List of Abbreviations
AVI — adenoviral infection
AKVK — adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis
AK — Acanthamoeba keratitis
BK — bacterial keratitis
IOP — intraocular pressure
HSV — herpes simplex virus
GK — herpetic keratitis
GrK — fungal keratitis
IK — infectious keratitis
ELISA — enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
CL — contact lenses
CT — computed tomography
ICD-10 — International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision
NIK — non-infectious keratitis
NK — neurotrophic keratitis
OCT — optical coherence tomography
NSAIDs — non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and antirheumatic drugs
PUK — peripheral ulcerative keratitis
DED — dry eye disease
EKC — epidemic keratoconjunctivitis
** — this symbol indicates a medicinal product used for indications according to its instructions for use
# — this symbol indicates a medicinal product used for indications not included in the instructions for use of the medicinal product.
Terms and Definitions
Keratitis is corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage.
Infectious keratitis is corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, initiated by the introduction of an infectious agent
Non-infectious keratitis is corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, developing against the background of various non-infectious pathological conditions.
Bacterial keratitis is corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, initiated by the introduction of a bacterial agent.
Herpetic keratitis is corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, initiated by corneal involvement with the herpes simplex virus (a DNA virus belonging to the human $\alpha$-herpesvirus family).
Adenoviral keratitis (epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, EKC) is corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, initiated by an adenoviral infection
Fungal keratitis is corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, initiated by the introduction of a fungal infection.
Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) is corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, initiated by protozoan infection of the genus Acanthamoeba.
Marginal keratitis (peripheral ulcerative keratitis) is immune-mediated inflammation of the corneal periphery, characterized by thinning and/or ulceration of the peripheral rather than central part of the cornea, spreading along its edge. It may be associated with an underlying local or systemic pro-inflammatory disease, or present in an idiopathic form.
Neurotrophic keratitis is corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, developing as a result of corneal neurotrophic disorder due to impaired innervation of various origins with decreased/absent sensitivity.
Keratitis in dry eye disease is corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, developing as a result of a multifactorial ocular surface disease characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis and accompanied by ophthalmological symptoms, in the development of which instability, tear film hyperosmolarity, inflammation and damage to the ocular surface, as well as neurosensory abnormalities play an etiological role.
Epitheliopathy — isolated punctate defects of the corneal epithelium that stain with fluorescein.
Corneal erosion is a superficial defect of the corneal epithelium of various shapes and areas, staining with fluorescein.
Corneal infiltrate — a local inflammatory focus containing activated keratocytes (corneal fibroblasts), inflammatory cells, inflammatory mediators, and microbes in infectious processes.
Epithelial edema — manifests as the loss of normal corneal luster, small epithelial vesicles may be defined. Bullae form in cases of moderate to severe edema. The cause of edema is usually corneal endothelial decompensation, as well as a sharp rise in IOP.
Hypopyon — accumulation of leukocytes in the inferior angle of the anterior chamber of the eye (may contain elements of an infectious agent).
Anterior synechiae — adhesions between the iris and the cornea.
Posterior synechiae — adhesions between the iris and the anterior lens capsule.
Keratic precipitates — aggregates of inflammatory cells deposited on the corneal endothelium.
Uveitis – an inflammatory disease of the middle coat of the eye (uvea).
1. Brief information on the disease or condition
1.1 Definition of the disease or condition
Keratitis is corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage [1;2].
1.2 Etiology and pathogenesis of the disease or condition (group of diseases or conditions)
By etiology, keratitis is divided into the following groups:
Infectious keratitis (IK):
· Bacterial
· Viral (Herpetic; Adenoviral)
· Fungal
· Acanthamoeba
Non-infectious keratitis (NIK):
· Marginal keratitis (peripheral ulcerative keratitis)
· Neurotrophic
· Keratitis in dry eye disease
Bacterial keratitis (BK) — corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, initiated by the introduction of a bacterial agent [2;3;4].
Herpetic keratitis (GK) — corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, initiated by corneal involvement with the herpes simplex virus (a DNA virus belonging to the human $\alpha$-herpesvirus family) [2-6].
Adenoviral keratitis (epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, EKC) — corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, initiated by adenoviral infection [2-4;7-9].
Fungal keratitis (GrK) - corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, initiated by the introduction of a fungal infection [2-4;10-12].
Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) — corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, initiated by infection with protozoa of the genus Acanthamoeba [2-4;12;13;14].
Marginal keratitis (KK) (peripheral ulcerative keratitis PUK) — immune-mediated inflammation of the corneal periphery, characterized by edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage of the peripheral rather than central part of the cornea and spreading along its edge. It may be associated with an underlying local or systemic pro-inflammatory disease, or present in an idiopathic form [2-4;15;16].
Neurotrophic keratitis — corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, developing as a result of a corneal neurotrophic disorder due to impaired innervation of various origins with decreased/absent sensitivity [2-4;17].
Keratitis in dry eye disease (filamentary keratitis) – - corneal inflammation characterized by corneal edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, with or without epithelial damage, developing as a result of a multifactorial ocular surface disease characterized by loss of tear film homeostasis and accompanied by ophthalmological symptoms, in the development of which instability, tear film hyperosmolarity, inflammation and damage to the ocular surface, as well as neurosensory abnormalities play an etiological role [2-4;18-20].
Pathogenesis of bacterial keratitis. The development of BK includes phases of bacterial adhesion, multiplication, penetration into the corneal stroma with the destruction of its architecture and melting of stromal collagen, release of bacterial toxins and lytic enzymes. The release of polymorphonuclear neutrophils from tears and limbal vessels, interleukins and cytokines, as well as free radicals, proteolytic enzymes, and matrix metalloproteinases lead to necrosis of the epithelium, Bowman's membrane, and stroma [1;2;21;22]. The development of BK is associated with the alteration of one or more systems of corneal anti-infective defense.
Pathogenesis of herpetic keratitis. Herpes simplex virus (HSV) is a common DNA virus belonging to the human alphaherpesvirus family. HSV enters the body by contact in early childhood. HSV invades epithelial cells, resulting in primary replication and cell death. Lymphocytes and macrophages migrate to the inflammation site, releasing biologically active substances and damaging capillaries and connective tissue, which leads to the formation of characteristic papules and vesicles. Next, HSV penetrates sensory nerve endings and travels via centripetal nerve fibers to paravertebral ganglia or cranial nerve ganglia. Viral replication occurs in neuronal nuclei. Via efferent nerve fibers, the virus reaches the skin and mucous membranes again, spreading and causing new rashes. Ocular involvement occurs via exogenous (through the epithelium), neurogenic, or hematogenous pathways; HSV actively replicates in corneal epithelial cells, subjecting them to necrosis due to the triggering of cytopathic and dystrophic processes. Afterwards, the virus enters a persistent state and can be detected in the cornea itself or the trigeminal ganglion for a prolonged period [1;2;23-26].
Pathogenesis of adenoviral keratitis (epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, EKC). Adenoviruses are double-stranded DNA viruses ranging from 80 to 110 nm in size, surrounded by a capsid containing group- and type-specific antigens; they are environmentally stable and resistant to many disinfectants. Adenoviral ocular infections are widespread, represent the most frequent cause of viral conjunctivitis, and manifest as simple follicular conjunctivitis, pharyngoconjunctival fever, or epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) with obligatory corneal involvement, which can become chronic and/or recurrent in ¼–½ of cases. During the development of EKC, infected keratocytes express chemokines that deposit on negatively charged areas of the corneal basement membrane, prompting the formation of subepithelial stromal infiltrates [1;2;9;27].
Pathogenesis of fungal keratitis. The development of FK is based on the infiltration of the corneal stroma by fungal microorganisms with their subsequent proliferation into the corneal thickness, which is accompanied by tissue necrosis and breakdown, resulting in a defect of the epithelium and the superficial and middle layers of the corneal stroma [1;2;28-30].
Pathogenesis of Acanthamoeba keratitis — Acanthamoeba exists as a metabolically active trophozoite or a dormant cyst. Trophozoites move actively using acanthopodia and reproduce by mitosis. The double-walled cyst is usually polygonal or stellate in shape with a wrinkled exocyst and a smooth endocyst. The ability to cause disease depends on the structural and enzymatic properties of Acanthamoeba, the principal one being the ability to form cysts—encystation. The cyst is resistant to extreme temperatures, standard disinfection systems, and radiation, exhibits osmotolerance, and has unlimited viability. Acanthopodia facilitate the binding of Acanthamoeba to biological and inert surfaces, while amoeboid movement, resembling that of macrophages, promotes tissue invasion via a paracellular pathway. Binding to a cell receptor disrupts host intracellular signaling pathways, causing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, which facilitates phagocytosis and toxin release [1;2;13;31;32].
Pathogenesis of marginal keratitis (peripheral ulcerative keratitis). Conditionally pathogenic microorganisms (S. aureus, Moraxella, Haemophilus, Streptococcus) take part in the development of MK by releasing toxins and leading to immune inflammation of the corneal periphery. Antigen exposure activates the adaptive immune response, the complement system, the production of specific antigen-antibody complexes, and the development of a severe local inflammatory reaction. Complement activation with the release of collagenases, proteases, and various cytokines stimulates keratocytes to produce matrix metalloproteinases and leads to stromal destruction with progressive corneal thinning [1;2;33;34].
Pathogenesis of neurotrophic keratitis. The development of NK is based on impaired corneal innervation, leading to a decrease in sensory and trophic functions, followed by decreased tear film stability, damage to the corneal epithelium and stroma with the formation of non-healing epithelial defects, and damage to Bowman's membrane. Subsequently, against the background of an increase in inflammatory mediators and activation of matrix metalloproteinases, the stroma becomes involved in the process [1;2;17].
Pathogenesis of keratitis in dry eye syndrome (DES). DES is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterized by the loss of tear film homeostasis and accompanied by ophthalmological symptoms, in the development of which the etiological role is played by instability, tear film hyperosmolarity, inflammation and damage to the ocular surface, as well as neurosensory changes. Insufficient tear fluid production and/or increased evaporation leads to altered corneal cell mitosis and impaired epithelial renewal, damage to Bowman's membrane, decreased mechanical protection, increased tear fluid osmolarity, an increase in inflammatory mediators, and activation of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) [1;2;19;20].
1.3 Epidemiology of the Disease or Condition
According to Rosstat, 111,506 cases of keratitis were registered in the Russian Federation in 2022, of which 103,653 cases were adult patients.
Bacterial keratitis — the most frequently encountered form of keratitis. In the United States, approximately 71,000 cases of microbial keratitis, including bacterial and fungal infections, are registered annually, which accounts for 12.9% of all corneal pathology. BK most commonly develops upon the introduction of Staphylococcus spp. (especially S. aureus), Streptococcus spp. (including S. pneumoniae and the viridans group), Pseudomonas spp. (P. aeruginosa is the dominant species), Enterobacteriaceae (including Serratia species, Klebsiella species, Citrobacter species, and Proteus species), and gram-negative cocci (including H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis) [21;22;35].
Herpetic keratitis. Globally, 1,000,000 new cases and 9,000,000 recurrent episodes of ocular HSV forms are registered annually. HSV is the cause of visual disability in 1,000,000 people worldwide every year. The incidence of HK in developed countries ranges from 10 to 30 per 100,000 population per year [25;36;37;38].
Adenoviral keratitis (epidemic keratoconjunctivitis, EKC). Adenoviral ocular surface disease is considered the most common cause of "red eyes" among the population of various countries worldwide [38]. Adenoviral ocular lesions account for up to 75% of all conjunctivitis cases globally, with approximately 20–30 million people suffering from HAdV-associated conjunctivitis annually [39]. EKC is usually associated with serotypes 8, 19, and 37. The most frequently encountered adenovirus serotypes affecting the ocular surface (in descending order of frequency) are: in Europe — 8, 3, 7, 19/37; in Japan — 8, 81, 4, 19/37, 3; in the USA — 8, 19, and 37 [40;41]. Nosocomial infection is most frequently associated with serotype 8 viruses [42].
Fungal keratitis. There are no exact statistics on the prevalence of fungal keratitis. At the same time, FK occurs in 50% of patients with confirmed bacterial keratitis [44], especially in tropical and subtropical regions. FK is more common in developing countries (China, India) than in developed countries (USA, Australia). According to researchers from India, 1,360 people with culture-confirmed fungal keratitis were monitored over a period of 10 years and 5 months [45]; according to data from China, 654 patients with FK were registered over a 6-year period [44]. At the same time, FK was noted in 56 eyes (56 patients) in Melbourne (Australia) and in 61 eyes (57 patients) in New York (USA) over 8-year and 16-year periods, respectively [44;45].
Acanthamoeba keratitis. AK is considered a rare disease included in the Orphanet database (ORPHA67043), and its prevalence is estimated at 1–9/100,000. The frequency of AK is 1% in India [46], while in countries with significant contact lens use, it is 4–8% [47] and affects approximately 20 patients per 1 million CL users per year [48].
Marginal keratitis (peripheral ulcerative keratitis). Associated with systemic autoimmune diseases — rheumatoid arthritis, systemic collagenoses, vasculitis, etc. The average incidence of MK varies from 0.2 to 3 patients per million population per year [49]. In 25% of cases, the development of MK is the manifestation of a systemic autoimmune disease [15].
Neurotrophic keratitis. Although neurotrophic keratoconjunctivitis (NK) is classified as a rare disease (ORPHA137596) with an estimated prevalence of less than 5 per 10,000 individuals, epidemiological data remain somewhat imprecise. NK develops in an average of 6% of cases following prior herpetic eye infection (prevalence 149 per 100,000) and in 12.8% of cases following H. zoster infection (prevalence 26 per 100,000). Furthermore, 2.8% of patients undergoing surgical procedures for trigeminal neuralgia suffer from NK. Given that the prevalence of trigeminal neuralgia is 1.5 per 10,000, the prevalence of NK as a consequence can be estimated at 0.02 per 10,000. NK frequently occurs secondary to other conditions such as diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, acoustic neuromas, etc. In such cases, statistical data are lacking and unavailable in the literature [17].
Keratitis in dry eye syndrome occurs in 5–35% of the adult population; women are affected more frequently, and the number of patients increases with age. Translating this to the population of Russia, 1.6 million women and 840 thousand men—a total of 2.5 million citizens—should suffer from this pathology. Moreover, dry eye syndrome (DES) affects children and adolescents: in Japan, DES was diagnosed in 4.3% of boys and 8% of girls aged 15–18 years [50].
1.4 Features of Coding the Disease or Condition
H16 – Keratitis
H16.1 – Other superficial keratitis without conjunctivitis
H16.2 – Keratoconjunctivitis (including caused by external agents)
H16.3 – Interstitial (stromal) and deep keratitis
H16.8 – Other forms of keratitis
H16.9 – Keratitis, unspecified
H17.1 – Other central corneal opacities
H17.8 – Other scars and opacities of cornea
H18.2 – Other corneal oedema
H18.3 – Changes in corneal membranes
H18.8 – Other specified disorders of cornea
H19.1* – Herpesviral keratitis and keratoconjunctivitis
1.5 Classification of the disease or condition
There are numerous classifications of keratitis based on etiopathogenesis, severity, localization of the inflammatory process, its depth and extent, clinical forms and phases, as well as the presence of complications such as hypopyon, etc. [17; 23; 51–56]
By etiology:
Bacterial keratitis.
Herpetic keratitis.
Adenoviral (epidemic) keratitis / keratoconjunctivitis.
Fungal keratitis.
Acanthamoeba keratitis.
Autoimmune (allergic) peripheral (marginal) keratitis.
Neurotrophic keratitis.
Keratitis in dry eye syndrome.
Herpetic keratitis. By depth of involvement: dendritic — involving the superficial epithelial layer of the cornea; geographic (amoeboid) — involving the superficial epithelial / subepithelial layer of the cornea; disciform — involving the corneal stroma [51; 52; 56].
Neurotrophic keratitis
According to the clinical classification of neurotrophic keratoconjunctivitis (NK) (neurotrophic keratopathy) [17; 57; 58], the development of NK is possible only in mild and moderate stages:
Stage 1 (mild) NK manifests as periodic development of xerosis and epithelial defects of varying severity (ranging from isolated punctate epitheliopathy to total confluent defects), with moderate corneal stromal edema. Prolonged progression of NK can lead to epithelial cell hyperplasia and limbal vessel vascularization.
Stage 2 (moderate) NK is characterized by the formation of more extensive and deeper corneal defects—micro- and macro-erosions, predominantly oval or round in shape, localized paracentrally in the upper half of the cornea. Depending on the depth of the defect, the pathological process may be accompanied by stromal edema and descemetocele.
1.6 Clinical presentation of the disease or condition
Clinical manifestations of keratitis depend on the etiology of the disease [1; 2; 12; 13; 17; 51–56].
Symptoms: Patients with keratitis of any etiology, except neurotrophic keratitis, present with: lacrimation, photophobia, foreign body sensation, pain, redness and swelling of the eyelids, eye redness, and decreased visual acuity.
In neurotrophic keratitis, due to decreased or absent corneal sensitivity, the main complaints presented by the patient are decreased visual acuity and eye redness.
Clinical signs of keratitis:
General nonspecific clinical signs of keratitis:
- discharge of various character (serous, mucous, mucopurulent, purulent)
- eyelid edema and hyperemia
- blepharospasm
- mixed injection of varying severity
- pericorneal injection of varying severity
- corneal stromal infiltration with epithelial defect(s)
- uveal signs
- hypopyon
Specific clinical signs of keratitis:
Infectious keratitis.
Bacterial keratitis: Distinctive symptoms include the presence of purulent or mucopurulent discharge in the conjunctival cavity, moderate to marked pericorneal injection, conjunctival chemosis, pronounced corneal stromal infiltration with epithelial defect(s), and frequently uveal signs and hypopyon. The formation of stromal infiltrate and overlying epithelial defects depends on the causative agent and takes varying amounts of time—from several hours to several days. Infiltrates in bacterial keratitis have a yellowish hue, or a rusty tint in cases of vascularization. The borders of the infiltrate are distinct, with areas of surface ulceration and stromal thinning. When the inflammatory process spreads to deeper structures of the eye, keratoiritis, keratoiridocyclitis, or keratouveitis develops, accompanied by the deposition of precipitates on the posterior surface of the cornea, the appearance of fibrin in the anterior chamber fluid, and hypopyon. In severe cases, a purulent corneal ulcer develops with a risk of perforation and other complications: purulent endophthalmitis, secondary glaucoma, subatrophy of the eyeball, and sympathetic ophthalmia.
Disease progression depends on the virulence of the pathogen and the host's defense capabilities. Thus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Neisseria gonorrhoeae cause rapid destruction of the corneal stroma. Other pathogens, such as staphylococci, streptococci, and pneumococci, lead to a slowly developing, localized focus of inflammation [1; 2; 4; 22; 55; 56].
Herpetic keratitis is a progressively developing disease. Examination reveals mild pericorneal and/or conjunctival injection. The cornea exhibits an epithelial defect in the form of dendritic lesions ending in "terminal bulbs," which extend deeper than the basement membrane and coalesce to form geographic lesions. The jagged or geographic borders of the defect distinguish herpetic keratitis from the smooth borders seen in neurotrophic keratitis. In areas of dendritic or geographic epithelial lesions, a decrease in sensitivity is observed in 80% of cases. Intact areas of the cornea retain normal sensitivity. In herpetic keratitis associated with herpes zoster, nearly complete corneal anesthesia is present [5; 6; 23; 24; 26].
Adenoviral (epidemic) keratoconjunctivitis develops against the background of adenoviral conjunctivitis on days 7–10 from disease onset. Examination reveals edema of the plica semilunaris and lacrimal caruncle. Eyelid edema and associated inflammatory ptosis are often observed only in the predominantly affected eye. Serofibrinous, sometimes mucopurulent exudate, redness, and edema (up to chemosis) of the bulbar and palpebral conjunctiva with follicular reaction. Petechiae and subconjunctival hemorrhages are formed. In cases of acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis, extensive epibulbar and tarsal hemorrhages may be noted. Small epithelial infiltrates form on the cornea, which progress to remain discrete or coalesce into subepithelial "nummular" lesions. Corneal sensitivity remains unaffected, which distinguishes epidemic keratoconjunctivitis from herpetic corneal involvement.
When infiltrates are localized within the visual axis, a decrease in visual acuity is noted. Numular opacities typically regress within a few weeks but can persist for years, causing irregular astigmatism [7–9; 27; 38; 41; 42; 59; 162].
Fungal keratitis
The clinical picture of fungal keratitis depends on the species of the pathogen. Clinical mycology distinguishes two main groups of fungi—molds (hyphal or filamentous) and yeasts. Of these, about 70 species can cause corneal lesions. Among filamentous fungi causing fungal keratitis, representatives of the genera Fusarium, Aspergillus (lightly colored, non-pigmented, or hyalohyphomycetes) and Curvularia (darkly colored, pigmented, or phaeohyphomycetes) are most common. The most frequent genus of yeast-like fungi causing fungal keratitis is Candida. Unlike bacterial keratitis, fungal infection develops slowly. Clinical manifestations are delayed by 10–20 days, during which fungal replication occurs before detection by the host organism. In infections caused by Fusarium species, clinical processes may proceed more rapidly.
At the onset of the disease, the epithelial defect may have a dendritic shape, which requires differential diagnosis with herpetic keratitis. The course of the disease is undulating: against the background of corneal improvement, in the absence of antifungal therapy, a sudden deterioration occurs—the area and depth of the infiltrate increase, and a hypopyon appears and progresses.
The clinical presentation of fungal keratitis depends on the species of fungi, but there are common features characteristic of most fungi: scalloped, serrated edges of the defect; protruding, dry, crumbly, or cheesy structured appearance of infiltrates and necrotic masses (representing fragments of cells, spores, and fungal mycelium); satellite (or shed) infiltrates; changes in the color of the affected area to any color other than white and yellow. Exudate deposits on the endothelium and the formation of immune rings (Wessely ring) in the cornea are less common. The hypopyon is pyramidal or dome-shaped, which can lead to a significant increase in intraocular pressure and the likelihood of further surgical intervention.
In the final stage, the infiltrate (corneal sequester) is rejected by the proliferating fungus. An intense opacity remains at the lesion site [10;11;12;29].
Acanthamoeba keratitis. Acanthamoeba causes keratitis with an undulating course, which, in the absence of early diagnosis and adequate treatment, can lead to severe visual impairment, up to blindness. Almost all patients report pain, eye redness, photophobia, decreased vision, tearing, and a foreign body sensation. Severe pain, disproportionate to the clinical manifestations, is considered characteristic of AK, but its absence does not rule out this diagnosis.
The disease develops in several stages: early stages show changes in the corneal epithelium followed by involvement of the superficial stromal layers, then its deeper layers, and finally, the pathognomonic ring infiltrate. The process takes from several weeks to several months. Clinical manifestations can be diverse; often the early stages of the disease are misdiagnosed as viral keratitis, and the late stages as bacterial or fungal keratitis.
Early manifestations of the disease include punctate epitheliopathy, epithelial or subepithelial infiltrates, and perineural infiltrates, occurring within a month of disease onset. After 1–2 months, the stroma becomes involved. Limbitis occurs in both early and late stages of the disease. Ulcer, anterior uveitis, hypopyon, endothelial edema, or corneal edema develop in the late stages of the disease [13;14;48].
Non-infectious keratitis.
Marginal keratitis (peripheral ulcerative keratitis)
Clinically, crescent-shaped grey-white infiltrates are recorded, localized at the corneal periphery with the formation of an epithelial defect followed by stromal thinning. The ulceration area increases concentrically. As the clinical condition progresses, the ulceration deepens up to perforation, which may close spontaneously. The formation of several separate foci that merge into a single focus is possible. Associated limbitis, scleritis, iritis, and iridocyclitis may develop. Corneal vascularization develops in the projection of peripheral infiltration with/without stromal involvement. The outcome is marginal corneal opacity with vascularization [15;16;49].
Neurotrophic keratitis
Patients with NK rarely complain of ocular symptoms; the most frequent reason for consulting an ophthalmologist in this group of patients is decreased visual acuity. Lagophthalmos may indicate seventh cranial nerve involvement, leading to corneal xerosis and affecting the clinical progression of NK. Ptosis may indicate third cranial nerve involvement. Clinical signs of conjunctival changes in NK patients are rare, despite the presence of corneal epithelial defects—bulbar conjunctival edema with the formation of parallel conjunctival folds associated with impaired tear production. The presence of a pronounced inflammatory reaction and discharge in the lower fornix may indicate secondary infection.
Corneal epithelial defects, their localization, and extent indicate the severity of NK as well as its progression. Most often, corneal changes are localized in the central zone, progressing from superficial punctate to total epitheliopathy as the condition worsens. Other corneal changes arising during the course of NK, such as neovascularization and opacity formation, may indicate previous acute inflammatory processes. The presence of posterior synechiae may be a sign of prior herpetic uveitis or keratouveitis.
The detection during biomicroscopy of a cellular reaction in the anterior chamber and the presence of fibrin or hypopyon in its aqueous humor may indicate the development of neuroinflammatory iritis, anterior uveitis, and concomitant infection [17;56;57].
Keratitis in dry eye syndrome
A slowly progressive disease, manifested by discomfort and a foreign body sensation, redness, and sometimes photophobia. Conjunctival hyperemia is mild or absent altogether. Punctate epitheliopathy (ranging from single to total) is recorded on the cornea, and micro- and macro-erosions may form. In later stages, filaments composed of dead epithelial cells and mucus form, attached at one end to the cornea and movable with blinking. At the base of the filament, a small epithelial defect staining with fluorescein can be found. Stromal edema and infiltration rarely occur [18;21;54;58].
Complications of keratitis.
The frequency and pattern of keratitis complications depend on the etiological form, duration and severity of the course, and the adequacy of diagnosis and treatment.
Possible complications of keratitis include:
· development of corneal ulcer with perforation/corneal melting;
· formation of anterior synechiae;
· formation of posterior synechiae up to pupillary occlusion;
· formation of prelenticular membranes up to seclusio pupillae;
· rubeosis (neovascularization) of the iris, hyphema;
· secondary ocular hypertension and glaucoma (with pre-angular, angular, pupillary, or malignant block), neovascular glaucoma;
· complicated cataract;
· hypotony and subatrophy of the eye;
2. Diagnostics, medical indications and contraindications for diagnostic methods
2.1 Complaints and Anamnesis
It is recommended to take an anamnesis and record complaints in eye pathology (A 01.26.001) in all patients with keratitis to establish or clarify the diagnosis [4;32;60;64].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments:
1. Complaints of tearing, photophobia, foreign body sensation, pain, redness and swelling of the eyelids, eye redness, decreased visual acuity.
2. In infectious keratitis:bacterial keratitis —main complaints of pain, discharge;herpetic keratitis- pain, photophobia, blurred vision, cutting pain in the eye;adenoviral keratitis— foreign body sensation, photophobia, blurred vision;fungal keratitis- decreased visual acuity, photophobia, pain, duration of the course;Acanthamoeba keratitis— severe pain disproportionate to the clinical picture, duration and undulating course.
3. In non-infectious keratitis:marginal keratitis (peripheral ulcerative keratitis- photophobia, tearing;neurotrophic keratitis — due to lack of sensitivity, main complaints of decreased visual acuity, eye redness;keratitis in dry eye syndrome - discomfort, foreign body sensation, sometimes photophobia.
4. When taking the history, attention should be paid to the onset of the disease—acute or gradual; what preceded the onset of the disease: trauma, contact lens wear, ocular surgeries, prolonged use and instillation of medications (especially antibacterials and glucocorticoids), seasonality. Presence of previous eye diseases in the anamnesis—whether the disease is initial or a recurrence. If a recurrence, what treatment was received previously.
5. Presence/absence of surgeries and trauma to the eye.
6. Allergy history. For children — and/or parents' allergy history.
7. The presence of general diseases diagnosed by specialists should be clarified, especially those accompanied by neurotrophic disorders of the eye and its adnexa, immunodeficiency states, and the use of immunosuppressive drugs.
2.2 Physical Examination
Physical examination is not recommended.
It is recommended to refer patients with concomitant systemic diseases to specialized professionals (general practitioner, rheumatologist, dermatovenereologist, pulmonologist, phthisiatrician, otorhinolaryngologist, infectious disease specialist, gastroenterologist, pediatrician) for consultation in order to clarify systemic and syndromic diseases, which is important for the patient's further management strategy [57].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: the choice of a specialist profile is determined based on the patient's suspected or confirmed systemic or syndromic disease and the risk of systemic complications.
2.3 Laboratory Diagnostics
Additional laboratory diagnostic tests are prescribed to clarify the diagnosis and to identify systemic and syndromic diseases associated with keratitis, which is important for the patient's further treatment strategy. The decision on the selection and prescription of additional laboratory tests is made following a baseline examination by an ophthalmologist and/or other specialists (rheumatologist, dermatovenereologist, allergist-immunologist, pulmonologist, general practitioner, pediatrician, hematologist, otorhinolaryngologist, urologist, obstetrician-gynecologist).
It is recommended to perform the laboratory test A26.25.001 Microscopic examination of conjunctival discharge for aerobic and facultatively anaerobic microorganisms [55;135;161-164].
GCR BLoE 3Level of Evidence B (Level of Confidence of Evidence – 3)
It is recommended to take a smear or scraping from the surface of the cornea and conjunctiva in all patients with infectious (bacterial, fungal) keratitis to determine the etiology of the disease, identify the type of pathogenic microorganism, and determine its susceptibility to antimicrobial drugs [55;135;161-164].
GCR BGrade of Recommendation B (Level of Evidence –
2.4 Instrumental Diagnostics
At the diagnosis stage and during follow-up examinations:
It is recommended to perform visometry in all patients with keratitis to detect decreased visual acuity and the possibility of its correction after recovery [2;56].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform refractometry or determine refraction using a trial lens set in all patients with keratitis during diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment monitoring to determine the best corrected visual acuity for an accurate assessment of the severity of visual impairments [2;56].
Comments: the feasibility of refractometry is determined by the location and extent of the corneal lesion, as well as the spread of the infection to deeper structures of the eye.
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform an external eye examination in all patients with keratitis to identify facial skin and eyelid changes, edema, asymmetry, and conditions associated with keratitis [2;17;56].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform biomicroscopy of the eye in all patients with keratitis to detect signs of inflammation, assess the transparency of optical media, and identify complications of keratitis in the anterior segment of the eye and the vitreous body [2;56].
It is recommended to perform fundus biomicroscopy (ophthalmoscopy) under conditions of pharmacological mydriasis in patients with keratitis to detect signs of inflammation of the retina, choroid, and optic nerve and/or identify complications of keratitis in the posterior segment of the eye when such changes are suspected [2;56].
Comments:
It is important to remember that the depth of the anterior chamber must be assessed before pharmacological pupil dilation.
Patients with adenoviral keratitis/keratoconjunctivitis are contagious and pose a risk of spreading adenovirus infection.
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to identify corneal surface defects and perform a fluorescein instillation test in all patients with keratitis to determine the area and depth of corneal surface defects, as well as the risk of complications such as corneal perforation [2;17;56].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform ophthalmodenometry (tonometry) in all patients with keratitis to diagnose IOP deviations from the norm (hypotony, ocular hypertension) [2;56].
Comments: Ophthalmodenometry (tonometry) is performed by palpation to minimize traumatic impact on the anterior segment of the eye in keratitis.
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform optical examination of the anterior segment of the eye using a computerized analyzer (optical coherence tomography (OCT)) in patients with keratitis for quantitative and qualitative assessment of corneal changes [61-64].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform ultrasonography of the eyeball (B-scan) in patients with keratitis to assess intraocular changes when optical media transparency is insufficient, as well as to detect orbital changes, and ultrasound biomicroscopy of the anterior segment of the eye to evaluate the state of the ciliary body [65].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended: To perform in vivo corneal confocal biomicroscopy [165-171].
Comments: The feasibility of in vivo corneal confocal biomicroscopy depends on the condition of the anterior segment of the eye, the technical equipment of the medical institution, and the availability of a qualified examiner.
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Differential diagnosis
Differential diagnosis is carried out with other visual system disorders characterized by the "red eye" syndrome: acute conjunctivitis, acute glaucoma attack, acute iridocyclitis, as well as with primary corneal dystrophy.
2.5 Other Procedures
It is recommended to perform aesthesiometry to determine the presence or absence of corneal sensitivity in patients with suspected neurotrophic keratitis [17].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
It is recommended to perform the Schirmer's test to determine tear production rates in patients with suspected keratitis in dry eye syndrome and neurotrophic keratitis [19;20;50].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
3. Treatment, including drug and non-drug therapies, diet therapy, and pain management
3.1 Conservative Treatment
The goal of treatment is to eliminate the pathogen, relieve active inflammation through local and systemic drug administration, achieve clinical recovery and/or long-term, preferably non-pharmacological remission, and preserve visual functions.
Treatment tactics are determined by the etiology of the inflammatory process, the risk of developing keratitis complications and decreased visual functions, the presence of associated systemic and syndromic pathology, and comorbid conditions.
Treatment of keratitis is carried out by an ophthalmologist; in the presence of an associated systemic or syndromic disease, in close collaboration with relevant specialists (rheumatologist, dermatovenereologist, allergist-immunologist, obstetrician-gynecologist, urologist, etc.).
General practitioners, in accordance with established etiological causes, conduct therapy in accordance with the Federal Clinical Guidelines for the treatment of the underlying disease, monitor the somatic status of patients and adverse events of systemic therapy.
Patients (or patients' parents) must be informed about the benefits and potential side effects of therapy.
It is recommended to prescribe local S01A - antimicrobial agents for adults and children in accordance with the instructions: S01AE fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin** according to the instructions is used in children from 1 year of age, ciprofloxacin** according to the instructions is used in children from 0, levofloxacin** according to the instructions is used in children from 1 year of age; S01AA antibiotics (netilmicin according to the instructions is used in children from 3 years of age; tobramycin according to the instructions is used in children from 2 months of age); S01AA Antibiotics (tetracycline** according to the instructions is used in children from 8 years of age); S01AA Antibiotics (erythromycin according to the instructions is used in children from 0); chloramphenicol according to the instructions is used in children from 4 weeks of age; S01AA20 Antibiotics in combinations with other agents (Colistimethate sodium+Tetracycline+Chloramphenicol according to the instructions is used in children from 8 years of age) for patients with keratitis (bacterial, fungal, acanthamoebic) or for suspected/prophylactic secondary bacterial infection in keratitis of other etiology with an antibacterial purpose [55;56;66;75].
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
Comments: local antibiotic therapy is recommended as etiotropic therapy for the treatment of bacterial, fungal, acanthamoebic keratitis or for suspected/prophylactic secondary bacterial infection in keratitis of other etiology with an antibacterial purpose.
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of the medicinal product: ofloxacin** 1-2 drops every 4-6 hours, ciprofloxacin** 1-2 drops every 4 hours, levofloxacin** 1-2 drops every 2 hours up to 8 times a day. The course of treatment may last 5-10 days [67-80].
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of the medicinal product: netilmicin 1-2 drops 3 times a day, tobramycin** 1-2 drops every 4 hours. The course of treatment may last 5-10 days [67-80].
Information on the route of administration dose, and duration of use of the medicinal product: tetracycline**, eye ointment, 0.5-1 cm 2-3 times a day. The course of treatment may last 5-7 days [67-80].
Information on the route of administration erythromycin, eye ointment, dose, and duration of use: 0.5-1 cm from 1 to 3 times a day. The course of treatment may last 5-10 days [67-80].
Information on the route of administration of the medicinal product chloramphenicol, dose, and duration of use: 1 drop every 3-4 times a day. The course of treatment may last 5-10 days [67-80].
Information on the route of administration of the medicinal product colistimethate sodium+ tetracycline+chloramphenicol**, eye ointment, dose, and duration of use: 0.5-1 cm from 3-4 times a day. The course of treatment may last 5-10 days [67-80].
It is recommended to prescribe topical antimicrobial agents S01AX – other antimicrobials (picloxydine, benzyldimethylmyristoylaminopropylammonium) for adults and children (according to instructions) with bacterial, fungal, acanthamoeba keratitis or in case of suspected/preventive secondary bacterial infection in keratitis of other etiology for antibacterial purposes [84-88].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: local antiseptic therapy is recommended as targeted therapy for the treatment of bacterial, fungal, acanthamoeba keratitis, or for suspected/preventive secondary bacterial infection in keratitis of other etiology for antiseptic purposes.
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of picloxydine: 1 drop 2 to 6 times/day for adults and 1 drop 6 times/day for children. The treatment course may last for 10 days [84-88].
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of benzyldimethylmyristoylaminopropylammonium: instillations of 1-2 drops 4-6 times/day. The treatment course may last for 5-14 days [84-88].
It is recommended to prescribe antiviral drugs (S01AD antivirals) interferon alfa-2b + diphenhydramine; #solanum tuberosum sprouts polysaccharides sum for adults and children (according to instructions) with infectious (herpetic, adenoviral) keratitis for antiviral purposes [89-96].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: local antiviral therapy is recommended as targeted therapy for the treatment of infectious keratitis (herpetic, adenoviral) for antiviral purposes.
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of interferon alfa-2b + diphenhydramine: 1-2 drops 6-8 times/day. As the inflammatory process resolves, the number of instillations is reduced to 2-3 times/day. The course of treatment lasts until the symptoms of the disease disappear [88-99].
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of #solanum tuberosum sprouts polysaccharides sum: 2 drops 4 times a day with an interval of 2 hours. The course of treatment is up to 15 days [88-99;162].
It is recommended to prescribe a topical antiviral agent (S01AD03) aciclovir** for adults and children (according to instructions) with infectious keratitis (herpetic) for antiviral purposes [101-110].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: local antiviral therapy is recommended as targeted therapy for patients with infectious keratitis (herpetic) for antiviral purposes.
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of aciclovir**, eye ointment: for adults and children, 1 cm 5 times a day. The course of treatment is continued until healing + 3 days after healing [102-110].
It is recommended to prescribe topical glucocorticosteroids (S01BA Corticosteroids) (dexamethasone 0.1%, according to the instructions for use, is contraindicated in children under 6 years of age; fluorometholone 0.1% eye drops, according to the instructions, are used in children from 2 years of age) for adults and children (according to instructions) with peripheral (marginal) keratitis for antiallergic and anti-inflammatory purposes [81-82;113-133].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Local anti-inflammatory therapy is targeted treatment in patients with peripheral (marginal) keratitis, as well as in pronounced inflammatory response in keratitis of other etiology.
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of dexamethasone 0.1%: According to the instructions: 1-2 drops 4-5 times a day for 2 days, thereafter the drug is used at 1-2 drops 3-4 times a day for 4-6 days. For children aged 6 to 12 years, 1 drop 2-3 times a day for 7-10 days [113-133].
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of fluorometholone 0.1%: 1-2 drops 2-4 times a day until inflammation symptoms decrease/disappear. The course of treatment is no more than 3 weeks [113-133].
When using topical glucocorticosteroids, monitoring of intraocular pressure is necessary to prevent its elevation, and monitoring of the anterior segment of the eye (corneal thickness) is required to avoid complications [113-133].
It is recommended to prescribe non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as eye drops (S01BC NSAIDs) for adult patients with keratitis for anti-inflammatory purposes (#diclofenac** 0.1%, contraindicated in patients under 18 years of age) [43;83;100;134;135].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of #diclofenac** 0.1%: 1 drop 4 times/day. The course of treatment may last from 3 to 4 weeks [43;83;100;134;135].
It is recommended to prescribe non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as eye drops (S01BC NSAIDs) (bromfenac 0.09%, contraindicated in patients under 18 years of age) for adult patients with keratitis for anti-inflammatory purposes [43;83;100;134;135].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: local NSAID therapy is recommended as symptomatic therapy for the treatment of keratitis with pronounced signs of inflammation.
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of bromfenac 0.09%: instillations of 1 drop 1-2 times a day for 1 to 2 weeks [134;135].
It is recommended to prescribe the antifungal agent (J02AA01) #amphotericin B** (0.15% solution) as local antifungal therapy for adults and children with fungal keratitis [136-143].
Level of recommendation evidence C (reliability level of evidence – 4)
Comments: Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of #amphotericin B** (0.15% solution) for adults and children: #amphotericin B** solution (1.5–3.0 mg per 1 ml of aqueous solution), into the conjunctival sac, 1 drop 4–6 times/day, 10–15 days. Topical drug administration is combined with subconjunctival injection of antifungal agents (prepared ex tempore): #amphotericin B** solution (0.1–0.5 mg in 0.5 ml of water for injections), subconjunctivally 1 time/day, 10–15 days [136-143, 177].
It is recommended to prescribe the antifungal agent (J02AC01) #fluconazole** (0.2% solution) as local antifungal therapy for adults and children with fungal keratitis[136-143;174-176].
GRC CLEL 4Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of #fluconazole** (0.2% solution) for adults and children: instillations of #fluconazole** 0.2% solution into the conjunctival sac, 1 drop 4–6 times/day, 10–15 days [136-143, 174-176].
It is recommended to prescribe the local antiseptic agent (D08AC02) #chlorhexidine** (0.02% solution) as local antifungal therapy for adults and children with fungal keratitis[136-143].
LoR CGoE 4Level of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 4)
Comments: in the absence of a manufactured ophthalmic form, it is prepared ex tempore by diluting a 0.05% aqueous solution of #chlorhexidine** to a 0.02% solution (with saline in a 2:3 ratio) [136-143, 178].
Information on the route of administration of the drug #chlorhexidine** (0.02% solution), dose, and duration of use: eye instillations of #chlorhexidine** 0.02% solution, 1 drop 5–6 times/day, 10–20 days [136-143, 178].
It is recommended to prescribe other ophthalmological drugs (S01XA) tissue repair stimulators of sulfated glycosaminoglycan for adults and children (according to instructions) with non-infectious keratitis to accelerate the epithelialization of corneal defects [6].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Instillations of sulfated glycosaminoglycan are prescribed to accelerate the epithelialization of corneal defects [144-145].
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of sulfated glycosaminoglycan: eye drops – instillations of 1-2 drops 4-5 times a day for 1 month.
It is recommended to prescribe other ophthalmological drugs (S01XA12) tissue repair stimulators of dexpanthenol for adults and children (according to instructions) with non-infectious keratitis to accelerate the epithelialization of corneal defects [144-145].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Instillations of dexpanthenol are prescribed to accelerate the epithelialization of corneal defects [150-151].
Information on the route of administration, dose, and duration of use of dexpanthenol: eye drops – instillations of 1 drop 4 times a day, as well as 1 drop at bedtime [144-145].
It is recommended to prescribe the ophthalmological agent (S01KA02) hypromellose** to adults and children (according to the instructions) with keratitis in dry eye syndrome to relieve dry eye symptoms or in keratitis of other etiologies accompanied by impaired tear production [144-145].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Instillations of hypromellose** are prescribed for replacement of the precorneal tear film and to accelerate epithelialization of corneal defects [144-145].
Information on the method of administration, dose, and duration of treatment with the medicinal product hypromellose**: eye drops — instill 1 or 2 drops 4–8 times a day into the lower conjunctival sac, or 1 or 2 drops every hour if necessary. Treatment duration is at least 2–3 weeks [144-145]. In children under 18 years of age, the drug should be used only if the expected benefit outweighs the potential risk.
It is recommended to prescribe the immunosuppressant cyclosporine (S01XA) to adult patients with keratitis in dry eye syndrome for anti-inflammatory purposes when tear replacement therapy is ineffective [18;21;54;58].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Cyclosporine instillations are prescribed as targeted therapy for non-infectious keratitis (keratitis in dry eye syndrome) when tear replacement therapy is ineffective [18;21;54;58].
Information on the method of administration, dose, and duration of treatment with the medicinal product cyclosporine: eye drops — instill 1 drop 1–2 times/day. Treatment duration is at least 2 months [18;21;54;58].
Comments: All drugs are prescribed taking into account age restrictions according to the instructions.
It is recommended to prescribe drugs with mydriatic action (tropicamide**, phenylephrine, atropine** (atropine** is contraindicated under 7 years of age), and in case of insufficient efficacy of instillations — #subconjunctival injections (phenylephrine — over 18 years of age, atropine** — over 7 years of age) to adults and children (according to the instructions) with keratitis complicated by uveal signs, at risk or with a tendency to form posterior synechiae to prevent their formation, development of pupillary block, and increased IOP [146-149].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: Information on the method of administration, dose, and duration of treatment with the medicinal product phenylephrine: phenylephrine is used in keratitis with iridocyclitis to prevent the development and rupture of already formed posterior synechiae and to reduce exudation into the anterior chamber of the eye as instillations of 1 drop 2–3 times a day; in case of insufficient efficacy in adults — #subconjunctivally 1% solution, 0.2 ml once [152-155;172;173]. Phenylephrine is contraindicated in children.
Information onстю the method of administration of the medicinal product phenylephrine: #subconjunctivally administered 0.1% phenylephrine solution 0.2 ml once.
Information on the method of administration, dose, and duration of treatment with the medicinal product atropine**: in patients over 7 years of age, #subconjunctivally 0.1% solution is administered at a dose of 0.2–0.5 ml [172;173]. Instillations of a 1% solution in patients over 7 years of age are performed 1–2 drops 2–3 times with a 6-hour interval.
It is recommended to prescribe local and systemic hypotensive therapy to adults and children (according to the instructions) with keratitis in case of increased IOP (ocular hypertension) caused by pre- and/or trabecular retention of intraocular fluid outflow in order to normalize intraocular pressure [146-149].
GCR CLEL 5Grade of Recommendation C (Level of Evidence – 5)
Comments: local therapy is prescribed as monotherapy or, in case of insufficient efficacy, as drug combinations. Drugs of choice are carbonic anhydrase inhibitors (#brinzolamide 1%, dorzolamide** 2%), beta-blockers (timolol** 0.25%, 0.5%, #betaxolol 0.5%), sympathomimetics for glaucoma treatment (brimonidine 0.15%, 0.2%).
Information on the method of administration, dose, and duration of treatment with the medicinal product #brinzolamide 1% (contraindicated in children), dorzolamide** 2%: 1 drop into the affected eye(s) 3 times a day, duration not exceeding 1–2 months.
Information on the method of administration, dose, and duration of treatment with the medicinal product brimonidine 0.15%, 0.2%: 1 drop 3 times a day with an interval of about 8 hours between administrations. According to the instructions, it is used in children from 2 years of age and weighing more than 20 kg.
Information on the method of administration, dose, and duration of treatment with the medicinal product #betaxolol 0.5%: in patients over 18 years of age, 1–2 drops 2 times a day, duration not exceeding 1–2 months.
Systemic antibacterial therapy (ATX group J01) may be prescribed to adults and children (according to the instructions) to resolve the bacterial process in keratitis [2;141;142].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence – 5)
It is recommended to prescribe systemic antiherpetic therapy (J05AB) to adults and children (according to the instructions) to resolve the viral process in keratitis of herpetic etiology or when activation of herpesvirus infection is suspected in keratitis of another etiology [150-153].
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence – 5)
Systemic NSAID therapy may be prescribed to adults and children (according to the instructions) to relieve inflammation and pain in keratitis [154-159].
Patients receiving NSAIDs require monitoring for potential adverse events: gastrointestinal tract lesions, nephrotoxicity, allergic reactions, hepatotoxicity, hematotoxicity, and others.
Systemic antifungal therapy (J02AC) is recommended for fungal keratitis or when a fungal coinfection is suspected in keratitis of other etiologies in adults and children (in accordance with the instructions) [136-143].
LeRR CLoE 4Level of recommendation confidence C (level of evidence – 4)
Comments: systemic antifungal therapy cannot be considered as monotherapy in the treatment of fungal keratitis due to low concentrations achieved in corneal tissues.
With prolonged systemic therapy, monitoring for potential side effects is necessary due to the potential nephro- and hepatotoxicity of these drugs.
# in the Russian Federation, most systemic antifungals lack official package insert indications for the treatment of ophthalmic mycoses. Prescribing these drugs is recommended for deep corneal stromal involvement and severe disease course [136-143].
3.2 Surgical Treatment
An indication for surgical treatment of keratitis is a long-standing non-healing ulcer refractory to medical therapy.
Amniotic membrane transplantation is recommended [160-161].
Level of recommendation C (evidence level – 5)
4. Medical Rehabilitation and Sanatorium-Resort Treatment
It is recommended to address the possibility of reconstructive optical surgeries on the eye in the remote period following keratitis with low visual function and development of late complications in order to achieve maximum visual acuity.
GDR CLE 5Grade of recommendation C (level of evidence – 5)
5. Prevention and Dispensary Observation
Compliance with sanitary and hygienic behavior norms among the adult and pediatric population is recommended for the prevention of keratitis.
Level of Evidence CGrade of Recommendation 5Level of Recommendation C (Grade of Evidence – 5)
6. Organization of Medical Care
Emergency medical care is provided in outpatient and inpatient settings.
Stages of medical care delivery
1. First medical aid
2. Outpatient
3. Inpatient
Medical indications for hospitalization in a medical organization
Elective hospitalization is carried out when conservative therapy under the constant supervision of an ophthalmologist is required, when there is a threat of complications, when outpatient treatment is not feasible, and for surgical treatment of keratitis.
Criteria for patient discharge from a medical organization: completion of the specialized medical care phase in an inpatient or day-hospital setting.
7. Additional Information
Currently, thanks to early detection and modern methods of medical and surgical treatment, the prognosis for keratitis is favorable in the majority of patients. The prognosis is largely determined by the etiopathogenetic form of the disease.
Predictors of a good functional prognosis are a mild course of the inflammatory process in the eye, as well as timely administration of local and systemic therapy.
Predictors of a poor functional prognosis are: a severe or persistent course of inflammation, development of keratitis complications, resistance to ongoing therapy, and a prolonged disease course.
Criteria for Evaluating the Quality of Medical Care
№ | Quality criteria | Performance evaluation |
|---|---|---|
1. | Visometry was performed | Yes/No |
2. | Ocular biomicroscopy performed | Yes/No |
3. | Fundus biomicroscopy and/or ophthalmoscopy under mydriasis was performed | Yes/No |
4. | Tonometry performed | Yes/No |
5. | Medical treatment was prescribed | Yes/No |
References
Show references
Lin A, Rhee MK, Akpek EK, Amescua G, Farid M, Garcia-Ferrer FJ, Varu DM, Musch DC, Dunn SP, Mah FS., American Academy of Ophthalmology Preferred Practice Pattern Cornea and External Disease Panel. Bacterial Keratitis Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2019 Jan;126(1):P1-P55.
Neroev V.V., Salmon J.F. Kanski's Clinical Ophthalmology: A Systematic Approach. 9th ed. Moscow: MEDpress-inform; 2023. 1028 p.
Gilani CJ, Yang A, Yonkers M, Boysen-Osborn M. Differentiating Urgent and Emergent Causes of Acute Red Eye for the Emergency Physician. West J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr;18(3):509-517.
Austin A, Lietman T, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Update on the Management of Infectious Keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2017 Nov;124(11):1678-1689.
Liesegang TJ. Herpes simplex virus epidemiology and ocular importance. Cornea 2001;20:1–13.
Young RC, Hodge DO, Liesegang TJ, Baratz KH. Incidence, recurrence, and outcomes of herpes simplex virus eye disease in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976-2007: the effect of oral anti- viral prophylaxis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:1178–83.
Adhikary AK, Banik U. Human adenovirus type 8: the major agent of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) J Clin Virol. 2014;61:477–86. doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2014.10.015.
Zhang L, Zhao N, Sha J, et al. Virology and epidemiology analyses of global adenovirus-associated conjunctivitis outbreaks, 1953-2013. Epidemiol Infect. 2016:1–12. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815003246
Butt AL, Chodosh J. Adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis in a tertiary care eye clinic. Cornea. 2006;25:199–202. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000170693.13326.fb.
Keay L., Gower E., Iovieno A., Oechsler R., Alfonso E., Matoba A., Colby K., Tuli S., Hammersmith K., Cavanagh D., Lee S., Irvine J., Stulting R., Mauger T., Schein O. (). Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Fungal Keratitis in the United States, 2001–2007: A Multicenter Study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(5):920-926.
Brown L, Leck AK, Gichangi M, Burton MJ, Denning DW. The global incidence and diagnosis of fungal keratitis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;21(3):e49-e57. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30448-5.
Vemuganti G., Garg P., Gopinathan U., Naduvilath T., John R., Buddi R., Rao G. Evaluation of agent and host factors in progression of mycotic keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(8):1538-1546. 10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01088-6.
Lorenzo-Morales J, Khan NA, Walochnik J. An update on Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. Parasite. 2015;22:10. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2015010. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
Raghavan A, Rammohan R. Acanthamoeba keratitis – A review. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr 1;72(4):473-482. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_2627_23. Epub 2024 Mar 8
Cao Y, Zhang W, Wu J, Zhang H, Zhou H. Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis Associated with Autoimmune Disease: Pathogenesis and Treatment. J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:7298026.
Ladas JG, Mondino BJ. Systemic disorders associated with peripheral corneal ulceration. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000 Dec;11(6):468-71.
Dua HS, Said DG, Messmer EM, Rolando M, Benitez-Del-Castillo JM, Hossain PN, Shortt AJ, Geerling G, Nubile M, Figueiredo FC, Rauz S, Mastropasqua L, Rama P, Baudouin C. Neurotrophic keratopathy. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018 Sep;66:107-131. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
Leonardi A, Flamion B, Baudouin C. Keratitis in Dry Eye Disease and Topical Ciclosporin A. Ocul Immunol Inflamm. 2017 Aug;25(4):577-586. doi: 10.1080/09273948.2016.1276933. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, Djalilian A, Dogru M, Dumbleton K, Gupta PK, Karpecki P, Lazreg S, Pult H, Sullivan BD, Tomlinson A, Tong L, Villani E, Yoon KC, Jones L, Craig JP. TFOS DEWS II Diagnostic Methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):539-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
Pearlman E, Sun Y, Roy S, Karmakar M, Hise AG, Szczotka-Flynn L, Ghannoum M, Chinnery HR, McMenamin PG, Rietsch A. Host defense at the ocular surface. Int Rev Immunol. 2013 Feb;32(1):4-18.
Gurnani B, Kaur K. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Jun 11, 2023. Bacterial Keratitis.Holland EJ, Schwartz GS. Classification of herpes simplex virus keratitis. Cornea. 1999 Mar;18(2):144-54. Doi: 10.1097/00003226-199903000-00002.
Darougar S, Wishart MS, Viswalingam ND. Epidemiological and clinical features of primary herpes simplex virus ocular infection. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985;69(1):2–6.
Liesegang TJ. Herpes simplex virus epidemiology and ocular importance. Cornea. 2001;20(1):1–13.
Tsatsos M, MacGregor C, Athanasiadis I, Moschos MM, Hossain P, Anderson D. Herpes simplex virus keratitis: an update of the pathogenesis and current treatment with oral and topical antiviral agents. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
Freyler H., Sehorst W. The fate of corneal infiltrations in cases of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis. A follow-up study over two and a half years. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 1976;88:341–343.
Kalkanci A., Ozdek, S. Ocular Fungal Infections. Current Eye Research. 2010;36(3):179-189.
Sudan R., Sharma Y.R. Keratomycosis: Clinical diagnosis, Medical and Surgical Treatment. JK Science. 2003;5(1):3-10.
Gopinathan U., Sharma S., Garg P., Rao G.N. Review of epidemiological features, microbiological diagnosis, and treatment outcome of microbial keratitis: experience of over a decade. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009; 57(4):273–279.
Panjwani N. Pathogenesis of acanthamoeba keratitis. Ocul Surf. 2010;8:70–9. doi: 10.1016/s1542-0124(12)70071-x.
Michalek M, Sönnichsen FD, Wechselberger R, Dingley AJ, Hung CW, Kopp A, et al. Structure and function of a unique pore-forming protein from a pathogenic acanthamoeba. Nat Chem Biol. 2013;9:37–42. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1116.
Kate A, Basu S. Systemic Immunosuppression in Cornea and Ocular Surface Disorders: A Ready Reckoner for Ophthalmologists. Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 03;37(3):330-344
McKibbin M, Isaacs JD, Morrell AJ. Incidence of corneal melting in association with systemic disease in the Yorkshire Region, 1995-7. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Aug;83(8):941-3
P. Parmar et al. Microbial keratitis at extremes of age. Cornea. 2006.Vol. 25, № 2. P. 153-158.
Astakhov Yu.S., Skryabina E.V., Konenkova Ya.S., Kasymov F.O., Bogomolova T.S., Pinegina O.N. Diagnosis and treatment of fungal keratitis. Oftal'mologicheskie vedomosti. 2013;6(2):75–80. (In Russ.)
Souza PM, Holland EJ, Huang AJ. Bilateral herpetic keratoconjunctivitis. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(3):493–496.
Sambursky R., Tauber S., Schirra F. et al. The RPS Adeno Detector for diagnosing adenoviral conjunctivitis. Ophthalmology. 2006. Vol. 113. P. 1758–1764.
Chandra N, Frängsmyr L, Imhof S, Caraballo R, Elofsson M, Arnberg N. Sialic acid-containing glycans as cellular receptors for ocular human adenoviruses: implications for tropism and treatment. Viruses. 2019;11:395. doi: 10.3390/v11050395.
Bialasiewicz AA, Schaal KP, ed. Infectious diseases of the eye. Philadelphia: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994. P. 309–316.
D’Angelo L.J., Hierholzer J.C., Holman R.C., Smith J.D. Epidemic keratoconjunctivitis caused by adenovirus type 8: epidemiologic and laboratory aspects of a large outbreak. Am J Epidemiol. 1981. Vol. 113. P. 44–49.
Andzhelov V.O., Maslova I.P., Rzhechitskaya O.V. Etiology, clinical presentation, and treatment of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis. Vestnik oftal'mologii. 1965;(5):18–23. (In Russ.)
Moshtaghion SM, Abolhosseini M, Yaseri M, Hosseini SB, Kanavi MR. Distribution, Prevalence, and Causative Agents of Fungal Keratitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (1990 to 2020). Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;43(8):3011-3022. doi: 10.1007/s10792-023-02689-z. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
Grinbaum A, Yassur I, Avni I. The beneficial effect of diclofenac sodium in the treatment of filamentary keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Jun;119(6):926-7. PMID: 11405858.
Gopinathan U, Sharma S, Garg P, Rao GN. Review of epidemiological features, microbiological diagnosis and treatment outcome of microbial keratitis: experience of over a decade. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57: 273–279.
Bharathi JM, Srinivasan M, Ramakrishnan R, Meenakshi R, Padmavathy S, Lalitha PN. A study of the spectrum of acanthamoeba keratitis: A three-year study at a tertiary eye care referral center in South India. Indian J Ophthalmol 2007;55:37–42.
Houang E, Lam D, Fan D, Seal D. Microbial keratitis in Hong Kong: Relationship to climate, environment and contact-lens disinfection. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2001;95:361–7.
Ross J, Roy SL, Mathers WD, Ritterband DC, Yoder JS, Ayers T, et al. Clinical characteristics of acanthamoeba keratitis infections in 28 states, 2008 to 2011. Cornea 2014;33:161–8.
Hassanpour K, H ElSheikh R, Arabi A, R Frank C, M Elhusseiny A, K Eleiwa T, Arami S, R Djalilian A, Kheirkhah A. Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis: A Review. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2022 Apr 29;17(2):252-275. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v17i2.10797. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
Stapelton F., Alves M., Bunya VY et al. TFOS DEWS II Epideniology Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):334-365.
Sarayar R, Lestari YD, Setio AAA, Sitompul R. Accuracy of artificial intelligence model for infectious keratitis classification: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 24;11:1239231. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1239231.
Liesegang TJ. Classification of herpes simplex virus keratitis and anterior uveitis. Cornea. 1999 Mar;18(2):127-43. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199903000-00001.
Bouheraoua N, Labbé A, Chaumeil C, Liang Q, Laroche L, Borderie V. Acanthamoeba keratitis. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2014 Oct;37(8):640-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
Kaercher T, Bron AJ. Classification and diagnosis of dry eye. Dev Ophthalmol. 2008;41:36-53. doi: 10.1159/000131069.
Jones DB. Decision-making in the management of microbial keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1981;88 (8):814–820. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(81)34943-4
Oftal'mologiya. Natsional'noe rukovodstvo / ed. by S.E. Avetisov, E.A. Egorov, L.K. Moshetova, V.V. Neroev, H.P. Takhchidi. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2019. 752 p. ISBN 978-5-9704-5125-0. (In Russ.)
NaPier E, Camacho M, McDevitt TF, Sweeney AR. Neurotrophic keratopathy: current challenges and future prospects. Ann Med. 2022 Dec;54(1):666-673. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2045035.
Mastropasqua L, Massaro-Giordano G, Nubile M, Sacchetti M. Understanding the Pathogenesis of Neurotrophic Keratitis: The Role of Corneal Nerves. J Cell Physiol. 2017 Apr;232(4):717-724. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25623. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
Kaufman H.E. Adenovirus advances: new diagnostic and therapeutic options. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2011. Vol. 22. P. 290–293.
Isakov V.A., Isakov D.V. Pathogenesis and therapy of socially significant viral infections (herpes and papillomavirus infections). Klinicheskaya farmakologiya i terapiya. 2014;23(1). (In Russ.)
Cohen S, Tucker Y, Guttman S, Bubis E, Rubinstein Y, Skaat A, Sher I, Rotenstreich Y. Anterior-Segment Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Measurement Of A Melting Ulcer For Follow-Up Of Corneoscleral Thinning Progression. Int Med Case Rep J. 2019 Nov 7;12:335-338. doi: 10.2147/IMCRJ.S219132. ECollection 2019.
Bonnet C, Debillon L, Al-Hashimi S, Hoogewoud F, Monnet D, Bourges JL, Brézin A. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography imaging in peripheral ulcerative keratitis, a corneal structural description. BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 May 25;20(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01466-1. Oliveira MA, Rosa A, Soares M, Gil J, Costa E, Quadrado MJ, Murta J. Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography in the Early Management of Microbial Keratitis: A Cross-Sectional Study. Acta Med Port. 2020 May 4;33(5):318-325. doi: 10.20344/amp.12663. Epub 2019 Oct 2.
Soliman W, Fathalla AM, El-Sebaity DM, Al-Hussaini AK. Spectral domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography in microbial keratitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;251(2):549-53. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2086-5. Epub 2012 Jun 24.
Keay L., Gower E., Iovieno A., Oechsler R., Alfonso E., Matoba A., Colby K., Tuli S., Hammersmith K., Cavanagh D., Lee S., Irvine J., Stulting R., Mauger T., Schein O. Clinical and Microbiological Characteristics of Fungal Keratitis in the United States, 2001–2007: A Multicenter Study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(5):920-926.
Ul'trazvukovye issledovaniya v oftal'mologii. Rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. Ed. by V.V. Neroev, T.N. Kiseleva. Moscow: Ikar; 2019. 324 p. (In Russ.)
Dunlop A.A., Wright E.D., Howlader S.A., Nazrul I., Husain R., McClellan K., Billson F.A. Suppurative corneal ulceration in Bangladesh: a study of 142 cases, examining the microbiological diagnosis, clinical and epidemiological features of bacterial and fungal keratitis. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1994;22(2):105–110. DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.1994.tb00775.x
Kalkanci A., Ozdek, S. Ocular Fungal Infections. Current Eye Research. 2010;36(3):179-189. DOI: 10.3109/02713683.2010.533810
Mulgund U.S., Shankar M.R., Kumar C.S.S. Patterns of presentation of fungal keratitis in tertiary care hospital. J Evid Based Med Health. 2017;4(83):4906-4911. DOI: 10.18410/jebmh/2017/978
Bharathi M.J., Ramakrishnan R., Vasu S., Meenakshi R., Palaniappan R. Epidemiological characteristics and laboratory diagnosis of fungal keratitis. A three-year study. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2003;51(4):315–321.
Srinivasan M. Fungal keratitis. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2004;15(4):321–327. DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200408000-00008.
Gajjar DU, Pal AK, Ghodadra BK, Vasavada AR. Microscopic Evaluation, Molecular Identification, Antifungal Susceptibility, and Clinical Outcomes in Fusarium, Aspergillus and, Dematiaceous Keratitis. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:605308. DOI: 10.1155/2013/605308.
Thomas P.A. Mycotic keratitis – an underestimated mycosis. J Med Vet Mycol. 1994;32(4):235–256. DOI: 10.1080/02681219480000321.
Malhotra S, Sharma S, Kaur N, Hans C Fungal Keratitis-A Brief Overview. J Ophthalmic Clin Res. 2015;2(3):18–22. DOI: 10.24966/ocr-8887/100018
Rosa R.H. Jr, Miller D., Alfonso E.C. The changing spectrum of fungal keratitis in south Florida. Ophthalmology. 1994;101(6):1005-1013. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31225-5
Wallang B.S., Das S., Sharma S., Sahu S.K., Mittal R. Ring Infiltrate in Staphylococcal Keratitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(1):354–355. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02191-12
Mascarenhas J., Lalitha P., Prajna N.V. Acanthamoeba, fungal, and bacterial keratitis: a comparison of risk factors and clinical features. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(1):56–62. DOI:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.032
Barash A., Chou T.Y. Moraxella atlantae keratitis presenting with an infectious ring ulcer. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2017;7:62-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2017.06.003.
Ganegoda N., Rao S.K. Antifungal therapy for keratomycoses. Antifungal therapy for keratomycoses. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2004;5(4):865-874. DOI: 10.1517/14656566.5.4.865.
Xu L.J., Song X.S., Zhao J., Sun S.Y., Xie L.X. Hypopyon in patients with fungal keratitis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012;125(3):470-475.
Punia R.S., Kundu R., Chander J., Arya SK., Handa U., Mohan H. Spectrum of fungal keratitis: clinicopathologic study of 44 cases. Int J Ophthalmol. 2014;7(1):114-117. DOI: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.01.21.
Hassanpour K, H ElSheikh R, Arabi A, R Frank C, M Elhusseiny A, K Eleiwa T, Arami S, R Djalilian A, Kheirkhah A. Peripheral Ulcerative Keratitis: A Review. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2022 Apr 29;17(2):252-275. doi: 10.18502/jovr.v17i2.10797. eCollection 2022 Apr-Jun.
Robin JB, Schanzlin DJ, Verity SM, Barron BA, Arffa RC, Suarez E, et al. Peripheral corneal disorders. Surv Ophthalmol. 1986;31:1–36. doi: 10.1016/0039-6257(86)90049-4.
Messmer EM, Foster CS. Destructive corneal and scleral disease associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Medical and surgical management Cornea. 1995;14:408–417. doi: 10.1097/00003226-199507000-00010.
Trousdale MD, Barlow WE, McGuigan LJ. Assessment of diclofenac on herpes keratitis in rabbit eyes. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989 Nov;107(11):1664-6. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070020742039. PMID: 2554866.
Maychuk Yu.F. Eye infections. Practical guide to infectious chemotherapy. Moscow; 2002:225-230. (In Russ.)
Khalatyan A.S., Budzinskaya M.V., Kholina E.G., Strakhovskaya M.G., Shevlyagina N.V., Zhukhovitskiy V.G. Bactericidal effect of picloxydine on Staphylococcus epidermidis strains isolated from the conjunctiva against the background of intravitreal injections. Sovremennye tekhnologii v oftal'mologii. 2019;(1):315-320. (In Russ.)
Grzybowski A., Brona P., Kim S.J. Microbial flora and resistance in ophthalmology: a review // Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. – 2017. – 255. – 851-862.
Kim S.J., Toma H.S. Antimicrobial resistance and ophthalmic antibiotics: 1-year results of a longitudinal controlled study of patients undergoing intravitreal injections // Arch Ophthalmol. – 2011. – 129. – 1180-1188.
Sergey V. Stovbun, Tatiana S. Kalinina, Dmitry V. Zlenko, Aleksei V. Kiselev, Alexander A. Litvin, Alexander A. Bukhvostov, Sergey V. Usachev, Dmitry A. Kuznetsov. Antiviral potential of plant polysaccharide nanoparticles actuating non-specific immunity. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 182 (2021) 743–749.
Kalinina T.S., Zlenko D.V., Kiselev A.V., Litvin A.A., Stovbun S.V. Antiviral effect of high-molecular-weight plant-derived polysaccharides (Panavir®). International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2020;161:936-938.
Alimbarova L.M., Lazarenko A.A., Kiselev A.V., Stovbun E.V., Bagaeva M.I., Petryanina E.V. Evaluation of the efficacy of Solanum Tuberosum shoot extract in experimental ocular herpes. Vestnik oftal'mologii. 2015;(3):62-67. (In Russ.)
Sergienko V.I. Antiviral properties of the drug "Panavir". Moscow; 2005. (In Russ.)
Yani E.V., Kamenskikh T.G., Zubkova T.G., Seliverstova K.E., Pozdnyakova V.V., Stupakova M.M. Efficacy of a new plant-derived antiviral drug in eye drops for the combination therapy of ocular herpes. Rossiyskiy oftal'mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2023;16(3):1104-1110. (In Russ.)
Yani E.V., Pozdnyakova V.V., Seliverstova K.E. Efficacy of the antiviral and immunotropic drug Interferon-Ophthalmo in the therapy of adenoviral ocular infections. Rossiyskiy oftal'mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2023;16(1):112-118. (In Russ.)
Surov A.V., Medvedeva M.V., Sagirova S.F., Konstantinova T.N., Gabatova L.V., Moroz O.G. The use of a combined interferon alfa-2b preparation in the complex therapy of herpetic keratitis in patients after coronavirus infection. Rossiyskiy oftal'mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2023;16(2):7-11. (In Russ.)
Maychuk Yu.F. Optimization of ocular surface therapy. Ophthalmoferon. Moscow; 2010. 115 p. (In Russ.)
Klimova R.R. et al. Effect of Panavir on the synthesis of herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2 proteins in cell culture. Antibiotiki i khimioterapiya. 2009;54(3–4):18–20. (In Russ.)
Guidance for industry antiviral product development - conducting and submitting virology studies to the agency [Electronic resource] // Food and drug administration. 2006. URL: https://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/05d-0183-gdl0002-01.pdf.
Yani E.V., Kamenskikh T.G., Veselova E.V. et al. Efficacy of an interferon inducer in the complex therapy of ocular herpes. Results of a clinical study. Rossiyskiy oftal'mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2023;16(3):104-109. (In Russ.)
Zumbulidze N.G., Khokkanen V.M., Litvin I.B. Experience in the use and evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of a para-aminobenzoic acid-based medicinal product in the complex therapy of herpesvirus conjunctivitis and keratitis. Oftal'mologiya. 2022;19(4):864-874. (In Russ.)
van Husen H. Lokale Behandlung mit Diclofenac-Na-Augentropfen bei Erkrankungen der vorderen Augenabschnitte [Local treatment with diclofenac-Na eyedrops in diseases of the anterior eye segment]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1986 Jun;188(6):615-9. German. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1050730. PMID: 3761968.
Ohashi Y. Treatment of herpetic keratitis with acyclovir: benefits and problems. Ophthalmologica. 1997;211 Suppl 1:29-32. doi: 10.1159/000310883.
Collum LM, Logan P, Ravenscroft T. Acyclovir (Zovirax) in herpetic disciform keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983 Feb;67(2):115-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.67.2.115.
Hermans PE, Cockerill FR. Antiviral agents. 3rd. Mayo Clin Proc. 1987 Dec;62(12):1108-15. doi: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)62505-1.
Shiota H. Clinical evaluation of acyclovir in the treatment of ulcerative herpetic keratitis. Am J Med. 1982 Jul 20;73(1A):307-10. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(82)90112-7.
Vikulov G.Kh., Oradovskaya I.V., Kolobukhina L.V. Herpesvirus infections in children: prevalence, incidence, clinical forms, management algorithms. Voprosy prakticheskoy pediatrii. 2022;17(6):126-141. (In Russ.)
Müller L, Vrensen G, Pels L, Cardozo BN, Willekens B. Architecture of human corneal nerves. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:985–994.
Yani E.V., Seliverstova K.E. Conservative treatment of neurotrophic keratitis. Meditsinskiy sovet. 2017;(5):162-166. (In Russ.)
Kasparova E.A., Sobkova O.I. Neurotrophic keratitis against the background of paralytic lagophthalmos. Oftal'mologiya. 2009;6(2):11-14. (In Russ.)
Li JY. Herpes zoster ophthalmicus: acute keratitis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;29(4):328-333. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000491.
Zemba M, Burcea M, Camburu G. Atopic keratoconjunctivitis with corneal ulcer. Case report. Rom J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul-Sep;60(3):200-206.
Shuler JD, Levenson J, Mondino BJ. Inferior corneal ulcers associated with palpebral vernal conjunctivitis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988 Jul 15;106(1):106-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76405.
Zyryanov S.K., Butranova O.I. Topical glucocorticosteroids in ophthalmology: a comparative analysis of efficacy and safety. Rossiyskiy oftal'mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2023;16(2):166-172. (In Russ.)
Khazamova A.I., Yani E.V., Verigo E.N., Chentsova E.V. Modern aspects of the treatment of ulcerative corneal lesions. Evraziyskiy soyuz uchenyh. 2016;2(23):99-106. (In Russ.)
Neroev V.V., Slepova O.S., Kovaleva L.A., Krichevskaya G.I. Optimization of etiological diagnosis and increasing the effectiveness of treatment of infectious corneal ulcers of central localization. Rossiyskiy oftal'mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2017;10(3):56-61. (In Russ.)
Kovaleva L.A., Kulikova I.G., Balatskaya N.V. Central bacterial and herpetic corneal ulcers of protracted course: the role of the autoimmune component in disease chronicization. Tochka zreniya. Vostok – Zapad. 2018;(4):30-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25276/2410-1257-2018-4-30-32. (In Russ.)
Neroev V.V., Katargina L.A., Kovaleva L.A., Krichevskaya G.I., Balatskaya N.V., Kulikova I.G. Central bacterial corneal ulcers of protracted course. Immunological aspects and tactics of etiopathogenetic treatment. Rossiyskiy oftal'mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2019;12(1):43-49. (In Russ.)
Neroev V.V., Yani E.V., Golikova V.A., Pozdnyakova V.V. Evaluation of conservative treatment regimens for bacterial corneal ulcers using a glucocorticosteroid drug in experiment. Rossiyskiy oftal'mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2020;13(2):71-77. (In Russ.)
Neroev V.V., Khoroshilova-Maslova I.P., Yani E.V., Golikova V.A. Effect of corticosteroid therapy on the scarring process of a bacterial corneal ulcer. Rossiyskiy oftal'mologicheskiy zhurnal. 2020;13(3):61-68. (In Russ.)
Yani E.V., Golikova V.A. Features of anti-inflammatory therapy for bacterial corneal ulcers. Vestnik oftal'mologii. 2020;136(6):205–210. (In Russ.)
Yani E.V., Golikova V.A. A comprehensive approach to the therapy of corneal ulcers. Oftal'mologiya. 2020;17(4):796-803. (In Russ.)
Yu JG, Bao FJ, Joda A, Fu XA, Zhou S, Wang J, Hu XL, Wang QM, Elsheikh A. Influence of glucocorticosteroids on the biomechanical properties of in-vivo rabbit cornea. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Jan;29:350-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
Den S., Sotozono C., Kinoshita S., and Ikeda T. Efficacy of early systemic betamethasone or cyclosporin A after corneal alkali injury via inflammatory cytokine reduction. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2004; 82: 195–199.
Yi K., Chung T.Y., Hyon J.Y. et al. Combined treatment with antioxidants and immunosuppressants on cytokine release by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells—chemically injured keratocyte reaction. Mol Vis. 2011; 17: 2665–2671.
Williams R.N. and Paterson C.A. The influence of topical corticosteroid therapy upon polymorphonuclear leukocyte distribution, vascular integrity and ascorbate levels in endotoxin-induced inflammation of the rabbit eye. Exp Eye Res. 1987.
Carmichael T.R., Gelfand Y., Welsh N.H. Topical steroids in the treatment of central and paracentral corneal ulcers. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74(9):528–531.
Srinivasan M., Lalitha P., Mahalakshmi R. Corticosteroids for bacterial corneal ulcers. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(2):198–202
Hindman H.B., Patel S.B., Jun A.S. Rationale for adjunctive topical corticosteroids in bacterial keratitis. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(1):97–102.
Wilhelmus K.R. Indecision about corticosteroids for bacterial keratitis: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(5):835–842
Ohadi C., Litwin K.L., Moreira H. Anti-inflammatory therapy and outcome in a guinea pig model of Pseudomonas keratitis. Cornea. 1992;11(5):398–403.
Badenoch P.R., Hay G.J., McDonald P.J., Coster D.J. A rat model of bacterial keratitis: effect of antibiotics and corticosteroid. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(5):718–722.
Fel A., Aslangul E., Le Jeunne C. Eye and corticosteroid's use. Presse Med, 2012, 41, 414-421.Schechter BA, Trattler W. Efficacy and safety of bromfenac for the treatment of corneal ulcer pain. Adv Ther. 2010 Oct;27(10):756-61. doi: 10.1007/s12325-010-0066-x. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
Schalnus R. Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy in ophthalmology. Ophthalmologica. 2003 Mar-Apr;217(2):89-98. Doi: 10.1159/000068563.
Jones J, Francis P. Ophthalmic utility of topical bromfenac, a twice-daily nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2009 Oct;10(14):2379-85. Doi: 10.1517/14656560903188425.
Aleksandrova O.I., Okolov I.N., Khorol'skaya Yu.I., Panova I.E., Blinova M.I. Effect of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory eye drops on human corneal and conjunctival epithelial cells in vitro. Oftal'mologiya. 2017;14(3):251-259. (In Russ.)
Obrubov A.S., Belskaya K.I. Pharmacotherapy of fungal keratitis (literature review). Oftal'mokhirurgiya. 2018;(1):98-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25276/0235-4160-2018-1-98-102. (In Russ.)
Obrubov A.S. Evolution of domestic views and experience of local pharmacotherapy of fungal keratitis. Rossiyskaya detskaya oftal'mologiya. 2022;(2):39-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25276/2307-6658-2022-2-39-47. (In Russ.)
Egorov E.A., Alekseev V.N., Astakhov Yu.S. et al. Rational pharmacotherapy in ophthalmology: A guide for practicing physicians. Ed. by E.A. Egorov. Moscow: Litterra; 2004. (In Russ.)
Handbook of Ophthalmology. Avetisov E.S., Fradkin M.Ya., Vilenkina A.Ya. Ed. by A.V. Roslavtsev. Moscow: Meditsina; 1967. 556 p. (In Russ.)
Handbook of Ophthalmology. Avetisov E.S., Katsnelson L.A., Maychuk Yu.F. et al.; Ed. by E.S. Avetisov. Moscow: Meditsina; 1978. 382 p. (In Russ.)
Morozov V.I., Yakovlev A.A. Pharmacotherapy of eye diseases: a reference book. Moscow; 1982, 1989, 1998, 2001, 2004. (In Russ.)
Egorov E.A., Astakhov Yu.S., Stavitskaya T.V. Ophthalmic pharmacology. Moscow: GEOTAR-MED; 2004, 2005, 2009. (In Russ.)
Keratomycoses (diagnosis, clinical presentation, treatment, and prevention): Guidelines. Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases; [Comp. by Yu.F. Maychuk et al.]. Moscow; 1986. 11 p. (In Russ.)
Yani E.V., Seliverstova K.E. Conservative treatment of neurotrophic keratitis. Meditsinskiy sovet. 2017;(5):162-166. (In Russ.)
Brzheskiy V.V., Drozdova E.A., Bobryshev V.A., Berdnikova E.V., Golubev S.Yu. New possibilities of reparative therapy for dry eye syndrome. Vestnik oftal'mologii. 2024;140(1):58-64. DOI: 10.17116/oftalma202414001158. (In Russ.)
Garcia Del Valle I., Alvarez-Lorenzo C. Atropine in topical formulations for the management of anterior and posterior segment ocular diseases. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2021;18(9):1245-1260.
Onishchenko A.L., Kolbasko A.V., Chernysheva A.D. Features of treatment of fibrinous-plastic anterior uveitis. Oftal'mologiya. 2015;12(2):54-58. (In Russ.)
Ustinova E.I. Uveal (inflammatory and post-inflammatory) glaucoma (pathogenesis, clinical presentation, classification, treatment). Oftal'mologicheskie vedomosti. 2009;(2). (In Russ.)
Israpfilova G.Z. et al. A case of Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome. Issue 2. 2015:37. (In Russ.)
Hung SO, Patterson A, Clark DI, Rees PJ. Oral acyclovir in the management of dendritic herpetic corneal ulceration. Br J Ophthalmol. 1984 Jun;68(6):398-400. doi: 10.1136/bjo.68.6.398.
Falcon MG. Rational acyclovir therapy in herpetic eye disease. Br J Ophthalmol. 1987 Feb;71(2):102-6. doi: 10.1136/bjo.71.2.102.
Barron BA, Gee L, Hauck WW, Kurinij N, Dawson CR, Jones DB, Wilhelmus KR, Kaufman HE, Sugar J, Hyndiuk RA, et al. Herpetic Eye Disease Study. A controlled trial of oral acyclovir for herpes simplex stromal keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1994 Dec;101(12):1871-82. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(13)31155-5.
Oral acyclovir for herpes simplex virus eye disease: effect on prevention of epithelial keratitis and stromal keratitis. Herpetic Eye Disease Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Aug;118(8):1030-6.
Miserocchi E., Pontikaki I, Modorati G. Anti-CD 20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab) treatment for inflammatory ocular diseases. Autoimmun Rev.2011;11(1): 35-9. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2011.07.001.
Bucolo C, Maltese A, Puglisi G, Pignatello R. Enhanced ocular anti-inflammatory activity of ibuprofen carried by an Eudragit RS100 nanoparticle suspension. Ophthalmic Res. 2002 Sep-Oct;34(5):319-23. doi: 10.1159/000065608.
Roy IS, Das A, Roy M. A comparative study of ibuprofen with paracetamol versus oxyphenbutazone with analgin combination in ophthalmic practice. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1988 Jan-Mar;36(1):37-40.
Zhuravleva M.V. Topical issues of the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: focus on the safety of nimesulide. Nevrologiya i revmatologiya. Supplement to Consilium Medicum. 2012;(2):95-100. (In Russ.)
Cruz R, Quintana-Hau JD, González JR, Tornero-Montaño R, Baiza-Durán LM, Vega L. Effects of an ophthalmic formulation of meloxicam on COX-2 expression, PGE2 release, and cytokine expression in a model of acute ocular inflammation. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jan;92(1):120-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.125179.
Chentsova E.V., Verigo E.N., Khazamova A.I. Differentiated approach to the complex treatment of corneal ulcers. Oftal'mologiya. 2018;15(3):256-263. DOI: 10.18008/1816-5095-2018-3-256-263. (In Russ.)
Trufano S.V., Shakhbazyan N.P., Zaytsev A.V., Rozinova V.N. Surgical methods for the treatment of infectious keratitis. Vestnik oftal'mologii. 2021;137(4):128-135. DOI: 10.17116/oftalma2021137041128. (In Russ.)
Kleshcheva E.A. Clinical course of acute adenoviral conjunctivitis with various forms of drug therapy. Klinicheskaya oftal'mologiya. 2025;25(1):60-65. DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729-2025-25-1-9. (In Russ.)
M.A. Sharshkova, L.A. Deev. Results of bacteriological examination in patients with keratitis. Klinicheskaya mikrobiologiya i antimikrobnaya khimioterapiya. 2012; 14(3).
Maychuk Yu.F. Algorithms for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis and keratitis. Spravochnik poliklinicheskogo vracha. 2005; 4:73-6.
Rocha G.A., Silva R.F., Lopes M.F., Pereira N.C., Sousa L.B. Main pathogens and in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility in bacterial keratitis: 5-year study, 2005-2009. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2011; 1:28-32
K.I. Belskaya, A.S. Obrubov. Pathogenesis and clinical features of fungal keratitis (literature review). Oftal'mologiya. 2021;18(1):12–19; doi.org/10.18008/1816-5095-2021-1-12-19.
Szentmáry N, Daas L, Matoula P, Goebels S, Seitz B. Acanthamoeba keratitis
Ophthalmologe. 2013 Dec;110(12):1203-10; quiz 1211. doi: 10.1007/s00347-013-2981-0.
Maĭchuk IuF, Maĭchuk DIu. Clinical forms of acanthamoeba keratitis as viewed from the standpoint of biomicroscopy and confocal microscopy. Vestn Oftalmol. 2004 Jan-Feb;120(1):45-7.
Hsiao YC, Tsai IL, Kuo CT, Yang TL.Diagnosis of microsporidial keratitis with in vivo confocal microscopy. J Xray Sci Technol. 2013;21(1):103-10.
Sutphin JE, Kantor AL, Mathers WD, Mehaffey MG. Evaluation of infectious crystalline keratitis with confocal microscopy in a case series. Cornea. 1997 Jan;16(1):21-6.
Hillenaar T, van Cleynenbreugel H, Verjans GM, Wubbels RJ, Remeijer L. Monitoring the inflammatory process in herpetic stromal keratitis: the role of in vivo confocal microscopy. Ophthalmology. 2012 Jun;119(6):1102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.002. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
Yokogawa H, Kobayashi A, Mori N, Sugiyama K. Clin Ophthalmol. Mapping of dendritic lesions in patients with herpes simplex keratitis using in vivo confocal microscopy. 2015 Sep 24;9:1771-7. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S92517.
Astakhov Yu.S. Drug Reference Book for Ophthalmologists. St. Petersburg: "SAGA", 2002. - 176 p. (p. 36)
Ophthalmology: National Guidelines / ed. by S.E. Avetisov, E.A. Egorov, L.K. Moshetova, V.V. Neroev, Kh.P. Takhchidi. - M.: GEOTAR-Media, 2008. - 944 p. (p. 916)
Skryabina E.V., Astakhov Yu.S., Konenkova Ya.S. et al. Management of patients with Acanthamoeba keratitis. Oftal'mologicheskie vedomosti. 2017;10(4):24-32. doi: 10.17816/OV10424-31.
Skryabina E.V., Astakhov Yu.S., Konenkova Ya.S. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fungal keratitis. Part I. Oftal'mologicheskie vedomosti. 2018;11(3):63-73. doi: 10.17816/OV1136373.
Skryabina E.V., Astakhov Yu.S., Konenkova Ya.S. et al. Acanthamoeba keratitis. Literature review. Clinical cases. Oftal'mologicheskie vedomosti. 2019;12(1):59-71. doi: 10.17816/OV12159-71.
Astakhov Yu.S., Skryabina E.V., Konenkova Ya.S., Kasymov F.O., Bogomolova T.S., Pinegina O.N. Diagnosis and treatment of fungal keratitis. Oftal'mologicheskie vedomosti. 2013; 6(2): 75-80.
Jeremy J. H., Simon A. et al. Randomised controlled trial of topical combination therapy chlorhexidine 0.2% and natamycin 5% versus topical natamycin 5% alone for fungal keratitis in East Africa: study protocol. Wellcome Open Research 2025, 10:165.
Appendix A1. Working Group Composition
Arestova N.N., MD, Leading Researcher, Department of Pediatric Eye Pathology, National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases named after Helmholtz of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Brzheskiy V.V., MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology, Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Grishina E.E., MD, Professor, Professor at the Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Faculty of Advanced Medical Training, M.F. Vladimirskiy Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute (MONIKI), member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Drozdova E.A., MD, Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of Eye Diseases, South Ural State Medical University of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Kasparova E.A., PhD, Leading Researcher, Department of Pathology of Optical Media of the Eye, Research Institute of Eye Diseases, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Lebedev O.I., MD, Professor, Head of the Department of Ophthalmology, Omsk State Medical Academy, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Maychuk D.Yu., MD, Head of the Department of Therapeutic Ophthalmology, S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Russian Ministry of Health.
Markova E.Yu., MD, Head of the Department of Microsurgery and Functional Rehabilitation of the Eye in Children, S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Obrubov A.S., PhD, Associate Professor at the Department of Ophthalmology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Russian Ministry of Health; ophthalmologist at the inpatient unit of the Moscow City Ophthalmological Center, S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Panova I.E., MD, Professor, Deputy Director for Research, St. Petersburg Branch of the S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Polovinkina G.V., ophthalmologist of the highest qualification category, ophthalmologist at the fee-for-service ophthalmology department, City Diagnostic Center No. 7; expert in quality control of medical care provided to patients by the physicians of Department No. 1 (Pathology of the Anterior Segment of the Eye), member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Riks I.A., PhD, Head of the Ophthalmology Department, Nashe Zdorovye Multidisciplinary Clinic, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Saydasheva E.I., MD, Professor at the Department of Ophthalmology, North-Western State Medical University named after I.I. Mechnikov of the Russian Ministry of Health, Chief Pediatric Ophthalmologist of the Russian Ministry of Health in the North-Western Federal District, member of the Presidium of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation.
Safonova T.N., PhD, Leading Researcher, M.M. Krasnov Research Institute of Eye Diseases, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Slonimskiy A.Yu., MD, Professor, Moscow Eye Clinic, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Trufanov S.V., MD, Deputy Director for Research, Nashe Zdorovye Multidisciplinary Clinic, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Chernakova G.M., PhD, Associate Professor, Head of the Consultation Department, Moscow City Ophthalmological Center, S.P. Botkin City Clinical Hospital, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Chekhova T.A., PhD, Head of the Therapeutic Department, Novosibirsk Branch of the S.N. Fyodorov Eye Microsurgery Federal State Institution of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Yani E.V., PhD, Head of the Department of Infectious and Allergic Eye Diseases, National Medical Research Center of Eye Diseases named after Helmholtz of the Russian Ministry of Health, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Yanchenko S.V., MD, Associate Professor, Professor at the Department of Ophthalmology, Kuban State Medical University, ophthalmologist of the highest qualification category, member of the Association of Ophthalmologists, member of the Russian Ophthalmological Society.
Conflict of interest: none declared
Appendix A2. Methodology for Developing Clinical Guidelines
Target audience for these clinical guidelines:
· Ophthalmologists;
· General practitioners (family physicians)
Methods used for collecting/selecting evidence: search in electronic databases, analysis of current scientific developments on the problem of keratitis in Russia and abroad; synthesis of practical experience of Russian and foreign specialists; library resources. Description of methods used for collecting/selecting evidence: the evidence base for the guidelines includes publications included in the Cochrane Library, EMBASE and MEDLINE databases, as well as monographs and articles in leading specialized peer-reviewed domestic medical journals on the subject. The search depth was 10 years. Methods used for assessing the quality and strength of evidence: expert consensus, assessment of significance in accordance with the rating scale.
Table 1. Levels of Evidence (LoE) grading scale for diagnostic methods (diagnostic interventions)
LoE | Definition |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic reviews of studies with reference standard control or systematic review of randomized clinical trials using meta-analysis |
2 | Individual studies with reference standard control or individual randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except for randomized clinical trials, using meta-analysis |
3 | Studies without consecutive reference standard control or studies with a reference standard not independent of the test method, or non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case report |
5 | Only justification of mechanism of action or expert opinion is available |
Table 2. Scale for assessing levels of evidence (LE) for prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, therapeutic, and rehabilitative interventions)
LoE | Definitions |
|---|---|
1 | Systematic review of randomized controlled trials with meta-analysis |
2 | Individual randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews of studies of any design, except for randomized clinical trials using meta-analysis |
3 | Non-randomized comparative studies, including cohort studies |
4 | Non-comparative studies, case reports or case series, case-control studies |
5 | Only justification of the mechanism of action of the intervention (preclinical studies) or expert opinion is available |
Table 3. Scale for grading the grades of recommendation (GR) for prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation methods (preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitation interventions)
GoR | Definition |
|---|---|
A | Strong recommendation (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are consistent) |
C | Conditional recommendation (not all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are important, not all studies are of high or acceptable methodological quality, and/or their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
C | Weak recommendation (lack of adequate quality evidence (all considered efficacy criteria (outcomes) are unimportant, all studies are of low methodological quality, and their conclusions on the outcomes of interest are inconsistent) |
Procedure for updating clinical guidelines.
The clinical guidelines update mechanism provides for their systematic revision—at least once every three years, as well as upon the emergence of new evidence-based data regarding the diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and rehabilitation of specific diseases, or the presence of justified additions/comments to previously approved clinical guidelines, but no more frequently than once every 6 months.
Appendix A3. Reference Materials
Current instructions for the medicinal products mentioned in these clinical guidelines can be found on the website http://grls.rosminzdrav.ru
International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision (ICD-10). World Health Organization.
Nomenclature of Medical Services. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 804n dated October 13, 2017, "On Approval of the Nomenclature of Medical Services."
Federal Law No. 323-FZ "On the Fundamentals of Protecting the Health of Citizens in the Russian Federation" dated November 21, 2011.
Procedure for Providing Medical Care to the Adult Population for Diseases of the Eye, its Adnexa, and Orbit. Order of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation No. 902n dated November 12, 2012, "On Approval of the Procedure for Providing Medical Care to the Adult Population for Diseases of the Eye, its Adnexa, and Orbit."
List of Vital and Essential Drugs for Medical Use for 2020. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 2406-r dated October 12, 2019 (as amended on April 26, 2020), "On Approval of the List of Vital and Essential Drugs for 2020, as well as Lists of Drugs for Medical Use and the Minimum Assortment of Drugs Required for the Provision of Medical Care."
Appendix B. Physician Action Algorithms

Appendix C. Patient Information
Keratitis is inflammation of the cornea with/without disruption of its integrity; in the absence of timely diagnosis and treatment, it can lead to the risk of losing the eye, as well as a significant decrease in visual acuity, up to blindness.
Keratitis is a polymorphic process caused by bacteria, viruses, allergic agents, as well as non-infectious processes.
The patient must be informed about the possible symptoms of keratitis and its complications, and the need for urgent consultation with an ophthalmologist upon their appearance. Immediate medical attention from an ophthalmologist is required if any of the following symptoms occur: photophobia, pain, decreased and/or blurred vision, change in iris color, pupil size and shape.
Strict adherence to all prescriptions of the ophthalmologist and related specialists (rheumatologist, dermatologist, general practitioner, pediatrician, urologist, gynecologist, etc.) is required.
The patient must be aware of the potential side effects of therapy and the need to seek immediate medical attention from an ophthalmologist (or related specialists) if they develop.
Appendix G. Assessment Scales, Questionnaires, and Other Evaluation Tools
Rating scales, questionnaires, and other patient status assessment tools are not used.