List of Abbreviations
BP – blood pressure
WHO – World Health Organization
Dr. Med. Sci. – Doctor of Medical Sciences
DNA – deoxyribonucleic acid
VLE – List of Vital and Essential Drugs
Cand. Med. Sci. – Candidate of Medical Sciences
CT – computed tomography
Chest CT – computed tomography of the chest organs
Chest X-ray – radiography of the chest organs
Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation – Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
ICD-10 – International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision
INN – International Nonproprietary Name
ARF – acute respiratory failure
ARDS – acute respiratory distress syndrome
CHI – Compulsory Health Insurance
ARVI – Acute respiratory viral infections
ICU – intensive care unit
RF – Russian Federation
FL – Federal Law
RR – respiratory rate
HR – heart rate
SARS-CoV-2 – novel coronavirus infection causing the COVID-19 pandemic
Terms and Definitions
Evidence-based medicine is an approach to medical practice that aims to optimize decision-making by emphasizing the use of evidence from well-designed and well-conducted research regarding the effectiveness and safety of prophylactic, diagnostic, and therapeutic interventions, while such evidence is searched, compared, summarized, and widely disseminated for patient care
Disease – a disorder of bodily function, working capacity, and the ability to adapt to changing environmental and internal conditions arising from the impact of pathogenic factors, accompanied by alterations in the body's protective-compensatory and protective-adaptive reactions and mechanisms.
Primary disease – a disease that, by itself or through complications, necessitates primary medical care due to the greatest threat to working capacity, life and health, or leads to disability, or causes death;
Concomitant disease – a disease that has no causal relationship with the primary disease, is secondary to it in terms of the need for medical care, impact on working capacity, danger to life and health, and is not the cause of death;
Severity of a disease or condition – a criterion determining the degree of damage to human organs and/or body systems or impairment of their functions caused by the disease or condition or their complication;
Outcomes of diseases – medical and biological consequences of a disease;
Consequences (results) – disease outcomes, social and economic results of the application of medical technologies;
Complication of a disease – addition of a physiological process impairment syndrome to the disease; - violation of the integrity of an organ or its wall; - hemorrhage; - developed acute or chronic failure of an organ function or an organ system;
Instrumental diagnostics – diagnostics using various devices, apparatuses, and instruments to examine a patient.
Quality of medical care – a set of characteristics reflecting the timeliness of medical care, the correctness of the choice of prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation methods during the provision of care, and the degree of achievement of the planned result.
Clinical guidelines – a document based on proven clinical experience that describes the physician's actions regarding the diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention of diseases, helping them make correct clinical decisions.
Laboratory diagnostics – a set of methods aimed at analyzing test material using various specialized equipment.
Patient model – a set of clinical, laboratory, and instrumental diagnostic features allowing to identify a disease (poisoning, trauma, physiological state) and classify it into a group of conditions with common etiology and pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and general approaches to treatment and condition correction;
Medical worker– an individual who has medical or other education, works in a medical organization and whose labor (job) duties include the implementation of medical activities, or an individual who is an individual entrepreneur directly.
Nosological form is a set of clinical, laboratory, and instrumental diagnostic signs that allow identifying a disease (poisoning, trauma, physiological state) and classifying it into a group of conditions with a common etiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations.
Syndrome – a condition developing as a consequence of a disease and defined by a set of clinical, laboratory, and instrumental diagnostic signs that allow its identification and classification into a group of conditions with varying etiologies but common pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and general treatment approaches, which nevertheless depend on the diseases underlying the syndrome.
Level of certainty of evidence – reflects the degree of confidence that the found effect of a medical intervention is true.
Level of recommendation certainty – reflects not only the degree of confidence in the validity of the intervention's effect, but also the degree of confidence that following the recommendations will bring more benefit than harm in a specific situation.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Viral pneumonia (VP) – acute inflammation of the respiratory divisions of the lungs caused by viral pathogens, presenting with intoxication and respiratory failure syndromes [1-7].
After identifying the viral pathogen, it is necessary to consider the possibility of bacterial coinfection and determine whether antibacterial therapy is needed [94].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Currently, it is recognized that the prevalence of viral infection in patients with pneumonia reaches 27% [95].
Viral pneumonia can be caused by a large number of viruses containing RNA or DNA as their nucleic acid [96].
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)
RNA virus
RSV is the most common cause of viral pneumonia in young children and infants.
Rhinovirus
RNA
Rhinovirus is the most common cause of upper respiratory tract infection across all age groups, although it is less frequently encountered as a cause of viral pneumonia.
Influenza viruses A, B, and C
RNA
Influenza A is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity among viral types of pneumonia.
There are several subtypes of influenza A. Two subtypes of particular concern – are avian influenza (H5N1) and swine influenza (H1N1).
Human metapneumovirus
RNA
Human metapneumovirus – is an emerging viral pathogen increasingly recognized as a cause of viral pneumonia and considered responsible for atypical pneumonia outbreaks.
Parainfluenza viruses types 1, 2, 3, and 4
RNA
Parainfluenza virus has several serotypes and is most commonly associated with pneumonia-like illness in young children on a seasonal basis. Spring and autumn predominate.
Human bocavirus Coronavirus
RNA
Coronaviruses – are viruses causing pneumonia, typically in immunocompromised individuals.
However, one coronavirus subtype causes Middle East respiratory syndrome, and another – severe acute respiratory syndrome.
Adenovirus
DNA
Adenovirus most commonly causes pneumonia in solid organ transplant or hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.
Enteroviruses
RNA
Enteroviruses, although common causes of poliomyelitis, gastrointestinal, and upper respiratory syndromes, less frequently cause viral pneumonia.
Varicella-zoster virus
DNA
Varicella-zoster virus is associated with both chickenpox and shingles and can cause severe forms of pneumonia, particularly in unimmunized pregnant women and non-pregnant adults with chickenpox. It is a fairly common cause of pneumonia in individuals with HIV following a shingles outbreak.
Hantavirus
RNA
Hantavirus – a zoonotic viral pathogen originating in the American Southwest and associated with rodent excreta exposure.
Hantavirus pneumonia is frequently associated with rapid respiratory failure and cardiovascular failure.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)
DNA
Epstein-Barr virus, although frequently involved in mononucleosis-like syndromes, is rarely associated with viral pneumonia. Most cases occur in individuals with hematological disorders.
Human herpesviruses 6 and 7
DNA
Herpes simplex virus
DNA
HSV I and II are associated with viral pneumonia in immunocompromised patients, including those with HIV, as well as solid organ and hematopoietic transplant recipients.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV)
DNA
Cytomegalovirus is a significant cause of pneumonia in HIV-infected patients with a CD4 count below 100 cells per cubic millimeter.
Cytomegalovirus is also a frequent cause of pneumonia in solid organ and hematopoietic transplant recipients.
Measles
RNA
A childhood exanthematous disease which, although less common in the industrialized world due to vaccination, remains a major contributor to childhood mortality worldwide as a result of viral pneumonia complications.
Middle East respiratory syndrome (coronavirus)
RNA
A coronavirus subspecies associated with severe pneumonia. First identified in the Middle East with an initial mortality rate of 30%.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (metapneumovirus)
RNA
A coronavirus subspecies causing life-threatening pneumonia
A meta-analysis by Burk M et al. demonstrated that influenza and rhinovirus were the most frequently detected viruses. Respiratory syncytial virus, coronavirus, parainfluenza, adenovirus, and human metapneumovirus play a smaller but notable role in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), being detected in 1–4% of patients. Viruses detected in <1% of the CAP population include enterovirus, varicella-zoster virus, and herpes simplex virus [97].
Infection with SARS-CoV-2 certainly plays a role in the development of CAP, but it must be emphasized that in the current season, severe cases of disease accompanied by lung involvement are extremely rare. COVID-19 typically presents mildly, akin to a seasonal respiratory infection. From a clinical perspective, it is worth bearing in mind that there are no pathognomonic signs of COVID-19, just as with other viral diseases, and the diagnosis is established solely on the basis of laboratory diagnostics (rapid immunochromatographic assay, polymerase chain reaction) [98].
All of the aforementioned viruses are causative agents of community-acquired pneumonia regardless of the patient's age. The incidence of respiratory viruses in patients with community-acquired pneumonia is highly seasonal, increasing during the autumn-winter period. A distinction is made between primary viral pneumonia (resulting from the direct cytopathic effect of the virus on lung tissue) and secondary bacterial pneumonia, which may coincide with the primary pulmonary lesion or be a late complication of viral respiratory infection (primarily influenza).
In adults, viruses are the suspected causative agents in one-third of community-acquired pneumonia cases, particularly influenza viruses, rhinoviruses, and coronaviruses, though the relative frequency of different infections may vary significantly over time and across regions. Furthermore, when evaluating the dynamic etiology of viral pneumonia, the variability of diagnostic tests used must be taken into account. Despite being caused by various pathogens, CAP is characterized by common transmission pathways, many stages and pathogenetic features, as well as clinical manifestations [1-7]. The virus almost invariably enters the respiratory tract via airborne droplets. When entering as relatively large droplets, the primary localization of the viral process is the respiratory mucosa, and the development of pneumonia may be associated with the "descending" spread of infection. Alternatively, the virus enters within micro-droplets (generated during forceful sneezing and coughing) and immediately reaches the distal respiratory divisions, which is characteristic of epidemic influenza with a typical hyperacute onset.
To initiate the infectious process, viruses must begin replication in susceptible cells, which can lead to the formation of both complete and defective viral particles. Four possible outcomes of virus-cell interaction are known: cytopathic effect, cytoproliferative effect, formation of viral inclusion bodies, and viral persistence within the cell. The cytopathic effect is best studied in epidemic influenza—active viral replication in various epithelial cells and macrophages leads to characteristic cellular alterations (appearance of "grippe cells") followed by cell death via cytolysis. The cytoproliferative effect is most characteristic of paramyxoviruses, but may also be associated with other pathogens. The intracellular pathogen stimulates either the formation of characteristic cellular proliferations or the appearance of bi- and multinucleated cells. Virus-containing basophilic intranuclear inclusion bodies are characteristic of DNA viral infections (adenovirus and herpes simplex), followed by cell death via apoptosis.
A significant role in the pathogenesis of viral respiratory infections and their accompanying symptoms is played by changes associated with hemodynamic disturbances and other "nonspecific" (i.e., not directly virus-induced) alterations: congestion, petechial hemorrhages, microthrombosis, serous edema, occasionally hyaline membrane formation, and dyselectasis. The severity of these changes correlates with the clinical presentation (both intoxication signs and respiratory failure). The mechanisms of their development are mediated by cytokines, primarily produced by macrophages and associated with endothelial damage. Endothelial lining damage plays a significant role. When such changes reach maximal severity, it is customary to refer to diffuse alveolar damage (adult respiratory distress syndrome, shock lung).
With a prolonged course of the inflammatory process, lymphoid cells appear within the alveolar septa, which, combined with moderate fibrosis, warrants the diagnosis of true interstitial pneumonia [5,6].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
Viral pneumonias are among the most common diseases, occurring at any age and having specific clinical features across various age groups. Viruses enter the human body via airborne droplet or contact transmission [1-4,7].
Annually, about 200 million cases of viral community-acquired pneumonia are registered worldwide: 100 million in children and 100 million in adults. Both men and women are equally affected. In immunocompromised individuals, it develops regardless of age. Viral pneumonia frequently occurs in children under three years of age (even with a good immune system), particularly against the background of infections caused by respiratory syncytial virus. In adults without immune dysfunction, CAP most commonly has a mild course [1-4,7].
In 2020, the incidence of community-acquired pneumonia increased more than 3.5-fold compared to the previous year, with a rate of 1,856.2 per 100,000 population against a long-term average incidence of 397.4 (2011–2020). Meanwhile, the incidence of viral pneumonia increased more than 100-fold relative to the previous year, reaching 783.08 per 100,000 population compared to 7.2 per 100,000 population in 2019. In 2021, the incidence of community-acquired pneumonia (rate of 1,148.43 per 100,000 population) increased 2.9-fold compared to the long-term average (LTA of 391.82) (in 2020 – 1,856.18). The incidence of viral pneumonia (265.06 per 100,000 population) increased 45.1-fold relative to the LTA (5.88) (in 2020 – 783.08). This situation is explained by the fact that in 2020, cases of community-acquired pneumonia caused by the novel coronavirus infection were recorded in the federal statistical observation form No. 2 "Information on Infectious and Parasitic Diseases" together with community-acquired viral pneumonia. Starting in 2021, cases of pneumonia caused by the novel coronavirus have been registered separately, which prevents a reliable assessment of the difference in incidence rates over the past two years. In 2022, the total number of registered community-acquired pneumonia cases decreased to pre-COVID levels (2022 rate – 407.29 per 100,000 population). In 2023, the incidence of community-acquired pneumonia (the rate was 498.02 per 100,000 population) increased both compared to the previous year and relative to the LTA. The incidence growth rate relative to the previous year was 22%, and the long-term average incidence was exceeded by 25% (LTA – 398.41 per 100,000 population). Until 2020, bacterial pneumonia predominated in the structure of verified community-acquired pneumonia, but with the onset of the novel coronavirus pandemic, the situation changed. The incidence of viral pneumonia (62.40 per 100,000 population) relative to the LTA (5.88) increased 10.6-fold in 2022 and decreased 4.2-fold relative to the previous year (in 2021 – 265.06). The number of coronavirus-induced pneumonia cases also decreased significantly due to the predominance of the Omicron variant, which mainly affects the upper respiratory tract. In the structure of laboratory-confirmed cases of community-acquired pneumonia in 2022, the proportion of viral pneumonia accounted for 15.32% of the total number, and bacterial pneumonia for 12.30%. In 2023, a significant 2.3-fold decrease in the incidence of viral pneumonia was noted (the rate was 62.4 per 100,000 population in 2022 and 26.98 per 100,000 population in 2023) [8].
The highest number of deaths from community-acquired pneumonia in adults and children in the Russian Federation was recorded in 2020, which is explained by the dominance during this period of the circulating Delta coronavirus, which predominantly affects the lower respiratory tract [8].
In most cases, CAP is characterized by a mild course; however, in elderly and senile individuals, or in the presence of concomitant bronchopulmonary, cardiovascular diseases, or immunodeficiency, it can be associated with the development of severe, life-threatening complications. In 10-30% of patients with pneumonia, mixed or co-infection occurs, which may be caused by a combination of various bacterial pathogens (S. pneumoniae with H. influenzae or M. pneumoniae), or their combination with respiratory viruses. Viral pneumonias caused by pathogen associations are characterized by a more severe course and an unfavorable prognosis [1-7].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
I. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10):
J12: Viral pneumonia, not elsewhere classified
J12.0 Adenoviral pneumonia
J12.1 Respiratory syncytial virus pneumonia
J12.2 Parainfluenza virus pneumonia
J12.3 Pneumonia due to human metapneumovirus
J12.8 Other viral pneumonia
J12.9 Viral pneumonia, unspecified
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
[1-7].
I. Etiological classification of viral pneumonia indicating the pathogen):
Common causes of viral pneumonia:
influenza viruses type A, B;
respiratory syncytial virus;
adenovirus;
parainfluenza virus;
Sometimes caused by:
SARS-CoV virus – causes severe acute respiratory syndrome;
MERS-CoV coronavirus – causes Middle East respiratory syndrome;
SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus – causes the novel coronavirus infection COVID-19.
Rare causes include:
varicella-zoster virus, rubella virus, herpes simplex virus – in newborns;
cytomegalovirus infection – in immunocompromised individuals;
hantavirus.
II. According to clinical and morphological characteristics:
parenchymal (alveolar): lobar, focal (bacterial)
interstitial (viral)
mixed (viral-bacterial)
III. Classification of pneumonia by setting of acquisition:
community-acquired pneumonia – develops outside the hospital or within the first two days after hospitalization;
nosocomial (hospital-acquired) pneumonia – develops two days or more after hospitalization.
IV. Classification of pneumonia by localization and extent:
subsegmental: affects less than one pulmonary segment;
segmental: affects one or several segments;
lobar: affects a pulmonary lobe;
unilateral: affects one lung (left-sided, right-sided);
bilateral: affects both lungs;
total.
V. Classification of pneumonia by severity (description of severity grades in Appendix A3)
non-severe
severe
VI. Disease course:
• acute (up to 3–4 weeks)
• protracted (more than 3–4 weeks)
VII. Complications associated with the course of viral pneumonia:
acute respiratory failure;
acute respiratory distress syndrome;
secondary (bacterial) pneumonia.
VIII. Complications associated with the development of secondary (bacterial) pneumonia:
acute respiratory failure;
acute respiratory distress syndrome
septic shock;
sepsis
pleurisy and pleural empyema (purulent pleurisy);
lung abscess;
meningitis;
myocardial dystrophy and myocarditis, etc.
Below is an example of a clinical diagnosis formulation:
Primary disease: influenza A H1N1, severe course, viral lung injury.
Complications: ARF.
Primary disease: novel coronavirus infection COVID-19 (confirmed), severe course. Bilateral viral lung injury (CT-3, 60%). U07.1
Complications: ARDS, ARF. Nosocomial destructive pneumonia caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae.
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
In most cases the development of viral pneumonia is preceded by ARVI symptoms. The disease typically begins acutely with the onset of toxindromic manifestations (fever up to subfebrile or febrile levels, generalized weakness, headache, myalgia, and arthralgia), as well as catarrhal (catarrhal-respiratory) syndrome—development of cough, rhinorrhea, and in some cases conjunctivitis [11].
With the progression of viral lung injury and at the peak of the infection's clinical manifestations, the main symptom is progressive dyspnea exceeding 30 respiratory movements per minute (acute respiratory failure). Clinical symptoms: diffuse cyanosis, tachycardia, patient agitation rapidly replaced by apathy, possible loss of consciousness, and a drop in systolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg. Cough with scant bloody sputum (sputum shows mononuclearocytosis).
In a retrospective analysis, T. Ishiguro demonstrated that symptoms such as sore throat, fever, dyspnea, and dry cough were more common in patients with a confirmed diagnosis of viral pneumonia than in patients with other conditions [61].
The development of secondary (bacterial) pneumonia should be suspected:
When fever persists (body temperature above 37.5°C) for more than 3–4 days despite adequate antiviral therapy.
When a second wave of fever appears in combination with a productive cough and chest pain.
When coughing is combined with chest pain, or chest pain associated with breathing in the absence of a cough.
When shortness of breath occurs during normal physical exertion.
In case of localized dullness of percussion note and/or localized moist rales (foci of crepitation).
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Distinctive features of viral pneumonia:
1. At the onset – a typical picture of acute respiratory viral infection (ARVI), minimal auscultatory changes, minimal changes on chest radiography.
2. "Rapid" progression of the disease course.
3. Development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
4. Absence of leukocytosis and significant elevation of CRP.
Diagnostic criteria
To verify the viral genesis of pneumonia, it is necessary[1]:
1) clarify the epidemiological history (whether the patient had contact with an ARVI patient in their environment or family, whether the patient or their contacts and relatives were abroad in the preceding 14 days,
2) test sputum (or, in its absence, a combined respiratory swab) using PCR for influenza and coronavirus infection to confirm and identify the viral etiology of the disease (upon hospitalization: mandatory for everyone on the day of admission or the following morning after hospitalization).
3) All patients, during home visits, emergency room examinations, etc., must have their saturation measured with a pulse oximeter; hospitalization is recommended if influenza is suspected.
4) For all patients examined at home or admitted to the emergency department of a medical organization (including in an infectious diseases department) – perform chest radiography (anteroposterior + lateral view), pulse oximetry (with recording of results in the patient's medical record!) and prescribe a complete blood count with leukocyte differential (viral pneumonia is characterized by leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and lymphopenia). There are no pathognomonic anamnestic features or physical examination findings for diagnosing viral pneumonia as opposed to bacterial pneumonia. Clinical, radiological, and laboratory data commonly used for differential diagnosis are presented in Appendix A3.
[1] Letter of the Russian Ministry of Health dated 06.03.2020 N 30-4/I/2-2702 "On the distribution of the algorithm for providing medical care to the adult population with community-acquired pneumonia"
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
It is recommended that all patients with suspected CAP be evaluated for main symptoms indicating pulmonary involvement: high fever, dry cough, onset of dyspnea, and chest pain. Account for the general intoxication syndrome in combination: general malaise, fatigue, weakness, sweating, nausea, vomiting, convulsions, and loss of consciousness for the clinical diagnosis of CAP [1-4,7,9-11].
It is recommended to pay attention to the presence of an epidemic surge in the incidence of ARVI, influenza, and novel coronavirus infection, contacts with patients with viral infections, and outbreaks in organized groups during the epidemic season for the clinical diagnosis of the disease [1-4,7,9-11].
GCR CLOC 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended that all patients with suspected CAP be checked for a history of vaccination against influenza and SARS-CoV-2 infection to identify the risk of developing this disease [1-4,7,9-11].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended that all patients with suspected CAP determine the risk factors for severe and complicated disease progression [1]: age 65 years and older; individuals with concomitant chronic diseases of the bronchopulmonary system, cardiovascular system, diabetes mellitus, kidney, blood, and nervous system diseases (epilepsy, myopathies, etc.); individuals with immunosuppression (including HIV and use of immunosuppressants); pregnant women; patients with morbid obesity (body mass index >40 kg/m2); individuals living in nursing homes and other closed-type institutions [1-4,7,9-11].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
[1] SanPiN 3.3686-21 "Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for the prevention of infectious diseases. XXXIV. Prevention of influenza and other acute respiratory viral infections (Decree of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation No. 2 dated 28.01.2021)].
2.2 Physical Examination
It is recommended that all patients undergo mandatory thermometry (in case of normothermia, the timing and frequency of antipyretic administration over the past 24 hours are clarified) [1-4,7,9-13].
GCR CLOC 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended that all patients undergo pulse oximetry (SpO2) to detect respiratory failure (RF) and assess the severity of hypoxemia [1-4,7,9-13].
GCR CLOC 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: pulse oximetry is a simple and reliable screening method that allows for the detection of patients with hypoxemia in need of respiratory support and the assessment of its efficacy
It is recommended that all patients begin with a general physical examination assessing the skin and visible mucous membranes: color (hyperemia, pallor, cyanosis), moisture, edema, scleral injection, conjunctivitis, nasal breathing, signs of rhinitis, and inspection of the oropharynx to detect hyperemia of the palatine arches and/or the posterior oropharyngeal wall, tonsils, laxity and granularity of the posterior pharyngeal wall mucosa, presence of mucous coating, enlargement of lymphoid follicles on the posterior pharyngeal wall, to identify symptoms of viral infection [1-4,7,9-11].
GPP CLoE 5Level of recommendation evidence C (level of data reliability – 5)
It is recommended that all patients undergo a pulmonary examination: [1-4,7,9-11].
− chest palpation with determination of vocal fremitus;
− comparative percussion of the lungs − to detect possible changes in the percussion note (symptom of pulmonary tissue consolidation);
− lung auscultation − to detect pathological respiratory sounds (dry and moist rales, crepitation, and their prevalence), bronchophony, and assessment of inspiration and expiration phases.
Comments:
1. Vocal fremitus and bronchophony (increased resonance of voice sounds heard during auscultation) − enhanced over the affected lung area.
2. Percussion note − shortening (dullness) of the percussion note over the affected lung area; asymmetry of the percussion sound when comparing symmetrical areas of both lungs indicates consolidation and/or pleural effusion.
3. Breathing − locally audible bronchial breathing with weakened inspiration, and prolonged, enhanced expiration.
4. Rales − locally determined resonant fine moist rales and/or crepitation, "pleural friction rub" phenomenon.
These signs, detected during direct examination of the patient, indicate changes in the area of pneumonic infiltration (alveolar exudation, focus of bacterial pneumonia)
GoR CLoE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended that all patients undergo a direct cardiac examination: measurement of pulse and blood pressure, auscultation (detection of tachycardia, bradycardia, heart murmurs, muffled heart sounds, etc.) to determine the severity of the disease, presence of complications, and comorbid conditions [1-4,7,9-11].
GoR CLoE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
2.3.1. Nonspecific laboratory diagnostics
It is recommended that all patients undergo a complete (clinical) blood count with determination of red blood cells, hematocrit, leukocytes, platelets, and leukocyte differential for a comprehensive assessment of disease severity, timely detection of complications and emergency conditions, and exclusion of bacterial-induced complications [1-4,7,9-13].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: uncomplicated viral infection is typically characterized by normocytosis or leukopenia, neutropenia, eosinopenia, relative lymphocytosis, and monocytosis. In bacterial complications (pneumonia, sinusitis, etc.), blood tests show increasing leukocytosis, stab neutrophilia, and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Interstitial viral lung involvement is characterized by leukopenia, neutrophilia with a stab shift, anemia, and thrombocytopenia.
It is recommended that all patients with CAP at all levels of medical care undergo quantitative determination of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels for differential diagnosis with bacterial pneumonia, and assessment of severity and prognosis [1-4,7,9-13,63]
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: CRP levels correlate with disease severity, extent of inflammatory infiltration, and prognosis in CAP. At a CRP concentration >100 mg/L, its specificity in confirming a diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia exceeds 90%. Conversely, at a CRP concentration <20 mg/L, the diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia is unlikely.
It is recommended that all patients with CAP undergo a general (clinical) urinalysis to detect renal dysfunction and decompensation of comorbid conditions [1-4,7,9-13]
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: in an uncomplicated viral infection, there are no pathological changes; in cases of pronounced fever or intoxication syndrome, an increase in urine specific gravity, mild transient leukocyturia, proteinuria, and cylindruria may occur, which disappear upon normalization of body temperature and relief of general infectious intoxication symptoms.
It is recommended that all hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia undergo a general clinical blood chemistry panel, including the determination of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, amylase, glucose, urea, creatinine, myoglobin, albumin, creatine kinase, and lactate dehydrogenase activities, to detect organ failure, identify decompensation of comorbidities, and to prescribe and adjust pharmacotherapy [1-4,7,9-13,64,65,66].
Level of Evidence: 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: detected abnormalities may indicate organ dysfunction, decompensation of concomitant diseases, and the development of complications, which influences the choice of medications and their dosing regimen [64]. An increase in LDH, CK, and myoglobin concentrations may indicate viral lung damage in the context of severe influenza. The determination of these parameters can be used both for additional diagnostic purposes (an increase in myoglobin concentration [infectious rhabdomyolysis] is accompanied by the development of acute kidney injury) and to decide on the use of extracorporeal detoxification methods [65,66].
It is recommended that all hospitalized patients with severe and complicated viral pneumonia undergo a coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis assay): activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (Quick's test), thrombin time and/or fibrinogen, and D-dimer (quantitative method) for a comprehensive assessment of disease severity and the prescription of therapy [1-4,7,9-11].
Level of Evidence: 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: an increase in D-dimer 3–4 times above the age-adjusted normal limit, prolongation of prothrombin time, especially in severe cases (decrease in prothrombin %), and an elevation of fibrinogen are of clinical significance.
It is recommended to test for inflammatory response markers (fibrinogen, procalcitonin, troponin, ferritin) in patients with severe and complicated community-acquired pneumonia to assess the severity of the clinical course and the prognosis of the disease [12-16,67,68].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: as a "decision-making threshold" indicating a bacterial infection, it is recommended to use a PCT level of 0.5 ng/mL and higher. In severe cases of the disease, determining PCT alongside CRP is mandatory. The PCT level correlates with the severity of pneumonia [67] and can serve as an additional criterion (alongside CRP) for differential diagnosis between viral lung injury and secondary (bacterial) pneumonia. In lung injury in patients with SARS-CoV-2 or acute interstitial pneumonia — AIP (in systemic connective tissue diseases — rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, etc., "methotrexate lung", etc.), high CRP levels and leukocytosis are frequently observed, yet the PCT level remains within normal limits [7,50–52,62,63,66,67,68].
It is recommended for all hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia and signs of acute respiratory failure (SpO2 <92% on room air by pulse oximetry) to undergo an acid-base balance and blood gas analysis, determining paO2, paCO2, pH, bicarbonates, and lactate to assess the presence and severity of respiratory failure and metabolic disorders, and to optimize respiratory support [12,16,17,18,19].
Level of Evidence 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Measurement of paO2, paCO2, pH, and bicarbonates allows for a more precise determination of the presence and severity of respiratory failure and metabolic disorders, and helps optimize respiratory support. An elevated arterial blood lactate level is a marker of hypoperfusion and an unfavorable prognosis in severe community-acquired pneumonia.
2.3.2. Specific laboratory diagnostics
Laboratory testing to identify the causative agent of influenza and acute respiratory infection is mandatory in the following cases [1]:
- in outpatient settings — for all individuals with symptoms of a influenza-like illness who sought medical care no later than 2 days
- upon hospitalization of a patient for acute respiratory viral infections of the upper and lower respiratory tracts (severe and unusual forms of the disease) (inpatient care settings);
- for individuals at high risk for an unfavorable outcome of influenza and acute respiratory viral infections (pregnant women, persons with chronic heart or lung diseases, metabolic syndrome, immunodeficiencies, individuals over 60 years of age, and others) (outpatient care settings);
- upon registration of outbreaks of acute respiratory viral infections with multiple cases in organized adult communities with 5 or more affected individuals within a single incubation period, or illness in individuals from round-the-clock residential institutions (outpatient care settings)
It is recommended that patients with community-acquired pneumonia undergo rapid diagnostic tests to identify the causative agent of acute respiratory viral infections in order to timely prescribe etiotropic therapy [1-4,7,9-12].
Comments: use of rapid immunochromatographic assays (ICA) for the presence of influenza A and B virus antigens, respiratory syncytial virus, adenovirus, and SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (rapid immunochromatographic testing of a nasopharyngeal swab for influenza A virus, influenza B virus, Human Adenovirus, Human Respiratory Syncytial virus, and SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus) in patients who sought medical care no later than 2 days from the onset of symptoms.
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that patients with community-acquired pneumonia undergo etiological laboratory diagnostics using nucleic acid amplification methods (PCR, LAMP, etc.) for the presence of nucleic acids of acute respiratory viral infection, influenza, and SARS-CoV-2 pathogens in nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs to identify the causative agent [1-4,7,9-12].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Molecular biological testing of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, influenza A and B viruses (Influenza virus A, B), molecular biological testing of swabs from the nasopharynx and oropharynx for parainfluenza viruses (Human Parainfluenza virus), rhinoviruses (Human Rhinovirus), adenovirus (Human Adenovirus), respiratory syncytial virus (Human Respiratory Syncytial virus), coronaviruses 229E, OC43, NL63, HKUI (Human Coronavirus), bocavirus (Human Bocavirus), metapneumovirus (Human Metapneumovirus) — identification of viruses most frequently causing upper and lower respiratory tract infections for differential diagnosis, in order to prescribe etiotropic therapy for the timely prevention of severe disease progression and complications. When lower respiratory tract disease is suspected, an examination of sputum, tracheal or pharyngeal aspirates, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid is performed. This is the most effective method, allowing the detection of viral nucleic acids on average up to 7 days, and maximally up to 2 weeks from disease onset (provided upper respiratory tract involvement signs persist). Results are obtained within 4–6 hours after sample submission.
It is recommended that if criteria for bacterial pneumonia are met, patient examination and treatment be carried out in accordance with approved clinical guidelines for community-acquired (nosocomial) pneumonia [13].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: the criteria for establishing a diagnosis of bacterial community-acquired pneumonia are determined by the presence in the patient of radiologically confirmed focal infiltration of lung tissue and at least two clinical symptoms and signs from the following list [69].
1. acutely onset fever at the beginning of the disease (fever above 38 degrees Celsius, productive cough with or without purulent sputum);
2. physical signs (focus of crepitation / fine moist rales, bronchial breathing, dullness on percussion);
3. leukocytosis >10 × 109 /L, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) >50 mg/L.
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
[1] SanPiN 3.3686-21 "Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for the prevention of infectious diseases. XXXIV. Prevention of influenza and other acute respiratory viral infections" (Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation No. 2 dated January 28, 2021)
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
It is recommended to perform a 2-view chest X-ray (posteroanterior and right lateral) in all patients with suspected community-acquired pneumonia, symptoms of bronchitis (to rule out focal pneumonia), and physical signs of lung tissue involvement in order to establish a diagnosis and detect complications [10,11,13,63,69].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: signs most indicative of viral pneumonia include the following: [63,96]
- Interstitial infiltrates – "ground-glass opacities" are observed when inflammatory exudate fills the interalveolar spaces;
- uneven distribution of interstitial infiltrates;
- bilateral widespread infiltrates;
- pneumonia-like syndrome with a normal chest X-ray (they usually lack distinct physical examination symptoms and may not be visible on radiography).
Respiratory viruses (influenza, SARS-CoV-2, etc.) are most frequently associated with diffuse bilateral "ground-glass" lung lesions.
Signs indicative of bacterial pneumonia include the following:
- alveolar infiltrates (the main radiological sign of bacterial CAP is a focal localized decrease in lung airlessness (infiltration) due to the accumulation of inflammatory exudate in the respiratory divisions);
- lobar consolidation (when inflammatory exudate fills the air-containing alveoli, alveolar sacs, alveolar ducts, and respiratory bronchioles within a lung lobe);
- the presence of limited unilateral involvement in the form of a lung tissue consolidation area increases the probability of bacterial pneumonia.
- density of nodules (micronodules);
- pleural effusion.
It is recommended that chest CT [69-72] be performed for all patients with specific indications in non-severe CAP and as the method of choice in complicated, severe CAP.
Comments: Chest CT has higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing CAP compared to chest radiography. Chest CT is recommended for patients with a high clinical and laboratory probability of CAP, but with no infiltration on chest radiography, as well as when obtaining images that cannot be unequivocally interpreted as pneumonia-induced infiltration. CT signs of viral pneumonia: frequently encountered bilateral lung involvement with "ground-glass opacities", their localization, consolidation, more often with a bilateral process, thickening of the interlobular septa or "crazy-paving" pattern, "reversed halo" sign, and reticular changes.
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
It is recommended that all hospitalized patients with CAP undergo standard 12-lead electrocardiography to rule out CAP complications, detect comorbid conditions, and select a safe drug therapy regimen, including antibiotic therapy according to indications [69].
Comments: the risk of rhythm disorders, acute coronary syndrome, and decompensation of chronic comorbidities increases. Their timely detection and correction affect the patient's prognosis. In addition, a number of ECG changes – QT interval prolongation, early ventricular repolarization syndrome – affect the choice of medicinal products and antibacterial drugs.
GPP CGrade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence − 5).
2.5 Other Procedures
It is recommended to consult allied specialists for patients in cases of suspected complications: a pulmonologist (in the presence of signs of pneumonia), an otolaryngologist (in the presence of sinusitis, otitis media), a neurologist (upon development of encephalopathy), a cardiologist (if symptoms of myocarditis or acute cardiovascular failure develop), an obstetrician-gynecologist (if CAP develops against the background of pregnancy) to determine further management tactics [1-4,7].
Level of recommendation C (LoR C)Level of evidence 5 (LoE 5)Level of recommendation C (level of reliable evidence – 5).
It is recommended that all patients with signs of progressive acute respiratory failure ((RR >25 breaths/min, SpO2 <92% on room air) and multiorgan dysfunction (SOFA score ≥2) undergo a consultation with an anesthesiologist-intensivist to select the optimal method of respiratory support and address the issue of transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) [1-4,7, 16,17].
Level of recommendation C (LoR C)Level of evidence 5 (LoE 5)Level of recommendation C (level of reliable evidence – 5).
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
The principles of treatment for patients with CAP involve addressing the following tasks:
suppression of viral replication in the early stages of the disease (antiviral therapy);
preventing the further progression of the pathological process caused by the disease, achieving a complete and stable recovery;
prevention of potential disease complications;
consideration of optimal therapeutic (antimicrobial therapy) management for patients presenting with criteria for bacterial infection and/or coinfection [94].
Treatment tactics are influenced by the following factors [1-7]: stage of the disease; severity of the disease; clinical form of the disease; leading clinical manifestations and course features considering signs of immunodeficiency (chronic alcoholism, cachexia, severe comorbid pathology, old age); patient's age; presence and nature of complications; availability and feasibility of treatment in accordance with the required type of medical care.
Information regarding doses, indications for use, and routes of administration of medications contained in these guidelines may differ from the information specified in the summary of product characteristics (SPC). For complete information on the use of a particular medicinal product, consult the SPC. Personal responsibility for the interpretation and use of these guidelines rests with the attending physician.
Diagnostic testing for viral infections (primarily influenza, COVID-19) must under no circumstances delay the initiation of systemic antiviral therapy and infection control procedures.
3.1. Conservative management
3.1.1. Etiotropic (antiviral therapy)
It is recommended to prescribe antiviral drugs to patients with CAP no later than 48 hours after the onset of the disease to stop viral replication: the first line consists of direct-acting antiviral drugs, the second line consists of immunotropic drugs with indirect antiviral action (L03AB – interferons, L03AX – other immunostimulants, A13A – general tonics) [1-4,7,9-12,63,69].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: prescribed depending on the etiology. Early administration of antiviral drugs in acute respiratory viral infections to suppress viral replication prevents severe disease progression and the risk of complications. In established CAP, rapid viral load reduction prevents severe lung damage. The appropriateness of prescribing antiviral drugs is determined by the physician individually for each patient. Regimens and doses are detailed in the treatment section of the clinical guidelines: "ARVI in adults", "Influenza in adults", and the temporary methodological recommendations "Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19)" version 18 [9 -12].
3.1.2. Pathogenetic and symptomatic therapy
It is recommended to perform mandatory basic therapy for all patients regardless of disease severity [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: Basic therapy includes bed rest, diet, and heavy fluid intake. In the absence of digestive system diseases and contraindications for a specialized diet, diet table No. 15 is indicated. The diet includes easily digestible foods rich in vitamins (lean meats, fish, dairy products, fruits, vegetables, juices, compotes). Alcohol in any form is prohibited.
The organization of therapeutic dietary nutrition for patients with CAP during inpatient treatment in medical organizations is carried out in accordance with the orders of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated August 5, 2003, No. 330 "On measures to improve therapeutic nutrition in healthcare institutions of the Russian Federation", dated June 21, 2013, No. 395n "On approval of therapeutic nutrition standards", and dated September 23, 2020, No. 1008n "On approval of the procedure for providing patients with therapeutic nutrition".
It is recommended to prescribe Meglumine sodium succinate** to patients with lung injury for antihypoxic and antioxidant purposes to relieve intoxication syndrome [21,22].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: Excessive fluid loading in viral lung injury will aggravate the patient's condition.
Administer intravenously by drip at a rate of 1-4.5 ml/min (up to 90 drops per minute). The average daily dose is 10 ml/kg. The course of therapy is up to 11 days. The volume and duration depend on the patient's severity.
It is recommended to prescribe nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs to patients with hyperthermia above 38°C, muscle and joint pain for antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory purposes [1,2,4,7,23-30]
LEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: the use of NSAIDs can be recommended solely for symptomatic purposes to achieve antipyretic and analgesic effects. Prescribing them as a long-term course is impractical. Furthermore, from a practical standpoint, it should be borne in mind that prescribing NSAIDs may disorient the physician in assessing the efficacy of ongoing therapy. Recommended for use: paracetamol** 500 mg–1 g up to 4 times a day (maximum daily dose – 4 g), ibuprofen** 400 mg 3 times a day (maximum daily dose – 1200 mg), combined drug forms: paracetamol in combination with ibuprofen (ibuprofen + paracetamol).
It is recommended to prescribe antitussive drugs in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia presenting with a dry, non-productive, hacking cough that significantly impairs the patient's quality of life (pain syndrome, sleep disturbance) for symptomatic purposes (butamirate, levodropropizine, a combination of antibodies to bradykinin, morphine, and histamine – Rengalin, or dextromethorphan (as part of fixed-dose combinations)) [1-4,7,28,32-44].
GPP BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comments: The drugs of choice are:
Dextromethorphan (included in multicomponent drugs);
Butamirate – orally, 15 ml 4 times a day (syrup).
Levodropropizine – orally, between meals, for adults and children over 12 years of age – 60 mg (10 ml of syrup or 20 drops, preferably diluted in half a glass of water) 1–3 times a day at intervals of at least 6 hours
Renalgin 1–2 tablets (or 5–10 ml of oral solution) 3 times a day, independently of meals. Depending on the severity of the condition, during the first three days, the frequency of administration may be increased to 4–6 times a day. The duration of therapy depends on the severity of the disease and is determined by the attending physician. Not recommended for hereditary fructose intolerance. The efficacy and safety of the drug have not been studied in pregnant and lactating women
It is recommended to prescribe mucolytic and expectorant drugs to patients with a productive cough, as well as signs of bronchial obstruction, to liquefy and improve sputum clearance [1- 4,7,28,32-44].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: various mucolytic agents, including herbal medicines, may be used only in the presence of a productive cough.
Synthetic mucolytic agents:
Acetylcysteine** – orally 600 mg/day, course up to 5-7 days
Bromhexine – orally 8 mg (1-2 tablets) 3-4 times a day;
Ambroxol** – orally 90 mg/day, sustained-release form 75 mg/day, course up to 14 days;
Ambroxol + Sodium Glycyrrhizinate (glycyrrhizic acid trisodium salt) + Creeping Thyme herb extract (liquid thyme extract) – orally 40 ml/day (10 ml in 4 doses).
Ambroxol + Sodium glycyrrhizinate (glycyrrhizic acid trisodium salt) + Lanceleaf Thermopsis herb extract + Sodium bicarbonate – 1 tablet 3 times a day.
It is not recommended to simultaneously use expectorants and antitussives in patients with cough, as this may contribute to sputum stasis due to suppression of the cough reflex [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
It is recommended to prescribe a combination of a short-acting beta-2 agonist (SABA) and a short-acting anticholinergic (SAMA) in patients with bronchoobstructive syndrome associated with bronchospasm [45,46].
Level of Evidence CLevel of Consensus/Evidence C (level of proof - 5).
Comments: it is recommended to prescribe combinations of #Fenoterol and Ipratropium bromide** in the form of a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) at a dose of 50 mcg/20 mcg (1-2 puffs) up to 3-4 times a day or in the form of a nebulizer solution at a dose of 0.5 mg/ml + 0.25 mg/ml (1-2 ml) up to 3-4 times a day
It is recommended to prescribe a combined drug containing ambroxol, guaifenesin, and levosalbutamol in adults for the symptomatic treatment of productive cough, especially in the presence of signs of bronchial obstruction [47-50].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: used as an oral solution, 10 ml 3 times a day for 2 weeks
Antibacterial drugs
Systemic antibacterial drugs are not recommended for uncomplicated disease courses; however, if ARDS develops and a secondary bacterial infection joins according to specific criteria, prescribing antibacterial drugs becomes an obligatory component of therapy [1-4,7,8-12].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
The treatment of bacterial pneumonia is not covered in these guidelines and should be managed in accordance with clinical guidelines for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults!
It is recommended to prescribe systemic glucocorticosteroids (#dexamethasone**, #methylprednisolone**) to viral pneumonia patients presenting with acute respiratory failure [51-55].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Glucocorticosteroids (GCS) are the drugs of choice for treating patients with a cytokine storm; they suppress all phases of inflammation and the synthesis of a wide range of pro-inflammatory mediators, whose increased concentration during a cytokine storm is associated with an unfavorable prognosis in COVID-19 and the risk of developing ARDS.
For the treatment of moderate and severe viral pneumonia with respiratory failure, various GCS administration regimens can be used: #dexamethasone** at a dose of 6–20 mg/day intravenously in 1–2 administrations depending on the patient's severity; #methylprednisolone** at 125 mg/administration intravenously every 12 hours or as a single bolus of 250–500 mg/administration intravenously.
The maximum GCS dose is used for 3–4 days and then tapered upon stabilization (resolution of fever, stable decrease in CRP levels, ALT and/or AST activity, serum LDH) by 20–25% per administration/day over the first 2 days, and subsequently by 50% every 1–2 days until complete discontinuation. GCS therapy for more than 10 days is not recommended.
Patients receiving GCS must be monitored for side effects. These include hyperglycemia, arterial hypertension, and erosive and ulcerative lesions of the upper gastrointestinal tract.
GCS must be used with caution in cases of: diabetes mellitus, essential hypertension, gastric and duodenal ulcer disease, obesity, signs of an active bacterial infection, and thrombotic disorders.
It is recommended that all viral pneumonia patients with signs of acute respiratory failure undergo oxygen therapy to prevent and eliminate hypoxia [1-4,7,56-60,102-109].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: upon the appearance of signs of acute respiratory failure (SpO2 <92%), oxygen inhalation via nasal catheters or face masks must be provided. Depending on the clinical situation (degree of hypoxemia, response to oxygen therapy), various oxygen delivery systems are used: low-flow nasal cannulas (FiO2 = 0.25–0.4); a face mask (FiO2 = 0.35–0.5), or high-flow nasal cannulas using high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) devices. Start with a medium flow rate (5–7 L/min), increasing up to 10 L/min if necessary to ensure an acceptable level of blood oxygenation (PaO2 >60 mm Hg, SpO2 >92%).
It is recommended that all patients with viral pneumonia and severe gas exchange disorders undergo tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation (MV) to ensure adequate gas exchange [1-4,7,56-60,102-109]
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: The main indications for invasive mechanical ventilation are respiratory arrest, impaired consciousness, psychomotor agitation, hemodynamic disorders, the inability to ensure airway patency and a tight mask seal, a high risk of aspiration, a respiratory rate >35 breaths/min, PaO2/FiO2 <300 mm Hg, and an increase in PaCO2 >20% from baseline or greater than 60 mm Hg.
Goals of respiratory support:
- Correction of gas exchange disorders (achieving PaO2 within 55–80 mm Hg, SaO2 – 88–95%);
- Minimization of the risk of barotrauma and volutrauma;
- Optimization of alveolar recruitment;
- Early weaning of the patient from the ventilator;
- Implementation of a set of special measures aimed at limiting the risk of virus transmission from the patient to staff and other patients.
It is recommended in extremely severe cases of ARDS to perform extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to ensure adequate gas exchange [60,110-113].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: The rapid progression of ARDS dictates the need for early contact with a center that has ECMO capabilities. ECMO is performed in departments with experience using this technology: hospitals that have specialists, including surgeons and perfusionists, proficient in cannulation techniques and ECMO setup.
Potential indications for ECMO:
- Refractory persistent* hypoxemia: PO2/FiO2 <50 mmHg (despite FiO2 >0.8 + PEEP (≤20 cm H2O) at Pplat = 32 cm H2O + prone positioning +/- inhaled NO);
- Plateau pressure ≥35 cm H2O (despite reducing PEEP to 5 cm H2O and lowering Vt to the minimum value (4 mL/kg) and pH ≥7.15).
* The persistence pattern depends on the dynamics of the process (a few hours for rapidly progressive conditions and up to 48 hours in case of stabilization).
Contraindications to ECMO:
- Severe comorbid conditions with a life expectancy of no more than 5 years;
- Multiple organ failure and SAPS II >90 points or SOFA >15 points;
- Non-pharmacological coma (due to stroke);
- Inability to establish venous or arterial access;
- Body mass index >40 kg/m2.
It is recommended to prescribe exogenous surfactant (R07AA Pulmonary surfactants) to patients with severe ARDS and refractory hypoxemia to correct its deficiency [13,60,65,66,69,74,75,100,101].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
3.2. Surgical treatment
Not performed
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
It is recommended to initiate the early stage of rehabilitation already in the acute period of the disease [1-4,7,76-88].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
Comments: the initial stage of rehabilitation is usually carried out in an inpatient setting and coincides with the onset of the acute phase of the disease. If necessary, initial-stage interventions are performed in the ICU. Interventions at this stage aim to prevent the development of respiratory failure, restore and maintain natural breathing, improve the drainage function of the lungs, activate respiratory muscles, normalize gas exchange and other lung tissue functions, and prevent early complications. Reflexology is not used at this stage
It is recommended to start the developing stage of rehabilitation after the end of the acute period of pneumonia, conducting it in both inpatient and outpatient settings [1-4,7,76-88].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
Comments: the developing stage of rehabilitation is aimed at restoring normal pulmonary ventilation, preventing the decline of external respiration functions, developing respiratory muscles, preventing the development of congestion, pulmonary fibrosis, and other signs of chronic pulmonary diseases
It is recommended to subsequently conduct the training stage of rehabilitation to restore external respiration functions, strengthen respiratory muscles, improve the functional state of the respiratory system, prevent respiratory diseases, and increase overall resistance to infectious and other adverse factors [1-4,7,76-88].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
It is recommended to prescribe adaptogenic drugs with an anti-asthenic purpose to patients with viral and post-viral asthenia syndrome, regardless of severity, form of the infectious process, and disease period [89-93].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: oxyethylammonium methylphenoxyacetate has both immunomodulatory and adaptogenic properties. Administer orally on the first day 3 tablets (600 mg) per day, for the subsequent 7 days 1 tablet (200 mg) per day. Total course dose is 10 tablets (total dose 2000 mg), course duration is 8 days.
It is recommended to implement a comprehensive approach to rehabilitation measures involving various specialists and applying diverse methods of intervention based on prevailing symptoms and syndromes [1-4,7,76-88].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
It is recommended to maintain consistency and continuity of the measures performed to ensure uninterrupted care across various stages of rehabilitation and health check-ups (dispensary observation) [1-4,7,76-88].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
It is recommended that rehabilitation and restorative interventions are adequate to the adaptive and reserve capabilities of the patient [1-4,7,76-88].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
Comments: Gradual increase in dosed physical and mental stress, as well as the differentiated application of various impact methods, are important.
It is recommended to continuously monitor the effectiveness of the interventions performed. [1-4,7,76-88].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
Comments: the rate and degree of restoration of the functional state and occupationally significant functions of convalescents are taken into account (using indirect and direct methods).
It is recommended to use non-pharmacological therapy methods in patients with CAP at the rehabilitation stage [1-4,7,76-88].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
Comments:
1. Inspiratory training—breathing exercises for coronavirus-induced lung damage, resulting from alveolar injury, to improve pulmonary ventilation capacity, breathing mechanics, and respiratory muscle function. The use of volume- and flow-motivated incentive spirometers is rational
2. Vibration and percussion therapy – a method combining the mechanical impact of high-frequency vibration and compression on the chest wall.
3. Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation—a method combining non-invasive mechanical ventilation, recruitment of poorly ventilated lung areas with subsequent improvement in ventilation homogeneity and normalization of ventilation-perfusion ratios, and mobilization of bronchial secretions
4. Oscillatory PEP devices—combination of preventing air trapping on expiration and mobilizing sputum
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
It is recommended to immunize the population: seasonal vaccination against influenza virus (in October-November), SARS-CoV-2 infection, and pneumococcus. Specific vaccine prophylaxis for other acute respiratory viral infections has not been developed [1-4,7,9,11].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
5.2. Non-specific prevention[1]
It is recommended to provide early diagnosis and active case-finding of infected individuals, including those with asymptomatic forms; [1-4,7].
The patient is isolated at home or, if necessary, in a hospital setting until complete clinical recovery. Focal containment measures are not carried out. It is necessary to provide the patient with separate tableware and personal care items [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Quarantine and isolation measures for contacts are not organized [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
It is recommended to follow the mask mandate, replacing masks every 3–4 hours of work when dealing with patients with CAP [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
It is recommended to organize sanitary and anti-epidemic (preventive) measures providing for mandatory disinfection of tableware, air, and room surfaces using effective disinfectants and methods approved for viral infections, as well as routine wet cleaning and airing of premises [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
It is recommended to administer chemoprophylaxis to individuals with a history of contact with a CAP patient for immediate antiviral action and to increase the body's resistance [1-4,7,9-11].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Prescription regimens and doses are detailed in the prevention section of the clinical guidelines: "ARVI in adults", "Influenza in adults", and the interim guidelines "Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19)" version 18
Non-specific prophylaxis is divided into two options: emergency prophylaxis, designed for the immediate antiviral effect of chemical agents, interferons, and interferon inducers (focal and non-focal (scheduled)), and seasonal prophylaxis performed in the pre-epidemic period to increase the human body's resistance to respiratory viruses during the period of maximum disease probability. Focal prophylaxis is carried out among individuals who have been in direct contact with patients in families, apartments, hospital rooms (epidemic foci). The duration of focal prophylaxis ranges from 2 days upon cessation of contact with the source of infection up to 5-7 days if contact persists. Non-focal prophylaxis is carried out among populations at high risk of ARVI infection and at high risk of adverse disease outcomes
5.3 Clinical follow-up (dispensary observation)
It is recommended to undergo dispensary follow-up with a general practitioner (therapist) if complications develop [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
After discharge, for 1 month, it is recommended to refrain from routine vaccinations, except (if indicated) tetanus toxoid** and rabies vaccine** [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
[1] SanPiN 3.3686-21 "Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for the prevention of infectious diseases. XXXIV. Prevention of influenza and other acute respiratory viral infections" (Decree of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation No. 2 dated January 28, 2021).
6. Organization of Medical Care
The choice of treatment tactics is influenced by the following factors [1-4,7]: patient age; nature of comorbidities; clinical form of the disease; disease course pattern (dynamics of symptom progression); disease severity; presence and nature of complications.
It is recommended to establish the case definition of CAP in a patient before deciding on CAP management tactics: severity grade, extent of lung involvement, uncomplicated or complicated course [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
It is recommended to treat patients with mild CAP in an outpatient setting; however, if ongoing treatment is unsuccessful or cannot be provided in an outpatient setting, hospitalization in an inpatient facility is considered [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Hospitalization to a medical facility is recommended for patients with severe, moderate, and complicated viral pneumonia, patients in risk groups, as well as for epidemic indications, including those with mild disease (living in dormitories and unfavorable residential environments)[1] [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comment: risk groups for an unfavorable disease course are described in section 7
Hospitalization in a hospital is recommended in the presence of the following criteria: tachypnea of more than 24 breaths per minute; hypoxemia (SpO2 <95%), impaired consciousness, decrease in blood pressure by one-third compared to the baseline value, for the timely provision of care [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Transfer to the intensive care unit is recommended for the timely provision of emergency care to viral pneumonia patients presenting with any of the following criteria: [1-4,7].
1. SpO2 <90%
2. Progressive and pronounced dyspnea, RR >30 per minute
3. Cyanosis
4. SBP <90 mm Hg
5. CNS dysfunction (GCS score <15 points)
6. Shock (mottled extremities, acrocyanosis, cold extremities, delayed capillary refill time (>3 s), lactate >3 mmol/L
7. Hepatic dysfunction (increase in plasma bilirubin concentration >20 µmol/L for 2 days or a 2-fold or greater increase in transaminases from the normal range)
8. Acute kidney injury (hourly urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for 1 hour or a 2-fold increase in creatinine from the normal range)
9. Coagulopathy (platelet count <100 × 10^3/µL or a 50% decrease from the peak value within 3 days)
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comment: certain scales will also help the anesthesiologist-resuscitator evaluate the indications for ICU admission: CURB-65, PORT, ATO/AOIB, SMART-COP.
It is recommended to urgently revise the management plan for a viral pneumonia patient upon the appearance of signs (symptoms) of progressive disease progression[2]: [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments:
1) with symptoms indicating impaired oxygen supply to the body or cardiopulmonary failure (dyspnea [upon exertion or at rest], labored breathing, cyanosis, bloody or stained sputum, chest pain, hypotension; hypoxia detected by pulse oximetry);
2) with symptoms indicating CNS complications (altered mental status, unconsciousness, drowsiness or difficulty waking up, and intermittent or constant convulsions [seizures], confusion, severe weakness or paralysis);
3) upon confirmation of a secondary bacterial infection based on laboratory results or clinical signs (e.g., persistence of a persistently high body temperature and other symptoms for more than 3 days);
4) upon the onset of severe dehydration manifested by decreased activity, dizziness, reduced diuresis, and lethargy.
Discharge of the patient from the medical facility is recommended upon persistent improvement of the clinical picture: normalization of body temperature, relief of respiratory-catarrhal syndrome, respiratory disorders, and organ dysfunction, along with normal complete blood count, CRP, PCT, and fibrinogen levels [1-4,7].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Conditions for the provision of medical services
Medical care is provided in the following forms:
emergency medical care;
urgent medical care;
Medical care is provided in the form of:
primary health care;
emergency medical care, including specialized emergency medical care;
specialized medical care, including high-tech medical care.
Medical care for adult patients with ARVI can be provided under the following conditions:
outpatient (in settings not providing round-the-clock medical observation and treatment);
inpatient (in settings providing round-the-clock medical observation and treatment).
Primary health care is provided to patients on an outpatient basis and in a day hospital setting.
Primary paramedic-led health-care in outpatient settings is provided at feldsher-midwifery stations.
Primary physician-delivered health care is provided by a district general practitioner or general practitioner (family doctor) on an outpatient basis.
Primary specialized primary health care is provided by an infectious disease specialist of a medical organization providing medical care to outpatients.
Specialized, including high-tech, medical care is provided in an inpatient setting by infectious disease specialists and other medical specialists and includes the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions requiring the use of special methods and complex medical technologies, as well as medical rehabilitation.
Patient treatment is carried out in a hospital setting upon referral by a district general practitioner, general practitioner (family doctor), infectious disease specialist, or medical personnel who detected ARVI.
[1] SanPiN 3.3686-21 "Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for the prevention of infectious diseases. XXXIV. Prevention of influenza and other acute respiratory viral infections" (Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation No. 2 dated January 28, 2021).
[2] Letter of the Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare of the Russian Federation No. 01/17863-9-32 dated November 26, 2009, "On forwarding the WHO document 'Clinical management of human infection with pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 virus'".
7. Additional Information
The severity of viral pneumonia and the mortality rate are higher in patients older than 65 years and individuals in risk groups:
women of childbearing age (due to pregnancy and breastfeeding, leading to iron and micronutrient deficiency or decreased physical activity and obesity);
people with severe chronic diseases (bronchopulmonary, cardiovascular, endocrine), morbid obesity (BMI ≥40 kg/m2), alcoholism;
people with immunodeficiencies or receiving immunosuppressive therapy;
individuals in contact with a large number of people;
patients from closed collectives (boarding schools, social care facilities)—among members of organized adult communities with shared living quarters.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria | Performance evaluation |
|---|---|---|
1. Diagnosis stage | ||
1 | General examination, thermometry, assessment of RR, BP, and HR were performed. | Yes/No |
2 | Physical examination of the lungs performed (palpation, percussion, auscultation) | Yes/No |
3 | Pulse oximetry with SpO2 measurement performed | Yes/No |
4 | Physical examination of the heart was performed: pulse and blood pressure measurement, auscultation (detection of tachycardia, heart murmurs, etc.). | Yes/No |
5 | A complete blood count (differential) was performed | Yes/No |
6 | A general (clinical) urinalysis was performed | Yes/No |
7 | Biochemical (general therapeutic) blood test was performed. | Yes/No |
8 | Rapid immunochromatographic testing for influenza A and B viruses (detection of influenza virus antigens) and SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus was performed. | Yes/No |
9 | Molecular biological study of nasopharyngeal andoropharyngeal swabs or rapid immunochromatographic testing of a nasopharyngeal swab for influenza A and B viruses was performed. | Yes/No |
10 | Molecular biological study of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs or rapid immunochromatographic testing of a nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus was performed for differential diagnosis. | Yes/No |
11 | Coagulation panel was performed in patients with severe and complicated viral pneumonia or with manifestations of hemorrhagic syndrome. | Yes/No |
12 | Study of inflammatory markers (fibrinogen, procalcitonin, troponin, ferritin) was performed in patients with severe and complicated viral pneumonia. | Yes/No |
13 | Acid-base balance and blood gas analysis with determination of PaO2, PaCO2, pH, bicarbonates, and lactate were performed in patients with severe and complicated viral pneumonia. | Yes/No |
14 | Chest X-ray in 2 projections (anteroposterior and right lateral) or computed tomography of the chest organs was performed. | Yes/No |
15 | Electrocardiography was performed in patients with moderate and severe viral pneumonia (especially elderly and senile patients). | Yes/No |
Consultation by an anesthesiologist-resuscitator was performed for patients with rapidly progressive acute respiratory failure or other organ failure, and transfer to the ICU was carried out when indicated. | Yes/No | |
16 | Pathogenetic and symptomatic therapy was administered. | Yes/No |
17 | Etiotropic therapy with antiviral drugs was administered. | Yes/No |
18 | Broad-spectrum antibacterial therapy was administered in the presence of a confirmed bacterial infection. | Yes/No |
19 | Discharge of the patient from the medical facility was performed upon: persistent improvement of the clinical picture: normalization of body temperature, relief of respiratory-catarrhal syndrome, respiratory disorders, and organ dysfunction, along with normal complete blood count, CRP, procalcitonin, and fibrinogen levels. | Yes/No |
References
Show references
Korin Yu.Yu., Kukol L.V. Viral pneumonias: features of diagnosis, clinical course, and treatment. Medical Alliance. 2020;8(4):32-39.
Gulyabin K.R. Basic principles of diagnosis and treatment of viral pneumonia. General Practitioner Handbook. 2021;(2):40-47.
Infectious Diseases. National Guidelines. Ed. by Acad. of RAMS N.D. Yushchuk, Acad. of RANS Yu.Ya. Vengerov. 2nd ed., revised and expanded. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publishing Group; 2019. 1004 p.
Lyadov K.V., Koneva E.S., Polushkin V.G., Sultanov E.Yu., Lukashin M.A. Randomized controlled study on pulmonary rehabilitation in COVID-19 patients with pneumonia. Pulmonologiya. 2020;30(S5):569-576.
Kharitonov M.A., Salukhov V.V., Kryukov E.V., Patsenko M.B., Rudakov Yu.V., Bogomolov A.B., Ivanov V.V., Minakov A.A. Viral pneumonia: a new look at an old problem (literature review). Meditsinsky Sovet. 2021;(16):60–77. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2021-16-60-77
Zairatyants O.V., Samsonova M.V., Mikhaleva L.M., Chernyaev A.L., Mishnev O.D., Krupnov N.M., Kalinin D.V. Pathological anatomy of COVID-19: Atlas. General ed. by O.V. Zairatyants. Moscow: NIIOZMM DZM; 2020. 142 p.
Zairatyants O.V., Malyavin A.G., Samsonova M.V., Chernyaev A.L., Mishnev O.D., Mikhaleva L.M., Krupnov N.M., Kalinin D.V. Pathomorphological changes in the lungs in COVID-19: clinical and therapeutic parallels. Terapiya. 2020;(5):35-46.
Esaulenko E.V., Alexandrovich Yu.S., Bushmanova A.D., Pshenisnov K.V., Novak K.E., Basina V.V., Pozdnyakova M.G., Ditkovskaya L.V., Akimenko T.I. Viral pneumonias. Textbook for physicians. Saint Petersburg: SPbGPMU Publishing House; 2022. 100 p.
On the State of Sanitary and Epidemiological Welfare of the Population in the Russian Federation in 2023: State Report. Moscow: Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing, 2024. – 364 p.
Babak S.L., Gorelov A.V., Zaitsev A.A. et al. Influenza in adults. Moscow: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; 2022. 104 p. EDN PGBFSV.
Chulanov V.P., Gorelov A.V., Malyavin A.G. et al. Acute respiratory viral infections (ARVI) in adults. Moscow: National Scientific Society of Infectionists; 2021. 70 p. EDN NEZDFV.
Interim Guidelines "Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19)". Version 18 (26.10.2023). Russian Ministry of Health, 2023. Available at: https://static0.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/064/610/original/%D0%92%D0%9C%D0%A0_COVID-19_V18.pdf
"Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults". Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health. M., 2021
Ebell MH, Bentivegna M, Cai X, et al. Accuracy of Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Adult
Community‐acquired Pneumonia: A Meta‐analysis. Academic Emergency Medicine 2020; 27 (3):195-206.
Liu D, Su L_X, Guan W, et al. Prognostic value of procalcitonin in pneumonia: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Respirology 2016; 21(2): 280-288.
Hökenek NM, Seyhan AU, Erdogan MO, et al. Evaluation of Blood Gas Analysis as a Mortality Predictor. South Clin Ist Euras 2019; 30 (3): 228-231
Dellinger R.P., Levy M.M., Rhodes A., et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med 2013;41:580-637
Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in healthcare organizations of St. Petersburg. Bubnova N.A., Zueva L.P., Kolbin A.S., Kolosovskaya E.N., Luft V.M., Naser N.R. et al. 2016; 94 p.
Howell M.D., Donnino M., Clardy P., et al. Occult hypoperfusion and mortality in patients with suspected infection. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:1892-1899.
Zhou H., Lan T., Guo S. Prognostic Prediction Value of qSOFA, SOFA, and Admission Lactate in Septic Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Emergency Department. Emerg Med Int 2020; 2020: 7979353.
Voytenkov V.B. Instrumental diagnostic methods for cardiac pathology in infectious diseases / V.B. Voytenkov, S.N. Chuprova, I.V. Babachenko et al. // Journal of Infectology, 2018. - No. 1 (vol. 10). – P. 15–23
Isakov V.A., Arkhipov G.S., Kovalenko A.L., Turkin V.V. Therapy of viral infections. Lechashchiy Vrach, 2000; 3: 57−59.
Mazina N.K., Sheshunov I.V., Mazin P.V. Adjuvant energy protection with reamberin in intensive care and resuscitation practice: efficacy according to meta-analysis data (systematic review). Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya. 2016; 61(4): 314−319.
Dvoretsky L.I. The febrile patient. Place and utility of antipyretics // Russian Medical Journal. – 2011. – Vol. 19. – No. 18. – P. 1166-1171.
Martynov A.I., Malyavin A.G., Zhuravleva M.V. et al. Expert Council Consensus of the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine (RSMSIM) "Improving treatment outcomes for respiratory tract infections". Profilakticheskaya Meditsina, 2019, 22 (4): 144-151
Mehlisch D.R., Aspley S., Daniels S.E. et al. A single-tablet fixed-dose combination of racemic ibuprofen/paracetamol in the management of moderate to severe postoperative dental pain in adult and adolescent patients: a multicenter, two-stage, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, factorial study // Clin Ther. 2010. Vol. 32. P. 1033–1049
Hay, Alastair D., et al. "Paracetamol plus ibuprofen for the treatment of fever in children (PITCH): randomised controlled trial." Bmj 337 (2008).
A.G. Malyavin, A.V. Gorelov, E.V. Esaulenko, O.V. Kalyuzhin, E.V. Shikh, S.L. Babak, M.V. Pchelintsev. Round table expert consensus "ARVI therapy in adults: traditional views and perspectives" // Terapiya. - No. 10. - 2022
Eccles, R., Turner, R. B. & Dicpinigaitis, P. V. Treatment of Acute Cough Due to the Common Cold: Multi-component, Multi-symptom Therapy is Preferable to Single-Component, Single-Symptom Therapy—A Pro/Con Debate. Lung 194, 15–20 (2016).
Picon PD, Costa MB, da Veiga Picon R, et al. Symptomatic treatment of the common cold with a fixed-dose combination of paracetamol, chlorphenamine and phenylephrine: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:556
Kiran, Mayuresh D., Monali P. Vakharia, Lalit J. Pawaskar, and Shaheen N. Sheikh. 2018. “Efficacy and Safety of a Fixed Dose Combination of Paracetamol, Chlorpheniramine Maleate and Phenylephrine in Treatment of Common Cold: A Phase IV, Open-Labelled, Multi-Centric Study.” International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology 8 (1): 34.
Okovity S.V., Sukhanov D.S., Zaytsev A.A. Cough in novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19): rational approaches to pharmacotherapy (review) // Pulmonologiya. - 2022. - Vol. 32. No. 2. - P. 232-238.
Zaitsev A.A., Leshchenko I.V., Esaulova N.A., Viktorova I.A. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a combination drug containing ambroxol, guaifenesin, and levosalbutamol compared with the fixed combination bromhexine/guaifenesin/salbutamol in the treatment of productive cough in adult patients with acute bronchitis. Therapeutic Archive. 2023;95(3):235–241.
Zaccone E.J., Lieu T., Muroi Y. et al. Parainfluenza 3-induced cough hypersensitivity in the guinea pig airways. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5): e0155526. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155526
Deng Z., Zhou W., Sun J. et al IFN-γ enhances the cough reflex sensitivity via calcium influx in vagal sensory neurons. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 198(7): 868-879. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201709-1813OC
Patil M.J., Ru F., Sun H. et al Acute activation of bronchopulmonary vagal nociceptors by type I interferons. J Physiol. 2020; 598(23): 5541-5554. DOI: 10.1113/JP280276
Zaytsev A.A., Okovity S.V., Miroshnichenko N.A., Kryukov E.V. Cough: Methodological recommendations for physicians // M.: Main Military Clinical Hospital named after Academician N.N. Burdenko. - 2021.
Zaytsev A.A. Cough: problems and solutions // Practical Pulmonology. – 2020. - No. 2. - P. 78-86.
Budnevsky A.V., Ovsyannikov E.S., Feygelman S.N. Study of levodropropizine efficacy in the treatment of non-productive cough // Practical Pulmonology. - 2021. - No. 2. – P. 65-74.
Khamitov R.F., Ilkovich M.M., Akopov A.L., Mikhaylusova M.P., Petrov D.V., Alpenidze D.N., Shapovalova Yu.S., Kozyrev O.A., Abramenkova N.Yu., Shunkov V.B., Pavlysh E.F., Erofeeva S.B. Results of a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study on the efficacy and safety of Rengalin for the treatment of cough in adult patients with acute respiratory infection. Terapiya. 2019; 5(1(27)): 38-53.
Akopov A.L., Alexandrova E.B., Ilkovich M.M., Petrov D.V., Trofimov V.I. Rengalin: a new effective and safe drug in cough treatment. Results of a multicenter comparative randomized clinical trial in patients with acute respiratory infections. Antibiotiki i Khimioterapiya. 2015; 60(3-4): 19-26.
Geppe N.A., Kondyurina E.G., Galustyan A.N., Pak T.E., Baltserovich N.B., Zhiglinskaya O.V., Kamaev A.V., Lazareva S.G., Laleko S.L., Melnikova I.M., Mikhaylova E.V., Perminova O.A., Sabitov A.U., Spivakovskiy Yu.M., Shamsheva O.V., Chernaya N.L. New possibilities for effective cough therapy in acute respiratory infections in children. Lechaschiy Vrach. 2017; (10): 25-33.
Roveta A.M., Debbia E.A., Schito G.C., Marchese A. Comparison of the activity of N-acetylcysteine, Ambroxol, Bromexine and Sobrelol on Staphylococcus aureus biofilms//GIMMOC.2004. Vol.8, p.1-12.
Blasi F. et al. The effect of N-acetylcysteine on biofilms: Implications for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Respiratory Medicine. 2016;117:190-197.
Malyavin A.G. Myths of acute bronchitis. Non nocere. 2019; 9:19-24.
Malyavin A.G. Acute bronchitis and the role of viral infection in this disease. Non nocere. 2020; 11: 84–93.
Zaitsev A.A., Okovity S.V., Kryukov E.V. [Modern capabilities of mucoactive therapy]. Farmateka. 2015;14:81-4. (In Russian).
Lidzhieva A.A., Smolyarchuk E.A. [Levosalbutamol: new treatment options for bronchial asthma]. Vedomosti Nauchnogo tsentra ekspertizy sredstv meditsinskogo primeneniya. 2015;2:25-8. (In Russian).
Jan Lotvall, Mona Palmqvist, Peter Arvidsson, Alan Maloney, Pietro Ventresca, Jonathan Ward. The therapeutic ratio of R-albuterol is comparable with that of RS-albuterol in asthmatic patients. Goteborg, Sweden, and Greenford, United Kingdom. July 27, 2001; S-413 45.
Zaitsev A.A., Leshchenko I.V., Esaulova N.A., Viktorova I.A. Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a combination drug containing ambroxol, guaifenesin, and levosalbutamol compared with the fixed combination bromhexine/guaifenesin/salbutamol in the treatment of productive cough in adult patients with acute bronchitis. Therapeutic Archive. 2023;95(3):235–241.
Johnson R., Vinetz J. Dexamethasone in the management of COVID-19. BMJ. 2020; 370: m2648. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2648.
Munch M., Myatra S., et al. Effect of 12 mg vs 6 mg of Dexamethasone on the Number of Days Alive Without Life Support in Adults With COVID-19 and Severe Hypoxemia: The COVID STEROID 2 Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2021; 326 (18): 1807-1817. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.18295.
Papamanoli A., Yoo J., Grewal P., et al. High-dose methylprednisolone in nonintubated patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021; 51(2):e13458. doi: 10.1111/eci.13458.
Zaytsev A.A., Golukhova E.Z., Mamalyga M.L., et al. Efficacy of methylprednisolone pulse therapy in patients with COVID-19. CMAC. 2020. Volume 22. No. 2: 88 – 91. doi: 10.36488/cmac.2020.2.88-91
Webb S., Higgins A., McArthur C. Glucocorticoid Dose in COVID-19: Lessons for Clinical Trials During a Pandemic. JAMA 2021; 326 (18): 1801-1802. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.16438
Avdeev S.N. Urgent oxygen therapy. Annals of Critical Care 2011; No. 3: 42-51.
Avdeev S.N. Modern recommendations for emergency oxygen therapy. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv 2012; 84 (No. 12): 108-114.
Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, Hess D, Hill NS et al Official ERS/ATS Clinical Practice Guidelines: Noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2017 Aug 31; 50: 1602426. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02426-2016.
Avdeev S.N. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure: from clinical guidelines to clinical practice. Pulmonologiya 2018; 28(1): 32-35. DOI:10.18093/0869-0189-2018-28-1-32-35
Diagnosis and intensive therapy of acute respiratory distress syndrome: clinical guidelines of the Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists of Russia [Electronic resource]. A.I. Yaroshetskiy, A.I. Gritsan, S.N. Avdeev [et al.] – 2020. – Access mode: http://www.far.org.ru/recomendation.
Ishiguro T, Kobayashi Y, Uozumi R, Takata N, Takaku Y, Kagiyama N, Kanauchi T, Shimizu Y, Takayanagi N. Viral Pneumonia Requiring Differentiation from Acute and Progressive Diffuse Interstitial Lung Diseases. Intern Med. 2019;58(24):3509-3519. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2696-19. Epub 2019 Dec 15. PMID: 31839671; PMCID: PMC6949447.
O. Ruuskanen, E. Lahti, L.C. Jennings, D.R. Murdoch. Viral pneumonia. Lancet, 377 (2011), pp. 1264-1275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61459-6
Diagnosis and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in military personnel: Guidelines / A. A. Zaytsev, M. B. Patsenko, A. M. Makarevich [et al.]. – not republished. – Moscow: Main Military Clinical Hospital named after N.N. Burdenko, 2023. – 28 p. – EDN QBACUY]
Metlay J., Waterer G., Long A., et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Adults with Community-acquired Pneumonia. An Official Clinical Practice Guideline of the American Thoracic Society and Infectious Diseases Society of America // Am J Respir Crit Care Med. - 2019. - P. 200. - P. e45-e67.
Avdeev S.N., Zaytsev A.A., Zhdanov K.V., et al. Management algorithms for patients with severe forms of influenza A/H1N1: from diagnostics to respiratory support methods. Methodological recommendations // Consilium Medicum. - 2022. - Vol. 24. - No. 12. - P. 843-850,
Zaytsev A.A., Shchegolev A.V. Diagnosis and treatment of severe lung lesions in influenza A(H1N1/09): practical recommendations // Military Medical Journal. - 2016. - Vol. 337. - No. 3. - P. 39-46.
Johansson N., Kalin M., Backman-Johansson C., et al. Procalcitonin levels in community-acquired pneumonia - correlation with aetiology and severity // Scand. J. Infect. Dis. - 2014. - 46 (11). - P.787-791
Zaytsev A.A., Sinopalnikov A.I. "Difficult" pneumonia. // Moscow. - 2020. - 104 p.
Avdeev S.N., Dekhnich A.V., Zaytsev A.A., et al. Community-acquired pneumonia: federal clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment // Pulmonologiya. 2022. - Vol. 32. - No. 3. - P. 295-355, Clinical guidelines "Community-acquired pneumonia in adults", Russian Ministry of Health, 2021.
Shiley, KT ∙ van Deerlin, VM ∙ Miller, Jr, WT Chest CT features of community-acquired respiratory viral infections in adult inpatients with lower respiratory tract infections J Thorac Imaging. 2010; 25:68-75;
Claessens Y., Debray M., Tubach F. et al. Early chest computed tomography scan to assist diagnosis and guide treatment decision for suspected community-acquired pneumonia // Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. - 2015. - 192 (8). - P. 974-982;
Ishiguro T, Kobayashi Y, Uozumi R, Takata N, Takaku Y, Kagiyama N, Kanauchi T, Shimizu Y, Takayanagi N. Viral Pneumonia Requiring Differentiation from Acute and Progressive Diffuse Interstitial Lung Diseases. Intern Med. 2019;58(24):3509-3519. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2696-19. Epub 2019 Dec 15. PMID: 31839671; PMCID: PMC6949447.
Federal guide to the use of drugs (formulary system). Issue XVII. Ed. by Chuchalin A.G., Yasnetsov V.V. M.: Vidoks. 2016; 1045 p.
Rozenberg O. A. et al. Surfactant therapy in the complex treatment of severe bilateral pneumonia and ARDS caused by influenza A/H1N1 virus // M.V. Shvechkova et al. // Delo Zhizni. – 2016. – No. 2. – P. 10.
Rozenberg O.A. Pulmonary surfactant preparations and surfactant therapy for ARDS in surgical intensive care settings (literature review). Creative Surgery and Oncology. 2019; 9(1): 50-65. https://doi.org/10.24060/2076-3093-2019-9-1-50-65
Bodrova R.A., Kiryanova V.R., Tsykunov M.B., Delyan A.M., Sadykov I.F., Savina A.I., Khusainova E.R. Potential of physical rehabilitation in pneumonia. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020; 97 (3): 31-39. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2020-97-3-31-39
Gusakova E.V., Tkachenko G.A. Comprehensive rehabilitation of patients after COVID-19. Kremlin Medicine. Clinical Journal. 2021; 2: 57-60.
Ivanova G.E., Balandina I.N., Bakhtina I.S., Belkin A.A., Belyaev A.F., Bodrova R.A., Buylova T.V., Grechko A.V., Didur M.D., Kalinina S.A., Kiryanova V.V., Laisheva O.A., Maltseva M.N., Melnikova E.V., Mishina I.E., Petrova M.V., Pryanikov I.V., Postnikova L.B., Suvorov A.Yu., Solovyova L.N., Tsykunov M.B., Shmonin A.A. Medical rehabilitation for novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19). Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Medical Rehabilitation. 2020; 2(2): 140–189.
Kirilyuk E.V., Nestruev M.M., Kabaeva E.N. Exercise therapy in the treatment and rehabilitation of patients with viral pneumonia caused by COVID-19 / Diagnosis and treatment of novel coronavirus infection. Organization of work in a multi-profile hospital. A guide for physicians. Edited by V.I. Vechorko. - Moscow, 2020.
Lyadov K.V., Koneva E.S., Polushkin V.G., Sultanov E.Yu., Lukashin M.A. Respiratory rehabilitation in patients with viral pneumonia complicated by novel coronavirus infection. Pulmonologiya. 2020; 30 (5): 569–576.
Malyavin A.G., Epifanov V.A., Glazkova I.I. Rehabilitation for respiratory diseases. – M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2010. 352 p. Version 2 (31.07.2020)
Medical rehabilitation for novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19). Interim clinical guidelines.
Meshcheryakova N.N., Belevsky A.S., Kuleshov A.V. Pulmonary rehabilitation of patients recovering from COVID-19 coronavirus infection (clinical cases). Pulmonologiya. 2020; 30 (5): 715–722.
Starikov S.M., Yudin V.E., Kalashnikov S.V., Mokhov P.A., Tkachenko S.A., Kosukhin E.S. Physical rehabilitation of patients with pneumonia associated with coronavirus infection (COVID-19): study guide / S.M. Starikov, V.E. Yudin, S.V. Kalashnikov, P.A. Mokhov, S.A. Tkachenko, E.S. Kosukhin. – M. : MGUPP, 2020. – M. : Pero Publishing House
Aleksandrov V.I. Reflexology for nervous system diseases in children: study guide / V.I. Aleksandrov; State Budgetary Educational Institution of Additional Professional Education RMAPE "Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education". – M.: SBEI DPE RMAPE, 2014. – 74 p. ISBN 978-5-7249-2283-8
E. D. Tykochinskaya. Basics of acupuncture. M.: Meditsina, 1979. — 344 p.
Starikov S.M., Yudin V.E., Kalashnikov S.V., Mokhov P.A., Tkachenko S.A., Kosukhin E.S. Physical rehabilitation of patients with pneumonia associated with coronavirus infection (COVID-19): study guide / S.M. Starikov, V.E. Yudin, S.V. Kalashnikov, P.A. Mokhov, S.A. Tkachenko, E.S. Kosukhin. – M. : MGUPP, 2020. – M. : Pero Publishing House, 2020. – 75 p.
Avdeev S.N., Malyavin A.G., eds. Methodological recommendations "Diagnosis, prevention, treatment and rehabilitation of viral lung damage in SARS-CoV-2 infection" Terapiya, 2023, No. 5, 211 p.
Use of oxyethylammonium methylphenoxyacetate for the treatment of acute respiratory viral infections at the outpatient stage / E. V. Esaulenko, K. E. Novak, A. D. Ibrokhimova [et al.] // RMJ. Medical Review. – 2023. – Vol. 7, No. 11. – P. 718-724. – DOI 10.32364/2587-6821-2023-7-11-3. – EDN PWMNKP
Erofeeva M.K., Maksakova V.L. Trekrezan is an immunomodulatory drug with pronounced adaptogenic properties. Federal State Budgetary Institution "Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza" of the Russian Ministry of Health, St. Petersburg, Russia. Poliklinika Journal 2020, 4, pp. 71-74
Storozhenko P.A., Zhigachyova I.V., Kuznetsov I.A., Begmetova M.Kh., Myakinkova L.L., Gukasov V.M., Rybakov Yu.L., Rasulov M.M. Property of the drug Trekrezan to modulate protein synthesis in cells. Medicine and High Technologies. 2022. No. 1. P. 36-43.
Malyavin A.G., Gorelov A.V., Vasenina E.E., Ekusheva E.V., Kobzeva N.D., Kovalchuk V.V., Esaulenko E.V. Post-infectious asthenia: modern approaches to therapy. Resolution of the Expert Council of the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Therapists and the National Association of Infectious Diseases Specialists named after Academician V.I. Pokrovsky. Profilakticheskaya Meditsina. 2023;26(9):82–91. https://doi.org/10.17116/profmed2023260918. (In Russ.)
Methodological recommendations "Features of the course of Long-COVID infection. Therapeutic and rehabilitation measures". Terapiya. 2022; 1 (Supplement): 1–147)
Moore SE, Hebert BJ, Wilde AM. Practical Insight into Understanding the Clinical Conundrum of Viral Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Review. Norton Healthcare Medical Journal. 2024;1(1). doi:10.59541/001c.118568].
Jain S, Self WH, Wunderink RG, CDC EPIC Study Team, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization among U.S. adults. N Engl J Med 373: 415-427, 2015].
Freeman AM, Leigh Jr TR. Viral Pneumonia. [Updated 2023 Jul 4]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513286/
Burk M, El-Kersh K, Saad M, Wiemken T, Ramirez J, Cavallazzi R. Viral infection in community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev. 2016 Jun;25(140):178-88. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0076-2015. PMID: 27246595; PMCID: PMC9487248.
Zaitsev A.A., Makarevich A.M. Acute respiratory viral infections: directions of diagnosis and rational therapy (how to avoid mistakes?). Consilium Medicum. 2024;26(3):159–163. DOI: 10.26442/20751753.2024.3.202739.
Bautin A.E. Use of surfactant preparation in the complex therapy of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Methodological recommendations. 2021: 42 p.
Kirillov Yu.A., Chernov I.A., Malysheva E.M., Timofeev S.E., Kukushkin V.I., Zharkov N.V., Rozenberg O.A. Oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in the development of experimental radiation-induced lung injury and their correction with a pulmonary surfactant preparation. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology 2020; 9 (1): 35–42.
Avdeev SN, Trushenko NV, Chikina SY, Tsareva NA, Merzhoeva ZM, Yaroshetskiy AI, Sopova VI, Sopova MI, Rosenberg OA, Schermuly RT, Kosanovic D. Beneficial effects of inhaled surfactant in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Respir Med 2021; 185: 106489. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2021.106489
Avdeev S.N. Modern recommendations for emergency oxygen therapy. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv 2012; 84 (No. 12): 108-114.
Rochwerg B, Brochard L, Elliott MW, Hess D, Hill NS et al Official ERS/ATS Clinical Practice Guidelines: Noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2017 Aug 31; 50: 1602426. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02426-2016.
Avdeev S.N. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure: from clinical guidelines to clinical practice. Pulmonologiya 2018; 28(1): 32-35. DOI:10.18093/0869-0189-2018-28-1-32-35
Avdeev S, Yaroshetskiy A, Tsareva N, Merzhoeva Z, Trushenko N, Nekludova G, Chikina S. Noninvasive ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in patients with COVID-19. Amer J Emerg Med 2021; 39: 154–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2020.09.075.
Vaschetto R, Barone-Adesi F, Racca F, Pissaia C, et al. Outcomes of COVID-19 patients treated with continuous positive airway pressure outside ICU. ERJ Open Res 2021; 7(1): 00541-2020. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00541-2020.
Bellani G, Grasselli G, Cecconi M, Antolini L, Borelli M, et al. Noninvasive Ventilatory Support of COVID-19 Patients Outside the Intensive Care Units. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2021; 18: 1020-1026. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202008-1080OC.
Grieco DL, Menga LS, Cesarano M, Rosa` T, Spadaro S, Bitondo MM, et al. Effect of helmet noninvasive ventilation vs high-flow nasal oxygen on days free of respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 and moderate to severe hypoxemic respiratory failure: the HENIVOT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2021;325(17):1731–43. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.4682
Avdeev S.N., Tsareva N.A., Merzhoeva Z.M., Trushenko N.V., Yaroshetskiy A.I. Practical guidelines for oxygen therapy and respiratory support in patients with COVID-19 at the pre-intensive care stage. Pulmonology 2020; 30(2): 151–163. DOI: 10.18093/0869-0189-2020-30-2-151-163
WHO Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) when COVID-19 disease is suspected: interim guidance. 2020. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/33 0854/WHO-nCoV-Clinical-2020.2-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yWHO/nCoV/Clinical/2020.2.
Savarimuthu S, BinSaeid J, Harky A. The role of ECMO in COVID-19: can it provide rescue therapy in those who are critically ill? J Card Surg. 2020; 35(6):1298–301.
Schmidt M, Hajage D, Lebreton G, et al; Groupe de Recherche Clinique en REanimation et Soins intensifs du Patient en Insuffisance Respiratoire aiguE (GRC-RESPIRE) Sorbonne Université; Paris-Sorbonne ECMO-COVID investigators: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with COVID-19: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med 8: 1121–1131, 2020.
Lorusso R, Combes A, Lo Coco V, De Piero ME, Belohlavek J; EuroECMO COVID-19 WorkingGroup; Euro-ELSO Steering Committee: ECMO for COVID-19 patients in Europe and Israel [published online ahead of print January 9, 2021]. Intensive Care Med 2021; doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06272-3.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Avdeev S.N. − MD, Professor, Full Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the National Medical Research Center for Pulmonology; Head of the Department of Pulmonology, N.V. Sklifosovsky Institute of Clinical Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University;
Aleksandrovich Yu.S. − Chief freelance pediatric specialist anesthesiologist-resuscitator of the Northwestern Federal District of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Pediatrics at the Faculty of Postgraduate and Additional Professional Education, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor, MD, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation.
Babak S.L. − MD, Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of Phthisiology and Pulmonology, N.A. Semashko Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Russian University of Medicine of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Gorelov A.V. − Full Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director for Research, Central Research Institute of Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, Head of the Department of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Zaitsev A.A. – MD, Professor, Chief Pulmonologist at the Main Military Clinical Hospital named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Makarevich A.M. – PhD in Medicine, Associate Professor at the Department of Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Krai State Budgetary Educational Institution of Additional Professional Education "Institute for Advanced Training of Healthcare Specialists" of the Ministry of Health of Khabarovsk Krai.
Malyavin A.G. − MD, Professor, Professor at the Department of Phthisiology and Pulmonology, Faculty of General Medicine, A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the Respiratory Medicine Center.
Novak K.E. − PhD in Medicine, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Infectious Diseases in Adults and Epidemiology, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health
Povtoreyko A.V. − PhD in Medicine, Chief Physician of the Pskov Regional Infectious Diseases Hospital.
Pozdnyakova M.G. − PhD in Medicine, Senior Researcher at the Laboratory for Testing New Protective Agents Against Viral Infections, Smorodintsev Research Institute of Influenza of the Russian Ministry of Health
Usenko D.V. − MD, Head of the Educational Center, Leading Researcher at the Clinical Department of Infectious Pathology, Central Research Institute of Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor
Chulanov V.P. − MD, Professor, Deputy Director for Research and Innovative Development, National Medical Research Center of Phthisiopulmonology and Infectious Diseases of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Esaulenko E.V. − MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Infectious Diseases in Adults and Epidemiology, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health
All working group members are members of the National Association of Experts in Infectious Diseases named after Academician V.I. Pokrovovsky (NAEID) or the Russian Scientific Medical Society of Internal Medicine (RSMSIM)
There is no conflict of interest.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience of the clinical guidelines:
1. Infectious disease physician;
2. Pulmonologist;
3. General practitioner / Internist;
4. General practitioner;
5. Medical students, clinical residents, postgraduates.
In these clinical guidelines, all data are ranked by level of reliability (evidence) depending on the quantity and quality of studies on the issue.
Determination of levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for diagnostic interventions
Table A1 – Levels of evidence certainty for diagnostic interventions
LoE | Hierarchy of clinical research designs in descending order of levels of evidence certainty from 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of reference-standard controlled studies1 |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard that is not independent of the evaluated method |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
1 The generally accepted standard for diagnostic intervention clinical trials is a cross-sectional study design, in which the investigational diagnostic method and the reference method—serving as the "gold standard" for diagnosing the studied disease or condition—are applied to each included patient in parallel and under identical conditions. The investigational and reference methods must be applied independently of each other (i.e., the investigational method cannot be part of the reference method) and must be interpreted by the investigator without knowledge of the results obtained from the other method (blinding is recommended)
Table А2 – Scale for determining the level of reliability of evidence (LRE) for diagnostic interventions
GoR | Hierarchy of clinical research designs in descending order of levels of evidence certainty from 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
A | Unambiguous (strong) recommendation (all studies are of high or moderate methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
C | Ambiguous (conditional) recommendation (not all studies are of high or moderate methodological quality and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Low (weak) recommendation – lack of adequate quality evidence (all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Table P3 – Possible combinations of LCE and LCR for diagnostic interventions
LoE | Criteria for determining GGR | Final GoR |
|---|---|---|
1=Highest quality evidence: systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control | Both of the following conditions are met: 1. All studies are of high or satisfactory methodological quality; 2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are consistent* | A |
Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions: 1. Not all studies are of high or fair methodological quality; 2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are not consistent* | C | |
Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions: 1. All studies are of low methodological quality; 2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are not consistent* | C | |
2 = Individual studies with control by a reference method | Both of the following conditions are met: 1. All studies are of high or satisfactory methodological quality; 2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are consistent* | A |
Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions: 1. Not all studies are of high or fair methodological quality; 2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are not consistent* | C | |
Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions: 1. All studies are of low methodological quality; 2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are not consistent* | C | |
3 = Studies without sequential control by a reference method or studies with a reference method that is not independent of the evaluated method | Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions: 1. Not all studies are of high or fair methodological quality; 2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are not consistent* | C |
Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions: 1. All studies are of low methodological quality; 2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are not consistent* | C | |
4 = Non-comparative studies, case series/case report | C | |
5 = Least reliable evidence: only a rationale for the mechanism of action or expert opinion is available | C | |
*If a single clinical trial is evaluated, this condition is not taken into account
Determination of the levels of credibility of evidence and grades of recommendation for therapeutic, rehabilitation, and preventive interventions
Table S4 – Levels of evidence (LoE) for therapeutic, rehabilitative, and preventive interventions
LoE | Hierarchy of clinical research designs in descending order of levels of evidence certainty from 1 to 5 |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design except randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | There is only a justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinions |
Table P5 – Scale for determining the grades of recommendation for therapeutic, rehabilitation, and preventive interventions
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Unambiguous (strong) recommendation (all evaluated efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or moderate methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
C | Ambiguous (conditional) recommendation (not all efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or satisfactory methodological quality and/or their results regarding the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Low (weak) recommendation – lack of adequate quality evidence (all evaluated efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines
Clinical guidelines are updated every 3 years.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
These clinical guidelines were developed taking into account the following regulatory legal documents:
Federal Law No. 157-FZ of September 17, 1998, "On Immunoprophylaxis of Infectious Diseases"
Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 326-FZ of November 29, 2010, "On Compulsory Medical Insurance in the Russian Federation".
Federal Law No. 323-FZ of November 21, 2011, "On the Fundamentals of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation".
Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia No. 494 of August 9, 2005, "On the Procedure for the Use of Medicinal Products in Patients for Vital Indications".
Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia No. 804n dated October 13, 2017, "On Approval of the Nomenclature of Medical Services."
Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia No. 69n of January 31, 2012, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Adult Patients with Infectious Diseases".
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 205n dated May 2, 2023, "On Approval of the Nomenclature of Positions of Medical Workers and Pharmaceutical Workers"
Order of the Ministry of Health of Russia No. 700n of October 7, 2015, "On the Nomenclature of Specialties of Specialists with Higher Medical and Pharmaceutical Education".
Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 585n dated August 27, 2019, "On the Classification and Criteria Used in Medical and Social Expertise of Citizens by Federal State Institutions of Medical and Social Expertise."
Order of the Ministry of Health of Russia No. 203n dated May 10, 2017, "On Approval of Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Medical Care."
SanPiN 3.3686-21 "Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for the prevention of infectious diseases." XXXIV. Prevention of influenza and other acute respiratory viral infections (Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation No. 4 dated January 28, 2021).
Letter of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated December 2, 2022, No. 30-4/I/1-20714. Guidelines for medical workers on the differential diagnosis of COVID-19 with influenza and ARVI, and determining management tactics for patients, including children, the elderly, and pregnant women.
Letter of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 30-4/I/2-2702 dated March 6, 2020, "On Sending the Algorithm for Providing Medical Care to the Adult Population with Community-Acquired Pneumonia"
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 330 dated August 5, 2003, "On Measures to Improve Clinical Nutrition in Medical and Preventive Treatment Facilities of the Russian Federation."
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 395n dated June 21, 2013, "On Approval of Medical Nutrition Standards."
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1008n dated September 23, 2020, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Patients with Clinical Nutrition"
Criteria for determining the severity of pneumonia
Mild form | mild symptoms of intoxication, temperature does not exceed 37.5 °C, white blood cells no more than 9×109/L, lesion is within a single segment |
|---|---|
Moderate form | moderate intoxication, temperature up to 38 °C, respiratory rate no more than 22 breaths per minute, heart rate no more than 100 beats per minute, 2–3 segments affected, no complications; |
Severe form | pronounced intoxication, heart rate greater than 100 beats per minute, respiratory rate greater than 25 breaths per minute, blood pressure less than 90/60 mmHg, leukocyte count less than 4×109/L or greater than 20×109/L, multi-lobar bilateral lesion is observed with complications (blood clotting disorders and thrombus formation, septic syndrome, failure of other organs and systems, visual impairment). |
Characteristics of major viruses involved in the development of viral pneumonia | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Virus | Family | Subtype | Incidence of CAP | Children | Adults | Differential diagnosis | Treatment | ||
Children | Adults | Infection | Comorbidity | ||||||
Rhinovirus | Picornaviruses | - | 18% | 6% | All ages, but more common in children | Asthma. Cellular immunosuppression | All year round (more frequently in autumn) | Upper respiratory tract: rhinorrhea, cough, and nasal congestion | Pleconaril (Use of an unregistered drug due to exceptional circumstances) |
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) | Paramyxoviruses | 1 and 2 | 11% | 3% | Neonates and premature infants | COPD. Asthma. Stem cell transplantation. Immunosuppression | Late autumn, early winter | Pronounced bronchial reactivity | Inhalation ribavirin (for children), IV ribavirin (for immunosuppression) |
Influenza virus | Orthomyxoviruses | Seasonal A and B H1N1 09 H5N1 | 10% - - | 8% - - | Children and the elderly <65 years Contact with birds | >65 years Comorbidities Pregnancy ↑BMI Pregnancy Homeless individuals Obesity Neutropenia and late diagnosis | Late autumn and winter Specific outbreaks in waves Outbreaks throughout the year | General asthenia, flu-like syndrome More commonly pneumonia, ICU admission and mortality Thrombocytopenia and renal failure | Neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir resistance) Amantadine (not in B) Neuraminidase inhibitors (Zanamivir and peramivir for critical patients) High level of neuraminidase inhibitors Amantadines are not favorable |
Parainfluenza virus | Paramyxoviruses | 1, 2, 3, and 4 | 8% | 2% | Geriatric home care | Lung and stem cell transplantation. Frail elderly individuals. | Autumn (parainfluenza 1–2) Spring (parainfluenza 3) | Croup (children with parainfluenza 1) | Ribavirin IV (immunosuppression) |
Metapneumovirus | Paramyxoviruses | - | 8% | % | Children <5 years | RSV co-infection. Immunosuppression. | Late winter and spring | Wheezing, asthma exacerbations | Ribavirin IV (immunosuppression) |
Coronavirus | Coronaviruses | 229E, NL63, OC43, HKU1 SARS | 7% - | 5% - | Geriatric home care Bats and civets in Asia Medical staff | Asthma. Immunosuppression. Elderly. Diabetes mellitus. Hepatitis B. (protective factor in the pediatric population) | Winter Outbreaks throughout the year | Diarrhea Prodromal period with fever and myalgia, followed by respiratory distress | Treatment not proven Chloroquine No specific treatment Corticosteroids are used |
Adenovirus | Adenoviruses | 7, 14, 16 | 3% | 2% | Prisons (outbreak) | Streptococcus pneumoniae | All year round | Conjunctivitis, diarrhea, encephalitis. | Cidofovir (proven in immunosuppression) |
Bocavirus | Parvoviruses | - | 5% | <1% | Children <2 years | Poorly studied | Late autumn, early winter | Otitis media and multi-stage pneumonia | No specific therapy |
Differential features between viral pneumonia and bacterial pneumonia. [62].
Suggests viral etiology | Suggests bacterial etiology | |
|---|---|---|
Age | Under 5 and over 65 years of age | Adults |
Epidemiological data | Seasonal or epidemic outbreaks | Throughout the year |
Course of the disease | Slow onset | Rapid onset |
Clinical signs | Rhinitis and wheezing are more common | High fever and dyspnea are more common |
Total leukocyte count upon admission | <10×106 cells/L | >15×106 cells/L and <4×106 cells/L |
C-reactive protein on admission | <20 mg/L | >60 mg/L |
Serum procalcitonin on admission | <0.1 mcg/L | >0.5 mcg/L (>1 mcg/L with higher specificity) |
Chest X-ray | Bilateral interstitial infiltrates | Lobar alveolar infiltrates |
Response to antibiotic therapy | Slow response or no response | Rapid |
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix C. Patient Information
Viral pneumonia is an acute disease characterized by inflammation developing in the lungs. This inflammation is caused by respiratory viruses, most commonly following an acute respiratory viral infection (ARVI). Sometimes viruses and bacteria can be detected in patients with pneumonia simultaneously. Pneumonia is classified as community-acquired if it develops outside of a hospital or other healthcare facility.
Microorganisms usually enter the lungs via the respiratory tract (trachea, bronchi). However, pneumonia develops only if the human body fails to eliminate the potential pathogen in a timely manner (e.g., weakened immunity, a large load of pathogens entering the lungs) or if the pathogen is highly virulent. Pneumonia can occur at any age, but it is more common in older adults (especially those over 65 years old) and in individuals with chronic comorbidities such as heart failure, diabetes mellitus, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Risk factors contributing to the development of pneumonia include hypothermia, smoking, alcohol abuse, and the use of immunosuppressant medications.
As a result of inflammation, secretions accumulate in the lungs, which can impair oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange and lead to dyspnea (difficulty breathing). In pneumonia, inflammation frequently spreads to the bronchi, causing cough and sputum production, as well as the pleura (the serous membrane covering the lungs). This is accompanied by chest pain during coughing and breathing. In most patients, pneumonia is accompanied by fever (usually above 380C), chills, asthenia, fatigue, and heavy night sweats. The disease may be preceded by cold symptoms (sore throat, runny nose, etc.). Pneumonia, in turn, can worsen the course of existing chronic conditions.
Pneumonia is a serious disease that, if diagnosed untimely or treated improperly, can lead to complications and even death. Therefore, if you suspect you have pneumonia, you should consult a doctor immediately.
Various methods are used to diagnose pneumonia. If pneumonia is suspected, your doctor will take a detailed history, perform a physical examination, and auscultate (listen to) your lungs using a special device. Additional tests will be ordered (usually blood tests), and if you are treated in a hospital, you may be asked to collect sputum for analysis to identify the causative microorganism. To confirm lung lesions and assess their extent, a chest X-ray or computed tomography (CT) scan will be performed.
After establishing the diagnosis, the doctor will determine the nature and severity of the pneumonia, decide whether you should be treated on an outpatient basis or in a hospital, and prescribe treatment.
In pneumonia, it is also recommended to temporarily limit excessive physical activity and drink an adequate amount of fluids.
To prevent pneumonia, it is important to follow general health-promoting measures, such as smoking cessation, regular physical activity, and adequate, balanced nutrition. Some patients at high risk for complications from influenza or coronavirus infection will be offered annual vaccination to prevent influenza and COVID-19, and patients with a high likelihood of developing severe pneumococcal infections will be offered pneumococcal vaccination.
The key to successful treatment of pneumonia is disciplined and full compliance with the doctor's recommendations and prescriptions.
How to protect yourself against respiratory infections:
1. Avoid hypothermia. It is especially important to keep your feet warm and avoid breathing cold air through an open mouth in cold weather. Do not stay outside in severe frost for more than 20 minutes. Do not go outside in freezing weather while intoxicated or drink hot beverages right before going out, as this promotes hypothermia. You should also avoid going outside while heavily sweating. Avoid prolonged exposure to direct airflow from air conditioners and drafts.
2. Avoid close contact with individuals suffering from ARVI. Do not share tableware.
3. Wear a mask in public places. However, a mask is only effective until it becomes damp (from sweat, etc.).
4. Rinse the nasopharynx and oropharynx with water after visiting public places.
5. Chemoprophylaxis.
If you fall ill, it is recommended to seek medical care at a polyclinic or call a doctor to your home (if the temperature exceeds 38.5°C). Do not self-medicate!
It is especially important to seek medical care in case of high body temperature, dyspnea, persistent headache, repeated vomiting that brings no relief, or a pronounced drop in blood pressure!
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. Scales and algorithms for assessing prognosis and severity of VP
Russian title: PORT (PSI) Scale
Original title: PORT (Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team) Scale or Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI)
Source (validated publication): Fine M., Auble T., Yealy D. et al. A prediction rule to identify low risk patients with community acquired pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997; 336 (4): 243–250.
Type (underline):
scale
assessment index
questionnaire
other (specify)
Purpose: assessment of the risk of adverse outcome in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Content (template):
Algorithm for assessing the risk of an adverse prognosis

Table 1. Scoring of risk factors for an adverse prognosis
Parameter | Score |
|---|---|
Demographic characteristics | |
Male | age (years) |
Female | age (years) - 10 |
Nursing home / long-term care facility resident | + 10 |
Comorbidities | |
Malignant neoplasm | + 30 |
Serious chronic liver disease | + 20 |
Congestive heart failure | + 10 |
Cerebrovascular diseases | + 10 |
Serious chronic renal disease | + 10 |
Physical signs | |
Impaired consciousness | + 20 |
Respiratory rate >30/min | + 20 |
Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg | + 20 |
Temperature <35°C or >40°C | + 15 |
Pulse >125/min | + 10 |
Laboratory and radiological findings | |
Arterial blood pH <7.35 | + 30 |
Blood urea nitrogen >9 mmol/L | + 20 |
Serum sodium <130 mmol/L | + 20 |
Serum glucose >14 mmol/L | + 10 |
Hematocrit <30% | + 10 |
PaO2 <60 mmHg or SaO2 <90% | + 10 |
Pleural effusion | + 10 |
Table 2. Risk classes and clinical profile of a patient with CAP
Risk class | I | II | III | IV | V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Points | - | <70 | 71-90 | 91-130 | >130 |
Mortality, % | 0,1-0,4 | 0,6-0,7 | 0,9-2,8 | 8,5-9,3 | 27-31,1 |
Site of care | Outpatient | Outpatient | Short-term hospitalization | Inpatient setting | Inpatient (ICU) |
Key (interpretation): the scale includes 20 clinical, laboratory, and radiological signs of CAP. The risk class is determined by stratifying the patient into one of five groups. This uses a two-step scoring system based on the analysis of prognostic-significant demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiological parameters.
During the development and subsequent validation of the scale, researchers established that mortality rates are: for class I – 0.1-0.4%; class II – 0.6-0.7%; class III – 0.9-2.8%; class IV – 8.5-9.3%; class V – 27.0-31.1%
Notes: CAP is generally associated with an unfavorable prognosis; accordingly, it is important to assess the risk of death in patients.
Appendix G2. CURB/CRB-65 Scale.
Russian name: CURB/CRB-65 scale
Original name: CURB-65 (confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure); CRB-65 (confusion, respiratory rate, blood pressure)
Source (validated publication):
Lim W., van der Eerden M., Laing R. et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003; 58 (5): 377– 382.
Bauer T., Ewig S., Marre R. et al. CRB-65 predicts death from community acquired pneumonia. J. Intern. Med 2006; 260 (1): 93–101.
Type (underline):
assessment scale
index
questionnaire
other (specify)
Purpose: assessment of the risk of adverse outcome in CAP
Content (template):
I. Algorithm for assessing the risk of unfavorable prognosis and choosing the site of care in CAP using the CURB-65 scale

II. Algorithm for assessing the risk of unfavorable prognosis and choosing the site of care in CAP using the CRB-65 scale

Key (interpretation): an approach to assessing the risk of adverse outcome in CAP involving the analysis of five signs:
altered mental status caused by pneumonia;
blood urea nitrogen >7 mmol/L (for the CURB-65 scale only);
tachypnea ≥30/min;
decrease in systolic blood pressure (BP) <90 mm Hg or diastolic ≤60 mm Hg;
patient age ≥65 years.
The presence of each sign is scored as 1 point. The total score can range from 0 to 5 points, with the mortality risk increasing as the total score rises. CRB-65 is characterized by the absence of the laboratory parameter blood urea nitrogen in the evaluation criteria, which simplifies the use of this scale in outpatients and in the emergency department of a medical organization
Notes: The CURB/CRB-65 scales are of high importance in assessing the risk of death and choosing the site of care for patients with CAP.
Appendix G3. IDSA/ATS Severe CAP Criteria, 2007.
Russian name: IDSA/ATS Severe CAP Criteria, 2007
Original name: 2007 Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Criteria for Defining Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia
Source (validation publication):
Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. American Thoracic Society. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:S27–S72.
Brown SM, Jones BE, Jephson AR, et al. Validation of the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society 2007 guidelines for severe community-acquired pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:3010–3016.
Phua J, See KC, Chan YH, et al. Validation and clinical implications of the IDSA/ATS minor criteria for severe community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax. 2009;64:598–603
Chalmers JD, Taylor JK, Mandal P, et al. Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society minor criteria for intensive care unit admission in community- acquired pneumonia patients without major criteria or contraindications to intensive care unit care. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;53:503–511
Type (underline):
rating scale
index
questionnaire
other (specify)
Purpose: identification of patients with severe CAP who require urgent hospitalization in the ICU by evaluating "major" and "minor" criteria associated with increased mortality
Content (template):
IDSA/ATS Severe CAP Criteria, 2007
"Major" criteria: Severe respiratory failure (requiring mechanical ventilation) Septic shock (requiring vasopressors) |
|---|
"Minor" criteria1: Respiratory rate >30/min PaO2/FiO2 ≤250 Multilobar infiltration Impaired consciousness Uremia (blood urea nitrogen2 ≥20 mg/dL) Leukopenia (leukocytes <4x109/L) Thrombocytopenia (platelets <100x1012/L) Hypothermia (<360C) Hypotension requiring aggressive fluid resuscitation |
1 additional criteria – hypoglycemia (in patients without diabetes mellitus), hyponatremia, metabolic acidosis/elevated lactate unexplained by other causes, cirrhosis, asplenia, alcohol overdose/sudden withdrawal in dependent patients
2 blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL) = urea (mmol/L) * 2.8
Key (interpretation): The IDSA/ATS algorithm is based on two "major" and nine "minor" criteria associated with increased mortality in CAP. The presence of one "major" or three "minor" criteria is an indication for patient admission to the ICU. When making a decision, especially in borderline situations, additional criteria can be taken into account along with the nine "minor" criteria (see above).
Notes: The IDSA/ATS severe CAP criteria help identify patients with severe CAP and assess the need for their transfer to the ICU.
Appendix G4. SMART-COP/SMRT-CO Scale.
Russian name: SMART-COP/SMRT-CO Scale
Original name: SMART-COP (systolic blood pressure, multilobar infiltration, albumin, respiratory rate, tachycardia, confusion, oxygenation, pH); SMRT-CO (systolic blood pressure, multilobar infiltration, respiratory rate, tachycardia, confusion, oxygenation); Source (validation publication):
Charles P., Fine M., Ramirez J. et al. Validation of SMART-COP: a pneumoniae severity assessment tool for predicting with patients will need intensive respiratory or inotropic support (IRIS). In: 47th ICAAC. Chicago; 2007:Abstr: L1156a.
Charles P., Wolfe R., Whitby M. et al. SMART-COP: A tool for predicting the need for intensive respiratory or vasopressor support in community-acquired pneumonia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008; 47 (3): 375–384.
Chalmers J., Singanayagam A., Hill A. Predicting the need for mechanical ventilation and / or inotropic support for young adults admitted to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008; 47 (12):1571–1574.
Type (underline):
rating scale
index
questionnaire
other (specify)
Purpose: assessment of CAP severity by identifying patients requiring intensive respiratory support and vasopressor infusion to maintain adequate blood pressure
Content (template):
1. Parameters evaluated in the SMART-COP/SMRT-CO scale
Indicator value | Points | |
|---|---|---|
S | Systolic BP <90 mm Hg | 2 |
M | Multilobar infiltration on chest X-ray | 1 |
A | Plasma albumin level <3.5 g/dL* | 1 |
R | Respiratory rate >25/min in age <50 years and >30/min in age >50 years | 1 |
T | Heart rate >125/min | 1 |
C | Impaired consciousness | 1 |
O | Oxygenation: PaO2* <70 mm Hg or SpO2 <94% or PaO2/FiO2 <333 in age <50 years PaO2* <60 mm Hg or SpO2 <90% or PaO2/FiO2 <250 in age >50 years | 2 |
P | Arterial blood pH* <7.35 | 2 |
Total score |
* Not evaluated in the SMRT-CO scale
2. SMART-COP Interpretation
Points | Need for respiratory support and vasopressors |
|---|---|
0-2 | Low risk |
3-4 | Moderate risk (1 in 8) |
5-6 | High risk (1 in 3) |
>7 | Very high risk (2 in 3) |
3. SMRT-CO Interpretation
Points | Need for respiratory support and vasopressors |
|---|---|
0 | Very low risk |
1 | Low risk (1 in 20) |
2 | Moderate risk (1 in 10) |
3 | High risk (1 in 6) |
>4 | High risk (1 in 3) |
Key (Interpretation): The SMART-COP score provides a point-based evaluation of clinical, laboratory, physical, and radiological signs to determine the probabilistic need for intensive care treatments: respiratory support and vasopressors. The modified SMRT-CO version does not require the assessment of parameters such as albumin level, PaO2, and arterial blood pH. The risk of requiring mechanical ventilation or vasopressors according to the SMART-COP scale is high with 5 or more points, and according to the SMRT-CO scale, with 3 or more points.
Notes: The SMART-COP/SMRT-CO score allows assessing the need for patient admission to the ICU.