Kaposi sarcoma: clinical guidelines

Applies toadults2024 editionB21.0, C46.0, C46.1, C46.2…

Clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults. 2024 edition, ICD-10 codes: B21.0, C46.0, C46.1, C46.2…. This page features a abridged version by WhiteCoat Pro and the full official text.

Receive research articles on Kaposi sarcomaEvery morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in English, with figures, sample sizes, and conclusions. Plus updates on changes in Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary based on the 2024 guideline text. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

Kaposi sarcoma is an HHV-8-associated vascular tumor that most commonly affects the skin, but can also involve mucous membranes, lymph nodes, and internal organs. The guideline outlines disease recognition and morphological confirmation, evaluation of disease extent, and selection of local or systemic treatment taking into account the KS variant, HIV status, immunosuppression, and the patient's general condition.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Physical examination for classic KS typically reveals single or bilateral bluish-red macules 1–5 cm in diameter on the skin of the distal lower extremities; these lesions then slowly grow, transforming into firm papules, plaques, and nodules, large nodules may darken and ulcerate, and edema with lymphedema phenomena may occur at the periphery of the nodules. → in text
  2. Perform dermoscopy of all skin integuments and suspicious elements. Target features: bluish-red coloration, "rainbow pattern", scaly surface, and small brown globules. Level of Evidence C, Grade of Recommendation 4. → in text
  3. Perform skin biopsy with pathomorphological examination of the biopsy or surgical specimen to confirm the diagnosis. Level of Evidence C, Grade of Recommendation 5. → in text
  4. Determine IgM and HIV-1/HIV-2 IgG antibodies in all patients to rule out association with HIV infection; blood testing for specific antibodies to HHV-8 is recommended for all patients with HIV-associated KS. Level of Evidence C, Grade of Recommendation 5. → in text
  5. Assess the extent of the disease and perform staging. In case of dissemination, suspected visceral involvement, or symptoms from the gastrointestinal, respiratory, or skeletal systems, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, bronchoscopy, abdominal MRI, chest CT, or contrast-enhanced PET/CT are performed as indicated. Level of Evidence C, Grade of Recommendation 4. → in text
  6. In HIV-associated KS, CD4+ count, systemic symptoms, and general condition according to the Karnofsky scale are taken into account; "B" symptoms include unexplained fever, night sweats, weight loss of more than 10%, or diarrhea lasting more than 2 weeks. → in text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

How to confirm the diagnosis of Kaposi sarcoma?

Clinical and dermoscopic features help suspect KS, but the diagnosis is confirmed by pathomorphological examination of biopsy or surgical skin material. Level of Evidence C, Grade of Recommendation 5. → in text

Is it necessary to screen a KS patient for HIV and HHV-8?

Yes. IgM and HIV-1/HIV-2 IgG antibodies are determined in all patients; blood testing for specific antibodies to HHV-8 is recommended for all patients with HIV-associated KS. Level of Evidence C, Grade of Recommendation 5. → in text

How to treat localized Kaposi sarcoma?

For well-demarcated superficial lesions, serial surgical excision with margin control is recommended. In case of positive margins, repeat intervention is advisable; for extensive lesions, surgical treatment should not be considered as the primary option. → in text

What systemic therapy is used for disseminated KS?

The guideline specifies liposomal doxorubicin 20 mg/m² every 3 weeks, paclitaxel 80 mg/m² weekly or 100 mg/m² every 2 weeks, and pomalidomide 5 mg from days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. In case of progression, pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 21 days is an option. → in text

What to do in case of KS in a patient after transplantation or on immunosuppression?

When KS is detected in patients receiving immunosuppressants, it is recommended to adjust the dose and/or regimen of immunosuppressive therapy. → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
238, edition 2 (ID 238_2)
Publication date
August 14, 2024
Age category
adults
ICD-10 codes
B21.0C46.0C46.1C46.2C46.3C46.7C46.8C46.9
Specialties
OncologyDermatovenereology
Developers
Association of Oncologists of Russia
All-Russian Public Organization "Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists"
Autonomous Non-Profit Organization "East European Sarcoma Group"
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Rubricator — 238_2

Abridged Clinical Guidelines: Kaposi sarcoma

The abridged version of this guideline by WhiteCoat Pro is 182 pages long: each section of the document is summarized concisely in plain language, complete with tests and fill-in-the-blanks for self-assessment. Essential when you need not just to read the guideline, but to learn it for an exam, accreditation, or clinical practice.
All abbreviated guidelines: 290
Beginning of abbreviated version — open

1.1 Definition of the disease: Kaposi sarcoma

Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is a locally aggressive endothelial proliferation.

Classification (WHO):

  • Belongs to the section of vascular tumors.

Etiology and pathogenesis:

  • The disease is always associated with HHV8 infection (human herpesvirus type 8).
  • It represents an example of virus-induced vascular proliferation.

Clinical presentation and localization:

  • Skin:
  • Most frequently affected.
  • Manifestations: multiple macules, plaques, or nodules.
  • Other localizations:
  • Mucous membranes.
  • Lymph nodes.
  • Internal organs.
  • Important: Involvement of mucous membranes, lymph nodes, and internal organs can occur without skin lesions.
  • Rare localizations:
  • Brain.
  • Bones.
  • Occur rarely even in disseminated disease.

Etiology

  • Causative agent: Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) / Kaposi sarcoma herpes virus (KSHV).
  • Taxonomy:
  • Subfamily: Gammaherpesvirinae.
  • Genus: Rhadinovirus.
  • Localization: Detected in endothelial cells in all forms of the disease. It is a DNA virus.

Genetic variants of HHV-8

Based on differences in nucleotide sequences, 3 variants are distinguished:

  • Variant A: Associated with classical Kaposi sarcoma (KS) and AIDS-associated skin and internal organ lesions.
  • Variants B and C: Associated with lymphoproliferative disorders (lymphomas, generalized lymphadenopathies, Castleman disease).

Pathogenesis and viral life cycle

Gene expression depends on the stage of infection (latent or lytic).

  • The viral genome exists as an episome.
  • Products of 3 key viral genes are expressed:
  • ORF 72 (viral cyclin D): inhibits apoptosis of infected cells.
  • ORF 73 (LANA-1 — Latent Nuclear Antigen):
  • Promotes virus spread and transcription (attaches HHV-8 DNA to chromatin histone H1).
  • Inhibits transcriptional activity of p53 (tumor suppressor).
  • Acts as a latent nuclear antigen.
  • K13 (vFLIP):
  • Protects cells from apoptosis by blocking the Fas receptor.
  • Protects against destruction by cytotoxic T lymphocytes.
  • Initiation: Triggered by the ORF 50 (RTA) gene product.
  • Process: Gene products are produced in an ordered sequence.
  • Prevalence in the body:
  • In KS lesions: up to 10% of viruses are in the lytic phase.
  • In peripheral blood lymphocytes: detected, as a rule, only in severe immunosuppression (AIDS-associated type).
  • Replication reservoir: Oropharynx. Saliva contains a high number of virus copies.

Epidemiology and course features

  • Route of transmission: Predominantly sexual.
  • Prevalence: HHV-8 DNA is detected in >95% of cases of all forms of KS (AIDS-related and non-AIDS-related).
  • Immune response: Antibodies to nuclear antigens (LANA) appear in peripheral blood before clinical manifestations.
  • Clinical significance:
  • Most primary infections are asymptomatic.
  • Not all seropositive individuals develop KS.
  • Conclusion: The presence of HHV-8 is a necessary but insufficient condition for the development of KS. A complex interaction of genetic, immunological, and environmental factors is required.
The official full text of the guideline below remains open and free. Only the condensed study version as a whole is paid: section-by-section explanations, self-assessment tests, and integration with platform materials.

List of Abbreviations

HIV – human immunodeficiency virus

WHO – World Health Organization

IU – International Unit

GI – gastrointestinal tract

ICD – International Classification of Diseases

ICD-10 – International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision

KS – Kaposi sarcoma

AIDS – acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

HHV-8 (human herpesvirus 8) – human herpesvirus type 8

LANA-1 (latency-associated nuclear antigen-1) – latency-associated nuclear antigen-1

ORF (open reading frame) – open reading frame

vFLIP (viral FLICE-inhibitory protein) – viral FLICE-inhibitory protein

** – vital and essential drugs

# – a drug used not in accordance with the approved indications, contraindications, routes of administration, or dosages contained in the product leaflet (off-label)

Terms and Definitions

Kaposi sarcoma is a multicentric neoplastic process developing from the endothelium of blood and lymphatic vessels, predominantly affecting the skin and involving internal organs.

HHV-8 (human herpesvirus 8) is a gammaherpesvirus associated with Kaposi sarcoma.

ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) scale: a 5-point grading system recommended by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group for assessing the general condition of a cancer patient before, during, and after treatment.

PD-1 inhibitor – a monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor and its ligands.

Prehabilitation – rehabilitation from the moment of diagnosis until the start of treatment (surgery/chemotherapy/radiation therapy).

First stage of rehabilitation – rehabilitation during the specialized treatment of the underlying disease (including surgery/chemotherapy/radiation therapy) in departments of medical organizations specialized in the primary disease profile.

Second stage of rehabilitation – rehabilitation in inpatient settings of medical organizations (rehabilitation centers, rehabilitation departments) during the early recovery period, late rehabilitation period, or the period of residual effects of the disease.

Third stage of rehabilitation – rehabilitation during the early and late rehabilitation periods and the period of residual effects of the disease in departments (rooms) for rehabilitation, physiotherapy, exercise therapy, reflexology, manual therapy, psychotherapy, medical psychology, and speech therapy (defectology) providing outpatient medical care, day care settings, as well as by mobile teams at home (including in sanatorium-resort organizations).

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

According to the WHO definition, Kaposi sarcoma is a locally aggressive endothelial proliferation that typically manifests as cutaneous lesions in the form of multiple macules, plaques, or nodules, but may also involve mucosal sites, lymph nodes, and internal organs. KS is always associated with HHV-8 infection and represents an example of virus-induced vascular proliferation. According to the WHO classification, it belongs to the category of vascular tumors.

The skin is most frequently affected. Mucosal membranes, lymph nodes, and internal organs may also be involved, sometimes without cutaneous lesions. Involvement of the brain and bones is rare, even in disseminated disease [1, 13, 14, 71–77].

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

The cause of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is human herpesvirus type 8 (HHV-8, KSHV – Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus), which belongs to the subfamily Gammaherpesvirinae, genus Rhadinovirus.

HHV-8 is subdivided into three variants: A, B, and C, based on nucleotide sequence differences in genome subsegments.

Variant A is associated with classical KS and AIDS-related skin and internal organ lesions, while variants B and C are associated with lymphoproliferative disorders (lymphomas, generalized lymphadenopathies, Castleman disease).

Like other herpesviruses, gene expression depends on the stage of infection: latent or lytic. During latent infection, the HHV-8 genome exists as an episome and expresses the products of 3 viral genes: ORF 72 (viral cyclin D, which inhibits apoptosis of infected cells), ORF 73 (LANA-1), and K13 (vFLIP). LANA-1 promotes viral dissemination and transcription in cells by attaching HHV-8 DNA to chromatin H1 histone. LANA-1 inhibits the transcriptional activity of p53, while vFLIP protects latently HHV-8-infected cells from apoptosis by blocking the Fas receptor and destruction by cytotoxic T lymphocytes. The product of the ORF 50 gene (RTA) initiates the lytic phase of the HHV-8 life cycle. Following the initiation of lytic replication, gene products are synthesized in an ordered sequence typical of other human herpesviruses. It has been established that up to 10% of HHV-8 viruses detected in KS lesions are in the lytic phase; however, HHV-8 in peripheral blood lymphocytes is generally detected only in patients with marked immunosuppression (AIDS-associated and immunosuppressive disease types). The oropharynx is the reservoir for the most pronounced viral replication; saliva contains a large number of HHV-8 copies.

HHV-8 (KS-associated herpesvirus) is detected in endothelial cells in all forms of the disease; it is a DNA virus that encodes the latent nuclear antigen, a product of the viral gene ORF73.

Sequencing revealed a correlation between HHV-8 genetic variants and patient populations (Europe, Africa, North America). HHV-8 is transmitted mainly through sexual contact. HHV-8 DNA is detected in all forms of KS (>95% of AIDS-related and non-AIDS-related KS). Antibodies against HHV-8 nuclear antigens appear early, prior to the clinical manifestations of KS, and can be detected in the peripheral blood. Not all HHV-8 infections lead to clinical manifestations of KS, and the majority of primary infections are asymptomatic. Not all seropositive individuals develop KS. The presence of HHV-8 infection is necessary but not sufficient for the development of KS, which results from a complex interaction of genetic, immunological, and environmental factors.

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

The incidence of the classical form of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) varies significantly across different geographical regions, ranging from 0.14 per 1 million inhabitants (both men and women) to 10.5 per 1 million men and 2.7 per 1 million women. Men are affected 3 times more often. The onset of KS is recorded at 35–39 years of age in men and 25–39 years of age in women. Men are affected 3–10 times more often. The onset of KS is recorded at 50–70 years of age [1, 2]. A higher incidence of KS is observed in countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea and in Central Africa (endemic Kaposi sarcoma). In developed countries among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)–1 infected patients, HHV-8 detectability is highest among gay and bisexual men.

Transplant-associated KS is observed following organ transplantation, predominantly kidney transplantation. KS may also develop in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy for autoimmune diseases [3, 4]. Kaposi sarcoma is the most common AIDS-defining tumor in men who have sex with men and is observed in 20% of AIDS patients.

One of the main routes of transmission of HHV-8 is sexual, with the risk of infection increasing with the number of sexual partners and practice of non-traditional sexual contacts. The non-sexual mechanism of viral transmission via saliva is widely recognized and plays an important role in infecting children in endemic areas. The vertical transmission route of HHV-8 from mother to foetus during pregnancy and childbirth is not of major importance for viral dissemination. HHV-8 can also be transmitted via blood, blood products, and donor organs following transplantation. The HHV-8 viral genome is detected in all KS lesions across all disease stages regardless of the clinical variant [1]. The virus is widespread in the population: from approximately 1–3% of blood donors in North America to up to 70% in regions of Africa where HHV-8 is endemic; 90% of HIV-infected individuals have antibodies to HHV-8 lytic proteins, and serum antibodies to this virus were detected in 9.6% of healthy donors in Russia. The prevalence of HHV-8 infection roughly reflects the prevalence of KS.

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

According to the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (hereinafter referred to as ICD-10), such tumors are classified according to the organ of primary origin.

Kaposi sarcoma (C46, B21.0)

C46.0 – KS of skin

C46.1 – KS of soft tissue

C46.2 – KS of palate

C46.3 – KS of lymph nodes

C46.7 – KS of other sites

C46.8 – KS of multiple organs

C46.9 – KS, unspecified

B21.0 – HIV disease resulting in Kaposi sarcoma

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

International Histological Classification (WHO Classification of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone, 5th edition, 2020):

according to the ICD-O morphological code 9140/3 [16, 17]

− classical KS (idiopathic, sporadic, European);

− endemic KS (African);

− epidemic KS associated with AIDS;

− immunosuppression-associated KS (iatrogenic, occurring during immunosuppressive therapy, particularly after organ transplantation).

There is no universally accepted staging classification for classical, endemic, and immunosuppression-associated variants of Kaposi sarcoma.

It is recommended to distinguish 3 clinical situations: 1) locally advanced non-aggressive form, 2) locally advanced aggressive form, and 3) disseminated form of KS [1, 2, 14, 77].

Comment: The only approved and validated staging system for AIDS-related KS. It was developed by the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Oncology Committee in the pre-combination antiretroviral therapy era and included measuring the extent of disease (T - tumor) as localized or disseminated; the state of the immune system (I - immunodeficiency) based on CD4 cell count (high or low); and the presence or absence of symptoms and systemic diseases (S - systemic diseases/conditions) [1, 2, 3, 16]. In the post-combination antiretroviral therapy era, only T and S are recommended to identify patients with a poor prognosis (Table 1).

Table 1. Staging classification of AIDS-related KS [1, 2, 3]

Factor

Good prognosis

(all factors)

Poor prognosis

(one of the factors)

Tumor, T

T0: Confined to skin and/or lymph nodes and/or minimal oral cavity involvement (non-nodular KS)

T1: Tumor-associated edema or ulceration

Extensive oral cavity KS

Gastrointestinal KS

KS of other visceral organs excluding lymph nodes

Immune system, I1

I0: CD4+ cells > 150/mL

I1: CD4+ cells < 150/mL

Systemic states/diseases, S

S0: No history of opportunistic infections or aphthous stomatitis

No "B" symptoms2

Karnofsky performance status > 70

S1: History of opportunistic infections or aphthous stomatitis

Presence of "B" symptoms2

Karnofsky performance scale < 70

Other HIV-associated diseases (neurological diseases, lymphoma)

1 - currently this parameter has less clinical significance given the availability of antiretroviral therapy

2 - unexplained fever, night sweats, involuntary weight loss > 10%, or diarrhea lasting > 2 weeks.

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

Classic (idiopathic) KS

The typical localization of lesions in the idiopathic variant of KS is the skin of the distal lower extremities. It is characterized by the appearance of symmetric or asymmetric bluish-red macules, prone to peripheral and gradual vertical growth. In most cases, the course is subjectively asymptomatic. With KS progression, macular elements sequentially transform into papular and plaque forms, and less frequently, nodular forms. Neoplasms grow slowly, without subjective sensations; some may remain unchanged in size for years, although rapidly progressing forms are also described. Pain may appear after 2-10 years upon ulceration of the nodules. Progression of KS is accompanied by dissemination of skin lesions and rarely by metastasis to the lymph nodes and gastrointestinal mucosa [1].

Endemic (African) KS

It predominantly affects children and young adults, and is characterized by a more "aggressive" and fulminant course. This may be accompanied by the appearance of numerous painful subcutaneous nodules and ulcers, along with internal organ dysfunction.

AIDS-related KS

This form is characterized by either a rapid or indolent course, depending on the level of HIV control. Initially, rashes appear on the scalp (nose, eyelids, auricles) and trunk. The rashes are initially painless, later becoming painful and leading to impaired organ function.

Depending on the localization of the process, both localized and disseminated forms occur.

The clinical picture is characterized by a symptom complex of the affected zones: skin manifestations, or involvement of visceral organs or mucous membranes.

Immunosuppression-associated KS

Skin rashes are limited in character and asymptomatic. Subsequently, the spread of rashes is accompanied by the formation of nodules and their ulceration, leading to intense local pain and resembling the manifestations of AIDS-related KS. Reducing the dose or discontinuing immunosuppressive drugs leads to complete regression of skin and visceral manifestations of KS in 24–80% of patients, although resuming their use leads to disease relapse.

Clinical manifestations of various KS subtypes are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2. Clinical manifestations of KS [6, 14, 17–21, 71–77].

KS Variant

Skin Involvement

Mucosal Involvement

Visceral Organ Involvement

Lymph Node Involvement

Classic / Endemic KS

Indolent, predominantly on the extremities

<5% [1, 2]

<10% [3]

<10% [3]

AIDS-related KS

More widespread and extensive [3]

30-40% [4]

20-40%  [3, 4]

25% [3, 4]

Post-transplant KS

More widespread and extensive [5]

20% [5]

20-50% [5]

20-40% [5]

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

The course and severity of clinical symptoms depend on the disease variant. Subjective clinical manifestations of Kaposi sarcoma are described in the "Clinical Presentation" section.

2.2 Physical Examination

Classic (idiopathic) KS (no gender differences)

Criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition: based on pathognomonic physical examination findings:

- single or bilateral bluish-red macules 1–5 cm in diameter with distinct borders, resembling a hematoma, appear on the skin of the distal lower extremities;

- then the elements grow slowly, transforming into firm papules (forming plaques upon coalescence) and nodules;

- large nodules on the lower extremities darken (due to hemosiderin deposition) and ulcerate, causing sloughing of necrotic tissues;

- pronounced edema with lymphedema phenomena is observed at the periphery of the nodules (fibrotic areas form subsequently);

- spread of rashes to other areas of the body, lymph nodes, oral and genital mucosa, and internal organs (often with an asymptomatic course);

- death in classic KS most often results from other causes, as the disease is observed in elderly individuals and typically progresses slowly.

Endemic (African) KS

Criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition: based on pathognomonic physical examination findings:

- KS manifests in nodular, "florid", infiltrative, and lymphadenopathic variants;

- the "florid", vegetative, and infiltrative variants are characterized by a more aggressive course with deep involvement of the dermis, subcutaneous tissue, muscles, and bones;

- African KS can affect children, young adults, and adults. In adults, there is a male predisposition, whereas in children, there is no sex predilection. The skin and mucous membranes are affected to a lesser extent. In adulthood, internal organ involvement is frequently observed, while in children, lymph nodes and internal organs are primarily affected. It can have a fulminant course with very rapid progression.

Epidemic KS (AIDS-related)

Criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition: based on pathognomonic physical examination findings:

- A rapid course with multifocal dissemination is characteristic;

- Initial manifestations of KS on the face are more frequently observed on the skin of the nose, eyelids, and auricles; on the trunk, they occur along skin tension lines;

- In the absence of treatment, disseminated lesions may coalesce to form large plaques spreading to the skin of the face, trunk, or extremities, which frequently leads to organ dysfunction;

- The oral mucosa is affected in 10-15% of patients. Eruptions are most typically localized in the hard and soft palate and the base of the tongue, where they rapidly ulcerate;

- Pharyngeal involvement is frequently observed and may lead to difficulty in eating, speaking, and breathing;

- The stomach and duodenum are common sites of KS localization, and the disease is frequently accompanied by bleeding and intestinal obstruction;

- In the pulmonary form of KS, respiratory symptoms may be observed: bronchospasm, cough, and progressive respiratory failure.

Immunosuppression-associated KS

Criteria for establishing the diagnosis/condition: based on pathognomonic physical examination findings: develops after internal organ transplantation and is caused by the iatrogenic effect of immunosuppressants (L04A);

- Skin manifestations initially have a localized character, then spread and resemble the rashes of epidemic KS.

Reduction of the dose or discontinuation of immunosuppressants (L04A) leads to complete regression of skin and visceral manifestations of KS in 24-80% of patients; however, resumption of their use leads to a recurrence of the disease.

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

Diagnosis of KS is based on physical examination data—identifying typical manifestations for the respective stages of KS; dermoscopy reveals a bluish-reddish coloration, a "rainbow pattern", a scaly surface, and small brown globules. The diagnosis is confirmed by pathomorphological examination of biopsy (surgical) material. Considering the high frequency of association of the disease with AIDS, serological testing for HIV is necessary. If KS is suspected, screening for specific antibodies to HHV-8 is indicated.

In disseminated forms, additional laboratory and instrumental examinations are indicated to assess visceral manifestations of KS.

It is recommended to perform a pathomorphological examination of skin biopsy (surgical) material to confirm the diagnosis [1, 14].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5).

Comments: Pathomorphological examination distinguishes angiomatous, fibroblastic, and mixed variants of KS. Macular lesions show an increase in the number of dermal vessels surrounded by endothelial cells, with adjacent areas containing hemosiderin deposits and extravasated erythrocytes with a moderate perivascular infiltrate. In KS plaques, pronounced vascular proliferation is detected in all structures of the dermis, including collagen fibers. The presence of dense bundles and spindle cells between jagged vascular cells is characteristic. In the nodules of KS patients, predominantly spindle cells, areas of angiomatosis, and dense sarcomatous fibers are determined. The inflammatory infiltrate consists of lymphocytes, histiocytes, and plasma cells. Immunohistochemically, KS reveals the expression of vascular markers CD31, CD34, and the lymphatic marker D2-40 (podoplanin) [1].

It is recommended that all patients undergo determination of antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 in the blood and determination of antibodies of classes M, G (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 in the blood to rule out association with HIV infection [14, 45].

GRC CLE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5).

It is recommended that all patients with HIV-associated KS undergo blood testing for the presence of specific antibodies to HHV-8 [14, 45].

GGR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5).

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

It is recommended to examine all skin surfaces and lesions suspicious for Kaposi sarcoma in all patients under magnification (dermoscopy) for initial diagnosis [39].

GCR CLEL 4Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence 4).

Comments: dermoscopy of KS reveals the following dermoscopic features: bluish-red coloration (in 84% of lesions), "rainbow pattern" (36%), scaly surface, and small brown globules (15%). The multicolored rainbow pattern is the most significant dermoscopic pattern detected by a polarized dermatoscope. The rainbow pattern is not observed in other vascular neoplasms.

It is recommended that all patients with Kaposi sarcoma undergo examination in accordance with Table 4 for staging and assessing the extent of KS. In disseminated forms or when visceral KS involvement is suspected, in the presence of symptoms of gastrointestinal, respiratory, or skeletal system involvement, the following examinations are performed as indicated: esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, bronchoscopy, magnetic resonance imaging of the abdominopelvic organs, computed tomography of the chest organs, positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography using tumorotropic radiopharmaceuticals with contrast enhancement [14, 45, 71–76].

GGR CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4)

2.5 Other Procedures

It is recommended that all patients diagnosed with any form of KS consult an oncologist to determine treatment tactics [43].

GGR CLOE 4Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 4).

It is recommended to prescribe antiretroviral therapy to all patients with Kaposi sarcoma and HIV [14, 77].

GGR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

General treatment comments

Treatment methods for Kaposi sarcoma depend on the clinical form of the disease, the size of the lesions, and the organs and/or systems involved in the pathological process, as well as the patient's WHO/ECOG performance status.

Despite the proven role of oncogenic herpesvirus infection caused by HHV-8 in the pathogenesis of Kaposi sarcoma, J05AB nucleosides and nucleotides, other than reverse transcriptase inhibitors (antiherpetic agents), are not used due to their low efficacy [49].

It is recommended that when KS is detected in patients receiving L04A immunosuppressants, the dose and/or regimen of immunosuppressants should be adjusted [14, 49, 52, 77].

GGR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5).

3.1. Surgical treatment

It is recommended for the treatment of localized KS to perform sequential surgical excision of limited KS lesions, which allows disease control for many years [1].

Level of Recommendations CLevel of Evidence 5Level of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comments It must be taken into account that due to the high recurrence rate, this procedure should be performed for well-demarcated and superficial tumors. This treatment option should not be considered as primary for extensive lesions. The principles of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery should be applied with adequate margins and plastic surgery stages as needed. Surgical margins should be evaluated. In case of positive margins, re-operation is advisable. When single lesions are located in complex anatomical areas (face, hand), surgical excision with intraoperative margin assessment should be preferred.

3.2. Medical treatment

It is recommended for the treatment of disseminated forms of KS (including visceral involvement) to administer systemic therapy for classical KS:

#doxorubicin** 20 mg/m2 (liposomal) every 3 weeks, treatment duration is determined by achieving the maximum effect followed by 2 consolidation courses of chemotherapy [14, 15, 45, 77].

GGR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

It is recommended for the treatment of disseminated forms of KS

#Paclitaxel** 80 mg/m² weekly or 100 mg/m² every 2 weeks until response is achieved, under the control of laboratory and functional parameters [14, 15, 45, 77, 84-86].

GGR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence 5)

It is recommended for the treatment of disseminated forms of KS:

#pomalidomide** 5 mg once daily from days 1 to 21, cycle every 28 days [47, 48, 77]

GGR BLEL 3Grade of Recommendations B (Level of Evidence 3)

Comments: In clinical trials of #pomalidomide**, a dose of 5 mg/day was also used as first-line therapy. However, #pomalidomide** is supplied in a 4 mg dose, and the expert co-authors of the clinical guidelines for KS treatment, as well as NCCN experts, consider 4 mg to be a sufficient dose [54, 77].

It is recommended to administer therapy with interferon alfa-2b** in the presence of contraindications to chemotherapy and/or for non-aggressive, non-HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma:

# Interferon alfa-2b** – 3 or 6 million IU subcutaneously 3 times a week – 6 months [14, 82]

GGR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence 5)

It is not recommended to use specific antiherpetic drugs: J05AB nucleosides and nucleotides, excluding reverse transcriptase inhibitors, and J05AF nucleosides and nucleotides – reverse transcriptase inhibitors [15, 45]

GGR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence 5)

It is recommended to use the following regimens as second-line or subsequent-line therapy:

1) #gemcitabine** 1000 mg/m² IV on day 1 and day 8, cycle every 21 days or 1200 mg IV on day 1 and day 8, cycle every 21 days [2, 14, 26, 77, 80, 81]

GGR CLEL 4Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence 4)

2) Etoposide** 50 mg orally daily for 7 days, cycle of 14 days; after 2 cycles, if tolerability is satisfactory, dose escalation to 100 mg p.o. daily for 7 days is possible, cycle every 14 days [14, 28, 77]

GCR CLOCE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comments: for the treatment of patients with Kaposi's sarcoma, the dose of etoposide** is established individually, depending on the line of therapy, the patient's hematological parameters, and the patient's age. Due to the rare incidence, most drug therapy studies have been conducted in the population of patients with HIV infection, where KS is more common, but chemotherapy efficacy data are also used for patients without HIV. The indicated doses only partially correspond to the package insert for oral etoposide** registered in the Russian Federation.

3) #Imatinib** 400 mg daily p.o. long-term for up to 12 months of therapy with a possible dose increase to 600 mg/day after 3 months if disease stabilization is noted. [24, 29, 77]

GGR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comment: this regimen was studied in a phase II trial for patients with HIV-associated Kaposi's sarcoma; the expert community believes that these data can be extrapolated to patients with KS without HIV due to the rare occurrence of this nosological entity. This is confirmed by the inclusion of this treatment option in the NCCN guidelines.

GGR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence 5)

It is recommended to use monotherapy with PD-1 blocking monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of disseminated forms of Kaposi's sarcoma upon progression:

# pembrolizumab** 200 mg IV infusion once every 21 days, long-term [60-62, 77].

GCR CLEL 4Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence 4)

3.3. Other local treatment options

Recommended for the treatment of localized forms of SS only in the presence of contraindications to surgical treatment or the impossibility of its performance:

Cryodestruction of KS skin lesions [6, 14, 77, 83]

LeR CLoE 5Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended for the treatment of locally advanced forms of KS without visceral manifestations:

Application radiation therapy with the production and application of individual applicators. 3D-4D planning, Intraoperative radiation therapy, Conformal external beam radiation therapy, Conformal external beam radiation therapy with neutron, proton and heavy ion beams [51]

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence 5)

Comments: the choice of radiation type and fields depends on the localization and number of KS lesions.

Radiation therapy is one of the most effective local treatment methods and is used to treat all variants of locally advanced KS. The response rate to radiation therapy ranges from 47% to 99% [1-8, 31-38]. Recommended radiation therapy doses are 30-30 Gy at 2-3 Gy daily. Doses exceeding 3 Gy per fraction combined with systemic therapy should be avoided to reduce the risk of late complications.

The use of radiation therapy should be discussed at a multidisciplinary tumor board. Radiotherapy for lesions localized on the plantar surface of the foot and palmar surface of the hand is limited by side effects. In all cases, radiotherapy should be considered when systemic therapy is ineffective and surgery is not feasible.

It is recommended to use local treatment for localized KS in unresectable cases:

#Imiquimod (5%) on KS lesions, 3 times a week, for at least 16 weeks [9, 14, 45, 53, 77-79]. Grade of Recommendations C (Level of Evidence 5)

3.4 Pain Management

The principles of pain management and the optimal selection of analgesic therapy in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma with chronic pain syndrome comply with the pain management principles outlined in the clinical guidelines "Chronic Pain Syndrome in Adult Patients Requiring Palliative Medical Care".

3.5 Concomitant therapy in patients with Kaposi sarcoma

The principles of prevention and treatment of anemia in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma comply with the principles outlined in the clinical guidelines "Anemia in Malignant Neoplasms", available in the rubricator of clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru

The principles of treatment and prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma comply with the principles outlined in the guidelines "Prevention and Treatment of Nausea and Vomiting". Authors: Vladimirova L.Yu., Gladkov O.A., Koroleva I.A., Rumyantsev A.A., Semiglazova T.Yu., Tryakin A.A. et al. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-2-29-44, https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/RUSSCO/2023/2023-38.pdf

The principles of treatment and prevention of bone complications in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma comply with the principles outlined in the guidelines "Bone Pathology". Authors: Bagrova S.G., Basin E.M., Borzov K.A., Bychkova N.M., Dengina N.V., Kopp M.V., Krylov V.V., Kochetova T.Yu., Semiglazova T.Yu. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-2-44-59. https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/RUSSCO/2023/2023-39.pdf

The principles of prevention and treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma comply with the principles outlined in the guidelines "Febrile Neutropenia". Authors: Sakaeva D.D., Borisov K.E., Bulavina I.S., Kogonia L.M., Kurmukov I.A., Orlova R.V., Shabaeva M.M. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-2-60-68. https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/RUSSCO/2023/2023-40.pdf

The principles of prevention and treatment of hepatotoxicity in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma comply with the principles outlined in the guidelines "Hepatotoxicity". Authors: Tkachenko P.E., Ivashkin V.T., Maevskaya M.V. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-2-69-82. https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/RUSSCO/2023/2023-41.pdf

The principles of prevention and treatment of cardiovascular complications in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma comply with the principles outlined in the guidelines "Cardiovascular Toxicity". Authors: Vitsenya M.V., Ageev F.T., Orlova R.V., Poltavskaya M.G., Potievskaya V.I. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-2-83-107. https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/RUSSCO/2023/2023-42.pdf

The principles of prevention and treatment of skin complications in patients with Kaposi's sarcoma comply with the principles outlined in the guidelines "Dermatological Reactions". Authors: Koroleva I.A., Bolotina L.V., Gladkov O.A., Gorbunova V.A., Kogonia L.M., Kruglova L.S., Orlova E.V., Orlova R.V. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-2-108-131. https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/RUSSCO/2023/2023-43.pdf

The principles of nutritional support in patients with Kaposi sarcoma correspond to the principles outlined in the clinical guidelines "Nutritional Support". Authors: Sytov A.V., Zuzov S.A., Kukosh M.Yu., Leiderman I.N., Obukhova O.A., Potapov A.L., Khoteev A.Zh. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-2-132-142. https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/RUSSCO/2023/2023-44.pdf

The principles of prevention and treatment of nephrotoxicity in patients with Kaposi sarcoma correspond to the principles outlined in the clinical guidelines "Nephrotoxicity". Authors: Gromova E.G., Biryukova L.S., Dzhumabaeva B.T., Kurmukov I.A. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-2-153-166. https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/RUSSCO/2023/2023-47.pdf

The principles of prevention and treatment of thromboembolic complications in patients with Kaposi sarcoma correspond to the principles outlined in the clinical guidelines "Thromboembolic Complications". Authors: Somonova O.V., Antukh E.A., Vardanyan A.V., Gromova E.G., Dolgushin B.I., Elizarova A.L., Sakaeva D.D., Selchuk V.Yu., Tryakin A.A., Cherkasov V.A. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-2-167-178. https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/RUSSCO/2023/2023-48.pdf

The principles of prevention and treatment of the consequences of drug extravasation in patients with Kaposi sarcoma correspond to the principles outlined in the clinical guidelines "Extravasation of Antineoplastic Drugs". Authors: Buydenok Yu.V., Obukhova O.A. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-2-179-189. https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/RUSSCO/2023/2023-49.pdf

The principles of prevention and treatment of immune-mediated adverse events in patients with Kaposi sarcoma correspond to the principles outlined in the clinical guidelines "Immune-Mediated Adverse Events". Authors: Protsenko S.A., Ballyuzek M.F., Vasiliev D.A., Zhukova N.V., Novik A.V., Nosov D.A., Petenko N.N., Semenova A.I., Kharkevich G.Yu., Yudin D.I. DOI: 10.18027/2224-5057-2023-13-3s2-2-210-249. https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/RUSSCO/2023/2023-51.pdf

3.6 Nutritional Therapy

Diet therapy is not used for the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma.

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

These recommendations are based on numerous studies proving that various types of medical rehabilitation significantly accelerate functional recovery, reduce postoperative hospital stay, and decrease the incidence of complications and mortality in patients with other malignant neoplasms.

4.1 Pre-rehabilitation

It is recommended to perform prehabilitation in all patients with Kaposi sarcoma to accelerate functional recovery, shorten postoperative hospital stay, and reduce the incidence of complications and mortality during melanoma treatment. Prehabilitation includes physical training (exercise therapy), psychological and nutritional support, and patient education [63].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comment: It is advisable to advise the patient to increase physical activity 2 weeks prior to surgery to reduce the length of hospital stay and the risk of postoperative complications, as well as to improve postoperative quality of life [64].

4.2 First stage of rehabilitation

It is recommended to use a multidisciplinary approach in the rehabilitation of patients in oncodermatology, including motor rehabilitation, psychological support, and work with occupational therapists (occupational therapy instructors) [65].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended to initiate rehabilitation treatment early, as it improves functional outcomes after surgeries in oncodermatology [66].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended that an exercise therapy program be developed individually for each specific case, based on the characteristics and scope of the surgery [67].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

4.3 Second stage of rehabilitation

It is recommended to use techniques aimed at scar mobilization to prevent the formation of coarse scar changes, including in deep soft tissue layers: deep medical massage, stretching exercises, and ultrasound therapy to soften scar changes [68].

LoR CGoE 5Level of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

4.4 Third stage of rehabilitation

It is recommended to perform and gradually expand the exercise therapy program with the inclusion of aerobic exercise, which improves the outcomes of combined treatment for malignant neoplasms and quality of life [69].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5).

Medical massage is recommended to improve quality of life and reduce pain and fatigue [70].

GCP CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation – C (Level of Evidence – 5)

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

Adults with oncological diseases included in ICD-10 categories C00-D09 are subject to dispensary observation (follow-up).

Dispensary observation is organized at the outpatient oncological care center, or in the primary oncological office of a medical organization, oncological dispensary (oncological hospital), or other medical organizations providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases.

Comments:To date, there is no consensus regarding the frequency and intensity of monitoring for patients with Kaposi sarcoma. The goals of patient monitoring should be early detection of disease relapse, early detection of secondary tumors, and psychosocial support for patients.

The required scope of examination during the monitoring period for patients with Kaposi sarcoma depends on the KS subtype (Table 4).

Table 4. Scope of examination during the monitoring period for patients with KS after completion of therapy

Classic endemic KS

AIDS-related KS

Iatrogenic KS

Clinical examination

++

++

++

Determination of antibodies of classes M and G (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV 1) in blood, Determination of antibodies of classes M and G (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV 2) in blood

-

-

-

Standard blood tests

+

++

++

HHV-8 viremia

-

-

-

CD4 cells

-

++

+

Pathoanatomical examination

-

-

-

Whole-body CT

+-

+-

+-

Bronchoscopy

+-

+-

+-

Gastrointestinal endoscopy

+-

+-

+-

Necessity of performance:

+ used

- not used

++ mandatory

+ - depending on symptoms

It is recommended for disseminated forms, as well as life-threatening clinical situations (AIDS-related KS with extensive lesions, forms of KS after organ transplantation), to conduct clinical examination and monitoring at least once a month and whole-body CT once every 3 months until disease stabilization is achieved [1, 14]

GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

It is recommended for the classic form of KS with an indolent course to conduct a clinical examination every 6 to 12 months [1, 14]

GOR CLOE 5Grade of Recommendation — C (Level of Evidence — 5)

Comment: the goal of monitoring is the earliest possible detection of disease progression for the prompt initiation of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgical treatment, depending on the identified situation.

6. Organization of Medical Care

When Kaposi sarcoma is suspected, the dermatologist performs diagnostic tests (skin examination under magnification (dermatoscopy), and sampling of material for pathological anatomical examination of biopsy (surgical) skin material).

When Kaposi sarcoma is suspected or detected in a patient, dermatologists, as well as general practitioners, district general practitioners, general family physicians, medical specialists, and mid-level medical personnel shall, in the prescribed manner, refer the patient for a consultation to an outpatient oncological care center, or, in its absence, to a primary oncology office or the outpatient department of an oncological dispensary (oncology hospital) to receive primary specialized health care.

Consultation at an outpatient oncological care center, primary oncological office, or outpatient department of an oncological dispensary (oncological hospital) must be performed no later than 3 working days from the date of issuing the referral for consultation. The oncologist of the outpatient oncological care center (in the absence of such a center, the oncologist of the primary oncological office or outpatient department of the oncological dispensary/hospital) arranges for the acquisition of biopsy (surgical) material, as well as the performance of other diagnostic tests necessary to establish the diagnosis, including the extent of the oncological process and the stage of the disease.

If it is impossible to obtain biopsy (surgical) material or perform other diagnostic tests within the medical organization that includes the ambulatory cancer care center (primary oncology office), the patient is referred by the oncologist to an oncological dispensary (cancer hospital) or to a medical organization providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases.

The timeframe for performing pathological examinations necessary for the histological verification of malignant neoplasms shall not exceed 15 working days from the date of receipt of the biopsy (surgical) material by the pathoanatomical bureau (department).

The timeframe for diagnostic instrumental and laboratory examinations in case of suspected oncological disease shall not exceed the timeframes established in the state guarantee program for the free provision of medical care to citizens, approved by the Government of the Russian Federation, which is 7 working days from the date of prescribing the examinations.

The diagnosis of an oncological disease is established by a medical specialist based on the results of diagnostic examinations, including cytological and/or histological verification of the diagnosis, except for cases where obtaining biopsy and/or puncture material is not feasible.

An oncologist from an outpatient oncological care center (primary oncology office) refers the patient to an oncological dispensary (oncology hospital) or another medical organization providing medical care to cancer patients, including one subordinate to a federal executive body (hereinafter referred to as a federal medical organization), to clarify the diagnosis (if establishing the diagnosis is impossible, including the extent of the oncological process and disease stage), determine treatment tactics, and in the presence of medical indications for specialized, including high-tech, medical care.

For oncological diseases included in ICD-10 categories C37, C38, C40–C41, C45–C49, C58, D39, C62, C69–C70, C72, C74, as well as those corresponding to the codes of the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology (ICD-O), 3rd Edition 8936, 906-909, 8247/3, 8013/3, 8240/3, 8244/3, 8246/3, 8249/3, an oncologist at an oncological dispensary (oncological hospital) or other medical organization providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases shall organize a consultation or a medical board (consilium), including via telemedicine technologies, at federal state budgetary institutions subordinate to the Russian Ministry of Health that provide medical care (hereinafter referred to as national medical research centers for the purposes of this Procedure), in order to determine the treatment tactics.

In complex clinical cases, to clarify the diagnosis (in the event of the impossibility of establishing the diagnosis, including the extent of the oncological process and the stage of the disease) for the purpose of evaluation, interpretation, and description of the results, the oncologist shall arrange for the referral of:

digital images obtained from pathomorphological studies to the pathological anatomical bureau (department) of the fourth group (reference center)[1] via information interaction, including the use of telemedicine technologies for remote interaction between medical workers;

of digital images obtained from diagnostic imaging methods to the remote diagnostic imaging consultation center via information interaction, including the use of telemedicine technologies for remote interaction between medical workers;

biopsy (surgical) material for repeated pathomorphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic studies: to the pathoanatomical bureau (department) of the fourth group (reference center), as well as to molecular genetic laboratories for molecular genetic testing.

Treatment tactics are established by a medical board (consilium) comprising oncologists, a radiation therapist, and a neurosurgeon (in cases of nervous system tumors) of the medical organization that includes departments of surgical methods for treating malignant neoplasms, antineoplastic drug therapy, and radiotherapy (hereinafter referred to as the oncological consilium), including an oncological consilium conducted using telemedicine technologies, with the involvement of other specialist physicians when necessary.

Dispensary follow-up by an oncologist for a patient with a diagnosed oncological disease is established and carried out in accordance with the procedure for dispensary observation of adults with oncological diseases.

For accounting purposes, information about a newly diagnosed case of an oncological disease is sent within 3 working days by the oncologist of the medical organization where the corresponding diagnosis was established to the oncological dispensary or the organization of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation that performs the registration of patients with newly diagnosed malignant neoplasms, including through the use of the Unified State Health Information System. If the presence of an oncological disease is confirmed in a patient, information about the refined diagnosis is sent from the oncological dispensary or the organization of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation that performs the registration of patients with newly diagnosed malignant neoplasms to the medical organization providing clinical follow-up of the patient.

Specialized, including high-tech, medical care in medical organizations providing medical care to the adult population for oncological diseases is provided based on medical indications stipulated by the regulations on organizing the provision of specialized, including high-tech, medical care.

Specialized medical care, excluding high-tech medical care, in medical organizations subordinate to federal executive authorities is provided based on medical indications provided for in clause 5 of the procedure for referring patients to medical organizations and other organizations subordinate to federal executive authorities to provide specialized (excluding high-tech) medical care, stipulated in the appendix to the regulations on organizing the provision of specialized, including high-tech, medical care. (Clause 5: to receive specialized medical care on a planned basis, the federal medical organization is chosen upon the referral of the attending physician.) If several federal medical organizations participating in the implementation of the Program provide specialized medical care for diseases and conditions (group of diseases and conditions) corresponding to the patient's diseases and conditions (group of diseases and conditions), the attending physician is obliged to inform the patient (the patient's legal representative) about the possibility of choosing a federal medical organization, including the potential waiting times for specialized medical care, which may exceed the waiting times established by the program of state guarantees of free provision of medical care to citizens.

The waiting time for the provision of specialized (excluding high-tech) medical care must not exceed the timeframe established in the program of state guarantees of free medical care for citizens, approved by the Government of the Russian Federation, which is 7 working days.

If a patient with an oncological disease has medical indications for medical rehabilitation, the oncologist arranges for it to be provided in accordance with the procedure for organizing adult medical rehabilitation.

If a patient with an oncological disease has medical indications for sanatorium-resort treatment, the oncologist arranges for it in accordance with the procedure for organizing sanatorium-resort treatment.

Palliative medical care for a patient with oncological diseases is provided in accordance with the regulations on organizing the provision of palliative medical care, including the procedure for interaction between medical organizations, social service organizations, and public associations and other non-profit organizations operating in the field of health protection.

If an oncological disease is suspected and/or detected in a patient during the provision of emergency medical care, the patient is transferred or referred to medical organizations providing medical care to patients with oncological diseases to determine management tactics and the need for additional other methods of specialized antitumor treatment.

Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization in an emergency or urgent form are:

1) the presence of complications of the oncological disease requiring the provision of specialized medical care in an emergency and urgent form;

2) presence of complications of oncological disease treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, drug therapy, etc.) requiring the provision of specialized medical care in an emergency and urgent form

Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization in a planned form are:

1) the need to perform complex interventional diagnostic medical procedures, as well as endoscopic examinations when it is impossible to perform them on an outpatient basis, requiring subsequent monitoring in a round-the-clock or day hospital setting;

2) the presence of indications for specialized antitumor treatment (surgical intervention, RT, including contact, EBRD and other types of RT, drug therapy, etc.) requiring monitoring in an inpatient or day hospital setting.

Indications for discharging a patient from a medical organization are:

1) completion of a course of treatment or one of the stages of providing specialized, including high-tech, medical care in an inpatient or day hospital setting, provided there are no treatment complications requiring drug correction and/or medical interventions in an inpatient setting;

2) refusal of the patient or their legal representative from specialized, including high-tech, medical care in an inpatient or day-care setting determined by the concilium of the medical organization providing oncological care;

3) in cases of non-compliance by the patient with prescriptions or the internal regulations of the medical and prophylactic institution, provided this does not threaten the patient's life and the health of others;

4) the need to transfer the patient to another medical organization according to the relevant medical specialty profile.

The conclusion on the advisability of transferring a patient to a specialized medical organization is made after a preliminary consultation on the provided medical documents and/or a preliminary examination of the patient by specialist physicians of the medical organization to which the transfer is planned.

7. Additional Information

Currently known prognostic factors used for staging are presented in Table 5.

Table 5. Staging classification of AIDS-related KS [1, 2, 3]

Factor

Good prognosis

(all factors)

Poor prognosis

(one of the factors)

Tumor, T

T0: Confined to skin and/or lymph nodes and/or minimal oral cavity involvement (non-nodular KS)

T1: Tumor-associated edema or ulceration

Extensive oral cavity KS

Gastrointestinal KS

KS of other visceral organs excluding lymph nodes

Immune system, I1

I0: CD4+ cells > 150/mL

I1: CD4+ cells < 150/mL

Systemic states/diseases, S

S0: No history of opportunistic infections or aphthous stomatitis

No "B" symptoms2

Karnofsky performance status > 70

S1: History of opportunistic infections or aphthous stomatitis

Presence of "B" symptoms2

Karnofsky performance scale < 70

Other HIV-associated diseases (neurological diseases, lymphoma)

1 - currently this parameter has lesser clinical significance given the availability of antiretroviral therapy

2 - unexplained fever, night sweats, involuntary weight loss > 10%, or diarrhea lasting > 2 weeks.

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

Criteria for assessing the quality of medical care are given in Table 6.

Table 6. Criteria for assessing the quality of medical care

№

Quality criteria

Performance evaluation

1

Pathological anatomical examination of the skin biopsy (surgical) material was performed

Yes / No

2

Blood test for specific antibodies to HHV-8 was performed

Yes / No

3

Consultation with an oncological specialist was conducted upon detection of Kaposi sarcoma to determine treatment tactics

Yes / No

4

Determination of antibodies of classes M and G (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-1 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV 1) in blood and determination of antibodies of classes M and G (IgM, IgG) to human immunodeficiency virus HIV-2 (Human immunodeficiency virus HIV 2) in blood was performed to rule out association with HIV infection

Yes / No

References

Show references
  1. Friedman-Birnbaum R, Bergman R, Bitterman-Deutsch O, Weltfriend S, Lichtig C. Classic and iatrogenic Kaposi"s sarcoma. Histopathological patterns as related to clinical course. Am J Dermatopathol. 1993 Dec;15(6):523-7. PMID: 8311180.

  2. PDQ® Adult Treatment Editorial Board. PDQ Kaposi Sarcoma Treatment. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute.

  3. Mbulaiteye SM, Engels EA. Kaposi"s sarcoma risk among transplant recipients in the United States (1993-2003). Int J Cancer. 2006 Dec 1;119(11):2685-91.

  4. Stallone G., Schena A., Infante B. et al. Sirolimus for Kaposi"s sarcoma in renal-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2005; 352 (13): 1317–1323.

  5. Di Lorenzo G, Konstantinopoulos PA, Pantanowitz L, et al. Management of AIDS-related Kaposi"s sarcoma. Lancet Oncol. Feb 2008;8(2):167-76. 

  6. Kutlubay Z, Kucuktas M, Yardimci G, et al. Evaluation of effectiveness of cryotherapy on the treatment of cutaneous Kaposi"s sarcoma. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Oct;39(10):1502-6.

  7. Tsao MN, Sinclair E, Assaad D, et al.: Radiation therapy for the treatment of skin Kaposi sarcoma. Ann Palliat Med 5 (4): 298-302, 2016.

  8. Régnier-Rosencher E, Guillot B, Dupin N: Treatments for classic Kaposi sarcoma: a systematic review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol 68 (2): 313-31, 2013.

  9. E Odyakmaz Demirsoy, D Bayramgürler, Ç Çağlayan, N Bilen, A Şikar Aktürk, R Kıran  Imiquimod 5% Cream Versus Cryotherapy in Classic Kaposi Sarcoma/ Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery, 2019.

  10. Cianfrocca M, Lee S, Von Roenn J, Tulpule A, Dezube BJ, Aboulafia DM, et al. Randomized trial of paclitaxel versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for advanced human immunodeficiency virus-associated Kaposi sarcoma: evidence of symptom palliation from chemotherapy. Cancer. Aug 15 2010;116(16):3969-77. 

  11. Brinkhof MW, Pujades-Rodriguez M, Egger M. Mortality of patients lost to follow-up in antiretroviral treatment programmes in resource-limited settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2009 Jun 4;4(6):e5790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005790. PMID: 19495419; PMCID: PMC2686174.

  12. Hu S.C., Ke C.L., Lee C.H. et al. // J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venerol. – 2009. – Vol. 23, N 10. – P. 1128– 1132 Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition, Volume 3, WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board.

  13. Soft Tissue and Bone TumoursWHO Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition, Volume 3, WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board,ISBN - 978-92-832-4502-5, Cree, Ian A. (Editorial Board Chair).

  14. Lebbe C, Garbe C, Stratigos AJ, Harwood C, Peris K, Marmol VD, Malvehy J, Zalaudek I, Hoeller C, Dummer R, Forsea AM, Kandolf-Sekulovic L, Olah J, Arenberger P, Bylaite-Bucinskiene M, Vieira R, Middleton M, Levy A, Eggermont AM, Battistella M, Spano JP, Grob JJ, Pages C; European Dermatology Forum (EDF), the European Association of Dermato-Oncology (EADO) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Diagnosis and treatment of Kaposi"s sarcoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline (EDF/EADO/EORTC). Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jun;114:117-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 May 13. PMID: 31096150.

  15. Erin Reid, Gita Suneja et al, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Version 3.2020 AIDS-Related Kaposi Sarcoma.

  16. Krown SE, Testa MA, Huang J. AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma:  prospective validation of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group staging classification. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Oncology Committee. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:3085e92.

  17. Brenner B, Weissmann-Brenner A, Rakowsky E, Weltfriend S, Fenig E, Friedman-Birnbaum R, et al. Classical Kaposi sarcoma: prognostic factor analysis of 248 patients. Cancer 2002;95:1982e7.

  18. Zaraa I, Labbene I, El Guellali N, Ben Alaya N, Mokni M, Ben Osman A. [Kaposi’s sarcoma: epidemiological, clinical, anatomopathological and therapeutic features in 75 patients]. Tunis Med 2012;90:116e21.

  19. Bower M, Dalla Pria A, Coyle C, Andrews E, Tittle V, Dhoot S, et al. Prospective stage-stratified approach to AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:409e14.

  20. Nasti G, Martellotta F, Berretta M, Mena M, Fasan M, Di Perri G, et al. Impact of highly active antiretroviral therapy on the presenting features and outcome of patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related Kaposi sarcoma. Cancer 2003; 98:2440e6.

  21. Frances C. Kaposi’s sarcoma after renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:2768e73.

  22. Pellet C, Kerob D, Dupuy A, Carmagnat MV, Mourah S, Podgorniak MP, et al. Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus viremia is associated with the progression of classic and endemic Kaposi’s sarcoma. J Invest Dermatol 2006;126:621e7.

  23. Jakob L, Metzler G, Chen KM, Garbe C. Non-AIDS associated Kaposi’s sarcoma: clinical features and treatment outcome. PLoS One 2011;6:e18397

  24. Erin Reid, Gita Suneja et al, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology, Version 1.2021 AIDS-Related Kaposi Sarcoma.

  25. Koon HB, Krown SE, Lee JY, Honda K, Rapisuwon S, Wang Z, Aboulafia D, Reid EG, Rudek MA, Dezube BJ, Noy A. Phase II trial of imatinib in AIDS-associated Kaposi"s sarcoma: AIDS Malignancy Consortium Protocol 042. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 10;32(5):402-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.6365. Epub 2013 Dec 30. PMID: 24378417; PMCID: PMC3912327.

  26. Strother RM, Gregory KM, Pastakia SD, Were P, Tenge C, Busakhala N, Jakait B, Schellhase EM, Rosmarin AG, Loehrer PJ. Retrospective analysis of the efficacy of gemcitabine for previously treated AIDS-associated Kaposi"s sarcoma in western Kenya. Oncology. 2010;78(1):5-11. doi: 10.1159/000292356. Epub 2010 Mar 6. PMID: 20215784

  27. Reid E, Suneja G, Ambinder RF, Ard K, Baiocchi R, Barta SK, Carchman E, Cohen A, Crysler OV, Gupta N, Gustafson C, Hall A, Johung KL, Klopp A, LaCasce AS, Lin C, Mehta A, Menon MP, Morgan D, Nathwani N, Noy A, Ratner L, Rizza S, Rudek MA, Sanchez J, Taylor J, Tomlinson B, Wang CJ, Yendamuri S, Dwyer MA; CGC; Freedman-Cass DA. AIDS-Related Kaposi Sarcoma, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 Feb;17(2):171-189. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0008. PMID: 30787130.

  28. Hosseinipour MC, Kang M, Krown SE, Bukuru A, Umbleja T, Martin JN, Orem J, Godfrey C, Hoagland B, Mwelase N, Langat D, Nyirenda M, MacRae J, Borok M, Samaneka W, Moses A, Mngqbisa R, Busakhala N, Martínez-Maza O, Ambinder R, Dittmer DP, Nokta M, Campbell TB; A5264/AMC-067 REACT-KS Team. As-Needed Vs Immediate Etoposide Chemotherapy in Combination With Antiretroviral Therapy for Mild-to-Moderate AIDS-Associated Kaposi Sarcoma in Resource-Limited Settings: A5264/AMC-067 Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Jul 2;67(2):251-260. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy044. PMID: 29365083; PMCID: PMC6030807.

  29. Cao W, Vyboh K, Routy B, Chababi-Atallah M, Lemire B, Routy JP. Imatinib for highly chemoresistant Kaposi sarcoma in a patient with long-term HIV control: a case report and literature review. Curr Oncol. 2015 Oct;22(5):e395-9. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2635. PMID: 26628884; PMCID: PMC4608417.

  30. Koon HB, Krown SE, Lee JY, Honda K, Rapisuwon S, Wang Z, Aboulafia D, Reid EG, Rudek MA, Dezube BJ, Noy A. Phase II trial of imatinib in AIDS-associated Kaposi"s sarcoma: AIDS Malignancy Consortium Protocol 042. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb 10;32(5):402-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.6365. Epub 2013 Dec 30. PMID: 24378417; PMCID: PMC3912327.

  31. Stelzer KJ, Griffin TW. A randomized prospective trial of radiation therapy for AIDS-associated Kaposi’s sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993;27:1057e61.

  32. Singh NB, Lakier RH, Donde B. Hypofractionated radiation therapy in the treatment of epidemic Kaposi sarcoma–a prospective randomized trial. Radiother Oncol 2008;88:211e6.

  33. Harrison M, Harrington KJ, Tomlinson DR, Stewart JS. Response and cosmetic outcome of two fractionation regimens for AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma. Radiother Oncol 1998;46:23e8.

  34. Kigula-Mugambe JB, Kavuma A. Epidemic and endemic Kaposi’s sarcoma: a comparison of outcomes and survival after radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2005;76:59e62.

  35. Yildiz F, Genc M, Akyurek S, Cengiz M, Ozyar E, Selek U, et al. Radiotherapy in the management of Kaposi’s sarcoma: comparison of 8 Gy versus 6 Gy. J Natl Med Assoc 2006;98:1136e9.

  36. Caccialanza M, Marca S, Piccinno R, Eulisse G. Radiotherapy of classic and human immunodeficiency virus-related Kaposi’s sarcoma: results in 1482 lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008;22:297e302.Hamilton CR, Cummings BJ, Harwood AR. Radiotherapy of Kaposi’s sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1986;12:1931e5.

  37. Hamilton CR, Cummings BJ, Harwood AR. Radiotherapy of Kaposi’s sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1986;12:1931e5.

  38. Weshler Z, Loewinger E, Loewenthal E, Levinson R, Fuks Z. Megavoltage radiotherapy using water bolus in the treatment of Kaposi’s sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1986;12:2029e32.

  39. Ertürk Yılmaz T, Akay BN, Okçu Heper A. Dermoscopic findings of Kaposi sarcoma and dermatopathological correlations. Australas J Dermatol. 2020 Feb;61(1):e46-e53. doi: 10.1111/ajd.13150. Epub 2019 Sep 8. PMID: 31495914.

  40. T. Fitzpatrick, R. Johnson, K. Wolff. Dermatology in General Medicine (Atlas and Synopsis), 1999.

  41. A.A. Kubanova, V.I. Kisina. Rational Pharmacotherapy of Skin Diseases and Sexually Transmitted Infections, 2005

  42. Kazantseva K.V., Molochkov A.V., Molochkov V.A., Sukhova T.E., Prokofiev A.A., Kaprin A.D., Galkin V.N., Ivanov S.A., Kaplan M.A., Romanko Yu.S., Popuchiev V.V. Kaposi sarcoma: pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and modern treatment principles. // Russian Journal of Skin and Venereal Diseases. 2015. No. 1.

  43. Karass M, Grossniklaus E, Seoud T, Jain S, Goldstein DA. Kaposi Sarcoma Inflammatory Cytokine Syndrome (KICS): A Rare but Potentially Treatable Condition. Oncologist. 2017 May;22(5):623-625. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0237. Epub 2017 Apr 19. PMID: 28424322; PMCID: PMC5423516.

  44. Hoffmann C, Sabranski M, Esser S. HIV-Associated Kaposi"s Sarcoma. Oncol Res Treat. 2017;40(3):94-98. doi: 10.1159/000455971. Epub 2017 Feb 9. PMID: 28259888.

  45. Rassokhin V.V., Krestyaninov A.R. Kaposi sarcoma. Diagnosis and treatment. // Practical Oncology, Vol. 13, No. 2 – 2012

  46. Zidan J, Robenstein W, Abzah A, Taman S. Treatment of Kaposi"s sarcoma with vinblastine in patients with disseminated dermal disease. Isr Med Assoc J. 2001 Apr;3(4):251-3. PMID: 11344835.

  47. Goncalves PH, Ziegelbauer J, Uldrick TS, Yarchoan R. Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus-associated cancers and related diseases. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2017 Jan;12(1):47-56. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000330. PMID: 27662501; PMCID: PMC6311702.

  48. Polizzotto MN, Uldrick TS, Wyvill KM, Aleman K, Peer CJ, Bevans M, Sereti I, Maldarelli F, Whitby D, Marshall V, Goncalves PH, Khetani V, Figg WD, Steinberg SM, Zeldis JB, Yarchoan R. Pomalidomide for Symptomatic Kaposi"s Sarcoma in People With and Without HIV Infection: A Phase I/II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;34(34):4125-4131. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.3812. Epub 2016 Oct 31. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;36(19):2008. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.3158. PMID: 27863194; PMCID: PMC5477825.

  49. Kazantseva K.V., Molochkov A.V., Molochkov V.A., Sukhova T.E., Prokofiev A.A., Kaprin A.D., Galkin V.N., Ivanov S.A., Kaplan M.A., Romanko Yu.S., Popuchiev V.V. Kaposi sarcoma: pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and modern treatment principles // RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF SKIN AND VENEREAL DISEASES No. 1, 2015.

  50. Kartashova M.G. Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of idiopathic Kaposi sarcoma. // Dermatology No. 2, 2009.

  51. Kartashova M.G. Modern approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic Kaposi sarcoma. // Dermatology 2 — 2008.

  52. Moray G, Başaran O, Yağmurdur MC, Emiroğlu R, Bilgin N, Haberal M. Immunosuppressive therapy and Kaposi"s sarcoma after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2004 Jan-Feb;36(1):168-70. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2003.11.016. PMID: 15013336.

  53. Htet KZ, Waul MA, Leslie KS. Topical treatments for Kaposi sarcoma: A systematic review. Skin Health Dis. 2022 Apr 8;2(2):e107. doi: 10.1002/ski2.107. PMID: 35677916; PMCID: PMC9168015.

  54. Erin Reid et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2021, Kaposi Sarcoma, 2/12/21

  55. Brambilla L, Labianca R, Boneschi V, Fossati S, Dallavalle G, Finzi AF, Luporini G. Mediterranean Kaposi"s sarcoma in the elderly. A randomized study of oral etoposide versus vinblastine. Cancer. 1994 Nov 15;74(10):2873-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941115)74:10<2873::aid-cncr2820741021>3.0.co;2-1. PMID: 7954250.

  56. Brambilla L, Boneschi V, Fossati S, Melotti E, Clerici M. Oral etoposide for Kaposi"s Mediterranean sarcoma. Dermatologica. 1988;177(6):365-9. doi: 10.1159/000248608. PMID: 2466707.

  57. Tas F, Sen F, Keskin S, Kilic L. Oral etoposide as first-line therapy in the treatment of patients with advanced classic Kaposi"s sarcoma (CKS): a single-arm trial (oral etoposide in CKS). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2013 Jun;27(6):789-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04404.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20. PMID: 22188463.

  58. Oken M. M., Creech R. H., Tormey D. C., Horton J., Davis T. E., McFadden E. T., Carbone P. P. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group // Am J Clin Oncol. ‒ 1982. ‒ T. 5, № 6. ‒ C. 649-55.

  59. Karnofsky D. A., Burchenal J. H. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer // Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents / MacLeod C. ‒ New York: Columbia University Press, 1949. ‒ C. 191-205

  60. M. Silveira Vilbert, I. Hirsch, E.C. Koch, T. Pimentel Muniz, D. Pinheiro Xavier et al. Treatment of Kaposi sarcoma with immune-checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis. 775P, Vol.33, Suppl. 7, S895,  Sep 2022.I:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2022.07.901

  61. Delyon J, Biard L, Renaud M, Resche-Rigon M, et al. PD-1 blockade with pembrolizumab in classic or endemic Kaposi"s sarcoma: a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Apr;23(4):491-500. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00097-3. Epub 2022 Mar 10. PMID: 35279271.

  62. Lolli I, Valentini AM, Ricci AD, Armentano R. Anaplastic Classic Kaposi Sarcoma: PD-L1 Expression and Response to Immunotherapy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Apr 7;21(5):442-448.e2. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7091. PMID: 37028800.

  63. Silver JK, Baima J: Cancer prehabilitation: an opportunity to decrease treatment-related morbidity, increase cancer treatment options, and improve physical and psychological health outcomes. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013, 92(8):715-727.

  64. Nilsson H, Angeras U, Bock D, Borjesson M, Onerup A, Fagevik Olsen M, Gellerstedt M, Haglind E, Angenete E: Is preoperative physical activity related to post-surgery recovery? A cohort study of patients with breast cancer. BMJ open 2016, 6(1):e007997.

  65. Siegel GW, Biermann JS, Chugh R, Jacobson JA, Lucas D, Feng M, Chang AC, Smith SR, Wong SL, Hasen J: The multidisciplinary management of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: an essential organizational framework. J Multidiscip Healthc 2015, 8:109-115.

  66. Shehadeh A, El Dahleh M, Salem A, Sarhan Y, Sultan I, Henshaw RM, Aboulafia AJ: Standardization of rehabilitation after limb salvage surgery for sarcomas improves patients" outcome. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther 2013, 6(3-4):105-111.

  67. Cox CL, Montgomery M, Oeffinger KC, Leisenring W, Zeltzer L, Whitton JA, Mertens AC, Hudson MM, Robison LL: Promoting physical activity in childhood cancer survivors: results from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer 2009, 115(3):642-654.

  68. Oren R, Zagury Al, Katzir O, Kollender Y, Meller I: Musculoskeletal Cancer Surgery. In., edn. Edited by Malawer. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013: 583-593.

  69. Segal R, Zwaal C, Green E, Tomasone JR, Loblaw A, Petrella T, Exercise for People with Cancer Guideline Development G: Exercise for people with cancer: a systematic review. Curr Oncol 2017, 24(4):e290-e315.

  70. Boyd C, Crawford C, Paat CF, Price A, Xenakis L, Zhang W, Evidence for Massage Therapy Working G: The Impact of Massage Therapy on Function in Pain Populations-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials: Part II, Cancer Pain Populations. Pain Med 2016, 17(8):1553-1568.

  71. O"Mahony D, Gandjbakche A, Hassan M, Vogel A, Yarchoan R. Imaging techniques for Kaposi"s sarcoma. J HIV Ther. 2008 Sep;13(3):65-71. PMID: 19039297; PMCID: PMC2600536.

  72. Restrepo CS, Ocazionez D. Kaposi"s sarcoma: imaging overview. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2011 Oct;32(5):456-69. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2011.03.007. PMID: 21963166.

  73. Addula D, Das CJ, Kundra V. Imaging of Kaposi sarcoma. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Nov;46(11):5297-5306. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03205-6. Epub 2021 Jul 13. PMID: 34255129; PMCID: PMC8502139.

  74. Weprin L, Zollinger R, Clausen K, Thomas FB. Kaposi"s sarcoma: endoscopic observations of gastric and colon involvement. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1982 Aug;4(4):357-60. PMID: 7119413.

  75. Aliaga Ramos J, Cedrón Cheng H, Pinto Valdivia J. Clinical and endoscopic findings of patients with cutaneous Kaposi sarcomaand gastrointestinal involvement. Experience in a single center of Lima-Peruin the last 3 years. Rev Gastroenterol Peru. 2019 Apr-Jun;39(2):123-126. English. PMID: 31333227.

  76. Carmo J, Marques SC, Bispo M, Pinto D, Chagas C. Clinical and Endoscopic Features of Gastrointestinal Kaposi Sarcoma: A Single-Center Portuguese Experience over the Last Decade. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;24(5):219-226. doi: 10.1159/000461592. Epub 2017 Apr 11. PMID: 29255756; PMCID: PMC5729958.

  77. Erin Reid, Gita Suneja et al. NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2024 Kaposi Sarcoma. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/kaposi.pdf

  78. Célestin Schartz NE, Chevret S, Paz C, Kerob D, Verola O, Morel P, Lebbé C. Imiquimod 5% cream for treatment of HIV-negative Kaposi"s sarcoma skin lesions: A phase I to II, open-label trial in 17 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Apr;58(4):585-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.11.005. Epub 2008 Feb 20. PMID: 18068265.

  79. Benomar S, Boutayeb S, Benzekri L, Errihani H, Hassam B. Kaposi"s sarcoma responding to topical imiquimod 5% cream: a case report. Cases J. 2009 Sep 17;2:7092. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-0002-0000007092. PMID: 20181188; PMCID: PMC2827081.

  80. Brambilla L, Labianca R, Ferrucci SM, Taglioni M, Boneschi V. Treatment of classical Kaposi"s sarcoma with gemcitabine. Dermatology. 2001;202(2):119-22. doi: 10.1159/000051610. PMID: 11306832.

  81. Badalamenti G, Incorvaia L, Algeri L, Bonasera A, Dimino A, Scalia R, Cucinella A, Madonia G, Pomi FL, Galvano A, Gristina V, Toia F, Cordova A, Bazan V, Russo A. Safety and effectiveness of gemcitabine for the treatment of classic Kaposi"s sarcoma without visceral involvement. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Mar 26;14:17588359221086829. doi: 10.1177/17588359221086829. PMID: 35356263; PMCID: PMC8958699.

  82. Costa da Cunha CS, Lebbe C, Rybojad M, Agbalika F, Ferchal F, Rabian C, Vignon-Pennamen MD, Calvo F, Morel P. Long-term follow-up of non-HIV Kaposi"s sarcoma treated with low-dose recombinant interferon alfa-2b. Arch Dermatol. 1996 Mar;132(3):285-90. doi: 10.1001/archderm.132.3.285. PMID: 8607632.

  83. Curatolo P, Careri R, Simioni A, Campana LG. Cryotherapy, Imiquimod, and Electrochemotherapy Are Effective Options for Kaposi Sarcoma: A Call for Standardization to Allow for Comparisons and Informed Decisions. J Cutan Med Surg. 2020 Mar/Apr;24(2):218-219. doi: 10.1177/1203475419893302. PMID: 32208013.

  84. Chao  S,  Lee  Y,  Tsao  C.  Treatment of classical type Kaposi"s sarcoma with paclitaxel. Anticancer Res 21: 571-574, 200.

  85. Engin H, Celik I. Treatment of classical Kaposi"s sarcoma with visceral involvement by weekly paclitaxel. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2002 Apr;14(2):178. doi: 10.1053/clon.2002.0058. PMID: 12069127.

  86. Paksoy N, Khanmammadov N, Doğan İ, Ferhatoğlu F, Ahmed MA, Karaman S, Aydiner A. Weekly paclitaxel treatment in the first-line therapy of classic Kaposi sarcoma: A real-life study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Feb 3;102(5):e32866. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032866. PMID: 36749246; PMCID: PMC9901949.

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

  1. Kubanov A.A., Corresponding Member of the RAS, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Director of the State Research Center of Dermatovenereology and Cosmetology of the Russian Ministry of Health, President of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists.

  2. Snarskaya E.S., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Skin and Venereal Diseases, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University.

  3. Dubensky V.V., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Dermatovenereology with a Course in Cosmetology, Tver State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Tver, member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists.

  4. Dubensky V.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Deputy Chief Physician for Medical Affairs, V.P. Avaev Center for Specialized Medical Care, Professor at the Department of Dermatovenereology with a Course in Cosmetology, Tver State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the Russian Society of Dermatovenereologists and Cosmetologists.

  5. Zhuchkov M.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Deputy Chief Physician for Organizational and Methodological Work, Ryazan Regional Clinical Dermatovenereological Dispensary.

  6. Fedenko A.A., Head of the Department of Drug Treatment of Tumors, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  7. Demidov L.V., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Skin Tumors at the Department of Drug Treatment, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chairman of the Board of the Association of Melanoma Specialists.

  8. Orlova K.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Department of Skin Tumors, Department of Drug Treatment, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health; member of the Board of the Association of Melanoma Specialists

  9. Bokhyan B.Yu., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the Department of General Oncology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the Eastern European Sarcoma Group

  10. Bukharov A.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher, National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  11. Kurilchik A.A., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health, expert of the Eastern European Sarcoma Group.

Medical Rehabilitation Section:

  1. Butenko A.V., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Chairman of the Scientific Board of the Association of Specialists in Oncological Rehabilitation

  2. Obukhova O.A., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Physiotherapist, Head of the Rehabilitation Department, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN), Russian Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (RESPEN);

  3. Semiglazova T.Yu., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Leading Researcher at the Research Department of Innovative Methods of Therapeutic Oncology and Rehabilitation, N.N. Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology of the Russian Ministry of Health, Associate Professor at the Department of Oncology, North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov of the Russian Ministry of Health;

  4. Filonenko E.V., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Center for Laser and Photodynamic Diagnostics and Therapy of Tumors, P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health, oncologist;

Healthcare Organization Section:

  1. Ivanov Sergey Anatolyevich, Professor of the RAS, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Director of the A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow Oblast, Obninsk.

  2. Nevolskikh A.A., Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor, Deputy Director for Clinical Work, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health;

  3. Khaylova Zh.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Chief Physician of the Clinic, A.F. Tsyb Medical Radiological Research Center, branch of the National Medical Research Radiological Center of the Russian Ministry of Health.

  4. Gevorkyan Tigran Gagikovich, Deputy Director of the Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Radiology, N.N. Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Moscow.

No conflicts of interest.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience for these clinical guidelines:

  • oncologists;

  • surgeons;

  • radiologists;

  • medical geneticists;

  • dermatovenerologists;

  • pathologists;

  • general practitioners (internal medicine);

  • district general practitioners;

  • general practitioners (family doctors);

  • medical students, residents, and graduate students.

Table 1. Level of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

There is only a rationale for the mechanism of action or expert opinion

Table 2. Level of evidence (LoE) grading scale for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

LoE

Definitions

1

Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis

2

Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

There is only a rationale for the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion

Table 3. Grade of Recommendation (GoR) scale for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)

GoR

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

B

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of evidence of proper quality; all considered efficacy criteria [outcomes] are unimportant, all studies have low methodological quality, and their conclusions regarding outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.

The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

These clinical guidelines were developed taking into account the following regulatory legal documents:

  1. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 116n dated February 19, 2021, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to Adult Patients with Oncological Diseases".

  2. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 548n dated June 4, 2020, "On Approval of the Procedure for Dispensary Observation of Adults with Oncological Diseases".

  3. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 404n dated April 27, 2021, "On Approval of the Procedure for Conducting Preventive Medical Examinations and Clinical Examinations (Dispanserization) of Certain Groups of the Adult Population".

  4. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 203n dated May 10, 2017, "On Approval of Criteria for Assessing the Quality of Medical Care".

  5. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2406-r dated October 12, 2019 (as amended on December 24, 2022) "On Approval of the List of Vital and Essential Drugs, as well as Lists of Drugs for Medical Use and the Minimum Assortment of Drugs Necessary for the Provision of Medical Care".

  6. Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 103n dated February 28, 2019, "On Approval of the Procedure and Deadlines for the Development of Clinical Guidelines, Their Revision, the Standard Form of Clinical Guidelines and Requirements for Their Structure, Composition, and Scientific Validity of Information Included in Clinical Guidelines" (registered with the Russian Ministry of Justice on May 8, 2019, No. 54588).

  7. Methodological recommendations for assessing the scientific validity of information included in clinical guidelines, Center for Expertise and Quality Control of Medical Care of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 2019.

  8. Current instructions for medicinal products mentioned in these clinical guidelines can be found on the website http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru.

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Flowchart 1. Patient Management Algorithm

Appendix B. Algorithms of physician actions — Kaposi's Sarcoma

Appendix B. Algorithms of physician actions — Kaposi's Sarcoma

Appendix C. Patient Information

Recommendations for chemotherapy complications

In case of chemotherapy complications, it is necessary to contact an oncologist (chemotherapist).

1. If body temperature rises to +38 °C or higher, start taking antibiotics as prescribed by the oncologist.

2. In case of stomatitis:

  • diet with mechanical and thermal sparing of the mucosa;

  • frequently (every hour) rinse the oral cavity with decoctions of chamomile, oak bark, sage, and lubricate the gums with sea buckthorn (peach) oil;

  • treat the oral cavity as recommended by the oncologist.

3. In case of diarrhea:

  • diet – exclude fatty, spicy, smoked, sweet, dairy products, and fiber. Lean meat, flour products, fermented milk products, and rice water are allowed. Drink plenty of fluids;

  • take medications as prescribed by the oncologist.

4. In case of nausea, take medications as prescribed by your oncologist.

Information for patients receiving therapy with PD-1 blocking monoclonal antibodies (ATC L01FF02, # pembrolizumab** (ATC – L01XC18))

Timely communication with your attending physician and nurse regarding your health status is an important part of helping the medical team protect you throughout your treatment as safely as possible.

It is very important that any symptoms (adverse events) associated with PD-1 blocker treatment (ATC L01FF02, # pembrolizumab** (ATC – L01XC18)) are identified and treated at the very beginning of their manifestation, which will help prevent them from progressing to more severe grades.

PD-1 blocking mAbs (ATC L01FF02, # pembrolizumab** (ATC – L01XC18)) are designed to help your body's immune system fight the tumor process. The most common side effects you may encounter during treatment are the result of high immune system activity. Such side effects are called immune-mediated and differ from the side effects you may observe with other types of malignant tumor treatments.

Adverse events that you may experience usually occur in the first 12 weeks of treatment, but can also appear later.

It is very important that you inform your attending physician about any symptoms that appear during treatment with PD-1 blockers. Early recognition of side effects enables your attending physician to immediately initiate appropriate therapy and prevent adverse events from progressing to more severe grades.

If after treatment with PD-1 blocking mAbs (ATC L01FF02, # pembrolizumab** (ATC – L01XC18)) you experience any of the symptoms listed below, please inform your attending physician immediately.

Possible adverse events following PD-1 blocker therapy:

  • an increase in the frequency of bowel movements to 2 or more times a day or any nighttime diarrhea, any stool containing mucus and blood;

  • abdominal pain or chills, as well as pain requiring medical intervention;

  • red, painful eyes or yellowish coloration of the whites of the eyes, blurred vision, inflammation or swelling of the eyes;

  • yellow coloration or redness of the skin, itchy rash, skin sensitivity to sunlight;

  • newly onset cough or shortness of breath;

  • fatigue or drowsiness;

  • difficulty concentrating or confusion;

  • headache, body aches, or pain at the tumor site;

  • fever (body temperature rise up to +38 °C);

  • sudden decrease or increase in body weight;

  • newly onset erectile dysfunction or loss of interest in intimate life.

Please pay special attention to any changes in bowel habits. Keep a daily log of the number of bowel movements. Diarrhea may not always present as watery stools. An increase in the number of bowel movements per day, even with formed stools, potentially indicates a problem.

Important: side effects may occur from 1 week to several months after starting treatment with PD-1 blockers. If you experience any of the above symptoms, immediately inform your attending physician or nurse.

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Appendix G1. WHO/ECOG patient performance status scale [58]

Russian title: WHO Performance Status Scale / ECOG

Original title: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization Performance Status (ECOG/WHO PS)

Source (official developer website, validated publication): https://ecog-acrin.org/resources/ecog-performance-status

Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC, Horton J, Davis TE, McFadden ET, Carbone PP: Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 1982, 5(6):649-655

Type: rating scale

Purpose: to describe the patient's level of functioning in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activities, and physical abilities (walking, work, etc.).

Contents:

Score

Description

0

Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction (90–100% on the Karnofsky scale)

1

Restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature (e.g., light housework, office work, 70–80% on the Karnofsky scale)

2

Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities; up and about more than 50% of waking hours (50–60% on the Karnofsky scale)

3

The patient is capable of only limited self-care, confined to a chair or bed for more than 50% of waking hours (30–40% on the Karnofsky scale)

4

Disabled, completely incapable of self-care, confined to a wheelchair or bed (10–20% on the Karnofsky scale)

5

Dead

Key (interpretation): provided within the scale itself

Appendix G2. Karnofsky scale [59]

Russian title: Karnofsky Performance Scale

Original title (if applicable): KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE STATUS

Source (official developer website, validated publication): Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH: The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents. edn. Edited by MacLeod C. New York: Columbia University Press; 1949: 191-205

Type: rating scale

Purpose: to assess the patient's level of functioning in terms of their ability to care for themselves, daily activity, and physical capability (walking, working, etc.).

Content (template):

Karnofsky Performance Scale

100— Normal condition, no complaints

90— Able to carry on normal activity; minor symptoms or signs of disease

80— Normal activity with effort; some symptoms or signs of disease

75— Cares for self; unable to carry on normal activity or to do active work

60— Requires occasional assistance, but is able to care for most of his personal needs

50— Requires considerable assistance and frequent medical care

40— Disabled; requires special care and assistance, including medical care

30 — Severely disabled, hospitalization indicated, although death not imminent

20— Very sick; hospitalization and active supportive treatment necessary

10— Moribund

0— Death

Key (interpretation): provided within the scale itself

Scales and calculators from this guideline

Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS)Percentage scale for self-care and work capacityECOG / WHO (Performance Status)Scale for assessing the general condition of cancer patients
ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer using the «Kaposi's Sarcoma» guideline and other current Russian Ministry of Health clinical guidelines with section references, rather than retelling foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines