List of Abbreviations
ICD-10 – International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision
TBI – traumatic brain injury
ATP – adenosine triphosphate
BBB – blood-brain barrier
Con – concussion
SCT – spiral computed tomography
GCS – Glasgow Coma Scale
DAI – diffuse axonal injury
ICP – intracranial pressure
DC – decompressive craniectomy
ICH – intracranial hypertension
US – ultrasound examination
Dura – dura mater
STBI – severe traumatic brain injury
AEH – acute epidural hematoma
CT – computed tomography
MRI – magnetic resonance imaging
ECG – electrocardiography
EEG – electroencephalography
Terms and Definitions
Evidence-based medicine is an approach to medical practice where decisions regarding the use of preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic measures are made based on available evidence of their efficacy and safety, and such evidence is sought, compared, synthesized, and widely disseminated for use in the best interest of patients.
Working group — two or more individuals of the same or different professions working together and in coordination to develop clinical guidelines and bearing joint responsibility for the results of this work. Condition — changes in the body arising from the impact of pathogenic and/or physiological factors and requiring medical care;
Level of certainty of evidence – reflects the degree of confidence that the found effect of a medical intervention is true.
Level of recommendation — reflects not only the degree of certainty regarding the reliability of the intervention's effect, but also the degree of certainty that following the recommendations will yield more benefit than harm in a given situation. Surgical intervention — an invasive procedure that may be used for diagnostic purposes and/or as a treatment method for diseases.
Standard — universally accepted principles of diagnosis and treatment that may be considered as mandatory therapeutic tactics (efficacy confirmed by multiple randomized trials, meta-analyses, or cohort clinical studies). Recommendation. Therapeutic and diagnostic measures recommended for use by the majority of experts on these issues. May be considered as treatment choices in specific clinical situations (efficacy confirmed by individual randomized trials or cohort clinical studies).
Option — therapeutic or diagnostic measures that may be useful (efficacy confirmed by expert opinion in specific clinical cases). Not recommended — therapeutic and diagnostic measures that have no positive effect or may cause harm (any level of evidence).
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is damage to the skull and intracranial contents, including brain tissue, cerebral vessels, cranial nerves, and meninges, caused by mechanical energy. The diagnosis is established when there is a clear history of head trauma (history of trauma).
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
The modern concept of brain injury in TBI is based on the concept of primary and secondary injury factors. The traumatic factor causes primary (irreversible) damage within milliseconds, which triggers a cascade of secondary destructive biochemical and immunological reactions. Secondary brain injury factors are subdivided into intracranial (brain edema, intracranial hematomas and hemorrhages, intracranial infection, etc.) and extracranial (hypoxia, arterial hypotension, hypo-, hypercapnia, hypo-, hyperglycemia, hyperthermia, arterial hypertension, infection, etc.)
Secondary injuries combined with primary structural damage to the brain tissue significantly aggravate the severity of the patients' condition and can cause an unfavorable outcome. Secondary brain injury is viewed as a potentially reversible process with timely intervention.
The main pathogenetic links of TBI develop independently of the patient's age. At the same time, the younger the child, the more pronounced are the anatomical and physiological differences that determine the specific features of the brain's reaction to trauma — these include high metabolic rate; low tolerance to blood loss; low tolerance to hypoxia and hypotension; predisposition to brain edema and swelling; low tolerance to hyperthermia; predominance of generalized, diffuse cerebral reactions over focal local manifestations; high compensatory capabilities with sudden and rapid functional decompensation.
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) in children occurs more frequently than in adults. Mortality among children with severe TBI ranges across different regions from 12 to 30% or more [2,9]. The results of a survey conducted at the Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology in 2008 across various federal districts showed that the incidence of TBI among the pediatric population is highly variable, which may largely be due to the lack of a unified reporting and registration system. At the same time, statistical analysis showed that among hospitalized children with neurotrauma, the proportion of severe traumatic brain injury is 6%, which amounts to about 4,000 disabled individuals annually [2].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
S06.0 Concussion
S06.1 Traumatic cerebral edema
S06.2 Diffuse brain injury
S06.3 Focal brain injury
S06.4 Epidural hemorrhage
S06.5 Traumatic subdural hemorrhage
S06.6 Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage
S06.7 Intracranial injury with prolonged coma
S06.8 Other intracranial injuries
S06.9 Intracranial injury, unspecified.
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
The classification of TBI is based on its biomechanics, type, nature, form, severity of injuries, clinical phase, period of course, as well as the outcome of the trauma [Potapov A.A. et al., 2003; Konovalov A.N. et al., 1998 – 2002].
Mild TBI (mTBI) is an acutely developed impairment of brain function resulting from traumatic impact, which may be accompanied by transient loss of consciousness (up to 30 minutes) and/or amnesia (up to 24 hours). It includes a single nosology — cerebral concussion.
Cerebral concussion (concussion) is the mildest clinical form of diffuse transient brain injury based on metabolic, ionic, neurotransmitter disturbances and neuroinflammation, characterized by the absence of visible changes on computed tomography (CT), and clinically presenting as a single functionally reversible form [3].
Moderate TBI includes mild and moderate brain contusions, epidural-subperiosteal hematomas without brain compression.
Severe traumatic brain injury includes
severe brain contusion,
intracranial hematomas with compression (acute epidural, subdural, intracerebral hematoma),
diffuse axonal injury [1,3,7].
To assess the severity of traumatic brain injury globally, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (Appendix G1), developed in 1974 by G. Teasdale and B. Jennett, is widely used. The significance of the GCS lies in its ability to provide an objective assessment of brain injury severity using a quantitative scale. For pediatric patients, taking into account age-related features, a pediatric scale has been developed (Appendix G2).
Mild TBI: 13–15 GCS points (corresponds to concussion and mild brain contusion).
Moderate TBI: 9–12 GCS points (corresponds to moderate brain contusion).
Severe traumatic brain injury: 3–8 GCS points (corresponds to severe brain contusion).
Both classifications are well compatible [3].
According to biomechanics, TBI is classified into: 1) impact-counterimpact, 2) acceleration-deceleration, 3) combined.
By type of injury: 1) focal, 2) diffuse, 3) combined.
By the genesis of brain injury in TBI, a distinction is made between: 1) primary injuries, which result from the direct impact of traumatic factors — focal contusions and lacerations of the brain, diffuse axonal injuries, primary intracranial hematomas, and combinations thereof;
a) secondary intracranial injuries resulting from factors such as impaired blood-brain barrier permeability, increased brain volume or swelling due to edema, hyperemia or venous engorgement, elevated intracranial pressure, brain displacement and deformation, delayed hematomas (epi-subdural, intracerebral), impaired hemato- and CSF circulation due to subarachnoid or intraventricular hemorrhage, intracranial infection, etc. b) secondary extracranial factors: arterial hypotension, hypoxemia, hypercapnia, anemia, etc. [Reilly P., Bullock R., 2005]. Secondary factors can be prevented or treated, which depends on timely and correct diagnosis, organization, and quality of neurosurgical care.
The following clinical forms of TBI are distinguished: 1) concussion, 2) mild brain contusion, 3) moderate brain contusion, 4) severe brain contusion, 5) diffuse axonal injury, 6) brain compression, 7) head compression.
In TBI, three basic periods of traumatic brain disease are distinguished [Likhterman L.B. et al., 2012]: 1) acute, 2) intermediate, 3) remote.
Acute period is the time interval from the moment of mechanical energy impact on the brain with a sudden disorder of its integrative-regulatory and local functions until the stabilization of impaired general cerebral and systemic functions at a certain level, or the death of the victim. The duration of the acute period ranges from 2 to 10 weeks depending on the clinical form of TBI. Approximate durations of the acute TBI period are: for concussion — up to 2 weeks, mild brain contusion — up to 3 weeks, moderate brain contusion — up to 4–5 weeks, severe brain contusion — up to 6–8 weeks, diffuse axonal injury — up to 8–10 weeks, brain compression — from 3 to 10 weeks (depending on the baseline condition).
Intermediate period is the time interval from the stabilization of systemic, general cerebral, and focal functions impaired by the trauma until their complete or partial recovery or stable compensation. Duration of the intermediate period: in mild TBI — up to 2 months, in moderate TBI — up to 4 months, in severe TBI — up to 6 months.
Remote period is the period of clinical recovery, or maximally achievable rehabilitation of impaired functions, or the emergence and/or progression of new pathological conditions caused by the sustained TBI. Duration of the remote period: in clinical recovery — up to 2 years, in progressive course — unlimited [Likhterman L.B. et al., 2012].
It is recommended to determine the nature of the injury during the initial assessment. Based on soft tissue damage, closed severe TBI (with soft tissue damage up to the aponeurosis) and open TBI (with soft tissue damage deeper than the aponeurosis) are distinguished.
Based on dura mater (DM) damage, penetrating (DM damaged) and non-penetrating (DM intact) severe TBI are distinguished.
Types of TBI include: isolated (if there are no extracranial injuries), combined (if mechanical energy simultaneously causes extracranial injuries), and complex/combined (if different types of energy — mechanical and thermal, or radiation, or chemical — act simultaneously) injuries [1, 3].
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
Head examination may reveal signs indicating a past injury (bruises, abrasions, wounds) and skull base fractures (bruising in the mastoid process area [Battle's sign], periorbital hematomas ["raccoon eyes"], leakage of fluid from the external auditory canals, nose, mouth), facial emphysema, mobility of the facial skeleton bones, exophthalmos, and soft tissue hematomas.
Following the general examination, the patient's neurological status is assessed, including: 1) assessment of the level of consciousness using the Glasgow Coma Scale (Appendices G1, G2), 2) pupil state (diameter, symmetry, light reflexes), 3) motor response to painful stimulation (pain localization, flexion response, extension response, lack of motor response), 4) cranial nerve functions, 5) reflex status, 6) meningeal syndrome, 7) oculomotor disorders. All patients with TBI require repeated dynamic neurological examinations.
During the neurological examination, it must be taken into account that acute epidural hematoma in 10% of cases, and acute subdural hematoma in 5% of cases, may feature a triphasic course — initial loss of consciousness, followed by a lucid interval and secondary deterioration with a drop in the level of consciousness to stupor or coma (Konovalov A.N., 2001; Krylov V.V. et al., 2019). It should be kept in mind that in addition to the classic "lucid" interval after initial loss of consciousness, there may be a reduced "lucid" interval or its absence.
Acute subdural hematoma can be either isolated or combined with brain contusion foci. Severe brain contusion is characterized by loss of consciousness lasting from several hours to several days, a decrease in wakefulness to stupor or coma, and may be accompanied by psychomotor agitation, brainstem signs, hormotonia, meningeal signs, epileptic seizures, and vital function disorders. The onset of bradycardia in TBI is due to reflex irritation of the vagus nerve nuclei caused by intracranial hypertension and dislocation. Anisocoria most commonly develops on the side of the hematoma during the initial phase of tentorial herniation, more frequently in acute subdural hematomas, though not in all cases (up to 30% according to the Sklifosovsky Research Institute of Emergency Medicine, 2019). When anisocoria was present, in 82% of cases it was noted on the side of the hematoma, and in 18% on the contralateral side (Krylov V.V. et al., 2019).
The clinical picture of acute epidural hematoma depends on its rate of development and localization; with rapid development of the herniation syndrome, patients may be admitted to the hospital in a severe condition, with the frequency of stupor and coma reaching up to 60% (Konovalov A.N. et al., 2001; Krylov V.V. et al., 2019). Frequently, with this type of hematoma, there is an absence of a lucid interval in up to 40% of cases.
As the herniation syndrome progresses, general cerebral, hypertensive, and meningeal symptoms, drowsiness, psychomotor agitation, bradycardia, and subsequent decrease in the level of wakefulness develop. In 7% of patients, seizures may occur (Krylov V.V. et al., 2019). A feature of the clinical course of epidural hematomas is the possibility of their delayed progression over time; therefore, all victims with severe TBI who experience clinical deterioration or who are found to have a small-volume acute epidural hematoma require a repeat brain spiral computed tomography (SCT). Up to 90% of patients with acute epidural hematoma have a skull fracture. Unlike epidural hematomas, subdural hematomas are not limited in their spread and can be located over 2 or more lobes of the brain; meanwhile, skull fractures in acute subdural hematomas are less common than in acute epidural hematomas — up to 45% (Krylov V.V. et al., 2019).
Unlike acute epidural hematomas, herniation syndrome develops more slowly in acute subdural hematomas, with general cerebral symptoms and mental disorders prevailing in the clinical picture, and epileptic seizures occurring somewhat more frequently (up to 12%). A triphasic course in acute subdural hematomas is rare, whereas anisocoria (up to 56%) and bradycardia (50%) are more pronounced, and up to 28% of patients have contralateral pyramidal deficit. The severity of the patient's condition with acute subdural hematoma is determined by its volume; thus, with a hematoma volume of up to 50 cm³, patients do not exhibit severe impairment in the level of wakefulness.
Diffuse axonal injury of the brain is characterized by a prolonged (up to 2–3 weeks) comatose state, pronounced brainstem symptoms (upward gaze paresis, vertical ocular divergence, bilateral depression or loss of pupillary light reflex, impaired or absent oculocephalic reflex, etc.). Disturbances in respiratory rate and rhythm and hemodynamic instability are frequently observed. A characteristic feature of the clinical course of diffuse axonal injury is the transition from prolonged coma into a persistent or transient vegetative state, indicated by the onset of previously absent eye opening, either spontaneously or in response to various stimuli. At the same time, there are no signs of tracking, gaze fixation, or execution of even elementary instructions (this condition is referred to as apallic syndrome).
The vegetative state in such patients lasts from several days to several months and is characterized by functional and/or anatomical dissociation of the cerebral hemispheres and the brainstem. As the patient emerges from the vegetative state, neurological symptoms of dissociation are predominantly replaced by deficit symptoms. These are dominated by extrapyramidal syndrome with pronounced muscle rigidity, dyscoordination, bradykinesia, oligophasia, hypomimia, minor hyperkinesia, and ataxia. Simultaneously, aspontaneity (indifference to the surroundings, untidiness in bed, lack of any drives for activity), amnestic confusion, and dementia manifest. At the same time, gross affective disorders in the form of irritability and aggressiveness are observed.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
Criteria for establishing the disease or condition:
anamnestic data: presence of a history of trauma according to the victim's description or eyewitness accounts.
physical examination: clinical presentation of traumatic brain injury (impaired consciousness, focal, meningeal symptoms, herniation syndrome), presence of wounds and abrasions, signs of cranial bone fractures, presence of bleeding, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and brain tissue discharge through the wound.
instrumental examination: brain CT, skull radiography
It is recommended to use the Glasgow Coma Scale, taking into account age-related features, when assessing the neurological status at all stages of specialized care to determine the severity of the injured child's condition (Appendices G1, G2) [35].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
It is recommended that all patients with impaired consciousness additionally use the FOUR score (Appendix G8) and the Pittsburgh Brainstem Score (Appendix G9) to clarify the neurological status and severity of injury [117].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
It is recommended that all patients with impaired consciousness start monitoring blood pressure on peripheral arteries, heart rate, and respiratory rate as early as possible to monitor the patient's condition [35, 106].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Comments:
Assessment of the patient's general condition includes assessment of the level of arousal (GCS), airway status and breathing pattern (free, labored, superficial, pathological, rhythmic, presence or absence of pneumo-hemothorax), assessment of the cardiovascular system (character of the pulse on the carotid and radial arteries [if the pulse is absent on the radial and present on the carotid, systolic pressure is within 50–70 mmHg], heart sounds, HR, BP), and assessment of the level of arousal.
At the prehospital stage, especially in patients in a comatose state, it is important to assess the state of brainstem functions, within the structure of which the state of the pupils is of fundamental importance (pathology: pupil asymmetry [anisocoria], fixed bilateral pupil dilation [mydriasis], absence of reaction to bright light).
Depression of the level of arousal below 9 points on the GCS, symmetric or asymmetric increase in pupil diameter (anisocoria) with impaired light reaction, symmetric or asymmetric increase in muscle tone up to decerebrate rigidity, blood pressure instability, and bradycardia indicate a severe and extremely severe condition of the patient and the development of herniation syndrome.
Monitoring of vital functions is continued in the ambulance. Along with the assessment of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems, special attention is paid to the dynamics of consciousness disorders, the state of the pupils, and the presence and progression of motor disorders (paresis and paralysis) and muscle tone to detect a potential increase in herniation syndrome
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
When taking the anamnesis, it is recommended to determine the mechanism, location, and time of the injury to clarify the nature and severity of the damage. When taking the history, it is important to take into account the features of the child's psychomotor development. Due to the fact that a patient with severe TBI is in a comatose state, it is necessary to ascertain the anamnesis and circumstances of the injury from relatives or accompanying persons whenever possible [36].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
2.2 Physical Examination
It is recommended that children who have sustained a head injury or are suspected of having a brain injury be examined by a neurosurgeon (or emergency care specialist) to provide urgent specialized care [1, 9, 10].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to consult injured children in a specialized hospital setting to rule out intracranial hematomas and other life-threatening injuries [1, 9, 10].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
A thorough general examination of a patient with severe TBI is strongly recommended, including external inspection, palpation of the spine, chest and ribs, abdomen, and facial skeleton to rule out associated injuries. It is mandatory to search for extracranial injuries, as any TBI may be associated [37–39].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Comments:
During the initial assessment of a patient with severe TBI, it is necessary to establish its nature (closed/open; penetrating/non-penetrating; isolated/associated/combined) and the substrate of injury (DAI/contusion foci/meningeal hematomas; bone structure damage; presence or absence of subarachnoid hemorrhage; and to describe in detail the damage to soft tissues and extracranial structures [thoracic/abdominal cavity; cervical spine; skeletal trauma, pelvis]).
It is recommended to use the ISS (Injury Severity Score) (Appendix G10) to assess the severity of associated injuries in patients with severe polytrauma involving traumatic brain injury [107].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
When assessing neurological status, the effect of pharmacological sedation is taken into account. Special attention is paid to patients (children, adolescents) in a state of alcohol intoxication, who may exhibit focal neurological symptoms in mild TBI. A separate assessment of focal, general cerebral, meningeal, and brainstem lesion symptoms is performed.
When assessing brainstem reflexes in unconscious patients, the following algorithm is applied:
1) assessment of response to pain stimulus (opens/does not open eyes, localizes/does not localize pain/flexion/extension response/no response);
2) assessment of light reaction, presence of anisocoria, pupil sizes,
3) assessment of corneal reflexes,
4) assessment of oculocephalic and oculovestibular reflexes (contraindicated in cervical spine trauma),
5) assessment of the cough reflex (during tracheal suction)
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
All patients with severe TBI upon admission are recommended to undergo:
1) general (clinical) blood count with platelet count to identify the condition [40]:
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
2) general biochemical blood test, coagulogram (exploratory assessment of the hemostatic system), general (clinical) urinalysis to assess the state of internal organs (liver, kidneys, pancreas, gallbladder, etc.), identify/exclude an active inflammatory process, as well as water-electrolyte balance disorders [141, 142];
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
3) coagulogram (exploratory assessment of the hemostatic system) to identify the condition [41, 42];
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
4) study of acid-base balance and blood gases to identify the condition [43].
GPP BLOE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 3)
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
It is recommended to perform brain computed tomography (A06.23.004 medical services nomenclature) in patients with moderate (GCS 12–9 points) and severe TBI (GCS 8–3 points) as the first-line diagnostic method for traumatic brain injuries in emergency specialized care settings, which allows for an objective and rapid assessment of the intracranial situation. Indications for CT in head trauma with a level of arousal of 15–13 GCS points (mild traumatic brain injury) are based on the presence of risk factors for intracranial injuries [14, 44, 143].
GPP BLOE 2Level of Evidence B (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 2)
Comments:
High risk factors for intracranial injuries
GCS score less than 15
decrease in GCS by 2 points during clinical monitoring
amnesia lasting more than 30 minutes
focal neurological symptoms
diagnosed or suspected skull fracture
presence of a large scalp hematoma (in children under 2 years of age)
suspected open traumatic brain injury (profuse hemorrhage/suspected cerebrospinal fluid leak from the nasopharynx or ears, "raccoon eyes" sign, ecchymosis over the mastoid process)
post-traumatic seizures
loss of consciousness following trauma
repeated vomiting in the absence of other causes
intense post-traumatic headache, general agitation, behavioral changes
head trauma in patients with coagulopathy
history of neurosurgical pathology
intoxication with alcohol or other CNS depressants
fall from a height
age under 2 years
high-energy mechanism of injury
CT data allow for the quantification of the extent of injuries and can be considered as outcome predictors.
Adverse outcomes correlate with the progression of diffuse brain injury from grade I to IV according to the Marshall CT classification (Appendix G4), the presence of blood in the basal cisterns, and the presence of intracranial hematomas and brain contusions causing a mass effect. Compression or effacement of the basal cisterns on CT is a high risk factor for intracranial hypertension [3,7,10,11,18].
In cases of suspected craniovertebral trauma or cervical spine fracture (according to the Canadian C-spine high-risk criteria), spiral computed tomography of the cervical spine with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement is recommended for pediatric patients;
Recommended radiography of the cervical spine in 2 projections when computed tomography of the neck with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement and computed tomography of the spine (one segment) are not feasible [45].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Canadian C-spine high-risk criteria:
1) Fall from a height of more than 1 m
2) Axial load to the head (diving)
3) Motor vehicle collision at high speed, rollover motor vehicle crash, or bicycle/motorized vehicle (scooter) accident
4) Presence of extremity paresthesias
5) Additional: unconscious patients with an unknown history.
Recommended to refer the injured child for a brain CT scan to rule out intracranial injuries in the presence of fractures and suspected skull vault fractures on craniograms [46]
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Recommended radiography of the entire skull in 2 projections for all injured patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15–14 with suspected TBI, suspected skull base and vault fracture, and unclear trauma history [9,14, 46]
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Computed tomography brain monitoring (repeat scan) is recommended for pediatric patients with worsening neurological deficits, escalating intracranial hypertension/refractory intracranial hypertension, or when neurological status cannot be assessed due to prolonged sedation or neuromuscular blockade [47, 108, 109].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
All patients with severe TBI (GCS 3–8) upon admission are recommended to undergo an electrocardiogram to assess cardiac function [48].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
All patients with severe TBI upon admission are recommended to undergo spiral computed tomography or radiography of the chest to rule out polytrauma [144].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
All patients with severe TBI upon admission are recommended to undergo abdominal CT or comprehensive abdominal ultrasound to rule out polytrauma [49, 51, 115].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
It is recommended to perform cerebral laser spectrophotometry (BICS, infrared brain scanning) (A12.30.006 according to the nomenclature of medical services) as an auxiliary hardware-based examination method in addition to a neurological examination for all patients with a GCS score of 15–14 and suspected TBI, during primary health care, specialized medical care, and emergency medical care, in order to rule out intracranial hemorrhages (hematomas) [16, 27, 29].
GPP BLOE 2Level of Evidence B (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 2)
Comments:
If necessary, BICS (infrared brain scanning) is performed dynamically every 20 minutes.
Mild TBI accounts for 90% of all head injuries. Only 25% of patients undergo a CT scan, while 75% of pediatric patients receive no instrumental examination. Visual diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhage in mild TBI (GCS 14–15) in children is difficult and sometimes impossible due to the atypical clinical presentation and absence of symptoms typical for children. Delayed diagnosis of cerebral hemorrhage generally leads to complications, prolonged treatment, extended rehabilitation, and mortality.
If CT/MRI is unavailable, neurosonography is recommended for infants (first year of life) to rule out life-threatening intracranial injuries and for clinical and sonographic monitoring [1, 52].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Brain MRI is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) as a subsequent option to determine the extent and nature of injury in cases of diffuse axonal injury and brain contusions, provided the imaging modality is available [53, 54].
GPP BLOE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 3)
Comments:
An indication for MRI in children may be the very fact of TBI accompanied by the onset of focal neurological symptoms.
MRI findings can be used to predict TBI outcomes in children.
The scope of the examination is determined by the severity of the child's condition. The MRI technique represents a compromise between achieving the highest possible image quality, completeness, and reliability of information regarding the region of interest, on the one hand, and minimizing total scan time, on the other. This is due to the low tolerance of patients experiencing pain or traumatic shock, the need for multiplanar imaging necessitated by the complex configuration of the pathological process, and the requirement for multiparametric characterization of traumatic lesions. The duration of the scanning protocol can be reduced to 5–10 minutes by increasing acceleration factor values, altering relaxation times, voxel or matrix dimensions, or decreasing signal-to-noise ratio values.
Basic brain MRI protocol for TBI (Appendices G5, G6):
rapid scout sequences to obtain brain slices in the sagittal, axial, and coronal planes;
axial T2-weighted TSE, slice thickness 3–4 mm, up to 31 slices;
axial T2-weighted FLAIR, slice thickness 3–4 mm, up to 31 slices;
T2*-weighted GE = SWI (typically 3D in the primary axial plane);
sagittal T2-weighted FLAIR, slice thickness 3–4 mm, 27 slices;
coronal T1-weighted FLAIR or T1-weighted GE, slice thickness 3 mm;
3D DWI in the primary axial plane.
When analyzing MRI data in TBI patients, alongside visual assessment of the brain tissue via signal intensity changes, a series of measurements is performed to quantify mass effect. The following parameters are measured: midline shift, volumes of contusions and hematomas, ventricular volumes, degree of cisternal compression, and linear dimensions.
Midline shift is measured at the level of the septum pellucidum. Areas are calculated by tracing the contours of the region of interest. Volume is determined using the ellipsoid volume formula:
V=1/6∙π∙A∙B∙C
where V is the volume of the contusion or hematoma, and A, B, C are its principal diameters.
When analyzing cerebrospinal fluid spaces, special attention must be paid to visualizing the cisterns: ambient, basal, lateral, transverse, quadrigeminal, pontine, vein of Galen cistern, and cerebellar vermis cistern.
To assess the degree of ambient cistern deformation, its configuration, relationship to adjacent brain structures, width, and the angle formed by the intersection of its lateral angle planes (normally varying from 90° to 105°) are evaluated.
2.5 Other Procedures
General (clinical) cerebrospinal fluid analysis is recommended for children (0–18 years) when developing intracranial purulent-inflammatory complications are suspected. Lumbar puncture is recommended in the absence of clinical and CT signs of herniation syndrome and preserved patency of CSF pathways to prevent the development or worsening of brain herniation and dislocation processes [145, 146].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
Delayed care, secondary brain injury, incomplete examination, unskilled surgical intervention, and inadequate intensive care are the primary causes of patient mortality and disability.
3.1. Conservative management
3.1.1. Prehospital stage
The prehospital stage, or the stage of first medical aid for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), is one of the most critical and vulnerable phases. The effectiveness of the provided care depends on the time factor and the optimal scope of care, which is why we considered it necessary to include this section in these guidelines.
The main tasks of the prehospital stage in children with TBI include assessing the severity of the injury and general condition, determining and providing the priority needs of the injured child, and ensuring the fastest possible transport to a specialized hospital with appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities [5, 9, 18, 19].
For pediatric patients with severe TBI (GCS 3–8 points), restoring and maintaining vital functions and preventing secondary brain injury are of paramount importance. When necessary, resuscitation measures should be initiated as close to the injury site as possible [1–3, 5, 10, 17, 18].
Emergency medical service specialists should have a clear understanding of the main pathogenetic links in the development of «traumatic disease» of the brain.
Documentation completed at the prehospital stage should reflect the provisional diagnosis, hemodynamic status, dynamics during observation, and the scope of emergency care provided at the scene and during transport [5, 10].
3.1.1.1. Initial patient examination
It is recommended to transfer the patient to a stretcher and an ambulance with stable fixation of the cervical spine. Contraindications to transfer to the ambulance include cardiac and respiratory arrest, and life-threatening external bleeding [5, 7, 9, 11, 19, 55, 56].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Foreign bodies and bone fragments from the cranial cavity in penetrating wounds must not be removed.
To transport the patient, it is recommended to use a vacuum mattress that allows immobilization of the entire musculoskeletal system. If a vacuum mattress is unavailable, a cervical collar and splints to immobilize injured limbs (in case of polytrauma) should be applied [56, 57].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to perform preliminary analgesia in patients with polytrauma prior to transfer to the intensive care ambulance. Opioid analgesics are administered (for injuries accompanied by severe pain—fentanyl** 0.005% solution (ATX code N01AH) at an age-appropriate dosage (1–2 mcg/kg); contraindicated under 1 year of age) [9, 11, 18, 58, 150].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
3.1.1.2. Restoration of oxygenation at the prehospital stage
Patency of the airway is secured. If necessary, the oro/nasopharynx is suctioned and an airway is inserted. In the presence of signs of respiratory failure during spontaneous breathing, oxygen mask ventilation is provided. Adequacy is assessed based on clinical data and monitoring parameters.
It is recommended that prehospital endotracheal intubation in patients with impaired consciousness down to coma grade I (GCS score less than 9) be performed exclusively by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist or a trained emergency physician [3, 7, 9, 11, 18, 20, 59].
GPP BLOE 2Level of Evidence B (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 2)
Comments:
Avoid episodes of hypoxia.
It is recommended in children to perform endotracheal intubation after administering atropine** (ATX code A03BA01 (belladonna alkaloids, tertiary amines)) 0.01% solution at a dose of 0.1 ml/year of the child's life, with preliminary treatment of the oropharyngeal mucosa and the endotracheal tube with a local anesthetic solution (10% lidocaine** solution (ATX code D04AB (local anesthetics)) (as a spray) under conditions of fixed cervical spine. It is advisable to use hypnotics and sedatives N05C (ATX code N05C)—midazolam** (benzodiazepine derivatives) and muscle relaxants (ATX code M03AC (peripheral muscle relaxants)) [110, 111, 118, 119].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
If intubation is impossible in pediatric patients (0–18 years) with impaired consciousness down to coma grade I (GCS score less than 9), conicotomy (A16.08.022) is recommended [60].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to perform pleural puncture in children in the presence of tension pneumo-hemothorax [11].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for the entire pediatric population (0–18 years) with impaired consciousness down to coma grade I (GCS score less than 9) to receive mechanical ventilation with a respiratory rate of 20 breaths/min for children older than 1 year and 30 breaths/min for children under 1 year of age. The adequacy of mechanical ventilation is assessed by clinical data and monitoring parameters [11].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
3.1.1.3. Correction of arterial hypotension at the prehospital stage
In children, hypotension is defined as systolic blood pressure below the 5th percentile of the age norm (Appendix 3). The lower limit of systolic blood pressure (5th percentile) of the age norm can be calculated by the formula: 70 mmHg + (2 × age in years) (2).
It is recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) to diagnose and correct hypotension as quickly as possible by restoring circulating blood volume [3, 7, 9, 11, 14, 18, 20, 61, 62].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
It is recommended to use sympathomimetics (ATX code R01BA) in cases of decreased blood pressure in children with severe TBI under normovolemic conditions [11, 120].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) in the presence of hypotension to evaluate for extracranial injuries (rule out shock-inducing trauma) [63].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
It is recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) with severe TBI to establish venous access as early as possible. If peripheral veins are inaccessible, intraosseous vascular access is used [11].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Bradyarrhythmia and cardiac arrest are indications for initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation. It is recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) to use closed-chest cardiac massage for artificial circulation support. The primary drug used in cardiac resuscitation is epinephrine** (ATX code C01CA24). If vascular access is unavailable, endotracheal administration of drugs or a single administration into the root of the tongue is possible [11].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
3.1.1.4. Drug therapy
It is recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) to use solutions affecting the water-electrolyte balance to restore and maintain water-electrolyte balance (ATX code B05BB), sodium chloride** (B05XA) at a dose of no more than 15 ml/kg. Administration rate—60–120 drops per minute under blood pressure and heart rate monitoring [11, 18].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) to restore hemodynamics in the event of developing or worsening hemodynamic instability with a drop in blood pressure during ongoing infusion therapy by concurrently administering adrenergic and dopaminergic agents (dopamine** (ATX code C01CA04) 4% 3–5 mcg/kg/min, increasing the dose up to 10 mcg/kg/min or more if necessary; and in case of ineffectiveness—in combination with epinephrine** (ATX code C01CA24) in an age-appropriate dose) [9, 11, 120].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) to use glucocorticoids—prednisolone** (ATX code H02AB (Glucocorticoids)).
The purpose of administration is an anti-shock effect due to its stimulating influence on myocardial contractility and its ability to increase blood pressure [11, 116].
GPP BLOE 2Level of Evidence B (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 2)
3.1.1.5. Transport conditions
It is recommended for the timely detection of vital function disorders to perform instrumental monitoring of vital functions including mechanical ventilation under the control of pulse oximetry and capnometry for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) [11, 31].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Infusion therapy aimed at maintaining systolic blood pressure at the upper limits of the age norm.
It is recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years), with the aim of preventing secondary brain injury, to provide sedation and muscle relaxation using benzodiazepine derivatives (ATX codes N05BA and N05CD, respectively): diazepam** (N05BA01), midazolam** (N05CD08) in accordance with the instructions [18].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) to elevate the head end of the stretcher by 30° (in the absence of arterial hypotension) to ensure adequate venous outflow from the cranial cavity [17, 18].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) to maintain normoventilation as the optimal option (etCO2 = 37–39 mmHg) in the absence of hypotension or hypoxemia. Moderate hyperventilation (etCO2 = 32–36 mmHg) is permissible only in the absence of clinical signs of herniation syndrome [11, 18, 19, 31].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is not recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) to use mannitol** (ATX code B05BC (solutions with osmodiuretic action)) for the prevention of brain edema and herniation [18, 20, 121].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) to administer #mannitol** (B05BC01) in the presence of clinical signs of developing herniation syndrome at a dose of 0.25 g/kg of the patient's body weight [3, 7, 9, 11, 18, 20, 112, 121].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is not recommended for the pediatric category of patients (0–18 years) to perform mechanical ventilation in a hyperventilation mode (CO2 < 30 mmHg) [3, 7, 9, 11, 14, 18, 20, 23].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
3.1.2. Specialized inpatient facility
Optimal timing implies admission of the patient within the first hour after trauma with notification of the receiving medical facility.
Treatment of children with severe isolated and polytrauma TBI is carried out in a specialized hospital. A specialized hospital is a multidisciplinary pediatric hospital with round-the-clock CT, laboratory-diagnostic, intensive care, surgical, traumatological, and neurosurgical services [1, 9, 10].
Transportation/transfer to a specialized hospital is carried out in the following cases [9-11, 14, 18]:
GCS <14 points,
Open TBI
Fall from a height of more than 2 meters
High-energy trauma mechanism
Prolonged extrication of the victim (more than 20 minutes) from rubble, vehicles, etc.
Age under 5 years
It is recommended that children who have sustained a head injury or are suspected of having a brain injury be examined by a neurosurgeon (or an emergency care specialist). The consultation is conducted in a specialized hospital setting to rule out intracranial hematomas and other life-threatening injuries [1, 9, 10].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that mandatory hospitalization of the injured child be performed in the following cases [11]:
loss of consciousness or doubt thereof;
persistent alteration of consciousness;
presence of focal neurological symptoms;
post-traumatic seizures;
suspected linear or depressed skull fracture;
suspected skull base fracture and cerebrospinal fluid leak (CSF leak).
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to hospitalize and observe a patient diagnosed with mild traumatic brain injury (cerebral concussion) for at least 24 hours (until complete regression of general cerebral symptoms). The purpose of hospitalization and examination is to rule out a more severe injury [10]. Mortality in mTBI is low (0.04-0.29%) and is caused by intracranial hematomas [12].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to provide syndromic therapy for pediatric patients (0-18 years old) with mild traumatic brain injury. In most cases, non-narcotic analgesics (for headache relief), hypnotics, and sedatives (N05C) (to reduce anxiety and excitability and for sleep disorders) are prescribed [11].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that children after mild traumatic brain injury be monitored by a pediatric neurologist for 3 months. The need for rehabilitation arises only in the case of a complicated course of trauma, or in the presence of comorbid pathology that exacerbates the manifestations of organic brain damage [76].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that children with severe traumatic brain injury be treated in pediatric specialized multidisciplinary hospitals, or in their absence, in an adult multidisciplinary hospital that has the necessary equipment and medical personnel trained to provide emergency specialized care to children (pediatric service). [10-11, 18]
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to hospitalize injured children with vital function disorders, hemodynamic instability, seizures, chest injuries, open limb fractures, unstable pelvic fractures, and a GCS level of consciousness <13 through the shock trauma room to continue/initiate resuscitation measures and simultaneously perform the most rapid possible diagnosis of injuries. [9-11, 15, 17, 19]
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
The main purpose of hospitalization is the fastest possible diagnosis of injuries and elimination of the main life-threatening pathophysiological mechanism.
The overall severity of the patient's condition and brain injury is assessed with the involvement of all necessary specialists (anesthesiologist-resuscitologist, traumatologist, surgeon, etc.) united by a unified treatment and diagnostic program that implies the continuity and consistency of the therapeutic process.
Neurological status is monitored to control brainstem functions—the level of consciousness (Glasgow Coma Scale) is reassessed, and pupil status is evaluated (pathology: pupillary asymmetry of one millimeter or more (anisocoria), fixed bilateral pupillary dilation (mydriasis), absence of reaction to bright light).
3.1.2.1. Monitoring of vital functions
It is recommended to monitor vital functions in patients with severe TBI (GCS less than 9 points). The purpose of monitoring: control of vital functions, maintenance of the physiological corridor, prevention of secondary brain injury [3, 5, 9-11, 17-20].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to perform neuromonitoring for pediatric TBI victims (0-18 years old), including clinical monitoring (dynamic control of the level of consciousness according to GCS and control of pupillary responses), hemodynamic control (preference is given to invasive blood pressure measurement), respiration, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, laboratory and CT monitoring [113].
GPP BLOE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 3)
Monitoring of ICP is recommended for children with severe TBI (GCS 3-8 points) [11, 17-19, 23].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to expand this diagnostic complex for pediatric TBI victims (0-18 years old) with cerebral vessel ultrasound, central venous pressure monitoring, arterial and venous blood acid-base status determination, and tissue microdialysis [3].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
3.1.2.1 Respiratory monitoring
Tracheal intubation with possible subsequent mechanical ventilation is recommended for victims with impaired consciousness down to coma grade I (less than 8 points on the GCS) [3, 7, 9, 11, 18, 20].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to avoid hyperventilation and associated hypocapnia (PaCO2 <30 mmHg) during mechanical ventilation in pediatric TBI victims (0-18 years old) [3, 7, 9, 11, 18, 20].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that pediatric TBI victims (0-18 years old) maintain brain tissue oxygenation (PbrO2) levels above 10 mmHg when monitoring is used [3, 7, 9, 11, 18, 20].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
In children with TBI ≤8 (on the GCS), airway status must be controlled to prevent hypoxemia, hypercapnia, and aspiration. Oxygenation and ventilation must be assessed continuously using pulse oximetry and CO2 monitoring (capnography with determination of end-tidal CO2 concentration), and/or by dynamic blood gas analysis and blood acid-base status testing [14, 15, 17-19].
Upon loss of consciousness to the level of coma (less than 8 points on the GCS), the patient must be intubated, and if spontaneous breathing is ineffective through the endotracheal tube, mechanical ventilation (MV) should be performed. To prevent episodes of patient-ventilator dyssynchrony during MV that cause a sharp increase in ICP, the selection of ventilation modes or the administration of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockers and sedatives is necessary. End-tidal CO2 or PaCO2 concentration must be maintained within 36-40 mmHg. To prevent cerebral hypoxia, all manipulations associated with the depressurization of the ventilator circuit must be accompanied by pre- and post-oxygenation with 100% oxygen.
Short-term hyperventilation can be used in case of a sharp deterioration in neurological status (threat of herniation syndrome development) and increasing intracranial hypertension when sedation, muscle relaxation, cerebrospinal fluid drainage from the cerebral ventricles, and osmotic diuretics are ineffective.
3.1.2.3. Hemodynamic monitoring
It is recommended to avoid episodes of blood pressure drops in pediatric TBI victims (0-18 years old) in order to prevent secondary strokes [3, 7, 9, 11, 17, 19, 20].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Arterial hypotension is corrected by restoring circulating blood volume. In children, hypotension is defined as systolic blood pressure below the fifth percentile of the age norm or in the presence of clinical signs of shock. The lower limit of systolic blood pressure (fifth percentile) of the age norm can be calculated using the formula: 70 mmHg + (2 × age in years). Vasopressor and inotropic support are used if necessary.
It is recommended in children with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) >40 mm Hg [9,15- 18,24]. A target CPP value between 40 and 50 mm Hg is suggested. Threshold values may depend on the age range (infants to adolescents)
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is the difference between mean arterial pressure and ICP—the pressure gradient that determines cerebral blood flow.
Cerebral perfusion pressure within 40-65 mmHg (depending on age) is optimal [11, 17, 19].
It is recommended that injured children with TBI (0–18 years) maintain systolic blood pressure above 90 mm Hg throughout the course of intensive therapy. Treatment of hypovolemia and arterial hypotension should be initiated with infusions of solutions affecting the water-electrolyte balance. Plasma osmolarity and sodium concentration must be monitored. Low values of osmolarity (<280 mOsm/l) and sodium (<135 mmol/l) should be corrected upward. Irrigation solutions (e.g., 5% dextrose solution**) are not used in the management of acute TBI. If infusion therapy is insufficiently effective for increasing CPP, adrenergic and dopaminergic agents should be used [11, 18]
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
3.1.2.4. ICP monitoring
It is recommended for all children with severe TBI (GCS ≤8) to maintain ICP <20 mm Hg [65]
LoR BGoE 2Level of recommendation validity B (Level of evidence reliability - 2)
ICP monitoring is recommended for children with sTBI (GCS ≤8). The use of intracranial pressure monitoring may also be considered in infants in the first year of life with sTBI [3, 7, 9, 11, 18, 20, 86, 87]
GPP BLOE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 3)
Comments:
Children with severe TBI (GCS ≤8) have a high risk of intracranial hypertension. Intracranial hypertension can accompany diffuse brain injury and post-traumatic sinus thrombosis. At higher GCS scores, ICP monitoring may be indicated for patients with severe polytrauma who require prolonged mechanical ventilation, sedation, and relaxation, i.e., those in conditions that limit the possibility of clinical monitoring.
Intracranial hypertension is a key pathophysiological variable in the development of secondary injuries (1–3). Since the late 1970s, a breakthrough in the treatment of severe TBI has been associated with the introduction of guidelines focused on intracranial pressure control (4). A meta-analysis of 15 studies including 857 children with sTBI showed the dependence of unfavorable outcomes on elevated ICP (>20 mm Hg) [15]. The appropriateness of using ICP monitoring is confirmed by data on the high incidence of ICP development in children with sTBI, the correlation of adverse outcomes with high intracranial pressure values, and improved treatment outcomes in patients with controlled ICP values. Although these studies correspond only to Class III evidence, their results demonstrate a relationship between the control of intracranial hypertension and neurological outcome. Several studies have shown the dependence of unfavorable outcomes after severe TBI on intracranial hypertension and/or systemic hypotension [17–19, 23].
ICP monitoring makes it possible to determine the optimal volume of treatment based on objective indicators, facilitating the adequate choice of methods such as hyperosmolar therapy, sedation, muscle relaxation, the use of barbiturates and their derivatives, and decompressive craniotomy.
3.1.2.5. Treatment of intracranial hypertension
It is recommended to correct ICP when the threshold of 20 mm Hg is exceeded in injured children with TBI (0–18 years) [3, 7, 9, 11, 18–20, 65]
LoR BGoE 2Level of recommendation validity B (Level of evidence reliability - 2)
Comments:
The treatment of severe TBI in children, just like in adults, is largely focused on controlling ICP and preserving CPP. A short-term increase in ICP with a return to normal values within <5 minutes is permissible, but a prolonged increase in ICP ≥20 mm Hg for ≥5 minutes requires treatment (1). Optimal threshold and target ICP values in pediatric TBI are still being refined and depend on age [17–19]. Publications on this issue are practically non-existent; only in one study did the ICP thresholds for initiating therapy vary depending on age and were 15, 18, and 20 mm Hg in children aged 0–24 months, 25–96 months, and 97–156 months, respectively [23].
Basic (prophylactic) and emergency therapy for intracranial hypertension are distinguished [10].
Basic (prophylactic) therapy is aimed at preventing and eliminating factors that can worsen or accelerate the development of intracranial hypertension. Specific factors that can lead to an increase in intracranial pressure include impaired venous outflow from the cranial cavity (incorrect head position of the patient, psychomotor agitation), respiratory disorders (airway obstruction, hypoxia, hypercapnia), hyperthermia, arterial hypo- and hypertension, and seizure syndrome.
3.1.2.6. Emergency therapy
It is recommended for injured children with TBI (0–18 years) with an increase in intracranial pressure above 20 mm Hg to eliminate all factors that can worsen or accelerate a further increase in intracranial pressure [11, 18].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that injured children with TBI (0–18 years) have the head of the bed elevated at an angle of 30° to 40°, gradually increasing the elevation angle. The head should be in a position that excludes compression of the jugular veins [11, 18, 90]
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
It is recommended for all children with severe TBI (GCS ≤8) to implement the following measures [66]:
– monitor hemodynamics and respiration, exclude airway obstruction;
– stop hyperthermia (strive to maintain normothermia);
– stop seizures (if present);
– monitor intra-abdominal (intra-abdominal hemorrhage, intestinal obstruction, etc.) and intrathoracic pressure (pneumo-, hemothorax);
– ensure deep sedation and relaxation.
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for injured children with TBI (0–18 years) with a persistent increase in intracranial pressure above 20 mm Hg to undergo repeat brain CT imaging to rule out intracranial injuries requiring emergency surgical intervention (epi-, subdural, intracerebral hematomas, obstructive hydrocephalus, development of dislocation syndrome) [17–19, 23, 66].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
3.1.2.6. Basic therapy for intracranial hypertension
Ventricular drainage
It is recommended whenever possible to install an external ventricular drain combined with an intracranial pressure sensor in injured children with TBI (0–18 years). This option provides the ability to measure ICP and drain cerebrospinal fluid if necessary. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage can be performed only under the control of intracranial pressure measurement [9, 15–17, 18].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Ventricular drainage is installed in patients with sTBI with a GCS level of consciousness <8 points if the manipulation can be performed (after neuroimaging). After opening the ventricular drain, release no more than 2 ml of CSF. ICP monitoring should be performed with a closed drain after 15–20 seconds. If there is no effect, perform repeated drainage. The drainage rate should not exceed 20 ml per hour.
Hyperosmolar solutions
(Solutions affecting water-electrolyte balance) (ATX code B05BB)
It is recommended for injured children with TBI (0–18 years) to avoid a persistent (>72 hours) increase in sodium levels above 170 mEq/ml to prevent secondary brain injury [11, 18]
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to use #mannitol** (ATX code B05BC01) in children with elevated ICP, although the evidence base is not presented [149].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Comments:
#Mannitol** is used as a bolus at a dose of 0.25–1.0 g/kg of body weight. The daily dose of administered #mannitol** should not exceed 140–180 g [11, 18, 149].
Mannitol** is widely used for elevated ICP in children with TBI and, despite the lack of an evidence base, has established itself as an effective and safe drug in the treatment of intracranial hypertension. It is advisable to use #mannitol** before starting ICP monitoring if there are signs of transtentorial herniation or neurological deterioration not related to the effects of extracranial factors [17, 18].
