List of Abbreviations
GnRH agonist | gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues |
AMH | anti-Müllerian hormone |
GnRH antagonist | gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists (gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptor antagonists) |
IAH | intra-abdominal hypertension |
IAP | intra-abdominal pressure |
ART | assisted reproductive technologies |
AKI | acute kidney injury |
ARDS | acute respiratory distress syndrome |
OHSS | ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome |
PCOS | polycystic ovary syndrome |
NT | transvaginal oocyte retrieval |
VTE | venous thromboembolic events |
ultrasound | ultrasound examination |
CH | chorionic gonadotrophin** |
Terms and Definitions
Ascites – accumulation of fluid in the abdominal cavity, associated with the development of multiple organ failure (dysfunction).
Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) – a sustained or intermittent pathological increase in intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) of ≥12 mm Hg.
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) – fertility treatment methods in which some or all stages of conception and early embryo development are carried out outside the maternal organism (including the use of donor and/or cryopreserved germ cells, reproductive organ tissues, and embryos), as well as surrogate motherhood (definition in accordance with Article 55 of Federal Law No. 323-FZ dated November 21, 2011 (as amended on December 25, 2023) "On the Fundamentals of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation").
Respiratory failure – a condition in which the body either fails to maintain normal arterial blood gas composition or achieves it at the cost of increased work of breathing, leading to a decrease in the functional reserves of the body.
Paracentesis – a therapeutic and diagnostic surgical procedure aimed at detecting internal organ injuries, removing ascitic fluid, and administering medications into the abdominal cavity.
Ovarian stimulation / ovarian stimulation – pharmacological therapy aimed at inducing follicular development in the ovaries.
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) – an acute diffuse inflammatory lesion of the lung parenchyma developing as a non-specific response to various damaging factors and leading to acute respiratory failure (as a component of multiple organ failure) due to impaired lung tissue structure and a reduction in the mass of aerated lung tissue.
Multiple organ failure – a universal syndrome of critical conditions caused by excessive uncontrolled systemic inflammation in response to sepsis, hypovolemic shock, or severe trauma.
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) – an excessive systemic response to ovarian stimulation, characterized by a wide spectrum of clinical and laboratory manifestations. It can be classified as mild, moderate, or severe, depending on the degree of tense ascites, ovarian enlargement, and respiratory, hemodynamic, and metabolic complications.
Spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome – a condition developing as a result of the activation of vasoactive mediator production by the ovaries against the background of pregnancy.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) – renal dysfunction with a reduction in filtration and reabsorption processes, leading to disorders of water, electrolyte, nitrogenous, and other types of metabolism.
Intra-abdominal hypertension syndrome (IAH) – a persistent increase in IAP ≥12 mm Hg (with or without abdominal perfusion pressure <60 mm Hg), which is associated with the manifestation of multiple organ failure (dysfunction).
Thoracentesis – a therapeutic and diagnostic surgical procedure aimed at removing pleural fluid or gas from the pleural cavity.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) – an excessive systemic response to ovarian stimulation, characterized by a wide spectrum of clinical and laboratory manifestations. It can be classified as mild, moderate, or severe, depending on the degree of tense ascites, ovarian enlargement, and respiratory, hemodynamic, and metabolic complications (1–5). Cases of OHSS developing during spontaneous pregnancy are known (6,7).
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
The triggering factor for the development of OHSS is the administration of an ovulatory dose of chorionic gonadotrophin** (CG), which triggers a pathophysiological cascade via the vascular endothelial growth factor against the background of an imbalance of its type 1 and type 2 receptors, as well as activation of the renin-angiotensin system. OHSS may develop immediately after transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR), or within the subsequent 10 days during an established pregnancy (1,4,5,8–12). In some cases, OHSS may develop after ovarian stimulation with clomifene** (13). The pathophysiological mechanisms of spontaneously occurring OHSS during pregnancy, as well as familial recurrent episodes of this syndrome in subsequent pregnancies not associated with ovarian stimulation, are due to polymorphisms of genes encoding follicle-stimulating hormone and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptors (6,7,14–17).
OHSS represents a systemic aseptic inflammatory response of the vascular endothelium to high plasma concentrations of sex steroid hormones, accompanied by generalized endothelial damage and marked vascular permeability, leading to massive leakage of protein-rich fluid into the interstitium and the formation of ascites, hydrothorax, and anasarca. Progressive ascites contributes to an increase in IAP and further elevation of the diaphragm, causing cardiac compression, an increase in pleural and intrathoracic pressure, and a decrease in inferior vena cava blood flow and venous return (18). OHSS is characterized by a hyperdynamic type of hemodynamics, manifested by arterial hypotension, increased cardiac output, decreased peripheral vascular resistance, and increased activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and the sympathetic nervous system (5, 19).
Impairment of renal excretory function occurs as a result of a decrease in circulating blood volume and an increase in IAP with compression of the renal parenchyma, decreased renal blood flow, increased prerenal azotemia, reduced urine output down to oligo-anuria, and the development of AKI (20,21).
Respiratory disorders accompany severe OHSS and are caused by pleural effusion and limitation of diaphragmatic mobility due to elevated IAP. The effusion can be bilateral or unilateral (more often on the right) and occurs against the background of ascites. The mechanism of effusion formation is attributed to the ability of ascitic fluid to penetrate into the right pleural cavity along the thoracic lymphatic duct passing into the mediastinum through the aortic hiatus of the diaphragm (22,23).
In patients with OHSS, high concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines are detected in blood serum, follicular fluid, and peritoneal transudate, under the influence of which systemic activation of coagulation processes occurs, leading to a high risk of thromboembolic complications (TEC) (19,24).
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
Epidemiological evaluation of OHSS is difficult due to the lack of a unified classification of the syndrome. The current incidence of OHSS is low, which is associated with correct risk factor assessment and selection of the trigger for final oocyte maturation. The incidence of severe OHSS ranges from 2% (25) to 9% (26). According to recent data, severe forms of the syndrome requiring hospital admission occur in 1% of cases and are associated with the administration of CG** as a trigger for final oocyte maturation (27). According to the RAHR Register in the Russian Federation for 2021, 88,954 cycles of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) with autologous oocytes and 429 cases of OHSS requiring hospitalization were registered (2020 – 462 cases), which accounts for 0.3% of initiated cycles (in 2020 and 2021) (28).
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
N98.1 Ovarian hyperstimulation.
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
Classification of OHSS by severity (23, 29)
Severity | Symptoms |
Mild OHSS | Abdominal discomfort, abdominal pain, abdominal bloating Diarrhea Maximum ovarian diameter <8 cm No significant laboratory changes |
Moderate OHSS | Clinical manifestations are similar to those of mild OHSS Additionally: Ascites detected by ultrasound examination (US) Maximum ovarian diameter of 8–12 cm |
Severe OHSS | Clinical manifestations as in mild and moderate OHSS Additionally: Clinical manifestations of ascites (hydrothorax) Abdominal compartment syndrome Nausea, vomiting Dyspnea Oliguria (<300 ml/day or <30 ml/h) Maximum ovarian diameter >12 cm Hematocrit >45% Leukocytosis >25×109/L Albumin <35 g/L Creatinine >1.6 mg/dL Creatinine clearance <50 ml/min Elevated alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase above normal reference ranges Sodium <135 mmol/L Potassium >5 mmol/L Osmolality <282 mOsm/kg |
Critical OHSS | Severe abdominal pain Low blood pressure / central venous pressure Tense ascites or massive hydrothorax Rapid weight gain (≥1 kg in 24 hours) Impaired consciousness Oliguria / anuria / acute kidney injury VTE (venous or arterial thrombosis) Arrhythmia, hydropericardium ARDS, pulmonary edema Progressive deterioration of laboratory parameters |
Ovarian size may not correspond to the severity of OHSS after TVP due to follicular aspiration. If there are signs of severe or critical OHSS, women must be assigned to this category regardless of ovarian size.
Classification of OHSS by time of onset (29)
Early OHSS develops within the first 7 days after TVP (first 9 days after hCG administration as a trigger for final oocyte maturation) and is associated with an excessive ovarian response to ovarian stimulation.
Late OHSS occurs 8 or more days after TVP (10 or more days after hCG administration as a trigger for final oocyte maturation) and is associated with endogenous hCG production in the setting of established pregnancy.
If pregnancy does not occur in the ART cycle, symptoms of OHSS of any severity resolve with the onset of menstruation. Late OHSS is more severe, lasting up to 7–10 weeks of gestation with fluctuating exacerbation and alleviation of symptoms.
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
The severity of OHSS correlates with the degree of hemodynamic disturbances, which determine the clinical picture and reflect the severity of vascular permeability.
The onset of OHSS can be either gradual with progressive clinical symptoms or sudden ("acute"), characterized by a sharp fluid redistribution in the body within a few hours or a shorter period, leading to ascites accompanied by hemodynamic disturbances.
Typical clinical symptoms of OHSS include ascites with IAH (30–32), oligo/anuria with AKI development in severe and critical cases (20,21), respiratory disorders associated with hydrothorax (22,23), and jaundice associated with liver dysfunction (23,33).
Fever accompanies the course of OHSS in 80% of patients with the severe form of the syndrome; in 20% of cases, temperature elevation occurs due to a urinary tract infection, in 3.8% due to pneumonia, in 3.3% due to an upper respiratory tract infection, in 2.0% due to catheter-site phlebitis, in 1.0% due to subcutaneous cellulitis at the abdominal paracentesis puncture site, in 1.0% due to a surgical wound infection, and in 0.5% due to a gluteal abscess at the site of intramuscular progesterone injections. Non-infectious fever in every second patient with OHSS is associated with endogenous pyrogenic mechanisms. Isolated cases of sepsis in severe OHSS have been described (22,23,34,35).
OHSS is characterized by a high risk of VTE. Additional risk factors include: a history of venous VTE, presence of high-risk thrombophilia (antithrombin, protein C and S deficiency, homozygous Factor V Leiden mutation, homozygous prothrombin G20210A mutation, antiphospholipid syndrome), hyperestrogenemia, and restricted mobility (36–41). Clinical and laboratory symptoms indicating a high risk of VTE in OHSS include: headache, poor concentration, visual floaters, tinnitus, edema localized in the neck and upper extremities, hematocrit >55%, leukocytosis >25×109/L, and thrombocytosis >350×103/µL. In 84% of cases, thrombosis occurs against the background of pregnancy. In 75% of cases, thrombosis is diagnosed in the venous bed with predominant localization in the vessels of the upper extremities, neck, and head. Spontaneous arterial thrombosis localized in cerebral vessels may develop. Thrombi in the femoral, popliteal, carotid, subclavian, iliac, ulnar, mesenteric arteries and aorta are less common. The incidence of pulmonary embolism in patients with OHSS and deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities is 29%, whereas in women with OHSS and arterial thrombosis, the risk of this complication ranges from 4% to 8% (36–41).
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
*Recommendations apply to all patients with OHSS unless otherwise specified.
Diagnostic criteria: OHSS is diagnosed upon the development of ascites (and/or hydrothorax) and enlarged ovaries (>6 cm3) following ovarian stimulation.
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
It is recommended to assess for complaints of: weakness and dizziness, weight gain, abdominal bloating or pain, nausea or vomiting, dry mouth, constipation or diarrhea, shortness of breath or dry cough, decreased urine output, edema of the external genitalia, abdominal wall, upper and lower extremities in all patients following ovarian stimulation and administration of the trigger for final oocyte maturation for the timely diagnosis of OHSS (1,8,23,29).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
It is recommended during outpatient monitoring of patients with mild OHSS to timely assess signs of increasing OHSS severity: weight and abdominal girth gain, worsening pain, onset of dyspnea, tachycardia, hypotension, decreased urine output (<1000 ml/day) for timely hospitalization of the patient (1), (12).
LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).
2.2 Physical Examination
Are recommended: (1) therapeutic visual inspection, (2) therapeutic palpation, (3) therapeutic percussion, (4) therapeutic auscultation, (5) pulse examination, (6) respiratory rate measurement, (7) blood pressure measurement on peripheral arteries, to diagnose and assess the severity of OHSS, and to rule out exacerbations of chronic somatic diseases and acute surgical pathology (1,8,29,42).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comments: OHSS increases the risk of exacerbations of chronic somatic diseases, such as chronic pyelonephritis, gastric or duodenal ulcer. Acute surgical pathologies, such as acute appendicitis, must also be ruled out (5,23).
It is recommended to measure body weight, height, and body mass index to prescribe correct drug dosages (1,8,29,42).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
General thermometry is recommended to detect/exclude purulent-septic complications (1,8,29,42).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Visual inspection of the external genitalia is recommended to assess for the presence of edema (1,8,29,42).
LoE CGoE 3Level of Evidence C (Grade of Recommendation - 3).
Inspection of the cervix using specula is recommended to assess the condition of the cervix and genital tract discharge (1,8,29,42).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: Genital tract spotting or bleeding may occur in OHSS in the setting of pregnancy with a threat of miscarriage, as well as in ectopic pregnancy.
Bimanual vaginal examination is not recommended due to its low diagnostic value and lack of safety associated with enlarged ovaries and their potential trauma during the examination (43), (44).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
A complete (clinical) blood count is recommended to assess the severity of OHSS (1,8,23,29,42).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comments: The frequency of testing is determined by the severity of OHSS: in mild and moderate OHSS – once every 7 days until recovery; in severe and critical OHSS – daily until hematocrit normalizes (<40%), then once every 7 days until recovery. Hematocrit >40% is associated with moderate OHSS, >45% with severe OHSS, and >55% with critical OHSS and a high risk of VTE. Leukocytosis >12×109/L reflects the severity of the systemic inflammatory response. In some cases, it can reach 50×109/L without a left shift of the leukocyte formula. A left shift of the leukocyte formula is associated with an escalating inflammatory response due to exacerbations of chronic diseases (e.g., pyelonephritis), activation of opportunistic microflora with the development of pneumonia, or the addition of complications requiring surgical intervention (adnexal torsion, acute appendicitis, pelvioperitonitis, peritonitis) (1,8,22,29). A platelet count of 500×103/µL–600×103/µL is associated with a high risk of VTE (23).
A general routine biochemical blood test is recommended to assess metabolic and electrolyte disturbances (8,9,23).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comments: Frequency of testing: once every 5 days until recovery. The biochemical blood test includes the determination of total protein, albumin, free and conjugated bilirubin, glucose, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium. OHSS is characterized by hypoproteinemia and hypoalbuminemia, elevated concentrations of urea and creatinine, hyponatremia and hyperkalemia, and elevated liver enzymes. If electrolyte imbalances are present, blood sodium and potassium levels should be measured daily until values normalize. In the presence of oliguria/anuria, blood urea and creatinine levels should also be measured daily until values normalize and oliguria/anuria resolves.
It is recommended to perform a coagulogram (indicative assessment of the hemostatic system) to assess the risk of thromboembolic events (45), (46).
LoE CGoE 3Level of Evidence C (Grade of Recommendation - 3).
Comment: Frequency of testing: once every 5-7 days until recovery. The coagulogram includes the determination of activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen level, prothrombin (thromboplastin) time, and international normalized ratio (INR) in the blood.
It is recommended to perform a single determination of hCG (free beta-subunit) in blood serum for the purpose of diagnosing pregnancy (43).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: Repeat determination of serum hCG (free beta-subunit) may be performed if ectopic or non-viable pregnancy is suspected.
It is recommended to perform a general (clinical) urinalysis to determine the presence and severity of proteinuria (43).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: Frequency of testing: once every 7 days.
It is recommended to test the blood serum C-reactive protein level to assess the severity of the inflammatory response (23).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: Frequency of testing: once every 7 days; if body temperature rises to ≥38oC, once every 3 days.
In severe and critical OHSS, it is recommended to test blood procalcitonin levels to assess the severity of the systemic inflammatory response (35).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comments: Frequency of testing: once every 5 days. An elevated procalcitonin level is determined in 50% of patients with severe OHSS in the range of 0.5-2.0 ng/mL with leukocytosis >12*109/L.
In severe and critical OHSS, it is recommended to measure blood osmolality (osmolarity) to assess and timely correct its disorders (8,9,23).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: Frequency of testing: daily until parameters normalize.
If body temperature rises to ≥38oC, it is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) urine test for bacterial pathogens (using automated seeding) to detect asymptomatic bacteriuria (35).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
If there are signs of purulent-inflammatory complications, it is recommended to perform microbiological (culture) testing of urine, sputum, and abscesses for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic pathogens, as well as a microbiological (culture) blood test for sterility (23).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
If spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is suspected, it is recommended to perform a microbiological (culture) test of peritoneal fluid for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic pathogens (23), (47).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
24 hours after the removal of ascetic fluid, and then daily until the ascites resolves, it is recommended to measure blood total protein and albumin levels for the timely correction of hypoproteinemia (29).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
It is not recommended to test blood CA125 antigen levels to determine the severity of OHSS (48), (49).
LoE CGoE 3Level of Evidence C (Grade of Recommendation - 3).
Comment: CA125 levels reach maximum values (>5000 IU/mL) by the 2nd week of OHSS development, when the ovaries reach their maximum volume. If pregnancy occurs, the elevated CA125 level persists until the second half of pregnancy and then decreases to normal values (44).
It is not recommended to perform a biochemical analysis of ascetic fluid for the diagnosis and severity assessment of OHSS (22).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: Ascetic fluid is characterized by a high protein and albumin content, a low leukocyte count, a relatively high erythrocyte count, and high concentrations of all pro-inflammatory cytokines and C-reactive protein.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
Recommended comprehensive pelvic ultrasound (transvaginal and transabdominal) to determine the size of the uterus and ovaries, presence of cysts, presence of free fluid in the pelvic cavity, and presence of a gestational sac in the uterine cavity (1, 8, 9).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Recommended: The frequency of the examination is determined by the patient's condition and the severity of OHSS.
Recommended comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and kidney ultrasound to assess the presence of free fluid in the abdominal cavity, size and structure of the liver, condition of the gallbladder, and pelvicalyceal system (1, 8, 9).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: The frequency of the examination is determined by the patient's condition and the severity of OHSS. If clinical signs of ascites progress, the amount of fluid in the abdominal cavity should be assessed immediately to determine indications for its removal.
Recommended pleural ultrasound to assess the presence of free fluid (1, 8, 9).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comments: The frequency of the examination is determined by the patient's condition and the severity of OHSS. In case of dyspnea or dry cough, the examination should be performed every 3 days. If clinical symptoms worsen, the amount of fluid should be assessed immediately to determine indications for its removal.
Recommended electrocardiography to assess heart rhythm and myocardial changes associated with metabolic and electrolyte disturbances (1, 8, 9).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Recommended echocardiography in case of hemodynamic disorders accompanying severe and critical OHSS, to assess ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, and the presence of free fluid in the pericardial cavity (1, 8, 9).
GPR CLOCE 5 Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence - 5).
Recommended chest radiography if acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and pulmonary embolism are suspected, taking into account the possibility of early pregnancy (1, 8, 9).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
In severe and critical OHSS, it is recommended to use an indirect method for assessing the severity of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) based on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) according to Appendix G1 (32).
LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).
2.5 Other Procedures
Recommended consultation (examination, review) by a general practitioner (internist) for differential diagnosis with somatic diseases having similar symptoms (50).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Recommended consultation (examination, review) by a surgeon to rule out acute surgical pathology (51).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Recommended consultation (examination, review) by a cardiovascular surgeon when thromboembolic events (TEE) are suspected, in order to rule them out (50).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Recommended consultation (examination, review) by a thoracic surgeon in the presence of pronounced hydrothorax to decide on pleural puncture (1, 8, 9).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
In moderate, severe, and critical OHSS, recommended is a consultation (examination) by an anesthesiologist-intensivist to determine the treatment tactics (1, 8, 9).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
In severe and critical OHSS, recommended is 24-hour monitoring by an anesthesiologist-intensivist to ensure timely intensive care if needed (1, 8, 9).
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
*Recommendations apply to all patients with OHSS unless otherwise specified.
3.1. Non-pharmacological treatments
In mild OHSS managed in an outpatient setting, it is recommended to inform the patient about the need for daily self-monitoring of fluid balance based on body weight, diuresis, and fluid intake to ensure timely diagnosis of oliguria (1, 8, 9).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: Patients should be informed of the need for daily fluid balance monitoring. Urine output <1000 mL per day requires reassessment of OHSS severity and consideration of hospital admission.
In mild OHSS managed in an outpatient setting, it is recommended to inform the patient about the need to limit physical activity in order to adhere to the prescribed rest and protection regimen (52).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
In mild OHSS managed in an outpatient setting, it is recommended to inform the patient about the need for a fluid intake of at least 1 L per day to normalize the water-electrolyte balance (1, 8, 9).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
In mild OHSS managed in an outpatient setting, it is recommended to inform the patient about the need to consume protein-rich foods to prevent and correct hypoproteinemia (1, 8, 9).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Recommended wearing of elastic compression stockings on the lower extremities to prevent thromboembolic events (TEE) (53).
GPP CLoE 5Level of Evidence/Grade of Recommendation C (level of evidence - 5).
In severe and critical OHSS, nutritional support with standard balanced formulas is recommended (54), (55), (56), (57).
GPP CLoE 5Level of Evidence/Grade of Recommendation C (level of evidence - 5).
Comments: Total caloric intake must cover protein requirements at 1.2–1.5 g/kg/day. Carbohydrate intake must completely match protein utilization. Essential components of nutritional support include minerals, water-soluble and fat-soluble vitamins, which are also recommended for daily use (57).
3.2. Pharmacotherapy
In OHSS requiring inpatient treatment (see Appendix B), intravenous administration of 0.9% sodium chloride solution** is recommended to normalize the water-electrolyte balance (22, 23), (58), (59).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comments: Currently, there is no compelling evidence regarding the advantages of any specific fluid affecting the water-electrolyte balance (crystalloids), not only in the treatment of OHSS but also in other critical conditions (60), (61), (62), (63). The choice of solution is determined by electrolyte imbalance. In hyponatremia (sodium <135 mmol/L), 0.9% sodium chloride solution** is preferred. The volume of infusion therapy should be directly dependent on the degree of hypovolemia and overt fluid losses (volume of ascites, hydrothorax, vomiting, diuresis) or occult losses (inability to take fluids enterally). At the same time, a large volume of administered fluid and aggressive infusion therapy provoke the progression of polyserositis and may contribute to the worsening of intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) (29, 32, 64, 65). Following hemodynamic stabilization, normalization of plasma colloid-oncotic pressure and electrolyte disorders, and restoration of diuresis, the volume of intravenously administered fluid should be reduced as early as the first hours (day) of hospitalization, and enteral fluid intake and nutritional support should be initiated (8, 22, 23, 29, 57).
In OHSS requiring inpatient treatment with pronounced hemoconcentration (hematocrit >45%), hypoalbuminemia (albumin <25 g/L), or severe ascites with elevated intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), intravenous administration of 20% human albumin solution** at a dose of 2–4 mL/kg as a plasma-substituting agent is recommended (66), (23).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comments: The dosing regimen for human albumin** depends on concomitant factors and complications (23, 24, 30, 52). Routine use of human albumin** for the correction of hypoalbuminemia is not recommended. Absolute indications for prescribing human albumin** are the presence of ascites and hypoalbuminemia (<25 g/L). The advisability of administering human albumin** to correct hypovolemia in critically ill patients remains an unresolved issue (67).
If pain is present, prescribing paracetamol** is recommended for pain relief (8, 23, 29).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comments: Severe pain can be a symptom of other acute conditions: ovarian torsion and rupture, ectopic pregnancy, acute appendicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, which necessitates a surgical consultation. The use of other analgesics and antipyretics is not recommended due to contraindications for use during pregnancy (5, 8, 23, 29).
In the presence of nausea and vomiting, prescribing metoclopramide** is recommended for their relief (68).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: Metoclopramide** is not contraindicated for use during pregnancy according to the product instructions.
#Hydroxyethyl starch** is not recommended for the treatment of OHSS (66), (69).
GPP CLoE 5Level of Evidence/Grade of Recommendation C (level of evidence - 5).
#Dextran** is not recommended for the treatment of OHSS due to the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (22, 23).
GPP CLoE 5Level of Evidence/Grade of Recommendation C (level of evidence - 5).
Diuretics are not recommended for reducing ascites due to the risk of dehydration and thromboembolic events (8, 22, 23, 29).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: The administration of diuretics is possible in the presence of persistent oliguria only after adequate replacement of circulating blood volume, with a hematocrit level <38% and in the absence of tense ascites (8, 22, 23, 29).
In patients at high risk for OHSS after transvaginal oocyte retrieval (TVOR) and upon the development of OHSS, it is recommended to prescribe heparin sodium**, or enoxaparin sodium**, or nadroparin calcium, or dalteparin sodium in prophylactic doses for the prevention of thromboembolic events (70), (71), (72), (73), (39).
GCR BLEL 3Recommendation Grade B (Level of Evidence — 3).
Comments: The duration of thromboprophylaxis is individual and is determined by coagulogram parameters, risk factors, and the onset of pregnancy.
In case of risk of secondary infection, especially in critically ill patients, with unstable hemodynamics, and with a recurrent fever of ≥38oC, antibacterial therapy is recommended (34), (44), (74).
LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).
Comments: The duration of antibiotic therapy is individual and is determined by pathogen susceptibility and the onset of pregnancy. Empirical antibiotics should have a broad spectrum of activity against the most common bacteria in this population, including E. coli, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, P. mirabilis, and P. vulgaris. The initial regimen includes 3rd-generation (J01DDD) or 4th-generation (J01DE) cephalosporins combined with metronidazole**. Antibacterial therapy should be adjusted 48–72 hours after the start of treatment if there is no improvement in clinical and laboratory parameters indicating a positive disease trend and/or if the pathogen is resistant to the administered therapy (23), (75).
In spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, empirical antibacterial therapy is recommended prior to obtaining the results of microbiological (culture) testing (47).
LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).
Comments: Empirical antibacterial therapy should be initiated immediately after the diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis is established. The most common pathogens are gram-negative aerobic bacteria (e.g., E. coli); first-line antibiotics include cefotaxime** 2 g intravenously every 12 hours (ceftriaxone**, ceftazidime** may be used).
3.3. Surgical treatment
Removal of ascitic fluid (ultrasound-guided abdominal or vaginal paracentesis) and/or ultrasound-guided thoracentesis is recommended in case of progressive ascites and/or hydrothorax, and oliguria against the background of ascites/hydrothorax, despite adequate infusion therapy, in order to reduce intra-abdominal pressure and renal vascular resistance (8), (21, 23, 29, 32, 76), (59) (Appendix G2).
LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence - 4).
Termination of pregnancy is recommended in critical ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) to save the patient's life (5, 8, 23, 29).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Surgical treatment of acute surgical conditions—adnexal torsion, ovarian cyst rupture, ovarian cyst hemorrhage, ectopic pregnancy—is recommended to save the patient's life (8, 29).
GPP CLoE 5Level of Evidence/Grade of Recommendation C (level of evidence - 5).
Comment: For adnexal torsion, a minimally invasive surgical approach with detorsion and ovarian preservation is recommended. Adnexectomy is performed only when oophorectomy is unavoidable, such as in cases of severe ovarian necrosis. Ovariopexy may be considered in situations where the ovarian ligament is congenitally long, in patients with recurrent torsion, or when an obvious cause of adnexal torsion cannot be found (77), (78).
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
Not applicable.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
To correctly prescribe the ovarian stimulation regimen and final oocyte maturation trigger in patients undergoing ART programs, it is recommended to assess OHSS risk factors: age <35 years, presence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), anti-Müllerian hormone level >3.4 ng/mL, antral follicle count >24 in both ovaries, history of OHSS in previous ovarian stimulation cycles, and body mass index <18 kg/m2 (1), (8).
GCR ALeE 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence - 1).
Comments: Patients with excessive ovarian reserve and/or PCOS must be informed that they are at high risk for OHSS.
An ovarian stimulation protocol using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists (ganirelix**, cetrorelix**) is recommended for patients with excessive ovarian reserve for the prevention of OHSS (8), (79), (80), (81).
GCR ALeE 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence - 1).
During ovarian stimulation, it is recommended to prescribe low starting doses of gonadotropins (follitropin alfa**, follitropin beta, urofollitropin, follitropin delta, menotropins) to patients with excessive ovarian reserve for the prevention of OHSS (82).
GCR ALeE 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence - 1).
It is not recommended to stop gonadotropin administration for 2–4 days (coasting method — a wait-and-see approach) prior to administering the final oocyte maturation trigger in patients with an excessive ovarian response to ovarian stimulation for the prevention of OHSS (1), (8).
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5Level of Evidence C (Reliability level of evidence - 5).
It is recommended to prescribe gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists (buserelin**, triptorelin**) as a trigger for final oocyte maturation during ovarian stimulation in patients with an excessive ovarian response to prevent OHSS (8), (83), (84).
LeveL of Recommendation BGrade of Evidence 2LeveL of Recommendation B (Grade of Evidence - 2).
Comment: An excessive ovarian response to stimulation is characterized by the presence of >18 follicles measuring ≥11 mm on the day of the final oocyte maturation trigger injection and/or >18 oocytes retrieved during transvaginal puncture (8), (83), (84), (85).
It is not recommended to use a lower dose of the final oocyte maturation trigger containing only hCG** for the purpose of preventing OHSS (1), (8).
GPP CLoE 5Level of Evidence/Grade of Recommendation C (level of evidence - 5).
It is not recommended to replace hCG** with choriogonadotropin alfa as a trigger for final oocyte maturation for the purpose of preventing OHSS (1), (86).
GCR ALeE 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence - 1).
It is recommended to take into account the number of follicles with a diameter of >12 mm according to ultrasound of the uterus and appendages and the number of oocytes retrieved during transvaginal puncture after ovarian stimulation for the timely diagnosis of OHSS (1,8,23,29).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
It is recommended to cancel embryo transfer and cryopreserve embryos if any are obtained in the current ovarian stimulation cycle (segmentation of the cycle) in patients with an excessive ovarian response to ovarian stimulation for the purpose of preventing OHSS (8).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: After transvaginal puncture, GnRH antagonists (ganirelix**, cetrorelix**) can be prescribed starting from the day of puncture for 5–8 days at a dose of 0.25 mg/day subcutaneously or 0.5–0.75 mg once on the day of puncture (within 2 hours after puncture) in case of an excessive ovarian response to ovarian stimulation and cycle segmentation for the purpose of preventing OHSS (87), (88), although this recommendation has controversial efficacy (89). The use of #letrozole for the prevention of OHSS has not yet received official recognition, but its administration at a dose of 7.5 mg daily for 5 days starting from the day of transvaginal puncture reduces the risk of OHSS in high-risk patients (90), (91), (92).
It is not recommended to prescribe #cabergoline for the prevention of OHSS when using GnRH agonists (triptorelin**, buserelin**) as a trigger for final oocyte maturation (8).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: #Cabergoline for the prevention of OHSS can be prescribed in an ovarian stimulation protocol with an hCG trigger in case of an excessive ovarian response at a dose of 0.5 mg orally once daily for 5–8 days starting from the day of the final oocyte maturation trigger injection or the day after transvaginal puncture (93).
It is not recommended to prescribe #calcium gluconate** for the prevention of OHSS when using GnRH agonists (triptorelin**, buserelin**) as a trigger for final oocyte maturation (94).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
Comment: #Calcium gluconate** for the prevention of OHSS can be prescribed in an ovarian stimulation protocol with an hCG trigger in case of an excessive ovarian response for 3 days intravenously by drip 1 time per day at a dose of 10 ml of a 10% solution per 200 ml of sodium chloride** solution (95).
It is not recommended to test blood total estradiol levels to determine the risk of OHSS (96).
GCR ALeE 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence - 1).
It is not recommended to prescribe adjuvant therapy with systemic hormonal contraceptives containing progestogens and estrogens, #estradiol valerate, #estradiol, #progesterone**, #dydrogesterone** before the ovarian stimulation protocol for the purpose of preventing OHSS (97).
LeR ALoE 1Level of Evidence Recommendation A (Level of Evidence - 1).
It is not recommended to prescribe #metformin** to patients with PCOS in protocols with GnRH antagonists for the purpose of preventing OHSS (8), (98).
GPP ALEL 1Level of Evidence A (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 1).
Comment: #Metformin** significantly reduces the risk of OHSS in protocols with GnRH agonists, but at the same time increases the risk of gastrointestinal side effects almost 3-fold. In protocols with GnRH antagonists, #metformin** does not reduce the risk of OHSS (8), (98).
It is not recommended to prescribe glucocorticoids or #mifepristone for the purpose of preventing OHSS (8), (99), (100).
LeveL of Recommendation AGrade of Evidence 2LeveL of Recommendation A (Grade of Evidence - 2).
It is not recommended to prescribe #acetylsalicylic acid** for the purpose of preventing OHSS (8).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
It is not recommended to prescribe human #albumin**, #hydroxyethyl starch** or #mannitol** for the purpose of preventing OHSS (8), (101), (102), (66).
GCP CLEL 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence - 5).
6. Organization of Medical Care
Treatment of patients with mild OHSS is carried out in an outpatient setting with dynamic monitoring.
Treatment of patients with moderate, severe, and critical OHSS is carried out in an inpatient setting.
Due to the pronounced polymorphism of clinical symptoms of OHSS and the likelihood of rapid deterioration of the patient's condition, it is advisable to hospitalize patients in specialized departments that have experience in managing such patients, access to an interdisciplinary approach, and the necessary list of medicines.
Treatment should be administered by physicians with clinical experience in managing this category of patients, since the clinical picture of OHSS has a pronounced polymorphism of clinical and laboratory symptoms and can change very rapidly toward worsening the patient's condition. Decisions on management tactics should be made quickly with a minimal probability of errors.
7. Additional Information
Not applicable.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria for OHSS prevention | Performance evaluation |
|---|---|---|
1 | Risk factors for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were assessed | Yes/No |
3 | A patient with excessive ovarian reserve was prescribed an ovarian stimulation protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists (ganirelix**, cetrorelix**) | Yes/No |
4 | A patient with excessive ovarian reserve underwent ovarian stimulation with low starting doses of gonadotropins (G03GA) | Yes/No |
5 | A patient with an excessive ovarian response to ovarian stimulation was prescribed gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (buserelin**, triptorelin**) as a trigger for final oocyte maturation | Yes/No |
6 | A patient with an excessive ovarian response to ovarian stimulation had embryo transfer cancelled and embryos cryopreserved if any were obtained in the current ovarian stimulation cycle | Yes/No |
№ | Quality assessment criteria for primary health care in OHSS | Performance evaluation |
|---|---|---|
1. | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by an obstetrician-gynecologist was scheduled | Yes/No |
2. | General (clinical) blood count was prescribed | Yes/No |
3. | General clinical blood chemistry test was prescribed (total protein, albumin, free and conjugated bilirubin, glucose, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium) | |
4. | Coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis test) was prescribed | Yes/No |
5. | Blood serum human chorionic gonadotropin (free beta-subunit) level test was prescribed | Yes/No |
6. | General (clinical) urinalysis was prescribed | |
7. | Complex pelvic ultrasound (transvaginal and transabdominal) was prescribed | Yes/No |
8. | Initial appointment (examination, consultation) by a general practitioner was scheduled | Yes/No |
9. | Elastic compression of the lower extremities was prescribed | Yes/No |
10. | Heparin group drugs in prophylactic doses were prescribed (depending on medical indications and in the absence of medical contraindications) | Yes/No |
№ | Quality assessment criteria for specialized medical care in OHSS | Performance evaluation |
|---|---|---|
1. | Daily examination by an obstetrician-gynecologist was performed, with monitoring and nursing care by junior and intermediate medical staff in the inpatient department | Yes/No |
2. | Complete blood count performed | Yes/No |
3. | General clinical blood chemistry test was performed (total protein, albumin, free and conjugated bilirubin, glucose, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium) | Yes/No |
4. | Coagulogram (exploratory assessment of hemostasis) performed | Yes/No |
5. | Blood serum human chorionic gonadotropin (free beta-subunit) level test was performed | Yes/No |
6. | A general (clinical) urinalysis was performed | Yes/No |
7. | A study of the C-reactive protein level in blood serum was performed | Yes/No |
8. | Comprehensive pelvic ultrasound was performed (transvaginal and transabdominal) | Yes/No |
9. | A comprehensive abdominal ultrasound was performed | Yes/No |
10. | Electrocardiogram recording performed | Yes/No |
11. | Initial general practitioner examination (inspection, consultation) was performed | Yes/No |
12. | Initial surgical consultation and examination performed | Yes/No |
13. | Initial examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitator was performed | Yes/No |
14. | Elastic compression of the lower extremities was performed | Yes/No |
15. | Treatment with heparin group drugs in prophylactic doses was performed (in the absence of medical contraindications) | Yes/No |
16. | Treatment with 0.9% sodium chloride** solution (intravenous administration) was performed (depending on medical indications and in the absence of medical contraindications) | Yes/No |
17. | Antibiotic therapy was performed (in case of risk of secondary infection, unstable hemodynamics, recurrent body temperature elevation ≥38 degrees C) (depending on medical indications and in the absence of medical contraindications) | Yes/No |
References
Show references
Boothroyd C, Karia S, Andreadis N, Rombauts L, Johnson N, Chapman M. Consensus statement on prevention and detection of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;55(6):523–34.
Pfeifer S, Butts S, Dumesic D, Fossum G, Gracia C, La Barbera A, et al. Prevention of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a guideline. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2024 Feb;121(2):230–45. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028223020022
Tan BK, Mathur R. Management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Produced on behalf of the BFS Policy and Practice Committee. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2013 Sep;16(3):151–9.
Carter R, Petrie K, Sadighi A, Skene H. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome on the acute medical unit: a problem-based review. Acute Med. 2015;14(1):21–7.
Namavar Jahromi B, Parsanezhad ME, Shomali Z, Bakhshai P, Alborzi M, Moin Vaziri N, et al. Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome: A Narrative Review of Its Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, Prevention, Classification, and Management. Iran J Med Sci. 2018 May;43(3):248–60.
Nazarenko TA, Korneeva IE, Saroyan TT, Veryaeva NA. Spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in single pregnancy. Problems of Reproduction. 2009;15(1):72–5.
Vasseur C, Rodien P, Beau I, Desroches A, Gérard C, de Poncheville L, et al. A chorionic gonadotropin-sensitive mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor as a cause of familial gestational spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2003;349(8):753–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12930927
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: ASRM@asrm.org, Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Prevention of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a guideline. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2024 Feb;121(2):230–45. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27678032
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Reducing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism during Pregnancy and the Puerperium. RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 37a April 2015. 40 p.
Nelson SM. Prevention and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Thromb Res. 2017 Mar;151 Suppl:S61–4.
Corbett S, Shmorgun D, Claman P, REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY INFERTILITY COMMITTEE, SPECIAL CONTRIBUTOR. The prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Nov;36(11):1024–33.
Ironside EC, Hotchen AJ. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, the master of disguise? Case Rep Emerg Med. 2015;2015:510815.
Gibreel A, Maheshwari A, Bhattacharya S. Clomiphene citrate in combination with gonadotropins for controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD008528.
Daelemans C, Smits G, de Maertelaer V, Costagliola S, Englert Y, Vassart G, et al. Prediction of severity of symptoms in iatrogenic ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome by follicle-stimulating hormone receptor Ser680Asn polymorphism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab [Internet]. 2004;89(12):6310–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15579795
Topdagi Yilmaz EP, Yapca OE, Topdagi YE, Kaya Topdagi S, Kumtepe Y. Spontaneous Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome with FSH Receptor Gene Mutation: Two Rare Case Reports. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Oct;2018:1–5.
Rizk B. Symposium: Update on prediction and management of OHSS. Genetics of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Jul;19(1):14–27.
Stouffs K, Daelemans S, Santos-Ribeiro S, Seneca S, Gheldof A, Gürbüz AS, et al. Rare genetic variants potentially involved in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Mar;36(3):491–7.
Petrenko AP, Castelo-Branco C, Marshalov DV, Kuligin AV, Shifman EM, Nesnova ES. Assessing the Usefulness of Severity Markers in Women with Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. Reprod Sci [Internet]. 2021 Apr 15;28(4):1041–8. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43032-020-00339-8
Wei L-H, Chou C-H, Chen M-W, Rose-John S, Kuo M-L, Chen S-U, et al. The role of IL-6 trans-signaling in vascular leakage: implications for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in a murine model. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Mar;98(3):E472-84.
Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, Jaeschke R, Malbrain MLNG, De Keulenaer B, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: Updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39(7):1190–206.
Maslovitz S, Jaffa A, Eytan O, Wolman I, Many A, Lessing JB, et al. Renal blood flow alteration after paracentesis in women with ovarian hyperstimulation. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Aug;104(2):321–6.
Budev MM, Arroliga AC, Falcone T. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Crit Care Med [Internet]. 2005;33(10 Suppl):S301--6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16215351
Timmons D, Montrief T, Koyfman A, Long B. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A review for emergency clinicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(8):1577–84.
Sukhikh GT, Saroyan TT, Korneeva IE. Immune aspects of the pathophysiology of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2009;(3):3–6.
Papanikolaou EG, Pozzobon C, Kolibianakis EM, Camus M, Tournaye H, Fatemi HM, et al. Incidence and prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2006 Jan;85(1):112–20. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028205034369
Toftager M, Bogstad J, Bryndorf T, Løssl K, Roskær J, Holland T, et al. Risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol: RCT including 1050 first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2016 Jun;31(6):1253–64. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/humrep/dew051
Ioannidou PG, Bosdou JK, Lainas GT, Lainas TG, Grimbizis GF, Kolibianakis EM. How frequent is severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome after GnRH agonist triggering in high-risk women? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online [Internet]. 2021 Mar;42(3):635–50. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1472648320306246
Russian Association of Human Reproduction. ART Register. Report for 2021. https://www.rahr.ru/d_registr_otchet/RegistrVRT_2021.pdf.
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Management of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. Green-top Guideline No. 5. February 2016. 22 p.
Grossman LC, Michalakis KG, Browne H, Payson MD, Segars JH. The pathophysiology of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: an unrecognized compartment syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2010 Sep;94(4):1392–8.
Veisi F, Zangeneh M, Malekkhosravi S, Rezavand N. Abdominal Compartment Syndrome Due to OHSS. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2013 Oct;63(5):350–3.
Makino H, Furui T, Shiga T, Takenaka M, Terazawa K, Morishige K-I. Management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with abdominal compartment syndrome, based on intravesical pressure measurement. Reprod Med Biol. 2017;16(1):72–6.
Nazarenko TA, Korneeva IE, Aksenenko AA, Sokolova MYu. Liver dysfunction in a patient with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Problems of Reproduction. 2009;15(3):70–3.
Abramov Y, Elchalal U, Schenker JG. Febrile morbidity in severe and critical ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a multicentre study. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 1998;13(11):3128–31. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9853869
Veryaeva NA, Korneeva IE, Ankirskaya AS, Koroleva TE. Evaluation of the role of the microbial factor and diagnostic value of the procalcitonin test in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Problems of Reproduction. 2009;15(3):35–9.
Nelson SM. Venous thrombosis during assisted reproduction: novel risk reduction strategies. Thromb Res [Internet]. 2013;131 Suppl:S1--3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23452730
Stölzel K, Jovanovic S, Albers AE. [Jugular vein thrombosis caused by hypercoagulability following in-vitro fertilization-activated protein C resistance and immobilization]. HNO [Internet]. 2013;61(3):250–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22532279
Mor YS, Schenker JG. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and thrombotic events. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014 Dec;72(6):541–8.
Sennström M, Rova K, Hellgren M, Hjertberg R, Nord E, Thurn L, et al. Thromboembolism and in vitro fertilization - a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand [Internet]. 2017;96(9):1045–52. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28382684
Grandone E, Di Micco PP, Villani M, Colaizzo D, Fernández-Capitán C, Del Toro J, et al. Venous Thromboembolism in Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Data from the RIETE Registry. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Nov;118(11):1962–8.
Chan WS. The “ART” of thrombosis: a review of arterial and venous thrombosis in assisted reproductive technology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2009;21(3):207–18. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19276806
Kwik M, Karia S, Boothroyd C. RANZCOG CREI Consensus Statement on treatment of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol [Internet]. 2015;55(5):413–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26279582
Saroyan TT, Korneeva IE. [Management tactics for induced pregnancy occurring against the background of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome]. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya. 2011;(8):107–11. (In Russ.)
Korneeva IE, Veryaeva NA. [Complex therapy for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome]. Vrach. 2006;(9):54–5. (In Russ.)
Chistyakova GN, Remizova II, Gazieva IA, Chermyaninova OV. Immunological and hemostasiological disorders in women with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol [Internet]. 2014 Oct 9;30(sup1):39–42. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/09513590.2014.945787
Li S, Qian Y, Pei Y, Wu K, Lu S. Coagulation and Fibrinolysis Biomarkers as Potential Indicators for the Diagnosis and Classification of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. Front Med [Internet]. 2021 Aug 25;8. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmed.2021.720342/full
Rimola A, García-Tsao G, Navasa M, Piddock LJV, Planas R, Bernard B, et al. Diagnosis, treatment and prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: a consensus document. J Hepatol [Internet]. 2000 Jan;32(1):142–53. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168827800802019
Vujisić S, Kupešić S, Mihaljević D, Akšamija A, Kurjak A. Evaluation of Serum CA 125 Concentration Before and During Hormonal Induced Cycles as Predictor of IVF/ET Outcome. Am J Reprod Immunol [Internet]. 2002 Dec 9;48(6):355–60. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1034/j.1600-0897.2002.01088.x
Gulec UK, Paydas S, Guzel AB, Vardar MA, Urunsak IF, Cetin MT. The relationship between ovarian volume and serum CA-125 levels. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol [Internet]. 2014;35(3):280–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24984541
Selter J, Wen T, Palmerola KL, Friedman AM, Williams Z, Forman EJ. Life-threatening complications among women with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2019 Jun;220(6):575.e1-575.e11. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002937819303503
Irvine LM. Spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): A rare but important differential diagnosis for abdominal distension in early pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore) [Internet]. 2011 May 2;31(4):338–9. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/01443615.2011.560299
Anshina MB, Isakova EV, Kalinina EAndr, et al. [Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Clinical guidelines]. Problemy Reproduktsii. 2013;(2):8‑14. (In Russ.)
Kasum M, Danolić D, Orešković S, Ježek D, Beketić-Orešković L, Pekez M. Thrombosis following ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol [Internet]. 2014 Nov 11;30(11):764–8. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/09513590.2014.927858
Lheureux O, Preiser J-C. Role of Nutrition Support in Inflammatory Conditions. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;32(3):310–7.
"Methodological Recommendations. Enteral Nutrition in the Treatment of Surgical and Therapeutic Patients" (approved by the Russian Ministry of Health and Social Development on Dec 8, 2006, No. 6530-RKh). (In Russ.)
Reintam Blaser A, Starkopf J, Alhazzani W, Berger MM, Casaer MP, Deane AM, et al. Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: ESICM clinical practice guidelines. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):380–98.
Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, et al. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(3):623–50.
Soni N. British Consensus Guidelines on Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Adult Surgical Patients (GIFTASUP): Cassandra’s view. Anaesthesia [Internet]. 2009;64(3):235–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19302633
Shmorgun D, Claman P. No-268-The Diagnosis and Management of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada [Internet]. 2017 Nov;39(11):e479–86. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1701216317309325
Tseng C-H, Chen T-T, Wu M-Y, Chan M-C, Shih M-C, Tu Y-K. Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses. Crit Care [Internet]. 2020 Dec 14;24(1):693. Available from: https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-020-03419-y
Noonpradej S, Akaraborworn O. Intravenous Fluid of Choice in Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review. Crit Care Res Pract [Internet]. 2020 Aug 3;2020:1–19. Available from: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ccrp/2020/2170828/
Tyagi A, Maitra S, Bhattacharjee S. Comparison of colloid and crystalloid using goal-directed fluid therapy protocol in non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Anesth [Internet]. 2020 Dec 27;34(6):865–75. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00540-020-02832-5
Zwager CL, Tuinman PR, de Grooth H-J, Kooter J, Ket H, Fleuren LM, et al. Why physiology will continue to guide the choice between balanced crystalloids and normal saline: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care [Internet]. 2019 Dec 21;23(1):366. Available from: https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-019-2658-4
Lincoln SR, Opsahl MS, Blauer KL, Black SH, Schulman JD. Aggressive outpatient treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with ascites using transvaginal culdocentesis and intravenous albumin minimizes hospitalization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002 Apr;19(4):159–63.
Marshalov DV, Salov IA, Petrenko AP, Shifman EM, Salyukov RR BM. [The effect of intra-abdominal hypertension on the outcomes of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome]. Anesteziologiya i Reanimatologiya. Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya. 2013;(6):42–7. (In Russ.)
Youssef MA, Mourad S. Volume expanders for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2016;(8):CD001302.
Abedi F, Zarei B, Elyasi S. Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use. Eur J Clin Pharmacol [Internet]. 2024 Aug 12;80(8):1151–69. Available from: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00228-024-03664-y
Sun L, Xi Y, Wen X, Zou W. Use of metoclopramide in the first trimester and risk of major congenital malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lupattelli A, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021 Sep 20;16(9):e0257584. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257584
Gamzu R, Almog B, Levin Y, Avni A, Lessing JB, Baram A. Efficacy of hydroxyethyl starch and haemaccel for the treatment of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2002;77(6):1302–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12057749
Afshari A, Ageno W, Ahmed A, Duranteau J, Faraoni D, Kozek-Langenecker S, et al. European Guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Executive summary. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Feb;35(2):77–83.
Wormer KC, Jangda AA, El Sayed FA, Stewart KI, Mumford SL, Segars JH. Is thromboprophylaxis cost effective in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: A systematic review and cost analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 May;224:117–24.
Filipovic-Pierucci A, Gabet A, Deneux-Tharaux C, Plu-Bureau G, Olié V. Arterial and venous complications after fertility treatment: A French nationwide cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol [Internet]. 2019 Jun;237:57–63. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S030121151930106X
Villani M, Favuzzi G, Totaro P, Chinni E, Vecchione G, Vergura P, et al. Venous thromboembolism in assisted reproductive technologies: comparison between unsuccessful versus successful cycles in an Italian cohort. J Thromb Thrombolysis [Internet]. 2018 Feb 23;45(2):234–9. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11239-017-1584-z
European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines on the management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and hepatorenal syndrome in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2010 Sep;53(3):397–417.
AMR Control Program (Antimicrobial Therapy Control Strategy) in Inpatient Medical Care: Russian Clinical Guidelines / Ed. by S.V. Yakovlev, N.I. Briko, S.V. Sidorenko, D.N. Protsenko. – M.: Pero Publishing House, 2018. – 156 p.
Malbrain M, De Waele J. Intra-Abdominal Hypertension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
Guile SL, Mathai JK. Ovarian Torsion [Internet]. StatPearls. 2024. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31563207
Kives S, Gascon S, Dubuc É, Van Eyk N. No. 341-Diagnosis and Management of Adnexal Torsion in Children, Adolescents, and Adults. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada [Internet]. 2017 Feb;39(2):82–90. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1701216316397250
Al-Inany HG, Youssef MA, Ayeleke RO, Brown J, Lam WS, Broekmans FJ. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2016;4:CD001750.
Lambalk CB, Banga FR, Huirne JA, Toftager M, Pinborg A, Homburg R, et al. GnRH antagonist versus long agonist protocols in IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for patient type. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(5):560–79.
Xing W, Lin H, Li Y, Yang D, Wang W, Zhang Q. Is the GnRH Antagonist Protocol Effective at Preventing OHSS for Potentially High Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI? PLoS One [Internet]. 2015;10(10):e0140286. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468951
Lensen SF, Wilkinson J, Leijdekkers JA, La Marca A, Mol BWJ, Marjoribanks J, et al. Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2018;2:CD012693.
Engmann L, DiLuigi A, Schmidt D, Nulsen J, Maier D, Benadiva C. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce oocyte maturation after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist in high-risk patients undergoing in vitro fertilization prevents the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a prospective rando. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2008;89(1):84–91. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17462639
Melo M, Busso CE, Bellver J, Alama P, Garrido N, Meseguer M, et al. GnRH agonist versus recombinant HCG in an oocyte donation programme: a randomized, prospective, controlled, assessor-blind study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009 Oct;19(4):486–92.
Bosch E, Broer S, Griesinger G, Grynberg M, Humaidan P, Kolibianakis E, et al. ESHRE guideline: ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI†. Hum Reprod Open [Internet]. 2020 Feb 1;2020(2). Available from: https://academic.oup.com/hropen/article/doi/10.1093/hropen/hoaa009/5827574
Mochtar MH, Van der Veen, Ziech M, van Wely M. Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone (rLH) for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive cycles. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr;(2):CD005070.
Lainas GT, Kolibianakis EM, Sfontouris IA, Zorzovilis IZ, Petsas GK, Tarlatzi TB, et al. Outpatient management of severe early OHSS by administration of GnRH antagonist in the luteal phase: an observational cohort study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol [Internet]. 2012 Dec 31;10(1):69. Available from: https://rbej.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1477-7827-10-69
Hosseini MA, Mahdavi A, Aleyasin A, Safdarian L, Bahmaee F. Treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome using gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist: a pilot study. Gynecol Endocrinol [Internet]. 2012 Nov 14;28(11):853–5. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/09513590.2012.683076
Zeng C, Shang J, Jin A-M, Wu P-L, Li X, Xue Q. The effect of luteal GnRH antagonist on moderate and severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome during in vitro fertilization treatment: a prospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet [Internet]. 2019 Jul 19;300(1):223–33. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-019-05163-3
Choudhary RA, Vora PH, Darade KK, Pandey S, Ganla KN. A Prospective Randomised Comparative Clinical Trial Study of Luteal PhaseLetrozole versus Ganirelix Acetate Administration to Prevent Severity of Early Onset OHSS in ARTs. Int J Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2021 Oct;15(4):263–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34913294
Zhao J, Xu B, Huang X, Yan Y, Li Y. Whether Letrozole could reduce the incidence of early ovary hyperstimulation syndrome after assisted reproductive technology? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Health [Internet]. 2020 Dec 20;17(1):181. Available from: https://reproductive-health-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12978-020-01042-2
Di Guardo F, Lello C, Incognito GG, Bruno MT, Palumbo M. Letrozole and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS): A Promising Prevention Strategy. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2023 Jan 12;12(2):614. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/2/614
Leitao VMS, Moroni RM, Seko LMD, Nastri CO, Martins WP. Cabergoline for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2014;101(3):664–75. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24360566
Turktekin N, Karakus C, Ozyurt R. Calcium gluconate infusion is not as effective as dopamine agonists in preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci [Internet]. 2022 Feb;26(4):1248–54. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35253181
Fouda UM, Elshaer HS, Youssef GG, Hanafy A, Mehrem WM, Youssef MA, et al. Cabergoline versus calcium infusion in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a randomised controlled study. J Obstet Gynaecol (Lahore) [Internet]. 2022 Jan 2;42(1):122–6. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01443615.2020.1870944
Kwan I, Bhattacharya S, Kang A, Woolner A. Monitoring of stimulated cycles in assisted reproduction (IVF and ICSI). Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug;(8):CD005289.
Smulders B, van Oirschot SM, Farquhar C, Rombauts L, Kremer JA. Oral contraceptive pill, progestogen or estrogen pre-treatment for ovarian stimulation protocols for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan;(1):CD006109.
Tso LO, Costello MF, Albuquerque LET, Andriolo RB, Macedo CR. Metformin treatment before and during IVF or ICSI in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2014 Nov 18; Available from: https://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD006105.pub3
Tan S-L, Balen A, Hussein E El, Campbell S, Jacobs HS. The administration of glucocorticoids for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 1992 Aug;58(2):378–83. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0015028216552236
Wang Y-Q, Luo J, Xu W-M, Xie Q-Z, Yan W-J, Wu G-X, et al. Can steroidal ovarian suppression during the luteal phase after oocyte retrieval reduce the risk of severe OHSS? J Ovarian Res [Internet]. 2015 Dec 23;8(1):63. Available from: http://ovarianresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13048-015-0190-y
Chen C-D, Chao K-H, Yang J-H, Chen S-U, Ho H-N, Yang Y-S. Comparison of coasting and intravenous albumin in the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril [Internet]. 2003 Jul;80(1):86–90. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S001502820300548X
Bellver J. Intravenous albumin does not prevent moderate-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in high-risk IVF patients: a randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod [Internet]. 2003 Nov 1;18(11):2283–8. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/humrep/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/humrep/deg451
Malbrain MLNG, Cheatham ML, Kirkpatrick A, Sugrue M, Parr M, De Waele J, et al. Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. I. Definitions. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Nov;32(11):1722–32.
Burch JM, Moore EE, Moore FA, Franciose R. The abdominal compartment syndrome. Surg Clin North Am. 1996 Aug;76(4):833–42.
Vlahos NF, Gregoriou O. Prevention and management of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Dec;1092:247–64.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
1. Korneeva Irina Evgenyevna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher at the F. Paulsen Sr. Scientific and Clinical Department of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Institute of Reproductive Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.
2. Dolgushina Nataliya Vitalievna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Deputy Director for Research, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in women's reproductive health of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.
3. Korsak Vladislav Stanislavovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, General Director of the International Center for Reproductive Medicine JSC, President of the Russian Association of Human Reproduction (RAHR) (Saint Petersburg). No conflict of interest.
4. Nazarenko Tatyana Alekseevna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Director of the Institute of Reproductive Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.
5. Shabanova Natalya Evgenyevna – Ph.D. in Medicine, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Clinical Pharmacology of Antimicrobial and Immunobiological Drugs, Institute of Microbiology, Antimicrobial Therapy and Epidemiology, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow). No conflict of interest.
6. Artymuk Natalya Vladimirovna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology named after Professor G.A. Ushakova, Kemerovo State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in obstetrics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in gynecology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in women's reproductive health in the Siberian Federal District (Kemerovo). No conflict of interest.
7. Bazina Marina Ivanovna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Postgraduate Education, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in reproductive health of the Ministry of Health of Krasnoyarsk Krai (Krasnoyarsk). No conflict of interest.
8. Bashmakova Nadezhda Vasilievna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Chief Researcher, Ural Research Institute for Maternal and Infant Welfare of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in obstetrics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in gynecology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in women's reproductive health in the Ural Federal District. No conflict of interest.
9. Belokrinitskaya Tatyana Evgenyevna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Additional Professional Education, Chita State Medical Academy of the Russian Ministry of Health, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Chief freelance specialist in obstetrics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in gynecology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in women's reproductive health in the Far Eastern Federal District (Chita). No conflict of interest.
10. Kalugina Alla Stanislavovna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Professor at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, First Saint Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I.P. Pavlov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Saint Petersburg), Chief freelance specialist in women's reproductive health in the Northwestern Federal District. No conflict of interest.
11. Krasnopolskaya Ksenia Vladislavovna – Corresponding Member of the RAS, D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Head of the Department of Reproductology at MONIIAG, Chief freelance specialist in women's reproductive health of the Ministry of Health of Moscow Region (Moscow). No conflict of interest.
12. Malyshkina Anna Ivanovna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Director of the Ivanovo Research Institute of Motherhood and Childhood named after V.N. Gorodkov, Head of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Medical Genetics of the Faculty of Medicine, Ivanovo State Medical Academy of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in obstetrics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in gynecology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in women's reproductive health in the Central Federal District (Ivanovo). No conflict of interest.
13. Moiseeva Irina Valerievna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Head of the Department of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Samara Regional Medical Center "Dynasty", Chief freelance specialist in reproductive health of the Ministry of Health of Samara Region, Chief freelance specialist in women's reproductive health in the Privolzhsky Federal District (Samara). No conflict of interest.
14. Popandopulo Viktoriya Alexandrovna – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maykop State Technological University, Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Faculty of Medicine, Astrakhan State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief Medical Officer of Kuban Medical Center LLC, Chief freelance specialist in obstetrics of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in gynecology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in women's reproductive health in the Southern Federal District (Krasnodar). No conflict of interest.
15. Smirnova Anna Anatolyevna – Ph.D. in Medicine, Associate Professor at the Department of Women's Diseases and Reproductive Health, Institute of Advanced Training of Doctors, National Medical and Surgical Center named after N.I. Pirogov, Chief reproductologist of the federal network "Fomin Clinics" (Moscow). No conflict of interest.
16. Kulikov Alexander Veniaminovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Head of the Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Toxicology, Ural State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health (Yekaterinburg).
17. Marshalov Dmitry Vasilievich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Associate Professor at the Department of Simulation Technologies and Emergency Medicine, Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the City Center for Clinical Hemostasiology and Transfusiology, Excellence in Public Health (Saratov).
15. Petrenko Alexey Petrovich – Ph.D. in Medicine, Associate Professor at the Department of Emergency, Urgent, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky of the Russian Ministry of Health (Saratov).
16. Pyregov Alexey Viktorovich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Deputy Chief Medical Officer for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Moscow Regional Perinatal Center. Chairman of the Committee on Anesthesiology and Intensive Care in Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Association of Anesthesiologists-Reanimatologists (Moscow). No conflict of interest.
17. Silaev Borislav Vladimirovich – Ph.D. in Medicine, Head of the Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health (Moscow).
18. Shifman Efim Munevich – D.Sc. in Medicine, Professor, Professor at the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Advanced Medical Training, Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute (MONIKI) named after M.F. Vladimirsky, President of the Association of Obstetric Anesthesiologists-Reanimatologists, Honored Doctor of the Republic of Karelia, Expert in Anesthesiology and Intensive Care of the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare (Moscow).
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
obstetrician-gynecologists
obstetrician-gynecologist residents
anesthesiologists-reanimatologists
anesthesiology and intensive care residents
Table 1. Level of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Scale for assessing levels of reliable evidence (LRE) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, rehabilitation interventions)
LoE | Definitions |
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Grade of Recommendation (GoR) scale for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Not applicable.
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix C. Patient Information
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a complication of infertility treatment during ovulation induction in assisted reproductive technology programs. OHSS occurs when too many follicles (more than 18) mature in the ovaries during stimulation, releasing large amounts of female sex hormones (estrogens) into the bloodstream. High hormone levels in the blood alter vascular wall properties, making them permeable to the liquid portion of blood, which leads to fluid accumulation in the pelvic and abdominal cavities, and in some cases, in the pleural cavity (chest cavity).
The severity of symptoms increases as fluid accumulates and blood hemoconcentration worsens. Depending on the severity of manifestations, mild, moderate, and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome are distinguished. Patients are hospitalized in cases of moderate and severe OHSS. Mild OHSS occurs in approximately 30% of cases.
Main complaints:
- discomfort in the epigastric region (feeling of heaviness);
- minor deterioration in general well-being;
- nausea, vomiting;
- infrequent urination in small portions.
For the prevention and treatment of mild OHSS, it is sufficient to follow a sparing regimen, perform breathing exercises prescribed by the attending physician, maintain moderate physical activity (walking), eat a protein-rich diet (meat, fish, seafood, grains, nuts), regulate bowel movements, drink fluids, and if necessary, the physician may prescribe special outpatient treatment.
Fluid accumulation in the abdominal cavity leads to moderate OHSS. Complaints include weakness, weight gain, dyspnea on exertion, abdominal distension, infrequent urination in small portions (fluid retention), nausea, and sometimes vomiting and diarrhea. When these symptoms appear, hospitalization in a 24-hour inpatient facility is required for treatment. Typically, with infusion therapy over several days, the condition stabilizes and serious treatment is not required. However, in the event of pregnancy, a longer hospital stay may be required. If embryo implantation (attachment to the uterine wall) does not occur and pregnancy is not established, OHSS resolves with the onset of the next menstruation and rarely progresses to a severe form.
Severe OHSS occurs rarely—in only 0.2% of cases. Due to marked hemoconcentration resulting from massive fluid leakage out of the vessels, blood clotting increases, the risk of blood clots rises, and the function of many organs (kidneys, liver) is impaired.
The above complaints are accompanied by:
- dizziness, headache, floating spots before the eyes;
- severe bursting abdominal pain that worsens with movement or changes in body position;
- increased abdominal girth and tension due to fluid accumulation in the abdominal cavity;
- marked decrease in urine output;
- elevated body temperature (sometimes);
- repeated vomiting;
- decreased blood pressure;
- pronounced dyspnea even at rest;
- palpitations, cardiac arrhythmias.
If severe OHSS develops, emergency hospitalization in a specialized inpatient unit is required for treatment.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. Indirect method for assessing IAH severity.
Type: assessment tool
Purpose: assessment of IAH grade
Content: When studying various methods for indirect measurement of IAP, the maximum correlation was found between bladder pressure and inferior vena cava pressure. Bladder pressure measurement is a simple, inexpensive, and fairly accurate method proposed as the "gold standard" for measuring IAP.
Measurement of IAP is performed in the supine position. Urinary bladder catheterization is performed using a Foley catheter connected to a measuring hollow tube. Then, 20-25 ml of warm sterile isotonic sodium chloride solution** is injected into the bladder within 10-15 seconds using a syringe. After the tube is filled with the solution, the measuring tube is moved to a vertical position. The upper edge of the pubic symphysis is taken as the zero point of the scale. The IAP level corresponds to the height of the water column in the tube during the patient's exhalation.
Interpretation: The exact level of IAP (grade of IAH) is still a matter of debate. Previously, a value of 15-18 mm Hg (103) dominated the literature. Some studies described a threshold of 8 mm Hg (104). Currently, according to the recommendations of the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (Eng. – WSACS), the threshold value for IAP is 12 mm Hg (103). The WSACS classification of IAH is presented in Table 4.
Table 4
WSACS Classification of IAH Severity
IAH Grade | IAP Level |
Grade I | 12-15 mm Hg |
Grade II | 16-20 mm Hg |
Grade III | 21-25 mm Hg |
Grade IV | >25 mm Hg |
It is inappropriate to rely solely on the IAP value as the single parameter characterizing IAH. An increase in IAP above normal values, even without any clinical manifestations, will eventually lead to organ and systemic dysfunction. In this regard, the rate of IAP increase is of great importance.
Appendix G2. Technique for performing paracentesis and thoracentesis
Type: procedure technique
Purpose: evacuation of ascitic and pleural fluid
Content: A decrease in IAP after removal of ascitic fluid by paracentesis or transvaginal puncture (TVP) leads to increased renal venous blood flow, restoration of diuresis, increased venous return and cardiac output, increased uterine perfusion, reduction of pulmonary symptoms, relief of severe respiratory failure, and a decrease in hematocrit and leukocytosis (21,105).
Indications for paracentesis:
- progressive tense ascites,
- dyspnea and respiratory failure against the background of ascites, as well as elevated IAP,
- oliguria despite adequate fluid resuscitation.
Paracentesis technique:
The patient is placed on the operating table with the head of the bed elevated. An ultrasound of the abdominal cavity is performed using a transabdominal ultrasound transducer to assess the amount of ascitic fluid, its distribution in the abdominal cavity, and to select the safest puncture site on the anterior abdominal wall. The patient's position on the table can be adjusted to ensure the safest puncture site. Under aseptic conditions, after preparing the operative field with antiseptics and disinfectants, local step-by-step infiltration anesthesia is performed, a skin incision is made with a scalpel, and the anterior abdominal wall is punctured with a small-diameter trocar, through the sleeve of which a catheter is inserted. The latter is secured to the skin of the anterior abdominal wall with a U-shaped suture around the catheter, after which an aseptic dressing is applied to the operative field. During the procedure, no more than 3 liters of ascitic fluid should be evacuated at one time, which is then sent for microbiological and biochemical analysis.
In severe OHSS, especially during pregnancy, prolonged fractional removal of ascitic fluid is advisable. For this purpose, a urological device for urinary bladder drainage with a pre-installed J-catheter is used, which is left in place for 7-20 days. The total volume of ascitic fluid evacuated during the treatment of severe OHSS can range from 30,000 to 90,000 ml. This approach has several advantages as it avoids the simultaneous evacuation of a large volume of fluid and thereby eliminates rapid fluctuations in IAP that cause hemodynamic disturbances.
TVP technique:
TVP is performed in specialized inpatient units of ART clinics under ultrasound guidance by a specialist physician skilled in this procedure, due to the high risk of ovarian injury and intra-abdominal bleeding. The vaginal wall is punctured through the lateral fornix using a special puncture needle attached via an adapter to the vaginal probe of the ultrasound machine. A similar principle for ovarian TVP allows the aspiration of ascitic fluid from the pelvic cavity using a vacuum pump and reducing IAP. The volume of aspirated fluid is determined individually, depending on the patient's condition, and as a rule, does not exceed 3000 ml due to the risk of orthostatic collapse.
Possible complications:
- Pelvic organ injury.
- Intra-abdominal hemorrhage.
- Ovarian apoplexy, torsion.
- Hemodynamic alterations.
- Purulent-inflammatory complications.
Measures for complication prevention:
- Insertion of the trocar into the abdominal cavity under ultrasound guidance.
- Removal of no more than 3000 ml of fluid at a time.
- Careful care of the drainage catheter*** (daily change of the dressing and sterile medical gauze pad, treatment of the catheter exit site with antiseptics and disinfectants).
Indications for thoracentesis:
respiratory failure persisting after the removal of ascitic fluid from the abdominal cavity with a hematocrit level of 40%.
Thoracentesis technique:
Thoracentesis is performed with the female patient in a sitting position, leaning slightly forward and resting on her arms so that fluid from the posterodiaphragmatic region shifts to the lower parts of the pleural cavity. Under local anesthesia, the chest wall is punctured in the 7th–8th intercostal space along the posterior axillary or scapular lines. The puncture needle should be inserted strictly at the predetermined space, along the upper margin of the lower rib, as insertion beneath the lower margin carries the risk of injury to the intercostal nerve and artery. The puncture must be performed under ultrasound guidance.
Possible complications:
Nerve injury – neuritis.
Arterial injury – hemorrhage.
Lung injury – pneumothorax.
Hemodynamic changes.
Development of pulmonary edema associated with the evacuation of exudate (transudate, blood, air) from the pleural cavity.
Measures for complication prevention:
Insertion of the needle into the pleural cavity under ultrasound guidance.
Gradual removal of pleural effusion using an indwelling drainage catheter.
Since the possibility of complications (pneumothorax) cannot be completely excluded during thoracentesis, it is advisable to puncture one pleural cavity first, and on the following day, the other, after a thorough assessment of the degree of respiratory failure.