List of Abbreviations
β-hCG – beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin
AFP – alpha-fetoprotein
aPTT – activated partial thromboplastin time
OGCT – ovarian germ cell tumor
GnRH – gonadotropin-releasing hormone
HT – hormone therapy
CT – computed tomography
LDH – lactate dehydrogenase
RT – radiation therapy
PT – physical therapy
INR – international normalized ratio
MRI – magnetic resonance imaging
NEOT – non-epithelial ovarian tumors
PET-CT – positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography
RP – radiopharmaceutical
CA125 – tumor antigen 125
CDU – color duplex ultrasonography
US – ultrasound examination
CT – chemotherapy
EGD – esophagogastroduodenoscopy
HE4 – human epididymis protein 4
Terms and Definitions
Non-epithelial ovarian tumors – a heterogeneous group of malignant ovarian tumors originating from cells other than the ovarian surface epithelium.
Germ cell tumors of the ovary – rare forms of non-epithelial ovarian tumors representing a heterogeneous group of neoplasms developing from so-called "germ cells", i.e., cells involved in the formation of gonads and gametogenesis.
Dysgerminoma – the most common histological variant of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors, representing the female analogue of seminoma in males.
Non-dysgerminoma – germ cell tumors, which include yolk sac tumors, embryonal carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, polyembryoma, immature teratoma, and mixed germ cell tumor.
Sex cord-stromal tumors – constitute a heterogeneous group of tumors and differ in their ability to produce steroid hormones.
Granulosa cell tumor of the ovary – a hormone-active type of ovarian tumor originating from granulosa stromal cells.
Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors – malignant androgen-producing ovarian neoplasms composed of Sertoli cells, sex cord elements, and stromal cells structurally similar to Leydig cells of the male gonads. Most commonly seen in women of reproductive age.
Neuroendocrine tumors of the ovary – rare ovarian tumors arising from cells of the neuroendocrine system directly involved in the regulation of homeostasis via paracrine and endocrine mechanisms.
Prehabilitation – rehabilitation from the moment of diagnosis until the start of treatment (surgical treatment / chemotherapy / radiation therapy).
Stage I rehabilitation – rehabilitation during the period of specialized treatment of the underlying disease (including surgical treatment / chemotherapy / radiation therapy) in departments of medical organizations specialized in the underlying disease;
Stage II rehabilitation – rehabilitation in inpatient settings of medical organizations (rehabilitation centers, rehabilitation departments) during the early recovery period of the disease, the late rehabilitation period, and the period of residual effects of the disease.
Stage III rehabilitation – rehabilitation in the early and late rehabilitation periods, and the period of residual effects of the disease in departments (offices) of rehabilitation, physiotherapy, therapeutic exercise, reflexology, manual therapy, psychotherapy, medical psychology, speech therapy (defectology) offices providing outpatient medical care, day hospitals, as well as by mobile teams at home (including sanatorium-resort organizations).
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Non-epithelial ovarian tumors (NEOT) – a heterogeneous group of malignant ovarian tumors originating from cells other than the ovarian surface epithelium.
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
The exact etiology of NEOT remains unclear. The majority of NEOT develop from specific ovarian cells (germ cells, granulosa cells, theca cells, stromal fibroblasts, and steroid cells) [1].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
NEOT account for approximately 10% of all malignant ovarian neoplasms. Annually in Europe, 3.7 cases of ovarian germ cell tumors (OGCT) per 100,000 women and 2.1 cases of granulosa cell tumors per 1 million are registered [1, 2]. Statistical tracking of NEOT incidence is not maintained in the Russian Federation. Germ cell tumors are usually diagnosed in the first 20 years of life, whereas sex cord-stromal tumors typically occur at age 40–50 [1, 2]. Neuroendocrine tumors of the ovary occur in no more than 1% of cases, with the peak incidence in the peri- and postmenopausal period [3].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
Malignant neoplasm of ovary (C56)
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
1.5.1. International Histological Classification (WHO, 5th edition, 2020)
Stromal tumors.
Fibroma
8810/1 Cellular fibroma
8600/0 Thecoma
8601/0 Luteinized thecoma
8810/3 Fibrosarcoma
8602/0 Sclerosing stromal tumor
8590/0 Signet-ring cell stromal tumor
8590/0 Microcystic stromal tumor
8650/0 Leydig cell tumor
8760/0 Steroid cell tumor, benign
8760/3 Steroid cell tumor, malignant
Sex cord-stromal tumors:
8620/3 Adult granulosa cell tumor
8622/1 Juvenile granulosa cell tumor
8640/1 Sertoli cell tumor
8623/1 Sex cord tumor with annular tubules
Mixed sex cord-stromal tumors
8631/0 Well-differentiated Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor
8631/1 Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor
8631/1 Moderately differentiated Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor
8631/3 Poorly differentiated Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor
8633/1 Retiform Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor
8590/1 Sex cord-stromal tumors, 8632/1 Gynandroblastoma
Germ cell tumors
9060/3 Dysgerminoma
9071/3 Yolk sac tumor
9070/3 Embryonal carcinoma
9100/3 Choriocarcinoma
9080/0 Benign mature teratoma
9080/3 Immature teratoma
9085/3 Mixed malignant germ cell tumor
Monodermal teratoma / Somatic type
Tumors originating from a dermoid cyst
9090/0 Struma ovarii, benign
9090/3 Struma ovarii, malignant
9091/1 Strumal carcinoid
9084/3 Teratoma with malignant transformation
9080/0 Cystic teratoma
Germ cell tumors combined with sex cord-stromal tumors
9073/1 Gonadoblastoma
8594/1 Mixed germ cell and sex cord-stromal tumor
Neuroendocrine carcinoma
8041/3 Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma
1.5.2. Staging
Staging of ovarian tumors is performed similarly to epithelial ovarian tumors based on the results of pathological examination of surgical (biopsy) material and intraoperative surgical staging according to the FIGO (2014) and TNM (8th edition, 2017) classifications (Table 1).
Table 1. Staging of ovarian cancer according to TNM (8th edition, 2017) and FIGO (2014)
TNM | FIGO | Definition |
|---|---|---|
T1 | I | Tumor is limited to the ovaries |
T1a | IA | Tumor is limited to one ovary; capsule is intact, no tumor on ovarian surface, no malignant cells in ascites or peritoneal washings |
T1b | IB | Tumor is limited to both ovaries; capsules are intact, no tumor on ovarian surface, no malignant cells in ascites or peritoneal washings |
T1c | IC | Tumor is limited to one or both ovaries with any of the following features |
T1c1 | IC1 | Capsule ruptured during surgery |
T1c2 | IC2 | Capsule ruptured before surgery or tumor on the surface of the ovary/fallopian tube |
T1c3 | IC3 | Malignant cells in ascites or peritoneal washings |
T2 | II | Tumor involves one or both ovaries with pelvic extension |
T2a | IIA | Extension to and/or implants on the uterus and/or one or both fallopian tubes |
T2b | IIB | Extension to other pelvic tissues |
T3 and/or N1 | III | Tumor involves one or both ovaries with histologically confirmed peritoneal metastases beyond the pelvis and/or regional lymph node metastases (internal, external, and common iliac, obturator, sacral, or para-aortic lymph nodes) |
N1 | IIIA1 | Metastases in retroperitoneal lymph nodes only |
IIIA1(i) | Lymph node metastases $\le$10 mm in greatest dimension | |
IIIA(ii) | Lymph node metastases >10 mm in greatest dimension | |
T3a | IIIA2 | Microscopic, histologically confirmed peritoneal metastases beyond the pelvis with or without retroperitoneal lymph node metastases |
T3b | IIIB | Macroscopic intraperitoneal metastases beyond the pelvis up to 2 cm in greatest dimension inclusive, with/without retroperitoneal lymph node metastases |
T3c | IIIC | Intraperitoneal metastases beyond the pelvis greater than 2 cm in greatest dimension, with/without retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (including extension of the tumor to the liver and spleen capsule without parenchymal involvement) |
M1 | IV | Distant metastases (excluding intraperitoneal metastases) |
IVA | Pleural effusion with malignant cells | |
IVB | Metastases in parenchymal and other extra-abdominal organs (including inguinal lymph nodes and extra-abdominal lymph nodes) |
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
In early stages, the disease may be asymptomatic or present with minor discomfort. Symptoms at all stages may also include pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea. In advanced disease, it manifests with nonspecific symptoms: abdominal distension, weight loss, abdominal pain, dyspnea, general fatigue.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Criteria for establishing the disease or condition
The diagnosis is established based on:
anamnestic data;
physical and instrumental examination data;
morphological verification;
data obtained from diagnostic imaging of patients,
other confirmatory studies performed according to indications.
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
It is recommended to carefully take the history and complaints of all patients to identify factors that may influence the choice of treatment strategy [108].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: In early stages, the disease may be asymptomatic or present with minor discomfort. Initial symptoms may include pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea [4]. Special attention should be paid to age, menstrual irregularities, and family history, as germ cell tumors are predominantly diagnosed in adolescents and young women. In some cases, OGT presents with symptoms associated with atypical hormonal activity.
2.2 Physical Examination
It is recommended that all patients with suspected OGT undergo a thorough physical examination, including vaginal and rectal examinations, abdominal palpation, auscultation, and percussion of the lungs [108].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: special attention should be paid to the patient's general appearance during examination and assessment of the patient's performance status according to WHO/ECOG and/or Karnofsky scale (see Appendix G1-2), as well as nutritional status assessment. Body temperature, pain syndrome, and the presence of pleurisy or ascites must also be noted. In case of menstrual irregularities, consultation with several specialists is required: gynecologist, endocrinologist, geneticist.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
During initial diagnosis, it is recommended that all patients with OGT and suspected OGT undergo:
- complete blood count (CBC) with differential (hemoglobin, hematocrit, erythrocytes, mean corpuscular volume [MCV], red cell distribution width [RDW], mean corpuscular hemoglobin [MCH], mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration [MCHC], platelets, leukocytes, leukocyte differential, erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]);
- general clinical biochemical blood test assessing liver and kidney function (total protein, glucose, creatinine, urea, iron, alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], total bilirubin, lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], alkaline phosphatase [ALP], plasma electrolytes [potassium, sodium, chloride]);
- urinalysis (color, transparency, specific gravity, protein, pH, glucose, ketone bodies, urobilinogen, leukocyte esterase, automated microscopy for epithelial cells, erythrocytes, casts, crystals, mucus, bacteria, and fungi);
- coagulogram (screening hemostasis assay) (blood fibrinogen level, International Normalized Ratio [INR], prothrombin time in blood or plasma, activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT], thrombin time, blood D-dimer concentration, and additionally—antithrombin III activity in blood and plasminogen activator inhibitor level in blood, as clinically indicated).
- tumor marker panel (alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] serum level, human chorionic gonadotropin [free beta-subunit] serum level, LDH, CA 125 cancer antigen serum level, human epididymis protein 4 [HE4] blood level, inhibin B blood level, anti-Müllerian hormone blood level) in all patients with suspected OGT [7-10, 45, 108, 115].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: Elevated levels of AFP, β-hCG, and LDH above reference ranges are characteristic of GCT. AFP production is more consistent with yolk sac tumor manifestations, while β-hCG is characteristic of choriocarcinoma. Elevated AFP and β-hCG are typical of embryonal carcinoma and polyembryoma. About one-third of immature teratomas produce AFP [12].
The diagnosis of dysgerminoma is established not solely on the basis of the morphological report. This requires a normal AFP level and a β-hCG level not exceeding 200 IU/L. In other cases, the tumor should be classified as a non-dysgerminoma and treated accordingly. The presence of elevated AFP or β-hCG levels in patients with mature teratoma indicates the presence of a malignant component in the tumor. Such patients should be treated according to the non-dysgerminoma treatment principles.
CA-125 and HE4 levels may be slightly elevated in germ cell tumors and carcinosarcomas, and these markers have no diagnostic value in germ cell tumors, granulosa cell tumors, and sex cord-stromal tumors.
Inhibin B has high specificity as a tumor marker. In typical granulosa cell tumors, an elevated inhibin B level is observed in virtually all patients, and its serum concentration is directly dependent on tumor status. In rare cases, inhibin B may be undetectable, which is a sign of extreme malignancy. Anti-Müllerian hormone concentration in granulosa cell tumor is less informative [4].
All patients with suspected OGT are recommended to have total testosterone and total estradiol blood levels measured to verify the diagnosis and determine further treatment tactics [12, 13, 119, 107].
GOM CLOE 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Data Reliability – 4).
Comment: sex cord-stromal tumors are frequently characterized by the presence of testicular structures that produce sex hormones [12, 13]. In Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors and other hormonally active tumors, blood levels of total testosterone and estradiol may be elevated (virilization is observed in 70–85% of patients) [106, 107].
All patients with suspected OGT are recommended to have total blood calcium levels measured to verify the diagnosis and determine further treatment tactics [124, 125, 126].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: Hypercalcemia occurs in 70% of cases of small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type, which allows this tumor to be suspected already at the comprehensive examination stage [13].
All patients with OGT after surgical intervention are recommended to undergo a repeat blood AFP and β-hCG test, if they were initially elevated, to determine further management tactics and disease prognosis [7, 32, 108, 118].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: Persistently elevated marker levels indicate the presence of residual tumor.
It is recommended for all patients before each chemotherapy cycle to undergo serum AFP and β-hCG testing to verify the diagnosis and determine further management tactics [30, 45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: in patients with non-dysgerminoma, an increase in size or the appearance of new lesions while tumor markers (AFP and β-hCG) are decreasing or normal during therapy is not always a manifestation of progression (growing teratoma syndrome). In these situations, the initially planned chemotherapy regimen must be completed, followed by surgical removal of the tumor.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
All patients with OGT and suspected OGT are recommended ultrasound examination of the pelvic organs (transvaginal and transabdominal) and comprehensive ultrasound of the abdominal cavity, kidneys, retroperitoneal space, regional and distant lymph nodes [11, 44, 45, 108].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: Ultrasound – is the simplest imaging method for masses in the abdominal cavity, pelvic cavity, and retroperitoneal space, but it is significantly inferior to CT/MRI in assessing the extent of the process; therefore, CT/MRI may be performed instead of or after ultrasound for diagnostic clarification purposes.
It is recommended to perform computed tomography (CT) of the chest, CT/MRI of the abdomen, retroperitoneal space, and pelvis with intravenous contrast in patients with ovarian germ cell tumors and suspected ovarian germ cell tumors to verify the diagnosis and determine further treatment tactics [8, 15-17, 45, 108].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment:
- CT of the chest, abdomen, kidneys and upper urinary tract, and retroperitoneal space with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement is the most accurate diagnostic method for determining the extent of the tumor process and the efficacy of ongoing treatment.
- If there are contraindications to the use of iodine-containing radiocontrast agents (RCA), CT of the chest may be performed without contrast enhancement. If CT of the chest cannot be performed, targeted chest radiography is recommended. CT of the chest has higher sensitivity and specificity in detecting metastatic lesions of the lungs, pleura, and intrathoracic lymph nodes (LNs).
- If it is impossible to perform CT of the abdomen with intravenous contrast (contraindications to iodine-containing RCAs, pregnancy, etc.), MRI of the abdomen with or without intravenous contrast (during pregnancy) is recommended.
- MRI of the pelvis with intravenous contrast is more informative than MRI without contrast and is preferred over pelvic CT; MRI of the abdomen, kidneys, and retroperitoneal space can be used as an adjunct in case of ambiguous CT results
- In ongoing pregnancy, MRI of any localization is performed without the administration of RCAs.
In case of suspected distant metastasis in patients with ovarian germ cell tumors, it is recommended to perform whole-body positron emission tomography with tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals (PET-CT) [108, 45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: PET-CT may be useful in patients with ovarian germ cell tumors to determine process dissemination.
In case of a high β-hCG level (above 50,000 mIU/mL) or multiple lung metastases due to the high risk of metastatic brain involvement, brain MRI with contrast is recommended [108, 115].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: MRI with intravenous contrast is more informative than MRI without contrast (performed in the presence of contraindications to RCAs, including pregnancy)
All patients with ovarian germ cell tumors or suspected ovarian germ cell tumors are recommended to undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) to rule out a primary gastrointestinal (GI) tract tumor and assess for concomitant GI diseases [108, 115].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: EGD is a mandatory examination method for patients with suspected ovarian germ cell tumors, allowing to rule out secondary (metastatic) ovarian involvement in malignant neoplasms (MNs) of the GI tract.
All patients with ovarian germ cell tumors or suspected ovarian germ cell tumors are recommended to undergo colonoscopy for differential diagnosis with GI tract MNs and to assess for concomitant GI diseases [108, 115].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
2.5 Other Procedures
It is recommended that before initiating antitumor treatment, all patients with ovarian germ cell tumors undergo an initial general practitioner (examination, consultation) and consultations with other specialist physicians (initial anesthesiologist-resuscitologist examination (consultation), initial neurologist examination (consultation), initial cardiologist examination (consultation), initial endocrinologist examination (consultation), initial urologist examination (consultation), initial cardiovascular surgeon examination (consultation), initial endoscopist examination (consultation), etc.), as well as other additional clinical and laboratory tests when prescribed by a physician, in order to identify concomitant somatic pathology in patients and prevent life-threatening conditions [108, 115].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended that all patients with ovarian germ cell tumors under 40 years of age with primary amenorrhea undergo an initial geneticist examination (consultation) to study the karyotype in order to rule out gonadal dysgenesis (Swyer syndrome, XY genotype) [109].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Due to the rarity and complexity of morphological verification, it is recommended to review glass slides and blocks in a medical organization providing medical care in the field of oncology and having experience in treating patients with ovarian germ cell tumors to confirm the morphological diagnosis [45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended that all patients with ovarian germ cell tumors and suspected ovarian germ cell tumors undergo a pathomorphological examination of ovarian biopsy (surgical) material for morphological verification of the diagnosis, reflecting the following parameters in the report [3, 8, 14]:
- tumor dimensions, capsule damage, or tumor extension onto the capsule;
- histological structure of the tumor;
- tumor grade;
- presence of malignant cells in each individual peritoneal biopsy specimen, as well as the greater omentum;
- indication of the total number of examined and affected lymph nodes;
- degree of therapeutic pathomorphosis in the case of administered chemotherapy [3, 10].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment:
- Frequently, patients with germ cell tumors undergo emergency surgery in gynecological hospitals due to severe pain syndrome resulting from capsule rupture, hemorrhage, or tumor pedicle torsion. In most cases, morphological verification of the diagnosis can be obtained during the surgical stage of treatment or diagnostic laparoscopy.
- In the case of advanced tumor process and initiation of systemic treatment according to vital indications in patients with germ cell tumors, the presence of high AFP and/or β-hCG marker levels is sufficient for diagnosis.
- In certain situations, ovarian tumors may have an extragonadal location; in this case, ultrasound/CT-guided biopsy of the primary lesion is recommended.
- If morphological verification of the diagnosis is necessary, the pathomorphological examination of biopsy (surgical) material can be supplemented by immunohistochemical typing, especially in germ cell tumors and sex cord-stromal tumors.
It is recommended that in all patients with ovarian germ cell tumors presenting with ascites, a sample must be taken for cytological examination of the peritoneal fluid, and in the presence of clinically significant pleural effusion, a sample must be taken for cytological examination of the pleural fluid to clarify the disease stage and determine the further treatment algorithm [2, 10, 45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended that all patients with ovarian tumors and suspected ovarian tumors undergo cytological examination of cervical smears (cervical micropreparation) and cytological and/or pathomorphological examination of the endometrium of uterine tissues to verify the diagnosis [3, 5].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended that all patients with ovarian germ cell tumors after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT), during adjuvant and isolated CT, undergo CT of the chest, CT/MRI of the abdomen and pelvis in women with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement to assess treatment efficacy. In case of ambiguous CT/MRI results, PET-CT is recommended as an auxiliary method [45]
GRC CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: to standardize the evaluation of systemic treatment efficacy, it is effective to use RECIST – Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors.
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
3.1. Germ cell tumors of the ovary
3.1.1. Surgical treatment of ovarian germ cell tumors (OGCT)
In patients wishing to preserve fertility, regardless of the extent of the process, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended [7-10, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27-31, 110].
LoE AGoE 3Level of Evidence – A (Grade of Recommendation – 3).
In patients not wishing to preserve fertility, regardless of the extent of germ cell tumors, hysterectomy with adnexectomy (total hysterectomy with adnexectomy) via laparoscopic (using video endoscopic techniques) or laparotomic approach depending on the clinical situation is recommended [7-10, 16, 18, 22, 23, 27-31, 110].
LoE AGoE 3Level of Evidence – A (Grade of Recommendation – 3).
Comments: Surgical staging is of great importance in determining subsequent treatment tactics. Surgical treatment includes midline or lower midline laparotomy. A laparoscopic approach is possible in early-stage disease and small-sized ovarian tumors.
- Urgent intraoperative histological examination of the removed ovary is mandatory to determine the adequate surgical volume.
- Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is the recommended volume of surgical intervention regardless of the extent of the process in patients wishing to preserve fertility.
- In patients without reproductive potential or not wishing to preserve fertility, hysterectomy with adnexectomy is recommended.
- Resection of the contralateral ovary is performed only in the presence of macroscopic signs of involvement.
- In gonadal dysgenesis (XY karyotype, determined during genetic evaluation), bilateral adnexectomy (salpingo-oophorectomy) is performed.
Performing an omentectomy (resection of the greater omentum) along the transverse colon is recommended for staging purposes.
- To determine the stage of the disease, it is also mandatory to collect peritoneal washings from the parietal peritoneum of the diaphragm, paracolic gutters, and pelvis for subsequent cytologic examination, and biopsies of suspicious peritoneal lesions are performed. Iliac and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy (retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy) is performed only in patients with enlarged lymph nodes. The principle of surgical treatment includes the removal of all visible metastatic lesions without resection of adjacent organs.
Given the high chemosensitivity of the tumor, the extent of cytoreductive surgery should not be mutilating or lead to a potential increase in postoperative complications that could delay the start of chemotherapy.
In case of inadequate staging, repeat cytoreduction for restaging is recommended only if subsequent active surveillance is not considered as an option.
3.1.2. Post-surgical staging treatment tactics
Further treatment tactics depend on the histological type and stage of the disease. All ovarian germ cell tumors (OGCTs) are divided into two subtypes: "dysgerminoma," diagnosed based on morphological findings and tumor markers (AFP within normal limits, β-hCG should not exceed 200 mIU/mL). "Non-dysgerminoma" includes immature teratoma, yolk sac tumor, embryonal carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, polyembryoma, and mixed germ cell tumor. The treatment of other types of non-dysgerminoma, with the exception of immature teratoma, is similar to that of yolk sac tumor. In cases of mixed OGCT, treatment is planned according to the most unfavorable component [17, 21]. Table 2 presents the treatment strategy after staging in patients with OGCTs.
The rarity of germ cell tumors complicates large-scale clinical trials; therefore, all evidence regarding chemotherapy (CT) is extrapolated from clinical trials in male germ cell tumors, as these tumors share a common histogenetic origin, but occur more frequently in men than in women, and their management is based on a more extensive evidence base.
Table 2. Treatment strategy for OGCT patients after surgical staging
OGCT type | Disease stage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
IA G1 | IA G2-3 | IB-IC | IIA-IV | |
Dysgerminoma | Observation | 2 cycles of carboplatin** AUC7 | 3 cycles of BEP | |
Immature teratoma | Observation | 3 cycles of BEP | 3 cycles of BEP | 3–4 cycles of BEP* |
Yolk sac tumor | 3 cycles of BEP | 3 cycles of BEP | 3 cycles of BEP | 3–4 cycles of BEP* |
*In the absence of residual tumor, 3 cycles of chemotherapy (CT) according to the BEP regimen are indicated; in the presence of residual tumor, 4 cycles of CT according to the BEP regimen are recommended (see Table 3).
Stage IA. With adequate staging and confirmation of stage IA ovarian dysgerminoma, active surveillance is recommended (for the follow-up schedule, see section 3.1.3) [32, 33, 111].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
Stages IB–IC. Active surveillance is possible if adequate surgical staging has been performed. In the absence of adequate surgical staging or if active surveillance is declined, it is recommended to administer 3 cycles of adjuvant CT according to the BEP regimen (see Table 3) or 2 cycles of single-agent carboplatin** AUC7 [45].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Stages IIA–IV. It is recommended to administer 3 cycles of CT according to the BEP regimen (see Table 3) [7, 45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: if LDH levels are elevated above 2 times the upper limit of normal or if visceral metastases are present, 4 cycles of BEP are recommended (see Table 3) [7].
In patients older than 40 years, as well as in those with concomitant interstitial lung disease, 4 cycles of the EP regimen are recommended (see Table 3). [45]
Stage IA G1. With adequate staging and confirmation of stage IA G1 immature ovarian teratoma, active surveillance is recommended (for the follow-up schedule, see section 3.1.3) [4, 36, 45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Stages IA G2–IC. It is recommended to administer CT according to the BEP regimen (3 cycles) (see Table 3) [4, 45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Stages IIA–IV. It is recommended to administer CT according to the BEP regimen (see Table 3) [6, 7, 11, 17, 35, 45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: the number of chemotherapy cycles depends on the presence of residual tumor after surgical treatment: in the absence of residual tumor, 3 cycles of CT according to the BEP regimen are indicated (see Table 3); in the presence of residual tumor, 4 cycles of CT according to the BEP regimen are recommended (see Table 3). Elevated levels of tumor markers AFP or hCG indicate the presence of residual tumor.
Yolk sac tumor belongs to the unfavorable prognosis subtype.
Patients with yolk sac tumor are recommended to receive chemotherapy regardless of the disease stage [36, 113].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
Patients with early stages and/or absence of residual tumor are recommended to receive 3 cycles of CT according to the BEP regimen (see Table 3) [113].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
Patients with early stages in the presence of residual disease are recommended to receive 4 cycles of CT according to the BEP regimen (see Table 3) [113].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
3.1.3. Principles of active surveillance after surgical treatment for stage IA in patients with dysgerminoma and immature teratoma
Patients are recommended to undergo close active surveillance according to the schedule, provided that surgical staging has been performed [45].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: follow-up schedule for dysgerminoma (conducted in an outpatient setting at a regional oncological dispensary or by a district oncologist). Physical and gynecological examination, AFP, β-hCG, and LDH levels; abdominal and pelvic ultrasound every 3 months for the 1st year; every 4 months for the 2nd and 3rd years; every 6 months for the 4th year; and annually thereafter (up to 10 years). Chest X-ray or CT is performed every 6 months for the first two years, and annually thereafter (up to 5 years).
Follow-up schedule for immature teratoma: physical and gynecological examination, AFP and β-hCG levels every 1–2 months; abdominal and pelvic ultrasound every 2 months for the 1st year; every 3 months for the 2nd and 3rd years; every 6 months for the 4th year; and annually thereafter (up to 10 years). Chest X-ray or CT is performed every 6 months for the first two years, and annually thereafter (up to 5 years).
3.1.4. Principles of chemotherapy
CT after surgery and intraoperative staging should ideally be initiated as soon as possible, within 10–14 days [16, 40], according to the regimens specified in Table 3.
If there are contraindications to bleomycin**, CT according to the EP program (see Table 3) is recommended, consisting of 3 cycles in the absence of residual tumor and 4 cycles in the presence of residual tumor [6, 18, 23, 45, 114].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: due to the development of late bleomycin** toxicity in the form of pneumonitis, it is recommended to exclude bleomycin** from the treatment regimen in patients older than 40 years or with a prior history of pulmonary disease. In patients with advanced non-dysgerminoma, an equally effective but more myelotoxic alternative to the BEP regimen is the PEI combination (etoposide**, cisplatin**, ifosfamide**) (see Table 3).
Table 3. Main first-line chemotherapy regimens for germ cell tumors [109].
Regimen | Drugs | Administration | Treatment days |
|---|---|---|---|
BEP [109] | Bleomycin**% 30 mg Etoposide** 100 mg/m2 Cisplatin**§ 20 mg/m2 | IV, 2–20 min IV, 40 min IV, 1 hour | Days 1, 3, 5 Days 1–5 Days 1–5 |
EP [109] | Etoposide** 100 mg/m2 Cisplatin**§ 20 mg/m2 | IV, 40 min IV, 1 hour | Days 1–5 Days 1–5 |
PEI [109] | Etoposide** 75 mg/m2 #Ifosfamide** 1200 mg/m2 Cisplatin**§ 20 mg/m2 Mesna**§ | IV, 40 min IV, 1–2 hours IV, 1 h IV, bolus* | Days 1–5 Days 1–5 Days 1–5 Days 1–5 |
Bleomycin may be presented as bleomycin hydrochloride (isomer A5) and bleomycin sulfate (a mixture of isomers A2 and B2), which have different pharmacological activities. When using bleomycin sulfate in the BEP regimen, doses of 30 mg are used on days 1, 3, 5 (or days 1, 8, 15). When using the less studied bleomycin hydrochloride, cycle doses are 30–40% lower, for example, 30 mg on days 1 and 5;
§ administration of cisplatin** is carried out against the background of intravenous hydration with normal saline** (total daily volume 2.5 L), necessary to maintain diuresis >100 mL/hour during cisplatin** administration and for the subsequent 3 hours;
§ mesna** is used at a daily dose of 100% of the ifosfamide** dose, divided into three administrations throughout the day: immediately before ifosfamide** and then 4 and 8 hours after the start of its infusion.
All chemotherapy cycles are administered every 3 weeks (calculated from the start of the previous chemotherapy course). A delay of the scheduled treatment course is possible in the presence of infection, neutropenia less than 500/µL, or thrombocytopenia less than 50,000/µL on the first day of the planned course (see the drug dose reduction table). If febrile neutropenia, grade IV neutropenia lasting more than 7 days, or neutropenia complicated by infection was noted during the previous chemotherapy course, prophylactic administration of colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) is justified for all subsequent chemotherapy courses. In patients in poor general condition due to the extent of the tumor process, the first course may be administered in a 40–60% reduced dose (e.g., etoposide** and cisplatin** for two days) [4, 11, 21, 24, 35, 40-44, 121]. The dose reduction algorithm is presented in Table 4.
Table 4. Algorithm for dose reduction of chemotherapy drugs in the VIP regimen depending on hematological toxicity* [6]
Platelet count, ×109/L | ³100 | 75-99 | 50-74 | <50 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Neutrophil count, ×109/L | Etoposide** | Cisplatin** | Etoposide** | Cisplatin** | Etoposide** | Cisplatin** | Etoposide** | Cisplatin** |
³1,0 | 100% | 100% | 75% | 100% | 50% | 100% | 4-day delay | |
0,5-0,99 | 100% | 100% | 50% | 100% | 4-day delay | 4-day delay | ||
<0,5 | 4-day delay | 4-day delay | 4-day delay | 4-day delay | ||||
*determined by laboratory tests on the day of the start of the next chemotherapy course; the percentage of the drug dose is indicated.
- Before each 1st-line chemotherapy course, it is necessary to determine tumor markers; upon completion of chemotherapy, repeat CT of the baseline affected areas to determine further treatment tactics [18, 19, 22, 23, 30-32, 37].
- In patients with non-seminoma, an increase in size or the appearance of new lesions against the background of decreasing or normal tumor markers (AFP and hCG) during therapy is not always a manifestation of progression (growing teratoma syndrome). In such situations, it is necessary to complete the initiated planned volume of chemotherapy followed by surgical removal of the tumor.
3.1.5. Treatment of residual tumor after chemotherapy
In the presence of a residual tumor in seminoma (peritoneum, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, lungs, mediastinal lymph nodes, etc.) after completion of chemotherapy and normalization of tumor markers, further treatment is not recommended; active surveillance is recommended [11].
Level of recommendations-based evidence – 5 (level of data reliability – C).
Comment: if the residual tumor size is >3 cm, PET/CT can be performed. If there is pathological uptake of the radiopharmaceutical in the residual tumor, its removal is advisable. If the patient refuses or surgical treatment is technically impossible, a repeat PET/CT is recommended after 2-3 months. If the increased uptake persists, the issue of surgical treatment or active surveillance should be reconsidered.
In the presence of a residual tumor in non-seminoma (peritoneum, retroperitoneal lymph nodes, lungs, mediastinal lymph nodes, etc.) <1 cm after completion of chemotherapy and normalization of tumor markers, further treatment is not recommended; active surveillance is recommended [11].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: if the residual tumor size is >1 cm, its removal is indicated. In case of involvement of multiple anatomical regions, surgical treatment begins with the zone of maximum involvement. Patients with a complete regression, or those in whom necrosis or teratoma is found in the resected residual tumor, are subject to surveillance. In questionable cases with a small tumor and a normal marker level, consultation at an expert center is recommended.
If elements of a malignant germ cell tumor are detected in the residual tumor, second-line chemotherapy (TIP or VeIP regimens) is recommended: 2 cycles in case of radical surgery, 4 cycles in case of non-radical surgery [21, 29, 35, 45–48, 115, 109].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Before starting chemotherapy for a recurrence, it is recommended to exclude growing teratoma syndrome—the appearance or increase in size of metastases against the background of decreasing/normal tumor markers [109].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
If growing teratoma syndrome is confirmed, surgical treatment—complete removal of recurrent tumor nodes, which may be represented by glial tissue (peritoneal gliomatosis), cartilage tissue (chondromatosis), or elements of a mature teratoma—is recommended for all patients [115]. In case of multiple recurrences, repeated surgical interventions are recommended until complete cure.
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: Repeated recurrences of growing teratoma syndrome and peritoneal gliomatosis are quite likely, especially if the nodules were not completely excised. When this syndrome is confirmed, chemotherapy is not indicated.
In case of recurrence of germ cell tumors, chemotherapy based on a combination of #ifosfamide** and cisplatin** is recommended (Table 5) [6, 42–44].
GOR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comments:
The optimal chemotherapy regimen is TIP, which allows achieving long-term survival in 25% of patients. The VeIP regimen can serve as an alternative. Usually, 4 cycles are administered [45, 47]. No superiority of one regimen over the other as second-line therapy has been shown.
Table 5. Chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of GCT recurrences
Regimen | Drugs | Administration | Treatment days | Number of chemotherapy cycles | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Second-line chemotherapy regimens | ||||||
TIP [123, 115] | #Paclitaxel** 175 mg/m2 #Ifosfamide** 1500 mg/m2 Cisplatin¶** 25 mg/m2 Mesna§** #Filgrastim** 5 mcg/kg | IV, 3 h IV, 1–2 h IV, 1 h IV, bolus* subcutaneously | Day 1 Days 2–5 Days 2–5 Days 2–5 Days 6–15 | 4 cycles are the preferred second-line regimen, cycle duration is 21 days | ||
PEI [116] | Etoposide** 75 mg/m2 Ifosfamide** 1200 mg/m2 Cisplatin** 20 mg/m2 Mesna** | IV, 40 min IV, 1–2 hours IV, 1 h IV, bolus* | Days 1–5 Days 1–5 Days 1–5 Days 1–5 | 4 cycles are the preferred second-line regimen, cycle duration is 21 days | ||
VeIP [48, 116, 45] | #Ifosfamide** 1200 mg/m2 Mesna** Cisplatin** 20 mg/m2 #Vinblastine** 0.11 mg/kg #Filgrastim** 5 mcg/kg | IV, IV, bolus* IV, IV subcutaneously | Days 1–5 Days 1–5 Days 1–5 Days 1, 2 Days 6–15 | 4 cycles are the standard second-line regimen, cycle duration is 21 days | ||
Third-line chemotherapy regimens | ||||||
TGO [123] | #Paclitaxel** 80 mg/m2 #Gemcitabine** 800 mg/m2 #Oxaliplatin** 130 mg/m2 | IV, 1 hour IV, 30 min IV, 2 h | Days 1, 8 Days 1, 8 Day 1 | 4 cycles, cycle duration is 21 days | ||
GemOX [123] | #Gemcitabine** 1000 mg/m2 #Oxaliplatin** 130 mg/m2 | IV, 1 hour IV, 30 min | Days 1, 8 Day 1 | 4 cycles, cycle duration is 21 days | ||
¶cisplatin** administration is carried out against the background of intravenous hydration with normal saline (total daily volume 2.5 L) required to maintain diuresis >100 mL/hour during the administration of cisplatin** and for the subsequent 3 hours;
§mesna** is used in a daily dose equal to 100% of the ifosfamide** dose and divided into three administrations during the day: immediately before ifosfamide** and then 4 and 8 hours after the start of its infusion.
After completion of chemotherapy for germ cell tumor recurrence, surgical removal of all residual tumor is recommended for patients [45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
In case of AFP and/or β-hCG elevation despite ongoing therapy, exhaustion of chemotherapy options, and localization of the tumor within a single anatomical region, its removal is recommended [21, 24, 42, 45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: this approach offers a cure rate of about 25% in patients, particularly those with late relapses, moderately elevated AFP levels, and retroperitoneal localization of the residual tumor. In case of rapid progression with rising β-hCG, surgical treatment is futile [46].
In the treatment of late relapses of germ cell tumors (after 2 years from the end of prior chemotherapy), surgical treatment is recommended [15, 42, 45, 54, 106].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: the proportion of late relapses among all relapses does not exceed 5%. A characteristic feature of late relapses is low sensitivity to chemotherapy, which makes it advisable to perform radical surgery as a first step for potentially resectable tumors, even in the presence of elevated markers. If radical tumor removal is not feasible and markers are elevated, second-line chemotherapy should be initiated, followed by surgery.
3.2. Sex cord-stromal tumors
3.2.1. Surgical treatment of sex cord-stromal tumors
It is recommended that all patients with sex cord-stromal tumors undergo surgical treatment consisting of hysterectomy with adnexa (total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy), greater omentectomy; in case of enlarged lymph nodes (pelvic, para-aortic), pelvic and retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy, and surgical staging procedures performed via laparoscopy (using video-endoscopic technologies) or laparotomy, depending on the clinical situation [40].
GOR CLOE 3Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comments: laparoscopic access is appropriate in early stages (IA-IB) for small tumors. Biopsy of the contralateral ovary is not advisable if it appears visually normal.
In young patients with sex cord-stromal tumors and unfulfilled reproductive potential who present with early-stage disease (unilateral ovarian involvement), fertility-sparing surgery is recommended, consisting of unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (on the affected side) with biopsy of the contralateral ovary (if pathologically altered) and subtotal greater omentectomy (via video-endoscopic or open laparotomy approach depending on the clinical situation), adhering to surgical staging principles [40].
GOR CLOE 3Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comment: given the high probability of unilateral ovarian involvement and the young age of patients with sex cord-stromal tumors, preference is given to fertility-sparing surgical approaches. Endometrial status should be evaluated. If ultrasound signs suggest potential endometrial pathology, endometrial aspiration biopsy or diagnostic curettage is recommended.
Performing a biopsy of the contralateral ovary in young patients with unfulfilled reproductive potential at an early stage is not advisable if it appears visually normal.
3.2.2. Sex cord tumors (granulosa cell tumor)
In stage IA–B with adequate staging of sex cord-stromal tumors, follow-up after surgery is recommended [45]; for tumor sizes greater than 10–15 cm, adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated [13, 17, 26, 45, 54, 56].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
In stage I with high-risk recurrence factors, adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended [13, 17, 45].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: For patients with stage IC, indications for adjuvant chemotherapy are not yet fully established. High-risk factors in stage I include: tumor rupture, stage IC, low tumor differentiation, and tumor size exceeding 10–15 cm.
Adjuvant or first-line therapy for stages IC–IV in sex cord-stromal tumors includes 3–4 cycles of BEP chemotherapy or 6 cycles of chemotherapy with #carboplatin** and #paclitaxel** [45] (see Table 6).
Level of Recommendations CLevel of Evidence 5Level of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
The possibility of treating local relapses must be discussed at a multidisciplinary tumor board involving a radiation oncologist.
GOM CLOE 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Data Reliability – 4).
3.2.3. Treatment of ovarian stromal tumors (Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors)
For stage IA ovarian stromal tumors, active surveillance is recommended; in young patients with poorly differentiated tumors or heterologous elements in the tumor, adjuvant chemotherapy with BEP (3 cycles), EP (4 cycles), or 6 cycles of #paclitaxel** and #carboplatin** (Table 6) is recommended [13, 45, 57].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Table 6. Chemotherapy regimens for sex cord-stromal tumors
Adjuvant/first-line chemotherapy regimens | |
|---|---|
BEP [123] | #Bleomycin§** 30 mg IV over 2–20 min on days 1, 3, and 5 + #etoposide** 100 mg/m2 IV over 40 min on days 1–5 + #cisplatin** 20 mg/m2 IV over 2 h on days 1–5, 4 cycles every 3 weeks |
CPtx [123] | #Carboplatin** AUC6 IV over 1 h on day 1 + #paclitaxel** 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 h on day 1, 4 cycles every 3 weeks |
EP [115, 123] | #Etoposide** 100 mg/m2 IV over 40 min on days 1–5 + #cisplatin** 20 mg/m2 IV over 2 h on days 1–5, 4 cycles every 3 weeks |
Chemotherapy regimens for advanced stages and relapses of sex cord-stromal tumors (in patients previously treated with the BEP regimen) | |
CPtx [123] | #Carboplatin** AUC6 IV over 2 h on day 1 + #paclitaxel** 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 h on day 1, 4–6 cycles every 3 weeks |
TIP [115, 123] | #Paclitaxel** 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 h on day 1 + #cisplatin** 25 mg/m2 IV over 2 h on days 2–5 + #ifosfamide** 1500 mg/m2 IV over 2 h on days 2–5 (+ mesna 400 mg/m2 IV 3 times a day on days 2–5 + G-CSF (#filgrastim**) 5 mcg/kg SC on days 6–12), 4 cycles every 3 weeks |
CDE [123] | #Cyclophosphamide** 1000 mg/m2 IV over 30 min on day 1 + #doxorubicin** 45 mg/m2 IV over 10–20 min on day 1 + #etoposide** 100 mg/m2 IV over 40 min on days 1–3, 4–6 cycles every 3 weeks |
CAV [123] | #Cyclophosphamide** 1000 mg/m2 IV over 30 min on day 1 + #doxorubicin** 50 mg/m2 IV over 10–20 min on day 1 + #vincristine** 1.4 mg/m2 IV over 1 min on day 1, 4–6 cycles every 3 weeks |
Second- and third-line drug therapy regimens for advanced stages and relapses of sex cord-stromal tumors and steroid cell tumors | |
#Ifosfamide** 1.6 g/m2 IV on days 1–3 as a 1-hour infusion (+ #mesna** calculated as 100% of the ifosfamide dose IV push simultaneously on days 1–3) + #paclitaxel** 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 h on day 3 every 3 weeks [115] | |
#Docetaxel** 75 mg/m2 IV over 1 h every 3 weeks [115] | |
#Bevacizumab** 7.5–15 mg/kg on day 1 IV over 30–90 min every 3 weeks [45, 58] | |
#Tamoxifen** 20 mg twice daily continuously [115] | |
Aromatase inhibitors [130, 131, 115] – #letrozole** 2.5 mg/day orally daily [130] – #anastrozole** 1 mg/day orally daily [131] – #exemestane** 25 mg/day orally daily [115] | |
GnRH analogues [51, 115, 132] – #leuprorelin** 3.75 mg IM once every 28 days [115] – #goserelin** 3.6 mg SC once every 28 days or 10.8 mg SC once every 84 days [132, 115] – #buserelin** 3.75 mg IM once every 28 days [115] | |
§The dose of #bleomycin may be reduced in patients older than 40 years (e.g., omitting #bleomycin in the 4th cycle). When using domestic bleomycin hydrochloride instead of bleomycin sulfate, cumulative doses must be reduced by one-third (e.g., 30 mg on days 1 and 5).
In patients with stage IB–IV disease, adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended: 3–4 cycles of BEP or 6 cycles of chemotherapy with #paclitaxel** and #carboplatin** (see Table 6) [12, 45, 57].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
3.2.4. Treatment of advanced stages and recurrences of sex cord-stromal tumors
Due to the low sensitivity of the tumor to cytostatic agents, patients with advanced stages and relapses of sex cord-stromal tumors are recommended to consider the feasibility of surgical treatment followed by chemotherapy [2, 14, 45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: optimal cytoreductive surgeries are the most effective. In advanced stages and disease relapse, surgery is performed as the first step, followed by 3–4 cycles of BEP chemotherapy or 6 cycles of the ovarian cancer regimen – #paclitaxel** + #carboplatin** (see Table 6). If prior therapy included the BEP regimen, the following ovarian cancer drug combinations are possible: "#paclitaxel** + #carboplatin**" or "#cyclophosphamide** + #doxorubicin** + #cisplatin**" (see Table 6). There is evidence of the efficacy of hormone therapy (gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues, antiestrogens, aromatase inhibitors) in granulosa cell tumors of the ovary [55]. Granulosa cell tumors can recur years later, up to 20 years, which necessitates long-term patient follow-up.
For patients who are not candidates for surgical treatment followed by chemotherapy, presenting with massive or residual tumors, or in cases of disease recurrence, it is recommended to consult a radiation oncologist to determine the feasibility of palliative radiotherapy [128, 129].
GOM CLOE 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Data Reliability – 4).
3.2.5. Neuroendocrine tumors (small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type)
This is a rare, highly aggressive type of non-epithelial ovarian tumor [24] that requires an individualized clinical approach for each patient; therefore, treatment should preferably be carried out in a medical center with experience in managing such patients [24].
For patients with small cell ovarian carcinoma of the hypercalcemic type, it is recommended to perform surgical treatment via laparotomy, including total hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy, greater omentectomy, and surgical staging procedures. Fertility-sparing treatment is not recommended [3, 59].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
For all patients with stages IC–IV, it is recommended to administer adjuvant or 1st-line chemotherapy containing platinum-based drugs, such as the EP regimen (see Table 6 for dosing) [59].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
For patients with small cell ovarian cancer experiencing disease progression, it is recommended to administer treatment similar to that for small cell lung cancer due to their shared histogenesis [24, 26, 59].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
3.3 Pain management
The procedures and recommendations for pain management in epithelial ovarian cancer correspond to the guidelines presented in the clinical practice recommendations «Chronic Pain Syndrome (CPS) in Adult Patients Requiring Palliative Care» [http://cr.rosminzdrav.ru/#!/recomend/708].
3.4. Diet therapy
Currently, there is evidence of an increased risk of cancer in overweight and obese patients; therefore, measures aimed at reducing patients' excess weight to normal values are recommended. Adjusting the usual diet in such patients will help prevent complications from ongoing treatment (surgical, drug, or radiation therapy) [1].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
4.1. Prehabilitation
Pre-rehabilitation significantly accelerates functional recovery, shortens hospital stays after surgery, and reduces the rate of complications and mortality during cancer treatment. Pre-rehabilitation includes physical conditioning (therapeutic exercise/physical therapy), psychological and nutritional support, and patient education [63].
Physical pre-rehabilitation consists of a combination of aerobic and anaerobic loads. Such a combination improves exercise tolerance, enhances quality of life, and increases muscle tone.
Increasing physical activity 2 weeks before surgery improves postoperative quality of life, allowing a return to full daily activities as early as 3 weeks post-surgery [64].
An increased level of physical activity significantly improves the quality of life and survival of patients with ovarian cancer [77].
For all patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, it is recommended to perform physical therapy in the preoperative period in order to reduce the frequency and probability of postoperative complications [65].
GCR ALEL 3Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 3).
It is recommended to perform respiratory muscle training for all patients during pre-rehabilitation to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and hospital stay duration [63].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
For all patients, it is recommended to provide psychological support as part of pre-rehabilitation to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications and hospital stay duration [65].
GCR ALEL 3Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comment: psychological support improves mood and reduces anxiety and depression in patients. Patients who have undergone a course of psychological pre-rehabilitation adapt better to everyday life after surgical treatment
It is recommended to use stress-management techniques (relaxation techniques, fostering a positive mindset) in psychological pre-rehabilitation and patient support for 40–60 minutes, 6 days a week, starting 5 days before surgery and continuing for 30 days after, which significantly improves patients' quality of life [66].
GOR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 3).
4.2. Stage I rehabilitation in surgical treatment
In order to reduce the duration of hospital stay and the rate of postoperative complications, it is recommended to manage surgical patients using fast-track rehabilitation and ERAS («early rehabilitation after surgery») programs. These include multimodal pain control, early enteral nutrition, avoidance of routine nasogastric tubes and drains, and early mobilization (activation and verticalization) of patients as early as 1–2 days post-surgery without increasing the risks of early postoperative complications or hospital readmission rates [67, 68].
GUR CLOE 4Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 4).
As part of early patient rehabilitation, it is recommended to start a complex of physical therapy early, incorporating aerobic, strength, and stretching exercises to increase patients' physical endurance [69].
GOR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comment: Early initiation of physical therapy does not increase the rate of postoperative complications and improves quality of life.
It is recommended to use incentive spirometry, elevate the head of the bed by more than 30 degrees, start breathing exercises early, perform oral hygiene twice a day, and ensure early patient mobilization to prevent pulmonary congestion and postoperative pneumonia in the postoperative period [70].
GCR CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4).
It is recommended to provide venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (early mobilization, prophylactic administration of antithrombotic agents (anticoagulants), and wearing compression stockings) for all patients in the postoperative period [71].
GCR ALEL 3Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comment: in the postoperative period, more than 75% of patients develop it more than 7 days after surgery; furthermore, ovarian cancer patients with prolonged hospitalization and a history of venous thromboembolism have an increased risk of developing it.
For all patients, it is recommended to manage postoperative pain using an interdisciplinary approach, and in addition to drug therapy, to use the following methods: physical rehabilitation (physical therapy), positioning, psychological pain relief methods (relaxation), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and acupuncture [72].
GRC CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
For all patients, it is recommended to conduct general medical massage sessions starting from the 2nd day after surgery to reduce pain intensity, anxiety, and tension, and to improve the patient's quality of life [73].
GRC CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
For all patients, it is recommended to conduct psychological counseling and relaxation techniques in the postoperative period, which helps reduce patient anxiety and tension, decreases the frequency of analgesic use, and improves the quality of life in gynecological cancer patients [74].
GPR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
4.3. Stage II of rehabilitation in surgical treatment
All patients are recommended to maintain an active lifestyle after completing treatment [75].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: obesity and a sedentary lifestyle following multimodal treatment for ovarian cancer are independent factors that worsen patients' quality of life and lead to distress
All patients are recommended to engage in physical activity—a combination of strength training, aerobic exercise, and stretching—which significantly improves patients' quality of life and helps control weight [76].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
For all patients who develop lower limb lymphedema, it is recommended to perform complete decongestive therapy, including manual lymphatic drainage, wearing compression garments, performing a complex of physical exercises, and skin care [78, 79].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 3).
For all patients who develop lower limb lymphedema, it is also recommended to prescribe:
- Intermittent pneumatic compression of the lower extremities in combination with complete decongestive therapy [79]
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5);
- Electrotherapy in combination with complete decongestive therapy [81]
GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2);
- Pulsed low-frequency electromagnetic therapy (low-frequency magnetotherapy) in combination with complete decongestive therapy [82].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5);
- Pulsed oscillometry (alternating electric field massage) in combination with complete decongestive therapy [83].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
All patients are recommended to have acupuncture sessions, as it significantly reduces fatigue and improves quality of life [84].
GOR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
4.4. Stage III of rehabilitation in surgical treatment
Functional pelvic floor disorders significantly impair the social adaptation of patients with female reproductive system tumors, leading to physical and psychological disability [89].
A healthy lifestyle and daily physical activity help control clinical manifestations of menopause such as depression and fatigue, and provide prevention of cardiovascular and osteoporosis-related complications in patients after combined treatment for malignancies [85, 86]. Increased physical activity has a positive effect on sexual function in patients with gynecological cancer [88].
All patients with gynecological cancer experiencing menopause are recommended psychological support and patient education to improve quality of life [86].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
All patients are recommended to undergo periodic courses of medical massage, as they significantly improve quality of life by reducing fatigue, depression, and clinical manifestations of menopause [95].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
4.5. Rehabilitation during chemotherapy
It is recommended that all patients perform a set of exercise therapy (LFK) daily during and after combined treatment — daily physical activity increases muscle strength, improves cardiovascular function, reduces the risk of anxiety and depression, reduces fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and pain, and improves mood [91, 92].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Dosed, gradually increasing physical activity improves tolerance to chemotherapy in patients with gynaecologic malignancies [92].
It is recommended that patients with anemia engage in aerobic exercise during high-dose chemotherapy, as aerobic exercise has a positive effect on hemoglobin and erythrocyte levels and reduces the duration of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia [93].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
To reduce fatigue, asthenia, and depression during chemotherapy, it is recommended to perform exercise therapy (LFK). Combining exercise therapy with psychological support in treating chemotherapy-induced fatigue and depression is more effective than pharmacotherapy alone [94].
GOR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
It is recommended to undergo a 6-week course of medical massage during combined treatment to reduce fatigue, asthenia, and depression [96].
LoE CGoR 5Level of evidence – C (grade of recommendation – 5)
Comment: this recommendation is based on the results of a study evaluating the effects of massage on breast cancer patients; there is no reason to assume this therapy would be ineffective in ovarian cancer patients.
Balance training exercises are recommended for the management of polyneuropathy, as they are more effective than a combination of endurance and strength exercises [97].
GGR BERL 3Grade of Recommendations – B (Evidence Level – 3).
Patients receiving chemotherapy are recommended a 6-week course of terrain cure (walking therapy) to control the clinical manifestations of polyneuropathy [98].
GPR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
It is recommended to use low-level laser therapy in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral polyneuropathy [99].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Low-frequency magnetotherapy is recommended for the treatment of peripheral polyneuropathy induced by chemotherapy [100].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Recommended transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 minutes per day for 4 weeks in addition to standard antiemetic therapy to control nausea and vomiting in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy** [101].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Low-level laser therapy is recommended for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in the patient [102].
GOR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
It is recommended to use a scalp cooling system (a device for preventing chemotherapy-induced alopecia) to prevent alopecia [103, 104].
GCP CLEL 3Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 3).
All patients are recommended to perform a set of exercise therapy (LFK) to reduce the incidence of cardiac complications during chemotherapy [105].
LoE AGoE 3Level of Evidence – A (Grade of Recommendation – 3).
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
Given the high curability of germ cell tumors and the long life expectancy of patients, prevention and early diagnosis of late chemotherapy complications (cardiovascular diseases, metabolic syndrome, hypogonadism, infertility, pulmonary toxicity, etc.) involving relevant specialists are required.
For patients with stage I nondysgerminoma under active surveillance (no chemotherapy administered), the following is recommended [45, 115]:
- physical examination and tumor markers monthly in the first year, every 2 months in the second year, every 3 months in the third year, every 4 months in the fourth year, every 6 months in the fifth year, and annually thereafter;
- comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, comprehensive pelvic ultrasound (transvaginal and transabdominal), regional and distant lymph node ultrasound every 2 months in the first year, every 3 months in the second year, every 4 months in the third and fourth years, and annually thereafter;
- chest X-ray performed at every second visit [45, 115] for early detection of disease progression or recurrence.
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
For patients with stage I germinoma after completed chemotherapy, active surveillance is recommended:
- physical examination, tumor markers, comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, comprehensive pelvic ultrasound (vaginal and transabdominal), ultrasound of regional and distant lymph nodes, and the retroperitoneal space every 2–3 months in the first year, every 3 months in the second year, then every 4 months in the third and fourth years, every 6 months in the fifth year, and annually thereafter;
- chest X-ray performed at every second visit [45, 115] for early detection of disease progression or recurrence.
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Sex cord-stromal tumors
Patients with early-stage, low-risk sex cord-stromal tumors after completion of treatment are recommended to undergo follow-up care with an oncologist for early detection of disease progression or recurrence, consisting of: physical examination, determination of tumor marker levels (inhibin, anti-Müllerian hormone, estradiol, testosterone depending on the histological type of the tumor), comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, comprehensive pelvic ultrasound (transvaginal and transabdominal), retroperitoneal ultrasound, and regional and distant lymph node ultrasound every 6–12 months for 10 years or more [14, 45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Patients with early-stage, high-risk and advanced-stage sex cord-stromal tumors after completion of treatment are recommended to undergo follow-up care with an oncologist for early detection of disease progression or recurrence, consisting of: physical examination, determination of tumor marker levels (inhibin, anti-Müllerian hormone, estradiol, testosterone depending on the histological type of the tumor), comprehensive abdominal ultrasound, comprehensive pelvic ultrasound (transvaginal and transabdominal), and regional and distant lymph node ultrasound every 4–6 months for 10 years or more. Chest X-ray once a year. Contrast-enhanced CT of the abdomen and/or chest as clinically indicated [14, 45].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
6. Organization of Medical Care
Medical care, with the exception of medical care provided as part of clinical trials, in accordance with Federal Law No. 323-FZ dated November 21, 2011, "On the Basics of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation," is organized and provided:
1) in accordance with the regulations on the organization of medical care by types of medical care, approved by the authorized Federal Executive Authority;
2) in accordance with the procedures for the provision of medical care approved by the authorized federal executive authority and mandatory for implementation across the Russian Federation by all medical organizations;
3) based on these clinical guidelines;
4) taking into account the standards of medical care approved by the authorized Federal Executive Authority.
Primary specialized health care is provided by an oncologist and other medical specialists at an ambulatory cancer care center, or, in its absence, at a primary oncology office or the outpatient department of an oncological dispensary (cancer hospital).
In case of suspicion or detection of an oncological disease in a patient, general practitioners, district general practitioners, general family physicians, medical specialists, and mid-level medical personnel shall refer the patient in the established manner for consultation to an outpatient oncological care center, or, in its absence, to a primary oncological office or the outpatient department of an oncological dispensary (oncological hospital) for the provision of primary specialized health care.
Consultation at an outpatient oncological care center, primary oncological office, or outpatient department of an oncological dispensary (oncological hospital) must be performed no later than 3 working days from the date of issuing the referral for consultation. The oncologist of the outpatient oncological care center (in the absence of such a center, the oncologist of the primary oncological office or outpatient department of the oncological dispensary/hospital) arranges for the acquisition of biopsy (surgical) material, as well as the performance of other diagnostic tests necessary to establish the diagnosis, including the extent of the oncological process and the stage of the disease.
If it is impossible to obtain biopsy (surgical) material or perform other diagnostic tests within the medical organization that includes the ambulatory cancer care center (primary oncology office), the patient is referred by the oncologist to an oncological dispensary (cancer hospital) or to a medical organization providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases.
The timeframe for performing pathological examinations necessary for the histological verification of malignant neoplasms shall not exceed 15 working days from the date of receipt of the biopsy (surgical) material by the pathoanatomical bureau (department).
The timeframe for diagnostic instrumental and laboratory examinations in case of suspected oncological disease shall not exceed the timeframes established in the state guarantee program for the free provision of medical care to citizens, approved by the Government of the Russian Federation, which is 7 working days from the date of prescribing the examinations.
The diagnosis of an oncological disease is established by a medical specialist based on the results of diagnostic examinations, including cytological and/or histological verification of the diagnosis, except for cases where obtaining biopsy and/or puncture material is not feasible.
An oncologist from an outpatient oncological care center (primary oncology office) refers the patient to an oncological dispensary (oncology hospital) or another medical organization providing medical care to cancer patients, including one subordinate to a federal executive body (hereinafter referred to as a federal medical organization), to clarify the diagnosis (if establishing the diagnosis is impossible, including the extent of the oncological process and disease stage), determine treatment tactics, and in the presence of medical indications for specialized, including high-tech, medical care.
For oncological diseases included in ICD-10 categories C37, C38, C40–C41, C45–C49, C58, D39, C62, C69–C70, C72, C74, as well as those corresponding to the codes of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O), 3rd Edition 8936, 906-909, 8247/3, 8013/3, 8240/3, 8244/3, 8246/3, 8249/3, an oncologist at an oncological dispensary (oncological hospital) or other medical organization providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases shall organize a consultation or a medical board (consilium), including via telemedicine technologies, at federal state budgetary institutions subordinate to the Russian Ministry of Health that provide medical care (hereinafter referred to as national medical research centers for the purposes of this Procedure), in order to determine the treatment tactics.
In complex clinical cases, to clarify the diagnosis (in the event of the impossibility of establishing the diagnosis, including the extent of the oncological process and the stage of the disease) for the purpose of evaluation, interpretation, and description of the results, the oncologist shall arrange for the referral of:
digital images obtained from pathomorphological studies to the pathoanatomical bureau (department) of the fourth group (reference center) [1] via information interaction, including the use of telemedicine technologies for remote interaction between medical personnel;
of digital images obtained from diagnostic imaging methods to the remote diagnostic imaging consultation center via information interaction, including the use of telemedicine technologies for remote interaction between medical workers;
biopsy (surgical) material for repeated pathomorphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic studies: to the pathoanatomical bureau (department) of the fourth group (reference center), as well as to molecular genetic laboratories for molecular genetic testing.
Treatment tactics are established by a medical board (consilium) comprising oncologists, a radiation therapist, and a neurosurgeon (in cases of nervous system tumors) of the medical organization that includes departments of surgical methods for treating malignant neoplasms, antineoplastic drug therapy, and radiotherapy (hereinafter referred to as the oncological consilium), including an oncological consilium conducted using telemedicine technologies, with the involvement of other specialist physicians when necessary.
Dispensary follow-up by an oncologist for a patient with a diagnosed oncological disease is established and carried out in accordance with the procedure for dispensary observation of adults with oncological diseases.
For accounting purposes, information about a newly diagnosed case of an oncological disease is sent within 3 working days by the oncologist of the medical organization where the corresponding diagnosis was established to the oncological dispensary or the organization of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation that performs the registration of patients with newly diagnosed malignant neoplasms, including through the use of the Unified State Health Information System. If the presence of an oncological disease is confirmed in a patient, information about the refined diagnosis is sent from the oncological dispensary or the organization of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation that performs the registration of patients with newly diagnosed malignant neoplasms to the medical organization providing clinical follow-up of the patient.
Specialized, including high-tech, medical care in medical organizations providing medical care to the adult population for oncological diseases is provided based on medical indications stipulated by the regulations on organizing the provision of specialized, including high-tech, medical care.
Specialized medical care, excluding high-tech medical care, in medical organizations subordinate to federal executive authorities is provided based on medical indications provided for in clause 5 of the procedure for referring patients to medical organizations and other organizations subordinate to federal executive authorities to provide specialized (excluding high-tech) medical care, stipulated in the appendix to the regulations on organizing the provision of specialized, including high-tech, medical care. (Clause 5: to receive specialized medical care on a planned basis, the federal medical organization is chosen upon the referral of the attending physician.) If several federal medical organizations participating in the implementation of the Program provide specialized medical care for diseases and conditions (group of diseases and conditions) corresponding to the patient's diseases and conditions (group of diseases and conditions), the attending physician is obliged to inform the patient (the patient's legal representative) about the possibility of choosing a federal medical organization, including the potential waiting times for specialized medical care, which may exceed the waiting times established by the program of state guarantees of free provision of medical care to citizens.
The waiting time for the provision of specialized (excluding high-tech) medical care must not exceed the timeframe established in the program of state guarantees of free medical care for citizens, approved by the Government of the Russian Federation, which is 7 working days.
If a patient with an oncological disease has medical indications for medical rehabilitation, the oncologist arranges for it to be provided in accordance with the procedure for organizing adult medical rehabilitation.
If a patient with an oncological disease has medical indications for sanatorium-resort treatment, the oncologist arranges for it in accordance with the procedure for organizing sanatorium-resort treatment.
Palliative medical care for a patient with oncological diseases is provided in accordance with the regulations on organizing the provision of palliative medical care, including the procedure for interaction between medical organizations, social service organizations, and public associations and other non-profit organizations operating in the field of health protection.
If an oncological disease is suspected and/or detected in a patient during the provision of emergency medical care, the patient is transferred or referred to medical organizations providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases to determine management tactics and the need for additional other methods of specialized antitumor treatment.
Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization in an emergency or urgent form are:
1) the presence of complications of the oncological disease requiring the provision of specialized medical care in an emergency and urgent form;
2) presence of complications of oncological disease treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, drug therapy, etc.) requiring the provision of specialized medical care in an emergency and urgent form
Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization in a planned form are:
1) the need to perform complex interventional diagnostic medical procedures, as well as endoscopic examinations when they cannot be performed on an outpatient basis, requiring subsequent monitoring in an inpatient or day hospital setting;
2) the presence of indications for specialized antitumor treatment (surgical intervention, RT, including contact, EBRD and other types of RT, drug therapy, etc.) requiring monitoring in an inpatient or day hospital setting.
Indications for discharging a patient from a medical organization are:
1) completion of a course of treatment or one of the stages of providing specialized, including high-tech, medical care in an inpatient or day hospital setting, provided there are no treatment complications requiring drug correction and/or medical interventions in an inpatient setting;
2) refusal by the patient or their legal representative of specialized, including high-tech, medical care in an inpatient or day hospital setting established by the concilium of the medical organization providing cancer care
3) in cases of non-compliance by the patient with prescriptions or the internal regulations of the medical and prophylactic institution, provided this does not threaten the patient's life and the health of others;
4) the need to transfer the patient to another medical organization according to the relevant medical specialty profile.
The conclusion on the advisability of transferring a patient to a specialized medical organization is made after a preliminary consultation on the provided medical documents and/or a preliminary examination of the patient by specialist physicians of the medical organization to which the transfer is planned.
7. Additional Information
No additional information available.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria | Performance evaluation |
|---|---|---|
1 | Blood tumor markers CA125, HE4, inhibin B, and AFP were assessed (at the diagnostic stage). | Yes/No |
2 | Comprehensive abdominal ultrasound and/or contrast-enhanced abdominal CT and/or contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI and/or whole-body PET-CT with tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals were performed (at the diagnostic stage). | Yes/No |
3 | Comprehensive pelvic ultrasound (transvaginal and transabdominal) and/or contrast-enhanced pelvic MRI and/or contrast-enhanced pelvic CT and/or whole-body PET-CT with tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals were performed (at the diagnostic stage). | Yes/No |
4 | Chest CT or chest X-ray or whole-body PET-CT with tumor-tropic radiopharmaceuticals was performed (at the diagnostic stage). | Yes/No |
5 | Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed (at the diagnostic stage). | Yes/No |
6 | Cytological examination of a smear from the cervix and cervical canal was performed (at the diagnostic stage). | Yes/No |
7 | Cytological examination of peritoneal fluid, if present, obtained by puncture/aspiration or intraoperatively was performed (at diagnosis). | Yes/No |
8 | Pathological examination of surgical (biopsy) material was performed (in case of surgical intervention). | Yes/No |
9 | Chemotherapy, and/or hormonotherapy, and/or targeted therapy, and/or radiotherapy were administered, taking into account indications, the stage of ovarian cancer, and morphological verification of the tumor. | Yes/No |
References
Show references
Gatta G., van der Zwan J.M., Casali P.G. et al. Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer 2011;47:2493–511.
Prat J. Ovarian sex cord-stromal and steroid cell tumors (Chapter 28). In: Mutter G.L., Prat J., editors. Pathology of the Female Reproductive Tract. 3rd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone (Elsevier); 2014.
Gardener G.J., Reidy-Lagunes D., Gehrig P.A. et al. Neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecological tract: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) clinical document. Gynecol Oncol 2011;122(1):190–8.
Gershenson D.M. Current advances in the management of malignant germ cell and sex cord-stromal tumors of the ovary. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125:515–7.
Lane A.H., Lee M.M., Fuller A.F.Jr et al. Diagnostic utility of Mullerian inhibiting substance determination in patients with primary and recurrent granulosa cell tumors. Gynecol Oncol 1999;73:51–5.
Tryakin A.A. Medical and combined treatment of non-seminomatous germ cell tumors in men. Dr. Med. Sci. Diss. Moscow; 2015: 254 p.
de Wit R., Roberts J.T., Wilkinson P.M. et al. Equivalence of Three or Four Cycles of Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin Chemotherapy and of a 3- or 5-Day Schedule in Good-Prognosis Germ Cell Cancer: A randomized trial of EORTC and MRC. J Clin Oncol 2001;1629–40.
Matei D., Brown J., Frazier L. Updates in the management of ovarian germ cell tumors. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2013;e210.
Brown J., Friedlander M., Backes F.J. et al. Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) consensus review for ovarian germ cell tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014;24(9 Suppl 3):S48–54.
Vazquez I., Rustin G.J. Current controversies in the management of germ cell ovarian tumours. Curr Opin Oncol 2013;25:539–45.
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ovarian cancer including fallopian tube cancer and primary teritoneal cancer. Version 1.2019. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physi-cian_gls/pdf/ovarian.pdf.
Vazquez I., Rustin G.J. Current controversies in the management of germ cell ovarian tumours. Curr Opin Oncol 2013;25:539–45.
Wilson M.K., Fong P., Mesnage S. et al. Stage I granulosa cell tumours: a management conundrum? Results of long-term follow up. Gynecol Oncol 2015;138:285–91.
Prat J., Cao D., Carinelli S. et al. Teratoma (Chapter 1: Tumours of the ovary). In: Kurman R.J., Carcangiu M.L., Herrington C.S., Young R.H., editors. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. 4th ed. IARC: Lyon; 2014. p. 57–62.
Low J.J., Perrin L.C., Crandon A.J., Hacker N.F. Conservative surgery to preserve ovarian function in patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. A review of 74 cases. Cancer 2000;89:391–8.
Chekini D.A. Prognostic factors and treatment tactics in patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. Cand. Med. Sci. Diss. Moscow; 2017: 140 p.
Billmire D., Vinocur C., Rescorla F. et al. Outcome and staging evaluation in malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary in children and adolescents: an Intergroup study. J Pediatr Surg 2004;39:424–9.
Solheim O., Kærn J., Trope C.G. et al. Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: presentation, survival and second cancer in a population based Norwegian cohort (1953–2009). Gynecol Oncol 2013;131:330–5.
De Giorgi U., Pupi A., Florentini G. et al. FDG-PET in the management of germ cell tumor. Ann Oncol 2005;16Supple4:90–4.
Lambertini M., Ceppi M., Poggio F. et al. Ovarian suppression using luteinizing hormone–releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function and fertility of breast cancer patients: a metaanalysis of randomized studies. Ann Oncol 2015;26:2408–19.
Brown J., Shvartsman H.S., Deavers M.T. et al. The activity of taxanes in the treatment of sex cord-stromal ovarian tumors. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3517–23.
Mangili G., Sigismondi C., Lorusso D. et al. The role of staging and adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGTs): the MITO-9 study. Ann Oncol 2017;28:333–8.
Low J.J., Perrin L.C., Crandon A.J., Hacker N.F. Conservative surgery to preserve ovarian function in patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors. A review of 74 cases. Cancer 2000;89:391–8.
Callegaro-Filho D., Gershenson D.M., Nick A.M. et al. Small cell carcinoma of the ovary-hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT): a review of 47 cases. Gynecol Oncol 2016;140:53–7.
van Meurs H.S., van Lonkhuijzen L.R., Limpens J. et al. Hormone therapy in ovarian granulosa cell tumors: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2014;134:196–205.
NCT01770301. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01770301 (12 March 2018, date last accessed).
Bristow R.E., Tomacruz R.S., Armstrong D.K. et al. Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1248–59.
Mangili G., Sigismondi C., Lorusso D. et al. The role of staging and adjuvant chemotherapy in stage I malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGTs): the MITO-9 study. Ann Oncol 2017;28:333–8.
Tandstad T., Cavallin-Stahl E., Dahl O. et al. One course of adjuvant BEP in clinical stage I, nonseminoma: Mature and expanded results from the SWENOTECA group. J Clin Oncol 2013;31(suppl):4553.
De la Motte Rouge T., Pautier P., Genestie C. et al. Prognostic significance of an early decline in serum alpha-fetoprotein during chemotherapy for ovarian yolk sac tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2016;142:452–7.
Matei D., Brown J., Frazier L. Updates in the management of ovarian germ cell tumors. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2013;e210.
Davydova I.Yu. Immature ovarian teratomas (clinical and morphological features, treatment). Diss. ... Dr. of Med. Sci. M.; 2001. P. 265–285.
Nasioudis D., Kanninen T.T., Holcomb K. et al. Prevalence of lymph node metastasis and prognostic significance of lymphadenectomy in apparent early-stage malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors. Gynecol Oncol 2017;145:243–7.
Champion V., Williams S.D., Miller A. et al. Quality of life in long-term survivors of ovarian germ cell tumors: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105:687–94.
Albers P. Randomized phase III trial comparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection with one course of bleomycin and etoposide plus cisplatin chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of clinical stage I NSGCT: AUO trial AH 01/94 by the German Testicular Cancer Study. J Clin Oncol 2008;26(18):2966–72.
Billmire D.F., Cullen J.W., Rescorla F.J. et al. Surveillance after initial surgery for pediatric and adolescent girls with stage I ovarian germ cell tumors: report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:465–70.
Mangili G., Sigismondi C., Gadducci A. et al. Outcome and risk factors for recurrence in malignant ovarian germ cell tumors: a MITO–9 retrospective study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011;21:1414–21.
Brown J., Friedlander M., Backes F.J. et al. Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) consensus review for ovarian germ cell tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014;24(9 Suppl 3):S48–54.
Dark G.G., Bower M., Newlands E.S. et al. Surveillance policy for stage I ovarian germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:620–4.
Pectasides D., Pectasides E., Kassanos D. Germ cell tumors of the ovary. Cancer Treat Rev 2008;34:427–41.
Williams S.D. Current management of ovarian germ cell tumors. Oncology (Williston Park) 1994;8:53–60.
Williams S.D., Kauderer J., Burnett A.F. et al. Adjuvant therapy of completely resected dysgerminoma with carboplatin and etoposide: a trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 2004;95:496–9.
Loehrer P.J.Sr., Lauer R., Roth B.J. et al. Salvage therapy in reccurent germ cell cancer: ifosfamide and cisplatin plus either vinblastine or etoposide. Ann Intern Med 1988;109:540–6.
Einhorn L.H. Chemotherapeutic and surgical strategies for germ cell tumors. Chest Surg Clin N Am 2002;12:695–706.
: Gutorov S.L., Novikova E.G., Rumyantsev A.A., Tryakin A.A., Tyulyandina A.S., Urmancheeva A.F. et al. Practical guidelines for the drug treatment of malignant non-epithelial ovarian tumors. RUSSCO Practical Guidelines, part 1. Malignant Tumors, 2023 (vol. 13), #3s2, pp. 216–234.
Motzer R.J., Sheinfeld J., Mazumdar M. et al. Paclitaxel, Ifosfamide, and Cisplatin Second–Line Therapy for Patients With Relapsed Testicular Germ Cell Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2000;18(12):2413–8.
Mead G.M., Cullen M.H., Huddart R. et al. A phase II trial of TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin) given as second-line (post-BEP) salvage chemotherapy for patients with metastatic germ cell cancer: a medical research council trial. Br J Cancer 2005;93:178–84.
Loehrer P.J., Gonin R., Nichols C.R. et al. Vinblastine plus ifosfamide plus cisplatin as initial salvage therapy in recurrent germ cell tumor. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2500–4.
Ferlay J., Steliarova-Foucher E., Lortet-Tieulent J. et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 2013 Apr;49(6):1374–403.
Tyulyandin S.A. Ovarian germ cell tumors. Practical Oncology 2006;7(1):52–61.
Tewari K.S., Di Saia P.J. Ovulatory failure, fertility preservation and reproductive strategies in the setting of gynecologic and non–gynecologic malignancies. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2006;27:449–61.
Kollmannsberger C., Beyer J., Liersch R. et al. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin in patients with intensively pretreated or refractory germ cell cancer: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:108–14.
Bokemeyer C, Oechsle K, Honecker F, et al. Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with cisplatin-refractory or multiply relapsed germcell tumors: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. Ann Oncol 2008;19:448–53.
Tomao F., Peccatori F., Del Pup L. et al. Special issues in fertility preservation for gynecologic malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016;97:206–19.
Allen J.C., Kirschner A., Scarpato K.R., Morgans A.K. Current management of refractory germ cell tumors and future directions. Curr Oncol Rep 2017;19:8.
Gershenson D.M. Treatment of ovarian cancer in young women. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012;55:65–74.
Wilson M.K., Fong P., Mesnage S. et al. Stage I granulosa cell tumours: a management conundrum? Results of long-term follow up. Gynecol Oncol 2015;138:285–91.
Tao X., Sood A.K., Deavers M.T. et al. Anti-angiogenisis therapy with bevacizumab for patients with ovarian granulosa cell tumour. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114:431–6.
Ray-Coquard I., Brown J., Harter P. et al. Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) consensus review for ovarian sex cord stromal tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014;24(9Suppl3):S42–7.
Brown J., Shvartsman H.S., Deavers M.T. et al. The activity of taxanes in the treatment of sex cord–stromal ovarian tumors. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3517–23.
Homesley H.D., Bundy B.N., Hurteau J.A. et al. Bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin combination therapy of ovarian granulosa cell tumors and other stromal malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 1999;72:131–7.
Gurumurthy M., Bryant A., Shnbhang S. et al. Effectiveness of different treatment modalities for the management of adult-onset granulosa cell tumours of the ovary. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;4.
Silver J.A., Baima J. Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatmentrelated morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013;92(8):715−27.
Nilsson H., Angerås U., Bock D. et al. Is preoperative physical activity related to post–surgery recovery? BMJ Open 2016;6(1):e007997. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen–2015–007997.
Hijazi Y., Gondal U., Aziz O. et al. A systematic review of prehabilitation programs in abdominal cancer surgery. Int J Surg 2017;39:156−62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.111.
Tsimopoulou I., Pasquali S., Howard R. et al. Psychological prehabilitation before cancer surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22(13):4117−23. DOI: 10.1245/s10434–015–4550–z.
Carter J. Fast-Track Surgery in Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology: A Review of a Rolling Clinical Audit. ISRN Surg 2012;2012(368014):19.
Nelson G., Bakkum-Gamez J., Kalogera E. et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations − 2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019.
De Almeida E.P.M., de Almeida J.P., Landoni G. et al. Early mobilization programme improves functional capacity after major abdominal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth 2017;119(5):900−7.
Wren S.M., Martin M., Yoon J.K., Bech F. Postoperative pneumonia-prevention program for the inpatient surgical ward. J Am Coll Surg 2010;210(4):491–5.
Peedicayil A., Weaver A., Li X., Carey E. et al. Incidence and timing of venous thromboembolism after surgery for gynecological cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2011;121(1):64–9.
Swarm R., Abernethy A.P., Anghelescu D.L. et al. NCCN Adult Cancer Pain. Adult cancer pain. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010;8:1046–86.
Ben-Arye E., Samuels N., Lavie O. Integrative medicine for female patients with gynecologic cancer. J Altern Complement Med 2018;24(9,10):881–9.
Goerling U., Jaeger C., Walz A. et al. The efficacy of psycho-oncological interventions for women with gynaecological cancer: a randomized study. Oncology 2014;87:114–24.
Smits A., Lopes A., Bekkers R. et al. Body mass index and the quality of life of endometrial cancer survivors − a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2015;137:180–7. DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.540.
Schmitz K.H., Courneya K.S., Matthews C. et al. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010;42(7):1409–26.
Zhou Y., Chlebowski R., La Monte M.J. et al. Body mass index, physical activity, and mortality in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer: results from the Women"s Health Initiative. Gynecol Oncol 2014;133(1):4–10.
Biglia N., Zanfagnin V., Daniele A. et al. Lower body lymphedema in patients with gynecologic cancer. Anticancer Res 2017;37(8):4005–15.
Shaitelman S.F., Cromwell K.D., Rasmussen J.C., Stout N.L., Armer J.M., Lasinski B.B., Cormier J.N. Recent progress in the treatment and prevention of cancer-related lymphedema. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):55-81. doi: 10.3322/caac.21253. Epub 2014 Nov 19. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 May-Jun;65(3):252. PubMed PMID: 25410402; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4808814.
Borman Р. Lymphedema diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up from the view point of physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2018;64(3):179–197.
Piller N., Douglass J., Heidenreich B., Moseley A. Placebo controlled trial of mild electrical stimulation. Journal of Lymphoedema. – 2010. – Vol 5, No 1. – P. 15–25.
Grushina T.I. Rehabilitation in Oncology: Physiotherapy. – Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2006. – 240 p.
McNeely M.L., Peddle C.J., Yurick J.L., Dayes I.S., Mackey J.R. Conservative and dietary interventions for cancer‐related lymphedema: A Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;117(6):1136–48.
Zhang Y.L., Huiling L., Yan L., Li H., Tian B. Effects of acupuncture on cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis // Supportive Care in Cancer. – 2018. – V. 26, Issue 2. – Pp. 415–425.
Carmody J.F., Crawford S., Salmoirago-Blotcher E., Leung K., Churchill L., Olendzki N. Mindfulness training for coping with hot flashes: results of a randomized trial. Menopause. 2011 June;18(6):611–20. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318204a05c.
Ferrandina G., Petrillo M., Mantegna G., Fuoco G., Terzano S., Venditti L., Marcellusi A., De Vincenzo R., Scambia G. Evaluation of quality of life and emotional distress in endometrial cancer patients: a 2-year prospective, longitudinal study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jun;133(3):518-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.015.
Donoyama N., Satoh T., Hamano T. et al. Physical effects of Anma therapy (Japanese massage) for gynecologic cancer survivors: A randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Oncol 2016;142:531–538. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar.
Armbruster S.D., Song J., Bradford A. et al. Sexual health of endometrial cancer survivors before and after a physical activity intervention: A retrospective cohort analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2016;143:589–595. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar.
Huffman L.B., Hartenbach E.M., Carter J., Rash J.K., Kushner D.M. Maintaining sexual health throughout gynecologic cancer survivorship: A comprehensive review and clinical guide. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):359-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 7. PubMed PMID: 26556768; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4835814.
Dumoulin C., Cacciari L.P., Hay‐Smith E.J.C. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018, Issue 10.
Hu H., Xie Z.G., Qin W.L. Effect of electroacupuncture intervention at different phases of post-operation on bladder function in patients undergoing cervical cancer operation. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu 2013;38:64–67, 77. Medline, Google Scholar.
Cannioto R.A., Moysich K.B. Epithelial ovarian cancer and recreational physical activity: A review of the epidemiological literature and implications for exercise prescription. Gynecol Oncol, 2015. 137(3): P. 559–73.
Hu M., Lin W. Effects of exercise training on red blood cell production: implications for anemia. Acta Haematol. 2012;127(3):156–64. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
Mustian K.M., Alfano C.M., Heckler C. et al: Comparison of pharmaceutical, psychological, and exercise treatments for cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:961–968.
Lawvere, Silvana. (2002). The effect of massage therapy in ovarian cancer patients. 10.1016/B978-0-7234-3217-3.50009-0.
Kinkead B., Schettler P.J., Larson E.R., Carroll D., Sharenko M., Nettles J., Edwards S.A., Miller A.H1., Torres M.A., Dunlop B.W., Rakofsky J.J., Rapaport M.H. Massage therapy decreases cancer-related fatigue: Results from a randomized early phase trial. Cancer. 2018 Feb 1;124(3):546–554. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31064.
Streckmann F., Zopf E.M., Lehmann H.C. et al: Exercise intervention studies in patients with peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review. Sports Med 2014;44:1289–1304.
Kleckner I.R., Kamen C., Gewandter J.S. et al. Effects of exercise during chemotherapy on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 2018;26:1019–1028.
Muzi J.L., Look R.M., Turner C., Gardiner S.K., Wagie T., Douglas J., Sorenson L., Evans L., Kirchner S., Dashkoff C., Garrett K., Johnson N. Low-level laser therapy for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 30, no. 15_suppl (May 2012) 9019–9019.
Rick O., von Hehn U., Mikus E., Dertinger H. & Geiger G. (2016). Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics-induced polyneuropathy: A prospective randomized placebo-controlled phase-III study. Bioelectromagnetics, 38(2), 85–94.
Kılınç M., Livanelioğlu A., Yıldırım S.A., Tan E. Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with peripheral and central neuropathic pain. J Rehabil Med. 2014 May;46(5):454-60. doi: 10.2340/16501977–1271.
Oberoi S., Zamperlini-Netto G., Beyene J., Treister N.S., Sung L. Effect of prophylactic low level laser therapy on oral mucositis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Send to PLoS One. 2014 Sep 8;9(9):e107418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107418. eCollection 2014.
Ross M., Fischer-Cartlidge E. Scalp Cooling: A Literature Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability for Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Apr 1;21(2):226-233. doi: 10.1188/17.CJON.226-233 .
Avci P., Gupta G.K., Clark J., Wikonkal N. & Hamblin M.R. (2013). Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss. Lasers in surgery and medicine, 46(2), 144–51.
Spence Rosalind R. et al. Exercise and cancer rehabilitation: A systematic review. Cancer Treatment Reviews. – V. 36, Issue 2. – P. 185–194.
Park S, Lee S, Lee J, Park SH, Park JO, Kang WK, Park YS, Lim HY. Salvage chemotherapy with paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) in relapsed or cisplatin-refractory germ cell tumors. Onkologie. 2011;34(8-9):416-20. doi: 10.1159/000331129.
Tohya, T. Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumor, unclassified: case report of endocrinologic findings and review of the literature. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2005, 15(6), 1153–1155.
Shaaban A. M. et al. Ovarian malignant germ cell tumors: cellular classification and clinical and imaging features //Radiographics. – 2014. – T. 34. – №. 3. – С. 777-801.
Khokhlova S. V., Davydova I. Yu., Novikova E. G., Teletaeva G. M., Tryakin A. A., Urmancheeva A. F. Practical guidelines for the drug treatment of non-epithelial ovarian tumors // Malignant Tumors. – 2016. – № 4. Special issue 2. – С. 135–146.
Johansen G. et al. Fertility-sparing surgery for treatment of non-epithelial ovarian cancer: Oncological and reproductive outcomes in a prospective nationwide population-based cohort study //Gynecologic oncology. – 2019. – T. 155. – №. 2. – С. 287-293.
Dark G. G. et al. Surveillance policy for stage I ovarian germ cell tumors //Journal of clinical oncology. – 1997. – Т. 15. – №. 2. – С. 620-624.
Oliver RT, Mead GM, Rustin GJ et al Rindomized trial of carboplatin versus radiotherapy for stade I seminoma: mature results on relapse and contralaterated testis cancer rates in MRS TE19/EORTC 30982 study. JCO 2011; 29: 957-962.
Satoh T. et al. Administration of standard-dose BEP regimen (bleomycin+ etoposide+ cisplatin) is essential for treatment of ovarian yolk sac tumour //European journal of cancer. – 2015. – Т. 51. – №. 3. – С. 340-351.
Bosl, G. J., Geller, N. L., Bajorin, D., Leitner, S. P., Yagoda, A., Golbey, R. B., … Whitmore, W. (1989). A Randomized Trial of Etoposide + Cisplatin Versus Vinblastine + Bleomycin + Cisplatin + Cyclophosphamide + Dactinomycin in Patients with Good-Prognosis Germ Cell Tumors. The Journal of Urology, 141(6), 1499–1500. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)41358-9.
Khokhlova S.V., Davydova I.Yu., Kolomiets L.A., Kuznetsov V.V., Novikova E.G., Tryakin A.A. et al. Practical guidelines for the drug treatment of malignant non-epithelial ovarian tumors. Malignant Tumors : RUSSCO Practical Guidelines #3s2, 2019 (vol. 9). P. 177–191.
Pico, J.-L., Rosti, G., Kramar, A., Wandt, H., Koza, V., Salvioni, R., … Biron, P. (2005). A randomised trial of high-dose chemotherapy in the salvage treatment of patients failing first-line platinum chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumours. Annals of Oncology, 16(7), 1152–1159. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdi228.
Pautier P1, Gutierrez-Bonnaire M, Rey A et al. Combination of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin for the treatment of advanced ovarian granulosa cell tumors. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 May-Jun;18(3):446-52.
Stenman U. H. et al. Markers supplementing CA 125 in ovarian cancer //Annals of medicine. – 1995. – Т. 27. – №. 1. – С. 115-120.
Yesilyurt H. et al. Parameters for predicting granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: a single center retrospective comparative study //Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. – 2014. – Т. 15. – №. 19. – С. 8447-8450.
Tohya, T. Ovarian sex cord-stromal tumor, unclassified: case report of endocrinologic findings and review of the literature. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2005, 15(6), 1153–1155.
Tryakin A, Fedyanin M, Bulanov A, Kashia S, Kurmukov I, Matveev V, Fainstein I, Gordeeva O, Zakharova T, Tjulandin S. Dose-reduced first cycle of chemotherapy for prevention of life-threatening acute complications in nonseminomatous germ cell tumor patients with ultra high tumor markers and/or poor performance status. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep;144(9):1817-1823. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2695-4.
Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA et al. 2010 Update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 2011; 47: 8–32.
Khokhlova S. V., Davydova I. Yu., Kolomiets L. A., Kravets O. A., Krikunova L. I., Kuznetsov V. V. et al. Practical guidelines for the drug treatment of non-epithelial ovarian tumors // Malignant Tumors. – 2015. – № 4, special issue. – С. 127–138. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2015-4s-127-138
S. A. Tyulyandin, D. A. Nosov, N. I. Perevodchikova. Minimum Clinical Guidelines of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) — M.: Publishing Group of the N.N. Blokhin NCO RAMS, 2010.— 436 p.
Khokhlova S. V., Davydova I. Yu., Kolomiets L. A., Novikova E. G., Tryakin A. A., Urmancheeva A. F. Practical guidelines for the drug treatment of malignant non-epithelial ovarian tumors // Malignant Tumors : RUSSCO Practical Guidelines #3s2, 2017 (vol. 7). P. 146–157.
Colombo, N., Peiretti, M., Garbi, A., Carinelli, S., Marini, C., & Sessa, C. (2012). Non-epithelial ovarian cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology, 23(suppl 7), vii20–vii26. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds223
Hardy R.D., Bell J.G., Nicely C.J. et al.Hormonal treatment of a recurrent granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 2005;96(3):865865
Samant R., Fung M.F., Choan E. et al.Palliative radiotherapy for recurrent granulose cell tumor of the ovary: a report of 3 cases with radiological evidence of response. Gynecol Oncol 2006;102(2):406:406
Elmanov A.V. et al. Ovarian granulosa cell tumor with multiple skin metastases (clinical case). / Siberian Oncology Journal. 2011. N5 (47)
Kourie HR et al. Letrozole efficacy in the treatment of granulosa cell tumor of the ovary: a case report/ Onkologie. 2013;36(9):498-500. doi: 10.1159/000354635. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
Freeman SA, Modesitt SC: Anastrozole therapy in recurrent ovarian adult granulosa cell tumors: a report of 2 cases. Gynecol Oncol 2006;103:755-8.
Kauppila A GnRH agonist analog therapy in advanced/recurrent granulosa cell tumors: further evidence of a role of inhibin in monitoring response to treatment Gynecol Endocrinol. 1992 Dec;6(4):271-4.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Ashrafyan L.A., Academician of the RAS, Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, Deputy Director of the V.I. Kulakovskiy National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Director of the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology.
Novikova E.G., Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Department of Oncogynecology at the P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Khokhlova S.V., Dr. of Med. Sci., Head of the Department of Antineoplastic Drug Therapy, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Urmancheeva A.F., Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, Leading Researcher at the Department of Oncogynecology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Berlev I.V., Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Scientific Department of Oncogynecology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Antonova I.B., Dr. of Med. Sci., Head of the Laboratory for Prevention, Early Diagnosis and Combined Treatment of Oncological Diseases, Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenology and Radiology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Babaeva N.A., Dr. of Med. Sci., Leading Researcher at the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, Oncologist at the Oncological Department of Surgical Treatment Methods, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Aleshikova O.I., Cand. of Med. Sci., Senior Researcher at the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, Oncologist at the Oncological Department of Surgical Treatment Methods, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Mukhtarullina S.V., Dr. of Med. Sci., Head of the Department of Oncogynecology, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Verenikina E.V., Cand. of Med. Sci., Head of the Department of Oncogynecology, Rostov Research Institute of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Demidova L.V., Dr. of Med. Sci., Leading Researcher at the Department of Radiation Therapy, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Shevchuk A.S., Cand. of Med. Sci., Head of the Department of Combined and Radiation Treatment Methods for Oncogynecological Diseases, Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Ulrich E.A., Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, Chief Researcher at the Research Laboratory of Reproductive Technologies, Head of the "Oncofertility" Competence Center, V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center.
Krasilnikov S.E., Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, Director of the Institute of Oncology and Neurosurgery, Oncologist, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Davydova I.Yu., Dr. of Med. Sci., Leading Researcher at the Department of Pelvic Floor Oncosurgery, A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Krikunova L.I., Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Department of Radiation and Combined Treatment Methods for Gynecological Diseases, National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Kolomiets L.A., Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor, Head of the Gynecological Department, Research Institute of Oncology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the RAS.
Kreynina Yu.M., Dr. of Med. Sci., Leading Researcher at the Laboratory of Innovative Technologies in Radiotherapy and Chemoradiation Treatment of Malignant Neoplasms, Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenology and Radiology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Dubinina A.V., Cand. of Med. Sci., Senior Researcher at the Department of Radiotherapy, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Karseladze A.I., Professor, Dr. of Med. Sci., V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Rubtsova N.A., Dr. of Med. Sci., Head of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Radiologist, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Bychenko V.G., Cand. of Med. Sci., Head of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Solopova A.E., Dr. of Med. Sci., Associate Professor, Radiologist at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Ryzhkova D.V., Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor of the RAS, Head of the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Technologies with Clinic, Chief Researcher at the Research Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Ovodenko D.L., Dr. of Med. Sci., Head of the Department of Innovative Oncology and Gynecology, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Grinevich V.N., Cand. of Med. Sci., Head of the Department of Oncopathology, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Snegovoy A.V., Dr. of Med. Sci., Head of the Outpatient Chemotherapy Day Hospital Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Meshcheryakova L.A., Oncogynaecologist, Dr. of Med. Sci., Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine named after Yu.M. Lopukhin of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency.
Slonov A.V., Cand. of Med. Sci., Chief Medical Officer, Clinical Hospital No. 123 of the Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine named after Yu.M. Lopukhin of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency.
Rumyantsev A.A., MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Antitumor Drug Therapy No. 4, Department of Drug Treatment, National Medical Research Center of Oncology named after N.N. Blokhin of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow
Yureneva S.V., Deputy Director for Science, Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Dr. of Med. Sci., Professor at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Medical Rehabilitation Section
Konchugova T.V., MD, PhD, Professor, Physiotherapist, Head of the Department of Preformed Physical Factors, National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Eremushkin M.A., MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Exercise Therapy and Clinical Biomechanics, National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Gilmutdinova I.R., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Biomedical Technologies and Cell Technologies Laboratory, Transfusiologist, Dermatovenerologist, Cell Technology Specialist, National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Bulanov A.A., MD, PhD, Senior Researcher at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Butenko A.V., MD, PhD, Professor, Chief Physician of the Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chairman of the Scientific Council of the Association of Oncological Rehabilitation Specialists.
Nazarenko A.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Highest Qualification Category Physician, Head of the Radiology Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Therapeutic Radiation Oncologists (RATRO), European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO), Russian-American Cancer Alliance (ARCA), Russian Representative to the IAEA.
Obukhova O.A., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Physiotherapist, Head of the Rehabilitation Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), Russian Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (RESPEN).
Khulamkhanova M.M., Physiotherapist, Oncologist at the Rehabilitation Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Tkachenko G.A., Psychologist at the Rehabilitation Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Petrova T.A., Speech Therapist and Educator at the Rehabilitation Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Semiglazova T.Yu., MD, PhD, Leading Researcher at the Scientific Department of Innovative Methods of Therapeutic Oncology and Rehabilitation, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Associate Professor at the Department of Oncology, I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Ponomarenko G.N., MD, PhD, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Director General of the G.A. Albrecht Federal Scientific Center of Rehabilitation of the Disabled of the Russian Ministry of Labour, Head of the Department of Balneology and Physiotherapy, S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Russian Ministry of Defense.
Kovlen D.V., MD, PhD, Associate Professor at the Department of Balneology and Physiotherapy, S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Russian Ministry of Defense.
Kasparov B.S., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Deputy Chief Physician for Outpatient Care, Head of the Clinical and Diagnostic Department, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Krutov A.A., Oncologist at the Clinical and Diagnostic Department, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Zernova M.A., Exercise Therapy Instructor, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Kondratyeva K.O., Medical Psychologist, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Ivanova G.E., DSc, Chief Specialist in Medical Rehabilitation, Russian Ministry of Health; Head of the Department of Medical and Social Stroke Rehabilitation, Research Institute of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Rehabilitation, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Russian Ministry of Health.
Romanov A.I., Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, DSc, Professor, Chief Physician, Rehabilitation Center, Administration of the President of the Russian Federation.
Filonenko E.V., MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Center for Laser and Photodynamic Diagnostics and Tumor Therapy, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health, Oncologist.
Stepanova A.M., Deputy Director for Science, Head of the Rehabilitation Department, Vosstanovlenie Private Multidisciplinary Diagnostic and Rehabilitation Center.
Healthcare Organization Section:
Nevolskikh A.A., DSc, Professor, Deputy Director for Clinical Work, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the National Medical Research Center for Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Khaylova Zh.V., PhD, Chief Physician of the Clinic, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the National Medical Research Center for Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Ivanov S.A., DSc, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the National Medical Research Center for Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Gevorkyan T.G., Deputy Director of the Research Institute of Clinical and Economic Radiology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology.
No conflicts of interest.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
oncologists;
surgeons;
radiologists;
medical students, resident physicians, clinical residents, and postgraduate students.
Table A1. Levels of Evidence (LoE) rating scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference-method control, or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design except randomized controlled trials incorporating meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without sequential reference-standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table A2. Levels of Evidence (LoE) rating scale for prevention, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural healing factors (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, excluding randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table A3. Grades of Recommendation (GoR) rating scale for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural healing factors (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Methods used for formulating recommendations: expert consensus.
Economic analysis
Cost analysis was not performed, and pharmacoeconomic publications were not analyzed.
Method of recommendation validation:
external expert review;
internal expert review.
Description of the recommendation validation method
The draft of these recommendations was reviewed by independent experts who were asked to comment primarily on whether the interpretation of the evidence underlying the recommendations is easy to understand.
Comments were received from primary care oncologists regarding the clarity of the presentation of the recommendations and their assessment of importance as a working tool in daily practice.
The comments received from experts were carefully systematized and discussed by the chairman and members of the working group. Each item was discussed, and the resulting changes to the recommendations were recorded. If no changes were made, the reasons for refusing to make changes were recorded.
Consultations and expert review: the draft recommendations were also reviewed by independent experts, who were asked to comment primarily on the clarity and accuracy of the interpretation of the evidence base underlying the recommendations.
For the final editing and quality control, the guidelines were re-analyzed by the members of the working group, who concluded that all comments and feedback from the experts had been taken into account, and the risk of systematic bias in the development of the guidelines was minimized.
Updates of clinical guidelines: revision is carried out at least once every 3 years taking into account new information on the diagnosis and management of patients with endometrial cancer, but no more frequently than once every 6 months. The decision to update is made by the Russian Ministry of Health based on proposals submitted by professional medical non-profit organizations. The generated proposals must take into account the results of comprehensive evaluation of medicinal products and medical devices, as well as the results of clinical approbation.
When selecting publications as potential sources of evidence, the methodology used in each study is examined to ensure its reliability. The result of this examination affects the level of evidence assigned to the publication, which in turn affects the strength of the recommendations derived from it.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Current instructions for medicinal products mentioned in these clinical guidelines can be found on the website http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru.
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Figure 1. Flowchart for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with sex cord-stromal tumors

Figure 2. Flowchart for the diagnosis and treatment of female patients with ovarian germ cell tumors
Appendix C. Patient Information
Recommended: in case of chemotherapy complications, contact your oncologist.
1. If body temperature rises to 38 °C or higher:
- Consult an oncologist to determine the advisability of starting antibiotic therapy
2. In case of stomatitis:
- diet: mechanically sparing,
- Consult a physician
- treat the oral cavity as recommended by the oncologist.
3. In case of diarrhea:
- diet: exclude fatty, spicy, smoked, sweet, dairy foods, and fiber. Lean meat, flour products, fermented milk products, and rice water are permitted. Drink plenty of fluids.
- Consult a physician
4. In case of nausea:
Consult a physician
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. WHO/ECOG Performance Status Scale
Russian title: WHO/ECOG Performance Status Scale.
Original title: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization Performance Status (ECOG/WHO PS)
Source (official developer website, validated publication): https://ecog-acrin.org/resources/ecog-performance-statushttps://ecog-acrin.org/resources/ecog-performance-status
Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP: Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982, 5(6):649-655
Type: rating scale
Purpose: to describe the patient's level of functioning in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activities, and physical abilities (walking, work, etc.).
Contents:
Score | Description |
|---|---|
0 | Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction |
1 | Patient is unable to do heavy work, but can carry out light or sedentary work (e.g., light housework or office work) |
2 | The patient is ambulatory, capable of self-care, but unable to work. Spends more than 50% of waking hours upright and active |
3 | The patient is capable of only limited self-care, confined to a bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours |
4 | Completely disabled; cannot carry on any self-care; totally confined to bed or chair |
5 | Dead |
Key (interpretation): provided within the scale itself
Appendix G2. Karnofsky Performance Scale
Name in Russian: Karnofsky Scale.
Original title (if applicable): KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE STATUS
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH: The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. edn. Edited by MacLeod C. New York: Columbia University Press; 1949: 191-205
Type: rating scale
Purpose: to describe the patient's level of functioning in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activities, and physical abilities (walking, work, etc.).
Content (template):
Karnofsky Performance Scale |
|---|
100 – Normal, no complaints 90 – Able to carry on normal activity; minor symptoms or signs of disease |
80 – Normal activity with effort; some symptoms or signs of disease 70 – Cares for self, but unable to carry on normal activity or to do active work |
60 – Requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for most of their personal needs 50 – Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care |
40 – Disabled, requires special care and assistance, including medical care 30 – Severely disabled, hospitalization indicated although death not imminent |
20 – Severely ill. Hospitalization and active treatment required 10 – Moribund |
0 – Death |
Key (interpretation): provided within the scale itself