It is not recommended to administer #mannitol** (B05BC solutions with osmodiuretic action) in case of hypernatremia (Na >160 mmol/l) and hyperosmolarity (Osm >320 mOsm/l) in injured children with TBI (0–18 years) [11, 17, 18, 149]
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Use of barbiturates
It is recommended to administer therapeutic anesthesia with high doses of barbiturates in injured (children) with severe TBI with stable hemodynamics and the presence of refractory intracranial hypertension resistant to other methods of conservative treatment [16, 122].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Comments:
When performing therapeutic barbiturate anesthesia, it is advisable to monitor the arteriovenous oxygen difference, since there is a risk of developing oligemic cerebral hypoxia [6].
Clarify the form and dose according to the instructions for Sodium thiopental** (N01AF barbiturates): loading dose 8 mg/kg; maintenance dose: 3–5 mg/kg/hour [88, 122]
Initially, the drug is administered at a dose of 8 mg/kg per hour, followed by an infusion of 3 doses of 5 mcg/kg per hour and maintenance of the achieved plasma barbiturate concentration by administering them using an automatic perfusion pump at a dose of 1 mg/kg per hour. The duration of infusion is at least 48 hours.
The use of barbiturates for elevated ICP in children with severe TBI has been practiced since the 1970s. One of the first publications was by Marshall et al., who reported that the use of barbiturates in patients with refractory intracranial hypertension improves outcomes in severe TBI.
Clinical studies on the use of barbiturates in children are limited to two case reports, which precludes definitive conclusions. Based on these data, it can only be hypothesized that barbiturates are effective in treating persistent intracranial hypertension in children; however, their effect on survival or neurological outcome improvement has not been established. High-dose barbiturate therapy leads to arterial hypotension in both children and adults, which requires appropriate hemodynamic monitoring [3, 11, 17-20].
It is not recommended to use glucocorticoids (H02AB) to improve outcomes or reduce ICP in children with severe TBI [18].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Hyperventilation
It is recommended to consider hyperventilation in pediatric TBI patients (0-18 years) as a temporary, emergency measure to reduce elevated intracranial pressure—for example, during patient transfer to the operating room, when all conservative measures fail, and there is a threat of developing or worsening herniation syndrome [18, 89].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
When using hyperventilation, it is advisable to monitor the adequacy of brain oxygen supply by measuring SvjO2 and/or PbrO2. SvjO2 values between 55% and 75% are considered normal, provided there is adequate arterial blood oxygenation. The normal PbrO2 is 25-35 mmHg at an arterial oxygen tension of 80-100 mmHg [11].
Hyperventilation to PaCO2 <30 mmHg is not recommended for the prevention of intracranial hypertension (especially in the first 48 hours) in pediatric TBI patients (0-18 years) [17-19]. Hyperventilation is contraindicated at pCO2 <28 mmHg.
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
The reduction of intracranial pressure during hyperventilation is due to vasoconstriction (induced by hypocapnia) and a decrease in cerebral blood flow (CBF). Recent studies involving adults and children have shown that hyperventilation reduces brain oxygenation and leads to ischemia [3, 7]. In a study by Stringer et al. [10], the authors demonstrated that hyperventilation caused a simultaneous decrease in CBF in both damaged and presumably intact brain areas. The authors showed a correlation between the degree of hypocapnia and the incidence of cerebral ischemia. The incidence of regional ischemia was 28.9% during normocapnia and increased to 59.4% and 73.1% at PaCO2 of 25-35 mmHg and <25 mmHg, respectively. Experimental studies have shown that prophylactic hypocapnia, in addition to reducing CBF, alters the buffering capacity of cerebrospinal fluid, and the significance of this effect may outweigh its impact on CBF [5].
Despite the lack of published data on the benefits of hyperventilation in children with severe TBI, it continues to be widely used. No randomized controlled trials have been conducted on the effect of hyperventilation on various aspects of severe TBI in children, such as refractory intracranial hypertension or the development of herniation syndrome.
Hypothermia
It is recommended to administer moderate hypothermia (32-33°C) immediately following severe TBI for 48 hours in pediatric patients (0-18 years) to prevent secondary brain injury [4, 12, 19].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended that rewarming in pediatric TBI patients (0-18 years) undergoing hypothermia be performed at a rate of 0.5-1.0 degree Celsius every 12-24 hours [18].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Cooling the patient to the target temperature must be done very rapidly (within 30-60 minutes), while rewarming should be very slow (0.2-0.3°C per hour). Patient cooling may be accompanied by serious complications: hypocoagulation, increased diuresis, electrolyte disturbances, impaired humidification of respiratory gases, and infectious complications (adapted from adult guidelines).
There are significant doubts regarding the prophylactic use of hypothermia in children with TBI. Several studies, including two class II evidence studies, have shown that mild or moderate hypothermia compared to normothermia helps reduce intracranial hypertension. However, the efficacy of this therapy compared to other treatment modalities, including first-line drugs or targeted therapy for refractory intracranial hypertension, remains unclear. Furthermore, conflicting results have been reported regarding the effect of hypothermia on mortality and/or outcomes.
3.1.2.8. Prevention and treatment of pulmonary complications
It is recommended for children with severe TBI:
To prevent gastroesophageal reflux, patients should be placed in a lateral position with the head of the bed elevated [90, 91, 131, 132] and receive enteral nutrition via a nasojejunal tube [92, 93, 133, 134].
Early endotracheal intubation and maintenance of adequate endotracheal tube cuff pressure (20-25 cm H2O) are necessary. Continuous subglottic suctioning is used to prevent aspiration [94, 95, 135, 136].
If mechanical ventilation exceeds 5 days, a tracheostomy must be performed [96, 137].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Comments:
Indications for tracheostomy:
a) Facial skeletal injuries
b) Sinusitis
c) Prolonged intubation exceeding one month
d) Bulbar disorders
It is recommended to perform percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in the later stages of treatment for severe brain injury if the patient shows signs of dysphagia [3, 7].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to prevent cross-contamination and colonization via healthcare personnel's hands in pediatric TBI patients (0-18 years) to reduce infectious complications [7, 11].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Thorough reprocessing of mechanical ventilators and flexible bronchoscopes must be carried out, alongside regular monitoring of bacterial contamination of ventilators post-sterilization.
Maintain individual use protocols for suction devices and prohibit the reuse of suction catheters. Whenever possible, specialized closed tracheobronchial suction systems and combined breathing filters should be used. Tracheobronchial suctioning must be performed wearing sterile gloves. Hands and gloves must be treated with special alcohol-based disinfectants after any manipulation involving the patient. Disposable paper towels or wipes should be used for drying hands after washing with running water.
When prescribing antibacterial therapy in children to achieve maximum efficacy, it is recommended to consider the pharmacokinetic properties of antibiotics, select doses based on their minimum inhibitory concentrations, and implement scheduled drug rotation [124].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
3.1.2.9. Prevention and treatment of intracranial suppurative complications
It is recommended to perform early drainage and lavage of the paranasal sinuses if purulent contents are present. TBI patients undergoing a postoperative head CT should also have their paranasal sinuses evaluated. If sinusitis is suspected, the patient must be examined by an otolaryngologist [11].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to adhere to aseptic techniques during neurosurgical procedures in intensive care units (dressings and lumbar punctures). Neuro-ICU personnel must strictly follow asepsis guidelines [7].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
When intracranial suppurative complications develop, intrathecal administration via lumbar puncture, lumbar drain, or ventricular catheter may be used. A lumbar drain should be placed when the cell count exceeds 400-500 cells per mm3. To prevent brain herniation, lumbar puncture and lumbar drain placement should not be performed if there are signs of axial or significant transverse shift on brain computed tomography.
If there are clinical and CT signs of ventriculitis, catheters are inserted into the anterior horns of both lateral ventricles. Antibiotic therapy is prescribed according to cerebrospinal fluid culture results. Antibacterial drugs are administered through the drain 2-6 times a day. Antibiotic administration is performed by a neurosurgeon. Intrathecal administration of systemic antibacterial drugs is carried out after dilution with normal saline** (ATX code B05XA). Vancomycin** 5 mg intrathecally is preferred (ATX code J01XA01, glycopeptide antibiotics) [125, 151, 154]. At all other times, the drain is set to passive drainage.
During ventricular or lumbar drainage, cerebrospinal fluid hyperdrainage should be avoided by positioning the drainage system's 'knee' level with the foramen of Monro or by using special closed systems that allow simultaneous measurement of CSF pressure and controlled CSF drainage. Parenteral antibiotic therapy should be discontinued 3–4 days after the complete regression of symptoms of meningitis or ventriculitis (recommendations).
3.1.2.10 Post-traumatic seizures
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) to administer antiepileptic drugs at initial therapeutic doses to prevent seizures in the presence of risk factors for post-traumatic seizures, as well as unprovoked paroxysms and epileptiform activity on EEG [11, 17, 19].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) when choosing antiepileptic drugs for prophylactic anticonvulsant therapy to prioritize medications with a neuroprotective effect (ATC code N03A (hydantoin derivatives (ATC code N03AB), barbiturates (ATC code N03AA), fatty acid derivatives)) [104].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Phenytoin** (ATC code N03AB02) may be recommended for children from three years of age, taking into account the dosage form, for the prevention of early post-traumatic seizures (PTS) [17–19]. Given the high probability of metabolic disorders in patients with severe traumatic brain injury, monitoring the drug level is recommended. [147]
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Post-traumatic seizures are defined as seizure episodes developing within 7 days after trauma, or later, 8 days or more after emerging from a coma (1). Risk factors for the development of post-traumatic seizures include injury severity, localization and nature of the injury, presence of bone fragments or foreign bodies in the brain parenchyma, depressed skull fracture, focal neurological deficit, loss of consciousness, decreased Glasgow Coma Scale score <10, duration of post-traumatic amnesia, presence of subdural or epidural hematoma, penetrating injury, chronic alcoholism, and age. The incidence of PTS in children with TBI is approximately 10%. In infants and young children, the seizure threshold is lower.
Pathophysiological changes in the hippocampus are considered as mechanisms for the development of post-traumatic epilepsy, including axonal sprouting, impaired potassium depolarization of glial cell plasma membranes, dysfunction of Schaffer collaterals, apoptosis of neurons adjacent to the lesion, and activation of the TrkB-ERK1/2-CREB/ELK-1 signaling pathway in the hippocampus. Recent studies suggest a role for albumin-induced changes in the electrophysiological properties of astrocytes, mediated by the transforming growth factor-beta receptor and leading to extracellular potassium accumulation (27, 28).
Computed tomography, electroencephalography, and magnetic resonance imaging are the most significant methods for diagnosing post-traumatic epilepsy. These neuroimaging methods in the acute period of traumatic brain injury allow for the identification of lesion foci corresponding to risk factors for the development of post-traumatic epilepsy.
During the EEG examination, attention is paid to the presence of epileptiform activity patterns or epileptic seizures according to the criteria for identifying epileptiform activity. At the same time, it is important to note that the development of epileptic seizures necessitates brain CT (MRI) and an EEG examination.
3.1.2.11. Nutrition for patients with severe TBI
The acute and early periods of severe TBI are characterized by the development of hypermetabolism and hypercatabolism, which causes malnutrition and the loss of a significant portion of muscle mass in this category of patients. A direct correlation has been established between malnutrition in critically ill patients and their mortality—the higher the energy deficit, the more frequently they experience severe multiple organ failure and death. As early as 1936, H.O. Studley noted that when patients lost more than 20% of their body weight, postoperative mortality reached 33%, whereas with adequate nutrition it was no more than 3.5%.
Over recent decades, our understanding of the role of molecular and biological effects of nutrients in maintaining homeostasis in critically ill patients has advanced significantly. The main tasks of nutritional support in the complex therapy of severe TBI are: preserving body muscle mass, maintaining an adequate immune response, and preventing metabolic complications [3, 7, 11, 13].
Early initiation of enteral nutrition is recommended as a therapeutic strategy that reduces the patient's length of stay in the intensive care unit, decreases the number of complications, and positively affects recovery outcomes [97, 137].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Initiation of enteral feeding
Nutritional therapy (tube feeding) is recommended to restore metabolism and maintain vital functions in the form of enteral nutrition (EN) for a child with a traumatic brain injury (0–18 years) who cannot eat normally [18].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended to start EN for pediatric patients (0–18 years) within the first 24–48 hours after admission to the ICU in the absence of contraindications [97].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Comments:
EN helps preserve the barrier and immunological functions of the intestine through microbiome normalization and the synthesis of secretory IgA (GALT). It is important to reach 80% of the calculated protein and calorie requirements by 5–7 days after the initiation of EN
To assess the patient's nutritional status in routine practice, anthropometric evaluation should be performed, including measurement of height, weight, and body mass index (BMI), as well as the dynamics of these indicators [97, 126].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Comments:
Traditional laboratory tools for nutritional assessment (total protein, serum albumin, prealbumin, retinol-binding protein, and anthropometry) have not proven their reliability as markers of muscle mass status.
Choice of feeding method
EN is recommended as the preferred feeding method for critically ill patients in the absence of contraindications [97, 127].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Patients receiving EN are recommended to be assessed for the risk of aspiration [100, 128].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) with signs of dysphagia to use alternative feeding routes: nasogastric or nasojejunal; if prolonged tube feeding is anticipated, gastrostomy placement is indicated [101, 129].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
If there are signs of protein-energy malnutrition upon admission and EN is impossible, it is recommended to start PN as soon as possible after admission and adequate resuscitation measures [102, 138].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Dosing of enteral nutrition
It is recommended to calculate the volume of EN for pediatric patients (0–18 years), determined by energy requirements, using indirect calorimetry [103, 139].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
In the absence of indirect calorimetry, predictive equations can be used. Predictive equations should be used with caution as they provide a less accurate estimate of energy expenditure than indirect calorimetry. In obese patients, energy requirements calculated using predictive equations should be based on ideal body weight, and in malnourished patients, on actual body weight
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) to monitor energy requirements regularly at least once every 7 days to control nutritional needs. If 100% of the target requirements cannot be met by day 7–10 via the enteral route alone, nutritional requirements may be adjusted using PN [18, 129].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) to continuously assess protein losses for the timely correction of nutritional requirements [127, 134].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
The use of additional modular protein supplements or high-protein enteral formulas helps reduce nitrogen losses, thereby helping to minimize muscle mass loss
Patient positioning during feeding.
It is recommended to elevate the head of the bed to 45 degrees to reduce the risk of aspiration complications in patients with severe TBI, in the absence of contraindications [91, 97].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Improving tolerance to enteral nutrition
It is recommended to use enteral nutrition protocols, which improve the management and monitoring of patients with severe TBI [97, 98, 100].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Comments:
Regular monitoring of EN tolerance allows for the early detection of intolerance signs and the timely correction of emerging disorders by changing the enteral formula, feeding regimen, administration rate, and/or feeding volume.
To accurately assess patients' energy expenditure, the method of indirect calorimetry should be used. In the absence of a metabolograph, patients' energy requirements are calculated using formulas.
Nutrition can be administered both enterally and parenterally. The advantages of enteral nutrition over parenteral nutrition include a lower risk of hyperglycemia and infectious complications. For enteral nutrition, a nasogastric/orogastric tube is placed. If gastric feeding is ineffective for more than 2 days, an intestinal tube is placed. In this case, special semi-elemental formulas should be used for feeding patients. If long-term enteral tube feeding for more than 4 weeks is required, gastrostomy placement is possible (recommendation). Whenever possible, preference should be given to enteral nutrition. In children, 130 to 160% of metabolic expenditure should be provided [15].
The use of parenteral nutrition in children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is of great importance. Just like adults, children with severe TBI need to have their energy requirements met for the effective recovery from injuries, body functioning, and prevention of other pathological conditions initiated by trauma. In children, energy requirements necessary for normal growth and development are higher than in adults. The decision to use parenteral nutrition, including timing, amount, route, and composition of such support, can significantly affect short- and long-term outcomes.
The results of a phase II randomized controlled trial showed no difference in outcomes in children receiving standard nutrition versus nutrition including immunomodulators.
3.2. Surgical treatment of TBI
3.2.1. Decompressive craniectomy
Decompressive craniectomy with duraplasty may be recommended in the event of a threat/progression of herniation syndrome or the development of refractory intracranial hypertension in children with severe TBI [3, 4, 10, 11, 17–21, 67, 68].
GCR BLOE 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 1)
Comments:
Decompressive craniectomy can be used as an adjunctive procedure during the removal of mass-effect lesions (intracranial hematomas, contusions) when there is a threat of progressive brain edema (secondary decompressive craniectomy).
Decompressive craniectomy is used as a last resort when conservative therapy measures are ineffective. The main goal of decompressive craniectomy is to increase intracranial volume, thereby reducing intracranial pressure and improving the functional state of the brain. The timing of decompression is determined by the results of clinical examination, the dynamics of neurological disorders, the level of ICP elevation, or the resistance of this elevation to various conservative treatment options. Primary decompressive craniectomy as a surgical method for controlling intracranial pressure remains a subject of debate. Two randomized trials have focused on the use of decompressive craniectomy for ICP control in adults: the DECRA trial (1), the results of which showed a decrease in ICP after decompressive craniectomy without improved outcomes (2), and the RescueICP trial (3). In the pediatric population, such studies have not been conducted, and the evidence base is lacking.
There are several types of decompressive craniectomy. It may consist of unilateral and bilateral subtemporal decompression, hemispheric craniectomies, circular craniectomy, or bifrontal craniectomy. The choice of method depends on CT findings.
Contraindications to decompressive craniotomy:
Atonic coma (GCS score of 3 + bilateral mydriasis + muscle atonia and areflexia) without subsequent improvement during resuscitation measures and associated with:
– primary brainstem contusion according to CT (MRI) with clinical features of irreversible permanent damage (GCS score of 3 from the moment of injury);
– secondary ischemic brainstem injury against the background of herniation syndrome with clinical features of permanent irreversible damage (GCS score of 3 + bilateral mydriasis + muscle atonia and areflexia);
– reverberating blood flow (or absence of blood flow) in the main cerebral arteries of the base of the brain bilaterally on transcranial Doppler ultrasonography combined with the clinical presentation of atonic coma;
– absence of blood flow in the four basins of the main cerebral arteries according to MR angiography combined with the clinical presentation of atonic coma;
– absence of bilateral auditory brainstem evoked potentials combined with reverberating (or absent) cerebral blood flow
3.2.2. Surgical treatment of acute epidural hematomas
It is recommended to remove an epidural hematoma with a volume greater than 30 cm3 regardless of the level of consciousness to eliminate brain compression. In selected cases, with a slight excess of the specified epidural hematoma volume and a fully compensated condition of the patient without herniation symptoms, a conservative approach with serial CT monitoring is acceptable [7, 11, 21].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
With a smaller hematoma volume, indications for removal include a total volume of the pathological lesion greater than 60 cm3, compression of the ambient cistern, and a decrease in the patient's level of consciousness from the time of injury to surgery.
An epidural hematoma with a volume of less than 30 cm3, a thickness of less than 15 mm, and a midline shift of less than 3 mm in conscious patients with no focal neurological symptoms may be managed conservatively (with careful neurological and CT monitoring in a neurosurgical inpatient unit) [11, 18, 21].
There is no consensus regarding surgical intervention techniques, but it is believed that craniotomy provides more complete evacuation of the hematoma [1, 3, 4, 10, 21].
3.2.3. Surgical treatment of acute subdural hematomas
Emergency surgical intervention for hematoma removal is recommended regardless of the patient's level of consciousness in cases of acute subdural hematoma with a volume greater than 30 cm3, a thickness greater than 10 mm, or a midline shift greater than 5 mm [11, 21].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence - 5)
Surgical intervention in the scope of primary decompressive craniectomy and removal of subdural hematoma is recommended for patients with a hematoma thickness of less than 10 mm and a midline shift of less than 5 mm, when there is a decrease in the level of consciousness by 2 or more points on the GCS from the time of injury to admission to the hospital, progression of herniation syndrome, and an increase in ICP above 20 mm Hg [11, 17, 18, 21].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence - 5)
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years old) to perform decompressive craniectomy to drain a traumatic subdural hematoma in cases of acute subdural hematoma causing midline shift and refractory intracranial hypertension [11, 18, 148].
GCR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 3)
3.2.4. Surgical treatment of brain contusions
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years old) to undergo surgical treatment for focal brain lacerations causing progressive deterioration of neurological status, persistent intracranial hypertension refractory to conservative treatment, and the presence of mass-effect signs on computed tomography scans [11, 18, 21].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Indications for surgical removal of contusions include a decrease in consciousness to coma with contusions in the frontal and temporal lobes with a volume greater than 20 cm3, if the midline shift is greater than 5 mm and/or there are signs of compression of the brain cisterns on computed tomography scans, as well as if the volume of the contusion exceeds 50 cm2 [Note: keeping original tag placement as requested, standardizing text superscript].
Patients with cerebral contusions without signs of neurological deterioration, as well as with controlled ICP and a minor mass effect on computed tomography, may be treated conservatively provided that monitoring and serial CT are performed [21, 105].
3.2.5. Indications for surgery in posterior cranial fossa lesions
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years old) to undergo surgical treatment for posterior fossa injuries, including epidural hematomas with a volume greater than 10 cm3, a thickness greater than 15 mm, with obstructive hydrocephalus, lateral shift, and compression of the fourth ventricle [11, 21].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Conservative treatment in patients with posterior fossa structural injuries can be performed for epidural hematomas with a volume of less than 10 cm3, lateral cerebellar lesions of less than 10 cm3, absence of fourth ventricle shift, and brainstem symptoms.
A wait-and-see approach in patients with posterior fossa structural injuries is possible for epidural hematomas with a volume of 10 to 20 cm3 and cerebellar lesions of 10 to 20 cm3 in a lateral location [21].
It is recommended to take into account the level of consciousness, the condition of the fundus, and brainstem auditory evoked potentials when determining treatment tactics. Such patients require serial CT scans due to the risk of delayed hematomas, rapid development of cerebrospinal fluid pathway occlusion, and patient decompensation [7,11,15].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
3.2.6. Surgical treatment of depressed skull fractures
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) to undergo surgical intervention for depressed skull fractures exceeding the thickness of the bone [21].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
Indications for surgical treatment are:
bone fragment depression greater than the thickness of the bone,
dural tear,
damage to the paranasal sinuses, pneumocephalus,
presence of a hematoma,
cosmetic defect,
wound contamination.
Elevation of the depression and surgical debridement of the wound are the core elements of the surgery. Management of open depressed fractures should include the use of systemic antibacterial drugs.
Patients with a depressed skull fracture are recommended to be managed conservatively if the depression is less than the bone thickness and there are no signs of dural tear. Pediatric patients under 1 year of age with "ping-pong" ball skull fractures and a depression of less than 5 mm may also be managed conservatively [11,21]
It is recommended that children with a depressed skull fracture undergo early surgical intervention to reduce the risk of wound infection [18,20].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) to undergo primary cranioplasty in the absence of wound infection [18,20].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Conservative treatment of a closed depressed fracture is recommended to be decided on an individual basis for each pediatric TBI patient (0–18 years) [18,20].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
3.3. Other treatment. Other treatment methods are not used for traumatic brain injury in children
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
The goal of rehabilitation is the fastest possible recovery of lost functions and the improvement of the quality of life for both the child and their family members [69,70].
As part of early rehabilitation, it is fundamentally important to identify the primary pathogenetic link hindering further recovery [26, 71]. The age aspect is of critical importance. The younger the child, the more differences there are in the complex of rehabilitative measures, where an extremely complex task comes to the fore: restoring conditions for the further development of motor and cognitive functions.
The pathogenetic impact of the damaging factor on the body of a growing child must be constantly re-evaluated, and the goals and objectives of rehabilitation must be continually refined in order to facilitate progress through the corresponding stages of development and recovery. This necessitates regular multidisciplinary discussions during the rehabilitation process, especially in the early period when spontaneous recovery processes are most pronounced [6,8,12,26].
Rehabilitation must be based on the patient's preserved functions (M. Dimitrijevic, 2012). It is mandatory in the rehabilitation of children with the consequences of severe TBI to use the International Classification of Functioning to assess the degree of impaired functions, determine the recovery prognosis, and formulate a rehabilitation diagnosis [6].
It is recommended to conduct comprehensive phased rehabilitation for children who have suffered severe traumatic brain injury, after stabilization and recovery of vital functions [69, 72, 73].
LGR CLEL 3Level of Recommendation Credibility C (Level of Evidence Reliability - 3)
Rehabilitation is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) to begin as early as possible in the acute and hyperacute periods of TBI in the intensive care unit, continue in the intensive care ward of the neurosurgical/traumatological department, and on the beds of a specialized department (first-early rehabilitation stage at V-IV supervision levels) involving a multidisciplinary team of specialists [6,8,26, 74-79].
GPP BLOE 2Level of Evidence B (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 2)
Comments:
After discharge from the primary hospital, rehabilitation continues at the second stage in a 24-hour department/center for patients with central nervous system injuries (second stage of rehabilitation – at III-IV supervision levels). The third stage of rehabilitation is carried out in an outpatient rehabilitation department, a rehabilitation day hospital, or in the form of tele-rehabilitation. Each stage has its own goals, objectives, and composition of the multidisciplinary team [6, 8].
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) to include specialists in motor and cognitive rehabilitation in the multidisciplinary team, including a defectologist [79].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) at all stages, taking into account continuity and determination of rehabilitation potential, to form an individualized rehabilitation program considering pathophysiological mechanisms promising for rehabilitation [1-4, 71, 72, 79, 80].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
Pediatric TBI patients of varying severity are at risk of developing post-traumatic complications. The probability of developing complications is directly proportional to the severity of brain damage. Complications include post-traumatic epilepsy, hydrocephalus, cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSF leak), cranial vault defects, chronic hematomas, and subdural collections [81-83].
It is recommended after the completion of treatment to have follow-up examinations by a pediatric neurosurgeon or pediatric neurologist during the first year every 3 months, then every 6 months, and thereafter as needed [81-85].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Comments:
The examination during the first year of dispensary follow-up includes brain CT/MRI, electroencephalography, consultation with a neurologist, ophthalmologist, and otolaryngologist.
6. Organization of Medical Care
6.1. Prehospital stage:
- medical care is provided by a paramedic or an emergency medical team, with a preference for specialized pediatric teams
- restoration and stabilization of vital functions are performed
- assessment of the severity of the condition
- immediate transfer to a specialized pediatric hospital
- during the transportation of a moderately severe/severe patient with a threat of vital disorders (GCS <12 points), the paramedic/emergency physician is obliged to notify the hospital about the transported patient.
6.2. Admission department
Hospitalization of pediatric patients with vital disorders or with the threat of their development is recommended through the shock room, where resuscitation measures must be continued/initiated. Resuscitation measures accompany the diagnostic stage and are continuous in nature. The main goal is to identify and eliminate the primary pathophysiological mechanism posing a threat to life.
Patients exhibiting the following symptoms are directed to the shock room
Hemodynamic instability
Respiratory disorders
GCS <13 points
Paresis, paralysis
Suspected (presence of) spinal and spinal cord injury
Seizures
Suspected/presence of chest injury
Open fractures
Suspected unstable pelvic bone fractures
It is recommended that the initial examination of a patient with moderate-to-severe TBI be performed by a medical council (consilium) involving a neurosurgeon, an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist, a pediatric surgeon, and a trauma and orthopedic surgeon [33].
GPP CLOE 4Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 4)
Comments:
If necessary, taking into account the location and nature of injuries, pediatric specialists of other fields are involved: ophthalmologists, otolaryngologists, maxillofacial surgeons, urologists, etc.
The purpose of the consilium is to diagnose all injuries, identify the leading life-threatening injury, and determine the stages and scope of specialized care delivery.
In the absence of a shock room, patients can be hospitalized directly into the intensive care unit, bypassing the admission department.
6.3. Inpatient stage
Patients with mild and moderate TBI (GCS 15-13 points) are hospitalized in the neurosurgery department.
Patients with moderate and severe TBI (GCS 12-3 points) are hospitalized in the intensive care unit.
Patients who do not require emergency surgical interventions during the recovery and stabilization of vital functions undergo advanced neuromonitoring, including intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure monitoring.
Patients requiring emergency surgical interventions must be transferred to the operating room.
After the stabilization of the injured child's condition, the patient is transferred to the neurosurgery department.
6.4. Rehabilitation stage. Rehabilitation measures begin in the intensive care unit and continue at all stages of specialized care delivery (stages I–II of rehabilitation).
7. Additional Information
Prognosis and Outcomes
The Glasgow Coma Scale (Appendices G1, G2) is recommended as one of the earliest and most highly reliable predictors of TBI prognosis and outcomes in children [1-3, 9, 11, 17-19, 22, 23, 25].
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments:
The probability of a favorable outcome is directly proportional to the GCS score. Favorable outcomes are reliably more frequent (66%) at a higher level of consciousness (7-8 points). All outcomes in children with a consciousness level of 3-4 points are unfavorable, and mortality reaches 82% [25,26].
Outcomes depending on the level of consciousness
GCS | Outcome | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Favorable outcome | Adverse outcome | Mortality rate | |
3-4 | 0 | 100% | 82% |
5-6 | 35% | 36% | 29% |
7-8 | 66% | 34% | 6% |
The prognostic significance of the child's age as a predictor of severe TBI outcome remains uncertain, as evidenced by ongoing discrepancies in recent studies [21,23,26,28]. The child's age rather determines the mechanism of injury, which in turn determines the pattern of brain damage. Infants are more frequently subjected to abusive head trauma. Younger children more commonly sustain injuries from falls from a height and road traffic accidents (RTAs). RTAs remain the leading cause of trauma in preschool, school-age children, and adolescents, followed less frequently by falls from a height. [28]
7.1 Pupil reactivity
Pupil diameter and the presence of the pupillary light reflex are among the early and highly reliable predictors of prognosis and outcomes in pediatric TBI [1-4]. Pupil diameter and the light reflex can be easily and reliably assessed at any time post-injury. This parameter remains an independent and highly reliable predictor of severe TBI outcome in children and is widely used in clinical practice.
Injury to the orbit or oculomotor nerve accompanied by pupillary dilation limits the use of this predictor in prognosis.
Favorable outcomes are significantly more frequent in patients with normal pupil size and preserved light reflex (62%), whereas unfavorable outcomes occur in children with mydriasis and absent light reflex (89%), Table 4.
7.2 Arterial hypotension
Arterial hypotension impairs cerebral perfusion, leads to secondary strokes, increases ICP, causes brain edema, and ultimately significantly worsens the outcome of severe TBI in children.
Arterial hypotension in children older than 10 years is conventionally defined as a drop in systolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg. For children under 10 years old, arterial hypotension is defined as a drop in systolic blood pressure below 70 + (2 × age) mm Hg, and for infants in the first year of life, less than 70 mm Hg [11,19].
7.3 Associated injuries
The severity of polytrauma >50 scores is a risk factor for an adverse outcome of severe TBI. Associated injuries contribute to the development of pathophysiological processes that can lead to secondary brain injury. Acute blood loss, traumatic shock, and acute respiratory failure are accompanied by hemodynamic impairment, decreased cerebral perfusion, and brain hypoxia. All of these are factors of secondary brain injury and are considered independent predictors of severe TBI outcome [1,3,11,19].
In patients with a GCS consciousness level of 6 scores and higher, favorable injury outcomes are significantly more frequent at an ISS value below 32 scores (ISS ≤32), whereas unfavorable outcomes are significantly more frequent at an ISS value greater than 40 scores (ISS >40) [22].
7.4 Neuroimaging findings
It is recommended for pediatric patients (0–18 years) to consider the state of the basal cisterns, midline shift, presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage, and determination of intracranial hemorrhage and contusion volumes based on brain CT/MRI findings both as indications for surgical treatment and as prognostically significant factors for the prognosis and outcome of severe TBI [11,18,21]
GPP CLOE 5Level of Evidence C (Level of Likeness/Evidence — 5)
Comments: Mortality with open basal cisterns is 22%, and in the absence of cisterns, 77%. The "state of the basal cisterns" sign shows the highest sensitivity in predicting a favorable outcome in patients with a level of consciousness of 6–8 GCS scores. In addition, compression or absence of basal cisterns is a sign of intracranial hypertension. The risk of developing intracranial hypertension with compression or absence of cisterns increases threefold, and the risk of mortality doubles [2,3,11,18,21,23].
Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) occurs in an average of 40% of severe TBI cases and also has prognostic value. Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage are at risk for developing acute subdural hematomas, intraventricular hemorrhages, and intracranial hypertension. Traumatic SAH, in addition to the state of the ambient cisterns, the presence of mass effects, and midline shift, increases the prognostic value of CT findings.
Midline shift of the brain is also a predictor of severe TBI outcome. In most domestic and international studies, a shift of more than 10 mm is considered an extremely unfavorable factor, with a mortality rate exceeding 80% with such a shift. The volume of the mass effect also has prognostic value; the risk of an adverse outcome increases with an increasing volume of the intracranial hematoma and the magnitude of the midline shift.
Computed tomography findings such as the degree of ambient cistern compression, the presence of a mass effect and traumatic SAH, and midline shift formed the basis of the Rotterdam prognostic CT score. The probability of mortality in children increases in direct proportion to the score assessed by the Rotterdam prognostic CT score. Its prognostic accuracy is low for diffuse injuries [22].
7.5 Marshall CT prognostic scale
It is based on the evaluation of a combination of data: the presence of a contusion volume greater than 25 ml, the degree of ambient cistern compression, the presence of midline shift, and the presence of a mass effect requiring surgical evacuation [21]. The Marshall classification proved useful not only for determining treatment tactics but also demonstrated itself as a reliable predictor of outcome. Favorable outcomes are significantly more frequent in diffuse injuries I–II and in situations with an evacuated mass effect, whereas unfavorable outcomes are more frequent in diffuse injuries III–IV and in the presence of a mass effect requiring surgical evacuation.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
No. | Quality criteria | Evaluation of compliance |
|---|---|---|
1. | An examination by a neurosurgeon and/or trauma and orthopedic surgeon and/or anesthesiologist-resuscitator was performed no later than 1 hour from the moment of admission to the hospital | Yes/No |
2. | Assessment of condition using the Glasgow Coma Scale was performed | Yes/No |
3. | Tracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation performed (for Glasgow Coma Scale score of 9 or below) | Yes/No |
4. | Neuromonitoring, respiratory, circulatory, and blood oxygenation monitoring performed (for Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or below) | Yes/No |
5. | Brain computed tomography performed when indicated, no later than 3 hours after hospital admission | Yes/No |
6. | Follow-up computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain performed (in case of surgical intervention for intracranial hematoma) | Yes/No |
7 | Neurosurgical intervention performed when surgical indications are present | Yes\No |
8 | Removal of epidural hematoma performed (for epidural hematoma volume greater than 30 cm3) | Yes\No |
References
Show references
Artaryan A.A., Iova A.S., Garmashov Yu.A., Banin A.V. Pediatric traumatic brain injury / Clinical Guide, vol. 2, Moscow, Antidor. - 2001., pp. 603-648.
Valiullina S.A., Semenova Zh.B., Sharova E.V. Organizational, economic, and managerial aspects of providing medical care to children with traumatic brain injury. - Rossiyskiy Pediatricheskiy Zhurnal, no. 2, 2010.
Konovalov A.N., Potapov A.A., Likhterman L.B. // Traumatic brain injury. Clinical Guide. In 3 volumes // Moscow, 1998-2002
Krylov V.V., Talypov A.E., Puras Yu.V. Decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury // Moscow, 2014
Lekmanov A.U., Petlakh V.I. Emergency medical care for children injured in road traffic accidents // Russian Bulletin of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, 2012, no. 4, pp. 79-87
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth (ICF-CY). – M.: 2016 2
Potapov A.A., Krylov V.V., Likhterman L.B., Talypov A.E., Gavrilov A.G., Petrikov S.S. Clinical guidelines "Treatment of patients with severe traumatic brain injury". Draft of the Association of Neurosurgeons of Russia, 2015.
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 878n dated October 23, 2019 "On approval of the Procedure for organizing medical rehabilitation for children" 1
Roshal L.M., Semenova Zh.B., Bagaev V.G., et al. Protocol for providing pre-hospital care to injured children with severe isolated and concomitant traumatic brain injury (Guidelines of the Healthcare Department) Moscow, 2008
Semenova Zh.B. Stages of care delivery for children with traumatic brain injury. Tasks of the neurosurgeon. Journal of Pediatric Neurology and Neurosurgery, no. 3-4, 2012, pp. 75-83
Semenova Zh.B., Melnikov A.V., Savvina I.A., Lekmanov A.U., Khachatryan V.A., Gorelyshev S.K. Guidelines for the management of children with traumatic brain injury. Russian Bulletin of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesiology and Intensive Care. 2016. Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 112-131.
Kraus J.F. Neurotrauma. Chapter 2. Epidemiology of brain ingury. Ed. R. Narayan et al.- McGraw Hill – USA. – 1996. – P. 13-30.
A.S.P.N. Clinical guidelines: nutrition support of the critically ill child
Andrew I.R. Maas, Mark Dearden, Franco Servadei, Nino Stocchetti and Andreas Unterberg Current Recomendations for Neurotrauma” CurrOpinCrit Care 2000, 6:281- 292
Bullock M. R et al. // Surgical Management of Traumatic Brain Injury 2002// Brain Trauma Foundation, USA
Lewartowska-Nyga D., Nyga K., Skotnicka-Klonowicz G. Can Infrascanner be useful in hospital emergency departments for diagnosing minor head injury in children? // Developmental Period Medicine. – 2017. – Vol. 21. – No. 1. – pp. 51-59.
Guidelines for acute medical management of severe traumatic brain injury in infants, children, and adolenscents // PediatrCrit Care Med - 2012 - Vol. 13 - No. 1 (Suppl.)
Guidelines for the Management of Pediatric Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Third Edition: Update of the Brain Trauma Foundation Guidelines// PediatrCrit Care Med – 2019; 20:S1-S82
Guidelines for the Pre-hospital Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Second Edition, Brain Trauma Foundation, 2007
Guidlines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury // J of Neurotrauma, v 24, 1(suppl.) - 2007
Guidlines for the Surgical Management of Trauma Brain Injury // Neurosurgery- 58-S2- 1-S2-3, 2006
Hwang S.Y., Ong J.W., Ng Z.M., Foo C.Y., Chua S.Z., Sri D., Lee J.H., Chong S.L. // Long-term outcomes in children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a singlr-centre retrospective study / Brain Inj. – 2019. – 33(11). – P.1420-1424. DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2019.1641625. 4
Meshcheryakov S. V., Z. B. Semenova, V. I. Lukianov, E. G. Sorokina, O. V. Karaseva //Prognosis of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes in Children / Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement. – 2018. – 126. – P.11-17/ 4
Nilesh M Mehta,Charlene Compher,A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directorshttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
P. Perel, M. Arango, T. Clayton [et al.] // Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients. MRC CRASH Trial Collaborators [Text] / BMJ. – 2008. – Vol. 336, N.7641. – P. 425-429. 3
Pediatric rehabilitation: principles and Practice / [edited by] Michael A. Alexander, Dennis J. Matthews; associate editor Kevin P. Murphy. – Fifth edition. – 622p. 3
Robertson CS, Zager EL, Narayan RK, Handly N, Sharma A, Hanley DF, Garza H, Maloney-Wilensky E, Plaum JM, Koenig CH, Johnson A, Morgan T.; Clinical Evaluation of a Portable Near-Infrared Device for Detection of Traumatic Intracranial Hematomas; J Neurotrauma 2010;27(9):1597-1604
Samuel F. Huth, Antony Slater, Michaela Waak, Karen Barlow, Sainath Raman // Predicting Neurological Recovery after Traumatic Brain Injury in Children: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Models / J Neurotrauma. – 2020. – Oct 15. – 37(20). P.2141-2149. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7158. 2
Semenova ZhB, Marshintsev AV, Melnikov AV, Meshcheryakov SV, Adayev AR, Lukyanov VI.; Infrascanner TM in the diagnosis of intracranial lesions in children with traumatic brain injuries.; Brain Inj. 2016;30(1):18-22
Sharon Shaklai, Relly Peretz Fish, M. Simantov, Z. Groswasser // Prognostic factors in childhood-acquired brain injury // Brain Inj. – 2018. – 32(5). – P.533-539. DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2018.1431843.
Shirley I. Stiver, M.D., Ph.D., and Geoffrey T. Manley, M.D., Ph.D.: Prehospital management of traumatic brain injury; Neurosurg Focus 25 (4): E5, 2008
Woolf S. H. // Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. // ArchInternMed. 1992 May;152(5):946-52.
Kambal M. A. et al. Managing traumatic brain injury in children: When do we need a computed tomography of the head? // Sudanese Journal of Paediatrics. – 2014. – Vol. 14. – No. 1. – pp. 89.
Pandor, A., Harnan, S., Goodacre, S., Pickering, A., Fitzgerald, P., & Rees, A. (2012). Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Characteristics for Identifying CT Abnormality after Minor Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Neurotrauma, 29(5), 707–718. doi:10.1089/neu.2011.1967
Saadat S. et al. Determinants of mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury //Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. – 2012. – Vol. 18. – No. 3. – P. 219-224.
Chong, S.-L., Barbier, S., Liu, N., Ong, G. Y.-K., Ng, K. C., & Ong, M. E. H. (2015). Predictors for moderate to severe paediatric head injury derived from a surveillance registry in the emergency department. Injury, 46(7), 1270–1274. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.04.002
Yanagawa Y. Studying patients of severe traumatic brain injury with severe abdominal injury in Japan //Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock. – 2011. – Vol. 4. – No. 3. – P. 355.
Ho C. H. et al. Impact of grouping complications on mortality in traumatic brain injury: A nationwide population-based study //PloS one. – 2018. – Vol. 13. – No. 1. – P. e0190683.
Stewart T. C., Alharfi I. M., Fraser D. D. The role of serious concomitant injuries in the treatment and outcome of pediatric severe traumatic brain injury //Journal of trauma and acute care surgery. – 2013. – Vol. 75. – No. 5. – P. 836-842.
Kamal H. M. et al. Fall of platelet count in children with traumatic brain injury: is it of value? //Chinese journal of traumatology. – 2011. – Vol. 14. – No. 6. – P. 336-342.
Affonseca C. A. et al. Coagulation disorder in children and adolescents with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury //Jornal de pediatria. – 2007. – Vol. 83. – P. 274-282.
Talving, P., Lustenberger, T., Lam, L., Inaba, K., Mohseni, S., Plurad, D., … Demetriades, D. (2011). Coagulopathy After Isolated Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 71(5), 1205–1210. doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e31820d151d
Rahimi, S., Bidabadi, E., Mashouf, M., Seyed Saadat, S. M., & Rahimi, S. (2013). Prognostic value of arterial blood gas disturb-ances for in-hospital mortality in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochirurgica, 156(1), 187–192. doi:10.1007/s00701-013-1929-0
Yang, K., Zhao, M., Sun, J., & Nie, X. (2021). Accuracy of PECARN decision rule in minor blunt head trauma in pediatric emergency department: A meta‐analysis. International Journal of Clinical Practice. doi:10.1111/ijcp.14586
Van Goethem, J. W. M., Maes, M., Özsarlak, Ö., van den Hauwe, L., & Parizel, P. M. (2005). Imaging in spinal trauma. European Radi-ology, 15(3), 582–590. doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2625-5
Tasker R. C. Skull x rays, CT scans, and making a decision in head injury //Archives of disease in childhood. – 2005. – Vol. 90. – No. 8. – P. 774-775
Liesegang J., Siggelkow C., Weichert H. C. Computer tomographic and neurologic observations in the acute phase of closed craniocerebral injuries //Neurochirurgia. – 1984. – Vol. 27. – No. 3. – P. 62-65.
Dash M. et al. ECG changes in pediatric patients with severe head injury //Journal of neurosurgical an-esthesiology. – 2003. – Vol. 15. – No. 3. – P. 270-273.
Biyyam D. R. et al. CT Findings of Pediatric Handlebar Injuries //RadioGraphics. – 2020. – Vol. 40. – No. 3. – P. 815-826.
Shang X. L., Zhang Y. Z., Zhang X. L. Diagnoses of bronchus and lung trauma by computed tomography and X-ray examination in 37 cases: a comparative study //Di 1 jun yi da xue xue bao= Academic Journal of the First Medical College of PLA. – 2002. – Vol. 22. – No. 4. – P. 380-381.
Marco, G. G., Diego, S., Giulio, A., & Luca, S. (2005). Screening US and CT for blunt abdominal trauma: A retro-spective study. European Journal of Radiology, 56(1), 97–101. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.02.001
Parri N. et al. Point-of-care ultrasound for the diagnosis of skull fractures in children younger than two years of age //The Journal of pediatrics. – 2018. – Vol. 196. – P. 230-236. e2.
Lindberg D. M. et al. Feasibility and accuracy of fast MRI versus CT for traumatic brain injury in young children //Pediatrics. – 2019. – Vol. 144. – No. 4.
Sheridan D. C. et al. QuickBrain MRI for the detection of acute pediatric traumatic brain injury //Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. – 2017. – Vol. 19. – No. 2. – P. 259-264.
Chan M. et al. Cervical spine injuries and collar complications in severely injured paediatric trauma patients //Spinal Cord. – 2013. – Vol. 51. – No. 5. – P. 360-364.
Nathanson M. H. et al. Guidelines for safe transfer of the brain‐injured patient: trauma and stroke, 2019: Guidelines from the Association of Anaesthetists and the Neuro Anaesthesia and Critical Care Society //Anaesthesia. – 2020. – Vol. 75. – No. 2. – P. 234-246.
Luscombe M. D., Williams J. L. Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisa-tion //Emergency medicine journal. – 2003. – Vol. 20. – No. 5. – P. 476-478.
Ketharanathan N. et al. Analgosedation in paediatric severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): practice, pitfalls and possibilities //Child's Nervous System. – 2017. – Vol. 33. – No. 10. – P. 1703-1710.
Bossers, S. M., Schwarte, L. A., Loer, S. A., Twisk, J. W. R., Bo-er, C., & Schober, P. (2015). Experience in Prehospital Endotra-cheal Intubation Significantly Influences Mortality of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLOS ONE, 10(10), e0141034. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141034
Cote C. J., Hartnick C. J. Pediatric transtracheal and cricothyrotomy airway devices for emergency use: which are appropriate for infants and children? //Pediatric Anesthesia. – 2009. – Vol. 19. – P. 66-76
Samant IV U. B. et al. Time of hypotension and discharge outcome in children with severe traumatic brain injury //Journal of Neurotrauma. – 2008. – Vol. 25. – No. 5. – P. 495-502.
Suttipongkaset P. et al. Blood pressure thresholds and mortality in pediatric traumatic brain injury //Pediatrics. – 2018. – Vol. 142. – No. 2.
Chesnut R. M. et al. Early and late systemic hypotension as a frequent and fundamental source of cerebral is-chemia following severe brain injury in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank //Monitoring of cerebral blood flow and metabolism in intensive care. – Springer, Vienna, 1993. – P. 121-125.
Tavakkoli F. Review of the role of mannitol in the therapy of children //18th Expert Committee on the selection and use of Essential Medicines. Mannitol review (Children). – 2011. – Vol. 16.
Kayhanian S. et al. Thresholds for identifying pathological intracranial pressure in paediatric traumatic brain injury //Scientific reports. – 2019. – Vol. 9. – No. 1. – P. 1-7.
Kukreti V., Mohseni-Bod H., Drake J. Management of raised intracranial pressure in children with traumatic brain injury //Journal of pediatric neurosciences. – 2014. – Vol. 9. – No. 3. – P. 207.
Sahuquillo J., Dennis J. A. Decompressive craniectomy for the treatment of high intracranial pressure in closed traumatic brain injury //Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. – 2019. – №. 12.
Lu G. et al. Decompressive craniectomy for patients with traumatic brain injury: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials //World neurosurgery. – 2020. – Vol. 133. – P. e135-e148.
Youngblut J. A. M. et al. Effects of pediatric head trauma for children, parents, and families //Critical care nurs-ing clinics of North America. – 2000. – Vol. 12. – No. 2. – P. 227-235.
Sariaslan A. et al. Long-term outcomes associated with traumatic brain injury in childhood and adoles-cence: a nationwide Swedish cohort study of a wide range of medical and social outcomes //PLoS medicine. – 2016. – Vol. 13. – No. 8. – P. e1002103.
Babikian T., Asarnow R. Neurocognitive outcomes and recovery after pediatric TBI: meta-analytic review of the literature //Neuropsychology. – 2009. – Vol. 23. – No. 3. – P. 283.
McKinlay A. et al. Long term psychosocial outcomes after mild head injury in early childhood //Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. – 2002. – Vol. 73. – No. 3. – P. 281-288.
Knight, S., Takagi, M., Fisher, E., Anderson, V., Lannin, N. A., Tavender, E., & Scheinberg, A. (2018). A systematic critical appraisal of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for the rehabilitation of children with moderate or severe acquired brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2018.05.031
Tepas III J. J. et al. The effect of delay in rehabilitation on outcome of severe traumatic brain injury //Journal of pediatric surgery. – 2009. – Vol. 44. – No. 2. – P. 368-372.
Reuter-Rice K. et al. The initiation of rehabilitation therapies and observed outcomes in pediatric trau-matic brain injury //Rehabilitation nursing: the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses. – 2018. – Vol. 43. – No. 6. – P. 327.
Königs M. et al. Effects of timing and intensity of neurorehabilitation on functional outcome after trau-matic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis //Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. – 2018. – Vol. 99. – No. 6. – P. 1149-1159. e1.
Wade S. L. et al. Online problem-solving therapy after traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial //Pediatrics. – 2015. – Vol. 135. – No. 2. – P. e487-e495.
Zhu X. L. et al. Does intensive rehabilitation improve the functional outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI)? A randomized controlled trial //Brain injury. – 2007. – Vol. 21. – No. 7. – P. 681-690.
Dénes Z. Consequence of secondary complications during the rehabilitation of patients with severe brain injury //Orvosi hetilap. – 2009. – Vol. 150. – No. 4. – P. 165-169.
Boyer M. G., Edwards P. Outcome 1 to 3 years after severe traumatic brain injury in children and ado-lescents //Injury. – 1991. – Vol. 22. – No. 4. – P. 315-320.
Keret A. et al. Posttraumatic epilepsy: long-term follow-up of children with mild traumatic brain injury //Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. – 2017. – Vol. 20. – No. 1. – P. 64-70.
Keret A. et al. The clinical characteristics of posttraumatic epilepsy following moderate-to-severe trau-matic brain injury in children //Seizure. – 2018. – Vol. 58. – P. 29-34.
Chen K. H. et al. Incidence of hydrocephalus in traumatic brain injury: A nationwide population-based cohort study //Medicine. – 2019. – Vol. 98. – No. 42.
Coster W. J., Haley S., Baryza M. J. Functional performance of young children after traumatic brain injury: a 6-month follow-up study //American Journal of Occupational Therapy. – 1994. – Vol. 48. – No. 3. – P. 211-218.
Aguilar J. M. et al. Long term effects of early childhood traumatic brain injury on narrative discourse gist and psychosocial functioning //Disability and rehabilitation. – 2020. – Vol. 42. – No. 17. – P. 2383-2392.
Arunkumar S. et al. Is intracranial pressure monitoring useful in children with severe traumatic brain injury? //Neurology India. – 2016. – Vol. 64. – No. 5. – P. 958.
Alali A. S. et al. Intracranial pressure monitoring among children with severe traumatic brain injury //Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. – 2015. – Vol. 16. – No. 5. – P. 523-532.
Velle F. et al. Temporal effects of barbiturate coma on intracranial pressure and compensatory reserve in children with traumatic brain injury //Acta Neurochirurgica. – 2021. – Vol. 163. – No. 2. – P. 489-498.
Adelson P. D. et al. Guidelines for the acute medical management of severe traumatic brain injury in infants, children, and adolescents. Chapter 12. Use of hyperventilation in the acute management of severe pediatric traumatic brain injury //Pediatric critical care medicine: a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. – 2003. – Vol. 4. – No. 3 Suppl. – P. S45-8.
Agbeko R. S. et al. Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure responses to head elevation changes in pediatric traumatic brain injury // Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. – 2012. – Vol. 13. – No. 1. – P. e39-e47.
Lang S. S. et al. Head of bed elevation in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury // Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. – 2020. – Vol. 26. – No. 5. – P. 465-475.
Malakouti A. et al. Nutrition support and deficiencies in children with severe traumatic brain injury // Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. – 2012. – Vol. 13. – No. 1. – P. e18-e24.
Mtaweh H. et al. Energy expenditure in children after severe traumatic brain injury // Pediatric critical care medicine: a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. – 2014. – Vol. 15. – No. 3. – P. 242.
Heschl S. et al. Efficacy of pre-hospital rapid sequence intubation in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a 9-year observational study // Injury. – 2018. – Vol. 49. – No. 5. – P. 916-920.
Thakker J. C. et al. Survival and functional outcome of children requiring endotracheal intubation during therapy for severe traumatic brain injury // Critical care medicine. – 1997. – Vol. 25. – No. 8. – P. 1396-1401.
Sheehan B. M. et al. Early tracheostomy for severe pediatric traumatic brain injury is associated with reduced intensive care unit length of stay and total ventilator days // Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. – 2020. – Vol. 35. – No. 11. – P. 1346-1351.
Balakrishnan B. et al. Enteral nutrition initiation in children admitted to pediatric intensive care units after traumatic brain injury // Neurocritical Care. – 2019. – Vol. 30. – No. 1. – P. 193-200.
Chowdhury et al Nutrition in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care Vol. 11 No. 3/2024
Wallinga M.M., Newkirk M., Gardner M.T. et al. Variation in metabolic demand following severe pediatric traumatic brain injury: A case review // Nutr. Clin. Pract. — 2023. — P. 1–8.
100. Tan M., Zhu J. C., Yin H. H. Enteral nutrition in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: reasons for intolerance and medical management // British journal of neurosurgery. – 2011. – Vol. 25. – No. 1. – P. 2-8.
101. Morgan A. et al. Incidence, characteristics, and predictive factors for dysphagia after pediatric traumatic brain injury // The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. – 2003. – Vol. 18. – No. 3. – P. 239-251.
102. Hendricks K. M. et al. Malnutrition in hospitalized pediatric patients: current prevalence // Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine. – 1995. – Vol. 149. – No. 10. – P. 1118-1122.
103. Hardy C. M. et al. Pitfalls in predicting resting energy requirements in critically ill children: a comparison of predictive methods to indirect calorimetry // Nutrition in clinical practice. – 2002. – Vol. 17. – No. 3. – P. 182-189.
104. Arango J. I. et al. Posttraumatic seizures in children with severe traumatic brain injury // Child's nervous system. – 2012. – Vol. 28. – No. 11. – P. 1925-1929.
105. Kim W. H. et al. Is routine repeated head CT necessary for all pediatric traumatic brain injury? // Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society. – 2015. – Vol. 58. – No. 2. – P. 125.
106.Scott Erickson and Elizabeth Y. Killien and Mark S. Wainwright and Brianna Mills and Monica S. Vavilala.Mean Arterial Pressure and Discharge Outcomes in Severe Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury// journalNeurocritical Care, 2020, v34, p.1017-1025},
107. Brown J. B. et al. The value of the injury severity score in pediatric trauma: time for a new definition of severe injury? // The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. – 2017. – Vol. 82. – No. 6. – P. 995.
108. da Silva P. S. L., Reis M. E., Aguiar V. E. Value of repeat cranial computed tomography in pediatric patients sustaining moderate to severe traumatic brain injury // Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. – 2008. – Vol. 65. – No. 6. – P. 1293-1297.
109. Aziz H. et al. Mild and moderate pediatric traumatic brain injury: replace routine repeat head computed tomography with neurologic examination // Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. – 2013. – Vol. 75. – No. 4. – P. 550-554.
110. Madikians A., Giza C. C. Treatment of traumatic brain injury in pediatrics // Current treatment options in neurology. – 2009. – Vol. 11. – No. 6. – P. 393-404.
111. Swaminathan A., Levy P., Legome E. Evaluation and management of moderate to severe pediatric head trauma // The Journal of emergency medicine. – 2009. – Vol. 37. – No. 1. – P. 63-68.
112. Lewis P. M. et al. Cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in children with traumatic brain injury // Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. – 2015. – Vol. 16. – No. 8. – P. 739-749.
113. Friess S. H., Kilbaugh T. J., Huh J. W. Advanced neuromonitoring and imaging in pediatric traumatic brain injury // Critical care research and practice. – 2012. – Vol. 2012.
114. Agbeko R. S. et al. Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure responses to head elevation changes in pediatric traumatic brain injury // Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. – 2012. – Vol. 13. – No. 1. – P. e39-e47.
115. Coley B. D. et al. Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) in children with blunt abdominal trauma // Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. – 2000. – Vol. 48. – No. 5. – P. 902-906.
116. Alderson P., Roberts I. Corticosteroids in acute traumatic brain injury: systematic review of randomised controlled trials // BMJ. – 1997. – Vol. 314. – No. 7098. – P. 1855.
117.Jamal A, Sankhyan N, Jayashree M, Singhi S, Singhi P. Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score and the Glasgow Coma Scale in prediction of pediatric coma. World J Emerg Med. 2017;8(1):55-60. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.01.010. PMID: 28123622; PMCID: PMC5263038.
Treatment of traumatic brain injury in pediatrics // Current treatment options in neurology. – 2009. – Vol. 11. – No. 6. – P. 393-404.
Lui Austin , Kumar Kevin K. , Grant Gerald A.Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Pediatric Patients//OURNAL=Frontiers in Toxicology,V4, 2022, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/toxicology/articles/10.3389/ftox.2022.910972
Swaminathan A., Levy P., Legome E. Evaluation and management of moderate to severe pediatric head trauma // The Journal of emergency medicine. – 2009. – Vol. 37. – No. 1. – P. 63-68.
Kinoshita, K. Traumatic brain injury: pathophysiology for neurocritical care. j intensive care 4, 29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-016-0138-3
Lewis P. M. et al. Cerebrovascular pressure reactivity in children with traumatic brain injury // Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. – 2015. – Vol. 16. – No. 8. – P. 739-749.
Velle F. et al. Temporal effects of barbiturate coma on intracranial pressure and compensatory reserve in children with traumatic brain injury //Acta Neurochirurgica. – 2021. – Vol. 163. – No. 2. – P. 489-498.
Guidelines for Antibiotic Prescription in Intensive Care Unit 1 GC Khilnani, 2 Kapil Zirpe, 3 Vijay Hadda, 4 Yatin Mehta, 5 Karan Madan, 6 Atul Kulkarni, 7 Anant Mohan, 8 Subhal Dixit, 9 Randeep Guleria, 10Pradeep Bhattacharya, *For the Expert Committee to formulate National Guidelines for Antibiotic Prescription in ICU
Alexandropoulos P., Georgiou S., Chantziara V. et al. Intrathecal administration of colistin, vancomycin, and amikacin in central nervous system infections in neurosurgical ICU patients. Crit Care 19, P122 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/cc14202
Malakouti A. et al. Nutrition support and deficiencies in children with severe traumatic brain injury // Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. – 2012. – Vol. 13. – No. 1. – P. e18-e24.
Badjatia N., Vespa P. Monitoring nutrition and glucose in acute brain injury // Neurocritical care. – 2014. – Vol. 21. – No. 2. – P. 159-167.
Balakrishnan B. et al. Enteral nutrition initiation in children admitted to pediatric intensive care units after traumatic brain injury // Neurocritical Care. – 2019. – Vol. 30. – No. 1. – P. 193-200.
Tan M., Zhu J. C., Yin H. H. Enteral nutrition in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: reasons for intolerance and medical management // British journal of neurosurgery. – 2011. – Vol. 25. – No. 1. – P. 2-8.
Morgan A. et al. Incidence, characteristics, and predictive factors for dysphagia after pediatric traumatic brain injury // The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation. – 2003. – Vol. 18. – No. 3. – P. 239-251.
Lang S. S. et al. Head of bed elevation in pediatric patients with severe traumatic brain injury // Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. – 2020. – Vol. 26. – No. 5. – P. 465-475.
Malakouti A. et al. Nutrition support and deficiencies in children with severe traumatic brain injury // Pediatric Critical Care Medicine. – 2012. – Vol. 13. – No. 1. – P. e18-e24.
Mtaweh H. et al. Energy expenditure in children after severe traumatic brain injury // Pediatric critical care medicine: a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies. – 2014. – Vol. 15. – No. 3. – P. 242.
Heschl S. et al. Efficacy of pre-hospital rapid sequence intubation in paediatric traumatic brain injury: a 9-year observational study // Injury. – 2018. – Vol. 49. – No. 5. – P. 916-920.
Thakker J. C. et al. Survival and functional outcome of children requiring endotracheal intubation during therapy for severe traumatic brain injury // Critical care medicine. – 1997. – Vol. 25. – No. 8. – P. 1396-1401.
Sheehan B. M. et al. Early tracheostomy for severe pediatric traumatic brain injury is associated with reduced intensive care unit length of stay and total ventilator days // Journal of Intensive Care Medicine. – 2020. – Vol. 35. – No. 11. – P. 1346-1351.
Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery / W. Dale [et al.] // Am. J. Health-Syst. Pharm. 2013. Vol. 70. P. 195–283. [http://www.idsociety.org/ uploadedFiles/IDSA/Guidelines-Patient_Care/PDF_Library/2013%20Surgical% 20Prophylaxis%20ASHP,%20IDSA,%20SHEA,%20SIS(1)
Balakrishnan B. et al. Enteral nutrition initiation in children admitted to pediatric intensive care units after traumatic brain injury // Neurocritical Care. – 2019. – Vol. 30. – No. 1. – P. 193-200.
Sumit Roy Chowdhury, Sumit-Sahu Priyanka, Bindra Ashish. Management_in_Pediatric_Traumatic_Brain_Injury_An_Exploration_of_Knowledge_Gaps_and_Challenges. //Journal of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, VL - 11,2024/12/05,DO - 10.1055/s-0044-1795103
Hardy C. M. et al. Pitfalls in predicting resting energy requirements in critically ill children: a comparison of predictive methods to indirect calorimetry // Nutrition in clinical practice. – 2002. – Vol. 17. – No. 3. – P. 182-189.
Brown J. B. et al. The value of the injury severity score in pediatric trauma: time for a new definition of severe injury? // The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. – 2017. – Vol. 82. – No. 6. – P. 995.
Mrkobrada S., Gnanakumar V. The correlation of dystonia severity and serum transaminases in a child with a brain injury // Pediatric neurology. – 2014. – Vol. 51. – No. 4. – P. 573-575.
Farhat A. et al. Routine neuroimaging: understanding brain injury in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation // Critical care medicine. – 2021. – Vol. 50. – No. 3. – P. 480-490.
Quayle K. S. et al. Diagnostic testing for acute head injury in children: when are head computed tomography and skull radiographs indicated? // Pediatrics. – 1997. – Vol. 99. – No. 5. – P. e11-e11.
Jakob H. et al. Pediatric polytrauma management // European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. – 2010. – Vol. 36. – No. 4. – P. 325-338.
Krylov V. V. Surgery of severe traumatic brain injury. Edited by V. V. Krylov, A. E. Talypov, O. V. Levchenko. Moscow, 2019. 647 p.
Zeiler F. A. et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and microdialysis cytokines in severe traumatic brain injury: a scoping systematic review // Frontiers in neurology. – 2017. – Vol. 8. – P. 331.
Zavadenko N. N. et al. Cognitive and paroxysmal disorders in the long-term period of traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents // S. S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. – 2019. – Vol. 119. – No. 1. – P. 110-117.
Figaji A. A., Fieggen A. G., Peter J. C. Early decompressive craniotomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury // Child's Nervous System. – 2003. – Vol. 19. – No. 9. – P. 666-673.
Lovett ME, O'Brien NF, Leonard JR. Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Intracranial Pressure, Cerebral Perfusion Pressure, What Does it Mean? A Review of the Literature. Pediatr Neurol. 2019 May; 94: 3-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2018.12.003. Epub 2019 Jan 11. PMID: 30765136.
Welch T. P. et al. Fentanyl and midazolam are ineffective in reducing episodic intracranial hypertension in severe pediatric traumatic brain injury // Critical care medicine. – 2016. – Vol. 44. – No. 4. – P. 809.
Bao Y, Qiu B, Zeng H, Mo Y, Zhang N, Qi S. [Combined intravenous and intrathecal vancomycin in treatment of patients with intracranial infections after craniotomy]. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2016 Feb;28(2):169-72. Chinese. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.02.016. PMID: 26911951.
Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2:81.
Holmes JF, Palchak MJ, MacFarlane T, Kuppermann N. Performance of the pediatric Glasgow coma scale in children with blunt head trauma. Acad Emerg Med 2005; 12:814.
Drew R. J. et al. Antimicrobial treatment options for neurosurgical ventricular shunt infections in children from 1993 to 2012: a systematic review // Child's Nervous System. – 2014. – Vol. 30. – No. 5. – P. 841-850.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Semyonova Zhanna Borisovna, MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotrauma at the Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Professor at the Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery of RMACPE, Chief freelance pediatric neurosurgeon of the Moscow Healthcare Department and the Central Federal District of the Russian Ministry of Health
Melnikov Andrey Viktorovich, PhD, Leading Researcher at the Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotrauma at the Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Meshcheryakov Semyon Vladimirovich, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher, Department of Neurosurgery and Neurotrauma, Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology, Moscow Healthcare Department
Akhadov Tolibdzhon Abdullaevich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology, Moscow Healthcare Department, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation.
Savvina Irina Aleksandrovna, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Chief Researcher, Head of the Neurosurgical Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Department No. 12, Almazov National Medical Research Centre of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor at the V.L. Vanevsky Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology, North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov of the Russian Ministry of Health
Lekmanov Andrey Ustinovich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Chief Researcher, Research Institute of Pediatric Surgery, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Valiullina Svetlana Albertovna, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director of the Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology of the Moscow Healthcare Department, Head of the Department of Restorative Treatment, Chief freelance pediatric rehabilitation specialist of the Moscow Healthcare Department.
Ponina Irina Vitalyevna, Pediatrician, Rehabilitation Department, Research Institute of Emergency Pediatric Surgery and Traumatology of the Moscow Healthcare Department
Gorelyshev Sergey Kirillovich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Pediatric Neurosurgery, National Medical Research Center for Neurosurgery named after Academician N.N. Burdenko of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief freelance pediatric neurosurgeon of the Russian Ministry of Health
Khachatryan Vilyam Aramovich, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Pediatric Neurosurgery Department, Almazov National Medical Research Centre of the Russian Ministry of Health
There is no conflict of interest.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
In these clinical guidelines, all data are ranked by level of reliability (evidence) depending on the quantity and quality of studies on the issue.
Table 1. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Scale for grading levels of evidence certainty (LEC) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Scale for grading grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
The methods used to formulate the recommendations were expert consensus. Cost analysis was not performed, and pharmacoeconomic publications were not analyzed.
Clinical guidelines are updated every 3 years.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
These clinical guidelines were developed taking into account the following regulatory legal documents:
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 931n dated November 15, 2012, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to the Adult Population in the Profile 'Neurosurgery'."
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 927n dated November 15, 2012, "On Approval ofതം the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Victims with Associated, Multiple, and Isolated Traumas Accompanied by Shock."
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 388n dated June 20, 2013, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Ambulance, Including Specialized Ambulance, Medical Care."
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 554 of July 24, 2000, "On Approval of the Regulation on the State Sanitary and Epidemiological Service of the Russian Federation and the Regulation on State Sanitary and Epidemiological Standardization" (Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2000, No. 31, Art. 3295; 2004, No. 8, Art. 663; No. 47, Art. 4666; 2005, No. 39, Art. 3953)
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 788n of July 31, 2020, "On Approval of the Procedure for Organizing Medical Rehabilitation for Adults" (registered by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on September 25, 2020, registration No. 60039).
Order of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 572n of September 3, 2018, "On Approval of the Professional Standard 'Medical Rehabilitation Specialist'" (registered by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on September 17, 2018, registration No. 52162).
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms
Examination algorithm for pediatric patients with mild and moderate traumatic brain injury in the emergency department setting.


Follow the pulse sequence order.
The 2DFLAIR and 2DT2 sequences are performed with a rectangular field of view.
Prescan normalization filters and distortion correction are disabled in all sequences.
Table 4
MRI protocol for traumatic brain injury on a 3.0 T scanner.

Follow the pulse sequence order.
The 2DFLAIR and 2DT2 sequences are performed with a rectangular field of view.
Prescan normalization filters and distortion correction are disabled in all sequences.
Table 5.
Algorithm for basic and ICP-directed therapy in children with severe traumatic brain injury

Algorithm for decision-making and performance of decompressive craniectomy

Appendix C. Patient Information
TBI complications and TBI sequelae should be differentiated. TBI complications include pathological processes, primarily purulent-inflammatory ones. The development of complications in patients with traumatic brain injury can cause mortality, profound disability with an increased duration of treatment, and the need for repeated hospital admission. Various complications occur in 5-10% of pediatric TBI patients. Knowledge of these complications and the applied preventive and therapeutic measures help improve the prognosis and outcome of traumatic brain disease. To monitor complications, patients must remain under medical supervision until their condition is completely stabilized.
TBI sequelae are directly related to the injury itself and neuronal death at the moment of impact. The severity of sequelae directly depends on the severity of the injury. This is an evolutionarily predetermined and genetically fixed complex of processes in response to damage to the brain and its coverings. Sequelae also include persistent disruptions of the anatomical integrity of the brain, its meninges, and the bones of the cranial vault and skull base resulting from traumatic brain injury. In some cases, traumatic brain injury sequelae require surgical treatment only. Timely performed surgical intervention helps optimize the prognosis and outcome of the injury.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. Glasgow Coma Scale
Russian name: Glasgow Coma Scale
Original title (if available): Glasgow Coma Scale
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Buyukcam F. et al. Predicting the outcome in children with head trauma: comparison of FOUR score and Glasgow Coma Scale // Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal Of Trauma & Emergency Surgery. – 2012. – Vol. 18. – No. 6.
Type: rating scale
Purpose: To assess the level of consciousness
Content (template):
Eye opening | Verbal response | Motor response |
|---|---|---|
1 – none | 1 – none | 1 – none |
2 – to pain | 2 – moans or groans, no words | 2 – extension to pain |
3 – to sound | 3 – inappropriate words | 3 – flexion to pain |
4 – spontaneous | 4 – confused conversation | 4 – withdrawal to pain |
5 – oriented / appropriate conversation | 5 – localizes pain | |
6 – obeys commands |
Key (interpretation):
Scores are summed up. Possible result from 3 to 15.
15 points – alert
13-14 points – mild obtundation
11-12 points – moderate obtundation
9-10 points – stupor
7-8 points – moderate coma
4-6 points – deep coma
3 points – terminal coma
Appendix G2. Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale
Russian title: Pediatric Glasgow Coma Scale (for children under 4 years of age)
Original title (if applicable):
Source
Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974,
Morray JP et al: Coma scale for use in brain-injured children. CriticalCareMedicine 12:1018, 1984. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198412000-00002 [152, 153]
Type: rating scale
Purpose: To assess the level of consciousness
Content (template):
Eye opening | Verbal response | Motor response |
|---|---|---|
1 – none | 1 – absent | 1 – absent |
2 – to pain | 2 – inconsolable, agitated | 2 – abnormal extension to pain |
3 – to sound | 3 – inconsistent crying, moaning | 3 – abnormal flexion to pain |
4 – spontaneous | 4 – consolable with crying, incomplete interactivity | 4 – withdrawal to pain |
5 – smiles, orients to sound, follows objects, interactive | 5 – localizes pain | |
6 – obeys commands |
Key (interpretation):
Scores are summed up. Possible result from 3 to 15.
15 points – alert
13-14 points – mild obtundation
11-12 points – moderate obtundation
9-10 points – stupor
7–8 points – moderate coma
4–6 points – deep coma
3 points – terminal coma
Appendix G3. Marshall CT classification
Russian name:
Original name (if applicable): Marshall computed tomographic classification
Source (official developer website, validation study): Marshall L. F. et al. The diagnosis of head injury requires a classification based on computed axial tomography // J Neurotrauma. – 1992. – Vol. 9. – №. Suppl 1. – P. S287-S292.
Type: rating scale
Purpose: to assess injury severity and determine management strategy.
Content (template) and Key (interpretation):
I | No apparent pathology |
|---|---|
II | Diffuse injury I (cisterns present, midline shift 0-5 mm, and/or no high- or mixed-density lesions >25 cm³) |
III | Diffuse injury II (swelling) |
IV | Diffuse injury III (shift) |
V | Surgically evacuated mass lesion |
VI | Non-evacuated mass lesion >25 cm3 |
Appendix G4. CT prognostic scoring scale
Russian name: Rotterdam computed tomography score
Original name (if applicable): Rotterdam CT score
Source (official developer website, validation study): Maas AI, Hukkelhoven CW, Marshall LF, Steyerberg EW. Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery. 57 (6): 1173-82; discussion 1173-82.
Type: rating scale
Purpose: assessment of injury severity and prognosis
Content (template):
Basal cisterns: 0 – normal, 1 – compressed, 2 – absent
Midline shift: 0 – none or ≤5 mm, 1 – >5 mm
Epidural hematoma ≥25 ml: 0 – present, 1 – absent
IVH or SAH: 0 – absent, 1 – present
Key (interpretation):
Instructions: add 1 point to the calculated sum. 6-month mortality after injury
1 point: 0%
2 points: 7%
3 points: 16%
4 points: 26%
5 points: 53%
6 points: 61%
Appendix G5. R. Firsching brainstem injury classification
Russian name: R. Firsching brainstem injury classification
Original name (if applicable): Classification of Severe Head Injury Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Source (official developer website, validation study): Firsching R. et al. Classification of severe head injury based on magnetic resonance imaging // Acta Neurochir. – 2001. – Vol. 143. – №. 3. – P. 263-271.
Type: rating scale
Purpose: assessment of injury severity, prognosis
Content (template) and key (interpretation):
Level of injury | Grade |
|---|---|
Supratentorial injuries only | Grade I |
Unilateral brainstem injury at any level ± supratentorial injuries | Grade II |
Bilateral midbrain injury ± supratentorial injuries | Grade III |
Bilateral pontine injury ± injuries of the previous groups | Grade IV |
Appendix G6. Glasgow Outcome Scale
Russian name: Glasgow Outcome Scale
Original name (if applicable): Glasgow Outcome Scale
Source (official developer website, validation study): Crouchman M. et al. A practical outcome scale for paediatric head injury // Arch Dis Child. – 2001. – Vol. 84. – №. 2. – P. 120-124.
Type: rating scale
Purpose: assessment of patient outcomes
Content (template) and key (interpretation):
Outcome | Grade |
|---|---|
Dead | 1 |
Persistent vegetative state. The patient exhibits no cortical functions. | 2 |
Severe disability The patient is dependent on others for daily support due to mental or physical disabilities or a combination of both. | 3 |
Moderate disability The patient is independent in daily life. Disabilities may include various degrees of aphasia, hemiparesis, or ataxia, as well as intellectual and memory deficits or personality changes. | 4 |
Good recovery Resumption of normal activities, even though there may be minor neurological or psychological deficits. | 5 |
Appendix G7. Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended
Russian name: Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale
Original name (if applicable): Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended
Source (official developer website, validation study): Beers S. R. et al. Validity of a pediatric version of the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended // J Neurotrauma. – 2012. – Vol. 29. – №. 6. – P. 1126-1139.
Type: rating scale
Purpose: status assessment
Content (template) and key (interpretation):
Extended GOS | Grade |
|---|---|
Death on the first day | 1 |
Death within a month | 2 |
Vegetative state | 3 |
Severe neuromuscular disability | 4 |
Severe cognitive disability | 5 |
Moderate disability | 6 |
Mild disability | 7 |
Good recovery | 8 |
Complete recovery | 9 |
Note: assessment is performed within 1 month after trauma
Appendix G8. FOUR Score (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness)
Russian name: FOUR Coma Scale
Original name (if any): FOUR (Full Outline of UnResponsiveness)
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Buyukcam F. et al. Predicting the outcome in children with head trauma: comparison of FOUR score and Glasgow Coma Scale //Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi-Turkish Journal Of Trauma & Emergency Surgery. – 2012. – Vol. 18. – No. 6.
Type: rating scale
Purpose: details neurological status, identifies locked-in syndrome, assesses brainstem reflexes, assesses breathing pattern, and detects various stages of brain herniation (dislocation). The FOUR Coma Scale provides additional prognostic information in patients with low Glasgow Coma Scale scores
Content (template): The FOUR Coma Scale includes 4 parameters with a maximum score of "4" for each: eye responses (eye opening and tracking), motor responses (pain response and execution of simple commands), brainstem reflexes (pupillary, corneal, and cough), and breathing patterns (respiratory rhythm and breathing attempts in mechanically ventilated patients).
1. Eye responses (E)
Eyes open, tracks, and blinks to command 4 points
Eyes open, but does not track 3 points
Eyes closed, open to loud voice, but no tracking 2 points
Eyes closed, open to pain, but no tracking 1 point
Eyes remain closed in response to pain 0 points
2. Motor responses (M)
Obeys commands (thumbs up, fist, peace sign) 4 points
Localizes pain 3 points
Flexion response to pain 2 points
Extension posture to pain 1 point
No response to pain or generalized myoclonic status epilepticus 0 points
3. Brainstem reflexes (B)
Pupillary and corneal reflexes present 4 points
One pupil wide and fixed to light 3 points
Pupillary or corneal reflex absent 2 points
Pupillary and corneal reflexes absent 1 point
Absent pupillary, corneal, and cough reflexes 0 points
4. Breathing pattern (R)
Not intubated, regular breathing 4 points
Not intubated, Cheyne-Stokes breathing 3 points
Not intubated, irregular breathing 2 points
Responds/resists to ventilator 1 point
Fully synchronous with ventilator or apnea 0 points
Key (interpretation):
The maximum FOUR score is 16, and the minimum is 0.
16 – Clear consciousness
15 – Moderate obtundation
13-14 – Deep obtundation
9-12 – Stupor
7-8 – Coma I
1-6 – Coma II
0 – Coma III
Note: The FOUR Coma Scale was developed at the Mayo Clinic and presented by E.F. Wijdicks et al. in 2005. Numerous studies have confirmed the validity of this scale in neurointensive care settings.
Appendix G9. Injury Severity Score (ISS)
Russian name: Injury Severity Score (ISS)
Original title (if applicable):
Source (official developer website, validation publication): Brown J. B. et al. The value of the injury severity score in pediatric trauma: time for a new definition of severe injury? //The journal of trauma and acute care surgery. – 2017. – Vol. 82. – No. 6. – P. 995.
Type (underline): rating scale
Purpose: Assessment of injury severity
Content (template) and key (interpretation):
(conversion of AIS scores to ISS scores)
Mild (minor) <=8
Moderate 9-15
Severe 16-24
Critical >=25