List of Abbreviations
GS - geriatric syndrome
GH - growth hormone
ASMI - appendicular skeletal muscle mass index
IL-1 - interleukin-1
IL-6 - interleukin-6
BMI – body mass index
IGF-1 - insulin-like growth factor-1
CGA - comprehensive geriatric assessment
CrCl - creatinine clearance
FS - frailty syndrome
DM - diabetes mellitus
GFR – glomerular filtration rate
TGFβ - transforming growth factor beta 1
TSH — thyroid-stimulating hormone
TNF-α - tumor necrosis factor alpha
CKD - chronic kidney disease
COPD - chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
CHF – chronic heart failure
25(OH)D - 25-hydroxyvitamin D (calcidiol)
CKD-EPI - Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation
DEXA - Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
EWGSOP2 - European Working Group on Sarcopenia for Older People 2
FRAX - Fracture risk assessment tool
Terms and Definitions
Autonomy – independence from outside help and the ability to make decisions independently.
Geriatric syndrome – a multifactorial age-associated clinical condition that impairs quality of life, increases the risk of adverse outcomes (death, dependence on outside help, readmissions, need for long-term care) and functional impairments. Unlike a traditional clinical syndrome, a geriatric syndrome is not a manifestation of a pathology in a single organ or body system, but reflects a complex of changes in multiple systems. The occurrence of one geriatric syndrome increases the risk of developing other geriatric syndromes. Geriatric syndromes include: frailty, dementia, delirium, depression, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, osteoporosis, sarcopenia, functional impairment, reduced mobility, balance disorders, dizziness, orthostatic syndrome (orthostatic hypotension, orthostatic tachycardia with or without symptoms), sensory deficits (vision loss, hearing loss), urinary/fecal incontinence, constipation syndrome, malnutrition, dehydration, chronic pain syndrome.
Comprehensive geriatric assessment – a multidimensional interdisciplinary diagnostic process that includes assessment of physical and psycho-emotional status, functional capabilities, and identification of social problems in an older person, aimed at developing a treatment and monitoring plan to restore or maintain the patient's level of functional activity.
Elderly age – 60–74 years according to the 2012 World Health Organization age group classification.
Polypharmacy – the simultaneous prescription of 5 or more drug names to a patient, or more than 10 names during a course of treatment.
Polymorbidity (multimorbidity) – the presence of two or more chronic diseases in a single patient, regardless of the activity of each.
Sarcopenia – a progressive, age-associated, generalized, potentially reversible skeletal muscle disease associated with a high risk of adverse outcomes, including falls, fractures, disability, and death.
Confirmed sarcopenia – a diagnosis of sarcopenia is established based on low muscle strength and muscle mass values.
Severe sarcopenia – a diagnosis of sarcopenia is established, and additional assessment of physical performance using functional tests is required.
Frailty – a geriatric syndrome characterized by an age-associated decrease in physiological reserve and the functions of many body systems, leading to increased vulnerability of the older person to endo- and exogenous factors and a high risk of adverse health outcomes, loss of autonomy, and death. The frailty syndrome is closely related to other geriatric syndromes and polymorbidity, is potentially reversible, and influences patient management tactics. There are two models describing frailty, the phenotypic model, which includes five criteria (unintentional weight loss, low grip strength, increased fatigue, reduced walking speed, and low physical activity), and the deficit accumulation model, which involves assessing 40 to 70 deficits and calculating the frailty index.
Senile age – 75–89 years according to the 2012 World Health Organization age group classification.
Physical activity – any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that requires energy expenditure.
Physical performance – defined as objectively measured whole-body function related to locomotion.
Skeletal muscle function – determined by muscle strength and physical performance.
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Sarcopenia is a progressive, age-associated, generalized, potentially reversible skeletal muscle disease associated with a high risk of adverse outcomes, including falls, fractures, disability, and death [1]. The development of sarcopenia is associated with a large number of factors, including aging, malnutrition, low physical activity, and the presence of chronic diseases [2]. Sarcopenia is also an important prognostic indicator of the likelihood of complications from existing diseases and patient survival [3].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
Sarcopenia is a multi-etiological disease whose development is driven by multiple factors. These factors include both internal (genetic, hormonal, metabolic) and external (lifestyle, diet, physical activity) aspects. Factors closely associated with the risk of developing sarcopenia include:
Advanced age;
Underweight and obesity;
Residence in long-term care facilities;
Malnutrition;
Bad habits (alcohol dependence, smoking);
Low physical activity;
Vitamin D deficiency (less than 20 ng/L);
Multiple organ failure;
Progression of chronic diseases: diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular diseases, acute cerebrovascular accident, liver cirrhosis, immunoinflammatory rheumatic diseases, malabsorption, inflammatory bowel diseases, malignant neoplasms;
Prolonged uncontrolled intake of medicinal products belonging to the following groups: statins, glucocorticoids, loop diuretics.
Patient sex (specifically female sex) cannot currently be considered a factor closely associated with the risk of developing sarcopenia due to conflicting data in modern studies and publications [4, 5].
The pathogenetic mechanisms of sarcopenia development are quite diverse and complex. They are primarily driven by the aging process of the body as a whole and striated muscle tissue in particular. Maintaining muscle homeostasis depends on endogenous (endocrine, inflammatory, metabolic) and exogenous (physical exercise, nutrition) factors. Hormonal factors play an important role in the development and maintenance of muscle function throughout life, particularly testosterone, estrogens, growth hormone (GH), insulin, and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), the synthesis of which decreases with age [6, 7].
Skeletal muscle aging is characterized by the loss of alpha-motor neurons and a decrease in the number of type I and type II muscle fibers, with the development of myofibrillar atrophy. Remodeling of skeletal muscle tissue via neuropathic, neurohormonal, and inflammatory pathways leads to a decrease in muscle cross-sectional area, volume, and regeneration rate. Degradation of the neuromuscular junction is characterized by impaired Schwann cell function, which contributes to ineffective reinnervation of muscle fibers with the gradual replacement of muscle mass by adipose and connective tissue [8, 9].
The progression of sarcopenia is also promoted by inadequate protein intake, which leads to a decrease in muscle protein synthesis. The quality of consumed protein is important. High-quality proteins containing 10 essential amino acids are potent stimulators of the mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathway, which regulates protein synthesis. With age, achieving a maximum anabolic response requires consuming a larger amount of protein than at a younger age. In addition, protein metabolism is affected by impaired absorption and increased protein breakdown, in which myostatin, a member of the TGFβ family, plays an active role [10-13].
Vitamin D and its active form, calcitriol, play a leading role in the regulation of metabolic processes in muscle tissue, exerting their effects through genomic and non-genomic mechanisms. Vitamin D has a direct effect on muscle cells by activating specific vitamin D receptors (VDR) present in skeletal muscles. These receptors are activated by calcitriol and regulate the expression of genes associated with muscle growth and function. Additionally, vitamin D suppresses the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α and IL-6), exhibiting anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-apoptotic effects [14-17]. During aging, cells acquire a secretory phenotype that enhances the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, TNF-α, C-reactive protein (CRP), etc., leading to the development of low-grade chronic inflammation, which activates catabolic processes in muscle tissue [18].
Adipokines, hormones synthesized by both adipose and muscle tissue, play an important role in muscle tissue metabolism. On the one hand, muscles produce pro-inflammatory adipokines, such as leptin, resistin, and others, which disrupt myoblast differentiation and stimulate the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β); on the other hand, anti-inflammatory adipokines—adiponectin and irisin—are synthesized, improving muscle protein metabolism and promoting the synthesis of anti-inflammatory cytokines [19-21].
The negative role of oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of sarcopenia is well known. With age, there is a decrease in mitochondrial function, as well as a decline in antioxidant systems, resulting in increased production of superoxide anions capable of damaging muscle cell DNA, oxidizing proteins and lipids, disrupting cellular signaling mechanisms, and ultimately activating apoptotic pathways. Furthermore, oxidative stress is interrelated with other pathogenetic factors of sarcopenia. For example, chronic inflammation frequently observed in older adults (so-called "inflammaging") enhances the production of reactive oxygen species through the activation of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α [22-24]. In turn, impaired mitochondrial function contributes to the loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength in two ways: by increasing the accumulation of damaged proteins and by reducing the capacity of mitochondria to generate energy [25].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
According to research data, the prevalence of sarcopenia varies across different countries worldwide: from 4.3% in the USA to 58% in Spain, and from 21.8% to 46.5% in European countries [26].
Studies conducted in the Russian Federation have shown that the prevalence of sarcopenia in the general older adult population ranged from 30 to 37% [27, 28].
The prevalence of sarcopenia directly depends on which international working group guidelines were used for diagnosis in the studies, varying from 9.9 to 40.4% [29].
The prevalence of sarcopenia depends on ethnicity, being lower in the USA, China, and Japan (4.3%, 9.0%, and 9.4%, respectively) compared to residents of Mexico and Spain (33.6% and 58%, respectively) [26].
Among community-dwelling older adults, the prevalence of sarcopenia ranges from 1% to 29%, whereas in institutionalized long-term care residents, it ranges from 14% to 33% [30].
The proportion of individuals suffering from sarcopenia increases with age, reaching 57.2% at 90 years and older [31].
It is worth noting that the prevalence of sarcopenia is higher in individuals suffering from circulatory system diseases (acute and chronic heart failure, strokes, arterial hypertension), type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, anemia, oncological diseases, autoimmune and rheumatic diseases, osteoporosis, and osteoarthritis [32-38, 267].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
M62.8 – Other specified disorders of muscle
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
Several classifications of sarcopenia are used in clinical practice.
I. By form:
Primary sarcopenia, age-associated;
Secondary sarcopenia:
– sarcopenia associated with reduced physical activity (sedentary lifestyle, prolonged immobilization, microgravity/absence of gravity);
– sarcopenia associated with chronic non-communicable diseases (diseases of the cardiovascular system, lungs, liver, kidneys, brain, inflammatory diseases, endocrine disorders, malignant neoplasms);
– sarcopenia associated with inadequate nutrition (insufficient dietary protein intake due to malabsorption, malnutrition, gastrointestinal disorders, or the use of medications provoking anorexia).
II. By the ratio between adipose tissue and muscle mass:
Type 1 – associated with a high body fat content (more than 38% in women and more than 27% in men) with a reduction in skeletal muscle mass;
Type 2 – characterized by a reduction in skeletal muscle mass with normal or reduced body fat content.
III. By disease duration:
– acute sarcopenia (duration up to 6 months);
– chronic sarcopenia (duration over 6 months) [1].
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
Patients may present with a number of non-specific signs and symptoms indicating the possible presence of sarcopenia or an increased risk of its development. The most significant signs of sarcopenia are difficulties in performing certain activities that require muscle strength and endurance [1]. These activities include:
1. Lifting and carrying loads:
Patients may experience difficulty lifting and holding objects weighing 4-5 kg or more. This may manifest as weakness in the arms, tremor, or rapid fatigability [39, 40].
2. Indoor walking:
Noticeable slowing of walking speed, instability, the need for an assistive device (e.g., a cane or walker), or frequent stops to rest [39, 40].
3. Rising from a bed or chair:
Difficulty getting up from a bed or chair, the need to push off with the hands or use additional aids (e.g., armrests) [39, 40].
4. Stair climbing:
Difficulty climbing a single flight of stairs, including the need to rest halfway, shortness of breath, or pronounced fatigue [39, 40].
5. History of falls:
Presence or increased frequency of fall episodes associated with loss of balance, leg weakness, or decreased motor coordination [39, 40].
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
The diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia are:
reduced muscle strength;
reduced muscle mass.
A diagnosis of sarcopenia is confirmed based on low values of muscle strength and muscle mass. To determine the severity of sarcopenia, physical performance is assessed. Meanwhile, low muscle strength is a powerful predictor of functional limitations, poor quality of life, and mortality.
In 2018, the second European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) updated the diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia, defining probable, confirmed, and severe sarcopenia. Muscle strength became the primary diagnostic component for detecting sarcopenia, as it best reflects skeletal muscle function, while muscle mass confirms the presence of sarcopenia. Furthermore, reduced physical performance indicates severe sarcopenia [1].
To date, there is no single algorithm for diagnosing sarcopenia. When muscle mass cannot be determined in practical work, the term probable sarcopenia can be used based on characteristic complaints and identified reduced muscle strength. From the perspective of the specialized EWGSOP2 expert group, identifying probable sarcopenia is sufficient to initiate therapeutic interventions for sarcopenia.
Based on these facts, in real clinical practice, sarcopenia should be diagnosed when a patient presents with complaints characteristic of sarcopenia and exhibits reduced muscle strength.
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
Patients with sarcopenia may not voice complaints, considering their symptoms to be a natural manifestation of aging.
For a more structured collection of complaints, one should purposefully inquire about the presence of the following symptoms: increased fatigue, muscle weakness, difficulty performing certain activities (e.g., walking on flat ground, rising from a chair, climbing stairs), and the number of falls over the past year [41, 42, 43, 268]. These complaints are not specific to sarcopenia, but they fall into the category of "characteristic" signs of sarcopenia.
It is recommended to assess the presence of complaints (therapeutic history and symptom review) characteristic of sarcopenia during every examination of a patient aged 60 years and older for the purpose of sarcopenia screening [1, 9, 11].
GCR CLEL 5Level of recommendation evidence C (level of data reliability 5).
Comments: sarcopenia is one of the most unfavorable geriatric syndromes regarding patient prognosis. The presence of sarcopenia is associated with a more severe course of chronic non-communicable diseases, a high risk of falls and fractures, and a high rate of disability. Identifying sarcopenia is crucial for determining the prognosis, management tactics, duration, and quality of life of the patient [44].
It is recommended to assess the presence of unintentional weight loss of 5% or more over the past 6 months during every examination of patients aged 60 years and older for the purpose of sarcopenia screening (B01.007.001/002 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a geriatrician; B01.026.001/002 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a general practitioner (family physician); B01.047.001/002 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a general physician [45, 46].
GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4).
Comments: the criterion for unintentional weight loss is a body weight decrease > 5% within the preceding 6 months or > 10% over a period of more than 6 months. Weight loss is closely associated with the presence of malnutrition and frailty syndrome in patients aged 60 years and older, the course of which is often accompanied by the development of sarcopenia. In elderly and senile patients, any weight loss is associated with the development and/or progression of sarcopenia, malnutrition, bone mass loss, and increased mortality [46].
2.2 Physical Examination
It is recommended to measure weight and height, calculate body mass index, and assess calf and arm circumference in all patients aged 60 years and older during each visit (A02.07.004 Anthropometric studies; B01.026.001/002 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a general practitioner (family physician); B01.047.001/002 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a general physician) in order to detect the risk of developing sarcopenia and assess its prognosis [47-49].
GCR BLOCE 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 2).
Comments: body mass index (BMI) is an indicator that allows assessing the degree of correspondence between a person's weight and height. BMI = body mass/height2 (kg/m2). Reference BMI values:
• < 18.5 kg/m² — underweight;
• 18.5–24.9 kg/m² — normal body weight;
• 25–29.9 kg/m² — overweight;
• ≥ 30 kg/m² — obesity.
The development of sarcopenia is most likely at low BMI values. However, the presence of normal weight, overweight, or obesity in a patient does not exclude the risks of developing sarcopenia.
A decrease in calf volume (circumference less than 31 cm for both sexes) is a sign of reduced muscle mass [269].
It is recommended to perform screening and diagnosis of sarcopenia (A02.02.003 Measurement of hand grip strength; A02.02.005 Determination of dynamic strength of a single muscle) in all patients with chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, oncological diseases, autoimmune and rheumatic diseases, etc., in order to assess the risk of developing and progressing sarcopenia, predict the severity of the underlying disease, and develop an individual management and rehabilitation plan [50-54, 270].
Grate ALEL 2Level of recommendation persuasiveness A (level of evidentiary reliability 2).
Comments: as part of sarcopenia screening, handgrip dynamometry parameters and/or the results of the 5-times sit-to-stand test are evaluated (Appendix B).
Chronic non-communicable diseases (CNCDs) are accompanied by systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, hormonal changes, inadequate nutrition, and low physical activity, which in turn accelerates the process of muscle tissue and function loss. The presence of sarcopenia worsens the prognosis of such patients, is associated with a more severe course of the disease, decreased exercise tolerance, an increased risk of CNCD decompensation, and increases the rate of disability.
It is recommended to screen and diagnose frailty syndrome (FS) (B03.007.001 Comprehensive geriatric assessment of functional and cognitive status; B01.007.001 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a geriatrician) in all patients aged 60 years and older with detected sarcopenia using the "Age is No Obstacle" questionnaire (Appendix G1) to determine indications for a geriatrician consultation and individualize the patient management plan [55-59].
Grate BLEL 2Level of recommendation persuasiveness B (level of evidentiary reliability 2).
Comments: identification of FS determines the health and life prognosis for an elderly patient, their management tactics, and the need for outside assistance and care. FS screening at the primary healthcare level has proven effective in preventing the decline in functional status of elderly and senile patients [58, 59]. The use of short validated (in a specific country) questionnaires aimed at identifying the main signs of FS and key GS is an international practice for identifying FS that has proven its effectiveness. FS screening is carried out using the "Age is No Obstacle" scale (Appendix G1), based on the results of which the patient is referred to a geriatrician.
It is recommended to assess the risk of falls in all patients aged 60 years and older in order to develop a patient-centered management plan for a patient with sarcopenia (B03.007.001 Comprehensive geriatric assessment of functional and cognitive status) [60-64].
Grate ALEL 2Level of recommendation persuasiveness A (level of evidentiary reliability 2).
Comments: when assessing risk factors for falls, one should be guided by the clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health "Falls in elderly and senile patients".
It is recommended to assess the 10-year probability of low-energy fractures (B01.058.001/002 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by an endocrinologist; B01.007.001/002 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a geriatrician) using the FRAX tool in all patients aged 60 years and older with sarcopenia in order to develop a patient-centered management plan and reduce the risk of adverse outcomes [60, 63, 64].
LEL 2Level of recommendation persuasiveness A (level of evidentiary reliability 2).
Comment: examination, management, and follow-up of patients with osteoporosis are carried out based on the clinical guidelines "Osteoporosis".
It is recommended to assess nutritional status (B01.007.001/002 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a geriatrician;) using the Mini Nutritional Assessment short form (Appendix G3) in all patients aged 60 years and older to detect malnutrition syndrome as a risk factor for the development of sarcopenia, and to develop an individual plan for its prevention and treatment [65-71].
LEL 2Level of recommendation persuasiveness A (level of evidentiary reliability 2).
Comments: since the main intervention strategy for sarcopenia is increasing dietary protein intake, active detection of malnutrition plays a crucial role in patient management tactics. When malnutrition or the risk of its development is detected, the examination and management of the patient are carried out taking into account the clinical guidelines "Malnutrition in elderly and senile patients", posted in the electronic rubricator of clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health.
It is recommended to determine the presence of pain syndrome and assess its intensity using the VAS (Appendix G4) in all patients older than 60 years with sarcopenia (B01.007.001/002 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a geriatrician; B01.026.001/002 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a general practitioner (family physician); B01.047.001/002 Initial/follow-up examination (inspection, consultation) by a general physician) in order to develop patient-centered treatment and rehabilitation programs [72-75].
Grate ALEL 2Level of recommendation persuasiveness A (level of evidentiary reliability 2).
Comments: chronic musculoskeletal pain in patients aged 60 years and older is considered in relation to the development and progression of sarcopenia. On the one hand, pain itself can reduce patient activity, exacerbating sarcopenia; on the other hand, pathogenetic changes in muscles during sarcopenia (primarily the inflammatory cascade) can worsen degenerative changes in cartilage and bone tissue [74, 75].
It is recommended to assess social status in older adults and elderly individuals with diagnosed sarcopenia to determine their need for social services and long-term care, and to refer this information to social services (B01.007.001/002 Initial/follow-up appointment (examination, consultation) by a geriatrician), in order to plan long-term care and support for patients with sarcopenia and reduced/lost autonomy through close collaboration between medical and social services [66, 76-78].
Grate ALEL 2Level of recommendation persuasiveness A (level of evidentiary reliability 2).
Comments: The patient's social status is partially assessed by all members of the multidisciplinary team, but the most comprehensive assessment is performed by a medical social worker. When assessing social status, data on educational level, occupation, marital status, living arrangements, whom the patient turns to for help when needed are clarified, home safety is evaluated, and signs of neglect, self-neglect, and elder abuse are identified.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
It is recommended to measure hemoglobin levels (A09.05.003 Blood total hemoglobin test) in all older and elderly patients with sarcopenia to differentially diagnose primary and secondary sarcopenia [66, 79, 80].
GRL CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4).
Comments: Anemia is a common condition in older adults and elderly individuals, associated with an increased risk of developing sarcopenia. The WHO diagnostic criterion for anemia is a hemoglobin (Hb) level of less than 130 g/L in men and less than 120 g/L in non-pregnant women. Even mild anemia increases mortality risk, elevates morbidity, and reduces patients' quality of life.
It is recommended to measure serum ferritin levels (A09.05.076 Blood ferritin test) in all older and elderly patients with sarcopenia to diagnose latent iron deficiency as a factor that exacerbates the severity of sarcopenia [320, 323].
GRL CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4).
Comments: Iron is one of the key trace elements maintaining normal muscle tissue function. Iron is a component of myoglobin and is also required as a cofactor for electron transfer by all complexes of the mitochondrial electron transport chain, ensuring energy metabolism in myocytes. Muscle tissue contains up to 15% of all body iron and is one of the most energy-demanding tissues in the body. Iron deficiency and anemia lead to reduced muscle aerobic capacity, muscle strength, muscle mass, and muscle function [319-324].
It is recommended to measure total protein and albumin levels in the blood of individuals aged 60 years and older as serological markers of sarcopenia to detect the presence of sarcopenia, as well as malnutrition syndrome as a risk and progression factor for sarcopenia [81, 82, 83].
COR BLOE 3Class of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3).
Comments: A decrease in serum total protein and albumin concentrations in patients with frailty syndrome is a sign of protein-energy malnutrition and undernutrition. Low total protein and albumin levels serve as serological markers of sarcopenia.
It is recommended to perform a comprehensive metabolic panel including glucose, AST, ALT, bilirubin, iron, and vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) levels (B03.016.004 General medical blood biochemistry panel; A09.05.023 Blood glucose test; A09.05.041 Blood aspartate aminotransferase activity assay; A09.05.042 Blood alanine aminotransferase activity assay; A09.05.021 Blood total bilirubin test; A09.05.007 Serum iron test; A12.06.060 Blood vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) test) in all patients with sarcopenia to differentially diagnose primary and secondary sarcopenia [84-88].
COR BLOE 3Class of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3).
Comments: If these values deviate from the reference ranges, a diagnostic workup must be conducted to identify conditions that may cause secondary sarcopenia.
It is recommended to measure serum C-reactive protein levels (A09.05.009 Serum C-reactive protein test) in patients during the diagnosis of sarcopenia to differentiate between primary and secondary sarcopenia, assess the intensity of systemic inflammation as a pathogenetic factor of sarcopenia, and develop an individualized patient management plan [83, 89-93].
Grate ALEL 2Level of recommendation persuasiveness A (level of evidentiary reliability 2).
Comments: Blood CRP levels are a strong independent prognostic marker of sarcopenia, impaired mobility, and reduced activities of daily living.
It is recommended to measure serum 25-OH vitamin D levels in patients older than 60 years as a serological marker of sarcopenia to detect the presence of vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency [83, 94-104].
Grate ALEL 2Level of recommendation persuasiveness A (level of evidentiary reliability 2).
Comments: Blood 25-OH vitamin D levels are a strong independent diagnostic and prognostic marker of sarcopenia [83, 94-104]. Vitamin D deficiency corresponds to a 25(OH)D3 concentration < 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L), vitamin D insufficiency to 25(OH)D3 from 20 to 30 ng/mL (50 to 75 nmol/L), and sufficiency to > 30 ng/mL (75 nmol/L). The recommended target level of 25(OH)D3 when correcting vitamin D deficiency is 30–60 ng/mL (75–150 nmol/L) [105].
It is recommended to measure total and/or ionized calcium and parathyroid hormone levels in the blood of patients with sarcopenia receiving therapy with active vitamin D metabolites (alfacalcidol**, calcitriol**) and their analogues (Vitamin D and analogues A11CC) to monitor the efficacy and safety of prescribed doses [325].
GCR CLEL 5Level of recommendation evidence C (level of data reliability 5).
Comments: Due to the potential risk of developing hypercalcemia/hypercalciuria, these medications may only be prescribed under medical monitoring of blood calcium levels and, in some cases, urinary calcium levels (provided glomerular filtration rate is normal).
It is recommended to measure thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4) (A09.05.063 Serum free thyroxine (FT4) test), and free triiodothyronine (FT3) levels in the blood of patients with sarcopenia to differentiate between primary and secondary sarcopenia [106, 107, 108].
GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4).
Comments: Levels of TSH, free thyroxine (FT4), and free triiodothyronine (FT3) are associated with indices of muscle mass and function. Both hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism can contribute to the development of sarcopenia by altering muscle protein synthesis and breakdown, as well as increasing oxidative stress.
It is recommended to measure serum creatinine and cystatin C levels with eGFR calculation using the CKD-EPI equation in all patients to assess renal function and guide drug dosing regimens [109, 110, 111]. (A09.05.020 Blood creatinine test — calculation should preferably be performed using the CKD-EPI equation, available at https://www.kidney.org/professionals/gfr_calculator).
GRL CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4).
Comments: In addition to calculating eGFR using the CKD-EPI equation, it is advisable to calculate creatinine clearance using the Cockcroft-Gault formula, as the prescribing information for many drugs uses this parameter for dose adjustment. Calculating eGFR using cystatin C concentration via the CKD-EPI Cystatin C equation is appropriate in clinical settings where the accuracy of creatinine-based eGFR is compromised [109, 110, 111].
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
It is recommended to perform hand muscle strength tests (A02.02.003 Hand muscle strength measurement) in all patients aged 60 years and older to identify low muscle strength for the detection of sarcopenia [112].
GCR BLOCE 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 2).
Comments: Handgrip dynamometry should be performed in all older and elderly patients to assess hand muscle strength for the diagnosis of sarcopenia. The procedure [271] is described in Appendix G5. Dynamometry is performed using an electronic or hydraulic/mechanical dynamometer. To obtain more accurate results, it is recommended to take three measurements of muscle strength on both the right and left hand. The rest interval between trials is approximately 1 minute. The maximum muscle strength value of the stronger hand can be used to evaluate the results. Dynamometry cut-off values indicating reduced muscle strength to diagnose sarcopenia are < 16 kg in women and < 27 kg in men.
It is recommended to assess muscle strength and physical performance using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (Appendix G6) in all patients aged 60 years and older to diagnose sarcopenia, assess disease severity, and predict adverse outcomes (falls, fractures, dependency, disability, death) [1, 64, 113-118].
GRL BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3).
Comments: The Short Physical Performance Battery (Appendix G6) is performed in accordance with the clinical guidelines on "Frailty" published in the electronic rubricator of clinical guidelines of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Lower extremity muscle strength is assessed using the 5-time sit-to-stand test [115].
The 4-meter gait speed test is used to determine the severity of sarcopenia and predict adverse events. A gait speed < 0.8 m/s is an unfavorable prognostic indicator. Conversely, a gait speed ≥ 1 m/s is considered the target gait speed [116, 117].
Balance is assessed using the following tests: feet together, semi-tandem, and tandem stance. Decreased muscle strength and function impair balance maintenance, increasing the risk of falls and adverse outcomes [64, 118].
It is recommended to assess muscle mass using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) (A06.03.061 X-ray densitometry) with Whole-Body software, calculating absolute muscle mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index, in older and geriatric patients with complaints suggestive of sarcopenia and preserved muscle strength, in combination with a high risk of falls, osteoporotic fractures, or a history of falls, diabetes mellitus, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, oncological diseases, thyroid dysfunction, anemia, rheumatic and other chronic inflammatory diseases, or malnutrition, in order to assess muscle mass, confirm the diagnosis of sarcopenia, and evaluate patient prognosis [1, 119-122].
COR BLOE 3Class of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3).
It is recommended to measure muscle mass via CT/MRI with measurement of the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle at the L3 level (A05.02.002 Magnetic resonance imaging of the muscular system; A06.03.058 Computed tomography of the spine (one section)) [1, 121], as well as to assess muscle mass using bioelectrical impedance analysis (A05.30.014 Determination of water, muscle, and adipose tissue percentage using a bioimpedance analyzer) with calculation of absolute muscle mass and appendicular skeletal muscle mass index in certain older and geriatric patients presenting with complaints characteristic of sarcopenia and preserved muscle strength, for the purpose of muscle mass assessment, diagnosis confirmation, and prognosis evaluation [123-126].
GCR BLOCE 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 2).
Comments: bioelectrical impedance analysis is based on measuring the electrical resistance of body tissues. It allows for the evaluation of key body composition parameters, such as muscle mass, adipose tissue, and total body water content. The appendicular skeletal muscle mass index (ASMI) is calculated as the ratio of limb muscle mass to height squared (kg/m²). This parameter is used to standardize data and compare it with normative values.
2.5 Other Procedures
It is recommended to consult an orthopedic trauma surgeon (B01.050.001 Initial consultation/examination by an orthopedic trauma surgeon) for patients over 60 years of age with sarcopenia, impaired mobility, gait, and balance disturbances, with the aim of improving mobility and physical activity through the selection of orthopedic devices, minor assistive technologies (canes, walkers, etc.), footwear, and orthopedic insoles [127, 128, 129].
GRL BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3).
Comments: achieving mobility is often impossible without the use of orthopedic devices and minor assistive technologies. In patients with toe deformities, wearing traditional footwear without orthopedic appliances causes pain, which limits mobility (patients stop leaving the house), potentially leading to sarcopenia. Special devices and footwear that facilitate their use should be recommended, and the strategy for expanding mobility should be coordinated with an orthopedic surgeon. Patients with a fear of falling ( and/or a history of falls) severely restrict their mobility; appropriate walking aids (canes, walkers, specialized footwear) should be selected for them to reduce the risk of falls.
It is recommended to consult a geriatrician (B01.007.001 Initial consultation/examination by a geriatrician) if a patient scores 5 or more points on the "Age Is No Obstacle" questionnaire (Appendix G1) and/or 7 or less points on the SPPB (Appendix G6) among patients older than 60 years with sarcopenia and other geriatric syndromes (frailty, impaired mobility, falls or high fall risk, gait and balance disorders, osteoporosis) in order to improve mobility and physical activity [56, 57].
GRL BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3).
Comments: identification of frailty syndrome in sarcopenia determines the prognosis for the health and life of an elderly patient, their management tactics, and the need for assistance and care. Screening for frailty in patients with diagnosed sarcopenia at the primary care level has proven effective in preventing the decline of functional status in older and geriatric patients. When patients aged 60 and older seek medical care, signs indicating the potential presence of frailty syndrome or an increased risk of its development should be actively identified, especially in individuals with sarcopenia. The use of short, country-validated questionnaires aimed at identifying the main signs of frailty and key geriatric syndromes is a screening practice that has proven effective in many countries. In Russia, the "Age Is No Obstacle" questionnaire has been developed and validated (Appendix G1). A score of 5 or more on the "Age Is No Obstacle" questionnaire requires referring the patient to a geriatric office.
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
3.1 Conservative
3.1.1 Non-pharmacological therapy
It is recommended to simultaneously combine a set of physical exercises and dietary protein intake correction (A25.30.019 Prescription of an exercise program (therapeutic physical training); A23.30.009 Development of a therapeutic physical training program; A25.30.002 Prescription of therapeutic diet for unspecified diseases) in patients aged 60 years and older with sarcopenia to increase muscle mass, strength, and improve physical performance [130-134].
GRL ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence 1).
Comments: combining physical exercise and nutrition is an effective intervention for improving muscle health in sarcopenia, among older adults at risk for sarcopenia or at risk of/with malnutrition. Combining increased protein intake and any type of physical exercise increases both muscle mass and muscle strength. Furthermore, the combination of increased protein intake and any physical exercise has a stronger effect in preventing the loss of muscle mass and lower extremity strength in older adults at risk of sarcopenia and frailty compared to physical exercise alone.
It is recommended to inform patients aged 60 years and older with sarcopenia and their caregivers about the importance of simultaneously combining strength training exercises and dietary protein correction (B01.007.001/002 Initial/follow-up consultation by a geriatrician) to improve patient and family adherence to the prescribed treatment [130-134].
GRL BLEL 1Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 1).
Comments: patients with sarcopenia and their caregivers need to be educated on the necessity of correcting the protein component in their diet and performing strength exercises for the treatment of sarcopenia. Increasing patients' awareness of the causes and methods of correcting sarcopenia can dispel any misconceptions about sarcopenia as an inevitable consequence of aging and improve adherence to prescribed interventions.
It is recommended to prescribe a set of physical exercises (A25.30.019 Prescription of an exercise program (therapeutic physical training); A23.30.009 Development of a therapeutic physical training program) to all patients with sarcopenia aged 60 years and older to increase muscle mass, strength, and improve physical performance [135-142].
GRL ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence 1).
Comment: for older adults aged 65 years and older, physical activity yields greater health benefits in accordance with the 2020 WHO Guidelines. It is recommended that individuals aged 65 years and older incorporate aerobic physical activity: at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic physical activity, or an equivalent combination of both throughout the week, along with muscle-strengthening activities involving major muscle groups on two or more days per week. Resistance training plays a leading role in increasing skeletal muscle mass and improving their function (increasing muscle strength and physical performance). Research results demonstrate that anaerobic physical (resistance) exercises performed for ≥ 3 months have a positive effect on muscle mass, strength, and walking speed in older adults. A 3-month course of anaerobic training in older men results in a 6–9% increase in the cross-sectional area of the quadriceps femoris muscle. In addition, performing an adequate amount of resistance exercises is associated with a greater increase in lean muscle mass, the main component of which is muscle tissue. It has been established that with an additional repetition—10 repetitions of an anaerobic exercise performed in one set—it is possible to achieve an increase in lean muscle mass by 0.5 kg.
A reduction in the plasma levels of subclinical chronic inflammation factors in elderly patients has been demonstrated following a course of resistance training. At the same time, resistance training should progressively increase in exercise intensity and include a sufficient number of repetitions to induce a training effect.
Sample anaerobic exercise regimen: at least 2 times per week, including exercises aimed at increasing lower limb muscle strength through squats or leg presses, knee flexion, calf raises, wall push-ups, arm curls with dumbbells and/or resistance bands; exercise intensity should progressively increase from 40–60% to 70–85% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM), consisting of 6–12 repetitions of each exercise in 1–3 sets, with rest intervals between sets ranging from 6 to 120 seconds; the preferred interval (rest) between workouts should be at least 48 hours. Meanwhile, in some patients with sarcopenia who present with lower muscle strength, training may begin at a lower intensity (e.g., 30–60% of 1RM) compared to those with higher baseline strength.
Training programs must be designed by qualified specialists (physicians in physical therapy and sports medicine / exercise therapy specialists). The training program must be regularly reviewed and adjusted depending on the patient's progress and changes in their clinical status.
It is recommended to provide nutritional counseling (referring to a dietician when necessary) (B01.013.001 Initial consultation/examination by a dietician) for all patients with sarcopenia in order to correct protein intake and select an optimal hydration regimen [12, 143-151].
GRL BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3).
Comment: elderly and senile patients with sarcopenia who do not have acute diseases or exacerbations of chronic conditions require an increased daily protein intake of up to 1.5 g/kg of body weight per day. This is due to the development of "anabolic resistance" resulting from slower digestion and assimilation of protein after a meal, which is an important factor in reducing muscle protein synthesis. Protein intake can be increased either by dietary modification or by using dietary supplements with a specific set of nutrients. Furthermore, consuming whole foods, as opposed to isolated amino acids, confers greater benefits. The foods richest in protein include fish, legumes, meat, and eggs.
It is advisable to consume protein up to 1.5–2.0 g/kg/day for patients suffering from acute or chronic diseases, and to increase protein intake up to 2.0 g/kg per day for patients with severe illness and malnutrition. It is desirable to increase protein intake to 1.0–1.5 g/kg of body weight per day for patients with frailty syndrome for the treatment and prevention of sarcopenia, provided that the eGFR is not less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m². Some studies suggest a threshold value of 25–30 g of protein per meal, whereas others propose 0.4 g/kg of protein per meal. At the same time, it is preferable for older adults to distribute protein intake evenly into 25–30 g portions three times a day to optimize the rate of muscle protein synthesis.
The International Working Group on Sarcopenia has emphasized the need for a comprehensive approach to the nutrition of older adults—that is, not relying solely on adequate protein intake, but also including healthy fats/omega-3 fatty acids and sufficient fluid intake in the diet, as well as evaluating the quality of consumed calories and taking into account the impact of medications on nutrient utilization.
It is recommended to prescribe high-protein oral nutritional supplements (sip feeds) [272-274] for patients with sarcopenia who fail to achieve the required protein intake through diet alone, with the aim of increasing muscle strength, daily activity, physical performance, and physical functioning (Appendix A3).
GRL ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence 1).
Comment: protein supplements have shown benefits in improving muscle strength; however, when combined with physical exercise, they demonstrated a significant improvement in muscle mass, strength, and physical functioning in elderly patients with sarcopenia.
It is recommended to consult a medical-social care nurse (A13.29.011 Social and rehabilitation work) for patients over 60 years of age with sarcopenia or marked reduction in mobility (or loss of autonomy) in order to identify potentially remediable social problems [152, 153, 310].
GRL BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3).
Comments: loneliness and social isolation are major factors contributing to ineffective treatment and progression of sarcopenia. Patients should be encouraged to contact social service centers for leisure organization and enhancement of social activity.
It is recommended to discuss the individualized treatment plan for patients with sarcopenia with physicians of other specialties, depending on the patient's comorbidity, in order to increase the efficacy of therapeutic measures [154, 155, 310].
GRL BLEL 3Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 3).
Comments: coordinated actions of a multidisciplinary team contribute to personalized muscle health management, the implementation of protein-enriched nutrition, and rehabilitation nutrition; furthermore, the frequency of sarcopenia assessment increases. Lifestyle, biological, and psychosocial factors affecting muscle health must also be identified and monitored by various healthcare professionals.
It is recommended to conduct counseling on organizing household and environmental safety, and preventing falls and fractures in patients over 60 years of age with sarcopenia in order to prevent geriatric syndromes and their consequences [156-159, 310-312].
GCR CLEL 5Level of recommendation evidence C (level of data reliability 5).
Comments: core activities aimed at reducing the risk of falls should include: consultations with specialists (geriatrician, ophthalmologist, otolaryngologist, urologist, gynecologist) to correct sensory deficits, geriatric syndromes, and urinary tract disorders; adjusting furniture to a comfortable height (beds, armchairs, toilets, etc.); ensuring furniture stability; installing handrails, especially in restrooms and bathrooms; using non-slip floor coverings; choosing non-traumatic floor coverings (e.g., fitted carpet); eliminating thresholds wherever possible; adequate, but not overly bright lighting; and high-contrast markings on stairs and steps.
3.1.2 Pharmacotherapy
Currently, there is no convincing evidence regarding the role of pharmacological agents in slowing the progression of sarcopenia. However, considering the well-established pathogenetically driven role of insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, obesity, inflammatory diseases, hypogonadism, iron deficiency, vitamin B12 deficiency, vitamin D3 deficiency, and a number of other age-associated conditions, an individualized patient management plan must be developed, taking into account the correction of these conditions and the achievement of target control parameters. Only vitamin D supplements and their analogs have demonstrated the most compelling evidence regarding efficacy and safety in patients with sarcopenia.
When choosing the pharmacotherapy strategy for sarcopenia, clinicians take into account not only the presence of chronic and/or acute diseases, but also geriatric syndromes—especially frailty—the results of functional status assessments, and the presence of psychoemotional disorders and social problems in elderly and senile patients.
It is recommended to prescribe native forms of vitamin D3 (vitamin D and analogues A11CC, cholecalciferol**) to patients with sarcopenia and vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency to correct its levels, improve skeletal muscle function, and prevent falls and fractures. Treatment of vitamin D deficiency is recommended to begin with a cumulative loading dose of cholecalciferol** of 400,000 IU using a daily or weekly dosing regimen, taking into account patient preferences and expected maximum treatment adherence, followed by a transition to maintenance doses (Appendix A3, Table 1) [100, 157, 160-169].
GRL ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence 1).
Comment: vitamin D deficiency corresponds to a 25(OH)D3 concentration of < 20 ng/mL (< 50 nmol/L), insufficiency to 25(OH)D3 from 20 to 30 ng/mL (from 50 to 75 nmol/L), and an adequate level is 30-100 ng/mL (75-250 nmol/L). In the treatment of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency, preference is given to medicinal products of the native form of D3 (cholecalciferol**), which have comparatively greater efficacy in achieving and maintaining target serum 25(OH)D values [334, 335]. Cholecalciferol** (vitamin D) supplementation at a dose of 800–1000 IU/day is associated with a lower risk of falls among the elderly and has a beneficial effect on fall prevention in populations receiving daily doses, whereas intermittent cholecalciferol** administration has no preventive effect [276]. High doses of cholecalciferol** (> 1000 IU/day) increase the risk of falls compared to a dose of 800-1000 IU/day of cholecalciferol**. Calcium preparations increase the positive effect of cholecalciferol** on fall prevention, whereas calcium monotherapy is less effective than cholecalciferol** monotherapy. Rarer dosing regimens of once a month or once every 3 months increase the risk of falls. Oral administration of native forms of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol**) helps increase muscle strength and physical performance, and reduces the frequency of falls and fractures [276]. High doses of cholecalciferol** lead to high serum 25(OH)D concentrations, and at values above 40-45 ng/mL (100-112.5 nmol/L), the risk of falls in elderly individuals increases. Obesity reduces the efficacy of cholecalciferol** therapy by diminishing the increase in 25(OH)D levels by approximately 15 ng/mL.
Long-term therapy with antiepileptic drugs leads to a decrease in serum cholecalciferol** concentration. These patients require higher doses to maintain adequate blood 25(OH)D levels. Long-term therapy with high doses of glucocorticoids H02AB is accompanied by the development of Cushing's syndrome and requires an increase in the cholecalciferol** dose throughout the high-dose therapy period to maintain adequate blood 25(OH)D levels. To correct vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in patients with sarcopenia in the presence of CKD, standard doses of cholecalciferol** are used in treatment, contributing to an increase in serum 25(OH)D concentration, a reduction in the risk of falls and fractures and all-cause mortality. This therapy is not accompanied by the development of hypercalcemia, but leads to a significant increase in blood phosphorus. Concomitant intake of whey protein and cholecalciferol** may increase appendicular muscle mass in patients with sarcopenia, improve muscle strength, and enhance physical performance [100, 162, 163, 164, 165, 167-189].
It is recommended to prescribe active vitamin D metabolites (vitamin D and analogues A11CC, alfacalcidol**, calcitriol**) to patients with sarcopenia and a high risk of falls when a vitamin D metabolism disorder is established according to absolute and relative indications [167, 277-278].
Grate ALEL 2Level of recommendation persuasiveness A (level of evidentiary reliability 2).
Comments: active vitamin D metabolites have demonstrated greater efficacy compared to cholecalciferol** in reducing the risk of falls, especially in patients with decreased GFR (< 65 mL/min) [279]. Alfacalcidol** has been shown to increase muscle strength in elderly individuals, while co-administration with calcium preparations did not result in an additional effect on muscle strength [278]. The positive effect of alfacalcidol** on muscle strength and skeletal muscle function does not depend on serum 25(OH)D levels [280].
At the same time, when 25(OH)D deficiency is established, compensation of native vitamin D deficiency is an obligatory stage of treatment and is carried out, inter alia, in patients with end-stage renal disease [313] and diabetic nephropathy [314]. It must be remembered that active vitamin D metabolites and their analogues are not detected in significant amounts when examining serum vitamin D concentrations due to their structural differences from cholecalciferol** and their rapid degradation. The prescription of active vitamin D metabolites (alfacalcidol**, calcitriol**) and their analogues is possible in patients with sarcopenia and a high risk of falls only when a vitamin D metabolism disorder is established according to the absolute and relative indications given in Table 2.
Active vitamin D metabolites and their analogues should also be prescribed with caution simultaneously with native vitamin D preparations containing a cholecalciferol** dose higher than the prophylactic dose (more than 800–1000 IU per day) [315].
It is known that in the presence of hypoparathyroidism, average therapeutic doses of calcitriol** are 0.25-2.0 mcg/day, and for alfacalcidol** - 1.0-4.0 mcg/day. To maintain blood calcium levels within the target range in hypoparathyroidism, titration of vitamin D and its derivative doses is necessary, dividing the total drug dose into 2-3 administrations. Dose titration is usually performed in steps of 0.5 (or 0.25) mcg for alfacalcidol** and 0.25 mcg for calcitriol** [316]. A larger dose adjustment step may be required in cases of marked hypo-/hypercalcemia. The preferred time interval for adjusting doses of vitamin D and its derivatives (alfacalcidol**, calcitriol**) in hypoparathyroidism is 2-3 days, due to their pharmacokinetics and, consequently, an adequate assessment of the implemented changes. In cases of asymptomatic presentation and moderate fluctuations in calcaemia parameters, laboratory evaluation of the adequacy of the adjusted doses can be performed after 7-10 days. Evaluating the clinical efficacy of the selected therapy and achieving stable calcaemia values may take about 2-3 months, especially for patients with a high requirement for vitamin D and its derivatives.
It is not recommended to prescribe angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), as well as medications with anabolic effects, to patients with sarcopenia for the purpose of increasing muscle mass, strength, and improving physical functioning [190-211].
GCR BLOCE 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 2).
Comments: in Russia, routine clinical practice holds a persistent belief in the efficacy of medications with anabolic effects, but study results have not demonstrated sustained efficacy of these medications.
No effect on muscle mass and skeletal muscle function was found during the administration of ACE inhibitors and ARBs.
The efficacy of testosterone use in clinical studies for increasing muscle mass or function varies depending on the patients included, duration of use, dose, and methods for assessing components of sarcopenia.
The use of estrogens in clinical studies did not contribute to an increase in muscle mass or an improvement in skeletal muscle function in elderly individuals.
It is recommended to replete iron deficiency and treat iron deficiency anemia with iron preparations in patients over 60 years of age with sarcopenia in order to normalize ferritin and hemoglobin concentrations, increase muscle strength, and improve muscle function in accordance with current clinical guidelines for "Iron deficiency anemia" [318].
LoR CLE 2Level of recommendation C (level of evidence 2).
3.1.3 Other treatment
It is recommended to prescribe a bioactive concentrate of small marine fish (Alflutop) (2.0 mL intramuscularly once every 2 days, 10 injections) to patients with sarcopenia and osteoarthritis with pain syndrome in order to improve physical functioning [328].
LoR CLE 3Level of recommendation C (level of evidence 3).
Comments: a single-center prospective comparative study showed that the use of a bioactive concentrate of small marine fish over 2 months of follow-up resulted in a significantly greater increase in upper extremity muscle strength. Additionally, the intervention group showed a clinically significant reduction in time to complete the "Timed Up and Go" test, and an increased walking speed compared to the control group.
It is recommended that patients with sarcopenia and osteoarthritis be prescribed a dietary supplement containing sodium chondroitin sulfate, glucosamine, hyaluronic acid, and methylsulfonylmethane (736 mg + 832 mg + 600 mg + 30 mg per two tablets, respectively, taken as 2 tablets daily for 8 weeks), as well as a dietary supplement containing hydrolyzed collagen, unhydrolyzed type II collagen, vitamin D, vitamin C, selenium, manganese, and vitamin B6 (11,000 mg, 20 mg, 10 mcg, 48 mg, 27.5 mcg, 0.3 mg, and 1.4 mg per vial, respectively) to improve physical functioning [329].
LoR CLE 2Level of recommendation C (level of evidence 2).
Comments: in a single-center prospective comparative study, the use of the combination product in patients with osteoarthritis and chronic pain syndrome was associated with a 76% reduction in WOMAC pain scores (p = 0.04) and a 74% reduction in Visual Analog Scale pain scores (p < 0.05), as well as improved functional parameters (walking speed + 12%, Timed Up and Go test time - 42%).
It is recommended to administer resveratrol supplements at a dose of 500–1000 mg once daily in combination with physical exercise to improve muscle strength and function in sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity [330, 331].
LoR CLE 3Level of recommendation C (level of evidence 3).
Comments: the combination of resveratrol and physical exercise may represent a more effective strategy for reversing sarcopenia than exercise alone. Furthermore, the combination of training and resveratrol demonstrated safety and good tolerability.
It is recommended to administer L-carnitine at a dose of 1000–1500 mg daily in elderly individuals with sarcopenia and frailty to improve muscle strength and function [332].
GCR BLOCE 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 2).
Comments: in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in elderly individuals with frailty syndrome and decreased muscle strength, a 10-week course of levocarnitine at a dose of 1.5 g/day led to a significant improvement in frailty index and handgrip strength compared to the placebo group. Levocarnitine supplementation demonstrated a favorable effect on functional status and fatigue in elderly individuals with sarcopenia and frailty.
It is recommended to prescribe Traumeel S to patients with sarcopenia performing a set of therapeutic exercises to improve tolerance to physical exercises used for the treatment of sarcopenia, as well as in post-traumatic conditions (dislocation, sprains of ligaments, tendons, and muscles) resulting from falls, in order to reduce pain intensity and resolve trauma [336, 337].
GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4).
Comments: by reducing fiber damage and the inflammatory response, Traumeel S helps patients with sarcopenia better tolerate strength training and recover muscle function faster. Less muscle fiber damage and attenuated inflammation allow for an earlier return to training, thereby increasing the total training stimulus, which is critical for combating atrophy. The reduction in ICAM-1 and neutrophils means less secondary tissue destruction and oxidative stress—factors that exacerbate sarcopenia. In RCTs, Traumeel S significantly reduced pain and swelling: up to 65–85% of participants achieved pain-free mobility by days 8–10, and the efficacy of the drug was comparable to diclofenac with better tolerability.
It is recommended that patients with sarcopenia include whole-body vibration training, electromyostimulation, and stabilometric simulators (A22.30.006 Vibrational exposure; A17.02.001 Muscle electrical stimulation; A19.30.011 Biofeedback training using support reaction) in their treatment program to increase muscle strength and improve physical performance [281-287].
GCR BLOCE 2Grade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence 2).
Comments: whole-body vibration (WBV) training programs for 12 weeks showed improved muscle strength and tone in elderly individuals [281-282].
The method of muscle electrical stimulation (ES) can be an additional training option to improve muscle function and strength in patients with sarcopenia during a 4-week rehabilitation program. ES provides improved skeletal muscle function with additional potential health benefits for patients with sarcopenia suffering from heart disease and orthopedic conditions [283-285].
It has also been shown that the ES method can be used in elderly individuals with sarcopenia who may not be able to perform regular physical activity, by modulating similar exercise-related factors [285]. Progressive training on stabilometric platforms can improve skeletal muscle mass and function. The dynamic antigravity postural system ensures postural stability and enhances proprioceptive, vestibular, and visual sensitivities, reducing the risk of falls in the elderly [286-287].
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
Patients with sarcopenia, including those who have undergone acute illness or surgery, as well as individuals with secondary sarcopenia, require longer rehabilitation due to a decreased level of functional activity. Rehabilitation can be carried out in a rehabilitation center or department (if a geriatric rehabilitation specialist is available) or a geriatric department after receiving specialized or high-tech medical care.
For the effective correction of progressive loss of muscle mass and its function in sarcopenia, it is necessary to use personalized and effective strategies for prevention, early-stage diagnosis, and medical rehabilitation complexes [224].
The goal of rehabilitation in sarcopenia is to minimize the loss of muscle mass and function, which is achieved by increasing physical activity, ensuring adequate nutrition, and providing a set of non-pharmacological interventions to improve the functional status of patients [226].
It is recommended to prescribe rehabilitation interventions for overweight, obese, and sarcopenic patients with the aim of reducing body weight and improving quality of life [254].
GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4).
Comment: obesity exacerbates the course of sarcopenia, promotes fat infiltration of muscles, and impairs physical function [250–253]. A Korean national study (2008–2009) involving 2,264 elderly patients revealed a sarcopenia prevalence of approximately 12% and sarcopenic obesity in about 2/3 of cases. Moderate and high physical activity reduced the risk of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in men (38–74%); in women, only high activity reduced the likelihood of sarcopenic obesity [254].
It is recommended that patients with sarcopenia and concomitant osteoporosis be prescribed rehabilitation programs including training of major muscle groups to increase muscle strength and reduce the risk of falls and fractures [261, 262, 326, 327].
GCR CLEL 5Level of recommendation evidence C (level of data reliability 5).
Comment: osteoporotic fractures are known to be associated with a significant decrease in muscle strength, low sarcopenic index values, as well as a decrease in fat mass and percentage, indicating an increased risk of developing sarcopenia [261].
A study by Marchenkova L.A. et al. (2024) investigated the efficacy of comprehensive rehabilitation after hip arthroplasty in patients with femoral neck fracture against the background of osteoporosis. The program included: supervised dynamic exercises under the guidance of an exercise therapy instructor, training on an interactive treadmill with biofeedback, specialized hip muscle strength training, and pulsed laser therapy of the hip joint (infrared range, 80 Hz, 20 W). After 12 days, there was an increase in the total Harris score (p = 0.034) and maximum hip extension strength (p = 0.041), an increase in walking speed and improvement in walking biomechanics—an increase in the right step length after 12 days (p = 0.036) and a reduction in step width after 60 days (p = 0.22), rapid regression of pain syndrome, improved physical functioning, increased lower limb muscle strength, and improved basic motor and coordination abilities [262]. 5.
Sanatorium-resort treatment is recommended for patients with sarcopenia to reduce disease progression, improve quality of life, and enhance functional capabilities [255].
GCR CLOCE 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence 4).
Comment: the clinical benefits of balneotherapy in patients with musculoskeletal diseases are due to its ability to reduce serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6), which leads to a decrease in pain syndrome and improved functional capabilities [255-260].
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
Prevention of sarcopenia includes measures aimed at maintaining skeletal muscle mass and function, preventing falls in healthy older and elderly individuals, as well as preventing falls and fractures in individuals with diagnosed sarcopenia.
It is recommended to prescribe a set of physical exercises, a diet, and lifestyle changes for all individuals aged 60 years and older in order to preserve muscle mass, strength, and physical performance, as well as to prevent falls and fractures [290-293].
GRL ALEL 1Grade of Recommendation A (Level of Evidence 1).
Comments: non-pharmacological approaches, including physical exercise, diet, and lifestyle changes, can help prevent sarcopenia. Traditional exercise methods, including strength training and aerobic exercise, have a positive effect on muscle strength, physical performance, and muscle mass in healthy elderly individuals [274, 288-289]. Lack of physical activity is an important factor in the development of sarcopenia [290]. To prevent falls and improve coordination, balance exercise programs, resistance exercises, as well as yoga and tai chi are indicated [291].
Protein intake of 0.8 g/kg of body weight/day will help slow down bone mass loss and reduce the risk of proximal femur fractures [292].
Individual balance training exercises and resistance exercises are preferred over group classes [293]. Progressive training on stabilometric platforms can improve skeletal muscle mass and function. The dynamic antigravity postural system ensures postural stability and increases proprioceptive, vestibular, and visual sensitivities, reducing the risk of falls in elderly individuals [286-295]. Physical therapy, such as electromyostimulation and whole-body vibration, can be an important component of training to improve muscle function for the prevention of falls and fractures [221, 282, 285].
For preventive purposes, it is advisable to conduct group and individual educational programs for elderly and senile patients living at home in order to prevent the development and progression of sarcopenia. Health education for young and elderly people using 4–6 minute videos on sarcopenia and its risk factors has a positive effect on the development of sarcopenia. Video recordings of 30-minute physical exercises help improve muscle strength in both men and women. Raising awareness about sarcopenia and its prevention has a positive effect in elderly individuals [263-266].
When providing preventive counseling to elderly and senile individuals, it is necessary to take into account age-related features of correcting risk factors for chronic non-communicable diseases and the high likelihood of polypharmacy. It is necessary to orient the patient not only toward eliminating the symptoms of existing chronic diseases, but also toward healthy longevity and an active lifestyle. All patients should be counseled on regular physical activity, nutrition, clinical and psychological training, organizing a safe home environment, and medication intake rules.
It is recommended that patients with signs of depression, sensory deficits (hearing or vision loss), or chronic pain receive consultations from specialized medical doctors and be monitored by a general practitioner (district physician) in accordance with the current procedure for preventive examinations and clinical health check-ups (Preventive visit (examination, consultation) by a general practitioner (district physician), Follow-up visit (examination, consultation) by a general practitioner (district physician)) in order to assess the dynamics of identified geriatric syndromes and the effectiveness of measures for their correction [121, 317].
GCR CLEL 5Level of recommendation evidence C (level of data reliability 5).
It is recommended to establish clinical follow-up for elderly and senile patients, taking into account the identified diseases, and in the presence of a combination of sarcopenia and frailty syndrome—by a geriatrician (Follow-up visit (examination, consultation) by a geriatrician) with the drafting of an individualized management plan developed on the basis of a CGA (Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment of functional and cognitive status) in order to create a personalized treatment, rehabilitation, and care plan. CGA is performed at least once a year or as needed upon the development of acute functional decline [121, 317].
GCR CLEL 5Level of recommendation evidence C (level of data reliability 5).
6. Organization of Medical Care
The attending physician for a patient with sarcopenia is a general practitioner (district physician) (general practitioner (family doctor)). Indications for a consultation with a geriatrician are listed in section 2.5.
Indications for hospitalization in a medical organization
For the majority of patients with sarcopenia, in the event of an exacerbation of chronic diseases, it is preferable to provide medical care at home, provided that the necessary volume of diagnostic and therapeutic care can be ensured. If there are difficulties associated with conducting the necessary examinations and selecting therapy in a home setting, it is recommended to consider hospitalizing the patient with sarcopenia in a department matching the profile of the underlying disease.
Indications for patient hospitalization in the geriatric department
An indication for patient hospitalization in a geriatric department is the combination of sarcopenia and frailty syndrome.
Referral of a patient with sarcopenia and frailty syndrome for hospitalization in a geriatric department is carried out by a general practitioner (district physician), general practitioner (family doctor), geriatrician, or other specialist doctors.
Indications for patient discharge from a medical organization
1) Completion of examination, treatment, and rehabilitation regarding the underlying disease that caused hospitalization.
2) Improvement in the functional activity level of the patient with sarcopenia or substantiation of the impossibility of improvement.
7. Additional Information
The mechanisms of sarcopenia continue to be actively studied, and it is already clear that there is no universal mechanism for the age-related loss of muscle mass quantity and quality. Sarcopenia is a multifactorial syndrome with a complex interdisciplinary pathogenesis. According to modern concepts, muscle tissue acts as one of the most significant human endocrine organs, as it produces a large amount of biologically active substances, hormonoids, and special cytokines (myokines). The latter are cellular regulators of growth and breakdown and support the function of muscle mitochondria; accordingly, both mitochondrial dysfunction (characteristic of all age-associated diseases) and sarcopenia exacerbate each other and form a vicious circle of progressive functional insufficiency in elderly patient groups. Therefore, it is so important to conduct mass screening and detect sarcopenia as early as possible in the modern population.
Data from the UK Biobank, containing information on 499,046 patients, demonstrate that patients with multimorbidity have almost twice the probability of sarcopenia compared to those without a combination of multiple diseases (OR 1.96 [95% CI: 1.91, 2.02]) [296].
A number of studies emphasize the high prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with cardiovascular diseases, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver diseases, musculoskeletal system diseases, endocrine and neurological diseases, and ophthalmological pathology [296-300]. The association between sarcopenia and chronic non-communicable diseases is unfavorable and worsens the prognosis in elderly patients. Presumably, achieving compensation for concomitant pathology will help improve the condition of the muscular system.
Sarcopenia can be a significant risk factor for frequent hospitalizations of elderly individuals [301]. Sarcopenia is a multifactorial disease of elderly and senile individuals who have already established multiple chronic comorbid diseases and identified complications with varying degrees of impaired body functions. This combination leads to a restriction of motor activity in elderly patients and, accordingly, to repeated hospitalizations and restricted patient activity, which in turn exacerbates the manifestations of sarcopenia.
One of the main manifestations of sarcopenia is falls, which are frequently accompanied by injuries of varying severity, which also leads to repeated and prolonged hospitalizations. In addition, sarcopenia is considered a predictor of future fractures in elderly individuals, which increases the risk of subsequent (repeated) hospitalizations as well.
It should be noted that sarcopenia is associated with human cognitive functions, so early detection of this disease will reduce the risk of cognitive impairment in clinical practice [302].
Taking into account its multifactorial nature and combined comorbidity, sarcopenia increases the risk of all-cause mortality by 3.6 times in elderly and senile individuals [303].
Elderly patients with DM are at a higher risk of developing geriatric syndromes, including sarcopenia, which is known to be characterized by a progressive and generalized loss of muscle mass and strength [304-305]. DM accelerates the decline in muscle mass and strength due to hyperglycemia, the progression of diabetes complications, concomitant obesity, insulin resistance, and the activation of inflammatory cytokines [306-308]. The combination of excess weight and reduced muscle mass and/or strength has been defined as "sarcopenic obesity" [309]. These pathological conditions associated with alterations in muscle tissue "quality" in turn contribute significantly to the perpetuation of insulin resistance and exacerbate glycemic control impairments by reducing glucose uptake by muscles. An important risk factor for the development and progression of sarcopenia in T2D is chronic hyperglycemia. Hyperglycemia accelerates the loss of muscle mass, while an increase in the concentration of advanced glycation end products contributes to a reduction in muscle strength. Thus, accumulating in skeletal muscles and cartilage, advanced glycation end products reduce their elasticity in patients with diabetes. It has been established that high levels of glycation end products are associated with poorer handgrip dynamometry performance and low walking speed in elderly individuals [304]. Therefore, efforts should be made to achieve target glycemic goals. Hyperglycemia-related weight loss can lead to the loss of both muscle mass and muscle strength. Additionally, weight loss may be driven by decreased appetite and adherence to low-calorie diets. Certain medications used in diabetes (e.g., GLP-1 receptor agonists) can affect not only fat mass but also muscle mass [294]. When prescribing drugs that affect body weight, physical exercise should be recommended to counteract the loss of muscle mass.
Sex-specific features of the alteration and preservation of muscle mass in the body are well known. Thus, testosterone is a potent mitochondrial protector, and its age-related deficiency leads to mitochondrial dysfunction in Leydig cells, which is considered one of the key molecular mechanisms of late-onset hypogonadism, the prevalence of which reaches 20% in men over 60 years of age and increases to 50% after 80 years. Lower testosterone concentrations are associated with a decrease in both skeletal muscle mass and strength.
A similar trend is observed in postmenopausal women. There is a positive correlation between the reduction in muscle mass and estrogen levels. Furthermore, estrogen may exert a direct anabolic effect on muscle fibers, as skeletal muscle cell membranes contain beta-estrogen receptors.
Low levels of sex hormones are significantly associated with obesity and insulin resistance through the mechanisms of sarcopenia (deficiency in the quantity and quality of skeletal muscles), since glucose utilization occurs primarily in muscle tissue.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria | Yes | Absent |
|---|---|---|---|
1 | An assessment of complaints (therapeutic history and symptom taking) characteristic of sarcopenia was performed at each examination of patients aged 60 years and older. | ||
2 | Anthropometric assessments were performed in all patients aged 60 years and older during each visit (initial/follow-up visit (examination, consultation) by a general practitioner / primary care physician). | ||
3 | Handgrip strength measurements and the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) were performed in all patients aged 60 years and older to identify low muscle strength and assess muscle function. | ||
4 | Serum 25-OH vitamin D levels were measured in patients older than 60 years. | ||
5 | Serum albumin levels were measured in patients aged 60 years and older. | ||
6 | A structured exercise program (therapeutic physical training) was prescribed to all patients with sarcopenia aged 60 years and older. | ||
7 | Patients with sarcopenia and vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency were prescribed cholecalciferol**. |
References
Show references
A. J Cruz-Jentoft, G. Bahat, J.Bauer et all. Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2, Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis, Age and Ageing, Volume 48, Issue 1, January 2019, Pages 16–31
[Chatzipetrou V., Bégin M.J., Hars M., Trombetti A. Sarcopenia in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Scoping Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Association with Outcomes, and Treatment. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2022;110:1–31. doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00898-1].
[Cruz-Jentoft A.J., Sayer A.A. Sarcopenia. Lancet. 2019; 393:2636-2646].
Landi F., Liperoti R., Russo A., Giovannini S., Tosato M., Barillaro C., Capoluongo E., Bernabei R., Onder G. Association of anorexia with sarcopenia in a community-dwelling elderly population: Results from the il SIRENTE study. Eur. J. Nutr. 2013;52:1261–1268. doi: 10.1007/s00394-012-0437-y
Legrand D., Vaes B., Matheï C., Swine C., Degryse J. The prevalence of sarcopenia in very old individuals according to the European consensus definition: Insights from the BELFRAIL study. Age Ageing. 2013;42:727–734. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft128.
Sakuma, K. Sarcopenia and age-related endocrine function / K. Sakuma, A. Yamaguchi // Int. J. Endocrinol. –– 2012. –– Vol. 2012. –– P. 127362.
Kwak JY, Hwang H, Kim SK et al (2018) Prediction of sarcopenia using a combination of multiple serum biomarkers. Sci Rep 8:8574.
[Degeneration of neuromuscular junction in age and dystrophy / R. Rudolf, M.M. Khan, S. Labeit, M.R. Deschenes // Front. Aging. Neurosci. –– 2014. –– Vol 6. –– P. 99].
[Y. Dionyssiotis. Frailty and Sarcopenia - Onset, Development and Clinical Challenges. 2017. P. 243. ISBN 978-953-51-3484-8. doi.org/10.5772/65153].
[Adams GR, Bamman MM. Characterization and regulation of mechanical loading-induced compensatory muscle hypertrophy. Compr Physiol. 2012;2(4):2829-2870].
[Sarcopenia: assessment of disease burden and strategies to improve outcomes / I. Liguori, G. Russo, L. Aran [et al.] // Clin. Interv. Aging. –– 2018. –– Vol. 13. –– P. 913–927].
[Bauer, J., et al. "Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group." Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 14.8 (2013): 542-559].
[Morton, R. W., et al. "A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression of the effect of protein supplementation on resistance training-induced gains in muscle mass and strength in healthy adults." British Journal of Sports Medicine 52.6 (2018): 376-384].
[Girgis CM, Clifton-Bligh RJ, Mokbel N, Cheng K, Gunton JE. Vitamin D signaling regulates proliferation, differentiation, and myotube size in C2C12 skeletal muscle cells. Endocrinology. 2014 Feb;155(2):347-57. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1205. Epub 2013 Nov 26. PMID: 24280059].
[Ceglia L. Vitamin D and its role in skeletal muscle. Curr Opin Clin NutrMetab Care. 2009 Nov;12(6):628-33. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328331c707. PMID: 19770647; PMCID: PMC2901845].
[Zakharova I.N. Modern view on vitamin D metabolism and physiological effects in the human body / I.N. Zakharova, Yu.A. Dmitrieva, S.V. Yablochkova // Vestnik AGIUV. –– 2013. –– No. 2. –– P. 27–31].
[Vitamin D metabolism disorders in obesity / I.I. Dedov, N.V. Mazurina, N.A. Ogneva [et al.] // Obesity and Metabolism. –– 2011. –– Vol. 2. –– P. 1–10].
[Review series Cellular senescence and the senescent secretory phenotype: therapeutic opportunities / T. Tchkonia, Y. Zhu, J. Deursen [et al.] // J. Clin. Invest. 2013. Vol. 123, N 3. P. 966–972].
[Lutz, C.T. Sarcopenia, obesity, and natural killer cell immune senescence in aging: altered cytokine levels as a common mechanism / C.T. Lutz, L.S. Quinn // Aging (Milano). 2012. Vol. 4, N 8. P. 535–546.
[Human resistin inhibits myogenic differentiation and induces insulin resistance in myocytes / C.H. Sheng, Z.W. Du, Y. Song [et al.] // BioMed. Research. International. –– 2013. –– Vol. 2013. P. 804632].
Exercise, inflammation and aging / J.A. Woods, K.R. Wilund, S.A. Martin, B.M. Kistler // Aging Dis. –– 2012. –– Vol. 3, N 1. –– P. 130–140.
Liguori I, Russo G, Curcio F, et al. Oxidative stress, aging, and diseases. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:757-772. Published 2018 Apr 26. doi:10.2147/CIA.S158513].
Meng SJ, Yu LJ. Oxidative stress, molecular inflammation and sarcopenia. Int J Mol Sci. 2010 Apr 12;11(4):1509-26. doi: 10.3390/ijms11041509. PMID: 20480032; PMCID: PMC2871128].
Calvani R, Joseph AM, Adhihetty PJ, Miccheli A, Bossola M, Leeuwenburgh C, Bernabei R, Marzetti E. Mitochondrial pathways in sarcopenia of aging and disuse muscle atrophy. Biol Chem. 2013 Mar;394(3):393-414. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2012-0247. PMID: 23154422; PMCID: PMC3976204].
[R.V. Musci, K. L. Hamilton, B. F. Miller. Targeting mitochondrial function and proteostasis to mitigate Dynapenia. Eur J ApplPhysiol. 2017. DOI 10.1007/s00421-017-3730-x].
Ch. Beaudart, M. Zaaria, F. Pasleau, J-Y Reginster, O. Bruyère. Health Outcomes of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoSONE. 2017. 12(1): e0169548. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169548]
The prevalence of sarcopenia in older age groups: evaluation of diagnostic criteria / Yu.A. Safonova, E.G. Zotkin // Scientific and Practical Rheumatology. – 2010. – No. 58 (2). – P. 147–153].
Bocharova K.A., Gerasimenko A.V., Zhaboeva S.L. Study of the prevalence of sarcopenia in patients in the primary health care system // Modern Problems of Science and Education. – 2014. – No. 6].
A J Mayhew, K Amog, S Phillips, G Parise, P D McNicholas, R J de Souza, L Thabane, P Raina, The prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults, an exploration of differences between studies and within definitions: a systematic review and meta-analyses, Age and Ageing, Volume 48, Issue 1, January 2019, Pages 48–56]
Cruz-Jentoft A. J., Landi F., Schneider S. M., et al. Prevalence of and and Sex-Specific Changes in Lower in ageing adults: a systematic review. Report of the International SarcopeniaInitiative (EWGSOP and IWGS) 2014 Nov; 43(6): 748–759].
M. C. Espinel‐Bermúdez, E. Ramírez‐García2, C. García‐Peña et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia in community‐dwelling older people of Mexico City using the EGWSOP (European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People) diagnostic criteria. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle ‐ Clinical Reports. 2017. Volume 2. Issue 2. e00009].
J.Pacifico , M.A.J.Geerlings, E.M.Reijnierse et.al. Prevalence of sarcopenia as a comorbid disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Experimental Gerontology. 2020. Vol. 131, 110801].
E. Benz, K. Trajanoska, L. Lahousse et.al. Sarcopenia in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev 2019; 28: 190049, https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0049-2019]
V. A. de Souza, D. Oliveira, S. R. Barbosa et al. Sarcopenia in patients with chronic kidney disease not yet on dialysis: Analysis of the prevalence and associated factors. PLoS ONE. 2017. 12 (4): e0176230
Ji-H. Moon, Mi-H. Kong, H-Ju Kim. Relationship between low muscle mass and anemia in Korean elderly men: Using the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES IV–V). Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics Volume 6, Issue 4, December 2015, Pages 115-119.
Dunne R.F., Roussel B., Culakova E., Pandya C., Fleming F.J., Hensley B., Magnuson A.M., Loh K.P., Gilles M., Ramsdale E., et al. Characterizing cancer cachexia in the geriatric oncology population. J. Geriatr. Oncol. 2019;10:415–419.
B. Kirk, J. Zanker, G. Duque. Osteosarcopenia: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment—facts and numbers. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2020; 11: 609–618
H. Amirthalingam, F.M. Cicuttini, Y. Wang et al. Association between sarcopenia and osteoarthritisrelated knee structural changes: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2019. 27(1):S472]
[Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE, Cawthon PM, McLean RR, Harris TB, Ferrucci L, Guralnik JM, Fragala MS, Kenny AM, Kiel DP, Kritchevsky SB, Shardell MD, Dam TT, Vassileva MT. The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J GerontolA Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014 May;69(5):547-58. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glu010. PMID: 24737557; PMCID: PMC3991146].
[SARC-F: a symptom score to predict persons with sarcopenia at risk for poor functional outcomes. / T.K. Malmstrom, D.K. Miller, E.M. Simonsick [et al.] // J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. –– 2016. –– Vol. 7, N 1. –– P. 28–36].
[Sarcopenia through the eyes of an endocrinologist / N.G. Mokrysheva, Yu.A. Krupinova, V.L. Volodicheva [et al.] // Obesity and Metabolism. — 2018. — Vol. 15, No. 3. — P. 21–27.]
[Pinedo-Villanueva, R. Health Care Costs Associated With Muscle Weakness: A UK PopulationBased Estimate / R. Pinedo-Villanueva, L. D. Westbury, H. E. Syddall // Calcified Tissue International. — 2019. — Vol. 104, N 2. — P. 137–144].
[Quality of life and fatigue syndrome in elderly patients with sarcopenia / Yu.A. Safonova, E.G. Zotkin, N.V. Toroptsova // Modern Rheumatology. – 2021. – Vol. 15. No. 6. – P. 41–47. DOI: 10.14412/1996-7012-2021-6-41-47].
[Chew, S.T.H., Kayambu, G., Lew, C.C.H. etal. Singapore multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on muscle health in older adults: assessment and multimodal targeted intervention across the continuum of care. BMC Geriatr 21, 314 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02240-8].
[Kim CO, Lee KR. Preventive effect of protein-energy supplementation on the functional decline of frail older adults with low socioeconomic status: a community-based randomized controlled study. J GerontolA Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Mar;68(3):309-16. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls167].
[Stessman J, Jacobs JM, Ein-Mor E, Bursztyn M. Normal body mass index rather than obesity predicts greater mortality in elderly people: the Jerusalem longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Dec;57(12):2232-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02567.x].
[Chalermsri C, Aekplakorn W, Srinonprasert V. Body Mass Index Combined With Possible Sarcopenia Status Is Better Than BMI or Possible Sarcopenia Status Alone for Predicting All-Cause Mortality Among Asian Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Front Nutr. 2022 Jun 30;9:881121].
[Curtis M, Swan L, Fox R, Warters A, O'Sullivan M. Associations between Body Mass Index and Probable Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Nutrients. 2023 Mar 21;15(6):1505].
[Wang Y, Luo D, Liu J, Song Y, Jiang B, Jiang H (2023) Low skeletal muscle mass index and all-cause mortality risk in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. PLoS ONE 18(6): e0286745].
[Duarte MP, Almeida LS, Neri SGR, Oliveira JS, Wilkinson TJ, Ribeiro HS, Lima RM. Prevalence of sarcopenia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024 Apr;15(2):501-512. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13425. Epub 2024 Jan 24. PMID: 38263952; PMCID: PMC10995263].
[Sepúlveda-Loyola W, Osadnik C, Phu S, Morita AA, Duque G, Probst VS. Diagnosis, prevalence, and clinical impact of sarcopenia in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Oct;11(5):1164-1176. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12600. Epub 2020 Aug 30. PMID: 32862514; PMCID: PMC7567149].
[Zhang Y, Zhang J, Ni W, Yuan X, Zhang H, Li P, Xu J, Zhao Z. Sarcopenia in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):1007-1017. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13255. Epub 2021 Feb 11. PMID: 33576177; PMCID: PMC8006658].
[Feng L, Gao Q, Hu K, Wu M, Wang Z, Chen F, Mei F, Zhao L, Ma B. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Sarcopenia in Patients With Diabetes: A Meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Apr 19;107(5):1470-1483. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab884. PMID: 34904651].
[Jang MK, Park S, Raszewski R, Park CG, Doorenbos AZ, Kim S. Prevalence and clinical implications of sarcopenia in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer. 2024 May 3;32(5):328. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08532-0. PMID: 38702479].
[Ligthart-Melis GC, Luiking YC, Kakourou A, Cederholm T, Maier AB, de van der Schueren MAE. Frailty, Sarcopenia, and Malnutrition Frequently (Co-)occur in Hospitalized Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Sep;21(9):1216-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.03.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21. PMID: 32327302].
[Davies B. et al. Relationship between sarcopenia and frailty in the Toledo study of healthy aging: a population based cross-sectional study // Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. – 2018. – Vol. 19. – No. 4. – P. 282-286].
[Suzan V., Kanat B. B., Yavuzer H. Association of sarcopenia with geriatric syndromes and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio // Medicine. – 2022. – Vol. 11. – No. 2. – P. 645-50].
[Buta, B.J. Frailty assessment instruments: systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly - cited instruments / B.J. Buta [et al.] // Ageing Res. Rev. - 2016. – Vol. 26. - P. 53–61].
[Morley JE, Arai H, Cao L, Dong B, Merchant RA, Vellas B, Visvanathan R, Woo J. Integrated Care: Enhancing the Role of the Primary Health Care Professional in Preventing Functional Decline: A Systematic Review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(6):489-494].
[S. S.Y. Yeung, E. M. Reijnierse, V. K. Pham et al. Sarcopenia and its association with falls and fractures in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle 2019; 10: 485–500].
[X. Zhang, P. Huang, Q. Dou et.al. Falls among older adults with sarcopenia dwelling in nursing home orcommunity: A meta-analysis. Clinical Nutrition . 2020. Vol.39. P. 33-39].
[Yang, M., Liu, Y., Zuo, Y. et al. Sarcopenia for predicting falls and hospitalization in community-dwelling older adults: EWGSOP versus EWGSOP2. SciRep 9, 17636 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53522-6].
[Xu J. et al. Sarcopenia is associated with mortality in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Gerontology. – 2022. – Vol. 68. – No. 4. – P. 361-376].
[Sarcopenia as a risk factor for falls and fractures / Yu.A. Safonova // The Clinician. - 2019. – Vol. 13 No. 3-4. – P. 22-28. DOI: 10.17650/1818-8338-2019-13-3-4-22-28].
[Beaudart C, Sanchez-Rodriguez D, Locquet M, Reginster JY, Lengelé L, Bruyère O. Malnutrition as a Strong Predictor of the Onset of Sarcopenia. Nutrients. 2019;11(12):2883. Published 2019 Nov 27. doi:10.3390/nu11122883].
[Gao Q, Hu K, Yan C, Zhao B, Mei F, Chen F, Zhao L, Shang Y, Ma Y, Ma B. Associated Factors of Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2021 Nov 27;13(12):4291. doi: 10.3390/nu13124291].
[Almohaisen N, Gittins M, Todd C, Sremanakova J, Sowerbutts AM, Aldossari A, Almutairi A, Jones D, Burden S. Prevalence of Undernutrition, Frailty and Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling People Aged 50 Years and Above: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2022 Apr 7;14(8):1537. doi: 10.3390/nu14081537].
[Crovetto Mattassi, Mirta, Camila Henríquez Mella, and Lissette Pérez Bocaz. 2022. "Association between Sarcopenia and Nutritional Status in Chilean Older People Aged 65 Years and Older" Nutrients 14, no. 24: 5228. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245228].
[L.M.G. Verstraeten, J.P. van Wijngaarden, J. Pacifico, E.M. Reijnierse, C.G.M. Meskers, A.B. Maier. Association between malnutrition and stages of sarcopenia in geriatric rehabilitation inpatients: RESORT. Clinical Nutrition 40 (2021) 4090e4096].
[D. Eglseer, S. Eminovic and C. Lohrmann Association Between Sarcopenia and Nutritional Status in Older Adults: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 2016;42(7):33–41. DOI: 30.3928/00989134-20160613-03].
[Chew, S.T.H., Tey, S.L., Yalawar, M. et al. Prevalence and associated factors of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults at risk of malnutrition. BMC Geriatr 22, 997 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-022-03704-1].
[Chen J, Wang X, Xu Z. Sarcopenia and Chronic Pain in the Elderly: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain Res. 2023 Oct 26;16:3569-3581. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S435866. PMID: 37908777; PMCID: PMC10614663].
[Lin T, Dai M, Xu P, Sun L, Shu X, Xia X, Zhao Y, Song Q, Guo D, Deng C, Yue J. Prevalence of Sarcopenia in Pain Patients and Correlation Between the Two Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 May;23(5):902.e1-902.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.02.005. Epub 2022 Mar 23. PMID: 35339458].
[De Ceuninck F, Fradin A, Pastoureau P. Bearing arms against osteoarthritis and sarcopenia: when cartilage and skeletal muscle find common interest in talking together. Drug Discov Today. 2013].
[Karasik D, Kiel DP. Evidence for pleiotropic factors in genetics of the musculoskeletal system. Bone. 2010. 46:1226–1237].
[V. G. Moreira , M. Perez , I R. A. Lourenc¸o. Prevalence of sarcopenia and its associated factors: the impact of muscle mass, gait speed, and handgrip strength reference values on reported frequencies. CLINICS 2019;74:e477].
[Hu P. et al. The effect of social isolation on sarcopenia: a longitudinal study among the middle-aged and older population in China // Gerontology. – 2023. – Vol. 69. – No. 6. – P. 748-756].
[Cheng L, Sit JWH, Chan HYL, Choi KC, Cheung RKY, Wong MMH, Li FYK, Lee TY, Fung ESM, Tai KM, So WKW. Sarcopenia risk and associated factors among Chinese community-dwelling older adults living alone. SciRep. 2021 Nov 15;11(1):22219. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01614-7].
[S.-H. Tseng, W.-Ju Lee, Li-N. Peng, M.-H. Lin, L.-K. Chen. Associations between hemoglobin levels and sarcopenia and its components: Results from the I-Lan longitudinal study. Experimental Gerontology, 2021. Vol. 150. P. 111379].
[S. Dai, S. Wang, Y. He, C. Dai, J. Yu, X. Ma. Association between anemia and sarcopenia among Chinese elderly: A cross-sectional study based on the China health and retirement longitudinal study. Experimental Gerontology. 2023. Vol. 177. P. 112183].
[Serum markers of inflammation and oxidative stress in sarcopenia / B. Can, O. Kara, M.C. Kizilarslanoglu [et al.] // Aging Clin. Exp. Res. –– 2017. –– Vol. 29, N 4. –– P. 745–752].
[Sarcopenia and Low Serum Albumin Level Synergistically Increase the Risk of Incident Disability in Older Adults / K. Uemura, T. Doi, S. Lee, H. Shimada // J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. –– 2019. –– Vol. 20, N 1. –– P. 90–93].
[Safonova Yu.A. [Serological markers of sarcopenia in individuals aged 65 years and older]. The Clinician. 2023;17(4):19-26. (In Russ.) DOI: 0.17650/1818-8338-2023-17-4-K699].
[Trierweiler H. et al. Sarcopenia: a chronic complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus //Diabetology & metabolic syndrome. – 2018. – Vol. 10. – №. 1. – P. 1-9].
[Bojko M. Causes of sarcopenia in liver cirrhosis //Clinical Liver Disease. – 2019. – Vol. 14. – №. 5. – P. 167].
[Hanai T. et al. Sarcopenia impairs prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis //Nutrition. – 2015. – Vol. 31. – №. 1. – P. 193-199.].
[Xu B. et al. Factors affecting sarcopenia in older patients with chronic diseases //Ann Palliat. Med. – 2022. – Vol. 11. – №. 3. – P. 972-83].
[Bulut E. A. et al. Vitamin B12 deficiency might be related to sarcopenia in older adults //Experimental gerontology. – 2017. – Vol. 95. – P. 136-140].
[Shokri-Mashhadi N. et al. Association of circulating C-reactive protein and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein with components of sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies //Experimental gerontology. – 2021. – Vol. 150. – P. 111330].
[Tuttle, C.S.L. Markers of inflammation and their association with muscle strength and mass: A systematic review and meta-analysis / C.S.L. Tuttle, L.A.N. Thang, A. B. Maier // Ageing Research Reviews. –– 2020. –– Vol. 64. –– P. 101185].
[Inflammation and sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis / G. Bano, C. Trevisan, S. Carraro [et al.] // Maturitas. –– 2017. –– Vol. 96. –– P. 10–15].
[Significance of serum immune markers in identification of global functional impairment in the oldest old: cross-sectional results from the BELFRAIL study / W. Adriaensen, C. Matheï, G. van Pottelbergh [et al.] // AGE. –– 2014. –– Vol. 36, N 1. –– P. 457–467].
[Yuenyongchaiwat K, Akekawatchai C. Systemic Inflammation in Sarcopenia Alter Functional Capacity in Thai Community-dwelling Older People: A Preliminary Observational Study. CurrAgingSci. 2022 Aug 4;15(3):274-281. doi: 10.2174/1874609815666220513141300].
[The association between blood concentration of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and sarcopenia: a meta-analysis / J. Luo, Z. Quan, S. Lin, L. Cui // Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. –– 2018. –– Vol. 27, N 6. –– P.1258–1270].
[Remelli F, Vitali A, Zurlo A, Volpato S. Vitamin D Deficiency and Sarcopenia in Older Persons. Nutrients. 2019; 11(12):2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11122861].
[Yang, A., Lv, Q., Chen, F., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Shi, W., Liu, Y., and Wang, D. (2020) The effect of vitamin D on sarcopenia depends on the level of physical activity in older adults, Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 11, 678– 689.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12545].
[Yoo, J-I, Chung, HJ, Kim, BG, et al. Comparative analysis of the association between various serum vitamin D biomarkers and sarcopenia. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021; 35:e23946. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23946].
[Khan et al. Impact of Vitamin D Level on Sarcopenia in Elderly People. Journal of Health and Allied Sciences. 2023. Open access. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760090].
[Annweiler C, Beauchet O. Questioning vitamin D status of elderly fallers and nonfallers: a meta-analysis to address a 'forgotten step'. J Intern Med. 2015 Jan;277(1):16-44. doi: 10.1111/joim.12250].
[Wang, N., Chen, Y., Ji, J. et al. The relationship between serum vitamin D and fracture risk in the elderly: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 15, 81 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01603-y].
[Singh PK, O’Sullivan L, Vankara A, Raad M, Aiyer AA. Vitamin D Status and Fracture Healing: A Systematic Review of 63 Studies. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics. 2022;7(4). doi:10.1177/2473011421S00943].
[Heath AK, Kim IY, Hodge AM, English DR, Muller DC. Vitamin D Status and Mortality: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 29;16(3):383. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030383].
[Safonova Yu.A., Toroptsova N.V. [Vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency, risk factors and its correction in elderly people]. Russian Medical Journal. 2021;(6):96-100. (In Russ.)].
[Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in the elderly with sarcopenia in north-west of Russia / Yu. A. Safonova, E.G. Zotkin, G.M. Glazunova // Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Medicine. – 2019. – Vol. 14, № 1. – P.58-68].
[Bruyčre O, Cavalier E, Buckinx F, Reginster JY. Relevance of vitamin D in the pathogenesis and therapy of frailty. CurrOpinClinNutrMetab Care. 2017;20(1):26–9].
[Szlejf C, Suemoto CK, Janovsky CCPS, Barreto SM, Diniz MFHS, Lotufo PA, Bensenor IM. Thyroid Function and Sarcopenia: Results from the ELSA-Brasil Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Jul;68(7):1545-1553. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16416. Epub 2020 Mar 13. PMID: 32167571].
[Diedhiou D. et al. TSH suppressive therapy accelerates progression of sacropenia in post-menopausal women //Endocrine Abstracts. – Bioscientifica, 2014. – Vol. 35].
[Choi Y. J. et al. Higher free thyroxine levels are associated with sarcopenia in elderly Koreans //Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia. – 2015. – Vol. 1. – №. 2. – P. 127-133].
[Zhou Y. et al. Sarcopenia and relationships between muscle mass, measured glomerular filtration rate and physical function in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3–5 //Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. – 2018. – Vol. 33. – №. 2. – P. 342-348].
[Matsushita K, Mahmoodi BK, Woodward M, Emberson JR, Jafar TH, Jee SH, Polkinghorne KR, Shankar A, Smith DH, Tonelli M, Warnock DG, Wen CP, Coresh J, Gansevoort RT, Hemmelgarn BR, Levey AS; Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium. Comparison of risk prediction using the CKD-EPI equation and the MDRD study equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate. JAMA. 2012 May 9;307(18):1941-51].
[Padala S, Tighiouart H, Inker LA, Contreras G, Beck GJ, Lewis J, Steffes M, Rodby RA, Schmid CH, Levey AS. Accuracy of a GFR estimating equation over time in people with a wide range of kidney function. Am J KidneyDis. 2012 Aug;60(2):217-24].
[Bohannon RW (2017) Test-retest reliability of measurements of hand-grip strength obtained by dynamometry from older adults: a systematic review of research in the PubMed database. J frailty aging 6:83–87. https://doi.org/10.14283/jfa.2017.8 19].
[Zanker J. et al. Consensus guidelines for sarcopenia prevention, diagnosis and management in Australia and New Zealand //Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. – 2023. – Vol. 14. – №. 1. – P. 142-156].
[Chen L. K. et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment //Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. – 2020. – Vol. 21. – №. 3. – P. 300-307. e2].
[Jones CJ, Rikli RE, Beam WC. A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 1999; 70: 113–9].
[Maggio M, Ceda GP, Ticinesi A et al. Instrumental and noninstrumental evaluation of 4-meter walking speed in older individuals. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0153583].
[Rydwik E, Bergland A, Forsen L et al. Investigation into the reliability and validity of the measurement of elderly people’s clinical walking speed: a systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract 2012; 28: 238–56].
[Zhang M, Xu S, Zong H, Wang J, Chu Y, Cai J, Chang L. Effect of sarcopenia and poor balance on vertebral spinal osteoporotic fracture in female rheumatoid arthritis. Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 8;12(1):9477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13339-2. PMID: 35676311; PMCID: PMC9177606].
[Hull H, He Q, Thornton J et al. iDXA, Prodigy, and DPXL dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry whole-body scans: a cross calibration study. J Clin Densitom 2009].
[Kim KM, Jang HC, Lim S. Differences among skeletal muscle mass indices derived from height-, weight-, and body mass index-adjusted models in assessing sarcopenia. Korean J Intern Med 2016; 31: 643–50].
[Dent E. et al. International clinical practice guidelines for sarcopenia (ICFSR): screening, diagnosis and management //The journal of nutrition, health & aging. – 2018. – Vol. 22. – P. 1148-1161].
[Schweighofer N, Colantonio C, Haudum CW, Hutz B, Kolesnik E, Mursic I, Pilz S, Schmidt A, Stadlbauer V, Zirlik A, Pieber TR, Verheyen N, Obermayer-Pietsch B. DXA-Derived Indices in the Characterisation of Sarcopenia. Nutrients. 2021 Dec 31;14(1):186. doi: 10.3390/nu14010186. PMID: 35011061; PMCID: PMC8747660].
[Gonzalez MC, Barbosa-Silva TG, Heymsfield SB. Bioelectrical impedance analysis in the assessment of sarcopenia. Curr Opin Clin NutrMetab Care 2018;21:366-374; doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000496].
[Wang H, Hai S, Cao L, Zhou J, Liu P, Dong B-R. Estimation of prevalence of sarcopenia by using a new bioelectrical impedance analysis in Chinese community-dwelling elderly people. BMC Geriatr2016;16:216; doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0386-z].
[Tanaka T, Takahashi K, Akishita M, Iijima K. Can bioelectrical impedance analysis using a home-use device properly estimate sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults? GeriatrGerontol Int 2018;18:1579–1580; doi: 10.1111/ggi.13538].
[Li L, Xia Z, Zeng X, Tang A, Wang L, Su Y. The agreement of different techniques for muscle measurement in diagnosing sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Mar 15;14(3):2177-2192. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-1089. Epub 2024 Mar 7. PMID: 38545058; PMCID: PMC10963824].
Chamorro-Moriana G, Moreno AJ, Sevillano JL. Technology-Based Feedback and Its Efficacy in Improving Gait Parameters in Patients with Abnormal Gait: A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2018.18(1):142.
Schofield P, Smith BH, Martin D, et al. Systematically searching for and assessing the literature for self-management of chronic pain: a lay users' perspective. BMC Geriatr. 2014.14:86.
Orellano-Colón EM, Morales FM, Sotelo Z, et al. Development of an assistive technology intervention for community older adults. PhysOccupTherGeriatr. 2017.35(2):49–66.
Li L, He Y, Jin N, Li H, Liu X. Effects of protein supplementation and exercise on delaying sarcopenia in healthy older individuals in Asian and non-Asian countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Food Chem X. 2022 Jan 20;13:100210. doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100210.
Cuyul-Vásquez, I.; Pezo-Navarrete, J.; Vargas-Arriagada, C.; Ortega-Díaz, C.; Sepúlveda-Loyola, W.; Hirabara, S.M.; Marzuca-Nassr, G.N. Effectiveness of Whey Protein Supplementation during Resistance Exercise Training on Skeletal Muscle Mass and Strength in Older People with Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3424. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15153424
Ming-Lin Li, Fei Zhang, Han-Yong Luo, Zi-Wei Quan, Yi-Fei Wang, Le-Tian Huang, Jia-He Wang. Improving sarcopenia in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of whey protein supplementation with or without resistance training. The Journal of nutrition, health and aging. 2024. Volume 28, Issue 4. Р. 100184
Cermak NM, Res PT, de Groot LC, et al. Protein supplementation augments the adaptive response of skeletal muscle to resistance-type exercise training:a meta-analysis. AmJClinNutr. 2012;96(6):1454–64. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.037556.
Liao CD, Tsao JY, Wu YT, et al. Effects of protein supplementation combined with resistance exercise on body composition and physical function in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. AmJClinNutr. 2017;106:1078–91129.
Beckwée D, Delaere A, [Aelbrecht S, et al. Exercise interventions for the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia. A systematic umbrella review. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019; 23(6):494–502.
Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Sen A, Gordon PM. Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2010;9(3):226–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2010.03.004.
Peterson MD, Sen A, Gordon PM. Influence of resistance exercise on lean body mass in aging adults: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(2): 249–58. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181eb6265.
Yoshimura Y, Wakabayashi H, Yamada M, Kim H, Harada A, Arai H. Interventions for Treating Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies // Journal of the American Medical Directors Association., 18 (6) (2017), p. 553.
World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020. Available from: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK566045/. Accessed 22 Feb 20294 2021
Verdijk L. B., Gleeson B. G., Jonkers R. A. M. et al. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy following resistance training is accompanied by a fiber type – specific increase in satellite cell content in elderly men. J. Gerontol. A: Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2009. Vol. 64, №3, Р. 332–339.
Nicklas B. J., Brinkley T.E. Exercise training as a treatment for chronic inflammation in the elderly// Exerc. Sport. Sci. Rev. 2009. Vol 37, №4. P. 165–170
Ogawa K. et al. Resistance exercise training-induced muscle hypertrophy was associated with reduction of inflammatory markers in elderly women //Mediators of inflammation. 2010. Vol. 2010
Calvani, R.; Miccheli, A.; Landi, F.; Bossola, M.; Cesari, M.L.C.; Sieber, C.C.; Bernabei, R.M.E. Novel Insights on Intake of Meat and Prevention of Sarcopenia: All Reasons for an Adequate Consumption. J. Frailty Aging 2013, 2, 2136–2143.
GranicA, DismoreL, HurstC, RobinsonSM, SayerAA. Myoprotective Whole Foods, Muscle Health and Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review of Observational and Intervention Studies in Older Adults. Nutrients. 2020;12:2257; doi:10.3390/nu1208225702
Deutz, N.E.P.; Bauer, J.M.; Barazzoni, R.; Biolo, G.; Boirie, Y.; Bosy-Westphal, A.; Cederholm, T.; Cruz-Jentoft, A.; Krznariç, Z.; Nair, K.S.; et al. Protein intake and exercise for optimal muscle function with aging: Recommendations from the ESPEN Expert Group. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 33, 929–936,
Moore DR, Churchward-Venne TA, Witard O, Breen L, Burd NA, Tipton KD,et al. Protein ingestion to stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis requires greater relative protein intakes in healthy older versus younger men. JGerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70(1):57–62.https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glu103
Morris S, Cater JD, Green MA, Johnstone AM, Brunstrom JM, Stevenson EJ, Williams EA, Corfe BM. Inadequacy of Protein Intake in Older UK Adults. Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 Feb 12;5(1):6. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics5010006. PMID: 32059533; PMCID: PMC7151458.
Johnson, N.R.; Kotarsky, C.J.; Mahoney, S.J.; Sawyer, B.C.; Stone, K.A.; Byun, W.; Hackney, K.J.; Mitchell, S.; Stastny, S.N. Evenness of Dietary Protein Intake Is Positively Associated with Lean Mass and Strength in Healthy Women. Nutr. Metab. Insights 2022, 15, 11786388221101829.
Marshall, R.N.; Smeuninx, B.; Morgan, P.T.; Breen, L. Nutritional Strategies to Offset Disuse-Induced Skeletal Muscle Atrophy and Anabolic Resistance in Older Adults: From Whole-Foods to Isolated Ingredients. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1533.
Witard, O.C.; Jackman, S.R.; Breen, L.; Smith, K.; Selby, A.; Tipton, K.D. Myofibrillar muscle protein synthesis rates subsequent to a meal in response to increasing doses of whey protein at rest and after resistance exercise. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 99, 86–95.
Yang, Y.; Breen, L.; Burd, N.A.; Hector, A.J.; Churchward-Venne, T.A.; Josse, A.R.; Tarnopolsky, M.A.; Phillips, S.M. Resistance exercise enhances myofibrillar protein synthesis with graded intakes of whey protein in older men. Br. J. Nutr. 2012, 108, 1780–1788.
Lozupone M, Panza F, Piccininni M, et al. Social Dysfunction in Older Age and Relationships with Cognition, Depression, and Apathy: The GreatAGE Study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018.
Chipps J, Jarvis MA, Ramlall S. The effectiveness of e-Interventions on reducing social isolation in older persons: A systematic review of systematic reviews. JTelemedTelecare. 2017.23(10):817-827.
Kokura Y, Wakabayashi H, Maeda K, et al. Impact of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation nutrition team on evaluating sarcopenia, cachexia and practice of rehabilitation nutrition. JMedInvestig. 2017;64:140–5
Tieland M, Trouwborst I, Clark BC. Skeletal muscle performance and ageing. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018 Feb;9(1):3-19. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12238. Epub 2017 Nov 19. PMID: 29151281; PMCID: PMC5803609.
Ali S, Garcia JM. Sarcopenia, cachexia and aging: diagnosis, mechanisms and therapeutic options – a mini-review. Gerontology. 2014.60(4):294–305.
Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ et al. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012.9.
Turner S, Arthur G, Lyons RA et al. Modification of the home environment for the reduction of injuries. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2011. (2).
Cumming RG, Thomas M, Szonyi G et al. Home visits by an occupational therapist for assessment and modification of environmental hazards: a randomized trial of falls prevention. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1999. 47 (12): 1397–1402.
VenugopalY. etal. Maintenance vitamin D3 dosage requirements in Chinese women with post menopausal osteoporosis living in the tropics // Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017. Vol. 26, No 3. P. 412–420.
Fassio A. et al. Pharmacokinetics of oral cholecalciferol in healthy subjects with vitamin D deficiency: A randomized open-label study // Nutrients. 2020. Vol. 12, No 6. P. 1–12.
Beaudart C, Buckinx F, Rabenda V, et al. The effects of vitamin D on skeletal muscle strength, muscle mass, and muscle power: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(11):4336-4345. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-1742
Antoniak A. E., Greig C. A. The effect of combined resistance exercise training and vitamin D3 supplementation on musculoskeletal health and function in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2017;7:e014619. doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2016-014619
Thanapluetiwong S, Chewcharat A, Takkavatakarn K, Praditpornsilpa K, Eiam-Ong S, Susantitaphong P. Vitamin D supplement on prevention of fall and fracture: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(34):e21506. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000021506
Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, Simpson JA, Kotowicz MA, Young D, Nicholson GC. Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2010;303(18):1815–1822
Bauer JM, Verlaan S, Bautmans I, Brandt K, Donini LM, Maggio M, McMurdo ME, Mets T, Seal C, Wijers SL, Ceda GP, De Vito G, Donders G, Drey M, Greig C, Holmbäck U, Narici M, McPhee J, Poggiogalle E, Power D, Scafoglieri A, Schultz R, Sieber CC, Cederholm T. Effects of a vitamin D and leucine-enriched whey protein nutritional supplement on measures of sarcopenia in older adults, the PROVIDE study: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Sep 1;16(9):740-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.05.021. Epub 2015 Jul 10. PMID: 26170041.
Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Staehelin HB, Orav JE, Stuck AE, Theiler R, Wong JB, Egli A, Kiel DP, Henschkowski J. Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2009;339:b3692
M. H. Murad, K. B. Elamin, N. O. A.Elnour et al. The Effect of Vitamin D on Falls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J ClinEndocrinolMetab, October 2011, 96(10):2997–3006]
Yao P, Bennett D, Mafham M, Lin X, Chen Z, Armitage J, Clarke R. Vitamin D and Calcium for the Prevention of Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917789. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17789.
Nasimi N, Sohrabi Z, Nunes EA, Sadeghi E, Jamshidi S, Gholami Z, Akbarzadeh M, Faghih S, Akhlaghi M, Phillips SM. Whey Protein Supplementation with or without Vitamin D on Sarcopenia-Related Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Adv Nutr. 2023 Jul;14(4):762-773. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.05.011.
Giustina, A., Bouillon, R., Dawson-Hughes, B. et al. Vitamin D in the older population: a consensus statement. Endocrine 79, 31–44 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-022-03208-3
Dawson-Hughes B, Wang J, Barger K, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Sempos CT, Durazo-Arvizu RA, Ceglia L. Intra-trial Mean 25(OH)D and PTH Levels and Risk of Falling in Older Men and Women in the Boston STOP IT Trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2022 Apr 19;107(5):e1932-e1937. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac012.
Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Orav EJ, Staehelin HB, Meyer OW, Theiler R, Dick W, Willett WC, Egli A. Monthly high-dose vitamin D treatment for the prevention of functional decline: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(2):175–183
Michos ED, Kalyani RR, Blackford AL, Sternberg AL, Mitchell CM, Juraschek SP, Schrack JA, Wanigatunga AA, Roth DL, Christenson RH, Miller ER 3rd, Appel LJ. The Relationship of Falls With Achieved 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels From Vitamin D Supplementation: The STURDY Trial. J Endocr Soc. 2022 Apr 16;6(6):bvac065. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvac065.
Smith LM, Gallagher JC, Suiter C. Medium doses of daily vitamin D decrease falls and higher doses of daily vitamin D3 increase falls: A randomized clinical trial. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2017 Oct;173:317-322. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.03.015.
Myung SK, Cho H. Effects of intermittent or single high-dose vitamin D supplementation on risk of falls and fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2023 Aug;34(8):1355-1367. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06761-3.
Kong SH, Jang HN, Kim JH, Kim SW, Shin CS. Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Risk of Fractures and Falls According to Dosage and Interval: A Meta-Analysis. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2022 Apr;37(2):344-358. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2021.1374]
DeOliveiraL.F. etal. Obesity and overweight decreases the effect of vitamin D supplementation in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials // Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2020. Vol. 21, No 1. P. 67–76.
Perna S. The enigma of vitamin D supplementation in aging with obesity. Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino). 2022 Dec;68(4):459-462. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5985.21.02955-7
István GT. Vitamin D – Too Little, or Too Much in the Elderly and the Obese?.2020 - 2(4) OAJBS.ID.000190. DOI: 10.38125/OAJBS.000190
KrishnamoorthyG. etal. Early predisposition to osteomalacia in Indian adults on phenytoin or valproate monotherapy and effective prophylaxis by simultaneous supplementation with calcium and 25-hydroxy vitamin D at recommended daily allowance dosage: A prospective study // Neurol. India. 2010. Vol. 58, No 2. P. 213–219
Kupisz-Urbańska M, Płudowski P, Marcinowska-Suchowierska E. Vitamin D Deficiency in Older Patients-Problems of Sarcopenia, Drug Interactions, Management in Deficiency. Nutrients. 2021 Apr 10;13(4):1247. doi: 10.3390/nu13041247
Zoe E. Davidson, Karen Z. Walker, Helen Truby, Do Glucocorticosteroids Alter Vitamin D Status? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Volume 97, Issue 3, 1 March 2012, Pages 738–744, https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-2757
Christodoulou, M., Aspray, T. J., &Schoenmakers, I. (2021). Vitamin D Supplementation for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses of Trials Investigating the Response to Supplementation and an Overview of Guidelines. Calcified tissue international, 109(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00844-1
M. G. Vervloet, S. Hsu, I. H. de Boer. Vitamin D supplementation in people with chronic kidney disease. KidneyInternational. 2023. Volume 104, Issue 4. Pages 698-706
PilzS. etal. Vitamin D status and mortality risk in CKD: A meta-analysis of prospective studies // Am. J. Kidney Dis. Elsevier Inc., 2011. Vol. 58, No 3. P. 374– 382
Xu C. et al. Evaluation of responses to vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) in patients on dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis // J. Investig. Med. 2016. Vol. 64, No 5. P. 1050– 1059
Chang MC, Choo YJ. Effects of Whey Protein, Leucine, and Vitamin D Supplementation in Patients with Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2023 Jan 19;15(3):521. doi: 10.3390/nu15030521.
Gkekas N.K., Anagnostis P., Paraschou V., Stamiris D., Dellis S., Kenanidis E., Potoupnis M., Tsiridis E., Goulis D.G. The effect of vitamin D plus protein supplementation on sarcopenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Maturitas. 2021;145:56–63. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2021.01.002
Rolland Y, Dray C, Vellas B, Barreto PS. Current and investigational medications for the treatment of sarcopenia. Metabolism. 2023 Dec;149:155597. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155597.
Caulfield L, Heslop P, Walesby KE, Sumukadas D, Sayer AA, Witham MD. Effect of Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Physical Performance in Older People - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jun;22(6):1215-1221.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.07.012.
LACE study group, Achison M, Adamson S, Akpan A, Aspray T, Avenell A, et al. Effect of perindopril or leucine on physical performance in older people with sarcopenia: the LACE randomized controlled trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2022;13:858–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcsm.12934.
Pahor, M., Anton, S. D., Beavers, D. P., Cauley, J. A., Fielding, R. A., Kritchevsky, S. B., Leeuwenburgh, C., Lewis, K. H., Liu, C. K., Lovato, L. C., Lu, J., Manini, T. M., McDermott, M. M., Miller, M. E., Newman, A. B., Radziszewska, B., Stowe, C. L., Tracy, R. P., Walkup, M. P., Wu, S. S., … Ambrosius, W. T. (2019). Effect of Losartan and Fish Oil on Plasma IL-6 and Mobility in Older Persons. The ENRGISE Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 74(10), 1612–1619. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly277
Sjúrðarson T, Bejder J, Breenfeldt Andersen A, Bonne T, Kyhl K, Róin T, Patursson P, OddmarsdóttirGregersen N, Skoradal MB, Schliemann M, Lindegaard M, Weihe P, Mohr M, Nordsborg NB. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on cardiovascular adaptation to exercise training. Physiol Rep. 2022 Jul;10(13):e15382. doi: 10.14814/phy2.15382
Correa C, Bieger P, Perry IS, Souza GC. Testosterone Supplementation on Sarcopenia Components in Chronic Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Pharm Des. 2022;28(7):586-594. doi: 10.2174/1381612827666211115155541
S. M. Parahiba, É. C. T. Ribeiro, C. Corrêa, P. Bieger, I.S. Perry, G. C. Souza. Effect of testosterone supplementation on sarcopenic components in middle-aged and elderly men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Experimental Gerontology. 2020. Volume 142. Р. 111106
Kenny AM, Boxer RS, Kleppinger A, Brindisi J, Feinn R, Burleson JA. Dehydroepiandrosterone combined with exercise improves muscle strength and physical function in frail older women. J Am GeriatrSoc2010;58:1707–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03019.x
Snyder PJ, Bhasin S, Cunningham GR, Matsumoto AM, Stephens-Shields AJ, Cauley JA, Gill TM, Barrett-Connor E, Swerdloff RS, Wang C, Ensrud KE, Lewis CE, Farrar JT, Cella D, Rosen RC, Pahor M, Crandall JP, Molitch ME, Cifelli D, Dougar D, Fluharty L, Resnick SM, Storer TW, Anton S, Basaria S, Diem SJ, Hou X, Mohler ER 3rd, Parsons JK, Wenger NK, Zeldow B, Landis JR, Ellenberg SS; Testosterone Trials Investigators. Effects of Testosterone Treatment in Older Men. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 18;374(7):611-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506119.
Basaria S, Coviello AD, Travison TG, Storer TW, Farwell WR, Jette AM, et al. Adverse events associated with testosterone administration. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:109–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1000485
Finkle WD, Greenland S, Ridgeway GK, Adams JL, Frasco MA, Cook MB, et al. Increased risk of non-fatal myocardial infarction following testosterone therapy prescription in men. PLoSOne 2014;9:e85805. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0085805
Dalton JT, Barnette KG, Bohl CE, Hancock ML, Rodriguez D, Dodson ST, et al. The selective androgen receptor modulator GTx-024 (enobosarm) improves lean body mass and physical function in healthy elderly men and postmenopausal women: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2011;2:153–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13539-011-0034-6
Crawford J, Prado CMM, Johnston MA, Gralla RJ, Taylor RP, Hancock ML, et al. Study design and rationale for the phase 3 clinical development program of Enobosarm, a selective androgen receptor modulator, for the prevention and treatment of muscle wasting in Cancer patients (POWER trials). Curr Oncol Rep 2016;18:37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-016-0522-0
Javed AA, Mayhew AJ, Shea AK, Raina P. Association between hormone therapy and muscle mass in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and Metaanalysis. JAMA Netw Open 2019;2:e1910154. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jamanetworkopen.2019.10154
Xu Y, Deng K-L, Xing T-F, Mei Y-Q, Xiao S-M. Effect of hormone therapy on muscle strength in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Menopause 2020;27:827–35. https:// doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001538
Greising SM, Baltgalvis KA, Lowe DA, Warren GL. Hormone therapy and skeletal muscle strength: a meta-analysis. J GerontolABiolSci Med Sci. 2009 Oct;64(10):1071-81. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp082]
Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence. Lancet. 2019 Sep 28;394(10204):1159-1168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31709-X.
Rubeck KZ, Bertelsen S, Vestergaard P, Jørgensen JOL. Impact of GH substitution on exercise capacity and muscle strength in GH-deficient adults: a meta-analysis of blinded, placebo-controlled trials. ClinEndocrinol2009;71:860–6. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03592.x.
Widdowson WM, Gibney J. The effect of growth hormone (GH) replacement on muscle strength in patients with GH-deficiency: a meta-analysis. ClinEndocrinol2010;72:787–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2009.03716.x.
Taaffe DR, Pruitt L, Reim J, Hintz RL, Butterfield G, Hoffman AR, et al. Effect of recombinant human growth hormone on the muscle strength response to resistance exercise in elderly men. J ClinEndocrinolMetab1994;79:1361–6. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.79.5.7525633.
Hermansen K, Bengtsen M, Kjær M, Vestergaard P, Jørgensen JOL. Impact of GH administration on athletic performance in healthy young adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Growth Hormon IGF Res 2017;34:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ghir.2017.05.005.
Liu H, Bravata DM, Olkin I, Nayak S, Roberts B, Garber AM, et al. Systematic review: the safety and efficacy of growth hormone in the healthy elderly. AnnInternMed2007;146:104–15. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-2- 200701160-00005.
Ekinci O, Yanik S, TerziogluBebitoglu B, et al. Effect of calcium betahydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (CaHMB), vitamin D, and protein supplementation on postoperative immobilization in malnourished older adult patients with hip fracture: a randomized controlled study. NutrClinPract. 2016;31(6):829–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884533616629628.
Oktaviana J, Zanker J, Vogrin S, Duque G. The Effect of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) on sarcopenia and functional frailty in older persons: A systematic review. J. Nutr. Health Aging. 2019;23:145–150. doi: 10.1007/s12603-018-1153-y.
Stout JR, Smith-Ryan AE, Fukuda DH, Kendall KL, Moon JR, Hoffman JR, et al. Effect of calcium beta-hydroxy-betamethylbutyrate (CaHMB) with and without resistance training in men and women 65+yrs: a randomized, double-blind pilot trial. Exp. Gerontol. 2013;48:1303–1310. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.08.007
Martinez-Arnau FM, Fonfria-Vivas R, Cauli O. Beneficial effects of leucine supplementation on criteria for sarcopenia: A systematic review. Nutrients. 2019;11:2504. doi: 10.3390/nu11102504
Bouillanne O, Melchior JC, Faure C, Paul M, Canoui-Poitrine F, Boirie Y, et al. Impact of 3-week citrulline supplementation on postprandial protein metabolism in malnourished older patients: the ciproage randomized controlled trial. Clin. Nutr. 2019;38:564–574. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.02.017
Ellis AC, Hunter GR, Goss AM, Gower BA. Oral Supplementation with beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate, arginine, and glutamine improves lean body mass in healthy older adults. J. Diet Suppl. 2019;16:281–293. doi: 10.1080/19390211.2018.1454568
Walrand S. Ornithine alpha-ketoglutarate: could it be a new therapeutic option for sarcopenia? J Nutr Health Aging. 2010 Aug;14(7):570-7. doi: 10.1007/s12603-010-0109-7. PMID: 20818473.
Butterworth, R.F. L-Ornithine L-Aspartate for the Treatment of Sarcopenia in Chronic Liver Disease: The Taming of a Vicious Cycle. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 2019, 8182195.
Gromova O. A. et al. Molecular mechanisms of the myoprotective action of chondroitin sulfate and glucosamine sulfate in sarcopenia // Neurology, Neuropsychiatry, Psychosomatics. – 2019. – Vol. 11. – №. 1. – P. 117-124.
Sarcopenia in older adults. Curr AD, Hurezeanu R. Sarcopenia. [Updated 2023 Jul 4]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560813/].
Balogun S, Winzenberg T, Wills K, Scott D, Jones G, Aitken D, Callisaya ML. Prospective Associations of Low Muscle Mass and Function with 10-Year Falls Risk, Incident Fracture and Mortality in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2017;21(7):843-848. doi: 10.1007/s12603-016-0843-6. PMID: 28717816. 6.
Walston JD. Sarcopenia in older adults. Curr OpinRheumatol. 2012 Nov;24(6):623-7. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0b013e328358d59b. PMID: 22955023; PMCID: PMC4066461.
Yu SC, Khow KS, Jadczak AD, Visvanathan R. Clinical Screening Tools for Sarcopenia and Its Management. Curr GerontolGeriatr Res. 2016;2016:5978523. doi: 10.1155/2016/5978523. Epub 2016 Feb 4. PMID: 26966433; PMCID: PMC4757731.
Sayer AA, Syddall H, Martin H, Patel H, Baylis D, Cooper C. The developmental origins of sarcopenia. J Nutr Health Aging. 2008 Aug-Sep;12(7):427-32. doi: 10.1007/BF02982703. PMID: 18615224; PMCID: PMC2652119.
Kuznetsov K. D., Marchenkova L. A. Secondary sarcopenia in patients with motor disorders: prevalence, diagnosis, and medical rehabilitation. Literature review. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2024; 23(4):92-100. https://doi.org/10.38025/2078-1962-2024-23-4-92-100.
Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Bahyah KS, Chou MY, Chen LY, Hsu PS, Krairit O, Lee JS, Lee WJ, Lee Y, Liang CK, Limpawattana P, Lin CS, Peng LN, Satake S, Suzuki T, Won CW, Wu CH, Wu SN, Zhang T, Zeng P, Akishita M, Arai H. Sarcopenia in Asia: consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Feb;15(2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.11.025. PMID: 24461239.
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, Boirie Y, Cederholm T, Landi F, Martin FC, Michel JP, Rolland Y, Schneider SM, Topinková E, Vandewoude M, Zamboni M; European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age Ageing. 2010 Jul;39(4):412-23. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afq034. Epub 2010 Apr 13. PMID: 20392703; PMCID: PMC2886201.
Lourenço RA, Pérez-Zepeda M, Gutiérrez-Robledo L, García-García FJ, Rodríguez Mañas L. Performance of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People algorithm in screening older adults for muscle mass assessment. Age Ageing. 2015 Mar;44(2):334-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu192. Epub 2014 Dec 23. PMID: 25539836.
Ryall JG, Schertzer JD, Lynch GS. Cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying age-related skeletal muscle wasting and weakness. Biogerontology. 2008 Aug;9(4):213-28. doi: 10.1007/s10522-008-9131-0. Epub 2008 Feb 26. PMID: 18299960.
Dhillon RJ, Hasni S. Pathogenesis and Management of Sarcopenia. Clin Geriatr Med. 2017 Feb;33(1):17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2016.08.002. PMID: 27886695; PMCID: PMC5127276.
Alcazar J, Aagaard P, Haddock B, Kamper RS, Hansen SK, Prescott E, Alegre LM, Frandsen U, Suetta C. Age- and Sex-Specific Changes in Lower-Limb Muscle Power Throughout the Lifespan. J GerontolA Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020 Jun 18;75(7):1369-1378. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaa013. PMID: 31943003.
Picorelli AM, Pereira LS, Pereira DS, Felício D, Sherrington C. Adherence to exercise programs for older people is influenced by program characteristics and personal factors: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2014 Sep;60(3):151-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2014.06.012. Epub 2014 Aug 3. PMID: 25092418.
Newman AB, Simonsick EM, Naydeck BL, Boudreau RM, Kritchevsky SB, Nevitt MC, Pahor M, Satterfield S, Brach JS, Studenski SA, Harris TB. Association of long-distance corridor walk performance with mortality, cardiovascular disease, mobility limitation, and disability. JAMA. 2006 May 3;295(17):2018-26. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.17.2018. PMID: 16670410.
Law TD, Clark LA, Clark BC. Resistance Exercise to Prevent and Manage Sarcopenia and Dynapenia. Annu Rev GerontolGeriatr. 2016;36(1):205-228. doi: 10.1891/0198-8794.36.205. PMID: 27134329; PMCID: PMC4849483.
von Haehling S, Morley JE, Anker SD. An overview of sarcopenia: facts and Pathogenesis and Management impact. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2010 Dec;1(2):129-133. doi: 10.1007/s13539-010-0014-2. Epub 2010 Dec 17. PMID: 21475695; PMCID: PMC3060646.
Borde R, Hortobágyi T, Granacher U. Dose-Response Relationships of Resistance Training in Healthy Old Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2015 Dec;45(12):1693-720. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0385-9. PMID: 26420238; PMCID: PMC4656698.
Manini TM, Clark BC, Tracy BL, Burke J, Ploutz-Snyder L. Resistance and functional training reduces knee extensor position fluctuations in functionally limited older adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2005 Dec;95(5-6):436-46. doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-0048-x. Epub 2005 Sep 29. PMID: 16193338.
Ramirez-Campillo R, Alvarez C, Garcìa-Hermoso A, Celis-Morales C, Ramirez-Velez R, Gentil P, Izquierdo M. High-speed resistance training in elderly women: Effects of cluster training sets on functional performance and quality of life. Exp Gerontol. 2018 Sep;110:216-222. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.06.014. Epub 2018 Jun 15. Erratum in: Exp Gerontol. 2019 Jun;120:113. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2019.02.009. PMID: 29909049.
Lazarus NR, Izquierdo M, Higginson IJ, Harridge SDR. Exercise Deficiency Diseases of Ageing: The Primacy of Exercise and Muscle Strengthening as First-Line Therapeutic Agents to Combat Frailty. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Sep;19(9):741-743. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.04.014. PMID: 30149843.
Marchenkova L. A., Vasilyeva V. A., Otvetchikova D. I., Fesyun A. D. Efficacy of virtual reality technologies and mechanotherapy in the rehabilitation of patients after surgical treatment of femoral fracture associated with osteoporosis. Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine. 2024;(4):270-280. https://doi.org/10.37586/2686-8636-4-2024-270-280.
Kim HK, Suzuki T, Saito K, Yoshida H, Kobayashi H, Kato H, Katayama M. Effects of exercise and amino acid supplementation on body composition and physical function in community-dwelling elderly Japanese sarcopenic women: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Jan;60(1):16-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03776.x.Epub 2011 Dec 5. Erratum in: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Mar;60(3):605. PMID: 22142410.
Binder EF, Yarasheski KE, Steger-May K, Sinacore DR, Brown M, Schechtman KB, Holloszy JO. Effects of progressive resistance training on body composition in frail older adults: results of a randomized, controlled trial. J GerontolA Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Nov;60(11):1425-31. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.11.1425. PMID: 16339329.
Shen Y, Shi Q, Nong K, Li S, Yue J, Huang J, Dong B, Beauchamp M, Hao Q. Exercise for sarcopenia in older people: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023 Jun;14(3):1199-1211. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13225. Epub 2023 Apr 14. PMID: 37057640; PMCID: PMC10235889.
Lizama-Pérez R, Chirosa-Ríos LJ, Contreras-Díaz G, Jerez-Mayorga D, Jiménez-Lupión D, Chirosa-Ríos IJ. Effect of sit-to-stand-based training on muscle quality in sedentary adults: a randomized controlled trial. PeerJ. 2023 Jul 12;11:e15665. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15665. PMID: 37456889; PMCID: PMC10349562.
Valenzuela PL, Morales JS, Pareja-Galeano H, Izquierdo M, Emanuele E, de la Villa P, Lucia A. Physical strategies to prevent disuse-induced functional decline in the elderly. Ageing Res Rev. 2018 Nov;47:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 18. PMID: 30031068.
de Souto Barreto P, Morley JE, Chodzko-Zajko W, H Pitkala K, Weening-Djiksterhuis E, Rodriguez-Mañas L, Barbagallo M, Rosendahl E, Sinclair A, Landi F, Izquierdo M, Vellas B, Rolland Y; International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics – Global Aging Research Network (IAGG-GARN) and the IAGG European Region Clinical Section. Recommendations on Physical Activity and Exercise for Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Taskforce Report. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 May 1;17(5):381-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.01.021. Epub 2016 Mar 21. PMID: 27012368.
Kamen G, Knight CA. Training-related adaptations in motor unit discharge rate in young and older adults. J GerontolA Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004 Dec;59(12):1334-8. doi: 10.1093/gerona/59.12.1334. PMID: 15699535.
Chalé A, Cloutier GJ, Hau C, Phillips EM, Dallal GE, Fielding RA. Efficacy of whey protein supplementation on resistance exercise-induced changes in lean mass, muscle strength, and physical function in mobility-limited older adults. J GerontolA Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013 Jun;68(6):682-90. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls221. Epub 2012 Oct 31. PMID: 23114462; PMCID: PMC3708517.
Prado CM, Wells JC, Smith SR, Stephan BC, Siervo M. Sarcopenic obesity: A Critical appraisal of the current evidence. Clin Nutr. 2012 Oct;31(5):583-601. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 17. PMID: 22809635.
Johnson Stoklossa CA, Sharma AM, Forhan M, Siervo M, Padwal RS, Prado CM. Prevalence of Sarcopenic Obesity in Adults with Class II/III Obesity Using Different Diagnostic Criteria. J NutrMetab. 2017;2017:7307618. doi: 10.1155/2017/7307618. Epub 2017 Mar 22. PMID: 28421144; PMCID: PMC5380855.
Kalinkovich A, Livshits G. Sarcopenic obesity or obese sarcopenia: A cross talk between age-associated adipose tissue and skeletal muscle inflammation as a main mechanism of the pathogenesis. Ageing Res Rev. 2017 May;35:200-221. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Oct 1. PMID: 27702700.
Tian S, Xu Y. Association of sarcopenic obesity with the risk of all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. GeriatrGerontol Int. 2016 Feb;16(2):155-66. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12579. Epub 2015 Aug 14. PMID: 26271226.
Ryu M, Jo J, Lee Y, Chung YS, Kim KM, Baek WC. Association of physical activity with sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in community-dwelling older adults: the Fourth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Age Ageing. 2013 Nov;42(6):734-40. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft063. Epub 2013 Jun 11. PMID: 23761456.
Stanciu LE, Iliescu MG, Oprea C, Ionescu EV, Petcu A, Ciortea VM, Petcu LC, Apostol S, Nedelcu AD, Motoașcă I, Irsay L. The Impact of Complex Rehabilitation Treatment on Sarcopenia-Pathology with an Endocrine Morphological Substrate and Musculoskeletal Implications. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 2;59(7):1238. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071238. PMID: 37512050; PMCID: PMC10383638.].
Gupta P, Kumar S. Sarcopenia and Endocrine Ageing: Are They Related? Cureus. 2022 Sep 5;14(9):e28787. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28787. PMID: 36225400; PMCID: PMC9533189.
Fan J, Kou X, Yang Y, Chen N. MicroRNA-Regulated Proinflammatory Cytokines in Sarcopenia. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:1438686. doi: 10.1155/2016/1438686. Epub 2016 Jun 13. PMID: 27382188; PMCID: PMC4921629.
Silva J, Martins J, Nicomédio C, Gonçalves C, Palito C, Gonçalves R, Fernandes PO, Nunes A, Alves MJ. A Novel Approach to Assess Balneotherapy Effects on Musculoskeletal Diseases-An Open Interventional Trial Combining Physiological Indicators, Biomarkers, and Patients' Health Perception. Geriatrics (Basel). 2023 May 16;8(3):55. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics8030055. PMID: 37218835; PMCID: PMC10204501.
Stanciu, L.E.; Pascu, E.I.; Ionescu, E.V.; Circo, E.; Oprea, C.; Iliescu, M.G. Anti-ageing potential of techirghiol mud therapy through the modulation of pituitary- adrenal axis activity. J. Environ. Prot. Ecol. 2017, 18, 728–736.
Raud B, Lanhers C, Crouzet C, Eschalier B, Bougeard F, Goldstein A, Pereira B, Coudeyre E. Identification of Responders to Balneotherapy among Adults over 60 Years of Age with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pilot Study with Trajectory Model Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 8;19(22):14669. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214669. PMID: 36429387; PMCID: PMC9690151.
Makarova E. V., Marchenkova L. A., Eremushkin M. A., Styazhkina E. M., Chesnikova E. I., Razvalyaeva D. V. Efficacy of mechanotherapeutic methods in correcting muscle strength deficit of the deep spinal stabilization system in patients with vertebral fractures associated with osteoporosis. Bulletin of Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020; 96 (2): 33-40. https://doi.org/10.38025/ 2078-1962-2020-96-2-33-40 (Clinical approbation by the Russian Ministry of Health)
Marchenkova L. A., Vasilyeva V. A., Otvetchikova D. I., Fesyun A. D. Efficacy of virtual reality technologies and mechanotherapy in the rehabilitation of patients after surgical treatment of femoral fracture associated with osteoporosis. Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine. 2024;4(20): P. 270-280. DOI: 10.37586/2686-8636-4-2024-270-280 (Clinical approbation by the Russian Ministry of Health)
Shi Y., Stanmore E., McGarrigle L. et al. Development of a community intervention combining social media-based health education plus exercise programme (SHEEP) to improve muscle function among young-old adults with possible sarcopenia: Co-design approach. Maturitas.2024; 186:108027, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108027.
Jadhav P., Kaur J., Joshi S. G. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Awareness Program on Knowledge of Sarcopenia and Its Prevention among the Senior Age Group of Pashan Zone of Pune City. Universal Journal of Public Health. 2023; 11(6): 930-935. DOI: 10.13189/ujph.2023.110617
Shi Y., Stanmore E., McGarrigle L. et al. Development of a community intervention combining social media-based health education plus exercise programme (SHEEP) to improve muscle function among young-old adults with possible sarcopenia: Co-design approach. Maturitas.2024; 186:108027, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108027
Jadhav P., Kaur J., Joshi S. G. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Awareness Program on Knowledge of Sarcopenia and Its Prevention among the Senior Age Group of Pashan Zone of Pune City. Universal Journal of Public Health. 2023; 11(6): 930-935. DOI: 10.13189/ujph.2023.110617
An HJ, Tizaoui K, Terrazzino S, Cargnin S, Lee KH, Nam SW, Kim JS, Yang JW, Lee JY, Smith L, Koyanagi A, Jacob L, Li H, Shin JI, Kronbichler A. Sarcopenia in Autoimmune and Rheumatic Diseases: A Comprehensive Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 7;21(16):5678. doi: 10.3390/ijms21165678. PMID: 32784808; PMCID: PMC7461030
Morley JE, Abbatecola AM, ArgilesJMet al. Sarcopenia with limited mobility: an international consensus. J AmMedDirAssoc 2011; 12: 403–9.
RollandY, Lauwers-CancesV, CournotM, etal. Sarcopenia, calf circumference, and physical function of elderly women: a cross-sectional study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51:1120–4. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51362.x.
Santo RCDE, Baker JF, Santos LPD, Silva MMMD, Xavier RM. Sarcopenia in Immune-Mediated Rheumatic Diseases-Review. JClinRheumatol. 2023 Oct 1;29(7):354-362. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0000000000001913. Epub 2022 Oct 27. PMID: 36322934.
Vaishya R, Misra A, Vaish A, Ursino N, D'Ambrosi R. Hand grip strength as a proposed new vital sign of health: a narrative review of evidences. J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Jan 9;43(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00500-y.
Yoshimura Y, Matsumoto A, Inoue T, Okamura M, Kuzuya M. Protein supplementation alone or combined with exercise for sarcopenia and physical frailty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2025 Apr;131:105783. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2025.105783;
Li ML, Zhang F, Luo HY, Quan ZW, Wang YF, Huang LT, Wang JH. Improving sarcopenia in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of whey protein supplementation with or without resistance training. J Nutr Health Aging. 2024 Apr;28(4):100184. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100184.
ESPEN practical guideline: clinical nutrition and hydration in geriatrics. Clin. Nutr. 2022; 41:958-989
Tan L, He R, Zheng X. Effect of vitamin D, calcium, or combined supplementation on fall prevention: a systematic review and updated network meta-analysis. BMCGeriatr. 2024 May 2;24(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05009-x..
Efficacy of native forms of vitamin D3 in the treatment of sarcopenia in older and elderly adults // Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine. – 2024. – № 3. – P. 193-201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37586/2686-8636-3-2024-193-201
Richy F, Dukas L, Schacht E. Differential Effects of D-Hormone Analogs and Native Vitamin D on the Risk of Falls: A Comparative Meta-Analysis. Calcified Tissue International. 2008;82(2):102-107. doi:10.1007/s00223-008-9102-0.
Xiong A, Li H, Lin M, Xu F, Xia X, Dai D, Sun R, Ling Y, Qiu L, Wang R, Ding Y, Xie Z. Effects of active vitamin D analogues on muscle strength and falls in elderly people: an updated meta-analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 1;15:1327623. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1327623.
Dukas L, Schacht E, Mazor Z, Stähelin HB. Treatment with alfacalcidol in elderly people significantly decreases the high risk of falls associated with a low creatinine clearance of <65 ml/min. Osteoporos Int. 2005 Feb;16(2):198-203. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1671-9. Epub 2004 Jun 17. PMID: 15221207.
Capatina C, Caragheorgheopol A, Berteanu M, Poiana C. Short-term Administration of Alphacalcidol is Associated with More Significant Improvement of Muscular Performance in Women with Vitamin D Deficiency Compared to Native Vitamin D. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2016 Sep;124(8):461-465. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-103932. Epub 2016 May 11.
: Wei N, Pang MY, Ng SS, Ng GY. Optimal frequency/time combination of whole‐body vibration training for improving muscle size and strength of people with age‐related muscle loss (sarcopenia): A randomized controlled trial. Geriatrics & Gerontology International; 2016 [Epub ahead of print]. DOI: 10.1111/ggi.12878
Chang SF, Lin PC, Yang RS, Yang RJ. The preliminary effect of whole-body vibration intervention on improving the skeletal muscle mass index, physical fitness, and quality of life among older people with sarcopenia. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jan 17;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0712-8.
Kern H, Barberi L, Löfler S, Sbardella S, Burggraf S, Fruhmann H, Carraro U, Mosole S, Sarabon N, Vogelauer M, Mayr W, Krenn M, Cvecka J, Romanello V, Pietrangelo L, Protasi F, Sandri M, Zampieri S, Musaro A. Electrical stimulation counteracts muscle decline in seniors. Front Aging Neurosci. 2014 Jul 24;6:189. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00189.
Teschler M, Heimer M, Schmitz B, Kemmler W, Mooren FC. Four weeks of electromyostimulation improves muscle function and strength in sarcopenic patients: a three-arm parallel randomized trial. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021 Aug;12(4):843-854. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12717.
Barberi L, Scicchitano BM, Musaro A. Molecular and cellular mechanisms of muscle aging and sarcopenia and effects of electrical stimulation in seniors. European Journal of Translational Myology. 2015;25(4):5227
Di Pancrazio L, Bellomo RG, Franciotti R, Iodice P, Galati V, et al. Combined rehabilitation program for postural instability in progressive supranuclear palsy. NeuroRehabilitation. 2013;32:855-860
Concha-Cisternas Y, Castro-Piñero J, Vásquez-Muñoz M, Molina-Márquez I, Vásquez-Gómez J, Guzmán-Muñoz E. Effects of Neuromuscular Training on Postural Balance and Physical Performance in Older Women: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2024; 9(4):195. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9040195
Tan TW, Tan HL, Hsu MF, Huang HL, Chung YC. Effect of non-pharmacological interventions on the prevention of sarcopenia in menopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Womens Health. 2023 Nov 14;23(1):606. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02749-7.
Izquierdo M, de Souto Barreto P, Arai H at al. Global consensus on optimal exercise recommendations for enhancing healthy longevity in older adults (ICFSR). J Nutr Health Aging. 2025 Jan;29(1):100401. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2024.100401.
Mo, Y., Zhou, Y., Chan, H. etal. The association between sedentary behaviour and sarcopenia in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMCGeriatr 23, 877 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04489-7
Pillay J, Gaudet LA, Saba S, Vandermeer B, Ashiq AR, Wingert A, Hartling L. Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences. SystRev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3
International Osteoporosis Foundation, Nutrition Guidelines. Available from: https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/healthprofessionals/prevention/nutrition. Accessed 1 April 2024.
Sherrington C, Fairhall NJ, Wallbank GK, Tiedemann A, Michaleff ZA, Howard K, Clemson L, Hopewell S, Lamb SE. Exercise for preventing falls in older people living in the community. CochraneDatabaseSystRev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD012424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012424.pub2
Lisco, G.; Disoteo, O.E.; De Tullio, A.; De Geronimo, V.; Giagulli, V.A.; Monzani, F.; Jirillo, E.; Cozzi, R.; Guastamacchia, E.; De Pergola, G.; et al. Sarcopenia and Diabetes: A Detrimental Liaison of Advancing Age. Nutrients 2024, 16, 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010063
Concha-Cisternas Y, Castro-Piñero J, Vásquez-Muñoz M, Molina-Márquez I, Vásquez-Gómez J, Guzmán-Muñoz E. Effects of Neuromuscular Training on Postural Balance and Physical Performance in Older Women: Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2024; 9(4):195. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk904019
Dodds RM, Granic A, Robinson SM, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia, long-term conditions, and multimorbidity: findings from UK Biobank participants. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11(1):62-68. doi:10.1002/jcsm.12503].
Springer J, Springer JI, Anker SD. Muscle wasting and sarcopenia in heart failure and beyond: update 2017. ESC Heart Fail. 2017 Nov;4(4):492-498. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12237]
Izzo A, Massimino E, Riccardi G, Della Pepa G. A Narrative Review on Sarcopenia in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Prevalence and Associated Factors. Nutrients. 2021;13(1):183. Published 2021 Jan 9. doi:10.3390/nu13010183
Bone AE, Hepgul N, Kon S, Maddocks M. Sarcopenia and frailty in chronic respiratory disease. Chron Respir Dis. 2017 Feb;14(1):85-99. doi: 10.1177/1479972316679664. Epub 2017 Feb 24
Bhanji RA, Narayanan P, Allen AM, Malhi H, Watt KD. Sarcopenia in hiding: The risk and consequence of underestimating muscle dysfunction in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology. 2017 Dec;66(6):2055-2065. doi: 10.1002/hep.29420]
Zhang X, Zhang W, Wang C, Tao W, Dou Q, Yang Y. Sarcopenia as a predictor of hospitalization among older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2018 Aug 22;18(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0878-0
Peng TC, Chen WL, Wu LW, Chang YW, Kao TW. Sarcopenia and cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. ClinNutr. 2020 Sep;39(9):2695-2701. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.12.014.
Beaudart C, Zaaria M, Pasleau F, Reginster J-Y, Bruyère O (2017) Health Outcomes of Sarcopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 12(1): e0169548.
Dalal, M. Elevated serum advanced glycation end products and poor grip strength in older community-dwelling women / M. Dalal, L. Ferrucci, K. Sun, J Beck, L.P. Fried, S.D. Semba // J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. – 2009. –V.64. –P.132-137.
KimT. N. etal. Prevalence and determinant factors of sarcopenia in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Korean Sarcopenic Obesity Study (KSOS) //Diabetes care. 2010. Vol. 33, №. 7. P. 1497-1499.
Andersen, H. Muscle strength in type 2 diabetes / H.Andersen, S.Nielsen, C.E. Mogensen, J. Jakobsen // Diabetes. – 2004. – V. 53(6). P. 1543–1548.
Andersen, J.L. Muscle fiber type adaptation in the elderly human muscle / J.L. Andersen. // Scand J Med Sci Sports. – 2003. V.13. –P. 40–47.
Andersen, H. Isokinetic muscle strength in long-term IDDM patients in relation to diabetic complications / H. Andersen, P.L. Poulsen, C.E. Mogensen, J. Jakobsen // Diabetes. - 1996. – V. 45. – P. 440 - 445.
Patient guidebook ("Physical activity for the prevention of sarcopenia in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Under the general editorship of: Dymochka M.A., Tkacheva O.N., Authors-compilers: Guryeva I.V., Onuchina Yu.S., Zakharova Ya.N. Moscow, 2022, p. 28. UDC [611.018.6 + 364 + 616.379]-053.9).
Bocharova K. A. et al. Sarcopenia in the long-term care system // Modern Problems of Healthcare and Medical Statistics. – 2021. – №. 2. – P. 12-26.
Tkacheva O. N. et al. Modern geriatrics for primary care physicians: Methodological guide. 2nd edition // M.: Prometheus. – 2021.
Milkamanovich V. K. Nursing medical and social care for older and elderly patients with sarcopenia / V. K. Milkamanovich // Medical Knowledge. – 2022. – № 3. – P. 9-17.
Del Valle E., Negri A.L., Fradinger E., Canalis M., Bevione P., Curcelegui M., Bravo M., Puddu M., Marini A., Ryba J., Peri P., Rosa Diez G., Sintado L., Gottlieb E. Weekly high‐dose ergocalciferol to correct vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency in hemodialysis patients: A pilot trial // Hemodialysis International. — 2015. — Vol. 19. — Weekly high‐dose ergocalciferol to correct vitamin.
Mager D.R., Jackson S.T., Hoffmann M.R., Jindal K., Senior P.A. “Vitamin D supplementation and bone health in adults with diabetic nephropathy: the protocol for a randomized controlled trial” // BMC Endocrine Disorders. — 2014. — Vol. 14. — “Vitamin D supplementation and bone health in adults with diabetic nephropathy. — No. 1. — P. 66.
Pigarova E. A., Rozhinskaya L. Y., Belaya Z. E., Dzeranova L. K., Karonova T. L., Ilyin A. V., Melnichenko G. A., Dedov I. I. Russian Association of Endocrinologists clinical guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of vitamin D deficiency in adults. Problems of Endocrinology. 2016;62(4):60-84. https://doi.org/10.14341/probl201662460-84.
Hill LF, Davies M, Taylor CM, Stanbury SW. Treatment of Hypoparathyroidism With 1,25‐ Dihydroxycholecalciferol. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1976;5:s167–73.
An K. et al. Shared decision making in sarcopenia treatment // Frontiers in Public Health. – 2023. – Vol. 11. – P. 1296112.
Iron deficiency anemia. Clinical guidelines, 2024, https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/preview-cr/669_2.
Xu B, Guo Z, Jiang B, Zhang K, Zhu W, Lian X, Xu Y, Zhao Z, Liu L. Factors affecting sarcopenia in older patients with chronic diseases. Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Mar;11(3):972-983. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-201.
Lee DY, Shin S. Sarcopenia and Anemia in Elderly Koreans: A Nationwide Population-Based Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 30;11(17):2428. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11172428
Gao Q, Hu K, Yan C, Zhao B, Mei F, Chen F, Zhao L, Shang Y, Ma Y, Ma B. Associated Factors of Sarcopenia in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutrients. 2021 Nov 27;13(12):4291. doi: 10.3390/nu13124291
Obeagu EI. Iron homeostasis and health: understanding its role beyond blood health - a narrative review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 May 21;87(6):3362-3371. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003100.
Scott J, Yates M, Tanaka T, Ferrucci L, Cameron D, Welch AA. Cross-Sectional Associations between Clinical Biochemistry and Nutritional Biomarkers and Sarcopenic Indices of Skeletal Muscle in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Nutr. 2025 Mar 8:S0022-3166(25)00156-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2025.03.006.
Hamad A, Singh P. Boosting nutritional value: the role of iron fortification in meat and meat products. Biometals. 2025 Apr;38(2):337-355. doi: 10.1007/s10534-024-00659-1.
Holick M.F. et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: An Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011 Vol. 96, № 7 P. 1911–1930.
Yegudina E. D., Kalashnikova O. S. Physical rehabilitation of patients with osteoporosis. Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy, and Exercise Therapy. 2020;97(2):78‑85.
Samoylova Yu. G., Matveeva M. V., Yakimova Ya. L., Samoylov E. Yu., Kudlay D. A., Yakimovich I.Yu. Physical rehabilitation in sarcopenia: modern approaches. (Literature review). Problems of Balneology, Physiotherapy, and Exercise Therapy. 2024;101(3):56‑61.
Naumov A. V., Khovasova N. O., Unkovsky A. V. Osteoarthritis and sarcopenia: prospects for therapy. Russian Journal of Geriatric Medicine. – 2025. – № 3(23). – P. 351-359. – DOI 10.37586/2686-8636-3-2025-351-359.
Naumov A.V., Unkovsky A.V., Khovasova N.O., Fokeev D.K., Kolesnikova A.V. Combination therapy for osteoarthritis pain flares using non-fixed combinations. Terapevticheskii Arkhiv. 2025;97(5):419–426. DOI: 10.26442/00403660.2025.05.203272
Alway SE, McCrory JL, Kearcher K, Vickers A, Frear B, Gilleland DL, Bonner DE, Thomas JM, Donley DA, Lively MW, Mohamed JS. Resveratrol Enhances Exercise-Induced Cellular and Functional Adaptations of Skeletal Muscle in Older Men and Women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017 Nov 9;72(12):1595-1606. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glx089.
Harper SA, Bassler JR, Peramsetty S, Yang Y, Roberts LM, Drummer D, Mankowski RT, Leeuwenburgh C, Ricart K, Patel RP, Bamman MM, Anton SD, Jaeger BC, Buford TW. Resveratrol and exercise combined to treat functional limitations in late life: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Exp Gerontol. 2021 Jan;143:111111. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2020.111111.
Badrasawi M, Shahar S, Zahara AM, Nor Fadilah R, Singh DK. Efficacy of L-carnitine supplementation on frailty status and its biomarkers, nutritional status, and physical and cognitive function among prefrail older adults: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Nov 17;11:1675-1686. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S113287.Tripkovic L. et al. Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Am J Clin Nutr. 2012. Vol. 95, No 6. P. 1357–1364;
Binkley N. et al. Evaluation of ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol dosing, 1,600 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly in older adults // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011. Vol. 96, No 4. P. 981–988.
Tripkovic L. et al. Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Am J Clin Nutr. 2012. Vol. 95, No 6. P. 1357–1364;
Binkley N. et al. Evaluation of ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol dosing, 1,600 IU daily or 50,000 IU monthly in older adults // J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011. Vol. 96, No 4. P. 981–988.
Kerstin Muders et al. Effects of Traumeel (Tr14) on Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage Response in Healthy Subjects: A Double-Blind RCT. Mediators Inflamm. 2016 Jul 5;2016:1693918. doi: 10.1155/2016/1693918
Christian Schneider. Traumeel – an emerging option to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the management of acute musculoskeletal injuries. Int J Gen Med. 2011 Mar 25;4:225–234. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S16709
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Tkacheva O.N. – Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, D.Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Director of the Russian Gerontology Clinical Research Center (Structural Unit), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the Department of Aging Diseases, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, President of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Lila A.M. – Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, D.Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Director of the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology.
Zubareva N.N. – D.Sc. (Economics), Associate Professor, Director of the National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Russian Ministry of Health, President of the National Association of Experts in Health Resort Treatment.
Tтельян В.А. – Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, D.Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Scientific Advisor of the Federal Research Center of Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety, Head of the Department of Food Hygiene and Toxicology at the Institute of Professional Education, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health (Sechenov University), Union of Dietitians, Nutritionists and Food Industry Specialists.
Kotovskaya Yu.V. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Deputy Director for Science, Russian Gerontology Clinical Research Center (Structural Unit), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Runikhina N.K. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Deputy Director for Geriatrics, Russian Gerontology Clinical Research Center (Structural Unit), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor at the Department of Aging Diseases, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Naumov A.V. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Head of the Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Diseases, Russian Gerontology Clinical Research Center (Structural Unit), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor at the Department of Aging Diseases, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Dudinskaya E.N. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Professor at the Department of Aging Diseases, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the Laboratory of Age-Related Metabolic and Endocrine Disorders, Russian Gerontology Clinical Research Center (Structural Unit), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Khovasova N.O. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Professor at the Department of Aging Diseases, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Senior Researcher at the Laboratory of Musculoskeletal Diseases, Russian Gerontology Clinical Research Center (Structural Unit), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Sharashkina N.V. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Associate Professor at the Department of Aging Diseases, Faculty of Continuous Professional Education, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the Laboratory of General Geriatrics, Russian Gerontology Clinical Research Center (Structural Unit), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Safonova Yu.A. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Professor at the E.S. Pushkova Department of Geriatrics, Propaedeutics and Nursing Management, North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Guryeva I.V. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Professor at the Department of Endocrinology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Russian Ministry of Health, Head of the Scientific and Practical Sector for Rehabilitation and Prevention of Disability Caused by Endocrine Pathology, Federal Center for Rehabilitation of the Disabled of the Ministry of Labor of Russia, Moscow, Member of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Starodubova A.V. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Deputy Director for Research and Clinical Work, Federal Research Center of Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety, Professor at the Department of Faculty Therapy, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Professor at the Department of Dietetics and Nutrition, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Union of Dietitians, Nutritionists and Food Industry Specialists.
Onuchina Yu.S. – Ph.D. (Medicine), Assistant Professor at the Department of Aging Diseases, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Researcher at the Laboratory of Age-Related Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, Russian Gerontology Clinical Research Center (Structural Unit), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Machekhina Lyubov Viktorovna – Ph.D. (Medicine), Associate Professor at the Department of Aging Diseases, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health (Pirogov University), Head of the Laboratory of Aging Biomarkers, Russian Gerontology Clinical Research Center (Structural Unit), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Ostapenko V.S. – Ph.D. (Medicine), Head of the Geriatrics Department, Russian Gerontology Clinical Research Center (Structural Unit), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Assistant Professor at the Department of Aging Diseases, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Pirogov University) of the Russian Ministry of Health, Member of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
Apkhanova T.V. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Chief Researcher at the Department of Physiotherapy and Reflexology, National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Member of the National Association of Experts in Health Resort Treatment.
Konchugova T.V. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Professor, Head of the Educational Center, Chief Researcher at the Department of Physiotherapy and Reflexology, National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Member of the National Association of Experts in Health Resort Treatment.
Marchenkova L.A. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Associate Professor, Head of the Research Management Department, Chief Researcher at the Department of Somatic Rehabilitation, Reproductive Health and Active Longevity, National Medical Research Center for Rehabilitation and Balneology of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Member of the National Association of Experts in Health Resort Treatment.
Zotkin E.G. – D.Sc. (Medicine), First Deputy Director of the V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Member of the Association of Rheumatologists of Russia.
Toroptsova N.V. – D.Sc. (Medicine), Head of the Laboratory of Osteoporosis, V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Association of Rheumatologists of Russia".
Taskina Elena Alexandrovna – Ph.D. (Medicine), Head of the Laboratory of Osteoarthritis, V.A. Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology, Member of the All-Russian Public Organization "Association of Rheumatologists of Russia".
All members of the Working Group have confirmed that they have no financial support or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
The clinical guidelines were developed by expert specialists of the Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians.
This version of the clinical guidelines is based on the following resources and documents:
- Makris UE, Abrams RC, Gurland B, Reid MC. Management of persistent pain in the older patient: a clinical review. JAMA. 2014;312(8):825–836. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.9405
- The International Association for the Study of Pain, https://www.iasp-pain.org/GlobalYear/PaininOlderPersons
- P. Schofield. The Assessment of Pain in Older People: UK National Guidelines, Age and Ageing, Volume 47, Issue suppl_1, March 2018, Pages i1–i22, https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afx192
- Abdulla A, Adams N, Bone M et al. Guidance on the management of pain in older people. Age and ageing 2013; 42: i1–i57. March 2013.
- Hadjistavropoulos T, Herr K, Turk DC, Fine PG, Dworkin RH, Helme R, et al. An interdisciplinary expert consensus statement on assessment of pain in older persons. Clin J Pain 2007.23(1):1-43
Sources for recent updates included journal publications in reputable peer-reviewed journals indexed in Russian and international citation databases.
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
Geriatrician.
General practitioner / Physician.
General practitioner (family physician).
Neurologist.
Cardiologist.
Nephrologist.
Gastroenterologist.
Rheumatologist.
Physical and rehabilitation medicine physician.
Physiotherapist.
Table 1. Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except randomized controlled trials, with meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for prevention, treatment, and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitation interventions)
LoE | Definitions |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of RCTs with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual RCTs and systematic reviews of studies of any design except RCTs, with meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Scale for assessing the levels of recommendation persuasiveness (LRP) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment and medical rehabilitation methods, including those based on natural therapeutic factors (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
B | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.
The mechanism for updating clinical guidelines provides for their systematic revision at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based medicine data on the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or in the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Table 1. Treatment regimens for vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency.
Correction of vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D level < 20 ng/mL) |
|---|
|
Correction of vitamin D insufficiency (25(OH)D level ≥ 20 and < 30 ng/mL) |
|
Maintenance of vitamin D levels ≥ 30 ng/mL |
|
(Dosage form: film-coated tablets or capsules)
Table 2. Indications for prescribing active vitamin D metabolites (alphacalcidol**, calcitriol**) and their analogues
Absolute | Relative |
|---|---|
Secondary hyperparathyroidism in end-stage CKD | Secondary hyperparathyroidism in CKD (GFR less than 60 mL/min) |
Hypoparathyroidism | In combination therapy for osteoporosis |
Pseudohypoparathyroidism | |
Vitamin D-resistant rickets | |
Vitamin D-dependent rickets | |
Severe hypocalcemia |
Table 3. Oral enteral nutrition (sip feeds).
Composition | Protein per serving, g | Volume, mL | Contraindications |
|---|---|---|---|
Glucose syrup, sucrose, inulin (from chicory), calcium caseinate, milk protein concentrate, sunflower oil, rapeseed oil, maltodextrin, wheat dextrin, vitamin A (retinol palmitate), vitamin premix (vitamins C (L-ascorbic acid), niacin (nicotinamide), pantothenic acid (calcium D-pantothenate), E (DL-alpha-tocopheryl acetate), B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride), B2 (sodium riboflavin 5′-phosphate), β-carotene, B1 (thiamine hydrochloride), A (retinol palmitate), folic acid (N-pteroyl-L-glutamic acid), K1 (phylloquinone), biotin (D-biotin), D3 (cholecalciferol), B12 (cyanocobalamin)), vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid), D3 (cholecalciferol), β-carotene, potassium citrate, potassium carbonate, sodium chloride, sodium carbonate, magnesium oxide, ferric pyrophosphate, zinc sulfate, manganese chloride, copper sulfate, sodium fluoride, chromium chloride, sodium molybdate, potassium iodide, sodium selenite, emulsifiers (E 471, soy lecithin), acidity regulators (E507), water | 20 | 200 | Not suitable for patients with galactosemia or individual intolerance |
Water; cow's milk proteins; maltodextrin; sugar; vegetable oils (rapeseed, sunflower); magnesium hydrogen phosphate; emulsifier: soy lecithin; choline chloride; flavoring; sodium L-ascorbate; color (curcumin); potassium citrate; color (carminic acid); dipotassium hydrogen phosphate; iron lactate; DL-alpha-tocopheryl acetate; retinol acetate; copper gluconate; zinc sulfate; manganese sulfate; calcium D-pantothenate; sodium selenite; D-biotin; chromium chloride; cholecalciferol; thiamine hydrochloride; pteroylmonoglutamic acid; pyridoxine hydrochloride; nicotinamide; potassium iodide; riboflavin; sodium molybdate; sodium fluoride; cyanocobalamin; phytomenadione | 18 | 125 | In case of severe gastrointestinal dysfunction resulting from intestinal obstruction, gastrointestinal perforation, intestinal ischemia, or individual intolerance |
Water, milk protein, glucose syrup, sucrose, vegetable oil (rapeseed), minerals (potassium chloride, potassium citrate, sodium citrate, magnesium citrate, magnesium oxide, ferrous sulfate, zinc sulfate, manganese sulfate, copper sulfate, sodium fluoride, chromium chloride, sodium molybdate, potassium iodide, sodium selenite), emulsifier (E471), starch, vitamins (C, E, niacin, pantothenic acid, B6, A, B1, B2, folic acid, K, biotin, D), stabilizer (carrageenan), flavoring | 18.8 | 200 | Not suitable for patients with galactosemia or individual intolerance |
Water, milk protein, sucrose, maltodextrin, fish oil (with soy lecithin), vegetable oils, medium-chain triglycerides (MCT), inulin (from chicory), flavoring, wheat dextrin, potassium citrate, emulsifiers (E 471, soy lecithin), sodium chloride, sodium citrate, vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid), magnesium oxide, ferric pyrophosphate, magnesium citrate, zinc sulfate, niacin (nicotinamide), vitamin E (DL-alpha-tocopheryl acetate), manganese chloride, pantothenic acid (calcium D-pantothenate), copper sulfate, vitamin B2 (riboflavin), vitamin B6 (pyridoxine hydrochloride), sodium fluoride, vitamin B1 (thiamine hydrochloride), β-carotene (beta-carotene), vitamin A (retinol palmitate), folic acid, potassium iodide, chromium chloride, sodium selenite, sodium molybdate, vitamin K1 (phylloquinone), biotin, vitamin D3, vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) | 20 | 200 | In case of individual intolerance |
Related Documents
Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 38n dated January 29, 2016, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care in the Profile of 'Geriatrics'."
Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 1067n dated December 20, 2019, "On Amendments to the Procedure for Providing Medical Care in the Profile of 'Geriatrics', Approved by Order of the Russian Ministry of Health No. 38n dated January 29, 2016."
Clinical Guidelines KR 613 "Frailty."
Clinical Guidelines "Falls in Older and Elderly Patients."
Clinical Guidelines "Chronic Pain in Older and Elderly Patients."
Pharmacotherapy in Older and Elderly Persons / D.A. Syчев, O.N. Tкачева, Yu.V. Kotovskaya, I.P. Malaya. – M.: KONGRESSKHIM LLC Publishing House – 2024. – 124 p.
Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis / A. J. Cruz-Jentoft, G. Bahat, J. Bauer [et al.] // Age and Ageing. — 2019. — Vol. 48, N 1. — P. 16–31]
Sarcopenia in Asia: Consensus Report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia / L.-K. Chen, L.-K. Liu, M. J. Woo [et al.] // J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. — 2014. — Vol. 15, N 2. — P. 95–101.
Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia / R. A. Fielding, B. Vellas, W. J. Evans [et al.] // J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. — 2011. — Vol. 12, N 4. — P. 249–256.
The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates / S. A. Studenski, K. W. Peters, D. E. Alley [et al.] // J. Gerontol. ABiol. Sci. Med. Sci. — 2014. — Vol. 69, N 5. — P. 547–558].
Kirk B, Zanker J, Bani Hassan E, Bird S, Brennan-Olsen S, Duque G. Sarcopenia Definitions and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC) Criteria are Strongly Associated With Malnutrition, Depression, Falls, and Fractures in High-Risk Older Persons. JAmMedDirAssoc. 2021 Apr;22(4):741-745].
Chew S. T. H. et al. Singapore multidisciplinary consensus recommendations on muscle health in older adults: assessment and multimodal targeted intervention across the continuum of care // BMC Geriatrics. – 2021. – Vol. 21. – No. 1. – P. 314.
Dent E. et al. International clinical practice guidelines for sarcopenia (ICFSR): screening, diagnosis and management // The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging. – 2018. – Vol. 22. – P. 1148-1161]
Zanker J. et al. Consensus guidelines for sarcopenia prevention, diagnosis and management in Australia and New Zealand // Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle. – 2023. – Vol. 14. – No. 1. – P. 142-156
C. Beaudart, Y. Rolland, A. J. Cruz Jentoft et.al. Assessment of Muscle Function and Physical Performance in Daily Clinical Practice. A position paper endorsed by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO). Calcifed Tissue International (2019) 105:1–14 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-019-00545-w
Bhasin S. et al. Sarcopenia definition: the position statements of the sarcopenia definition and outcomes consortium // Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. – 2020. – Vol. 68. – No. 7. – P. 1410-1418
Kirk B. et al. The Conceptual Definition of Sarcopenia: Delphi Consensus from the Global Leadership Initiative in Sarcopenia (GLIS) //Age and ageing. – 2024.
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

* Interventions
Physician actions | INTERVENTION STRATEGY | COMMENTS |
|---|---|---|
Laboratory diagnostics: | Serum 25(OH)D3 concentration; TSH, GFR, total protein, albumin | If reference values change, correction is required |
Physical activity: | Complex of therapeutic exercises (with an emphasis on isometric exercises) | Up to 150 minutes per week |
Protein intake: | 1.0 – 1.5 g of protein per 1 kg of patient body weight; for severe sarcopenia, 2.0 g of protein per 1 kg of patient body weight | If it is impossible to ensure protein intake from food sources, the choice of sip feeds should be discussed |
Appendix C. Patient Information
It is known that starting from the age of 30, a gradual loss of muscle mass occurs in humans, with approximately 8% of muscle lost per decade of life. At age over 70, muscle tissue loss increases to 15% for each subsequent decade. Ultimately, by age 80, a person may lose more than half of their muscle mass.
The reduction in the quantity and quality of muscle mass in elderly patients due to age-related changes leads to a decrease in glucose uptake by muscles and impaired glycemic control. In turn, "poor" glycemic control accelerates the decline in muscle mass quantity and quality, which can lead to the development of such a formidable geriatric syndrome as sarcopenia. Inadequate physical activity against the background of muscle mass loss is also a factor in the development of sarcopenia.
Sarcopenia (from Greek *sarco* – "flesh", *penia* – "loss") is an age-associated or age-related muscle disease characterized by a decrease not only in the quantity and quality of muscle mass, but also in muscle strength and function.
Why is sarcopenia dangerous? Loss of muscle mass and strength is a significant risk factor for fractures in elderly patients. This occurs because sarcopenia negatively affects the ability to maintain balance during walking and movement, thereby creating a risk of falls, contributing to a decrease in walking speed, and impairing self-care in daily life.
When sarcopenia is combined with other age-related diseases, its impact can be even more pronounced. For example, the presence of osteoporosis (a disease in which bones become fragile and break easily) combined with sarcopenia additionally and significantly increases the risk of falls and fractures.
You can independently assess whether you have probable sarcopenia using a simple handgrip dynamometer test (Figure 2). To do this, take the dynamometer in your hand, extend your arm to the side at shoulder level, and squeeze the dynamometer as hard as possible. Two measurements must be taken on each hand and the best result recorded. Approximate normal handgrip dynamometry values for elderly individuals are > 27 kg for men and > 16 kg for women.
Currently, there is no officially approved medicinal product for the treatment of sarcopenia.
The main methods for preventing and influencing sarcopenia are optimal protein intake, vitamin D supplementation, and physical exercise. Physical exertion helps increase muscle strength and ensure muscle mass gain, making it the simplest and most accessible method for alleviating the patient's condition.
Any muscular contraction requires energy. Our muscles consist of bundles of muscle fibers. When the nervous system issues a command, these fibers contract and work is performed—a person lifts weights or moves their body in space. Muscle fibers can receive "fuel" through two types of metabolism (or energy expenditure): aerobic or anaerobic.
The aerobic mechanism occurs when a lot of oxygen is required to produce energy, and the energy substrates are glucose, fatty acids, and glucose metabolites such as ketone bodies and lactic acid. When energy synthesis involves oxygen, our heart rate increases and reaches up to 70% of its maximum value. To determine your upper heart rate limit, subtract your age from 220. For example, if you are 30 years old, your maximum heart rate is 190 beats per minute. Aerobic exercise consists of rhythmic, repetitive, or continuous movements of the same large muscle groups lasting at least 5 minutes. These include: walking, swimming, yoga, cycling, skiing, ice skating and rollerblading, brisk running, dancing, stationary cycling, and treadmill exercise.
The anaerobic mechanism (or oxygen-free mechanism) is when muscle activity uses energy stored by the body, consuming a high amount of glucose and little oxygen. Under these conditions, muscle fibers are capable of performing significant work, but not for very long because they fatigue quickly and require a lot of energy. Anaerobic loads are characterized by short duration and high intensity. Anaerobic or strength training aims to increase muscle mass and strength through weightlifting or resistance to muscle movement. During anaerobic physical activity, the release of counter-regulatory hormones increases significantly, which in patients with diabetes mellitus can, on the one hand, lead to a pronounced increase in blood glucose levels, while on the other hand increasing cellular sensitivity to insulin, which can promote muscle mass growth.
Human muscles are bundles of muscle fibers, some of which use aerobic metabolism while others use anaerobic metabolism. Therefore, aerobic and anaerobic exercises should be alternated every other day. "Aerobic exercise saves our lives by preventing heart attacks, while anaerobic exercise makes life more worthwhile by strengthening bones and joints" (K. Crowley). Anaerobic and anaerobic-aerobic types of physical activity are beneficial for elderly patients with diabetes mellitus, because physical training increases the number of "glucose transporters" inside cells. This occurs not only in muscle cells, but also in the liver. Improving impaired metabolism helps improve the quality of muscle mass and, accordingly, its function, which is especially important in older patients.
Thus, physical activity is an important component of the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia. Physical activity is just as beneficial for the older age group as it is for the young.
What do you need to know before starting physical exercise?
Many patients do not undertake any significant physical activity for years, aside from routine daily activities. Intensive physical activity cannot be recommended to all patients without exception, as comorbid conditions may limit the capacity for significant physical exertion. Every patient should discuss their capabilities with a physician.
Nevertheless, we can provide some general recommendations regarding physical activity for patients with sarcopenia:
The most acceptable and safe exercise program consists of light, followed by moderate-intensity physical exercises. If a person is starting "from scratch," their duration should gradually increase from 5–10 to 45–60 minutes.
The regularity of physical exercise is important. It must be undertaken at least 3 times a week; only in this case can a positive effect be expected. The benefits of physical exercise fade very quickly in the event of prolonged pauses.
During periods of physical exertion, monitoring one's own condition is of particular importance.
It must be taken into account that significant routine physical exertion may occur in many people outside of fitness and sports activities—for example, major house cleaning or garden work. These loads also require careful monitoring.
Precautions regarding physical exercise:
Caution is necessary in the presence of comorbid conditions (coronary artery disease, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus), as well as complications of diabetes. Inadequate physical exertion can worsen the condition of patients with these problems. Consult your doctor before starting physical exercise.
Any unpleasant sensations during physical exertion are a warning sign: pain and palpitations, headache, dizziness, shortness of breath. They should not be pushed through. You must stop the workout and, if necessary, consult a physician.
Footwear must be as comfortable as possible, and a thorough inspection of the feet before and especially after exercise is essential to avoid accidental chafing or injury.
If you have diabetes mellitus and are receiving insulin or sulfonylurea glucose-lowering drugs such as glibenclamide, gliclazide, glimepiride, and similar medications that stimulate insulin production, it is very important to remember that physical activity can lead to a drop in blood sugar or hypoglycemia. This condition can occur both during exertion and several hours afterwards. Therefore, when engaging in physical activity, it is necessary to carry easily digestible carbohydrates (sugar, fruit juice) to treat potential hypoglycemia. Consult your doctor before starting physical exercise.
EXERCISE PROGRAM [309]
The exercises presented below consist of 4 groups: balance exercises, strength exercises for the arms and legs, foot exercises, and flexibility exercises. It is recommended to start the first training sessions under the supervision of a physical therapy instructor, who will help select exercises taking into account your individual characteristics.
The best results are achieved by performing the exercises 3 times a week. Optimally, perform 3 sets of 8 to 12 repetitions of each exercise, taking a rest pause of about 2 minutes between them.
BALANCE EXERCISES
Initially, these exercises are performed with the hands resting on a table, chair, wall, or another stable object. As soon as you become confident in performing the exercises with hand support, you can switch to single-finger support, and then abandon support altogether (though you should still perform the exercise near an object you can grab in case of a loss of balance). If you are stable while performing the exercises, you can try performing them with your eyes closed (with or without support).
Exercise 1. Plantar flexion.

Starting position: standing, holding onto a table or the back of a chair to maintain balance.
Slowly rise up onto your toes as high as you can (INHALE).
Hold this position for 1–2 seconds.
Slowly lower yourself back onto your heels over 3 seconds (EXHALE).
Exercise 2. Knee flexion.

Starting position: standing, holding onto a table or the back of a chair to maintain balance.
Slowly bend one leg at the knee without flexing it at the hip joint (INHALE).
Hold this position for 1–2 seconds.
Slowly lower the leg to the floor into the starting position (EXHALE).
Repeat the exercise with the other leg.
Exercise 3. Hip flexion.

Starting position: standing, holding onto a table or the back of a chair to maintain balance.
Slowly bend one leg at the knee toward your chest, without leaning your torso or flexing the other leg at the hip joint (INHALE).
Hold this position for 1–2 seconds.
Slowly lower the leg to the floor into the starting position (EXHALE).
Repeat the exercise with the other leg.
Exercise 4. Lateral leg abduction.

Starting position: standing, holding onto a table or the back of a chair to maintain balance. The back and knees must be straight during the exercise.
Slowly move one leg out to the side by 15–30 cm (INHALE).
Hold this position for 1–2 seconds.
Slowly lower the leg to the floor into the starting position (EXHALE).
Repeat the exercise with the other leg.
Exercise 5. Hip extension (straight leg swing backward).

Starting position: standing, 30–45 cm away from a table or the back of a chair.
Flex your hips and hold onto the table or the back of the chair.
Slowly lift one straight leg backward (INHALE).
Hold this position for 1–2 seconds.
Slowly lower the leg to the floor into the starting position (EXHALE).
Repeat the exercise with the other leg.
Exercise 6. Knee extension.

Starting position: sitting. Place a bolster under your knees if necessary (feet should lightly touch the floor).
Place your hands on your knees or at the sides of the chair.
Slowly lift one leg and extend it in front of you, parallel to the floor, to straighten it at the knee joint.
Pull your toes toward yourself.
Hold this position for 1–2 seconds.
Slowly (over 3–5 seconds) lower the leg to the starting position.
Repeat the exercise with the other leg.
Exercise 7. Tandem walking ("heel-to-toe" walking).

Starting position: standing, with one foot placed in front of the other, the heel of one foot touching the toes of the other.
Imagine a straight line.
Take 8–15 steps straight forward, alternating your feet. Then take 8–15 steps backward.
Repeat the exercise.
Exercise 8. Figure-eight walking (walking with directional changes).

Starting position: standing. Place any 2 objects at a short distance apart.
Mentally trace a figure-eight between 2 objects.
Start walking in a figure-eight pattern between the 2 objects.
Walk the figure-eight pattern twice.
Rest and then repeat the exercise.
Exercise 9. Walking with tossing a ball upwards.

Starting position: standing, with arms slightly bent in front of you as if holding a ball.
Begin walking, imitating the arm motion of tossing a ball up and catching it. If you do not experience dizziness, loss of step tempo, or instability, you may proceed to perform the exercise with a real ball.
Walk forward and backward for 10–15 steps, trying to toss and catch the imaginary or real ball.
Rest for a minute, then repeat the exercise.
Exercise 10. Toe and heel walking.

Starting position: standing. During the exercise, you may hold onto a wall or handrail (as shown in the figure).
Walk on your toes counting to 10.
Stop, count to 10, turn around.
Walk on your heels counting to 10.
Rest for a minute, then repeat the exercise.
Exercise 11. Walking "over an obstacle".

Starting position: standing. Place a small "obstacle" 15 cm high on the floor, such as a shoebox. During the exercise, you may hold onto a wall or chair.
Place the "obstacle" (box) in front of you.
Step over the "obstacle".
Turn around and step over it again.
Repeat the exercise 10–15 times.
Rest for a minute, then repeat the exercise another 10 times.
Exercise 12. Standing up from a chair.

Starting position: sitting on a chair. You can place a pillow against the backrest to support your back.
Sitting on the edge of the chair, lean back (back and shoulders remain straight, knees bent, feet pressed to the floor). (EXHALE).
Then sit up straight, trying not to use your hands for assistance. (INHALE). The goal is not to use them at all, if possible.
Slowly stand up from the chair, ideally without using your hands. Slowly sit back down.
Keep your back and shoulders straight while performing the exercise.
STRENGTH EXERCISES FOR ARMS AND LEGS
Exercise 1. For arm muscles, using a resistance band (option 1).

Starting position: sitting on a chair.
Hold the ends of the resistance band.
Stretch the band at chest level and move your arms out to the sides, fully straightening them (INHALE).
Initiate the stretching movement from your shoulder blades, trying to squeeze them together.
Relax the band and bring your arms together at chest level (EXHALE).
Repeat the exercise.
Exercise 1. For arm muscles, using a resistance band (option 2).

Starting position: sitting on a chair.
Hold the ends of the resistance band.
Begin moving your arms apart diagonally from each other — one upwards, the other downwards (INHALE).
Bring your arms together (EXHALE).
Repeat the exercise.
Exercise 2. "Towel wringing".

Starting position: standing.
Hold a towel with both hands.
Begin gradually twisting it (as if wringing out water) as hard as you can.
Repeat the exercise.
Exercise 3. "Ball squeezing".

Starting position: standing.
Take a rubber or stress ball that fits completely in your hand.
Slowly squeeze the ball as hard as possible, hold for 3–5 seconds.
Slowly release your hand.
Repeat the exercise.
Exercise 4. Biceps curls with dumbbells.


Starting position: sitting (easy option) or standing (advanced option).
Feet on the floor, shoulders relaxed, back straight, stomach pulled in.
Hold dumbbells or other objects weighing 0.5–1.5 kg (e.g., water bottles) in your hands.
Rest your hands with dumbbells on your thighs with palms facing up. Keep your elbows pressed to your body.
Bend your arms with dumbbells until your wrists almost touch your shoulders (INHALE). Hold at the top for 1–2 seconds, slowly lower your arms (EXHALE).
Repeat the exercise.
Exercise 5. For lower extremity muscles, using a resistance band.
You will need a rubber resistance band that allows you to perform the exercise 30 times without stopping, while feeling "muscle fatigue" at the end.

Starting position: sitting on a chair, feet together.
Place the band around your legs just above the knees.
Move your knees apart as far as possible, overcoming the resistance of the band (INHALE).
Bring your knees together (EXHALE).
Repeat the exercise.
FOOT EXERCISES
Exercise 1. Feet on the floor.
Starting position: sitting on a chair.
a. Foot pressed to the floor. Alternately (or simultaneously) flex and extend the toes of your right and left foot.

b. Foot pressed to the floor. Alternately (or simultaneously) raise and lower the toes of the right and left foot. Make circular motions.

c. The foot remains on the floor. Alternately (or simultaneously) raise and lower the heels of the right and left foot, make circular motions. Raise your heels, move them apart, bring them together.

Exercise 2. With marbles.
Starting position: sitting on a chair, back straight, feet flat on the floor.
Place an empty bowl in front of you and a container with marbles (20 marbles will be enough to start).
Using only your toes, pick up one marble at a time and transfer it to the empty bowl.
Repeat the exercise with the other leg.

(image source: https://pikabu.ru/story/vsego_2_uprazhneniya_i_ploskostopie_vas_ne_pobespokoit_6299200)
Exercise 3. With a towel.
The exercise can be performed with each foot in turn or both at once.
Starting position: sitting on a chair. Place a towel on the floor.
Place your feet on the near edge of the towel.
Using your toes, scrunch the towel towards you, trying not to lift your heel off the floor.

(image source: https://lifehacker.ru/uprazhneniya-ot-ploskostopiya-kak-ukrepit-svod-stopy).
FLEXIBILITY EXERCISES
Exercise 1. Neck muscle stretching.

Starting position: standing, feet shoulder-width apart, knees slightly bent. Or starting position: sitting on a chair, back straight, feet pressed to the floor.
Relax your shoulders and tilt your head towards your right shoulder. Hold this position for 5 seconds.
Then tilt your head to the left shoulder. Hold this position for 5 seconds.
Repeat the exercise 2–3 times.
Exercise 2. Stretching the shoulder and upper-posterior chest muscles.

Starting position: sitting on the edge of a chair, arms down.
Pull your arms back, try to hold onto the back of the chair.
Straighten your shoulders and, without taking your hands off the back of the chair, lean forward until a slight tension appears in the arm muscles.
Hold this position for 10 seconds.
Then relax for about 5 seconds, keeping your hands on the back of the chair.
Repeat the exercise 2–3 times.
Exercise 3. Thigh muscle stretching.
Starting position: lying on the floor, on your right side.
Rest your head on a pillow or your arm.
Bend your upper (left) leg at the knee.
Grab your left heel with your left hand and pull slightly to feel a stretch in the anterior thigh. If you cannot reach your foot, simply bend your knee and reach with your fingers toward your buttocks.
Hold this position for 10–30 seconds.
Smoothly release the foot while straightening the leg.
Roll over to the other side and repeat the exercise.
Perform 3–5 sets on each side.

Exercise 4. Calf muscle stretching.
The exercise is performed without shoes.

Starting position: sitting on the edge of a chair, lean back against its backrest, using a pillow for back support. Extend your legs forward so that your weight rests only on your heels.
Pull your toes toward yourself.
Point your toes away from you.
Hold this position. You should feel a stretch in the ankle joints. If this does not happen, lift your heels slightly off the floor while performing the exercise.
The presented exercises will help strengthen the arm and leg muscles, improve coordination and balance, thereby reducing the risk of falls, increasing physical tone, and consequently improving the well-being and quality of life of a patient with sarcopenia.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
APPENDIX G1. "Age is Not an Obstacle" Questionnaire
Russian name: “Age is No Obstacle” questionnaire.
Original name: “Age is No Obstacle” questionnaire.
Source: Tkacheva O.N., Runikhina N.K., Ostapenko V.S., Sharashkina N.V., Mkhitaryan E.A., Onuchina Yu.S., Lysenkov S.N. Validation of the screening questionnaire for frailty syndrome in outpatient practice // ADVANCES IN GERONTOLOGY, 2017, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 236-242.
Type (underline):
- rating scale;
- index;
- questionnaire;
- other.
Purpose: screening for frailty syndrome.
Content (template):
The “Age is No Obstacle” questionnaire was developed and validated for frailty screening. It includes 7 questions concerning weight loss, sensory deficits, falls, symptoms of depression and cognitive impairment, urinary incontinence, and decreased mobility. The questionnaire can be filled out by a nurse or non-medical personnel (e.g., volunteers), as well as by the patient themselves. For each positive answer, the patient scores 1 point, and for a negative answer, 0 points. The maximum score on the questionnaire is seven.
№ | Questions | Answer |
|---|---|---|
1 | Have you lost 5 kg or more in the last 6 months?* | yes/no |
2 | Do you experience any limitations in daily life due to decreased vision or hearing? | yes/no |
3 | Have you had any fall-related injuries or falls without injuries in the past year? | yes/no |
4 | Have you been feeling down, sad, or anxious over the past few weeks? | yes/no |
5 | Do you have problems with memory, comprehension, orientation, or planning ability? | yes/no |
6 | Do you suffer from urinary incontinence? | yes/no |
7 | Do you experience difficulties moving around the house or outdoors? (Walking up to 100 meters or climbing 1 flight of stairs) | yes/no |
* This refers to unintentional weight loss. If the patient lost weight intentionally — through a special diet or regular physical activity, no point is awarded. 1 point is awarded for each positive answer.
Key (interpretation):
1–2 points – no frailty;
3–4 points – pre-frailty;
5 or more points – probable senile asthenia.
Appendix G2. Fracture Risk Assessment using FRAX
Russian title: FRAX – Fracture Risk Assessment Tool.
Original title (if applicable): FRAX ® - Fracture Risk Assessment Tool.
Source (official developer website, validation publication):
https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/FRAX/tool.aspx?lang=rsLesnyak, Olga M. et al. “Epidemiology of fracture in the Russian Federation and the development of a FRAX model.” ArchivesofOsteoporosis 7 (2012): 67-73.
Type: rating scale.
Purpose: assessment of fracture risk.
Content:
To calculate the 10-year probability of fracture using bone mineral density, please answer the following questions.
Questionnaire:

Key (interpretation):
Fracture risk assessment result in the orange zone: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and proximal femur is recommended. If osteoporosis is detected (T-score < -2.5), anti-osteoporotic therapy is indicated without re-assessing fracture risk.
Fracture risk assessment result in the red zone: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and proximal femur is not indicated; the patient unequivocally requires anti-osteoporotic therapy.
Fracture risk assessment result in the green zone: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) of the lumbar spine and proximal femur is not indicated; the patient does not require anti-osteoporotic therapy.

Notes:
For clinical risk factors, answer "yes" or "no". If a field is left blank, the default answer is "no".
Age | The model works for ages 40 to 90 years. If lower or higher values are entered, the program will calculate the probability for 40 or 90 years, respectively. |
|---|---|
Sex | Male or female. Select the appropriate one. |
Weight | Must be entered in kg. |
Growth | Must be entered in cm. |
Previous fracture | A previous fracture refers to a prior fracture in an adult occurring spontaneously or resulting from a trauma that would not have caused a fracture in a healthy person. Answer "yes" or "no" (see also risk factor notes). |
Parental hip fracture | Inquiry into the history of hip fractures in the father or mother. Answer "yes" or "no". |
Current smoking | Answer "yes" or "no" depending on whether the patient is currently a smoker (see also risk factor notes). |
Glucocorticoids | Enter "yes" if the patient is currently taking oral glucocorticoids or has taken oral glucocorticoids for more than 3 months at a dose of 5 mg/day or more of prednisolone** (or equivalent doses of other glucocorticoids) (see also risk factor description). |
Rheumatoid arthritis | Answer "yes" if the patient has a confirmed diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Otherwise, answer "no" (see also risk factor notes). |
Secondary osteoporosis | Enter "yes" if the patient has a condition with a proven association with osteoporosis. These may include type 1 diabetes mellitus (insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus), osteogenesis imperfecta in adults, untreated long-standing hyperthyroidism, hypogonadism or early menopause (< 45 years), chronic malnutrition or malabsorption, and chronic liver disease. |
Alcohol 3 or more units per day | Answer "yes" if the patient consumes 3 or more units of alcohol per day. A unit of alcohol varies slightly across different countries from 8 to 10 g of alcohol. This corresponds to a standard glass of beer (285 ml), a standard shot of spirits (30 ml), a medium-sized glass of wine (120 ml), or a single serving of aperitif (60 ml) (see also risk factor notes). |
Bone mineral density (BMD) | Select the DXA densitometer brand, then enter the femoral neck BMD in g/cm2. If BMD was not assessed, leave the field blank. |
Risk factor notes
Previous fracture. A special situation applies to a previous vertebral fracture. If a fracture was detected only on imaging (morphometric vertebral fracture), it is considered a previous fracture. However, a prior clinically overt vertebral fracture, along with a hip fracture, is a particularly strong risk factor. Therefore, in this case, the calculated fracture probability may be artificially underestimated. Additionally, the calculated fracture probability will be artificially underestimated in patients with multiple prior fractures.
Smoking, alcohol, glucocorticoids. These risk factors are likely dose-dependent. This is not accounted for in the model, and average values are assumed in the calculation. Clinical judgment should be applied for very low or very high doses.
Rheumatoid arthritis. A documented diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis is taken into account.
Bone mineral density. DXA densitometry data of the femoral neck are used.
Appendix G3. Mini Nutritional Assessment
Russian title: Mini Nutritional Assessment.
Original title (if applicable): Mini Nutritional Assessment, MNA.
Source (official developer website, validation publication):
Kaiser MJ, Bauer JM, Ramsch C, Uter W, Guigoz Y, Cederholm T, Thomas DR, Anthony P, Charlton KE, Maggio M, Tsai AC, Grathwohl D, Vellas B, Sieber CC; MNA-International Group. Validation of the Mini Nutritional Assessment short-form (MNA-SF): a practical tool for identification of nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009
Type: scale.
Purpose: screening for malnutrition in elderly and senile patients.
Content (template):
It is necessary to complete the screening part (from item "A" to item "E") and sum up the obtained points. If the result is less than 12 points, continue the assessment by adding the subsequent points to the sum of the screening part.
Screening part (items A-E) | ||
|---|---|---|
A. | Has food intake declined over the past 3 months due to loss of appetite, digestive problems, chewing or swallowing difficulties? | severe decrease in food intake = 0 points moderate decrease = 1 point no decrease in food intake = 2 points |
B. | Weight loss over the last 3 months | weight loss greater than 3 kg = 0 points does not know = 1 point weight loss between 1 and 3 kg = 2 points no weight loss = 3 points |
C. | Locomotion | bed or chair bound = 0 points able to get out of bed / chair, but does not go out = 1 point goes out = 2 points |
D. | Acute illness or psychological stress in the past 3 months | yes = 0 points no = 2 points |
E. | Neuropsychological problems | severe dementia or depression = 0 points mild dementia = 1 point no psychological problems = 2 points |
F. | Body mass index | less than 19 kg/m2 – 0 points 19-20 kg/m2 – 1 point 21 to less than 23 kg/m2 = 2 points 23 kg/m2 and higher – 3 points |
Screening score: _____/14 Interpretation: If the score for the screening part is 12-14 points, nutritional status is normal. If the score for the screening part is less than 12 points, continue the questionnaire. | ||
G. | Lives independently (not in a nursing home or hospital) | no = 0 points yes = 1 point |
H. | Takes more than 3 prescription drugs per day | yes = 0 points no = 1 point |
I. | Pressure sores or skin ulcers | yes = 0 points no = 1 point |
K. | How many full meals does the patient eat daily? | 1 meal = 0 points 2 meals = 1 point 3 meals = 2 points |
L. | Protein consumption markers: | if 0-1 "yes" answer – 0 points if 2 "yes" answers – 0.5 points if 3 "yes" answers – 1 point |
at least one serving of dairy products (milk, cheese, yogurt) per day (yes / no) | ||
beans or eggs 2 or more times per week (yes / no) | ||
meat, fish or poultry every day (yes / no) | ||
M. | Consumes two or more servings of fruit or vegetables per day (1 serving = 200 g of vegetables, 1 medium-sized piece of fruit) | no = 0 points yes = 1 point |
N. | Amount of fluid consumed per day | less than 3 cups = 0 points 3–5 glasses – 0.5 points more than 5 glasses – 1 point |
O. | Dietary intake | unable to eat without assistance – 0 points eats independently with minor difficulties – 1 point eats independently – 2 points |
P. | Self-assessment of nutritional status | rates themselves as having poor nutritional intake – 0 points rates their nutritional status as uncertain – 1 point rates themselves as having no nutritional problems – 2 points |
R. | Health status compared to other people of the same age | not as good – 0 points does not know – 0.5 points about the same – 1 point better – 2 points |
S. | Mid-upper arm circumference | 20 cm or less – 0 points 21-22 cm – 0.5 points 23 cm and more – 1 point |
T. | Calf circumference | less than 31 cm – 0 points 31 cm or more – 1 point |
Total score: ___________/30
Interpretation of results (full scale from A to T):
> 23.5 points – normal nutritional status
17–23.5 points – risk of malnutrition
< 17 points – malnutrition
APPENDIX G4. Digital rating (numerical rank) pain scale
Russian title: Numeric Rating Scale for pain.
Original title: Numeric Rating Scale.
Source: Bijur, P.E., Latimer, C.T. and Gallagher, E.J. (2003), Validation of a Verbally Administered Numerical Rating Scale of Acute Pain for Use in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 10: 390-392. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb01355.x
Type (underline):
rating scale
index
questionnaire
other
Purpose: assessment of pain intensity.
Content (template):
The scale consists of a sequential series of numbers from 0 to 10. Patients are asked to rate their pain intensity using numbers: 0 – no pain, 5 – moderate pain, and 10 – worst pain imaginable.
Key (interpretation):
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No pain | Moderate pain | Very severe pain |
APPENDIX G5. DYNAMOMETRY
Original title: Handgrip strength testing.
Source: American Society of Hand Therapists (ASHT) protocol of 1992 (updated in 2015).
Roberts, Helen C., et al. "A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach." Age and ageing 40.4 (2011): 423-429.
Type: strength index.
Purpose: measurement of grip strength.
Content (template):
Dynamometry procedure
Dynamometry is performed using an electronic or mechanical dynamometer. Before starting, ensure the dynamometer is calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions to guarantee measurement accuracy. The patient should be in a sitting position with the arm supported on a horizontal surface, the shoulder in a neutral position, the elbow flexed at 90 degrees, and the wrist in palmar flexion at an angle of 0 to 30°. Ask the patient to hold the dynamometer so that the handle rests comfortably in the palm and fits snugly against the fingers [271]. Squeeze the dynamometer with maximum force for approximately 3–5 seconds. To obtain more accurate results, it is recommended to measure muscle strength three times on both the right and left hands. The rest time between sets is about 1 minute. To evaluate the results, the maximum muscle strength value of the stronger hand is used.
Key (interpretation):
Criteria for low grip strength according to gender and body mass index
Gender | Grip strength, kg |
|---|---|
Men | Less than 27 kg – decreased muscle strength is present 27 kg or more – no decrease in muscle strength |
Women | < 16 kg – decreased muscle strength is present 16 kg or more – no decrease in muscle strength |
APPENDIX G6. Methodology for the Short Physical Performance Battery and Interpretation of Results
Russian title: Short Physical Performance Battery.
Original title: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB).
Source: nia.nih.gov/research/labs/leps/short-physical-performance-battery-sppb
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Assessing Physical Performance in the Older Patient
Type:
- assessment scale: lower extremity function in older adults.
Purpose: evaluation of physical performance in elderly patients.
Content (template):
1. Balance assessment
The examining nurse explains to the patient: This test consists of three parts. In the first part, you must try to maintain your balance in three different positions. I will first describe and then demonstrate each of these positions.
A. Side-by-side stand

Now I will show you the first position (demonstrate). I need you to stand in this position with your feet together for 10 seconds. You may use your arms to balance, bend your knees, or move your body to maintain your balance, but try not to move your feet or hold onto anything. Try to remain in this position for 10 seconds until you hear the command 'stop'.
As soon as the nurse sees that the patient is standing independently (without support), she starts the stopwatch. Stop the stopwatch after 10 seconds, or as soon as the patient changes foot position or touches something for support.
B. Semi-tandem stand

The examining nurse: now, I will show you the second position (demonstrate). You need to stand for 10 seconds with one foot placed forward so that the toe of one foot is alongside the heel or instep of the other foot, and the inner surfaces of both feet are touching. You may place either foot forward, whichever is more comfortable for you. You may use your arms to balance, bend your knees, or move your body to maintain your balance, but try not to move your feet or hold onto anything. Remain in this position until you hear the command 'Stop'.
As soon as the nurse sees that the patient is standing independently (without support), she starts the stopwatch. Stop the stopwatch after 10 seconds, or as soon as the patient changes foot position or touches something for support, and say: 'Stop'.
C. Tandem stand

The examining nurse: now, I ask you to assume the third position. (Demonstrate). Stand with the heel of one foot directly in front of and touching the toes of the other foot. Stand like this for 10 seconds. You may put either foot forward, whichever is most comfortable for you. You may use your arms to balance, bend your knees, or move your body to maintain your balance, but try not to move your feet. Try to remain in this position until you hear the command 'Stop'.
As soon as the nurse sees that the patient is standing independently (without support), she starts the stopwatch. Stop the stopwatch after 10 seconds, or as soon as the patient changes foot position or touches something for support, and say: 'Stop'.
2. 4-meter gait speed test
Required distance: about 6 meters (corridor, room). Measure a distance of 4 meters from the 'Start' mark. The patient should be able to continue moving for a few more steps past the finish line so as not to slow down prematurely due to an obstacle. The test is performed in the shoes the patient normally wears.
The examining nurse: This test is necessary for us to see how you usually walk. Start here (the patient's feet are at the 'Start' mark). If you use a cane (or any other assistive device) and feel that you need it to walk this distance, you may use it. You should walk without stopping at your normal pace, as if you were walking down a hallway or outside. I will show you what I mean.
Demonstrate. Look forward and, maintaining an upright posture, walk at a normal pace to and past the finish line.
You will need to walk this distance three times. I will be right beside you. We will not talk while you are walking, but I will be there to support you so you do not fall.
The patient should stand without support at the starting line so that the toes of both feet touch the line or slightly cross it, standing at a comfortable distance from each other.
The first attempt is a practice run. During the second and third attempts, the time in seconds taken by the patient to walk 4 meters is measured. The best result is recorded.
3. Chair stands
Preparation: single chair stand. Chair without armrests.
The examining nurse: 'With this test, we will check the strength of your legs. Let me show you what you will do.'
Demonstrate and explain the procedure while sitting on a chair opposite the patient.
First, fold your arms across your chest or abdomen and sit so that your feet are flat on the floor. Then stand up while keeping your arms folded across your chest or abdomen.
If the patient cannot perform a single chair stand without using their arms, the 5-repetition chair stand test is not performed.
Test performance: five-repetition chair stand.
The examining nurse: please, now stand up five times in a row without stopping, as fast as you can. After each rise, you need to sit down and then stand up again. Your arms must be folded across your chest or abdomen. I will time the exercise.
The time taken by the patient to rise from the chair 5 times without using their arms is recorded. After the patient stands up for the fifth time (final position), stop the stopwatch.
Stop the test in the following cases:
- If the patient stands up using their arms.
- After one minute if the patient has not completed the test by that time.
- At your discretion, if necessary to ensure patient safety.
If the patient stops before completing 5 stands and appears fatigued, clarify by asking: 'Can you continue?' If the patient says 'Yes', continue the test. If the patient says 'No', stop and check the time on the stopwatch.
Key (interpretation):
Interpretation of Short Physical Performance Battery results
Points are awarded for each stage of the test (Fig. 1) and summed up. If the patient scores 10–12 points, there is no frailty; 8–9 points indicate prefrailty; 7 points or less indicate frailty. A score of 1 point or less in the balance test, and/or 5 seconds or more in the gait speed test, and/or 1 point or less in the 5-repetition chair stand test indicates a high risk of falls.
Figure 1. Short Physical Performance Battery
