Age-related macular degeneration: clinical guidelines

Applies toadults2024 editionH35.3

Clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health, adults. 2024 edition, ICD-10 codes: H35.3.

Receive research articles on "Age-related macular degeneration"Every morning — fresh PubMed studies on this topic and specialty: in English, with figures, sample sizes, and conclusions. Plus updates on changes in Russian clinical guidelines.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Brief for Practice

WhiteCoat Pro editorial summary based on the 2024 guideline text. Each item links to the original section — verify against it before prescribing.

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a chronic progressive disease of the central fundus, predominantly affecting older adults, which can lead to central vision loss. The guideline describes staging, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of dry and wet AMD, including intravitreal therapy for choroidal neovascularization.

Key points

Diagnostics

  1. Clarify complaints: in the intermediate stage, mild visual reduction, metamorphopsia, and missing letters during reading are possible; in the wet form — marked visual reduction, metamorphopsia, and reading difficulties; in the atrophic form — significant visual reduction and inability to read. Take a history of smoking, family cases of AMD, and concomitant ocular and systemic diseases. → in text
  2. Determine best-corrected visual acuity: perform visometry and refractometry or determine refraction with trial lenses. Concurrently, perform tonometry and biomicroscopy of the eye. → in text
  3. Examine the fundus under drug-induced mydriasis using biomicroscopy or ophthalmoscopy to detect fundus changes, assess their severity, monitor, and select management tactics. → in text
  4. Perform OCT to detect fundus changes and signs of CNV activity, determine management tactics, and evaluate treatment outcomes. → in text
  5. In diagnostically complex cases, use FA to clarify the wet form, differential diagnosis, and additional signs of CNV activity; in wet AMD and complex cases — OCT-A for morphometric assessment of CNV and vascular malformations. → in text
  6. Stage the disease according to AREDS: the intermediate stage is determined, in particular, by the presence of at least one large drusen with a diameter ≥125 µm or geographic atrophy without foveal involvement; the late atrophic form — by geographic atrophy involving the central zone, and the wet form — by CNV with fluid, retinal pigment epithelial detachment, hemorrhages, or hard exudates. → in text
  7. Laboratory tests do not have independent diagnostic criteria for AMD. Before intravitreal administration or hospitalization, a general status assessment and identification of potential contraindications are performed in the scope determined by regulatory documents and concomitant diseases; general and biochemical blood tests, urinalysis, and other laboratory tests listed in the guideline are provided. → in text

Treatment

When to refer and how to monitor

Frequently asked questions

What signs indicate active wet AMD?

These include decreased vision, macular hemorrhages, the appearance or increase of intraretinal, subretinal fluid, or fluid under the retinal pigment epithelium, as well as dye leakage beyond the vessels on FA. OCT is the most informative method for detecting pathological fluid. → in text

Which method is primary for monitoring CNV activity?

OCT is performed to detect fundus changes and signs of CNV activity, select management tactics, and evaluate treatment outcomes. In complex cases, FA and OCT-A are additionally used. → in text

What is prescribed for intermediate dry AMD?

Multivitamins and other products optimized for retinal diseases, including those containing lutein and zeaxanthin, are prescribed in periodic courses according to the instructions. The recommendation aims to reduce the risk of progression to the late stage; LoR A, LoE 2. → in text

Which drugs are first-line therapy in wet AMD?

These are intravitreal ranibizumab, aflibercept, brolucizumab, or faricimab. The specific drug and injection interval are selected according to the instructions, disease activity, visual acuity, and anatomical retinal changes. → in text

How often should a patient without AMD or with an early stage be monitored?

An ophthalmological examination is performed once a year. In intermediate or late stages, as well as in the presence of progression risk factors, the frequency of visits is established individually. → in text

Status
Applied · approved by the Scientific and Practical Council of the Russian Ministry of Health
Database ID
114, edition 3 (ID 114_3)
Publication date
August 15, 2024
Age category
adults
ICD-10 codes
H35.3
Specialties
Ophthalmology
Developers
All-Russian Public Organization "Association of Ophthalmologists"
Official text
Russian Ministry of Health Rubricator — 114_3

List of Abbreviations

AMD ― age-related macular degeneration

HIV ― human immunodeficiency virus

GA ― geographic atrophy

ELISA — enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

ICD-10 — International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision

NE — neuroepithelium

OCT ― optical coherence tomography

OCT-A ― optical coherence tomography angiography

PCV ― polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy

PCR — polymerase chain reaction

RPE ― retinal pigment epithelium

RAP ― retinal angiomatous proliferation

RNA — ribonucleic acid

FA ― fluorescein angiography

CNV ― choroidal neovascularization

AREDS ― Age-Related Eye Disease Study

VEGF — vascular endothelial growth factor

** – vital and essential drugs

Terms and Definitions

Ocular biomicroscopy is an in vivo visual examination method of the optical media and ocular tissues based on creating contrast between illuminated and non-illuminated areas, performed using a slit lamp and additional diagnostic lenses (specifically, for fundus biomicroscopy).

Hemorrhagic pigment epithelium (RPE) or neuroepithelium (NE) detachment is a clinical manifestation of the wet form of AMD that develops due to a breach in the vessel integrity of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) and presents as an accumulation of blood beneath the RPE or NE.

Geographic atrophy (GA) is an area of RPE absence and choriocapillaris regression, with secondary photoreceptor atrophy, developing as a result of dry AMD progression.

Drusen are accumulations of impaired metabolism products located extracellularly between the inner layer of Bruch's membrane and the RPE basement membrane.

Intraretinal fluid (neuroepithelium (NE) edema) is an intercellular accumulation of fluid in the NE layers, manifesting as retinal thickening.

Fundus autofluorescence imaging is a diagnostic method based on the ability of fluorophores (specifically lipofuscin and its compounds) to autofluoresce upon excitation without the administration of dyes.

Lipid (hard) exudates are accumulations of lipoproteins in the NE layers resulting from increased vascular permeability.

Neovascular RPE detachment is a separation between the RPE and Bruch's membrane due to the presence of CNV fibrovascular tissue (fibrovascular RPE detachment) or fluid accumulation resulting from the transudative activity of CNV (serous neovascular RPE detachment).

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a diagnostic non-invasive, non-contact in vivo visualization method for qualitative and quantitative analysis of the morphological features of fundus structures, based on the principle of optical interferometry.

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) is a diagnostic non-invasive, non-contact in vivo visualization method for qualitative and quantitative analysis of microcirculation in fundus structures, taking into account fundus layer segmentation.

Subretinal fluid (serous NE detachment) is an accumulation of fluid beneath the NE.

Fluorescein angiography (FA, sodium fluorescein angiography) is a diagnostic method that allows the detection of vascular bed abnormalities in the fundus and the evaluation of the state of the outer and inner blood-retinal barriers by recording the passage of a dye (intravenously administered sodium fluorescein) through the ocular vessels using photo- and video-monitoring.

Photodynamic therapy is a method of treating certain eye diseases based on the use of photosensitive substances (photosensitizers) and light of a specific wavelength for the purpose of occluding pathological vessels.

Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) are newly formed vessels growing as a result of pathological neoangiogenesis from the choriocapillary network through defects in Bruch's membrane beneath the RPE and/or NE.

1. Brief information on the disease or condition

1.1 Definition of the disease or condition

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a chronic, progressive, multifactorial disease characterized by a degenerative process in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), Bruch's membrane, and choriocapillaris of the central fundus zone with secondary damage to the neuroepithelium (NE) and is the main cause of central vision loss among the elderly population.

Typical signs of AMD include:

  • drusen;

  • changes in the retinal RPE;

  • geographic atrophy (GA);

  • choroidal neovascularization (CNV).

Special forms of wet AMD are considered to be:

  • retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP);

  • polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

RAP is a special form of wet AMD characterized by the onset of a proliferative process in the retinal vascular network followed by the formation of CNV and a retino-choroidal anastomosis.

PCV is a special form of wet AMD characterized by the development of aneurysmal dilations at the terminals of an abnormally branching choroidal vascular network.

1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)

The etiology is undetermined. As a rule, the disease occurs at the age of 50 years and older [1]. The role of genetic predisposition, the influence of smoking, and other risk factors are discussed [2].

AMD represents a chronic degenerative process in the RPE, Bruch's membrane, and choriocapillaris. Lipid peroxidation reactions, inflammation, complement system impairment, deficiency of defense mechanisms, and other factors play a role in pathogenesis [3].

The retina is characterized by a high oxygen demand, making it very sensitive to oxidative damage during which free radicals are produced in excess. A protective role is played by the "yellow" macular pigment (oxycarotenoids lutein and zeaxanthin), which absorbs the short-wave portion of blue light and participates in antioxidant defense. The amount of oxycarotenoids decreases with age. Activation of lipid peroxidation leads to the formation of large molecular chains that are not recognized by RPE cell enzymes, do not break down, and accumulate, forming drusen [4].

In addition, with age, the thickness of Bruch's membrane increases, its permeability decreases, and the density of the choriocapillary network diminishes. As a result, the oxygen supply to RPE cells worsens. When defense mechanisms are insufficient, such changes lead to an increased production of growth factors and matrix metalloproteinases. Growth factors promote the growth of newly formed vessels, while metalloproteinases cause the appearance of defects in Bruch's membrane [5].

Clinically, AMD typically begins with changes in the RPE and the appearance of hard drusen, followed by the formation of soft drusen. Progressive RPE loss combined with degenerative changes in the choriocapillaris lead to degenerative changes in the NE and the development of GA. The growth of newly formed vessels in the choriocapillary layer is associated with the development of the wet form of AMD, also called exudative or neovascular. Upon the appearance of defects in Bruch's membrane, CNV spreads beneath the RPE and NE. The activity of newly formed vessels may manifest as hemorrhages, intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid, or fluid beneath the RPE. The final stage of the process development—the formation of a subretinal fibrous scar in the central region of the fundus—is associated with significant central vision loss [6].

1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition

In economically developed countries, AMD is the leading cause of visual disability among the elderly population. According to a meta-analysis of 39 population-based studies covering 129,664 people from five ethnic groups, the estimated number of AMD patients worldwide in 2020 was 196 million, with a projected growth to 288 million patients by 2040 [7].

It has been proven that the development of AMD is associated with age. According to the Beaver Dam Eye Study, the detection rate of AMD increased from 4.2% for people aged 43–54 years to 46.2% among people older than 75 years [8]. In the near future, the growth of the population aged over 60 will inevitably cause an increase in the prevalence of AMD in developed countries. All this makes it necessary to consider AMD as a significant medical and social problem [8, 9].

In the Russian Federation, large-scale epidemiological studies of AMD have not been conducted. According to federal statistical observation data (form No. 12) "Information on the number of diseases registered in patients living in the service area of a medical organization", in 2018, a total of 319,340 patients with macular and posterior pole degeneration (H35.3) were registered in the Russian Federation.

Risk factors:

  1. The main risk factor for developing AMD is age [10];

  2. Smoking doubles the risk of developing AMD. Quitting smoking leads to a reduced risk of AMD (the risk of developing AMD in those who have not smoked for more than 20 years is comparable to that of non-smokers) [11];

  3. Ethnic factor. AMD affects Europeans more frequently than representatives of other ethnic groups [12];

  4. Family history. Genetic factors [13, 14];

  5. Arterial hypertension and lipid metabolism disorders [15];

  6. Low blood serum antioxidant concentration [16].

1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition

H35.3 — Degeneration of macula and posterior pole

1.5 Classification of the disease or condition

The classification adopted in routine clinical practice [17] distinguishes:

  • dry (non-exudative; in late stage - atrophic) form of AMD,

  • wet (neovascular or exudative) form of AMD.

The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) classification [18], adopted in clinical trials and widely used in clinical practice, distinguishes the following stages:

  1. No AMD (AREDS Category 1): no changes or a few small drusen (diameter <63 microns);

  2. Early AMD (AREDS Category 2, early dry AMD): multiple small drusen, a few intermediate drusen (diameter 63 to 124 microns), or mild retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) abnormalities;

  3. Intermediate AMD (AREDS Category 3, intermediate dry AMD): extensive intermediate drusen, at least one large drusen (diameter ≥125 microns), or geographic atrophy (GA) not involving the foveal center;

  4. Late (advanced) AMD (AREDS Category 4): characterized by one or more of the following features (in the absence of other causes):

  • Geographic atrophy (GA) involving the foveal center – atrophic (dry) form;

  • Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) with various manifestations (neurosensory retinal and/or RPE detachment, neurosensory retinal edema, hemorrhages, hard (lipid) exudates, etc.) – wet (neovascular, exudative) AMD;

  • Fibrovascular disciform scar formation (end-stage wet AMD).

1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition

Drusen are the hallmark fundus manifestation of AMD. Drusen are classified into hard, soft, and reticular pseudodrusen.

Hard cuticular drusen are a manifestation of early-stage AMD and are associated with the deposition of drusenoid material beneath the RPE. On fundus biomicroscopy, they appear as small, well-demarcated yellowish foci in the macula. On OCT scans, they present as localized elevations of the RPE band with medium reflectivity; the base diameter of the elevation typically does not exceed 50 µm. On FFA, drusen locations correspond to pinpoint early hyperfluorescence without dye leakage. Hard cuticular drusen are considered a relatively benign manifestation of the disease, with the 5-year risk of progression to advanced AMD not exceeding 1.3% [18].

Soft drusen form as a result of large-volume deposition of drusenoid material beneath the RPE. The presence of at least one large drusen (>125 µm) defines progression of the disease to the intermediate stage. On fundus biomicroscopy, drusen are visible as large yellowish lesions in the macula with indistinct margins. On OCT scans, they are identified as localized RPE detachments (avascular, drusenoid pigment epithelial detachments) with medium-reflective content. On FFA, they are characterized by late, faint hyperfluorescence without dye pooling/leakage, or they may be hypofluorescent. The risk of disease progression to late-stage AMD in the presence of unilateral intermediate AMD is 18%, and for bilateral disease, 27% [18].

Reticular drusen (reticular pseudodrusen) represent a distinct phenotype and are associated with the deposition of drusenoid material above the RPE. This type of drusen is virtually undetectable on fundus biomicroscopy. On OCT scans, they present as medium-reflective material above the RPE appearing as conical projections towards the neurosensory retina. Reticular drusen are barely visible on FFA. Fundus autofluorescence (where they appear as hypoautofluorescent foci) and infrared reflectance imaging are the most informative diagnostic modalities. Reticular drusen are associated with an increased risk of progression to late-stage AMD [8].

Confluent drusen are a sign of disease progression. They form a larger avascular RPE detachment. Avascular RPE detachment can be serous or drusenoid, depending on the reflectivity of the material beneath the detached RPE.

Over time, drusen may undergo the following dynamic changes:

  • Hard drusen may enlarge and transform into soft drusen;

  • Soft drusen may also enlarge, forming confluent drusen (avascular RPE detachments);

  • Calcifications may develop within drusen, appearing as glistening crystals on ophthalmoscopy;

  • Spontaneous regression of drusen may occur, which can be associated with progression of the disease to advanced AMD [19].

Macular pigmentary changes are also a manifestation of AMD. The appearance of hyperpigmented areas is associated with RPE cell migration and is considered one of the predisposing factors for CNV development.

GA develops as a result of dry AMD progression. In GA, the RPE is primarily affected; in addition, degeneration of the choriocapillaris and outer retinal layers occurs. On fundus biomicroscopy, areas of GA appear as well-circumscribed patches of depigmentation with clearly visible large choroidal vessels. OCT scans show thinning of the neurosensory retina, thinning and disruption of the RPE band, increased penetration of the scanning beam into the underlying tissues (hypertransmission), and potential outer retinal tubulation (loss of photoreceptor architecture in response to disruption of RPE adhesion). On FFA, atrophic zones appear as areas of "window defect" hyperfluorescence with sharp borders. GA is associated with significant, irreversible loss of central vision [6].

Wet AMD is characterized by the development of CNV – the proliferation of new vessels through defects in Bruch's membrane beneath the RPE or beneath the neurosensory retina. Detecting signs of CNV activity is crucial when deciding to initiate/resume treatment of a patient with wet AMD with intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, as well as when considering photodynamic therapy (in specific forms of wet AMD) or laser photocoagulation (for extrafoveal CNV when anti-VEGF therapy is not feasible). Signs of activity may include decreased visual acuity secondary to this condition and/or deteriorating anatomical parameters: the appearance of macular hemorrhages (including hemorrhagic RPE or neurosensory retinal detachments) and/or the appearance/increase of intraretinal fluid (neurosensory retinal edema) and/or the appearance/increase of subretinal fluid (neurosensory retinal detachment) and/or the appearance/increase of sub-RPE fluid and/or dye leakage on FFA.

OCT is the most informative modality for detecting retinal changes characteristic of active CNV (pathological fluid collections).

The presence and expansion of CNV may persist for a long time without exudative activity.

Based on anatomical location, CNV is classified into the following types:

  • Type 1 CNV: localized beneath the RPE (corresponds to occult CNV in the FFA-based classification);

  • Type 2 CNV: localized above the RPE (corresponds to classic CNV in the FFA-based classification);

Type 1 CNV (occult CNV) is suspected when fundus biomicroscopy reveals pigmentary changes; the degree of retinal thickening can vary, depending on the presence of intra- and/or subretinal fluid and the height of the fibrovascular pigment epithelial detachment (PED). OCT scans show a neovascular PED and possible signs of CNV activity. Depending on the extent of CNV beneath the detached RPE, it is classified as a fibrovascular PED (the PED is filled with CNV tissue) or a serous neovascular PED (the detachment forms as a result of transudation from neovascular vessels). FFA reveals stippled hyperfluorescence without an identifiable source of leakage, and the CNV vascular network is not clearly delineated. In active CNV, the intensity of hyperfluorescence increases due to fluorescein leakage. The neovascular network is well visualized on OCTA, except in cases where the CNV is located beneath a high serous neovascular PED.

Type 2 CNV (classic CNV) manifests on fundus biomicroscopy as a prominent, elevated grayish lesion beneath the neurosensory retina. OCT scans demonstrate a spindle-shaped hyperreflective lesion above the RPE line, with possible signs of CNV activity. On FFA, the neovascular network is well defined, with bright, homogeneous hyperfluorescence observed as the transit progresses. In cases of active CNV, pronounced fluorescein leakage from the neovascular vessels intensifies throughout the study. OCTA clearly delineates the neovascular network above the RPE.

Mixed CNV is categorized into predominantly classic (where the classic component accounts for at least 50% of the total lesion area) and minimally classic (classic component is present, but comprises less than 50% of the total lesion area).

Type 3 CNV includes retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP), which is characterized by the initiation of neovascularization within the retinal vascular plexus, followed by the formation of CNV and a retinochoroidal anastomosis. Early RAP is invisible on fundus biomicroscopy. A combination of reticular drusen, drusenoid PED, and a hyperreflective focus at its apex (on OCT) warrants high clinical suspicion. Progression of retinal vessel proliferation is accompanied by hemorrhages, neurosensory retinal edema, and hard exudates. As it progresses, RAP acquires clinical features similar to Type 1 CNV. Informative diagnostic modalities include OCTA and FFA.

PCV is clinically similar to type 1 CNV, but differs in a more severe course, a tendency to subretinal hemorrhages, diffuse RPE damage, and choroidal thickening. OCT and OCT-A are informative imaging methods for abnormal choroidal vessels, which reveal typical signs of PCV: RPE protrusions with visualization of polyps, the "double-layer" sign (separate visualization of Bruch's membrane and the RPE), and choroidal thickening.

A scar-atrophic focus is formed at the final stage of CNV development. Ophthalmoscopy reveals a round, grey-white lesion, often with pigment deposition. This clinical picture is associated with irreversible central vision loss and an unfavorable prognosis for treatment.

2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods

Criteria for diagnosing AMD *

AMD stage

Criteria

No AMD

no changes or a small number of small drusen (diameter <63 microns)

Early AMD

multiple small drusen, a small number of medium-sized drusen (diameter from 63 to 124 microns), or initial changes in the retinal RPE

Intermediate AMD

numerous medium-sized drusen, at least one large drusen (diameter ≥ 125 microns), or GA not involving the fovea

Atrophic AMD (late AMD)

presence of GA involving the central zone of the fundus

Neovascular (wet) AMD

(late AMD)

·        presence of CNV with various manifestations (intra- and/or subretinal fluid and/or neovascular RPE detachment, hemorrhage, hard (lipid) exudates, etc.);

·       scar-atrophic changes in the macula (outcome of wet AMD)

Note: * - using AREDS recommendations [18].

2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis

It is recommended to collect complaints from all patients in order to identify symptoms that may affect the choice of management tactics [1, 17].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: in early AMD, there are no complaints. In intermediate AMD, there are no complaints or there may be complaints of some decrease in vision, distortion of straight lines (metamorphopsia), and missing letters when reading. In wet AMD, complaints of pronounced decrease in visual acuity, line distortion (metamorphopsia), and reading difficulties are characteristic. In atrophic AMD, patients complain of a significant decrease in visual acuity and the inability to read.

It is recommended to take a medical history from all patients in order to identify facts that may affect the choice of management tactics [1, 17].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: it is necessary to find out about cases of AMD among close relatives, smoking status, and the presence of concomitant ocular and systemic diseases in order to identify risk factors for AMD progression and assess the risk of complications from intravitreal drug administration.

2.2 Physical Examination

It is not recommended to perform a physical examination in patients for the purpose of diagnosing and monitoring AMD [1].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

It is recommended to refer patients with concomitant systemic diseases and risk factors for systemic complications to specialized specialists for consultation prior to intravitreal administration of an anti-angiogenic medicinal product in order to identify possible contraindications to this type of treatment or minimize the risk of complications [1,20].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: the choice of specialist profile is determined depending on the patient's concomitant systemic disease and risk factors for systemic complications.

2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics

There are no diagnostic criteria for AMD based on clinical laboratory test data.

It is recommended to perform a complete blood count, a comprehensive biochemical blood test (measurement of total protein, glucose, and urea, levels of creatinine, levels of total bilirubin, levels of conjugated (direct) bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase activity, alanine aminotransferase activity, alkaline phosphatase activity, cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides, coagulogram (basic hemostasis screening), urinalysis, detection of antibodies to Treponema pallidum by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) in blood, detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in blood, detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus in blood, qualitative detection of human immunodeficiency virus RNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), for all patients with AMD during preparation for intravitreal drug administration or hospitalization for other purposes, with frequency according to current federal, regional, and local regulatory documents, to assess general status, identify comorbidities and possible contraindications to these treatments, and minimize the risk of complications [20,21,22,23].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: the examination is carried out on the basis of voluntary consent (sanitary and epidemiological rules SP 3.1.5.2826-10 "Prevention of HIV infection"). The choice of laboratory test is determined based on the presence of concomitant systemic disease and risk factors for systemic complications in the patient.

2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics

It is recommended to perform visometry in all patients with AMD during disease diagnosis, dynamic monitoring, and treatment control to assess the functional state of the central retinal zone [1, 17].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform refractometry (or determine refraction using a trial lens set) in all patients with AMD during disease diagnosis, dynamic monitoring, and treatment control to determine the best corrected visual acuity for an accurate assessment of visual impairment severity [1].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform ophthalmotonometry in all patients with AMD during disease diagnosis, dynamic monitoring, and treatment control to detect intraocular pressure abnormalities [1, 17].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform ocular biomicroscopy in all patients with AMD during disease diagnosis, dynamic monitoring, and treatment control to assess the state of ocular media and structures [1, 17];

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform fundus biomicroscopy or ophthalmoscopy under conditions of medical mydriasis (using anticholinergics and sympathomimetics, excluding antiglaucoma drugs, including fixed combinations) in all patients with AMD during disease diagnosis, dynamic monitoring, and treatment control to detect fundus changes, assess their severity, monitor, and select the optimal management tactics [1, 17].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

It is recommended to perform fundus biomicrophotography using a fundus camera (if technically available) under conditions of medical mydriasis (using anticholinergics and sympathomimetics, excluding antiglaucoma drugs, including fixed combinations) in all patients with AMD during disease diagnosis, dynamic monitoring, and treatment control to objectify the treatment and diagnostic process [24].

GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comments: the necessity and frequency of fundus biomicrophotography using a fundus camera is determined by the ophthalmologist depending on the course of the disease.

It is recommended to perform fundus autofluorescence imaging (if technically available) in patients with suspected RPE lesions during disease diagnosis, dynamic monitoring, and treatment control to detect and monitor RPE changes [25].

GCR CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3)

It is recommended to perform optical imaging of the retina using a computer analyzer (also known as optical coherence tomography, OCT) (if technically available) in patients with AMD during disease diagnosis, dynamic monitoring, and treatment control to detect fundus changes, signs of CNV activity, determine patient management tactics, and evaluate treatment results [26].

GCR ALEL 1Grade of Recommendations A (Level of Evidence – 1)

Comments: when assessing CNV activity and determining indications for treatment with intravitreal anti-angiogenic medicinal products, quantitative and qualitative parameters of the tomogram should be evaluated, including a differentiated approach to analyzing the effect of pathological fluid of various localizations on vision.

It is recommended to perform fluorescein angiography (FA) under conditions of medical mydriasis (using anticholinergics and sympathomimetics, excluding antiglaucoma drugs, including fixed combinations) in patients in diagnostically challenging cases (if technically available) during disease diagnosis, dynamic monitoring, and treatment control for differential diagnosis of the disease, clarification of the presence of wet AMD, detection of additional criteria for CNV activity, and decision-making on management tactics [27].

GCR ALOE 2Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence – 2)

Comments: the necessity and frequency of FA is determined by the ophthalmologist depending on the course of the disease.

It is recommended to perform optical examination of the retina using a computer analyzer in angiography mode (also known as optical coherence tomography angiography, OCT-A) (if technically feasible) in patients with the wet form of AMD, as well as in diagnostically complex cases, at the diagnostic stage, during regular follow-up and treatment monitoring, for morphometric evaluation of CNV and vascular malformations, taking into account the segmentation of fundus structures [28].

GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: the necessity and frequency of OCT-A are determined by the ophthalmologist based on the specific clinical course of the disease.

It is recommended to perform ultrasound examination of the eyeball in patients with AMD when the optical media are insufficiently transparent, in order to assess the condition of the ocular media and membranes [29].

GRC CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Comments: the necessity and frequency of ultrasound examination are determined by the ophthalmologist based on the specific clinical course of the disease.

It is recommended to perform computer perimetry in patients with AMD when an in-depth analysis of functional impairments is required during diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment monitoring, in order to assess light sensitivity and visual field defects [17].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: the necessity and frequency of computer perimetry are determined by the ophthalmologist based on the specific clinical course of the disease. Additionally, for screening and self-monitoring by patients to detect visual field defects, scotometry (Amsler-Marintchev test) can be used.

It is recommended to perform electroretinography in patients with AMD when an in-depth analysis of functional impairments is required, in order to assess the electrical activity of the retina [30].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: the necessity and frequency of electroretinography are determined by the ophthalmologist based on the specific clinical course of the disease.

2.5 Other Procedures

It is recommended to perform chest fluorography (or digital chest fluorography) or chest radiography (or digital chest radiography) in all patients with AMD as part of the preparation for intravitreal drug administration or hospitalization for other reasons, with a frequency complying with current federal, regional, and local regulatory documents, to assess general status, identify comorbid conditions and potential contraindications to these treatment modalities, and minimize the risk of complications [20,21,22,23].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

It is recommended to record an electrocardiogram (with interpretation, description, and analysis of electrographic data) in all patients with AMD as part of the preparation for intravitreal drug administration or hospitalization for other reasons, with a frequency complying with current federal, regional, and local regulatory documents, to assess general status, identify comorbid conditions and potential contraindications to these treatment modalities, and minimize the risk of complications [20,21,22,23].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management

3.1 Conservative Treatment

It is not recommended to administer specific treatment to patients with early-stage AMD [18].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: it is necessary to eliminate risk factors for disease progression: smoking cessation, enriching the daily diet with foods rich in natural antioxidants (specifically lutein and zeaxanthin) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (a special therapeutic diet is not required), maintaining physical activity, wearing sunglasses, and managing comorbid somatic pathologies (hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis, diabetes mellitus, etc.) in collaboration with physicians of other specialties [11, 14, 15, 16, 31, 32, 33]. If risk factors for disease progression are present, the prescription of multivitamins combined with other agents optimized for retinal diseases may be indicated [32, 33].

It is recommended to prescribe multivitamins and other agents, whose composition is optimized for retinal diseases (including those containing lutein and zeaxanthin) in periodic courses according to the instructions, for patients with intermediate AMD or late AMD in the fellow eye, in order to reduce the risk of progression to the late stage and stabilize visual functions [18, 34].

Level of Evidence AGrade of Evidence 2Level of Recommendations A (Grade of Evidence – 2)

Comments: according to the AREDS study, the use of an antioxidant vitamin and mineral supplement in patients at high risk of progression to the late stage with a high risk of vision loss (intermediate AMD or late AMD in the fellow eye) was associated with a 25% reduction in the rate of progression and a significant reduction in vision loss by 19% [18].

It is recommended to prescribe multivitamins and other agents whose composition is optimized for retinal diseases (including those containing lutein and zeaxanthin) and/or physiotherapy in periodic courses for patients with the atrophic form of AMD, in order to maintain residual visual functions [17].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: currently, there is no effective treatment for the atrophic form of AMD. Proposed treatment methods aim to slow down the progression of visual acuity loss.

3.2 Laser Treatment

It is recommended to perform focal laser photocoagulation of the fundus under local anesthesia (using a local anesthetic solution under conditions of pharmacological mydriasis using anticholinergics and sympathomimetics, excluding antiglaucoma drugs, including fixed combinations) in patients with the wet form of AMD in cases of extrafoveal CNV location and when anti-angiogenic intravitreal drug therapy is unfeasible, with the aim of destroying pathological vessels and stabilizing or improving best-corrected visual acuity [34].

GPR BLEL 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 2)

Comments: in cases of laser photocoagulation of newly formed vessels, a high risk of CNV recurrence should be taken into account. Prior to laser photocoagulation, precise determination of the size and location of the CNV is required based on comprehensive examination results, including FA, OCT, and potentially OCT-A. Focal laser photocoagulation of the fundus in wet AMD is inferior in efficacy to intravitreal anti-angiogenic therapy and requires regular follow-up of the patient after the intervention.

It is recommended to perform photodynamic therapy under conditions of pharmacological mydriasis (using anticholinergics and sympathomimetics, excluding antiglaucoma drugs, including fixed combinations) for forms of AMD resistant to anti-angiogenic drug therapy, including polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV), with the aim of inducing occlusion of pathological vessels and stabilizing or improving best-corrected visual acuity [35].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: photodynamic therapy can be performed as an alternative method or in combination with intravitreal anti-angiogenic drug therapy.

It is recommended to perform nanosecond laser retinal stimulation under conditions of pharmacological mydriasis (using anticholinergics and sympathomimetics, excluding antiglaucoma drugs, including fixed combinations) in intermediate AMD with a predicted high risk of progression to the late stage, in order to reduce drusen area, improve macular function, and slow down disease progression [36].

GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)

Comments: nanosecond laser retinal stimulation is performed using transpupillary laser application at the macular periphery using a specialized laser system with a wavelength of 532 nm, a pulse duration of 3 nanoseconds, and a spot size of 400 µm. Short nanosecond laser pulses stimulate retinal pigment epithelium cells, triggering their regeneration and restoring disrupted mechanisms of molecular transport between the retina and choroid, while increasing the permeability of Bruch's membrane. Thermal tissue damage is avoided.

3.3 Surgical Treatment

It is recommended to perform intravitreal administration (in an operating room setting, under local anesthesia using a local anesthetic solution, after treating the skin of the eyelids, periorbital area, and ocular surface with an antiseptic and disinfectant solution) of an anti-angiogenic medicinal product—ranibizumab** [37], or aflibercept** [37], or brolucizumab** [38], or faricimab [39]—in patients with the neovascular (wet) form of AMD, with injection frequencies in accordance with the instructions for use of the administered medicinal product, in order to suppress CNV activity, stabilize or improve best-corrected visual acuity (Appendix A3, Table 4).

Level of Recommendations: BLevel of Evidence: 2Level of recommendations B (level of evidence – 2)

Comments: currently, intravitreal administration of an anti-angiogenic medicinal product is the first-line therapy for wet AMD.

  • Ranibizumab** is a humanized antibody fragment directed against vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A). It selectively binds to VEGF-A (VEGF110, VEGF121, VEGF165), preventing its interaction with receptors on the surface of endothelial cells, which leads to the suppression of neovascularization and endothelial cell proliferation [40].

  • Aflibercept** is a recombinant fusion protein consisting of extracellular domain fragments of human VEGF receptors fused to the Fc portion of human immunoglobulin G. It acts as a soluble decoy receptor that binds VEGF-A and placental growth factor with higher affinity than their natural receptors, and thus can inhibit the binding and activation of VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 receptors by multiple growth factors involved in pathological angiogenesis [41]. According to clinical trial results, the intervals between aflibercept** injections can be extended up to 16 weeks while maintaining the achieved visual acuity [41].

  • Brolucizumab** is a humanized single-chain antibody fragment (scFv, single-chain variable fragment) with a molecular weight of 26 kDa, which is the smallest functional antibody unit. This allows a higher molar dose to be administered compared to previously approved anti-VEGF antibodies, with the potential for a longer duration of action than ranibizumab and higher tissue penetration, as confirmed by preclinical data [39]. Brolucizumab** binds with high affinity to various isoforms of VEGF-A (specifically VEGF110, VEGF121, and VEGF165), thereby preventing VEGF-A from binding to its receptors VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2.

Faricimab is a humanized bispecific antibody belonging to the immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) class, which acts by inhibiting two distinct pathways, neutralizing both Ang-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor A. Ang-2 decreases vascular stability by promoting endothelial destabilization, pericyte loss, and pathological angiogenesis, thereby increasing vascular leakage and inflammation. It also sensitizes blood vessels to the activity of VEGF-A, leading to their further destabilization. Ang-2 and VEGF-A act synergistically to increase vascular permeability and stimulate neovascularization. Dual inhibition of Ang-2 and VEGF-A by faricimab reduces vascular permeability and inflammation, suppresses pathological angiogenesis, and restores vascular stability [39; 43; 44].

The prospects of therapy directly depend on its timely initiation and adherence to an optimal injection regimen based on regular dynamic monitoring.

When treating with ranibizumab**, initially 3 or more consecutive monthly intravitreal injections of the medicinal product may be required until maximum stable visual acuity is achieved and/or until signs and symptoms of disease activity disappear (no improvement in visual acuity and/or retinal anatomical parameters within 1 month after the last monthly injection). Once stabilization is achieved, the frequency of follow-up examinations and the interval between intravitreal ranibizumab injections are determined by the physician based on the clinical presentation. An interval of at least 4 weeks should be maintained between injections into the same eye.

When treating with aflibercept**, it is recommended to start with three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections of the medicinal product, followed by the next injection 2 months later. Thereafter, the 2-month intervals between injections can be maintained or extended using a treat-and-extend regimen based on the treating physician's assessment of changes in visual acuity and/or anatomical parameters. When using the treat-and-extend regimen, 2 or 4 weeks are added to subsequent injection intervals to maintain the achieved stable visual acuity and/or anatomical parameters. In case of deterioration in visual acuity and/or anatomical parameters, the injection intervals should be shortened accordingly to a minimum of 2 months. After 12 months of treatment, the frequency of status monitoring and treatment is determined by the physician depending on the course of the disease.

When treating with brolucizumab**, the first 3 doses are administered as intravitreal injections at 4-week intervals (monthly). Thereafter, the physician may individualize injection intervals based on disease activity, assessed by visual acuity and/or anatomical parameters. Disease activity should be assessed 16 weeks (4 months) after the start of therapy. In patients without signs of disease activity, intravitreal administration of the drug is performed every 12 weeks (3 months). In patients with signs of disease activity, administration is performed every 8 weeks (2 months). Subsequently, the physician may adjust injection intervals for each individual patient based on disease activity.

Faricimab treatment is initiated with 4 loading doses administered intravitreally every 4 weeks. Following the loading phase, the subsequent maintenance dosing regimen will be based on anatomical features and visual function characteristics determining the disease course. Assessment of treatment response is recommended at week 20 after the first injection, with a potential re-evaluation at week 24 after the first injection, allowing for individualized therapy depending on the presence or absence of signs of disease activity. In the absence of disease progression, intravitreal injections are recommended every 16 weeks, whereas if signs of progression appear, every 8 or 12 weeks. Follow-up time points to assess the patient's condition are determined at the physician's discretion based on the patient's complaints and general condition; monthly examinations are not required. Subsequently, the physician may adjust injection intervals individually for each patient based on disease activity [39; 43; 44].

In each clinical case, the final decision regarding indications for anti-angiogenic therapy and the choice of the intravitreal injection regimen is made by the physician based on the evaluation of the clinical presentation and disease course.

Prevention of visual acuity decline, even in the absence of its improvement, should be considered a positive outcome compared to the natural history of the disease.

During intravitreal administration of an anti-angiogenic medicinal product, the potential risk of complications such as infectious endophthalmitis, non-infectious intraocular inflammation, iatrogenic cataract, hemophthalmus, retinal detachment, and others must be taken into account.

Contraindications to intravitreal administration of ranibizumab**, or aflibercept**, or brolucizumab**, or faricimab:

- hypersensitivity to the components of the drug;

- active confirmed or suspected ocular infections or periocular infections;

- active intraocular inflammatory process;

- pregnancy and breastfeeding period.

It is recommended to perform intravitreal administration (in an operating room setting, under local anesthesia using a local anesthetic solution, after treating the skin of the eyelids, periorbital area, and ocular surface with an antiseptic and disinfectant solution) of an enzymatic medicinal product—prourokinase**—in patients with wet AMD and massive subretinal hemorrhage in the macular region in order to accelerate its resorption [45].

GRC CLeE 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)

Contraindications to intravitreal administration of prourokinase:

- individual hypersensitivity to the drug components;

- conditions with a high risk of bleeding, including blood disorders;

- active confirmed or suspected ocular infections or periocular infectious processes;

- active intraocular inflammatory process;

- pregnancy and breastfeeding;

- chronic renal failure (serum creatinine level > 0.02 g/L, urea > 0.5 g/L);

- severe hepatocellular failure (blood albumin < 30 g/L).

It is recommended to instill antimicrobial eye drops (antiseptics and disinfectants) into the conjunctival sac before and after intravitreal administration of any medicinal product to prevent infectious complications [20].

GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)

Comments: the duration of antimicrobial instillation (antiseptics and disinfectants) before and after intravitreal administration of any medicinal product is determined by the physician based on a comprehensive assessment of the risk of infectious complications and the condition of the ocular surface.

3.4 Dietary Therapy

It is not recommended to prescribe a special therapeutic diet for patients with AMD [31,32].

GGR BLOC 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence – 3).

Comments: it is recommended to include foods rich in natural antioxidants, particularly lutein, zeaxanthin, and polyunsaturated fatty acids, in the daily diet.

4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment

It is recommended to select prescription glasses for vision correction (including glasses with additional magnification and built-in monoculars, and special information access devices for visually impaired patients) for patients with low vision in order to improve their quality of life and social adaptation [17].

GGR CLOC 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation

It is recommended to eliminate risk factors for the disease: smoking cessation, enriching the daily diet with foods rich in natural antioxidants, particularly lutein, zeaxanthin, and polyunsaturated fatty acids (no special therapeutic diet is required), maintaining physical activity, and using sunglasses in older age groups to prevent the development and progression of AMD [31,32].

GGR CLOC 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

It is recommended that older individuals with no signs of AMD or with early-stage AMD undergo an ophthalmologist's examination (visit, consultation) once a year for early detection of disease development or progression [8,10,12].

GPP CLoE 3Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 3).

It is recommended to perform a routine ophthalmological examination (visit, consultation) for patients with intermediate or late stages of AMD, or in the presence of risk factors for disease progression, for dynamic monitoring of changes and timely prescription of adequate treatment if necessary. The frequency of visits to the physician is determined individually depending on the planned management strategy and the specific clinical manifestations [1,17].

GGR CLOC 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5).

6. Organization of Medical Care

Primary specialized health care is provided by an ophthalmologist in the outpatient department of a medical organization.

Treatment (laser intervention, intravitreal administration of an anti-angiogenic medicinal product, conservative medical treatment, or physiotherapy) is performed by an ophthalmologist in an outpatient setting, a day hospital, or an inpatient setting.

Indication for planned hospitalization in a medical organization:

- the need for intravitreal administration of an anti-angiogenic medicinal product and/or laser treatment and/or medical treatment and/or physiotherapy when outpatient treatment is not feasible.

Indication for emergency hospitalization in a medical organization:

- endophthalmitis as a complication of intravitreal administration of an anti-angiogenic medicinal product [46].

Indication for patient discharge from a medical organization:

1) completion of treatment or one of the stages of specialized, including high-tech, medical care in a 24-hour or day hospital, provided there are no complications of treatment requiring medical correction and/or inpatient medical interventions;

2) refusal of the patient or their legal representative from specialized, including high-tech, medical care in an inpatient or day-care setting;

3) need to transfer the patient to another medical organization.

7. Additional Information

The risk of disease progression to the late stage is increased in smoking patients.

The prospects of treatment with intravitreal anti-angiogenic medicinal products in patients with wet AMD depend on timely initiation of treatment and compliance with the optimal injection regimen in accordance with the drug prescribing information and clinical guidelines based on regular follow-up data.

The most significant manifestations of the disease at the late stage, causing a significant decrease in visual functions, are the development of subretinal fibrosis, massive hemorrhages, and macular atrophy involving the fovea.

Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care

Criteria for assessing the quality of primary health care in adults with age-related macular degeneration (ICD-10 codes: H35.3)

No.

Quality assessment criteria

Evaluation of compliance

1.       

Initial ophthalmologist examination (evaluation, consultation)

Yes/No

2.       

Visometry was performed

Yes/No

3.       

Ocular biomicroscopy performed

Yes/No

4.       

Fundus biomicroscopy and/or ophthalmoscopy was performed

Yes/No

Criteria for assessing the quality of specialized medical care in adults with age-related macular degeneration (ICD-10 codes: H35.3)

No.

Quality assessment criteria

Evaluation of compliance

1.       

Visometry was performed

Yes/No

2.       

Ocular biomicroscopy performed

Yes/No

3.       

Fundus biomicroscopy and/or ophthalmoscopy was performed

Yes/No

4.       

Intravitreal administration of medicinal products (anti-angiogenic medicinal products and/or enzyme preparations) and/or focal laser photocoagulation of the fundus, and/or treatment with multivitamins + other agents was performed (depending on medical indications and in the absence of medical contraindications)

Yes/No

References

Show references
  1. American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Patterns Committee. Preferred Practice Pattern® Guidelines. Comprehensive Adult Medical Eye Evaluation. San Francisco, CA: AAO (2005). Available at: http://www.aao.org/ppp.

  2. Sobrin L., Seddon J. M. Nature and nurture-genes and environment-predict onset and progression of macular degeneration / Progress in retinal and eye research. – 2014. – Vol. 40. – P. 1-15.

  3. Nita M. et al. Age-related macular degeneration in the aspect of chronic low-grade inflammation (pathophysiological parainflammation) / Mediators of inflammation. – 2014.  DOI: 10.1155 / 2014/930671

  4. Beatty S. et al. The role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration / Survey of ophthalmology. – 2000. – Vol. 45. № 2. – P. 115-134.

  5. Nita M. et al. Age-related macular degeneration and changes in the extracellular matrix / Medical science monitor: international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. – 2014. – Vol. 20. – P. 1003.

  6. Arya M. et al. Choriocapillaris changes in dry age-related macular degeneration and geographic atrophy: a review / Eye and Vision. – 2018. – Vol. 5.  № 1. – P. 1-7.

  7. Wong W. L. et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis  / The Lancet Global Health. – 2014. – Vol. 2.  № 2. – P. 106-116.

  8. Klein R. et al. Ten-year incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy: The Beaver Dam eye study / Ophthalmology. – 2002. – Vol. 109.  № 10. – P. 1767-1779.

  9. Neroev, V.V. Russian observational epidemiological non-interventional study of patients with wet age-related macular degeneration / V.V. Neroev // Russian Ophthalmological Journal. – 2011. – No. 2. – P. 4–9.

  10. Friedman D. S. et al. Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States / Arch ophthalmol. – 2004. – Vol. 122.  № 4. – P. 564-572.

  11. Velilla S. et al. Smoking and age-related macular degeneration: review and update / Journal of ophthalmology. – 2013. DOI: 10.1155/2013/895147

  12. Rudnicka A. R. et al. Age and gender variations in age-related macular degeneration prevalence in populations of European ancestry: a meta-analysis / Ophthalmology. – 2012. – Vol. 119. № 3. – P. 571-580.

  13. Ratnapriya R., Chew E. Y. Age‐related macular degeneration—clinical review and genetics update / Clinical genetics. – 2013. – Vol. 84.  № 2. – P. 160-166.

  14. Chakravarthy U. et al. Clinical risk factors for age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review and meta-analysis / BMC ophthalmology. – 2010. – Vol. 10. № 1. – P. 31.

  15. Erke M. G. et al. Cardiovascular risk factors associated with age‐related macular degeneration: the Tromso Study / Acta ophthalmologica. – 2014. – Vol. 92.  № 7. – P. 662-669.

  16. Tomany S.C. et al. Risk factors for incident age-related macular degeneration: pooled findings from 3 continents / Ophthalmology. –  2004. –  Vol. 111. № 7. – P. 1280-1287.

  17. Ophthalmology: National Guidelines / ed. by S.E. Avetisov, E.A. Egorov, L.K. Moshetova, V.V. Neroev, Kh.P. Takhchidi. – 2nd ed. – M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2018. – 904 p. – (National Guidelines Series)

  18. Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group A randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of high-dose supplementation with vitamins C and E, beta carotene, and zinc for age-related macular degeneration and vision loss: AREDS report no. 8 / Archives of ophthalmology. – 2001. – Vol. 119. № 10. – P. 1417. 

  19. García-Layana A. et al. Early and intermediate age-related macular degeneration: update and clinical review / Clinical Interventions in Aging. – 2017. – Vol. 12. – P. 1579.

  20. Neroev V.V., Astakhov Yu.S., Korotkikh S.A., Bobykin E.V., Zaitseva O.V., Lisochkina A.B., Brovkina A.F., Budzinskaya M.V., Gatsu M.V., Grigorieva N.N., Izmailov A.S., Karlova E.V., Kovalevskaya M.A., Nechiporenko P.A., Panova I.E., Ryabtseva A.A., Simonova S.V., Tultseva S.N., Fursova A.Zh., Shadrichev F.E., Shishkin M.M., Kharlampidi M.P. Protocol for intravitreal administration of medicinal products. Consensus of the Expert Council on Retinal and Optic Nerve Diseases of the All-Russian Public Organization "Association of Ophthalmologists". Annals of Ophthalmology. 2020;136(6):251–263. https://doi.org/10.17116/oftalma2020136062251.

  21. SanPiN 2.1.3.2630-10 "Sanitary and epidemiological requirements for medical organizations".

  22. Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation No. 786n dated December 29, 2008 "On the procedure for forming and approving the state assignment for the provision of high-tech medical care to citizens of the Russian Federation at the expense of federal budget allocations in 2009" (as amended).

  23. Management of planned hospitalization in a multidisciplinary hospital. Methodological recommendations No. 2001/144 : (approved by the Ministry of Health of the RF on 09.11.2001).

  24. Grassmann F. et al. Deep Learning Algorithm for Prediction of Age-Related Eye Disease Study Severity Scale for Age-Related Macular Degeneration from Color Fundus Photography / Ophthalmology. – 2018. – Vol. 125. № 9. – P. 1410-1420.

  25. Ly A. et al. Fundus autofluorescence in age-related macular degeneration / Optometry and Vision Science. – 2017. – Vol. 94. № 2. – P. 246.

  26. Castillo M. M. et al. Optical coherence tomography for the monitoring of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review / Ophthalmology. – 2015. – Vol. 122. № 2. – P. 399-406.

  27. Wilde C. et al. The diagnostic accuracy of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a comparison with fundus fluorescein angiography. Eye (Lond).  – 2015. – Vol. 29. № 5. – P. 602-609.

  28. Roisman L., Goldhardt R. OCT Angiography: an upcoming non-invasive tool for diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration / Current ophthalmology reports. – 2017. – Vol. 5. № 2. – P. 136-140.

  29. Ultrasound diagnostics in ophthalmology: a guide for physicians / ed. by V.V. Neroev, T.N. Kiseleva. – 1st edition. – M.: IKAR Publishing House, 2019. - 322 p.

  30. Zueva, M.V. Electroretinography in the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration / I.V. Tsapenko, M.V. Ryabina, M.I. Grinchenko, N.V. Neroeva // Annals of Ophthalmology. – 2009. – Vol. 125. No. 4. – P. 54-58.

  31. Chapman N. A. et al. Role of diet and food intake in age‐related macular degeneration: a systematic review / Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. – 2019. – Vol. 47. № 1. – P. 106-127.

  32. Amirul Islam F. M. et al. Dietary patterns and their associations with age-related macular degeneration: the Melbourne collaborative cohort study / Ophthalmology. – 2014. – Vol. 121. № 7. – P. 1428-1434.

  33. Zajac-Pytrus H. M. et al. The dry form of age-related macular degeneration (AMD): the current concepts of pathogenesis and prospects for treatment / Adv Clin Exp Med – 2015. – Vol. 24. № 6. – P. 1099-1104.

  34. Macular Photocoagulation Study Group. Argon laser photocoagulation for neovascular maculopathy. Five-year results from randomized clinical trials / Archives of  ophthalmology. – 1991. – Vol. 109. – P. 1109–1114.

  35. TAP Study Group. Improvement after verteporfin therapy / Archives of  ophthalmology. – 2003. – Vol. 121. – P. 415.

  36. Guymer RH, Brassington KH, Dimitrov P, Makeyeva G, Plunkett M, Xia W, Chauhan D, Vingrys A, Luu CD. Nanosecond-laser application in intermediate AMD: 12-month results of fundus appearance and macular function. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2013 11 Nov 2013. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12247

  37. Nguyen C.L. et al. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials / BMC Ophthalmology – 2018. – Vol. 30  № 18(1). – P.130.

  38. Dugel P.U., et al. HAWK and HARRIER: Ninety-six-week outcomes from the phase 3 trials of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration / Ophthalmology – 2021. Vol. 128. № 1. – P. 89-99.

  39. Heier J.S., et al. Efficacy, durability, and safety of intravitreal faricimab up to every 16 weeks for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (TENAYA and LUCERNE): two randomised, double-masked, phase 3, non-inferiority trials / The Lancet - 2022. - Vol. 399. №10326. - P. 729–740. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00010-1

  40. CATT Research Group. Ranibizumab and bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration / New England Journal of Medicine – 2011. – Vol. 364.  № 20. – P. 1897-1908.

  41. Sarwar S.. et al. Aflibercept for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. / Cochrane Database Syst Rev. - 2016. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011346.pub2

  42. Ohji M et al. Efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept treat-and-extend regimens in exudative age-related macular degeneration: 52- and 96-week findings from ALTAIR : A Randomized Controlled Trial / Adv Ther. - 2020. - Vol. 37. №3. - P. 1173-1187. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01236-x

  43. Saharinen P., et al. Therapeutic targeting of the angiopoietin–TIE pathway / Nat Rev Drug Discov - 2017. - Vol. 16. - P. 635–661. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd.2016.278

  44. Sahni J., et al. Safety and efficacy of different doses and regimens of faricimab vs ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. The AVENUE Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial / JAMA Ophthalmol. - 2020. - Vol.138, №9. - P. 955-963. DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2685

  45. Boiko E.V., Danilichev V.F., Sazhin T.G. et al. Methods of clinical application of recombinant prourokinase in ophthalmological practice // RMJ. Clinical Ophthalmology. - 2017. - No. 2. - P. 118–129.

  46. Forooghian F. et al. Comparison of endophthalmitis rates following intravitreal injection of compounded bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept. / Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology – 2017. – Vol. 52.  № 6. – P. 616-619.

Appendix A1. Working Group Composition

  1. Astakhov Yu.S., Group Leader, Doctor of Medical Sciences, Professor at the Department of Ophthalmology with Clinic, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Vice-President of the Association of Ophthalmologists;

  2. Neroev V.V., Academician of the RAS, Professor, Honored Doctor of Russia, Honored Scientist of Russia, Director of the National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases named after Helmholtz of the Ministry of Health of Russia, President of the Association of Ophthalmologists;

  3. Zaitseva O.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Deputy Director of the National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases named after Helmholtz of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Leading Researcher, Executive Director of the Association of Ophthalmologists;

  4. Lisochkina A.B., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor at the Department of Ophthalmology with Clinic, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Member of the Association of Ophthalmologists;

  5. Nechiporenko P.A., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Assistant Professor at the Department of Ophthalmology with Clinic, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Member of the Association of Ophthalmologists;

  6. Okhotsimskaya T.D., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Physician at the National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases named after Helmholtz of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Member of the Association of Ophthalmologists;

  7. Ryabina M.V., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher at the National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases named after Helmholtz of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Member of the Association of Ophthalmologists.

  8. Shadrichev F.E., Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Ophthalmological Department of the Saint Petersburg Territorial Diabetological Center, Assistant Professor at the Department of Ophthalmology with Clinic, Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University, Member of the Association of Ophthalmologists;

No conflict of interest.

Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines

Target audience of these clinical guidelines:

  • Ophthalmologists;

  • General practitioners (family medicine)

Methods used to collect/select evidence: searching in electronic databases; analysis of current scientific developments on the issue of AMD in Russia and abroad; synthesis of practical experience of Russian and foreign specialists. Description of methods used to collect/select evidence: the evidence base for the recommendations includes publications included in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases, as well as monographs and articles in leading specialized peer-reviewed domestic medical journals on this topic. Methods used to assess the quality and strength of evidence: expert consensus, significance assessment in accordance with the rating scheme.

Table 1. Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)

LoE

Definition

1

Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic review of randomized clinical trials using meta-analysis

2

Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except for randomized clinical trials, using meta-analysis

3

Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case report

5

Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available

Table 2. Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, rehabilitation interventions)

LoE

Definitions

1

Systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis

2

Individual randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except for randomized clinical trials using meta-analysis

3

Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies

4

Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies

5

Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available

Table 3. Scale for assessing grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitation interventions)

GoR

Definition

A

Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent)

C

Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

C

Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent)

Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.

The clinical guidelines update mechanism provides for their systematic revision—at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based data regarding the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.

Appendix A3. Reference Materials

1. Current instructions for the medicinal products mentioned in these clinical guidelines can be found at http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru

Table 4. Dosage, route of administration, and treatment regimens of medicinal products

Drug

Dose

Route of administration

Regimen

Ranibizumab**

0.5 mg

(0.05 ml)

Intravitreal administration

Three or more consecutive monthly intravitreal injections until maximum stable visual acuity is achieved and/or until signs and symptoms of disease activity disappear. Subsequently, the injection schedule is determined by the attending physician depending on the clinical presentation. An interval of at least 4 weeks should be maintained between injections into the same eye.

Aflibercept**

2 mg

(0.05 ml)

Intravitreal administration

Three consecutive monthly intravitreal injections, followed by the next injection in 2 months. Subsequently, the two-month intervals between injections can be maintained or extended by 2 or 4 weeks using a treat-and-extend regimen based on the assessment of changes in visual acuity and/or anatomical parameters. After 12 months of treatment, the administration regimen is determined by the attending physician depending on the features of the clinical picture.

Brolucizumab**

6 mg

(0.05 ml)

Intravitreal administration

The first 3 doses are administered as intravitreal injections at 4-week intervals (monthly). Then the physician can individualize the intervals between injections based on disease activity, which is assessed by visual acuity and/or anatomical parameters. Disease activity should be assessed 16 weeks (4 months) after the start of therapy. In patients without signs of disease activity, intravitreal administration of the drug is performed every 12 weeks (3 months). In patients with signs of disease activity, administration is performed every 8 weeks (2 months). Subsequently, the physician may adjust injection intervals individually for each patient based on disease activity.

Faricimab

6 mg

(0.05 ml)

Intravitreal administration

The first 4 doses are administered as intravitreal injections at 4-week intervals (monthly). Following the loading dose period, the subsequent administration regimen will be based on anatomical features and visual function characteristics that determine the course of the disease. Evaluation of the response to therapy is recommended at week 20 after the first injection, with a possible re-evaluation at week 24 after the first injection, which allows individualizing the treatment regimen depending on the presence or absence of signs of disease activity. In the absence of disease progression, intravitreal injections are recommended every 16 weeks, and in the case of signs of progression, every 8 or 12 weeks. Follow-up time points for patient assessment are determined at the physician's discretion based on the patient's complaints and general condition; monthly examinations are not required.

Prourokinase**

lyophilisate for solution for injection, 5 thousand IU

intravitreal administration

500 IU intravitreally as a single dose

2. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10). World Health Organization.

3. Nomenclature of Medical Services. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 804n dated October 13, 2017, "On Approval of the Nomenclature of Medical Services."

4. Federal Law No. 323-FZ "On the Fundamentals of Protecting Citizens' Health in the Russian Federation" dated November 21, 2011.

5. Procedure for Providing Medical Care to the Adult Population for Diseases of the Eye, Its Adnexa, and Orbit. Order of the Ministry of Health of Russia No. 902n dated November 12, 2012, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to the Adult Population for Diseases of the Eye, Its Adnexa, and Orbit."

6. List of Vital and Essential Drugs for Medical Use for 2020. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2406-r dated October 12, 2019, "On Approval of the List of Vital and Essential Drugs for Medical Use for 2020, the list of drugs for medical use, the list of drugs intended for persons with hemophilia, cystic fibrosis, pituitary dwarfism, Gaucher disease, malignant neoplasms of lymphoid, hematopoietic and related tissues, multiple sclerosis, hemolytic-uremic syndrome, juvenile onset arthritis, mucopolysaccharidosis types I, II, and VI, persons after organ and/or tissue transplantation, and the minimum assortment of drugs required for the provision of medical care."

7. SanPiN 2.1.3.2630-10 "Sanitary and Epidemiological Requirements for Organizations Engaged in Medical Activity."

8. Order of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation No. 786n dated December 29, 2008, "On the Procedure for Formation and Approval of the State Assignment for the Provision of High-Tech Medical Care to Citizens of the Russian Federation at the Expense of Federal Budget Appropriations in 2009" (with amendments and additions).

9. Management of Planned Hospitalization in a Multidisciplinary Hospital. Methodological Recommendations No. 2001/144 (approved by the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation on November 9, 2001).

Table 5. Criteria for choosing the management tactics for a patient with AMD

Stage (form) of AMD

Management tactics

Early AMD

Special treatment is not required. Elimination of risk factors is recommended. In the presence of risk factors for disease progression, prescription of multivitamins + other preparations whose composition is optimized for retinal diseases (including those containing lutein and zeaxanthin) is possible.

Intermediate stage of AMD, as well as the presence of late-stage AMD in the fellow eye

Prescription of multivitamins + other preparations whose composition is optimized for retinal diseases (including those containing lutein and zeaxanthin) and/or transpupillary laser application using a nanosecond laser (when predicting a high risk of disease progression)

Late stage of AMD

Atrophic form

Effective treatment does not exist. The use of multivitamins + other preparations and/or medicinal products from the groups of antihypoxants and antioxidants and/or angioprotectors and microcirculation correctors and/or physiotherapeutic treatment methods is possible.

Wet form

In case of CNV activity, intravitreal administration of an anti-angiogenic medicinal product and/or intravitreal administration of an enzymatic preparation and/or focal laser photocoagulation of the fundus and/or photodynamic therapy is recommended.

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Age-related macular degeneration

Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms — Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Appendix C. Patient Information

Older adults are recommended to undergo a preventive ophthalmological examination, including biomicroscopy of the fundus under conditions of mydriasis (dilated pupil), to detect AMD. In the absence of AMD signs or in the presence of early-stage AMD, subsequent ophthalmological examinations are recommended once a year. The risk of occurrence and progression of the disease to the late stage can be reduced by eliminating risk factors, in particular by quitting smoking, following a diet rich in antioxidants (in particular, lutein and zeaxanthin) and polyunsaturated fatty acids, and maintaining an active lifestyle whenever possible.

In the presence of intermediate or late-stage AMD, or in the presence of risk factors for disease progression, the frequency of doctor visits is determined individually depending on the clinical features and planned management tactics. For self-monitoring of disease progression, patients with intermediate AMD or late-stage AMD in the fellow eye are advised to perform scotometry (Amsler-Marinchev test), which consists of identifying defects in the visual field and distortions of straight lines of the drawn grid while fixing gaze on the central mark.

The clinical picture of AMD, the course and prognosis of the disease, and the diagnostic and treatment methods used vary depending on the stage and form of the disease, and the presence of risk factors for its progression. The chronic course of the disease necessitates regular examinations by an ophthalmologist and, in the case of the wet form of AMD, repeated intravitreal administrations of medicinal products (anti-angiogenic drugs). The risk of complications from intravitreal drug administration is minimal, but it exists.

In the case of significant irreversible reduction in visual functions due to late-stage AMD, visual aids for low vision are available to improve the quality of life.

Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools

Not applicable.

ClinRevs Pro690 ₽ per month · cancel anytime

Clinical calculators and scalesRisk calculation, dosing, and scoring using scales from clinical guidelines — online, no registration required.

Open calculators

Answers based on Russian clinical guidelines right in ChatGPT and Claude Connect the WhiteCoat Pro connector, and the assistant will answer based on the guideline "Age-related macular degeneration" and other current Ministry of Health clinical guidelines with a reference to the section, rather than paraphrasing foreign guidelines. Address: mcp.pervoklassno.ru/mcp. How to configure ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for Russian clinical guidelines

Subscribe in 2 minutes

AI Research DigestEvery morning — fresh PubMed articles in your specialty: translation, AI analysis, and link to the original. Reads in four minutes.

Subscribe for 990 ₽

Related clinical guidelines