List of Abbreviations
VAS – visual analog scale
BBD – benign breast dysplasia
CI – confidence interval
Malignant neoplasm – malignant neoplasm
IHC – immunohistochemical study
BMI – body mass index
COC – combined oral contraceptives (ATC – Progestogens and estrogens, fixed combinations)
MHT – menopausal hormone therapy
ICD-10 – International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision
MMG – mammography
INR – international normalized ratio
MRI – magnetic resonance imaging
NSAIDs – non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from the ATC group of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic products
FNAB – fine-needle aspiration biopsy
BC – breast cancer
US – ultrasound examination
ABUE – automated breast ultrasound elastography
FCC – fibrocystic condition
CDI – color Doppler imaging
PCD – power Doppler color mapping
ADH – atypical ductal hyperplasia
ALH – atypical lobular hyperplasia
BI-RADS – Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
FEA – flat epithelial atypia
LCIS – lobular carcinoma in situ
MD – mammographic density
Terms and Definitions
Benign breast disease (BBD) is a group of conditions characterized by a wide spectrum of proliferative and regressive changes in breast tissue with an imbalance between the epithelial and connective tissue components [1].
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Benign breast disease (BBD) is a heterogeneous group of conditions characterized by a wide spectrum of proliferative and regressive changes in breast tissue with an imbalance between the epithelial and connective tissue components [1].
Comments: Synonyms for BBD include: "mastopathy", "fibrocystic mastopathy", "fibrocystic disease", "dyshormonal mammary hyperplasia", "fibroadenomatosis"
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Risk factors for BBD include: high socioeconomic status, low body mass index in childhood and adolescence, rapid growth rate during adolescence, obesity, excessive intake of animal fats and meat (more than 3 servings per day during adolescence), alcohol consumption (between 16 and 23 years of age), caffeine intake, deficiency of vegetables, fruits, nuts (peanuts), and dietary fiber (during adolescence), sedentary lifestyle, prolonged combined menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) for more than 8 years, congenital and acquired genetic alterations, and high mammographic density [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13].
BBD is a hormone-dependent condition caused by an imbalance in the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis. Among all reproductive organs at risk for hormone-dependent hyperplastic processes, the breasts are affected most frequently, acting as the first indicator of neurohumoral homeostasis disorders [14]. The pathogenesis of BBD is based on chronic hyperestrogenism. Estrogens induce proliferation of the ductal alveolar epithelium and stroma, which, among other effects, leads to duct obstruction and cyst formation. Progesterone, conversely, counteracts these processes, promoting epithelial differentiation and the cessation of mitotic activity. Factors such as ovarian insufficiency (anovulation, luteal phase defect, relative estradiol predominance and progesterone deficiency), altered receptor sensitivity to sex steroid hormones, epithelial proliferation and apoptosis activity, and altered breast tissue vascularization play a significant role in the pathogenesis of BBD [15]. Furthermore, a link has been established between the development of BBD and hyperprolactinemia, which is attributed to the ability of prolactin to sensitize breast tissue to estrogens and increase the number of estradiol receptors therein (Table 1).
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
Benign breast disease (BBD) is the most common breast condition. Although statistical records for BBD are not maintained, various authors estimate its prevalence in the female population to be 50% or higher. The peak incidence of BBD occurs at 40-44 years of age, reaching 200-400 per 100,000 population per year, followed by a gradual decline by age 65 [16]. Certain forms of BBD are associated with an increased future risk of breast cancer (BC) [17], [18].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
N60: Benign mammary dysplasia:
N60.0 Solitary breast cyst
N60.1 Diffuse cystic mastopathy
Excludes: with epithelial proliferation (N60.3)
N60.2 Fibroadenosis of breast
Excludes: fibroadenoma of breast (D24)
N60.3 Fibrosclerosis of breast (cystic mastopathy with epithelial proliferation)
N60.4 Mammary duct ectasia
N60.8 Other benign mammary dysplasias
N60.9 Benign mammary dysplasia, unspecified
N62 Hypertrophy of breast
N63 Unspecified lump in breast
N64.4 Mastodynia
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
Clinical and radiological classification of mastopathy
The severity of dysplasia is designated as mammographic density (MD), which is subdivided into 4 groups depending on the ratio of fibroglandular and adipose components. Quantitative assessment of MD was first described in 1976 by Dr. John N. Wolfe. Wolfe used an MD classification based on four grades – NI, P1, P2, and DY, ranging from the lowest adipose density and lowest risk of breast cancer to the densest structure with the highest risk, which corresponds to the modern American College of Radiology (ACR) classification – density types A, B, C, D, and N.I. Rozhkova's classification based on the percentage ratio of fibroglandular to adipose components:
Mild - MD <25%> ACR-A (N1)
Moderate - MD <50%> ACR-B (P1)
Pronounced - MD <75%> ACR-C (P2)
Severe - MD >75%-100% ACR-D (DY)
The degree of breast mammographic density correlates directly with the risk of developing breast cancer (the higher the mammographic density, the greater the risk of breast cancer) [19], [20], [21], [22], [23].
Classification of BBD according to the severity of proliferative processes in breast tissue (College of American Pathologists) [24].
without epithelial proliferation (non-proliferative form);
with epithelial proliferation (proliferative form);
with atypical epithelial proliferation.
The relative risk of developing breast cancer is 1.17 (95% CI 0.94-1.47) for non-proliferative BBD, 2.07 (95% CI 1.58-1.95) for proliferative FCC without atypia, and 3.93 (95% CI 3.24-4.76) for proliferative FCC with atypia (Table 2) [17].
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
BBD may have an asymptomatic or symptomatic course. Clinical manifestations of BBD include mastalgia, palpable lumps in the breast, and nipple discharge.
Mastalgia is characterized by subjective breast pain of varying intensity and occurs in the majority of patients with BBD. It is subdivided into cyclic and non-cyclic mastalgia. Cyclic mastalgia is a functional condition manifested by breast tenderness and swelling in the premenstrual period that resolves spontaneously with the onset of menstruation. Typically, the pain is a dull ache. True mastalgia is usually bilateral. The pain may be asymmetric and more pronounced in quadrants with well-developed glandular breast tissue (the upper outer quadrants). Non-cyclic mastalgia is unrelated to the menstrual cycle and is more frequently unilateral and localized. Causes of non-cyclic mastalgia include mastitis, trauma, thrombophlebitis (Mondor's disease), cysts, and tumors. Extramammary mastalgia occurs in costochondral syndrome (Tietze's syndrome), chest wall trauma, cervical and thoracic radiculopathy, and shingles. In some cases, breast pain can be caused by certain medications: hormonal agents, antidepressants, antihypertensive drugs, and cardiac medications.
Women with mild, short-lived mastalgia and no physical breast abnormalities have the same risk of breast cancer (1.2%-6.7%) as women without mastalgia. With more severe and prolonged pain, the risk of developing breast cancer increases [25], [26], [27], [28].
Breast tissue heterogeneity in BBD may be associated with various areas of induration. In the diffuse form of BBD, indurations lack distinct borders and present as fibrous strands and fine granularity. Nodular forms of BBD are characterized by indurations with clear contours and a nodular surface.
Nipple discharge may be unilateral or bilateral, originates from multiple ducts, and varies in color from colostrum-like to dark yellow, green, brown, or bright red.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
The diagnosis of BBD is established based on complaints, medical history, physical examination, breast ultrasound, and mammography.
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
Recommended initial evaluation of all patients to clarify complaints, take a medical history, and identify breast cancer risk factors [28], [29].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: When analyzing complaints and medical history, it is necessary to pay attention to symptoms such as pain, presence of masses and lumps in the breast, their location, duration and dynamics over time, as well as the presence and color of spontaneous nipple discharge.
The taking of medical history should include the following patient data: age, presence of bad habits (smoking, alcohol), family history, menstrual character (age at menarche and menopause, duration and regularity of the menstrual cycle), obstetric history (number of previous pregnancies and childbirths and their outcomes, age at first childbirth, duration of breastfeeding), past and current gynecological diseases, surgical interventions on the pelvic organs and mammary glands, past and current somatic diseases (in particular, thyroid diseases, hepatobiliary system disorders, etc.), allergic reactions, and medications taken.
When taking the medical history, it is recommended to pay special attention to the presence of high-risk factors for breast cancer in patients with benign breast diseases [30].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: These factors include [30]:
1) The presence in close relatives (1st–2nd degree) of such diseases as breast cancer (including in men), ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, and their age at the time of diagnosis.
2) Carriage of pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2, PALB2, TP53, CDH1, and PTEN genes in the women with benign breast diseases themselves or in their close relatives.
3) History of chest radiation therapy (medical or technogenic).
4) History of breast biopsy or surgery for atypical breast hyperplasia.
Patients with high-risk factors for breast cancer must be referred for a consultation with an oncologist for further evaluation, selection of an individual (selective) cancer screening program, and implementation of preventive measures [1].
Mastalgia is the most frequent symptom of benign breast diseases, occurring in 45–70% of cases. During clinical examination, the intensity of pain is assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) [31], [33].
[1] Order No. 168n dated March 15, 2022, "On Approval of the Procedure for Dispensary Observation of Adults" by the Russian Ministry of Health.
2.2 Physical Examination
It is recommended to perform a visual examination and palpation of the mammary glands in all female patients to rule out breast pathology [30], [33], [34].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: The method of objective breast examination has a low sensitivity (54%), but its specificity is 94% [35], [36]. Although objective breast examination during screening does not ensure a reduction in breast cancer mortality, it has nevertheless been proven that its use allows for the diagnosis of breast cancer at earlier stages [37].
The direct duties of an obstetrician-gynecologist include risk assessment and early detection of both benign and malignant breast diseases, as well as the provision of specialized care for benign breast diseases, including therapeutic and preventive approaches.
The optimal period for a physical breast examination in menstruating women is considered to be days 5–16 of the menstrual cycle (preferably by day 10 of the menstrual cycle if possible). Non-menstruating women can be examined at any time.
The examination should be performed in a standing position, first with arms lowered and then raised behind the head. The symmetry and shape of the mammary glands, the condition of the nipples, and the skin are assessed. Palpation is performed in the vertical position of the patient; for additional information, it is desirable to also examine the patient in the horizontal position on a couch, lying on the back and on the side. Palpation determines the localization, dimensions, contours of indurations, their surface and consistency, as well as mobility and relationship with surrounding tissues. Palpation covers the entire mammary gland—around the nipple and sequentially by quadrants down to the inframammary fold.
Nodular formations are more clearly defined during clinical examination of patients in a standing position. In the supine position, indurations may lose their outlines and merge with the surrounding adipose tissue. When pressing the induration with the palm against the chest wall, it ceases to be palpable (negative Koenig's sign).
In medical documentation, it is necessary to indicate the location, size, and consistency of detected formations and indurations, their relationship with the skin and surrounding tissues, and the distance from the edge of the areola (Figure 8).
During the objective examination, the presence of signs characteristic of breast cancer is assessed for differential diagnosis with benign breast diseases (Table 3).
The presence of scanty, clear nipple discharge is a physiological norm [28].
Spontaneous, unilateral discharge from a single duct of a serous, serous-hemorrhagic, or hemorrhagic nature may be a clinical manifestation of both benign intraductal proliferation and a malignant neoplasm, and requires a more thorough evaluation.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
It is recommended for differential diagnosis in galactorrhea to perform a pregnancy test (blood human chorionic gonadotropin level test), a blood prolactin level test, and to rule out the use of medications that may cause galactorrhea [38], [39].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: The cause of milk-like discharge can be the use of medications such as antidepressants, domperidone, metoclopramide**, methyldopa**, verapamil**, and combined oral contraceptives (according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification – Progestogens and estrogens, fixed combinations) [38], [40].
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
In hyperprolactinemia, it is recommended to perform a brain MRI to rule out a pituitary adenoma [178].
GCR CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
It is recommended for the diagnosis of benign breast diseases to perform X-ray mammography (MMG) in patients with nodular breast formations, as well as a screening method for women aged 40 to 75 years; and breast ultrasound in young patients (under 40 years old) with dense glandular tissue, pregnant women, and breastfeeding women [1], [32], [39], [40], [41].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: Mammography, which allows for the timely recognition of pathological changes in 92–95% of cases, is recommended for the objective assessment of the condition of the mammary glands [32], [42]. The diagnostic value of mammography depends on compliance with X-ray imaging standards for the breast. Mandatory conditions for performing mammography are: standard examination of both breasts in two projections (craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique at 45 degrees); breast compression; examination of both breasts. The sensitivity of the method is 85–87%, and specificity is 91–92%. With increased mammographic density, the sensitivity of mammography is significantly reduced.
It is recommended, in cases of increased mammographic density C and D, to perform additional diagnostic imaging methods (breast ultrasound, contrast-enhanced breast MRI, or breast tomosynthesis) to rule out breast masses [32], [43], [44], [45].
GGR BLOC 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1).
Comment: High mammographic density (ACR density categories C and D) is an independent risk factor for breast cancer, which can reduce the sensitivity of mammography to 48%. The breast density category according to the ACR classification is indicated in the mammography report for both diagnostic and screening studies; in case of asymmetric density, the category is indicated separately for each breast [32], [46].
It is recommended to perform mammography in the presence of nodular breast formations regardless of age to verify the diagnosis [1], [32], [39], [40], [41].
GGR BLOC 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1).
Comments: Suspicious changes in the breast on mammography may be visualized as a mass or nodular formation, an area of architectural distortion (including radial scar), grouped microcalcifications, focal asymmetry, or changes in the nipple and skin. Not all types of calcifications are suspicious for breast cancer. Microcalcifications suspicious for breast cancer include: ductal segmental and linear distribution, clustered acinar, with architectural distortion [32], [46]. According to international guidelines, for newly detected palpable breast masses, mammography is recommended in women over 30 years of age, although in some cases this study may be performed even in women under 30. Thus, the NCCN guidelines (2023) consider the possibility of using diagnostic mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in women under 30 with newly identified palpable breast masses in the absence of ultrasound findings [32].
It is recommended to perform a breast ultrasound in adult patients under 40 years of age, patients over 40 with developed glandular tissue, pregnant women, and breastfeeding women to verify the diagnosis [32], [47], [48], [49].
Level of Evidence BLevel of Confidence 2Level of recommendation B (level of evidence – 2).
Comments: Ultrasound is an indispensable instrumental diagnostic method in mammology and complements both mammography and magnetic resonance imaging. As additional options for expert ultrasound, Doppler mapping (breast ultrasound with Doppler study) and breast elastography (US elastography) [50], [51], [52] can be used.
Contrast-enhanced breast MRI at the initial stage of benign breast disease diagnosis is not recommended [54], [55].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: Contrast-enhanced breast MRI has high sensitivity but low specificity, which leads to a high number of false-positive results. However, this imaging method provides additional information in complex clinical and diagnostic situations (young age, high mammographic density, "suspicious" nipple discharge, presence of breast implants, in cases of identified BRCA 1 or 2 gene mutations) [56], [57].
Recommended is the use of the BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System) system in screening and diagnostic studies for the adequate interpretation of instrumental imaging findings, the development of a unified diagnostic algorithm, and subsequent patient routing [32], [46], [58], [59].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: The BI-RADS category is uniform for all breast imaging methods; it is indicated separately for the right and left breasts in the study report (Appendix G1, Table 4) [32], [46], [58], [59], [60].
Obstetrician-gynecologists must receive the BI-RADS report:
0 - Inconclusive imaging results (poor quality study, incorrect positioning, insufficient projections). Additional images or prior examination data are required.
1 – Negative. Probability of malignancy: 0%
2 – Benign findings. Probability of malignancy: 0%
3 – Probably benign findings. Additional imaging is indicated (targeted mammography, tomosynthesis, breast ultrasound). Follow-up in 6 months. Probability of malignancy: 0–2%.
4 - Findings requiring morphological verification (fine-needle aspiration biopsy for fluid collections and core needle biopsy for solid masses)
4A - Probability of malignancy: 2–10%,
4B - Probability of malignancy: 10–50%,
4C - Highly suspicious findings, probability of malignancy: 50–95%.
5 – Assigned when findings have all features of malignancy. Probability of malignancy greater than 95%.
6 - Morphologically verified breast cancer.
With BI-RADS 1 and 2 results, the patient is monitored by an obstetrician-gynecologist; for all other BI-RADS categories (0, 3, 4, and 5), an initial appointment (examination, consultation) with an oncologist is necessary to rule out or verify the diagnosis and determine further management. Patients with BI-RADS 6 findings undergo treatment and follow-up by an oncologist.
2.5 Other Procedures
(performed upon recommendation and are the responsibility of the oncologist).
Women with identified complex cystic and nodular breast lesions are referred to an oncologist for diagnosis verification. Indications and contraindications for invasive diagnostic methods are determined by the oncologist, and the interventions themselves are performed in medical organizations licensed in the field of "Oncology".
A wide range of additional technologies is used for further diagnostic clarification, including fine-needle aspiration biopsy, core needle biopsy (targeted percutaneous puncture of a breast neoplasm under ultrasound guidance), vacuum-assisted biopsy under X-ray guidance (per NMU - targeted percutaneous biopsy of a breast neoplasm under X-ray guidance), ultrasound guidance (per NMU - targeted percutaneous puncture of a breast neoplasm under ultrasound guidance), or MRI guidance, as well as excisional biopsy and ductography. After ruling out malignant neoplasms, women with benign breast diseases are kept under dispensary observation by an obstetrician-gynecologist [1], [59], [61].
Recommended is core needle biopsy of a solid breast mass (per NMU - percutaneous breast biopsy) for BI-RADS category 4–5 findings on imaging (performed by an oncologist to confirm or rule out breast cancer [2], [32], [40], [46], [59], [62], [63], [179].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Recommended is follow-up monitoring for a BI-RADS category 3 solid mass to detect signs of growth or transformation [32], [40], [46], [62], [63].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: Follow-up monitoring implies physical examination with mammography and ultrasound every 6 months for 1–2 years. If negative dynamics—changes in the mass characteristics—are noted during follow-up, the patient is re-referred for a consultation with an oncologist [59], [64], [65].
Recommended is follow-up monitoring with a control check in 6 months for simple cysts based on ultrasound results (BI-RADS 2); for tense cysts accompanied by pain, an appointment (examination, consultation) with an oncologist is necessary to address the issue of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) (per NMU - targeted percutaneous puncture of a breast neoplasm under ultrasound guidance) [46], [58], [59].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: According to ultrasound, a simple cyst presents as a round or oval anechoic mass with clear, smooth margins, homogeneous structure, with a capsule, usually showing posterior acoustic enhancement on grayscale, and without vascularity on color Doppler [66].
Recommended for complicated cysts is follow-up monitoring every 6 months in the absence of complaints (signs of inflammation, pain syndrome), including physical examination combined with ultrasound; puncture aspiration biopsy (FNAB) under ultrasound guidance (per NMU - targeted percutaneous puncture of a breast neoplasm under ultrasound guidance) with cyst fluid evacuation and cytological examination of the breast tissue micropreparation is performed according to indications, and mammography is performed if ultrasound findings indicate BI-RADS 3 [28], [40], [46], [59], [67], [68], [180].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
Comments: According to ultrasound, a complicated cyst shares most characteristics of a simple cyst, but with possible visualization of hyperechoic inclusions of various shapes, sizes, and structures (septa, tissue component, debris, etc.) without signs of vascularity on color-coded modes [66], [67].
Recommended is core needle biopsy (per NMU - percutaneous breast biopsy) of the solid component of a cyst in the presence of complex (atypical, complicated) cysts according to ultrasound results of BI-RADS categories 4–5 to confirm or rule out the diagnosis (performed by an oncologist) [46], [59], [66], [68], [69].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: According to ultrasound, a complex (atypical, complicated) cyst simultaneously has anechoic (fluid) and hyperechoic (less often hypoechoic) components, which may be represented by thick walls or septa and/or mural tissue proliferations with signs of vascularity [70], [71], [72], [73].
In the presence of palpable breast masses suspicious for malignant neoplasms, but without signs of a malignant process on ultrasound or mammography, contrast-enhanced breast MRI is recommended for differential diagnosis [74], [179], [180].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Recommended are cytological examination of nipple discharge and ductography to determine the cause of secretion and topical diagnosis in patients with spontaneous serous, serosanguineous, or hemorrhagic nipple discharge [1], [75], [76], [77], [78] (performed by an oncologist).
Level of Evidence BLevel of Confidence 2Level of recommendation B (level of evidence – 2).
Recommended is multi-positional and multi-projection ultrasound of the ductal tree (radial ductal sonography) - NMU - breast ultrasound) when intraductal lesions are suspected [1], [74], [75], [76], [77], [78].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Not recommended is breast MRI and ductography in the absence of data for intraductal changes based on cytological examination of discharge (for diagnostic clarification) in patients with milk-like nipple discharge classified as BI-RADS 1–3 [77], [78], [180], [181], [182].
For adults: Level of recommendation validity B (level of evidence – 3).
For children: Level of recommendation validity C (level of evidence – 5).
Core needle biopsy of a breast neoplasm is recommended (per the Russian Medical Services Nomenclature - Percutaneous breast biopsy) in all cases where there are signs or suspicion of a malignant neoplasm (BI-RADS 4-5) (performed by an oncologists), followed by pathomorphological examination of the biopsy (surgical) breast material (if necessary, with immunohistochemical examination) [32], [40], [46], [59].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: Core needle biopsy is the method of choice for obtaining tissue samples for histological and immunohistochemical examinations.
It is recommended to perform fine-needle aspiration biopsy and core needle biopsy under imaging guidance – mammography (stereotactic – per the Russian Medical Services Nomenclature - Stereotactic breast puncture), ultrasound, or MRI – for patients with breast lumps to clarify the diagnosis [32], [82], [83], [181] (performed by an oncologist).
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (per the Russian Medical Services Nomenclature - Vacuum-assisted aspiration biopsy of a breast neoplasm under X-ray guidance, Vacuum-assisted aspiration biopsy of non-palpable breast neoplasms under ultrasound guidance) or excisional biopsy is recommended to obtain a larger tissue sample to clarify the disease diagnosis [84], [85] (performed by an oncologist).
GCR CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
Comments: These diagnostic methods are performed in clinical situations where the results of the pathomorphological examination of samples obtained via core needle biopsy do not match imaging findings, as well as in cases of technical difficulties during core needle biopsy (sometimes in the presence of breast implants) [84], [85]. Performing an excisional biopsy for non-palpable breast lesions requires prior placement of localization needles under imaging guidance [40].
[1] Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 1130n dated October 20, 2020, “On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care in the Field of ‘Obstetrics and Gynecology’
[2] Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 360n dated June 2, 2021, “On Approval of the Professional Standard ‘Oncologist’
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
3.1 Non-drug treatment
Psychological counseling and relaxation training are recommended for patients with mastalgia to relieve pain [86], [87].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: Observation alone and reassuring the patient that there is no threat to her health help relieve pain in 86% of women with moderate pain intensity and in 22% with acute pain. Approximately 61% of women who listened to relaxation audio cassettes daily for 4 weeks reported a reduction in mastalgia compared to 25% of women in the control group [86], [88].
It is recommended to select a comfortable, supportive bra for patients with mastalgia to improve treatment efficacy [40], [54], [83].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
Comments: A sports bra provides the most effective breast support and helps reduce breast pain [83].
It is recommended that all women restrict or completely avoid methylxanthine-containing products (coffee, tea, chocolate, cocoa, cola) if they have mastalgia, in order to improve treatment efficacy [89], [90].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: Among women who restricted caffeine intake for a year, 61% experienced a reduction or complete disappearance of breast pain [90].
It is recommended that adult patients with mastalgia consume a diet low in animal fats and rich in fiber to improve treatment efficacy [91].
GPP BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comments: Restricting the intake of foods containing animal fats helps reduce mammographic density [92].
3.2 Pharmacotherapy
The obstetrician-gynecologist prescribes therapy only to patients with diffuse forms of benign breast disease (BBD).
The use of micronized progesterone preparations (ATC - Progestogens) is recommended for patients with BBD to relieve cyclic mastalgia [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [183].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: Clinical studies of the transdermal route of administration of micronized progesterone (ATC - Progestogens) have demonstrated a reduction in breast tension and tenderness, regression of cysts according to breast ultrasound and mammography, and a decrease in mammographic density [82], [94], [95], [100], [101], [99], [102], [103].
It is recommended to use Vitex agnus-castus fruit extract or Mastodynon (INN not established) in the complex therapy of adult patients with BBD to relieve cyclic mastalgia [105], [107], [108], [184].
Level of Evidence BLevel of Confidence 2Level of recommendation B (level of evidence – 2).
Comments: These medications lead to the regression of pathological processes in the breast tissue [104], [114].
Indole-3-carbinol-based preparations are recommended for adult women for the treatment of cyclic mastalgia in BBD [110], [111], [112], [113], [177].
GCR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: Treatment with indole-3-carbinol is accompanied by a reduction in breast pain and swelling, as well as a decrease in the number and/or size of breast cysts [110], [111], [112], [113], [177].
The use of antiestrogens (#Tamoxifen** 10 mg once daily orally for 3–6 months) is recommended for the relief of mastalgia in adult patients with BBD as a second-line therapy or in case of a high risk of breast cancer [115], [116].
GGR BLOC 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1).
Comments: The use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system - antiestrogens) allows a therapeutic effect to be achieved in 75%–97% of patients with severe mastalgia. However, due to frequent side effects (hot flashes, excessive sweating, nausea, dizziness, vaginal dryness, thrombophlebitis, and endometrial hyperplasia), drugs from this group should be used as a second-line therapy for BBD [115], [116].
The use of dopamine receptor agonists is recommended for the treatment of mastalgia and normalization of prolactin levels [115], [170].
GGR BLOC 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 1).
Comments: The main mechanism of action of dopamine receptor agonists is the suppression of prolactin secretion via stimulation of dopamine receptors without affecting the normal levels of other pituitary hormones. The administration of bromocriptine** is accompanied by a reduction/relief of pain [54], [183].
The use of topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs (NSAIDs) is recommended for patients with severe mastalgia to relieve pain [117], [118].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: The use of NSAIDs in the treatment of various forms of mastopathy is due to the ability of drugs in this group to inhibit the synthesis of prostaglandins, which play a major role in the development of edema and venous stasis in the mammary glands. In addition, drugs from this group can be effective in the treatment of extramammary mastalgia caused by musculoskeletal disorders [117], [118]. NSAID therapy cannot be prolonged due to a high incidence of side effects affecting the gastrointestinal tract and other organs and systems.
3.3 Use of hormonal contraceptives in BBD.
It is recommended to classify BBD as Category 1 according to the National Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (2023) (a condition for which there is no restriction for the use of the contraceptive method) for the use of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) (ATC – Progestogens and estrogens, fixed combinations) [137].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: The lack of randomized trials comparing different estrogen/progestogen combinations (ATC - Progestogens and estrogens, fixed combinations) makes it impossible to highlight the advantages of any specific drug regarding its effect on the risk of developing BBD. In women with an average population risk of breast cancer, a slight increase in breast cancer risk is noted with increasing duration of CHC use. Every additional 10 years of CHC use is associated with a significant 14% increase in breast cancer risk (95% CI: 1.05–1.23) [140]. In women with a family history of breast cancer and pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, the risk of breast cancer with CHC use corresponds to the general population risk [137], [141]. The use of progestogen-only contraceptives (ATC - Progestogens), regardless of the route of drug delivery, is associated with a slight increase in breast cancer risk comparable to that of CHCs [142].
It is recommended to consider unspecified breast masses as Category 2 (a condition where the advantages outweigh the theoretical or proven risks) for all types of CHCs (ATC – Progestogens and estrogens, fixed combinations), with mandatory follow-up examination and clarification of the diagnosis [137].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: This approach applies both to the initial choice and the continuation of contraception when an unspecified breast mass is detected [143], [144].
3.4 Use of MHT in benign breast diseases (BBD).
BBD is not a contraindication for prescribing MHT [145], [146].
For the majority of women, the risk of breast cancer is low and requires individual assessment in each specific case. Combined estrogen-progestogen MHT is associated with a small increase in breast cancer risk, which largely depends on the type of progestogens in the drug composition [149], [150], [151], [152], [153]. A number of studies have reported a lower risk of breast cancer development in patients who received dydrogesterone**, drospirenone (ATX: Drospirenone and estrogen) as the progestogen component of combined MHT with long-term use compared to patients who received MPA (ATX: Progestogens), NETA, LNG-IUS (ATX: Plastic progestogen-containing IUDs) as part of combined MHT [149], [150], [151], [152]. Estrogen monotherapy, tibolone, as well as micronized progesterone** as part of combined MHT in postmenopausal women are associated with no or a small increase in breast cancer risk [149], [152], [153].
During MHT use, the additional risk of breast cancer is low and is not cumulative with other risk factors (age, family history of breast cancer, genetic risk, BBD, personal breast cancer risk factors).
The risk of breast cancer increases with the duration of MHT use and decreases several years after its discontinuation [149], [152]. A confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer is an absolute contraindication for both the initiation and continuation of MHT.
3.3 Surgical Treatment
Determination of indications and contraindications for surgical treatment methods in BBD is the competence of an oncologist. Surgical treatment is carried out in oncological medical organizations.
It is recommended to perform breast resection when atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), flat epithelial hyperplasia (FEA), lobular epithelial hyperplasia (ALH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), or radial scar with atypia is confirmed by biopsy data, in order to clarify the diagnosis and treatment [119], [120].
Level CLevel 3Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 3).
It is recommended to perform surgical treatment of breast cysts in the presence of mural proliferations, pronounced proliferation of the cyst-lining epithelium and cellular atypia according to cytological examination of the micropreparation of breast tissues from the cavity contents, or hemorrhagic cyst contents [54], [120], [121], [122].
Level CLevel 3Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 3).
It is recommended to perform breast resection in patients with intraductal papilloma for its complete removal and subsequent pathomorphological examination of the breast biopsy (surgical) material [121], [123], [124].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
Specific rehabilitation for BBD has not been developed.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
5.1 Methods of general prevention of BBD
It is recommended that all patients maintain an optimal BMI to reduce the risk of BBD [2], [40], [125].
GCR CLEL 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comments: BMI ≥25 at age 18 is associated with a 33% reduction in BBD risk [171].
It is recommended to restrict products containing methylxanthines (coffee, tea, chocolate, cocoa, cola) to reduce the risk of BBD [7], [40], [185].
For adults: Recommendation grade B (Level of evidence – 3).
For children: Recommendation grade B (Level of evidence – 3).
It is recommended that all women restrict the consumption of animal fats and meat to reduce the risk of BBD [2], [92], [40].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
It is recommended that all women consume fiber-rich foods to reduce the risk of BBD [5], [7].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
It is recommended to avoid alcohol intake from menarche to the first full-term pregnancy to reduce the risk of BBD [128], [172], [173].
GPP BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3).
It is recommended that all women engage in therapeutic exercise to reduce the risk of BBD [6], [129], [171].
Level CLevel 3Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 3).
It is recommended to optimize the duration of menopausal hormone therapy in postmenopausal women receiving combined MHT to reduce the risk of developing BBD [117], [130].
Level of Evidence BLevel of Confidence 2Level of recommendation B (level of evidence – 2).
Comments: The use of combined MHT preparations containing estrogens and synthetic progestins (ATX: Progestogens) for more than 8 years increases the risk of BBD by 74%.
5.2 Methods of breast cancer prevention in high-risk BBD patients
The prescription of prophylactic drug therapy and the determination of indications for risk-reducing interventions fall within the competence of an oncologist.
It is recommended to assess breast cancer risk factors [32] (Table 5).
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended to increase physical activity for the prevention of breast cancer [6], [129].
GPP BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3).
It is recommended to limit the consumption of animal fats and meat (no more than 3 servings per day) for the prevention of breast cancer [16], [131].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
It is recommended to consume fiber-rich foods for the prevention of breast cancer [5], [7].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
It is recommended that all patients practice breastfeeding in the absence of contraindications for the prevention of BBD and breast cancer [132], [186].
GCR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: Every 12 months of breastfeeding is associated with a 4.3% reduction in the relative risk of breast cancer.
In patients with BBD older than 35 years with atypical breast hyperplasia, it is recommended to administer risk-reducing drugs (antiestrogens) to suppress proliferative activity and prevent breast cancer [30], [40].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comments: In adult women with a history of atypical breast hyperplasia, the use of #tamoxifen** at a dose of 20 mg/day for 5 years is associated with an 86% reduction in the risk of developing breast cancer [174], [175]. The use of aromatase inhibitors (#exemestane at a dose of 25 mg/day or #anastrozole** 1 mg/day) for 5 years in high-risk menopausal patients reduces breast cancer risk by 65% [30], [174], [175], [176].
Adult female carriers of pathogenic variants in the BRCA1,2 genes after discussing the benefit-risk ratio are recommended risk-reducing mastectomy (A16.20.043) with or without salpingo-oophorectomy in the presence of breast changes accompanied by pronounced hyperplasia or epithelial atypia in order to reduce breast cancer risk [30], [134], [135], [185].
GCR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comments: Risk-reducing mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk by 93% [135].
The issue of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is decided by a medical commission.
5.3 Dispensary follow-up of patients with BBD
The scope and frequency of examination for patients with BBD are regulated by current documents (clause 6.1). With BI-RADS 1, 2 results, the patient is monitored by an obstetrician-gynecologist; with BI-RADS 4, 5, 6, the patient is monitored by an oncologist; with 0, 3 – a consultation with an oncologist is required to determine further management tactics (Table 4).
It is recommended as part of preventive examination and clinical health assessment (dispanse rization) to perform mammography in two projections for women aged 40 to 75 years inclusive once every 2 years [1][2] [32], [59], [61].
Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).
Comment: A 2-year screening interval is recommended for women in the absence of breast changes, breast cancer risk factors, patient complaints, and mammographic density types A and B. With mammographic density types C and D, a shorter screening interval (1 year) and an additional imaging method available at the specific medical facility (MRI, digital breast tomosynthesis, breast ultrasound) are advisable [32], [44].
It is recommended to perform breast ultrasound as an additional clarifying diagnostic method taking into account age, especially for women under 40 years of age [126], [136].
GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).
It is recommended that women carrying pathogenic variants that increase the risk of developing breast cancer (BRCA1/2, PALB2, TP53, CDH1, PTEN) undergo selective screening for early diagnosis, including annual mammography and breast MRI starting at age 30, or 5 years younger than the age of the youngest female relative diagnosed with breast cancer in the family [134].
RG CLE 5Recommendation Grade C (Level of Evidence 5).
[1] Order of the Russian Ministry of Health dated October 20, 2020, No. 1130n “On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care in the Field of Obstetrics and Gynecology”
[2] Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 404n dated April 27, 2021
“On approval of the procedure for conducting preventive medical examination and clinical health assessment of certain groups of adults”
6. Organization of Medical Care
6.1. Organization of Outpatient and Inpatient Care.
Since certain forms of BBD are associated with an increased risk of developing breast cancer, optimizing the diagnosis and management tactics for women with BBD is part of the strategy to reduce breast cancer incidence.
Medical care for women aimed at detecting breast diseases is provided by an obstetriciangynaecologist. The direct responsibilities of an obstetriciangynaecologist include risk assessment and early detection of both benign and malignant breast diseases, as well as the provision of specialized care for benign breast diseases (BBD), including therapeutic and preventive approaches [1]. Following breast cancer risk assessment, physical examination, and instrumental workup, further routing of the patient is determined based on the risk category and the findings of imaging techniques according to the BI-RADS classification [59, 61]. Women with identified cystic and nodular breast changes are referred to an oncological dispensary for diagnosis verification.
Invasive diagnostic procedures are performed by an oncologist [2]. An indication for hospitalization is the impossibility of treatment and examination in an outpatient setting.
When benign breast diseases are detected, women are under dispensary observation (clinical follow-up) by an obstetriciangynaecologist, who provides treatment taking into account concomitant gynaecological pathology.
[1] Order of the Russian Ministry of Health dated October 20, 2020, No. 1130n “On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care in the Field of Obstetrics and Gynecology”
[2] Order of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 360n dated June 2, 2021, "On Approval of the Professional Standard 'Oncologist'"
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria | Evaluation of compliance Yes/No |
|---|---|---|
1. | Breast inspection and palpation performed | |
2. | Breast ultrasound and/or mammography performed (with a conclusion according to the BI-RADS and ACR (A-D) classifications) | |
3. | Additional patient examination prescribed (breast ultrasound, contrast-enhanced breast MRI, or breast tomosynthesis) in case of high mammographic density C and D | |
4. | Medical therapy prescribed to patients with BBD for the relief of mastalgia | |
5. | Mammography performed in the presence of nodular lesions in the breasts | |
6. | Patient referred for a consultation with an oncologist in the presence of signs or suspicion of a malignant neoplasm (BI-RADS 4-5) |
References
Show references
Kaprin A. D., Rozhkova N. I. Mammology: National Guidelines // M.: Geotar-Media. – 2016., GEOTAR-Med. Moscow.
Early life factors and incidence of proliferative benign breast disease // Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers. – 2005. – Vol. 14. – No. 12.
Berkey C. S. et al. Prospective study of growth and development in older girls and risk of benign breast disease in young women // Cancer. – 2011. – Vol. 117. – No. 8. – P. 1612-1620.
Baer H. J. et al. Adolescent diet and incidence of proliferative benign breast disease // Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers. – 2003. – Vol. 12. – No. 11. – P. 1159-1167.
Su X. et al. Intake of fiber and nuts during adolescence and incidence of proliferative benign breast disease // Cancer Causes & Control. – 2010. – Vol. 21. – No. 7. – P. 1033-1046.
Jung M. M. et al. Lifetime physical activity and the incidence of proliferative benign breast disease // Cancer Causes & Control. – 2011. – Vol. 22. – No. 9. – P. 1297.
Ader D. N. et al. Cyclical mastalgia: prevalence and associated health and behavioral factors // Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. – 2001. – Vol. 22. – No. 2. – P. 71-76.
Rohan T. E., Miller A. B. Hormone replacement therapy and risk of benign proliferative epithelial disorders of the breast // European Journal of Cancer Prevention: The Official Journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP). – 1999. – Vol. 8.
O’Connell P. et al. Analysis of loss of heterozygosity in 399 premalignant breast lesions at 15 genetic loci // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. – 1998. – Vol. 90. – No. 9. – P. 697-703.
Hoogerbrugge-van der Linden N. et al. High prevalence of premalignant lesions in prophylactically removed breasts from women at hereditary risk for breast cancer. – 2003.
Bespalov V. G., Travina M. L. Fibrocystic breast disease and breast cancer risk (literature review) // Tumors of the Female Reproductive System. – 2015. – No. 4.
Ghosh K., Vierkant R.A. et al. Association between mammographic breast density and histologic features of benign breast disease. Breast Cancer Res. 2017.
Brinton L.A. Vessey M.P., Flavel R., et al. Risk factors for benign breast disease. Am J Epidemiol 1981;113:203–14.
Prilepskaya V. N., Shvetsova O. B. Benign breast diseases: principles of therapy. A guide for the practicing physician // Gynecology. – 2000. – Vol. 2. – No. 6. – P. 201-204.
Radzinsky V. E. Breasts and Gynaecological Diseases. – 2010.
Silvera S. A. N., Rohan T. E. Benign proliferative epithelial disorders of the breast: a review of the epidemiologic evidence // Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. – 2008. – Vol. 110. – No. 3. – P. 397-409.
Dyrstad S. W. et al. Breast cancer risk associated with benign breast disease: systematic review and meta-analysis // Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. – 2015. – Vol. 149. – No. 3. – P. 569-575.
Onstad M., Stuckey A. Benign breast disorders // Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics. – 2013. – Vol. 40. – No. 3. – P. 459-473.
Mendell L., Rosenbloom M., Naimark A. Are breast patterns a risk index for breast cancer? A reappraisal // American Journal of Roentgenology. – 1977. – Vol. 128. – No. 4. – P. 547-547.
Boyd N. F. et al. Bias and the association of mammographic parenchymal patterns with breast cancer // British Journal of Cancer. – 1982. – Vol. 45. – No. 2. – P. 179.
Brisson J., Morrison A. S., Khalid N. Mammographic parenchymal features and breast cancer in the breast cancer detection demonstration project // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. – 1988. – Vol. 80. – No. 19. – P. 1534-1540.
Janzon L., Andersson I., Petersson H. Mammographic patterns as indicators of risk of breast cancer. A cross-sectional population study // Radiology. – 1982. – Vol. 143. – No. 2. – P. 417-419.
Byrne C. et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status // JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. – 1995. – Vol. 87. – No. 21. – P. 1622-1629.
Fitzgibbons P. L., Henson D. E., Hutter R. V. P. Benign breast changes and the risk for subsequent breast cancer: an update of the 1985 consensus statement // Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. – 1998. – Vol. 122. – No. 12. – P. 1053.
Smith R. L., Pruthi S., Fitzpatrick L. A. Evaluation and management of breast pain // Mayo Clinic Proceedings. – Elsevier, 2004. – Vol. 79. – No. 3. – P. 353-372.
Noroozian M. et al. Long-term clinical outcomes in women with breast pain in the absence of additional clinical findings: mammography remains indicated // Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. – 2015. – Vol. 149. – No. 2. – P. 417-424.
Plu-Bureau G. et al. Cyclical mastalgia and breast cancer risk: results of a French cohort study // Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers. – 2006. – Vol. 15. – No. 6. – P. 1229-1231.
Mastopathies / [Andreeva E. N., Bozhenko V. K., Burdina I. I. et al.]; edited by A. D. Kaprin, N. I. Rozhkova. - Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2019.
Savelieva G. M. et al. National Guidelines // Obstetrics. – M.: Geotar-Media. – 2015.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Breast Cancer Risk Reduction. Version 1.2024 – October 31, 2023.
Ngo C., Seror J., Chabbert-Buffet N. Breast pain: recommendations // Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction. – 2015. – Vol. 44. – No. 10. – P. 938-946.
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Version 3.2023 — October 31, 2023.
C. Ngô, J. Seror, and N. Chabbert-Buffet, “Breast pain: Recommendations,” J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris)., vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 938–946, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.039.
G. Page, “NCCN Guidelines for Breast Cancer V . 1 . 2023 – Annual on 10 / 28 / 22,” pp. 21–23, 2023.
Gorins A., Cordray J. P. Hormonal profile of benign breast disease and premenstrual mastodynia // European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology. – 1984. – Vol. 5. – No. 1. – P. 1-10.
Mancini A. et al. Endocrine evaluation of patients with benign lumps of the breast // Cancer Detection and Prevention. – 1992. – Vol. 16. – No. 1. – P. 27-30.
Lauby-Secretan B. et al. Breast-cancer screening—viewpoint of the IARC Working Group // New England Journal of Medicine. – 2015. – Vol. 372. – No. 24. – P. 2353-2358.
Speroff L., Fritz M. A. (ed.). Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility. – lippincott Williams & wilkins, 2011.
Smetnik V. P., Tumilovich L. G. Non-Operative Gynecology. – Medical Information Agency, 2006. .
Diagnosis and management of benign breast disorders. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists., Obstetrics & Gynecology., no. 127(6), pp. 141–156, 2016.
Rozhkova N. I. X-Ray Diagnostics of Breast Diseases. – 1993., Meditsina. Moscow.
Henderson T. O. et al. Systematic review: surveillance for breast cancer in women treated with chest radiation for childhood, adolescent, or young adult cancer // Annals of Internal Medicine. – 2010. – Vol. 152. – No. 7. – P. 444-455.
Abdullah P, Alabousi M et al. Synthetic 2D Mammography Versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021.
Alabousi M, Zha N et al. Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2020.
Labazanova P. G., Budanova M. V. et al. Mammographic density as a marker of increased risk for breast cancer development. Medical Alphabet. 2021.
Methodological recommendations on the use of the BI-RADS system in mammographic examination / Methodological recommendations edited by Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Corresponding Member of RAS, Honored Scientist of the RF, A. Yu. Vasiliev. — Moscow. — 2017.
Buchberger W. et al. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup // AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology. – 1999. – Vol. 173. – No. 4. – P. 921-927.
Yakobs O. E., Rozhkova N. I., Kaprin A. D. Capabilities of sonoelastography in the differential diagnosis of breast diseases accompanied by microcalcification clusters // Obstetrics and Gynecology: News. Opinions. Training. – 2017. – No. 1 (15).
Yakobs, O. E. Optimization of early diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer based on the integration of digital radiological technologies // Author's abstract of a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Medical Sciences, 2019.
Catalano O. et al. Additional role of colour Doppler ultrasound imaging in intracystic breast tumours // La Radiologia Medica. – 2009. – Vol. 114. – No. 2. – P. 253.
Itoh A. et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis // Radiology. – 2006. – Vol. 239. – No. 2. – P. 341-350.
Weismann C., Mayr C., Egger H., and Auer A. Breast Sonography - 2D, 3D, 4D Ultrasound or Elastography? Breast Care (Basel)., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 98–103, 2011, doi: 10.1159/000327504.
Lehman C. D. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital screening mammography with and without computer-aided detection //JAMA internal medicine. – 2015. – Vol. 175. – No. 11. – P. 1828-1837.
Serov V. N. et al. Guide to outpatient care in obstetrics and gynecology // M.: GEOTAR-Media. – 2016., GEOTAR-Med. Moscow.
Serov V. N., Sukhikh G. T. Clinical Guidelines. Obstetrics and Gynecology // M: GEOTAR-Media. – 4th ed. – 2017. Moscow: Problemy Reproduktsii.
Heywang-Köbrunner S. H. et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions //European journal of radiology. – 1997. – Vol. 24. – No. 2. – P. 94-108.
Kriege M. et al. Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition //New England Journal of Medicine. – 2004. – Vol. 351. – No. 5. – P. 427-437.
Korzhenkova G. P. Diagnostic value of BI-RADS categories in the management of patients with benign breast pathology //Tumors of the female reproductive system. – 2016. – No. 4.
Adamyan L.V., Rodionov V.V., Sheshko E.L., Dolgushina N.V. Benign breast dysplasia from the BI-RADS perspective: a modern view of the problem. Problems of Reproduction. 2023.
ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas; BI-RADS. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology.// American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR-BI-RADS®--5th Edition., 2014.
Adamyan L.V., Kotova E.G., Rodionov V.V., Protasova A.E., Sheshko E.L. The role of the gynecologist in detecting breast pathology and associated hyperproliferative disorders. Problems of Reproduction. 2023.
Harvey J. A. et al. Short-term follow-up of palpable breast lesions with benign imaging features: evaluation of 375 lesions in 320 women //American Journal of Roentgenology. – 2009. – Vol. 193. – No. 6. – P. 1723-1730.
Patterson S. K. et al. Outcomes of solid palpable masses assessed as BI-RADS 3 or 4A: a retrospective review //Breast cancer research and treatment. – 2014. – Vol. 147. – No. 2. – P. 311-316.
Graf O. et al. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? //Radiology. – 2004. – Vol. 233. – No. 3. – P. 850-856.
Shin J. H. et al. Probably benign breast masses diagnosed by sonography: is there a difference in the cancer rate according to palpability? //American journal of roentgenology. – 2009. – Vol. 192. – No. 4. – P. W187-W191.
Huff J. G. The sonographic findings and differing clinical implications of simple, complicated, and complex breast cysts //Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. – 2009. – Vol. 7. – No. 10. – P. 1101-1105.
Daly C. P. et al. Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy? //Academic radiology. – 2008. – Vol. 15. – No. 5. – P. 610-617.
Venta L. A. et al. Management of complex breast cysts //AJR. American journal of roentgenology. – 1999. – Vol. 173. – No. 5. – P. 1331-1336.
Doshi D. J. et al. Complex cystic breast masses: diagnostic approach and imaging-pathologic correlation //Radiographics. – 2007. – Vol. 27. – No. suppl_1. – P. S53-S64.
Guray M., Sahin A.A. Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and management. Oncologist. 2006 May;11(5):435-49.
Shetty M. K., Shah Y. P. Prospective evaluation of the value of negative sonographic and mammographic findings in patients with palpable abnormalities of the breast //Journal of ultrasound in medicine. – 2002. – Vol. 21. – No. 11. – P. 1211-1220.
Moy L. et al. Specificity of mammography and US in the evaluation of a palpable abnormality: retrospective review //Radiology. – 2002. – Vol. 225. – No. 1. – P. 176-181.
Leung S. E., Ben-Nachum I., Kornecki A. New Palpable Breast Lump With Recent Negative Mammogram: Is Repeat Mammography Necessary? //American Journal of Roentgenology. – 2016. – Vol. 207. – No. 1. – P. 200-204.
Garifullova Yu. V. Radiation diagnostic methods for benign breast diseases //Practical Medicine. – 2017. – No. 7 (108).
Hussain A. N., Policarpio C., Vincent M. T. Evaluating nipple discharge //Obstetrical & gynecological survey. – 2006. – Vol. 61. – No. 4. – P. 278-283.
Jain A. et al. Management of nipple discharge: technology chasing application //The breast journal. – 2010. – Vol. 16. – No. 4. – P. 451-452.
Tokuda Y, Kuriyama K, Nakamoto A, Choi S, Yutani K, Kunitomi Y, Haneda T, Kawai M, Masuda N, Takeda M, Nakamura H. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 Jan-Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181671ad2. PMID: 19188786.
Ballesio L. et al. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral nipple discharge: preliminary study //La radiologia medica. – 2008. – Vol. 113. – No. 2. – P. 249-264.
Ashfaq A. et al. Validation study of a modern treatment algorithm for nipple discharge //The American Journal of Surgery. – 2014. – Vol. 208. – No. 2. – P. 222-227.
Abati A., Simsir A. Breast fine needle aspiration biopsy: prevailing recommendations and contemporary practices //Clinics in laboratory medicine. – 2005. – Vol. 25. – No. 4. – P. 631-654.
P. Levine, A. Simsir, and J. Cangiarella, “Management Issues in Breast Lesions Diagnosed by Fine-Needle Aspiration and Percutaneous Core Breast Biopsy,” Pathol. Patterns Rev., vol. 125, no. suppl_1, pp. S124–S134, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1309/ADTMEE684PN89DQG.
Rosolowich V. et al. Mastalgia //Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. – 2006. – Vol. 28. – No. 1. – P. 49-57.
B. R. Mason, K.-A. Page, and K. Fallon, Mason B. R., Page K. A., Fallon K. An analysis of movement and discomfort of the female breast during exercise and the effects of breast support in three cases //Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. – 1999. – Vol. 2. – No. 2. – P. 134-144.
Yeow K. M. et al. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy as an initial diagnostic test for palpable breast masses //Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. – 2001. – Vol. 12. – No. 11. – P. 1313-1317.
Egyed Z. et al. Radial scar-significant diagnostic challenge //Pathology & Oncology Research. – 2008. – Vol. 14. – No. 2. – P. 123.
Murshid K. R. A review of mastalgia in patients with fibrocystic breast changes and the non-surgical treatment options //Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences. – 2011. – Vol. 6. – No. 1. – P. 1-18.
Fox H. et al. Are patients with mastalgia anxious, and does relaxation therapy help? //The Breast. – 1997. – Vol. 6. – No. 3. – P. 138-142.
Barros A. C. S. D. et al. Reassurance in the treatment of mastalgia //The breast journal. – 1999. – Vol. 5. – No. 3. – P. 162-165.
Rodionov V. V., Smetnik A. A. Benign breast diseases //Obstetrics and Gynecology: News. Opinions. Training. – 2018. – No. 1 (19).
Faiz O., Fentiman I. S. Management of breast pain //International journal of clinical practice. – 2000. – Vol. 54. – No. 4. – P. 228-232.
Goodwin P. J. et al. Elevated high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and dietary fat intake in women with cyclic mastopathy //American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. – 1998. – Vol. 179. – No. 2. – P. 430-437.
Boyd N. F. et al. Effects at two years of a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet on radiologic features of the breast: results from a randomized trial //Journal of the National Cancer Institute. – 1997. – Vol. 89. – No. 7. – P. 488-496.
Winkler U. H. et al. Cyclic progestin therapy for the management of mastopathy and mastodynia //Gynecological Endocrinology. – 2001. – Vol. 15. – No. sup6. – P. 37-43.
Meskikh E. V., Rozhkova N. I. Use of Progestogel in diffuse forms of mastopathy //Tumors of the female reproductive system. – 2012. – No. 1.
KOGAN I. Yu., Musina E. V. Local application of micronized progesterone in reproductive-age patients with mastopathy //Obstetrics and Gynecology. – 2012. – No. 2. – P. 102-106.
Protasova A.E., Andreeva E.N. et al. Dynamics of clinical symptoms of fibrocystic breast disease during treatment with transdermal micronized progesterone gel: results of the Russian multicenter observational study BREST. Obstetrics and Gynecol.
Andreeva E.N., Rozhkova N.I. Efficacy of transdermal gel containing micronized progesterone in the treatment of fibrocystic breast disease (FCBD). Results of a Russian study. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016.
Protasova A.E. Dynamics of clinical symptoms of fibrocystic breast disease during monotherapy with transdermal micronized progesterone: results of the multicenter cohort study BREST-2. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2020.
M. Brkic et al., “The Influence of Progesterone Gel Therapy in the Treatment of Fibrocystic Breast Disease,” Open J. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 06, no. 05, pp. 334–341, 2016, doi: 10.4236/ojog.2016.65042.
Vysotskaya I.V., Letyagin V.P., Laktionov K.P. Diagnosis and treatment of benign breast diseases (clinical guidelines of the Russian Association of Oncological Mammologists). Tumors of the female reproductive system. 2014:19-32.
J. S. Kaiser, M. A. Helvie, R. L. Blacklaw, and M. A. Roubidoux, “Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection.,” Radiology, vol. 223, no. 3, pp. 839–844, Jun. 2002, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2233011166.
O. J. Kjartansdottir, L. G. Sigurdardottir, E. J. Olafsdottir, J. G. Jonasson, G. Ursin, and L. Tryggvadottir, “Estrogen-progestin use and breast cancer characteristics in lean and overweight postmenopausal women.,” Breast Cancer Res. Treat., vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 363–373, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4171-2.
Fentiman I.S., “The pathophysiology and therapy of benign breast disease,” Reprod. Med. Mol. Cell. Genet. Fundam., vol. 97, pp. 487–494, 2003.
Rozhkova N. I., Meskikh E. V. Use of Mastodynon in various forms of mastopathy //Tumors of the female reproductive system. 2010;3:27–34.
Mirzaee F, Fakari FR, Babakhanian M, Roozbeh N, Ghazanfarpour M. The Effectiveness of Herbal Medicines on Cyclic Mastalgia: A Systematic Review on Meta-analysis. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022 Oct;44(10):972-985. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1755456. Epub 2022 Nov 29. PMID: 36446563; PMCID: PMC9708400.
Kiselev V. I., Smetnik A. A., Smetnik V. P., et al. Experience with indole-3-carbinol in the treatment of breast diseases and prevention of breast cancer // Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 2. – P. 106-112., 2017.
Halaska M. et al. Treatment of cyclical mastalgia with a solution containing a Vitex agnus castus extract: results of a placebo-controlled double-blind study //The Breast. – 1999. – Vol. 8. – No. 4. – P. 175-181.
Ooi S.L., Watts S., McClean R., Pak S.C. Vitex Agnus-Castus for the Treatment of Cyclic Mastalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Womens Health. 2020; 29(2): 262-78.
Muyzhnek E. L. et al. Fibrosclerosis and sclerosing adenosis with microcalcifications in the breast. Molecular pathogenesis, timely diagnosis and treatment //Research’n Practical Medicine Journal. – 2019. – Vol. 6. – No. 2.
Kiselev V.I., Smetnik V.P., Suturina L.V., Selivanov S.P., Rudakova E.B., Rakhmatullina I.R. et al. Indole-3-carbinol – a method of multitarget therapy for cyclic mastodynia. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2013;7:56-62.
Smetnik A. A., Smetnik V. P., Kiselev V. I. Experience with indole-3-carbinol in the treatment of breast diseases and prevention of breast cancer //Obstetrics and Gynecology. – 2017. – No. 2. – P. 106-112.
Ashrafyan L.A., Rozhkova N.I., Prokopenko S.P., Meskikh E.V., Artymuk N.V., Belotserkovtseva L.D., Dolgushina V.F., Korotkikh N.V., Kuznetsova L.V., Kukarskaya I.I., Kononenko T.S., Marochko T.Yu., Sokolov K.A., Verbitskaya Yu.S. Effect of indolecarbinol preparation on the course of cyclic mastalgia against the background of benign breast dysplasia in routine clinical practice (AFRODITE study). Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2024; 2: 134-142.
Guseinov A.Z., Guseinov T.A., Fedorishchev V.I. Efficacy of Indinol Forto in the conservative therapy of cystic and mixed forms of fibrocystic mastopathy // Bulletin of New Medical Technologies. Electronic Edition. 2023.
Sinitsyn V. A., Rudneva T. V. Treatment of patients with fibrocystic mastopathy accompanied by pain syndrome //Ros Vestn Akush Ginekol. – 2006. – Vol. 2. – P. 1-2.
Srivastava A., Mansel R. E. , Arvind N., Prasad K., Dhar A., and Chabra A. Evidence-based management of Mastalgia: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Breast, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 503–512, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.03.003.
Sinha M. K., Barman A., Sahu S., Jha A. K., and Asharaf A. A. Tamoxifen in Mastalgia: A Meta-Analysis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Canada JOGC = J. d’obstetrique Gynecol. du Canada JOGC, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1084–1094, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.06.006.
Santen R. J., Mansel R. Benign breast disorders //New England Journal of Medicine. – 2005. – Vol. 353. – No. 3. – P. 275-285.
Colak T., Ipek T., Kanik A., Ogetman Z., Aydin S. Efficacy of topical nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in mastalgia treatment. J.Am.Coll.Surg. 2003.
Vysotskaya I. V., Letyagin V. P. Atypical breast hyperplasias //Tumors of the Female Reproductive System. – 2015. – No. 4.
Coutant C. et al. Benign proliferative breast disease with and without atypia //Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction. – 2015. – Vol. 44. – No. 10. – P. 980-995.
Foulkes R.E., Heard G., Boyce T., Skyrme R., Holland P.A., and Gateley C.A. Duct Excision is Still Necessary to Rule out Breast Cancer in Patients Presenting with Spontaneous Bloodstained Nipple Discharge. Int. J. Breast Cancer, vol. 2011, p. 495315, 2011, doi: 10.4061/2011/495315.
Vysotskaya I. V. et al. Clinical guidelines of the Russian Society of Oncomammologists on breast cancer prevention, differential diagnosis, treatment of precancerous and benign breast diseases //Tumors of the Female Reproductive System.
Li X. et al. A retrospective observational study of intraductal breast papilloma and its coexisting lesions: A real‐world experience //Cancer Medicine. – 2020.
Wu D, Shi AP, Song AL, Fan ZM. Clinical practice guidelines for intraductal papilloma: Chinese Society of breast surgery (CSBrS) practice guidelines 2021.
Kjartansdottir O. J. et al. Estrogen–progestin use and breast cancer characteristics in lean and overweight postmenopausal women //Breast cancer research and treatment. – 2017. – Vol. 163. – No. 2. – P. 363-373.
Kaiser J. S. et al. Palpable breast thickening: role of mammography and US in cancer detection //Radiology. – 2002. – Vol. 223. – No. 3. – P. 839-844.
Sukhikh G.T., Smetnik V.P., “Menopausal hormone therapy and maintaining the health of mature women. Clinical guidelines: protocols //,” Clinical guidelines (treatment protocol), p. 30, 2015.
White A. J. et al. Lifetime alcohol intake, binge drinking behaviors, and breast cancer risk //American journal of epidemiology. – 2017. – Vol. 186. – No. 5. – P. 541-549.
Dixon-Suen S.C., Lewis S.J., Martin R.M. on behalf of the Breast Cancer Association Consortium, et al. Physical activity, sedentary time and breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomisation studyBritish Journal of Sports Medicine 2022.
Yenen M.C. et al. Hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women with benign fibrocystic mastopathy // Climacteric. – 2003. – No. 6(2). – P. 146-150.
Lubin F. et al. Nutritional factors associated with benign breast disease etiology: a case-control study //The American journal of clinical nutrition. – 1989. – Vol. 50. – No. 3. – P. 551-556.
Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer et al. Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52 705 women with breast cancer and 108 411 women without breast cancer. Lancet. 1997; 350: 1047-1059.
Matteo Lazzeroni et all. Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Tamoxifen to Prevent Recurrence in Breast Noninvasive Neoplasia: A 10-Year Follow-Up of TAM-01 Study. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.22.02900 Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, no. 17 (June 10, 2023.
Sessa C., Balmaña J., Bober S.L., Cardoso M.J., Colombo N., et al. Risk reduction and screening of cancer in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. Annals of Oncology. 2023; 34(1): 33-47.
De Felice F. et al. Bilateral risk-reduction mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: a meta-analysis //Annals of surgical oncology. – 2015. – Vol. 22. – No. 9. – P. 2876-2880.
Loving V. A. et al. Targeted ultrasound in women younger than 30 years with focal breast signs or symptoms: outcomes analyses and management implications //American Journal of Roentgenology. – 2010. – Vol. 195. – No. 6. – P. 1472-1477.
Sukhikh G.T., Prilepskaya V.N., Aganezova N.V., Andreeva E.N., Baranov I.I., “National medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use,” Adapted document “WHO Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 5th edition, 2015”, 2023.
R. T. Burkman, “Oral contraceptives: current status.,” Clin. Obstet. Gynecol., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 62–72, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.1097/00003081-200103000-00010.
A. E. Schindler, “Non-contraceptive benefits of oral hormonal contraceptives.,” Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2013, doi: 10.5812/ijem.4158.
H. Zhu, X. Lei, J. Feng, and Y. Wang, “Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.,” Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Heal. care Off. J. Eur. Soc. Contracept., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 402–414, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.3109/13625187.2012.715357.
P. G. Moorman et al., “Oral contraceptives and risk of ovarian cancer and breast cancer among high-risk women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.,” J. Clin. Oncol. Off. J. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol., vol. 31, no. 33, pp. 4188–4198, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.9021.
D. Fitzpatrick, K. Pirie, G. Reeves, J. Green, and V. Beral, “Combined and progestagen-only hormonal contraceptives and breast cancer risk: A UK nested case-control study and meta-analysis.,” PLoS Med., vol. 20, no. 3, p. e1004188, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004188.
2015. WHO, “Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use.”
Curtis K. M. et al. US medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016. – 2016.
K. Wang, F. Li, L. Chen, Y.-M. Lai, X. Zhang, and H.-Y. Li, “Change in risk of breast cancer after receiving hormone replacement therapy by considering effect-modifiers: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 46, pp. 81109–81124, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.20154.
Román M. et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer prognostic characteristics: a linkage between nationwide registries //Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers. – 2016. – Vol. 25. – No. 11. – P. 1464-1473.
Sukhikh G. T. et al. Menopausal hormone therapy and maintaining the health of mature women. Clinical guidelines: protocols //Clinical guidelines (treatment protocol)./G.T. Sukhikh, V.P. Smetnik, E.N. Andreeva− M. – 2015. – P. 30.
“The 2022 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society.,” Menopause, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 767–794, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002028.
J.-S. Yuk, “Relationship between menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer: A nationwide population-based cohort study.,” Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. Off. organ Int. Fed. Gynaecol. Obstet., Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15461.
A. Fournier, F. Berrino, and F. Clavel-Chapelon, “Unequal risks for breast cancer associated with different hormone replacement therapies: results from the E3N cohort study.,” Breast Cancer Res. Treat., vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 103–111, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9523-x.
R. L. Prentice et al., “Estrogen plus progestin therapy and breast cancer in recently postmenopausal women.,” Am. J. Epidemiol., vol. 167, no. 10, pp. 1207–1216, May 2008, doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn044.
Y. Vinogradova, C. Coupland, and J. Hippisley-Cox, “Use of hormone replacement therapy and risk of breast cancer: nested case-control studies using the QResearch and CPRD databases.,” BMJ, vol. 371, p. m3873, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3873.
N. Colacurci, D. Mele, P. De Franciscis, V. Costa, N. Fortunato, and L. De Seta, “Effects of tibolone on the breast.,” Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 235–238, Oct. 1998, doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(98)00129-8.
Liu Y. et al. Intakes of alcohol and folate during adolescence and risk of proliferative benign breast disease //Pediatrics. – 2012. – Vol. 129. – No. 5. – P. e1192-e1198.
Frazier A. L., Rosenberg S. M. Preadolescent and adolescent risk factors for benign breast disease //Journal of Adolescent Health. – 2013. – Vol. 52. – No. 5. – P. S36-S40.
Cui Y. et al. Menstrual and reproductive history, postmenopausal hormone use, and risk of benign proliferative epithelial disorders of the breast: a cohort study //Breast cancer research and treatment. – 2009. – Vol. 114. – No. 1. – P. 113-120.
Lauby-Secretan B. et al. Body fatness and cancer—viewpoint of the IARC Working Group //New England Journal of Medicine. – 2016. – Vol. 375. – No. 8. – P. 794-798.
Heinemann K. et al. Benign gynecological tumors: estimated incidence: results of the German Cohort Study on Women’s Health //European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. – 2003. – Vol. 107. – No. 1. – P. 78-80.
R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, and A. Jemal, “Cancer Statistics, 2017.,” CA. Cancer J. Clin., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 7–30, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.3322/caac.21387.
Ritte R. et al. Height, age at menarche and risk of hormone receptor‐positive and‐negative breast cancer: A cohort study //International journal of cancer. – 2013. – Vol. 132. – No. 11. – P. 2619-2629.
Eliassen A. H. et al. Endogenous steroid hormone concentrations and risk of breast cancer among premenopausal women //Journal of the National Cancer Institute. – 2006. – Vol. 98. – No. 19. – P. 1406-1415. .
Kerlikowske K. et al. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk //Journal of the National Cancer Institute. – 2007. – Vol. 99. – No. 5. – P. 386-395.
Qu X. et al. Bone mineral density and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women //Breast cancer research and treatment. – 2013. – Vol. 138. – No. 1. – P. 261-271.
Kaaks R. et al. Serum sex steroids in premenopausal women and breast cancer risk within the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) //Journal of the National Cancer Institute. – 2005. – Vol. 97. – No. 10. – P. 755-765.
Hormones T. E. et al. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies //The lancet oncology. – 2010. – Vol. 11. – No. 6. – P. 530-542.
Gunter M. J. et al. Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women //Journal of the National Cancer Institute. – 2009. – Vol. 101. – No. 1. – P. 48-60.
Nichols H. B. et al. Declining incidence of contralateral breast cancer in the United States from 1975 to 2006 //Journal of Clinical Oncology. – 2011. – Vol. 29. – No. 12. – P. 1564.
Kuchenbaecker K. B. et al. Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers //Jama. – 2017. – Vol. 317. – No. 23. – P. 2402-2416.
Gram I. T. et al. Smoking and risk of breast cancer in a racially/ethnically diverse population of mainly women who do not drink alcohol: the MEC Study //American journal of epidemiology. – 2015. – Vol. 182. – No. 11. – P. 917-925.
Fachi M.M., de Deus Bueno L., de Oliveira D.C., da Silva L.L., Bonetti A.F. Efficacy and safety in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021 Dec;46(6):1549-1556. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.13460. Epub 2021 Jun 16. PMID: 34137053.
Baer H.J., Schnitt S.J., Connolly J.L., Byrne C., Willett W.C., Rosner B., et al. Early life factors and incidence of proliferative benign breast disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005; 14(12):2889–2897.
Berkey C.S., Willet W.C., Frazier A.L. Prospective study of adolescent alcohol consumption and risk of benign breast disease in young women. Pediatrics. 2010;125(5):1081-1087.
Liu Y., Tamimi R.M., Berkey C.S., Willet W.C. et al. Intakes of alcohol and folate during adolescence and risk of proliferative benign breast disease. Pediatrics. 2012;129(5):1192-1198.
Fisher B., Costantino J.P., Wickerham D.L., et al. Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005;97(22):1652-1662.
Vogel V.G., Costantino J.P., Wickerham D.L., et al. Update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 Trial: Preventing breast cancer Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila). 2010;3(6):696-706.
Goss P.E., Ingle J.N., Ales-Martinez J.E. et al. Exemestane for breast cancer prevention in postmenopausal women J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2011;364:2381-2391.
Ashrafyan L.A., Rozhkova N.I., Prokopenko S.P. et al. Effect of indolecarbinol preparation on the course of cyclic mastalgia against the background of benign breast dysplasia in routine clinical practice (AFRODITE study) Akusherstvo i Ginekologiya. 2024; 2: 134-142 https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2024.35
Rand T. et al. MRI of microadenomas in patients with hyperprolactinaemia //Neuroradiology. – 1996. – Vol. 38. – P. 744-746.
Gao Y, Saksena MA, Brachtel EF, terMeulen DC, Rafferty EA. How to approach breast lesions in children and adolescents. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jul;84(7):1350-64.
Lee EJ, Chang YW, Oh JH, Hwang J, Hong SS, Kim HJ. Breast Lesions in Children and Adolescents: Diagnosis and Management. Korean J Radiol. 2018 Sep-Oct;19(5):978-991. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.5.978. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
Cozzi A, Di Leo G, Houssami N, Gilbert FJ, Helbich TH, Álvarez Benito M, Balleyguier C et. al. Preoperative breast MRI positively impacts surgical outcomes of needle biopsy-diagnosed pure DCIS: a patient-matched analysis from the MIPA study. Eur Radiol. 2024 Jun;34(6):3970-3980.
Istomin A, Masarwah A, Pitkänen M, Joukainen S, Sutela A, Vanninen R, Sudah M. Galactography is not an obsolete investigation in the evaluation of pathological nipple discharge. PLoS One. 2018 Oct 8;13(10):e0204326.
Hubbard TJ, Sharma A, Ferguson DJ. Breast pain: assessment, management, and referral criteria. Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jul 30;70(697):419-420.
Höller M, Steindl H, Abramov-Sommariva D, Kleemann J, Loleit A, Abels C, Stute P. Use of Vitex agnus-castus in patients with menstrual cycle disorders: a single-center retrospective longitudinal cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):2089-2098. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
Mareti E, Vatopoulou A, Spyropoulou GA, Papanastasiou A, Pratilas GC, Liberis A, Hatzipantelis E, Dinas K. Breast Disorders in Adolescence: A Review of the Literature. Breast Care (Basel). 2021 Apr;16(2):149-155.
Chowdhury R, Sinha B, Sankar MJ, Taneja S, Bhandari N, Rollins N, Bahl R, Martines J. Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. 2015 Dec;104(467):96-113.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Leyla V. Adamyan – Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director of the V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Honored Worker of Science of Russia, Head of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine at the Russian University of Medicine, Chief Gynecologist of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the Society for Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Russian Association of Endoscopic Gynecologists, Russian Association for Endometriosis, Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Andreeva Elena Nikolaevna – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director - Director of the Institute of Reproductive Medicine, Head of the Department of Endocrine Gynecology, Professor at the Department of Endocrinology of the National Medical Research Center for Endocrinology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor at the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine of the Russian University of Medicine, President of the International Association of Obstetricians, Gynecologists and Endocrinologists, member of the Russian Association of Endocrine Gynecologists, the Russian Association for Endometriosis, the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, ROSEGM.
Anisimkova Alla Alexandrovna – Radiologist at the Breast Pathology Department of the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation
Artymuk Natalya Vladimirovna – Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology No. 2, Kemerovo State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Chief freelance specialist in obstetrics and gynecology of the Russian Ministry of Health in the Siberian Federal District, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, member ofROAG.
Ashrafyan Levon Andreevich – Deputy Director and Director of the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, President of ROSORS.
Belokrinitskaya Tatyana Evgenyevna – MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Faculty of Continuing Professional Education, Chita State Medical Academy of the Russian Ministry of Health, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Chief freelance specialist in obstetrics and gynecology of the Russian Ministry of Health in the Far Eastern Federal District (Chita), member of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, President of the Trans-Baikal Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Dolgushina Natalia Vitalievna – MD, PhD, Professor, Deputy Director for Research, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance specialist in women's reproductive health of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Presidium of the Board of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Kiselev Vladislav Ivanovich – Deputy Director of the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, DSc (Biology), Professor, Board Member of the Russian Society of Oncoreproducers (ROSORS).
Kolyadina Irina Vladimirovna – Professor of the Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RMAPO) of the Russian Ministry of Health; Leading Researcher, Oncologist at the Breast Pathology Department and Antineoplastic Drug Therapy Department, RMAPO of the Russian Ministry of Health, MD, PhD.
Kometova Vlada Vladimirovna – Head of the Oncopathology Department, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, PhD, Board Member of the Russian Association of Mammology Specialists (ROOM).
Ovsiannikova Tamara Viktorovna – MD, PhD, Professor, Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Institute of Postgraduate Education, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University).
Protasova Anna Eduardovna – MD, PhD, Professor of the Department of Oncology, North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov; Professor of the Department of Oncology, St. Petersburg State University; Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Medical Research Center named after V.A. Almazov.
Rodionov Valery Vitalievich – Head of the Breast Pathology Department, Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, MD, PhD, Board Member of the Russian Association of Mammology Specialists (ROOM), member of ROSORS.
Rozhkova Nadezhda Ivanovna – Professor, MD, PhD, Honored Scientist of the RF, Head of the National Center of Oncology of Reproductive Organs at the P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Ministry of Health of the RF, Professor of the Department of Clinical Mammology, Diagnostic Radiology and Radiation Therapy at the Faculty of Continuous Medical Education, RUDN University; President of the Russian Association of Mammologists; member of the Russian Society of Roentgenologists and Radiologists; member of the Association of Oncologists of Russia; member of ADIOR CIS and EA (Association of Directors of Centers and Institutes of Oncology and X-ray Radiology of the CIS and Eurasian countries); member of the non-profit organization "Association of Healthcare Organizers in Oncology"; member of the European Society of Radiology.
Semiglazov Vladimir Fedorovich – Head of the Scientific Department of Tumors of the Reproductive System, Head of Scientific Department – Chief Researcher of the Scientific Department of Breast Tumors, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, PhD, Professor, President of ROOM.
Sencha Alexander Nikolaevich – Head of the Medical Imaging Department, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, MD, PhD, member of the Russian Society of Roentgenologists and Radiologists (RORR).
Serova Olga Fedorovna – Chief freelance specialist of the Ministry of Health of the Moscow Region in obstetrics and gynecology, Chief Physician of the Moscow Regional Perinatal Center, MD, PhD, Professor.
Smetnik Antonina Alexandrovna – Head of the Gynecological Endocrinology Department, PhD, member of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, President of the Russian Society of Gynecological Endocrinologists and Menopause Specialists.
Suturina Larisa Viktorovna – Chief Researcher, Head of the Department of Reproductive Health Protection, Scientific Centre for Family Health and Human Reproduction Problems (Irkutsk), MD, PhD, Professor.
Uvarova Elena Vitalievna – MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the 2nd Gynecological Department (Children and Adolescents), National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Health of the RF.
Khaschenko Elena Petrovna – PhD, Leading Researcher at the 2nd Gynecological Department, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Filippov Oleg Semenovich – MD, PhD, Professor, Honored Doctor of the RF, Chief freelance obstetrician-gynecologist of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Deputy Director of the Federal Research and Clinical Center of Children and Adolescents of the FMBA of Russia, Professor of the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine at the Russian University of Medicine.
Khaschenko Elena Petrovna – PhD, Leading Researcher at the 2nd Gynecological Department, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Yureneva Svetlana Vladimirovna – Deputy Director for Research at the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, Professor of the Department of Postgraduate Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I. Kulakov of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, MD, PhD, Professor, member of the Russian Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ROAG).
Conflict of interest: none declared
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
1. Obstetrician-gynecologist.
2. Oncologist.
3. Surgeon.
4. Radiologist.
5. Ultrasound diagnostics physician.
6. Pathologist.
Table 1. Level of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Level of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definitions |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | There is only a rationale for the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion |
Table 3. Grade of Recommendation (GoR) scale for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.
The clinical guideline update mechanism provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data regarding diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation, or when justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines become available, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Provision of medical care is currently regulated by the following valid documents:
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 1130n dated October 20, 2020, “On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care in the Field of Obstetrics and Gynecology”
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 404n dated April 27, 2021, “On approval of the procedure for conducting routine medical check-ups and health screenings for certain groups of adults”
Drug name | Indications | Contraindications | Dosing regimen |
|---|---|---|---|
Indolecarbinol, 200 mg capsules | Cyclic mastalgia, incl. associated with benign breast hyperplasia. | Hypersensitivity to the components of the drug; hereditary galactose intolerance; lactase deficiency; glucose-galactose malabsorption; pregnancy; breastfeeding; children and adolescents under 18 years of age. | Oral, 200 mg (1 capsule) 2 times a day before meals for 6 months. |
Mastodynon (no INN) 1 tab * 2 times/day or 30 drops * 3 times/day | As a symptomatic agent in the treatment of premenstrual syndrome (breast tenderness), fibrocystic mastopathy. | Pregnancy; lactation period; children under 12 years of age; hypersensitivity to the components of the drug. | Oral, 1 tablet or 30 drops 2 times/day for at least 3 months. |
Progesterone in gel form (ATC - Progestogens) for external use 1%, 1 applicator dose corresponds to 2.5 g of gel and contains 0.025 g of progesterone. | Mastalgia; diffuse fibrocystic mastopathy. | Nodular forms of fibrocystic mastopathy; tumors (tumor-like formations) of the breast of unclear etiology; breast cancer monotherapy; genital cancer monotherapy; II and III trimesters of pregnancy; individual hypersensitivity to the components of the drug. | 1 application (2.5 g of gel), containing 0.025 g of progesterone, is applied to the skin of the mammary glands using the dosing applicator until completely absorbed, 1–2 times daily or in the 2nd phase (from the 16th to the 25th day) of the menstrual cycle. Treatment course is up to 3 cycles. |
Micronized progesterone** (ATC - Progestogens) | Progesterone-deficient conditions in women: fibrocystic mastopathy, etc. | Hypersensitivity to the components of the drug; deep vein thrombosis, thrombophlebitis, thromboembolic disorders (pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, stroke), intracranial hemorrhage or a history of such conditions/diseases; vaginal bleeding of unclear origin; incomplete abortion; porphyria; diagnosed or suspected malignant neoplasms of the breast and genital organs; etc. (see official instructions) | Oral, daily dose of 200 or 400 mg for 10 days (usually from the 17th to the 26th day of the cycle). |
Bromocriptine** 2.5 mg tablets | Benign breast diseases: mastalgia alone or combined with premenstrual syndrome, or benign nodular or cystic changes; benign nodular and/or cystic changes, especially fibrocystic mastopathy. | Essential and familial tremor, Huntington's chorea, severe cardiovascular diseases, arterial hypertension, arterial hypotension, endogenous psychoses, postpartum arterial hypertension, pregnancy toxicosis, hypersensitivity to ergot alkaloids, pediatric age under 15 years. | Orally 1.25–2.5 mg 2–3 times/day, with a gradual dose increase to 5–20 mg/day for 3–6 months. |
Vitex agnus-castus fruit extract | Mastalgia (mastodynia) | Individual hypersensitivity to the components of the drug; breast cancer; pituitary tumors; pregnancy; breastfeeding period; age under 18 years (data on the efficacy and safety of the drug in this age group are lacking). | Orally 1 tab. or 40 drops 1 time/day for at least 3 months, or Oral 1 tablet 1 time a day with a small amount of water for 3 months. If symptoms do not resolve within 3 months, you must consult a doctor |
#Tamoxifen**, tab. 10 mg | Fibrocystic disease with a high risk of breast cancer | Pregnancy; lactation (breastfeeding) period; hypersensitivity to tamoxifen** and/or any other ingredient of the drug, age under 18 years, concurrent use with anastrozole**. | Orally 10 mg/day, or 20 mg/day starting 10 days before the expected menstruation for 3–6 months or 30–90 consecutive days in postmenopausal women (depending on the indications, see sections 3. Treatment.. and 5. Prevention..) |
Note: The use of dietary supplements in the treatment of benign breast diseases is not recommended.
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms
Appendix B-1. Algorithm for examining patients under 30 years of age with a palpable breast mass

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms
Appendix B-1. Algorithm for examining patients under 30 years of age with a palpable breast mass

Appendix B-2. Algorithm for examining patients aged 30 years and older with a palpable breast mass

Appendix B-3. Algorithm for examining patients with nipple discharge

Appendix B-4
Options for sequential breast palpation.

Established risk factors for benign breast diseases [2], [3], [4], [8], [154], [155], [156].
Factor | Nature of impact | Published |
|---|---|---|
Early risk factors | ||
Low body fat mass in childhood and adolescence | Positive association with the risk of benign breast diseases | Baer HJ, 2005 |
Tall stature at age 10 and rapid linear growth at 10–18 years | Positive association with the risk of benign breast diseases | Berkey CS, 2017 |
Alcohol intake from menarche to first pregnancy | Positive association with the risk of benign breast diseases | Berkey, 2010 Liu Y et al., 2012 |
Animal fat, meat (≥3 servings per day) in adolescence | Positive association with the risk of benign breast diseases | Baer HJ, 2003 Frazier AL,2013 |
Risk factors at an older age | ||
MHT | Duration of menopausal hormone therapy (more than 8–15 years) is associated with an increased risk of benign breast diseases | Cui Y, 2009 Rohan TE, 1999 |
Relative risk of breast cancer depending on the severity of proliferative processes in breast tissue [16]
Proliferative processes | Tissue changes | Relative risk of breast cancer (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
Non-proliferative | Simple cysts Mild hyperplasia Papillary apocrine changes | 1,17 (0,94-1,47) |
Proliferative without atypia | Fibroadenoma Intraductal papilloma Moderate hyperplasia Sclerosing adenosis Radial scar | 1,76 (1,58-1,95) |
Atypical hyperplasia | Atypical ductal hyperplasia Atypical lobular hyperplasia | 3,93 (3,24-4,76) |
Lobular carcinoma in situ | 6,9-11 |
Differential diagnosis of breast masses [128]
Sign | Clinical features | |
|---|---|---|
Benign breast diseases | Malignant tumor | |
Consistency | Dense or elastic | Firm |
Tenderness | Frequent | None (90%) |
Margins | Regular, smooth | Irregular |
Locomotion | Mobile, movable, not fixed | Fixed to the skin or chest wall |
"Peau d'orange" skin | Unlikely | High probability |
Nipple discharge | Bilateral, non-bloody, green or yellow | Unilateral, bloody |
Nipple retraction | Absent | May be |
Established risk factors for breast cancer [17], [132], [128], [157], [158], [159], [160], [161], [162], [163], [164], [165], [166], [167], [168], [169].
Factor | Nature of impact | Published |
|---|---|---|
Age | Breast cancer risk increases with age | Siegel RL,2003 |
Female sex | Breast cancer incidence is 100 times higher in women than in men | |
White race | The incidence of newly diagnosed breast cancer is higher in white women than in black women | CDC,2012 |
Weight | Increased BMI is associated with an increased risk of postmenopausal breast cancer | Laubu-Secretan B,2016 |
Growth | Tall height is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in both pre- and postmenopausal women | Ritte R,2013 |
Estrogens | High levels of endogenous estrogens increase the risk of breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal age | Eliassen AH,2006 |
Benign breast disease, proliferative forms | Proliferative forms (especially with atypia) of benign breast disease are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer | Dyrstad SW,2015 |
Mammographic breast density | Increased mammographic density is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer | Kerlikowske K, 2007 |
Bone mineral density | Higher bone density according to densitometry is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer | Qu X, 2013 |
Androgens | Elevated testosterone levels are associated with an increased risk of breast cancer | Kaaks R,2005 |
Insulin-like growth factors | IGF1 is positively associated with breast cancer risk | Collaboration Group, 2010 |
Insulin | Hyperinsulinemia is an independent risk factor for breast cancer | Gunter MJ,2009 |
In utero diethylstilbestrol exposure | Women with in utero exposure to diethylstilbestrol have an increased risk of breast cancer at age 40 and older | Hoover RN, 2011 |
Age at menarche | Early age at menarche (13 years or younger) is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer | Ritte R, 2013 |
Age at menopause, duration of menopausal hormone therapy | The relative risk of breast cancer increases by 1.03% for each year of delayed menopause, which is comparable to the effect of the duration of menopausal hormone therapy | Collaborative Group, 1997 |
Parity and age at first childbirth | Overall, parous women have a lower risk of breast cancer by age 70 compared to nulliparous women. Having a first child at age 20 reduces the risk of breast cancer by 20% compared to nulliparous women, and at age 25 by 10%. However, having a first child at age 35 increases the risk of breast cancer by 5% compared to nulliparous women | Rosner B, 1994 |
Personal history of breast cancer | Ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer increases the risk of contralateral breast cancer | Nichols HB, 2011 |
Family history of breast cancer | Breast cancer risk significantly depends on the number of first-degree female relatives with breast cancer | Collaborative Group, 2001 |
Pathogenic variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, p53, ATM, and PTEN genes | 5–6% of breast cancers are directly related to mutations in these genes | Kuchenbaexker KB, 2017 |
Alcohol | Alcohol consumption is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer compared to non-drinkers | White AJ,2017 |
Smoking | Moderate increase in breast cancer risk among smokers | Gram IT, 2015 |
Exposure to ionizing radiation | Exposure to therapeutic radiation at an early age is associated with the risk of breast cancer | Henderson TO, 2010 |
Appendix C. Patient Information
Breast self-examination.
It is best to perform the examination on the same day of the menstrual cycle, as breast size and structure change throughout the month. The most appropriate time is on the 5th–6th day from the start of menstruation, and after the onset of menopause – on the same day of each calendar month. Perform the examination monthly, but not more often – otherwise, changes may be too subtle each time for you to notice. Perform the examination in good lighting.
When starting the self-examination, try to calm down and relax. Treat it as a routine hygienic procedure. Remember that most changes found in the breast are benign.
The examination consists of 6 steps, but with proper and consistent organization, it takes very little time.
Step one: inspection of underwear
Minor nipple discharge may go unnoticed on its surface but leave traces on the bra. Therefore, it is necessary to thoroughly inspect the bra: check for any traces of nipple discharge in the form of bloody, brown, greenish, or yellowish spots and crusts.
Step two: general appearance of the breasts
1. Strip to the waist and stand in front of a mirror. Let your arms hang loosely. Carefully examine each breast in the mirror. Check for any changes in the size, shape, and contours of the breast (one breast may be slightly larger, which is normal). Pay attention to the symmetry of both breasts, whether they are at the same level, and whether they move evenly when you raise your arms behind your head, lean forward, or turn right and left. Check for any fixation or displacement of either breast to the side (Fig. 1).
2. Raise your arms up in front of the mirror. Examine the breasts again one by one, paying attention to their upward, lateral, or downward displacement; changes in shape with localized bulging or retraction of the skin or nipple; and the appearance of fluid droplets from the nipple when squeezed with two fingers (Fig. 2).


Step three: skin condition
Is the skin elastic? Does it gather into a fold easily?
Note any color changes, redness of the entire surface or specific areas, rashes, diaper dermatitis, or changes resembling "peau d'orange". Check for any lumps, bulges, dimples or bumps, skin retraction, ulceration, and puckering.
Do not pinch breast tissue into a fold between your fingers, as its lobular structure may create a false impression of a tumor lump.
Step four: palpation in the standing position
This step is conveniently performed in the shower with soapy fingers. Examine your left breast with your right hand, and your right breast with your left hand. Palpation is performed with the pads, not the tips of the fingers, using three or four closed fingers in circular, penetrating, springy motions. The thumb does not participate in palpation. For large breasts, the opposite hand supports it.
First, a superficial exploratory palpation is performed, where the finger pads do not penetrate deep into the breast tissue, which helps detect small formations located directly under the skin. Then, deep palpation is performed, where the finger pads gradually and sequentially reach the ribs. Palpation should be carried out from the clavicle to the lower edge of the ribs and from the sternum to the axillary line, including the axillary region, where enlarged lymph nodes may be found (Fig. 3).
Step 5: Palpation in the supine position
This is the most important part of self-examination, as it is the only way to thoroughly palpate all breast tissue. Note how the breasts feel beneath your fingers and memorize these sensations.
Palpation should be performed while lying on a relatively firm, flat surface; you can place a rolled towel or a firm pillow under the breast being examined, and either extend your arm straight down by your side or raise it above your head (Fig. 4).


Two palpation methods are recommended:
1. The grid method, in which the entire surface of the anterior chest wall from the clavicle to the costal margin and the breast itself are mentally divided into small squares. Palpation is performed sequentially in each square from top to bottom, stepping through each section (Fig. 5).
2. The spiral method, in which the breast is palpated in a spiral pattern of concentrically converging circles, starting from the armpit and moving toward the nipple. The finger pads make circular movements while moving toward the nipple (Fig. 6).
Step 6: Examination of the nipple
When inspecting the nipples, check for any changes in shape and color, retraction, weeping, ulceration, or cracks. It is necessary to palpate the nipple and the subareolar region, as a tumor can be missed beneath the nipple. This area is quite sensitive in women and may cause discomfort for some.
Finally, gently grasp the nipple between your thumb and index finger and press on it, noting the nature of any discharge or the absence thereof (Fig. 7).


If you believe that noticeable changes have occurred since your last examination, you should consult a doctor immediately. Of course, a woman should never attempt to diagnose herself, let alone prescribe treatment. Even a malignant tumor can be defeated if treatment is started at an early stage. Do not put off a doctor's visit; remember that your life may depend on it.
Dietary recommendations.
Nutrition is a vital biological factor upon which the functioning of all body systems largely depends. There is even an aphorism: "You are what you eat." Indeed, women should take a responsible approach to their health, maintaining energy and a positive psycho-emotional state to handle the vast number of daily tasks they face. A sensible attitude toward your environment will help reduce the risk of breast disease, including through the careful selection of your food. The recommendations below are suggested to reduce the risk of breast disease, including cancer.
1. Avoid excess weight. To achieve and maintain a normal weight, limit your daily calorie intake and eat smaller, more frequent meals. Physical activity is a must every day, with gymnastics or workouts at least half an hour three to four times a week.
2. Reduce total fat intake to 30% of total calories. Limit saturated fat intake by reducing portions of meat, eggs, cheese, and other animal products.
3. Include at least 5 portions of diverse fresh fruits and green and yellow vegetables in your daily diet.
4. Consume more high-fiber foods, such as whole grains, legumes, fruits, and vegetables.
5. If you consume alcoholic beverages, limit your intake to 150 g of wine, 350 g of beer, or no more than 45 g of spirits per day.
6. Minimize the consumption of smoked and salted foods, as well as foods processed with nitrites.
The principles to follow to achieve the goal of maintaining health in the simplest way are straightforward. In short, they can be stated as follows:
1. Introduce dietary changes gradually by reducing portion sizes.
2. Eat more fruits and vegetables.
3. Try cooking new recipes.
4. Learn the ingredients of the foods you eat.
5. Keep count: monitor what you eat.
6. Consume an adequate amount of vegetable and fruit fiber.
7. Find substitutes for high-fat foods.
Principle No. 1: Introduce dietary changes gradually.
The main rule for ensuring lasting dietary changes is to keep things simple and make changes step by step. This process of adapting to a new diet can be compared to gradually adding less salt to your food or less sugar to your coffee. Of course, at first, you notice the difference and probably don't like it. But eventually, you will come to consider this new flavor "normal." In fact, you may miss the old-fashioned taste of fatty foods when you begin to gradually eliminate them from your diet, but this craving will not last long and will be compensated for by becoming leaner and healthier.
Most doctors and researchers agree: if changes happen slowly, there is a better chance they will become a permanent part of a person's life. For example, it will do little good for you and your family to completely eliminate cream, butter, or cheese from your diet if you are not ready for a lifestyle change. That would be a pointless and overly drastic disruption. Everything in moderation.
How do you start eating healthier? The answer is: take small steps along the way. Introduce small amounts of new vegetables into soups, stews, salads, and stir-fries. And once you get used to this new taste, you can gradually increase the amount of these ingredients in your diet each time.
Principle No. 2: Eat more fruits and vegetables.
Every woman should strive to include five, and preferably nine, servings of fruits and vegetables daily. As many women have found, you can eat more of these protective foods without gaining weight. So, what exactly is a serving? Let's look at what experts recommend based on the average amount typically eaten at one time.
A serving of fruits and vegetables:
1 medium-sized fresh fruit
3/4 cup or about 170 g of 100% juice (e.g., tomato or orange);
1 cup of raw leafy vegetables;
1/2 cup of diced or cooked fruits;
1/4 cup of dried fruit.
Here are a few ways you can prepare 5–9 servings for yourself every day. Each serving of fruits and vegetables is rich in its own unique set of biochemicals and has the potential to reduce the risk of breast disease. Most of these plant compounds are vital if we want to stay healthy. Our bodies are unable to produce significant amounts of these chemicals. To have them in sufficient quantities, we must ensure a wide variety of plant-based foods in our diet.
Here are a few examples:
Breakfast. A serving may consist of:
1 cup of orange juice;
1/2 cup of sliced bananas, strawberries, or blueberries with cereal;
a few pieces of dried apricots or 60 g of raisins;
1/2 grapefruit or another fruit.
If you usually rush out of the house without breakfast, you need to break this habit gradually. Studies show that those who skip breakfast usually make up for the missed calories later in the day by bingeing on high-fat foods. You need to find time in your schedule for your daily 5–9 servings of fruits and vegetables.
Snack (any time of day). A serving may consist of fruit—such as a small bunch of grapes, an apple, a pear, an orange, or a tangerine. Try carrying a small bag of raisins or 100 g of carrot sticks with you to work. This amount of fruits and vegetables can count as a serving. Or can you double the portion sometimes? If you feel like it, eat an orange or an apple. This adds only a few calories, which is nothing compared to eating two pies or two slices of fatback.
Lunch. This is a great time to have a serving of fruits and vegetables. Make it a rule to have a green salad or a fresh cabbage, carrot, and onion salad with lunch. Make a fresh vegetable salad with sliced red radishes, tomatoes, cucumbers, and julienned red, green, or yellow bell peppers. You can serve hot vegetables in any combination; for example, try stewing zucchini, corn, and tomatoes with basil. You can add various spices, herbs, fat-free dressings, and condiments to enhance the flavor of the vegetables.
Desserts. Add fresh fruit to fat-free yogurt or kefir. You can make any combination of fresh fruits mixed with a small amount of fruit juice. Prepare this fruit salad half an hour before lunch.
Juices. Any attempt to extract only the juice from a combination of fruits and/or vegetables usually leads to a significant loss of nutrients and biochemicals. Considering that plant foods possess health-promoting properties, such a loss of fiber and biochemicals is undesirable. Obviously, it is preferable to drink juices with pulp. The absence of nutritious vegetable or fruit pulp, valuable fiber, and biochemicals deprives fruits and vegetables of their value.
Principle No. 3: Try cooking new recipes.
The first step in discovering new recipes and subsequently incorporating them into your lifestyle is to understand the difference between relatively healthy and unhealthy foods. Generally, the more butter, cream, or vegetable oil a recipe requires, the more likely it is that fats constitute the bulk of the calories.
Most cookbooks report the grams of fat contained in a single serving of a dish. Make it a rule to always find this information. Naturally, the lower the total fat content, the better. In recipes for a cancer-risk-reduction diet, vegetables, fruits, and grains should occupy a significant place, while meat should take up a relatively small one.
There is no need to sacrifice pleasure for good health. Food is one of life's true joys. No one wants to feel deprived or eat food that tastes like cardboard. In most vegetable-based recipes, you can easily substitute ingredients if, for example, you dislike a certain type of plant food.
Principle No. 4: Consume the right amount of fiber.
Fiber is much more than just vegetables passing undigested through the intestines. It is an active mass that eliminates active estrogen and other harmful substances from our bodies. Consuming vitamins and mineral salts may not yield the desired effect if you eat more than 35 g of fiber per day. What does consuming this amount of fiber daily mean? To answer this question, it is necessary to determine which foods contain fiber.
A few examples of high-fiber foods
Product | Fiber content, g |
|---|---|
Raisins (3/4 cup) "Real" bread Spinach paste (1 cup) Potatoes for the obese Noodles Navy bean soup (285 g can) Lentil soup Baked potato in skins (large) Boiled corn (1/2 cup) Dried figs Apple with skin (large) or pear Orange (medium) Popcorn (3 cups) Beans (3/4 cup) | 5,0 6,0 5,2 8,0 5,3 11,0 5,9 4,2 3,1 5,3 4,7 3,1 3,9 14,2 |
If you increase your intake of fruits, vegetables, and grains, your fiber intake will also increase. For example, 5–9 daily servings of any fruits and vegetables will add several grams of fiber to your diet. In fact, any inclusion of bran bread or beans in your daily diet will easily raise your daily fiber intake to the required level of 25–30 g. However, you must be careful. It is especially important to introduce fiber into your diet gradually. Excess fiber is often combined with intestinal gas production, leading to bloating or indigestion. Constipation may also sometimes occur, especially if high-fiber foods are washed down with an inadequate amount of fluid. However, there is no need to worry. The intestinal bacteria responsible for these side effects gradually adapt to the increased amount of fiber, and the unpleasant symptoms will soon decrease or disappear entirely.
Principle No. 5: Find substitutes for fatty foods.
The substitution principle can be successfully applied in many areas. Here are some examples.
Meat. Replace meat-based dishes with vegetable-based ones, or simply reduce the amount of meat in recipes. Always choose lean cuts of meat or trim visible fat. Avoid all fried foods.
Dairy products. Whenever possible, avoid whole milk products, opting for skim or 1% fat dairy products.
Vegetables. In many recipes, fat-containing ingredients can be replaced with lightly stewed or raw vegetables. They should not be overcooked or stewed with a large amount of fat.
As already mentioned, your diet is the cornerstone of the overall strategy to reduce the risk of breast diseases, including breast cancer. No other approach offers the same benefits as self-monitoring of recommended changes. These changes are simple and undemanding. You can change your diet today to prevent not only breast cancer but also other types of cancer. Dietary changes can protect your entire family from this disease.
Physical activity recommendations
Physicians have long noted a link between being overweight and an increased risk of developing breast cancer. Scientists have conducted a series of experiments that convincingly show physical exercise reduces the risk of breast cancer, and the higher the physical activity, the stronger this correlation is. Physicians have long known that physical activity acts as a deterrent to the development of breast cancer in women, but for a long time it remained unclear how strong this link is and how long the effect of exercise lasts. The experiment showed that physical activity, even at moderate loads, begins to affect the prevention of breast cancer development fairly quickly. Nevertheless, according to researchers, the disease risk decreases in direct proportion to how often and how much a woman exercises. The most physically active women showed a 20–25% reduction in breast cancer risk compared to the least active ones.
How should you prepare for workouts?
It is important to choose appropriate underwear for workouts. It should be comfortable, not compress the mammary glands, and not chafe the skin. It is best to buy underwear by trying it on to see if it will be comfortable to train in. Despite the fact that the link between underwear type and breast cancer risk has not been established, an improperly fitted bra can cause certain health problems. For example, excessive compression can provoke mastopathy, and straps that are too narrow will provide poor support for large breasts, resulting in severe back pain.
What sport to choose and how long to train?
This is not about high-intensity loads, such as weightlifting or ultra-long-distance running. Experts advise spending about 150–300 minutes a week on sports—this can be walking, dancing, swimming, or yoga. Physical activity can also include things not classically considered sports, such as walking in the park, walking the dog, gardening, and even vigorous house cleaning. You don't have to "spend" your entire workout allowance at once; you can exercise a little bit every day. This, by the way, will help reduce the likelihood of oncological diseases in general. From a breast health perspective, sports that do not involve impacts (e.g., boxing) and strong compression of the glands are suitable. Although jolts do not provoke malignant tumors in breast tissue, such injuries can lead to the development of long-lasting, often painful lumps. It is better to prefer pilates, stretching, or yoga. Aerobic and strength exercises are also suitable, for which it is best to consult a trainer or sports physician to help determine the appropriate load.
How to prepare for a prolactin blood test
1. The prolactin level is determined by a blood test taken from a vein in the morning on an empty stomach, but at least 3 hours after waking up.
2. Women are advised to take the test in the first phase of the menstrual cycle (on days 5–7). Gynecological examination and breast palpation are excluded prior to blood collection. Also, be careful with your breasts before the prolactin test—avoid injuring them.
3. The day before the test, you must abstain from sexual intercourse, visiting saunas or bathhouses, and consuming alcohol.
4. It is not recommended to take the prolactin test after a stressful situation. Therefore, in the event of psychological stress of any nature, postpone the prolactin test for at least 3–4 days.
5. It is recommended to avoid smoking for one hour before the test and to remain in a state of rest for about 15 minutes before blood collection.
6. Physical activity must be excluded the day before the test and on the day of the blood draw.
7. If you are taking any medications, you MUST inform the doctor who ordered the prolactin test. There are a number of medications that increase blood prolactin levels (hormonal contraceptives, antiemetics, most neuroleptics and tricyclic antidepressants, etc.).
It is very important to follow all guidelines when preparing for a prolactin level test. Otherwise, improper preparation for blood collection may lead to falsely elevated prolactin results, which can mislead your attending physician.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Table 4. Classification of examination results according to the BI-RADS system and recommended management [American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR-BI-RADS®--5th Edition. ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas; BI-RADS. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2014].
Classification category | Probability of breast cancer | Management tactics depending on the examination performed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mammography | ultrasound | MRI | ||
BI-RADS 0: Incomplete assessment – additional imaging evaluation needed (and/or comparison with previous mammograms in case of mammographic screening) | Not applicable | Recall for additional imaging evaluation, comparison with previous results, or both | Recall for additional imaging evaluation | Recommended as additional imaging: mammography or targeted ultrasound |
BI-RADS 1: Negative | Probability of malignancy is essentially 0% | Routine screening | Routine screening | Routine screening if the cumulative lifetime risk of breast cancer is ≥20%⃰ |
BI-RADS 2: Benign findings | Probability of malignancy is essentially 0% | Routine screening | Routine screening | Routine screening if the cumulative lifetime risk of breast cancer is ≥20%⃰ |
BI-RADS 3: Probably benign findings | Probability of malignancy >0% but ≤2% | Short-interval (6-month) follow-up with dynamic mammography | Short-interval (3–6 month) follow-up with dynamic ultrasound | Short-term (6-month) follow-up interval as indicated by the radiologist |
BI-RADS 4: Suspicious for malignancy | Probability of malignancy >2% but <95% | Mammography, breast ultrasound, possibly contrast-enhanced breast MRI to assess the extent of the process Diagnosis is established based on biopsy results | ||
BI-RADS 5: Highly suggestive of malignancy | Probability of malignancy >95% | |||
BI-RADS 6: Biopsy-proven malignancy | Not applicable | Surgical treatment if clinically indicated | ||
⃰cumulative breast cancer risk is calculated using a computer program based on the GAIL model (NCCN, 2017) (available at https://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/Default.aspx)
Table specifications:
Russian title: Classification of examination results according to the BI-RADS system and recommended management.
Source: American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR-BI-RADS®--5th Edition. ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas; BI-RADS. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2014.
Type (underline):
- rating scale
Content (template): The table consists of 3 columns: the first column contains the examination results according to the BI-RADS system, the 2nd column contains the probability of breast cancer, and the 3rd column contains the management tactics depending on the examination results (with 3 sub-items: ultrasound, mammography, MRI).
Key (interpretation): Allows determining patient management tactics based on examination results according to the BI-RADS system.
Explanations: The classification of examination results according to the BI-RADS system and recommended management are presented.