Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: clinical guidelines

Applies toadults2024 editionC44, D04

Clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults. 2024 edition, ICD-10 codes: C44, D04. This page features an abridged version by WhiteCoat Pro and the full official text.

Receive research articles on "Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma"Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in English, with numbers, sample sizes, and conclusions. Plus updates in Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary based on the 2024 guideline text. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is a malignant tumor originating from epidermal keratinocytes or hair follicles; regional metastases occur in approximately 10–15% of patients. The guidelines cover diagnosis, staging, treatment selection based on risk of recurrence and tumor spread, and follow-up.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Take complaints and medical history: inquire about immunosuppression, prior radiation therapy and treatment for skin tumors, hereditary syndromes, sunburns, burns of other etiologies, arsenic exposure, inflammatory skin diseases, and non-healing wounds or ulcers. Level of Evidence (LoE) A, Grade of Recommendation (GoR) 1. → in the text
  2. Examine the entire skin and visible mucous membranes, including the scalp, nails, hands, feet, oral cavity, genitalia, and conjunctiva; assess regional lymph nodes. If skilled, perform dermatoscopy. For patients with suspected skin tumors, preference should be given to a specialist trained in early diagnosis and dermatoscopy. LoE A, GoR 1; lymph node assessment — LoE C, GoR 5. → in the text
  3. For a suspicious lesion, determine the need for invasive diagnostics. Incisional punch biopsy of the full skin thickness is preferred; superficial scrapings or touch preps may yield false-negative or false-positive results. LoE A, GoR 1. → in the text
  4. In the biopsy specimen, determine the histological subtype, degree of differentiation, depth and level of invasion, extension beyond subcutaneous fat, and perineurial, vascular, and lymphatic invasion. LoE C, GoR 5. → in the text
  5. Following morphological verification, perform TNM staging. Clinical examination and imaging methods are used to evaluate lymph nodes. → in the text
  6. For stages 0–II, ultrasound of regional lymph nodes is performed, and imaging without symptoms is not indicated. For stages III–IV, lymph node ultrasound, contrast-enhanced CT of the affected area, contrast-enhanced MRI of the affected area, and chest CT are performed; CT is preferred when bone involvement is suspected, and MRI for perineurial spread or soft tissue involvement. LoE C, GoR 4. → in the text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

Is a biopsy necessary when cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is suspected?

Yes. At the first stage, a full-thickness incisional punch biopsy with pathomorphological examination is preferred. A superficial scraping or imprint smear is less reliable. → in text

What surgical margin should be chosen when removing low-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC)?

For tumors less than 2 cm — 4 mm from the visible edge; for tumors 2 cm and larger — 6 mm, including the subcutaneous tissue. For high-risk areas, a 9 mm margin or intraoperative margin control may be required. → in text

When is Mohs micrographic surgery or other intraoperative margin control indicated?

It is preferred for high-risk cSCC. If such control is not possible, standard excision with the widest possible margin and routine histological assessment of resection margins is performed. → in text

How should a patient be followed up after treatment for cSCC?

Regular examinations of the entire skin and peripheral lymph nodes are necessary; the scope and frequency depend on the stage and recurrence risk. For stages III–IV, instrumental examinations are performed every 6 months for the first 3 years or more frequently as clinically indicated, while patients with eyelid cSCC are monitored by an ophthalmologist for life. → in text

What systemic therapy is used for unresectable or metastatic cSCC?

In the absence of contraindications, anti-PD-1 agents are used: nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 14 days or pembrolizumab 200 mg every 21 days intravenously. If contraindicated or in case of treatment failure, chemotherapy or anti-EGFR therapy with or without radiation therapy may be used. → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
476, revision 3 (ID 476_3)
Publication date
October 10, 2024
Age category
adults
ICD-10 codes
C44D04
Specialties
OncologyOphthalmology
Developers
All-Russian Public Organization "Association of Ophthalmologists"
Russian Society of Clinical Oncology
Association of Melanoma Specialists
All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Clinical Oncology"
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Guidelines — 476_3

Abbreviated Clinical Guidelines: Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

An abbreviated version of this guideline from WhiteCoat Pro — 387 pages: each section of the document is summarized concisely and in its own words, complete with tests and fill-in-the-blanks for self-assessment. Essential when you need not just to read a guideline, but to master it for an exam, accreditation, or clinical practice.
All abbreviated guidelines: 290
Beginning of abbreviated version — open

1.1 Definition

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is a malignant epithelial skin tumor.

  • Source: Epithelial cells (keratinocytes) of the skin epidermis and/or hair follicle epidermis.
  • Epidemiology: Ranks 2nd in frequency among all non-melanoma skin cancers (after basal cell carcinoma).
  • Metastasis: The rate of regional metastasis is 10–15%. The risk depends on the location and size of the primary lesion.

1.2 Etiology and Pathogenesis

There is no single etiologic factor.

Main risk factors:

  • Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is the most significant factor for sporadic forms:
  • Type B (wavelength 290–320 nm).
  • Type A (wavelength 320–400 nm).
  • Skin phototypes: There are 6 sensitivity types.
  • 1st and 2nd types: Highest sensitivity (high risk of sunburn).
  • 5th and 6th types: Lowest sensitivity.
  • Cumulative effect: The risk of developing cSCC increases with the duration of cumulative sun exposure up to approximately 30,000 hours, after which it plateaus.
  • Immunodeficiency (congenital or acquired):
  • Post-organ transplantation status (immunosuppressive therapy).
  • Lymphomas, chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
  • HIV infection.
  • Statistics: Transplant recipients have an 5- to 113-fold increased risk of developing cSCC compared to the general population.
  • Artificial ultraviolet radiation:
  • Including PUVA therapy.
  • Chemical and physical factors:
  • Arsenic exposure.
  • Ionizing radiation.
  • Precancerous conditions:
  • In many cases, non-melanoma skin cancers develop on the background of pre-existing precancerous lesions (e.g., actinic keratosis).

Etiology and risk factors (continued)

Development on the background of scar changes:

  • Localization: cSCC frequently develops in areas of scars or chronic non-healing wounds.
  • Frequency: It is the most common tumor arising in a prior scar/wound.
  • Prognosis: cSCC of this etiology has a worse prognosis and recurs more frequently after treatment.
  • Associated changes: Signs of keratosis are often found in skin areas adjacent to the tumor.

Precancerous conditions:

  • These include: actinic keratosis, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen's disease).
  • Risk: Without treatment, they can progress to invasive forms with metastatic potential.

Genetic aspects and mutations:

  • Mutational burden: cSCC cells exhibit a very high diversity of somatic mutations (higher than in other malignancies).
  • UV damage signature: Most mutations have characteristic substitutions: cytosine to thymine (C>T or CC>TT).
  • Hereditary syndromes: An increased risk of cSCC is associated with albinism and xeroderma pigmentosum.

Drug-induced risk:

  • Certain medications increase the risk of developing cSCC.
  • Drug classes:
  • Diuretics.
  • Calcium channel blockers.
  • Beta-blockers (cumulative relative risk 1.14–1.21).
  • Antineoplastic agents (e.g., BRAF protein kinase inhibitors).

1.3 Epidemiology

Statistics in the Russian Federation:

  • cSCC is not registered separately from other non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC).
  • Proportion: cSCC accounts for up to 15–20% of all NMSC cases.
  • Statistical data are usually presented as totals for all NMSCs.

Prevalence and incidence factors:

  • Ranking in structure: cSCC is the second most common tumor among NMSCs.
The official full text of the guideline below remains open and free. Only the condensed study version as a whole is paid: section-by-section explanations, self-assessment tests, and integration with platform materials.

List of Abbreviations

AJCC – American Joint Committee on Cancer

CTCAE – Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

ECOG – Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

RECIST – Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors

TNM – (stands for tumor, node, and metastasis) is the international classification of malignant tumor stages.

UICC – Union for International Cancer Control

IV – intravenous

ATC – Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System – an international drug classification system

AK – actinic keratosis

cSCC – cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

NOS – not otherwise specified

BT – brachytherapy

WHO – World Health Organization

CT – computed tomography

RT – radiotherapy

PT – physical therapy

MAL – methyl aminolevulinate (methyl aminolevulinic acid)

mAb – monoclonal antibodies (ATC code: L01XC)

ICD-10 – International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision

MRI – magnetic resonance imaging

NMSC – non-melanoma skin cancers

PET/CT – positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography

SFD – single focal dose

TFD – total focal dose

US – ultrasound examination

PDT – photodynamic therapy

ECS – extracapsular spread

** – vital and essential drugs

# – drug used off-label (not in accordance with the indications, contraindications, routes of administration, or dosages specified in the drug's package insert)

Terms and Definitions

Brachytherapy (BT) - contact irradiation of the tumor

Second stage of rehabilitation – inpatient rehabilitation in medical organizations (rehabilitation centers, rehabilitation departments) during the early recovery period of the disease, the late rehabilitation period, and the period of residual disease symptoms.

Incisional punch biopsy – a method of obtaining a full-thickness skin tissue sample, where the lateral resection margins may contain elements of the tumor (or nevus). Performed using a special punch needle (1 to 5 mm in diameter). One of the preferred methods (along with excisional biopsy) for establishing the diagnosis of cSCC.

Intraoperative morphological control of all resection margins (peripheral and deep) – a variant of urgent intraoperative frozen-section pathological examination of surgical specimens during surgical interventions for skin tumors. It differs from the standard method in the ways of cutting, marking, and preparing specimens to evaluate the resection margins (see also Table 19). Intraoperative control of all peripheral and deep resection margins is generally performed on fresh-frozen cryostat sections, achieving a visual assessment of up to 99% of the resection margin area. This method contrasts with the standard 'bread-loafing' histological examination technique, in which less than 1% of the removed tissue surface is evaluated.

Curettage – a medical procedure in which a special instrument (curette or medical spoon) is used to clean out (scrape) the tumor from the skin surface.

Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) -a non-invasive, informative, and sensitive method that allows for in vivo 'optical biomicrometry' of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid, including the palpebral commissure.

Tumor surface imprint - a methodological technique for obtaining material for cytological examination.

First stage of rehabilitation – rehabilitation during the period of specialized treatment for the primary disease (including surgical treatment / chemotherapy / radiation therapy) in departments of medical organizations specialized in the primary disease.

Planar (shave) resection of skin neoplasms – a method for removing exophytic and flat skin neoplasms in the plane of the skin using a razor blade or scalpel. In cases of suspected cutaneous melanoma, it is a suboptimal diagnostic method because it does not reliably determine the thickness of the neoplasm and thus prevents correct staging of the disease.

Prehabilitation – rehabilitation from the moment of diagnosis until the start of treatment (surgery/chemotherapy/radiation therapy).

Radiological response evaluation - evaluation of treatment response using the results of radiological examinations (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, radiography, etc.) compared with the results of previous radiological examinations in accordance with one or more response evaluation systems (such as RECIST or WHO)

Resectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and/or resectable metastases of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma – cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma or its metastases (typically regional lymph node metastases) that can be subjected to radical R0 surgical resection. Resectability assessment can be influenced by factors such as the volume (number and size) of metastatic lymph node involvement, relationship with major vessels, and underlying tissues (e.g., bone). The assessment of process resectability is highly subjective and may vary from institution to institution and from surgeon to surgeon.

Third stage of rehabilitation – rehabilitation during the early and late rehabilitation periods, and the period of residual disease symptoms in departments (offices) of rehabilitation, physiotherapy, exercise therapy, reflexology, manual therapy, psychotherapy, medical psychology, and speech therapy (defectology offices) providing outpatient medical care, in day hospitals, as well as by mobile home-visiting teams (including in sanatorium-resort organizations).

Ocular ultrasound – scanning using ultrasound waves. Ultrasound is a non-invasive, contact instrumental method used in the diagnosis of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid, including the palpebral commissure, and in assessing its treatment efficacy.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) – a method of treating oncological diseases, certain skin conditions, or infectious diseases based on the use of light-sensitive substances—photosensitizers—and light of a specific wavelength. The sensitizer is administered into the body, most often intravenously, but can also be applied topically. PDT substances have the property of selectively accumulating in the tumor or other target tissues (cells). The pathologically affected tissues are then irradiated with light of a wavelength corresponding to or close to the maximum absorption of the dye.

Excisional biopsy of a skin neoplasm – a method of obtaining a skin tissue sample in which the neoplasm is removed totally (completely) with a small (1–3 mm) margin of surrounding healthy tissue. This method of obtaining morphological material is preferred when cutaneous melanoma is suspected.

Epiluminescence microscopy (dermatoscopy) – a non-invasive skin examination technique (viewing the skin under magnification) using a dermatoscope, which typically consists of a magnifier (×10), a non-polarized light source, a transparent plate, and a liquid medium between the instrument and the skin. Modern dermatoscopes may use a liquid medium or instead apply polarized light to compensate for skin surface reflections. When the obtained images or video clips are digitally recorded or processed, the device may be called a digital epiluminescence dermatoscope.

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (hereinafter cSCC) is a malignant skin tumor originating from epithelial cells (keratinocytes) of the skin epidermis and/or the epidermis of hair follicles. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is the second most common tumor after basal cell carcinoma among all non-melanoma skin cancers. The frequency of regional metastasis is 10-15% and depends on the location and size of the primary lesion [1].

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

There is no single etiological factor for the development of skin tumors. The most significant risk factor for sporadic (non-hereditary) forms of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma should be considered exposure to ultraviolet B radiation (wavelength 290–320 nm) and ultraviolet A radiation (wavelength 320–400 nm) [2]. At the same time, skin sensitivity to ultraviolet radiation varies among individuals and can be classified into 6 types, where types 1 and 2 exhibit the highest sensitivity (and, accordingly, the highest probability of sunburn), while types 5 and 6 exhibit the lowest [3]. The risk of developing cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma increases with a cumulative sun exposure duration of approximately 30,000 hours, after which it reaches a plateau [4].

Other risk factors to note include congenital or acquired immunodeficiency (e.g., following organ transplantation or in other conditions requiring immunosuppressants, lymphomas, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, HIV) [2]. Analysis of post-transplant patient registries demonstrates a 5- to 113-fold higher risk of developing cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma compared to the general population [5-15].

An association between artificial ultraviolet radiation (including PUVA therapy) and an increased risk of non-melanoma skin tumors has been described [16]. Individuals with a history of exposure to arsenic and ionizing radiation also have an increased risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma [2]. In many cases, non-melanoma skin tumors develop against the background of preexisting precancerous lesions (such as actinic keratosis), which can also frequently be detected in adjacent areas of skin near the malignant tumor [17].

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma also develops in the area of scars or non-healing wounds. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is the most frequent tumor developing on the background of a preexisting scar or a chronic non-healing wound. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma developing on the background of a scar or wound has a poorer prognosis and recurs more frequently after treatment [18-27].

Precancerous conditions, such as actinic keratosis or cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen's disease), if left untreated, may progress into invasive forms of cancer that can metastasize [28-30].

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma cells exhibit a very high diversity of somatic mutations, significantly higher than in other types of malignant tumors. Most of these mutations carry the UV damage signature (cytosine to thymine substitutions, C>T or CC>TT) [31].

There is also a number of hereditary syndromes associated with a potential risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: albinism, as well as xeroderma pigmentosum [28, 29, 32-36].

Currently, evidence is emerging that certain medications may increase the risk of developing cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Such medications include diuretics, calcium channel blockers, beta-blockers (combined relative risk 1.14–1.21), and certain antineoplastic drugs (e.g., BRAF protein kinase inhibitors) [37-39].

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

In the Russian Federation (as in many countries worldwide), squamous cell carcinoma is not recorded separately from other non-melanoma skin tumors; however, according to some data, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma accounts for up to 15–20% of all cases of non-melanoma skin tumors [40]. Therefore, statistics here and hereafter are presented for all non-melanoma skin tumors.

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is considered the second most common tumor among non-melanoma skin cancers in humans [41, 42]. The incidence varies greatly depending on latitude and is significantly higher in individuals with fair skin phototypes [2]. Consequently, the highest incidence of non-melanoma skin cancers in the world is observed in Australia, where every second resident develops non-melanoma skin cancer by the age of 70, while the lowest is in parts of Africa [2, 4, 40-42]. Patients with two or more non-melanoma skin cancers have a substantially higher risk of developing new ones, and multiple non-melanoma skin cancers are more common in men [43].

In 2022, there were 79,399 new cases of non-melanoma skin tumors diagnosed in the Russian Federation (29,686 in men and 49,713 in women). In 2022, the crude incidence rate (both sexes) was 54.12 per 100,000 population, and the age-standardized rate was 26.49 per 100,000 population (26.94 and 26.62 for women and men, respectively). In the overall morbidity structure, non-melanoma skin tumors accounted for 12.7% in 2018 (both sexes), 10.5% in men, and 14.6% in women. The average annual growth rate of crude incidence rates over 10 years was 0.37% in men and 0.37% in women. The mean age of patients at diagnosis was 69.7 years (both sexes), 68.4 years (men), and 70.5 years (women). The cumulative risk of developing non-melanoma skin tumors (period 2012–2022, age 0–74 years) was 3.03% [44, 45].

In 2022, 714 men and 792 women died from non-melanoma skin tumors in Russia; the crude mortality rate (both sexes) was 1.03 per 100,000 population, and the age-standardized mortality rate was 0.41 per 100,000 population (0.29 in women and 0.59 in men). The mean age at death was 73.7 years (both sexes), 71.1 years (men), and 70.1 years (women). In 2017, 25 cases of melanoma were registered in patients under 20 years of age [44, 45].

The proportion of patients with a morphologically verified diagnosis among all patients with a newly diagnosed malignant neoplasm in Russia in 2018 was 99.2%. In 2022, at the time of diagnosis, Stage I was established in 83.2%, Stage II in 13.6%, Stage III in 2.3%, Stage IV in 0.6%, and stage was unknown in 0.2%. Among newly diagnosed patients, the disease was detected proactively in 36.6% (compared to 45.5% in 2018). One-year mortality rate following diagnosis was 0.5% [44, 45].

At the end of 2022, there were 435,938 patients under active dispensary observation (298.9 per 100,000 population), of whom 160,090 patients (36.7%) had been under observation for 5 years or more. The patient accumulation index was 6.5, and mortality was 0.3% (compared to 0.9% in 2008). According to available reporting forms, in 2022, radical treatment was completed in 68,034 patients (86.0% of newly diagnosed cases), with 75.1% of non-melanoma skin cancer patients (among those eligible for radical treatment) receiving surgery alone, 21.3% receiving radiation therapy alone, 3.5% receiving combined or multimodality treatment (excluding chemoradiotherapy), and 0.2% receiving chemoradiotherapy. There are no data on completed cases of medical therapy (drug therapy) alone [44, 45].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

According to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (hereinafter referred to as ICD-10).

Other malignant neoplasms of skin (C44) [46]:

  • C44.0 Malignant neoplasm of skin of lip;

o Excludes: malignant neoplasm of lip (C00)

  • C44.1 Malignant neoplasm of skin of eyelid, including canthus;

o Excludes: connective tissue of eyelid (C49.0)

  • C44.2 Malignant neoplasm of skin of ear and external auditory canal;

o Excludes: connective tissue of ear (C49.0)

  • C44.3 Malignant neoplasm of skin of other and unspecified parts of face;

  • C44.4 Malignant neoplasm of skin of scalp and neck;

  • C44.5 Malignant neoplasm of skin of trunk (including perianal skin, anus and demarcation zone, breast);

o Excludes: anal canal [anus] NOS (C21.0)

  • C44.6 Malignant neoplasm of skin of upper limb, including shoulder region;

  • C44.7 Malignant neoplasm of skin of lower limb, including hip region;

  • C44.8 Malignant neoplasm of overlapping sites of skin;

  • C44.9 Malignant neoplasm of skin, unspecified;

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

1.5.1. International Histological Classification

The International Histological Classification of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Certain Keratinocytic Skin Tumors is presented below (see Table 1) [1]:

Table 1. International Histological Classification of Epidermal and Keratinocytic Tumors

Name

ICD-O-3 Code

Carcinomas

Squamous cell carcinoma, NOS

8070/3

Keratoacanthoma

8071/3*

Acantholytic squamous cell carcinoma

8075/3

Spindle cell squamous cell carcinoma

8074/3

Verrucous squamous cell carcinoma

8051/3

Adenosquamous carcinoma

8560/3

Clear cell squamous cell carcinoma

8084/3

Other (rare) variants:

Squamous cell carcinoma with sarcomatoid differentiation

8074/3

Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma

8082/3

Pseudovascular squamous cell carcinoma

8074/3

Osteoclast-like giant cell squamous cell carcinoma

8035/3

Squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen's disease)

8070/2

Merkel cell carcinoma

8274/3

Precancerous lesions and benign conditions simulating malignant skin neoplasms

Precancerous keratoses

Actinic keratosis

8070/0*

Arsenical keratosis

8070/0*

PUVA keratosis

8070/0*

Warts

Verruca vulgaris

Plantar wart

Plane wart

Benign acanthomas/keratoses

Seborrheic keratosis

8052/0

Solar lentigo

8052/0

Lichen planus-like keratosis

8052/0

Clear cell acanthoma

8084/0*

Large cell acanthoma

8072/0*

Warty dyskeratoma

8054/0*

Other benign keratoses

8052/0

* - this code was introduced for the first time in the 4th edition of the WHO classification (2018)

1.5.2. Staging

For staging of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, the current version of the AJCC/UICC TNM classification should be used, currently the 8th edition (2017) [47]

Morphological confirmation is mandatory for the staging procedure of squamous cell carcinoma. Assessment of lymph node status for staging purposes is performed using clinical examination and instrumental imaging

Skin cancer classification differs depending on the anatomical region. Currently, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is classified separately in 1) the head and neck region, 2) the eyelid skin, including the eyelid commissure, and 3) all other anatomical regions.

1.5.2.1. Skin cancer (excluding eyelid skin, including eyelid commissure, scalp and neck skin, perianal skin, vulva and penis) (C44.5 – 7, C63.2).

This classification applies only to skin cancer (excluding Merkel cell carcinoma) of the specified localizations

Assessment of primary tumor extent (cT) is performed using clinical examination; assessment of lymph node status (N) and the presence or absence of distant metastases (M) is performed using clinical examination and instrumental imaging

The T criterion reflects the extent of the primary tumor (see Table 2)

Table 2. Primary tumor staging (T)

T criterion

Classification descriptor

Tx

primary tumor cannot be assessed

T0

no evidence of primary tumor (e.g., in cases of carcinoma metastasis with an occult primary site)

Tis

carcinoma in situ

T1

Tumor 2 cm or less in greatest dimension

T2

Tumor >2 cm, but £4 cm in greatest dimension

T3

Tumor > 4 cm in greatest dimension, OR minor erosion of the underlying bone, OR perineural invasion, OR deep invasion[1]

T4

Tumor with massive invasion of the bone cortex or bone marrow, or destruction of the bones of the skull base including invasion into bone foramina and/or the spinal canal with extension into the epidural space

T4a

Tumor with massive invasion of the bone cortex or bone marrow

T4b

Tumor with invasion of the bones of the axial skeleton, including invasion into bone foramina and/or the spinal canal with extension into the epidural space

In the case of synchronous multiple primary skin lesions, the tumor should be classified with the maximum (worst) T category, and the number of individual tumors should be indicated in parentheses, e.g., T2(5).

The N criterion indicates the presence or absence of regional lymph node metastases (see Table 4)

Regional lymph nodes for tumors located predominantly on one side of the body (left or right) are considered to be:

— Head and neck: ipsilateral parotid, submandibular, cervical, and supraclavicular lymph nodes;

— Chest wall: ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes;

— Upper extremity: ipsilateral epitrochlear and axillary lymph nodes;

— Abdomen, lower back, and buttocks: ipsilateral inguinal lymph nodes;

— Lower extremity: ipsilateral popliteal and inguinal lymph nodes;

— Anal margin and perianal skin: ipsilateral inguinal lymph nodes.

If a tumor is located in border zones, lymph nodes on both sides may be considered regional. Table 3 lists anatomical landmarks for defining 4-cm-wide border zones.

Table 3. Anatomical landmarks of border zones for defining regional lymph node basins

Areas

Borderline (4 cm wide)

Left and right halves

Midline of the body

Head and neck / chest wall

Clavicle – acromion – upper edge of the shoulder

Chest wall / upper extremity

Shoulder – axilla – shoulder

Chest wall / abdomen, lower back, or buttocks

Anterior: midpoint between the umbilicus and the costal margin;

Posterior: lower border of the thoracic vertebra (transverse process)

Abdomen, lower back, or buttocks / lower extremity

Inguinal crease – greater trochanter – gluteal fold

If metastases are detected in lymph nodes outside the specified regional metastatic zones, they should be classified as distant metastases.

Table 4. Regional lymph node staging (N)

NX

regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed.

N0

no regional lymph node metastasis.

N1

metastasis in a single ipsilateral regional lymph node, 3 cm or less in greatest dimension.

N2

metastasis in a single regional lymph node more than 3 cm, but not more than 6 cm in greatest dimension, or multiple regional lymph node metastases none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension

N3

metastasis in one or more regional lymph nodes measuring more than 6 cm in greatest dimension.

The M criterion indicates the presence or absence of distant metastases (see Table 5)

Table 5. Distant metastasis staging (M)

M0

no distant metastases.

M1

presence of distant metastases[2].

Certain poor prognostic factors are summarized in Section 7 (Additional Information [including factors influencing the outcome of the disease or condition]). In the AJCC classification, the presence of such factors may upgrade the stage from I to II [7].

Stage grouping is presented in Table 6:

Table 6. Stage grouping of non-melanoma skin cancers

Stage

T

N

M

0

is

0

0

I

1

0

0

II

2

0

0

III

3

0

0

1,2,3

1

0

IVA

1,2,3

2,3

0

4

Any

0

IVB

Any

Any

1 

1.5.2.2. Skin cancer of the head and neck (excluding eyelid skin and canthus) (C44.0, C44.2 – C44.4).

The T criterion reflects the extent of the primary tumor (see Table 2) in Section 1.5.2.1.

For head and neck skin cancer, there are specific features in the staging of regional lymph nodes (see Table 7)

Table 7. Regional lymph node staging (N)

NX

regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed.

N0

no regional lymph node metastasis.

N1

metastasis in a single ipsilateral regional lymph node, 3 cm or less in greatest dimension, without extra-capsular extension

N2

Defined as:

N2a

metastasis in a single ipsilateral regional lymph node measuring more than 3 cm but not more than 6 cm in greatest dimension, without extra-capsular extension

N2b

multiple ipsilateral regional lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension, without extra-capsular extension

N2c

bilateral or contralateral neck lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension, without extra-capsular extension

N3

metastasis in one or more regional lymph nodes measuring more than 6 cm in greatest dimension without extra-capsular extension, or metastasis in one or more regional lymph nodes with clinical evidence of extra-capsular extension[3]

N3a

metastasis in one or more regional lymph nodes measuring more than 6 cm in greatest dimension without extra-capsular extension

N3b

metastasis in one or more regional lymph nodes with clinical evidence of extra-capsular extension1

The M criterion indicates the presence or absence of distant metastases (see Table 5) in Section 1.5.2.1.

Stage grouping is presented in Table 6 in Section 1.5.2.1.

1.5.2.3. Skin cancer of the eyelid, including canthus (C44.1).

Eyelid skin cancer has specific staging features for both the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes.

Morphological confirmation is mandatory. Assessment of the extent of the primary tumor (cT) and lymph node status (N) is performed via clinical examination; presence or absence of distant metastases (M) is evaluated via clinical examination and instrumental imaging studies

Regional lymph nodes for the eyelid, including the canthus, are considered to be the preauricular, submandibular, and cervical lymph nodes.

The T criterion reflects the extent of the primary tumor (see Table 8)

Table 8. Primary tumor staging (T)

T criterion

Classification descriptor

Tx

primary tumor cannot be assessed

T0

no evidence of primary tumor (e.g., in cases of carcinoma metastasis with an occult primary site)

Tis

carcinoma in situ

T1

Tumor 10 mm or less in greatest dimension and:

T1a

does not involve the tarsal plate or eyelid margin

T1b

involves the tarsal plate or eyelid margin

T1c

Infiltrates the full thickness of the eyelid

T2

Tumor greater than 10 mm, but £20 mm or less in greatest dimension and:

T2a

does not involve the tarsal plate or eyelid margin

T2b

involves the tarsal plate or eyelid margin

T2c

infiltrates the full thickness of the eyelid

T3

Tumor greater than 20 mm, but £30 mm or less in greatest dimension and:

T3a

does not involve the tarsal plate or eyelid margin

T3b

involves the tarsal plate or eyelid margin

T3c

infiltrates the full thickness of the eyelid

T4

any eyelid tumor that involves adjacent structures of the eye, orbit, or face

T4a

tumor involves ocular or intraorbital structures

T4b

tumor involves (or destroys) the bony orbital walls, extends to the paranasal sinuses, or involves the lacrimal sac/nasolacrimal duct or brain

The N criterion indicates the presence or absence of regional lymph node metastases (see Table 9)

Table 9. Regional lymph node staging (N)

NX

regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed.

N0

no regional lymph node metastasis.

N1

metastasis in a single ipsilateral regional lymph node, 3 cm or less in greatest dimension

N2

metastasis in a single ipsilateral regional lymph node measuring more than 3 cm in greatest dimension OR bilateral lymph node involvement OR metastases in contralateral lymph nodes.

The M criterion indicates the presence or absence of distant metastases (see Table 5) in Section 1.5.2.1.

Stage grouping is presented in Table 10:

Table 10. Stage grouping of non-melanoma tumors of the eyelid skin, including the canthus

Stage

T

N

M

0

is

0

0

IA

1

0

0

IB

2a

0

0

IIA

2b, 2c, 3

0

0

IIB

4

0

0

IIIA

Any T

1

0

IIIB

Any T

2

0

IV

Any T

Any N

1

1.5.3. Classification according to recurrence risk factors [48]

From a practical standpoint, squamous cell carcinoma should be classified according to recurrence risk (see Table 11). In this case, tumor location (see Table 12), clinical features, and morphological features are taken into account (see Table 11). Therefore, performing a biopsy with subsequent pathomorphological examination when planning destructive treatment methods is extremely important.

Table 11. Clinical and morphological risk factors for squamous cell carcinoma recurrence [48, 49]

Sign

Low risk

High risk

Clinical features:

Location (see Table 12 for definitions) and size

Zone L: size < 20 mm

Zone M: size < 10 mm

Zone L: size ³ 20 mm

Zone M: size ³ 10 mm

Zone H: any size

Tumor margins

Well-defined

Poorly defined / infiltrative

Primary tumor or recurrence

Primary tumor

Recurrence

Immunosuppression

No

Present

Prior radiotherapy

None

Tumor within a previously irradiated field

Site of scar / chronic ulcer / chronic inflammation

No

Yes

Rapid tumor growth

No

Yes

Neurological symptoms[4]

No

Yes

Morphological features:

Differentiation grade

High- or moderately differentiated tumor

Poorly differentiated tumor

Morphological subtypes

Other types

Acantholytic (adenoid), adenosquamous (mucin-producing), desmoplastic, metaplastic (carcinosarcomatous) type

Depth (thickness or level) of invasion

≤ 6 mm and no invasion beyond the subcutaneous tissue

>6 mm or invasion beyond the subcutaneous tissue

Perineural, lymphatic, or vascular invasion

No

present

Risk-based localization groups for recurrence are listed in Table 12.

Table 12. Risk of squamous cell carcinoma recurrence depending on the primary tumor site[48, 50]

Low risk

(Zone L)

Intermediate risk

(Zone M)

High risk

(Zone H)

Trunk and extremities (excluding palms, nail units, anterior lower legs, ankles, feet)

Cheeks, forehead, scalp, neck, and lower legs

"Facial mask zone" (central face, eyelids, eyebrows, periorbital areas, nose, lips [skin and vermilion border], chin, mandible, parotid and postauricular area, facial skin folds, temple, auricle), as well as genitalia, palms, and soles.

Squamous cell carcinoma arising on the genitalia, mucous membranes, and auricle is also associated with a higher risk of metastasis [19, 50]

[1] Deep invasion is defined as invasion beyond the subcutaneous fat OR greater than 6 mm (measured from the granular layer of the adjacent normal epidermis to the base of the tumor); perineural invasion (for T3 staging) is defined as clinical or radiologic involvement of named nerves, BUT without invasion or extension through skull base foramina

[2] Note: contralateral lymph node metastases from primary tumors located outside the head and neck should be considered distant metastases

[3] Clinical signs of extracapsular extension include skin or soft tissue involvement, fixation or firm attachment to underlying muscle or other adjacent structures, as well as clinical signs of nerve involvement

[4] Pain, burning, decreased sensation, paresthesia, facial nerve palsy, diplopia, blurred vision, etc. are symptoms that may occur when a motor or sensory nerve is involved in the tumor process.

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma most commonly develops on areas of skin exposed to chronic ultraviolet radiation: the head, neck, dorsal hands, and forearms. Clinical signs of photodamage include atrophy, telangiectasias, solar lentigines, and seborrheic keratosis. cSCC develops more frequently in men than in women. Patients with skin phototypes 1 and 2 are at risk for developing cSCC[51].

cSCC more frequently develops from precursor or background conditions, which include actinic keratosis, chronic infections such as osteomyelitis, chronic inflammation, burns (Marjolin's ulcer), human papillomavirus infection, and rarely cSCC develops de novo [52].

One of the frequent precursors is actinic keratosis (AK), which clinically can be presented by 3 grades. Grade 1 AK is an irregular erythematous macule with a smooth surface, often multiple. Over time, the macule becomes more demarcated, thin whitish scales appear on its surface, and the lesion becomes palpable. This clinical picture corresponds to Grade 2 AK. As the surface scales accumulate and acquire a yellowish tint, Grade 3 AK is diagnosed. An increase in the number of scales on the surface of AK leads to the formation of a cutaneous horn. In such advanced stages, it is impossible to distinguish actinic keratosis from an invasive form of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) without pathomorphological data. A specific variant of AK is actinic cheilitis, involving the vermilion border of the lower lip, characterized by a well-demarcated area with surface scales and crusts[53, 54].

Non-invasive forms of cSCC include Bowen's disease and erythroplasia of Queyrat. Bowen's disease is characterized by a solitary, irregular psoriasiform plaque with clear margins and tightly adherent dry scales on the surface. It is typically unresponsive to topical anti-inflammatory therapy. Whitish-yellow scales unevenly cover the surface of the neoplasm. Without treatment, the lesion continues to slowly increase in size and over many years evolves into an invasive form of cSCC. Bowen's disease may present with pigmentation. Erythroplasia of Queyrat is a non-invasive form of cSCC localized on the integumentary tissues of the penis, clinically manifesting as a red plaque with distinct borders and a moist, shiny surface when lesions are localized on the integumentary tissues of the penis.

According to the WHO 2018 classification, keratatoacanthoma is a highly differentiated form of cSCC. Clinically, this form presents as a single dark red nodule measuring 2.0 cm or more, with a specific central crateriform depression filled with keratin masses. Keratoacanthoma may undergo spontaneous resolution. [49, 54]

Early manifestations of invasive cSCC may resemble the clinical picture of the hypertrophic form of AK (Grade 3) and may present as a red plaque with yellow-white scales. Without treatment, the lesion becomes large and elevated, forming a firm, dark-red nodule with a necrotic crust in the center. [55]

cSCC arising de novo manifests as a solitary dark-red nodule with a multi-layered crust in the center. Forceful removal of the crusts leads to the formation of an ulcer filled with foul-smelling necrotic masses. The resulting ulcer can lead to the destruction of underlying anatomical structures.[56]

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

Criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition:

1) patient complaints and medical history;

2) physical examination (clinical inspection) data and, in some cases, dermatoscopy;

3) vital pathomorphological examination data of biopsy or surgical material, or, in some cases, cytological examination of tumor material.

Table 13 presents the diagnostic workup plan according to the clinical stage of cSCC. Recommendations for the implementation of specific medical interventions are provided in the relevant sections.

Table 13. Diagnostic workup plan according to the clinical stage of the disease

Clinically established disease stage

Physical examination (+/- dermatoscopy)

Instrumental diagnostics

0, I, II

Yes

· Ultrasound of regional lymph nodes

· Diagnostic imaging is not recommended in the absence of symptoms

III and IV

Yes

· Ultrasound of regional lymph nodes

· Contrast-enhanced CT and contrast-enhanced MRI of the affected anatomical region

· Chest CT

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

It is recommended to collect complaints and medical history from patients at their initial presentation with suspected malignant skin tumors in order to identify factors that may influence the choice of treatment strategy, diagnostic methods, and secondary prevention [57-64].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)

Comments: The patient should be actively questioned and the presence of the following risk factors for disease onset and recurrence should be documented in the medical records: 1) presence or absence of immunosuppression; 2) prior radiation therapy; 3) previous treatment for skin neoplasms; 4) presence of hereditary diseases or syndromes; 5) number of sunburns; 6) history of thermal/chemical/radiation burns; 7) contact with occupational hazards, such as arsenic; 8) treatment for inflammatory skin diseases, e.g., psoriasis; 9) presence or absence of long-term non-healing wounds or ulcers.

2.2 Physical Examination

It is recommended that upon the patient's initial presentation with complaints of a skin neoplasm, the examination area should be expanded to assess the state of the entire skin and visible mucous membranes, including the scalp, nail plates, skin of the feet and hands, oral mucosa, genitalia, and conjunctiva, in order to detect other suspicious skin neoplasms [64, 65].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1)

Comment: there is significant variation and uncertainty regarding the diagnostic accuracy of visual inspection; the error rate of visual inspection is quite high. Therefore, other diagnostic methods must also be used to ensure accurate diagnosis of malignant skin neoplasms. It should also be noted that multiple primary synchronous tumors (melanomas and non-melanoma skin cancers) can be detected in 5-10% of patients [66-68].

It is recommended that the examination of a patient presenting with a skin neoplasm be performed by physicians skilled in the early diagnosis of malignant skin neoplasms (including dermatoscopy skills) to assess the entire skin and lymph nodes and to identify suspicious lesions [64, 69].

GOM ALOE 1Level of Evidence – A (Level of Data Reliability – 1)

It is recommended to perform epiluminescence microscopy (dermatoscopy) of the skin, nail plates, and accessible mucous membranes during the examination of patients with complaints of pigmented skin neoplasms, as it increases the accuracy of non-invasive diagnostics and reduces the need for biopsy; however, it should only be performed by specialists trained in this method [64, 70, 71].

GOR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation — A (Level of Evidence — 1)

Comment: dermoscopic features specific to Bowen's disease include dotted or glomerular vessels, often arranged linearly, and yellow structureless areas; the pigmented form of Bowen's disease is characterized by brown structureless areas, brown dots and globules arranged linearly; features characteristic of the invasive form of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), including keratoacanthoma, are: hairpin-like vessels at the periphery of the lesion, centrally located yellow structureless areas, polymorphic vessels, targetoid structures (or keratin follicular plugs), white lines, and in pigmented forms of cSCC – grey-brown dots and globules [70, 72–75].

It is recommended to include an assessment of regional lymph node status in the examination of patients with suspected malignant skin neoplasms to rule out regional lymph node metastasis [48, 64].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: it should be noted that physical examination of lymph nodes does not rule out the need for ultrasound examination of lymph nodes in patients with a confirmed diagnosis, as physical examination alone lacks sufficient accuracy.

It is recommended to decide on the feasibility of invasive diagnostics (biopsy) of the neoplasm for morphological verification of the diagnosis based on the analysis of complaints, anamnesis, and physical examination data during the appointment [76].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation — A (Level of Evidence — 1)

Comment: full-thickness skin biopsy and subsequent histopathological examination of the biopsy material should always be preferred, as cytological examination of scrapings or imprint smears can yield both false-negative and false-positive results [76].

It is recommended that if cSCC of the eyelids, including the palpebral commissure, is detected or suspected, a consultation (in-person or via telemedicine) with an oncology department of an ophthalmology clinic be arranged [77–82].

GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended that patients with suspected xeroderma pigmentosum be referred for medical genetic counseling [59, 83–92].

GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

  • Prior to morphological confirmation of the diagnosis, laboratory diagnostics is not recommended unless intercurrent pathology or the patient's general condition necessitates it for the safe performance of a biopsy [48].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

In the absence of symptoms, taking into account the frequency of regional and distant metastasis of cSCC, it is recommended to perform diagnostic examinations of varying scope depending on the stage of the disease (established by clinical examination and histological report) to detect occult metastases. When planning local treatment, it is important to perform the most complete preoperative staging possible if perineural invasion, involvement of underlying soft tissues or other structures, or bone involvement is suspected.

It is recommended, in the presence of appropriate indications (symptoms of metastasis or locally destructive growth, signs of bone involvement, perineural spread, or involvement of underlying soft tissues), to carry out instrumental diagnostic procedures (including diagnostic imaging) in full to timely determine the extent of primary squamous cell carcinoma and detect metastatic disease [48, 93–101] (for details, see Table 13).

Level of Recommendations – CLevel of Evidence – 4Level of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: in the presence of clinical signs of involvement of structures such as bone, it is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced computed tomography (in the absence of contraindications) of the anatomical region involved in the tumor process. When perineural invasion or soft tissue involvement is suspected, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging should be preferred (in the absence of contraindications) [48, 93–101].

It is not recommended to perform instrumental diagnostics prior to morphological confirmation of the diagnosis unless intercurrent pathology or the patient's general condition necessitates it for the safe performance of a biopsy [48].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment: the treatment and examination plan should not be formulated prior to obtaining histological (or, in some cases, cytological) examination results.

It is recommended to perform ultrasound/CT-guided biopsy of metastases when CT or MRI findings raise suspicion of metastases, in cases where their confirmation fundamentally alters treatment tactics for the purpose of morphological verification of the metastatic process [17, 48].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended, in patients with primary lesions localized on the eyelid skin, to supplement the scope of instrumental examinations with ocular ultrasound biomicroscopy and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) with an ophthalmological examination to assess the structure of eyelid cSCC, including the palpebral commissure in the pre- and postoperative periods [102].

GCR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendations — B (Level of Evidence — 3).

2.5 Other Procedures

It is recommended that all patients with a clinical suspicion of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma undergo morphological verification of the diagnosis as a first step to confirm the diagnosis and formulate a subsequent examination and treatment plan. For this purpose, it is preferable to use an incision (punch) biopsy of the full skin thickness compared to planar resection or scraping/imprint smear cytology, since in some forms (e.g., infiltrative) the diagnostic material may be located in the deep layers of the skin, and superficial fragments of the neoplasm may not contain tumor cells [48, 76].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)

Comments: Incisional punch biopsy can be safely performed in an outpatient setting using a specialized instrument—a punch biopsy needle—with the exception of certain anatomical areas (e.g., eyelid skin).

It is recommended that all patients with a clinical diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma or suspected squamous cell carcinoma undergo histopathological examination of the biopsy material to confirm the diagnosis. The report should ideally reflect the following characteristics to determine disease staging and prognosis [48, 76, 103].

o Histological subtype of cSCC (in accordance with the 2018 WHO classification of skin tumors [103])

o Presence or absence of any features that increase the risk of local recurrence, including, but not limited to, such characteristics as

  • degree of differentiation;

  • tumor invasion beyond the subcutaneous adipose tissue;

  • presence of perineural invasion (if a nerve in the hypodermis is involved or any nerve > 0.1 mm in diameter);

  • depth (thickness in mm or anatomical level) of invasion;

  • presence of vascular invasion;

  • presence of lymphatic invasion

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

It is recommended that histopathological examination of the surgical specimen be performed during surgical treatment in all patients with a clinical diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma or suspected squamous cell carcinoma. The report (if cSCC is detected) should reflect the following characteristics for determining disease staging and prognosis [76, 104]:

o Histological subtype of squamous cell carcinoma (in accordance with the 2018 WHO international classification of skin tumors) [103]),

o Depth of invasion, in mm

o Anatomical level of invasion

o Tumor extension beyond the subcutaneous adipose tissue;

o tumor invasion beyond the subcutaneous adipose tissue;

o presence of perineural invasion (if a nerve in the hypodermis is involved or any nerve > 0.1 mm in diameter)

o Depth (thickness in mm or anatomical level) of invasion

o Presence of vascular invasion;

o Presence of lymphatic invasion

o Status of peripheral and deep resection margins

o When obtaining specimens from surgical treatment with intraoperative control of all resection margins, the depth of invasion (in mm) cannot be reliably determined; in this case, it is permissible to indicate the anatomical level of invasion.

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

The choice of treatment tactics for patients with squamous cell carcinoma should be made individually, taking into account the extent of the tumor process, its location, prognostic factors (including biopsy data), the patient's general condition (severity of comorbid conditions), and life expectancy. The main goal of treatment for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) should be the complete removal of the tumor, while striving to maximally preserve the function of the involved organ and achieve the best cosmetic results. Surgical approaches are often the most effective and efficient ways to achieve a cure, but considerations of function preservation, cosmetic outcomes, patient preferences, and general health may lead to the choice of radiation therapy as the primary treatment to achieve an optimal overall outcome. Some patients at high risk of developing multiple primary tumors (e.g., in immunosuppression or albinism) may require careful monitoring and preventive measures.

Recommendations on the use of these methods, including dosing regimens for the specified drugs, are presented below.

3.1 Treatment of localized disease stages (I-II)

It is recommended that all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of CSCC undergo an assessment of the risk of disease recurrence and metastasis in accordance with these guidelines (see section 1.5.3) prior to choosing a treatment strategy [48, 49, 76].

GGR ALEL 2Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 2)

3.1.1 Treatment of low-risk squamous cell carcinoma

It is recommended that all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of low-risk CSCC (see section 1.5.3) undergo standard excision with a 4 mm margin from the visible tumor edge (including subcutaneous tissue) (for tumor linear dimensions less than 2 cm) or with a 6 mm margin from the visible tumor edge (including subcutaneous tissue) (for tumor linear dimensions of 2 cm or more) along with routine assessment of the resection margin during a lifelong pathomorphological examination of the surgical specimen (method of defect closure at the discretion of the surgeon) [105-117].

GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

It is recommended to use a surgical margin of at least 6 mm from the visible edge of the tumor if its size is 2 cm or more (except for high-risk zones, which may require a larger margin – 9 mm). At the same time, the zone of erythema or the rim of redness that sometimes accompanies the tumor should be regarded as an element of the tumor node [17, 48, 105-117]. See also Table 14.

GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: when performing standard surgical excision, it is recommended to mark orientation landmarks (12 o'clock) on the removed tumor and on the patient's body, which may be necessary when planning re-excision in case the tumor is found at the resection margin during routine histological examination

Table 14. Surgical tactics for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma depending on the risk of recurrence and primary tumor size [105-122].

Risk of recurrence (see section 1.5.3)

Maximum tumor size, cm

Surgical approach

Low

< 1 cm

Margin from the visible edge 4 mm

1.01 – 1.9 cm

Margin from the visible edge 4 mm

≥2.0 cm

Margin from the visible edge 6 mm

High

< 1 cm

Margin from the visible edge 4 mm

OR

Tumor removal with intraoperative control of all resection margins (e.g., Mohs micrographic surgery)

1.01 – 1.9 cm

Margin from the visible edge 6 mm

OR

Tumor removal with intraoperative morphological control of all margins (peripheral and deep) of resection (e.g., Mohs surgery)

≥2.0 cm

Margin from the visible edge 9 mm

OR

Tumor removal with intraoperative morphological control of all margins (peripheral and deep) of resection (e.g., Mohs surgery)

Consider performing sentinel lymph node biopsy

It is recommended that patients after standard surgical intervention with a margin of at least 6 mm from the visible edge of the tumor, if the tumor is detected at the resection margin during routine lifelong pathomorphological examination of the surgical specimen, undergo re-excision with intraoperative morphological control of all resection margins (peripheral and deep) or standard re-excision, or postoperative radiation therapy, or combination therapy (radiation therapy and systemic antineoplastic therapy) if the patient is no longer a candidate for surgical treatment [105-122].

GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)

It is recommended that all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of in situ CSCC (Bowen's disease) who, for any reason (poor general condition, patient refusal due to dissatisfaction with expected cosmetic results, etc.), are not planned to undergo surgical treatment, receive any of the destructive methods of CSCC treatment:

o curettage and electrocoagulation

o radiation therapy,

o cryodestruction,

o photodynamic therapy

o or topical agents with antitumor activity [123-146].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)

It is recommended that patients with a confirmed diagnosis of low-risk CSCC (see section 1.5.3) who are not candidates for surgical treatment undergo curettage and electrocoagulation (except for hair-bearing areas such as the scalp, pubic and axillary regions, as well as the beard area in men); if the fat layer is reached during curettage, surgical excision should generally be performed [19, 114, 147-149].

GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)

Comment: Curettage and electrocoagulation can be used by an oncologists for small (<2 cm), well-demarcated CSCC lesions with non-aggressive histology in low-risk areas. Curettage and electrocoagulation are not indicated for recurrent or high-risk CSCC. Curettage should be performed with a sharp curette until healthy tissue is reached, the obtained material should be sent for lifelong pathomorphological examination, and only after that should electrocoagulation of the tumor bed be performed

It is recommended that patients with a confirmed diagnosis of low-risk CSCC (see section 1.5.3) who are not suitable for surgical treatment (including when surgery may lead to unacceptable functional or cosmetic impairments for the patient) undergo radiation therapy to the primary tumor area [96, 150-152].

GGR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that patients with positive or "close" resection margins undergo radiation therapy to the area of the removed tumor to reduce the risk of recurrence [152]

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

It is recommended to use tissue-equivalent boluses to achieve an adequate skin dose during photon beam radiation therapy [153-155]

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comment: the choice of the type of radiation therapy (contact X-ray therapy, gamma and electron beam therapy, brachytherapy) and the dose fractionation regimen is carried out depending on the size and location of the tumor, the patient's condition, preferences, and the capabilities of the medical institution. Brachytherapy is not considered a standard approach in the treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and can be considered only in a strictly selected group of patients (e.g., skin cancer of the eyelids, including the canthus). Possible doses and regimens of external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy are given in Table 15.

Table 15. Regimens and doses of standalone external beam radiation therapy in low-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Tumor size

Examples of fractionation and treatment duration

links

< 2 cm

60–70 Gy in 6–7 weeks

[156]

50–55 Gy in 3–4 weeks

[157]

35 Gy in 10 fractions

[157]

30.6 Gy in 3 fractions over 14 days

[158]

54 Gy in 18 fractions

[159]

It is recommended for elderly patients or patients with severe comorbidities that limit the possibility of regular visits to the radiotherapy department to administer hypofractionated radiation therapy regimens (see Table 16) [160, 161].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comment: hypofractionated radiation therapy regimens are presented in Table 16.

Table 16. Hypofractionated radiation therapy

30 Gy in 6 fractions, 3 times a week

[160, 162]

50 Gy in 15 fractions, 5 times a week

[160, 161]

36.75 Gy in 7 fractions, 1–3 times a week

[160, 161]

35 Gy in 5 fractions, 1–3 times a week

[160, 161]

It is recommended that patients with positive or "close" resection margins undergo radiation therapy to the area of the removed tumor to reduce the risk of recurrence [163, 164].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

It is recommended to include the primary lesion in the irradiation volume with the following margins from the visible tumor boundaries: for contact X-ray therapy of T1-2 tumors – 1 cm; for brachytherapy of T1-2 tumors, the margin is 0.5 cm; for electron beam treatment of T1-3 tumors, the margin is 1–2 cm; for photon beam treatment of T3-4 tumors, the margin is 2 cm [156, 165].

GGR CLEL 4Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: when administering external beam radiation therapy using an electron or photon beam, it is advisable to use boluses of various thicknesses to ensure an adequate skin dose.

It is recommended that patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cSCC in situ (Bowen's disease) who are not eligible for surgical treatment undergo cryosurgery of the primary tumor [123-128, 137, 139, 140].

GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)

Comment: disadvantages include scarring, difficulty in assessing recurrence, and the lack of histological examination of the surgical specimen and proof of complete removal. A biopsy is required prior to the procedure to verify the diagnosis. Cryosurgery is not suitable for local recurrence of the disease or high-risk tumors. When performing cryosurgery, cryoprobes of an appropriate size that best match the shape of the tumor should be used. The skin should be firmly anchored to the underlying bone or cartilage. Freezing intensity can be monitored using an impedance meter (500–1000 kΩ, which corresponds to a freezing time of 30–60 seconds depending on the tumor size). Typically, 1–2 freeze-thaw cycles are performed.

It is recommended that patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cSCC in situ (Bowen's disease, Queyrat's erythroplakia) who are not candidates for surgical treatment undergo photodynamic therapy. Photodynamic therapy is particularly effective for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ and precancerous conditions (e.g., actinic keratosis) [127, 129-132, 135, 140-145, 166-171].

GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)

Comment: for invasive forms of cSCC, surgical treatment should be preferred. PDT is not recommended for high-risk cSCC.

For photodynamic therapy of cutaneous cSCC in situ (Bowen's disease, Queyrat's erythroplakia) as well as actinic keratosis, finished pharmaceutical formulations of ALA- and methyl aminolevulinate-based creams or gels for topical use are applied (extemporaneous preparation is not permitted). A course of PDT consists of drug administration and a PDT session. Prior to topical application of the drug, curettage of the skin neoplasm with a curette or scalpel blade is performed without anesthesia, if necessary. Following complete hemostasis, the drug is applied to the tumor surface extending 0.5–1.0 cm onto the surrounding healthy skin, followed by an occlusive water- and light-impermeable dressing. Exposure time is 3–4 hours. After exposure, the occlusive dressing is removed, and drug residues are wiped off with a dry gauze pad. A laser light source with a wavelength of 630±2 nm is used for photodynamic therapy. The laser irradiation dose is 75–200 J/cm2. Based on indications, prior to the PDT session, fluorescence diagnostics with a 400–405 nm light source may be performed to determine the required light spot diameter. Treatment consists of 2–4 PDT courses at intervals of 1–3 weeks [132, 167-173]. The response is evaluated 1.5–2 months after the second course. There are no restrictions regarding light exposure. In case of partial regression confirmed morphologically, PDT with chlorin e6 solutions/concentrates may be performed.

For PDT in cutaneous cSCC in situ with areas of microinvasion or an exophytic component, chlorin e6 solutions/concentrates are used (See also Table 17). The drug is administered intravenously at a dose of 1 mg/kg of the patient's body weight, dissolved in 150–200 ml of isotonic sodium chloride solution. Intravenous infusion is performed in a darkened room, and the vial with the prepared solution is shielded with a light-proof material. Three hours after administration, fluorescence diagnostics with a 400–405 nm light source is performed to delineate tumor margins on the skin surface; fluorescence is evaluated visually using filter glasses. A laser light source with a wavelength of 662±2 nm is used for photodynamic therapy. The laser irradiation dose is 300–350 J/cm2. Treatment consists of 1 course of photodynamic therapy with response assessment after 1–2 months. The light restriction period is 4 days following chlorin e6 administration. In case of partial tumor regression, a repeat course of photodynamic therapy with chlorin e6 solution/concentrate may be performed [174-178].

Table 17. Regimens of photosensitizer administration for photodynamic therapy of basal cell skin cancer

Medicinal product (photosensitizer)

Single dose

Route of administration

Light interval, min

Laser wavelength, nm

Dose, J/cm2

reference

Sum of sodium salts of chlorin e6, chlorin p6, purpurin 5

1.0 - 1.2 mg/kg

IV drip 30 min

in 200 ml of solvent

180 

662 (+/- 3)

300-350

[176]

Chlorin e6

1.0 mg/kg

IV drip 30 min

in 200 ml of solvent

180 

662 

300

[179, 180]

Chlorin e6 dimeglumine

1.0 mg/kg

IV drip 30 min

in 100 ml of solvent

180

662

300

[181]

It is recommended that patients with a confirmed diagnosis of cSCC in situ (see section 1.5.3) who are not eligible for surgical treatment undergo topical treatment with #imiquimod [133-136, 138, 140]. Regimens are provided in Table 18.

GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)

Table 18. Application regimens of #imiquimod for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen's disease)

#Imiquimod 5% cream, once daily, 7 days/week * 6 weeks, topically

[182]

#Imiquimod 5% cream, once daily, 5 days/week * 16 weeks, topically

[134]

3.1.2 Treatment of high-risk squamous cell carcinoma

It is recommended that all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of high-risk cSCC (see section 1.5.3) undergo tumor removal with intraoperative morphological control of all resection margins (peripheral and deep) during lifetime pathoanatomical examination of the surgical specimen (defect closure method is at the surgeon's discretion, although closure with transposed flaps is best performed after the absence of tumor in the resection margin is morphologically confirmed) [105-122, 147].

GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)

Comment: this type of surgery requires a trained team of oncologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, and pathologists and can be performed in specialized centers. Intraoperative histological examination should be performed according to the following sectioning, marking, and specimen preparation methods: Mohs micrographic surgery and slow Mohs (3D Histology Evaluation of Dermatologic Surgery, margin strip method, "Tübingen torte", "Munich" method) (see Table 19). In all cases where intraoperative histological evaluation using Mohs or slow Mohs methods is not feasible, the recommended safe margin of at least 4 mm from visible borders should be applied.

Table 19. Methods of surgical treatment with intraoperative morphological control of all resection margins (peripheral and deep)

Mohs surgery

Slow Mohs method (3D Histology Evaluation of Dermatologic Surgery, margin strip method, "Tübingen torte", "Munich" method)

Scalpel-to-tissue excision angle

45°

90°

Section preparation

Fresh-frozen cryostat sections

paraffin blocks

Turnaround time

20-60 minutes

24 hours (using a rapid tissue processor)

The standard loafing histological examination method should not be used to assess resection margins and completeness of tumor removal, as this method evaluates less than 1% of the removed tissue surface.

It is recommended that all patients with a confirmed diagnosis of high-risk cSCC (see section 1.5.3), in cases where tumor removal with intraoperative control of all resection margins (peripheral and deep) is not feasible, undergo standard excision with the widest possible margin (6 mm on the trunk and extremities, and 9 mm if the tumor is located on hair-bearing skin) from the visible tumor edge (including subcutaneous adipose tissue) with routine postoperative assessment of the resection margin during lifetime pathoanatomical examination of the surgical specimen (defect closure method at the surgeon's discretion) [105-122].

CGR CLEL 4Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendation Level C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comment: when performing standard surgical excision, it is recommended to mark orientation landmarks (12 o'clock) on the excised specimen and on the patient's body, which may be necessary when planning re-excision if the tumor is found at the resection margin during routine histological examination

It is recommended that patients who underwent standard surgery with a margin of at least 6 mm from the visible tumor edge, upon detection of tumor cells at the resection margin during routine lifetime pathoanatomical examination of the surgical specimen, undergo re-excision with intraoperative morphological control of all resection margins or be scheduled for radiation therapy if the patient is no longer a candidate for surgical treatment [105-122].

LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)

It is recommended that patients with a high risk of recurrence and metastasis (see section 1.5.3) with a skin tumor size of 2 cm or more, in the absence of clinical and instrumental signs of regional lymph node involvement, undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy to accurately determine the stage of the disease, the prognosis of the disease course, and to determine indications for adjuvant radiation therapy [183-193].

強B (level of recommendation — B)УДД 3Level of Recommendation — B (Level of Evidence — 3)

Comment: sentinel lymph node biopsy is performed in specialized institutions equipped with the necessary equipment and trained personnel.

It is recommended that patients with a confirmed diagnosis of high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) (see section 1.5.3) who are not candidates for surgical treatment, or with a detectable tumor at the resection margin which also cannot be removed for various reasons, undergo radiation therapy to the primary tumor area [96, 147, 150-152, 194-198]. Radiation therapy doses and regimens are given in Table 20.

GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence – 2)

Table 20. Regimens and doses of definitive external beam radiation therapy for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Clinical tumor features

Examples of fractionation and treatment duration

Source

· ≥2 cm OR

· T3/T4, OR

· with bone invasion, OR

· with soft tissue invasion

60 Gy in 6 weeks

50 Gy in 4 weeks

60 Gy in 3 weeks

[199]

50 Gy in 4 weeks (with bone/cartilage invasion)

[157]

66 Gy in 33 fractions, 5 times per week

70 Gy in 35 fractions, 5 times per week

55 Gy in 22 fractions, 5 times per week

54-57 Gy in 18-19 fractions, 5 times per week

45 Gy in 15 fractions, 5 times per week

It is recommended that patients with a confirmed diagnosis of high-risk cSCC, as well as patients with positive or close resection margins, undergo radiation therapy to the primary tumor area in order to reduce the risk of recurrence after surgical treatment [147, 199, 200]. Radiation therapy doses and regimens are given in Table 21.

GRB BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)

Table 21. Regimens and doses of external beam postoperative radiation therapy to the primary tumor area

Clinical tumor features

Examples of fractionation and treatment duration

Source

Postoperative radiation therapy to the primary tumor area

60 Gy in 6 weeks

[201]

50 Gy in 4 weeks

[202]

With positive or "close" resection margins

66-70 Gy in 33-35 fractions

55 Gy in 22 fractions, 5 times per week

54-57 Gy in 18-19 fractions, 5 times per week

45 Gy in 15 fractions, 5 times per week

It is recommended that patients with a confirmed diagnosis of high-risk head and neck cSCC (see section 1.5.3) without signs of clinical involvement of regional lymph nodes undergo radiation therapy to the regional lymph node drainage areas to reduce the risk of recurrence after surgical treatment [202]. Radiation therapy doses and regimens are provided below (Table 23).

GRB BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)

3.1.3 Treatment of high-risk squamous cell carcinoma localized to the skin of the eyelids (including the eyelid commissure)

The principles of treatment for high-risk cSCC localized to the eyelids described in section 3.1.2 are supplemented by the provisions of this section.

It is recommended to plan organ-preserving treatment for squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid skin, including the eyelid commissure, taking into account the size and localization of the tumor using microsurgical technique or a binocular loupe [77, 78, 80-82, 203].

GGR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to use radiowave or laser surgery using a CO2 laser for complete excision of nodular forms of squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid skin, including the eyelid commissure, and for biopsy in diffuse forms of squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid skin, including the eyelid commissure, in order to reduce its size and administer radiation therapy as part of combination treatment [77, 78, 80-82, 203, 204].

GRB CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

It is recommended to perform skin grafting in cases where spontaneous epithelization of the resulting defect after tumor removal may lead to eyelid deformation and, consequently, impaired eye function. Skin grafting is performed only if radical removal of squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid skin, including the eyelid commissure, is possible [77, 78, 80-82].

GGR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that surgical treatment for cSCC of the eyelid, including the eyelid commissure, extending into the orbit be performed in specialized centers [77, 78, 80-82, 203].

GGR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • In case of non-radical surgical removal of the neoplasm, it is recommended to administer external beam or contact radiation therapy (brachytherapy) (see Table 20, as well as tables 14, 18, 19) [182, 184-190].

GRB CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: Contact radiation therapy (brachytherapy) using ophthalmic applicators as an independent treatment method can be used when the tumor thickness is no more than 3 mm (see Table 22). Brachytherapy for larger tumor sizes is possible using multi-field irradiation. Planning of brachytherapy with ophthalmic applicators is based on the tumor base, and the surface dose of 90-120 Gy is determined as a derivative from the depth dose distribution curve of radiation in soft biological tissue.

Table 22. Regimens and doses of brachytherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the eyelid skin

Localization

Examples of fractionation and treatment duration

Source

Surface brachytherapy of eyelid cSCC, including the eyelid commissure, using strontium ophthalmic applicators

90-120 Gy in 3-5 fractions

[203, 205-211]

It is recommended that patients with a confirmed diagnosis of eyelid cSCC, including the eyelid commissure, who are not candidates for surgical treatment, undergo radiation therapy to the primary tumor area [203, 205-211].

GGR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: the choice of radiation therapy type (close-focus X-ray therapy, gamma and electron therapy, brachytherapy) and dose fractionation regimen is made depending on the size and localization of the tumor, the patient's condition, preferences, and the capabilities of the medical institution. It is recommended to exclude critical eye structures from the irradiation field. When administering external beam radiation therapy, the same approaches and regimens are used as for cSCC of other localizations (see Tables 15, 18, 19).

3.2 Treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with regional lymph node metastases (Stage III)

It is recommended to perform regional lymphadenectomy in all patients with resectable skin cancer metastases in regional lymph nodes [201, 212-220]

GRB BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation - B (Level of Evidence - 3)

  • Patients after radical surgical treatment for squamous cell carcinoma metastases in regional lymph nodes are recommended to undergo adjuvant radiation therapy (see Table 23) [199, 201, 212-221].

GRB CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation - C (Level of Evidence - 4)

Comment: in patients with the primary tumor localized in the head and neck, the rate of lymph node involvement in the parotid salivary gland area is up to 82%. This fact should be taken into account when planning the scope of examination and treatment for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the skin of the head and neck

Table 23. Regimens and doses of external beam radiation therapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma with regional lymph node involvement or high risk of regional lymph node involvement

Clinical situation

Examples of fractionation and treatment duration

reference

After lymph node dissection

Resection margin without signs of tumor growth, no ECE

50–60 Gy in 5–6 weeks

[199]

Signs of tumor growth at the resection margin, or presence of ECE

60–66 Gy in 6–7 weeks

[221]

Without lymph node dissection

No clinical signs of cervical regional lymph node involvement

50 Gy in 5 weeks

[202]

Clinical signs of cervical lymph node involvement are present

60–70 Gy over 6–7 weeks

[164]

Presence of perineural invasion in the primary tumor area

50–60 Gy in 5–6 weeks

[222]

3.3 Treatment of patients with metastatic and unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (stage III unresectable and stage IV)

It is recommended to determine the algorithm and management tactics for patients with metastatic and unresectable cSCC within a multidisciplinary team involving a surgeon, oncologist, and radiation therapist, taking into account the patient's general condition (including ECOG performance status assessment, see Appendix G1) [48].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendations — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

  • For patients with metastatic and unresectable cSCC, it is recommended to administer monoclonal antibodies blocking the interaction between programmed cell death receptor (PD-1) and its ligands, in the absence of contraindications. Regimes are listed below (Table 24) [223-229].

GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendations — B (Level of Evidence — 3)

Comment: currently, a drug from the class of PD-1 monoclonal antibody blockers has been investigated in a well-designed study and demonstrated efficacy in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma [227, 230-237]. For registered drugs (pembrolizumab**, nivolumab**), efficacy data for this pathology are derived from small non-randomized studies or individual clinical cases.

Table 24. Regimes of antineoplastic drug administration in metastatic or unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Drugs

Single dose

Route of administration

Interval between administrations

Planned treatment duration

reference

#Nivolumab**

3 mg/kg of body weight

intravenously as an infusion for 30–60 min

every 14 days

Long-term[1]

[229, 238-240]

Pembrolizumab**

200 mg

intravenously as an infusion for 30 min

every 21 days

Long-term1

[223-226, 241, 242]

  • For patients who have not responded to monotherapy with PD-1 monoclonal antibody blockers, or for patients with contraindications to PD-1 monoclonal antibody blockers, in the absence of contraindications, it is recommended to administer chemotherapy or EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy in combination with radiation therapy or as a monotherapy regimen [243-253] (see Table 25 and Table 26).

GCR CLEL 4Grade of Recommendations — C (Level of Evidence — 4)

Table 25. Chemotherapy regimens used concurrently with radiation therapy in unresectable locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Drug

Single (daily) dose

Route of administration

Interval between administrations

Planned treatment duration

Regimens and doses of external beam radiation therapy

reference

#Cisplatin**

75 - 100 mg/m2

intravenously as an infusion

on day 1, every 21 days

Until the end of RT course

70 Gy over 7 weeks

[221, 254]

#Cisplatin**

40 mg/m2

intravenously as an infusion

weekly (6 weeks)

Until the end of RT course

70 Gy over 7 weeks

[255]

#Carboplatin**

AUC=2

intravenously as an infusion

weekly (6 weeks)

Until the end of RT course

70 Gy over 7 weeks

[255]

#Cetuximab**

400 mg/m2

intravenously as an infusion

4-5 days before radiation therapy

[248, 249, 251, 256]

#Cetuximab**

250 mg/m2

intravenously as an infusion

weekly

During radiation therapy

70 Gy over 7 weeks

Table 26. Chemotherapy regimens used as monotherapy

Drugs

Single dose

Route of administration

Interval between administrations

Planned treatment duration

reference

#Cisplatin**

50 – 60 mg/m2

intravenously as an infusion

on day 1, every 21 – 28 days

long-term[2]

[243, 249, 250, 257]

#Doxorubicin**

50 mg/m2 on day 1

#Cisplatin**

75 mg/m2

intravenously as an infusion

on day 1, every 21 days

long-term1

#Doxorubicin**

50 mg/m2 on day 1

#Carboplatin**

AUC = 2

intravenously as an infusion

weekly

6 weeks

[249]

#Paclitaxel**

80 mg/m2

#Cisplatin**

60 mg/m2

intravenously as an infusion

on day 1 every 21-28 days

long-term1

[249, 258]

#Capecitabine**

1000 mg/m2 per day in two divided doses

orally

2 times a day from days 1 to 14, every 21-28 days

#Cisplatin**

100 mg/m2

intravenously as an infusion

on day 1, every 21 days

long-term1

[246]

Fluorouracil**

1000 mg/m2

continuous infusion

days 1 to 5, every 21 days

#Cetuximab**

initial dose 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2

intravenously as an infusion

weekly

Long-term1

[259]

#Panitumumab**

6 mg/kg of body weight

intravenously as an infusion

every 14 days

no more than 9 courses of therapy

[253]

  • When performing antitumor drug therapy, when calculating drug doses based on body surface area or body weight, it is recommended to round actual doses within 5% of the calculated doses [260, 261].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • For patients with locally advanced or metastatic cSCC in case of progression or stabilization during therapy with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting PD-1 inhibitors, it is recommended to administer drug therapy according to the following regimen:

Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV infusion once every 21 days + #cetuximab 400 mg/m2 (loading dose) followed by 250 mg/m2 IV infusion weekly [262]

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • For patients with locally advanced or metastatic cSCC in the second and subsequent lines after chemotherapy, it is recommended to administer anti-PD-1 immunotherapy according to the following regimen: pembrolizumab 200 mg IV infusion once every 21 days continuously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or up to 2 years of therapy (35 infusions) [240].

It is recommended for elderly patients with unresectable cSCC or patients with severe comorbidities that limit the feasibility of regular visits to the radiotherapy department to undergo radiotherapy in a hypofractionated regimen (see Table 27) [160, 161].

Table 27. Hypofractionated radiotherapy

30 Gy in 6 fractions, 3 times a week

[160, 162]

50 Gy in 15 fractions, 5 times a week

[160, 161]

36.75 Gy in 7 fractions, 1–3 times a week

[160, 161]

35 Gy in 5 fractions, 1–3 times a week

[160, 161]

3.4 Supportive care in patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

The principles of treatment and prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the skin correspond to the principles outlined in the guidelines "PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING" [263]

The principles of treatment and prevention of bone complications in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the skin correspond to the principles outlined initudes "USE OF OSTEOMODIFYING AGENTS FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF BONE PATHOLOGY IN MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS" [264]

The principles of prevention and treatment of infectious complications and febrile neutropenia in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the skin correspond to the principles outlined in the guidelines "TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA AND ADMINISTRATION OF COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS" [265]

The principles of prevention and treatment in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the skin correspond to the principles outlined in the guidelines "CORRECTION OF HEPATOTOXICITY" [266]

The principles of prevention and treatment of cardiovascular complications in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the skin correspond to the principles outlined in the guidelines "PRACTICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE CORRECTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR TOXICITY OF ANTITUMOR DRUG THERAPY" [267]

The principles of prevention and treatment of skin complications in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the skin correspond to the principles outlined in the guidelines "PRACTICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE DRUG TREATMENT OF DERMATOLOGICAL REACTIONS IN PATIENTS RECEIVING ANTITUMOR DRUG THERAPY" [268]

The principles of nutritional support in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the skin correspond to the principles outlined in the guidelines "PRACTICAL GUIDELINES FOR NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT IN CANCER PATIENTS" [269]

The principles of prevention and treatment of nephrotoxicity in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the skin correspond to the principles outlined in the guidelines "PRACTICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE CORRECTION OF NEPHROTOXICITY OF ANTITUMOR DRUGS" [270]

The principles of prevention and treatment of thromboembolic complications in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the skin correspond to the principles outlined in the guidelines "PRACTICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF THROMBOEMBOLIC COMPLICATIONS IN CANCER PATIENTS" [271]

The principles of prevention and treatment of the consequences of drug extravasation in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the skin correspond to the principles outlined in the guidelines "RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF ANTITUMOR DRUG EXTRAVASATION" [272]

The principles of prevention and treatment of immune-mediated adverse events in patients with basal cell carcinoma of the skin correspond to the principles outlined in the guidelines "PRACTICAL GUIDELINES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF IMMUNE-MEDIATED ADVERSE EVENTS" [273]

3.5 Diet therapy.

Diet therapy is not used in the treatment of patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

[1] Hereinafter in tables 22–24, in the column "Planned duration of treatment", "continuously" means the continuation of therapy until confirmed disease progression or the development of unacceptable toxicity.

[2] Hereinafter in tables 22–24, in the column "Planned duration of treatment", "continuously" means the continuation of therapy until confirmed disease progression or the development of unacceptable toxicity

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

Currently, there are no clinical studies involving patients with cSCC for most types of medical rehabilitation. These recommendations are based on the fact that numerous studies, including meta-analyses (Steffens, D et al. 2018, etc.) and systematic reviews (Nicole L. Stout et al., 2017 and R. Segal et al., 2017, etc.), have proven that various types of medical rehabilitation significantly accelerate functional recovery, reduce hospital stay after surgery, and lower the incidence of complications and mortality in patients with other malignant neoplasms.

4.1. Pre-rehabilitation

It is recommended to perform pre-rehabilitation in all patients with cSCC in order to accelerate functional recovery, reduce postoperative hospital stay, and decrease the rate of complications and mortality during cSCC treatment. Pre-rehabilitation includes physical training (exercise therapy), psychological and nutritional support, and patient education [274].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: it is advisable to advise the patient to increase physical activity 2 weeks before surgery in order to reduce hospital stay and the risk of postoperative complications, as well as to improve quality of life in the postoperative period [275].

4.2. Surgical treatment

4.2.1. First stage of rehabilitation

It is recommended to apply a multidisciplinary approach in the rehabilitation of patients in oncodermatology, including physical rehabilitation, psychological support, and occupational therapy (occupational therapy instructors) [276].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended that the goals of restorative treatment be considered: restoration of the range of motion in the operated body part, restoration of muscle tone, increase in muscle strength of the operated limb, and correction of muscle imbalance [277].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to start restorative treatment early, as it improves functional outcomes after surgeries in oncodermatology [277].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that the exercise therapy (physical therapy) program be developed individually in each specific case, based on the characteristics and extent of the surgery [278].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to combine positioning therapy, exercise therapy, cryotherapy to the surgical area, medical massage, and electrotherapy for pain relief [279].

Level of Evidence CGrade of Evidence 5Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to gradually expand the scope of exercise therapy. When active abduction becomes possible, full weight-bearing on the operated limb is permitted [277].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that all patients scheduled for surgical treatment for cSCC be evaluated for risk factors for hypertrophic and keloid scars [280–296].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: Risk factors are classified as local, systemic, genetic, and lifestyle-related. Local risk factors: hypertrophic and keloid scars are more common in anatomical areas subject to regular stretching during daily body movements, including major joints, the anterior chest wall, the scapular region, and the lower abdomen. Systemic factors include high levels of the female hormone estrogen, hypertension, and Castleman disease. Genetic factors include several single nucleotide polymorphisms, Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome, and hereditary exostoses. Lifestyle-related factors include intense sports and physical labor [280–296].

It is recommended for all patients at risk of developing hypertrophic and keloid scars after surgical interventions in susceptible areas of the body to use reconstructive and plastic surgical techniques that limit skin tension (flap techniques, Z-plasty, as well as subcutaneous and deep fascial sutures to reduce tension) [288, 297].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that all patients at risk of hypertrophic and keloid scars following surgical interventions in vulnerable areas of the body restrict postoperative wound tension using fixation materials (adhesive tape strips, gel pads, silicone gels, or compression silicone dressings and garments) [288, 297-302].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

4.2.2. Second stage of rehabilitation

It is recommended to use techniques aimed at scar mobilization to prevent the formation of coarse scar changes, including in the deep layers of soft tissues: deep massage, stretching exercises, and ultrasound therapy to soften scar changes [303].

GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended to administer complete decongestive therapy in the event of lymphedema, including manual lymphatic drainage, compression garments, exercise therapy (physical therapy), and skin care [304].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that all patients undergoing surgery in areas of the body susceptible to hypertrophic and keloid scar formation undergo careful monitoring for the early clinical symptoms of hypertrophic and keloid scars for 3–12 months. If signs of hypertrophic and keloid scars are detected, topical (non-injection) and injection corticosteroid therapy should be initiated [297].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

4.2.3. Third stage of rehabilitation

It is recommended to perform and gradually expand exercise therapy (physical therapy) incorporating aerobic load, which improves the outcomes of combined treatment for malignant neoplasms and quality of life [305].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Medical massage is recommended to improve quality of life and reduce pain syndrome and fatigue [306].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

4.3. Chemotherapy

It is recommended to start physical activity early during chemotherapy, which helps prevent muscle weakness, hypotrophy, and decreased exercise tolerance [307].

GCR CLEL 3Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 3)

  • This recommendation is based on the results of systematic reviews by Nicole L. Stout et al., 2017 and R. Segal et al., 2017 on the effect of exercise in patients with other malignancies—it is recommended to incorporate aerobic exercise during chemotherapy, which increases hemoglobin and erythrocyte levels, reduces the duration of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, and increases the likelihood of completing the planned chemotherapy course [308, 309].

GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended to perform balance training exercises, which are more effective for correcting polyneuropathy than a combination of endurance and strength exercises [310].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to use low-level laser therapy in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral polyneuropathy [311].

GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations — B (Level of Evidence — 2)

It is recommended to use low-frequency magnetic therapy in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral polyneuropathy [312].

GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations — B (Level of Evidence — 2)

It is recommended to use transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for 20 minutes a day, 4 weeks, for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy [313].

GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended to use low-level laser therapy to prevent chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis [314].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation — A (Level of Evidence — 1)

It is recommended to implement a course of exercise therapy (physical therapy), which reduces the incidence of cardiac complications during chemotherapy [315].

GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended to use scalp cooling systems, which prevent alopecia during chemotherapy [316].

GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

4.4. Radiation therapy

It is recommended to perform exercise therapy (physical therapy) consisting of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise combined with strength training during radiation therapy, which helps prevent fatigue and improves quality of life during radiation therapy [317].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform exercise therapy (physical therapy), which increases bone tissue density and patient endurance during radiation therapy, primarily in patients with bone metastases [318].

GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendations — B (Level of Evidence — 2)

It is recommended to initiate low-level laser therapy 3 days after the start of radiation therapy, 3 days a week, for the prevention of radiation dermatitis [319].

GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

4.5. Principles of psychological rehabilitation in patients with malignant skin neoplasms

It is recommended to inform patients about the disease, psychological reactions, areas of responsibility during treatment, methods of communication with relatives and medical staff, ways to obtain additional information about their disease or condition, and ways to obtain social support, which leads to an improved quality of life and disease outcome [320-322].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to achieve a combined effect of coping behavior and perceived social support, which leads to fewer intrusive and avoidant thoughts before treatment and ensures better psychological adaptation 1 month after treatment [323, 324].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Psychoeducational interventions and psychological support are recommended (self-diagnosis of pathological mental reactions, stress-coping methods, monitoring the mutual influence of mental reactions and physical state), which can be considered the main mechanism for transforming stressful events into personal experience, contributing to social and psychological adaptation under the conditions of disease and treatment [325, 326].

GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: most frequently in psycho-oncology research, 3 coping styles are observed among patients with melanoma and NMSC:

(1) active behavioral coping with emotional, physical, and social difficulties associated with the disease and treatment;

(2) active cognitive coping, including attitudes, beliefs, and reflections about the disease;

(3) avoidance coping, involving attempts to actively avoid problems or indirectly reduce emotional stress through distraction.

Overall, studies show that patients who use active (problem-focused) coping strategies demonstrate better adjustment to the disease than those who use passive or avoidant coping styles [327-330]

Patients who used active behavioral coping methods reported higher levels of self-esteem and energy, fewer physical symptoms, and reduced irritability and asthenia [331, 332].

In contrast, in patients with early-stage melanoma and NMSC, a positive correlation was demonstrated between avoidance coping methods and anxiety, depression, confusion, and unstable mood [327, 331-333]

Boesen et al. demonstrated that structured interventions offering psychoeducational support help reduce distress and mood disorders and lead to more active use of coping strategies among patients with melanoma and NMSC [334, 335].

It is recommended to conduct targeted psychological correction measures for mental reactions associated with NMSC (astheno-anxious-depressive reactions, narcissistic reactions, PTSD-related reactions, social isolation), which leads to reduced anxiety, health-related disorders, and positive changes in coping with the disease [336].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: The results of psychological correction measures demonstrate low levels of depression, confusion, asthenia, apathy, and general depressed mood among patients with melanoma and NMSC [327]. Furthermore, numerous studies demonstrate a positive effect of the intervention on immune system functions, including an increase in certain types of natural killer (NK) cells and enhanced tumor-fighting potential of NK cells [332]. Over 5 years of follow-up, these researchers were able to show that psychological and biological changes were, in turn, associated with recurrence and survival rates [331].

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

To date, there is no consensus regarding the frequency and intensity of follow-up for CSCC patients. The goals of patient monitoring should be the early detection of disease recurrence, early detection of second tumors (specifically a new CSCC, as well as CSCC and cutaneous melanoma), and psychosocial support for patients.

  • In order to reduce the risk of developing cutaneous melanoma, NMSC (including CSCC), and to prevent the occurrence of new melanomas or other malignant skin neoplasms, it is recommended to avoid sunburn or exposure to artificial ultraviolet radiation [337-344].

GCR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2)

  • All patients with a previously established diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin are recommended to perform regular self-examinations of the skin and peripheral lymph nodes and to consult a physician promptly if any abnormalities are detected [345, 346].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Table 28 shows the recommended follow-up schedule for patient monitoring with a previously established diagnosis, compiled on the basis of recommendations given in the "Diagnostics" section and the risks of disease progression.

Table 28 Schedule and content of follow-up visits for patients with CSCC [342, 343, 347-350]

Stage of the disease (or equivalent)

Physical examination

Lymph node ultrasound

Full-scale diagnostic radiology

Years of follow-up

Years of follow-up

Years of follow-up

1–3

4–5

6–10

1–3

4–5

6–10

1–3

4–5

6–10

0–I (low risk[1])

Every 6 months

Every 12 months

Every 12 months

As indicated

As indicated

As indicated

As indicated

As indicated

As indicated

I-II (high risk[2])

Every 3 months

Every 6 months

Every 12 months

Every 3 months

Every 6 months

As indicated

As indicated

As indicated

As indicated

III-IV

Every 6 months

Every 12 months

Every 12 months

Every 3 months

Every 6 months

As indicated

Every 6 months

As indicated

As indicated

  • For patients with stage 0-I disease and low risk of recurrence after completion of treatment, it is recommended to perform a physical examination with a thorough assessment of the skin and peripheral lymph nodes every 6 months for the first 3 years, then annually for 10 years of follow-up. Instrumental examinations are recommended only when clinically indicated, in accordance with the recommendations given in the subsection "Instrumental diagnostic examinations" [342, 343, 347-350] (see also Table 28).

Level of recommendation – C (Evidence level – 5)Level of evidence – 5Level of recommendation – C (level of evidence – 5)

  • For patients with stage I-II disease and high risk of recurrence after completion of treatment, it is recommended to perform a physical examination with a thorough assessment of the skin and peripheral lymph nodes every 3 months for the first 3 years, then every 6 months up to 5 years of follow-up, then annually for 10 years of follow-up. Instrumental examinations are recommended only when clinically indicated, in accordance with the recommendations given in the subsection "Instrumental diagnostic examinations" [342, 343, 347-350] (see also Table 28).

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • For patients with stage III-IV disease after completion of treatment, it is recommended to perform physical examinations with a thorough assessment of the skin and peripheral lymph nodes every 3 months for the first 3 years, then annually for 10 years of follow-up. Instrumental examinations are recommended during the first 3 years at intervals of once every 6 months (or more frequently if indicated, in accordance with the recommendations given in the subsection "Instrumental diagnostic examinations" [342, 343, 347-350] (see also Table 28).

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended to provide lifelong ophthalmological follow-up for patients with CSCC of the eyelid skin, including the palpebral commissure; examination of patients in this group is recommended every 3 months after completion of treatment for 1 year, then every 6 months for the next 3 years, and thereafter once a year for life [351].

GGR CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

[1] see section 1.5.3

[2] see section 1.5.3

6. Organization of Medical Care

Medical care, with the exception of medical care provided as part of clinical trials, in accordance with Federal Law No. 323-FZ dated November 21, 2011 (as amended on May 25, 2019) "On the Fundamentals of Protecting Public Health in the Russian Federation", is organized and provided:

1) in accordance with the regulations on the organization of medical care by types of medical care, which is approved by the authorized federal executive body;

2) in accordance with the procedure for the provision of medical care in the profile "oncology", mandatory for implementation throughout the Russian Federation by all medical organizations;

3) based on these clinical guidelines;

4) taking into account the standards of medical care approved by the authorized federal executive body.

Primary specialized health care is provided by an oncologist and other medical specialists at an outpatient oncological care center or in a primary oncological office, primary oncological department, or outpatient department of an oncological dispensary.

If CSCC is suspected or detected in a patient, general practitioners, district general practitioners, family physicians, medical specialists, and mid-level medical personnel shall refer the patient in the established manner for consultation to an outpatient oncology center, a primary oncology office, or a primary oncology department of a medical organization to receive primary specialized health care.

Consultation at an outpatient oncological care center or a primary oncological office/department of a medical organization must be carried out no later than 5 working days from the date of issuing the referral for consultation. The oncologist of the outpatient oncological care center (or the oncologist of the primary oncological office/department, if no such center exists) shall organize the collection of biopsy (surgical) material, as well as the execution of other diagnostic tests necessary to establish the diagnosis, including the extent of the oncological process and the stage of the disease.

If it is impossible to collect biopsy (surgical) material or perform other diagnostic tests at the medical organization that houses the outpatient oncological care center (primary oncological office, primary oncological department), the attending physician shall refer the patient to an oncological dispensary or a medical organization providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases.

The timeframe for performing pathological anatomical examinations necessary for the histological verification of a malignant neoplasm shall not exceed 15 working days from the date of receipt of the biopsy (surgical) material at the department of pathological anatomy (pathology bureau).

If CSCC is suspected or detected during the provision of emergency medical care, patients are transferred or referred to medical organizations providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases to determine management tactics and the need for additional specialized antineoplastic treatment methods.

When CSCC of the eyelid skin, including the palpebral commissure, is detected or suspected, considering the specifics of treatment, it is necessary to arrange a consultation (in-person or via telemedicine technologies) at the oncological department of ophthalmological clinics.

The oncologist of the outpatient oncological care center (primary oncological office, primary oncological department) shall refer the patient to an oncological dispensary or medical organizations providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases to clarify the diagnosis (if the oncologist of the outpatient oncological care center, primary oncological office, or primary oncological department is unable to establish the diagnosis, including the extent of the oncological process and the stage of the disease) and to receive specialized, including high-tech, medical care.

The timeframe for initiating specialized, excluding high-tech, medical care for patients with oncological diseases in a medical organization providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases shall not exceed 14 calendar days from the date of histological verification of the malignant neoplasm or 14 calendar days from the date of establishing a preliminary diagnosis of a malignant neoplasm (in the absence of medical indications for outpatient pathological anatomical examinations).

Specialized, including high-tech, medical care is provided by oncologists and radiation therapists in an oncological dispensary or in medical organizations providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases that hold a license, have the necessary material and technical base and certified specialists, in inpatient and day-hospital settings, and includes the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of oncological diseases requiring the use of special methods and complex unique medical technologies, as well as medical rehabilitation.

In a medical organization providing care to cancer patients, the tactics of medical examination and treatment shall be determined by a concilium of oncologists and radiation therapists, involving other medical specialists if necessary. The decision of the medical concilium shall be drawn up in a protocol, signed by the participating physicians, and entered into the patient's medical documentation.

Indications for hospitalization in a 24-hour inpatient unit or day hospital of a medical organization providing specialized, including high-tech, medical care in the profile of «oncology» are determined by a medical council of oncologists and radiation therapists, with the involvement of other medical specialists if necessary.

Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization in an emergency or urgent form are:

1) the presence of CSCC complications requiring specialized medical care in an emergency and urgent form;

2) the presence of complications of treatment (surgery, radiation therapy, drug therapy, etc.) for CSCC.

Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization in a planned form are:

1) the need to perform complex interventional diagnostic medical procedures requiring subsequent observation in a 24-hour inpatient unit or day hospital;

2) the presence of indications for specialized anti-tumor treatment (surgical intervention, radiation therapy—including contact, external beam, and other types of radiation therapy—drug therapy, etc.) requiring observation in a 24-hour inpatient unit or day hospital.

Indications for discharging a patient from a medical organization are:

1) completion of the course of treatment or one of the stages of specialized, including high-tech, medical care in a 24-hour inpatient unit or day hospital, provided there are no treatment complications requiring drug correction and/or medical interventions in an inpatient setting;

2) refusal by the patient or their legal representative of specialized, including high-tech, medical care in a 24-hour inpatient unit or day hospital prescribed by the medical council of the oncological care organization, provided there are no complications of the underlying disease and/or treatment requiring drug correction and/or medical interventions in an inpatient setting;

3) the need to transfer the patient to another medical organization in the relevant medical care profile. The conclusion on the feasibility of transferring the patient to a specialized medical organization is made after a preliminary consultation based on the provided medical documents and/or preliminary examination data by specialists of the medical organization to which the transfer is planned.

Medical procedures that can be provided as part of primary specialized medical care (i.e., on an outpatient basis) under the supervision of an oncologist:

1) incisional and excisional biopsy of a neoplasm suspicious for CSCC;

2) obtaining tumor touch preps;

3) fine-needle aspiration biopsy of superficially located organs (lymph nodes, soft tissue neoplasms);

4) core needle biopsy of superficially located organs (lymph nodes, soft tissue neoplasms);

Indications for referring a patient to another medical organization:

— clinical guidelines are intended to maximize the quality of medical care provided to patients in various clinical situations. If a medical organization lacks the capability to perform the recommended scope of medical care (for example, lacks the capability to perform surgical tumor removal with intraoperative morphological control of all resection margins), it is recommended to use the referral system to other medical organizations, including outside the constituent entity of the Russian Federation, including federal centers with appropriate equipment and personnel;

— clinical guidelines do not cover the entire diversity of real clinical practice and include only the most frequent and typical clinical situations. If a practicing physician or medical organization encounters a clinical situation not reflected in these clinical guidelines (atypical disease course, the need to initiate antitumor therapy in the presence of contraindications, progression during recommended treatments, etc.), it is recommended to use the system of telemedicine consultations or referral to national medical research centers to clarify treatment tactics;

— the detection or exacerbation of a comorbid condition unrelated to the profile of the cancer institution that prevents the implementation of this treatment stage (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, acute stroke, etc.) requires referral to specialized medical organizations.

7. Additional Information

Known prognostic factors for non-melanoma skin cancers that are recommended to be recorded are presented in Table 29 and Table 30.

Table 29. Prognostic factors in non-melanoma skin cancers (according to the 8th edition TNM classification [47])

Factor category

Prognostic factors

Tumor-associated

Patient-associated

Environment-associated

Required for assessment

· TNM

· Morphological type of tumor

· Localization

· Thickness (in mm)

· Perineural invasion (clinically assessed)

· Immunosuppression

· Disease recurrence

· Resection margins

· Previous radiation therapy

Additional

· Tumor margins

· Degree of differentiation

· Growth rate

· Lymphovascular invasion

· Perineural invasion (instrumentally assessed)

· Genetic factor (albinism, xeroderma pigmentosum)

· Age

· Chronic inflammation

· Scars

· Burns

· Smoking (for squamous cell carcinoma)

New and promising

· Micrometastases according to sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)

· Molecular genetic testing

· Viral etiology

· High-conformation radiotherapy

· Chemoradiotherapy

· Targeted therapy

· Intratumoral therapy

Table 30 Prognostic factors for non-melanoma skin cancers of the eyelid, including the palpebral commissure (according to the 8th edition TNM classification [47])

Factor category

Prognostic factors

Tumor-associated

Patient-associated

Environment-associated

Required for assessment

· TNM

· Localization (worse prognosis with orbital or sinus involvement)

· Immunosuppression

· Presence of metastases in parotid (preauricular) or cervical lymph nodes

· Systemic metastatic disease at diagnosis

·      

Additional

· Sebaceous gland carcinomas have a worse prognosis than BCC or SCC

New and promising

· Local control is associated with a better prognosis regarding systemic recurrence

The G criterion characterizes the grade of tumor differentiation:

  • GX – differentiation grade cannot be assessed;

  • G1 – well-differentiated tumor;

  • G2 – moderately differentiated tumor;

  • G3 – poorly differentiated tumor;

  • G4 – undifferentiated tumor.

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

Criteria for evaluating the quality of medical care are given in Table 31

Table 31. Criteria for evaluating the quality of medical care

№

Quality criteria

Performance evaluation

1

Morphological verification of the diagnosis was performed prior to the initiation of specific antineoplastic treatment (except for emergency surgery cases)

Yes/No

2

Risk factors for disease recurrence were assessed in accordance with section 1.5.3 of these guidelines prior to the initiation of specific antineoplastic treatment

Yes/No

3

Pathological examination of the surgical specimen was performed (in case of surgical intervention)

Yes/No

4

A patient at high risk of disease recurrence was offered surgical treatment with intraoperative morphological control of all resection margins (peripheral and deep) in the absence of contraindications

Yes/No

5

For a patient with a low risk of disease recurrence (in accordance with section 1.5.3 of these guidelines), options for standard surgical treatment, radiation therapy, #imiquimod therapy, PDT, and cryodestruction were considered

Yes/No

6       

A patient with unresectable or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma was prescribed therapy with PD-1 monoclonal antibody blockers in the absence of contraindications

Yes/No

References

Show references
  1. WHO Classification of Skin Tumours, 4th edn; 2018.

  2. Verkouteren JAC, Ramdas KHR, Wakkee M, Nijsten T: Epidemiology of basal cell carcinoma: scholarly review. Br J Dermatol 2017, 177(2):359-372.

  3. Fitzpatrick TB: The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol 1988, 124(6):869-871.

  4. Rosso S, Zanetti R, Martinez C, Tormo MJ, Schraub S, Sancho-Garnier H, Franceschi S, Gafa L, Perea E, Navarro C et al: The multicentre south European study "Helios". II: Different sun exposure patterns in the aetiology of basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. Br J Cancer 1996, 73(11):1447-1454.

  5. Gupta AK, Cardella CJ, Haberman HF: Cutaneous malignant neoplasms in patients with renal transplants. Arch Dermatol 1986, 122(11):1288-1293.

  6. Jensen P, Hansen S, Moller B, Leivestad T, Pfeffer P, Geiran O, Fauchald P, Simonsen S: Skin cancer in kidney and heart transplant recipients and different long-term immunosuppressive therapy regimens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999, 40(2 Pt 1):177-186.

  7. Patel RV, Clark LN, Lebwohl M, Weinberg JM: Treatments for psoriasis and the risk of malignancy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009, 60(6):1001-1017.

  8. Silverberg MJ, Leyden W, Warton EM, Quesenberry CP, Jr., Engels EA, Asgari MM: HIV infection status, immunodeficiency, and the incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2013, 105(5):350-360.

  9. Asgari MM, Arron ST, Warton EM, Quesenberry CP, Jr., Weisshaar D: Sirolimus use and risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs). J Am Acad Dermatol 2015, 73(3):444-450.

  10. Brewer JD, Shanafelt TD, Khezri F, Sosa Seda IM, Zubair AS, Baum CL, Arpey CJ, Cerhan JR, Call TG, Roenigk RK et al: Increased incidence and recurrence rates of nonmelanoma skin cancer in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a Rochester Epidemiology Project population-based study in Minnesota. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015, 72(2):302-309.

  11. Gerber SR, Seifert B, Inci I, Serra AL, Kohler M, Benden C, Hofbauer GF, Schuurmans MM: Exposure to moxifloxacin and cytomegalovirus replication is associated with skin squamous cell carcinoma development in lung transplant recipients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2015, 29(12):2451-2457.

  12. Hock BD, McIntosh ND, McKenzie JL, Pearson JF, Simcock JW, MacPherson SA: Incidence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in a New Zealand population of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia patients. Intern Med J 2016, 46(12):1414-1421.

  13. van den Heuvel TR, Wintjens DS, Jeuring SF, Wassink MH, Romberg-Camps MJ, Oostenbrug LE, Sanduleanu S, Hameeteman WH, Zeegers MP, Masclee AA et al: Inflammatory bowel disease, cancer and medication: Cancer risk in the Dutch population-based IBDSL cohort. Int J Cancer 2016, 139(6):1270-1280.

  14. Diffey BL, Norval M, Albers PN, Wright CY: The influence of HIV infection on the age dependence of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin in South Africa. S Afr Med J 2017, 107(2):127-129.

  15. Zilinska Z, Sersenova M, Chrastina M, Breza J, Sr., Bena L, Baltesova T, Jurcina A, Roland R, Lackova E, Cellar M et al: Occurrence of malignancies after kidney transplantation in adults: Slovak multicenter experience. Neoplasma 2017, 64(2):311-317.

  16. Stern RS, Lunder EJ: Risk of squamous cell carcinoma and methoxsalen (psoralen) and UV-A radiation (PUVA). A meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol 1998, 134(12):1582-1585.

  17. Leffell DJ, Carucci JA: Management of Skin Cancer. In: Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. 6th edn. Edited by Devita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; .

  18. Edwards MJ, Hirsch RM, Broadwater JR, Netscher DT, Ames FC: Squamous cell carcinoma arising in previously burned or irradiated skin. Arch Surg 1989, 124(1):115-117.

  19. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL, Jr.: Prognostic factors for local recurrence, metastasis, and survival rates in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, ear, and lip. Implications for treatment modality selection. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992, 26(6):976-990.

  20. Eroglu A, Berberoglu U, Berreroglu S: Risk factors related to locoregional recurrence in squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Surg Oncol 1996, 61(2):124-130.

  21. Snyder RJ, Stillman RM, Weiss SD: Epidermoid cancers that masquerade as venous ulcer disease. Ostomy Wound Manage 2003, 49(4):63-64, 65-66.

  22. Combemale P, Bousquet M, Kanitakis J, Bernard P, Angiodermatology Group FSoD: Malignant transformation of leg ulcers: a retrospective study of 85 cases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007, 21(7):935-941.

  23. Al-Zacko SM: Malignancy in chronic burn scar: a 20 year experience in Mosul-Iraq. Burns 2013, 39(7):1488-1491.

  24. Karasoy Yesilada A, Zeynep Sevim K, Ozgur Sucu D, Akcal A, Karsidag S, Kilinc L, Orhan Kizilkaya H: Marjolin ulcer: clinical experience with 34 patients over 15 years. J Cutan Med Surg 2013, 17(6):404-409.

  25. Natafji N, Tidman MJ: Improving detection of non-melanoma skin cancer Non-melanoma skin cancer. Practitioner 2015, 259(1784):23-27, 23.

  26. Onesti MG, Fino P, Fioramonti P, Amorosi V, Scuderi N: Ten years of experience in chronic ulcers and malignant transformation. Int Wound J 2015, 12(4):447-450.

  27. Khullar G, Saikia UN, De D, Handa S, Das Radotra B: Predisposing factors and histopathological variants of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Experience from a North Indian teaching hospital. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 2016, 82(3):273-278.

  28. Marks R, Rennie G, Selwood TS: Malignant transformation of solar keratoses to squamous cell carcinoma. Lancet 1988, 1(8589):795-797.

  29. Criscione VD, Weinstock MA, Naylor MF, Luque C, Eide MJ, Bingham SF, Department of Veteran Affairs Topical Tretinoin Chemoprevention Trial G: Actinic keratoses: Natural history and risk of malignant transformation in the Veterans Affairs Topical Tretinoin Chemoprevention Trial. Cancer 2009, 115(11):2523-2530.

  30. Eimpunth S, Goldenberg A, Hamman MS, Oganesyan G, Lee RA, Hunnangkul S, Song SS, Greywal T, Jiang SIB: Squamous Cell Carcinoma In Situ Upstaged to Invasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A 5-Year, Single Institution Retrospective Review. Dermatol Surg 2017, 43(5):698-703.

  31. Jayaraman SS, Rayhan DJ, Hazany S, Kolodney MS: Mutational landscape of basal cell carcinomas by whole-exome sequencing. J Invest Dermatol 2014, 134(1):213-220.

  32. Luande J, Henschke CI, Mohammed N: The Tanzanian human albino skin. Natural history. Cancer 1985, 55(8):1823-1828.

  33. Kraemer KH, Lee MM, Scotto J: Xeroderma pigmentosum. Cutaneous, ocular, and neurologic abnormalities in 830 published cases. Arch Dermatol 1987, 123(2):241-250.

  34. Bradford PT, Goldstein AM, Tamura D, Khan SG, Ueda T, Boyle J, Oh KS, Imoto K, Inui H, Moriwaki S et al: Cancer and neurologic degeneration in xeroderma pigmentosum: long term follow-up characterises the role of DNA repair. J Med Genet 2011, 48(3):168-176.

  35. Mabula JB, Chalya PL, McHembe MD, Jaka H, Giiti G, Rambau P, Masalu N, Kamugisha E, Robert S, Gilyoma JM: Skin cancers among Albinos at a University teaching hospital in Northwestern Tanzania: a retrospective review of 64 cases. BMC Dermatol 2012, 12:5.

  36. Halkud R, Shenoy AM, Naik SM, Chavan P, Sidappa KT, Biswas S: Xeroderma pigmentosum: clinicopathological review of the multiple oculocutaneous malignancies and complications. Indian J Surg Oncol 2014, 5(2):120-124.

  37. Gandini S, Palli D, Spadola G, Bendinelli B, Cocorocchio E, Stanganelli I, Miligi L, Masala G, Caini S: Anti-hypertensive drugs and skin cancer risk: a review of the literature and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018, 122:1-9.

  38. Chen P, Chen F, Zhou B: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of dermatological toxicities associated with vemurafenib treatment in patients with melanoma. Clin Exp Dermatol 2019, 44(3):243-251.

  39. Tang H, Fu S, Zhai S, Song Y, Asgari MM, Han J: Use of antihypertensive drugs and risk of keratinocyte carcinoma: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2018, 27(3):279-288.

  40. Rogers HW, Weinstock MA, Harris AR, Hinckley MR, Feldman SR, Fleischer AB, Coldiron BM: Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States, 2006. Arch Dermatol 2010, 146(3):283-287.

  41. Lomas A, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath-Hextall F: A systematic review of worldwide incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Br J Dermatol 2012, 166(5):1069-1080.

  42. Rubin AI, Chen EH, Ratner D: Basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2005, 353(21):2262-2269.

  43. Kuo KY, Batra P, Cho HG, Li S, Chahal HS, Rieger KE, Tang JY, Sarin KY: Correlates of multiple basal cell carcinoma in a retrospective cohort study: Sex, histologic subtypes, and anatomic distribution. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017, 77(2):233-234 e232.

  44. Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Shakhzadova OV (eds.): State of oncological care for the population of Russia in 2022. Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute − branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health; 2023.

  45. Kaprin AD, Starinsky VV, Shakhzadova OV, Lisichnikova IV (eds.): Malignant neoplasms in Russia in 2022 (morbidity and mortality) Moscow: P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute − branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health; 2023.

  46. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision [http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2016/en]

  47. Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (eds.): TNM classification of malignant tumors, 8th edn. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2017.

  48. Shmults CD, Blitzblau R, Aasi SA, Alam M, Andersen JS, Bordeaux J, Bowen GM, Carson W, Chen P-L, Contreras CM et al: NCCN Guidelienes Version 1.2020. Squamous Cell Skin Cancer. In.: NCCN; 2019.

  49. Thompson AK, Kelley BF, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Baum CL: Risk Factors for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Recurrence, Metastasis, and Disease-Specific Death: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol 2016, 152(4):419-428.

  50. Swanson NA: Mohs surgery. Technique, indications, applications, and the future. Arch Dermatol 1983, 119(9):761-773.

  51. Prieto-Granada C, Rodriguez-Waitkus P: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and related entities: Epidemiology, clinical and histological features, and basic science overview. Curr Probl Cancer 2015, 39(4):206-215.

  52. Burton KA, Ashack KA, Khachemoune A: Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Review of High-Risk and Metastatic Disease. Am J Clin Dermatol 2016, 17(5):491-508.

  53. Kwiek B, Schwartz RA: Keratoacanthoma (KA): An update and review. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016, 74(6):1220-1233.

  54. Oshyvalova OO, Kaliuzhna LD, Kropelnytskyi VO: Clinical forms of actinic keratosis and levels of dysplasia of the epidermis. Wiad Lek 2017, 70(6 pt 1):1072-1078.

  55. Parekh V, Seykora JT: Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Lab Med 2017, 37(3):503-525.

  56. Que SKT, Zwald FO, Schmults CD: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and staging. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018, 78(2):237-247.

  57. deShazo R, Soltani-Arabshahi R, Krishnasamy S, Langley RG, Kalia S, Stahle M, Langholff W, Goyal K, Fakharzadeh S, Galindo C et al: Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Risk Among Patients in the Psoriasis Longitudinal Assessment and Registry (PSOLAR). J Drugs Dermatol 2019, 18(10):1059-1060.

  58. Elnahas S, Olson MT, Kang P, Panchanathan R, Masuda T, Walia R, Zeitouni NC, Smith MA, Bremner RM: Factors associated with skin cancer in lung transplant recipients: A single-center experience. Clin Transplant 2019:e13718.

  59. Huang JT, Coughlin CC, Hawryluk EB, Hook K, Humphrey SR, Kruse L, Lawley L, Al-Sayegh H, London WB, Marghoob A et al: Risk Factors and Outcomes of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer in Children and Young Adults. J Pediatr 2019, 211:152-158.

  60. Oliveira WRP, Tirico M, Souza AAV, Codarin FR, Silva LLC, Festa Neto C: Skin lesions in organ transplant recipients: a study of 177 consecutive Brazilian patients. Int J Dermatol 2019, 58(4):440-448.

  61. Oh CC, Lee HY, Tan BK, Assam PN, Kee TYS, Pang SM: Dermatological conditions seen in renal transplant recipients in a Singapore tertiary hospital. Singapore Med J 2018, 59(10):519-523.

  62. Collins L, Quinn A, Stasko T: Skin Cancer and Immunosuppression. Dermatol Clin 2019, 37(1):83-94.

  63. Lee CT, Lehrer EJ, Aphale A, Lango M, Galloway TJ, Zaorsky NG: Surgical excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, external-beam radiotherapy, or brachytherapy for indolent skin cancer: An international meta-analysis of 58 studies with 21,000 patients. Cancer 2019, 125(20):3582-3594.

  64. Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Chuchu N, Matin RN, Wong KY, Aldridge RB, Durack A, Gulati A, Chan SA, Johnston L et al: Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018, 12:CD011901.

  65. Dinnes J, Deeks JJ, Grainge MJ, Chuchu N, Ferrante di Ruffano L, Matin RN, Thomson DR, Wong KY, Aldridge RB, Abbott R et al: Visual inspection for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2018(12).

  66. Grange F: [Multiple primary melanoma and familial melanoma. Risk evaluation and screening tests. How to evaluate the risk of developing a second melanoma? In what family? Should screening methods be implemented? Which ones and why?]. Ann Dermatol Venereol 1995, 122(5):365-371.

  67. Claeson M, Holmstrom P, Hallberg S, Gillstedt M, Gonzalez H, Wennberg AM, Paoli J: Multiple Primary Melanomas: A Common Occurrence in Western Sweden. Acta Derm Venereol 2016.

  68. Moore MM, Geller AC, Warton EM, Schwalbe J, Asgari MM: Multiple primary melanomas among 16,570 patients with melanoma diagnosed at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 1996 to 2011. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015, 73(4):630-636.

  69. Force USPST, Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Davidson KW, Ebell M, Epling JW, Jr., Garcia FA, Gillman MW, Kemper AR et al: Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2016, 316(4):429-435.

  70. Lallas A, Argenziano G, Zendri E, Moscarella E, Longo C, Grenzi L, Pellacani G, Zalaudek I: Update on non-melanoma skin cancer and the value of dermoscopy in its diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2013, 13(5):541-558.

  71. Wernli KJ, Henrikson NB, Morrison CC, Nguyen M, Pocobelli G, Blasi PR: Screening for Skin Cancer in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2016, 316(4):436-447.

  72. Lallas A, Pyne J, Kyrgidis A, Andreani S, Argenziano G, Cavaller A, Giacomel J, Longo C, Malvestiti A, Moscarella E et al: The clinical and dermoscopic features of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma depend on the histopathological grade of differentiation. Br J Dermatol 2015, 172(5):1308-1315.

  73. Manfredini M, Longo C, Ferrari B, Piana S, Benati E, Casari A, Pellacani G, Moscarella E: Dermoscopic and reflectance confocal microscopy features of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017, 31(11):1828-1833.

  74. Weber P, Tschandl P, Sinz C, Kittler H: Dermatoscopy of Neoplastic Skin Lesions: Recent Advances, Updates, and Revisions. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2018, 19(11):56.

  75. Payapvipapong K, Tanaka M: Dermoscopic classification of Bowen"s disease. Australas J Dermatol 2015, 56(1):32-35.

  76. Ferrante di Ruffano L, Dinnes J, Chuchu N, Bayliss SE, Takwoingi Y, Davenport C, Matin RN, O"Sullivan C, Roskell D, Deeks JJ et al: Exfoliative cytology for diagnosing basal cell carcinoma and other skin cancers in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018, 12:CD013187.

  77. Brovkina AF: Ophthalmic Oncology. Moscow: Meditsina; 2002.

  78. Brovkina AF, Panova IE, Saakyan SV: Ophthalmic oncology: new developments over the past two decades. Vestnik Oftal'mologii 2014, 130(6):13-19.

  79. Valsky VV, Borodin YuI, Saakyan SV: Efficacy of proton therapy for epithelial malignant tumors of the ocular adnexa using a reduced total focal dose. Head and Neck Tumors 2016, 1(6):47-48.

  80. Vazhenina DA, Vasilyev SA, Dudnik SN: Recurrent basal cell carcinoma of the eyelid skin (clinical course and treatment features). Russian Medical Journal 2016, 11:36-43.

  81. Engibaryan MA, Pustovaya IV, Ulyanova YuV: Primary autoplasty in the surgical treatment of tumors of the inner canthus of the eye. Izvestiya VUZ Severo-Kavkazsky Region Natural Sciences 2011:34-36.

  82. Panova IE, Vasilyev SA, Semyonov LE: Recurrent basal cell carcinoma of the eyelids. Klinicheskaya oftal'mologiya 2006, 7(1):11-14.

  83. Walsh MF, Chang VY, Kohlmann WK, Scott HS, Cunniff C, Bourdeaut F, Molenaar JJ, Porter CC, Sandlund JT, Plon SE et al: Recommendations for Childhood Cancer Screening and Surveillance in DNA Repair Disorders. Clin Cancer Res 2017, 23(11):e23-e31.

  84. Tofuku Y, Nobeyama Y, Kamide R, Moriwaki S, Nakagawa H: Xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group F: Report of a case and review of Japanese patients. J Dermatol 2015, 42(9):897-899.

  85. Pace P: [Eugenic consultation]. Minerva Med 1974, 65(90):4754-4760.

  86. Kraemer KH, DiGiovanna JJ: Xeroderma Pigmentosum. In: GeneReviews((R)). edn. Edited by Adam MP, Ardinger HH, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Bean LJH, Stephens K, Amemiya A. Seattle (WA); 1993.

  87. Naik SM, Shenoy AM, Nanjundappa A, Halkud R, Chavan P, Sidappa K, Gupta S: Cutaneous malignancies in xeroderma pigmentosum: earlier management improves survival. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013, 65(2):162-167.

  88. Christen-Zaech S, Imoto K, Khan SG, Oh KS, Tamura D, Digiovanna JJ, Boyle J, Patronas NJ, Schiffmann R, Kraemer KH et al: Unexpected occurrence of xeroderma pigmentosum in an uncle and nephew. Arch Dermatol 2009, 145(11):1285-1291.

  89. Poblete-Gutierrez P, Burgdorf WH, Has C, Berneburg M, Frank J: [Hereditary photodermatoses]. Hautarzt 2006, 57(12):1067-1082.

  90. Maeda T, Sato K, Minami H, Taguchi H, Yoshikawa K: PCR-RFLP analysis as an aid to genetic counseling of families of Japanese patients with group A xeroderma pigmentosum. J Invest Dermatol 1997, 109(3):306-309.

  91. Yang Y, Ding B, Wang K, Bu D, Tu P, Zhu X: DNA-based prenatal diagnosis in a Chinese family with xeroderma pigmentosum group A. Br J Dermatol 2004, 150(6):1190-1193.

  92. Itin PH, Fistarol SK: [Genetic counseling and DNA testing in patients with increased risks for malignant melanoma]. Ther Umsch 2003, 60(8):469-472.

  93. Oda T, Sue M, Sasaki Y, Ogura I: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in oral and maxillofacial lesions: preliminary study on diagnostic ability of apparent diffusion coefficient maps. Oral Radiol 2018, 34(3):224-228.

  94. Mendenhall WM, Ferlito A, Takes RP, Bradford CR, Corry J, Fagan JJ, Rinaldo A, Strojan P, Rodrigo JP: Cutaneous head and neck basal and squamous cell carcinomas with perineural invasion. Oral Oncol 2012, 48(10):918-922.

  95. Balamucki CJ, DeJesus R, Galloway TJ, Mancuso AA, Amdur RJ, Morris CG, Kirwan JM, Mendenhall WM: Impact of radiographic findings on for prognosis skin cancer with perineural invasion. Am J Clin Oncol 2015, 38(3):248-251.

  96. Newlands C, Currie R, Memon A, Whitaker S, Woolford T: Non-melanoma skin cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol 2016, 130(S2):S125-S132.

  97. Marrazzo G, Thorpe R, Condie D, Pinho MC, Srivastava D: Clinical and Pathologic Factors Predictive of Positive Radiologic Findings in High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 2015, 41(12):1405-1410.

  98. Ruiz ES, Karia PS, Morgan FC, Schmults CD: The positive impact of radiologic imaging on high-stage cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma management. J Am Acad Dermatol 2017, 76(2):217-225.

  99. Gandhi MR, Panizza B, Kennedy D: Detecting and defining the anatomic extent of large nerve perineural spread of malignancy: comparing "targeted" MRI with the histologic findings following surgery. Head Neck 2011, 33(4):469-475.

  100. Williams LS, Mancuso AA, Mendenhall WM: Perineural spread of cutaneous squamous and basal cell carcinoma: CT and MR detection and its impact on patient management and prognosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001, 49(4):1061-1069.

  101. Nemzek WR, Hecht S, Gandour-Edwards R, Donald P, McKennan K: Perineural spread of head and neck tumors: how accurate is MR imaging? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998, 19(4):701-706.

  102. Buchwald HJ, Muller A, Kampmeier J, Lang GK: [Optical coherence tomography versus ultrasound biomicroscopy of conjunctival and eyelid lesions]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2003, 220(12):822-829.

  103. Dreno B, Thompson JF, Smithers BM, Santinami M, Jouary T, Gutzmer R, Levchenko E, Rutkowski P, Grob JJ, Korovin S et al: MAGE-A3 immunotherapeutic as adjuvant therapy for patients with resected, MAGE-A3-positive, stage III melanoma (DERMA): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet Oncology 2018, 19(7):916-929.

  104. Bichakjian C, Aasi SZ, Alam M, Andersen JS, Blitzblau R, Bordeaux J, Bowen GM, Chen PL, Contreras CM, Mackenzie D et al: Basal cell skin cancer. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Version 1.2019 - August 31.2018. 2019:46.

  105. Brodland DG, Zitelli JA: Surgical margins for excision of primary cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992, 27(2 Pt 1):241-248.

  106. Baker NJ, Webb AA, Macpherson D: Surgical management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001, 39(2):87-90.

  107. Griffiths RW, Feeley K, Suvarna SK: Audit of clinical and histological prognostic factors in primary invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: assessment in a minimum 5 year follow-up study after conventional excisional surgery. Br J Plast Surg 2002, 55(4):287-292.

  108. Ang P, Tan AW, Goh CL: Comparison of completely versus incompletely excised cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004, 33(1):68-70.

  109. Nemet AY, Deckel Y, Martin PA, Kourt G, Chilov M, Sharma V, Benger R: Management of periocular basal and squamous cell carcinoma: a series of 485 cases. Am J Ophthalmol 2006, 142(2):293-297.

  110. Mourouzis C, Boynton A, Grant J, Umar T, Wilson A, Macpheson D, Pratt C: Cutaneous head and neck SCCs and risk of nodal metastasis - UK experience. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009, 37(8):443-447.

  111. Seretis K, Thomaidis V, Karpouzis A, Tamiolakis D, Tsamis I: Epidemiology of surgical treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer of the head and neck in Greece. Dermatol Surg 2010, 36(1):15-22.

  112. van der Eerden PA, Prins ME, Lohuis PJ, Balm FA, Vuyk HD: Eighteen years of experience in Mohs micrographic surgery and conventional excision for nonmelanoma skin cancer treated by a single facial plastic surgeon and pathologist. Laryngoscope 2010, 120(12):2378-2384.

  113. Maciburko SJ, Townley WA, Hollowood K, Giele HP: Skin cancers of the hand: a series of 541 malignancies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012, 129(6):1329-1336.

  114. Chren MM, Linos E, Torres JS, Stuart SE, Parvataneni R, Boscardin WJ: Tumor recurrence 5 years after treatment of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol 2013, 133(5):1188-1196.

  115. Schell AE, Russell MA, Park SS: Suggested excisional margins for cutaneous malignant lesions based on Mohs micrographic surgery. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013, 15(5):337-343.

  116. Jenkins G, Smith AB, Kanatas AN, Houghton DR, Telfer MR: Anatomical restrictions in the surgical excision of scalp squamous cell carcinomas: does this affect local recurrence and regional nodal metastases? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014, 43(2):142-146.

  117. Brinkman JN, Hajder E, van der Holt B, Den Bakker MA, Hovius SE, Mureau MA: The Effect of Differentiation Grade of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma on Excision Margins, Local Recurrence, Metastasis, and Patient Survival: A Retrospective Follow-Up Study. Ann Plast Surg 2015, 75(3):323-326.

  118. Pugliano-Mauro M, Goldman G: Mohs surgery is effective for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 2010, 36(10):1544-1553.

  119. Batra RS, Kelley LC: Predictors of extensive subclinical spread in nonmelanoma skin cancer treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. Arch Dermatol 2002, 138(8):1043-1051.

  120. Leibovitch I, Huilgol SC, Selva D, Hill D, Richards S, Paver R: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery in Australia I. Experience over 10 years. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005, 53(2):253-260.

  121. Bogdanov-Berezovsky A, Cohen AD, Glesinger R, Cagnano E, Rosenberg L: Risk factors for incomplete excision of squamous cell carcinomas. J Dermatolog Treat 2005, 16(5-6):341-344.

  122. Khan AA, Potter M, Cubitt JJ, Khoda BJ, Smith J, Wright EH, Scerri G, Crick A, Cassell OC, Budny PG: Guidelines for the excision of cutaneous squamous cell cancers in the United Kingdom: the best cut is the deepest. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013, 66(4):467-471.

  123. Fraunfelder FT, Zacarian SA, Limmer BL, Wingfield D: Cryosurgery for malignancies of the eyelid. Ophthalmology 1980, 87(6):461-465.

  124. Zacarian SA: Cryosurgery of cutaneous carcinomas. An 18-year study of 3,022 patients with 4,228 carcinomas. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983, 9(6):947-956.

  125. Holt PJ: Cryotherapy for skin cancer: results over a 5-year period using liquid nitrogen spray cryosurgery. Br J Dermatol 1988, 119(2):231-240.

  126. Kuflik EG, Gage AA: The five-year cure rate achieved by cryosurgery for skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol 1991, 24(6 Pt 1):1002-1004.

  127. Morton CA, Whitehurst C, Moseley H, McColl JH, Moore JV, Mackie RM: Comparison of photodynamic therapy with cryotherapy in the treatment of Bowen"s disease. Br J Dermatol 1996, 135(5):766-771.

  128. Ahmed I, Berth-Jones J, Charles-Holmes S, O"Callaghan CJ, Ilchyshyn A: Comparison of cryotherapy with curettage in the treatment of Bowen"s disease: a prospective study. Br J Dermatol 2000, 143(4):759-766.

  129. Morton CA, Whitehurst C, Moore JV, MacKie RM: Comparison of red and green light in the treatment of Bowen"s disease by photodynamic therapy. Br J Dermatol 2000, 143(4):767-772.

  130. Morton CA, Whitehurst C, McColl JH, Moore JV, MacKie RM: Photodynamic therapy for large or multiple patches of Bowen disease and basal cell carcinoma. Arch Dermatol 2001, 137(3):319-324.

  131. Salim A, Leman JA, McColl JH, Chapman R, Morton CA: Randomized comparison of photodynamic therapy with topical 5-fluorouracil in Bowen"s disease. Br J Dermatol 2003, 148(3):539-543.

  132. Morton C, Horn M, Leman J, Tack B, Bedane C, Tjioe M, Ibbotson S, Khemis A, Wolf P: Comparison of topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy with cryotherapy or Fluorouracil for treatment of squamous cell carcinoma in situ: Results of a multicenter randomized trial. Arch Dermatol 2006, 142(6):729-735.

  133. Patel GK, Goodwin R, Chawla M, Laidler P, Price PE, Finlay AY, Motley RJ: Imiquimod 5% cream monotherapy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in situ (Bowen"s disease): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006, 54(6):1025-1032.

  134. Peris K, Micantonio T, Fargnoli MC, Lozzi GP, Chimenti S: Imiquimod 5% cream in the treatment of Bowen"s disease and invasive squamous cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006, 55(2):324-327.

  135. Hansen JP, Drake AL, Walling HW: Bowen"s Disease: a four-year retrospective review of epidemiology and treatment at a university center. Dermatol Surg 2008, 34(7):878-883.

  136. Warshauer E, Warshauer BL: Clearance of basal cell and superficial squamous cell carcinomas after imiquimod therapy. J Drugs Dermatol 2008, 7(5):447-451.

  137. Lindemalm-Lundstam B, Dalenback J: Prospective follow-up after curettage-cryosurgery for scalp and face skin cancers. Br J Dermatol 2009, 161(3):568-576.

  138. Love WE, Bernhard JD, Bordeaux JS: Topical imiquimod or fluorouracil therapy for basal and squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol 2009, 145(12):1431-1438.

  139. Peikert JM: Prospective trial of curettage and cryosurgery in the management of non-facial, superficial, and minimally invasive basal and squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol 2011, 50(9):1135-1138.

  140. Overmark M, Koskenmies S, Pitkanen S: A Retrospective Study of Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma In situ. Acta Derm Venereol 2016, 96(1):64-67.

  141. Varma S, Wilson H, Kurwa HA, Gambles B, Charman C, Pearse AD, Taylor D, Anstey AV: Bowen"s disease, solar keratoses and superficial basal cell carcinomas treated by photodynamic therapy using a large-field incoherent light source. Br J Dermatol 2001, 144(3):567-574.

  142. Lui H, Hobbs L, Tope WD, Lee PK, Elmets C, Provost N, Chan A, Neyndorff H, Su XY, Jain H et al: Photodynamic therapy of multiple nonmelanoma skin cancers with verteporfin and red light-emitting diodes: two-year results evaluating tumor response and cosmetic outcomes. Arch Dermatol 2004, 140(1):26-32.

  143. Haddad R, Nesher E, Weiss J, Skornick Y, Kashtan H: Photodynamic therapy for Bowen"s disease and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2004, 1(3):225-230.

  144. Calzavara-Pinton PG, Venturini M, Sala R, Capezzera R, Parrinello G, Specchia C, Zane C: Methylaminolaevulinate-based photodynamic therapy of Bowen"s disease and squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 2008, 159(1):137-144.

  145. Ko DY, Kim KH, Song KH: A randomized trial comparing methyl aminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy with and without Er:YAG ablative fractional laser treatment in Asian patients with lower extremity Bowen disease: results from a 12-month follow-up. Br J Dermatol 2014, 170(1):165-172.

  146. Bath-Hextall FJ, Matin RN, Wilkinson D, Leonardi-Bee J: Interventions for cutaneous Bowen"s disease. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2013(6):CD007281.

  147. Lansbury L, Bath-Hextall F, Perkins W, Stanton W, Leonardi-Bee J: Interventions for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: systematic review and pooled analysis of observational studies. BMJ 2013, 347:f6153.

  148. Honeycutt WM, Jansen GT: Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Arch Dermatol 1973, 108(5):670-672.

  149. Shiffman NJ: Squamous cell carcinomas of the skin of the pinna. Can J Surg 1975, 18(3):279-283.

  150. Mendenhall WM, Amdur RJ, Hinerman RW, Cognetta AB, Mendenhall NP: Radiotherapy for cutaneous squamous and basal cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Laryngoscope 2009, 119(10):1994-1999.

  151. Hernandez-Machin B, Borrego L, Gil-Garcia M, Hernandez BH: Office-based radiation therapy for cutaneous carcinoma: evaluation of 710 treatments. Int J Dermatol 2007, 46(5):453-459.

  152. Veness MJ, Delishaj D, Barnes EA, Bezugly A, Rembielak A: Current Role of Radiotherapy in Non-melanoma Skin Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2019, 31(11):749-758.

  153. Wang X, Wang X, Xiang Z, Zeng Y, Liu F, Shao B, He T, Ma J, Yu S, Liu L: The Clinical Application of 3D-Printed Boluses in Superficial Tumor Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021, 11:698773.

  154. Endarko E, Aisyah S, Carina CCC, Nazara T, Sekartaji G, Nainggolan A: Evaluation of Dosimetric Properties of Handmade Bolus for Megavoltage Electron and Photon Radiation Therapy. J Biomed Phys Eng 2021, 11(6):735-746.

  155. Vyas V, Palmer L, Mudge R, Jiang R, Fleck A, Schaly B, Osei E, Charland P: On bolus for megavoltage photon and electron radiation therapy. Med Dosim 2013, 38(3):268-273.

  156. Grossi Marconi D, da Costa Resende B, Rauber E, de Cassia Soares P, Fernandes JMJ, Mehta N, Lopes Carvalho A, Kupelian PA, Chen A: Head and Neck Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Treated By Superficial X-Ray Therapy: An Analysis of 1021 Cases. PLoS One 2016, 11(7):e0156544.

  157. Tsao MN, Tsang RW, Liu FF, Panzarella T, Rotstein L: Radiotherapy management for squamous cell carcinoma of the nasal skin: the Princess Margaret Hospital experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002, 52(4):973-979.

  158. Abbatucci JS, Boulier N, Laforge T, Lozier JC: Radiation therapy of skin carcinomas: results of a hypofractionated irradiation schedule in 675 cases followed more than 2 years. Radiother Oncol 1989, 14(2):113-119.

  159. van Hezewijk M, Creutzberg CL, Putter H, Chin A, Schneider I, Hoogeveen M, Willemze R, Marijnen CA: Efficacy of a hypofractionated schedule in electron beam radiotherapy for epithelial skin cancer: Analysis of 434 cases. Radiother Oncol 2010, 95(2):245-249.

  160. Gunaratne DA, Veness MJ: Efficacy of hypofractionated radiotherapy in patients with non-melanoma skin cancer: Results of a systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2018, 62(3):401-411.

  161. Zaorsky NG, Lee CT, Zhang E, Keith SW, Galloway TJ: Hypofractionated radiation therapy for basal and squamous cell skin cancer: A meta-analysis. Radiother Oncol 2017, 125(1):13-20.

  162. Ferro M, Deodato F, Macchia G, Gentileschi S, Cilla S, Torre G, Padula GD, Nuzzo M, Massaccesi M, Valentini V et al: Short-course radiotherapy in elderly patients with early stage non-melanoma skin cancer: a phase II study. Cancer Invest 2015, 33(2):34-38.

  163. Rishi A, Hui Huang S, O"Sullivan B, Goldstein DP, Lu L, Ringash J, Waldron J, Wells W, Sun A, Hope A et al: Outcome following radiotherapy for head and neck basal cell carcinoma with "aggressive" features. Oral Oncol 2017, 72:157-164.

  164. Kwan W, Wilson D, Moravan V: Radiotherapy for locally advanced basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2004, 60(2):406-411.

  165. Khan L, Choo R, Breen D, Assaad D, Fialkov J, Antonyshyn O, McKenzie D, Woo T, Zhang L, Barnes E: Recommendations for CTV margins in radiotherapy planning for non melanoma skin cancer. Radiother Oncol 2012, 104(2):263-266.

  166. Clark C, Bryden A, Dawe R, Moseley H, Ferguson J, Ibbotson SH: Topical 5-aminolaevulinic acid photodynamic therapy for cutaneous lesions: outcome and comparison of light sources. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2003, 19(3):134-141.

  167. Morton CA, Szeimies RM, Basset-Seguin N, Calzavara-Pinton PG, Gilaberte Y, Haedersdal M, Hofbauer GFL, Hunger RE, Karrer S, Piaserico S et al: European Dermatology Forum guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy 2019 Part 2: emerging indications - field cancerization, photorejuvenation and inflammatory/infective dermatoses. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020, 34(1):17-29.

  168. Morton CA, Szeimies RM, Basset-Seguin N, Calzavara-Pinton P, Gilaberte Y, Haedersdal M, Hofbauer GFL, Hunger RE, Karrer S, Piaserico S et al: European Dermatology Forum guidelines on topical photodynamic therapy 2019 Part 1: treatment delivery and established indications - actinic keratoses, Bowen"s disease and basal cell carcinomas. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2019, 33(12):2225-2238.

  169. Antonetti P, Pellegrini C, Caponio C, Bruni M, Dragone L, Mastrangelo M, Esposito M, Fargnoli MC: Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Bowen"s Disease: A Review on Efficacy, Non-Invasive Treatment Monitoring, Tolerability, and Cosmetic Outcome. Biomedicines 2024, 12(4).

  170. Xue WL, Ruan JQ, Liu HY, He HX: Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Bowen"s Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Dermatology 2022, 238(3):542-550.

  171. Zhong S, Zhang R, Mei X, Wang L: Efficacy of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of Bowen"s disease: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2020, 32:102037.

  172. Safar R, Alkhars A, Tallegas M, Korsaga-Some N, Machet L: Successful Treatment for Extensive Bowen"s Disease using Daylight-mediated Photodynamic Therapy. Acta Derm Venereol 2019, 99(7):701-702.

  173. Lopez N, Meyer-Gonzalez T, Herrera-Acosta E, Bosch R, Castillo R, Herrera E: Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of extensive Bowen"s disease. J Dermatolog Treat 2012, 23(6):428-430.

  174. Tserkovsky DA, Mazurenko AN, Petrovskaya NA, Artemyeva TP: Photodynamic therapy of basal cell skin cancer with Photolon photosensitizer. Biomedical Photonics 2017, 6(1):12-19.

  175. Chan AL, Juarez M, Allen R, Volz W, Albertson T: Pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of mono-L-aspartyl chlorin e6 (NPe6) photodynamic therapy in adult patients with primary or secondary cancer of the skin and mucosal surfaces. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2005, 21(2):72-78.

  176. Kochneva EV, Filonenko EV, Vakulovskaya EG, Scherbakova EG, Seliverstov OV, Markichev NA, Reshetnickov AV: Photosensitizer Radachlorin(R): Skin cancer PDT phase II clinical trials. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther 2010, 7(4):258-267.

  177. Dubensky VV, Dubensky VV, Nekrasova EG, Muravyova ES: Erythroplasia of Queyrat: modern aspects of diagnosis and treatment. Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases 2020, 23(1):4-11.

  178. Kaprin AD, Ivanova-Radkevich VI, Urlova AN, Asratov AT, Gushchina YuSh, Libo L, Xiaojun C, Filonenko EV: Capabilities of photodynamic therapy in erythroplasia of Queyrat. Biomedical Photonics, 2020, 9(1):34-41.

  179. Panaseykin YA, Kapinus VN, Filonenko EV, Polkin VV, Sevrukov FE, Smirnova MA, Isaev PA, Ivanov SA, Kaprin AD: Photodynamic therapy in treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of oral cavity with chlorine e6 photosensitizer with long-term follow up. Biomedical Photonics 2024, 13(1):28-38.

  180. Yaroslavtseva-Isaeva EV, Kaplan MA, Kapinus VN, Spichenkova IS, Shubina AM, Goranskaya EV: Photodynamic therapy in standalone and combined treatment of locally advanced basal cell skin cancer. Photodynamic therapy and photodiagnostics. Biomedical Photonics 2012, 1(1):6-11.

  181. Matveeva OV: Photodynamic therapy of recurrent basal cell carcinoma of the scalp skin following radiation therapy Biomedical Photonics 2016, 5(2):38-40.

  182. Rosen T, Harting M, Gibson M: Treatment of Bowen"s disease with topical 5% imiquimod cream: retrospective study. Dermatol Surg 2007, 33(4):427-431; discussion 431-422.

  183. Ross AS, Schmults CD: Sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of the English literature. Dermatol Surg 2006, 32(11):1309-1321.

  184. Renzi C, Caggiati A, Mannooranparampil TJ, Passarelli F, Tartaglione G, Pennasilico GM, Cecconi S, Potenza C, Pasquini P: Sentinel lymph node biopsy for high risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: case series and review of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007, 33(3):364-369.

  185. Ahmed MM, Moore BA, Schmalbach CE: Utility of head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma sentinel node biopsy: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014, 150(2):180-187.

  186. Fukushima S, Masuguchi S, Igata T, Harada M, Aoi J, Miyashita A, Nakahara S, Inoue Y, Jinnin M, Shiraishi S et al: Evaluation of sentinel node biopsy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Dermatol 2014, 41(6):539-541.

  187. Schmitt AR, Brewer JD, Bordeaux JS, Baum CL: Staging for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma as a predictor of sentinel lymph node biopsy results: meta-analysis of American Joint Committee on Cancer criteria and a proposed alternative system. JAMA Dermatol 2014, 150(1):19-24.

  188. Takahashi A, Imafuku S, Nakayama J, Nakaura J, Ito K, Shibayama Y: Sentinel node biopsy for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014, 40(10):1256-1262.

  189. Allen JE, Stolle LB: Utility of sentinel node biopsy in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015, 41(2):197-200.

  190. Krediet JT, Beyer M, Lenz K, Ulrich C, Lange-Asschenfeldt B, Stockfleth E, Terhorst D: Sentinel lymph node biopsy and risk factors for predicting metastasis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol 2015, 172(4):1029-1036.

  191. Durham AB, Lowe L, Malloy KM, McHugh JB, Bradford CR, Chubb H, Johnson TM, McLean SA: Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma on the Head and Neck. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016, 142(12):1171-1176.

  192. Gore SM, Shaw D, Martin RC, Kelder W, Roth K, Uren R, Gao K, Davies S, Ashford BG, Ngo Q et al: Prospective study of sentinel node biopsy for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2016, 38 Suppl 1:E884-889.

  193. Maruyama H, Tanaka R, Fujisawa Y, Nakamura Y, Ito S, Fujimoto M: Availability of sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. J Dermatol 2017, 44(4):431-437.

  194. Hauschild A, Breuninger H, Kaufmann R, Kortmann RD, Klein M, Werner J, Reifenberger J, Dirschka T, Garbe C: Brief S2k guidelines--Basal cell carcinoma of the skin. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2013, 11 Suppl 3:10-15, 11-16.

  195. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL, Jr.: Mohs surgery is the treatment of choice for recurrent (previously treated) basal cell carcinoma. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1989, 15(4):424-431.

  196. Rowe DE, Carroll RJ, Day CL, Jr.: Long-term recurrence rates in previously untreated (primary) basal cell carcinoma: implications for patient follow-up. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1989, 15(3):315-328.

  197. Petit JY, Avril MF, Margulis A, Chassagne D, Gerbaulet A, Duvillard P, Auperin A, Rietjens M: Evaluation of cosmetic results of a randomized trial comparing surgery and radiotherapy in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma of the face. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000, 105(7):2544-2551.

  198. Avril MF, Auperin A, Margulis A, Gerbaulet A, Duvillard P, Benhamou E, Guillaume JC, Chalon R, Petit JY, Sancho-Garnier H et al: Basal cell carcinoma of the face: surgery or radiotherapy? Results of a randomized study. Br J Cancer 1997, 76(1):100-106.

  199. Dundar Y, Cannon RB, Hunt JP, Monroe M, Suneja G, Hitchcock YJ: Radiotherapy regimens in patients with nonmelanoma head and neck skin cancers. Int J Dermatol 2018, 57(4):441-448.

  200. Jambusaria-Pahlajani A, Miller CJ, Quon H, Smith N, Klein RQ, Schmults CD: Surgical monotherapy versus surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review of outcomes. Dermatol Surg 2009, 35(4):574-585.

  201. Veness MJ, Morgan GJ, Palme CE, Gebski V: Surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to lymph nodes: combined treatment should be considered best practice. Laryngoscope 2005, 115(5):870-875.

  202. Wray J, Amdur RJ, Morris CG, Werning J, Mendenhall WM: Efficacy of elective nodal irradiation in skin squamous cell carcinoma of the face, ears, and scalp. Radiat Oncol 2015, 10:199.

  203. Timofeev LV, Saakyan SV, Voloshin SV, Arkhipov AYu: Applicators for ophthalmic oncology. Strontium-90 + Yttrium-90. Moscow; 2019.

  204. Chopdar A: Carbon-dioxide laser treatment of eye lid lesions. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K 1985, 104 ( Pt 2):176-180.

  205. Valsky VV: Large-fraction brachytherapy of malignant conjunctival tumors. In: Advances and Prospects of Ophthalmic Oncology. edn. Moscow; 2001: 98-100.

  206. Brovkina AF: Radiation therapy in the treatment of eye tumors. Klinicheskaya Oftal'mologiya 2003, 4(1):15-19.

  207. Timofeev LV: Physical, technical, some radiobiological and medical aspects of contact radiation (beta ̶ ) therapy. Moscow; 2016.

  208. Timofeev LV: Computational methods of beta radiation dosimetry. Moscow: Vashformat Printing House; 2017.

  209. Laskar S, Gurram L, Laskar SG, Chaudhari S, Khanna N, Upreti R: Superficial ocular malignancies treated with strontium-90 brachytherapy: long term outcomes. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2015, 7(5):369-373.

  210. Lecuona K, Stannard C, Hart G, Rice J, Cook C, Wetter J, Duffield M: The treatment of carcinoma in situ and squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva with fractionated strontium-90 radiation in a population with a high prevalence of HIV. Br J Ophthalmol 2015, 99(9):1158-1161.

  211. Stannard C, Sauerwein W, Maree G, Lecuona K: Radiotherapy for ocular tumours. Eye (Lond) 2013, 27(2):119-127.

  212. Veness MJ, Palme CE, Smith M, Cakir B, Morgan GJ, Kalnins I: Cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes (nonparotid): a better outcome with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. Laryngoscope 2003, 113(10):1827-1833.

  213. Hinerman RW, Indelicato DJ, Amdur RJ, Morris CG, Werning JW, Vaysberg M, Kirwan J, Mendenhall WM: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to parotid-area lymph nodes. Laryngoscope 2008, 118(11):1989-1996.

  214. Jol JA, van Velthuysen ML, Hilgers FJ, Keus RB, Neering H, Balm AJ: Treatment results of regional metastasis from cutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2003, 29(1):81-86.

  215. Audet N, Palme CE, Gullane PJ, Gilbert RW, Brown DH, Irish J, Neligan P: Cutaneous metastatic squamous cell carcinoma to the parotid gland: analysis and outcome. Head Neck 2004, 26(8):727-732.

  216. Khurana VG, Mentis DH, O"Brien CJ, Hurst TL, Stevens GN, Packham NA: Parotid and neck metastases from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg 1995, 170(5):446-450.

  217. O"Brien CJ, McNeil EB, McMahon JD, Pathak I, Lauer CS, Jackson MA: Significance of clinical stage, extent of surgery, and pathologic findings in metastatic cutaneous squamous carcinoma of the parotid gland. Head Neck 2002, 24(5):417-422.

  218. Chua MS, Veness MJ, Morgan G, Shakespeare T, Hehir A, Gebski V, Cakir B, Tiver KW: Parotid lymph-node metastases from cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas: treatment outcome and prognostic factors following surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. Australas Radiol 2002, 46(2):174-179.

  219. Dona E, Veness MJ, Cakir B, Morgan GJ: Metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to the parotid: the role of surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy to achieve best outcome. ANZ J Surg 2003, 73(9):692-696.

  220. Palme CE, O"Brien CJ, Veness MJ, McNeil EB, Bron LP, Morgan GJ: Extent of parotid disease influences outcome in patients with metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003, 129(7):750-753.

  221. Apisarnthanarax S, Dhruva N, Ardeshirpour F, Tepper JE, Shores CG, Rosenman JG, Shockley WW, Hayward MC, Hayes DN: Concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk nonmelanoma skin carcinomas of the head and neck. Int J Surg Oncol 2011, 2011:464829.

  222. Balamucki CJ, Mancuso AA, Amdur RJ, Kirwan JM, Morris CG, Flowers FP, Stoer CB, Cognetta AB, Mendenhall WM: Skin carcinoma of the head and neck with perineural invasion. Am J Otolaryngol 2012, 33(4):447-454.

  223. Maubec E, Helfen S, Scheer-Senyarich I, Boubaya M, Schischmanoff O, Alloux C, Deschamps L, Petrow P, Lopez I, Tibi A et al: CARSKIN: Pembrolizumab as first line therapy in patients with unresectable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017, 35(15_suppl):TPS9596-TPS9596.

  224. Stevenson ML, Wang CQ, Abikhair M, Roudiani N, Felsen D, Krueger JG, Pavlick AC, Carucci JA: Expression of Programmed Cell Death Ligand in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Treatment of Locally Advanced Disease With Pembrolizumab. JAMA Dermatol 2017, 153(4):299-303.

  225. Seiwert TY, Burtness B, Mehra R, Weiss J, Berger R, Eder JP, Heath K, McClanahan T, Lunceford J, Gause C et al: Safety and clinical activity of pembrolizumab for treatment of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-012): an open-label, multicentre, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol 2016, 17(7):956-965.

  226. Deinlein T, Lax SF, Schwarz T, Giuffrida R, Schmid-Zalaudek K, Zalaudek I: Rapid response of metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma to pembrolizumab in a patient with xeroderma pigmentosum: Case report and review of the literature. Eur J Cancer 2017, 83:99-102.

  227. Papadopoulos KP, Johnson ML, Lockhart AC, Moore KN, Falchook GS, Formenti SC, Naing A, Carvajal RD, Rosen LS, Weiss GJ et al: First-In-Human Study of Cemiplimab Alone or In Combination with Radiotherapy and/or Low Dose Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Advanced Malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 2019.

  228. Choi FD, Kraus CN, Elsensohn AN, Carley SK, Lehmer LM, Nguyen RT, Linden KG, Shiu J: Programmed cell death 1 protein and programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitors in the treatment of nonmelanoma skin cancer: A systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019.

  229. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G, Jr., Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, Harrington KJ, Kasper S, Vokes EE, Even C et al: Nivolumab vs investigator"s choice in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: 2-year long-term survival update of CheckMate 141 with analyses by tumor PD-L1 expression. Oral Oncol 2018, 81:45-51.

  230. Markham A, Duggan S: Cemiplimab: First Global Approval. Drugs 2018, 78(17):1841-1846.

  231. Migden MR, Rischin D, Schmults CD, Guminski A, Hauschild A, Lewis KD, Chung CH, Hernandez-Aya L, Lim AM, Chang ALS et al: PD-1 Blockade with Cemiplimab in Advanced Cutaneous Squamous-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018, 379(4):341-351.

  232. Sidaway P: Cemiplimab effective in cutaneous SCC. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2018, 15(8):472.

  233. Ahmed SR, Petersen E, Patel R, Migden MR: Cemiplimab-rwlc as first and only treatment for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2019, 12(10):947-951.

  234. Ali SA, Arman HE, Patel AA, Birhiray RE: Successful Administration of Cemiplimab to a Patient With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Renal Transplantation. J Oncol Pract 2019:JOP1900567.

  235. Burova E, Hermann A, Dai J, Ullman E, Halasz G, Potocky T, Hong S, Liu M, Allbritton O, Woodruff A et al: Preclinical Development of the Anti-LAG-3 Antibody REGN3767: Characterization and Activity in Combination with the Anti-PD-1 Antibody Cemiplimab in Human PD-1xLAG-3-Knockin Mice. Mol Cancer Ther 2019, 18(11):2051-2062.

  236. Hernandez-Guerrero T, Doger B, Moreno V: Cemiplimab for the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Drugs Today (Barc) 2019, 55(8):485-494.

  237. Vanhakendover L, Lebas E, Libon F, Wauters O, Dezfoulian B, Marchal N, Rorive A, Piret P, Quatresooz P, Jacquemin D et al: [Locally advanced and metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with cemiplimab]. Rev Med Liege 2019, 74(7-8):436-440.

  238. Ferris RL, Blumenschein G, Jr., Fayette J, Guigay J, Colevas AD, Licitra L, Harrington K, Kasper S, Vokes EE, Even C et al: Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck. N Engl J Med 2016, 375(19):1856-1867.

  239. Modification of the Dosage Regimen for Nivolumab [http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ApprovedDrugs/ucm520871.htm]

  240. Munhoz RR, Nader-Marta G, de Camargo VP, Queiroz MM, Cury-Martins J, Ricci H, de Mattos MR, de Menezes TAF, Machado GUC, Bertolli E et al: A phase 2 study of first-line nivolumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. Cancer 2022, 128(24):4223-4231.

  241. Maubec E, Boubaya M, Petrow P, Beylot-Barry M, Basset-Seguin N, Deschamps L, Grob JJ, Dreno B, Scheer-Senyarich I, Bloch-Queyrat C et al: Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab As First-Line, Single-Drug Therapy for Patients With Unresectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinomas. J Clin Oncol 2020, 38(26):3051-3061.

  242. Hughes BGM, Munoz-Couselo E, Mortier L, Bratland A, Gutzmer R, Roshdy O, Gonzalez Mendoza R, Schachter J, Arance A, Grange F et al: Pembrolizumab for locally advanced and recurrent/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-629 study): an open-label, nonrandomized, multicenter, phase II trial. Ann Oncol 2021, 32(10):1276-1285.

  243. Guthrie TH, Porubsky ES: Successful systemic chemotherapy of advanced squamous and basal cell carcinoma of the skin with cis-diamminedichloroplatinum III and doxorubicin. Laryngoscope 1982, 92(11):1298-1299.

  244. Guthrie TH, Jr., McElveen LJ, Porubsky ES, Harmon JD: Cisplatin and doxorubicin. An effective chemotherapy combination in the treatment of advanced basal cell and squamous carcinoma of the skin. Cancer 1985, 55(8):1629-1632.

  245. Ikegawa S, Saida T, Obayashi H, Sasaki A, Esumi H, Ikeda S, Kiyohara Y, Hayasaka K, Ishihara K: Cisplatin combination chemotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma and adenoid cystic carcinoma of the skin. J Dermatol 1989, 16(3):227-230.

  246. Khansur T, Kennedy A: Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for advanced locoregional and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Cancer 1991, 67(8):2030-2032.

  247. Adelstein DJ, Lavertu P, Saxton JP, Secic M, Wood BG, Wanamaker JR, Eliachar I, Strome M, Larto MA: Mature results of a phase III randomized trial comparing concurrent chemoradiotherapy with radiation therapy alone in patients with stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer 2000, 88(4):876-883.

  248. Goppner D, Nekwasil S, Franke I, Gollnick H, Leverkus M: Successful combination therapy of a locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the skin with cetuximab and gamma-irradiation. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2010, 8(10):826-828.

  249. DeConti RC: Chemotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Semin Oncol 2012, 39(2):145-149.

  250. Bejar C, Maubec E: Therapy of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2014, 15(2):302-320.

  251. Preneau S, Rio E, Brocard A, Peuvrel L, Nguyen JM, Quereux G, Dreno B: Efficacy of cetuximab in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma. J Dermatolog Treat 2014, 25(5):424-427.

  252. Conen KL, Fischer N, Hofbauer GF, Shafaeddin-Schreve B, Winterhalder R, Rochlitz C, Zippelius A: Cetuximab in metastatic squamous cell cancer of the skin: a Swiss case series. Dermatology 2014, 229(2):97-101.

  253. Foote MC, McGrath M, Guminski A, Hughes BG, Meakin J, Thomson D, Zarate D, Simpson F, Porceddu SV: Phase II study of single-agent panitumumab in patients with incurable cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2014, 25(10):2047-2052.

  254. Tanvetyanon T, Padhya T, McCaffrey J, Kish JA, Deconti RC, Trotti A, Rao NG: Postoperative concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2015, 37(6):840-845.

  255. Nottage MK, Lin C, Hughes BG, Kenny L, Smith DD, Houston K, Francesconi A: Prospective study of definitive chemoradiation in locally or regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Head Neck 2017, 39(4):679-683.

  256. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur RK, Raben D, Baselga J, Spencer SA, Zhu J et al: Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. The Lancet Oncology 2010, 11(1):21-28.

  257. Goldberg H, Tsalik M, Bernstein Z, Haim N: [Cisplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced basal and squamous cell carcinomas]. Harefuah 1994, 127(7-8):217-221, 286.

  258. Muzaffar J, Khushalani NI, Russell JS, Parameswaran J, Kirtane K, Iglesia JDL, Slebos R, Chung CH: A phase II study of capecitabine (Cape) or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with pegylated interferon alpha-2b (Peg-IFNA-2b) in unresectable/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2019, 37(15_suppl):e21020-e21020.

  259. Maubec E, Petrow P, Scheer-Senyarich I, Duvillard P, Lacroix L, Gelly J, Certain A, Duval X, Crickx B, Buffard V et al: Phase II study of cetuximab as first-line single-drug therapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29(25):3419-3426.

  260. Gurney H: How to calculate the dose of chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 2002, 86(8):1297-1302.

  261. de Jongh FE, Verweij J, Loos WJ, de Wit R, de Jonge MJ, Planting AS, Nooter K, Stoter G, Sparreboom A: Body-surface area-based dosing does not increase accuracy of predicting cisplatin exposure. J Clin Oncol 2001, 19(17):3733-3739.

  262. Bossi P, Alberti A, Bergamini C, Resteghini C, Locati LD, Alfieri S, Cavalieri S, Colombo E, Gurizzan C, Lorini L et al: Immunotherapy followed by cetuximab in locally advanced/metastatic (LA/M) cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC): The I-TACKLE trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2022, 40(16_suppl):9520-9520.

  263. Vladimirova LYu, Gladkov OA, Koroleva IA, Rumyantsev AA, Semiglazova TYu, Tryakin AA: Practical guidelines for the prevention and treatment of nausea and vomiting in cancer patients. Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines 2020 10(#3s2).

  264. Bagrova SG, Kopp MV, Kutukova SI, Manzyuk LV, Semiglazova TYu: The use of bone-modifying agents (BMAs) for the prevention and treatment of bone pathology in malignant neoplasms. Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines 2020, 10(3s2-2):35-44.

  265. Sakaeva DD, Orlova RV, Shabaeva MM: TREATMENT OF INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA AND ADMINISTRATION OF COLONY-STIMULATING FACTORS. Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines 2018, 8( #3s2):521-530.

  266. Tkachenko PE, Ivashkin VT, Maevskaya MV: Clinical guidelines for the correction of hepatotoxicity induced by antineoplastic therapy. Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines 2020, 10( #3s2).

  267. Vitsenya MV, Ageev FT, Gilyarov MYu, Ovchinnikov AG, Orlova RV, Poltavskaya MG: Practical guidelines for the correction of cardiovascular toxicity of antineoplastic drug therapy. Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines 2022, 12(#3s2):78-100.

  268. Koroleva IA, Bolotina LV, Gladkov OA, Gorbunova VA, Kruglova LS, Manzyuk LV, Orlova RV: Practical guidelines for the drug treatment of dermatological reactions in patients receiving antineoplastic drug therapy. Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines 2020, 10( #3s2).

  269. Sytov AV, Zuzov SA, Kukosh MYu, Leiderman IN, Potapov AL, Khoteev AZh: Practical guidelines for nutritional support in cancer patients. Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines 2022, 12( #3s2):123-133.

  270. Gromova EG, Biryukova LS, Dzhumabaeva BT, Kurmukov IA: Practical guidelines for the correction of nephrotoxicity of antineoplastic drugs. Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines 2022, 12(#3s2):144-158.

  271. Somonova OV, Antukh EA, Vardanyan AV, Gromova EG, Dolgushin BI, Elizarova AL, Sakaeva DD, Selchuk VYu, Tryakin AA, Cherkasov VA: Practical guidelines for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic complications in cancer patients. Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines 2021, 11( #3s2):145-155.

  272. Buydenok YuV: Guidelines for the treatment of consequences of antineoplastic drug extravasation. Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines 2020, 10(#3s2):156-162.

  273. Protsenko SA, Antimonik NYu, Berstein LM, Zhukova NV, Novik AV, Nosov DA, Petenko NN, Semenova AI, Chubenko VA, Kharkevich GYu et al: Practical guidelines for the management of immune-mediated adverse events. Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines 2020 10(#3s2):168-199.

  274. Silver JK, Baima J: Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013, 92(8):715-727.

  275. Nilsson H, Angeras U, Bock D, Borjesson M, Onerup A, Fagevik Olsen M, Gellerstedt M, Haglind E, Angenete E: Is preoperative physical activity related to post-surgery recovery? A cohort study of patients with breast cancer. BMJ Open 2016, 6(1):e007997.

  276. Siegel GW, Biermann JS, Chugh R, Jacobson JA, Lucas D, Feng M, Chang AC, Smith SR, Wong SL, Hasen J: The multidisciplinary management of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: an essential organizational framework. J Multidiscip Healthc 2015, 8:109-115.

  277. Shehadeh A, El Dahleh M, Salem A, Sarhan Y, Sultan I, Henshaw RM, Aboulafia AJ: Standardization of rehabilitation after limb salvage surgery for sarcomas improves patients" outcome. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther 2013, 6(3-4):105-111.

  278. Cox CL, Montgomery M, Oeffinger KC, Leisenring W, Zeltzer L, Whitton JA, Mertens AC, Hudson MM, Robison LL: Promoting physical activity in childhood cancer survivors: results from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer 2009, 115(3):642-654.

  279. Fallon M, Giusti R, Aielli F, Hoskin P, Rolke R, Sharma M, Ripamonti CI, Committee EG: Management of cancer pain in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 2018, 29(Suppl 4):iv166-iv191.

  280. Abdu Allah AMK, Mohammed KI, Farag AGA, Hagag MM, Essam M, Tayel NR: Interleukin-6 serum level and gene polymorphism in keloid patients. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2019, 65(5):43-48.

  281. Arima J, Huang C, Rosner B, Akaishi S, Ogawa R: Hypertension: a systemic key to understanding local keloid severity. Wound Repair Regen 2015, 23(2):213-221.

  282. Dohi T, Padmanabhan J, Akaishi S, Than PA, Terashima M, Matsumoto NN, Ogawa R, Gurtner GC: The Interplay of Mechanical Stress, Strain, and Stiffness at the Keloid Periphery Correlates with Increased Caveolin-1/ROCK Signaling and Scar Progression. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019, 144(1):58e-67e.

  283. Harn HI, Ogawa R, Hsu CK, Hughes MW, Tang MJ, Chuong CM: The tension biology of wound healing. Exp Dermatol 2019, 28(4):464-471.

  284. Hosalkar H, Greenberg J, Gaugler RL, Garg S, Dormans JP: Abnormal scarring with keloid formation after osteochondroma excision in children with multiple hereditary exostoses. J Pediatr Orthop 2007, 27(3):333-337.

  285. Kim HD, Hwang SM, Lim KR, Jung YH, Ahn SM, Kim Song J: Recurrent Auricular Keloids during Pregnancy. Arch Plast Surg 2013, 40(1):70-72.

  286. Kiprono SK, Chaula BM, Masenga JE, Muchunu JW, Mavura DR, Moehrle M: Epidemiology of keloids in normally pigmented Africans and African people with albinism: population-based cross-sectional survey. Br J Dermatol 2015, 173(3):852-854.

  287. Kouotou EA, Nansseu JR, Omona Guissana E, Mendouga Menye CR, Akpadjan F, Tounkara TM, Zoung-Kanyi Bissek AC, Ndjitoyap Ndam EC: Epidemiology and clinical features of keloids in Black Africans: a nested case-control study from Yaounde, Cameroon. Int J Dermatol 2019, 58(10):1135-1140.

  288. Lee CP: Keloids--their epidemiology and treatment. Int J Dermatol 1982, 21(9):504-505.

  289. Marneros AG, Norris JE, Olsen BR, Reichenberger E: Clinical genetics of familial keloids. Arch Dermatol 2001, 137(11):1429-1434.

  290. Nakashima M, Chung S, Takahashi A, Kamatani N, Kawaguchi T, Tsunoda T, Hosono N, Kubo M, Nakamura Y, Zembutsu H: A genome-wide association study identifies four susceptibility loci for keloid in the Japanese population. Nat Genet 2010, 42(9):768-771.

  291. Noishiki C, Hayasaka Y, Ogawa R: Sex Differences in Keloidogenesis: An Analysis of 1659 Keloid Patients in Japan. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2019, 9(4):747-754.

  292. Ogawa R, Okai K, Tokumura F, Mori K, Ohmori Y, Huang C, Hyakusoku H, Akaishi S: The relationship between skin stretching/contraction and pathologic scarring: the important role of mechanical forces in keloid generation. Wound Repair Regen 2012, 20(2):149-157.

  293. Quong WL, Kozai Y, Ogawa R: A Case of Keloids Complicated by Castleman"s Disease: Interleukin-6 as a Keloid Risk Factor. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017, 5(5):e1336.

  294. Scheinpflug J, Hofer CT, Schmerbeck SS, Steinfath M, Doka J, Tesfahunegn YA, Violet N, Renko K, Gulich K, John T et al: A microphysiological system for studying human bone biology under simultaneous control of oxygen tension and mechanical loading. Lab Chip 2023, 23(15):3405-3423.

  295. Zhang T, Huang C, Luo H, Li J, Huang H, Liu X, Zhan S: Identification of key genes and immune profile in limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension by bioinformatics analysis. Life Sci 2021, 271:119151.

  296. Zheng JN, Li Y, Yan YM, Shi H, Zou TT, Shao WQ, Wang Q: Identification and Validation of Key Genes Associated With Systemic Sclerosis-Related Pulmonary Hypertension. Front Genet 2020, 11:816.

  297. Ogawa R: The Most Current Algorithms for the Treatment and Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A 2020 Update of the Algorithms Published 10 Years Ago. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022, 149(1):79e-94e.

  298. Ai JW, Liu JT, Pei SD, Liu Y, Li DS, Lin HM, Pei B: The effectiveness of pressure therapy (15-25 mmHg) for hypertrophic burn scars: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017, 7:40185.

  299. Atkinson JA, McKenna KT, Barnett AG, McGrath DJ, Rudd M: A randomized, controlled trial to determine the efficacy of paper tape in preventing hypertrophic scar formation in surgical incisions that traverse Langer"s skin tension lines. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005, 116(6):1648-1656; discussion 1657-1648.

  300. Chan KY, Lau CL, Adeeb SM, Somasundaram S, Nasir-Zahari M: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective clinical trial of silicone gel in prevention of hypertrophic scar development in median sternotomy wound. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005, 116(4):1013-1020; discussion 1021-1012.

  301. O"Brien L, Jones DJ: Silicone gel sheeting for preventing and treating hypertrophic and keloid scars. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013, 2013(9):CD003826.

  302. Hsu KC, Luan CW, Tsai YW: Review of Silicone Gel Sheeting and Silicone Gel for the Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids. Wounds 2017, 29(5):154-158.

  303. Oren R, Zagury Al, Katzir O, Kollender Y, Meller I: Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery. In., edn. Edited by Malawer. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013: 583-593.

  304. Committee. NMA: Topic: The Diagnosis and Treatment of Lymphedema. Position Statement of the National Lymphedema Network. . In.; 2011: 1-19.

  305. Segal R, Zwaal C, Green E, Tomasone JR, Loblaw A, Petrella T, Exercise for People with Cancer Guideline Development G: Exercise for people with cancer: a systematic review. Curr Oncol 2017, 24(4):e290-e315.

  306. Boyd C, Crawford C, Paat CF, Price A, Xenakis L, Zhang W, Evidence for Massage Therapy Working G: The Impact of Massage Therapy on Function in Pain Populations-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials: Part II, Cancer Pain Populations. Pain Med 2016, 17(8):1553-1568.

  307. Stout NL, Baima J, Swisher AK, Winters-Stone KM, Welsh J: A Systematic Review of Exercise Systematic Reviews in the Cancer Literature (2005-2017). PM R 2017, 9(9S2):S347-S384.

  308. Hu M, Lin W: Effects of exercise training on red blood cell production: implications for anemia. Acta Haematol 2012, 127(3):156-164.

  309. Bland KA, Zadravec K, Landry T, Weller S, Meyers L, Campbell KL: Impact of exercise on chemotherapy completion rate: A systematic review of the evidence and recommendations for future exercise oncology research. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019, 136:79-85.

  310. Streckmann F, Zopf EM, Lehmann HC, May K, Rizza J, Zimmer P, Gollhofer A, Bloch W, Baumann FT: Exercise intervention studies in patients with peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review. Sports Med 2014, 44(9):1289-1304.

  311. Lee JM, Look RM, Turner C, Gardiner SK, Wagie T, Douglas J, Sorenson L, Evans L, Kirchner S, Dashkoff C et al: Low-level laser therapy for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2012, 30(15_suppl):9019-9019.

  312. Rick O, von Hehn U, Mikus E, Dertinger H, Geiger G: Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics-induced polyneuropathy: A prospective randomized placebo-controlled phase-III study. Bioelectromagnetics 2017, 38(2):85-94.

  313. Kilinc M, Livanelioglu A, Yildirim SA, Tan E: Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in patients with peripheral and central neuropathic pain. J Rehabil Med 2014, 46(5):454-460.

  314. Oberoi S, Zamperlini-Netto G, Beyene J, Treister NS, Sung L: Effect of prophylactic low level laser therapy on oral mucositis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014, 9(9):e107418.

  315. Westphal JG, Schulze PC: Exercise training in cancer related cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Dis 2018, 10(Suppl 35):S4391-S4399.

  316. Ross M, Fischer-Cartlidge E: Scalp Cooling: A Literature Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability for Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2017, 21(2):226-233.

  317. Kessels E, Husson O, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM: The effect of exercise on cancer-related fatigue in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2018, 14:479-494.

  318. Rief H, Omlor G, Akbar M, Welzel T, Bruckner T, Rieken S, Haefner MF, Schlampp I, Gioules A, Habermehl D et al: Feasibility of isometric spinal muscle training in patients with bone metastases under radiation therapy - first results of a randomized pilot trial. BMC Cancer 2014, 14:67.

  319. Bensadoun RJ, Nair RG: Low-Level Laser Therapy in the Management of Mucositis and Dermatitis Induced by Cancer Therapy. Photomed Laser Surg 2015, 33(10):487-491.

  320. Temoshok L: Biopsychosocial studies on cutaneous malignant melanoma: psychosocial factors associated with prognostic indicators, progression, psychophysiology and tumor-host response. Soc Sci Med 1985, 20(8):833-840.

  321. Dirksen SR: Perceived well-being in malignant melanoma survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum 1989, 16(3):353-358.

  322. Lichtenthal WG, Cruess DG, Schuchter LM, Ming ME: Psychosocial factors related to the correspondence of recipient and provider perceptions of social support among patients diagnosed with or at risk for malignant melanoma. J Health Psychol 2003, 8(6):705-719.

  323. Sollner W, Zschocke I, Zingg-Schir M, Stein B, Rumpold G, Fritsch P, Augustin M: Interactive patterns of social support and individual coping strategies in melanoma patients and their correlations with adjustment to illness. Psychosomatics 1999, 40(3):239-250.

  324. Devine D, Parker PA, Fouladi RT, Cohen L: The association between social support, intrusive thoughts, avoidance, and adjustment following an experimental cancer treatment. Psychooncology 2003, 12(5):453-462.

  325. Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Gruen RJ, DeLongis A: Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986, 50(3):571-579.

  326. Belyaev AM, Chulkova VA, Semiglazova TYu, Rogachev MV (eds.): Oncopsychology for oncologists and medical psychologists. A manual. St. Petersburg: Lyubavich; 2017.

  327. Fawzy FI, Cousins N, Fawzy NW, Kemeny ME, Elashoff R, Morton D: A structured psychiatric intervention for cancer patients. I. Changes over time in methods of coping and affective disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990, 47(8):720-725.

  328. Holland JC, Passik S, Kash KM, Russak SM, Gronert MK, Sison A, Lederberg M, Fox B, Baider L: The role of religious and spiritual beliefs in coping with malignant melanoma. Psychooncology 1999, 8(1):14-26.

  329. Baider L, Perry S, Sison A, Holland J, Uziely B, DeNour AK: The role of psychological variables in a group of melanoma patients. An Israeli sample. Psychosomatics 1997, 38(1):45-53.

  330. Lehto US, Ojanen M, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P: Predictors of quality of life in newly diagnosed melanoma and breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2005, 16(5):805-816.

  331. Fawzy FI, Fawzy NW, Hyun CS, Elashoff R, Guthrie D, Fahey JL, Morton DL: Malignant melanoma. Effects of an early structured psychiatric intervention, coping, and affective state on recurrence and survival 6 years later. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1993, 50(9):681-689.

  332. Fawzy FI, Kemeny ME, Fawzy NW, Elashoff R, Morton D, Cousins N, Fahey JL: A structured psychiatric intervention for cancer patients. II. Changes over time in immunological measures. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990, 47(8):729-735.

  333. Fawzy FI, Canada AL, Fawzy NW: Malignant melanoma: effects of a brief, structured psychiatric intervention on survival and recurrence at 10-year follow-up. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003, 60(1):100-103.

  334. Boesen EH, Boesen SH, Frederiksen K, Ross L, Dahlstrom K, Schmidt G, Naested J, Krag C, Johansen C: Survival after a psychoeducational intervention for patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma: a replication study. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25(36):5698-5703.

  335. Boesen EH, Ross L, Frederiksen K, Thomsen BL, Dahlstrom K, Schmidt G, Naested J, Krag C, Johansen C: Psychoeducational intervention for patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma: a replication study. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23(6):1270-1277.

  336. McLoone J, Menzies S, Meiser B, Mann GJ, Kasparian NA: Psycho-educational interventions for melanoma survivors: a systematic review. Psychooncology 2013, 22(7):1444-1456.

  337. Sample A, He YY: Mechanisms and prevention of UV-induced melanoma. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2018, 34(1):13-24.

  338. Craig S, Earnshaw CH, Viros A: Ultraviolet light and melanoma. J Pathol 2018, 244(5):578-585.

  339. Runger TM: Mechanisms of Melanoma Promotion by Ultraviolet Radiation. J Invest Dermatol 2016, 136(9):1751-1752.

  340. Green AC, Williams GM, Logan V, Strutton GM: Reduced melanoma after regular sunscreen use: randomized trial follow-up. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29(3):257-263.

  341. Ghiasvand R, Weiderpass E, Green AC, Lund E, Veierod MB: Sunscreen Use and Subsequent Melanoma Risk: A Population-Based Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol 2016, 34(33):3976-3983.

  342. Marcil I, Stern RS: Risk of developing a subsequent nonmelanoma skin cancer in patients with a history of nonmelanoma skin cancer: a critical review of the literature and meta-analysis. Arch Dermatol 2000, 136(12):1524-1530.

  343. Kiiski V, de Vries E, Flohil SC, Bijl MJ, Hofman A, Stricker BH, Nijsten T: Risk factors for single and multiple basal cell carcinomas. Arch Dermatol 2010, 146(8):848-855.

  344. Sanchez G, Nova J, Rodriguez-Hernandez AE, Medina RD, Solorzano-Restrepo C, Gonzalez J, Olmos M, Godfrey K, Arevalo-Rodriguez I: Sun protection for preventing basal cell and squamous cell skin cancers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016, 7:CD011161.

  345. Badertscher N, Meier M, Rosemann T, Braun R, Cozzio A, Tag B, Wensing M, Tandjung R: The role of skin self-examination at the Swiss skin cancer day. BMC Health Serv Res 2014, 14:581.

  346. Wu S, Han J, Li WQ, Li T, Qureshi AA: Basal-cell carcinoma incidence and associated risk factors in U.S. women and men. Am J Epidemiol 2013, 178(6):890-897.

  347. Karagas MR, Stukel TA, Greenberg ER, Baron JA, Mott LA, Stern RS: Risk of subsequent basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin among patients with prior skin cancer. Skin Cancer Prevention Study Group. JAMA 1992, 267(24):3305-3310.

  348. Ramachandran S, Rajaratnam R, Smith AG, Lear JT, Strange RC: Patients with both basal and squamous cell carcinomas are at a lower risk of further basal cell carcinomas than patients with only a basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009, 61(2):247-251.

  349. Flohil SC, Koljenovic S, de Haas ER, Overbeek LI, de Vries E, Nijsten T: Cumulative risks and rates of subsequent basal cell carcinomas in the Netherlands. Br J Dermatol 2011, 165(4):874-881.

  350. Flohil SC, van der Leest RJ, Arends LR, de Vries E, Nijsten T: Risk of subsequent cutaneous malignancy in patients with prior keratinocyte carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 2013, 49(10):2365-2375.

  351. Aryasit O, Preechawai P, Hajeewaming N: Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Predictors Affecting Survival Outcome of Eyelid Malignancy. J Craniofac Surg 2019, 30(5):1516-1519.

  352. Schneider J: The teaspoon rule of applying sunscreen. Arch Dermatol 2002, 138(6):838-839.

  353. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP: Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982, 5(6):649-655.

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

  1. Aliev M.D., Advisor to the General Director for Scientific and Clinical Work at the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health, Academician of the RAS, President of the Eastern European Sarcoma Group

  2. Alieva S.B., MD, Leading Researcher at the Department of Radiation Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health; Member of the Association of Melanoma Specialists

  3. Alymov Yu. V., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Oncologist, Surgical Department No. 11 for Head and Neck Tumors, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Executive Director of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists"

  4. Bokhyan B.Yu., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of General Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Eastern European Sarcoma Group

  5. Gafton G.I., D. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Scientific Department of General Oncology and Urology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Board Member of the Association of Melanoma Specialists

  6. Demidov L.V., D. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department of Surgical Treatment Methods No. 12 (Oncodermatology), N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chairman of the Board of the Association of Melanoma Specialists

  7. Dobrokhotova V.Z., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Assistant Professor at the Department of Oncology, Faculty of General Medicine, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health (Sechenov University)

  8. Kushkin D.N., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Chief Medical Officer of the Skin Clinic Medical Center, Member of MBA, AAD, IDS, ESMS, EADV, EADO,

  9. Mudunov A.M., D. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of Surgical Department No. 11 for Head and Neck Tumors, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, President of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists"

  10. Orlova K.V., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Surgical Treatment Methods No. 12 (Oncodermatology), N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health; Board Member of the Association of Melanoma Specialists

  11. Protsenko S.A., D. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Department of Chemotherapy and Innovative Technologies, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Board Member of the Association of Melanoma Specialists

  12. Pustynsky I.N., D. Sc. (Med.), Associate Professor at the Department of Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Faculty of General Medicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Corresponding Member of the International Cryosurgery Society, Board Member of the Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists

  13. Samoilenko I.V., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Department of Surgical Treatment Methods No. 12 (Oncodermatology), N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health; Board Member of the Association of Melanoma Specialists

  14. Trofimova O.P., D. Sc. (Med.), Leading Researcher, Radiological Department, Department of Radiation Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health; Member of the Association of Melanoma Specialists

  15. Filonenko E.V., D. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Center for Laser and Photodynamic Diagnostics and Therapy of Tumors, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health, Oncologist;

  16. Kharatishvili T.K., D. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Leading Researcher, Department of General Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health; Member of the Association of Melanoma Specialists

  17. Kharkevich G.Yu., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Leading Researcher, Department of Surgical Treatment Methods No. 12 (Oncodermatology), N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health; Member of the Association of Melanoma Specialists

  18. Petenko N.N., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Oncologist, Department of Surgical Treatment Methods No. 12 (Oncodermatology), N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health

Early Diagnostics Section

  1. Shlivko I.L., D. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

  2. Garanina O.E., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Assistant Professor at the Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, Privolzhsky Research Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

Medical Rehabilitation Section:

  1. Obukhova O.A., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Department of Medical Rehabilitation, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health

  2. Semiglazova T.Yu., D. Sc. (Med.), Leading Researcher, Scientific Department of Innovative Methods of Therapeutic Oncology and Rehabilitation, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Associate Professor at the Department of Oncology, I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health;

Healthcare Organization Section:

  1. Nevolskikh A.A., D. Sc. (Med.), Professor, Deputy Director for Clinical Work, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health;

  2. Khaylova Zh.V., PhD, Chief Physician of the Clinic, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the National Medical Research Center for Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.

  3. Gevorkyan T.G., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Deputy Director for the Implementation of Federal Projects, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health

Section on the Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Eyelid Skin:

  1. Amiryan A.G., D. Sc. (Med.), Chief Researcher, Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

  2. Borodin Yu.I., Cand. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Radiology Department, Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Association of Ophthalmologists;

  3. Brovkina A.F., Academician of the RAS, Professor at the Department of Ophthalmology with a Course in Pediatric Ophthalmology and a Course in Ophthalmic Oncology and Orbital Pathology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Honored Scientist of the RF, Association of Ophthalmologists;

  4. Bulgakova E.S., Cand. Sc. (Med.), S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia

  5. Golubeva O.V., Cand. Sc. (Med.), S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia

  6. Grishina E.E., D. Sc. (Med.), Prof., Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute (MONIKI) named after M.F. Vladimirsky, Association of Ophthalmologists;

  7. Zhiltsova M.G., Cand. Sc. (Biol.), Cytologist, Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Association of Clinical Cytologists of Russia;

  8. Kleyankina S.S., Cand. Sc. (Med.), S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia

  9. Panova I.E., Professor, D. Sc. (Med.), Deputy Director for Scientific Work, St. Petersburg Branch of the S.N. Fyodorov National Medical Research Center of Eye Microsurgery of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Association of Ophthalmologists;

  10. Neroev V.V., Professor, Academician of the RAS, D. Sc. (Med.), Director of the Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, President of the Association of Ophthalmologists;

  11. Saakyan S.V., Professor, D. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Department of Ophthalmic Oncology and Radiology, Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Association of Ophthalmologists;

  12. Yarovoy A.A., D. Sc. (Med.), Head of the Department of Ophthalmic Oncology and Radiology, S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia

Conflict of interest: none declared

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience for these clinical guidelines:

  • oncologists;

  • surgeons;

  • radiologists;

  • medical geneticists;

  • dermatovenerologists;

  • pathologists;

  • ophthalmologists;

  • medical students, residents, and graduate students.

Table 32. Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

There is only a rationale for the mechanism of action or expert opinion

Table 33. Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitation interventions)

LoE

Definitions

1

Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis

2

Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

There is only a rationale for the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion

Table 34. Scale for assessing grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitation interventions)

GoR

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.

The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

  1. Current instructions for medicinal products mentioned in these clinical guidelines can be found at http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru.

  2. The current nomenclature of medical services is available at: https://med-b-pb-zhdanovka-r897.gosweb.gosuslugi.ru/netcat_files/8/9/Prikaz_Minzdrava_Rossii_ot_13_10_2017_N_804n_red_ot_24_09.pdf

Table A3-1. Terms describing procedures in the clinical guideline and possible (closest) terms from the current nomenclature of medical services.

Term appearing in the clinical guideline

Types and subtypes of medical services most suitable for the clinical guideline term (based on the nomenclature of medical services approved by Order No. 804n of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation dated October 13, 2017)

In vivo pathomorphological examination of biopsy material

A10.30.001 Macroscopic examination of removed surgical specimen

A08.01.001 Pathological examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material;

A08.01.001.002 Pathological examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods

Cytological examination of tumor material

A08.01.002 Cytological examination of skin micropreparation

Ultrasound examination of regional lymph nodes

A04.06.002 Ultrasound examination of lymph nodes (one anatomical region)

Computed tomography (CT) with intravenous contrast of the affected anatomical region

A06.08.007.004 Computed tomography of paranasal sinuses with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement

A06.08.009.002 Computed tomography of the neck with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement

A06.09.005.002 Computed tomography of thoracic organs with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement

A06.30.005.002 Computed tomography of abdominal and retroperitoneal organs with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement

A06.20.002.003 Computed tomography of pelvic organs in women with contrast enhancement

A06.21.003.003 Computed tomography of pelvic organs in men with contrast enhancement

A06.23.004.002 Computed tomography of soft tissues of the head with contrast enhancement A06.23.004.006 Computed tomography of the brain with intravenous contrast enhancement

A06.12.050 Computed tomographic angiography of a single anatomical region

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with intravenous contrast of the affected anatomical region

A05.01.002 Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissues A05.01.002.001 Magnetic resonance imaging of soft tissues with contrast enhancement

A05.03.004 Magnetic resonance imaging of the facial skull A05.03.004.001 Magnetic resonance imaging of the facial skull with intravenous contrast enhancement

Cytological examination of a scraping or touch smear

A11.01.016 Obtaining a touch smear from the skin surface

A11.01.009 Skin scraping

A11.01.001 Skin biopsy

A11.01.005 Biopsy of nodules, tophi

Incisional (punch) full-thickness skin biopsy

A11.01.001 Skin biopsy

A11.30.013 Biopsy of soft tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions

A11.30.014 Core needle biopsy of superficial tumors and lymph nodes under visual control

Planar resection (of a skin neoplasm)

A11.01.001 Skin biopsy

Metastasis biopsy under ultrasound/CT guidance

A11.06.001.001 Ultrasound-guided lymph node puncture

A11.06.002.001 Ultrasound-guided lymph node biopsy

A11.30.024.001 Ultrasound-guided soft tissue puncture

A04.30.009 Ultrasound navigation for minimally invasive procedures

A11.03.001.002 Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy of the spine A11.03.001.003 Computed tomography-guided core needle biopsy of pelvic bones

A11.09.003.002 Ultrasound-guided pleural puncture

A11.14.001.001 Ultrasound-guided liver biopsy

A11.15.001.001 Ultrasound-guided puncture biopsy of the pancreas

Laser surgery using a CO2 laser

A22.01.003 Laser destruction of skin tissue

A22.30.013 Laser surgery for soft tissue neoplasms

Eyelid skin plastic surgery

A16.26.111 Eyelid repair (blepharoplasty) with and without tissue grafting

A16.26.111.001 Upper eyelid repair without tissue grafting via percutaneous approach

A16.26.111.002 Upper eyelid repair without tissue grafting via transconjunctival approach

A16.26.111.003 Lower eyelid repair via percutaneous subciliary approach with skin flap formation

A16.26.111.004 Lower eyelid repair via percutaneous subciliary approach with myocutaneous flap

A16.26.111.005 Lower eyelid repair via percutaneous subciliary approach with myopexy

A16.26.111.006 Lower eyelid repair via percutaneous subciliary approach with canthopexy

A16.26.111.007 Lower eyelid repair via percutaneous subciliary approach with transposition of orbital fat into the tear trough

A16.26.111.008 Lower eyelid repair via transconjunctival approach

A16.26.111.009 Biplanar lower eyelid repair

A16.26.111.010 Asian blepharoplasty

Photodynamic therapy

A22.01.007 Photodynamic therapy for diseases of the skin, subcutaneous adipose tissue, and skin appendages

A22.01.007.001 Intraoperative photodynamic therapy for neoplasms of the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and skin appendages

A22.30.020 Photodynamic therapy of a malignant neoplasm

Medical genetic counseling

B01.006.001 Initial consultation (examination, interview) with a geneticist

B01.006.002 Follow-up consultation (examination, interview) with a geneticist

A01.30.013 Anamnesis and complaint collection during genetic counseling

A01.30.014 Visual examination during genetic counseling

A01.30.015 Pedigree construction

Reconstructive and plastic surgical techniques

A16.01.005.005 Wide excision of a skin neoplasm with a reconstructive-plastic component

A16.30.032.002 Excision of soft tissue neoplasms with a reconstructive-plastic component

A16.30.075 Reconstructive and plastic surgeries with tissue complex transposition (skin, muscles, tendons)

A16.30.058 Soft tissue plastic surgery

A16.01.010 Autologous skin grafting

A16.01.010.001 Skin grafting for wound closure using dermato-expansion

A16.01.010.002 Local tissue flap repair of wound

A16.01.010.004 Cross-finger skin flap

A16.01.010.005 Free skin graft using a dermatome-perforated flap

A16.09.032.005 Reconstructive and plastic surgeries on the chest wall and diaphragm for chest wall tumors (soft tissue, ribs, sternum, clavicle)

A16.23.048.001 Microsurgical removal of a craniofacial neoplasm with skull base defect repair using autografts or artificial implants

A16.23.048.002 Microsurgical removal of a craniofacial neoplasm using endoscopic techniques with skull base defect repair using autografts or artificial implants

A16.23.049.001 Resection of the craniofacial complex with microsurgical reconstruction using autografts or artificial implants

A16.23.049.002 Resection of the craniofacial complex with a reconstructive-plastic component

A16.23.049.003 Resection of the craniofacial complex with microsurgical reconstruction

A16.23.049.004 Resection of the craniofacial complex with microsurgical reconstruction using video-endoscopic technologies

A16.23.050 Reconstructive surgeries for craniofacial neoplasms

A16.23.050.001 Microsurgical reconstruction of the craniofacial complex with microsurgical reconstruction using autografts or artificial implants

Standard skin tumor excision with a 4 mm margin

A16.01.005 Excision of skin lesion

A16.01.005.005 Wide excision of a skin neoplasm with a reconstructive-plastic component

A16.01.035 Excision of skin and subcutaneous adipose tissue

Excision (or re-excision, or removal, or repeat removal, or excision, or repeat excision) of a skin tumor with intraoperative morphological control of all resection margins

A16.01.005.005 Wide excision of a skin neoplasm with a reconstructive-plastic component

+

A08.30.017 Urgent intraoperative pathological examination

Curettage and electrocoagulation

A16.01.017.001 Removal of benign skin neoplasms by electrocoagulation

Cryodestruction of skin tumors (or cryosurgery for skin tumors)

A24.01.004 Cryodestruction of skin

Close-range X-ray therapy

A06.01.007 X-ray therapy for skin neoplasms

A06.01.007.001 Close-range X-ray therapy for skin neoplasms

Gamma therapy

A07.01.004 Telecobalt therapy for skin neoplasms

Electron therapy

A07.30.025.001 External beam radiation therapy for soft tissue lesions using medical electron accelerators

Brachytherapy

A07.30.014 Interstitial radiation therapy

A07.30.028 Placement of endostat(s) during interstitial radiation therapy

A07.30.007 Applicator radiation therapy with the fabrication and application of custom applicators. 3D-4D planning

External beam radiation therapy with electron or photon beam

A07.30.025 External beam radiation therapy for soft tissue lesions

Hypofractionated radiation therapy

A07.30.025 External beam radiation therapy for soft tissue lesions

Regional lymphadenectomy, complete regional lymphadenectomy, or lymphadenectomy

A16.06.006 Cervical lymphadenectomy A16.06.006.001 Axillary lymphadenectomy A16.06.006.002 Extended cervical lymphadenectomy

A16.06.006.003 Extended cervical lymphadenectomy with angioplasty A16.06.006.004 Extended cervical lymphadenectomy with a reconstructive-plastic component

A16.06.006.003 Extended cervical lymphadenectomy with angioplasty A16.06.006.004 Extended cervical lymphadenectomy with a reconstructive-plastic component

A16.06.016.003 Ilioinguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (Dukes operation) A16.06.016.004 Bilateral ilioinguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (Dukes operation)

Massage

A21.01.001 General medical massage

A21.01.009 Medical lower extremity massage

Pneumatic compression

A15.12.002.001 Intermittent pneumatic compression of lower extremities

A17.30.009 Barotherapy - extremity pressotherapy, pneumatic compression

B05.027.001 Medical rehabilitation services for a patient after cancer surgery

B05.027.002 Medical rehabilitation services for a patient after chemotherapy

B05.027.003 Medical rehabilitation services for a patient after radiation therapy

Kinesio taping, electrotherapy, laser therapy, low-level laser therapy, magnetotherapy

B05.027.001 Medical rehabilitation services for a patient after oncological surgery

B05.027.002 Medical rehabilitation services for a patient after chemotherapy

B05.027.003 Medical rehabilitation services for a patient after radiation therapy

Percutaneous electrical stimulation

A17.24.010 Multifunctional neuromuscular electrical stimulation

A17.30.006 Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS)

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix B. Algorithms of physician actions — Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Figure 1. Diagram of diagnosis and treatment for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Appendix C. Patient Information

Recommendations for self-skin examination and primary prevention of melanoma and non-melanoma skin tumors

The main risk factor for CSCC, melanoma, and other skin tumors is ultraviolet damage, which occurs due to natural causes (sunburns) or artificial causes (specific working conditions or visiting tanning salons).

Different skin types react differently to the same dose of ultraviolet radiation; while some people (with fair skin, the so-called phototype I) always develop sunburns even from minimal doses of UV light (initial stage: skin erythema), others experience minimal harm from solar UV (individuals with tanned or dark skin). The majority of the Russian population has phototypes I–III (i.e., "fair") and is therefore highly sensitive to sunburn.

Prevention of skin sunburn is a key factor in primary prevention. Sunburns during childhood and adolescence make a particularly serious contribution to increasing the risk of melanoma. General recommendations come down to the following simple rules.

1. Use data from mobile applications and weather forecasts regarding the UV index level (the UV index is an indicator characterizing the level of ultraviolet radiation). If the UV index is greater than 2, sun protection is required (see Table 353533).

Table 35. Protection measures depending on the UV index

UV Index

Protection measures

0–2

No protection needed. Being outdoors poses no danger.

3–7

Protection required. Stay in the shade during midday hours. Wear long-sleeved clothing and a hat. Use sunscreen.

8

Extra protection required. Stay indoors during midday hours. Remain in the shade when outdoors. Be sure to wear long-sleeved clothing, a hat, and use sunscreen.

2. Use of a broad-spectrum sunscreen (preventing both UVA and UVB radiation) with an efficacy (SPF [Sun Protecting Factor] for UVB, PPD [Persistent Pigment Darkening] for UVA) appropriate for your skin phototype (i.e., individuals with lighter skin require a higher SPF or PPD). In general, individuals with skin phototype I or II are recommended to use sunscreens with SPF 30–50+ and a maximum PPD of 42.

3. Sunscreens should be combined with other sun protection methods: wearing clothing and UV-blocking glasses, wide-brimmed hats (it is estimated that for a hat's shadow to cover the face and neck, its brim must be at least 10 cm wide), and staying in the shade.

4. Children are additionally recommended to wear special UV-protective clothing.

5. Do not use artificial tanning equipment and lamps.

Rules for applying sunscreens:

  • sunscreens should be applied 30 minutes before going outside to all areas of skin exposed to solar radiation;

  • reapplication should be carried out every 2 hours, as well as immediately after swimming and excessive sweating;

  • photoprotection corresponding to that indicated on the sunscreen label is achieved when it is applied to the skin in an amount of 2 mg/cm2; application in a smaller volume sharply reduces the degree of skin protection from ultraviolet radiation. To understand the amount of sunscreen required for the labeled skin protection, i.e., 2 mg/cm2, the "teaspoon rule" [352] has been developed:

– arm: 1/2 teaspoon of product;

– head and neck: 1/2 teaspoon;

– leg: 1 teaspoon;

– chest: 1 teaspoon;

– back: 1 teaspoon;

  • if it is impossible to apply the required volume of sunscreen all at once, early reapplication (in 15 to 30 minutes) of the cream is necessary;

  • sunscreens must be stored at temperatures below +30 °C and must not be used after the expiration date.

Skin examination:

It is recommended to periodically (at least once every 3–6 months) self-examine your entire skin using both a full-length and a hand-held mirror. The examination algorithm is schematically presented in Fig. 5;

During the examination, special attention should be paid to pigmented spots measuring 4–5 mm or more with asymmetry of shape or color, irregular (scalloped) borders, and uneven coloration (various shades of brown). If you notice pigmented spots that exhibit at least 2 of these characteristics, consult a dermatologist or oncologist. It is not necessary that this mole will turn out to be malignant, but further evaluation of its condition should be entrusted to a doctor. Special attention should be paid to skin lesions where any characteristics change over time (e.g., the area of the pigmented spot increases, or the "mole" becomes thicker, or, conversely, part of the "mole" begins to fade and disappear) – such lesions will also require examination by a physician specializing in the early diagnosis of skin tumors.

Appendix C. Patient information — Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

Fig. 2. Skin examination algorithm

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Appendix G1. WHO/ECOG performance status scale [353].

Russian title: WHO Patient Performance Status Scale/ECOG

Original title: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization Performance Status (ECOG/WHO PS)

Source (official developer website, validation publication): https://ecog-acrin.org/resources/ecog-performance-status

Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP: Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982, 5(6):649-655

Type: rating scale

Purpose: to describe the patient's level of functioning in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activities, and physical abilities (walking, work, etc.).

Contents:

Score

Description

0

Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction (90–100% on the Karnofsky scale)

1

Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (e.g., light housework, office work, 70–80% on the Karnofsky scale)

2

Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours (50–60% on the Karnofsky scale)

3

The patient is capable of only limited self-care, confined to a chair or bed for more than 50% of waking hours (30–40% on the Karnofsky scale)

4

Disabled, completely incapable of self-care, confined to a wheelchair or bed (10–20% on the Karnofsky scale)

5

Dead

Key (interpretation): provided within the scale itself

Scales and calculators from this guideline

MoCA — score calculationMontreal Cognitive Assessment: sum of scores by sectionECOG / WHO (Performance Status)Scale for assessing the general condition of cancer patientsKarnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)Percentage scale for self-care and work capacityRECIST 1.1 — Tumor Response to TreatmentCalculation of solid tumor response category: CR, PR, SD, or PD based on the sum of diameters
ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer based on the "Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma" and other active clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health with a reference to the section, rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to set up ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines