Uterine Body Cancer and Uterine Sarcomas: Clinical Guidelines

Applies toadults2025 editionC54, C55, D07.0

Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults. 2025 edition, ICD-10 codes: C54, C55, D07.0. This page features an abridged version by WhiteCoat Pro and the full official text.

Receive research articles on "Uterine Body Cancer and Uterine Sarcomas"Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in English, with figures, sample size, and conclusions. Plus updates to Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary of the guideline text, 2025 edition. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

Uterine body cancer is a malignant tumor of the endometrium; uterine sarcomas include mesenchymal and mixed epithelial-mesenchymal tumors. The guideline outlines diagnosis and staging confirmation, surgical, radiation, and drug treatment, as well as follow-up and care organization.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Collect complaints and medical history, specifically clarifying bleeding, anemia syndrome, rapid growth of myoma nodes, and factors influencing treatment selection (LoE C, LoR 5). → in the text
  2. Perform an examination of the external genitalia, speculum examination of the cervix and vagina, bimanual and rectovaginal examination; evaluate ECOG/Karnofsky performance status, nutritional status, and palpate inguinal, supraclavicular, and infraclavicular lymph nodes (LoE C, LoR 5). → in the text
  3. Order complete blood count and blood chemistry evaluating liver and kidney function, coagulation panel, and urinalysis; complete blood count is repeated at least 5 days prior to the next cycle of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or targeted therapy (LoE C, LoR 5). Determine CA125 (LoE A, LoR 1). → in the text
  4. Perform transvaginal and transabdominal pelvic ultrasound. An M-echo > 12 mm in the 1st phase of the cycle in women of reproductive age or > 5 mm after menopause requires ruling out endometrial neoplasia (LoE B, LoR 2). → in the text
  5. Obtain material for morphological verification: perform endometrial aspiration biopsy or dilation and curettage of the uterine cavity and cervical canal; indicate the histological type and grade of differentiation in the report (LoE B, LoR 3). → in the text
  6. After confirming the tumor, perform pelvic MRI and regional lymphatic drainage zones with IV contrast, chest CT; in case of high risk and sarcomas, supplement the workup with abdominal CT/MRI or PET-CT for staging (LoE C, LoR 5; LoE B, LoR 2). → in the text
  7. Determine MSI-H/dMMR and HER2 for first-line chemotherapy and/or disease progression; refer patients under 50 or with a family history of endometrial/colorectal cancer for genetic counseling (LoE C, LoR 5). → in the text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

What type of bleeding warrants workup for uterine body cancer?

Acyclic uterine bleeding in reproductive age and postmenopausal bleeding are the main symptoms. The intensity of bleeding does not correlate with tumor risk. → in the text

What endometrial thickness on ultrasound is considered suspicious?

In the 1st phase of the menstrual cycle in reproductive-age women, an M-echo > 12 mm is concerning, and > 5 mm after menopause. If these thresholds are exceeded, neoplastic endometrial process must be ruled out. → in the text

Is an endometrial biopsy necessary when uterine body cancer is suspected?

Yes. Endometrial aspiration biopsy or fractional diagnostic curettage of the uterine cavity and cervical canal is performed; the diagnosis is morphologically confirmed indicating the type and grade of tumor differentiation. → in text

When is fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer possible?

In well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma stage IA without myometrial invasion in a patient of reproductive age with unfulfilled reproductive function. Treatment is carried out with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (52 mg) and GnRH agonists with histological follow-up every 3 months; after fulfilling reproductive plans, surgical treatment is required. → in text

How should a patient be monitored after treatment for endometrial cancer?

Gynecological and physical examination is performed every 3 months for the first 3 years, then every 6 months for another 2 years. Ultrasound of the pelvic organs, abdominal cavity, and retroperitoneal space is performed every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for another 3 years; CT, MRI, and PET-CT are performed as indicated. → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
460, edition 4 (ID 460_4)
Publication date
January 23, 2025
Age category
adults
ICD-10 codes
C54C55D07.0
Specialties
Oncology
Developers
Association of Oncologists of Russia
All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Clinical Oncology"
All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Specialists in Prevention and Treatment of Tumors of the Reproductive System"
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Guidelines — 460_4

Abbreviated Clinical Guidelines: Uterine Corpus Cancer and Uterine Sarcomas

The condensed version of this guideline by WhiteCoat Pro is 288 pages long: every section of the document is summarized concisely in plain language, complete with tests and fill-in-the-blanks for self-assessment. Essential when you need not just to read a guideline, but to master it for an exam, accreditation, or clinical practice.
All abbreviated clinical guidelines: 280
Beginning of abbreviated version — open

Extrafascial hysterectomy (Type I operation according to the M.S. Piver classification, 1974):

  • Hysterectomy with minimal vaginal resection.
  • The vesicouterine ligament is not dissected.
  • The cardinal ligament is transected directly at the uterus.

1.1. Definition

Uterine corpus cancer (UCC) — a malignant tumor originating from the mucous membrane of the uterine corpus (endometrium).

1.2. Etiology and Pathogenesis

General characteristics:

  • Nature: Predominantly sporadic.
  • Heredity: ~5% of cases are associated with hereditary syndromes (specifically, Lynch syndrome).

Risk factors:

  • Hyperestrogenism.
  • Early menarche.
  • Nulliparity in anamnesis.
  • Late menopause.
  • Age over 55 years.
  • Tamoxifen use.

Pathogenetic types of UCC (Bochman, 1983):

Type I (more frequent):

  • Age: Younger.
  • Background: Prolonged hyperestrogenism and endometrial hyperplasia.
  • Concomitant pathology: Obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension (the triad); estrogen-secreting ovarian tumors or polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are possible.
  • Tumor characteristics: As a rule, well-differentiated.
  • Prognosis: More favorable.

Type II:

  • Age: Older.
  • Background: Endometrial atrophy, absence of hyperestrogenism.
  • Tumor characteristics: Usually poorly differentiated.
  • Prognosis: Less favorable.

Histological structure:

  • Approximately 80% of patients are diagnosed with endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Uterine sarcomas:

These include mesenchymal and mixed epithelial/mesenchymal tumors.

  • Malignant mesenchymal tumors:
  • Leiomyosarcoma.
  • Endometrial stromal tumors.
  • Related tumors.
  • Mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumors:
  • Adenosarcoma.
  • Carcinosarcoma.
  • Molecular profile: Genetic and molecular studies confirm the similarity of the profiles of uterine carcinosarcoma and poorly differentiated uterine corpus cancer (UCC).
  • Conclusion: This indicates the epithelial origin of carcinosarcoma.

Incidence of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus

  • Absolute number of cases (2021): 25,482.
  • Crude incidence rate: 32.62 per 100,000 female population.
  • 10-year dynamics: Increase by 21.93% (average growth rate ~1.96% per year).
  • Age-standardized rate (world standard): 17.34 per 100,000 population.
  • 10-year dynamics: Increase by 9.52% (average annual growth rate 0.9%).
  • Peak incidence: Age group 65–69 years (91.3 cases per 100,000).
  • Rank places of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus in the structure of cancer morbidity:
  • 2nd place: groups 60–64 years and 70–74 years (86.4 and 88.7 respectively).
  • 3rd place: groups 55–59 years and 75–79 years.
  • 4th place: age groups 50–54 and 80–84 years.
  • 6th place and below: other age groups.

Mortality

  • Absolute number of deaths (2021): 6,734 women.
  • Rank in cancer mortality structure: 8th place (5.2%).
  • Mortality trends (over 10 years):
  • Crude rate: Slight increase of 0.68% (to 8.62 per 100,000).
  • Age-standardized rate: Decrease of 13.2% (from 4.32 in 2011 to 3.86 per 100,000 in 2021). This indicates a reduction in mortality from this pathology.
  • Peak mortality: Age groups 75 years and older (31.5 to 32.94 per 100,000).
The official full text of the guideline below remains open and free. Only the condensed study version as a whole is paid: section-by-section explanations, self-assessment tests, and integration with platform materials.

List of Abbreviations

IV - Intravenous

WHO - World Health Organization

G-CSF - Colony-stimulating factors

EBRT - External beam radiation therapy

Malignant neoplasm

CT — computed tomography

RT - Radiation therapy

MRI — magnetic resonance imaging

PET - Positron emission tomography

PET-CT - Positron emission tomography-computed tomography

UCC - Uterine corpus cancer

CA-125 - Cancer antigen 125

Ultrasound — ultrasound examination

CT - Chemotherapy

dMMR - Deficient mismatch repair

ECOG - Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

ESGO - European Society of Gynaecological Oncology

ESMO - European Society for Medical Oncology

ESTRO - European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology

IMRT - Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

MMR - Mismatch repair

MSI-H - Microsatellite instability-high

PD-L1 (programmed cell death 1 ligand) - Programmed death-ligand 1

** - Vital and essential drugs

# - Off-label drug (used outside of the indications, contraindications, routes of administration, or dosages contained in the drug's package insert)

Terms and Definitions

Extrafascial hysterectomy – hysterectomy with minimal vaginal resection, without excision of the pubocervical ligament; the cardinal ligament is transected close to the uterus (Type I operation according to the classification of M.S. Piver, 1974).

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Uterine corpus cancer (UCC) – a malignant tumor originating from the mucous membrane of the uterine corpus (endometrium).

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

In the majority of patients, UCC is sporadic. In approximately 5% of cases, UCC is associated with hereditary syndromes, notably Lynch syndrome [1]. Risk factors for this pathology include hyperestrogenism, early menarche, nulliparity, late menopause, age over 55 years, and tamoxifen use [2, 3]. Two pathogenetic types of UCC are distinguished [4].

Type I (more common). The tumor develops at a younger age compared to patients with the type II pathogenetic variant, against the background of prolonged hyperestrogenism and endometrial hyperplasia. Patients with type I pathogenetic UCC frequently present with obesity, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension; estrogen-secreting ovarian tumors or polycystic ovary syndrome are possible. Tumors of the type I pathogenetic variant are typically high-grade (well-differentiated) and have a more favorable prognosis.

Type II. Endometrial tumors are usually low-grade (poorly differentiated) and have a less favorable prognosis. Tumors of the type II pathogenetic variant occur at an older age, in the absence of hyperestrogenism, against the background of endometrial atrophy.

Approximately 80% of patients with UCC are diagnosed with endometrioid adenocarcinoma.

Uterine sarcomas include mesenchymal tumors, as well as mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumors. The group of malignant mesenchymal tumors comprises leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal and related tumors. Mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumors include adenosarcoma and carcinosarcoma. Genetic and molecular studies have demonstrated similarities in the molecular profiles of uterine carcinosarcoma and low-grade UCC, indicating the epithelial origin of carcinosarcoma.

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

In 2021, 25,482 cases of malignant neoplasms (MN) of the uterine corpus were detected. The crude incidence rate in 2021 was 32.62 per 100,000 female population. Over 10 years, this rate increased by 21.93%, with an average annual growth rate of about 1.96%. Over the same period, the age-standardized incidence rate (standardized to the world population age distribution) increased by 9.52%, reaching 17.34 per 100,000 population in 2021, with an average annual growth rate of 0.9%.

In the 65–69 age group, the highest incidence rate is observed—91.3 cases per 100,000 female population of the corresponding age. In the 60–64 and 70–74 age groups, malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus rank 2nd in the structure of cancer incidence (86.4 and 88.7, respectively); in the 55–59 and 75–79 age groups, they rank 3rd; in the 50–54 and 80–84 age groups, they rank 4th; and in other age groups, 6th and below.

In 2021, 6,734 women died from malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus. In the structure of female cancer mortality causes, malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus rank 8th (5.2%).

Over a 10-year trend, the crude mortality rate from malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus increased insignificantly by 0.68%, amounting to 8.62 per 100,000 female population in 2021, whereas the age-standardized mortality rate for women from malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus is decreasing: in 2011 it was 4.32, and in 2021 it was 3.86 per 100,000 female population; a decrease of 13.2%, which indicates a true decline in mortality from this pathology. The highest mortality rates are noted in the age groups of 75 years and older—from 31.5 to 32.94 per 100,000 female population of the corresponding age [5].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

D07.0 – Endometrial carcinoma in situ

C54 Malignant neoplasm of uterine corpus:

C54.0 Isthmus uteri (lower uterine segment)

C54.1 Endometrium

C54.2 Myometrium

C54.3 Fundus uteri

C54.8 Overlapping lesion of uterine corpus

C54.9 Malignant neoplasm of uterine corpus, unspecified

C55 Malignant neoplasm of uterus, part unspecified

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

International Histological Classification of UCC (World Health Organization (WHO) Classification, 5th Edition, 2020) [6 - 8]

Malignant epithelial tumors:

- Endometrioid adenocarcinoma:

  • POLE-ultramutated,

  • MMR-deficient,

  • p53-mutated,

  • no specific molecular profile (NSMP)

- Serous carcinoma

- Clear cell carcinoma;

- Mixed adenocarcinoma;

- Undifferentiated and differentiated carcinoma;

- Carcinosarcoma;

- Other

Malignant mesenchymal tumors:

- Leiomyosarcoma:

  • Epithelioid leiomyosarcoma;

  • Myxoid leiomyosarcoma;

  • Spindle cell leiomyosarcoma.

- Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

- High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma

- Undifferentiated uterine sarcoma

- Other

Malignant mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumors:

- Adenosarcoma

There are 3 degrees of differentiation of endometrial adenocarcinoma:

G1 – well-differentiated

G2 – moderately differentiated

G3 – poorly differentiated

According to the 2020 WHO classification, endometrioid carcinoma should be categorized into low-grade and high-grade; low-grade tumors include G1 and G2, while high-grade tumors include G3.

Staging

Staging of endometrial cancer and uterine sarcomas is performed according to the TNM (8th edition, 2017) and FIGO (2009) classifications (Tables 1, 2).

Table 1 presents the staging classification for endometrial cancer and carcinosarcoma, and Table 2 presents the staging classification for uterine leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Table 1. Stages of endometrial cancer and uterine carcinosarcoma according to the TNM system (8th edition, 2017) and FIGO classification (2009)

TNM

FIGO

Description

TX

The primary tumor cannot be assessed

T0

No primary tumor

T1a

IA

Tumor confined to the endometrium or with invasion of less than half of the myometrium

T1b

IB

Tumor with invasion of half or more of the myometrium

T2

II

Tumor invades the cervical stroma, but does not extend beyond the uterus

T3a

IIIA

Tumor invades the uterine serosa, fallopian tubes, or ovaries (direct extension or metastases)

T3b

IIIB

Tumor invades the vagina or parametria (direct extension or metastases)

T4

IVA

Tumor invades the mucosa of the bladder or colon

NX

Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed

N0

No regional lymph node metastases (pelvic or para-aortic)

IIIC

Regional lymph node metastases (pelvic or para-aortic)

N1

IIIC1

Pelvic lymph node metastases

N2

IIIC2

Para-aortic lymph node metastases

M0

No distant metastases

M1

IVB

Distant metastases (including inguinal lymph nodes and intra-abdominal lymph nodes other than pelvic or para-aortic; excluding metastases to the vagina, uterine adnexa, and pelvic peritoneum)

Table 2. Stages of uterine leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma according to the TNM system (8th edition, 2017) and FIGO classification (2009)*

TNM

FIGO

Description

T1

I

Tumor limited to the uterus

T1a

IA

Tumor <5 cm

T1b

IB

Tumor >5 cm

T2

II

Tumor extends beyond the uterus, but within the pelvis

T2a

IIA

Involvement of uterine adnexa

T2b

IIB

Involvement of other organs and tissues

T3

III

Abdominal cavity involvement

T3a

IIIA

Single focus

T3b

IIIB

Two or more foci

T4

IVA

Invasion of bladder or rectal mucosa

N0

No regional lymph node metastases (pelvic or para-aortic)

N1

IIIC

Regional lymph node metastases (pelvic or para-aortic)

M0

No distant metastases

M1

IVB

Distant metastases

Simultaneous involvement of the uterine corpus and ovaries/pelvis in the setting of endometriosis should be interpreted as synchronous primary malignancies.

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

The main clinical manifestations of malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus are acyclic uterine bleeding during the reproductive period or postmenopausal bleeding. Sometimes malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus are asymptomatic and detected in asymptomatic women during pelvic ultrasound (ultrasound examination). Malignant neoplasms of the uterine corpus may be accompanied by chronic anemia, as well as rapid growth of myomatous nodes and enlargement of the uterus.

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

Criteria for establishing the diagnosis of the disease or condition:

1) anamnesis data;

2) physical examination findings;

3) pathomorphological examination data of biopsy and/or surgical material from the uterine cavity;

4) diagnostic imaging findings.

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

It is recommended to thoroughly collect complaints and anamnesis in all patients in order to identify factors that may influence the choice of treatment tactics [2].

LoE CGoR 5Level of evidence – C (grade of recommendation – 5)

Comment: the main symptom of endometrial cancer is acyclic uterine bleeding in the reproductive period or bleeding in the postmenopausal period. The intensity of bleeding does not correlate with the risk of endometrial cancer. Sometimes endometrial cancer is detected in asymptomatic women during pelvic ultrasound and subsequent examination or during cytological screening for cervical cancer. Special attention should be paid to long-standing anemia syndrome, as well as rapid growth of myomatous nodes.

2.2 Physical Examination

It is recommended that all patients with malignant tumors of the uterine body or suspected malignant tumors of the uterine body undergo a thorough physical examination during the initial examination (appointment, consultation) by an oncologist and/or obstetrician-gynecologist, including visual inspection of the external genitalia, speculum examination of the cervix and vaginal walls, bimanual vaginal examination, and transrectal digital (rectovaginal) examination in order to verify the diagnosis, determine treatment tactics and algorithms, and assess the prognosis of the disease [3].

LoE CGoR 5Level of evidence – C (grade of recommendation – 5)

Comment:

- Special attention should be paid to assessing the patient's performance status according to the WHO/ECOG scale and/or the Karnofsky scale (see Appendix G1-2), and assessing nutritional status.

- During a vaginal (gynecological) examination, the mucous membrane of the cervix and vagina is visually inspected to detect potential tumor extension to the ectocervix or metastases in the vaginal wall. Bimanual gynecological examination assesses the condition of the parametria.

- Physical examination must include palpation of the inguinal, supraclavicular, and infraclavicular lymph nodes to rule out potential metastatic enlargement.

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (CBC), a general biochemical blood test including liver and kidney function tests, a coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis test), and a urinalysis in all patients with malignant tumors of the uterine body or suspected malignant tumors of the uterine body to assess their general condition, determine treatment tactics and algorithms, and assess the prognosis of the disease [9].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment:

Laboratory tests determine the functional state of various organs and systems to establish the feasibility of a particular type of treatment.

In a complete blood count (CBC), it is advisable to assess the following parameters: hemoglobin, red blood cells, platelets, white blood cells, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume (MCV) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC), differential white blood cell count (leukocyte formula), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR);

- a complete blood count (CBC) is performed (repeated) at least 5 days before the start of the next cycle of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or targeted therapy, if administered [10].

- in the general biochemical blood test with evaluation of liver and kidney function parameters: study of total protein, glucose, total bilirubin, creatinine, blood urea, determination of the activity of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in the blood, study of

total bilirubin level in the blood; in some cases, plasma electrolytes (blood potassium, sodium, and chloride levels), etc.;

- in urinalysis: visual examination of urine (color and clarity), specific gravity (relative density), urine protein, hydrogen ion concentration (pH), urine glucose, ketone bodies, and microscopic examination of urine sediment.

- as part of the blood coagulation study, a coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis test) is evaluated (blood fibrinogen, prothrombin time by Quick, international normalized ratio (INR), prothrombin time (PT) in blood or plasma, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and thrombin time (TT)). As indicated, additional tests include D-dimer concentration, antithrombin III activity, etc.

It is recommended that all patients with suspected malignant tumors of the uterine body undergo a blood test for the tumor marker CA125 for differential diagnosis of neoplasms, determination of treatment tactics and algorithms, and assessment of the prognosis of the disease [11].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation — A (Level of Evidence — 1)

Comment: An elevated CA125 level is an indirect sign of tumor spread beyond the uterus.

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

It is recommended that all patients with suspected malignant tumors of the uterine body undergo pelvic ultrasound (transvaginal and transabdominal); all patients with histologically verified malignant tumors of the uterine body, in addition to pelvic ultrasound, should undergo a comprehensive ultrasound of the abdominal cavity, retroperitoneal space, and lymph nodes (regional and peripheral lymph nodes) to assess the primary tumor and the extent of the tumor process, and to plan the treatment algorithm [130].

GOR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).

Comment:

- Ultrasound is the simplest and most accessible method for visualizing the spread of the tumor process in the pelvic cavity, abdominal cavity, retroperitoneal space, as well as regional and distant lymph nodes.

- For pelvic ultrasound, transabdominal and transvaginal (TVUS) approaches should be used; if TVUS is not feasible, transrectal ultrasound should be performed.

- For patients of reproductive age, the endometrial thickness (M-echo) in the proliferative phase of the menstrual cycle is no more than 12 mm. For postmenopausal patients, the M-echo thickness is no more than 5 mm. If these M-echo thickness values are exceeded, neoplastic endometrial processes must be ruled out. [12, 128, 129]

- The use of color Doppler mapping (CDM), power Doppler imaging (PDI), elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) increases the diagnostic value of the method in the differential diagnosis of malignant tumors of the uterine body and the assessment of primary tumor extent [130].

It is recommended that all patients with suspected endometrial pathology undergo endometrial aspiration biopsy or fractional diagnostic curettage of the uterine cavity and cervical canal [13].

GCR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendations — B (Level of Evidence — 3).

Comment:

- The diagnosis is established based on the results of endometrial aspiration biopsy and/or fractional diagnostic curettage of the cervical canal and uterine cavity with or without hysteroscopy, based on pathomorphological examination of the biopsy (surgical) material, with mandatory indication of the histological type and grade of the tumor differentiation.

- Hysteroscopy is essential when extension of the tumor process to the cervical canal is suspected or to determine the feasibility of standalone hormone therapy.

It is recommended that all patients with malignant tumors of the uterine body undergo pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with intravenous contrast of the pelvic organs and regional lymphatic drainage zones to assess the extent of the tumor process when planning the treatment algorithm [131, 132].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment:

- Pelvic MRI with intravenous contrast is the most informative method for assessing the depth of myometrial tumor invasion [128, 133]. The MRI protocol for assessing myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer should include: high-resolution T2-weighted images (WI) obtained in a plane perpendicular to the uterine cavity; diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI); dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with images obtained in the post-contrast phases at 30-60 sec, 120-180 sec, and 4-5 min [128, 134, 135].

- Pelvic MRI with intravenous contrast is a mandatory method when planning fertility-sparing treatment (in early stages of the disease) [136, 137].

- Contrast-enhanced pelvic computed tomography (CT) in women may be performed, if MRI is not feasible, in patients with malignant tumors of the uterine body to assess extrauterine invasion. Pelvic CT is not recommended for assessing the depth of myometrial invasion due to its low diagnostic accuracy, which is inherent to the physical principles of the method [14, 15, 16].

It is recommended that all patients with confirmed or suspected malignant neoplasms of the uterine body undergo computed tomography (CT) of the chest cavity (with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement if necessary); for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer and uterine sarcomas, as well as those whose clinical situation requires further diagnostic clarification, in addition to chest CT, it is recommended to perform contrast-enhanced CT of the abdominopelvic organs (or contrast-enhanced MRI of the abdominopelvic organs) or positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) using a tumor-tropic radiopharmaceutical to determine the extent of the tumor process and plan the treatment algorithm [16–18].

GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).

Comment:

– It should be borne in mind that at the time of surgery, metastatic lymph nodes are enlarged in fewer than 10% of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. Further diagnostic evaluation of metastatic lymph node involvement is necessary to determine the extent of the surgical intervention.

– If a patient has contraindications to intravenous contrast enhancement during CT, the diagnostic accuracy of the method in assessing tumor spread is reduced; [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]-FDG) PET-CT may be prescribed as an alternative imaging modality [18].

– In cases of histologically verified high-grade or undifferentiated uterine sarcomas, whole-body [18F]-FDG PET-CT using a tumor-tropic radiopharmaceutical is recommended when the results of other imaging modalities (ultrasound, MRI, CT) used to diagnose distant metastasis and lymph node status are inconclusive [138, 139].

– If chest CT is not feasible, targeted chest radiography is recommended for diagnosing metastatic lung lesions [9, 10, 19].

It is recommended that all patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body who present with clinical or radiological findings suggestive of skeletal bone metastases undergo positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) using a tumor-tropic radiopharmaceutical; if PET-CT with a tumor-tropic radiopharmaceutical is not available, whole-body bone scintigraphy is recommended [16, 195].

GOM CLOE 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Data Reliability – 4).

It is recommended that patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body and suspected brain metastases undergo contrast-enhanced brain MRI [16, 17].

CGR CLOE 2Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendation Grade – C (Level of Evidence – 2)

Comment: if MRI is not feasible and/or if there are contraindications, contrast-enhanced brain CT may be performed.

2.5 Other Procedures

It is recommended that all patients with confirmed or suspected malignant neoplasms of the uterine body undergo pathomorphological examination of biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods (as indicated) to determine further management tactics.

reflecting the following parameters in the report [4]:

- histological type of the tumor;

- tumor grade;

- tumor size;

- depth of tumor invasion;

- myometrial thickness at the site of maximum tumor invasion;

- tumor invasion of the uterine serosa;

- presence or absence of tumor emboli in blood and lymphatic vessels ( lymphovascular invasion). If lymphovascular invasion is present, its grade must be specified (focal invasion – a single focus of invasion, substantial/marked invasion ≥5 vessels);

- extension of the tumor to the cervix, invasion into the cervical stroma;

- extension of the tumor into the parametrium;

- extension of the tumor to the vagina;

- total number of removed and affected pelvic lymph nodes on the right and left;

- total number of removed and affected para-aortic lymph nodes;

- metastatic involvement of the ovaries and fallopian tubes;

- tumor invasion into the wall of the urinary bladder or rectum (when pelvic exenteration or resection of adjacent organs is performed);

- degree of therapeutic pathomorphosis of the primary tumor and lymph node metastases in case of preoperative therapy.

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment:

– In case of inconclusive results of the pathomorphological examination of biopsy material, patients with suspected malignant neoplasms of the uterus are indicated to undergo either a repeat biopsy or surgical intervention with pathomorphological examination of the biopsy (surgical) material, including intraoperative examination. In case of inconclusive results of the pathomorphological examination of biopsy (surgical) material in patients with suspected or confirmed malignant neoplasms of the uterus, pathomorphological examination of the biopsy (surgical) material using immunohistochemical methods is indicated for clarification purposes in order to determine further management tactics.

It is recommended that patients with uterine body malignant neoplasm undergo assessment of microsatellite instability level (MSI-H/dMMR) and determination of HER-2 status by immunohistochemistry at the first-line chemotherapy stage and/or in case of uterine malignant neoplasm progression, in order to determine further patient management tactics [184].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment:

– For endometrial malignancies, immunohistochemical testing for dMMR is the method of choice; it is advisable to assess the expression of 4 MMR proteins: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. Alternative methods (PCR, NGS) can be used as an additional study method in case of inconclusive immunohistochemical testing results or when immunohistochemical testing is not feasible [184].

– In the serous subtype of endometrial cancer and in carcinosarcoma, it is advisable to determine HER2 expression, since in HER2-positive tumors, trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy can be prescribed as early as the first line of therapy.

It is recommended that all patients with endometrial cancer younger than 50 years or with a burdened family history of endometrial cancer and/or colorectal cancer undergo a consultation (examination, assessment) with a genetic counselor to identify hereditary genetic mutations that may influence the choice of the patient's treatment algorithm [23].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended that prior to initiating antitumor treatment, all patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body undergo additional evaluation, as indicated, to detect concomitant somatic pathology and prevent life-threatening conditions [4].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment: in the presence of somatic pathology and/or to clarify the extent of the tumor process, it is advisable to conduct additional examinations as indicated to select the optimal treatment tactics for the patient.

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

The prescription and use of medicinal products specified in the clinical guidelines are aimed at providing the patient with clinically effective and safe medical care; therefore, their prescription and use in a specific clinical situation are determined in accordance with the instructions for use of specific medicinal products, implementing the precautions presented in the instructions, and dose adjustments may also be made taking into account the patient's condition.

3.1. Surgical treatment

  • Surgical intervention is recommended as the most effective method of treatment for patients with endometrial cancer regardless of stage, either alone or in combination with other methods, provided that all manifestations of the tumor process can be completely removed [9, 17, 24–26].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment:

– Laparoscopic, laparotomic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal, and robot-assisted interventions are feasible for endometrial cancer, provided that the surgical access accomplishes the objectives of the surgical stage of treatment, including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy if indicated [24–27].

– Laparoscopic access is the primary approach in the surgical treatment of localized endometrial cancer [24, 28]. The advantage of this method lies in the reduction of peri- and postoperative complications, particularly in older patients and patients with overweight, while achieving comparable long-term treatment outcomes compared to laparotomic access [24, 28].

– In the presence of absolute contraindications to surgical treatment, radical radiation therapy (RT) or first-line chemotherapy (3–6 cycles) is performed, with the possibility of subsequently addressing the issue of surgical treatment for sanitation and prevention of bleeding risk. The scope of surgical treatment is determined depending on the stage of the disease and the patient's performance status.

  • For patients with stage I endometrial cancer, surgical treatment is recommended as the most effective method [9, 17].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment:

- For high-grade stage IA endometrioid adenocarcinoma without myometrial invasion in reproductive-age patients with unfulfilled reproductive desires, standalone hormone therapy (HT) may be performed with the goal of fertility preservation [29 - 31]. This treatment option should be carried out in institutions with experience in treating such patients. Patients must be informed of the high recurrence rate after conservative treatment, as well as the necessity of surgical treatment after completing their reproductive plans. HT for endometrial cancer includes the use of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (52 mg) and GnRH agonists. The duration of treatment is at least 9–12 months, provided that treatment efficacy is evaluated by endometrial histological examination every 3 months. In the absence of a complete histological response at 6–12 months from the start of treatment, hysterectomy is indicated. Upon achieving a complete response, pregnancy planning is possible. Realization of reproductive function is recommended as soon as possible after the end of treatment. Assisted reproductive technologies may be used. There is evidence of a marked increase in the risk of death in patients older than 40 years when using this treatment approach, and therefore its routine use in this age group is not recommended. for the purpose of diagnosis verification, determining the treatment strategy and algorithm, and assessing disease prognosis – preoperative radiotherapy is not advisable.

  • The recommended scope of surgical intervention for patients with endometrial cancer is extrafascial hysterectomy with adnexectomy [9, 17].

GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).

It is recommended to perform a biopsy with pathological examination of the surgical material from all lesions suspicious for tumor located during surgical exploration of the abdominal cavity, pelvis, and retroperitoneal space in patients with endometrial cancer for morphological verification and disease staging [10, 17, 27, 33].

GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2).

Comment:

- In patients under 45 years of age with high-grade endometrial cancer with invasion of less than half the myometrial thickness and no signs of extrauterine tumor spread, ovarian preservation with hysterectomy and salpingectomy is possible [10, 26, 34]. Ovarian preservation is not advisable in the presence of BRCA1/2 gene mutations and Lynch syndrome.

- In the presence of ascites, it is necessary to collect fluid for cytological examination of the peritoneal fluid. The presence of tumor cells in the peritoneal effusion (based on cytological examination results) should be noted, but it does not affect the stage of the disease [3, 22].

- In the presence of a clinically significant pleural effusion, it is necessary to collect fluid for cytological examination of the pleural fluid [3, 22].

It is recommended to perform greater omentectomy in patients with serous endometrial cancer, carcinosarcoma, and when ovarian metastases are detected during surgery, where the risk of implant metastasis is high [35].

GOM CLOE 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Data Reliability – 4).

It is recommended to perform lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I serous, clear cell endometrial cancer, and carcinosarcoma. Indications for lymphadenectomy for endometrioid cancer are determined by the risk assessed based on preoperative evaluation results (Table 3) [36, 37].

GOR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).

Comment:

- In the presence of indications for lymphadenectomy, lymph nodes of both regional zones are removed: pelvic and lumbar up to the renal vessels (level IV lymphadenectomy) in high risk. In intermediate risk – when clinical signs of lumbar lymph node involvement are present.

- In patients with intermediate risk of lymphogenic metastasis of stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer, sentinel lymph node mapping can be performed as an alternative to lymphadenectomy. In cases where mapping fails to identify sentinel lymph nodes, a full lymphadenectomy is recommended. If metastases are detected in sentinel lymph nodes, pelvic and lumbar lymphadenectomy up to the renal vessels (level IV) should be performed [141, 142, 143].

Table 3. Indications for lymphadenectomy in clinical stage I endometrial cancer (ESGO, ESMO, ESTRO consensus – European Societies of Gynaecological Oncology, Medical Oncology, and Radiotherapy and Oncology, respectively, 2014)

Myometrial invasion

Differentiation grade

Risk of lymph node metastases

Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy

< ½

High and moderate

Low

No

Low

Intermediate

Possible for staging refinement

> ½

High and moderate

Intermediate

Possible for staging refinement

Low

High

Yes

  • For stage II endometrial cancer, surgical intervention followed by adjuvant treatment is recommended [92].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: approximately 30% of patients with stage II endometrial cancer have pelvic lymph node metastases. The risk of para-aortic lymph node involvement, ovarian involvement, and peritoneal dissemination in clinical stage II endometrial cancer is higher than in stage I [22, 27].

  • For stage III–IV endometrial cancer, it is recommended to start treatment with surgical intervention [27, 38, 39].

GOM CLOE 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Data Reliability – 4).

Comment:

- Surgery allows for the assessment of tumor spread and cytoreduction.

It is recommended to perform pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage III–IV endometrial cancer when macroscopically enlarged regional lymph nodes are detected, since the removal of macrometastases in lymph nodes increases the survival of such patients [36, 37, 40].

GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).

It is recommended to perform surgical treatment in patients with non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, which includes hysterectomy with adnexectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy [27, 41].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment:

- The greater omentum is removed in serous endometrial cancer and carcinosarcoma. There is evidence that lymphadenectomy in uterine carcinosarcoma not only allows for accurate staging but also improves patient survival. Non-endometrioid subtypes of endometrial cancer (serous, clear cell carcinoma, mixed adenocarcinoma, carcinosarcoma, dedifferentiated carcinoma) have an unfavorable prognosis. The exception is mucinous carcinoma, which in the vast majority of cases is well-differentiated and clinically similar to well-differentiated endometrioid endometrial cancer.

  • For uterine leiomyosarcoma, it is recommended to perform extrafascial hysterectomy with adnexectomy [19, 42].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: in patients under 45 years of age with early-stage uterine leiomyosarcoma, ovarian preservation is permissible as it does not affect survival. Removal of pelvic and lumbar lymph nodes is not advisable because their involvement is extremely rare.

  • For low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus, it is recommended to perform extrafascial hysterectomy and removal of macroscopically visible tumors. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy may be advisable, but lymph node metastases do not affect overall survival [19].

GOM CLOE 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Data Reliability – 4).

Comment:

- Low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus is a hormone-dependent tumor. In stage I disease, ovarian metastases are extremely rare. Ovarian preservation in this case increases the risk of recurrence but does not affect overall survival; therefore, in young patients, ovarian preservation should be discussed individually at a multidisciplinary tumor board [43, 44].

  • For high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus, it is recommended to perform extrafascial hysterectomy [45].

GOR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).

Comment: given the extremely unfavorable prognosis, the role of lymphadenectomy and cytoreductive surgery is questionable. High-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma are extremely aggressive tumors with a tendency toward rapid hematogenous metastasis.

3.2. Adjuvant treatment

  • The strategy of adjuvant therapy in patients with stage I endometrial cancer is recommended to be determined based on the scope of the performed surgical intervention [9, 46].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment:

- Indications for adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) are determined primarily by risk factors for lymphogenous metastasis of endometrial cancer, which are completely negated by adequate lymphadenectomy. Despite the fact that none of the published randomized trials of pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer have demonstrated an increase in survival with its performance, regional lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer serves the following purposes: staging refinement and determining further treatment strategy [37, 38]. From the perspective of preventing regional progression, lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial cancer can be considered an alternative to EBRT, which is safer in terms of long-term consequences (late complications, radio-induced tumors), which is especially important in young patients.

- Indications for adjuvant treatment depend on the risk group to which the patient belongs (Table 4) [38].

Table 4. Risk groups in endometrial cancer (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP consensus, 2021)

Risk

Molecular subtype unknown / not determined

Molecular subtype known*

Low

Endometrioid endometrial cancer, stage IA, low grade (G1 and G2), no lymphovascular space invasion (or focal invasion)

Endometrioid endometrial cancer stage I–II with POLE mutation and absence of residual tumor

Stage IA dMMR/NSMP low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer, negative status of lymphovascular space invasion (or focal invasion)

Intermediate

Endometrioid endometrial cancer, stage IA, high grade (G3), no lymphovascular space invasion (or focal invasion)

Endometrioid endometrial cancer, stage IB, low grade (G1 and G2), no lymphovascular space invasion or focal invasion

Non-endometrioid endometrial cancer stage IA (serous, clear-cell, undifferentiated, carcinosarcoma, mixed) without myometrial invasion, no lymphovascular space invasion

Stage IB dMMR/NSMP low-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer, negative status of lymphovascular space invasion (or local invasion)

Stage IA dMMR/NSMP high-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer, negative status of lymphovascular space invasion (or focal invasion)

Non-endometrioid (undifferentiated, clear-cell, serous, mixed carcinomas, carcinosarcoma) or p53-mutant tumors without any myometrial invasion

Intermediate-high

Endometrioid endometrial cancer, stage IB, high grade (G3), regardless of the presence of lymphovascular space invasion

Endometrioid endometrial cancer, stage I, prominent lymphovascular space invasion

Endometrioid endometrial cancer, stage II

Stage I dMMR/NSMP endometrioid endometrial cancer with prominent lymphovascular space invasion regardless of the depth of invasion and grade

Stage IB dMMR/NSMP high-grade endometrioid endometrial cancer regardless of the presence of lymphovascular space invasion

Stage II dMMR/NSMP endometrioid endometrial cancer

High

Endometrioid endometrial cancer, stage III–IVA, with no residual tumor

Non-endometrioid endometrial cancer (serous, clear-cell, undifferentiated, carcinosarcoma, mixed), stage I–IVA, with myometrial invasion, without residual tumor

Stage III–IVA endometrioid endometrial cancer without residual tumor

Stage I–IV endometrioid endometrial cancer with p53 mutation without residual tumor

Stage I–IV dMMR/NSMP non-endometrioid endometrial cancer subtypes (serous, clear-cell, mixed, dedifferentiated carcinomas, carcinosarcomas) with any myometrial invasion in the absence of residual tumor

Advanced disease

Stage III–IVA, with residual tumor

Stage IVB

Stage III–IVA, with residual tumor

Stage IVB

*determination of the tumor molecular subtype is possible in order to clarify indications for additional treatment methods

It is recommended to determine the molecular subtype in patients with endometrial cancer if this can significantly impact the patient's treatment strategy [38].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: determining the mutation status in the exonuclease domain of the polymerase epsilon (POLE) gene, assessing microsatellite instability (dMMR), detecting mutations in the p53 gene, etc., using immunohistochemistry can help refine the disease prognosis and individualize treatment tactics, but is not mandatory when deciding on adjuvant therapy.

  • Adjuvant treatment for stage I–II endometrioid endometrial cancer is recommended to be carried out in accordance with the ESGO, ESMO, ESTRO consensus recommendations (2020) (Tables 5, 6) [38].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Table 5. Adjuvant treatment for stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer (ESGO, ESMO, ESTRO consensus, 2020)

Risk

Lymphadenectomy performed, no lymph node metastases

Lymphadenectomy not performed

Low

No

Intermediate

Brachytherapy or observation, especially in patients aged <60 years

Intermediate-high

(Stage IA, lymphovascular space invasion, stage IB, low grade, lymphovascular space invasion)

Stage IB, high grade)

Brachytherapy or observation

Brachytherapy or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of the pelvis

External beam pelvic radiation therapy in case of lymphovascular space invasion, brachytherapy for G3

External beam pelvic radiation therapy

Table 6. Adjuvant treatment for stage II endometrioid endometrial cancer (ESGO, ESMO, ESTRO consensus, 2014)

Risk

Lymphadenectomy performed, no lymph node metastases

Lymphadenectomy not performed

Low grade (G1 and G2), no lymphovascular space invasion

Brachytherapy

External beam pelvic radiation therapy ± brachytherapy

High grade (G3), lymphovascular space invasion

External beam pelvic radiation therapy ± brachytherapy

External beam pelvic radiation therapy ± brachytherapy

  • For patients with stage III–IV endometrial cancer after surgery, external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with concurrent or adjuvant chemotherapy (ChT), or alternatively sequential ChT followed by radiation therapy (RT), is recommended [144].

GCR ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2)

  • In carcinosarcoma, adjuvant treatment is administered as for high-risk progression carcinomas. Alternatively, chemotherapy alone is possible [24, 35, 36, 101, 145].

GCR ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2)

  • In non-endometrioid endometrial cancer, chemotherapy combined with brachytherapy is recommended as adjuvant treatment [190].

GCR CLEL 3Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 3)

Comment: the exception is stage IA clear-cell endometrial cancer (provided pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is performed) in the absence of lymphovascular space invasion, in which adjuvant brachytherapy may be administered.

3.3. Radiation therapy

  • For patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body in the intermediate-high and high risk groups (see Table 4), considering the stage, histological type of the tumor, and extent of surgical treatment performed, it is recommended to administer RT: EBRT and/or brachytherapy, with or without adjuvant chemotherapy [11, 27, 102]. For patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body in the intermediate risk group for disease progression after surgery, it is recommended to perform observation (primarily for patients under 60 years of age) or brachytherapy [189].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment:

- Adjuvant RT is initiated no later than 60 days from the date of surgery or upon detection of clinical manifestations of disease progression.

External beam RT and/or brachytherapy are planned. Conformal RT IMRT/VMAT with preliminary CT or MRI-based volumetry is used.

All principles of conformal RT are taken into account when planning the irradiation volume for the pelvic region and regional metastasis zones, with or without inclusion of the para-aortic region. Brachytherapy involves both irradiation of the uterus in the absence of a surgical treatment phase and irradiation of the vaginal cuff in the postoperative period.

The planned target volume should include directly the primary tumor (in the absence of surgery), common, external, and internal iliac lymph nodes, the parametrial region, the upper third of the vagina/paravaginal region, and presacral lymph nodes (in cases of cervical tumor invasion) [42]. Extended radiation fields, according to indications, should include the pelvic volume and the region of all groups of iliac and para-aortic lymph nodes. The upper boundary of the field depends on the clinical situation and should reach the level of the L1–L2 vertebrae (or 1–2 cm above the level of the renal vessels), and, taking into account the level of para-aortic lymph node involvement, the upper boundary of the field may reach the Th12 vertebra. The CTV volume should be adjusted individually in cases of a positive vaginal resection margin, peritoneal involvement, or vaginal metastases.

Organs at risk (bladder, bowel loops) can change in volume depending on their filling degree during CT/MRI simulation, especially in patients after hysterectomy. The internal target volume (ITV), which includes the range of motion and deformation of the organs, is considered the clinical target volume (CTV) and must be fully included in the planning treatment volume (PTV). Treatment with a comfortably filled bladder reduces the radiation dose to the bowel and bladder. Repeated volumetric imaging using cone-beam CT is preferred, as it allows for smaller CTV-PTV margins, thereby reducing toxicity to normal tissues.

Postoperative conformal radiotherapy using IMRT/VMAT technology following surgery is the preferred technique. Low toxicity rates combined with high local control have been reported [42, 43].

The prescribed doses for external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) are a total dose of 45.0–50.4 Gy with a fractionation schedule of 1.8–2.0 Gy 5 times per week (the fractionation standard used in the clinic). In the presence of residual tumor in the pelvic lymph nodes or parametria, postoperative conformal radiotherapy using an integrated or sequential stereotactic boost is administered to reach total doses of 55–60 Gy (EQD2) for microscopic residual tumor or up to 66 Gy (EQD2) for macroscopic residual tumor.

The timing of postoperative irradiation of the vaginal vault depends on its healing; it is preferably performed 6 to 8 weeks, but no later than 12 weeks, after surgery. When planning postoperative brachytherapy, irradiation of no more than the upper 2/3 of the vagina to a depth of 0.5 cm from the mucosa is recommended. In cases of lymphovascular invasion or positive resection margins, the irradiated length of the vaginal vault may be increased [43–46].

Radioactive sources 60Co and 192Ir are routinely used in Russia.

  • Adjuvant radiotherapy doses depend on the EBRT technique used. When definitive brachytherapy is administered, 3 fractions of 7 Gy, 5 fractions of 6 Gy, or 4 fractions of 5.5 Gy are prescribed. The 3 fractions of 7 Gy regimen is the most frequently used in clinical practice. The use of lower doses per fraction can be considered as an option for further reducing toxicity in selected cases. When EBRT is followed by brachytherapy, 2–3 fractions of 4–6 Gy are usually recommended.

If surgery is contraindicated, definitive combined radiotherapy or definitive brachytherapy is performed depending on the risk of progression. Total radiation doses depend on the clinical situation. When technical capabilities permit, preference is given to techniques with image guidance

capabilities. For definitive brachytherapy, doses should reach 48 Gy (EQD2) to the body of the uterus, cervix, and upper third (1–2 cm) of the vagina, while for combined radiotherapy, they are increased to 65 Gy (EQD2). When MRI is used, the total dose to the GTV can be increased to ≥80 Gy (EQD2).

  • Palliative radiotherapy (brachytherapy, EBRT) is recommended for debilitated patients with endometrial cancer, whose performance status is assessed using the WHO/ECOG scale >2 scores and/or the Karnofsky scale ≤70 scores (see Appendix G1-2), in cases where other treatment options are not feasible due to severe concomitant comorbidities [191].

GCP CLEL 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence – 4)

Comment: Total doses can reach 40–50 Gy. For small tumor volumes where radical radiotherapy is not feasible, a hypofractionation regimen may be used [146].

  • In cases of endometrial cancer recurrence in the vaginal vault or the presence of a vaginal metastasis as the sole manifestation of the disease, brachytherapy and/or EBRT are recommended, taking into account prior radiotherapy [146].

LoE CGoR 5Level of evidence – C (grade of recommendation – 5)

Comment: the total dose is planned taking into account previous treatment, reaching 30–50 Gy (EQD2) for the planned tumor volume [84].

3.4. Medical treatment

  • In patients with a history of pelvic radiotherapy, primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) is recommended: filgrastim** 5 mcg/kg (rounding the single dose to 300 mcg is permitted) subcutaneously 24–72 hours after completion of the therapy regimen and until neutrophil counts recover from their nadir, or pegfilgrastim** 7.5 mg subcutaneously once, no earlier than 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy administration in platinum-based regimens, or dose reduction of the drugs (e.g., carboplatin** AUC 5) [123, 125, 131, 146].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

  • Adjuvant/systemic chemotherapy is recommended for stage III–IV endometrial cancer and for non-endometrioid endometrial cancer of all stages (except mucinous endometrial cancer) following cytoreductive surgery [17, 38, 60–66, 188].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment:

Chemotherapy should preferably be initiated no later than 4 weeks after surgery. Typically, 6 courses of chemotherapy are administered according to one of the following regimens (radiotherapy is administered according to indications; see corresponding section):

- #paclitaxel** 175 mg/m2 on day 1 and carboplatin** AUC 5–6 on day 1 every 3 weeks [64, 146]. According to indications, primary or secondary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) is performed: filgrastim** 5 mcg/kg (rounding the single dose to 300 mcg is permitted) subcutaneously 24–72 hours after completion of the therapy regimen and until neutrophil counts recover from their nadir, or pegfilgrastim** 7.5 mg subcutaneously once, no earlier than 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy administration [193];

- #paclitaxel** 175 mg/m2 on day 1 and #cisplatin** 60–75 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks. According to indications, primary or secondary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) is performed: filgrastim** 5 mcg/kg (rounding the single dose to 300 mcg is permitted) subcutaneously 24–72 hours after completion of the therapy regimen and until neutrophil counts recover from their nadir, or pegfilgrastim** 7.5 mg subcutaneously once, no earlier than 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy administration [62, 65, 66, 146, 193];

  • Chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for progressive endometrial cancer (6 courses of chemotherapy are administered, or until disease progression, or until unacceptable toxicity occurs) [61–75]. The regimens of choice are platinum- and taxane-based combinations.

GCP CLEL 2Level of Evidence – C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence – 2).

Comment: the following regimens are used:

- #paclitaxel** 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 hours on day 1 and #cisplatin** 60 or 75 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours on day 1 every 3 weeks. According to indications, primary or secondary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) is performed: filgrastim** 5 mcg/kg (rounding the single dose to 300 mcg is permitted) subcutaneously 24–72 hours after completion of the therapy regimen and until neutrophil counts recover from their nadir, or pegfilgrastim** 7.5 mg subcutaneously once, no earlier than 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy administration [65, 66, 114];

- #paclitaxel** 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 hours on day 1 and carboplatin** AUC 5–6 IV over 1 hour on day 1 every 3 weeks; according to indications, primary or secondary prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia with colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) is performed: filgrastim** 5 mcg/kg (rounding the single dose to 300 mcg is permitted) subcutaneously 24–72 hours after completion of the therapy regimen and until neutrophil counts recover from their nadir, or pegfilgrastim** 7.5 mg subcutaneously once, no earlier than 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy administration [64, 70, 114];

- doxorubicin** 50–60 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and #cisplatin** 50–75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks [62, 63, 146];

- #paclitaxel** 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 hours on day 1, carboplatin** AUC 5–6 IV over 1 hour on day 1 every 3 weeks, and #trastuzumab** 8 mg/kg for the first infusion, then 6 mg/kg IV over 30–90 minutes every 3 weeks; according to indications, primary or secondary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) is performed: filgrastim** 5 mcg/kg (rounding the single dose to 300 mcg is permitted) subcutaneously 24–72 hours after completion of the therapy regimen and until neutrophil counts recover from their nadir, or pegfilgrastim** 7.5 mg subcutaneously once, no earlier than 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy administration (for patients with HER2/neu-positive serous endometrial carcinoma) [61, 146];

- #paclitaxel** 175 mg/m2 IV over 3 hours on day 1, carboplatin** AUC 5–6 IV over 1 hour on day 1 every 3 weeks, and #pembrolizumab 200 mg IV infusion over 30 minutes every 3 weeks or 400 mg IV every 6 weeks (in case of MSI/MMR deficiency in the tumor). Pembrolizumab is administered for 2 years or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. According to indications, primary or secondary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) is performed: filgrastim** 5 mcg/kg (rounding the single dose to 300 mcg is permitted) subcutaneously 24–72 hours after completion of the therapy regimen and until neutrophil counts recover from their nadir, or pegfilgrastim** 7.5 mg subcutaneously once, no earlier than 24 hours after completion of chemotherapy administration [186, 146, 193];

  • In case of a late recurrence (≥2 years) of endometrial cancer, a repeated tumor biopsy is recommended [76]. For the serous subtype of endometrial cancer with a disseminated process and progression, an immunohistochemical pathological examination of the HER2/neu receptor protein (determination of HER2/neu status) in the tumor sample is recommended to decide on the advisability of hormone therapy. In case of recurrence of highly differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma, small tumor volumes, and indolent course, hormone therapy is recommended [77 - 82].

GOR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).

Comment: the following hormone therapy regimens for endometrial cancer recurrence are used (administered until disease progression or unmanageable toxicity):

- medroxyprogesterone** 500 mg/day orally daily [146];

- #tamoxifen** 20 mg orally once daily [146];

- #letrozole 2.5 mg/day orally daily [81];

- #anastrozole** 1 mg/day orally daily [81];

- #exemestane 25 mg/day orally daily [82].

  • For patients with stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma, follow-up is recommended after radical surgical treatment [83].

GCP CLEL 2Level of Evidence – C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence – 2).

  • Chemotherapy is recommended for high-grade uterine leiomyosarcoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma of all stages [84 - 90].

GCP CLEL 2Level of Evidence – C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence – 2).

Comment: the following regimens are used:

- doxorubicin** 60–75 mg/m2 IV bolus every 3 weeks (this regimen is preferred for uterine leiomyosarcoma; administration to debilitated patients is possible) [89];

- #gemcitabine** 900 mg/m2 IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 8 and #docetaxel** 100 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour on day 8 with primary or secondary prophylaxis using #filgrastim** 150 mcg/m3 subcutaneously from days 9 to 15 or empegfilgrastim** 7.5 mg subcutaneously once, no earlier than 24 hours after the completion of chemotherapy administration (following external beam radiation therapy to the pelvis and/or prior chemotherapy, a starting dose reduction of #gemcitabine** to 675 mg/m2 and #docetaxel** to 75 mg/m2 is possible; a prolonged form of #filgrastim** may be used) [90];

- #doxorubicin** 75 mg/m2 IV 72-hour infusion and ifosfamide** 2500 mg/m2/day IV 3-hour infusion on days 1–4 (+ #mesna** at a dose of 100% of the ifosfamide** dose IV simultaneously with it on days 1–4) every 3 weeks (with primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF): filgrastim** 5 mcg/kg (rounding the single dose up to 300 mcg is permitted) subcutaneously 24–72 hours after the completion of the therapy regimen on days 5–15, or empegfilgrastim** 7.5 mg subcutaneously once, no earlier than 24 hours after the completion of chemotherapy administration) [84, 146];

- doxorubicin** 60 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and #dacarbazine** 750 mg/m2, dissolved together with doxorubicin**, IV 96-hour infusion every 3 weeks [85];

  • Hormone therapy is recommended for disseminated forms of low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus and hormone-positive uterine leiomyosarcoma [77, 78].

GOR BLOE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).

Comment: the following regimens are used (administered until progression or unmanageable toxicity):

- #letrozole 2.5 mg/day orally daily [77];

- #anastrozole** 1 mg/day orally daily [77];

- #exemestane 25 mg/day orally daily [82];

- medroxyprogesterone** 500 mg/day orally daily [146];

-

- #goserelin** 3.6 mg intramuscularly once every 28 days [77];

- #buserelin** 3.75 mg intramuscularly once every 28 days [146];

- #leuprorelin** 3.75 mg intramuscularly once every 28 days [77].

  • In case of endometrial cancer progression after 1st-line chemotherapy, the use of 2nd-line chemotherapy is recommended (6 cycles of chemotherapy or until progression or unmanageable toxicity) [9, 91 - 98].

GOR CLOE 3Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 3).

Comment: the following regimens are used:

- #pembrolizumab** 200 mg IV drip as a 30-minute infusion every 3 weeks or 400 mg IV drip as a 30-minute infusion every 6 weeks (in the presence of a high level of microsatellite instability (MSI-H), including DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in the tumor) [99, 146];

- pembrolizumab** 200 mg IV drip as a 30-minute infusion every 3 weeks or 400 mg IV drip as a 30-minute infusion every 6 weeks and lenvatinib** 20 mg once daily orally (in the absence of high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) in the tumor across all histological types except carcinosarcoma) [100, 146];

- #topotecan 1.0–1.25 mg/m2 IV on days 1–5 every 3 weeks with primary prophylaxis using colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF): filgrastim** 5 mcg/kg (rounding the single dose up to 300 mcg is permitted) subcutaneously 24–72 hours after the completion of the therapy regimen until neutrophil counts recover to normal levels following their nadir, or empegfilgrastim** 7.5 mg subcutaneously once, no earlier than 24 hours after the completion of chemotherapy administration [91];

- #paclitaxel** 135 mg/m2 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks or 60–80 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 every 3 weeks [95 - 98, 146];

- #oxaliplatin** 130 mg/m2 over 2 hours every 3 weeks [94];

- #doxorubicin** (pegylated liposomal) 40–50 mg/m2 IV every 4 weeks [93, 102, 146];

- #doxorubicin** 50 mg/m2 IV every 4 weeks [146];

- #docetaxel** 75 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks [146]

- #bevacizumab** 7.5 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks [92, 146].

- #gemcitabine** 800 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks [146].

If recurrence occurs more than 6 months after the completion of primary treatment, repeating the 1st-line chemotherapy (including platinum-based chemotherapy agents in the regimen) is possible. If the patient has previously undergone external beam radiation therapy, it is advisable to reduce the doses of #paclitaxel**, #ifosfamide**, and #gemcitabine__, both as monotherapy and in combinations, by 20% [9].

  • In case of progression of leiomyosarcoma, high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma of the uterus, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma, both monochemotherapy and unused 1st-line regimens are recommended [103 - 110].

GCP CLEL 2Level of Evidence – C (Level of Likelihood of Evidence – 2).

Comment: the following chemotherapy drugs and regimens are used:

- #dacarbazine** 1200 mg/m2 IV over 20–30 minutes every 3 weeks (total of 8 cycles) [110];

- #gemcitabine** 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks [86, 87, 111, 112];

- #gemcitabine** 1800 mg/m2 (infusion rate 10 mg/m2/min or over 3 hours) on day 1 IV infusion + #dacarbazine 500 mg/m2 IV infusion on day 1 every 14 days [188];

- epirubicin** 75 mg/m2 IV bolus every 3 weeks [103, 112, 146];

- #doxorubicin** 50–60 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour every 3 weeks [113];

- pazopanib** 800 mg/day orally daily [114, 146] (used in case of progression during cytostatic therapy).

- #temozolomide** 50-75 mg/m2/day orally for 6 of 8 weeks or 150-300 mg/m2/day orally on days 1-5 every 4 weeks [115];

- #eribulin** 1.4 mg/m2 IV over 2–5 minutes on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks [110];

- trabectedin 1.5 mg/m2 IV 24-hour infusion every 3 weeks (for uterine leiomyosarcoma, anthracyclines must have been used previously) [114, 116, 117];

- #docetaxel** 36 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks [109, 146].

- #vinorelbine** 30 mg/m2 IV on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks [146, 147]

Pazopanib**, #temozolomide**, and #eribulin** are used in case of progression during cytostatic therapy [110, 115].

NTRK inhibitors (L01E protein kinase inhibitors) are indicated for sarcomas upon confirmation of a pan-TRK gene rearrangement NTRK

3.5. Treatment of progressive uterine corpus cancer

  • In case of endometrial cancer recurrence in the vaginal stump or a solitary vaginal metastasis without prior radiation therapy, combined radiation therapy or tumor excision followed by combined radiation therapy is recommended [118, 119].

GOM CLOE 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Data Reliability – 4).

  • In case of endometrial cancer recurrence in the vaginal stump after brachytherapy, tumor excision followed by external beam radiation therapy is recommended [118, 119].

GOM CLOE 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Data Reliability – 4).

  • In case of recurrence in the vaginal stump after combined radiation therapy, tumor excision or interstitial radiation therapy under image guidance is recommended. If conditions for surgical treatment and radiation therapy are lacking, chemotherapy is an option [119, 120].

GOM CLOE 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Data Reliability – 4).

Comment: hormone therapy is advisable only for endometrioid endometrial cancer expressing steroid hormone receptors. It should be borne in mind that systemic drug therapy has low efficacy when progression occurs within the irradiated area.

  • In case of regional metastases of endometrial cancer, radiation therapy or lymphadenectomy followed by radiation therapy is recommended [121, 122].

GOM CLOE 4Level of Evidence – C (Level of Data Reliability – 4).

  • In case of regional metastases of endometrial cancer, it is recommended to consider additional systemic chemotherapy [123].

GCP ALoE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).

  • For solitary late distant metastases of uterine body cancer, it is recommended to consider local (surgical or radiation) treatment [9, 17].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment: hormone therapy is possible for distant metastases of highly differentiated uterine body cancer, as well as for small distant non-visceral metastases of endometrial uterine body cancer expressing steroid hormone receptors, in the absence of clinical manifestations (chemotherapy is indicated upon subsequent progression). For distant metastases of moderately and poorly differentiated uterine body cancer, large distant metastases, and in the presence of clinical manifestations, chemotherapy is advisable, combined with palliative radiation therapy if necessary. Palliative care is indicated in case of further progression.

3.6. Pain management

Pain management procedures and recommendations for malignant neoplasms of the uterine body comply with the recommendations presented in the guidelines «Chronic Pain Syndrome (CPS) in Adult Patients Requiring Palliative Medical Care» [http://cr.rosminzdrav.ru/#!/recomend/708].

3.7. Diet therapy

  • To date, there is evidence of an increased risk of developing oncological diseases, including malignant neoplasms of the uterine body, in overweight (obese) female patients [3]. In this regard, it is recommended to implement measures aimed at reducing the patients' excess body weight to normal values. Modifying the usual dietary intake in such patients will help prevent complications of ongoing treatment (surgical, drug, or radiation therapy) [124].

LoR CLE 2Level of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 2).

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

Pre-rehabilitation significantly accelerates functional recovery, shortens hospital stay after surgery, and reduces the incidence of complications and mortality during cancer treatment. Pre-rehabilitation includes therapeutic exercises (physiotherapy) for female reproductive system diseases, psychological and nutritional support, and patient education [148].

It is recommended that female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body undergo physical pre-rehabilitation (consisting of a combination of aerobic and anaerobic loads) to improve exercise tolerance, enhance quality of life, and increase muscle tone [148].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body increase physical activity 2 weeks before surgery – this improves the quality of life in the postoperative period, allowing them to return to full daily activities as early as 3 weeks after surgery [148].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body perform therapeutic exercises at the preoperative stage – this reduces the incidence of postoperative complications [148].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body undergo respiratory muscle training during pre-rehabilitation – this leads to a reduction in the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications and hospital stay duration [148].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • Psychological support is recommended for all female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body as part of pre-rehabilitation – it improves mood and reduces levels of anxiety and depression. Patients who have undergone a course of psychological pre-rehabilitation adapt better to daily life after surgical treatment [148].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: Psychological pre-rehabilitation using techniques aimed at stress management (relaxation techniques, positive mindset formation), starting 5 days before surgery and continuing for 30 days after, is performed for 40–60 minutes 6 days a week [148].

  • All female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body are recommended fast-track rehabilitation and ERAS (early rehabilitation after surgery) tactics, including complex analgesia, early enteral nutrition, avoidance of routine use of tubes and drains, and early mobilization (activation and verticalization) of patients as early as 1–2 days after surgery to reduce the risk of early postoperative complications and readmission rates [154].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • Early initiation of a therapeutic exercise complex incorporating aerobic and strength training, as well as stretching exercises, is recommended for all patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body to improve their quality of life [148].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • The use of breathing exercises, elevating the head of the bed, and early mobilization are recommended for female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body to prevent the development of pulmonary congestion in the postoperative period [155].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • Early mobilization, prophylactic administration of anticoagulants (antithrombotic agents), and wearing compression stockings are recommended for all female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body to prevent thrombotic complications in the postoperative period [158].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

  • For the treatment of pain syndrome in the postoperative period – which is interdisciplinary in nature – in addition to drug correction, it is recommended to use therapeutic exercises for female reproductive system diseases, positioning, psychological pain management methods (relaxation), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and acupuncture (stimulation of acupuncture points by other physical factors) [159].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body undergo general medical massage sessions starting from the 2nd day after surgery to reduce pain intensity, anxiety, and tension, and to improve quality of life [155, 160].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body undergo clinical and psychological correction and use relaxation techniques in the postoperative period – this helps reduce the frequency of analgesia and improve the quality of life of onco-gynecological patients [159].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is recommended that female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body, upon the onset of lower limb lymphostasis, undergo complete decongestive therapy, including medical massage of the lower limb, wearing compression stockings, performing a set of therapeutic exercises, and skin care [164, 160].

GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

It is also recommended that female patients with malignant neoplasms of the uterine body who develop lower limb lymphedema be prescribed:

— intermittent pneumatic compression of the limbs combined with complete decongestive therapy [164, 166].

— low-intensity laser therapy (intravenous blood irradiation) combined with complete decongestive therapy;

— bioelectric therapy combined with complete decongestive therapy;

— deep oscillation (massage with an alternating electric field) combined with complete decongestive therapy [155, 160].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

The following follow-up algorithm for patients is recommended [3, 84]:

  • physical examination, including gynecological examination, every 3 months for 3 years, then every 6 months for another 2 years;

  • cytological examination of micro-specimens from scrapings of the vaginal tissues (vault) in non-irradiated patients every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for another 3 years; once every 12 months or if recurrence is suspected;

  • targeted chest radiography once a year;

  • complex pelvic ultrasound (transvaginal and transabdominal), complex abdominal ultrasound, and retroperitoneal ultrasound every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months for another 3 years;

  • in patients with serous uterine body cancer, late-stage uterine body cancer, as well as with initially elevated serum CA-125 levels, testing for serum cancer antigen CA 125 levels before each doctor's visit;

  • MRI and CT of the pelvis and abdominal cavity, whole-body PET-CT with a tumor-tropic radiopharmaceutical – as clinically indicated [9].

GPR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

6. Organization of Medical Care

Medical care, with the exception of medical care provided as part of clinical trials, in accordance with Federal Law No. 323-FZ dated November 21, 2011, "On the Basics of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation," is organized and provided:

1) in accordance with the regulations on the organization of medical care by types of medical care, approved by the authorized Federal Executive Authority;

2) in accordance with the procedure for the provision of medical care in the profile "oncology", mandatory for implementation throughout the Russian Federation by all medical organizations;

3) based on these clinical guidelines;

4) taking into account the standards of medical care approved by the authorized Federal Executive Authority.

Primary specialized health care is provided by an oncologist and other specialist physicians at an outpatient oncological care center or in a primary oncological office, or in the outpatient department of an oncological dispensary (oncological hospital).

If an oncological disease is suspected or detected in a patient, general practitioners, district general practitioners, general practice physicians (family physicians), specialist physicians, and mid-level medical personnel shall refer the patient in the established manner for consultation at an outpatient oncological care center, a primary oncological office, or the outpatient department of an oncological dispensary (oncological hospital) for the provision of primary specialized health care.

Consultation at an outpatient oncological care center, a primary oncological office, or the outpatient department of an oncological dispensary (oncological hospital) must be performed no later than 5 working days from the date of issuance of the referral for consultation. The oncologist of the outpatient oncological care center (in the absence of an outpatient oncological care center, the oncologist of the primary oncological office or the outpatient department of the oncological dispensary (oncological hospital)) shall arrange for the acquisition of biopsy (surgical) material, as well as other diagnostic tests necessary to establish the diagnosis, including the extent of the oncological process and the stage of the disease.

In the event of the impossibility of acquiring biopsy (surgical) material or performing other diagnostic tests within the medical organization that incorporates the outpatient oncological care center (primary oncological office), the attending physician shall refer the patient to an oncological dispensary (oncological hospital) or to a medical organization providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases.

The timeframe for performing pathological examinations necessary for the histological verification of malignant neoplasms shall not exceed 15 working days from the date of receipt of the biopsy (surgical) material by the pathoanatomical bureau (department).

The timeframes for diagnostic instrumental and laboratory examinations in case of suspected oncological disease shall not exceed the timeframes established in the state guarantee program for the free provision of medical care to citizens, approved by the Government of the Russian Federation.

The diagnosis of an oncological disease is established by an oncologist, and in the case of malignant neoplasms of lymphoid, hematopoietic, and related tissues included in ICD-10 categories C81–C96, also by a hematologist.

An oncologist from an outpatient oncological care center (primary oncology office) refers the patient to an oncological dispensary (oncology hospital) or another medical organization providing medical care to cancer patients, including one subordinate to a federal executive body (hereinafter referred to as a federal medical organization), to clarify the diagnosis (if establishing the diagnosis is impossible, including the extent of the oncological process and disease stage), determine treatment tactics, and in the presence of medical indications for specialized, including high-tech, medical care.

For oncological diseases included in ICD-10 categories C37, C38, C40–C41, C45–C49, C58, D39, C62, C69–C70, C72, C74, as well as those corresponding to the codes of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O), 3rd Edition 8936, 906-909, 8247/3, 8013/3, 8240/3, 8244/3, 8246/3, 8249/3, an oncologist at an oncological dispensary (oncological hospital) or other medical organization providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases shall organize a consultation or a medical board (consilium), including via telemedicine technologies, at federal state budgetary institutions subordinate to the Russian Ministry of Health that provide medical care (hereinafter referred to as national medical research centers for the purposes of this Procedure), in order to determine the treatment tactics.

In complex clinical cases, to clarify the diagnosis (in the event of the impossibility of establishing the diagnosis, including the extent of the oncological process and the stage of the disease) for the purpose of evaluation, interpretation, and description of the results, the oncologist shall arrange for the referral of:

of digital images obtained from pathomorphological examinations to the pathomorphological bureau (department) of the fourth group (reference center)[1] via information interaction, including the use of telemedicine technologies for remote interaction between medical workers;

of digital images obtained from diagnostic imaging methods to the remote diagnostic imaging consultation center via information interaction, including the use of telemedicine technologies for remote interaction between medical workers;

biopsy (surgical) material for repeated pathomorphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic studies: to the pathoanatomical bureau (department) of the fourth group (reference center), as well as to molecular genetic laboratories for molecular genetic testing.

Treatment tactics are established by a medical board (consilium) comprising oncologists, a radiation therapist, and a neurosurgeon (in cases of nervous system tumors) of the medical organization that includes departments of surgical methods for treating malignant neoplasms, antineoplastic drug therapy, and radiotherapy (hereinafter referred to as the oncological consilium), including an oncological consilium conducted using telemedicine technologies, with the involvement of other specialist physicians when necessary.

Dispensary follow-up by an oncologist for a patient with a diagnosed oncological disease is established and carried out in accordance with the procedure for dispensary observation of adults with oncological diseases.

For record-keeping purposes, information about a newly diagnosed case of an oncological disease shall be sent within 3 working days by the oncologist of the medical organization where the respective diagnosis was established to the oncological dispensary or the organization of the subject of the Russian Federation performing the function of registering patients with newly diagnosed malignant neoplasms, including via the Unified State Health Information System.

Specialized, including high-tech, medical care in medical organizations providing medical care to the adult population for oncological diseases is provided based on medical indications stipulated by the regulations on organizing the provision of specialized, including high-tech, medical care.

Specialized medical care, excluding high-tech care, in medical organizations subordinate to federal executive authorities is provided based on medical indications stipulated by paragraph 5 of the procedure for referring patients to medical organizations and other organizations subordinate to federal executive authorities for the provision of specialized (excluding high-tech) medical care, as provided in the appendix to the regulations on organizing the provision of specialized, including high-tech, medical care.

Waiting times for the provision of specialized (excluding high-tech) medical care shall not exceed the timeframes established in the program of state guarantees of free medical care to citizens, approved by the Government of the Russian Federation.

If a patient with an oncological disease has medical indications for medical rehabilitation, the oncologist arranges for it to be provided in accordance with the procedure for organizing adult medical rehabilitation.

If a patient with an oncological disease has medical indications for sanatorium-resort treatment, the oncologist arranges for it in accordance with the procedure for organizing sanatorium-resort treatment.

Palliative medical care for a patient with oncological diseases is provided in accordance with the regulations on organizing the provision of palliative medical care, including the procedure for interaction between medical organizations, social service organizations, and public associations and other non-profit organizations operating in the field of health protection.

If an oncological disease is suspected and/or detected in a patient during the provision of emergency medical care, the patient is transferred or referred to medical organizations providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases to determine management tactics and the need for additional other methods of specialized antitumor treatment.

Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization in an emergency or urgent form are:

1) the presence of complications of the oncological disease requiring the provision of specialized medical care in an emergency and urgent form;

2) presence of complications of treatment (surgical intervention, RT, drug therapy, etc.) of the oncological disease.

Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization in a planned form are:

1) the need to perform complex interventional diagnostic medical procedures requiring subsequent monitoring in an inpatient or day-hospital setting;

2) the presence of indications for specialized antitumor treatment (surgical intervention, RT, including contact, EBRD and other types of RT, drug therapy, etc.) requiring monitoring in an inpatient or day hospital setting.

Indications for discharging a patient from a medical organization are:

1) completion of a course of treatment or one of the stages of providing specialized, including high-tech, medical care in an inpatient or day hospital setting, provided there are no treatment complications requiring drug correction and/or medical interventions in an inpatient setting;

2) refusal of the patient or their legal representative from specialized, including high-tech, medical care in an inpatient or day hospital setting established by the multidisciplinary team of the medical organization providing cancer care, provided there are no complications of the underlying disease and/or treatment requiring drug correction and/or medical interventions in an inpatient setting;

3) in cases of non-compliance by the patient with prescriptions or the internal regulations of the medical and prophylactic institution, provided this does not threaten the patient's life and the health of others;

4) the need to transfer the patient to another medical organization according to the relevant medical specialty profile.

The conclusion on the advisability of transferring a patient to a specialized medical organization is made after a preliminary consultation on the provided medical documents and/or a preliminary examination of the patient by specialist physicians of the medical organization to which the transfer is planned.

7. Additional Information

Factors influencing the prognosis of the disease include:

- tumor size and extent;

- depth of invasion of the primary tumor;

- tumor grade;

- status of regional and peripheral lymph nodes;

- extent of cytoreductive surgery.

Patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer, especially of the 1st pathogenetic type, frequently present with obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and a number of other comorbid conditions that can worsen their general somatic status and limit the feasibility of radical treatment. Such patients may be offered palliative therapy based on medical indications, which has a less favorable impact on life expectancy and disease outcome [13].

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

№

Quality criteria

Criterion fulfillment

1

A pathomorphological examination of biopsy (surgical) material obtained from fractional diagnostic curettage of the uterine cavity and cervical canal and/or aspiration biopsy of the uterine cavity tissues at the diagnostic stage was performed

Yes/No

2

Abdominal ultrasound (comprehensive) and retroperitoneal ultrasound and/or abdominal CT and/or abdominal MRI performed at the diagnostic stage when parenchymal organ and lymph node involvement is suspected, or whole-body PET-CT with a tumorotropic radiopharmaceutical

Yes/No

3

Pelvic ultrasound (transvaginal and transabdominal) and/or pelvic MRI with IV contrast enhancement or pelvic CT performed (upon establishing the diagnosis)

Yes/No

4

Targeted chest X-ray and/or chest CT or whole-body PET-CT with a tumorotropic radiopharmaceutical performed (upon establishing the diagnosis)

Yes/No

5

Blood test for CA 125 tumor marker performed (upon establishing the diagnosis)

Yes/No

7

Routine pathomorphological examination of surgical (biopsy) material performed during surgical treatment

Yes/No

8

RT and/or CT and/or hormone therapy and/or targeted therapy performed if necessary and upon morphological verification of the diagnosis

Yes/No

References

Show references

1. Resnick K.E., Hampel H., Fishel R. et al. Current and emerging trends in Lynch syndrome identification in women with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 114(1): 128 - 34.

2. Van den Bosch T., Coosemans A., Morina M. et al. Screening for uterine tumours. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 26(2): 257 - 66.

3. Dinkelspiel H.E., Wright J.D., Lewin S.N. et al. Contemporary clinical management of endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013; 2013.

4. Bohman Ya.V. Rukovodstvo po onkoginekologii. M.: Meditsina. 1989. 325 p.

5. Zlokachestvennye novoobrazovaniya v Rossii v 2018 g. (zabolevaemost' i smertnost'). Ed. by A.D. Kaprin, V.V. Starinskiy, G.V. Petrova. M.: MNIOI im. P.A. Gertsena - filial FGBU "NMITs radiologii" Minzdrava Rossii, 2019. 250 p.

6. Kurman R.J., Carcangiu M.L., Harrington C.S., Young R.H. et al. WHO Classification of Tumors of the Female Reproductive Organs. Geneva. Switzerland: WHO Press. 2014. World Health Organization Classification of Tumors. 4th edn.

7. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009: 105(2): 103 - 4.

8. Amanta F., Mirzab M., Creutzbergc C. FIGO cancer report 2012. Cancer of the corpus uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2012; 119 (S 2): S110 - 7.

9. Colombo N., Preti E., Landoni F. et al. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2013; 24 (suppl_6): vi33 - 8.

10. Koskas M., Bendifallah S., Luton D. et al. Safety of uterine and/or ovarian preservation in young women with grade 1 intramucous endometrial adenocarcinoma: a comparison of survival according to the extent of surgery. Fertil Steril 2012; 98(5): 1229 - 35.

11. Chen Y., Ren Y.L., Li N. et al. Serum human epididymis protein 4 vs. carbohydrate antigen 125 and their combination for endometrial cancer diagnosis: a meta-analysis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016; 20(10): 1974 - 85.

12. E. Maheshwari, S. Nougaret, E. B. Stein et al Update on MRI in Evaluation and Treatment of Endometrial Cancer RadioGraphics 2022; 42:0000–0000 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.220070, Med Ultrason.2022 August 31;24 (3):348-355. doi: 10.11152 /mu-3246

13. Breitkopf D.M., Hopkins M.R., Laughlin-Tommaso S.K. et al. Direct aspiration endometrial biopsy via flexible hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012; 19(4): 490 - 3.

14. Kinkel K., Kaji Y., Yu K.K. et al. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology 1999; 212(3): 711 - 8.

15. Kitajima K., Suzuki K., Senda M. et al. Preoperative nodal staging of uterine cancer: is contrast-enhanced PET/CT more accurate than non-enhanced PET/CT or enhanced CT alone? Ann Nucl Med 2011; 25(7): 511 - 9.

16. Antonsen S.L., Jensen L.N., Loft A. et al. MRI. PET/CT and ultrasound in the preoperative staging of endometrial cancer - a multicenter prospective comparative study. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 128(2): 300 - 8.

17. Ortashi P., Jain S., Emannuel O. et al. Evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for staging endometrial cancer. A prospective study of 100 cases at the Dorset Cancer Centre. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008; 137(2): 232 - 5.

18. Fares R., Kehoe S., Shams N. Preoperative prediction of lymph nodal metastases in endometrial carcinoma: is it possible? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 28(2): 394 - 400.

19. Shah J.P., Bryant C.S., Kumar S. et al. Lymphadenectomy and Ovarian Preservation in Low-Grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112: 1102 - 8.

20. Kwon J.S., Scott J.L., Gilks C.B. et al. Testing women with endometrial cancer to detect Lynch syndrome. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(16): 2247 - 52.

21. Chang M.C., Chen J.H., Liang J.A. et al. 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81(11): 3511 - 7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.01.024.

22. Jiang H., Gupta R., Somma J. EZH2, a unique marker of malignancy in effusion cytology. Diagnc Cytopathol 2013; 42(2): 111 - 6. DOI: 10.1002/dc.22999.

23. Singh S., Resnick K.E. Lynch syndrome and endometrial cancer. South Med J 2017; 110(4): 265 - 9.

24. Wang H.L., Ren Y.F., Yang J. et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2013; 14(4): 2515 - 9.

25. Krill L.S., Bristow R.E. Robotic surgery: gynecologic oncology. Cancer J 2013; 19(2): 167 - 76.

26. Wright J.D., Buck A.M., Shah M. et al. Safety of ovarian preservation in premenopausal women with endometrial cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27(8): 1214 - 9.

27. ACOG practice bulletin, clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists, number 65. August 2005: management of endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106(2): 413 - 25.

28. Mourits M.J., Bijen C.B., Arts H.J. et al. Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11(8): 763 - 71.

29. Niazi T.M., Souhami L., Portelance L. et al. Long-term results of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in the primary treatment of medically inoperable stage I - II endometrial carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 63(4): 1108 - 13.

30. Fan Z., Li H., Hu R. et al. Fertility-preserving treatment in young women with grade 1 presumed stage IA endometrial adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018; 28(2): 385 - 93.

31. Wei J., Zhang W., Feng L., Gao W. Comparison of fertility-sparing treatments in patients with early endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96(37): e8034.

32. Gu H., Li J., Gu Y. et al. Survival impact of ovarian preservation on women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27(1): 77 - 84.

33. Lee B., Suh D.H., Kim K. et al. Influence of positive peritoneal cytology on prognostic factors and survival in early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn JClinOncolo 2016; 46(8): 711 - 7.

34. Lee T.S., Lee J.Y., Kim J.W. et al. Outcomes of ovarian preservation in a cohort of premenopausal women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 131(2): 289 - 93.

35. Xiu X.X., Wang H.L., Yun-Yi L. et al. Endometrial stromal sarcoma in combination with mixed type endometrial carcinomas: a case report and literature review. Medicine 2017; 96(49): e8928.

36. Kitchener H., Swart A.M., Qian O. et al. Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study. Lancet 2009; 373(9658): 125 - 36.

37. Benedetti Panici P., Basile S., Maneschi F. et al. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008; 100(23): 1707 - 16.

38. Concin N, Matias-Guiu X., Vergote I. et al.  ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021;31:12–39. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230

39. Van Wijk F.H., Huikeshoven F.J., Abdulkadir L. et al. Stage III and IV endometrial cancer: a 20-year review of patients. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16(4): 1648 - 55.

40. Huang C.Y., Ho C.M., Chen Y.L. et al. Impact of lymphadenectomy in uterine endometrioid carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39(4): 350 - 7.

41. Comert G.K., Turkmen O., Karalok A. et al. Therapy modalities, prognostic factors, and outcome of the primary cervical carcinosarcoma: meta-analysis of extremely rare tumor of cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27(9): 1957 - 69.

42. Roberts M.E., Aynardi J.T., Chu C.S. Uterine leiomyosarcoma: a review of the literature and update on management options. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 151(3) 562 - 72.

43. Minig L., Franchi D., Boveri S. et al. Progestin intrauterine device and GnRH analogue for uterus-sparing treatment of endometrial precancers and well-differentiated early endometrial carcinoma in young women. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 643 - 9.

44. Kim M.K., Ju. Seong Seok, Kim You Shin et al. Combined medroxyprogesterone acetate/levonorgestreleintrauterine system treatment in young women with early-stage endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209: 358.e1 - 4.

45. Si M., Jia L., Song K. et al. Role of lymphadenectomy for uterine sarcoma: a meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2017; 27(1): 109 - 16.

46. Sartori E., Gadducci A., Landoni F. et al. Clinical behavior of 203 stage II endometrial cancer cases: the impact of primary surgical approach and of adjuvant radiation therapy.

47. Boente M.P., Yordan E.L. Jr. McIntosh D.G. et al. Prognostic factors and long-term survival in endometrial adenocarcinoma with cervical involvement. Gynecol Oncol 1993; 51(3): 316 - 22.

48. Fishman D.A., Roberts K.B., Chambers J.T. et al. Radiation therapy as exclusive treatment for medically inoperable patients with stage I and II endometrioid carcinoma with endometrium. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 61(2): 189 - 96.

49. Coon P., Beriwal S., Heron D.E. et al. High-dose-rate Rotte "Y" applicator brachytherapy for definitive treatment of medically inoperable endometrial cancer: 10-year results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71(3): 779 - 83.

50. Matei D., Filiaci V., Randall M.E. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy plus radiation for locally advanced endometrial cancer. N Eng J Med 2019; 380(24): 2317 - 26.

51. Kong A., Johnson N., Kitchener H.C., Lawrie T.A. Adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I endometrial cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 2012(3): CD003916.

52. Roper B., Astner S.T., Heydemann-Obradovic A. et al. Ten-year data on 138 patients with endometrial carcinoma and postoperative vaginal brachytherapy alone: no need for external-beam radiotherapy in low and intermediate risk patients. Gynecol Oncol 2007; 107: 541 - 8.

53. Nout R.A., Putter H., Jurgenliemk-Schulz I.M. et al. Quality of life after pelvic radiotherapy or vaginal brachytherapy for endometrial cancer: first results of the randomized PORTEC-2 trial. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 3547 - 56.

54. Le T., Menard C. Samant R, et al. Longitudinal assessments of quality of life in endometrial cancer patients: effect of surgical approach and adjuvant radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 75: 795 - 802.

55. Klopp A., Smith B.D., Alektiar K. et al. The role of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer: executive summary of an american society for radiation oncology evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2014; 4: 137 - 44.

56. Elshaikh M.A., Al-Wahab Z., Mahdi H. et al. Recurrence patterns and survival endpoints in women with stage II uterine endometrioid carcinoma: a multi-institution study. Gynecol Oncol 2015; 136: 235 - 9.

57. Secord A.A., Havrilesky L.J., O'Malley D.M. et al. A multicenter evaluation of sequential multimodality therapy and clinical outcome for the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 114(3): 442 - 7.

58. Yamagami W., Susumu T. Makabe et al. Yamagami W. Is repeated high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) therapy permissible for patients with early stage endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia who desire preserving fertility? J Gynecol Oncol 2018; 29(2): e21.

59. Park J.Y., Kim D.Y., Kim J.H. et al. Long-term oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing management using oral progestin for young women with endometrial cancer (KGOG2002). Eur J Cancer 2013; 49: 868 - 74.

60. Berton-Rigaud D., Devouassoux-Shisheboran M., Ledermann J.A. et al. Gynecologic Cancer Inter Group (GCIG) Consensus Review for Uterine and Ovarian Carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2014; 24(9 Suppl 3): S55 - 60.

61. Fader A.N., Roque D.M., Siegel E. et al. Randomized phase II trial of carboplatin-paclitaxel versus carboplatin-paclitaxel-trastuzumab in uterine serous carcinomas that overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/neu. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36(20): 2044 - 51.

62. Nomura H., Aoki D., Michimae H. et al. Effect of taxane plus platinum regimens vs doxorubicin plus cisplatin as adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial cancer at a high risk of progression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5(6): 833 - 40.

63. Fleming G.F., Filiaci V.L., Bentley R.C. et al. Phase III randomized trial of doxorubicin + cisplatin versus doxorubicin + 24-h paclitaxel + filgrastim in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Ann Oncol 2004; 15(8): 1173 - 8.

64. Michener C.M., Peterson G., Kulp B. et al. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2005; 131(9): 581 - 4.

65. Greven K., Winter K., Underhill K. et al. Final analysis of RTOG 9708: adjuvant postoperative irradiation combined with cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy following surgery for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103(1): 155 - 9.

66. Dimopoulos M.A., Papadimitriou C.A., Georgoulias V. et al. Paclitaxel and cisplatin in advanced or recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium: long-term results of a phase II multicenter study. Gynecol Oncol 2000; 78(1): 52 - 7.

67. Cella D., Huang H., Homesley H.D. et al. Patient-reported peripheral neuropathy of doxorubicin and cisplatin with and without paclitaxel in the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer: Results from GOG 184. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 119: 538 - 42.

68. Fleming G.F., Brunetto V.L., Cella D. et al. Phase III trial of doxorubicin plus cisplatin with or without paclitaxel plus filgrastim in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2159 - 66.

69. Miller D., Filiaci V., Fleming G. et al. Late-breaking abstract 1: Randomized phase III noninferiority trial of first line chemotherapy for metastatic or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynec Oncol 2012; 125(3): 771. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.03.034.

70. Fiorica J.V., Brunetto V.L., Hanjani P. et al. Phase II trial of alternating courses of megestrol acetate and tamoxifen in advanced endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 92: 10 - 4.

71. Altman A.P., Thompson J., Nelson G. et al. Use of aromatase inhibitors as first- and second-line medical therapy in patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2012; 34: 664 - 72.

72. Judson I., Radford J.A., Harris M. et al. Randomized phase II trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (DOXIL/CAELYX) versus doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a study by the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37(7): 870 - 7.

73. Hensley M.L., Blessing J.A., Mannel R., Rose P.G. Fixed-dose rate gemcitabine plus docetaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II trial. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 109(3): 329 - 34.

74. Homesley H.D., Filiaci V., Markman M. et al. Phase III trial of ifosfamide with or without paclitaxel in advanced uterine carcinosarcoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(5): 526 - 31.

75. Sutton G., Kauderer J., Carson L.F. et al. Adjuvant ifosfamide and cisplatin in patients with completely resected stage I or II carcinosarcomas (mixed mesodermal tumors) of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 96(3): 630 - 4.

76. Zhang Y., Zhao D., Gong C. et al. Prognostic role of hormone receptors in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol 2015; 13(1): 208.

77. Decruze S.B., Green J.A. Hormone therapy in advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer: a systematic review. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2007; 17: 964 - 78.

78. Ethier J.L., Desautels D.N., Amir E., MacKay H. Is hormonal therapy effective in advanced endometrial cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 147(1): 158 - 66. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.002.

79. Thigpen J.T., Brady M.F., Alvarez R.D. et al. Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a dose-response study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17(6): 1736 - 44.

80. Thigpen T., Brady M.F., Homesley H.D. et al. Tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19(2): 364 - 7.

81. Barker L.C., Brand I.R., Crawford S.M. Sustained effect of the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole on endometrial thickness in patients with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25(5): 1105 - 9.

82. Lindemann K., Malander S., Christensen R.D. et al. Examestane in advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a prospective phase II study by the Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NSGO). BMC Cancer 2014; 14(1): 68.

83. Reed N.S., Mangioni C.,  H. et al. Phase III randomised study to evaluate the role of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in the treatment of uterine sarcomas stages I and II: An European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gynaecological Cancer Group Study (protocol 55874). Eur J Cancer 2008; 44(6): 808 - 18.

84. Sutton G., Blessing J.A., Malfetano J.H. Ifosfamide and doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 1996; 62(2): 226 - 9.

85. Zalupski M., Metch B., Balcerzak S. et al. Phase III comparison of doxorubicin and dacarbazine given by bolus versus infusion in patients with soft-tissue sarcomas: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991; 83(13): 926 - 32.

86. Garcia-Del-Muro X., Lopez-Pousa A., Maurel J. et al. Randomized phase II study comparing gemcitabine plus dacarbazine versus dacarbazine alone in patients with previously treated soft tissue sarcoma: a Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas study. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29(18): 2528 - 33.

87. Dileo P., Morgan J., Zahrieh D. et al. Gemcitabine and vinorel-bine combination chemotherapy for patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer 2007; 109(9): 1863 - 9.

88. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines(R)) for Uterine Neoplasms V1.2018. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine.pdf. Accessed March 21, 2018.

89. Judson I., Verweij J., Gelderblom H. et al. Doxorubicin alone versus intensified doxorubicin plus ifosfamide for first-line treatment of advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2014; 15(4): 415 - 23.

90. Hensley M.L., Maki R., Venkatraman E. et al. Gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with unresectable leiomyosarcoma: results of a phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(12): 2824 - 31.

91. Miller D.S., Blessing J.A., Lentz S.S., Waggoner S.E. A phase II trial of topotecan in patients with advanced, persistent, or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study. Gynecol Oncol 2002; 87: 247 - 51.

92. Dizon D.S. Treatment options for advanced endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 2010; 117(2): 373 - 81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.02.007.

93. Escobar P.F., Markman M., Zanotti K. et al. Phase 2 trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in advanced endometrial cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2003; 129(11): 651 - 4.

94. Fracasso P.M., Blessing J.A., Molpus K.L. et al. Phase II study of oxaliplatin as second-line chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103(2): 523 - 6.

95. Markman M., Blessing J., Rubin S.C. et al. Phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) in platinum and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 101(3): 436 - 40.

96. Homesley H.D., Meltzer N.P., Nieves L. et al. A phase II trial of weekly 1-hour paclitaxel as second-line therapy for endometrial and cervical cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2008; 13(1): 62 - 5.

97. Lissoni A., Zanetta G., Losa G. et al. Phase II study of paclitaxel as salvage treatment in advanced endometrial cancer. Ann Oncol 1996; 7(8): 861 - 3.

98. Lincoln S., Blessing J.A., Lee R.B., Rocereto T.F. Activity of paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 88(3): 277 - 81.

99. Marabelle A., Le D.T., Ascierto P.A. et al. Efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with noncolorectal high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient cancer: results from the phase II KEYNOTE-158 Study. JCO 2020; 38(1): 1 - 10.

100. Makker V., Rasco D., Vogelzang N.J. et al. Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer; an interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet 2019; 20(5): 711 - 8.

101. Sutton G.P., Blessing J.A., Homesley H.D. et al. Phase II study of ifosfamide and mesna in refractory adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Cancer 1994; 73(5): 1453 - 5.

102. Muggia F.M., Blessing J.A., Sorosky J., Reid G.C. Phase II trial of the pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in previously treated metastatic endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 2360 - 4.

103. Mouridsen H.T., Bastholt L., Somers R. et al. Adriamycin versus epirubicin in advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A randomized phase II/phase III study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1987; 23(10): 1477 - 83.

104. Sutton G.P., Blessing J.A., Barrett R.J. et al. Phase II trial of ifosfamide and mesna in leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992; 166(2): 556 - 9.

105. Amant F., Coosemans A., Debiec-Rychter M. et al. Clinical management of uterine sarcomas. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10(12): 1188 - 98.

106. van der Graaf W.T., Blay J.Y., Chawla S.P. et al. Pazopanib for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (PALETTE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2012; 379(9829): 1879 - 86.

107. Demetri G.D., Chawla S.P., von Mehren M. et al. Efficacy and safety of trabectedin in patients with advanced or metastatic liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma after failure of prior anthra-cyclines and ifosfamide: results of a randomized phase II study of two different schedules. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27(25): 4188 - 96.

108. Muggia F., Blessing J.A., Method M. Evaluation of vinorelbine in persistent or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 92(2): 639 - 40.

109. Garcia A.A., Blessing J.A., Nolte S., Mannel R.S. A phase II evaluation of weekly docetaxel in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma: a study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111(1): 22 - 6.

110. Blay J.Y.,  P., Bauer S. et al. Eribulin versus dacarbazine in patients with leiomyosarcoma: subgroup analysis from a phase 3, open-label, randomised study. British J Cancer 2019; 120(11): 1026 - 32.

111. Look K.Y., Sandler A., Blessing J.A. et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine as secondline chemotherapy of uterine leiomyosarcoma: a Gynaecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Study. Gynaecol Oncol 2004; 92: 644 - 7.

112. Urmancheeva A.F., Ulrikh E.A. Printsipy lecheniya sarkom matki. Prakticheskaya onkologiya 2008; 9(3): 132 - 6.

113. Temkin S.M., Fleming G. Current treatment of metastatic endometrial cancer. Cancer Control 2009; 16(1): 38.

114. Farmakoterapiya opukholey. Ed. by A.N. Stukov, M.A. Blank, T.Yu. Semiglazova, A.M. Belyaev. Saint Petersburg: Voprosy onkologii, 2017. 512 p.

115. Anderson S., Aghajanian C. Temozolomide in uterine leiomyosarcomas. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 98(1): 99 - 103.

116. Morgan J.A., Cesne A.L., Chawla S.M. et al. Randomized phase II study of trabectedin in patients with liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma (Lsarcomas) after failure of prior anthracylines (A) and ifosfamide (I). J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(18S): 10060.

117. Ulrich E.A. Specifics of uterine sarcoma treatment. Prakticheskaya onkologiya 2013; 14(2): 127 - 34.

118. Jhingran A., Burke T.W., Eifel P.J. Definitive radiotherapy for patients with isolated vaginal recurrence of endometrial carcinoma after hysterectomy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Physics 2003; 56(5): 1366 - 72.

119. Campagnutta E., Giorda G., De Piero G. et al. Surgical treatment of recurrent endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 100(1): 89 - 96.

120. Vargo J.A., Kim H., Houser C.J. et al. Definitive salvage for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer: the impact of modern intensity-modulated-radiotherapy with image-based HDR brachytherapy and the interplay of the PORTEC 1 risk stratification. Radiother Oncol 2014; 113(1): 126 - 31.

121. Havrilesky L.J., Cragun J.M., Calingaert B. et al. Resection of lymph node metastases influences survival in stage IIIC endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 99(3): 689 - 95.

122. Dowdy S.C., Mariani A., Cliby W.A. et al. Radical pelvic resection and intraoperative radiation therapy for recurrent endometrial cancer: technique and analysis of outcomes. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 101(2): 280 - 6.

123. Vale C.L., Tierney J., Bull S.J., Symonds P.R. Chemotherapy for advanced, recurrent or metastatic endometrial carcinoma. Cochrane Database SystRev 2012; 2012(8): CD003915.

124. Jenabi E., Poorolajal J. The effect of body mass index on endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Public Health 2015; 129(7): 872 - 80.

125. Emons G., Steiner E., Vordermark D. et al. Interdisciplinary diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of patients with endometrial cancer. Guideline (S3-Level, AWMF Registry Number 032/034-OL, April 2018) - Part 2 with Recommendations on the therapy and follow-up of endometrial cancer, palliative care, psycho-oncological/psychosocial care/rehabilitation/patient information and healthcare facilities. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78(11): 1089 - 109. DOI: 10.1055/a-0715-2964.

126. Oken M.M., Creech R.H., Tormey D.C. et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982; 5(6): 649 - 55.

127. Kamofsky D.A., Burchenal J.H. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. Ed.: C. MacLeod. New York: Columbia University Press, 1949. Pp. 191 - 205.

128. E. Maheshwari, S. Nougaret, E. B. Stein et al Update on MRI in Evaluation and Treatment of Endometrial Cancer RadioGraphics 2022; 42:0000–0000 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.220070;

129.Lin MY, Dobrotwir A, McNally O, Abu-Rustum NR, Narayan K. Role of imaging in the routine management of endometrial cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018;143(Suppl 2):109–117.

46

130. BioMed Research International Volume 2017, Article ID 1318203, 10 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1318203

131. European Radiology (2019) 29:792–805 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5515-y; Yamagami, W.; Mikami, M.; Nagase, S. et al. Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2018 guidelines for treatment of uterine body neoplasms. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2020, 31, e18; Network, N.C.C.N Uterine Neoplasm (Version 3.2021). Available online: https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/uterine_blocks.pdf (accessed on 3 June 2021);

132. Hamilton, C.A.; Pothuri, B.; Arend, R.C.; Backes, F.J.; Gehrig, P.A.; Soliman, P.T.; Thompson, J.S.; Urban, R.R.; Burke, W.M. Endometrial cancer: A society of gynecologic oncology evidence-based review and recommendations, part II. Gynecol. Oncol. 2021, 160, 827–834

133. Chen W.C., Hsu, L.T. Huang Y.T. et al  Prediction of Myometrial Invasion in Stage I Endometrial Cancer by MRI: The Influence of Surgical Diagnostic Procedure. Cancers 2021, 13, 3275. https://doi.org/10.3390.

134. Nougaret S, Horta M, Sala E, et al. Endometrial Cancer MRI staging: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol 2019;29(2):792–805;

135.Sala E, Rockall A, Rangarajan D, Kubik-Huch RA. The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the female pelvis. Eur J Radiol 2010;76(3):367–385;

136. Rockall AG, Qureshi M, Papadopoulou I et al (2016) Role of imaging in fertility-sparing treatment of gynecologic malignancies. Radiographics 36(7):2214–2233;

137. McEvoy SH, Nougaret S, Abu-Rustum NR et al (2017) Fertilitysparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: how MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42(10):2488–2512

138. Be´lissant O, Champion L, Thevenet H, Weinmann P, Alberini JL. Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in the staging, restaging, monitoring of response to therapy and surveillance of uterine leiomyosarcomas. Nucl Med Commun 2018;39(7): 652e8.

139. Lee JW, Park JY, Lee HJ, Lee JJ, Moon SH, Kang SY, et al. Preoperative [(18)F]FDG PET/CT tumour heterogeneity index in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a multicentre retrospective study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag 2018;45(8):1309e16.

140. Uccella S, Morris JM, Bakkum-Gamez JN, Keeney GL,Podratz KC, Mariani A. Bone metastases in endometrialcancer: report on 19 patients and review ofthe medical lit-erature. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130(3):474-482

141. DETECTION OF SENTINEL LYMPH NODES USING INDOCYANINE GREEN (ICG) IN PATIENTS WITH ENDOMETRIAL CANCER Ibragimov Z.N., Mikaya N.A., Trifanov Yu.N., Gorodnova T.V., Kotiv Kh.B., Yakovleva M.G., Lavrinovich O.E., Bondarev N.E., Sidoruk A.A., Smirnova O.A., Huseynov K.D., Bakhidze E.V., Meshkova I.E., Bakaeva E.Kh., Shikhzadaeva M.G., Ulrich E.A., Urmancheeva A.F., Berlev I.V., Belyaev A.M. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya. 2020. No. S1. P. 105-111.

142. DETECTION OF SENTINEL LYMPH NODES IN PATIENTS WITH GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER Kolomiyets L.A., Chernyshova A.L., Chernov V.I., Perelmuter V.M., Pankova O.V. Video guide for physicians. Electronic edition / Tomsk, 2022.

143. Sentinel lymph node for endometrial cancer treatment: review of the literature. Zorzato PC, Bosco M, Franchi MP, Mariani A, Cianci S, Garzon S, Uccella S.Minerva Med. 2021 Feb;112(1):70-80. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.20.07117-7. Epub 2020 Nov 16.PMID: 33198443 Review.

144. Ronsini C. et al. The role of adjuvant therapy for the treatment of micrometastases in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Journal of Clinical Medicine. – 2024. – Vol. 13. – No. 5. – P. 1496.

145. Zhao F. et al. Effect of adjuvant therapy on the prognosis in stage I/II uterine carcinosarcoma: A meta‐analysis //Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research. – 2021. – Vol. 47. – №. 7. – P. 2473-2480.146. Nechushkina V.M., Kolomiets L.A., Kravets O.A., Morkhov K.Yu., Novikova E.G., Novikova O.V. et al. Practical guidelines for the drug treatment of uterine body cancer and uterine sarcomas. RUSSCO Practical Guidelines, part 1. Zlokachestvennye opukholi, 2023 (vol. 13), #3s2, pp. 263–279.

147. Anderson S. E. et al. A retrospective analysis of vinorelbine chemotherapy for patients with previously treated soft‐tissue sarcomas //Sarcoma. – 2006. – Vol. 2006. – №. 1. – P. 015947.

148. Silver J.A., Baima J. Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatmen-trelated morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2103; 92: 715–727.

149. Nilsson H., Angeras U., Bock D., Börjesson M., Onerup A., Fagevik Olsen M., et al. Is preoperative physical activity related to post-surgery recovery? BMJ Open. 2016; 6(1): e007997. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007997

150. Zhou Y., et al. Body mass index, physical activity, and mortality in women diag-nosed with ovarian cancer: results from the Women's Health Initiative. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 133(1): 4–10.

151. Hijazi Y., Gondal U., Aziz O. A systematic review of prehabilitation programs in abdominal cancer surgery. Int J Surg. 2017 Mar;39:156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.111. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

152. Silver J.K., Baima J. Cancer prehabilitation: An opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;92:715–27.

153. Tsimopoulou I., Pasquali S., Howard R., Desai A., Gourevitch D., Tolosa I., Vohra R. Psychological Prehabilitation Before Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg On-col. 2015 Dec;22(13):4117-23. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4550-z. Epub 2015 Apr 14.

154. Carter J. Fast-Track Surgery in Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology: A Review of a Rolling Clinical Audit. ISRN Surgery. Vol. 2012, Article ID 368014, 19 p., 2012.

155. Nelson G., Bakkum-Gamez J., Kalogera E., et al Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations – 2019 update International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer Published Online First: 15 March 2019. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000356

156. De Almeida E.P.M., De Almeida J.P., Landoni G., Galas F.R.B.G., Fukushima J.T., Fominskiy E., et al. Early mobilization programme improves functional capacity after major abdominal cancer surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Brit J Anaesth 2017; 119 (5): 900–907.

157. Wren S.M., Martin M., Yoon J.K., Bech F. Postoperative pneumonia-prevention program for the inpatient surgical ward // Journal of the American College of Surgeons. – 2010. – Vol. 210, No. 4 – Pp. 491–495.

158. Peedicayil A., Weaver A., Li X., Carey E., Cliby W., Mariani A. Incidence and timing of venous thromboembolism after surgery for gynecological cancer // Gynecol Oncol. – 2011. – Vol. 121, No. 1. – Pp. 64–69.

159. Swarm R., Abernethy A.P., Anghelescu D.L. et al. NCCN Adult Cancer Pain. Adult cancer pain. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2010;8: 1046–1086.

160. Ben-Arye E., Samuels N., Lavie O. Integrative Medicine for Female Patients with Gynecologic Cancer // The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine. – Vol. 24, No. 9–10.

161. Goerling U., Jaeger C., Walz A., et al. The efficacy of psycho-oncological interven-tions for women with gynaecological cancer: A randomized study // Oncology. 2014;87:114–124. Crossref, Medline.

162. Smits A., Lopes A., Bekkers R., et al. Body mass index and the quality of life of endometrial cancer survivors – a systematic review and meta-analysis // Gynecol Oncol 2015;137:180–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.540

163. Schmitz K.H., Courneya K.S., Matthews C., et al. American College of Sports Medicine roundtable on exercise guidelines for cancer survivors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2010; 42: 1409–26.

164. Biglia N., Zanfagnin V., Daniele A., Robba E., Bounous V.E. Lower Body Lymphedema in Patients with Gynecologic Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2017; 37(8): 4005–15.

165. Shaitelman S.F., Cromwell K.D., Rasmussen J.C., Stout N.L., Armer J.M., Lasinski B.B., Cormier J.N. Recent progress in the treatment and prevention of cancer-related lymphedema. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):55-81. doi: 10.3322/caac.21253. Epub 2014 Nov 19. Erratum in: CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 May–Jun; 65(3): 252. PMID: 25410402.

166 Borman Р. Lymphedema diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up from the view point of physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists. Turk J Phys Med Rehab 2018;64(3):179–197.

167. Piller N., Douglass J., Heidenreich B., Moseley A. Placebo controlled trial of mild electrical stimulation. Journal of Lymphoedema. – 2010. – Vol 5, No 1. – P. 15–25.

168. Grushina T.I. Rehabilitation in Oncology: Physiotherapy. – Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2006. – 240 p.

169. McNeely M.L., Peddle C.J., Yurick J.L., Dayes I.S., Mackey J.R. Conservative and dietary interventions for cancer‐related lymphedema: A Systematic review and meta‐analysis. Cancer. 2011 Mar 15;117(6):1136–48.

170. Zhang Y.L., Huiling L., Yan L., Li H., Tian В. Effects of acupuncture on cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis // Supportive Care in Cancer. – 2018. – V. 26, Issue 2. – P. 415–425.

171. Huffman L.B., Hartenbach E.M., Carter J., Rash J.K., Kushner D.M. Maintaining sexual health throughout gynecologic cancer survivorship: A comprehensive review and clini-cal guide. Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):359-68. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.010. Epub 2015 Nov 7. PubMed PMID: 26556768; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4835814.

172. Carmody J.F., Crawford S., Salmoirago-Blotcher E., Leung K., Churchill L., Olendzki N. Mindfulness training for coping with hot flashes: results of a randomized trial. Menopause. 2011 June;18(6):611–20. DOI: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318204a05c.

173. Ferrandina G., Petrillo M., Mantegna G., Fuoco G., Terzano S., Venditti L., et al. Evaluation of quality of life and emotional distress in endometrial cancer patients: a 2-year prospective, longitudinal study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Jun;133(3):518-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.015.

174. Armbruster S.D., Song J., Bradford A. et al. Sexual health of endometrial cancer survivors before and after a physical activity intervention: A retrospective cohort analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2016;143:589–595. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar.

175. Lawvere, Silvana. (2002). The effect of massage therapy in ovarian cancer patients. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7234-3217-3.50009-0

176. Hu H., Xie Z.G., Qin W.L. Effect of electroacupuncture intervention at different phases of post-operation on bladder function in patients undergoing cervical cancer operation. Zhen Ci Yan Jiu 2013;38:64–67, 77. Medline, Google Scholar.

177. Cannioto R.A., Moysich K.B. Epithelial ovarian cancer and recreational physical activity: A review of the epidemiological literature and implications for exercise prescription. Gynecol Oncol, 2015. 137(3): P. 559–73.

178. Hu M., Lin W. Effects of exercise training on red blood cell production: implications for anemia. Acta Haematol. 2012;127(3):156–64. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

179. Mustian K.M., Alfano C.M., Heckler C.. et al. Comparison of pharmaceutical, psy-chological, and exercise treatments for cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:961–968.

180. Kinkead B., Schettler P.J., Larson E.R., Carroll D., Sharenko M., Nettles J., et al. Massage therapy decreases cancer-related fatigue: Results from a randomized early phase trial. Cancer. 2018 Feb 1;124(3):546–554. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31064.

181. Streckmann F., Zopf E.M., Lehmann H.C. et al: Exercise intervention studies in patients with peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review. Sports Med 2014;44:1289–1304.

182. Kleckner I.R., Kamen C., Gewandter J.S., et al. Effects of exercise during chemo-therapy on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a multicenter, randomized con-trolled trial. Support Care Cancer 2018;26:1019–1028.

183. Rick O., von Hehn U., Mikus E., Dertinger H., Geiger G. Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics-induced polyneuropathy: A prospective randomized pla-cebo-controlled phase-III study. Bioelectromagnetics 2016; 38(2): 85–94. 

184. Luchini, C. et al. ESMO recommendations on microsatellite instability testing for immunotherapy in cancer, and its relationship with PD-1/PD-L1 expression and tumour mutational burden: a systematic review-based approach Annals of Oncology, Volume 30, Issue 8, 1232 – 1243

185. Yukio Suzuki et al. Long-term survival outcomes for hormonal therapy in premenopausal patients with clinical stage I endometrial cancer.. JCO 42, 5508-5508(2024).

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.5508

186. R. N. Eskander, M. W. Sill et al. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Cancer--N Engl J Med 388;23 nejm.org 2023;388:2159-2170

DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302312 VOL. 388 NO. 2

187. Westin S, et al. durvalumab plus carboplatin/paclitaxel followed by maintenance durvalumab with or without Olaparib as first- line treatment for advanced endometrial cancer: The Phase III DUO-E trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct 21: JCO2302132.doi:10.1200/JCO.23.02132

188. García-Del-Muro X, López-Pousa A et al. Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas. Randomized phase II study comparing gemcitabine plus dacarbazine versus dacarbazine alone in patients with previously treated soft tissue sarcoma: a Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas study. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 20;29(18):2528-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.33.6107. Epub 2011 May 23. PMID: 21606430.

188. Tryakin A.A., Besova N.S., Volkov N.M., Gladkov O.A., Karaseva V.V., Sakaeva D.D. et al. General principles of antitumor drug therapy. RUSSCO Practical Guidelines, part 1. Malignant Tumours, 2023 (vol. 13), #3s2, pp. 28–41.

189. Serkies K, Baczkowska-Waliszewska Z. Adjuvant vaginal cuff brachytherapy in surgically treated endometrial carcinoma patients - in view of the recent evidence. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2021 Apr;13(2):221-230. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2021.105291. Epub 2021 Apr 14. PMID: 33897797; PMCID: PMC8060967.

190. Lancellotta V, De Felice F et al.The role of vaginal brachytherapy in stage I endometrial serous cancer: a systematic review. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020 Feb;12(1):61-66. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2020.92698. Epub 2020 Feb 28. PMID: 32190072; PMCID: PMC7073340.

191. Shen JL, O'Connor KW, Moni J, Zweizig S, Fitzgerald TJ, Ko EC. Definitive Radiation Therapy for Medically Inoperable Endometrial Carcinoma. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Oct 25;8(1):101003. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101003. PMID: 36711065; PMCID: PMC9873494.

192. Meric -Bernstam F et al. Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with HER2- expressing solid tumors: primary results from the DESTINY-Pan Tumor02, phase 2 trial. ( J Clin Oncol. 2023. Doi: 10.1200|JCO.23.02005

193. Bagrova S.G. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in the prevention of febrile neutropenia. /Effective Pharmacotherapy. /No. 31, -2015/ Electronic access [https://umedp.ru/upload/iblock/278/bagrova.pdf]

194. Nechushkina V.M., Kolomiets L.A., Kravets O.A. et al. Uterine corpus cancer and uterine sarcomas. RUSSCO Practical Guidelines, part 1.2. Malignant Tumours 2024;14(3s2):165–188

195. Montilla-Soler JL, Makanji R. Skeletal Scintigraphy. Cancer Control. 2017 Apr;24(2):137-146. doi: 10.1177/107327481702400206. PMID: 28441368.

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

  1. Ashrafyan L.A., Academician of the RAS, MD, PhD, Professor, Deputy Director of the V.I. Kulakovo National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Director of the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology.

  2. Novikova E.G., MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Oncogynecology Department, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  3. Khokhlova S.V., MD, PhD, Head of the Oncological Department of Antitumor Drug Therapy, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  4. Urmancheeva A.F., MD, PhD, Professor, Leading Researcher at the Department of Oncogynecology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  5. Berlev I.V., MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Scientific Department of Oncogynecology, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  6. Antonova I.B., MD, PhD, Head of the Laboratory for Prevention, Early Diagnosis and Combined Treatment of Oncological Diseases, Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenology and Radiology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  7. Babaeva N.A., MD, PhD, Leading Researcher at the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, Oncologist at the Oncological Department of Surgical Treatment Methods, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  8. Aleshikova O.I., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, Oncologist at the Oncological Department of Surgical Treatment Methods, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  9. Orlov A.E., MD, PhD, Chief Physician of the Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary, Chief Freelance Oncologist of the Ministry of Health of the Samara Region, Head of the Department of Public Health and Healthcare of the Institute of Professional Education, Samara State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  10. Shchukin V.Yu., Head of the Oncological Department (Oncogynecology), Samara Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary

  11. Mukhtarullina S.V., MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Oncogynecology, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  12. Verenikina E.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Oncogynecology, Rostov Research Oncology Institute of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  13. Demidova L.V., MD, PhD, Leading Researcher at the Department of Radiation Therapy, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  14. Shevchuk A.S., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Combined and Radiation Treatment Methods for Oncogynecological Diseases, Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  15. Ulrikh E.A., MD, PhD, Professor, Chief Researcher at the Research Laboratory of Reproductive Technologies, Head of the "Oncofertility" Competence Center, V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center.

  16. Krasilnikov S.E., MD, PhD, Professor, Director of the Institute of Oncology and Neurosurgery, Oncologist, E.N. Meshalkin National Medical Research Center of the Russian Ministry of Health

  17. Davydova I.Yu., MD, PhD, Leading Researcher at the Department of Pelvic Floor Oncosurgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center named after A.S. Loginov of the Moscow Healthcare Department

  18. Krikunova L.I., MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Radiation and Combined Treatment Methods for Gynecological Diseases, National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  19. Kolomiets L.A., MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Gynecological Department, Research Institute of Oncology, Tomsk National Research Medical Center of the RAS.

  20. Kreynina Yu.M., MD, PhD, Leading Researcher at the Laboratory of Innovative Technologies of Radiotherapy and Chemoradiation Treatment of Malignant Neoplasms, Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenology and Radiology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  21. Dubinina A.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Radiotherapy Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health

  22. Karseladze A.I., Professor, MD, PhD, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  23. Rubtsova N.A., MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Radiologist, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health

  24. Bychenko V.G., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  25. Solopova A.E., MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Radiologist at the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  26. Ryzhkova D.V., MD, PhD, Professor of the RAS, Head of the Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiation Technologies with Clinic, Chief Researcher at the Research Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Center of the Russian Ministry of Health. Ovodenko D.L., MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Innovative Oncology and Gynecology, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health. Grinevich V.N., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Oncopathology, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  27. Snegovoy A.V., MD, PhD, Head of the Outpatient Chemotherapy Day Hospital Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  28. Meshcheryakova L.A., MD, PhD, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine named after Yu.M. Lopukhin of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency

  29. Slonov A.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Chief Physician of Clinical Hospital No. 123, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine named after Yu.M. Lopukhin of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency

  30. Rumyantsev A.A., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Antitumor Drug Therapy Department No. 4 of the Drug Treatment Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow

  31. Yureneva S.V., Deputy Director for Science at the Institute of Oncogynecology and Mammology, V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology of the Russian Ministry of Health, MD, PhD, Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Medical Rehabilitation Section:

  1. Konchugova T.V., MD, PhD, Professor, Physiotherapist, Head of the Department of Preformed Physical Factors, National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  2. Eremushkin M.A., MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Exercise Therapy and Clinical Biomechanics, National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  3. Gilmutdinova I.R., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Biomedical Technologies and Cell Technologies Laboratory, Transfusiologist, Dermatovenerologist, Cell Technology Specialist, National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  4. Filonenko E.V., MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Center for Laser and Photodynamic Diagnostics and Tumor Therapy, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health, Oncologist.

  5. Bulanov A.A., MD, PhD, Senior Researcher at the Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Chemotherapy, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  6. Butenko A.V., MD, PhD, Professor, Chief Physician of the Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chairman of the Scientific Council of the Association of Oncological Rehabilitation Specialists.

  7. Nazarenko A.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Highest Qualification Category Physician, Head of the Radiology Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Therapeutic Radiation Oncologists (RATRO), European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO), Russian-American Cancer Alliance (ARCA), Russian Representative to the IAEA.

  8. Obukhova O.A., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Physiotherapist, Head of the Rehabilitation Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), Russian Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (RESPEN).

  9. Khulamkhanova M.M., Physiotherapist, Oncologist at the Rehabilitation Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  10. Tkachenko G.A., Psychologist at the Rehabilitation Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  11. Petrova T.A., Speech Therapist and Educator at the Rehabilitation Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  12. Semiglazova T.Yu., MD, PhD, Leading Researcher at the Scientific Department of Innovative Methods of Therapeutic Oncology and Rehabilitation, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Associate Professor at the Department of Oncology, I.I. Mechnikov North-Western State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  13. Ponomarenko G.N., MD, PhD, Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Director General of the G.A. Albrecht Federal Scientific Center of Rehabilitation of the Disabled of the Russian Ministry of Labour, Head of the Department of Balneology and Physiotherapy, S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Russian Ministry of Defense.

  14. Kovlen D.V., MD, PhD, Associate Professor at the Department of Balneology and Physiotherapy, S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy of the Russian Ministry of Defense.

  15. Kasparov B.S., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Deputy Chief Physician for Outpatient Care, Head of the Clinical and Diagnostic Department, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  16. Krutov A.A., Oncologist at the Clinical and Diagnostic Department, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health.

  17. Zernova M.A., Exercise Therapy Instructor, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health.

  18. Kondratyeva K.O., Medical Psychologist, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health.

  19. Rumyantsev A.A., PhD, Head of the Antitumor Drug Therapy Department No. 4, Department of Drug Treatment, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow.

  20. Ivanova G.E., DSc, Chief Specialist in Medical Rehabilitation, Russian Ministry of Health; Head of the Department of Medical and Social Stroke Rehabilitation, Research Institute of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Rehabilitation, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Russian Ministry of Health.

  21. Romanov A.I., Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, DSc, Professor, Chief Physician, Rehabilitation Center, Administration of the President of the Russian Federation.

  22. Stepanova A.M., Deputy Director for Science, Head of the Rehabilitation Department, Vosstanovlenie Private Multidisciplinary Diagnostic and Rehabilitation Center.

Healthcare Organization Section:

  1. Nevolskikh A.A., DSc, Professor, Deputy Director for Clinical Work, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the National Medical Research Center for Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.

  2. Khaylova Zh.V., PhD, Chief Physician of the Clinic, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the National Medical Research Center for Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.

  3. Ivanov S.A., DSc, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – Branch of the National Medical Research Center for Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.

  4. Gevorkyan T.G., Deputy Director of the Research Institute of Clinical and Economic Radiology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology.

No conflict of interest declared.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience for these clinical guidelines:

  • oncologists;

  • surgeons;

  • radiologists;

  • medical students, resident physicians, clinical residents, and postgraduate students.

Methods used for collecting/selecting evidence: search in electronic databases; analysis of current scientific developments on the issue of uterine corpus cancer in Russia and abroad; generalization of practical experience of Russian and foreign specialists.

Table 1. Scale for grading the levels of evidence for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

Level of evidence

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference-method control, or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design except randomized controlled trials incorporating meta-analysis

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

Table 2. Scale for grading the levels of evidence for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

Level of evidence

Definition

1

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, excluding randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

Table 3. Scale for grading the grades of recommendation for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

Grade of Recommendation

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Methods used for formulating recommendations: expert consensus.

Economic analysis

Cost analysis was not performed, and pharmacoeconomic publications were not analyzed.

Method of recommendation validation:

  • external expert review;

  • internal expert review.

Description of the recommendation validation method

The draft of these recommendations was reviewed by independent experts who were asked to comment primarily on whether the interpretation of the evidence underlying the recommendations is easy to understand.

Comments were received from primary care oncologists regarding the clarity of the presentation of the recommendations and their assessment of importance as a working tool in daily practice.

The comments received from experts were carefully systematized and discussed by the chairman and members of the working group. Each item was discussed, and the resulting changes to the recommendations were recorded. If no changes were made, the reasons for refusing to make changes were recorded.

Consultations and expert review: the draft recommendations were also reviewed by independent experts, who were asked to comment primarily on the clarity and accuracy of the interpretation of the evidence base underlying the recommendations.

For the final editing and quality control, the guidelines were re-analyzed by the members of the working group, who concluded that all comments and feedback from the experts had been taken into account, and the risk of systematic bias in the development of the guidelines was minimized.

Updates of clinical guidelines: updating is carried out at least once every 3 years, taking into account new information on the diagnosis and management of patients with uterine corpus cancer, but no more frequently than once every 6 months. The decision to update is made by the Russian Ministry of Health based on proposals submitted by medical professional non-profit organizations. The formulated proposals must take into account the results of a comprehensive assessment of medicines and medical devices, as well as the results of clinical approbation.

When selecting publications as potential sources of evidence, the methodology used in each study is examined to ensure its reliability. The result of this examination affects the level of evidence assigned to the publication, which in turn affects the strength of the recommendations derived from it.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

Current instructions for the medicinal products mentioned in these clinical guidelines can be found on the website http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Flowchart for the diagnosis and treatment of a patient diagnosed with uterine corpus cancer

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms — Uterine Corpus Cancer and Uterine Sarcomas

Appendix C. Patient Information

Recommended: in case of chemotherapy complications, contact your oncologist.

1. If body temperature rises to 38 °C or higher:

  • consult an oncologist.

2. In case of stomatitis:

  • diet with mechanical and thermal sparing of the mucosa;

  • consult an oncologist.

3. In case of diarrhea:

  • diet – exclude fatty, spicy, smoked, sweet, dairy, and high-fiber foods. Lean meats, flour products, fermented dairy products, and rice water are permitted. Drink plenty of fluids.

  • consult an oncologist.

4. In case of nausea:

  • consult an oncologist.

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Appendix G1. WHO/ECOG Performance Status Scale

Russian title: WHO/ECOG performance status scale [82]

Original title: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization Performance Status (ECOG/WHO PS)

Source (official developer website, validation publication): https://ecog-acrin.org/resources/ecog-performance-status

Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP: Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982, 5(6):649-655

Type: rating scale

Purpose: to describe the patient's level of functioning in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activities, and physical abilities (walking, work, etc.).

Contents:

Score

Description

0

Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction

1

Patient is unable to do heavy work, but can carry out light or sedentary work (e.g., light housework or office work)

2

Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours

3

Capable of only limited self-care; confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours

4

Completely disabled; cannot carry on any self-care; totally confined to bed or chair

5

Dead

Key (interpretation): provided within the scale itself

Appendix G2. Karnofsky Performance Scale

Russian title: Karnofsky scale [83]

Original title (if applicable): KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE STATUS

Source (official developer website, validation publication): Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH: The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. edn. Edited by MacLeod C. New York: Columbia University Press; 1949: 191-205

Type: rating scale

Purpose: to describe the patient's level of functioning in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activities, and physical abilities (walking, work, etc.).

Content (template):

Karnofsky Performance Scale

100 – Normal condition, no complaints

90 – Able to carry on normal activity; minor symptoms or signs of disease

80 – Normal activity with effort; some symptoms or signs of disease

70 – Cares for self, but unable to carry on normal activity or to do active work

60 – Requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for most of their personal needs

50 – Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care

40 – Disabled, requires special care and assistance, including medical care

30 – Severely disabled, hospitalization indicated although death not imminent

20 – Severely ill. Hospitalization and active treatment required

10 – Moribund

0 – Death

Key (interpretation): provided within the scale itself

Scales and calculators from this guideline

ECOG / WHO (Performance Status)Scale for assessing the general condition of cancer patientsKarnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)Percentage scale for self-care and work capacity
ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer based on the guideline "Uterine Corpus Cancer and Uterine Sarcomas" and other active Ministry of Health clinical guidelines with a reference to the section, rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines