Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: clinical guidelines

Applies toadults2025 editionA98.5

Clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults. 2025 edition, ICD-10 codes: A98.5. On the page — abridged version by WhiteCoat Pro and the full official text.

Get research articles on hemorrhagic fever with renal syndromeEvery morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in English, with figures, sample size, and conclusion. Plus updates in Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary of the guideline text, 2025 edition. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

HFRS is an acute viral natural-focal disease characterized by microvascular damage, hemorrhagic syndrome, and acute kidney injury. The guideline focuses on early recognition, mandatory hospitalization, stage-based treatment, and convalescent follow-up.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Collect complaints and onset timing: fever, intoxication, myalgia, headache, nausea and pain or heaviness in the lower back, decreased visual acuity. Clarify history of exposure to an endemic focus, contact with rodents or contaminated objects, consumption of untreated foods, and seasonality. → in text
  2. Evaluate skin and mucous membranes: hyperemia of the face, neck, and upper torso, scleral vessel injection, soft palate enanthema, petechiae, ecchymoses, and epistaxis. → in text
  3. Measure temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate, assess Allgower index, skin condition, and urine output volume; specifically monitor lower back pain and decreased diuresis starting from days 4–6 of the disease. → in text
  4. Perform serial complete blood counts with leukocyte formula, platelets, and hematocrit, as well as urinalysis. Level of reliability of evidence C, level of trustworthiness of evidence 4. → in text
  5. Perform a blood chemistry panel including urea, creatinine, total protein, bilirubin, ALT, AST, and alkaline phosphatase, as well as a coagulogram. Level of reliability of evidence C, level of trustworthiness of evidence 5. → in text
  6. Confirm etiology by detecting IgM and IgG antibodies to hantaviruses; if registered test systems are available, perform PCR for hantavirus RNA. Optimally, take the first serum sample before days 4–7 of the disease or on the first day of hospitalization and test paired sera at an interval of 4–7 days. Level of reliability of evidence C, level of trustworthiness of evidence 4. → in text
  7. Perform renal ultrasound in all patients. In severe cases, additionally apply pulse oximetry in case of multiorgan dysfunction or pneumonia, chest radiography for signs of pulmonary involvement, ECG for cardiac auscultatory changes, and upper GI endoscopy for abdominal pain or coffee-ground vomiting. → in text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

When to consider HFRS?

In acute fever and intoxication, especially if accompanied by lower back pain, decreased diuresis, visual impairment, petechiae, or bleeding. Diagnostic suspicion is heightened by thrombocytopenia. → in text

What non-specific tests are performed in suspected HFRS?

Serial complete blood counts with leukocyte formula, platelets, and hematocrit, as well as urinalysis, are performed. → in text

How is the etiology of HFRS confirmed?

Etiology is confirmed by detecting IgM and IgG antibodies to hantaviruses; if registered test systems are available, PCR for hantavirus RNA is performed. Paired sera with an interval of 4–7 days are used for serological diagnosis. → in text

How to manage hypervolemia and AKI in HFRS?

Furosemide is used only in hypervolemia, preferably intravenously; doses exceeding 400 mg/day are unjustified. If diuretics fail and hypervolemia progresses, or if conservative therapy for AKI fails, address the issue of renal replacement therapy or hemodialysis. → in text

How long to follow up a patient after HFRS?

Dispensary follow-up is conducted after discharge at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months. Clinical status, complete blood count, urinalysis, biochemistry, ECG, and renal ultrasound are monitored. → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
347, edition 2 (ID 347_2)
Publication date
August 18, 2025
Age category
adults
ICD-10 codes
A98.5
Specialties
Infectious Diseases
Developers
Academician V.I. Pokrovsky National Association of Infectious Disease Specialists (NAIDS)
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Rubricator — 347_2

Abridged Clinical Guidelines: Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome

The abridged version of this guideline by WhiteCoat Pro is 231 pages long: every section of the document is summarized concisely in plain language, complete with tests and fill-in-the-blanks for self-assessment. Designed for when you need not just to read a guideline, but to master it for an exam, accreditation exam, or clinical practice.
All abbreviated CPGs: 300
Beginning of abbreviated version — open

Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS)

(Synonyms: hemorrhagic nephrosonephritis, Churilov's disease, epidemic nephrosonephritis, Far Eastern, Korean, Manchurian, Tula hemorrhagic fevers, Scandinavian epidemic nephropathy; hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome).

Definition: An acute viral zoonotic natural focal disease.

Key clinical and pathogenetic characteristics:

  • Systemic microvascular lesion.
  • Hemorrhagic diathesis.
  • Hemodynamic disorders.
  • Specific renal involvement (presenting as acute interstitial nephritis with the development of acute kidney injury).

1.2 Etiology and Pathogenesis

Etiology:

  • Family: Bunyaviruses (Bunyaviridae).
  • Genus: Hantavirus.
  • Over 30 serologically and genetically distinct hantaviruses are known.

Clinical forms of hantavirus infection in humans:

  • Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS)
  • Causative agents: Puumala (PUUV), Seoul (SEOV), Amur (AMRV), Hantaan (HTNV), and Dobrava (DOBV) viruses.
  • Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (first described in the USA, 1993)
  • Causative agents: Sin Nombre, Black Creek, New York, Bayou, Andes, and Laguna Negra viruses.

Epidemiology and geography of strains (with a focus on the Russian Federation):

  • Only HFRS is registered in the territory of Russia.
  • 7 types of hantaviruses circulate in the Russian Federation (5 of which are pathogenic).
  • European foci of the Russian Federation: the absolute majority of cases are caused by the Puumala type (circulation of Hantaan, Seoul, and Dobrava is also possible).
  • Russian Far East (as well as South Korea, North Korea, China, Japan): Hantaan, Seoul, and Amur viruses circulate.

Basics of pathogenesis:

  • Hantaviruses are polytrophic.
  • The infection is generalized in nature (various organs and systems are involved).
  • The generalization of the process causes a pronounced polymorphism of symptoms, which manifests regardless of the specific hantavirus serotype.

The virus is capable of infecting:

  • Monocytes and macrophages
  • Endothelial cells
  • Platelets
  • Cells of the lungs, kidneys, liver, etc.

Incubation period

  • Entry gate of infection: epithelium of the respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract (GIT), and damaged skin.
  • Pathogenesis: virus replication occurs in the cells of the macrophage system, which causes the activation of specific and nonspecific defense factors of the body.

Initial (febrile) period

The pathogenetic basis of the period includes:

  • Viremia and intoxication.
  • Activation of the hormonal and immune systems, production of pro-inflammatory cytokines.
  • Massive vasopathy and coagulopathy.
  • Microcirculatory disturbance and tissue destruction.
  • In severe forms: formation of autoantigens followed by the formation of autoantibodies.

Oliguric period (height of the disease)

Characterized by damage to vital body systems:

  • Systemic disorders: ongoing systemic circulatory disorder, hypovolemia, hemoconcentration, organ hypoperfusion and hypoxia, tissue acidosis.
  • Hemostatic system: the hypocoagulation phase of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) syndrome predominates.
  • Organ lesions: edema, hemorrhages, dystrophic, and necrobiotic changes occur in parenchymal organs (pituitary gland, adrenal glands, kidneys, myocardium).

Pathogenesis of renal injury (AKI in HFRS)

The greatest pathological changes occur in the kidneys.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is caused by parenchymal damage—acute interstitial nephritis. It is accompanied by decreased glomerular filtration and impaired tubular reabsorption.

Mechanisms of AKI development:

  • Vascular-exudative factor:
  • Microcirculatory disturbance + increased vascular wall permeability.
  • Plasmorrhea and serous-hemorrhagic edema of the renal interstitium (predominantly in the medullary pyramid region).
  • Compression of tubules and collecting ducts.
  • Dystrophy and desquamation of the tubular epithelium, transudation of protein and fibrin.
  • Obturation of tubules by fibrin clots → impairment of urine back-reabsorption.
The official full text of the guideline below remains open and free. Only the condensed study version as a whole is paid: section-by-section explanations, self-assessment tests, and integration with platform materials.

List of Abbreviations

ALT – alanine aminotransferase

AST – aspartate aminotransferase

aPTT – activated partial thromboplastin time

WHO – World Health Organization

HFRS – hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome

DIC – disseminated intravascular coagulation

D.Sc. in Medicine – Doctor of Medical Sciences

DNA – deoxyribonucleic acid

VLE – List of Vital and Essential Drugs

IMV – invasive mechanical ventilation

TBE – tick-borne encephalitis

EIA – enzyme immunoassay

Ph.D. in Medicine – Candidate of Medical Sciences

CT – computed tomography

Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation – Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

ICD-10 – International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision

INN – International Nonproprietary Name

INR – international normalized ratio

ARF – acute respiratory failure

CHI – compulsory health insurance of citizens

AKI – acute kidney injury

ARDS – acute respiratory distress syndrome

ICU – intensive care unit

PCR – polymerase chain reaction

RB – Republic of Bashkortostan

IIFA – indirect immunofluorescence assay

RF – Russian Federation

SS – septic shock

US – ultrasound examination

FL – Federal Law

HR – heart rate

ECG – electrocardiography

HLA – human leukocyte antigen system

Terms and Definitions

Evidence-based medicine is an approach to medical practice in which decisions regarding the use of preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic interventions are made based on available evidence of their efficacy and safety, with such evidence being sought, compared, synthesized, and widely disseminated for use in the best interest of patients

Disease is a disturbance of the body's activity, working capacity, and ability to adapt to changing environmental and internal conditions, arising from the impact of pathogenic factors, accompanied by alterations in the body's protective-compensatory and protective-adaptive reactions and mechanisms.

Primary disease is a disease that, by itself or due to complications, necessitates primary medical care due to the greatest threat to working capacity, life, and health, or leads to disability, or becomes the cause of death;

Concomitant disease is a disease that has no causal relationship with the primary disease, is inferior to it in terms of the need for medical care, impact on working capacity, danger to life and health, and is not the cause of death;

Severity of a disease or condition is a criterion determining the degree of damage to organs and (or) systems of the human body or impairment of their functions caused by the disease, condition, or their complications;

Disease outcomes are the medical and biological consequences of a disease;

Consequences (results) are disease outcomes, as well as the social and economic results of applying medical technologies;

Disease complication is the addition to a disease of a syndrome of physiological process impairment; - impairment of the integrity of an organ or its wall; - bleeding; - developed acute or chronic insufficiency of an organ or organ system function;

Instrumental diagnostics – diagnostics using various devices, apparatuses, and instruments to examine a patient.

Quality of medical care – a set of characteristics reflecting the timeliness of medical care, the correctness of the choice of prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation methods in the provision of medical care, and the degree of achievement of the planned result.

Clinical guidelines are a document based on proven clinical experience, describing the physician's actions regarding the diagnosis, treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention of diseases, helping them make correct clinical decisions.

Laboratory diagnostics – a set of methods aimed at analyzing test material using various specialized equipment.

Patient model is a set of clinical, laboratory, and instrumental diagnostic signs that allow identifying a disease (poisoning, trauma, physiological state) and classifying it into a group of conditions with a common etiology and pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and common approaches to treatment and condition correction;

Medical professional is an individual who has a medical or other education, works in a medical organization and whose labor (job) duties include the implementation of medical activities, or an individual who is a sole proprietor directly engaged in them.

Nosological form is a set of clinical, laboratory, and instrumental diagnostic signs that allow identifying a disease (poisoning, trauma, physiological state) and classifying it into a group of conditions with a common etiology, pathogenesis, and clinical manifestations.

Syndrome is a condition developing as a consequence of a disease and defined by a set of clinical, laboratory, and instrumental diagnostic signs that allow identifying it and classifying it into a group of conditions with different etiologies but a common pathogenesis and clinical presentation

Level of certainty of evidence – reflects the degree of confidence that the found effect of a medical intervention is true.

Level of recommendation certainty – reflects not only the degree of confidence in the validity of the intervention's effect, but also the degree of confidence that following the recommendations will bring more benefit than harm in a specific situation.

Drug formularies – a section of patient treatment protocols containing information on medications, regimens, and specific features of their prescription used for a particular disease (syndrome).

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) (synonyms: hemorrhagic nephrosonephritis, Churilov's disease, epidemic nephrosonephritis, Far Eastern hemorrhagic fever, Korean hemorrhagic fever, Manchurian hemorrhagic fever, Scandinavian epidemic nephropathy, Tula fever; hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome) is an acute viral zoonotic natural focal disease characterized by systemic microvascular damage, hemorrhagic diathesis, hemodynamic disorders, and specific renal damage of the acute interstitial nephritis type with the development of acute kidney injury [1, 4, 5, 12, 18, 34, 40, 78, 79, 81].

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

The causative agent of HFRS belongs to the Bunyaviridae family, Hantavirus genus. To date, more than 30 serologically and genetically distinct hantaviruses are known. Two clinical forms of hantavirus infection in humans have been described:

- hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, caused by Puumala (PUUV), Seoul (SEOV), Amur (AMRV), Hantaan (HTNV), and Dobrava (DOBV) viruses [9, 35, 69];

- hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, first described in the USA in 1993, caused by Sin-Nombre, Black Creek, New York, Bayou, Andes, and Laguna Negra hantaviruses [9, 35, 67, 69].

Only the first clinical form of the disease (hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome) is registered in Russia, with the circulation of 7 hantavirus types established, including 5 pathogenic ones. In European foci, the overwhelming majority of cases are caused by the Puumala type [4, 5, 6, 10, 25, 44]. The possibility of circulation of Hantaan, Seoul, and Dobrava has also been demonstrated. Hantaan, Seoul, and Amur viruses circulate in natural foci of the Russian Far East, South Korea, North Korea, China, and Japan [35, 51, 54, 61, 71].

The generalized nature of the infection involving various organs and systems in the pathological process determines the polymorphism of symptoms regardless of the hantavirus serotype [3, 11, 22, 37, 39, 56, 78, 79, 81]. Hantaviruses are polytropic; they are capable of infecting monocytes, macrophages, endothelial cells, platelets, and cells of the lungs, kidneys, liver, etc.

During the incubation period, the HFRS virus enters the body through the epithelium of the respiratory tract, gastrointestinal tract, and damaged skin. Subsequently, it reproduces in the cells of the macrophage system, activating specific and nonspecific defense factors.

The pathogenetic basis of the initial (febrile) period of HFRS includes viremia, intoxication, activation of the hormonal and immune systems, production of proinflammatory cytokines, massive vasopathy, coagulopathy, microcirculatory disorders, tissue destruction, and the formation of autoantigens with the generation of autoantibodies (in severe HFRS) [3, 8, 11, 14, 22, 28, 37, 41, 56, 57].

In the oliguric period of HFRS (peak of the disease), systemic circulatory disorders, hypovolemia, hemoconcentration, organ hypoperfusion and hypoxia, tissue acidosis, and damage to vital body systems continue. The hypocoagulation phase of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) predominates. Edema, hemorrhages, dystrophic, and necrobiotic changes occur in the pituitary gland, adrenal glands, kidneys, myocardium, and other parenchymal organs.

The greatest changes are observed in the kidneys, accompanied by a decrease in glomerular filtration and impaired tubular reabsorption [4, 6, 22, 36, 57, 64]. Acute kidney injury (AKI) in HFRS is caused by damage to the renal parenchyma and acute interstitial nephritis. On the one hand, microcirculatory disorders and increased vascular wall permeability contribute to plasmorrhea and serous-hemorrhagic edema of the renal interstitium, mainly in the pyramids, followed by compression of the tubules and collecting ducts, leading to dystrophy, desquamation of the tubular epithelium, leakage of protein and fibrin with obstruction of the tubules and collecting ducts by fibrin plugs, and impaired urine reabsorption. On the other hand, an immunopathological factor—the fixation of immune complexes on the glomerular basement membrane—reduces glomerular filtration. Interstitial edema exacerbates renal microcirculatory disorders, up to ischemia and, in some cases, renal tubular necrosis, contributing to a further decrease in glomerular filtration and tubular reabsorption. Tubular cells are particularly sensitive to hypoxia and the lack of energy substrates arising during ischemia. Autoantibodies to damaged tissue structures may also participate in the pathological process. Central hemodynamic disorders (hypovolemia, decreased cardiac output, arterial hypotension) exacerbate renal blood flow disorders [1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 14, 29, 36, 70].

The polyuric period begins between the 9th and 13th days and lasts until the 21st–24th day of the disease. As a result of the development of specific immunity, elimination of the pathogen, and clearance of immune complexes, pathological changes in the kidneys and other organs regress, and trends toward the normalization of their functions are observed. In the polyuria stage, glomerular filtration is the first to increase. Under conditions of a damaged tubular apparatus, even a slight increase in filtration contributes to increased diuresis. Polyuria is caused by osmotic diuresis. Slow restoration of the tubular reabsorption function leads to the loss of potassium, sodium, and chlorine [4, 14, 37, 60, 67, 69].

The recovery period is pathogenetically characterized by the formation of stable post-infection immunity with a high level of specific IgG, restoration of hemostasis, microcirculation, and glomerular filtration, but with prolonged persistence of tubular disorders (tubular insufficiency) [3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 31, 37, 42, 60].

The correspondence of clinical syndromes to pathogenetic mechanisms and morphological substrate [3, 11, 37, 56, 57] is presented in Appendix A3.

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

HFRS is a strictly natural-focal zoonosis. The main reservoir of the pathogen in nature consists of wild murine rodents.

In the European part of Russia, the source of infection is the bank vole (infection rates in rodents in endemic foci reach 40–57%). In the Far East, the main reservoirs of infection are the striped field vole, the grey-red vole, and the Korean field vole. Rodents carry this infection in the form of latent virus carriage. In field mice trapped in natural foci, the viral antigen has been detected in the tissues of the lungs, kidneys, liver, lymph nodes, spleen, and rectum. The pathogen is excreted into the external environment with feces, urine, and saliva. Transmission between rodents occurs mainly via the respiratory tract.

Literature data indicate that the role of other mammals (about 40 species) and birds (about 13 species) in maintaining the hantavirus infection epizootic in the wild cannot be excluded [3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 25, 30, 35, 38, 44, 69, 78, 79, 81].

Human infection occurs predominantly via the airborne dust route (up to 80%), by inhaling dried excreta of infected rodents. Virus transmission is also possible by contact, through damaged skin and mucous membranes upon contact with rodents or infected environmental objects (brushwood, straw, hay, etc.). Alimentarily acquired infection is also considered possible, for example, through consumption of heat-untreated foods (cabbage, carrots, etc.) contaminated by infected rodents. Human-to-human transmission does not occur.

Susceptibility is universal. Males fall ill more frequently (70–90% of patients) of the most active age group (from 16 to 50 years), predominantly industrial workers, drivers, tractor operators, and agricultural workers. The incidence is recorded less frequently in children (3–5%), women, and elderly individuals due to less contact with the natural environment and, likely, immunogenetic features. Urban residents predominate among the sick (up to 70–80%), which is associated with both their larger population size and the level of immune layers.

HFRS incidence is characterized by a pronounced summer-autumn seasonality, which is due to increased human contact with the wild (dacha activities, hiking trips, recreation, harvesting berries and mushrooms). There is a direct correlation between human incidence and rodent population numbers and their infection rates in a given territory [9, 10, 25, 35, 38, 44, 69].

HFRS is distributed worldwide. It is registered in Scandinavian countries (Sweden, Norway, Finland), Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Belgium, France, the Far East (PRC, DPRK, South Korea), and Russia [24, 30, 35, 51, 54, 61, 71]. About 97% of the total annually registered cases of HFRS occur in the European part of Russia and 3% in the Asian part. The most active foci of the disease are the regions between the Volga and the Urals (Bashkiria, Udmurtia, Tatarstan, Samara and Ulyanovsk Oblasts), and the Far East of the Russian Federation (Primorsky and Khabarovsk Krais, Jewish Autonomous and Amur Oblasts).

The past infection leaves lasting life-long type-specific immunity. Isolated cases of reinfection are known.

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

A98.5 – Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome.

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

[4, 5, 7, 18, 34, 39].

  • By clinical course:

    1. Typical (manifest);

    2. Atypical (asymptomatic, mild/subclinical).

  • By severity (Appendix A3):

    1. Mild;

    2. Moderate;

    3. Severe;

    4. Extremely severe (complicated) degree of severity

  • By the nature of the course:

    1. Uncomplicated;

    2. Complicated;

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

[3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 16, 20, 21, 28, 31, 39, 41, 53, 56, 57, 60, 65].

The incubation period of HFRS ranges from 1 to 5 weeks, averaging 2–3 weeks. The disease proceeds cyclically; the following periods of the disease are distinguished: febrile (initial, general toxic), lasting on average from 3 to 7 days; oliguric (on average 6–12 days); polyuric (on average 6–14 days); and convalescence period (early – up to 2 months and late – up to 2–3 years).

The clinical picture of the disease features the following main syndromes:

1) asthenovegetative (weakness, malaise, reduced performance, etc.);

2) intoxication (myalgia, high fever, eye pain, headache, decreased appetite, etc.);

3) hemodynamic (central and microcirculatory disorders);

4) renal (lower back pain, oligoanuria, polyuria, etc.);

5) hemorrhagic (petechial rash, scleral hemorrhages, epistaxis, gastrointestinal bleeding, etc.);

6) visual disturbances (decreased vision, appearance of "fog, net" before the eyes);

7) abdominal (vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea);

8) respiratory syndrome (nasal congestion, dry cough, sore throat);

9) neuroendocrine.

Various combinations of these syndromes characterize each of the four periods of the disease. Symptoms of dysfunction of various organs involved in the infectious process are observed throughout all periods of the disease.

In the majority of patients, HFRS begins acutely. Chills, headache, muscle and joint pain, dry mouth, thirst, sometimes mild cough, and pronounced general weakness appear. In a small fraction of patients, the appearance of pronounced signs of the disease is preceded by a prodromal period: general malaise, rapid fatigability, low-grade fever.

Fever in most patients reaches high values on the very first day of the illness, lasting from 5–6 to 10–11 days, averaging 6–7 days. The temperature curve has no specific pattern; in most cases, it decreases lytically over two to three days.

Physical examination reveals pronounced hyperemia of the skin of the face, neck, and upper torso. Particularly noticeable are the injection of scleral and conjunctival vessels, hyperemia of the oropharyngeal mucosa, and the appearance of a spotted enanthema on the soft palate. The development of hemorrhagic syndrome is possible in the form of petechial rash on the inner surfaces of both shoulders, lateral surfaces of the torso, on the chest ("whip, lash" symptom), ecchymoses at injection sites, and brief nosebleeds. Positive endothelial symptoms (cuff, pinch, tourniquet tests) are determined. Blood pressure is normal or shows a tendency toward hypotension; relative bradycardia is characteristic. Some patients note a feeling of heaviness in the lower back.

At the end of the initial period, the frequency of urination decreases along with a slight reduction in diuresis. Laboratory shifts are characterized by a slight increase in serum creatinine and urea levels, a decrease in the relative density of urine, and the appearance of isolated fresh red blood cells and proteinuria in the sediment. Blood tests in most patients are characterized by moderate leukopenia and, less frequently, mild leukocytosis and a left shift of band neutrophils, along with signs of hemoconcentration against the background of plasma leakage and hypovolemia in the form of elevated red blood cell and hemoglobin counts. A pathognomonic symptom of HFRS in the early period is thrombocytopenia caused by the damaging effect of the virus, the development of immunopathological reactions, increased platelet adhesive properties, and the formation of cellular aggregates with their retention in microvessels, leading to impaired blood rheological properties [1, 4, 5, 7, 14, 16, 21, 23, 28].

The oliguric period is the most vivid stage, during which the clinical picture inherent to HFRS unfolds. The drop in temperature is not accompanied by an improvement in the patient's condition; as a rule, it worsens. General toxic phenomena reach their maximum, and signs of hemodynamic disorders, renal damage, and hemorrhagic diathesis intensify. The most constant sign of transition into the oliguric period is the onset of lower back pain of varying intensity: from discomfort and heaviness to sharp, agonizing pain, nausea, vomiting unrelated to food intake or medication, and, in severe cases, hiccups. Asthenia and adynamia increase. The face is hyperemic; as acute kidney injury and disseminated intravascular coagulation progress, the flush is replaced by pallor, hemorrhagic manifestations intensify—mainly in severe disease courses: scleral hemorrhages, ecchymoses, epistaxis, gross hematuria, hematomas at injection sites, and less commonly, intestinal bleeding, blood in vomitus, and hemoptysis. Of critical importance in diagnosis is identifying visual impairments (decreased visual acuity, "floaters", sensation of fog before the eyes) caused by microcirculation disorders in the retina, which appear on days 2–7 of the illness and last for 2–4 days [1, 4, 5, 7, 14, 16, 21, 23, 28].

In most patients, blood pressure is within the normal range at the beginning of the oliguric period, whereas arterial hypotension develops in severe cases. In the second half of this period, blood pressure (BP) increases in 1/3 of patients; the duration of hypertension rarely exceeds 5 days. Absolute or relative bradycardia is characteristic. Harsh vesicular breathing, isolated dry rales, and occasionally moist rales can be auscultated over the lungs. Pulmonary changes ("congestive lungs" manifested by plethora and perivascular infiltration, decreased aeration, focal pneumonia, pleural effusion, and alveolar edema), similar to hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, are observed in severe and complicated forms of HFRS [3, 4, 5, 27, 28].

On days 2-5 of the disease, diarrhea occurs in 10-15% of patients. The tongue is dry, coated with gray or brown fur. The abdomen is moderately distended; tenderness on palpation is noted in the epigastric and umbilical regions, particularly in the renal projections and sometimes of a diffuse nature. Signs of peritonism may be present. The liver is enlarged and tender in 20-25% of patients. In severe cases, an "acute abdomen" symptom complex may develop, caused by extensive hemorrhages into the mucosa of the stomach, intestines, and peritoneum (the so-called abdominal form) [1, 4, 5, 20, 39, 58].

Renal syndrome is among the leading manifestations. Pasternatsky's sign is positive or markedly positive. The full-blown picture of AKI is characterized by progressive oligoanuria, escalating uremic intoxication, water-electrolyte balance disorders, and progressive metabolic acidosis [3, 4, 5, 14, 37, 42].

Central nervous system disorders are observed in virtually all patients, both as manifestations of general cerebral symptoms associated with intoxication and as a consequence of focal lesions. Meningism symptoms, encephalitic reactions with the appearance of meningeal signs (nuchal rigidity, Kernig's and Brudzinski's signs), focal neurological deficits (corresponding to the areas of brain damage), as well as psychiatric disorders (ranging from sleep disturbances to various disorders of consciousness) may develop [1, 4, 13, 17, 32, 63].

The hemogram consistently reveals neutrophilic leukocytosis (up to 15-30×109/L of blood), plasmacytosis, and thrombocytopenia [1, 4, 7, 17, 21, 34, 39, 53, 56, 57, 60, 65]. In severe cases, the blood picture is characterized by a leukemoid reaction. Due to hemoconcentration, hemoglobin and erythrocyte levels may increase, but these parameters decrease in the event of bleeding, and the ESR gradually accelerates. Elevated residual nitrogen, urea, and creatinine levels are characteristic, as well as hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hyponatremia, and signs of metabolic acidosis. General urinalysis reveals massive proteinuria (up to 33-66 g/L), the intensity of which fluctuates during the day ("protein shot"), hematuria, cylindruria, and the appearance of renal epithelial cells (so-called Dunaevsky cells). Hyposthenuria develops from the second half of the oliguric period.

Significant changes occur in the blood coagulation system. While hypercoagulation persists in a portion of patients, hypocoagulation develops in severe courses of the disease. It is caused by the consumption of plasma clotting factors due to microthrombus formation in small vessels. It is precisely during the oliguric period of HFRS that hemorrhagic manifestations reach their peak and frequently become the cause of death.

The polyuric period begins on days 9-13 and lasts until days 21-24 of the disease. Vomiting ceases, back and abdominal pain gradually disappear, sleep and appetite normalize, daily urine output increases (up to 3-10 L), and nocturia is characteristic. Against the background of hypokalemia, weakness, muscular hypotonia, intestinal paresis, bladder atonia, tachycardia, and arrhythmia persist; dry mouth and thirst appear. The duration of polyuria and isohyposthenuria, depending on the severity of the clinical course, can range from several days to several weeks.

Laboratory shifts during this period consist of a slight decrease in red blood cells and hemoglobin, and an increase in platelet count. The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is somewhat accelerated. Serum urea and creatinine levels gradually decrease, and hypokalemia frequently develops. A low relative urine density, not exceeding 1001-1005, is characteristic. The urine sediment contains a small amount of protein, moderate hematuria and cylindruria, occasionally leukocyturia, and a small number of renal epithelial cells.

During the convalescence period, a marked improvement in general condition occurs, along with the restoration of daily diuresis and the normalization of urea and creatinine levels. Convalescents exhibit asthenovegetative syndrome: general weakness, rapid fatigue, decreased work capacity, emotional lability, shortness of breath upon minor physical exertion, finger tremor, hyperhidrosis, and insomnia. During this period, a feeling of heaviness in the lower back, a positive Pasternatsky's sign, nocturia, and persistent isohyposthenuria (lasting up to 1 year or more) may be noted. A secondary bacterial infection may supervene with the development of pyelonephritis, most commonly observed in patients who have undergone AKI.

A comprehensive assessment of the severity of toxemia, hemorrhagic, and renal syndromes reflects the severity and prognosis of the infection Appendix A3. [1, 4, 5, 7, 14, 17, 20, 29, 34, 39, 86].

Prognostic criteria for severity (on days 2-4 of the disease) [1, 7, 17, 20, 21, 39, 42, 43, 46, 53, 57, 87]:

  • Persistent hypotension, dizziness, collapse-like reactions;

  • Pronounced hemorrhagic syndrome;

  • Repeated vomiting unrelated to food intake; persistent hiccups;

  • Sharp decrease in visual acuity;

  • Severe pain in the lower back and abdomen, oliguria, massive proteinuria;

  • Signs of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): shortness of breath, cough, bouts of air hunger, asphyxia;

  • Early leukocytosis >10.0×109/L, significant increase in blood urea and creatinine levels in the first days of the disease, pronounced proteinuria, erythrocyturia.

  • Increased concentration of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the patient's blood upon admission (concentration is determined by immunoturbidimetric assay at a wavelength of 340 nm). The severity of the disease course is predicted based on the CRP level within the following ranges: 10-21 mg/L – moderate HFRS course, 22-27 mg/L – severe HFRS course, 28 g/L and above – severe HFRS course complicated by acute renal failure.

Severe forms of HFRS from the first days of the disease demonstrate the full symptom complex of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in the form of various combinations of hemodynamic disorders with dysfunctions of the kidneys, liver, heart, lungs, and nervous system.

Complications of HFRS are divided into two groups:

a) specific – septic (infectious-toxic) shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) syndrome, acute kidney injury (AKI), azotemic uremia, pulmonary edema, cerebral edema, hemorrhages in the brain, pituitary gland, adrenal glands, myocardium, profuse bleeding, eclampsia, acute cardiovascular disease, infectious myocarditis, rupture or tear of the renal capsule;

b) nonspecific – pyelonephritis, pneumonia, purulent otitis media, abscesses, phlegmons, parotitis, sepsis, etc.

A peculiar pathomorphological triad of fatal HFRS cases is characteristic: hemorrhagic necroses in the kidneys (medullary zone) and in the heart (right atrium), and pulmonary edema. In addition, gelatinous edema of the perirenal adipose tissue is frequently noted. In some deceased patients, foci of necrosis in the anterior lobe of the pituitary gland were discovered, which were the direct cause of death [1, 4, 13, 32].

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

Diagnostic criteria

Diagnosis of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in adults is made on the basis of epidemiological and clinical history, clinical examination, laboratory and special examination methods, and is aimed at determining the nosology and clinical form, the severity of the condition, and identifying complications and indications for therapy.

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

It is recommended to pay attention to the presence and timing of the onset of fever, intoxication (weakness, malaise, decreased appetite, nausea, repeated vomiting), complaints of muscle aches, headaches, heaviness and pain in the lower back, and decreased visual acuity in all patients with suspected HFRS to determine the severity and duration of the disease [1, 4, 5, 18, 21, 23, 26, 39]

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended that all patients with suspected hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) be evaluated for epidemiological history data regarding a potential stay in an HFRS endemic focus during the incubation period, history of contact of damaged skin or mucous membranes with contaminated environmental objects (brushwood, straw, hay), and consumption of thermally unprocessed foods (cabbage, carrots) contaminated by infected rodents; the degree of contact should be assessed to determine the likelihood of infection taking into account the mechanism and route of transmission [1, 4, 5, 9, 10, 23, 24, 25, 30, 35, 38, 79, 81].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended to pay attention to seasonal increases in HFRS incidence in the given region for the clinical diagnosis of the disease [1, 4, 5, 9, 10, 25, 35, 38, 81].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended to assess concomitant chronic conditions or other states (pregnancy) in all patients with suspected HFRS to identify risk factors for a severe and complicated course of the disease [4, 5, 7, 18, 20, 37].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

2.2 Physical Examination

It is recommended that the examination of all patients with suspected HFRS begin with a general physical assessment of the skin and visible mucous membranes: color (hyperemia of the skin of the face, neck, upper torso, and oropharyngeal mucosa), injection of scleral and conjunctival vessels. Attention should be paid to the presence of a spotted enanthema on the soft palate, petechial rash on the inner surfaces of both shoulders, lateral surfaces of the torso, and chest ("whip" or "lash" sign), ecchymoses at injection sites, and epistaxis to diagnose the severity and character of the disease course [1, 4, 5, 18, 20, 34, 39, 57, 80].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended that all patients with suspected HFRS undergo an assessment of vital signs — respiratory rate (RR), blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), their ratio (Allgöver index), skin condition (pallor, acrocyanosis), urine output volume (oliguria, oligoanuria), and temperature measurement to determine the severity of the disease, presence of complications, and comorbid conditions [1, 4, 5, 14, 18, 20, 34, 39, 57, 80, 81].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended that all patients with suspected HFRS pay attention to the severity of lower back pain and decreased urine output starting from days 4–6 of the disease to assess the severity of the condition and for clinical diagnosis [4, 5, 14, 18, 20, 39, 57, 80, 81].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended that all patients with suspected HFRS be evaluated for the cyclic nature of the clinical course and the main symptoms of a specific period of the disease in order to assess condition severity, development of complications, and clinical diagnosis of HFRS [4, 5, 14, 18, 20, 34, 39, 57, 95].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Transfer to an intensive care unit (ICU) is recommended for patients with severe HFRS and the development of septic shock and other emergency conditions to provide intensive care [12, 14, 31, 74, 76].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

2.3.1. Nonspecific laboratory diagnostics

It is recommended to perform a complete blood count (CBC) with assessment of erythrocyte, leukocyte, and platelet counts, hematocrit evaluation, and differential leukocyte count dynamically in all patients with suspected HFRS for diagnosis, comprehensive assessment of disease severity, and timely detection of complications and emergencies [1, 3, 4, 5, 18, 31, 34, 39, 60, 65, 83, 86].

Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).

Comments: in an uncomplicated course of HFRS during the febrile period, normocytosis or leukopenia, neutropenia, relative lympho- and monocytosis, and elevated erythrocyte and hemoglobin levels due to plasma leakage and hemoconcentration are characteristic; during the oliguric period, leukocytosis with a left shift increases, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) rises. From the early period of HFRS, progressive thrombocytopenia, caused by increased platelet adhesiveness and the formation of cellular aggregates with their retention in microcirculatory vessels, is characteristic.

It is recommended to perform a urinalysis dynamically against the background of the cyclic disease course in all patients with suspected HFRS to detect renal dysfunction as well as a possible concurrent bacterial urinary tract infection [1, 4, 5, 18, 31, 34, 39, 60].

Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).

Comments: during the febrile period, there is an increase in urine specific gravity, moderate proteinuria, and the appearance of isolated fresh erythrocytes in the sediment; the oliguric period is characterized by massive proteinuria with rapid positive dynamics, micro- and macrohematuria, cylindruria, and the appearance of degenerated renal epithelium (Dunaevsky cells) in the urine sediment. With the onset of polyuria against the background of slower regeneration of tubular epithelium and their reabsorption function, hyposthenuria and nocturia develop regardless of the severity of the disease.

2.3.2. Specific laboratory diagnostics

Laboratory testing to identify the HFRS pathogen is mandatory upon hospitalization of a patient with an acute febrile illness accompanied by renal involvement (development of acute kidney injury) and hemorrhagic syndrome.

It is recommended for patients with suspected HFRS, to confirm the etiological factor of the disease as a diagnostic criterion, to perform [4, 6, 8, 57, 64, 72, 77, 80]:

- determination of class M antibodies (IgM) to hantaviruses, the causative agents of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, in the blood;

- determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to hantaviruses, the causative agents of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, in the blood.

- determination of hantavirus RNA — the causative agents of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome — in the blood by PCR (if registered test systems are available)

GPP CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4).

Comments: Serological diagnostic methods (IFA, ELISA) are used to confirm the diagnosis of HFRS, including mild and subclinical forms of the disease, with an informative value of 96–98%. Seronegative forms of the disease are registered in 2–4% of cases. The optimal time for collecting clinical material is an early collection of the first serum sample — before days 4–7 of the disease or on the first day of hospitalization. When serum is collected after the 15th day of the disease, an increase in antibody titer may not be detected. ELISA and IFA are performed using paired sera at intervals of 4–7 days. The following is considered diagnostic:

- detection using serological tests of total antibodies (IgM and IgG) to HFRS pathogens in blood serum and urine, or detection of a 4-fold or greater increase in antibody titer in paired blood sera; after recovering from the disease, specific antibodies at a low titer of 1:64–1:128 persist almost for life, regardless of the severity of the past disease;

- detection of IgM to HFRS pathogens in blood serum during the acute period of the disease in conjunction with the detection of IgG in paired serum;

- detection of a 4-fold or greater increase in IgG titers to HFRS pathogens in paired sera, or seroconversion;

IgM to the HFRS pathogen are detected in the patient's serum from the 6th to the 56th days of the disease, IgG begin to be detected from the 6th day, reach high levels by the 11th day, and persist at these values for up to 5 months from disease onset and at anamnestic titers for life.

- detection of a specific hantavirus RNA fragment of HFRS pathogens in the samples studied;

- isolation of hantaviruses — the causative agents of HFRS [SanPiN 3.3686-21].

2.3.3. Special laboratory diagnostics

It is recommended to perform a general routine biochemical blood test (investigation of urea, creatinine, total protein, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase [ALT], aspartate aminotransferase [AST], and alkaline phosphatase levels) in patients with HFRS of varying severity to detect organ dysfunction and the development of complications [1, 3, 4, 5, 12, 20, 21, 34, 39, 57, 64, 65, 93].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: In the diagnosis of HFRS, the dynamics of changes in general clinical and biochemical parameters across periods of the disease are significant; they also serve as criteria for severity, development of complications, and prognosis.

Biochemical blood parameters change depending on the period of the disease. At the end of the initial period, laboratory shifts are characterized by a slight increase in serum creatinine and urea levels, moderate hyperenzymenemia (ALT, AST), and azotemia parameters reach their peak during the oliguric period. In the polyuric period, there is a slow recovery of tubular reabsorptive function.

It is recommended to perform a coagulogram (exploratory hemostasis screening) in patients with HFRS of varying severity for a comprehensive assessment of disease severity, diagnosis of complications, and correction of the hemostatic state [1, 3, 4, 5, 12, 22, 28, 39, 56, 70, 83, 86].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: The release of blood and tissue thromboplastin in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) triggers disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which is accompanied by phase changes in the blood coagulation system. As a rule, the initial period of the disease is dominated by the hypercoagulation phase (shortening of thrombin time to 10-15 s, blood clotting time, fibrinogen concentration to 4.5-8 g/L, prothrombin index to 100-120% [12, 39]); with the onset of oliguria, especially in severe disease, hypocoagulation develops (prolongation of thrombin time to 25-50 s, prolongation of clotting time, decrease in fibrinogen concentration to 1-2 g/L, prothrombin index to 30-60% [12, 39]), which is caused by the pathological consumption of plasma clotting factors due to microthrombus formation in small vessels. In the oliguric period of HFRS, hemorrhagic manifestations reach a maximum and often become the cause of death [1, 3, 12, 39]. By the end of the polyuric period, the blood coagulation system normalizes.

It is recommended to determine the levels of C-reactive protein in blood serum and D-dimer in the blood in patients with severe HFRS to assess the severity of HFRS, the development of multiple organ dysfunction, the prognosis of the disease, and to prescribe anti-inflammatory therapy [1, 2, 7, 16, 21, 36, 53, 70, 86, 87, 93].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: The synthesis of acute-phase proteins (CRP), increased coagulation processes (D-dimer), and increased vascular permeability are aimed at forming a full-fledged immune response to the HFRS virus. High concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines may play a certain role in the development of severe forms of HFRS by contributing to increased vascular permeability, enhanced coagulation, and activation of cytotoxic lymphocytes and natural killer cells, leading to damage to microcirculatory vessels, the renal parenchyma, lungs, and other organs.

It is recommended to study the acid-base balance and blood gases in patients with severe HFRS to assess the severity of HFRS, the development of multiple organ dysfunction, the prognosis of the disease, and to prescribe corrective therapy [7, 12, 16, 21, 36, 53, 70].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended to determine blood levels of sodium, potassium, osmolarity (osmolality), and hydrogen ions (pH) in patients with severe HFRS to assess the severity of HFRS, the development of multiple organ dysfunction, the prognosis of the disease, and to prescribe corrective therapy [7, 12, 16, 21, 36, 53, 70, 93].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

It is recommended to perform an ultrasound examination of the kidneys in all HFRS patients for additional confirmation of the diagnosis and early detection of structural disorders in renal tissue and the urinary tract [3, 4, 5, 14, 34, 37, 40, 42, 81, 93].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: microcirculatory disorders and increased vascular wall permeability in the renal glomerular apparatus promote plasma leakage and serous-hemorrhagic edema of the renal interstitium, mainly in the pyramids, followed by compression of the tubules and collecting ducts (akin to "renal glaucoma"), leading to dystrophy and desquamation of the tubular epithelium, leakage of protein and fibrin resulting in tubular and collecting duct obstruction by fibrin clots and impaired reverse urine reabsorption. Ultrasound examination of the kidneys reveals enlarged kidneys, increased cortical echogenicity, and edema of the renal parenchyma ("prominent pyramids sign").

It is recommended to perform targeted chest radiography in patients with severe HFRS when physical signs of pulmonary tissue involvement are detected for differential diagnosis with pneumonia [2, 3, 12, 22, 28, 31, 34].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: pulmonary changes ("congestive lungs" in the form of plethora and perivascular infiltration, decreased pneumatization, focal pneumonia, pleural effusion, alveolar edema, bacterial pneumonia) are observed in severe and complicated forms of HFRS, typically during the oliguric period of the disease.

It is recommended to perform pulse oximetry with measurement of SpO2 in all patients with severe HFRS with the development of multiple organ dysfunction or pneumonia at all stages of medical care for the early detection of respiratory disorders [2, 3, 27].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: pulse oximetry is a simple and reliable screening method that allows for the identification of patients with hypoxemia who require respiratory support and for evaluating its effectiveness.

It is recommended to record an electrocardiogram in standard leads, and echocardiography if necessary, in HFRS patients with auscultatory heart changes to clarify conduction system and myocardial trophic disorders [4, 5, 12, 22, 28, 39, 82, 85, 93].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: against the background of microcirculatory disorders, hypoxia, arterial hypertension, and hypokalemia, dystrophic changes in the myocardium and cardiac conduction system develop, which must be diagnosed in a timely manner and managed with corrective therapy in conjunction with a cardiologist. Echocardiographic changes have been identified in convalescents of severe HFRS, requiring further study to assess their prognostic significance.

It is recommended to perform esophagogastroduodenoscopy in patients with abdominal pain and/or "coffee ground" vomiting to determine the nature of damage to the mucosa of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum [4, 12, 39, 58].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: abdominal pain appears in the oliguric period of the disease and is caused by erosions and hemorrhages in the mucosa of the stomach, distal esophagus, and intestines resulting from mucosal ischemia, microvessel thrombosis, vessel rupture, and hemorrhages against the background of developing disseminated intravascular coagulation.

2.5 Other Procedures

It is recommended to consult related specialists for HFRS patients in cases of suspected complications: a neurologist (in case of cerebral edema or cerebral hemorrhage), a cardiologist (if symptoms of arterial hypertension or acute cardiovascular failure develop), an obstetrician-gynecologist (if HFRS develops during pregnancy) to determine further management tactics [4, 5, 12, 18, 23, 63, 96, 97, 98].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended to obtain an examination (consultation) by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist for patients with stage 1-3 septic shock, rapidly progressive acute respiratory failure (respiratory rate >25 breaths/min, SpO2 <92%), renal and other organ failure (2 or more points on the SOFA scale) for transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) [1, 4, 5, 12, 14, 17, 19, 20, 74, 76].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended to obtain an examination (consultation) by a surgeon for patients with severe HFRS in the presence of intense abdominal pain, hypotension, or hemorrhagic syndrome to determine further management tactics [1, 4, 5, 12, 58].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: Abdominal pain of varying intensity appears in the oliguric period of HFRS, most commonly in severe cases, and is caused by deep focal dystrophy of the gastric and duodenal mucosa, microthrombus formation and stasis in their vessels, multiple hemorrhages, hemorrhagic impregnation of organs, and the formation of acute erosions and ulcers that serve as a source of recurrent bleeding associated with high mortality. The rest of the intestine is also severely affected and can become a source of bleeding and intoxication due to paresis, shedding of villi, and massive autolysis.

2.5.1. Differential diagnosis [1, 4, 5, 17, 27, 31, 36, 88].

Differential diagnosis of HFRS is carried out with infectious diseases characterized by an acute onset and the development of fever-intoxication syndrome, cyclical disease progression, and seasonal incidence. Differential diagnosis of HFRS with other febrile infectious diseases, inflammatory urinary tract diseases, and acute surgical abdominal pathology is presented in Appendix A3.

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

Principles of treatment for HFRS patients involve addressing several tasks:

  • preventing the further progression of the pathological process caused by the disease, achieving a complete and stable recovery;

  • preventing the development of potential complications of the disease.

The choice of treatment tactics is influenced by the following factors:

  • period of the disease;

  • severity of the disease;

  • leading clinical manifestations and features of the disease course, taking into account signs of immunodeficiency (chronic alcoholism, cachexia, severe comorbidities, old age);

  • age of the patient;

  • presence and nature of complications;

  • availability and feasibility of treatment in accordance with the required type of medical care.

Principles of management of HFRS patients:

  • Early hospitalization – by days 3-4 of the disease for patients with manifest manifestations of HFRS of varying severity.

  • Gentle transportation for HFRS patients with moderate and severe disease.

  • Strict bed rest until the end of the polyuric period for HFRS patients with moderate and severe disease.

  • Monitoring of the water balance (in patient charts).

  • Gentle diet without salt restriction. During the oligoanuria phase, protein-rich foods (meat, fish, legumes) and potassium-rich foods (vegetables, fruits) are excluded. During the polyuria stage, these foods are necessary. For nutritional support of patients with AKI, enteral and parenteral nutrition formulas in combination can be used.

3.1 Conservative Treatment

3.1.1. Etiotropic (antiviral) therapy.

Goal of therapy:

- suppression of HFRS virus replication;

- reduction of disease severity;

- decrease in the risk of specific complications.

It is recommended to initiate treatment with direct-acting antiviral drugs in a hospital setting no later than 48 hours from the onset of the disease in patients with HFRS to suppress virus replication [24, 26, 33, 39, 48, 50, 52, 55, 59, 62, 66, 68].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended to prescribe #ribavirin** to patients with moderate and severe HFRS to suppress virus replication [66].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: #ribavirin** is prescribed according to the regimen: 200 mg (one capsule) 5 times a day (1000 mg per day), the treatment course is 5 days [12].

Data on the efficacy of ribavirin treatment are contradictory. In a study of ribavirin treatment in 242 patients with confirmed HFRS in China [55], morbidity and mortality were significantly reduced, supporting efficacy when administered early before clinical signs appeared. In contrast, a clinical trial on the treatment of HFRS caused by PUUV infection conducted in Russia showed that intravenous administration of ribavirin does not alter viral load kinetics [59]. If oral forms of ribavirin cannot be taken, IV ribavirin can be used with an initial dose of 33 mg/kg, followed by 16 mg/kg every 6 hours for 4 days, and 8 hours after the last of these doses, 8 mg/kg every 8 hours for 3 days (7 days in total) [12]. The efficacy of intravenous ribavirin cannot be assessed in either of these trials [52,62,68]. Similar survival curves were observed in patients receiving ribavirin compared to HFRS patients over the same time period or patients receiving placebo [52]. Most completed clinical trials showed anemia, which is reversible after completion of ribavirin therapy [59]. In addition, some patients developed hyperbilirubinemia, sinus bradycardia, and rash.

3.1.2 Pathogenetic and symptomatic therapy for HFRS patients in a hospital setting depending on the period of the disease

It is recommended to provide baseline therapy to all HFRS patients, regardless of disease severity, to reduce intoxication [1, 4, 5, 12, 31, 34, 47, 64, 66].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: baseline therapy includes bed rest, diet, and oral detoxification in the form of fluid intake up to 2 liters per day (tea, rosehip decoction, drinking water, alkaline mineral waters) taking into account daily diuresis. The diet includes easily digestible foods rich in vitamins (lean meats, fish, dairy products, boiled vegetables, juices, compotes). Alcohol in any form is prohibited.

3.1.2.1 Pathogenetic and symptomatic therapy for patients with HFRS in the initial (febrile) period of the disease

It is recommended to administer infusion detoxification therapy (solutions affecting water and electrolyte balance) to patients with moderate and severe HFRS to manage the intoxication syndrome and prevent complications [1, 4, 5, 23, 31, 34, 47, 64, 66, 75].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: detoxification therapy aims to relieve the intoxication syndrome; its volume depends on the severity of the patient's condition, blood electrolyte levels, hematocrit, daily diuresis, and the presence or risks of complications. If necessary, provide controlled infusion therapy in case of hypovolemia, but avoid volume overload. Infusion therapy should be carried out under control and monitoring. The total amount of fluid administered parenterally up to the 5th–6th day of the disease may exceed the excreted volume by no more than 750 ml, and later, at the peak of renal failure, by 500 ml, taking into account fever and hematocrit levels.

It is recommended in the presence of hypovolemia to take urgent measures to restore circulating blood volume [14, 74, 99, 100, 101].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: timely initiated infusion therapy restores circulatory volume and renal perfusion. Infusion therapy must be carried out under control and monitoring [14, 74], as uncontrolled infusion therapy itself carries risks of AKI due to edema of the renal parenchyma and other organs. Fluid replacement can be performed using various types of infusion solutions (crystalloids, colloids, or combinations thereof). Isotonic crystalloids are the primary solutions used to replenish extracellular fluid deficit. Colloids theoretically promote a faster increase in volemia compared to crystalloids, but this effect depends on vascular wall permeability, which is impaired in HFRS [16, 37]. Human albumin** is preferred for correcting hypo-oncotic hypovolemia. It increases sensitivity to diuretics in patients with hypoalbuminemia [14]. Crystalloids are the primary infusion solutions for replacing circulating blood volume deficit [14, 74].

It is recommended to treat emergency conditions developing in HFRS in the intensive care unit [12, 31, 34, 39, 56, 58, 73, 74].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: in severe disease, high viremia, intoxication, activation of the hormonal and immune systems, production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, massive vasopathy (tropism of hantavirus to microvascular endothelium, release of pro-inflammatory cytokines), hypovolemia, microcirculation disorders, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) with consumption coagulopathy, and tissue destruction cause the development of septic shock, AKI, and DIC syndrome. Treatment in this case will be carried out in accordance with clinical guidelines for emergency conditions in the intensive care unit [74].

It is recommended to prescribe stress (low/moderate) doses of systemic glucocorticoids to patients with severe HFRS, including in the development of septic shock with multiorgan dysfunction, for anti-inflammatory purposes [3, 4, 31, 34, 39, 64, 73, 74, 84].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: Indications for the use of glucocorticoids: septic shock, cerebral edema, pronounced inflammatory syndrome with multiorgan dysfunction.

It is recommended to prescribe nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs or anilides to HFRS patients with hyperthermia above 38.5°C, muscle and joint pain for antipyretic, analgesic, and anti-inflammatory purposes [3, 4, 23, 31, 39, 64].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: Indications for the use of these drugs are body temperature rise above 38.5°C, muscle and joint pain. It is necessary to avoid prescribing salicylic acid and its derivatives to patients with hyperthermia for antipyretic purposes, considering the risk of adverse events such as hemostasis disorders and exacerbation of gastric and duodenal ulcers (according to the instructions for use).

3.1.2.2 Pathogenetic and symptomatic therapy for patients with HFRS in the oliguric period of the disease

It is recommended to provide complex therapy to patients in the oliguric period of HFRS to relieve intoxication, azotemia, correct water-electrolyte balance and acid-base state (ABS) of the blood, DIC syndrome, as well as to prevent and treat complications (cerebral edema, pulmonary edema, renal capsule rupture, hemorrhages in vital organs, and bacterial infections) [3, 4, 14, 19, 20, 22, 31, 39, 47, 57, 60, 63].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: For this purpose, solutions affecting water-electrolyte balance, plasma substitutes, blood plasma preparations, etc. are used. Treatment in the event of complications will be carried out according to clinical guidelines for emergency conditions in the intensive care unit [74].

It is recommended for patients with moderate and severe HFRS to undergo conservative treatment of azotemia and water-electrolyte balance disorders to correct uremic intoxication and protein catabolism, correct hemostasis, acidosis, and electrolyte metabolism disorders [3, 4, 14, 16, 31, 39, 47, 75].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: therapy includes solutions affecting water-electrolyte balance, plasma substitutes, blood plasma preparations, etc.

It is recommended in the presence of hypovolemia to take urgent measures to restore circulating blood volume [14, 74, 99, 100, 101].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: infusion therapy initiated in a timely manner helps restore circulatory volume and renal perfusion. Infusion therapy should be performed under control and monitoring [14, 74], as uncontrolled infusion therapy inherently carries the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) due to renal parenchymal edema and edema of other organs. Fluid resuscitation can be carried out using various types of infusion solutions (crystalloids, colloids, or combinations thereof). Isotonic crystalloids are the primary solutions used to replenish extracellular fluid deficits. Compared to crystalloids, colloids theoretically promote a more rapid increase in volemia; however, this effect depends on vascular wall permeability, which is impaired in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) [16, 37]. Human albumin** is preferred for correcting hypo-oncotic hypovolemia. It increases diuretic sensitivity in patients with hypoalbuminemia [14]. Crystalloids are the primary infusion solutions for restoring circulating blood volume deficits [14, 74].

It is recommended to use loop diuretics to control hypervolemia. Parenteral (intravenous) administration of furosemide** is preferred; in case of resistance to initial furosemide** therapy, dose escalation tactics may be considered, although its use in doses exceeding 400 mg/day is unjustified. If maximum diuretic doses are ineffective and symptoms of hypervolemia progress, the issue of renal replacement therapy must be addressed. [14, 102, 103].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: the use of loop diuretics can cause adverse effects in some cases. Considering the mechanism of action of furosemide, its administration under conditions of hypovolemia will promote renal hypoperfusion by reducing left ventricular stroke volume, and will also significantly increase the risk of thromboembolic complications. In AKI, furosemide** does not reduce the need for renal replacement therapy (relative risk 1.02, 95% CI 0.9–1.16, p=0.73) or in-hospital mortality (relative risk 1.12, 95% CI 0.93–1.34, p=0.23) when prescribed for prophylactic or therapeutic purposes in patients with at-risk or established AKI [14, 103]. Therefore, in accordance with KDIGO guidelines, furosemide** should be used only in the presence of hypervolemia [14].

It is recommended to administer stress (low/moderate) doses of systemic glucocorticoids to patients with severe HFRS, including those who develop septic shock with multiorgan dysfunction, for anti-inflammatory purposes [3, 4, 31, 34, 39, 64, 73, 74, 84].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: Indications for glucocorticoid use: septic shock, cerebral edema, pronounced inflammatory syndrome with multiorgan dysfunction. Treatment for acute emergency conditions is carried out in accordance with clinical guidelines [74] in an intensive care unit!

It is recommended to ensure the timely transfer of patients with severe HFRS to the ICU upon the development of septic shock, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), AKI, or multiorgan dysfunction to provide intensive care aimed at managing complications in accordance with the relevant protocol [4, 5, 19, 31, 34, 47, 57, 74, 80].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: treatment in the event of complications shall be carried out in accordance with clinical guidelines for emergency conditions in the ICU [74]. To dynamically assess organ failure and impaired consciousness, standardized rating scales should be used (Appendix G1, G2).

It is recommended to perform hemodialysis in HFRS patients with AKI when conservative measures are ineffective [12, 19, 23, 31, 47, 57, 80].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: renal replacement therapy is performed in accordance with current clinical guidelines for AKI.

3.1.2.3 Pathogenetic and symptomatic therapy for HFRS patients in the polyuric period of the disease

It is recommended to administer rehydration therapy to HFRS patients during the polyuria period to correct dehydration and demineralization (hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypochloremia) [4, 5, 12, 14, 31, 57].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: to restore water-electrolyte balance, solutions affecting water-electrolyte balance are indicated.

It is recommended to prescribe peripheral vasodilators and vitamins to HFRS patients during the polyuria and early convalescence periods for angioprotective, antioxidant, and general tonic purposes, given the development of post-infectious asthenic syndrome and secondary immunodeficiency [4, 5, 14, 15, 23, 31, 57].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

3.2. Surgical treatment

Not performed.

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

It is recommended to initiate rehabilitation measures during the early convalescence period for all HFRS patients to prevent complications resulting from endothelial dysfunction and incomplete recovery of renal function following AKI [4, 5, 23, 39, 40, 42, 45, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: motor activity is gradually expanded, and patients are transferred to ward-based activity. Medical gymnastics is performed daily, predominantly in the form of breathing exercises and simple arm and leg exercises under the supervision of a physical therapy physician. A standard general diet is prescribed, excluding spicy foods and alcohol.

It is recommended to implement a comprehensive rehabilitation program involving various specialists and utilizing diverse modalities for all HFRS patients to prevent complications [4, 5, 39, 40, 42, 45, 92, 94].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

It is recommended to continuously monitor the effectiveness of implemented interventions in all HFRS patients [4, 5, 39, 40, 42, 45, 89, 90, 92, 93, 94].

GPP CLoE 5Level of Evidence/Grade of Recommendation C (level of evidence - 5).

Comments: the rate and degree of recovery of functional status and occupationally significant functions of convalescents are taken into account (using indirect and direct methods). Extension of the sick leave certificate is determined on an individual basis for each case, taking into account the dynamics of clinical and laboratory parameters, the presence or absence of complications, and comorbid somatic diseases.

For one year following hospital discharge, the convalescent should adhere to a balanced diet rich in macroelements, microelements, and vitamins. Spicy foods, spices, and alcohol are excluded from the diet for 12 months.

During the convalescence period, exemption from heavy physical labor, business trips, and sports activities is also indicated; patients should avoid hypothermia, visiting bathhouses (saunas), and jarring or bumpy rides—for 3 months following a mild form of HFRS, 6 months for a moderate form, and 12 months for a severe form.

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

5.1 Specific prevention

Specific vaccine prophylaxis for HFRS is in the registration phase in Russia [15, 23, 66, 68].

5.2 Nonspecific prophylaxis

Falls under the purview of Rospotrebnadzor and executive authorities

It is recommended to implement non-specific prophylactic measures aimed at preventing infection via the aspiration (aerogenic) transmission mechanism involving airborne and dust-borne pathways [10, 25, 38, 44, 75].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment: 1) current disinfection of objects and the entire premises using antiseptics, especially upon first visiting country houses (dachas), camps, or tourist bases

2) use of disposable masks during wet cleaning in residential or industrial premises located in natural foci of HFRS, utilizing disinfectants.

3) creation of conditions guaranteeing compliance with sanitary rules and requirements for the procurement, storage, and sale of food products for individuals vacationing, residing, or working in natural wilderness conditions [10, 25, 38, 44, 75].

4) ensuring widespread and continuous compliance with sanitary and hygienic norms and rules, as well as the sanitary and anti-epidemic regime in children's sanatoriums, holiday homes, educational institutions, healthcare organizations, organized military collectives, and other facilities located in natural foci of infection, with provisions for personal hygiene (regular handwashing, consumption of safe drinking water) [10, 25, 38, 44, 75].

5.3 Clinical follow-up (dispensary observation)

It is recommended that all HFRS convalescents be placed under follow-up dispensary observation by an infectious disease specialist at the outpatient infectious disease clinic to timely detect residual effects and complications and ensure complete recovery [4, 5, 34, 40, 42, 45, 75, 89, 94].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended that follow-up medical examinations of the patient after discharge be carried out at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months in an outpatient setting, including a clinical examination by an infectious disease specialist (or a general practitioner/district physician if unavailable), a complete blood count, a urinalysis, a general routine biochemical blood test (levels of urea, creatinine, total protein, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase), electrocardiography in standard leads, and renal ultrasound for the timely diagnosis of complications and sequelae of the disease [4, 5, 12, 34, 40, 42, 45, 75, 89, 94].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comment: Diagnosing the sequelae of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) in some cases requires targeted diagnostic laboratory and instrumental methods, and consultations with specialists. In addition, during the monitoring of this category of patients, various expert issues may arise concerning professional activities, military service, determination of disability groups, etc. Therefore, it is advisable to divide the scope of diagnostic and therapeutic care into two stages.

The first stage is carried out at the outpatient clinic level by an infectious disease specialist or general practitioner/district physician in collaboration with a neurologist, nephrologist, and, if necessary, other outpatient subspecialists.

The second stage is used when pathology is detected that requires a more detailed clinical, laboratory, and instrumental examination, as well as when expert issues need to be resolved. At the second stage, physicians and diagnostic services of specialized hospital departments are involved in the diagnostic and therapeutic process.

In the absence of complaints and internal organ abnormalities upon the expiration of the follow-up period, patients who have suffered from HFRS are discharged from the patient registry.

6. Organization of Medical Care

It is recommended to hospitalize HFRS patients regardless of the severity of the disease and premorbid background at the earliest possible stages of the disease [3, 4, 5, 23, 31, 34, 39, 64].

Level CLevel 5Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 5).

Comments: given the absence of pathognomonic symptoms in the febrile period of HFRS, and the overlap in the seasonal incidence peak of HFRS and other natural focal febrile diseases (tick-borne encephalitis, Lyme disease, leptospirosis), provisional hospitalization of febrile patients in a hospital is justified.

It is recommended to urgently revise the management tactics for an HFRS patient upon the appearance of signs (symptoms) of a progressive disease course [3, 4, 7, 20, 31, 34, 39, 43, 46, 56, 58, 64].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Comments: 1) in case of symptoms indicating impaired oxygen supply to the body against the background of hemodynamic disorders (development of shock), severe weakness, dizziness, acrocyanosis or total skin cyanosis, shortness of breath, hypotension, tachycardia, oligoanuria, hypoxia detected by pulse oximetry readings;

2) in case of symptoms indicating CNS complications (impaired consciousness ranging from lethargy to cerebral coma, psychomotor agitation, clonic-tonic seizures, focal symptoms);

3) upon the appearance of hemorrhagic syndrome (extensive skin ecchymoses, mucosal hemorrhages [subconjunctival, hemorrhagic enanthema on the soft palate], epistaxis, "coffee ground" vomiting), usually against the background of worsening renal failure (oligoanuria, dry mouth, thirst, anorexia, lower back and abdominal pain).

Discharge from the medical organization is recommended upon persistent improvement of the clinical picture: normalization of body temperature, resolution of disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) syndrome and acute kidney injury (AKI), decrease in post-infectious asthenic syndrome, normal diuresis, azotemia (urea, creatinine), hemogram, and absence of pyuria and microhematuria [4, 5, 14, 23, 31, 40, 42, 57].

GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Medical care is provided in the following forms:

  • emergency medical care;

  • urgent medical care;

Conditions for the provision of medical services

Medical care is provided in the form of:

  • primary health care;

  • emergency medical care, including specialized emergency medical care;

  • specialized medical care, including high-tech medical care.

Medical care for patients with suspected "HFRS" is provided in a hospital setting, ensuring round-the-clock medical monitoring and treatment.

Primary health care is provided to patients in outpatient settings:

  • at feldsher-midwifery stations by mid-level medical personnel.

  • by a general practitioner/district physician, or a general practitioner (family physician) in an outpatient setting.

Primary specialized health care is provided by an infectious disease specialist of a medical organization providing outpatient care (clinic). When HFRS is suspected or detected in a patient at the outpatient stage, the district physician, general practitioner (family physician), infectious disease specialist, or mid-level medical worker of the medical organization refers the patient for inpatient hospitalization to receive specialized medical care.

Specialized, including high-tech, medical care is provided in an inpatient setting by infectious disease specialists and other medical specialists and includes the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions requiring the use of special methods and complex medical technologies, as well as medical rehabilitation.

Treatment of HFRS patients is carried out in a hospital setting, where patients are hospitalized upon referral by a district physician, general practitioner (family physician), infectious disease specialist, or medical workers who identified HFRS, ensuring round-the-clock monitoring and treatment.

7. Additional Information

The earliest possible hospitalization is necessary — at the beginning of the febrile period, i.e., in the first 3 days of the disease. Outpatient monitoring of a patient with suspected HFRS is impractical due to the high risks of complications.

The severity of clinical manifestations of HFRS is associated with:

  • the virulence of hantavirus serotypes (Hantaan, Amur, Puumala, Dobrava, Seoul, etc.),

  • genetic features of the macroorganism,

  • presence of concomitant chronic renal pathology,

  • environmental issues,

  • infecting dose,

  • epidemiological features of infection, and other factors.

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

№

Quality criteria

Evaluation of compliance

Yes/no

1

General examination performed by an infectious disease specialist

Yes/no

2

Vital signs assessed – respiratory rate, blood pressure, heart rate, thermometry

Yes/no

3

Complete blood count performed

Yes/no

4

General (clinical) urinalysis performed

Yes/no

5

General clinical biochemical blood test performed (urea, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, total protein, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase)

Yes/no

6

Coagulogram (exploratory assessment of hemostasis) performed

Yes/no

7

Laboratory testing (IFA, ELISA) performed to identify the pathogen of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS):

- determination of class M antibodies (IgM) to hantaviruses, the causative agents of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, in the blood;

- determination of class G antibodies (IgG) to hantaviruses, the causative agents of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, in the blood.

- detection of hantavirus RNA – the causative agents of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in the blood by PCR (if registered test systems are available)

Yes/no

8

Kidney ultrasound performed

Yes/no

9

Consultation by an anesthesiologist-resuscitologist performed for patients with toxic shock syndrome, acute kidney injury, or other emergency conditions, and transfer to the ICU carried out

Yes/no

10

Discharge from the medical organization performed upon sustained clinical improvement: normalization of body temperature, relief of DIC syndrome, acute kidney injury, decrease in post-infectious asthenic syndrome, normal urine output, azotemia (urea, creatinine), hemogram, and absence of pyuria and microhematuria.

Yes/no

References

Show references
  1. Valishin D.A., Burganova A.N., Khunafina D.Kh. et al. Clinical and epidemiological features of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome // Infectious Diseases. 2014. Vol. 12. No. S1. P. 58.

  2. Valishin D.A., Murzabaeva R.T., Galimov R.R. et al. Clinical and laboratory parallels in novel coronavirus infection COVID-19 and hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome // Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 3 (87). P. 86-90.

  3. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Current issues of pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostics, and treatment / Pavlov V.N., Fazlyeva R.M., Mirsaeva G.Kh. et al. - Moscow, 2019. – 150 p.

  4. Dovgalyuk, T.I. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up care under conditions of increased incidence / T.I. Dovgalyuk, S.N. Orlova, V.F. Chernobrovy et al. // Bulletin of the Ivanovo Medical Academy. - 2007. – Vol. 12. - No. 3-4. – P. 89-90.

  5. Starostina, V.I. Modern view on the pathogenesis of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome / V.I. Starostina, V.V. Speransky, D.A. Valishin // Medical Bulletin of Bashkortostan. – 2008. – Vol. 3. - No. 3. - P. 57-62.

  6. Dzagurova T.K., Murzabaeva R.T., Kutluguzhina F.G. et al. Significance of antibodies excreted in urine in specific diagnostics of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome // Russian Journal of Infection and Immunity. 2022. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 527-534.

  7. Ivanov M.F., Balmasova I.P., Zhestkov A.V. Immunopathogenetic features and prognostic criteria for severe hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome // RUDN Journal of Medicine. 2020. Vol. 24. No. 3. P. 207-217.

  8. Ivanov M.F., Balmasova I.P., Malova E.S. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: humoral immune response // Allergology and Immunology. 2020. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 5-12.

  9. Ivanova A.V., Popov N.V., Karnaukhov I.G., Chumachkova E.A. Hantavirus diseases: a review of the epidemiological situation and epidemiological risks in world regions // Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections. 2021, No. 1, P. 23-31.

  10. Ivanova, A.V., Safronov, V.A., Popov, N.V., & Kuklev, E.V. (2020). Epidemiological zoning of the Volga Federal District territory by the level of potential epidemic hazard of natural foci of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections*, (1), 91-96.

  11. Ivanis, V.A. (2008). Modern concepts of the pathogenesis of hantavirus infection. *Pacific Medical Journal*, (2), 15-19.

  12. Yushchuk, N.D., & Vengerov, Yu.Ya. (Eds.). (2019). *Infectious Diseases: National Guidelines*. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 1104 p. (pp. 894-904).

  13. Kiryanov, N.A., Mokretsov, A.G., & Sukhanov, S.A. (2019). Pathomorphology of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *International Research Journal*, 1-1(79), 128-131.

  14. Clinical Guidelines «Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)» (2020). Moscow, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 142 p.

  15. Kurashova, S.S., Ishmukhametov, A.A., Egorova, M.S., et al. (2018). Comparative characteristics of inactivating agents for the development of a vaccine against hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention*, 17(4), 26-28.

  16. Latypova, G.R., Khunafina, D.Kh., Valishin, D.A., et al. (2019). Hyperhomocysteinemia and methods of its correction in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Bulletin of the Bashkir State Medical University*, (1), 175-180.

  17. Lobanova, M.V., & Domozhilova, N.E. (2020). Features of the clinical course of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in adults. *Forcipe*, 3(S1), 325.

  18. Starostina, V.I., Valishin, D.A., Murzabaeva, R.T., et al. (2016). Pathophysiological aspects of the pathogenesis of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Transbaikalian Medical Bulletin*, (4), 142-150.

  19. Shakirova, V.G., Martynova, E.V., Saubanova, A.R., et al. (2019). Analysis of renal injury markers in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Practical Medicine*, 17(8), 97-102. doi:10.32000/2072-1757-2019-8-97-102.

  20. Figurnov, V.A., Marunich, N.A., Gavrilov, A.V., & Figurnova, E.V. (2008). Features of clinical manifestation and certain patterns of pathogenesis in severe cases of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Pacific Medical Journal*, (2), 76-78.

  21. Malov, V.A., Nemilostiva, E.A., Nekhaev, S.G., et al. (2020). Clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome depending on the severity of the disease. *Bulletin of Medical Science*, 2(18), 48-52.

  22. Nikiforov, V.S., & Nikishchenkova, Yu.V. (2017). Current capabilities of speckle tracking echocardiography in clinical practice. *Rational Pharmacotherapy in Cardiology*, 13(2), 248-255.

  23. Morozov, V.G., Ishmukhametov, A.A., Dzagurova, T.K., & Tkachenko, E.A. (2017). Clinical features of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Russia. *Medical Council*, (5), 156-161.

  24. Morozov, V.G. (2001). Use of the endogenous interferon inducer amixin for the treatment of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *RMJ*, (15), 656.

  25. Mochalkin, P.A., Mochalkin, A.P., Stepanov, E.G., et al. (2021). Features of the incidence dynamics of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in the Republic of Bashkortostan. *Disinfection Affairs*, 2(116), 44-50.

  26. Murzabaeva, R.T. (2003). Comprehensive evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of viferon in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases*, (4), 34-38.

  27. Mukhetdinova, G.A., Fazlyeva, R.M., Zagidullin, Sh.Z., & Khunafina, D.H. (2012). Pulmonary involvement in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: coincidence or regularity? *Modern Problems of Science and Education*, (1). URL: www.science-education.ru/10v5398/

  28. Mukhetdinova, G.A. (2013). *Clinical and pathogenetic features of lung and heart involvement in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome* ( Doctoral dissertation abstract). Russian Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Ministry of Health of the RF, Moscow, 47 p.

  29. Nekhaev, S.G., & Melnik, L.V. (2018). Current aspects of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (literature review). *Journal of New Medical Technologies. Electronic Edition*, (1), 151-158.

  30. Onishchenko, G.G., & Ezhlova, E.B. (2013). Epidemiological surveillance and prevention of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in the Russian Federation. *Journal of Microbiology, Epidemiology and Immunobiology*, (4), 23-32.

  31. Zagidullin, I.M., Nikulicheva, V.I., Zagidullin, Sh.Z., et al. (2011). Renal replacement therapy in the treatment of acute renal failure in patients with severe hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Practical Medicine*, 3-2(51), 75.

  32. Perevozchikova, A.V., Mirzayanov, G.A., & Shakirov, Sh.N. (2020). Pathological anatomy of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Problems of Biology and Medicine*, 1-1(117), 431.

  33. Prozorov, P.V. (2003). Experience with amixin in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in the eastern Zakamye region. *Kazan Medical Journal*, 84(3), 352-354.

  34. Malov, V.A., Nemilostiva, E.A., Nekhaev, S.G., Tuaeva, A.O., & Potekaeva, S.A. (2020). Clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome depending on the severity of the disease. *Bulletin of Medical Science*, 2(18), 48-52.

  35. Savitskaya, T.A., Ivanova, A.V., Chumachkova, E.A., et al. (2022). Review of hantavirus infections globally and the epidemiological situation regarding hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in the Russian Federation in 2021 with a forecast for 2022. *Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections*, (2), 54-63.

  36. Salukhov, V.V., Kan, E.A., Kovalenko, A.N., et al. (2017). Nephrotic masks of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Treatment and Prevention*, 7(4), 67-71.

  37. Karzakova, L.M., Anisimova, T.A., Efimova, E.V., et al. (2016). Features of cytokine production in various periods of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Acta Medica Eurasica*, (3), 22-28.

  38. Savitskaya, T.A., Ivanova, A.V., Isaeva, G.Sh., et al. (2020). Assessment of the epidemiological situation of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome globally and in Russia, and forecast for 2020. *Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections*, (2), 62-70. doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2020-2-62-70.

  39. Babushkina, F.A., & Fazylov, V.Kh. (2006). Hemostasis status and correction of its disorders in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Practical Medicine*, 4(18), 35-37.

  40. Sirotin, B.Z., Zharsky, S.L., & Tkachenko, E.A. (2002). *Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: consequences, their diagnosis and classification, follow-up medical examination of convalescents*. Khabarovsk, 128 p.

  41. Starostina, V.I., Valishin, D.A., Murzabaeva, R.T., et al. (2016). State of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Transbaikalian Medical Bulletin*, (4), 75-83.

  42. Stulova, M.V., Konstantinov, D.Yu., Popova, L.L., et al. (2022). Prediction of chronic kidney disease in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Science and Innovations in Medicine*, 7(1), 35-38.

  43. Tyugaeva, E.A., Korchagin, V.I., Mironov, K.O., & Platonov, A.E. (2019). Genetic factors determining individual characteristics of the course of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Epidemiology and Vaccinal Prevention*, 18(2), 113-122.

  44. Khaisarova, A.N., Nafeev, A.A., & Shibaeva, E.I. (2021). Epizootiological monitoring of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome as a baseline platform for epidemiological surveillance. *National Priorities of Russia*, 3(42), 294-297.

  45. Khasanova, G.M. (2011). *Comprehensive rehabilitation of patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: monograph*. Ufa: RIC BashGU, 276 p.

  46. Khunafina, D.Kh., Shaykhullina, L.R., Galieva, A.T., et al. (2017). Immunogenetic features of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Eurasian Scientific Association*, 1(3), 86-87.

  47. Shutov, A.M., Astapenko, E.A., Savinova, G.A., et al. (2011). Modern diagnostic criteria for acute kidney injury in patients with hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Ulyanovsk Medico-Biological Journal*, (1), 49-54.

  48. Shaykhullina, L.R., Valishin, D.A., Khunafina, D.H., et al. (2017). Etiotropic therapy of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Infectious Diseases*, 15(S1), 316a.

  49. Shuldyakov, A.A., Lyapina, E.P., Shvaryova, O.A., et al. (2022). Improvement of diagnostics of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Infectious Diseases*, 20(2), 56–62.

  50. Eshmakov, S.V., & Savelyeva, T.V. (2018). Early administration of antiviral drugs in reducing the severity of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. *Proceedings of the Izhevsk State Medical Academy: Collection of Scientific Articles*, Izhevsk, pp. 79-81.

  51. Antoine M, Langlois ME, Bres E Imported haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome caused by Dobrava-Belgrade hantavirus in France. Clin Kidney J. 2020 Feb 21;14(3):1014-1016. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa006. PMID: 33777382; PMCID: PMC7986331.

  52. Chapman L.E., Mertz G.J., Peters C.J., Jolson H.M., Khan A.S., Ksiazek T.G., Koster F.T., Baum K.F., Rollin P.E., Pavia A.T., et al. Intravenous ribavirin for hantavirus pulmonary syndrome: Safety and tolerance during 1 year of open-label experience. Ribavirin study group. Antivir. Ther. 1999;4:211–219.

  53. Che L, Wang Z, Du N, Li L, Zhao Y, Zhang K, Liu Q. Evaluation of Serum Ferritin, Procalcitonin, and C-Reactive Protein for the Prediction of Severity and Mortality in Hemorrhagic Fever With Renal Syndrome. Front Microbiol. 2022 May 23;13:865233. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.865233. PMID: 35677912; PMCID: PMC9169039.

  54. Douglas KO, Payne K, Sabino-Santos G Jr, Agard J. Influence of Climatic Factors on Human Hantavirus Infections in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Systematic Review. Pathogens. 2021 Dec 23;11 (1):15. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11010015. PMID: 35055965; PMCID: PMC8778283.

  55. Huggins J.W., Hsiang C.M., Cosgriff T.M., Guang M.Y., Smith J.I., Wu Z.O., LeDuc J.W., Zheng Z.M., Meegan J.M., Wang Q.N., et al. Prospective, double-blind, concurrent, placebo-controlled clinical trial of intravenous ribavirin therapy of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. J. Infect. Dis. 1991; 164: 1119–1127. doi: 10.1093/infdis/164.6.1119.

  56. Koskela S, Mäkelä S, Strandin T, Vaheri A, Outinen T, Joutsi-Korhonen L,Pörsti I, Mustonen J, Laine O. Coagulopathy in Acute Puumala Hantavirus Infection. Viruses. 2021 Aug 6;13(8):1553. doi: 10.3390/v13081553. PMID: 34452419; PMCID: PMC8402851.

  57. Ricci, Z. Acute Kidney Injury: Diagnosis and Classification in Adults and Children. / Z. Ricci, S. Romagnoli // Contrib Nephrol. – 2018. – Vol. 193. – P. 1- 12. doi:10.1159/000484956

  58. Liu S, Shi TT, Zhao YQ, Gong J. Duodenal bleeding as a rare presenting symptom of haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020. Jan; 32 (1):130-131. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001557. PMID: 31790007

  59. Malinin O.V., Platonov A.E. Insufficient efficacy and safety of intravenous ribavirin in treatment of haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome caused by puumala virus / Malinin O.V., Platonov A.E. // Infectious diseases (London, England). 2017. - Vol. 49. No. 7. - P. 514-520.

  60. Mantula P, Tietäväinen J, Clement J, Niemelä O, Pörsti I, Vaheri A, Mustonen J, Mäkelä S, Outinen T. Flash-Like Albuminuria in Acute Kidney Injury Caused by Puumala Hantavirus Infection. Pathogens. 2020. Jul 28; 9(8):615. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9080615. PMID: 32731475; PMCID: PMC7459820.

  61. Moolla N, Adler D, Blumberg L First report of an imported case of haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2022 Aug 2; 112(8):519-525. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2022.v112i8.16540. PMID: 36214393.

  62. Moreli ML Effectiveness of the ribavirin in treatment of hantavirus infections in the Americas and Eurasia: a meta-analysis. / Moreli ML, Marques-Silva AC, Pimentel VA, da Costa VG. // Virus disease. 2014; 25(3):385-9. doi: 10.1007/s13337-014-0219-7. – Epub. 2014, Jun 4.

  63. Muco E, Hasa A, Rroji A, Kushi A, Puca E, Kraja D. Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in a Patient with Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome. Case Rep Infect Dis. 2020 Feb 28; 2020:1017689. doi: 10.1155/2020/1017689. PMID: 32181028; PMCID: PMC7066413.

  64. Lebecque, O. Puumala hantavirus: an imaging review / O. Lebecque, M. Dupont // Acta Radiol. – 2020. - Vol. 61. - №8. – P. 1072-1079. doi: 10.1177/0284185119889564.

  65. Rao Q, Luo L, Gao L, Xiong W, Nie Q, Wu D. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome presenting as leukemoid reaction and hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. J Med Virol. 2022 Feb; 94 (2):433-435. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27323. Epub 2021 Sep 15. PMID: 34491571.

  66. Rebecca L. Brocato and Jay W. Hooper Progress on the Prevention and Treatment of Hantavirus Disease / Viruses 2019, 11, 610.

  67. Romero MG, Anjum F. Hemorrhagic Fever Renal Syndrome. / Romero MG, Anjum F. // 2022 Jul 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan–.PMID: 32809495.

  68. Szabó R. Antiviral therapy and prevention against hantavirus infections / Szabó R. // Acta Virol. 2017; 61(1):3-12. doi: 10.4149/av-2017-01-3. Review.

  69. Tariq M, Kim DM. Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome: Literature Review, Epidemiology, Clinical Picture and Pathogenesis. / Tariq M, Kim DM // Infect Chemother. 2022 Mar; 54(1):1-19. doi: 10.3947/ic.2021.0148. PMID: 35384417; PMCID: PMC8987181.

  70. Tarvainen M, Mäkelä S, Laine O, Pörsti I, Risku S, Niemelä O, Mustonen J,Jaatinen P. Hormonal Defects Are Common during Puumala Hantavirus Infection and Associate with Disease Severity and Biomarkers of Altered Haemostasis. Viruses. 2021 Sep 13; 13(9):1818. doi: 10.3390/v13091818. PMID: 34578397; PMCID: PMC8472102.

  71. Zhang R, Mao Z, Yang J The changing epidemiology of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in Southeastern China during 1963-2020: A retrospective analysis of surveillance data. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Aug 6; 15(8):e0009673. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009673. PMID: 34358248; PMCID: PMC8372920.

  72. Lederer S, Lattwein E, Hanke M, Sonnenberg K, Stoecker W, Lundkvist Å, Vaheri A, Vapalahti O, Chan PK, Feldmann H, Dick D, Schmidt-Chanasit J, Padula P, Vial PA, Panculescu-Gatej R, Ceianu C, Heyman P, Avšič-Županc T, Niedrig M. Indirect immunofluorescence assay for the simultaneous detection of antibodies against clinically important old and new world hantaviruses. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013 Apr 4;7(4):e2157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002157. Erratum in: PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Nov 9;14(11):e0008864.

  73. Manakhov K.M. Renal impairment and renocardiac syndrome in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome // Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Med.) Diss., Izhevsk State Medical Academy of the Russian Ministry of Health, Izhevsk, 2021.

  74. Clinical guidelines "Sepsis (in adults)", Moscow, 2024.

  75. Borodina Zh.I., Tsarenko Olga Evgenyevna, Manakhov K.M., Bagautdinova L.I. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: a modern challenge // The Arkhiv Vnutrenney Meditsiny. 2019. No. 6 (50). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gemorragicheskaya-lihoradka-s-pochechnym-sindromom-problema-sovremennosti

  76. Diagnostics and intensive care of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Clinical guidelines of the All-Russian Public Organization "Association of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists" / A.I. Yaroshetskiy, A.I. Gritsan, S.N. Avdeev et al. // Anesteziologiya i reanimatologiya. – 2020. - No. 2. – p. 5-39.

  77. Sanitary and epidemiological rules SanPiN 3.3686-21 "Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for the prevention of infectious diseases" (approved by the Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation No. 4 of January 28, 2021).

  78. Tariq M, Kim DM. Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome: Literature Review, Epidemiology, Clinical Picture and Pathogenesis // Infect Chemother. 2022 Mar;54(1):1-19. doi: 10.3947/ic.2021.0148.PMID: 35384417 Free PMC article. Review.

  79. Lu W, Kuang L, Hu Y, Shi J, Li Q, Tian W. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of death from hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome: a meta-analysis // Front Microbiol. 2024 Apr 4;15:1329683. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1329683. eCollection 2024.PMID: 38638893.

  80. Koehler FC, Di Cristanziano V, Späth MR, Hoyer-Allo KJR, Wanken M, Müller RU, Burst V. The kidney in hantavirus infection-epidemiology, virology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management // Clin Kidney J. 2022 Jan 29;15(7):1231-1252. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac008. eCollection 2022 Jul.PMID: 35756741

  81. Jiang, H. Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome: Pathogenesis and Clinical Picture / H. Jiang, H. Du, L.M. Wang et al. // Front Cell Infect Microbiol. – 2016. - Vol. 6. – P. 1. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00001

  82. Kitterer, D. Electrocardiographic abnormalities and relative bradycardia in patients with hantavirus-induced nephropathia epidemica. / D. Kitterer, S. Greulich, S. Grün et al. // Eur J Intern Med. – 2016. – Vol. 33. – P. 67-73. doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2016.06.001.

  83. Laine, O. Hantavirus infection-induced thrombocytopenia triggers increased production but associates with impaired aggregation of platelets except for collagen / O. Laine, L. Joutsi-Korhonen, R. Lassila et al. // Thromb Res. – 2015. – Vol. 136. - №6. – P. 1126-1132. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2015.10.003

  84. Martinuč Bergoč, M. Successful treatment of severe hantavirus nephritis with corticosteroids: a case report and literature review. / M. Martinuč Bergoč, J. Lindič, D. Kovač et al. // Ther Apher Dial. – 2013. – Vol. 17. - №4. – P. 402-406. doi:10.1111/1744-9987.12086

  85. Puljiz, I. Electrocardiographic changes in patients with haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome / I. Puljiz, I. Kuzman, A. Markotić et al. // Scand J Infect Dis. - 2005. - Vol. 37. - №8 – P. 594-598. doi:10.1080/00365540510036606

  86. Galimova S.Sh., Abrakhmanova N.I., Sebyakina I.D. et al. Thrombocytopenia and C-reactive protein as markers of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome complicated by acute kidney injury // BULLETIN OF MODERN CLINICAL MEDICINE 2024 Volume 17, Issue 6, P. 13-18.

  87. Galimova E.F., Galimova S.Sh., Galimov K.Sh. et al. Method for predicting the severity of the clinical course of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome based on C-reactive protein level - Patent for invention RU 2828321 C1, 09.10.2024. Application No. 2024110421 dated 17.04.2024.

  88. Method for early differential diagnostics of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome / Suzdaltsev A.A., Popova L.L., Konstantinov D.Yu., Nedugov G.V., Stulova M.V., Lyubushkina A.V. // RF Patent 2018142703, 03.12.2018 // Patent No. 2683955. 2019.

  89. Dudarev, M.V. Clinical and functional characteristics of the consequences of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and their therapeutic correction at the outpatient rehabilitation stage : abstract of Dr. Sci. (Med.) Diss. : 14.00.05 / Dudarev Mikhail Valeryevich. – Ufa, 2005. – 47 p. 30.

  90. Dudarev M.V. Long-term outcomes and development of chronic renal failure in survivors of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome / M.V. Dudarev, L.T. Pimenov // Terapevticheskii Arkhiv. – 2008. – Vol. 80, No. 6. - P. 59-62.

  91. Zharsky S.L. Consequences of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (diagnostic and health surveillance issues): abstract of Dr. Sci. (Med.) Diss. : 14.00.05 / Zharsky Sergey Leonidovich. – Khabarovsk, 2001. – 44 p.

  92. Pimenov L.T. Cardiological aspects of the post-hospital rehabilitation period in convalescents of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome / L.T. Pimenov, M.V. Dudarev, I.V. Tsyplyashova // Kardiologiya. – 2005. – Vol. 45, No. 10. – P. 54.

  93. Boris G.D. Relationship between the functional state of the kidneys and arterial hypertension in survivors of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome 14.01.04 – Internal diseases Abstract of the dissertation for the academic degree of Candidate of Medical Sciences Perm 2016. 24 p.

  94. Artamonova I.V. Health surveillance of patients in the rehabilitation office for HFRS convalescents / Mukhetdinova G.A., Fazlyeva R.M., Boris G.D., Nelyubin E.V. // Bulletin of the Bashkir State Medical University – 2013. - No. 4. – P.9-13.

  95. Lyubushkina A.V., Popova L.L., Nedugov G.V. et al. Prognostication of the severity of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome // Journal of Infectology. 2019. - Vol. 11. No. 2. - P. 35-39.

  96. Maksema I.G., Afanasyeva V.V., Slonova R.A. et al. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in pregnant women in Primorsky Krai // Epidemiology and Infectious Diseases - 2013. - No. 2. - P. 47-50.

  97. Figurnov V.A., Marunich N.A., Gavrilov A.V., Figurnova E.V. Long-term consequences of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in a woman during pregnancy. Klinicheskaya Meditsina. – 2007. - No. 5. – P.71–72.

  98. Karetkina G.N., Ayupova O.V., Arseneva T.V. et al. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and pregnancy. Clinical case report. // Infectious Diseases: News, Opinions, Training. 2017. No. 3. P. 99-104. DOI: 10.24411/2305-3496-2017-00057

  99. Himmelfarb J, Joannidis M, Molitoris B, Schietz M, Okusa MD, Warnock D, Laghi F, Goldstein SL, Prielipp R, Parikh CR, Pannu N, Lobo SM, Shah S, D’Intini V, Kellum JA (2008) Evaluation and in itial management of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:962–967.

  100. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W. et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43:304–377.

  101. Prowle JR, Kirwan CJ, Bellomo R. Fluid management for the prevention and attenuation of acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol 2014; 10:37–47.

  102. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int Suppl 2012; Issue 1: 1–126.

  103. Ho KM, Power BM. Benefits and risks of furosemide in acute kidney injury. Anaesthesia. 2010 Mar;65(3):283-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06228.x. Epub 2010 Jan 19. PMID: 20085566.

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

  1. Bakhtina Viktoriya Aleksandrovna, Chief Physician, Specialized Clinical Infectious Diseases Hospital of the Ministry of Health of Krasnodar Krai, Candidate of Medical Sciences

  2. Valishin Damir Askhatovich, Head of the Department of Infectious Diseases, Bashkir State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences

  3. Gorelov Aleksandr Vasilyevich, Deputy Director for Research, Central Research Institute of Epidemiology of Rospotrebnadzor, Head of the Department of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry of the Russian Ministry of Health, Academician of the RAS, Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences

  4. Gorodin Vladimir Nikolayevich, Head of the Department of Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Kuban State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences

  5. Dmitriev Aleksandr Sergeyevich, Head of the Center for Epidemically Significant Infectious Diseases, National Medical Research Center for Phthisiopulmonology and Infectious Diseases of the Russian Ministry of Health, Infectious Diseases Physician, Candidate of Medical Sciences

  6. Ivanis Viktoriya Aleksandrovna, Professor of the Department of Infectious Diseases, Pacific State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Doctor of Medical Sciences

  7. Murzabaeva Rasima Timeryarovna, Professor of the Department of Infectious Diseases, Bashkir State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Doctor of Medical Sciences

  8. Novak Kseniya Egorovna, Associate Professor of the Department of Adult Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor

  9. Suzdaltsev Aleksey Aleksandrovich, Professor of the Department of Infectious Diseases with a Course of Epidemiology, Samara State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Doctor of Medical Sciences

  10. Fazylov Vildan Khayrullayevich, Professor of the Department of Infectious Diseases, Kazan State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences

  11. Chulanov Vladimir Petrovich, Deputy Director for Research and Innovative Development, National Medical Research Center for Phthisiopulmonology and Infectious Diseases of the Russian Ministry of Health, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor

  12. Shaikhullina Liana Robertovna, Associate Professor of the Department of Infectious Diseases, Bashkir State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Specialist at the Center for Clinical Virology, National Medical Research Center for Phthisiopulmonology and Infectious Diseases of the Russian Ministry of Health, Candidate of Medical Sciences

  13. Esaulenko Elena Vladimirovna, Head of the Department of Adult Infectious Diseases and Epidemiology, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor, Doctor of Medical Sciences

All working group members are members of the Academician V.I. Pokrovsky National Association of Infectious Disease Specialists

There is no conflict of interest.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience of the clinical guidelines:

  1. Infectious disease specialist;

  2. General practitioner (internist);

  3. General practitioner (family physician);

  4. Medical students

  5. Residents

In these clinical guidelines, all data are ranked by level of reliability (evidence) depending on the quantity and quality of studies on the issue.

Determination of levels of evidence and grades of recommendation for diagnostic interventions

Table A1 – Levels of evidence certainty for diagnostic interventions

LoE

Hierarchy of clinical research designs in descending order of levels of evidence certainty from 1 to 5

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard that is not independent of the evaluated method

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

1 The generally accepted standard for diagnostic intervention clinical trials is a cross-sectional study design, in which the investigational diagnostic method and the reference method—serving as the "gold standard" for diagnosing the studied disease or condition—are applied to each included patient in parallel and under identical conditions. The investigational and reference methods must be applied independently of each other (i.e., the investigational method cannot be part of the reference method) and must be interpreted by the investigator without knowledge of the results obtained from the other method (blinding is recommended)

Table S2 – Levels of clinical usefulness (LCU) grading scale for diagnostic interventions

GoR

Hierarchy of clinical research designs in descending order of levels of evidence certainty from 1 to 5

A

Unambiguous (strong) recommendation (all evaluated efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or moderate methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

C

Ambiguous (conditional) recommendation (not all efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or satisfactory methodological quality and/or their results regarding the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Low (weak) recommendation – lack of adequate quality evidence (all evaluated efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Table P3. Possible combinations of LCE and GGR for diagnostic interventions

LoE

Criteria for determining GGR

Final

GoR

1=Highest quality evidence: systematic reviews of studies with reference-standard controls

Both of the following conditions are met:

1. All studies are of high or

fair methodological quality;

2. Study findings for the outcomes

outcomes are consistent*

A

Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions:

1. Not all studies are of high or fair methodological quality;

2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are not consistent*

C

Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions:

1. All studies have low

methodological quality;

2. Study findings for the outcomes

of interest are inconsistent*

C

2 = Individual studies with control by a reference method

Both of the following conditions are met:

1. All studies are of high or satisfactory methodological quality;

2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are consistent*

A

Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions:

1. Not all studies are of high or fair methodological quality;

2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are not consistent*

C

Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions:

1. All studies are of low methodological quality;

2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are not consistent*

C

3 = Studies without sequential control by a reference method or studies with a reference method that is not independent of the evaluated method

Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions:

1. Not all studies are of high or fair methodological quality;

2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are not consistent*

C

Fulfilling at least one of the following conditions:

1. All studies are of low methodological quality;

2. Study conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are not consistent*

C

4 = Non-comparative studies, case series/case report

C

5 = Least reliable evidence: only a rationale for the mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

C

*If a single clinical trial is evaluated, this condition is not taken into account

Determination of the levels of credibility of evidence and grades of recommendation for therapeutic, rehabilitation, and preventive interventions

Table S4 – Levels of evidence (LoE) for therapeutic, rehabilitative, and preventive interventions

LoE

Hierarchy of clinical research designs in descending order of levels of evidence certainty from 1 to 5

1

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design except randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only a justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinions are available

Table P5 – Scale for determining the grades of recommendation for therapeutic, rehabilitation, and preventive interventions

GoR

Definition

A

Unambiguous (strong) recommendation (all evaluated efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or moderate methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

C

Ambiguous (conditional) recommendation (not all efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or satisfactory methodological quality and/or their results regarding the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Low (weak) recommendation – lack of adequate quality evidence (all evaluated efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines

Clinical guidelines are updated every 3 years.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

These clinical guidelines were developed taking into account the following regulatory legal documents:

  1. Federal Law No. 157-FZ of September 17, 1998, "On Immunoprophylaxis of Infectious Diseases".

  2. Federal Law of the Russian Federation No. 326-FZ of November 29, 2010, "On Compulsory Medical Insurance in the Russian Federation".

  3. Federal Law No. 323-FZ of November 21, 2011, "On the Fundamentals of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation".

  4. Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia No. 494 of August 9, 2005, "On the Procedure for the Use of Medicinal Products in Patients for Vital Indications".

  5. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 804n of October 13, 2017, "On Approval of the Nomenclature of Medical Services".

  6. Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of Russia No. 69n of January 31, 2012, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Adult Patients with Infectious Diseases".

  7. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 205n of May 2, 2023, "On Approval of the Nomenclature of Positions of Medical and Pharmaceutical Workers".

  8. Order of the Ministry of Health of Russia No. 700n of October 7, 2015, "On the Nomenclature of Specialties of Specialists with Higher Medical and Pharmaceutical Education".

  9. Order of the Ministry of Labor of Russia No. 374n of July 26, 2024, "On Approval of Classifications and Criteria Used in Medical and Social Assessment of Citizens by Federal Medical and Social Assessment Institutions".

  10. Order of the Ministry of Health of Russia No. 203n dated May 10, 2017, "On Approval of Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Medical Care."

  11. Sanitary and Epidemiological Rules SanPiN 3.3686-21 "Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for the prevention of infectious diseases" (approved by the Resolution of the Chief State Sanitary Doctor of the Russian Federation No. 4 of January 28, 2021).

  12. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 330 dated August 5, 2003, "On measures to improve therapeutic nutrition in medical and preventive institutions of the Russian Federation."

  13. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 395n dated June 21, 2013, "On Approval of Medical Nutrition Standards."

  14. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 1008 dated September 23, 2020, "On approval of the procedure for providing patients with medical nutrition".

Criteria for assessing the severity of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome

Mild form

Moderate form

Severe form

  • minimal febrile period (2–5 days), body temperature no higher than 38°,

  • short-term headache,

  • hemorrhagic manifestations in the form of sparse petechial rash on the skin and mucous membranes;

  • slight decrease in diuresis (750–1000 ml of urine per day); short duration

  • urine specific gravity decreases, sediment contains single erythrocytes, trace protein, casts;

  • nitrogen metabolism parameters within the normal range;

  • weakly positive Pasternatsky's sign;

  • peripheral blood analysis shows normocytosis.

  • acute onset,

  • moderate intoxication (headache, nausea, occasional vomiting, fever above 39°C, myalgia, arthralgia)

  • duration of fever 5–7 days.

  • clearly pronounced hemorrhagic syndrome – hemorrhages in the sclerae, conjunctivae, petechial rash on the skin, hemorrhages at injection sites, mild epistaxis.

  • oliguria (less than 500 ml of urine for 1–3 days),

  • hyperazotemia (blood urea up to 19 mmol/l, blood creatinine 220–300 µmol/l), hyperkalemia up to 5 mmol/l, acidosis with base deficit (7.2–7.3 mmol/l).

  • oliguria with decreased specific gravity, presence of significant proteinuria in sediment (up to 3.3 g/l), microhematuria, casts.

  • positive Pasternatsky's sign, lower back pain, moderate abdominal pain.

  • hemogram shows moderate leukocytosis, increased hematocrit, thrombocytopenia down to 1.5×106/l.

  • pronounced intoxication (severe headache, persistent hiccup, nausea, repeated vomiting, fever above 39.5°C, visual disturbances, sleep disorders, lethargy, myalgia, arthralgia)

  • pronounced hemorrhagic syndrome: hemorrhages on the skin and mucous membranes, profuse epistaxis, bleeding from internal organs.

  • oligoanuria (less than 350 ml of urine per day for 1–3 days), or anuria (less than 50 ml per day),

  • significant proteinuria (more than 3.3 g/l), hematuria, cylindruria

  • pronounced hyperazotemia – blood urea above 20 mmol/l, blood creatinine up to 600 µmol/l, plasma potassium up to 6.0 mmol/l, acidosis with BE up to 6 mmol/l.

  • sharply positive Pasternatsky's sign, peritoneal signs are often determined.

  • hemogram shows hyperleukocytosis, pronounced thrombocytopenia.

  • complicated forms of the disease

Severity criteria for hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (in points)

Syndrome, symptom

Points

Hemodynamic disorders:

- Blood pressure 100 mm Hg

- Blood pressure 100 mm Hg

- Blood pressure 80 mm Hg

- Shock clinic

1

4

17

17

Hemorrhagic syndrome:

- hemorrhages on the skin and mucous membranes

- non-life-threatening bleeding

- life-threatening bleeding

1

4

17

Renal syndrome:

- oliguria 500 ml/day or less for 24–48 hours

- oliguria 500 ml/day or less for 72 hours or more

- anuria (less than 50 ml/day)

1

4

17

Serum creatinine:

- 0.22–0.88 µmol/l

- over 0.88 µmol/l

4

17

- kidney rupture

17

- cerebral symptoms (cerebral edema, etc.)

17

- pulmonary edema

17

Severity degrees of HFRS:

mild – up to 3 points

moderate – up to 16 points

severe – 17 points and more.

Differential diagnosis of HFRS

Diseases to differentiate

Common symptoms

Differences

Influenza

acute onset of the disease, intoxication, high fever, headache and muscle pain, facial flushing, oropharyngeal mucosa hyperemia, injected sclerae

in HFRS – characteristic epidemiological history, appearance of recurrent vomiting, epigastric and lower back pain, frequent absence of catarrhal syndrome, blood test shows signs of hemoconcentration, thrombocytopenia

Leptospirosis

summer seasonality, acute onset, chills, fever, lower back and abdominal pain, facial flushing, injected sclerae

intense muscle pain, hepatosplenomegaly, development of a secondary fever wave, appearance of a maculopapular rash on the body, characteristic epidemiological history, detection of an increasing antibody titer to leptospires

Typhoid fever

marked intoxication, fever, anorexia, bradycardia, hypotension, hepatosplenomegaly, leukopenia

typhoid fever is characterized by a gradual onset, pallor of the skin, lethargy, flatulence, tenderness in the right iliac region, appearance of a roseolous rash on the abdominal wall on days 8–10, and specific epidemiological history features

Tick-borne encephalitis

seasonality, acute onset, severe headaches, vomiting

epidemiological history characteristic of tick-borne encephalitis, predominant CNS involvement, biphasic fever pattern, absence of renal manifestations

Acute pyelonephritis

lower back pain, chills, fever, positive Pasternatsky sign

Pyelonephritis is characterized by a history of exposure to cold, unilateral lower back pain, rapid defervescence with antibiotic therapy, prominent leukocyturia, moderate proteinuria in urinalysis, and leukocytosis with a left shift in the complete blood count

Acute surgical pathology of the abdominal organs

presence of severe abdominal pain with moderate abdominal muscle rigidity, vomiting, and neutrophilic leukocytosis

in hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS), abdominal pain is rarely isolated and is accompanied by lower back pain; positive Pasternatsky sign; oligoanuria; hyperazotemia; hemorrhagic manifestations, decreased visual acuity

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms — Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome

Appendix C. Patient Information

Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome is an acute viral natural focal disease characterized by high fever, general intoxication, hemorrhagic syndrome, and kidney damage. Severe complications can develop in this disease: infectious-toxic shock, acute renal failure, hemorrhages into vital organs, etc.

The Republic of Siberia is one of the largest disease foci in the world. Murine rodents, primarily the bank vole, and less frequently field and forest mice, serve as the natural reservoir and source of the HFRS virus; they excrete the virus in urine and feces, contaminating the environment. Domestic (synanthropic) mice and rats do not fall ill and do not spread the infection among humans. In natural foci of infection, transmission most commonly occurs via the airborne-dust route during harvesting in garden plots, picking berries and mushrooms in the forest or clearing, cleaning and repairing buildings, and preparing hay, firewood, straw, and forage, etc. Transmission via the alimentary route is also possible through the consumption of foods contaminated with the droppings of infected rodents, or through smoking and eating with unwashed hands. Human-to-human transmission does not occur. The peak incidence is observed in spring and especially in autumn, when conditions are most favorable for mass human contact with nature. Following the disease, persistent immunity is formed, and recurrent infections are very rare. Urban residents predominate among the affected individuals (up to 70–80%).

The disease begins acutely with chills, headache, muscle and joint pain, dry mouth, thirst, sometimes mild cough, and pronounced general weakness. Fever reaches high levels on the very first day of the illness and lasts for an average of 6–7 days. Physical examination reveals flushing of the face, neck, and chest, along with scleral and conjunctival injection. Point hemorrhages (petechial rash) may appear on the inner surfaces of both shoulders, the lateral surfaces of the torso, and the chest («whip» sign), along with hemorrhages at injection sites and brief nosebleeds. Starting from days 3–4 of the illness, a sensation of heaviness in the lower back is noted, accompanied by a decrease in urination frequency and a somewhat reduced urine output. From days 5–6 of the illness, body temperature drops, but general well-being continues to deteriorate, and decreased visual acuity («fog, grid before the eyes») may occur. Lower back pain intensifies, abdominal pain joins, appetite disappears, and patients experience nausea, vomiting unrelated to food intake, and hiccups. Weakness and dizziness increase, and hemorrhages appear in the sclera, skin, and nose. During this period, serious complications of the disease may develop (shock, hemorrhages into various organs, etc.).

It is necessary to consult a physician in a timely manner (within the first 2–3 days of illness). If the physician identifies symptoms suspicious of HFRS, the following tests will be ordered on the same day: complete blood count, urinalysis, and chest radiography if necessary, the results of which help clarify the diagnosis. If the diagnosis is confirmed or suspicion of HFRS persists, the patient is referred to an infectious diseases hospital on the same day. Timely hospitalization allows for the initiation of necessary therapy, prevents the development of complications, and promotes a more rapid recovery.

Bed rest is mandatory in the department until polyuria ceases, averaging: 7–10 days for mild forms, 2–3 weeks for moderate forms, and at least 3–4 weeks from the onset of the disease for severe forms.

Rational nutrition for patients plays an important role. Food should be easily digestible, contain an adequate amount of vitamins, and have no restrictions on table salt. In the first days of the illness, when renal excretory function is not yet impaired, abundant fluid intake is indicated (tea, fruit juices, non-carbonated mineral waters). Nevertheless, the amount of fluid consumed and administered orally should not exceed the volume of output (physiological losses, urine, vomit, stool) by more than 500–700 ml. In the oliguric period, the amount of administered protein should be restricted, as well as foods rich in potassium (prunes, raisins, potatoes). Conversely, potassium-rich foods should be included in the diet during the polyuria stage. Starvation must be avoided, as it enhances protein catabolism and increases azotemia.

Patients who have suffered from HFRS are discharged from the hospital upon normalization of daily urine output, complete blood count, blood biochemistry, and urinalysis. The patient is discharged on an open sick leave certificate, which is extended at the outpatient clinic for approximately 10–15 days in mild cases, 15–20 days in moderate cases, and 25–30 days or more in severe cases. During the first year after discharge from the hospital, convalescents are advised to follow a balanced diet rich in macro- and micronutrients and vitamins, while spicy foods, seasonings, and alcohol are excluded from the diet.

During the convalescence period, the patient is advised to avoid heavy physical labor, jarring rides, hypothermia and overheating, visiting baths and saunas, and sports activities for 3–6–12 months, depending on the severity of the past illness. The pronounced changes in internal organs and systems that develop in HFRS dictate a prolonged course of recovery processes—from 6 to 24 months. Therefore, after discharge from the hospital, individuals who have had HFRS require dispensary follow-up for the timely detection and treatment of the consequences of the disease. Following discharge, clinical examinations are conducted in an outpatient setting at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months by an infectious disease specialist (or local general practitioner if unavailable), including a complete blood count, urinalysis, Nechiporenko urine test, blood biochemistry with determination of urea, creatinine, protein fractions, liver function tests, ECG, and renal ultrasound.

If asthenic syndrome persists (weakness, fatigue, decreased appetite), a sparing regimen, fractional nutrition, multivitamins, B-group vitamins, and herbal medicine (rosehip and lingonberry decoctions) are recommended.

If renal manifestations are present (lower back pain, heavy urination, dry mouth, thirst, hyposthenuria, mild proteinuria, and leukocyturia in urinalysis), antibacterial drugs, urinary antiseptics, microcirculation improvers (pentoxifylline, dipyridamole), and herbal therapy (decoctions of lingonberry, nettle, parsley, bearberry) are recommended according to indications. In the event of post-infectious myocardial dystrophy (weakness, shortness of breath, cardiac pain), a potassium-rich diet, regulated work and rest regimen, and cardiocytoprotectors (meldonium, trimetazidine, B and C vitamins) are prescribed.

In the absence of complaints and internal organ abnormalities upon expiration of the dispensary monitoring period, patients who have recovered from HFRS are deregistered.

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Appendix G1. Glasgow Coma Scale

Russian title: Glasgow Coma Scale

Original name: Glasgow Coma Scale

Source: Teasdale G.M., Jennett B., 1974

Piradov M.A., Suponeva N.A., Ryabinkina Yu.V., Gnedovskaya E.V., Ilyina K.A., Yusupova D.G., et al. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): Linguocultural adaptation of the Russian-language version. N.V. Sklifosovsky Journal of Emergency Medical Care. 2021;10(1):91–99. https://doi.org/10.23934/2223-9022-2021-10-1-91-99

Type: rating scale

Contents:

Sign

Points

1. Eye opening:

Spontaneous

4

To verbal stimuli

3

To pain

2

None

1

2. Verbal response:

appropriate

5

Confused

4

Incoherent words

3

incomprehensible sounds

2

None

1

3. Motor response:

Obeys commands

6

localizes pain

5

Withdrawal response to pain

4

Flexion response to pain (decorticate posturing)

3

Extension response to pain (decerebrate posturing)

2

None

1

Key:

The initial Glasgow Coma Scale score correlates with the severity of cerebral injury and prognosis.

The scale consists of three tests assessing eye-opening, verbal, and motor responses. A specific number of points is awarded for each test. The eye-opening test ranges from 1 to 4 points, the verbal response test from 1 to 5 points, and the motor response test from 1 to 6 points.

Thus, the Glasgow Coma Scale is an important criterion for assessing the level of consciousness. Each individual response is scored in points, and the level of consciousness is expressed as the sum of points for each parameter. The lowest score is 3 points, and the highest is 15 points. A score of 8 points or lower is defined as coma.

A score of 3–5 points is prognostically extremely unfavorable, especially when combined with fixed dilated pupils and an absent oculocephalic/oculovestibular reflex.

Appendix G2. SOFA score

Original name: Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA)

Russian name: SOFA scale

Source (official developer website, validation publication): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29443733/

Tee Y.S., Fang H.Y., Kuo I.M., Lin Y.S., Huang S.F., Yu M.C. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score is reliable for predicting mortality in acute severe pancreatitis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb; 97(7):e9654. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009654.

Type (underline):

- rating scale

- index

- questionnaire

Purpose: determination of organ failure

Parameters

Score

0

1

2

3

4

PaO2/FiO2

>400

300-399

200-299

100-199

<100

Platelet count in mL

>150000

100000-149000

50000-99999

20000-49999

<20000

Serum bilirubin

<20

20-32

33-101

102-204

>204

Mean arterial pressure

>70 mmHg

<70 mmHg without vasopressors

Any dose of dobutamine. Dopamine <5 mcg/kg per minute

Dopamine 5–15 mcg/kg per minute. Epinephrine <0.1 mcg/kg per minute. Norepinephrine <0.1 mcg/kg per minute.

Dopamine >15 mcg/kg per minute. Epinephrine >0.1 mcg/kg per minute. Norepinephrine >0.1 mcg/kg per minute.

Glasgow Coma Scale score

15

13-14

10-12

6-9

3-5

Serum creatinine or urine output

Serum creatinine <100 µmol/l

Serum creatinine 100–170 µmol/l

Serum creatinine 171–299 µmol/L

Serum creatinine 300–400 µmol/L. 24-hour urine output 200–499 mL

Serum creatinine >440 µmol/L. 24-hour urine output <200 mL

Key (interpretation):

PaO2 in mmHg. FiO2 from 0.21 to 1.00.

Adrenergic agents used for at least 1 hour. Dosage in µg/kg/min.

0 – optimal parameter, 4 – most abnormal parameter.

Data must be collected and evaluated once daily throughout the patient's stay in the intensive care unit.

Mean arterial pressure (MAP) is calculated by the formula: MAP = (SBP + 2DBP) / 3.

The SOFA index equals the sum of all six parameters.

Scales and calculators from this guideline

SOFAAssessment of multiple organ dysfunction (sepsis, ICU)Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)Assessment of the level of consciousnessDopamine calculatorCalculation of dopamine infusion rate (mcg/kg/min → ml/h) with automaticNorepinephrine calculatorCalculation of norepinephrine infusion rate in ml/h based on dose in mcg/kg/min, weightKDIGO Risk Matrix (GFR and Albuminuria)CKD progression risk category (G + A)Dobutamine calculatorCalculation of dobutamine infusion rate (mcg/kg/min → ml/h) with automatic

If you practice in the specialty of infectious diseases

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer using the clinical guideline for "Hemorrhagic Fever with Renal Syndrome" and other active guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health with links to the section, rather than paraphrasing foreign guidelines. URL: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines