List of Abbreviations
AGS — antiglaucoma surgery
ATP synthase — adenosine triphosphate synthase IOP — intraocular pressure
AMD — age-related macular degeneration
GCS — glucocorticosteroids
YAG — yttrium-aluminum-garnet (laser)
IOL — intraocular lens
ICC — intracapsular cataract extraction
CTR — capsular tension ring
CBR — ciliary block glaucoma
CME — cystoid macular edema
LEC — laser cataract extraction
ICD 10 — International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision
BCVA — best corrected visual acuity
UCVA — uncorrected visual acuity
NSAIDs — nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
OCT — optical coherence tomography
PVI — povidone-iodine
POAG — Primary open-angle glaucoma
PES — pseudoexfoliation syndrome
RSP-3 — collagen copolymer intraocular lens for extracapsular fixation
RF — Russian Federation
TASS — toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS syndrome)
UV rays — ultraviolet rays
Femto-CE — femtosecond-assisted cataract extraction
phaco — phacoemulsification
CE — cataract extraction
ECCE — extracapsular cataract extraction
Terms and Definitions
Viscoelastics are special polymer solutions used to protect the corneal endothelium and maintain anterior chamber volume during anterior segment surgery.
Intracapsular cataract extraction (ICCE) is a surgical method of cataract treatment consisting of the removal of the lens together with the capsular bag.
Laser cataract extraction (LCE) is a method of fragmenting the lens substance inside the capsular bag using laser energy followed by aspiration of the resulting fragments.
Phacoemulsification (phaco) is a surgical method for treating cataracts, which consists of ultrasonic fragmentation of the lens nucleus inside the capsular bag, followed by its aspiration and subsequent implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL).
Femtosecond-assisted phacoemulsification (Femto-phaco) is a two-stage procedure: in the first stage, a femtosecond laser is used to make corneal incisions, perform capsulotomy, and fragment the nucleus; in the second stage, lens matter is evacuated using vacuum, followed by IOL implantation.
Phakic IOL is an IOL implanted into the posterior chamber of the eye in front of the natural lens or fixed to the iris to correct high refractive errors in patients under 40 years of age.
Extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) is a surgical method of cataract treatment consisting of the mechanical removal of the lens nucleus from the capsular bag either entirely or in parts, requiring a large incision (from 6.0 mm wide) and subsequent suture closure.
Optical coherence tomography is a non-invasive imaging method that allows visualization of anterior and posterior segment structures of the eyeball with high resolution (up to 5 µm) and their quantitative measurement.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Age-related cataract is a pathological condition associated with partial or complete opacification of the eye lens, which typically develops in people after the age of 60 and manifests with varying degrees of visual impairment up to complete loss of form vision.
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Risk factors
Numerous risk factors associated with cataract development are presented in Table 1. The most common among them are age, diabetes mellitus, prolonged use of topical, systemic, or inhaled glucocorticosteroids, and previous intraocular surgery.
Table 1. Factors associated with an increased risk of cataract development
Cataract type | Associated risk factors | Type of study | Risk | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Subtypes not specified in studies | Use of acetylsalicylic acid** | Randomized | No evidence of risk of use | |
Observational | Increased risk | |||
Diabetes mellitus | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Use of systemic inhaled corticosteroids | Case-control | Increased risk in patients ≥40 years | ||
Case-control | Increased risk in patients ≥65 years | |||
Case-control | Increased risk in patients ≥70 years | |||
Intranasal use of systemic corticosteroids | Case-control | No increased risk | ||
Ionizing radiation (low and high doses) | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Smoking | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Cortical | Diabetes mellitus | Observational | Increased risk | |
Heredity | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Ionizing radiation (low and high doses) | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Myopia (˃1 diopter) | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Obesity | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Use of systemic corticosteroids | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Exposure to UV-B rays | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Nuclear | Diabetes mellitus | Observational | Increased risk | |
Heredity | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Arterial hypertension | Observational | Increased risk with topical or systemic use of β-blockers | ||
Previous vitrectomy | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Smoking | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Exposure to UV-B rays | Case-control | Increased risk | ||
Posterior subcapsular | Use of systemic inhaled corticosteroids | Population-based cross-sectional study | Increased risk in patients ≥49 years | |
Ionizing radiation (low and high doses) | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Obesity | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Eye injuries | Transverse | Increased risk | ||
Previous vitrectomy | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Retinitis pigmentosa | Case series | Increased risk | ||
Topical use of systemic corticosteroids | Case series | Increased risk | ||
Systemic use of corticosteroids | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Mixed | Previous vitrectomy | Observational | Increased risk | |
Smoking | Observational | Increased risk | ||
Exposure to UV-B rays | Observational | Increased risk |
Most studies on risk factors for cataract development are observational, suggest the presence of associations, but cannot reliably prove cause-and-effect relationships, as they do not investigate cataract progression or exposure to risk factors in a standardized manner.
Pathogenesis. According to a number of authors, changes in the composition of the anterior chamber aqueous humor with the formation of abnormal metabolites lead to the destruction of lens fiber protein. It has also been established that in cataracts, changes occur in the trace element and amino acid composition of the lens, with an accumulation of sodium, calcium, zinc, and water in its tissues, and a decrease in potassium, aluminum, soluble proteins, sulfur-containing amino acids, bound crystallins, ascorbic acid, riboflavin, and cytochrome. The activity of ATP synthase, pyruvate phosphokinase, carbonic anhydrase, etc., decreases. The question of what triggers such changes remains open [1].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
Cataracts are one of the main causes of low vision and reversible blindness in the world, affecting every sixth person over the age of 40 and the vast majority of the population by the 8th decade of life. Given the gradually increasing life expectancy, particularly characteristic of economically developed countries, the number of cataract patients is projected to increase from the current 20 million to 40 million people by 2020. According to published data, the overall prevalence of cataract in the Russian Federation (RF) is 3.36% for the urban population and 3.63% for the rural population. In the only current population-based study in the Russian Federation on the prevalence of visual impairment from cataracts, performed according to the international RAAB (Rapid Assessment of Avoidable Blindness) standard and based on cluster sampling of a randomized cohort (4,044 people per 336,000 population aged over 50 years), visual reduction from cataracts to 0.3 and below occurred in 8.69% of those examined. At the same time, cataracts were diagnosed 2 times more often in women than in men [2].
Currently, in the Russian Federation, the diagnosis of cataract is established in 1,200 people per 100,000 population, which collectively gives a total number of patients with lens opacification equal to approximately 1,750,000. Considering the number of annual cataract extraction surgeries (460,000–480,000), it should be stated that the need for surgical treatment is met by only 1/3 to 1/4. This indicator varies widely among the regions of the Russian Federation, as the fact of greater availability of surgical care for patients living in cities and large settlements, as opposed to rural residents, is obvious [3].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
H25.0 — Senile incipient cataract
H25.1 — Senile nuclear cataract
H25.2 — Senile cataract, morgagnian type
H25.8 — Other senile cataracts
H25.9 — Senile cataract, unspecified
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
5.1. Depending on the localization of opacities in the lens substance [4]:
nuclear cataract;
cortical cataract;
posterior subcapsular cataract;
total (complete) cataract.
5.2. By the degree of maturity [4]:
incipient cataract;
immature cataract;
mature cataract;
hypermature cataract.
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
During a slit-lamp examination with a wide pupil, incipient cataract reveals subcapsular vacuoles and splitting of lens fibers. Immature cataract is characterized by a white-gray, yellow, or brown nucleus, and cortical opacities in the form of spokes may also be present. Mature cataract presents with total opacification of the lens, with a white nucleus and cortical masses. In hypermature cataract, the cortical substance turns into a liquefied milky-white mass that gradually resorbs, and the dense nucleus sinks downwards.
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
When examining a patient with senile cataract, a thorough history taking and assessment of complaints are recommended to evaluate the timing and rate of vision loss, as well as general health status [5, 6].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: blurred vision followed by its gradual decline are characteristic symptoms of lens opacification, although similar complaints may also occur in other eye pathologies. The impact of cataract on visual functions can be subjectively assessed based on the patient's description of their functional capabilities and vision problems. Over time, patients adapt to low vision and may not notice the gradual decline in visual functions and cataract progression. Anamnestic data collection includes assessing the timing and rate of visual function impairment, the patient's subjective description of their visual and functional capabilities, general health status, medications taken, and other risk factors that may affect the course and outcome of surgery (immunodeficiency states, systemic use of alpha-1 adrenergic receptor antagonists, diabetes mellitus, allergies, etc.).
During the initial examination of a patient with cataract, it is necessary to:
determine the etiology of the process taking into account concomitant risk factors;
identify concomitant and systemic diseases that can lead to vision loss or affect the progression of the disease, the course of surgical intervention, the postoperative period, or the final treatment outcome; determine indications and contraindications for surgery; establish optimal treatment tactics;
evaluate the prognosis of visual function recovery in the postoperative period.
2.2 Physical Examination
It is recommended to assess the psychophysical state of a patient with senile cataract in terms of their adequate self-assessment of their condition, the causes of vision loss, and treatment prospects [6, 7].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended for all patients with senile cataract to determine retinal visual acuity with current distance correction for an in-depth assessment of visual functions [6, 7].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: the optical correction power must be recorded in the medical documentation; near vision testing is performed when indicated.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
Specific laboratory diagnostics for age-related cataract are not used.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
It is recommended for all patients with senile cataract to undergo visometry with determination of the best corrected visual acuity for an objective assessment of visual functions [6, 7].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended for all patients with senile cataract to undergo ophthalmotonometry (measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) with a pneumatic or applanation tonometer) to assess baseline intraocular pressure [6, 7].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended for all patients with senile cataract to undergo biomicroscopy – external examination using a slit lamp to assess the condition of the eye [6, 7].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: includes examination of the eyelids, eyelashes, lacrimal drainage system, orbit, position of the eyeballs, and assessment of their mobility.
It is recommended for all patients with senile cataract to undergo biomicroscopy of the anterior segment of the eye using a slit lamp under conditions of miosis and mydriasis to assess the condition of the eye [121, 122].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended for all patients with senile cataract to undergo fundus ophthalmoscopy under mydriasis to clarify the localization of lens opacity foci, their prevalence and degree, to study the state of the vitreous body, optic nerve disc, central and peripheral parts of the retina in order to assess the condition of the eye [122, 123].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended for all patients with senile cataract to undergo eye biometry (optical or ultrasound) for intraocular lens (IOL) calculation and assessment of the eye condition [6, 7, 9, 124].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: the main technique is optical biometry, which can be based on laser optical interferometry or optical low-coherence reflectometry
using a superluminescent diode. Both are comparable in accuracy [8]. The ultrasound biometry method has a higher margin of error and becomes necessary when the optical method cannot be used (mature cataract, dense opacities of the posterior lens capsule).
It is recommended for all patients with senile cataract to undergo keratometry (ophthalmometry) for intraocular lens calculation and assessment of the eye condition [6, 7].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: manual and automated keratometers, autorefractometers and keratometers built into optical biometers are used for keratometry. In controversial cases, to clarify the type, axes, and degree of corneal astigmatism, keratotopography (based on the Placido disc principle), keratotomography (based on Scheimpflug photography of the anterior segment of the eyeball), or optical coherence tomography of the cornea is used
2.5 Other Procedures
It is recommended to perform an additional preoperative examination to identify concomitant pathology and predict the clinical outcome (electrophysiological studies of the retina and optic nerve state, specular (endothelial) microscopy, central corneal thickness measurement, optical coherence tomography of the retina (OCT), ultrasound B-scan) [6, 12-13].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
In most patients, the ophthalmologist can determine the contribution of the cataract to the decline in visual functions by comparing biomicroscopy results with the patient's specific symptoms.
Sometimes the patient's visual symptoms are disproportionate to the severity of the cataract. Determining visual acuity alone does not allow for a quantitative assessment of a number of visual symptoms, such as, in particular, reduced resistance to glare and loss of contrast sensitivity. Examinations in a dark room with high contrast and a brightly lit object can significantly underestimate the functional problems experienced by a patient under conditions of varying illumination and contrast.
Wavefront analysis has shown that even minor cataracts can cause a significant increase in optical aberrations. Normally, the natural negative spherical aberrations of the lens are counterbalanced by the natural positive spherical aberrations of the cornea. In cataracts, the lens aberrations turn positive, and the established balance is disrupted, leading to a decrease in contrast sensitivity. In some cases, this explains the pronounced complaints of certain patients with mild lens opacities and relatively high best-corrected visual acuity [6].
It is recommended for patients with suspected optic nerve diseases to perform electrophysiological studies of the retina and optic nerve (determination of electrical lability thresholds, electrical sensitivity thresholds, electroretinography, and registration of visual evoked potentials) to assess the state of the eye, treatment tactics, and visual function prognosis before and after surgery [6].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended for patients with corneal diseases to perform specular (endothelial) microscopy and central corneal thickness measurement to assess the state of the eye, treatment tactics, and visual function prognosis before and after surgery [10].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: these studies are prescribed for patients with corneal pathology to determine the risk of posterior endothelial decompensation and corneal opacity, as well as following eye trauma or previous surgeries.
It is recommended for patients with retinal diseases to perform OCT to assess the state of the eye, treatment tactics, and visual function prognosis after surgery [12, 13].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comment: these studies are performed in patients with concomitant retinal pathology (age-related macular degeneration (AMD), epiretinal fibrosis, high myopia, glaucoma, etc.) to determine the risk of progression of this pathology and its impact on postoperative visual functions.
Ultrasound B-scanning is recommended for all patients in cases where a dense (mature) cataract prevents visualization of the posterior segment of the eye [6-8].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
Conservative treatment
Conservative treatment of senile cataract is ineffective. To date, there are no known medications that can cure cataract or slow down its progression.
It is recommended to counsel patients with senile cataract regarding the progressive symptoms of the disease, the causes of visual function decline, and, if necessary (progressive myopization), to prescribe spectacle correction [4, 6, 15].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Surgical treatment
It is recommended for all patients diagnosed with senile cataract to undergo removal of the opacified lens with IOL implantation as the only effective and radical method of treating cataract in the absence of contraindications [4, 6, 14, 16].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: among the variety of surgical operations, ultrasound phacoemulsification (PE) has become the most widespread at the present stage.
It is recommended for the surgeon to decide on the advisability of surgical treatment of cataract based on the magnitude of visual functions [6].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: it should be stated that there are no universal and generally accepted research methods that allow linking the state of visual functions with the patient's quality of life, impairment of their working capacity, and ability to perform routine household activities.
Surgical treatment of cataract is recommended for patients with decreased visual functions leading to a limitation of working capacity, which no longer satisfies their needs for visual acuity and the absence of side visual phenomena and creates discomfort in everyday life [17, 18].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: in modern conditions, when patients make high demands on the quality of life and do not accept the need for functional limitations associated with decreased vision, there are grounded prerequisites for expanding indications and earlier cataract surgery. The current stage of development of surgical technologies justifies the feasibility of introducing into clinical practice a conditional threshold equal to the loss of central vision to the level of 0.5 with correction.
Indications for surgical treatment of cataract are:
decreased visual acuity;
clinically significant anisometropia associated with cataract; lens opacities that complicate the diagnosis and/or treatment of posterior segment diseases of the eye;
ophthalmotonus disorders associated with the development of cataract (phacomorphic, phacolytic, phacoanaphylactic, phacotopic glaucomas);
Relative contraindications to surgical intervention for cataract are:
level of corrected visual acuity in the affected eye that meets the patient's needs;
presence of comorbid psychosomatic pathology in the patient that does not guarantee safe surgical intervention;
lack of conditions for adequate postoperative care of the patient and administration of appropriate postoperative treatment.
Absolute contraindications to surgical intervention for cataract can be considered situations when the surgeon does not expect an improvement in visual functions as a result of the operation and at the same time there are no other medical indications for cataract removal (phacogenic pathology).
It should be emphasized that in real-world clinical practice, every patient requires an individualized approach. The attending physician (surgeon) must make the final decision on the appropriateness and adequacy of choosing surgical treatment, taking into account all aspects of the patient's local and systemic status.
Preoperative medical examination
Surgeon's responsibilities:
obtain informed consent signed by the patient or an authorized representative;
ensure the necessary scope of the patient's preoperative examination (see the "Ophthalmological Examination" section); make sure that the medical documentation accurately reflects the symptoms, clinical features, and indications for treatment;
conduct a discussion and explain the risks, benefits, expected outcomes of surgical treatment, including the expected refractive outcome and surgical experience;
discuss the results of the preoperative examination with the patient or an authorized representative;
determine the scope of surgical intervention and select an appropriate IOL;
determine and discuss with the patient or an authorized representative the postoperative management strategy (drug regimen, care specifics, caregivers);
answer the patient's questions about the upcoming surgery and the postoperative period, including necessary expenses.
For all patients to replace an opacified lens or correct ametropia while maintaining the ligamentous apparatus of the lens and the capsular bag, extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) is recommended. The preferred and most widespread variant of ECCE is phacoemulsification (PE) [18]. To prevent infectious complications, the use of antibacterial drugs and/or antimicrobial drugs before surgical intervention is possible (in the absence of medical contraindications). All patients need therapy with medicinal products: anticholinergic agents and/or sympathomimetic groups (excluding antiglaucoma drugs) for 1 hour before surgical intervention (in the absence of medical contraindications).
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Literature data favor the use of povidone-iodine** (PVI) as the main proven preoperative intervention to reduce the incidence of postoperative endophthalmitis [25]
Local application of povidone-iodine** (PVI) during cataract surgery is recommended for all patients. A mandatory step, the purpose of which is to reduce the number of bacteria in the wound area, consists in applying 5–10% povidone-iodine** to the cornea, conjunctival sac, and skin around the eye at least 3 minutes before the start of the operation. [25, 129] In cases where the use of povidone-iodine** is contraindicated (true allergy is rare, and hyperthyroidism is only a relative contraindication to this type of single application), a 0.05% aqueous solution of chlorhexidine** can be used [25]
Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)
Comments: The results of a prospective randomized study showed the advantages of combined antibiotic prophylaxis using povidone-iodine** (PVI) in combination with 0.5% #levofloxacin** solution compared to the use of PVI alone [105]. According to another prospective randomized study, 1-day local administration of 0.5% #moxifloxacin solution, 1 drop in the affected eye 4 times a day.**, had the same efficacy in reducing the number of bacteria on the conjunctiva in the perioperative period compared to its 3-day local administration [106].
Local administration of third- and fourth-generation fluoroquinolone solutions (0.5% #levofloxacin, 1 drop 4 times a day, or 0.5% #moxifloxacin, 1 drop 3 times a day) 1 day before surgery in combination with 5–10% povidone-iodine** is recommended as a form of postoperative endophthalmitis (POE) prophylaxis [105, 106]
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
For cataracts of dense consistency, the use of the laser cataract extraction method is recommended [19].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: in a randomized study of ECCE and PE through a small surgical incision, the advantages of the latter were revealed in terms of fewer surgical operations and statistically significantly better visual acuity; a low incidence of secondary cataract development during the 1st year of observation was also established.
Femtosecond-assisted PE to replace an opacified lens or correct ametropia in patients with senile cataract surgery is recommended to be performed in cases (with low density of corneal endothelial cells, weakness or local failure of the lens ligamentous apparatus) to reduce the risk of complications [20].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: Femtosecond-assisted phacoemulsification – an alternative approach to extracapsular cataract surgery [20]. A femtosecond laser is used to perform corneal incisions (main, paracenteses), anterior capsulotomy, and pre-fragmentation of the lens nucleus [22]. To date, there are no randomized trials that convincingly substantiate the advantages
of femtosecond-assisted ECCE in age-related cataract surgery, however, there are data on the feasibility of using femtosecond assistance in complicated cases [20-22].
Femtosecond-assisted PE is recommended to be used to replace an opacified lens in complicated cataract surgery situations, with weakness of Zinn's zonules and/or a high risk of corneal endothelium decompensation [23].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Implantation of polymeric ophthalmic intracapsular rings for straightening the lens bag and tensioning its capsule in 1st–2nd degree lens subluxation for an even load distribution on the lens ligamentous apparatus is recommended for patients undergoing senile cataract surgery [24].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
At the end of the operation in patients undergoing senile cataract surgery, instillation and injection of antibacterial drugs and topical glucocorticosteroids are recommended for the prevention of acute endophthalmitis and the development of non-specific inflammation [25; 27].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: intracameral administration of an antibacterial drug solution immediately upon completion of cataract extraction makes it possible to significantly (5–7 times) reduce the likelihood of acute postoperative endophthalmitis [25]. In the postoperative period of uncomplicated cataract surgery, drug treatment is prescribed in the form of instillations of antibacterial drugs (up to 14 days), topical glucocorticosteroids (up to 30 days), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (up to 30 days post-op).
Comments: The results of a multicenter study conducted by the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of POE for cefuroxime** [111]. The literature describes the efficacy of intracameral administration of moxifloxacin** in separate series of observations [112, 113]. The results of a meta-analysis by Kessel, Line et al. [114] showed a significant reduction in the risks of POE with the intracameral use of cefazolin**, cefuroxime**, and moxifloxacin** solutions compared to placebo. The benefit of routine antibiotic prophylaxis of endophthalmitis with intracameral use of vancomycin** has not been proven.
In patients undergoing senile cataract surgery, in the absence of contraindications, intracameral administration of 1st and 2nd generation cephalosporin solutions (#cefazolin**, #cefuroxime**), and in patients with intolerance to beta-lactam antibacterial drugs (penicillins) or in the presence of known risk factors for infection with multiresistant pathogens (in particular, methicillin-resistant S. epidermidis) — 4th generation fluoroquinolone solutions (#moxifloxacin**) or glycopeptide (#vancomycin**) immediately upon completion of cataract extraction is recommended as an additional form of POE prophylaxis [25, 117].
IOL implantation is recommended as a method of aphakia correction in the absence of contraindications for all patients [6, 28].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Implantation of a posterior chamber IOL into the capsular bag is recommended for all patients for aphakia correction, as it is the most optimal method of intraocular correction [6].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: fixation of the IOL outside the capsular bag may be required in case of zonular weakness or compromise of the integrity of the anterior and/or posterior lens capsule during surgery. Options may include implantation of an anterior chamber IOL with fixation of the lens haptics in the anterior chamber angle or to the iris, as well as posterior chamber IOL implantation with ciliary sulcus fixation [28-35]. Suture fixation of a posterior chamber IOL to the iris or transsclerally is necessary in the absence of adequate capsular support [28-35].
For the correction of aphakia in grade 3-4 lens subluxation, it is recommended to implant a pupillary IOL or a three-piece IOL with iris suturing or scleral fixation [28-35].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
For mechanical pupil dilation, it is recommended to use a disposable sterile polymeric iris-capsular retractor or a disposable sterile polymeric quadrilateral iris retractor during cataract surgery with a small pupil [1, 35].
GCR CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)
Cataract and glaucoma combination
To reduce postoperative complications, it is recommended to perform cataract surgery with IOL implantation (without concomitant glaucoma surgery) in primary angle-closure glaucoma of early or moderate stages, provided the intraocular pressure (IOP) is compensated by hypotensive medications [36, 37].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: cataract surgery with IOL implantation can contribute to a moderate reduction in IOP postoperatively [36, 37].
To prevent reactive hypertension after phacoemulsification in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), it is recommended to use hypotensive therapy in the pre- and postoperative periods [103-104].
GCR CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence - 4)
To normalize IOP and replace the opaque lens, combined simultaneous cataract and glaucoma surgery is r
e commended if IOP is not compensated on a maximum hypotensive regimen [36-40].
GCR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3)
Comments: Phacoemulsification combined with glaucoma surgery can contribute to both IOP normalization and improvement of the best corrected visual acuity [36-40]. The advantage of combined surgery includes the prevention of a sharp reactive IOP spike in the early postoperative period and a sustained hypotensive effect achieved through a single intervention [36-40].
To mitigate the negative impact of high intraoperative IOP (during phacoemulsification), it is recommended to use the most optimal and safe values set and controlled by the equipment (using ophthalmic surgical systems). The target IOP may be considered close to physiological levels. The surgeon must independently assess the feasibility and safety of intraoperative application of such pressure, including based on technical specifications of the systems used [94-96].
Level of Recommendation BLevel of Evidence 4Level of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence - 4)
It is recommended to use traditional visualization systems using an operating ophthalmic microscope (acceptable in combination with digital visualization systems that provide a real-time stereoscopic image of the surgical field, as well as with an integrated optical coherence tomography system to expand the capabilities of intraoperative surgical strategy adjustment in complicated cases) [97-102].
LeveL of Recommendation BGrade of Evidence 3LeveL of Recommendation B (Grade of Evidence - 3)
Pain Management
It is recommended to use acetazolamide**, pterygopalatine block as preoperative preparation, and, if necessary, advanced anesthetic management in the form of general anesthesia for phacotopical glaucoma presenting with high IOP despite maximum hypotensive therapy [26, 130, 131, 132].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Dietary therapy
Not applicable.
Optics and refraction
For the correction of aphakia and reduction of spherical aberrations, it is recommended that patients receive monofocal aspheric IOLs [41-48].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: spherical IOLs are characterized by positive spherical aberrations because rays passing through the edge of the lens are focused proximally relative to paraxial rays. The design of aspheric IOLs helps reduce or eliminate ocular spherical aberrations. Clinical studies show a pupil size-dependent reduction in ocular spherical aberrations with aspheric IOL implantation. Several studies demonstrate improved contrast sensitivity parameters when using aspheric IOLs compared to spherical ones [41-48].
Toric IOLs for aphakia correction are recommended for patients with corneal astigmatism of 1.25 D or more [49-53].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: keratometry in cataract patients has shown that 25.9% of cases have astigmatism greater than 1.25 D [54]. It has also been found that toric IOLs reduce spectacle dependence compared to standard spherical or aspheric monofocal IOLs [49-53]. Multifocal toric IOLs are indicated for corneal astigmatism starting from 1.0 D.
For patients without concomitant ocular pathology (AMD, glaucoma, diabetes mellitus, corneal pathology, amblyopia, etc.) who express a desire to be free from spectacle correction for reading and close work, it is recommended to consider the implantation of multifocal IOLs or extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs [55-57, 87-88].
GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 1)
Comments: the multifocality effect of IOL optics is achieved by splitting light rays into two or more foci. A meta-analysis of literature data demonstrates the superiority of multifocal IOLs over monofocal ones in providing near vision without additional spectacle correction while maintaining identical distance visual acuity. However, the use of multifocal IOLs is more frequently accompanied by optical phenomena such as glare, increased dazzle, and the formation of light rings around a light source (halo effect) [55-57]. High uncorrected near visual acuity is an important motivating factor in favor of choosing multifocal IOLs in the absence of occupational (drivers, visually demanding work) or medical (concomitant eye pathology) contraindications. Proper patient selection and detailed counseling are particularly important when using multifocal IOLs.
It is recommended that the physician use the new generation of IOL power calculation formulas during IOL selection to accurately hit the target refraction [58-65].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
To calculate the optical power of IOLs (including toric, multifocal, multifocal toric, and EDOF IOLs), diagnostic and analytical (including navigation) systems incorporating next-generation calculation formulas are recommended for all patients with senile cataracts during pre- and intraoperative ocular assessment [89-93].
GRC BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)
Comments: the use of new-generation IOL calculation formulas combined with modern high-tech diagnostic, analytical, and navigation systems and/or software allows for the comparison of preoperative planning data and real-time intraoperative digital control during IOL positioning, which contributes to achieving target refractive outcomes.
Posterior capsule opacification
Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy is recommended for posterior capsule opacification to improve visual acuity [70].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: the time frame for the development of secondary cataract from the moment of cataract extraction varies [69-73]. The frequency of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy also varies, ranging from 3 to 53% over 3 years [73]. According to the Cataract PORT (Cataract Patient Outcomes Research Team) study, the incidence of secondary cataract development during the first 4 months after surgery was 19.2%. Newer, well-designed case series studies have shown that over 3-5 years, when using silicone or hydrophobic acrylic IOLs with sharp optic edges, posterior capsulotomy was required in 0-4.7% of cases [69-73]. An effective surgical method to eliminate posterior capsule opacification, promoting the restoration of visual functions and improvement of contrast sensitivity, is Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy. The indication for this procedure is the presence of posterior capsule opacification that causes a decrease in visual acuity to a level that fails to meet the patient's functional needs or impairs fundus visualization.
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
It is recommended that all patients be fitted with optical correction devices (glasses, contact lenses) for distance or near vision if necessary [74]. The timing of optical correction is determined individually, usually 3-4 weeks after surgery.
Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
In the absence of complications, the frequency and schedule of subsequent postoperative follow-up examinations depend on the dynamics of clinical recovery. Normally, this is on the 1st, 7th, and 30th days after surgery. More frequent examinations are recommended for all patients who experience an atypical postoperative course, as well as in the event of complications [6, 7, 75–78]. To determine patients' subjective satisfaction with the treatment outcomes, various assessment tools can be used [79, 80].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
At each postoperative follow-up, all patients are recommended to undergo a specific scope of procedures to assess the condition of the eye:
taking an interim medical history (medications used, presence of new symptoms, and the patient's assessment of their vision);
determining visual functions (visual acuity testing, including testing with a pinhole and refractometry as clinically indicated);
measurement of IOP;
biomicroscopy of the eye;
counseling and instruction of the patient or accompanying person;
determining further management tactics [6, 7].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: fundus examination under pharmacological mydriasis is indicated if there is reasonable suspicion or a high risk of fundus pathology. In cases where there is an insufficient improvement in visual functions compared to what was expected, additional diagnostic measures are necessary to identify the cause.
It is recommended that all patients wear sunglasses with UV filters and wide-brimmed hats to prevent cataract development, especially in regions characterized by high insolation [81, 82].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: preventive options for cataract development, as well as its drug therapy, remain unproven. Most studies have not revealed a reliable reversal of the cataractogenesis process as a result of oral multivitamin and mineral supplements. The results of some studies indicate a correlation between smoking and lens nuclear sclerosis and suggest a dose-dependent effect. Cumulative exposure to ultraviolet radiation over long periods of an individual's life may also be associated with lens opacification.
All patients are recommended to quit smoking and achieve glycemic control in diabetes mellitus to prevent cataract development [84].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
All patients are recommended to avoid long-term systemic corticosteroid therapy to prevent cataract development [83].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
Comments: patients on long-term oral and inhaled corticosteroids should be informed about the increased risk of cataract development and may wish to discuss alternative treatment methods with their primary care physician.
6. Organization of Medical Care
Outpatient clinic physician: primary examination, disease detection, diagnosis formulation, referral to an inpatient, day care, or outpatient surgery setting to provide specialized (including high-tech) medical care.
At the medical organization: examination by an ophthalmic surgeon, history taking, diagnostics, IOL power calculation, medical documentation preparation, hospitalization or outpatient surgery if the fellow eye has high visual functions and the patient is sufficiently mobile, provided surgical indications are met.
Performance of surgical intervention in outpatient or inpatient settings, postoperative diagnostics, examination by the attending physician.
The predominant approach is the implementation of replacement forms of specialized medical care for patients with senile cataracts, which allows for a greater volume of surgical treatment, more rational use of the material and technical resources of the medical institution, and healthcare financial resources [119, 120].
The criteria for selecting patients for outpatient phacoemulsification of cataracts are the presence of age-related cataract without concomitant eye pathologies, such as extensive corneal opacity, grade 3-4 lens subluxation, or a small pupil diameter of less than 4 mm (under maximum pharmacological mydriasis). Patients must be sufficiently mobile, able to move independently, and able to attend postoperative follow-up visits [118, 119].
Patients are required to attend a postoperative follow-up visit the next day. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuity is checked, and biomicroscopy is performed. In the postoperative period, patients are prescribed local antibacterial and anti-inflammatory therapy in the form of eye drops (latest-generation fluoroquinolones + glucocorticosteroids), and tear substitutes or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy if necessary.
Discharge for outpatient follow-up in a satisfactory condition with no need for inpatient care: follow-up visits scheduled, discharge summary and recommendations provided, sick leave certificate issued.
7. Additional Information
It is recommended to postpone surgery in post-myocardial infarction patients for at least 9 months after an acute cardiac event to prevent cardiovascular complications. The use of drugs affecting the rheological properties of blood is discontinued 3 days prior and resumed on the second day after cataract surgery [126].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Cataract surgery after an acute cerebrovascular accident is recommended no earlier than 9–12 months to prevent general somatic complications and after obtaining clearance from a neurologist. At the same time, postoperative functional outcomes may be reduced due to damage to the central visual pathway [126, 127].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
In patients after pacemaker implantation, it is recommended to exclude all types of diathermy and radiofrequency coagulation, including Klotz radiofrequency capsulorhexis, to prevent cardiovascular complications. Opening of the anterior lens capsule should be performed manually using forceps technique. If capillary hemostasis is required, a non-contact Nd:YAG laser method, medical treatment, or thermal application with a metal instrument heated over an alcohol lamp flame can be used [126].
Cataract surgery does not require a specific type of diet. Patients without severe comorbid somatic conditions are recommended Diet No. 15; in mild-to-moderate diabetes mellitus, Diet No. 9 is recommended. In other situations, as prescribed by a general practitioner [128].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ No. | Quality criteria for the provision of medical care | Level of Evidence | Level of recommendation certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | Visometry with visual acuity correction determination performed | C | 4 |
2 | Ocular biomicroscopy performed | C | 4 |
3 | Fundus ophthalmoscopy was performed | C | 4 |
4 | Intraocular lens power calculation was performed | B | 3 |
5 | Prevention of infectious complications was performed using antibacterial drugs (ATC: G01AA) and/or antimicrobial drugs (ATC: S01A) prior to surgery (in the absence of medical contraindications) | C | 5 |
6 | Drug therapy was administered: anticholinergic agents (ATC: S01FA) (within 1 hour before surgery, in the absence of medical contraindications) | C | 5 |
7 | Phacoemulsification, extracapsular cataract extraction, or intracapsular cataract extraction was performed (depending on medical indications and in the absence of medical contraindications) | B | 4 |
8 | Antibacterial therapy and/or drug therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or glucocorticosteroids was administered (depending on medical indications and in the absence of medical contraindications) | C | 5 |
9 | Stabilization or improvement of best-corrected visual acuity was achieved at the time of discharge from the hospital | C | 5 |
10 | Pseudophakia of the eye at the time of discharge from the hospital | C | 4 |
References
Show references
Liu Y-C, Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B, Mehta J.S Cataracts The Lancet. 2017;390(10094): 600-612. doi:10.1016/S0140- 6736(17)30544-5
Branchevsky S.L., Malyugin B.E. Prevalence of visual impairment due to cataract according to the RAAB study in Samara. Ophthalmic Surgery. 2013;3: 82–85.
Federal clinical guidelines for the provision of ophthalmological care to patients with age-related cataract. Expert Council on the Problem of Surgical Treatment of Cataract. Moscow: Oftal'mologiya Publishing House; 2015: 9–18.
Yartseva N.S., Deyev L.A., Shilkin G.A. Selected lectures in ophthalmology in three volumes. Volume II. Study guide for the postgraduate professional education system for physicians. Lecture 13. Moscow; 2008.
Brian G, Taylor H. Cataract blindness – challenges for the 21 century. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2001;79: 249– 256.
Harris JK, Mizuiri D, Ambrus A, Lum FC., Garratt S. Cataract in the Adult Eye Preferred Practice Pattern 2016.
https://www.aao.org/preferred-practice-pattern/cataract-in-adult- eye-ppp-2016
Takhchidi H.P., Egorova E.V., Tolchinskaya A.I. Intraocular correction in the surgery of complicated cataracts. Moscow: Novoye v meditsine Publishing House; 2004.
Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Sacu S et al. Influence of operator experience on the performance of ultrasound biometry compared to optical biometry before cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29: 1950–5.
Pershin K.B., Pashinova N.F., Tsygankov A.Yu., Legkikh S.L., Likh I.A. Biometry in IOL optical power calculation as a factor of successful cataract surgery. Cataract and Refractive Surgery. 2016;16(2): 15–22.
Weiss JS, Møller HU, Aldave AJ, Seitz B, Bredrup C, Kivelä T, Munier FL, Rapuano CJ, Nischal KK, Kim EK, Sutphin J, Busin M, Labbé A, Kenyon KR, Kinoshita S, Lisch W. IC3D classification of corneal dystrophies--edition 2. Cornea. 2015;34(2): 117-59.
Traish AS, Colby KA. Approaching cataract surgery in patients with fuchs" endothelial dystrophy. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2010;50: 1–11.
Safran SG. How spectral-domain OCT has changed my practice. Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today 2010. Available at: http://bmctoday.net/crstoday/pdfs/crst0310_cs_safran.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2016.
Safran SG. SD-OCT: a quantam leap for anterior segment surgeons. Current Insight. San Francisco, CA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2009. Available at: www.aao.org/current- insight/sdoct-quantum-leap-anterior-segment-surgeons. Accessed May 27, 2016.
Lundstrom M, Fregell G, Sjoblom A. Vision related daily life problems in patients waiting for a cataract extraction. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1994;78: 608–611.
Lee PP, Spritzer K, Hays RD. The impact of blurred vision on functioning and well-being. Ophthalmology. 1997;104: 390–396.
Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100: 1043–9.
Malyugin B.E. Cataract surgery and intraocular correction at the present stage of ophthalmic surgery development. The Russian Annals of Ophthalmology. 2014;130(6): 80–88.
Jorge L Alio. Cataract Surgery: From Today"s Standards to Future Progress. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017 Jul-Aug;6(4):309. doi:10.22608/APO.2017184.
Kopaeva V.G., Andreev Yu.V. Laser cataract extraction. Moscow: Oftal'mologiya Publishing House; 2011: 262.
Manning S, Barry P, Ype H, Rosen P, Stenevi U, Young D, Lundstrom M, Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard phacoemulsification cataractsurgery: Study from the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42: 1779–1790.
Nagy Z, Takacs A, Filkorn T, Sarayba M. Initial clinical evaluation of an intraocular femtosecond laser in cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2009;25: 1053–60.
Crema AS, Walsh A, Yamane IS, Ventura BV & Santhiago MR. (2015). Femtosecond Laser-assisted Cataract Surgery in Patients With Marfan Syndrome and Subluxated Lens. Journal of Refractive Surgery, 31(5), 338–341. doi:10.3928/1081597x-20150424-02
Anisimova N.S., Malyugin B.E., Sobolev N.P. Femtosecond laser assistance in intumescent cataract surgery. (https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=27346476)Modern
technologies in ophthalmology. 2016; (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34333736)5:11–13. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Ioshin I.E., Bagrov S.N., Maklakova I.A., Egorova E.V., Tolchinskaya A.I., Latypov I.A., Vigovsky A.V., Petrenko A.E., Lysenko S.V. Intracapsular ring: prevention of complications in cataract extraction with lens subluxation. Ophthalmic Surgery. 2002;1: 25–28. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Barry P, Cordovés L, Gardner S. ESCRS Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Endophthalmitis Following Cataract Surgery: Data, Dilemmas and Conclusions. Published by ESCRS. Dublin, 2013: 45. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Malyugin B.E., Shpak A.A., Morozova T.A. Kataraktalʹnaya khirurgiya: kliniko-farmakologicheskie podkhody [Cataract surgery: clinical and pharmacological approaches]. Moscow: Ophthalmology Publishing House; 2015: 82. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Malyugin B.E., Pashtayev N.P., Pozdeyeva N.A., Fadeyeva T.V. Evaluation of the efficacy of anti-inflammatory therapy after phacoemulsification in patients with age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmic Surgery [Oftal'mokhirurgiya]. 2010;1: 39–44. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Chang DF, Masket S, Miller KM et al. ASCRS Cataract Clinical Committee. Complications of sulcus placement of single-piece acrylic intraocular lenses: recommendations for backup IOL implantation following posterior capsule rupture. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35: 1445–58. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Wagoner MD, Cox TA, Ariyasu RG et al. Intraocular lens implantation in the absence of capsular support: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2003;110: 840–59. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Donaldson KE, Gorscak JJ, Budenz DL et al. Anterior chamber and sutured posterior chamber intraocular lenses in eyes with poor capsular support. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31: 903–9. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Kwong YY, Yuen HK, Lam RF et al. Comparison of outcomes of primary scleral-fixated versus primary anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries. Ophthalmology. 2007;114: 80-5. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Condon GP, Masket S, Kranemann C et al. Small-incision iris fixation of foldable intraocular lenses in the absence of capsule support. Ophthalmology. 2007;114: 1311–8. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Malyugin B.E., Pokrovsky D.F., Semakina A.S. Clinical and functional outcomes of iris-capsular fixation of IOL in cases of lens zonular defects. Ophthalmic Surgery. 2017;1: 10–15. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Kadatskaya N.V., Fokin V.P., Marukhnenko A.M. Comparative analysis of the results of implantation of various IOL models in the correction of aphakia in complicated cases. Bulletin of VolgSMU. 2014;2(50): 54–57. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Malyugin B. Cataract surgery in small pupils. Indian J Ophthalmology. 2017;65(12): 1323–1328. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_800_17 (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34333736&selid=27346476)
Pershin K.B., Pashinova N.F., Tsygankov A.Yu., Solovyova G.M., Batalina L.V. 15-year experience of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34333736&selid=27346476)National Journal of Glaucoma. 2017; 16 (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34486803)2):38–46.(https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34486803&selid=29417961)
Friedman DS, Jampel HD, Lubomski LH et al. Surgical strategies for coexisting glaucoma and cataract: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2002;109: 1902–13. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34486803&selid=29417961)
Wedrich A, Menapace R, Radax U, Papapanos P. Long-term results of combined trabeculectomy and small incision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995;21: 49–54. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34486803&selid=29417961)
Wyse T, Meyer M, Ruderman JM et al. Combined trabeculectomy and phacoemulsification: a one-site vs a two-site approach. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125: 334–9. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34486803&selid=29417961)
Shrivastava A, Singh K. The effect of cataract extraction on intraocular pressure. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21: 118–22. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34486803&selid=29417961)
Bellucci R, Scialdone A, Buratto L et al. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lenses: A multicenter randomized study. J Cataract
Refract Surg. 2005;31: 712–7. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34486803&selid=29417961)
Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Piers PA. Improved functional vision with a modified prolate intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30: 986–92. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34486803&selid=29417961)
Holladay JT, Piers PA, Koranyi G et al. A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes. J Refract Surg. 2002;18: 683–91. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34486803&selid=29417961)
Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Thieme H, Dick HB. Contrast sensitivity after implantation of a spherical versus an aspherical intraocular lens in biaxial microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33: 393–400. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34486803&selid=29417961)
Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Piers PA. Prospective randomized trial of an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2002;18: 692–6. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34486803&selid=29417961)
Kohnen T, Klaproth OK, Buhren J. Effect of intraocular lens asphericity on quality of vision after cataract removal: an intraindividual comparison. Ophthalmology. 2009;116: 1697. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34486803&selid=29417961)
Malyugin B.E., Tereshchenko A.V., Bely Yu.A., Demyanchenko S.K., Fadeeva T.V., Isaev M.A., (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34486803&selid=29417961)Comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy of spherical and aspheric IOL implantation. (https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18903067)Ophthalmic Surgery. 2011; (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822703)3: 27–31. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822703&selid=18903067)
Malyugin B.E., Isaev M.A., Golovin A.V., Albakova Kh.M. Comparative characteristics of visual functions and aberrometry data in patients with spherical, aspheric, and accommodating IOL models. Ophthalmic Surgery. 2012;1: P. 46–53. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822703&selid=18903067)
Grabow H.B. Intraocular correction of refractive errors. In: Kershner
R.M. ed. Refractive Keratotomy for Cataract Surgery and the Correction of Astigmatism. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 1994. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822703&selid=18903067)
Lane SS, Ernest P, Miller KM et al. Comparison of clinical and patient-reported outcomes with bilateral AcrySof toric or spherical
control intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg. 2009;25: 899–901. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822703&selid=18903067)
Ruiz-Mesa R, Carrasco-Sanchez D, Diaz-Alvarez SB et al. Refractive lens exchange with foldable toric intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147: 990–6. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=33822703&selid=18903067)
Gills JP, Gayton JL. Reducing pre-existing astigmatism. In: Gills JP, Fenzl R, Martin RG eds. Cataract Surgery: The State of the Art. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK, 1998. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=33822703&selid=18903067)
Till JS, Yoder PR, Jr, Wilcox TK, Spielman JL. Toric intraocular lens implantation: 100 consecutive cases. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28: 295–301. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=33822703&selid=18903067)
Warren E.Hill. Keratometry database (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=33822703&selid=18903067)https://doctor- ill.com/physicians/docs/Astigmatism.pdf (https://doctor ill.com/physicians/docs/Astigmatism.pdf)
Calladine D, Evans JR, Shah S, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD003169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub3 (https://doctor- ill.com/physicians/docs/Astigmatism.pdf)
Woodward MA, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35: 992–7. (https://doctor- ill.com/physicians/docs/Astigmatism.pdf)
Voronin G.V., Mamikonyan V.R., Sheludchenko V.M., Narbut M.N. Clinical results of aphakia correction with multifocal intraocular lenses. (https://doctor-ill.com/physicians/docs/Astigmatism.pdf)Vestnik Oftal'mologii. 2017;133(1): 37–41. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34463518)
Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018;125: 169–178. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34463518)
Hoffer KJ. Clinical results using the Holladay 2 intraocular lens power formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26: 1233–7. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34463518)
Olsen T, Corydon L, Gimbel H. Intraocular lens power calculation with an improved anterior chamber depth prediction algorithm. JCataract Refract Surg. 1995;21: 313–9. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34463518)
Hoffmann PC, Hutz WW, Eckhardt HB. Significance of optic formula selection for postoperative refraction after cataract operation [in German]. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1997;211: 168–77. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34463518)
Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16: 333–40. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34463518)
Haigis W. Intraocular lens calculation in extreme myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35: 906–11. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=34463518)
Malyugin B.E., Panteleev E.N., Bessarabov A.N., Agafonov S.G., Optimization of the A-constant in IOL power calculation in eyes after radial keratotomy. Modern Technologies in Ophthalmology. 2017; (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34463518)6: 83–85. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34543129&selid=30469504)
Takhchidi Kh.P., Panteleev E.N., Bessarabov A.N. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=34543129&selid=30469504)Formula for calculating the optical power of the MIKOF/ALF IOL based on a parameterized schematic standard pseudophakic eye. (https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=18902807)Ophthalmic Surgery. 2010; (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822688)4: 20–33. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Arzamastsev A.A., Fabrikantov O.L., Zenkova N.A., Belousov N.K. Optimization of formulas for IOL power calculation. Tambov University Reports. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences. 2016;21(1): 208–213. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Ivanov M.N., Shevelev A.Yu. Formula for calculating the optical power of intraocular lenses. Vestnik Oftal'mologii. 2003;119(4): 52–54. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Takhchidi Kh.P., Mukhametshina E.Z. Comparative analysis of the accuracy of IOL power calculation methods SRK/T, HOLLADAY 1, and HOFFER Q with the domestic MIKOF/ALF method. Bulletin of the Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry. 2011;2(17): 77–78. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Schaumberg DA, Dana MR, Christen WG, Glynn RJ. A systematic overview of the incidence of posterior capsule opacification. Ophthalmology. 1998;105: 1213–21. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Baratz KH, Cook BE, Hodge DO. Probability of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy after cataract surgery in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:161–6. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Cataract Management Guideline Panel. Cataract in Adults: Management of Functional Impairment. Clinical Practice Guideline, Number 4. Rockville, MD: USDHHS, AHCPR Publ. No. (PHS) 93- 0542; 1993. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Schein OD, Steinberg EP, Javitt JC et al. Variation in cataract surgery practice and clinical outcomes. Ophthalmology. 1994;101: 1142–52. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Ursell PG. Three-year incidence of Nd:YAG capsulotomy and posterior capsule opacification and its relationship to monofocal acrylic IOL biomaterial: a UK Real World Evidence study. Eye 2018 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0131-2 (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Ilyina S.N., Zavadsky P.Ch. Modern approaches to the surgical treatment of age-related cataract. Journal of GrSMU. 2009;1: 84–91. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Tinley CG, Frost A, Hakin KN et al. Is visual outcome compromised when next day review is omitted after phacoemulsification surgery? A randomised control trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87: 1350–5. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp?id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Alwitry A, Rotchford A, Gardner I. First day review after uncomplicated phacoemulsification: is it necessary? Eur J Ophthalmol 2006;16: 554–9. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Saeed A, Guerin M, Khan I et al. Deferral of first review after uneventful phacoemulsification cataract surgery until 2 weeks: randomized controlled study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33: 1591–6. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Tan JH, Newman DK, Klunker C et al. Phacoemulsification cataract surgery: is routine review necessary on the first post-operative day? Eye 2000;14 (Pt 1): 53–5. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=33822688&selid=18902807)
Jelin E, Wisløff T, Moe MC, Heiberg T. (https://elibrary.ru/contents.asp? id=33822688&selid=18902807)Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) in Norwegianpopulation of patients with neovascular age related macular degeneration compared to a control population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1): 140. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019- 1203-0 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412873)
Owen CG, Rudnicka AR, Smeeth L, Evans JR, Wormald RP, Fletcher AE. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412873)Is the NEI- VFQ-25 a useful tool in identifying visual impairment in an elderly population? BMC Ophthalmol. 2006;6: 24. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16764714)
Taylor HR, West SK, Rosenthal FS, Muñoz B, Newland HS, Abbey H & Emmett EA (1988). Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation on Cataract Formation. New England Journal of Medicine, 319(22): 1429–1433. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16764714)
Rosenthal FS, Bakalian AE. & Taylor HR (1986). The effect of prescription eyewear on ocular exposure to ultraviolet radiation. American Journal of Public Health, 76(10): 1216–1220. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16764714)
Wang JJ, Rochtchina E, Tan AG et al. Use of inhaled and oral corticosteroids and the long-term risk of cataract. Ophthalmology. 2009;116: 652–7. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16764714)
McCarty CA, Nanjan MB, Taylor HR. Attributable risk estimates for cataract to prioritize medical and public health action. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41: 3720–5. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16764714)
Jelin E, Wisløff T, Moe MC, Heiberg T. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16764714)Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25) in a Norwegian population of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration compared to a control population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1): 140. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1203-0
Owen CG, Rudnicka AR, Smeeth L, Evans JR, Wormald RP, Fletcher AE. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31412873)Is the NEI- VFQ-25 a useful tool in identifying visual impairment in an elderly population? BMC Ophthalmol. 2006;6: 24. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16764714)
Thomas Kohnen, Myriam Böhm, Eva Hemkeppler, Sabrina Schönbrunn, Nina DeLorenzo, Kerstin Petermann, Michael Herzog. Eye. 2019; 33: 1556–1563. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0443-x
Pershin K.B. Surgical correction of presbyopia — current capabilities. Rossiyskiy meditsinskiy zhurnal. 2016; 22 (3): 146—152. DOI 10.18821/0869-2106-2016-22-3-146-152
Comparison Between Digital and Manual Marking for Toric Intraocular Lenses. A Randomized Trial Abdel Hamid Elhofi, MD and Hany Ahmed Helaly, MD Medicine. Vol. 94, Num. 38, Sept. – 2015.
Repeatability Data and Agreement of Keratometry With the VERION System Compared to the IOLMaster Gabor Nemeth, MD, PhD; Eszter Szalai, MD, PhD; Ziad Hassan, MD, PhD; Agnes Lipecz, MD; Andras Berta, MD, PhD, DSc; Laszlo Modis, Jr., MD, PhD, DSc Journal of Refractive Surgery. 2015. Vol. 31, No. 5,
Comparison of keratometric measurements obtained by the Verion Image Guided System with optical biometry and auto-keratorefractometer. Leyla Asena. Sirel Gu¨r Gu¨ngor. Ahmet AkmanInt. Ophthalmol (2017) 37:391–399 https://doi.org/10.25276/2312-4911-2018-5-22-24
Shilovskikh O.V., Ulyanov A.N., Kremeshkov M.V., Titarenko E.M. Comparison of refractive outcomes of IOL calculation using 4th generation formulas in previously performed radial keratotomy. Ophthalmology. 2018;15(2S):121-125. https://doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2018-2S-121-125
Pershin K.B., Pashinova N.F., Konovalova M.M. et al. Features of optical power calculation for a new single-piece aspheric diffraction trifocal intraocular lens. Klinicheskaya oftal'mologiya. 2019;19(3):171-174. DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729-2019-19-3-171-174
Takhtaev Yu.V., Kiseleva T.N., Shlyakman R.B. Effect of set intraoperative ophthalmotonus during phacoemulsification on blood flow velocity in the central retinal artery // Oftal'mologicheskie vedomosti. – 2019. – Vol. 12. – No. 4. – P. 5–12. https://doi.org/10.17816/OV17802
Joos KM, Kay MD, Pillunat LE, et al Effect of acute intraocular pressure changes on short posterior ciliary artery haemodynamics. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1999 Jan;83(1):33-8.; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjo.83.1.33
Tereshchenko A.V., Trifanenkova I.G., Okuneva M.V., Oganesyan A.A. Cataract phacoemulsification under reduced intraoperative parameters // Modern Technologies in Ophthalmology. – 2021. - No. 5. - P. 109-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25276/2312-4911-2021-5-106-108
Berquet F, Henry A, Barbe C, Cheny T, Afriat M, Benyelles AK, Bartolomeu D, Arndt C. Comparing Heads-Up Versus Binocular Microscope Visualization Systems in Anterior and Posterior Segment Surgeries: A Retrospective Study. Ophthalmologica. 2020;
Qian Z, Wang H, Fan H, Lin D, Li W. Three-dimensional digital visualization of phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar;67(3):341-343. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1012_18
Ohno H. Utility of Three-Dimensional (3D) Heads-Up Surgery in Cataract and Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgeries. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019;13: 2071-2073
Das S, Kummelil MK, Kharbanda V, Arora V, Nagappa S, Shetty R, Shetty BK. Microscope Integrated Intraoperative Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography for Cataract Surgery: Uses and Applications. Curr Eye Res. 2016 May;41(5):643-52. doi: 10.3109/02713683.2015.1050742
Yadav S, Mukhija R, Pujari A, Tandon R. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography-guided assessment of hydro-dissection procedure during cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;68(8):1647-1648. doi:10.4103/ijo.IJO_2255_19
Amir-Asgari S, Hirnschall N, Findl O. Using continuous intraoperative optical coherence tomography to classify swirling lens fragments during cataract surgery and to predict their impact on corneal endothelial cell damage. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Jul;42(7):1029-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.04.029
Ioshin I.E., Tolchinskaya A.I. Use of prostaglandin analogues before and after cataract phacoemulsification in primary glaucoma. Rossiyskiy oftal'mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2017;10(2):28-35. https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2017-10-2-28-35
Babushkin A.E., Orenburkina O.I., Matyukhina E.N. On the efficacy of maximum hypotensive therapy using fixed combinations in the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma // RMZH. Klinicheskaya oftal'mologiya. 2016. No. 4. P. 181–184.
Miño de Kaspar H, Kreutzer TC, Aguirre-Romo I, Ta CN, Dudichum J, Bayrhof M, Klauss V, Kampik A. A prospective randomized study to determine the efficacy of preoperative topical levofloxacin in reducing conjunctival bacterial flora. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan;145(1):136-142. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.08.031. Epub 2007 Nov 8. PMID: 17996212.
He L, Ta CN, Hu N, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of 1-day and 3-day Application of topical 0.5% moxifloxacin in eliminating preoperative conjunctival bacteria. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2009;25:373-8
Lott, McGregor N et al. Vitreal penetration of oral moxifloxacin in humans. Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) vol. 28,3 (2008): 473-6. doi:10.1097/IAE.0b013e31814fb0ed
The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 14.0, 2024. (http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/)
Forestier F, Salvanet-Bouccara A, Leveques D, Junes P, Rakotondrainy C, Dublanchet A, Jehl F. Ocular penetration kinetics of fosfomycin administered as a one-hour infusion. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1996 Apr-Jun;6(2):137-42. doi: 10.1177/112067219600600207. PMID: 8823585.
Popovic M, Steinort D, Pillai S, Joukhadar C Fosfomycin: an old, new friend? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis (2010) 29:127–142 DOI 10.1007/s10096-009-0833-2
Endophthalmitis Study Group, European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons. Prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: results of the ESCRS multicenter study and identification of risk factors. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007; 33: 978-88
Arbisser LB. Safety of intracameral moxifloxacin for prophylaxis of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Jul;34(7):1114-20., Lane SS, Osher RH, Masket S, Belani S. Evaluation of the safety of prophylactic intracameral moxifloxacin in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008 Sep;34(9):1451-9.
LaHood BR, Andrew NH, Goggin M. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cataract surgery in the setting of penicillin allergy: A decision-making algorithm. Surv Ophthalmol. 2017 Sep-Oct;62(5):659-669. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 22. PMID: 28438590.
Kessel L, Flesner P, Andresen J, Erngaard D, Tendal B, Hjortdal J. Antibiotic prevention of postcataract endophthalmitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93(4):303e17
Yakovlev S.Ya., Zhuravleva M.V., Protsenko D.N. et al. SCAT Program (Antimicrobial Therapy Control Strategy) in inpatient medical care. Guidelines for medical and prophylactic institutions of Moscow. Consilium Medicum. 2017; 19 (7.1. Surgery): 15–51
Brockhaus L, Goldblum D, Eggenschwiler L, Zimmerli S, Marzolini C. Revisiting systemic treatment of bacterial endophthalmitis: a review of intravitreal penetration of systemic antibiotics. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Nov;25(11):1364-1369. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Feb 14. PMID: 30771529.
Arshinoff, Steve A.; Shi, Runjie B. Relative efficacy of intracameral moxifloxacin injection methods. Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery. 49(5):538-542, May 2023. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001151
Nerev V.V., Malyugin B.E., Trubilin V.N., Zhudenkov K.V., Orlova O.M. Clinical and social aspects of cataract treatment in Russia // Kataraktal'naya i refraktsionnaya khirurgiya. – 2016. – Vol. 16, No. 1. – P. 4-14.
Ioshin I.E. Outpatient cataract surgery. – M.: Aprel, 2016. – 95 p.
Kulinsky A.N., Osintsev E.Yu., Andriyanova E.A., Melsitov V.A. Ambulatory surgery – yesterday, today, tomorrow // Summer Medical Internet Forum – 2011. – URL: https://medconfer.com/node/1271.
Irmingard Neuhann, Lukas Neuhann, Thomas Neuhann. Age-related cataract. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2022 Apr;239(4):615-633. doi: 10.1055/a-1758-3451.
Craig W See, Mustafa Iftikhar Fasika A Woreta. Preoperative evaluation for cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;30(1):3-8. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000535.
Abhay R Vasavada, M R Praveen, Urvi D Jani, Sajani K Shah. Preoperative prediction of posterior capsule plaque in eyes with posterior subcapsular cataract. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2006 Sep;54(3):169-72. doi: 10.4103/0301-4738.27067.
Majid Moshirfar, Benjamin Buckner, Yasmyne C Ronquillo, Daniel Hofstedt. Biometry in cataract surgery: a review of the current literature. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan;30(1):9-12. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000536.
Glaucoma surgery: Treatment and Techniques / Eds. Carreti L., Burrato L. Milan: Springer; 2018: 132.
Calvin Sze-un Fong, Paul Mitchell, Elena Rochtchina, Erdahl T Teber, Thomas Hong, Jie Jin Wang. Correction of visual impairment by cataract surgery and improved survival in older persons: the Blue Mountains Eye Study cohort Ophthalmology 2013 Sep;120(9):1720-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.009.
Liang-Kung Chen, Alastair Mitchell Buchan, Shinn-Jang Hwang, Janice Hinkle. Cataract surgery after acute stroke: maybe more than a coincidence. Stroke 2006 Mar;37(3):766-7.doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000204088.04384.74
Changfan Wu, Xiaotong Han, Xixi Yan, Stuart Keel, Xianwen Shang, Lei Zhang. Impact of Diet on the Incidence of Cataract Surgery among Diabetic Patients: Findings from the 45 and Up Study / Current Eye Research – 2019 Apr; 44(4):385-392. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1548024.
Kramer A., Rudolph, P. Efficiency and tolerance of selected antiseptic substances in respect of suitability for use on the eye // Kramer A. and Behrens -Baumann W. (Eds.) Antiseptic Prophylaxis and Therapy in Ocular Infections. S. Karger AG, Basel. – 2002. – P. 117-144.
National Guidelines for Glaucoma for Practitioners. 4th ed., rev. and supp. / Ed. by E.A. Egorov, V.P. Erichev. M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2019: 384.
World Glaucoma Association Consensus Statement: Angle Closure and Angle Closure Glaucoma / Eds. Weinreb R.N., Friedman D.S. The Netherlands: Kluger; 2006: 113.
Oleshchenko I.G., Yuryeva T.N., Zabolotsky D.V. Efficacy of sphenopalatine ganglion block for analgesia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin. 2023;30(2):76-88. https://doi.org/10.25207/1608-6228-2023-30-2-76-88
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Amirov Aidar Nailevich – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology, Kazan State Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Member of the Presidium of the Association of Ophthalmologists, Member of the Presidium of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Astakhov Sergey Yuryevich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology, Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Vice-President of the Association of Ophthalmologists;
Belikova Elena Ivanovna – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor of the Department of Ophthalmology, Academy of Postgraduate Education under the Federal Research and Clinical Centre of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Chief Physician of the "Dr. Belikova Eye Clinic", Member of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Bikbov Mukharram Mukhtaramovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Director of the Ufa Eye Research Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Bashkortostan, Member of the Presidium of the Association of Ophthalmologists, First Deputy Chairman of the Presidium of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Egorova Elena Vladilenovna – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Deputy Director for Medical Work, Novosibirsk Branch of the Academician S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Member of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Kozhukhov Arseny Aleksandrovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Leading Ophthalmic Surgeon of the "SPEKTR" Eye Clinic, Moscow, Member of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Konovalov Mikhail Egorovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Chief Physician of the "Konovalov Ophthalmological Center", Moscow, Member of the Presidium of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Kopaev Sergey Yuryevich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Lens Surgery and Intraocular Correction, Academician S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Member of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Kochmala Oleg Borisovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Chief Physician of the "Iris Eye Clinic", Rostov-on-Don, Member of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Kulikov Aleksey Nikolaevich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology, S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Chief Ophthalmologist of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Member of the Presidium of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Laptev Boris Vladimirovich – Head of the Operating Unit, "Ekaterinburg Center of Eye Microsurgery" CJSC, Member of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Malyugin Boris Eduardovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director General for Research, Academician S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Chairman of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Mamikonyan Vardan Rafaelovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director for Science, Research Institute of Eye Diseases of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Member of the Board of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Pershin Kirill Borisovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Academician of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences, Medical Director of "Excimer" Eye Clinics, Member of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Sobolev Nikolay Petrovich – Candidate of Medical Sciences, Chief Physician of the Academician S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Member of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Takhtaev Yury Viktorovich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Ophthalmology, Academician I.P. Pavlov First St. Petersburg State Medical University, Member of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia;
Trubilin Vladimir Nikolaevich – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Ophthalmology Center of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology, Academy of Postgraduate Education of the Federal Research and Clinical Centre of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency, Member of the Presidium of the Society of Ophthalmologists of Russia, Member of the Presidium of the Association of Ophthalmologists;
Chentsova Ekaterina Valerianovna – Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Acting Head of the Department of Traumatology, Reconstructive Surgery and Ocular Prosthetics, Helmholtz National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Member of the Association of Ophthalmologists.
No conflict of interest.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
The methodology for developing clinical guidelines is based on evidence-based medicine methods. In these clinical guidelines, all information is ranked by the level of certainty of evidence depending on the quantity and quality of studies on the given issue.
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
Ophthalmologists
Residents and postgraduate students in the specialty "Ophthalmology"
Students of higher medical educational institutions
Table 1. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Scale for grading levels of evidence certainty (LEC) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Scale for grading grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of proper quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies have low methodological quality, and their conclusions regarding the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines
The clinical guideline update mechanism provides for their systematic revision—at least once every three years or upon the appearance of new information on the management tactics for patients with a given disease. The decision to update is made by the Russian Ministry of Health based on proposals submitted by medical non-profit professional organizations. The formulated proposals must take into account the results of a comprehensive assessment of drugs and medical devices, as well as the results of clinical approbation.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
These clinical guidelines were developed taking into account the following regulatory legal documents:
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 902n dated November 12, 2012, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to the Adult Population for Diseases of the Eye, Its Adnexa, and Orbit".
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 422n dated October 25, 2012, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Children for Diseases of the Eye, Its Adnexa, and Orbit".
List of systemic antibacterial drugs used for the treatment of acute bacterial postoperative endophthalmitis (ABPE)
Pharmacological group | ATC code | INN | Route of administration | Single dose | Administration frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beta-lactam antibacterial drugs: penicillins | J01DH | #Meropenem** [116] | intravenously as an infusion | from 0.5 g to 2.0 g | 2 to 3 times a day |
Fluoroquinolones | J01MA | #Moxifloxacin** [116] | intravenously as an infusion | 400 mg | Once daily |
orally | 400 mg | Once daily | |||
Other antibacterial drugs | J01XX08 | #Linezolid** [116] | intravenously as an infusion | 600 mg | Twice daily |
orally | 600 mg | Twice daily | |||
J01XX01 | #Fosfomycin** [109, 110] | intravenously as an infusion | 4.0 g | 1 to 4 times a day |
Analysis of factors influencing the bioavailability of antimicrobial drugs into the aqueous humor of the anterior chamber upon systemic administration
INN | Molecular mass | Plasma protein binding | Lipophilicity | Bioavailability in the aqueous humor of the anterior chamber |
|---|---|---|---|---|
#Linezolid** | ++ | + | +++ | +++++ |
#Fosfomycin** | + | + | + | +++++ |
#Meropenem** | ++ | + | + | +++++ |
#Moxifloxacin** | ++ | + | +++ | ++++ |
#Co-trimoxazole** | ++ | ++ | +++++ | ++++ |
#Metronidazole** | ++ | ++ | +++++ | ++++ |
#Chloramphenicol** | ++ | ++ | + | +++ |
#Doxycycline** | ++ | ++++ | +++ | +++ |
#Rifampicin** | +++ | ++++ | ++++ | ++ |
#Cefazolin** | ++ | ++++ | + | - |
#Cefuroxime** | ++ | ++++ | + | - |
#Ceftazidime** | ++ | ++++ | + | - |
#Clindamycin** | ++ | +++++ | +++ | - |
#Amikacin** | ++ | ++ | + | - |
#Gentamicin** | ++ | ++ | + | - |
#Vancomycin** | +++++ | ++++ | + | - |
#Azithromycin** | +++ | +++ | ++++ | - |
#Daptomycin** | +++ | +++++ | ++ | - |
#Colistimethat sodium | ++++ | ++ | ++ | - |
*Information on the pharmacokinetic properties of antimicrobial drugs according to product labeling (instructions for medical use) and electronic resources: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, https://go.drugbank.com, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ | ||||
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms
Senile cataract

Combination of cataract and glaucoma

Appendix C. Patient Information
Patients with lens opacification seek primary care for initial complaints of gradual blurring of vision at a primary healthcare facility independently or are identified during annual health screenings. After the diagnosis of cataract with high visual acuity is established, the patient is scheduled for follow-up observation every 6 months. If visual functions decrease below 0.5 with correction and/or lead to a limitation in working capacity that no longer meets their needs and creates discomfort in daily life, the patient has the right to receive a referral for surgical treatment.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Bp
Russian title: National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire
Original title (if available): The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ 25)
Source (official developer website, validation publication): [85, 86]
Type (underline):
rating scale index questionnaire
other (specify):
Purpose: patient's subjective assessment of visual functions
Assessment tool, content:
Russian version of the NEI-VFQ 25 questionnaire [84, 85]
1. Overall, would you say your health is:
excellent.......................... 1
very good...................2
good..............................3
fair..........................4
poor.................................5
2. At the present time, would you say your vision in both eyes (with glasses or contact lenses, if you use them) is excellent, good, fair, poor, or very poor?
excellent.........................1
good..............................2
fair..........................3
poor.................................4
very poor......................5
completely blind.............6
3. How often do you worry about your eyesight?
never.......................................... 1
rarely............................................... 2
sometimes............................................. 3
often............................................... 4
constantly....................................... 5
4. How much pain or discomfort do you experience in and around your eyes (e.g., burning, itching, or an aching pain)?
none...................... 1
mild................. 2
moderate.......................... 3
severe.............................. 4
very severe.................. 5
5. How difficult is it for you to read ordinary newspaper print? not at all difficult....................................................... 1
a little difficult.......................................................... 2
quite difficult....................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................. 4
stopped doing this due to vision......................... 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested........................... 6
6. How much difficulty do you have doing the work or other everyday activities you would like to do because of your vision?
good near vision: cooking, sewing, minor home repairs, or using hand tools?
not at all difficult....................................................... 1
a little difficult.......................................................... 2
quite difficult....................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................. 4
stopped doing this because of eyesight....................... 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested............................. 6
7. Because of your eyesight, how much difficulty do you have finding something on a shelf crowded with items?
not at all difficult...................................................... 1
a little difficult........................................................ 2
moderately difficult...................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................ 4
stopped doing this because of eyesight....................... 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested............................ 6
8. How much difficulty do you have reading street signs, traffic signs, or store names?
not at all difficult........................................................ 1
a little difficult........................................................... 2
moderately difficult......................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................... 4
stopped doing this due to vision......................... 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested............................... 6
9. Because of your eyesight, how much difficulty do you have stepping down steps, stairs, or curbs in dim light or at night?
not at all difficult....................................................... 1
a little difficult.......................................................... 2
moderately difficult...................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................ 4
stopped doing this because of eyesight...................... 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested............................ 6
10. Because of your eyesight, how much difficulty do you have noticing objects off to the side while walking?
not at all difficult....................................................... 1
a little difficult........................................................... 2
quite difficult....................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................. 4
stopped doing this because of eyesight........................ 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested.............................. 6
11. Because of your eyesight, how much difficulty do you have seeing how people react to things you say?
not at all difficult...................................................... 1
a little difficult.......................................................... 2
moderately difficult...................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................ 4
stopped doing this because of eyesight....................... 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested............................. 6
12. Because of your eyesight, how much difficulty do you have picking out and matching your clothes?
not at all difficult...................................................... 1
a little difficult......................................................... 2
moderately difficult...................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................ 4
stopped doing this because of eyesight....................... 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested............................. 6
13. Because of your eyesight, how much difficulty do you have visiting with people in their homes?
not at all difficult...................................................... 1
a little difficult......................................................... 2
moderately difficult...................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................ 4
stopped doing this because of eyesight....................... 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested............................. 6
14. Because of your eyesight, how much difficulty do you have going to movies, plays, or sporting events?
not at all difficult...................................................... 1
a little difficult......................................................... 2
moderately difficult...................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................ 4
stopped doing this because of eyesight....................... 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested............................. 6
15. If you currently drive: how much difficulty do you have driving during the day in familiar places?
not at all difficult....................... 1
a little difficult.......................... 2
moderately difficult........................ 3
extremely difficult.................. 4
16. How much difficulty do you have driving at night in familiar places?
not at all difficult...................................................... 1
a little difficult........................................................ 2
quite difficult....................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................ 4
stopped doing this because of eyesight...................... 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested............................ 6
16a. How difficult is it for you to drive in difficult conditions, such as bad weather, rush hour, highways, or city traffic?
not at all difficult..................................................... 1
a little difficult........................................................ 2
quite a bit of difficulty..................................................... 3
extremely difficult................................................ 4
stopped doing this because of eyesight....................... 5
stopped doing this for other reasons or not interested............................ 6
17. Because of your eyesight, do you accomplish less than you would like?
All of the time.............. 1
Most of the time...................... 2
Some of the time.................... 3
A little of the time...................... 4
None of the time................. 5
18. Because of your eyesight, are you limited in how long you can work or do other activities?
All of the time............. 1
Most of the time..................... 2
Some of the time.................. 3
A little of the time..................... 4
None of the time................. 5
19. How often do you have to give up things you would like to do because of pain or discomfort in and around your eyes, such as burning, itching, or an aching pain?
All of the time............. 1
Most of the time..................... 2
Some of the time.................. 3
A little of the time..................... 4
None of the time................. 5
20. Because of my eyesight, I stay home most of the time:
definitely true............................. 1
mostly true............................. 2
not sure............................................. 3
mostly false.......................... 4
definitely false.......................... 5
21. I am often annoyed and frustrated because of my vision problems:
definitely true............................. 1
mostly true............................. 2
not sure............................................. 3
mostly false.......................... 4
definitely false.......................... 5
22. Because of my eyesight, I have much less control over what I do:
definitely true............................. 1
mostly true............................. 2
not sure............................................. 3
mostly false........................... 4
completely untrue........................... 5
23. Because of my eyesight, I have to rely too much on what other people tell me:
definitely true............................. 1
mostly true............................. 2
not sure............................................. 3
mostly false........................... 4
completely untrue........................... 5
24. Because of my eyesight, I frequently need help from other people:
definitely true............................. 1
mostly true............................. 2
not sure............................................ 3
mostly false........................... 4
completely untrue........................... 5
25. I worry that because of my eyesight, I might do something that will embarrass myself or others:
definitely true............................. 1
mostly true............................. 2
not sure............................................ 3
mostly false........................... 4
completely untrue........................... 5
Interpretation
All questions in the questionnaire are grouped into blocks assessing the patient's physical, mental, and social functioning in relation to their visual quality of life. The total score across all sections of the method allows for assessing the degree of reduction in the patient's quality of life relative to their visual functions.