List of Abbreviations
NOS – Not Otherwise Specified
IV – intravenous (route of administration)
WHO – World Health Organization
CT – computed tomography
RT – radiotherapy
LN – lymph node(s)
ICD-O – International Classification of Diseases for Oncology
MRI — magnetic resonance imaging
ChT – polychemotherapy
PEG – percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
PET – positron emission tomography
LoE – Level of Evidence
USDG – ultrasound Dopplerography
ultrasound – ultrasound examination
LoE – level of evidence / recommendation strength
CRT – chemoradiotherapy
AJCC – American Joint Committee on Cancer
ECOG – Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale
ENE – extracapsular extension
ERAS – Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
IMRT – intensity-modulated radiotherapy (volumetric modulated arc therapy)
QUANTEC – Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic
R0 – tumor-free resection margin
R1 – microscopic residual tumor
TNM – (tumor, node, and metastasis) international classification of cancer staging
VMAT – volumetric modulated arc therapy
Terms and Definitions
Adjuvant chemotherapy – a type of chemotherapy administered after complete surgical removal of the primary tumor to eliminate potential metastases.
Second stage of rehabilitation – inpatient rehabilitation in medical organizations (rehabilitation centers, rehabilitation departments) during the early recovery period of the disease, the late rehabilitation period, and the period of residual disease symptoms.
First stage of rehabilitation – rehabilitation during the period of specialized treatment for the primary disease (including surgical treatment / chemotherapy / radiation therapy) in departments of medical organizations specialized in the primary disease.
Progression – the appearance of a new tumor lesion and/or an increase in the size of the primary tumor lesion or metastatic lesions by more than 25%.
Stabilization – a decrease in the lesion size by less than 50% or an increase by less than 25% with no new lesions appearing.
Levels of Evidence – reflect the degree of certainty that the estimated effect of a medical technology is true. According to epidemiological principles, the certainty of evidence is determined by three main criteria: qualitative and quantitative characteristics, and consistency of evidence.
Grades of Recommendation – unlike levels of evidence, reflect not only the degree of certainty in the intervention's effect, but also the degree of certainty that following the recommendations will bring more benefit than harm in a specific situation.
Electrolarynx – a vibrating electronic device applied to the chin that converts floor-of-the-mouth muscle vibrations into voice. The disadvantage of this method is a metallic voice devoid of timbre and emotional coloring.
3D conformal radiotherapy – precise computer-supported treatment planning based on advanced diagnostic imaging methods, enabling highly precise (conformal) delivery to the target area while minimizing exposure to healthy adjacent tissues and organs at risk.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Hypopharyngeal cancer – a malignant tumor originating from the elements of the non-keratinizing epithelium of the hypopharynx [1].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
In most cases, patient history reveals a prolonged period of smoking, alcohol consumption, employment in dusty environments (textile industry), and inhalation of harmful carcinogenic substances (petroleum, petroleum products, benzene, phenolic resins, asbestos). A high risk of malignant transformation is noted in papillomas (human papillomavirus-associated cancer), recurrent papillomatosis, pachydermia, and dyskeratosis. In addition, chronic inflammatory processes (laryngitis) are considered risk factors [2].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
According to global data, the absolute number of newly diagnosed hypopharyngeal cancer cases in 2020 was 84,254, including 70,254 cases in men and 14,000 cases in women. Age-standardized incidence rates of hypopharyngeal cancer in Russia in 2020 were 0.39–0.98 per 100,000 population among men and 0.12–0.18 per 100,000 population among women [3].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
ICD-10 Coding
C12 Malignant neoplasm of pyriform sinus
Pyriform recess
C13 Malignant neoplasm of hypopharynx
C13.0 Malignant neoplasm of postcricoid region
C13.1 Aryepiglottic fold of hypopharynx
Aryepiglottic fold:
NOS
marginal zone
C13.2 Malignant neoplasm of posterior wall of hypopharynx
C13.8 Lesion of hypopharynx overlapping one or more of the above subcategories
C13.9 Hypopharynx, unspecified
International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O, 4th Edition, 2010): Classification of hypopharyngeal tumors
Malignant epithelial tumors
8070/2 | Squamous cell carcinoma in situ NOS |
|---|---|
8070/3 | Squamous cell carcinoma NOS |
8070/6 | Squamous cell carcinoma, metastatic, NOS |
8071/3 | Squamous cell carcinoma, keratinizing, NOS |
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
The extent of epithelial malignant tumors of the hypopharynx is presented in the TNM classification of malignant tumors (8th edition) by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC).
Clinical classification
The T category includes the following grades:
Tx | Primary tumor cannot be assessed | |
|---|---|---|
Tis | Carcinoma in situ | |
T1 | Tumor limited to one subsite of hypopharynx and/or 2 cm or less in greatest dimension | |
T2 | Tumor invades more than one subsite of hypopharynx or an adjacent site, or measures more than 2 cm but not more than 4 cm in greatest dimension without fixation of hemilarynx | |
T3 | Tumor measures more than 4 cm in greatest dimension or with fixation of hemilarynx, or extension to esophagus | |
T4a | Moderately advanced disease: tumor invades thyroid/cricoid cartilage, hyoid bone, thyroid gland, esophageal muscle, or soft tissues of the central triangle of the neck* | |
T4b | Very advanced local disease: tumor invades prevertebral fascia, encases carotid artery, or extends to mediastinum | |
* The soft tissues of the central triangle of the neck include the infrahyoid muscles and subcutaneous adipose tissue.
The cN symbol indicates the presence or absence of metastases in regional lymph nodes (LNs) based on clinical and instrumental examination data
Nx | Insufficient data to assess regional LNs |
|---|---|
N0 | No evidence of regional lymph node metastasis |
N1 | Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node, 3 cm or less in greatest dimension and ENE-negative |
N2 | Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node, more than 3 cm but not more than 6 cm in greatest dimension and ENE-negative; or in multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension and ENE-negative; or in bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension and ENE-negative |
N2a | Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node larger than 3 cm, but no more than 6 cm in greatest dimension, ENE absent, |
N2b | Metastases in multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes up to 6 cm in greatest dimension, ENE absent |
N2c | Metastases in bilateral or contralateral lymph nodes, 6 cm or less in greatest dimension, and ENE is negative |
N3 | Lymph node metastases > 6 cm in greatest dimension and ENE absent; or metastasis/metastases of any size and ENE+ |
N3a | Lymph node metastases > 6 cm in greatest dimension and ENE absent |
N3b | cervical lymph node metastasis/metastases of any size and ENE+ |
The pN symbol indicates the presence or absence of regional lymph node metastases according to routine pathological examination of the surgical specimen
Nx | Insufficient data to assess regional LNs | |
|---|---|---|
N0 | No evidence of regional lymph node metastasis | |
N1 | Metastases in a single ipsilateral lymph node up to 3 cm (or less) in greatest dimension, extranodal extension (ENE) absent | |
N2 | Metastases in a single ipsilateral lymph node ≤ 3 cm and ENE+, > 3 cm and < 6 cm in greatest dimension and absent; or metastases in multiple ipsilateral cervical lymph nodes up to 6 cm in greatest dimension and ENE absent; or bilateral or contralateral metastases up to 6 cm in greatest dimension and ENE | |
N2a | Metastases in a single ipsilateral lymph node ≤ 3 cm and ENE+; or > 3 cm but ≤ 6 cm in greatest dimension, ENE absent | |
N2b | Metastases in multiple ipsilateral lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension, and ENE is negative | |
N2c | Metastases in bilateral or contralateral neck lymph nodes, none more than 6 cm in greatest dimension, and ENE is negative | |
N3 | Lymph node metastases > 6 cm in greatest dimension and ENE absent; or in a single ipsilateral lymph node > 3 cm and ENE+; or multiple ipsilateral, contralateral, or bilateral metastases with ENE+; or a single contralateral metastasis of any size and ENE+ | |
N3a | Lymph node metastases > 6 cm in greatest dimension and ENE absent | |
N3b | Metastasis in a single ipsilateral lymph node > 3 cm and ENE+; or multiple ipsilateral, contralateral, or bilateral metastases with ENE+; or a single contralateral metastasis of any size and ENE+ | |
The M symbol characterizes the presence or absence of distant metastases
M0 | No distant metastases |
|---|---|
M1 | Presence of distant metastases |
Table 1. Hypopharyngeal cancer stage grouping
Stage | T | N | M |
|---|---|---|---|
0 | is | 0 | 0 |
I | 1 | 0 | 0 |
II | 2 | 0 | 0 |
III | 3 | 0 | 0 |
1–3 | 1 | 0 | |
IVA | 4a | 0–2 | 0 |
1–3 | 2 | 0 | |
IVB | Any T | 3 | 0 |
4b | Any N | 0 | |
IVC | Any T | Any N | 1 |
Grade
Gx – grade cannot be assessed
G1 – well differentiated
G2 – moderately differentiated
G3 – poorly differentiated
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
In early stages, the clinical course of hypopharyngeal cancer is asymptomatic. The main complaints and primary reasons for seeking medical attention are dysphagia (local pain during swallowing, sometimes radiating to the ear on the affected side; functional disorders: choking on food, sensation of saliva "rolling" over a "ridge", food retention, etc.) and voice impairment manifested as hoarseness, rarely – cough. If the process obstructs the laryngeal lumen, breathing difficulties may develop.
When taking the medical history, attention is paid to identifying etiopathogenetic factors of the disease development. History of voice disorders (nature of voice impairment, duration, patient's vocal load requirements) is important, as well as assessment of swallowing and nutritional disorders.
In addition, symptoms such as persistent cough; sore throat unresponsive to antibacterial and anti-inflammatory treatment; painful swallowing; enlargement of cervical lymph nodes may be concerning [2].
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
The diagnosis is established based on:
1) anamestic data, specifically the presence of a neoplasm refractory to conservative treatment for 2–3 weeks;
2) physical examination, including a thorough clinical inspection, palpation of the mass, adjacent tissues, and regional lymph nodes (LNs);
3) cytological examination of smears from tumor punctates, soft tissue tumor-like lesions, and lymph node tissue preparation
4) biopsy of the hypopharyngeal mucosa followed by pathological examination, as well as pathological examination of the lymph node biopsy (surgical) specimen;
5) instrumental examinations, including neck ultrasound (US), fibrolaryngoscopy, computed tomography (CT) / magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), as indicated
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
It is recommended to take a thorough history of complaints and anamnesis in patients with suspected hypopharyngeal cancer to identify factors that may influence the choice of treatment tactics [4]. Smoking cessation counseling. Fertility preservation counseling. Depression screening.
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
2.2 Physical Examination
It is recommended that all patients undergo a thorough physical examination, including inspection and (bimanual) palpation of the lesion and regional LNs to determine the extent of the tumor process and assessment of nutritional status to decide on the need for nutritional support, speech, and swallowing therapy [4].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: Attention should be paid to changes in neck contours and enlargement of regional LNs. Mobility and changes in the laryngeal skeleton should be assessed. Indirect laryngoscopy allows visualization and suspicion of a tumor.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
No specific laboratory diagnostic tests are provided. Laboratory diagnostic tests are performed at the discretion of the oncologist to the extent ensuring effective and safe patient treatment.
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
It is recommended that all patients undergo fibrolaryngoscopy to assess the extent of the process [4].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5 Level of Evidence – C (Quality of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended to perform ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of enlarged cervical LNs (levels II-V) to clarify disease extent and plan treatment [4].
GCP CLOE 5Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 5).
It is recommended that patients undergo contrast-enhanced CT or MRI (possibly contrast-enhanced) of the head and neck if tumor extension to the laryngeal cartilages, skull base, and major neck vessels is suspected [4, 5].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended to perform chest X-ray or chest computed tomography (CT) (with and without contrast) in patients with advanced cancer and cervical LN involvement to detect distant metastases [4].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
It is recommended to perform positron emission tomography 2–3 months after radiation therapy (RT) / chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and resolution of the question regarding omitting lymphadenectomy (in case of primary conservative treatment), and per individual indications [6].
GCR ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2)
Anesthesiologist consultation is recommended; evaluation of pulmonary function in candidates for conservative surgical intervention; multidisciplinary team (tumor board) consultations if necessary.
2.5 Other Procedures
It is recommended to perform a morphological examination of the biopsy (surgical) specimen (hypopharyngeal tumor), as histological study of the biopsy is the primary method for differential diagnosis of hypopharyngeal neoplasms [5].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: Biopsy of the hypopharynx can be performed during fibrolaryngoscopy, indirect laryngoscopy, or direct laryngoscopy.
It is recommended during surgical treatment to perform a morphological examination of the surgical specimen (surgically removed hypopharyngeal tumor specimen) to clarify the histological structure of the tumor, radicality of surgical treatment, and determine further treatment tactics [4].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: the report must reflect the following parameters:
Tumor dimensions.
Depth of tumor invasion.
Histological structure of the tumor.
Tumor grade of differentiation.
Presence of lymphovascular or perineural invasion (a negative result must also be stated).
Size and extent of the primary tumor (pT).
Regional lymph node status (pN) (indicating the total number of examined and involved lymph nodes, signs of extranodal tumor extension).
Presence of resection margin involvement (a negative result must also be stated)
Invasion of laryngeal cartilages.
Invasion of surrounding organs and tissues.
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
Treatment tactics for hypopharyngeal cancer aim not only at curing the patient but also at restoring swallowing, voice, respiratory, and protective functions of the organ and depend on the localization of the hypopharyngeal lesion, the extent of the tumor process, and the tumor's sensitivity to radiation or drug therapy.
3.1. Treatment Strategy
For patients with stage T1-2N0M0 hypopharyngeal cancer, it is recommended to administer definitive radical radiation therapy alone or concurrent CRT (for T2N0M0) to improve survival rates [7, 8].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
For stage T1-2N0M0 hypopharyngeal cancer, it is recommended to perform organ-preserving surgery to improve survival and reduce treatment toxicity [9].
GRL ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comment: When choosing a surgical treatment method, it is advisable to perform transoral surgery (removal of the laryngeal neoplasm by laser resection) with unilateral or bilateral neck dissection per indications (prophylactic neck dissection); partial laryngopharyngectomy (open or endoscopic) + ipsilateral or bilateral neck dissection. Following surgical treatment, further management depends on the presence/absence of adverse pathological features (APFs) according to the morphological examination of the surgical specimen. The absence of APFs and pN0 status do not require additional treatment; active surveillance is advisable. Indications for postoperative RT include the presence of only a single regional metastasis pN1 without ENE or only a single APF (perineural, perivascular, perilymphatic invasion) in the absence of other APFs.
An indication for postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the presence of two or more adverse pathological factors (APFs): pT3–4, perineural, perivascular, or perilymphatic invasion. If the only APF is microscopic residual tumor (R1), reresection is indicated (if feasible); if not feasible, concurrent CRT is indicated. The presence of ENE+ either alone or in combination with other APFs is an indication for concurrent CRT [10].
Prognostically unfavorable characteristics (factors): extranodal extension, positive resection margins, tumor growth close to the resection margin, pT3 or pT4, pN2 or pN3, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion [10].
T1N+, T2–3 (resectable), any N (if pharyngeal resection with partial or total laryngectomy is required) - the following treatment methods are recommended:
For hypopharyngeal cancer stages T1N+, T2–3, any N M0, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent CRT is recommended to improve survival and reduce the risk of distant metastasis [11].
GOR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
In case of complete regression of the primary tumor (according to WHO criteria) after induction chemotherapy (based on neck computed tomography with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement or neck magnetic resonance imaging with intravenous contrast enhancement, fibrolaryngoscopy, ultrasound of neck lymph nodes), standalone RT or CRT is performed. In case of partial regression of the primary tumor, CRT or surgical treatment is performed. If tumor regression is less than 50%, surgical treatment is advisable, followed by deciding on indications for RT/CRT. In the presence of residual tumor and/or metastatic LNs after completion of RT/CRT, surgical treatment is advisable. In case of complete regression after conservative treatment methods, follow-up monitoring is indicated.
Comment: evaluation of conservative therapy efficacy should be performed 2–3 months after completion of the treatment course.
For hypopharyngeal cancer stages T1N+, T2–3, any N M0, partial or total laryngopharyngectomy (any modification - laryngopharyngectomy with pedicled flap reconstruction, laryngopharyngectomy with bioengineered reconstruction, laryngopharyngectomy with microvascular reconstruction, laryngopharyngectomy with microvascular reconstruction using video-endoscopic technologies) + unilateral or bilateral (as indicated) neck dissection is recommended to improve patient survival [4].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: Following surgical treatment, further management is discussed depending on the presence/absence of APFs according to the morphological examination of the surgical specimen.
An indication for postoperative RT is the presence of only a single regional metastasis pN1 without ENE or only a single APF (perineural, perivascular, perilymphatic invasion) in the absence of other APFs.
An indication for postoperative CRT is the presence of two or more APFs: pT3–4, perineural, perivascular, perilymphatic invasion. If the only APF is microscopic residual tumor (R1), reresection is indicated (if feasible); if not feasible, concurrent CRT is indicated. The presence of ENE+ either alone or in combination with other APFs is an indication for concurrent CRT.
For hypopharyngeal cancer stage T4aNAnyM0, laryngopharyngectomy with unilateral or bilateral (as indicated) neck lymph node dissection (including level VI) + hemi- or thyroidectomy followed by RT or chemoradiotherapy is recommended to improve patient survival [4].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: Following surgical treatment, further management is discussed depending on the presence/absence of APFs according to the morphological examination of the surgical specimen. The absence of APFs and pN0 status do not require additional treatment; follow-up monitoring is advisable. An indication for postoperative RT/CRT is the presence of at least one of the APFs: pT3–4; perineural, perivascular, perilymphatic invasion; pN+. If the only APF is R1, reresection is indicated (if feasible); if not feasible, concurrent CRT is indicated. The presence of ENE+ either alone or in combination with other APFs is an indication for concurrent CRT.
For hypopharyngeal cancer stage T4aNAnyM0, induction chemotherapy is recommended to increase patient survival rates [11].
GOR ALOE 1Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 1).
In case of complete/partial regression of the primary tumor (according to WHO criteria) after induction chemotherapy (based on neck computed tomography with intravenous bolus contrast enhancement or neck magnetic resonance imaging with intravenous contrast enhancement, fibrolaryngoscopy, ultrasound of neck lymph nodes), concurrent CRT is performed. If tumor regression is less than 50%, surgical treatment is performed, followed by deciding on indications for CRT. Following surgical treatment, further management is discussed depending on the presence/absence of APFs according to the morphological examination of the surgical specimen. An indication for postoperative CRT is the presence of at least one of the APFs: pT3; perineural, perivascular, perilymphatic invasion; pN+. If the only APF is R1, reresection is indicated (if feasible); if not feasible, concurrent CRT is indicated. The presence of pT4, ENE+ either alone or in combination with other APFs is an indication for concurrent CRT. In the presence of residual tumor and/or metastatic LNs after completion of RT/CRT, surgical treatment is performed. In case of complete regression after conservative treatment methods, follow-up monitoring is indicated [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: evaluation of conservative therapy efficacy should be performed 2-3 months after completion of the treatment course.
For hypopharyngeal cancer stage T4aNAnyM0, concurrent chemoradiotherapy is recommended [12].
GRL ALEL 2Grade of Recommendation – A (Level of Evidence – 2).
In the presence of residual tumor and/or metastatic LNs after completion of CRT, surgical treatment is performed. In case of complete regression after conservative treatment methods, follow-up monitoring is indicated [4].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: evaluation of conservative therapy efficacy should be performed 2-3 months after completion of the treatment course.
For patients with local recurrence without prior radiation therapy, surgical intervention (for resectable cases) is recommended to improve survival [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: the absence of APFs and pN0 status do not require additional treatment; follow-up monitoring is performed. An indication for postoperative RT/CRT is the presence of at least one of the APFs: pT3–4, perineural, perivascular, perilymphatic invasion, pN+. If the only APF is R1, reresection is indicated (if feasible); if not feasible, concurrent CRT is indicated. The presence of pT4, ENE+ either alone or in combination with other APFs is an indication for concurrent CRT.
or
In case of local recurrence without prior radiation therapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy is recommended to improve survival [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
In case of local recurrence or residual tumor without prior radiation therapy, induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (if ECOG performance status is 0–1 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale) is recommended to improve survival [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
In case of local recurrence or residual tumor without prior radiation therapy, palliative RT or systemic drug therapy (using a single agent) (for unresectable cases and ECOG 2; see Appendix G) is recommended to improve survival [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Local recurrence or residual tumor after radiation therapy.
In case of local recurrence or residual tumor after radiation therapy when the tumor is resectable, surgical intervention with discussion of re-irradiation or concurrent chemoradiotherapy is recommended to improve patient survival [4].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
In case of local recurrence or residual tumor after radiation therapy when the tumor is unresectable, drug therapy, discussion of re-irradiation/concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or symptomatic treatment is recommended to improve survival [4].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendations – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
In case of local recurrence or residual tumor with distant metastases with an ECOG performance status of 0–1 (see Appendix G), drug therapy is recommended to improve survival [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: In selected cases with solitary metastases, surgical treatment or CRT may be considered.
In case of local recurrence or residual tumor with distant metastases with an ECOG performance status of 2, drug therapy is recommended to increase survival or symptomatic treatment to relieve patient discomfort [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
In case of a local recurrence or residual tumor with distant metastases, with an ECOG performance status of 3 (see Appendix G), recommended is symptomatic treatment aimed at alleviating the patient's condition [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
3.2 Surgical Treatment
Introduction: Surgical treatment involves procedures of varying extent aimed at removing the primary tumor focus, including organ-preserving techniques (endolaryngeal laser resection, endoscopic resection), open resection of affected hypopharyngeal sites (pyriform sinus, posterior hypopharyngeal wall), combined horizontal resection of the larynx with resection of the posterior cricoid/arytenoid region of the hypopharynx, and laryngectomy, as well as restoring the integrity of the upper gastrointestinal tract using various reconstructive and plastic surgery techniques (voice prosthetics may be performed).
For hypopharyngeal cancer with no clinical signs of cervical lymph node involvement, prophylactic unilateral/bilateral neck dissection (levels 2–4) is recommended for all patients to reduce the risk of locoregional recurrence and improve survival [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: Hypopharyngeal cancer is characterized by a high risk of regional metastasis even in T1–2 (50% of cases).
Removal of level II–V lymph nodes is advisable in the presence of one of the following factors:
- palpable metastasis in level IV or V;
- regional metastasis greater than 6 cm in diameter;
- large multiple metastases (greater than 3 cm);
- pronounced extracapsular tumor spread with involvement of major anatomical structures (sternocleidomastoid muscle, internal jugular vein, common carotid artery);
- regional recurrence.
Removal of level VI lymph nodes is advisable in case of T3–4a tumor extent or suspected metastasis in level VI [13].
3.3 Conservative Management
Prior to treatment, all patients should be evaluated by a radiation oncologist, preferably one specializing in head and neck tumors, who should take the following steps: review the adequacy of the biopsy material, staging, and imaging of the tumor process (CT, MRI) to determine the extent of tumor spread, rule out synchronous primary tumors, assess current functional status and eligibility for radiation/chemoradiation therapy, and develop a prospective follow-up plan that includes oropharyngeal sanitation, including dental examination, provision of adequate nutrition, analgesia, wound healing, and other measures necessary for maximum patient rehabilitation. For patients undergoing radiation/chemoradiation therapy, a plan for implementing antitumor therapy in full and within optimal timeframes must be developed. The radiation dose to radical doses should not be modified based on the clinical response achieved prior to radiation therapy (after induction polychemotherapy), except in cases of tumor progression. It is permissible to discuss reducing the volume by excluding vital structures free of tumor involvement at the time of radiotherapy planning, provided the dose limits for these structures are exceeded according to QUANTEC criteria (quantitative analyses of normal tissue effects in the clinic).
Comment:Preference is given to 3D conformal external beam radiation therapy (3D-CRT), as well as external beam radiation therapy using complex dose delivery techniques: IMRT (Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy), VMAT (volumetric-modulated arc therapy (volumetric modulated arc therapy)) [4].
For patients with hypopharyngeal cancer scheduled for radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, proton beam conformal external beam radiation therapy is recommended as an alternative radiation therapy method to reduce the frequency and severity of radiation reactions and thus improve treatment tolerability [14].
GOR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 3).
RT Regimens
Exclusive RT is recommended for the primary tumor and clinically detectable regional metastases at 66–70 Gy (2.0–2.2 Gy/fraction) daily Monday through Friday for 6–7 weeks; for the locoregional region, including regional lymph nodes, from 44–50 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction) to 54–63 Gy (1.6–1.8 Gy/fraction), taking into account the risk of subclinical involvement, to improve survival rates [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as a standalone option is recommended for the primary tumor and clinically detectable regional metastases at 70 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction) daily Monday through Friday for 7 weeks; for the locoregional region, including regional lymph nodes, from 44–50 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction) to 54–63 Gy (1.6–1.8 Gy/fraction), taking into account the risk of subclinical involvement [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comment: The standard is the use of cisplatin** at a dose of 100 mg/m² with hyperhydration on days 1, 22, and 43 of RT (the target cumulative dose during RT is 300 mg/m²) [15, 16]. Following induction polychemotherapy (PCT), carboplatin** (AUC 1.5–2 weekly) or cetuximab** is indicated as an alternative to cisplatin**, taking into account the tolerability of CRT and the patient's performance status. Cetuximab** is administered IV at a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 one week before the start of RT, followed by a maintenance dose of 250 mg/m2 weekly during RT. Omission of platinum-based chemoradiotherapy regimens in favor of cetuximab** is advisable in case of a high risk of failure/incomplete implementation of the standalone chemoradiotherapy plan and a high risk of platinum drug side effects (glomerular filtration rate less than 50–60 ml/min, patient age over 65 years, severe concomitant renal, cardiovascular, neurological, hepatic pathology, and/or debilitated patient status – ECOG >1). [17] (see Appendix G).
The following regimen may be used in the CRT protocol: #Carboplatin** 70 mg/m2 IV drip on days 1 to 4 + #fluorouracil** (600 mg/m4) IV drip on days 1 to 4, once every 21 days [46, 48].
Postoperative RT is recommended for stages pT3 and N0, as well as selected patients with stages pT1–2, N1 (in the presence of adverse features) [4]. The interval between resection and postoperative RT should not exceed 6 weeks. Postoperative RT to the tumor bed: 60–66 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction); daily Monday through Friday for 6–6.5 weeks. To the locoregional region, including regional lymph nodes: from 44–50 Gy (2.0 Gy/fraction) or up to 54–63 Gy (1.6–1.8 Gy/fraction).
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Postoperative RT is recommended in cases of – pT3, the presence of only a single regional metastasis pN1 without ENE, or only a single adverse pathological feature (perineural, perivascular, or perilymphatic invasion) provided no other adverse features are present [4, 10].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Postoperative CRT is recommended in the presence of two or more adverse pathological features: pT3, perineural, perivascular, or perilymphatic invasion. In the presence of only one adverse pathological feature – microscopic residual tumor (R1) – reresection is indicated (if feasible); if not feasible, concurrent CRT is indicated. The presence of pT4, ENE+ isolated or in combination with other adverse pathological features is an indication for concurrent CRT [4, 10].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: prognostically unfavorable characteristics (factors): extranodal extension, positive resection margins, tumor growth close to the resection margin, pT3 or pT4, pN2 or pN3, perineural invasion, vascular invasion, lymphatic invasion.
Postoperative concurrent CRT is recommended when the tumor invades the lymph node capsule or in case of a positive resection margin (if reoperation is declined), and is also discussed in the presence of two or more unfavorable factors combined (pT3 or pT4; N2 or N3, presence of perineural invasion and/or tumor emboli in lymphatic vessels) [4].
GCR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence - 5).
3.4. Principles of Medical Chemotherapy
The choice of chemotherapy should be individualized based on patient characteristics (general status, treatment goals). The presented chemotherapy regimens are indicated for squamous cell carcinoma. Chemotherapy regimens for other histological tumor types (e.g., sarcomas) can be found in the relevant clinical guidelines.
When choosing induction CT as the primary treatment method for all patients with hypopharyngeal cancer with the aim of improving survival, it is recommended to use the following PCT regimen: docetaxel** 75 mg/m2 on day 1 + cisplatin** 75 mg/m2 on day 1 + fluorouracil** 1000 mg/m2/day on days 1–4, for a total of 2–3 cycles of CT with a 3-week interval [47].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
As concurrent CRT following induction for all patients with hypopharyngeal cancer with the aim of improving survival, it is recommended to administer CT including cisplatin** 100 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks [19].
Level of Recommendations C Level of Evidence 5Level of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: considering the high toxicity of the specified concurrent therapy regimen, weekly administration of carboplatin **AUC 1.5–2 or cetuximab **400 mg/m2 one week before radiotherapy or 250 mg/m2 weekly during radiotherapy is possible. If there are comorbid conditions precluding concurrent chemoradiotherapy containing platinum coordination compounds (chronic renal failure, severe heart disease, etc.), replacing platinum coordination compounds with cetuximab ** during radiotherapy is preferred [18].
It is recommended to use the following chemoradiotherapy regimen: #Carboplatin ** 70 mg/m2 IV infusion on days 1–4 + #fluorouracil ** (600 mg/m2) IV infusion on days 1–4, once every 21 days [4, 46, 48].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 4Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 4).
For patients with a local unresectable recurrence or residual tumor who have undergone radiotherapy, as well as in the presence of distant metastases, mono- or polychemotherapy is recommended to increase survival [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comment: depending on the patient's general condition and/or treatment goals, the following drugs or their combinations may be prescribed as the 1st line (the number of cycles is determined by treatment tolerance and efficacy):
Table 1. Drug therapy regimens for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Regimen name | Treatment schedule |
PF+Cet | Cisplatin ** 75–100 mg / m2 IV on day 1 + fluorouracil **1000 mg / m2 / day IV 96-hour infusion on days 1–4, every 3 weeks + cetuximab **400 mg / m2 (loading dose), then 250 mg / m2 IV weekly [47]. After 6 cycles, chemotherapy is completed, and in the absence of disease progression, it is recommended to continue maintenance therapy with cetuximab **250 mg / m2 IV weekly |
DC + Cet | #Docetaxel 75 mg / m2 IV on day 1 + cisplatin **75 mg / m2 IV on day 1, every 3 weeks + cetuximab **400 mg / m2 (loading dose) IV, then #cetuximab ** — 250 mg / m3 IV weekly. After 4 cycles, chemotherapy is completed, and in the absence of disease progression, it is recommended to continue maintenance therapy with cetuximab **500 mg / m2 IV once every 2 weeks [47]. |
Cisplatin + Cet | Cisplatin **75–100 mg / m2 once every 3 weeks (no more than 6–8 administrations) + cetuximab **400 mg / m2 (loading dose) IV on day 1, then 250 mg / m2 IV weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. |
Pacli + Carbo + Cet | #Paclitaxel **100 mg / m2 IV + carboplatin **AUC 2.5 IV on days 1 and 8 + cetuximab 400 mg / m2 IV (2-hour infusion) on day 1 of cycle 1 (loading dose), then cetuximab ** — 250 mg / m2 IV (1-hour infusion) weekly. Cycle duration is 21 days. |
Pacli + Carbo + Cet | #Paclitaxel **175 mg / m2 IV + carboplatin **AUC 5–6 IV on day 1 + cetuximab **400 mg / m2 IV (2-hour infusion) on day 1 of cycle 1 (loading dose), then #cetuximab ** — 250 mg / m2 IV (1-hour infusion) weekly. Cycle duration is 21 days. After completing 6 cycles of chemotherapy, in the absence of disease progression, it is recommended to continue maintenance therapy with #cetuximab **250 mg / m2 IV weekly [47]. |
Pacli + Carbo + Cet1 | #Paclitaxel **80 mg / m2 IV weekly + carboplatin **AUC 2.0 IV weekly + cetuximab **400 mg / m2 IV (2-hour infusion) on day 1 of cycle 1, then 250 mg / m2 IV weekly. After completing chemotherapy, in the absence of disease progression, it is recommended to continue maintenance therapy with #cetuximab **250 mg / m2 IV weekly. The number of antineoplastic drug administrations is determined individually [47]. |
PF 2 | Cisplatin **75–100 mg / m2 IV on day 1 + #fluorouracil **1000 mg / m2 / day IV 96-hour infusion on days 1–4, every 3 weeks. Carboplatin **AUC-5 IV on day 1 + fluorouracil **1000 mg / m2 IV 96-hour infusion on days 1–4, every 3 weeks. The total number of cycles is 6; in the absence of toxicity and with progressive positive dynamics, it can be increased to 8. The total number of cycles is 6; in the absence of toxicity and with progressive positive dynamics it can be increased to 8. |
Pacli +Carbo2 | #Paclitaxel **175 mg / m2 IV on day 1 + carboplatin **AUC-5–6 IV on day 1 every 3 weeks. The total number of cycles is 6; in the absence of toxicity and with progressive positive dynamics, it can be increased to 8 [47]. #Paclitaxel **60–80 mg / m2 IV weekly + carboplatin ** AUC-2 IV weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, but for no more than 18 weeks. |
DC2 | #Docetaxel **75 mg / m2 IV on day 1 + cisplatin **75 mg / m2 IV on day 1, every 3 weeks. The total number of cycles is 6; in the absence of toxicity and with progressive positive dynamics, it can be increased to 8 [47]. |
Nivolumab**3 | Nivolumab ** 3 mg/kg IV once every 2 weeks or 240 mg once every 2 weeks or 480 mg once every 4 weeks. 60-minute infusion (first administration), then 30-minute infusion until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, but for no more than 2 years. |
Pembrolizumab **4 | #Pembrolizumab **200 mg IV once every 3 weeks (30-minute infusion) or 400 mg once every 6 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, but for no more than 2 years. |
PF + Pembrolizu- mab**5 | #Pembrolizumab **200 mg + carboplatin **AUC 5 or cisplatin **100 mg / m2 + #fluorouracil **1000 mg / m2 days 1–4 once every 3 weeks (6 cycles), then pembrolizumab **200 mg once every 3 weeks or 400 mg once every 6 weeks. Maximum up to 35 administrations in total [47]. |
Monotherapy for patients with an ECOG performance status > 2 points | |
Cisplatin **60–70 mg / m2 IV once every 3 weeks. The number of administrations is determined individually, but the feasibility of a duration exceeding 6–8 administrations is questionable. | |
Carboplatin **AUC 5–6 IV once every 3 weeks. Or carboplatin AUC 2 IV weekly. The number of administrations is determined individually. | |
#Paclitaxel **175 mg / m2 IV once every 3 weeks or paclitaxel 80 mg / m2 IV weekly. The number of administrations is determined individually [47]. | |
#Docetaxel **70–75 mg / m2 IV once every 3 weeks. The number of administrations is determined individually [47]. | |
#Capecitabine **2000 mg / m2 orally in 2 doses on days 1–14, 1 week rest or 2000 mg / day orally daily in a metronomic regimen. The duration of therapy is determined individually [47]. | |
#Methotrexate **40 mg / m2 IV weekly. The number of administrations is determined individually [47]. | |
#Cetuximab **400 mg / m2 IV (2-hour infusion) on day 1 of cycle 1, then 250 mg / m2 IV weekly [47]. | |
For patients with an ECOG performance status of 2 points.
Suboptimal treatment regimens; applicable only in case of absolute contraindications to anti-EGFR mAbs.
In the 2nd and subsequent lines of therapy for platinum-resistant tumors. Can be prescribed regardless of the level of PD-L1 expression.
As the 1st line in the presence of PD-L1 expression CPS >20. Upon progression during or after chemotherapy including platinum-based drugs, with a TPS level ≥ 50%. The recommended duration of use corresponds to the design of registration clinical trials.
As the 1st line with PD-L1 expression ≥ 1%.
The regimen corresponds to clinical trials; in case of poor tolerance, the dose should be reduced.
Note: The presented chemotherapy regimens are indicated for squamous cell carcinoma. Chemotherapy regimens for other histological tumor types (e.g., sarcomas) should be viewed in the relevant clinical guidelines.
When choosing induction chemotherapy as the primary treatment method for all patients with hypopharyngeal cancer, in order to improve survival, it is recommended to use the following polychemotherapy regimen: docetaxel** 75 mg/m2 on day 1 + cisplatin** 75 mg/m2 on day 1 + fluorouracil** 1000 mg/m2/day on days 1–4, for a total of 2–3 chemotherapy courses with an interval of 3 weeks [18].
Paclitaxel **/cisplatin **/fluorouracil ** - another recommended regimen
LoE CGoE 5Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 5).
Simultaneous chemotherapy based on platinum coordination compounds is advisable, preferably with cisplatin **at a dose of 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, or a combination of #docetaxel **15 mg\m2 + #cetuximab ** at a loading dose of 400 mg/m2 one week before the start of radiotherapy, followed by a maintenance dose of 250 mg/m2 weekly during radiotherapy [18, 50].
LoE CGoE 5Level of Evidence – C (Grade of Recommendation – 5)
Recommended: in the presence of comorbid conditions precluding concurrent chemoradiotherapy containing platinum-based agents (chronic kidney disease, severe heart disease, etc.), substituting platinum-based agents with cetuximab** combined with radiotherapy is preferred [17].
GCP CLoE 5Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) – C (Level of Evidence – 5)
3.5 Other treatments
The procedure and recommendations for pain management in malignant neoplasms of the hypopharynx correspond to the guidelines presented in the clinical guidelines "Chronic pain syndrome (CPS) in adult patients requiring palliative medical care".
3.6. Dietary therapy
The need for medical nutrition (diet therapy) is determined by the patient's nutritional status, as well as the advisability of correcting comorbid conditions and preventing treatment complications; therefore, the principles of medical nutrition and indications are presented in the section «Medical rehabilitation, indications and contraindications for the use of rehabilitation methods».
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
It is recommended that all patients with malignant hypopharyngeal tumors undergo prophylactic exercise programs and swallowing technique training before starting treatment to reduce swallowing disorders during antineoplastic therapy [31].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: Nutritional support during the planning of surgical treatment is provided if at least one of the following factors is present: unintentional weight loss over the past 6 months (10% or more loss), body mass index <20 kg/m2, hypoproteinemia <60 g/l or hypoalbuminemia <30 g/l, or deteriorated food intake over the past week. In the case of chemotherapy, indications include: body mass index <20 kg/m2; weight loss of more than 5% over 6 months; hypoproteinemia <60 g/l or hypoalbuminemia <30 g/l; inability to maintain adequate oral intake; moderate to severe enteropathy.
For patients with malignant neoplasms of the hypopharynx receiving chemotherapy, it is recommended to start physical therapy early to prevent the onset and progression of sarcopenia, reduce fatigue, improve the quality of life and psychological state of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, and increase exercise tolerance [33].
GOR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 3).
Comments: Performing a set of physical exercises including aerobic loads and Tai Chi elements for 4 months during chemotherapy leads to an increase in vital capacity of the lungs, blood oxygen saturation, muscle strength, range of motion in large joints, and a decrease in body mass index [34].
To reduce fatigue and increase endurance in patients with malignant neoplasms of the hypopharynx during chemoradiotherapy, it is recommended to perform physical therapy in the form of moderate-intensity aerobic exercises combined with resistance training [35].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Comment: Combining physical therapy with psychotherapy is used as part of comprehensive management of chemotherapy-induced fatigue [36]. In addition, a 6-week course of medical massage is advisable to reduce fatigue during combined treatment [37].
Balance therapy is recommended for patients with oral cavity malignancies to correct polyneuropathy [38].
GOR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 3).
Low-frequency magnetotherapy is recommended for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral polyneuropathy [39].
GCP BLoE 2Grade of Recommendation – B (Level of Evidence – 2).
Low-level laser therapy is recommended for the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis [42].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
The use of devices for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced alopecia is recommended during chemotherapy [40].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Low-level laser therapy is recommended to prevent hair loss and accelerate hair growth after chemotherapy [41].
GCR BLOE 3Grade of Recommendations — B (Level of Evidence — 3).
It is recommended to start low-level laser therapy 3 days after the start of radiotherapy and administer it 3 days a week to prevent radiation dermatitis [42].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: From the onset of manifestations until the complete disappearance of radiation mucositis, the use of agents with emollient and protective action — tissue repair stimulators (gels, urea solution, etc.) is indicated. Regular irrigation of the oral cavity with an isotonic solution (sodium chloride** 0.9%) removes food debris and accumulated secretions. Oils are used for oral applications or nose drops. In the presence of pain, local anesthetics and systemic analgesics are used [43]. Opioids are most commonly required, and attention should be paid to their transdermal application forms [44].
From the onset of radiation dermatitis and until reactions subside completely, the use of agents with emollient and protective properties (gels, dioxomethyltetrahydropyrimidine, riboflavin), as well as sunscreens, is indicated. The skin must be protected from friction and irritation. To combat xerosis, a cream with urea and an oil solution of vitamin A (retinol) are used.
In the post-radiation period, normal irradiated tissues are very vulnerable and must therefore be handled with care. Invasive diagnostic procedures and biopsies are not indicated in the early stages unless absolutely necessary. Selection of a diet is indicated, if necessary in combination with medications for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease [45]. Trauma, alcohol, smoking, and irritating foods easily cause mucosal ulceration, which is often accompanied by exposure of the mandible bone followed by the development of osteomyelitis. A frequent cause of radiation osteomyelitis is tooth extraction in the previously irradiated area, and therefore conservative methods should be used whenever possible, and tooth extraction should only be performed when necessary, accompanied by antibiotic therapy.
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
For the purpose of prevention and early diagnosis, attention should be paid to the following aspects:
Primary symptoms:
In the early stages of the disease, it is asymptomatic. Patients complain of paresthesia, dryness, a foreign body sensation in the throat, discomfort when swallowing; later these symptoms are joined by pain when swallowing radiating to the ear on the affected side, and difficulty swallowing. When breakdown phenomena occur, a foul breath odor and hemoptysis appear. Sometimes patients independently notice the presence of neck masses.
Carcinogenic factors:
Smoking (including passive smoking), alcohol consumption, contact with asbestos, wood dust, petroleum products, and exposure to ionizing radiation.
Precancerous conditions.
Chronic inflammatory diseases, leukoplakia of the hypopharyngeal mucosa, papillomas.
Dispenser observation (Follow-up):
It is recommended that patients adhere to the following frequency and methods of follow-up by an oncologist after completing treatment for hypopharyngeal cancer:
In the 1st year, physical examination and history taking are recommended every 1–3 months, in the 2nd year every 2–6 months, and at 3–5 years every 4–8 months. After 5 years from the completion of specialized treatment, visits are conducted annually or upon the appearance of complaints. In high-risk patients, the interval between examinations may be shortened [4].
GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).
Comments: The scope of examination includes:
1) History and physical examination
2) Ultrasound of bilateral neck lymph nodes, abdominal organs (comprehensive), and pelvic organs (comprehensive);
3) CT/MRI (computed tomography of the upper respiratory tract and neck, spiral computed tomography of the neck, computed tomography of the brain, computed tomography of the soft tissues of the head with contrast, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain with contrast, magnetic resonance imaging of the neck) as indicated, as well as when the area is inaccessible to adequate physical examination.
4) Fibrolaryngoscopy
5) Targeted chest X-ray or chest CT every 12 months.
6) Ultrasound, CT/MRI of abdominal organs (comprehensive) as indicated
7) Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals / Positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals with contrast as indicated
8) Determination of blood thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels every 6–12 months if neck irradiation was performed, to assess thyroid function.
The goal of follow-up is the early detection of disease progression for the early initiation of chemotherapy or surgical treatment of resectable metastatic lesions and recurrent tumors, as well as the detection of metachronous head and neck tumors.
6. Organization of Medical Care
Medical care, with the exception of medical care within the framework of clinical trials, in accordance with Federal Law No. 323-FZ dated November 21, 2011 (as amended on May 25, 2019) "On the Fundamentals of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation", is organized and provided:
1) in accordance with the regulations on the organization of medical care by types of medical care, approved by the authorized federal executive body;
2) in accordance with the procedure for the provision of medical care in the profile "oncology", mandatory for implementation throughout the Russian Federation by all medical organizations;
3) based on these clinical guidelines;
4) taking into account the standards of medical care approved by the authorized federal executive body.
Primary specialized health care is provided by an oncologist and other medical specialists at an outpatient oncological care center or in a primary oncological office, primary oncological department, or outpatient department of an oncological dispensary.
If an oncological disease is suspected or detected in a patient, general practitioners, district general practitioners, general family practitioners, specialist physicians, and mid-level medical personnel shall, in the established manner, refer the patient for a consultation to an outpatient oncological care center, a primary oncological office, or a primary oncological department of a medical organization to receive primary specialized health care. The consultation at an outpatient oncological care center, primary oncological office, or primary oncological department of a medical organization must be conducted no later than 5 working days from the date of issuance of the referral for consultation. The oncologist of the outpatient oncological care center (or the oncologist of the primary oncological office or primary oncological department, if an outpatient oncological care center is absent) shall organize the collection of biopsy (surgical) material, as well as the performance of other diagnostic examinations necessary to establish the diagnosis, including the extent of the oncological process and the stage of the disease. If it is impossible to collect biopsy (surgical) material or perform other diagnostic examinations at the medical organization that houses the outpatient oncological care center (primary oncological office, primary oncological department), the attending physician shall refer the patient to an oncological dispensary or a medical organization providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases.
The timeframe for performing pathological examinations necessary for the histological verification of malignant neoplasms of the hypopharynx must not exceed 15 working days from the date of receipt of the biopsy (surgical) material by the pathological anatomy bureau (department).
If an oncological disease is suspected and/or detected in a patient during the provision of emergency medical care, the patient is transferred or referred to medical organizations providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases to determine management tactics and the need for additional other methods of specialized antitumor treatment.
The oncologist of the outpatient oncological care center (primary oncological office, primary oncological department) shall refer the patient to an oncological dispensary or medical organizations providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases to clarify the diagnosis (if the oncologist of the outpatient oncological care center, primary oncological office, or primary oncological department is unable to establish the diagnosis, including the extent of the oncological process and the stage of the disease) and to receive specialized, including high-tech, medical care.
The timeframe for initiating specialized, excluding high-tech, medical care for patients with oncological diseases in a medical organization providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases must not exceed 14 calendar days from the date of histological verification of the malignant neoplasm of the hypopharynx or 14 calendar days from the date of establishing a preliminary diagnosis of a malignant neoplasm (in the absence of medical indications for outpatient pathological examinations).
Specialized, including high-tech, medical care is provided by oncologists and radiation therapists in an oncological dispensary or in medical organizations providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases that hold a license, have the necessary material and technical base and certified specialists, in inpatient and day-hospital settings, and includes the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of oncological diseases requiring the use of special methods and complex unique medical technologies, as well as medical rehabilitation.
In a medical organization providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases, the tactics of medical examination and treatment are established by a concilium of oncologists and radiation therapists, involving other medical specialists if necessary. The decision of the medical concilium is formalized in a protocol, signed by the participants of the medical concilium, and entered into the patient's medical documentation.
Indications for admission to an inpatient or day care unit of a medical organization providing specialized, including high-tech, medical care in the field of oncology are determined by a concilium of oncologists and radiation therapists, involving other medical specialists if necessary.
Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization in an emergency or urgent form are:
1) the presence of complications of the oncological disease requiring the provision of specialized medical care in an emergency and urgent form;
2) presence of complications of treatment (surgical intervention, RT, drug therapy, etc.) of the oncological disease.
Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization in a planned form are:
1) the need to perform complex interventional diagnostic medical procedures requiring subsequent monitoring in an inpatient or day-hospital setting;
2) the presence of indications for specialized antitumor treatment (surgical intervention, RT, including contact, EBRD and other types of RT, drug therapy, etc.) requiring monitoring in an inpatient or day hospital setting.
Indications for discharging a patient from a medical organization are:
1) completion of a course of treatment or one of the stages of providing specialized, including high-tech, medical care in an inpatient or day hospital setting, provided there are no treatment complications requiring drug correction and/or medical interventions in an inpatient setting;
2) refusal of the patient or their legal representative from specialized, including high-tech, medical care in an inpatient or day hospital setting established by the multidisciplinary team of the medical organization providing cancer care, provided there are no complications of the underlying disease and/or treatment requiring drug correction and/or medical interventions in an inpatient setting;
3) in cases of non-compliance by the patient with prescriptions or the internal regulations of the medical and prophylactic institution, provided this does not threaten the patient's life and the health of others;
4) the need to transfer the patient to another medical organization according to the relevant medical specialty profile.
The conclusion on the advisability of transferring a patient to a specialized medical organization is made after a preliminary consultation on the provided medical documents and/or a preliminary examination of the patient by specialist physicians of the medical organization to which the transfer is planned.
7. Additional Information
Factors influencing the prognosis of the disease include:
- size and extent of the primary tumor;
- tumor grade;
- presence/absence of perivascular, perilymphatic, perineural invasion;
- regional lymph node status (pN) (neck lymph node metastases double patient mortality);
- extranodal tumor extension;
- resection margin status (R0-1)
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria | Grade of Recommendation | Level of evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
1. | Pathological examination of biopsy material performed upon establishing the diagnosis) | C | 5 |
2. | CT or MRI of the head and neck performed in case of suspected tumor extension to the laryngeal cartilages, skull base, and major neck vessels | C | 5 |
3. | Chest CT was performed | C | 5 |
4. | Pathological examination of surgical material (removed tissue specimen) performed (in case of surgical intervention) | C | 5 |
5. | Neck lymph node dissection with removal of levels II-IV neck lymph nodes performed (in case of surgical intervention) | C | 4 |
References
Show references
Davydov M.I. Encyclopedia of Clinical Oncology. M.: RLS-2004, 2004
Paches A.I., Matyakin E.G. Hypopharyngeal tumors. Head and neck tumors: a guide / A.I. Paches. 5th ed., rev. and suppl. M.: Prakticheskaya Meditsina, 2013. P. 182–85
Global Cancer Obserbvatory. Cancer Today. URL:http://gco.iarc.fr
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Cancer of the Hypopharynx. Version 3.2019
T M Jones, M De et al., Laryngeal cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary guidelines. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (2016), 130 (Suppl. S2), S75–82
Fleming AJ, Jr., Smith SP, Jr., Paul CM, et al. Impact of [18F]-2- fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography on previously untreated head and neck cancer patients. Laryngoscope 2007;117:1173–79
Meulemans J, Delaere P, Vander Poorten V. Primary Treatment of T1-T2 Hypopharyngeal Cancer: Changing Paradigms. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2019;83:54-65
Tsou, Y.-A., Lin, M.-H., Hua, C.-H., et al. (2007). Survival outcome by early chemoradiation therapy salvage or early surgical salvage for the treatment of hypopharyngeal cancer. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, 137(5), 711–716
Thomas LD, Basavaiah M, Mehanna N, Jones H, Paleri V. Open Conservation partial Laryngectomy for laryngeal cancer: a Systematic review of English language literature. Cancer Treat Rev 2012;38:203–11
Bernier J, Domenge C, Ozsahin M, Matuszewska K, Lefebvre JL, Greiner RH, et al.: Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 1945–52
Blanchard P, Bourhis J, Lacas B, Posner MR, Vermorken JB, Hernandez JJ et al. Taxane cisplatin-fluorouracil as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancers: an individual patient data meta-analysis of the meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer group. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2854–60
Huang, P.-W., Lin, C.-Y., Hsieh, C.-H., et al. (2018). A phase II randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx or larynx. Biomedical Journal, 41(2), 129–136
Chen X, Xu J. Clinical analysis of cervical lymph node metastasis of hypopharyngeal carcinoma. 2011 Oct;25(19):891-4
Van der Laan HP, van de Water TA, van Herpt HE, et al. The potential of intensity-modulated proton radiotherapy to reduce swallowing dysfunction in the treatment of head and neck cancer: A planning comparative study // Acta Oncol. 2013. Vol. 52. P. 561-569
Ahn MJ, et al. Clinical recommendations for defining platinum unsuitable head and neck cancer patient populations on chemoradiotherapy: A literature review. Oral Oncol 2016; 53:10–6
Noronha V, Joshi A, Patil VM, et al. Once-a-week versus once-every-3 weeks cisplatin chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: a phase III randomized noninferiority trial. J Clin Oncol 2017: Jco2 017749457
Resolution of the Expert Council on the role of cetuximab in the treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head and Neck Tumors. 2019. No. 8. P. 71–3
Bolotina L.V., Vladimirova L.Yu., Dengina N.V., Novik A.V., Romanov I.S. Practical guidelines for the treatment of malignant tumors of the head and neck // Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines #3s2, 2018 (vol. 8). P. 71–82
Jae-Sook Ahn, Sang-Hee Cho, Ok-Ki Kim et al. The Efficacy of an Induction Chemotherapy Combination with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-FU Followed by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Cancer Res Treat. 2007 Sep; 39(3): 93–98
Vermorken J.B., Mesia R., Rivera F. et al. Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1116–27
Schöffski, P., Catimel, G., Planting et al. (1999). Docetaxel and cisplatin: An active regimen in patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Annals of Oncology, 10(1), 119–122
Gibson, M. K., Li, Y., Murphy, B., Hussain, M. H. A., DeConti, R. C., Ensley, J., & Forastiere, A. A. (2005). Randomized Phase III Evaluation of Cisplatin Plus Fluorouracil Versus Cisplatin Plus Paclitaxel in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer (E1395): An Intergroup Trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23(15), 3562–3567
Jacobs, C., Lyman, G., Velez-García, E. et al (1992). A phase III randomized study comparing cisplatin and fluorouracil as single agents and in combination for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 10(2), 257-263
Grau, J. josé, Caballero, M., et al (2009). Weekly paclitaxel for platin-resistant stage IV head and neck cancer patients. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 129(11), 1294–1299
Catimel, G., Verweij, J., Mattijssen, V., et al (1994). Docetaxel (Taxotere®): An active drug for the treatment of patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Annals of Oncology, 5(6), 533–537
Guardiola, E., Peyrade, F., Chaigneau, L. et al (2004). Results of a randomised phase II study comparing docetaxel with methotrexate in patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. European Journal of Cancer, 40(14), 2071–2076
Vermorken J.B., Trigo J., Hitt R. et al. Open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab as a single agent in patients with recurrent and or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck who failed to respond to platinum-based therapy. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:2171–7
Martinez-Trufero J., Isla D., Adansa J.C. et al. Phase II study of capecitabine as palliative treatment for patients with recurrent and metastatic squamous head and neck cancer after previous platinum-based treatment. Br J Cancer 2010;102:1687–91
Ferris R., Blumenschein G., Fayette J. et al. Nivolumab for recurrent squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2016;375:1856–67
Cohen E. E. W. et al. Pembrolizumab versus methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab for recurrent or metastatic head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (KEYNOTE-040): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study // The Lancet. – 2019. – Vol. 393. – No. 10167. – P. 156-167
Clarke P., Radford K., Coffey M., Stewart M. Speech and swallow rehabilitation in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol 2016;130(S2):S176–80
Sytov A.V., Leiderman I.N., Lomidze S.V., Nekhaev I.V., Khoteev A.Zh. Practical guidelines for nutritional support in cancer patients // Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines #3s2, 2018 (vol. 8). P. 575–583
Zhao, S. G., Alexander, N. B., Djuric, Z., et al (2015). Maintaining physical activity during head and neck cancer treatment: Results of a pilot controlled trial. Head & Neck, 38(S1), E1086–E1096
Segal R., Zwaal C., Green E. et al. Exercise for people with cancer: a systematic review. Curr Oncol. 2017 Aug; 24(4): e290–e31
Samuel S.R., Maiya G.A., Fernandes D.J. et al. Effectiveness of exercise-based rehabilitation on functional capacity and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients receiving chemo-radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2019
Mustian K.M., Alfano C.M., Heckler C. et al: Comparison of pharmaceutical, psychological, and exercise treatments for cancer-related fatigue: a meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:961–8
Kinkead B., Schettler P.J., Larson E.R. et al. Massage therapy decreases cancer-related fatigue: results from a randomized early phase trial. Cancer 2018;124(3):546–54
Streckmann F., Zopf E.M., Lehmann H.C. et al: Exercise intervention studies in patients with peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review. Sports Med 2014;44:1289–304
Rick O., von Hehn U., Mikus E. et al. Magnetic field therapy in patients with cytostatics-induced polyneuropathy: a prospective randomized placebo–controlled phase-III study. Bioelectromagnetics 2016:38(2):85–94
Ross M., Fischer-Cartlidge E. Scalp cooling: a literature review of efficacy, safety, and tolerability for chemotherapy-induced alopecia. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2017;21(2):226–33
Avci P., Gupta G.K., Clark J. et al. Low-level laser (light) therapy (LLLT) for treatment of hair loss. Lasers Surg Med 2013;46(2):144–51
Bensadoun R.J., Nair R.G. Low-level laser therapy in the management of mucositis and dermatitis induced by cancer therapy. Photomed Laser Surg 2015;33(10):487–91
Roopashri G. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy induced oral mucositis – prevention and current therapeutic modalities. IJDA 2010;2:174–9
Supportive Therapy in Oncology. A Practical Guide. Ed. by S.Yu. Moorcraft, D.L.Y. Lee, D. Cunningham. Transl. from English. Ed. by A.D. Kaprin. M.: Geotar, 2016. 432 p.
Rosenthal D.I., Trotti A. Strategies for managing radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2009;19:29–34, Pauloski B.R. Rehabilitation of dysphagia following head and neck cancer. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2008;9:889‒928
NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®). Cancer of the Hypopharynx. Version 1.2022
Bolotina L.V., Vladimirova L.Yu., Dengina N.V., Novik A.V., Romanov I.S. Practical guidelines for the treatment of malignant tumors of the head and neck // Malignant Tumors: RUSSCO Practical Guidelines #3s2, 2022 (vol. 12). P. 94–111.
Bourhis J, Sire C, Graff P, et al. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy versus acceleration of radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (GORTEC 99-02): an open-label phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:145- 153.
Tahara M, Kiyota N, Yokota T, et al. Phase II trial of combination treatment with paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab (PCE) as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (CSPOR-HN02). Ann Oncol 2018;29:1004-1009. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29408977.
Harari PM, Harris J, Kies MS, et al. Postoperative chemoradiotherapy and cetuximab for high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group RTOG-0234. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:2486-2495.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Anatoly M. Avanesov, MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of General and Clinical Dentistry, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, Senior Researcher at the Department of Surgery and Surgical Treatment Methods in Oncology, Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology of the Russian Ministry of Health
Aliyeva Sevil Bagaturovna, MD, DSc, Leading Researcher at the Department of Radiation Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Alymov Yuri Vladimirovich, MD, PhD, Oncologist, Postgraduate Student at the Department of Oncology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Russian Ministry of Health, Executive Director of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Anna V. Boyko, MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Radiation Therapy with Modification, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health
Mikhail V. Bolotin, PhD, Researcher at the Department of Surgical Oncology No. 11 of Upper Aerodigestive Tract Tumors, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the All-Russian Public Organization «Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists».
Larisa V. Bolotina, MD, PhD, Head of the Chemotherapy Department, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the All-Russian Public Organization «Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists».
Aleksey V. Butenko, MD, PhD, Professor, Chief Physician of the Research Institute of Clinical Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the All-Russian Public Organization «Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists».
Vyacheslav V. Vinogradov, MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Scientific and Clinical Department of Otorhinolaryngological Oncology, National Medical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngology of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia.
Lyubov Yu. Vladimirova, MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Drug Treatment of Tumors, National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health (Rostov-on-Don, Russia).
Nadezhda N. Volchenko, MD, PhD, Professor, Head of the Department of Oncomorphology, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Vitaly I. Voshedsky, PhD, Radiation Oncologist at the Department of Radiotherapy No. 2, National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health (Rostov-on-Don, Russia).
Artyom R. Gevorkov, PhD, Senior Researcher, Radiation Oncologist at the Department of Radiation Therapy with Modification, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the All-Russian Public Organization «Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists».
Tigran G. Gevorkyan, Deputy Director of the Research Institute of Clinical and Economic Research, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief Oncologist Specialist of the Moscow Region.
Aleksandr O. Guz, Head of the Head and Neck Tumors Department, Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Center of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, member of the All-Russian Public Organization «Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists» (Chelyabinsk, Russia).
Igor A. Gulidov, Head of the Radiation Therapy Department, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Nikolay A. Daikhes, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, MD, PhD, Professor, Director of the National Medical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngology of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia.
Dronova Ekaterina Leonidovna, Radiologist at the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Marina A. Engibaryan, MD, PhD, Head of the Head and Neck Tumors Department, National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the All-Russian Public Organization «Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists» (Rostov-on-Don, Russia).
Zharov Andrey Alexandrovich, Pathologist at the N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Mikhail S. Zinkovich, PhD, Radiation Oncologist at the Department of Radiotherapy No. 2, National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health (Rostov-on-Don, Russia).
Sergey A. Ivanov, MD, PhD, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director of the A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health
Anastasia V. Ignatova, PhD, Assistant at the Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Russian Ministry of Health, Assistant at the Department of General and Clinical Dentistry, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia.
Pavel A. Isaev, MD, DSc, Leading Researcher, Department of Radiation and Surgical Treatment of Head and Neck Diseases, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Anna L. Korniyetskaya, MD, PhD, Senior Researcher, Department of Chemotherapy, Division of Drug Treatment of Tumors, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Mikhail A. Kropotov, MD, DSc, Head of the Head and Neck Tumors Department, National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Denis E. Kulbakin, MD, DSc, Senior Researcher, Highest Qualification Category Oncologist, Head and Neck Tumors Department, Oncology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center.
Svetlana I. Kutukova, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery, Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Russian Ministry of Health; Oncologist, Chemotherapy Department No. 11, City Clinical Oncology Dispensary of Saint Petersburg; Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Aza A. Lyanova, MD, PhD, Chemotherapy Physician, Department of Antitumor Drug Therapy, National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health (Rostov-on-Don, Russia).
Olga A. Malikhova, MD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Endoscopy Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Ali M. Mudunov, MD, DSc, Professor, Head of Surgical Treatment Department No. 10 (Head and Neck Tumors), N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health; President of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Shamil I. Musin, MD, PhD, Head of the Head and Neck Tumors Department, Republican Clinical Oncological Dispensary, Ministry of Health of the Republic of Bashkortostan.
Mekhti N. Narimanov, MD, DSc, Chemotherapy Physician, Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Nevolskikh Alexey Alekseevich, MD, PhD, Deputy Director for Clinical Work, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center – branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Alexey V. Novik, MD, PhD, Senior Researcher, Research Department of Oncoimmunology, N.P. Napalkov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health; Physician at the Chemotherapy and Innovative Technologies Department, N.P. Napalkov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health; Associate Professor, Department of Oncology, Pediatric Oncology and Radiation Therapy, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, Russian Ministry of Health.
Olga A. Obukhova, MD, PhD, Senior Researcher, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health; Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Akgul A. Odzharova, MD, PhD, Leading Researcher, Positron Emission Tomography Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health; Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Sergey O. Podvyaznikov, MD, DSc, Professor, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Russian Ministry of Health; Vice-President of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Vyacheslav V. Polkin, MD, PhD, Head of the Department of Radiation and Surgical Treatment of Head and Neck Diseases, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Andrey P. Polyakov, MD, DSc, Head of the Microsurgery Department, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health; Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Zamira A. Radzhabova, MD, PhD, Head of the Surgical Department of Head and Neck Tumors, N.P. Napalkov National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health; Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Igor V. Reshetov, MD, DSc, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Plastic Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; President of the All-Russian Public Organization "Federation of Specialists in the Treatment of Head and Neck Diseases".
Sergey S. Reshulsky, MD, DSc, Head of the Head and Neck Tumors Department, National Medical Research Center for Otorhinolaryngology, Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia.
Ilya S. Romanov, MD, DSc, Senior Researcher, Head and Neck Tumors Department, Institute of Clinical Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Natalya A. Rubtsova, MD, DSc, Head of the Diagnostic Radiology Department, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health. Chief Freelance Specialist in Diagnostic and Instrumental Radiology of the Russian Ministry of Health in the Central Federal District of the Russian Federation.
Andrey N. Rudyk, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Oncology, Radiology and Palliative Medicine, Kazan State Medical Academy; Oncologist, Head and Neck Tumors Department, Prof. M.Z. Sigal Republican Clinical Oncological Dispensary of the Republic of Tatarstan.
Olga D. Ryzhova, Radiologist, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Tatyana Yu. Semiglazova, MD, DSc, Associate Professor, Head of the Research Department of Innovative Methods of Therapeutic Oncology and Rehabilitation, N.P. Napalkov National Medical Research Center of Oncology.
Anton V. Snegovoy, MD, DSc, Head of the Outpatient Chemotherapy Department (Day Hospital), N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health; Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Aleksandra M. Stepanova, Head of the Rehabilitation Department, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Vera A. Titova, MD, DSc, Professor, Russian Scientific Center of Roentgenoradiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Yulia V. Ulyanova, MD, PhD, Surgical Oncologist, Head and Neck Tumors Department, National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health (Rostov-on-Don, Russia).
Natalia A. Falaleeva, MD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Department of Drug Treatment of Malignant Neoplasms, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Alexander A. Fedenko, MD, DSc, Professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head of the Department of Drug Treatment of Tumors, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Elena V. Filonenko, Head of the Center for Laser and Photodynamic Diagnostics and Therapy of Tumors, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Zhanna V. Khaylova, MD, PhD, Deputy Director for Organizational and Methodological Work, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Evgeny V. Khmelevsky, MD, DSc, Professor, Head of the Radiation Therapy Department, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health; Radiation Oncologist, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, a branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Russian Ministry of Health.
Natalia A. Chertova, MD, PhD, Surgical Oncologist, Head and Neck Tumors Department, National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Russian Ministry of Health (Rostov-on-Don, Russia).
Evgeny L. Choynzonov, MD, DSc, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Director and Head of the Head and Neck Tumors Department, Oncology Research Institute, Tomsk National Research Medical Center; Head of the Department of Oncology, Siberian State Medical University, Russian Ministry of Health; Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Head and Neck Oncology Specialists".
Lilia P. Yakovleva, MD, PhD, Head of the Head and Neck Tumors Department, A.S. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center.
Conflict of interest:
All members of the Working Group have confirmed that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines: specialists with higher medical education in the following specialties:
Oncologists.
Surgeons.
Radiologists.
Medical students, residents, and postgraduate students.
In these clinical guidelines, all information is ranked by the level of reliability (evidence) depending on the quantity and quality of studies on the issue.
Table 1. Level of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive control by a reference standard, studies with a reference standard not independent of the evaluated method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | There is only a rationale for the mechanism of action or expert opinion |
Table 2. Scale for assessing levels of reliable evidence (LRE) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, rehabilitation interventions)
LoE | Definitions |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Grade of Recommendation (GoR) scale for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of evidence of proper quality; all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are not important, all studies have low methodological quality and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines
The update mechanism for clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision—at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based data regarding the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific conditions, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
These clinical guidelines have been developed taking into account the following regulatory and legal documents:
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 422an dated July 7, 2015, "On Approval of Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Medical Care".
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 915n dated November 15, 2012, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Adult Patients with Oncology".
Current package inserts for medicinal products mentioned in these clinical guidelines can be found at http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru.
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Flowchart for the diagnosis and treatment of a patient with hypopharyngeal cancer
Appendix C. Patient Information
Guidelines for post-treatment follow-up
Follow-up after completed treatment is essential for maintaining the patient's health. Typically, during the first 1–2 years, follow-up visits with an oncologist are recommended every 1–3 months, in the 2nd year every 2–6 months, and at 3–5 years every 4–8 months. After 5 years from the surgery, visits are conducted annually or upon the appearance of symptoms. Nevertheless, the frequency of doctor visits may be increased depending on the disease characteristics and associated risks, and is determined individually in each specific case. If any complaints arise or if symptoms present before treatment recur, it is necessary to consult a doctor immediately without waiting for the scheduled visit date.
The purpose of these visits is to monitor not only the oncological disease but also side effects, including delayed ones (e.g., hypothyroidism after neck radiation therapy, nutritional status decline, assessment of speech and swallowing functions, etc.).
Recommendations regarding lifestyle and nutrition should be individualized taking into account the extent of treatment received, the risks and severity of complications, and the patient's characteristics.
Benefits of quitting smoking and alcohol consumption
Higher survival rates
Higher treatment efficacy
Fewer and less severe side effects of antineoplastic treatment (cardiopulmonary complications, fatigue, weight loss, mucositis, loss of taste)
Accelerated recovery of general condition after treatment
Lower risk of recurrence
Lower risk of second primary tumors
Lower risk of infections
Higher quality of life
Recommendations for complications of chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy – contact your oncologist (chemotherapist, radiation oncologist)!
1) If body temperature rises to 38 °C or higher:
Start taking antibiotics as prescribed by your doctor.
2) For stomatitis:
Diet – mechanical and thermal sparing;
Frequent mouth rinsing (every hour) with chamomile, oak bark, or sage decoction; apply sea buckthorn (or peach) oil to the oral mucosa;
Treat the oral cavity as prescribed by the doctor.
3) For diarrhea:
Diet – exclude fatty, spicy, smoked, sweet, dairy products, and fiber.
Lean meat, flour products, fermented dairy products, and rice water are permitted. Drink plenty of fluids;
Take medications as prescribed by a physician.
4) For nausea:
Take medications as prescribed by a physician.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Appendix G1. WHO/ECOG Performance Status Scale
Russian title: WHO Patient Performance Status Scale/ECOG
Original title: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization Performance Status (ECOG/WHO PS)
Source (official developer website, validation publication): https://ecog-acrin.org/resources/ecog-performance-status
Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP: Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982, 5(6):649-655
Type: rating scale
Purpose: to describe the patient's level of functioning in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activities, and physical abilities (walking, work, etc.).
Contents:
Score | Description |
|---|---|
0 | Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction (90–100% on the Karnofsky scale) |
1 | Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (e.g., light housework, office work, 70–80% on the Karnofsky scale) |
2 | Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours (50–60% on the Karnofsky scale) |
3 | The patient is capable of only limited self-care, confined to a chair or bed for more than 50% of waking hours (30–40% on the Karnofsky scale) |
4 | Disabled, completely incapable of self-care, confined to a wheelchair or bed (10–20% on the Karnofsky scale) |
5 | Dead |
Key (interpretation): provided within the scale itself
Appendix G2. Questionnaire for initial patient presentation to a primary care physician within the framework of cancer awareness
Russian title: Questionnaire for the initial patient visit to a primary care physician within the framework of oncological alertness
Original title (if applicable): none
Source (official developer website, publication with
validation): https://oncology-association.ru/
Type (underline): questionnaire
Purpose: assessment of the probability of malignant neoplasms in a patient
Assessment tool, content:
Questionnaire for initial patient presentation to primary care physicians within the framework of oncological alertness (select correct answers, underline as appropriate, fill in if necessary)
Date of completion:
Full name:
1. Do you have occupational hazards at work?
1. No
2. Present
2. How many years do you work / have you worked with occupational hazards?
1. Up to 1 year
2. Up to 3 years
3. From 3 to 5 years
4. 6–10 years
5. More than 10 years
6. More than 15 years
3. Have any of your close relatives had or do they have cancer of the ENT organs?
1. No
2. Had or has
3. I don't know
4. Do you smoke (or have you smoked)?
1. No
2. Yes
3. More than 20 cigarettes a day
4. Smoking history less than 10 years
5. Smoking history 10–15 years
6. Smoking history more than 20 years
5. Have you noticed any weight loss recently?
1. No
2. I don't know
3. Yes, by more than 5 kg
4. Yes, I was on a diet
6. Are you troubled by increased weakness and fatigue, disproportionate to exertion?
1. No
2. More than 1 month
3. More than 6 months
7. Are you troubled by excessive generalized sweating, possibly worsening at night?
1. No
2. Yes, appeared within the last 6–12 months
3. Have always been troubled
8. Do you have pallor or skin discoloration?
1. No
2. Yes
3. I don't know
9. Have you recently noticed enlarged lymph nodes or other lumps in your neck?
1. No
2. Yes, painless
3. Yes, painful
10. Do you have any skin growths or long-standing non-healing ulcers on your face, scalp, or neck?
1. No
2. Yes
3. If yes, what specifically? (write in your options)
11. Have you recently noticed facial deformity due to newly appeared masses or swelling (changes in the shape of the nose, eyes, etc.)?
1. No
2. Yes
3. If yes, what specifically? (write in your options)
12. Are you bothered by a persistent cough or throat clearing?
1. No
2. Yes
3. With sputum
4. Blood-tinged
13. Are you bothered by hoarseness?
1. No
2. Periodically
3. Constantly over the last month
4. Yes, not evaluated and not treated
5. Yes, treatment received was ineffective
14. Are you troubled by difficulty breathing through the natural airways?
1. No
2. Sometimes
3. Frequently
4. Difficulty breathing is present at rest
5. With minor physical exertion
6. With significant physical exertion
15. Are you troubled by a "lump or foreign body sensation" in your throat?
1. No
2. Sometimes
3. Frequently or constantly
16. Are you troubled by an unpleasant taste in your mouth and/or bad breath?
1. No
2. Sometimes
3. Frequently or constantly
17. Are you troubled by difficulty swallowing food?
1. No
2. Yes, only liquids
3. Yes, only solid food
4. Swallowing is painful
5. Choking and coughing occur while eating
6. Within the last month
7. More than 3 months
18. Are you troubled by difficulty breathing through your nose?
1. No
2. Rarely
3. Frequently (constantly)
4. Nasal breathing difficulty on both sides
5. Nasal breathing difficulty on the right/left
6. Nasal breathing absent on both sides
7. Nasal breathing absent on the right/left
19. Rate your sense of smell:
1. Normal
2. Decreased
3. Absent
4. Bilaterally
5. Right/left
20. Do you experience nasal discharge and/or post-nasal drip?
1. No
2. Rarely
3. Frequently (constantly)
4. Mucous or clear
5. Purulent with an unpleasant odor
6. Blood-tinged
21. Do you feel any discomfort or pain in the facial area corresponding to the paranasal sinuses?
1. No
2. Rarely
3. Frequently (constantly)
22. Has any new growth appeared recently in the nasal cavity or throat?
1. No
2. Yes
3. Painless
4. Painful
5. Bleeding
Key (interpretation): Affirmative answers to questions 1 through 8, in the presence of symptoms described in questions 9 through 23, suggest a possible tumor disease; in such cases, a detailed examination by relevant specialists is required.