Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: clinical guidelines

Applies tochildren2024 editionQ23.4

Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, Pediatrics. 2024 edition, ICD-10 code: Q23.4.

Receive scientific articles on "Hypoplastic left heart syndrome"Every morning — fresh PubMed research on this topic and specialty: in Russian, with data, sample size, and conclusions. Plus updates to Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary based on the 2024 guideline text. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is a critical congenital heart defect characterized by underdevelopment of the left heart structures, ascending aorta, and/or aortic arch, where the left heart fails to provide adequate systemic cardiac output after birth. These guidelines cover rapid diagnosis, maintaining ductal patency, selecting staged surgical strategies, and interstage monitoring of newborns and children with HLHS.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Perform fetal echocardiography during prenatal screening: HLHS can be suspected starting from gestational weeks 16–18. → in text
  2. Immediately after birth, evaluate complaints and medical history, including information on prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease; perform an examination by a cardiologist or cardiovascular surgeon. Look for tachycardia, tachypnea, respiratory distress, cyanosis, rales, hepatomegaly, hypotension, and decreased peripheral perfusion. → in text
  3. During physical examination, measure blood pressure, auscultate the heart, and evaluate the abdomen: findings typically include a moderate systolic murmur along the left sternal border, a diminished or absent second heart sound over the aorta, and signs of enterocolitis such as intestinal pneumatosis or free peritoneal fluid. → in text
  4. Analyze acid-base balance and blood gases, including pH, BE, pCO2, pO2, and lactate; simultaneous samples from the upper and lower extremities are preferred. A saturation of 75–90% with a pCO2 of 40–50 mmHg and an acceptable pH indicates balanced blood flow, while a saturation above 90–93% with a pH below 7.3 and a pCO2 of 30–40 mmHg indicates a predominance of pulmonary blood flow. → in text
  5. Perform transthoracic echocardiography with color Doppler mapping as the primary postnatal diagnostic step. Determine the anatomy of the mitral and aortic valves, dimensions of the left ventricle, ascending aorta, and arch, presence of antegrade flow, dimensions of the interatrial communication and ductus arteriosus, abdominal aortic flow, and the function of the right ventricle and tricuspid valve. → in text
  6. Complement the evaluation with chest radiography and ECG: radiography reveals pulmonary plethora and edema, while ECG typically shows nonspecific signs of right heart overload. If echocardiography is inconclusive or contradictory, perform contrast-enhanced cardiac CT or cardiac and great vessel MRI. → in text
  7. Perform neurosonography in the newborn; additionally, perform neurosonography and/or brain CT and a neurological consultation prior to each stage of surgical correction. → in text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

How to confirm hypoplastic left heart syndrome?

The primary method is transthoracic echocardiography with color Doppler mapping. It must demonstrate a combination of hypoplasia or malformation of the mitral and/or aortic valves and underdevelopment of the left heart chambers, as well as evaluate the ductus arteriosus, interatrial communication, and right ventricular function. → in text

What dose of alprostadil should be used before surgery?

In a stable patient, 0.003–0.005 mcg/kg/min. In case of a restrictive arterial duct, decreased saturation, or lactic acidosis, the dose is increased to 0.01–0.05 mcg/kg/min. → in text

Should oxygen be administered if saturation is 75–85%?

No, supplemental oxygen therapy is not recommended at such saturation levels. At a saturation greater than 90% combined with lactic acidosis, hypotension, and oliguria, intubation and mechanical ventilation with FiO2 21% are indicated. → in text

When should balloon atrioseptostomy be performed?

When the pressure gradient across the interatrial communication exceeds 10 mmHg and marked metabolic disorders are present. In severe restriction or an intact atrial septum, the intervention is performed as an emergency within the first 3 hours of life; with a non-restrictive communication, atrioseptostomy is not performed prior to surgery. → in text

What is the timeline for the stages of surgical correction?

Norwood–Sano or Norwood–Blalock is performed within the first week of life. Bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis is performed at 2–10 months, and Fontan at 18–36 months; following a hybrid first stage, the second stage is performed at 3–5 months. → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
602, revision 2 (ID 602_2)
Publication date
November 29, 2024
Age category
children
ICD-10 codes
Q23.4
Specialties
CardiologyCardiovascular SurgeryMedical RehabilitationDiagnostic Radiology and Radiation TherapyPediatrics
Developers
Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia
All-Russian Public Organization "Association of Pediatric Cardiologists of Russia"
All-Russian Public Organization for the Promotion of the Development of Diagnostic Radiology and Therapy "Russian Society of Roentgenologists and Radiologists"
National Association of Experts in Spa and Resort Treatment
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Guidelines — 602_2

List of Abbreviations

Ao – aorta

BP – blood pressure

AV – aortic valve

ACG - angiocardiography

LVOT – left ventricular outflow tract

BCPA – bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis

VSD – ventricular septal defect

ASD – atrial septal defect

IMV – invasive mechanical ventilation

EDVI – end-diastolic volume index

CoA – coarctation of the aorta

CT – computed tomography

LV – left ventricle

LA – left atrium

MV – mitral valve

IAC – interatrial communication

MRI – magnetic resonance imaging

CIR – circulatory insufficiency

PDA – patent ductus arteriosus

PFO – patent foramen ovale

NICU – neonatal intensive care unit

PTFE – polytetrafluoroethylene

HLHS – hypoplastic left heart syndrome

MODS – multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

RR – respiratory rate

ECG – electrocardiography

EchoCG – echocardiography

Terms and Definitions

Hypoplasia is a term denoting underdevelopment of a tissue, organ, or entire organism caused by disruptions during embryogenesis.

Stenosis is an abnormal narrowing of any lumen or orifice, such as a blood vessel or heart valve.

Atresia is a congenital absence or acquired closure of natural body orifices and canals.

Cardiac catheterization and angiocardiography are an invasive diagnostic method for assessing central hemodynamics, involving direct measurement of pressure in the heart chambers, obtaining blood samples from them to assess blood gas composition, and contrast imaging.

"Left heart" is a conventional morphological unit that includes the left atrium, mitral valve, left ventricle, aortic valve, and aorta. Each of the listed structures plays an important role in ensuring the adequate functioning of the left heart chambers.

Hybrid stage I of HLHS surgical correction is a variant of the first stage of surgical hemodynamic correction of HLHS, consisting of separate pulmonary artery banding and stenting of the patent ductus arteriosus.

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome complex represents various combinations of the following six criteria: mitral valve hypoplasia without severe stenosis, left ventricle hypoplasia, left ventricular outflow tract narrowing, aortic valve hypoplasia without severe stenosis, aortic arch hypoplasia, and the presence of antegrade blood flow through the left heart chambers and ascending aorta. The combination of such anomalies usually does not lead to severe left ventricular dysfunction, which creates prerequisites for subsequent surgical conversion of hemodynamics via a biventricular pathway.

1. Brief information on the disease or condition


1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is a term used to describe variants of congenital heart disease represented by a wide spectrum of underdevelopment of the "left heart" structures. The main anatomical feature uniting the entire spectrum of left heart pathologies into a single hypoplastic left heart syndrome is pathology of the aortic and/or mitral valve (most often atresia) and, consequently, underdevelopment (hypoplasia) of the left heart structures, ascending aorta, and aortic arch [1-5,151].

The definition of hypoplastic left heart syndrome is functional rather than morphological, despite the fact that morphological anomalies are the main cause of functional failure of the left heart.

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome from a physiological perspective is the inability of the "left heart" to maintain adequate cardiac output immediately after birth due to the underdevelopment of one or more structures of the left half of the heart (prior to surgical or medical intervention). An important aspect in this situation is that the "left heart" is unable to maintain systemic cardiac output, which necessitates subsequent surgical conversion of hemodynamics via a single-ventricle pathway or requires heart transplantation to preserve biventricular hemodynamics [5].

Morphological criteria of the defect [5]:

HLHS includes various combinations of the following six lesions and underdevelopment of cardiovascular system structures in combination with left ventricular hypoplasia:

  1. mitral valve defect (marked hypoplasia; stenosis; atresia);

  2. fibroelastosis of the left-sided structures;

  3. aortic valve defect (marked hypoplasia; stenosis; atresia);

  4. ascending aorta hypoplasia;

  5. hypoplasia/interruption of the aortic arch;

  6. coarctation of the aorta;

A certain degree of left heart hypoplasia is present within a wide spectrum of "left heart" lesions. This spectrum varies from simple isolated lesions (e.g., discrete coarctation) to complex multi-level lesions (e.g., combination of aortic atresia, mitral atresia, and a rudimentary left ventricle). Thus, HLHS can develop either as a result of a severe anomaly of a single left ventricular structure (e.g., mitral atresia) or due to a combination of several milder anomalies (e.g., mitral stenosis, left ventricular hypoplasia, and aortic stenosis).

Associated defects:

The frequency of associated congenital heart defects in the setting of HLHS is about 25% [1,6]. Associated heart anomalies are variable and play an important role in determining treatment tactics. Associated intracardiac pathology can both complicate and "ease" the course of HLHS. Defects that improve prognosis may include ventricular septal defect (VSD, ASD, partial or total anomalous pulmonary venous return). Factors that significantly worsen the prognosis of the course and treatment of HLHS include structural abnormalities of the right heart chambers, namely tricuspid valve and pulmonary valve involvement; restrictive IAC or intact atrial septum.

Other associated anomalies are much less common and are represented by the following pathologies:

  • common atrioventricular canal (unbalanced form);

  • total anomalous pulmonary venous return;

  • discordant ventriculoarterial connection;

  • coronary sinus atresia;

  • pulmonary venous atresia;

  • quadricusp pulmonary valve;

  • duplication of the pulmonary valve orifice

  • ventriculocoronary fistulae, etc. [1,5-7,66,139,140].

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with restrictive or intact atrial septum:

A restrictive or intact atrial septum is present in 6–20% of fetuses with HLHS [141-142]. Typically, these infants have one of three types of left atrium:

Type A: a relatively large left atrium with a thick septum secundum and a thin septum primum fused together, with massively dilated pulmonary veins. The decompression pathway from the left atrium (LA) may lead to the innominate vein, the right superior vena cava, and the right atrium (total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage).

Type B: a small, hypertrophied LA with circumferential atrial wall thickening and a thick muscular interatrial septum without a clear distinction between the septum primum and septum secundum. The pulmonary veins are usually small.

Type C: a giant left atrium with a thin interatrial septum bowing to the right in the setting of severe mitral regurgitation. The pulmonary veins are usually enlarged [60, 143-144].

After birth, in infants with HLHS and an intact atrial septum, pulmonary blood flow increases 5-fold compared to intrauterine hemodynamics, leading to profound hypoxemia and a high risk of mortality. Most commonly, left atrial hypertension leads to pulmonary edema, which in turn increases resistance to antegrade pulmonary blood flow, exacerbating hypoxemia [145].

Intrauterine elevation of pulmonary vascular pressure leads to "nutmeg lung", representing terminal damage. Microscopically, the main feature of "nutmeg lung" is lymphangiectasia (enlarged lymphatic vessels); macroscopically, the lungs acquire a "cobblestone" appearance. Due to impaired blood outflow from the left atrium, rapid clinical deterioration occurs, and without surgical treatment, such infants die within the first 3 days of life [147-150].

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

To date, the etiopathogenesis of HLHS is not fully understood. It remains unclear whether the etiology is the same for all cases of this pathology. Abnormal formation and leftward displacement of the septum primum are frequently noted and may be one of the causes of HLHS development. However, the most likely cause of HLHS is aortic and mitral valve pathology [7,53]. According to autopsy studies, practically all cases of HLHS involve aortic and/or mitral valve lesions. The severity of these lesions can vary significantly from case to case [5,7]. The influence of genetic factors on the development of HLHS in some patients has also been proven, but these factors are numerous, complex, and currently poorly understood [51,54].

Some researchers propose another embryological mechanism for the onset of HLHS: primary impaired formation of the patent foramen ovale with its restriction or atresia in early stages of fetal development, leading to a decrease or absence of blood flow through the left heart chambers, which in turn results in their hypoplasia [7,52].

The formation of the aortic arch and brachiocephalic arteries in the vast majority of HLHS cases proceeds uneventfully, while hypoplasia of the ascending aorta and arch is caused by the absence or sharp reduction of antegrade blood flow therein due to aortic valve stenosis as another primary mechanism of HLHS development. Arch anomalies may occur in cases associated with interrupted aortic arch or coarctation of the aorta [5,7,52].

Genetic syndromes

Genetic syndromes are present in ~10–25% of patients with HLHS. The most frequent syndromes include Turner, Noonan, Holt-Oram, trisomies, CHARGE association, and Jacobsen syndrome [152-154].

Pathophysiology

In aortic and mitral atresia or aortic atresia with mitral stenosis, systemic circulation is maintained by the right ventricle via retrograde blood flow in the aortic arch through the patent ductus arteriosus. In patients with a milder form of HLHS with aortic and mitral stenosis, systemic circulation may depend only partially on right ventricular function and the patent ductus arteriosus, since antegrade flow in the ascending aorta and aortic arch is provided by the left ventricle. In rare cases, with borderline left ventricle dimensions and moderate stenosis of the mitral and aortic valves, systemic blood supply may be provided entirely by the left ventricle, although such patients usually present with severe congestive heart failure requiring surgical intervention [145].

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

HLHS is the fourth most common congenital heart defect diagnosed in the neonatal period and the most frequent defect with single-ventricle hemodynamics. Its frequency among all congenital heart defects ranges from 1.4 to 9%. The prevalence of this syndrome per 1000 live births is 0.16–0.2, and this CHD occurs twice as often in males as in females [8-11,55,58].

The clinical course of the defect largely depends on the degree of hypoplasia of the left heart structures. Without surgical intervention, virtually all infants with HLHS die by 6 months of age, with 25% of deaths occurring in the first week of life [10,56-57,146].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

Q23.4 – Hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

There is no universally accepted classification of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Clinical practice utilizes a classification based on the morphology of the left heart valves. Five anatomical subtypes of HLHS are distinguished:

  • aortic and mitral stenosis;

  • aortic and mitral atresia;

  • aortic atresia and mitral stenosis;

  • aortic stenosis and mitral atresia

  • hypoplastic left heart complex [5,33].

The most severe form of HLHS is the variant with mitral and aortic valve atresia, which results in the absence of antegrade blood flow in the ascending aorta. Systemic hemodynamics in such a situation is possible only if fetal communications are present, namely: a patent ductus arteriosus and an interatrial communication.

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

The clinical presentation after birth can vary significantly depending on the morphological subtype of HLHS; nevertheless, patients with HLHS frequently exhibit signs such as:

  1. tachycardia;

  2. dyspnea;

  3. acrocyanosis/cyanosis, worsening with agitation;

  4. hepatomegaly

  5. low blood pressure

In the neonatal period, infants with HLHS typically present with mild cyanosis, respiratory distress syndrome, and tachycardia. Without supportive measures (maintaining the patency of fetal communications: the foramen ovale and ductus arteriosus), rapid deterioration can occur with swift progression of heart failure and patient death (due to pulmonary hyperperfusion leading to pulmonary edema and critical systemic hypoperfusion). Simultaneously, peripheral pulses are markedly diminished (or absent), with signs of decreased peripheral perfusion, centralization of circulation, and low blood pressure. Palpation reveals hepatomegaly.

Spontaneous closure of the ductus arteriosus without prostaglandin infusion is inevitable, but the timing of natural ductal closure varies from hours to weeks, or sometimes months. And as previously noted, closure of the ductus arteriosus is accompanied by rapid circulatory collapse.

Approximately 5% to 6% of infants with HLHS have significant blood flow obstruction at the level of the atrial septum (restrictive interatrial communication). When present, this obstruction causes severe impairment of blood outflow from the left atrium (especially in mitral atresia or critical mitral stenosis). This subsequently leads to impaired pulmonary venous drainage, which in turn results in postcapillary pulmonary hypertension and lung injury. Newborns with marked obstruction to blood flow at the atrial septum level typically exhibit critically low systemic blood oxygenation and almost always show signs of developing and progressing pulmonary edema. This situation is critical and requires urgent surgical intervention (atrioseptostomy) [59-61].

Auscultation in HLHS typically reveals a moderate systolic murmur along the left sternal border due to a functioning patent ductus arteriosus. In the presence of heart failure or a restrictive foramen ovale, crepitant rales may be auscultated over the lung fields.

Capillary blood gas analysis is extremely critical for assessing the severity of the patient's condition and allows evaluation of the balance of blood flow between the systemic and pulmonary circulations (for details, see the laboratory diagnostics section).

Plain chest radiography typically reveals cardiomegaly due to enlargement of the right heart chambers. The lung fields show signs of pulmonary hypervolemia.

ECG changes are usually non-specific and present with signs of right heart strain.

Echocardiography is the primary diagnostic method for HLHS, allowing visualization of the signs of the defect with a high degree of certainty both postnatally and prenatally, starting from the 16th week of pregnancy. Echocardiography makes it possible to identify all necessary signs of the defect, namely: hypoplasia and abnormal structure of the mitral and aortic valves; hypoplasia of the ascending aorta; detection or exclusion of antegrade flow through the mitral and aortic valves and the ascending aorta; determination of the linear dimensions of the left ventricle; determination of the degree of left ventricular fibroelastosis; dimensions of the interatrial communication, etc. [5,7,10,12].

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

Prenatal echocardiographic examination is of great importance, as it allows suspecting HLHS at 16–18 weeks of gestation [12]. Immediately after birth, the vast majority of newborns are in a critical condition, requiring the fastest possible transfer of the patient to a specialized facility.

Diagnostic criteria for establishing a diagnosis

Symptoms:

  • dyspnea;

  • palpitations.

Anamnesis: prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease.

Physical examination:

  • tachycardia;

  • dyspnea;

  • respiratory disorders;

  • lung rales;

  • hepatomegaly;

  • cyanosis of varying severity;

  • intestinal pneumatosis, free fluid in the abdominal cavity (signs of enterocolitis development);

  • moderate systolic murmur along the left sternal border (the second sound over the aorta is single-component, often attenuated or absent).

Laboratory tests: do not provide characteristic information for HLHS.

Instrumental Studies:

Targeted chest X-ray:

  • hyperemia with interstitial or alveolar pulmonary edema (or without edema).

  • targeted chest X-ray also allows identifying concomitant lung diseases (pneumonia, meconium aspiration, atelectasis, etc.).

ECG (electrocardiogram recording, interpretation, description, and analysis of electrocardiographic data)

  • ECG changes are non-specific and manifest as signs of right heart strain, namely:

  1. peaked, widened P waves in leads II, III, and aVF;

  2. rightward axis deviation;

  3. signs of right ventricular enlargement with the appearance of R waves in V1, or qR in the right precordial leads, rS waves in V5-V6.

Echocardiography with color Doppler mapping:

  • allows detecting hypoplasia, abnormal structure, stenosis, or atresia of the mitral valve; hypoplasia, stenosis, or atresia of the aortic valve; hypoplasia of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and/or aortic isthmus; detecting or excluding the presence of antegrade flow through the mitral and aortic valves; determining the linear dimensions of the left ventricle and the severity of fibroelastosis; the dimensions of the interatrial communication and patent ductus arteriosus; assessing blood flow in the abdominal aorta, and evaluating right ventricular and tricuspid valve function.

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

  • At the stage of diagnosis refinement, it is recommended to perform an examination, a thorough collection of anamnesis and complaints in all patients (parents of patients) with suspected HLHS in order to determine the severity of the condition and treatment tactics [5,7,10].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

2.2 Physical Examination

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to be evaluated by a cardiologist or cardiovascular surgeon (initial examination/consultation by a cardiologist, initial examination/consultation by a pediatric cardiologist, initial examination/consultation by a cardiovascular surgeon) to assess the severity of the patient's condition [5,7,10].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

  • All patients with HLHS during physical examination are recommended to pay attention to the presence of dyspnea and cyanosis, and to keep in mind the high frequency of respiratory disorders in this group of patients during the first days of life [5,7,10].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: It is important to understand that the clinical presentation after birth can vary significantly depending on the class and anatomical subtype of HLHS. Patients with this diagnosis almost always present with signs of circulatory failure and/or respiratory failure (tachycardia; dyspnea; rales in the lungs; cyanosis; enlargement of the liver borders). In most cases, there is a decrease in tissue and organ perfusion, accompanied by peripheral spasm and low blood pressure. With pronounced cardiac dysfunction, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) rapidly develops. There is no direct correlation between the severity of the condition and the degree of cyanosis. Severe cyanosis is often caused by restricted blood flow through the patent foramen ovale (PFO), or concomitant cardiac/extracardiac pathology (total anomalous pulmonary venous return with collector stenosis, diaphragmatic hernias, etc.).

  • In all patients with suspected HLHS, cardiac auscultation (auscultation for heart and pericardial pathology) is recommended to detect heart murmurs [5,7,10].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: HLHS is characterized by a moderate systolic murmur along the left sternal border (the second sound over the aorta is single-component, often attenuated or absent) [5,7,10].

All patients with HLHS are recommended to have their blood pressure measured to assess systolic and diastolic pressure [1,4-5,7,10].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: due to the absence of direct ejection (critical reduction of ejection) of blood through the ascending aorta, systemic blood pressure depends on the presence and size of the PDA, as well as the pulmonary-to-systemic vascular resistance ratio

  • In newborn infants with HLHS, it is recommended to assess peristalsis by abdominal auscultation. It is also necessary to perform abdominal percussion and palpation to detect intestinal pneumatosis and free fluid in the abdominal cavity (signs of enterocolitis development) [5,7,10,58-59,75].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: immediately after birth, when pulmonary vascular resistance remains relatively high and the arterial duct is wide, the physical examination results are most often close to normal (with adequate oxygenation and systemic perfusion). This is due to the balance between the volume of blood directed to the pulmonary circulation for oxygenation and the volume delivered to the systemic circulation. However, as pulmonary vascular resistance naturally drops, more blood is shunted through the pulmonary vasculature at the expense of systemic circulation, leading to tachypnea, relative hypotension, and the development of acidosis. When the arterial duct begins to close, systemic perfusion deteriorates further. Symptoms in such newborns usually appear within the first few hours of life or at 2 to 3 days of age, starting with signs of enterocolitis and respiratory distress syndrome, and without intervention, they rapidly progress to heart failure and shock.

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

There are no specific laboratory diagnostics for HLHS.

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo acid-base balance and blood gas testing (pH, BE, pCO2, PO2, Lac — capillary/arterial/venous blood samples) to assess the severity of hypoxemia and the degree of metabolic disorders (simultaneous blood samples from the upper and lower extremities are preferred) [5,7,10,12].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: capillary blood gas analysis allows assessing the balance of blood flow between the pulmonary and systemic circulations:

  1. if before the initiation of treatment, arterial blood oxygen saturation is within 75–90%, pH fluctuates within acceptable values, and pCO2 is at 40–50 mmHg, this indicates that blood flows are balanced

  2. if the arterial blood oxygen saturation level is greater than 90–93% combined with metabolic acidosis (pH < 7.3) and pCO2 is at 30–40 mmHg, the situation should be regarded as a shift in balance towards pulmonary blood flow, and appropriate correction of therapy should be performed, as discussed below.

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo a general (clinical) urinalysis and a general (clinical) blood test including total hemoglobin and hematocrit assessment, red blood cell, white blood cell, and platelet counts, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as part of the initial evaluation upon admission to the hospital, including prior to surgical treatment, during follow-up at least once a year, and in the postoperative period if necessary [5,10,62-63].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

  • For all patients with HLHS admitted to a specialized inpatient facility for surgical correction of the defect who are expected to receive donor blood and/or its components, it is recommended to determine the main blood groups using the ABO system, the D antigen of the Rhesus system (Rh factor), the C, c, E, e, Cw, K, k antigen phenotype, and to screen for anti-erythrocyte antibodies [5,10,62,176-177].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

  • For all patients with HLHS admitted to an inpatient facility for surgical treatment, it is recommended to determine Hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in the blood; to determine antibodies to Hepatitis C virus in the blood; to determine antibodies to Treponema pallidum in the blood; to determine IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 in the blood; to determine IgM and IgG antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 in the blood to rule out associated HIV infection, hepatitis, and syphilis [5,10,62,174-175].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

  • Before performing a surgical intervention, all patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo a coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis study) (determination of activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), international normalized ratio (INR), and blood fibrinogen level) to rule out congenital and acquired blood coagulation disorders, and to predict postoperative thrombosis and bleeding [5,7,10,62,178-179].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: if the patient presents with hemorrhagic syndrome and/or laboratory signs of blood coagulation disorders in the preoperative period, surgical intervention should ideally be postponed until the cause of these disorders is identified and corrected.

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo a routine general biochemical blood test (levels of potassium, sodium, chlorides, glucose, creatinine, total protein, albumin, urea, total and conjugated bilirubin in the blood, serum iron, and the activity of aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase in the blood) to assess renal and hepatic function as part of the initial evaluation upon admission to the inpatient facility, including for surgical treatment, during follow-up at least once a year, and in the postoperative period when necessary [5,10,43,44].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

  • For all patients with HLHS who undergo thromboprophylaxis with heparin preparations (B01AB Heparin group) after surgical treatment, laboratory monitoring of the efficacy of these medicinal products is recommended [178,179,197,198].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: When using unfractionated heparin (B01AB Heparin group), it is recommended to determine the APTT (activated partial thromboplastin time) (the optimal target range for children is 60–85 seconds) and measure the blood heparin level (anti-Xa assay): the optimal range is 0.35–0.7. When using low-molecular-weight heparin preparations (B01AB Heparin group), it is recommended to measure the blood heparin level (anti-Xa assay): the optimal range is 0.5–1.0 [178,179,197,198].

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

The definitive diagnosis of HLHS is established using imaging methods that confirm morphological features of the defect and functional insufficiency of the left ventricle. Another goal of instrumental diagnostics is to detect associated congenital anomalies (if present).

  • All patients with suspected HLHS are recommended to undergo a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) using color Doppler flow mapping to determine the anatomical features of the defect and select the optimal surgical strategy [7,10,13-15,62-64].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: this study allows for the identification of all essential features of the defect: hypoplasia, abnormal structure, stenosis, or atresia of the mitral valve; hypoplasia, stenosis, or atresia of the aortic valve; hypoplasia of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and/or aortic isthmus; detection or exclusion of antegrade flow through the mitral and aortic valves; measurement of left ventricular linear dimensions and the severity of fibroelastosis; dimensions of the interatrial communication and patent ductus arteriosus; assessment of blood flow in the abdominal aorta; and evaluation of right ventricular and tricuspid valve function.

Transesophageal echocardiography is recommended when clinically indicated if transthoracic echocardiographic visualization is suboptimal, for a detailed assessment of the valvular apparatus, as well as intraoperatively during surgery to assess surgical results, and pre- and postoperatively when necessary [7,10,13-15,180-181].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

  • Neonatal patients with HLHS are not recommended to undergo transvenous cardiac catheterization and panaortography [5,10,55,182].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: It should be noted that the administration of even a small volume of contrast medium to patients with HLHS leads to the worsening of pre-existing renal failure. Angiocardiography (ACG) may be indicated in neonates with HLHS when echocardiography and/or computed tomography raises suspicion of coronary artery anomalies or abnormal branching of the brachiocephalic vessels [10].

  • In cases where echocardiographic data are insufficient or contradictory for verifying the diagnosis, patients with suspected HLHS are recommended to undergo contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the heart or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the heart and great vessels [16-17].

LE 4, GR C – for CT

LE 5, GR C – for MRI

Comments: MRI and CT help to clarify the morphology of the defect, determine the spatial relationship of the cardiac structures and great vessels, and are also important for diagnosing concomitant intracardiac/extracardiac malformations. In addition, tomographic techniques are used in borderline sizes of the left heart chambers, which allows clarifying the feasibility of biventricular repair and surgical management in this group of patients.

  • All patients with suspected HLHS are recommended to undergo targeted chest X-ray to rule out other heart and great vessel diseases, as well as extra-cardiac pathology (pathology of other mediastinal organs, lungs, pleura), to clarify the anatomical features of this congenital heart disease, the state of the lesser circulation and detect pulmonary congestion, and pre- and/or postoperatively when surgical treatment is performed [5,7,10,13,55,155].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: plain chest radiography almost always reveals hypervascularity with interstitial or alveolar pulmonary edema (or without edema). Chest X-ray also allows for the detection of concomitant pulmonary diseases (pneumonia, meconium aspiration, atelectasis, etc.).

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo electrocardiography (ECG) (recording of the electrocardiogram, interpretation, description, and analysis of electrocardiographic data) to assess cardiac rhythm and conduction [5,7,10,55].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: ECG changes are usually non-specific and manifest as signs of right heart overload, specifically:

  1. peaked, widened P waves in leads II, III, and aVF;

  2. rightward axis deviation;

  3. signs of right ventricular enlargement with the appearance of R waves in V1, or qR in the right precordial leads, rS waves in V5-V6.

2.5 Other Procedures

All neonatal patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo neurosonography to rule out brain malformations [45].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: HLHS is frequently associated with genetic disorders and central nervous system malformations. Neurosonography in these patients can reveal gross structural abnormalities, which helps determine the optimal surgical correction strategy.

  • A newborn with HLHS, before and after medical or surgical intervention (up until discharge from the inpatient facility), is recommended to undergo continuous bedside vital sign monitoring (heart rate measurement, 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, pulse oximetry) to monitor the patient's condition [10,64,74].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo transesophageal echocardiography before the final stage of the operation under cardiopulmonary bypass to check the quality of the surgical intervention [10,19,64].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo electrocardiography recording (interpretation, description, and analysis of electrocardiographic data) before discharge from the inpatient facility following surgical intervention to assess the quality of the surgical procedure [10,19,64].

LE 5, GR C

  • All patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) and risk factors for infectious complications upon admission to the inpatient unit are recommended to undergo microbiological (culture) examination of tonsillar and posterior pharyngeal wall mucus for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, microbiological (culture) examination of feces for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms, and microbiological (culture) examination of conjunctival discharge for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic opportunistic microorganisms to determine colonization by microorganisms [183-194].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments:postoperative infectious complications in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are a serious problem[183-185], since this group of patients has a number of characteristic risk factors for their development (frequent combination of CHD with other congenital anomalies and malformations, invasiveness and duration of the surgical procedure, use of cardiopulmonary bypass, blood loss, hypothermia, etc.[186].In addition, such patients are often initially colonized by multiresistant microflora. This is due to the fact that prior to cardiac surgery, most children with CHD receive treatment in somatic hospitals, including the use of systemic antibacterial drugs, which is a significant risk factor for the colonization of open body biocenoses. When such microorganisms, resistant to systemic antibacterial drugs, are introduced into the hospital, preconditions are created for the emergence of nosocomial outbreaks as well as the deterioration of the hospital's microbiological landscape.[187-188].It is known that the most effective way to reduce the risk of infectious complications is the implementation of a set of infection control measures.[189-190].In this regard, it is recommended to perform molecular biological testing of oropharyngeal mucosa swabs for methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative Staphylococcus spp, molecular biological testing of oropharyngeal mucosa swabs to detect acquired bacterial carbapenemase genes, molecular biological testing of oropharyngeal mucosa swabs for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, PCR-based molecular biological testing to detect acquired bacterial carbapenemases in rectal mucosa swabs, PCR-based determination of class metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) acquired bacterial carbapenemase genes of the VIM, IMP, and NDM groups in rectal mucosa swabs, and PCR-based detection of class metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) acquired carbapenemase genes of the VIM, IMP, and NDM groups in oropharyngeal mucosa swabs.[189,191-193]. Screening results should not serve as a guide for prescribing antimicrobial therapy in the absence of clinical signs of an infectious process, but may be taken into account when prescribing empirical therapy in the event of infection manifestation. Data obtained from screening are part of microbiological monitoring and determine the set of anti-epidemic measures that must be carried out upon hospitalization of a patient colonized by multiresistant flora.[194].

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

Delivery

Delivery should take place in a hospital of level 3 or higher to ensure a more accurate initial assessment of the newborn's condition and subsequent stabilization (catheterization of the cubital and other peripheral veins or catheterization of the subclavian and other central veins, initiation of prostaglandin infusion, and resuscitation measures). Due to the need for surgical intervention in the neonatal period, it is optimal to perform delivery in a hospital setting located near a specialized cardiac center [68]. Delivery can be performed either via spontaneous vaginal delivery or planned cesarean section. Planned uncomplicated delivery is optimally performed at 39 weeks of gestation (since delivery even at 37–38 weeks is associated with higher risks of adverse outcomes) [141, 156-157].

  • Delivery of a fetus with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and a restrictive oval foramen or intact atrial septum

Delivery of a fetus with HLHS and a restrictive patent foramen ovale or intact atrial septum is optimally performed in a specialized cardiac surgery center or in close proximity to it, to enable emergency intervention for left atrial decompression (balloon atrioseptostomy or creation of an atrial septal defect with stenting, connection of an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) system). In this case, a planned cesarean section may be required for optimal coordination of multidisciplinary care [141, 159].

After the child's birth, a pediatric cardiologist must confirm the diagnosis of HLHS and conduct a joint consultation with the parents alongside a cardiovascular surgeon (pediatric cardiac surgeon). If extracardiac anomalies are detected, chromosomal aberration testing is indicated to obtain additional information and refine the prognosis [145].

In cases of a prenatally established diagnosis of HLHS, delivery is recommended to be performed in a specialized hospital with a neonatal intensive care unit, within close transport accessibility to a cardiac surgery center [5,10,64-70].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

  • All patients with a prenatally established diagnosis of HLHS immediately after delivery are recommended to be transferred to the NICU for monitoring of vital functions (heart rate measurement, respiratory rate, pulse oximetry, and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring) and stabilization of the patient's condition [5,10,64-70].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

  • All newborn patients with HLHS after stabilization of their condition in the NICU are recommended to be transferred to the nearest cardiac surgery hospital within the first 24–48 hours of life [5,10,64-70,116].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: for unstable newborns (including those with restrictive arterial duct and atrial communication, pulmonary venous stenosis): transport is optimally carried out within the first 24 hours of life, provided the patient is transportable [160].

3.1 Conservative Treatment

Brief algorithm for preoperative management of stable patients:

  1. minimization of handling [49,78];

  2. organization of adequate monitoring with control of respiratory rate (RR), PDA size by echocardiography, ECG, pulse oximetry on upper and lower extremities, and blood pressure measurement in peripheral arteries [161-163];

  3. initiation of infusion of C01EA prostaglandins [48,49,64,65,72,101-103,160,167];

  4. fluid loading in accordance with standard neonatal guidelines, while fluid balance should be closely monitored [145];

  5. enteral nutrition remains controversial! However, it has been proven that enteral nutrition, especially with breast milk, can reduce the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis provided adequate blood flow in the lower half of the body is maintained [164-166].

Brief algorithm for preoperative management of unstable patients:

  1. organization of adequate monitoring with control of respiratory rate (RR), PDA size by echocardiography, ECG, pulse oximetry on upper and lower extremities, and blood pressure measurement in the right upper extremity [161-163];

  2. initiation of infusion of C01EA prostaglandins to maintain ductus arteriosus patency and adequate systemic circulation. However, it must be remembered that (C01EA) prostaglandins have two clinically significant dose-dependent side effects: hypotension (especially in patients in shock) and vasodilatory effects (risk of bleeding and necrotizing enterocolitis). At the same time, high doses of C01EA prostaglandins do not lead to further PDA enlargement, especially under conditions of decompensated acidosis, so the general trend is to minimize the dose of prostaglandins [48,49,64,65,72,101-103,160,167];

  3. stabilization of the condition by striving to normalize the ratio between pulmonary (Qp) and systemic blood flow (Qs) to unity (Qp=Qs). If necessary, transfer the patient to mechanical ventilation (normoventilation mode with FiO2 21% is indicated) [49,145];

  4. correction of severe acidosis, but it should be remembered that moderate acidosis helps limit pulmonary blood flow by increasing pulmonary vascular resistance. Therefore, pH correction should be performed with caution, otherwise pulmonary vascular resistance may decrease significantly and the Qp/Qs ratio may shift toward the pulmonary circulation with a decrease in systemic blood flow and subsequent delayed worsening of systemic acidosis. However, patients in shock and profound metabolic acidosis require correction of base deficit. When administering alkaline agents (sodium bicarbonate**), one should aim to optimize Qp/Qs to unity (Qp=Qs) [145,162,168];

  5. maintain adequate body temperature and avoid patient hypothermia (especially during transport) [160,196].

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to have a venous line placed (catheterization of the cubital and other peripheral veins or catheterization of the subclavian and other central veins) [10,65,67,71].

Level of Evidence (LoE) 3, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C

Comments: in stable condition, placement of one or two peripheral venous lines is sufficient (catheterization of the cubital and other peripheral veins). In case of clinical deterioration or initial severity (low saturation levels, lactic acidosis, respiratory disorders), placement of a central venous line is required (catheterization of the subclavian and other central veins) [10,65-71].

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to receive an infusion of C01EA prostaglandin group drugs immediately after establishing venous access [48,49,64,65,72,101-103].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: infusion of #alprostadil** is carried out in stable patients until surgical intervention at a rate of 0.003-0.005 mcg/kg/min. In case of a restrictive patent ductus arteriosus (Echocardiography data, decreased saturation, lactic acidosis), an increase in the #alprostadil** dose from 0.01 to 0.05 mcg/kg/min is recommended [10,48,49,64,65,72,76-78,101-103,200].

  • All patients with HLHS with maintained saturation levels within 75-85% are not recommended to receive additional oxygen therapy [5,10,72-73,77].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

  • All patients with HLHS in a stable condition without pronounced metabolic disorders are not recommended to be switched to mechanical ventilation [49,72].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

  • In patients with HLHS with saturation > 90% combined with lactic acidosis, arterial hypotension, and oliguria, recommended procedures include tracheal intubation and switching to mechanical ventilation with 21% fraction of inspired oxygen (air) [5,10,49,65,71-73].

LoE 2, GoR C

Comments: if hyperoxia and hypocapnia persist in blood gas analysis, the oxygen concentration in the breathing mixture should be reduced to 17-19% by increasing the nitrogen fraction. Mechanical ventilation should be continued until the patient's condition stabilizes.

  • Conservative treatment for all patients with HLHS with decreased right ventricular function (heart failure) is recommended to be performed according to the following algorithm: first, exclude excessive pulmonary blood flow; second, exclude systemic hypovolemia; third, initiate an infusion of nitroferricyanide derivatives or peripheral antiadrenergic agents under blood pressure monitoring [5,7,10,72,76-78,104-108].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: in case of progressive deterioration in patients with HLHS, an infusion of nitroferricyanide derivatives with systemic vasodilating effects is prescribed (sodium nitroprusside dihydrate at an initial dose of 0.3 mcg/kg/min with subsequent dose titration under blood pressure and blood gas monitoring until the desired effect is achieved) or an infusion of #levosimendan** (belonging to other cardiotonic agents with additional vasodilating action) at 0.05-0.2 mcg/kg/min is prescribed [105,107-108]. If ineffective, initiation of cardiotonic agents excluding cardiac glycosides is recommended. With the progression of heart failure, prescribing drugs from the pharmacotherapeutic group of adrenergic and dopaminergic agents is necessary: dobutamine** or dopamine** is recommended (at intravenous doses of 4-6 mcg/kg/min with subsequent titration to the desired effect (maximum 10 mcg/kg/min)); if the aforementioned drugs are insufficiently effective, additional administration of #epinephrine** is required (at an initial dose of 0.01 mcg/kg/min with subsequent dose titration under blood pressure and blood gas monitoring until the desired effect is achieved) [72,104-106].

Not recommended is therapy with high doses of adrenergic and dopaminergic agents [5,7,10,72,76-78,104-108].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: high doses of adrenergic and dopaminergic agents also lead to an increase in peripheral systemic vascular resistance, which in turn redirects most of the output from the single functional right ventricle towards the pulmonary circulation, further aggravating the patient's condition. The doses of adrenergic and dopaminergic agents should be increased concurrently with systemic vasodilators.

  • All patients with HLHS with risk factors for infection are recommended to receive systemic antibacterial drugs (initiating therapy in the maternity hospital if necessary and continuing administration for 48–72 hours, i.e., until cultures taken prior to therapy are negative) [79-80,109-111].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: risk factors for infection in a newborn include: acute infectious process in the mother in late pregnancy (immediately before delivery); fetoplacental insufficiency; detection of pericardial, pleural effusion, or ascites in the newborn, presence of cysts and calcifications in the brain; leukocytosis in the newborn's complete blood count (more than 20 x 109/L); elevated serum C-reactive protein and/or procalcitonin levels. If an infectious pathogen is identified, etiopathogenetic administration of systemic antibacterial drugs at age-appropriate dosages is required. If risk factors are present without pathogen identification, other beta-lactam antibacterial drugs or beta-lactam penicillins are prescribed at age-appropriate dosages with subsequent adjustment of antibacterial therapy if necessary. In severe cases, reserve antibacterial drugs are appropriate: carbapenems, vancomycin**, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, polymyxins. In the absence of risk factors, antibiotics (systemic antibacterial drugs) are not prescribed [79-80,109-111,188-191,194].

  • All patients with HLHS with restrictive interatrial communication confirmed by ultrasound diagnostics, severe metabolic disorders, and low saturation levels are recommended to undergo tracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, dose escalation of C01EA prostaglandin group drugs, administration of muscle relaxants at calculated doses, and initiation of additional oxygen therapy [5,7,10,72,76-78,101-103].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: other intensive care measures are usually ineffective in this situation.

  • Patients with HLHS at high risk of thrombosis after surgical treatment are recommended to undergo thromboprophylaxis with heparin and its derivatives (B01AB heparin group) [178,179,197,198].

Level of Evidence (LoE) 3, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C

Comments: High-risk thrombosis groups include patients with a history of thrombosis, thrombophilia, infectious complications, and multiple organ failure [179].

Thromboprophylaxis with unfractionated sodium heparin** should be initiated with a bolus of 75 IU/kg in children, followed by intravenous infusion at a rate of: 28 IU/kg/h in children under 1 year of age, and 20 IU/kg/h in children older than 1 year. Dose adjustments are made based on laboratory test results.

Thromboprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (B01AB heparin group) is administered as follows: #enoxaparin sodium** (off-label in children under 18 years) in children under 2 months – 0.75 mg/kg, in children older than 2 months – 0.5 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours; dalteparin sodium – in children from 1 month to 2 years 150 IU/kg, from 2 to 8 years – 125 IU/kg, older than 8 years – 100 IU/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours, with blood heparin level monitoring (anti-Xa assay) in accordance with the instructions. Fondaparinux sodium (off-label in children under 17 years); #fondaparinux sodium may be used in children older than 1 year at a dose of 0.1 mg/kg once daily subcutaneously. Dose adjustments are made based on laboratory test results [178,179,197,198].

  • Patients with HLHS after Norwood-Blalock or Norwood-Sano procedures are recommended to receive thromboprophylaxis [178,179,197,198].

Level of Evidence (LoE) 3, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C

Comments: in the early postoperative period, thromboprophylaxis should be carried out using heparin and its derivatives (B01AB heparin group), and subsequently

  • Patients with HLHS after bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis (BCPA) or Fontan operation are recommended to receive thromboprophylaxis [178,179,197,198,199].

Level of Evidence (LoE) 3, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C

Comments: in the early postoperative period, thromboprophylaxis should be carried out using heparin and its derivatives (B01AB heparin group), and thereafter – with vitamin K antagonists monitored by INR (target range 2.0-3.0) [178] or rivaroxaban granules for oral suspension with blood heparin level monitoring (anti-Xa assay), target range 0.5-1.0 [199].

3.2 Surgical Treatment

Surgical treatment for patients with HLHS is divided into two main categories:

  1. Traditional staged surgical palliative treatment (where the Norwood procedure is performed as the first stage);

  2. Modified methods, where the approach to the initial intervention is altered (a hybrid approach or performing bilateral pulmonary artery banding with prolonged infusion of C01EA prostaglandins until the second stage of hemodynamic correction, which may also vary—either the Norwood-Blalock or Norwood-Sano procedure, or a direct Norwood-bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis).

In all cases, the Fontan procedure must serve as the final stage.

The Norwood operation (the first stage for traditional staged surgical treatment and the second stage for modified methods). The main steps of this operation have remained unchanged since it was first performed, namely: 1) creation of an unobstructed outflow from the functionally single right ventricle into the reconstructed neoaorta (ensuring adequate antegrade systemic blood flow); 2) ensuring unobstructed venous return from the pulmonary veins to the right atrium via an atrial septal communication; 3) creation of controlled pulmonary blood flow (metered pulmonary blood flow) [67,112]. While the first two steps of the operation have remained practically unchanged, modifications have mainly concerned the methods of creating controlled pulmonary blood flow. In the classic Norwood procedure, a modified Blalock-Taussig shunt provides pulmonary blood flow by creating an anastomosis between the brachiocephalic or subclavian artery and the pulmonary artery (usually the right one) using a synthetic vascular graft made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). This shunt provides a continuous, direct blood flow from the systemic circulation to the pulmonary circulation during both systole and diastole. The Blalock-Taussig shunt may lead to the "coronary steal" phenomenon because diastolic pressure in the systemic circulation decreases (70–80% of coronary blood flow occurs during diastole; therefore, coronary steal may play an important role as a cause of mortality between stage I and stage II surgeries) [5,10,67].

An alternative to the Blalock-Taussig shunt is a shunt connecting the right ventricle to the pulmonary artery bifurcation. Although this type of shunt was initially described by Norwood and colleagues in 1981 [113], the technique was popularized and modified by Sano in the early 2000s (this shunt is now frequently referred to as the Sano shunt or Sano modification) [22,114]. This shunt is characterized by systolic-only flow and, consequently, there is no coronary steal. The disadvantage is the need for ventriculotomy, with a potential risk of single-ventricle dysfunction and a long-term risk of arrhythmias. Currently, the choice of shunt remains at the discretion of the surgeon [5,10,67,158].

Hybrid stage I was developed as a less invasive approach to palliative care for newborns with HLHS (allowing the postponement of major open-chest surgery at least until the end of the neonatal period). Gibbs et al. in 1993 reported the first successful single-stage stenting of the patent ductus arteriosus combined with bilateral pulmonary artery banding and balloon atrial septostomy as an alternative to the primary Norwood intervention [115]. This technique has proven viable in a number of subsequent publications and has even become the "standard" first-stage palliative surgical correction for HLHS [25-27,97,100,116]. Currently, percutaneous balloon atrial septostomy is typically deferred until the patient's discharge following the hybrid stage I palliation [100,116]. Regardless of the modification, this technique requires achieving the same three goals originally proposed for the Norwood operation: adequate systemic blood flow (via patent ductus arteriosus stenting), regulation of pulmonary blood flow (bilateral pulmonary artery banding), and unobstructed pulmonary venous outflow (balloon atrial septostomy). In modern practice, stage II should consist of the Norwood-BCPA procedure performed 3–5 months after the prior hybrid intervention [10,12,23-25, 64-67,96-100,116]. The "Achilles' heel" of this modified stage II is the high incidence of delayed left pulmonary artery stenosis.

A minimally invasive approach to palliative care for newborns with HLHS can also be performed without hybrid techniques, using only bilateral pulmonary artery banding as the first stage while maintaining ductal patency via prolonged prostaglandin infusion (from several weeks to two months), followed by a second-stage Norwood-Blalock, Norwood-Sano, or direct Norwood procedure with a cavopulmonary anastomosis. This technique is best suited for high-risk or critically ill patients [26,47-48,118-124,195-196].

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo staged surgical treatment establishing single-ventricle hemodynamics, consisting of three stages: 1) Norwood procedure; 2) Glenn anastomosis; 3) Fontan procedure [18-22,48,64-67,71,85-86,114].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo the Norwood-Sano or Norwood-Blalock procedure as the first stage of surgical treatment within the first 1 week of life [18-22,64-67,71,85-86,116-117].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: performing surgical intervention at a later date is associated with a significant increase in postoperative mortality and the rate of postoperative complications.

  • Patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo diagnostic transvenous cardiac catheterization with pulmonary artery pressure measurement prior to the second stage of surgical treatment [18-22, 64-66,71,85-87,116-117].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: if the systolic pulmonary artery pressure drops below 25 mmHg or the mean pulmonary artery pressure drops below 15 mmHg, a decision is made to perform the second stage of surgical correction for HLHS.

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo a bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis at the age of 2–10 months as the second stage of surgical treatment [18-22, 64-67,71,85-87,92,116-124].

LeveL of Evidence (LoE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C

Comments: the age for performing the second stage is individual for each child and depends on when pulmonary vascular resistance normalizes in the given patient.

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo the Fontan procedure at the age of 18–36 months as the third stage of surgical treatment [18-22,48,64-67,71,88-91,122-124].

LeveL of Evidence (LoE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C

  • In all patients with HLHS, the Fontan procedure is recommended to be performed using the extracardiac conduit modification [48,67,88-91,93-95,122].

LeveL of Evidence (LoE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C

  • Performing hybrid stage I hemodynamic correction prior to the Norwood operation as the initial surgical treatment is recommended for patients with HLHS in the following cases: 1) admission to the hospital in extremely critical condition, 2) admission at an age older than 1 week of life, or 3) low birth weight patients [5,7,10,12,23-25,64-67,96-100].

LeveL of Evidence (LoE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C

Comments: performing the hybrid first stage is also preferred for patients with a complicated infectious and/or neurological history, or severe comorbid somatic pathology. Low body weight <2.5 kg is also an independent risk factor for high mortality. However, it is noted that survival in low-birth-weight patients after hybrid intervention currently remains higher compared to the Norwood procedure  [119,121,169-173].

  • Following hybrid stage I hemodynamic correction, all patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo either the Norwood-bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis, Norwood-Sano, or Norwood-Blalock procedure at the age of 3–5 months as the second stage of surgical treatment [5,7,19-22,64-67,96-100,117-119].

LeveL of Evidence (LoE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C

Comments: the decision regarding the type of surgery is made based on the analysis of preoperative examination results and the clinical experience of the center.

  • As an alternative to the hybrid first stage, it is recommended to consider performing bilateral pulmonary artery banding with a prolonged infusion of C01EA prostaglandins to maintain ductal patency [26,47-48,118-124].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: this technique is best suited for high-risk patients (with low birth weight, significant tricuspid regurgitation, concomitant cardiac or extracardiac pathology, etc.) or critically ill patients. That is, when the need to delay the Norwood procedure arises for only a relatively short period of time (usually just the neonatal period). Such patients remain in the hospital until the second stage of hemodynamic correction is performed. Continuing continuous prostaglandin infusion for more than 2 months is extremely undesirable, as it leads to a sharp increase in the risk of fatal complications (vasoplegia, etc.). Therefore, if it is necessary to delay the Norwood surgical intervention for a longer period of time, delayed patent ductus arteriosus stenting must be performed to discontinue the prostaglandin infusion (transitioning to a hybrid stage I)  [26,47-48,118-124].

3.3 Interventional radiology treatment

  • Balloon atrioseptostomy is not recommended in preoperative patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) who have a non-restrictive atrial septal defect [5,10,25-27,81-84].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

  • All patients with HLHS who have a pressure gradient across the atrial communication greater than 10 mm Hg and pronounced metabolic disorders are recommended to undergo balloon atrioseptostomy to stabilize their condition [46,47,81-84].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: in cases of restrictive atrial septum, primary intervention may involve a Norwood hemodynamic correction or a hybrid stage I with atrioseptostomy. If an isolated atrioseptostomy is performed, it is optimal to postpone the first stage of single-ventricle HLHS correction for several days after this procedure. This tactic is driven by the need to reduce vascular resistance in the pulmonary circulation system. In patients with severe restriction at the atrial communication or an intact atrial septum, emergency intervention must be performed within the first 3 hours of life to decompress the left atrium [82,84].

  • Following a hybrid stage I hemodynamic correction, all patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo balloon atrioseptostomy of the patent foramen ovale (regardless of its size) prior to hospital discharge [25-27,81-84].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: identical tactics should be followed if separate pulmonary artery banding with prolonged prostaglandin infusion was previously performed, but patent ductus arteriosus stenting was ultimately performed as the next stage instead of the Norwood procedure.

  • In the interstage period, if complications occur (such as pulmonary artery stenoses, obstruction at the level of the descending aorta or the stented ductus, etc.), it is recommended to use percutaneous endovascular techniques [67,116-117].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: these techniques also include the creation of an atrial septal defect with stenting when balloon atrioseptostomy is ineffective, stenting of pulmonary artery stenoses, or repeat stenting of the patent ductus arteriosus. Regarding neo-aortic obstruction, open surgical techniques are preferred by the majority of surgeons.

3.4 Other treatment

  • Patients with HLHS and severe right ventricular dysfunction and/or severe tricuspid regurgitation are recommended to undergo heart transplantation as the only alternative to staged correction [28-31,48,67,106,117,122].

Level of Evidence 4, Grade of Recommendation B

Comments: if waiting for a donor heart is necessary, a hybrid stage I or the use of mechanical hemodynamic support devices (such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or other artificial circulatory support systems) can serve as an interim treatment stage.

  • In patients with forms of HLHS with special anatomy (a combination of aortic valve atresia, in the absence of severe mitral valve pathology with a large ventricular septal defect, and normal intrauterine development of the left ventricular cavity—indexed EDV greater than 20 mL/m2) or the presence of hypoplastic left heart syndrome variants, it is recommended to perform procedures aimed at preserving biventricular hemodynamics [32-37,125].

LeveL of Evidence (LoE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C

Comments: since biventricular correction is only possible in certain cases and is often risky, the choice of surgical treatment tactics is based on a thorough analysis of preoperative echocardiography data, supplemented by CT or MRI scans if necessary. The morphometric results obtained for each patient, combined with the morphological features of the mitral and aortic valves, the left ventricle, and hemodynamic characteristics, determine the final surgical strategy.

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

  • Patients with HLHS following any stage of surgical correction are recommended to avoid traction loads on the upper extremities for the subsequent 4–6 months of life [10,69,129].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo rehabilitation measures lasting at least 6 weeks after each stage of surgical treatment [62,67,70-71,116-117,195-196].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: rehabilitation can in most cases be carried out at home, provided there is periodic monitoring of the patient's condition by the local pediatrician (once every 2-3 weeks). The optimal duration of the rehabilitation period is 10-12 weeks. If rehabilitation is ineffective, requires the selection of an individual program, or frequent monitoring by a subspecialist, the question of sending the patient to a specialized rehabilitation center should be considered.

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to have an individual optimal physical activity regimen selected during the outpatient follow-up stage after each stage of surgical treatment [10,62,67,71,116,129-130].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo follow-up care by a pediatric cardiologist (dispensary appointment/examination/consultation by a pediatric cardiologist experienced in congenital heart disease) after each stage of hemodynamic correction to detect hemodynamic disturbances that may require surgical treatment [5,7,10,12,25-31,48,67,81-84,96-100,106,117,122-124].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: the most common pathologies requiring additional correction include: development of systemic atrioventricular (tricuspid) valve regurgitation, neo-aortic valve regurgitation, development of ascending aorta and/or aortic arch obstruction following previous reconstruction, development of pulmonary artery stenoses, and the need for conduit replacement, among others. When these complications develop, the feasibility of correcting the developed pathology must be assessed. If reconstructive interventions are possible, they are the method of choice; however, if reconstructive interventions are not feasible, heart transplantation remains the only possible solution.

It is recommended to conduct educational schools for all parents of children with HLHS to enable additional home monitoring of the child's condition during the interstage period [116-117].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

Comments: parents play an important role in adhering to medical recommendations (ensuring faster rehabilitation of children) and identifying early signs of clinical deterioration in children with HLHS. Therefore, cardiovascular medications must be safe, understandable, and easy to administer. Furthermore, parents must be taught to monitor the rate and character of breathing during the child's sleep, oral feeding volume, and body weight (reporting any detected deviations to the supervising physician).

  • All patients with HLHS between stages of surgical treatment are recommended to have a dispensary appointment (examination, consultation) with the local general pediatrician at their place of residence (at least once every 2 weeks) and a dispensary appointment (examination, consultation) with a pediatric cardiologist (at least once every 7 days during the first 2 months, and at least once a month thereafter) [5,7,10,12,19-21,35,42,53,58,62,63,67,116,131-138,145].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: such a high frequency of outpatient check-ups by physicians is necessary for the timely detection of any hemodynamic imbalance at an early stage before a critical situation develops, as well as for the timely discovery of extracardiac complications or comorbidities that may affect the final treatment outcome. When hemodynamic or other issues are detected early, diagnostic and, if necessary, interventional procedures aimed at halting the progression of the identified disorders should be actively pursued.

  • Patients with HLHS after each stage of surgical treatment are recommended to undergo evaluation at a specialized cardiosurgical hospital at least once every 3 months during the inter-stage period and throughout the first year after the Fontan procedure [5,7,10,67,87-96,101,106,116-117].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

  • One year after the Fontan procedure, all patients with HLHS are recommended to be followed up at a specialized hospital at least once a year (optimally twice a year) [5,10,62,67,87-96,101,106,116-117,145].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

  • All patients with HLHS at each evaluation in a specialized hospital are recommended to undergo echocardiography with monitoring of the contractile function of the single functional ventricle of the heart, monitoring of neoaortic and tricuspid valve regurgitation, as well as assessment of hemodynamics in the neoaorta (exclusion of systemic blood flow obstruction), dimensions of the atrial communication, and the character of blood flow in the pulmonary arteries (exclusion of pulmonary blood flow obstruction) [5,7,10,12,25-31,48,67,81-84,96-100,106,117,122-124].

Level of Evidence (LE) 4, Grade of Recommendation (GR) C

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to have dispensary follow-up by a neurologist at their place of residence [40-41,67,117,126-129,137-138,145].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Comments: Rogers et al. published data showing that 73% of children with HLHS presented with microcephaly 38 months after surgical correction, and 45% maintained a weight deficit. Different degrees of mental retardation were observed in 64% of children, and significant functional disability was noted in 73% [38]. According to Kern et al., the mean IQ score (in children during the long-term period with HLHS) was 88, with 8.3% of patients exhibiting significant mental retardation [39]. Later studies have shown that children with HLHS lag behind in psychoemotional (IQ = 89) and physical development, but the differences are not significant compared to children with other congenital heart defects [40-41].

  • All patients with HLHS after each stage of surgical correction are recommended to have individualized therapy tailored to correct circulatory failure and reduce vascular resistance in the lesser circulation [5,7,65,67,70,80,86-88,101,104-108,116-117,].

Level of Evidence (LoE) 3, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) C

Comments: therapy selection is carried out in the cardiosurgical hospital before discharge of the patient. If necessary, therapy correction is performed by the cardiologist at the patient's place of residence.

6. Organization of Medical Care

Stages of medical care and indications for hospitalization:

  1. clarification of the diagnosis;

  2. in case of confirmation of the diagnosis of HLHS (it should be understood that the defect is always critical), it is necessary to urgently transfer the child to the intensive care unit and initiate conservative therapy (administration of C01EA prostaglandins infusion, if necessary C01D vasodilators for heart diseases and C01C cardiotonic agents excluding cardiac glycosides, in the absence of effect – transfer to mechanical ventilation) and arrange emergency transfer to a cardiosurgical hospital for surgical care immediately after stabilization of the clinical condition;

  3. if the patient's condition is stable against the background of C01EA prostaglandins infusion, it is still necessary to arrange the transfer of the patient to a cardiosurgical hospital as soon as possible, since decompensation of the condition may develop at any time (meanwhile, the patient must also be in the intensive care unit);

  4. confirmed HLHS is always an absolute indication for cardiosurgical staged palliative treatment at 1-2 weeks of age, with preference for the Norwood procedure as the first stage if the patient's condition permits. In the presence of comorbid pathology or extreme severity of the condition, preference for the first stage may be given to the hybrid first stage of hemodynamic correction or bilateral pulmonary artery banding combined with prolonged infusion of C01EA prostaglandins. Subsequently, all patients undergo the following stages of surgical correction according to an individualized approach until the Fontan procedure is performed, which is the final stage of palliative correction of HLHS.

Basics of conservative therapy

  • a key role in preoperative conservative therapy is assigned to intravenous infusion (C01EA) of prostaglandins maintaining ductus arteriosus patency;

  • it is important to adhere to the following algorithm when stabilizing the patient's condition (in case of progressive deterioration of the patient's condition): first, rule out excessive pulmonary blood flow; second, rule out systemic hypovolemia; third, administration of nitroferricyanide derivatives or peripheral antiadrenergic agents infusion is recommended under blood pressure monitoring. Next, if necessary, cardiotonic agents excluding cardiac glycosides are prescribed (drugs with pronounced vasopressor effects should be avoided whenever possible);

  • at saturation > 90% combined with lactacidemia, arterial hypotension, and oliguria, tracheal intubation and transfer to mechanical ventilation are recommended. Mechanical ventilation is performed with high positive end-expiratory pressure parameters and a fraction of inspired oxygen of 21%. In other cases, without extreme necessity, one should try to avoid transferring the patient to mechanical ventilation, as unjustified transfer may instead worsen the patient's condition;

  • criteria for the effectiveness of preoperative conservative therapy are the normalization of acid-base balance, regression of serum lactate levels, a tendency towards normalization of diuresis and reduction of plasma residual nitrogen levels, and arterial blood oxygenation levels within the range of 75-90%.

Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization:

  • balanced systemic and pulmonary blood flows;

  • no need for continued respiratory support and intravenous infusion therapy;

  • absence of signs of heart failure;

  • sinus heart rhythm.

7. Additional Information

  • All patients with HLHS are recommended to undergo neurosonography and/or brain CT scan and a repeat consultation (examination) by a neurologist before each stage of HLHS surgical correction in order to detect pathological changes that affect the outcome of surgical correction and may influence the choice of anesthetic and perfusion management [5,7,10, 40-41,67,117,126-129,145].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

  • All patients with HLHS upon initial admission to a specialized hospital before the first stage of surgical correction are recommended to undergo assessment of liver and kidney functional state. In the presence of severe renal and hepatic failure, therapy aimed at normalizing their function is carried out. After normalization of the parameters, the question of the patient's readiness for surgery is addressed [5,10,48,67,70,80,86-88,101,104-108,116].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

  • Inpatient treatment for all patients with HLHS is recommended to be carried out in medical institutions with extensive experience in performing these surgeries and corresponding experience in postoperative patient management. Clinics with a high volume of surgeries in patients with HLHS tend to have lower mortality rates [5,7,10,80,86,88,104].

Level of trustworthiness of evidence (LTE) 5, Level of recommendation (LR) C

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

№

Quality criteria

Evaluation of compliance

Diagnosis stage

1

Examination performed, thorough history and complaints taken

Yes/No

2

Initial consultation (examination) by a cardiologist / initial consultation (examination) by a pediatric cardiologist / initial consultation (examination) by a cardiovascular surgeon performed

Yes/No

3

Auscultation for heart and pericardial pathology performed

Yes/No

4

Blood pressure measurement performed

Yes/No

5

Peristalsis assessed

Yes/No

6

Acid-base status and blood gas analysis performed

Yes/No

7

Complete blood count performed

Yes/No

8

Determination of main ABO blood groups and D antigen of the Rhesus system (Rh factor) performed

Yes/No

9

Coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis study) performed

Yes/No

10

General biochemical blood test performed

Yes/No

11

Transthoracic echocardiography performed

Yes/No

12

Angiocardiography not performed

Yes/No

13

In cases where echocardiography data are insufficient for verification of the diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging of the heart and great vessels performed

Yes/No

14

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the heart performed if echocardiography is insufficient to verify the diagnosis

Yes/No

15

Targeted chest X-ray performed

Yes/No

16

Electrocardiogram recording performed

(decoding, description, and interpretation of electrocardiographic data)

Yes/No

17

Neurosonography performed

Yes/No

Conservative treatment stage

1

Transfer to the intensive care unit for vital function monitoring and stabilization of patients with a prenatally established diagnosis of HLHS performed immediately after delivery

Yes/No

2

After condition stabilization in the neonatal intensive care unit, transfer to the nearest cardiosurgical hospital performed

Yes/No

3

Infusion of C01EA prostaglandins initiated in a newborn with hypoplastic left heart syndrome

Yes/No

4

No additional oxygen therapy was prescribed while maintaining oxygen saturation levels within 75–85%

Yes/No

5

Tracheal intubation was performed and mechanical ventilation was initiated (fraction of inspired oxygen 21%) at a saturation > 90% combined with lactic acidosis, arterial hypotension, and oliguria

Yes/No

6

Upon a decline in the function of the right, functionally single ventricle (heart failure), conservative management was performed in accordance with the algorithm

Yes/No

7

Systemic antibacterial drugs were prescribed in the maternity hospital in the presence of infection risk factors

Yes/No

8

In the case of a restrictive interatrial communication, muscle relaxants were administered in calculated doses, the patient underwent tracheal intubation, additional oxygen therapy was initiated, and the doses of C01EA prostaglandins were increased

Yes/No

Surgical Treatment Stage

1

Surgical correction using the Norwood–Sano or Norwood–Blalock procedure was performed within the first week of life as the first stage of surgical treatment

Yes/No

2

A hybrid stage I hemodynamic correction was performed prior to the Norwood operation as the first stage of surgical treatment upon admission of the patient in extremely severe condition or admission at an age older than 1 week of life

Yes/No

3

Upon admission of the patient in extremely severe condition, a staged pulmonary artery banding with continuous infusion of C01EA prostaglandins prior to the Norwood operation was performed as the first stage of surgical treatment

Yes/No

4

A Norwood operation with bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis, or Norwood–Sano or Norwood–Blalock procedure, was performed at the age of 3–5 months in cases where a hybrid stage I hemodynamic correction had been previously performed

Yes/No

5

A bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis was performed at the child's age of 2–10 months as the next stage following a previously performed Norwood-Sano or Norwood-Blalock procedure

Yes/No

6

As a final stage, the Fontan procedure was performed at the age of 18–36 months.

Yes/No

7

In the preoperative period, balloon atrioseptostomy was not performed in patients with HLHS and a non-restrictive atrial septal defect

Yes/No

8

All patients with HLHS with a pressure gradient across the interatrial communication greater than 10 mm Hg underwent balloon atrioseptostomy

Yes/No

9

Following the hybrid stage I hemodynamic correction, all patients with HLHS underwent balloon atrioseptostomy prior to hospital discharge

Yes/No

10

Patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome underwent procedures aimed at preserving biventricular circulation

Yes/No

Postoperative Monitoring Stage

1

All patients with HLHS following each stage of hemodynamic

correction undergo follow-up care by a pediatric cardiologist experienced in congenital heart disease

Yes/No

2

Educational seminars were conducted for all parents of children with HLHS

Yes/No

3

Follow-up appointments (examination, consultation) by a district pediatrician (at least once every 2 weeks) and follow-up appointments (examination, consultation) by a pediatric cardiologist were conducted during the first 2 months at least once every 7 days, and thereafter at least once a month

Yes/No

4

An examination in a specialized inpatient facility was performed once every 3 months during the interstage period and throughout the first year following the Fontan procedure

Yes/No

5

Echocardiography was performed at each evaluation in a specialized inpatient facility

Yes/No

6

Following each stage of correction, individualized therapy was selected aimed at managing circulatory failure and reducing pulmonary vascular resistance, and adherence to the prescribed therapy was monitored

Yes/No

7

Patients with HLHS following each stage of surgical treatment (at the outpatient monitoring stage) were prescribed an individualized physical activity regimen

Yes/No

8

All patients with HLHS following the third stage of surgical treatment completed quality-of-life questionnaires to develop personalized psychological rehabilitation plans

Yes/No

9

All patients with HLHS undergo follow-up care by a neurologist at their place of residence

Yes/No

References

Show references
  1. Nicholls D.G., Ungerleider R.M., Spevak P.J. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. In: Nicholls D.G., Ungerleider R.M. et al. (eds). Critical Heart Disease in Infants and Children, 2nd ed. Mosby, Philadelphia, 2006, pp 823-844.

  2. Lev M. Pathologic anatomy and interrelationship of hypoplasia of the aortic tract complexes. Lab Invest 1952;1:61–70.

  3. Tchervenkov C.I., Jacobs J.P., Weinberg P.M., et al. The nomenclature, definition and classification of hypoplastic left heart syndrome.Cardiol Young 2006;16:339–68.

  4. Noonan J.A., Nadas A.S. The hypoplastic left heart syndrome. An analysis of 101 cases. Pediatr Clin North Am 1958; 5: 1029–1056.

  5. Kirklin J.W., Barratt-Boyes B.G. Aortic atresia and other forms of hypoplastic left heart physiology. In: Kirklin J.W., Barratt-Boyes B.G. (eds). Cardiac Surgery. Fourth edition, 2013, pp 1780–1809.

  6. Mahowald JM, Lucas RV Jr, Edwards JE. Aortic valvular atresia. Associated cardiovascular anomalies. Pediatr Cardiol 1982;2:99.

  7. Jonas R.A. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. In: Jonas R.A. (eds). Comprehensive Surgical Management of Congenital Heart Disease. Hodder Arnold, London, pp.341-354

  8. Izukawa T, Mullholland C, Rowe RD et al. Structural heart disease in newborn, changing profile: comparison of 1975 with 1965. Arch Dis Child 1979; 54:281-285.

  9. Scott D.J., Rigby M.L., Miller G.AH, Shinebourne E.A. The presentation of symptomatic heart disease in infancy based on 10 years’ experience (1973-1982): implications for the provision of service. BrHeartJ 1984, 52:248-257.

  10. Bokeria L.A., Shatalov K.V. Pediatric cardiac surgery: a guide for physicians. Moscow: Bakulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery 2016; pp. 684-700.

  11. Hunter LE, Simpson JM. Prenatal screening for structural congenital heart disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11(6):323- 34.

  12. Anderson R.H., Baker E.J., et al.  Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. In: Anderson R.H. et al. (eds).  Paediatric cardiology Anderson, 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone,  Philadelphia, 2010, pp. 625-645.

  13. Mery C.M., Nieto R.M., De León L.E., Morris S.A. et al. The Role of Echocardiography and Intracardiac Exploration in the Evaluation of Candidacy for Biventricular Repair in Patients With Borderline Left Heart Structures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Mar;103(3):853-861.

  14. McElhinney D.B., Vogel M., Benson C.B., Marshall A.C. et al. Assessment of left ventricular endocardial fibroelastosis in fetuses with aortic stenosis and evolving hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2010 Dec 15;106(12):1792-7.

  15. Mahle WT, Weinberg PM, Rychik J. Can echocardiography predict the presence or absence of endocardial fibroelastosis in infants <1 year of age with left ventricular outflow obstruction? Am J Cardiol 1998;82(1):122–4.

  16. Kim HJ, Goo HW, Park SH, Yun TJ.  Left ventricle volume measured by cardiac CT in an infant with a small left ventricle: a new and accurate method in determining uni- or biventricular repair. Pediatr Radiol. 2013 Jan;43(2):243-6

  17. Dillman J.R., Dorfman A.L., Attili A.K., Agarwal P.P. et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of hypoplastic left heart syndrome in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2010 Mar;40(3):261-74.Theilen U., Shekerdemian L. The intensive care of infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:P97–102.

  18. Theilen U., Shekerdemian L. The intensive care of infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:P97–102.

  19. Feinstein J.A., Benson D.W., Dubin A.M., Cohen M.S. et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: current considerations and expectations. J Am Coll. Cardiol. 2012 Jan 3;59(1 Suppl):S1-42.

  20. Nakano T., Kado H., Tatewaki H., Hinokiyama K. et al. Surgical strategy and the results for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Kyobu Geka. 2014 Apr;67(4):299-304.

  21. Maeda Y., Yamagishi M., Miyazaki T., Yamamoto Y. et al. The treatment strategy for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Kyobu Geka. 2014 Apr;67(4):305-9.

  22. Sano S, Ishino K, Kawada M, et al. Right ventriclepulmonary artery shunt in first-stage palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(2):504-9.

  23. Bacha EA, Daves S, Hardin J, et al. Single-ventricle palliation for high-risk neonates: the emergence of an alternative hybrid stage I strategy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(1):163-171.

  24. Caldarone CA, Benson L, Holtby H, Li J, Redington AN, Van Arsdell GS. Initial experience with hybrid palliation for neonates with single-ventricle physiology. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(4):1294-300.

  25. Galantowicz M, Cheatham JP, Phillips A, et al. Hybrid approach for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: intermediate results after the learning curve. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(6):2063-70.

  26. Galantowicz M, Cheatham JP. Lessons learned from the development of a new hybrid strategy for the management of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol 2005;26:190 –9. Erratum in: Pediatr Cardiol 2005; 26:307.

  27. Hill SL, Galantowicz M, Cheatham JP. Emerging strategies in the treatment of hlhs: combined transcatheter & surgical techniques. Pediatr Cardiol Today 2003; 1:1– 4.

  28. Almond CD, Thiagarajan RR, Piercey GE, et al. Waiting list mortality among children listed for heart transplantation in the United States. Circulation 2009; 119:717–27.

  29. Boucek RJ, Chrisant M. Cardiac transplantation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Cardiol Young 2004; 14:83–7.

  30. Kirk R, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, et al. The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirteenth official pediatric heart transplantation report—2010. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010; 29:1119 –28.

  31. Alsoufi B, Deshpande S, McCracken C, Kogon B, Vincent R, Mahle W, Kanter K. Results of heart transplantation following failed staged palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome and related single ventricle anomalies. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Nov;48(5):792-8.

  32. Yasui H, Kado H, Nakano E, et al. Primary repair of interrupted aortic arch and severe aortic stenosis in    neonates. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987; 93:539–45.

  33. Tchervenkov CI, Tahta Sa, Jutras LC, Béland MJ. Biventricular Repair in Neonates with Hypoplastic Left Heart Complex. Ann Thorac Surg 1998; 66;1350-7.

  34. Bokeria L.A., Podzolkov V.P., Baryshnikova I.Yu., Simogaeva E.B., Berishvili D.O. Biventricular reconstruction after hybrid stage I in left heart obstructive lesions. Pediatric Diseases of Heart and Vessels, 2013; 4: 32-36.

  35. Kalashnikov S.V., Berishvili D.O. Influence of left heart hypoplasia on the feasibility of biventricular correction of complex congenital heart defects in the neonatal period. Pediatric Diseases of Heart and Vessels. 2015; (4): 47-57.

  36. Avitabile CM, Mercer-Rosa L, Ravishankar C, Rome JJ et. al. Experience with biventricular intervention for neonates with mitral valve abnormalities in the setting of critical left-side heart obstruction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Mar;99(3):877-83.

  37. Kanter KR, Kirshbom PM, Kogon BE; Biventricular repair with the Yasui operation (Norwood/Rastelli) for systemic outflow tract obstruction with two adequate ventricles; Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Jun;93(6).

  38. Rogers BT, Msall ME, Buck GM, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Pediatr 1995;126:496-8.

  39. Kern JH, Hinton VJ, Nereo NE, Hayes CJ, Gersony WM. Early developmental outcome after the Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatrics 1998;102:1148-52.

  40. Martin BJ, De Villiers JI, Joffe AR, Bond GY, Acton BV et. al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome is not associated with worse clinical or neurodevelopmental outcomes than other cardiac pathologies after the Norwood-Sano operation. Pediatr Cardiol. 2017 Jun;38(5):922-931.

  41. Knirsch W, Liamlahi R, Dave H, Kretschmar O, Latal B. Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Children with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome at One and Four Years of Age Comparing Hybrid and Norwood Procedure. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Dec 20;22(6):375-377.

  42. Raat H, Bonsel GJ, Essink-Bot ML, Landgraf JM, Gemke RJ. Reliability and validity of comprehensive health status measures in children: The Child Health Questionnaire in relation to the Health Utilities Index. J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55:67-76.

  43. Garcia RU, Natarajan G, Walters HL, Delius RE, Aggarwal S. Acute kidney injury following first-stage palliation in hypoplastic left heart syndrome: hybrid versus Norwood palliation. Cardiol Young. 2018 Feb;28(2):261-268.

  44. Goldstein BH, Goldstein SL, Devarajan P, Zafar F et al. First-stage palliation strategy for univentricular heart disease may impact risk for acute kidney injury.Cardiol Young. 2018 Jan;28(1):93-100.

  45. Maller VV, Cohen HL. Neurosonography: Assessing the Premature Infant. Pediatr Radiol. 2017 Aug;47(9):1031-1045.

  46. Barker GM, Forbess JM, Guleserian KJ, Nugent AW. Optimization of preoperative status in hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact atrial septum by left atrial decompression and bilateral pulmonary artery bands.Pediatr Cardiol. 2014 Mar;35(3):479-84.

  47. Gomide M, Furci B, Mimic B, Brown KL et al. Rapid 2-stage Norwood I for high-risk hypoplastic left heart syndrome and variants.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1146-51; discussion 1151-2.

  48. Mitani Y, Takabayashi S, Sawada H, Ohashi H, Hayakawa H, Ikeyama Y et al. Fate of the "opened" arterial duct: Lessons learned from bilateral pulmonary artery banding for hypoplastic left heart.

  49. Stieh J, Fischer G, Scheewe J, Uebing A, Dütschke P et al. Impact of preoperative treatment strategies on the early perioperative outcome in neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 May;131(5):1122-1129.e2.

  50. Hoffman J.I., Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol (2002) 39:1890–1900.

  51. Grossfeld P, Ye M, Harvey R. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: new genetic insights. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:1072-4.

  52. Sharland GK, Chita SK, Fagg NL, Anderson RH, Tynan M, Cook AC, et al. Left ventricular dysfunction in the fetus: relation to aortic valve anomalies and endocardial fibroelastosis. Br Heart J 1991;66:419.

  53. Sedmera, D.; Cook, A.C.; Shirali, G.; McQuinn, T.C. Current issues and perspectives in hypoplasia of the left heart. Cardiol. Young 2005, 15, 56–72.

  54. Krane, M.; Dressen, M.; Santamaria, G.; My, I.; Schneider, C.M.; Dorn, T.; Laue, S.; Mastantuono, E.; Berutti, R.; Rawat, H.; et al. Sequential Defects in Cardiac Lineage Commitment and Maturation Cause

  55. Bardo DM, Frankel DG, Applegate KE, Murphy DJ, Saneto RP. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Radiographics. 2001 May-Jun;21(3):705-17.

  56. Norwood WI. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Cardiol Clin 1989; 7:377–385.

  57. Norwood WI. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Ann Thorac Surg 1991; 52:688–695.

  58. Kritzmire SM, Cossu AE. Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. 2023 Apr 24. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan.

  59. Metcalf MK, Rychik J. Outcomes in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2020 Oct;67(5):945-962.

  60. Rychik J, Rome JJ, Collins MH, et al. The hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact atrial septum: atrial morphology,  pulmonary vascular histopathology and outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999; 34:554–60.

  61. Glatz JA, Tabbutt S, Gaynor JW, et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with atrial level restriction in the era of prenatal diagnosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84: 1633–8.

  62. Saxena A, Relan J, Agarwal R, Awasthy N, Azad S, Chakrabarty M. et all. Indian guidelines for indications and timing of intervention for common congenital heart diseases: Revised and updated consensus statement of the Working group on management of congenital heart diseases. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2019 Sep-Dec;12(3):254-286.

  63. DaCruz EM, Ivy D, Jaggers J Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology, Cardiac Surgery and Intensive Care. London, Springer London, 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-4619-3.

  64. Feinstein JA, Benson DW, Dubin AM, Cohen MS, Maxey DM et al. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: current considerations and expectations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 3;59(1 Suppl):S1-42. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jan 31;59(5):544.

  65. Roeleveld PP, Axelrod DM, Klugman D, Jones MB, Chanani NK, Rossano JW, Costello JM. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: from fetus to Fontan. Cardiol Young. 2018 Nov;28(11):1275-1288.

  66. Liu MY, Zielonka B, Snarr BS, et al. Longitudinal assessment of outcome from prenatal diagnosis through fontan operation for over 500 fetuses with single ventricle-type congenital heart disease: the philadelphia fetus-to-fontan cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e009145.

  67. Ohye RG, Schranz D, D’Udekem Y. Current therapy for hypoplastic left heart syndrome and related single ventricle lesions. Circulation 2016; 134: 1265–1279.

  68. Morris SA, Ethen MK, Penny DJ, et al. Prenatal diagnosis, birth location, surgical center, and neonatal mortality in infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation 2014; 129: 285–292.

  69. Share DA, Campbell DA, Birkmeyer N, Prager RL, Gurm HS, Moscucci M, Udow-Phillips M, Birkmeyer JD. How a regional collaborative of hospitals and physicians in Michigan cut costs and improved the quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2011; 30:636–645.

  70. Mahle, WT.; Nicolson, S.; Shekerdemian, LS.; Gaies, MG.; Witte, MK.; Lee, EK.; Goldsworthy, M.; Stark, P.; Burns, KM.; Scheurer, MA.; Cooper, DS.; Thiagarajan, R.; Sivarajan, B.; Hollenbeck-Pringle, D.; Colan, S. American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2015. Orlando, Florida: Nov 10. 2015 Utilizing a Collaborative Learning Model to Decrease Length of Postoperative Ventilation Following Infant Heart Surgery.

  71. Pasquali SK, Ohye RG, Lu M, Kaltman J, Caldarone CA, Pizarro C, Dunbar-Masterson C, Gaynor JW, Jacobs JP, Kaza AK, Newburger J, Rhodes JF, Scheurer M, Silver E, Sleeper LA, Tabbutt S, Tweddell J, Uzark K, Wells W, Mahle WT, Pearson GD, for the Pediatric Heart Network Investigators. Variation in perioperative care across centers for infants undergoing the Norwood procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144:915–921.

  72. Graham EM, Bradley SM, Atz AM. Preoperative management of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2005 May;6(5):687-93.

  73. abbutt S, Ramamoorthy C, Montenegro LM, et al. Impact of inspired gas mixtures on preoperative infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome during controlled ventilation. Circulation 2001;104: I-159–64.  

  74. Gatelli IF, Vitelli O, Chiesa G, De Rienzo F, Martinelli S. Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitoring in Newborn with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. Am J Perinatol. 2020 Sep;37(S 02):S54-S56. 

  75. ElHassan NO, Tang X, Gossett J, Zakaria D, Ross A, Kona SK, Prodhan P. Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Infants with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Following Stage 1 Palliation or Heart Transplant. Pediatr Cardiol. 2018 Apr;39(4):774-785.

  76. Javed R, Cetta F, Said SM, Olson TM, O"Leary PW, Qureshi MY. Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: An Overview for Primary Care Providers. Pediatr Rev. 2019 Jul;40(7):344-353.

  77. Tran NN, Tran M, Lemus RE, Woon J, Lopez J, Dang R, Votava-Smith JK. Preoperative Care of Neonates With Congenital Heart Disease. Neonatal Netw. 2022 Jul 1;41(4):200-210.

  78. Johnson B, Mussatto K, Uhing M, Zimmerman H, Tweddell J, Ghanayem N. Variability in the preoperative management of infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol 2008;29: 515–20.

  79. Czerżyńska M, Sacharczuk J, Mleczko M, Skalski JH, Mroczek T. The effect of prenatal diagnosis on antibiotic therapy in neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Antibiotics in prenatally diagnosed patients with HLHS. Folia Med Cracov. 2019;59(2):35-44.

  80. Webb G.D., Smallhorn J.F., Th errien J., Redington A.N.: Congenital heart disease. In: Bonow R.O., Mann D.L., Zipes D.P., Libby P., eds. Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2011: chap. 65.

  81. Fukushima Y, Baba K, Kondo M, Kurita Y, Eitoku T, Shigemitsu Y, Hirai K, Tsukahara H, Iwasaki T, Kasahara S, Kotani Y, Otsuki S. Balloon atrial septostomy in hypoplastic left heart syndrome with restrictive atrial septum. Pediatr Int. 2019 Apr;61(4):339-344. 

  82. Vlahos AP, Lock JE, McElhinney DB, van der Velde ME. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact or highly restrictive atrial septum: outcome after neonatal transcatheter atrial septostomy. Circulation. 2004 May 18;109(19):2326-30. 

  83. Gossett JG, Rocchini AP, Lloyd TR, Graziano JN. Catheter-based decompression of the left atrium in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and restrictive atrial septum is safe and effective. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):619-24. 

  84. Hoque T, Richmond M, Vincent JA, Bacha E, Torres A. Current outcomes of hypoplastic left heart syndrome with restrictive atrial septum: A single-center experience. Pediatr. Cardiol. 2013; 34:1181-9.

  85. Hansen JH, Petko C, Bauer G, Voges I, Kramer H-H, Scheewe J. Fifteen-year single-center experience with the Norwood operation for complex lesions with single-ventricle physiology compared with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012; 144:166–172.

  86. Tabbutt S, Ghanayem N, Ravishankar C, Sleeper LA, Cooper DS, Frank DU, Lu M, Pizarro C, Frommelt P, Goldberg CS, Graham EM, Krawczeski CD, Lai WW, Lewis A, Kirsh JA, Mahony L, Ohye RG, Simsic J, Lodge AJ, Spurrier E, Stylianou M, Laussen P, Investigators PHN. Risk factors for hospital morbidity and mortality after the Norwood procedure: A report from the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144:882–895.

  87. Ghanayem NS, Tweddell JS, Hoffman GM, Mussatto K, Jaquiss RD. Optimal timing of the second stage of palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome facilitated through home monitoring, and the results of early cavopulmonary anastomosis. Cardiol Young. 2006 Feb;16 Suppl 1:61-6.

  88. de Leval MR, Deanfield JE. Four decades of Fontan palliation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010; 7:520–527.

  89. d’Udekem Y, Iyengar AJ, Galati JC, Forsdick V, Weintraub RG, Wheaton GR, Bullock A, Justo RN, Grigg LE, Sholler GF, Hope S, Radford DJ, Gentles TL, Celermajer DS, Winlaw DS. Redefining Expectations of Long-Term Survival After the Fontan Procedure: Twenty-Five Years of Follow-Up From the Entire Population of Australia and New Zealand. Circulation. 2014; 130:S32– S38.

  90. Pundi KN, Johnson JN, Dearani JA, Pundi KN, Li Z, Hinck CA, Dahl SH, Cannon BC, O’Leary PW, Driscoll DJ, Cetta F. 40-Year Follow-Up After the Fontan Operation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015; 66:1700–1710.

  91. Anderson PAW, Sleeper LA, Mahony L, Colan SD, Atz AM, Breitbart RE, Gersony WM, Gallagher D, Geva T, Margossian R, McCrindle BW, Paridon S, Schwartz M, Stylianou M, Williams RV, Clark BJ, Pediatric Heart Network Investigators. Contemporary outcomes after the Fontan procedure: a Pediatric Heart Network multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52:85– 98.

  92. Jaquiss RDB, Ghanayem NS, Hoffman GM, et al. Early cavopul- monary anastomosis in very young infants after the Norwood procedure: impact on oxygenation, resource utilization, and mortality. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:982–9.

  93. Salazar J, Zafar F, Siddiqui K. Fenestration during Fontan palliation: now the exception instead of the rule. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:129–36.

  94. Robbers-Visser D, Miedema M, Nijveld A, et al. Results of staged total cavopulmonary connection for functionally univentricular hearts; comparison of intra-atrial lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;37:934–41.

  95. Fiore AC, Turrentine M, Rodefeld M, et al. Fontan operation: a comparison of lateral tunnel with extracardiac conduit. Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:622–30.

  96. Rai V, Gładki M, Dudyńska M, Skalski J. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome [HLHS]: treatment options in present era. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;35(2):196-202.

  97. Galantowicz M, Yates AR. Improved outcomes with the comprehensive stage 2 procedure after an initial hybrid stage 1. J Thorac and Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 151:424–429.

  98. Yerebakan C, Valeske K, Elmontaser H, Yörüker U, Mueller M, Thul J, Mann V, Latus H, Villanueva A, Hofmann K, Schranz D, Akintuerk H. Hybrid therapy for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: Myth, alternative, or standard? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 151:1112–1123.

  99. Nassar MS, Narayan SA, Nyman A, Salih C, Austin CB, Anderson D, Hussain T. Second stage after initial hybrid palliation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: Arterial or venous shunt? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Aug;150(2):350-7.

  100. Akintuerk H, Michel-Behnke I, Valeske K, et al. Stenting of the arterial duct and banding of the pulmonary arteries: basis for combined Norwood stage I and II repair in hypoplastic left heart. Circulation 2002;105:1099–103.

  101. Guidelines for the Management of Congenital Heart Diseases. Cardiology in the Young (2017), 27(Suppl. 3), S1–S105.

  102. .Vari D, Xiao W, Behere S, Spurrier E, Tsuda T, Baffa JM. Low-dose prostaglandin E1 is safe and effective for critical congenital heart disease: is it time to revisit the dosing guidelines? Cardiol Young. 2021 Jan;31(1):63-70. 

  103. .Yucel IK, Cevik A, Bulut MO, Dedeoğlu R, Demir İH, Erdem A, Celebi A. Efficacy of very low-dose prostaglandin E1 in duct-dependent congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young. 2015 Jan;25(1):56-62.

  104. Khalil M, Jux C, Rueblinger L, Behrje J, Esmaeili A, Schranz D. Acute therapy of newborns with critical congenital heart disease. Transl Pediatr. 2019 Apr;8(2):114-126.

  105. Masarone D, Valente F, Rubino M, Vastarella R, Gravino R., Rea A, et al. Pediatric Heart Failure: A Practical Guide to Diagnosis and Management. Pediatr Neonatol. 2017 Aug;58(4):303-312.

  106. Kantor PF, Lougheed J, Dancea A, McGillion M, Barbosa N, Chan C, et al. Presentation, diagnosis, and medical management of heart failure in children: Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines. Can J Cardiol. 2013 Dec;29(12):1535-52.

  107. Lechner E, Moosbauer W, Pinter M, Mair R, Tulzer G. Use of levosimendan, a new inodilator, for postoperative myocardial stunning in a premature neonate. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan; 8(1):61-3.

  108. Namachivayam P, Crossland DS, Butt WW, Shekerdemian LS. Early experience with Levosimendan in children with ventricular dysfunction. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006 Sep; 7(5):445-8.

  109. Yu XR, Xu N, Huang ST, Zhang QL, Wang ZC, Cao H, Chen Q. Effects of different oral care strategies on postoperative pneumonia in infants with mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized controlled study. Transl Pediatr. 2021 Feb; 10(2):359-365.

  110. Tural-Kara T. et al. Underlying Diseases and Causative Microorganisms of Recurrent Pneumonia in Children: A 13-Year Study in a University Hospital // Journal of tropical pediatrics. – 2019. – Vol. 65. – No. 3. – P. 224-230.

  111. Shi S. S. et al. Perioperative risk factors for prolonged mechanical ventilation following cardiac surgery in neonates and young infants. Chest. – 2008. – Vol. 134. – No. 4. – P. 768-774.

  112. Norwood WI, Kirklin JK, Sanders SP. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: experience with palliative surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1980; 45:87–91.

  113. Norwood WI, Lang P, Casteneda AR, Campbell DN. Experience with operations for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981; 82:511–519.

  114. Sano S, Ishino K, Kawada M, Honjo O. Right ventricle-pulmonary artery shunt in first-stage palliation of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annual. 2004; 7:22–31.

  115. Gibbs JL, Wren C, Watterson KG, Hunter S, Hamilton JR. Stenting of the arterial duct combined with banding of the pulmonary arteries and atrial septectomy or septostomy: a new approach to palliation for the hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Br Heart J. 1993; 69:551–555.

  116. Schranz D, Bauer A, Reich B, Steinbrenner B, Recla S, Schmidt D, Apitz C, Thul J, Valeske K, Bauer J, Müller M, Jux C, Michel-Behnke I, Akintürk H. Fifteen-year single center experience with the “Giessen Hybrid” approach for hypoplastic left heart and variants: current strategies and outcomes. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015; 36:365–373.

  117. Schranz D, Voelkel NF. “Nihilism” of chronic heart failure therapy in children and why effective therapy is withheld. Eur J Pediatr. 2016; 175:445–455.

  118. Sakurai T, Kado H, Nakano T, Hinokiyama K, Shiose A, Kajimoto M, Joo K, Ueda Y. Early results of bilateral pulmonary artery banding for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Dec; 36(6):973-9.

  119. Pizarro C, Derby CD, Baffa JM, Murdison KA, Radtke WA. Improving the outcome of high-risk neonates with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: hybrid procedure or conventional surgical palliation? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 33:613—8.

  120. Schulz A, Sinzobahamvya N, Cho MY, Böttcher W, Miera O, Redlin M, Ovroutski S, Photiadis J. Bilateral Pulmonary Artery Banding before Norwood Procedure: Survival of High-Risk Patients. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jan; 68(1):30-37.

  121. Guleserian KJ, Barker GM, Sharma MS, et al. Bilateral pulmonary artery banding for resuscitation in high-risk, single-ventricle neonates and infants: a single-center experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145(01):206–213, discussion 213–214.

  122. Hirata Y, Miyata H, Hirahara N, Murakami A, Kado H, Sakamoto K, Sano S, Takamoto S. Long-Term Results of Bilateral Pulmonary Artery Banding Versus Primary Norwood Procedure. Pediatr Cardiol. 2018 Jan;39(1):111-119.

  123. Kitahori K, Murakami A, Takaoka T, Takamoto S, Ono M. Precise evaluation of bilateral pulmonary artery banding for initial palliation in high-risk hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 Nov;140(5):1084-91.

  124. Sakurai T, Sakurai H, Yamana K, Nonaka T, Noda R, Otsuka R, Osawa T. Expectations and limitations after bilateral pulmonary artery banding. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Oct;50(4):626-631.

  125. Kalashnikov S.V., Bokeria L.A., Nefedova I.E. Biventricular correction of congenital heart defects in patients with hypoplasia of left heart structures: morphometric and hemodynamic criteria. Pediatric Diseases of Heart and Vessels. 2020; 17 (1): 25-37.

  126. Licht DJ, Shera DM, Clancy RR, Wernovsky G, Montenegro LM, Nicolson SC, Zimmerman RA, Spray TL, Gaynor JW, Vossough A. Brain maturation is delayed in infants with complex congenital heart defects. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 137:536–537.

  127. Knirsch WL, Liamlahi R, Hug MI, Hoop R, von Rhein M, Prêtre R, Kretschmar O, Latal B. Mortality and neurodevelopmental outcome at 1 year of age comparing hybrid and Norwood procedures. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012; 42:33–39.

  128. Rudd NA, Frommelt MA, Tweddell JS, Hehir DA, Mussatto KA, Frontier KD, Slicker JA, Bartz PJ, Ghanayem NS. Improving interstage survival after Norwood operation: outcomes from 10 years of home monitoring. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 148:1540–1547.

  129. McCrindle BW, Williams RV, Mitchell PD, Hsu DT, Paridon SM, Atz AM, Li JS, Newburger JW, for the Pediatric Heart Network Investigators. Relationship of patient and medical characteristics to health status in children and adolescents after the Fontan procedure. Circulation. 2006; 113:1123–1129.

  130. Anderson PAW, Breitbart RE, McCrindle BW, Sleeper LA, Atz AM, Hsu DT, Lu M, Margossian R, Williams RV. The Fontan Patient: Inconsistencies in Medication Therapy Across Seven Pediatric Heart Network Centers. Pediatr Cardiol. 2010; 31:1219–1228.

  131. Trivedi B, Smith PB, Barker PCA, Jaggers J, Lodge AJ, Kanter RJ. Arrhythmias in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Am Heart J. 2011; 161:138–144.

  132. Idorn L, Juul K, Jensen AS, Hanel B, Nielsen KG, Andersen H, Reimers JI, Sørensen KE, Søndergaard L. Arrhythmia and exercise intolerance in Fontan patients: current status and future burden. Int J Cardiol. 2013; 168:1458–1465.

  133. Alsaied T, Alsidawi S, Allen CC, Faircloth J, Palumbo JS, Veldtman GR. Strategies for thromboprophylaxis in Fontan circulation: a meta-analysis. Heart. 2015; 101:1731–1737.

  134. Monagle P, Cochrane A, Roberts R, Manlhiot C, Weintraub R, Szechtman B, Hughes M, Andrew M, McCrindle BW, Fontan Anticoagulation Study Group. A multicenter, randomized trial comparing heparin/warfarin and acetylsalicylic acid as primary thromboprophylaxis for 2 years after the Fontan procedure in children. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011; 58:645–651.

  135. Thacker D, Patel A, Dodds K, Goldberg DJ, Semeao E, Rychik J. Use of oral budesonide in the management of protein-losing enteropathy after the Fontan operation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 89:837–842.

  136. Anne P, Du W, Mattoo TK, Zilberman MV. Nephropathy in patients after Fontan palliation. Int J Cardiol. 2009; 132:244–247.

  137. Van Hare GF, Ackerman MJ, Evangelista J-AK, Kovacs RJ, Myerburg RJ, Shafer KM, Warnes CA, Washington RL, American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology, and the American College of Cardiology. Eligibility and Disqualification Recommendations for Competitive Athletes With Cardiovascular Abnormalities: Task Force 4: Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2015; 132:e281–91.

  138. Jonas R, Jonas RA. Cardiac surgery and neurological injury in children. Heart Lung Circ. 2000; 9:16–22.

  139. Hellmund A, Berg C, Herberg U, Geipel A, Kempe A, Gembruch U. Levoatrial cardinal vein in a series of five prenatal cases with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and intact atrial septum. Ultraschall in Med 2017; 38:206–11.

  140. Atz AM, Travison TG, Williams IA, Pearson GD, Laussen PC, Mahle WT et al.  Prenatal diagnosis and risk factors for preoperative death in neonates with single right ventricle and systemic outflow obstruction: screening data from the Pediatric Heart Network Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 140:1245–50.

  141. Donofrio MT , Moon-Grady AJ , Hornberger LK , Copel JA , Sklansky MS , Abuhamad A et al.; American Heart Association Adults with Congenital Heart Disease Joint Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young and Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, and Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing. Diagnosis and treatment of fetal cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014; 129:2183–242.

  142. Herberg U, Berg C, Geipel A, Gembruch U, Breuer J. Foetal therapy: what works? Closed interatrial septum. Cardiol Young 2014; 24:47–54.

  143. Vogel M, McElhinney DB, Wilkins-Haug LE, Marshall AC, Benson CB, Juraszek AL et al.  Aortic stenosis and severe mitral regurgitation in the fetus resulting in giant left atrium and hydrops: pathophysiology, outcomes, and preliminary experience with pre-natal cardiac intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:348–55.

  144. Barron DJ , Kilby MD , Davies B , Wright JGC , Jones TJ , Brawn WJ. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Lancet 2009; 374:551–64.

  145. Alphonso N, Angelini A, Barron DJ, Bellsham-Revell H, Blom NA, Brown K, Davis D, Duncan D, Fedrigo M, Galletti L, Hehir D, Herberg U, Jacobs JP, Januszewska K, Karl TR; (Chaiman HLHS Guidelines Task Force); Malec E, Maruszewski B, Montgomerie J, Pizzaro C, Schranz D, Shillingford AJ, Simpson JM. Guidelines for the management of neonates and infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: The European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Guidelines Task Force. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Sep 1;58(3):416-499.

  146. Egbe A , Uppu S , Lee S , Stroustrup A , Ho D , Srivastava S. Temporal variation of birth prevalence of congenital heart disease in the United States. Congenit Heart Dis 2015;10:43–50.

  147. Sathanandam SK , Philip R , Gamboa D , Van Bergen A , Ilbawi MN , Knott-Craig C et al.  Management of hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact atrial septum: a two-centre experience. Cardiol Young 2016; 26:1072–81.

  148. Arai S, Fujii Y, Kotani Y, Kuroko Y, Kasahara S, Sano S. Surgical outcome of hypoplastic left heart syndrome with intact atrial septum. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2015; 23:1034–8.

  149. Gellis L , Drogosz M , Lu M , Sleeper LA , Cheng H , Allan C et al.  Echocardiographic predictors of neonatal illness severity in fetuses with critical left heart obstruction with intact or restrictive atrial septum. Prenat Diagn 2018;38:788–94.

  150. Saul D, Degenhardt K, Iyoob SD, Surrey LF, Johnson AM, Johnson MP et al.  Hypoplastic left heart syndrome and the nutmeg lung pattern in utero: a cause and effect relationship or prognostic indicator? Pediatr Radiol 2016;46:483–9.

  151. Jacobs JP. Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome: Definition, Morphology, and Classification. World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery. 2022;13(5):559-564.

  152. Yagi H, Liu X, Gabriel GC, Wu Y, Peterson K, Murray SA et al.  The genetic landscape of hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Pediatr Cardiol 2018; 39:1069–81.

  153. Perry DJ, Mullen CR, Carvajal HG, Brar AK, Eghtesady P. Familial screening for left-sided congenital heart disease: what is the evidence? What is the cost? Diseases 2017;5:29.

  154. Zakaria D, Tang X, Bhakta R, ElHassan NO, Prodhan P. Chromosomal abnormalities affect the surgical outcome in infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a large cohort analysis. Pediatr Cardiol 2018;39:11–18.

  155. Gordon BM, Rodriguez S, Lee M, Chang R-K. Decreasing number of deaths of infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Pediatr 2008; 153:354–8.

  156. Peterson AL, Quartermain MD, Ades A, Khalek N, Johnson MP, Rychik J. Impact of mode of delivery on markers of perinatal hemodynamics in infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome. J Pediatr 2011;159:64–9.

  157. Costello JM, Pasquali SK, Jacobs JP, He X, Hill KD, Cooper DS et al.  Gestational age at birth and outcomes after neonatal cardiac surgery: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Circulation 2014;129:2511–17.

  158. Marx GR, Shirali G, Levine JC, Guey LT, Cnota JF, Baffa JM et al.  Multicenter study comparing shunt type in the Norwood procedure for single-ventricle lesions: three-dimensional echocardiographic analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6:934–42.

  159. Gorbatykh A, Manannikov D, Ivanilova A, Averkin I, Zubarev D, et al. A clinical case of successful palliative endovascular treatment of a patient with a single ventricle, mitral valve atresia, an intact atrial septum and persistent cardinal vein. Egypt Heart J. 2023 May 18; 75(1):41.

  160. Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Escobedo MB, Kapadia VS, Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM et al.  Part 13: neonatal resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2015;132:S543–60.

  161. Mercer-Rosa L, Goldberg DJ. Prognostic value of serial echocardiography in hypoplastic left heart syndrome: smaller hearts, better results. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2018;11:e008006.

  162. Fraser CD, Carberry KE. Congenital heart disease. In: Townsend CM, Beauchamp RD, Evers BM, Mattox KL (eds). Sabiston Textbook of Surgery, 19th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier, Saunders, 2012, 1611–49.

  163. Fricker FJ. Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: diagnosis and early management. NeoReviews 2008; 9:e253–61.

  164. Slicker J , Hehir DA , Horsley M , Monczka J , Stern KW , Roman B et al.  Nutrition algorithms for infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome; birth through the first interstage period. Congenit Heart Dis 2013;8:89–102.

  165. Carpenito K-R , Prusinski R , Kirchner K , Simsic J , Miao Y , Luce W et al.  Results of a feeding protocol in patients undergoing the hybrid procedure. Pediatr Cardiol 2016; 37:852–9.

  166. Iannucci GJ , Oster ME , Mahle WT. Necrotising enterocolitis in infants with congenital heart disease: the role of enteral feeds. Cardiol Young 2013; 23:553–9.

  167. Akkinapally S, Hundalani SG, Kulkarni M, Fernandes CJ, Cabrera AG, Shivanna B et al.  Prostaglandin E1 for maintaining ductal patency in neonates with ductal-dependent cardiac lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;2:CD011417.

  168. Karamlou T, Najm HK. Evolution of care pathways for babies with hypoplastic left heart syndrome: integrating mechanistic and clinical process investigation, standardization, and collaborative study. J Thorac Dis. 2020 Mar;12(3):1174-1183.

  169. Gaynor JW, Mahle WT, Cohen MI, Ittenbach RF, DeCampli WM, Steven JM et al.  Risk factors for mortality after the Norwood procedure. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2002; 22:82–9.

  170. Tabbutt S, Dominguez TE, Ravishankar C, Marino BS, Gruber PJ, Wernovsky G et al.  Outcomes after the stage I reconstruction comparing the right ventricular to pulmonary artery conduit with the modified Blalock Taussig shunt. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80:1582–90; discussion 1590–1.

  171. Chowdhury SM, Graham EM, Atz AM, Bradley SM, Kavarana MN, Butts RJ. Validation of a simple score to determine risk of hospital mortality after the Norwood procedure. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016; 28:425–33.

  172. Azakie T, Merklinger SL, McCrindle BW, Van Arsdell GS, Lee KJ, Benson LN et al.  Evolving strategies and improving outcomes of the modified Norwood procedure: a 10-year single-institution experience.

  173. McGuirk SP, Stickley J, Griselli M, Stumper OF, Laker SJ, Barron DJ et al.  Risk assessment and early outcome following the Norwood procedure for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 29:675–81.

  174. National guidelines for the management of children with congenital heart disease. Ed. L.A. Bokeria. Moscow, 2014.

  175. Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation No. 4 dated January 28, 2021, "On Approval of Sanitary Rules and Norms SanPiN 3.3686-21 'Sanitary and Epidemiological Requirements for the Prevention of Infectious Diseases'."

  176. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1134n dated October 20, 2020, "On Approval of the Procedure for Medical Examination of the Recipient, Performing Individual Compatibility Tests, Including Biological Test, During Transfusion of Donor Blood and/or Its Components"

  177. Axelrod B.A., Balashova E.N., Bautin A.E., Bahovadinov B.B., Biryukova L.S. et al. Clinical use of red blood cell-containing components of donor blood. Hematology and Transfusiology. 2018;63(4):372-435.

  178. Monagle P, Chan AKC, Goldenberg NA, Ichord RN, Journeycake JM, Nowak-Göttl U, Vesely SK. Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e737S-e801S.

  179. Kupryashov A.A., Tokmakakova K.A. Blood coagulation disorders in cardiovascular surgery. In: Hemostasis system. Theoretical foundations and clinical practice: National Guidelines / O.A. Rukavitsyn, S.V. Ignatiev, A.G. Rumyantsev [et al.]. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media Publishing Group LLC, 2024. 944 p. ISBN 978-5-9704-8497-5.

  180. Bharucha T, Viola N. The tricuspid valve in hypoplastic left heart syndrome: Echocardiography provides insight into anatomy and function. Front Pediatr. 2023 Mar 27;11:1145161

  181. Mart CR, Eckhauser AW, Murri M, Su JT. A systematic method for using 3D echocardiography to evaluate tricuspid valve insufficiency in hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Ann Pediatr Cardiol. (2014) 7(3):193.

  182. Rao S, Challapudi G, Chellu N, Bhimani S, Prieto L, Komarlu R. Selective Coronary Artery Angiography in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome. J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Dec;32(12):E326-E330.

  183. Murni IK, MacLaren G, Morrow D, et al. Perioperative infections in congenital heart disease. Cardiol Young 2017;27(S6):S14e21.

  184. Wang X, Li S, Huo D, et al. Nosocomial Infections After Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease Surgery: Data from National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases in China. Infect Drug Resist. 2024;17:1615-1623.

  185. Anderson BR, Ciarleglio AJ, Krishnamurthy G, et al. Neonatal hypoplastic left heart syndrome: effects of bloodstream infections on outcomes and costs. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99(5):1648-54.

  186. Yu X, Chen M, Liu X. et al. Risk factors of nosocomial infection after cardiac surgery in children with congenital heart disease. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12879-020-4769-6.

  187. Rallis, D.; Giapros, V.; Serbis, A. et al. Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance in Neonatal Intensive Care Units: Rational Use of Antibiotics in Neonatal Sepsis. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 508.

  188. Crellen T., Turner P., Pol S., et al. Transmission dynamics and control of multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in neonates in a developing country. Elife. 2019;3(8):e50468.

  189. Guidelines for the prevention and control of carbapenemresistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in health care facilities. Geneva:World Health Organization; 2017. Available at: https:// apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259462.

  190. Lekmanov A.U., Mironov P.I., Aleksandrovich Yu.S., Azovskij D.K., Popov D.A., Pshenisnov K.V., et al. Sepsis in children: Federal clinical guideline (draft). Russian journal of pediatric surgery anesthesia and intensive care. 2021;11(2):241-292.

  191. Lee Y.Q., Ahmad K.A., Velayuthan R.D., et al. Clonal relatedness in the acquisition of intestinal carriage and transmission of multidrug resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli and its risk factors among preterm infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Pediatr Neonatol. 2021;62(2):129137.

  192. Sakai AM, Iensue TNAN, Pereira KO, et al. Colonization by multidrug-resistant microorganisms of hospitalized newborns and their mothers in the neonatal unit context. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2020, 31;14(7):765-771.

  193. Popov D.A. et al. Colonization of mucous membranes by "problem" microflora and etiology of postoperative infectious complications in infants in the first year of life with congenital heart defects. Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2022;2:139-146.

  194. Organization and implementation of microbiological monitoring in medical organizations: Methodological recommendations: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health, 2024. – 38 p.

  195. Golukhova E.Z., Kim A.I., Zavalikhina T.V., Nefedova I.E. et al. Analysis of medical care delivery to children with congenital heart defects in the Russian Federation and prerequisites for creating a registry in the modern era of digital medical information systems. Creative Cardiology. 2023; 17 (3): 315–21.

  196. Golukhova E.Z., Kim A.I., Zavalikhina T.V., Nefedova I.E., Kalashnikov S.V. Reserves for reducing infant mortality from congenital heart defects. Methodological recommendations. Moscow: Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery of the Russian Ministry of Health; 2024: 64 p. DOI: 10.24022/978-5-7983-0461-8-2024-1-64.

  197. Giglia T., Massicotte M., Tweddell J. et al. Prevention and Treatment of Thrombosis in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation.2013;128:2622-2703.

  198. Boucher AA, Heneghan JA, Jang S, Spillane KA, Abarbanell AM, Steiner ME, Meyer AD. A Narrative review of postoperative anticoagulation therapy for congenital cardiac disease. Front Surg. 2022 Jun 14;9:907782.

  199. McCrindle BW, Michelson AD, Van Bergen AH, Suzana Horowitz E, Pablo Sandoval J, Justino H, Harris KC, Jefferies JL, Miriam Pina L, Peluso C, Nessel K, Lu W, Li JS; UNIVERSE Study Investigators *. Thromboprophylaxis for Children Post-Fontan Procedure: Insights From the UNIVERSE Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Nov 16;10(22):e021765.

  200. Roehl, S. L., & Townsend, R. J. (1982). Alprostadil (Prostin VR Pediatric Sterile Solution, the Upjohn Company). Drug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy, 16(11), 823–832. 

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

  1. Avramenko A.A. (Samara)

  2. Apkhanova T.V., MD, "National Association of Experts in Spa Treatment"

  3. Arkhipov A.N., PhD (Novosibirsk)

  4. Arakelyan V.S., Prof. (Moscow)

  5. Bogdanov V.N. (Chelyabinsk)

  6. Bokeria L.A., Academician of the RAS (Moscow), "Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia"

  7. Boriskov M.V., MD (Krasnodar)

  8. Gavrilov R.Yu. (Volgograd), "Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia"

  9. Grigoryan A.M., PhD (Moscow), "Russian Scientific Society of Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment Specialists"

  10. Gorbatikov K.V., MD (Tyumen)

  11. Gorbatykh Yu.N., MD (Novosibirsk)

  12. Gushchin D.K., PhD (Moscow)

  13. Kalashnikov S.V., PhD (Moscow)

  14. Kim A.I., Prof. (Moscow), "Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia"

  15. Kovalev I.A., MD, PhD (Moscow), "Association of Pediatric Cardiologists of Russia"

  16. Kokshenev I.V., Prof. (Moscow), "Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia"

  17. Konchugova T.V., MD, PhD, Professor, "National Association of Experts in Spa Treatment and Balneology" Krivoshchekov E.V., MD, PhD (Tomsk), "Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia

  18. Krivoshchekov E.V., MD, PhD (Tomsk), "Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia"

  19. Kupryashov A.A., Prof. (Moscow)

  20. Movsesyan R.R., Corresponding Member of the RAS (Saint Petersburg), "Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia"

  21. Nalimov K.A., PhD (Khabarovsk)

  22. Nefedova I.E., MD, PhD (Moscow)

  23. Petrushenko D.Yu., PhD (Kazan)

  24. Plotnikov M.V., PhD (Astrakhan), "Association of Cardiovascular Surgeons of Russia"

  25. Podzolkov V.P., Academician of the RAS (Moscow)

  26. Rucheva N.A., PhD (Moscow), All-Russian Public Organization for the Promotion of the Development of Diagnostic Radiology and Therapy "Russian Society of Roentgenologists and Radiologists"

  27. Svobodov A.A., Prof. (Moscow)

  28. Sinelnikov Yu.S., MD, PhD (Perm)

  29. Sinitsyn V.E., MD, PhD, Professor (Moscow), All-Russian Public Organization for the Promotion of the Development of Diagnostic Radiology and Therapy "Russian Society of Roentgenologists and Radiologists"

  30. Teplov P.V. (Krasnoyarsk)

  31. Fesyun Anatoly Dmitrievich, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, President of the National Association of Experts in Spa Treatment and Balneology

  32. Shatalov K.V., MD, PhD (Moscow)

  33. Yurlov I.A., PhD, is not a member of the ACSR (Moscow).

  34. Yakovlev Maxim Yuryevich, MD, PhD, "National Association of Experts in Spa Treatment and Balneology"

All members of the Working Group have confirmed that they have no financial support or conflicts of interest to disclose.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience for these clinical guidelines:

  • Pediatrician

  • Cardiologist

  • Pediatric Cardiologist

  • Cardiovascular Surgeon

  • Neonatologist

  • Ultrasound Diagnostics Physician

Methods used for collecting/selecting evidence: electronic database search.

Description of methods used to assess the quality and strength of evidence: the evidence base for the guidelines includes publications indexed in the PubMed and Scopus databases. The literature search depth was 30 years.

Methods used to assess the quality and strength of evidence

  • expert consensus;

  • evaluation of the recommendation quality in accordance with the rating scheme (Table P1).

  • evaluation of the evidence strength in accordance with the rating scheme (Table P2).

During the development of the clinical guidelines, a new grading system for levels of evidence (LE) and grades of recommendation (GR) for therapeutic, rehabilitative, preventive, and diagnostic interventions was used (Tables P1, P2, and P3), introduced in 2018 by the Center for Healthcare Quality Assessment and Control of the Russian Ministry of Health. The National Guidelines were formulated based on the ESC guidelines, taking into account national specifics, diagnostic and treatment features, and the availability of medical care.

Table P1. Scale for grading levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

Levels of Evidence (LE)

Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 103n dated February 28, 2019 "On approval of the procedure and timelines for the development of clinical guidelines, their revision, the standard template for clinical guidelines, and requirements for their structure, composition, and scientific validity of the information included in clinical guidelines" (registered on May 8, 2019, No. 54588)

1

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, excluding randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

Table P2. Scale for grading levels of evidence (LE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference-standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, excluding randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Studies without sequential reference-standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

Table P3. Scale for grading grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

Grade of Recommendation (GR)

Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 103n dated February 28, 2019 "On approval of the procedure and timelines for the development of clinical guidelines, their revision, the standard template for clinical guidelines, and requirements for their structure, composition, and scientific validity of the information included in clinical guidelines" (registered on May 8, 2019, No. 54588)

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

C

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.

The update mechanism for clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision—at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based data regarding the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or the availability of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

  1. Federal Law No. 323-FZ dated November 21, 2011 "On the Fundamentals of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation"

  2. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 918n dated November 15, 2012 "On approval of the procedure for providing medical care to patients with cardiovascular diseases"

  3. Order of the Russian Ministry of Labor No. 585n dated August 27, 2019 "On classifications and criteria used in the implementation of medical and social assessment of citizens by federal state institutions"

  4. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 103n dated February 28, 2019 "On approval of the procedure and timelines for the development of clinical guidelines, their revision, the standard template for clinical guidelines, and requirements for their structure, composition, and scientific validity of the information included in clinical guidelines" (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on May 8, 2019, No. 54588);

  5. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 804n dated October 13, 2017 "On approval of the nomenclature of medical services";

  6. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 700n dated October 7, 2015 "On the nomenclature of specialties of specialists with higher medical and pharmaceutical education";

  7. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 205n dated May 2, 2023 "On approval of the Nomenclature of positions of medical workers and pharmaceutical workers"

  8. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 4n dated June 6, 2012 "On approval of the nomenclature classification of medical devices".

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix B. Algorithms of physician actions — Hypoplastic left heart syndrome

Appendix C. Patient Information

Dear patient (patient's parents), the examination results revealed a complex congenital heart defect in you (your child) — hypoplastic left heart syndrome. By voluntarily consenting to the surgery, you must understand the purpose and risks of the operation, which your attending physician will explain to you.

HLHS occurs in the early stages of fetal development. The causes of embryogenesis disorders are numerous: maternal infectious diseases in early pregnancy, chronic parental diseases, parental harmful habits, environmental and genetic factors, etc. Depending on the size of fetal communications (patent foramen ovale, patent ductus arteriosus), the clinical manifestations of the defect can vary significantly. However, in any case, with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, the condition after birth will be severe with progressive deterioration over time. Therefore, one should not impede the prompt transfer of the child from the maternity hospital to a cardiac surgery center. To stabilize the condition and ensure the child can withstand transportation immediately after birth, venous access will be established and intravenous administration of C01EA prostaglandins will be initiated to prevent the closure of the patent ductus arteriosus, otherwise its closure will lead to the immediate death of the infant. The administration of this drug in most cases leads to short-term stabilization, making it possible to transfer the child to a cardiac surgery center to clarify the anatomy of the defect and select the optimal surgical treatment.

After the child's transfer, the severity of the condition and the presence of comorbid pathology will be clarified. If the condition is stable, surgical intervention is usually performed within 24–48 hours from the moment of transfer. In cases of extreme severity, resuscitation measures aimed at stabilizing the condition will be performed first, and only after stabilization will the issue of surgical intervention be addressed.

Hypoplastic left heart syndrome involves a staged surgical approach and is characterized by the impossibility of complete anatomical correction of the defect. The staged approach consists of three or four surgical interventions and is aimed solely at creating acceptable conditions for the child's life and development. The main goal of reconstructive interventions is the separation of arterial and venous blood flows. Since this congenital heart defect is one of the most severe, one must also understand the high risks of an adverse outcome in the treatment of this pathology. After each stage of correction, various complications may occur in the early postoperative period: postoperative bleeding; heart failure; respiratory failure requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation; acute renal failure; infectious complications, etc. The progression of these complications can lead to irreversible consequences. The development of complications is also possible during the interstage periods.

In most cases, each subsequent staged operation leads to an improved condition. It should be understood that the number of stages is not final, and additional surgical interventions may be required (in the event of rapid deterioration of the child's condition).

An alternative to hemodynamic corrections can be heart transplantation or heart-lung transplantation. This procedure can be performed at any stage of treatment in the presence of vital indications.

Treatment of this congenital heart defect often requires a prolonged hospital stay and frequent monitoring in the interstage period, which also requires understanding and maximum responsibility from the parents.

It is important not to miss follow-up examinations after surgery for timely evaluation of correction results and detection of possible complications, to follow the doctor's recommendations, and to take all prescribed medications in a timely manner.

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

No.

Scales and calculators from this guideline

Dopamine calculatorCalculation of dopamine infusion rate (mcg/kg/min → ml/h) with automaticDobutamine calculatorCalculation of dobutamine infusion rate (mcg/kg/min → ml/h) with automatic

If you practice in the specialty of cardiology

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer based on the clinical guidelines «Hypoplastic left heart syndrome» and other current Russian Ministry of Health clinical guidelines with a reference to the section, rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines