List of Abbreviations
GADA – Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Autoantibodies
IAA – Insulin Autoantibodies
IA-2 – Insulinoma-Associated-2 Autoantibodies (autoantibodies to tyrosine phosphatase)
ICA – Islet Cell Cytoplasmic Autoantibodies
HbA1c – Hemoglobin A1c (glycated hemoglobin)
HLA – Human Leukocyte Antigens
ZnT8A – Zinc Transporter 8 (autoantibodies to zinc transporter 8)
AH – arterial hypertension
BP – blood pressure
ACE – angiotensin-converting enzyme
Abs – antibodies
ATC – Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification
HRV – heart rate variability
BG – blood glucose
ONH – optic nerve head
DKA – diabetic ketoacidosis
DME – diabetic macular edema
DNA – deoxyribonucleic acid
DN – diabetic nephropathy
DPPN – diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy
DR – diabetic retinopathy
BMI – body mass index
LAI – long-acting insulin (long-acting insulins and their injectable analogs)
RAI – rapid-acting insulin (short-acting insulins and their injectable analogs)
UAI – ultra-rapid-acting insulin (short-acting insulins and their injectable analogs)
Uulai – ultra-long-acting insulin (long-acting insulins and their injectable analogs)
Urai – ultra-short-acting insulin (short-acting insulins and their injectable analogs)
CAN – cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy
HDL – high-density lipoproteins
LDL – low-density lipoproteins
MDI – multiple daily injections of insulin (and its analogs)
ICD-10 – International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision
INN – International Nonproprietary Name
CGM – continuous glucose monitoring
CSII – continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (of insulin and its analogs)
NPH – Neutral Protamine Hagedorn
ND – neonatal diabetes mellitus
OGTT – oral glucose tolerance test
eGFR – estimated glomerular filtration rate
DM – diabetes mellitus
T1D – type 1 diabetes mellitus
T2D – type 2 diabetes mellitus
GFR – glomerular filtration rate
LCE – level of confidence of evidence
GRS – grade of recommendation strength
FGM – flash glucose monitoring
HR – heart rate
CKD – chronic kidney disease
XE – bread unit
ECG – electrocardiography
** – the medicinal product is included in the list of vital and essential drugs for medical use
Terms and Definitions
C-peptide – a 31-amino acid polypeptide formed during the cleavage of proinsulin by peptidases.
Autoimmunity – the appearance of antibodies in the body against its own structures and tissues
Biguanides – a class of hypoglycemic medications
Insulin analogs – a form of insulin in which certain modifications have been made to the human insulin molecule. An analog acts similarly to insulin, but with pharmacokinetic / pharmacodynamic differences that can provide advantages
Hyperglycemia – blood glucose level above the normal range
Hypoglycemia – blood glucose levels below normal values
Glycemia – blood glucose concentration
Glycated hemoglobin – an indicator reflecting the average blood glucose level over the past 2–3 months
Dyslipidemia – an abnormality in the physiological ratio of blood lipids manifested as elevated triglycerides and low-density lipoproteins, and decreased high-density lipoproteins
Insulin – a hormone secreted under physiological conditions by the pancreatic beta cells, regulating blood glucose levels by stimulating glucose uptake by tissues
Insulin resistance – impairment of the biological action of insulin and the response of insulin-sensitive tissues to insulin at the pre- and post-receptor levels, leading to chronic metabolic changes and accompanied initially by compensatory hyperinsulinemia.
Immunological markers of autoimmune insulitis: IAA – insulin autoantibodies, ICA – islet cell cytoplasmic autoantibodies, GADA – glutamic acid decarboxylase autoantibodies, IA2 – tyrosine phosphatase autoantibodies, ZnT8 – zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies.
Lipodystrophy – pathological alteration of adipose tissue at insulin injection sites
Metabolic syndrome – a combination of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) with insulin resistance along with two of the following features: abdominal obesity, arterial hypertension (AH), elevated plasma triglycerides and/or decreased high-density lipoproteins (HDL), microalbuminuria.
Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) – an elevated blood glucose level during an oral glucose tolerance test at 2 hours post-load up to 7.8 and higher (but below 11.1) mmol/L
Obesity – elevated body mass index (above 2 SDS)
Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) – assessment of glycemia levels following a load of a dextrose solution** per os – fasting and 2 hours post-load
Prandial insulin is short-acting insulin administered with meals.
Self-monitoring of blood glucose – independent determination of blood glucose by patients at home using a glucometer or continuous glucose monitoring system
Bread unit (BU) – a method for estimating the amount of carbohydrates in food. One bread unit is equivalent to 10–12 grams of carbohydrates.
Insulin pen – a device for insulin injection
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Diabetes mellitus (DM) — a complex metabolic disorder characterized by chronic hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. Impaired insulin secretion and/or reduced tissue response to insulin as part of complex hormonal processes lead to altered insulin effects on target tissues, which in turn causes disturbances in carbohydrate, lipid, and protein metabolism. The same patient may simultaneously exhibit impaired insulin secretion and impaired insulin action [1].
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) – a polygenic disease resulting from a mismatch between insulin secretion and the level of insulin resistance, i.e., relative insulin deficiency. Typically, the development of T2DM is associated with other components of the metabolic syndrome (dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension, polycystic ovary syndrome, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease).
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
The development of T2DM is the result of a combination of genetic factors, environmental factors, and individual metabolic characteristics. Similarly to adults, the increasing incidence of T2DM in children is associated with the rising prevalence of overweight and obesity [2,3].
Specific risk factors for the development of T2DM in childhood currently include: intrauterine growth restriction followed by rapid weight gain in infancy, a positive family history of T2DM in first-degree relatives, maternal gestational diabetes during the child's prenatal development or in other pregnancies, and belonging to high-risk ethnic groups for T2DM.
The pathogenesis of T2DM is based on peripheral defects in insulin action and/or primary impairments in insulin secretion by b-cells. Pancreatic dysfunction at the onset of the disease is characterized by the loss of the first phase of insulin response to secretory stimuli. Elevated overall glycemia levels, in turn, increase the secretory workload on b-cells and cause hyperinsulinemia [4]. The gradual worsening of peripheral insulin resistance occurs simultaneously with primary changes in the pancreas. As a result, the workload on b-cells increases, leading to progressive hyperinsulinemia. This creates a "vicious circle" of changes followed by the exhaustion of b-cell function and the manifestation of diabetes. As the disease progresses, insulin secretion declines significantly, and absolute insulin deficiency may develop rapidly [1].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
The total number of patients under 18 years old with T2DM in the Russian Federation as of December 31, 2022, was 697 individuals (2.3 per 100,000 child population), with an incidence of 177 individuals (0.6 per 100,000 child population). The prevalence of T2DM in 2022 among children was 1.18 per 100,000 child population, and among adolescents, 8.7 per 100,000 adolescent population. The incidence of T2DM in children in 2022 was 0.33 per 100,000 child population, and among adolescents, 2.07 per 100,000 adolescent population [5–10].
According to epidemiological studies, the incidence of T2DM in children and adolescents varies significantly. In the United States, among adolescents aged 12–19 years, the highest prevalence of T2DM was observed among American Indians (1.74 per 1,000), followed by African Americans (1.05 per 1,000), Asian/Pacific Islanders (0.54 per 1,000), Hispanics (0.48 per 1,000), and non-Hispanic whites (0.19 per 1,000). The increase in the incidence and prevalence of T2DM among youth in the U.S. and several other populations is evidently the result of a predominance of high-risk ethnic groups within them. Several studies in Europe show that T2DM in adolescents remains rare in European populations, accounting for only 1–2% of all diabetes cases [11].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
E11.2 - Type 2 diabetes mellitus: with renal complications;
E11.3 - Type 2 diabetes mellitus: with ophthalmic complications;
E11.4 - Type 2 diabetes mellitus: with neurological complications;
E11.5 - Type 2 diabetes mellitus: with peripheral circulatory complications;
E11.6 - Type 2 diabetes mellitus: with other specified complications;
E11.7 - Type 2 diabetes mellitus: with multiple complications;
E11.8 - Type 2 diabetes mellitus: with unspecified complications;
E11.9 - Type 2 diabetes mellitus: without complications.
R73.0 - Abnormal glucose tolerance test findings.
Example of diagnosis formulation: Type 2 diabetes mellitus with neurological complications (ICD-10 code: E11.4).
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
The classification of DM is presented in Table 1.
Table 1 – Etiological classification of diabetes mellitus (ISPAD, 2022 [12])
Type of diabetes mellitus | |
|---|---|
I. Type 1 diabetes mellitus | · immune-mediated (characterized by the presence of one or more autoimmune markers) · idiopathic |
II. Type 2 diabetes mellitus | Insulin resistance with relative insulin deficiency |
III. Other specific types | A. Most common monogenic forms; B. Genetic defects in insulin action; C. Diseases of the exocrine pancreas; D. Endocrinopathies; E. Drug- or chemical-induced disorders F. Infections G. Uncommon forms of immune-mediated diabetes
|
IV. Gestational diabetes mellitus | Occurs during pregnancy |
a Except for overt diabetes mellitus.
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
Clinical features of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adolescence [13]:
In most cases, type 2 diabetes mellitus develops in adolescents who are overweight or have varying degrees of obesity, up to morbid obesity. Severe obesity is frequently accompanied by sleep apnea.
The age at diagnosis is mostly in the middle of puberty (mean age 13–14 years) — Tanner stage 3 and above.
Girls are affected more often than boys, with a ratio of 1.2–1.7:1, depending on ethnicity.
A positive family history of type 2 diabetes: 50–75% of patients have a parent with type 2 diabetes, and up to 90% have 1 to several first- or second-degree relatives with type 2 diabetes [4, 14].
Ethnicity plays an important role in susceptibility to type 2 diabetes.
A common and dominant feature is insulin resistance. Type 2 diabetes in adolescents is associated with other symptoms of "metabolic syndrome": abdominal obesity, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, microalbuminuria, acanthosis nigricans, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.
The range of clinical manifestations of type 2 diabetes under the age of 18 is quite broad — from moderate asymptomatic hyperglycemia to severe ketoacidosis (extremely rare). In many patients, type 2 diabetes is diagnosed during routine laboratory screening, or during evaluation for obesity or a positive family history [14]. Up to 20% of adolescents with type 2 diabetes present with polyuria, polydipsia, and weight loss. Up to 25% of girls with type 2 diabetes present with a vaginal infection as their primary complaint.
Some adolescents with type 2 diabetes develop ketosis or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at onset or during the course of the disease, the mechanism of which is not fully understood. It is hypothesized that insulin resistance combined with the adverse effects of chronic hyperglycemia on insulin secretion and action ("glucotoxicity") leads to relative insulin deficiency. When the deficiency becomes severe (due to prolonged hyperglycemia or an intercurrent illness), it enhances lipolytic processes, resulting in elevated free fatty acid levels, ketonemia, and ketonuria [4]. DKA is most commonly observed in African American and Hispanic patients. Studies have shown that baseline insulin sensitivity in these groups is lower than in their Caucasian peers, which may increase their susceptibility to developing relative insulin deficiency.
Hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state in type 2 diabetes has been described mainly in African American patients with severe comorbid conditions. Precipitating factors include infectious diseases, medications, non-compliance, undiagnosed diabetes, substance abuse, and other chronic conditions. As in adults, this condition in adolescents is associated with high mortality. Causes of death included hypovolemic shock, multiorgan failure, massive pulmonary embolism, etc. In rare cases, complications such as pancreatic necrosis, extensive small bowel necrosis, and superior mesenteric artery thrombosis have been described in adolescents.
The course of type 2 diabetes is usually undulating. Periods of deterioration alternate with periods of stabilization and improvement. Seasonal changes, emotional stress, weight changes, and other factors influence the course of the disease.
Adolescents with type 2 diabetes are at a high risk of developing specific micro- and macrovascular complications, which significantly exceeds that of type 1 diabetes, as well as type 2 diabetes diagnosed at an older age.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition:
1) Blood glucose and/or glycated hemoglobin levels meeting the criteria for diabetes mellitus (Table 2) combined with the clinical presentation;
2) Absence of type 1 diabetes-associated autoantibodies and molecular genetic data indicating a monogenic form of diabetes;
3) Obesity or overweight, clinical and/or laboratory signs of insulin resistance — elevated fasting insulin and/or C-peptide levels and/or during an OGTT, positive insulin resistance indices, and other components of "metabolic syndrome" (dyslipidemia, arterial hypertension (AH), ovarian hyperandrogenism, etc.), with a positive family history of type 2 diabetes in first-degree relatives.
Table 2 – Diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus (ISPAD, 2018 [15])
I. Classical symptoms of diabetes mellitus or a hyperglycemic ketoacidotic state in combination with a venous plasma glucose concentration of ≥11.1 mmol/L (random determination) |
|---|
or II. Fasting venous plasma glucose level of ≥7.0 mmol/L. (The fasting state is defined as no caloric intake for at least 8 hours.)a |
or III. Venous plasma glucose level 2 hours after a load ≥11.1* mmol/L during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)a |
or IV. HbA1c ≥ 6,5% b. |
a In the absence of overt hyperglycemia, a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus made on the basis of these criteria must be confirmed by repeat tests.
b A level of less than 6.5% does not exclude the possibility of diagnosing diabetes mellitus based on glucose levels. The role of HbA1c itself in the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children remains incompletely understood.
In accordance with the World Health Organization guidelines, adopted by the Russian Association of Endocrinologists, the normal fasting venous plasma glucose level is <6.1 mmol/L, and 2 hours after a load during an OGTT is <7.8 mmol/L. The intermediate stages in the progression of carbohydrate metabolism disorders from normal glucose homeostasis to clinical type 1 diabetes are impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG). These conditions are not independent nosological entities, but are regarded as "prediabetes" [15, 16], reflecting a high risk of developing diabetes.
IGT and IFG are not interchangeable concepts, as they represent different levels of impaired glucose regulation: basal metabolism and the dynamic response to a standardized glucose load.
Diagnostic criteria for IGT and IFG [17]:
IFG is defined as a fasting venous plasma glucose level of ≥6.1 and <7.0 mmol/L;
IGT is defined as a venous plasma glucose level 2 hours after a load of ≥7.8 and <11.1 mmol/L during an OGTT.
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
The onset of type 2 diabetes in children occurs in the second decade of life, coinciding with puberty. The disease extremely rarely manifests in the prepubertal period. The clinical presentation of type 2 diabetes onset in children varies from asymptomatic hyperglycemia to pronounced clinical symptoms of diabetes.
Most adolescents at the onset of type 2 diabetes present with complaints of thirst, polyuria, fatigue, asthenia, and in some cases, weight loss, recurrent vulvitis, and balanitis. When ketosis develops, there is acetone breath, dry skin and mucous membranes, vomiting, and altered consciousness up to a comatose state in DKA. In some children, manifestations of hyperglycemia and dehydration are absent at the onset of type 2 diabetes, and the disease may be diagnosed incidentally during routine health check-ups or evaluation for obesity or other conditions [14].
The development of the disease in most children occurs against the background of overweight and obesity. Patients complain of elevated blood pressure, skin darkening in natural folds, sleep disturbances, snoring, daytime sleepiness; girls may experience menstrual irregularities and hirsutism [18].
2.2 Physical Examination
Physical examination includes inspecting the skin for darkening in natural folds (acanthosis nigricans) and signs of hirsutism (in girls), measuring weight and height with calculation of body mass index and BMI SDS, assessing the presence of subcutaneous adipose tissue redistribution in an abdominal pattern, and measuring peripheral blood pressure [14].
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
Blood glucose testing in a laboratory setting is recommended for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in patients with clinical manifestations of diabetes and/or hyperglycemia [15, 17].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments:
o Blood glucose testing using glucometers is not recommended for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, as glucometers lack sufficient accuracy for a definitive diagnosis and may lead to diagnostic errors;
o In the absence of symptoms, the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes cannot be based solely on a single blood glucose measurement. If the diagnosis is in doubt, prolonged monitoring with fasting and/or postprandial blood glucose testing and/or an OGTT may be required;
o Hyperglycemia identified under stress conditions, during acute infection, trauma, surgery, respiratory dysfunction, circulatory problems, etc., may be transient and require treatment, but does not in itself indicate the presence of diabetes.
In the absence of clinical symptoms of diabetes in patients with hyperglycemia, repeat laboratory blood glucose testing and/or an OGTT is recommended for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes [15, 17].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: An OGTT should not be performed if diabetes can be diagnosed using fasting, postprandial, or random blood glucose levels.
Rules for conducting an OGTT:
OGTT should be performed in the morning after at least 3 days of unrestricted diet and normal physical activity. The test must be preceded by an 8–10 hour overnight fast (water is permitted). The last evening meal should contain 30–50 g of carbohydrates. After fasting blood sampling, the subject should drink a #dextrose** solution within no more than 5 minutes, calculated as 1.75 g of anhydrous #dextrose** (1.925 g of #dextrose** monohydrate) per kg of body weight, but not exceeding 75 g (82.5 g), dissolved in 250–300 ml of water [12]. Smoking is prohibited during the test. A repeat blood sample is taken after 2 hours.
To prevent glycolysis and erroneous results, glucose concentration must be determined immediately after blood collection, or the blood must be centrifuged immediately after collection, stored at 0–4°C, or collected in a vacuum tube containing sodium fluoride and EDTA.
An OGTT is not performed:
against the background of an acute illness;
against the background of short-term intake of medications that increase glycemia levels.
It is recommended to test blood glycated hemoglobin levels in a laboratory setting for children with clinical manifestations of DM and/or hyperglycemia to diagnose type 2 diabetes mellitus [15].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments:
o The glycated hemoglobin assay must be performed using methods (equipment and kits) certified by the NGSP and standardized against the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT);
o A significant discrepancy between glycated hemoglobin values and blood glucose levels may be due to the presence of various hemoglobin variants (hemoglobinopathy) in the patient, which affects the results obtained by certain methods; in such cases, an alternative method for determining glycated hemoglobin should be used.
o Under conditions affecting erythrocyte lifespan (iron deficiency anemia, sickle cell anemia, pregnancy, hemodialysis, recent blood loss or transfusion, or erythropoietin therapy, etc.), only blood plasma glucose determination should be used to diagnose type 2 diabetes mellitus.
It is recommended to detect ketone bodies in urine or blood in children with clinical manifestations of DM and/or hyperglycemia to diagnose the severity of carbohydrate metabolism disorders [15].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: If there is a significant elevation of ketones in blood or urine, treatment must be initiated immediately, and the child should be referred to a diabetes specialist on the same day due to the high risk of DKA development.
2.3.1 Laboratory diagnostic tests performed for differential diagnosis
It is recommended to determine the blood levels of antibodies to pancreatic islet cell antigens (GADA; IA-2; ZnT8 zinc transporter autoantibodies) in children with suspected type 2 diabetes mellitus to rule out type 1 diabetes mellitus [19,20].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: The presence of one or more diabetes-associated autoantibodies (autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase – GADA; autoantibodies to tyrosine phosphatase – IA-2; autoantibodies to zinc transporter 8 – ZnT8) confirms the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus.
If islet autoantibody titers are negative, given the heterogeneity and overlap of clinical features of various types of DM in children, it is advisable to consider molecular genetic testing in the following cases:
Family history of DM with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern;
Moderate fasting hyperglycemia (5.5–8.5 mmol/L), especially at a younger age, without obesity;
Prolonged "honeymoon phase" (more than 1 year) or unusually low insulin requirement (less than 0.5 IU/kg/day) with a DM duration of more than one year;
Associated conditions such as deafness, optic atrophy, or syndromic forms (mitochondrial diseases, lipoatrophic diabetes, Rabson-Mendenhall syndrome, Alström syndrome).
It is recommended to test fasting and stimulated blood C-peptide and/or plasma insulin levels in children with suspected type 2 diabetes mellitus to detect insulin resistance/assess endogenous insulin secretion [21].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: elevated C-peptide/insulin levels are not characteristic of type 1 diabetes mellitus 12–14 months after disease onset; detectable C-peptide levels are not characteristic of type 1 diabetes mellitus 5 years after disease onset
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
No specific instrumental diagnostic tests are provided for diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Instrumental diagnostic tests for diagnosing complications and comorbidities of type 2 diabetes mellitus are presented in the relevant section.
2.5 Other Procedures
Not applicable.
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
The treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children consists of the following main components:
glucose-lowering therapy;
self-management education and home monitoring;
nutrition;
physical activity;
psychological support.
3.1 Assessment and glycemic control targets
It is recommended to test blood glycated hemoglobin levels every three months in all children with type 2 diabetes mellitus to assess glycemic control and treatment efficacy [21,22].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to achieve and maintain glycated hemoglobin levels at <7.0% in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus to reduce the risk of developing and progressing chronic DM complications [22–24].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments:
The necessary conditions for achieving the target level of glycemic control are:
o Regular HbA1c monitoring (4 times a year).
o Regular self-monitoring of blood glucose. The frequency of monitoring is individual, based on the degree of disease compensation and the type of glucose-lowering therapy used (ranging from fasting and postprandial glucose measurements several times a week in well-compensated cases, up to 6–10 times a day on an intensified insulin therapy regimen).
o Regular evaluation and adjustment of treatment.
o Due to the lack of systematic data in the "children and adolescents" age category, data have been extrapolated from the "adults and young adults" age category
3.2 Pharmacotherapy
Therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus in children involves metformin** preparations and insulin and insulin analog preparations, either as monotherapy or in combination, depending on the severity of DM symptoms, the degree of hyperglycemia, and the presence or absence of ketosis/ketoacidosis. The use of liraglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus in adolescents has demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical trials. The goal of pharmacotherapy is to achieve and maintain optimal glycemic control, prevent acute and chronic complications, improve insulin sensitivity, and enhance endogenous insulin secretion [4,25].
It is recommended to use metformin** in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged >10 years to achieve target glycemic control goals [26].
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: When diagnosing type 2 diabetes mellitus, metformin** may be prescribed as monotherapy if glycated hemoglobin is <8.5% and there is no ketosis, or in combination with insulin therapy if glycated hemoglobin is ≥8.5% or ketosis/DKA is present (prescribed after ketosis resolution). In the second case, transition to metformin** monotherapy after type 2 DM manifestation is usually possible within 2–6 weeks. When adding metformin** preparations, the dose of insulin and its analogs is reduced by 30–50% with each increase in the metformin** dose (Appendix B).
The starting dose of metformin** is 500 mg per day. The dose is titrated once a week. The maximum daily dose is 1000 mg twice a day or 850 mg three times a day.
o The risk of hypoglycemia with metformin** monotherapy is extremely low.
o Gastrointestinal side effects (abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea) may occur with metformin** use, but in most cases can be minimized by slow dose titration (over 3–4 weeks) and taking it with meals.
o The risk of lactic acidosis associated with metformin** use is extremely low. However, metformin** should not be prescribed to patients with ketoacidosis, renal, cardiovascular, or pulmonary failure. Metformin** therapy should be temporarily discontinued if radiocontrast agents are required, or in the event of gastrointestinal diseases.
It is recommended to use long-acting insulins and their injectable analogs (Table 3) in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus to achieve target glycemic control [21,27].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: long-acting insulins (and their injectable analogs)
are prescribed: 1) upon diagnosis of type 2 DM with a glycated hemoglobin level of ≥8.5% and/or ketosis/DKA as monotherapy or in combination with metformin** in children over 10 years of age (after DKA resolution), or 2) when HbA1c is above the target level during 3–4 months of metformin** monotherapy (Appendix B).
Long-acting insulins (and their injectable analogs) and their administration regimens are selected individually for each patient based on the drug action profile and individual tolerance. The initial dose of long-acting insulin (and its injectable analogs) is 0.25–0.5 IU/kg/day. Dose titration is performed based on glycemia indicators until target glycemic control goals are reached.
Table 3 – Types and action profiles of insulin preparations
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification | Type of insulin | International Nonproprietary Name (INN) | Onset of action (h) | Peak action (h) | Duration of action (h) | Age restrictions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rapid-acting insulins and their analogues for injection | Ultra-rapid-acting (human insulin analogues), URAI | Insulin aspart** (containing excipients: nicotinamidea and argininea) [28,29] | 5-10 minutes | 1-3 | 3-5 | Over 1 year of age |
Rapid-acting (human insulin analogues), RAIA | Insulin aspart** [30,31] | 10–20 minutes | 1-3 | 3-5 | Over 1 year of age | |
Insulin glulisine** [32,33] | Over 6 years of age | |||||
Insulin lispro** 100 IU/mL [33–36] | No | |||||
Short-acting, SAI | Soluble human recombinant insulin** [34,35] | 0,5-1 | 2–4 | 5–8 | No | |
Intermediate-acting insulins and their analogues for injection | Intermediate-acting (NPH insulins) | Human recombinant isophane insulin** [37–39] | 2-4 | 4-12 | 12-24 | No |
Long-acting insulins and their analogues for injection | Long-acting (human insulin analogues), LAI | Insulin glargine** 100 IU/mL [37,38] | 2-4 | 8-12 | 22-24 | Over 2 years of age |
Insulin detemir** [39–41] | 1-2 | 4-7 | 20-24 | |||
Ultra long-acting (human insulin analogues), ULAIA | Insulin glargine** 300 IU/mL [42] | 2-6 | Not pronounced | 30-36 | Over 6 years of age | |
Insulin degludec** [31,40,43] | 0,5-1,5 | Not pronounced | More than 42 | Over 1 year of age | ||
Intermediate- or long-acting insulins and their analogues in combination with short-acting insulins for injection | Combination of ULAIA and RAIA (human insulin analogues) | insulin degludec + insulin aspart** [30] | The same as for insulin aspart and insulin degludec, i.e., in combination they act separately | Over 2 years of age | ||
Doses of insulin preparations and their analogues, as well as the administration regimen, are selected individually for each patient based on age, insulin action profile, individual tolerability, etc., using glycemic control data (glycemia indices and HbA1c levels).
Switching from one insulin preparation and its analogues to another occurs quite frequently. When switching a patient from one insulin to another, the following set of requirements must be followed to best ensure patient safety [44]:
1. In case of different INNs.
• Switching from one insulin preparation and its analogues to another must be carried out strictly according to medical indications, only under the supervision of a physician, and requires more frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose, patient education, and dose adjustment of the newly prescribed insulin and its analogues.
• The switch can be made from one insulin preparation and its analogues to another either within the same ATC classification group or with a change in the ATC group (e.g., switching from human insulin to an insulin analogue and vice versa).
2. In case of the same INN.
• Switching patients from one insulin and its analogues to another with proven interchangeability (i.e., proven bioequivalence regarding pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety profile) generally does not require more frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose, patient education, or dose adjustment of the newly prescribed insulin.
• Switching patients from one insulin and its analogues to another within the same INN but with different pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics must be carried out according to the rules specified for preparations with different INNs.
• In the event of adverse events occurring either during the initiation of insulin therapy or when switching from one insulin preparation and its analogues to another—which include worsening of glycemic control, a significant change in insulin requirement/dose, or the development of allergic reactions—reporting to the Federal Service for Surveillance in Healthcare is mandatory.
The decision to switch from one preparation of insulin and its analogues to another is made by the physician taking into account the current instructions for use.
It is recommended to use short-acting insulins and their analogues for injection in children with type 2 diabetes (Table 3) to achieve the target level of glycemic control [21,45] (Appendix B).
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the addition of short-acting insulins and their analogues for injection is recommended when the target glycated hemoglobin level cannot be achieved with a combination of metformin** and long-acting insulins and their analogues for injection (at a maximum daily dose of 1.5 IU/kg/day) in order to optimize glycemic control.
Short-acting insulin and the administration regimen are selected individually for each patient based on the insulin action profile and individual tolerability. Titration of doses of insulin and its analogues is carried out according to glycemia indices.
It is recommended to use liraglutide subcutaneously once daily in doses up to 1.8 mg/day in children aged >10 years with type 2 diabetes and carbohydrate metabolism decompensation during ongoing therapy, in order to achieve the target level of glycemic control [46] (Appendix B).
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: in case of ineffectiveness of metformin** monotherapy or a combination of metformin** with insulins and their analogues (glycated hemoglobin level above the target level), therapy with
the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue liraglutide may be prescribed in addition to the ongoing therapy.
It is recommended that children with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin therapy follow insulin injection technique rules to reduce the risk of lipodystrophy development [47,48].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5Level of Clinical Effectiveness C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that children with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin therapy undergo visual inspection of injection sites and have their injection skills evaluated to reduce the risk of lipodystrophy formation [47,48].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comment: Children with type 2 diabetes and their parents must learn to independently inspect injection sites and recognize lipodystrophies.
It is recommended that children with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin therapy rotate the injection site with each injection, use larger injection areas, and use needles only once to prevent lipodystrophy formation [47,48].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
3.3 Glucose self-monitoring
It is recommended that children with type 2 diabetes undergo regular self-monitoring of blood glucose using a blood glucose meter to achieve optimal glycemic control and reduce the risk of complications [21,22].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments:
Blood glucose monitoring is performed using blood glucose meters. Personal blood glucose meters are used at home. Currently, there are blood glucose meters with adjustable individual glycemic target ranges, as well as meters with wireless data transmission of glucose levels to medical specialists, relatives, or a special application installed on the patient's smartphone for use during remote monitoring.
Personal blood glucose meters must comply with GOST R ISO 15197-2015 regarding analytical and clinical accuracy. At blood plasma glucose levels <5.6 mmol/L, 95% of measurements must deviate from the reference analyzer by no more than ±0.8 mmol/L; at blood plasma glucose levels ≥5.6 mmol/L, 95% of measurements must deviate from the reference analyzer by no more than ±15%.
In healthcare facilities, in addition to laboratory analyzers, professional-use blood glucose meters (multi-user, hospital-grade) must be used, which possess higher measurement accuracy compared to personal blood glucose meters and withstand multiple disinfection cycles in accordance with well-validated methods provided by the manufacturer.
Recommendations for the frequency of glycemic self-monitoring in children with type 2 diabetes are individual and depend on the glucose-lowering therapy used and the level of carbohydrate metabolism compensation.
o Blood glucose measurement at least 3–4 times a week in children on metformin** monotherapy. When achieving the target glycated hemoglobin level during metformin** monotherapy, several blood glucose measurements throughout the week are usually sufficient: fasting and postprandial.
o In case of an elevated glycated hemoglobin level, during an intercurrent illness, or upon the onset of symptoms of hyper- and hypoglycemia, the frequency of self-monitoring should be increased.
o Patients on insulin therapy need to perform glycemic self-monitoring more frequently, up to 6–10 times a day.
3.4 Education
Education is a necessary element of successful diabetes treatment and control and should be accessible to all children with type 2 diabetes and their parents.
It is recommended to educate children with type 2 diabetes and their families on the principles of a healthy lifestyle, including changes in diet and physical activity at the time of diagnosis and regularly thereafter to improve carbohydrate and fat metabolism and normalize weight [49,50].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments:
o Education should be tailored to each individual according to their lifestyle, learning capacity, etc.
o Education should be continuous to maintain the level of knowledge and motivation.
o The patient's family must understand the high importance of lifestyle modification for the effective treatment of a patient with type 2 diabetes.
o Potential uncertainty in the type of diabetes at the onset of the disease often causes anxiety for the adolescent and their family. Already at the time of diabetes diagnosis, the physician should emphasize the importance of normalizing glycemia using glucose-lowering therapy appropriate to the degree of carbohydrate metabolism impairment (including insulin therapy), regardless of the "type" of diabetes.
o Education should include contraceptive counseling to prevent unplanned pregnancy in diabetes.
o Adolescents with type 2 diabetes need regular education on the hazards of smoking and the consequences of alcohol abuse for individuals with diabetes, such as the development of fatty liver disease and severe hypoglycemia.
3.5 Diet therapy
Diet therapy is an element of type 2 diabetes treatment and is recommended for all children.
It is recommended to implement a consistent dietary modification in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and overweight, featuring reduced intake of carbohydrates and saturated fats, and increased fiber intake to improve glycemic parameters and achieve weight loss [51,52].
GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Dietary recommendations should be based on healthy eating principles and be suitable for all children with T2D and their families to improve diabetes control outcomes and reduce cardiovascular risks. Nutritional advice should be tailored to cultural, ethnic, and family traditions, while also taking into account the cognitive and psychosocial aspects of the child and family.
Priority dietary modifications in T2D include:
o Elimination of sugary drinks and juices.
o Increased consumption of fruits and vegetables.
o Reduction in the intake of 'ready-to-eat' convenience foods.
o Reduction in the consumption of products containing refined sugar and corn syrup.
o Portion size control.
o Reduction of meals eaten outside the home.
o In families with Asian dietary traditions – increasing the consumption of animal protein and fresh vegetables while decreasing high-carbohydrate foods (noodles, white rice, starches).
o Replacing foods with easily digestible carbohydrates with those having a lower glycemic index (replacing white rice and white flour with brown rice and whole grain flour).
3.8 Physical activity
Recommendations regarding the need for regular physical activity are an essential part of T2D management.
In children with T2D, regular physical activity is recommended to improve glycemic control parameters, reduce excess weight, and enhance overall well-being [50,52–54].
GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: All adolescents with T2D are recommended to engage in regular physical activity lasting at least 60 minutes daily, which should include moderate-to-vigorous physical activity. The recommended level of physical activity is chosen individually. Screen time spent on computers, watching television, or playing video games should be reduced to a maximum of 2 hours per day [55,56]. Patients with proliferative retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy should be prescribed types of physical activity that do not lead to a significant increase in blood pressure [57].
3.9 Psychological support
It is recommended that children with T2D receive an appointment (testing, consultation) with a medical psychologist to diagnose psychological problems, facilitate disease adaptation, and achieve and maintain treatment goals [58,59].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that children with chronically decompensated T2D, along with their parents, receive an appointment (testing, consultation) with a medical psychologist for the diagnosis of psychological problems and the achievement and maintenance of treatment goals [58,59].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
3.10 Pain management
Not applicable.
3.11 Other treatment
Not applicable.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
Specific rehabilitation measures are not provided.
The list of rehabilitation measures for patients with T2D may include sessions with a medical psychologist, spa-resort treatment in specialized sanatoriums for children (including sanatoriums for children with parents) featuring medicinal mineral waters and a therapeutic climate, as well as social adaptation with the participation of specialists and social workers.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
It is recommended that children with T2D and overweight or obesity follow a diet with optimal caloric content, accounting for essential nutrients, aiming to normalize and maintain an ideal body weight [21,52].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: Prevention of overweight and obesity is one of the key strategies in the prevention of T2D.
It is recommended that children with T2D engage in adequate physical activity tailored to individual characteristics in order to normalize weight, improve glycemic parameters, and reduce the risk of late complications [21,52].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
It is recommended that patients undergo an appointment (examination, consultation) with a pediatric endocrinologist at least once every three months to assess health status, glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin), therapy, biochemical blood parameters, physical and sexual development, and menstrual cycle regularity [21].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Outpatient visits should include the periodic assessment and recording of the following:
General health and well-being:
o Complaints, with special attention to symptoms associated with complications and comorbid conditions. If such symptoms or signs are present, additional evaluation may be required;
o Intercurrent illnesses, diabetes-related emergencies, and hospitalizations. During the initial visit, conduct a thorough inquiry regarding the onset of the first symptoms of the disease, types and doses of administered insulins, reasons for and duration of hospitalizations (including cases of diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA] and severe hypoglycemia), timing and diagnostic methods for specific complications if present, concomitant endocrine and systemic diseases, and family history.
Glycemic control:
o Assessment of blood glycated hemoglobin levels over the past three months;
o Analysis of home blood glucose monitoring data (glucometer readings, continuous glucose monitoring [CGM], flash glucose monitoring [FGM]);
o Assessment of the frequency/severity of hypoglycemia, including determination of hypoglycemia awareness and the method used to treat hypoglycemia.
Metformin**:
o Doses of the drug;
o Adjustment of therapy based on glucose levels, diet, and physical activity;
Insulin therapy:
o Types and doses of the drug;
o Adjustment of insulin therapy taking into account glucose levels, diet, and physical activity;
o Injection technique.
General examination:
o Height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and sexual development;
o Skin condition (acanthosis nigricans) and insulin injection/administration sites (if applicable), infusion sets/CGM sensors (lipodystrophy, local reactions);
o Oral mucosa and teeth (caries, gingivitis);
o Abdominal examination (hepatomegaly), foot examination (calluses, ingrown toenails, and other lesions);
o Blood pressure adjusted for age, sex, and height percentiles.
6. Organization of Medical Care
Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization:
1) Form: elective; setting: inpatient, day hospital:
a. At the initial presentation for persistent hyperglycemia without clinical manifestations of T2D and/or ketosis;
b. Decompensation of glycemic control, high glycemic variability, frequent episodes of mild hypoglycemia;
c. Comprehensive screening for complications and comorbid conditions when outpatient evaluation is not feasible;
d. Transition to multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy.
2) Form: emergency, urgent; setting: inpatient:
a. At the initial presentation for hyperglycemia with clinical manifestations of T2D and/or ketosis;
b. Severe hypoglycemia;
c. DKA;
d. Acute development of specific complications.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:
1) Form: elective; setting: inpatient, day hospital:
a. Achievement of individual target glucose levels with a time-in-range (TIR) of at least 50% according to CGM or self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG);
2) Form: emergency, urgent; setting: inpatient:
a. Absence of clinically significant metabolic abnormalities (acid-base balance parameters, blood and/or urine ketones within normal limits), absence of acute neurological symptoms combined with the achievement of individual target glucose levels with a time-in-range (TIR) of at least 50% according to CGM or SMBG;
7. Additional Information
T2D in children and adolescents is typically accompanied by obesity and insulin resistance. Risk factors for T2D and insulin resistance include premature adrenarche [60], low birth weight for gestational age, maternal obesity during pregnancy [61], as well as obesity and a sedentary lifestyle in early childhood.
7.1 Complications and comorbid conditions of T2DM
Specific microvascular complications of diabetes in adolescence include diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic nephropathy (DN), and neuropathy.
Risk factors:
long disease duration, older age, and puberty;
smoking;
hypertension;
dyslipidemia;
family history burdened by the development of complications;
obesity;
sedentary lifestyle.
The pathogenesis of specific DM complications is complex: disorders of microcirculation, blood coagulation and fibrinolytic systems, antioxidant defense system, metabolism of vascular wall protein components, and vascular permeability. Chronic hyperglycemia activates non-enzymatic protein glycation, the polyol pathway of glucose metabolism, and direct glucose toxicity.
7.1.1 Diabetic nephropathy
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a specific renal complication of diabetes characterized by the development of nodular glomerulosclerosis, leading to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring renal replacement therapy (dialysis, transplantation). Contributing factors for progression include the duration of T2D, glycated hemoglobin levels above the individual target, and elevated diastolic blood pressure [62].
Classification.
The diagnosis of DN is established in accordance with the chronic kidney disease (CKD) classification based on the stage of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction and albuminuria level [63].
CKD stages in patients with diabetes
GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | Definition | Stage |
|---|---|---|
>90 | High and optimal | C1 |
60-89 | Mildly decreased | C2 |
45-59 | Mildly to moderately decreased | C3a |
30-44 | Moderately to severely decreased | C3b |
15-29 | Severely decreased | C4 |
<15 | End-stage renal disease | C5 |
*GFR – glomerular filtration rate
Schwartz formula (Bedside modification) [64,65] for calculating GFR in children:
GFR (mL/min/1.73 m²) = (36.2 × Height (cm)) / Plasma creatinine (µmol/L)
Methods with isotope-dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) calibration must be used to determine serum creatinine.
CKD classification by albuminuria category
Category | Urine ACR | AER (mg/24 hours) | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
mg/mmol | mg/g | |||
A1 | <3 | <30 | <30 | Normal to mildly increased |
A2 | 3-30 | 30-300 | 30-300 | Moderately increased |
A3 | >30 | >300 | >300 | Severely increased* |
Note: A/Cr – albumin/creatinine ratio, AER – albumin excretion rate, *including nephrotic syndrome (albumin excretion >2200 mg/24 hours [A/Cr >2200 mg/g; >220 mg/mmol])
Example of diagnosis formulation: Diabetic nephropathy, CKD G1A2.
When the GFR and urinary albumin levels are normal (stage C1A1), the diagnosis of CKD can be established only in the presence of other markers of renal injury [66,67].
It is recommended to annually determine urinary albumin and urinary creatinine levels with an assessment of the albumin/creatinine ratio in children with type 2 diabetes, starting from the time of diagnosis, in order to timely detect diabetic nephropathy [66,67].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments:
The presence of microalbuminuria is confirmed by the following: an albumin/creatinine ratio of 2.5 to 30 mmol/mg or 30 to 300 mg/g (single-void urine sample) in men, and 3.5 to 30 mmol/mg or 42 to 300 mg/g in women (due to decreased creatinine excretion).
A single-void urine sample for microalbuminuria is preferred due to known circadian fluctuations in albumin excretion and postural effects. Collecting 24-hour urine for microalbuminuria is difficult and has low informativeness.
Due to biological variability, two out of three positive morning urine samples for microalbuminuria must be used to confirm it. Persistent albuminuria (proteinuria) is defined by the presence of abnormalities in two or all three samples over a period of 3 to 6 months.
Factors that can cause false-positive results include the following: prior physical exercise, infections, elevated body temperature, menstrual bleeding, kidney disease, fever, and marked hyperglycemia. Abnormal (false-positive) test results must be rechecked, as microalbuminuria can be transient.
It is recommended to use angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (Table 4) in children with type 2 diabetes and persistent microalbuminuria to reduce the level and progression of albuminuria [21]. [68–72]
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments:
Table 4 – ACE Inhibitors
Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification | International Nonproprietary Name (INN) | Route of administration | Dose and duration of administration | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ACE inhibitors | #captopril** | Oral, 2-3 times a day. | 0.9 mg/kg/day | [68–73] |
It is recommended to test blood creatinine levels and estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in children with type 2 diabetes in the presence of persistent albuminuria (proteinuria) to determine the severity of renal function impairment [74].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to arrange a consultation with a nephrologist for children with type 2 diabetes in the presence of persistent albuminuria (proteinuria) for differential diagnosis with non-diabetic renal diseases and treatment of chronic kidney disease [74].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
7.1.2 Diabetic retinopathy
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a specific late neuromicrovascular complication of diabetes, typically developing sequentially from changes associated with increased permeability and occlusion of retinal vessels to the appearance of neovascularization and fibroglial tissue.
Diabetic macular edema (DME) — retinal thickening associated with fluid accumulation in the intercellular space of the neuroepithelium due to a breakdown of the blood-retinal barriers and a mismatch between fluid transudation and the ability for its reabsorption. DME can develop at any stage of DR.
The classification of DR identifies three main stages of the disease:
1. Non-proliferative: microaneurysms, small intraretinal hemorrhages, soft («cotton-wool») exudates.
2. Pre-proliferative: presence of at least one of the 3 features:
o venous abnormalities in 2 or more quadrants
o moderate IRMA in at least one quadrant
o multiple retinal hemorrhages in 4 quadrants of the fundus.
3. Proliferative (rare in children): neovascularization (and/or fibrous proliferation) of the optic disc and/or retina, preretinal and/or vitreous hemorrhages (hemophthalmos), tractional (or traction-rhegmatogenous) retinal detachment, neovascular glaucoma.
It is recommended to schedule an annual ophthalmological examination (consultation) in children with type 2 diabetes starting from the time of diagnosis for the timely detection of DR [75,76].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Screening for DR is performed by determining retinal visual acuity (visometry), fundus biomicroscopy, dilated ophthalmoscopy (examination of the peripheral fundus using a Goldmann three-mirror lens), and fundus biomicrophotography using a fundus camera [77].
It is recommended to screen for DR more frequently than once a year in children with type 2 diabetes at high risk of vision loss in order to prevent it [77]. [75,76].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Due to the potential worsening of DR in children with prolonged poor glycemic control upon its stable improvement, ophthalmological monitoring is recommended before starting intensive treatment and every three months for 6–12 months after its initiation, especially if DR was at a moderate non-proliferative stage or worse prior to therapy intensification, or if it progressed during treatment.
It is recommended in children with type 2 diabetes and severe non-proliferative or proliferative retinopathy, and/or diabetic macular edema, to perform panretinal laser photocoagulation of the retina and intravitreal administration of anti-angiogenic agents (doses correspond to the instructions for medical use of medicinal products of this pharmacological group regarding adult patients) to prevent or reduce the frequency and/or severity of vision loss [77–80].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: despite the lack of sufficient literature data confirming the efficacy and safety of panretinal laser photocoagulation of the retina and intravitreal administration of anti-angiogenic agents (anti-VEGF) in children with type 2 diabetes, these methods have proven efficacy in DR in adult patients with type 1 diabetes [77–80]. Therefore, there is no reason to assume that these data cannot be extended to children with type 2 diabetes.
7.1.3 Diabetic neuropathy
Diabetic neuropathy is a complex of clinical and subclinical syndromes, each characterized by diffuse or focal involvement of peripheral and/or autonomic nerve fibers resulting from type 2 diabetes. Diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DPN) is the most common generalized form, characterized by diffuse damage to all peripheral motor and sensory nerve fibers. Such damage appears asymptomatically, but then progresses initially to sensory loss and later leads to motor function loss distributed in a stocking-and-glove pattern. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) results from damage to the autonomic nervous system and can manifest as orthostatic hypotension, impaired adequate heart rate (HR) response, and Q-T interval prolongation. CAN is associated with the risk of sudden death and other cardiovascular risk factors [76,80–82].
It is recommended to have an annual consultation with a neurologist for children with type 2 diabetes starting from the time of diagnosis for the timely detection of diabetic neuropathy [21,81,83,84].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Specific tests for diagnosing DPN include the assessment of general and vibratory sensitivity, and reflexes. Specific tests for diagnosing CAN may include performing cardiovascular tests and/or assessing HRV in the frequency or time domain over short or long periods [84,85].
7.1.4. Dyslipidemia
It is recommended to test blood high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood triglycerides, total blood cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in children with type 2 diabetes at diagnosis and then once a year for the timely detection of dyslipidemia; if dyslipidemia is detected, the test is repeated every 6 months [85,86].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Elevated triglycerides and decreased HDL are characteristic of type 2 diabetes, obesity, and hyperinsulinism [87]. High LDL cholesterol is defined as values above 2.6 mmol/L, low HDL cholesterol as less than 0.91 mmol/L, and high triglycerides as more than 1.7 mmol/L. In these cases, children with type 2 diabetes are advised to improve metabolic control, make dietary changes (cholesterol-lowering diet), and increase physical activity.
If dyslipidemia persists after 6 months, as well as when fasting triglyceride levels rise above 5.6 mmol/L, it is recommended to consult a pediatric cardiologist [21,86,87].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Elevated triglyceride levels increase the risk of pancreatitis.
7.1.5. Arterial hypertension
Hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes is associated with endothelial dysfunction and an increased risk of cardiovascular and renal diseases. Its prevalence in young patients with type 2 diabetes ranges from 13.9% at 7 months after diabetes diagnosis to 33.8% at 3.9 years [87].
It is recommended to measure blood pressure on peripheral arteries in children with type 2 diabetes starting from the time of diagnosis and thereafter every 6 months for the timely detection of a sustained increase in BP [21]. [87].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: For a newly detected blood pressure elevation above the 95th percentile, weight loss, restriction of dietary sodium intake, and increased physical activity are recommended [21]. Maintaining BP within the target range in the UKPDS study in adult patients with type 2 diabetes showed a significant correlation with a reduced incidence of micro- and macrovascular complications to the same extent as the improvement in metabolic control.
It is recommended that children with type 2 diabetes and diagnosed stable arterial hypertension (with persistently elevated blood pressure > 95th percentile after 6 months) undergo an evaluation (examination, consultation) by a pediatric cardiologist for timely diagnosis, confirmation of the diagnosis, and prescription of antihypertensive therapy [66, 85].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
It is recommended to use ACE inhibitors in children with hypertension and type 2 diabetes to reduce blood pressure [66, 85, 88, 89].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: despite the lack of sufficient literature data confirming the efficacy and safety of this therapy in children with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension, it has proven efficacy in hypertension in children without diabetes [85] and in hypertension in young adult patients with type 2 diabetes [87]. Therefore, there is no reason to assume that these data cannot be extended to children with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The dosing regimen is determined in accordance with the instructions for medical use of a specific medicinal product of this pharmacological group.
It is recommended that children with type 2 diabetes undergo echocardiography and renal ultrasound at the onset of the disease and subsequently as clinically indicated to rule out cardiac and renal pathology of various origins [21, 86].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
7.1.6. Ovarian hyperandrogenism
The presence of hyperandrogenism in childhood is a risk factor for the development of polycystic ovary syndrome in adulthood
It is recommended to perform an examination to detect hirsutism and/or signs of hyperandrogenism, as well as to record data on the regularity of the menstrual cycle in female patients with type 2 diabetes starting from the onset of the disease and subsequently every 6 months [21].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to schedule an evaluation (examination, consultation) by an obstetriciangynecologist in cases of oligomenorrhea or amenorrhea, hirsutism, and other signs of hyperandrogenism for timely diagnosis, confirmation of the diagnosis, and prescription of therapy [21, 90].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
7.1.7. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)
Steatohepatitis is diagnosed in 25–50% of patients with type 2 diabetes; disease progression leads to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension [91, 92].
It is recommended to determine blood alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase activity, and perform a comprehensive abdominal ultrasound upon diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and subsequently every 6 months for the timely detection of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [93].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended that children with type 2 diabetes and an elevation of liver enzymes by more than 2.5 times and/or ultrasound changes in liver structure undergo an evaluation (examination, consultation) by a gastroenterologist for timely diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and prescription of therapy [94, 95].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
7.1.8. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS)
It is recommended to pay special attention to the following complaints: decreased quality of nighttime sleep, snoring, apnea, morning headaches, daytime sleepiness, nocturia, and enuresis in children with type 2 diabetes, starting from the time of diagnosis and subsequently every 6 months for the timely detection of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) [96, 97].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: If the aforementioned complaints are identified in children with type 2 diabetes, an evaluation (examination, consultation) by a neurologist (somnologist) is necessary for the timely diagnosis, confirmation of the diagnosis, and prescription of therapy for OSAS [21].
7.2. Diabetic ketoacidosis
Diabetic ketoacidosis in type 2 diabetes is very rare. Treatment is managed similarly to type 1 diabetes.
7.3 Hypoglycemia
Currently, the following classification of hypoglycemia is adopted [98]:
Level 1: plasma glucose levels from 3.0 to < 3.9 mmol/L (with or without symptoms) in patients with diabetes receiving glucose-lowering therapy indicate the risk of hypoglycemia and require the initiation of hypoglycemia-reversal measures regardless of the presence or absence of symptoms.
Level 2: plasma glucose values <3.0 mmol/L, with or without symptoms — clinically significant hypoglycemia requiring immediate correction.
Level 3: severe hypoglycemia — hypoglycemia within the above range with such cognitive impairment (including loss of consciousness, i.e., hypoglycemic coma) that requires the assistance of another person for correction.
It is recommended to initiate measures to treat hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes when blood plasma glucose is < 3.9 mmol/L to prevent the development of severe hypoglycemia [98].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: The main cause of hypoglycemia: excess insulin in the body relative to the intake of carbohydrates from outside (with food) or from endogenous sources (hepatic glucose production), as well as during accelerated carbohydrate utilization (muscle work).
Triggering factors:
- overdose of insulin and its analogues: patient error, malfunction of the insulin pen, insulin pump***, or glucometer, intentional overdose; physician error (excessively low target glycemic level, excessively high doses);
- alteration in the pharmacokinetics of insulin and its analogues: high titer of insulin antibodies, improper injection technique;
- increased sensitivity to insulin and its analogues: prolonged physical exertion, early postpartum period, adrenal or pituitary insufficiency;
- skipped meal or insufficient amount of bread units (XE), alcohol, dietary restriction for weight loss (without a corresponding reduction in insulin dose); delayed gastric emptying (in autonomic neuropathy), vomiting, malabsorption syndrome;
It is recommended to administer 10-15 grams or 0.3 grams/kg of fast-acting carbohydrates orally in the event of mild hypoglycemia (not requiring assistance from another person, blood glucose < 3.9 mmol/L) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus to prevent the development of severe hypoglycemia [98].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Treatment of hypoglycemia should raise blood glucose levels by approximately 3-4 mmol/L. Depending on the circumstances (nighttime hypoglycemia, physical exertion, etc.), fast-acting carbohydrates should be followed by additional slow-acting carbohydrates to prevent recurrent hypoglycemia. Blood glucose levels should be re-measured 10-15 minutes after carbohydrate intake to ensure the target glucose level has been achieved. If blood glucose does not rise sufficiently, repeat the intake of fast-acting carbohydrates followed by another blood glucose measurement in 10–15 minutes.
7.3.1 Severe hypoglycemia
Severe hypoglycemia is defined as an event characterized by severe cognitive impairment (including coma and seizures) requiring the assistance of another person for the active administration of carbohydrates, glucagon**, or other corrective actions. Hypoglycemic coma is a type of severe hypoglycemia that leads to loss of consciousness (coma) and seizures. Severe hypoglycemia requires prompt treatment.
It is recommended to administer dextrose** (10% solution, 2-3 ml/kg body weight intravenously) or glucagon** (1 mg for body weight ≥25 kg or 0.5 mg for body weight <25 kg intramuscularly or subcutaneously, or 3 mg of #glucagon intranasally [1]) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus for the treatment of severe hypoglycemia [98].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: Glucagon** should be available to all patients, parents, and caregivers of children with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin therapy, especially when there is a high risk of severe hypoglycemia. These individuals must be properly trained in the injection technique of the drug [99].
[1] The method of administration (route of administration) has undergone clinical trials, but this route of administration is not listed in the drug's package leaflet in the Russian Federation at the time of publication of the clinical guidelines
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria | Performance assessment (yes/no) |
|---|---|---|
1. | Blood glucose measurement performed | Yes/no |
2. | glycated hemoglobin testing performed | Yes/no |
3. | General biochemical blood test performed (total cholesterol, low-density lipoproteins, triglycerides) | Yes/no |
4. | Blood pressure measurement performed on peripheral arteries. | Yes/no |
5. | Urinary albumin determination and urinary creatinine level testing with albumin/creatinine ratio evaluation performed in patients | Yes/no |
6. | An ophthalmologist consultation (examination, counseling) was performed. | Yes/no |
References
Show references
Dedov I.I., Kuraeva T.L., Peterkova V.A. [Diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2013. 271 p.
Peterkova V.A., Kuraeva T.L., Eremina I.A. [Features of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents] // Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: From Theory to Practice. Edited by Academician of the RAS I.I. Dedov, Corresponding Member of the RAS M.V. Shestakova. Moscow: Medical Information Agency LLC, 2016.
Dubinina I.A. et al. Studying progression from glucose intolerance to type 2 diabetes in obese children // Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2014. Vol. 8, № 3. P. 133–137.
Kuraeva T.L. et al. [Problems of diagnosis and therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents] // Proceedings of the 5th City Scientific and Practical Conference "Endocrinological Aspects in Pediatrics". Moscow, 2011. P. 26–33.
Alexandrova G.A. et al. General morbidity of the child population of Russia (0–14 years) in 2019. Statistical materials. Part VI. Moscow: Department of Monitoring, Analysis and Strategic Development of Healthcare of the Russian Ministry of Health, FSBI «TsNIIOIZ» of the Russian Ministry of Health, 2020.
Alexandrova G.A. et al. Morbidity of the child population of Russia (0–14 years) in 2019 with a diagnosis first established in life. Statistical materials. Part V. Moscow: Department of Monitoring, Analysis and Strategic Development of Healthcare of the Russian Ministry of Health, FSBI «TsNIIOIZ» of the Russian Ministry of Health, 2020.
Alexandrova G.A. et al. Morbidity of the adolescent population of Russia (15–17 years) in 2019 with a diagnosis first established in life. Statistical materials. Part IX. Moscow: Department of Monitoring, Analysis and Strategic Development of Healthcare of the Russian Ministry of Health, FSBI «TsNIIOIZ» of the Russian Ministry of Health, 2020.
Alexandrova G.A. et al. General morbidity of the adolescent population of Russia (15–17 years) in 2019. Statistical materials. Part X. Moscow: Department of Monitoring, Analysis and Strategic Development of Healthcare of the Russian Ministry of Health, FSBI «TsNIIOIZ» of the Russian Ministry of Health, 2020.
Dedov I.I., Shestakova M.V., Vikulova O.K. Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus in the Russian Federation: clinical and statistical analysis according to the Federal Diabetes Register. 2017. Vol. 1, № 20. P. 13–41.
Dedov I.I. et al. Diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents according to the Federal Register of the Russian Federation: dynamics of main epidemiological characteristics for 2013–2016 // Diabetes Mellitus. 2017. Vol. 20, № 6. P. 392–402.
Dabelea D. et al. Prevalence of Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes Among Children and Adolescents From 2001 to 2009 // JAMA. 2014. Vol. 311, № 17. P. 1778.
Libman I. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022. Vol. 23, № 8. P. 1160–1174.
Dabelea D. et al. Etiological Approach to Characterization of Diabetes Type: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study // Diabetes Care. 2011. Vol. 34, № 7. P. 1628–1633.
Eremina I.A. et al. Clinical polymorphism of type 2 diabetes in children — the first study in Russia // Probl. Endocrinol. 2015. Vol. 61, № 6. P. 10–16.
Mayer-Davis E.J. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Definition, epidemiology, and classification of diabetes in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 7–19.
American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2021 // Diabetes Care. 2021. Vol. 44, № Supplement 1. P. S15–S33.
World Health Organization, International Diabetes Federation. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia: report of a WHO/IDF consultation. 2006.
Sabin M.A. Type 2 diabetes in children: Type 2 diabetes in children // Clin. Obes. 2013. Vol. 3, № 3–4. P. 112–116.
Klingensmith G.J. et al. The Presence of GAD and IA-2 Antibodies in Youth With a Type 2 Diabetes Phenotype: Results from the TODAY study // Diabetes Care. 2010. Vol. 33, № 9. P. 1970–1975.
Felton J.L. et al. Islet autoantibodies as precision diagnostic tools to characterize heterogeneity in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review // Commun. Med. 2024. Vol. 4, № 1. P. 66.
Zeitler P. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 28–46.
Petitti D.B. et al. Glycemic Control in Youth with Diabetes: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study // J. Pediatr. 2009. Vol. 155, № 5. P. 668-672.e3.
Zeitler P. et al. HbA 1c After a Short Period of Monotherapy With Metformin Identifies Durable Glycemic Control Among Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2015. Vol. 38, № 12. P. 2285–2292.
American Diabetes Association. 8. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018 // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № Supplement 1. P. S73–S85.
Eremina I.A., Kuraeva T.L. [Metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents] // Problems of Endocrinology. 2013. No. 1. P. 8–13.
Jones K.L. et al. Effect of Metformin in Pediatric Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A randomized controlled trial // Diabetes Care. 2002. Vol. 25, № 1. P. 89–94.
TODAY Study Group et al. A clinical trial to maintain glycemic control in youth with type 2 diabetes // N. Engl. J. Med. 2012. Vol. 366, № 24. P. 2247–2256.
Fath M. et al. Faster-acting insulin aspart provides faster onset and greater early exposure vs insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus: FATH et al . // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2017. Vol. 18, № 8. P. 903–910.
Bode B.W. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart Compared With Insulin Aspart, Both in Combination With Insulin Degludec, in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: The onset 7 Trial // Diabetes Care. 2019. Vol. 42, № 7. P. 1255–1262.
Battelino T. et al. Efficacy and safety of a fixed combination of insulin degludec/insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: A randomized trial // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19, № 7. P. 1263–1270.
Thalange N. et al. Insulin degludec in combination with bolus insulin aspart is safe and effective in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: IDeg effective and safe in pediatric T1D // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2015. Vol. 16, № 3. P. 164–176.
Danne T. et al. Pharmacokinetics, prandial glucose control, and safety of insulin glulisine in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2005. Vol. 28, № 9. P. 2100–2105.
Philotheou A. et al. Comparable Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glulisine and Insulin Lispro When Given as Part of a Basal–Bolus Insulin Regimen in a 26-Week Trial in Pediatric Patients with Type 1 Diabetes // Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2011. Vol. 13, № 3. P. 327–334.
Holcombe J.H. et al. Comparison of insulin lispro with regular human insulin for the treatment of type 1 diabetes in adolescents // Clin. Ther. 2002. Vol. 24, № 4. P. 629–638.
Tupola S. et al. Post-prandial insulin lispro vs. human regular insulin in prepubertal children with Type 1 diabetes mellitus // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2001. Vol. 18, № 8. P. 654–658.
Deeb L.C. et al. Insulin Lispro Lowers Postprandial Glucose in Prepubertal Children With Diabetes // PEDIATRICS. 2001. Vol. 108, № 5. P. 1175–1179.
Liu M. et al. A randomised, open-labelstudy of insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in Chinese paediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus // BMC Endocr. Disord. 2016. Vol. 16, № 1. P. 67.
Schober E. et al. Comparative trial between insulin glargine and NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus // J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. JPEM. 2002. Vol. 15, № 4. P. 369–376.
Robertson K.J. et al. Insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with Type 1 diabetes // Diabet. Med. J. Br. Diabet. Assoc. 2007. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 27–34.
Thalange N. et al. The rate of hyperglycemia and ketosis with insulin degludec‐based treatment compared with insulin detemir in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: An analysis of data from two randomized trials // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2019. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 314–320.
Danne T. et al. Insulin detemir is characterized by a consistent pharmacokinetic profile across age-groups in children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2003. Vol. 26, № 11. P. 3087–3092.
Danne T. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL (Gla-300) Versus Insulin Glargine 100 Units/mL (Gla-100) in Children and Adolescents (6-17 years) With Type 1 Diabetes: Results of the EDITION JUNIOR Randomized Controlled Trial // Diabetes Care. 2020. Vol. 43, № 7. P. 1512–1519.
Predieri B. et al. Switching From Glargine to Degludec: The Effect on Metabolic Control and Safety During 1-Year of Real Clinical Practice in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes // Front. Endocrinol. 2018. Vol. 9. P. 462.
Dedov I.I. et al. Draft guidelines of the Russian Association of Endocrinologists on the use of insulin biosimilars. 2021. Vol. 24, № 1. P. 76–79.
Arslanian S. et al. Evaluation and Management of Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № 12. P. 2648–2668.
Tamborlane W.V. et al. Liraglutide in Children and Adolescents with Type 2 Diabetes // N. Engl. J. Med. 2019. Vol. 381, № 7. P. 637–646.
Frid A.H. et al. New Insulin Delivery Recommendations // Mayo Clin. Proc. 2016. Vol. 91, № 9. P. 1231–1255.
Mayorov A.Yu. et al. Injection and infusion technique in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Methodological guide. Moscow: LLC «ARTINFO», 2018. 64 p.
Smart C.E. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Nutritional management in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 136–154.
American Diabetes Association. 4. Lifestyle Management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018 // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № Supplement 1. P. S38–S50.
Barlow S.E. Expert Committee Recommendations Regarding the Prevention, Assessment, and Treatment of Child and Adolescent Overweight and Obesity: Summary Report // Pediatrics. 2007. Vol. 120, № Supplement 4. P. S164–S192.
Lien A.S.-Y. et al. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Lifestyle Modification on Metabolic Control in Overweight Children // Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2017. Vol. 2017. P. 1–12.
Dhuper S., Buddhe S., Patel S. Managing Cardiovascular Risk in Overweight Children and Adolescents // Pediatr. Drugs. 2013. Vol. 15, № 3. P. 181–190.
Jensen M.D. et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and The Obesity Society // Circulation. 2014. Vol. 129, № 25 suppl 2. P. S102–S138.
Chahal H. et al. Availability and night-time use of electronic entertainment and communication devices are associated with short sleep duration and obesity among Canadian children: EECD use and obesity among children // Pediatr. Obes. 2013. Vol. 8, № 1. P. 42–51.
Lane A., Harrison M., Murphy N. Screen Time Increases Risk of Overweight and Obesity in Active and Inactive 9-Year-Old Irish Children: A Cross Sectional Analysis // J. Phys. Act. Health. 2014. Vol. 11, № 5. P. 985–991.
Adolfsson P. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Exercise in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 205–226.
Glazier R.H. et al. A Systematic Review of Interventions to Improve Diabetes Care in Socially Disadvantaged Populations // Diabetes Care. 2006. Vol. 29, № 7. P. 1675–1688.
Nadeau K.J. et al. Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes Consensus Report: Current Status, Challenges, and Priorities // Diabetes Care. 2016. Vol. 39, № 9. P. 1635–1642.
Ibáñez L. et al. Exaggerated Adrenarche and Hyperinsulinism in Adolescent Girls Born Small for Gestational Age // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999. Vol. 84, № 12. P. 4739–4741.
Dabelea D., Crume T. Maternal Environment and the Transgenerational Cycle of Obesity and Diabetes // Diabetes. 2011. Vol. 60, № 7. P. 1849–1855.
Yokoyama H. et al. Higher incidence of diabetic nephropathy in type 2 than in type 1 diabetes in early-onset diabetes in Japan // Kidney Int. 2000. Vol. 58, № 1. P. 302–311.
Stevens P.E., Levin A., Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Chronic Kidney Disease Guideline Development Work Group Members. Evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease: synopsis of the kidney disease: improving global outcomes 2012 clinical practice guideline // Ann. Intern. Med. 2013. Vol. 158, № 11. P. 825–830.
Schwartz G.J. et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD // J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN. 2009. Vol. 20, № 3. P. 629–637.
Schwartz G.J., Work D.F. Measurement and estimation of GFR in children and adolescents // Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. CJASN. 2009. Vol. 4, № 11. P. 1832–1843.
Copeland K.C. et al. Characteristics of Adolescents and Youth with Recent-Onset Type 2 Diabetes: The TODAY Cohort at Baseline // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011. Vol. 96, № 1. P. 159–167.
TODAY Study Group. Rapid Rise in Hypertension and Nephropathy in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes: The TODAY clinical trial // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 6. P. 1735–1741.
Lewis E.J. et al. The Effect of Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition on Diabetic Nephropathy // N. Engl. J. Med. 1993. Vol. 329, № 20. P. 1456–1462.
Strippoli G.F.M. et al. Effects of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor antagonists on mortality and renal outcomes in diabetic nephropathy: systematic review // BMJ. 2004. Vol. 329, № 7470. P. 828.
Lv J. et al. Antihypertensive agents for preventing diabetic kidney disease // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. / ed. Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Group. 2012.
Strippoli G.F. et al. Antihypertensive agents for preventing diabetic kidney disease // Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews / ed. The Cochrane Collaboration. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005. P. CD004136.pub2.
Wu H.-Y. et al. Comparative effectiveness of renin-angiotensin system blockers and other antihypertensive drugs in patients with diabetes: systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis // BMJ. 2013. Vol. 347, № oct24 2. P. f6008–f6008.
Barkai L, Soós A, Vámosi I. The effect of captopril therapy on the degree of microalbuminuria in diabetic children and adolescents with incipient nephropathy // Orv Hetil. 1996. Vol. 137, № 46. P. 2565–2568.
American Diabetes Association. 10. Microvascular Complications and Foot Care: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2018 // Diabetes Care. 2018. Vol. 41, № Supplement 1. P. S105–S118.
Wong J. et al. Timing Is Everything: Age of Onset Influences Long-Term Retinopathy Risk in Type 2 Diabetes, Independent of Traditional Risk Factors // Diabetes Care. 2008. Vol. 31, № 10. P. 1985–1990.
Constantino M.I. et al. Long-Term Complications and Mortality in Young-Onset Diabetes: Type 2 diabetes is more hazardous and lethal than type 1 diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 12. P. 3863–3869.
Donaghue K.C. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Microvascular and macrovascular complications in children and adolescents // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 262–274.
Martinez-Zapata M.J. et al. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for proliferative diabetic retinopathy // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. / ed. Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group. 2014.
Simunovic M.P., Maberley D.A.L. ANTI-VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR THERAPY FOR PROLIFERATIVE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis // Retina. 2015. Vol. 35, № 10. P. 1931–1942.
TODAY Study Group. Retinopathy in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes Participating in the TODAY Clinical Trial // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 6. P. 1772–1774.
Rodriguez B.L. et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors in U.S. children and adolescents with diabetes: the SEARCH for diabetes in youth study // Diabetes Care. 2006. Vol. 29, № 8. P. 1891–1896.
Eremina I.A. et al. [Cardiovascular form of autonomic neuropathy in adolescents with type 2 diabetes mellitus] // Problems of Endocrinology. 2014. Vol. 60, No. 5. P. 15–21.
Maffi P., Secchi A. The Burden of Diabetes: Emerging Data // Developments in Ophthalmology / ed. Bandello F. et al. S. Karger AG, 2017. Vol. 60. P. 1–5.
Jaiswal M. et al. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in adolescents and young adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Cohort Study // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018.
Copeland K.C. et al. Management of Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) in Children and Adolescents // PEDIATRICS. 2013. Vol. 131, № 2. P. 364–382.
EXPERT PANEL ON INTEGRATED GUIDELINES FOR CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH AND RISK REDUCTION IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS. Expert Panel on Integrated Guidelines for Cardiovascular Health and Risk Reduction in Children and Adolescents: Summary Report // PEDIATRICS. 2011. Vol. 128, № Supplement. P. S213–S256.
TODAY Study Group. Lipid and Inflammatory Cardiovascular Risk Worsens Over 3 Years in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes: The TODAY clinical trial // Diabetes Care. 2013. Vol. 36, № 6. P. 1758–1764.
Batisky D.L. What Is the Optimal First-Line Agent in Children Requiring Antihypertensive Medication? // Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2012. Vol. 14, № 6. P. 603–607.
Blowey D.L. Update on the Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertension in Pediatrics: Update on Pharmacologic Treatment in Pediatrics // J. Clin. Hypertens. 2012. Vol. 14, № 6. P. 383–387.
Legro R.S. et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013. Vol. 98, № 12. P. 4565–4592.
Newton K.P. et al. Prevalence of Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes in Children With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease // JAMA Pediatr. 2016. Vol. 170, № 10. P. e161971.
Nadeau K.J., Klingensmith G., Zeitler P. Type 2 Diabetes in Children is Frequently Associated with Elevated Alanine Aminotransferase: // J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2005. Vol. 41, № 1. P. 94–98.
Sundaram S.S., Zeitler P., Nadeau K. The metabolic syndrome and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: // Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 2009. Vol. 21, № 4. P. 529–535.
Reinehr T. et al. Lifestyle intervention in obese children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: 2-year follow-up study // Arch. Dis. Child. 2009. Vol. 94, № 6. P. 437–442.
Angulo P. et al. Independent predictors of liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis // Hepatology. 1999. Vol. 30, № 6. P. 1356–1362.
Shaw J.E. et al. Sleep-disordered breathing and type 2 diabetes // Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2008. Vol. 81, № 1. P. 2–12.
Foster G.D. et al. Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2009. Vol. 32, № 6. P. 1017–1019.
Abraham M.B. et al. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: Assessment and management of hypoglycemia in children and adolescents with diabetes // Pediatr. Diabetes. 2018. Vol. 19. P. 178–192.
Tinti D., Rabbone I. Mini-doses of glucagon to prevent hypoglycemia in children with type 1 diabetes refusing food: a case series // Acta Diabetol. 2019.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
LEADERS:
Valentina A. Peterkova – Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Scientific Supervisor of the Institute of Pediatric Endocrinology, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Institute of Higher and Continuing Professional Education, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance pediatric specialist endocrinologist of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Olga B. Bezlepkina – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Deputy Director of the Center – Director of the Institute of Pediatric Endocrinology, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor at the Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Institute of Higher and Continuing Professional Education, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
TEXT AUTHORS:
Laptev Dmitry Nikitich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the RAS, Head of the Pediatric Diabetes Department, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor at the Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Institute of Higher and Continuing Professional Education, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Eremina Irina Alexandrovna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Pediatric Diabetes Department, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Associate Professor at the Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Institute of Higher and Continuing Professional Education, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Sechko Elena Alexandrovna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Pediatric Diabetes Department, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
EXPERTS:
Alimova Irina Leonidovna – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Hospital Pediatrics with a Course in Neonatology, Faculty of Additional Professional Education, Smolensk State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the Smolensk Region.
Andrianova Ekaterina Andreevna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher at the Pediatric Diabetes Department, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Bashnina Elena Borisovna — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Endocrinology named after Academician V.G. Baranov, North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the North-Western Federal District.
Bolotova Nina Viktorovna — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Propaedeutics of Childhood Diseases, Pediatric Endocrinology, and Diabetology, Saratov State Medical University named after V.I. Razumovsky of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Galkina Galina Aleksandrovna — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Pediatric Endocrinology Department, Research Institute of Obstetrics and Pediatrics, Rostov State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the Rostov Region, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the Southern Federal District.
Emelyanov Andrey Olegovich – PhD in Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher, Pediatric Diabetes Department, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health; Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Institute of Higher and Continuing Professional Education, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Kiyaev Alexey Vasilievich — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Hospital Pediatrics, Ural State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the Center for Pediatric Endocrinology, Regional Children's Clinical Hospital, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the Sverdlovsk Region, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the Ural Federal District.
Kostrova Irina Borisovna — Head of the Pediatric Endocrinology Department, Children's Republican Clinical Hospital named after N.M. Kuraev, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the Republic of Dagestan, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the North Caucasian Federal District.
Kuraeva Tamar Leonidovna – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Chief Researcher, Pediatric Diabetes Department, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health; Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Institute of Higher and Continuing Professional Education, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Malievsky Oleg Arturovich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Hospital Pediatrics, Bashkir State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the Volga Federal District.
Petryaikina Elena Efimovna — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Director of the Russian Children's Clinical Hospital, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of Moscow, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the Central Federal District.
Samsonova Lyubov Nikolaevna — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Pediatric Endocrinology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Svetlova Galina Nikolaevna – PhD in Medical Sciences, Deputy Chief Medical Officer, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health; Pediatric Endocrinologist.
Taranushenko Tatyana Evgenievna — Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Postgraduate Education, Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after Professor V.F. Voyno-Yasenetsky of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the Siberian Federal District.
Titovich Elena Vitalievna – PhD in Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher, Pediatric Diabetes Department, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health; Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetology, Institute of Higher and Continuing Professional Education, National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Khramova Elena Borisovna – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Diseases, Faculty of Pediatrics, Tyumen State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health; Chief freelance pediatric endocrinologist of the Tyumen Region.
Conflict of interest: the authors of the clinical guidelines declare no conflict of interest.
For final editing and quality control, the guidelines were re-analyzed by the working group members, who concluded that all expert comments and feedback had been taken into account and the risk of systematic bias in guideline development was minimized.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Methods used for evidence collection/selection: electronic database search.
Description of methods used for assessing the quality and strength of evidence: the evidence base for the guidelines included publications from the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases. Literature search depth was 15 years.
Methods used to assess the quality and strength of evidence:
expert consensus;
assessment of significance in accordance with the rating scheme.
Methods used for evidence analysis:
reviews of published meta-analyses;
systematic reviews with evidence tables.
Description of methods used for evidence analysis
When selecting publications as potential sources of evidence, the methodology used in each study is examined to ensure its validity. The result of this examination affects the level of evidence assigned to the publication, which in turn affects the strength of the recommendations.
To minimize potential bias, each study was evaluated independently. Any discrepancies in evaluations were discussed by the full panel of authors. If a consensus could not be reached, an independent expert was involved.
Evidence tables: compiled by the authors of the clinical guidelines.
Methods used to formulate the recommendations: expert consensus.
Economic analysis
Cost analysis was not performed, and pharmacoeconomic publications were not analyzed.
Recommendation validation method
External expert review.
Internal expert review.
Description of the recommendation validation method
The draft of these recommendations was reviewed by independent experts who were primarily asked to comment on how comprehensible the interpretation of the evidence underlying the recommendations is.
Primary care physicians (pediatric endocrinologists) provided Comments regarding the clarity of these guidelines, as well as their assessment of the importance of the proposed recommendations as a tool for daily practice.
All Comments received from experts were thoroughly systematized and discussed by the working group members (authors of the guidelines). Each item was discussed separately.
Consultation and peer review
The draft recommendations were reviewed by independent experts who were primarily asked to comment on the clarity and accuracy of the interpretation of the evidence base underlying the recommendations.
Working Group
For final editing and quality control, the guidelines were re-analyzed by the working group members, who concluded that all expert remarks and Comments had been taken into account, and the risk of systematic bias in the development of the guidelines was minimized.
Key recommendations
The strength of recommendations (1–5) based on the corresponding levels of evidence (A–C) (Table P1 and Table P2) is provided alongside the text of the recommendations.
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
1. Pediatric endocrinologists;
2. Pediatricians;
3. General practitioners (family physicians).
Table 1. Level of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | There is only a rationale for the mechanism of action or expert opinion |
Table 2. Level of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definitions |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | There is only a rationale for the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion |
Table 3. Grade of Recommendation (GoR) scale for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.
The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Not used
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix C. Patient Information
Bread unit table
(1 BU = amount of food containing 10–12 g of carbohydrates)
Bread and bakery products* 1 XE = ....
1 slice | White bread | 20 g |
|---|---|---|
1 slice | Dark bread | 25 g |
Rusks | 15 g | |
Crackers (dry biscuits) | 15 g | |
1 tbsp | Breadcrumbs | 15 g |
* - foods such as pelmeni, blini, oladyi, pirozhki, syrniki, varenyky, and cutlets also contain carbohydrates, but the XE count depends on the size and recipe of the item.
Pasta 1 BU = ....
1–2 tablespoons depending on the shape of the item | Vermicelli, noodles, small pasta, macaroni * | 15 g |
|---|---|---|
* - refers to uncooked pasta; in cooked form, 1 XE is contained in
2–4 tablespoons of the product (50 g) depending on the shape of the item.
Cereals, corn, flour 1 BU = ....
1 tbsp | Buckwheat * | 15 g |
|---|---|---|
1/2 cob, medium | Corn | 100 g |
3 tbsp | Canned corn | 60 g |
4 tbsp | Cornflakes | 15 g |
10 tbsp | Popcorn ("popped" corn) | 15 g |
1 tbsp | Semolina * | 15 g |
1 tbsp | Flour (any) | 15 g |
1 tbsp | Oatmeal * | 15 g |
2 tbsp | Oat flakes * | 20 g |
1 tbsp | Pearl barley * | 15 g |
1 tbsp | Millet * | 15 g |
1 tbsp | Rice * | 15 g |
* - refers to 1 tablespoon of dry groats; in cooked form (porridge), 1 XE is contained in 2 heaped tablespoons (50 g).
Potato 1 XE = ....
1 piece, medium Raw and boiled potatoes | 75 g | |
|---|---|---|
2 tbsp | Mashed potatoes | 90 g |
2 tbsp | Fried potatoes | 35 g |
Dehydrated potato (chips) | 25 g | |
Milk and liquid dairy products 1 XE = ....
1 glass | Milk | 250 ml |
|---|---|---|
1 glass | Kefir | 250 ml |
1 glass | Cream | 250 ml |
Plain yogurt | 200 g |
Fruits and berries (with pits and skin) 1 XE = ....
2-3 pieces | Apricots | 110 g |
|---|---|---|
1 piece, large | Quince | 140 g |
1 piece (transverse slice) | Pineapple | 140 g |
1 slice | Watermelon | 270 g |
1 piece, medium | Orange | 150 g |
1/2 piece, medium | Banana | 70 g |
7 tbsp | Lingonberry | 140 g |
12 pieces, small | Grapes | 70 g |
15 pieces | Cherry | 90 g |
1 piece, medium | Pomegranate | 170 g |
1/2 piece, large | Grapefruit | 170 g |
1 piece, small | Pear | 90 g |
1 slice | Melon | 100 g |
8 tbsp | Blackberry | 140 g |
1 piece | Fig | 80 g |
1 piece, large | Kiwi | 110 g |
10 pieces, medium | Strawberry | 160 g |
6 tbsp | Gooseberries | 120 g |
8 tbsp | Raspberries | 160 g |
1/2 piece, small | Mango | 110 g |
2-3 pieces, medium | Mandarins | 150 g |
1 piece, medium | Peach | 120 g |
3-4 pieces, small | Plums | 90 g |
7 tbsp | Currants | 120 g |
1/2 piece, medium | Persimmon | 70 g |
7 tbsp | Blueberries | 90 g |
1 piece, small | Apple | 90 g |
1/2 cup | Fruit juice | 100 ml |
Dried fruits | 20 g |
Vegetables, legumes, nuts 1 XE = ....
3 pieces, medium | Carrots | 200 g |
|---|---|---|
1 piece, medium | Beets | 150 g |
1 tbsp, dry | Broad beans | 20 g |
7 tbsp, fresh | Peas | 100 g |
3 tbsp, boiled | Beans | 50 g |
Nuts | 60-90 g* |
* - depending on the type.
Other foods 1 XE = ....
2 tsp | Granulated sugar | 10 g |
|---|---|---|
2 pieces | Lump sugar | 10 g |
1/2 cup | Sugary carbonated water | 100 ml |
1 glass | Kvass | 250 ml |
Ice cream | 65 g | |
Chocolate | 20 g | |
Honey | 12 g |
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Not applicable