Living Kidney Donation: Clinical Guidelines

Applies toadults2026 editionZ52.4

Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, Adults. Edition 2026, ICD-10 codes: Z52.4.

Receive research articles on "Living Kidney Donation"Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in Russian, with figures, sample sizes, and conclusions. Plus updates to Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary of the guideline text, 2026 edition. Each point links to the original section — verify with it before prescribing.

Living kidney donation is a medical technology for procuring a kidney from a virtually healthy living related donor for transplantation to a patient with stage 5 CKD. The guideline covers donor selection and evaluation, risk assessment, nephrectomy, perioperative prophylaxis, and follow-up care.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. An initial general practitioner visit is recommended to identify health abnormalities (LRE C, LE 4). If signs of legal incapacity are detected during the general practitioner's examination, a psychiatric evaluation is required (LRE C, LE 4). → in text
  2. A surgical examination is performed to rule out surgical pathology, account for past surgeries, and plan the nephrectomy (LRE C, LE 4). Additionally, consultations are performed with a urologist, cardiologist, endocrinologist, dentist, ophthalmologist, otolaryngologist, and obstetrician-gynecologist for women; nutritional status is assessed separately (LRE B, LE 2 for nutritional status assessment). → in text
  3. Complete blood count, blood chemistry, electrolytes and acid-base balance, coagulogram, TSH, and AB0 blood group and Rh factor determination are performed. Estimated GFR is assessed using creatinine standardized to the international reference standard and/or cystatin C (LRE C, LE 5). → in text
  4. Urinalysis is performed, including at least two routine urinalyses, Nechiporenko test, 24-hour proteinuria, and urine culture; evaluation of routine urinalysis and 24-hour proteinuria has LRE B, LE 3. → in text
  5. For immunological matching, class I and II HLA antigens are determined in the donor and recipient, and a crossmatch test of recipient antibodies against donor antigens is performed. If there are multiple medically eligible relatives, the donor with a compatible AB0 blood group and the highest HLA match is selected (LRE C, LE 4). → in text
  6. Instrumental examination includes abdominal and renal ultrasound, vascular examination, chest radiography, ECG, echocardiography, and contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and retroperitoneal space with intravenous bolus injection to assess vascular anatomy, anomalies, neoplasms, and nephrolithiasis (CT: LRE B, LE 3). → in text
  7. If the kidneys differ in size by more than 2 cm, dynamic scintigraphy with functional tests is performed to compare their function (LRE B, LE 3). → in text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

Who can become a living related kidney donor?

An individual aged 18 years or older who is in a blood (i.e., genetic) relationship with the recipient, has undergone a complete evaluation, and has been deemed fit for nephrectomy. Voluntary written informed consent is required. → in text

Is advanced age a contraindication to donation?

No, advanced age per se is not considered an absolute contraindication. However, in older individuals, especially those over 60, the evaluation must be more thorough due to the increased risk of perioperative complications. → in text

What type of nephrectomy is preferred in a living donor?

The primary approach is laparoscopic or hand-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. Open nephrectomy is performed in centers with limited laparoscopy experience. → in text

When can the donor return to normal activities?

For most donors, returning to normal daily activities takes 2–4 weeks. Thereafter, a healthy lifestyle and prevention of conditions that may cause CKD are required. → in text

How does kidney donation affect future pregnancy?

Women of reproductive age planning children and wishing to become living donors are informed about the potential increase in the likelihood of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia (LRE C, LE 4). → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
760, edition 2 (ID 760_2)
Publication date
July 29, 2026
Age category
adults
ICD-10 codes
Z52.4
Developers
Regional Public Organization "Society of Specialists
Official text
Rubricator of the Russian Ministry of Health — 760_2

List of Abbreviations

Hb – hemoglobin

HBV — hepatitis B virus

HCV – hepatitis C virus

HLA – human leukocyte antigen, human major histocompatibility complex

IgG – immunoglobulin G

IgM – immunoglobulin M

BP – blood pressure

ALT – alanine aminotransferase

AST – aspartate aminotransferase

aPTT – activated partial thromboplastin time

HIV – human immunodeficiency virus

WHO – World Health Organization

GGT – gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase

DNA – deoxyribonucleic acid

RRT – renal replacement therapy

BMI – body mass index

CT – computed tomography

LN — laparoscopic nephrectomy

NMU — nomenclature of medical services

PSA – prostate-specific antigen

PCR – polymerase chain reaction

GFR – glomerular filtration rate

ESRD – end-stage renal disease

US – ultrasound examination

CKD – chronic kidney disease

CRF – chronic renal failure

CMV — cytomegalovirus

EBV — Epstein-Barr virus

ECG – electrocardiography

EchoCG – echocardiography

Terms and Definitions

Living (related) donor — an individual aged 18 years or older, legally competent, who has given consent to provide and/or has provided during their lifetime their donor organ or part of an organ for transplantation purposes.

Allograft — a donor organ obtained from a human who is not an identical twin to the recipient, which has been transferred into the recipient's body via surgical operation.

Potential kidney recipient — a patient with stage 5 chronic kidney disease who has no contraindications to kidney transplantation and is included in the waiting list.

Living kidney donation is a medical technology that includes examination, decision-making regarding feasibility, surgical intervention, subsequent treatment, and rehabilitation aimed at obtaining a functionally and anatomically suitable kidney from a living donor and its subsequent transplantation to another person with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Kidney transplant recipient is a patient who has undergone kidney transplantation and is undergoing a comprehensive set of therapeutic measures aimed at preventing renal graft dysfunction caused by such pathological processes as rejection, recurrent pathology, infectious complications, nephrotoxic drug effects, and others.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is a pathological condition characterized by a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of less than 15 ml/min/1.73 m2, which corresponds to stage 5 CKD.

Kidney transplantation is a medical technology aimed at replacing irreversibly lost renal function, which includes surgical intervention as an essential stage consisting of moving a kidney obtained from another person (donor) into the recipient's body with the restoration of blood supply and urine outflow (Medical Service Nomenclature: "Kidney transplantation").

Chronic kidney disease is kidney damage or a decrease in their function for 3 months or more due to various etiological factors, the anatomical basis of which is the replacement of normal anatomical structures with fibrosis, leading to their dysfunction. The disease is classified into 5 stages, which differ in patient management tactics and the risk of developing end-stage renal disease and cardiovascular complications.

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

These guidelines describe the technologies for obtaining an anatomically and functionally sound donor organ (kidney) from a living related donor for subsequent transplantation, involving a comprehensive medical examination, establishing the feasibility of kidney retrieval, nephrectomy, subsequent treatment, clinical stabilization, and rehabilitation. The overarching goal is to provide information on the safest possible procedure for harvesting a kidney from a living donor. In the Russian Federation, a living donor can only be a close relative. According to the legislation of the Russian Federation, a genetic relationship between the recipient and the donor is a mandatory condition for organ transplantation from a living person [1]. According to the Russian Transplant Society registry, about 200 living-related kidney transplants are performed annually in the country [2].

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

Living kidney donation is an iatrogenic condition resulting from the implementation of medical technology that includes examination, decision-making regarding feasibility, surgical intervention, subsequent treatment, and rehabilitation aimed at obtaining a functionally and anatomically suitable kidney from a living donor and its subsequent transplantation to another person with stage 5 chronic kidney disease. Removal of one of the paired organs reduces the mass of functioning nephrons, resulting in a decrease in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but should preclude the development of CKD.

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

According to the annual report of the world's leading provider of products and services for patients with chronic renal failure, more than 4.1 million patients with this condition worldwide regularly undergo dialysis [3], and by 2030 this number is estimated to increase to 5.4 million. In 2020, kidney transplantation was performed in 93 countries, with a total of 81,005 operations performed (10.4 operations per 1 million population) [4].

In 2024, a total of 73,483 patients with stage 5 CKD were on renal replacement therapy in Russia, of whom 56,324 (76.7%) patients received treatment with hemodialysis, 1,997 (2.7%) with peritoneal dialysis, and 15,162 (20.6%) patients were followed up with a functioning renal transplant [5]. The prevalence rate of renal replacement therapy in the Russian Federation in 2024 was 503.2 patients per 1 million population, including 385.7 for hemodialysis, 13.7 for peritoneal dialysis, and 103.8 for renal transplant [5]. The Russian Federation continues to see an increase in the number of patients on dialysis and the associated financial costs for the national healthcare system [6].

In 2024, a total of 1,943 kidney transplants were performed across 49 centers. Compared to 2023, the number of kidney transplants increased by 6.9% (+126). The number of deceased-donor kidney transplants in 2024 was 1,720. Living-related kidney transplants in 2024 were performed in 23 centers (46.9%), with a total of 223 procedures. Only 6 centers performed 7 or more operations per year: the V.I. Shumakov National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs of the Russian Ministry of Health (106) and its branch (21), the Orenburg Regional Clinical Center of Surgery and Traumatology (15), the B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery (9), the State Novosibirsk Regional Clinical Hospital (9), and the National Medical Research Center for Children's Health of the Russian Ministry of Health (7). Meanwhile, the V.I. Shumakov NMRCTAO and its branch performed 56.9% of all living-related kidney transplants in the Russian Federation (127). The average utilization rate of living kidney donation in 2024 was 11.5% of the total number of kidney transplants (compared to 10.8% in 2023) [2].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

Z52.4 – Kidney donor.

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

Living related kidney donor.

ABO-compatible kidney donor / ABO-incompatible kidney donor.

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

Because a living kidney donor is a practically healthy individual, the condition is not pathological and has no clinical presentation prior to nephrectomy. The main objective of the evaluation process for potential donors is to assess donor suitability and minimize potential health risks to the donor. This includes identifying contraindications to donation and potential clinical (physical and psychosocial) risks. Donors must be over 18 years of age, have undergone a complete medical examination, and have given free and conscious written informed consent [7] to undergo nephrectomy. Informed consent for donation must be obtained from the candidate in the absence of the prospective recipient, family members, and other individuals who could influence the decision to donate [8]. Organ retrieval from a living donor is permissible only if, according to the conclusion of the medical commission of a medical organization involving relevant medical specialists and formalized as a protocol, no significant harm will be caused to their health [1, 9].

Potential living donors must be evaluated in accordance with Order No. 519n of the Russian Ministry of Health dated July 29, 2022, "On approval of the Procedure for conducting a medical examination of a donor who has given written informed voluntary consent to the retrieval of their organs and (or) tissues for transplantation" [10]. It is necessary to determine the list of routine screening tests and additional studies. Evaluations should be performed in a logical sequence to protect the potential donor from unnecessary, especially invasive, procedures prior to the appropriate stage of assessment.

Advanced age is not an absolute contraindication to donation, but the medical evaluation of elderly donors must be particularly thorough to identify relative or absolute contraindications to living donation. Both the donor and the recipient should be aware that an elderly donor may be at a higher risk of perioperative complications. This is particularly noticeable in donors over 60 years of age. Overall, utilizing kidneys from older donors appears to be an equivalent or beneficial alternative to waiting for deceased-donor kidneys [11]. It has been demonstrated that the GFR of a living related donor's kidney is an important determinant of long-term renal graft function [12, 13, 14].

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

Criteria for establishing a diagnosis are not applicable to a potential living related donor.

It is recommended that a potential living kidney donor undergo an initial clinical examination and consultation by a general practitioner (therapist) to identify any potential health abnormalities [8, 15, 16, 17, 18].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

It is recommended that potential donors undergo a psychiatric consultation if signs of legal incompetence are identified during the initial examination and consultation by a general practitioner (therapist) [7, 8, 15, 16, 17, 18].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

2.2 Physical Examination

It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by a surgeon for potential living kidney donors to rule out significant surgical pathology, identify previous surgical interventions, and plan radical nephrectomy (laparoscopic nephrectomy) [8,10,16,19,20,21,22].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

It is recommended that potential living kidney donors undergo an examination (consultation) by a dentist (general dentist), ophthalmologist, otolaryngologist, and obstetrician-gynecologist (for women) to identify any potential health abnormalities [8,10,16,20,21,22].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to assess the nutritional status of a potential living kidney donor to identify potential health abnormalities [8,15,22,23,24,25].

GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)

It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by a urologist for a potential living kidney donor to rule out urinary system disorders in women and urogenital system disorders in men [22,106,107,164].

Level of Recommendations CLevel of Evidence 3Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)

It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by an oncologist for female potential living kidney donors over the age of 40 [26-29,30].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by a cardiologist for a potential living kidney donor to rule out cardiovascular pathology and hypertension [8,17,31,32,33,34,105].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is not recommended to consider individuals taking two or more antihypertensive medications and those with uncontrolled arterial hypertension as potential living kidney donors [22,104].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform an initial examination (consultation) by an endocrinologist for a potential living kidney donor to rule out endocrine system pathology [18,122].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • To rule out carbohydrate metabolism disorders, it is recommended to perform an oral glucose tolerance test or measure glycated hemoglobin levels in blood for potential donors with an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: in the presence of a family history of diabetes mellitus, a history of gestational pyelonephritis, obesity, or elevated fasting blood glucose levels [8,27,35].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

Due to the fact that the main purpose of evaluating a potential living donor is to rule out occult acute or chronic diseases or pathological conditions that may serve as reasons for refusing living donation:

It is recommended to determine ABO blood groups and Rh factor (D antigen) for a potential living kidney donor to determine blood group compatibility/incompatibility between the donor and recipient [8,10,36,37,38,39,40,41,43,44].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (CBC) with differential for a potential living kidney donor for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of anemia [21,24,41,42,43,44,45, 46,117].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform a general clinical blood chemistry panel (including: determination of aspartate aminotransferase activity, alanine aminotransferase activity, gamma-glutamyl transferase activity, amylase activity, alkaline phosphatase activity, serum iron level, C-reactive protein level, total protein level, albumin level, urea level, uric acid level, creatinine level, total bilirubin level, conjugated (direct) bilirubin level, free (indirect) bilirubin level, blood glucose level, cholesterol level, total calcium level, inorganic phosphorus level, glycated hemoglobin level, and lipid metabolism panel) for a potential living kidney donor to diagnose metabolic disorders [8,10,21,27,35,43,44,47,48,49].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to measure blood sodium, potassium, and chloride levels, as well as acid-base balance and blood gases, for a potential living kidney donor to diagnose electrolyte disorders [21,27,43,44,47].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform a coagulogram (screening hemostasis test) (including fibrinogen level, antithrombin-III activity, plasminogen level, prothrombin index, and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)) for a potential living kidney donor to diagnose blood coagulation disorders [21,27,43,44,47,48].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to test for blood levels of CA 19-9 tumor marker, CA 242 tumor-associated marker, CA 72-4 tumor marker, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), CA 125 tumor marker (for women), total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (for men over 45 years old), and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (for men over 45 years old) to rule out oncological pathology [10,27,28,30].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to measure thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) in the blood of all potential donors to rule out thyroid diseases [10,22].

LoE C (LoD – 5)

It is recommended to conduct an initial evaluation of potential kidney donors using estimated GFR expressed in mL/min/1.73 m2, calculated from blood creatinine levels standardized to the international reference standard (nephron function testing via creatinine clearance) / blood cystatin C levels, to rule out impaired renal filtration function [8,13,20,27,50-58,117,120,121].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform a urinalysis for a potential living kidney donor to diagnose renal dysfunction [8,10,21,47,59-63,121].

GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)

It is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) urine test for bacterial pathogens using automated plating for all potential kidney donors to rule out urinary tract infections [10,22].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to determine 24-hour urine protein excretion in potential living kidney donors to detect proteinuria [10,21,48,59,60,64].

GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)

It is recommended to perform at least two urinalyses in potential living kidney donors to detect microhematuria [8,65-71].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform a urinalysis using the Nechiporenko method for all potential kidney donors to assess the level of hematuria and leukocyturia [10,22].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform qualitative PCR testing for Hepatitis B virus DNA in blood, qualitative PCR testing for Hepatitis C virus RNA in blood, molecular biology testing of blood for human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1), molecular biology testing of blood for cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus), molecular biology testing of blood for Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein - Barr virus), detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) (Hepatitis B virus) in blood, detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C virus) in blood, detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV 1) in blood, detection of IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV 2) in blood, and nontreponemal tests for antibodies to Treponema pallidum (RPR, VDRL) (qualitative and semi-quantitative test) in blood serum of potential kidney recipients to prevent the transmission of infectious diseases that pose a threat to the life and health of the recipient [10,18,72-80].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to determine class I and II HLA antigens (genes) for the recipient and donor, and perform a crossmatch test for recipient immune antibodies against the donor's major histocompatibility complex antigens. If there are multiple potential living donors with no medical contraindications for donor nephrectomy, it is recommended to consider a relative with a compatible blood group (AB0) and the highest human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match as the living donor, which creates optimal conditions for a successful transplantation [8,81-89].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

It is recommended to perform a comprehensive ultrasound examination of the abdominal organs, kidney ultrasound, duplex scanning of the abdominal aorta, iliac and common femoral arteries, comprehensive pelvic ultrasound for women (transvaginal and transabdominal), and prostate ultrasound (for men over 45 years of age) in a potential living related kidney donor to rule out pathology of the abdominal cavity, retroperitoneal space, pelvic organs, visible renal pathology (agenesis, dystopia), and nephrolithiasis [8,10,17,27,28].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform duplex scanning of the renal arteries and duplex scanning of the lower extremity vessels (arteries and veins) in a potential living related kidney donor to rule out critical stenoses and floating thrombi in the vessels [8,10,21].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform targeted chest X-ray in a potential living related kidney donor to rule out thoracic pathology [10,21,35].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram (ECG) with interpretation and description of data in a potential living related kidney donor to identify existing foci of ischemia or cardiomyopathy [8,10,17,90,91,125].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform echocardiography (EchoCG) and, if indications are identified (anamnestic, clinical, laboratory, or instrumental), Holter ECG monitoring and an exercise stress test using an ergometer in a potential living related kidney donor to determine cardiac functional reserve [8,10,17,92,93].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform coronary angiography to assess the coronary bed in a potential living kidney donor with signs of myocardial ischemia [8,10,17,92,93].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended, in the presence of signs of arterial hypertension, to perform 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to determine the severity and nature of arterial hypertension [8,10,17,31-34].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform duplex scanning of the extracranial segments of brachiocephalic arteries in a potential living kidney donor to rule out stenotic lesions [8,10,17].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy in a potential living kidney donor [8,10,17] to rule out diseases of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum.

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform spirometry (unforced respiratory volumes and flows) in a potential living kidney donor to rule out obstructive pulmonary diseases [8,10,17].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform an ultrasound examination of the thyroid and parathyroid glands in a potential living kidney donor to rule out structural disorders [8,10,17].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform computed tomography of the abdomen and retroperitoneal space with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement in a potential living related kidney donor to determine renal vascular anatomy, anomalies, renal neoplasms, and nephrolithiasis [8,10,17,21,94-99].

GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3)

It is recommended to perform dynamic renal scintigraphy with functional tests if the difference in kidney size exceeds 2 cm in a potential living related kidney donor to detect significant functional differences between the two kidneys [100-103].

GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)

2.5 Other Procedures

Additional examinations are performed if pathological conditions are identified during the evaluation according to the current clinical guidelines for the respective nosology.

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

3.1 Preoperative Preparation

It is recommended to administer antithrombotic agents and apply lower extremity compression stockings in a potential living related kidney donor to prevent thrombosis in accordance with general principles of thromboembolic complication prophylaxis [108-112].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to administer a single intravenous dose of a systemic antibacterial drug 1 hour before the skin incision in a living related kidney donor as perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis [113-118].

Level of Recommendations CLevel of Evidence 3Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)

It is recommended to provide preoperative hydration with electrolyte solutions for 2–4 hours before surgery and/or as a bolus during surgery in a living related kidney donor to improve hemodynamic stability during the surgical intervention [119-121,165].

GCR BLoE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1)

3.2 Surgical Treatment

It is recommended to use laparoscopic or hand-assisted transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy in a living donor to obtain a donor kidney suitable for transplantation [122-135].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 1)

  • In centers where experience with laparoscopic renal surgery is limited, it is recommended to perform open nephrectomy in a living related donor to obtain a donor kidney suitable for transplantation [123,125,126,127,129].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 1)

It is recommended to make an individualized decision on using a kidney from a living related donor during the preoperative evaluation of the donor and recipient in the presence of multiple renal arteries or anatomical anomalies to increase safety for living donors and improve transplant outcomes in recipients [8,122,127,136-138,146].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

It is recommended for a potential living kidney donor to choose the kidney with a single renal artery for transplantation, provided the functions of both kidneys are comparable, in order to minimize the risk of vascular complications during vascular anastomosis creation. This statement also applies to renal veins [8,17,136-138].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

4.1 General Issues of Rehabilitation After Kidney Donation

Following kidney donation, most individuals can return to normal daily activities within two to four weeks. Follow-up after kidney donation should focus on monitoring and maintaining general and renal health, including maintaining a healthy lifestyle (e.g., diet, weight maintenance, regular aerobic exercise), preventing potentially nephrotoxic exposures (e.g., tobacco use, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, nephrotoxic medications), preventing conditions that can cause chronic kidney disease (e.g., hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease), and timely treatment of such conditions if they develop after kidney donation. Hypertension is diagnosed more frequently in kidney donors than in individuals with comparable baseline health status, although this may partly reflect closer monitoring and earlier detection [8,139-141].

Early detection and treatment of conditions that potentially affect the decline in GFR can protect the donor from further deterioration of renal function or other health decline. Promotion of a healthy lifestyle should be carried out, including regular exercise, a healthy diet, and smoking cessation [8].

4.2 Reproductive Health in Kidney Donors

It is recommended to inform women of reproductive age planning children and expressing the desire to become a living donor that living kidney donation may affect future pregnancies, including a potentially higher probability of being diagnosed with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia [142-145].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

  • During the evaluation and preoperative preparation, it is recommended to inform potential kidney donors that the overall risk of developing chronic kidney disease may increase following kidney donation [147-154].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (erythrocytes, platelets, leukocytes, total hemoglobin), general urinalysis, general clinical blood chemistry (total protein, albumin, creatinine, urea, ALT, AST activities), coagulation profile (fibrinogen, antithrombin-III, plasminogen, prothrombin index, APTT), as well as a physical and instrumental examination (ultrasound of the retroperitoneal space) in a living related donor in the early postoperative period (days 1–5) to detect any possible health abnormalities [8,17,155,156].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to have an annual follow-up visit (examination, consultation) with a general practitioner/internist for a living related kidney donor at their place of residence to detect any possible health abnormalities [155,156].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

It is recommended to inform women of reproductive age planning children who are living kidney donors about the potentially increased risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension following kidney donation, which may require specialized prenatal care [142-145,157,158].

GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)

6. Organization of Medical Care

The evaluation of a potential living donor is organized after obtaining informed consent in the prescribed manner [10]. Hospitalization of potential kidney donors is scheduled electively after clinical evaluation, a decision on surgery made by all members of the multidisciplinary team, or if inpatient further evaluation is required. The conditions for the surgery are: a genetic relationship with the recipient; availability of medical commission protocols from the medical organization confirming the necessity of kidney transplantation for the recipient and the feasibility of nephrectomy in the potential donor, indicating that no significant harm will be caused to their health [1,7,9].

Indications for elective hospitalization:

 the potential donor's desire expressed in the form of voluntary informed consent for evaluation as a living kidney donor, in the prescribed form.

Indications for discharging the patient from the hospital:

 absence of early postoperative complications that could affect the patient's health;

 satisfactory function of the remaining kidney;

 satisfactory psychoemotional status of the kidney donor;

 availability of clear recommendations in the epicrisis for further patient follow-up.

7. Additional Information

7.1 Intraoperative Complications and Complications of the Early Postoperative Period

Nephrectomy in living donors, like any other intervention, is associated with potential complications and risks. However, the fact that the surgery is performed on a healthy patient heightens the significance of any complications. The list of potential complications must be included in the informed consent for surgery. According to official data, operative mortality ranges from 0.01% to 0.03%, regardless of surgical technique or donor status. A recent systematic review of complications in minimally invasive laparoscopic nephrectomy (190 studies) and meta-analysis (41 studies) described 32,308 laparoscopic nephrectomies. The rate of intraoperative complications among them was 2.2% (the most frequent complications being hemorrhage [1.5% of cases] and adjacent organ injury [0.8% of cases]), while postoperative complications occurred in 7% (infectious complications in 2.6% of cases, and hemorrhage in 1% of cases). The conversion rate was 1.1%, in half of the cases due to hemorrhage and in the other half due to adjacent organ injury. The reexploration rate was 0.6%, in the majority of cases for hemostasis or hematoma evacuation [152,159,160].

7.2 Complications in the Long-Term Postoperative Period

Long-term complications are most commonly related to the remaining kidney. Renal function declines immediately after nephrectomy and then improves over several years. However, in the long-term postoperative period, there are signs of functional reserve depletion [161,162]. Despite a persistent increase in the incidence of proteinuria and arterial hypertension, the incidence of stage 5 chronic kidney disease (0.4-1.1%) does not differ from the general population [151,163]. The risk of donor mortality in the long-term postoperative period does not differ from that of the general population of corresponding age with similar comorbidities [151,152].

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

No.

Quality criteria

Performance assessment (yes/no)

1

Initial general practitioner examination (inspection, consultation) was performed

Yes/no

2

Initial surgical consultation and examination performed

Yes/no

3

Initial urological consultation and examination performed (including total blood PSA level testing and prostate ultrasound for men over 45 years of age)

Yes/no

4

Initial oncological consultation and examination performed for women over 40 years of age

Yes/no

5

Initial cardiological consultation and examination performed

Yes/no

6

Initial endocrinologist consultation (examination, assessment) performed

Yes/no

7

Determination of ABO blood groups and Rhesus antigen D (Rh factor) performed

Yes/no

8

A complete blood count (differential) was performed

Yes/no

9

General general-clinical biochemical blood test performed (including: determination of blood aspartate aminotransferase activity, determination of blood alanine aminotransferase activity, determination of blood gamma-glutamyl transferase activity, determination of blood amylase activity, determination of blood alkaline phosphatase activity, serum iron testing, serum C-reactive protein testing, total blood protein testing, blood albumin testing, blood urea testing, blood uric acid testing, blood creatinine testing, total blood bilirubin testing, conjugated [direct] blood bilirubin testing, free [indirect] blood bilirubin testing, blood glucose testing, blood cholesterol testing, total blood calcium testing, inorganic phosphorus testing, glycated hemoglobin testing) and lipid metabolism biochemical blood test

Yes/no

10

Blood sodium test, blood potassium test, blood chloride test, blood acid-base balance and blood gas analysis performed

Yes/no

11

GFR calculated

Yes/no

12

Coagulation panel performed (screening hemostasis test) (blood fibrinogen level, blood antithrombin-III activity, blood plasminogen level, prothrombin index, APTT)

Yes/no

13

Urinalysis (general clinical urine test) performed

Yes/no

14

24-hour urine protein quantification performed

Yes/no

15

Nechyporenko urine test performed

Yes/no

16

Qualitative PCR test for hepatitis B virus (Hepatitis B virus) DNA in blood, qualitative PCR test for hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C virus) RNA in blood, molecular biological blood test for human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1); molecular biological blood test for cytomegalovirus (Cytomegalovirus), molecular biological blood test for Epstein-Barr virus (Epstein-Barr virus), blood test for hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) (Hepatitis B virus), blood test for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (Hepatitis C virus), blood test for IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV 1), blood test for IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV 2), and non-treponemal tests (RPR, VDRL) for antibodies to Treponema pallidum (qualitative and semi-quantitative test) in blood serum

Yes/no

17

Immunological workup performed: determination of class I and II HLA antigens (genes); recipient immune crossmatch against donor major histocompatibility complex antigens

Yes/no

18

Abdominal ultrasound (comprehensive) was performed.

Yes/no

19

Targeted chest X-ray performed

Yes/no

20

ECG recording was performed

Yes/no

21

Echocardiography, Holter heart rhythm monitoring, and an ergometer exercise stress test performed

Yes/no

22

Computed tomography of the abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement performed

Yes/no

23

Elastic compression of the lower extremities used

Yes/no

25

Systemic antibacterial drugs administered 1 hour prior to skin incision

Yes/no

26

Urinalysis (general clinical urine test), complete blood count (red blood cells, platelets, leukocytes, total blood hemoglobin), general biochemical blood test (total protein, albumin, creatinine, urea, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase activity), coagulation panel (screening hemostasis test) (blood fibrinogen level, blood antithrombin-III activity, blood plasminogen level, prothrombin index, APTT), physical examination and instrumental diagnostics (ultrasound of the retroperitoneal space) performed in the early postoperative period (days 1–5)

Yes/no

References

Show references
  1. Federal Law No. 323-FZ dated November 21, 2011, "On the Fundamentals of Protecting Citizens' Health in the Russian Federation." Article 47. Donation of human organs and tissues and their transplantation.

  2. Gautier S.V., Khomyakov S.M. Organ donation and transplantation in the Russian Federation in 2024. 17th Report of the Russian Transplant Society Registry. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2025;27(3):8-32. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2025-3-8-32

  3. https://www.fresenius.com/sites/default/files/2025-03/Fresenius_Annual_Report_2024.pdf

  4. http://www.transplant-observatory.org/summary/

  5. Gautier S.V., Khomyakov S.M., Tsirulnikova O.M., Chebotareva N.V., Kruglov D.N. Chronic kidney disease and renal replacement therapy in the Russian Federation in 2024. Annual monitoring by the Center for Excellence in Nephrological Care of the National Medical Research Center for Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after Academician V.I. Shumakov of the Russian Ministry of Health. Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. 2025;27(3):173-203. https://doi.org/10.15825/1995-1191-2025-3-173-203

  6. Kotenko ON, Omelyanovsky VV, Ignatyeva VI, Yagnenkova EE, Rumyantseva EI. The cost of chronic kidney disease in the Russian Federation. Clinical Nephrology. 2021; 4: 30–38. Kotenko ON, Omelyanovsky VV, Ignatyeva VI, Yagnenkova EE, Rumyantseva EI. The cost of chronic kidney disease in the Russian Federation. Clinical Nephrology. 2021; 4: 30–38. doi: 10.18565/nephrology.2021.4.30-38.

  7. Federal Law No. 4180-I of December 22, 1992, "On Transplantation of Human Organs and/or Tissues". Article 11. Conditions for the removal of organs and/or tissues from a living donor.

  8. Lentine KL, Kasiske BL, Levey AS, Adams PL, Alberú J, Bakr MA, Gallon L, Garvey CA, Guleria S, Li PK, Segev DL, Taler SJ, Tanabe K, Wright L, Zeier MG, Cheung M, Garg AX. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors. Transplantation. 2017 Aug;101(8S Suppl 1):S1-S109. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001769. PMID: 28742762; PMCID: PMC5540357.

  9. Federal Law No. 4180-I of December 22, 1992, "On Transplantation of Human Organs and/or Tissues". Article 1. Conditions and procedure for the transplantation of human organs and/or tissues.

  10. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 519n of July 29, 2022, "On Approval of the Procedure for Medical Examination of a Donor Who Has Given Written Informed Voluntary Consent to the Removal of His/Her Organs and/or Tissues for Transplantation".

  11. Englum BR, Schechter MA, Irish WD, Ravindra KV, Vikraman DS, Sanoff SL, Ellis MJ, Sudan DL, Patel UD. Outcomes in kidney transplant recipients from older living donors. Transplantation. 2015 Feb;99(2):309-15. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000607. PMID: 25594554.

  12. Øien CM, Reisaeter AV, Leivestad T, Dekker FW, Line PD, Os I. Living donor kidney transplantation: the effects of donor age and gender on short- and long-term outcomes. Transplantation. 2007 Mar 15;83(5):600-6. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000255583.34329.dd. PMID: 17353781.

  13. Cohney S, Kanellis J, Howell M; CARI. The CARI guidelines. Donor renal function. Nephrology (Carlton). 2010 Apr;15 Suppl 1:S137-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2009.01223.x. PMID: 20591026.

  14. Hawley CM, Kearsley J, Campbell SB, Mudge DW, Isbel NM, Johnson DW, May K, Preston J, Griffin A, Wall D, Burke J, McTaggart SJ, Frohloff G, Nicol D. Estimated donor glomerular filtration rate is the most important donor characteristic predicting graft function in recipients of kidneys from live donors. Transpl Int. 2007 Jan;20(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00400.x. PMID: 17181655.

  15. Abramowicz D, Cochat P, Claas FH, Heemann U, Pascual J, Dudley C, Harden P, Hourmant M, Maggiore U, Salvadori M, Spasovski G, Squifflet JP, Steiger J, Torres A, Viklicky O, Zeier M, Vanholder R, Van Biesen W, Nagler E. European Renal Best Practice Guideline on kidney donor and recipient evaluation and perioperative care. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015 Nov;30(11):1790-7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu216. Epub 2014 Jul 9. PMID: 25007790.

  16. Grigorescu M, Kemmner S, Schönermarck U, Sajin I, Guenther W, Cerqueira TL, Illigens B, Siepmann T, Meiser B, Guba M, Fischereder M, Stang MJ. Disqualification of Donor and Recipient Candidates From the Living Kidney Donation Program: Experience of a Single-Center in Germany. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 10;9:904795. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.904795. Erratum in: Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 17;9:1004413. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1004413. PMID: 35755074; PMCID: PMC9226311.

  17. Danovitch GM. Handbook of Kidney Transplantation. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2013: 848.

  18. Federal Law No. 4180-I of December 22, 1992, "On Transplantation of Human Organs and/or Tissues". Article 3. Restriction of the circle of living donors.

  19. Tong A, Chapman JR, Wong G, Craig JC. Living kidney donor assessment: challenges, uncertainties and controversies among transplant nephrologists and surgeons. Am J Transplant. 2013 Nov;13(11):2912-23. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12411. Epub 2013 Sep 10. PMID: 24020905.

  20. Habbous S, Woo J, Lam NN, Lentine KL, Cooper M, Reich M, Garg AX. The Efficiency of Evaluating Candidates for Living Kidney Donation: A Scoping Review. Transplant Direct. 2018 Sep 20;4(10):e394. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000833. PMID: 30498771; PMCID: PMC6233672.

  21. Tong A, Chapman JR, Wong G, de Bruijn J, Craig JC. Screening and follow-up of living kidney donors: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines. Transplantation. 2011 Nov 15;92(9):962-72. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182328276. PMID: 21959214.

  22. Mandelbrot DA, Reese PP, Garg N, Thomas CP, Rodrigue JR, Schinstock C, Doshi M, Cooper M, Friedewald J, Naik AS, Kaul DR, Ison MG, Rocco MV, Verbesey J, Hladunewich MA, Ibrahim HN, Poggio ED. KDOQI US Commentary on the 2017 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020 Mar;75(3):299-316. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.10.005. Epub 2020 Jan 29. PMID: 32007233.

  23. Thiessen C, Gordon EJ, Reese PP, Kulkarni S. Development of a Donor-Centered Approach to Risk Assessment: Rebalancing Nonmaleficence and Autonomy. Am J Transplant. 2015 Sep;15(9):2314-23. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13272. Epub 2015 Apr 13. PMID: 25868787.

  24. Bellini MI, Nozdrin M, Pengel L, Knight S, Papalois V. Risks for donors associated with living kidney donation: meta-analysis. Br J Surg. 2022 Jul 15;109(8):671-678. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac114. PMID: 35612960; PMCID: PMC10364766.

  25. Locke JE, Reed RD, Massie AB, MacLennan PA, Sawinski D, Kumar V, Snyder JJ, Carter AJ, Shelton BA, Mustian MN, Lewis CE, Segev DL. Obesity and long-term mortality risk among living kidney donors. Surgery. 2019 Aug;166(2):205-208. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 May 7. PMID: 31072668; PMCID: PMC6660998.

  26. Delmonico F; Council of the Transplantation Society. A Report of the Amsterdam Forum On the Care of the Live Kidney Donor: Data and Medical Guidelines. Transplantation. 2005 Mar 27;79(6 Suppl):S53-66. PMID: 15785361.

  27. British Transplantation Society / Renal Association UK Guidelines for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation 2018. https://bts.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/FINAL_LDKT-guidelines_June-2018.pdf

  28. OPTN (Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network)/UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing). OPTN Policies, Policy 14: Living Donation. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/governance/policies/. (Accessed: June 28, 2017).

  29. Cancer Research UK: Cancer Incidence by Age: 2012-2014. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/incidence/age

  30. Kirchner, V.A., T Liu, P. & Pruett, T.L. Infection and Cancer Screening in Potential Living Donors: Best Practices to Protect the Donor and Recipient. Curr Transpl Rep 2, 35–43 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40472-014-0049-y

  31. O'Keeffe LM, Ramond A, Oliver-Williams C, Willeit P, Paige E, Trotter P, Evans J, Wadström J, Nicholson M, Collett D, Di Angelantonio E. Mid- and Long-Term Health Risks in Living Kidney Donors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):276-284. doi: 10.7326/M17-1235. Epub 2018 Jan 30. PMID: 29379948.

  32. Boudville N, Prasad GV, Knoll G, Muirhead N, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Yang RC, Rosas-Arellano MP, Housawi A, Garg AX; Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR) Network. Meta-analysis: risk for hypertension in living kidney donors. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 1;145(3):185-96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-3-200608010-00006. PMID: 16880460.

  33. Garg AX, Prasad GV, Thiessen-Philbrook HR, Ping L, Melo M, Gibney EM, Knoll G, Karpinski M, Parikh CR, Gill J, Storsley L, Vlasschaert M, Mamdani M; Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR) Network. Cardiovascular disease and hypertension risk in living kidney donors: an analysis of health administrative data in Ontario, Canada. Transplantation. 2008 Aug 15;86(3):399-406. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31817ba9e3. PMID: 18698242.

  34. Lentine KL, Schnitzler MA, Xiao H, Saab G, Salvalaggio PR, Axelrod D, Davis CL, Abbott KC, Brennan DC. Racial variation in medical outcomes among living kidney donors. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 19;363(8):724-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1000950. PMID: 20818874; PMCID: PMC3041966.

  35. Sawinski D, Locke JE. Evaluation of Kidney Donors: Core Curriculum 2018. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 May;71(5):737-747. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.10.018. Epub 2018 Jan 11. PMID: 29336856; PMCID: PMC6448769.

  36. Tydén G, Kumlien G, Berg UB. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in children. Pediatr Transplant. 2011 Aug;15(5):502-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2011.01480.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29. PMID: 21771231.

  37. Hourmant M, Figueres L, Gicquel A, Kimmel C, Garandeau C. New rules of ABO-compatibility in kidney transplantation. Transfus Clin Biol. 2019 Sep;26(3):180-183. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 12. PMID: 31235269.

  38. Kanter Berga J, Sancho Calabuig A, Gavela Martinez E, Puig Alcaraz N, Avila Bernabeu A, Crespo Albiach J, Molina Vila P, Beltrán Catalan S, Pallardó Mateu L. Desensitization Protocol in Recipients of Deceased Kidney Donor With Donor-Specific Antibody-Low Titers. Transplant Proc. 2016 Nov;48(9):2880-2883. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.07.050.

  39. Green H, Nesher E, Aizner S, Israeli M, Klein T, Zakai H, Rahamimov R, Rozen-Zvi B, Mor E. Long-term results of desensitization protocol with and without rituximab in sensitized kidney transplant recipients. Clin Transplant. 2019 Jun;33(6):e13562. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13562.

  40. Moisyuk YG, Sushkov AI. ABO-incompatible living-donor kidney transplantation: long-term outcomes. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2017;45(7):535-546. https://doi.org/10.18786/2072-0505-2017-45-7-535-546

  41. Joseph S. et al. Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice – evidence-based approach from the writing committee of the American Society for Apheresis: the 7th special issue. Journal of Clinical Apheresis 2016. 31:149-338

  42. Reese PP, Hoo AC, Magee CC. Screening for sickle trait among potential live kidney donors: policies and practices in US transplant centers. Transpl Int. 2008 Apr;21(4):328-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00611.x. Epub 2007 Dec 13. PMID: 18086286.

  43. Davis CL, Delmonico FL. Living-donor kidney transplantation: a review of the current practices for the live donor. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005 Jul;16(7):2098-110. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004100824. Epub 2005 Jun 1. PMID: 15930096.

  44. Kasiske BL, Bia MJ. The evaluation and selection of living kidney donors. Am J Kidney Dis. 1995 Aug;26(2):387-98. doi: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90664-9. PMID: 7645548.

  45. Cetin T, Oktenli C, Ozgurtas T, Yenicesu M, Sanisoglu SY, Oguz Y, Yildiz O, Kurt I, Musabak U, Bulucu F, Kocar IH. Renal tubular dysfunction in beta-thalassemia minor. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003 Dec;42(6):1164-8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2003.08.016. PMID: 14655187.

  46. Arian M, Oghazian MB, Nour El Dine MH, Valinejadi A, Badiee Z, Soleimani M, Sahebkar A. Biochemical Markers of Early Renal Dysfunction in Patients with β-thalassemia Major: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Curr Med Chem. 2025;32(13):2572-2597. doi: 10.2174/0109298673250805230922054406. PMID: 37921173.

  47. Grams ME, Sang Y, Levey AS, Matsushita K, Ballew S, Chang AR, Chow EK, Kasiske BL, Kovesdy CP, Nadkarni GN, Shalev V, Segev DL, Coresh J, Lentine KL, Garg AX; Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium. Kidney-Failure Risk Projection for the Living Kidney-Donor Candidate. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 4;374(5):411-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510491. Epub 2015 Nov 6. PMID: 26544982; PMCID: PMC4758367.

  48. Huang N, Foster MC, Lentine KL, Garg AX, Poggio ED, Kasiske BL, Inker LA, Levey AS. Estimated GFR for Living Kidney Donor Evaluation. Am J Transplant. 2016 Jan;16(1):171-80. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13540. Epub 2015 Nov 23. PMID: 26594819

  49. Type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: clinical guidelines (approved by the Russian Ministry of Health) / Russian Association of Endocrinologists. — 2022. — URL:https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/view-cr/290_2

  50. Soveri I, Berg UB, Björk J, et al. Measuring GFR: a systematic review. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;64:411–424

  51. Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J; CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration). A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009 May 5;150(9):604-12. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2011 Sep 20;155(6):408. PMID: 19414839; PMCID: PMC2763564..

  52. Lujan PR, Chiurchiu C, Douthat W, de Arteaga J, de la Fuente J, Capra RH, Massari PU. CKD-EPI instead of MDRD for candidates to kidney donation. Transplantation. 2012 Sep 27;94(6):637-41. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182603260. PMID: 22918217.

  53. Levey AS, Inker LA. GFR Evaluation in Living Kidney Donor Candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Apr;28(4):1062-1071. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2016070790. Epub 2017 Mar 15. PMID: 28298325; PMCID: PMC5373464.

  54. Fenton A, Montgomery E, Nightingale P, Peters AM, Sheerin N, Wroe AC, Lipkin GW. Glomerular filtration rate: new age- and gender- specific reference ranges and thresholds for living kidney donation. BMC Nephrol. 2018 Nov 22;19(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-1126-8. PMID: 30466393; PMCID: PMC6249883.

  55. Ibrahim HN, Foley R, Tan L, Rogers T, Bailey RF, Guo H, Gross CR, Matas AJ. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 29;360(5):459-69. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804883. PMID: 19179315; PMCID: PMC3559132

  56. Lam NN, Lentine KL, Garg AX. End-stage renal disease risk in live kidney donors: what have we learned from two recent studies? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2014 Nov;23(6):592-6. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000063. PMID: 25160076; PMCID: PMC4189686.

  57. Mjøen G, Hallan S, Hartmann A, Foss A, Midtvedt K, Øyen O, Reisæter A, Pfeffer P, Jenssen T, Leivestad T, Line PD, Øvrehus M, Dale DO, Pihlstrøm H, Holme I, Dekker FW, Holdaas H. Long-term risks for kidney donors. Kidney Int. 2014 Jul;86(1):162-7. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.460. Epub 2013 Nov 27. PMID: 24284516.

  58. Muzaale AD, Massie AB, Wang MC, Montgomery RA, McBride MA, Wainright JL, Segev DL. Risk of end-stage renal disease following live kidney donation. JAMA. 2014 Feb 12;311(6):579-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.285141. PMID: 24519297; PMCID: PMC4411956.

  59. Iseki K, Ikemiya Y, Iseki C, Takishita S. Proteinuria and the risk of developing end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2003 Apr;63(4):1468-74. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00868.x. PMID: 12631363.

  60. Halbesma N, Kuiken DS, Brantsma AH, Bakker SJ, Wetzels JF, De Zeeuw D, De Jong PE, Gansevoort RT. Macroalbuminuria is a better risk marker than low estimated GFR to identify individuals at risk for accelerated GFR loss in population screening. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Sep;17(9):2582-90. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005121352. Epub 2006 Aug 9. PMID: 16899519.

  61. Anjum S, Muzaale AD, Massie AB, Bae S, Luo X, Grams ME, Lentine KL, Garg AX, Segev DL. Patterns of End-Stage Renal Disease Caused by Diabetes, Hypertension, and Glomerulonephritis in Live Kidney Donors. Am J Transplant. 2016 Dec;16(12):3540-3547. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13917. Epub 2016 Jul 12. PMID: 27287605; PMCID: PMC6116527.

  62. Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008 Jun;36(5):309-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002. Erratum in: Am J Infect Control. 2008 Nov;36(9):655. PMID: 18538699.

  63. Wise GJ, Schlegel PN. Sterile pyuria. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1048-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1410052. PMID: 25760357.

  64. Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium; Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, Woodward M, Levey AS, de Jong PE, Coresh J, Gansevoort RT. Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010 Jun 12;375(9731):2073-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60674-5. Epub 2010 May 17. PMID: 20483451; PMCID: PMC3993088.

  65. Barocas DA, Lotan Y, Matulewicz RS, Raman JD, Westerman ME, Kirkby E, Pak L, Souter L. Updates to Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline (2025). J Urol. 0(0). doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004490. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/abs/10.1097/JU.0000000000004490

  66. Vivante A, Afek A, Frenkel-Nir Y, Tzur D, Farfel A, Golan E, Chaiter Y, Shohat T, Skorecki K, Calderon-Margalit R. Persistent asymptomatic isolated microscopic hematuria in Israeli adolescents and young adults and risk for end-stage renal disease. JAMA. 2011 Aug 17;306(7):729-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1141. PMID: 21846854.

  67. Jaffe JS, Ginsberg PC, Gill R, Harkaway RC. A new diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of microscopic hematuria. Urology. 2001 May;57(5):889-94. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)01124-9. PMID: 11337288.

  68. Koushik R, Garvey C, Manivel C, Matas AJ, Kasiske B. Persistent, asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in prospective kidney donors. Transplantation 2005; 80: 1425-9

  69. Khadra MH, Pickard RS, Charlton M, Powell PH, Neal DE. A prospective analysis of 1,930 patients with hematuria to evaluate current diagnostic practice. J Urol. 2000 Feb;163(2):524-7. PMID: 10647670.

  70. Edwards TJ, Dickinson AJ, Natale S, Gosling J, McGrath JS. A prospective analysis of the diagnostic yield resulting from the attendance of 4020 patients at a protocol-driven haematuria clinic. BJU Int. 2006 Feb;97(2):301-5; discussion 305. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.05976.x. PMID: 16430634.

  71. Caliskan Y, Yildiz A. Evaluation of the medically complex living kidney donor. J Transplant. 2012;2012:450471. doi: 10.1155/2012/450471. Epub 2012 May 13. PMID: 22655169; PMCID: PMC3359716.

  72. White SL, Rawlinson W, Boan P, Sheppeard V, Wong G, Waller K, Opdam H, Kaldor J, Fink M, Verran D, Webster A, Wyburn K, Grayson L, Glanville A, Cross N, Irish A, Coates T, Griffin A, Snell G, Alexander SI, Campbell S, Chadban S, Macdonald P, Manley P, Mehakovic E, Ramachandran V, Mitchell A, Ison M. Infectious Disease Transmission in Solid Organ Transplantation: Donor Evaluation, Recipient Risk, and Outcomes of Transmission. Transplant Direct. 2018 Dec 20;5(1):e416. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000852. PMID: 30656214; PMCID: PMC6324914.

  73. Allen UD, Preiksaitis JK, AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Epstein-Barr virus and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013; 13 Suppl 4: 107–120.

  74. Malinis M, Boucher HW. Screening of donor and candidate prior to solid organ transplantation-Guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Clin Transplant. 2019. 33(9):e13548. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13548.

  75. Levitsky J, Doucette K, AST Infectious Diseases Community of Practice. Viral hepatitis in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013; 13 Suppl 4: 147–168.

  76. Burdick RA, Bragg-Gresham JL, Woods JD, et al. Patterns of hepatitis B prevalence and seroconversion in hemodialysis units from three continents: the DOPPS. Kidney Int. 2003; 63: 2222–2229.

  77. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Hepatitis C Work Group. KDIGO 2018 Clinical Practice Guideline on the Prevention, Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Treatment of Hepatitis C in Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2018;8:91–165.

  78. Kotton CN, Kumar D, Caliendo AM, et al. Updated international consensus guidelines on the management of cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2013; 96: 333–360.

  79. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 797 of June 22, 2019, "On Approval of the Rules for Procurement, Storage, Transportation, and Clinical Use of Donor Blood and Its Components and on Invalidation of Certain Acts of the Government of the Russian Federation".

  80. Guidance on microbiological safety of human organs, tissues and cells used in transplantation. Advisory Committee on the Safety of Blood Tissues and Organs (SaBTO); 2025.

  81. Cook RI, Wreathall J, Smith A, Cronin DC, Rivero O, Harland RC, Raman J, Battles J, Reason J. Probabilistic risk assessment of accidental ABO-incompatible thoracic organ transplantation before and after 2003. Transplantation. 2007 Dec 27;84(12):1602-9. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000295931.39616.25. PMID: 18165771.

  82. Montgomery JR, Berger JC, Warren DS, James NT, Montgomery RA, Segev DL. Outcomes of ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation in the United States. Transplantation. 2012 Mar 27;93(6):603-9. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318245b2af. PMID: 22290268; PMCID: PMC3299822.

  83. Tait BD, Süsal C, Gebel HM, Nickerson PW, Zachary AA, Claas FH, Reed EF, Bray RA, Campbell P, Chapman JR, Coates PT, Colvin RB, Cozzi E, Doxiadis II, Fuggle SV, Gill J, Glotz D, Lachmann N, Mohanakumar T, Suciu-Foca N, Sumitran-Holgersson S, Tanabe K, Taylor CJ, Tyan DB, Webster A, Zeevi A, Opelz G. Consensus guidelines on the testing and clinical management issues associated with HLA and non-HLA antibodies in transplantation. Transplantation. 2013 Jan 15;95(1):19-47. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31827a19cc. PMID: 23238534.

  84. Opelz G. Impact of HLA compatibility on survival of kidney transplants from unrelated live donors. Transplantation. 1997 Nov 27;64(10):1473-5. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199711270-00017. PMID: 9392314.

  85. Fuggle SV, Allen JE, Johnson RJ, Collett D, Mason PD, Dudley C, Rudge CJ, Bradley JA, Watson CJ; Kidney Advisory Group of NHS Blood and Transplant. Factors affecting graft and patient survival after live donor kidney transplantation in the UK. Transplantation. 2010 Mar 27;89(6):694-701. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181c7dc99. PMID: 20308863.

  86. Gloor JM, Lager DJ, Moore SB, Pineda AA, Fidler ME, Larson TS, Grande JP, Schwab TR, Griffin MD, Prieto M, Nyberg SL, Velosa JA, Textor SC, Platt JL, Stegall MD. ABO-incompatible kidney transplantation using both A2 and non-A2 living donors. Transplantation. 2003 Apr 15;75(7):971-7. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000058226.39732.32. PMID: 12698082

  87. Montgomery RA, Lonze BE, King KE, Kraus ES, Kucirka LM, Locke JE, Warren DS, Simpkins CE, Dagher NN, Singer AL, Zachary AA, Segev DL. Desensitization in HLA-incompatible kidney recipients and survival. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 28;365(4):318-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012376. PMID: 21793744

  88. Taylor CJ, Kosmoliaptsis V, Summers DM, Bradley JA. Back to the future: application of contemporary technology to long-standing questions about the clinical relevance of human leukocyte antigen-specific alloantibodies in renal transplantation. Hum Immunol. 2009 Aug;70(8):563-8. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 May 13. PMID: 19445992.

  89. Collaborative Transplant Study Newsletter. Heidelberg University Institute of Immunology; 2004.

  90. Maron BJ, Shirani J, Poliac LC, Mathenge R, Roberts WC, Mueller FO. Sudden death in young competitive athletes. Clinical, demographic, and pathological profiles. JAMA. 1996 Jul 17;276(3):199-204. PMID: 8667563.

  91. Finocchiaro G, Westaby J, Sheppard MN, Papadakis M, Sharma S. Sudden Cardiac Death in Young Athletes: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Jan 16;83(2):350-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.10.032. PMID: 38199713.

  92. Halvorsen S, Mehilli J, Cassese S, Hall TS, Abdelhamid M, Barbato E, De Hert S, de Laval I, Geisler T, Hinterbuchner L, Ibanez B, Lenarczyk R, Mansmann UR, McGreavy P, Mueller C, Muneretto C, Niessner A, Potpara TS, Ristić A, Sade LE, Schirmer H, Schüpke S, Sillesen H, Skulstad H, Torracca L, Tutarel O, Van Der Meer P, Wojakowski W, Zacharowski K; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 14;43(39):3826-3924. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2023 Nov 7;44(42):4421. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad577. PMID: 36017553.

  93. Correction to: 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: Developed by the task force for cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care (ESAIC). Eur Heart J. 2023 Nov 7;44(42):4421. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad577. Erratum for: Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 14;43(39):3826-3924. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270. PMID: 37675631.

  94. Habbous S, Arnold J, Begen MA, Boudville N, Cooper M, Dipchand C, Dixon SN, Feldman LS, Goździk D, Karpinski M, Klarenbach S, Knoll GA, Lam NN, Lentine KL, Lok C, McArthur E, McKenzie S, Miller M, Monroy-Cuadros M, Nguan C, Prasad GVR, Przech S, Sarma S, Segev DL, Storsley L, Garg AX; Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR) Network. Duration of Living Kidney Transplant Donor Evaluations: Findings From 2 Multicenter Cohort Studies. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Oct;72(4):483-498. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.036. Epub 2018 Mar 24. PMID: 29580662.

  95. Kim IK, Tan JC, Lapasia J, Elihu A, Busque S, Melcher ML. Incidental kidney stones: a single center experience with kidney donor selection. Clin Transplant. 2012 Jul-Aug;26(4):558-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01567.x. Epub 2011 Dec 14. PMID: 22168332; PMCID: PMC4125573.

  96. Strang AM, Lockhart ME, Amling CL, Kolettis PN, Burns JR. Living renal donor allograft lithiasis: a review of stone related morbidity in donors and recipients. J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):832-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.022. Epub 2008 Jan 25. PMID: 18221961.

  97. Rizkala E, Coleman S, Tran C, Isac W, Flechner SM, Goldfarb D, Monga M. Stone disease in living-related renal donors: long-term outcomes for transplant donors and recipients. J Endourol. 2013 Dec;27(12):1520-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0203. Epub 2013 Nov 21. PMID: 24261656.

  98. Tan N, Charoensak A, Ajwichai K, Gritsch HA, Danovitch G, Schulam P, Lu DS, Margolis DJ, Raman SS. Prevalence of incidental findings on abdominal computed tomography angiograms on prospective renal donors. Transplantation. 2015 Jun;99(6):1203-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000486. PMID: 25651306.

  99. Maizlin ZV, Barnard SA, Gourlay WA, Brown JA. Economic and ethical impact of extrarenal findings on potential living kidney donor assessment with computed tomography angiography. Transpl Int. 2007 Apr;20(4):338-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2006.00443.x. PMID: 17326774.

  100. Andrews PA, Burnapp L. British Transplantation Society / Renal Association UK Guidelines for Living Donor Kidney Transplantation 2018: Summary of Updated Guidance. Transplantation. 2018 Jul;102(7):e307. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002253. PMID: 29688993; PMCID: PMC7228639.

  101. Weinberger S, Baeder M, Scheurig-Muenkler C, Steffen IG, Magheli A, Miller K, Kempkensteffen C. Optimizing scintigraphic evaluation of split renal function in living kidney donors using the geometric mean method: a preliminary retrospective study. J Nephrol. 2016 Jun;29(3):435-441. doi: 10.1007/s40620-015-0223-z. Epub 2015 Aug 19. PMID: 26286903.

  102. Weinberger S, Klarholz-Pevere C, Liefeldt L, Baeder M, Steckhan N, Friedersdorff F. Influence of CT-based depth correction of renal scintigraphy in evaluation of living kidney donors on side selection and postoperative renal function: is it necessary to know the relative renal function? World J Urol. 2018 Aug;36(8):1327-1332. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2272-0. Epub 2018 Mar 22. PMID: 29569036.

  103. Wahba R, Franke M, Hellmich M, Kleinert R, Cingöz T, Schmidt MC, Stippel DL, Bangard C. Computed Tomography Volumetry in Preoperative Living Kidney Donor Assessment for Prediction of Split Renal Function. Transplantation. 2016 Jun;100(6):1270-7. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000889. PMID: 26356175.

  104. Ethics Committee of the Transplantation Society. The consensus statement of the Amsterdam Forum on the Care of the Live Kidney Donor. Transplantation. 2004 Aug 27;78(4):491-2. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000136654.85459.1e. PMID: 15446304.

  105. Taliercio JJ, Nurko S, Poggio ED. Living donor kidney transplantation: an update on evaluation and medical implications of donation. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2011 Mar;63(1):73-87. PMID: 21336247.

  106. Galeev ShR. Surgical technique, short-term and long-term outcomes of horseshoe kidney transplantation / Sh.R. Galeev // Russian Journal of Transplantology and Artificial Organs. – 2015. – Vol. 17, No. 4. – P. 72-76. – DOI 10.15825/1995-1191-2015-4-72-76. – EDN VCOUHP.

  107. Galeev RKh. Surgical features of kidney transplantation in variant forms of renal vessels / R.Kh. Galeev, Sh.R. Galeev // Kazan Medical Journal. – 2005. – Vol. 86, No. 2. – P. 117-126. – EDN HRTZSN.

  108. Kostyuchenko MV. Modern methods for the prevention of thromboembolic complications in the postoperative period. Consilium Medicum. 2019; 21 (8): 102–107.

  109. Lutsey PL, Zakai NA. Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Apr;20(4):248-262. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00787-6. Epub 2022 Oct 18. PMID: 36258120; PMCID: PMC9579604.

  110. Khan F, Tritschler T, Kahn SR, Rodger MA. Venous thromboembolism. Lancet. 2021 Jul 3;398(10294):64-77. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32658-1. Epub 2021 May 10. PMID: 33984268.

  111. NICE Guidance on VTE. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG92

  112. Kakkar AK. Prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgery. In: Colman RW, Clowes AW, George JN, Goldhaber SZ, Marder VJ,eds. Hemostasis and thrombosis: basic principles and clinical practice. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2006: 1361-7.

  113. Martinez-Sobalvarro JV, Júnior AAP, Pereira LB, Baldoni AO, Ceron CS, Dos Reis TM. Antimicrobial stewardship for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical site infections: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Apr;44(2):301-319. doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01358-4. Epub 2021 Nov 29. PMID: 34843035.

  114. Seidelman JL, Mantyh CR, Anderson DJ. Surgical Site Infection Prevention: A Review. JAMA. 2023 Jan 17;329(3):244-252. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.24075. PMID: 36648463.

  115. Dellinger EP, Gross PA, Barrett TL, Krause PJ, Martone WJ, McGowan JE Jr, Sweet RL, Wenzel RP. Quality standard for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 1994 Mar;18(3):422-7. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.3.422. PMID: 8011827.

  116. Bratzler DW, Houck PM; Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; American Association of Critical Care Nurses; American Association of Nurse Anesthetists; American College of Surgeons; American College of Osteopathic Surgeons; American Geriatrics Society; American Society of Anesthesiologists; American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons; American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses; Ascension Health; Association of periOperative Registered Nurses; Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology; Infectious Diseases Society of America; Medical Letter; Premier; Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America; Society of Thoracic Surgeons; Surgical Infection Society. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project. Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Jun 15;38(12):1706-15. doi: 10.1086/421095. Epub 2004 May 26. PMID: 15227616.

  117. Orlando G, Manzia TM, Sorge R, Iaria G, Angelico R, Sforza D, Toti L, Peloso A, Patel T, Katari R, Zambon JP, Maida A, Salerno MP, Clemente K, Di Cocco P, De Luca L, Tariciotti L, Famulari A, Citterio F, Tisone G, Pisani F, Romagnoli J. One-shot versus multidose perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis after kidney transplantation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Surgery. 2015 Jan;157(1):104-10. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Oct 8. PMID: 25304836.

  118. Choi SU, Lee JH, Oh CK, Shin GT, Kim H, Kim SJ, Kim SI. Clinical significance of prophylactic antibiotics in renal transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2013 May;45(4):1392-5. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.10.059. PMID: 23726580.

  119. Chowdhury AH, Cox EF, Francis ST, Lobo DN. A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of 2-L infusions of 0.9% saline and plasma-lyte® 148 on renal blood flow velocity and renal cortical tissue perfusion in healthy volunteers. Ann Surg. 2012 Jul;256(1):18-24. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318256be72. Erratum in: Ann Surg. 2013 Dec;258(6):1118. PMID: 22580944.

  120. Shaw AD, Bagshaw SM, Goldstein SL, Scherer LA, Duan M, Schermer CR, Kellum JA. Major complications, mortality, and resource utilization after open abdominal surgery: 0.9% saline compared to Plasma-Lyte. Ann Surg. 2012 May;255(5):821-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825074f5. PMID: 22470070.

  121. Varadhan KK, Lobo DN. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of intravenous fluid therapy in major elective open abdominal surgery: getting the balance right. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010 Nov;69(4):488-98. doi: 10.1017/S0029665110001734. Epub 2010 Jun 2. Erratum in: Proc Nutr Soc. 2010 Nov;69(4):660. PMID: 20515521.

  122. Lennerling A, Lovén C, Dor FJ, Ambagtsheer F, Duerinckx N, Frunza M, Pascalev A, Zuidema W, Weimar W, Dobbels F. Living organ donation practices in Europe - results from an online survey. Transpl Int. 2013 Feb;26(2):145-53. doi: 10.1111/tri.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 1. PMID: 23198985.

  123. Antcliffe D, Nanidis TG, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP, Papalois VE. A meta-analysis of mini-open versus standard open and laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Transpl Int. 2009 Apr;22(4):463-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2008.00828.x. Epub 2009 Jan 20. PMID: 19175543.

  124. Greco F, Hoda MR, Alcaraz A, Bachmann A, Hakenberg OW, Fornara P. Laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: analysis of the existing literature. Eur Urol. 2010 Oct;58(4):498-509. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.04.003. Epub 2010 Apr 18. PMID: 20417024.

  125. Wilson CH, Sanni A, Rix DA, Soomro NA. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;(11):CD006124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006124.pub2. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 9;5:CD006124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006124.pub3. PMID: 22071829.

  126. Yuan H, Liu L, Zheng S, Yang L, Pu C, Wei Q, Han P. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis. Transplant Proc. 2013 Jan-Feb;45(1):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.152. PMID: 23375276.

  127. Dols LF, Kok NF, Ijzermans JN. Live donor nephrectomy: a review of evidence for surgical techniques. Transpl Int. 2010 Feb;23(2):121-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2009.01027.x. Epub 2009 Dec 10. PMID: 20003169.

  128. Nicholson ML, Kaushik M, Lewis GR, Brook NR, Bagul A, Kay MD, Harper SJ, Elwell R, Veitch PS. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg. 2010 Jan;97(1):21-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6803. PMID: 19937983.

  129. Kourounis G, Tingle SJ, Hoather TJ, Thompson ER, Rogers A, Page T, Sanni A, Rix DA, Soomro NA, Wilson C. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 9;5(5):CD006124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006124.pub3. PMID: 38721875; PMCID: PMC11079970.

  130. Breda A, Schwartzmann I, Emiliani E, Rodriguez-Faba O, Gausa L, Caffaratti J, de León XP, Villavicencio H. Mini-laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy with the use of 3-mm instruments and laparoscope. World J Urol. 2015 May;33(5):707-12. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1360-z. Epub 2014 Sep 3. PMID: 25182807.

  131. Giacomoni A, Di Sandro S, Lauterio A, Concone G, Buscemi V, Rossetti O, De Carlis L. Robotic nephrectomy for living donation: surgical technique and literature systematic review. Am J Surg. 2016 Jun;211(6):1135-42. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.019. Epub 2015 Oct 21. PMID: 26499052.

  132. Lentine KL, Lam NN, Axelrod D, Schnitzler MA, Garg AX, Xiao H, Dzebisashvili N, Schold JD, Brennan DC, Randall H, King EA, Segev DL. Perioperative Complications After Living Kidney Donation: A National Study. Am J Transplant. 2016 Jun;16(6):1848-57. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13687. Epub 2016 Mar 10. PMID: 26700551.

  133. Autorino R, Brandao LF, Sankari B, Zargar H, Laydner H, Akça O, De Sio M, Mirone V, Chueh SC, Kaouk JH. Laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) vs laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2015 Feb;115(2):206-15. doi: 10.1111/bju.12724. Epub 2014 Jul 15. PMID: 24588876.

  134. Alcaraz A, Musquera M, Peri L, Izquierdo L, García-Cruz E, Huguet J, Alvarez-Vijande R, Campistol JM, Oppenheimer F, Ribal MJ. Feasibility of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted living donor nephrectomy: is kidney vaginal delivery the approach of the future? Eur Urol. 2011 Jun;59(6):1019-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.021. Epub 2011 Mar 23. PMID: 21458151.

  135. Gurluler E, Berber I, Cakir U, Gurkan A. Transvaginal route for kidney extraction in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):e2014.00156. doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00156. PMID: 25419107; PMCID: PMC4236079.

  136. Hsu TH, Su Li, Ratner LE, Trock BJ, Kavoussi LR. Impact of renal artery multiplicity on outcomes of renal donors and recipients in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology. 2003 Feb;61(2):323-7. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02124-6. PMID: 12597939.

  137. Chedid MF, Muthu C, Nyberg SL, Lesnick TG, Kremers WK, Prieto M, Heimbach JK, Chow GK, Stegall MD, Dean PG. Living donor kidney transplantation using laparoscopically procured multiple renal artery kidneys and right kidneys. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jul;217(1):144-52; discussion 152. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.010. PMID: 23791283.

  138. Broudeur L, Karam G, Chelghaf I, De Vergie S, Rigaud J, Perrouin Verbe MA, Branchereau J. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy in case of right kidney and multiple-renal artery kidney: a systematic review of the literature. World J Urol. 2020 Apr;38(4):919-927. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02821-8. Epub 2019 May 25. PMID: 31129713.

  139. Garg AX, Muirhead N, Knoll G, Yang RC, Prasad GV, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Housawi A, Boudville N; Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR) Network. Proteinuria and reduced kidney function in living kidney donors: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Kidney Int. 2006 Nov;70(10):1801-10. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001819. Epub 2006 Sep 27. PMID: 17003822.

  140. Thiel GT, Nolte C, Tsinalis D, Steiger J, Bachmann LM. Investigating kidney donation as a risk factor for hypertension and microalbuminuria: findings from the Swiss prospective follow-up of living kidney donors. BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 22;6(3):e010869. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010869. PMID: 27006347; PMCID: PMC4809071.

  141. Boudville N, Prasad GV, Knoll G, Muirhead N, Thiessen-Philbrook H, Yang RC, Rosas-Arellano MP, Housawi A, Garg AX; Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR) Network. Meta-analysis: risk for hypertension in living kidney donors. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 1;145(3):185-96. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-3-200608010-00006. PMID: 16880460.

  142. Garg AX, Nevis IF, McArthur E, Sontrop JM, Koval JJ, Lam NN, Hildebrand AM, Reese PP, Storsley L, Gill JS, Segev DL, Habbous S, Bugeja A, Knoll GA, Dipchand C, Monroy-Cuadros M, Lentine KL; DONOR Network. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia in living kidney donors. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 8;372(2):124-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1408932. Epub 2014 Nov 14. PMID: 25397608; PMCID: PMC4362716.

  143. Ibrahim HN, Akkina SK, Leister E, Gillingham K, Cordner G, Guo H, Bailey R, Rogers T, Matas AJ. Pregnancy outcomes after kidney donation. Am J Transplant. 2009 Apr;9(4):825-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02548.x. PMID: 19353771; PMCID: PMC2747242.

  144. Reisaeter AV, Røislien J, Henriksen T, Irgens LM, Hartmann A. Pregnancy and birth after kidney donation: the Norwegian experience. Am J Transplant. 2009 Apr;9(4):820-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02427.x. Epub 2008 Oct 6. PMID: 18853953.

  145. Garg AX, McArthur E, Lentine KL; Donor Nephrectomy Outcomes Research (DONOR) Network. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia in living kidney donors. N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 9;372(15):1469-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1501450. PMID: 25853753.

  146. Galeev ShR. Kidney transplantation in variant forms of renal vessels: specialty 14.00.27: dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Medical Sciences / Galeev Shamil Rinatovich. – Kazan, 2005. – 104 p. – EDN NPZQCN.

  147. Fehrman-Ekholm I, Elinder CG, Stenbeck M, Tydén G, Groth CG. Kidney donors live longer. Transplantation. 1997 Oct 15;64(7):976-8. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199710150-00007. PMID: 9381544.

  148. Keys DO, Jackson S, Berglund D, Matas AJ. Kidney donor outcomes ≥ 50 years after donation. Clin Transplant. 2019 Oct;33(10):e13657. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13657. Epub 2019 Jul 31. PMID: 31283043.

  149. Fehrman-Ekholm I, Nordén G, Lennerling A, Rizell M, Mjörnstedt L, Wramner L, Olausson M. Incidence of end-stage renal disease among live kidney donors. Transplantation. 2006 Dec 27;82(12):1646-8. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000250728.73268.e3. PMID: 17198252.

  150. Najarian JS, Chavers BM, McHugh LE, Matas AJ. 20 years or more of follow-up of living kidney donors. Lancet. 1992 Oct 3;340(8823):807-10. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92683-7. PMID: 1357243.

  151. Ibrahim HN, Foley R, Tan L, Rogers T, Bailey RF, Guo H, Gross CR, Matas AJ. Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 29;360(5):459-69. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804883. PMID: 19179315; PMCID: PMC3559132.

  152. Segev DL, Muzaale AD, Caffo BS, Mehta SH, Singer AL, Taranto SE, McBride MA, Montgomery RA. Perioperative mortality and long-term survival following live kidney donation. JAMA. 2010 Mar 10;303(10):959-66. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.237. PMID: 20215610.

  153. Muzaale AD, Massie AB, Wang MC, Montgomery RA, McBride MA, Wainright JL, Segev DL. Risk of end-stage renal disease following live kidney donation. JAMA. 2014 Feb 12;311(6):579-86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.285141. PMID: 24519297; PMCID: PMC4411956.

  154. Mjøen G, Hallan S, Hartmann A, Foss A, Midtvedt K, Øyen O, Reisæter A, Pfeffer P, Jenssen T, Leivestad T, Line PD, Øvrehus M, Dale DO, Pihlstrøm H, Holme I, Dekker FW, Holdaas H. Long-term risks for kidney donors. Kidney Int. 2014 Jul;86(1):162-7. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.460. Epub 2013 Nov 27. PMID: 24284516.

  155. Living Kidney Donor Follow-Up Conference Writing Group; Leichtman A, Abecassis M, Barr M, Charlton M, Cohen D, Confer D, Cooper M, Danovitch G, Davis C, Delmonico F, Dew MA, Garvey C, Gaston R, Gill J, Gillespie B, Ibrahim H, Jacobs C, Kahn J, Kasiske B, Kim J, Lentine K, Manyalich M, Medina-Pestana J, Merion R, Moxey-Mims M, Odim J, Opelz G, Orlowski J, Rizvi A, Roberts J, Segev DL, Sledge T, Steiner R, Taler S, Textor S, Thiel G, Waterman A, Williams E, Wolfe R, Wynn J, Matas AJ. Living kidney donor follow-up: state-of-the-art and future directions, conference summary and recommendations. Am J Transplant. 2011 Dec;11(12):2561-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03816.x. Epub 2011 Nov 4. PMID: 22054039.

  156. Davis CL. Living kidney donor follow-up: state-of-the-art and future directions. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2012 Jul;19(4):207-11. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2012.03.002. PMID: 22732039.

  157. Pippias M, Skinner L, Noordzij M, Reisaeter AV, Abramowicz D, Stel VS, Jager KJ. Pregnancy after living kidney donation, a systematic review of the available evidence, and a review of the current guidance. Am J Transplant. 2022 Oct;22(10):2360-2380. doi: 10.1111/ajt.17122. Epub 2022 Aug 3. PMID: 35716049; PMCID: PMC9804926.

  158. van Buren MC, Meinderts JR, Oudmaijer CAJ, de Jong MFC, Groen H, Royaards T, Maasdam L, Tielen M, Reinders MEJ, Lely AT, van de Wetering J. Long-Term Kidney and Maternal Outcomes After Pregnancy in Living Kidney Donors. Transpl Int. 2023 Jun 28;36:11181. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11181. PMID: 37448449; PMCID: PMC10337757.

  159. Kortram K, Ijzermans JN, Dor FJ. Perioperative Events and Complications in Minimally Invasive Live Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Transplantation. 2016 Nov;100(11):2264-2275. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001327. PMID: 27428715.

  160. Goldfarb DA. Re: Perioperative Events and Complications in Minimally Invasive Live Donor Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2):422. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.093. Epub 2016 Oct 5. PMID: 28093161.

  161. Chu KH, Poon CK, Lam CM, Cheuk A, Yim KF, Lee W, Tang HL, Chan HW, Fung KS, Tong KL. Long-term outcomes of living kidney donors: a single centre experience of 29 years. Nephrology (Carlton). 2012 Jan;17(1):85-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2011.01524.x. PMID: 21919999.

  162. Fehrman-Ekholm I, Kvarnström N, Söfteland JM, Lennerling A, Rizell M, Odén A, Simonsson T. Post-nephrectomy development of renal function in living kidney donors: a cross-sectional retrospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Jul;26(7):2377-81. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr161. Epub 2011 Mar 31. PMID: 21459783.

  163. Li SS, Huang YM, Wang M, Shen J, Lin BJ, Sui Y, Zhao HL. A meta-analysis of renal outcomes in living kidney donors. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jun;95(24):e3847. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003847. Erratum in: Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Aug 07;95(31):e5074. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000490009.39850.74. PMID: 27310964; PMCID: PMC4998450.

  164. Bin Mohamed Ebrahim ME, Singla A, Yao J, Laurence JM, Wong G, Lau H, Lee T, Yuen L, Lim WH, Pleass H. Outcomes of live renal donors with a history of nephrolithiasis; A systematic review. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2023 Jan;37(1):100746. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2022.100746. Epub 2022 Dec 23. PMID: 36587468.

  165. Mackinnon S, Aitken E, Ghita R, Clancy M. A comparison of the effects of oral vs. intravenous hydration on subclinical acute kidney injury in living kidney donors: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMC Nephrol. 2017 Jan 19;18(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0447-3. PMID: 28103829; PMCID: PMC5244581.

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

Arzumanov

Sergey Viktorovich

Head of the Transplantation and Renal Replacement Therapy Group, Lopatkin Research Institute of Urology and Interventional Radiology – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Centre of the Russian Ministry of Health (Obninsk), MD, member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Bykov

Aleksandr Yu.

Chief Transplantologist of Novosibirsk Oblast, surgeon at the Organ Transplantation Surgical Department, State Novosibirsk Regional Clinical Hospital (Novosibirsk), PhD, member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Galeev

Shamil Rinatovich

Deputy Director – Head of the Volzhsky Branch of the National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after Academician V.I. Shumakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Volzhsky), Chief Transplantologist of the Southern and North Caucasian Federal Districts, MD, member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Gichkun

Olga Evgenyevna

Leading Researcher, Department of Regulatory Mechanisms in Transplantology, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after Academician V.I. Shumakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow), PhD, Associate Professor, member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Gauthier

Sergey Vladimirovich

Director of the National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after Academician V.I. Shumakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow), Academician of the RAS, Chief Freelance Transplantologist of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chairman of the Russian Transplantation Society, MD, Professor, Academician of the RAS

Zainutdinov Zainudin Musayevich

Head of the Clinic, Federal Research Center of Nutrition and Biotechnology (Moscow), Doctor of Medical Sciences

Kurbangulov Ildar Raisovich

Surgeon at Surgical Department No. 1, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after Academician V.I. Shumakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow), PhD, member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Malakhov Aleksey Gennadyevich

Surgeon at Surgical Department No. 1, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after Academician V.I. Shumakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow), member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Mozheyko Natalya Pavlovna

Head of the Pathology Department, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after Academician V.I. Shumakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow), MD, member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Saydulaev Dzhabrail Azizovich

Head of Surgical Department No. 1, Surgeon, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after Academician V.I. Shumakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow), PhD, member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Sapozhnikov

Arkady Davidovich

Deputy Head of the Branch for Medical Care Organization, Oncologist, Volzhsky Branch of the National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after Academician V.I. Shumakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Volzhsky), PhD, member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Semchenko

Sergey Borisovich

Head of the Center for Human Organ and Tissue Transplantation, Surgeon, Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1 of Tyumen Oblast (Tyumen), PhD, member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Khomyakov

Sergey Mikhailovich

Deputy Director – Head of the Center for Organizational and Methodological Guidance of Institutions Engaged in Activities Related to Human Organ and/or Tissue Transplantation, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after Academician V.I. Shumakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow), PhD, member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Chebotareva Natalya Viktorovna

Head of the Center for Excellence in Nephrology Care, Head of the Nephrology Department, National Medical Research Center of Transplantology and Artificial Organs named after Academician V.I. Shumakov of the Russian Ministry of Health, MD, Professor, member of the Russian Transplantation Society

Conflict of interest.

The working group declares no conflict of interest.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience of these clinical guidelines:

  • obstetricians-gynecologists;

  • anesthesiologists-intensivists;

  • cardiologists;

  • nephrologists;

  • general practitioners (family doctors);

  • healthcare organizers;

  • general practitioners (internal medicine);

  • urologists;

  • surgeons;

  • endocrinologists.

Table 1. Scale for grading levels of evidence (LoE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Studies without sequential reference-standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

Table 2. Scale for assessing the levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitation interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis

2

Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

Table 3. Scale for assessing grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

GoR

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines

The update mechanism for clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data regarding the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 519n of July 29, 2022, "On Approval of the Procedure for Medical Examination of a Donor Who Has Given Written Informed Voluntary Consent to the Removal of His/Her Organs and/or Tissues for Transplantation".

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms — Living Kidney Donation

Appendix C. Patient Information

Who can be considered a living kidney donor?

A donor can be an individual aged 18 or older who has undergone a full medical examination, has been deemed fit for nephrectomy (removal of one kidney) for subsequent transplantation, and has a blood (genetic) relationship with the recipient (the person receiving the kidney). The willingness to donate one's kidney for a relative must be confirmed by voluntary consent in the prescribed form.

What does a living-related kidney transplantation surgery involve?

The surgery is performed under general anesthesia and consists of three stages:

The first stage is the extraction of one kidney from the donor. In many transplant centers, nephrectomy in a living donor is performed laparoscopically, i.e., through small punctures and small incisions on the abdomen, ensuring minimal trauma and rapid postoperative recovery. Open nephrectomy is also an option.

The second stage is the preparation of the harvested organ for transplantation.

The third stage is the transplantation of the kidney into the recipient, also performed under general anesthesia.

What are the advantages of living kidney donation over deceased donation?

The main advantages of living-related donor transplantation include superior short- and long-term recipient and graft survival rates, a more predictable and stable function of the transplanted kidney, and the absence of a long waiting period with the possibility of performing the transplantation before the initiation of renal replacement therapy. Living-related donor transplantation involves a very short period of cold storage of the kidney in a preservation solution, resulting in minimal injury to the graft. Furthermore, good human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility between a related donor and recipient allows for a less aggressive post-operative immunosuppressive therapy. All of this yields better graft function and survival outcomes, with a significantly lower incidence of delayed graft function.

How long does a transplanted kidney function?

On average, half of the transplanted kidneys continue to function after 12–15 years, compared to 8–10 years for deceased donor kidney transplants. There are numerous cases where the function of the transplanted kidney remains satisfactory for 30 years or more. In addition, extensive experience has been accumulated with repeat kidney transplantations.

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Information is not available.

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer using the clinical guidelines for "Living Kidney Donation" and other active Russian Ministry of Health clinical guidelines with a reference to the specific section, rather than paraphrasing foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines