Neuromuscular scoliosis: clinical guidelines

Applies toadults, children2025 editionM41.4

Clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults, children. 2025 edition, ICD-10 codes: M41.4. This page features an abridged version by WhiteCoat Pro and the full official text.

Get research articles on «Neuromuscular scoliosis»Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in English, with figures, sample sizes, and conclusions. Plus updates to Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary of the guideline text, 2025 edition. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

Neuromuscular scoliosis is a three-dimensional spinal deformity that occurs in disorders associated with impaired nerve impulse conduction or neuromuscular transmission. The guideline covers diagnostics, selection of conservative or surgical management, as well as anesthetic, postoperative, and rehabilitative patient care.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Take a medical history: established or suspected neuromuscular disorder, age of deformity onset, its dynamics, rate of progression of complaints, prior treatment, motor activity, comorbidities, drug and device dependence, allergies. Specifically inquire about dyspnea, its onset, and its relationship with exertion. → in text
  2. Upon examination, assess frontal and sagittal balance, spinal mobility via the traction test, pelvic obliquity, postural control, limb contractures, muscle strength, pain on the VAS, and BMI. → in text
  3. Organize initial consultations with a neurologist and an orthopedic trauma surgeon; if a neuromuscular disorder or hereditary pathology is suspected, consult a geneticist. In case of respiratory or cardiovascular impairment or metabolic disorders, involve the relevant subspecialist. → in text
  4. Perform complete blood count, biochemical blood analysis, and urinalysis; at the outpatient stage, also test for sodium, potassium, chlorides, blood group, Rh factor, markers of viral infections and syphilis, and hemostasis parameters. → in text
  5. To assess the deformity, obtain radiographs of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine in anteroposterior and lateral projections (taking into account the possibility of verticalization), as well as an anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis. Prior to surgery, perform a spinal CT; spinal MRI is performed as needed to evaluate the spinal cord, myelopathy, and vertebromedullary conflict. → in text
  6. Before surgery, evaluate respiratory function, cough efficacy, and sleep-related breathing disorders; an ambient air SpO2 below 95% requires additional evaluation of partial pressure of carbon dioxide. Evaluate the heart using ECG, echocardiography, Holter monitoring, and, if necessary, cardiac MRI, and assess bone density via densitometry. → in text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

When is a brace needed in neuromuscular scoliosis?

Bracing is used for deformities exceeding 20°, especially in rapidly growing children, provided the brace does not impair pulmonary function. This is the primary approach when surgical indications are absent, or in the presence of a BMI under 12 or severe osteoporosis with a Z-score under −2.5 SD. → in text

At what Cobb angle of scoliosis is surgery indicated?

Surgery is considered for scoliosis greater than 40° by Cobb, and for SMA greater than 50°. Additional indications include hyperkyphosis or hyperlordosis greater than 50°, global imbalance, rapid progression, or the need for verticalization and improved quality of life. → in text

How often should radiography be performed before skeletal maturation?

For curves less than 15–20°, once a year; for curves greater than 20°, every 6 months. After skeletal maturation, the need for repeated radiography is determined by clinical evaluation. → in text

Do all patients with neuromuscular diseases require ICU monitoring after surgery?

Yes. All patients with neuromuscular diseases after surgery, regardless of the extent of the intervention and duration of anesthesia, are recommended to be monitored in the ICU for cardiovascular and respiratory monitoring, as well as non-invasive ventilation and coughing assistance if necessary. → in text

When should rehabilitation be started and what restrictions should be observed after surgery?

Rehabilitation is carried out at all stages; after surgical correction, the wheelchair is adapted if necessary, and moving in it is recommended from days 2–5, while a tilt table is used in the early postoperative period. Bending and twisting of the torso, as well as hip flexion greater than 90°, should be avoided for up to 9 months. → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
726, edition 2 (ID 726_2)
Publication date
November 14, 2025
Age category
adults, children
ICD-10 codes
M41.4
Specialties
Traumatology and OrthopedicsMedical Rehabilitation
Developers
Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedics of Russia
All-Russian Public Organization "Union of Rehabilitologists of Russia"
Russian Association of Spine Surgeons
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Rubricator — 726_2

Abridged Clinical Guidelines: Neuromuscular Scoliosis

An abbreviated version of this guideline from WhiteCoat Pro — 40 pages: every section of the document is summarized concisely in our own words, with tests and fill-in-the-blanks for self-assessment. Needed when a guideline doesn't just need to be read, but mastered — for an exam, accreditation, or clinical practice.
All abbreviated guidelines: 310
Beginning of abbreviated version — open

Definition

Neuromuscular scoliosis is a three-dimensional spinal deformity that acts as an orthopedic complication of neuromuscular diseases.

The pathology is associated with:

  • impaired nerve impulse conduction along the nerve fiber;
  • impaired neuromuscular transmission.

Etiology and pathogenesis

Depending on the level of the lesion, spinal deformities are classified into two main groups: neuropathic and myopathic.

1. Neuropathic deformities

As a rule, they are progressive in nature. They are subdivided depending on the level of the motor neuron lesion:

  • With upper (first) motor neuron lesion:
  • Cerebral palsy (CP);
  • Syringomyelia;
  • Central nervous system (CNS) tumors.
  • With lower (second) motor neuron lesion:
  • Poliomyelitis and other viral myelitis;
  • Spinal muscular atrophies (SMA) and other diseases.

2. Myopathic deformities

Develop against the background of primary muscle pathology:

  • Muscular dystrophies (Duchenne muscular dystrophy, merosin-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy);
  • Myasthenia gravis.

Special forms (associated with neoplasms and surgical intervention):

  • Neuromuscular scoliosis (kyphoscoliosis) can develop against the background of a spinal cord tumor or after its surgical removal without adequate spinal stabilization. In such cases, the term denervating or paralytic scoliosis (kyphoscoliosis) is used.
  • Following surgical treatment of spinal tumors, a deformity may develop that is similar in nature to a post-laminectomy or post-traumatic deformity.

Levels of nervous system lesion in neuromuscular scoliosis

Depending on the level of impaired nerve impulse conduction, lesions are divided into two main groups:

1. Neuropathic lesions

Cover the structures of the nervous system from the brain to the peripheral nerves. They include lesions at the following levels:

  • 1st motor neuron of the cerebral cortex.
  • 1st motor neuron of the brainstem.
  • Spinal cord.
  • 2nd motor neuron of the anterior horns of the spinal cord.
  • Efferent nerves.

2. Myopathic lesions

  • Affect directly the effector organ — the muscle receiving the signal.

Epidemiology of neuromuscular diseases (NMD) and spinal deformities

The incidence of spinal deformity directly depends on the specific nosological diagnosis (the primary neuromuscular disease) and the severity of its clinical manifestations.

Prevalence of spinal deformities in various NMDs:

  • Cerebral palsy — 25%
  • Poliomyelitis — 17–80%
  • Myelodysplasia — 60%
  • Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) — 67%
  • Friedreich's ataxia — 80%
  • Duchenne muscular dystrophy — 90%
  • Spinal cord injury (if injury received under the age of 10) — 100%

NMD Population Statistics:

  • Global statistics: the total prevalence of NMD is approximately 1 case per 3,000 – 3,500 population.
  • Statistics for the Russian Federation:
  • Official data (federal registry): more than 1,300 patients.
  • Estimated data (extrapolation to the total population of the Russian Federation): approximately 48,000 patients with NMD are assumed.
  • Note on the cut-off text: Progressive muscular dystrophies and spinal amyotrophies are highlighted as the most (likely prevalent/significant in the structure of morbidity).

Epidemiological data (continued)

  • The prevalence of certain diseases from the studied group is 13–33 and 10 cases per 100,000 population, respectively.
The official full text of the guideline below remains open and free. Only the condensed study version as a whole is paid: section-by-section explanations, self-assessment tests, and integration with platform materials.

List of Abbreviations

ALT – alanine aminotransferase

AST – aspartate aminotransferase

BiPAP – Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure, BPAP, BiPAP

CPAP – Constant Positive Airway Pressure, CPAP

VAS – Borg visual analogue scale

DAG – dystrophin-glycoprotein complex

RF – respiratory failure

DNA – deoxyribonucleic acid

CP – cerebral palsy

FVC – forced vital capacity

ACE inhibitor – angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ATX C09AA ACE inhibitors)

MV – invasive mechanical ventilation

kDa – kilodalton

CT – computed tomography

CK – creatine phosphokinase (synonym – creatine kinase)

ABG – arterial blood gas composition

LDH – lactate dehydrogenase

INR – international normalized ratio

MRI – magnetic resonance imaging

NIV – non-invasive ventilation

NMD – neuromuscular diseases

FEV1 – forced expiratory volume in the first second of the forced expiration maneuver

MUAP – motor unit action potentials

BMD – Becker muscular dystrophy

DMD – Duchenne muscular dystrophy

PEF – peak expiratory flow

PCF – peak cough flow

RNA – ribonucleic acid

SMA – spinal muscular atrophy

SMA I – spinal muscular atrophy, type I

ATD – assistive technology devices

FSI FSBSI «Research Centre for Medical Genetics» of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation

FVC – functional vital capacity

CP – cerebral palsy

ECG – electrocardiography

EMG – electromyography

ENMG – electroneuromyography

EchoCG – echocardiography

GMFCS – Gross Motor Function Classification System, Scale of global motor impairments

CFCS – Communication Function Classification System

MACS – Manual Ability Classification System

MFM – Motor Function Measure, scale for assessing motor function in patients with neuromuscular diseases

HFMSE – Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded, expanded Hammersmith functional motor scale for SMA patients

RULM – Revised Upper Limb Module in SMA

Terms and Definitions

Amyotrophy (Friedreich's ataxia, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, Roussy-Levy syndrome): equinus foot deformity (clubfoot), kyphoscoliosis; gait and handwriting disturbance, dysarthria, leg weakness; hearing impairment and loss, impaired deep sensation, progressive muscle atrophy, optic atrophy, cataract, pelvic organ dysfunction, dementia, diabetes mellitus, hypogonadism, rhythm disorders, atrioventricular and intraventricular conduction abnormalities. Population frequency: 2.7:100,000. Sex ratio: unknown. Inheritance type: autosomal recessive [113].

Congenital structural myopathies are a heterogeneous group of genetically determined diseases with various inheritance types and a variety of clinical courses. Muscle function is impaired. Common features of congenital structural myopathies include early onset (from birth or the first months of life), generalized muscle hypotonia, decreased or absent tendon reflexes, muscle atrophy, and skeletal structural anomalies. As a rule, a non-progressive course.

Hyperkyphosis – exceeding the limits of normal parameters of the thoracic spine in the sagittal plane (>40°).

Hypokyphosis – flattening of the thoracic kyphosis beyond the lower limit of its normal parameters (<20°), but without the formation of a thoracic lordosis.

Gibbus – sharp-peaked angular kyphosis.

Kyphosis – change in the shape of a spinal segment in the sagittal plane with the formation of a deformity, with a posteriorly facing convexity; abnormal kyphosis.

Kyphoscoliosis – a combination of scoliotic deformity with true hyperkyphosis. Rotational deformity combined with apparent kyphosis should not be designated by this term.

Spinal correction and instrumental fixation – a surgical intervention during which correction and stabilization of spinal segments are performed using fixation devices.

Muscular dystrophy – Duchenne muscular dystrophy and Becker muscular dystrophy are X-linked recessive disorders characterized by progressive proximal muscle weakness caused by degeneration of muscle fibers. Becker dystrophy has a later onset and causes milder symptoms.

Muscular dystrophies are a clinically heterogeneous group of disorders that all share the clinical characteristics of progressive muscle weakness. The term "dystrophy", used in its strictest pathological sense, refers to chronic and severe myopathic changes in muscles. Most muscular dystrophies share common pathological features of fibrosis and fatty tissue replacement, especially in the later stages of the disease. A clinically and genetically diverse group of hereditary disorders of the structure of striated muscle, including cardiac muscle, characterized by progressive muscle weakness and wasting. Progressive motor deficit.

Neuromuscular diseases (NMD) are a vast group of genetic heterogeneous diseases whose main clinical manifestations are weakness and atrophy of various muscle groups.

Proximal 5q spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a severe autosomal recessive neuromuscular disease characterized by progressive symptoms of flaccid paralysis and muscle atrophy due to degeneration of anterior horn α-motor neurons of the spinal cord [1].

Spinal muscular dystrophies (SMA) are a group of hereditary childhood diseases first described by Werdnig in 1891. The disease manifests as symmetric atrophy of the lower motor neurons of the anterior horns and roots of the spinal cord, which causes progressive paralysis against the background of neuromuscular transmission disorders.

GMFCS is an international classification system of motor functions for patients with cerebral palsy older than two years, which assesses the patient's general functional activity in their usual environment and the degree of its limitation. Crucially, it evaluates the everyday level of activity, rather than the maximum possible level demonstrated only during examination.

The Risser sign is a quantitative test that determines the stage of ossification of the iliac apophysis, which begins at the anterior superior iliac spine and proceeds dorsally toward the posterior superior iliac spine. The process indicates skeletal maturation stages and takes an average of two years. According to Risser, the iliac crest is divided into 4 parts, and the staging is as follows: Risser-0 (absence of the apophyseal shadow), Risser-1 (ossification involving up to 25% of the crest), Risser-2 (ossification involving up to 50% of the crest), Risser-3 (ossification involving up to 75% of the crest), Risser-4 (complete ossification of the crest), Risser-5 (fusion of the apophysis and the iliac body). Risser-4 corresponds to the cessation of spinal growth.

Spina bifida is a failure of closure of the vertebral canal resulting from defective fusion of the vertebral arches (spina bifida posterior) or bodies (spina bifida anterior).

Spina bifida aperta (open spinal dysraphism) is a synonym commonly used for congenital neural tube defects—combined malformations of the spinal canal, spinal cord, and its membranes, including meningomyeloceles, lipomyelomeningoceles, and rachischisis.

Spina bifida occulta (hidden spinal dysraphism) is a failure of fusion of the vertebral arches not accompanied by the formation of a spinal hernia.

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Neuromuscular scoliosis is a three-dimensional spinal deformity and an orthopedic complication of a group of neuromuscular disorders characterized by "impaired nerve impulse conduction along the nerve fiber or associated with impaired neuromuscular transmission" [2].

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

Depending on the level of the lesion, neuropathic and myopathic spinal deformities are distinguished [3].

The former are subdivided into disorders affecting the upper motor neuron and the lower motor neuron (Fig. 1). Neuropathic deformities associated with upper motor neuron lesions include scoliosis in patients with cerebral palsy (CP), syringomyelia, and central nervous system tumors. Spinal deformities caused by lower motor neuron lesions may result from poliomyelitis and other viral myelitides, spinal muscular atrophies, and other conditions. As a rule, spinal deformity in these pathologies is progressive in nature [4, 5].

Myopathic spinal deformities can occur in muscular dystrophies (Duchenne muscular dystrophy, merosin-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy) and myasthenia gravis.

Additionally, neuromuscular scoliosis (kyphoscoliosis) can develop both secondary to a spinal cord tumor and following its resection without adequate spinal stabilization [6]. In such states, it is appropriate to refer to it as denervating or paralytic (kyphoscoliosis). Following surgical treatment of spinal tumors, a deformity similar in character to post-laminectomy or post-traumatic deformity may develop [7, 8].

1.2 Etiology and Pathogenesis of the Disease or Condition (Group of Diseases or Conditions) — Neuromuscular Scoliosis
Fig. 1. Diagram of nervous system lesion levels along the neural impulse pathway in various types of neuromuscular scoliosis (from the Spine Surgery Information Portal atlas, Prof. Dr. med. J. Harms).

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

The incidence of spinal deformity depends on the underlying neuromuscular disease and the severity of its manifestations [9].

Table 1. Prevalence of spinal deformities in neuromuscular diseases

Diagnosis

Percentage

Cerebral palsy

25

Poliomyelitis

17-80

Myelodysplasia

60

Spinal muscular atrophy

67

Friedreich ataxia

80

Duchenne muscular dystrophy

90

Spinal cord injury (injury before age 10)

100

The total prevalence of neuromuscular diseases is approximately 1 in 3,000–3,500 of the population across various global populations [10, 11, 12]. Currently, the federal register of the Russian Federation contains over 1,300 patients; however, extrapolating these statistics to the population of the Russian Federation suggests there are approximately 48,000 patients with neuromuscular diseases in the country. Progressive muscular dystrophies and spinal amyotrophies are the most common disorders in this group (13–33 patients per 100,000 population and 10 patients per 100,000 population, respectively [12]).

The prevalence of proximal spinal muscular atrophy is 1 in 6,000–10,000 newborns [13]. Data on the prevalence of this disease in the Russian Federation are lacking. The carrier frequency in the general population is 1/40–1/50 [14, 15]. According to the Research Centre for Medical Genetics (Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation), the carrier frequency of spinal muscular atrophy in Russia is 1 in 36 individuals, with an estimated incidence of 1 in 5,184 newborns [16].

Scoliosis is highly prevalent in children with type 1 and type 2 spinal muscular atrophy, with an incidence of 60–90% and onset in early childhood [17, 18].

The overall incidence of scoliosis in the cerebral palsy population ranges from 21% to 76%, depending on the case series and the severity of cerebral palsy [11, 12, 19, 20, 21, 22]. Curves are typically under 40°, but the magnitude of scoliosis depends on the severity of cerebral palsy [11]. The incidence of scoliosis increases with age and decreased mobility. Persson-Bunke M. et al. found that the risk of developing scoliosis increases with advancing age in patients with cerebral palsy and higher GMFCS levels (patients with cerebral palsy and GMFCS levels IV–V have a 50% risk of clinically moderate or severe scoliosis by age 18) [20]. Hägglund G. et al. showed that 8% of patients with GMFCS level V had clinical signs of scoliosis by age 5, and 75% of patients with GMFCS level V developed a spinal deformity with a Cobb angle ≥40° by age 20 [23].

Lumbar hyperlordosis or thoracic kyphoscoliosis are also frequently observed in cerebral palsy [22]. The natural history of scoliosis progression in patients with cerebral palsy indicates that flexible spinal deformity begins between 3 and 10 years of age, with rapid progression to rigid scoliosis [19]. Gu Y. et al. determined that patients with quadriplegic cerebral palsy and a deformity >40° by 12 years of age had a higher probability of progression compared to those with a curve ≤40° at the same age [24].

The prevalence of Friedreich ataxia in Caucasians is estimated at 1/20,000 to 1/50,000, and scoliosis develops in 60–79% of patients [25].

In patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy who do not receive glucocorticoids, the probability of developing severe progressive scoliosis is approximately 90% [26, 27], whereas the probability of osteoporosis-induced vertebral compression fractures is low. Daily glucocorticoid therapy has been shown to reduce the risk of scoliosis [28, 29], although the risk of vertebral fractures increases [30, 31].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

M41.4 – Neuromuscular scoliosis. Scoliosis due to cerebral palsy, Friedreich ataxia, poliomyelitis, and other neuromuscular disorders.

In these clinical guidelines, aspects of the course of various neuromuscular diseases are considered solely within the framework of risk assessment, preoperative evaluation, and intra- and postoperative patient management.

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

The most comprehensive etiological classification of scoliosis, kyphosis, and lordosis was presented by Lonstein E.J. et al. (1995) [32]:

I. Idiopathic

A. Infantile (0 to 3 years):

1. resolving;

2. progressive.

B. Juvenile (3 to 10 years).

C. Adolescent (older than 10 years).

II. Neuromuscular

A. Neuropathic:

1. Upper motor neuron lesions:

a. cerebral palsy;

b. spinocerebellar degeneration:

1) Friedreich disease;

2) Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease;

3) Roussy-Levy syndrome;

c. syringomyelia;

d. spinal cord tumor;

e. spinal cord injury;

f. other causes.

2. Lower motor neuron lesions:

a. poliomyelitis;

b. other viral myelitides;

c. trauma;

d. spinal muscular atrophies:

1) Werdnig-Hoffmann disease;

2) Kugelberg-Welander disease;

3) myelomeningocele (paralytic).

3. Dysautonomia (Riley-Day syndrome).

4. Other.

B. Myopathic.

1. Arthrogryposis.

2. Muscular dystrophy.

3. Congenital hypotonia.

4. Myotonic dystrophy.

5. Other.

III. Congenital

A. Disorders of formation.

1. Wedge vertebra.

2. Hemivertebra.

B. Segmentation defects.

1. Unilateral.

2. Bilateral.

C. Mixed anomalies.

IV. Neurofibromatosis

V. Mesenchymal disorders

A. Marfan syndrome.

B. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome.

C. Other.

VI. Rheumatoid diseases

A. Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis.

B. Other.

VII. Post-traumatic deformities

A. Post-fracture.

B. Post-surgical.

1. Post-laminectomy.

2. Post-thoracoplasty.

VIII. Due to extra-spinal contractures

A. Post-empyema.

B. Post-burn.

IX. Osteochondrodystrophic

A. Diastrophic dwarfism.

B. Mucopolysaccharidosis (e.g., Morquio disease).

C. Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia.

D. Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia.

E. Achondroplasia.

F. Other.

X. Due to osteomyelitis.

XI. Metabolic disorders.

A. Rickets.

B. Osteogenesis imperfecta.

C. Homocystinuria.

D. Other.

XII. Due to lumbosacral junction pathology.

A. Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis.

B. Congenital lumbosacral anomalies.

XIII. Due to tumors.

A. Of the spinal column.

1. Osteoid osteoma.

2. Histiocytosis X.

3. Other.

B. Of the spinal cord (see neuromuscular scoliosis).

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

Clinical manifestations of spinal deformity in NMD are characterized by the development of:

1) scoliosis;

2) kyphosis;

3) kyphoscoliosis;

4) lumbar hyperlordosis;

5) pelvic obliquity;

6) torsional chest deformity.

The main features of the course of NMD are presented in Table 2 [33, 34].

Table 2. Main features of neuromuscular diseases [116]

Disease (frequency)

Onset (years)

Inheritance

Life expectancy (years)

Presentation

Progression of weakness

Loss of ambulation (years)

Muscular dystrophies

Duchenne (1:4,000 newborn males)

1,5-4

XL

20±4

Proximal muscle weakness, lower limbs weaker than upper limbs, extensors weaker than flexors, heart and respiratory system muscles

Rapid deterioration from 5 to 13 years, slower after 14 years

10±2,5

Becker (4:100,000 newborn males)

8,5±8,5

Cholesterol

23-89

Distribution similar to Duchenne

Slow deterioration

25-58

Leyden dystrophy (frequency cannot be estimated)

9±4

AR

Variable

Distribution similar to Duchenne and Becker, except for the absence of a difference between extensors and flexors

Rapid loss

75% by age 20

Myotonic (AKA Steinert's) (1:20,000 newborns)

23±13

BP

Variable (depends on arrhythmias)

Facial weakness affected first, ptosis, generalized weakness of voluntary limb muscles, distal muscle weakness, neck, facial, diaphragmatic, and intercostal muscle weakness. Heart block develops, inability to release grip

Slow loss

Late in life, if it develops

Congenital myotonic

From birth

AR

Variable

Severe weakness, floppy infant, requires ventilation and nutritional support in infancy, moderate intellectual disability

May never achieve the ability to walk

Arthrogryposis (1:3,000 newborns)

From birth

Non-genetic, embryonic akinesia, 30% AR

Normal (50% neonatal mortality with CNS CNS?)

Focal weakness in the presence of severe joint contractures: classically hands, wrists, elbows, shoulders, hips, feet, and knees. Severe cases, all joints including jaw and spine.

Static, may progress with dysfunction, atrophy may be present, and muscles or muscle groups may be absent

Variable

Spinal muscular atrophy (1:6,000 newborns)

Type I (acute infantile, acute Werdnig-Hoffmann disease)

0-0,5

AR

1.5 (50% die before reaching 2 years of age)

Severe generalized muscle weakness leading to inability to feed and breathe, inability to sit

Never walk

Type II (chronic Werdnig-Hoffmann disease)

2

30-40

Proximal muscle weakness, lower limbs weaker than upper limbs, extensors weaker than flexors, sit, but difficulty with walking if able at all

Progression is variable

Early loss

Type III (Kugelberg-Welander disease)

23±19

normal

Proximal muscle weakness, no difference between lower and upper limbs or flexors and extensors

Slow loss

Very late, if it occurs

Poliomyelitis (incidence in 2003: 623 cases worldwide)

Variable

Acquired (Nigeria, India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt)

Normal (respiratory support may be required)

Prodrome: fever 5-7 days before the onset of headache, neck stiffness, paraspinal muscle weakness, asymmetric peripheral weakness (on one side only, or worse on one side), spread depends on the level of spinal cord lesion, sensory abnormalities with hypersensitivity

Rapid onset, progression to paralysis, permanent or temporary with possible moderate delayed regression

Variable, depending on severity, subclinical, non-paralytic, paralytic

Hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy

Charcot-Marie (1:2,500 newborns)

13±14

BP

Comparatively normal

Distal muscle weakness, no difference between upper and lower limbs, or between flexors and extensors

Slow loss

Later, if it occurs

Cerebral palsy (2:1000 newborns)

From birth

Perinatal CNS lesions; 30% AR

Variable (depends on mobility; unable to sit: 30; able to sit: 46; able to walk: 62)

Spastic (50%): stiff, difficult movements

Dyskinetic/athetoid (20%): involuntary uncontrolled movements

Ataxic (rare): poor coordination and balance

Mixed (30%): combination of these types

Hypotonia may progress to spasticity

Variable

Spinocerebellar dysfunction

Hereditary Friedreich ataxia

10±5

AR

Early adulthood 38±14 (cardiac)

Initial difficulty walking, ataxia, followed by spread to the arms, then the trunk, muscle weakness, muscle wasting: feet, legs, arms, progressive loss of sensitivity, nystagmus, cardiomyopathy, myocardial fibrosis

Slow progression

15–20 years after diagnosis

AD – autosomal dominant; AR – autosomal recessive; XL – X-linked;

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

Criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition based on:

  1. Anamnestic data – established or suspected neuromuscular disease;

  2. Physical examination data – signs of spinal deformity in the frontal or sagittal planes;

  3. Laboratory tests – confirmed neuromuscular disease based on genetic testing;

  4. Instrumental examination – spinal deformity confirmed by instrumental diagnostic methods.

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

  • In patients with neuromuscular diseases, for a comprehensive assessment of the patient's status and its dynamics, it is recommended to evaluate:

    – the severity of complaints reported by the patient and their parents (for children);

    – the onset time of spinal deformity and the rate of its progression;

    – the rate of onset and progression of complaints;

    – history of prior treatment;

    – level of physical activity, its conditions and limitations;

    – presence of comorbid conditions;

    – ongoing pharmacotherapy or device dependency and their duration;

    – presence of allergies or drug intolerance [32].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: the first stage of diagnosis is taking the medical history. It is necessary to find out at what age and by whom the spinal deformity was first noticed, whether the patient's parents sought medical attention, whether treatment was carried out, what specific treatment was given, and what the effect was. The child's activity and age-appropriate development are assessed. Available medical documentation, previous treatments, and specialist opinions are evaluated. At this stage, it is already possible to suspect a hereditary genetic syndrome or disease. When dysmorphic stigmata, various external signs of deviation from normal development—such as impaired organ formation, growth abnormalities, changes in hair growth, skin color and moisture, developmental anomalies, and gross deviations from the norm based on general clinical and paraclinical examination results—are identified, the patient is primarily referred for a consultation with a geneticist. If a specific hereditary genetic syndrome or disease is identified, additional diagnostic methods are prescribed to determine the state and function of various organs and systems that may be involved in the pathological process of this disease. If a genetic pathology is already known, the focus in preoperative evaluation is on target organs and systems that may be involved in the underlying disease. Otherwise, the management tactics for syndromic scoliosis, in the absence of gross deviations from the norm, do not differ from those for congenital and idiopathic scoliosis.

The next stage is eliciting the patient's complaints. In spinal deformity surgery, this element of examination takes on special significance. There are usually two main complaints: a cosmetic defect associated with spinal and chest deformity, and pain syndrome, although it is not necessary for the patient to present with both complaints. During the initial conversation with the patient, they may be absent altogether. It should be taken into account that the patient's self-assessment of their appearance is extremely variable. Complaints not immediately related to spinal deformity, such as sleep, appetite, nutrition, fatigue, activity, shortness of breath, mobility and range of motion in joints, and frequency of colds, which may also suggest the need for further examination, are also evaluated.

It is necessary to find out if the patient is bothered by shortness of breath, when it was first noted, under what exertion it occurs, and whether it worsens over the years.

2.2 Physical Examination

  • To assess the orthopedic status in all patients with neurogenic spinal deformities, it is recommended to evaluate:

    – frontal and sagittal spinal balance;

    – spinal mobility using the traction test;

    – compensation of pelvic obliquity;

    – postural control independently or using assistive devices (AD);

    – presence and severity of limb contractures;

    – muscle strength using a muscle strength grading scale (Appendix G1);

    – pain using the visual analogue scale (VAS) (if present) (Appendix G2);

    – BMI [3, 12, 13, 22, 33, 58].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: Universal functional scales include: Gross Motor Function Classification System – GMFCS (Appendix G3), as well as CFCS (Appendix G4), MACS (Appendix G5), MFM (Appendix G6), and nosology-specific scales: Revised Upper Limb Module – RULM (Appendix G7), Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded – HFMSE (Appendix G8), which can be optionally applied by neurologists and physical and rehabilitation medicine physicians depending on the underlying disease.

  • All patients with suspected or confirmed neuromuscular disease are recommended an initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a neurologist to assess and document neurological status [3, 12, 13, 22, 23].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • All patients with suspected or confirmed neuromuscular disease are recommended an initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by an orthopedic traumatologist to assess and describe orthopedic status [3, 12, 13, 22, 23].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: All patients with suspected or confirmed neuromuscular disease should undergo a joint examination by a neurologist and an orthopedic traumatologist for the purpose of diagnosis and coordination of treatment tactics.

  • All patients with suspected neuromuscular disease or hereditary genetic pathology are recommended an initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a geneticist to conduct genetic testing, verify or rule out genetic pathology [3, 12, 13, 22, 23].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • Patients with neuromuscular diseases who have comorbid respiratory, cardiovascular, metabolic disorders, etc., are recommended a consultation with a relevant specialist [36, 98, 99, 100, 101].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: Consultants' recommendations are implemented solely in agreement with the attending physician, except in situations requiring emergency medical care.

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

  • Patients with NMD are recommended to undergo clinical, biochemical, and other tests to assess the patient's condition in accordance with the existing clinical manifestations of vertebral and extravertebral pathology [32].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • In the outpatient setting, patients with NMD are recommended to undergo the following laboratory tests:

    – blood sodium level test,

    – blood potassium level test,

    – blood chloride level test,

    – determination of ABO blood groups,

    – determination of Rh factor (Rhesus D antigen),

    – determination of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in the blood,

    – determination of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in the blood,

    – determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 in the blood,

    – determination of IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 in the blood,

    – determination of antibodies to Treponema pallidum in non-treponemal tests (RPR, RPR/USR) (qualitative and semi-quantitative test) in blood serum,

    – coagulogram (screening hemostasis test),

    – complete blood count (CBC),

    – general general-medical blood biochemistry test,

    – urinalysis [32].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • In the outpatient setting, patients with NMD are recommended specialist consultations to predict disease progression:

    – pediatric patients require an initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a pediatrician, while adult patients require an initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a general practitioner (therapist).

    – initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a neurologist;

    – initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a geneticist (if diagnosis is unverified) [205, 206];

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • In the inpatient setting, patients with NMD are recommended to undergo laboratory tests:

    – coagulogram (screening hemostasis test),

    – complete blood count (CBC),

    – general general-medical blood biochemistry test,

    – urinalysis [32, 202].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: other laboratory tests are prescribed by the attending physician based on recommendations from other medical specialists.

  • In the inpatient setting, patients with NMD are recommended specialist consultations to assess somatic status and intervention risks:

    – pediatric patients require an initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a pediatrician, while adult patients require an initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a general practitioner (therapist).

    – initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist,

    – initial examination (evaluation, consultation) by a neurologist;

    – consultations with other medical specialists as prescribed by the attending physician [32].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

  • To determine the tactics of conservative and surgical treatment, all patients with spinal deformity are recommended to undergo:

    – radiography of the cervical spine,

    – radiography of the thoracic and lumbar spine in anteroposterior and lateral projections while standing (if verticalization is possible in ambulatory-stage patients), sitting (if verticalization is possible in early non-ambulatory stage patients), or supine (in late non-ambulatory stage patients),

    – radiography of the pelvis in the anteroposterior projection while supine [3].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: anteroposterior radiographs are recommended to be performed annually for spinal curvature of less than 15-20°, and every 6 months for curvature greater than 20° until skeletal maturity. An interval of more than 1 year between radiographs increases the likelihood that scoliosis progression will go unnoticed. After skeletal maturity, the decision on the need for radiography is re-evaluated based on clinical assessment.

  • To determine the tactics of surgical treatment, all patients with spinal deformity are recommended to undergo computed tomography of the spine (prior to surgical intervention) [3]

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: computed tomography provides information on damage to the bone structure of the vertebrae, making it possible to assess the shape and size of the structures of the vertebrae and the spinal canal, which is especially important when planning surgical interventions. Great attention is paid to studying the structural features and torsion of the vertebrae at the apex of the deformity, as well as osteopenia of the caudal lumbosacral spine and pelvis, which determine the scope and planning of the surgical intervention.

  • To determine the tactics of surgical treatment, all patients with spinal deformity are recommended to undergo magnetic resonance imaging of the spine (if necessary, prior to surgical intervention) [3].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: MRI provides accurate information on the condition of the spinal cord. The morphology of vertebral syndrome, the presence of myelopathy, and vertebromedullary conflict are identified quite clearly.

  • To assess respiratory lung function during the preparation stage for surgical treatment, it is recommended to study unforced respiratory volumes and flows using a peak flow meter, perform remote monitoring of pulmonary function parameters, and undergo spiral CT of the lungs [35, 36].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended to perform an electrocardiogram, echocardiography, 24-hour cardiac rhythm monitoring, and MRI of the heart and great vessels (if necessary) before surgery to assess the risks of anesthesia or sedation, monitor cardiac dysfunction (myocardial hypertrophy, arrhythmias, various conduction blocks), and optimize cardiotropic therapy [35-37, 118].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • It is recommended to perform whole-body and lumbar spine dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to rule out osteoporosis when preparing for surgical intervention [35, 118].

  • with a frequency of 1 time per year

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: given the extremely limited motor activity of patients with NMD, it is important to focus on "bone density". Pronounced osteoporosis (Z-score <-2.5 SD) is a limitation to surgical correction of scoliosis due to the high risk of implant-related complications [122, 123].

Patients with SMA are characterized by a high frequency of fractures and osteopenia. These risks are caused not only by muscle weakness and low mobility of patients, but also by the fact that the SMN gene plays a role in bone tissue metabolism [38].

  • For patients with type I 5q SMA, as well as patients with type II SMA, it is recommended to determine the partial pressure of oxygen in soft tissues (oximetry) during night sleep at the slightest suspicion to detect nocturnal hypoventilation and obstructive sleep apnea [39].

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

Comments: the use of pulse oximetry as the sole method for monitoring nocturnal hypoventilation is considered acceptable when capnography is not available. Normally, saturation levels are within 95-100%. If SpO2 is below 90%, urgent measures must be taken. Saturation between 94-90% is considered borderline. Patients with hypoventilation are recommended to have a pulse oximeter at home.

  • Patients with proximal muscle hypotonia and muscle weakness who do not have genetic confirmation of the diagnosis are recommended to undergo magnetic resonance imaging of the muscular system for the purpose of differential diagnosis between 5q SMA and other neuromuscular disorders [40].

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

Comments: muscle MRI reveals fatty replacement of muscle tissue. A characteristic lesion pattern is visualized—hypertrophy and relative sparing of the adductor longus muscle, which is quite specific for spinal muscular atrophy. However, this specific lesion pattern manifests at a late stage of the disease; at the very onset of the disease and in young children, it is quite difficult to detect.

  • All patients with SMA type I and SMA type II older than 5 years with a decrease in forced expiration by 45% or more are recommended to undergo cardiorespiratory monitoring once every 6 months to monitor the progression of respiratory disorders [114].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

  • Pediatric patients with 5q SMA are recommended to undergo polysomnography if hypoventilation is suspected, to clarify its nature and rule out sleep apneas [41].

GCR ALoE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2).

Comments: patients with SMA are prone to sleep-related breathing disorders, most commonly hypoventilation due to reduced tidal volume, impaired diaphragm function, and decreased function of the intercostal and accessory muscles. There is also obstructive syndrome due to weakness of the laryngeal and pharyngeal muscles, predisposing to upper airway collapse [114].

Patients with NMD are recommended a preoperative respiratory function assessment to determine the risk of respiratory complications (risks of decreased respiratory muscle strength, worsening hypoventilation, impaired airway secretion clearance, aspiration, obstructive and central apneas. These conditions can lead to nosocomial infections, prolonged mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, and in some cases, death.) [35].

Respiratory function assessment should include a detailed medical history and physical examination, targeted chest radiography, evaluation of respiratory function and cough efficacy, as well as screening for sleep-disordered breathing [35, 36]. Respiratory function assessment includes measurement of vital capacity (study of unforced respiratory volumes and flows (spirometry)) and daytime pulse oximetry (SpO2). An SpO2 of less than 95% on room air is defined as a clinically significant pathological value requiring additional assessment of carbon dioxide partial pressure.

Assessment of the severity of hypoventilation to clarify its nature and rule out sleep apnea in adults has not been described; however, we consider it appropriate to extend the recommendation "to perform polysomnography if hypoventilation is suspected to clarify its nature and rule out sleep apnea" to adult patients with 5q SMA.

Respiratory failure is a frequent cause of death, especially in DMD [45].

  • All patients with NMD, for the purpose of preventing and dynamically monitoring cardiac insufficiency, are recommended to undergo invasive blood pressure monitoring [113, 114, 119].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

2.5 Other Procedures

It is recommended: for pediatric patients with an atypical variant of SMA, if the 5q SMA diagnosis is not genetically confirmed, for the purpose of differential diagnosis of 5q SMA and other neuromuscular disorders:

– muscle biopsy [46];

– pathological (morphological) examination of muscle tissue biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods for differential diagnosis [46].

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

Comments: morphological examination of muscle biopsies in patients with spinal muscular atrophy reveals non-specific signs of fascicular atrophy and grouping of muscle fibers. Most of the enlarged muscle fibers belong to type I. All immunohistochemical markers will be normal. Ultrastructural changes will also be non-specific.

Data on the necessity of evaluation and results of muscle tissue biopsy (surgical) material in adult patients with atypical forms of 5q SMA are absent. It is advisable to address this issue within a multidisciplinary medical board [Consensus of the authors of the clinical guideline].

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

3.1. Conservative management

It is recommended to use spinal bracing in patients with neuromuscular diseases (NMD) to support weakened spinal muscle tone and treat scoliosis >20°, especially in rapidly growing children [47, 48].

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

Comments: there is no inter-expert consensus on the type of braces to be used in such patients. Most experts recommend rigid thoracolumbar spinal orthoses (functionally corrective braces) with support on the pelvis, the lower thoracic aperture, and with an "abdominal window".

  • Patients with NMD are recommended any options of custom-made rigid thoracolumbar spinal orthoses that allow maintaining a sitting position, provided they do not impair pulmonary function [49].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • Conservative treatment methods are recommended as a leading component in the following situations:

    – in the absence of indications for surgical treatment;

    – in the presence of limitations for surgical correction of scoliosis: low BMI <12; severe osteoporosis (Z-score < -2.5 SD) [50, 118, 119].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: orthotic management is a palliative method which, as a standalone method, is capable of influencing the progression of spinal deformity [48, 51].

Braces commonly used in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis are often ineffective in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) [52, 53, 54, 118, 119].

In addition, patients do not always adhere to brace-wearing rules. Seizure activity in epileptic forms, limitation of chest wall movements associated with brace wearing can exacerbate existing pulmonary problems and lead to pressure ulcers. Olafsson Y. et al. showed some limitations on curve progression in ambulatory patients with small lumbar curves [55]. Nakamura N. et al. demonstrated improvements in scoliosis, sitting stability, and caregiver satisfaction in a group of patients using TSLO functionally corrective braces [56]. Pettersson K. and Rodby-Bousquet E., having studied 251 patients with 2800 CP who used a brace, concluded that most children use them for functional improvement (stability, head control, and arm/hand function) rather than deformity prevention [57].

In patients with CP, it is recommended to use wheelchairs with lateral trunk support or custom seating inserts as a means to control spinal deformity [57].

It is recommended to use botulinum toxin type A** in the treatment of spasticity in peripheral nervous system diseases, including in the presence of spinal deformity.

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: Nuzzo R.M. et al. [155] reported that injection of botulinum toxin type A** into the muscles on the concave side of the scoliotic deformity helped slow down scoliosis progression and increase the effectiveness of bracing treatment. However, the short-term efficacy of botulinum toxin type A** and the fact that it cannot be used in later stages due to mechanical collapse of the spinal deformity should be taken into account.

3.2. Surgical treatment

  • Surgical intervention for correction and fixation of spinal segments for patients with NMD is recommended in cases of:

    – scoliosis greater than 40° Cobb (for SMA greater than 50°),

    – hyperkyphosis or hyperlordosis greater than 50° Cobb,

    – global trunk imbalance in the frontal and (or) sagittal plane,

    – rapid progression of scoliotic deformity (more than 5° per year, for SMA ≥10° annually),

    – the need for verticalization and improvement of quality of life [22, 61-67].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: in DMD patients receiving glucocorticoids, surgical correction and fixation is justified if the frontal plane curvature or sagittal plane deviation is ≥30° Cobb, with a progression rate of ≥10° annually, as well as in case of osteoporotic vertebral fractures and persistent pain unresponsive to pharmacotherapy of these syndromes, regardless of skeletal maturity.

It is not recommended to perform surgical correction and fixation of spinal segments in the following cases:

– low BMI <12;

– severe osteoporosis (Z-score < -2.5 SD);

– unstable vital parameters [50, 118, 119].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: when making a decision on surgical intervention, it is recommended to take into account decreased respiratory function, rib cage deformity, hyperkyphosis, impact on patient mobility and functioning, pelvic obliquity, and trunk imbalance. It is recommended to postpone surgical intervention in children under 4 years of age [65].

In children aged 8 to 12 years, the surgical approach depends on clinical data, particularly regarding skeletal maturity and spinal growth.

  • In cases where pelvic obliquity is 15° or more, it is recommended to perform correction and posterior instrumented fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine involving the pelvis [68-71].

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

It is not recommended: to perform pelvic fixation in walking patients and in the absence of pelvic obliquity in non-ambulatory patients. It is important to maintain lumbosacral connection during rotational movements of the trunk during gait [72].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: in DMD, posterior spinal stabilization is justified only in non-ambulatory patients with spinal curvature greater than 20° who are not receiving glucocorticoids and have already reached spinal maturity [26, 74, 75].

It is recommended: in children under 12 years of age, to consider the use of the "dual growing rod technique" for spinal stabilization with or without pelvic fixation, depending on pelvic involvement in the scoliotic curve [12, 22, 61, 62, 76-82, 86].

For children, the Recommendation Strength Level is C (level of evidence – 4); for all patients, the Recommendation Strength Level is C (level of evidence – 5).

It is not recommended: to use endoprostheses for spinal fixation and osteosynthesis acting on the spine or ribs (VEPTR and its analogues) in patients with SMA to correct "collapsing umbrella" rib cage deformity due to the low efficacy of these methods [12, 22, 61, 62, 84, 86, 181].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended to leave one or two levels free in the mid-lumbar region along the midline in SMA patients when planning spinal surgery to allow for spinal punctures, including for targeted therapy delivery [49].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended: to perform intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) of the spinal cord conducting pathways with neuromuscular conduction control in patients with NMD regardless of motor status to reduce the risk of traction radiculopathy and sensorimotor impairments (Intraoperative Monitoring System) [87-92].

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

3.3. Other treatment

3.3.1 Anesthetic management of patients with neuromuscular diseases.

3.3.1.1 Preoperative management of patients with NMD

  • Preoperative preparation is recommended for all patients, even in the "asymptomatic" course [202].

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

Comments:

  • to assess respiratory reserve comprehensively: chest radiography or chest CT; CPET with peak cough flow assessment; pulmonologist consultation; overnight pulse oximetry or cardiorespiratory monitoring. In case of limited respiratory reserve, perioperative non-invasive ventilation and the use of manual and instrumental techniques to stimulate and facilitate coughing are mandatory. Especially in non-ambulatory patients, preoperative preparation must be supplemented by non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for at least 1 month prior to surgery [91, 92, 93, 94].

  • Cardiac assessment must be performed at least 2 months prior to surgery. If function is decreased, controlled therapy should be administered until surgical intervention. Cardiologist evaluation is recommended starting from 10 years of age [36].

  • Initial pediatric endocrinologist consultation with nutritional status optimization [95, 36].

  • Initial pediatric endocrinologist consultation with X-ray densitometry, and correction of osteopenia if detected [96].

  • Avoid premedicant medications that can cause respiratory depression and hypoventilation up to respiratory arrest [97].

  • Consider the administration of a stress dose of methylprednisolone** during surgery in patients receiving long-term steroid therapy (for the prevention of acute adrenal insufficiency) [98, 99, 100].

  • Tracheal intubation in patients with NMD should be performed according to existing and clinically relevant difficult airway protocols [97].

  • Central venous access should preferably be established under ultrasound guidance [101, 102].

  • Maintenance of normal body temperature [103].

  • Consider acquiring a new wheelchair or modifying the existing one (seat, backrest, armrests, headrest, etc.) prior to surgical treatment.

General principles of intraoperative management of patients with neuromuscular diseases

It is not recommended:

– premedication with agents that depress the respiratory center (opioids, benzodiazepine derivatives);

– Cholinesterase inhibitors (ATC group code N06DA) due to unpredictable response to neostigmine methylsulfate**. Inhalational anesthesia should be avoided whenever possible. Patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy should not receive inhalational halogenated hydrocarbons [176].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: minimizing blood loss volume and surgical time plays an important role, especially during extensive surgical interventions.

This aspect is detailed in the draft clinical guidelines by the National Public Association "Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists" of Russia entitled "Perioperative management of patients with neuromuscular diseases (draft)" [176].

3.3.2 Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis

  • In the surgical treatment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis, it is recommended to perform surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) of surgical site infection with a single preoperative administration of an antibacterial drug to reduce the risk of infectious complications [177]. The use of these medications should take into account the age restrictions specified in the instructions for medical use.

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments. For patients with an unremarkable allergic history and without significant risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage, first- and second-generation (I and II generation) cephalosporins (cefazolin**, cefuroxime**) are used for SAP, administered intravenously 30 to 60 minutes before the skin incision. In case of intolerance to beta-lactam antibacterials (penicillins), vancomycin** should be used, administered over a minimum of 60 minutes with the start of intravenous infusion 2 hours before the incision, or #clindamycin**. In the presence of significant risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRS) carriage, the SAP regimen should include systemic antibacterial drugs (ATC: J01) with anti-MRS activity (vancomycin**). In most cases, a single preoperative dose of a systemic antibacterial drug is sufficient for effective prophylaxis. For prolonged procedures (more than 3 hours) or massive blood loss, an additional intraoperative dose of a systemic antibacterial drug (ATC: J01) should be administered (the approximate timing of intraoperative administration is two half-lives after the preoperative dose). Administration of systemic antibacterial drugs (ATC: J01) after wound closure in the operating room is inappropriate, even in the presence of established drains.

Single doses of basic antibacterial drugs for SAP in trauma and orthopedic surgical interventions in adults: #cefazolin** 2 g (for patients weighing ≥120 kg – 3 g), cefuroxime** 1.5 g, #clindamycin** 900 mg, vancomycin** 15 mg/kg as a slow IV infusion, #ciprofloxacin** 400 mg (10 mg/kg in children), #levofloxacin** 500 mg (10 mg/kg in children) [177].

Single doses for children should be calculated based on actual weight: cefazolin** 30 mg/kg, cefuroxime** 50 mg/kg, #clindamycin** 10 mg/kg, vancomycin** 15 mg/kg [177, 192, 193].

3.3.3 Postoperative analgesia

  • For adequate pain management in patients with neuromuscular diseases, it is recommended to use multimodal analgesia for adults and children, taking into account age restrictions, which may include NSAIDs (from group M01A Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids), paracetamol**, gabapentinoids (ATC group code N02BF), and immediate-release opioids (ATC group code N02A) considering the age restrictions in the instructions for medical use; if multimodal analgesia cannot be prescribed, monomodal analgesia should be used [180, 181, 182, 194].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: Among pharmacological strategies, the current consensus is the use of multimodal analgesia (MMA), which involves the combination of several analgesics (opioid and non-opioid) from group N02 Analgesics with different mechanisms of action and non-pharmacological interventions aimed at targeting the peripheral and/or central parts of the nervous system [206]. This combination allows for more effective pain relief by enhancing the effects of various drugs, which in most cases leads to a reduction in the frequency of prescriptions and/or doses of opioid analgesics. Thus, MMA improves the risk profile of each drug while providing synergistic pain control using different drug classes. Postoperative MMA may include psychotherapy, physical therapy, NSAIDs, paracetamol**, gabapentinoids (ATC group code N02BF), regional analgesia (single injection or placement of peripheral nerve catheters), local injections, and opioids [181, 196].

In modern scientific literature, authors emphasize the use of the lowest effective doses of opioids for the shortest possible duration, avoiding extended-release opioids. As an adjuvant during MMA in adult patients, a single intravenous administration of #dexamethasone** 1.25–20 mg can be used before surgery (60 minutes prior to incision), which provides a significant reduction in pain [180].

It must be kept in mind that the duration of parenteral administration of most NSAIDs from the ATC group M01A "Anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products, non-steroids" (ketorolac**, ketoprofen**, diclofenac**) is limited to two days in accordance with the instructions for medical use, which requires timely switching of the patient to oral administration, changing the drug, or approving further use with the medical commission. The specific choice of local anesthesia method and medicinal products is made by the attending physician individually, in accordance with the patient's characteristics, local protocols, and the equipment of the medical organization.

When prescribing analgesic therapy for children, a single dose should be chosen taking into account the child's weight and age. Preference should be given to analgesics with oral or rectal administration routes, avoiding intramuscular injections.

It is recommended to perform local block or regional anesthesia as part of the postoperative multimodal regimen [181, 197].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Recommended analgesics from group N02 Analgesics are listed in Appendices A3.3 and A3.4.

3.3.4 Postoperative management of patients with NMD

Recommended:

– Monitoring in the ICU in the postoperative period for all patients with neuromuscular diseases, regardless of the extent of surgery and duration of anesthesia [104].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: transfer to the ICU after surgery should be considered for any patient at risk of respiratory complications. ICU capabilities allow for comprehensive cardiovascular and respiratory monitoring, as well as multi-component therapy, including non-invasive ventilation (NIV), use of cough assist devices, or airway secretion aspiration.

  • – Adequate analgesia is a critical component of postoperative management in patients with neuromuscular diseases. The depth of analgesia should be tailored to minimize respiratory center depression. Opioid analgesics carry an additional risk of respiratory depression. A safe and effective method of pain relief in this scenario is epidural analgesia as part of multimodal analgesia [105, 178, 179, 202].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: timely prevention and relief of pain syndrome prevent the development of secondary hypoventilation due to muscle rigidity following thoracic, upper abdominal, or spinal surgeries. The dose of administered opioids must provide adequate analgesia without suppressing the cough reflex and spontaneous breathing.

  • – For adequate analgesia in patients with spinal deformities following surgical treatment, it is recommended to use multimodal analgesia, which may include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (ATC group code: M01A), paracetamol**, gabapentinoids (ATC group code: N02BF), and immediate-release opioids, taking into account age restrictions in the instructions for medical use; if its prescription is not possible, monomodal analgesia should be used [180, 181, 182].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: it is necessary to ensure adequate pain relief for the patient prior to any manipulations and throughout the entire treatment period, the duration of which varies significantly depending on the chosen patient management strategy. When providing pain management in an inpatient setting, prescriptions made during the emergency medical care stage must be taken into account.

– Among pharmacological strategies, the current consensus is the use of multimodal analgesia (MMA), which involves the combination of several analgesic drugs (opioid and non-opioid) with different mechanisms of action and non-pharmacological interventions aimed at targeting the peripheral and/or central parts of the nervous system [183]. This combination allows for more effective pain relief by enhancing the effects of various drugs, which in most cases leads to a reduction in the frequency of prescriptions and/or doses of opioid analgesics. Thus, MMA improves the risk profile of each drug while providing synergistic pain control using different drug classes. Postoperative MMA may include psychotherapy, physical therapy, NSAIDs, paracetamol**, gabapentinoids, regional anesthesia (single injection or placement of peripheral nerve catheters), local injections, and opioids [184].

– When prescribing analgesic therapy in children, a single dose should be chosen taking into account the child's weight and age. Preference should be given to analgesics with oral or rectal administration routes, avoiding intramuscular injections. When choosing analgesics for multimodal analgesia, it should be taken into account that perioperative use of #pregabalin 2 mg/kg twice daily** in children with posterior instrumented spinal fusion does not reduce postoperative opioid consumption [185].

3.3.5 Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolic complications

It is recommended that all adult patients be considered for pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with low-molecular-weight heparins from the heparin group (ATC code B01AB) during elective spinal surgery in cases where the risk of VTE outweighs the risk of bleeding, taking into account the patient's individual characteristics and surgical factors (major prolonged surgery, surgery with a combined anteroposterior approach), as well as in accordance with the clinical assessment performed by the attending physician [186, 187, 196].

GGR BLoE 2Recommendation Grade B (Level of Evidence – 2)

Comments: to assess the individual risk of VTE development, it is advisable to use the Caprini scale (Appendix G9).

  • In adult patients at high risk of bleeding, it is recommended to use mechanical thromboprophylaxis before surgery, and the first administration of a low-molecular-weight heparin from the heparin group (ATC code B01AB) should be delayed until hemostasis is achieved (12–24 hours after surgery) [194, 195, 188].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • If a patient is admitted with restricted mobility, including due to hemi- and tetraparesis/-paralysis, it is recommended to initiate pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in the preoperative period [189].

GGR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • When performing pharmacological VTE prophylaxis in children, it is recommended to consider the use of #enoxaparin sodium** (for age under 2 months: 0.75 mg/kg every 12 h, older than 2 months: 0.5 mg/kg every 12 h) or heparin sodium** [191, 184].

GGR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: In pediatric practice, there is no standardized and validated risk assessment tool for thromboprophylaxis [190].

  • Children are recommended to undergo mechanical thromboprophylaxis [204].

GGR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to use ventilator weaning and tracheal extubation protocols in intensive care units for critically ill patients with mandatory CO2 monitoring. Prolonged mechanical ventilation may be necessary after surgery, and in some circumstances, tracheostomy may be required. Extubation and transition to non-invasive ventilation (NIV) should always be planned as an interim stage for returning to the preoperative respiratory support system. Atelectasis, hypoventilation, and stagnation of bronchopulmonary secretions can cause hypoxemia. Additional oxygenation should be administered with caution: it should be borne in mind that hypercapnia may be missed and, accordingly, treatment of its causes started later. Do not use oxygen without NIV and only under acid-base balance monitoring. [36, 39, 106, 107, 108].

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

Comments: tracheal extubation in patients with neuromuscular diseases is recommended to be performed with full control over bronchial secretion and achievement of normal or borderline SpO2 values in ambient air or against the background of NIV. When there is a high risk of respiratory complications, the use of a protocol based on a combination of non-invasive pulmonary ventilation with active cough augmentation methods is recommended.

It is recommended: for patients after surgical correction of spinal deformity in the early rehabilitation period (stages 1 and 2) to consider early extubation and respiratory support with a non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) device or a mechanical ventilator in CPAP mode (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure – a method for correcting sleep-related breathing pauses by creating a constant positive pressure in the airways) [93-108, 112-114].

GPP BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3).

Comments: CPAP therapy (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure) is a method for correcting sleep-related breathing pauses by creating a constant positive pressure in the airways.

It is recommended for bedridden patients with 5q SMA, DMD, myopathies, and myodystrophies with respiratory disorders after surgical correction of spinal deformity in the early rehabilitation period (stages 1 and 2) to use a mechanical insufflator-exsufflator to prevent pulmonary complications and hypoventilation [39, 111-114].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended for patients after surgical correction of spinal deformity in the early rehabilitation period (stages 1 and 2) to assess the efficacy of pain management [110, 112, 113].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: it is recommended in children older than 1 year to use epidural anesthesia with ropivacaine hydrochloride solution** 2 mg/1 ml injection solution administered via an infusion pump (infusion pump) (consensus of the clinical guideline authors). The main aspects of perioperative management of patients with neuromuscular diseases are detailed in the draft clinical guidelines of the All-Russian Public Organization «Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists» of Russia «Perioperative Management of Patients with Neuromuscular Diseases (Draft)» and in Appendix B2 [176].

It is recommended: for patients after surgical correction of spinal deformity in the early rehabilitation period (stages 1 and 2) to perform early verticalization in a sitting position [95, 96, 113].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended: for patients after surgical correction of spinal deformity in the early rehabilitation period (stages 1 and 2) to perform CT of the thoracic and lumbar spine and chest to monitor implant positioning and assess lung status [95, 96].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended: for patients with contraindications to bracing and surgical correction of spinal deformity to consider the selection of custom modular wheelchairs within the concept of postural management [95, 96, 111, 118, 119].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: custom-made seating inserts (molded seating systems) with the ability to be attached to a wheelchair base can be used as an alternative to custom modular wheelchairs.

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

  • Patients with neuromuscular scoliosis are recommended a comprehensive set of medical rehabilitation methods for patients with musculoskeletal disorders, aimed at improving motor functions (especially maintaining trunk posture and mobility in a wheelchair), improving respiratory function and exercise tolerance, preventing pain caused by spasticity and/or rib impingement on the iliac crest, improving self-care, and other daily living functions [121, 122].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended for the purpose of improving functioning in all patients with neuromuscular scoliosis receiving conservative and/or surgical treatment to undergo medical rehabilitation at all its stages, including physical exercises [49, 123-125]

LoR BQoE 1Level of Recommendation B (Quality of Evidence – 1),

bracing (only in conservative treatment) [32, 47, 48, 49, 53, 56, 57].

GCR CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

(see section "Conservative Treatment"), hydrokinesitherapy, massage, physiotherapy, and reflexology [49, 131].

GGR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: Bracing is recommended only in the absence of indications for surgical treatment and/or in the presence of limitations for surgical correction of scoliosis in children: BMI <12; osteopenia (Z-score <-3 SD) (see section "Conservative Treatment") [52, 53, 48, 56, 51, 55]. Bracing is not recommended in patients who have undergone surgical correction for neuromuscular scoliosis. With modern treatment methods, the use of braces is excessive and can negatively affect respiratory function, especially in the early postoperative period [122].

It is recommended to have an examination by a physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM) physician for all patients with neuromuscular scoliosis receiving conservative and/or surgical treatment to undergo medical rehabilitation at all its stages [32, 53, 47, 48, 49, 56, 57].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended to involve an occupational therapist (ergotherapist) during medical rehabilitation at all its stages to coordinate the set of physical exercises and the use of assistive technology [32, 53, 47, 48, 49, 56, 57, 171, 172] for the purpose of improving daily functioning.

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended for all patients with neuromuscular scoliosis during rehabilitation measures to formulate a rehabilitation diagnosis based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in order to optimize the rehabilitation program and increase the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation [143-147].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment: establishing a rehabilitation diagnosis using the ICF is central to rehabilitation planning [135-139].

It is recommended that all patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergo medical rehabilitation involving a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team (MDRT) specialists in order to improve activity, participation, and overall quality of life [122, 140-144].

GPR CLOC 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3).

  • Bracing is recommended only in the absence of indications for surgical treatment and/or in the presence of contraindications to surgical correction of scoliosis in children: BMI <12; osteopenia (Z-score <-3 SD) (see section "Conservative treatment") [52, 53, 48, 56, 51, 55].

GRL CLEL 4Recommendation Grade C (Level of Evidence – 4).

Bracing is not recommended in patients who have undergone surgical correction for neuromuscular scoliosis [122].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: with modern treatment methods, the use of braces is redundant and can negatively affect respiratory function, especially in the early postoperative period [122].

It is recommended that all patients with neuromuscular scoliosis continue physical exercises during brace-corrective treatment at all stages of medical rehabilitation in order to improve the functional state of muscles and psychological well-being [122, 125, 51, 145-147].

GCR BLOCE 2Level of recommendation validity B (Level of evidence – 2).

It is recommended that all patients with neuromuscular scoliosis, during conservative treatment and in the postoperative period at all stages of medical rehabilitation, undergo physical rehabilitation that includes regular physical exercise [125, 145, 146, 148, 149], Schroth method exercises [123] combined with spine stabilization exercises [123] in order to prevent scoliosis progression, improve activity and participation scores, and enhance quality of life [123].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: Physical exercise is beneficial for maintaining and improving exercise tolerance in patients with neuromuscular disorders. Physical exercise includes cardiovascular exercises, which can increase endurance and limit the likelihood of cardiopulmonary complications [145]. Exercises for training and strengthening the muscles involved in maintaining trunk balance and upper extremity manipulation also lead to a marked improvement in exercise tolerance and functional independence in some patients with neuromuscular diseases [147, 150, 151]. Physical rehabilitation does not have a significant impact on the progression of spinal deformity in patients with neuromuscular diseases, but it is effective in improving or maintaining active functioning. Therefore, during the non-surgical treatment period, continuous monitoring and assessment of progressive spinal deformity are important [125].

It is recommended that all wheelchair-bound patients with neuromuscular scoliosis use wheelchair seating inserts to prevent the worsening of spinal deformity, prevent pressure ulcers, and improve trunk support and functional activity [122, 139, 149, 58].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: the use of wheelchair seating inserts can be effective in preventing scoliosis progression, preventing pressure ulcer formation, and enhancing comfort while sitting [122, 58]. Wheelchair accessories may include various inserts, lateral chest supports, shoulder or lap safety belts, foot and neck supports, as well as pommels between the thighs [122]. A study by Holmes K.J. et al. [58] showed that the use of a 3-point lateral support pad system provided a more symmetrical trunk position and reduced the severity of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy.

It is recommended that all patients who have undergone surgical correction for neuromuscular scoliosis mobilize in a wheelchair starting from days 2–5 postoperatively [2, 36, 37].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: due to the change in sitting posture, the wheelchair requires adaptation. Care should be taken to ensure that wheelchair adaptation procedures are initiated in a timely manner under the supervision of an occupational therapist. The wheelchair must be adapted in such a way as to ensure maximum comfort and balance of the trunk and head in the sitting position [122].

It is recommended that all patients who have undergone surgical correction for neuromuscular scoliosis receive respiratory tract infection and pressure ulcer prevention, wound care, nutritional support, and symptomatic pain management [122, 153, 154].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended that all patients who have undergone surgical correction for neuromuscular scoliosis avoid trunk flexion and rotation, and hip flexion greater than 90° during the early, late, and long-term postoperative periods for up to 9 months at all stages of medical rehabilitation [122].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: due to the fact that bone fusion healing after surgery takes from 3 to 9 months, trunk flexion and rotation, as well as hip flexion greater than 90°, are not permitted during this period [122].

It is recommended that all patients who have undergone surgical correction for neuromuscular scoliosis use an adjustable tilt table in the early postoperative period [122].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended that prior to discharge from the surgical hospital, all patients who have undergone surgical correction for neuromuscular scoliosis be provided with instructions on transitioning from lying to sitting and on maintaining a sitting position [122].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended that for all patients who have undergone surgical correction for neuromuscular scoliosis and who require medical rehabilitation in a day hospital or outpatient setting, in the presence of factors limiting the patient's ability to receive such medical rehabilitation (including cases where the patient resides in a locality remote from the medical organization, or has mobility limitations), medical rehabilitation be organized at home, including through the use of telemedicine information and communication systems [122].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: home-based medical rehabilitation is organized by the medical organization to which the patient is attached for primary health care. During home-based medical rehabilitation, video demonstrations of correct physical exercises at home may be provided [122].

It is recommended that all patients older than 2 years with neuromuscular scoliosis in the presence of spasticity receive botulinum toxin type A** [121, 155-157] (see section "Conservative treatment").

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: data on the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A are mixed. Nuzzo RM. et al. [155] reported that botulinum toxin type A** injections in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis due to cerebral palsy who needed to delay surgery increased the efficacy of subsequent surgical treatment and halted scoliosis progression. Kotwicki T. et al. [121] noted the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A** in reducing pain severity developing secondary to spasticity.

Conversely, a prospective, randomized, triple-blind study did not demonstrate the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A** in reducing radiological and clinical manifestations of scoliosis in children with cerebral palsy, apart from an initial subjective yet positive evaluation of the effect by the patients' parents [158]. Su YC et al. [159] in a systematic review with meta-analysis were unable to draw a definitive conclusion regarding the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A** in patients with neuromuscular scoliosis due to high heterogeneity of results among studies and a small sample size. More randomized controlled trials with appropriate target muscle selection and standardized outcome assessment should be conducted to study the efficacy of botulinum toxin type A** in the treatment of scoliosis [159].

It is recommended that all patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergo physical therapy at all stages of medical rehabilitation in the absence of contraindications. Several studies have noted the efficacy of electrical stimulation, magnetotherapy, low-frequency electrostatic fields, and diadynamic electrical nerve stimulation in neuromuscular scoliosis [160-163].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended that all patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergo hydrokinesitherapy at the second and third stages of medical rehabilitation in order to improve activity and participation scores, respiratory function, and quality of life [161, 164-169].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: some studies recommend hydrokinesiotherapy, which includes various types of exercises, aerobics (stretching, strength exercises, and stability training), in warm (above 30 °C) shallow water (chest-deep) [165, 166].

It is recommended that all patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergo manual therapy during the second and third stages of medical rehabilitation in order to reduce the severity of scoliosis and pain syndrome [161, 168, 169].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: a study by M.R. Shaimurzhin et al. [168] demonstrated the effectiveness of manual therapy (mobilization and post-isometric relaxation techniques) in slowing the progression of motor impairments and the severity of scoliotic spinal deformity in children with SMA.

It is recommended that all patients with neuromuscular scoliosis receive massage for spinal disorders, collar-zone massage, segmental massage of the cervicothoracic and lumbosacral spine at all stages of medical rehabilitation in order to prevent the progression of spinal deformity and improve quality of life [161, 170].

For children – Grade of recommendation C (Level of evidence – 5)

For adults – Grade of recommendation B (Level of evidence – 3)

It is recommended that all patients with neuromuscular scoliosis undergo psychological counseling, psychological prevention, and, if necessary, psychocorrection at all stages of medical rehabilitation [171].

GRL CLEL 4Recommendation Grade C (Level of Evidence – 4).

It is recommended that pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis receive reflexology in order to improve functional activity and prevent the progression of scoliosis [173, 174]. There is no evidence base for the use of this treatment method in adults.

GCR BLEL 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1).

Comments: according to a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of acupuncture in patients with cerebral palsy, acupuncture combined with physical rehabilitation had a positive effect on gross motor skills, reduced spasticity, and improved daily activities [174].

  • Sanatorium-resort treatment is recommended for pediatric patients with neuromuscular scoliosis and may include physical exercises, massage, balneotherapy, and various physiotherapy methods [161, 175].

GRL CLEL 4Recommendation Grade C (Level of Evidence – 4).

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

  • All patients with orthopedic pathology and NMD are recommended to undergo dispensary follow-up by an orthopedic traumatologist [32].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Methods for preventing the development of neuromuscular scoliosis include the use of orthosis/bracing therapy and assistive rehabilitation devices (ARDs), as well as informing risk groups (patients with NMD) about measures to prevent secondary orthopedic complications.

The period of dispensary follow-up for patients with orthopedic complications of NMD is indefinite. The main monitoring methods are clinical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging studies. The criterion for effective treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis is an improvement in the clinical and imaging manifestations of the disease. Imaging criteria for deformity control during conservative treatment include: no progression of deformity within 20° Cobb, no increase in pelvic obliquity, and improvement in bone mineral density according to X-ray densitometry, which usually becomes apparent 6–8 months after the start of treatment. For patients who have undergone surgical treatment, the imaging signs of efficacy include preservation of deformity correction, absence of signs of spinal deformity progression and hardware instability, absence of peri-implant resorption, and the presence of signs of bone block formation (vertebrae) in the fixation zone.

During the first 6 months after surgery, patients are evaluated by an orthopedic traumatologist and a neurologist every 3 months. In the absence of clinical and imaging signs of disease progression or complications, radiography of the thoracic and lumbar spine is performed at 3 and 6 months, and spinal CT at 12 months.

Follow-up MRI or additional CT is performed in patients with signs of neurological impairment, persistent clinical activity, and to address the issue of subsequent targeted therapy with the possibility of intrathecal administration.

If complications are present, the patient continues follow-up/treatment with relevant specialists:

– with an orthopedic traumatologist, surgeon, or neurosurgeon – in the presence of fistulas, instability, and spinal deformity. If these complications can be eliminated, surgical treatment is performed in specialized departments/centers of spinal surgery with the patient's consent and after informing them of the relevant surgical risks;

– with a neurologist, urologist, or physical medicine and rehabilitation physician – in case of manifestations of myelo-/radiculopathy;

– with an endocrinologist – in the presence of osteoporosis;

– with a surgeon, plastic surgeon, or social workers – in case of irreversible neurological and neurotrophic disorders.

Patients with NMD remain under dispensary register (DR) with a neurologist and an orthopedic traumatologist for three years after surgery.

6. Organization of Medical Care

Surgical care for patients with neuromuscular scoliosis is provided as part of high-tech medical care in an inpatient setting. Conservative treatment, depending on the severity of clinical manifestations and the complexity of the devices, can be carried out either on an outpatient basis or in a specialized inpatient facility (neurological or rehabilitation bed profile).

Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization are:

  1. presence of indications for surgical treatment of NMS;

  2. development of neurological complications of NMS;

  3. vertebrogenic pain syndrome refractory to conservative methods;

  4. development of spinal hardware instability with the risk of soft tissue damage, including cases accompanied by pain syndrome and spinal deformity impairing the patient's quality of life;

  5. chronically functioning fistula (present for more than 3 months).

Indications for patient discharge from the inpatient medical facility are:

  1. radiological evidence of maintained neuromuscular scoliosis correction;

  2. absence of signs of hardware instability;

  3. normalization of general laboratory parameters – Hb, ESR, leukocyte differential count;

  4. absence of signs of infectious and inflammatory changes in the surgical site;

  5. relief of vertebrogenic pain syndrome to levels that do not require prescription of injectable analgesics or are subjectively rated by the patient as no higher than 3 points on the VAS.

Further treatment of the patient with resolution or improvement of clinical manifestations of the underlying disease may be continued, taking into account indications, in an inpatient or outpatient setting, including specialized (neurological, rehabilitation) departments/centers, under the supervision of a surgeon and/or trauma surgeon / orthopedic surgeon.

7. Additional Information

Patient-oriented factors having a negative impact on treatment outcomes:

  1. somatic status of the patient, including the presence of acute and chronic diseases – obesity, respiratory failure; comorbid chronic inflammatory diseases of the urinary and respiratory systems, oral cavity, skin, and subcutaneous adipose tissue; diseases accompanied by neurotrophic disorders;

  2. osteoporosis;

  3. immunodeficiency states, including those caused by prior therapy (glucocorticoids, immunosuppression).

Disease-oriented factors having an adverse effect on the disease outcome:

  1. unfavorable course of the underlying disease with progressive muscle damage;

  2. development of secondary chest deformities.

Potentially adverse factors associated with disease treatment:

  1. in conservative treatment – development of severe soft tissue neurotrophic manifestations;

  2. in surgical treatment – unstable instrumental fixation and wound infection.

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

No.

Quality assessment criteria

Performance evaluation

1.

X-ray of the thoracic and lumbar spine was performed

Yes/No

2.

X-ray of the thoracic and lumbar spine was performed

Yes/No

3.

Pelvic X-ray was performed

Yes/No

4.

Computed tomography of the spine (one region) was performed (prior to surgical intervention)

Yes/No

5.

Surgical correction and fixation of spinal segments were performed (for scoliosis greater than 40° Cobb, or hyperkyphosis greater than 50° Cobb, or hyperlordosis greater than 50° Cobb, or global trunk imbalance in the frontal and/or sagittal plane, or rapid progression of scoliotic deformity (more than 5° per year), or ineffectiveness of conservative treatment

Yes/No

6.

A set of medical rehabilitation methods for a patient with a musculoskeletal system disorder was performed

Yes/No

7.

Follow-up by an orthopedic trauma surgeon was prescribed

Yes/No

References

Show references
  1. Brzustowicz L.M., Lehner T., Castilla L.H. et al. Genetic mapping of chronic childhood-onset spinal muscular atrophy to chromosome 5q11.2 – q13.3. Nature. 1990; 344: 540-541.

  2. Baklanov A.N., Kolesov S.V., Shavyrin I.A. Surgical treatment of severe neuromuscular scoliosis in patients suffering from spinal muscular atrophy. Hirurgia Pozvonochnika (Spine Surgery). 2011; (3): 31-37.

  3. Lonstein J. Neuromuscular spinal deformity // Weinstein S. The Pediatric Spine — Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams&Wilkins), 2001: 789-796.

  4. Brown J., Zeller J., Swank S. Surgical and functional results of spine fusion in spinal muscular atrophy. Spine. 1988; 14: 763-770.

  5. Granata C., Merlini L., Cervellati S. Long term results of spine surgery in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 1996; 6: 61-68.

  6. Kushel Yu.V. [The role of laminotomy and laminoplasty in reducing the incidence of postoperative kyphoscoliosis in children operated on for intramedullary tumors]. Voprosy neyrokhirurgii im. N.N. Burdenko. 2007; (4): 20-34. (In Russ.)

  7. Kolesov S.V. [Surgical treatment of severe postlaminectomy spinal deformities]. Hirurgija pozvonochnika (Spine Surgery). 2006; (2): 29-32. (In Russ.)

  8. Melnikov I.I. [Orthopedic correction of secondary spinal deformities in children and adolescents]: Cand. Diss. / Melnikov Ilya Ilyich. — Moscow, 2011. — 124 p. (In Russ.)

  9. Ouellet J. A., Arlet V. Neuromuscular scoliosis. Spinal Disorders. – Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008: 663-692.

  10. Madigan R.R., Wallace S.L. Scoliosis in the institutionalized cerebral palsy population. Spine. 1981; 6 (6): 583-590.

  11. Majd M. E., Muldowny D. S., Holt R. T. Natural history of scoliosis in the institutionalized adult cerebral palsy population. Spine. 1997; 22 (13): 1461-1466.

  12. McCarthy R. E. Management of neuromuscular scoliosis. Orthop. Clin. North Amer. 1999. 30 (3): 435-449.

  13. Mercuri E., Finkel R.S., Muntoni F. et al; SMA Care Group. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part 1: Recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, orthopedic and nutritional care. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018; 28(2): 103-115.

  14. Ogino S., Leonard D.G., Rennert H. et al. Genetic risk assessment in carrier testing for spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Med Genet. 2002; 110 P: 301-07.

  15. Prior T.W., Snyder P.J., Rink B.D. et al.: Newborn and carrier screening for spinal muscular atrophy. Am J Med Genet A. 2010; 152A: 1605-1607.

  16. Zabnenkova V.V., Dadali E.L., Spiridonova M.G., et al. Spinal muscular atrophy carrier frequency in Russian Federation. ASHG 2016; 2476W.

  17. Mercuri E, Bertini E, Iannaccone ST. Childhood spinal muscular atrophy: controversies and challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2012; 11(5): 443–52.

  18. Lunn MR, Wang CH. Spinal muscular atrophy. Lancet 2008; 371(9630): 2120–33.-4C.

  19. Jones-Quaidoo SM., Yang S, Arlet V. Surgical management of spinal deformities in cerebral palsy: A review. J. Neurosurg. Spine. 2010; 13(6): 672-685.

  20. Persson-Bunke M, Hägglund G, Lauge-Pedersen H, Wagner P, Westbom L (2012) Scoliosis in a total population of children with cerebral palsy. Spine. 37(12): E708-E713.

  21. Beckmann K, Lange T, Gosheger G, et al. Surgical correction of scoliosis in patients with severe cerebral palsy. Eur. Spine J. 2016; 25 (2): 506-516.

  22. Yazici M, Senaran H. Cerebral palsy and spinal deformities. Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc. 2009; 43 (2): 149-155.

  23. Hagglund G., Pettersson K., Czuba T. et al. Incidence of scoliosis in cerebral palsy. Acta Orthop. J. 2018; 89: 443–447.

  24. Gu Y, Shelton JE, Ketchum JM, et al. Natural history of scoliosis in non-ambulatory spastic tetraplegic cerebral palsy. PM R. 2011; 3(1): 27-32.

  25. Milbrandt T., Kunes J., Karol L. Friedreich’s ataxia and scoliosis: the experience at two institutions. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2008; 28(2): 234-238.

  26. Sussman M. Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Am Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2002; 10: 138–51.

  27. Smith AD, Koreska J, Moseley CF. Progression of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1989; 71: 1066–74.

  28. Alman BA, Raza SN, Biggar WD. Steroid treatment and the development of scoliosis in males with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J. Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 519–24.

  29. Yilmaz O, Karaduman, Topaloglu H. Prednisolone therapy in Duchenne muscular dystrophy prolongs ambulation and prevents scoliosis. Eur J. Neurol. 2004; 11: 541–44.

  30. Talim B, Malaguti C, Gnudi S, et al. Vertebral compression in Duchenne muscular dystrophy following deflazacort. Neuromuscul. Disord 2002; 12: 294–95.

  31. Bothwell JE, Gordon KE, Dooley JM, et al. Vertebral fractures in boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin. Pediatr 2003; 42: 353–56.

  32. Mikhailovsky M.V., Fomichev N.G. [Surgery of Spinal Deformities]. – Novosibirsk: Redactio, 2011. 592 p. (In Russ.)

  33. Hart D, McDonald C Spinal deformity in progressive neuromuscular disease. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Am. 1998; 9 (1): :213-32.

  34. Strauss DJ, Shavelle RMLife expectancy of adults with cerebral palsy. Dev. Med Child Neurol. 1998; 40: 369–375.

  35. Racca F, Del Sorbo L, Mongini T, et al. Respiratory management of acute respiratory failure in neuromuscular diseases. Minerva Anestesiol 2010; 76: 51-62.

  36. Racca F, Mongini , Wolfler A, et al. Recommendations for anesthesia and perioperative management of patients with neuromuscular disorders. Minerva Anestesiol. 2013; 79 (4): 419-33.

  37. Bushby K., Finkel R., Birnkrant D.J. et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 1: diagnosis, and pharmacological and psychosocial management. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 77-93.

  38. Vai S., Bianchi M.L., Moroni I. et al. Bone and Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Bone. 2015; 79: 116-20.

  39. Trucco F., Pedemonte M., Fiorillo C. et al. Detection of early nocturnal hypoventilation in neuromuscular disorders. J Int Med Res. 2018; 46(3): 1153-1161.

  40. Brogna C., Cristiano L., Verdolotti T. et al. MRI patterns of muscle involvement in type 2 and 3 spinal muscular atrophy patients. J Neurol. 2020; 267 (4): 898-912.

  41. Verrillo E., Pavone M., BruniO. Et al. Sleep architecture in children with spinal muscular atrophy type 2. Sleep Med. 2016; 20: 1-4.

  42. Racca F., Del Sorbo L., Mongini T. et al. Respiratory management of acute respiratory failure in neuromuscular diseases. Minerva Anestesiol. 2010; 76: 51-62.

  43. Richa FC. Anaesthetic management of a patient with limb-girdle muscular dystrophy for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur. J.Anaesthesiol 2011; 28:72-3.

  44. Cardiovascular health supervision for individuals affected by Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy. Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery. Pediatrics 2005;116;1569‐1573.

  45. Graham RJ, Athiraman U, Laubach AE, Sethna NF. Anesthesia and perioperative medical management of children with spinal muscular atrophy. Paediatr. Anaesth 2009;19:1054-63.

  46. Zalneraitis E.L., Halperin J.J., Grunnet M.L. et al. Muscle biopsy and the clinical course of infantile spinal muscular atrophy. J. Child Neurol. 1991; 6(4): 324-8.

  47. Fujak A., Kopschina C., Forst R. et al. Use of orthoses and orthopaedic technical devices in proximal spinal muscular atrophy. Results of survey in 194 CMA patients. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist Technol 2011; 6(4): 305–11.

  48. Catteruccia M., Vuillerot C., Vaugier I. et al. Orthopedic management of scoliosis by Garches Brace and spinal fusion in CMA type 2 children. J. Neuromusc. Dis 2015; 2(4): 453–62.

  49. Mercuri E. et al. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part 1: Recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, orthopedic and nutritional care Neuromusc. Disord. 2018; 28 (2): 103-115.

  50. Mejabi J.O., Sergeenko O.M., Ryabykh S.O. Correction using Halo Gravity Traction for severe rigid neuromuscular scoliosis: a report of three cases. Malaysian Orthop. J. 2019; 13(1).

  51. Mesfin A, Sponseller PD, Leet AI. Spinal muscular atrophy: manifestations and management. JAmAcadOrthopSurg 2012;20(6): 393–401.

  52. Leopando M.T., Moussavi Z., Holbrow J. et al. Effect of a Soft Boston Orthosis on pulmonary mechanics in severe cerebral palsy. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 1999; 28: 53-58.

  53. Terjesen T., Lange J.E., Steen H. Treatment of scoliosis with spinal bracing in quadriplegic cerebral palsy. Developmental Med. Child Neurol. 2000; 42: 448-454.

  54. Miller A., Temple T. Miller F. Impact of orthoses on the rate of scoliosis progression in children with cerebral palsy. J. Pediat. Orthop. 1996; 16: 332-335.

  55. Olafsson Y., Saraste H., Al-Dabbagh Z. Brace treatment in neuromuscular spine deformity. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 1999; 19: 376–379.

  56. Nakamura N., Uesugi M., Inaba Y. et al. Use of dynamic spinal brace in the management of neuromuscular scoliosis: a preliminary report. J. Pediatr. Orthop. B. 2014; 23(3): 291-298.

  57. Pettersson K., Rodby-Bousquet E. Prevalence and goal attainment with spinal orthoses for children with cerebral palsy. J. Pediatr. Rehab. Med. 2019; 12(2): 197–203.

  58. Holmes K.J., Michael S.M., Thorpe S.L., Solomonidis S.E. Management of scoliosis with special seating for the non-ambulant spastic cerebral palsy population. A biomechanical study. Clin. Biomechanics. 2003; 18: 480-487.

  59. Nuzzo R.M., Walsh S., Boucherit T., Massood S. Counter paralysis for treatment of paralytic scoliosis with botulinum toxin type A. Amer. J. Orthop. 1997; 26:201-207.

  60. Yazici M., Senaran H. Cerebral palsy and spinal deformities. Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc. 2009; 43 (2): 149-155.

  61. Tsirikos A.I. Development and treatment of spinal deformity in patients with cerebral palsy. Indian J. Orthopaedics. 2010; 44 (2): 148.

  62. McCarthy J.J., D’Andrea L.P., Betz R.R., Clements D.H. Scoliosis in the child with cerebral palsy. J. Amer. Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2006; 14: 367–375.

  63. Lipton G.E., Miller F., Dabney K.W. et al. Factors predicting postoperative complications following spinal fusions in children with cerebral palsy. J. Spinal Disord. 1999; 12: 197–205.

  64. Hasler C.C. Operative treatment for spinal deformities in cerebral palsy. J. Children's orthop. 2013; 7(5): 419-423.

  65. Phillips D.P., Roye Jr D.P., Farcy J.P. et al. Surgical treatment of scoliosis in a spinal muscular atrophy population. Spine. 1990; 15(9): 942-945.

  66. Sussman M. Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J. Am. Acad. Orthop, Surg. 2002; 10: 138–51.

  67. Velasco MV, Colin AA, Zurakowski D, et al. Posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy diminishes the rate of respiratory decline. Spine 2007; 32: 459–65.

  68. Alman B.A., Kim H.K.W. Pelvic obliquity after fusion of the spine in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81: 821– 24.

  69. Sengupta DK, Mehdian SH, McConnell JR, et al. Pelvic or lumbar fixation for the surgical management of scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Spine. 2002; 27: 2072–79.

  70. Bushby K., Finkel R., Birnkrant D. J. et al. Diagnosis and management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy, part 2: implementation of multidisciplinary care. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9 (2): 177-189.

  71. Fujak A., Raab W., Schuh A. et al. Operative treatment of scoliosis in proximal spinal muscular atrophy: results of 41 patients. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2012; 132 (12): 1697–706.

  72. Jones-Quaidoo S.M., Yang S., Arlet V. Surgical management of spinal deformities in cerebral palsy: A review. J. Neurosurg.: Spine. (2010) 13 (6): 672-685.

  73. SussmanM. Duchenne muscular dystrophy. J Am Acad. Orthop Surg. 2002; 10: 138–51

  74. Shapiro F., Sethna N., Colan S. et al. Spinal fusion in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a multidisciplinary approach. Muscle Nerve. 1992; 15: 604–14.

  75. Heller KD, Wirtz DC, Siebert CH, Forst R. Spinal stabilization in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: principles of treatment and record of 31 operative treated cases. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 2001; 10: 18–24.

  76. Wang C.H., Finkel R.S., Bertini E.S. et al. Consensus statement for standard of care in spinal muscular atrophy. J. Child Neurol 2007;22(8):1027–49.

  77. Mesfin A., Sponseller P.D., Leet A.I. Spinal muscular atrophy: manifestations and management. J. Am Acad. Orthop. Surg. 2012; 20 (6): 393–401.

  78. Sponseller PD, Yang JS, Thompson GH. et al. Pelvic fixation of growing rods: comparison of constructs. Spine 2009; 34 (16): 1706–10.

  79. McElroy MJ, Shaner AC, Crawford TO, Thompson GH, Kadakia RV, Akbarnia BA, et al. Growing rods for scoliosis in spinal muscular atrophy: structural effects, complications, and hospital stays. Spine 2011;36(16):1305–11.

  80. Chandran S, McCarthy J, Noonan K, et al. Early treatment of scoliosis with growing rods in children with severe spinal muscular atrophy: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop 2011; 31 (4): 450–4.

  81. Anari J.B., Spiegel D.A., Baldwin K.D. Neuromuscular scoliosis and pelvic fixation in 2015: where do we stand? World J. Orthop 2015; 6(8): 564–6.

  82. Odent T., Ilharreborde B., Miladi L. et al. Fusionless surgery in early-onset scoliosis. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2015; 101(6 Suppl.): S281–8.

  83. McElroy MJ. et al. Growing rods for the treatment of scoliosis in children with cerebral palsy: a critical assessment. Spine. 2012; 37(24): E1504-E1510.

  84. Livingston K., Zurakowski D., Snyder B., Growing Spine Study Group, Children’s Spine Study Group. Parasol rib deformity in hypotonic neuromuscular scoliosis: a new radiographical definition and a comparison of short-term treatment outcomes with VEPTR and growing rods. Spine 2015; 40(13): E780–6.

  85. Mercuri E. et al. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part 1: Recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, orthopedic and nutritional care. Neuromusc. Disord. 2018; 28 (2): 103-115.

  86. Molotkov Yu.V., Ryabykh S.O., Filatov E.Yu. et al. [Treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a systematic literature review]. Hirurgija pozvonochnika (Spine Surgery). 2023. 20 (2): 6-20. (In Russ.)

  87. Schurova E.N., Saifutdinov M.S., Ryabykh S.O. [The state of temperature and pain sensitivity as a marker of the risk level of neurological complications during surgical correction of severe spinal deformities]. Pediatric Traumatology, Orthopaedics and Reconstructive Surgery. 2017; 5 (4): 5-15. (In Russ.)

  88. Ryabykh S.O., Savin D.M., Saifutdinov M.S. [Formalization of the results of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord motor pathways during surgical correction]. Vestnik Khirurgii imeni I.I. Grekova. 2018; 177 (1): 49-53. (In Russ.)

  89. Saifutdinov M.S., Ryabykh S.O. [Neurophysiological monitoring of the functional state of the pyramidal system during the treatment of patients with spinal deformity]. Neurological Journal. 2018; 23 (5): 248-258. (In Russ.)

  90. Eichhorn J.H., Cooper J.B., Cullen D.J. et al. Standards of patient monitoring during anesthesia at Harvard Medical School. J Am Med Ass. 1986; 256: 1017-1020.

  91. Arestova Yu.S., Saifutdinov M.S., Savin D.M. et al. [The significance of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during surgical correction of scoliosis for the postoperative recovery of the patient's motor function]. Modern Technologies in Medicine. 2021; 13 (5): 55-61. (In Russ.)

  92. Filatov E., Sergeenko O., Savin D. et al. The etiological understanding of spine deformities in patients with neuromuscular disorders. J Ortho Sci Res. 2022; 3(2): 1-12.

  93. Vianello A., Arcaro G., Braccioni F. et al. Prevention of extubation failure in high risk patients with neuromuscular disease. J Crit Care 2011; 26:517-24.

  94. Birnkrant DJ. The American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the respiratory and related management of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy undergoing anesthesia or sedation. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (Suppl 4): S242-4.

  95. Rubino FA. Perioperative management of patients with neurologic disease. Neurol. Clin 2004; 22: 261-76.

  96. Finkel R.S., Mercuri E., Meyer O.H. et al. SMA Care group. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscul aratrophy: Part 2: Pulmonary and acute care; medications, supplements and immunizations; other organ systems; and ethics. Neuromuscul Disord. 2018; 28(3): 197-207.

  97. Cardiovascular health supervision for individuals affected by Duchenne or Becker muscular dystrophy. Section on Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery. Pediatrics 2005;116;1569 ‐1573.

  98. Muenster T, Mueller C, Forst J, Huber H, Schmitt HJ. Anaesthetic management in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy undergoing orthopaedic surgery: a review of 232 cases. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2012; 29: 489-94.

  99. Yong SL, Marik P, Esposito M, Coulthard P. Supplemental perioperative steroids for surgical patients with adrenal insufficiency. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 (4): CD005367.

  100. Ames WA, Hayes JA, Crawford MW. The role of corticosteroids in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a review for the anesthetist. PaediatrAnaesth 2005; 15: 3-8.

  101. Marik PE, Varon J. Requirement of perioperative stress doses of corticosteroids: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Surg. 2008; 143 (12): 1222-6.

  102. Troianos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, et al. Special articles: guidelines for performing ultrasound guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. AnesthAnalg 2012; 114: 46-72.

  103. Klingler W, Lehmann-Horn F, Jurkat-Rott K. Complications of anaesthesia in neuromuscular disorders. NeuromusculDisord 2005; 15: 195-206.

  104. Birnkrant DJ, Panitch HB, Benditt JO, et al. American College of Chest Physicians consensus statement on the respiratory and related management of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy undergoing anesthesia or sedation. Chest 2007; 132: 1977-86.

  105. Niranjan V, Bach JR. Noninvasive management of pediatric neuromuscular ventilatory failure. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 2061-5.

  106. Ruscic KJ, Grabitz SD, Rudolph MI, Eikermann M. Prevention of respiratory complications of the surgical patient: actionable plan for continued process improvement. Curr. Opin. Anaesthesiol. 2017; 30 (3): 399-408.

  107. Almenrader N, Patel D. Spinal fusion surgery in children with non-idiopathic scoliosis: is there a need for routine postoperative ventilation? Br J Anaesth 2006; 97: 851-7.

  108. Marchant WA, Fox R. Postoperative use of a cough-assist device in avoiding prolonged intubation. Br J Anaesth 2002; 89: 644-7.

  109. Trucco F., Pedemonte M., Fiorillo C., et al. Detection of early nocturnal hypoventilation in neuromuscular disorders. J Int Med Res. 2018; 46(3): 1153-1161.

  110. Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011; 63 Suppl 11: S 240–252.

  111. Hart D, McDonald C Spinal deformity in progressive neuromuscular disease. Phys Med Rehab Clin North Am 9 (1), Global Polio Eradication Initiative Strategic Plan (2004) Centers for disease. MMWR MorbMortal Wkly Rep. 1998; 53(5): 107–8.

  112. Proximal spinal muscular atrophy 5q, clinical guidelines rubricator of the Russian Ministry of Health, 2023 [https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/593_3] (In Russ.)

  113. Zabolotskikh I.B., Belkin A.A., Butrov A.V. et al. [Perioperative management of patients with neuromuscular diseases]. Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya. 2019; (1): 6-26. (In Russ.)

  114. Perioperative management of patients with neuromuscular diseases. Clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, Approval year: 2022. (In Russ.)

  115. Revised upper limb module for SMA: RULM SMAReach. 21.01.2019. Available at: https://www.treatsma.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/RULM-SMAREACH-06_02_2019.pdf

  116. Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE). Evaluation sheets. 2019. Available at: https://ormiz.ru/adm/files/janssen/HFMSE2.pdf (In Russ.)

  117. Berarda C., Payan C., Hodgkinsona I., Fermanian J. The MFM Collaborative Study Group A motor function measure scale for neuromuscular diseases. Construction and validation study. Neuromuscular Disord. 2005; 15: 463–470.

  118. Ryabykh S.O., Savin D.M., Filatov E.Yu. et al. [Spinal muscular atrophy: clinical features and treatment of spinal and limb deformities. Interstate consensus protocol]. Hirurgija pozvonochnika (Spine Surgery). 2020; 17 (2): 79–94. (In Russ.)

  119. Kutsev S.I., Nikitin S.S., Ryabykh S.O., et al. [Spinal muscular atrophy 5q. Multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with confirmed diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy 5q. Teaching aid]. Moscow. 2022. (In Russ.)

  120. Palisano R. et al. Development and reliability of a system to classify gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1997; 39 (4): 214-223.

  121. Kotwicki T, Jozwiak M. Conservative management of neuromuscular scoliosis: personal experience and review of literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2008; 30(10):792-8.

  122. Mullender M, Blom N, De Kleuver M, et al. A Dutch guideline for the treatment of scoliosis in neuromuscular disorders. Scoliosis. 2008; 3:14.

  123. Weiss HR. The method of Katharina Schroth - history, principles and current development. Scoliosis. 2011; 6: 17.

  124. Gou Y, Lei H, Zeng Y, et al. The effect of Pilates exercise training for scoliosis on improving spinal deformity and quality of life: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100 (39):e27254.

  125. Berven S, Bradford DS. Neuromuscular scoliosis: causes of deformity and principles for evaluation and management. Semin Neurol. 2002 Jun;22(2):167-78.

  126. Mercuri E. et al. Diagnosis and management of spinal muscular atrophy: Part 1: Recommendations for diagnosis, rehabilitation, orthopedic and nutritional care. Neuromuscul. Disord. Elsevier, 2018; 28 (2): 103–115.

  127. Fujak A, Kopschina C, Forst R, et al. Use of orthoses and orthopaedic technical devices in proximal spinal muscular atrophy. Results of survey in 194 CMA patients. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2011;6(4):305-11.

  128. Catteruccia M, Vuillerot C, Vaugier I, et al. Orthopedic management of scoliosis by GarchesVrace and spinal fusion in CMA type 2 children. J Neuromuscul Dis 2015; 2(4):453-62.

  129. Nakamura N, Uesugi M, Inaba Y, et al. Use of dynamic spinal brace in the management of neuromuscular scoliosis: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2014; 23(3):291-8.

  130. Pettersson K, Rodby-Bousquet E Prevalence and goal attainment with spinal orthoses for children with cerebral palsy. J. Pediatr. Rehabil. Med. 2019; 12(2): 197-203.

  131. Wang HY, Kong YP. Effect of traditional Chinese medicine massage on the rehabilitation of spinal function in scoliosis patients undergoing 3D printing orthopedic surgery. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2022; 35(1): 33-7.

  132. Mesfin A, Sponseller PD, Leet A.I. Spinal muscular atrophy: manifestations and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2012; 20(6): 393-401.

  133. Miller A, Temple T, Miller F. Impact of orthoses on the rate of scoliosis progression in children with cerebral palsy. J. Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1996; 16: 332-335.

  134. Olafsson Y, Saraste H, Al-Dabbagh Z: Brace treatment in neuromuscular spine deformity. Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 1999; 19: 376-379.

  135. Trabacca A, Lucarelli E, Pacifico R, et al. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-Children and Youth as a framework for the management of spinal muscular atrophy in the era of gene therapy: a proof-of-concept study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2020; 56(2): 243-251.

  136. Sheiko G.E., Belova A.N., Kuznetsov A.N., et al. [Application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth in assessing rehabilitation measures in patients with cerebral palsy]. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020; 5 (99): 38-45. (In Russ.)

  137. Kennedy RA, Carroll K, McGinley JL, Paterson KL. Walking and weakness in children: a narrative review of gait and functional ambulation in paediatric neuromuscular disease. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020;13(1):10.

  138. Hsieh Y.L., Yang C.C., Sun S.H., et al. Effects of hippotherapy on body functions, activities and participation in children with cerebral palsy based on ICF-CY assessments. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2017; 39(17): 1703-1713.

  139. Angsupaisal M, Maathuis CG, Hadders-Algra M. Adaptive seating systems in children with severe cerebral palsy across International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth version domains: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol 2015; 57: 919-30.

  140. Loughenbury PR, Tsirikos AI. Current concepts in the treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis: clinical assessment, treatment options, and surgical outcomes. Bone Jt Open. 2022; 3(1):85-92.

  141. Menon D, Gonorazky HD, Dowling JJ, et al. Clinical profile and multidisciplinary needs of patients with neuromuscular disorders transitioning from paediatric to adult care. Neuromuscul Disord. 2022; 32(3):206-212.

  142. Accogli G, Ferrante C, Fanizza I, et al. Neuromuscular disorders and transition from pediatric to adult care in a multidisciplinary perspective: a narrative review of the scientific evidence and current debate. Acta Myol. 2022; 41(4):188-200.

  143. Mary P, Servais L, Vialle R. Neuromuscular diseases: Diagnosis and management. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(1S):S89-S95.

  144. Wong BL, Rybalsky I, Shellenbarger KC, et al. Long-Term outcome of interdisciplinary management of patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy receiving daily glucocorticoid treatment. J Pediatr. 2017; 182:296-303.e1.

  145. Kilmer D.D. The role of exercise in neuromuscular disease. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 1998; 9: 115–125.

  146. Montes J, Garber CE, Kramer SS, et al. Single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial of exercise in ambulatory spinal muscular atrophy: why are the results negative? J. Neuromuscul Dis. 2015; 2(4): 463-470.

  147. Ansved T. Muscle training in muscular dystrophies. Acta Physiol Scand 2001; 171: 359–366.

  148. Tsykunov M.B. [Medical rehabilitation for scoliotic deformities]. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2018; 86 (4): 75-91. (In Russ.)

  149. Hsu JD, Quinlivan R. Scoliosis in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Neuromuscul Disord. 2013; 23(8): 611-7.

  150. Albany K. Physical and occupational therapy considerations in adult patients receiving botulinum toxin injections for spasticity. Muscle Nerve 1997; 6 (Suppl.): S221–S231

  151. Agre J.C., Rodriquez A.A, Franke T.M. Strength, endurance, and work capacity after muscle strengthening exercise in post-polio subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997; 78: 681–686

  152. Holmes K.J., Michael S.M., Thorpe S.L. et al. Management of scoliosis with special seating for the non-ambulant spastic cerebral palsy population--a biomechanical study. Clin. Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003;18:480-7.

  153. Benson ER, Thomson JD, Smith BG, Banta JV. Results and morbidity in a consecutive series of patients undergoing spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine. 1998; 23: 2308–17.

  154. Cotton LA. Unit rod segmental spinal instrumentation for the treatment of neuromuscular scoliosis. Orthop Nurs. 1991; 10:17–23.

  155. Nuzzo R.M., Walsh S., Boucherit T., Massood S. Counterparalysis for treatment of paralytic scoliosis with botulinum toxin type A. Amer. J. Orthop. 1997; 26:201-207.

  156. Hoare BJ, Wallen MA, Imms C, et al. Botulinum toxin A as an adjunct to treatment in the management of the upper limb in children with spastic cerebral palsy (UPDATE). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(1):CD003469.

  157. Molenaers G, Fagard K, Van Campenhout A, et al. Botulinum toxin A treatment of the lower extremities in children with cerebral palsy. J Child Orthop 2013; 7: 383-7.

  158. Wong C, Pedersen SA, Kristensen BB, et al. The effect of botulinum toxin A injections in the spine muscles for cerebral palsy scoliosis, examined in a prospective, randomized triple-blinded study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40 (23): E1205-11.

  159. Su YC, Lin YC, Hsieh PC, et al. Effectiveness of botulinum neurotoxin in treatment of scoliosis among children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Children (Basel). 2022; 9 (10): 1505.

  160. Khan M.A., Podgornaya O.V., Tarasov N.I., et al. [Pulsed magnetic stimulation in the rehabilitation of children operated on for grade III-IV scoliosis]. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy, and Exercise Therapy. 2013; 90(2): 33–37. (In Russ.)

  161. Khan M.A., Pogonchenkova I.V., Vybornov D.Yu. et al. [Medical rehabilitation of children with scoliosis]. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy, and Exercise Therapy. 2022; 99(4): 57–66. (In Russ.)

  162. Ponomarenko G.N. [Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine: National Guidelines]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2016. (In Russ.)

  163. Talkovsky E.M., Vybornov D.Yu., Krestyashin V.M., et al. High intensity pulsed magnetic therapy and therapeutic exercises complex application in medical rehabilitation: prospective randomized comparative study of children with grade II scoliosis. Bull. Rehabil. Med. 2022; 21 (4): 88-96.

  164. Erokhina N.N. [Swimming as a means of prevention and treatment of scoliosis and other spinal diseases]. Problemy razvitiya fizicheskoy kul'tury i sporta v novom tysyacheletii. 2017; 1: 115-116. (In Russ.)

  165. Ogonowska-Slodownik A, de Lima AAR, Cordeiro L, et al. Aquatic therapy for persons with neuromuscular diseases - a scoping review. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2022;9(2):237-256.

  166. Plecash A.R., Leavitt B.R. Aqua-therapy for neurodegenerative disorders. J Huntingtons Dis. 2014; 3(1):5–11.

  167. Huguet-Rodríguez M., Arias-Buría J.L, Huguet-Rodríguez B. et al. Impact of aquatic exercise on respiratory outcomes and functional activities in children with neuromuscular disorders: findings from an open-label and prospective preliminary pilot study. Brain Sci. 2020; 10(7): 458.

  168. Shaymurzin M.R., Lutsky I.S., Evtushenko O.S., Efimenko M.V. [Possibilities of manual therapy in the correction of scoliosis in children with spinal muscular atrophies]. Universitetskaya klinika. 2020; 4(37): 20-25. (In Russ.)

  169. Wishart B.D., Kivlehan E. Neuromuscular Scoliosis: when, who, why and outcomes. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N Am. 2021;32(3):547-556.

  170. Makarova E.V., Kupreenko M.V. [Innovative technologies in the comprehensive rehabilitation of individuals with scoliosis]. Sovremennye zdorov'esberegayuschie tekhnologii. 2017; 4: 331-338. (In Russ.)

  171. Tones M., Moss N., Polly D.W. A review of quality of life and psychosocial issues in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31 (26): 3027-38.

  172. Reichel D., Schanz J. Developmental psychological aspects of scoliosis treatment. Pediatr Rehabil. 2003; 6 (3-4): 221-5.

  173. Li LX, Zhang MM, Zhang Y, He J. Acupuncture for cerebral palsy: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neural Regen Res. 2018 Jun;13(6):1107-1117.

  174. Kang X., Huang Y., Zheng Y. et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of Jingjin acupuncture therapy in the treatment of spastic cerebral palsy. Front Neurol. 2024; 15: 1358732.

  175. Golubova T.F., Lyubchik V.N., Kurganova A.V. [Comparative efficacy of sanatorium-resort rehabilitation treatment complexes for children with scoliotic disease]. Vestnik fizioterapii i kurortologii. 2018; 24(1): 56-63. (In Russ.)

  176. Zabolotskikh I.B. et al. [Perioperative management of patients with neuromuscular diseases (draft clinical guidelines of the Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists of Russia)]. Regional Anesthesia and Acute Pain Management. 2014; 8 (2): 58-75. (In Russ.)

  177. Bratzler D.W., Dellinger E.P., Olsen K.M. et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Amer. J. Health-System Pharm. 2013; 70 (3): 195–283

  178. Ukolov K.Yu., Aizenberg V.L., Kolesov S.V., Arzhakova N.I. [Anesthetic management of surgical treatment of spinal deformities in childhood]. Bulletin of Intensive Care. 2012; (2): 64-69. EDN: QBUAFR. (In Russ.)

  179. Niemi G, Breivik H. Adrenaline markedly improves thoracic epidural analgesia produced by a low-dose infusion of bupivacaine, fentanyl and adrenaline after major surgery. A randomised, double-blind, cross-over study with and without adrenaline. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Sep;42(8):897-909. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1998.tb05348.x. PMID: 9773133.

  180. Waldron N.H., Jones C.A., Gan T.J. et al. Impact of perioperative dexamethasone on postoperative analgesia and side-effects: systematic review and meta-analysis. Brit. J. Anaesthesia. 2013; 110 (2): 191–200.

  181. Wick E.C., Grant M.C., Wu C.L. Postoperative multimodal analgesia pain management with nonopioid analgesics and techniques: a review. JAMA Surg. 2017; 152 (7): 691.

  182. Doleman B., Mathiesen O., Sutton A.J. et al. Non-opioid analgesics for the prevention of chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Br. J. Anaesth. 2023; 130(6):719-728

  183. Hsu J.R. Mir H., Wally M.K., Seymour R.B.; Orthopaedic Trauma Association Musculoskeletal Pain Task Force. Clinical practice guidelines for pain management in acute musculoskeletal injury. J. Orthopaedic Trauma. 2019; 33 (5): e158–e182

  184. Lee S.K., Lee J.W., Choy W.S. Is multimodal analgesia as effective as postoperative patient-controlled analgesia following upper extremity surgery? Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2013; 99 (8): 895–901

  185. Helenius L.L., Oksanen H., Lastikka M. et al. Preemptive Pregabalin in children and adolescents undergoing posterior instrumented spinal fusion: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020; 102 (3): 205-212

  186. Mosenthal W.P., Landy D.C., Boyajian H.H., et al. Thromboprophylaxis in Spinal Surgery // Spine. 2018. Vol. 43, № 8. P. E474–E481.

  187. Shiqing W., Shengzhong M., Cheng Z., et al. Efficacy of low molecular weight heparin in spinal trauma patients after part concentrated screw surgery and its influence on blood parameters and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis. Med. Hypotheses. 2019. 132: 109330.

  188. Faraoni D., Comes R.F., Geerts W., et al. European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Neurosurgery. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2018; 35 (2): 90–95

  189. Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Health Care Providers, 3rd ed.: Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine. Top. Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil. 2016; 22 (3): 209–240

  190. UW Health. Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis – Pediatric – Inpatient – Consensus Care Guideline [Electronic resource]. 2023. URL: https://www.uwhealth.org/cckm/cpg/hematology-and-coagulation/Pediatric-VTE-PPX-Consensus-Care-GL---April-2023-Final.pdf (accessed: 07.01.2024).

  191. Lyle C.A., Sidonio R.F., Goldenberg N.A. New developments in pediatric venous thromboembolism and anticoagulation, including the target-specific oral anticoagulants // Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2015. Vol. 27, № 1. P. 18–25

  192. Opri F., Bianchini S., Nicoletti L., et al. Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Patients of Neonatal and Pediatric Age Undergoing Orthopedic and Hand Surgery: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study // Antibiotics. 2022. Vol. 11, № 3. P. 289.

  193. Vlasova A. V., Smirnova E. V., Tenovskaya T. A., et al. Protocol of perioperative and postexposure antibiotic prophylaxis at Morozov City Children's Clinical Hospital // Zdorov'e Megapolisa. 2021. Vol. 2, № 2. P. 46–64.

  194. Frizzell K.H., Cavanaugh P.K., Herman M.J. Pediatric Perioperative Pain Management // Orthop. Clin. North Am. 2017. Vol. 48, № 4. P. 467–480.

  195. Hsu J.R., Mir H., Wally M.K., et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pain Management in Acute Musculoskeletal Injury // J. Orthop. Trauma. 2019. Vol. 33, № 5. P. e158–e182.

  196. Lee S.K., Lee J.W., Choy W.S. Is multimodal analgesia as effective as postoperative patient-controlled analgesia following upper extremity surgery? // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. 2013. Vol. 99, № 8. P. 895–901.

  197. Richman J.M., Liu S.S., Courpas G., et al. Does Continuous Peripheral Nerve Block Provide Superior Pain Control to Opioids? A Meta-Analysis // Anesth. Analg. 2006. Vol. 102, № 1. P. 248–257.

  198. Hauer J. Pain in children: Approach to pain assessment and overview of management principles // UpToDate. Poplack DG. Wolters Kluwer.

  199. Orliaguet G., Hamza J., Couloigner V., et al. A Case of Respiratory Depression in a Child With Ultrarapid CYP2D6 Metabolism After Tramadol // Pediatrics. 2015. Vol. 135, № 3. P. e753–e755.

  200. Schechter W. Pharmacologic management of acute perioperative pain in infants and children // UpToDate. Sun LS. Wolters Kluwer.

  201. Megarbane A, Bizzari S, Deepthi A, et al. A 20-year Clinical and Genetic Neuromuscular Cohort Analysis in Lebanon: An International Effort. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2022;9(1):193-210. doi:10.3233/JND-210652.

  202. Orthopedics: National Guidelines / N.G. Fomichev, A.A. Lutsik, A.E. Simonovich, A.V. Krutko. – 2nd ed., revised and expanded. – Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publishing Group LLC, 2013. – 944 p. – ISBN 978-5-9704-2448-3. – EDN: TFLTNH. (In Russ.)

  203. Monagle P., Chan A.K.C., Goldenberg N.A., et al. Antithrombotic Therapy in Neonates and Children // Chest. Elsevier BV, 2012. Vol. 141, № 2. P. e737S-e801S.

  204. Erkilinc M, Clarke A, Poe-Kochert C, et al. Is There Value in Venous Thromboembolism Chemoprophylaxis After Pediatric Scoliosis Surgery? A 28-Year Single Center Study. J Pediatr Orthop. 2021;41(3):138-142. doi:10.1097/BPO.0000000000001746.

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

Full name(s) of the authors

Institution

1. Ryabykh Sergey Olegovich (corresponding executor), D.Sc. (Med.)1, 2, 3

2. Klimov Vladimir Sergeevich, D.Sc. (Med.)1, 3

3. Kalashnikov Alexey Andreevich1

Research and Clinical Institute of Pediatrics and Pediatric Surgery named after Academician Yu.E. Veltischev

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow

4. Gubin Alexander Vadimovich, D.Sc. (Med.), Professor1, 2, 3

5. Glukhov Dmitry Alexandrovich, Ph.D. (Med.)

Pirogov Clinic of High Medical Technologies of Saint Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg

6. Filatov Egor Yurievich, Ph.D. (Med.)1, 2, 3

7. Ochirova Polina Vyacheslavovna, Ph.D. (Med.)1, 2, 3

8. Savin Dmitry Mikhailovich, Ph.D. (Med.)1, 2, 3

9. Sergeenko Olga Mikhailovna, Ph.D. (Med.)1, 2, 3

10. Saifutdinov Marat Samatovich, D.Sc. (Biol.)

Ilizarov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Kurgan

11. Mlyavikh Sergey Gennadievich, D.Sc. (Med.)1, 2, 3

JSC «Ilyin Hospital»

12. Ryabykh Tatyana Viktorovna

MEDSI Clinical Hospital in Otradnoye, Moscow

13. Vetrile Marchel Stepanovich, D.Sc. (Med.)1,2

14. Kolesov Sergey Vasilievich, D.Sc. (Med.), Professor1,2

15. Kuleshov Alexander Alekseevich, D.Sc. (Med.),1,2

16. Tretyakova Anastasia Nikolaevna

17. Kokorev Alexey Ivanovich, Ph.D. (Med.)1,2

18. Otdelenov Vitaly Alexandrovich, Ph.D. (Med.)

Priorov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopedics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow

19. Mikhailovsky Mikhail Vitalevich, D.Sc. (Med.), Professor1, 2

Novosibirsk Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics named after Ya.L. Tsivyan of the Russian Ministry of Health, Novosibirsk

20. Ulrich Eduard Vladimirovich, D.Sc. (Med.), Professor1, 2

Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Saint Petersburg

21. Alexander Yu. Mushkin, MD, PhD, Professor1, 2, 3

22. Denis G. Naumov, PhD1, 2, 3

FSBI St. Petersburg Research Institute of Phthisiopulmonology of the Russian Ministry of Health, St. Petersburg

23. Sergey V. Vissarionov, MD, PhD, Professor, Corresponding Member of the RAS

24. Dmitry N. Kokushin, PhD

25. Marat S. Asadulaev, PhD

Turner National Medical Research Center for Children's Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health, St. Petersburg

26. Tatyana V. Buylova, MD, PhD, Associate Professor2, 4

National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

27. Gennady E. Sheyko, Associate Professor, PhD4

Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Nizhny Novgorod

1 – Russian Association of Spine Surgeons (RASS);

2 – Association of Traumatologists and Orthopedists of Russia (ATOR);

3 – AOSpine Global Association for Spine Science;

4 – Union of Rehabilitologists of Russia.

Conflict of interest:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience of these clinical guidelines:

  1. Orthopedic trauma surgeons.

  2. Neurosurgeons.

  3. Neurologists.

  4. Surgeons.

Stages of assessing levels of evidence and grades of recommendation:

  1. Definition of search and selection criteria for publications on clinical trials (CT) regarding the efficacy and/or safety of the medical intervention described in the recommendation statement.

  2. Systematic search and selection of CT publications in accordance with the previously defined criteria.

Systematic search and selection of clinical trial publications:

The evidence base for the recommendations consisted of publications retrieved via information retrieval in the following databases: Central Scientific Medical Library (CSML) "Russian Medicine", MEDLINE (US NLM), and COCHRANE Library; scientific electronic libraries eLibrary.ru and "CyberLeninka"; as well as on the Internet using Yandex, Google, and Google Scholar search engines, by reviewing leading specialized peer-reviewed domestic medical journals on the subject and treatment guidelines for fractures from the international Association for Osteosynthesis AO/ASIF.

Table 1. Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

Table 2. Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, rehabilitation interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis

2

Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

Table 3. Scale for assessing grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitation interventions)

GoR

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.

The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

Appendix A3.1 Assessment of rehabilitation potential and procedures [118, 119]

Score

Care recommendations

Non-verticalizable (bedridden) patients, late non-ambulatory stage

Postural control.

Scoliosis.

Hip joint laxity.

Sitting ability.

Chest deformity.

Orthoses should be removed 60 minutes before sleep.

The duration of exercise sessions for effective stretching and range of motion increase depends on the patient's specific needs, joint condition, and rehabilitation goals.

Contractures (goniometry, ROM)

The minimum frequency of stretching and range of motion exercises is 3–5 times per week.

The minimum frequency of effective orthotic management is 5 times per week.

Muscle weakness (movements against gravity). Functional scales (CHOP INTEND).

Motor development (HINE).

Recommend switch-adapted toys, lightweight rattles, bath equipment, adapted beds, and patient lifts (hoists),

Strollers with folding canopies and power wheelchairs with recline/tilt-in-space functions, adapted seating.

Patients able to maintain a supported sitting position (sitting), early non-ambulatory stage

Postural control.

Foot and chest deformities.

Scoliosis and pelvic obliquity.

Hip joint instability.

Orthoses should be removed 60 minutes before sleep.

Minimum frequency of orthotic management: 5 times per week.

Contractures (goniometry, ROM – range of motion assessment)

Minimum frequency of stretching and ROM exercises: 5–7 times per week. Ensure joint alignment during stretching or joint exercises.

Supported standing duration should be up to 60 minutes, with a minimum frequency of 3–5 times per week, optimal 5–7 times per week.

Functional scales (HFMSE, RULM, MFM).

Muscle weakness (strength tests).

Exercises can effectively impact function, strength, ROM, endurance, ADL, participation, and balance

Patients capable of independent walking (ambulatory stage)

Mobility.

Timed tests.

Endurance testing (6MWT).

Falls.

Functional scales (HFMSE, RULM).

Muscle weakness (strength tests).

Recommend swimming, hippotherapy, and sports. All sitting patients must be provided with power wheelchairs, individualized posture support devices, and seating accessories

Lightweight manual wheelchairs are ideal for promoting independent mobility in patients with satisfactory shoulder girdle muscle strength.

Recommend aerobic and general conditioning exercises for ambulatory patients with SMA.

Options include: swimming, walking, cycling, yoga, hippotherapy, rowing, elliptical/cross trainers.

The exercise program should be developed and supervised by a physical therapist or a specialist physician familiar with SMA. Optimal duration of aerobic exercise: at least 30 minutes.

Contractures (PROM, goniometry)

Minimum frequency: 2–3 times per week, optimal: 3–5. Maintain flexibility through active stretching and incorporate orthoses according to specific needs.

Postural control.

Scoliosis.

Hip joint instability.

Balance exercises are recommended.

ROM – range of motion;

CHOP-INTEND – Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders;

HINE – Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination;

AFOs – Ankle Foot Orthosis;

KAFOs – Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis;

HKAFOs – Hip Knee Ankle Foot Orthosis;

TLSOs – Thoracolumbosacral Orthosis;

WHFO – Wrist Hand Finger Orthosis;

HFMSE – Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (for SMA patients);

RULM – Revised Upper Limb Module (for SMA);

MFM – Motor Function Measure (for patients with neuromuscular diseases);

6MWT – 6-Minute Walk Test;

ADL – Activities of Daily Living.

Appendix A3.3. Pain management recommendations for major musculoskeletal trauma in adults

The table presents analgesic medications and their dosing regimens in accordance with the Clinical Guideline for the Management of Acute Musculoskeletal Pain [183].

Stage of treatment

Opioid analgesics (N02A group)

Non-opioid analgesics (Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs) and #gabapentin

Inpatient setting

Trimeperidine** 25–50 mg orally. Maximum single dose is 50 mg, maximum daily dose is 200 mg.

Ketorolac** 15 mg IV every 6 hours for 5 doses, then ibuprofen** 600 mg orally every 8 hours [183]

OR Trimeperidine** 10–40 mg (from 1 ml of 10 mg/ml solution to 2 ml of 20 mg/ml solution) IM, SC, or IV. Maximum single dose is 40 mg, daily dose is 160 mg.

#Gabapentin 100 mg 3 times a day [183]

Morphine** 10–30 mg IM or SC as needed for severe breakthrough pain

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours

Outpatient stage

First week (after discharge)

Tramadol** single dose 100 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 100 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

Ibuprofen** 600 mg orally every 8 hours for 7 days

#Gabapentin 100 mg 1 tablet orally 3 times a day for 7 days [183]

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours for 7 days

Second week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

#Gabapentin 300 mg 3 times a day (gradually increase to the maximum daily dose of 1800 mg/day if necessary)

Paracetamol** 500 mg orally every 12 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are tapered)

Third week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

#Gabapentin as needed (max. 1800 mg/day)

Paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 12 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are tapered)

Fourth week

Tramadol** single dose 50 mg orally as needed; if analgesia is insufficient, repeat 50 mg after 30–60 minutes. Maximum daily dose is 400 mg.

NSAIDs as needed

#Gabapentin as needed (max. 1800 mg/day)

#Paracetamol** 1000 mg orally every 8 hours (dose may be increased as opioid doses are reduced)

Fifth week and beyond

-

NSAIDs as needed

Paracetamol** as needed

#Gabapentin as needed, then discontinue.

Appendix A3.4 Pain medication dosing regimen for children

Medicinal products

Single dose

Dosing regimen

Maximum daily dose

Maximum duration of use

Non-narcotic analgesic (Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs)

Paracetamol**

Rectal suppositories:

3-6 months (6-8 kg): 50 mg

rectally at intervals of at least 4-6 hours

100 mg/day

Not specified in the instructions

7-12 months (8-11 kg): 100 mg

200 mg/day

1-4 years (12-16 kg): 100 mg

400 mg/day

5-9 years (17-30 kg): 250 mg

1000 mg/day

10-14 years: 500 mg

2000 mg/day

over 15 years: 500 mg

4000 mg/day

IV infusion:

10 kg and under: 7.5 mg/kg (0.75 ml/kg)

no more than 4 times/day, interval between infusions at least 4 hours

no more than 30 mg/kg/day

Not specified in the instructions

from 10 kg up to 33 kg inclusive: 15 mg/kg (1.5 ml/kg)

less than 60 mg/kg inclusive, but not more than 2 g

from 33 to 50 kg inclusive: 15 mg/kg (1.5 ml/kg)

less than 60 mg/kg inclusive, but not more than 3 g

over 50 kg: 1 g (100 ml)

no more than 4 g/day

Tablets

3-5 years: 200 mg

Every 4-6 hours

no more than 4 times a day

6-8 years: 250 mg

no more than 4 times a day

9-11 years: 500 mg

no more than 4 times a day

Over 12 years: 500-1000 mg

no more than 4 g/day

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Diclofenac**

Powder for oral solution

14-18 years: 50-100 mg

0.5-2 mg/kg per day orally, daily dose divided into 2-3 single doses

150 mg

Not specified in the instructions

Tablets:

6-14 years: 25 mg

0.5-2 mg/kg per day orally, daily dose divided into 2-3 single doses

150 mg

Not specified in the instructions

14-18 years: 25-50 mg

Ibuprofen**

Suspension (100 mg/5 ml):

3-6 months (5-7.6 kg): 2.5 ml (50 mg)

orally up to 3 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

7.5 ml (150 mg)

No more than 5 days

6-12 months (7.7-9 kg): 2.5 ml (50 mg)

orally 3-4 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

10 ml (200 mg)

1-3 years (10-16 kg): 5 ml

orally up to 3 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

15 ml (300 mg)

4–6 years (17–20 kg): 7.5 ml

22.5 ml (450 mg)

7–9 years (21–30 kg): 10 ml

30 ml (600 mg)

10–12 years (31–40 kg): 15 ml

45 ml (900 mg)

Suspension (200 mg / 5 ml):

1–3 years (10–16 kg): 2.5 ml (100 mg)

orally up to 3 times/day at intervals of 6-8 hours

7.5 ml (300 mg)

No more than 5 days

4–6 years (17–20 kg): 3.75 ml (150 mg)

11.25 ml (450 mg)

7–9 years (21–30 kg): 5 ml (200 mg)

15 ml (600 mg)

10–12 years (31–40 kg): 7.5 ml (300 mg)

22.5 ml (900 mg)

over 12 years (over 40 kg): 7.5–10 ml (300–400 mg)

30 ml (1200 mg)

Tablets:

aged 6 to 12 years (body weight > 20 kg): 200 mg

orally up to 4 times/day with an interval of at least 6 hours

800 mg

Not specified in the instructions

children over 12 years: 200 mg

orally 3–4 times/day with an interval of at least 6 hours

rectal suppositories, [FOR CHILDREN]

3–9 months (6.0 kg–8.0 kg): 1 suppository (60 mg)

Up to 3 times per 24 hours, maximum 180 mg per day

30 mg/kg with dosing intervals of 6–8 hours

Maximum 3 days

9 months–2 years (8.0 kg–12.0 kg): 1 suppository (60 mg)

Up to 4 times per 24 hours, maximum 240 mg per day

Ketorolac**

Tablets:

children over 16 years: 10 mg

orally up to 4 times/day

40 mg

5 days

Parenteral solution

over 16 years: 10–30 mg

IV, IM with an interval of at least 6 hours

90 mg

2 days

Opioid and opioid-like analgesics

Morphine**

Oral solution/tablets

3 to 7 years: 5 mg

orally, every 6 hours

20 mg

Not specified in the instructions

7 to 17 years with body weight up to 70 kg: 5 mg

orally,

every 4 hours

30 mg

7 to 17 years with body weight of 70 kg or more: 10 mg

60 mg

17 years and older: 5–10 mg

Not specified in the instructions

Solution for subcutaneous injection:

birth to 2 years: 100–200 mcg/kg body weight (0.1–0.2 mg/kg)

SC, if necessary every 4–6 hours.

15 mg

Not specified in the instructions

over 2 years: 100–200 mcg/kg body weight (0.1–0.2 mg/kg)

SC if necessary every 4–6 hours

Tramadol**1

Parenteral solution

1 to 12 years*: 1–2 mg/kg

IV, IM, SC

8 mg/kg/day or maximum 400 mg/day

Aged 12 years and older: 50–100 mg

IV, IM, SC; if satisfactory analgesia is not achieved 30–60 minutes after the initial dose, an additional 50 mg may be administered

400 mg/day

Not specified in the instructions

Tablets:

children over 14 years of age:

50–100 mg

orally; if satisfactory analgesia is not achieved within 30–60 minutes after the initial administration, an additional 50 mg may be prescribed

400 mg/day

Not specified in the instructions

Trimeperidine**

Parenteral solution

Children2 over 2 years of age: 3–10 mg

IV, IM, SC

Not specified in the instructions

Not specified in the instructions

Fentanyl**

Parenteral solution

children from 1 year of age with spontaneous breathing: initial dose 3–5 mcg/kg, additional dose 1 mcg/kg.

IV

Not specified in the instructions

Not specified in the instructions

children from 1 year of age receiving mechanical ventilation: initial dose 15 mcg/kg, additional dose 1–3 mcg/kg.

IV

Not specified in the instructions

Not specified in the instructions

1 In children under 12 years of age, morphine** is preferred if opioid analgesics are required, as the use of tramadol** is associated with a higher risk of adverse reactions [198, 199].

2 Not recommended for use in children, as its metabolite accumulates in the body and provokes seizures upon repeated administration [200].

Key scales/tests recommended for the evaluation of 5q SMA patients with various motor abilities

Appendix A3. Reference Materials — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

CHOP-INTEND – The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders;

HINE – Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination – Assessment of neurological status in infants;

HFMSE – Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded – Assessment of motor functions in 5q SMA;

RULM – Revised Upper Limb Module – Assessment of upper limb motor function;

MSM – Motor Function Measure – Assessment of motor function;

6-MWT – The 6 Minute Walk Test

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix B1. Physician's algorithm of actions in suspected acute inflammatory spinal disease

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Appendix C. Patient Information

  1. Postoperative rehabilitation. The early rehabilitation period continues until the wound is completely healed and the pre-surgical level of verticalization is restored. The pace and characteristics of the rehabilitation period are individual for each person.

  2. Postoperative sutures. In most cases, the patient is discharged after the sutures have healed by primary intention. This means that a "crust" forms on the surface of the suture, beneath which a narrow linear scar develops. Daily suture care is performed according to the attending physician's prescriptions. Once the "crust" detaches, the scar requires no further treatment. Scar maturation typically occurs within 1 month. It is recommended to wear cotton or knit clothing that does not irritate the skin in the area of the postoperative suture. It is extremely undesirable to touch the suture with hands (cleaning is done with cotton swabs); expose the suture to water or moisture. Visiting saunas and steam rooms is not recommended until complete healing. For showering, a waterproof dressing can be independently applied over the suture; do not peel off the "crusts" before the scar forms;

  3. Psycho-emotional changes. In some cases, the following phenomena may be observed after discharge: emotional lability, irritability, tearfulness; lowered mood, apathy, fatigue; sleep disturbances. These manifestations are a natural bodily reaction to "surgical stress" and resolve as the general condition improves, without any treatment. In rare cases (when the condition causes significant distress), consulting a psychotherapist, neurologist, or the attending physician is recommended. To help stabilize emotional well-being, maintaining a balance between active periods and rest, and listening to or viewing relaxation music programs is beneficial. If falling asleep is difficult, it is advisable to switch to another activity (listen to music, read, change body position), and air out the room. The body needs some time to restore normal sleep patterns. In case of prolonged sleep disturbance, consultation with a neurologist is recommended.

  4. Pain. Pain in the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar spine is possible. This pain may occur or intensify after physical exertion. This is a common phenomenon and should not cause alarm. Medications prescribed by the attending physician, relaxation exercises, and light massage may be used. If the pain becomes pronounced, persistent, and radiates to the arms or legs, it is recommended to consult a local neurologist, making sure to consult the attending physician first.

  5. The journey home. You can travel home by car, bus, train, or plane. As a rule, transportation is carried out in a prone or side-lying position. In a car, you can ride in the back seat or on a fully reclined front passenger seat. On a train, transportation is carried out on the lower bunk of a compartment (the necessary certificate can be obtained from the head nurse of the department). On a bus or plane, it is best to recline the seat back or occupy several vacant seats. At the airport, you must have your discharge summary and X-ray with you.

  6. Orthopedic regimen. Prolonged standing should be avoided. Heavy lifting and carrying (not more than 3 kg), seasonal agricultural work, and general physical education are strictly prohibited. Sitting is not recommended until fatigue sets in during the first 6 months after surgery; avoid trunk flexion and rotation, as well as bending and lifting the legs. Assistance is recommended for comfortably putting on shoes. Sleeping on a semi-firm bed with a small pillow is advised. To go to bed or use the restroom, conditions similar to those in the hospital must be set up (handrails, stands, supports).

  7. Stair climbing. If walking is possible, going up and down stairs requires significantly more effort than walking on a flat surface. You should ascend and descend stairs step-by-step (using the trailing-leg method) with rest stops, holding onto the handrails.

  8. Studies. Individualized education is recommended after surgery. The school or university administration must be notified of the surgery. For home schooling, proper organization of the workstation is required: the desk height must be correctly adjusted, and the light source must be sufficiently bright. Classes can be conducted while lying down, standing, or kneeling. Take a break if fatigue occurs. At school or university, classes should be conducted in similar body positions. If fatigue appears, it is best to be excused from class and rest in a lying position.

  9. Profession. It is undesirable to choose a profession associated with prolonged standing.

  10. Nutrition. A proper dietary regimen is important during the recovery period. It is advisable to avoid fried and fatty foods, as well as to reduce the intake of salty foods, sweets, and organ meats. Body weight should correspond to height. Mealtimes should be consistent. Excessive food intake should be avoided. Nutrition should be diverse, wholesome, and vitamin-rich.

  11. Physical activity. Any physical activity, except for walking, may be permitted only after consulting the attending physician. Physical loads should be increased gradually, moving from light exercises to more complex ones. Swimming in a pool is recommended no earlier than 3 months after surgery (at least 2 times a week). Sports involving the risk of falls and trauma are not recommended.

  12. Follow-up care and control examinations. After discharge, you should make an appointment with an orthopedic trauma surgeon, general practitioner/primary care physician, and neurologist. You must bring your discharge summary to the appointment.

    Physiotherapy is not recommended during the first 6 months after surgery. A follow-up examination to assess treatment efficacy is performed at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. To do this, you need to book an appointment in advance at the outpatient clinic reception desk using the phone number listed in your discharge summary!

  13. Disability status. For issues regarding obtaining (extending) disability status, please consult your attending physician (hardware is implanted permanently and removed only for specific clinical indications). If you have any questions related to your surgery, please do not hesitate to contact your attending physician directly. Every patient returns to their usual activity level at their own individual pace. Do not compare yourself to other patients. Alternate between an upright position and rest. Avoid walking to the point of fatigue. For some time, pain in the area of the postoperative sutures may be bothersome. Listen to the radio or music to distract yourself, or get up and take a short walk before trying to fall asleep again. Mood swings are common during recovery and will resolve over time. It is recommended to wear cotton or knit clothing that does not irritate the skin around the postoperative incision. It is important to inform every healthcare provider you visit that you have undergone spine surgery. Any recommendations or treatment modalities proposed in an outpatient setting must be coordinated with your attending physician.

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Appendix G1. Muscle strength scoring

Russian name: Muscle Strength Grading Scale

Source (official developer website, validation publication) [110]:

Type (underline): rating scale

Purpose: assessment of muscle strength

Content (template):

0

– absence of active movement

– plegia

1

– preserved movement (with barely perceptible muscle contraction)

– severe paresis

2

– full range of motion possible only with gravity eliminated

– severe paresis

3

– moderate decrease in muscle strength (full range of motion against gravity)

– moderate paresis

4

– slight decrease in strength (with resistance)

– mild paresis

5

– full muscle strength

– normal

Appendix G2. Visual analogue scale for pain

Russian name: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (Numerical) (VAS)

Original name (if applicable): Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Source (official developer website, validation publication): [111]

Type (underline): rating scale

Purpose: assessment of pain severity

Content (template):

Appendix G1 - G... Rating Scales, Questionnaires — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Appendix G3. Functional scale for assessing global motor impairments

Russian name: Gross Motor Function Classification System – GMFCS

Original name: Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)

Source (official developer website, validation publication): [120]

Type: rating scale

Purpose: assessment of upper extremity motor function

Content (template): This is a descriptive system that accounts for the degree of motor development and movement limitations in daily life for 5 age groups of patients with cerebral palsy: under 2 years, 2 to 4 years, 4 to 6 years, 6 to 12 years, and 12 to 18 years. According to GMFCS, there are 5 levels of gross motor function development:

Level I – walks without limitations

  • Under 2 years – onset of independent walking

  • 2 to 4 years – independent walking without running and jumping

  • 4 to 6 years – independent walking, climbing stairs, running, and jumping

  • 6 to 12 years, 12 to 18 years – independent walking over obstacles, running, and jumping, participation in sports activities

Level II – walks with limitations

  • Under 2 years – crawls on stomach and hands-and-knees, cruises along furniture

  • 2 to 4 years – crawls on hands-and-knees, cruises, independent walking by 4 years of age

  • 4 to 6 years – independent walking for short distances, climbs stairs using a handrail, unable to run or jump

  • 6 to 12 years, 12 to 18 years – independent walking for long distances in familiar settings, uses mobility aids outdoors, runs and jumps poorly

Differences between Level I and Level II: children at level II have limitations in freedom of movement, walking outdoors, and in peer groups; assistive devices are required to master walking. Movement quality is impaired – the child cannot run or jump

Level III – walks using assistive mobility devices

  • Under 2 years – rolls over and crawls on stomach

  • 2 to 4 years – creeps on belly or crawls on hands-and-knees (reciprocally), walks with handheld mobility devices for short distances

  • 4 to 6 years – can stand up from a chair without support, but walks only with assistive devices

  • 6 to 12 years, 12 to 18 years – walks only with assistive devices, can ascend and descend stairs with a handrail, moves outdoors exclusively in a wheelchair

The difference between Level II and Level III lies in the degree of functional activity. Level III children require assistive devices and orthoses for walking. Level II children do not require walking aids after 4 years of age.

Level IV – moves with limitations; powered mobility devices may be used

  • Under 2 years – rolls over, but does not maintain sitting posture

  • 2 to 4 years – sits in adapted equipment, but creeps on belly

  • 4 to 6 years – can sit down and stand up from a chair with adult assistance, at best can move short distances using assistive devices

  • 6 to 12 years, 12 to 18 years – moves around the room by rolling or crawling on the stomach, can move in walkers supporting the pelvic girdle and trunk

The difference between Level III and Level IV is evident in the ability to sit, even with the use of assistive devices. Level III children sit independently, move across the floor independently, and walk using assistive devices. Level IV children can sit, but independent mobility is very limited. Level IV children are more frequently transported in a wheelchair.

Level V – mobility is restricted to a manual wheelchair

  • Under 2 years – require adult assistance to roll over

  • 2 to 4 years – some children achieve independent mobility using a motorized high-tech wheelchair

  • 4 to 6 years, 6 to 12 years, 12 to 18 years – some children achieve independent mobility using a high-tech power wheelchair. Level V children cannot independently control movements and maintain posture against gravity (do not maintain head and trunk control). Independent mobility is possible only with the use of advanced power wheelchairs.

Appendix G1 - G... Rating Scales, Questionnaires — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Appendix G4. Classification of communication functions and skills

Russian name: Communication Function Classification System

Original name (if applicable): Communication Function Classification System (CFCS)

Source (official developer website, validation publication): http://cfcs.us/

Type (underline): rating scale

Purpose: assessment of communication functions and skills

Content (template):

CFCS includes five levels:

1. Effective communication with familiar and unfamiliar communication partners.

The child easily comprehends incoming messages, transmits their own messages, and successfully acts in both roles. Communication occurs effortlessly and at a comfortable pace for all participants (both familiar and unfamiliar). Communication breakdowns are quickly resolved and do not affect communicative productivity.

2. Effective but slower-paced communication with familiar and unfamiliar communication partners.

The child acts as both a sender and a receiver of messages, communicating with both acquaintances and strangers, although they may require additional time to understand a message or to formulate and express their own. Communication misunderstandings are usually resolved without outside help and do not affect communication productivity. The overall pace of communication is reduced.

3. Simple communication only with familiar people.

The child easily understands and sends messages, but only during communication with familiar people. Communication with strangers is often ineffective.

4. Delayed simple communication only with familiar people.

Possible communication options: 1) sometimes successful sender and receiver; 2) successfully sends messages, but poor understanding; 3) good understanding of messages, but poor output.

5. Rare simple communication even with familiar people.

The child is limited as a sender and receiver. The child's communication is incomprehensible to most people. The child poorly understands speech addressed to them. Sometimes communication is successful with familiar people.

Appendix G5. Classification of manual skills

Russian title: Manual Ability Classification System

Original title (if applicable): Manual Ability Classification System (MACS)

Source (official developer website, validation publication): https://www.macs.nu/

Type (underline): rating scale

Purpose: assessment of hand functions and manual abilities

Content (template):

The MACS classification includes 5 levels by analogy with the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS).

Level I – the child handles objects easily and successfully.

Level II – the child handles most objects, but with somewhat reduced quality and/or speed of achievement.

Level III – the child handles objects with difficulty; needs help in preparation and/or modification of activities.

Level IV – the child handles a limited selection of easily managed objects in adapted situations.

Level V – the child does not handle objects and has severely limited ability to perform even simple actions.

Appendix G6. Motor function rating scale

Russian title: Motor function rating scale

Original title (if applicable): Motor Function Measure (MFM)

Source (official developer website, validation publication): https://mfm-nmd.org

[Berarda C., Payan C., Hodgkinsona I., Fermanian J. The MFM Collaborative Study Group A motor function measure scale for neuromuscular diseases. Construction and validation study. Neuromuscular Disord. 2005; 15: 463–470] [117]

Type (underline): rating scale

Purpose: assessment of motor function in patients with neuromuscular diseases

Content (template):

List of 32 motor function measurement items with starting position and required exercises

№

Position

Required exercises and conditions to obtain the maximum score

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

Supine

Sitting on a mat

Standing

Sitting on a chair

Sitting on a chair or in their wheelchair

Sitting on a chair

Standing with upper limb support in an assistive device

Standing

Standing without support

- Head on axis: holds the head on axis and turns it completely to one side and then to the other.

- Lifts the head and maintains the raised position

- Flexes hip and knee more than 90°, lifting the foot off the mat

- Lower limb supported by the examiner: from a plantarflexion position, lifts the foot into dorsal flexion at 90° relative to the leg

- Lifts one hand from the mat and moves it to the opposite shoulder

- Lower limbs semi-flexed, patella pointing upwards, feet resting on the mat: lifts pelvis, lumbar spine, pelvis and hips aligned, feet slightly apart

- Rolls onto abdomen and frees upper limbs

- Sits on the mat without upper limb support

- Maintains sitting position without upper limb support and is then able to maintain

contact between both hands

- Tennis ball placed in front of the subject: without upper limb support, leans forward, touches the ball and sits back up

- Stands up without upper limb support

- Sits down on a chair without upper limb support, legs slightly apart.

- Maintains sitting position without upper limb support or by leaning against the back of the chair, head and trunk on axis

- Head in flexion: from a fully flexed position, lifts the head and maintains the raised position, head

on axis during movement and while maintaining

- Forearms on the table, but not elbows: lifts both hands to the crown of the head simultaneously, head and trunk on axis

- Pencil on the table: reaches for a pencil with one hand, elbow fully extended at the end of the movement

- 10 coins laid out on the table: sequentially picks up and holds 10 coins in one hand for 20 sec

- One finger placed in the center of a fixed CD: traces the entire border of the disc with one finger

without arm support

- Pencil on the table: picks up a pencil placed next to the hand and draws a continuous series

of 1 cm high loops within a 4 cm long frame

- Holding a sheet of paper: tears paper folded into 4 parts, starting from the fold

- Tennis ball on the table: picks up the ball, lifts it off the table, and turns the hand holding the ball

- Finger placed in the center of a fixed square: lifts the finger and places it sequentially in the

center of 8 diagram squares without touching the lines

- Upper limbs along the trunk: places two forearms and/or hands on the table simultaneously

- Stands without upper limb support, legs slightly apart

- Releases support and maintains standing position, legs slightly apart, head, trunk and limbs on axis

- Lifts one leg without upper limb support for 10 seconds

- Lowers down without support, touches the floor with one hand, and stands back up

- Walks forward 10 steps on both heels

- Walks forward 10 steps in a straight line

- Runs 10 m

- On one leg: hops in place on one leg 10 times

- Assumes a squat position without upper limb support and stands up twice in a row

Appendix G7. Upper limb motor function assessment module

Russian title: Revised Upper Limb Module

Original title (if available): REVISED UPPER LIMB MODULE

Source (official developer website, validation publication): [115]

Type (underline): rating scale

Purpose: assessment of upper extremity motor function

Content (template):

Appendix G1 - G... Rating Scales, Questionnaires — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Appendix G1 - G... Rating Scales, Questionnaires — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Appendix G1 - G... Rating Scales, Questionnaires — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Appendix G1 - G... Rating Scales, Questionnaires — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Appendix G8. HFMSE functional motor scale

Russian title: Functional Motor Scale

Original title (if available): The Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE)

Source (official developer website, validation publication): [116]

Type (underline): rating scale

Purpose: assessment of upper extremity motor function

Content (template):

Appendix G9. Caprini Scale for Individual Assessment of Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Complications

Russian title: Scale for Individual Assessment of Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Complications according to Caprini.

Original title: Caprini Score for Venous Thromboembolism

Source: Lobastov K.V., Barinov V.E., Schastlivtsev I.V., Laberko L.A. Caprini scale as a tool for individual risk stratification of postoperative venous thromboembolism in the high-risk group. Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery. 2014; (12):16-23.

Type: scale

Purpose: assessment of venous thromboembolism risk

Contents:

1 point

Age 41-60 years

Lower extremity edema

Varicose veins

Body mass index > 25 kg/m2

Minor surgery

Sepsis (< 1 month)

Severe pulmonary disease (including pneumonia < 1 month)

Systemic hormonal contraceptive use (oral contraceptives), hormone replacement therapy

Pregnancy and postpartum period (< 1 month)

History of unexplained stillbirths, spontaneous abortions (≥3),

Premature birth with preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction

Acute myocardial infarction

Chronic heart failure (< 1 month)

Bed rest in a non-surgical patient

History of inflammatory bowel disease

History of major surgery (< 1 month)

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2 points

Age 61-74 years

Arthroscopic surgery

Malignant neoplasm105

Laparoscopic surgery (duration > 45 min)

Bed rest > 72 h

Limb immobilization (< 1 month)

Central venous catheterization

Major surgery (duration > 45 min)

3 points

Age > 75 years

Personal history of VTE

Family history of VTE

Factor V Leiden mutation

Prothrombin G20210A mutation

Hyperhomocysteinemia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Elevated anticardiolipin antibodies

Lupus anticoagulant

5 points

Stroke (< 1 month)

Multiple trauma (< 1 month)

Major joint arthroplasty

Femur and lower leg fractures (< 1 month)

Spinal cord injury/paralysis (< 1 month)

Interpretation: Depending on the score obtained during history taking and patient examination, the patient is stratified into one of the risk groups:

  • low risk: 0–1 point;

  • moderate risk: 2 points;

  • high risk: 3–4 points;

  • very high risk: 5 points or more.

Appendix G1 - G... Rating Scales, Questionnaires — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Appendix G1 - G... Rating Scales, Questionnaires — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Appendix G1 - G... Rating Scales, Questionnaires — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Appendix G1 - G... Rating Scales, Questionnaires — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Appendix G1 - G... Rating Scales, Questionnaires — Neuromuscular Scoliosis

Scales and calculators from this guideline

VAS for Pain (Visual Analog Scale)Assessment of pain intensity using a 10-point visual analog scaleCaprini ScoreIndividual risk assessment for venous thromboembolic complicationsModified Rankin Scale (mRS)Assessment of disability after strokeBorg Scale (RPE 6–20)Subjective rating of perceived exertion

If you practice in traumatology and orthopedics

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer based on the clinical guidelines for "Neuromuscular Scoliosis" and other current Russian Ministry of Health guidelines with references to specific sections, rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines