surgical treatment strategy adhering to Damage Control principles [25, 150].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comments: Careful monitoring of the course of traumatic brain injury with potential early repeat CT scanning in cerebral perfusion mode may yield favorable outcomes [25, 150]. As a rule, neurosurgeons are concerned about potential additional brain damage resulting from blood pressure fluctuations observed during osteosynthesis surgery [25, 150]. Overall, this leads to doubts regarding the tactics and additional delay required to stabilize the patient and prepare them for surgery [25, 150].

3.4. Postoperative pain management

  • To ensure adequate pain relief in patients with pelvic bone fractures, it is recommended to use multimodal analgesia, which may include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), paracetamol**, gabapentinoids, and immediate-release opioids, taking into account age restrictions in the instructions for medical use; if its administration is not feasible, monomodal analgesia should be used [211–213].

GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2)

Comments: It is necessary to ensure adequate analgesia for the patient with a fracture prior to any manipulations and throughout the entire period of fracture treatment, the duration of which varies significantly depending on the chosen management strategy. When performing analgesia in a hospital setting, it is necessary to take into account prescriptions made at the emergency medical care stage. In the acute period of trauma, for the purpose of analgesia, it is necessary to ensure proper immobilization of fragments using a vacuum splint, a vacuum mattress, or an external fixation device.

Among pharmacological strategies, the current consensus is the use of multimodal analgesia (MMA), which involves the use of several analgesic drugs (opioid and non-opioid) with different mechanisms of action, as well as non-pharmacological interventions aimed at targeting peripheral and/or central parts of the nervous system [214]. This combination allows for more effective pain relief by enhancing the effects of various drugs, which in most cases leads to a reduction in the frequency of prescriptions and/or doses of opioid analgesics. Thus, MMA improves the risk profile of each drug while providing synergistic pain control using different drug classes. Postoperative MMA may include psychotherapy, physical therapy, NSAIDs, paracetamol**, gabapentinoids, regional anesthesia (single injection or placement of peripheral nerve catheters), local injections, and opioids [212, 215].

In modern scientific literature, authors emphasize the use of the lowest effective doses of opioids for the shortest possible period, avoiding extended-release opioids. As an adjuvant during MMA, a single perioperative administration of #dexamethasone** can be used, which provides a significant reduction in pain syndrome [211].

It must be borne in mind that the duration of parenteral administration of most NSAIDs (ketorolac**, ketoprofen**, diclofenac**) is limited to two days, which requires timely switching of the patient to oral administration, changing the drug, or coordinating further use with the medical commission. The specific choice of local anesthesia method and medicinal products is made by the attending physician individually in accordance with the patient's characteristics, local protocols, and the equipment of the medical organization.

When prescribing analgesic therapy for children, a single dose should be chosen taking into account the child's weight and age. Preference should be given to analgesics with oral or rectal administration routes, avoiding intramuscular injections.

It is recommended to perform local block or regional anesthesia as part of the postoperative multimodal regimen [212, 216].

Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)

Recommended analgesic medications are listed in Appendices A3.1-A3.3

3.5. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis

  • In the surgical treatment of patients with pelvic bone fractures, it is recommended to perform surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) for surgical site infections by a single preoperative administration of an antibacterial drug to reduce the risk of infectious complications [218].

GGR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments. In accordance with international clinical guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infections [217, 219], the objective of SAP is to establish bactericidal concentrations of the antibacterial drug in tissues exposed to microbial contamination during surgery to prevent surgical site infections. The necessity of SAP is determined by the surgical wound class of the upcoming procedure: SAP is not required for "clean" surgical wounds not associated with the placement of orthopedic and metal implants. SAP should be performed for clean-contaminated and contaminated surgical wounds, as well as for "clean" surgical wounds involving the placement of orthopedic and metal implants. For infected ("dirty") wounds, SAP is not indicated; instead, antibiotic therapy is administered.

  • In patients with pelvic bone fractures, it is recommended to use first- and second-generation (I and II) cephalosporins (cefazolin**, cefuroxime**) as the primary drugs for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis during surgical interventions in traumatology and orthopedics, and glycopeptide antibiotics (vancomycin**) or lincosamides (#clindamycin**) as alternatives in case of beta-lactam antibiotic intolerance [217].

GGR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments. For patients with an unburdened allergic history and without significant risk factors for methicillin-resistant staphylococci carriage, first- and second-generation (I and II) cephalosporins (cefazolin**, cefuroxime**) are used for SAP prevention and are administered intravenously 30 to 60 minutes before skin incision. In case of beta-lactam intolerance, a combination of vancomycin** with one of the fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin**, #levofloxacin**) administered over at least 60 minutes starting the IV infusion 2 hours before incision, or #clindamycin** should be prescribed. When significant risk factors for methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MRS) carriage are present, the SAP regimen must include an antibiotic with anti-MRS activity (vancomycin**). In most cases, a single preoperative dose of the antibiotic is sufficient for effective prophylaxis. For prolonged procedures or massive blood loss, an additional intraoperative dose of the antibiotic should be administered (the estimated time for intraoperative administration is two half-lives after the preoperative dose). Administering an antibiotic after wound closure in the operating room is inappropriate even if drains are in place.

Single doses of main antibacterial drugs for SAP in adult traumatology and orthopedic surgeries: cefazolin** 2 g (for patient weight ≥120 kg — 3 g), cefuroxime** 1.5 g, #clindamycin** 900 mg, vancomycin** 15 mg/kg as a slow IV infusion, ciprofloxacin** 400 mg, #levofloxacin** 500 mg [216].

Single doses for children should be calculated based on actual weight: cefazolin** 30 mg/kg, cefuroxime** 50 mg/kg, #clindamycin** 10 mg/kg, vancomycin** 15 mg/kg; the use of fluoroquinolones during the period of musculoskeletal system development is contraindicated due to the risk of arthropathy [216, 255, 256].

It is recommended to administer antibacterial therapy for no more than 72 hours after wound closure in patients with pelvic bone fractures [224].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 1)

Comments. In cases of open fractures, prophylactic antibiotic administration is effective in preventing early infection, and the drug should be administered as soon as possible after trauma. Cefazolin** is the antibiotic of choice, but for patients with open high-energy fractures with displacement and segmental loss, major vessel injury, and heavily contaminated wounds, expanding the spectrum of prescribed antibiotics to cover gram-negative pathogens is advisable. In such cases, adding #gentamicin** (at a dose of 6 mg/kg once daily) to cefazolin** may be considered for adult patients [220, 221]. An alternative to this combination may be #ampicillin+sulbactam** (at a dose of 3.0 g every 8 hours for 3 days) [221], the latter being particularly relevant in case of the risk of clostridial infection. According to the majority of researchers, in Gustilo-Anderson type III open fractures, antibiotics should not be continued for more than 72 hours after soft tissue wound closure.

  • In the surgical treatment of patients with pelvic bone fractures, it is recommended to perform surgical site infection antibiotic prophylaxis for a duration of no more than 24 hours [223].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 1)

Comments: In accordance with the regulations currently in force in the Russian Federation (SanPiN 3.3686-21) and clinical guidelines [223], to achieve an effective concentration of the antibacterial drug in tissues and blood serum at the time of skin incision, antibiotics for the prevention of surgical site infection should be administered intravenously within 30 to 60 minutes before the skin incision, with vancomycin** administered within 2 hours before the incision. The maximum duration of prophylactic antibiotic administration should not exceed 24 hours after the end of surgery. In most cases, a single dose of an antibiotic is sufficient for effective prophylaxis. Additional doses should be administered during prolonged surgeries when the half-life of the administered antibiotic has elapsed since the preoperative dose, creating a risk of the antibiotic concentration dropping below the bactericidal level and increasing the risk of surgical site infection (SSI).

3.6. Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism

  • For patients undergoing conservative treatment for pelvic fractures, it is recommended to carry out the prevention of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) using pharmacological and (or) mechanical methods of prevention [225,226].

GCR ALeE 3Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence 3).

Comment: In the conservative treatment of pelvic fractures, preference should be given to pharmacological (medical) methods of VTE prevention [225,226]. The use of low molecular weight heparins (LMWH) from the heparin group (ATX group code B01AB) is preferred [225]. Recommended doses, frequency, and route of administration are presented in Appendix A3.4.

Mechanical methods of prevention include elastic and (or) intermittent sequential pneumatic compression of the lower extremities. Other non-drug prevention methods include early mobilization and activation of the patient, and therapeutic exercises.

  • For patients undergoing conservative treatment for pelvic fractures, it is recommended to prescribe prophylaxis early using low molecular weight heparins from the heparin group (ATX group code B01AB) (within the first 24 hours after injury) [226].

GGR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

Comment: Recommended intervals between the prophylactic use of anticoagulants and neuroaxial interventions are given in Appendix A3.5.

  • For patients undergoing conservative treatment for pelvic fractures, it is recommended to provide prolonged antithrombotic prophylaxis (more than 1 month) [227, 228].

GGR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

  • For patients undergoing surgical treatment for pelvic fractures, it is recommended to carry out VTE prevention as early as possible (within the first 24 hours after injury) using low molecular weight heparins from the heparin group (ATX group code B01AB) once hemostasis is achieved and there is a low risk of bleeding [229,230].

GGR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

  • For patients undergoing surgical treatment for pelvic fractures, it is recommended to carry out pharmacological VTE prevention for at least 4 weeks. It is recommended to consider extending pharmacological prophylaxis for the entire period of maintained immobilization (more than 4 weeks) [227,228,231,232].

GGR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

Issues of VTE prevention in trauma and orthopedic patients are discussed in detail in the 2022 methodological recommendations [233] and the 2023 recommendations of Russian experts [234].

3.7. Diet therapy

No specific dietary therapy has been developed.

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

Rehabilitation of patients with pelvic trauma, regardless of the treatment method, begins after the cessation of bleeding and stabilization of hemodynamics, and the restoration of the mechanical integrity and stability of the pelvic ring [199, 202, 237, 252].

Individual publications have demonstrated the effectiveness of rehabilitation in the postoperative period, but there are no unified rehabilitation protocols for surgical treatments of pelvic ring fractures [236-238, 243]. The main issue is the timing of verticalization and permissible axial load on the extremities after surgical treatment. This issue is decided individually in conjunction with the operating physician and depends on the stability of the fracture and pelvic ring fixation, but requires further study and scientific justification [236-237, 241, 246].

It is recommended for conservative treatment of pelvic ring fractures to undergo inpatient rehabilitation according to the immobilization period program to prevent hypostatic complications (immobilization syndrome), improve blood circulation in the extremities, prevent muscle hypotrophy, and train in locomotion with auxiliary support devices [238, 240, 243, 248].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comments: in the conservative treatment of pelvic ring fractures, immobilization is carried out with the patient in the supine position on a functional bed or with a large bolster under the knee joints, flexing the legs at the knee (125⁰-135⁰) and hip joints (35⁰-40⁰) with hip abduction of about 10⁰ [199, 202].

A physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) physician/exercise therapy specialist draws up an individual rehabilitation program prescribing exercise therapy means: breathing exercises, isometric exercises for the thigh muscles, gluteal muscles, lumbar spine muscles, dynamic exercises for the knee and ankle joints, and dynamic exercises for the upper extremities. Therapeutic gymnastics is an important component of the conservative treatment of patients with pelvic ring injuries accompanied by multiorgan disorders associated with restricted motor activity and prolonged horizontal positioning of patients. This condition can lead to musculoskeletal, respiratory, endocrine-metabolic, and cardiovascular disorders [248].

From the first days, to reduce pain, local cold pack cryotherapy, electrotherapy, and magnetotherapy are prescribed [250, 252].

The duration of bed rest depends on the number and location of pelvic ring fractures and is determined by the attending physician for up to 3–6 weeks.

Two weeks after a repeat consultation with the PRM physician/exercise therapy specialist, exercises with resistance and additional movement weighting are prescribed, along with manual massage of the lower extremities, which is necessary to prepare the patient for verticalization. After adaptation to the upright position, patients are taught to walk with crutches or a walker [245, 252].

It is recommended for conservative treatment of pelvic ring fractures to undergo outpatient (home) rehabilitation according to the recovery period program to strengthen the muscles of the pelvic floor and lower extremities, and to restore weight-bearing capacity and proper gait [242, 245, 252].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comments: Upon discharge from the hospital, the PRM physician/exercise therapy specialist gives recommendations to the patient on continuing rehabilitation at home, introduces the exercise program necessary to strengthen the muscles of the pelvic floor, lumbar spine, and lower extremities, and determines the approximate timing for permissible axial loading on the extremities and full-weight-bearing walking.

The duration of walking with auxiliary support devices is determined individually depending on the type of pelvic ring injury and the pain syndrome. The criterion for discontinuing additional load-bearing devices is the absence of pain in the fracture area during walking [244, 246].

It is recommended for internal surgical fixation of pelvic ring fractures (plates, screws, fixators) to undergo inpatient rehabilitation according to the early postoperative period program to prevent postoperative complications, improve blood circulation in the extremities, ensure early patient activation, and train in locomotion with auxiliary support devices [239, 241, 247, 250, 251].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comments: from the 1st–2nd day after surgery, the PRM physician/exercise therapy specialist draws up an individual rehabilitation program prescribing exercise therapy and physical therapy: static, dynamic, breathing, and general conditioning exercises for all muscle groups, ideomotor exercises, active movements of the toes and knee joints, and isometric tensions of the lower leg and thigh muscles. From the 3rd–4th day after surgery (if the patient's general condition allows), isometric tensions of the pelvic girdle, thigh, and lower leg muscles [239, 241, 248, 250]. There are isolated publications on the use of bedside passive mechanotherapy using the MOTOmed letto2 device and electrical stimulation [250].

From the first days after surgery, to reduce pain, cold pack cryotherapy and TENS are prescribed [239, 241].

Two weeks after a repeat consultation with the PRM physician/exercise therapy specialist, provided the patient's general condition is satisfactory, resistance and weight exercises are prescribed to strengthen the lower extremity muscle groups, which are recommended to be performed at home after discharge from the hospital [239, 241, 251].

Verticalization of the patient is carried out on days 2–4 after surgery [239-241]. The issue of axial loading and the duration of walking with auxiliary support devices is decided individually in conjunction with the operating surgeon [236, 237, 239].

Recommended for internal surgical fixation of pelvic ring fractures (plates, screws, fixators) is outpatient (home) rehabilitation according to the late postoperative period program aimed at improving blood circulation in the limbs, maintaining muscle tone and strength, training locomotion with auxiliary support devices, restoring limb weight-bearing capacity, and ensuring a correct gait [239, 241, 242, 244, 247].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comments: surgical fixation of the fracture allows early verticalization of the patient and walking with auxiliary support devices, and therefore discharge from the hospital. The outpatient (home) rehabilitation program is drawn up by a PRM/exercise therapy physician and includes physical exercises with increasing load on the lower limb girdle muscles: dynamic exercises with resistance and weights, static exercises, and gait training with partial weight bearing on the limbs. The duration of the rehabilitation period, or the permissibility of full weight-bearing on the legs, is determined by the time required for fracture healing, ranging from 3 to 6 months [242, 242, 244, 249, 251].

Recommended for fixation of pelvic ring fractures with external fixation devices is inpatient rehabilitation according to the early postoperative period program aimed at improving blood circulation in the limbs, maintaining joint mobility and lower limb muscle strength, early mobilization, and training locomotion with auxiliary support devices [236, 237, 243, 251, 252].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: from the first day after fixation of fractures with external fixation devices, the PRM/exercise therapy physician draws up a rehabilitation program prescribing therapeutic gymnastics: general tonic exercises, breathing exercises, assisted and active dynamic exercises for the distal leg joints, isometric exercises for the thigh, pelvic floor, and lumbar spine muscles, and ideomotor exercises for the hip joints.

From the second day after surgery, the patient is verticalized and trained in locomotion using crutches or a walker [247, 251, 252].

Recommended for fixation of pelvic ring fractures with external fixation devices is home rehabilitation according to the late postoperative period program aimed at improving blood circulation in the limbs, maintaining joint mobility, strengthening the lower limb girdle muscles, and training gait with partial weight bearing and auxiliary support devices [238, 239, 243, 247].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comments: upon discharge from the hospital, the PRM/exercise therapy physician draws up a rehabilitation program prescribing therapeutic gymnastics: free, weighted, and resisted dynamic exercises for the lower limbs, gluteal muscles, and pelvic floor muscles, which must be performed at home with a gradual increase in load and procedure duration. The program is carried out until the external fixation device is removed.

Recommended for pelvic ring fractures after the removal of external fixation devices is outpatient (day hospital) rehabilitation according to the recovery period program aimed at restoring hip joint mobility, strengthening the lower limb girdle muscles, and restoring limb weight-bearing capacity and gait stereotypy [238, 239, 243, 247].

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comments: after removal of the external fixation device, the PRM/exercise therapy physician determines the degree of functional impairment and, depending on the severity of the motor deficit, draws up an outpatient rehabilitation program. Physical exercises, passive and active mechanotherapy, balance and gait training, muscle electrical stimulation, ultrasound therapy, manual/underwater massage, physical exercises in water, and therapeutic swimming are prescribed [242, 249, 250].

Recommended: for mild pelvic injuries, prescribe bed rest on a hard surface for 3–4 weeks [202].

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: Medical physical therapy. From the first day, passive movements in the hip joint are performed with support for the thigh and lower leg within the limits determined by pain intensity. They slowly transition to active movements.

Straight leg raise is strictly contraindicated. Mechanotherapy can be used. When traction is used, physical therapy for bone fractures is started only after the removal of traction. Getting out of bed and weight-bearing. Single pelvic ring fractures. With sufficient stability — pool gymnastics from the 10th day. From the 3rd–4th week, walking on crutches or with a walker is initiated. Load is increased after 6 weeks. With instability in the sacroiliac joint, patients are mobilized at the 9th week. Acetabular fractures. With stable osteosynthesis, patients are mobilized on the 2nd–3rd day (without axial load on the damaged joint). Graduated weight-bearing is allowed at the 13th week. Load is increased after 6 weeks under X-ray control. Full weight-bearing is allowed after 4–6 months. In case of femoral head injury, the question of weight-bearing is decided individually.

In pelvic fractures, the lower limb on the affected side is placed on a damping device for skeletal traction (Böhler splint) without applying actual skeletal traction. In sacral and coccygeal fractures, the patient is placed in the "frog" position (according to N.M. Volkovich) for 2–4 weeks.

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

Prevention of pelvic injuries does not differ from that of other injuries: compliance with safety rules by the patient and implementation of measures to create a trauma-safe environment by the state, in particular, the use of engineering and technical support for high-risk areas with active and passive citizen protection measures (road lighting, ice control, maintenance of vehicles in good working order, equipping them with passive safety features), and the creation of a trauma-safe environment in enterprises.

Recommended: trauma and orthopedic surgeon should conduct dynamic follow-up of patients with pelvic injuries at 3, 6, and 12 months from the date of hospital discharge to monitor recovery from injuries [209].

RG CLE 5Recommendation Grade C (Level of Evidence 5).

6. Organization of Medical Care

Indications for hospital admission.

The presence of pelvic ring injuries or suspicion of such injuries based on the mechanism of injury is an indication for emergency admission to a multidisciplinary hospital equipped with a shock trauma room or ICU (preferably a level II or I trauma center).

If the medical organization lacks a specialized shock trauma room or ICU, as well as the capability to provide specialized care to patients with pelvic ring and acetabular injuries, anti-shock measures must be performed in the ICU, pelvic ring stabilization should be carried out using a binder or, if possible, external fixation devices, followed by evacuation of the patient to a level I or II trauma center where the infrastructure and trained personnel are available to provide such care.

Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:

  1. Outpatient treatment of mild pelvic injuries not requiring surgical treatment;

  2. After definitive stabilization of the pelvic ring and restoration of the patient's ability to self-care in the absence of hemodynamic disturbances and a smooth postoperative course.

7. Additional Information

Mortality, lethality, and treatment outcomes. Pelvic injuries, especially open ones, can lead to complications with significant functional impairments: urinary and fecal incontinence, impotence, dyspareunia, residual motor deficits, perineal and pelvic abscesses, chronic pain, and vascular complications such as thrombosis and embolism [1, 3, 25].

The majority (44.7%) of deaths due to pelvic trauma occur on the day of injury, and the main factors correlating with mortality are age, ISS injury severity score, pelvic ring instability, wound size and degree of contamination, rectal injury, colostomy creation, number of transfused blood components, AIS head injury severity, and base deficit in blood gas analysis upon admission [3, 5, 25].

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

№

Quality criteria

Score

performance

1

Initial examination (inspection, consultation) by a trauma and orthopedic surgeon or initial examination (inspection, consultation) by a surgeon or pediatric surgeon has been performed

Yes/no

2

Pelvic radiography and/or pelvic computed tomography has been performed (including computed tomography of the lesser pelvis in women and the pelvic organs in men for patients with hemodynamic instability and suspected intrapelvic hemorrhage)

Yes/no

3

In patients with hemodynamic instability and suspected intrapelvic hemorrhage, an examination (consultation) by a cardiovascular surgeon and/or an endovascular surgeon has been performed

Yes/no

4

Performance of a comprehensive ultrasound examination of internal organs (comprehensive ultrasound of the abdominal cavity and/or comprehensive ultrasound of the pelvic organs (transvaginal and transabdominal)) in patients with unstable hemodynamics

Yes/no

5

Performance of a general (clinical) blood count, general therapeutic biochemical blood test, and coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis test)

Yes/no

6

Performance of acid-base balance and blood gas analysis

Yes/no

7

Prescription of analgesics and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or local anesthetics and/or gabapentinoids and/or immediate-release opioids and/or drugs from the "Other analgesics and antipyretics" group (N02B) (depending on medical indications and in the absence of contraindications)

Yes/no

8

In patients with unstable hemodynamics at the inpatient stage, temporary stabilization of pelvic ring fractures was performed using external fixation osteosynthesis

Yes/no

9

Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic complications performed using antithrombotic drugs and/or mechanical prevention methods (depending on medical indications and in the absence of contraindications)

Yes/no

10

Definitive internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures was performed using plates and/or screws and/or other internal metal implants (depending on medical indications and in the absence of medical contraindications)

Yes/no

References

Show references
  1. Arvieux C, Thony F, Broux C, et al. Current management of severe pelvic and perineal trauma. J Visc Surg. 2012; 149: e227–38

  2. Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, Zielinski MD, et al. Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma practice management guidelines for hemorrhage in pelvic fracture–update and systematic review. J Trauma. 2011; 71: 1850–1868

  3. Grotz MR, Allami MK, Harwood P, et al. Open pelvic fractures: epidemiology, current concepts of management and outcome. Injury. 2005; 36: 1–13

  4. Magnone S, Coccolini F, Manfredi R, et al. Management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma: results of the first Italian consensus conference (cooperative guidelines of the Italian Society of Surgery, the Italian Association of Hospital Surgeons, the Multi-specialist Italian Society of Young Surgeons, the Italian Society of Emergency Surgery and Trauma, the Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care, the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the Italian Society of Emergency Medicine, the Italian Society of Medical Radiology -Section of Vascular and Interventional Radiology- and the World Society of Emergency Surgery). World J Emerg Surg. 2014; 9:18

  5. Perkins ZB, Maytham GD, Koers L, Bates P, Brohi K, Tai NR. Impact on outcome of a targeted performance improvement programme in haemodynamically unstable patients with a pelvic fracture. Bone Joint J. 2014; 96-B: 1090–1097

  6. Biffl WL, Smith WR, Moore EE, et al. Evolution of a multidisciplinary clinical pathway for the management of unstable patients with pelvic fractures. Ann Surg. 2001;233:843–50

  7. Goslings JC, Ponsen KJ, van Delden OM. Injuries to the pelvis and extremities. In: ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice: Decker Intellectual Properties. 2013

  8. Coccolini F, Montori G, Catena F, et al. Liver trauma: WSES position paper. World J Emerg Surg. 2015;10:39

  9. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine — Levels of Evidence (March 2009). 2009. (Accessed at http://www.cebm.net/ocebm-levels-of-evidence/)

  10. Costantini TW, Coimbra R, Holcomb JB, et al. Current management of hemorrhage from severe pelvic fractures: Results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80:717–23. discussion 23–5

  11. Pereira SJ, O’Brien DP, Luchette FA, et al. Dynamic helical computed tomography scan accurately detects hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fracture. Surgery. 2000; 128:678–85

  12. Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW, et al. Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma. 1990; 30:848–56

  13. Huittinen VM, Slatis P. Postmortem angiography and dissection of the hypogastric artery in pelvic fractures. Surgery. 1973; 73:454–62

  14. Luckhoff C, Mitra B, Cameron PA, Fitzgerald M, Royce P. The diagnosis of acute urethral trauma. Injury. 2011; 42:913–6

  15. Blackmore CC, Cummings P, Jurkovich GJ, Linnau KF, Hoffer EK, Rivara FP. Predicting major hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fracture. J Trauma. 2006; 61:346–52

  16. Balogh Z, Caldwell E, Heetveld M, et al. Institutional practice guidelines on management of pelvic fracture-related hemodynamic instability: do they make a difference? J Trauma. 2005; 58: 778–82

  17. Da Luz LT, Nascimento B, Shankarakutty AK, et al. Effect of thromboelastography (TEG(R)) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM(R)) on diagnosis of coagulopathy, transfusion guidance and mortality in trauma: descriptive systematic review. Crit Care. 2014; 18:518

  18. Duane TM, Tan BB, Golay D, Cole Jr FJ, Weireter Jr LJ, Britt LD. Blunt trauma and the role of routine pelvic radiographs: a prospective analysis. J Trauma. 2002;53:463–8

  19. Gonzalez E, Moore EE, Moore HB, et al. Goal-directed Hemostatic Resuscitation of  Trauma-induced Coagulopathy: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing a Viscoelastic Assay to Conventional Coagulation Assays. Ann Surg. 2016;263:1051–9

  20. Kashuk JL, Moore EE, Sawyer M, et al. Postinjury coagulopathy management: goal directed resuscitation via POC thrombelastography. Ann Surg. 2010; 251:604–14

  21. Rossaint R, Cerny V, Coats TJ, et al. Key issues in advanced bleeding care in trauma. Shock. 2006;26:322–31

  22. Stahel PF, Moore EE, Schreier SL, et al. Transfusion strategies in postinjury coagulopathy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:289–98

  23. Paydar S, Ghaffarpasand F, Foroughi M. et al. Role of routine pelvic radiography in initial evaluation of stable, high-energy, blunt trauma patients. Emerg Med J. 2013;30:724–7

  24. Mutschler M, Nienaber U, Brockamp T, et al. Renaissance of base deficit for the initial assessment of trauma patients: a base deficit-based classification for hypovolemic shock developed on data from 16,305 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU(R). Crit Care. 2013;17:R42

  25. Coccolini F, Stahel PF, Montori G. et al. Pelvic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2017; 12: 5. / Adapted Russian translation: Reva V.A. Travma taza: klassifikatsiya i klinicheskie rekomendatsii Vsemirnogo obshchestva neotlozhnoy khirurgii WSES [Elektronnyy resurs] // Politravma. 2018. №1. URI: https://poly-trauma.ru/index.php/pt/article/view/72/202.

  26. Committee of trauma of ACS. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Student manual 9th ed. ACS. Chicago. 2012

  27. Salim A, Teixeira PG, DuBose J. et al. Predictors of positive angiography in pelvic fractures: a prospective study. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 207: 656–62

  28. Marzi I, Lustenberger T. Management of bleeding pelvic fractures. Scand J Surg. 2014; 103: 104–11

  29. Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, et al. Management of bleeding following major trauma: an updated European guideline. Crit Care. 2010;14:R52

  30. Shlykov I.L. Sistema diagnostiki i kompleksnogo lecheniya bol'nykh s perelomami kostey taza i vertlyuzhnoy vpadiny : dis. … d-ra med. nauk: 14.01.15. – Saratov, 2010. – 422 p.

  31. Stengel D, Leisterer J, Ferrada P. et al. Point-of-care ultrasonography for diagnosing thoracoabdominal injuries in patients with blunt trauma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12(12):CD012669..

  32. Gonzalez RP, Fried PQ, Bukhalo M. The utility of clinical examination in screening for pelvic fractures in blunt trauma. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 194: 121–5

  33. Yugueros P, Sarmiento JM, Garcia AF, Ferrada R. Unnecessary use of pelvic x-ray in blunt trauma. J Trauma. 1995; 39: 722–5

  34. Guillamondegui OD, Pryor JP, Gracias VH, et al. Pelvic radiography in blunt trauma resuscitation: a diminishing role. J Trauma. 2002; 53: 1043–7

  35. Hallinan JT, Tan CH, Pua U. Emergency computed tomography for acute pelvic trauma: where is the bleeder? Clin Radiol. 2014;69:529–37

  36. Chen B, Zhang Y, Xiao S. et al. Personalized image-based templates for iliosacral screw insertions: a pilot study. Int J Med Robot. 2012;8:476–82

  37. Fleiter N, Reimertz C, Lustenberger T, et al. Importance of the correct placement of the pelvic binder for stabilisation of haemodynamically compromised patients. Z Orthop Unfall. 2012;150:627–9

  38. Bottlang M, Krieg JC, Mohr M, et al. Emergent management of pelvic ring fractures with use of circumferential compression. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A Suppl 2:43–7

  39. DeAngelis NA, Wixted JJ, Drew J, et al. Use of the trauma pelvic orthotic device (T-POD) for provisional stabilisation of anterior-posterior compression type pelvic fractures: a cadaveric study. Injury. 2008; 39: 903–6

  40. Hedrick-Thompson JK. A review of pressure reduction device studies. J Vasc Nurs. 1992; 10:3–5

  41. Spanjersberg WR, Knops SP, Schep NW, et al. Effectiveness and complications of pelvic circumferential compression devices in patients with unstable pelvic fractures: a systematic review of literature. Injury. 2009;40:1031–5

  42. Croce MA, Magnotti LJ, Savage SA, et al. Emergent pelvic fixation in patients with exsanguinating pelvic fractures. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:935–9.

  43. Krieg JC, Mohr M, Ellis TJ, et al. Emergent stabilization of pelvic ring injuries by controlled circumferential compression: a clinical trial. J Trauma. 2005;59:659–64

  44. Tinubu J, Scalea TM. Management of fractures in a geriatric surgical patient. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95:115–28

  45. Bakhshayesh P, Boutefnouchet T, Totterman A. Effectiveness of non invasive external pelvic compression: a systematic review of the literature. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016; 24: 73

  46. Abrassart S, Stern R, Peter R. Unstable pelvic ring injury with hemodynamic instability: what seems the best procedure choice and sequence in the initial management? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99:175–82

  47. Amorosa LF, Amorosa JH, Wellman DS, et al. Management of pelvic injuries in pregnancy. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013;44:301–15. VIII

  48. Stannard A, Eliason JL, Rasmussen TE. Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) as an Adjunct for Hemorrhagic Shock. J Trauma. 2011;71:1869–72

  49. Morrison JJ, Galgon RE, Jansen JO, et al. A systematic review of the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in the management of hemorrhagic shock. The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. 2016;80:324–34

  50. Biffl WL, Fox CJ, Moore EE. The role of REBOA in the control of exsanguinating torso hemorrhage. J Trauma Acute Care. 2015;78:1054–8

  51. Delamare L, Crognier L, Conil JM, Rousseau H, Georges B, Ruiz S. Treatment of intra-abdominal haemorrhagic shock by Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA). Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine. 2015;34:53–5

  52. Hörer TM, Skoog P, Pirouzram A, Nilsson KF, Larzon T. A small case series of aortic balloon occlusion in trauma: lessons learned from its use in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms and a brief review. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42(5):585–92

  53. Ogura T, Lefor AT, Nakano M, et al. Nonoperative management of hemodynamically unstable abdominal trauma patients with angioembolization and resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta. J Trauma Acute Care. 2015;78:132–5

  54. DuBose JJ, Scalea TM, Brenner M, Skiada D, Inaba K, Cannon J, et al; AAST AORTA Study Group. The AAST prospective Aortic Occlusion for Resuscitation in Trauma and Acute Care Surgery (AORTA) registry: data on contemporary utilization and outcomes of aortic occlusion and resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA). J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(3):409-19

  55. Burlew CC, Moore EE, Moore FA, et al. Western Trauma Association Critical Decisions in Trauma: Resuscitative thoracotomy. J Trauma Acute Care. 2012; 73:1359–64

  56. Burlew CC, Moore EE, Smith WR, et al. Preperitoneal pelvic packing/external fixation with secondary angioembolization: optimal care for life-threatening hemorrhage from unstable pelvic fractures. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212:628–35. discussion 35–7

  57. Martinelli T., Thony F., Declety P. et al. Intra-Aortic Balloon Occlusion to Salvage Patients With Life-Threatening Hemorrhagic Shocks From Pelvic Fractures. J Trauma. 2010;68:942–8

  58. Stahel PF, Mauffrey C, Smith WR, et al. External fixation for acute pelvic ring injuries: decision making and technical options. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013; 75:882–7

  59. Brenner ML, Moore LJ, DuBose JJ, et al. A clinical series of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for hemorrhage control and resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care. 2013;75:506–11

  60. Norii T, Crandall C, Terasaka Y. Survival of severe blunt trauma patients treated with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta compared with propensity score-adjusted untreated patients. J Trauma Acute Care. 2015;78:721–8

  61. Mayer D, Aeschbacher S, Pfammatter T, et al. Complete Replacement of Open Repair for Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms by Endovascular Aneurysm Repair A Two-Center 14-Year Experience. Ann Surg. 2012;256:688–96

  62. Malina M, Holst J. Balloon control for ruptured AAAs: when and when not to use? J Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;55:161–7

  63. Malina M, Veith F, Ivancev K, Sonesson B. Balloon occlusion of the aorta during endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of endovascular therapy: an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. 2005;12:556–9

  64. Larzon T, Skoog P. One hundred percent of ruptured aortic abdominal aneurysms can be treated endovascularly if adjunct techniques are used such as chimneys, periscopes and embolization. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;55:169–78

  65. Morrison J, Ross J, Houston R, Watson D, Rasmussen T. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta reduces mortality in a lethal model of non-compressible torso hemorrhage. Brit J Surg. 2013;100:8

  66. Morrison JJ, Ross JD, Houston R, Watson DB, Sokol KK, Rasmussen TE. Use of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta in a Highly Lethal Model of Noncompressible Torso Hemorrhage. Shock. 2014;41:130–7

  67. Russo RM, Neff LP, Lamb CM, Cannon JW, Galante JM, Clement NF, Grayson JK, Williams TK. Partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in swine model of hemorrhagic shock. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(2): 359–68

  68. White JM, Cannon JW, Stannard A, Markov NP, Spencer JR, Rasmussen TE. Endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is superior to resuscitative thoracotomy with aortic clamping in a porcine model of hemorrhagic shock. Surgery. 2011;150:400–9

  69. Horer TM, Hebron D, Swaid F, et al. Aorta Balloon Occlusion in Trauma: Three Cases Demonstrating Multidisciplinary Approach Already on Patient’s Arrival to the Emergency Room. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2015.BRS

  70. EndoVascular hybrid Trauma and bleeding Management (EVTM) declaration. (Accessed at www.jevtm.com)

  71. Morrison JJ, Ross JD, Markov NP, Scott DJ, Spencer JR, Rasmussen TE. The inflammatory sequelae of aortic balloon occlusion in hemorrhagic shock. J Surg Res. 2014;191:423–31

  72. Horer TM, Skoog P, Nilsson KF, et al. Intraperitoneal metabolic consequences of supraceliac aortic balloon occlusion in an experimental animal study using microdialysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:1286–95

  73. Markov NP, Percival TJ, Morrison JJ, et al. Physiologic tolerance of descending thoracic aortic balloon occlusion in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock. Surgery. 2013;153:848–56

  74. Park TS, Batchinsky AI, Belenkiy SM, Jordan BS, Baker WL, Necsoiu CN, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): comparison with immediate transfusion following massive hemorrhage in swine. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(6):930–6

  75. Hörer TMCP, Jans A, Nilsson K. A case of partial aortic ballon occlusion in an unstable multi-trauma patient. Trauma. 2016;18:150–4

  76. Johnson MA, Neff LP, Williams TK, DuBose JJ; EVAC Study Group. Partial resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (P-REBOA): clinical technique and rationale. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;81(5 Suppl 2 Proceedings of the 2015 Military Health System Research Symposium):S133-7

  77. Gansslen A, Hildebrand F, Pohlemann T. Management of hemodynamic unstable patients “in extremis” with pelvic ring fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79:193–202

  78. Lustenberger T, Wutzler S, Stormann P, Laurer H, Marzi I. The role of angioembolization in the acute treatment concept of severe pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 2015;46 Suppl 4:S33–8

  79. Suzuki T, Smith WR, Moore EE. Pelvic packing or angiography: competitive or complementary? Injury. 2009;40:343–53

  80. Agnew SG. Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994; 25: 715–21

  81. Hou Z, Smith WR, Strohecker KA, et al. Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture management by advanced trauma life support guidelines results in high mortality. Orthopedics. 2012;35:e319–24

  82. Cothren CC, Osborn PM, Moore EE, Morgan SJ, Johnson JL, Smith WR. Preperitonal pelvic packing for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a paradigm shift. J Trauma. 2007; 62: 834–9. discussion 9–42

  83. Smith WR, Moore EE, Osborn P, et al. Retroperitoneal packing as a resuscitation technique for hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures: report of two representative cases and a description of technique. J Trauma. 2005;59:1510–4

  84. Ertel W, Eid K, Keel M, Trentz O. Therapeutical Strategies and Outcome of Polytraumatized Patients with Pelvic InjuriesA Six-Year Experience. European Journal of Trauma. 2000; 26: 278–86

  85. Giannoudis PV, Pape HC. Damage control orthopaedics in unstable pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 2004;35:671–7

  86. Lustenberger T, Fau MC, Benninger E, Fau BE, Lenzlinger PM, Lenzlinger Pm F, Keel MJB, Keel MJ. C-clamp and pelvic packing for control of hemorrhage in patients with pelvic ring disruption. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011;4:477–82

  87. Osborn PM, Smith WR, Moore EE, et al. Direct retroperitoneal pelvic packing versus pelvic angiography: A comparison of two management protocols for haemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Injury. 2009;40:54–60

  88. Burlew CC, Moore EE, Smith WR, Johnson JL, Biffl WL, Barnett CC, Stahel PF. Preperitoneal pelvic packing/external fixation with secondary angioembolization: optimal care for life-threatening hemorrhage from unstable pelvic fractures. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(4):628–35

  89. Chiara O, di Fratta E, Mariani A, et al. Efficacy of extra-peritoneal pelvic packing in hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures, a Propensity Score Analysis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11:22

  90. Jang JY, Shim H, Jung PY, Kim S, Bae KS. Preperitoneal pelvic packing in patients with hemodynamic instability due to severe pelvic fracture: early experience in a Korean trauma center. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016;24:3

  91. Li Q, Dong J, Yang Y, Wang G, Wang Y, Liu P, Robinson Y, Zhou D. Retroperitoneal packing or angioembolization for haemorrhage control of pelvic fractures–Quasi-randomized clinical trial of 56 haemodynamically unstable patients with Injury Severity Score ≥33. Injury. 2016;47(2):395–401

  92. Brenner ML, Moore LJ, DuBose JJ, et al. A clinical series of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta for hemorrhage control and resuscitation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75:506–11

  93. Tai DK, Li WH, Lee KY, et al. Retroperitoneal pelvic packing in the management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures: a level I trauma center experience. J Trauma. 2011;71:E79–86

  94. Totterman A, Madsen JE, Skaga NO, Roise O. Extraperitoneal pelvic packing: a salvage procedure to control massive traumatic pelvic hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2007;62:843–52

  95. Halawi MJ. Pelvic ring injuries: Emergency assessment and management. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2015;6:252–8

  96. Esmer E, Esmer E, Derst P, Schulz M, Siekmann H, Delank KS; das TraumaRegister DGU®. Influence of external pelvic stabilization on hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures. Unfallchirurg. 2015. [Epub ahead of print]

  97. Poenaru DV, Popescu M, Anglitoiu B, Popa I, Andrei D, Birsasteanu F. Emergency pelvic stabilization in patients with pelvic posttraumatic instability. Int Orthop. 2015;39:961–5

  98. Rommens PM, Hofmann A, Hessmann MH. Management of Acute Hemorrhage in Pelvic Trauma: An Overview. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36:91–9

  99. Burgess A. Invited commentary: Young-Burgess classification of pelvic ring fractures: does it predict mortality, transfusion requirements, and nonorthopaedic injuries? J Orthop Trauma. 2010; 24:609

  100. Heini PF, Witt J, Ganz R. The pelvic C-clamp for the emergency treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries. A report on clinical experience of 30 cases. Injury. 1996;27 Suppl 1:S-A38–45

  101. Pohlemann T, Culemann U, Tosounidis G, Kristen A. Application of the pelvic C-clamp. Unfallchirurg. 2004;107:1185–91

  102. Witschger P, Heini P, Ganz R. Pelvic clamps for controlling shock in posterior pelvic ring injuries. Application, biomechanical aspects and initial clinical results. Orthopade. 1992; 21: 393–399.

  103. Koller H, Balogh ZJ. Single training session for first time pelvic C-clamp users: correct pin placement and frame assembly. Injury. 2012;43:436–9

  104. Koller H, Keil P, Seibert F. Individual and team training with first time users of the Pelvic C-Clamp: do they remember or will we need refresher trainings? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 133:343–9

  105. Metsemakers WJ, Vanderschot P, Jennes E, et al. Transcatheter embolotherapy after external surgical stabilization is a valuable treatment algorithm for patients with persistent haemorrhage from unstable pelvic fractures: outcomes of a single centre experience. Injury. 2013; 44: 964–8

  106. Panetta T, Sclafani SJ, Goldstein AS, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter embolization for massive bleeding from pelvic fractures. J Trauma. 1985;25:1021–9

  107. Rossaint R, Duranteau J, Stahel PF, Spahn DR. Nonsurgical treatment of major bleeding. Anesthesiol Clin. 2007;25:35–48. VIII

  108. Velmahos GC, Toutouzas KG, Vassiliu P, et al. A prospective study on the safety and efficacy of angiographic embolization for pelvic and visceral injuries. J Trauma. 2002;53:303–8. discussion 8

  109. Agolini SF, Shah K, Jaffe J, et al. Arterial embolization is a rapid and effective technique for controlling pelvic fracture hemorrhage. J Trauma. 1997;43:395–9

  110. Eastridge BJ, Starr A, Minei JP, O’Keefe GE, Scalea TM. The importance of fracture pattern in guiding therapeutic decision-making in patients withhemorrhagic shock and pelvic ring disruptions. J Trauma. 2002;53:446–50. discussion 50–1

  111. Hagiwara A, Minakawa K, Fukushima H, et al. Predictors of death in patients with life-threatening pelvic hemorrhage after successful transcatheter arterial embolization. J Trauma. 2003; 55: 696–703

  112. Heetveld MJ, Harris I, Schlaphoff G, Sugrue M. Guidelines for the management of haemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture patients. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74:520–9

  113. Miller PR, Moore PS, Mansell E, et al. External fixation or arteriogram in bleeding pelvic fracture: initial therapy guided by markers of arterial hemorrhage. J Trauma. 2003;54:437–43

  114. Shapiro M, McDonald AA, Knight D, et al. The role of repeat angiography in the management of pelvic fractures. J Trauma. 2005; 58: 227–31

  115. Thorson CM, Ryan ML, Otero CA, et al. Operating room or angiography suite for hemodynamically unstable pelvic fractures? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 72:364–70.

  116. Verbeek DO, Sugrue M, Balogh Z, et al. Acute management of hemodynamically unstable pelvic trauma patients: time for a change? Multicenter review of recent practice. World J Surg. 2008; 32: 1874–82

  117. Chu CH, Tennakoon L, Maggio PM, et al. Trends in the management of pelvic fractures, 2008–2010. J Surg Res. 2016; 202:335–40

  118. Sarin EL, Moore JB, Moore EE, et al. Pelvic fracture pattern does not always predict the need for urgent embolization. J Trauma. 2005;58:973–7

  119. Kimbrell BJ, Velmahos GC, Chan LS, Demetriades D. Angiographic embolization for pelvic fractures in older patients. Arch Surg. 2004;139:728–32.

  120. Jones CB. Posterior pelvic ring injuries: when to perform open reduction and internal fixation. Instr Course Lect. 2012;61:27–38

  121. Bazylewicz D, Konda S. A Review of the Definitive Treatment of Pelvic Fractures. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2016;74:6–11

  122. Sembler Soles GL, Lien J, Tornetta 3rd P. Nonoperative immediate weightbearing of minimally displaced lateral compression sacral fractures does not result in displacement. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:563–7

  123. Suzuki T, Morgan SJ, Smith WR, et al. Stress radiograph to detect true extent of symphyseal disruption in presumed anteroposterior compression type I pelvic injuries. J Trauma. 2010; 69: 880–5

  124. Hak DJ, Baran S, Stahel P. Sacral fractures: current strategies in diagnosis and management. Orthopedics. 2009;32(10)

  125. Kach K, Trentz O. Distraction spondylodesis of the sacrum in “vertical shear lesions” of the pelvis. Unfallchirurg. 1994;97:28–38

  126. Lindahl J, Makinen TJ, Koskinen SK, Soderlund T. Factors associated with outcome of spinopelvic dissociation treated with lumbopelvic fixation. Injury. 2014;45:1914–20

  127. Min KS, Zamorano DP, Wahba GM, et al. Comparison of two-transsacral-screw fixation versus triangular osteosynthesis for transforaminal sacral fractures. Orthopedics. 2014; 37: e754–60

  128. Putnis SE, Pearce R, Wali UJ, Bircher MD, Rickman MS. Open reduction and internal fixation of a traumatic diastasis of the pubic symphysis: one-year radiological and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2011;93:78–84

  129. Sagi HC. Technical aspects and recommended treatment algorithms in triangular osteosynthesis and spinopelvic fixation for vertical shear transforaminal sacral fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:354–60

  130. Sagi HC, Militano U, Caron T, Lindvall E. A comprehensive analysis with minimum 1-year follow-up of vertically unstable transforaminal sacral fractures treated with triangular osteosynthesis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23: 313–9. discussion 9–21

  131. Schildhauer TA, Josten C, Muhr G. Triangular osteosynthesis of vertically unstable sacrum fractures: a new concept allowing early weight-bearing. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:S44–51

  132. Suzuki T, Hak DJ, Ziran BH, et al. Outcome and complications of posterior transiliac plating for vertically unstable sacral fractures. Injury. 2009;40:405–9

  133. Scaglione M, Parchi P, Digrandi G, Latessa M, Guido G. External fixation in pelvic fractures. Musculoskelet Surg. 2010;94:63–70

  134. Vaidya R, Colen R, Vigdorchik J, Tonnos F, Sethi A. Treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with an internal anterior fixator and posterior fixation: initial clinical series. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26:1–8

  135. Barei DP, Shafer BL, Beingessner DM, Gardner MJ, Nork SE, Routt ML. The impact of open reduction internal fixation on acute pain management in unstable pelvic ring injuries. J Trauma. 2010;68:949–53

  136. Stahel PF, Hammerberg EM. History of pelvic fracture management: a review. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11:18

  137. Balbachevsky D, Belloti JC, Doca DG, et al. Treatment of pelvic fractures — a national survey. Injury. 2014;45 Suppl 5:S46–51

  138. Childs BR, Nahm NJ, Moore TA, Vallier HA. Multiple Procedures in the Initial Surgical Setting: When Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks in Patients With Multiple System Trauma? J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:420–5

  139. Enninghorst N, Toth L, King KL, McDougall D, Mackenzie S, Balogh ZJ. Acute definitive internal fixation of pelvic ring fractures in polytrauma patients: a feasible option. J Trauma. 2010;68:935–41

  140. Nahm NJ, Moore TA, Vallier HA. Use of two grading systems in determining risks associated with timing of fracture fixation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77:268–79

  141. Pape HC, Tornetta P, Tarkin I. et al. Timing of fracture fixation in multitrauma patients: the role of early total care and damage control surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17:541–9

  142. Schreiber VM, Tarkin IS, Hildebrand F, et al. The timing of definitive fixation for major fractures in polytrauma–a matched-pair comparison between a US and European level I centres: analysis of current fracture management practice in polytrauma. Injury. 2011;42:650–654.

  143. Vallier HA, Cureton BA, Ekstein C, et al. Early definitive stabilization of unstable pelvis and acetabulum fractures reduces morbidity. J Trauma. 2010;69:677–84

  144. Vallier HA, Moore TA, Como JJ, et al. Complications are reduced with a protocol to standardize timing of fixation based on response to resuscitation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:155

  145. Pape HC, Giannoudis PV, Krettek C, Trentz O. Timing of fixation of major fractures in blunt polytrauma: role of conventional indicators in clinical decision making. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19:551–62

  146. Pape HC, Griensven MV, Hildebrand FF, et al. Systemic inflammatory response after extremity or truncal fracture operations. J Trauma. 2008;65: 1379–84

  147. Probst C, Probst T, Gaensslen A, Krettek C, Pape HC. Timing and duration of the initial pelvic stabilization after multiple trauma in patients from the German trauma registry: is there an influence on outcome? J Trauma. 2007; 62:370–7. discussion 6–7

  148. Pape H, Stalp M, v Griensven M, et al. Optimal timing for secondary surgery in polytrauma patients: an evaluation of 4,314 serious-injury cases. Chirurg. 1999;70:1287–93

  149. D’Alleyrand JC, O’Toole RV. The evolution of damage control orthopedics: current evidence and practical applications of early appropriate care. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013;44:499–507

  150. Katsoulis E, Giannoudis PV. Impact of timing of pelvic fixation on functional outcome. Injury. 2006;37:1133–42

  151. Pape HC, Giannoudis P, Krettek C. The timing of fracture treatment in polytrauma patients: relevance of damage control orthopedic surgery. Am J Surg. 2002;183:622–9

  152. Pape HC, Lefering R, Butcher N, et al. The definition of polytrauma revisited: An international consensus process and proposal of the new ‘Berlin definition’. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77:780–6

  153. Scalea TM. Optimal timing of fracture fixation: have we learned anything in the past 20 years? J Trauma. 2008;65:253–60

  154. Scalea TM, Boswell SA, Scott JD, et al. External fixation as a bridge to intramedullary nailing for patients with multiple injuries and with femur fractures: damage control orthopedics. J Trauma. 2000;48:613–21. discussion 21–3.

  155. Bitchuk DD, Kovalev SI, Istomin AG, et al. [Extra-focal pelvic osteosynthesis in polytrauma]. Ortoped. Travmatol. Protezir. 1996; (2):48-50. (In Russ.)

  156. Ushakov SA, Lukin SYu, Istoksky KN, et al. [Treatment of pelvic trauma complicated by urogenital tract injuries]. Geniy Ortopedii. 2011;(1):140-44. (In Russ.)

  157. Batpenov ND, Baimagambetov ShA, Makhambetchin MM. [Intestinal injury by a bone fragment in unstable pelvic fractures in patients with polytrauma]. Travmatol. Ortoped. Rossii. 2011;62(4):100-104. (In Russ.)

  158. Chemiris AI, Neryanov YuM, Kudievsky AV, et al. Errors and shortcomings in providing first aid to polytrauma victims at the pre-hospital stage. Travma. 2003;4(5):587-90.

  159. Goncharov SF, Borisenko LV. Tasks of the All-Russian Disaster Medicine Service in implementing the target road safety program. Meditsina Katastrof. 2006;(3):5-7.

  160. Shevchenko VS. Providing care to victims with polytrauma at the stage of the acute period of traumatic disease. Travma. 2003;4(4):454-56.

  161. Bondarenko AV, Peleganchuk VA, Gerasimova OA. Hospital mortality in combined trauma and possibilities for its reduction. Vestn. Traumatologii i Ortopedii. 2004;(3):49-52.

  162. Bychkov VV. Main directions for optimizing medical care provision to road traffic accident victims. Travma. 2009;10(4):430-33.

  163. Wolinsky PR. Assessment and management of pelvic fracture in the hemodynamically un-stable patient. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997 Jul;28(3):321-29.

  164. Fitzgerald CA, Morse BC, Dente CJ. Pelvic ring fractures: has mortality improved following the implementation of damage control resuscitation? Am J Surg. 2014; 208(6): 1083-90.

  165. Abrassart S, Stern R, Peter R. Unstable pelvic ring injury with hemodynamic instability: What seems the best procedure choice and sequence in the initial management? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(2):175-82.

  166. Hou Z, Smith WR, Strohecker KA. Morgan Steven J. Hemodynamically unstable pelvic fracture management by advanced trauma life support guidelines results in high mortality. Or-thopedics. 2012; 35(3): e319-24.

  167. Müller ME, Schneider R, Willenegger H, Allgower M, ed. Manual of Internal Fixation. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg; 1991. 410 p.

  168. Vlasov AP, Shevalayev GA. Systemic coagulation-lytic distress syndrome in traumatic disease. Traumatologiya i Ortopediya Rossii. 2014;(1):80-85.

  169. Babosha VA, Pasternak VN, Lobanov VN. Unstable pelvic injuries — pre-hospital care stage. Ortopediya Travmatol. Protezir. 2002;(3):147-51.

  170. Lobanov GV. External fixation of pelvic injuries (morphological and experimental-mechanical study). Vestn. Ortopeda Travmatol. Protezirovaniya. 1999;25(1):141-42.

  171. Lobanov GV, Oksimets VM, Ostroverkhov OA, Borovoy IS. Choice of treatment tactics for patients with multiple injuries of the hip joint area in the acute trauma period. Litopys Travmatolohiyi ta Ortopediyi. 2003;(1,2):48-50.

  172. Kolesnikov VV, Onishchenko NS, Dushkin OF. Use of the "Kashtan" anti-shock suit in the treatment of severe combined trauma. Vestn Traumatologii Ortopedii im NN Priorova. 2002;(2):9-13.

  173. Schildhauer TA, Wilber JH, Patterson BM. Posterior locked lateral compression injury of the pelvis: report of three cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2000; 14(2): 107-11.

  174. Sokolov VA, Didenko AA, Makarov SA. Use of the "Kashtan" suit for non-infusion correction of acute blood loss and shock in trauma. Vestn Intensiv Terapii. 1993;(2-3):23-26.

  175. Dyatlov MM. [Pelvic blood vessel injuries in unstable fractures and dislocations in patients with polytrauma]. Vestnik Travmatologii i Ortopedii imeni N.N. Priorova. 1999;(2):27-33. (In Russ.)

  176. Failinger MS, McGanity PL. Unstable fractures of the pelvic ring. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Jun;74(5):781-91.

  177. Shirley PJ. Transportation of the critically ill and injured patient. Hosp Med. 2000;61(6):406-10. doi: 10.12968/hosp.2000.61.6.1356.

  178. Gumanenko EK, Shapovalov VM, Dulaev AK, Dydykin AV. [Modern approaches to the treatment of casualties with unstable injuries of the pelvic ring]. Voenno-Meditsinskii Zhurnal. 2003;(4):17-24. (In Russ.)

  179. Ankin LN. [Problems of improving the treatment of pelvic injuries]. Ortopediya Travmatologiya i Protezirovanie. 2009;(2):96-101. (In Russ.)

  180. Tile M, Helfet DL, Kellam JF, eds. Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003. 830 p.

  181. Kukuruz YS, Burlaka VV, Bondarenko VV. [Surgical treatment of combined injuries of the pelvis and pelvic organs]. Visnyk Ortopediyi Travmatolohiyi ta Protezuvannya. 2003;(2):39-44. (In Ukr.)

  182. Rosseman R. A brief history of MAST. Pago: Wise Inc., 2001.

  183. Pasternak VN, Babosha VA, Lobanov GV. [Unstable pelvic injuries: management in the acute trauma period from the perspective of disaster medicine]. Ukrainskyi Zhurnal Ekstremalnoi Medytsyny imeni G.O. Mozaeva. 2004;(4):59-63. (In Russ.)

  184. Mardanpour K1, Rahbar M. The outcome of surgically treated traumatic unstable pelvic fractures by open reduction and internal fixation. J Inj Violence Res. 2013 Jul;5(2):77-83. doi: 10.5249/jivr.v5i2.138.

  185. Bassam D, Cephas GA, Ferguson KA, Beard LN, Young JS. A protocol for the initial man-agement of unstable pelvic fractures. Am Surg. 1998 Sep;64(9):862-67.

  186. Pape HC, Giannoudis P, Krettek C. The timing of fracture treatment in polytrauma patients: relevance of damage control orthopedic surgery. Am J Surg. 2002 Jun;183(6):622-29.

  187. Beydik OV, Levchenko KK, Lyubitskiy AP, Gabatkin AI, Afanasyev DV, Shevchenko KV, et al. [Comparative evaluation of the rigidity of bone fragment fixation using wire, pin, and wire-pin methods of external transfixation osteosynthesis]. Geniy Ortopedii. 2003;(1):109-14. (In Russ.)

  188. Simonian PT, Routt ML Jr, Harrington RM, Tencer AF. Anterior versus posterior provision-al fixation in the unstable pelvis. A biomechanical comparison. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jan;(310):245-51.

  189. Cherkes-Zade DI, Lapshin VB, Nozhin NP, Kamenev AF. [Treatment of pelvic injuries using external fixation devices]. Ortopediya Travmatologiya i Protezirovanie. 1993;(3):44-47. (In Russ.)

  190. Ankin LN, Ankin NL. [Pelvic Injuries and Acetabular Fractures]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Kniga plus; 2007. 216 p. (In Russ.)

  191. Gudz AI, Denisov AO, Lasunskiy SA, Shubnyakov II, Shilnikov VA, Sorokin EP, Stafeev DV, Chugaev DV. [Treatment of complex acetabular fractures and their sequelae]. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal imeni N.I. Pirogova. 2017;(2):70-76. (In Russ.)

  192. Peitzman AB, Rhodes M, Schwab CW, Yealy DM, Fabian TC. The Trauma manual. 2nd ed. Lippincott: Williams and Wilkins; 2003. 310 p.

  193. Dzupa V, Pavelka T, Taller S. Pelvic ring injury as part of multiple trauma. Rozhl Chir. 2014;93(5):292-96.

  194. Shapovalov VM, Dulaev AK, Dydykin AV. [Experimental development and clinical application of minimally invasive internal rod fixation of the pelvic ring]. Vestnik Travmatologii i Ortopedii imeni N.N. Priorova. 2001;(4):33-37. (In Russ.)

  195. Pohlemann T. Prymary treatment of politrauma patients with pelvis trauma as leading injury. Eur J Trauma. 2002;(1):41-42.

  196. Balbachevsky D, Belloti JC, Doca DG, Jannarelli B, Junior JA, Fernandes HJ, et al. Treat-ment of pelvic fractures — a national survey. Injury. 2014 Nov;45(Suppl 5):S46-51. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(14)70021-X.

  197. Byalik EI, Fayn AM. [Staged treatment of injuries in the pubic symphysis area using an original fixator in patients with polytrauma and pelvic injury]. Politravma. 2013;(4):30-34. (In Russ.)

  198. Hiesterman TG, Hill BW, Cole PA. Surgical technique: a percutaneous method of subcuta-neous fixation for the anterior pelvic ring: the pelvic bridge. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Aug;470(8):2116-23. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2341-4.

  199. Chen HW, Liu GD, Ou S, Zhao GS, Pan J. Treatment of unstable sacral fractures with per-cutaneous reconstruction plate internal fixation. Acta Cir Bras. 2012 May;27(5):338-42. doi: 10.1590/S0102-86502012000500010.

  200. Li C. L. Clinical comparative analysis on unstable pelvic fractures in the treatment with per-cutaneous sacroiliac screws and sacroiliac joint anterior plate fixation. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(18):2704-8.

  201. Khanin MYu, Minasov BSh, Minasov TB, Yakupov RR, Zagitov BG. [Orthopedic damage control in pelvic injuries in patients with polytrauma]. Prakticheskaya Meditsina. 2011;(6):122-25. (In Russ.)

  202. Smirnov AA. [Surgical treatment of vertically unstable pelvic injuries (AO type C)]. Travmatologiya i Ortopediya Rossii. 2012;(1):73-76. (In Russ.)

  203. Donchenko SV, Dubrov VE, Slinyakov LYu, et al. [Algorithm for surgical treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries]. Vestnik Travmatologii i Ortopedii imeni N.N. Priorova. 2013;(4):9-16. (In Russ.)

  204. Dyatlova MM. [Complex Pelvic Injuries]. Gomel; 2006. (In Russ.)

  205. Kornilov NV, ed. [Traumatology and Orthopedics: A Guide for Physicians in 4 volumes]. Saint Petersburg: Hippocrates; 2004-2006. Vol. 4. (In Russ.)

  206. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Nizhny Novgorod Region No. 1426 dated July 1, 2014, «On the use of the scale for comprehensive assessment of polytrauma severity in victims of road traffic accidents on highways of the Nizhny Novgorod Region». (In Russ.)

  207. Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W, Long WB. The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J. Trauma. 1974; 14(3): 187–196.

  208. Kotelnikov GP, Mironov SP, eds. [Traumatology: National Guideline]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2017. 528 p. (In Russ.)

  209. Matveev RP, Barachevsky YuE, Baranov AV. [Pelvic Injuries: Medical and Tactical Characteristics of Pelvic Trauma in a Regional Center of Russia]. Arkhangelsk: Northern State Medical University Press; 2014. 146 p. (In Russ.)

  210. Nguyen ATM, Drynan DP, Holland AJA. Paediatric pelvic fractures - an updated literature review. ANZ J Surg. 2022; 92 (12): 3182-3194.

  211. Vadhera AS, Knapik DM, Gursoy S, et al. Avulsion fractures of the ischial tuberosity in the pediatric athlete: a systematic review and return to sport analysis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2022; 31(5): 508-516.

  212. Guillaume JM, Pesenti S, Jouve JL, Launay F. Pelvic fractures in children (pelvic ring and acetabulum). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106(1S): S125-S133.

  213. Zwingmann J., Lefering R., Maier D. et al. Pelvic fractures in severely injured children: Results from the TraumaRegister DGU. Medicine. 2018; 97(35): e11955.

  214. Munro J., Booth A., Nicholl J. Routine preoperative testing: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Technol. Assess. 1997; 1 (12): 1–62.

  215. Klyuchevsky V.V. Injury Surgery: A Guide for Physician Assistants, Surgeons, and Traumatologists of District Hospitals. 2nd ed. Yaroslavl; Rybinsk: Rybinsk House of Printing, 2004. 787 p.

  216. Waldron N.H., Jones C.A., Gan T.J. et al. Impact of perioperative dexamethasone on postoperative analgesia and side-effects: systematic review and meta-analysis. Brit. J. Anaesthesia. 2013; 110 (2): 191–200.

  217. Wick E.C., Grant M.C., Wu C.L. Postoperative multimodal analgesia pain management with nonopioid analgesics and techniques: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152 (7): 691.

  218. Doleman B., Mathiesen O., Sutton A.J. et al. Non-opioid analgesics for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br. J. Anaesth. 2023; 130 (6): 719-728

  219. Hsu J.R. Mir H., Wally M.K., Seymour R.B.; Orthopaedic Trauma Association Musculoskeletal Pain Task Force. Clinical practice guidelines for pain management in acute musculoskeletal injury. J. Orthopaedic Trauma. 2019; 33 (5): e158–e182.

  220. Lee S.K., Lee J.W., Choy W.S. Is multimodal analgesia as effective as postoperative patient-controlled analgesia following upper extremity surgery? Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2013; 99 (8): 895–901.

  221. Richman J.M., Liu S.S., Courpas G. et al. Does continuous peripheral nerve block provide superior pain control to opioids? A meta-analysis. Anesth. Analg. 2006; 102 (1): 248–257.

  222. Bratzler D.W., Dellinger E.P., Olsen K.M. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Amer. J. Health-System Pharm. 2013; 70 (3): 195–283.

  223. AO Principles of Fracture Management: Vol. 1: Principles, Vol. 2: Specific fractures /ed. by R.E. Buckley, C.G. Moran, T. Apivatthakakul. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag, 2018.

  224. World Health Organization. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2018. 184 p.

  225. Sorger J.I., Kirk P.G., Ruhnke C.J. et al. Once daily, high dose versus divided, low dose gentamicin for open fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (366): 197-204.

  226. Hoff W.S., Bonadies J.A., Cachecho R., Dorlac W.C. East Practice Management Guidelines Work Group: update to practice management guidelines for prophylactic antibiotic use in open fractures. J Trauma. 2011; 70 (3): 751-754.

  227. Takahara S., Tokura T., Nishida R. et al. Ampicillin/sulbactam versus cefazolin plus aminoglycosides for antimicrobial prophylaxis in management of Gustilo type IIIA open fractures: A retrospective cohort study. Injury. 2022; 53 (4): 1517-1522.

  228. Briko N.I., Bozhkova S.A., Brusina E.B. et al.; National Association of Specialists in Healthcare-Associated Infections Control (NASCI). Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: Guidelines. Moscow, 2022. 74 p. [Electronic resource]. URL: https: //www.nasci.ru/?id=102733&download=1 (Access date: Apr 27, 2024).

  229. Messner J., Papakostidis C., Giannoudis P.V., Kanakaris N.K. Duration of administration of antibiotic agents for open fractures: meta-analysis of the existing evidence. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017; 18 (8): 854-867.

  230. Halm EA, Browner WS, Tubau JF, Tateo IM, Mangano DT. Echocardiography for assessing cardiac risk in patients having noncardiac surgery. Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group [published correction appears in Ann Intern Med 1997;126:494]. Ann Intern Med 1996; 125: 433– 41.

  231. Hamidi M., Zeeshan M., Sakran J.V. et al. Direct oral anticoagulants vs low-molecular-weight heparin for thromboprophylaxis in nonoperative pelvic fractures. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2019; 228 (1): 89–97.

  232. Jehan F., O’Keeffe T., Khan M. et al. Early thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin is safe in patients with pelvic fracture managed nonoperatively. J. Surg. Res. 2017; 219: 360–365.

  233. Falck-Ytter Y., Francis C.W., Johanson N.A. et al. Prevention of VTE in orthopedic surgery patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012; 141 (2, Suppl.):  e278S-e325S.

  234. Ricci W.M., Broekhuyse H., Keating J.F., et al. Thromboprophylaxis an update of current practice: Can we reach a consensus? OTA Int. 2019; 2 (4): e027.

  235. Steele N., Dodenhoff R.M., Ward A.J. et al. Thromboprophylaxis in pelvic and acetabular trauma surgery. The role of early treatment with low-molecular-weight heparin. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2005; 87 (2): 209–212.

  236. Benjamin E., Aiolfi A., Recinos G., et al. Timing of venous thromboprophylaxis in isolated severe pelvic fracture: Effect on mortality and outcomes. Injury. 2019; 50 (3): 697–702.

  237. Dwyer E.P., Moed B.R. Venous thromboembolism after hospital discharge in pelvic and acetabular fracture patients treated operatively. J. Orthop. Surg. Hong Kong. 2019; 27 (1): 2309499019832815.

  238. Anderson D.R., Morgano G.P., Bennett C., et al. American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients. Blood Adv. 2019; 3 (23): 3898–3944.

  239. Bozhkova SA, Tikhilov RM, Andriyashkin VV, et al. [Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of thromboembolic complications in traumatology and orthopedics: guidelines]. Traumatology and Orthopedics of Russia. 2022;28(3):136-166. (In Russ.)

  240. Seliverstov E.I., Lobastov K.V., Ilyukhin E.A. et al. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of deep vein thrombosis. Guidelines of Russian experts. Phlebology. 2023; 17 (3): 152-296.

  241. Zabolotskikh I.B., Kirov M.Y., Afonchikov V.S., et al. Perioperative management of patients receiving long-term antithrombotic therapy. Clinical Guidelines of the Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists of Russia. Bulletin of Intensive Care named after A.I. Saltanov. 2019; (1): 7–19.

  242. Abid H., El Idrissi M., El Ibrahimi A., Elmrini A. Tile type C pelvic fractures: initial management, surgery and rehabilitation results of 12 cases with literature review. J. Phys. Med. Rehab. Stud. Rep. 2021; 3(1): 1-8

  243. Aryee J., Stelmach J., Berke C. et al. Pelvic Fracture. In: Mostoufi S.A., George T.K., Tria Jr., A.J. (eds.) Clinical guide to musculoskeletal medicine. Springer, 2022: 177-178.

  244. Banierink, H., Reininga, I.H.F., Heineman E. et al.  Long-term physical functioning and quality of life after pelvic ring injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019. 139, 1225–1233.

  245. Bub M., Jawade S., Wadhokar O.C. Novel physiotherapeutic approach towards a case of complex multiple fracture. J. Med. Pharm. Allied Sci. 2021; 10 (4): 3453-3458.

  246. Küper M.A., Trulson A., Stuby F.M., Stöckle U. Pelvic ring fractures in the elderly. EFORT Open Rev. 2019; 4 (6): 313–320

  247. Meys G., Kalmet P.H.S., Sanduleanu S. et al. A protocol for permissive weight-bearing during allied health therapy in surgically treated fractures of the pelvis and lower extremities. J Rehabil Med. 2019; 51 (4): 290-297.

  248. Osborne S. Outpatient rehabilitation of a patient with a nondisplaced pelvic ring fracture following a high-energy: A Doctoral PROJECT. California State University, 2018. 42 p. Available from: https://scholars.csus.edu/esploro/outputs/99257831005201671 (accessed May 21, 2024).

  249. Piccione F., Maccarone M.C., Cortese A.M. et al. Rehabilitative management of pelvic fractures: a literature-based update. Eur. J. Translat. Myology. 2021; 31 (3).

  250. Poole W.E.C., Neilly D.W., Rickman M.S. Is unrestricted weight bearing immediately after fixation of rotationally unstable pelvic fractures safe? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23 (1): 348

  251. Pubic rami fracture /Therapy services. – Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 12 p.  URL: https://www.uhd.nhs.uk/uploads/about/docs/our_publications/patient_information_leaflets /orthopaedics/Pubic_rami_fracture.pdf

  252. Rickman M., Link B.C., Solomon L.B. Patient weight-bearing after pelvic fracture surgery-a systematic review of the literature: what is the modern evidence base? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2019; 14 (1): 45-52. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-0080-1414.

  253. Zou M., Duan X., Li M. et al. Comparison of the two surgery methods combined with accelerated rehabilitation in the treatment of lateral compression type 1 pelvic fractures in the elderly. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2023; 18 (1): 734.

  254. Borovoy IS, Lobanov GV. [Rehabilitation methodology for patients with type B unstable pelvic injuries treated with external fixation devices (a guide for practitioners)]. Travma. 2014;15(3):114-120. (In Russ.)

  255. Melkostupov AA, Komogortsev IE, Vinogradov VG, Angarskaya EG. [Early mobilization and axial loading on the lower extremities after surgical treatment of patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries (a brief literature review)]. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2023;8(5):92-99. (In Russ.)

  256. Shchotkin V.A., Chernyshev A.S., Ivanov P.A. et al. Early rehabilitation methodology in patients with pelvic ring injuries. Fizioter., Balneol. Reabil. 2013; (4): 13-16.

  257. Chernyshev V.A., Ivanov P.A. et al. Rehabilitation of patients with unstable pelvic ring injury in polytrauma during the early postoperative period. N.V. Sklifosovsky Journal "Emergency Medical Care". 2014; (4): 9-13

  258. Gänsslen A., Lindahl J., Grechenig S., Füchtmeier B. (eds) Pelvic ring fractures. Springer, 2021: 631p.

  259. Kennedy A.P., Ignacio R.C., Ricca R. (eds.) Pediatric Trauma Care. A Practical Guide. Springer, 2022: 572 p.

  260. Marzi I., Frank J., Rose S. Pediatric Skeletal Trauma. A Practical Guide. Berlin: Springer, 2022: 626 p.

  261. Vlasova A.V., Smirnova E.V., Tenovskaya T.A. et al. Protocol for perioperative and post-exposure antibiotic prophylaxis at the Morozov City Children's Clinical Hospital of the Moscow Healthcare Department. Metropolitan Health. 2021; 2 (2): 46-64.

  262. Opri F., Bianchini S., Nicoletti L. et al. on behalf of the Peri-Operative Prophylaxis in Neonatal and Paediatric Age (POP-NeoPed) Study Group. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients of neonatal and pediatric age undergoing orthopedic and hand surgery: A RAND /UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study. Antibiotics. 2022; 11: 289.

  263. Hauer J. Pain in children: Approach to pain assessment and overview of management principles // UpToDate. Poplack DG. Wolters Kluwer.

  264. Orliaguet G., Hamza J., Couloigner V., et al. A Case of Respiratory Depression in a Child With Ultrarapid CYP2D6 Metabolism After Tramadol // Pediatrics. 2015. Vol. 135, № 3. P. e753–e755.

  265. Schechter W. Pharmacologic management of acute perioperative pain in infants and children // UpToDate. Sun LS. Wolters Kluwer.

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

  1. Bortulev P.I., Candidate of Medical Sciences, National Medical Research Center of Children's Traumatology and Orthopedics

  2. named after G.I. Turner of the Russian Ministry of Health, Saint Petersburg.

  3. Geroyeva I.B., MD, Professor, Federal State Budgetary Institution "N.N. Priorov National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics" of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow.

  4. Gorbatyuk D.S., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Trauma and Orthopedic Surgeon, Department for Function Implementation of the National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov, Moscow, member of ASOR.

  5. Donchenko S.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of Traumatology Department No. 27, City Clinical Hospital named after S.P. Botkin of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow

  6. Dubrov V.E., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Chief freelance specialist traumatologist-orthopedist of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Head of the Department of General and Specialized Surgery, Faculty of Fundamental Medicine, Lomonosov Moscow State University,

  7. Moscow, member of ASOR.

  8. Zlobina Yu.S., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Organizational and Methodological Department for Traumatology and Orthopedics, Moscow Healthcare Department.

  9. Zorin V.I., PhD, Associate Professor, Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma of the Ministry of Health of Russia, St. Petersburg.

  10. Kleymeneva E.B., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director for Quality and Information Technology, National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow.

  11. Lazarev A.F., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Traumatology and Orthopedics

  12. National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov, Moscow, member of ASOR.

  13. Litvina E.A., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Supervisor of the First-Level Trauma Center of the Clinic of City Clinical Hospital named after M.P. Konchalovsky of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Professor of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow

  14. Mironov A.N., Head of Traumatology Department No. 1, City Clinical Hospital No. 13 of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow.

  15. Nazarenko A.G., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics

  16. named after N.N. Priorov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Vice-President of ASOR.

  17. Otdelenov V.A., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Rational Pharmacotherapy and Drug Supply Analysis, National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow.

  18. Solod E.I., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Function Implementation Department

  19. National Medical Research Center of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after N.N. Priorov, member of ASOR.

Conflict of interest.

The working group on drafting clinical guidelines for the treatment of pelvic ring injuries has no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience for these clinical guidelines:

  • Medical specialists:

    • trauma and orthopedic surgeons;

    • surgeons;

    • pediatric surgeons;

    • anesthesiologists-intensivists;

    • urologists;

    • obstetricians-gynecologists;

    • coloproctologists;

    • cardiovascular surgeons;

    • endovascular surgeones / specialists in X-ray endovascular diagnostics and treatment;

    • radiologists;

    • ultrasound diagnostics physicians;

    • functional diagnostics physicians;

    • emergency medicine physicians;

    • district general practitioners;

    • general practitioners (family physicians).

  • Paramedics.

  • Chief physicians (heads) of medical organizations.

  • Deputy heads (managers) of medical organizations.

  • Heads (managers) of a structural subdivision (department, unit, laboratory, office, squad, etc.) of a medical organization who are medical specialists.

  • Heads (chief physicians, managers) of a structural subdivision engaged in medical activities in another organization.

Methods used for evidence collection/selection

The development of these clinical guidelines was based on the guideline document "Pelvic Trauma: World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Classification and Guidelines" (2017) in a Russian adapted translation [25]. Methodology: "A bibliographic search was conducted in the MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and EMBASE databases for the period from January 1980 to December 2015 using keyword combinations with the Boolean operators "AND/OR": pelvis, pelvic, injuries, trauma, resuscitation, sacral, bone screws, fractures, external fixation, internal fixation, anterior and posterior fixation, hemodynamic instability/stability, tamponade, pubic symphysis, angioembolization, pelvic belt, aortic, balloon, occlusion, resuscitative, definite, stabilization. There were no search parameter restrictions. The study time frame was chosen to ensure full access to clinical studies, consensus conferences, comparative studies, congresses, clinical guidelines, government publications, multicenter studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, large case series, original articles, and randomized controlled trials. Case reports and small case series were excluded. Not a single randomized controlled trial was found (one randomized controlled trial [19] was found during the preparation of these clinical guidelines — italics ours). Narrative reviews were also analyzed to identify suitable studies."

Table 1. Level of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

Table 2. Level of evidence (LoE) grading scale for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

LoE

Definitions

1

Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis

2

Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

Table 3. Grade of Recommendation (GoR) scale for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

GoR

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.

The update mechanism for clinical guidelines involves their systematic review — at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or when justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines arise, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

Appendix A3.1. Guidelines for pain management in major musculoskeletal trauma (surgical interventions for long bone fracture fixation or complex articular fracture, extensive soft tissue trauma, major surgery, etc.) in adults

The table presents analgesic medications and their dosage regimens in accordance with the Clinical Guideline for Pain Management in Acute Musculoskeletal Trauma [213].

Stage of treatment

Opioid analgesics

Non-opioid analgesics and gabapentin

Inpatient setting

Trimeperidine** 25–50 mg orally. Maximum single dose is 50 mg, maximum daily dose is 200 mg.

Ketorolac** 15 mg IV every 6 hours x 5 doses, then #ibuprofen** 600 mg orally every 8 hours [213]

OR Trimeperidine** 10–40 mg (from 1 ml of 10 mg/ml solution to 2 ml of 20 mg/ml solution) IM, SC, or IV. Maximum single dose is 40 mg, daily dose is 160 mg.

Gabapentin 300 mg 3 times daily [213]

Morphine** 10–30 mg IM or SC as needed for severe breakthrough pain

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours

Outpatient stage

First week (after discharge)

Tramadol** single dose 100 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 100 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

#Ibuprofen** 600 mg orally every 8 hours for 7 days [213]

#Gabapentin 100 mg 1 tablet orally 3 times daily for 7 days [213]

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours for 7 days

Second week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

Gabapentin 300 mg 3 times a day (gradually titrate up to the maximum daily dose if necessary: 3600 mg/day)

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are tapered)

Third week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

Gabapentin as needed (max. 3600 mg/day)

Paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 12 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are tapered)

Fourth week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

Gabapentin as needed (max. 3600 mg/day)

Paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 8 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are tapered)

Fifth week and beyond

-

NSAIDs as needed

Paracetamol** as needed

Gabapentin as needed, then discontinue.

Appendix A3.2. Guidelines for pain management in musculoskeletal trauma without surgery (closed fractures, superficial wounds, etc.) in adults

The table presents analgesic medications and their dosage regimens in accordance with the Clinical Guideline for Pain Management in Acute Musculoskeletal Trauma [213].

Type of injury

Opioid analgesics

Non-opioid analgesics

Minor trauma (minor bone fractures, sprains, superficial wounds)

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed,

paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 8 hours, then as needed

OR tramadol** single dose 50 mg IV as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

Major trauma (major bone fractures, ruptures)

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed,

paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 12 hours, then as needed

OR Tramadol** single dose 50 mg IV on demand, if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg in 30-60 minutes. Maximum daily dose 400 mg.

Appendix A3.3 Analgesic dosage regimen for children

Medicinal products

Single dose

Dosing regimen

Maximum daily dose

Maximum duration of use

Non-narcotic analgesic

Paracetamol**

Rectal suppositories:

3-6 months (6-8 kg): 50 mg

rectally at intervals of at least 4-6 hours

100 mg/day

Not specified in the instructions

7-12 months (8-11 kg): 100 mg

200 mg/day

1-4 years (12-16 kg): 100 mg

400 mg/day

5-9 years (17-30 kg): 250 mg

1000 mg/day

10-14 years: 500 mg

2000 mg/day

over 15 years: 500 mg

4000 mg/day

IV infusion:

10 kg and under: 7.5 mg/kg (0.75 ml/kg)

no more than 4 times/day, interval between infusions at least 4 hours

no more than 30 mg/kg/day

Not specified in the instructions

from 10 kg up to 33 kg inclusive: 15 mg/kg (1.5 ml/kg)

less than 60 mg/kg inclusive, but not more than 2 g

from 33 to 50 kg inclusive: 15 mg/kg (1.5 ml/kg)

less than 60 mg/kg inclusive, but not more than 3 g

over 50 kg: 1 g (100 ml)

no more than 4 g/day

Tablets

3-5 years: 200 mg

Every 4-6 hours

no more than 4 times a day

6-8 years: 250 mg

no more than 4 times a day

9-11 years: 500 mg

no more than 4 times a day

Over 12 years: 500-1000 mg

no more than 4 g/day

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Diclofenac**

Powder for oral solution

14-18 years: 50-100 mg

0.5-2 mg/kg per day orally, daily dose divided into 2-3 single doses

150 mg

7 days

Tablets:

6-14 years: 25 mg

0.5-2 mg/kg per day orally, daily dose divided into 2-3 single doses

150 mg

7 days

14-18 years: 25-50 mg

Ibuprofen**

Suspension (100 mg/5 ml):

3-6 months (5-7.6 kg): 2.5 ml (50 mg)

orally up to 3 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

7.5 ml (150 mg)

Not specified in the instructions

6-12 months (7.7-9 kg): 2.5 ml (50 mg)

orally 3-4 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

10 ml (200 mg)

1-3 years (10-16 kg): 5 ml

orally up to 3 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

15 ml (300 mg)

4–6 years (17–20 kg): 7.5 ml

22.5 ml (450 mg)

7–9 years (21–30 kg): 10 ml

30 ml (600 mg)

10–12 years (31–40 kg): 15 ml

45 ml (900 mg)

Suspension (200 mg / 5 ml):

1–3 years (10–16 kg): 2.5 ml (100 mg)

orally up to 3 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

7.5 ml (300 mg)

Not specified in the instructions

4–6 years (17–20 kg): 3.75 ml (150 mg)

11.25 ml (450 mg)

7–9 years (21–30 kg): 5 ml (200 mg)

15 ml (600 mg)

10–12 years (31–40 kg): 7.5 ml (300 mg)

22.5 ml (900 mg)

over 12 years (over 40 kg): 7.5–10 ml (300–400 mg)

30 ml (1200 mg)

Tablets:

aged 6 to 12 years (body weight > 20 kg): 200 mg

orally up to 4 times/day with an interval of at least 6 hours

800 mg

Not specified in the instructions

children over 12 years: 200 mg

orally 3–4 times/day with an interval of at least 6 hours

rectal suppositories, [FOR CHILDREN]

3–9 months (6.0 kg – 8.0 kg): 1 suppository (60 mg)

Up to 3 times per 24 hours, maximum 180 mg per day

30 mg/kg with dosing intervals of 6–8 hours

Maximum 3 days

9 months – 2 years (8.0 kg – 12.0 kg): 1 suppository (60 mg)

Up to 4 times per 24 hours, maximum 240 mg per day

Ketorolac**

Tablets:

children over 16 years: 10 mg

orally up to 4 times/day

40 mg

5 days

Parenteral solution

over 16 years: 10–30 mg

IV, IM with an interval of at least 6 hours

90 mg

2 days

Opioid and opioid-like analgesics

Morphine**

Oral solution/tablets

3 to 7 years: 5 mg

orally, every 6 hours

20 mg

Not specified in the instructions

7 to 17 years with body weight up to 70 kg: 5 mg

orally,

every 4 hours

30 mg

7 to 17 years with body weight of 70 kg or more: 10 mg

60 mg

17 years and older: 5–10 mg

Not specified in the instructions

Parenteral solution:

birth to 2 years: 100–200 mcg/kg body weight (0.1–0.2 mg/kg)

SC, if necessary every 4–6 hours.

15 mg

Not specified in the instructions

over 2 years: 100–200 mcg/kg body weight (0.1–0.2 mg/kg)

SC if necessary every 4–6 hours

Tramadol**1

Parenteral solution

1 to 12 years*: 1–2 mg/kg

IV, IM, SC

8 mg/kg/day or maximum 400 mg/day

from 12 years: 50–100 mg

IV, IM, SC; if satisfactory analgesia is not achieved 30–60 minutes after the initial dose, an additional 50 mg may be administered

400 mg/day

Not specified in the instructions

Tablets:

children over 14 years of age:

50–100 mg

orally; if satisfactory analgesia is not achieved within 30–60 minutes after the initial administration, an additional 50 mg may be prescribed

400 mg/day

Not specified in the instructions

Trimeperidine**

Parenteral solution

Children2 over 2 years of age: 3–10 mg

IV, IM, SC

Not specified in the instructions

Not specified in the instructions

Fentanyl**

Parenteral solution

children from 1 year of age with spontaneous breathing: initial dose 3–5 mcg/kg, additional dose 1 mcg/kg.

IV

Not specified in the instructions

Not specified in the instructions

children from 1 year of age receiving mechanical ventilation: initial dose 15 mcg/kg, additional dose 1–3 mcg/kg.

IV

Not specified in the instructions

Not specified in the instructions

1 In children under 12 years of age, morphine** is preferred when opioid analgesics need to be prescribed, as the use of tramadol** is associated with a higher risk of adverse reactions [257,258].

2 Not recommended for use in children, as its metabolite accumulates in the body and provokes seizures upon repeated administration [259].

Appendix A3.4. Recommended dosage regimen of low-molecular-weight heparins for the prevention of high-risk VTE in conservative treatment and orthopedic surgery in adult patients at high risk of VTE

The table is compiled based on the instructions for medical use of parenteral anticoagulants.

Drug

Recommended doses, frequency, and route of administration

Sodium heparin**

Subcutaneously, 5,000 IU 3 times daily

For interventions, the first injection is given 1–2 hours before surgery

Bemiparin sodium

Subcutaneously, 3,500 IU anti-Xa once daily

For interventions, 2 hours before surgery or 6 hours after, and every 24 hours on subsequent days

Daltaparin sodium

Choose one of the dosing regimens below.

  • if prophylaxis is initiated the day before surgery: 5,000 IU SC on the evening prior to surgery, then 5,000 IU SC every evening after surgery.

  • if prophylaxis is initiated on the day of surgery: 2,500 IU SC 2 hours before surgery and 2,500 IU SC 8–12 hours later, but not earlier than 4 hours after the end of surgery. Then from the next day, 5,000 IU SC every morning.

  • if prophylaxis is initiated after surgery: 2,500 IU SC 4–8 hours after surgery, but not earlier than 4 hours after the end of surgery. Then from the next day, 5,000 IU SC daily.

Nadroparin calcium

Subcutaneously (standard dosage: 9,500 anti-Xa IU/ml):

  1. For VTE prophylaxis in patients at high risk of thrombosis:

    1. for body weight up to 70 kg, 0.4 ml once daily;

    2. for body weight of 70 kg and above, 0.6 ml once daily;

    3. for elderly patients, it is advisable to reduce the dose to 0.3 ml.

  2. For orthopedic interventions:

    1. For body weight up to 50 kg, 0.2 ml 12 hours before and 12 hours after surgery, then once daily until the 3rd day after surgery; from the 4th day after surgery, 0.3 ml once daily;

    2. For body weight up to 50–69 kg, 0.3 ml 12 hours before and 12 hours after surgery, then once daily until the 3rd day after surgery; from the 4th day after surgery, 0.4 ml once daily.

    3. For body weight of 70 kg and above, 0.4 ml 12 hours before and 12 hours after surgery, then once daily until the 3rd day after surgery; from the 4th day after surgery, 0.6 ml once daily.

Enoxaparin sodium**

Subcutaneously, 40 mg once daily

For interventions, 12 hours before and 12 hours after surgery, then once daily throughout the postoperative period

Parnaparin sodium**

Subcutaneously, 0.4 ml (4,250 anti-Xa IU) once daily

For interventions, 12 hours before and 12 hours after surgery, then once daily throughout the postoperative period

It should be noted that spinal or epidural anesthesia can only be performed 12 hours after the administration of a low-molecular-weight heparin dose and no earlier than 4–6 hours after the administration of unfractionated heparin (meanwhile, APTT or ACT values must be within the normal range) [235].

Appendix A3.5. Recommended intervals between prophylactic anticoagulant administration and neuraxial interventions [12]

Anticoagulant

Before neuraxial intervention

(minimum time between the last anticoagulant dose and the neuraxial procedure)

With an indwelling epidural catheter

After epidural catheter removal

(timing for resuming anticoagulant administration)

Sodium heparin**

4-6 h

Preferred

anticoagulant

1 h

LMWH B01AB in prophylactic dose

  • enoxaparin sodium** 40 mg once daily SC (with normal renal function);

  • enoxaparin sodium** 20 mg once daily SC

  • (at creatinine clearance <30 ml/min)

≥12 h

≥24 h

(at creatinine clearance <30 ml/min)

At least 8 hours must elapse between catheter placement and subcutaneous LMWH injection.

The catheter should be removed no earlier than 12 hours after subcutaneous LMWH injection.

4 h

fondaparinux sodium

36-72 h

Contraindicated

6 h

dabigatran etexilate**

3-5 days

rivaroxaban**

3 days

apixaban**

3 days

Time intervals between neuraxial intervention and anticoagulant administration are presented in accordance with the European Guidelines on Perioperative VTE Prophylaxis [12].

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix B. Algorithms for physician actions — Pelvic Ring Injuries

Appendix C. Patient Information

In cases of pelvic ring injuries, emergency hospitalization to a hospital is indicated to rule out life-threatening conditions such as internal bleeding and pelvic organ trauma. After examinations (radiography, abdominal and pelvic ultrasound), the treatment method is determined: conservative (for mild injuries) and surgical (for moderate and severe injuries). Conservative treatment involves positioning therapy or skeletal traction with prolonged bed rest for 2–2.5 months. Surgical treatment includes hemostasis methods and primary stabilization by applying external fixation devices. Subsequently, once the patient's condition stabilizes, the approach transitions to definitive stabilization using external fixation devices (reusable external orthopedic fixation systems) or internal implants (non-absorbable, sterile internal orthopedic fixation systems using plates/screws).

Pelvic injuries may also be accompanied by injuries to intrapelvic organs, which requires surgical treatment. One-stage or staged treatment of bladder and urethral ruptures can be used: closure of bladder ruptures, urethroplasty, or creation of an epicystostomy followed by subsequent bladderoplasty with closure of the bladder wall defect.

The use of surgical treatment methods for the pelvic ring allows for early mobilization of both young and elderly patients. Patients are mobilized with crutches/walkers 5–7 days after surgery, provided there are no contraindications related to the patient's general condition, and walking with assistive support is prescribed for a period of 2–3 months.

Control radiographs are performed at 2–3 months, based on which the physician decides on expanding the orthopedic regimen.

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Appendix G1 — Injury Severity Score

Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) [208]

Developer website: https://www.aaam.org/abbreviated-injury-scale-ais/

Type (underline): rating scale

Purpose: assessment of injury severity.

Content: a system of scoring criteria for assessing injury severity

Key (interpretation): 

Type of injury

Injury severity score

Score

EXTREMITIES

Contusion of the elbow, shoulder, hand, ankles. Fractures and dislocations of the fingers or toes. Ligament injury

Mild

1

Fractures of the ulna, radius, humerus, tibia, clavicle, scapula, metatarsals, calcaneus, pubis. Simple pelvic fractures. Dislocations of large bones. Extensive wounds of muscles and tendons. Minor wounds (internal tears) of the axillary, brachial, and palmar arteries and veins

Moderate

2

Comminuted pelvic fractures. Femoral fracture. Dislocation in the wrist, ankle, knee, hip joint. Traumatic amputations (up to the knee joint) of the upper extremities. Rupture of knee tendons. Sciatic nerve injury. Minor wounds (internal tears) of the femoral artery. Major wounds, thrombosis of the axillary, popliteal, and femoral arteries and veins

Serious, non-life-threatening

3

Pelvic crush injury. Traumatic amputations above the knee joint. Crush syndrome. Major wounds of the brachial and femoral arteries

Severe, life-threatening

4

Open crush pelvic fractures

Critical with doubtful survival

5

HEAD

Headache, dizziness

Mild

1

Somnolence, responsive to verbal stimuli, unconsciousness <1 hour, simple skull vault fractures

Moderate

2

Unconsciousness for 1–6 hours or <1 hour but with neurological deficit, basilar skull fractures, comminuted complex or depressed vault fractures, brain contusions, subarachnoid hemorrhages

Serious, non-life-threatening

3

Unconsciousness for 1–6 hours with neurological deficit, unconsciousness for 6–24 hours, appropriate responses to pain stimuli only, skull fractures with depression >2 cm, dural or arachnoid tears, intracranial hematoma <100 ml

Severe, life-threatening

4

Loss of consciousness with inappropriate movements, unconsciousness >24 hours, brainstem injuries, intracranial hematoma >100 ml

Critical with doubtful survival

5

NECK

Spinal column strain without fractures or displacements

Mild

1

Thyroid gland contusions, brachial plexus injuries, fractures or displacements of spinous or transverse processes of cervical vertebrae, minor compression fractures <20% of cervical vertebra height

Moderate

2

Internal tears/thrombosis of the internal carotid artery. Laryngeal and pharyngeal contusions, spinal cord contusions, displacements or fractures of vertebral bodies or articular surfaces of cervical vertebrae, compression fractures of >1 vertebra or >20% of the anterior vertebral height

Serious, non-life-threatening

3

Incomplete spinal cord injury, laryngeal crush, internal carotid artery tears/thrombosis with neurological deficit

Severe, life-threatening

4

Complete spinal cord injury at the C4 level and below

Critical with doubtful survival

5

FACE

Corneal abrasions, superficial tongue wounds, nasal fractures or mandibular branch fractures, dental fractures or avulsions, tooth dislocations

Mild

1

Zygomatic bone fractures, orbital fractures, subcondylar mandibular fractures, Le Fort I, scleral or corneal wounds

Moderate

2

Optic nerve injuries, Le Fort II fracture

Serious, non-life-threatening

3

Le Fort III fracture

Severe, life-threatening

4

Critical with doubtful survival

5

CHEST

1st rib fractures, thoracic spine strains, chest contusions, sternal contusions

Mild

1

2nd–3rd rib fractures, sternum fractures, dislocation or fractures of spinous or transverse processes of thoracic vertebrae, minor compression fractures of less than 20% of vertebral height

Moderate

2

Lung contusion/laceration <1 lobe, unilateral hydropneumothorax, diaphragmatic ruptures, fractures of more than 4 ribs, internal tears/minor ruptures/thrombosis of the subclavian or brachiocephalic arteries, mild inhalation burns, dislocations or fractures of vertebral bodies, compression fractures of >1 vertebra or compression fractures of >20% of its vertebral height, spinal cord contusions with transient neurological symptoms

Serious, non-life-threatening

3

Contusions or lacerations of multiple lung lobes, hemopneumomediastinum, bilateral hemopneumothorax, flail chest, myocardial contusions, tension pneumothorax, hemothorax >1000 ml, tracheal fractures, internal aortic tears, major ruptures of the subclavian or brachiocephalic arteries, incomplete spinal cord injury syndrome

Severe, life-threatening

4

Major aortic wounds, cardiac wounds, bronchial and tracheal ruptures, flail chest, inhalation burns requiring mechanical ventilation, multilobar lung lacerations with tension pneumothorax, hemopneumomediastinum, or hemothorax >1000 ml, spinal cord rupture or complete transection

Critical with doubtful survival

5

ABDOMEN

Abrasions, contusions, superficial wounds of the scrotum, vagina, vulva, perineum, lumbar spine strains, hematuria

Mild

1

Contusions, superficial wounds of the stomach, small intestine, urinary bladder, uterus, urethra; mild contusions/wounds of the kidneys, liver, spleen, pancreas; duodenal/colonic contusions; dislocations or fractures of lumbar spinous or transverse processes, minor compression fractures (<20%) of vertebrae, nerve root injury

Moderate

2

Superficial wounds of the duodenum/colon/rectum; perforations of the abdominal cavity/small intestine/bladder/urethra; severe contusions/minor injuries with vascular damage or hydroperitoneum >1000 ml of the kidneys/liver/spleen/pancreas; small tears of the iliac artery or vein; retroperitoneal hematoma; dislocation or fractures of vertebral bodies, compression fractures of >1 vertebra or >20% of its anterior height; spinal cord contusions with transient neurological symptoms

Serious, non-life-threatening

3

Perforation of the stomach/duodenum/colon/rectum; perforations with tissue defect of the stomach/peritoneum/bladder/urethra; extensive liver lacerations, extensive iliac artery or vein lacerations; signs of incomplete spinal cord injury; placental abruption

Severe, life-threatening

4

Major wounds with tissue defects or heavily contaminated wounds of the duodenum/colon/rectum; complicated liver/kidney/spleen/pancreas lacerations; complete spinal cord injury

Critical with doubtful survival

5

INTEGUMENTARY SYSTEM

Abrasions, contusions <25 cm on the face/arm or <50 cm on the body; superficial wounds <5 cm on the face/arm or <10 cm on the body; 1st-degree burn up to 100% of body surface area or 2nd–3rd degree burn <10% of total body surface

Mild

1

Abrasions, contusions >25 cm on the face/arm or >50 cm on the body; superficial wounds >5 cm on the face/arm or >10 cm on the body; 2nd–3rd degree burn 10–19% of total body surface

Moderate

2

2nd–3rd degree burn 20–29% of total body surface

Serious, non-life-threatening

3

2nd–3rd degree burn 30–39% of total body surface

Severe, life-threatening

4

2nd–3rd degree burn 40–89% of total body surface

Critical with doubtful survival

5

The politrauma severity (Injury Severity Scale — ISS) in points is equal to the sum of the squares of the AIS severity scores of the three most severe injuries across the following six body regions <*>:

1. head and neck;

1. face;

2. chest

2. abdomen, retroperitoneal space, and pelvic contents;

3. extremities and pelvic girdle

4. external injuries

<*> Note: the division of body regions according to ISS does not correspond to the AIS division.

Polytrauma severity assessment criteria (Injury Severity Score — ISS) [209]:

  1. mild: less than 17 points;

  2. stable: 17–25 points;

  3. borderline: 26–40 points;

  4. critical: more than 40 points.

Example of ISS politrauma severity calculation:

(continued on next page)

Anatomical region

Type of injury

AIS score

Scores included in calculation

ISS score

Head/neck

Brain contusion

4

4x4

16

Internal carotid artery rupture

3

-

Person

1st-degree burn of the frontal region

1

-

-

Lacerated wound of the ear

1

-

Chest

Fracture of 3rd–4th ribs on the left

2

-

-

Sternal contusion

1

-

Abdomen, retroperitoneal space, and pelvic contents

Retroperitoneal hematoma

3

3x3

9

Kidney contusion, hematuria

2

-

Extremities, pelvic girdle

Fracture of femur

3

3x3

9

Clavicle fracture

2

-

External injuries

Abrasions

1

-

-

Total ISS polytrauma severity score

34

Scales and calculators from this guideline

Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)Assessment of disability after stroke

If you practice in traumatology and orthopedics

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right inside ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer based on the clinical guidelines "Pelvic Ring Injuries" and other active Russian Ministry of Health clinical guidelines with a link to the section, rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines