Amniotic fluid volume anomalies (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios): clinical guidelines

Applies toadults, children2024 editionO40, O41, O41.0, O41.8…

Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults, children. 2024 edition, ICD-10 codes: O40, O41, O41.0, O41.8….

Receive research articles on "Amniotic fluid volume anomalies (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios)"Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in Russian, with figures, sample sizes, and conclusions. Plus updates to Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary based on the 2024 guideline text. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

Amniotic fluid volume anomalies include polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios, evaluated as markers of fetal condition. Key points in the guidelines include ultrasound diagnostic thresholds, etiology workup, dynamic monitoring, and delivery management.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Take a maternal and family history: medications, past illnesses, pregnancy course, heredity, and congenital malformations in relatives. LRE C, LTD 5. → in text
  2. If the fundal height increases by 3 cm more than expected for gestational age or with rapid uterine growth, rule out polyhydramnios and/or macrosomia. LRE C, LTD 5. → in text
  3. If oligohydramnios is suspected, measure fundal height; in case of suspected fluid leakage or watery discharge, perform a speculum examination and rupture of membranes tests. LRE C, LTD 4. → in text
  4. Before 18 weeks, assess AF volume subjectively or by MVP; after 18 weeks, AFI may be used. In multiple pregnancies, use MVP exclusively. LRE C, LTD 4. → in text
  5. For oligohydramnios, use the thresholds of AFI ≤5 cm or MVP ≤2 cm; MVP is preferred in oligohydramnios, as AFI more frequently leads to overdiagnosis and induction without improving outcomes. LRE C, LTD 4. → in text
  6. In case of abnormal AF volume, perform a detailed transabdominal ultrasound of the uterus and appendages to search for fetal anomalies; if congenital malformations/chromosomal abnormalities are suspected — prognosis assessment, genetic counseling, invasive prenatal diagnosis, or DNA screening. LRE C, LTD 5. → in text
  7. In idiopathic polyhydramnios before 35 weeks, measure middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity (MCA PSV) to rule out fetal anemia, even without hydrops. LRE C, LTD 4. → in text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

What ultrasound thresholds should be considered oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios?

Oligohydramnios — AFI ≤5 cm or MVP ≤2 cm. Polyhydramnios — AFI ≥25 cm or MVP ≥8 cm. → in text

What is better to use when oligohydramnios is suspected — AFI or MVP?

The text states that MVP is more appropriate in oligohydramnios: AFI increases the frequency of oligohydramnios diagnosis and labor induction without improving perinatal outcomes. → in text

Is it necessary to screen for diabetes mellitus in polyhydramnios?

Yes, a pregnant woman with polyhydramnios undergoes additional workup to rule out diabetes. Repeat screening for gestational diabetes mellitus can be considered if polyhydramnios is detected in the third trimester and/or more than 1 month has passed since screening. → in text

When is genetic diagnostics needed for abnormal AF volume?

In the presence of fetal congenital malformations combined with oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios, prognosis assessment, medical genetic counseling, and invasive prenatal diagnosis are indicated. In severe polyhydramnios, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) should be considered, and if the patient declines the invasive procedure, DNA screening. → in text

How should a pregnant woman be monitored after the detection of oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios?

For oligohydramnios — weekly MVP and CTG, fetometry every 2 weeks. For isolated mild polyhydramnios, additional ultrasound monitoring is not required, while for moderate and severe polyhydramnios, ultrasound is performed every 1–3 weeks. → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
820, edition 1 (ID 820_1)
Publication date
November 25, 2024
Age category
adults, children
ICD-10 codes
O40O41O41.0O41.8O41.9
Specialties
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Developers
Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Rubricator — 820_1

List of Abbreviations

AF

Amniotic fluid

ultrasound

Ultrasound examination

MVP

Maximum vertical pocket

AFI

Amniotic fluid index

CR

Preterm birth

PROM

Premature rupture of membranes

PRK

Postpartum hemorrhage

NVP

Non-immune hydrops fetalis

CMA

Chromosomal microarray analysis

MCA-PSV

Middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity

IPD

Invasive prenatal diagnosis

NIPS

Non-invasive prenatal screening

GDM

Gestational diabetes mellitus

Terms and Definitions

See Section 1.1.

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Amniotic fluid (AF) volume anomalies include its increase – polyhydramnios and decrease – oligohydramnios (extreme form: complete absence of amniotic fluid – anhydramnios) (1). Assessment of AF is an indicator reflecting fetal well-being (2).

A reliable assessment that allows rapid, accurate, non-invasive, and real-time measurement of AF volume is ultrasound examination (ultrasound) (3)

The amount of AF should be evaluated either subjectively, defining it as "normal" or "abnormal" (decreased or increased), or semiquantitatively, by measuring the maximum vertical pocket (MVP) of amniotic fluid or the amniotic fluid index (AFI) (4). An abnormal amount of AF may indicate a complicated pregnancy, or a pregnancy that is in the “at-risk” pregnancy zone (5).

Traditionally, oligohydramnios is defined as an AFI ≤ 5 cm or MVP ≤ 2 cm (1,6), whereas polyhydramnios is defined as an AFI ≥ 25 cm or MVP ≥ 8 cm (1,7,8);

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

Amniotic fluid (AF) is the fluid surrounding the fetus. Early in pregnancy, AF is largely a product of maternal serum and resembles plasma due to hydrostatic and osmotic pressure. After 8 weeks of gestation, the fetal kidneys begin to function and produce urine, which becomes a key component of AF after 23–25 weeks (9). Amniotic fluid has a weakly alkaline or neutral reaction. During normal pregnancy, the amniotic fluid volume changes as follows: 6 weeks – 5 mL; 10 weeks – 30 mL; 16 weeks – 180 mL; 20 weeks – 350 mL; 22 weeks – 650 mL; 28 weeks – 950 mL; 30 weeks – 900 mL; 40 weeks – 750 mL (6,10). Alterations in fetal homeostasis affect the volume of fetal urine production, swallowing, and fluid secretion by the lungs; in this regard, the AF volume indirectly reflects the fetal condition. The daily volume of urine excreted by the fetus is approximately 30% of its body weight (11). The rate of fetal urination decreases in conditions associated with placental dysfunction (e.g., preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction) and increases in conditions associated with heart failure (e.g., fetal anemia, supraventricular tachycardia, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome) (12). The intensity of fetal swallowing increases as pregnancy progresses, reaching a maximum by the 3rd trimester. Impairments of swallowing are observed in fetuses with neurological anomalies, such as anencephaly, as well as with esophageal and duodenal obstruction (13). The fetal lungs actively secrete fluid; approximately 50% of this fluid (170 mL/day) is swallowed, and the remainder enters the amniotic cavity, which serves as the basis for fetal lung maturity testing (14). Fetal urination and swallowing, lung fluid secretion, and intramembranous absorption (exchange between AF and the fetal bloodstream) make the greatest contributions to the AF volume; the integration and balance between fluid influx and efflux via these pathways determine the final AF volume (15). The total amount of AF does not change significantly from day to day, yet a complete turnover occurs daily. In the 3rd trimester, within 24 hours, amniotic fluid turnover reaches a volume of 1000 mL (16). Maternal pathologies also affect fetal homeostasis. Thus, severe dehydration increases blood osmolarity. Similarly, maternal hyperglycemia can lead to increased fetal diuresis and polyhydramnios (17).

The role of the amnion in controlling the volume of amniotic fluid, specifically its function in absorbing fluid from the uterine cavity, continues to be studied. The fetal membranes represent a multilayered membrane with a through-transport system, including a network of intercellular channels between amniocytes, the porous structure of their basement layer, the reticular structure of the compact layer, clefts among cytotrophoblast cells, a permeable matrix, and finally, maternal microvessels in the decidua (6,10). Morphological or functional impairments of the fetal membranes caused by various exo- or endogenous factors (infections, hormonal imbalance, extragenital maternal pathology, substance abuse) can lead to amniotic fluid volume abnormalities.

Moderate polyhydramnios is most often idiopathic; the two most common pathological causes of polyhydramnios are maternal diabetes mellitus and congenital fetal anomalies. Additionally, other causes include congenital infection and alloimmunization (see Table 1) (18).

Table 1

Fetal/Neonatal Causes of Polyhydramnios

Impaired swallowing

Excessive urine production

GI obstruction

Neuromuscular

Craniofacial

Renal/Urinary tract

Cardiac

Osmotic diuresis/Other

Duodenal atresia

Myotonic dystrophy

Cleft lip/palate

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Structural cardiac anomaly

Diabetes

Tracheoesophageal fistula

Arthrogryposis

Micrognathia

Mesoblastic nephroma

Tachyarrhythmia

Hydrops

Mediastinal tumor

Intracranial anomaly

Neck mass

Bartter syndrome[1]

Sacrococcygeal teratoma

Idiopathic

Diaphragmatic hernia

Chorioangioma*

*Association with polyhydramnios is characteristic of large sizes (≥5 cm) (19).

An abnormal amniotic fluid volume, especially in combination with other ultrasound markers, may be associated with chromosomal abnormalities, copy number variations (numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations, including at the submicroscopic level - microdeletion syndromes), and monogenic disorders (20,21).

The frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in apparently isolated idiopathic polyhydramnios is 2.1%, and the cumulative frequency of monogenic disorders reaches 5.6% (22).

[1] Bartter syndrome is a rare genetic mutation involving a defect in the loop of Henle, inherited in an autosomal recessive manner; the primary link in the pathogenesis is the loss of the kidneys' ability to retain potassium.

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

Polyhydramnios occurs in 1-2% of all pregnancies and is frequently an incidental finding in asymptomatic women (23,24). In term pregnancies, the prevalence of idiopathic polyhydramnios is 0.3% (25). Two types of polyhydramnios are distinguished: acute and chronic polyhydramnios, which differ in the rate of amniotic fluid accumulation. Therefore, assessing the amniotic fluid volume dynamically throughout pregnancy is of great importance.

If the etiology of excessive amniotic fluid volume is not determined, polyhydramnios is termed "idiopathic"; it accounts for approximately 60-70% of polyhydramnios cases in published studies and is diagnosed in about 1% of pregnancies (26). Oligohydramnios complicates 4.4% of all term pregnancies, whereas in preterm gestation the frequency of oligohydramnios is less than 1% (27).

Amniotic fluid volume abnormalities, both oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios, are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Specifically, a study examining pregnancy outcomes in women with oligohydramnios (AFI ≤5 cm) compared to women with AFI >5 cm revealed that oligohydramnios was more frequently associated with: labor induction (42 vs. 18%), stillbirth (1.4 vs. 0.3%), fetal distress (48 vs. 39%), a higher rate of neonatal intensive care unit admission (7 vs. 2%), meconium aspiration (1 vs. 0.01%), and neonatal mortality (5 vs. 0.3%) (28). In a similar study evaluating adverse outcomes of idiopathic polyhydramnios, an increased rate of obstetric complications (such as preterm birth, fetal malpresentation, various fetal developmental anomalies) and a 2- to 5-fold increase in perinatal mortality were reported (29). It is worth noting that polyhydramnios increases perinatal mortality to a lesser extent than oligohydramnios (30).

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

O40 – Polyhydramnios

O41 – Other disorders of amniotic fluid and membranes

O41.0 – Oligohydramnios (oligohydramnios without mention of rupture of membranes)

O41.8 – Other specified disorders of amniotic fluid and membranes

O41.9 – Disorder of amniotic fluid and membranes, unspecified

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

Table No. 1 (1,31)

Severity grades of polyhydramnios

AFI, cm

Mild

25-30

Moderate

30,1-35,0

Severe (marked polyhydramnios)

≥35,1

Mild polyhydramnios accounts for approximately 65-70% of all cases, moderate for 20%, and severe for <15% (31). The likelihood of a congenital fetal anomaly is significantly higher with a greater degree of polyhydramnios (32).

Table No. 2

Classification of oligohydramnios severity (33)

Severity grade of oligohydramnios

AFI, cm

Mild

4,1-5,0

Moderate

2,1-4,0

Severe (marked oligohydramnios)

0-2,0

Anhydramnios

the extreme degree of oligohydramnios, determined by the inability to measure AFI or SDP, while a thin echolucent "rim" may be visualized on the inner surface of the uterus.

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

Pregnant women diagnosed with polyhydramnios or oligohydramnios most often have no specific symptoms and do not present with complaints (34,35). Polyhydramnios may be suspected due to a discrepancy between the fundal height and the gestational age, but more frequently, as with oligohydramnios, it is an incidental finding discovered during an ultrasound performed for other indications (36).

In marked polyhydramnios (see Table 2), patients may complain of dyspnea, a feeling of tightness in the abdomen, and lower extremity edema (34), as well as varicosities of the lower extremities and vulva, and rarely oliguria (due to ureteral compression).

Polyhydramnios, especially in combination with fetal malpresentation, preterm birth (PTB), or preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), can lead to umbilical cord prolapse and/or prolapse of small fetal parts (37). In the postpartum period, polyhydramnios carries higher risks of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) due to uterine overdistention by the excessive amniotic fluid volume (38).

As previously noted, polyhydramnios is most often detected in the third trimester of pregnancy and less frequently at 18-22 weeks of gestation; idiopathic polyhydramnios is most commonly found at 31-36 weeks (36). No association has been reported between idiopathic polyhydramnios and preterm birth. There is evidence that mild polyhydramnios occurs in the majority of cases (approximately 80% overall and 90% in term pregnancies; for details, see Table No. 3) (25).

Table No. 3

Perinatal outcomes according to the severity of polyhydramnios (39)

AFI

SDP

Frequency

Risk of fetal anomalies*

Risk of neonatal anomalies**

Polyhydramnios (all cases), cm

≥24.0

≥8.0

0.3–1.0% of the general population

Mild polyhydramnios, cm

24.0-29.9

8-11

65–70% of polyhydramnios cases

6-10%

1%

Moderate polyhydramnios, cm

30.0-34.9

12-15

20% of polyhydramnios cases

10-15%

2%

Severe polyhydramnios, cm

≥35.0

≥16

<15% of polyhydramnios cases

20-40%

10%

* Probability of antenatal verification (diagnosis)

** Probability of postnatal diagnosis (when not detected prenatally)

The risk of fetal/neonatal developmental anomalies logically correlates with the severity of polyhydramnios. The risk of identifying developmental anomalies in a newborn that were not diagnosed antenatally is 10% in severe polyhydramnios, whereas in mild and moderate polyhydramnios their frequency is only 1% and 2%, respectively (Table 2). This fact highlights the complexity of ultrasound diagnostics in severe polyhydramnios.

It is important to note that idiopathic polyhydramnios is a diagnosis of exclusion (!), and the etiology of increased amniotic fluid volume not identified during pregnancy may become apparent after delivery. Determining the causes of polyhydramnios will depend on its severity, the presence of structural anomalies, and gestational age. First of all, in cases of polyhydramnios, a detailed fetal ultrasound is necessary to rule out developmental anomalies (39). It is important to assess fetal size and growth rate, since idiopathic polyhydramnios may be associated with macrosomia, whereas fetal growth restriction associated with polyhydramnios carries a high risk of genetic abnormalities, most commonly trisomy 13 or 18 (40, 41).

The diagnosis of oligohydramnios in the second trimester is more often associated with fetal developmental anomalies, whereas in the third trimester it is of unclear etiology in the majority of cases (in a study by Shipp, idiopathic oligohydramnios in the second trimester accounted for only 4% of cases, whereas in the third trimester it occurred in 52%) (42). In cases of oligohydramnios diagnosed in the second trimester, pulmonary hypoplasia is the most significant predictor of fetal mortality; the mortality rate from second-trimester oligohydramnios can reach up to 90%, with an 87% incidence of pulmonary hypoplasia. The most severe degree of pulmonary hypoplasia occurs with oligohydramnios developing before or between 16–24 weeks of gestation, when the terminal bronchioles and respiratory divisions of the fetal lung develop. A low AFI in the second and early third trimesters also increases the likelihood of limb contractures and congenital defects due to compression syndrome (43).

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

It is recommended to assess amniotic fluid as an integral part of the routine anatomical examination of parafetal structures, which should be performed during all fetal ultrasound scans (1, 8, 43).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comment: Ultrasound is a safe diagnostic method during pregnancy; nevertheless, it should be performed only for medical indications, following the ALARA ("as low as reasonably achievable") concept to reduce the total thermal index applied to the fetus (44).

It is recommended to classify oligohydramnios as AFI <5 cm or SDP ≤2 cm (6, 7); polyhydramnios as AFI >25 cm or SDP >8 cm (1, 7); the use of special gestational age-specific reference tables is also acceptable.

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

It is recommended to perform a detailed fetal ultrasound for the initial assessment of polyhydramnios to evaluate developmental anomalies (18).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comment: It is important to assess fetal growth, as idiopathic polyhydramnios may be associated with macrosomia, whereas fetal growth restriction associated with polyhydramnios carries a high risk of fetal genetic abnormalities, including the most common trisomies of chromosomes 18 and 21 (39–41).

It is recommended to consider chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and in some cases exome/genome sequencing (NGS – next-generation sequencing), when performing invasive prenatal diagnostics in pregnancies with abnormal amniotic fluid levels.

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comment: Indications for prenatal CMA/NGS are described in the clinical guidelines "Application of High-Throughput Sequencing and Molecular Karyotyping on Microarrays in the Prenatal Period" (45).

The diagnosis of oligohydramnios in the second trimester is more often associated with fetal anomalies, whereas in the third trimester it is of unclear etiology in the majority of cases (in a study by Shipp, idiopathic oligohydramnios in the second trimester accounted for only 4% of cases, whereas in the third trimester it occurred in 52%) (42). In cases of oligohydramnios diagnosed in the second trimester, pulmonary hypoplasia is the most significant predictor of fetal mortality; the mortality rate from second-trimester oligohydramnios can reach up to 90%, with an 87% incidence of pulmonary hypoplasia. The most severe degree of pulmonary hypoplasia occurs with oligohydramnios developing before or during 16–24 weeks of gestation, when the terminal sacs of the fetal lung develop. A low AFI in the second and early third trimesters also increases the likelihood of limb contractures and congenital defects due to compression syndrome (42).

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

See Section 1.6

It is recommended to conduct a thorough maternal and family history taking to identify conditions associated with polyhydramnios or oligohydramnios: medication intake, past illnesses, course of pregnancy, family history including congenital developmental anomalies in relatives (35, 46).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

2.2 Physical Examination

It is recommended to assess fetal growth and amniotic fluid volume; a fundal height measuring 3 centimeters greater than expected for gestational age or a rapid increase in uterine size warrants investigation to rule out polyhydramnios and/or macrosomia (34).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

It is recommended to perform a physical examination to determine uterine fundal height in suspected oligohydramnios, as well as a speculum examination and rupture of membranes tests in the presence of complaints of amniotic fluid leakage or watery discharge [1] (47).

LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).

Comment: PPROM accounts for more than 37% of oligohydramnios cases diagnosed in the second and third trimesters (42).

[1] The algorithm for performing a speculum examination, as well as the tests used to diagnose amniotic fluid leakage, are described in the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RUOG) clinical guidelines "Preterm Birth".

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

  • When fetal hydrops is detected, it is recommended, if not previously performed, to determine the mother's ABO blood group and Rh factor, as well as to clarify the family obstetric and hereditary history (18, 70, 103).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

It is recommended to determine IgG and IgM antibodies to TORCH infections and diagnose parvovirus B19 using an available method, even if testing was performed previously (48, 49).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comment: Congenital infections such as parvovirus, cytomegalovirus, or syphilis can lead to polyhydramnios under various pathological conditions, including fetal anemia or cardiac dysfunction. Congenital infection may manifest with additional ultrasound signs such as non-immune fetal hydrops (NIFH), hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, and/or placentomegaly.

  • In cases of polyhydramnios associated with NIFH or additional ultrasound signs of intrauterine infection, it is recommended to perform Doppler ultrasound of the fetal middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity (MCA PSV) to detect fetal anemia (1, 8, 18).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

  • For patients whose personal/family history suggests a hereditary condition, it is recommended to undergo genetic counseling for further evaluation (e.g., in hereditary forms of anemia leading to NIFH and polyhydramnios) (50).

  • It is recommended to perform further evaluation of a pregnant woman with polyhydramnios to rule out diabetes (51).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comment: Maternal diabetes is the cause of polyhydramnios in 8–25% of cases. In diabetes, it is hypothesized that maternal hyperglycemia leads to fetal hyperglycemia followed by osmotic diuresis into the amniotic fluid. This hypothesis is supported by the observation that glucose concentration in the amniotic fluid frequently correlates with amniotic fluid volume (52). There is no evidence supporting the benefit of repeat GDM screening; however, it can be considered if polyhydramnios is detected in the third trimester and/or more than 1 month has passed since the diabetes screening (53).

Alloimmunization[1] can lead to fetal anemia, fetal hydrops, and polyhydramnios.

[1] Alloimmunization, or the formation of maternal antibodies, can lead to varying degrees of transplacental passage of these antibodies into the fetal bloodstream. Depending on the degree of antigenicity, as well as the quantity and type of antibodies involved, this transplacental passage can lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (101).

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

It is recommended to evaluate amniotic fluid volume subjectively or by measuring the maximum vertical pocket (MVP) up to 18 weeks of gestation. After 18 weeks, the amniotic fluid index (AFI) can also be calculated (in multiple pregnancies, use MVP only![1]). Semiquantitative assessment is preferred over subjective assessment due to reproducibility and the ability to evaluate changes during follow-up (8).

LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).

The methodology for performing a semiquantitative assessment of amniotic fluid volume with MVP determination includes the following features (1,8):

  • holding the ultrasound transducer perpendicular to the maternal position;

  • determining clear boundaries of the upper and lower edges of the fluid pocket;

  • measuring the maximum free pocket of amniotic fluid with a width of more than 1 cm;

  • using color Doppler mapping to establish the absence of the umbilical cord when its absence is in doubt.

2.4 Instrumental diagnostics — Anomalies of amniotic fluid volume (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios)

AFI is calculated by summing the values of four vertical amniotic fluid pockets, one in each quadrant of the uterus (8)

Polyhydramnios in singleton pregnancies is defined as an MVP ≥8 cm or an AFI ≥25 cm (54).

It is recommended to use the following threshold values as criteria for oligohydramnios: AFI ≤ 5 cm or MVP ≤ 2 cm (1,6).

LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).

Comment: In cases of oligohydramnios, measuring MVP when assessing amniotic fluid volume appears more appropriate, as the use of AFI increases the frequency of oligohydramnios diagnosis and the rate of labor induction without improving perinatal outcomes (55). Studies comparing ultrasound results with dye-dilution amniotic fluid volume measurement have shown that MVP may be more effective for detecting oligohydramnios, and AFI for detecting polyhydramnios (8,56). When determining AFI, the threshold value is typically considered to be 24 cm or 25 cm, depending on whether the 95th or 97th percentile is chosen (7). In research studies, a value of ≥25 cm is usually chosen as the threshold for polyhydramnios (24). A study by Odibo et al noted that the use of AFI leads to overdiagnosis of oligohydramnios; it is quite possible that the use of MVP may lead to overdiagnosis of polyhydramnios, but further studies on optimal diagnostic methods for polyhydramnios are needed (57). The likelihood of a fetal anomaly is significantly higher with more severe polyhydramnios (58, 70).

LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).

It is recommended, when an abnormal amniotic fluid volume is detected, to perform a detailed transabdominal ultrasound examination of the uterus and appendages to identify fetal anomalies (18).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comment: Severe polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios first detected in early pregnancy should raise high concern regarding the possible causes (18,58) of this phenomenon; in such cases, it is extremely important to study the family history and perform a detailed ultrasound examination (18). When congenital malformations or chromosomal abnormalities of the fetus are suspected, assessment of the prognosis for fetal life and development, genetic counseling, and invasive prenatal diagnosis or cell-free DNA screening are indicated. The clinical decision is made based on the results of a medical concilium, depending on the gestational age and the prognosis for fetal life. When a chorioangioma is identified, its size should be evaluated. Small chorioangiomas are relatively common and rarely cause pregnancy complications, but large (greater than 5 cm) chorioangiomas are associated with the development of non-immune hydrops fetalis and polyhydramnios (19,59). The clinical decision is made based on the results of a medical concilium, depending on the gestational age and the prognosis for fetal life.

It is recommended to measure the middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity (MCA PSV) in the initial evaluation of all cases of idiopathic polyhydramnios up to 35 weeks of gestation, even in the absence of hydrops, to exclude fetal anemia (60).

LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).

Comment: in the vast majority of cases, signs of non-immune hydrops fetalis precede the manifestation of polyhydramnios associated with fetal anemia, although a number of studies show the reverse sequence of events (61).

[1] Read more (99)

2.5 Other Procedures

  • When a fetal congenital malformation is detected in combination with oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios, it is recommended to assess the prognosis for fetal life and development, provide medical genetic counseling, and perform invasive prenatal diagnosis (1,8)

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

It is recommended, in the event of patient refusal of the invasive procedure, to perform non-invasive prenatal screening (cell-free fetal DNA) (62,63).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comment: in cases of isolated oligohydramnios in the absence of ultrasound signs of fetal anomalies, the risk of genetic abnormalities is equal to the general population baseline.

Amniocentesis is recommended for oligohydramnios combined with fetal congenital malformations (102)

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comment: Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) is preferred as a laboratory method, allowing the detection of not only quantitative but also other structural karyotype abnormalities (62,64). If patients refuse amniocentesis (or it is not feasible due to technical difficulties), cell-free DNA screening can be offered (63). If no fetal anomalies are found (in cases of isolated oligohydramnios), the risk of genetic abnormalities is equal to the general population baseline.

Currently, there are no data confirming the efficacy of diagnostic amniocentesis in mild or moderate isolated polyhydramnios (65). However, performing it using CMA is advisable in the presence of severe polyhydramnios, as data show an increase in the frequency of congenital (see table No. 2) and chromosomal anomalies with increasing severity of polyhydramnios (65).

It is recommended in severe polyhydramnios, especially with decreased fetal activity, to consider genetic counseling and testing for neuromuscular diseases, such as congenital myotonic dystrophy[1] (66).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

It is recommended in the presence of severe polyhydramnios to consider CMA, as data show an increase in the frequency of congenital anomalies (see table No. 2) and genetic anomalies with increasing severity of polyhydramnios (67).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

It is recommended to perform fetal magnetic resonance imaging to detect/clarify fetal anomalies not diagnosed by ultrasound, particularly in cases of severe oligohydramnios, since MRI visualization is less limited by the lack of amniotic fluid compared to ultrasound. Performing MRI is advisable to determine pregnancy management tactics. T1- and T2-weighted imaging is preferred over T3-weighted imaging, as the latter can increase amniotic fluid temperature (68).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

[1] Myotonic dystrophy is the most common hereditary form of muscular dystrophy in adults; the disease is characterized by a progressive clinical course, autosomal dominant inheritance, and multisystem involvement (skeletal muscles, myocardium, endocrine system, visual organs, etc.) (2019, Clinical Neurology, Myotonic Dystrophy: Genetics and Polymorphism of Clinical Manifestations).

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

Mild and moderate oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios do not require treatment (34).

Possible options for correcting severe oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios are invasive procedures—amnioinfusion and amnioreduction, respectively.

3.1. Pharmacotherapy

It is not recommended to treat oligohydramnios during pregnancy, despite some evidence of increased amniotic fluid volume resulting from maternal hydration, as the clinical benefits of this method have not yet been established (69).

LeveL of Recommendation BGrade of Evidence 2LeveL of Recommendation B (Grade of Evidence - 2).

Comment: Oral hydration with one to two liters of water can be an alternative to amnioinfusion for temporarily increasing AFI for up to 48 hours, especially in hypovolemic patients. This approach is simpler and safer than intravenous fluid administration or amnioinfusion. Water hydration appears to reduce maternal plasma osmolality and sodium concentration, potentially improving uteroplacental perfusion.

It is not recommended to use #indometacin (M01A – anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids) solely for the purpose of reducing amniotic fluid volume in polyhydramnios (71,72)

LoE CGoE 3Level of Evidence C (Grade of Recommendation - 3).

Comment: It is known that #indometacin, a drug recommended for acute tocolysis[1], reduces fetal urine output (73). However, it has been shown that preterm infants born to mothers who received #indometacin (in utero) experienced decreased urine output and increased serum creatinine concentrations, which in some cases persisted for several weeks (71,74). Furthermore, studies indicate that treatment with #indometacin is associated with an increased risk of other neonatal morbidities, including intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, and necrotizing enterocolitis (72,75).

It is recommended to consider the administration of #indometacin as a deterrent factor in rapidly progressing polyhydramnios requiring serial amnioreductions at a gestational age of less than 32 weeks (76).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comment: Administration is possible only by decision of the medical commission and upon obtaining the patient's informed consent for off-label use of the drug. The optimal dose is unknown; Moise suggested 25 mg every 6 hours per os, under close monitoring. Ultrasound assessment of the amniotic fluid index (AFI) should be performed once or twice a week. If oligohydramnios develops, #indometacin should be discontinued immediately, while monitoring of the AFI continues. Additionally, fetal echocardiography should be considered within the first 24 hours; signs of significant constriction of the ductus arteriosus or the appearance of tricuspid regurgitation require immediate discontinuation of #indometacin (77).

3.2. Other treatment

Amnioinfusion is a procedure in which complex sodium chloride or sodium lactate solution [Potassium chloride + Calcium chloride + Sodium chloride + Sodium lactate]** is injected into the uterine cavity to replace amniotic fluid. This procedure may be performed for the purpose of: prophylactic treatment of oligohydramnios, correction of fetal heart rate abnormalities (predominantly decelerations) due to umbilical cord compression during labor, as well as correction of PPROM manifestations at a gestational age of 26 weeks or more (78–80).

Amnioinfusion is not recommended in the following situations: chorioamnionitis, facilitating external cephalic version for breech presentation, PPROM at a gestational age of less than 26 weeks, prevention of meconium aspiration syndrome, treatment of anhydramnios in the 2nd trimester (to improve visualization during fetal ultrasound) (81–84).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comments: Amnioinfusion may be considered in cases of anhydramnios after weighing the potential benefits and risks to improve the fetal condition and/or as a one-time intervention to improve visualization during fetal ultrasound for a more reliable assessment of fetal anatomy (80). Amnioinfusion only temporarily increases the volume of amniotic fluid and is purely symptomatic therapy.

Severe oligohydramnios or anhydramnios in the 2nd trimester is associated with high mortality due to the development of fetal pulmonary hypoplasia. Several studies have shown that gestational age at the time of membrane rupture (15–28 weeks of gestation), latency period (the duration between membrane rupture and birth), and amniotic fluid index (AFI less than 1–5 cm) can influence the development of pulmonary hypoplasia (85). Nevertheless, amnioinfusion in idiopathic oligohydramnios and in the setting of PPROM may have a positive effect and somewhat reduce mortality from postnatal pulmonary hypoplasia, as well as the risk of orthopedic complications. However, in fetuses with oliguria/anuria resulting from primary renal disease, postnatal dialysis and possibly kidney transplantation will be required in any case.

It is recommended to perform amnioreduction in severe polyhydramnios (see classification) and the presence of severe maternal discomfort and/or dyspnea (86).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comments: the cause of severe polyhydramnios leading to maternal respiratory failure is in most cases congenital fetal malformations (87,86). On average, from 1.5 to 3 liters of amniotic fluid can be removed per procedure (88). However, polyhydramnios usually recurs after amnioreduction, which limits the effectiveness of this procedure. Therefore, subsequent AFI monitoring is indicated every one to three weeks (34,89).

3.3. Delivery

  • In isolated idiopathic oligohydramnios with intact membranes, it is recommended to consider delivery at 36/0–37/6 weeks of gestation or at the time of diagnosis at a later gestational age to improve perinatal outcomes (18, 70, 90, 101).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comment: the optimal timing of delivery in idiopathic oligohydramnios remains controversial (18, 70, 91, 101).

Continuous intrapranatal fetal heart rate monitoring is recommended for patients with oligohydramnios, given the increased risk of umbilical cord compression (92).

LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).

  • In mild idiopathic polyhydramnios, preinduction/induction of labor is not recommended prior to 39 weeks of gestation (90).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

Comment: There is no evidence indicating that induction of labor or preterm birth is associated with improved perinatal outcomes in the setting of mild idiopathic polyhydramnios (93,94).

  • In moderate and severe polyhydramnios, amnioreduction may be recommended prior to delivery to increase the likelihood of vaginal delivery and reduce the risk of postpartum hemorrhage (95).

LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).

Comment: amnioreduction does not contribute to the prolongation of pregnancy; on the contrary, intrauterine interventions, in particular amnioreduction per se, are risk factors for complications such as PPROM and preterm birth (88).

  • In severe polyhydramnios, delivery is recommended in level 3 hospitals due to the high risk of prenatally undiagnosed congenital fetal malformations (18, 70).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

[1] Algorithm and indications for acute tocolysis are described in the RROCOG clinical guidelines "Preterm Birth"

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

Not applicable.

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

  • In oligohydramnios, it is recommended to measure the maximum vertical pocket (MVP) and perform cardiotocography (CTG) weekly, as well as fetal biometry every 2 weeks (96).

LeveL of Recommendation BGrade of Evidence 2LeveL of Recommendation B (Grade of Evidence - 2).

Comment: dynamic monitoring reduces the incidence of unexplained stillbirth.

Additional ultrasound monitoring (transabdominal ultrasound of the uterus and appendages) is not recommended in cases of mild isolated polyhydramnios (18).

LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).

  • In moderate and severe polyhydramnios, it is recommended to perform an ultrasound examination (transabdominal ultrasound of the uterus and appendages) every 1–3 weeks to monitor the AFI and assess cervical length (70).

LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).

It is recommended, in accordance with Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 1130n dated October 20, 2020, at 11 to 14 weeks of gestation, to have ultrasound examinations performed by specialists who have undergone advanced training in first-trimester screening ultrasound and blood sampling for maternal serum markers (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin subunit) (97).

LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).

  • At the second stage, it is recommended for all pregnant women to undergo ultrasound screening at 19–21 weeks of gestation to exclude ultrasound markers of chromosomal abnormalities and congenital malformations, and to recalculate risk using software (98).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

  • In accordance with the Clinical Guidelines "Normal Pregnancy" (2023), to exclude fetal aneuploidy, the patient may be additionally offered DNA screening after 10 weeks of gestation (64).

GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).

6. Organization of Medical Care

Both oligohydramnios and polyhydramnios are common conditions that can have serious consequences for pregnancy outcomes. Healthcare providers caring for pregnant women in antenatal care (obstetrician-gynecologists, midwives, ultrasound diagnostics physicians) must be aware of the parameters requiring dynamic monitoring and possess skills in performing and/or interpreting ultrasound examinations.

The interdisciplinary medical team providing care to the pregnant woman should include all necessary specialists providing care to her and the newborn, including neonatologist-intensivists. Delivery should take place in a level 2–3 obstetric healthcare facility. In severe cases, delivery must take place exclusively in level 3 institutions due to the high risk of admission of the infant to the neonatal intensive care unit and the high probability of detecting developmental anomalies.

A clear interdisciplinary approach to assessing the fetal condition and managing safe delivery leads to a reduction in perinatal complications and improved outcomes (99).

7. Additional Information

Not applicable.

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

№

Quality criteria

Criterion Fulfillment Assessment

1.

First-trimester screening was performed in accordance with Order No. 1130n

Yes/No

2.

Ultrasound screening was performed at 19–21 weeks of gestation to exclude ultrasound markers of chromosomal abnormalities and congenital fetal malformations

Yes/No

3.

TORCH infection screening was performed

Yes/No

4.

Isoimmunization testing was performed in suspected fetal anemia and hydrops

Yes/No

5.

Genetic counseling was performed upon detection of an abnormal amniotic fluid volume on ultrasound

Yes/No

6.

When an abnormal amniotic fluid volume was detected on ultrasound, MVP and/or AFI measurement was performed

Yes/No

7.

When an abnormal amniotic fluid volume was detected, follow-up was performed in 1–3 weeks

Yes/No

8.

When polyhydramnios was detected, MCA-PSV was measured to rule out fetal anemia

Yes/No

References

Show references
  1. Khalil A, Sotiriadis A, D’Antonio F, Da Silva Costa F, Odibo A, Prefumo F, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of third-trimester obstetric ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2024 Jan;63(1):131–47. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38166001

  2. Moore TR. The role of amniotic fluid assessment in evaluating fetal well-being. Clin Perinatol [Internet]. 2011 Mar;38(1):33–46, v. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21353088

  3. Dildy GA, Lira N, Moise KJ, Riddle GD, Deter RL. Amniotic fluid volume assessment: comparison of ultrasonographic estimates versus direct measurements with a dye-dilution technique in human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1992 Oct;167(4 Pt 1):986–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1415438

  4. Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Ganzevoort W. Building consensus and standards in fetal growth restriction studies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2018 May;49:117–26. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576470

  5. Dubil EA, Magann EF. Amniotic fluid as a vital sign for fetal wellbeing. Australas J ultrasound Med [Internet]. 2013 May;16(2):62–70. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28191176

  6. Morris JM, Thompson K, Smithey J, Gaffney G, Cooke I, Chamberlain P, et al. The usefulness of ultrasound assessment of amniotic fluid in predicting adverse outcome in prolonged pregnancy: a prospective blinded observational study. BJOG [Internet]. 2003 Nov;110(11):989–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14592583

  7. Moore TR, Cayle JE. The amniotic fluid index in normal human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1990 May;162(5):1168–73. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2187347

  8. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, Bilardo CM, Chalouhi GE, Da Silva Costa F, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2022 Jun;59(6):840–56. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592929

  9. Underwood MA, Gilbert WM, Sherman MP. Amniotic fluid: not just fetal urine anymore. J Perinatol [Internet]. 2005 May;25(5):341–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15861199

  10. Kvetnoy IМ, Kolobov А V. Extraembryonic and amniotic structures in normal and complicated pregnancies. Ed. V.E. Radzinsky and A.P. Milovanova. J Obstet women’s Dis [Internet]. 2005 Nov 1;54(3):114–6. Available from: https://journals.eco-vector.com/jowd/article/view/83494

  11. Lee SM, Park SK, Shim SS, Jun JK, Park JS, Syn HC. Measurement of fetal urine production by three-dimensional ultrasonography in normal pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2007 Sep;30(3):281–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17628483

  12. Stigter RH, Mulder EJH, Bruinse HW, Visser GHA. Fetal urine production in late pregnancy. ISRN Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2011;2011:345431. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21776399

  13. Grassi R, Farina R, Floriani I, Amodio F, Romano S. Assessment of fetal swallowing with gray-scale and color Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet]. 2005 Nov;185(5):1322–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16247157

  14. Jellyman JK, Cheung CY, Brace RA. Amniotic fluid volume responses to esophageal ligation in fetal sheep: contribution of lung liquid. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2009 Mar;200(3):313.e1–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19114273

  15. Brace RA. Progress toward understanding the regulation of amniotic fluid volume: water and solute fluxes in and through the fetal membranes. Placenta [Internet]. 1995 Jan;16(1):1–18. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7716121

  16. Brace RA. Physiology of amniotic fluid volume regulation. Clin Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1997 Jun;40(2):280–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9199840

  17. Moore TR. Amniotic fluid dynamics reflect fetal and maternal health and disease. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2010 Sep;116(3):759–65. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20733463

  18. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org, Dashe JS, Pressman EK, Hibbard JU. SMFM Consult Series #46: Evaluation and management of polyhydramnios. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2018 Oct;219(4):B2–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30048635

  19. Sepulveda W, Alcalde JL, Schnapp C, Bravo M. Perinatal outcome after prenatal diagnosis of placental chorioangioma. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2003 Nov;102(5 Pt 1):1028–33. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14672481

  20. Shi P, Hou Y, Chen D, Ren H, Xia Y, Kong X. Estimate of genetic variants using CNV-Seq for fetuses with oligohydramnios or polyhydramnios. Mol Genet genomic Med [Internet]. 2023 Jan;11(1):e2089. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36398477

  21. Wu X, Li Y, Lin N, Su L, Xie X, Liang B, et al. Evaluation of genetic variants using chromosomal microarray analysis for fetuses with polyhydramnios. BMC Med Genomics [Internet]. 2022 Mar 30;15(1):73. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35354480

  22. Tsakmaki E, Ververi A, Chatzakis C, Cavoretto P, Sotiriadis A. Genomic abnormalities in apparently isolated polyhydramnios and the role of confirmed fetal phenotype: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM [Internet]. 2024 Aug 21;101469. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39179156

  23. Cardwell MS. Polyhydramnios: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv [Internet]. 1987 Oct;42(10):612–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3118281

  24. Khan S, Donnelly J. Outcome of pregnancy in women diagnosed with idiopathic polyhydramnios. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2017 Feb;57(1):57–62. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28251633

  25. Luo QQ, Zou L, Gao H, Zheng YF, Zhao Y, Zhang WY. Idiopathic polyhydramnios at term and pregnancy outcomes: a multicenter observational study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2017 Jul;30(14):1755–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27625160

  26. Golan A, Wolman I, Saller Y, David MP. Hydramnios in singleton pregnancy: sonographic prevalence and etiology. Gynecol Obstet Invest [Internet]. 1993;35(2):91–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8449451

  27. Hou L, Wang X, Hellerstein S, Zou L, Ruan Y, Zhang W. Delivery mode and perinatal outcomes after diagnosis of oligohydramnios at term in China. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2020 Jul;33(14):2408–14. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30486718

  28. Casey BM, McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Lucas MJ, Santos R, Twickler DM, et al. Pregnancy outcomes after antepartum diagnosis of oligohydramnios at or beyond 34 weeks’ gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2000 Apr;182(4):909–12. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10764472

  29. Magann EF, Chauhan SP, Doherty DA, Lutgendorf MA, Magann MI, Morrison JC. A review of idiopathic hydramnios and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol Surv [Internet]. 2007 Dec;62(12):795–802. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18005456

  30. Magann EF, Doherty DA, Lutgendorf MA, Magann MI, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC. Peripartum outcomes of high-risk pregnancies complicated by oligo- and polyhydramnios: a prospective longitudinal study. J Obstet Gynaecol Res [Internet]. 2010 Apr;36(2):268–77. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20492376

  31. Dashe JS, McIntire DD, Ramus RM, Santos-Ramos R, Twickler DM. Hydramnios: anomaly prevalence and sonographic detection. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2002 Jul;100(1):134–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12100815

  32. Lazebnik N, Many A. The severity of polyhydramnios, estimated fetal weight and preterm delivery are independent risk factors for the presence of congenital malformations. Gynecol Obstet Invest [Internet]. 1999;48(1):28–32. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10394088

  33. Zilberman Sharon N, Pekar-Zlotin M, Kugler N, Accart Z, Nimrodi M, Melcer Y, et al. Oligohydramnios: how severe is severe? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2022 Dec;35(25):5754–60. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33645394

  34. Hamza A, Herr D, Solomayer EF, Meyberg-Solomayer G. Polyhydramnios: Causes, Diagnosis and Therapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd [Internet]. 2013 Dec;73(12):1241–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24771905

  35. Peipert JF, Donnenfeld AE. Oligohydramnios: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv [Internet]. 1991 Jun;46(6):325–39. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2067755

  36. Odibo IN, Newville TM, Ounpraseuth ST, Dixon M, Lutgendorf MA, Foglia LM, et al. Idiopathic polyhydramnios: persistence across gestation and impact on pregnancy outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. 2016 Apr;199:175–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26937648

  37. Kollmann M, Voetsch J, Koidl C, Schest E, Haeusler M, Lang U, et al. Etiology and perinatal outcome of polyhydramnios. Ultraschall Med [Internet]. 2014 Aug;35(4):350–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24729436

  38. Wiegand SL, Beamon CJ, Chescheir NC, Stamilio D. Idiopathic Polyhydramnios: Severity and Perinatal Morbidity. Am J Perinatol [Internet]. 2016 Jun;33(7):658–64. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26862725

  39. Walter A, Calite E, Berg C, Gembruch U, Müller A, Geipel A. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction with polyhydramnios, etiology and impact on postnatal outcome. Sci Rep [Internet]. 2022 Jan 10;12(1):415. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35013541

  40. Narayan R, Peres M, Kesby G. Diagnosis of antenatal Bartter syndrome. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2016;43(3):453–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27328514

  41. Sickler GK, Nyberg DA, Sohaey R, Luthy DA. Polyhydramnios and fetal intrauterine growth restriction: ominous combination. J Ultrasound Med [Internet]. 1997 Sep;16(9):609–14. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9321781

  42. Shipp TD, Bromley B, Pauker S, Frigoletto FD, Benacerraf BR. Outcome of singleton pregnancies with severe oligohydramnios in the second and third trimesters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1996 Feb;7(2):108–13. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8776235

  43. Simpson L, Khati NJ, Deshmukh SP, Dudiak KM, Harisinghani MG, Henrichsen TL, et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Assessment of Fetal Well-Being. J Am Coll Radiol [Internet]. 2016 Dec;13(12 Pt A):1483–93. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28029583

  44. AIUM-ACR-ACOG-SMFM-SRU Practice Parameter for the Performance of Standard Diagnostic Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations. J Ultrasound Med [Internet]. 2018 Nov;37(11):E13–24. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30308091

  45. Sukhikh SGT, Trofimov TDY, Shubina SJ, Degtyarev DDN, Maslennikov MDN, Mukosei MI., et al. Methodological recommendations «use of prenatal high-throughput sequencing and microarray-based molecular karyotyping». Akush Ginekol (Sofiia) [Internet]. 2024 Mar 29;3-prilojen:25–43. Available from: https://aig-journal.ru/archive/article/44602

  46. Keilman С, Shanks А. Oligohydramnios. StatPearls. 2022.

  47. Hesson A, Langen E. Outcomes in oligohydramnios: the role of etiology in predicting pulmonary morbidity/mortality. J Perinat Med [Internet]. 2018 Oct 25;46(8):948–50. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29924737

  48. Fayyaz H, Rafi J. TORCH screening in polyhydramnios: an observational study. J Matern Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2012 Jul 17;25(7):1069–72. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/14767058.2011.622002

  49. Pasquini L, Seravalli V, Sisti G, Battaglini C, Nepi F, Pelagalli R, et al. Prevalence of a positive TORCH and parvovirus B19 screening in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Prenat Diagn [Internet]. 2016 Mar;36(3):290–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26970557

  50. Blue GM, Kasparian NA, Sholler GF, Kirk EP, Winlaw DS. Genetic counselling in parents of children with congenital heart disease significantly improves knowledge about causation and enhances psychosocial functioning. Int J Cardiol [Internet]. 2015 Jan;178:124–30. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167527314020567

  51. Preda A, Ștefan AG, Preda SD, Comănescu AC, Forțofoiu MC, Vladu MI, et al. Transient Polyhydramnios during Pregnancy Complicated with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Case Report and Systematic Review. Diagnostics [Internet]. 2022 May 28;12(6):1340. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/12/6/1340

  52. Dashe JS, Nathan L, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Correlation between amniotic fluid glucose concentration and amniotic fluid volume in pregnancy complicated by diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2000 Apr;182(4):901–4. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10764470

  53. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Norton ME, Chauhan SP, Dashe JS. Society for maternal-fetal medicine (SMFM) clinical guideline #7: nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2015 Feb;212(2):127–39. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25557883

  54. Pri-Paz S, Khalek N, Fuchs KM, Simpson LL. Maximal amniotic fluid index as a prognostic factor in pregnancies complicated by polyhydramnios. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2012 Jun;39(6):648–53. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21898637

  55. Nabhan AF, Abdelmoula YA. Amniotic fluid index versus single deepest vertical pocket as a screening test for preventing adverse pregnancy outcome. Cochrane database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2008 Jul 16;(3):CD006593. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18646160

  56. Hughes DS, Magann EF, Whittington JR, Wendel MP, Sandlin AT, Ounpraseuth ST. Accuracy of the Ultrasound Estimate of the Amniotic Fluid Volume (Amniotic Fluid Index and Single Deepest Pocket) to Identify Actual Low, Normal, and High Amniotic Fluid Volumes as Determined by Quantile Regression. J Ultrasound Med [Internet]. 2020 Feb;39(2):373–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31423632

  57. Odibo IN, Whittemore BS, Hughes DS, Simmons PM, Ounpraseuth ST, Magann EF. Addition of Color Doppler Sonography for Detection of Amniotic Fluid Disturbances and Its Implications on Perinatal Outcomes. J Ultrasound Med [Internet]. 2017 Sep;36(9):1875–81. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28503847

  58. Simmons PM, Whittington JR, Estrada SM, Ounpraseuth ST, Shnaekel KL, Slaton KB, et al. What is the Impact of Abnormal Amniotic Fluid Volumes on Perinatal Outcomes in Normal Compared with At-Risk Pregnancies? Int J Womens Health [Internet]. 2020;12:805–12. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33116930

  59. Guo D, He S, Lin N, Dai Y, Li Y, Xu L, et al. Genetic disorders and pregnancy outcomes of non-immune hydrops fetalis in a tertiary referral center. BMC Med Genomics [Internet]. 2023 Apr 20;16(1):83. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37081464

  60. Zimmerman R, Carpenter RJ, Durig P, Mari G. Longitudinal measurement of peak systolic velocity in the fetal middle cerebral artery for monitoring pregnancies complicated by red cell alloimmunisation: a prospective multicentre trial with intention-to-treat. BJOG [Internet]. 2002 Jul;109(7):746–52. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12135209

  61. Andrei C, Vladareanu R. The value of reference ranges for middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in the management of rhesus alloimmunized pregnancies. Maedica (Buchar) [Internet]. 2012 Jan;7(1):14–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23118814

  62. de Wit MC, Srebniak MI, Govaerts LCP, Van Opstal D, Galjaard RJH, Go ATJI. Additional value of prenatal genomic array testing in fetuses with isolated structural ultrasound abnormalities and a normal karyotype: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2014 Feb;43(2):139–46. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23897843

  63. Committee Opinion No. 640: Cell-Free DNA Screening For Fetal Aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2015 Sep;126(3):e31–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26287791

  64. Levy B, Wapner R. Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2018 Feb;109(2):201–12. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29447663

  65. Practice Bulletin No. 162: Prenatal Diagnostic Testing for Genetic Disorders. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2016 May;127(5):e108–22. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26938573

  66. Ho G, Cardamone M, Farrar M. Congenital and childhood myotonic dystrophy: Current aspects of disease and future directions. World J Clin Pediatr [Internet]. 2015 Nov 8;4(4):66–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26566479

  67. Sagi-Dain L, Singer A, Falik-Zaccai T, Peleg A, Bar-Shira A, Feingold-Zadok M, et al. The effect of polyhydramnios degree on chromosomal microarray results: a retrospective cohort analysis of 742 singleton pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2021 Sep;304(3):649–56. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33591382

  68. Tocchio S, Kline-Fath B, Kanal E, Schmithorst VJ, Panigrahy A. MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain. Semin Perinatol [Internet]. 2015 Mar;39(2):73–104. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25743582

  69. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM. Maternal hydration for increasing amniotic fluid volume in oligohydramnios and normal amniotic fluid volume. Cochrane database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2002;(1):CD000134. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11869566

  70. Historical Assessment, Practical Management, and Future Recommendations for Abnormal Amniotic Fluid Volumes Julie R. Whittington, Suneet P. Chauhan, Michael P. Wendel, Taylor L. Ghahremani, Megan E. Pagan, Meagen M. Carter, Everett F. Magann J Clin Med. 2024 Aug; 13(16): 4702. Published online 2024 Aug 10. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164702 PMCID: PMC11355879

  71. Butler-O’Hara M, D’Angio CT. Risk of persistent renal insufficiency in premature infants following the prenatal use of indomethacin for suppression of preterm labor. J Perinatol [Internet]. 2002;22(7):541–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12368969

  72. Amin SB, Sinkin RA, Glantz JC. Metaanalysis of the effect of antenatal indomethacin on neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2007 Nov;197(5):486.e1–10. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17980183

  73. Kirshon B, Mari G, Moise KJ. Indomethacin therapy in the treatment of symptomatic polyhydramnios. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1990 Feb;75(2):202–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2405320

  74. Norton ME, Merrill J, Cooper BA, Kuller JA, Clyman RI. Neonatal complications after the administration of indomethacin for preterm labor. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 1993 Nov 25;329(22):1602–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8232428

  75. Hammers AL, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM. Antenatal exposure to indomethacin increases the risk of severe intraventricular hemorrhage, necrotizing enterocolitis, and periventricular leukomalacia: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2015 Apr;212(4):505.e1–13. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25448524

  76. Hwang DS, Mahdy H. Polyhydramnios [Internet]. StatPearls. 2024. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24771905

  77. Moise KJ. Indomethacin therapy in the treatment of symptomatic polyhydramnios. Clin Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1991 Jun;34(2):310–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1868638

  78. Hofmeyr GJ, Lawrie TA. Amnioinfusion for potential or suspected umbilical cord compression in labour. Cochrane database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2012 Jan 18;1(1):CD000013. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22258939

  79. Hofmeyr GJ, Xu H, Eke AC. Amnioinfusion for meconium-stained liquor in labour. Cochrane database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2014 Jan 23;2014(1):CD000014. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24453049

  80. Nageotte MP, Bertucci L, Towers C V, Lagrew DL, Modanlou H. Prophylactic amnioinfusion in pregnancies complicated by oligohydramnios: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 1991 May;77(5):677–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2014078

  81. Hofmeyr GJ, Kiiza JAK. Amnioinfusion for chorioamnionitis. Cochrane database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2016 Aug 24;2016(8):CD011622. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27556818

  82. Fraser WD, Hofmeyr J, Lede R, Faron G, Alexander S, Goffinet F, et al. Amnioinfusion for the prevention of the meconium aspiration syndrome. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2005 Sep 1;353(9):909–17. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16135835

  83. Diguisto C, Winer N, Descriaud C, Tavernier E, Weymuller V, Giraudeau B, et al. Amnioinfusion for women with a singleton breech presentation and a previous failed external cephalic version: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2018 Apr;31(8):993–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28279119

  84. Van Teeffelen S, Pajkrt E, Willekes C, Van Kuijk SMJ, Mol BWJ. Transabdominal amnioinfusion for improving fetal outcomes after oligohydramnios secondary to preterm prelabour rupture of membranes before 26 weeks. Cochrane database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2013 Aug 3;2013(8):CD009952. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23913522

  85. Winn HN, Chen M, Amon E, Leet TL, Shumway JB, Mostello D. Neonatal pulmonary hypoplasia and perinatal mortality in patients with midtrimester rupture of amniotic membranes--a critical analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2000 Jun;182(6):1638–44. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10871491

  86. Dickinson JE, Tjioe YY, Jude E, Kirk D, Franke M, Nathan E. Amnioreduction in the management of polyhydramnios complicating singleton pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2014 Oct;211(4):434.e1–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24881825

  87. Abele H, Starz S, Hoopmann M, Yazdi B, Rall K, Kagan KO. Idiopathic polyhydramnios and postnatal abnormalities. Fetal Diagn Ther [Internet]. 2012;32(4):251–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22760013

  88. Erfani H, Diaz-Rodriguez GE, Aalipour S, Nassr A, Rezaei A, Gandhi M, et al. Amnioreduction in cases of polyhydramnios: Indications and outcomes in singleton pregnancies without fetal interventions. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. 2019 Oct;241:126–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31160132

  89. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 192: Management of Alloimmunization During Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2018 Mar;131(3):e82–90. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29470342

  90. Venturini P, Contu G, Mazza V, Facchinetti F. Induction of labor in women with oligohydramnios. J Matern Neonatal Med [Internet]. 2005 Feb 1;17(2):129–32. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/jmf.17.2.129.132

  91. Oligohydramnios at 340/7–366/7 weeks: observe or deliver. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2011 Sep;205(3):163–4. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002937811001712

  92. Rhoades JS, Stout MJ, Macones GA, Cahill AG. Effect of Oligohydramnios on Fetal Heart Rate Patterns during Term Labor Induction. Am J Perinatol [Internet]. 2019 Jun;36(7):715–22. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30372774

  93. Practice bulletin no. 145: antepartum fetal surveillance. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2014 Jul;124(1):182–92. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24945455

  94. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice S for MFM. Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early-Term Deliveries: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 831. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2021 Jul 1;138(1):e35–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34259491

  95. Soni S, Paidas Teefey C, Gebb JS, Khalek N, Neary K, Miller K, et al. Amnioreduction vs expectant management in pregnancies with moderate to severe polyhydramnios. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM [Internet]. 2023 Dec;5(12):101192. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37858792

  96. Patrelli TS, Gizzo S, Cosmi E, Carpano MG, Di Gangi S, Pedrazzi G, et al. Maternal hydration therapy improves the quantity of amniotic fluid and the pregnancy outcome in third-trimester isolated oligohydramnios: a controlled randomized institutional trial. J Ultrasound Med [Internet]. 2012 Feb;31(2):239–44. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22298867

  97. Park SY, Jang IA, Lee MA, Kim YJ, Chun SH, Park MH. Screening for chromosomal abnormalities using combined test in the first trimester of pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Sci [Internet]. 2016 Sep;59(5):357–66. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27668198

  98. Todros T, Capuzzo E, Gaglioti P. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies. Images Paediatr Cardiol [Internet]. 2001 Apr;3(2):3–18. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3232499

  99. Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ROAG). Clinical guidelines: Multiple pregnancy. 2020;

  100. Agathokleous M, Chaveeva P, Poon LCY, Kosinski P, Nicolaides KH. Meta-analysis of second-trimester markers for trisomy 21. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2013 Mar;41(3):247–61. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23208748

  101. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 764: Medically Indicated Late-Preterm and Early-Term Deliveries. Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2019 Feb;133(2):e151–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30681545

  102. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 1130n dated October 20, 2020, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care in the Profile of 'Obstetrics and Gynecology'" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of Russia on November 12, 2020, No. 60869).

  103. Hamza A, Herr D, Solomayer EF, Meyberg-Solomayer G. Polyhydramnios: Causes, Diagnosis and Therapy. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2013 Dec;73(12):1241-1246. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1360163

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

Authors

  1. Khodzhayeva Zulfiya Sagdullayevna – MD, Professor, Deputy Director for Scientific Work, Institute of Obstetrics, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology Named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  2. Ksenia A. Gorina – Research Fellow, 1st Obstetric Department of Pregnancy Pathology, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  3. Roman V. Kapustin – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott (Saint Petersburg). No conflict of interest

  4. Tamara A. Yarygina – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Ultrasound Diagnostics Department, Moscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology (MONIIAG) named after Academician V.I. Krasnopolsky (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  5. Vladislav V. Kovalev – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ural Institute of Healthcare Management named after A.B. Blokhin (Yekaterinburg). No conflict of interest

  6. Elena V. Kudryavtseva – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Central Research Laboratory, Ural State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health; Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ural Institute of Healthcare Management named after A.B. Blokhin (Yekaterinburg). No conflict of interest

  7. Elena N. Alekseenkova – Junior Research Fellow, Department of Obstetrics and Perinatology, Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott (Saint Petersburg). No conflict of interest.

  8. Igor I. Baranov – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Scientific and Educational Programs, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  9. Anna S. Bolshakova – Geneticist at the Institute of Reproductive Genetics, Candidate of Medical Sciences National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest

  10. Dolgushina Natalia Vitalievna – MD, Professor, Deputy Director – Head of the Department for Organization of Scientific Activities, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  11. Natalia E. Kan – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director for Research, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  12. Natalia I. Klimenchenko – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Senior Research Fellow, 1st Obstetric Department of Pregnancy Pathology, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  13. Klimov Vladimir Anatolievich – PhD, Head of the Medical Care Organization and Information Service, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  14. Elizaveta M. Limonova – PhD student, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  15. Kamilla T. Muminova – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Research Fellow, 1st Obstetric Department of Pregnancy Pathology, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  16. Anastasia V. Nikolaeva – PhD, Chief Physician, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  17. Serov Vladimir Nikolaevich – Academician of the RAS, MD, Professor, Honored Scientist of the RF, President of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Chief Researcher, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  18. Kholin Aleksey Mikhailovich – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Telemedicine Department at the V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.

  19. Roman G. Shmakov – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of MONIIAG (Moscow), Chief Freelance Specialist in Obstetrics of the Russian Ministry of Health. No conflict of interest.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience for these clinical guidelines:

  1. obstetrician-gynecologists

  2. students; residents, PhD students, obstetrician-gynecologists

  3. lecturers, researchers

Table 1. Level of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

There is only a rationale for the mechanism of action or expert opinion

Table 2. Scale for assessing levels of reliable evidence (LRE) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, rehabilitation interventions)

LoE

Definitions

1

Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis

2

Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

Table 3. Grade of Recommendation (GoR) scale for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

GoR

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

  • Federal Law No. 323-FZ "On the Fundamentals of Protecting Citizens' Health in the Russian Federation" dated November 21, 2011.

  • Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 203n dated May 10, 2017 "On Approval of Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Medical Care".

  • Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development No. 1687n dated December 27, 2011 "On Medical Criteria of Birth, Form of the Birth Document and Procedure for its Issuance" (registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on March 15, 2012, No. 23490).

  • Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 1130n dated October 20, 2020, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care in the Profile of 'Obstetrics and Gynecology'" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of Russia on November 12, 2020, No. 60869)

  • Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 804n dated October 13, 2017 (as amended on April 16, 2019) "On Approval of the Nomenclature of Medical Services"

  • ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan, 2022

  • ISUOG Practice Guidelines: performance of third-trimester obstetric ultrasound scan, 2024

  • ISUOG Basic Training Assessing the Placenta & Amniotic Fluid in Singleton & Twin Pregnancies

  • SMFM Consult Series #46: Evaluation and management of polyhydramnios, 2018

  • ROAG Clinical Guidelines «Preterm labor», 2024

Appendix A3.1. Assessment of amniotic fluid volume (1).

AFI may be preferable when evaluating polyhydramnios, whereas SDP may be more accurate when evaluating oligohydramnios.

Amniotic fluid volume should be assessed either subjectively, described as "normal" or "abnormal" (decreased or increased), or semi-quantitatively by measuring SDP or AFI.

To assess SDP, the deepest vertical pocket of amniotic fluid free of fetal parts and umbilical cord loops is measured.

It would be good to insert an image here from our ultrasound archive with arrows and pointers

SDP ≤ 2 cm or AFI ≤ 5 cm is evaluated as decreased amniotic fluid volume (oligohydramnios), SDP > 2 cm and < 8 cm as normal amniotic fluid volume, and SDP ≥ 8 cm or AFI ≥ 25 cm as increased amniotic fluid volume (polyhydramnios).

Detailed ultrasound examination in severe polyhydramnios should include the following parameters (18):

- fetometry

- fetal echocardiography

- assessment of fetal motor activity to evaluate neurological status

- assessment of fetal hand and foot positioning to rule out arthrogryposis[1]

- assessment of the presence and size of the fetal stomach to rule out tracheoesophageal fistula or esophageal atresia

- assessment of fetal facial and palatal anatomy

- assessment of fetal neck position and anatomy to rule out mass lesions

- assessment of fetal kidneys to evaluate pelviureteric junction obstruction

- assessment of the lower spine and pelvic region to confirm/rule out sacrococcygeal teratoma

- detection/exclusion of signs of fetal hydrops

- examination of the placental bed for the presence/absence of large chorioangiomas

- Doppler assessment of fetal MCA-PSV to detect/rule out anemia

Example 1: clinical case of severe polyhydramnios due to duodenal obstruction in the fetus in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy.

SDP 10.7 cm. AFI 37.7 cm.

 

Appendix A3. Reference materials — Anomalies of amniotic fluid volume (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios)

Appendix A3. Reference materials — Anomalies of amniotic fluid volume (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios)

Detailed ultrasound examination in oligohydramnios should include the following parameters (8):

- fetometry to detect fetal growth restriction[2]

- Doppler ultrasound

- assessment of the placenta

- assessment of the umbilical cord insertion site and the number of umbilical cord vessels

- assessment of fetal ultrasound anatomy to rule out congenital malformations, specifically:

- Kidneys (presence, size, position, appearance (echogenicity, cysts, urinary tract dilation))

- Urinary bladder (size and shape)

- assessment of fetal sex (posterior urethral valves are found exclusively in male fetuses, who also have a higher incidence of renal dysplasia and agenesis)

- Second-trimester markers indicating aneuploidy (echogenic intracardiac focus, choroid plexus cysts, single umbilical artery, urinary tract dilation, shortening of the humerus and femur bones, echogenic bowel, increased nuchal fold, hypoplasia or absence of the nasal bone (100).

Example 2: clinical case of oligohydramnios in the 2nd trimester of pregnancy with early severe fetal growth restriction and ultrasound markers of chromosomal abnormalities: echogenic foci in the cardiac ventricles, echogenic bowel

Only two free pockets of amniotic fluid are identified

SDP 1.9 cm. AFI 3.8 cm.

Appendix A3. Reference materials — Anomalies of amniotic fluid volume (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios)

Appendix A3. Reference materials — Anomalies of amniotic fluid volume (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios)

Appendix A3. Reference materials — Anomalies of amniotic fluid volume (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios)

[1] Arthrogryposis is a severe congenital musculoskeletal disorder characterized by contractures of two or more joints of the lower and/or upper extremities, typically associated with muscle hypoplasia or atrophy (2020, Current Pediatrics, Distal arthrogryposis in a newborn: a clinical case).

[2] ROAG Clinical Guidelines «Insufficient fetal growth requiring maternal medical care (fetal growth restriction)»

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix B. Algorithms of physician actions — Anomalies of amniotic fluid volume (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios)

Appendix B. Algorithms of physician actions — Anomalies of amniotic fluid volume (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios)

Appendix C. Patient Information

Amniotic fluid (AF) is the fluid that surrounds the fetus in the uterus. Initially, it consists mainly of water with electrolytes. However, as pregnancy progresses, it contains more molecules (including proteins, carbohydrates, lipids, and urea). During the first trimester of pregnancy, the main component of amniotic fluid is fluid transferred from the mother across the placenta (plasma, nutrients, and growth factors). In the second half of pregnancy, the baby is the primary source and produces AF independently through urination. As the baby develops and produces more urine, the AF volume peaks at approximately 32–34 weeks of gestation. After 36 weeks of gestation, i.e., almost at term, the volume naturally decreases.

Amniotic fluid (AF) supports a vast number of functions aimed at protecting and ensuring the normal development of the fetus. Amniotic fluid allows the baby to move freely, thereby contributing to the development of the musculoskeletal system (muscles and bones); prevents umbilical cord compression, thereby facilitating the normal supply of nutrition and oxygen from the mother; keeps the baby warm and maintains a constant temperature and humidity. Swallowing AF helps the fetus develop its gastrointestinal tract; the fetus also inhales and exhales the fluid, which stimulates lung development; and it acts as a barrier against intrauterine infection. AF contains fetal cells, and its analysis allows for the diagnosis of genetic abnormalities (a procedure known as amniocentesis).

What are polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios?

Polyhydramnios means the presence of an excessive amount of AF or amniotic fluid in the amniotic sac. This is a fairly common condition affecting about 1–4% of all pregnancies. It occurs in the 2nd and 3rd trimesters and is associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. It is usually diagnosed incidentally during a routine ultrasound during pregnancy (most often during the 2nd or 3rd trimester screenings).

Oligohydramnios means that, relative to gestational age, the level of AF surrounding the fetus (baby) is low.

How can one tell/find out if there is polyhydramnios or oligohydramnios?

Using ultrasound, doctors can reliably assess the volume of AF by calculating the amniotic fluid index (using the "four-quadrant method" – the uterus is divided into four imaginary quadrants, and the resulting measurements (the vertical length of each fluid pocket) are summed up) or by measuring the deepest vertical pocket. As a rule, an AF index of less than 5–6 cm is considered below normal. Oligohydramnios also includes cases where the maximum vertical pocket is less than 2 cm. If the vertical pocket is greater than 8 cm and the index is greater than 20 cm, this is defined as polyhydramnios.

What can cause polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios?

The causes of polyhydramnios are numerous and varied, most commonly associated with: gestational diabetes mellitus, fetal hydrops, congenital malformations or genetic abnormalities of the fetus (mainly trisomy 21, 18, and 13), rhesus isoimmunization, infections (toxoplasmosis, CMV, rubella, parvovirus, syphilis), maternal metabolic disorders (such as hypercalcemia), and other rare fetal or maternal conditions (such as Bartter syndrome, etc.). In a large percentage of cases, the cause of polyhydramnios cannot be identified, in which case it is called idiopathic.

The leading cause of oligohydramnios is rupture of membranes, but renal dysfunction or urinary tract obstruction can also be the source of the problem. Oligohydramnios may be a sign of placental dysfunction; very rarely (less than 1% of cases), the cause may be idiopathic (unknown).

What is the prognosis for polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios?

The prognosis for mild idiopathic polyhydramnios is generally favorable. When the cause of polyhydramnios is identified, the prognosis largely depends on the underlying cause and the degree of severity.

Since amniotic fluid is the baby's life support system, oligohydramnios is a serious condition, as all vital functions and protective actions of the amniotic fluid are diminished. There are several complications arising from oligohydramnios, which vary depending on its cause and severity, as well as the time of onset. The earlier in pregnancy oligohydramnios occurs, the worse the prognosis resulting from the underlying cause. Isolated idiopathic oligohydramnios in the third trimester usually has a good prognosis. Some of the risks associated with oligohydramnios include infectious complications (rupture of membranes), preterm birth (rupture of membranes, fetal growth restriction), and malpresentation (due to restricted movement).

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

No.

If you practice in the specialty of obstetrics and gynecology

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines directly in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer based on the guideline "Anomalies of amniotic fluid volume (polyhydramnios)" and other current Ministry of Health clinical guidelines with a reference to the section, rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines