List of Abbreviations
AGO – antiglaucoma surgery
ALT – alanine aminotransferase
AST – aspartate aminotransferase
VG – secondary glaucoma
IOP – intraocular pressure
AQH – aqueous humor
HIV – human immunodeficiency virus
GON – glaucomatous optic neuropathy
ONH – optic nerve head
CAI – carbonic anhydrase inhibitors
EIA – enzyme immunoassay
CME – cystoid macular edema
LI – laser iridotomy/iridectomy
Med – medication
ICD-10 – International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision
INN – International Nonproprietary Name
NVG – neovascular glaucoma
NRR – neuroretinal rim
OCT – optical coherence tomography (optical examination of the optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer using a computerized analyzer)
PGA – prostaglandin analogues
PDR – proliferative diabetic retinopathy
VF – visual field
PRP – panretinal laser photocoagulation
POAG – primary open-angle glaucoma
PERG – pattern electroretinogram
SAP – standard automated perimetry
RNFL – retinal nerve fiber layer
ESR – erythrocyte sedimentation rate
UG – uveal glaucoma
US – ultrasound examination
ACA – anterior chamber angle
PhG – phacogenic glaucoma
PhG – phlebohypertensive glaucoma
EGD – esophagogastroduodenoscopy
PCC – phacoemulsification of cataract
COPD – chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
CRV – central retinal vein
CRV – central retinal vein
CCT – central corneal thickness
C/D – cup-to-disc ratio (ratio of the maximum cup diameter to the optic disc diameter)
ECG – electrocardiography
Echocardiography – echocardiography of the heart
HBsAg – hepatitis B surface antigen
HCV – hepatitis C virus
IL-1 – interleukin 1
ISNT (inferior, superior, nasal, temporal) – rule for ophthalmoscopic assessment of the neuroretinal rim in glaucoma diagnosis
MD – mean deviation (Humphrey scale)
PSD – pattern standard deviation
Pt – tonometry reading when measuring IOP with a contact Maklakov tonometer using a 10 g weight
Po – true intraocular pressure level
TGF-β – transforming growth factor beta
VEGF – vascular endothelial growth factor
Terms and Definitions
Ocular biomicroscopy is an in vivo visual examination method of the optical media and ocular tissues based on creating contrast between illuminated and non-illuminated areas, performed using a slit lamp and additional diagnostic lenses (specifically, for fundus biomicroscopy).
Intraocular pressure – the pressure of the fluid inside the eye resulting from the balance between aqueous humor production, trabecular and uveoscleral outflow, and episcleral venous pressure; it maintains the shape of the eye, ensures a constant supply of circulating nutrients, and provides normal trophism of intraocular tissues.
Glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) – acquired optic nerve pathology characterized by progressive loss of retinal ganglion cells and their axons, leading to structural and functional damage to the optic nerve, visual impairment, and blindness.
Gonioscopy – a method of visual examination (inspection) of the iridocorneal angle (ICA) performed using a slit lamp and a goniolens (gonioscope).
Optic disc – the site where retinal ganglion cell axons exit the eyeball.
Neuroretinal rim (NRR) ‒ the area between the margin of the optic disc and the edge of the cup where the majority of retinal ganglion cell axons are projected.
Normal (a), moderately elevated (b), high (c) IOP – levels of IOP elevation according to the glaucoma classification.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) ‒ a non-invasive, non-contact method for in vivo visualization, qualitative and quantitative analysis of the morphological features of fundus structures, based on the principle of light interferometry.
Ocular hypertension – elevated IOP in the absence of characteristic glaucomatous changes in the optic disc, retinal nerve fiber layer, and visual field defects.
Ophthalmoscopy – an instrumental method for examining the fundus and its structures.
Tonometry – an instrumental method for measuring IOP level, the value of which is determined by analyzing eye deformation data caused by a tonometer and expressed in millimeters of mercury (mmHg).
Perimetry – a method for examining the visual field.
Visual field – the totality of points in space simultaneously visible by the eye with a fixed gaze.
Refractory glaucoma – a form of the disease characterized by a severe, stubborn course, persistence, and often resistance to standard treatment methods.
Scotoma – a visual field defect not connected to the peripheral boundaries.
Retinal nerve fiber layer – the retinal layer formed by the axons of retinal ganglion cells.
Stabilized and unstabilized glaucoma – terms denoting the absence or presence of negative dynamics in the condition of the optic disc and visual field of the patient during follow-up examinations. When assessing the dynamics of the glaucomatous process, the level of IOP and its compliance with the “target” value are also taken into account.
Standard automated perimetry – threshold static perimetry evaluating the central visual field using a white stimulus on a white background.
Iridocorneal angle – the space between the corneoscleral region and the anterior surface of the iris.
Phacodonesis – “trembling” of the lens during eye movement caused by the rupture of some fibers of the suspensory ligament (zonules of Zinn).
“Target” intraocular pressure – the maximum acceptable pressure at which glaucoma progresses slowly enough that vision-related quality of life remains reasonably stable over subsequent years.
Electrophysiological studies – methods for examining the function of the optic nerve, retina, and visual cortex of the brain.
MD, mean deviation – a perimetric index determined during static perimetry, representing the average difference between age-corrected normal retinal light sensitivity values and
PSD, pattern standard deviation – a perimetric index characterizing the severity of localized visual field defects.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Secondary glaucomas (SG) – a term combining a group of progressive optic neuropathies in which the elevation of intraocular pressure is secondary to an underlying disease.
SGs result from eye injuries, ophthalmic conditions, and systemic diseases. The pathogenetic mechanisms of the glaucomatous process depend on the course of the underlying disease causing the glaucoma. Unlike primary glaucoma, the process is not always bilateral. Depending on the nature of the iridocorneal angle block, it can clinically present as open-angle or angle-closure [1, 2].
SGs include six main clinico-pathogenetic forms: inflammatory, neovascular, phlebohypertensive, phacogenic, drug-induced, and post-traumatic. Depending on the form of SG, approaches to diagnosis, medical therapy, and surgical treatment will correspondingly differ [3, 2].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
1.1.1. Etiology and pathogenesis of inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma
Inflammatory or uveal glaucoma (UG) develops during or after inflammation in keratitis, recurrent episcleritis, scleritis, and uveitis.
Intraocular pressure elevation may be caused by impaired aqueous humor outflow due to the effect of inflammatory cells, cytokines, iris pigment, corticosteroids from ongoing therapy on the trabecular meshwork, as well as closure of the iridocorneal angle (ICA) by peripheral anterior synechiae and/or ICA closure due to pupillary block.
Factors affecting intraocular pressure (IOP) [4-7]:
1. Reduced trabecular outflow:
- pro-inflammatory effects of cytokines IL-1, TGF-β on trabecular meshwork cells;
- trabeculitis (trabecular edema, accumulation of fibrin and inflammatory cells in outflow channels);
- deposition of pigment and pro-inflammatory cells in the trabecular meshwork;
- high viscosity of aqueous humor due to elevated protein levels;
- trabeculopathy secondary to steroid therapy;
2. Closure of the iridocorneal angle:
- blockade by peripheral anterior synechiae;
- due to pupillary block;
- neovascularization;
1.1.2. Etiology and pathogenesis of neovascular glaucoma
Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) develops as a result of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) due to the blockade of anterior chamber angle structures by newly formed vessels and a fibrovascular membrane [134].
Retinal ischemia induces the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which triggers neovascularization processes in the posterior segment of the eye, as well as the release of VEGF from the non-pigmented epithelium of the ciliary body, causing the formation of new blood vessels in the anterior segment of the eye. Histologically, newly formed vessels are found on the surface of the iris and rarely in its stroma. They are formed by the sprouting of endothelial cells from capillaries, originating from vessels above the iris root or from the major arterial circle of the iris. They can block the trabecular meshwork zone by positioning themselves perpendicularly over it, which distinguishes them from the iris's own vessels that run along the iris root. The fibrovascular membrane consists of myofibroblasts and proliferating smooth muscle tissue and can extend onto the surface of the iris and the anterior chamber angle. Together with the supporting fibrovascular membrane, the vessels block the trabecular meshwork, contributing to the formation of peripheral anterior synechiae with secondary closure of the anterior chamber angle [135, 134].
Nosologies accompanied by the development of NVG [1]:
- central retinal vein occlusion;
- proliferative diabetic retinopathy;
- ocular ischemic syndrome in chronic carotid artery obstruction;
- central retinal artery occlusion;
- choroidal melanomas, uveal melanoma, and retinoblastoma [136-138];
Cases of NVG have been described in lymphoma with metastases in the ciliary body [139], Fanconi anemia [140], cryoglobulinemia [141], and sarcoidosis [142].
1.1.3. Etiology and pathogenesis of phlebotensive glaucoma
Phlebohypertensive glaucoma (PHG) develops as a result of impaired aqueous humor outflow due to elevated venous pressure in the vessels draining blood from the eyeball [2]. Episodic pressure elevation in episcleral veins does not reduce aqueous humor outflow and does not cause an increase in intraocular pressure. However, with chronically elevated episcleral venous pressure, outflow deterioration is possible, leading to the development of ocular hypertension and glaucoma-type optic neuropathy [1].
Nosologies accompanied by the development of PHG [1, 2]:
Venous compression/obstruction:
- thyroid eye disease;
- superior vena cava syndrome;
- retrobulbar tumors;
- cavernous sinus thrombosis.
Arteriovenous disorders:
- carotid-cavernous fistula;
- orbital varices.
Idiopathic dilation of episcleral veins
Thyroid eye disease is an organ-specific progressive disorder of the soft tissues of the orbit and eye, developing against the background of autoimmune thyroid pathology. It arises as a result of orbital tissue infiltration, including extraocular muscles, by lymphocytes, mast cells, and plasma cells. Elevated episcleral venous pressure may be observed in severe cases due to venous outflow obstruction [167]. Superior vena cava syndrome (cava syndrome) is a symptom complex developing as a result of circulatory disorders in the superior vena cava system and impaired venous blood drainage from the upper parts of the body. Other conditions associated with venous outflow obstruction and elevated episcleral venous pressure include local amyloidosis, retrobulbar tumors, and cavernous sinus thrombosis.
Carotid-cavernous fistulas are the most common cause of PHG and are classified into traumatic and spontaneous [168]. Traumatic fistulas are characterized by the formation of a high-flow communication between the internal carotid artery and the surrounding venous plexus of the cavernous sinus. The spontaneous type is more common in middle-aged and elderly women, representing small low-flow connections between the cavernous sinus and meningeal branches of the carotid arteries. The mixing of arterial and venous blood lowers arterial pressure and increases episcleral venous pressure [169].
Proposed mechanisms of idiopathic episcleral vein dilation include the existence of direct anastomoses between the arterial and venous systems in the anterior sclera, local venous obstruction in the area of extrabulbar muscles, and familial predisposition [1, 170].
1.1.4. Etiology and pathogenesis of phacogenic glaucoma
Phacogenic glaucomas refer to a group of ophthalmological nosologies associated with secondary IOP elevation due to changes in the shape, position, or integrity of the lens. Accordingly, phacotopic, phacomorphic, and phacolytic glaucomas are distinguished. Given the differences in etiology and treatment approaches, each form will be considered separately.
1.1.4.1. Etiology and pathogenesis of phacotopic glaucoma
Phacotopic glaucoma develops as a result of lens subluxation or dislocation in pseudoexfoliation syndrome or blunt eye trauma into the vitreous cavity or anterior chamber; in the latter case, it proceeds as angle-closure glaucoma. With rarer anterior displacement of the lens, pupillary block may develop with subsequent closure of the anterior chamber angle. With posterior lens dislocation, vitreous prolapse may occur, which can also lead to pupillary block [1, 173-176].
1.1.4.2. Etiology and pathogenesis of phacomorphic glaucoma
Phacomorphic glaucoma develops as a result of lens enlargement due to hydration and swelling of lens fibers in age-related or traumatic cataracts, or drug idiosyncrasy. In rare cases, lens swelling has been described as an idiosyncratic reaction to sulfonamides, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, diuretics, acetylsalicylic acid, etc. The equatorial zone, regulated by the zonular apparatus, allows the lens to move forward and, together with the increase in anteroposterior dimension, creates a risk of iridolenticular contact, potential pupillary block, and iris bombe. A key risk factor is short hyperopic eyes. A complex clinical combination of phacomorphic glaucoma and angle-closure glaucoma arises, with difficult differentiation between these conditions. With lens enlargement, there is a possibility of developing a pupillary block, and with a narrow anterior chamber angle, an acute/subacute attack of secondary angle-closure glaucoma [173-175, 179, 180, 176].
1.1.4.3. Etiology and pathogenesis of phacolytic glaucoma
Phacolytic glaucoma develops as a result of a toxic-inflammatory reaction of ocular tissues to various lens components and includes three mechanisms that may develop separately or simultaneously: phacolytic, phacoanaphylactic (phacoantigenic), and phacofragmentary [189-196].
The phacolytic mechanism of IOP elevation consists of the imbibition of the trabecular meshwork by high-molecular-weight lens proteins and macrophages that leak through an intact capsule into the aqueous humor in hypermature cataracts [189, 190, 193, 194, 196].
Phacoanaphylactic (phacoantigenic) uveitis is a rare, severe granulomatous uveitis that develops after traumatic or surgical destruction of the lens as a result of immune complex formation following sensitization to lens proteins and loss of normal tolerance to these lens proteins [191, 197, 193, 198].
The phacofragmentary mechanism consists of the blockade of trabecular outflow by cortical and/or capsular lens material during phacoemulsification, penetrating eye trauma, or laser capsulotomy [199-202].
1.1.5. Etiology and pathogenesis of drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma
Systemic and topical corticosteroids (S01BA) have a pathological effect on the trabecular meshwork, causing microstructural changes in the trabeculae, initiating the deposition of extracellular material (glycosaminoglycan, elastin, and fibronectin), and inhibiting protease and phagocytic activity. In addition, trabecular meshwork cultures treated with dexamethasone** in experiments demonstrate decreased levels of tissue plasminogen activator, stromelysin, and metalloproteinases, as well as reduced arachidonic acid metabolism and phagocytic activity. These changes lead to an increased accumulation of cellular metabolic products in the trabecular tissue. The ultimate effect is a decrease in the aqueous humor outflow rate with the development of ocular hypertension [1, 207-209].
Glucocorticoids bind to several receptors throughout the body, including the glucocorticoid receptor alpha (GRalpha) and glucocorticoid receptor beta (GRbeta), which are ligand-activated transcription factors. GRbeta is thought to play a role in steroid resistance and has been shown to block the glucocorticoid response in trabecular cells, thereby suppressing phagocytic activity. This can lead to increased deposition of material, such as debris and pigment, in the juxtacanalicular meshwork in steroid-induced glaucoma.
Risk factors for steroid-induced ocular hypertension/glaucoma [210-212, 207, 213]:
- primary open-angle glaucoma
- glaucoma suspect
- family history of glaucoma in parents
- advanced age
- systemic connective tissue pathology
- high myopia
- type 1 diabetes mellitus
- genetic predisposition to steroid-induced ocular hypertension
Approximately one-third of patients receiving topical corticosteroids (S01BA) experience an IOP elevation of 6–15 mm Hg, and the percentage of such patients correlates with the duration of steroid therapy [214]. The development and severity of the hypertensive effect are influenced by the type and potency of the corticosteroid, the frequency, and the route of administration. The higher the potency of the corticosteroid, the greater the risk of IOP elevation. For example, dexamethasone** and prednisolone** are more potent steroids and raise IOP more frequently than less potent steroids such as fluorometholone and hydrocortisone** [215]. IOP elevation is more common with topical administration than with systemic administration and typically occurs within 1 to 4 weeks. Following cessation of steroid therapy, IOP normalization most commonly occurs within 1 to 4 weeks as well. Subconjunctival, sub-Tenon's, and retrobulbar corticosteroid injections (S01BA) can also cause IOP elevation. The proportion of patients who develop ocular hypertension from periocular corticosteroids (S01BA) is significantly higher than from topical ophthalmic corticosteroids (S01BA). IOP elevation following periocular administration of sustained-release corticosteroids (S01BA) usually occurs after several months, although in some cases it may be observed within a week and may return to baseline at six to nine months post-injection. In cases of significant IOP elevation following periocular corticosteroid administration (S01BA), excision of the corticosteroid depot may be required.
In approximately half of the patients who received systemic corticosteroids (triamcinolone) intravitreally, IOP elevation developed within two to four weeks post-injection. In pseudophakic eyes or those that have undergone anterior vitrectomy, IOP elevation may occur more rapidly.
1.1.6. Etiology and pathogenesis of post-traumatic glaucoma
Post-traumatic glaucomas represent a heterogeneous group of conditions resulting from multiple pathophysiological mechanisms that elevate IOP in the early or late stages following blunt or penetrating eye trauma.
Eye trauma accounts for 2–6% of annual hospital admissions for trauma patients [222, 223]. The risk of developing glaucoma after blunt trauma is approximately 19%, and after a penetrating injury, about 3% [224, 225]. Approximately 60% of patients with eye trauma are under 30 years of age [226]. The gender ratio ranges from 3 to 14 males to 1 female [227, 228, 226]. The causes and circumstances of eye trauma can vary widely depending on geographical, socioeconomic, and cultural factors. While in the past the majority of eye injuries occurred in the workplace or in violent conflict settings, in recent years there has been an increase in eye injuries resulting from leisure activities and motor vehicle accidents [229, 226].
1.1.6.1. Etiology and pathogenesis of early-onset post-traumatic glaucoma following blunt eye trauma
The cause of a closed globe injury is the direct impact of a large-area, high-kinetic-energy object on the eye, or the effect of a blast wave and/or concussion of individual body parts. The pathogenesis of closed globe injury is complex, diverse, and comprises several stages: tissue alteration, impaired neurovascular regulation, changes in biochemical parameters within the ocular fluid media, and the development of a general and local adaptation syndrome (stress response).
The impact of a blunt object leads to structural changes in the anterior segment of the eyeball, which compresses along the anteroposterior axis with an equatorial expansion, during which expansion and deformation of seven annular structures (according to D. Campbell, 1991) occur [230]:
- pupillary sphincter – deformation/rupture;
- iris root – iridodialysis;
- anterior part of the ciliary body – rupture between the longitudinal and circular muscles of the ciliary body;
- site of attachment of the ciliary body to the scleral spur – cyclodialysis;
- trabecular meshwork – rupture of the anterior part of the network;
- zonule fibers – subluxation/dislocation of the lens;
- site of attachment of the retina to the ora serrata – retinal detachment.
The conditions described can lead to acute or chronic IOP elevation [224].
In the early post-traumatic period, a slight decrease in IOP may be noted as a result of inflammatory processes, reduced aqueous humor production, and structural disorders in the iridocorneal angle with increased aqueous humor outflow. In some cases, IOP may be elevated due to blockage of the trabecular meshwork by erythrocytes, inflammatory cells, and cell breakdown products. In such cases, IOP normalizes within a few days or weeks.
Hemorrhage from the ciliary body vessels usually stops spontaneously as a result of IOP elevation, vasospasm, and thrombus formation. Final clot organization occurs on days 4 to 7. Uncomplicated hyphemas resolve within 1 week. Evaluating the grade of hyphema is important: Grade I – filling of the anterior chamber by less than one-third, Grade II – from one-third to half, Grade III – from half to nearly complete filling, Grade IV – complete filling of the anterior chamber with blood. The risk of developing glaucoma depends on the grade, duration of elevated IOP, and rebleeding. In the presence of hyphema, the probability of post-traumatic glaucoma is 13% with Grade II hyphema, 27% with Grade III hyphema, and 52% with total hyphema [231].
A hyphema up to 3 mm in height typically does not cause vision loss or increased tonometry. Hyphemas greater than 3 mm can significantly reduce vision due to pupillary blockage and lead to a significant IOP elevation (up to an acute attack) due to mechanical blockage of the iridocorneal angle. In addition, the hyphema may obscure the iridocorneal area of dialysis. Total hyphema filling the entire anterior chamber, in addition to vision loss and tonometry disturbances, may eventually lead to bloodstaining of the cornea – persistent corneal opacity due to infiltration of its stroma by formed blood elements. Preventing this complication is an important treatment objective, for which both conservative treatment (primarily enzymolysis) and surgical treatment (anterior chamber paracentesis, blood aspiration, anterior chamber tamponade with air or ophthalmic viscoelastic) can be used.
Inflammation is one of the primary responses to trauma and can cause IOP elevation both as a result of trabecular obstruction by inflammatory cells and cell breakdown products, and inflammation of the trabecular meshwork itself [224]. The severity of the inflammatory reaction depends on the extent of damage and ranges from asymptomatic iritis to severe uveitis with the deposition of precipitates in the anterior chamber and the formation of goniosynechiae.
1.1.6.2. Etiology and pathogenesis of late-onset post-traumatic glaucoma following blunt eye trauma
The development of late-onset post-traumatic glaucoma occurs as a result of iridocorneal angle recession, functional blockade of the trabecular meshwork by degenerated erythrocytes and/or hemolysis products, as well as lens dislocation and disruption of its integrity.
The cause of post-traumatic glaucoma associated with iridocorneal angle recession is the formation of micro-tears between the longitudinal and circular muscle portions of the ciliary body, triggering delayed inflammation and degeneration of the aqueous humor outflow zone. Post-traumatic glaucoma associated with angle recession can develop several years after the trauma. It is believed that glaucoma develops in 7–9% of patients with angle recession [244–246, 233].
Ghost cell glaucoma, described by D. Campbell, develops several weeks after trauma and is caused by the imbibition of the trabecular meshwork by degenerated erythrocytes (ghost cells). Young, elastic erythrocytes are normally capable of passing through the trabecular meshwork, whereas stiffer, aging erythrocytes are unable to pass into Schlemm's canal, leading to IOP elevation. This form of glaucoma occurs in the presence of long-standing hyphema/vitreous hemorrhage [247–255].
Hemolytic glaucoma develops several days or weeks after intraocular hemorrhage due to functional blockade of the trabecular meshwork by hemoglobin-engorged macrophages, free hemoglobin, and remnants of lysed erythrocytes.
Hemosiderotic glaucoma is a rare condition associated with a history of prolonged intraocular hemorrhage, leading to erythrocyte degeneration and the release of their contained hemoglobin, which can also cause retinal degeneration, cataract, iris discoloration, and corneal staining. Hemoglobin released from lysed erythrocytes is cleared from the eye by macrophages as free hemoglobin or its breakdown products – globin, bilirubin, and iron, which is taken up by the endothelial cells of the trabecular meshwork. Toxic inorganic iron granules accumulate inside the cells, causing hemosiderosis accompanied by sclerosis and obliteration of the intertrabecular spaces [256–258].
Blunt trauma to the eyeball can cause a number of post-traumatic glaucomas associated with lens pathology, the etiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of which are described in subsection 1.6.6.2:
- rupture of the zonule of Zinn fibers with lens subluxation and dislocation – phacotopic glaucoma;
- rupture of the lens capsule and/or lens fibers with hydration and lens enlargement followed by angle-closure – phacomorphic glaucoma;
- rupture of the lens capsule with release of its particles into the anterior chamber cavity – phacolytic glaucoma;
- rupture of the lens capsule with the development of an immunological reaction to the lens protein – phacoanaphylactic glaucoma.
1.1.6.3. Etiology and pathogenesis of post-traumatic glaucoma due to open globe injury
Penetrating injuries of the eyeball can be caused by blunt or sharp objects. The most common cause of post-traumatic glaucoma with a penetrating eye injury is secondary angle closure due to peripheral goniosynechiae following a prolonged flattening of the anterior chamber against the background of an inflammatory process. Another cause is the formation of posterior synechiae due to inflammation and pupillary block, which leads to iris bombe with secondary angle closure. The development of the previously described phacomorphic, phacolytic, and ghost cell glaucomas is also possible. In the presence of a metallic foreign body (iron, copper), secondary glaucoma may develop due to the toxic effect of metal oxides on the trabecular meshwork (siderosis, chalcosis) [262, 263, 225, 264, 233].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
1.1.1. Epidemiology of inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma
The prevalence of glaucoma in inflammatory diseases of the eyeball ranges from 10% to 20% [8-10, 109]. An important factor influencing this is the duration of the inflammatory pathology: the incidence of glaucoma in uveitis after 1 and 5 years is 6% and 11%, respectively, increasing to 22% after 10 years [11]. The prevalence of inflammatory glaucoma correlates with age, as well as with the etiology and clinical course of the inflammatory process. It is believed that uveitis is less common in very young and elderly individuals, but these very groups are more prone to IOP elevation [12, 13]. Among patients with uveitis older than 60 years, the increase in intraocular pressure can reach up to 30% [14]. Other factors, such as the chronic course of uveitis and predominant involvement of the anterior segment, also contribute to an increased risk of the ocular hypertension symptom [11, 15].
1.1.2. Epidemiology of neovascular glaucoma
The prevalence of neovascular glaucoma is approximately 3.9%, although exact data on overall incidence and prevalence are lacking [143]. The most common conditions associated with neovascular glaucoma are central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR), and a number of other conditions including ocular ischemic syndrome and tumors. Approximately 36% of neovascular glaucoma cases occur after CRVO, 32% in PDR, and 13% after carotid artery obstruction [144, 145]. Considering retinal ischemia as the leading etiological component, neovascular glaucoma is more prevalent in elderly patients with significant cardiovascular risk factors such as a history of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking.
Unlike CRVO, in which typical neovascular glaucoma occurs within 3 months of the onset of ischemic occlusion (the so-called "100-day glaucoma"), the development of hypoxia and ischemia in diabetic retinopathy occurs relatively slowly. The main factors causing vascular complications in diabetes mellitus are chronic hyperglycemia and ischemia-reperfusion, the production of large amounts of neovascular factors, and an imbalance between pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic processes. Under conditions of hypoxia and ischemia, this balance is disrupted, shifting towards unbalanced VEGF activation, accompanied by the activation, proliferation, and migration of endothelial cells, perocytes, and immune cells, which stimulates angiogenesis and promotes the formation of a neovascular network and neovascular membranes on the fundus, iris, and in the anterior chamber angle.
1.1.3. Epidemiology of phlebotensive glaucoma
Elevated episcleral venous pressure is an important cause of ocular hypertension and secondary glaucoma. The most common conditions associated with phlebohypertensive glaucoma are venous compression, arteriovenous shunts/malformations, and idiopathic dilation of episcleral veins. The prevalence of this form of glaucoma is considered low due to the rare occurrence of these systemic nosologies [270].
1.1.4. Epidemiology of phacogenic glaucomas
The epidemiology of phacogenic glaucomas differs between developed and developing countries. In developing countries with more limited healthcare resources and a high percentage of cataracts, the incidence of phacogenic glaucomas is up to 2.4% at the presentation of senile cataract, with a female predominance [269].
1.1.5. Epidemiology of drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma
Ocular hypertension has been described during local, periocular, intraocular, and inhalation corticosteroid therapy. Approximately one-third of patients treated with topical steroids experience a 6–15 mmHg increase in IOP, and the percentage of patients with steroid-induced ocular hypertension continues to increase with the duration of steroid therapy [214].
1.1.6. Epidemiology of post-traumatic glaucoma
The prevalence of eye trauma is 19.8% [223]. Among hospitalized trauma patients, eye injury is recorded in 2–6%, with blunt trauma being the most common [222]. The risk of developing glaucoma after blunt trauma, particularly closed globe contusion, is 19% [224]. The corresponding risk in penetrating eye injury is about 3% [225].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
H40.3 Secondary post-traumatic glaucoma
H40.4 Secondary glaucoma secondary to eye inflammation
H40.5 Secondary glaucoma secondary to other eye disorders
H40.8 Other glaucoma
H40.9 Unspecified glaucoma
H42.8 Glaucoma in other diseases classified elsewhere
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
1.5.1. Classification of inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma
Inflammatory glaucoma, as a chronic progressive optic neuropathy, meets the classical classification criteria characteristic of primary open-angle glaucoma.
Depending on the IOP level, inflammatory glaucoma is subdivided into:
Table 1 – Classification scheme of IOP levels in glaucoma [2, 16]
IOP level | Tonometric IOP, Pt (mmHg) | True IOP, P0 (mmHg) |
Normal (A) | ≤25,0 | ≤ 21,0 |
Moderately elevated (B) | 26-32 | 22-28 |
High (C) | ≥33 | ≥29 |
Depending on the clinical course and characteristics, inflammatory glaucoma is subdivided into:
Table 2 – Classification scheme of glaucoma by clinical course [16]
Glaucoma course | Clinical characteristic |
Stabilized | No negative dynamics in optic disc and visual field status during prolonged patient follow-up (at least 6 months) |
Unstable | Negative dynamics of structural (optic disc, retinal nerve fibers) and functional (visual field) parameters recorded on repeat examinations |
When assessing the dynamics of the glaucomatous process, the level of IOP and its compliance with "target" values are also taken into account.
Depending on the severity of the pathological process, inflammatory glaucoma is subdivided into:
Table 4 – Classification scheme of glaucoma stages [16]
Stages | Features | |
Visual field | Optic nerve head | |
I initial | Normal VF boundaries, minor changes (scotomas) in the paracentral areas of the VF (small paracentral scotomas, relative scotoma in Bjerrum's area) | Asymmetry of excavation between the two eyes, vertically oval excavation shape, enlarged excavation that does not reach the OD margin |
II moderate | Constriction of VF boundaries on the nasal side by more than 10° or confluence of small paracentral scotomas into an arcuate scotoma | OD excavation is enlarged, marginal excavation of the OD appears |
III advanced | The VF boundary on the nasal side (или concentrically) is less than 15° from the fixation point. This stage also includes cases with a preserved peripheral VF area and absent central vision | Marginal subtotal OD excavation |
IV terminal | Loss of object vision | Total excavation |
The division of the continuous glaucomatous process into 4 (four) stages is conventional. The status of the visual field and optic nerve head is taken into account when determining the stage.
In glaucoma developing as a result of secondary ocular hypertension against the background of an inflammatory process, diagnostic difficulties are associated with the inconstant nature of IOP elevation during exacerbations of inflammation, as well as reduced transparency of the optical media, which hinders functional testing and visualization of fundus structures. In such cases, the diagnosis of glaucoma may be established without additional examinations, and the stage of glaucoma optic neuropathy is not specified [1, 17].
1.5.2. Classification of neovascular glaucoma
Neovascular glaucoma, as a chronic progressive optic neuropathy, meets the classification criteria characteristic of primary open-angle glaucoma.
Depending on the IOP level, neovascular glaucoma is subdivided into:
Table 1 – Classification scheme of IOP levels in glaucoma [2, 16]
IOP level | Tonometric IOP, Pt (mmHg) | True IOP, P0 (mmHg) |
Normal (A) | ≤25,0 | ≤21,0 |
Moderately elevated (B) | 26-32 | 22-28 |
High (C) | ≥33 | ≥29 |
Depending on the clinical course and characteristics, neovascular glaucoma is subdivided into
Table 2 – Classification scheme of glaucoma by clinical course [16]
Glaucoma course | Clinical characteristic |
Stabilized | No negative dynamics in optic disc and visual field status during prolonged patient follow-up (at least 6 months) |
Unstable | Negative dynamics of structural (optic disc, retinal nerve fibers) and functional (visual field) parameters recorded on repeat examinations |
When assessing the dynamics of the glaucomatous process, the level of IOP and its compliance with "target" values are also taken into account.
Depending on the severity of the pathological process, neovascular glaucoma is subdivided into:
Table 4 – Classification scheme of glaucoma stages [16]
Stages | Features | |
Visual field | Optic nerve head | |
I initial | Normal VF boundaries, minor changes (scotomas) in the paracentral areas of the VF (small paracentral scotomas, relative scotoma in Bjerrum's area) | Asymmetry of excavation between the two eyes, vertically oval excavation shape, enlarged excavation that does not reach the OD margin |
II moderate | Constriction of VF boundaries on the nasal side by more than 10° or confluence of small paracentral scotomas into an arcuate scotoma | OD excavation is enlarged, marginal excavation of the OD appears |
III advanced | The VF boundary on the nasal side (или concentrically) is less than 15° from the fixation point. This stage also includes cases with a preserved peripheral VF area and absent central vision | Marginal subtotal OD excavation |
IV terminal | Loss of object vision | Total excavation |
The division of the continuous glaucomatous process into 4 (four) stages is conventional. The status of the visual field and optic nerve head is taken into account when determining the stage.
1.5.3. Classification of phlebohypertensive glaucoma
Phacogenic glaucoma, as a chronic progressive optic neuropathy, meets all classification criteria characteristic of glaucoma, including stage and level of IOP compensation (see section 3.3).
1.5.4. Classification of phacogenic glaucomas
1.5.4.1. Phacotopic glaucoma
1.5.4.2. Phacomorphic glaucoma
1.5.4.3. Phacolytic glaucoma
1.5.5. Classification of drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma
Steroid glaucoma, as a chronic progressive optic neuropathy, meets all classification criteria characteristic of glaucoma, including stage and level of IOP compensation (see section 3.3) [1, 216].
1.5.6. Classification of post-traumatic glaucomas
1.5.6.1. Early-onset post-traumatic glaucoma due to blunt ocular trauma
1.5.6.2. Late-onset post-traumatic glaucoma due to blunt ocular trauma
1.5.6.3. Post-traumatic glaucoma due to open ocular trauma
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
1.6.1. Clinical presentation of inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma
Changes in intraocular pressure associated with inflammation can range from hypotony to hypertension. The elevation of IOP in uveitis differs from IOP elevation in other diseases in that it may be short-term in some patients and chronic in others. Increased IOP is observed during an acute episode of uveitis, against the background of a chronic, sluggish inflammatory process, or in the long-term period due to steroid therapy. Glaucomatous optic neuropathy can develop either due to chronic IOP elevation or due to a high frequency of recurring short-term episodes of ocular hypertension [18, 19, 1, 14].
Clinical manifestations of the underlying disease (uveitis) depend on the localization of inflammation, morphological characteristics, degree of activity, course, as well as the clinical form of the systemic disease [20].
Patients may complain of blurred or decreased vision, and floaters in front of the eye. In acute inflammation, they may report eye redness, photophobia, lacrimation, eye pain, changes in iris color, and pupil size and shape. In intermediate and posterior uveitis, complaints may include flashes, visual field defects, micro- and macropsia, distorted vision, and color vision impairment.
The clinical manifestations of the underlying inflammatory process are characterized by pericorneal/mixed injection, endothelial "fogging", and precipitates on the posterior surface of the cornea (small "dust-like" in non-granulomatous inflammation, medium and large "mutton-fat" in granulomatous inflammation). As the inflammatory process subsides, the precipitates decrease in diameter, acquire clear margins, undergo pigment deposition, or resorb [20, 21]. Attention should also be paid to exudative cellular effusion into the anterior chamber, hypopyon, hyphema, and changes in the iris (stromal edema, dilation of its own vessels, and the development of newly formed vessels). In granulomatous inflammation, Koeppe nodules (at the pupillary margin) and Busacca nodules (in the mid-zone of the iris and the anterior chamber angle) may form [22-24]. Formation of anterior synechiae in the iridocorneal angle (during the organization of fibrinous exudate) and posterior synechiae between the iris and the lens is possible, up to seclusion of the pupil with the formation of a pupillary membrane. Cellular and exudative reactions may appear in the anterior vitreous (in patients with iridocyclitis), along with the development of macular edema and/or papillitis.
The incidence and structure of uveitis complications depend on the localization of the inflammatory process, the etiological form, the duration and severity of uveitis, and the adequacy of diagnosis and treatment. It should be borne in mind that, in addition to secondary glaucoma, complications of uveitis also include scleral and corneal perforation, secondary keratopathies, complicated cataract, vitreous fibrosis, retinal vessel and/or optic disc occlusion, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, optic disc atrophy, ischemic neuropathy and maculopathy, epiretinal membrane, retinal detachment (rhegmatogenous, tractional, exudative), retinoschisis, as well as persistent hypotony and subatrophy of the eyeball [23-26, 20, 27].
1.6.2. Clinical presentation of neovascular glaucoma
Depending on the degree of IOP elevation, the stage of glaucomatous optic neuropathy, and the volume and localization of neovascularization, the symptoms of neovascular glaucoma include decreased vision, corneal edema, photophobia, conjunctival injection, rubeosis, hyphema, and hemophthalmos. With significant ocular hypertension, the patient may experience pain in the eyeball, headache, nausea, and/or vomiting.
The clinical presentation of neovascular glaucoma is divided into three consecutive stages:
1. rubeosis of the iris;
2. stage of open-angle glaucoma;
3. stage of angle-closure glaucoma.
At the rubeosis stage, newly formed vessels are visualized at the pupillary margin and/or in the iridocorneal angle. As a rule, primary neovascularization develops in the pupillary area; however, in some cases, rubeosis may debut in the iridocorneal angle. Intraocular pressure may be normal or moderately elevated. At this stage, patients usually have no pronounced complaints, except for those related to the underlying disease (hyphema in proliferative diabetic retinopathy, visual field defects in central retinal vein occlusion).
At the open-angle glaucoma stage, IOP is decompensated, and rubeosis is clearly visualized in the pupillary zone as well as in the iridocorneal angle; hyphema is noted in some cases.
At the angle-closure glaucoma stage, the contraction of the fibrovascular membrane causes progressive closure of the iridocorneal angle and the formation of goniosynechiae. Patients often complain of photophobia, decreased visual acuity, severe eye pain, headache, nausea, and/or vomiting. Rubeosis is significantly pronounced, the pupil is rigid, ectropion is present, hyphema, moderate inflammation, and IOP up to 60–70 mm Hg are possible. Conjunctival injection and diffuse hypertensive corneal edema are frequently observed.
1.6.3. Clinical presentation of phlebohypertensive glaucoma
The biomicroscopic picture of elevated episcleral venous pressure glaucoma is characterized by pronounced dilation and tortuosity of episcleral veins, an open iridocorneal angle profile with blood filling Schlemm's canal, and increased IOP with an increased ocular pulse amplitude. In the early stage of the disease, the elevation of IOP is often combined with a normal outflow facility coefficient, but with chronic elevation of venous pressure, outflow may decrease and fail to recover even after normalization of venous pressure.
With significant increases in venous pressure, conjunctival chemosis, pulsating exophthalmos, and restriction of extraocular motility are noted.
1.6.4. Clinical presentation of phacogenic glaucomas
1.6.4.1. Clinical presentation of phacotopic glaucoma
Lens subluxation is characterized by decreased visual acuity, acquired myopia, asymmetry of the anterior chamber depth, episodic or constant elevation of intraocular pressure, a closed iridocorneal angle upon gonioscopy, phakodonesis, and partial displacement of the lens relative to the optical axis of the eye [176]. The clinical picture of anterior lens dislocation may be supplemented by a sharp increase in IOP; the anterior chamber is shallower than in the fellow eye, and the iridocorneal angle is closed upon gonioscopy. When the lens luxates into the anterior chamber, the condition is complicated by corneal decompensation due to iridolenticular contact. Posterior lens dislocation may be accompanied by vitreous prolapse into the anterior chamber. The iridocorneal angle is usually open, but pupillary block with secondary angle closure may develop [173-175, 177].
1.6.4.2. Clinical presentation of phacomorphic glaucoma
An increase in lens size is accompanied by progressive myopization, a shallow anterior chamber, and narrowing of the iridocorneal angle. Biomicroscopy reveals uneven lens opacification, fluid clefts in immature cataracts, a pearly color of the lens, anterior shift of the iridolenticular diaphragm, and a dull red reflex from the fundus. These signs may be unilateral. The clinical course resembles an acute attack of angle-closure glaucoma. Examination of the fellow eye reveals a deeper anterior chamber and a thinner lens, which rules out an acute attack of primary angle-closure glaucoma. Measurement of the anteroposterior axis and determination of refraction are useful for comparison with the fellow eye [173, 174, 179, 181, 180, 176].
1.6.4.3. Clinical presentation of phacolytic glaucoma
The phacolytic mechanism is accompanied by the development of a pronounced pain syndrome, hyperemia of the eyeball, and a high level of IOP. The difference from an acute attack of angle-closure glaucoma is a deep anterior chamber, absence of pupillary block, and an open iridocorneal angle. Examination reveals diffuse corneal edema and a white hypermature cataract [189, 203, 190, 191, 194, 196].
In phacoanaphylactic uveitis, conjunctival hyperemia, corneal edema with endothelial precipitates, and hypopyon are noted. IOP may be normal or elevated due to the effect of inflammatory cells and high-molecular-weight proteins on the trabecular meshwork [191, 197, 198].
In the phacotoxic/phacoflytic mechanism, white particles of lens matter, which may have a dense consistency and form a pseudohypopyon, are visualized in the anterior chamber aqueous humor [199-202].
1.6.5. Clinical presentation of drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma
The clinical picture of steroid-induced glaucoma is similar to that of primary open-angle glaucoma [1, 216].
1.6.6. Clinical presentation of post-traumatic glaucoma
1.6.6.1. Clinical picture of post-traumatic glaucoma due to blunt ocular trauma in the early period
Clinical signs indicating the possibility of glaucoma development in the early period after blunt eye trauma may include hyphema, deformation and/or rupture of the pupillary sphincter, iridodialysis and/or cyclodialysis, lens subluxation or dislocation, as well as retinal detachment. In the early post-traumatic period, a slight decrease in IOP may be noted as a result of inflammatory processes, reduced aqueous humor production, and structural disorders in the iridocorneal angle with increased aqueous humor outflow. In some cases, IOP may be elevated due to blockade of the trabecular meshwork by red blood cells, inflammatory cells, and cell breakdown products. In such cases, IOP normalizes within a few days or weeks.
1.6.6.2. Clinical picture of post-traumatic glaucoma due to blunt ocular trauma in the late period
Clinical signs of angle recession may include hyphema, iridodialysis, exposure of a wide ciliary body band, and an abnormally white scleral spur.
In ghost cell glaucoma, small khaki-colored ghost cells are visualized in the anterior chamber. The term "ghost cell" is used because the cells appear empty except for the presence of denatured hemoglobin visible on histopathology (Heinz bodies). Precipitation of these cells forms a yellowish-brown pseudohypopyon. The "candy stripe" sign appears when layers of fresh red blood cells and ghost cells overlap.
In hemolytic glaucoma, gonioscopy reveals an open iridocorneal angle with a reddish-brown trabecular meshwork band.
1.6.6.3. Clinical presentation of post-traumatic glaucoma due to open ocular trauma
Penetrating eye injuries may not be diagnosed on visual inspection alone; therefore, any history of facial trauma should raise suspicion of a penetrating globe injury. Attention should be paid to pupillary distortion, lens opacification, uveal prolapse, and vitreous hemorrhage. Intraocular pressure after a penetrating injury is typically low due to the open wound [262, 263, 225, 264, 233].
Depending on the mechanism and extent of the trauma, open globe injuries are classified into 5 types:
- Type A – contusion rupture of the eyewall (full-thickness wound caused by a blunt object);
- Type B – penetrating injuries – local full-thickness injuries to the eyewall without intraocular foreign body retention, typically caused by a sharp wounding projectile;
- Type C – local full-thickness (penetrating) injuries to the eyewall with intraocular foreign body retention;
- Type D – perforating injuries with double (entry and exit) full-thickness penetration of the eyewall;
- Type E – mixed, difficult-to-classify cases of severe polytrauma combining injuries to both intraocular contents and the eyewall (with perforation) or globe rupture.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Criteria for establishing the disease or condition
Criteria for diagnosing inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma
- periodic or permanent elevation of intraocular pressure above the individual's normal range;
- structural pathological changes of the optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer;
- typical visual field defects corresponding to optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer damage;
- presence of an inflammatory process or its consequences that caused the intraocular pressure elevation and characteristic structural and functional glaucomatous changes.
Criteria for diagnosing neovascular glaucoma
- periodic or permanent elevation of intraocular pressure above the individual's normal range;
- structural pathological changes of the optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer;
- typical visual field defects corresponding to optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer damage;
- rubeosis iridis, new vessels in the iridocorneal angle, presence of a fibrovascular membrane on the iris surface and in the iridocorneal angle;
- presence of signs of retinal ischemia – hemorrhages, cotton-wool spots, neovascularization of the optic disc and retina, non-perfusion areas according to OCT angiography and fluorescein angiography of the eye;
- presence of a systemic or ophthalmic disease initiating retinal ischemia (diabetes mellitus, central retinal vein occlusion, etc.);
Criteria for diagnosing phlebotensive glaucoma
- marked dilation and tortuosity of episcleral veins, open iridocorneal angle profile with blood filling Schlemm's canal;
- periodic or permanent elevation of intraocular pressure above the individual's normal range;
- structural pathological changes of the optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer;
- typical visual field defects corresponding to optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer damage;
Criteria for diagnosing phacogenic glaucoma
- presence of lens pathology combined with signs of dislocation, increased size, or compromised integrity characteristic of the respective phacogenic glaucoma subtype;
- periodic or permanent elevation of intraocular pressure above the individual's normal range;
- structural pathological changes of the optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer;
- typical visual field defects corresponding to optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer damage.
Criteria for diagnosing drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma
- periodic or permanent elevation of intraocular pressure above the individual's normal range;
- structural pathological changes of the optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer;
- typical visual field defects corresponding to optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer damage;
- history of topical, periocular, intraocular, or inhalation corticosteroid therapy.
Criteria for diagnosing post-traumatic glaucoma
- history of ocular trauma with characteristic biomicroscopic signs.
- periodic or permanent elevation of intraocular pressure above the individual's normal range;
- structural pathological changes of the optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer;
- typical visual field defects corresponding to optic nerve head and retinal nerve fiber layer damage.
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
2.1.1. Inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma. History and symptoms.
It is recommended to conduct a thorough medical history and symptom assessment in all patients with ocular pathology in order to identify factors that may influence diagnosis verification and treatment choice selection [19][128].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments:
1. During history taking and symptom assessment, it is recommended to pay attention to risk factors for the onset and progression of the inflammatory process of the eyeball, as well as family history, general and ophthalmic status, presence/absence of systemic and infectious diseases, allergic reactions and drug intolerance, frequency and duration of medications used, with a review of relevant medical documentation and assessment of the impact of visual functions on daily life and activities [3, 2].
2. Potential visual symptoms associated with the underlying inflammatory disease: redness, photophobia, pain, accommodation disorders, decreased and/or blurred vision, floaters, flashes of light, lightning, line distortion, visual field loss, color perception disorders, changes in iris color, pupil size, and shape.
3. During questioning, attention should be paid to joint, muscle, and back pain, skin rashes, nail lesions, oral and/or genital ulcers, finger numbness, headaches and their characteristics, tinnitus and/or ringing in the ears, hearing impairment, cough (not caused by smoking or colds), graying and hair loss, vitiligo, nocturia, low-grade fever, and presence of thrombophlebitis.
4. Presence/absence of surgeries and trauma to the visual organ
5. The presence of general diseases diagnosed by specialists should be clarified.
2.1.2. Neovascular glaucoma. History and symptoms.
It is recommended to conduct a thorough medical history and symptom assessment in all patients with ocular pathology in order to identify factors that may influence diagnosis verification and treatment choice selection [3, 19, 1, 2, 145].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments:
1. During history taking and symptom assessment, it is recommended to pay attention to risk factors for retinal ischemia in neovascular glaucoma, as well as family history, general and ophthalmic status [3, 2].
2. Presence/absence of surgeries and trauma to the visual organ
3. The presence of general diseases diagnosed by specialists should be clarified.
2.1.3. Phlebotensive glaucoma. History and symptoms.
It is recommended to conduct a thorough medical history and symptom assessment in all patients with ocular pathology in order to identify factors that may influence diagnosis verification and treatment choice selection [3, 19, 1, 2, 169].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
2.1.4. Phacogenic glaucomas. History and symptoms.
See section 2.4. Instrumental diagnostic procedures
2.1.5. Drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma. History and symptoms.
See section 2.4. Instrumental diagnostic procedures
2.1.6. Post-traumatic glaucoma. History and symptoms.
See section 2.4. Instrumental diagnostic procedures
2.2 Physical Examination
2.2.1. Inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma. Physical examination.
There are no specific signs of uveitic glaucoma that can be detected during a physical examination. General propaedeutic principles of patient examination must be followed.
It is recommended to refer patients with uveitic glaucoma and concomitant systemic diseases for consultation with specialized specialists to clarify systemic and syndromic diseases associated with uveitis, which is important for the patient's further treatment strategy [2, 20].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the choice of specialist profile (rheumatologist, neurologist, dermatovenereologist, pulmonologist, hematologist, general practitioner, cardiologist, otorhinolaryngologist, urologist, obstetrician-gynecologist, gastroenterologist, pediatrician, dentist) is determined depending on whether the patient has a suspected systemic disease and the risk of systemic complications.
2.2.2. Neovascular glaucoma. Physical examination.
There are no specific signs of neovascular glaucoma that can be detected during a physical examination. General propaedeutic principles of patient examination must be followed.
2.2.3. Phlebotensive glaucoma. Physical examination.
There are no specific signs of phlebotensive glaucoma that can be detected during a physical examination. General propaedeutic principles of patient examination must be followed.
2.2.4. Phacogenic glaucomas. Physical examination.
There are no specific signs of phacogenic glaucomas that can be detected during a physical examination. General propaedeutic principles of patient examination must be followed.
2.2.5. Drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma. Physical examination.
There are no specific signs of steroid glaucoma that can be detected during a physical examination. General propaedeutic principles of patient examination must be followed.
2.2.6. Post-traumatic glaucoma. Physical examination.
There are no specific signs of post-traumatic glaucoma that can be detected during a physical examination. General propaedeutic principles of patient examination must be followed.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
2.3.1. Inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma. Laboratory diagnostic examinations.
There are no diagnostic criteria for inflammatory glaucoma based on clinical laboratory test data.
It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (CBC) with differential, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) test, general clinical biochemical blood test (including glucose level, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) activity, total bilirubin and fractions (free and conjugated bilirubin), creatinine, blood urea, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP)), serological testing for antibodies to Treponema pallidum by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), HIV (A26.06.048, A26.06.048), HBsAg (A26.06.036), HCV (A26.06.041.002), and a general urinalysis for all patients with non-infectious uveitis to assess general status, rule out an infectious etiology of uveitis, and when planning and modifying patient management tactics [28, 20, 280].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that patients with non-infectious uveitis undergo additional instrumental and laboratory tests when indicated (determination of HLA-B27 and HLA-B51 antigens by flow cytometry, anti-nuclear antibodies to Sm antigen, and rheumatoid factor in the blood) to detect systemic and syndromic diseases associated with uveitis, which is important for determining further treatment tactics [20, 29, 30].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
2.3.2. Neovascular glaucoma. Laboratory diagnostic examinations.
There are no diagnostic criteria for neovascular glaucoma based on clinical laboratory test data.
2.3.3. Phlebotensive glaucoma. Laboratory diagnostic examinations.
There are no diagnostic criteria for phlebotensive glaucoma based on clinical laboratory test data. In endocrine ophthalmopathy, there may be an increase or decrease in serum thyroid hormone levels and elevated anti-thyroperoxidase antibodies.
2.3.4. Phacogenic glaucomas. Laboratory diagnostic examinations.
There are no diagnostic criteria for phacogenic glaucomas based on clinical laboratory test data.
2.3.5. Drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma. Laboratory diagnostic examinations.
There are no diagnostic criteria for steroid glaucoma based on clinical laboratory test data.
2.3.6. Post-traumatic glaucoma. Laboratory diagnostic examinations.
There are no diagnostic criteria for post-traumatic glaucoma based on clinical laboratory test data.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
2.4.1. Inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma. Instrumental diagnostic examinations.
It is recommended to perform visometry in all patients with inflammatory glaucoma during diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment monitoring to assess the severity of visual impairment [31, 2, 27, 32].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform refractometry in all patients with inflammatory glaucoma to determine concomitant refractive errors and the possibility of their correction for static perimetry [3, 2, 33-35].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: The examination is performed with refractive correction using glasses or contact lenses (if the anterior segment of the eye is intact), applying an age-appropriate presbyopic correction using a lens from a trial lens set (with a clear rim to eliminate errors) placed in a special holder integrated into the perimeter design or in the patient's own near-vision glasses. Correction of any refractive error is critical for perimetry accuracy.
It is recommended to perform ophthalmotonometry in all patients with inflammatory glaucoma and suspected cases for diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment efficacy monitoring [36, 3, 18, 25, 2, 37].
Leveled of Evidence CLevel of Data Reliability 2Level of evidence C (level of data reliability – 2)
Comment: The baseline IOP measurement method adopted in the Russian Federation is Maklakov tonometry (Pt) using a 10 g weight (TGD-01 intraocular pressure tonometer). Measuring IOP using the Goldmann tonometer (Po) is standard practice worldwide, and its results differ from tonometric values. To compare the two tonometry methods, the Nesterov-Egorov conversion ruler for the Maklakov intraocular pressure tonometer (10 g weight) can be used. Non-contact tonometry (pneumotonometry) should be considered as a screening method for determining IOP levels. During follow-up, it is recommended to use a single baseline tonometry method for accurate comparison of results [19, 38-42]. Transpalpebral bimanual palpation tonometry may be used during acute inflammatory eye diseases.
IOP monitoring is also necessary when selecting topical hypotensive therapy, taking into account the onset of drug action, peak effect, and washout period [43-48].
IOP measurement must be performed prior to gonioscopy and pupillary dilation [2].
It is recommended to perform eye biomicroscopy in all patients with inflammatory glaucoma to assess the state of ocular media and structures during diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment monitoring in order to detect signs of inflammation and assess the transparency of optical media [49, 24, 25, 2, 20].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: Measuring the depth of the peripheral anterior chamber using the van Herick method is part of biomicroscopy and helps roughly estimate the degree of angle closure/opening. Additional criteria to consider during biomicroscopy include: uneven arteriolar narrowing and venular dilation, ampullary vascular dilation, microaneurysms, small hemorrhages, asymmetry in anterior segment changes, degree of endothelial pigmentation, keratic precipitates, neovascularization, inflammatory Koeppe/Busacca nodules, iris heterochromia, and stromal/pigment border atrophy [49, 24, 25, 20, 50].
It is recommended to perform gonioscopy in all patients with suspected or confirmed glaucoma to determine the causes of elevated intraocular pressure and develop optimal treatment tactics [3, 18, 2, 37].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: Gonioscopy is based on identifying angle landmarks and should include the evaluation of the following features: angle width (i.e., the distance between the corneal endothelium and the iris root), iris insertion level, iris contour, trabecular pigmentation degree, areas of iridocorneal adhesions or synechiae, and presence of neovascularization. To systematize gonioscopic findings, it is advisable to use the classifications of E.G.A. van Beuningen, G. Spaeth, or R. Shaffer [51-53]. Ultrasound biomicroscopy and/or anterior segment OCT can be used in addition to gonioscopy to assess anterior chamber angle changes [54, 55].
The examination is contraindicated in patients with inflammatory conditions of the ocular surface and cannot be performed accurately in patients with severe corneal opacities and/or hyphema.
It is recommended to perform fundus biomicroscopy or ophthalmoscopy under pharmacologic mydriasis in all patients with inflammatory glaucoma to evaluate optic disc and retinal changes [1-3, 158].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: Ophthalmoscopy is performed using various models of ophthalmoscopes; fundus biomicroscopy under pharmacologic mydriasis employs non-contact lenses for indirect ophthalmoscopy (to obtain a stereoscopic image). Ophthalmoscopy requires quantitative and qualitative characterization of parameters (Appendix G1).
In cases of primary angle-closure without iridectomy, fundus examination with a dilated pupil (using short-acting mydriatics) is possible under medical supervision to rule out the potential risk of an acute glaucoma attack.
Qualitative characteristics:
- NRR. To determine the characteristics of the neuroretinal rim (NRR), it is recommended to use the ISNT rule (Inferior, Superior, Nasalis, Temporalis). In eyes with initial or moderately advanced glaucomatous damage, NRR tissue loss is observed predominantly in the infero- and superotemporal sectors of the optic disc. In eyes with advanced glaucomatous atrophy, NRR damage is more noticeable on the temporal side along the horizontal meridian. In far-advanced glaucoma, the thinned NRR is located mainly in the nasal sector, with its better-preserved part situated in the superonasal quadrant rather than the inferonasal one. When assessing the NRR, the ISNT rule can only be used for standard optic disc sizes; for large and small sizes, as well as in myopia with tilted disc insertion, NRR assessment is difficult and requires follow-up over time to detect disease progression. The sensitivity and specificity of the method do not exceed 80% [56-58]. In patients with active uveitis, hyperemia and edema of the optic disc may occur, which prevents correct interpretation of the degree of glaucomatous changes.
- RNFL. Local or diffuse thinning (defects) best visualized in red-free light
- optic disc hemorrhage - presence
- peripapillary atrophy - presence and area
Quantitative characteristics:
● optic disc (size and shape, small, medium, large)
● cup (size and shape)
● ratio of the maximum cup size to the optic disc diameter (C/D ratio)
When examining the fundus, attention should also be paid to: the size and shape of the optic disc; the size, shape, and degree of pallor (pink or decolorized) of the NRR; the size of the cup relative to the optic disc size, configuration (nature of the temporal margin: sloping, steep, undermined), and depth of the cup (shallow, medium, deep); the C/D ratio; the severity of peripapillary chorioretinal atrophy; the location of the vascular bundle and associated symptoms of "drilling" ("bayoneting") and attenuation of the so-called circumlinear vessel of the optic disc; hemorrhages on the optic disc; the diameter of retinal arterioles and the state of the RNFL [59-62].
It is recommended to perform automated perimetry in all patients with suspected or established uveitic glaucoma to determine functional changes and monitor them to control disease progression [23-26, 63, 41, 64]
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comment: White-on-white threshold central visual field perimetry (10°, 24° and 30°) is the preferred method for early detection of visual field defects [63, 64]. To evaluate standard automated perimetry (SAP) results, various indices are used, such as mean defect or mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), as well as various diagnostic tests confirming the results of computer-based progression analysis during dynamic follow-up. SAP is difficult to reproduce in patients with low visual acuity and cognitive impairment. In the far-advanced stage, Goldmann perimetry to determine peripheral visual field boundaries, or tests designed for low visual acuity using a stimulus larger than the standard size, can be an acceptable alternative. It is advisable to consider the degree of asymmetry of the parameters mentioned above to establish a diagnosis. The frequency of perimetry depends on the rate of disease progression. During follow-up, it is recommended to use a single baseline perimetry method for accurate comparison of the obtained results.
When interpreting perimetry results, it is necessary to account for the presence of inflammatory and atrophic foci in the fundus, macular or peripapillary edema, and the degree of vitreous and lens opacification. To diagnose glaucoma, perimetry is best performed during periods of uveitis remission.
2.4.2. Neovascular glaucoma. Instrumental diagnostic examinations.
It is recommended to perform visual acuity testing in all patients with neovascular glaucoma during initial diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment monitoring to determine the severity of visual impairment [3, 19, 1, 2, 146, 143, 145].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform refractometry in all patients with neovascular glaucoma to identify concomitant refractive errors and neutralize them for static perimetry [3, 19, 1, 2, 145].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform ophthalmotonometry in all patients with neovascular glaucoma and suspected cases for diagnosis, follow-up, and evaluation of treatment efficacy [3, 19, 1, 2, 146, 143, 145].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Intraocular pressure (IOP) monitoring is also necessary when selecting local hypotensive therapy, taking into account the onset of drug action, its peak effect, and the washout period [19].
IOP measurement must be performed prior to gonioscopy and pupil dilation [2, 143].
It is recommended to perform slit-lamp biomicroscopy of the eye to assess ocular media and structures in all patients with neovascular glaucoma during initial diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment monitoring to detect signs of anterior segment neovascularization and evaluate optical media transparency [3, 19, 1, 2, 146, 143, 145].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform gonioscopy in all patients with suspected or established neovascular glaucoma to determine the presence of neovascularization and peripheral anterior synechiae as causes of increased intraocular pressure and to develop optimal management tactics [3, 19, 1, 2, 146, 143, 145].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: The examination is contraindicated in patients with inflammatory conditions of the ocular surface and cannot be performed correctly in patients with pronounced corneal opacities and/or hyphema.
It is recommended to perform fundus biomicroscopy or ophthalmoscopy in all patients with neovascular glaucoma to assess optic disc and retinal changes [3, 19, 1, 2, 146, 145].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: Ophthalmoscopy is performed using various models of ophthalmoscopes; fundus biomicroscopy under medical mydriasis utilizes non-contact lenses for indirect fundus ophthalmoscopy (to obtain a stereoscopic image). Ophthalmoscopy requires both quantitative and qualitative characterization of parameters.
If pupillary rubeosis is present, the decision to perform medical mydriasis should be made after assessing the risk of hyphema from newly formed vessels.
It is recommended to perform automated perimetry in all patients with suspected or established neovascular glaucoma to determine functional changes and monitor them to control disease progression [3, 19, 1, 2, 145].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: changes in perimetry data depend not only on the stage of the glaucomatous process but also on the underlying disease—the severity of post-thrombotic retinopathy, manifestations of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, etc.
2.4.3. Phlebohypertensive glaucoma. Instrumental diagnostic examinations.
It is recommended to perform visual acuity testing in all patients with phlebohypertensive glaucoma during initial diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment monitoring to determine the severity of visual impairment [3, 19, 1, 2, 169].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform refractometry in all patients with phlebohypertensive glaucoma to identify concomitant refractive errors and neutralize them for static perimetry [3, 19, 1, 2, 169].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform ophthalmotonometry in all patients with phlebohypertensive glaucoma and suspected cases for diagnosis, follow-up, and evaluation of treatment efficacy [3, 19, 1, 2, 169].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform slit-lamp biomicroscopy of the eye in all patients with phlebohypertensive glaucoma during initial diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment monitoring to assess ocular media and structures [3, 19, 1, 2, 169].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform gonioscopy in all patients with suspected or established phlebohypertensive glaucoma to determine the iridocorneal angle profile and blood reflux into Schlemm's canal [1, 169].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Pronounced eyeball proptosis and conjunctival chemosis in carotid-cavernous fistula may hinder gonioscopy.
It is recommended to perform fundus biomicroscopy or ophthalmoscopy in all patients to assess optic disc and retinal changes [3, 19, 1, 2].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform automated perimetry in all patients with suspected or established glaucoma to determine functional changes and monitor them to control disease progression [3, 19, 1, 2].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: detected visual field changes may be caused not only by glaucoma but also by the underlying cause of venous outflow impairment: endocrine compressive optic neuropathy, cerebral blood flow disorders, etc.
2.4.4. Phacogenic glaucomas. Instrumental diagnostic examinations.
It is recommended to perform a standard set of initial diagnostic procedures, including taking complaints and anamnesis, visometry, refractometry, static perimetry, tonometry, biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, and ophthalmoscopy in all patients with phacogenic glaucomas [1-3, 19, 173-176, 181, 189, 190, 196-198, 203].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: when performing gonioscopy in phacomorphic glaucoma, the anterior chamber angle is closed, and Forbes compression test is negative.
2.4.5. Drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma. Instrumental diagnostic examinations.
It is recommended to perform a standard set of initial diagnostic procedures, including taking complaints and anamnesis, visometry, refractometry, static perimetry, tonometry, biomicroscopy, gonioscopy, and ophthalmoscopy [1, 212, 217, 216].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: when taking anamnesis, it is recommended to pay attention to the presence of systemic or ophthalmological diseases (uveitis, vasculitis, asthma, dermatitis). Biomicroscopy may reveal other signs of corticosteroid use (thickening and/or of the cornea, posterior subcapsular cataract, ptosis, eyelid skin atrophy) [1, 212, 209, 216].
2.4.6. Post-traumatic glaucoma. Instrumental diagnostic examinations.
2.4.6.1. Post-traumatic glaucoma due to blunt eye trauma in the early period. Instrumental diagnostic examinations.
It is recommended to perform a standard set of initial diagnostic procedures taking into account the possible lack of transparency of ocular media [230, 232, 224, 233].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment:
The presence of hemorrhage in the anterior chamber reduces the likelihood of performing visometry, refractometry, static perimetry, gonioscopy, and ophthalmoscopy. Among additional diagnostic methods, ultrasound biomicroscopy should be preferred to assess the state of the anterior segment structures of the eye [234].
2.4.6.2. Post-traumatic glaucoma due to blunt eye trauma in the late period. Instrumental diagnostic examinations.
It is recommended to perform a standard set of initial diagnostic procedures taking into account the possible lack of transparency of ocular media [249, 245, 253, 233, 255].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment:
The presence of hemorrhage in the anterior chamber reduces the likelihood of performing visometry, refractometry, static perimetry, gonioscopy, and ophthalmoscopy. Among additional diagnostic methods, ultrasound biomicroscopy should be preferred to assess the state of ocular structures [234].
2.4.6.3. Post-traumatic glaucoma due to open eye trauma. Instrumental diagnostic examinations.
It is recommended to perform a standard set of initial diagnostic procedures, including taking complaints and anamnesis, visometry, refractometry, static perimetry, tonometry, biomicroscopy, and ophthalmoscopy without applying pressure to the eyeball in all patients with suspected penetrating eye injury [263, 265, 264].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to perform iris transillumination to detect the defect through which a foreign body could have entered the posterior chamber in all patients with suspected penetrating eye injury [263, 265, 264].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform gonioscopy to detect a foreign body in the iridocorneal angle provided there is no hypotony in patients with suspected penetrating eye injury [263, 265, 264].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform ophthalmoscopy under conditions of drug-induced mydriasis (in the absence of head trauma) to detect intraocular foreign bodies in patients with suspected penetrating eye injury [263, 265, 264].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
2.5 Other Procedures
2.5.1. Inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma. Other diagnostic examinations.
In the absence of conclusive data for establishing a diagnosis or determining disease progression, a number of additional (confirmatory) diagnostic methods may be performed in an ophthalmology office (consultative and diagnostic department), ophthalmology department, or Medical Ophthalmology Center.
Structural and functional techniques (tests) are continuously improving, becoming increasingly sensitive to the earliest changes. From the perspective of comparing these two types of monitoring strategies, the gap between observed functional losses and their preceding structural changes is steadily narrowing. Structural changes prevail at the beginning of the disease (suspected glaucoma, initial stage). At the advanced stage of the disease, morphofunctional lesions and their dynamics are in approximate equilibrium. At the far-advanced stage, functional changes predominate and serve as the target for monitoring glaucoma optic neuropathy (GON).
It is recommended to perform ultrasound pachymetry in all patients with uveitic glaucoma and suspected glaucoma to refine the results of tonometry measurements [65-67].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: The normal distribution of central corneal thickness (CCT) in the adult population is 473-597 µm (mean - 540±30 µm). Significant deviations from average CCT values (±50 µm) can affect tonometry results. To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the use of tonometry correction algorithms based on CCT data. It is advisable to divide corneas into thin (481-520 µm), medium (521-560 µm), and thick (>561 µm), and to take the associated risk into account [66-68]. The test is not indicated for patients with ocular surface inflammatory processes and cannot be performed correctly in patients with pronounced corneal changes.
It is recommended to perform an ultrasound examination of the eyeball in patients with uveitis and insufficient transparency of the optical media, as well as with sclerouveitis or concomitant orbital changes during disease diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment monitoring to assess intraocular and orbital changes [24, 25].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an optical examination of the optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer using a computerized analyzer (optical coherence tomography, OCT) for quantitative and qualitative assessment of the state of the optic nerve, retinal and choroidal changes, and monitoring treatment efficacy [69-71]
GGR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: The results of OCT examinations during periods of active inflammation are difficult to interpret. During these periods, an increase in retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness is noted compared to healthy individuals.
2.5.2. Neovascular glaucoma. Other diagnostic examinations.
In the absence of conclusive data for establishing a diagnosis or determining disease progression, a number of additional (confirmatory) diagnostic methods may be performed in an ophthalmology office (consultative and diagnostic department), ophthalmology department, or Medical Ophthalmology Center.
Structural and functional techniques (tests) are continuously improving, becoming increasingly sensitive to the earliest changes. From the perspective of comparing these two types of monitoring strategies, the gap between observed functional losses and their preceding structural changes is steadily narrowing. Structural changes prevail at the beginning of the disease (suspected glaucoma, initial stage). At the advanced stage of the disease, morphofunctional lesions and their dynamics are in approximate equilibrium. At the far-advanced stage, functional changes predominate and serve as the target for monitoring glaucoma optic neuropathy (GON).
It is recommended to perform ultrasound pachymetry in patients with neovascular glaucoma and suspected glaucoma to refine the results of tonometry measurements [65-67].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: The normal distribution of central corneal thickness (CCT) in the adult population is 473-597 µm (mean – 540±30 µm). Significant deviations from average CCT values (±50 µm) can affect tonometry results. To date, no consensus has been reached regarding the use of tonometry correction algorithms based on CCT data. It is advisable to divide corneas into thin (481-520 µm), medium (521-560 µm), and thick (>561 µm), and to take the associated risk into account [66-68].
It is recommended to perform an ultrasound examination of the eyeball in patients with neovascular glaucoma and insufficient transparency of the optical media during disease diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment monitoring to assess intraocular and orbital changes [146, 144].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an optical examination of the optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer using a computerized analyzer (optical coherence tomography, OCT angiography) for quantitative and qualitative assessment of the state of the optic nerve, retinal and choroidal changes, assessment of non-perfusion zones, vascular anomalies, and neovascular vessels at the level of the retinal vascular plexuses, and monitoring treatment efficacy [69-71]
GCR BLoE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
2.5.2.1. Differential diagnosis of neovascular glaucoma
Neovascular glaucoma at the open-angle stage should be differentiated from uveitic glaucoma, which would be ruled out by a characteristic sign of neovascular glaucoma – neovascularization on the iris surface and in the iridocorneal angle. At the secondary angle-closure stage, in addition to angle-closure glaucoma, the differential diagnosis should include other causes of peripheral anterior synechiae formation (prior eye trauma and iridocorneal endothelial syndrome).
2.5.3. Phlebohypertensive glaucoma. Other diagnostic examinations.
Color Doppler imaging of the ocular vessels may be indicated to differentiate patients with idiopathic episcleral venous dilation from those with carotid-cavernous fistula, who may require invasive catheter angiography. Patients with carotid-cavernous fistula exhibit a characteristic reverse blood flow in the dilated superior ophthalmic vein, whereas in idiopathic episcleral venous dilation, orbital color Doppler imaging demonstrates normal retrograde blood flow through the superior ophthalmic vein [171]. Computed tomography of the orbits and brain is used when intracranial hemorrhage, compression of neural structures, and other complications of the disease are suspected.
2.5.3.1. Differential diagnosis of phlebohypertensive glaucoma
Phacolytic glaucoma should be differentiated from inflammatory diseases of the anterior segment of the eye accompanied by pronounced conjunctival hyperemia. Visual examination of the eyeball may reveal exophthalmos, incomplete eyelid closure, ciliary injection, dilated and tortuous veins, impaired ocular mobility, and impaired eyeball reposition. In carotid-cavernous fistula, a pulsing bruit is noted upon auscultation in the orbital region. Ophthalmoscopy reveals venous dilation and edema, optic disc edema, and punctate retinal hemorrhages.
2.5.4. Phacogenic glaucomas. Other diagnostic procedures.
It is recommended to perform ultrasound biomicroscopy of the eyeball and anterior segment optical coherence tomography as additional diagnostic methods to determine the position of the lens relative to the structures of the eyeball, as well as the shape of the anterior chamber and the iridocorneal angle [1, 173, 174, 178, 180].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: in phacomorphic glaucoma, a convex volcano-like iris profile may be determined, with tight contact of the posterior surface of the iris with the anterior surface of the lens throughout, anterior shift of the lens-iris diaphragm, a large lens, and a slit-like or non-visualized posterior chamber of the eye.
2.5.4.1. Differential diagnosis of phacogenic glaucomas
Phacogenic glaucomas should be differentiated from post-traumatic glaucoma, in which subluxation or dislocation of the lens may also be observed; however, there will be a history of trauma, as well as characteristic clinical signs of injury: hyphema, deformation and/or rupture of the pupillary sphincter, iridodialysis and/or cyclodialysis, and retinal detachment.
2.5.5. Drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma. Other diagnostic procedures.
It is recommended to perform ultrasound keratopachymetry in patients with steroid glaucoma and suspected steroid glaucoma to clarify tonometry results [1, 212, 217, 216].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an optical examination of the optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer using a computer analyzer (optical coherence tomography, OCT angiography) in patients with steroid glaucoma and suspected steroid glaucoma to perform a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the state of the optic nerve, retinal and choroidal changes, evaluate non-perfusion zones, vascular anomalies, and newly formed vessels at the level of the retinal vascular plexuses, and monitor treatment efficacy [1, 212, 217, 216]
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
2.5.5.1. Differential diagnosis of drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma
This form of glaucoma should be differentiated from primary open-angle glaucoma, from which the steroid form will differ by the systemic or local use of corticosteroids.
2.5.6. Post-traumatic glaucoma. Other diagnostic procedures.
It is recommended to perform an ultrasound examination of the eyeball (A04.26.002) in all patients with closed eye trauma in cases of insufficient transparency of the optical media to determine the state of the intraocular media, retina, and choroid, assess the severity of hemophthalmos, and determine the position of the lens or IOL [281, 282, 283].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform radiography of the orbit (A06.26.001) and radiography of the paranasal sinuses (A06.08.003) in all patients with suspected penetrating eye injury. It is recommended to perform computed tomography (CT) of the orbits (A06.26.006) in patients with suspected penetrating eye injury to rule out damage to the bone walls and optic nerve, as well as damage to the fibrous tunic in the posterior pole regarding a "silent" scleral rupture [263, 265, 264].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
2.5.6.1. Differential diagnosis of post-traumatic glaucoma
Post-traumatic glaucoma has characteristic clinical signs, including a history of trauma, as well as hyphema, deformation and/or rupture of the pupillary sphincter, iridodialysis and/or cyclodialysis, subluxation or dislocation of the lens, and retinal detachment
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
3.1. Treatment of inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma, including medical, laser, and surgical treatment
Successful treatment of uveitic glaucoma requires adequate simultaneous therapy for both the inflammatory process and intraocular pressure lowering. As a rule, the main goal should be the suppression of inflammation. Inadequate therapy for uveitis to avoid the development of steroid-induced hypertension can lead to inflammatory trabeculopathy with an even greater increase in intraocular pressure.
In acute uveitis with elevated IOP only during exacerbation periods, intraocular pressure can often be normalized with a course of local hypotensive therapy. In cases of a chronic inflammatory process requiring therapy with high doses of systemic corticosteroids (H02A), the addition of immunosuppressants (L04A) is recommended, which will control inflammation and allow the use of lower doses of systemic corticosteroids (H02A).
Long-acting corticosteroids in the form of injections or implants (S01BA) should be used with caution due to the potential development of prolonged uncontrolled steroid-induced ocular hypertension. At the same time, the treatment of uveitis should be aggressive, aimed at the prompt relief of inflammation and the achievement of remission, since inadequate therapy aimed at avoiding a steroid-induced increase in IOP may exacerbate the adverse symptoms of prolonged inflammation and worsen the outcome of the disease (6, 27).
When treating uveitic glaucoma, a number of features should be taken into account: drugs used for primary glaucoma may demonstrate varying efficacy if IOP decreases against the background of an inflammatory reaction. Currently, there are no reliable studies comparing the hypotensive efficacy of various agents in uveitic glaucoma; however, relative contraindications to their use have been described.
It is recommended to lower the IOP level in all patients with uveitic glaucoma to prevent the progression of glaucoma optic neuropathy [36, 72, 73, 2, 74, 75].
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comment:
When choosing drugs, it is necessary to consider their efficacy, potential side effects, dosing schedule, the required percentage of IOP reduction from baseline, potential cost, availability, and patient preference [2].
Before prescribing treatment, the expected "target" pressure level should be determined, taking into account baseline intraocular pressure values, the stage of the disease, its potential rate of progression, the patient's age and expected life expectancy, as well as additional risk factors. The "target" pressure cannot be determined with any certainty in a specific patient, and there is no approved algorithm for establishing it; however, this does not negate its use in clinical practice [3, 18, 1, 2].
In all glaucoma patients, one should strive for the maximum reduction in IOP based on the stage of the disease. As an optimal characteristic of the upper limit of intraocular pressure during treatment, the values indicated below can be used taking into account the baseline normal ranges (Table 6) [2].
Table 6 – Optimal values of the upper limit of intraocular pressure during treatment
Stage of glaucoma | Pt (mmHg) | Po (mmHg) |
I, initial | 20-22 | 16-18 |
II, moderate | 19-20 | 15-16 |
III, advanced | 16-18 | 12-14 |
The personalized approach to glaucoma treatment consists of adapting it to the needs of a specific patient. Patients with marked visual impairment or young patients with disease manifestation should receive more aggressive treatment and be monitored more closely than patients at low risk of visual function deterioration [49, 76].
It is necessary to revise the "target" pressure level upon confirmation of glaucoma optic neuropathy progression, implying the need for an additional 20% IOP reduction from the previously achieved level [36, 2, 77, 78]. The use of drugs from the antiglaucoma medication and miotic groups is possible in combination with each other, as well as in combination with laser and surgical treatment methods.
3.1.1 Medical treatment of inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma
It is recommended to prescribe topical medical therapy to all patients with uveitic glaucoma to lower IOP [18, 23, 24, 1, 2].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: treatment with medicinal products from the group of "antiglaucoma preparations and miotics" is the preferred initial therapy given its favorable risk-benefit profile based on the characteristics of the glaucomatous process against the background of inflammatory processes. When choosing drugs, it is necessary to take into account their efficacy, potential side effects, dosage regimen, required percentage reduction in IOP from baseline, potential cost, availability, and patient preferences [79, 2, 80, 81].
Beta-blockers are the first-line drugs of choice in patients with uveitic glaucoma in the absence of relevant systemic contraindications (asthma or bradycardia) [1,49, 271].
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are widely used in the hypotensive therapy of uveitic glaucoma both as monotherapy and as part of the fixed combination dorzolamide + timolol.
Sympathomimetics for the treatment of glaucoma in uveitic glaucoma are classified as second-line drugs in combination with beta-blockers and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors [1,49, 271].
The use of prostaglandin analogues in uveitic glaucoma is limited by data on their variable hypotensive efficacy, the potential for enhancement and/or reactivation of uveitis, and the development of cystoid macular edema (CME). According to the literature, an unpredictable high as well as low hypotensive effect of prostaglandins in the treatment of uveitis is noted, especially during the use of topical corticosteroids (S01BA) [82-84]. Data regarding the potential for enhancement or reactivation of the inflammatory process by prostaglandin analogues vary and are debatable, but since such cases have been described, it is recommended to preferentially select other drugs from the group of antiglaucoma preparations and miotics whenever possible [85-87]. There is some evidence regarding the reactivation of herpetic keratouveitis with the use of prostaglandin analogues, and therefore their prescription for this nosology is not recommended [88-90]. It is believed that the risk of CME development during prostaglandin analogue therapy is significantly higher in pseudophakia, aphakia, and retinopathies than in uveitis; however, the presence of this information requires prescribing prostaglandins with caution in this situation [91, 86].
The use of miotics (from the group of antiglaucoma preparations and miotics, S01E) is contraindicated due to their tendency to disrupt the blood-aqueous barrier and exacerbate inflammation. In addition, pupillary constriction in uveitis contributes to the development of posterior synechiae.
Mydriatics and cycloplegics (S01F) are frequently used in uveitis to prevent the formation of posterior synechiae, but caution should be exercised as they may also exacerbate angle closure.
The main pharmacological groups of antiglaucoma preparations and miotics and their mechanism of action are presented in Table 7.
Table 7 – Main pharmacological groups of antiglaucoma preparations and miotics and their mechanism of action
Pharmacological group | INN | Dosage form, packaging | Reduction in IOP level, % | Contraindications | Side effects |
Improving intraocular fluid outflow | |||||
Prostaglandin analogues | Latanoprost 0.005% | Eye drops 2.5 ml in dropper bottles | 25-35 | Hypersensitivity to the components of the drug | Eye disorders: conjunctival hyperemia, burning, stinging, foreign body sensation, pruritus, increased pigmentation of periocular skin, eyelash changes, distichiasis, photophobia. Increased iris pigmentation (green-brown, blue/grey-brown, or yellow-brown irides), conjunctival pseudopemphigoid, iris cyst, corneal erosion, corneal edema, rarely iritis, uveitis, macular edema Very rarely periorbital fat atrophy, Systemic: dyspnea, chest pain/angina pectoris, myalgia, exacerbation of bronchial asthma; skin disorders: rash, pruritus; musculoskeletal system disorders: myalgia, arthralgia. |
Tafluprost** 0.0015% | Single-dose units of 0.3 ml in dropper tubes, 30 pcs.; Eye drops 2.5 ml in dropper bottles | 25-35 | |||
Travoprost 0,004% | Eye drops 2.5; 5; 10 ml in dropper bottles | 25-35 | |||
Bimatoprost 0,03% | Eye drops 2.5 ml in dropper bottles | 25-35 | |||
Reducing intraocular fluid production | |||||
Beta-adrenoceptor blockers (non-selective) | Timolol** 0,1%, 0,25%, 0,5% | Eye drops 5-10 ml in dropper bottles; | 20-25 | Hypersensitivity to drug components. Systemic: bronchial asthma, COPD, sinus bradycardia (<60 bpm), acute and chronic heart failure, second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, sinoatrial block, sick sinus syndrome. Local: corneal dystrophic diseases, severe allergic inflammatory diseases of the nasal mucosa. Contraindications also include breastfeeding, early childhood, newborns | Local: burning and itching in the eyes, lacrimation, conjunctival hyperemia, superficial keratitis, dry eyes, corneal hypesthesia, allergic blepharoconjunctivitis Systemic: bradycardia, arrhythmia, heart failure, collapse, AV block, decreased blood pressure, transient cerebrovascular accidents, dyspnea, bronchospasm, pulmonary failure, headache, dizziness, asthenia, peripheral edema, hypoglycemia (may be masked in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus), nocturnal systemic arterial hypotension, depression, sexual dysfunction |
Beta-adrenoceptor blockers (selective) | Betaxolol 0,25%, 0,5% | Eye drops, 5 ml in dropper bottles | ±20 | Hypersensitivity to drug components. Systemic: severe obstructive respiratory failure, sinus bradycardia (<60 bpm), acute and chronic heart failure, second- or third-degree AV block, sinoatrial block, sick sinus syndrome. | Local: burning, stinging, more pronounced than with non-selective drugs Systemic: respiratory and cardiac side effects are less pronounced than with non-selective drugs, depression, erectile dysfunction. |
Alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor blockers (S01EX Other antiglaucoma preparations) | Butylaminohydroxypropoxyphenoximethyl methyloxadiazole** 1%; 2% | Eye drops 1.5 ml in dropper tubes, 5 ml in dropper bottles | 20-25 | Hypersensitivity to drug components, bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, severe heart failure, sinus bradycardia, second- or third-degree AV block, type 1 diabetes mellitus. | Slowing of the heart rate, development of AV block, decreased blood pressure, bronchospasm, allergic reactions, transient burning sensation after instillation |
Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (systemic and topical) | Acetazolamide** 250 mg | Tablets 250 mg | 30-40 | Acute renal failure, uremia, hepatic failure, hypokalemia, hyponatremia, metabolic acidosis, hypocortisolism, Addison's disease, diabetes mellitus, first trimester of pregnancy, lactation period, children under 3 years of age. Hypersensitivity to sulfonamides | Systemic: aplastic anemia, thrombocytopenia, agranulocytosis, leukopenia, thrombocytopenic purpura, pancytopenia, anaphylactic reactions, decreased appetite, taste disturbance, metabolic acidosis, thirst, paresthesia, hearing loss, tinnitus, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, depression, irritability, confusion, decreased libido, kidney stones, hematuria, crystalluria, polyuria, renal failure, renal colic, photosensitivity, pruritus, rash, erythema, urticaria, arthralgia, asthenia, fatigue, transient myopia, somnolence, headache. |
Brinzolamide 1% | Eye drops, suspension, 5 ml in dropper bottles | 20 | Hypersensitivity to drug components, severe renal and hepatic diseases. Hypersensitivity to sulfonamides. Dorzolamide** 2% – contraindicated during pregnancy, lactation, and in newborns under 1 week of age | Local: blurred vision, blepharitis, dermatitis, dry eye, foreign body sensation, pruritus, burning, superficial punctate keratitis, lacrimation, diplopia, conjunctivitis, iridocyclitis, transient myopia, corneal edema Systemic: headache, rhinitis, epistaxis, bitter or unusual taste in the mouth, hypertension, dyspnea, chest pain, dry mouth, dyspepsia, nausea, diarrhea, back pain, pharyngitis, alopecia, allergic reactions, urticaria, bronchospasm, breathing difficulty, toxic epidermal necrolysis, angioedema, dizziness, paresthesia, urolithiasis, angioedema | |
Dorzolamide** 2% | Eye drops, 5–10 ml in dropper bottles | 20 | |||
Improving outflow and decreasing aqueous humor production | |||||
Sympathomimetics for glaucoma treatment | Brimonidine 0,1%; 0,15%; 0,2%; | Eye drops, 5–10 ml in dropper bottles | 18-25 | Hypersensitivity to the drug components, concurrent treatment with oral monoamine oxidase type A inhibitors Age under 2 years Very low body weight in adults under 20 kg Breastfeeding period | Local: allergic blepharoconjunctivitis, conjunctival hyperemia, pruritus, burning, conjunctival edema, photosensitization, conjunctival hemorrhage, lacrimation, mucous eye discharge, dry and irritated eyes, keratitis, keratopathy, visual field defects, vitreous hemorrhage, vitreous floaters, decreased visual acuity, corneal erosion, hordeolum, contact dermatitis. Systemic: headache, general weakness, somnolence, dizziness, insomnia, blood pressure fluctuations, bronchitis, cough, dyspnea, dry nasal mucosa, apnea, rash, dyspepsia, dry oral mucosa, flu-like syndrome, hypercholesterolemia, general allergic reactions, asthenia, fatigue, dysgeusia. |
** belongs to the drugs from the «List of Vital and Essential Drugs for Medical Use for 2024»
It is not recommended to use topical beta-blockers (non-selective) in patients with systemic contraindications (cardiovascular and bronchopulmonary diseases, in particular arrhythmias, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchial asthma), and/or receiving systemic beta-blockers to avoid a potential summation of adverse effects, the development of systemic adverse complications, and a decrease in the hypotensive effect of therapy [92, 93].
GOR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Preservative-free anti-glaucoma drugs and miotics are recommended for patients with ocular surface disease, meibomian gland dysfunction, chronic allergic reactions, and a history of corneal surgery as "first-line" therapy to lower IOP and improve the tolerability of topical hypotensive therapy when a prolonged treatment period (exceeding 5 years) is anticipated at any stage of the disease [94-96].
LoE 4Level of Recommendations Consensus – C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to switch the patient to a monotherapy drug from another pharmacological group in cases of:
- poor tolerability of the starting therapy drug;
- good tolerability, but failure to achieve the «target» level of ophthalmotonus [36, 2, 80].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to add a second drug or prescribe a combination drug to patients with open-angle glaucoma when monotherapy is ineffective in order to achieve the «target» IOP level [97, 98].
GCR BLoE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comment: to increase the hypotensive efficacy and patient adherence to medical treatment for glaucoma, fixed combination drops are used containing substances that, having different hypotensive mechanisms of action, exhibit an additive effect when combined (Table 8). In patients with moderate and advanced stages and/or initially high pressure levels, a faster transition or «starting» with combination therapy is possible [2, 99, 100].
Table 8 - Fixed combinations of eye drops from the group of «Anti-glaucoma preparations and miotics»
Fixed combination options | INN | Presentation, package |
Prostaglandin analogues and beta-blockers (S01ED51 Timolol in combination with other agents) | latanoprost 0.005% + timolol** 0.5% | Eye drops, 2.5 ml in dropper bottles |
Timolol** 0.5% + travoprost 0.004% | Eye drops, 2.5 ml in dropper bottles; Eye drops (preservative-free), 0.3 ml unit-dose dropper tube, No. 15 | |
tafluprost** 0.0015% + timolol** 0.5% (preservative-free) | Eye drops, 0.3 ml in unit-dose dropper tubes, 30 pcs. | |
Bimatoprost 0.03%* + timolol** 0.5% | Eye drops, 3 ml in dropper bottles; Eye drops, 3 ml in dropper bottles (preservative-free); Eye drops (preservative-free), 0.4 ml unit-dose dropper tube, No. 30 | |
Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and prostaglandin analogues (antiglaucoma preparations and miotics, S01E) | Dorzolamide** + latanoprost | Eye drops, 2.5 ml in dropper bottles |
Sympathomimetics for glaucoma and beta-blockers (S01ED51 Timolol, combinations) | brimonidine 0.2% + timolol** 0.5% | Eye drops, 5 ml in dropper bottles |
Topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and beta-blockers (S01ED51 Timolol, combinations) | brinzolamide 1% + timolol** 0.5% | Eye drops, 5 ml in dropper bottles |
Dorzolamide** 2% + Timolol** 0.5% | Eye drops, 5, 7, or 10 ml in dropper bottles; Eye drops, 0.4 ml in tube-droppers, 10, 20, 30, 60, or 90 pcs.; Eye drops, 5 ml in dropper bottles (preservative-free) | |
Alpha- and beta-adrenoreceptor blocker and sympathomimetics for glaucoma treatment (S01EX Other antiglaucoma preparations) | proxofelin | Eye drops 1.5 ml in dropper tubes, 5 pcs. |
Sympathomimetics for glaucoma treatment and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (S01EC54 Brinzolamide, combinations) | brimonidine 0.2% + brinzolamide 1% | Eye drops 5 ml in dropper bottles |
It is recommended to intensify the fixed combination with an additional drug or perform laser or surgical intervention if the "target" pressure level is not reached, in order to achieve it [3, 49, 18, 2, 101].
Level of recommendation validity 5 (level of evidentiary reliability – C)
Comment: It is possible to replace components of antiglaucoma combinations if the "target" IOP level is not achieved. The use of more than 3 (three) medicinal products simultaneously is not recommended. Increasing the frequency of instillation of antiglaucoma preparations and miotics leads to reduced treatment adherence, decreased therapeutic efficacy, and an increased number of side effects [102, 103].
Variability in treatment adherence among glaucoma patients has been noted, ranging from 5 to 80%. Factors negatively affecting adherence may be related to the prescribed medicinal products (their cost, side effects, complex dosing regimen, inconvenience of instillations in certain situations – e.g., frequent business trips); to the patient themselves (forgetfulness, concomitant pathology, insufficient understanding of the disease, demographic characteristics – e.g., gender, as men are often less adherent); to the diseases (e.g., patients with early stages are less adherent due to the absence of subjective symptoms); to the attending physician (lack of communication, insufficient information about the disease state). Lack of treatment adherence can be one of the reasons for disease progression. Although comprehensive approaches consisting of patient education combined with individual recommendations, including adaptation of the daily routine and simplified instillation regimens, can improve treatment adherence, there is generally insufficient evidence for their practical application.
It is recommended adjusting topical hypotensive therapy in pregnant / lactating patients to achieve the "target" pressure, taking into account the risk of teratogenic effects of the drugs on the fetus, the course of pregnancy, and the newborn during lactation [49, 104, 105].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comment: none of the antiglaucoma preparations and miotics is classified as safe or completely contraindicated during pregnancy. Topical glaucoma medications are prescribed only when the potential benefit of treatment outweighs the potential risk to the fetus. Basic principles for prescribing drugs: use the minimum number of drugs sufficient to achieve the "target" pressure, discuss treatment with an obstetrician-gynecologist and pediatrician, and reduce systemic absorption of the drug (by gently pressing on the medial canthal area or using punctal occlusion). The most sensitive period is the first trimester of pregnancy due to the potential teratogenic effect on the fetus of systemically administered antiglaucoma preparations and miotics. Considering the possible decrease in IOP during pregnancy in some patients, temporary cessation of topical hypotensive therapy under close observation may be considered. Beta-blockers, sympathomimetics for glaucoma treatment, and/or topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors may be prescribed during pregnancy. Prostaglandin analogues should be used with caution due to their effect on uterine tone. Therefore, if signs of uterine hypertonus appear, their administration must be discontinued. In the 9th month of pregnancy, beta-blockers and sympathomimetics for glaucoma treatment should be discontinued to avoid complications in the newborn. The use of topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors may be continued. During lactation, it is preferable to prescribe topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors and prostaglandin analogues. In some cases, antiglaucoma surgery may be considered [104, 105].
3.1.2 Laser treatment of inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma
It is recommended to perform laser iridectomy (LI) in secondary uveitic glaucoma with anterior chamber angle closure due to pupillary block [1, 2, 49]..
GGR CEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Evidence Level – 5)
Comment: in uveitic glaucoma, the efficacy and safety of LI are lower than in primary angle-closure glaucoma for the following reasons:
- in uveitic glaucoma with pupillary block, the posterior chamber may not be a single continuous space, but rather a multi-chamber system with posterior iridolenticular synechiae acting as partitions. Therefore, performing LI will not be able to ensure the opening of the iridocorneal angle throughout its extent.
- if there are adhesions between the iris and the cornea, LI can lead to corneal endothelial injury and fail to form an adequate pathway for aqueous humor outflow between the posterior and anterior chambers due to iridocorneal contact.
- in uveitic glaucoma, there is a high probability of LI closure due to the ongoing inflammatory process; therefore, it is recommended to perform at least two iridotomies and intensive treatment with topical corticosteroids (S01BA) and mydriatic and cycloplegic agents (S01F).
- if LI fails to eliminate the pupillary block, surgical intervention including iridectomy with goniosynechiolysis is recommended [1].
It is not recommended to perform laser transscleral cyclocoagulation in patients with uveitic glaucoma [1, 106].
Level of Evidence CReliability of Evidence 4Recommendation Strength Level – C (Evidence Reliability Level – 4)
Comment: cyclocoagulation in uveitic glaucoma can lead to a higher level of hypotony than in other types of glaucoma. The efficacy and safety of laser transscleral cyclophotocoagulation are currently under investigation [107, 108].
3.1.3 Surgical treatment of inflammatory (uveitic) glaucoma
It is recommended to perform surgical treatment in patients with uveitic glaucoma in order to achieve the "target" pressure to prevent clinically significant disease progression in the presence of:
- elevated IOP levels that cannot be normalized by any other treatment method;
- progressive deterioration of visual functions at an IOP level that does not exceed the upper limit of the normal statistical range, but exceeds its "target" values;
- the impossibility of implementing other treatment methods (including non-compliance with medical recommendations, pronounced side effects, or unavailability of appropriate pharmacotherapy);
- the impossibility of adequate medical monitoring of the glaucomatous process and patient adherence to treatment [1-3].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment:
The choice of surgical intervention method is determined by [3, 110, 109]:
- the baseline and "target" IOP levels;
- the stage of glaucoma, the rate of disease progression;
- medical history (documented duration of the disease and available data on previous drug therapy and surgery);
- characteristics of the uveal process (severity, localization, etc.);
- pathoanatomical characteristics of the anterior segment of the eye (anterior chamber depth, state of the iridocorneal angle, presence of anterior/posterior synechiae, presence of cataract).
- risk profile (only eye, profession, refraction, comorbid conditions);
- state of the lens and the need for cataract surgery;
- the patient's opinion and expectations, their expected adherence to treatment in the postoperative period;
- surgeon's preferences and experience.
Surgical interventions performed for uveitic glaucoma include:
- A16.26.070 Trabeculectomy (sinustrabeculectomy);
- A16.26.117 Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy;
- A16.26.130 Antiglaucoma drainage implantation;
- A16.26.093.002 Phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.
Antiglaucoma surgery is recommended to be performed during the period of remission of the inflammatory process, at least 3 months after the end of the acute phase; however, in practice, this is not always feasible due to the need to reduce high IOP that is refractory to local and systemic hypotensive therapy [3, 111, 109].
Preoperative use of topical agents (S01BA) is intended to reduce the severity of the postoperative inflammatory response [272, 273].
It is recommended to perform trabeculectomy (sinustrabeculectomy) as the surgery of choice in patients with uveitic glaucoma, except for cases of aphakia, anterior segment neovascularization, and the presence of silicone oil tamponade of the vitreous cavity [114, 1, 115].
Level of Evidence CReliability of Evidence 5Recommendation Strength Level – C (Evidence Reliability Level – 5)
Comment:
- It is believed that trabeculectomy without antimetabolites has low efficacy in uveitic glaucoma [116-120]. Off-label use may include #mitomycin as an intraoperative application on cellulose sponges of a 0.1-0.5 mg/ml solution for 1-5 minutes, #fluorouracil as subconjunctival injections into the area adjacent to the filtering bleb of 0.1 ml of a 50 mg/ml solution [1, 116, 117, 120-127, 274].
- As an adjunct to trabeculectomy, antiglaucoma drainage devices (collagen antiglaucoma drainage, resorbable antiglaucoma drainage) can be used to prevent adhesion of the superficial scleral flap to the bed and thereby maintain the intrascleral slit-like space for aqueous humor outflow [128, 129]. The choice of drainage device depends on the technical capabilities and preferences of the surgeon.
- If there is a threat of filtration failure in the early postoperative period (hypervascularization and flattening of the filtering bleb), revision (needling) of the filtering bleb and subscleral needling are advisable [130].
- Unsuccessful attempts to restore lost filtration over 4-6 months are an indication for repeat intervention [114, 130].
- Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy is not the surgery of choice in uveitic glaucoma due to the uncertain duration of its hypotensive effect. Non-penetrating deep sclerectomy may be performed if it is necessary to avoid prolonged postoperative hypotony with the development of maculopathy, the risk of which is significantly higher in uveitic glaucoma when performing full fistulizing interventions [1, 32, 116, 120].
It is recommended to implant tubular drainage devices (glaucoma valve or glaucoma drainage device***) diverting aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the equator of the eyeball as the surgery of choice for patients with uveitic glaucoma in aphakia, anterior segment neovascularization, and the presence of silicone oil, as well as in cases of previous ineffective trabeculectomy [1].
GGR CEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Evidence Level – 5)
Comment: in persistent postoperative hypotony due to excessive aqueous humor drainage, steroid therapy is discontinued faster than usual.
It is recommended to perform sequential or combined surgical treatment (lens extraction/phacoemulsification with/without intraocular lens implantation and antiglaucoma surgery) in patients with concomitant cataract to improve visual functions and achieve the target pressure [49].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments:
- Trabeculectomy accelerates cataract progression; however, cataract surgery increases the risk of failure of a previously performed trabeculectomy [133, 75].
3.2. Treatment of neovascular glaucoma, including medical, laser, and surgical treatment
The treatment of neovascular glaucoma should be correlated with the stage of the disease and the transparency of the media. The treatment strategy focuses on combating retinal ischemia and neovascularization, as well as reducing IOP.
3.2.1. Treatment of neovascularization
It is recommended to perform panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) and intravitreal injections of VEGF/VEGFR (vascular endothelial growth factor) inhibitors (L01FG) in patients with neovascular glaucoma in the presence of iris rubeosis and clear optical media in order to minimize the eye's oxygen demand, reduce the amount of released VEGF, and promote regression and involution of anterior segment neovascularization. At the initial stage, a combination of these treatment methods is often prescribed [134].
GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)
Comment:
- PRP does not immediately reduce neovascularization, but has a longer-lasting therapeutic effect compared to intravitreal injections of VEGF/VEGFR (vascular endothelial growth factor) inhibitors (L01FG). An adequate volume of PRP must be chosen, from 1200 to 1600 burns per session, if 2 sessions are planned. Usually, PRP is performed in 2 or 3 sessions at five-day intervals [147];
- The combination of PRP with intravitreal administration of VEGF/VEGFR (vascular endothelial growth factor) inhibitors (L01FG) before or after laser treatment reduces the risks of hemorrhagic complications of PRP and improves the efficacy of laser treatment [148-151];
- The presence of media opacities, including cataract and vitreous hemorrhage, precludes the performance of PRP.
It is recommended to perform intravitreal administration of VEGF/VEGFR (vascular endothelial growth factor) inhibitors (L01FG) combined with local and systemic antiglaucoma medications and miotic agents, as well as pars plana vitrectomy combined with endolaser photocoagulation or diode transscleral laser photocoagulation of the peripheral retina and/or ciliary body in patients with neovascular glaucoma in the presence of iris rubeosis and opaque optical media (hemophthalmos) [134, 152, 153].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: laser coagulating procedures in neovascular glaucoma are accompanied by a higher risk of postoperative hypotony.
3.2.2. Hypotensive treatment of neovascular glaucoma
It is recommended to prescribe local pharmacotherapy to all patients with neovascular glaucoma to reduce IOP [1, 2, 145, 134].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: the preferred therapy is treatment with drugs from the groups of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (local or systemic), topical beta-blockers, and sympathomimetics for glaucoma treatment . The use of prostaglandin analogues is not recommended due to the potential potentiation of the inflammatory response and low efficacy resulting from difficult access to the uveoscleral pathway through the fibrovascular membrane [1, 154, 145, 134].
3.2.3. Laser treatment of neovascular glaucoma
It is recommended to perform transscleral laser cyclocoagulation in neovascular glaucoma [155, 156].
Level of Evidence CLevel of Confidence 4Level of Clinical Recommendation Credibility – C (Level of Evidence Confidence – 4)
Comment:
Performing transscleral laser cyclophotocoagulation in neovascular glaucoma can lead to a higher level of hypotony than observed with cyclophotocoagulation in other types of glaucoma.
Currently, a standardized protocol for transscleral laser cyclophotocoagulation in neovascular glaucoma has not been developed; the long-term hypotensive efficacy of transscleral laser cyclophotocoagulation in neovascular glaucoma is 35-65% [157].
3.2.4. Surgical treatment of neovascular glaucoma
During long-term follow-up, the majority of glaucoma patients (up to 80%) require surgical intervention regardless of prior treatment [154].
It is recommended to perform trabeculectomy (sinustrabeculectomy) after the regression of new vessels, using antimetabolites and/or an antiglaucoma drainage device (collagen antiglaucoma drainage, resorbable antiglaucoma drainage) to prevent adhesion of the superficial scleral flap to the bed in patients with neovascular glaucoma when IOP compensation cannot be achieved with medical therapy [1, 145].
GGR CEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Evidence Level – 5)
Comment: The long-term hypotensive efficacy of trabeculectomy with antimetabolites in neovascular glaucoma is 52-67% [158-160].
A history of panretinal laser photocoagulation of the retina and/or intravitreal administration of VEGF/VEGFR (vascular endothelial growth factor) inhibitors (L01FG) is necessary for the regression of new vessels and suppression of pathological neovascularization, and allows increasing the long-term hypotensive efficacy of trabeculectomy up to 80% [161, 162].
It is recommended: implantation of tube drainage devices (glaucoma valve or glaucoma shunt***) diverting aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the equator of the eyeball as a primary or secondary intervention in patients with neovascular glaucoma [163, 164].
Level of Evidence CLevel of Confidence 4Level of Clinical Recommendation Credibility – C (Level of Evidence Confidence – 4)
Comment: The long-term hypotensive efficacy of tube shunt implantation in neovascular glaucoma is 29-79% [165, 166]. A history of panretinal laser photocoagulation of the retina and/or intravitreal administration of VEGF/VEGFR (vascular endothelial growth factor) inhibitors (L01FG) is necessary for the regression of new vessels and suppression of pathological neovascularization, and allows increasing the long-term hypotensive efficacy of tube shunt implantation in neovascular glaucoma.
3.3. Treatment of phlebohypertensive glaucoma, including medical, laser, and surgical treatment
Treatment of SGF should include therapy for the underlying somatic nosology, which is the cause of elevated venous pressure [1, 169]. And while spontaneous carotid-cavernous fistulas may resolve spontaneously or close after diagnostic angiography, in a number of other conditions curing the root cause may prove impossible; for instance, embolization of carotid-cavernous fistulas is risky and may be unsuccessful.
3.3.1. Medical treatment of phlebohypertensive glaucoma
It is recommended to prescribe local drug therapy to all patients with SGF in order to normalize IOP [1, 2, 172].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments:
The preferred hypotensive therapy in the initial stages of the disease is treatment with medicinal products from the groups of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (topical or systemic), topical beta-blockers, and sympathomimetics for glaucoma treatment [1]. The use of prostaglandin analogs is of low efficacy in the early stages due to the normal rate of aqueous humor outflow. However, with prolonged chronic IOP elevation, when it cannot be normalized after normalizing episcleral venous pressure, a delayed impairment of aqueous humor outflow may occur, in which prescribing prostaglandin analogs will be sufficiently effective [1, 2, 172].
A number of conditions, such as orbital varices, in the initial stages are not accompanied by a significant prolonged IOP elevation and resolve with systemic conservative therapy. In such cases, if elevated ophthalmotonus is present, its temporary correction is possible using drugs from the groups of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, topical beta-blockers, and sympathomimetics for glaucoma treatment [1, 2, 172].
3.3.2. Laser treatment of phlebohypertensive glaucoma
It is recommended to perform laser transscleral cyclocoagulation in patients with SGF when local hypotensive therapy is ineffective, the underlying cause of elevated venous pressure cannot be eliminated, and there is no prognosis for preserving visual functions [1].
GGR CEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Evidence Level – 5)
3.3.3. Surgical treatment of phlebohypertensive glaucoma
It is recommended to perform surgical treatment in patients with SGF when local hypotensive therapy is ineffective [1].
GGR CEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Evidence Level – 5)
Comment: Trabeculectomy (sinustrabeculectomy) or implantation of antiglaucoma drains (tubular drainage devices) may be the surgery of choice. During surgical treatment of patients with SGF, hypotonia, shallow anterior chamber syndrome, choroidal detachment, and suprachoroidal hemorrhage occur more frequently; therefore, it is recommended to use systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors before surgery, perform preventive sclerotomy, and maintain the anterior chamber volume using viscoelastic materials. When implanting tubular drainage devices, it is recommended to implant a glaucoma valve or glaucoma shunt***, diverting aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the equator of the eyeball) [1, 2, 3].
3.4. Treatment of phacogenic glaucomas
3.4.1. Treatment of phacotopic glaucoma, including medical, laser, and surgical treatment
Closure of the iridocorneal angle in lens subluxation or dislocation often does not respond to medical treatment.
It is recommended to remove the subluxated or anteriorly dislocated lens in patients when this is the cause of IOP elevation [173, 174, 176].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: posterior displacement of the lens without pupillary block by the vitreous body is not an emergency condition and should be considered as open-angle glaucoma. Lens removal should be performed in grade 2 and 3 subluxation or in complete lens dislocation according to the classification by N.P. Pashtayev (1986), upon the development of a pupillary block or open-angle phacotopic glaucoma [173, 174].
It is recommended to perform peripheral laser iridotomy upon the development of iridocorneal angle blockade due to lens dislocation for temporary IOP compensation, followed by lens removal [173, 174, 176].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform trabeculectomy (sinustrabeculectomy) using antimetabolites and/or an antiglaucoma drain (collagen antiglaucoma drain, resorbable antiglaucoma drain) when it is not possible to achieve a tolerant IOP level with local hypotensive therapy, or in case of progression of glaucomatous optic neuropathy [1-3].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
3.4.2. Treatment of phacomorphic glaucoma, including medical, laser, and surgical treatment
The goal of treatment for phacomorphic glaucoma is to lower IOP, open the iridocorneal angle, and prevent its re-closure [173, 174, 179, 180].
It is recommended to prescribe local drug therapy to all patients with phacomorphic glaucoma in order to reduce IOP [173-175, 182, 179, 180, 176].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment:
The preferred therapy is treatment with medications from the groups of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (topical or systemic), topical beta-blockers, and sympathomimetics for the management of glaucoma. In the event of an acute/subacute attack of secondary angle-closure glaucoma, systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are preferred, as topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors may worsen corneal edema. Prostaglandin analogs are effective only in patients with incomplete or partial angle closure. The use of miotics (from the group of antiglaucoma preparations and miotics, S01E) in the presence of a pupillary block may be accompanied by a certain hypotensive effect due to pulling the peripheral part of the iris away from the trabecular meshwork; however, in the presence of ciliary block or pronounced lens swelling, the use of pilocarpine** can lead to contraction of the circular portion of the ciliary muscle, which may result in anterior displacement of the lens and further angle closure [173, 174, 183, 175].
Prostaglandin analogs are effective in patients with partial angle closure [175]. Secondary angle closure due to drug-induced lens swelling generally responds to medical therapy and rarely requires surgical intervention. Lens swelling may resolve spontaneously after discontinuation of the offending drugs. However, in many cases, a filtering procedure and cataract extraction are necessary for long-term IOP control. Performing trabeculectomy without cataract surgery increases the risk of a flat anterior chamber and aqueous misdirection [170, 173, 175, 177].
It is recommended to perform peripheral laser iridotomy to eliminate potential components of pupillary block [173–175].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: if, after iridotomy, the IOP has decreased and gonioscopy shows that the iridocorneal angle has widened, pupillary block was likely the primary mechanism causing the IOP elevation. Residual angle closure after laser iridotomy can be eliminated using argon laser peripheral iridoplasty. If the IOP remains high and the angle is closed, the cause is lens swelling or anterior displacement, and the patient requires lens extraction.
It is recommended to perform lens extraction in all patients with a swelling cataract, even in the presence of high visual acuity [184, 173, 174, 182, 185, 180].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: cataract surgery in patients with phacomorphic glaucoma presents certain challenges. Corneal edema due to high IOP reduces the surgical view. A shallow anterior chamber and tension of the lens capsule can pose technical difficulties during capsulorhexis and be accompanied by trauma to the corneal endothelium. High preoperative IOP may increase the likelihood of choroidal hemorrhage during or after surgery. Extraction of a clear lens may be necessary in eyes with recurrent attacks of secondary angle closure or when medical and laser therapy fails [186–188].
3.4.3. Treatment of phacolytic glaucoma, including medical and surgical treatment
It is recommended to perform emergency cataract extraction in all patients with phacolytic glaucoma [203, 184, 204, 194, 205].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: preferred preoperative therapy is treatment with medications from the groups of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (topical or systemic), topical beta-blockers, and sympathomimetics for the management of glaucoma, as well as the use of topical corticosteroids (S01BA) [203].
It is recommended to remove all lens material from the anterior chamber of the eye, or perform posterior pars plana vitrectomy in cases of lens nucleus or cortical matter displacement into the vitreous body, in all patients with phacoanaphylactic uveitis, accompanied by prior and subsequent anti-inflammatory treatment using topical and systemic corticosteroids (S01BA, H02A) and, if necessary, IOP-lowering drugs (antiglaucoma preparations and miotics) [206, 189, 191, 197, 198].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: if lens remnants persist, topical corticosteroid therapy will not provide a significant anti-inflammatory effect in phacoanaphylactic uveitis and may lead to a steroid-induced increase in IOP [197, 198].
It is recommended to initiate treatment for phacogenic glaucoma with a phacolytic mechanism using medications from the groups of carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (topical or systemic), topical beta-blockers, and sympathomimetics for the management of glaucoma, as well as the use of topical corticosteroids (S01BA) [189–191, 196].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: therapy with topical corticosteroids (S01BA) is also recommended to control the inflammatory response. If there is a significant amount of cortical material, its surgical removal is necessary [199–202].
It is recommended to perform trabeculectomy (sinusotrabeculectomy) using antimetabolites and/or an antiglaucoma drainage device (collagen antiglaucoma drainage, absorbable antiglaucoma drainage) in cases where, after lens removal and anti-inflammatory treatment, it is not possible to achieve a target IOP level with topical hypotensive therapy, or in the case of progressive glaucomatous optic neuropathy [1–3].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
3.5. Treatment of drug-induced (steroid) glaucoma, including medical, laser, and surgical treatment
The management of clinically significant IOP elevation induced by corticosteroids and associated glaucoma is similar to the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
It is recommended to discontinue steroid therapy in patients with steroid ocular hypertension/glaucoma, if clinically feasible regarding the management of the underlying disease [1, 212, 207, 213, 209, 218, 216].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment:
In patients with deposited intraocular corticosteroids (S01BA) who do not respond to hypotensive therapy, surgical removal of the deposited implant is recommended. In patients with Cushing's syndrome, normalization of IOP is usually observed after excision of the corticosteroid-producing tumor or hyperplastic tissue. If topical corticosteroid therapy (S01BA) is necessary, it can be switched to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Transitioning from topical corticosteroid therapy (S01BA) to systemic therapy (H02A) may also reduce the ocular hypertensive effect. Patients requiring systemic corticosteroid therapy can be switched to immunosuppressive therapy [1, 212, 207, 213, 209, 218, 216].
It is recommended to prescribe topical medical therapy to all patients with steroid ocular hypertension/glaucoma in order to reduce IOP [1, 212, 207, 213, 209, 218, 216].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Preferred initial therapy consists of non-selective topical beta-blockers and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors [1, 207, 216].
The use of prostaglandin analogs has demonstrated high hypotensive efficacy in steroid glaucoma; however, their use may be limited by the presence of a local inflammatory disease that is the cause of corticosteroid therapy [1].
After initiating hypotensive therapy, tonometry should be performed every 2 weeks for the first month, monthly for 2–3 months, and every 3–6 months thereafter during long-term corticosteroid therapy. It is important to note that patients receiving a single intravitreal dose of triamcinolone should be monitored for several months, as some patients experience a significant increase in IOP more than 3 months after the injection [219].
It is recommended to perform laser trabeculoplasty (LTP) in patients with steroid ocular hypertension/glaucoma as an alternative strategy to medical therapy [220, 221].
Level of Evidence CReliability of Evidence 4Recommendation Strength Level – C (Evidence Reliability Level – 4)
It is recommended to perform trabeculectomy in patients with steroid glaucoma when medical and laser therapy is ineffective [1, 207, 216].
GGR CEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Evidence Level – 5)
3.6. Treatment of post-traumatic glaucoma
3.6.1. Treatment of post-traumatic glaucoma secondary to blunt eye trauma in the early period, including medical, laser, and surgical treatment
Medical treatment aims to normalize IOP, prevent secondary hemorrhage, and reduce the inflammatory response.
It is recommended for patients with traumatic hyphema admitted to a specialized inpatient unit to apply a protective eye shield, restrict activity (including reading), elevate the head of the bed to 30 degrees, provide pharmacological control of pain and vomiting, and treat any underlying coagulopathy [232, 235–237].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to prescribe topical medical therapy for patients with traumatic hyphema and uveitis in the presence of ocular hypertension [232, 235, 236].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment:
Preferred initial therapy consists of topical beta-blockers and carbonic anhydrase inhibitors [232].
The use of miotics (from the group of antiglaucoma preparations and miotics, S01E) and prostaglandin analogues is not recommended due to the potential exacerbation of the inflammatory response.
Systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are an alternative to topical hypotensive therapy in cases of uncontrolled IOP.
The use of mydriatic and cycloplegic agents (S01F) is recommended to relieve pain and prevent the formation of posterior synechiae [232, 238, 239].
The use of topical corticosteroids (S01BA) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (S01BC) can reduce the risk of recurrent hemorrhage, the severity of uveitis, and the formation of posterior synechiae [240, 232, 235, 241, 242, 239].
It is recommended to perform surgical anterior chamber washout in patients with grade III–IV traumatic hyphema lasting more than 10 days, corneal blood staining, and uncontrolled IOP despite medical therapy [235, 243, 238, 236].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform laser or surgical peripheral iridectomy in patients with traumatic hyphema when pupillary block is suspected and the iris cannot be repositioned during anterior chamber washout [238].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform trabeculectomy (sinustrabeculectomy) using antimetabolites and/or an antiglaucoma drainage device (collagen antiglaucoma drainage, absorbable antiglaucoma drainage) in patients with traumatic hyphema and uveitis when IOP cannot be controlled by medical therapy and anterior chamber washout [240, 238, 239, 279].
GGR CEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Evidence Level – 5)
3.6.2. Long-term management of post-traumatic glaucoma secondary to blunt eye trauma, including medical, laser, and surgical treatment
It is recommended to prescribe topical medical therapy to all patients with post-traumatic ocular hypertension/glaucoma associated with angle recession, ghost-cell, hemolytic, and hemosiderotic glaucoma to lower IOP [1, 3].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment:
Non-selective topical beta-blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, and sympathomimetics are the preferred starting therapy for glaucoma. The use of miotics (from the group of antiglaucoma preparations and miotics, S01E) and prostaglandin analogues is not recommended due to the potential exacerbation of the inflammatory response. Systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are an alternative to topical hypotensive therapy in cases of uncontrolled IOP [1-3].
It is recommended to perform surgical anterior chamber washout with removal of the blood source (vitrectomy in the presence of vitreous hemorrhage) in patients with ghost-cell, hemolytic, and hemosiderotic glaucoma with uncontrolled IOP despite medical therapy [259].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
It is recommended to perform trabeculectomy (sinustrabeculectomy) using antimetabolites and/or an antiglaucoma drainage device (collagen antiglaucoma drainage, absorbable antiglaucoma drainage) or implantation of tube shunt devices (glaucoma valve or glaucoma drainage device***) diverting aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the equator of the eyeball in patients with post-traumatic glaucoma associated with angle recession, ghost-cell, hemolytic, and hemosiderotic glaucoma when medical therapy is ineffective [260, 261].
Level of Evidence CReliability of Evidence 4Recommendation Strength Level – C (Evidence Reliability Level – 4)
3.6.3. Management of post-traumatic glaucoma secondary to open globe injury, including medical, laser, and surgical treatment
It is recommended to perform surgical closure of penetrating wounds with restoration of the integrity of ocular structures and membranes and removal of foreign bodies in all patients with penetrating eye injuries [263, 265, 225, 264].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: postoperative therapy involves the administration of topical antimicrobials (S01A), mydriatics and cycloplegics (S01F), corticosteroids (S01BA), and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (S01BC) [263, 265, 225, 264].
The principles of surgical treatment for open globe injuries aimed at normalizing IOP include: removal of a swelling traumatic cataract—performed during an acute attack of phacomorphic ocular hypertension refractory to conservative management; removal of the lens from the anterior chamber—performed in case of lens dislocation into the anterior chamber to prevent an acute attack of secondary ocular hypertension and loss of corneal endothelial cells; anterior chamber paracentesis—performed in total hyphema to evacuate blood and blood clots for the prevention or treatment of an acute attack of ocular hypertension. If hyphema recurs during this procedure, completion of surgery with anterior chamber tamponade using air or a viscoelastic agent may be used to prevent blood staining of the cornea (corneal blood staining).
It is recommended to prescribe topical medical therapy to all patients with post-traumatic ocular hypertension/glaucoma associated with penetrating eye injuries to lower IOP [265, 225, 233].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comment: non-selective topical beta-blockers, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, and sympathomimetics are the preferred therapy. The use of miotics (from clones of antiglaucoma preparations and miotics, S01E) and prostaglandin analogues is not recommended due to the potential exacerbation of the inflammatory response. Systemic carbonic anhydrase inhibitors are an alternative to topical hypotensive therapy in cases of uncontrolled IOP [265, 225, 233].
It is recommended to perform trabeculectomy (sinustrabeculectomy) using antimetabolites and/or an antiglaucoma drainage device (collagen antiglaucoma drainage, absorbable antiglaucoma drainage), or implantation of tube shunt devices (glaucoma valve or glaucoma drainage device***) diverting aqueous humor from the anterior chamber to the equator of the eyeball in patients with post-traumatic glaucoma associated with a penetrating eye injury when medical therapy is ineffective [225, 233, 279].
GGR CEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Evidence Level – 5)
3.7. Diet therapy, analgesia, and other treatment methods
There is no special diet for secondary glaucoma. Anesthesia methods are applied at the stage of laser or surgical treatment of secondary glaucoma and are not used as an independent therapy.
It is recommended to use local anesthesia (using topical anesthetic eye drops), supplemented if necessary by para- or retrobulbar injection of local anesthetics (S01H) (and combined anesthesia if indicated) prior to surgery for pain control and prevention of intraoperative complications [1-3, 19].
LeveL CLevel of evidence reliability – 5
Alternative treatment strategies for glaucomatous optic neuropathy (neuroprotection) are a subject of research and discussion [266]. According to multicenter studies (CNTGS, 1998; AGIS, 2000; EMGT, 2002; OHTS, 2002), guaranteeing long-term complete stabilization of the glaucomatous process is extremely difficult even with strict adherence to medical recommendations. No studies have been conducted on the feasibility of neuroprotection in uveitic glaucoma.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
Medical rehabilitation is provided on a scheduled basis within the framework of primary health care and specialized, including high-tech, medical care.
It is recommended to carry out medical rehabilitation for patients with secondary glaucoma to preserve visual functions and address the feasibility of reconstructive optical surgeries or vitreoretinal interventions as indicated [18, 2].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that all patients with secondary glaucoma undergo outpatient follow-up by an ophthalmologist for at least 1 month after surgery to monitor IOP levels and functional parameters, and to prevent and treat potential postoperative complications [18, 2].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: The frequency of ophthalmologic examinations and the scope of examinations and manipulations after surgery are determined individually. Rehabilitation improves vision-related quality of life in patients with secondary glaucoma. A multidisciplinary approach increases the efficacy of treatment and rehabilitation in these patients.
It is recommended to perform eyeball massage with individually calculated frequency and duration in all patients with secondary glaucoma after antiglaucoma surgery when signs of scarring of newly created outflow pathways are detected, in order to restore aqueous humor outflow and lower IOP. Procedures are performed in treatment rooms. The duration is determined individually, but if 3–4 procedures are ineffective, alternative methods of lowering IOP should be considered [267].]
GCR CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to perform revision (needling) of the filtering bleb with an individually calculated frequency in all patients with secondary glaucoma after antiglaucoma surgery if signs of scarring of the newly created outflow pathways are detected, in order to restore aqueous humor passage and reduce IOP. The procedures are performed in treatment rooms or operating rooms. The duration is determined individually; however, if 3–4 procedures are ineffective, other methods of lowering IOP should be considered [267].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
It is recommended to conduct an ophthalmologist's consultation (B01.029.001, B01.029.002) for patients with secondary glaucoma for the early detection of elevated IOP during an exacerbation of a systemic disease or traumatic injury [3, 2, 37].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: in patients receiving medical therapy, the efficacy and any side effects of the treatment are evaluated; changes and new prescriptions made by other specialists for systemic indications that may affect glaucoma treatment are identified; compliance with the regimen of hypotensive glaucoma therapy is monitored. In patients after surgical interventions, the functional and hypotensive effects of the surgery are assessed, postoperative treatment (antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, reparative, etc.) is adjusted, and other ophthalmological pathology is monitored and treated. In patients with a filtering bleb, its height, width, presence of wall thinning, vascularization, encapsulation, active filtration, and infection must be evaluated.
Each patient visit is accompanied by an assessment of the patient's subjective well-being, visual functions (difficulties with driving, impaired dark adaptation, contrast sensitivity problems, small print reading, and distance estimation), quality of life, and treatment adherence.
The frequency of examinations depends on the etiology, severity, and potential course of the systemic inflammatory process or trauma, the presence and risk of complications, and the ongoing treatment. After achieving the target IOP, an ophthalmological examination is performed 1 time per month for 3 months, then, if the condition is stable, 1 time every 3 months for a year, and thereafter every 6 months. After discontinuing systemic therapy, monitoring should be performed at least 1 time every 3 months for at least 3 years, as most recurrences of the inflammatory process are observed during this period.
6. Organization of Medical Care
Primary specialized health care for secondary glaucoma is provided by an ophthalmologist in the outpatient department of a medical organization.
Treatment (laser interventions, conservative medical therapy, or physiotherapy) is carried out in outpatient settings, day-care settings, or inpatient settings.
Indications for hospitalization of patients with secondary glaucoma in a medical organization are:
Planned (elective):
the need for surgical treatment of secondary glaucoma and/or laser treatment and/or medical treatment to compensate for elevated IOP when treatment cannot be performed in outpatient or day-care settings;
conducting an in-depth examination, medical and/or laser treatment (if they cannot be performed in outpatient or day-care settings).
Emergency:
the need for surgical treatment of secondary glaucoma and/or laser treatment and/or medical treatment in the presence of a high ("c") level of intraocular pressure and the inability to perform treatment in outpatient or day-care settings when there is a threat of rapid loss of visual functions.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:
completion of a course of treatment or one of the stages of specialized, including high-tech, medical care in a 24-hour or day hospital in the absence of treatment complications requiring drug correction and/or medical interventions in a hospital setting (including the achieved normalization of IOP levels or relief of pain syndrome in absolute painful glaucoma);
refusal of the patient or their legal representative from specialized, including high-tech, medical care in a 24-hour or day hospital, established by a medical organization's conciliar decision, in the absence of complications of the underlying disease and/or treatment requiring drug correction and/or medical interventions in a hospital setting;
the need to transfer the patient to another medical organization according to the relevant medical profile. The conclusion on the feasibility of transferring the patient to a specialized medical organization is made after a preliminary consultation based on the provided medical documents and/or a preliminary examination of the patient by specialist doctors of the medical organization to which the transfer is planned.
7. Additional Information
The prognosis is largely determined by the etiopathogenetic form of the disease. Predictors of a good functional prognosis are a mild course of the inflammatory process in the eye, as well as the timely administration of local and systemic therapy.
Predictors of a poor functional prognosis are: a severe course or persistent activity and the development of uveitis complications, resistance to ongoing therapy, and a prolonged course of the disease.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
Quality criteria are used to assess the timeliness of medical care provision, the correctness of the choice of prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods, and the degree to which the planned outcome is achieved. Quality criteria are applied by disease (condition) groups and by conditions of medical care provision.
Table 10.1 – Quality assessment criteria for primary health care provided to adults with secondary glaucoma
№ | Criteria quality | Evaluation of compliance |
|---|---|---|
1. | Initial ophthalmologist examination (evaluation, consultation) | Yes/No |
2. | Ocular biomicroscopy performed | Yes/No |
3. | Tonometry performed | Yes/No |
4. | Visometry was performed | Yes/No |
5. | Static perimetry and/or computerized perimetry performed | Yes/No |
6. | Fundus biomicroscopy or ophthalmoscopy performed | Yes/No |
7. | Gonioscopy performed | Yes/No |
8. | Prescription of antiglaucoma drugs and miotics (depending on medical indications and in the absence of contraindications) | Yes/No |
Table 10.2 – Quality assessment criteria for specialized medical care provided to adults with secondary glaucoma
№ | Criteria quality | Evaluation of compliance |
|---|---|---|
1. | Tonometry performed | Yes/No |
2. | Visometry was performed | Yes/No |
3. | Computerized perimetry performed | Yes/No |
4. | Fundus biomicroscopy or ophthalmoscopy performed | Yes/No |
5. | Ocular biomicroscopy performed | Yes/No |
6. | Gonioscopy performed | Yes/No |
7. | Treatment with antiglaucoma drugs and miotics and/or laser treatment and/or surgical treatment administered (depending on medical indications and in the absence of contraindications) | Yes/No |
References
Show references
Shaarawy T.M., Sherwood M.B., Hitchings R.A., Crowston J.G. Glaucoma: medical diagnosis and therapy, 2-nd (Vol.1). London: Elsevier, 2015: 1201.
National Guidelines for Glaucoma for Practitioners. 4th ed., rev. and supp. / Ed. by E.A. Egorov, V.P. Erichev. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2019: 384.
Basic and Clinical Science Course. Section 10. Glaucoma / Ed. C.A. Girkin. San Francisco: AAO, 2018: 262.
Charteris D.G., Barton K., McCartney A.C., Lightman S.L. CD4+ lymphocyte involvement in ocular Behcet's disease. Autoimmunity 1992; 12(3): 201-6.
Clark A.F., Wilson K., de Kater A.W., Allingham R.R., McCartney M.D. Dexamethasone-induced ocular hypertension in perfusion-cultured human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995; 36(2): 478-89.
Ladas J.G., Yu F., Loo R., Davis J.L., Coleman A.L., Levinson R.D., et al. Relationship between aqueous humor protein level and outflow facility in patients with uveitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42(11): 2584-8.
Planck S.R., Huang X.N., Robertson J.E., Rosenbaum J.T. Cytokine mRNA levels in rat ocular tissues after systemic endotoxin treatment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994; 35(3): 924-30.
Herbert H.M., Viswanathan A., Jackson H., Lightman S.L. Risk factors for elevated intraocular pressure in uveitis. J Glaucoma 2004; 13(2): 96-9.
Merayo-Lloves J., Power W.J., Rodriguez A., Pedroza-Seres M., Foster C.S. Secondary glaucoma in patients with uveitis. Ophthalmologica 1999; 213(5): 300-4.
Takahashi T., Ohtani S., Miyata K., Miyata N., Shirato S., Mochizuki M. A clinical evaluation of uveitis-associated secondary glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2002; 46(5): 556-62.
Neri P., Azuara-Blanco A., Forrester J.V. Incidence of glaucoma in patients with uveitis. J Glaucoma 2004; 13(6): 461-5.
de Boer J., Wulffraat N., Rothova A. Visual loss in uveitis of childhood. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87(7): 879-84.
Kanski J.J., Shun-Shin G.A. Systemic uveitis syndromes in childhood: an analysis of 340 cases. Ophthalmology 1984; 91(10): 1247-52.
Barton K., Pavesio C.E., Towler H.M., Lightman S. Uveitis presenting de novo in the elderly. Eye (Lond) 1994; 8 ( Pt 3)(288-91.
Panek W.C., Holland G.N., Lee D.A., Christensen R.E. Glaucoma in patients with uveitis. Br J Ophthalmol 1990; 74(4): 223-7.
Nesterov A.P., Bunin A.Ya. On the new classification of primary glaucoma. Annals of Ophthalmology. 1977; 5; 38-42.
Foster P.J., Buhrmann R., Quigley H.A., Johnson G.J. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86(2): 238-42.
Glaucoma: diagnosis and management. Methods, evidence and recommendations. London: NICE, 2017: 324.
International Council of Ophthalmology Guidelines for Glaucoma Eye Care / ed. N. Gupta et al., ICO, San Francisco, 2015:22
Panova I.E., Drozdova E.A., Avdeeva O.N. Chapter 28. Uveitis. In: Ophthalmology: National Guidelines / ed. by S.E. Avetisov, E.A. Egorov, L.K. Moshetova, V.V. Neroev, Kh.P. Takhchidi. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2018. - P. 507-560.
Jabs D.A., Nussenblatt R.B., Rosenbaum J.T., Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working G. Standardization of uveitis nomenclature for reporting clinical data. Results of the First International Workshop. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140(3): 509-16.
Foster C., Vitale A. Diagnosis and Treatment of Uveitis. New Delhi, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2nd ed, 2013. – 1276 p.
Gupta A. Herbort C.P., Khairallah M. Uveitis. Text and Imaging. New Delhi, 2009. – 830 p.
Nussenblatt R.B., Whitcup S.M. Uveitis: fundamentals and clinical practice, 4rd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby, 2010. – 433 p.
Katsnelson L.A., Tankovsky V.E. Uveitis. M.: 4th Branch of Voenizdat, 2003. – 286 p.
Panova I.E., Drozdova E.A. Uveitis: A Guide for Physicians. M.: Medical Information Agency Publishing House LLC, 2014. – 144 p.
Ustinova E.I. Endogenous Uveitis (Selected Lectures for Ophthalmologists). St. Petersburg: Eco-Vector, 2017. – 202 p.
Astakhov Yu.S., Kuznetsova T.I., Khripun K.V., Konenkova Ya.S., Belozerova E.V. Prospects for diagnosis and treatment efficacy of Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada disease. Ophthalmological Vedomosti. 2014; 7 (3): 84-92 (https://doi.org/10.17816/OV2014384-92).
Boyd S.R., Young S., Lightman S. Immunopathology of the noninfectious posterior and intermediate uveitides. Surv Ophthalmol 2001; 46(3): 209-33.
de Smet M.D., Taylor S.R., Bodaghi B., Miserocchi E., Murray P.I., Pleyer U., et al. Understanding uveitis: the impact of research on visual outcomes. Prog Retin Eye Res 2011; 30(6): 452-70.
Egorov E.A., Nesterov A.P. Primary open-angle glaucoma / in: Ophthalmology. National Guidelines ed. by S.E. Avetisov, E.A. Egorov, L.K. Moshetova, Kh.P. Takhchidi. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2018: 713-726.
Branson S.V., McClafferty B.R., Kurup S.K. Vitrectomy for Epiretinal Membranes and Macular Holes in Uveitis Patients. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2017; 33(4): 298-303.
Grodum K., Heijl A., Bengtsson B. Refractive error and glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001; 79(6): 560-6.
Mitchell P., Hourihan F., Sandbach J., Wang J.J. The relationship between glaucoma and myopia: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology 1999; 106(10): 2010-5.
Perera S.A., Wong T.Y., Tay W.T., Foster P.J., Saw S.M., Aung T. Refractive error, axial dimensions, and primary open-angle glaucoma: the Singapore Malay Eye Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2010; 128(7): 900-5.
The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration.The AGIS Investigators. Am J Ophthalmol 2000; 130(4): 429-40.
Nesterov A.P. Glaucoma. M.: Medical Information Agency, 2008: 360.
Antonov A.A., Karlova E.V., Brezhnev A.Yu., Dorofeev D.A. Current state of ophthalmotonometry. Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(6):100-107.
Balashevich L.I., Kachanov A.B., Nikulin S.A. et al. The effect of corneal thickness on pneumotonometric indicators of intraocular pressure. Ophthalmic Surgery. 2005; 1: 31-33.
Cook J.A., Botello A.P., Elders A., Fathi Ali A., Azuara-Blanco A., Fraser C., et al. Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmology 2012; 119(8): 1552-7.
Quigley H.A., Dunkelberger G.R., Green W.R. Retinal ganglion cell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1989; 107(5): 453-64.
Sagri D., Losche C.C., Bestges B.B., Krummenauer F. Is There Really Agreement between Rebound and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry Methods? Results of a Systematic Review of the Period 01/2005 to 08/2014. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2015; 232(7): 850-7.
Abysheva L.D., Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S. et al. Optimal characteristics of the upper limit of ophthalmotonus in patients with advanced primary open-angle glaucoma from the perspective of evidence-based medicine. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2015; 3: 111-123.
Bengtsson B., Leske M.C., Hyman L., Heijl A., Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial G. Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology 2007; 114(2): 205-9.
Kniestedt C., Punjabi O., Lin S., Stamper R.L. Tonometry through the ages. Surv Ophthalmol 2008; 53(6): 568-91.
Konstas A.G., Kahook M.Y., Araie M., Katsanos A., Quaranta L., Rossetti L., et al. Diurnal and 24-h Intraocular Pressures in Glaucoma: Monitoring Strategies and Impact on Prognosis and Treatment. Adv Ther 2018; 35(11): 1775-804.
Prata T.S., De Moraes C.G., Kanadani F.N., Ritch R., Paranhos A., Jr. Posture-induced intraocular pressure changes: considerations regarding body position in glaucoma patients. Surv Ophthalmol 2010; 55(5): 445-53.
Sacca S.C., Rolando M., Marletta A., Macri A., Cerqueti P., Ciurlo G. Fluctuations of intraocular pressure during the day in open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma and normal subjects. Ophthalmologica 1998; 212(2): 115-9.
European Glaucoma Society Terminology and Guidelines for Glaucoma (5th Edition). Savona: PubliComm, 2020: 172.
Congdon N.G., Spaeth G.L., Augsburger J., Klancnik J., Jr., Patel K., Hunter D.G. A proposed simple method for measurement in the anterior chamber angle: biometric gonioscopy. Ophthalmology 1999; 106(11): 2161-7.
Alward W.L.M., Longmuir R.A. Atlas of Gonioscopy (trans. from English) / ed. by T.V. Sokolovskaya. M.: "GEOTAR-Media", 2010: 120.
Shulpina N.B. Biomicroscopy of the Eye. M.: Meditsina. 1974: 264.
Spaeth G.L. The normal development of the human anterior chamber angle: a new system of descriptive grading. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962) 1971; 91(709-39.
Gonioscopy anatomy of the angle of the anterior chamber of the eye. In. SRe, ed. In: Shaffer R.N. Stereoscopic manual of gonioscopy. St. Louis, Mosby, 1962: 92.
Sakata L.M., Lavanya R., Friedman D.S., Aung H.T., Gao H., Kumar R.S., et al. Comparison of gonioscopy and anterior segment ocular coherence tomography in detecting angle closure in different quadrants of the anterior chamber angle. Ophthalmology 2008; 115(5): 769-74.
Diagnosis of Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Consensus Series - 10 / Ed. R.N. Weinreb., D. Garway-Heath, C. Leung, F. Medeiros, J. Liebmann. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications, 2017: 234.
Jonas J.B., Gusek G.C., Naumann G.O. Optic disc, cup and neuroretinal rim size, configuration and correlations in normal eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1988; 29(7): 1151-8.
Morgan J.E., Bourtsoukli I., Rajkumar K.N., Ansari E., Cunliffe I.A., North R.V., et al. The accuracy of the inferior>superior>nasal>temporal neuroretinal rim area rule for diagnosing glaucomatous optic disc damage. Ophthalmology 2012; 119(4): 723-30.
Glaucoma Imaging / Eds. Iester M., Garway-Heath D., Lemij H. Savona: PubliComm, 2017: 144.
Egorov E.A. Photo- and stereophotographic methods for studying the fundus. Military Medical Journal. 1977; 5: 46-47.
Kuroedov A.V., Gorodnichiy V.V., Ogorodnikova V.Yu. et al. Ophthalmoscopic characteristics of changes in the optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer in glaucoma (guidelines for physicians). M.: "Publishing House 'Stolichny Business'", 2011: 48.
Harizman N., Oliveira C., Chiang A., Tello C., Marmor M., Ritch R., et al. The ISNT rule and differentiation of normal from glaucomatous eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 2006; 124(11): 1579-83.
Ernest P.J., Viechtbauer W., Schouten J.S., Beckers H.J., Hendrikse F., Prins M.H., et al. The influence of the assessment method on the incidence of visual field progression in glaucoma: a network meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol 2012; 90(1): 10-9.
Yanagisawa M., Murata H., Matsuura M., Fujino Y., Hirasawa K., Asaoka R. Investigating the structure-function relationship using Goldmann V standard automated perimetry where glaucomatous damage is advanced. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2019; 39(6): 441-50.
Intraocular Pressure. Consensus Series - 4. / Ed. R.N. Weinreb, J.D. Brandt, D. Garway-Heath, F. Medeiros. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications, 2007: 128.
Avetisov S.E., Bubnova I.A., Antonov A.A. Biomechanical properties of the cornea: clinical significance, research methods, possibilities of systematizing approaches to study. Annals of Ophthalmology. 2010; 126(6): 3-7.
Belovay G.W., Goldberg I. The thick and thin of the central corneal thickness in glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 2018; 32(5): 915-23.
Doughty M.J., Zaman M.L. Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach. Surv Ophthalmol 2000; 44(5): 367-408.
Drozdova E.A., Ilyinskaya E.V. Diagnostic capabilities of eye tunic examination in uveitis. Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan. 2018; Vol. 1. No. 1(73):51-54.
Kansal V., Armstrong J.J., Pintwala R., Hutnik C. Optical coherence tomography for glaucoma diagnosis: An evidence based meta-analysis. PLoS One 2018; 13(1): e0190621.
Regatieri C.V., Alwassia A., Zhang J.Y., Vora R., Duker J.S. Use of optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis and management of uveitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2012; 52(4): 33-43.
The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 126(4): 498-505.
Avdeev R.V., Alexandrov A.S., Bakunina N.A. et al. Comparison of treatment regimens in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma with disease progression characteristics. Part 1. Status of ophthalmotonus indicators. National Journal of Glaucoma. 2018; 17(1): 14-28.
Heijl A., Leske M.C., Bengtsson B., Hyman L., Bengtsson B., Hussein M., et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120(10): 1268-79.
Lichter P.R., Musch D.C., Gillespie B.W., Guire K.E., Janz N.K., Wren P.A., et al. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology 2001; 108(11): 1943-53.
Leske M.C., Wu S.Y., Hennis A., Honkanen R., Nemesure B., Group B.E.S. Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma: the Barbados Eye Studies. Ophthalmology 2008; 115(1): 85-93.
Chauhan B.C., Mikelberg F.S., Artes P.H., Balazsi A.G., LeBlanc R.P., Lesk M.R., et al. Canadian Glaucoma Study: 3. Impact of risk factors and intraocular pressure reduction on the rates of visual field change. Arch Ophthalmol 2010; 128(10): 1249-55.
Drance S., Anderson D.R., Schulzer M., Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study G. Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 131(6): 699-708.
Kobelt G. Comparative data for all countries. In: Primary open-angle glaucoma. Differ-ences in international treatment patterns and costs. / Eds. Jönsson B., Krieglstein G. Oxford, England: ISIS Medical Media, 1998: 116-126.
Diaconita V., Quinn M., Jamal D., Dishan B., Malvankar-Mehta M.S., Hutnik C. Washout Duration of Prostaglandin Analogues: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Ophthalmol 2018; 2018(3190684.
Musch D.C., Gillespie B.W., Niziol L.M., Lichter P.R., Varma R., Group C.S. Intraocular pressure control and long-term visual field loss in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. Ophthalmology 2011; 118(9): 1766-73.
Chiba T., Kashiwagi K., Chiba N., Tsukahara S. Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory ophthalmic solution on intraocular pressure reduction by latanoprost in patients with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 2006; 90(3): 314-7.
Kashiwagi K., Tsukahara S. Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory ophthalmic solution on intraocular pressure reduction by latanoprost. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87(3): 297-301.
Kiuchi Y., Okada K., Ito N., Hayashida Y., Fukui K., Ohnishi T., et al. Effect of a single drop of latanoprost on intraocular pressure and blood-aqueous barrier permeability in patients with uveitis. Kobe J Med Sci 2002; 48(5-6): 153-9.
Fechtner R.D., Khouri A.S., Zimmerman T.J., Bullock J., Feldman R., Kulkarni P., et al. Anterior uveitis associated with latanoprost. Am J Ophthalmol 1998; 126(1): 37-41.
Schumer R.A., Camras C.B., Mandahl A.K. Putative side effects of prostaglandin analogs. Surv Ophthalmol 2002; 47 Suppl 1(S219.
Smith S.L., Pruitt C.A., Sine C.S., Hudgins A.C., Stewart W.C. Latanoprost 0.005% and anterior segment uveitis. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999; 77(6): 668-72.
Ekatomatis P. Herpes simplex dendritic keratitis after treatment with latanoprost for primary open angle glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85(8): 1008-9.
Kaufman H.E., Varnell E.D., Toshida H., Kanai A., Thompson H.W., Bazan N.G. Effects of topical unoprostone and latanoprost on acute and recurrent herpetic keratitis in the rabbit. Am J Ophthalmol 2001; 131(5): 643-6.
Wand M., Gilbert C.M., Liesegang T.J. Latanoprost and herpes simplex keratitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 127(5): 602-4.
Arcieri E.S., Santana A., Rocha F.N., Guapo G.L., Costa V.P. Blood-aqueous barrier changes after the use of prostaglandin analogues in patients with pseudophakia and aphakia: a 6-month randomized trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2005; 123(2): 186-92.
Schuman J.S. Effects of systemic beta-blocker therapy on the efficacy and safety of topical brimonidine and timolol. Brimonidine Study Groups 1 and 2. Ophthalmology 2000; 107(6): 1171-7.
van der Valk R., Webers C.A., Schouten J.S., Zeegers M.P., Hendrikse F., Prins M.H. Intraocular pressure-lowering effects of all commonly used glaucoma drugs: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Ophthalmology 2005; 112(7): 1177-85.
Erb C. Glaucoma and Dry Eye. Bremen: UNI-MED Verlag AG, 2012: 102.
Brzhesky V.V. Glaucoma and dry eye syndrome. Moscow: OOO “Company BORGES”, 2018: 228. (In Russ.)
Erb C., Lanzl I., Seidova S.F., Kimmich F. Preservative-free tafluprost 0.0015% in the treatment of patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Adv Ther 2011; 28(7): 575-85.
Cheng J.W., Li Y., Wei R.L. Systematic review of intraocular pressure-lowering effects of adjunctive medications added to latanoprost. Ophthalmic Res 2009; 42(2): 99-105.
Liu A.W., Gan L.Y., Yao X., Zhou J. Long-term assessment of prostaglandin analogs and timolol fixed combinations vs prostaglandin analogs monotherapy. Int J Ophthalmol 2016; 9(5): 750-6.
Liu Y., Zhao J., Zhong X., Wei Q., Huang Y. Efficacy and Safety of Brinzolamide as Add-On to Prostaglandin Analogues or beta-Blocker for Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Pharmacol 2019; 10(679.
Xing Y., Jiang F.G., Li T. Fixed combination of latanoprost and timolol vs the individual components for primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Ophthalmol 2014; 7(5): 879-90.
Cheng J.W., Cheng S.W., Gao L.D., Lu G.C., Wei R.L. Intraocular pressure-lowering effects of commonly used fixed-combination drugs with timolol: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2012; 7(9): e45079.
Kuroedov A.V., Brezhnev A.Yu., Lovpache D.N., et al. Feasibility of using differentiated ("stepwise") starting approaches to the treatment of patients with different stages of glaucoma. National Journal of Glaucoma. 2018;17(4):27-54. (In Russ.)
Olthoff C.M., Schouten J.S., van de Borne B.W., Webers C.A. Noncompliance with ocular hypotensive treatment in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension an evidence-based review. Ophthalmology 2005; 112(6): 953-61.
Medical Treatment of Glaucoma. WGA Consensus Series - 7. / Eds. Weinreb R., Makoto A., Susanna R., Goldberg I., Migdal C., Liebmann J. Kugler Publications, 2010: 309.
Ho J.D., Hu C.C., Lin H.C. Antiglaucoma medications during pregnancy and the risk of low birth weight: a population-based study. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93(10): 1283-6.
Murphy C.C., Burnett C.A., Spry P.G., Broadway D.C., Diamond J.P. A two centre study of the dose-response relation for transscleral diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in refractory glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87(10): 1252-7.
Williams I.M., Neerukonda V.K., Stagner A.M. The Histopathology of Two Eyes Enucleated after Continuous Transscleral and Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation for Refractory Secondary Glaucoma. Ocul Oncol Pathol 2022; 8(2): 93-9.
Xia J.L., Ertel M.K., Reddy A.K., Palestine A.G., Stanley A.J., Capitena Young C.E., et al. Outcomes of Micropulse Transscleral Cyclophotocoagulation in Uveitic Glaucoma. Ophthalmol Ther 2024.
Neroev V.V., Kiseleva O.A., Bessmertny A.M. Main results of the multicenter study of epidemiological features of primary open-angle glaucoma in the Russian Federation. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2013; 6(3): 4-7. (In Russ.)
Buck's 2019 ICD-10-CM Physician Edition E-Book, 1st Ed. New York: Saunders, 2019: 1600.
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10). WHO Version for; 2016. URL: https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en#/H40-H42 (accessed December 25, 2019).
Broadway D.C., Bates A.K., Lightman S.L., Grierson I., Hitchings R.A. The importance of cellular changes in the conjunctiva of patients with uveitic glaucoma undergoing trabeculectomy. Eye (Lond) 1993; 7 ( Pt 4)(495-501.
Broadway D.C., Grierson I., Sturmer J., Hitchings R.A. Reversal of topical antiglaucoma medication effects on the conjunctiva. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114(3): 262-7.
Glaucoma Surgery. Consensus - 11 / Eds. Weinreb R.N., Ramulu P., Topouzis F., Park K.H., Mansouri K., Lerner S.F. Amsterdam: Kugler Publications, 2019: 512.
Razeghinejad M.R., Fudemberg S.J., Spaeth G.L. The changing conceptual basis of trabeculectomy: a review of past and current surgical techniques. Surv Ophthalmol 2012; 57(1): 1-25.
Ceballos E.M., Beck A.D., Lynn M.J. Trabeculectomy with antiproliferative agents in uveitic glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2002; 11(3): 189-96.
Prata J.A., Jr., Neves R.A., Minckler D.S., Mermoud A., Heuer D.K. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in glaucoma associated with uveitis. Ophthalmic Surg 1994; 25(9): 616-20.
Stavrou P., Murray P.I. Long-term follow-up of trabeculectomy without antimetabolites in patients with uveitis. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 128(4): 434-9.
Towler H.M., Bates A.K., Broadway D.C., Lightman S. Primary trabeculectomy with 5-fluorouracil for glaucoma secondary to uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 1995; 3(3): 163-70.
Wright M.M., McGehee R.F., Pederson J.E. Intraoperative mitomycin-C for glaucoma associated with ocular inflammation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1997; 28(5): 370-6.
Armstrong J.J., Denstedt J.T., Trelford C.B., Li E.A., Hutnik C.M.L. Differential effects of dexamethasone and indomethacin on Tenon's capsule fibroblasts: Implications for glaucoma surgery. Exp Eye Res 2019; 182(65-73).
Cabourne E., Clarke J.C., Schlottmann P.G., Evans J.R. Mitomycin C versus 5-Fluorouracil for wound healing in glaucoma surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 11): CD006259.
Leung D.Y., Tham C.C. Management of bleb complications after trabeculectomy. Semin Ophthalmol 2013; 28(3): 144-56.
Masoumpour M.B., Nowroozzadeh M.H., Razeghinejad M.R. Current and Future Techniques in Wound Healing Modulation after Glaucoma Filtering Surgeries. Open Ophthalmol J 2016; 10(68-85.
Chen H.J., Lin C., Lee C.H., Chen Y.H. Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Combined with Mitomycin C or 5-Fluorouracil in Primary Trabeculectomy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Ophthalmic Res 2018; 59(3): 155-63.
Cheng J.W., Cheng S.W., Wei R.L., Lu G.C. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for control of wound healing in glaucoma surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 1): CD009782.
Petrov S.Yu. Modern concept of combating excessive scarring after filtering glaucoma surgery. Anti-inflammatory drugs and new trends. Ophthalmology. 2017;14(2): 99–105. (In Russ.)
Alekseev V.N., Levko M.A., Hamed S.M., Essam T. Surgical treatment of refractory glaucoma. Ophthalmological Vedomosti. 2011; 4(3): 65-69. (In Russ.)
Alekseev I.B., Proshina O.I., Shormaz I.N., et al. Results of surgical treatment of open-angle glaucoma in patients with aphakia. Practical Medicine. 2017; 1(9) (110): 127-130. (In Russ.)
Petrov S.Yu., Antonov A.A., Makarova A.S., et al. Possibilities of prolonging the hypotensive effect of trabeculectomy. Vestn. Oftalmol. 2015;131(1):75-81. (In Russ.)
Park I.K., Chun Y.S., Kim K.G., Yang H.K., Hwang J.M. New clinical grading scales and objective measurement for conjunctival injection. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54(8): 5249-57.
Araujo S.V., Spaeth G.L., Roth S.M., Starita R.J. A ten-year follow-up on a prospective, randomized trial of postoperative corticosteroids after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology 1995; 102(12): 1753-9.
Chen P.P., Weaver Y.K., Budenz D.L., Feuer W.J., Parrish R.K., 2nd. Trabeculectomy function after cataract extraction. Ophthalmology 1998; 105(10): 1928-35.
Fedoruk N.A. Modern views on the pathogenesis and treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Annals of Ophthalmology. 2024; 140(3): 110-6. (In Russ.)
John T., Sassani J.W., Eagle R.C., Jr. The myofibroblastic component of rubeosis iridis. Ophthalmology 1983; 90(6): 721-8.
Detorakis E.T., Engstrom R.E., Jr., Wallace R., Straatsma B.R. Iris and anterior chamber angle neovascularization after iodine 125 brachytherapy for uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology 2005; 112(3): 505-10.
Egbert P.R., Donaldson S.S., Moazed K., Rosenthal A.R. Visual results and ocular complications following radiotherapy for retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol 1978; 96(10): 1826-30.
Hirasawa N., Tsuji H., Ishikawa H., Koyama-Ito H., Kamada T., Mizoe J.E., et al. Risk factors for neovascular glaucoma after carbon ion radiotherapy of choroidal melanoma using dose-volume histogram analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67(2): 538-43.
Matsui N., Kamao T., Azumi A. Case of metastatic intraocular malignant lymphoma with neovascular glaucoma. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 2005; 109(7): 434-9.
Yahia S.B., Touffahi S.A., Zeghidi H., Zaouali S., Khairallah M. Ocular neovascularization in a patient with Fanconi anemia. Can J Ophthalmol 2006; 41(6): 778-9.
Telander D.G., Holland G.N., Wax M.B., Van Gelder R.N. Rubeosis and anterior segment ischemia associated with systemic cryoglobulinemia. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142(4): 689-90.
Mayer J., Brouillette G., Corriveau L.A. Sarcoidosis and rubeosis iridis. Can J Ophthalmol 1983; 18(4): 197-8.
Mocanu C., Barascu D., Marinescu F., Lacrateanu M., Iliusi F., Simionescu C. Neovascular glaucoma - retrospective study. Oftalmologia 2005; 49(4): 58-65.
Vancea P.P., Abu-Taleb A. Current trends in neovascular glaucoma treatment. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2005; 109(2): 264-8.
Lipatov D.V. Diabetic glaucoma. Moscow: Medical Information Agency; 2021. (In Russ.)
Detry-Morel M. Neovascular glaucoma in the diabetic patient. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 1995; 256(133-41.
Hayreh S.S., Klugman M.R., Podhajsky P., Servais G.E., Perkins E.S. Argon laser panretinal photocoagulation in ischemic central retinal vein occlusion. A 10-year prospective study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1990; 228(4): 281-96.
Davidorf F.H., Mouser J.G., Derick R.J. Rapid improvement of rubeosis iridis from a single bevacizumab (Avastin) injection. Retina 2006; 26(3): 354-6.
Iliev M.E., Domig D., Wolf-Schnurrbursch U., Wolf S., Sarra G.M. Intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142(6): 1054-6.
Oshima Y., Sakaguchi H., Gomi F., Tano Y. Regression of iris neovascularization after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142(1): 155-8.
Wakabayashi T., Oshima Y., Sakaguchi H., Ikuno Y., Miki A., Gomi F., et al. Intravitreal bevacizumab to treat iris neovascularization and neovascular glaucoma secondary to ischemic retinal diseases in 41 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology 2008; 115(9): 1571-80, 80 e1-3.
Bartz-Schmidt K.U., Thumann G., Psichias A., Krieglstein G.K., Heimann K. Pars plana vitrectomy, endolaser coagulation of the retina and the ciliary body combined with silicone oil endotamponade in the treatment of uncontrolled neovascular glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1999; 237(12): 969-75.
Flaxel C.J., Larkin G.B., Broadway D.B., Allen P.J., Leaver P.K. Peripheral transscleral retinal diode laser for rubeosis iridis. Retina 1997; 17(5): 421-9.
Olmos L.C., Lee R.K. Medical and surgical treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2011; 51(3): 27-36.
Shields M.B., Shields S.E. Noncontact transscleral Nd:YAG cyclophotocoagulation: a long-term follow-up of 500 patients. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1994; 92(271-83; discussion 83-7.
Threlkeld A.B., Johnson M.H. Contact transscleral diode cyclophotocoagulation for refractory glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1999; 8(1): 3-7.
Delgado M.F., Dickens C.J., Iwach A.G., Novack G.D., Nychka D.S., Wong P.C., et al. Long-term results of noncontact neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet cyclophotocoagulation in neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2003; 110(5): 895-9.
Euswas A., Warrasak S. Long-term results of early trabeculectomy with mitomycin-C and subsequent posterior segment intervention in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma with hazy ocular media. J Med Assoc Thai 2005; 88(11): 1582-90.
Kiuchi Y., Sugimoto R., Nakae K., Saito Y., Ito S. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C for treatment of neovascular glaucoma in diabetic patients. Ophthalmologica 2006; 220(6): 383-8.
Mandal A.K., Majji A.B., Mandal S.P., Das T., Jalali S., Gothwal V.K., et al. Mitomycin-C-augmented trabeculectomy for neovascular glaucoma. A preliminary report. Indian J Ophthalmol 2002; 50(4): 287-93.
Allen R.C., Bellows A.R., Hutchinson B.T., Murphy S.D. Filtration surgery in the treatment of neovascular glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1982; 89(10): 1181-7.
Saito Y., Higashide T., Takeda H., Ohkubo S., Sugiyama K. Beneficial effects of preoperative intravitreal bevacizumab on trabeculectomy outcomes in neovascular glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 2010; 88(1): 96-102.
Mermoud A., Salmon J.F., Alexander P., Straker C., Murray A.D. Molteno tube implantation for neovascular glaucoma. Long-term results and factors influencing the outcome. Ophthalmology 1993; 100(6): 897-902.
Tsai J.C., Johnson C.C., Dietrich M.S. The Ahmed shunt versus the Baerveldt shunt for refractory glaucoma: a single-surgeon comparison of outcome. Ophthalmology 2003; 110(9): 1814-21.
Netland P.A. The Ahmed glaucoma valve in neovascular glaucoma (An AOS Thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2009; 107(325-42.
Yalvac I.S., Eksioglu U., Satana B., Duman S. Long-term results of Ahmed glaucoma valve and Molteno implant in neovascular glaucoma. Eye (Lond) 2007; 21(1): 65-70.
Dev S., Damji K.F., DeBacker C.M., Cox T.A., Dutton J.J., Allingham R.R. Decrease in intraocular pressure after orbital decompression for thyroid orbitopathy. Can J Ophthalmol 1998; 33(6): 314-9.
Keltner J.L., Satterfield D., Dublin A.B., Lee B.C. Dural and carotid cavernous sinus fistulas. Diagnosis, management, and complications. Ophthalmology 1987; 94(12): 1585-600.
Goldberg R.A., Goldey S.H., Duckwiler G., Vinuela F. Management of cavernous sinus-dural fistulas. Indications and techniques for primary embolization via the superior ophthalmic vein. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114(6): 707-14.
Minas T.F., Podos S.M. Familial glaucoma associated with elevated episcleral venous pressure. Arch Ophthalmol 1968; 80(2): 202-8.
Foroozan R., Buono L.M., Savino P.J., Sergott R.C. Idiopathic dilated episcleral veins and increased intraocular pressure. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87(5): 652-4.
Kollarits C.R., Gaasterland D., Di Chiro G., Christiansen J., Yee R.D. Management of a patient with orbital varices, visual loss, and ipsilateral glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg 1977; 8(5): 54-62.
Ellant J.P., Obstbaum S.A. Lens-induced glaucoma. Doc Ophthalmol 1992; 81(3): 317-38.
Epstein D.L. Diagnosis and management of lens-induced glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1982; 89(3): 227-30.
Papaconstantinou D., Georgalas I., Kourtis N., Krassas A., Diagourtas A., Koutsandrea C., et al. Lens-induced glaucoma in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging 2009; 4(331-6.
Yaakub A., Abdullah N., Siti Raihan I., Ahmad Tajudin L.S. Lens-induced glaucoma in a tertiary centre in northeast of Malaysia. Malays Fam Physician 2014; 9(2): 48-52.
Rodman H.I. Chronic oper-angle glaucoma associated with traumatic dislocation of the lens. A new pathogenetic concept. Arch Ophthalmol 1963; 69(445-54.
Papakostas T.D., Yonekawa Y., Chee Y.E., Qian C.X., Kim I.K. Ultrasonographic biomicroscopy in lens-induced glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133(1): 112.
Rohatgi J.N. Lens induced glaucoma. A clinical study. Indian J Ophthalmol 1972; 20(2): 88-93.
Sitoula R.P., Sarkar I., Nayak D., Singh S.K. Lens induced glaucoma: An experience in tertiary eye care center in eastern Nepal. Nepal J Ophthalmol 2016; 8(16): 161-6.
Shrestha R., Godar M.S., Gurung S., Devkota P., Manandhar L.D., Shrestha N. Lens induced glaucoma in a tertiary eye care centre in Western Nepal. Nepal J Ophthalmol 2019; 11(22): 145-51.
Pradhan D., Hennig A., Kumar J., Foster A. A prospective study of 413 cases of lens-induced glaucoma in Nepal. Indian J Ophthalmol 2001; 49(2): 103-7.
Li M., Yan X.Q., Li G.Y., Zhang H. Post-miosis changes in the anterior chamber structures in primary and lens-induced secondary chronic angle-closure glaucoma. Int J Ophthalmol 2019; 12(4): 675-80.
Chandrashekharan S., Chakrabarty S., Tanwar M., Madhuvarasu B., Uduman M.S., Ramakrishnan R. Outcomes and favourable prognostic factors in patients of phacomorphic and phacolytic glaucoma managed by manual small-incision cataract surgery: A retrospective study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2022; 70(4): 1216-21.
Sinha A. Combined trabeculectomy and cataract extraction (in lens induced glaucoma). Indian J Ophthalmol 1983; 31 Suppl(836-8.
Azuara-Blanco A., Burr J., Ramsay C., Cooper D., Foster P.J., Friedman D.S., et al. Effectiveness of early lens extraction for the treatment of primary angle-closure glaucoma (EAGLE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016; 388(10052): 1389-97.
Costa V.P., Leung C.K.S., Kook M.S., Lin S.C., Global Glaucoma A. Clear lens extraction in eyes with primary angle closure and primary angle-closure glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2020; 65(6): 662-74.
Potop V., Corbu C. The role of clear lens extraction in angle closure glaucoma. Rom J Ophthalmol 2017; 61(4): 244-8.
Bogorodzki B., Gralek M. Phacolytic glaucoma as a complication of highly developed cataract. Klin Oczna 1988; 90(12): 422-3.
Cernea P., Nicolescu R. Phacolytic glaucoma. Rev Chir Oncol Radiol O R L Oftalmol Stomatol Ser Oftalmol 1988; 32(2): 95-100.
Filipe J.C., Palmares J., Delgado L., Lopes J.M., Borges J., Castro-Correia J. Phacolytic glaucoma and lens-induced uveitis. Int Ophthalmol 1993; 17(5): 289-93.
Mavrakanas N., Axmann S., Issum C.V., Schutz J.S., Shaarawy T. Phacolytic glaucoma: are there 2 forms? J Glaucoma 2012; 21(4): 248-9.
Oprescu M. The etiopathology of phacoantigenic uveitis and phacolytic glaucoma. Oftalmologia 1992; 36(3): 207-13.
Seth N.G., Thattaruthody F., Pandav S.S. Phacolytic Glaucoma. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2019; 2(3): 155.
Shah S.S., Meyer J.J. Lens-Induced Glaucoma. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) ineligible companies. Disclosure: Jay Meyer declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.2024.
Sun W.R. Phacolytic glaucoma. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 1986; 22(1): 24-6.
Marak G.E., Jr. Phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis. Surv Ophthalmol 1992; 36(5): 325-39.
Thach A.B., Marak G.E., Jr., McLean I.W., Green W.R. Phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis: a clinicopathologic review. Int Ophthalmol 1991; 15(4): 271-9.
Hassan N.A., Reddy M.A., Reddy S.S. Late occurrence of lens particle glaucoma due to an occult glass intralenticular foreign body. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2009; 16(2): 97-9.
Jain S.S., Rao P., Nayak P., Kothari K. Posterior capsular dehiscence following blunt injury causing delayed onset lens particle glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 2004; 52(4): 325-7.
Kee C., Lee S. Lens particle glaucoma occurring 15 years after cataract surgery. Korean J Ophthalmol 2001; 15(2): 137-9.
Kim T.H., Kim S.J., Kim E., Chung I.Y., Park J.M., Yoo J.M., et al. Spontaneous anterior lens capsular dehiscence causing lens particle glaucoma. Yonsei Med J 2009; 50(3): 452-4.
Braganza A., Thomas R., George T., Mermoud A. Management of phacolytic glaucoma: experience of 135 cases. Indian J Ophthalmol 1998; 46(3): 139-43.
Mandal A.K., Gothwal V.K. Intraocular pressure control and visual outcome in patients with phacolytic glaucoma managed by extracapsular cataract extraction with or without posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1998; 29(11): 880-9.
Venkatesh R., Tan C.S., Kumar T.T., Ravindran R.D. Safety and efficacy of manual small incision cataract surgery for phacolytic glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2007; 91(3): 279-81.
Apple D.J., Mamalis N., Steinmetz R.L., Loftfield K., Crandall A.S., Olson R.J. Phacoanaphylactic endophthalmitis associated with extracapsular cataract extraction and posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102(10): 1528-32.
Kersey J.P., Broadway D.C. Corticosteroid-induced glaucoma: a review of the literature. Eye (Lond) 2006; 20(4): 407-16.
Saadat F., Raji A., Zomorodian K., Eslami M.B., Pezeshki M., Khorramizadeh M.R., et al. Alteration in Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPS) Activity in Fibroblast Cell Line by Dexamethasone: A Possible Mechanism in Corticosteroid-Induced Glaucoma. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol 2003; 2(3): 145-8.
Siliato F. Pathogenesis of corticosteroid-induced glaucoma. Minerva Oftalmol 1969; 11(5): 160-3.
Armaly M.F. Effect of Corticosteroids on Intraocular Pressure and Fluid Dynamics. I. The Effect of Dexamethasone in the Normal Eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1963; 70(482-91.
Armaly M.F. Effect of Corticosteroids on Intraocular Pressure and Fluid Dynamics. Ii. The Effect of Dexamethasone in the Glaucomatous Eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1963; 70(492-9.
Jones R., 3rd, Rhee D.J. Corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension and glaucoma: a brief review and update of the literature. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2006; 17(2): 163-7.
Lam D.S., Fan D.S., Ng J.S., Yu C.B., Wong C.Y., Cheung A.Y. Ocular hypertensive and anti-inflammatory responses to different dosages of topical dexamethasone in children: a randomized trial. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2005; 33(3): 252-8.
Becker B., Hahn K.A. Topical Corticosteroids and Heredity in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1964; 57(543-51.
Cantrill H.L., Palmberg P.F., Zink H.A., Waltman S.R., Podos S.M., Becker B. Comparison of in vitro potency of corticosteroids with ability to raise intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 79(6): 1012-7.
Urban R.C., Jr., Dreyer E.B. Corticosteroid-induced glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1993; 33(2): 135-9.
Panda A., Sood N.N., Agarwal L.P. Corticosteroid induced glaucoma and cataract. Indian J Ophthalmol 1981; 29(4): 377-9.
Spaeth G.L., Monteiro de Barros D.S., Fudemberg S.J. Visual loss caused by corticosteroid-induced glaucoma: how to avoid it. Retina 2009; 29(8): 1057-61.
Smithen L.M., Ober M.D., Maranan L., Spaide R.F. Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide and intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138(5): 740-3.
AlObaida I., Al Owaifeer A.M., Alotaibi H., Alsafi A., Ali Aljasim L. Outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty in corticosteroid-induced ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2022; 32(3): 1525-9.
Kawabe A., Uesawa Y. Analysis of Corticosteroid-Induced Glaucoma Using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Reporting Database. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16(7).
Scruggs D., Scruggs R., Stukenborg G., Netland P.A., Calland J.F. Ocular injuries in trauma patients: an analysis of 28,340 trauma admissions in the 2003-2007 National Trauma Data Bank National Sample Program. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012; 73(5): 1308-12.
Wong T.Y., Klein B.E., Klein R. The prevalence and 5-year incidence of ocular trauma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2000; 107(12): 2196-202.
De Leon-Ortega J.E., Girkin C.A. Ocular trauma-related glaucoma. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2002; 15(2): 215-23.
Girkin C.A., McGwin G., Jr., Morris R., Kuhn F. Glaucoma following penetrating ocular trauma: a cohort study of the United States Eye Injury Registry. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139(1): 100-5.
May D.R., Kuhn F.P., Morris R.E., Witherspoon C.D., Danis R.P., Matthews G.P., et al. The epidemiology of serious eye injuries from the United States Eye Injury Registry. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2000; 238(2): 153-7.
Canavan Y.M., Archer D.B. Anterior segment consequences of blunt ocular injury. Br J Ophthalmol 1982; 66(9): 549-55.
Klopfer J., Tielsch J.M., Vitale S., See L.C., Canner J.K. Ocular trauma in the United States. Eye injuries resulting in hospitalization, 1984 through 1987. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110(6): 838-42.
Lesher M.P., Durrie D.S., Stiles M.C. Corneal edema, hyphema, and angle recession after air bag inflation. Arch Ophthalmol 1993; 111(10): 1320-2.
Campbell D. Traumatic glaucoma. In: Shingleton BJ, Hersh PJ, Kenyon KR, editor. Textbook of Glaucoma. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991.
Coles W.H. Traumatic hyphema: an analysis of 235 cases. South Med J 1968; 61(8): 813-6.
Brandt M.T., Haug R.H. Traumatic hyphema: a comprehensive review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001; 59(12): 1462-70.
Sihota R., Sood N.N., Agarwal H.C. Traumatic glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1995; 73(3): 252-4.
Mansouri K., Sommerhalder J., Shaarawy T. Prospective comparison of ultrasound biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography for evaluation of anterior chamber dimensions in European eyes with primary angle closure. Eye (Lond) 2010; 24(2): 233-9.
Crouch E.R., Jr., Crouch E.R. Management of traumatic hyphema: therapeutic options. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1999; 36(5): 238-50; quiz 79-80.
Shiuey Y., Lucarelli M.J. Traumatic hyphema: outcomes of outpatient management. Ophthalmology 1998; 105(5): 851-5.
Ulagantheran V., Ahmad Fauzi M.S., Reddy S.C. Hyphema due to blunt injury: a review of 118 patients. Int J Ophthalmol 2010; 3(3): 272-6.
Sankar P.S., Chen T.C., Grosskreutz C.L., Pasquale L.R. Traumatic hyphema. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2002; 42(3): 57-68.
Walton W., Von Hagen S., Grigorian R., Zarbin M. Management of traumatic hyphema. Surv Ophthalmol 2002; 47(4): 297-334.
Bai H.Q., Yao L., Wang D.B., Jin R., Wang Y.X. Causes and treatments of traumatic secondary glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 2009; 19(2): 201-6.
Fong L.P. Secondary hemorrhage in traumatic hyphema. Predictive factors for selective prophylaxis. Ophthalmology 1994; 101(9): 1583-8.
Romano P.E., Robinson J.A. Traumatic hyphema: a comprehensive review of the past half century yields 8076 cases for which specific medical treatment reduces rebleeding 62%, from 13% to 5% (P<.0001). Binocul Vis Strabismus Q 2000; 15(2): 175-86.
Rahmani B., Jahadi H.R. Comparison of tranexamic acid and prednisolone in the treatment of traumatic hyphema. A randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology 1999; 106(2): 375-9.
Kaufman J.H., Tolpin D.W. Glaucoma after traumatic angle recession. A ten-year prospective study. Am J Ophthalmol 1974; 78(4): 648-54.
Mooney D. Angle recession and secondary glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1973; 57(8): 608-12.
Sihota R., Kumar S., Gupta V., Dada T., Kashyap S., Insan R., et al. Early predictors of traumatic glaucoma after closed globe injury: trabecular pigmentation, widened angle recess, and higher baseline intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126(7): 921-6.
Cameron J.D., Havener V.R. Histologic confirmation of ghost cell glaucoma by routine light microscopy. Am J Ophthalmol 1983; 96(2): 251-2.
Campbell D.G. Ghost cell glaucoma following trauma. Ophthalmology 1981; 88(11): 1151-8.
Campbell D.G., Essigmann E.M. Hemolytic ghost cell glaucoma. Further studies. Arch Ophthalmol 1979; 97(11): 2141-6.
de Keizer R.J., Hogeweg M. Ghost cell glaucoma. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1987; 84(3): 249-51.
Li Z.H. Ghost cell glaucoma. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 1984; 20(1): 23-5.
Montenegro M.H., Simmons R.J. Ghost cell glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1995; 35(1): 111-5.
Ritch R., Richardson T., Liebmann J. Ghost cell glaucoma. J Glaucoma 1994; 3(4): 333-8.
Rojas L., Ortiz G., Gutierrez M., Corredor S. Ghost cell glaucoma related to snake poisoning. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119(8): 1212-3.
Thomas R., Alexander T.A., Joseph P., Sajeev G. Ghost cell glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 1985; 33(1): 53-5.
Masket S., Ceran B.B. Atypical case of ocular hemosiderosis: leopard cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37(10): 1902-4.
Schechner R., Miller B., Merksamer E., Perlman I. A long term follow up of ocular siderosis: quantitative assessment of the electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 1990; 76(3): 231-40.
Vannas S. Hemosiderosis in eyes with secondary glaucoma after delayed intraocular hemorrhages. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1960; 38(254-67.
Phelps C.D., Watzke R.C. Hemolytic glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1975; 80(4): 690-5.
Manners T., Salmon J.F., Barron A., Willies C., Murray A.D. Trabeculectomy with mitomycin C in the treatment of post-traumatic angle recession glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85(2): 159-63.
Mermoud A., Salmon J.F., Barron A., Straker C., Murray A.D. Surgical management of post-traumatic angle recession glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1993; 100(5): 634-42.
Almodovar-Mercado J.C., Lopez-Beauchamp V. Penetrating eye globe injury from trauma with a metallic nail: a case report. Bol Asoc Med P R 2013; 105(2): 59-61.
Dannenberg A.L., Parver L.M., Fowler C.J. Penetrating eye injuries related to assault. The National Eye Trauma System Registry. Arch Ophthalmol 1992; 110(6): 849-52.
Landolfi M., Bhagat N., Langer P., Rescigno R., Mirani N., Gass J.D., et al. Penetrating trauma associated with findings of multiple evanescent white dot syndrome in the second eye: coincidence or an atypical case of sympathetic ophthalmia? Retina 2004; 24(4): 637-45.
Fernandez-Ferro M., Fernandez-Fernandez M., Fernandez-Sanroman J., Costas-Lopez A., Lopez-Betancourt A. Management of a Penetrating Orbital Trauma from an Unusual Foreign Body with Associated Eye Injury. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2019; 9(1): 214-7.
Ramdas W.D. The relation between dietary intake and glaucoma: a systematic review. Acta Ophthalmol 2018; 96(6): 550-6.
Ali M., Akhtar F. Ocular digital massage for the management of post- trabeculectomy underfiltering blebs. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2011; 21(11): 676-9.
Antonov P.F., Sitnikov O.V., Tsyrulina D.R., Mareeva G.I. Efficacy of sanatorium-resort treatment of patients with glaucoma at a low-mountain climatic resort. Military Medical Journal. 2020; 341(4): 69-71. (In Russ.)
Kothari R., Tathe S., Gogri P., Bhandari A. Lens-Induced Glaucoma: The need to spread awareness about early management of cataract among rural population. ISRN Ophthalmol. 2013:581727.
Selbach J.M., Posielek K., Steuhl K.P. et al. Episcleral venous pressure in untreated primary open-angle and normal-tension glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 2005; 219(6): 357-61.
Clinical Guidelines "Non-infectious uveitis" 2024 (July 12, 2024), Approved by the Russian Ministry of Health. (In Russ.)
Breusegem C., Spielberg L., Van Ginderdeuren R., Vandewalle E., Renier C., Van de Veire S., et al. Preoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or steroid and outcomes after trabeculectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117(7): 1324-1330.
Mastropasqua L., Brescia L., D'Arcangelo F., Nubile M., D'Onofrio G., Totta M., et al. Topical Steroids and Glaucoma Filtration Surgery Outcomes: An In Vivo Confocal Study of the Conjunctiva. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(14).
Lee S.J., Paranhos A., Shields M.B. Does titration of mitomycin C as an adjunct to trabeculectomy significantly influence the intraocular pressure outcome? Clin Ophthalmol. 2009; 3:81-87.
Bettin P., Khaw P.T. Glaucoma surgery. S. Karger AG, Basel (Switzerland). 2012. p. 188
Ahmadzadeh A., Kessel L., Schmidt B.S., Kolko M., Bach-Holm D. Steroids and/or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as postoperative treatment after trabeculectomy-12-month results of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(3).
Panarelli J.F., Nayak N.V., Sidoti P.A. Postoperative management of trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage implant surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016; 27(2): 170-176.
Starita R.J., Fellman R.L., Spaeth G.L., Poryzees E.M., Greenidge K.C., Traverso C.E. Short- and long-term effects of postoperative corticosteroids on trabeculectomy. Ophthalmology. 1985; 92(7): 938-946.
Frolov M.A. Drainage surgery of glaucoma. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2024. (In Russ.)
Chentsova O.B., Kharchenko L.N., Usova L.A. Secondary glaucoma. Clinical presentation, diagnostics, treatment. Textbook. Moscow, 2014, 20 p. (In Russ.)
Eye injuries / R.A. Gundorova, V.V. Neroev, V.V. Kashnikov. – Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publishing House, 2009. – 553 p. (In Russ.)
Susaykova, M.S. Features of clinical presentation, diagnostics and treatment of patients with eye trauma at the stage of emergency specialized care. / Abstract of Candidate of Medical Sciences Thesis: 14.00.08 / Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases – Moscow, – 2005. – P. 24. (In Russ.)
Patient management plans "Ophthalmology" Evidence-based medicine / Atkov O.Yu., Leonova E.S. – Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publishing House, 2011, – P. 83-99. (In Russ.)
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Antonov A.A., PhD in Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher, Glaucoma Department, FSBSI "M.M. Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases", Association of Ophthalmologists, Moscow
Astakhov S.Yu., MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology, First Saint Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University, Association of Ophthalmologists, Saint Petersburg
Brezhnev A.Yu., PhD in Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Kursk State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Ophthalmological Clinical Hospital – Ophthalmological Center, Russian Glaucoma Society, The Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia, Kursk
Brzheskiy V.V., MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Russian Glaucoma Society, The Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia, Saint Petersburg
Gazizova I.R., MD, Institute of Experimental Medicine "Medical Research Center", Russian Glaucoma Society, The Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia, Saint Petersburg
Golubev S.Yu., PhD in Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher, State Research Center of the Russian Federation – Institute of Biomedical Problems of the RAS, Association of Ophthalmologists, Moscow
Dogadova L.P., PhD in Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Ophthalmology, Pacific State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief Ophthalmologist of the Far Eastern Federal District, Russian Glaucoma Society, The Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia, Vladivostok
Egorov E.A., MD, Professor of the Academician A.P. Nesterov Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of General Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Russian Glaucoma Society, The Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia, Moscow
Erichev V.P., MD, Professor, Russian Glaucoma Society, The Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia, Moscow
Ivanova N.V., MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Eye Diseases, S.I. Georgievsky Medical Academy of Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Russian Glaucoma Society, The Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia, Simferopol
Zhuravleva A.N., PhD in Medical Sciences, Researcher, Glaucoma Department, National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases named after Helmholtz of the Russian Ministry of Health, Association of Ophthalmologists, Moscow
Zolotarev A.V., MD, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology, Samara State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief Physician of the T.I. Eroshevsky Samara Regional Clinical Ophthalmological Hospital, Association of Ophthalmologists, Samara
Karlova E.V., MD, Assistant Professor of the Department of Ophthalmology, Samara State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the Ophthalmological Department, T.I. Eroshevsky Samara Regional Clinical Ophthalmological Hospital, Association of Ophthalmologists, Samara
Kosakyan S.M., PhD in Medical Sciences, Ophthalmologist, Glaucoma Department, National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases named after Helmholtz of the Russian Ministry of Health, Association of Ophthalmologists, Moscow
Konovalova O.S., PhD in Medical Sciences, Head of the Tyumen Branch of the Ekaterinburg Eye Microsurgery MDC JSC, Associate Professor of the Department of Surgical Diseases with a Course in Ophthalmology, Tyumen State Medical University, Association of Ophthalmologists, Tyumen
Kulikov A.N., MD, Professor, Head of the Prof. V.V. Volkov Department and Clinic of Ophthalmology, Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Chief Ophthalmologist of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Chief freelance ophthalmologist of Saint Petersburg, Russian Glaucoma Society, The Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia, Saint Petersburg
Kuroedov A.V., MD, DSc, Head of the Ophthalmological Center, Mandryk Central Military Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology named after Academician A.P. Nesterov, Faculty of General Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Russian Glaucoma Society, Russian Ophthalmological Society, Moscow
Lovpache J.N., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Independent Expert, 3Z-MSK Eye Clinic, Russian Glaucoma Society, Russian Ophthalmological Society, Moscow
Malishevskaya T.N., MD, DSc, Head of the Analytical Work Department, Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Associate Professor at the Department of Continuing Medical Education, Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Association of Ophthalmologists, Moscow
Malyugin B.E., MD, DSc, Corresponding Member of the RAS, Professor, Deputy General Director for Research, S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Russian Ophthalmological Society, Moscow
Nikolaenko V.P., MD, DSc, Professor at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Ophthalmology, Saint Petersburg State University, Deputy Chief Medical Officer for Ophthalmology, City Multidisciplinary Hospital No. 2, Association of Ophthalmologists, Russian Glaucoma Society, Saint Petersburg
Onufriychuk O.N., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Ophthalmologist, Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies of Saint Petersburg State University, Russian Glaucoma Society, Russian Ophthalmological Society, Saint Petersburg
Petrov S.Yu., MD, DSc, Head of the Glaucoma Department, Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Professor at the Department of Continuing Medical Education, Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases of the Russian Ministry of Health, Association of Ophthalmologists, Moscow
Seleznev A.V., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Associate Professor, Ivanovo State Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Russian Glaucoma Society, Russian Ophthalmological Society, Ivanovo
Simonova S.V., Cand. Sc. (Med.), City Clinical Hospital No. 15 named after O.M. Filatova of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Russian Glaucoma Society, Moscow
Sokolovskaya T.V., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Leading Researcher at the Department of Surgical Glaucoma Treatment, S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Russian Ophthalmological Society, Moscow
Fursova A.Zh., MD, DSc, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Head of the Ophthalmological Department, State Novosibirsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Association of Ophthalmologists, Novosibirsk
Yuryeva T.N., MD, DSc, Professor, Deputy Director for Research, Irkutsk Branch of the S. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution, Association of Ophthalmologists, Irkutsk
Yakubova L.V., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Senior Researcher at the Glaucoma Department, Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Association of Ophthalmologists, Moscow
No conflict of interest.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Methods used for evidence collection/selection: electronic database search, library resources. Description of methods used for evidence collection/selection: the evidence base for the recommendations includes publications included in the Cochrane library, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases, as well as monographs and articles in leading specialized peer-reviewed domestic and foreign medical journals on the subject with a search depth of at least 10 years. (In Russ.)
Levels of evidence certainty are presented in accordance with the methodological recommendations for the development and updating of clinical guidelines. (In Russ.)
Methods used to assess the quality and strength of evidence: expert consensus, significance assessment in accordance with the rating scheme.
The preliminary version of these recommendations was peer-reviewed by independent experts in order to ensure accessibility for understanding and interpreting the evidence underlying the recommendations. Comments received from experts were systematized and discussed by members of the working groups of the Association "Russian Glaucoma Society", Association "Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia" and Association "Association of Ophthalmologists", and the changes made were recorded. If no changes were made, the reasons for refusal were taken into account. (In Russ.)
Comments were received from primary care ophthalmologists regarding the clarity of the presentation of the recommendations and their assessment of the significance of the recommendations as a working tool in daily clinical practice. (In Russ.)
For the final edition and quality control of the implementation of the recommendations, they were re-analyzed by the working group members, who concluded that all expert comments and feedback were taken into account, and the risk of bias in the development of the recommendations was minimized. (In Russ.)
Economic analysis.
Cost analysis was not performed, and pharmacoeconomic publications were not analyzed.
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
Ophthalmologists
Healthcare and public health organization specialists
Residents in the specialty "Ophthalmology" (31.08.59) and scientific and pedagogical staff (postgraduate students) in the field of study "Clinical Medicine" (31.06.01), profile – "Eye Diseases" (14.01.07)
Students of higher medical educational institutions
Table P1 – Scale for assessing levels of evidence certainty.
Level of evidence | Definition |
|---|---|
Determination of levels of evidence certainty for therapeutic, rehabilitation, and preventive interventions | |
1 | Systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design (other than randomized clinical trials) with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Determination of levels of evidence certainty for diagnostic interventions | |
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table P2 – Scale for assessing grades of recommendation (GoR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitation interventions).
Grade of Recommendation | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
C | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation – lack of proper quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies have low methodological quality and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines
The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic updating – clinical guidelines are reviewed at least once every 3 years, as well as when new data emerge from the perspective of evidence-based medicine regarding the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or if there are justified additions/comments to the previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more than once every 6 months. The decision to update is made by the Russian Ministry of Health based on proposals submitted by medical non-profit professional organizations. The formulated proposals must take into account the results of a comprehensive assessment of medicines, medical devices, and the results of clinical approbation. (In Russ.)
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
These clinical guidelines were developed taking into account the following documents:
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10) (adopted by the 43rd World Health Assembly, 1990).
"On the transition of healthcare bodies and institutions of the Russian Federation to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision" (as amended by the Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated January 12, 1998, No. 3). Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated May 27, 1997, No. 170. (In Russ.)
"On sending the list of added and excluded ICD-10 categories". Letter of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated December 5, 2014, No. 13-2/1664. (In Russ.)
ICD-10 updates for 2024. URL: https://mkb-10.com/updates/ (accessed August 29, 2022).
Federal Law "On the Basics of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation" (as amended on August 8, 2024) dated November 21, 2011, No. 323-FZ. (In Russ.)
Federal Law "On Amendments to Article 40 of the Federal Law 'On Compulsory Medical Insurance in the Russian Federation' and the Federal Law 'On the Basics of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation' regarding clinical guidelines" (as amended on June 11, 2021) dated December 25, 2018, No. 489-FZ. (In Russ.)
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 114n dated February 25, 2022 "On Approval of the Standard of Medical Care for Adults with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma (Diagnosis, Treatment, and Dispensary Observation)" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of Russia on April 4, 2022, No. 68043)
"On approval of the Procedure for assigning certain functions of the attending physician to a paramedic or midwife by the head of a medical organization when organizing the provision of primary health care and emergency medical care for the direct provision of medical care to a patient during the period of observation and treatment, including the prescription and use of medicines, including narcotic and psychotropic drugs" (as amended on October 31, 2017). Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated March 23, 2012, No. 252n. (In Russ.)
"On approval of the Procedure for providing medical care to the adult population for diseases of the eye, its adnexa and orbit" (as amended on February 1, 2022). Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated November 12, 2012, No. 902n. (In Russ.)
"On approval of the Regulation on the organization of specialized, including high-tech, medical care" (as amended on August 27, 2015). Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated December 2, 2014, No. 796n. (In Russ.)
"On approval of criteria for assessing the quality of medical care". Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated May 10, 2017, No. 203n. (In Russ.)
"On approval of the professional standard 'Ophthalmologist'". Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation dated June 5, 2017, No. 470n. (In Russ.)
"On the Approval of the Nomenclature of Medical Services" (as amended on September 24, 2020). Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 804n dated October 13, 2017.
"On the Approval of the List of Medical Devices Implanted into the Human Body Upon Provision of Medical Care, and the List of Medical Devices Dispensed by Prescription upon Provision of a Set of Social Services" (as amended on February 20, 2024). Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 3053-r dated December 31, 2018.
"On the Approval of Criteria for the Formation of the List of Diseases, Conditions (Groups of Diseases, Conditions) for Which Clinical Guidelines Are Developed." Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 101n dated February 28, 2019.
"On the Approval of the Procedure and Deadlines for the Development of Clinical Guidelines, Their Revision, the Standard Form of Clinical Guidelines and Requirements for Their Structure, Composition, and Scientific Validity of Information Included in Clinical Guidelines" (as amended on June 23, 2020). Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 103n dated February 28, 2019.
"On the Approval of the Procedure and Deadlines for the Approval and Endorsement of Clinical Guidelines, Criteria for the Scientific and Practical Council's Decision to Approve, Reject, or Send Clinical Guidelines for Revision, or the Decision to Revise Them." Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 104n dated February 28, 2019.
"On the Approval of the Procedure for Organizing the Provision of High-Tech Medical Care Using the Unified State Health Information System." Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 824n dated October 2, 2019.
"On the Approval of the List of Vital and Essential Medicines for Medical Use for 2020, the List of Medicines for Medical Use, Including Medicines Prescribed by Decisions of Medical Commissions of Medical Organizations, the List of Medicines Intended for Persons with Hemophilia, Cystic Fibrosis, Pituitary Dwarfism, Gaucher Disease, Malignant Neoplasms of Lymphoid, Hematopoietic and Related Tissues, Multiple Sclerosis, Hemolytic-Uremic Syndrome, Systemic-Onset Juvenile Arthritis, Mucopolysaccharidosis Types I, II, and VI, Persons After Organ and/or Tissue Transplantation, and the Minimum Assortment of Medicines Necessary for the Provision of Medical Care" (as amended on April 16, 2024). Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2406-r dated October 12, 2019.
"On the Program of State Guarantees of Free Medical Care to Citizens for 2024 and for the Planning Period of 2025 and 2026" (as amended on March 23, 2024). Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2353 dated December 28, 2023.
"On the Approval of the Procedure for Conducting Dispensary Observation of Adults" (as amended on February 28, 2024). Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 168n dated March 15, 2022.
"On the List of Diseases or Conditions (Groups of Diseases or Conditions) in Which the Use of a Medicinal Product is Permitted in Accordance with Indications (Characteristics) of the Medicinal Product Not Specified in its Instructions for Use" (as amended on August 1, 2023). Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1180-r dated May 16, 2022.
"On the Approval of the Procedure for Conducting Preventive Medical Examinations and Health Check-ups of Certain Groups of the Adult Population" (as amended by Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 44n dated February 1, 2022) (as amended on July 19, 2024). Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 404n dated April 27, 2021.
"On the Approval of Lists of Medical Indications and Contraindications for Sanatorium-Resort Treatment" Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1029n dated September 28, 2020 (as amended on April 26, 2023).
"On Approval of the Standard of Sanatorium-Resort Care for Patients with Diseases of the Eye and Its Adnexa." Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation No. 215 dated November 22, 2004.
"On Approval of the Standard of Medical Care for Adults with Suspected Glaucoma (Diagnosis, Treatment, and Dispensary Observation)." Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 115n dated February 25, 2022.
"On Approval of Accounting Form of Medical Documentation No. 131/u 'Card for Accounting of Preventive Medical Examination (Dispensary Profiling)', the Procedure for Its Maintenance and the Form of Industry Statistical Reporting No. 131/o 'Information on Conducting Preventive Medical Examinations and Dispensary Profiling of Certain Groups of the Adult Population', the Procedure for Its Completion and Submission Deadlines." Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1207n dated November 10, 2020.
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Fig. Algorithm for managing a patient with primary open-angle glaucoma (Cited from: National Guidelines for Glaucoma for Practicing Physicians // Moscow: "GEOTAR-Media"; 2019: 384)
Appendix C. Patient Information
Patients with POAG must be informed that an accurate diagnosis, as well as the ability to determine disease progression, will be established using a set of modern diagnostic methods. The benefits and risks of each treatment method must be discussed with the patient.
Below is a patient information leaflet for individuals diagnosed with POAG.
What is GLAUCOMA?
GLAUCOMA is a group of chronic eye diseases occurring predominantly in individuals over 40–50 years of age, the main manifestation of which is an increase in intraocular pressure, leading to progressive damage to the optic nerve and, consequently, the appearance of visual field defects ("side" vision) and decreased visual acuity down to complete blindness.
How does GLAUCOMA manifest? What are the symptoms of the disease?
GLAUCOMA develops gradually, often proceeding without any symptoms, and this is precisely what makes it dangerous. Sometimes signs of GLAUCOMA may include: periodic "blurring" of vision; appearance of rainbow halos around light sources that do not disappear upon forced blinking or wiping the eye; loss of clear contours when viewing various objects; sensation of "heaviness" or pain in the eye; appearance of a "grid" or "veil" before the eye; difficulty with close-range work (e.g., reading); need for frequent changes of glasses; difficulty orienting in the dark. Headaches are also possible, mainly in the superciliary arches and temporal regions. In later stages, visual field constriction appears on the nasal side. These symptoms may also be observed in other diseases not related to GLAUCOMA, but their occurrence should always serve as a reason for an urgent visit to an ophthalmologist.
If I see well, does that mean I do not have GLAUCOMA?
GLAUCOMA is an insidious disease that is asymptomatic in the early stages. Therefore, regardless of whether you have complaints or not, you must undergo an annual preventive examination by an ophthalmologist as part of routine health checks, with obligatory measurement of IOP levels and fundus examination. The scope of examinations is determined by the physician.
What are the risk factors that increase the likelihood of developing GLAUCOMA?
Risk factors are not the direct cause of GLAUCOMA, but they increase the likelihood of its occurrence. These include: age: GLAUCOMA usually develops in people over 40 years of age; hereditary predisposition: if family members or close relatives have already been diagnosed with GLAUCOMA; myopia exceeding 6 diopters; diabetes mellitus; migraine.
What treatment will the doctor prescribe for me in case of GLAUCOMA?
The main goal of treatment is to lower the IOP level, which stabilizes the process or slows down its progression while maintaining an acceptable quality of life. If you are diagnosed with GLAUCOMA, the doctor usually prescribes IOP-lowering eye drops. If medical treatment and adherence to the prescribed regimen do not lower the eye pressure or lower it insufficiently, laser or surgical intervention will be offered. The choice of GLAUCOMA treatment method is determined individually, depending on the course of the disease, other concomitant factors, and falls within the competence of the attending physician.
What is the prognosis for the course of GLAUCOMA?
The primary condition for preserving satisfactory visual functions and the associated quality of life is timely detection of the disease and its adequate treatment. At the same time, GLAUCOMA is a severe chronic progressive disease that remains to this day one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness and low vision worldwide.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. Disk Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS) for assessing and sketching optic disc changes during the monitoring of glaucoma patients
Russian title: Disk Damage Likelihood Scale for assessing and sketching optic disc changes in glaucoma patients
Original title (if available): DDLS, Disk Damage Likelihood Scale
Source (official developer website, validation study): Spaeth G.L., Henderer J., Liu C. et al. The disc damage likelihood scale: reproducibility of a new method of estimating the amount of optic nerve damage caused by glaucoma. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2002;100:181-5; Cheng K., Tatham A.J. Spotlight on the Disc-Damage Likelihood Scale (DDLS). Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:4059-4071.
Type (underline): rating scale
Purpose: assessment of optic disc changes in the monitoring of glaucoma patients
Content (template): parameters used: optic disc size, neuroretinal rim (NRR) to optic disc size ratio
DDLS Stage | Change in Neuroretinal Rim (NRR) dimensions (Ratio of NRR dimensions to optic disc) | DDLS Stage | Examples | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
For small disc < 1.50 mm | For medium-sized disc 1.50–2.00 mm | For large disc >2.00 mm | Optic nerve 1.25 mm | Optic nerve 1.75 mm | Optic nerve 2.25 mm | ||
1 | >0,5 | >0,4 | >0,3 | 0a |
|
|
|
2 | 0,4-0,49 | 0,3-0,39 | 0,2-0,29 | 0b |
|
|
|
3 | 0,3-0,39 | 0,2-0,29 | 0,1-0,19 | 1 |
|
|
|
4 | 0,2-0,29 | 0,1 – 0,19 | <0,1 | 2 |
|
|
|
5 | 0,1-0,19 | <0,1 | 0 in a sector <45° | 3 |
|
|
|
6 | <0,1 | 0 in a sector <45° | 0 in a sector from 46° to 90° | 4 |
|
|
|
7 | 0 in a sector <45° | 0 in a sector from 46° to 90° | 0 in a sector from 91° to 180° | 5 |
|
|
|
8 | 0 in a sector from 46° to 90° | 0 in a sector from 91° to 180° | 0 in a sector from 181° to 270° | 6 |
|
|
|
9 | 0 in a sector from 91° to 180° | 0 in a sector from 181° to 270° | 0 in a sector >270° | 7a |
|
|
|
10 | 0 in a sector from 181° to 270° | 0 in a sector >270° | - | 7b |
|
| |
Key (interpretation): first, the size of the optic disc is determined (using a slit lamp scale with special conversion factors: for a +60 D lens magnification, the obtained result is multiplied by 0.88; for a +78 D lens, by 1.2; for a +90 D lens magnification, by 1.63), then the size and configuration of the neuroretinal rim are determined.
Optic discs corresponding to stage 4 and above on the DDLS scale are considered pathological.
Notes. Clinical examination of the optic disc remains an essential component of glaucoma diagnosis and monitoring. The DDLS provides a reliable method for clinical grading of glaucomatous optic disc changes, with a higher degree of reproducibility compared to the classic cup-to-disc ratio measurement.




























